From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 13 12:13:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D390B1065670; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:13:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 917788FC15; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0376D41D; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:13:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4A705844E9; Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:13:40 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Xin LI References: <200912130314.nBD3E6pO071938@svn.freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 13:13:40 +0100 In-Reply-To: <200912130314.nBD3E6pO071938@svn.freebsd.org> (Xin LI's message of "Sun, 13 Dec 2009 03:14:06 +0000 (UTC)") Message-ID: <86hbrvjcln.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.95 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r200462 - in head/usr.bin: ar c89 calendar cksum cmp colcrt colrm compress cpuset expand fetch file2c find finger fmt fold gcore getopt hexdump jot killall ktrace lastcomm limits lock l... X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 12:13:41 -0000 Xin LI writes: > Author: delphij > Date: Sun Dec 13 03:14:06 2009 > New Revision: 200462 > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/200462 > > Log: > Revert most part of 200420 as requested, as more review and polish is > needed. It's a good idea, but it's also very hard to get right. I skimmed through the patch, and some of it is obviously correct (e.g. removing "pathnames.h" in one case) but some of it is almost certainly incorrect (e.g. removing which is actually required even if you don't notice it due to pollution from other headers). Is anybody working on POSIXizing our headers? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no