From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Aug 24 05:48:34 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id FAA17736
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 24 Aug 1995 05:48:34 -0700
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA17730
          for <hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 24 Aug 1995 05:48:32 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id FAA17667 for <hackers@freefall>; Thu, 24 Aug 1995 05:48:28 -0700
To: hackers@freefall.FreeBSD.org
Subject: Resurrecting our friend "sendbug"?
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 1995 05:48:28 -0700
Message-ID: <17665.809268508@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

It occurs to me that since the demise of `sendbug', we can easily drop
send-pr in its place as an alias and thus come back INTO conformance
with the long and cherished tradition of having a "sendbug" command
that gripped to CSRG or, in some cases, MtXinu!  What say folks?
Shall we alias sendbug to send-pr?

					Jordan