From owner-freebsd-ipfw  Fri Jan 31  9:16:22 2003
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686ED37B401
	for <freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:16:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from skywalker.rogness.net (skywalker.rogness.net [64.251.173.102])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9724A43F3F
	for <freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 31 Jan 2003 09:16:20 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nick@rogness.net)
Received: from skywalker.rogness.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by skywalker.rogness.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h0VHG6FH073151;
	Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:16:06 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from nick@rogness.net)
Received: from localhost (nick@localhost)
	by skywalker.rogness.net (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) with ESMTP id h0VHG3r3073148;
	Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:16:04 -0700 (MST)
X-Authentication-Warning: skywalker.rogness.net: nick owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 10:16:01 -0700 (MST)
From: Nick Rogness <nick@rogness.net>
To: JoeB <barbish@a1poweruser.com>
Cc: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>,
	"Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@nitro.dk>, <freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: RE: Error in ipfw manpage for stateful rules?
In-Reply-To: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGKEODDEAA.barbish@a1poweruser.com>
Message-ID: <20030131101111.D73135-100000@skywalker.rogness.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ipfw.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ipfw>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ipfw>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, JoeB wrote:

[SNIP]
> I believe the subject to this thread is dealing with changing the
> examples and documentation to deal with getting IPFW/NATD/KEEP-STATE
> rules to play together correctly.
[SNIP]

	That was not the subject of the original thread.  It was an error
	with ipfw and keep-state in the man page.  Where did natd
	get involved?

	NAT & IPFW stateful inspection is a whole nother topic.
	Please use a seperate thread for that conversation.


Nick Rogness <nick@rogness.net>
-
  How many people here have telekenetic powers? Raise my hand.
  				-Emo Philips




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message