From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 15 07:50:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866BC16A41C for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 07:50:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CAC743D49 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 07:50:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5F7oJWK008882 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 07:50:19 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j5F7oJvB008881; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 07:50:19 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 07:50:19 GMT Message-Id: <200506150750.j5F7oJvB008881@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Roman Bogorodskiy Cc: Subject: Re: ports/82235: New port: mail/mutt-ng X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Roman Bogorodskiy List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 07:50:19 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/82235; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Roman Bogorodskiy To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, vsevolod@highsecure.ru Cc: Subject: Re: ports/82235: New port: mail/mutt-ng Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 07:41:12 +0000 Does it worth making a port? I think we have most of these patches in mail/mutt-devel. Personally I think project doesn't deserve to be called "ng" just because of integrating a bunch of third-party patches. -Roman Bogorodskiy