From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 26 1:19:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from tonga.alcom.co.uk (tonga.alcom.co.uk [212.47.64.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7630A37B7C3 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 01:19:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danh@jollyr.stargate.co.uk) Received: from gamer1 (dialup7-5.alcom.co.uk [212.47.65.69]) by tonga.alcom.co.uk (8.9.0/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA25215 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 09:19:04 GMT Message-ID: <000001bf9704$43d59f40$45412fd4@gamer1> From: "Dan Horrocks" To: Subject: tfc server on unix server Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 15:43:45 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0048_01BF9670.E759F880" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0048_01BF9670.E759F880 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Apologies for this unsolicited e-mail but i have access to a server = running unix. I have been given permission to install TFC on this = server. Where can i get the tfc server software for unix? Is it easy to install via FTP? Thanks for any help given ------=_NextPart_000_0048_01BF9670.E759F880 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Apologies for this unsolicited e-mail = but i have=20 access to a server running unix. I  have been given permission to = install=20 TFC on this server.
Where can i get the tfc server software = for=20 unix?
Is it easy to install via = FTP?
 
Thanks for any help=20 given
------=_NextPart_000_0048_01BF9670.E759F880-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 26 8:31:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from snipe.prod.itd.earthlink.net (snipe.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.62]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2971B37B918; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 08:31:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from someone@earthlink.net) Received: from earthlink.net (pool0178.cvx6-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net [209.178.158.178]) by snipe.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA18553; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 08:31:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <38DE3B05.B0CAC8FE@earthlink.net> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 08:29:57 -0800 From: Kevin Bailey X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Cc: marcel@freebsd.org Subject: linux_devtools port doesn't install Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org When I try to install the linux_devtools port, it fails with this output: % make install ===> Installing for linux_devtools-6.1 ===> linux_devtools-6.1 depends on file: /compat/linux/etc/redhat-release - found kernel-headers-2.2.12-20.i386.rpm failed dependencies: /bin/sh is needed by kernel-headers-2.2.12-20 *** Error code 1 I believe the problem is that its using /usr/local/bin/rpm when it should be using /compat/linux/bin/rpm (because only the latter knows what has already been installed under /compat/linux, AFAIK.) Replacing all the rpm's in the Makefile with /compat/linux/bin/rpm makes it work so the theory would seem to be correct. I guess another approach would be to temporarily prepend /compat/linux/bin to the PATH. If I've earned my gold star, could I get the answer to another question ? When building source based rpms (e.g. rpm --rebuild some-i386-src.rpm), what should my PATH be set to, { /bin:/usr/bin } or { /compat/linux/bin:/compat/linux/usr/bin } or a combination of the two ? Thanks much, /krb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 26 9:53: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from scaup.prod.itd.earthlink.net (scaup.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.121.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D4C37BA0A for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 09:53:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dmehler22@earthlink.net) Received: from hellraiser (ip231.dayton11.oh.pub-ip.psi.net [38.31.203.231]) by scaup.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA19505 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 09:53:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <003f01bf974b$bdf73760$0400a8c0@davemehler.tzo.com> Reply-To: "dave" From: "dave" To: Subject: doscmd? Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 12:50:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, Is anyone using the emulator doscmd which comes with freebsd 3.4-release? I'm trying to get it to boot a virtual dos and am having difficulties. I keep getting the error: can not stat /dev/rfd0 can not boot from drive c: when I add the line boot a: to .doscmdrc I instead get the error: can not boot from a: in addition to the above error about the statting. Help appreciated. Thanks. Dave. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 26 12: 1:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from atlrel2.hp.com (atlrel2.hp.com [156.153.255.202]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4534E37BA3B for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 12:01:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@cup.hp.com) Received: from adlmail.cup.hp.com (adlmail.cup.hp.com [15.0.100.30]) by atlrel2.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9470A122; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 15:01:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from cup.hp.com (gauss.cup.hp.com [15.28.97.152]) by adlmail.cup.hp.com with ESMTP (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.7.3 TIS 5.0.1) id MAA01549; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 12:01:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <38DE6C9F.A1DA4B05@cup.hp.com> Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2000 12:01:35 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar Organization: Hewlett-Packard X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Bailey Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linux_devtools port doesn't install References: <38DE3B05.B0CAC8FE@earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Kevin Bailey wrote: > > When I try to install the linux_devtools port, it fails > with this output: > > % make install > ===> Installing for linux_devtools-6.1 > ===> linux_devtools-6.1 depends on file: /compat/linux/etc/redhat-release - > found > kernel-headers-2.2.12-20.i386.rpm > failed dependencies: > /bin/sh is needed by kernel-headers-2.2.12-20 > *** Error code 1 Hmmm... You have to be very specific about what you did before you tried to install linux_devtools. Especially wrt to anything that modifies /compat/linux. A wild guess is that you used /compat/linux/bin/rpm by hand, which caused the RPM database to be converted to the new and backward incompatible format, and which broke the ability to use the FreeBSD port... > I believe the problem is that its using /usr/local/bin/rpm > when it should be using /compat/linux/bin/rpm (because > only the latter knows what has already been installed under > /compat/linux, AFAIK.) Replacing all the rpm's in the > Makefile with /compat/linux/bin/rpm makes it work so > the theory would seem to be correct. I guess another > approach would be to temporarily prepend /compat/linux/bin > to the PATH. This behaviour is supported by my wild guess. > If I've earned my gold star, could I get the answer to > another question ? You mean 2 other questions? :-) > When building source based rpms > (e.g. rpm --rebuild some-i386-src.rpm), what should > my PATH be set to, { /bin:/usr/bin } or > { /compat/linux/bin:/compat/linux/usr/bin } or > a combination of the two ? I'd go for /compat/linux/bin/rpm in your case. HTH, -- Marcel Moolenaar mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org tel: (408) 447-4222 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sun Mar 26 22:33:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from access.inet.co.th (access.inet.co.th [203.151.127.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC0C37BBD6 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2000 22:33:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from TruPPP3311.inet.co.th (TruPPP3311.inet.co.th [203.151.127.11]) by access.inet.co.th (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA13102 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 13:33:34 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 13:39:09 +0700 (ICT) From: pirat X-Sender: pirat@parwati.oaep.go.th To: FreeBSD-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: wine: dot dll is out of date need newer version Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org hi, i have hardly finished installation wine 991114 on my 3.4 fbsd machine. by setting [Drive A] and [Drive C] and [wine] properly in ~/.winerc, i can start wine. but one message box pops up and says TYPELIB.DLL is out of date and requires a newer version and dies. i do noy know what typelib.dll is but trying to add native in front of [DllOverides] section for the first two lines. it seems to run for two or three hours without any box pops up to annoy me. likely it's got stuck at some step. can any one here help me pointing out what typelib.dll is ? thanks in advance with best regards, pirat sriyotha To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Mar 27 2:22:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from morannon.fido.de (morannon.faho.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.57.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 729AF37BC2A for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 02:22:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tobi@bland.fido.de) Received: from gate.fido.de (news@localhost) by morannon.fido.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/redhat6-morannon-4.4) with FIDOGATE id MAA17461; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 12:21:02 +0200 Received: by sungate-ftn.fido.de (FIDOGATE 4.3.6) id AA17459; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 12:21:02 +0200 Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 12:14:34 +0200 From: tobi@bland.fido.de (Tobias Ernst) Reply-To: tobi@physcip.uni-stuttgart.de Subject: *STILL* no success with Office51 :-( Message-ID: In-Reply-To: To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Organization: Fido.DE domain gateway (Moving Bits e.V. / IN e.V.) Lines: 18 X-Gateway: FIDO morannon.fido.de [FIDOGATE 4.3.6] X-FTN-From: Tobias Ernst @ 242:7600/1.0 X-FTN-To: UUCP @ 242:4900/99.0 X-FTN-Via: 242:7600/0@fido.de @20000327.121959 CFR-OS/2 20000121-devel X-FTN-Via: FIDOGATE/ftntoss 242:1000/1.0, Mon Mar 27 2000 at 12:21:01 CEST X-FTN-Domain: Z242@fidode MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hallo All! I am running FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE and have cvsupped my ports tree recently and thought I'd give Staroffice another try. I have cleaned each and every remnant of my previous attempts and then use the german/staroffice51 port to try a fresh installation. Yet the situation has not improved: When running soffice (after make user-install), I get a dialog box telling me that the file "/home/tobi/Office51/sofficerc" cannot be found (but of course the file is there). More details on the problem, including a truss output, can be found in my post from Dec 24, 99. I have also followed each and every advise I got as follow-up to my post from Dec 24, but nothing of it helped in any form. :-| Viele Gr=FC=DFe, Tobias To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Mar 27 2:52:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from atdot.dotat.org (atdot.dotat.org [150.101.89.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3B337BC65 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 02:52:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from newton@atdot.dotat.org) Received: (from newton@localhost) by atdot.dotat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA21507; Mon, 27 Mar 2000 20:22:44 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from newton) Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2000 20:22:43 +0930 From: Mark Newton To: tobi@physcip.uni-stuttgart.de Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: *STILL* no success with Office51 :-( Message-ID: <20000327202243.B21428@atdot.dotat.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from tobi@bland.fido.de on Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 12:14:34PM +0200 X-PGP-Key: http://slash.dotat.org/~newton/pgpkey.txt Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 12:14:34PM +0200, Tobias Ernst wrote: > I am running FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE and have cvsupped my ports tree > recently and thought I'd give Staroffice another try. I have cleaned > each and every remnant of my previous attempts and then use the > german/staroffice51 port to try a fresh installation. Yet the situation > has not improved: Install the ports upgrade kit, then type: # cd /usr/ports/editors/staroffice5 # make install and follow the instructions from there. - mark -------------------------------------------------------------------- I tried an internal modem, newton@atdot.dotat.org but it hurt when I walked. Mark Newton ----- Voice: +61-4-1620-2223 ------------- Fax: +61-8-82231777 ----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Mar 28 17:34:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from rix.ibbs.com.br (rix.ibbs.com.br [200.249.240.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A47337C0A2 for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 17:34:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from john@netpe.com.br) Received: (qmail 27480 invoked by uid 1000); 29 Mar 2000 01:34:10 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Mar 2000 01:34:10 -0000 Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 22:34:10 -0300 (EST) From: Joao Paulo Campello X-Sender: john@rix.ibbs.com.br To: Marcel Moolenaar Cc: ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Linux emulation patches for FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE In-Reply-To: <38D91069.C61478E9@cup.hp.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Marcel and friends from ports and emulation mailing lists, I'm writing this email to ask some good sould to send me the patches for the linux emulation module on the FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE. Marc posted here a message from the emulation mailing list, it said that there was a patch for handling open sockets with linux made programs, that were not correctly handled builtin in the FreeBSD 3.4. I've tried to contact directly the author ot the message a few days ago, Victor, but I've received no response. Marcel commited these patch in the 4.0-RELEASE, but I really ought to install it in a 3.4-STABLE box, 'cause I need to use Java server programs, such as Tomcat. And as there isn't a FreeBSD version of JDK1.2.2 from Sun nor a JDK1.2.2 port for FreeBSD, my only way is to use linux binaries or the Blackdown port, which stills neeeds the patches for the linux emulation. Thanks in advance, Your truly, Joao Paulo Campello. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Mar 28 18:17:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from beta.nova.org (beta.nova.org [209.31.144.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA7A37B5D1; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 18:17:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsletten@nova.org) Received: from fcac.org (members.fcac.org [209.31.144.35]) by beta.nova.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA06961; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 21:17:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost by fcac.org (8.8.8+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id VAA23890; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 21:17:07 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 21:17:06 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Sletten To: Joao Paulo Campello Cc: Marcel Moolenaar , ports@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation patches for FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-559023410-1423418003-954296226=:21300" Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. ---559023410-1423418003-954296226=:21300 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII These patches only work on FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE - anything else, and you're on your own. Save the patches in a file, say /tmp/patches become root cd /usr/src/sys/i386/linux patch -p0 < /tmp/patches if the patches succeed, (they should fail only if you are not 3.4-STABLE) cd ../../modules/linux make I get some warnings about linux_sysent.c - they're ok. if the make succeeds, make install make clean Now you have two choices: The easy choice: reboot The fast choice: kill all processes using linux emulation kldunload linux kldload linux ---559023410-1423418003-954296226=:21300 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name=patches Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=patches LS0tIGxpbnV4X3NvY2tldC5jLm9yaWcJV2VkIEZlYiAgMiAxMjo0OToyMyAy MDAwDQorKysgbGludXhfc29ja2V0LmMJV2VkIEZlYiAgMiAxMzowMDoyNSAy MDAwDQpAQCAtNDQxLDYgKzQ0MSwxMSBAQA0KIAljYWRkcl90IG5hbWU7DQog CWludCAqYW5hbWVsZW47DQogICAgIH0gKi8gYnNkX2FyZ3M7DQorICAgIHN0 cnVjdCBmY250bF9hcmdzIC8qIHsNCisJaW50IGZkOw0KKwlpbnQgY21kOw0K Kwlsb25nIGFyZzsNCisgICAgfSAqLyBmX2FyZ3M7DQogICAgIGludCBlcnJv cjsNCiANCiAgICAgaWYgKChlcnJvcj1jb3B5aW4oKGNhZGRyX3QpYXJncywg KGNhZGRyX3QpJmxpbnV4X2FyZ3MsIHNpemVvZihsaW51eF9hcmdzKSkpDQop DQpAQCAtNDQ4LDcgKzQ1MywyMyBAQA0KICAgICBic2RfYXJncy5zID0gbGlu dXhfYXJncy5zOw0KICAgICBic2RfYXJncy5uYW1lID0gKGNhZGRyX3QpbGlu dXhfYXJncy5hZGRyOw0KICAgICBic2RfYXJncy5hbmFtZWxlbiA9IGxpbnV4 X2FyZ3MubmFtZWxlbjsNCi0gICAgcmV0dXJuIG9hY2NlcHQocCwgJmJzZF9h cmdzKTsNCisgICAgaWYgKGVycm9yID0gb2FjY2VwdChwLCAmYnNkX2FyZ3Mp KQ0KKwlyZXR1cm4gZXJyb3I7DQorICAgIC8qDQorICAgICAqIGxpbnV4IGFw cGVhcnMgbm90IHRvIGNvcHkgZmxhZ3MgZnJvbSB0aGUgcGFyZW50IHNvY2tl dCB0byB0aGUNCisgICAgICogYWNjZXB0ZWQgb25lLCBzbyB3ZSBtdXN0IGNs ZWFyIHRoZSBmbGFncyBpbiB0aGUgbmV3IGRlc2NyaXB0b3IuDQorICAgICAq Lw0KKyAgICBmX2FyZ3MuZmQgPSBwLT5wX3JldHZhbFswXTsNCisgICAgZl9h cmdzLmNtZCA9IEZfU0VURkw7DQorICAgIGZfYXJncy5hcmcgPSAwOw0KKyAg ICAvKg0KKyAgICAgKiB3ZSBpZ25vcmUgZXJyb3JzIGhlcmUgc2luY2Ugb3Ro ZXJ3aXNlIHdlIHdvdWxkIGhhdmUgYW4gb3BlbiBmaWxlDQorICAgICAqIGRl c2NyaXB0b3IgdGhhdCB3YXNuJ3QgcmV0dXJuZWQgdG8gdGhlIHVzZXIuDQor ICAgICAqLw0KKyAgICAodm9pZCkgZmNudGwocCwgJmZfYXJncyk7DQorICAg IC8qIHB1dCB0aGUgZmlsZSBkZXNjcmlwdG9yIGJhY2sgYXMgdGhlIHJldHVy biB2YWx1ZSAqLw0KKyAgICBwLT5wX3JldHZhbFswXSA9IGZfYXJncy5mZDsN CisgICAgcmV0dXJuIDA7DQogfQ0KIA0KIHN0cnVjdCBsaW51eF9nZXRzb2Nr bmFtZV9hcmdzIHsNCi0tLSBsaW51eF9maWxlLmMub3JpZwlXZWQgRmViICAy IDEyOjQ5OjE4IDIwMDANCisrKyBsaW51eF9maWxlLmMJV2VkIEZlYiAgMiAx MzowNjoyNyAyMDAwDQpAQCAtMTk2LDE4ICsxOTYsMTAgQEANCiAgICAgfSAq LyBmY250bF9hcmdzOyANCiAgICAgc3RydWN0IGxpbnV4X2Zsb2NrIGxpbnV4 X2Zsb2NrOw0KICAgICBzdHJ1Y3QgZmxvY2sgKmJzZF9mbG9jazsNCi0gICAg c3RydWN0IGZpbGVkZXNjICpmZHA7DQotICAgIHN0cnVjdCBmaWxlICpmcDsN Ci0gICAgc3RydWN0IHZub2RlICp2cDsNCi0gICAgc3RydWN0IHZhdHRyIHZh Ow0KLSAgICBsb25nIHBnaWQ7DQotICAgIHN0cnVjdCBwZ3JwICpwZ3JwOw0K LSAgICBzdHJ1Y3QgdHR5ICp0cCwgKigqZF90dHkpIF9fUCgoZGV2X3QpKTsN CiAgICAgY2FkZHJfdCBzZzsNCiANCiAgICAgc2cgPSBzdGFja2dhcF9pbml0 KCk7DQogICAgIGJzZF9mbG9jayA9IChzdHJ1Y3QgZmxvY2sgKilzdGFja2dh cF9hbGxvYygmc2csIHNpemVvZihzdHJ1Y3QgZmxvY2spKTsNCi0gICAgZF90 dHkgPSBOVUxMOw0KIA0KICNpZmRlZiBERUJVRw0KICAgICBwcmludGYoIkxp bnV4LWVtdWwoJWQpOiBmY250bCglZCwgJTA4eCwgKilcbiIsDQpAQCAtMjg2 LDQ3ICsyNzgsOSBAQA0KIA0KICAgICBjYXNlIExJTlVYX0ZfU0VUT1dOOg0K ICAgICBjYXNlIExJTlVYX0ZfR0VUT1dOOg0KLQkvKg0KLQkgKiBXZSBuZWVk IHRvIHJvdXRlIGFyb3VuZCB0aGUgbm9ybWFsIGZjbnRsKCkgZm9yIHRoZXNl IGNhbGxzLA0KLQkgKiBzaW5jZSBpdCB1c2VzIFRJT0N7RyxTfVBHUlAsIHdo aWNoIGlzIHRvbyByZXN0cmljdGl2ZSBmb3INCi0JICogTGludXggRl97RyxT fUVUT1dOIHNlbWFudGljcy4gRm9yIHNvY2tldHMsIHRoaXMgcHJvYmxlbQ0K LQkgKiBkb2VzIG5vdCBleGlzdC4NCi0JICovDQotCWZkcCA9IHAtPnBfZmQ7 DQotCWlmICgodV9pbnQpYXJncy0+ZmQgPj0gZmRwLT5mZF9uZmlsZXMgfHwN Ci0JCShmcCA9IGZkcC0+ZmRfb2ZpbGVzW2FyZ3MtPmZkXSkgPT0gTlVMTCkN Ci0JICAgIHJldHVybiBFQkFERjsNCi0JaWYgKGZwLT5mX3R5cGUgPT0gRFRZ UEVfU09DS0VUKSB7DQotCSAgICBmY250bF9hcmdzLmNtZCA9IGFyZ3MtPmNt ZCA9PSBMSU5VWF9GX1NFVE9XTiA/IEZfU0VUT1dOIDogRl9HRVRPV047DQot ICAgIAkgICAgZmNudGxfYXJncy5hcmcgPSBhcmdzLT5hcmc7DQotCSAgICBy ZXR1cm4gZmNudGwocCwgJmZjbnRsX2FyZ3MpOyANCi0JfQ0KLQl2cCA9IChz dHJ1Y3Qgdm5vZGUgKilmcC0+Zl9kYXRhOw0KLQlpZiAodnAtPnZfdHlwZSAh PSBWQ0hSKQ0KLQkgICAgcmV0dXJuIEVJTlZBTDsNCi0JaWYgKChlcnJvciA9 IFZPUF9HRVRBVFRSKHZwLCAmdmEsIHAtPnBfdWNyZWQsIHApKSkNCi0JICAg IHJldHVybiBlcnJvcjsNCi0NCi0JZF90dHkgPSBjZGV2c3dbbWFqb3IodmEu dmFfcmRldildLT5kX2RldnRvdHR5Ow0KLQlpZiAoIWRfdHR5IHx8ICghKHRw ID0gKCpkX3R0eSkodmEudmFfcmRldikpKSkNCi0JICAgIHJldHVybiBFSU5W QUw7DQotCWlmIChhcmdzLT5jbWQgPT0gTElOVVhfRl9HRVRPV04pIHsNCi0J ICAgIHAtPnBfcmV0dmFsWzBdID0gdHAtPnRfcGdycCA/IHRwLT50X3BncnAt PnBnX2lkIDogTk9fUElEOw0KLQkgICAgcmV0dXJuIDA7DQotCX0NCi0JaWYg KChsb25nKWFyZ3MtPmFyZyA8PSAwKSB7DQotCSAgICBwZ2lkID0gLShsb25n KWFyZ3MtPmFyZzsNCi0JfSBlbHNlIHsNCi0JICAgIHN0cnVjdCBwcm9jICpw MSA9IHBmaW5kKChsb25nKWFyZ3MtPmFyZyk7DQotCSAgICBpZiAocDEgPT0g MCkNCi0JCXJldHVybiAoRVNSQ0gpOw0KLQkgICAgcGdpZCA9IChsb25nKXAx LT5wX3BncnAtPnBnX2lkOw0KLQl9DQotCXBncnAgPSBwZ2ZpbmQocGdpZCk7 DQotCWlmIChwZ3JwID09IE5VTEwgfHwgcGdycC0+cGdfc2Vzc2lvbiAhPSBw LT5wX3Nlc3Npb24pDQotCSAgICByZXR1cm4gRVBFUk07DQotCXRwLT50X3Bn cnAgPSBwZ3JwOw0KLQlyZXR1cm4gMDsNCisJZmNudGxfYXJncy5jbWQgPSBh cmdzLT5jbWQgPT0gTElOVVhfRl9TRVRPV04gPyBGX1NFVE9XTiA6IEZfR0VU T1dOOw0KKwlmY250bF9hcmdzLmFyZyA9IGFyZ3MtPmFyZzsNCisJcmV0dXJu IGZjbnRsKHAsICZmY250bF9hcmdzKTsgDQogICAgIH0NCiAgICAgcmV0dXJu IEVJTlZBTDsNCiB9DQo= ---559023410-1423418003-954296226=:21300-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Mar 28 19: 6:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from palrel3.hp.com (palrel3.hp.com [156.153.255.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D74337BB8E for ; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 19:06:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@cup.hp.com) Received: from adlmail.cup.hp.com (adlmail.cup.hp.com [15.0.100.30]) by palrel3.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A4B1015; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 19:06:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from cup.hp.com (gauss.cup.hp.com [15.28.97.152]) by adlmail.cup.hp.com with ESMTP (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.7.3 TIS 5.0.1) id TAA29771; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 19:04:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <38E172BD.CDE6D13B@cup.hp.com> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2000 19:04:29 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar Organization: Hewlett-Packard X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Sletten Cc: Joao Paulo Campello , freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation patches for FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [removed -ports from the CC list] Brian Sletten wrote: > > These patches only work on FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE - anything else, and you're > on your own. > I only committed the patch to linux_socket in 4.0. The patch to linux_file seems to revert code that is there for a reason (AFAICT). I'm not saying the patch *is* wrong; I'm saying that I don't know why the patch is correct and have suspicion that it might be wrong... I planned to MFC as soon as technically possible. -- Marcel Moolenaar mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org tel: (408) 447-4222 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Mar 29 5:48:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from nts.mapisrael.com (nts.mapa.co.il [192.116.157.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6296337BFDC for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 05:48:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ak@freenet.co.uk) Received: from freenet.co.uk (ALEX [192.116.157.120]) by nts.mapisrael.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21) id HHM3LP8C; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 15:47:28 +0200 Message-ID: <38E20967.57582FBA@freenet.co.uk> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 15:47:19 +0200 From: "ak@freenet.co.uk" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: How stable is VMWare under FreeBSD? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The subject says it all really - most of the development in my company is for Windows (NT/9x), and I'm really tired of having to reboot my machine every couple of hours of intensive debugging, so I was thinking of using VMWare for Linux under FreeBSD, since it's much easier to pull the plug on a virtual box. However, I need to be certain that VMWare can cope with everything I want to do under Windows - in particular, compile and debug programs that use lots of virtual memory (I'm going to give VMWare 128Mb of RAM, but Windows might have to swap intensively). So all in all, is it reasonable to expect to be able to run Visual C++ and develop/debug large applications in a WinNT VMWare session without affecting the stability and responsiveness of the FreeBSD box (which I hope to use for other things as well)? I would also need to mount FreeBSD Samba shares from VMWare in order to exchange and back up data (assuming it's possible). I have a PIII-550, 256Mb RAM - what performance can I expect out of VMWare (w/128Mb RAM)? Any advice will be much appreciated. Alex Keahan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Mar 29 7:25:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from thelab.hub.org (nat194.99.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.194.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38DD37C0DA for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 07:25:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (scrappy@localhost) by thelab.hub.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA07680; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:25:02 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) X-Authentication-Warning: thelab.hub.org: scrappy owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 11:25:02 -0400 (AST) From: The Hermit Hacker To: "ak@freenet.co.uk" Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: How stable is VMWare under FreeBSD? In-Reply-To: <38E20967.57582FBA@freenet.co.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm not happy witih the performance of VMWare on a 'single processor machine', but I've currently only got a PII-450 on my desk, with 256MEg of RAM and SCSI drives. I just picked up a dual-celeron 466 for home, that when the second chip comes in, I'm going to see if that helps (ie. VMWARE hopefully grabs an idle CPU) ... On a PIII machine here in the office, we've also noticed that the machine 'hangs' periodically with an IDE drive ... it appears to be when Windoze decides to do some serious disk trashing, but tha tone only has 64Meg of RAM, so the memory available to VMware is very small. IMHO, I figure putting the VMware "file systems" onto its own disk should help some, and, hopefully, a second CPU will help some too ... stability wise, I've been most happy with it ... On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, ak@freenet.co.uk wrote: > The subject says it all really - most of the development in my company > is for Windows (NT/9x), and I'm really tired of having to reboot my > machine every couple of hours of intensive debugging, so I was thinking > of using VMWare for Linux under FreeBSD, since it's much easier to pull > the plug on a virtual box. However, I need to be certain that VMWare > can cope with everything I want to do under Windows - in particular, > compile and debug programs that use lots of virtual memory (I'm going to > give VMWare 128Mb of RAM, but Windows might have to swap intensively). > So all in all, is it reasonable to expect to be able to run Visual C++ > and develop/debug large applications in a WinNT VMWare session without > affecting the stability and responsiveness of the FreeBSD box (which I > hope to use for other things as well)? I would also need to mount > FreeBSD Samba shares from VMWare in order to exchange and back up data > (assuming it's possible). I have a PIII-550, 256Mb RAM - what > performance can I expect out of VMWare (w/128Mb RAM)? > > Any advice will be much appreciated. > > Alex Keahan > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message > Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Mar 29 14: 0:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.Sun.COM (mercury.Sun.COM [192.9.25.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788FC37C1C9 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:00:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Tomi.Vainio@finland.sun.com) Received: from sunfin.Finland.Sun.COM ([129.159.101.10]) by mercury.Sun.COM (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA17674 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 14:00:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from ultrahot.Finland.Sun.COM (ultrahot [129.159.101.87]) by sunfin.Finland.Sun.COM (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8/ENSMAIL,v1.7) with ESMTP id BAA21431 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 01:00:35 +0300 (EET DST) Received: (from tomppa@localhost) by ultrahot.Finland.Sun.COM (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA28395; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 01:00:34 +0300 (EET DST) From: Tomi Vainio - Sun Finland - MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14562.32002.164134.781143@ultrahot.Finland.Sun.COM> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 01:00:34 +0300 (EET DST) To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Acrobat Reader fonts broken when using 24bit display X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 6) "Big Bend" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: Tomi.Vainio@Sun.COM Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I have this same problem with 4.0R and 5.0 current when using Linux Acrobat Reader. Fonts are overlapping and it makes text unreadable. Problem appears only when Xserver (XFree86-3.3.6) is configured for 24bit. 8/16/32bit is just fine. Any ideas? Tomppa -- SUN Microsystems Oy PL 112, Lars Sonckin kaari 12, 02601 ESPOO, Finland Tomi Vainio (System Support Engineer) +358 9 52556300 hotline email: Tomi.Vainio@Sun.COM +358 9 52556252 fax To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Mar 29 17: 6:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from guardian.sftw.com (guardian.sftw.com [209.157.37.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D49537BEEC for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:06:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@sftw.com) Received: from yoda.sftw.com (yoda.sftw.com [209.157.37.211]) by guardian.sftw.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA72350 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:06:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@sftw.com) Received: from sftw.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yoda.sftw.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA06364 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:06:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@sftw.com) Message-ID: <38E2A8A6.21221B6C@sftw.com> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:06:46 -0800 From: Nick Sayer Reply-To: nsayer@kfu.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: vmware 2.0 raw disk workaround -- plain disks Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I am _THIS_ close to getting my NT partition to boot again under vmware 2.0. Here's what I've done. Instead of using a raw disk setup, I have created a plain disk setup using a FreeBSD raw device as one of the files. Here's how. My IDE disk shows up to fdisk(8) as a 1027c/255h/63s disk. NT is starts at sector 63 and is 4192902 sectors long. I created an 'nt4.hd' plain disk setup file containing this: DRIVETYPE ide CYLINDERS 261 HEADS 255 SECTORS 63 ACCESS "/home/vmware/mbr" 0 63 ACCESS "/dev/rad0s1" 63 4192902 To create "mbr", you dd a 32256 file from /dev/zero (63 sectors), use vnconfig to turn it into a device, then run fdisk on it with -B and -i. Tell it the geometry in the plain disk file. This setup boots and gets me into loading NT before it blue screens because it wants my boot device to be IDE. However.... When I hook this same disk up as the IDE primary master, it just hangs and I never even see the NT boot menu come up. I suspect the guest machine BIOS can't deal with the phony geometry I've set up, and attempting to change the geometry fails miserably. But this concept may be an answer for those of you suddenly unable to boot raw disk partitions under vmware. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Mar 29 17:40:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from guardian.sftw.com (guardian.sftw.com [209.157.37.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1935037B711 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:39:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@sftw.com) Received: from yoda.sftw.com (yoda.sftw.com [209.157.37.211]) by guardian.sftw.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA72671 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:39:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@sftw.com) Received: from sftw.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yoda.sftw.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA06488 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:39:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@sftw.com) Message-ID: <38E2B066.367F1E77@sftw.com> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:39:51 -0800 From: Nick Sayer Reply-To: nsayer@quack.kfu.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vmware 2.0 raw disk workaround -- plain disks References: <38E2A8A6.21221B6C@sftw.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I hate it when I get almost there, post, then find the answer. :-) In order to make this work, I had to specify the actual reported geometry, not the BIOS faked one. In this case, it's 16383/16/63. I suspect that the actual solution is to specify a geometry large enough that the BIOS ends up using the same phony geometry (*/255/63) that the host BIOS (that is, the real machine) uses. Just to keep everyone sane, I have for now added /dev/rad0s2 as an RDONLY section in the correct place. I may try and remove that and see what VMware does when a plain disk is not fully occupied. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Mar 29 17:44:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net (hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.120.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E96A37B752 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:44:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dmehler22@earthlink.net) Received: from hellraiser (ip203.dayton6.oh.pub-ip.psi.net [38.27.182.203]) by hawk.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA07090 for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 17:44:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <000f01bf99e9$1d8a5d20$0400a8c0@davemehler.tzo.com> Reply-To: "dave" From: "dave" To: Subject: using doscmd for dos emulation. Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 20:41:36 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, Is anyone using doscmd to emulate dos? If so, how are you doing it? Thanks. Dave. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Mar 30 4:40:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mail.futurniture.se (starlet.futurniture.se [195.242.45.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8743B37B949 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 04:40:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fredrik.carlen@futurniture.se) Received: (qmail 8099 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2000 12:40:40 -0000 Received: from firewall.hitechbuilding.se (HELO fredrikc) (195.242.45.9) by mail.futurniture.se with SMTP; 30 Mar 2000 12:40:40 -0000 Message-ID: <00cc01bf9a45$36eff660$af07a8c0@futurniture.se> From: "Fredrik Carlén" To: Subject: VMware configuration Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 14:41:05 +0200 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi! I am a web programmer trying desperately to get away from my NT environment, and I have therefore tried to get VMware running on FreeBSD4.0-RELEASE. However, I can't make the configuration wizard understand where 'netscape' and 'grep' is located...simply by not being able to choose (in the Motif file chooser) "/usr/local/" or "/usr/bin/" where they are located. No problem in finding them in bash (or sh, for that matter). The problem could very well be that my license is for v1.0, and I am running the version offered in the ports collection. Any suggestions, anyone? Should I get a 'proper' license first, before bothering y'all again? /Fredrik in Stockholm, Sweden fredrik.carlen@futurniture.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Mar 30 15:15:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from guardian.sftw.com (guardian.sftw.com [209.157.37.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 475A537B9CB for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:15:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@sftw.com) Received: from yoda.sftw.com (yoda.sftw.com [209.157.37.211]) by guardian.sftw.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA82810 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:15:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@sftw.com) Received: from sftw.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yoda.sftw.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA00993 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:15:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@sftw.com) Message-ID: <38E3E010.BA16A153@sftw.com> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 15:15:28 -0800 From: Nick Sayer Reply-To: nsayer@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: More on vmware plain disks Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org So I have figured some more stuff out. Since I installed v2.0, I was unable to use raw devices, so I created a virtual win98 partition and let my nt partition lie fallow, as it were. During that time, I figured out that having the /tmp directory for vmware get backed by tmpfs made for frequent hangs and traps. So for a while now, my machine has been pretty stable with vmware. As soon as I figured out how to use a FreeBSD "slice" /dev entry in a plain disk configuration, I've started to see some mysterious hangs again. I have dd'ed the NT partition out of its device into a file and am using that with, I hope, more long term success. If this configuration crashes less, then I would have to conclude that there's something fishy about pounding a raw disk device (at least a /dev/rad0s? one) from a userland process. In the meantime, I have found that plain disks have some advantages over virtual ones. Not only can you with reasonable ease transfer them back and forth from suitable disks, you can also use vnconfig to mount them if all you want to do in vmware is fetch a single file. You can't do that at all with a virtual disk. The sole advantage of a virtual disk is that it can grow and shrink with the guest filesystem's usage. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Mar 30 17:11:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from guardian.sftw.com (guardian.sftw.com [209.157.37.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1C537B520 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:11:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@sftw.com) Received: from yoda.sftw.com (yoda.sftw.com [209.157.37.211]) by guardian.sftw.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA83867 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:11:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@sftw.com) Received: from sftw.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yoda.sftw.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA00564 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:11:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@sftw.com) Message-ID: <38E3FB31.3DD4D170@sftw.com> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:11:13 -0800 From: Nick Sayer Reply-To: nsayer@kfu.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: NT vs WIN98 as vmware guest Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org After some time with both, it is begining to dawn on me that the difference between success and frequent hangs with vmware under FreeBSD is the difference between win98 and NT4. On the same machine I have two guests. One is now an NT4 NTFS partition running in a plain disk. The other is win98 running in a virtual disk. The win98 setup is reasonably stable. The NT4 setup will lock FreeBSD solid usually in anywhere from minutes to a couple hours (this is with RELENG_4 as of today). Has anyone else seen horrible, dramatic problems with NT4 as a guest under a FreeBSD host using vmware v2? I would sort of prefer NT, since the few times a difference between the two matters, having NT is preferable. Oh, and it's NT4 workstation, SP 6a. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Mar 30 18: 2:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mailg.telia.com (mailg.telia.com [194.22.194.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E9237C2A5 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 18:02:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Received: from d1o90.telia.com (d1o90.telia.com [195.67.216.241]) by mailg.telia.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id EAA01078 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 04:02:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from stordatan.telia.com (t3o90p57.telia.com [195.67.217.57]) by d1o90.telia.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA26030 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 04:02:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from girgen@localhost) by stordatan.telia.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id EAA86039; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 04:01:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) X-Authentication-Warning: stordatan.palle.se: girgen set sender to girgen@partitur.se using -f To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: networking vmware From: Palle Girgensohn Date: 31 Mar 2000 04:01:58 +0200 Message-ID: <87d7obkicp.fsf@stordatan.palle.se> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I have a feeling this question is more than trivial, but I'm too tired to think :) How am I supposed to get vmware to network? I'm using the fresh port of vmware2. The port asks for a network address, and this is connected to the vmnet1 interface, using ifconfig. Shall this be a real IP address on my LAN, or is it an internal network "inside" the host computer? I gather the second, right? Then, I need to enable a gateway on the host and also do NAT, right? I'll do some rtfm on the vmware site, but if someone has a short explanation, I'll be much obliged. Cheers! Palle To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Mar 30 19:31:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp [210.234.123.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9592D37B8A5 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 19:31:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from knu@idaemons.org) Received: from daemon.local.idaemons.org (pc343042.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp [203.140.143.42]) by ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (8.9.1/3.7W 03/13/00) with ESMTP id MAA28792; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 12:31:16 +0900 (JST) Received: by daemon.local.idaemons.org (8.9.3/3.7W) id MAA40052; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 12:30:45 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 12:30:44 +0900 Message-ID: <86d7obyfx7.wl@daemon.local.idaemons.org> From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" To: girgen@partitur.se Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: networking vmware In-Reply-To: In your message of "31 Mar 2000 04:01:58 +0200" <87d7obkicp.fsf@stordatan.palle.se> References: <87d7obkicp.fsf@stordatan.palle.se> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.2.18 (Please Forgive Me) EMIKO/1.13.12 (Euglena sociabilis) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 Emacs/20.6 (i386--freebsd) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN) Organization: Associated I. Daemons X-PGP-Public-Key: finger knu@FreeBSD.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1BEF D9B2 BABD 25D7 659A FD08 89C2 F3BE E981 4E16 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.13.12 - "Euglena sociabilis") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, At 31 Mar 2000 04:01:58 +0200, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > How am I supposed to get vmware to network? Currently only "host-only" networking is supported. > I'm using the fresh port of vmware2. The port asks for a network > address, and this is connected to the vmnet1 interface, using > ifconfig. Shall this be a real IP address on my LAN, or is it an > internal network "inside" the host computer? I gather the second, > right? Then, I need to enable a gateway on the host and also do NAT, > right? No need to do NAT. Just enable a gateway and add route to vmnet. It's a real, effective IP address. Consult "netstat -rn" and try it. If this question seems frequently asked, I'll put a plain explanation on "Hints.FreeBSD". :) -- / /__ __ / ) ) ) ) / Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( "If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Mar 30 23: 0:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121B037BE41 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 23:00:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA66463; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 23:00:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <38E44D1F.E490CA0F@gorean.org> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 23:00:47 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Akinori -Aki- MUSHA Cc: girgen@partitur.se, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: networking vmware References: <87d7obkicp.fsf@stordatan.palle.se> <86d7obyfx7.wl@daemon.local.idaemons.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Akinori -Aki- MUSHA wrote: > > Hi, > > At 31 Mar 2000 04:01:58 +0200, > Palle Girgensohn wrote: > > How am I supposed to get vmware to network? > > Currently only "host-only" networking is supported. What does this mean exactly? If I'm running freebsd, and running windows in vmware, will the windows apps have access to the network? Doug -- "So, the cows were part of a dream that dreamed itself into existence? Is that possible?" asked the student incredulously. The master simply replied, "Mu." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Mar 30 23:14:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from overcee.netplex.com.au (peter1.yahoo.com [208.48.107.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878E237BC35 for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 23:14:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBCCA1CD7; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 23:14:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Doug Barton Cc: Akinori -Aki- MUSHA , girgen@partitur.se, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: networking vmware In-Reply-To: Message from Doug Barton of "Thu, 30 Mar 2000 23:00:47 PST." <38E44D1F.E490CA0F@gorean.org> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 23:14:16 -0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20000331071416.BBCCA1CD7@overcee.netplex.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Doug Barton wrote: > Akinori -Aki- MUSHA wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > At 31 Mar 2000 04:01:58 +0200, > > Palle Girgensohn wrote: > > > How am I supposed to get vmware to network? > > > > Currently only "host-only" networking is supported. > > What does this mean exactly? If I'm running freebsd, and running window s > in vmware, will the windows apps have access to the network? Well, the "contained" environment only has direct access to the host.. However, the host can route or bridge or nat via other methods... If you give the vmnet interface a valid routable address you can set your freebsd host to do ipforwarding and set up your routes and it'll work as though it was a small ethernet with a real box on the other end instead of an emulated system. > Doug > -- > "So, the cows were part of a dream that dreamed itself into > existence? Is that possible?" asked the student incredulously. > The master simply replied, "Mu." > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message > > Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 31 3:40:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from web1606.mail.yahoo.com (web1606.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.23.206]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E158F37BBD8 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 03:40:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from op4l@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 14533 invoked by uid 60001); 31 Mar 2000 11:40:33 -0000 Message-ID: <20000331114033.14532.qmail@web1606.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.106.59.189] by web1606.mail.yahoo.com; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 03:40:33 PST Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 03:40:33 -0800 (PST) From: "Nawfal M. Rouyan" Subject: vmware2 problem To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I've just subscribed to this list and would like to ask a question obout the vmware2 port. Why is it that the vmware2 port that I install doesn't seem to execute under the /compat/linux dir? What I mean is that vmware search for libraries which exists in the /compat/linux directory but when I execute it, it searched at the / directory. I'm currently using FreeBSD 5.0 Current as of March 31 2000. %uname -a FreeBSD opal.cyber.mmu.edu.my 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Fri Mar 31 08:22:40 MYT 2000 root@opal.cyber.mmu.edu.my:/usr/src/sys/compile/OPAL i386 thanks __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 31 4:17:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp [210.234.123.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23A637B8C3 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 04:17:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from knu@idaemons.org) Received: from daemon.local.idaemons.org (pc343042.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp [203.140.143.42]) by ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (8.9.1/3.7W 03/13/00) with ESMTP id VAA18588; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 21:16:40 +0900 (JST) Received: by daemon.local.idaemons.org (8.9.3/3.7W) id VAA45366; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 21:16:08 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 21:16:07 +0900 Message-ID: <863dp7mj20.wl@daemon.local.idaemons.org> From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" To: Doug@gorean.org Cc: girgen@partitur.se, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: networking vmware In-Reply-To: In your message of "Thu, 30 Mar 2000 23:00:47 -0800" <38E44D1F.E490CA0F@gorean.org> References: <87d7obkicp.fsf@stordatan.palle.se> <86d7obyfx7.wl@daemon.local.idaemons.org> <38E44D1F.E490CA0F@gorean.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.2.18 (Please Forgive Me) EMIKO/1.13.12 (Euglena sociabilis) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 Emacs/20.6 (i386--freebsd) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN) Organization: Associated I. Daemons X-PGP-Public-Key: finger knu@FreeBSD.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1BEF D9B2 BABD 25D7 659A FD08 89C2 F3BE E981 4E16 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.13.12 - "Euglena sociabilis") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At Thu, 30 Mar 2000 23:00:47 -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Akinori -Aki- MUSHA wrote: > > Currently only "host-only" networking is supported. > > What does this mean exactly? If I'm running freebsd, and running windows > in vmware, will the windows apps have access to the network? The answer is YES of course! Please read the manuals first. -- / /__ __ / ) ) ) ) / Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( "If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 31 4:26:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from queeg.ludd.luth.se (queeg.ludd.luth.se [130.240.16.109]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BCBD37B892 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 04:26:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from johan@ludd.luth.se) Received: from speedy.ludd.luth.se (johan@speedy.ludd.luth.se [130.240.16.164]) by queeg.ludd.luth.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA21487 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 14:26:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 14:26:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Johan Larsson To: FreeBSD Emulation Subject: Vmware 1.1? Message-ID: X-uri: http://www.ludd.luth.se/users/johan/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Does anyone know where to get license for vmware 1.1, at least an evaluation license. Or have they stopped supporting that totally? Johan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 31 7:27: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp [210.234.123.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E124A37BB42 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 07:27:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from knu@idaemons.org) Received: from daemon.local.idaemons.org (pc343042.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp [203.140.143.42]) by ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (8.9.1/3.7W 03/13/00) with ESMTP id AAA27416; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 00:26:28 +0900 (JST) Received: by daemon.local.idaemons.org (8.9.3/3.7W) id AAA46908; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 00:25:57 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:25:56 +0900 Message-ID: <863dp7xit7.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" To: johan@ludd.luth.se Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Vmware 1.1? In-Reply-To: In your message of "Fri, 31 Mar 2000 14:26:21 +0200 (CEST)" References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.2.18 (Please Forgive Me) EMIKO/1.13.12 (Euglena sociabilis) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 9) (Canyonlands) (i386--freebsd) Organization: Associated I. Daemons X-PGP-Public-Key: finger knu@FreeBSD.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1BEF D9B2 BABD 25D7 659A FD08 89C2 F3BE E981 4E16 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.13.12 - "Euglena sociabilis") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, At Fri, 31 Mar 2000 14:26:21 +0200 (CEST), Johan Larsson wrote: > > Does anyone know where to get license for vmware 1.1, at least an > evaluation license. Or have they stopped supporting that totally? DES has once told me that a license for VMware 2.0 would apply to 1.1. I've not confirmed myself, it would be worth a try for you! -- / /__ __ / ) ) ) ) / Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( "If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 31 7:56:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp [210.234.123.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D2F37BC71 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 07:56:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from knu@idaemons.org) Received: from daemon.local.idaemons.org (pc343042.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp [203.140.143.42]) by ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (8.9.1/3.7W 03/13/00) with ESMTP id AAA03118; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 00:56:04 +0900 (JST) Received: by daemon.local.idaemons.org (8.9.3/3.7W) id AAA47118; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 00:55:32 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:55:31 +0900 Message-ID: <861z4rxhfw.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" To: op4l@yahoo.com Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vmware2 problem In-Reply-To: In your message of "Fri, 31 Mar 2000 03:40:33 -0800 (PST)" <20000331114033.14532.qmail@web1606.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20000331114033.14532.qmail@web1606.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.2.18 (Please Forgive Me) EMIKO/1.13.12 (Euglena sociabilis) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 9) (Canyonlands) (i386--freebsd) Organization: Associated I. Daemons X-PGP-Public-Key: finger knu@FreeBSD.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1BEF D9B2 BABD 25D7 659A FD08 89C2 F3BE E981 4E16 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.13.12 - "Euglena sociabilis") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At Fri, 31 Mar 2000 03:40:33 -0800 (PST), Nawfal M. Rouyan wrote: > Why is it that the vmware2 port that I install doesn't > seem to execute under the /compat/linux dir? > What I mean is that vmware search for libraries which > exists in the /compat/linux directory but when I > execute it, it searched at the / directory. Please read the handbook. (Chapter 23. Linux Binary Compatibility) When a Linux program requests `/foo/bar', `/compat/linux/foo/bar' will be the first for FreeBSD to try, and if that doesn't exist, then it will try `/foo/bar', internally. I guess you thought vmware2 tried only under `/' because it displayed `/foo/bar doesn't exist'. But in reality FreeBSD must have tried both `/compat/linux/foo/bar' and `/foo/bar'. -- / /__ __ / ) ) ) ) / Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( "If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 31 8:48:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from web1602.mail.yahoo.com (web1602.mail.yahoo.com [128.11.23.202]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D351437BD5F for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 08:48:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from op4l@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 19590 invoked by uid 60001); 31 Mar 2000 16:48:18 -0000 Message-ID: <20000331164818.19589.qmail@web1602.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.106.61.39] by web1602.mail.yahoo.com; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 08:48:18 PST Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 08:48:18 -0800 (PST) From: "Nawfal M. Rouyan" Subject: Re: vmware2 problem To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I do have /compat/linux but it still do not find the appropriate libraries. But ldd /usr/local/bin/vmware is ok. I realized this because vmware also dumps core when I press the power on button. Then I execute gdb and find that it fails to find the /lib/libNoVersion.so.1 which I have in my system under /compat/linux/lib directory. Then I tried creating a directory /lib and make a link to /compat/linux/lib/libNoVersion.so.1 in /lib. I tried executing vmware and when I pressed power on button, it dumps core again. I execute gdb and it states that it can't find the libm..?? which is exists in my /compat/linux/lib bypassing the check for libNoVersion.so.1. This makes me think that it didn't search the /compat/linux directory first when I execute it. The question is should I install again the linux_base port though linux-netscape works fine? Even Linux's Realplayer 7 beta works fine. This makes me wonder because I've installed reinstalled vmware for a number of times but the same things still occurs. Thanks ;-) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 31 9: 0:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E85337B92E; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 08:59:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA16347; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:58:41 -0500 (EST) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) id LAA04513; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:58:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:58:11 -0500 (EST) To: nsayer@kfu.com Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG, dillon@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: VMware locks FreeBSD 4.0 solid In-Reply-To: <38E3FB31.3DD4D170@sftw.com> References: <38E3FB31.3DD4D170@sftw.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: <14564.53252.962047.551231@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Nick Sayer writes: > > Has anyone else seen horrible, dramatic problems with NT4 as a guest > under a FreeBSD host > using vmware v2? I would sort of prefer NT, since the few times a > difference between the two > matters, having NT is preferable. > > Oh, and it's NT4 workstation, SP 6a. I don't think its specific to NT. Rather, I think vmware will lock FreeBSD solid if the FreeBSD host is under serious memory pressure. I'm hoping that Matt might be able to shed some light on it for us. I'm running VMware 2.0 & FreeBSD 4.0-RELEASE. The host is a 512MB 450MHz PIII, vmware is configured to use 64MB. If I run a synthetic program to apply memory pressure to the system, I can lock the machine solid within minutes. (app is ftp://ftp.cs.duke.edu/pub/gallatin/misc/hunt.c) Breaking into the debugger, I see this: db> ps pid proc addr uid ppid pgrp flag stat wmesg wchan cmd 359 d45f7520 d6dd1000 1387 321 359 004006 3 vmwait c02ce678 ahunt.x86 321 d45f7380 d6dd5000 1387 320 321 2004082 3 opause d6dd5108 tcsh 320 d45f71e0 d6dd8000 0 142 320 084080 2 rlogind 316 d45f76c0 d6dcd000 1387 313 316 000186 3 piperd d6d537a0 vmware 315 d45f7040 d6ddb000 1387 313 315 000106 3 inode c1880c00 vmware 314 d45f7a00 d6dc6000 1387 313 314 000186 3 piperd d6d53de0 vmware 313 d45f7d40 d6dbf000 1387 216 313 004186 3 piperd d6d53c00 vmware 256 d45f7860 d6dc9000 1387 255 256 004082 3 ttyin c188ca28 tcsh 255 d45f7ba0 d6dc1000 0 142 255 004080 3 select c02cc1ac rlogind 235 d45f8220 d6da2000 1387 234 235 004106 3 vmwait c02ce678 systat 234 d45f7ee0 d6db6000 1387 216 234 004106 3 vmwait c02ce678 xterm 216 d45f9c20 d6d6d000 1387 215 216 2004082 3 opause d6d6d108 tcsh 215 d45f83c0 d6d9f000 0 142 215 004080 3 select c02cc1ac rlogind 208 d45fa5e0 d6d4b000 0 1 208 084082 2 getty 203 d45f8080 d6da5000 0 1 203 000080 3 select c02cc1ac sshd1 144 d45f8560 d6d9b000 0 1 144 080480 2 cron 142 d45f8d80 d6d8a000 0 1 142 000080 3 select c02cc1ac inetd 125 d45f8700 d6d96000 0 1 120 000080 3 nfsidl c02ce4ec nfsiod 124 d45f88a0 d6d93000 0 1 120 000080 3 nfsidl c02ce4e8 nfsiod 123 d45f8a40 d6d90000 0 1 120 000080 3 nfsidl c02ce4e4 nfsiod 122 d45f8be0 d6d8d000 0 1 120 000080 3 nfsidl c02ce4e0 nfsiod 118 d45f95a0 d6d7a000 0 1 118 000080 3 select c02cc1ac rpc.statd 117 d45f8f20 d6d86000 0 1 112 000080 3 nfsd c188ce00 nfsd 116 d45f90c0 d6d83000 0 1 112 000080 3 nfsd c1874000 nfsd 115 d45f9260 d6d80000 0 1 112 000080 3 nfsd c1874200 nfsd 114 d45f9400 d6d7d000 0 1 112 000080 3 nfsd c1874400 nfsd 110 d45f9740 d6d77000 0 1 110 000080 3 select c02cc1ac mountd 104 d45f98e0 d6d73000 0 1 104 080480 2 ypbind 102 d45f9a80 d6d70000 1 1 102 000180 3 select c02cc1ac portmap 99 d45f9dc0 d6d6a000 0 1 99 000004 3 vmwait c02ce678 ntpd 93 d45f9f60 d6d5c000 0 1 93 080080 2 syslogd 29 d45fa2a0 d6d55000 0 1 29 2000080 3 pause d6d55108 adjkerntz 22 d45fa100 d6d58000 0 1 22 000004 3 vmwait c02ce678 mount_mfs 5 d45fa780 d4607000 0 0 0 000204 3 syncer c02cc148 syncer 4 d45fa920 d4605000 0 0 0 100204 3 psleep c02b6cb8 bufdaemon 3 d45faac0 d4603000 0 0 0 000204 3 psleep c02c24e0 vmdaemon 2 d45fac60 d4601000 0 0 0 100204 3 biord cbf00540 pagedaemon 1 d45fae00 d45ff000 0 0 1 004284 3 wait d45fae00 init 0 c02cb540 c0333000 0 0 0 000204 3 vmwait c02ce678 swapper db> show page cnt.v_free_count: 345 cnt.v_cache_count: 303 cnt.v_inactive_count: 7286 cnt.v_active_count: 100686 cnt.v_wire_count: 19981 cnt.v_free_reserved: 345 cnt.v_free_min: 986 cnt.v_free_target: 3303 cnt.v_cache_min: 3303 cnt.v_inactive_target: 4954 db> call dumpsys() From the dump, I see that vmware's (the thread blocked on inode) kernel stack looks like: (kgdb) proc 0xd45f7040 (kgdb) bt #0 mi_switch () at ../../kern/kern_synch.c:859 #1 0xc0156aa9 in tsleep (ident=0xc1880c00, priority=8, wmesg=0xc02669a2 "inode", timo=0) at ../../kern/kern_synch.c:468 #2 0xc014ef44 in acquire (lkp=0xc1880c00, extflags=16777280, wanted=1792) at ../../kern/kern_lock.c:147 #3 0xc014eff4 in lockmgr (lkp=0xc1880c00, flags=16973889, interlkp=0xd6db3bcc, p=0xd45f7040) at ../../kern/kern_lock.c:227 #4 0xc017a7e4 in vop_stdlock (ap=0xd6ddce40) at ../../kern/vfs_default.c:231 #5 0xc01f4c29 in ufs_vnoperate (ap=0xd6ddce40) at ../../ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c:2283 #6 0xc01844ab in vn_lock (vp=0xd6db3b60, flags=16973889, p=0xd45f7040) at vnode_if.h:840 #7 0xc017d407 in vget (vp=0xd6db3b60, flags=16908353, p=0xd45f7040) at ../../kern/vfs_subr.c:1390 #8 0xc0202fac in vnode_pager_lock (object=0xd6daf780) at ../../vm/vnode_pager.c:978 #9 0xc01f6b03 in vm_fault (map=0xd45fc5c0, vaddr=713601024, fault_type=3 '\003', fault_flags=8) at ../../vm/vm_fault.c:253 #10 0xc023cc42 in trap_pfault (frame=0xd6ddcfa8, usermode=1, eva=713601024) at ../../i386/i386/trap.c:797 #11 0xc023c737 in trap (frame={tf_fs = 137297967, tf_es = 47, tf_ds = -1078001617, tf_edi = 713601024, tf_esi = 137406384, tf_ebp = -1077941076, tf_isp = -690106412, tf_ebx = 8, tf_edx = 713601024, tf_ecx = 1024, tf_eax = 4096, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 6, tf_eip = 675258647, tf_cs = 31, tf_eflags = 78342, tf_esp = -1077941084, tf_ss = 47}) at ../../i386/i386/trap.c:346 (kgdb) frame 2 #2 0xc014ef44 in acquire (lkp=0xc1880c00, extflags=16777280, wanted=1792) at ../../kern/kern_lock.c:147 147 in ../../kern/kern_lock.c (kgdb) p *lkp $2 = { lk_interlock = { lock_data = 0 }, lk_flags = 2098240, lk_sharecount = 0, lk_waitcount = 1, lk_exclusivecount = 1, lk_prio = 8, lk_wmesg = 0xc02669a2 "inode", lk_timo = 0, lk_lockholder = 2 } And the pagedaemon looks like: (kgdb) proc 0xd45fac60 (kgdb) bt #0 mi_switch () at ../../kern/kern_synch.c:859 #1 0xc0156aa9 in tsleep (ident=0xcbf00540, priority=16, wmesg=0xc025b589 "biord", timo=0) at ../../kern/kern_synch.c:468 #2 0xc0177873 in biowait (bp=0xcbf00540) at ../../kern/vfs_bio.c:2654 #3 0xc017510b in bread (vp=0xd6db3b60, blkno=808, size=8192, cred=0x0, bpp=0xd4602cbc) at ../../kern/vfs_bio.c:515 #4 0xc01e4f15 in ffs_balloc (ap=0xd4602d7c) at ../../ufs/ffs/ffs_balloc.c:327 #5 0xc01edbc1 in ffs_write (ap=0xd4602dcc) at vnode_if.h:1035 #6 0xc0202efa in vnode_pager_generic_putpages (vp=0xd6db3b60, m=0xd4602edc, bytecount=8192, flags=0, rtvals=0xd4602e70) at vnode_if.h:363 #7 0xc01ee1ce in ffs_putpages (ap=0xd4602e34) at ../../ufs/ufs/ufs_readwrite.c:677 #8 0xc0202d56 in vnode_pager_putpages (object=0xd6daf780, m=0xd4602edc, count=2, sync=0, rtvals=0xd4602e70) at vnode_if.h:1126 #9 0xc01ffeba in vm_pageout_flush (mc=0xd4602edc, count=2, flags=0) at ../../vm/vm_pager.h:145 #10 0xc01ffe1d in vm_pageout_clean (m=0xc0ae7ff0) at ../../vm/vm_pageout.c:338 #11 0xc020073e in vm_pageout_scan () at ../../vm/vm_pageout.c:914 #12 0xc0201034 in vm_pageout () at ../../vm/vm_pageout.c:1350 #13 0xc0231740 in fork_trampoline () Hmm.. why is it stuck there? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Andrew Gallatin, Sr Systems Programmer http://www.cs.duke.edu/~gallatin Duke University Email: gallatin@cs.duke.edu Department of Computer Science Phone: (919) 660-6590 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 31 9:28:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6AC137BCFC for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:28:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA29464; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:28:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:28:35 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200003311728.JAA29464@apollo.backplane.com> To: Andrew Gallatin Cc: nsayer@kfu.com, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VMware locks FreeBSD 4.0 solid References: <38E3FB31.3DD4D170@sftw.com> <14564.53252.962047.551231@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org :I'm running VMware 2.0 & FreeBSD 4.0-RELEASE. The host is a 512MB :450MHz PIII, vmware is configured to use 64MB. : :If I run a synthetic program to apply memory pressure to the system, I :can lock the machine solid within minutes. :(app is ftp://ftp.cs.duke.edu/pub/gallatin/misc/hunt.c) : :Breaking into the debugger, I see this: : :db> ps : pid proc addr uid ppid pgrp flag stat wmesg wchan cmd : 359 d45f7520 d6dd1000 1387 321 359 004006 3 vmwait c02ce678 ahunt.x86 : 315 d45f7040 d6ddb000 1387 313 315 000106 3 inode c1880c00 vmware : 235 d45f8220 d6da2000 1387 234 235 004106 3 vmwait c02ce678 systat : 234 d45f7ee0 d6db6000 1387 216 234 004106 3 vmwait c02ce678 xterm : 99 d45f9dc0 d6d6a000 0 1 99 000004 3 vmwait c02ce678 ntpd : 22 d45fa100 d6d58000 0 1 22 000004 3 vmwait c02ce678 mount_mfs : 2 d45fac60 d4601000 0 0 0 100204 3 biord cbf00540 pagedaemon : 0 c02cb540 c0333000 0 0 0 000204 3 vmwait c02ce678 swapper : :db> show page :cnt.v_free_count: 345 :cnt.v_cache_count: 303 :... :cnt.v_free_reserved: 345 :cnt.v_free_min: 986 Ok, the system is low on pages, which accounts for the vmwait's The pagedaemon is stuck in biord, and that is definitely a problem. The question is: What mount point is that read coming off of? I suspect that the pagedaemon is trying to do a biord off the MFS filesystem and the MFS filesystem is locked up in vmwait. With the pagedaemon waiting for MFS and MFS waiting for free pages, the system winds up deadlocked. Can you try tracing out what mount that biord is operating on? And also what is the MFS process doing (traceback)? If that turns out to be it, try turning off the MFS filesystem and see if you can lock it up. :... : at ../../vm/vm_pager.h:145 :#10 0xc01ffe1d in vm_pageout_clean (m=0xc0ae7ff0) at ../../vm/vm_pageout.c:338 :#11 0xc020073e in vm_pageout_scan () at ../../vm/vm_pageout.c:914 :#12 0xc0201034 in vm_pageout () at ../../vm/vm_pageout.c:1350 :#13 0xc0231740 in fork_trampoline () : :Hmm.. why is it stuck there? : :------------------------------------------------------------------------------ :Andrew Gallatin, Sr Systems Programmer http://www.cs.duke.edu/~gallatin :Duke University Email: gallatin@cs.duke.edu :Department of Computer Science Phone: (919) 660-6590 The pageout daemon assumes that it can page things out to vnodes. The problem is that I am guessing MFS needs some metadata (the biord the pageout daemon is stuck in) which it is trying to read in before being able to do the pageout. The pageout daemon is marked as being a special process and can eat into our free page reserve, but the MFS process is not (and generally can't be) marked that way. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 31 9:45:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2E437B52C for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:45:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (doug@master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA70889; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:44:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <38E4E417.F7B68784@gorean.org> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 09:44:55 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT-0325 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Wemm Cc: Akinori -Aki- MUSHA , freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: networking vmware References: <20000331071416.BBCCA1CD7@overcee.netplex.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Peter Wemm wrote: > > Doug Barton wrote: > > Akinori -Aki- MUSHA wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > At 31 Mar 2000 04:01:58 +0200, > > > Palle Girgensohn wrote: > > > > How am I supposed to get vmware to network? > > > > > > Currently only "host-only" networking is supported. > > > > What does this mean exactly? If I'm running freebsd, and running window > s > > in vmware, will the windows apps have access to the network? > > Well, the "contained" environment only has direct access to the host.. > However, the host can route or bridge or nat via other methods... > > If you give the vmnet interface a valid routable address you can set your > freebsd host to do ipforwarding and set up your routes and it'll work as > though it was a small ethernet with a real box on the other end instead of > an emulated system. OK, that's good news. I'm already doing natd at home so I should be able to set that up. Domo arigato to MUSHA-san for his response as well. Doug -- "So, the cows were part of a dream that dreamed itself into existence? Is that possible?" asked the student incredulously. The master simply replied, "Mu." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 31 10: 0:31 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from guardian.sftw.com (guardian.sftw.com [209.157.37.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EAC637B953 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:00:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@sftw.com) Received: from yoda.sftw.com (yoda.sftw.com [209.157.37.211]) by guardian.sftw.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA90019; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:00:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@sftw.com) Received: from sftw.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yoda.sftw.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA02143; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:00:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@sftw.com) Message-ID: <38E4E7B5.7B74D31C@sftw.com> Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:00:22 -0800 From: Nick Sayer Reply-To: nsayer@kfu.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Dillon Cc: Andrew Gallatin , freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VMware locks FreeBSD 4.0 solid References: <38E3FB31.3DD4D170@sftw.com> <14564.53252.962047.551231@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200003311728.JAA29464@apollo.backplane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org For what it's worth, in my case, mfs is no longer part of the picture. [...] > I suspect that the pagedaemon is trying to do a biord off the MFS > filesystem and the MFS filesystem is locked up in vmwait. With the > pagedaemon waiting for MFS and MFS waiting for free pages, the system > winds up deadlocked. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 31 10:19:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57B837B693 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:19:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id KAA30357; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:19:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:19:27 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200003311819.KAA30357@apollo.backplane.com> To: Nick Sayer Cc: Andrew Gallatin , freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VMware locks FreeBSD 4.0 solid References: <38E3FB31.3DD4D170@sftw.com> <14564.53252.962047.551231@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200003311728.JAA29464@apollo.backplane.com> <38E4E7B5.7B74D31C@sftw.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org : : :For what it's worth, in my case, mfs is no longer part of the picture. : :[...] Can you break into DDB when it locks up and do a 'ps'? -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 31 10:48:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE51337BD88 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 10:48:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA20410; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 13:48:00 -0500 (EST) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) id NAA04743; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 13:47:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 13:47:30 -0500 (EST) To: Matthew Dillon Cc: Andrew Gallatin , nsayer@kfu.com, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VMware locks FreeBSD 4.0 solid In-Reply-To: <200003311728.JAA29464@apollo.backplane.com> References: <38E3FB31.3DD4D170@sftw.com> <14564.53252.962047.551231@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200003311728.JAA29464@apollo.backplane.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: <14564.61764.852285.849013@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Matthew Dillon writes: > The pagedaemon is stuck in biord, and that is definitely a problem. > The question is: What mount point is that read coming off of? > > I suspect that the pagedaemon is trying to do a biord off the MFS > filesystem and the MFS filesystem is locked up in vmwait. With the > pagedaemon waiting for MFS and MFS waiting for free pages, the system > winds up deadlocked. Bingo! It was MFS! > Can you try tracing out what mount that biord is operating on? And (kgdb) p vp->v_mount->mnt_stat->f_mntonname $6 = "/tmp", '\000' (kgdb) p vp->v_mount->mnt_stat->f_fstypename $7 = "mfs", '\000' > also what is the MFS process doing (traceback)? (kgdb) proc 0xd45fa100 (kgdb) bt #0 mi_switch () at ../../kern/kern_synch.c:859 #1 0xc0156aa9 in tsleep (ident=0xc02ce678, priority=4, wmesg=0xc0268369 "vmwait", timo=0) at ../../kern/kern_synch.c:468 #2 0xc01febb7 in vm_wait () at ../../vm/vm_page.c:880 #3 0xc01f6a5c in vm_fault (map=0xd45fdc40, vaddr=151269376, fault_type=3 '\003', fault_flags=8) at ../../vm/vm_fault.c:364 #4 0xc023cc42 in trap_pfault (frame=0xd6d59d78, usermode=0, eva=151269376) at ../../i386/i386/trap.c:797 #5 0xc023c85f in trap (frame={tf_fs = -873594864, tf_es = -1071120368, tf_ds = -873594864, tf_edi = 151269376, tf_esi = -778469376, tf_ebp = -690643472, tf_isp = -690643548, tf_ebx = 65536, tf_edx = -1049541056, tf_ecx = 4096, tf_eax = 151285760, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = -1071400839, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66054, tf_esp = -873554632, tf_ss = -873554632}) at ../../i386/i386/trap.c:423 #6 0xc023b879 in generic_copyout () #7 0xc01ee844 in mfs_start (mp=0xc17fea00, flags=0, p=0xd45fa100) at ../../ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c:344 #8 0xc017f131 in mount (p=0xd45fa100, uap=0xd6d59f80) at ../../kern/vfs_syscalls.c:344 <..> I'll try running w/o MFS & let you know what happens. Drew ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Andrew Gallatin, Sr Systems Programmer http://www.cs.duke.edu/~gallatin Duke University Email: gallatin@cs.duke.edu Department of Computer Science Phone: (919) 660-6590 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 31 11:45:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from msk1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF59737B933 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 11:45:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from edon@mail.ru) Received: from f4.int ([10.0.0.51] helo=f4.mail.ru) by msk1.mail.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #116) id 12b7Sj-000NpT-00; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 23:52:09 +0400 Received: from mail by f4.mail.ru with local (Exim 3.02 #112) id 12b7NM-000EeC-00; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 23:46:36 +0400 Received: from [194.44.184.178] by koi.mail.ru with HTTP; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 19:46:36 +0000 (GMT) From: "Eugene Don" To: "Rashid N. Achilov" Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re[2]: rundos Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: unknown via proxy [194.44.184.178] In-Reply-To: Reply-To: "Eugene Don" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 23:46:36 +0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Rundos is a emulator for dos. Man doscmd in FreeBSD 3.3 From: "Rashid N. Achilov" To: Eugene Don Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2000 19:21:47 +0600 (NOVT) Subject: RE: rundos > > On 06-Mar-00 Eugene Don wrote: > > I am using subj, and will be happy if you continue work with him. > > > > What is subj? Where can I find more info about it? > -- > With Best Regards. > Rashid N. Achilov (RNA1-RIPE), Cert. ID: 28514, Granch Ltd. lead engineer > e-mail: achilov@granch.ru, tel (383-2) 24-2363 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 31 12:28: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7885D37B944 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 12:27:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA24353; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 15:27:31 -0500 (EST) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) id PAA04892; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 15:27:01 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 15:27:01 -0500 (EST) To: Matthew Dillon Cc: nsayer@kfu.com, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VMware locks FreeBSD 4.0 solid In-Reply-To: <200003311728.JAA29464@apollo.backplane.com> References: <38E3FB31.3DD4D170@sftw.com> <14564.53252.962047.551231@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200003311728.JAA29464@apollo.backplane.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: <14565.2133.162680.554248@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org To follow up: Taking MFS out of the picture seems to clear up the problems. I've been beating the heck out of it for a while now, and the system is still stable. Excellent diagnosis, Matt! VMware seems to look at the TMPDIR env variable, so I'll be making sure to set that to /var/tmp before running VMware ;-) I wonder if they just started doing this (mmapping a large file in $TMDIR) in 2.0? I was running a demo of 1.x with no problems a few months back... Thanks, Drew ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Andrew Gallatin, Sr Systems Programmer http://www.cs.duke.edu/~gallatin Duke University Email: gallatin@cs.duke.edu Department of Computer Science Phone: (919) 660-6590 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 31 13:29:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from gw.errno.com (node-d1d4bd7a.powerinter.net [209.212.189.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D0A37B53A for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 13:29:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from MELANGE (melange.errno.com [209.212.166.36]) by gw.errno.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id NAA15687; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 13:28:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <073401bf9b57$83dd1f30$0132a8c0@MELANGE> From: "Sam Leffler" To: "Andrew Gallatin" , "Matthew Dillon" Cc: , References: <38E3FB31.3DD4D170@sftw.com><14564.53252.962047.551231@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu><200003311728.JAA29464@apollo.backplane.com> <14565.2133.162680.554248@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Subject: Re: VMware locks FreeBSD 4.0 solid Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 13:24:36 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I wonder if they just started doing this (mmapping a large file in > $TMDIR) in 2.0? I was running a demo of 1.x with no problems a few > months back... > The mmap'd file has been used "forever". Sam To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 31 16: 9:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from hurricane.columbus.rr.com (m5.columbus.rr.com [204.210.252.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE6437B6BA for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 16:09:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from caa@columbus.rr.com) Received: from columbus.rr.com ([204.210.243.142]) by hurricane.columbus.rr.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-53939U80000L80000S0V35) with ESMTP id com; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 19:09:49 -0500 Received: (from caa@localhost) by columbus.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA13268; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 19:09:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from caa) Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 19:09:37 -0500 From: "Charles Anderson" To: "Nawfal M. Rouyan" Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: vmware2 problem Message-ID: <20000331190937.A13072@midgard.dhs.org> References: <20000331164818.19589.qmail@web1602.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20000331164818.19589.qmail@web1602.mail.yahoo.com>; from op4l@yahoo.com on Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 08:48:18AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Do you have LD_LIBRARY_PATH set? If so get rid of it and make sure that your ldconfig_paths are set correctly in rc.conf (ldconfig -r should list your ld cache). The linux ld cache is setup by the install, but /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig -p should list it, and you should see libm..?? whatever there. I ran around this problem for a week, uninstalled and reinstalled everything. It was my LD_LIBRARY_PATH I had added for /usr/local/pilot/lib that had hosed me up. -Charlie On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 08:48:18AM -0800, Nawfal M. Rouyan wrote: > I do have /compat/linux but it still do not find the > appropriate libraries. But ldd /usr/local/bin/vmware > is ok. I realized this because vmware also dumps core > when I press the power on button. > Then I execute gdb and find that it fails to find the > /lib/libNoVersion.so.1 which I have in my system under > /compat/linux/lib directory. > Then I tried creating a directory /lib and make a link > to /compat/linux/lib/libNoVersion.so.1 in /lib. I > tried executing vmware and when I pressed power on > button, it dumps core again. I execute gdb and it > states that it can't find the libm..?? which is exists > in my /compat/linux/lib bypassing the check for > libNoVersion.so.1. This makes me think that it didn't > search the /compat/linux directory first when I > execute it. > The question is should I install again the linux_base > port though linux-netscape works fine? Even Linux's > Realplayer 7 beta works fine. This makes me wonder > because I've installed reinstalled vmware for a number > of times but the same things still occurs. > > Thanks ;-) > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. > http://im.yahoo.com > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message -- Charles Anderson caa@columbus.rr.com No quote, no nothin' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 31 16:41:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FD337B6EE for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 16:41:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id QAA35417; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 16:41:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2000 16:41:41 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200004010041.QAA35417@apollo.backplane.com> To: Andrew Gallatin Cc: nsayer@kfu.com, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VMware locks FreeBSD 4.0 solid References: <38E3FB31.3DD4D170@sftw.com> <14564.53252.962047.551231@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200003311728.JAA29464@apollo.backplane.com> <14565.2133.162680.554248@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org :To follow up: Taking MFS out of the picture seems to clear up the :problems. I've been beating the heck out of it for a while now, and :the system is still stable. Excellent diagnosis, Matt! : :VMware seems to look at the TMPDIR env variable, so I'll be making :sure to set that to /var/tmp before running VMware ;-) : :I wonder if they just started doing this (mmapping a large file in :$TMDIR) in 2.0? I was running a demo of 1.x with no problems a few :months back... : :Thanks, : :Drew : :------------------------------------------------------------------------------ :Andrew Gallatin, Sr Systems Programmer http://www.cs.duke.edu/~gallatin It isn't really MFS's fault, and I am sure there are other situations that will lock up the same way. The issue is that we are getting a low-memory deadlock. Perhaps VMWare is wiring too many pages or something like that... I don't know yet. I think Nick's problem is different from the one you were encountering. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri Mar 31 21:19:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0529637BBBB for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2000 21:19:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA05165; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 00:19:43 -0500 (EST) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) id AAA12738; Sat, 1 Apr 2000 00:19:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) From: Andrew Gallatin MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2000 00:19:12 -0500 (EST) To: Matthew Dillon Cc: Andrew Gallatin , nsayer@kfu.com, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VMware locks FreeBSD 4.0 solid In-Reply-To: <200004010041.QAA35417@apollo.backplane.com> References: <38E3FB31.3DD4D170@sftw.com> <14564.53252.962047.551231@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200003311728.JAA29464@apollo.backplane.com> <14565.2133.162680.554248@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200004010041.QAA35417@apollo.backplane.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: <14565.34363.113650.743338@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Matthew Dillon writes: > It isn't really MFS's fault, and I am sure there are other situations > that will lock up the same way. > > The issue is that we are getting a low-memory deadlock. Perhaps VMWare > is wiring too many pages or something like that... I don't know yet. That was my first thought. It keeps something like 75MB wired. On my desktop (only 192MB) that's a sizeable fraction. > I think Nick's problem is different from the one you were encountering. Yes, probably. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message