From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 00:08:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B87C16A41A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:08:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kelly.terry.jones@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B51713C45B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:08:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kelly.terry.jones@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so2213405pyb.10 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:08:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=UKpaENt3obqOOe/pccCMLGYyIRrsT9tk+EThDw4vfJA=; b=PcuxhXZoGGwW/+jvonn7/d0RdzwjW9nJwz27rbklgluXxgahzdh8hWMqZggeMrahhyZhNee7U07QzA3iS3ZnVbCFbzi41K4mCPDvlF7/eEHTnq1ti5dGdsgyoiizRcFsjQPn6HBYUJyPduEF1lS6Uw8R3yqzdtDAA4SRhkzw2Ps= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=Qo/ArFlNUVZFDl5DmRHpODFDICRHFfFXnfDpP7cPFq63eywkUWCzUiSDKnvS29vkxMsUKqCOU/3liBiRS0m0UfO9gqWEb4LRdjPtFd9a+yPb/4tcv06+YGuj5ngbAfcCiP5n8fITvZLwZcOpvzJJRjSUoKFyjm0GFQp23P+DPRE= Received: by 10.35.116.12 with SMTP id t12mr5737511pym.52.1200786086693; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:41:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.97.1 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:41:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <26face530801191541i60740ba3g5dd5ba24dbaadf39@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 16:41:26 -0700 From: "Kelly Jones" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Recovering data from a newfs filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:08:17 -0000 Months ago, I got a new USB drive for my Mac OS X, did "newfs /dev/disk1" on it, and it's been working fine. I then foolishly did "disklabel -create /dev/disk1", which broke it. How can I recover my data? I've tried fsck w/ alternate superblocks to no avail. "less -f /dev/disk1" shows me the disk label I created: Base 131072 Size 500107730944 but also shows me my file names/content, so I'm convinced the data is still there. How do I recover my data? I assume newfs creates a UFS by default? Can I "decode" /dev/disk1 the way one might decode a TAR file? Posting here because I know Mac OS X is "FreeBSD inside". -- We're just a Bunch Of Regular Guys, a collective group that's trying to understand and assimilate technology. We feel that resistance to new ideas and technology is unwise and ultimately futile. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 00:15:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E417F16A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from esmtp.webtent.net (esmtp.webtent.net [208.38.145.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28CB13C455 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with ESMTP id 194AB7FD89 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:15:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from esmtp.webtent.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.webtent.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 37957-02 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:15:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from [70.110.70.43] (columbus.webtent.org [70.110.70.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Gateway) with ESMTP id BD51F7FD87 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:15:05 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Fitzpatrick To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain Organization: WebTent Networking, Inc. Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:15:15 -0500 Message-Id: <1200788115.9650.13.camel@columbus.webtent.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: WebTent Mailguard 1.0.2a Subject: compiling kernel with PAE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: robert@webtent.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:15:15 -0000 Getting an error when trying to compile a kernel on 5.4 and 6.2 with the PAE option. I've tried NO_MODULES in make.conf as well... se2 -ffreestanding -Werror /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c: In function `adv_action': /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c:260: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WEBTENT. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. This is a custom kernel build with the QUOTA option, I take out the PAE option and all makes fine. I did a src-all update with RELENG_VER tag prior to building. I assume this is a driver issue compatible with PAE? Also, can I run amd64 release on this Intel Xeon dual proc with 6GB RAM? Thinking about loading 6.3 amd64 if possible. Excuse my ignorance, I am not a hardware guy, I am a programmer. CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz (3000.12-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x641d> AMD Features=0x20100000 Logical CPUs per core: 2 -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 00:22:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F9E16A41B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:22:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SK=d329cc7e@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280BE13C474 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:22:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SK=d329cc7e@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B781CD05AF for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:22:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:22:09 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080120002209.04e18225@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <70F64C4A-51CB-4301-B7C5-200FD8D5BC41@mac.com> References: <70F64C4A-51CB-4301-B7C5-200FD8D5BC41@mac.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: portupgrade: the -P options rarely works X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:22:25 -0000 On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:35:42 +0100 Giorgio Valoti wrote: > Hi all, > I=E2=80=99ve noticed that using the -P option with portupgrade, which sho= uld =20 > try to fetch the binary version of a package rarely works. Most of =20 > the times it tries to fetch the package from the freebsd site, it =20 > fails and then proceed to build it from the sources. > While I can expect from to time that a pre-compiled version of a =20 > package to be unavailable, it surprises me to see this so many times. Are you aware that you need to pick-up stable packages, rather than release packages, for portupgrade -P to work properly? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 00:23:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2737616A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:23:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SK=d329cc7e@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEACC13C469 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:23:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SK=d329cc7e@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE7F163F80 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:00:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B941D05AE for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:00:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:00:48 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080120000048.0cee1189@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801191142r51a7715by99e56ee658621e5d@mail.gmail.com> References: <94136a2c0801191142r51a7715by99e56ee658621e5d@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 6.2-Release to 6.3-Release and automatically merge changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:23:41 -0000 On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:42:57 +0100 "Zbigniew Szalbot" wrote: > Hello, > > Encouraged by an apparent ease of use of FreeBSD update utility to go > to 6.3 I decided to perform the update on an office machine, too. I > issued: > > $ sh freebsd-update.sh -f freebsd-update.conf -r 6.3-RELEASE upgrade > > and after some time there came a screen like this: > > Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. > > The following file could not be merged automatically: > /etc/defaults/periodic.conf Anything in /etc/defaults/ should not have been edited, so just accept the new version. If you *have* edited it, you'll have to handle this manually, and put you changes in the right place. > # $FreeBSD: src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf,v 1.33.2.3.2.1 2007/12/06 > 08:11:19 jhb Exp $ > >>>>>>> 6.3-RELEASE > > Now, I can't be 100% certain but I think I have never touched > periodic.conf and not really sure how to progress on from here. This is also in /etc/defaults/, it's not the normal periodic.conf, so see above. > Another example is rc.conf which of course I edited in the past adding > various services as needed. > > <<<<<<< current version > ======= > #background_dhclient_fxp0="YES" # Start dhcp client on fxp0 in the > background. synchronous_dhclient="YES" # Start dhclient directly > on configured # interfaces during startup. > >>>>>>> 6.3-RELEASE If we are talking about /etc/rc.conf (rather than /etc/defaults/rc.conf) then keep the old version as this file is empty by default. > Then it asked about sendmail files which I have never ever touched (I > do not use sendmail). Some others are not sendmail-related but I have > not touched them either. Accept the new versions. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 01:18:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66C416A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:18:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noc@hdk5.net) Received: from guam10.hdk5.net (guam10.hdk5.net [66.180.132.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7592C13C448 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:18:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noc@hdk5.net) Received: from [192.168.1.29] (unknown [66.180.149.18]) by guam10.hdk5.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDFE5C22; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:21:28 -1000 (HST) Message-ID: <4792A17E.9060208@hdk5.net> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:18:54 -1000 From: NetOpsCenter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061211 FreeBSD/i386 SeaMonkey/1.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Mars References: <47928642.2090707@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <47928642.2090707@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Realtek 8111B LAN Chipset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: noc@hdk5.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:18:55 -0000 Greg Mars wrote: > I'm buying parts for a computer and want to make sure that the core > components are as freebsd friendly as possible. So far, I've decided > on a core 2 quad q6600 and I'm choosing the motherboard now. However > it seems many of the popular motherboards have Realtek ALC888 as > built-in audio and Realtek 8111B as built-in LAN. > I read at: > > http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/CURRENT/hardware/i386/article.html > > that the sound should work but I couldn't find any info on the LAN. > Does anyone on the list have any experience with it? > > By the way, I'm going to run FreeBSD 7. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Aloha, Realtek 8169 is a 1000 M and works on 7.* and 8.* I think 8111 maybe old 100M ? Are you sure about the Realtek model #? ~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740 + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org + noc@hdk5.net + + http://aloha50.net - Supporting - FreeBSD 6.* - 7.* + "All that's really worth doing is what we do for others."- Lewis Carrol From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 01:26:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7791F16A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:26:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq@peterk.org) Received: from poshta.pknet.net (poshta.pknet.net [216.241.167.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1248F13C46A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq@peterk.org) Received: (qmail 31070 invoked by uid 98); 20 Jan 2008 01:28:13 -0000 Received: from 216.241.167.213 by poshta.pknet.net (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.91.2/5145. spamassassin: 3.2.3. Clear:RC:1(216.241.167.213):. Processed in 0.058721 secs); 20 Jan 2008 01:28:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.pknet.net) (216.241.167.213) by poshta.pknet.net with SMTP; 20 Jan 2008 01:28:13 -0000 Received: from 216.241.167.208 (SquirrelMail authenticated user fbsdq@peterk.org) by webmail.pknet.net with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:28:13 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <3834.216.241.167.208.1200792493.squirrel@webmail.pknet.net> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:28:13 -0700 (MST) From: "Peter" To: "Kelly Jones" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recovering data from a newfs filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:26:11 -0000 try 'testdisk' mailds:#cat /usr/ports/sysutils/testdisk/pkg-descr Tool to check and undelete partition Works with the following partitions: - FAT12 FAT16 FAT32 - Linux EXT2/EXT3 - Linux SWAP (version 1 and 2) - NTFS (Windows NT/W2K/XP) - BeFS (BeOS) - UFS (BSD) - Netware - ReiserFS TestDisk is under GNU Public License. You can compile it under Dos with DJGPP or under Linux or BSD with gcc. WWW: http://www.cgsecurity.org/ - Florent Thoumie flz@xbsd.org ]Peter[ > Months ago, I got a new USB drive for my Mac OS X, did "newfs > /dev/disk1" on it, and it's been working fine. > > I then foolishly did "disklabel -create /dev/disk1", which broke > it. How can I recover my data? I've tried fsck w/ alternate > superblocks to no avail. > > "less -f /dev/disk1" shows me the disk label I created: > > > "http://www.apple\ > .com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd"> > > > Base > 131072 > Size > 500107730944 > > > > but also shows me my file names/content, so I'm convinced the data is > still there. > > How do I recover my data? I assume newfs creates a UFS by default? Can > I "decode" /dev/disk1 the way one might decode a TAR file? > > Posting here because I know Mac OS X is "FreeBSD inside". > > -- > We're just a Bunch Of Regular Guys, a collective group that's trying > to understand and assimilate technology. We feel that resistance to > new ideas and technology is unwise and ultimately futile. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 01:37:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A454316A41B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:37:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=YZz788=SK=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailout11.yourhostingaccount.com (mailout11.yourhostingaccount.com [65.254.253.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2F713C46B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:37:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=YZz788=SK=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailscan21.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.15.21] helo=mailscan21.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailout11.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1JGOeW-0007we-AU for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:07:12 -0500 Received: from impout02.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.55.2] helo=impout02.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailscan21.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1JGOeW-0007sB-3m; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:07:12 -0500 Received: from authsmtp08.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.8]) by impout02.yourhostingaccount.com with NO UCE id fD7B1Y0040ASqTN0000000; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:07:11 -0500 X-EN-OrigOutIP: 10.1.18.8 X-EN-IMPSID: fD7B1Y0040ASqTN0000000 Received: from c-98-206-161-17.hsd1.il.comcast.net ([98.206.161.17] helo=vixen42) by authsmtp08.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtpa (Exim) id 1JGOeV-0000DO-S2; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:07:11 -0500 Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:08:07 -0600 From: "Zane C.B." To: Modulok Message-ID: <20080119190807.2e130460@vixen42> In-Reply-To: <64c038660801040516u5c42a6cpadb475ad67fb4730@mail.gmail.com> References: <64c038660801040516u5c42a6cpadb475ad67fb4730@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EN-UserInfo: 0d1ca1697cdb7a831d4877828571b7ab:1570f0de6936c69fef9e164fffc541bc X-EN-AuthUser: vvelox2 Sender: "Zane C.B." X-EN-OrigIP: 98.206.161.17 X-EN-OrigHost: c-98-206-161-17.hsd1.il.comcast.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Opera, Flash and the stench of failure... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:37:20 -0000 On Fri, 4 Jan 2008 06:16:59 -0700 Modulok wrote: > Seeing the thread about flash with mozilla, I thought, "a flash > plugin with opera would be cool." Last night I tried to get flash > working with opera. I failed. With native opera, I cannot get any > plugins to work. Here is what I know: > > 1. What opera bitches about: > Could not start operapluginwrapper. > Plugins will not work correctly. > > 2. Why opera bitches: > ldd operapluginwrapper; > ... > libXThrStub.so.6 => not found (0x0) > ... > > 3. Why it is missing: > "On OpenBSD, and on old FreeBSD, libc lacks pthread stubs. > This is a problem because libX11 needs to support threading, > but shouldn't cause all X programs to be linked against the > threading library. The solution is libXThrStub (UIThrStubs.c), > which provides weak symbols to stub threading functions, > which are ignored if the application links against the thread > library. I had moved libXThrStub into libX11, because it > seemed unnecessary." > > 4. What I have installed: > linux-flashplugin-9.0r115 Adobe Flash Player NPAPI Plugin > opera-9.25.20071214 A blazingly fast, full-featured, > standards-compliant browse > opera-linuxplugins-9.21.20070510_1 Linux plugin support for the > native Opera browser > > Does anyone have flash working with opera? If so, how? Where can I > get libXThrStub.so.6? My suggestion is to check out 'graphics/gnash'. That port works surprisingly well for part these days. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 01:55:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5962A16A419 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:55:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from celso.vianna@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970E013C45D for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:55:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from celso.vianna@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so1458661rvb.43 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:55:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=fcOe2pQJYqi1hxXTfX50wM6PWA+zwa6cl6jVddsibyw=; b=TFxiDYkqsjQuFZhUDr8qYRZiAjovB+UF+C3Kftpjdig2XmxF7jKV5+N+jn8NINVDXk4pnCmIottWbae1Taog3VCXxVv3CsTcLNlk8R0nAAjl9oNx2jNcgRpJTb2LNeZF9mAyJgNdKhmXr4Uob72lcmdnD4kbFyQe3RPrpFwFZn0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=AoDxpDNX2CCIR8VULq/BgDYhRXMyuxRqvD9zUmI9DMb79jQ1NalGJJ6Zo313F05yfBKm0uNhJGTDtE2A7OmPwnUvNfK4r6KgdGkWmbxlqgCgWrK6tUJgKKr1/HnUWcXjwHurNHXVd4PT1WDk+rOIW4i6YtjlMxxUe/eSYHTPeEA= Received: by 10.143.17.13 with SMTP id u13mr2778057wfi.69.1200792474149; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:27:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.104.18 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:27:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2b6bd2cc0801191727v6cfcd2c5scf5f7bb68abc0a89@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:27:54 -0300 From: "Celso Viana" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Failing to compile kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:55:16 -0000 Hi All, To compile the kernel of FreeBSD 7.0 RC1 and returned the error ... ===> zlib (all) cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -std=c99 -nostdinc -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DRUFF/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-common -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DRUFF -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -c /usr/src/sys/modules/zlib/../../net/zlib.c ld -d -warn-common -r -d -o zlib.kld zlib.o :> export_syms awk -f /usr/src/sys/modules/zlib/../../conf/kmod_syms.awk zlib.kld export_syms | xargs -J% objcopy % zlib.kld ld -Bshareable -d -warn-common -o zlib.ko zlib.kld objcopy --strip-debug zlib.ko ===> zyd (all) cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -std=c99 -nostdinc -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DRUFF/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-common -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DRUFF -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -c /usr/src/sys/modules/zyd/../../dev/usb/if_zyd.c ld -d -warn-common -r -d -o if_zyd.kld if_zyd.o :> export_syms awk -f /usr/src/sys/modules/zyd/../../conf/kmod_syms.awk if_zyd.kld export_syms | xargs -J% objcopy % if_zyd.kld ld -Bshareable -d -warn-common -o if_zyd.ko if_zyd.kld objcopy --strip-debug if_zyd.ko 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 ...What can be wrong? Thanks -- Celso Vianna BSD User: 51318 http://www.bsdcounter.org 63 8404-8559 Palmas/TO From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 01:55:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F07616A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:55:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from celso.vianna@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435F513C465 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:55:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from celso.vianna@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so2730921waf.3 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:55:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=6KrqbnBhqnfsL9uIIf9qwiyDR9Sld1uo0r723/O85Zk=; b=wYeD+txof6RNKUxgCOL6afiwYvegKNaOqjDnG5W6mMnuJWI6eBztrvvaTaZMV++sfvxn87BQsmivd3pMZSVKTzkFKcwXqhQLqF/w2Ui+2ounUVNHXTv3TvSvD9LM4ZslwhkkI4CuS5VyF5Oc1bYFEG7YDrs+kb2h7E0da1eWOCg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=TZ8wgboEacN1ei72Mo+rPQUjqS4W1SHfYi0ywAQhgvuclzkkdKA46QD2mAmNb7q2QUFvFN0mE81xDKzYOLhzrssZNBPtilxRbbN8RpqEy7oPPrED4ZPWUeFp4gMMdhNDLPedq7z/nC91We47FstiIG1e2KjmNMWpoY6p7vQEzT0= Received: by 10.142.163.14 with SMTP id l14mr994909wfe.230.1200792386399; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:26:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.104.18 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:26:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2b6bd2cc0801191726h245840a3gbf4b3c12194e75d0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:26:26 -0300 From: "Celso Viana" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 01:55:40 -0000 Hi All, To compile the kernel of FreeBSD 7.0 RC1 and returned the error ... ===> zlib (all) cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -std=c99 -nostdinc -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DRUFF/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-common -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DRUFF -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -c /usr/src/sys/modules/zlib/../../net/zlib.c ld -d -warn-common -r -d -o zlib.kld zlib.o :> export_syms awk -f /usr/src/sys/modules/zlib/../../conf/kmod_syms.awk zlib.kld export_syms | xargs -J% objcopy % zlib.kld ld -Bshareable -d -warn-common -o zlib.ko zlib.kld objcopy --strip-debug zlib.ko ===> zyd (all) cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -std=c99 -nostdinc -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DRUFF/opt_global.h -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param large-function-growth=1000 -fno-common -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DRUFF -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -mno-mmx -mno-3dnow -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 -ffreestanding -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -c /usr/src/sys/modules/zyd/../../dev/usb/if_zyd.c ld -d -warn-common -r -d -o if_zyd.kld if_zyd.o :> export_syms awk -f /usr/src/sys/modules/zyd/../../conf/kmod_syms.awk if_zyd.kld export_syms | xargs -J% objcopy % if_zyd.kld ld -Bshareable -d -warn-common -o if_zyd.ko if_zyd.kld objcopy --strip-debug if_zyd.ko 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 ...What can be wrong? Thanks -- Celso Vianna BSD User: 51318 http://www.bsdcounter.org 63 8404-8559 Palmas/TO From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 02:00:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC6D16A418 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:00:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=YZz788=SK=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailout16.yourhostingaccount.com (mailout16.yourhostingaccount.com [65.254.253.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE7613C442 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:00:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=YZz788=SK=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailscan14.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.15.14] helo=mailscan14.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailout16.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1JGPUP-0004oH-TJ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:00:50 -0500 Received: from impout02.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.55.2] helo=impout02.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailscan14.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1JGPUP-00007u-Io for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:00:49 -0500 Received: from authsmtp08.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.8]) by impout02.yourhostingaccount.com with NO UCE id fE0o1Y0020ASqTN0000000; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:00:48 -0500 X-EN-OrigOutIP: 10.1.18.8 X-EN-IMPSID: fE0o1Y0020ASqTN0000000 Received: from c-98-206-161-17.hsd1.il.comcast.net ([98.206.161.17] helo=vixen42) by authsmtp08.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtpa (Exim) id 1JGPUP-0004Ra-5b for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:00:49 -0500 Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:01:46 -0600 From: "Zane C.B." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080119200146.323a773c@vixen42> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EN-UserInfo: 0d1ca1697cdb7a831d4877828571b7ab:1570f0de6936c69fef9e164fffc541bc X-EN-AuthUser: vvelox2 Sender: "Zane C.B." X-EN-OrigIP: 98.206.161.17 X-EN-OrigHost: c-98-206-161-17.hsd1.il.comcast.net Subject: trying to locate a specific port that I forget the name of X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:00:51 -0000 I originally saw it in the ports tree, IIRC, about a year ago or around there. What it was was a massive piece of software for connecting multiple services allowing them all to be queried. It was capable of connecting to IMAP, LDAP, several SQL servers, and a few other things. The manual of the software was several hundred pages long. Any one remember what it is? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 02:28:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F40DC16A418 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:28:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E1313C455 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:28:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JGPuq-0001mj-P3 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:28:08 -0800 Message-ID: <14977783.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:28:08 -0800 (PST) From: s3raphi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: seraphi.lord@gmail.com Subject: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 syncache problems under high load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:28:10 -0000 I am running web polygraph against a FreeBSD7.0-RC1 squid server and experiencing problems. I have run the same test against the same hardware on FreeBSD 6.1 without issue. This seems to be specific to FreeBSD 7. The problem is related to the number of client connections: 250 Clients - runs great. 500 Clients- scores well in polygraph, but does have a few errored requests 750-2000 Clients - Error rate spikes way up and performance takes a nosedive. I turned on TCP debugging on the server and found lots of this: Jan 19 18:12:46 FlashCache kernel: TCP: [192.168.200.2]:60525 to [192.168.200.1]:8080 tcpflags 0x10; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) Jan 19 18:12:46 FlashCache kernel: TCP: [192.168.200.2]:50115 to [192.168.200.1]:8080 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK Jan 19 18:12:47 FlashCache kernel: TCP: [192.168.200.2]:50132 to [192.168.200.1]:8080; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (1) SYN|ACK Jan 19 18:12:48 FlashCache kernel: TCP: [192.168.200.2]:50132 to [192.168.200.1]:8080 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK Jan 19 18:12:48 FlashCache kernel: TCP: [192.168.200.2]:50138 to [192.168.200.1]:8080 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK Jan 19 18:12:48 FlashCache kernel: TCP: [192.168.200.2]:50144 to [192.168.200.1]:8080 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK Jan 19 18:12:49 FlashCache kernel: TCP: [192.168.200.2]:50169 to [192.168.200.1]:8080 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK Jan 19 18:12:49 FlashCache kernel: TCP: [192.168.200.2]:50170 to [192.168.200.1]:8080 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK Jan 19 18:12:52 FlashCache kernel: TCP: [192.168.200.2]:50203 to [192.168.200.1]:8080 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK Jan 19 18:12:52 FlashCache kernel: TCP: [192.168.200.2]:50167 to [192.168.200.1]:8080; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (1) SYN|ACK Jan 19 18:12:52 FlashCache kernel: TCP: [192.168.200.2]:50166 to [192.168.200.1]:8080; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (1) SYN|ACK This looks similar to something that has already been fixed in July. I am assuming that the July fix is included in RC1? http://www.nabble.com/FreeBSD-7-TCP-syncache-fix%3A-request-for-testers-to11515217.html#a11776616 I am using a generic kernel, and have this problem on both ethernet cards I have tested with(nfe and bge) These two machines were connected by a switch, but are now directly connected and have the same problem regardless. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FreeBSD-7.0-RC1-syncache-problems-under-high-load-tp14977783p14977783.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 02:28:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0BC16A46B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:28:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.kq6up.org (adsl-76-238-148-145.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [76.238.148.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB7713C467 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:28:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([192.168.1.2]) by ns1.kq6up.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0K2Slg4023419 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:28:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Message-ID: <4792B1DF.3030600@chrismaness.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:28:47 -0800 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Dump Command? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:28:50 -0000 Is it possible to dump a file system except for a specified directory? Or does the dump command require that the WHOLE file system is dumped? I remember gtar being able to negate archiving specific files. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 02:35:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6FF16A46D for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:35:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from authentec@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA0B13C4F6 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:35:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from authentec@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so392275anc.13 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:35:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JHGNvaZdFHqoLVQulk6zdcxTT03P58Fnfu0COf/NBMU=; b=LA6RHNJqRig7yCAnQBq+gVhpNjAB4r9ALaMlqfzgdNSlKh+I1I0+w0S5dlH4XqedRvJnlqNeNwdV6VQ3Ho+p8Ckb7u7W0piIdXq4xWB/zfTfzhl7IrbDUW8hju9eZu69oAvW+SGLhUJ4dh957RUqnGgaY5XGveJwAP6G3XKaPjk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SGPj3qfgvVFGT9IViw7GidE101wno+78DpZzBawFin1qr1aTzuQ6rOZ8JCHn14Z2ecLy97RcQaKngOAH2EiPFPH8nVqAdF8KGg8teb+MsFSBpPnICki2Q6a1/0pBRFt1LiAYKyk8dP12Un1Kt8lSGXbzaPvwTv495l5+0JYvhow= Received: by 10.100.249.9 with SMTP id w9mr11043824anh.105.1200796550516; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:35:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from Samson.home.net ( [69.177.150.191]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b11sm9540781ana.7.2008.01.19.18.35.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:35:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4792B383.6010406@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:35:47 -0500 From: Greg Mars User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080104) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: noc@hdk5.net References: <47928642.2090707@gmail.com> <4792A17E.9060208@hdk5.net> In-Reply-To: <4792A17E.9060208@hdk5.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Realtek 8111B LAN Chipset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:35:52 -0000 NetOpsCenter wrote: > Greg Mars wrote: >> I'm buying parts for a computer and want to make sure that the core >> components are as freebsd friendly as possible. So far, I've decided >> on a core 2 quad q6600 and I'm choosing the motherboard now. However >> it seems many of the popular motherboards have Realtek ALC888 as >> built-in audio and Realtek 8111B as built-in LAN. >> I read at: >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/CURRENT/hardware/i386/article.html >> >> that the sound should work but I couldn't find any info on the LAN. >> Does anyone on the list have any experience with it? >> >> By the way, I'm going to run FreeBSD 7. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > Aloha, > > Realtek 8169 is a 1000 M and works on 7.* and 8.* I think 8111 maybe > old 100M ? Are you sure about the Realtek model #? > > > ~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740 > + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org + noc@hdk5.net + > + http://aloha50.net - Supporting - FreeBSD 6.* - 7.* + > "All that's really worth doing is what we do for others."- Lewis Carrol > > > Hi, If you click on the motherboard specifications link below, you'll see where they list the LAN chipset as Realtek 8111B http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813186133 This seems to be the page for the chip on Realtek's site: http://www.realtek.com.tw/products/productsView.aspx?Langid=1&PFid=5&Level=5&Conn=4&ProdID=11 Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 02:43:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E44116A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:43:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54C713C4DD for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:43:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0K2gvxs031774; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:42:57 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m0K2guVq031771; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:42:57 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:42:56 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Chris Maness In-Reply-To: <4792B1DF.3030600@chrismaness.com> Message-ID: <20080119194048.O31755@wonkity.com> References: <4792B1DF.3030600@chrismaness.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:42:57 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dump Command? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 02:43:05 -0000 On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Chris Maness wrote: > Is it possible to dump a file system except for a specified directory? Or > does the dump command require that the WHOLE file system is dumped? I > remember gtar being able to negate archiving specific files. See the dump man page for the "nodump" flag, which can be set with chflags(1). -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 03:30:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348C116A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:30:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ws@au.dyndns.ws) Received: from ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B157A13C442 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:30:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ws@au.dyndns.ws) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAABxOkkeWZWdv/2dsb2JhbAAIrEI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,223,1199626200"; d="scan'208";a="38878615" Received: from ppp103-111.static.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.131]) ([150.101.103.111]) by ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 20 Jan 2008 14:00:04 +1030 From: Wayne Sierke To: Jonathan Chen In-Reply-To: <20080119110220.GA94573@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <47910EC7.1030507@nicoelro.net> <20080118225807.GA87703@osiris.chen.org.nz> <1200726377.4218.20.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> <20080119110220.GA94573@osiris.chen.org.nz> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:00:01 +1030 Message-Id: <1200799801.31778.14.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Eclipse and FreeBSD7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:30:06 -0000 On Sun, 2008-01-20 at 00:02 +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 05:36:17PM +1030, Wayne Sierke wrote: > > On Sat, 2008-01-19 at 11:58 +1300, Jonathan Chen wrote: > > > Eclipse will only work with the native-jdk. Use your installed > > > diablo-jdk to build the native-jdk, and then remove the diablo-jdk. > > > > Does that only apply for 7.0 and/or eclipse-3.2? I previously had > > eclipse-3.3 (eclipse-devel) running with diablo-jdk-1.5.0.07.01 on > > RELENG_6. > > According to the commit message on the eclipse port, this would apply > to FreeBSD 7.x and higher. > Missed it by *that* much. My ports tree was one day older than the commit. Thanks for the pointer. Wayne From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 03:31:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD8016A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:31:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob89@bobj.org) Received: from eastrmmtao107.cox.net (eastrmmtao107.cox.net [68.230.240.59]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C9113C465 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:31:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob89@bobj.org) Received: from eastrmimpo01.cox.net ([68.1.16.119]) by eastrmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080120033148.XTES8815.eastrmmtao107.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:31:48 -0500 Received: from mail.bobj.org ([70.185.102.217]) by eastrmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id fFWg1Y00L4hS3Ka0000000; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:30:41 -0500 Received: from bob.wb4jcm.org (bob.wb4jcm.org [192.168.132.33]) (AUTH: PLAIN bobj, ) by mail.bobj.org with esmtp; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:31:47 -0500 From: Bob Johnson To: Joerg Schilling Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:31:46 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <47927842.9laQQcD/42mYWXA0%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> In-Reply-To: <47927842.9laQQcD/42mYWXA0%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801192231.46700.bob89@bobj.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wrong times written by mkisofs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:31:50 -0000 On Saturday 19 January 2008 05:22:58 pm you wrote: > > Irecently built a CD of images to give to a friend. I noticed the > > timestamps displayed when I list the CD contents are five hours earlier > > than they should be. Five hours matches my GMT offset. This is a > > dual-boot system with Win XP, so the hardware clock is set to local time. > > > > E.g. a file on my hard drive has a correct timestamp > > -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 2246671 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0660_080115_2348.JPG > > > > while the same file on the resulting CD looks like > > -rw------- 1 bobo bobo 2246671 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0660_080115_2348.JPG > > > > The "date" command returns the correct local time. > > > > Did I do something incorrectly, or is this a bug in mkisofs? It appears > > to me that mkisofs decided to correct for GMT offset when it shouldn't > > have. > > > > Let me asume you use a _recent_ mkisofs and set up a correct timezone... > [...] > > What do you get from "mkisofs -version"? mkisofs 2.01 (i386-unknown-freebsd6.2) > What timezone do you have (how many hours from GMT and which location)? U.S. Eastern Standard Time (EST = GMT-5) > What do you have in the TZ= variable? It seems to be empty. > What do you see with "TZ=GMT ls -l ToJoe"? # TZ=GMT ls -l /mnt total 62113 -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 2246671 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0660_080115_2348.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3346787 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0661_080116_0524.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3623969 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0662_080116_0525.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3966310 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0663_080116_0526.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3971338 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0664_080116_0526.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3946837 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0665_080116_0528.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3873753 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0666_080116_0528.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3832501 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0667_080116_0529.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3854064 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0668_080116_0531.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3849156 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0669_080116_0532.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3868314 Jan 19 12:23 IMG_0670_080116_0533.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3901654 Jan 19 12:23 IMG_0671_080116_0534.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3851665 Jan 19 12:23 IMG_0672_080116_0537.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3850832 Jan 19 12:23 IMG_0673_080116_0538.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3876448 Jan 19 12:23 IMG_0674_080116_0542.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3866105 Jan 19 12:23 IMG_0675_080116_0543.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3881576 Jan 19 12:23 IMG_0676_080116_0543.JPG These times are the correct LOCAL time, not GMT. The following are five hours off: # TZ=EST ls -l /mnt total 62113 -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 2246671 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0660_080115_2348.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3346787 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0661_080116_0524.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3623969 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0662_080116_0525.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3966310 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0663_080116_0526.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3971338 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0664_080116_0526.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3946837 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0665_080116_0528.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3873753 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0666_080116_0528.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3832501 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0667_080116_0529.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3854064 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0668_080116_0531.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3849156 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0669_080116_0532.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3868314 Jan 19 07:23 IMG_0670_080116_0533.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3901654 Jan 19 07:23 IMG_0671_080116_0534.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3851665 Jan 19 07:23 IMG_0672_080116_0537.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3850832 Jan 19 07:23 IMG_0673_080116_0538.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3876448 Jan 19 07:23 IMG_0674_080116_0542.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3866105 Jan 19 07:23 IMG_0675_080116_0543.JPG -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3881576 Jan 19 07:23 IMG_0676_080116_0543.JPG I thought this system had been updated recently, but: # uname -a FreeBSD sniffles.bobj.org 6.2-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p4 #0: Thu Apr 26 17:40:53 UTC 2007 root@i386-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 so for my next trick, I will at least get it up to the lastest binary patch level, and try again. - Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 03:36:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1F116A41A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:36:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from omr13.networksolutionsemail.com (omr13.networksolutionsemail.com [205.178.146.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E781713C465 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:36:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from mail.networksolutionsemail.com (ns-omr13.mgt.hosting.dc2.netsol.com [10.49.6.76]) by omr13.networksolutionsemail.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with SMTP id m0K3a4eU004350 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:36:05 -0500 Received: (qmail 14332 invoked by uid 78); 20 Jan 2008 03:36:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO makeworld.com) (71.113.196.180) by ns-omr13.lb.hosting.dc2.netsol.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2008 03:36:04 -0000 Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:36:04 -0600 From: Chris To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20080119213604.08b35c61@makeworld.com> Organization: Makeworld.com X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.2.0 (GTK+ 2.12.3; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Now that 6.3 ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:36:06 -0000 Now that 6.3 is official, I have to assume that 7.0 is very near? -- Best regards, Chris "I teleported home one night With Ron and Sid and Meg. Ron stole Meggie's heart away And I got Sidney's leg." - A poem about matter transference beams. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 03:43:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C9C16A41A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:43:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43AE313C478 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:43:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from [172.16.156.151] (pool-71-182-130-170.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net [71.182.130.170]) (AUTH: LOGIN seklecki, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:43:24 -0500 id 00056419.4792C35C.0001813B From: "Brian A. Seklecki" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:43:18 -0500 Message-Id: <1200800599.3061.22.camel@new-host> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.2 (2.12.2-3.fc8) Subject: gmirror(8) on 6.3 mfsroot / fixit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:43:25 -0000 All: I see that gmirror(8) is available on the 6.3 fixit file system, but still not a part of the mfsroot. Is this a crunchgen problem? The install kernel has had boot/kernel/geom_mirror.ko since the 5x days. so it seems only appropriate to include the binary. I guess its a moot point since the fdisk / bsdlabel menus in sysinstall don't recognized probed geom volumes in /dev/mirror as candidate disks during installs or updates. Is there progress with this in RELENG_7 or trunk? Shall I file PR? ~BAS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 04:15:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2471F16A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:15:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D90413C43E for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:15:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0K4FUVQ072213; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:15:31 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.4.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk m0K4FUVQ072213 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dkim=hardfail (SSP) header.i=unknown Message-ID: <4792CAE2.7070805@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:15:30 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071122) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Whitehouse References: <47924869.2000909@onetel.com> <877ii5fsh0.fsf@chateau.d.lf> <47928A73.2040904@onetel.com> In-Reply-To: <47928A73.2040904@onetel.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:15:31 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/5499/Sun Jan 20 01:31:52 2008 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: localhost in sudoers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:15:41 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Chris Whitehouse wrote: > I'm not sure what you mean. This computer is on a local network behind a > nat box and doesn't have a dns entry. > > %host 192.168.1.71 > 71.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer eco.config. > %host localhost > localhost has address 127.0.0.1 > > I think my question really is why doesn't sudoers recognise localhost or > 127.0.0.1? Confusion between the IPv6ish ::1 rather than the IPv4ish 127.0.0.1 perhaps? You can just put the hostname of your machine in the sudoers file and sudo will query the IP addresses of its interfaces at runtime - -- or simply don't use the host based limiting stuff at all: that syntax is predicated on having the same sudoers file distributed over a number of machines, which is great for a large site with dozens of servers, but for a home user it's possibly easier to maintain an individual sudoers file on each machine you have. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHksri8Mjk52CukIwRCPfHAJ9m98pQb76ID8leqKRhyHKrzmJnFwCfaVXA n1hIg4OKpiursIKyu12ICE8= =jGzw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 04:18:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF4C16A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:18:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC90013C43E for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:18:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so1491193rvb.43 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:18:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=jtdnb5yHlftOj/VtZHd6fkEecMBrpW80BAp2Ykvp0bA=; b=DGVUYuyYuEZQgLFusdT8F1qqiWKSgXe9EQYX77YTXvDayP9eclO+4+faPIaKeCEUsY5tqPfPNboJBUReU519cDXmMQ8Ggj+nL9aPeFCcOsVKW1IrAsgT23vgQuIFFA3Y4ftHHM7NMVP9BOOxznDY/TmCjVMJoEFdmMvO7iwpWRk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NmyrOIT3eVQHusQBwUwf63qwgYWivAw0gsWbBZV1YMfGepnU0dxIBvWljxP6WQH6mvLbzJ02K2MzEwyzf+f8hX+U0GWvDoCfuKqsnqC9OLgQVSd6udhVQQlRuPYHvJSPdCQi2mNsGwg1wshrOKG6qi8HuNIzH0obv8dE2MY+NT4= Received: by 10.140.54.6 with SMTP id c6mr3576532rva.37.1200802734988; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:18:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.142.18 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:18:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54db43990801192018y1cdae24exf20ac2ad9c346e7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:18:54 -0500 From: "Bob Johnson" To: Chris In-Reply-To: <20080119213604.08b35c61@makeworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080119213604.08b35c61@makeworld.com> Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Now that 6.3 ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:18:58 -0000 On 1/19/08, Chris wrote: > Now that 6.3 is official, I have to assume that 7.0 is very near? > > -- > Best regards, > Chris I think 7.0 is very near, but not because of the status of 6.3. When a release is in the RC stage, it is very near full release unless something very significant is found by user testing. There are enough potential problems being posted that I wouldn't be surprised to see another release candidate, but perhaps all of those will turn out to be minor issues and the next thing that will happen is the full release. I have run 7.0 BETAs on several systems and encountered no problems (except that amd64 won't boot on our stupid HP systems with brain dead BIOSes, but i386 works fine on them, KDE and all). I have already put 7.0 on a couple of production DNS servers (well, they are intended for production, but are still in testing). The issues being reported don't seem to be a problem for that use, and I'd rather set up a new server with a new major release than one that is near end of life. - Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 04:19:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE28816A46B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:19:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B77013C45D for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:19:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so1491309rvb.43 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:19:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=7bySsEjx8eOQuQAfQ2/P6ZwvTr4iw5PGpRALf4620BM=; b=Lbwaoor4isW17E+h1lJZXwD79kgZaecaXis1A/s044WJoQnpw41p4qwqe/13zFL8ZkzP9HWR+pBJTPFwDkDQWxfVY3Qk8rpZGYMf8TD0SCNx6PszcHsvUA8kzTLRe5AHa7mwp9nob/uwSgQ2nHPpEt33HrUjGkjDTlQvClV7Bo4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=utxqB0zhYum894olUQKijwAsgbFyEQp/L9HwJ6c57/HGeZO7PkyB0AH/fk00qVLdtkLQ1pdlw5YjlGtmDpJUQEHci/qd9xOt/oKkOwJ2bJlSpykZ5T+Kn/2NSBx6+pojvFfYYJcr3qU+VwZ2C2aG5rG5az6J8C8iO4tbWBHT25Y= Received: by 10.140.147.18 with SMTP id u18mr3536077rvd.267.1200802784578; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:19:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.141.7 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:19:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:19:44 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Celso Viana" In-Reply-To: <2b6bd2cc0801191727v6cfcd2c5scf5f7bb68abc0a89@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2b6bd2cc0801191727v6cfcd2c5scf5f7bb68abc0a89@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Failing to compile kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:19:45 -0000 On 19/01/2008, Celso Viana wrote: . . . > 1 error > *** Error code 2 > 1 error > *** Error code 2 > > ...What can be wrong? Did you compile with -j ? -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 04:22:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AA616A421 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:22:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j_guojun@lbl.gov) Received: from smtp122.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp122.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.64.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C291E13C45B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:22:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j_guojun@lbl.gov) Received: (qmail 84356 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2008 03:55:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.15?) (jinmtb@sbcglobal.net@76.199.107.118 with plain) by smtp122.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2008 03:55:34 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: ZRmsaMYVM1ljfPczaQkqIO3E6H9nS8sL_Spvg0Dco5KGH0pHjrB5LNSMWfddrJrCYQsX_0wdMEneZLbOKw.Vpi_9 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4792C632.5010502@lbl.gov> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 19:55:30 -0800 From: "Jim Guojun [VFFS]" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061027 X-Accept-Language: en, zh, zh-CN MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000507040202090907020800" Cc: Subject: X -configure fails on 6.3-Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:22:16 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000507040202090907020800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit After installed FreeBSD 6.3 on two machines, and X server cannot be started somehow on either one. Both "X -configure" and "X -probeonly" failed and errors are in attached file -- Xerr. Also, Xorg.o.log is attached. Both machines run FreeBSD 6.2 and X works fine. I search wiki.x.org and freebsd list, but did not see any information related to this problem. Can someone tell me what is going wrong on my installation or X configuration? Thanks, -Jin --------------000507040202090907020800 Content-Type: text/plain; name="Xerr" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="Xerr" X.Org X Server 1.4.0 Release Date: 5 September 2007 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE i386 Current Operating System: FreeBSD mobile.Belkin 6.3-RC2 FreeBSD 6.3-RC2 #0: Sat Jan 12 13:41:51 PST 2008 root@mobile.Belkin:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MinMax i386 Build Date: 01 December 2007 09:49:15PM Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sat Jan 19 19:24:50 2008 (EE) Unable to locate/open config file New driver is "ati" (==) Using default built-in configuration (55 lines) (EE) Failed to load module "ati" (module does not exist, 0) (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0) (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0) (EE) Failed to load module "vga" (module does not exist, 0) (EE) Failed to load module "mouse" (module does not exist, 0) (EE) Failed to load module "kbd" (module does not exist, 0) (EE) No drivers available. Fatal server error: no screens found X.Org X Server 1.4.0 Release Date: 5 September 2007 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE i386 Current Operating System: FreeBSD mobile.Belkin 6.3-RC2 FreeBSD 6.3-RC2 #0: Sat Jan 12 13:41:51 PST 2008 root@mobile.Belkin:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MinMax i386 Build Date: 01 December 2007 09:49:15PM Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sat Jan 19 19:24:59 2008 Missing output drivers. Configuration failed. --------------000507040202090907020800 Content-Type: text/plain; name="Xorg.0.log" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="Xorg.0.log" X.Org X Server 1.4.0 Release Date: 5 September 2007 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE i386 Current Operating System: FreeBSD mobile.Belkin 6.3-RC2 FreeBSD 6.3-RC2 #0: Sat Jan 12 13:41:51 PST 2008 root@mobile.Belkin:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MinMax i386 Build Date: 01 December 2007 09:49:15PM Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Module Loader present Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sat Jan 19 19:24:59 2008 (II) Loader magic: 0x81af380 (II) Module ABI versions: X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.3 X.Org Video Driver: 2.0 X.Org XInput driver : 2.0 X.Org Server Extension : 0.3 X.Org Font Renderer : 0.5 (II) Loader running on freebsd (II) LoadModule: "pcidata" (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules//libpcidata.so (II) Module pcidata: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 1.4.0, module version = 1.0.0 ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 2.0 (--) Using syscons driver with X support (version 2.0) (--) using VT number 9 (II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1 (II) PCI: Config type is 1 (II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x8000a108, mode1Res1 = 0x80000000 (WW) OS did not count PCI devices, guessing wildly (II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex) (II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 1002,5950 card 103c,30ae rev 01 class 06,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:01:0: chip 1002,5a3f card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,04,00 hdr 01 (II) PCI: 00:05:0: chip 1002,5a37 card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,04,00 hdr 01 (II) PCI: 00:13:0: chip 1002,4374 card 1002,4374 rev 00 class 0c,03,10 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:13:1: chip 1002,4375 card 1002,4375 rev 00 class 0c,03,10 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:13:2: chip 1002,4373 card 1002,4373 rev 00 class 0c,03,20 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:14:0: chip 1002,4372 card 103c,30ae rev 11 class 0c,05,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:14:1: chip 1002,4376 card 103c,30ae rev 00 class 01,01,8a hdr 00 (II) PCI: 00:14:3: chip 1002,4377 card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,01,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:14:4: chip 1002,4371 card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,04,01 hdr 81 (II) PCI: 00:14:5: chip 1002,4370 card 103c,30ae rev 02 class 04,01,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:14:6: chip 1002,4378 card 103c,30ae rev 02 class 07,03,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:18:0: chip 1022,1100 card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:18:1: chip 1022,1101 card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:18:2: chip 1022,1102 card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 00:18:3: chip 1022,1103 card 0000,0000 rev 00 class 06,00,00 hdr 80 (II) PCI: 01:05:0: chip 1002,5955 card 103c,30ae rev 00 class 03,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 06:02:0: chip 14e4,4318 card 103c,1355 rev 02 class 02,80,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: 06:06:0: chip 10ec,8139 card 103c,30a4 rev 10 class 02,00,00 hdr 00 (II) PCI: End of PCI scan (II) Host-to-PCI bridge: (II) Bus 0: bridge is at (0:0:0), (0,0,6), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_EN is set) (II) Bus 0 I/O range: [0] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0000ffff (0x10000) IX[B] (II) Bus 0 non-prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x0) MX[B] (II) Bus 0 prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x0) MX[B] (II) PCI-to-PCI bridge: (II) Bus 1: bridge is at (0:1:0), (0,1,1), BCTRL: 0x000c (VGA_EN is set) (II) Bus 1 I/O range: [0] -1 0 0x00009000 - 0x000090ff (0x100) IX[B] [1] -1 0 0x00009400 - 0x000094ff (0x100) IX[B] [2] -1 0 0x00009800 - 0x000098ff (0x100) IX[B] [3] -1 0 0x00009c00 - 0x00009cff (0x100) IX[B] (II) Bus 1 non-prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0xc0100000 - 0xc01fffff (0x100000) MX[B] (II) Bus 1 prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0xc8000000 - 0xcfffffff (0x8000000) MX[B] (II) PCI-to-PCI bridge: (II) Bus 2: bridge is at (0:5:0), (0,2,3), BCTRL: 0x0000 (VGA_EN is cleared) (II) PCI-to-ISA bridge: (II) Bus -1: bridge is at (0:20:3), (0,-1,-1), BCTRL: 0x0008 (VGA_EN is set) (II) Subtractive PCI-to-PCI bridge: (II) Bus 6: bridge is at (0:20:4), (0,6,7), BCTRL: 0x0002 (VGA_EN is cleared) (II) Bus 6 I/O range: [0] -1 0 0x0000a000 - 0x0000afff (0x1000) IX[B] (II) Bus 6 non-prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0xc0200000 - 0xc02fffff (0x100000) MX[B] (--) PCI:*(1:5:0) ATI Technologies Inc Radeon XPRESS 200M 5955 (PCIE) rev 0, Mem @ 0xc8000000/27, 0xc0100000/16, I/O @ 0x9000/8 Missing output drivers. Configuration failed. --------------000507040202090907020800-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 04:33:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B74816A418 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:33:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7724F13C442 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:33:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0K4XYns072483; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:33:35 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.4.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk m0K4XYns072483 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dkim=hardfail (SSP) header.i=unknown Message-ID: <4792CF1E.9090806@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:33:34 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071122) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Zane C.B." References: <20080119200146.323a773c@vixen42> In-Reply-To: <20080119200146.323a773c@vixen42> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:33:35 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/5499/Sun Jan 20 01:31:52 2008 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: trying to locate a specific port that I forget the name of X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:33:42 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Zane C.B. wrote: > I originally saw it in the ports tree, IIRC, about a year ago or > around there. > > What it was was a massive piece of software for connecting multiple > services allowing them all to be queried. It was capable of > connecting to IMAP, LDAP, several SQL servers, and a few other > things. The manual of the software was several hundred pages long. > > Any one remember what it is? perl ? Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHks8e8Mjk52CukIwRCG6xAJ9hsNk65vvWDAW53zD/sXRDgQMougCePaUs YIo7gWMqS3r0VxcF/JPvApg= =6Nu8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 05:10:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A0516A420 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from nyi.unixathome.org (nyi.unixathome.org [64.147.113.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DCE13C455 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:10:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@nyi.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1EB5098E for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:10:03 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at unixathome.org Received: from nyi.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nyi.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ELlJZNJi8tgV for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:10:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C237B508E2; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:10:01 +0000 (GMT) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20080120051001.C237B508E2@nyi.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:10:01 +0000 (GMT) Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2007-12-30 - 2008-01-19 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:10:06 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 05:12:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8E816A46B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:12:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu (math051.cs.arizona.edu [150.135.82.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15DD313C45B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:12:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from Debian-exim by smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JGSUJ-0004b8-Vp for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:12:57 -0700 Received: from 71-220-164-236.tcsn.qwest.net ([71.220.164.236] helo=[192.168.2.101]) by smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JGSUG-0004ah-Ha; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:12:52 -0700 Message-ID: <4792D7A1.6020903@math.arizona.edu> Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:09:53 -0700 From: Predrag Punosevac User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jim Guojun [VFFS]" References: <4792C632.5010502@lbl.gov> In-Reply-To: <4792C632.5010502@lbl.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Outgoing-Spam-Score: -3.7 (---) Cc: questions@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X -configure fails on 6.3-Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:12:58 -0000 Jim Guojun [VFFS] wrote: > After installed FreeBSD 6.3 on two machines, and X server cannot be > started somehow on either one. > > Both "X -configure" and "X -probeonly" failed and errors are in > attached file -- Xerr. > Also, Xorg.o.log is attached. > (EE) Failed to load module "ati" (module does not exist, 0) (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0) (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0) (EE) Failed to load module "vga" (module does not exist, 0) (EE) Failed to load module "mouse" (module does not exist, 0) (EE) Failed to load module "kbd" (module does not exist, 0) (EE) No drivers available. How did you add Xorg? It looks like you are completely missing drivers. Did you reboot the computers after the XOrg was added. Look also Xorg.0.log file (II) Bus 6 non-prefetchable memory range: [0] -1 0 0xc0200000 - 0xc02fffff (0x100000) MX[B] (--) PCI:*(1:5:0) ATI Technologies Inc Radeon XPRESS 200M 5955 (PCIE) rev 0, Mem @ 0xc8000000/27, 0xc0100000/16, I/O @ 0x9000/8 Missing output drivers. Configuration failed. It is complaining that the drivers are missing. Try fresh installation and try to do installation without X and then add Xorg as pkg_add -r . Reboot and then try Xorg -configure to create the initial xorg.conf.new file Then probe with X -config /root/xorg.conf.new (use complete path even if you are in root directory) Then if the server gets fired cp /root/xorg.conf.new /etc/X11/xorg.conf As far as I see you are just missing drivers there are no other problems like the one with resolution or default depth Good Luck OKO > Both machines run FreeBSD 6.2 and X works fine. > I search wiki.x.org and freebsd list, but did not see any information > related to this problem. > > Can someone tell me what is going wrong on my installation or X > configuration? > > Thanks, > -Jin > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 05:15:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D674E16A469 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:15:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) Received: from mail.asahi-net.or.jp (mail1.asahi-net.or.jp [202.224.39.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED2713C4E5 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:15:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) Received: from asahi-net.jp (i222141.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [61.125.222.141]) by mail.asahi-net.or.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4914F36FC8; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:15:17 +0900 (JST) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:15:17 +0900 From: WATANABE Kazuhiro To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/20.7 (i386--freebsd) MULE/4.1 (AOI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20080120051517.4914F36FC8@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> Cc: Subject: Re: Trying to setup a serial console on my desktop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 05:15:18 -0000 Hello. At Sat, 19 Jan 2008 02:17:42 +0530, ???? ????? Ashish Shukla wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to setup serial console on my FreeBSD 7.0-BETA4, I'm facing > some issues. > > ----8<----8<---- > [abbe@chateau ~]$ cat /boot.config > -DP > [abbe@chateau ~]$ cat /boot/loader.conf > sound_load="YES" # Digital sound subsystem > snd_hda_load="YES" # Intel High Definition Audio (Controller) > snd_ds1_load="YES" # ds1 > comconsole_speed="115200" > boot_multicons="YES" > boot_serial="YES" > console="comconsole,vidconsole" # A comma separated list of console(s) > [abbe@chateau ~]$ cat /etc/ttys |grep -v ^# |fgrep -v none > ttyv0 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25 on secure > ttyv1 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25 on secure > ttyv2 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25 on secure > ttyv3 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25 on secure > ttyv4 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25 on secure > ttyv5 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25 on secure > ttyv6 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25 on secure > ttyv7 "/usr/libexec/getty Pc" cons25 on secure > ttyv8 "/usr/local/bin/xdm -nodaemon" xterm off secure > ttyd0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.115200" vt220 on secure > ttyd1 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup off secure > ttyd2 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup off secure > ttyd3 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup off secure > dcons "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt100 off secure > [abbe@chateau ~]$ stty -a -f /dev/ttyd0 > speed 115200 baud; 0 rows; 0 columns; > lflags: icanon isig iexten echo echoe -echok echoke -echonl echoctl > -echoprt -altwerase -noflsh -tostop -flusho pendin -nokerninfo > -extproc > iflags: -istrip icrnl -inlcr -igncr ixon -ixoff ixany imaxbel -ignbrk > brkint -inpck -ignpar -parmrk > oflags: opost onlcr -ocrnl oxtabs -onocr -onlret > cflags: cread cs8 -parenb -parodd hupcl clocal -cstopb crtscts -dsrflow > -dtrflow -mdmbuf > cchars: discard = ^O; dsusp = ^Y; eof = ^D; eol = ; > eol2 = ; erase = ^?; erase2 = ^H; intr = ^C; kill = ^U; > lnext = ^V; min = 1; quit = ^\; reprint = ^R; start = ^Q; > status = ^T; stop = ^S; susp = ^Z; time = 0; werase = ^W; > ----8<----8<---- > > I've a desktop mobo (Intel D945GNTL) with onboard Intel Graphics. My > BIOS doesn't support redirecting its output to COM1. > > Following are the issues: > > 1. comconsole_speed in /boot/loader.conf is not working. I wanted to > try 115200 baud rate, but its not working when set in loader.conf. If > I set comconsole_speed at > loader prompt, it works. loader.conf(5) says: | comconsole_speed | (``9600'' or the value of the BOOT_COMCONSOLE_SPEED vari- | able when loader(8) was compiled). Sets the speed of the | serial console. If the previous boot loader stage speci- | fied that a serial console is in use then the default | speed is determined from the current serial port speed | setting. If you specify to use a serial console via /boot.config and want to change the speed from 9600bps (default), you need to add the "-S speed" flag to your /boot.config. See boot(8) for details. > 2. Keyboard doesn't work irrespective of '-P' being present in > /boot.config . So I can't login to any TTY or login to X via GDM. > > I'm following http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialconsole-setup.html Is a login prompt displayd to the video console? If not, the system boot sequence may have been stopped at some kinds of daemon (sshd, sendmail, etc.). --- WATANABE Kazuhiro (CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 06:37:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B70916A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:37:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gs_stoller@juno.com) Received: from outbound-mail.dca.untd.com (outbound-mail.dca.untd.com [64.136.47.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E0C713C458 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:37:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gs_stoller@juno.com) Received: from webmail08.dca.untd.com (webmail08.dca.untd.com [10.171.12.148]) by smtpout01.dca.untd.com with SMTP id AABD3F5BQAJM38KA for (sender ); Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:37:34 -0800 (PST) X-UNTD-OriginStamp: /s5f1SIGSI3+WdnoYQ8yRMKZz72OrIqgNgUOv1py7suuk0uV8R2Q/w== Received: (from gs_stoller@juno.com) by webmail08.dca.untd.com (jqueuemail) id M9VMN8AE; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 22:36:51 PST Received: from [71.190.134.167] by webmail08.dca.untd.com with HTTP: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:36:36 GMT X-Originating-IP: [71.190.134.167] Mime-Version: 1.0 From: "gs_stoller@juno.com" Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:36:36 GMT To: aryeh.friedman@gmail.com X-Mailer: Webmail Version 4.0 Message-Id: <20080120.013636.5220.0@webmail08.dca.untd.com> X-UOL-TAGLINE: true X-ContentStamp: 1:1:3690232844 X-MAIL-INFO: 33359465b41df4b4d1f41df489dd2949e100f9e0f9e5c9b131c9b0f1f1243139513565a474c994b49d40311da1a1bd05601d94b58d70b441d4c4ed41c4302925c47d5d5df9605db5c114e18580018440d4b5a951d0fd14807565c92dd024fd9465942184e98164ad351000e4 X-UNTD-Peer-Info: 10.171.12.148|webmail08.dca.untd.com|webmail08.dca.untd.com|gs_stoller@juno.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: sector editor X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:37:42 -0000 In an email to mahdieh Saeed (Message-ID: <4789BD17.2020604@gmail.com> just in case this helps) you mentioned a "raw sector editor" .I would like to get a raw sector editor= (both source and compiled forms, as I don't have a reliable compiler) together= with instructions for its use, hopefully one callable from a shell script. I= would als like information about sector structures, e.g. plaiin sectore and direc= tory sectore. Also, someplace (on the disk there is a pointer to the head (or base, de= pending on how you look at it) of the file system. Where is this? How do slice= s and (UNIX) partitions fit in? (I do know some of this information, but I wo= uld like to get a complete description.) _____________________________________________________________ Click to recieve credit card help and get out of debt fast. http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2121/fc/Ioyw6i3m2DUmouazn9s7hnfRmeRP= oXywl2B8BjdZkde2EthZwS9FT4/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 07:10:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40AB16A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wahjava@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 835C313C442 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wahjava@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so2880986waf.3 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:10:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:to:cc:subject:x-face:references:x-pgp-fp:x-pgp:x-mailer:x-attribution:pgp:organization:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:face:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=qiE35zlmhrHkWFrFZb92ImjTRl2TMiaIA6+Yb8sWscQ=; b=W7vGB3eXkP7Uh557jr2vlEiHSrVb24P/lsV8x5m017h5DEBWhU53l01VAXVGEdMDc13tU4NJIhXjn6CFOWFUypBeCNNgk5Ch1NC0PTsI5vNg6gZhx7H4Cin8eDdQxk4c8Nh2EtBsFKp5X7PnhuxF8VBl8w2+G2qaf5he7bkEy9Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=to:cc:subject:x-face:references:x-pgp-fp:x-pgp:x-mailer:x-attribution:pgp:organization:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:face:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=QhcpAWnnwikCGnuzKw8OWBVCyQfdkHfywhaRMnnYPnebU/aC8kLUoEbdqSwErTqMMUdBGKGtitcwchD5P95mVken533372xhjG7jv3U6uLXHDjhV4Kb3LtR4tdJC50AZxe7dj1Zc7GLDQbRi0FeA5zYQmrFTEyNcauOBnVCyIZM= Received: by 10.114.194.1 with SMTP id r1mr3473158waf.40.1200813029487; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:10:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from chateau.d.lf ( [122.162.250.141]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k24sm12033338waf.22.2008.01.19.23.10.27 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:10:29 -0800 (PST) To: Chris Whitehouse X-Face: "\:nMpJ)EA!j>2nEu-[(+&o:N+CtL^AS\, Jv*LO5qBr#W2.\=d <877ii5fsh0.fsf@chateau.d.lf> <47928A73.2040904@onetel.com> X-PGP-FP: 1E00 4679 77E4 F8EE 2E4B 56F2 1F2F 8410 762E 5E74 X-PGP: 762E5E74 X-Mailer: Gnus/5.11 (Oort 5.11) Emacs/22.1.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Attribution: =?utf-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3?= PGP: 762E5E74 Organization: /\/0/\/3 From: wahjava.ml@gmail.com (Ashish Shukla =?utf-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3IA==?= =?utf-8?B?4KS24KWB4KSV4KWN4KSy?=) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:40:37 +0530 In-Reply-To: <47928A73.2040904@onetel.com> (Chris Whitehouse's message of "Sat\, 19 Jan 2008 23\:40\:35 +0000") Message-ID: <87tzl97z0y.fsf@chateau.d.lf> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEVfX1/8/PwTExMDAwO0 tLSampr////f398oKCi/v78MDAwICAihq32EAAACU0lEQVQ4jW3UvWvbQBQA8LOJsJIsOajtZAtH Aqq8FLQUvNjhCex2UYpE7XYytPJalxJnFMImqrOkIJfcZtwGgrqEhELQ/XN9p+jLbc+Drfvx7r17 9jNxszXCV2mR9P3ACoKAOM5bugn1hRBRFAnxeErLMN4RIpbwYKwmZfgkMGDNol8PhlFrFDDalQcx BMMwXpwV8KElYqYzpmOA0a4UsC/EmrEU4ptGDq9kghTabP09g9EuFiSpJQOYXslgrEd6Aj8Q7pl+ kcFH3NRlUTIFfvyZwV4sEzwV20a4y2A/BWEYLxdYwk0Gn+Mohfa2X4bXsn8StC0uYdVI4T02cK0F is15ArcZYKeER5Q+f4JofZZHiPshJPt8BwtPrp4kF+KOp+sdpjvOjqpf3n+1bD6dTjk3ySKuZVU1 ezcdpm3h/pL4h9eP3Rw6R5bqa9t86a/1W3OVd7dpzgBMx8YAxVFgvgmqDTwEdQignOVgI1ggoQMA x40CFHzmCHgXcEoAig39MOSATTGt5znQL4qDIRIgNK2LAqYWAl47lBGDSgHNjoOt6vdDkNAtQc9E wN0EJgXQN7aMSABIGU7mMiI5CtQJzX9w9PwQYOApVqBwCMqwp9lmkKzh0qM5uPTAn/Vw0ogazK9m JRjR6pHqEVyqd1XbgPPfKkgAddClxRi49NmKcNMh+JV4T7mzqW1e2jwk3pAPjugGuCfHPLRIP/Qr tLEB9daW7HrvcLIx55i/9zjkfMlO//pnwLHyPcupzrL9AtxrFgTaN/dfGFcjreb+B9wmnzaKpz8p dKsBFjzeRQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: =?UTF-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3IOCktuClgeCkleCljeCksg==?= Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: localhost in sudoers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:10:30 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:40:35 +0000, Chris Whitehouse said: Chris> I think my question really is why doesn't sudoers recognise loca= lhost Chris> or 127.0.0.1? Quoting from sudo.c of sudo-1.6.8p12 in "init_vars(int)" routine: =2D---8<----8<---- /* * We avoid gethostbyname() if possible since we don't want * sudo to block if DNS or NIS is hosed. * "host" is the (possibly fully-qualified) hostname and * "shost" is the unqualified form of the hostname. */ sudo_user.host_fqdn_queried =3D FALSE; nohostname =3D gethostname(thost, sizeof(thost)); if (nohostname) user_host =3D user_shost =3D "localhost"; else { user_host =3D estrdup(thost); if ((p =3D strchr(user_host, '.'))) { *p =3D '\0'; user_shost =3D estrdup(user_host); *p =3D '.'; } else { user_shost =3D user_host; } } =2D--->8---->8---- As you can see, it uses gethostname() to return the hostname. So, your host won't be 'localhost' unless its not able to retrieve hostname or your hostname is set to 'localhost'. Why they did this probably because any entry for 'localhost' is valid for execution on all machines, ;) . HTH =2D-=20 Ashish Shukla =E0=A4=86=E0=A4=B6=E0=A5=80=E0=A4=B7 =E0=A4=B6=E0=A5=81=E0=A4= =95=E0=A5=8D=E0=A4=B2 http://wahjava.wordpress.com/ =C2=B7-- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7=C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7--- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7=C2= =B7- =C2=B7- =C2=B7--=C2=B7-=C2=B7 --=C2=B7 -- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7-= =C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7-=C2=B7-=C2=B7- -=C2=B7-=C2=B7 --- -- --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHkvPwHy+EEHYuXnQRArUtAJ0df4aWOz61pDFGfUd5LcMvEkLE5ACfU/Nb yV41/9pd5LrIbbPSsW+YWBQ= =Uf+l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 07:31:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4939A16A419 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:31:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wahjava@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90CC13C4E1 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:31:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wahjava@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so1520939rvb.43 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:31:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:to:cc:subject:x-face:references:x-pgp-fp:x-pgp:x-mailer:x-attribution:pgp:organization:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:face:mime-version:content-type; bh=ddJN1AqzvZcXTLQ2GvPtX3B59Pv4CXfukEa3Y9C/hFk=; b=PjVYYZ9+8hDMPKiUkS91CpeS8XDUM0xOm6e/MAl5CQTgQWBhMg+k8BO7nJ3S6zmweAvaXncq1Cyn21Diq7Mf2YWdyaMcXIxxOZkrxTgB7sUacaSQV3xEJHxIa1DlecSifCNyQhismo0PDoTRAhDxmKJxOxD2bZs4a5uYRmatYFo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=to:cc:subject:x-face:references:x-pgp-fp:x-pgp:x-mailer:x-attribution:pgp:organization:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:face:mime-version:content-type; b=XyMjIzNgECDrQZtZD0T0RwHftTs2L5H0X1he7PK6sJvb85cWQGQMSPLzkNed9IkFkFcvRYL9feGVhiXTHadWH2mxf5OgbxWuy1gOlrt4JWa8AVAEkTiaMw6Xv3CkrLnlZNeXGHURVJT+RIKP3Zrn3dPbLOlt4wHwkj/D+ROD64Y= Received: by 10.140.199.19 with SMTP id w19mr3618704rvf.90.1200814264663; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:31:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from chateau.d.lf ( [122.162.250.141]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k19sm6495438rvb.18.2008.01.19.23.31.01 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:31:04 -0800 (PST) To: WATANABE Kazuhiro X-Face: "\:nMpJ)EA!j>2nEu-[(+&o:N+CtL^AS\, Jv*LO5qBr#W2.\=d <20080120051517.4914F36FC8@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> X-PGP-FP: 1E00 4679 77E4 F8EE 2E4B 56F2 1F2F 8410 762E 5E74 X-PGP: 762E5E74 X-Mailer: Gnus/5.11 (Oort 5.11) Emacs/22.1.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Attribution: =?utf-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3?= PGP: 762E5E74 Organization: /\/0/\/3 From: wahjava@gmail.com (Ashish Shukla =?utf-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3IOCktg==?= =?utf-8?B?4KWB4KSV4KWN4KSy?=) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:01:15 +0530 In-Reply-To: <20080120051517.4914F36FC8@mail.asahi-net.or.jp> (WATANABE Kazuhiro's message of "Sun\, 20 Jan 2008 14\:15\:17 +0900") Message-ID: <87prvx7y2k.fsf@chateau.d.lf> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEVfX1/8/PwTExMDAwO0 tLSampr////f398oKCi/v78MDAwICAihq32EAAACU0lEQVQ4jW3UvWvbQBQA8LOJsJIsOajtZAtH Aqq8FLQUvNjhCex2UYpE7XYytPJalxJnFMImqrOkIJfcZtwGgrqEhELQ/XN9p+jLbc+Drfvx7r17 9jNxszXCV2mR9P3ACoKAOM5bugn1hRBRFAnxeErLMN4RIpbwYKwmZfgkMGDNol8PhlFrFDDalQcx BMMwXpwV8KElYqYzpmOA0a4UsC/EmrEU4ptGDq9kghTabP09g9EuFiSpJQOYXslgrEd6Aj8Q7pl+ kcFH3NRlUTIFfvyZwV4sEzwV20a4y2A/BWEYLxdYwk0Gn+Mohfa2X4bXsn8StC0uYdVI4T02cK0F is15ArcZYKeER5Q+f4JofZZHiPshJPt8BwtPrp4kF+KOp+sdpjvOjqpf3n+1bD6dTjk3ySKuZVU1 ezcdpm3h/pL4h9eP3Rw6R5bqa9t86a/1W3OVd7dpzgBMx8YAxVFgvgmqDTwEdQignOVgI1ggoQMA x40CFHzmCHgXcEoAig39MOSATTGt5znQL4qDIRIgNK2LAqYWAl47lBGDSgHNjoOt6vdDkNAtQc9E wN0EJgXQN7aMSABIGU7mMiI5CtQJzX9w9PwQYOApVqBwCMqwp9lmkKzh0qM5uPTAn/Vw0ogazK9m JRjR6pHqEVyqd1XbgPPfKkgAddClxRi49NmKcNMh+JV4T7mzqW1e2jwk3pAPjugGuCfHPLRIP/Qr tLEB9daW7HrvcLIx55i/9zjkfMlO//pnwLHyPcupzrL9AtxrFgTaN/dfGFcjreb+B9wmnzaKpz8p dKsBFjzeRQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Trying to setup a serial console on my desktop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:31:06 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> WATANABE Kazuhiro writes: WATANABE> Hello. [...] WATANABE> loader.conf(5) says: WATANABE> | comconsole_speed WATANABE> | (``9600'' or the value of the BOOT_COMCONSOLE_SPE= ED vari- WATANABE> | able when loader(8) was compiled). Sets the spee= d of the WATANABE> | serial console. If the previous boot loader stag= e speci- WATANABE> | fied that a serial console is in use then the def= ault WATANABE> | speed is determined from the current serial port = speed WATANABE> | setting. WATANABE> If you specify to use a serial console via /boot.config and WATANABE> want to change the speed from 9600bps (default), you need to = add WATANABE> the "-S speed" flag to your /boot.config. See boot(8) for de= tails. By me specificying use of serial console via /boot.config, you mean '-D' option, which I specified in /boot.config, hmm...? If yes, then this means it'll override 'console' setting I specified in "loader.conf", hmm...? e.g. if I specified 'console=3Dvidconsole' in 'loader.conf', but has '-D' in /boot.config, will I get output on both serial and internal console, hmm...? And BtW, if I specify anything at loader prompt, e.g. "set comconsole_speed=3D115200", it works, i.e. I can connect to serial console at 115200 bps. So won't values specified at loader prompt have same priority as values specified in "loader.conf", hmm... ? Sorry I'm bit confused regarding which gets priority, 'loader.conf' or 'boot.config'. >> 2. Keyboard doesn't work irrespective of '-P' being present in >> /boot.config . So I can't login to any TTY or login to X via GDM. >>=20 >> I'm following http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handb= ook/serialconsole-setup.html WATANABE> Is a login prompt displayd to the video console? I asked GDM service to start at startup. So I get a GDM GUI, but I can't use my keyboard to enter my username there, not I'll be able to switch TTYs, though mouse is working fine. WATANABE> If not, the system boot sequence may have been stopped at som= e kinds WATANABE> of daemon (sshd, sendmail, etc.). I've all my hostname, and DNS stuff set up correctly, so there isn't problem of any kind, as I see messages of sendmail, sshd starting on my serial console at 9600bps. BtW, only 'dmesg' message appears on my video console, whereas all kind of messages appear on serial console, do I need some changes in syslog too to get all messages also on my video console, hmm...? WATANABE> --- WATANABE> WATANABE Kazuhiro (CQG00620@nifty.ne.jp) TIA =2D-=20 Ashish Shukla =E0=A4=86=E0=A4=B6=E0=A5=80=E0=A4=B7 =E0=A4=B6=E0=A5=81=E0=A4= =95=E0=A5=8D=E0=A4=B2 http://wahjava.wordpress.com/ =C2=B7-- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7=C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7--- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7=C2= =B7- =C2=B7- =C2=B7--=C2=B7-=C2=B7 --=C2=B7 -- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7-= =C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7-=C2=B7-=C2=B7- -=C2=B7-=C2=B7 --- -- --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHkvjDHy+EEHYuXnQRArXoAKDEsCkH5hqj59wAt0gbq+qHPH94mACguMGX yczELY9ykR9tMtFEO8YxKTk= =6tMD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 07:34:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A0516A418 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:34:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wahjava@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D9313C45A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wahjava@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so1521347rvb.43 for ; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:34:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:to:cc:subject:x-face:references:x-pgp-fp:x-pgp:x-mailer:x-attribution:pgp:organization:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:face:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=RfYReK6ouQCLTrmz0eCqieB6kaCrwCB9US5D6C8VpWI=; b=FJVSMKYTTyegXYWrphwanP083gYcs5uc0oR+hIiUpB2dmfFzHBYokbz/Z+2KAmo/hiBFaGu7xKhwdsVOg5Lj6V86cnH04ah5Qv+G9QLOlV9iqNYe5sM3Tsox7T8KikZErcDXfTmU4uNWUKsaQz1EOiBMPh9w/T8e2CgRYxv1qkM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=to:cc:subject:x-face:references:x-pgp-fp:x-pgp:x-mailer:x-attribution:pgp:organization:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:face:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=ieVfzJwY3WsuQq7Njt6D8kg2zD+nkoNbix2OrGvpp4FLBhOSonCH1cft0q65PQqbbihkM+njNI92PKzfbNt0LlBAyysVcEydMX22w/E3bcuGS8c1V7IOgdK5mpHdOyXYcn8fqzQbeGJIdzKQg96ytKwXRCGOHNgDEGtXghdQpeM= Received: by 10.140.82.40 with SMTP id f40mr3634622rvb.0.1200814440350; Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:34:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from chateau.d.lf ( [122.162.250.143]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c3sm9207979rvf.37.2008.01.19.23.33.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:34:00 -0800 (PST) To: wahjava.ml@gmail.com (Ashish Shukla =?utf-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3IOCktg==?= =?utf-8?B?4KWB4KSV4KWN4KSy?=) X-Face: "\:nMpJ)EA!j>2nEu-[(+&o:N+CtL^AS\, Jv*LO5qBr#W2.\=d <877ii5fsh0.fsf@chateau.d.lf> <47928A73.2040904@onetel.com> <87tzl97z0y.fsf@chateau.d.lf> X-PGP-FP: 1E00 4679 77E4 F8EE 2E4B 56F2 1F2F 8410 762E 5E74 X-PGP: 762E5E74 X-Mailer: Gnus/5.11 (Oort 5.11) Emacs/22.1.50.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-Attribution: =?utf-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3?= PGP: 762E5E74 Organization: /\/0/\/3 From: wahjava.ml@gmail.com (Ashish Shukla =?utf-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3IA==?= =?utf-8?B?4KS24KWB4KSV4KWN4KSy?=) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:04:11 +0530 In-Reply-To: <87tzl97z0y.fsf@chateau.d.lf> ("Ashish Shukla =?utf-8?B?4KSG?= =?utf-8?B?4KS24KWA4KS3IOCktuClgeCkleCljeCksiIncw==?= message of "Sun\, 20 Jan 2008 12\:40\:37 +0530") Message-ID: <87lk6l7xxo.fsf@chateau.d.lf> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEVfX1/8/PwTExMDAwO0 tLSampr////f398oKCi/v78MDAwICAihq32EAAACU0lEQVQ4jW3UvWvbQBQA8LOJsJIsOajtZAtH Aqq8FLQUvNjhCex2UYpE7XYytPJalxJnFMImqrOkIJfcZtwGgrqEhELQ/XN9p+jLbc+Drfvx7r17 9jNxszXCV2mR9P3ACoKAOM5bugn1hRBRFAnxeErLMN4RIpbwYKwmZfgkMGDNol8PhlFrFDDalQcx BMMwXpwV8KElYqYzpmOA0a4UsC/EmrEU4ptGDq9kghTabP09g9EuFiSpJQOYXslgrEd6Aj8Q7pl+ kcFH3NRlUTIFfvyZwV4sEzwV20a4y2A/BWEYLxdYwk0Gn+Mohfa2X4bXsn8StC0uYdVI4T02cK0F is15ArcZYKeER5Q+f4JofZZHiPshJPt8BwtPrp4kF+KOp+sdpjvOjqpf3n+1bD6dTjk3ySKuZVU1 ezcdpm3h/pL4h9eP3Rw6R5bqa9t86a/1W3OVd7dpzgBMx8YAxVFgvgmqDTwEdQignOVgI1ggoQMA x40CFHzmCHgXcEoAig39MOSATTGt5znQL4qDIRIgNK2LAqYWAl47lBGDSgHNjoOt6vdDkNAtQc9E wN0EJgXQN7aMSABIGU7mMiI5CtQJzX9w9PwQYOApVqBwCMqwp9lmkKzh0qM5uPTAn/Vw0ogazK9m JRjR6pHqEVyqd1XbgPPfKkgAddClxRi49NmKcNMh+JV4T7mzqW1e2jwk3pAPjugGuCfHPLRIP/Qr tLEB9daW7HrvcLIx55i/9zjkfMlO//pnwLHyPcupzrL9AtxrFgTaN/dfGFcjreb+B9wmnzaKpz8p dKsBFjzeRQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: =?UTF-8?B?4KSG4KS24KWA4KS3IOCktuClgeCkleCljeCksg==?= Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Chris Whitehouse Subject: Re: localhost in sudoers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:34:01 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:40:35 +0000, Chris Whitehouse said: Chris> I think my question really is why doesn't sudoers recognise loca= lhost Chris> or 127.0.0.1? And, BtW, while enumerating network interfaces, it skips those interfaces which're DOWN or LOOPBACK. If you've more questions, the quickest way is to checkout source code :) . HTH =2D-=20 Ashish Shukla =E0=A4=86=E0=A4=B6=E0=A5=80=E0=A4=B7 =E0=A4=B6=E0=A5=81=E0=A4= =95=E0=A5=8D=E0=A4=B2 http://wahjava.wordpress.com/ =C2=B7-- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7=C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7--- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7=C2= =B7- =C2=B7- =C2=B7--=C2=B7-=C2=B7 --=C2=B7 -- =C2=B7- =C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7-= =C2=B7=C2=B7 =C2=B7-=C2=B7-=C2=B7- -=C2=B7-=C2=B7 --- -- --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHkvlzHy+EEHYuXnQRAhJcAKDQd8wsyiF5r0UnP1wAKXL92hX+FACfcc5V 6k2yQ+hc1nxnadwBcj/QyYU= =0TKh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 08:11:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2C016A4FD for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:11:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitrovi58@yahoo.com) Received: from web56814.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web56814.mail.re3.yahoo.com [66.196.97.88]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1231E13C447 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:11:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitrovi58@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 37002 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Jan 2008 08:11:27 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=B12xeelY94bf9u+BWFkw5MYft2ZYDRPks6jkKWexlrzM6YNdZv/81eCpzAvkcz0Y1UUnjgE7ZJsx5RFdPmTOyHs0q2uH1josfNEy7spvEzM3yyZkFeIAavEefVM/domXm3V6t8V46lvbRzVFUAAeR8AcTlvHf9KzgD2sVFF4EDw=; X-YMail-OSG: kcpK6hEVM1lxxkBdOxm4WH5yzZ4bM9GBLB1F8hMNAqDcdV48cG9nk.e0_dTVhM_SNVPHAD_vJvOlT18.csQHdVv6cKsBM9OHCoNi_HMxloHBWqxMxz4Q6NJaRqALMg-- Received: from [85.196.191.64] by web56814.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:11:27 PST Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:11:27 -0800 (PST) From: ivan dimitrov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <317771.35090.qm@web56814.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: error messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:11:28 -0000 hi list, on ttyv0 i am getting nonstop following messages: ACPI-0501: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.C002.C003.C004.C158] (Node 0xc363e2a0), AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.C158] (Node 0xc3642820), AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.C15E._BST] (Node 0xc3642760), AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE my question is - what they means and how to stop them ? p.s. the bsd is "FreeBSD HP500 6.2-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #2: Tue Mar 27 22:28:16 CEST 2007 root@sunset:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386" the computer is laptop HP500 thanks in advance i. --------------------------------- Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 08:49:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A9D16A41B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:49:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giorgio_v@mac.com) Received: from smtpoutm.mac.com (smtpoutm.mac.com [17.148.16.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DC6413C44B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:49:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from giorgio_v@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (asmtp008-s [10.150.69.71]) by smtpoutm.mac.com (Xserve/smtpout015/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id m0K8nXEo014523 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:49:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from alichino.refactor.it (88-149-177-167.static.ngi.it [88.149.177.167]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/asmtp008/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id m0K8nT72011674 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 00:49:31 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <16143691-5D0B-4248-84BE-37FBDE40FEA5@mac.com> From: Giorgio Valoti To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080120002209.04e18225@gumby.homeunix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:49:29 +0100 References: <70F64C4A-51CB-4301-B7C5-200FD8D5BC41@mac.com> <20080120002209.04e18225@gumby.homeunix.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) Subject: Re: portupgrade: the -P options rarely works X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:49:33 -0000 On 20/gen/08, at 01:22, RW wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:35:42 +0100 > Giorgio Valoti wrote: > >> Hi all, >> I=92ve noticed that using the -P option with portupgrade, which = should >> try to fetch the binary version of a package rarely works. Most of >> the times it tries to fetch the package from the freebsd site, it >> fails and then proceed to build it from the sources. >> While I can expect from to time that a pre-compiled version of a >> package to be unavailable, it surprises me to see this so many times. > > Are you aware that you need to pick-up stable packages, rather than > release packages, for portupgrade -P to work properly? Well, no. What is the way to distinguish between stable and release? -- Giorgio Valoti From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 09:41:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F107116A419 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:41:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555CB13C447 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:41:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aquarius.dyndns.org (athedsl-318563.home.otenet.gr [85.72.100.1]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m0K9fKUB010128 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:41:21 +0200 Message-ID: <47931740.4000004@otenet.gr> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:41:20 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 6.3-RELEASE DVD torrent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:41:25 -0000 Just to let everyone know, I created a torrent with a DVD iso of 6.3-RELEASE. Useful if you intend to install packages from the media and want to avoid disc swapping. Contains all three CDs plus the docs CD and can be used like standard media (i.e. boot and install). If you have already downloaded the three CDs, you can naturally create your own DVD, instructions are on this page: http://www.pa.msu.edu/~tigner/bsddvd.html (need a small adjustment to account for the third CD) For those that cannot be bothered, here is the torrent: http://www.tuxdistro.com/torrents-details.php?id=820 Thanks to all contributors for a great RELEASE! Manolis From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 10:20:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2969B16A418 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:20:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (smtp5-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93E813C45A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:20:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598213F614F; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:20:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from Llea.celt.neu (ron34-3-82-236-236-194.fbx.proxad.net [82.236.236.194]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3CD53F6191; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:20:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from Llea.celt.neu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Llea.celt.neu (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0K9K24m046007; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:20:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: (from michael@localhost) by Llea.celt.neu (8.14.1/8.13.8/Submit) id m0K9K2gm046006; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:20:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) X-Authentication-Warning: Llea.celt.neu: michael set sender to michael.grunewald@laposte.net using -f To: "Kelly Jones" References: <26face530801191541i60740ba3g5dd5ba24dbaadf39@mail.gmail.com> From: michael.grunewald@laposte.net (=?iso-8859-15?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?=) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:20:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: <26face530801191541i60740ba3g5dd5ba24dbaadf39@mail.gmail.com> (Kelly Jones's message of "Sat\, 19 Jan 2008 16\:41\:26 -0700") Message-ID: <86abn0j1ku.fsf@Llea.celt.neu> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recovering data from a newfs filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:20:15 -0000 "Kelly Jones" writes: > Months ago, I got a new USB drive for my Mac OS X, did "newfs > /dev/disk1" on it, and it's been working fine. > > I then foolishly did "disklabel -create /dev/disk1", which broke > it. How can I recover my data? I've tried fsck w/ alternate > superblocks to no avail. Create a disk image with dd(1), connect the image to a md device with mdconfig(8) and run a disk image analysis tool on it, like testdisk (available from the ports). If testdisk manages to recover disk structure and you're happy with it, you can use the corrected image back to the USB drive with dd(1). Creating the disk image is optional, but since you'll allow testdisk to modifiy the data it works on, it's bet to do a copy. You may want to test integrity of the image with sha256(1) and/or md5(1), before running disk analysis software on it. Notes: 1/I do not know if mdconfig(8) is available for OS-X, although something is likely to provide the same functionality; 2/On Mac OS-X you may use PKGSRC (see NetBSD website) or Fink to install disk analysis software. --=20 Best wishes, Micha=EBl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 10:25:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137B616A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (smtp5-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E9D13C458 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:25:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CEB3F61CB; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:25:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from Llea.celt.neu (ron34-3-82-236-236-194.fbx.proxad.net [82.236.236.194]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0723F61B2; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:25:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from Llea.celt.neu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Llea.celt.neu (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0K9PQh3046027; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:25:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: (from michael@localhost) by Llea.celt.neu (8.14.1/8.13.8/Submit) id m0K9POpb046026; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:25:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) X-Authentication-Warning: Llea.celt.neu: michael set sender to michael.grunewald@laposte.net using -f To: ann kok References: <174078.33010.qm@web53310.mail.re2.yahoo.com> From: michael.grunewald@laposte.net (=?iso-8859-15?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?=) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:25:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: <174078.33010.qm@web53310.mail.re2.yahoo.com> (ann kok's message of "Fri\, 18 Jan 2008 10\:28\:16 -0800 \(PST\)") Message-ID: <863assj1bw.fsf@Llea.celt.neu> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Paul Schmehl , fbsdq@peterk.org, FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Shell scripting kungfu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:25:43 -0000 ann kok writes: > how about this > > cat file | sed 's/\/32//g' |tr -s "," "\n" Hi, `cat' is an overused tool :) --=20 Best regards, Micha=EBl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 11:11:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C200816A418 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:11:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de) Received: from mailgw27.noc.fraunhofer.de (mailgw2-out.fraunhofer.de [153.96.1.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C408B13C46B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:11:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de) Received: from mailgw27.noc.fraunhofer.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw27.noc.fraunhofer.de (8.13.5+/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m0KAeUJ7013168; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:40:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from pluto.fokus.fraunhofer.de (pluto.fokus.fraunhofer.de [195.37.77.164]) by mailgw27.noc.fraunhofer.de (8.13.5+/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m0KAeQ4g012850 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:40:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from EXCHSRV.fokus.fraunhofer.de (bohr [10.147.9.231]) by pluto.fokus.fraunhofer.de (8.13.7/8.13.7) with SMTP id m0KAGnUI010457; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:16:49 +0100 (MET) Received: from rigel ([10.147.65.195]) by EXCHSRV.fokus.fraunhofer.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:16:50 +0100 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:16:49 +0100 From: Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) To: bob89@wb4jcm.org Message-ID: <47931f91.a8CsPAn0ysgEw5dM%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: <47927842.9laQQcD/42mYWXA0%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> <200801192231.46700.bob89@bobj.org> In-Reply-To: <200801192231.46700.bob89@bobj.org> User-Agent: nail 11.22 3/20/05 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jan 2008 10:16:50.0046 (UTC) FILETIME=[9204D9E0:01C85B4D] X-Fraunhofer-Email-Policy: accepted Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wrong times written by mkisofs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:11:32 -0000 Bob Johnson wrote: > > Let me asume you use a _recent_ mkisofs and set up a correct timezone... > > > [...] > > > > What do you get from "mkisofs -version"? > > mkisofs 2.01 (i386-unknown-freebsd6.2) This is nearly 4 years old, why don't you use a recent version? recent is 2.01.01a37 > > What timezone do you have (how many hours from GMT and which location)? > > U.S. Eastern Standard Time (EST = GMT-5) > > > What do you have in the TZ= variable? > > It seems to be empty. So you run your system in GMT? > > What do you see with "TZ=GMT ls -l ToJoe"? > > # TZ=GMT ls -l /mnt > total 62113 > -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 2246671 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0660_080115_2348.JPG > -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3346787 Jan 19 12:22 IMG_0661_080116_0524.JPG You see, it did not change > These times are the correct LOCAL time, not GMT. The following are five hours > off: > > # TZ=EST ls -l /mnt > total 62113 > -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 2246671 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0660_080115_2348.JPG > -rw------- 1 bobj bobj 3346787 Jan 19 07:22 IMG_0661_080116_0524.JPG You know these times already? Something is wrong anyway, but I cannot help from remote.... Jörg -- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 11:26:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B6616A41B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitrovi58@yahoo.com) Received: from web56811.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web56811.mail.re3.yahoo.com [66.196.97.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A93D713C469 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitrovi58@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 18105 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Jan 2008 11:26:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=sjYymi2LaQ4iXB7yhqaNVnUMwGMK5DP19PsoJb+nwrM7UqZKZ/F8wnjLrwtbNIaTvhk/382f/KX/3YEHV00/sX+IAsz49Eq35Ohf9N1m/jXyeUbvfpit15AEaAzgZuQPW5BWu3Aa4melU2J3OLCBhKi79XRXLk1IiDhspM38ouY=; X-YMail-OSG: tM6MNzYVM1lKldMk03Wt0WFM15JS5SpgdKrZT3SWgtVbHZ7RzpUAKJ72v5lHsJKTH7v3xJRw5t5wDxnJljMYHlgLPat7OEmUnjXwWfkf6lc6abYtoTWwwcTyAShkoQ-- Received: from [85.196.191.64] by web56811.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:26:08 PST Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 03:26:08 -0800 (PST) From: ivan dimitrov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <181272.6467.qm@web56811.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: how to setup USB-Serial bridge? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:26:10 -0000 hi list i have a usb-serial bridge # port 3 addr 4: full speed, power 100 mA, config 1, USB-Serial Controller(0x2303), Prolific Technology Inc.(0x067b), rev 3.00 and i guess that the corresponding file is "crw-rw---- 1 root mount 0, 131 Jan 20 09:59 /dev/ugen1.3"? but it seems that it needs additional configuration, because when i am going to use it, i am getting: "avrdude: ser_open(): can't open device "/dev/ugen1.3": Device not configured" so, the question is: how to mount/setup a usb-serial bridge? regards i. --------------------------------- Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 11:28:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7364916A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:28:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from raven.bwct.de (raven.bwct.de [85.159.14.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E991A13C455 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:28:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de ([10.1.1.7]) by raven.bwct.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m0KAueGt052256; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:56:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [10.1.1.14]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m0KAtgS3025606 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:55:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m0KAtfmr023770; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:55:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id m0KAtfIG023769; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:55:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:55:41 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: Greg Mars Message-ID: <20080120105540.GB22192@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <47928642.2090707@gmail.com> <4792A17E.9060208@hdk5.net> <4792B383.6010406@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4792B383.6010406@gmail.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.4-STABLE alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599 autolearn=unavailable version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on cicely12.cicely.de Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, noc@hdk5.net Subject: Re: Realtek 8111B LAN Chipset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:28:52 -0000 On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 09:35:47PM -0500, Greg Mars wrote: > NetOpsCenter wrote: > >Greg Mars wrote: > >>I'm buying parts for a computer and want to make sure that the core > >>components are as freebsd friendly as possible. So far, I've decided > >>on a core 2 quad q6600 and I'm choosing the motherboard now. However > >>it seems many of the popular motherboards have Realtek ALC888 as > >>built-in audio and Realtek 8111B as built-in LAN. > >>I read at: > >> > >>http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/CURRENT/hardware/i386/article.html > >> > >>that the sound should work but I couldn't find any info on the LAN. > >>Does anyone on the list have any experience with it? > >> > >>By the way, I'm going to run FreeBSD 7. > >>_______________________________________________ > >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > >Aloha, > > > >Realtek 8169 is a 1000 M and works on 7.* and 8.* I think 8111 maybe > >old 100M ? Are you sure about the Realtek model #? > > > > > >~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740 > > + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org + noc@hdk5.net + > > + http://aloha50.net - Supporting - FreeBSD 6.* - 7.* + > >"All that's really worth doing is what we do for others."- Lewis Carrol > > > > > > > Hi, > > If you click on the motherboard specifications link below, you'll see > where they list the LAN chipset as Realtek 8111B > > http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813186133 > > This seems to be the page for the chip on Realtek's site: > > http://www.realtek.com.tw/products/productsView.aspx?Langid=1&PFid=5&Level=5&Conn=4&ProdID=11 Realtek has two devices for Gbit PCI: the 8169 and the reduced 8110. They are both more or less the same - likely even the same chip inside, but the later has pins reduced. AFAIK the later can't have an external PHY, which you can't have anyway if there is neither a connector or PHY itself connected on the board. The 8168 is the successor for PCI express, with the 8111 being the new reduced variant. Both PCIe are detected but didn't run stable with our re(4), but it is said that the latest driver fixes this and also adds a good speed improvement. -- B.Walter http://www.bwct.de http://www.fizon.de bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de support@fizon.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 12:12:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE3916A419 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:12:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (filter2-tmobile.zx.nl [194.187.76.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC2F13C465 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:12:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7261C72F1; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:38:43 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zx.nl Received: from filter2-tmobile.zx.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (filter2.zx.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10127) with ESMTP id thIHT8-whhbM; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:38:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [91.141.136.99]) by filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:38:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <479332DE.4030204@student.utwente.nl> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:39:10 +0000 From: "Alphons \"Fonz\" van Werven" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ivan dimitrov References: <317771.35090.qm@web56814.mail.re3.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <317771.35090.qm@web56814.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: error messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:12:05 -0000 ivan dimitrov wrote: > ACPI-0501: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE [snip] > my question is - what they means and how to stop them ? I'm no expert on laptops, but it seems to me that you have either misconfigured ACPI or a laptop that doesn't support ACPI in the first place. My suggestion is that you turn off ACPI, at least until somebody who knows more about laptops than I do comes along to point out exactly what's wrong. In the meantime, perhaps APM will work properly. So you might want to give that a try. Hth, Fonz -- VISTA - Viruses Intruders Spyware Trojans Adware From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 12:19:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5C416A46B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:19:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1359413C520; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:19:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47933C46.4010407@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:19:18 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: s3raphi References: <14977783.post@talk.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <14977783.post@talk.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 syncache problems under high load X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:19:22 -0000 s3raphi wrote: > This looks similar to something that has already been fixed in July. I am > assuming that the July fix is included in RC1? > http://www.nabble.com/FreeBSD-7-TCP-syncache-fix%3A-request-for-testers-to11515217.html#a11776616 Yes. Please follow up on net@ and with a PR if no immediate solution is found. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 12:27:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B4916A418 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-out-04.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C5513C45B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:27:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-av-01.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-04.forthnet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0KC2a8T032400; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:02:36 +0200 Received: from MX-IN-02.forthnet.gr (mx-in-02.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.185]) by mx-av-01.forthnet.gr (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0KC2abI025346; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:02:36 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (ppp56-165.adsl.forthnet.gr [62.1.112.165]) by MX-IN-02.forthnet.gr (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0KC2YuQ019867; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:02:35 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-02.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-02.forthnet.gr header.from=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; sender-id=neutral Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0KC2Xag056625; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:02:34 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m0KC2Wqx056554; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:02:32 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:02:29 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Joerg Schilling Message-ID: <20080120120229.GA42709@kobe.laptop> References: <47927842.9laQQcD/42mYWXA0%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> <200801192231.46700.bob89@bobj.org> <47931f91.a8CsPAn0ysgEw5dM%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47931f91.a8CsPAn0ysgEw5dM%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, bob89@wb4jcm.org Subject: Re: Wrong times written by mkisofs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:27:23 -0000 On 2008-01-20 11:16, Joerg Schilling wrote: >Bob Johnson wrote: >>> Let me asume you use a _recent_ mkisofs and set up a correct timezone... >>> >>[...] >>> >>> What do you get from "mkisofs -version"? >> >> mkisofs 2.01 (i386-unknown-freebsd6.2) > > This is nearly 4 years old, why don't you use a recent version? > recent is 2.01.01a37 FWIW, 2.01 is the version available in the Ports tree as `sysutils/cdrtools'. The 2.01.01a37 version is available too, as `cdrtools-devel'. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 12:36:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F50C16A41A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:36:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA7D13C455 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:36:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0KCZhkK002433; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:35:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0KCZVYh002430; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:35:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:35:31 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: ivan dimitrov In-Reply-To: <181272.6467.qm@web56811.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20080120133505.U2391@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <181272.6467.qm@web56811.mail.re3.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to setup USB-Serial bridge? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:36:40 -0000 you must have driver for this in kernel (or loaded from modules) it is uplcom(4) driver On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, ivan dimitrov wrote: > hi list > > i have a usb-serial bridge > # port 3 addr 4: full speed, power 100 mA, config 1, USB-Serial Controller(0x2303), Prolific Technology Inc.(0x067b), rev 3.00 > and i guess that the corresponding file is "crw-rw---- 1 root mount 0, 131 Jan 20 09:59 /dev/ugen1.3"? > but it seems that it needs additional configuration, because when i am going to use it, i am getting: > "avrdude: ser_open(): can't open device "/dev/ugen1.3": Device not configured" > so, the question is: how to mount/setup a usb-serial bridge? > > regards > i. > > > > --------------------------------- > Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 12:52:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8E016A420 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:52:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A7013C467 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:52:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so416391anc.13 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:52:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.171.10 with SMTP id t10mr12032059ane.58.1200831847297; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:24:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.102.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x55sm5513826hsx.13.2008.01.20.04.24.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:24:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from obelix (obelix [192.168.17.13]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BF01140C for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:23:58 +0400 (GST) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:23:58 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@obelix.home.rakhesh.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080120161831.L62033@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> X-Blog: http://rakhesh.com/ X-Notes: http://rakhesh.net/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Subject: Fixing a USB disk to a specific device name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:52:38 -0000 Hi, Is it possible to assign a specific device name to a USB disk? As in, say I have 2 USB disks -- currently they appear as da0 and da1. One of these (da0) contains the key for a GELI encrypted partition, and so I mount it from fstab while booting (to get the key). What I'd like to know is whether there's any way for me to ensure that the da0 disk always appears as da0. I don't want it that tomm I plug in another disk (or change the order of disks, though I'll be more careful with that) and suddenly da0 is no longer at da0! That would hamper the boot process ... not nice. Possible? Thanks, - Rakhesh http://rakhesh.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 12:56:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC0116A421 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:56:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from smtp23.orange.fr (smtp23.orange.fr [80.12.242.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5631913C461 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:56:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas@nicoelro.net) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf2361.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 9BCD070000B2 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:56:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from menegroth.nicoelro.net (ALyon-252-1-96-122.w86-202.abo.wanadoo.fr [86.202.223.122]) by mwinf2361.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 678AC70000A7 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:56:43 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20080120125643424.678AC70000A7@mwinf2361.orange.fr Message-ID: <4793450A.60703@nicoelro.net> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:56:42 +0100 From: Nicolas Letellier User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: How use helvetica font? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: nicolas@nicoelro.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:56:45 -0000 Hello, How use Helvetica font with FreeBSD 6.3-Release ? I follow this page (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/fr_FR.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-fonts.html) and installed urwfont but I can't see Helvetica font on OpenOffice or Abiword. see my `pkg_info | grep font` : bdftopcf-1.0.1 bitstream-vera-1.10_4 encodings-1.0.2,1 font-adobe-100dpi-1.0.0_1 font-adobe-75dpi-1.0.0 font-adobe-utopia-100dpi-1.0.1 font-adobe-utopia-75dpi-1.0.1 font-adobe-utopia-type1-1.0.1 font-alias-1.0.1 font-arabic-misc-1.0.0 font-bh-100dpi-1.0.0 font-bh-75dpi-1.0.0 font-bh-lucidatypewriter-100dpi-1.0.0 font-bh-lucidatypewriter-75dpi-1.0.0 font-bh-ttf-1.0.0 font-bh-type1-1.0.0 font-bitstream-100dpi-1.0.0 font-bitstream-75dpi-1.0.0 font-bitstream-type1-1.0.0 font-cursor-misc-1.0.0 font-daewoo-misc-1.0.0 font-dec-misc-1.0.0 font-ibm-type1-1.0.0 font-isas-misc-1.0.0 font-jis-misc-1.0.0 font-micro-misc-1.0.0 font-misc-ethiopic-1.0.0 font-misc-meltho-1.0.0_1 font-misc-misc-1.0.0 font-mutt-misc-1.0.0 font-schumacher-misc-1.0.0 font-sony-misc-1.0.0 font-sun-misc-1.0.0 font-util-1.0.1 font-xfree86-type1-1.0.0 fontcacheproto-0.1.2 fontconfig-2.4.2_2,1 fontsproto-2.0.2 fonttosfnt-1.0.3 freefonts-0.10_3 freetype2-2.3.5 fslsfonts-1.0.1 fstobdf-1.0.2 libXfont-1.3.1_1,1 libXfontcache-1.0.4 libXft-2.1.12 libfontenc-1.0.4 mkfontdir-1.0.3 mkfontscale-1.0.3 p5-type1inst-0.6.1_5 showfont-1.0.1 urwfonts-1.0_2 webfonts-0.30_2 xf86bigfontproto-1.1.2 xfd-1.0.1 xfontsel-1.0.2 xfs-1.0.5,1 xfsinfo-1.0.1 xlsfonts-1.0.2 xorg-fonts-100dpi-7.3 xorg-fonts-75dpi-7.3 xorg-fonts-miscbitmaps-7.3 xorg-fonts-truetype-7.3 xorg-fonts-type1-7.3 However, I can see Helvetica in `fc-list | grep Helvetica` : Helvetica:style=Oblique Helvetica:style=Bold Helvetica:style=Regular Helvetica:style=Bold Oblique Here is my font config in xorg.conf : FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/freefont/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/OTF" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/webfonts/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/bitstream-vera/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/dejavu/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/util/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/encodings/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/URW/" Thanks for your help Nicolas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 13:04:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F3A16A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:04:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=YZz788=SK=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailout14.yourhostingaccount.com (mailout14.yourhostingaccount.com [65.254.253.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0215D13C45B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:04:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=YZz788=SK=vvelox.net=v.velox@yourhostingaccount.com) Received: from mailscan01.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.15.1] helo=mailscan01.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailout14.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1JGZqR-0004ZD-9I for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:04:15 -0500 Received: from impout02.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.55.2] helo=impout02.yourhostingaccount.com) by mailscan01.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtp (Exim) id 1JGZqQ-0002YO-PG; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:04:14 -0500 Received: from authsmtp09.yourhostingaccount.com ([10.1.18.9]) by impout02.yourhostingaccount.com with NO UCE id fR4E1Y0030BkWne0000000; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:04:14 -0500 X-EN-OrigOutIP: 10.1.18.9 X-EN-IMPSID: fR4E1Y0030BkWne0000000 Received: from c-98-206-161-17.hsd1.il.comcast.net ([98.206.161.17] helo=vixen42) by authsmtp09.yourhostingaccount.com with esmtpa (Exim) id 1JGZqQ-00048Z-IE; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:04:14 -0500 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:05:14 -0600 From: "Zane C.B." To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20080120070514.77a3e951@vixen42> In-Reply-To: <4792CF1E.9090806@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20080119200146.323a773c@vixen42> <4792CF1E.9090806@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd6.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EN-UserInfo: 0d1ca1697cdb7a831d4877828571b7ab:1570f0de6936c69fef9e164fffc541bc X-EN-AuthUser: vvelox2 Sender: "Zane C.B." X-EN-OrigIP: 98.206.161.17 X-EN-OrigHost: c-98-206-161-17.hsd1.il.comcast.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: trying to locate a specific port that I forget the name of X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:04:18 -0000 On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:33:34 +0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Zane C.B. wrote: > > I originally saw it in the ports tree, IIRC, about a year ago or > > around there. > > > > What it was was a massive piece of software for connecting > > multiple services allowing them all to be queried. It was capable > > of connecting to IMAP, LDAP, several SQL servers, and a few other > > things. The manual of the software was several hundred pages long. > > > > Any one remember what it is? > > perl ? Nah. From what I remember it was written in Java. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 13:12:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F9F16A46B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:12:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michel@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF1813C457 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:12:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michel@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.2/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id m0KDC749071318 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:12:08 +0100 (CET) X-Ids: 168 Received: from niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.41]) by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67AE2377B1 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:12:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix, from userid 2005) id A2B7D8F; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:12:06 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:12:06 +0100 From: Michel Talon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080120131206.GA64807@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.168]); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:12:08 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/5499/Sun Jan 20 02:31:52 2008 on shiva.jussieu.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 479348A7.003 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! Subject: Re: How use helvetica font? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:12:09 -0000 Nicolas Letellier wrote: > How use Helvetica font with FreeBSD 6.3-Release ? > I follow this page > (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/fr_FR.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-fonts.html) > and installed urwfont but I can't see Helvetica font on OpenOffice or > Abiword. The free version is called Nimbus Sans L. fc-list also shows aliases. By the way, it is not a very good sans serif font. -- Michel TALON From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 13:13:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1713B16A417; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:13:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from fallbackmx06.syd.optusnet.com.au (fallbackmx06.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED1313C442; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:13:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail04.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail04.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.185]) by fallbackmx06.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0K5C23V032086; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:12:02 +1100 Received: from c211-30-219-213.carlnfd3.nsw.optusnet.com.au (c211-30-219-213.carlnfd3.nsw.optusnet.com.au [211.30.219.213]) by mail04.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0K5BuM9006531 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:11:58 +1100 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:11:23 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@delplex.bde.org To: Greg Mars In-Reply-To: <47928642.2090707@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080120160405.E14916@delplex.bde.org> References: <47928642.2090707@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Realtek 8111B LAN Chipset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:13:27 -0000 On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Greg Mars wrote: > I'm buying parts for a computer and want to make sure that the core > components are as freebsd friendly as possible. So far, I've decided on a > core 2 quad q6600 and I'm choosing the motherboard now. Me2 (unless I wait for a newer generation of CPUs). > However it seems many > of the popular motherboards have Realtek ALC888 as built-in audio and Realtek > 8111B as built-in LAN. > I read at: > > http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/CURRENT/hardware/i386/article.html > > that the sound should work but I couldn't find any info on the LAN. > Does anyone on the list have any experience with it? > > By the way, I'm going to run FreeBSD 7. I also want a cheap PCI/e NIC that works well with drivers back to FreeBSD-4 like my plain PCI bge and em NICs do. I doubt that any popular motherboard will have anything better than a cheap PCI/e NIC. Bruce From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 13:37:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335F516A468 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:37:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (filter2-tmobile.zx.nl [194.187.76.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE82513C465 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:37:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0D31C72EE; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:37:46 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zx.nl Received: from filter2-tmobile.zx.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (filter2.zx.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10127) with ESMTP id ACOYBPPw7xXM; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:37:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [91.141.136.99]) by filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:37:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47934EC5.4010509@student.utwente.nl> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:38:13 +0000 From: "Alphons \"Fonz\" van Werven" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Evans References: <47928642.2090707@gmail.com> <20080120160405.E14916@delplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20080120160405.E14916@delplex.bde.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Realtek 8111B LAN Chipset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:37:50 -0000 Bruce Evans wrote: > I also want a cheap PCI/e NIC that works well with drivers back to > FreeBSD-4 like my plain PCI bge and em NICs do. I doubt that any > popular motherboard will have anything better than a cheap PCI/e NIC. Finding a modern main board of which the builtin NIC works with 4.X seems like a tall order to me, perhaps it would be easier to install a seperate NIC. With some luck you might be able to pick up a decent used NIC from a discarded Pentium(2) or something. I've been using a 3Com 3c509 combo card for years. In 3.X the driver was still buggy, but it worked great with 4.X, particularly the later ones, say, 4.5 onwards. Alphons -- VISTA - Viruses Intruders Spyware Trojans Adware From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 14:20:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA9716A469 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67D7C13C4F3 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr4.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0KEKh9N051305; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:20:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 08369B82A; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:20:43 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:20:43 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Rakhesh Sasidharan Message-ID: <20080120142042.GA8576@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Rakhesh Sasidharan , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080120161831.L62033@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080120161831.L62033@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fixing a USB disk to a specific device name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:20:45 -0000 --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 04:23:58PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Is it possible to assign a specific device name to a USB disk? As in, say= I=20 > have 2 USB disks -- currently they appear as da0 and da1. One of these=20 > (da0) contains the key for a GELI encrypted partition, and so I mount it= =20 > from fstab while booting (to get the key). Yes, more or less. =20 > What I'd like to know is whether there's any way for me to ensure that th= e=20 > da0 disk always appears as da0. I don't want it that tomm I plug in anoth= er=20 > disk (or change the order of disks, though I'll be more careful with that= )=20 > and suddenly da0 is no longer at da0! That would hamper the boot process= =20 > ... not nice. It is possible, but not as daX. Use the glabel(8) utility to label your disks. They will show up as /dev/label/ The daX devices are created as the device is plugged in, so AFAIK it's impossible to permanently assign them a certain daX device. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHk1i6EnfvsMMhpyURApgSAJ93TfY784GmJ8wla3v6R8nXrnbmzgCfVEti yruY0Dy8dj9bgY8ACDUV6PU= =bKzJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 15:13:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8974F16A46D for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:13:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB83E13C455 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:13:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so173038nfb.33 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:13:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=5lQ1UiFnNzI72Jli405tjFZfPN5+n1huKPLoaC+tnCE=; b=NGqq+TjpnSoprMeOog3K19/6TzeYkUAwBF5IyoCvnqkIXITNUP+FQacxhUi47b1sDphSmnRZwd9xBbt7Q52+DdauSXYRMIY11V+/Iu4TaIPVqYlJZtqxcDKANn4BDLsoslW0u8W1b3jWARNCybCG/GN+N1VPjdmSclj2HtSXoD4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NC254JT0YrECWxLGnOXSAIX8F1ATPj1eZwzBO8Oxu3aV0mo9J7XzR/6VaMGRTe+30kY1fiq1opZ+YQmnkqbOYcYD3G7ybD/TEyMV8ak8eo3tTEBIrQ2YwAUz4arepZTO4sD5DqwRfaRq4Z6okQkXHpcjp6B6rXoIThauw1WMRjQ= Received: by 10.78.171.20 with SMTP id t20mr7774254hue.41.1200842006179; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:13:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:13:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801200713k3fdda593m4da8c93b23feaa0d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:13:26 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: RW In-Reply-To: <20080120000048.0cee1189@gumby.homeunix.com.> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <94136a2c0801191142r51a7715by99e56ee658621e5d@mail.gmail.com> <20080120000048.0cee1189@gumby.homeunix.com.> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.2-Release to 6.3-Release and automatically merge changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:13:28 -0000 Hello, > Anything in /etc/defaults/ should not have been edited, so just accept > the new version. If you *have* edited it, you'll have to handle this > manually, and put you changes in the right place. I don't think I have ever edited any file in /etc/defaults but then... sometimes my mind plays a trick on me. > > Then it asked about sendmail files which I have never ever touched (I > > do not use sendmail). Some others are not sendmail-related but I have > > not touched them either. > > Accept the new versions. When I have these strings: <<<<<<< current version # $FreeBSD: src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf,v 1.33.2.1 2006/03/08 23:01:18 brueffer Exp $ ======= # $FreeBSD: src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf,v 1.33.2.3.2.1 2007/12/06 08:11:19 jhb Exp $ >>>>>>> 6.3-RELEASE Which lines should I delete and which leave intact? This one here is short but there are some other where the changes apply to quite a few lines. I have trouble finding out how to "accept the new versions"? Thanks! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 15:27:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1876F16A41A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahkha@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00CA13C44B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:27:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahkha@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so2386664pyb.10 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:27:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=UuFXU2EL6dnVq1WU5etrH+N95bl559urtr4whflM7h0=; b=tChxQZ0hF68CL/Ykcs74l1PnHNeuNwA2P9PqKmcNm+CaE5seGWw/vK5cdhJkHqBW6omPlIl0xOObHxAIDyDG2Yz/hO37S2RwFxNkHsluKIUd+MDA3VU3ix0+0e2jowl/zBcDlRdEgowpw1MEoGzHg4Zhw/C1HUXPnpsL2eC8Tls= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=wU8ls/hr5K36SDts0SepUc8oTAc46ne2PxdYQDw5yCwKR2DlPXZwZ5C54IEiTJw5Me+2BfgDm1jHS+pM1bhH2J8VCTN5CLawkL982q5rs7InKhWzicD9+Q4BQZjmQeJn8sN930zHRTKXfGscT0Kecunf7NtKEybZwxsnYB/IwII= Received: by 10.142.84.3 with SMTP id h3mr2835002wfb.34.1200841156240; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:59:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.166.16 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 06:59:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1ce16a2c0801200659x7c51811u6059c4b2420ead08@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:59:16 +0100 From: "Bachman Kharazmi" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: hp nx7300 Dell Wireless 1390 WLAN Mini-PCI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:27:08 -0000 Hi, I've tried to get my wireless card working on Freebsd 7.0RC1 using ndis. I've followed the steps in http://dannyman.toldme.com/2005/01/05/freebsd-howto-ndisulate-windows-drivers/ where everything has been successful. But when I do kldload ./bcmwl5_sys.ko the modules loads. But ifconfig -a doesn't show the wireless device and the blue led on the wlan button is still off (doesn't help pressing it). Anyone who've experienced similar behavior and knows how to get the wireless card working? Driver file extracted from http://ftp.dell.com/network/R112196.EXE pciconf -lv none0@pci0:16:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x1364103c chip=0x431114e4 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Broadcom Corporation' device = 'Dell Wireless 1390 WLAN Mini-PCI Card' class = network venus# kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 22 0xc0400000 926ed4 kernel 2 1 0xc0d27000 14324 snd_hda.ko 3 2 0xc0d3c000 4a5ac sound.ko 4 1 0xc0d87000 6a1c4 acpi.ko 5 1 0xc4500000 22000 linux.ko 6 1 0xc4771000 6000 i915.ko 7 1 0xc4777000 f000 drm.ko 11 1 0xc909b000 92000 bcmwl5_sys.ko 12 1 0xc83ff000 c000 if_ndis.ko 13 2 0xc840b000 16000 ndis.ko [bkw@venus /usr]$ ifconfig -a fwe0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8 ether 02:02:3f:75:2f:0e inet 0.0.0.0 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 255.255.255.255 ch 1 dma 0 fwip0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 lladdr 0.2.3f.99.29.75.2f.e.a.2.ff.fe.0.0.0.0 bfe0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8 ether 00:17:a4:e7:c2:e5 inet 192.168.100.5 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.100.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 Copyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 #0: Mon Dec 24 12:18:24 UTC 2007 root@logan.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) M CPU 440 @ 1.86GHz (1862.02-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6ec Stepping = 12 Features=0xafe9fbff Features2=0xc109 AMD Features=0x100000 real memory = 1065156608 (1015 MB) avail memory = 1028710400 (981 MB) ACPI APIC Table: ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 1 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) hptrr: HPT RocketRAID controller driver v1.1 (Dec 24 2007 12:17:58) acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: [ITHREAD] acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of 100000, 3f700000 (3) failed Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 acpi_ec0: port 0x62,0x66 on acpi0 acpi_hpet0: iomem 0xfed00000-0xfed003ff on acpi0 Timecounter "HPET" frequency 14318180 Hz quality 900 cpu0: on acpi0 p4tcc0: on cpu0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 vgapci0: port 0x4000-0x4007 mem 0xf4400000-0xf447ffff,0xe0000000-0xefffffff,0xf4480000-0xf44bffff irq 16 at device 2.0 on pci0 agp0: on vgapci0 agp0: detected 7932k stolen memory agp0: aperture size is 256M vgapci1: mem 0xf4500000-0xf457ffff at device 2.1 on pci0 pcm0: mem 0xf4580000-0xf4583fff irq 16 at device 27.0 on pci0 pcm0: [ITHREAD] pcib1: irq 16 at device 28.0 on pci0 pci8: on pcib1 pcib2: irq 17 at device 28.1 on pci0 pci16: on pcib2 pci16: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) pcib3: irq 19 at device 28.3 on pci0 pci32: on pcib3 uhci0: port 0x4020-0x403f irq 20 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci0: [ITHREAD] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: on usb0 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0x4040-0x405f irq 17 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci1: [ITHREAD] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: on usb1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0x4060-0x407f irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci2: [ITHREAD] usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: on usb2 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: port 0x4080-0x409f irq 19 at device 29.3 on pci0 uhci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci3: [ITHREAD] usb3: on uhci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: on usb3 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xf4584000-0xf45843ff irq 20 at device 29.7 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ehci0: [ITHREAD] usb4: EHCI version 1.0 usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 usb4: on ehci0 usb4: USB revision 2.0 uhub4: on usb4 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered pcib4: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib4 cbb0: mem 0xf4100000-0xf4100fff irq 18 at device 6.0 on pci2 cardbus0: on cbb0 pccard0: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb0 cbb0: [ITHREAD] fwohci0: <1394 Open Host Controller Interface> mem 0xf4101000-0xf41017ff,0xf4104000-0xf4107fff irq 19 at device 6.1 on pci2 fwohci0: [FILTER] fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=0) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. fwohci0: EUI64 00:02:3f:99:29:75:2f:0e fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 3 ports. fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. firewire0: on fwohci0 fwe0: on firewire0 if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:02:3f:75:2f:0e fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:02:3f:75:2f:0e fwip0: on firewire0 fwip0: Firewire address: 00:02:3f:99:29:75:2f:0e @ 0xfffe00000000, S400, maxrec 2048 sbp0: on firewire0 dcons_crom0: on firewire0 dcons_crom0: bus_addr 0x13d8000 fwohci0: Initiate bus reset fwohci0: BUS reset fwohci0: node_id=0xc000ffc0, gen=2, CYCLEMASTER mode bfe0: mem 0xf4108000-0xf4109fff irq 16 at device 14.0 on pci2 miibus0: on bfe0 bmtphy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 bmtphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto bfe0: using obsoleted if_watchdog interface bfe0: Ethernet address: 00:17:a4:e7:c2:e5 bfe0: [ITHREAD] isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x40a0-0x40af irq 16 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata0: [ITHREAD] ata1: on atapci0 ata1: [ITHREAD] atapci1: port 0x13f0-0x13f7,0x15f4-0x15f7,0x1370-0x1377,0x1574-0x1577,0x40d0-0x40df mem 0xf4585000-0xf45853ff irq 17 at device 31.2 on pci0 atapci1: [ITHREAD] atapci1: AHCI Version 01.10 controller with 4 ports detected ata2: on atapci1 ata2: [ITHREAD] ata3: on atapci1 ata3: port not implemented ata3: [ITHREAD] ata4: on atapci1 ata4: port not implemented ata4: [ITHREAD] ata5: on atapci1 ata5: port not implemented ata5: [ITHREAD] battery0: on acpi0 battery1: on acpi0 acpi_acad0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 acpi_lid0: on acpi0 acpi_tz0: on acpi0 acpi_tz0: _CRT value is absurd, ignored (256.0C) acpi_tz1: on acpi0 acpi_tz2: on acpi0 acpi_tz3: on acpi0 acpi_tz4: on acpi0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] atkbd0: [ITHREAD] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: [ITHREAD] psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcffff pnpid ORM0000 on isa0 ppc0: parallel port not found. sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 8250 or not responding sio0: [FILTER] sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 1862016394 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec hptrr: no controller detected. firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <= 0, cable IRM = 0 (me) firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) fwohci0: phy int acpi_tz0: _CRT value is absurd, ignored (256.0C) acd0: DVDR at ata0-master PIO4 ad4: 76319MB at ata2-master SATA150 pcm0: pcm0: Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad4s2a drm0: on vgapci0 info: [drm] AGP at 0xe0000000 256MB info: [drm] Initialized i915 1.5.0 20060119 drm0: [ITHREAD] acpi_tz0: _CRT value is absurd, ignored (256.0C) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 15:31:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213BB16A41B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:31:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D302A13C4D1 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:31:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 20 Jan 2008 10:31:07 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id OHP80030; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:31:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 20 Jan 2008 10:30:05 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18323.26937.976238.901116@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:31:05 -0500 To: "Alphons \"Fonz\" van Werven" In-Reply-To: <47934EC5.4010509@student.utwente.nl> References: <47928642.2090707@gmail.com> <20080120160405.E14916@delplex.bde.org> <47934EC5.4010509@student.utwente.nl> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: FreeBSD Questions , Bruce Evans Subject: Re: Realtek 8111B LAN Chipset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:31:11 -0000 "Alphons \"Fonz\" van Werven" writes: > > I also want a cheap PCI/e NIC that works well with drivers > > back toFreeBSD-4 like my plain PCI bge and em NICs do. I > > doubt that any popular motherboard will have anything better > > than a cheap PCI/e NIC. > > Finding a modern main board of which the builtin NIC works with > 4.X seems like a tall order to me, perhaps it would be easier to > install a seperate NIC. > > With some luck you might be able to pick up a decent used NIC > from a discarded Pentium(2) or something. I've been using a 3Com > 3c509 combo card for years. In 3.X the driver was still buggy, > but it worked great with 4.X, particularly the later ones, say, > 4.5 onwards. Not responding to the above directly, but: 1) RealTek has a reputation for making cheap-ass cards - not just "point-and-laugh", but "point-and-spit". 2) If you're going with a separate card, allow me to recommend the Intel Pro/1000 series. Major manufacturer, driver written by Intel (and the maintainer responds promptly to issues), and available for ~$25 on eBay. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 15:37:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB21616A418 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A6113C4D1 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0KFbv1p034658; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:37:57 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m0KFbv5M034655; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:37:57 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:37:57 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: ivan dimitrov In-Reply-To: <181272.6467.qm@web56811.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20080120083627.V34577@wonkity.com> References: <181272.6467.qm@web56811.mail.re3.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:37:57 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to setup USB-Serial bridge? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:37:59 -0000 On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, ivan dimitrov wrote: > hi list > > i have a usb-serial bridge > # port 3 addr 4: full speed, power 100 mA, config 1, USB-Serial Controller(0x2303), Prolific Technology Inc.(0x067b), rev 3.00 > and i guess that the corresponding file is "crw-rw---- 1 root mount 0, 131 Jan 20 09:59 /dev/ugen1.3"? > but it seems that it needs additional configuration, because when i am going to use it, i am getting: > "avrdude: ser_open(): can't open device "/dev/ugen1.3": Device not configured" > so, the question is: how to mount/setup a usb-serial bridge? kldload uplcom (or build it into your kernel) attach usb-serial adapter use /dev/cuaU0 -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 15:47:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF73516A419 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:47:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A174E13C4D3 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:47:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0KFlDFu069066 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:47:13 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:47:13 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801200947.13279.freebsd08@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on pollux.dfwlp.com Subject: check processes started by inetd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 15:47:16 -0000 how can i check to see the processes that have been started by inetd? i mean other than reading the inetd.conf file... but something like top or something that shows me the processes that are actually running? thanks, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org freebsd08 _@_ dfwlp.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 16:06:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CD316A41A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52ADA13C458 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so2401770pyb.10 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:06:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=S/dKcYv0NWM5wthG4MgkjzoNaOvIi9RLusTi562OkUo=; b=woP42wE7BRUtkOWcYk3T82PkocZF1vbhPLYcxlkWO5DRpf5ljVWC21AD4XTPJLokOq8CExlRNSEoYlC+jcIXijk4AbKsG6hFAPES0iru7wy9E/ZQmcGpErSHifdyTW5gqsTwF7rIIfP5J51seqRQxTovjBnOLGpFZAZMOHRaluk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ciGCornMoWqXyPLihj6AmQcwoC6nYcy+p0JOQZ/6JxDPlY0+ROBJ8HLYvzrvrvQ6vWHPkIRFay2xUjdISKN24MGDAP1GNGo/RmExiQj8Zki/tjVKNOmmf5sPKShg/fVhoePc9yVI09XtW0cWXHQQdZPJwY52KJx8U1sY2oK2VhY= Received: by 10.65.44.5 with SMTP id w5mr12514951qbj.45.1200845175174; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:06:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz ( [67.85.89.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e18sm4505759qbe.29.2008.01.20.08.06.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 08:06:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47937174.2050400@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:06:12 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080117) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan Horne References: <200801200947.13279.freebsd08@dfwlp.com> In-Reply-To: <200801200947.13279.freebsd08@dfwlp.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: check processes started by inetd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:06:17 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan Horne wrote: > how can i check to see the processes that have been started by > inetd? i mean other than reading the inetd.conf file... but > something like top or something that shows me the processes that > are actually running? > Telnet to the port they are on -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHk3F0Qi2hk2LEXBARAkmJAKD6Po+DQF2PEr0SExtXYdjC1ZSAJACfZTKp 0g+iGDbe3pXXWDtejfw6FK4= =xP6D -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 16:43:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48ECA16A421 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:43:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242A713C459 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:43:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0KGhdDK070619 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:43:39 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:43:39 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200801200947.13279.freebsd08@dfwlp.com> <47937174.2050400@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <47937174.2050400@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801201043.39691.freebsd08@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on pollux.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: check processes started by inetd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:43:42 -0000 On Sunday 20 January 2008 10:06:12 am Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > Jonathan Horne wrote: > > how can i check to see the processes that have been started by > > inetd? i mean other than reading the inetd.conf file... but > > something like top or something that shows me the processes that > > are actually running? > > Telnet to the port they are on > well thats actually the problem im trying to troubleshoot... why the ports are not accessable. -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org freebsd08 _@_ dfwlp.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 16:45:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595A516A418 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:45:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBA713C458 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:45:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0KGjtd4070730 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:45:55 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:45:54 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801201045.55020.freebsd08@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on pollux.dfwlp.com Subject: running your own tinderbox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:45:57 -0000 anyone running their own tinderbox? i signed up for the tinderbox list (at the authors site), but so far its been dead. im interested in learning to run my own for the ports and worlds i need for my systems, so im looking for some tips, tricks, or caveats. anyone? cheers, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org freebsd08 _@_ dfwlp.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 17:04:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD58016A418 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:04:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from cenn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com (cenn.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A77C13C46A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:04:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from mail.tcbug.org (mail.tcbug.org [208.42.70.163]) by cenn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE868135; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:45:14 -0600 (CST) Received: from build64.tcbug.org (unknown [208.42.70.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tcbug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E432149809; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:45:13 -0600 (CST) From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, robert@webtent.com Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:44:54 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <1200788115.9650.13.camel@columbus.webtent.org> In-Reply-To: <1200788115.9650.13.camel@columbus.webtent.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart6190899.czbdFnf5IS"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200801201045.12904.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: Subject: Re: compiling kernel with PAE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:04:29 -0000 --nextPart6190899.czbdFnf5IS Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 19 January 2008 06:15:15 pm Robert Fitzpatrick wrote: > Getting an error when trying to compile a kernel on 5.4 and 6.2 with the > PAE option. I've tried NO_MODULES in make.conf as well... > > se2 -ffreestanding -Werror /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c > /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c: In function `adv_action': > /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c:260: warning: cast from pointer to > integer of different size *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WEBTENT. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > > This is a custom kernel build with the QUOTA option, I take out the PAE > option and all makes fine. I did a src-all update with RELENG_VER tag > prior to building. I assume this is a driver issue compatible with PAE? > > Also, can I run amd64 release on this Intel Xeon dual proc with 6GB RAM? > Thinking about loading 6.3 amd64 if possible. Excuse my ignorance, I am > not a hardware guy, I am a programmer. > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz (3000.12-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin =3D "GenuineIntel" Id =3D 0xf41 Stepping =3D 1 > =20 > Features=3D0xbfebfbffA,C MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > Features2=3D0x641d> > AMD Features=3D0x20100000 > Logical CPUs per core: 2 PAE is a horrible hack, and even if you figured out why it won't compile=20 (probably an incompatable driver in your kernel) it's slow. That particula= r=20 CPU will run FreeBSD/amd64 just fine. (I happen to have one) The drawback= s=20 to FreeBSD/amd64 are mainly in the desktop arena. If this is a server I'd = go=20 for it. =2D-=20 Thanks, Josh Paetzel PGP: 8A48 EF36 5E9F 4EDA 5A8C 11B4 26F9 01F1 27AF AECB --nextPart6190899.czbdFnf5IS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBHk3qYJvkB8SevrssRAp0JAJ0bKQ6AqpS0USvObtOC/4wFWNy9TwCgigSt 2hHbQaZKWdhwsNpeUw41XUU= =J5vC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart6190899.czbdFnf5IS-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 17:11:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7774F16A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:11:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michel@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155BD13C442 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:11:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michel@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.2/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id m0KHBSWj072491 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:11:28 +0100 (CET) X-Ids: 166 Received: from niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.41]) by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22F42371F9 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:11:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix, from userid 2005) id 9D8508F; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:11:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:11:27 +0100 From: Michel Talon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080120171127.GA65446@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.166]); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:11:28 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/5499/Sun Jan 20 02:31:52 2008 on shiva.jussieu.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 479380C0.003 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! Subject: Re: Realtek 8111B LAN Chipset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:11:30 -0000 Bruce Evans said: > I also want a cheap PCI/e NIC that works well with drivers back to > FreeBSD-4 like my plain PCI bge and em NICs do. I doubt that any > popular motherboard will have anything better than a cheap PCI/e NIC. I have recently upgraded an old machine with a good AGP video card to a Core 2 Duo processor. I have found an Asrock motherboard which supports such processor, but also both AGP and PCI-e video cards, both IDE and SATA disks, etc. so one can keep old parts. The chipset is from VIA and works well as far as i can see, and moreover doesn't overheat and supports passive cooling. The integrated NIC is the traditional ViaRhine, and it works under all versions of FreeBSD. Audio is supported by hda driver in recent FreeBSD. http://www.asrock.com/mb/overview.asp?Model=4COREDUAL-VSTA This mobo is very cheap (around 50 euros here). Coupled to a cheap Core 2 Duo this gives a good and *very quiet* machine for a surprising small amount of money (i spent less than 150 euros for the mobo, the processor and a new power supply). The performance is light years ahead of the previous Athlon, and the fan sound which was very present is now almost unaudible. -- Michel TALON From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 17:12:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEEE916A420 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:12:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from viefep12-int.chello.at (viefep18-int.chello.at [213.46.255.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0115313C465 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:12:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from [192.168.2.175] (really [80.99.169.3]) by viefep12-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20080120171242.NQRB22769.viefep12-int.chello.at@[192.168.2.175]>; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:12:42 +0100 Message-ID: <4793810B.1090901@shopzeus.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:12:43 +0100 From: Laszlo Nagy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steve Bertrand References: <478F64CF.7000603@shopzeus.com> <478F7142.8040506@ibctech.ca> <478F731B.5050201@shopzeus.com> <478F8732.4040208@shopzeus.com> In-Reply-To: <478F8732.4040208@shopzeus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: routing question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:12:45 -0000 Laszlo Nagy írta: > >>> - ping from pc on 0.0 network to 192.168.2.138 >>> >> Well, I cannot do this from here. Those computers are X terminals, >> they do not run inetd nor sshd. I cannot login from here and I cannot >> leave now, but I can do it later if necessary. >> >>> - sysctl -a net.inet.ip.forwarding (on the GatewayComp) >>> >> cassiopeia# sysctl -a net.inet.ip.forwarding >> net.inet.ip.forwarding: 1 >> cassiopeia# >> >> >> I can answer the missed question in about an hour. > > I'm sorry, not today. I'll try tomorrow. I did it. It was not working: could not ping 192.168.2.138 from 192.168.0.114. Then I added a static route -net 192.168.2.0 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0 and it started to work. But here is something I still do not understand. The given gateway 192.168.0.1 was already the default gateway. Why do I need to add another gateway to the routing table to make it work? I have similar installations and specifing one default gateway did the work so far. Thanks, Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 17:14:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4896216A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:14:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from user0@tkgeomap.org) Received: from eastrmmtao102.cox.net (eastrmmtao102.cox.net [68.230.240.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14C313C448 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:14:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from user0@tkgeomap.org) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080120165914.EEQU20005.eastrmmtao106.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:59:14 -0500 Received: from localhost.my.domain ([68.97.41.207]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id fUyW1Y00S4UAjD80000000; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:58:31 -0500 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0KGxWfd021243 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:59:33 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from user0@tkgeomap.org) Received: (from tkgeomap@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m0KGxW7b021242 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:59:32 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from user0@tkgeomap.org) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: tkgeomap set sender to user0@tkgeomap.org using -f Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:59:32 -0600 From: Gordon work To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080120165932.GA21170@localhost.ok.cox.net> References: <47928642.2090707@gmail.com> <20080120160405.E14916@delplex.bde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080120160405.E14916@delplex.bde.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: Realtek 8111B LAN Chipset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:14:28 -0000 > >However it seems many > >of the popular motherboards have Realtek ALC888 as built-in audio and > >Realtek 8111B as built-in LAN. > >I read at: > > > >http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/CURRENT/hardware/i386/article.html > > > >that the sound should work but I couldn't find any info on the LAN. > >Does anyone on the list have any experience with it? > > > >By the way, I'm going to run FreeBSD 7. > The RealTek LAN works fine on my box. Audio from Realtek ALC883 also works, but I would not know about ALC888. tkgeomap502$ uname -a FreeBSD localhost 7.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 7.0-BETA3 #5: Fri Dec 21 22:03:40 CST 2007 root@localhost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM amd64 tkgeomap503$ dmesg | grep -i realtek re0: port 0xdc00-0xdcff mem 0xfdaff000-0xfdafffff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci2 pcm0: Note that I'm on U.S. cable internet, so I'm not too worried about network performance. This is on Asus M2A-VM HDMI motherboard (AMD 690G chipset). Everything works, although ACPI appears to be inaccessible. Cheers, Gordon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 17:20:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6103E16A46C for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC3313C468 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:20:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so430072anc.13 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:20:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.165.13 with SMTP id n13mr12582550ane.38.1200849643898; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:20:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.102.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y56sm5728088hsb.1.2008.01.20.09.20.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:20:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from dogmatix (dogmatix [192.168.17.31]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4674B1140C for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:14:32 +0400 (GST) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:20:26 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080120142042.GA8576@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: <20080120211904.D91357@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> References: <20080120161831.L62033@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080120142042.GA8576@slackbox.xs4all.nl> X-Blog: http://rakhesh.com/ X-Notes: http://rakhesh.net/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Subject: Re: Fixing a USB disk to a specific device name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:20:45 -0000 >> What I'd like to know is whether there's any way for me to ensure that the >> da0 disk always appears as da0. I don't want it that tomm I plug in another >> disk (or change the order of disks, though I'll be more careful with that) >> and suddenly da0 is no longer at da0! That would hamper the boot process >> ... not nice. > > It is possible, but not as daX. Use the glabel(8) utility to label your > disks. They will show up as /dev/label/ > > The daX devices are created as the device is plugged in, so AFAIK it's > impossible to permanently assign them a certain daX device. Awesome! That should do. :) I spent the better half of my day here searching the net for a possible solution! If only I had asked this list first ... Thanks, - Rakhesh http://rakhesh.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 17:25:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E1A16A41A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775E613C46E for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so430389anc.13 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:25:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.206.11 with SMTP id d11mr12528330ang.88.1200849942645; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:25:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.102.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l31sm5661699hsa.0.2008.01.20.09.25.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:25:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from dogmatix (dogmatix [192.168.17.31]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E738F1140C for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:19:41 +0400 (GST) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:25:36 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080120212048.J91357@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> X-Blog: http://rakhesh.com/ X-Notes: http://rakhesh.net/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Subject: GELI key from a USB disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:25:43 -0000 Hi, I thought this should be easy but its not working ... :( I have a USB disk /dev/da0. That's got a GELI key. I also have an external hard-disk with partitions /dev/da1s1[a-f]. All GELI encrypted. What I want is that while booting up these encrypted partitions are loaded. And their key taken from the da0 USB disk. I tried the obvious like mounting the USB disk in /etc/fstab and giving it a lower pass no. than the encrypted partitions. But turns out that doesn't work. FreeBSD tries to attach the GELI partitions before mounting local filesystems! Any way to delay this step till after the USB disk is mounted and the key available? Or any other suggestions? Thanks, - Rakhesh http://rakhesh.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 17:47:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FBD416A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:47:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from smtp1.bethere.co.uk (smtp1.betherenow.co.uk [87.194.0.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F46413C4D1 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:47:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from [192.168.1.71] (87-194-3-32.bethere.co.uk [87.194.3.32]) by smtp1.bethere.co.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 897AA9807D for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:47:48 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <47938944.7000501@onetel.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:47:48 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071228) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47924869.2000909@onetel.com> <877ii5fsh0.fsf@chateau.d.lf> <47928A73.2040904@onetel.com> <4792CAE2.7070805@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4792CAE2.7070805@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: localhost in sudoers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:47:50 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Chris Whitehouse wrote: > >> I'm not sure what you mean. This computer is on a local network behind a >> nat box and doesn't have a dns entry. >> >> %host 192.168.1.71 >> 71.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer eco.config. >> %host localhost >> localhost has address 127.0.0.1 >> >> I think my question really is why doesn't sudoers recognise localhost or >> 127.0.0.1? > > Confusion between the IPv6ish ::1 rather than the IPv4ish 127.0.0.1 > perhaps? You can just put the hostname of your machine in the sudoers > file and sudo will query the IP addresses of its interfaces at runtime This pointed me in the right direction. I had put my hostname against 127.0.0.1 in /etc/hosts while messing around with trying to get it to work and forgot to take it out again - so when I put the hostname in sudoers it didn't work. Thanks Chris > - -- or simply don't use the host based limiting stuff at all: that syntax is > predicated on having the same sudoers file distributed over a number > of machines, which is great for a large site with dozens of servers, > but for a home user it's possibly easier to maintain an individual > sudoers file on each machine you have. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > - -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > Kent, CT11 9PW > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFHksri8Mjk52CukIwRCPfHAJ9m98pQb76ID8leqKRhyHKrzmJnFwCfaVXA > n1hIg4OKpiursIKyu12ICE8= > =jGzw > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 17:50:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8106616A468 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:50:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from smtp1.bethere.co.uk (smtp1.betherenow.co.uk [87.194.0.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B2613C455 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:50:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from [192.168.1.71] (87-194-3-32.bethere.co.uk [87.194.3.32]) by smtp1.bethere.co.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id 99322980D6 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:50:41 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <479389F1.50207@onetel.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:50:41 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071228) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47924869.2000909@onetel.com> <877ii5fsh0.fsf@chateau.d.lf> <47928A73.2040904@onetel.com> <87tzl97z0y.fsf@chateau.d.lf> <87lk6l7xxo.fsf@chateau.d.lf> In-Reply-To: <87lk6l7xxo.fsf@chateau.d.lf> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: localhost in sudoers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:50:42 -0000 Ashish Shukla आशीष शà¥à¤•à¥à¤² wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:40:35 +0000, Chris Whitehouse said: > > Chris> I think my question really is why doesn't sudoers recognise localhost > Chris> or 127.0.0.1? > > And, BtW, while enumerating network interfaces, it skips those > interfaces which're DOWN or LOOPBACK. If you've more questions, the > quickest way is to checkout source code :) . Well once you had put the code snippet in front of me I was just about able to follow it but unfortunately my coding skills are just about zero, so thanks to all the people who answer questions on this list. Chris > > HTH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 18:01:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E2616A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:01:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SK=d329cc7e@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4783413C442 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:01:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SK=d329cc7e@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643AED05A4 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:01:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:01:20 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080120180120.6cc96f9a@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801200713k3fdda593m4da8c93b23feaa0d@mail.gmail.com> References: <94136a2c0801191142r51a7715by99e56ee658621e5d@mail.gmail.com> <20080120000048.0cee1189@gumby.homeunix.com.> <94136a2c0801200713k3fdda593m4da8c93b23feaa0d@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 6.2-Release to 6.3-Release and automatically merge changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:01:27 -0000 On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:13:26 +0100 "Zbigniew Szalbot" wrote: > Which lines should I delete and which leave intact? > This one here is short but there are some other where the changes > apply to quite a few lines. I have trouble finding out how to "accept > the new versions"? I've not used freebsd-update.sh, I assumed it was just calling mergemaster. Does it really not give you option of accepting a whole file? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 18:02:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D0F16A418 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [202.89.146.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CC113C447 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:02:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 72840284E7; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:02:03 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:02:03 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Nicolas Letellier Message-ID: <20080120180203.GA14290@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <47910EC7.1030507@nicoelro.net> <20080118225807.GA87703@osiris.chen.org.nz> <4791F526.4030305@nicoelro.net> <20080119190325.GB99909@osiris.chen.org.nz> <47924D0F.3030607@nicoelro.net> <20080120060608.GB6299@osiris.chen.org.nz> <47931A6C.8040309@nicoelro.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <47931A6C.8040309@nicoelro.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Eclipse and FreeBSD7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:02:10 -0000 On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 10:54:52AM +0100, Nicolas Letellier wrote: > Jonathan Chen wrote: > >On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 08:18:39PM +0100, Nicolas Letellier wrote: > > > >>Jonathan Chen a écrit : > >> > >>>On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 02:03:34PM +0100, Nicolas Letellier wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>Hello, > >>>> > >>>>How build the native jdk ? > >>>> > >>>> > >>>Install the diablo-jdk, > >>> > >>> # cd /usr/ports/java/jdk15 > >>> # make install clean > >>> > >>>Then pkg_delete the diablo-jdk. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>Why must I install diablo-jdk and after delete it? > >> > > > >If you don't, javavmwrapper in /usr/local/bin will pick up the diablo-jdk > >when you invoke java instead of the native-version. > > > So : > portinstall diablo-jdk15 > portinstall jdk15 > pkg_delete diablo-jdk15 > portinstall eclipse > > is that all ? That should work. Go ahead and give it a go. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "A person should be able to do a small bit of everything, specialisation is for insects" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 18:12:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1EB16A417 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:12:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D0613C461 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:12:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so1651538rvb.43 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:12:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=olKwzuZBtaX4L1Fx33X718pnQnpBCGClP51GNCl2MC8=; b=kckWSHhXaBmTtYB7OZdrpz4Vbqf34prHaoskbk5d0QH/QVGvyCFH6wzYu3BMjMIbB1Lba/XhUsdtmZ0p67PkEwSjI3MrbK8n51+KvrMshMf56+RiicW3CVseQWZ+U3KvE9dccLHlXz0QpKWsjvC99KPe02ck+yi8dxdUQXMAJDg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=w7JpT3HaUGbdlU9l28BH+HAXgtYD9FBZ1ZAqexlw37Dkq+/CSvgOMa3uaLYZo5ktBjMRQp6iFjaTNFV3/WpMHDWxcT+JrdF5Cb9dgLMu+vFf1BQil0wlmonFtt9VSIxaXgQNOE0R0nANbCiYk3KCC1yi/E4VHVQbblBV3m7VthY= Received: by 10.141.161.6 with SMTP id n6mr3907605rvo.155.1200852753485; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:12:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.141.7 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:12:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:12:33 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Celso Viana" In-Reply-To: <2b6bd2cc0801200216m1a604c1co9f780ba218f7a747@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2b6bd2cc0801191727v6cfcd2c5scf5f7bb68abc0a89@mail.gmail.com> <2b6bd2cc0801200216m1a604c1co9f780ba218f7a747@mail.gmail.com> Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: Failing to compile kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:12:34 -0000 On 20/01/2008, Celso Viana wrote: > 2008/1/20, illoai@gmail.com : > > On 19/01/2008, Celso Viana wrote: > > . . . > > > 1 error > > > *** Error code 2 > > > 1 error > > > *** Error code 2 > > > > > > ...What can be wrong? > > > > Did you compile with -j ? > > > > -- > > -- > > > > make -j4 bildkernel > You're going to have to recompile without -j for the error to appear meaningful, I'm afraid. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 18:27:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03CD16A41A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764C713C4D3 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:27:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so189763nfb.33 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:27:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=af3l2o4QI1jykql+VdTloI6WykDXMKhMPEFasN+0qf0=; b=Z4tSj22mA2Dr5Txf8160NvsGOdYoWwQCtfgEulmFTvHCA1tYz/Yz7m5fbzKk4AP2xHcJkOR9EwthsodJGDNCwOTcCFxbOQ4IFBvtQJz8wFkytlO2ZXxzWIz0RuEEGUBgGtqsJS3CU4X9ezr0TTS/zcHM6ajxpD5Itz8mgN9vDwA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hzMZKmlrbzpZWWSAV0Jf8D+as8FAlq8iq6seVA+UleYGy0j6ctbkDUD/tmHMAOV32OOklz9hBkUdI73nVhzVhFzYEpVhvmsLOmgj1Ou/IlIcPJPmtY26XBVtlBo9kWkNfowzt7o++g1VeDf7sgzmn90utUj9C8GiTgtwH4kvsAI= Received: by 10.78.83.15 with SMTP id g15mr8095019hub.6.1200853626772; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:27:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:27:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801201027o3a00a333w5c98d8192f2abea3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:27:06 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: RW In-Reply-To: <20080120180120.6cc96f9a@gumby.homeunix.com.> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <94136a2c0801191142r51a7715by99e56ee658621e5d@mail.gmail.com> <20080120000048.0cee1189@gumby.homeunix.com.> <94136a2c0801200713k3fdda593m4da8c93b23feaa0d@mail.gmail.com> <20080120180120.6cc96f9a@gumby.homeunix.com.> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.2-Release to 6.3-Release and automatically merge changes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:27:09 -0000 Hello, 2008/1/20, RW : > On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:13:26 +0100 > "Zbigniew Szalbot" wrote: > > > > Which lines should I delete and which leave intact? > > This one here is short but there are some other where the changes > > apply to quite a few lines. I have trouble finding out how to "accept > > the new versions"? > > I've not used freebsd-update.sh, I assumed it was just calling > mergemaster. Does it really not give you option of accepting a whole > file? No, it says (for example) The following file could not be merged automatically: /etc/defaults/periodic.conf Press Enter to edit this file in vi and resolve the conflicts manually... So I have the vi open but I wonder which lines to remove and which to leave? Thanks! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 18:29:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4CF16A419 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:29:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SK=d329cc7e@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A25BA13C457 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:29:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SK=d329cc7e@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCACFD05BF for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:29:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:29:31 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080120182931.58aba4d2@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20080120212048.J91357@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> References: <20080120212048.J91357@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: GELI key from a USB disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:29:38 -0000 On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:25:36 +0400 (GST) Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: > Hi, > > I thought this should be easy but its not working ... :( > > I have a USB disk /dev/da0. That's got a GELI key. I also have an > external hard-disk with partitions /dev/da1s1[a-f]. All GELI > encrypted. > > What I want is that while booting up these encrypted partitions are > loaded. And their key taken from the da0 USB disk. > > I tried the obvious like mounting the USB disk in /etc/fstab and > giving it a lower pass no. than the encrypted partitions. But turns > out that doesn't work. Pass number has nothing to do with mounting order, but ... >FreeBSD tries to attach the GELI partitions > before mounting local filesystems! It has to, you have to attach a geli encrypted device before mounting the .eli device. You probably need to write a script to do the attach, fsck and mount. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 17:53:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3FC616A46B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:53:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lucifer.tedeum@yahoo.com) Received: from web58409.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web58409.mail.re3.yahoo.com [68.142.236.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CBCD13C457 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:53:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lucifer.tedeum@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 74653 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Jan 2008 17:26:22 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=jqrWv/DMXJ/Wk4ne+q0MSUChLrRcSj8WE2OhfktpC7YA96avi5RWTXr4Tx8O7veTKCS4PVC031J4YF+0vQouEggrLlFCDCBGm3ua+FNS/YcW+sW4SyqJDZFhEepie39crHHwxH25982KlQ074UPar1dN89usGD6jBtzxhPnMfUM=; X-YMail-OSG: tPKfTScVM1mgcROIhat588Bs95W43pHI.sFWJMHbFPtegAL_pcWnZpz1xBIfrumQRyLNC8zzFqZE1y3OpkB1n5JPeAyZAuCUQyZzw9gd9vAhRgRgyWCPahO64.mElmA- Received: from [202.123.224.38] by web58409.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:26:22 PST Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:26:22 -0800 (PST) From: vampire Ryan vandalism Vampire To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <562109.74034.qm@web58409.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:34:47 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Help From Indonesian....What's the matter with my mouse ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:53:04 -0000 dear sir/madam I love BSD OS, and when i know PcBSD, damn !! more cool and anything so simple... but i have one problem...after i installed PcBSD, sound and my keyboard everything's gonna be 0.k but my mouse's not working...just freeze on center of desktop. i want try and work in PcBSD soon, and i hope you give me the clue of it Thx for your time >From indonesia with secure by design -best regard- --------------------------------- Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 18:35:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F3716A419 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:35:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C045513C45A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:35:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0KIZPVt008187; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:35:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m0KIZPrt008184; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:35:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:35:25 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Jonathan Horne In-Reply-To: <200801200947.13279.freebsd08@dfwlp.com> Message-ID: <20080120113049.Y8014@wonkity.com> References: <200801200947.13279.freebsd08@dfwlp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:35:25 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: check processes started by inetd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:35:38 -0000 On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Jonathan Horne wrote: > how can i check to see the processes that have been started by inetd? i mean > other than reading the inetd.conf file... but something like top or something > that shows me the processes that are actually running? Kind of depends on what you're looking for, but ps ax, or enable inetd logging, or maybe sockstat. If you're new to FreeBSD, remember that inetd isn't enabled by default, and a lot of the daemons it's used to start on other systems can be run on their own. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 18:41:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E181C16A419 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:41:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82BD913C461 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:41:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0KIf1Fj002701; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:41:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DF5F7B82A; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:41:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:41:00 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Rakhesh Sasidharan Message-ID: <20080120184100.GA15880@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Rakhesh Sasidharan , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080120212048.J91357@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080120212048.J91357@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GELI key from a USB disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:41:04 -0000 --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:25:36PM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: > I thought this should be easy but its not working ... :( >=20 > I have a USB disk /dev/da0. That's got a GELI key. I also have an externa= l=20 > hard-disk with partitions /dev/da1s1[a-f]. All GELI encrypted. >=20 > What I want is that while booting up these encrypted partitions are loade= d.=20 > And their key taken from the da0 USB disk. >=20 > I tried the obvious like mounting the USB disk in /etc/fstab and giving i= t=20 > a lower pass no. than the encrypted partitions. But turns out that doesn'= t=20 > work. The pass number in /etc/fstab only affects the fsck order. > FreeBSD tries to attach the GELI partitions before mounting local=20 > filesystems! Any way to delay this step till after the USB disk is mounte= d=20 > and the key available? Or any other suggestions? It _must_ do so in case any local partitions are encrypted (like e.g my /home). What you can do is set the noauto flag for those filesystems, and mount them be hand, or write a script for it. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHk5W8EnfvsMMhpyURAr3wAJwKlygay7QgCVbzPf976uAzmDCz8wCfXCOm r7fEhXSqDmfr49tlrkjEkXc= =qW4t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 18:50:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACD016A419 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:50:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu (math051.cs.arizona.edu [150.135.82.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165B513C448 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:50:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from Debian-exim by smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JGfFi-0005Gj-QP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:50:44 -0700 Received: from 71-220-164-236.tcsn.qwest.net ([71.220.164.236] helo=[192.168.2.101]) by smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JGfFZ-0005GB-T9; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:50:34 -0700 Message-ID: <47939748.5080601@math.arizona.edu> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:47:36 -0700 From: Predrag Punosevac User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bruce Evans References: <47928642.2090707@gmail.com> <20080120160405.E14916@delplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20080120160405.E14916@delplex.bde.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Outgoing-Spam-Score: -3.9 (---) Cc: Greg Mars , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Realtek 8111B LAN Chipset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 18:50:45 -0000 Bruce Evans wrote: > On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Greg Mars wrote: > >> I'm buying parts for a computer and want to make sure that the core >> components are as freebsd friendly as possible. So far, I've decided >> on a core 2 quad q6600 and I'm choosing the motherboard now. > > Me2 (unless I wait for a newer generation of CPUs). > >> However it seems many of the popular motherboards have Realtek ALC888 >> as built-in audio and Realtek 8111B as built-in LAN. >> I read at: >> That audio didn't work with 6.2 Release and that LAN controller is very problematic. You are better of getting PCI/LAN on the garage sale. I like DLink and they go for $1 in U. S. and will solve your second problem as well. >> http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/CURRENT/hardware/i386/article.html >> >> that the sound should work but I couldn't find any info on the LAN. >> Does anyone on the list have any experience with it? >> >> By the way, I'm going to run FreeBSD 7. > > I also want a cheap PCI/e NIC that works well with drivers back to > FreeBSD-4 like my plain PCI bge and em NICs do. I doubt that any > popular motherboard will have anything better than a cheap PCI/e NIC. > > Bruce > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 19:00:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDEE16A418 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SK=d329cc7e@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EF313C447 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:00:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SK=d329cc7e@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0EEDD05B8 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 14:00:39 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:00:29 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080120190029.58c9e3b8@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <16143691-5D0B-4248-84BE-37FBDE40FEA5@mac.com> References: <70F64C4A-51CB-4301-B7C5-200FD8D5BC41@mac.com> <20080120002209.04e18225@gumby.homeunix.com> <16143691-5D0B-4248-84BE-37FBDE40FEA5@mac.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: portupgrade: the -P options rarely works X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:00:43 -0000 On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 09:49:29 +0100 Giorgio Valoti wrote: >=20 > On 20/gen/08, at 01:22, RW wrote: >=20 > > On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 23:35:42 +0100 > > Giorgio Valoti wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> I=E2=80=99ve noticed that using the -P option with portupgrade, which > >> should try to fetch the binary version of a package rarely works. > >> Most of the times it tries to fetch the package from the freebsd > >> site, it fails and then proceed to build it from the sources. > >> While I can expect from to time that a pre-compiled version of a > >> package to be unavailable, it surprises me to see this so many > >> times. > > > > Are you aware that you need to pick-up stable packages, rather than > > release packages, for portupgrade -P to work properly? >=20 > Well, no. What is the way to distinguish between stable and release? Packages are built per branch, but packages for release security branches are not generally updated. So if someone is using, say, 6.2 and wants updated packages, they set the PACKAGESITE variable to fetch 6-Stable packages instead. Try googling for the correct setting. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 19:14:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58CB716A419 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:14:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E07EF13C478 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:14:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so1315965fka.11 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:13:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=tpJVbBR3ntHD008S+rGjWRN+ECCtZmoPJ1aAiPLouHs=; b=WnBPOvd96BpoCo+FnlRxGx8A2gUduvBTDtePHA1GVRn+SGFKy0mfqgjmTGHbnybO0fIaYd11MSIjX8aRbirC1yRXHkUeTnLFELiNETwL7vb2hkA8PyrZ1U2qNwbjl4XufkEnEM40udEaWDfI9NMtthoeP+MexWbU6wFSDmCvLwc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=CbMEDP6k+wAOCVgIal/FMpejwZqblq3QmDxMpAdF+zCw8O5OB8y8TCdzDkV9aS7Lz9ckyHYzlMQnKYor6xkfggsu5zsG/ixpV9ECsW6WY3PMA6/I+FjEi+hmTpLtSYpqtefj1oNwyjIIozHlEVAI732rvXisftzoUrJvRUyLVo0= Received: by 10.82.108.9 with SMTP id g9mr10689182buc.34.1200856439142; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:13:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.108.2 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:13:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:13:59 +0100 From: "Colin Brace" Sender: colin.brace@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080120211904.D91357@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20080120161831.L62033@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080120142042.GA8576@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080120211904.D91357@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9d7a6737eb41dc80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Fixing a USB disk to a specific device name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:14:01 -0000 I use udev rules to do this. See: < http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/make-removable-usb-hdd-mount-at-fixed-mount-point-511917/ > -- Colin Brace Amsterdam http://lim.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 19:37:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E27516A421 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jin@george.lbl.gov) Received: from smtp119.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp119.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.64.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CFFD13C45B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jin@george.lbl.gov) Received: (qmail 4009 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2008 19:10:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.15?) (jinmtb@sbcglobal.net@76.199.107.118 with plain) by smtp119.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 20 Jan 2008 19:10:56 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: jn1bzngVM1mp_tIHLCeCkRyBcerLenaM5_dbFtnYKViHG8OPum_IQ4wRDDNkCru5Y5PiudzqLg-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <47939CBA.6090809@george.lbl.gov> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:10:50 -0800 From: "Jin Guojun [VFFS]" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061027 X-Accept-Language: en, zh, zh-CN MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Predrag Punosevac References: <4792C632.5010502@lbl.gov> <4792D7A1.6020903@math.arizona.edu> In-Reply-To: <4792D7A1.6020903@math.arizona.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Jim Guojun \[VFFS\]" , x11@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X -configure fails on 6.3-Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:37:37 -0000 Predrag Punosevac wrote: > Jim Guojun [VFFS] wrote: > >> After installed FreeBSD 6.3 on two machines, and X server cannot be >> started somehow on either one. >> >> Both "X -configure" and "X -probeonly" failed and errors are in >> attached file -- Xerr. >> Also, Xorg.o.log is attached. >> > > (EE) Failed to load module "ati" (module does not exist, 0) > (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0) > (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0) > (EE) Failed to load module "vga" (module does not exist, 0) > (EE) Failed to load module "mouse" (module does not exist, 0) > (EE) Failed to load module "kbd" (module does not exist, 0) > (EE) No drivers available. > > > How did you add Xorg? It looks like you are completely missing > drivers. Did you reboot the computers after the XOrg was added. > I did not add Xorg. From installation, I selected either 5 (X-Developer) or 7 (X-Kern-Developer). This is what older FreeBSD installation used to add X Window system. Is this an issue for 6.3 installation? I will try to add Xorg manually to see if this can fix the problem. -Jin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 19:50:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E885616A41B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:50:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu (math051.cs.arizona.edu [150.135.82.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91CD13C461 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:50:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from Debian-exim by smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JGgBA-0005LF-2i for questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:50:05 -0700 Received: from 71-220-164-236.tcsn.qwest.net ([71.220.164.236] helo=[192.168.2.101]) by smtp-gs.math.arizona.edu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JGgB5-0005Kh-Ad; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:49:59 -0700 Message-ID: <4793A534.7020705@math.arizona.edu> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:47:00 -0700 From: Predrag Punosevac User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jin Guojun [VFFS]" References: <4792C632.5010502@lbl.gov> <4792D7A1.6020903@math.arizona.edu> <47939CBA.6090809@george.lbl.gov> In-Reply-To: <47939CBA.6090809@george.lbl.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Outgoing-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----) Cc: "Jim Guojun \[VFFS\]" , x11@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X -configure fails on 6.3-Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:50:06 -0000 Jin Guojun [VFFS] wrote: > Predrag Punosevac wrote: > >> Jim Guojun [VFFS] wrote: >> >>> After installed FreeBSD 6.3 on two machines, and X server cannot be >>> started somehow on either one. >>> >>> Both "X -configure" and "X -probeonly" failed and errors are in >>> attached file -- Xerr. >>> Also, Xorg.o.log is attached. >>> >> >> (EE) Failed to load module "ati" (module does not exist, 0) >> (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0) >> (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0) >> (EE) Failed to load module "vga" (module does not exist, 0) >> (EE) Failed to load module "mouse" (module does not exist, 0) >> (EE) Failed to load module "kbd" (module does not exist, 0) >> (EE) No drivers available. >> >> >> How did you add Xorg? It looks like you are completely missing >> drivers. Did you reboot the computers after the XOrg was added. >> > I did not add Xorg. From installation, I selected either 5 > (X-Developer) or 7 (X-Kern-Developer). > This is what older FreeBSD installation used to add X Window system. > That should be enough. Did you create initial xorg.conf.new file with Xorg -configure? > Is this an issue for 6.3 installation? > I will try to add Xorg manually to see if this can fix the problem. > > -Jin I have no clue. I tried to play recently with 7.0 which is not as stable as 6.3. I wanted to use Miro. Xorg was properly installed and configured but it was crushing right after the start. The same machine is running OpenBSD 4.2 without any issues.I actually tried to start X even with VESA driver (normaly I would use i810) and very conservative options but aval:-(. It is 10 year old PIII. So nothing fancy. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 20:01:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD7716A418 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:01:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E8D13C474 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:01:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aquarius.dyndns.org (athedsl-284011.home.otenet.gr [85.73.157.9]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m0KK1RqT009985; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:01:28 +0200 Message-ID: <4793A896.3080604@otenet.gr> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:01:26 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jim Guojun [VFFS]" References: <4792C632.5010502@lbl.gov> In-Reply-To: <4792C632.5010502@lbl.gov> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: X -configure fails on 6.3-Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:01:31 -0000 Jim Guojun [VFFS] wrote: > After installed FreeBSD 6.3 on two machines, and X server cannot be > started somehow on either one. > > Both "X -configure" and "X -probeonly" failed and errors are in > attached file -- Xerr. > Also, Xorg.o.log is attached. > > Both machines run FreeBSD 6.2 and X works fine. > I search wiki.x.org and freebsd list, but did not see any information > related to this problem. > > Can someone tell me what is going wrong on my installation or X > configuration? > > Thanks, > -Jin > I rarely install X from packages during install myself (I most always compile the entire Xorg from ports afterwards). But wanting to test my CDs, I did, and got the exact same result. It seems that when installing the Standard distribution with X, several parts are not selected (like xorg-drivers, which is causing this exact symptom. You will also find out there is no "startx" command). Maybe the installation does not take into account that Xorg is now modular? However, when you reach the question about installing packages, you can actually select the entire xorg-7.3 package and install it. This will take care of the problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 20:32:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18AE16A41B; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:32:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noc@hdk5.net) Received: from guam10.hdk5.net (guam10.hdk5.net [66.180.132.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD18013C46A; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:32:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noc@hdk5.net) Received: from [192.168.1.29] (unknown [66.180.149.18]) by guam10.hdk5.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406865C22; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:34:55 -1000 (HST) Message-ID: <4793AFD2.40805@hdk5.net> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 10:32:18 -1000 From: NetOpsCenter User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.0.9) Gecko/20061211 FreeBSD/i386 SeaMonkey/1.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ticso@cicely.de References: <47928642.2090707@gmail.com> <4792A17E.9060208@hdk5.net> <4792B383.6010406@gmail.com> <20080120105540.GB22192@cicely12.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20080120105540.GB22192@cicely12.cicely.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Greg Mars , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Realtek 8111B LAN Chipset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: noc@hdk5.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:32:19 -0000 Bernd Walter wrote: > On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 09:35:47PM -0500, Greg Mars wrote: > >> NetOpsCenter wrote: >> >>> Greg Mars wrote: >>> >>>> I'm buying parts for a computer and want to make sure that the core >>>> components are as freebsd friendly as possible. So far, I've decided >>>> on a core 2 quad q6600 and I'm choosing the motherboard now. However >>>> it seems many of the popular motherboards have Realtek ALC888 as >>>> built-in audio and Realtek 8111B as built-in LAN. >>>> I read at: >>>> >>>> http://www.freebsd.org/relnotes/CURRENT/hardware/i386/article.html >>>> >>>> that the sound should work but I couldn't find any info on the LAN. >>>> Does anyone on the list have any experience with it? >>>> >>>> By the way, I'm going to run FreeBSD 7. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >>>> >>> Aloha, >>> >>> Realtek 8169 is a 1000 M and works on 7.* and 8.* I think 8111 maybe >>> old 100M ? Are you sure about the Realtek model #? >>> >>> >>> ~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740 >>> + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org + noc@hdk5.net + >>> + http://aloha50.net - Supporting - FreeBSD 6.* - 7.* + >>> "All that's really worth doing is what we do for others."- Lewis Carrol >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Hi, >> >> If you click on the motherboard specifications link below, you'll see >> where they list the LAN chipset as Realtek 8111B >> >> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813186133 >> >> This seems to be the page for the chip on Realtek's site: >> >> http://www.realtek.com.tw/products/productsView.aspx?Langid=1&PFid=5&Level=5&Conn=4&ProdID=11 >> > > Realtek has two devices for Gbit PCI: the 8169 and the reduced 8110. > They are both more or less the same - likely even the same chip inside, > but the later has pins reduced. > AFAIK the later can't have an external PHY, which you can't have anyway > if there is neither a connector or PHY itself connected on the board. > The 8168 is the successor for PCI express, with the 8111 being the new > reduced variant. > Both PCIe are detected but didn't run stable with our re(4), but it is > said that the latest driver fixes this and also adds a good speed > improvement. > > Thanks for the info Bernd, I have the 8169's running fine on 7.* and 8.* . I believe these have the new drivers. ~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740 + http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org + noc@hdk5.net + + http://aloha50.net - Supporting - FreeBSD 6.* - 7.* + "All that's really worth doing is what we do for others."- Lewis Carrol From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 20:48:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D5D16A418 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:48:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A193113C468 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:48:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so1335586fka.11 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:48:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=gsx5OTc6C6J6pDuZSo8mdLwFQZ/OHREMpESrHcSJ3Lg=; b=lCaeHFWNYgHg+7mEjqwltRpUoBL5UkU33vNVRCj7jYbd19az1qL6ChTXMu8ffKM6awv1NKMCyycOPoMx/902lE//ztZA8QWMX3HheUzCz++BABty+RyyNYVSBekk0CFTa2KUAtyV0aEOVNLooFEbezqYP75auSpZyoM7mfU6yvY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=YKQtfeFc8q8rEMbNdh4kWV9tcUVKYAGd9m23RqdWbOOOub6wcSEjoMxd/3d5mlpkTpgtVhH1BZKa6nK6WuUXIMr+DHo4VY3bEIjPJQTfnP2XMm4P90s3YSTb/r87goOQDfr20vthinXU8OuO2/l1qtGLA6p3KAcxK6yOIS+X1PQ= Received: by 10.82.106.14 with SMTP id e14mr10783763buc.38.1200860589859; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:23:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.108.2 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 12:23:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:23:09 +0100 From: "Colin Brace" Sender: colin.brace@gmail.com To: "vampire Ryan vandalism Vampire" In-Reply-To: <562109.74034.qm@web58409.mail.re3.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <562109.74034.qm@web58409.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9346b9ab164fc871 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help From Indonesian....What's the matter with my mouse ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 20:48:19 -0000 An issue like this is best posted in the appropriate pcbsd forum: http://forums.pcbsd.org/ with detailed information about your system and dmesg output. -- Colin Brace Amsterdam http://lim.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 22:04:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3C816A47D for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:04:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from javier_elizondo69@yahoo.com) Received: from web55113.mail.re4.yahoo.com (web55113.mail.re4.yahoo.com [206.190.58.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A30BD13C46B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:04:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from javier_elizondo69@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 9042 invoked by uid 60001); 20 Jan 2008 21:37:41 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=2dtLDJzw5EqEZMIY/WNt8Hek+0tQXIZqpGwZv11nrM28B/TQdbe+bwm/Li/A432ViUz9lNq0ogMfZYlUbjubmf7F2UiFzsbwm8Eho2644ZnFBufjyiYY66FC9KdWNQiy8EXZLeR1n+l1Rkwf0SidPQ3p+VkGgkmIHZ1OuqDYd/Q=; X-YMail-OSG: 9N3KpIwVM1kTtOmQ2zl9MIm8raFrTIpoKzVNrBNabdz4nwZrrNIpbPmCjdC4BncgDAZbA_meM.irLOZcdCbrWJcqlUjSx79jkX9p Received: from [75.111.128.168] by web55113.mail.re4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:37:41 PST Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 13:37:41 -0800 (PST) From: Javier Elizondo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <260705.8883.qm@web55113.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Subject: Problem in terminal, darwin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:04:22 -0000 Hi, I am using darwing in a mac book pro, when I open terminal I get the following message that appears only in my account, I would like to get help in order to fix it. Last login: Sun Jan 20 14:32:18 on ttys001 perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = "UTF-8" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). I have tried but without success. The languaje is EN_US with iso and the keyboard is in spanish, but not problem with it. thanks, Javier ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 22:04:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A79A16A4DA for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:04:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (www.unsane.co.uk [85.233.185.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77A213C474 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:04:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from [10.0.0.173] ([10.0.0.173]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m0KM35Fa000690 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:03:08 GMT (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <4793C56D.9050001@unsane.co.uk> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:04:29 +0000 From: Vince Hoffman User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (Windows/20071210) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Maness References: <479225B9.1030507@chrismaness.com> In-Reply-To: <479225B9.1030507@chrismaness.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dual Processor? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:04:47 -0000 Chris Maness wrote: > Is there a way to see if the system is utilizing both processors on a > two processor system? I seem to remember the top command in Linux > showed the load balance between the two processors (I could be wrong it > has been a while since I used it). Is there some ap that can display > these kinds of statistics? > You can see the idle statistics for each CPU by running top -S and see which cpu is running which process by looking at the C column (9th I think) Vince > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 22:15:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26C2E16A421; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:15:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from raven.bwct.de (raven.bwct.de [85.159.14.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA8A13C4E1; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:15:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de ([10.1.1.7]) by raven.bwct.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m0KMF71a088661; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:15:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [10.1.1.14]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m0KMErG8030458 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:14:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m0KMErxb025301; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:14:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id m0KMErHB025300; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:14:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:14:53 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: NetOpsCenter Message-ID: <20080120221452.GG22192@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <47928642.2090707@gmail.com> <4792A17E.9060208@hdk5.net> <4792B383.6010406@gmail.com> <20080120105540.GB22192@cicely12.cicely.de> <4793AFD2.40805@hdk5.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4793AFD2.40805@hdk5.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.4-STABLE alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on cicely12.cicely.de Cc: Greg Mars , freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org, ticso@cicely.de, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Realtek 8111B LAN Chipset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:15:10 -0000 On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 10:32:18AM -1000, NetOpsCenter wrote: > Bernd Walter wrote: > > > >Realtek has two devices for Gbit PCI: the 8169 and the reduced 8110. > >They are both more or less the same - likely even the same chip inside, > >but the later has pins reduced. > >AFAIK the later can't have an external PHY, which you can't have anyway > >if there is neither a connector or PHY itself connected on the board. > >The 8168 is the successor for PCI express, with the 8111 being the new > >reduced variant. > >Both PCIe are detected but didn't run stable with our re(4), but it is > >said that the latest driver fixes this and also adds a good speed > >improvement. > > > > > Thanks for the info Bernd, > > I have the 8169's running fine on 7.* and 8.* . I believe these have > the new drivers. The 8169 are not PCI express - they work stable since a very long time now, but the latest additions have some enhancements for them. One of the additions is seeable by issuing ifconfig, that is TSO4, which wasn't supported previously, but there were other speed enhancements as well. I've just looked into CVS and it was added in Rev 1.101 I don't know how much of it made it into 7.0. -- B.Walter http://www.bwct.de http://www.fizon.de bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de support@fizon.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 22:26:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F8C16A419 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:26:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de) Received: from mailgw11.fraunhofer.de (mailgw11.fraunhofer.de [153.96.1.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B9213C478 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:26:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de) Received: from mailgw11.fraunhofer.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw11.fraunhofer.de (8.13.5+/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m0KMQiHl006087; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:26:45 +0100 (MET) Received: from pluto.fokus.fraunhofer.de (pluto.fokus.fraunhofer.de [195.37.77.164]) by mailgw11.fraunhofer.de (8.13.5+/8.13.4) with ESMTP id m0KMQW3i005850 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:26:37 +0100 (MET) Received: from EXCHSRV.fokus.fraunhofer.de (bohr [10.147.9.231]) by pluto.fokus.fraunhofer.de (8.13.7/8.13.7) with SMTP id m0KMMKuN002972; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:22:20 +0100 (MET) Received: from rigel ([10.147.65.195]) by EXCHSRV.fokus.fraunhofer.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:22:20 +0100 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:22:19 +0100 From: Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (Joerg Schilling) To: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr Message-ID: <4793c99b.5tMB3s98WcE4EivT%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> References: <47927842.9laQQcD/42mYWXA0%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> <200801192231.46700.bob89@bobj.org> <47931f91.a8CsPAn0ysgEw5dM%Joerg.Schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> <20080120120229.GA42709@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: <20080120120229.GA42709@kobe.laptop> User-Agent: nail 11.22 3/20/05 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Jan 2008 22:22:20.0553 (UTC) FILETIME=[EC391790:01C85BB2] X-Fraunhofer-Email-Policy: accepted Cc: questions@freebsd.org, bob89@wb4jcm.org Subject: Re: Wrong times written by mkisofs? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:26:50 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >> mkisofs 2.01 (i386-unknown-freebsd6.2) > > > > This is nearly 4 years old, why don't you use a recent version? > > recent is 2.01.01a37 > > FWIW, > > 2.01 is the version available in the Ports tree as `sysutils/cdrtools'. > The 2.01.01a37 version is available too, as `cdrtools-devel'. But "stable" versions are dead versions because they don't change. Jörg -- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/old/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 22:59:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382C016A419 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:59:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomh@motorsport.com) Received: from montecarlo.motorsport.com (montecarlo.motorsport.com [64.235.98.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA1E13C455 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:59:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomh@motorsport.com) Received: from [172.16.172.8] (CPE000ded900fa2-CM001225449c2c.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.235.203.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by montecarlo.motorsport.com (8.12.10/8.12.3) with ESMTP id m0KMfAXn000575 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:41:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tomh@motorsport.com) Message-ID: <4793CE01.2020507@motorsport.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 17:41:05 -0500 From: Tom Haapanen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 7.0RC1 install to amr RAID array fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:59:20 -0000 OK, I'm stumped. We run an (almost) all-FreeBSD site, with the only exception being the MySQL server; it has been running Fedora due to the better Linux threading performance. I have been unhappy with both the management tools on Linux (not the same ...) and the reliability of the ext3 filesystem, so with the appearance of FreeBSD 7.0, I saw the opportunity to move back to FreeBSD for the database as well. The setup? * FreeBSD 7.0 RC1 amd64 * Dual Opteron 2216 (dual core) * 6 GB of memory * LSI Logic MegaRAID 320-2 * 4x 36GB SCSI in a RAID-5 array (plus two hot spares) Booting from a bootonly CD, the system happily starts sysinstall, and I can go through the installation steps, partitioning the primary and only disk (amrd0) and creating the filesystems. When I begin the commit step, the filesystem appears to get created correctly. However, once sysinstall begins downloading the packages using FTP, it fails to write them with a "unable to write data - file system full" error (the root file system was configured as 2 GB). Using the Alt+F4 emergency shell, I am able to cd to /bin, but little else. It does appear that the file system does exist, though. I have used the MegaRAID BIOS to ensure that the logical volume is consistent, and have re-initialized it, but with no difference. Unfortunately I'm doing the install on the console, not serial, so I have no dmesg log to share. I do recall using the amr driver with an HP NetRAID card with an earlier version of FreeBSD (possibly 5.x), but I can't remember whether it was the boot device, like it is here. Can anyone offer suggestions for wrestling down this problem? Thanks ... Tom Haapanen tomh@motorsport.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 20 23:14:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B1716A418 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:14:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hartmut.obst@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3401E13C4D9 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:14:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hartmut.obst@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2008 23:14:36 -0000 Received: from e180074072.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO ic.obst.local) [85.180.74.72] by mail.gmx.net (mp010) with SMTP; 21 Jan 2008 00:14:36 +0100 X-Authenticated: #20457454 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18DdD0Ua+wDQK+DLbVF6yok5T05e4dZBPhbBPIE/x j8N8Qf9Tmk6jT6 Message-ID: <4793D5DB.2090805@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:14:35 +0100 From: Hartmut Obst User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hartmut.obst@gmx.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenOffice.org Base: Java errors (libz.so.3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:14:38 -0000 There seems to be a workaround: http://de.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=85124 -- http://www.hartmut-obst.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 00:06:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FFFC16A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from authentec@gmail.com) Received: from ag-out-0708.google.com (ag-out-0708.google.com [72.14.246.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E32013C465 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from authentec@gmail.com) Received: by ag-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id 31so1232298aga.3 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:06:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=aDgfWlMZZfho/ninu0ci4cP3+JMwCzj/023y8cg3ocI=; b=Csh6bwIAbup/yoWk0cPXaQdOA7DpRbRZ5W8PUJShfSN1bwEse07ojaq1c7K1VSNi1nT3zjqWU96Cs49piHaO06S6R5r1h0ard3TGt81eHK5hCZL7qtyt+J5lPVkw8Kqkl9BS80puoPiEzasxXLVdNn8/iQP2SpFfN6oLa9eHVzY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wJISRpnLxfhlFaN5WOB+V2N0+hktbbgEHaeMrajLtkKOjvuFZCEqsFVCseYuu4uib97MgCa96auUPPGSOotH4ehrgnT3Kz8be3yUyyXG83HaIUweTPu1VHqvBTb0srfrRy3MHGEgKSRstVxEzUxVYQaimfQh6pMKuoXEU0IVPNs= Received: by 10.100.242.20 with SMTP id p20mr13325009anh.1.1200873976030; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:06:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from Samson.home.net ( [69.177.150.191]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s30sm10248542elf.3.2008.01.20.16.06.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:06:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4793E1F6.4060302@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:06:14 -0500 From: Greg Mars User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080104) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gordon work References: <47928642.2090707@gmail.com> <20080120160405.E14916@delplex.bde.org> <20080120165932.GA21170@localhost.ok.cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20080120165932.GA21170@localhost.ok.cox.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Realtek 8111B LAN Chipset X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:06:17 -0000 Gordon work wrote: > The RealTek LAN works fine on my box. Audio from Realtek ALC883 also works, > but I would not know about ALC888. > > tkgeomap502$ uname -a > FreeBSD localhost 7.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 7.0-BETA3 #5: Fri Dec 21 22:03:40 CST 2007 root@localhost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM amd64 > > tkgeomap503$ dmesg | grep -i realtek > re0: port 0xdc00-0xdcff mem 0xfdaff000-0xfdafffff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci2 > pcm0: > > Note that I'm on U.S. cable internet, so I'm not too worried about network > performance. > > This is on Asus M2A-VM HDMI motherboard (AMD 690G chipset). Everything works, > although ACPI appears to be inaccessible. > > Cheers, > Gordon > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Thanks. This is exactly what I wanted to know. I'll probably end up buying external sound and LAN cards anyway, but I'd rather the onboard devices work too. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 00:26:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15D316A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:26:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5EB513C4DB for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:26:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JGkUW-0005MZ-3m for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:26:20 -0800 Message-ID: <14989042.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:26:20 -0800 (PST) From: uutorok To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: worldhoho@gmail.com Subject: How to install KDE4 on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:26:20 -0000 I find that there is no KDE 4 in ports. The only instruction I get is http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title ... E4/FreeBSD But there is not much information. Anyone who know how to build KDE 4 on FreeBSD? -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-install-KDE4-on-FreeBSD--tp14989042p14989042.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 00:57:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6889E16A418 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jin@george.lbl.gov) Received: from smtp117.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp117.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.64.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6061E13C459 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jin@george.lbl.gov) Received: (qmail 13419 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2008 00:30:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.15?) (jinmtb@sbcglobal.net@76.199.107.118 with plain) by smtp117.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Jan 2008 00:30:48 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: JMnrZEAVM1kpfM0j2nhJXqXQnkxxqyLbjYn.iHby9eFddn19kose66RP62gTFBwprG0FFdyV1A-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4793E7B4.3060809@george.lbl.gov> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:30:44 -0800 From: "Jin Guojun [VFFS]" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061027 X-Accept-Language: en, zh, zh-CN MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manolis Kiagias References: <4792C632.5010502@lbl.gov> <4793A896.3080604@otenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <4793A896.3080604@otenet.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Jim Guojun \[VFFS\]" , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: X -configure fails on 6.3-Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:57:28 -0000 Manolis Kiagias wrote: > Jim Guojun [VFFS] wrote: > >> After installed FreeBSD 6.3 on two machines, and X server cannot be >> started somehow on either one. >> >> Both "X -configure" and "X -probeonly" failed and errors are in >> attached file -- Xerr. >> Also, Xorg.o.log is attached. >> >> Both machines run FreeBSD 6.2 and X works fine. >> I search wiki.x.org and freebsd list, but did not see any information >> related to this problem. >> >> Can someone tell me what is going wrong on my installation or X >> configuration? >> >> Thanks, >> -Jin >> > > I rarely install X from packages during install myself (I most always > compile the entire Xorg from ports afterwards). But wanting to test my > CDs, I did, and got the exact same result. It seems that when > installing the Standard distribution with X, several parts are not > selected (like xorg-drivers, which is causing this exact symptom. You > will also find out there is no "startx" command). Maybe the > installation does not take into account that Xorg is now modular? > However, when you reach the question about installing packages, you > can actually select the entire xorg-7.3 package and install it. This > will take care of the problem. This was not a problem of installation on FreeBSD 6.2 and earlier. It looks like a bug in 6.3 installation process. It does not matter how to select X package from the selection menu, the drivers are not installed. -Jin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 01:03:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C535216A468 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 01:03:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jin@george.lbl.gov) Received: from smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9737D13C447 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 01:03:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jin@george.lbl.gov) Received: (qmail 17282 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2008 00:36:21 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.2.15?) (jinmtb@sbcglobal.net@76.199.107.118 with plain) by smtp114.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Jan 2008 00:36:21 -0000 X-YMail-OSG: eTHtwxYVM1khTCweIDcdmq9I4FV5GUzxuEO6qXQWE_OOmqL6N72HoD7eIfbDHtKpXRUgUR1WEA-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4793E904.5020608@george.lbl.gov> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:36:20 -0800 From: "Jin Guojun [VFFS]" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061027 X-Accept-Language: en, zh, zh-CN MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Predrag Punosevac References: <4792C632.5010502@lbl.gov> <4792D7A1.6020903@math.arizona.edu> <47939CBA.6090809@george.lbl.gov> <4793A534.7020705@math.arizona.edu> In-Reply-To: <4793A534.7020705@math.arizona.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X -configure fails on 6.3-Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 01:03:02 -0000 Predrag Punosevac wrote: > Jin Guojun [VFFS] wrote: > >> Predrag Punosevac wrote: >> >>> Jim Guojun [VFFS] wrote: >>> >>>> After installed FreeBSD 6.3 on two machines, and X server cannot be >>>> started somehow on either one. >>>> >>>> Both "X -configure" and "X -probeonly" failed and errors are in >>>> attached file -- Xerr. >>>> Also, Xorg.o.log is attached. >>>> >>> >>> (EE) Failed to load module "ati" (module does not exist, 0) >>> (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0) >>> (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0) >>> (EE) Failed to load module "vga" (module does not exist, 0) >>> (EE) Failed to load module "mouse" (module does not exist, 0) >>> (EE) Failed to load module "kbd" (module does not exist, 0) >>> (EE) No drivers available. >>> >>> >>> How did you add Xorg? It looks like you are completely missing >>> drivers. Did you reboot the computers after the XOrg was added. >>> >> I did not add Xorg. From installation, I selected either 5 >> (X-Developer) or 7 (X-Kern-Developer). >> This is what older FreeBSD installation used to add X Window system. >> > That should be enough. Did you create initial xorg.conf.new file with > Xorg -configure? Nop, "X -configure" does not work due to missing many X related packages. >> Is this an issue for 6.3 installation? >> I will try to add Xorg manually to see if this can fix the problem. >> >> -Jin > > I have no clue. I tried to play recently with 7.0 which is not as > stable as 6.3. I wanted to use Miro. Xorg was properly installed and > configured but it was crushing right after the start. > The same machine is running OpenBSD 4.2 without any issues.I actually > tried to start X even with VESA driver > (normaly I would use i810) and very conservative options but aval:-(. > It is 10 year old PIII. So nothing fancy. Manually adding Xorg package resolves the problem -- it installs everything. So, the problem is likely a 6.3 installation bug, but I wonder no one else complained it :-( Thanks for help, -Jin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 03:05:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF26F16A418 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 03:05:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E47513C474 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 03:05:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so468200anc.13 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:05:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.172.17 with SMTP id u17mr13632486ane.27.1200884726300; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:05:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.102.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 52sm6169958hsf.17.2008.01.20.19.05.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 19:05:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from obelix (obelix [192.168.17.13]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1242711439 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:02:14 +0400 (GST) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:02:14 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@obelix.home.rakhesh.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080120184100.GA15880@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: <20080121070054.D3660@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> References: <20080120212048.J91357@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080120184100.GA15880@slackbox.xs4all.nl> X-Blog: http://rakhesh.com/ X-Notes: http://rakhesh.net/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Subject: Re: GELI key from a USB disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 03:05:28 -0000 >> I tried the obvious like mounting the USB disk in /etc/fstab and giving it >> a lower pass no. than the encrypted partitions. But turns out that doesn't >> work. > > The pass number in /etc/fstab only affects the fsck order. Thanks. I guess I'll have to write a script or something then ... Regards, - Rakhesh http://rakhesh.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 04:04:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E9E16A418 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:04:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@it.dk) Received: from dansknet.dk (smtp1.dansknet.dk [85.233.229.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02A7413C447 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:04:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coolzone@it.dk) Received: (qmail 21437 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2008 04:00:13 -0000 Received: from 85233228239.switch.dansknet.dk (HELO workp4) (85.233.228.239) by dansknet.dk with SMTP; 21 Jan 2008 04:00:13 -0000 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:36:16 +0100 From: Rico Secada To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20080121043616.d6321dcb.coolzone@it.dk> In-Reply-To: <14989042.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <14989042.post@talk.nabble.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.3.0beta5 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: How to install KDE4 on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:04:26 -0000 On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:26:20 -0800 (PST) uutorok wrote: > > I find that there is no KDE 4 in ports. The only instruction I get is > http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title ... E4/FreeBSD > > But there is not much information. Anyone who know how to build KDE > 4 on FreeBSD? Wait patiently until it reaches the ports, or build it manually from source. > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/How-to-install-KDE4-on-FreeBSD--tp14989042p14989042.html > Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 04:24:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158AD16A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:24:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg (smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B02DA13C4D5 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:24:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 4904 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2008 04:24:25 -0000 Received: from adsl181.dyn229.pacific.net.sg (HELO P2120.somewherefaraway.com) (oceanare@210.24.229.181) by smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg with ESMTPA; 21 Jan 2008 04:24:25 -0000 Message-ID: <47941E71.9070403@pacific.net.sg> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:24:17 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070826) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Davour References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Throttle the CPU when the system is idle X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:24:30 -0000 Hi, why don't you use powerd? Erich Andreas Davour wrote: > > I have toyed a bit with the dev.cpu.0.freq sysctl setting, and tried to > lower it automatically when the system load goes down. For some reason > it don't seem to work, even though the script works for simple debug > output. > > Anyone have tried to do something similar? > > /Andreas > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 05:02:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063BC16A418 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:02:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA50713C459 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:02:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so475089anc.13 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:02:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.71.16 with SMTP id y16mr13817916ank.50.1200891735231; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:02:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.102.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 30sm6254031hso.14.2008.01.20.21.02.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:02:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from obelix (obelix [192.168.17.13]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720311140C for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:56:32 +0400 (GST) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:56:32 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@obelix.home.rakhesh.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080120142042.GA8576@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Message-ID: <20080121085409.T1673@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> References: <20080120161831.L62033@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080120142042.GA8576@slackbox.xs4all.nl> X-Blog: http://rakhesh.com/ X-Notes: http://rakhesh.net/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Subject: Re: Fixing a USB disk to a specific device name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:02:22 -0000 >> What I'd like to know is whether there's any way for me to ensure that the >> da0 disk always appears as da0. I don't want it that tomm I plug in another >> disk (or change the order of disks, though I'll be more careful with that) >> and suddenly da0 is no longer at da0! That would hamper the boot process >> ... not nice. > > It is possible, but not as daX. Use the glabel(8) utility to label your > disks. They will show up as /dev/label/ > > The daX devices are created as the device is plugged in, so AFAIK it's > impossible to permanently assign them a certain daX device. Just mentioning this for archival purposes. If you are mounting a device as /dev/label/ at boot time, it will fail unless you add a ''geom_label_load="YES"'' to your /boot/loader.conf file. Had me stumped for a while. This loads the geom label module at boot time and so labels are recognized. Thanks, Rakhesh - Rakhesh http://rakhesh.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 05:05:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA1516A41A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:05:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D33213C457 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:05:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so475218anc.13 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:05:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.34.16 with SMTP id h16mr13737588anh.111.1200891906792; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:05:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.102.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s40sm6271396hsb.5.2008.01.20.21.05.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:05:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from obelix (obelix [192.168.17.13]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E96D1140C; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:59:30 +0400 (GST) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:59:30 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@obelix.home.rakhesh.com To: Colin Brace In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080121085901.R1673@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> References: <20080120161831.L62033@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080120142042.GA8576@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080120211904.D91357@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> X-Blog: http://rakhesh.com/ X-Notes: http://rakhesh.net/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fixing a USB disk to a specific device name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:05:08 -0000 Colin Brace wrote: > I use udev rules to do this. See: > > < > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/make-removable-usb-hdd-mount-at-fixed-mount-point-511917/ >> That doesn't work on FreeBSD, does it? Udev's a Linux thing last I heard of ... Regards, - Rakhesh http://rakhesh.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 06:25:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4839216A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:25:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E0613C442 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:25:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so250483nfb.33 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:25:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=tyhIDCe+tDnJsugXffVllBF+5yd2J+gQqyGFRcqEFyA=; b=VnJ4URaLbN7yEMeHGeesSoagBH0eVM3NB9dPwKJ6FyNdSl1T+HqRIg3t0ATcHr0Own4HhYe7zKrYb+IqeTAguAQdG+VpBES6a7W35XJZ/TDZHasV4breahymMBt1nZmka41jAHFZgtY8Cw8UQrwtTM9aWIJCxKvDqePvSAMtNcM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nOK702BlqhOfCLaFwf3/HoRsjwkXSQIrCZwtsB2RW6pN+uNLtScTV7dWm4wS9V58Bx0yAoxBl2fpf4ywKChFqNHAgFr2CFZQfVbrepcUP+6iaAK020n4sZWw/EMY+oNzXF85xps5V2i4YIZcFvhgRHDCO22ll01YU04O13xwBD8= Received: by 10.78.159.7 with SMTP id h7mr8432305hue.17.1200896752071; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:25:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:25:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801202225r47f424a7gfc3f3fbebffc9403@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:25:52 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: "Manolis Kiagias" In-Reply-To: <4791C177.6030304@otenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <94136a2c0801181417w395f7532w4761fc76388ed60@mail.gmail.com> <47912AE1.6000603@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801190114u46f872eas8f6afd5e52dd73b1@mail.gmail.com> <4791C177.6030304@otenet.gr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: going from 6.2 to 6.3 and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:25:54 -0000 Hello, > >> It will not update your kernel, but if you do freebsd-update install you > >> will get an updated GENERIC kernel in /boot/GENERIC. > >> > >> This is what I did: > >> > >> freebsd-update -r 6.3-RELEASE upgrade > >> > >> (got the warning you mentioned) > >> > >> freebsd-update install > >> > >> Got a message about installing kernel updates. Got a new generic kernel > >> in /boot/GENERIC (check to see this exists!) Yes, on the other machine there is no /boot/GENERIC So what do I do (I followed the steps you described). # locate GENERIC /usr/src/sys/alpha/conf/GENERIC /usr/src/sys/alpha/conf/GENERIC.hints /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC.hints /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC.hints /usr/src/sys/ia64/conf/GENERIC /usr/src/sys/ia64/conf/GENERIC.hints /usr/src/sys/pc98/conf/GENERIC /usr/src/sys/pc98/conf/GENERIC.hints /usr/src/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERIC /usr/src/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERIC.hints /usr/src/sys/sparc64/conf/GENERIC /usr/src/sys/sparc64/conf/GENERIC.hints Thanks! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 06:37:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE6D16A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:37:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.77]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35EB313C459 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:37:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aquarius.dyndns.org (athedsl-284011.home.otenet.gr [85.73.157.9]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m0L6bgHo020151; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:37:42 +0200 Message-ID: <47943DB6.7070301@otenet.gr> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:37:42 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zbigniew Szalbot References: <94136a2c0801181417w395f7532w4761fc76388ed60@mail.gmail.com> <47912AE1.6000603@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801190114u46f872eas8f6afd5e52dd73b1@mail.gmail.com> <4791C177.6030304@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801202225r47f424a7gfc3f3fbebffc9403@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801202225r47f424a7gfc3f3fbebffc9403@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: going from 6.2 to 6.3 and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:37:45 -0000 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Hello, > > >>>> It will not update your kernel, but if you do freebsd-update install you >>>> will get an updated GENERIC kernel in /boot/GENERIC. >>>> >>>> This is what I did: >>>> >>>> freebsd-update -r 6.3-RELEASE upgrade >>>> >>>> (got the warning you mentioned) >>>> >>>> freebsd-update install >>>> >>>> Got a message about installing kernel updates. Got a new generic kernel >>>> in /boot/GENERIC (check to see this exists!) >>>> > > Yes, on the other machine there is no /boot/GENERIC > So what do I do (I followed the steps you described). > > # locate GENERIC > /usr/src/sys/alpha/conf/GENERIC > /usr/src/sys/alpha/conf/GENERIC.hints > /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC > /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC.hints > /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC > /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC.hints > /usr/src/sys/ia64/conf/GENERIC > /usr/src/sys/ia64/conf/GENERIC.hints > /usr/src/sys/pc98/conf/GENERIC > /usr/src/sys/pc98/conf/GENERIC.hints > /usr/src/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERIC > /usr/src/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERIC.hints > /usr/src/sys/sparc64/conf/GENERIC > /usr/src/sys/sparc64/conf/GENERIC.hints > > > Thanks! > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > So, you actually run freebsd-update install? Running just the freebsd-update -r 6.3-RELEASE upgrade part will not install anything. You will have to run freebsd-update install, it will complain about not running a GENERIC kernel and install the new one in /boot/GENERIC. Although in my case I believe I already had a /boot/GENERIC kernel, and I think this was created by standard freebsd-update (i.e. when going from a -p# to another -p# while in 6.2) Could you please send the output of uname -a and ls -la /boot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 06:44:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB6816A418 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:44:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FCD813C461 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:44:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w8so1269911mue.4 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:44:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=3Cm4UuO/C8hJh8TIUf/HVMVE4v4k+wva0lzY4ZXHLGs=; b=rZDoU3jpT3WK/TVTDXlJg6Ja4vflELXK4QVOhyB4ANJnEfiA3wOFcaetiWmcYruBH9lvKxvA3jwWtJhOFA5IeKZg5qsxb2StmnnF19E1k4umR4ygOvC7suz3dHa4rmu+v18V8j9lnxDVNC+Pi5n191/BTwuJXiL5urf9dGcOrOE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hT/IR+sqKqQVBXkUGvqTfaoB9PiGbyKEpVF6RJDfYcxXisi+2Q8j6bzo70xi9E6n8bWOJSv3MCmEniIoB1jLkXsMRUMUKrDH7JBq50pGs3FvtykT4PeW32xlTE8Y1/voAM++PxgnrmF40KNPrYJCnwbSYw3uLsx1nzElQEqvois= Received: by 10.78.136.9 with SMTP id j9mr8404785hud.46.1200897846933; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:44:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:44:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801202244m524383fak5053d7204224f33f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:44:06 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: "Manolis Kiagias" In-Reply-To: <47943DB6.7070301@otenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <94136a2c0801181417w395f7532w4761fc76388ed60@mail.gmail.com> <47912AE1.6000603@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801190114u46f872eas8f6afd5e52dd73b1@mail.gmail.com> <4791C177.6030304@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801202225r47f424a7gfc3f3fbebffc9403@mail.gmail.com> <47943DB6.7070301@otenet.gr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: going from 6.2 to 6.3 and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:44:09 -0000 Hello, 2008/1/21, Manolis Kiagias : > Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > >>>> It will not update your kernel, but if you do freebsd-update install you > >>>> will get an updated GENERIC kernel in /boot/GENERIC. > >>>> > >>>> This is what I did: > >>>> > >>>> freebsd-update -r 6.3-RELEASE upgrade > >>>> > >>>> (got the warning you mentioned) > >>>> > >>>> freebsd-update install > >>>> > >>>> Got a message about installing kernel updates. Got a new generic kernel > >>>> in /boot/GENERIC (check to see this exists!) > >>>> > > > > Yes, on the other machine there is no /boot/GENERIC > > So what do I do (I followed the steps you described). > > > > # locate GENERIC > > /usr/src/sys/alpha/conf/GENERIC > > /usr/src/sys/alpha/conf/GENERIC.hints > > /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC > > /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC.hints > > /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC > > /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC.hints > > /usr/src/sys/ia64/conf/GENERIC > > /usr/src/sys/ia64/conf/GENERIC.hints > > /usr/src/sys/pc98/conf/GENERIC > > /usr/src/sys/pc98/conf/GENERIC.hints > > /usr/src/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERIC > > /usr/src/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERIC.hints > > /usr/src/sys/sparc64/conf/GENERIC > > /usr/src/sys/sparc64/conf/GENERIC.hints > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > > > > So, you actually run freebsd-update install? Yes, I did. sh freebsd-update.sh -f freebsd-update.conf install > Running just the freebsd-update -r 6.3-RELEASE upgrade part will not > install anything. You will have to run freebsd-update install, it will > complain about not running a GENERIC kernel and install the new one in > /boot/GENERIC. Although in my case I believe I already had a > /boot/GENERIC kernel, and I think this was created by standard > freebsd-update (i.e. when going from a -p# to another -p# while in 6.2) > > Could you please send the output of uname -a and ls -la /boot Here they go: FreeBSD domain.tld 6.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 #2: Wed Jul 4 13:29:40 CEST 2007 root@domain.tld:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LISTS i386 $ ls -la /boot total 836 drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512 Jan 21 07:21 . drwxr-xr-x 23 root wheel 512 Jan 19 18:06 .. -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7638 Jan 22 2007 beastie.4th -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 8192 Jan 21 07:21 boot -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 22 2007 boot0 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 21 07:21 boot0sio -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 22 2007 boot1 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7680 Jan 21 07:21 boot2 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1201 Jan 21 07:21 cdboot drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jan 21 07:21 defaults -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1741 May 7 2006 device.hints -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 2249 Jan 22 2007 frames.4th drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 9728 Jan 21 07:21 kernel.old -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 217088 Jan 21 07:21 loader -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7772 Jan 22 2007 loader.4th -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Sep 8 2006 loader.conf -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 15219 Jan 22 2007 loader.help -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 212992 May 7 2006 loader.old -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 389 May 7 2006 loader.rc -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 22 2007 mbr drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 7 2006 modules drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 9728 Jan 21 07:21 mykernel.old -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 219136 Jan 21 07:21 pxeboot -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 692 Jan 22 2007 screen.4th -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 36440 Jan 22 2007 support.4th Thank you! I can repeat upgrade/install procedure but will it help? Thanks! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 07:02:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC85816A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:02:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.77]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5247113C4DB for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:02:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aquarius.dyndns.org (athedsl-284011.home.otenet.gr [85.73.157.9]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m0L72Ve8000425; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:02:32 +0200 Message-ID: <47944387.5010801@otenet.gr> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:02:31 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zbigniew Szalbot References: <94136a2c0801181417w395f7532w4761fc76388ed60@mail.gmail.com> <47912AE1.6000603@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801190114u46f872eas8f6afd5e52dd73b1@mail.gmail.com> <4791C177.6030304@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801202225r47f424a7gfc3f3fbebffc9403@mail.gmail.com> <47943DB6.7070301@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801202244m524383fak5053d7204224f33f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801202244m524383fak5053d7204224f33f@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: going from 6.2 to 6.3 and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:02:34 -0000 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Here they go: > > FreeBSD domain.tld 6.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 #2: Wed Jul > 4 13:29:40 CEST 2007 root@domain.tld:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LISTS > i386 > > $ ls -la /boot > total 836 > drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512 Jan 21 07:21 . > drwxr-xr-x 23 root wheel 512 Jan 19 18:06 .. > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7638 Jan 22 2007 beastie.4th > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 8192 Jan 21 07:21 boot > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 22 2007 boot0 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 21 07:21 boot0sio > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 22 2007 boot1 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7680 Jan 21 07:21 boot2 > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1201 Jan 21 07:21 cdboot > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jan 21 07:21 defaults > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1741 May 7 2006 device.hints > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 2249 Jan 22 2007 frames.4th > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 9728 Jan 21 07:21 kernel.old > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 217088 Jan 21 07:21 loader > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7772 Jan 22 2007 loader.4th > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Sep 8 2006 loader.conf > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 15219 Jan 22 2007 loader.help > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 212992 May 7 2006 loader.old > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 389 May 7 2006 loader.rc > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 22 2007 mbr > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 7 2006 modules > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 9728 Jan 21 07:21 mykernel.old > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 219136 Jan 21 07:21 pxeboot > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 692 Jan 22 2007 screen.4th > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 36440 Jan 22 2007 support.4th > > Thank you! > > I can repeat upgrade/install procedure but will it help? > > Thanks! > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > > Problem is if you run freebsd-update install a second time, I believe it will install the rest of the system, as it has already installed the kernel. From your /boot/ directory I see no /kernel directory, I assume you moved it to mykernel.old However the /kernel.old directory has a today's date, while normally this is only changed when you recompile a new kernel. Is it possible there was a GENERIC kernel in there that was updated? I am just speculating here, but you could try the following: - Reboot - Escape to loader prompt - unload - load /boot/kernel.old/kernel - boot and see if uname -a shows a 6.3-RELEASE Before this, you may want to take a look at the dates of the files inside /boot/kernel.old to see if they are updated From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 07:11:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6147D16A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:11:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8A413C455 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:11:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so252179nfb.33 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:11:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=BsHIzjOYlqyQwC1E1YvNu3g7bEpK4DKAK/IqM98us04=; b=F17tEiwca6AsAB0r7NC9ycEITL5fmoG6kjfAsDa5JkjHiIdpuWZBRPESE9OLDZ6MDSKkqY5QmAOK2wQLHRsqxYGCSHL8srKUx8JAGEKqxjjY1VOm8bFGIECT0YNbAfAgUzla/w79oEs2Pct0zxLUY4v8PuUY1lETiAkzokJGPAE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ssPADhESBUW4QvIS+jJupVB6quikdeaqH16z6w6kLDH8YYrVofM4EKEDBELXq2VSiYszqXkgjYpOGU6Y6YHRsgZra+SgCapa2zcK+vlobEm5J7k7tw5uZS/A58yS5s4XOefWM7giqiH7s+qdnLFPRpOUHgqAeGMbsGd4f5p6030= Received: by 10.78.137.7 with SMTP id k7mr8389083hud.68.1200899472549; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:11:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:11:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801202311w1502dbc1o69b1c689168352e6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:11:12 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: "Manolis Kiagias" In-Reply-To: <47944387.5010801@otenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <94136a2c0801181417w395f7532w4761fc76388ed60@mail.gmail.com> <47912AE1.6000603@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801190114u46f872eas8f6afd5e52dd73b1@mail.gmail.com> <4791C177.6030304@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801202225r47f424a7gfc3f3fbebffc9403@mail.gmail.com> <47943DB6.7070301@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801202244m524383fak5053d7204224f33f@mail.gmail.com> <47944387.5010801@otenet.gr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: going from 6.2 to 6.3 and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:11:14 -0000 Hello again, 2008/1/21, Manolis Kiagias : > > > Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > > Here they go: > > > > FreeBSD domain.tld 6.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 #2: Wed Jul > > 4 13:29:40 CEST 2007 root@domain.tld:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LISTS > > i386 > > > > $ ls -la /boot > > total 836 > > drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512 Jan 21 07:21 . > > drwxr-xr-x 23 root wheel 512 Jan 19 18:06 .. > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7638 Jan 22 2007 beastie.4th > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 8192 Jan 21 07:21 boot > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 22 2007 boot0 > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 21 07:21 boot0sio > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 22 2007 boot1 > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7680 Jan 21 07:21 boot2 > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1201 Jan 21 07:21 cdboot > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jan 21 07:21 defaults > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1741 May 7 2006 device.hints > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 2249 Jan 22 2007 frames.4th > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 9728 Jan 21 07:21 kernel.old > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 217088 Jan 21 07:21 loader > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7772 Jan 22 2007 loader.4th > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Sep 8 2006 loader.conf > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 15219 Jan 22 2007 loader.help > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 212992 May 7 2006 loader.old > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 389 May 7 2006 loader.rc > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 22 2007 mbr > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 7 2006 modules > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 9728 Jan 21 07:21 mykernel.old > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 219136 Jan 21 07:21 pxeboot > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 692 Jan 22 2007 screen.4th > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 36440 Jan 22 2007 support.4th > > > > Thank you! > > > > I can repeat upgrade/install procedure but will it help? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > > > > > > Problem is if you run freebsd-update install a second time, I believe it > will install the rest of the system, as it has already installed the kernel. > From your /boot/ directory I see no /kernel directory, I assume you > moved it to mykernel.old Yes, I did. I was then going to copy GENRIC when it turned out there is none. > However the /kernel.old directory has a today's date, while normally > this is only changed when you recompile a new kernel. Is it possible > there was a GENERIC kernel in there that was updated? > I am just speculating here, but you could try the following: > > - Reboot > - Escape to loader prompt > - unload > - load /boot/kernel.old/kernel > - boot > > and see if uname -a shows a 6.3-RELEASE > > Before this, you may want to take a look at the dates of the files > inside /boot/kernel.old to see if they are updated I don't think they are updated. The date for all of them is Jul 4 2007 which is when I upgraded to 6.2 (I think or when I last compiled the kernel) $ ls -la /boot/kernel.old |less total 22958 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 9728 Jan 21 07:21 . drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512 Jan 21 07:21 .. -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 13163 Jul 4 2007 3dfx.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4948 Jul 4 2007 3dfx_linux.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 55673 Jul 4 2007 aac.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4427 Jul 4 2007 aac_linux.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 3296 Jul 4 2007 accf_data.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5868 Jul 4 2007 accf_http.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 369012 Jul 4 2007 acpi.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18136 Jul 4 2007 acpi_asus.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12062 Jul 4 2007 acpi_fujitsu.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15152 Jul 4 2007 acpi_ibm.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10558 Jul 4 2007 acpi_panasonic.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 6599 Jul 4 2007 acpi_sony.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12183 Jul 4 2007 acpi_toshiba.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 17119 Jul 4 2007 acpi_video.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 86198 Jul 4 2007 agp.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 25105 Jul 4 2007 aha.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18784 Jul 4 2007 ahb.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 139328 Jul 4 2007 ahc.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7787 Jul 4 2007 ahc_eisa.ko -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8541 Jul 4 2007 ahc_isa.ko What are my choices now? I cannot reboot as it won't run without a generic kernel. I cannot go back to 6.2 as I have already used install...? Thank you! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 07:27:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE81016A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (smtp5-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4A7B13C44B for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EECE83F615E; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:27:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from Llea.celt.neu (ron34-3-82-236-236-194.fbx.proxad.net [82.236.236.194]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7BE33F6190; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:27:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from Llea.celt.neu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Llea.celt.neu (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0L6RImQ002582; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:27:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) Received: (from michael@localhost) by Llea.celt.neu (8.14.1/8.13.8/Submit) id m0L6PEO2002521; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:25:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from michael.grunewald@laposte.net) X-Authentication-Warning: Llea.celt.neu: michael set sender to michael.grunewald@laposte.net using -f To: Javier Elizondo References: <260705.8883.qm@web55113.mail.re4.yahoo.com> From: michael.grunewald@laposte.net (=?iso-8859-15?Q?Micha=EBl_Gr=FCnewald?=) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:25:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <260705.8883.qm@web55113.mail.re4.yahoo.com> (Javier Elizondo's message of "Sun\, 20 Jan 2008 13\:37\:41 -0800 \(PST\)") Message-ID: <863asr7l11.fsf@Llea.celt.neu> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem in terminal, darwin X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:27:29 -0000 Javier Elizondo writes: > Last login: Sun Jan 20 14:32:18 on ttys001 > perl: warning: Setting locale failed. > perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: > LC_ALL =3D (unset), > LANG =3D "UTF-8" > are supported and installed on your system. > perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale > ("C"). Values for LANG have 3 parts, like does fr_FR.ISO8859-15, so you may try to set LANG to en_US.UTF-8 instead of UTF-8. --=20 Best wishes, Micha=EBl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 07:39:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F2C16A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:39:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F387A13C458 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:38:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aquarius.dyndns.org (athedsl-284011.home.otenet.gr [85.73.157.9]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m0L7cuAk003808; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:38:57 +0200 Message-ID: <47944C0F.3030407@otenet.gr> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:38:55 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zbigniew Szalbot References: <94136a2c0801181417w395f7532w4761fc76388ed60@mail.gmail.com> <47912AE1.6000603@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801190114u46f872eas8f6afd5e52dd73b1@mail.gmail.com> <4791C177.6030304@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801202225r47f424a7gfc3f3fbebffc9403@mail.gmail.com> <47943DB6.7070301@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801202244m524383fak5053d7204224f33f@mail.gmail.com> <47944387.5010801@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801202311w1502dbc1o69b1c689168352e6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801202311w1502dbc1o69b1c689168352e6@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: going from 6.2 to 6.3 and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:39:00 -0000 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Hello again, > > 2008/1/21, Manolis Kiagias : > >> Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: >> >>> Here they go: >>> >>> FreeBSD domain.tld 6.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 #2: Wed Jul >>> 4 13:29:40 CEST 2007 root@domain.tld:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LISTS >>> i386 >>> >>> $ ls -la /boot >>> total 836 >>> drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512 Jan 21 07:21 . >>> drwxr-xr-x 23 root wheel 512 Jan 19 18:06 .. >>> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7638 Jan 22 2007 beastie.4th >>> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 8192 Jan 21 07:21 boot >>> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 22 2007 boot0 >>> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 21 07:21 boot0sio >>> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 22 2007 boot1 >>> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7680 Jan 21 07:21 boot2 >>> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1201 Jan 21 07:21 cdboot >>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jan 21 07:21 defaults >>> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1741 May 7 2006 device.hints >>> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 2249 Jan 22 2007 frames.4th >>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 9728 Jan 21 07:21 kernel.old >>> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 217088 Jan 21 07:21 loader >>> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7772 Jan 22 2007 loader.4th >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Sep 8 2006 loader.conf >>> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 15219 Jan 22 2007 loader.help >>> -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 212992 May 7 2006 loader.old >>> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 389 May 7 2006 loader.rc >>> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 22 2007 mbr >>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 7 2006 modules >>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 9728 Jan 21 07:21 mykernel.old >>> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 219136 Jan 21 07:21 pxeboot >>> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 692 Jan 22 2007 screen.4th >>> -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 36440 Jan 22 2007 support.4th >>> >>> Thank you! >>> >>> I can repeat upgrade/install procedure but will it help? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Zbigniew Szalbot >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Problem is if you run freebsd-update install a second time, I believe it >> will install the rest of the system, as it has already installed the kernel. >> From your /boot/ directory I see no /kernel directory, I assume you >> moved it to mykernel.old >> > > Yes, I did. I was then going to copy GENRIC when it turned out there is none. > > >> However the /kernel.old directory has a today's date, while normally >> this is only changed when you recompile a new kernel. Is it possible >> there was a GENERIC kernel in there that was updated? >> I am just speculating here, but you could try the following: >> >> - Reboot >> - Escape to loader prompt >> - unload >> - load /boot/kernel.old/kernel >> - boot >> >> and see if uname -a shows a 6.3-RELEASE >> >> Before this, you may want to take a look at the dates of the files >> inside /boot/kernel.old to see if they are updated >> > > I don't think they are updated. The date for all of them is Jul 4 2007 > which is when I upgraded to 6.2 (I think or when I last compiled the > kernel) > > $ ls -la /boot/kernel.old |less > total 22958 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 9728 Jan 21 07:21 . > drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512 Jan 21 07:21 .. > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 13163 Jul 4 2007 3dfx.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4948 Jul 4 2007 3dfx_linux.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 55673 Jul 4 2007 aac.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4427 Jul 4 2007 aac_linux.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 3296 Jul 4 2007 accf_data.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5868 Jul 4 2007 accf_http.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 369012 Jul 4 2007 acpi.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18136 Jul 4 2007 acpi_asus.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12062 Jul 4 2007 acpi_fujitsu.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15152 Jul 4 2007 acpi_ibm.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10558 Jul 4 2007 acpi_panasonic.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 6599 Jul 4 2007 acpi_sony.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12183 Jul 4 2007 acpi_toshiba.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 17119 Jul 4 2007 acpi_video.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 86198 Jul 4 2007 agp.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 25105 Jul 4 2007 aha.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18784 Jul 4 2007 ahb.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 139328 Jul 4 2007 ahc.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7787 Jul 4 2007 ahc_eisa.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8541 Jul 4 2007 ahc_isa.ko > > What are my choices now? I cannot reboot as it won't run without a > generic kernel. I cannot go back to 6.2 as I have already used > install...? > > Thank you! > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > I just checked with all my systems, and I seem to have a GENERIC folder in all of them. Even on one that has been running the GENERIC kernel all along (a VMware machine). Weird. Anyway, to get you out of this awkward position, I am uploading a GENERIC 6.3 kernel to an FTP where you can download it to your machine, uncompress it, reboot and continue: - Copy the GENERIC.tar.gz to the boot folder. - Uncompress with tar xvzf GENERIC.tar.gz you will now have a GENERIC folder with a 6.3-RELEASE generic kernel. Continue like before, i.e.: - reboot - Escape to loader prompt - unload - load /boot/GENERIC/kernel - boot ... you know the rest I will send you the link by private email in a few moments. It is currently uploading. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 07:41:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C250416A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F65713C467 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so253553nfb.33 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:41:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=ZNm38P4dO2ZLI/55l2hOgsHPbYRSbUsRCKJKYwiT32A=; b=sQ3XkCwILSokXBSzvJ8TiVKEwF8dAhwxQtCCF8E+7dWzslyQvh/ANR7qJn5/QKpgbHe11TK5dTcEFBJdVfBSPpXUvy69zTch8sj6c2lI9wf48W2IjmYw6o0EVMjSTXIGc2ET4einFHb7a8EXlt8qkYwAte/mNy7kO3Lq+04Zm9k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=JeXPCaphPwsnmffEogh8i7xyn9MkWf6K2Kv6xk3eIvssSTY7mNVyUuFwpGEGiDlOJSFiLHzwAwWs4b3I/JULqxgz+/iwjUc1A89j6U5ekjttzt/OrQEM3Ld+8xk7ghOtbPYnxKJ2GNLhVLm0zoc8Vj8iaKIQ76Jllsj93uTs96c= Received: by 10.78.161.4 with SMTP id j4mr8440641hue.49.1200901265871; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:41:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 23:41:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801202341s45cb0b7i84946fae4b1933c9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:41:05 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: "Manolis Kiagias" In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801202311w1502dbc1o69b1c689168352e6@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <94136a2c0801181417w395f7532w4761fc76388ed60@mail.gmail.com> <47912AE1.6000603@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801190114u46f872eas8f6afd5e52dd73b1@mail.gmail.com> <4791C177.6030304@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801202225r47f424a7gfc3f3fbebffc9403@mail.gmail.com> <47943DB6.7070301@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801202244m524383fak5053d7204224f33f@mail.gmail.com> <47944387.5010801@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801202311w1502dbc1o69b1c689168352e6@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: going from 6.2 to 6.3 and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:41:07 -0000 One more thought... 2008/1/21, Zbigniew Szalbot : > Hello again, > > 2008/1/21, Manolis Kiagias : > > > > > > Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > > > Here they go: > > > > > > FreeBSD domain.tld 6.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p5 #2: Wed Jul > > > 4 13:29:40 CEST 2007 root@domain.tld:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LISTS > > > i386 > > > > > > $ ls -la /boot > > > total 836 > > > drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512 Jan 21 07:21 . > > > drwxr-xr-x 23 root wheel 512 Jan 19 18:06 .. > > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7638 Jan 22 2007 beastie.4th > > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 8192 Jan 21 07:21 boot > > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 22 2007 boot0 > > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 21 07:21 boot0sio > > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 22 2007 boot1 > > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7680 Jan 21 07:21 boot2 > > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1201 Jan 21 07:21 cdboot > > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Jan 21 07:21 defaults > > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1741 May 7 2006 device.hints > > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 2249 Jan 22 2007 frames.4th > > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 9728 Jan 21 07:21 kernel.old > > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 217088 Jan 21 07:21 loader > > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 7772 Jan 22 2007 loader.4th > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Sep 8 2006 loader.conf > > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 15219 Jan 22 2007 loader.help > > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 212992 May 7 2006 loader.old > > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 389 May 7 2006 loader.rc > > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 512 Jan 22 2007 mbr > > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 May 7 2006 modules > > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 9728 Jan 21 07:21 mykernel.old > > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 219136 Jan 21 07:21 pxeboot > > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 692 Jan 22 2007 screen.4th > > > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 36440 Jan 22 2007 support.4th > > > > > > Thank you! > > > > > > I can repeat upgrade/install procedure but will it help? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > > > > > > > > > > Problem is if you run freebsd-update install a second time, I believe it > > will install the rest of the system, as it has already installed the kernel. > > From your /boot/ directory I see no /kernel directory, I assume you > > moved it to mykernel.old > > Yes, I did. I was then going to copy GENRIC when it turned out there is none. > > > However the /kernel.old directory has a today's date, while normally > > this is only changed when you recompile a new kernel. Is it possible > > there was a GENERIC kernel in there that was updated? > > I am just speculating here, but you could try the following: > > > > - Reboot > > - Escape to loader prompt > > - unload > > - load /boot/kernel.old/kernel > > - boot > > > > and see if uname -a shows a 6.3-RELEASE > > > > Before this, you may want to take a look at the dates of the files > > inside /boot/kernel.old to see if they are updated > > I don't think they are updated. The date for all of them is Jul 4 2007 > which is when I upgraded to 6.2 (I think or when I last compiled the > kernel) > > $ ls -la /boot/kernel.old |less > total 22958 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 9728 Jan 21 07:21 . > drwxr-xr-x 6 root wheel 512 Jan 21 07:21 .. > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 13163 Jul 4 2007 3dfx.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4948 Jul 4 2007 3dfx_linux.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 55673 Jul 4 2007 aac.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4427 Jul 4 2007 aac_linux.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 3296 Jul 4 2007 accf_data.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5868 Jul 4 2007 accf_http.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 369012 Jul 4 2007 acpi.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18136 Jul 4 2007 acpi_asus.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12062 Jul 4 2007 acpi_fujitsu.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15152 Jul 4 2007 acpi_ibm.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 10558 Jul 4 2007 acpi_panasonic.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 6599 Jul 4 2007 acpi_sony.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12183 Jul 4 2007 acpi_toshiba.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 17119 Jul 4 2007 acpi_video.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 86198 Jul 4 2007 agp.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 25105 Jul 4 2007 aha.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18784 Jul 4 2007 ahb.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 139328 Jul 4 2007 ahc.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7787 Jul 4 2007 ahc_eisa.ko > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8541 Jul 4 2007 ahc_isa.ko > > What are my choices now? I cannot reboot as it won't run without a > generic kernel. I cannot go back to 6.2 as I have already used > install...? Would it matter that I did the upgrade procedure: sh freebsd-update.sh -f freebsd-update.conf -r 6.3-RELEASE upgrade serveral times? I had problems with system asking for file comparison, which I described here (and I wanted to have another look at them): http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2008-January/166804.html Could this be why I have no GENERIC kernel? Thanks! Zbigneiw Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 07:50:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E95416A41A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:50:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7827F13C43E for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:50:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aquarius.dyndns.org (athedsl-284011.home.otenet.gr [85.73.157.9]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m0L7o3IM017103; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:50:03 +0200 Message-ID: <47944EAA.4080804@otenet.gr> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:50:02 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zbigniew Szalbot References: <94136a2c0801181417w395f7532w4761fc76388ed60@mail.gmail.com> <47912AE1.6000603@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801190114u46f872eas8f6afd5e52dd73b1@mail.gmail.com> <4791C177.6030304@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801202225r47f424a7gfc3f3fbebffc9403@mail.gmail.com> <47943DB6.7070301@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801202244m524383fak5053d7204224f33f@mail.gmail.com> <47944387.5010801@otenet.gr> <94136a2c0801202311w1502dbc1o69b1c689168352e6@mail.gmail.com> <94136a2c0801202341s45cb0b7i84946fae4b1933c9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801202341s45cb0b7i84946fae4b1933c9@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: going from 6.2 to 6.3 and custom kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:50:06 -0000 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > > > Would it matter that I did the upgrade procedure: > sh freebsd-update.sh -f freebsd-update.conf -r 6.3-RELEASE upgrade > serveral times? > > I had problems with system asking for file comparison, which I > described here (and I wanted to have another look at them): > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2008-January/166804.html > > Could this be why I have no GENERIC kernel? > > Thanks! > > Zbigneiw Szalbot > > I doubt it, but can't really tell you. None of my systems asked any questions. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 08:24:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9437416A419 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:24:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lveax.m@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1D813C4D3 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:24:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lveax.m@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so484752anc.13 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:24:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=uTDKO73AVnKMlxRQMtdONjvHNs75Li1/k3CmLd1ztjc=; b=PIPXCcTRDD2Q5QfGrZQ3LYMVi9kPViP6rYvmma6Gmb5/0cI3uQ6g3rl8GNoqDMOvqQYdHM/XSjSf8Oi3zl8iulquo7W+jODAn5T1lO6xEGdTV66+IAtAUMewRQD3HPlL33FWrl7AxoIGclt8IV5Sj5n0ifF3ixVfECbwJH84E+I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=bvjwWxQAtFVw++5JRvBOAki5gsRf07wydCtRrZYP8xCes5WbfBQmZLGs6NbEXbeuglgpnjt+EbLo7KtqueneG7qj+JohLs7aLM0vuAnFMW/xMYX1a3LqFCxPHNalp+Vup4pD9b1o6JpX6F5o9teIoYiGAxIyu5UXbIQG6fejsgs= Received: by 10.100.123.4 with SMTP id v4mr14200662anc.14.1200903850455; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:24:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.32.1 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:24:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <576dcbc20801210024l325a0bfdo67cdcbbb41b03290@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:24:10 +0800 From: lveax To: freebsd-questions , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: can't launch inkscape in freebsd 7.0-rc1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:24:11 -0000 $ inkscape [Mon 4:16:03pm] Duplicate large block deallocation of 0x86a1000 Duplicate large block deallocation Emergency save activated! then i must use pkill -9 inkscape to kill it .. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 08:49:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC9FF16A41A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:49:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3251413C47E for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:49:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0L8jZ6h001781; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:45:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0L8jQiG001778; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:45:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:45:26 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Andreas Davour In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080121094451.N1777@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Throttle the CPU when the system is idle X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:49:49 -0000 > > I have toyed a bit with the dev.cpu.0.freq sysctl setting, and tried to lower > it automatically when the system load goes down. For some reason it don't > seem to work, even though the script works for simple debug output. > > Anyone have tried to do something similar? no but anyway - freebsd halts CPU when unused, even at full frequency it uses very little power wne unused. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 09:09:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AA416A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:09:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from viefep18-int.chello.at (viefep18-int.chello.at [213.46.255.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5D613C469 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:09:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from edge.upc.biz ([192.168.13.239]) by viefep18-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20080121090859.QFZH25266.viefep18-int.chello.at@edge.upc.biz> for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:08:59 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.103] ([80.99.119.201]) by edge.upc.biz with edge04 id fl6m1Y0204LoMH40100000; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:06:48 +0100 X-SourceIP: 80.99.119.201 Message-ID: <47946129.7090505@shopzeus.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:08:57 +0100 From: Laszlo Nagy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <47907D3F.7000207@shopzeus.com> In-Reply-To: <47907D3F.7000207@shopzeus.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: gnumeric fails to install, 6.3-PRERELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:09:01 -0000 Laszlo Nagy wrote: > Enviroment: > > cassiopeia# uname -a > FreeBSD cassiopeia.ronet 6.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.3-PRERELEASE #2: Tue > Jan 15 04:41:41 EST 2008 > root@cassiopeia.ronet:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CASSIOPEIA amd64 > cassiopeia# portsnap fetch > Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. > Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap2.FreeBSD.org... done. > Latest snapshot on server matches what we already have. > No updates needed. > cassiopeia# portsnap update > Ports tree is already up to date. > > The problem itself: > > "portupgrade -a" fails to install gnumeric. I tried to do this: > > cd /usr/ports/math/gnumeric > make distclean > make > make install > > It starts to install gnumeric and stops with this: > > gmake[4]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C/figures' > gmake[3]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C/figures' > gmake[3]: Entering directory > `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C' > gmake[4]: Entering directory > `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C' > gmake[4]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'. > /bin/sh ../../mkinstalldirs /usr/local/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C > for file in about-authors.xml about-history.xml about-license.xml > analysis-complexNumbers.xml analysis-goalseek.xml > analysis-overview.xml analysis-scenarios.xml analysis-simulation.xml > analysis-solver.xml analysis-statistical.xml appendix-glossary.xml > appendix-keybindings.xml bugs.xml compiling.xml > configuration-localization.xml configuration-overview.xml > configuration-plugins.xml configuration-preferences.xml > configuration-toolbars.xml data-commentNlink.xml data-delete.xml > data-entry-advanced.xml data-entry-external.xml data-entry.xml > data-format.xml data-generate.xml data-insert.xml data-modify.xml > data-filter.xml data-move-copy.xml data-overview.xml > data-selections.xml data-types.xml documenting.xml > extending-functions.xml extending-overview.xml extending-plugins.xml > extending-python.xml files-formats.xml files-email.xml > files-opening.xml files-overview.xml files-saving.xml > files-ssconvert.xml files-textopen.xml files-textsave.xml > getting-involved.xml graphics-drawings.xml graphics-images.xml > graphics-overview.xml graphics-plots.xml graphics-widgets.xml > gui-menus.xml gui-mouse.xml gui-other-elements.xml gui-overview.xml > gui-toolbars.xml installing.xml legal.xml manual-usage.xml > morehelp.xml printing.xml quick-start.xml welcome.xml workbooks.xml > worksheets.xml functions.xml gnumeric.xml; do \ > cp ./$file /usr/local/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C; \ > done > if test "figures"; then \ > /bin/sh ../../mkinstalldirs > /usr/local/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/figures; \ > for file in ./figures/*.png; do \ > basefile=`echo $file | sed -e 's,^.*/,,'`; \ > install -o root -g wheel -m 444 $file > /usr/local/share/gnome/help/gnumeric/C/figures/$basefile; \ > done \ > fi > test -z "/usr/local/man/man1" || /usr/local/bin/gmkdir -p > "/usr/local/man/man1" > install -o root -g wheel -m 444 'gnumeric.1' > '/usr/local/man/man1/gnumeric.1' > install -o root -g wheel -m 444 'ssconvert.1' > '/usr/local/man/man1/ssconvert.1' > install -o root -g wheel -m 444 'ssindex.1' > '/usr/local/man/man1/ssindex.1' > gmake install-data-hook > gmake[5]: Entering directory > `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C' > /bin/sh ../../mkinstalldirs /usr/local/share/omf/gnumeric > for file in gnumeric-C.omf; do \ > install -o root -g wheel -m 444 $file.out > /usr/local/share/omf/gnumeric/$file; \ > done > install: gnumeric-C.omf.out: No such file or directory > gmake[5]: *** [install-data-hook-omf] Error 71 > gmake[5]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C' > gmake[4]: *** [install-data-am] Error 2 > gmake[4]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C' > gmake[3]: *** [install-am] Error 2 > gmake[3]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C' > gmake[2]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C' > gmake[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc' > gmake: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/math/gnumeric. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/math/gnumeric. > > > Is this a known bug? Should I post a PR? Apparently knowbody knows the answer here. I'm going to wait for another day and then post a PR. Thanks, Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 09:54:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2235116A468 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:54:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gdakos@enovation.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970AF13C45B for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:54:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gdakos@enovation.gr) Received: from John (host3.ep-pc75.ondsl.gr [83.235.249.3]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with SMTP id m0L9GfdC008989 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:16:44 +0200 Message-ID: <000c01c85c0e$5a19b1b0$1e01c80a@John> From: "Enovation Technologies" To: Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:16:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:54:09 -0000 hello. i am newbie on freebsd and i have a problem with 2 nics i have 2 nics re0 and re1 on re0 i have installing this ip # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Thu Dec 6 15:26:31 2007 ifconfig_re0=3D"inet 10.200.1.37 netmask 255.255.255.0" defaultrouter=3D"10.200.1.1" hostname=3D"zeus.local" i want to install on re1 another ip 10.200.1.40 i configure with sysinstall my second nic , but when i restart my box i = have this message arp: 10.200.1.1 is on re0 but got reply from 00:50:7f:b0:a0:f8 on re1 my question is how to configure 2 nics with different ip on same box = in the same subnet. thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 10:01:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC42B16A41A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:01:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wundram@beenic.net) Received: from mail.beenic.net (mail.beenic.net [83.246.72.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88DC13C46E for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:01:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wundram@beenic.net) Received: from [192.168.1.32] (a89-182-79-192.net-htp.de [89.182.79.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.beenic.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D32BA44529 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:54:24 +0100 (CET) From: "Heiko Wundram (Beenic)" Organization: Beenic Networks GmbH To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:02:43 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <000c01c85c0e$5a19b1b0$1e01c80a@John> In-Reply-To: <000c01c85c0e$5a19b1b0$1e01c80a@John> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801211102.43661.wundram@beenic.net> Subject: Re: help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:01:49 -0000 Am Montag, 21. Januar 2008 10:16:40 schrieb Enovation Technologies: > my question is how to configure 2 nics with different ip on same box in > the same subnet. You know that this makes no sense? At least not in 99.99% of the cases? Maybe you can describe a little more clearly _why_ you want to do this, then somebody might be able to help you more appropriately than me helping you now. -- Heiko Wundram Product & Application Development From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 11:41:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B6E16A41A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:41:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin.laabs@mailbox.tu-dresden.de) Received: from mailout2.zih.tu-dresden.de (mailout2.zih.tu-dresden.de [141.30.67.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F7213C457 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:41:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin.laabs@mailbox.tu-dresden.de) Received: from rmc67-31.zih.tu-dresden.de ([141.30.67.31] helo=server-n) by mailout2.zih.tu-dresden.de with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JGv26-0006yy-TU for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:41:44 +0100 Received: from martin (p5B0EDB27.dip.t-dialin.net [91.14.219.39]) by server-n (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB7B100A08E for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:41:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:41:36 +0100 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" From: "Martin Laabs" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.25 (Linux) X-TUD-Virus-Scanned: mailout2.zih.tu-dresden.de Subject: update /dev files with slices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:41:46 -0000 Hi, I created a dvd with two slices a and b. (Don't ask for the reason - it is a test for my backup system) This slices are ufs formated and gbde encrypted. However - if I insert the DVD the device nodes acd0a and acd0b are not created automaticly. But if the DVD is inserted *before* boot this two nodes are there and stay even if I insert a "normal" DVD without slices. An other way to update the device nodes is to detach an attach the ata channel with atacontrol while the "sliced" DVD is beeing inserted. But this is not very smart. (In particular if there is i.e. a second device at this channel) A similar way it to reload the atapicam modul. In this case the cd0* device nodes are updated. The problems are the same as with atacontroll de-/attach. So I'am searching for a better way to tell the kernel/devfs to update the device node list of the atapi devices. Thank you, Martin L. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 12:31:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7113F16A418 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:31:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E346613C457 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:31:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0LCQngN002303; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:26:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0LCQgpL002300; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:26:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:26:42 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Martin Laabs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080121132614.N2201@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: update /dev files with slices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:31:08 -0000 > reason - it is a test for my backup system) > This slices are ufs formated and gbde encrypted. However - > if I insert the DVD the device nodes acd0a and acd0b are not FreeBSD doesn't know that you inserted DVD until you will read it From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 12:32:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9C716A419 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:32:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81ED813C4EF for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:32:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0LCSBLG002310; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:28:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0LCS7lF002307; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:28:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:28:07 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Enovation Technologies In-Reply-To: <000c01c85c0e$5a19b1b0$1e01c80a@John> Message-ID: <20080121132719.T2201@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <000c01c85c0e$5a19b1b0$1e01c80a@John> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: help X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:32:52 -0000 > on re0 i have installing this ip > > # -- sysinstall generated deltas -- # Thu Dec 6 15:26:31 2007 > ifconfig_re0="inet 10.200.1.37 netmask 255.255.255.0" > defaultrouter="10.200.1.1" > hostname="zeus.local" > > > i want to install on re1 another ip 10.200.1.40 it won't work this way, 2 cards on same subnet. what do you need - more speed that 100Mbit/s or what exactly From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 12:36:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E90616A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:36:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin.laabs@mailbox.tu-dresden.de) Received: from mailout2.zih.tu-dresden.de (mailout2.zih.tu-dresden.de [141.30.67.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8CF513C4EF for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:36:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin.laabs@mailbox.tu-dresden.de) Received: from rmc67-31.zih.tu-dresden.de ([141.30.67.31] helo=server-n) by mailout2.zih.tu-dresden.de with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JGvsh-00026p-Nc for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:36:05 +0100 Received: from martin (p5B0EDB27.dip.t-dialin.net [91.14.219.39]) by server-n (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525B8100A08E for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:36:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:36:02 +0100 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" From: "Martin Laabs" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20080121132614.N2201@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20080121132614.N2201@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.25 (Linux) X-TUD-Virus-Scanned: mailout2.zih.tu-dresden.de Subject: Re: update /dev files with slices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:36:07 -0000 On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:26:42 +0100, Wojciech Puchar = wrote: >> reason - it is a test for my backup system) >> This slices are ufs formated and gbde encrypted. However - >> if I insert the DVD the device nodes acd0a and acd0b are not > > FreeBSD doesn't know that you inserted DVD until you will read it Yes - you are right. I forgot to mention that I actually made a read access i.e. with 'dd if=3D/dev/acd0 of=3D/dev/null bs=3D2k' But this didn't solved the problem with the missing device nodes. Thank you, Martin L. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 12:42:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0639016A469 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:42:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C93613C4D5 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:42:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w8so1383995mue.4 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:42:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=ppJOtd5h4mfdAnzwxAuvHIp64N1SeipS/PVEASHLDHQ=; b=QMgoUV6XPOFJi0irRIdINFb/GJXe6k/1U+Pj1L+7X5avk+vJ7K59R1S+wumexd/kJFXnMxit1DkF/WHCDhy6wUHp+WGgikz6LhU5eXsfokxrPX1KpYx1H3baXbNDVlV9J7GscLG7UrJW2nlDjF3nsAldGad+Qj7oNlGZo3kU7lw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=bXm9VU8w+CEJDqjTDGFR8H0smFoAk8S6paK2iUlgE6vJBcjq8rGMPjiB9TldKE5+ce1+B1ggSBGFRB7oqmprJFYbtC7p22A3yslJjLrDx2m1zkUv+zBf0qA+ICuzZCOOJ7Gpyj+YP1e1HYxMHxfsCXL6r3b2b162xdBcM8ke52A= Received: by 10.78.179.12 with SMTP id b12mr8903879huf.34.1200919325158; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:42:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:42:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801210442q2ab2cbdbs6257c71b1a614296@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:42:05 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Manolis Kiagias Subject: boot problems / redirection unexpected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:42:07 -0000 hello, Trying to boot 6.3. There seems to be some problem with /etc/rc.subr it gives me some message about redirection unexpected. I am trying to copy this file form a back-up to /etc but when I do that it says: read-only file system. I should add that I am operating as root (could not go into multiuser). What are my options now? How do I make files in /etc writeable so that I can copy the file from backup? Many thanks! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 13:00:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF4316A421 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:00:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F2613C478 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:00:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aquarius.dyndns.org (athedsl-284011.home.otenet.gr [85.73.157.9]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m0LD04Wa000706 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:00:04 +0200 Message-ID: <47949754.4070307@otenet.gr> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:00:04 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <94136a2c0801210442q2ab2cbdbs6257c71b1a614296@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801210442q2ab2cbdbs6257c71b1a614296@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: boot problems / redirection unexpected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:00:07 -0000 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > hello, > > Trying to boot 6.3. There seems to be some problem with /etc/rc.subr > it gives me some message about redirection unexpected. I am trying to > copy this file form a back-up to /etc but when I do that it says: > read-only file system. > > I should add that I am operating as root (could not go into multiuser). > > What are my options now? How do I make files in /etc writeable so that > I can copy the file from backup? > > Many thanks! > > Zbigniew Szalbot > ______________________________________________ > So it seems your problems were far more than not getting a GENERIC kernel... I guess this is the machine where you merged the changes of the conf files? If you do have a backup, reboot into single user mode and do something like: mount -o rw / This will remount you root partition read-write and you will be able to copy the backup back. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 13:01:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A1B16A418 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8B813C469 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so282642nfb.33 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:01:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=pF9HAyqjmIIdVYaEerkVs4MpwU36hj/68X1PXGLe6N8=; b=suVH8VCNjiKz8PS94NA9Ms1es/ADMqs1NtPCE23y+iShAKtZIkcOz9GrtH9rdaIT0/87ptWKj+8KiNh/5eg4vIV8IUxsxeWhhsiVJ2i2uahP1YM7fMSeZn6x8RsF1iz/u3NQfLiPRwq/X9G0OQPuy4N7ITOj39HCdCBFZnXbngs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OTL1E0c5pgjIKR5Me6GDJTqesVhAax4g7RQ33D/gF6uU8p7OTxkMFLYg9wDcMsJxVe4OE3GkOU1kSNVR3JIkceb43i9H80uAWroFx1StrhscMe/sWqoK48/d83KZHM4lKo+evDbnHSpzPTze12W6NrjvgHJl7hQm0Fp3fAN8M4U= Received: by 10.78.133.2 with SMTP id g2mr8963568hud.26.1200920515340; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:01:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:01:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801210501j2da78478mef9d07b1ed6f1863@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:01:55 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: "Manolis Kiagias" In-Reply-To: <4794971E.6040200@otenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <94136a2c0801210442q2ab2cbdbs6257c71b1a614296@mail.gmail.com> <4794971E.6040200@otenet.gr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: boot problems / redirection unexpected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:01:58 -0000 Hello, 2008/1/21, Manolis Kiagias : > Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > > hello, > > > > Trying to boot 6.3. There seems to be some problem with /etc/rc.subr > > it gives me some message about redirection unexpected. I am trying to > > copy this file form a back-up to /etc but when I do that it says: > > read-only file system. > > > > I should add that I am operating as root (could not go into multiuser). > > > > What are my options now? How do I make files in /etc writeable so that > > I can copy the file from backup? > > > > Many thanks! > > > > Zbigniew Szalbot > > > > > So it seems your problems where far more than not getting a GENERIC > kernel... > I guess this is the machine where you merged the changes of the conf files? > > If you do have a backup, reboot into single user mode and do something like: > > mount -o rw / > > This will remount you root partition read-write and you will be able to > copy the backup back. Yes, thanks I was able to do that. However, there seem to be some other problems so I am right now looking at what mess I have and praying I can revert it somehow :) Thanks! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 13:10:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46D016A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:10:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) Received: from thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853DA13C447 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:10:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90D1213865F; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:48:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtps01.kuleuven.be (smtpshost01.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.74]) by thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E331386F0; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:48:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from kalimero.kotnet.org (kalimero.kotnet.org [10.4.16.222]) by smtps01.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BA531E702; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:48:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from kalimero.kotnet.org (kalimero.kotnet.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.kotnet.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0LCmUbE001619; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:48:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Tijl Coosemans To: Wojciech Puchar Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:48:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080121094451.N1777@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080121094451.N1777@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801211348.29679.tijl@ulyssis.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster Cc: Andreas Davour , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Throttle the CPU when the system is idle X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:10:07 -0000 On Monday 21 January 2008 09:45:26 Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> I have toyed a bit with the dev.cpu.0.freq sysctl setting, and tried >> to lower it automatically when the system load goes down. For some >> reason it don't seem to work, even though the script works for >> simple debug output. >> >> Anyone have tried to do something similar? > > no but anyway - freebsd halts CPU when unused, even at full frequency it > uses very little power wne unused. Throttling still made a huge difference on my systems. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 13:34:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0B716A473 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:34:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3DA13C469 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:34:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1008194wxd.7 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:34:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=uHa5kHyiHGSv0jKrf3mlgSswBX5VfF50FLjmwlJbnQc=; b=v492A8KVvy0nxBsMY5cHNbR/D4oavlD9GVhuDD8SE7P5ukeW8UhHIr0NhG/4Lv3+s5P3RsqUKvjKamplHQ141RjMYKecLY5zm7ICraHT/YoVyVYAgso4zOBqHY6TiKuje9enG1rnlg/1I9V3VGrc9/56LZ/o9H8eITEATkLZelg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=c45gAsOYzFcWGIIYCcZ1JkeONEE9ymZ6LrIoJ6XXq8GN8smQZImpcIdT5LZvrgqBcdnD35oEt7sozL9TKntWeQgB7s3TAr5BF49I683aIYSb5zXfpt1mVGXbfM9uudnnCoJzjHBBQubfTIz6Zj0/XJw2FMaLYa2ygOHiqsKz+U8= Received: by 10.151.12.1 with SMTP id p1mr2301550ybi.83.1200920935677; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:08:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.109.18 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:08:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:08:55 -0300 From: Agus To: freebsd-questions , "Jonathan Horne" In-Reply-To: <20080120113049.Y8014@wonkity.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <200801200947.13279.freebsd08@dfwlp.com> <20080120113049.Y8014@wonkity.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: check processes started by inetd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:34:14 -0000 2008/1/20, Warren Block : > > On Sun, 20 Jan 2008, Jonathan Horne wrote: > > > how can i check to see the processes that have been started by inetd? i > mean > > other than reading the inetd.conf file... but something like top or > something > > that shows me the processes that are actually running? > > Kind of depends on what you're looking for, but ps ax, or enable inetd > logging, or maybe sockstat. If you're new to FreeBSD, remember that > inetd isn't enabled by default, and a lot of the daemons it's used to > start on other systems can be run on their own. > > -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Try netstat. That way you will see which ports are listenning...Acording to that you will see if inetd is actually running..And as Warren says, it is disabled by default.... Cheers, Brahama From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 13:42:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C984516A46D for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:42:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85DC713C4F3 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:42:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id AAA12629 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:42:54 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:42:53 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Subject: ipfw(8) doc bug? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:42:57 -0000 I was just browsing various versions of ipfw(8) such as: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ipfw&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+6.3-stable&format=html and noticed that (and 6.3-RELEASE) manuals sport 'FreeBSD 7.0' footers, however the proper FreeBSD 7 manual includes the new 'ipfw nat' section, so is different in at least that respect. Worthy of a docs? or www? PR, or maybe just a transient release glitch? cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 15:23:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80AB116A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:23:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sdavtaker@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1D913C4CE for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:23:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sdavtaker@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so3038214pyb.10 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:23:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=YErncdu7EFHQKxFDOUBEHT5/eUkD2Lmv2BFSVcpHd74=; b=FXLBuNgJCJ7SRhHqNAfEJEAasrua05XEXKPu4Z4RAQkpLw2JLsUCn5YFn1s+Su9oh1lxH+OWoYCO6wUEx1yicLyaw3EMsopSN9cqBFsRe7s+MS9gOumKm9fBKb2U5p/rp00h/YeSM9sEWk3dGPWzqmnFcjrYjCB9YEC4VwaqnS4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=abynxhg/kNIBAf1SadmUZYsY6eVsGjBstwsb4ZbzxJWnex3LAW9jtfq5wW8bp1c8Mohg9u0ux+wySDpejDM9wJ8TSU7g4F4JkkD/83uy7DJdafc9udmXu/awrLG5JQp4pnwpmCvI2/RXDc0yzYhASnOhwfzbWDyAATfu3008tGY= Received: by 10.35.33.15 with SMTP id l15mr7959997pyj.61.1200927444822; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:57:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.70.20 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 06:57:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:57:24 -0300 From: "=?UTF-8?Q?Sd=C3=A4vtaker?=" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: RLT8139d drivers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:23:57 -0000 Hello. Im running FBSD 6.2release. I got an old RLT 8139 1/10m working in my ia32 pc, used it for long time and wanted to buy a second one for routing, couldnt find one of those, and bought a 10/100/1000 rlt8139d, FBSD is not detecting it, i was googling and found out that 8139c+ drivers are not compatible with the old drivers. Is there any way to make it work? Thanks for any help. Sdav From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 15:31:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C68816A420 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:31:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg (smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 72C6013C4CC for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:31:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 14624 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2008 15:30:59 -0000 Received: from adsl181.dyn229.pacific.net.sg (HELO P2120.somewherefaraway.com) (oceanare@210.24.229.181) by smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg with ESMTPA; 21 Jan 2008 15:30:59 -0000 Message-ID: <4794BAA9.7040609@pacific.net.sg> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:30:49 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070826) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Davour References: <47941E71.9070403@pacific.net.sg> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Throttle the CPU when the system is idle X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:31:03 -0000 Hi, Andreas Davour wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Erich Dollansky wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> why don't you use powerd? > > Now I know a reason. It made my whole computer freeze and C-ALT-DEL or > C-ALT-BS didn't even work. Maybe it's not that stable yet. I use it with the -v option without any problems. I do not start it while booting the machine but start it later after loggin on as root. This way I can always switch back and see how fast the CPU currently runs. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 15:34:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A4A16A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:34:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg (smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C2BA13C447 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:34:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 18460 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2008 15:34:50 -0000 Received: from adsl181.dyn229.pacific.net.sg (HELO P2120.somewherefaraway.com) (oceanare@210.24.229.181) by smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg with ESMTPA; 21 Jan 2008 15:34:49 -0000 Message-ID: <4794BB91.7070106@pacific.net.sg> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:34:41 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070826) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Davour References: <20080121094451.N1777@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Wojciech Puchar , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Throttle the CPU when the system is idle X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:34:53 -0000 Hi, Andreas Davour wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >>> >>> I have toyed a bit with the dev.cpu.0.freq sysctl setting, and tried >>> to lower it automatically when the system load goes down. For some >>> reason it don't seem to work, even though the script works for simple >>> debug output. >>> >>> Anyone have tried to do something similar? >> >> no but anyway - freebsd halts CPU when unused, even at full frequency >> it uses very little power wne unused. > > Really? Good to know. I was wondering if I could make this laptop of > mine a bit cooler, but then I guess not. I also believe that the CPU is actually halted when idle but using powerd brings the temperatures on my machine still down. As powerd can be adjusted in which interval it adjusts the CPU frequency, short tasks run actually at the minimum frequency if the CPU was idle. The negative side effect is, that a click takes some time before the machine really starts to react if the expected action results in more computing. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 15:46:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A83B16A41A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:46:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E61013C455 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:46:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0LFkck2012994; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:46:38 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m0LFkccw012991; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:46:38 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:46:38 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Laszlo Nagy In-Reply-To: <47946129.7090505@shopzeus.com> Message-ID: <20080121084310.W12972@wonkity.com> References: <47907D3F.7000207@shopzeus.com> <47946129.7090505@shopzeus.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:46:38 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gnumeric fails to install, 6.3-PRERELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:46:39 -0000 On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Laszlo Nagy wrote: >> >> "portupgrade -a" fails to install gnumeric. I tried to do this: >> >> cd /usr/ports/math/gnumeric >> make distclean >> make >> make install >> >> It starts to install gnumeric and stops with this: >> ... >> gmake install-data-hook >> gmake[5]: Entering directory >> `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C' >> /bin/sh ../../mkinstalldirs /usr/local/share/omf/gnumeric >> for file in gnumeric-C.omf; do \ >> install -o root -g wheel -m 444 $file.out >> /usr/local/share/omf/gnumeric/$file; \ >> done >> install: gnumeric-C.omf.out: No such file or directory >> gmake[5]: *** [install-data-hook-omf] Error 71 >> gmake[5]: Leaving directory >> `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C' >> gmake[4]: *** [install-data-am] Error 2 >> gmake[4]: Leaving directory >> `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C' >> gmake[3]: *** [install-am] Error 2 >> gmake[3]: Leaving directory >> `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C' >> gmake[2]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 >> gmake[2]: Leaving directory >> `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc/C' >> gmake[1]: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 >> gmake[1]: Leaving directory >> `/usr/ports/math/gnumeric/work/gnumeric-1.8.0/doc' >> gmake: *** [install-recursive] Error 1 >> *** Error code 2 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/math/gnumeric. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Stop in /usr/ports/math/gnumeric. Just tried here, installed without problems: FreeBSD speedy.wonkity.com 6.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.3-PRERELEASE #0: Tue Jan 1 14:16:24 MST 2008 root@speedy.wonkity.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SPEEDY i386 Ports tree updated with csup, GNOMEDB option enabled in the gnumeric config. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 15:59:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF6F16A418 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF2413C4E8 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-25-183.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.25.183]:54711 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JGz3u-0002Ar-67 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:59:51 +0100 Received: (qmail 51941 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2008 16:59:47 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2008 16:59:47 +0100 Received: (qmail 62354 invoked by uid 1001); 21 Jan 2008 16:59:47 +0100 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:59:47 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sd=E4vtaker?= Message-ID: <20080121155947.GA62290@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sd=E4vtaker?= , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Originating-IP: 83.253.25.183 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JGz3u-0002Ar-67. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1JGz3u-0002Ar-67 f2328864c2234f6f9a9d303896c4ed35 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RLT8139d drivers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:59:52 -0000 On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 11:57:24AM -0300, Sd=E4vtaker wrote: > Hello. > Im running FBSD 6.2release. > I got an old RLT 8139 1/10m working in my ia32 pc, used it for long > time and wanted to buy a second one for routing, couldnt find one of > those, and bought a 10/100/1000 rlt8139d, FBSD is not detecting it, i > was googling and found out that 8139c+ drivers are not compatible > with the old drivers. > Is there any way to make it work? > Thanks for any help. > Sdav The RTL8139D is a 10/100Mbit chip that is supported by the rl(4) driver and can be found on the majority of really cheap NICs these days, The RTL8169/8169S is a 10/100/1000Mbit chip that is supported by the re(4) = driver and is quite common on cheap gigabit-NICs. The RTL8139C+ (which is not the same as the RTL8139C or RTL8139D) is a 10/100M chip which is also supported by the re(4) driver. If FreeBSD cannot detect your NIC then you will have to send more information to help people figure out what exact hardware you have and what would be needed to make it work. The output of 'pciconf -lv' should be a good start. (Include the full output, not just the lines you think are important.) --=20 Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 16:03:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E143E16A418 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:03:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from cenn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com (cenn.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34F113C442 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:03:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from mail.tcbug.org (mail.tcbug.org [208.42.70.163]) by cenn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9528178; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:03:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from build64.tcbug.org (unknown [208.42.70.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tcbug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7457C214980F; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:03:43 -0600 (CST) From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:03:35 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080120212048.J91357@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080120184100.GA15880@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080121070054.D3660@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> In-Reply-To: <20080121070054.D3660@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart11438406.hZzQPrzkas"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200801211003.41984.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: Rakhesh Sasidharan Subject: Re: GELI key from a USB disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:03:45 -0000 --nextPart11438406.hZzQPrzkas Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Sunday 20 January 2008 09:02:14 pm Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: > >> I tried the obvious like mounting the USB disk in /etc/fstab and giving > >> it a lower pass no. than the encrypted partitions. But turns out that > >> doesn't work. > > > > The pass number in /etc/fstab only affects the fsck order. > > Thanks. I guess I'll have to write a script or something then ... > > Regards, > > - Rakhesh > http://rakhesh.net/ If you are using /etc/rc.d/geli or geli2 what about fiddling with it's REQU= IRE=20 so that it runs later.....like after all your filesystems are mounted? Thi= s=20 would seem to be an ok solution provided you aren't using geli on your OS=20 partitions. =2D-=20 Thanks, Josh Paetzel PGP: 8A48 EF36 5E9F 4EDA 5A8C 11B4 26F9 01F1 27AF AECB --nextPart11438406.hZzQPrzkas Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBHlMJdJvkB8SevrssRAgqGAKCPyQvjOb48TbnQtAgoS+qsOcI3pgCgkSEQ Ln1t30kSCnWuzqblAUOVHX4= =O5eg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart11438406.hZzQPrzkas-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 16:14:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0418C16A41B for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:14:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from mesiob.obspm.fr (mesiob.obspm.fr [145.238.2.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75EDE13C447 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:14:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from localhost (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) by mesiob.obspm.fr (8.13.4/8.13.4/SIO Observatoire de Paris) with ESMTP id m0LGETuw021549 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:14:29 +0100 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:14:29 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080121161429.GA22111@pcjas.obspm.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (mesiob.obspm.fr [145.238.2.2]); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:14:29 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.92, clamav-milter version 0.92 on mesiob.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: ZFS for production. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Albert.Shih@obspm.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:14:32 -0000 Hi all. I would like to known if the ZFS "can" be use in production ? Are there here anyone to use ZFS in production server ? Lots of thanks. Regards. NB: I'm going to use 7.0 in production, but for the FS it's more complexe, if I lost some connexion because the 7.0 freeze is very different if I lost all data. -- Albert SHIH Observatoire de Paris Meudon SIO batiment 15 Téléphone : 01 45 07 76 26 Heure local/Local time: Lun 21 jan 2008 17:12:24 CET From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 16:33:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0BA16A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:33:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D60913C458 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:33:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0LGTLcD003166; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:29:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0LGTFMd003163; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:29:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:29:15 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Albert Shih In-Reply-To: <20080121161429.GA22111@pcjas.obspm.fr> Message-ID: <20080121172813.K2974@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080121161429.GA22111@pcjas.obspm.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS for production. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:33:38 -0000 > > I would like to known if the ZFS "can" be use in production ? Are there of course can - as everything. what about the results... that's other questions. it WILL put a load of load on your machine... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 16:43:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9262F16A41B for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:43:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kimimeister@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF1113C459 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:43:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kimimeister@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so3838133waf.3 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:43:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=7LSeAbSouw7+tXovS9WdD4a8ZCUBNbs2Mtd+aLd1k1U=; b=vLSUf1SmfowkD/008/uQUxZtbeHdCD8ZU4XM9z857QIe94eJTvKPv35eEnDn4/Og3P6E0kPDzwKNFEGZVBNrBW86SKgfXzss1zvRM6IiGr3hU/0NvYhyWsjy/Zz0tX8NF/oJlvRJE/iUIzcOTDDOU3b7FgnWvvjf5kKN7ONzD54= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=xpmvqFXz+BqXeSL6XhZCAG9OlL+WQ4hyJKNXxl1bQPPExS5PA438dQs7TdvH06wCSG+lhtH1G323a4pNMRQ0abWRXlchPsy01x4zl9myxUO2UaMejz+yLfLP/VY+EdC8EypPUnANPU3YxRgQR/iYE1Xv9Au/+oInu71rVzGEeqs= Received: by 10.114.76.1 with SMTP id y1mr4999662waa.38.1200933813092; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:43:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.58.7 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 08:43:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <42b497160801210843s4b317f99p511c6f665ca7bfb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:43:33 +0000 From: Kimi To: Albert.Shih@obspm.fr In-Reply-To: <20080121161429.GA22111@pcjas.obspm.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080121161429.GA22111@pcjas.obspm.fr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS for production. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:43:33 -0000 On 21/01/2008, Albert Shih wrote: > Hi all. > > I would like to known if the ZFS "can" be use in production ? you need to test if it is suitable for your needs with stability, some people are using in production - I am no such a person. > Are there > here anyone to use ZFS in production server ? > you might want to check the archives for the CURRENT mailing list for clues/hints/tips. there was a big discussion not so far back as to what settings depend on what load etc you are doing, also i386 is not recommended, you are better off with amd64 and a 1GB of memory, but memory's cheap at the moment. > Lots of thanks. > > Regards. > > NB: I'm going to use 7.0 in production, but for the FS it's more complexe= , > if I lost some connexion because the 7.0 freeze is very different if I lo= st > all data. > -- > Albert SHIH > Observatoire de Paris Meudon > SIO batiment 15 > T=E9l=E9phone : 01 45 07 76 26 > Heure local/Local time: > Lun 21 jan 2008 17:12:24 CET > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > --=20 Regards, Kimi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 16:46:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB6016A418 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6500813C447 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0LGK2Hl092328 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:20:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m0LGK2Do092325 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:20:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:20:02 -0500 (EST) From: doug To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080121043616.d6321dcb.coolzone@it.dk> Message-ID: <20080121111855.I92107@fledge.watson.org> References: <14989042.post@talk.nabble.com> <20080121043616.d6321dcb.coolzone@it.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:20:02 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: How to install KDE4 on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: doug@safeport.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:46:50 -0000 Yes its only been ten days. First notice may appear on http:freebsd.kde.org. On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Rico Secada wrote: > On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:26:20 -0800 (PST) > uutorok wrote: > >> >> I find that there is no KDE 4 in ports. The only instruction I get is >> http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title ... E4/FreeBSD >> >> But there is not much information. Anyone who know how to build KDE >> 4 on FreeBSD? > > Wait patiently until it reaches the ports, or build it manually from > source. > >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/How-to-install-KDE4-on-FreeBSD--tp14989042p14989042.html >> Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 16:53:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE3D16A475 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:53:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0154413C507 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:53:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0LGrS7W026793; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:53:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9D035B82A; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:53:28 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:53:28 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Rakhesh Sasidharan Message-ID: <20080121165328.GA50246@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Rakhesh Sasidharan , Colin Brace , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080120161831.L62033@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080120142042.GA8576@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080120211904.D91357@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080121085901.R1673@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080121085901.R1673@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Colin Brace Subject: Re: Fixing a USB disk to a specific device name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:53:31 -0000 --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 08:59:30AM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: >=20 > Colin Brace wrote: >=20 >> I use udev rules to do this. See: >>=20 >> < >> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/make-removable-u= sb-hdd-mount-at-fixed-mount-point-511917/ >>>=20 >=20 > That doesn't work on FreeBSD, does it? Udev's a Linux thing last I heard = of=20 > ... You might be able to do that with devd(8). I don't know if you'll get attach events on disk devices, you'll have to try. Keep in mind that you cannot use devd to unmount! You'll have to unmount _before_ the device is detached/destroyed, or you might get a panic. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHlM4IEnfvsMMhpyURAvZJAKCasnZMq45lhYLfDlQFDCgmTmmesQCaAtLw 2XLsdqHvaSFhR8nT4DnOBsk= =B5lB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 16:54:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CF716A41A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:54:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) Received: from nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4273213C469 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:54:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B0F4D94F; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:54:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtps01.kuleuven.be (smtpshost01.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.74]) by nibbel.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532FB4D819; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:54:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from kalimero.kotnet.org (kalimero.kotnet.org [10.4.16.222]) by smtps01.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1291631E702; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:54:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from kalimero.kotnet.org (kalimero.kotnet.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.kotnet.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0LGskCX011061; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:54:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Tijl Coosemans To: Andreas Davour Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:54:44 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200801211348.29679.tijl@ulyssis.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801211754.45629.tijl@ulyssis.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Throttle the CPU when the system is idle X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:54:53 -0000 On Monday 21 January 2008 16:13:36 Andreas Davour wrote: > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> Throttling still made a huge difference on my systems. > > Many different opionions here. How did you do it then? In /etc/sysctl.conf: debug.cpufreq.lowest=400 In /etc/rc.conf: economy_cx_lowest="LOW" performance_cx_lowest="LOW" powerd_enable="YES" powerd_flags="-i 92 -r 65 -p 200" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 16:55:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AAB716A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:55:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35BC13C459 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:55:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0LGtpCw028143; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:55:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A66D7B832; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:55:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:55:51 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Rakhesh Sasidharan Message-ID: <20080121165551.GB50246@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Rakhesh Sasidharan , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080120161831.L62033@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080120142042.GA8576@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080121085409.T1673@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080121085409.T1673@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fixing a USB disk to a specific device name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:55:53 -0000 --LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 08:56:32AM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: >=20 >>> What I'd like to know is whether there's any way for me to ensure that = the >>> da0 disk always appears as da0. I don't want it that tomm I plug in ano= ther >>> disk (or change the order of disks, though I'll be more careful with th= at) >>> and suddenly da0 is no longer at da0! That would hamper the boot process >>> ... not nice. >>=20 >> It is possible, but not as daX. Use the glabel(8) utility to label your >> disks. They will show up as /dev/label/ >>=20 >> The daX devices are created as the device is plugged in, so AFAIK it's >> impossible to permanently assign them a certain daX device. >=20 > Just mentioning this for archival purposes. >=20 > If you are mounting a device as /dev/label/ at boot time, it= =20 > will fail unless you add a ''geom_label_load=3D"YES"'' to your=20 > /boot/loader.conf file. Had me stumped for a while. This loads the geom= =20 > label module at boot time and so labels are recognized. On 7.0-PRERELEASE, 'options GEOM_LABEL' is built into of the GENERIC kernel, so it shouldn't be necessary there. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHlM6XEnfvsMMhpyURAs39AJwKUM5YOAWf+Chzrlvqt1FdZ19XigCghLU+ Ard53cdD0aiJAZ6B3HdvdtI= =+bA+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LpQ9ahxlCli8rRTG-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 17:05:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0940E16A421 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:05:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@urgle.com) Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDEA513C45D for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:05:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@urgle.com) Received: from cheddar.urgle.com ([80.177.40.53]) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.67) id 1JH055-0008C3-3k; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:05:08 +0000 Received: from mike by cheddar.urgle.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JH052-000J1l-5I; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:05:04 +0000 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:05:04 +0000 From: Mike Bristow To: Rakhesh Sasidharan , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080121170504.GA73013@cheddar.urgle.com> References: <20080120161831.L62033@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080120142042.GA8576@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080121085409.T1673@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080121165551.GB50246@slackbox.xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080121165551.GB50246@slackbox.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: Subject: Re: Fixing a USB disk to a specific device name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:05:12 -0000 On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 05:55:51PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 08:56:32AM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: > > > >> It is possible, but not as daX. Use the glabel(8) utility to label your > >> disks. They will show up as /dev/label/ > > On 7.0-PRERELEASE, 'options GEOM_LABEL' is built into of the GENERIC > kernel, so it shouldn't be necessary there. Note that you can use UFS (and other filesystems labeling) too: for example. 'newfs -L bobs_disk' will cause the device containing it to appear as /dev/ufs/bobs_disk. This approach may be better for removable disks; it'll play better with other OSs, for example. -- Shenanigans! Shenanigans! Best of 3! -- Flash From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 17:15:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DB516A418 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:15:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlobo@digiart.art.br) Received: from ipad.com.br (recife.ipad.com.br [200.249.204.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88E4713C46E for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:15:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlobo@digiart.art.br) Received: (qmail 62797 invoked by uid 79); 21 Jan 2008 17:15:41 -0000 Received: from 189.70.227.91 by recife.ipad.com.br (envelope-from , uid 1008) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.92rc2/5505. spamassassin: 3.1.8. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(189.70.227.91):SA:0(-1.2/2.9):. Processed in 8.51938 secs); 21 Jan 2008 17:15:41 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=2.9 X-Antivirus-IPAD-Mail-From: mlobo@digiart.art.br via recife.ipad.com.br X-Antivirus-IPAD: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(189.70.227.91):SA:0(-1.2/2.9):. Processed in 8.51938 secs Process 62745) Received: from unknown (HELO lobo) (mlobo@digiart.art.br@189.70.227.91) by ipad.com.br with SMTP; 21 Jan 2008 17:15:32 -0000 From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:14:56 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080120161831.L62033@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080121165551.GB50246@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080121170504.GA73013@cheddar.urgle.com> In-Reply-To: <20080121170504.GA73013@cheddar.urgle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801211414.56749.> Subject: Re: Fixing a USB disk to a specific device name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:15:45 -0000 On Monday 21 January 2008 14:05:04 Mike Bristow wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 05:55:51PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 08:56:32AM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: > > >> It is possible, but not as daX. Use the glabel(8) utility to label > > >> your disks. They will show up as /dev/label/ > > > > On 7.0-PRERELEASE, 'options GEOM_LABEL' is built into of the GENERIC > > kernel, so it shouldn't be necessary there. > > Note that you can use UFS (and other filesystems labeling) too: for > example. 'newfs -L bobs_disk' will cause the device containing it to appear > as /dev/ufs/bobs_disk. > > This approach may be better for removable disks; it'll play better with > other OSs, for example. I simply put From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 17:15:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A2E16A47E for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:15:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlobo@digiart.art.br) Received: from ipad.com.br (recife.ipad.com.br [200.249.204.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4AF4A13C469 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:15:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlobo@digiart.art.br) Received: (qmail 62844 invoked by uid 79); 21 Jan 2008 17:15:48 -0000 Received: from 189.70.227.91 by recife.ipad.com.br (envelope-from , uid 1008) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.92rc2/5505. spamassassin: 3.1.8. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(189.70.227.91):SA:0(-1.1/2.9):. Processed in 4.813984 secs); 21 Jan 2008 17:15:48 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=2.9 X-Antivirus-IPAD-Mail-From: mlobo@digiart.art.br via recife.ipad.com.br X-Antivirus-IPAD: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(189.70.227.91):SA:0(-1.1/2.9):. Processed in 4.813984 secs Process 62804) Received: from unknown (HELO lobo) (mlobo@digiart.art.br@189.70.227.91) by ipad.com.br with SMTP; 21 Jan 2008 17:15:43 -0000 From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:15:55 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080120161831.L62033@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080121165551.GB50246@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080121170504.GA73013@cheddar.urgle.com> In-Reply-To: <20080121170504.GA73013@cheddar.urgle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801211415.56014.> Subject: Re: Fixing a USB disk to a specific device name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:15:50 -0000 On Monday 21 January 2008 14:05:04 Mike Bristow wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 05:55:51PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 08:56:32AM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: > > >> It is possible, but not as daX. Use the glabel(8) utility to label > > >> your disks. They will show up as /dev/label/ > > > > On 7.0-PRERELEASE, 'options GEOM_LABEL' is built into of the GENERIC > > kernel, so it shouldn't be necessary there. > > Note that you can use UFS (and other filesystems labeling) too: for > example. 'newfs -L bobs_disk' will cause the device containing it to appear > as /dev/ufs/bobs_disk. > > This approach may be better for removable disks; it'll play better with > other OSs, for example. I simply put: /dev/da0s1 /PenDrive msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 in my fstab. After pluging it in, i type mount /PenDrive From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 17:15:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B1E016A4CA for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:15:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlobo@digiart.art.br) Received: from ipad.com.br (recife.ipad.com.br [200.249.204.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3112D13C457 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:15:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlobo@digiart.art.br) Received: (qmail 62874 invoked by uid 79); 21 Jan 2008 17:15:52 -0000 Received: from 189.70.227.91 by recife.ipad.com.br (envelope-from , uid 1008) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.92rc2/5505. spamassassin: 3.1.8. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(189.70.227.91):SA:0(-1.1/2.9):. Processed in 3.842737 secs); 21 Jan 2008 17:15:52 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.1 required=2.9 X-Antivirus-IPAD-Mail-From: mlobo@digiart.art.br via recife.ipad.com.br X-Antivirus-IPAD: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(189.70.227.91):SA:0(-1.1/2.9):. Processed in 3.842737 secs Process 62847) Received: from unknown (HELO lobo) (mlobo@digiart.art.br@189.70.227.91) by ipad.com.br with SMTP; 21 Jan 2008 17:15:48 -0000 From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:16:50 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080120161831.L62033@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080121165551.GB50246@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080121170504.GA73013@cheddar.urgle.com> In-Reply-To: <20080121170504.GA73013@cheddar.urgle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801211416.50316.> Subject: Re: Fixing a USB disk to a specific device name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:15:54 -0000 On Monday 21 January 2008 14:05:04 Mike Bristow wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 05:55:51PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 08:56:32AM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: > > >> It is possible, but not as daX. Use the glabel(8) utility to label > > >> your disks. They will show up as /dev/label/ > > > > On 7.0-PRERELEASE, 'options GEOM_LABEL' is built into of the GENERIC > > kernel, so it shouldn't be necessary there. > > Note that you can use UFS (and other filesystems labeling) too: for > example. 'newfs -L bobs_disk' will cause the device containing it to appear > as /dev/ufs/bobs_disk. > > This approach may be better for removable disks; it'll play better with > other OSs, for example. I simply put; /dev/da0s1 /PenDrive msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 in fstab. After pluging it in, i type mount /PenDrive Mario From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 17:15:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064B316A4FF for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:15:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlobo@digiart.art.br) Received: from ipad.com.br (recife.ipad.com.br [200.249.204.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1818713C4D5 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:15:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlobo@digiart.art.br) Received: (qmail 62890 invoked by uid 79); 21 Jan 2008 17:15:56 -0000 Received: from 189.70.227.91 by recife.ipad.com.br (envelope-from , uid 1008) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.92rc2/5505. spamassassin: 3.1.8. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(189.70.227.91):SA:0(-2.2/2.9):. Processed in 3.70205 secs); 21 Jan 2008 17:15:56 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=2.9 X-Antivirus-IPAD-Mail-From: mlobo@digiart.art.br via recife.ipad.com.br X-Antivirus-IPAD: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(189.70.227.91):SA:0(-2.2/2.9):. Processed in 3.70205 secs Process 62877) Received: from unknown (HELO lobo) (mlobo@digiart.art.br@189.70.227.91) by ipad.com.br with SMTP; 21 Jan 2008 17:15:52 -0000 From: Mario Lobo Organization: DigiArt Systems To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:19:54 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080120161831.L62033@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080121165551.GB50246@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080121170504.GA73013@cheddar.urgle.com> In-Reply-To: <20080121170504.GA73013@cheddar.urgle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801211419.54729.mlobo@digiart.art.br> Subject: Re: Fixing a USB disk to a specific device name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:15:58 -0000 On Monday 21 January 2008 14:05:04 Mike Bristow wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 05:55:51PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 08:56:32AM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: > > >> It is possible, but not as daX. Use the glabel(8) utility to label > > >> your disks. They will show up as /dev/label/ > > > > On 7.0-PRERELEASE, 'options GEOM_LABEL' is built into of the GENERIC > > kernel, so it shouldn't be necessary there. > > Note that you can use UFS (and other filesystems labeling) too: for > example. 'newfs -L bobs_disk' will cause the device containing it to appear > as /dev/ufs/bobs_disk. > > This approach may be better for removable disks; it'll play better with > other OSs, for example. I simply put /dev/da0s1 /PenDrive msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 on fstab. After I plug it in, I type mount /PenDrive. In KDE, I use Kwikdisk to mount it. Mario Lobo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 17:19:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77AC716A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:19:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlobo@digiart.art.br) Received: from ipad.com.br (recife.ipad.com.br [200.249.204.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A4ABA13C458 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:19:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlobo@digiart.art.br) Received: (qmail 63737 invoked by uid 79); 21 Jan 2008 17:19:05 -0000 Received: from 189.70.227.91 by recife.ipad.com.br (envelope-from , uid 1008) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.92rc2/5505. spamassassin: 3.1.8. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(189.70.227.91):SA:0(-2.1/2.9):. Processed in 3.852576 secs); 21 Jan 2008 17:19:05 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=2.9 X-Antivirus-IPAD-Mail-From: mlobo@digiart.art.br via recife.ipad.com.br X-Antivirus-IPAD: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(189.70.227.91):SA:0(-2.1/2.9):. Processed in 3.852576 secs Process 63723) Received: from unknown (HELO lobo) (mlobo@digiart.art.br@189.70.227.91) by ipad.com.br with SMTP; 21 Jan 2008 17:19:01 -0000 From: Mario Lobo Organization: DigiArt Systems To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:23:34 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080120161831.L62033@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080121170504.GA73013@cheddar.urgle.com> <200801211414.56749.> In-Reply-To: <200801211414.56749.> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801211423.34742.mlobo@digiart.art.br> Subject: Re: Fixing a USB disk to a specific device name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:19:07 -0000 On Monday 21 January 2008 14:14:56 Mario Lobo wrote: > On Monday 21 January 2008 14:05:04 Mike Bristow wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 05:55:51PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 08:56:32AM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: > > > >> It is possible, but not as daX. Use the glabel(8) utility to label > > > >> your disks. They will show up as /dev/label/ > > > > > > On 7.0-PRERELEASE, 'options GEOM_LABEL' is built into of the GENERIC > > > kernel, so it shouldn't be necessary there. > > > > Note that you can use UFS (and other filesystems labeling) too: for > > example. 'newfs -L bobs_disk' will cause the device containing it to > > appear as /dev/ufs/bobs_disk. > > > > This approach may be better for removable disks; it'll play better with > > other OSs, for example. > > I simply put > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Sorry :( I simply put: /dev/da0s1 /PenDrive msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 on fstab. After pluging in, I type mount /PenDrive. - Mario Lobo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 17:25:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358C216A421 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:25:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlobo@digiart.art.br) Received: from ipad.com.br (recife.ipad.com.br [200.249.204.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6244A13C45B for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:25:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mlobo@digiart.art.br) Received: (qmail 65238 invoked by uid 79); 21 Jan 2008 17:25:18 -0000 Received: from 189.70.227.91 by recife.ipad.com.br (envelope-from , uid 1008) with qmail-scanner-1.25-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.92rc2/5505. spamassassin: 3.1.8. perlscan: 1.25-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(189.70.227.91):SA:0(-2.1/2.9):. Processed in 3.647709 secs); 21 Jan 2008 17:25:18 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=2.9 X-Antivirus-IPAD-Mail-From: mlobo@digiart.art.br via recife.ipad.com.br X-Antivirus-IPAD: 1.25-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(189.70.227.91):SA:0(-2.1/2.9):. Processed in 3.647709 secs Process 65204) Received: from unknown (HELO lobo) (mlobo@digiart.art.br@189.70.227.91) by ipad.com.br with SMTP; 21 Jan 2008 17:25:14 -0000 From: Mario Lobo Organization: DigiArt Systems To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:29:47 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080120161831.L62033@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080121170504.GA73013@cheddar.urgle.com> <200801211419.54729.mlobo@digiart.art.br> In-Reply-To: <200801211419.54729.mlobo@digiart.art.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801211429.47891.mlobo@digiart.art.br> Subject: Re: Fixing a USB disk to a specific device name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:25:21 -0000 On Monday 21 January 2008 14:19:54 Mario Lobo wrote: > On Monday 21 January 2008 14:05:04 Mike Bristow wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 05:55:51PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 08:56:32AM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: > > > >> It is possible, but not as daX. Use the glabel(8) utility to label > > > >> your disks. They will show up as /dev/label/ > > > > > > On 7.0-PRERELEASE, 'options GEOM_LABEL' is built into of the GENERIC > > > kernel, so it shouldn't be necessary there. > > > > Note that you can use UFS (and other filesystems labeling) too: for > > example. 'newfs -L bobs_disk' will cause the device containing it to > > appear as /dev/ufs/bobs_disk. > > > > This approach may be better for removable disks; it'll play better with > > other OSs, for example. > > I simply put > > /dev/da0s1 /PenDrive msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 > > on fstab. After I plug it in, I type > > mount /PenDrive. In KDE, I use Kwikdisk to mount it. > > Mario Lobo > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Sorry for the multiple posts. I have just installed FBSD 7 here on my desktop and I am struggling a bit to recover my kmail configs from my previous 6.2. By the way, I've been using it for 3 days and I must say right way how incredibly improved and smooth multitasking is on 7 !! Mario Lobo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 17:26:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C885916A41A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:26:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC0213C467 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:26:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JH0PF-00053f-1B for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:25:57 -0800 Message-ID: <15002202.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 09:25:57 -0800 (PST) From: uutorok To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080121111855.I92107@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: worldhoho@gmail.com References: <14989042.post@talk.nabble.com> <20080121043616.d6321dcb.coolzone@it.dk> <20080121111855.I92107@fledge.watson.org> Subject: Re: How to install KDE4 on FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:26:01 -0000 Thanks a lot. doug-28 wrote: > > Yes its only been ten days. First notice may appear on > http:freebsd.kde.org. > > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Rico Secada wrote: > >> On Sun, 20 Jan 2008 16:26:20 -0800 (PST) >> uutorok wrote: >> >>> >>> I find that there is no KDE 4 in ports. The only instruction I get is >>> http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title ... E4/FreeBSD >>> >>> But there is not much information. Anyone who know how to build KDE >>> 4 on FreeBSD? >> >> Wait patiently until it reaches the ports, or build it manually from >> source. >> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://www.nabble.com/How-to-install-KDE4-on-FreeBSD--tp14989042p14989042.html >>> Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/How-to-install-KDE4-on-FreeBSD--tp14989042p15002202.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 17:44:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C221616A420 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:44:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from iota.fastbighost.com (iota.fastbighost.com [65.98.8.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9479513C458 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:44:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from [89.123.34.240] (port=60880 helo=deimos.bsd.nix) by iota.fastbighost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JH0gw-00016i-4q; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:44:14 +0000 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:43:19 +0200 From: Ghirai To: Andreas Davour Message-Id: <20080121194319.15a718ea.ghirai@ghirai.com> In-Reply-To: References: <47941E71.9070403@pacific.net.sg> <4794BAA9.7040609@pacific.net.sg> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: ghirai@ghirai.com X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - iota.fastbighost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ghirai.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Throttle the CPU when the system is idle X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:44:22 -0000 On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:41:41 +0100 (CET) Andreas Davour wrote: > > Hmmmm. This actually works, without any hangups. I wonder if I managed > to hit upon a odd bug yesterday? > > /andreas > I've been using it since 6.2 on 4 intel boxes (one of them a notebook) without any problems. You can check the available freq. steps with sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq_levels and see the current speed with sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq. Do make sure you set the debug.cpufreq.lowest to a sensible value, otherwise things will be somewhat sluggish. -- Regards, Ghirai. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 18:04:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A7216A46C for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:04:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16EFD13C47E for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:04:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr3.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0LI3msQ064104; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:03:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0805FB82A; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:03:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:03:48 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Mario Lobo Message-ID: <20080121180348.GA52225@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Mario Lobo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn" Content-Disposition: inline X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fixing a USB disk to a specific device name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:04:07 -0000 --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 02:16:50PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote: > On Monday 21 January 2008 14:05:04 Mike Bristow wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 05:55:51PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 08:56:32AM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: > > > >> It is possible, but not as daX. Use the glabel(8) utility to label > > > >> your disks. They will show up as /dev/label/ > > > > > > On 7.0-PRERELEASE, 'options GEOM_LABEL' is built into of the GENERIC > > > kernel, so it shouldn't be necessary there. > > > > Note that you can use UFS (and other filesystems labeling) too: for > > example. 'newfs -L bobs_disk' will cause the device containing it to ap= pear > > as /dev/ufs/bobs_disk. > > > > This approach may be better for removable disks; it'll play better with > > other OSs, for example. >=20 > I simply put; >=20 > /dev/da0s1 /PenDrive msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 >=20 > in fstab. After pluging it in, i type=20 >=20 > mount /PenDrive Keep in mind that this only works for _one_ drive. As soon as you have two, this won't work correctly. If you have multiple drives, you should label them (with newfs_msdos or mtools) e.g. 'diskA' and 'diskB'. With GEOM_LABEL you'll then get /dev/msdosfs/diskA and /dev/msdosfs/diskB, which you can then put in your /etc/fstab; /dev/msdosfs/diskA /mnt/diskA msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 /dev/msdosfs/diskB /mnt/diskB msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 Of course you need to own /mnt/diskX if you want to mount it as a normal us= er. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHlN6DEnfvsMMhpyURAiuKAJwIW9MJWn5m1IoqT/bO3X9WfSZBiQCgn7Fi O8gAEAktpgVXopYUT0kZy8E= =qqPn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 18:04:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53AB116A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:04:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from StevenFriedrich@InsightBB.com) Received: from mxsf06.insightbb.com (mxsf06.insightbb.com [74.128.0.76]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D9013C4CC for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:04:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from StevenFriedrich@InsightBB.com) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,227,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="202989697" Received: from unknown (HELO asav00.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.124]) by mxsf06.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2008 12:36:31 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,227,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="150284503" Received: from 208-46-39-11.dia.static.qwest.net (HELO [10.7.44.143]) ([208.46.39.11]) by asavout00.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2008 12:36:31 -0500 Message-ID: <4794D81D.4030805@InsightBB.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:36:29 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (Windows/20071210) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: boot loader anomaly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:04:58 -0000 I'm getting an error message "zpool_cache...failed!" during boot. You have to disable beastie to see it... Here's the output that I wrote down: BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.01 Consoles: internal video/kerboard BIOS drive C: is disk0 BIOS drive D: is disk1 BIOS drive E: is disk2 BIOS 637kB/522176kB available memory FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1 (root@freeBSD.StevenFriedrich.org, Mon Jan 21 10:12:31 EST 2008) Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf /boot/kernel/kernel text=0x6ed4ac data=0xadb60+0x5ac20 syms=[0x4+0x710d0+0x4+0x90f05] zpool_cache...failed! | Hit [Enter] to boot immediately, or any other key for command prompt. Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel] in 9 seconds... Here's the uname output uname -a FreeBSD freeBSD.StevenFriedrich.org 7.0-RC1 FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 #0: Mon Jan 21 11:03:28 EST 2008 root@freeBSD.StevenFriedrich.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 And my /boot/loader.conf verbose_loading="YES" # Set to YES for verbose loader output beastie_disable="YES" # Turn the beastie boot menu on and off Is this a bug, or am I missing some configuration bit? -- Steven Friedrich Louisville, KY 40216 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 18:07:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A597116A468 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:07:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from virtual.micronet.sk (smtp.micronet.sk [84.16.32.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CFD13C4FB for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:07:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B1B10E611; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:06:35 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at virtual.micronet.sk Received: from virtual.micronet.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (virtual.micronet.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sFb8QsA6k6Cu; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:06:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from DANGER-PC (danger.mcrn.sk [84.16.37.254]) by virtual.micronet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4417810E77E; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:06:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:07:19 +0100 From: Daniel Gerzo X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.99.3) Professional Organization: The FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1198067755.20080121190719@rulez.sk> To: Ian Smith In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw(8) doc bug? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Gerzo List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:07:29 -0000 Hello Ian, Monday, January 21, 2008, 2:42:53 PM, you wrote: > I was just browsing various versions of ipfw(8) such as: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ipfw&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+6.3-stable&format=html > and noticed that (and 6.3-RELEASE) manuals sport 'FreeBSD 7.0' footers, > however the proper FreeBSD 7 manual includes the new 'ipfw nat' section, > so is different in at least that respect. As far as I know, this isn't a bug. The reason why you see "FreeBSD 7.0" in the footer is that the machine, which is serving the online manuals is running 7.0, but the real content of the man page is the same as you will find in the 6.3-RELEASE. -- Best regards, Daniel mailto:danger@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 18:08:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B9316A46D for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:08:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sdavtaker@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F1DC13C4EF for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:08:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sdavtaker@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 68so661220wra.13 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:08:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=CilWdqakwX52UPUdZxTboMqwmtPBSshRU87TfDx8ktc=; b=rrqRR3hOrAC2s4LjprW1w5WVgvoKq9sWL4BBfKJt6QrlUBsViL/VLbUvIA1u/xWAN86QWBpf6yUdaItBRuihJg097jqH7njtNSXJBwLknzv9TiQbv+/pVSv3S+UTRcSkgpxaziWdJ7MLY0AYNdoqQtCrsktClQd+XUPstvkgbEg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Mt7XunoXPvCTY3auS/sA7OafHl1Uk4eafg/dYTz3q1XoaYWnA6AuptIFxcZS8eo8pzjXMtv+sIUYtGM8Am86NBxMDqDljyKyv6wQTQgbkokv9ak5Fes742Hna5EoGZKd+XwK12B+rUz/q5cqDJ7z7FadYyEU/U/7ks633NNLUhU= Received: by 10.150.153.19 with SMTP id a19mr2435349ybe.38.1200938883516; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:08:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.70.20 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:08:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:08:03 -0300 From: "=?UTF-8?Q?Sd=C3=A4vtaker?=" To: "=?UTF-8?Q?Sd=C3=A4vtaker?=" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080121155947.GA62290@owl.midgard.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080121155947.GA62290@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Cc: Subject: Re: RLT8139d drivers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:08:05 -0000 SXQgZG9lc250IGFwcGVhciBpbiBwY2ljb25mIChvdXRwdXQgaXMgcGFzdGVkIGJlbG93KS4gSSBy ZW1vdmVkIGl0IGFuZAp0cnllZCBtYWtlIGl0IHdvcmsgaW4gYSB3aW54cCBtYWNoaW5lIGFuZCBp dCB3YXMgc3VjY2Vzc2Z1bGx5IHdvcmtpbmcsCnNvIGlzIG5vdCBoYXJkd2FyZSBwcm9ibGVtIChh dCBsZWFzdCBub3QgaW4gdGhlIG5pYykuCkFueSBpZGVhIHdoeSBpcyBub3Qgd29ya2luZz8sIHRo ZSBjYXJkIGNoaXAgc2F5cyAiODEzOWQiLCBteSBrZXJuZWwgaXMKcmVsZWFzZSBnZW5lcmljLgpJ cyBpdCB0aGUgbm9uZTA/CnRoYW5rcyBmb3IgcmVwbHkgbWUgOi0pCgpwY2ljb25mIC1sdgphZ3Aw QHBjaTA6MDowOiAgY2xhc3M9MHgwNjAwMDAgY2FyZD0weDAwMDAxMTA2IGNoaXA9MHgzMTIzMTEw NiByZXY9MHgwMCBoZHI9MHgwMAogICAgdmVuZG9yICAgPSAnVklBIFRlY2hub2xvZ2llcyBJbmMn CiAgICBkZXZpY2UgICA9ICdWVDg2MjMgQXBvbGxvIENMRTI2NiBDYXN0bGVSb2NrIENQVSB0byBQ Q0kgQnJpZGdlJwogICAgY2xhc3MgICAgPSBicmlkZ2UKICAgIHN1YmNsYXNzID0gSE9TVC1QQ0kK cGNpYjFAcGNpMDoxOjA6IGNsYXNzPTB4MDYwNDAwIGNhcmQ9MHgwMDAwMDA4MCBjaGlwPTB4YjA5 MTExMDYgcmV2PTB4MDAgaGRyPTB4MDEKICAgIHZlbmRvciAgID0gJ1ZJQSBUZWNobm9sb2dpZXMg SW5jJwogICAgZGV2aWNlICAgPSAnVlQ4NjMzIEFwb2xsbyBQcm8gMjY2IENQVSB0byBBR1AgQ29u dHJvbGxlcicKICAgIGNsYXNzICAgID0gYnJpZGdlCiAgICBzdWJjbGFzcyA9IFBDSS1QQ0kKbm9u ZTBAcGNpMDo4OjA6IGNsYXNzPTB4MDIwMDAwIGNhcmQ9MHgwMDAwMDAwMCBjaGlwPTB4ODEzOTE5 MDQgcmV2PTB4MDEgaGRyPTB4MDAKICAgIGNsYXNzICAgID0gbmV0d29yawogICAgc3ViY2xhc3Mg PSBldGhlcm5ldAp1aGNpMEBwY2kwOjE2OjA6ICAgICAgICBjbGFzcz0weDBjMDMwMCBjYXJkPTB4 MzAzODExMDYgY2hpcD0weDMwMzgxMTA2CnJldj0weDgwIGhkcj0weDAwCiAgICB2ZW5kb3IgICA9 ICdWSUEgVGVjaG5vbG9naWVzIEluYycKICAgIGRldmljZSAgID0gJ1ZUODJ4eHh4eCBVSENJIFVT QiAxLjEgQ29udHJvbGxlciAoQWxsIFZJQSBDaGlwc2V0cyknCiAgICBjbGFzcyAgICA9IHNlcmlh bCBidXMKICAgIHN1YmNsYXNzID0gVVNCCnVoY2kxQHBjaTA6MTY6MTogICAgICAgIGNsYXNzPTB4 MGMwMzAwIGNhcmQ9MHgzMDM4MTEwNiBjaGlwPTB4MzAzODExMDYKcmV2PTB4ODAgaGRyPTB4MDAK ICAgIHZlbmRvciAgID0gJ1ZJQSBUZWNobm9sb2dpZXMgSW5jJwogICAgZGV2aWNlICAgPSAnVlQ4 Mnh4eHh4IFVIQ0kgVVNCIDEuMSBDb250cm9sbGVyIChBbGwgVklBIENoaXBzZXRzKScKICAgIGNs YXNzICAgID0gc2VyaWFsIGJ1cwogICAgc3ViY2xhc3MgPSBVU0IKdWhjaTJAcGNpMDoxNjoyOiAg ICAgICAgY2xhc3M9MHgwYzAzMDAgY2FyZD0weDMwMzgxMTA2IGNoaXA9MHgzMDM4MTEwNgpyZXY9 MHg4MCBoZHI9MHgwMAogICAgdmVuZG9yICAgPSAnVklBIFRlY2hub2xvZ2llcyBJbmMnCiAgICBk ZXZpY2UgICA9ICdWVDgyeHh4eHggVUhDSSBVU0IgMS4xIENvbnRyb2xsZXIgKEFsbCBWSUEgQ2hp cHNldHMpJwogICAgY2xhc3MgICAgPSBzZXJpYWwgYnVzCiAgICBzdWJjbGFzcyA9IFVTQgplaGNp MEBwY2kwOjE2OjM6ICAgICAgICBjbGFzcz0weDBjMDMyMCBjYXJkPTB4MzEwNDExMDYgY2hpcD0w eDMxMDQxMTA2CnJldj0weDgyIGhkcj0weDAwCiAgICB2ZW5kb3IgICA9ICdWSUEgVGVjaG5vbG9n aWVzIEluYycKICAgIGRldmljZSAgID0gJ1ZUNjIwMiBVU0IgMi4wIEVuaGFuY2VkIEhvc3QgQ29u dHJvbGxlcicKICAgIGNsYXNzICAgID0gc2VyaWFsIGJ1cwogICAgc3ViY2xhc3MgPSBVU0IKaXNh YjBAcGNpMDoxNzowOiAgICAgICAgY2xhc3M9MHgwNjAxMDAgY2FyZD0weDAwMDAxMTA2IGNoaXA9 MHgzMTc3MTEwNgpyZXY9MHgwMCBoZHI9MHgwMAogICAgdmVuZG9yICAgPSAnVklBIFRlY2hub2xv Z2llcyBJbmMnCiAgICBkZXZpY2UgICA9ICdWVDgyMzUgUENJIHRvIElTQSBCcmlkZ2UnCiAgICBj bGFzcyAgICA9IGJyaWRnZQogICAgc3ViY2xhc3MgPSBQQ0ktSVNBCmF0YXBjaTBAcGNpMDoxNzox OiAgICAgIGNsYXNzPTB4MDEwMThhIGNhcmQ9MHgwNTcxMTEwNiBjaGlwPTB4MDU3MTExMDYKcmV2 PTB4MDYgaGRyPTB4MDAKICAgIHZlbmRvciAgID0gJ1ZJQSBUZWNobm9sb2dpZXMgSW5jJwogICAg ZGV2aWNlICAgPSAnVlQ4Mnh4eHggRUlERSBDb250cm9sbGVyIChBbGwgVklBIENoaXBzZXRzKScK ICAgIGNsYXNzICAgID0gbWFzcyBzdG9yYWdlCiAgICBzdWJjbGFzcyA9IEFUQQpub25lMUBwY2kw OjE3OjU6ICAgICAgICBjbGFzcz0weDA0MDEwMCBjYXJkPTB4NDE2MTExMDYgY2hpcD0weDMwNTkx MTA2CnJldj0weDUwIGhkcj0weDAwCiAgICB2ZW5kb3IgICA9ICdWSUEgVGVjaG5vbG9naWVzIElu YycKICAgIGRldmljZSAgID0gJ1ZUODIzMy8zM0EvODIzNS84MjM3IEFDOTcgRW5oYW5jZWQgQXVk aW8gQ29udHJvbGxlcicKICAgIGNsYXNzICAgID0gbXVsdGltZWRpYQogICAgc3ViY2xhc3MgPSBh dWRpbwpub25lMkBwY2kwOjE3OjY6ICAgICAgICBjbGFzcz0weDA3ODAwMCBjYXJkPTB4NGMyMTE1 NDMgY2hpcD0weDMwNjgxMTA2CnJldj0weDgwIGhkcj0weDAwCiAgICB2ZW5kb3IgICA9ICdWSUEg VGVjaG5vbG9naWVzIEluYycKICAgIGRldmljZSAgID0gJ1ZUODJDNjg2L0EvQixWVDgyMzMvQSBN b2RlbSBDb2RlYycKICAgIGNsYXNzICAgID0gc2ltcGxlIGNvbW1zCnZyMEBwY2kwOjE4OjA6ICBj bGFzcz0weDAyMDAwMCBjYXJkPTB4MDEwMjExMDYgY2hpcD0weDMwNjUxMTA2IHJldj0weDc0IGhk cj0weDAwCiAgICB2ZW5kb3IgICA9ICdWSUEgVGVjaG5vbG9naWVzIEluYycKICAgIGRldmljZSAg ID0gJ1ZUNjEwMiBSaGluZSBJSSBQQ0kgRmFzdCBFdGhlcm5ldCBDb250cm9sbGVyJwogICAgY2xh c3MgICAgPSBuZXR3b3JrCiAgICBzdWJjbGFzcyA9IGV0aGVybmV0Cm5vbmUzQHBjaTE6MDowOiBj bGFzcz0weDAzMDAwMCBjYXJkPTB4MzEyMjExMDYgY2hpcD0weDMxMjIxMTA2IHJldj0weDAzIGhk cj0weDAwCiAgICB2ZW5kb3IgICA9ICdWSUEgVGVjaG5vbG9naWVzIEluYycKICAgIGRldmljZSAg ID0gJ1ZUODYyMyBBcG9sbG8gQ0xFMjY2IENhc3RsZVJvY2sgQUdQIDhYIENvbnRyb2xsZXInCiAg ICBjbGFzcyAgICA9IGRpc3BsYXkKICAgIHN1YmNsYXNzID0gVkdBCgpPbiBKYW4gMjEsIDIwMDgg MTI6NTkgUE0sIEVyaWsgVHJ1bHNzb24gPGVydHIxMDEzQHN0dWRlbnQudXUuc2U+IHdyb3RlOgo+ Cj4gT24gTW9uLCBKYW4gMjEsIDIwMDggYXQgMTE6NTc6MjRBTSAtMDMwMCwgU2TDpHZ0YWtlciB3 cm90ZToKPiA+IEhlbGxvLgo+ID4gSW0gcnVubmluZyBGQlNEIDYuMnJlbGVhc2UuCj4gPiBJIGdv dCBhbiBvbGQgUkxUIDgxMzkgMS8xMG0gd29ya2luZyBpbiBteSBpYTMyIHBjLCB1c2VkIGl0IGZv ciBsb25nCj4gPiB0aW1lIGFuZCB3YW50ZWQgdG8gYnV5IGEgc2Vjb25kIG9uZSBmb3Igcm91dGlu ZywgY291bGRudCBmaW5kIG9uZSBvZgo+ID4gdGhvc2UsIGFuZCBib3VnaHQgYSAxMC8xMDAvMTAw MCBybHQ4MTM5ZCwgRkJTRCBpcyBub3QgZGV0ZWN0aW5nIGl0LCBpCj4gPiB3YXMgZ29vZ2xpbmcg IGFuZCBmb3VuZCBvdXQgdGhhdCA4MTM5YysgZHJpdmVycyBhcmUgbm90IGNvbXBhdGlibGUKPiA+ IHdpdGggdGhlIG9sZCBkcml2ZXJzLgo+ID4gSXMgdGhlcmUgYW55IHdheSB0byBtYWtlIGl0IHdv cms/Cj4gPiBUaGFua3MgZm9yIGFueSBoZWxwLgo+ID4gU2Rhdgo+Cj4gVGhlIFJUTDgxMzlEIGlz IGEgMTAvMTAwTWJpdCBjaGlwIHRoYXQgaXMgc3VwcG9ydGVkIGJ5IHRoZSBybCg0KSBkcml2ZXIg YW5kCj4gY2FuIGJlIGZvdW5kIG9uIHRoZSBtYWpvcml0eSBvZiByZWFsbHkgY2hlYXAgTklDcyB0 aGVzZSBkYXlzLAo+IFRoZSBSVEw4MTY5LzgxNjlTIGlzIGEgMTAvMTAwLzEwMDBNYml0IGNoaXAg dGhhdCBpcyBzdXBwb3J0ZWQgYnkgdGhlIHJlKDQpIGRyaXZlcgo+IGFuZCBpcyBxdWl0ZSBjb21t b24gb24gY2hlYXAgZ2lnYWJpdC1OSUNzLgo+IFRoZSBSVEw4MTM5QysgKHdoaWNoIGlzIG5vdCB0 aGUgc2FtZSBhcyB0aGUgUlRMODEzOUMgb3IgUlRMODEzOUQpIGlzIGEKPiAxMC8xMDBNIGNoaXAg d2hpY2ggaXMgYWxzbyBzdXBwb3J0ZWQgYnkgdGhlIHJlKDQpIGRyaXZlci4KPgo+IElmIEZyZWVC U0QgY2Fubm90IGRldGVjdCB5b3VyIE5JQyB0aGVuIHlvdSB3aWxsIGhhdmUgdG8gc2VuZCBtb3Jl Cj4gaW5mb3JtYXRpb24gdG8gaGVscCBwZW9wbGUgZmlndXJlIG91dCB3aGF0IGV4YWN0IGhhcmR3 YXJlIHlvdSBoYXZlCj4gYW5kIHdoYXQgd291bGQgYmUgbmVlZGVkIHRvIG1ha2UgaXQgd29yay4K Pgo+IFRoZSBvdXRwdXQgb2YgJ3BjaWNvbmYgLWx2JyBzaG91bGQgYmUgYSBnb29kIHN0YXJ0LiAg KEluY2x1ZGUgdGhlIGZ1bGwKPiBvdXRwdXQsIG5vdCBqdXN0IHRoZSBsaW5lcyB5b3UgdGhpbmsg YXJlIGltcG9ydGFudC4pCj4KPgo+Cj4KPgo+Cj4gLS0KPiA8SW5zZXJ0IHlvdXIgZmF2b3VyaXRl IHF1b3RlIGhlcmUuPgo+IEVyaWsgVHJ1bHNzb24KPiBlcnRyMTAxM0BzdHVkZW50LnV1LnNlCj4K CgoKLS0gClNkw6R2dGFrZXIgcHJheXMgdG8gUmlra3UgZ29kZGVzcyBmb3IgYSBnb29kIHRyZWFz dXJlLgo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 18:12:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B945116A41A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:12:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95AF613C43E for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:12:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so3879833waf.3 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:12:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=7Tj56s0W3l/ohR0Sb7HQa6JWGW8jaOMud1EWDljJo4g=; b=mtDceuf/Vpm+7jDcHo3z4lMQLwU+iaZSRdPI3xstPx9dmyvdzd29ixLxmjCXw6njYOHJKHjoeDQvVZRYLRqk6IzQB5VEXQcuapHblKzzjWDUdzYl6Ru8tJ97IBJilSy+sIg5VdPtuO4OekvPCvIL6giKwyocA/0pyTxSBuGslYg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=prbN/b7QgaaDKKuw7ADkbEEh775rLiqNu5xbihpWUOx+r4s6mzusavnny3k9ImZCd9qdPYxbq/M06WcbBHN0LqqkYo1vNVAQ9K73eSX0VW1vyfSdgsZDZ1DyKFKbaa2IIzu93oQ41eWnlzKxZIffEzCOKZxinx1q4NiNBASa5QY= Received: by 10.114.79.1 with SMTP id c1mr4032690wab.148.1200939170225; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:12:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.52.14 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:12:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8d23ec860801211012j60d3eb39x19e3076f3b608338@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:12:50 -0500 From: Schiz0 To: "User Questions" In-Reply-To: <8d23ec860801091038i4878b8b1lbfbacbd8a4dbac73@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8d23ec860801091038i4878b8b1lbfbacbd8a4dbac73@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Boot Loader Broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 18:12:50 -0000 On Jan 9, 2008 1:38 PM, Schiz0 wrote: > Hey, > > I recently upgraded from 6.3-PRERELEASE to 7.0-PRERELEASE. I had some > problem with the ports, but I got that taken care of. > > Now I'm having another very odd problem. > > I originally noticed something odd when I tried to shutdown from > multiuser mode into single user mode. I ran "shutdown now" as root in > multiuser. It said it was shutting down, etc. But then, it gave me the > normal multiuser login prompt. So then I tried rebooting completely, > and that's where the big error came up: > > ----------------------------------------------------- > FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1 > (root@Mercury, Tue Jan 8 14:22:21 EST 2008) > > \ > \: unknown command > - > /boot/kernel/kernel text=0x29e868 data=0x2db8c+0x23814 > syms=[0x4+0x34c10+0x4+0x43ef1] > Hit [Enter] to boot immediately, or any other key for a command prompt. > Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel] in 4 seconds ... > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Why it trying to run the command "\" ? Right before I did this, I > rebuilt world, including the kernel. I installed the new kernel, and > was moving down to single user to install world. > > Is my bootloader corrupt somehow? > > Thanks. > I'm still having this problem. I installed from the 7.0-RC1 Boot Only iso. It worked fine. I csuped RELENG_7 and built world, and now it's giving me the same error. There's nothign weird in /etc/fstab. I didn't change any files in /boot. I put the 7.0-RC1 CD in the drive, and diff'ed the /boot from MY system and the /boot from the CD. Nothing was different. I ran diff on the loader.conf, loader.rc, and all the .4th files. Note, I can still boot up fine. I just hit enter at that error prompt and it boots ok. Now, I'm even in a bigger hole. My power died this weekend, and I guess the / partition has some errors on it, so it is being mounted read-only. But I'm unable to get into single user mode. I tried "shutdown now" and "init 1" and they both brought me back to the multi-user login prompt. And there's no menu to reboot and select single user mode from. Can someone help me either solve the bootloader problem, or just how to get into single user mode? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 19:33:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8114E16A418 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:33:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1987@borozo.com) Received: from smtp.3dresearch.com (dorabella.3dresearch.com [66.167.251.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0B613C4EB for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:33:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1987@borozo.com) Received: from fracasso.3dresearch.com (c-71-61-128-39.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.61.128.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by vmail.3dresearch.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E47A9D759 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:49:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from fracasso.3dresearch.com (fracasso.3dresearch.com [10.61.70.2]) by fracasso.3dresearch.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A661703C for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:49:13 -0500 (EST) From: Joe Demeny To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:49:11 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801211349.11860.jd1987@borozo.com> Subject: make installworld failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:33:18 -0000 After building world and kernel, installed kernel, but got an error when I tried make installworld: # make installworld mkdir -p /tmp/install.uV1yfKEs for prog in [ awk cap_mkdb cat chflags chmod chown date echo egrep find grep install-info ln lockf make mkdir mtree mv pwd_mkdb rm sed sh sysctl test true uname wc zic; do cp `which $prog` /tmp/install.uV1yfKEs; done cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj MACHINE_ARCH=i386 MACHINE=i386 CPUTYPE= GROFF_BIN_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin GROFF_FONT_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/share/groff_font GROFF_TMAC_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/share/tmac PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/games:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/games:/tmp/install.uV1yfKEs /usr/obj/usr/src/make.i386/make -f Makefile.inc1 reinstall awk: Permission denied "/usr/src/Makefile.inc1", line 101: warning: "awk '/^#define[[:space:]]*__FreeBSD_version/ { print $3 }' /usr/include/osreldate.h" returned non-zero status echo:Permission denied *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. This is FreeBSD 6.3-PRERELEASE (just installed new kernel...) I'm wondering why do I get this error? -- Joe Demeny From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 19:48:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFD4116A469 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:48:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F2113C448 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:48:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.robillard@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so2088770rvb.43 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:48:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=QZTkZOpu7JGO6tQsfkxGGEYoJcmUzktSQyRzr94JrRA=; b=r6SXYspNX1Y/AjEagKpH6zRGd/WNj3dvopQS9eaTfWxBjEbe5hstOd6O7yYsvDBlNpoMf/J3ORjNFtDHK6y7uRIdPz118cRACzJYIi6ukV47ThNxtVQucuY/hpQh41DIHLY8fYZfU8MUs2CrFOy/E8pc0v/tRQdzGy+KN6fL3yA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=LOWC3vo79xU+MHYtQr10OTofo51vAFkdu+eJkkixnoaKZzy2ucmXAepzfQhD3d8ziKBxb66V6irYTdY1xrz25Pa+aweUcjf350Y6XU4OxNsJbtUYR9wf/JbLsxC64QXcEVQEu31IdSY0zN4q6w+ay4WZzIfBTRsE48Dy88FxVWY= Received: by 10.141.178.5 with SMTP id f5mr4699994rvp.286.1200944926991; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:48:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.186.16 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:48:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <226ae0c60801211148j315a62f4wfa8e53ba491963bd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:48:46 -0500 From: "David Robillard" To: "Robert Fitzpatrick" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: compiling kernel with PAE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:48:48 -0000 > Getting an error when trying to compile a kernel on 5.4 and 6.2 with the > PAE option. I've tried NO_MODULES in make.conf as well... > > se2 -ffreestanding -Werror /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c > /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c: In function `adv_action': > /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c:260: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WEBTENT. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > > This is a custom kernel build with the QUOTA option, I take out the PAE > option and all makes fine. I did a src-all update with RELENG_VER tag > prior to building. I assume this is a driver issue compatible with PAE? > > Also, can I run amd64 release on this Intel Xeon dual proc with 6GB RAM? > Thinking about loading 6.3 amd64 if possible. Excuse my ignorance, I am > not a hardware guy, I am a programmer. > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz (3000.12-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 > Features=0xbfebfbff MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > Features2=0x641d> > AMD Features=0x20100000 > Logical CPUs per core: 2 According to http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64.html the Intel Xeon (3000-sequence, 5000-sequence, and 7000-sequence) processors use the Intel(R)64 architecture. Therefore if your Intel Xeon is in the 3000-sequence, 5000-sequence or 7000-sequence, then you can use FreeBSD/amd64 and use the memory above 4Gb. IMHO it should be more simple and efficient than compiling a kernel with PAE support. HTH, David -- David Robillard UNIX systems administrator & Oracle DBA CISSP, RHCE & Sun Certified Security Administrator Montreal: +1 514 966 0122 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 19:49:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC9616A46C for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:49:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from fmailhost06.isp.att.net (fmailhost06.isp.att.net [207.115.11.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F4E13C447 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:49:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pprocacci@datapipe.com) Received: from nat.myhome.net (adsl-156-5-36.bna.bellsouth.net[70.156.5.36]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc06) with SMTP id <20080121194906H0600d7u3le>; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:49:06 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [70.156.5.36] Received: (qmail 57353 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2008 19:49:28 -0000 Received: from 2.21.5.10.in-addr.arpa (10.5.21.2) by 1.21.5.10.in-addr.arpa with QMQP; 21 Jan 2008 19:49:28 -0000 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:49:22 -0600 From: Paul Procacci To: Joe Demeny Message-ID: <20080121194921.GA48528@procacci.kicks-ass.org> References: <200801211349.11860.jd1987@borozo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200801211349.11860.jd1987@borozo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make installworld failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:49:07 -0000 Do you have any partitions mounted with noexec? I just got a very similar problem and it was due to me having /tmp mounted with noexec. On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 01:49:11PM -0500, Joe Demeny wrote: > After building world and kernel, installed kernel, but got an error when I > tried make installworld: > > # make installworld > mkdir -p /tmp/install.uV1yfKEs > for prog in [ awk cap_mkdb cat chflags chmod chown date echo egrep find grep > install-info ln lockf make mkdir mtree mv pwd_mkdb rm sed sh sysctl test > true uname wc zic; do cp `which $prog` /tmp/install.uV1yfKEs; done > cd /usr/src; MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX=/usr/obj MACHINE_ARCH=i386 MACHINE=i386 > CPUTYPE= GROFF_BIN_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin > GROFF_FONT_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/share/groff_font > GROFF_TMAC_PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/share/tmac > PATH=/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/games:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/sbin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin:/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/games:/tmp/install.uV1yfKEs /usr/obj/usr/src/make.i386/make -f > Makefile.inc1 reinstall > awk: Permission denied > "/usr/src/Makefile.inc1", line 101: > warning: "awk '/^#define[[:space:]]*__FreeBSD_version/ { print > $3 }' /usr/include/osreldate.h" returned non-zero status > echo:Permission denied > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > > This is FreeBSD 6.3-PRERELEASE (just installed new kernel...) > > I'm wondering why do I get this error? > > -- > Joe Demeny > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 19:53:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E0416A41A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:53:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rjhjr@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao102.cox.net (eastrmmtao102.cox.net [68.230.240.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5C513C45B for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:53:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rjhjr@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao102.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080121195322.UKTM26354.eastrmmtao102.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:53:22 -0500 Received: from localhost ([68.230.186.138]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id fvse1Y00F2zbV0s0000000; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:52:38 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:53:21 -0500 From: Bob Hall To: User Questions Message-ID: <20080121195321.GA66385@kongemord.krig.net> Mail-Followup-To: Bob Hall , User Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: xorg-drivers-7.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:53:23 -0000 I'm trying to update xorg-drivers-7.3 on an old machine. I didn't know that the i810 drivers do the job of the i740 drivers, so I selected i740 in the config screen when I ran portmanager. Unfortunately, this conflicts with i810, and unfortunately, this choice I made is preserved in some configuration data hidden somewhere. When I try to redo it, it picks up my previous choice instead of giving me the option of making a new choice. Found saved configuration for xorg-drivers-7.3_1 portupgrade and "Make distclean" followed by "Make" both give this message. I've tried searching, but the key words I use aren't getting me any information. What do I do to deselect i740, or to force portmanager to let me reselect my options? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 19:56:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAE9016A421 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl (smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl [213.51.130.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7677213C47E for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from [213.51.130.190] (port=59150 helo=smtp1.groni1.gr.home.nl) by smtpq2.groni1.gr.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JH2lH-0004pm-QK; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:56:51 +0100 Received: from cp268254-a.landg1.lb.home.nl ([84.25.65.88]:4945 helo=ra.egypt.nl) by smtp1.groni1.gr.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JH2lF-0000o8-UA; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:56:51 +0100 Received: from [192.168.13.53] (unknown [192.168.13.53]) by ra.egypt.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDA83988E; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:56:49 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4794F901.1050009@boosten.org> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:56:49 +0100 From: Peter Boosten User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Hall , User Questions References: <20080121195321.GA66385@kongemord.krig.net> In-Reply-To: <20080121195321.GA66385@kongemord.krig.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) Cc: Subject: Re: xorg-drivers-7.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:56:53 -0000 Bob Hall wrote: > I'm trying to update xorg-drivers-7.3 on an old machine. I didn't know > that the i810 drivers do the job of the i740 drivers, so I selected i740 > in the config screen when I ran portmanager. Unfortunately, this > conflicts with i810, and unfortunately, this choice I made is preserved > in some configuration data hidden somewhere. When I try to redo it, it > picks up my previous choice instead of giving me the option of making a > new choice. > > Found saved configuration for xorg-drivers-7.3_1 > > portupgrade and "Make distclean" followed by "Make" both give this > message. > > I've tried searching, but the key words I use aren't getting me any > information. What do I do to deselect i740, or to force portmanager to > let me reselect my options? make config :-) Greetings, Peter -- http://www.boosten.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 20:04:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFCD216A419 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:04:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perlcat@alltel.net) Received: from ispmxmta05-srv.windstream.net (ispmxmta05-srv.windstream.net [166.102.165.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797E013C46A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:04:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perlcat@alltel.net) Received: from ispmxaamta04-gx.windstream.net ([72.37.126.109]) by ispmxmta05-srv.windstream.net with ESMTP id <20080121200358.UTB5911.ispmxmta05-srv.windstream.net@ispmxaamta04-gx.windstream.net> for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:03:58 -0600 Received: from ext-b14-109.omhq.uprr.com ([72.37.126.109]) by ispmxaamta04-gx.windstream.net with ESMTP id <20080121200358.UJBL7087.ispmxaamta04-gx.windstream.net@ext-b14-109.omhq.uprr.com> for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:03:58 -0600 Content-Disposition: inline From: perlcat Organization: dis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:00:33 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200801211400.33730.perlcat@alltel.net> Subject: bind: Can't assign requested address using ssh (or anything else) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:04:08 -0000 Trying to access a vpn using ssh on 6.2 - STABLE. Haven't found an answer anywhere, and so I must be totally missing the right questions to ask or configurations to look at. This problem is consistent regardless of port chosen or access method. I can duplicate at will with ssh. Here's the command that fails: $ ssh -X -N -L 127.0.0.3:13390:192.168.1.44:3390 tyson@xx.xx.xx.xx tyson@xx.xx.xx.xx's password: bind: Can't assign requested address channel_setup_fwd_listener: cannot listen to port: 13390 Could not request local forwarding. I know that it can be done -- the guy next to me is working using Linux, but his answer to this issue was to edit the /etc/network/interfaces file. He figures that I didn't have one or don't have the loopback started. (his interfaces file): ~$ more /etc/network/interfaces auto lo iface lo inet loopback address 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 Here's my config info: ====================================== ifconfig output: smedley# ifconfig fwe0: flags=108802 mtu 1500 options=8 ether 02:e0:b8:02:9c:8e ch 1 dma -1 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 ath0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 72.37.126.77 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 72.37.126.255 ether 00:13:f7:35:39:5e media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (OFDM/18Mbps) status: associated ssid UPRR_X channel 8 bssid 00:0f:90:7b:60:00 authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpowmax 36 bmiss 7 protmode CTS burst bintval 100 ====================================== rc.conf: hostname="smedley.alltel.net" ifconfig_ath0="DHCP" inetd_enable="YES" keymap="us.iso" moused_enable="YES" linux_enable="YES" sshd_enable="YES" tcp_extensions="YES" usbd_enable="YES" nfs_client_enable="YES" cupsd_enable="YES" smartd_enable="YES" ====================================== Maybe I need to get rid if the inet6 for the loopback? Thanks! Tyson _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 20:08:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E55716A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7DF13C43E for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0LK63ik014485; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:06:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m0LK620F014484; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:06:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:06:02 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Mario Lobo Message-ID: <20080121200601.GA14429@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20080120161831.L62033@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080121165551.GB50246@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080121170504.GA73013@cheddar.urgle.com> <200801211419.54729.mlobo@digiart.art.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200801211419.54729.mlobo@digiart.art.br> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fixing a USB disk to a specific device name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:08:51 -0000 On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 02:19:54PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote: > On Monday 21 January 2008 14:05:04 Mike Bristow wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 05:55:51PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 08:56:32AM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: > > > >> It is possible, but not as daX. Use the glabel(8) utility to label > > > >> your disks. They will show up as /dev/label/ > > > > > > On 7.0-PRERELEASE, 'options GEOM_LABEL' is built into of the GENERIC > > > kernel, so it shouldn't be necessary there. > > > > Note that you can use UFS (and other filesystems labeling) too: for > > example. 'newfs -L bobs_disk' will cause the device containing it to appear > > as /dev/ufs/bobs_disk. > > > > This approach may be better for removable disks; it'll play better with > > other OSs, for example. > > I simply put > > /dev/da0s1 /PenDrive msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 > > on fstab. After I plug it in, I type > > mount /PenDrive. In KDE, I use Kwikdisk to mount it. Maybe I am missing something, but I don't think that is what the OP was asking - just a mount moiunt. I think the OP wants the /dev/da0s1 to always be /dev/da0s1 even if he switches the drives around in physical drive slots. ////jerry > > Mario Lobo > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 20:15:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B9516A41B for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:15:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chess@chessgriffin.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89ADE13C457 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:15:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chess@chessgriffin.com) Received: from [192.168.1.40] (unknown [24.199.214.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126D1D0501; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:15:39 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4794FD57.1040909@chessgriffin.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:15:19 -0500 From: Chess Griffin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Hall , User Questions References: <20080121195321.GA66385@kongemord.krig.net> In-Reply-To: <20080121195321.GA66385@kongemord.krig.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig949D74083173278FFA3F8C42" Cc: Subject: Re: xorg-drivers-7.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:15:41 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig949D74083173278FFA3F8C42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bob Hall wrote: > I'm trying to update xorg-drivers-7.3 on an old machine. I didn't know > that the i810 drivers do the job of the i740 drivers, so I selected i74= 0 > in the config screen when I ran portmanager. Unfortunately, this > conflicts with i810, and unfortunately, this choice I made is preserved= > in some configuration data hidden somewhere. When I try to redo it, it > picks up my previous choice instead of giving me the option of making a= > new choice.=20 >=20 > Found saved configuration for xorg-drivers-7.3_1 >=20 > portupgrade and "Make distclean" followed by "Make" both give this > message. >=20 > I've tried searching, but the key words I use aren't getting me any > information. What do I do to deselect i740, or to force portmanager to > let me reselect my options? See section 4.5.2.3 of the Handbook. HTH- Chess --=20 Chess Griffin GPG Key: 0x0C7558C3 http://www.chessgriffin.com --------------enig949D74083173278FFA3F8C42 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHlP1aKzd9mAx1WMMRAq1XAJ9RTYcCalRhw9nNwaIWGIt3tgBarwCdGhSl lSLdfwqHuBJO0C5L1zAPFa8= =gN2B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig949D74083173278FFA3F8C42-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 20:59:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C211D16A418 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:59:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB7C13C442 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:59:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-25-183.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.25.183]:58432 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JH3jb-0006fj-8X for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:59:12 +0100 Received: (qmail 53977 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2008 21:59:08 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2008 21:59:08 +0100 Received: (qmail 94585 invoked by uid 1001); 21 Jan 2008 21:59:08 +0100 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:59:08 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sd=E4vtaker?= Message-ID: <20080121205908.GA63780@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sd=E4vtaker?= , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080121155947.GA62290@owl.midgard.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Originating-IP: 83.253.25.183 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JH3jb-0006fj-8X. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1JH3jb-0006fj-8X 531e6618b457b7d9edb8f966d301330a Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RLT8139d drivers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:59:13 -0000 On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 03:08:03PM -0300, Sd=E4vtaker wrote: > It doesnt appear in pciconf (output is pasted below). I removed it and > tryed make it work in a winxp machine and it was successfully working, > so is not hardware problem (at least not in the nic). > Any idea why is not working?, the card chip says "8139d", my kernel is > release generic. > Is it the none0? > thanks for reply me :-) Yes, it looks very much like the "none0" entry is your NIC. That particular chip-id (0x81391904) is not one that is currently recognized by the rl(4) driver, which is why the driver is not attaching to the card. Most likely all that is needed to make work is to add that id to the list of chips the rl(4) driver is supposed to attach to, but this requires modifying the kernel source code and rebuilding the kernel. Most likely the following quick, dirty, and ugly patch would suffice to make it work, but since I do not have such a card I cannot test that it works: Index: sys/pci/if_rl.c =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D RCS file: /ncvs/src/sys/pci/if_rl.c,v retrieving revision 1.152.2.8 diff -u -r1.152.2.8 if_rl.c --- sys/pci/if_rl.c 2 Dec 2007 08:54:59 -0000 1.152.2.8 +++ sys/pci/if_rl.c 21 Jan 2008 20:55:24 -0000 @@ -176,6 +176,8 @@ "LevelOne FPC-0106TX" }, { EDIMAX_VENDORID, EDIMAX_DEVICEID_EP4103DL, RL_8139, "Edimax EP-4103DL CardBus" }, + { 0x1904, RT_DEVICEID_8139, RL_8139, + "Unknown 8139 10/100BaseTX" }, { 0, 0, 0, NULL } }; =20 =20 >=20 > pciconf -lv > agp0@pci0:0:0: class=3D0x060000 card=3D0x00001106 chip=3D0x31231106 rev= =3D0x00 hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'VIA Technologies Inc' > device =3D 'VT8623 Apollo CLE266 CastleRock CPU to PCI Bridge' > class =3D bridge > subclass =3D HOST-PCI > pcib1@pci0:1:0: class=3D0x060400 card=3D0x00000080 chip=3D0xb0911106 rev= =3D0x00 hdr=3D0x01 > vendor =3D 'VIA Technologies Inc' > device =3D 'VT8633 Apollo Pro 266 CPU to AGP Controller' > class =3D bridge > subclass =3D PCI-PCI > none0@pci0:8:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x00000000 chip=3D0x81391904 rev= =3D0x01 hdr=3D0x00 > class =3D network > subclass =3D ethernet > uhci0@pci0:16:0: class=3D0x0c0300 card=3D0x30381106 chip=3D0x30381= 106 > rev=3D0x80 hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'VIA Technologies Inc' > device =3D 'VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (All VIA Chipsets)' > class =3D serial bus > subclass =3D USB > uhci1@pci0:16:1: class=3D0x0c0300 card=3D0x30381106 chip=3D0x30381= 106 > rev=3D0x80 hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'VIA Technologies Inc' > device =3D 'VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (All VIA Chipsets)' > class =3D serial bus > subclass =3D USB > uhci2@pci0:16:2: class=3D0x0c0300 card=3D0x30381106 chip=3D0x30381= 106 > rev=3D0x80 hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'VIA Technologies Inc' > device =3D 'VT82xxxxx UHCI USB 1.1 Controller (All VIA Chipsets)' > class =3D serial bus > subclass =3D USB > ehci0@pci0:16:3: class=3D0x0c0320 card=3D0x31041106 chip=3D0x31041= 106 > rev=3D0x82 hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'VIA Technologies Inc' > device =3D 'VT6202 USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller' > class =3D serial bus > subclass =3D USB > isab0@pci0:17:0: class=3D0x060100 card=3D0x00001106 chip=3D0x31771= 106 > rev=3D0x00 hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'VIA Technologies Inc' > device =3D 'VT8235 PCI to ISA Bridge' > class =3D bridge > subclass =3D PCI-ISA > atapci0@pci0:17:1: class=3D0x01018a card=3D0x05711106 chip=3D0x05711= 106 > rev=3D0x06 hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'VIA Technologies Inc' > device =3D 'VT82xxxx EIDE Controller (All VIA Chipsets)' > class =3D mass storage > subclass =3D ATA > none1@pci0:17:5: class=3D0x040100 card=3D0x41611106 chip=3D0x30591= 106 > rev=3D0x50 hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'VIA Technologies Inc' > device =3D 'VT8233/33A/8235/8237 AC97 Enhanced Audio Controller' > class =3D multimedia > subclass =3D audio > none2@pci0:17:6: class=3D0x078000 card=3D0x4c211543 chip=3D0x30681= 106 > rev=3D0x80 hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'VIA Technologies Inc' > device =3D 'VT82C686/A/B,VT8233/A Modem Codec' > class =3D simple comms > vr0@pci0:18:0: class=3D0x020000 card=3D0x01021106 chip=3D0x30651106 rev= =3D0x74 hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'VIA Technologies Inc' > device =3D 'VT6102 Rhine II PCI Fast Ethernet Controller' > class =3D network > subclass =3D ethernet > none3@pci1:0:0: class=3D0x030000 card=3D0x31221106 chip=3D0x31221106 rev= =3D0x03 hdr=3D0x00 > vendor =3D 'VIA Technologies Inc' > device =3D 'VT8623 Apollo CLE266 CastleRock AGP 8X Controller' > class =3D display > subclass =3D VGA >=20 > On Jan 21, 2008 12:59 PM, Erik Trulsson wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 11:57:24AM -0300, Sd=E4vtaker wrote: > > > Hello. > > > Im running FBSD 6.2release. > > > I got an old RLT 8139 1/10m working in my ia32 pc, used it for long > > > time and wanted to buy a second one for routing, couldnt find one of > > > those, and bought a 10/100/1000 rlt8139d, FBSD is not detecting it, i > > > was googling and found out that 8139c+ drivers are not compatible > > > with the old drivers. > > > Is there any way to make it work? > > > Thanks for any help. > > > Sdav > > > > The RTL8139D is a 10/100Mbit chip that is supported by the rl(4) driver= and > > can be found on the majority of really cheap NICs these days, > > The RTL8169/8169S is a 10/100/1000Mbit chip that is supported by the re= (4) driver > > and is quite common on cheap gigabit-NICs. > > The RTL8139C+ (which is not the same as the RTL8139C or RTL8139D) is a > > 10/100M chip which is also supported by the re(4) driver. > > > > If FreeBSD cannot detect your NIC then you will have to send more > > information to help people figure out what exact hardware you have > > and what would be needed to make it work. > > > > The output of 'pciconf -lv' should be a good start. (Include the full > > output, not just the lines you think are important.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Erik Trulsson > > ertr1013@student.uu.se > > >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Sd=E4vtaker prays to Rikku goddess for a good treasure. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" --=20 Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 20:45:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00BA16A41A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:45:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd_love@mail.ru) Received: from mx28.mail.ru (mx28.mail.ru [194.67.23.67]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A52613C442 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:45:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd_love@mail.ru) Received: from f63.mail.ru (f63.mail.ru [194.67.57.97]) by mx28.mail.ru (mPOP.Fallback_MX) with ESMTP id 262662FDCE5 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:09:09 +0300 (MSK) Received: from mail by f63.mail.ru with local id 1JH2x9-0004Ww-00 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:09:07 +0300 Received: from [87.117.35.35] by win.mail.ru with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:09:07 +0300 From: Free BSD To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: [87.117.35.35] Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:09:07 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:06:17 +0000 Cc: Subject: License Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Free BSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:45:06 -0000 Hello, i have a question about licensing FreeBSD: i would be like install freebsd in corporation on workstation (don't servers). Its free ? Or FreeBSD free for individual using ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 21:09:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDAB16A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:09:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from administration@techntaboodle.com) Received: from smtpauth05.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpauth05.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 06FC613C469 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:09:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from administration@techntaboodle.com) Received: (qmail 6507 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2008 20:42:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (63.139.106.146) by smtpauth05.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.99) with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2008 20:42:35 -0000 From: "Zachary Welch" To: Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:42:21 -0500 Organization: Tech N' Taboodle Message-ID: <004101c85c6e$22999e70$7f01a8c0@Zacktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Achcbh6F8JxbTFFUSZqzwmsZCAFNdQ== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Mail server questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: administration@techntaboodle.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:09:21 -0000 Hello to all, BSD newbie here, running 6.2 on a core 2 quad system I built. I'm Trying to get a secure mail server going and running into some snags: First things first - After installing postfix (which seems to work when testing) and cyrus-sasl2, I opted for the Maildir/ config option in my main.cf but no ~/user/Maildir/ was every created. I also installed Dovecot IMAP and Procmail as I continued in the process thinking they might pick up the slack. Still no generated Maildir/. When I try to check /var/spool/mail, there are also no user folders present. Was there a step in the process I missed? Everything was installed from a freshly cvsup'd and portsnap'd ports tree with no compile errors to speak of. Zachary J Welch President Tech N' Taboodle 2081 E. Henrietta Rd Rochester NY 14623 www.techntaboodle.com 585-732-1952 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 21:13:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B7916A41B for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:13:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E33C13C459 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:13:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so3181143pyb.10 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:13:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0SZaAVZ1vxbNFSCM/lEdyk/ao8FtT7V8zDarwIphfMk=; b=UhMTX6ppVGI1LAZss/vhz1qU6usYQNcKTLLdNTKnNRxGnrLeExw98wXEciyrZ9PAlkMiO7d0It0//P6YMqH99/1FOFi0uOo3S0+M3g2UpVocd1ghJkjuGvkZiIG3V5GzNLUTMfFRfJyHEdH2oRhA3+6gvXL0uHup54woFPslCwc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=O3vDp6cp2/p2JwqflB9v9w9V3PzuF0QhVu763z0nKJUbZpswNlxBOBPtzqzFpf5wp1w7LFubGoozgZGbKIXBxI2m269GNSd+EtZ86WWVrC/q6JNWpq7mg8i5JDs5XgECLEWlmsfdlvGrBsT2X3jbXq7HzVIBt9YZxswoM3EXrGE= Received: by 10.65.240.17 with SMTP id s17mr15792932qbr.74.1200950007605; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:13:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz ( [67.85.89.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e15sm5887417qbe.2.2008.01.21.13.13.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:13:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47950AF5.80503@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:13:25 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080117) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Free BSD References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: License Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:13:29 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Free BSD wrote: > Hello, i have a question about licensing FreeBSD: i would be like > install freebsd in corporation on workstation (don't servers). Its > free ? Or FreeBSD free for individual using ? Yes -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHlQr1Qi2hk2LEXBARAv2zAJ4t+ELEXWBG96O1A+3MnUUF3SGmLgCggDEC Yarj3kpD8R1qweFtiFdhrIQ= =Gv5K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 21:15:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F3E16A419 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:15:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C75E13C468 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:15:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so380671nfb.33 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:15:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=blGA6iwYyNbYUzCj6sjxqzLjIBECxVrEQz1iadQ679M=; b=gtSgT2cLtTYDKoynXZK3kMQWmo7+YGSOd5JSNdeDDyMYhgfsduYIYC3ZSP+tE35bqIavgf6Si/yYgd5/fPUwXaC7AELJ85dClRKoeDcyin3DA+P3V+bHEXIMiMASXd4HAzQ63JVwjPrsyRfDT1jgrwfuZjP16qFyYIOOXEyxVzA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VjugOOkysuoK/70xhvNq+WSqNBSBPlnPfvwlQsEZsL573au0rJUdBR8okUZE6CmRbJ9w0OWN17pno1cC6zq18ATwWK2NOhfjGdF03/3PXQmA5gv+7RSaBME3vbfwKbDtEL7+BHS6cLAXYUCIra60nfvJzSn5BcFYSDMl3FUgx0s= Received: by 10.78.168.1 with SMTP id q1mr9900694hue.76.1200950128148; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:15:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:15:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801211315x44f7c8f1m46e1c518ed7fb3f9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:15:28 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" In-Reply-To: <47950AF5.80503@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47950AF5.80503@gmail.com> Cc: Free BSD , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: License Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:15:30 -0000 Hello, 2008/1/21, Aryeh M. Friedman : > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Free BSD wrote: > > Hello, i have a question about licensing FreeBSD: i would be like > > install freebsd in corporation on workstation (don't servers). Its > > free ? Or FreeBSD free for individual using ? > > Yes Funny but this answer may not be helpful :) "Yes" meaning "free for corporate environment" or "free for individuals"? Kind regards, Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 21:18:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 955B916A418 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:18:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-27.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-27.bluehost.com [69.89.17.193]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A19113C44B for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:18:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 25663 invoked by uid 0); 21 Jan 2008 21:18:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by mailproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 21 Jan 2008 21:18:35 -0000 Received: from c-24-9-123-251.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.9.123.251] helo=demeter.hydra) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JH42M-00081J-Sa for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:18:35 -0700 Received: by demeter.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:18:33 -0700 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:18:33 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080121211833.GC74902@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <94136a2c0801180110v2e43ea2esc96393c4c3ca56f@mail.gmail.com> <479077FC.6040001@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <479077FC.6040001@gmx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.com} {sentby:smtp auth 24.9.123.251 authed with perrin@apotheon.com} Subject: Re: FBSD or PCBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:18:35 -0000 On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 10:57:16AM +0100, Frank Staals wrote: > Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > >Hello, > > > >I have a basic Acer Aspire with Vista on it but I am very unhappy > >about the speed of work on it. I do not want to wipe out MS system (at > >least not yet) but would like to give FreeBSD or PCBSD a try. > > > >1. Am I safe by installing FreeBSD alongside Vista? Will the > >installation not destroy MS system? > > > Just make sure you have free space and go. You probably want to use the > FreeBSD Bootmanager but I'm not 100% sure about that ( Only running a > dualboot system with FreeBSD and WinXP for which the FreeBSD bootmanager > is required ) This should be emphasized more: Make absolutely certain you already have free space on your drive before trying to install a FreeBSD or PC-BSD OS on the system to dual-boot with an already existing MS Windows OS. This can be accomplished in a number of ways -- you'll probably want to use a LiveCD with partition resizing software (like QtParted, for instance). Knoppix comes with this software. Before resizing partitions, though, make sure you defrag your MS Windows drive so the data on it will be packed toward the beginning of the drive rather than spread across the end of it. If you cut into data on the partition when resizing, you could lose the data. If the data's important to the OS, this could hose the OS. Once you have the free space, though, installing into that free space is a cake walk. > >2. I have installed FreeBSD a few times but only with console access, > >never with X windows. Would it be better to install PCBSD on the Acer > >machine? I have never configured X windows and not sure how long it > >could take with FreeBSD (actually I mean things like Gnome or KDE). > > > Depends on your needs. If you are planning on running an other WM/DE > than KDE (Or at least I thought PCBSD came with KDE by default ) and you > are familliar with the ports system you are better off choosing > FreeBSD. Setting up X is a piece of cake nowadays. In most cases Xorg > wil generate it's own configfile at start and you don't realy have to > worry about it. If something doesn't work or you want to configure it > somehow you can just run 'Xorg --configure' which wil generate a > configfile you can edit by hand. On the other hand if you are completely > new to FreeBSD, the portsystem etc than I guess you're better off > installing PCBSD. Someone else in this discussion said something about it taking days to set up a complete GUI environment if installing from source. For me, it took less than an hour. Of course, I didn't install KDE, either -- it all depends on how much junk you have to install to consider it a "complete" GUI environment. PC-BSD is a very straightforward install, generally. So is DesktopBSD for that matter. Part of the reason for this is that you don't have to make any decisions at all. The downside is that you don't get to make any decisions at all. FreeBSD has a quick-install port for GUI/desktop environments. Once you've got the FreeBSD base system installed, just do this: cd /usr/ports/misc/instant-workstation make install clean Among other things, it installs emacs, xmms, and KDE. I don't use it, though, because I'm not much of a fan of any of those three. If you like KDE, though, that could be a quick way to get from zero to a usable workstation for you. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Marvin Minsky: "It's just incredible that a trillion-synapse computer could actually spend Saturday afternoon watching a football game." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 21:19:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B2516A475 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chess@chessgriffin.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 351C013C461 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chess@chessgriffin.com) Received: from [192.168.1.40] (unknown [24.199.214.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37037D0501; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:19:51 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <47950C62.1080801@chessgriffin.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:19:30 -0500 From: Chess Griffin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: administration@techntaboodle.com References: <004101c85c6e$22999e70$7f01a8c0@Zacktop> In-Reply-To: <004101c85c6e$22999e70$7f01a8c0@Zacktop> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig08716EBB312ADED6E739656B" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mail server questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:19:52 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig08716EBB312ADED6E739656B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Zachary Welch wrote: > Hello to all, >=20 > =20 >=20 > BSD newbie here, running 6.2 on a core 2 quad system I built.=20 >=20 > =20 >=20 > I'm Trying to get a secure mail server going and running into some snag= s: >=20 > =20 >=20 > First things first - After installing postfix (which seems to work when= > testing) and cyrus-sasl2, I opted for the Maildir/ config option in my > main.cf but no ~/user/Maildir/ was every created. I also installed Dove= cot > IMAP and Procmail as I continued in the process thinking they might pic= k up > the slack. Still no generated Maildir/. When I try to check /var/spool/= mail, > there are also no user folders present. Was there a step in the process= I > missed? Everything was installed from a freshly cvsup'd and portsnap'd = ports > tree with no compile errors to speak of. IIRC, I believe you have to create the Maildir directory using=20 /usr/local/bin/maildirmake. --=20 Chess Griffin GPG Key: 0x0C7558C3 http://www.chessgriffin.com --------------enig08716EBB312ADED6E739656B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHlQxlKzd9mAx1WMMRAszkAJoCTLFN8GAFqZ88EkJxbNCLSxKxMQCfc2ln vFj/c2mcvFvwiPaUYIjfRZc= =56rQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig08716EBB312ADED6E739656B-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 21:20:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21BBD16A46C for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:20:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839C313C4D9 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: (qmail 13428 invoked by uid 0); 21 Jan 2008 21:20:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (216.186.148.249) by smtp5.knology.net with SMTP; 21 Jan 2008 21:20:11 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id 1C7F62840A; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:20:11 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:20:11 -0600 From: David Kelly To: Free BSD Message-ID: <20080121212011.GA77505@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: License Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD-Questions@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:20:14 -0000 On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 11:09:07PM +0300, Free BSD wrote: > Hello, i have a question about licensing FreeBSD: i would be like > install freebsd in corporation on workstation (don't servers). Its > free ? Or FreeBSD free for individual using ? http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-license.html doesn't distinguish between individuals, corporations, hobby use, etc. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 21:26:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2F016A41B for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:26:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AA1013C45A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:26:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so3185546pyb.10 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:26:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YdTnSg5Eehz4k0C2icMZXdLYdIN1Dds7YeeMeCOIYio=; b=CHxCNIETMM7HgYhsLHdTND+7uWVCcHhbwigrjl9av5eeD/gvPtzjEzolxVIV9IxrhrafBFpTNay3j62eVbXdDC/4rYjM4GE/h08ZDKux4a9P4/RgxMpljzmvoIxitMe3sPYmNXAoOfwtO5R9KVWX6ngQXx2Ew7ypd5c4atqFcWI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hbz6FqSpq624pdooWfrXALy8BPdFfGQe8xXnfFvyrsOTdEc/HQ/InIMMkYVTHCFBAMcBgWwMfLsGrHRIQHgv6b3y48s+cOLTOglvrLjWkOLMB7l1tjUcicVcAHCWxZQ6aTNapIWtTe7fxA0a5J0iHqVJCUlwgn/H4ljAA3ZQLlw= Received: by 10.65.213.4 with SMTP id p4mr15902597qbq.7.1200950778604; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:26:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz ( [67.85.89.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q18sm5946619qbq.22.2008.01.21.13.26.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:26:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47950DF8.8040702@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:26:16 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080117) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zbigniew Szalbot References: <47950AF5.80503@gmail.com> <94136a2c0801211315x44f7c8f1m46e1c518ed7fb3f9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801211315x44f7c8f1m46e1c518ed7fb3f9@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Free BSD , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: License Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:26:20 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Hello, > > 2008/1/21, Aryeh M. Friedman : >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> >> Free BSD wrote: >>> Hello, i have a question about licensing FreeBSD: i would be >>> like install freebsd in corporation on workstation (don't >>> servers). Its free ? Or FreeBSD free for individual using ? >> Yes > > Funny but this answer may not be helpful :) "Yes" meaning "free for > corporate environment" or "free for individuals"? > The (Free)BSD license specifically allows you to use FreeBSD how ever you see fit along you don't impede someone else's right to do the same. Since FreeBSD it is self is a free download you never have to pay for it.... i.e. it is 100% "free beer"... ironically there is nothing that prevents you from repacking and selling the repacking... if you really want to know the good, bad and ugly of the BSD license vs. other ones read the recent thread "freebsd problems as I see them" in -current (and the continuation of the licensing sub-thread in my private inbx if you really want to)... please note I think the BSD license under rates the true value of the work being done but since it is clear from the above sub-thread that I am in the minority I will not debate it. - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Tool Developers Developer, not business, friendly http://www.flosoft-systems.com "Free software != Free beer" Blog: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHlQ34Qi2hk2LEXBARApIZAJ96bGRI0HzvFtD9Ds+a6KS68SZFsQCfUflM 6/3ZriQHnJFMnmNXtQiWVis= =6Dx+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 21:40:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AA4F16A41B for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SL=69ec6770@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260D913C465 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:40:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SL=69ec6770@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C31C164684 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:22:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D39D05A2 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:22:33 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:22:31 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080121212231.2dafa63c@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20080121170504.GA73013@cheddar.urgle.com> References: <20080120161831.L62033@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080120142042.GA8576@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080121085409.T1673@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080121165551.GB50246@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080121170504.GA73013@cheddar.urgle.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Fixing a USB disk to a specific device name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:40:21 -0000 On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:05:04 +0000 Mike Bristow wrote: > Note that you can use UFS (and other filesystems labeling) too: for > example. 'newfs -L bobs_disk' will cause the device containing it to > appear as /dev/ufs/bobs_disk. For an existing filesystem you'll need to use tunefs instead of newfs. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 22:35:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB0F16A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:35:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from hs-out-2122.google.com (hs-out-0708.google.com [64.233.178.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA3213C448 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:35:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by hs-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id h53so2179635hsh.11 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:35:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.212.19 with SMTP id k19mr3631947wfg.66.1200954917053; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:35:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio ( [67.189.206.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h14sm15165788wxd.26.2008.01.21.14.35.16 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:35:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:35:05 -0500 From: Gerard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080121173505.60f4743b@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <004101c85c6e$22999e70$7f01a8c0@Zacktop> References: <004101c85c6e$22999e70$7f01a8c0@Zacktop> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q User-Agent: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.3; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/HKYS8.UBTXOQJLKNRlVBwHh"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Subject: Re: Mail server questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:35:19 -0000 --Sig_/HKYS8.UBTXOQJLKNRlVBwHh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:42:21 -0500 "Zachary Welch" wrote: > BSD newbie here, running 6.2 on a core 2 quad system I built.=20 >=20 > I'm Trying to get a secure mail server going and running into some > snags: >=20 > First things first - After installing postfix (which seems to work > when testing) and cyrus-sasl2, I opted for the Maildir/ config option > in my main.cf but no ~/user/Maildir/ was every created. I also > installed Dovecot IMAP and Procmail as I continued in the process > thinking they might pick up the slack. Still no generated Maildir/. > When I try to check /var/spool/mail, there are also no user folders > present. Was there a step in the process I missed? Everything was > installed from a freshly cvsup'd and portsnap'd ports tree with no > compile errors to speak of. You might be better served posting your questions regarding Postfix and Dovecot on their respective forums. You supply no configuration documentation and since my crystal ball is out for repairs, assisting you is mostly guesswork. You should start off by supplying the output of: postconf -n dovecot -n I would hold off on using Procmail until you get the rest of the system up and running. In fact, IMHO, I would hold off on using Procmail totally. Tip: Use Postfix as your delivery agent for starters. Once the mail is getting delivered properly, integrate Dovecot into the mix. --=20 Gerard gerard@seibercom.net Winter is nature's way of saying, "Up yours." Robert Byrne --Sig_/HKYS8.UBTXOQJLKNRlVBwHh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkeVHhkACgkQ6DWTaTcTwMmZ0wCfZpiPOYI4b/PqYaUESYWNBZi+ ObkAoI9SK0OKe5SEPm41gVN3hZA3Gs9T =ZS59 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/HKYS8.UBTXOQJLKNRlVBwHh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 22:46:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA2216A41A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:46:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rjhjr@cox.net) Received: from eastrmmtao104.cox.net (eastrmmtao104.cox.net [68.230.240.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 311D913C45B for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:46:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rjhjr@cox.net) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao104.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080121224615.QSAY23675.eastrmmtao104.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net>; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:46:15 -0500 Received: from localhost ([68.230.186.138]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id fylX1Y00L2zbV0s0000000; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:45:31 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:46:15 -0500 From: Bob Hall To: Chess Griffin Message-ID: <20080121224615.GA66982@kongemord.krig.net> Mail-Followup-To: Bob Hall , Chess Griffin , User Questions References: <20080121195321.GA66385@kongemord.krig.net> <4794FD57.1040909@chessgriffin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4794FD57.1040909@chessgriffin.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: xorg-drivers-7.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:46:17 -0000 On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 03:15:19PM -0500, Chess Griffin wrote: > Bob Hall wrote: > >I'm trying to update xorg-drivers-7.3 on an old machine. I didn't know > >that the i810 drivers do the job of the i740 drivers, so I selected i740 > >in the config screen when I ran portmanager. Unfortunately, this > >conflicts with i810, and unfortunately, this choice I made is preserved > >in some configuration data hidden somewhere. When I try to redo it, it > >picks up my previous choice instead of giving me the option of making a > >new choice. > > > > Found saved configuration for xorg-drivers-7.3_1 > > > >portupgrade and "Make distclean" followed by "Make" both give this > >message. > > > >I've tried searching, but the key words I use aren't getting me any > >information. What do I do to deselect i740, or to force portmanager to > >let me reselect my options? > > See section 4.5.2.3 of the Handbook. Thank you. Very informative. And thanks Peter Boosten for giving me the precise answer. :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 21 23:41:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE7616A417 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:41:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from ns1.kq6up.org (adsl-76-238-148-145.dsl.irvnca.sbcglobal.net [76.238.148.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BB013C467 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([192.168.1.2]) by ns1.kq6up.org (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0LNfFb6049830 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:41:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@chrismaness.com) Message-ID: <47952D9A.7010109@chrismaness.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:41:14 -0800 From: Chris Maness User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: rsync and the mail spool? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:41:17 -0000 If I am cutting over a server, that has been created from a dump image of another server. Can I just rsync the mail spool to sync the mail at the time of cut over? Or will this cause problems? Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 00:00:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C7F16A475 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:00:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff@wildernessfringe.com) Received: from aquarius.lunarpages.com (aquarius.lunarpages.com [209.200.244.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B698D13C4D5 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:00:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeff@wildernessfringe.com) Received: from [205.217.32.52] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by aquarius.lunarpages.com with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JH6Jc-0007me-7K for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:44:32 -0800 Message-ID: <47952D9C.8040703@wildernessfringe.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:41:16 -0800 From: Jeff Pflueger User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (Windows/20071210) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 OpenPGP: id=23B69FAF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - aquarius.lunarpages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - wildernessfringe.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: gmirror challenge X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:00:16 -0000 I have a server and am using gmirror to mirror two disks. The intent was to double my security...but my experience has been that it has generally doubled the amount of time that the server goes down! gm0s1 is the name of the mirror. The mirror is Freebsd's boot source. ad4s1 is one provider ad6s1 is another provider problems arose after a power outage. gmirror would work furiously at rebuilding ad4s1 to no avail and eventually I'd get an error like "GMIRROR provider gm0s1 destroyed" and the server would go down. I could reboot and do a little from within the system before this would happen again. So I booted FreeBSD from disk, went into FixIt mode from sysinstall, then selected the cd/dvd option and then: chroot /dist mount_devfs devfs /dev kldload geom_mirror and then gmirror clear ad4s1 (no problem, that worked) - but, unfortunately I am unable to boot off of ad4 when ad6 has its SATA cable unplugged - I think that the drive is hosed/corrupted. but, here's another problem: gmirror clear ad6s1 gives me this error: "Can't clear metadata on ad6s1: Invalid argument. Not fully done." So without the metadata cleared on ad6s1, I can't boot from it and I can't boot from ad4s1 because I suspect that it is hosed... anybody have any suggestions on how to clear the metadata of ad6s1 so I can boot from it without it going into gmirror and being unhappy? Thanks for any help! Jeff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 01:35:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F4816A41B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:35:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jwm-freebsd-questions@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB1D13C4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:35:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jwm-freebsd-questions@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2008 20:05:59 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id JOS40560; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:05:37 -0500 (EST) Received: from 207-172-209-180.c3-0.bkl-ubr2.sbo-bkl.ma.static.cable.rcn.com (HELO sentinelchicken.net) ([207.172.209.180]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2008 20:04:33 -0500 Received: (qmail 75135 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2008 01:05:33 -0000 Received: from aeryn.skepsi.net (HELO crichton.skepsi.net) (10.0.0.101) by aeryn.skepsi.net with SMTP; 22 Jan 2008 01:05:33 -0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 75132 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:05:33 -0000 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:05:33 -0500 From: Jason Morgan To: Jeff Pflueger Message-ID: <20080122010533.GA74899@sentinelchicken.net> References: <47952D9C.8040703@wildernessfringe.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47952D9C.8040703@wildernessfringe.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A010204.47954165.0067,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2007-10-30 19:00:17, dmn=5.4.3/2007-11-16 X-Junkmail-IWF: false Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gmirror challenge X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:35:05 -0000 On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 03:41:16PM -0800, Jeff Pflueger wrote: > I have a server and am using gmirror to mirror two disks. > > The intent was to double my security...but my experience has been that > it has generally doubled the amount of time that the server goes down! > > gm0s1 is the name of the mirror. The mirror is Freebsd's boot source. > ad4s1 is one provider > ad6s1 is another provider > > problems arose after a power outage. > gmirror would work furiously at rebuilding ad4s1 to no avail and > eventually I'd get an error like "GMIRROR provider gm0s1 destroyed" and > the server would go down. I could reboot and do a little from within the > system before this would happen again. > > So I booted FreeBSD from disk, went into FixIt mode from sysinstall, > then selected the cd/dvd option and then: > chroot /dist > mount_devfs devfs /dev > kldload geom_mirror > > and then gmirror clear ad4s1 > (no problem, that worked) - but, unfortunately I am unable to boot off > of ad4 when ad6 has its SATA cable unplugged - I think that the drive is > hosed/corrupted. > > but, here's another problem: > gmirror clear ad6s1 gives me this error: > "Can't clear metadata on ad6s1: Invalid argument. Not fully done." > > So without the metadata cleared on ad6s1, I can't boot from it > and I can't boot from ad4s1 because I suspect that it is hosed... > > anybody have any suggestions on how to clear the metadata of ad6s1 so I > can boot from it without it going into gmirror and being unhappy? > > Thanks for any help! > > Jeff Hey Jeff, Try: gmirror forget ad6s1 >From gmirror(8): remove Remove the given component(s) from the mirror and clear meta- data on it. and futher on: One disk failed. Replace it with a brand new one: gmirror forget data gmirror insert data da1 I had a drive do something similar --- the system wouldn't crash, but a drive just refused to be rebuilt. I used `forget' and it worked like a charm. ~Jason > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 01:55:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E6A16A417 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jwm-freebsd-questions@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3E913C447 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:55:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jwm-freebsd-questions@sentinelchicken.net) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2008 20:55:33 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id JOS51694; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:55:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from 207-172-209-180.c3-0.bkl-ubr2.sbo-bkl.ma.static.cable.rcn.com (HELO sentinelchicken.net) ([207.172.209.180]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 21 Jan 2008 20:54:27 -0500 Received: (qmail 75861 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2008 01:55:27 -0000 Received: from aeryn.skepsi.net (HELO crichton.skepsi.net) (10.0.0.101) by aeryn.skepsi.net with SMTP; 22 Jan 2008 01:55:27 -0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 75858 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:55:27 -0000 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 20:55:27 -0500 From: Jason Morgan To: Jeff Pflueger Message-ID: <20080122015527.GB74899@sentinelchicken.net> References: <47952D9C.8040703@wildernessfringe.com> <20080122010533.GA74899@sentinelchicken.net> <47954872.3050200@wildernessfringe.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47954872.3050200@wildernessfringe.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net X-Junkmail-SD-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A010201.47954D15.007C,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=207.172.4.11, so=2007-10-30 19:00:17, dmn=5.4.3/2007-11-16 X-Junkmail-IWF: false Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gmirror challenge X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:55:34 -0000 On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 05:35:46PM -0800, Jeff Pflueger wrote: > > > Hey Jeff, > > > > Try: > > > > gmirror forget ad6s1 > > > > >From gmirror(8): > > > > remove Remove the given component(s) from the mirror and clear meta- > > data on it. > > > > and futher on: > > > > One disk failed. Replace it with a brand new one: > > > > gmirror forget data > > gmirror insert data da1 > > > > > > I had a drive do something similar --- the system wouldn't crash, but > > a drive just refused to be rebuilt. I used `forget' and it worked like > > a charm. > > > > ~Jason > > > Thanks for that! > turns out that if I rebuild a mirror once booted from cd via: > gmirror label -v -b load gm0s1 /dev/ad4s1 > mount /dev/mirror/gm0s1 /mnt > > then I disconnected ad6 and booted from ad4. Once booted, the disk was > very busy for a long time and now it seems to be working fine. > > However, ad6... > when I have booted from CD I can't gmirror clean ad6 without getting the > message about > > "Can't clear metadata on ad6s1: Invalid argument. Not fully done." > > I suspect that something is either mechanically wrong (less likely) or somehow corrupted on ad6... > > How can I wipe ad6 so that I can now try to insert it into the new mirror? To completely wipe the drive? Try: # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad6 bs=512 That will zero out the *whole* drive, nothing will be left. You will also need to make sure you do # gmirror forget ad6 first; otherwise, I think gmirror will expect to find metadata on the drive. Read the man page carefully to make sure you are taking the steps in the right order. Good luck, ~Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 02:10:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1172316A46B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from smtp.utwente.nl (unknown [IPv6:2001:610:1908:1000:204:23ff:feb5:7e66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7747A13C461 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:10:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter@degoeje.nl) Received: from lux.student.utwente.nl (lux.student.utwente.nl [130.89.170.81]) by smtp.utwente.nl (8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id m0M29vtS021292; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:09:57 +0100 From: Pieter de Goeje To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:09:56 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <226ae0c60801211148j315a62f4wfa8e53ba491963bd@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <226ae0c60801211148j315a62f4wfa8e53ba491963bd@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801220309.56966.pieter@degoeje.nl> X-UTwente-MailScanner-Information: Scanned by MailScanner. Contact servicedesk@icts.utwente.nl for more information. X-UTwente-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-UTwente-MailScanner-From: pieter@degoeje.nl X-Spam-Status: No Cc: David Robillard , Robert Fitzpatrick Subject: Re: compiling kernel with PAE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:10:06 -0000 On Monday 21 January 2008, David Robillard wrote: > > Getting an error when trying to compile a kernel on 5.4 and 6.2 with the > > PAE option. I've tried NO_MODULES in make.conf as well... > > > > se2 -ffreestanding -Werror /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c > > /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c: In function `adv_action': > > /usr/src/sys/dev/advansys/advansys.c:260: warning: cast from pointer to > > integer of different size *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WEBTENT. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src. > > > > This is a custom kernel build with the QUOTA option, I take out the PAE > > option and all makes fine. I did a src-all update with RELENG_VER tag > > prior to building. I assume this is a driver issue compatible with PAE? > > > > Also, can I run amd64 release on this Intel Xeon dual proc with 6GB RAM? > > Thinking about loading 6.3 amd64 if possible. Excuse my ignorance, I am > > not a hardware guy, I am a programmer. > > > > CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.00GHz (3000.12-MHz 686-class CPU) > > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 > > > > Features=0xbfebfbff >MCA,C MOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE> > > Features2=0x641d> > > AMD Features=0x20100000 Note the LM feature here: ^^ This means the CPU supports "Long Mode", which basically means the cpu supports the 64bit extensions needed for FreeBSD/amd64. > > Logical CPUs per core: 2 > > According to http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64.html the Intel > Xeon (3000-sequence, 5000-sequence, and 7000-sequence) processors use > the Intel(R)64 architecture. > Therefore if your Intel Xeon is in the 3000-sequence, 5000-sequence or > 7000-sequence, then you can use FreeBSD/amd64 and use the memory above > 4Gb. IMHO it should be more simple and efficient than compiling a > kernel with PAE support. > > HTH, > > David - Pieter de Goeje From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 03:08:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80C416A417 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:08:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB99E13C447 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:08:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so2191397rvb.43 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:08:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=xxSqu34tuF1UnhW2vINALcWPoBl32I935jFU5BqGKcU=; b=EdykywT3EeFQOQhii/p10ij9MbWuPTaw84X9w9sHc63tn664YXqQtw7okz7rk1bLIRw02odp5qvVDc/RAFPz9Ha2iNzbCQQyqxRHcqpxLQAzi3Qc8L2hhDqIJyRN+CWzLpnNHhPJJ60YiMaX/8fU3mUrN4YqTMLS5tLwMleYGNE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OSJrUkhRySvJeM3gtJUGkBZ7UT3UraMGd0yrwZHu6857f/8IhnePD5I2P3f4ckdHC5adSUjtZL2riNYRL2RKqD+FAW5IM7fd9//1YbPjy4AvAqMlxSZrJoZ8Qf7ewELn+dXsWPhlYM36LpQO+5Pu+NTv2cPR/nnEyylT0G/B0Zg= Received: by 10.141.115.6 with SMTP id s6mr5004480rvm.4.1200971289199; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:08:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.142.18 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:08:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54db43990801211908j6f46d5a5xbbe51128c4ce54eb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:08:09 -0500 From: "Bob Johnson" To: Schiz0 In-Reply-To: <8d23ec860801211012j60d3eb39x19e3076f3b608338@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8d23ec860801091038i4878b8b1lbfbacbd8a4dbac73@mail.gmail.com> <8d23ec860801211012j60d3eb39x19e3076f3b608338@mail.gmail.com> Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: Boot Loader Broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:08:11 -0000 On 1/21/08, Schiz0 wrote: > On Jan 9, 2008 1:38 PM, Schiz0 wrote: [...] > > Now, I'm even in a bigger hole. My power died this weekend, and I > guess the / partition has some errors on it, so it is being mounted > read-only. But I'm unable to get into single user mode. I tried > "shutdown now" and "init 1" and they both brought me back to the > multi-user login prompt. And there's no menu to reboot and select > single user mode from. What do you mean by "multi-user login prompt"? > > Can someone help me either solve the bootloader problem, or just how > to get into single user mode? When you reboot the system (e.g. press ctrl-alt-delete or issued the "shutdown -r now" command), it should present a boot menu with numbered choices. What happens if you select the one corresponding to "boot in single user mode". Or do you never get to the menu? If you never got that menu, you are almost certainly in single-user mode. Is there anything in /boot/loader.conf ? - Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 03:55:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FAA516A41B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:55:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C80B13C455 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:55:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0M3tEFH091161 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:55:14 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.6/8.12.11) id m0M3tEYH047190; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:55:14 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:55:14 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200801220355.m0M3tEYH047190@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Subject: Postfix quota per virtual domain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:55:17 -0000 Hello, I am working on a Postfix email server for virtual domain. I was requested to implement quota per domain, not per user, have you ever seen something like that? Best regards, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 03:58:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3B216A419 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:58:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7C513C458 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:58:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id OAA07538; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:58:14 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:58:13 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Tijl Coosemans In-Reply-To: <20080121180417.5841A16A468@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Andreas Davour , Wojciech Puchar , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Throttle the CPU when the system is idle X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 03:58:52 -0000 On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:54:44 +0100 Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Monday 21 January 2008 16:13:36 Andreas Davour wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > >> Throttling still made a huge difference on my systems. On my old two-speed Thinkpad, powerd nearly halves total power drawn! > > Many different opionions here. How did you do it then? > > In /etc/sysctl.conf: > debug.cpufreq.lowest=400 > > In /etc/rc.conf: > economy_cx_lowest="LOW" > performance_cx_lowest="LOW" > powerd_enable="YES" > powerd_flags="-i 92 -r 65 -p 200" The documentation on all of this could use a little expansion for those unable to locate/read the code. The BUGS section of powerd(8) states: "If powerd is used with power_profile, they may override each other." without saying what might be done about that. /etc/rc.d/power_profile is called by default (on ACPI laptops) in /etc/devd.conf like so: # Switch power profiles when the AC line state changes. notify 10 { match "system" "ACPI"; match "subsystem" "ACAD"; action "/etc/rc.d/power_profile $notify"; }; A browse of power_profile shows that using the below /etc/rc.conf values will prevent it from messing with dev.cpu.0.freq when using powerd (with notes from rc.conf on my Thinkpad T23 at 6.1-RELEASE): # 27/9/6 powerd manages cpu freq nicely, but not (yet?) CX states powerd_enable="YES" # default flags seem ok for T23 # disable power_profile management of cpu freq (fights w/ powerd) performance_cpu_freq="NONE" # Online CPU frequency economy_cpu_freq="NONE" # Offline CPU frequency # 24/9/6 power_profile still manages on/offline lowest CX state # 13/10/6 LOW value C2|C3 depends on whether booted on or offline? performance_cx_lowest="HIGH" # Online CPU idle state economy_cx_lowest="LOW" # Offline CPU idle state Andreas: Tijl's value of -p 200 (ie poll online status and idle percentage every 200ms instead of default 500ms) should help with concerns about how fast powerd ramps up frequency when load occurs. Copying Wojciech as well, as he seemed to be possibly? unaware of the difference using cx_lowest values (ie which method of halting the CPU) other than C1 can make to power consumption, and thus CPU temperature. HTH, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 04:09:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF4E16A418 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:09:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0222A13C45D for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:09:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0M49aKg091828 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:09:36 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.6/8.12.11) id m0M49ZGx047327; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:09:35 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:09:35 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200801220409.m0M49ZGx047327@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: on@cs.ait.ac.th In-reply-to: <200801220355.m0M3tEYH047190@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> (message from Olivier Nicole on Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:55:14 +0700 (ICT)) References: <200801220355.m0M3tEYH047190@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Postfix quota per virtual domain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:09:51 -0000 Hello, I am working on a Postfix email server for virtual domain. I was requested to implement quota per domain, not per user: the sum of mailboxes of all the users in the domain must not exceed the quota set for the domain. (All I could find was example where all users of the domain had a same quota amount, fixed for the domain, but each individual mailbox counts for its own quota.) Have you ever seen something like that? Best regards, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 04:14:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1641D16A417 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:14:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F3713C45A for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:14:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite ([24.166.217.200]) by hrndva-omta04.mail.rr.com with SMTP id <20080122041440.DFLV17975.hrndva-omta04.mail.rr.com@satellite> for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:14:40 +0000 Message-ID: <000301c85cad$3b3b78b0$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:14:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Subject: packaging a metaport X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:14:41 -0000 Hello, I'd like to compile and install xorg and gnome via metaports on a machine, making packages out of the entire process, including dependencies. My goal is to have a tarball that i can take to other machines, extract it and do a pkg_add * and have xorg and gnome installed via packages vs. recompiling the port. I tried a make package but that doesn't work with metaports, and make package-recursive doesn't happen either. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 05:08:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AB616A41B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:08:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitrovi58@yahoo.com) Received: from web56811.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web56811.mail.re3.yahoo.com [66.196.97.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1508B13C458 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:08:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitrovi58@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 31295 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Jan 2008 05:08:38 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=YtT99wBvNSusvQaUKAlFvgCGRy6aUqVz4Hl/mHH+PdszZUgJqO34WRN/JCOf7coBEhNyyhtN7O3pRs+uKuHyaYB2kTsNgkU/YW9LrR07qbtH/bNHABxpz5etHDulNcPLdYD52JDIO61LcPK/Ylm4Ilqscx22gYx9fDHMJ8bupF0=; X-YMail-OSG: UhkrAHMVM1nnJmNbJYoSe6X.7P34nTiZO.FXLoCN3fC7zzKXT9DbjD2KfW0Iv1V8rjA3nOa8WzioBD4JtLo884hA1h80TZp.nUgpS7KVYMuNOk5w4gM- Received: from [85.196.191.64] by web56811.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:08:38 PST Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:08:38 -0800 (PST) From: ivan dimitrov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <365643.31120.qm@web56811.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: how to restore /usr/src X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:08:39 -0000 Hi guys how can i reinstall the original /usr/src tree? thanks in advance I. --------------------------------- Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 05:19:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F24316A41A for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:19:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (dsl081-163-122.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.163.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460CB13C458 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:19:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from w16.stradamotorsports.com (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0M5JYvq075653 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:19:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <47957CEE.90607@highperformance.net> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:19:42 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd general questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=failed version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on s4.stradamotorsports.com Subject: ACPI Thermal Zone Error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:19:36 -0000 I just built a new 6.3 kernel with device acpi. I am now getting this error: acpi_tz0: _TMP value is absurd, ignored (-127.0C) Does FreeBSD ACPI functionality override the system BIOS? I am concerned about overheating my system. How can I fix this error? How can I silence it if it is really a no-op? Thanks, Jason C. Wells From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 05:32:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2BE16A417 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:32:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C4513C45A for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:32:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so2273801fgg.35 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:32:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=a1rsKoYB8Gj1WQSezWZUJ+VEKSTCtvP3jOua7yBg82Y=; b=aWoP+qMnzGlG1+OK/SHwqyDwV6OlQXSL1BwHb/31FtVbpJCM7TKd7nxvvPXuwjKpEOvLYAkFh7hgOlwyE300rAdGm/P8PZAMpcw7zD4QfCz/Mah28OyCI2PnYonW9IZnJo/NhTMCfJBQgezuRsfrs7HoKfsp3Km7egL+MzItmMM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=S3zjYyM91yEx/87yGu3SMgVdjTHIzaCcLHpsmDWi/FRs7hGTbjq++pgmqURI/A+n30caR8lEaqRE3Kph+ZMdCR7HVpkXXUBRhP5++CpYSlAWRrLPIviQPE1rF7bzcIeFi3EahjjVeFZ+K1xX1gPR4G+ob1tLAiPzQ91ovaYx/0c= Received: by 10.82.150.20 with SMTP id x20mr13973898bud.5.1200979949246; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:32:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.160.20 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:32:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <560f92640801212132q14eb068eg993fe73bf0d4755b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:32:29 -0800 From: "Nerius Landys" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <365643.31120.qm@web56811.mail.re3.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <365643.31120.qm@web56811.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: how to restore /usr/src X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:32:32 -0000 >how can i reinstall the original /usr/src Oh that's really easy. Don't fret. I delete it all the time and get it back in the following way. In the handbook, there's a section about synchronizing your source: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/synching.html Use 'cvsup' or 'csup'; if your system is newer 'csup' will be part of the system. Find your 'standard-supfile' file (probably in /usr/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile), copy it to your home directory and modify it by changing the lines *default host=CHANGE_THIS.FreeBSD.org (change 'CHANGE_THIS' to 'cvsup11.us' for example) *default release=cvs tag= (see below) and then run 'csup standard-supfile' or 'cvsup standard-supfile'. 'cvsup' is in /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui if you need to install it. CVS TAGs are explained in http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 05:45:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ECD316A419 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F2713C45B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so2276061fgg.35 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:45:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=ebiN1t5GdPbJT0OqHNQZHVPh1pTJs6SQLF4xBtxksTs=; b=RklGEN9d+iePmtGmW0muupv9NCr2e4HjlgNz73N2KIeYZXasnFVBFsZsuKlEzu6GT/7pYBVratAhoAIpJ/GB71TDmqtjSXxRD1s/TnQ1wUdwglWiaD4i8yE0/dLDgsXPQr2kHr2Ti0cwrMFxSX/K/rh/jGJfpIIxkV+HdJwGkfM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=F5z0wYgcUpxEPrRyiMcHtr2XsluhzFzUo0i7kt00iOOcfE9SbKbnpmko09xF/m2nlUZe3SQVoLUnb5+RMdhTEXlwUcfxHsM2aJCa9Y7AG4HgKWXniRlSKnYpbF6JFUzNq6wglPDQNomNIMAOF1jEtG+YyNBey1WHC4Q0mlBymMk= Received: by 10.82.107.15 with SMTP id f15mr14019872buc.0.1200980720980; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:45:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.160.20 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:45:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <560f92640801212145v58769b9bv1d08e23a9469fcc8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 21:45:20 -0800 From: "Nerius Landys" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: How do port Makefiles work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:45:23 -0000 I'm trying to figure out how a port makefile configures, makes, makes install from a source tarball. The port I'm interested in in particular is /usr/ports/x11/Terminal; I have it built and installed just fine using the ports system. Now I'm trying to tweak the source code, build, and install locally in a home directory, all without using the ports system. So, I've taken the archive Terminal-0.2.6.tar.bz2, unpacked it, and ran './configure --prefix='. Then I run 'make', and I get this error: sylvester# make make all-recursive Making all in doc Making all in C Making all in images Making all in ja Making all in images Making all in helpers make: don't know how to make balsa.desktop. Stop *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/nlandys/Terminal-0.2.6. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/home/nlandys/Terminal-0.2.6. But like I said earlier, the ports system was able to build and install successfully. So the ports build system is probably passing some arguments to 'configure', and maybe some arguments to 'make', and maybe doing some other things and calling other targets. How can I figure out how the ports system is building this package so that I can mimic it to successfully configure and make this package manually? Or, if that is not an elegant thing to do, how can I correct this make problem? In the end, I just want to build this package manually. Thanks - A newb in need of help. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 06:03:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2016A16A41A for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:03:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD88A13C43E for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:03:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so583236anc.13 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:03:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.31.3 with SMTP id e3mr16604875ane.112.1200981799943; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:03:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.102.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s40sm7460895hsb.5.2008.01.21.22.03.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:03:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from dogmatix (dogmatix [192.168.17.31]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D8711427; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:01:56 +0400 (GST) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:02:11 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com To: Jerry McAllister In-Reply-To: <20080121200601.GA14429@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Message-ID: <20080122100051.E7173@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> References: <20080120161831.L62033@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080121165551.GB50246@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080121170504.GA73013@cheddar.urgle.com> <200801211419.54729.mlobo@digiart.art.br> <20080121200601.GA14429@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> X-Blog: http://rakhesh.com/ X-Notes: http://rakhesh.net/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Cc: Mario Lobo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fixing a USB disk to a specific device name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:03:22 -0000 Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 02:19:54PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote: > >> On Monday 21 January 2008 14:05:04 Mike Bristow wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 05:55:51PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 08:56:32AM +0400, Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: >>>>>> It is possible, but not as daX. Use the glabel(8) utility to label >>>>>> your disks. They will show up as /dev/label/ >>>> >>>> On 7.0-PRERELEASE, 'options GEOM_LABEL' is built into of the GENERIC >>>> kernel, so it shouldn't be necessary there. >>> >>> Note that you can use UFS (and other filesystems labeling) too: for >>> example. 'newfs -L bobs_disk' will cause the device containing it to appear >>> as /dev/ufs/bobs_disk. >>> >>> This approach may be better for removable disks; it'll play better with >>> other OSs, for example. >> >> I simply put >> >> /dev/da0s1 /PenDrive msdosfs rw,noauto 0 0 >> >> on fstab. After I plug it in, I type >> >> mount /PenDrive. In KDE, I use Kwikdisk to mount it. > > Maybe I am missing something, but I don't think that is what the OP > was asking - just a mount moiunt. I think the OP wants the > /dev/da0s1 to always be /dev/da0s1 even if he switches the drives > around in physical drive slots. > Yup, that's what I wanted. For the drive to always appear as /dev/da0 (or anything similar). The glabel feature (and newfs labelling feature too) are exactly what I was looking for. Thanks a ton for all the replies. Much appreciated. :) Regards, - Rakhesh http://rakhesh.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 06:16:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C5EA16A417 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:16:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75DD13C442 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:16:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so583844anc.13 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:16:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.165.13 with SMTP id n13mr16693592ane.38.1200982605538; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:16:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.102.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w43sm7443794hsa.9.2008.01.21.22.16.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:16:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from dogmatix (dogmatix [192.168.17.31]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2F711427; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:15:25 +0400 (GST) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:15:41 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com To: Nerius Landys In-Reply-To: <560f92640801212132q14eb068eg993fe73bf0d4755b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080122101013.N7173@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> References: <365643.31120.qm@web56811.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <560f92640801212132q14eb068eg993fe73bf0d4755b@mail.gmail.com> X-Blog: http://rakhesh.com/ X-Notes: http://rakhesh.net/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to restore /usr/src X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:16:47 -0000 Nerius Landys wrote: >> how can i reinstall the original /usr/src If you have the install CD, you can even extract the sources from there. I don't recollect the exact location (am in office, don't have a CD with me) but its in a directory named "src" and has many files in it. These files are split archives of the original /usr/src tree. There's also a shell script called ''install.sh'' which can be run to combine all these files and extract to a specific location. By default the extracted to location is $DESTDIR/usr/src. Since you want to install to /usr/src, set $DESTDIR to /. So in effect, the following commands should extract the sources to /usr/src for you. (I assume you've inserted the FreeBSD and its mounted at some path). # cd /path/on/cd/where/sources/are # DESTDIR=/ ./install.sh all Hope that helps. - Rakhesh http://rakhesh.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 06:23:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB1D16A419 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:23:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA18A13C45A for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:23:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so584235anc.13 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:23:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.171.10 with SMTP id t10mr16628818ane.94.1200983026329; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:23:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.102.129]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y56sm7439891hsb.1.2008.01.21.22.23.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:23:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from dogmatix (dogmatix [192.168.17.31]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA9E411427; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:22:30 +0400 (GST) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:22:46 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com To: Josh Paetzel In-Reply-To: <200801211003.41984.josh@tcbug.org> Message-ID: <20080122101753.G7173@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> References: <20080120212048.J91357@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> <20080120184100.GA15880@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20080121070054.D3660@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> <200801211003.41984.josh@tcbug.org> X-Blog: http://rakhesh.com/ X-Notes: http://rakhesh.net/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GELI key from a USB disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:23:48 -0000 > If you are using /etc/rc.d/geli or geli2 what about fiddling with it's REQUIRE > so that it runs later.....like after all your filesystems are mounted? This > would seem to be an ok solution provided you aren't using geli on your OS > partitions. Yup. That seems like a possible solution. Will have a look. Thanks Josh. Regards, - Rakhesh http://rakhesh.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 07:05:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2972A16A46B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:05:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: from smtp5.wlink.com.np (smtp5.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1205A13C4D3 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 95622 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2008 06:38:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp2.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.49) by 0 with SMTP; 22 Jan 2008 06:38:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 25983 invoked by uid 98); 22 Jan 2008 06:38:32 -0000 Received: from 202.79.36.7 by smtp2.wlink.com.np (envelope-from , uid 1010) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.90.3/3492. Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.7):. Processed in 0.039608 secs); 22 Jan 2008 06:38:32 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: teklimbu@wlink.com.np via smtp2.wlink.com.np X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.7):. Processed in 0.039608 secs) Received: from [202.79.36.7] (HELO [202.79.36.7]) by smtp2.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 22 Jan 2008 06:38:07 -0000 (Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:23:07 +0545) Message-ID: <47958F26.3030704@wlink.com.np> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:22:26 +0545 From: Tek Bahadur Limbu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Check-By: smtp2.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; 0.2 / 8.0 X-Spam-Status-WL: No, hits=0.2 required=5 Cc: Subject: Need to re-generate the passwords in /etc/passwd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:05:20 -0000 Hi all, Due to some security purposes, I need to re-generate all the passwords for my users from the file /etc/passwd. There are about 500 users residing in /etc/passwd. I need a way to quickly generate new random passwords for the users using the /etc/passwd to a text file. The text file after sorting will be used to distribute the new passwords to the users. Thanking you... -- With best regards and good wishes, Yours sincerely, Tek Bahadur Limbu System Administrator (TAG/TDG Group) Jwl Systems Department Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. Jawalakhel, Nepal http://www.wlink.com.np http://teklimbu.wordpress.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 07:17:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E2016A41A for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:17:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8304613C4FA for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:17:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0M7HLx9000366 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:17:21 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.6/8.12.11) id m0M7HLjR049208; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:17:21 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:17:21 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200801220717.m0M7HLjR049208@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: teklimbu@wlink.com.np In-reply-to: <47958F26.3030704@wlink.com.np> (message from Tek Bahadur Limbu on Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:22:26 +0545) References: <47958F26.3030704@wlink.com.np> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need to re-generate the passwords in /etc/passwd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:17:24 -0000 > Due to some security purposes, I need to re-generate all the passwords > for my users from the file /etc/passwd. I use the following script to generate passwords: http://www.cs.ait.ac.th/cgi-bin/phi-soft/gen-multipasswd I could send it to you as Perl script, so you could generate 500 passwords in one run, or you call the web page enough number of times. The password is generated as a psuedo Markov chain on probability based on some pieces of English text (FreeBSD man pages). It adds at least 2 numbers, one non alpha-numerical sign and turns some letters into uppercase. At first the passwords were very English like "words", now it is more confusing. non-alpha-numerical characters are choosen to avoid conflicts with the softwares I am using it: samba, FreeBSD login, MySQL... Best regards, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 07:22:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE3416A418 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:22:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C23E13C45A for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:22:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0M7LZVQ000631 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:21:35 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.6/8.12.11) id m0M7LZo9049256; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:21:35 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:21:35 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200801220721.m0M7LZo9049256@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: on@cs.ait.ac.th In-reply-to: <200801220717.m0M7HLjR049208@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> (message from Olivier Nicole on Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:17:21 +0700 (ICT)) References: <47958F26.3030704@wlink.com.np> <200801220717.m0M7HLjR049208@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: questions@freebsd.org, teklimbu@wlink.com.np Subject: Re: Need to re-generate the passwords in /etc/passwd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:22:09 -0000 > > Due to some security purposes, I need to re-generate all the passwords > > for my users from the file /etc/passwd. > > I use the following script to generate passwords: > > http://www.cs.ait.ac.th/cgi-bin/phi-soft/gen-multipasswd Or use: http://www.cs.ait.ac.th/cgi-bin/phi-soft/gen-multipasswd2 that will give you 500 passwords. Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 07:30:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82DCC16A417 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:30:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: from smtp5.wlink.com.np (smtp5.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 781BC13C459 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:30:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 9327 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2008 07:30:23 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp1.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.76) by 0 with SMTP; 22 Jan 2008 07:30:23 -0000 Received: (qmail 92636 invoked by uid 98); 22 Jan 2008 07:30:23 -0000 Received: from 202.79.36.7 by smtp1.wlink.com.np (envelope-from , uid 1009) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.88.4/2205. Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.7):. Processed in 0.041677 secs); 22 Jan 2008 07:30:23 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: teklimbu@wlink.com.np via smtp1.wlink.com.np X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.7):. Processed in 0.041677 secs) Received: from [202.79.36.7] (HELO [202.79.36.7]) by smtp1.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 22 Jan 2008 07:30:13 -0000 (Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:15:13 +0545) Message-ID: <47959B51.8030405@wlink.com.np> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:14:21 +0545 From: Tek Bahadur Limbu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olivier Nicole References: <47958F26.3030704@wlink.com.np> <200801220717.m0M7HLjR049208@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: <200801220717.m0M7HLjR049208@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Check-By: smtp1.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; 0.2 / 8.0 X-Spam-Status-WL: No, hits=0.2 required=5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need to re-generate the passwords in /etc/passwd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:30:31 -0000 Hi Oliver, Olivier Nicole wrote: >> Due to some security purposes, I need to re-generate all the passwords >> for my users from the file /etc/passwd. > > I use the following script to generate passwords: > > http://www.cs.ait.ac.th/cgi-bin/phi-soft/gen-multipasswd How do I use the above script for my machine which I access remotely by SSH. > > I could send it to you as Perl script, so you could generate 500 > passwords in one run, or you call the web page enough number of times. That will be great! So I just run the script against /etc/passwd and presto, all the users in that file will be generated new passwords. I will need a way to pass the newly generated passwords to individuals users. > > The password is generated as a psuedo Markov chain on probability > based on some pieces of English text (FreeBSD man pages). It adds at > least 2 numbers, one non alpha-numerical sign and turns some letters > into uppercase. > > At first the passwords were very English like "words", now it is more > confusing. > > non-alpha-numerical characters are choosen to avoid conflicts with the > softwares I am using it: samba, FreeBSD login, MySQL... Sounds great! Thanks alot > > Best regards, > > Olivier > > > > -- With best regards and good wishes, Yours sincerely, Tek Bahadur Limbu System Administrator (TAG/TDG Group) Jwl Systems Department Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. Jawalakhel, Nepal http://www.wlink.com.np http://teklimbu.wordpress.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 07:36:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA6116A420 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:36:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@ridecharge.com) Received: from exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D56813C4FA for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:36:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@ridecharge.com) Received: from laptop1.p6m7g8.net (70.88.236.22) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.0.744.0; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:36:15 -0800 Message-ID: <47959CEE.60902@riderway.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:36:14 -0500 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: Riderway Inc. User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071217) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave References: <000301c85cad$3b3b78b0$0200a8c0@satellite> In-Reply-To: <000301c85cad$3b3b78b0$0200a8c0@satellite> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: packaging a metaport X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:36:17 -0000 Dave wrote: > Hello, > I'd like to compile and install xorg and gnome via metaports on a > machine, making packages out of the entire process, including dependencies. > My goal is to have a tarball that i can take to other machines, extract it > and do a pkg_add * and have xorg and gnome installed via packages vs. > recompiling the port. I tried a make package but that doesn't work with > metaports, and make package-recursive doesn't happen either. > Thanks. > Dave. $ id ftp uid=14(ftp) gid=14(ftp) groups=14(ftp) In /etc/inetd.conf ftp stream tcp nowait root /usr/libexec/ftpd ftpd -4 -A -l -l -r M -s In /etc/rc.conf inetd_flags="-wW -l -R 1024 -C 60" inetd_enable="YES" $ sudo /etc/rc.d/inetd restart In /etc/make.conf DISTDIR=/home/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles PACKAGES=/home/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-7-current (change the arch and os version to match yours) $ sudo mkdir -p /home/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles $ sudo mkdir -p /home/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-7-current $ cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg $ make all install package-recursive $ cd /usr/ports/x11-wm/gnome $ make all install package-recursive $ ls /home/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-7-current/Latest/ NOW, or REMOTE machines $ export PACKAGESITE=ftp://ftp.tld/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-7-current/Latest/ $ sudo pkg_add -r xorg $ sudo pkg_add -r gnome You can probably just do this for gnome and dependencies will work, but I've never used gnome, so I can't say. I don't have the link handy, you can google for the above information. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c:703.336.9354 Consultant / http://p6m7g8.net/Resume/resume.txt http://riderway.com / http://ridecharge.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 07:39:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8312B16A417 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:39:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E598013C447 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:39:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so2297816fgg.35 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:39:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=7k1Yb2ABD/I+TiCO0gA4lUVvUDvkycyGR1RoOP+2IIk=; b=VB0y9RYTeZFVzmj+qfP4UKSkI5GeCIdj7odjFgiRubHUzKbZMMMg/Me02+sJ+vFHMLaffqnKuN/eP0Qr4eTxviJbKWMjrTVX6Km+MO4sjQ18I4yLyoRH0g3CEavBdOh44Ucyzpfeux1ZvCWEabCdH5E3HPAzWlMEfEFxn5m/cqU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UwQPtqb1eCXa1LkfoZws+aGjkJiuNdGrOj8OPFEOvBArRvhI8cCf8ckBAvoR7x/Id5tfRMFzU9qurxu2gsohkKP24tJ4E/H3V06MTSoVVDkXzBLMsW6vwp7ZnMMCgA3gLwr7wmgrEj9htGwBX44rSn9HgQ0fJPbBWNGAU6/LzIk= Received: by 10.82.186.5 with SMTP id j5mr13340559buf.12.1200987565692; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:39:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.159.19 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 23:39:25 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <14989d6e0801212339s657c0011w5a498ce538ba60d5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:39:25 +0000 From: "Christian Walther" To: "Erich Dollansky" In-Reply-To: <4794BB91.7070106@pacific.net.sg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080121094451.N1777@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4794BB91.7070106@pacific.net.sg> Cc: Andreas Davour , Wojciech Puchar , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Throttle the CPU when the system is idle X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:39:27 -0000 On 21/01/2008, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > Andreas Davour wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Jan 2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > >>> > >>> I have toyed a bit with the dev.cpu.0.freq sysctl setting, and tried > >>> to lower it automatically when the system load goes down. For some > >>> reason it don't seem to work, even though the script works for simple > >>> debug output. > >>> > >>> Anyone have tried to do something similar? > >> > >> no but anyway - freebsd halts CPU when unused, even at full frequency > >> it uses very little power wne unused. > > > > Really? Good to know. I was wondering if I could make this laptop of > > mine a bit cooler, but then I guess not. > > I also believe that the CPU is actually halted when idle but using > powerd brings the temperatures on my machine still down. As powerd can > be adjusted in which interval it adjusts the CPU frequency, short tasks > run actually at the minimum frequency if the CPU was idle. [...] Roughly speaking the CPU is halted, but the duration of this sleep state depends on the speed the CPU is working at. Since the CPU has to wake up regularly to see if there are things to be done it does so more often at 2000MHz than at 200MHz, for example. Of course the sleep time is longer at 200MHz, which makes a system to appear sluggish. But on the other hand power savings are at max. Christian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 07:40:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ACAA16A41B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:40:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6E9213C47E for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:40:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0M7e8IK001618 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:40:08 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.6/8.12.11) id m0M7e73W049416; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:40:07 +0700 (ICT) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:40:07 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200801220740.m0M7e73W049416@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: teklimbu@wlink.com.np In-reply-to: <47959B51.8030405@wlink.com.np> (message from Tek Bahadur Limbu on Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:14:21 +0545) References: <47958F26.3030704@wlink.com.np> <200801220717.m0M7HLjR049208@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <47959B51.8030405@wlink.com.np> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need to re-generate the passwords in /etc/passwd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:40:10 -0000 > How do I use the above script for my machine which I access remotely by SSH. Yuck. I could email you a list of 1000 random strings? > > I could send it to you as Perl script, so you could generate 500 > > passwords in one run, or you call the web page enough number of times. > > That will be great! So I just run the script against /etc/passwd and > presto, all the users in that file will be generated new passwords. > > I will need a way to pass the newly generated passwords to individuals > users. No, the script only generates random strings, you would have to apply these strings to the accounts. The idea would be to make a file with a list of user name and new password, then use this file to feed to a script that force the new password. You have to keep that file in clear text, there is no way you can retreive the new opassword after you have applied it to a user account. Bests, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 07:56:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B29216A468 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from mailout.zetnet.co.uk (mailout.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.47.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A67D13C458 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:56:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from irwell.zetnet.co.uk ([194.247.47.48] helo=zetnet.co.uk) by mailout.zetnet.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JHDzB-0002Sq-8b; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:55:57 +0000 Received: from melon.esperance-linux.co.uk (54-144.adsl.zetnet.co.uk [194.247.54.144]) by zetnet.co.uk (8.14.1/8.14.1/Debian-9) with ESMTP id m0M7tu5L003176; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:55:56 GMT Received: by melon.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 176C1FCA4D7; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:55:51 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:55:51 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: Dave Message-ID: <20080122075551.GA12202@melon.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <000301c85cad$3b3b78b0$0200a8c0@satellite> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000301c85cad$3b3b78b0$0200a8c0@satellite> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE i386 X-Organisation: 'Esperance Linux' X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (zetnet.co.uk [194.247.46.1]); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:55:57 +0000 (GMT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: packaging a metaport X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:56:02 -0000 On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 11:14:06PM -0500, Dave wrote: > > Hello, > I'd like to compile and install xorg and gnome via metaports on a > machine, making packages out of the entire process, including > dependencies. My goal is to have a tarball that i can take to > other machines, extract it and do a pkg_add * and have xorg and > gnome installed via packages vs. recompiling the port. I tried a > make package but that doesn't work with metaports, and make > package-recursive doesn't happen either. > Thanks. > Dave. You could have a go with portupgrade using the p and r options. I don't think it will work with the metaports but you could do something like: # portupgrade -Nvpr xf86-video-nv-2.1.6 A word of warning though: $ pkg_info -r xf86-video-nv-2.1.6 | wc -l 90 and gnome: $ pkg_info -r gnome-icon-theme-2.20.0_1 | wc -l 95 You could again use portupgrade with the PP option to install your packages on the target machine. The way I'd do it, is use portupgrade with the PP and r options to do the original install and then just copy over the downloaded packages to the target machines. It would save on compilation time. -- Frank Contact info: http://www.esperance-linux.co.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 08:10:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB72216A418 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7524213C43E for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JHECh-0007pw-1Q for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:09:55 +0000 Received: from cairn.ints.net ([194.44.58.121]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:09:55 +0000 Received: from c.kworr by cairn.ints.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:09:55 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Volodymyr Kostyrko Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:09:42 +0200 Lines: 27 Message-ID: References: <2b6bd2cc0801191727v6cfcd2c5scf5f7bb68abc0a89@mail.gmail.com> <2b6bd2cc0801200216m1a604c1co9f780ba218f7a747@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cairn.ints.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; ru-RU; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20071205 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: Re: Failing to compile kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:10:02 -0000 illoai@gmail.com пишет: > On 20/01/2008, Celso Viana wrote: >> 2008/1/20, illoai@gmail.com : >>> On 19/01/2008, Celso Viana wrote: >>> . . . >>>> 1 error >>>> *** Error code 2 >>>> 1 error >>>> *** Error code 2 >>>> >>>> ...What can be wrong? >>> Did you compile with -j ? >>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> >> make -j4 bildkernel >> The correct way to do that is make -j4 -B buildkernel. > > You're going to have to recompile without -j for > the error to appear meaningful, I'm afraid. > -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 08:28:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8E916A46D for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:28:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC30013C455 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:28:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JHEUW-0000HL-77 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:28:20 +0000 Received: from 78-107-204-103.broadband.corbina.ru ([78.107.204.103]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:28:20 +0000 Received: from swell.k by 78-107-204-103.broadband.corbina.ru with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:28:20 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: swell.k@gmail.com Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:28:06 +0300 Lines: 12 Message-ID: <86sl0qs1rd.fsf@gmail.com> References: <000301c85cad$3b3b78b0$0200a8c0@satellite> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 78-107-204-103.broadband.corbina.ru User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (berkeley-unix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LVMvonoBa1DmTfvxdbcB292usmc= Sender: news Subject: Re: packaging a metaport X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:28:24 -0000 "Dave" writes: > I'd like to compile and install xorg and gnome via metaports on a > machine, making packages out of the entire process, including > dependencies. My goal is to have a tarball that i can take to other > machines, extract it and do a pkg_add * and have xorg and gnome > installed via packages vs. recompiling the port. I tried a make > package but that doesn't work with metaports, and make > package-recursive doesn't happen either. > Thanks. > Dave. like `pkg_create -xRb xorg-proto' ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 08:32:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4AF16A418 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:32:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: from smtp5.wlink.com.np (smtp5.wlink.com.np [202.79.32.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE9AF13C467 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:32:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from teklimbu@wlink.com.np) Received: (qmail 25555 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2008 08:32:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp2.wlink.com.np) (202.79.32.49) by 0 with SMTP; 22 Jan 2008 08:32:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 60490 invoked by uid 98); 22 Jan 2008 08:32:46 -0000 Received: from 202.79.36.7 by smtp2.wlink.com.np (envelope-from , uid 1010) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.90.3/3492. Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.7):. Processed in 0.039689 secs); 22 Jan 2008 08:32:46 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: teklimbu@wlink.com.np via smtp2.wlink.com.np X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(202.79.36.7):. Processed in 0.039689 secs) Received: from [202.79.36.7] (HELO [202.79.36.7]) by smtp2.wlink.com.np (qmail-smtpd) with SMTP; 22 Jan 2008 08:32:30 -0000 (Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:17:30 +0545) Message-ID: <4795A9F2.9090204@wlink.com.np> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:16:46 +0545 From: Tek Bahadur Limbu User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olivier Nicole References: <47958F26.3030704@wlink.com.np> <200801220717.m0M7HLjR049208@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> <47959B51.8030405@wlink.com.np> <200801220740.m0M7e73W049416@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> In-Reply-To: <200801220740.m0M7e73W049416@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Check-By: smtp2.wlink.com.np Spam: No ; 0.2 / 8.0 X-Spam-Status-WL: No, hits=0.2 required=5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Need to re-generate the passwords in /etc/passwd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:32:51 -0000 Hi Oliver, Olivier Nicole wrote: >> How do I use the above script for my machine which I access remotely by SSH. > > Yuck. I could email you a list of 1000 random strings? > >>> I could send it to you as Perl script, so you could generate 500 >>> passwords in one run, or you call the web page enough number of times. >> That will be great! So I just run the script against /etc/passwd and >> presto, all the users in that file will be generated new passwords. >> >> I will need a way to pass the newly generated passwords to individuals >> users. > > No, the script only generates random strings, you would have to apply > these strings to the accounts. > > The idea would be to make a file with a list of user name and new > password, then use this file to feed to a script that force the new > password. > > You have to keep that file in clear text, there is no way you can > retreive the new opassword after you have applied it to a user > account. Ok I get it. I will follow it up according to your methods. Thanks. > > > Bests, > > Olivier > > > > -- With best regards and good wishes, Yours sincerely, Tek Bahadur Limbu System Administrator (TAG/TDG Group) Jwl Systems Department Worldlink Communications Pvt. Ltd. Jawalakhel, Nepal http://www.wlink.com.np http://teklimbu.wordpress.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 08:36:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B564816A418 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:36:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5493D13C45D for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:36:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JHEcH-0000hm-6g for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:36:21 +0000 Received: from 78-107-204-103.broadband.corbina.ru ([78.107.204.103]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:36:21 +0000 Received: from swell.k by 78-107-204-103.broadband.corbina.ru with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:36:21 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: swell.k@gmail.com Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:36:13 +0300 Lines: 15 Message-ID: <86odbes1du.fsf@gmail.com> References: <560f92640801212145v58769b9bv1d08e23a9469fcc8@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 78-107-204-103.broadband.corbina.ru User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (berkeley-unix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:NWVK0H00rHhq0dh1zjdGTosWHQA= Sender: news Subject: Re: How do port Makefiles work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:36:32 -0000 "Nerius Landys" writes: > I'm trying to figure out how a port makefile configures, makes, makes > install from a source tarball. You'd better look at /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk for port specifics > The port I'm interested in in particular is /usr/ports/x11/Terminal; I have > it built and installed just fine using the ports system. Now I'm trying to > tweak the source code, build, and install locally in a home directory, all > without using the ports system. So, I've taken the archive > Terminal-0.2.6.tar.bz2, unpacked it, and ran './configure > --prefix='. Then I run 'make', and I get this error: I guess it's because Terminal port contains `USE_GMAKE= yes' From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 10:59:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E5516A417 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6855D13C447 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:59:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so440895nfb.33 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:59:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=RDIf9dxxMNYXG7IApc9pxYV9vXQ7OVs89EH8NreUpZ4=; b=Gt1/NP2klmY+KrSofpb/ibTT99USDEOg7yLVqUAxzCJ5GKjJazOrLopBSLJ+vL6LfNY7w1ghcAypiRD7+YNkS6MIeTwfOqV1Znv7ZG5vBQAZDBww+BcjHC2DwP2Ga6WTSB18hKifN+qVDY4+9N5SdjUDTeK9/RHMteGi7QRqsO8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=W8QBojQQXeIjRDFki8fgCtbIVq5WxlAbwmg80iNT0MChlFb/Z8PPDh8VNQmUUO+YFffOtCxPG9Z9Y1UyJIHavQqOBdhlYLUB6nP4O3QrRWRWj4tQTRPW7W+XU9aEO+7hWlCWDLKyo4Nhdn3o3g0H8Sa48WOsabWkHEacTDvrB4A= Received: by 10.78.171.20 with SMTP id t20mr10798718hue.41.1200999590995; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:59:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 02:59:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801220259x1b7dd4efw7a8fc1e8a60d2cc9@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:59:50 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: pflogd log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:59:53 -0000 Hello, I noticed that pflog is not being written to. $ l /var/log/pflog -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 60 Jan 22 00:00 /var/log/pflog However, the process running pflogd runs as _pflogd. Does this mean I should chown the log file with user _pflogd? _pflogd 248 0.0 0.2 1632 1056 ?? S 6:49AM 0:01.31 pflogd: [suspended] -s 116 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd) To complete the picture: $ ps aux |grep pf root 36 0.0 0.0 0 8 ?? DL 6:49AM 0:01.04 [softdepflush] root 246 0.0 0.2 1568 1004 ?? Is 6:49AM 0:00.01 pflogd: [priv] (pflogd) _pflogd 248 0.0 0.2 1632 1056 ?? S 6:49AM 0:01.32 pflogd: [suspended] -s 116 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd) Many thanks for your advice! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 11:35:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3BFA16A419 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:35:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: from smtp.teledomenet.gr (smtp.teledomenet.gr [213.142.128.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BE7513C4DB for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:35:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@teledomenet.gr) Received: by smtp.teledomenet.gr (Postfix, from userid 58) id 7019414224C; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:35:35 +0200 (EET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on smtp.teledomenet.gr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.3 Received: from iris (unknown [192.168.1.71]) by smtp.teledomenet.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2ED142025; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:35:31 +0200 (EET) From: Nikos Vassiliadis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:34:44 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200801211400.33730.perlcat@alltel.net> In-Reply-To: <200801211400.33730.perlcat@alltel.net> X-NCC-RegID: gr.telehouse MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801221334.45017.nvass@teledomenet.gr> Cc: perlcat Subject: Re: bind: Can't assign requested address using ssh (or anything else) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:35:37 -0000 On Monday 21 January 2008 22:00:33 perlcat wrote: > Trying to access a vpn using ssh on 6.2 - STABLE. Haven't found an > answer anywhere, and so I must be totally missing the right questions to > ask or configurations to look at. > > This problem is consistent regardless of port chosen or access method. I > can duplicate at will with ssh. Here's the command that fails: > > $ ssh -X -N -L 127.0.0.3:13390:192.168.1.44:3390 tyson@xx.xx.xx.xx > tyson@xx.xx.xx.xx's password: > bind: Can't assign requested address > channel_setup_fwd_listener: cannot listen to port: 13390 > Could not request local forwarding. Ofcourse it fails, you are trying to bind to address 127.0.0.3, however there is no such address assigned to a local network interface. Either: 1) change 127.0.0.3 to 127.0.0.1 You don't explain what this 127.0.0.3 is. 2) ifconfig lo0 add 127.3/32 HTH, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 12:05:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7C116A418 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:05:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E9013C4D5 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:05:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0MC3TG2002114; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:03:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0MC3Rpt002111; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:03:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:03:27 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:05:22 -0000 http://www.spamsuite.com/node/351 jest first step to criminalize unix at all From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 12:32:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2859E16A417 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prabhuh@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D90DA13C506 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:32:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prabhuh@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so4368563waf.3 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:32:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=HmtaXvhCbS4SDm8hQA0luz4XmRvE9mvPiTcCxdLoAtM=; b=TOB2Ue+3IFxfest3gI0X6XH3ChOKQNqeK7WYZbbPgTbcn7TtxMl3TGcyfEDoB8+V/7FrUupcwGUI5uNWa4gbQjjDOj9G4YxNS2KQxpk5N/KkoiRcq5BdiaxjWSyHx4o3u+Hm4HTcFLeeNZuOZr2DCcDO4PB8cGAx34b9bQWNw50= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=XUx4ZxqwrIUwS8LPBUsR4Y8WZNH1BQ7Z6Pu0lXmtRQ21qlXX1YSBUb+f02ZmrCZNGJ0oY5uvNgZh9mdz9kT54sHep6Xc/AzUxlCCNzVAUV9dPD4eUxL5lnZ3Ywc9koIiUJ6l+xwWydOGF1LTT6Kn81pnWNjRD71HxGN4iijWHOA= Received: by 10.114.146.1 with SMTP id t1mr6499749wad.20.1201003638705; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:07:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.91.19 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 04:07:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:37:18 +0530 From: "Prabhu Hariharan" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: IPv6 address persistent configuration thru ifconfig X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:32:15 -0000 Hi, In host implementation, if I manually configure global ipv6 address via ifconfig command then those addresses are not persistent after making the interface DOWN and again UP, which is not the case for IPv4 addresses. Is this an intentional behavior that all ipv6 address needs to be removed from interface if it goes DOWN? I feel the configurations that have been made manually, needs to get unconfigured manually and not programatically. Regards, Prabhu H From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 12:40:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2D716A41A for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:40:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD22D13C469 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:40:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0MCcbZs002436; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:38:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0MCcUX7002433; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:38:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:38:30 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Prabhu Hariharan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080122133735.P2408@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6 address persistent configuration thru ifconfig X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:40:37 -0000 > In host implementation, if I manually configure global ipv6 address via > ifconfig command then those addresses are not persistent after making the > interface DOWN and again UP, which is not the case for IPv4 addresses. Is > this an intentional behavior that all ipv6 address needs to be removed from > interface if it goes DOWN? I feel the configurations that have been made nothing gets removed [root@wojtek ~]# ifconfig fxp0 fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=8 inet6 fe80::2d0:59ff:febe:fadc%fxp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 10.255.245.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.255.245.255 inet6 2001:4070:101:2::1 prefixlen 64 ether 00:d0:59:be:fa:dc media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier [root@wojtek ~]# ifconfig fxp0 down [root@wojtek ~]# ifconfig fxp0 fxp0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 options=8 inet6 fe80::2d0:59ff:febe:fadc%fxp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 10.255.245.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.255.245.255 inet6 2001:4070:101:2::1 prefixlen 64 ether 00:d0:59:be:fa:dc media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier [root@wojtek ~]# ifconfig fxp0 up [root@wojtek ~]# ifconfig fxp0 fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=8 inet6 fe80::2d0:59ff:febe:fadc%fxp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 10.255.245.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.255.245.255 inet6 2001:4070:101:2::1 prefixlen 64 ether 00:d0:59:be:fa:dc media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier > manually, needs to get unconfigured manually and not programatically. > > Regards, > Prabhu H > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 13:14:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62AD616A421 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:14:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberleo@cyberleo.net) Received: from pizzabox.cyberleo.net (alpha.cyberleo.net [198.145.45.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118B413C4EB for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:14:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberleo@cyberleo.net) Received: (qmail 67323 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2008 13:14:32 -0000 Received: from adsl-75-3-145-49.dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net (HELO ?172.16.44.14?) (cyberleo@cyberleo.net@75.3.145.49) by alpha.cyberleo.net with ESMTPA; 22 Jan 2008 13:14:32 -0000 Message-ID: <4795EC30.4090305@cyberleo.net> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:14:24 -0600 From: CyberLeo Kitsana User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071122) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Schiz0 References: <8d23ec860801091038i4878b8b1lbfbacbd8a4dbac73@mail.gmail.com> <8d23ec860801211012j60d3eb39x19e3076f3b608338@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8d23ec860801211012j60d3eb39x19e3076f3b608338@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: Boot Loader Broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:14:35 -0000 Schiz0 wrote: > Can someone help me either solve the bootloader problem, or just how > to get into single user mode? If, instead of the pretty, numbered boot loader menu, you get the old 4.x style 'Hit [Enter] to boot immediately' autoboot prompt, hit any key other than enter, then type 'boot -s' at the loader prompt and hit enter. That should boot the kernel, then drop you into single user mode. -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Technical Administrator CyberLeo.Net Webhosting http://www.CyberLeo.Net Furry Peace! - http://wwww.fur.com/peace/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 13:32:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E04916A418 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:32:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg (smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CC5CA13C459 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:32:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 32261 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2008 13:32:09 -0000 Received: from adsl181.dyn229.pacific.net.sg (HELO P2120.somewherefaraway.com) (oceanare@210.24.229.181) by smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg with ESMTPA; 22 Jan 2008 13:32:06 -0000 Message-ID: <4795F048.3090501@pacific.net.sg> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:31:52 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070826) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar References: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:32:12 -0000 Hi, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > http://www.spamsuite.com/node/351 > > jest first step to criminalize unix at all first step? Many Unix tools are considered illegal by German law since last summer. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 13:45:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467FA16A420 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:45:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netslists@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B081D13C458 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:45:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netslists@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so2374989fgg.35 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:45:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/3Ez4AqhSpkYDAclA+ZDjntqRBoKmf47hQOpcP5zBcU=; b=Zvg9R98q9JApCluXzMpHsdTB0CBnOBWr4sp5y+0IeYHdzTUmM6UqkDEacQJcWFxMsXjvBVlal/SUqQLtXDudVHRfaTzlFXjahQNNdGj6RUb3BNWejuS9FlppAKdbxjZImyNrL1O0svvw4YZXWZZq0GfuJF5UlP1eXfTiTKp/Kgw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rdf2+QMF1Zrceqpp+ZxRAZIgD8akm5q8CJONSHdHdyybupnsWRrLLO/WPJzBtqNnMZm9dDpUHpn8lmtLtG9lQ26wjdAgg7xw3/xALt15gi5Our/FwWuJS4n+ltTSnVUUKsFA1+5lo66OgPvx4DWzgrH6Y3pAapORherVmSd5khU= Received: by 10.86.97.7 with SMTP id u7mr7658066fgb.54.1201009532478; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:45:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.9.8? ( [91.135.49.10]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm13794990fge.7.2008.01.22.05.45.30 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:45:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4795F37B.4040908@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:45:31 +0100 From: Sten Daniel Soersdal User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Updating older 7.0 to newer sources, local buildworld problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:45:34 -0000 I'm having troubles updating my buildworld and i've had troubles narrowing it down on google. My question is: Is there any way i could update the system in the state it is now? (Preferably without reinstalling the entire system from scratch.) PS. I've heard about freebsd-update but never got it to work (see below) INFORMATION: Initial sources where built sometime before september 19. uname -a ------------------- FreeBSD alpha.arcticwireless.no 7.0-CURRENT-200706 FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT-200706 #0: Sat Jun 30 00:13:20 CEST 2007 root@alpha.arcticwireless.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ALPHA i386 gcc -v: -------------------- Using built-in specs. Target: i386-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.0 20070514 [FreeBSD] freebsd-update fetch: --------------------- Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 1 mirrors found. Fetching public key from update1.FreeBSD.org... failed. No mirrors remaining, giving up. I update by issuing (i want to build GENERIC); make buildworld && make kernel && mergemaster -p && reboot [singleuser mode] make installworld && mergemaster the error i get is: echo "\"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/cp/cp-objcp-common.c\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/objc/objc-act.h\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-parser.c\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-tree.h\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-decl.c\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-objc-common.c\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-common.c\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-common.h\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-pragma.c\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/objc/objc-act.c\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-lang.c\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-tree.h\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-decl.c\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-common.c\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-common.h\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-pragma.c\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-objc-common.c\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/c-parser.c\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "NULL};" >> gtyp-gen.h echo "static const char * const lang_dir_names[] = {" >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"c\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"cp\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "\"objc\", " >> gtyp-gen.h echo "NULL};" >> gtyp-gen.h cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I. -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DPREFIX=\"/usr\" -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../cc_tools -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../cc_tools -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/config -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcclibs/include -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcclibs/libcpp/include -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcclibs/libdecnumber -g -DGENERATOR_FILE -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/legacy/usr/include -c /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/gengtype.c In file included from ./tm.h:4, from /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/gengtype.c:24: ./options.h:901: error: redeclaration of enumerator 'OPT_w' ./options.h:899: error: previous definition of 'OPT_w' was here *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. -- Sten Daniel Soersdal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 14:00:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB7F16A419 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:00:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from javier_elizondo69@yahoo.com) Received: from web55108.mail.re4.yahoo.com (web55108.mail.re4.yahoo.com [206.190.58.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D3A013C4F0 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:00:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from javier_elizondo69@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 53869 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Jan 2008 13:59:57 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=Fwfcs6UbgMMUGR8HolReMNjf6ro/nfXP0gmLz/4eN+OUOaoxNhhX6DcJeDWNclux0c1Nqpe0T9nfdjM6n+0oJ31Ahmmbr2sgsMK2g6RHlCDhWp/32VixeCYh5aakr6G1wV4SVIhEiOup30xFLeSPdYGBsY2xYLlgMYfgp4wB17w=; X-YMail-OSG: xz68cWwVM1mmMkvaawi5Q.9fYpBHXebT9j98UM3SX2zFyLDcBeNx_JoACG8hlorgYiqijA4uFhKYDgJQEtgOnbBndXANiTefUrrES5Eine4974sztJHCNoGNIX_BHTGtafJA9qAAlXc- Received: from [75.111.128.168] by web55108.mail.re4.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:59:57 PST Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 05:59:57 -0800 (PST) From: Javier Elizondo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <7ad7ddd90801220013l1c2a23bag24d09eb1e40ca612@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <151154.52924.qm@web55108.mail.re4.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: problems with LC_ALL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:00:01 -0000 Hi again, Following the suggestion of Ulrich. The paths change and I have more problems with x11, the path without changing without lang is sw/bin:/sw/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin with lang /sw/bin/:/sw/bin:/sw/sbin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/X11/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin I have the command in .bash_profile export PATH=/sw/bin/:$PATH but in the first case I moved the file .bash_profile, in the second case I removed the file .bash_profile. If I tried to run a program that show in OS X, I got the following message Macintosh:~ javier$ xfig& dyld: Library not loaded: /usr/X11R6/lib/libXaw3d.7.dylib Referenced from: /sw/bin/xfig Reason: image not found Trace/BPT trap Macintosh:~ javier$ so it seems to me that the whole setting has serious problems, I do not know if it would be better to reinstald the whole X11, fink, finkcommander, etc... --- Ulrich Spoerlein wrote: > On Jan 22, 2008 12:38 AM, Javier Elizondo > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I did what Ulrich Spoerleinsaid in his message > below. > > Now things work, however, the paths I have for > some > > programs that run in terminal are lost. I have to > > write the whole path to the executable file. Is > this > > normal?, what does it get lost? The export command > was > > written in .bash_profile. I made an alias for the > > program in the same file, but could anyone explain > why > > with the command "export LANG=en_US.ISO8859-1" the > > path to the programs that were recognized before > now > > they are lost. > > Well, you should tell us what your PATH is set to. > Simply run 'echo > $PATH' and see if this changes with and without > LANG. > > Uli > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 14:02:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2528F16A417 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:02:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1DEB13C509 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:02:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0ME0nE9002560; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:00:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0ME0j3n002557; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:00:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:00:45 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Erich Dollansky In-Reply-To: <4795F048.3090501@pacific.net.sg> Message-ID: <20080122145708.S2543@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4795F048.3090501@pacific.net.sg> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:02:43 -0000 >> jest first step to criminalize unix at all > > first step? > > Many Unix tools are considered illegal by German law since last summer. > could you mail me more about it ? it's as stupid as considering knives to be illegal. yes i can kill with knife, but i don't do this, and need it to slice a bread. and there are 1000 other ways to kill - without knife > Erich > can you type ls? ;) things considered impossible 50 years ago, stupid/funny 30 years ago, strange and unlikely 10 years ago, are true now. Orwell should just change title from "1984" to "2010-15" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 14:06:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBED16A41B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:06:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prabhuh@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF16813C474 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:06:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prabhuh@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so4409115waf.3 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:06:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=3OOLUORhArJpZN9JYLsKnEpd4T+QGhqSAOsWUjU/4pY=; b=ZWvtS58kEs9PLS9sGE4eAas/XGF79W8ppnr+U98McyIEMKOiOo2GinaEtDlcOWaV/JbUUX3LDqzHpqC6vtm1G5BT8s4WhmJvaQ4wl1yKIofOYQfxwLU3QBo/os4WT+Aid24vFZipjTPp7zAKsVnO9RRIKFi6RKCfeY3Kd+DoS5g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=IIw5tJH0r5lfF+VLY+Re1ywakj4VUWiBl1cQ3ZMgFAwoJz9TtfbaZ4ZaiCm94LzrR8vTqwM31gbBK41HsO3ppttxz2jzF8pdrIlKMBFB6PuSKg2Zd/FSzKh9UOcjiuq5FtgE5S8vlhETwUgJofxAtZUE5iAHd57SQjcE/2HvmGg= Received: by 10.115.88.1 with SMTP id q1mr6420671wal.64.1201010760653; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:06:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.91.19 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:06:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:36:00 +0530 From: "Prabhu Hariharan" To: "Wojciech Puchar" In-Reply-To: <20080122133735.P2408@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20080122133735.P2408@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6 address persistent configuration thru ifconfig X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:06:11 -0000 Is this behavior exists from the beginning of KAME integration or available in latest freebsd code? Because I was using a box which derives its ipv6 code from KAME project and the behavior was different from this. Also, in a host which uses Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 4 (Nahant Update 4), I've seen the ipv6 addresses get removed when I do an interface down. Please let me know, if you have any thoughts on the same. Regards, Prabhu H On Jan 22, 2008 6:08 PM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > In host implementation, if I manually configure global ipv6 address via > > ifconfig command then those addresses are not persistent after making > the > > interface DOWN and again UP, which is not the case for IPv4 addresses. > Is > > this an intentional behavior that all ipv6 address needs to be removed > from > > interface if it goes DOWN? I feel the configurations that have been > made > > nothing gets removed > [root@wojtek ~]# ifconfig fxp0 > fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=8 > inet6 fe80::2d0:59ff:febe:fadc%fxp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > inet 10.255.245.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.255.245.255 > inet6 2001:4070:101:2::1 prefixlen 64 > ether 00:d0:59:be:fa:dc > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) > status: no carrier > [root@wojtek ~]# ifconfig fxp0 down > [root@wojtek ~]# ifconfig fxp0 > fxp0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 > options=8 > inet6 fe80::2d0:59ff:febe:fadc%fxp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > inet 10.255.245.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.255.245.255 > inet6 2001:4070:101:2::1 prefixlen 64 > ether 00:d0:59:be:fa:dc > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) > status: no carrier > [root@wojtek ~]# ifconfig fxp0 up > [root@wojtek ~]# ifconfig fxp0 > fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=8 > inet6 fe80::2d0:59ff:febe:fadc%fxp0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 > inet 10.255.245.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.255.245.255 > inet6 2001:4070:101:2::1 prefixlen 64 > ether 00:d0:59:be:fa:dc > media: Ethernet autoselect (none) > status: no carrier > > > > manually, needs to get unconfigured manually and not programatically. > > > > Regards, > > Prabhu H > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 14:12:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70B4616A41A for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:12:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (filter2-tmobile.zx.nl [194.187.76.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3152E13C458 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:12:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D181C72D6; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:12:38 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zx.nl Received: from filter2-tmobile.zx.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (filter2.zx.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10127) with ESMTP id MUId2-vPNFhx; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:12:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [89.205.133.194]) by filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:12:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4795F9F1.1010603@student.utwente.nl> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:13:05 +0000 From: "Alphons \"Fonz\" van Werven" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar References: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4795F048.3090501@pacific.net.sg> <20080122145708.S2543@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080122145708.S2543@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:12:42 -0000 Wojciech Puchar wrote: > Orwell should just change title from "1984" to "2010-15" Maybe it's just me, but this whole thing kinda feels like somebody walking around the house naked and then suing an innocent passer-by for seeing them naked. Oh my, this is so ridiculous... Alphons -- VISTA - Viruses Intruders Spyware Trojans Adware From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 14:19:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95C816A418 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:19:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 720E713C4D1 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:19:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l8so1353731nzf.13 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:19:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=j0Brtbv0qTMCrg5+EsIRC2TtOHqZfRPUUMmTrhrE/rM=; b=eO2d4Gv/tc7IhJKtZ0IS6LrrRcRYTTe+/A6uSEp/U6IIvFw4+H+KIpJ8NxcA1NIQG5HxqFWgVxH/Dhg0MxKyievG5p2sXsWJz+Zth9Qm0PmYhUtxlhErWXKzjy8F+YJD80AYg4HvxX7eYLt0xbeirP0qOBSQKrWtGkTUUOb3aus= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bILrXNl4AsXEHeDrOPJxAVUgl3tXYt0izmJGmwVRJPzV/ODa+6cgm1Z+B0uUTXb60+jbUGa+lomk1VrJvMEgRUdHhtQiy9y3x27dYQFCwOjFuPXU5cx/7YJf6q+aTqNSIIW78TkwZ2FUE6iS80KzI7l3oSk/9yxftkhyvo59lEg= Received: by 10.115.14.1 with SMTP id r1mr5754649wai.31.1201011559140; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:19:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.52.14 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:19:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8d23ec860801220619l1f7eab02q385c2bd3a83ccb70@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:19:19 -0500 From: Schiz0 To: "Bob Johnson" In-Reply-To: <54db43990801211908j6f46d5a5xbbe51128c4ce54eb@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8d23ec860801091038i4878b8b1lbfbacbd8a4dbac73@mail.gmail.com> <8d23ec860801211012j60d3eb39x19e3076f3b608338@mail.gmail.com> <54db43990801211908j6f46d5a5xbbe51128c4ce54eb@mail.gmail.com> Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: Boot Loader Broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:19:20 -0000 On Jan 21, 2008 10:08 PM, Bob Johnson wrote: > On 1/21/08, Schiz0 wrote: > > On Jan 9, 2008 1:38 PM, Schiz0 wrote: > [...] > > > > Now, I'm even in a bigger hole. My power died this weekend, and I > > guess the / partition has some errors on it, so it is being mounted > > read-only. But I'm unable to get into single user mode. I tried > > "shutdown now" and "init 1" and they both brought me back to the > > multi-user login prompt. And there's no menu to reboot and select > > single user mode from. > > What do you mean by "multi-user login prompt"? I mean it just asks me to login with a username. Like the normal... FreeBSD/i386 (Hostname) (ttyv0) login: ...thing. > > > > Can someone help me either solve the bootloader problem, or just how > > to get into single user mode? > > When you reboot the system (e.g. press ctrl-alt-delete or issued the > "shutdown -r now" command), it should present a boot menu with > numbered choices. What happens if you select the one corresponding to > "boot in single user mode". Or do you never get to the menu? If you > never got that menu, you are almost certainly in single-user mode. > > Is there anything in /boot/loader.conf ? > loader.conf has: "# --- Generated by sysinstall --- hint.acpi.0.disabled=1" I actually ran a diff on the files from the 7.0-RC1 installer iso and on my /boot. I ran the diff on loader.conf, loader.rc, and all the .4th files. No diff output came up (meaning they were obviously the same). I was told to also check my fstab, and nothing odd was in there either. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 14:22:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3968616A41A for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:22:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB5913C459 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:22:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so4416745waf.3 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:22:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=G8sbuEcpSNj6I0J42lZIuMcc8Fgz7oYNLLFjbvFWUjA=; b=Vc2FZVqwFaL9wfdcJOZYJr/ap/HgKqq09YPqPj43yYrLZot8iAu9/ww9/N83BVJ7OH3UQMrs5cQEkU7RVpuggUD85AF2id4dbACf67OFH2gCYCoMwBGgvNSGRJ7pni5crBlZ3eWPhtIVUoACXLZ2rnRWTPVuS1hmu0cHPhYHlZ8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cQc0vKbAK2C+ax5q8CDgXuT205jEUAkVZA0bLWrsRLoH2L2HNvayjIblIyV3LW/iH2KMedntWzTvyw1UI2CPiknQe3KrPJCJLqgGB5AXMKsUkB4WfUZ3W7jrCc2MUNax0xw2Ca7VKpUPVMvUh0uvlOzdDPfdQWlNLIt7/YOfETo= Received: by 10.114.192.1 with SMTP id p1mr2685144waf.47.1201011758726; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:22:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.52.14 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 06:22:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8d23ec860801220622y5680a2bav492a41d15dbb82ca@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:22:38 -0500 From: Schiz0 To: "Bob Johnson" In-Reply-To: <54db43990801211908j6f46d5a5xbbe51128c4ce54eb@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <8d23ec860801091038i4878b8b1lbfbacbd8a4dbac73@mail.gmail.com> <8d23ec860801211012j60d3eb39x19e3076f3b608338@mail.gmail.com> <54db43990801211908j6f46d5a5xbbe51128c4ce54eb@mail.gmail.com> Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: Boot Loader Broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:22:39 -0000 On Jan 21, 2008 10:08 PM, Bob Johnson wrote: > On 1/21/08, Schiz0 wrote: > > On Jan 9, 2008 1:38 PM, Schiz0 wrote: > [...] > > > > Now, I'm even in a bigger hole. My power died this weekend, and I > > guess the / partition has some errors on it, so it is being mounted > > read-only. But I'm unable to get into single user mode. I tried > > "shutdown now" and "init 1" and they both brought me back to the > > multi-user login prompt. And there's no menu to reboot and select > > single user mode from. > > What do you mean by "multi-user login prompt"? > > > > > Can someone help me either solve the bootloader problem, or just how > > to get into single user mode? > > When you reboot the system (e.g. press ctrl-alt-delete or issued the > "shutdown -r now" command), it should present a boot menu with > numbered choices. What happens if you select the one corresponding to > "boot in single user mode". Or do you never get to the menu? If you > never got that menu, you are almost certainly in single-user mode. > > Is there anything in /boot/loader.conf ? > > - Bob > Sorry for the double post, I hit Send before I realized I didn't answer half your questions :-X I tried doing ctrl+alt+del, and it just reboots into the normal login prompt for multiuser. I do not get any boot menu (And I'm definitely not in single user mode already, all demons are running and such), just an error saying: ----------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD/i386 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1 (root@Mercury, Tue Jan 21 14:22:21 EST 2008) > \ \: unknown command - /boot/kernel/kernel text=0x29e868 data=0x2db8c+0x23814 syms=[0x4+0x34c10+0x4+0x43ef1] Hit [Enter] to boot immediately, or any other key for a command prompt. Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel] in 4 seconds ... ----------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 14:41:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3992D16A4F5 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:41:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinguely@casselton.net) Received: from casselton.net (casselton.net [63.165.140.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DC513C44B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:41:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinguely@casselton.net) Received: from casselton.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by casselton.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0MEOsjX088738; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:24:55 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tinguely@casselton.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=casselton.net; s=ccnMail; t=1201011895; bh=LtvWgugKM2gLXj8d4SWFxGmHNPHoiohbhJAE2+V Enhs=; h=Date:From:Message-Id:To:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To; b=WuVs7CuN vtcFdW9T6We1R/eeJey79suzf9D0/Z9b3pT0UXpFx5ZY52fpSxJhhFXu0zhVNjtVqb2 /CFG8AcygQhmdYCTbxdxmuZgMlRubd7TqyGH63WdRqPuChGJ/kIsB5YUGzclH6gR7EI c61aQpZI/DJwN4tQinV6t60GdQer8= Received: (from tinguely@localhost) by casselton.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m0MEOsjX088736; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:24:54 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tinguely) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:24:54 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Tinguely Message-Id: <200801221424.m0MEOsjX088736@casselton.net> To: oceanare@pacific.net.sg, wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl In-Reply-To: <20080122145708.S2543@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:41:26 -0000 This should go to -chat. Living just outside of Fargo, I find this interesting. I guess I better not telnet to service ports to make sure HTTP/SMTP/IMAP/IPOP servers are running. Admininstratively, the Zone transfers should be restricted to secondary peers. If a person constructed the walls of their house out of glass, how can you complain that the neighbors that are capable of moving their heads of watching you at night? Sounds like the zone transfer is the foundation of the case of the serious charges. I do not have sympathy for someone that attempts or conspires with others to "home invasion" just because the house walls are made of glass and they can see the fine china. please move this to -chat. --Mark Tinguely. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 15:13:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8889C16A419 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (dsl081-163-122.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.163.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6454D13C448 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from w16.stradamotorsports.com (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0MFDDFs078906; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:13:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <47960812.8070101@highperformance.net> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:13:22 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sten Daniel Soersdal References: <4795F37B.4040908@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4795F37B.4040908@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=failed version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on s4.stradamotorsports.com Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Updating older 7.0 to newer sources, local buildworld problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:13:16 -0000 Sten Daniel Soersdal wrote: > I'm having troubles updating my buildworld and i've had troubles > narrowing it down on google. > > My question is: > > Is there any way i could update the system in the state it is now? > (Preferably without reinstalling the entire system from scratch.) > > PS. I've heard about freebsd-update but never got it to work (see below) I have never used freebsd-update so I can't comment there. I think that's a binary update though. You are trying to build from source. I would use cvsup to update my source tree to 7.0-RELEASE. Since your initial sources are before Sep 19, they are not 7.0-RELEASE. Read about cvsup in the handbook. Look at the example files in /usr/share/examples/cvsup. The I would run 'make clean' and 'make buildworld' all over again. Except for creating a newfs and tweaking files in /etc, building the world is pretty much installing the entire system. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cutting-edge.html Be careful about the cvs tag that you use. RELENG_7_0_0_RELEASE is what you will eventually want. If that tag has not yet been set by releng@, then you will delete your sources. I recommend '-d 20' with cvsup to protect yourself from accidental deletions. RELENG_7 is probably what you want until 7.0 is actually released. Regards, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 16:04:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE44916A41A for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:04:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA97313C442 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:04:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0MG1sHR001350; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:01:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0MG1nIe001347; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:01:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:01:49 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: "Alphons \"Fonz\" van Werven" In-Reply-To: <4795F9F1.1010603@student.utwente.nl> Message-ID: <20080122170018.G1140@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4795F048.3090501@pacific.net.sg> <20080122145708.S2543@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4795F9F1.1010603@student.utwente.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:04:15 -0000 > Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> Orwell should just change title from "1984" to "2010-15" > > Maybe it's just me, but this whole thing kinda feels like somebody > walking around the house naked and then suing an innocent passer-by > for seeing them naked. > > Oh my, this is so ridiculous... no it is EXACTLY like that! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 16:08:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5F416A41B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:08:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perlcat@alltel.net) Received: from ispmxmta06-srv.windstream.net (ispmxmta06-srv.windstream.net [166.102.165.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A632513C455 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:08:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perlcat@alltel.net) Received: from ispmxaamta05-gx.windstream.net ([72.37.126.241]) by ispmxmta06-srv.windstream.net with ESMTP id <20080122160831.OYPC15841.ispmxmta06-srv.windstream.net@ispmxaamta05-gx.windstream.net> for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:08:31 -0600 Received: from ext-b14-241.omhq.uprr.com ([72.37.126.241]) by ispmxaamta05-gx.windstream.net with ESMTP id <20080122160831.SDCA6487.ispmxaamta05-gx.windstream.net@ext-b14-241.omhq.uprr.com> for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:08:31 -0600 From: perlcat Organization: dis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:05:05 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200801211400.33730.perlcat@alltel.net> <200801221334.45017.nvass@teledomenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <200801221334.45017.nvass@teledomenet.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801221005.05937.perlcat@alltel.net> Subject: Re: bind: Can't assign requested address using ssh (or anything else) -- resolution X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:08:32 -0000 > > $ ssh -X -N -L 127.0.0.3:13390:192.168.1.44:3390 tyson@xx.xx.xx.xx > > tyson@xx.xx.xx.xx's password: > > bind: Can't assign requested address > > channel_setup_fwd_listener: cannot listen to port: 13390 > > Could not request local forwarding. > > Ofcourse it fails, you are trying to bind to address 127.0.0.3, > however there is no such address assigned to a local network > interface. Either: > > You don't explain what this 127.0.0.3 is. This does it. > 2) ifconfig lo0 add 127.3/32 Thanks for responding! The vpn software I need to use requires me to configure and bind a VPN connection from 127.0.0.x:port to the loopback. It is a handy way of grabbing an entirely unique IP that doesn't collide with whatever network you're on. Of course, it probably isn't the best idea if a bunch of different apps start to pull stuff like this -- but I wasn't the brainiac that came up with this idea. Anyway, it seems to be a fairly common way of doing this, so I'm explaining in detail to benefit future searches. Some methods (SSH) allow me to manually select the IP/port, so for my example I use it. Others (Juniper Networks) just go and pick the IP for me, and can assign any number of connections depending upon configuration. In a Windows world, since there're no controls and stupid things are allowed to happen, the IP address/port assignment is done on the fly, and you then have to view the active VPN connections to figure out what IP address/port are in use. With a real OS, privileged things like this need to be done by a privileged user before the client can assign to it. Since they don't change without human intervention (the number is permanent based upon the order they load -- 127.2, 127.3, etc.) and are assigned in a logical fashion, I should be able to bind the new addresses that it will use to lo0 and it should Just Work. And it does. tsclient can now load and get me onto the Windows Server I need to control. It's a hollow victory -- I feel so *dirty* when I work with Windows, but I have to if I want to get paid... The Juniper Network client info: =======setup information======== RDP Direct option: Remote Server: Client Port: 33890 Server Port: 3389 ========================== Restarted the Secure Application manager. =========error info=========== In the Secure Application Manager Window, when I click on the Details Tab. I see the application I added with an error: cannot bind to the port 33890. ========after ifconfig========== Now it works. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 16:10:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398BB16A418 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:10:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF0A13C4E7 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:10:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0MG7l00001357; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:07:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0MG7gv8001354; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:07:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:07:42 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Mark Tinguely In-Reply-To: <200801221424.m0MEOsjX088736@casselton.net> Message-ID: <20080122170220.Y1140@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <200801221424.m0MEOsjX088736@casselton.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: oceanare@pacific.net.sg, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:10:24 -0000 > Living just outside of Fargo, I find this interesting. I guess I better > not telnet to service ports to make sure HTTP/SMTP/IMAP/IPOP servers > are running. it looks like slowly microsoft is doing their work - to change "internet" to webbrowsing with everything else forbidden. > > Admininstratively, the Zone transfers should be restricted to secondary of course, i do this, everyone who at least read documentation - do this too. > peers. If a person constructed the walls of their house out of glass, > how can you complain that the neighbors that are capable of moving their > heads of watching you at night? you don't have to tell me (and others). and the question is not if, but WHEN will we all be forced to use just one type of computers, one operating system, one type of given program BY LAW. Poland are not communist country since 1989, but for how long? how about other countries? what i think about such actions is that it's turning back to communism, just not saying this. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 16:10:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8890516A421 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:10:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7012213C45A for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:10:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403ADEBC84; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:10:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:10:34 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: Wojciech Puchar Message-Id: <20080122111034.f95d3276.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20080122170018.G1140@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4795F048.3090501@pacific.net.sg> <20080122145708.S2543@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4795F9F1.1010603@student.utwente.nl> <20080122170018.G1140@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD, "Alphons \"Fonz\" van Werven" , Questions Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:10:36 -0000 In response to Wojciech Puchar : > > Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > >> Orwell should just change title from "1984" to "2010-15" > > > > Maybe it's just me, but this whole thing kinda feels like somebody > > walking around the house naked and then suing an innocent passer-by > > for seeing them naked. > > > > Oh my, this is so ridiculous... > > no it is EXACTLY like that! http://www.potentialtech.com/cms/node/59 -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 16:13:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A37716A47B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:13:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perlcat@alltel.net) Received: from ispmxmta06-srv.windstream.net (ispmxmta06-srv.windstream.net [166.102.165.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B295E13C459 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:13:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perlcat@alltel.net) Received: from ispmxaamta08-gx.windstream.net ([72.37.126.241]) by ispmxmta06-srv.windstream.net with ESMTP id <20080122161343.PIWS15841.ispmxmta06-srv.windstream.net@ispmxaamta08-gx.windstream.net> for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:13:43 -0600 Received: from ext-b14-241.omhq.uprr.com ([72.37.126.241]) by ispmxaamta08-gx.windstream.net with ESMTP id <20080122161339.EMEQ27517.ispmxaamta08-gx.windstream.net@ext-b14-241.omhq.uprr.com> for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:13:39 -0600 From: perlcat Organization: dis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:10:12 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4795F9F1.1010603@student.utwente.nl> <20080122170018.G1140@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080122170018.G1140@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801221010.12767.perlcat@alltel.net> Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:13:45 -0000 On Tuesday 22 January 2008 10:01:49 Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >> Orwell should just change title from "1984" to "2010-15" > > > > Maybe it's just me, but this whole thing kinda feels like somebody > > walking around the house naked and then suing an innocent passer-by > > for seeing them naked. > > > > Oh my, this is so ridiculous... > > no it is EXACTLY like that! > Except that I can understand why the problem viewing Windows in the naked metaphor -- it'd be a lot like being sued by Ernest Borgnine for looking at him naked -- I'd be so busy gouging my eyes out that I wouldn't even notice getting served with papers. For the common good, for your sanity, for the good of your possible descendants, DON'T LOOK!!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 16:26:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E1FC16A4A7 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:26:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg (smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5BA813C447 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:26:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 16363 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2008 16:26:04 -0000 Received: from adsl181.dyn229.pacific.net.sg (HELO P2120.somewherefaraway.com) (oceanare@210.24.229.181) by smtpgate1.pacific.net.sg with ESMTPA; 22 Jan 2008 16:26:03 -0000 Message-ID: <47961909.3070701@pacific.net.sg> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:25:45 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070826) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar References: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4795F048.3090501@pacific.net.sg> <20080122145708.S2543@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20080122145708.S2543@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:26:07 -0000 Hi check google: http://www.google.com/search?q=illegale+hackertools&btnG=Search&hl=en The problem will be that the repsective articles will all be in German. Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>> jest first step to criminalize unix at all >> >> first step? >> >> Many Unix tools are considered illegal by German law since last summer. >> > > could you mail me more about it ? > > > can you type ls? ;) I do not know if I can still answer this question as using a hacker tool can lead to get a nice place in a lovely prison. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 16:27:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6437616A417 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (filter2-tmobile.zx.nl [194.187.76.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E46813C4DB for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:27:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1241C72FC for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:27:19 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zx.nl Received: from filter2-tmobile.zx.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (filter2.zx.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10127) with ESMTP id kazz3kWTsJ5Q for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:27:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [89.205.133.194]) by filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:27:12 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47961988.4080602@student.utwente.nl> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:27:52 +0000 From: "Alphons \"Fonz\" van Werven" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4795F048.3090501@pacific.net.sg> <20080122145708.S2543@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4795F9F1.1010603@student.utwente.nl> <20080122170018.G1140@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080122111034.f95d3276.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20080122111034.f95d3276.wmoran@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:27:23 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: >>> Maybe it's just me, but this whole thing kinda feels like somebody >>> walking around the house naked and then suing an innocent passer-by >>> for seeing them naked. >> no it is EXACTLY like that! Not quite. Seeing somebody naked because they're stupid enough to run around the house in the nude is no excuse for breaking in and raping said idiot. That being said, imho it's the breaking in and raping that should be punished, not the having your eyes open. Alphons P.S. Sorry for replying to the wrong message, but I lost the original. -- VISTA - Viruses Intruders Spyware Trojans Adware From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 16:29:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A50516A46D for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:29:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7728A13C442 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:29:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l8so1387694nzf.13 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:29:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.110.32.9 with SMTP id f9mr3749621tif.32.1201019366276; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:29:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.100.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i12sm17124631wxd.31.2008.01.22.08.29.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:29:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from dogmatix (dogmatix [192.168.17.31]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7AC01140D for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:29:18 +0400 (GST) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:29:18 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801220259x1b7dd4efw7a8fc1e8a60d2cc9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080122202158.R45709@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> References: <94136a2c0801220259x1b7dd4efw7a8fc1e8a60d2cc9@mail.gmail.com> X-Blog: http://rakhesh.com/ X-Notes: http://rakhesh.net/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Subject: Re: pflogd log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:29:29 -0000 > I noticed that pflog is not being written to. > > $ l /var/log/pflog > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 60 Jan 22 00:00 /var/log/pflog > > However, the process running pflogd runs as _pflogd. Does this mean I > should chown the log file with user _pflogd? I don't think so. Had a look at my machine, /var/log/pflog has permissions like on yours. > _pflogd 248 0.0 0.2 1632 1056 ?? S 6:49AM 0:01.31 > pflogd: [suspended] -s 116 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd) > > To complete the picture: > > $ ps aux |grep pf > root 36 0.0 0.0 0 8 ?? DL 6:49AM 0:01.04 [softdepflush] > root 246 0.0 0.2 1568 1004 ?? Is 6:49AM 0:00.01 > pflogd: [priv] (pflogd) > _pflogd 248 0.0 0.2 1632 1056 ?? S 6:49AM 0:01.32 > pflogd: [suspended] -s 116 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd) I don't have pflogd: [suspended] though. Its pflogd: [running] for me. Have you tried restart /etc/rc.d/pflog? Sorry, couldn't be of much help. Regards, Rakhesh --- http://rakhesh.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 16:45:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3655016A417 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:45:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C4D13C44B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:45:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so499544nfb.33 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:45:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=AI40tarDs2wjDDVl5E1Qc1C09Mj2QEpIAFA6zbw7BK8=; b=eIPRcnGLD6RRThfhD3O+JM9APb4Y2VohucvFzJ4brV8/DJ+7/wbOiweXPcllU7Gm1esUZYi4nwMlIMCv04iMZtX5eelwE43M79+QatPDZVFPHlxvmQUrxx718Rm/P9BDBHN2+0HKPY+NMo/6/2BDR/DvVOhThFGcD4uyoN44ClU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RNsiIJnl9GsxNBw8NWlQTCEXxUsn/a0uHqCtbR0pefAp3heGo82bzmyOUiKzSfpnVXB8WCchalT4BBAHUilTjE71IEMgCKsBsd2IVEYS4ZeaFRiCF9fZ6tWHDA5cYW1ML8cVBuflEd0pdUH+iX1hadECk5A8CJyUEZcM7OODKY0= Received: by 10.78.100.1 with SMTP id x1mr11526645hub.45.1201020352846; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:45:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:45:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801220845w6bbf50c9q7ba59052c72e871d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:45:52 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: "Rakhesh Sasidharan" In-Reply-To: <20080122202158.R45709@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <94136a2c0801220259x1b7dd4efw7a8fc1e8a60d2cc9@mail.gmail.com> <20080122202158.R45709@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pflogd log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:45:56 -0000 Hello, 2008/1/22, Rakhesh Sasidharan : > > > I noticed that pflog is not being written to. > > > > $ l /var/log/pflog > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 60 Jan 22 00:00 /var/log/pflog > > > > However, the process running pflogd runs as _pflogd. Does this mean I > > should chown the log file with user _pflogd? > > I don't think so. Had a look at my machine, /var/log/pflog has permissions > like on yours. > > > _pflogd 248 0.0 0.2 1632 1056 ?? S 6:49AM 0:01.31 > > pflogd: [suspended] -s 116 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd) > > > > To complete the picture: > > > > $ ps aux |grep pf > > root 36 0.0 0.0 0 8 ?? DL 6:49AM 0:01.04 [softdepflush] > > root 246 0.0 0.2 1568 1004 ?? Is 6:49AM 0:00.01 > > pflogd: [priv] (pflogd) > > _pflogd 248 0.0 0.2 1632 1056 ?? S 6:49AM 0:01.32 > > pflogd: [suspended] -s 116 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd) > > I don't have pflogd: [suspended] though. Its pflogd: [running] for me. > Have you tried restart /etc/rc.d/pflog? Thanks! Need to find out what is going on. Have restarted pflogd but it is still showing suspend for me. Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 17:15:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D4F16A46E for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:15:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC0C13C47E for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:15:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l8so1400053nzf.13 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:15:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.110.68.10 with SMTP id q10mr3823254tia.22.1201022117889; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:15:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.100.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h39sm33072686wxd.14.2008.01.22.09.15.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:15:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from dogmatix (dogmatix [192.168.17.31]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EE91140D; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:15:02 +0400 (GST) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:15:02 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com To: Zbigniew Szalbot In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801220845w6bbf50c9q7ba59052c72e871d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080122211202.Q45709@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> References: <94136a2c0801220259x1b7dd4efw7a8fc1e8a60d2cc9@mail.gmail.com> <20080122202158.R45709@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> <94136a2c0801220845w6bbf50c9q7ba59052c72e871d@mail.gmail.com> X-Blog: http://rakhesh.com/ X-Notes: http://rakhesh.net/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pflogd log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:15:21 -0000 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Hello, > > 2008/1/22, Rakhesh Sasidharan : >> >>> I noticed that pflog is not being written to. >>> >>> $ l /var/log/pflog >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 60 Jan 22 00:00 /var/log/pflog >>> >>> However, the process running pflogd runs as _pflogd. Does this mean I >>> should chown the log file with user _pflogd? >> >> I don't think so. Had a look at my machine, /var/log/pflog has permissions >> like on yours. >> >>> _pflogd 248 0.0 0.2 1632 1056 ?? S 6:49AM 0:01.31 >>> pflogd: [suspended] -s 116 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd) >>> >>> To complete the picture: >>> >>> $ ps aux |grep pf >>> root 36 0.0 0.0 0 8 ?? DL 6:49AM 0:01.04 [softdepflush] >>> root 246 0.0 0.2 1568 1004 ?? Is 6:49AM 0:00.01 >>> pflogd: [priv] (pflogd) >>> _pflogd 248 0.0 0.2 1632 1056 ?? S 6:49AM 0:01.32 >>> pflogd: [suspended] -s 116 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd) >> >> I don't have pflogd: [suspended] though. Its pflogd: [running] for me. >> Have you tried restart /etc/rc.d/pflog? > > Thanks! Need to find out what is going on. Have restarted pflogd but > it is still showing suspend for me. Try sending the pflogd process a HUP or ALRM signal. That should do the trick. Funny how I missed it the first time, but I had a look at the pflogd(8) manpage once again and it talks about this problem. This is the para just above the options section. Let me know how it goes. Also, just noticed now that my /var/log/pflog file doesn't have read perms for the others group. Would suggest removing that and trying again. Possible the extra perms are an issue. Regards, Rakhesh --- http://rakhesh.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 17:32:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F8616A4A0 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:32:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF5B13C447 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:32:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 68so924480wra.13 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:32:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.222.21 with SMTP id u21mr4216655wfg.189.1201023122264; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:32:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio ( [67.189.206.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 34sm9038649wra.23.2008.01.22.09.32.00 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:32:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:31:49 -0500 From: Gerard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080122123149.05837a85@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q User-Agent: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.3; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/pBldCe39xMWQdnezOVXd.//"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:32:05 -0000 --Sig_/pBldCe39xMWQdnezOVXd.// Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:03:27 +0100 (CET) Wojciech Puchar wrote: > http://www.spamsuite.com/node/351 >=20 > jest first step to criminalize unix at all No really. This case involved an individual who was accessing and acquiring information using falsified credentials for an apparent nefarious purpose. If you have a key making machine, does that give you the right to make a key to my home and then enter it without my permission? It is not the 'tool' that is being addressed here; but rather, what the individual did with it. If this individual believed what he was purported to by doing was legal and above board, then why did he openly commit perjury and use falsified credentials? Quite frankly, it is criminals like him who cause other lawful individuals problems. --=20 Gerard gerard@seibercom.net Using TSO is like kicking a dead whale down the beach. S. C. Johnson --Sig_/pBldCe39xMWQdnezOVXd.// Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkeWKIYACgkQ6DWTaTcTwMmZYQCgmTEbjSOMjxTACEMhOBYK4ZKs Y9MAniWp0ibwKVk0TIbsN7WkRLKQkDff =nd/p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/pBldCe39xMWQdnezOVXd.//-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 17:38:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93F716A418 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:38:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB4E13C44B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:38:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BDFEBC84; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:38:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:38:47 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20080122123847.4e64b00e.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20080122123149.05837a85@scorpio> References: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080122123149.05837a85@scorpio> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:38:49 -0000 In response to Gerard : > On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:03:27 +0100 (CET) > Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > http://www.spamsuite.com/node/351 > > > > jest first step to criminalize unix at all > > No really. This case involved an individual who was accessing and > acquiring information using falsified credentials for an apparent > nefarious purpose. > > If you have a key making machine, does that give you the right to make > a key to my home and then enter it without my permission? It is not the > 'tool' that is being addressed here; but rather, what the individual > did with it. If this individual believed what he was purported to by > doing was legal and above board, then why did he openly commit perjury > and use falsified credentials? Quite frankly, it is criminals like him > who cause other lawful individuals problems. That's exactly the point. You are correct that it's the action, not the tool, that is criminal. However, it's being pushed all over the world to outlaw the _tools_. And this case leaves a lot of ambiguity that hints that the tools themselves are criminal in nature. I think most everyone, me included, is concerned about that possible side-effect. As far as the cracker, I hope he gets the chair. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 17:44:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218C416A417 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:44:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from filter1-tmobile.zx.nl (filter1-tmobile.zx.nl [194.187.76.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBEF913C4DB for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:44:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filter1-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033ECD4172 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:44:10 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zx.nl Received: from filter1-tmobile.zx.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (filter1.zx.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10127) with ESMTP id rxKLDfDOQfLo for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:44:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [89.205.133.194]) by filter1-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:44:00 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47962B85.50805@student.utwente.nl> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:44:37 +0000 From: "Alphons \"Fonz\" van Werven" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: FreeBSD Questions References: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080122123149.05837a85@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20080122123149.05837a85@scorpio> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:44:10 -0000 Gerard wrote: > It is not the 'tool' that is being addressed here; but rather, what the > individual did with it. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. Ritz's behavior in conducting a zone transfer was unauthorized within the meaning of the North Dakota Computer Crime Law. Alphons -- VISTA - Viruses Intruders Spyware Trojans Adware From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 17:45:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1878A16A418 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:45:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB8813C442 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:45:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so516586nfb.33 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:45:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=TYtonvwptVknHR0INFa+GGnD2NRG84lGvE/dfs8ZRtI=; b=uMv6r73m18PWQDsOG0OF76X8tZj9J2FLuDo9zxXFBCNm/Y1DmqgTSvqgl3kCtgGGkROlft4VB3bDtZqqJH46pX8SSJfaoy6sM03/dLwhKXV9ZJRYTKPltZ3uBqEv+W9cpGnuGvf4wgTNSr82i0nM+5CoiDZmmOtorZJQHiRKBk8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=F8ymIdJeYifcW32t4X3S5tWLQipshTjahc7L5T8dEffBF0QxVL/7zIhtutEB9GxV7ywCxn+UMbzPkGS8vFiPz1X1RNSyPQQQaFtifMwIxLr1O06ck0ZxXRP3bf6IHfIJuc79IUnBs3d9VHi8seP8PhbMhEghKs7TFRaw2/zgVzU= Received: by 10.78.131.8 with SMTP id e8mr11652510hud.52.1201023929856; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:45:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:45:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801220945j164eaf9clffeeda7186242cd1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:45:29 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: "Rakhesh Sasidharan" In-Reply-To: <20080122211202.Q45709@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <94136a2c0801220259x1b7dd4efw7a8fc1e8a60d2cc9@mail.gmail.com> <20080122202158.R45709@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> <94136a2c0801220845w6bbf50c9q7ba59052c72e871d@mail.gmail.com> <20080122211202.Q45709@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pflogd log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:45:32 -0000 Hello, 2008/1/22, Rakhesh Sasidharan : > Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > 2008/1/22, Rakhesh Sasidharan : > >> > >>> I noticed that pflog is not being written to. > >>> > >>> $ l /var/log/pflog > >>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 60 Jan 22 00:00 /var/log/pflog > >>> > >>> However, the process running pflogd runs as _pflogd. Does this mean I > >>> should chown the log file with user _pflogd? > >> > >> I don't think so. Had a look at my machine, /var/log/pflog has permissions > >> like on yours. > >> > >>> _pflogd 248 0.0 0.2 1632 1056 ?? S 6:49AM 0:01.31 > >>> pflogd: [suspended] -s 116 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd) > >>> > >>> To complete the picture: > >>> > >>> $ ps aux |grep pf > >>> root 36 0.0 0.0 0 8 ?? DL 6:49AM 0:01.04 [softdepflush] > >>> root 246 0.0 0.2 1568 1004 ?? Is 6:49AM 0:00.01 > >>> pflogd: [priv] (pflogd) > >>> _pflogd 248 0.0 0.2 1632 1056 ?? S 6:49AM 0:01.32 > >>> pflogd: [suspended] -s 116 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd) > >> > >> I don't have pflogd: [suspended] though. Its pflogd: [running] for me. > >> Have you tried restart /etc/rc.d/pflog? > > > > Thanks! Need to find out what is going on. Have restarted pflogd but > > it is still showing suspend for me. > > Try sending the pflogd process a HUP or ALRM signal. That should do the > trick. Funny how I missed it the first time, but I had a look at the > pflogd(8) manpage once again and it talks about this problem. > > This is the para just above the options section. > > Let me know how it goes. > > Also, just noticed now that my /var/log/pflog file doesn't have read perms > for the others group. Would suggest removing that and trying again. > Possible the extra perms are an issue. I do not know. l /var/log/pflog -rw------- 1 root wheel 60 Jan 22 00:00 /var/log/pflog $ ps ax |grep pflog 25478 ?? Is 0:00.01 pflogd: [priv] (pflogd) 25479 ?? S 0:00.03 pflogd: [suspended] -s 116 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd) 25561 p0 S+ 0:00.01 grep pflog Not really sure what is going on. I tried: kill -HUP 25479 but to no avail. Thanks! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 18:06:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4464016A417 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:06:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F167513C4D1 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:06:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1435345wxd.7 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:06:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.226.2 with SMTP id y2mr4283048wfg.64.1201025196300; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:06:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio ( [67.189.206.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 39sm14779369wrl.32.2008.01.22.10.06.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:06:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:06:30 -0500 From: Gerard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080122130630.53b0e624@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <47962B85.50805@student.utwente.nl> References: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080122123149.05837a85@scorpio> <47962B85.50805@student.utwente.nl> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q User-Agent: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.3; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/iRcFhiIllhJUtWl1FEGVD3Z"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:06:39 -0000 --Sig_/iRcFhiIllhJUtWl1FEGVD3Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:44:37 +0000 "Alphons \"Fonz\" van Werven" wrote: > Gerard wrote: >=20 > > It is not the 'tool' that is being addressed here; but rather, what > > the individual did with it. >=20 > CONCLUSIONS OF LAW >=20 > 1. Ritz's behavior in conducting a zone transfer was unauthorized > within the meaning of the North Dakota Computer Crime Law. That is precisely what I am referring to. Bill Moran makes a rather pointed comment: As far as the cracker, I hope he gets the chair. While that may seem slightly harsh, at least for a first offense, it does point up the fact that people like Ritz are a blight upon the legitimate computer users community. --=20 Gerard gerard@seibercom.net You can rent this space for only $5 a week. --Sig_/iRcFhiIllhJUtWl1FEGVD3Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkeWMKcACgkQ6DWTaTcTwMkUDwCfUvxEQ/zZwmwu2SPQIdtnxqlR qPsAn0g3TfKzKNvW8puNMbWXVd/I1kY0 =Unu6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/iRcFhiIllhJUtWl1FEGVD3Z-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 18:24:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D6F16A418 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:24:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp3.utdallas.edu (smtp3.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E288A13C457 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:24:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp3.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0F2654FE for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:24:51 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:24:50 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <7FBCA209CD1A8EEDB978FFBB@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:24:52 -0000 --On Tuesday, January 22, 2008 13:03:27 +0100 Wojciech Puchar wrote: > http://www.spamsuite.com/node/351 > > jest first step to criminalize unix at all > _______________________________________________ We aren't criminals, but *he* is. -- Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 18:26:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B0D16A421 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:26:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (filter2-tmobile.zx.nl [194.187.76.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9877413C4E7 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:26:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317DF1C730E for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:26:08 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zx.nl Received: from filter2-tmobile.zx.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (filter2.zx.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10127) with ESMTP id PABqUTsTeDjE for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:25:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [89.205.133.194]) by filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:25:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47963534.2010203@student.utwente.nl> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:25:56 +0000 From: "Alphons \"Fonz\" van Werven" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions References: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080122123149.05837a85@scorpio> <47962B85.50805@student.utwente.nl> <20080122130630.53b0e624@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20080122130630.53b0e624@scorpio> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:26:11 -0000 Gerard wrote: > While that may seem slightly harsh, at least for a first offense, it > does point up the fact that people like Ritz are a blight upon the > legitimate computer users community. Agreed. But upon looking at something like this... 4. Ritz frequently accomplished his access to Sierra's computers by concealing his identity via proxies and by accessing the servers via a Unix operating system and using a shell accounts, among other methods. ...I really get the feeling that, besides (justly) convicting Ritz for what he did, they seem under the impression that UNIX as a whole is evil and good for nothing but "hacking" (as most people unfortunately call it). Alphons -- VISTA - Viruses Intruders Spyware Trojans Adware From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 18:44:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 792CE16A47B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:44:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1611013C457 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:44:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0MIftsl002209 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:41:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0MIfto1002206 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:41:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:41:55 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080122130630.53b0e624@scorpio> Message-ID: <20080122194136.H2205@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20080122123149.05837a85@scorpio> <47962B85.50805@student.utwente.nl> <20080122130630.53b0e624@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:44:44 -0000 > > > > While that may seem slightly harsh, at least for a first offense, it > does point up the fact that people like Ritz are a blight upon the > legitimate computer users community. > what about all these idiots in courts and goverments we all pay huge taxes for? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 14:33:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8944416A418 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:33:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julien.baumgarten@epitech.net) Received: from postfix1-g20.free.fr (postfix1-g20.free.fr [212.27.60.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDA413C448 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:33:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julien.baumgarten@epitech.net) Received: from smtp6-g19.free.fr (smtp6-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.36]) by postfix1-g20.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F6D21C5DC2 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:13:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp6-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D7E15FE6C for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:13:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (bro67-4-88-160-70-239.fbx.proxad.net [88.160.70.239]) by smtp6-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8105FE99 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:13:40 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4795F97A.80701@epitech.net> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:11:06 +0100 From: Baumgarten Julien User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 080122-0, 22/01/2008), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:45:08 +0000 Cc: Subject: Ask from an Epitech student X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: julien.baumgarten@epitech.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:33:55 -0000 Dear Sir, i'm actually a student in an IT school (Epitech) and i would like to organise a Discovery day. I would like people to discover the FreeBSD products. Can i organise something and can i speak with a french people which will can help me? Thank you Julien From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 19:15:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F5416A41A for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:15:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4128C13C461 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:15:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0MJCSXI002392; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:12:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0MJCJ3f002389; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:12:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:12:19 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Baumgarten Julien In-Reply-To: <4795F97A.80701@epitech.net> Message-ID: <20080122201209.R2388@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <4795F97A.80701@epitech.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ask from an Epitech student X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:15:40 -0000 > Dear Sir, > > i'm actually a student in an IT school (Epitech) and i would like to organise > a Discovery day. > I would like people to discover the FreeBSD products. > Can i organise something and can i speak with a french people which will can > help me? of course. come on and do it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 19:41:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19A0116A41B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:41:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq@peterk.org) Received: from poshta.pknet.net (poshta.pknet.net [216.241.167.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ADCA313C458 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq@peterk.org) Received: (qmail 87172 invoked by uid 98); 22 Jan 2008 19:43:06 -0000 Received: from 216.241.167.213 by poshta.pknet.net (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.91.2/5145. spamassassin: 3.2.3. Clear:RC:1(216.241.167.213):. Processed in 0.053834 secs); 22 Jan 2008 19:43:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.pknet.net) (216.241.167.213) by poshta.pknet.net with SMTP; 22 Jan 2008 19:43:05 -0000 Received: from 63.65.46.186 (SquirrelMail authenticated user fbsdq@peterk.org) by webmail.pknet.net with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:43:05 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <3292.63.65.46.186.1201030985.squirrel@webmail.pknet.net> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:43:05 -0700 (MST) From: "Peter" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: apache coredump / segfault in 7.0-beta2/4/RC1- php/mhash. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:41:05 -0000 iH, apache13 segfaults/coredump on FreeBSD 7-RC with php mhash extension enabled, works fine on 6.3 [several boxes, fresh install 6 and 7]. [with or without latest cvsup RELENG_7 build/install world/kernel] apache13 php-5.2.5 mhash-0.9.9 php5-mhash-5.2.5 [ and all the other required libraries/etc ] this was installed via 'make config install' in more or less the above order; [and tested on a fresh box via pkg_add -r also] both ways, apache segfaults and dumps core /httpd.core, with that mhash php extension disabled, it works in 7, otherwise only in 6.x. This is a default install of 7-RC1.iso, portsnap fetch extract, make install; Same process on 6.3, apache works, no segfault/coredump. I've tested this several times and reloaded OS many times [under VMWare and a physical box - latest RELENG_7 cvsup/buildworld as of about Saturday/19th.] ]Peter[ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 21:25:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D26116A41B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:25:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6415F13C45D for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:25:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so3780700pyb.10 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:25:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=YVryX56cJMnpShROhXOcXnMKckDBzxjT2b6E3XgZPNg=; b=XVOMLN69Q6li+Ykj2mNFL9rFGLSKq16EBRQMA0uCk94cMyX3I1EvXCjZmO9m3OC03PKyjZ1ZUhgpxWPhDkKbUTbmc/8tjuQF+YNtXYUW+MBryS/SEElXE4DbD/vjhf+InzXnMEKqMAVMYp4bMgpyi1BKt8ErS5ACz9mqqklN1to= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=kh5toKK5e03tBJBzdiW2oSRWXaZF36NNqym/JCd/UN4fItsChalmJZmrK6C7kY8op/lAjLLbYe0ZqQnMIUehHJYsXLJau3+FxcvCYuZTV4z5xnXmXtwU/J9O44FDLellmYRDHTPFwDGt21jf0wxfPdSTbpm5aqwe9UpAglCqH1s= Received: by 10.35.103.6 with SMTP id f6mr9929356pym.45.1201037117659; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:25:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.109.18 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:25:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:25:17 -0300 From: Agus To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Sendmail local only..... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:25:18 -0000 Hi guys, Just trying to make sendmail work locally only.....And by that i mean, i dont want sendmail to be able to relay or send mail to any other machine except for localhost.... How can i do this? I mean is there a way on rc.conf or i need to touch the cf?? Thanks in advance and cheers, Agustin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 21:28:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151D416A421 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:28:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E935513C447 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:28:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schiz0phrenic21@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so4612416waf.3 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:28:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=30/OASklIAQPSYQUetNug4r1fzO1NAz+NMfqv794C4s=; b=cNGJwYrvJueeFJ5y3nSV3IKchdSVEqNQVWVUUsSitJEzDf0IWYVBZExpxrWasfNExsprobihpGJmPAO9v80wi5PIAfpXwq4GD2gI01+sWMicGgoNrAkO3uExxO5zvNMuNzIfqRwiyLt75tNIgS87S9MBj/QcoJ0CW4WipE3Muk0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Owt1DksjyXk8CIkXzH3noKKAPnwzPVC2/TTTYJhu6l0wQEG3qK6XeNOC/2gDsko4y0dapCr286EvVMY9/RgXsXUOAVXIxZu+Q+7+MTmxVRF8bSBQSsLvvd6oXIXV1hHh8ZwkQ3rhC9t4l3cKubhfIc3b6gFJ3uiN1kAIlqcjFL8= Received: by 10.114.209.1 with SMTP id h1mr10105029wag.115.1201037318107; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:28:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.52.14 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:28:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8d23ec860801221328s601bade5qab86280cd0441ffb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:28:38 -0500 From: Schiz0 To: Agus In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Sendmail local only..... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:28:39 -0000 On Jan 22, 2008 4:25 PM, Agus wrote: > Hi guys, > > Just trying to make sendmail work locally only.....And by that i mean, i > dont want sendmail to be able to relay or send mail to any other machine > except for localhost.... > > How can i do this? I mean is there a way on rc.conf or i need to touch the > cf?? > > Thanks in advance and cheers, > Agustin Search the file /etc/defaults/rc.conf for "sendmail" It has a bunch of options and explains what they do. NOTE: do not edit /etc/defaults/rc.conf - that's just the "Default settings" file. Make any changes in the /etc/rc.conf file instead. Basically, you want sendmail_enable="NO" And the rest of the sendmail options enabled. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 22:01:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1856416A420 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:01:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@sigd.net) Received: from ms05.mailstreet2003.net (ms05.mailstreet2003.net [69.25.50.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB1913C45A for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:01:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@sigd.net) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:49:51 -0500 Message-ID: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2210120D5E@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: mfsbsd Thread-Index: AchdQLd+RsBPy6ijTCGhPzvtyNHVvQ== From: "Chris Haulmark" To: Subject: mfsbsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:01:19 -0000 Hello, Anyone used mfsbsd to do remote install of a dedicated server with success? Summary: A dedicated server has FreeBSD 6.x running with / as the entire partition of the entire disk. Hoping to find a solution to do reinstall remotely. depenguinator seems incompatible with the current latest FreeBSD releases. Advices other than "DRAC, IPKM or hire a tech" are welcome. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 22:07:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123EB16A468 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:07:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC26213C4D1 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:07:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id D3C8C28453; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:07:25 -0500 (EST) To: Agus References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:07:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Agus's message of "Tue\, 22 Jan 2008 18\:25\:17 -0300") Message-ID: <44ir1l4iqq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Sendmail local only..... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:07:27 -0000 Agus writes: > Just trying to make sendmail work locally only.....And by that i mean, i > dont want sendmail to be able to relay or send mail to any other machine > except for localhost.... > > How can i do this? I mean is there a way on rc.conf or i need to touch the > cf?? This is a very standard thing to do. See "man 8 sendmail.conf" (as recommended by the rc.conf(8) manual). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 22:32:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF7116A41A for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:32:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985E213C447 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:32:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0MMTnqE002889; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:29:49 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0MMTkSR002886; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:29:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:29:46 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Chris Haulmark In-Reply-To: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2210120D5E@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> Message-ID: <20080122232910.K2862@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2210120D5E@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mfsbsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:32:12 -0000 > Anyone used mfsbsd to do remote install of a dedicated server with > success? > > Summary: > > A dedicated server has FreeBSD 6.x running with / as the entire > partition of the entire disk. Hoping to find a solution to do reinstall > remotely. it is already running freebsd? no need any extra tool to reinstall it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 22:33:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9B716A417 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:33:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hoschi@etain.frida.mouhaha.de) Received: from etain.frida.mouhaha.de (etain.frida.mouhaha.de [85.236.48.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123C213C447 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:33:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hoschi@etain.frida.mouhaha.de) Received: from localhost (etain.frida.mouhaha.de [85.236.48.54]) by etain.frida.mouhaha.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E853C4BB931 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:33:19 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mouhaha.de Received: from etain.frida.mouhaha.de ([85.236.48.54]) by localhost (etain.frida.mouhaha.de [85.236.48.54]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lk1OK+QYi0bL for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:33:19 +0100 (CET) Received: by etain.frida.mouhaha.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C22144BB919; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:33:18 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:33:18 +0100 From: Oliver Peter To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080122223318.GB25065@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE" Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p10 i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Subject: USB / umass / automount X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:33:22 -0000 --bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, What is currently the best way to attach and detach umass-devices automatically? Bye Oliver --=20 Oliver PETER, email: hoschi@mouhaha.de, ICQ# 113969174 "Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away. The Queen is their slave." --bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkeWby4ACgkQ6LH/IUVtaI/0awCeLrzY2fRHbkNBSec01DIFjf5l 434AoIb69MrXsPFjpBDdGexdGUiy6PMn =bDC6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bCsyhTFzCvuiizWE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 22:48:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB1E16A41B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:48:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from canito@dalan.us) Received: from netbits.us (ptr-89.fastconcepts.net [209.18.107.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C0E1E13C458 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:48:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from canito@dalan.us) Received: (qmail 22411 invoked by uid 65534); 22 Jan 2008 22:48:13 -0000 Received: from 64.122.68.138 ([64.122.68.138]) by mail.dalan.us (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:48:13 -0600 Message-ID: <20080122164813.mdeiowakg0cco0os@mail.dalan.us> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:48:13 -0600 From: David Alanis To: Oliver Peter References: <20080122223318.GB25065@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> In-Reply-To: <20080122223318.GB25065@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.4) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB / umass / automount X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:48:16 -0000 Quoting Oliver Peter : > Hi, > > What is currently the best way to attach and detach umass-devices > automatically? > > Bye > Oliver > > -- > Oliver PETER, email: hoschi@mouhaha.de, ICQ# 113969174 > "Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away. > The Queen is their slave." > Could you just edit your fstab to have: /dev/umass-device /umass /umass-type auto 0 0 and umount /umass when ever you need to? David ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 22:56:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3831416A41B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:56:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F074713C46B for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:56:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1533095wxd.7 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:56:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; bh=w3l3jbPhIUDgQ4a2gAUv/nqpPmfWeazU9A0JmjDGJro=; b=gceTasxT+eSzySS3gC5NmHyueC3tNi9TLpL8mk4TtovKgz0+deQMzEObpVNhnEkB2q4wj2j2iU6n41s2XZ0zFuoCLUq/JNMxEHnSAhjYzL5Cvf2cdADjnsDy/d8IDbQUkzXdFGujHfZ9XA49+rFdntSiyKJPRCkUt9clJdMcxZo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=tdILYel9I9bIt/4zTb39OmqH6JW+Db/ZPtd28KgxcifQ5e19YupEi5bQrsxBkBum+afmt3nXSU2b4o4uXWDw4fAv+pg2xcSEcKRBxM7BnRlxlQzRp0rrc/vZ0GPW+kKg9SOgtx3wMvax46SJiqxflr1thBL8tE4yYH9zp29q3zE= Received: by 10.142.212.19 with SMTP id k19mr3255827wfg.154.1201042566429; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:56:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.194.10 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:56:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <539c60b90801221456t6b54d61fjb742b65138cdbdc6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:56:06 -0700 From: "Steve Franks" Sender: bahamasfranks@gmail.com To: "User Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9aecc872d60ebf4c Subject: x11 missing modules on 7.0rc1 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stevefranks@ieee.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:56:08 -0000 Maybe I missed something critical, but I just decided to give 7.0rc1 a shot, did a standard x-user install on a fresh system (older 1.3GHz laptop), went smoothly, but startx reports "(EE) Failed to load module "mouse" (modules does not exist, 0)", (and kbd, and radeon) which seems a tad strange. If it's really not an issue where I forgot to RTFM somewhere, I thought I'd post it so it can be looked at. I'm now in the process of reinstalling xorg from the metaport...don't see any earlier posts on this topic, so I must be an idiot here somewhere... Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 22:58:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240AA16A417 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:58:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6BC13C458 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:58:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1533880wxd.7 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:58:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; bh=bsPzqdLocDzR7ExXVHKpYwNFNSSFyKJthF8qFmmzywo=; b=chlyfPs4US1EK9we+Ya2Hqw0N0iAUrTWbl6WM8EbvCOjml07InB8y/XUGE64urvX4fbvdIeA/ln7giyNCE/nlyaCNRykwnjpLuzTGl8UNscN9UyrdrXwu3N3Z5dTyMDk+koKA9fGhYoYWZODmx1mwqMsm10SWM7EuQqelzLHiO4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=Sf4P5zh19rMi6ZuDXCPDhQWGYz/rPmLBtYGbujD+H6XQuPjRcargCiQE1ylT55itJR36t7j8lH3942q2i95w1PHt2UxyuN0fBhiEXq90uWUH8o8RJB6DHXomifakqQgMPna5xTsi1IvZsRT0mBR2cS2mY00uehqpQMS+V7AElck= Received: by 10.142.178.13 with SMTP id a13mr4511538wff.196.1201042716544; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:58:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.194.10 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:58:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <539c60b90801221458y3f5e7092v2ccae7b36cb76b55@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:58:36 -0700 From: "Steve Franks" Sender: bahamasfranks@gmail.com To: "User Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: a890e0f8c81baa54 Subject: update: x11 missing modules on 7.0rc1 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stevefranks@ieee.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:58:38 -0000 On Jan 22, 2008 3:56 PM, Steve Franks wrote: > Maybe I missed something critical, but I just decided to give 7.0rc1 a > shot, did a standard x-user install on a fresh system (older 1.3GHz > laptop), went smoothly, but startx reports "(EE) Failed to load module > "mouse" (modules does not exist, 0)", (and kbd, and radeon) which > seems a tad strange. If it's really not an issue where I forgot to > RTFM somewhere, I thought I'd post it so it can be looked at. I'm now > in the process of reinstalling xorg from the metaport...don't see any > earlier posts on this topic, so I must be an idiot here somewhere... > > Steve > Looks like I don't have an xorgcfg script anywhere either - something must've went south with the install, although I didn't notice any errors... Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 23:02:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59BD16A41A for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:02:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from canito@dalan.us) Received: from netbits.us (ptr-89.fastconcepts.net [209.18.107.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BCB013C4CC for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:02:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from canito@dalan.us) Received: (qmail 27600 invoked by uid 65534); 22 Jan 2008 23:02:13 -0000 Received: from 64.122.68.138 ([64.122.68.138]) by mail.dalan.us (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:02:13 -0600 Message-ID: <20080122170213.astw529woo8w00gg@mail.dalan.us> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:02:13 -0600 From: David Alanis To: stevefranks@ieee.org References: <539c60b90801221456t6b54d61fjb742b65138cdbdc6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <539c60b90801221456t6b54d61fjb742b65138cdbdc6@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.4) Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: x11 missing modules on 7.0rc1 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:02:14 -0000 Quoting Steve Franks : > Maybe I missed something critical, but I just decided to give 7.0rc1 a > shot, did a standard x-user install on a fresh system (older 1.3GHz > laptop), went smoothly, but startx reports "(EE) Failed to load module > "mouse" (modules does not exist, 0)", (and kbd, and radeon) which > seems a tad strange. If it's really not an issue where I forgot to > RTFM somewhere, I thought I'd post it so it can be looked at. I'm now > in the process of reinstalling xorg from the metaport...don't see any > earlier posts on this topic, so I must be an idiot here somewhere... > > Steve > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" > Steve: What did you do to configure X? If you configured your xorg.conf what =20 selection do you have for your mouse bus (PS2, USB, sorry can't =20 remember the default since I don't run X)? Also, do you have the =20 drivers installed for your video card and which drivers are you using? Thx, David ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 23:13:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD71E16A46C for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:13:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-40.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-40.bluehost.com [69.89.20.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A522A13C4D5 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:13:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 15627 invoked by uid 0); 22 Jan 2008 23:13:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by mailproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 22 Jan 2008 23:13:31 -0000 Received: from c-24-9-123-251.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.9.123.251] helo=demeter.hydra) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JHSJ9-00041d-10 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:13:31 -0700 Received: by demeter.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:13:30 -0700 Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:13:30 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080122231330.GE78931@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080122125651.V2077@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <4795F048.3090501@pacific.net.sg> <20080122145708.S2543@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080122145708.S2543@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.com} {sentby:smtp auth 24.9.123.251 authed with perrin@apotheon.com} Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:13:32 -0000 On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 03:00:45PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >>jest first step to criminalize unix at all > > > >first step? > > > >Many Unix tools are considered illegal by German law since last summer. > > > > could you mail me more about it ? > > it's as stupid as considering knives to be illegal. yes i can kill with > knife, but i don't do this, and need it to slice a bread. > and there are 1000 other ways to kill - without knife You probably think that's an absurd notion that nobody would ever enact, and mean to show how absurd it is to outlaw `host -l` by drawing an analogy with outlawing knives. Such an argument is dependent upon the assumption that the guy listening to you thinks it's absurd to outlaw knives. Before making that assumption, however, you should have a look at laws regarding knives in Scotland. There's no end to the absurdity of law. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Anonymous: "Eat your crow early, while it's young and tender. Don't wait until it's old and tough." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 23:33:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C37216A41A for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:33:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BE413C4DD for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:33:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 68so1102172wra.13 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:33:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=/T/X/ltfo1e6LPVEyAeKKxyVGGrHBc1wBKd4NmVECDY=; b=tvXkO1v9DJr4Z0qJhi8+3t8qinTjCS/Zq9wMwAgA1HGXIMELhUC7E/OocYbesn3J65IeExaAQpwNz0VlIjv1BUHqTarce50xT0x1Zb2iy7s3Hli1alcDOhAvxpoUMCXGihvGrCeFxaSoWwD2dyerxJUPBYmohfEVvn1B61ex6Z4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=iMzWy1gNv6gfrNmzQziPemhmfv9UFgNa6kX/PywwmruZokVvMLmnqcDKHONHAJaNye157tlMrrA03klH0x6Q0aIUvFFRwDKJ2xK1jyFSxrfI1cR5eLUrE+K7Vwibu+0E+CxfkjeG1z0qXmgcub+rGZLd9WfyifkkWp+sP3WXk9Q= Received: by 10.142.194.1 with SMTP id r1mr4553872wff.123.1201044804580; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:33:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.194.10 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:33:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <539c60b90801221533h42903848uce90320c96b35bbd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:33:24 -0700 From: "Steve Franks" Sender: bahamasfranks@gmail.com To: "David Alanis" In-Reply-To: <20080122170213.astw529woo8w00gg@mail.dalan.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <539c60b90801221456t6b54d61fjb742b65138cdbdc6@mail.gmail.com> <20080122170213.astw529woo8w00gg@mail.dalan.us> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7cf7f8564d242d0f Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: x11 missing modules on 7.0rc1 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stevefranks@ieee.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:33:26 -0000 On Jan 22, 2008 4:02 PM, David Alanis wrote: > > Quoting Steve Franks : > > > Maybe I missed something critical, but I just decided to give 7.0rc1 a > > shot, did a standard x-user install on a fresh system (older 1.3GHz > > laptop), went smoothly, but startx reports "(EE) Failed to load module > > "mouse" (modules does not exist, 0)", (and kbd, and radeon) which > > seems a tad strange. If it's really not an issue where I forgot to > > RTFM somewhere, I thought I'd post it so it can be looked at. I'm now > > in the process of reinstalling xorg from the metaport...don't see any > > earlier posts on this topic, so I must be an idiot here somewhere... > > > > Steve > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > Steve: > > What did you do to configure X? If you configured your xorg.conf what > selection do you have for your mouse bus (PS2, USB, sorry can't > remember the default since I don't run X)? Also, do you have the > drivers installed for your video card and which drivers are you using? > > Thx, > David > Further investigation shows that xorg-drivers-7.3 is missing. I'm not sure how that happened since choosing "X-User" on the 7.0rc1 install cd, but I'll be rectifying it shortly as soon as I extract the latest portsnap. Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 22 23:36:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 044A416A417 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:36:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from iota.fastbighost.com (iota.fastbighost.com [65.98.8.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF5FC13C457 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:36:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from [89.123.34.240] (port=56291 helo=deimos.bsd.nix) by iota.fastbighost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JHSfT-0007ks-Eu; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:36:36 +0000 Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:35:40 +0200 From: Ghirai To: David Alanis Message-Id: <20080123013540.d14cdf2a.ghirai@ghirai.com> In-Reply-To: <20080122170213.astw529woo8w00gg@mail.dalan.us> References: <539c60b90801221456t6b54d61fjb742b65138cdbdc6@mail.gmail.com> <20080122170213.astw529woo8w00gg@mail.dalan.us> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: ghirai@ghirai.com X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - iota.fastbighost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ghirai.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: x11 missing modules on 7.0rc1 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:36:47 -0000 On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:02:13 -0600 David Alanis wrote: > Quoting Steve Franks : > > > Maybe I missed something critical, but I just decided to give 7.0rc1 a > > shot, did a standard x-user install on a fresh system (older 1.3GHz > > laptop), went smoothly, but startx reports "(EE) Failed to load module > > "mouse" (modules does not exist, 0)", (and kbd, and radeon) which > > seems a tad strange. If it's really not an issue where I forgot to > > RTFM somewhere, I thought I'd post it so it can be looked at. I'm now > > in the process of reinstalling xorg from the metaport...don't see any > > earlier posts on this topic, so I must be an idiot here somewhere... > > > > Steve Happened to me too, i was installing it for a friend (worked fine when i installed it for myself a couple days earlier). You need to manually install /usr/ports/x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse. It should work fine then. -- Regards, Ghirai. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 00:13:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B480E16A417 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (b4.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7081513C455 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0N0E3Nw008860; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:14:04 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:13:17 -0500 (EST) From: Chris Hill To: David Alanis In-Reply-To: <20080122164813.mdeiowakg0cco0os@mail.dalan.us> Message-ID: <20080122190836.Q17945@tripel.monochrome.org> References: <20080122223318.GB25065@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> <20080122164813.mdeiowakg0cco0os@mail.dalan.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Oliver Peter , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB / umass / automount X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:13:32 -0000 On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, David Alanis wrote: > Quoting Oliver Peter : > >> Hi, >> >> What is currently the best way to attach and detach umass-devices >> automatically? >> >> Bye >> Oliver >> >> -- >> Oliver PETER, email: hoschi@mouhaha.de, ICQ# 113969174 >> "Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away. >> The Queen is their slave." >> > > Could you just edit your fstab to have: > > /dev/umass-device /umass /umass-type auto 0 0 ^^^^ This will not make the auto-mounter daemon happen; rather, it will cause the system to try to mount /dev/umass-device at boot time. If the umass device is not connected at boot time, the system will need manual intervention in order to boot. Probably not what the OP wants. Besides, auto is the default anyway. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 01:22:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D86916A469 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:22:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) Received: from pollux.dfwlp.com (rrcs-64-183-212-244.sw.biz.rr.com [64.183.212.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F23D13C455 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:22:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) Received: from athena.dfwlp.com (athena.dfwlp.com [192.168.125.82]) (authenticated bits=0) by pollux.dfwlp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0N1MoVM045044 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:22:51 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from freebsd08@dfwlp.com) From: Jonathan Horne To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:22:50 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080122223318.GB25065@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> <20080122164813.mdeiowakg0cco0os@mail.dalan.us> <20080122190836.Q17945@tripel.monochrome.org> In-Reply-To: <20080122190836.Q17945@tripel.monochrome.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801221922.50495.freebsd08@dfwlp.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=3.6 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on pollux.dfwlp.com Subject: Re: USB / umass / automount X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:22:54 -0000 On Tuesday 22 January 2008 06:13:17 pm Chris Hill wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, David Alanis wrote: > > Quoting Oliver Peter : > >> Hi, > >> > >> What is currently the best way to attach and detach umass-devices > >> automatically? > >> > >> Bye > >> Oliver > >> > >> -- > >> Oliver PETER, email: hoschi@mouhaha.de, ICQ# 113969174 > >> "Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away. > >> The Queen is their slave." > > > > Could you just edit your fstab to have: > > > > /dev/umass-device /umass /umass-type auto 0 0 > > ^^^^ > This will not make the auto-mounter daemon happen; rather, it will cause > the system to try to mount /dev/umass-device at boot time. If the umass > device is not connected at boot time, the system will need manual > intervention in order to boot. Probably not what the OP wants. Besides, > auto is the default anyway. > > -- > Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org > ** [ Busy Expunging <|> ] sysutils/desktopbsd-tools. not automatic, but at least there is a little tray icon you can click on to control the mounting/unmounting. works well for me. cheers, -- Jonathan Horne http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org freebsd08 _@_ dfwlp.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 01:25:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C67D416A41B for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-out.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426D613C448 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-av-04.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-02.forthnet.gr (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m0N1PBgr007789; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:25:11 +0200 Received: from MX-IN-03.forthnet.gr (mx-in-05.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.32]) by mx-av-04.forthnet.gr (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0N1PB6n005134; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:25:11 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (ppp133-151.adsl.forthnet.gr [62.1.124.151]) by MX-IN-03.forthnet.gr (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0N1PA9A013396; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:25:11 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-03.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-03.forthnet.gr header.from=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; sender-id=neutral Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0N1P9Hc004109; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:25:09 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m0N1P85r004108; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:25:08 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:25:08 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Schiz0 Message-ID: <20080123012508.GA4036@kobe.laptop> References: <8d23ec860801221328s601bade5qab86280cd0441ffb@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8d23ec860801221328s601bade5qab86280cd0441ffb@mail.gmail.com> Cc: Agus , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sendmail local only..... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:25:13 -0000 On 2008-01-22 16:28, Schiz0 wrote: >On Jan 22, 2008 4:25 PM, Agus wrote: >> Hi guys, >> Just trying to make sendmail work locally only.....And by that i >> mean, i dont want sendmail to be able to relay or send mail to any >> other machine except for localhost.... >> >> How can i do this? I mean is there a way on rc.conf or i need to >> touch the cf?? > > Search the file /etc/defaults/rc.conf for "sendmail" > It has a bunch of options and explains what they do. > NOTE: do not edit /etc/defaults/rc.conf - that's just the "Default > settings" file. > Make any changes in the /etc/rc.conf file instead. > > Basically, you want > > sendmail_enable="NO" > > And the rest of the sendmail options enabled. Not all of them, mind you. I use the following on my laptop: sendmail_enable="NO" sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" sendmail_submit_enable="YES" sendmail_msp_queue_enable="YES" A fairly good explanation of why this setup works only as a 'local MTA', and doesn't accept incoming SMTP connections from the world can be found in the manpage of rc.sendmail: % man rc.sendmail To the original poster: Feel free to use the above sendmail_xxx settings in your `/etc/rc.conf' file, but please make sure that you also: ... understand why these settings make Sendmail only forward locally generated email messages, by reading the rc.sendmail manpage. ... have configured properly your local `/etc/mail/sendmail.cf' and `/etc/mail/submit.cf' files. ... read the Handbook section about Sendmail, and let us know if you find it difficult to understand, or you would like to see more stuff documented. Cheers, Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 01:41:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CF716A417 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:41:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A996013C461 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:41:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so681631anc.13 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:41:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=ongn4iTl2SFeoHK/u/zOiY33Q8j5wGWvlHcjjWbEFDM=; b=fzT+qBj0vmxCOets2oDbmVspAZX0qf1MJ+DzI93DpLI9Qkfc+TxUme3/5wEys6piIH7K/KP1u9ybuE4A2/Fez3qQY7AWPpk1kXrSfismjQ+4bGvfCUYFfNKCdf873DSPnlNCiS56d9U+kzBpPb9+R5lZJLA8+r2oc/kbdmQB+t4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Ow8Fr51aU7H0XX3Cz0kPVrHUV399O8b6BwAMLLTN1z1mVku0QpxTwT4f6MNAkkOoV035gsVV98kAIrt4VKJ08dbsVG/oMJKT3AGvC57LeGtCVI1TeUcwFJwcYDq90DeMDLRzCkli68li7HIiMCyLy/DDi19nBjAhgEgFtmiB/wE= Received: by 10.100.196.17 with SMTP id t17mr18971974anf.115.1201052505091; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:41:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.109.18 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:41:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:41:44 -0300 From: Agus To: "Giorgos Keramidas" In-Reply-To: <20080123012508.GA4036@kobe.laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <8d23ec860801221328s601bade5qab86280cd0441ffb@mail.gmail.com> <20080123012508.GA4036@kobe.laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Schiz0 , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sendmail local only..... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:41:46 -0000 2008/1/22, Giorgos Keramidas : > > On 2008-01-22 16:28, Schiz0 wrote: > >On Jan 22, 2008 4:25 PM, Agus wrote: > >> Hi guys, > >> Just trying to make sendmail work locally only.....And by that i > >> mean, i dont want sendmail to be able to relay or send mail to any > >> other machine except for localhost.... > >> > >> How can i do this? I mean is there a way on rc.conf or i need to > >> touch the cf?? > > > > Search the file /etc/defaults/rc.conf for "sendmail" > > It has a bunch of options and explains what they do. > > NOTE: do not edit /etc/defaults/rc.conf - that's just the "Default > > settings" file. > > Make any changes in the /etc/rc.conf file instead. > > > > Basically, you want > > > > sendmail_enable="NO" > > > > And the rest of the sendmail options enabled. > > Not all of them, mind you. I use the following on my laptop: > > sendmail_enable="NO" > sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" > sendmail_submit_enable="YES" > sendmail_msp_queue_enable="YES" > > A fairly good explanation of why this setup works only as a 'local MTA', > and doesn't accept incoming SMTP connections from the world can be found > in the manpage of rc.sendmail: > > % man rc.sendmail > > To the original poster: > > Feel free to use the above sendmail_xxx settings in your `/etc/rc.conf' > file, but please make sure that you also: > > ... understand why these settings make Sendmail only forward locally > generated email messages, by reading the rc.sendmail manpage. > > ... have configured properly your local `/etc/mail/sendmail.cf' and > `/etc/mail/submit.cf' files. > > ... read the Handbook section about Sendmail, and let us know if you > find it difficult to understand, or you would like to see more stuff > documented. > > Cheers, > Giorgos > > Well thank you very much Giorgos and all....will use this but first will read all the mans you suggested me..... Very much appreciated... Cheers, Agustin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 01:47:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E94416A417 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:47:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougs@dawnsign.com) Received: from mailfilter.dawnsign.com (cetus.dawnsign.com [216.70.250.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3665E13C459 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:47:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougs@dawnsign.com) Received: from cetus.dawnsign.com (cetus.dawnsign.com [192.168.1.5]) by mailfilter.dawnsign.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0F569582C for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:47:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by cetus.dawnsign.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:47:24 -0800 Message-ID: <9DE6EC5B5CF8C84281AE3D7454376A0D6D0210@cetus.dawnsign.com> From: Doug Sampson To: "'questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:47:17 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cc: Subject: RE: 3Ware 9650SE with 4 disk array X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:47:30 -0000 > Hi, > > We've received a server containing 3Ware 9650SE controller > with 4 ports and > it comes with 4 WD7500AYYS drives with the following drive > parameters of LBA > 1465149168 (sectors?). I'm using FBSD 7.0 RC-1 which provides > the necessary > drivers for that controller card. The array is created using RAID5. > > The problem arises when I fdisk the drive array. The > sysinstall installation > routine complains that the drive parameters provided by the BIOS is > incorrect. When I ask to see the drive info using fdisk, I am > given the > following information: > > # fdisk > parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: > cylinders=273542 heads=255 sectors/tracks=63 (16065 blks/cyl) > > Media sector size is 512 > Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 > Information from BIOS bootblock is: > The data for partition 1 is: > sysid 165 (0xa5),(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) > start 63, size 88484871 (48576 Meg), flag 80 (active) > beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; > end: cyl 1023/ head 165/ sector 59 > The data for partition 2 is: > > The data for partition 3 is: > > The data for partition 4 is: > > # > > I see that when I am finished setting up the drive array, I > am getting a > much smaller use of the entire array. Using the "Auto Defaults" option > inside bsdlabel, I end up with /dev/da0s1f (/usr) in the > range of 40 GB. I > should be seeing something in the order of 2 TB. > > I've tried fdisking and bsdlabeling for 2 Tb to no avail > several times. > > What am I doing wrong? > Turns out the disk array had a partition set up for 2048 GB which FBSD 7.0 RC-1 doesn't support. Auto-carving the array to 2047 GB did the trick. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 01:52:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF64016A418 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:52:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from breazeal@hemc.net) Received: from mail.hemc.net (mail.hemc.net [63.69.63.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC26D13C43E for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:52:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from breazeal@hemc.net) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (unverified [66.128.141.48]) by mail.hemc.net (Vircom SMTPRS 4.4.568.0) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:44:26 -0500 X-Modus-BlackList: 66.128.141.48=OK;breazeal@hemc.net=OK X-Modus-Trusted: 66.128.141.48=YES X-Modus-Audit: FALSE;0;0;0 Message-ID: <47965504.2080208@hemc.net> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:41:40 +0000 From: Jerry Breazeale User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071223) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Xorg config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:52:45 -0000 Newbie question here. I've followed the installation instructions in the book FreeBSD 6 Unleashed and (finally) gotten it installed. Now I proceed to the setting up of X, where the book says to log in as root, and type Xorg -configure . I do that and get a response something like Xorg command not known. During the installation, I selected Install it all including X. This is version 6.3 by the way. And this is about the 3rd or 4th attempt at installation on this HDD. Some help would be appreciated. By the way, after each of the first couple attempts at installation,during which I'd set up a separate /boot partition, I couldn't get FreeBSD to boot from the HDD. The book had no caution about not using a separate /boot partition, but that's what I found to be causing the problem. I installed again but without a separate /boot partition, and can now boot from the HDD. Jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 03:28:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF2316A46C for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:28:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1987@borozo.com) Received: from smtp.3dresearch.com (dorabella.3dresearch.com [66.167.251.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE8313C442 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:28:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1987@borozo.com) Received: from fracasso.3dresearch.com (c-71-61-128-39.hsd1.pa.comcast.net [71.61.128.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by vmail.3dresearch.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97B4BB42C3; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:28:57 -0500 (EST) Received: from fracasso.3dresearch.com (fracasso.3dresearch.com [10.61.70.2]) by fracasso.3dresearch.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C34B1703C; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:28:56 -0500 (EST) From: Joe Demeny To: Paul Procacci Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 22:28:52 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200801211349.11860.jd1987@borozo.com> <20080121194921.GA48528@procacci.kicks-ass.org> In-Reply-To: <20080121194921.GA48528@procacci.kicks-ass.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801222228.53692.jd1987@borozo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make installworld failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 03:28:59 -0000 On Monday 21 January 2008 02:49:22 pm Paul Procacci wrote: > Do you have any partitions mounted with noexec? > > I just got a very similar problem and it was due to me having /tmp mounted > with noexec. > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 01:49:11PM -0500, Joe Demeny wrote: > > After building world and kernel, installed kernel, but got an error when > > I tried make installworld: > > > > # [...] Indeed, that was the problem, thank you... should have thought of this! -- Joe Demeny From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 04:20:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D953616A417 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:20:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912A713C474 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:20:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bahamasfranks@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l8so1576124nzf.13 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:20:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; bh=GnXqKvqYifcwgDNsd1Q9gTbdndhLOAD9eucp5LTkclY=; b=SBeiX8myngKhsy94xZ+NMLWxDqMRq/0x5/d3YXlrVldOB5HmLNaOs31z3zsOgpFjg4ZiF37o0FFcA6yyaWNy02A29lSqFjgkM4Z/nWsMbwFXV2ZlKMb2dcIlIR0mmBice4FgxbgWOL7fU/jOmoCCtRFyjV3hg0feqlvd6I9bKkI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=LkCZ2vjmY+0GDzMYdtUpEitf30zTWUJlBbJS2mhIBgTo35OBplKP+i4oSomJfiKdjfjhgD3DSHtxH3Gca5A5wJlEQ9TGGo5LU2ZrJPT4tuzyv9gHaVPZVrtRfv/zW6qkSIA3OKski+06IhrXgbrZhiII6XMi+TTvRpz9oMaaOmg= Received: by 10.142.240.9 with SMTP id n9mr4611050wfh.79.1201062033148; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:20:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.194.10 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:20:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <539c60b90801222020je26085aya2a52553b7e33972@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:20:33 -0700 From: "Steve Franks" Sender: bahamasfranks@gmail.com To: "User Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: 7bc1151baf488434 Subject: dri on radeon mobility 7500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: stevefranks@ieee.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:20:34 -0000 I get the infamous "Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display ":0.0" error on my new system (7.0rc1). I've put dri & glx in xorg.conf (7.3), to no avail. Relevant dmesg: ... drm0: on vgapci0 info: [drm] AGP at 0xe4000000 64MB info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.25.0 20060524 ... info: [drm] Setting GART location based on new memory map info: [drm] writeback test succeeded in 1 usecs drm0: [ITHREAD] error: [drm:pid1180:drm_close] *ERROR* can't find authenticator .... Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 04:37:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C590216A419 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:37:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from breazeal@hemc.net) Received: from mail.hemc.net (mail.hemc.net [63.69.63.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6220313C4D1 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:37:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from breazeal@hemc.net) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (unverified [66.128.141.48]) by mail.hemc.net (Vircom SMTPRS 4.4.568.0) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:29:06 -0500 X-Modus-BlackList: 66.128.141.48=OK;breazeal@hemc.net=OK X-Modus-Trusted: 66.128.141.48=YES X-Modus-Audit: FALSE;0;0;0 Message-ID: <4796C1EC.9050602@hemc.net> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:26:20 -0500 From: Jerry Breazeale User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000608000501030000000504" Subject: setup question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:37:24 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000608000501030000000504 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'll try again to submit a question. Please see the attached. Jerry Attachment is a copy of the message. --------------000608000501030000000504 Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="orig.eml" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="orig.eml" Received: (EYOU MX PROGRAM); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:53:34 +0800 Message-ID: <401053214.28404@eyou.com> Return-Path: kugua065315@eyou.com Received: (EYOU MX PROGRAM); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:53:34 +0800 Message-ID: <401053214.27757@eyou.com> Received: from unknown (HELO eyou.net) (172.16.16.2) by 0.0.0.0 with SMTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:53:34 +0800 X-EYOU-SPAMVALUE: 10 X-EYOU-DEALDRC: Received: (eyou anti_spam gateway 3.0); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:53:34 +0800 Message-ID: <401053213.26440@eyou.net> Received: from 69.147.83.53 by 61.136.62.89 with SMTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:53:31 +0800 Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12682FD02; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58FBB16A4B3; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:52:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org) Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF64016A418 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:52:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from breazeal@hemc.net) Received: from mail.hemc.net (mail.hemc.net [63.69.63.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC26D13C43E for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:52:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from breazeal@hemc.net) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (unverified [66.128.141.48]) by mail.hemc.net (Vircom SMTPRS 4.4.568.0) with ESMTP id for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:44:26 -0500 X-Modus-BlackList: 66.128.141.48=OK;breazeal@hemc.net=OK X-Modus-Trusted: 66.128.141.48=YES X-Modus-Audit: FALSE;0;0;0 Message-ID: <47965504.2080208@hemc.net> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:41:40 +0000 From: Jerry Breazeale User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071223) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Xorg config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Errors-To: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Newbie question here. I've followed the installation instructions in the book FreeBSD 6 Unleashed and (finally) gotten it installed. Now I proceed to the setting up of X, where the book says to log in as root, and type Xorg -configure . I do that and get a response something like Xorg command not known. During the installation, I selected Install it all including X. This is version 6.3 by the way. And this is about the 3rd or 4th attempt at installation on this HDD. Some help would be appreciated. By the way, after each of the first couple attempts at installation,during which I'd set up a separate /boot partition, I couldn't get FreeBSD to boot from the HDD. The book had no caution about not using a separate /boot partition, but that's what I found to be causing the problem. I installed again but without a separate /boot partition, and can now boot from the HDD. Jerry _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --------------000608000501030000000504-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 04:41:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EB316A418 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:41:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from navneet.upadhyay@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8F113C461 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:41:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from navneet.upadhyay@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1616944wxd.7 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:41:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=DCjEKBFN9vo50Fhz4DgFauN3JA0i3TkLtDUUklIr1i8=; b=sKAQMwfVK+WhT2k2/2L+usFmT+TZEp/JGTh7ZO7nepJLaAW1oZ7ilMKki5Z1R/qlBDXck9sEdW5sA7WUOVGqf6stGmB6PryLET0FjJTus/n9NbLz9iBt1p9jEHgx/87yVbRYU6gtDhIjer71jHwOb+GzNUAmCJVNYRydSPgDajY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=akg9C3SFrn3lxwRszoA/JgiN+uNJNB3jSekgts7CubwocMAIJVgG9BZut5KhACZB5TlvZ4SCpR59WygMBJwRgmWEAz4oxoNJFoyfIjmkkXto1wmvzsJIEktiAKGRv5bM0uJyG2F6qFAipN9Nf6Sc2iznAB3Nnwn+Ex6aC4azCxg= Received: by 10.150.92.11 with SMTP id p11mr3299544ybb.105.1201063264480; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:41:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.148.8 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:41:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1563a4fd0801222041r63c147e1he6e9853a50efd3b0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:11:04 +0530 From: "navneet Upadhyay" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Latest Stable FreeBSD version and its Dell 2950 Compatiblity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:41:05 -0000 Hi, I need to know which is the latest stable FreeBSD release(6.2 ?) and does it goes well with Dell 2950 ? Thanks Navneet From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 04:42:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DEE416A469 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:42:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C7C13C4CC for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:42:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1617045wxd.7 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:42:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.14.20 with SMTP id 20mr5953776wxn.25.1201063339329; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:42:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.100.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i37sm35480718wxd.12.2008.01.22.20.42.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:42:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from obelix (obelix [192.168.17.13]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F312511427; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:42:12 +0400 (GST) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:42:12 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@obelix.home.rakhesh.com To: Zbigniew Szalbot In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801220945j164eaf9clffeeda7186242cd1@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080123084020.L38771@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> References: <94136a2c0801220259x1b7dd4efw7a8fc1e8a60d2cc9@mail.gmail.com> <20080122202158.R45709@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> <94136a2c0801220845w6bbf50c9q7ba59052c72e871d@mail.gmail.com> <20080122211202.Q45709@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> <94136a2c0801220945j164eaf9clffeeda7186242cd1@mail.gmail.com> X-Blog: http://rakhesh.com/ X-Notes: http://rakhesh.net/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pflogd log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:42:20 -0000 >>>>> I noticed that pflog is not being written to. >>>>> >>>>> $ l /var/log/pflog >>>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 60 Jan 22 00:00 /var/log/pflog >>>>> >>>>> However, the process running pflogd runs as _pflogd. Does this mean I >>>>> should chown the log file with user _pflogd? >>>> >> Also, just noticed now that my /var/log/pflog file doesn't have read perms >> for the others group. Would suggest removing that and trying again. >> Possible the extra perms are an issue. > > I do not know. > > l /var/log/pflog > -rw------- 1 root wheel 60 Jan 22 00:00 /var/log/pflog Ok. In your original mail, the permissions were different ... > $ ps ax |grep pflog > 25478 ?? Is 0:00.01 pflogd: [priv] (pflogd) > 25479 ?? S 0:00.03 pflogd: [suspended] -s 116 -f /var/log/pflog (pflogd) > 25561 p0 S+ 0:00.01 grep pflog > > Not really sure what is going on. I tried: > kill -HUP 25479 I would suggest asking this question on the freebsd-pf mailing list then. They can help better I guess. Thanks, Rakhesh --- http://rakhesh.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 04:44:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B7616A421 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:44:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: from smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg (smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 350D613C448 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:44:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 17524 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2008 04:44:11 -0000 Received: from adsl181.dyn229.pacific.net.sg (HELO P2120.somewherefaraway.com) (oceanare@210.24.229.181) by smtpgate2.pacific.net.sg with ESMTPA; 23 Jan 2008 04:44:09 -0000 Message-ID: <4796C60F.9030304@pacific.net.sg> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:43:59 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070826) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jerry Breazeale References: <4796C1EC.9050602@hemc.net> In-Reply-To: <4796C1EC.9050602@hemc.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setup question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:44:15 -0000 Hi, can you check with the downloadable handbook what the currently recommended procedure to setup X is. Books tend to be outdated. If I remember right then the current version of X starts just fine without any configuration file. We also would need the program versions to help you a bit more specific. Erich Jerry Breazeale wrote: > I'll try again to submit a question. Please see the attached. > Jerry > > > > Attachment is a copy of the message. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > Xorg config > From: > Jerry Breazeale > Date: > Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:41:40 +0000 > To: > questions@FreeBSD.org > > To: > questions@FreeBSD.org > CC: > > > Newbie question here. > I've followed the installation instructions in the book FreeBSD 6 > Unleashed and (finally) gotten it installed. Now I proceed to the > setting up of X, where the book says to log in as root, and type Xorg > -configure . I do that and get a response something like Xorg command > not known. During the installation, I selected Install it all including > X. This is version 6.3 by the way. And this is about the 3rd or 4th > attempt at installation on this HDD. Some help would be appreciated. > > By the way, after each of the first couple attempts at > installation,during which I'd set up a separate /boot partition, I > couldn't get FreeBSD to boot from the HDD. The book had no caution > about not using a separate /boot partition, but that's what I found to > be causing the problem. I installed again but without a separate /boot > partition, and can now boot from the HDD. > > Jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 04:59:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDE216A474 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E25013C4E7 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from [172.16.156.151] (pool-71-182-130-170.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net [71.182.130.170]) (AUTH: LOGIN seklecki, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:59:50 -0500 id 00056405.4796C9C6.000130E5 From: "Brian A. Seklecki" To: navneet Upadhyay In-Reply-To: <1563a4fd0801222041r63c147e1he6e9853a50efd3b0@mail.gmail.com> References: <1563a4fd0801222041r63c147e1he6e9853a50efd3b0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:59:46 -0500 Message-Id: <1201064386.3173.4.camel@new-host> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.2 (2.12.2-3.fc8) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Latest Stable FreeBSD version and its Dell 2950 Compatiblity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 04:59:52 -0000 On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 10:11 +0530, navneet Upadhyay wrote: > Hi, > I need to know which is the latest stable FreeBSD release(6.2 ?) and > does it goes well with Dell 2950 ? Did you check the list archives? With 6.2: - Make sure you get revision 2 of the unit - bce(4) onboard is not recommended, easily reproduced crashes with high load a la Broadcom -- get add-on em(4) cards - DRAC5 works fine, except it runs Linux and requires ActiveX - PERC4 works with mfi(4), just remember: - Install linux32 compat to utilize megacli + mfi(4) patches - Disable 'Patrol Reads' in the BIOS - The jury is still out on PERC5. Sounds like Dell blowing smoke. - IPMI works well. ~BAS > Thanks > Navneet > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 05:01:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CC516A419 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:01:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A533B13C467 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:01:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aquarius.dyndns.org (athedsl-284011.home.otenet.gr [85.73.157.9]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m0N51aNp017646; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:01:37 +0200 Message-ID: <4796CA30.1060102@otenet.gr> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:01:36 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jerry Breazeale References: <4796C1EC.9050602@hemc.net> In-Reply-To: <4796C1EC.9050602@hemc.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setup question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:01:40 -0000 Jerry Breazeale wrote: > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Subject: > Xorg config > From: > Jerry Breazeale > Date: > Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:41:40 +0000 > To: > questions@FreeBSD.org > > To: > questions@FreeBSD.org > CC: > > > Newbie question here. > I've followed the installation instructions in the book FreeBSD 6 > Unleashed and (finally) gotten it installed. Now I proceed to the > setting up of X, where the book says to log in as root, and type Xorg > -configure . I do that and get a response something like Xorg command > not known. During the installation, I selected Install it all > including X. This is version 6.3 by the way. And this is about the > 3rd or 4th attempt at installation on this HDD. Some help would be > appreciated. > > By the way, after each of the first couple attempts at > installation,during which I'd set up a separate /boot partition, I > couldn't get FreeBSD to boot from the HDD. The book had no caution > about not using a separate /boot partition, but that's what I found to > be causing the problem. I installed again but without a separate > /boot partition, and can now boot from the HDD. > > Jerry > It seems both 6.3-RELEASE and 7.0-RC1 exhibit the same symptom. If you perform the standard install + X, it is missing several parts of xorg, most obvious one is xorg-drivers. The solution is not really to install just xorg-drivers by hand (you will just find you are missing other X-related packages afterwards) but installing the entire xorg-7.3 metapackage. This can be done during the initial installation, when asked whether you would like to "browse the package collection", answer yes, then find from the list the xorg-7.3 package (I believe it is in category x11) and install it. This will pull all other required dependencies. It seems the standard installation + X only installs the xorg-server package (x11-server) which is simply not enough, since xorg is now modular. Manolis From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 05:05:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A903A16A420 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:05:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1184913C459 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:05:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0N55frd058144 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:05:41 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.6/8.12.11) id m0N55fUe085905; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:05:41 +0700 (ICT) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:05:41 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200801230505.m0N55fUe085905@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: navneet.upadhyay@gmail.com In-reply-to: <1563a4fd0801222041r63c147e1he6e9853a50efd3b0@mail.gmail.com> (navneet.upadhyay@gmail.com) References: <1563a4fd0801222041r63c147e1he6e9853a50efd3b0@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Latest Stable FreeBSD version and its Dell 2950 Compatiblity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:05:43 -0000 > I need to know which is the latest stable FreeBSD release(6.2 ?) and > does it goes well with Dell 2950 ? 6.3 should be the latest stable. And yes about the 2950, with the bellow remarks (I asked the same question one month ago, check fro the tread about "dell Power Edge 2950"). Olivier > Make sure that you get a Revision 2 (R2). We had some serious stability > issues with two R1s. Yay for beta testing $6k servers. > > You'll want to read the entire thread about mfi(4) and bce(4) instability > on RELENG_6. Someone just reported a geometry size reporting error with > the new PERC/6 that Dell is pushing, so stick with PERC/5. > > My personal recommendation is to use em(4) and disable onboard Broadcom > and forget that Dell ever started shipping Broadcom. > > ~BAS > > As stupid as this is going to sound, I solved my dump problem on one of > > my 2950s running amd64 7.0 with two dual core processors. > > > > The problem was when I did a level 0 dump, regardless of partition. At > > random times the dump would halt, never to resume. Restarting the dump > > was a hit-and-miss as to whether it would succeed. Eventually the dump > > would succeed but it might tape 20 attempts to dump /var, for example. > > > > The problem was solved this stupid way: > > > > Have some other disk activity on the dumping partition. For example, if > > I am dumping /var I repeatedly execute this command: ls -lR /var > > > /dev/null > > > Did you disable the "randomly schedule a RAID parity check of random > sectors" feature in the PERC5 BIOS? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 05:09:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31B516A420 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:09:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ECA413C447 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:09:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from [172.16.156.151] (pool-71-182-130-170.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net [71.182.130.170]) (AUTH: LOGIN seklecki, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:09:48 -0500 id 00056415.4796CC1C.00013242 From: "Brian A. Seklecki" To: Olivier Nicole In-Reply-To: <200801230505.m0N55fUe085905@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> References: <1563a4fd0801222041r63c147e1he6e9853a50efd3b0@mail.gmail.com> <200801230505.m0N55fUe085905@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:09:44 -0500 Message-Id: <1201064984.3173.5.camel@new-host> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.2 (2.12.2-3.fc8) Cc: navneet.upadhyay@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Latest Stable FreeBSD version and its Dell 2950 Compatiblity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:09:50 -0000 > And yes about the 2950, with the bellow remarks (I asked the same > question one month ago, check fro the tread about "dell Power Edge > 2950"). Time for a FreeBSD-PowerEdge Wiki. ~BAS > Olivier > > > Make sure that you get a Revision 2 (R2). We had some serious stability From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 05:47:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4110A16A417 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:47:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter.baele@telenet.be) Received: from hoefnix.telenet-ops.be (hoefnix.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF41113C4E7 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:47:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pieter.baele@telenet.be) Received: from monty.telenet-ops.be (monty.telenet-ops.be [195.130.132.56]) by hoefnix.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E8E9C6F6 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:32:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by monty.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with SMTP id E5BCF54013; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:32:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.200] (d54C5D844.access.telenet.be [84.197.216.68]) by monty.telenet-ops.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72035400C; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:32:50 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: From: Pieter Baele To: Jerry Breazeale In-Reply-To: <47965504.2080208@hemc.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:32:50 +0100 References: <47965504.2080208@hemc.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Xorg config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:47:04 -0000 On 22 Jan 2008, at 21:41, Jerry Breazeale wrote: > Newbie question here. > I've followed the installation instructions in the book FreeBSD 6 > Unleashed and (finally) gotten it installed. Now I proceed to the > setting up of X, where the book says to log in as root, and type > Xorg -configure . I do that and get a response something like Xorg > command not known. During the installation, I selected Install it > all including X. This is version 6.3 by the way. And this is about > the 3rd or 4th attempt at installation on this HDD. Some help would > be appreciated. Just follow the steps in the online freebsd handbook. First try startx, if that doesn't work, X is really not installed. > > By the way, after each of the first couple attempts at > installation,during which I'd set up a separate /boot partition, I > couldn't get FreeBSD to boot from the HDD. The book had no caution > about not using a separate /boot partition, but that's what I found > to be causing the problem. I installed again but without a > separate /boot partition, and can now boot from the HDD. > > Jerry You decide which partition scheme to use. /boot is used on Linux. The default layout the freebsd installer proposes (A auto) is a very good one, especially when new to FBSD. Pieter Baele pieter.baele@telenet.be VIM has two modes. The one in which it beeps and the one in which it doesn't. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 05:50:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5644716A417 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:50:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atxnomad@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FBF13C447 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:50:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atxnomad@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id y2so68449uge.37 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:50:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=A0WR7VXRWfEmjAa2576yp/chJYi42GfBqyPdPKhVkDo=; b=duiSmhs9HEj155tTc9uzyHG51XPnFKR8+FxpXlCKfbfkaiI1XEJQk4CQoT9nZFovGgtLY10yZwUwF05Wl3L8aOPU8r4Jld9qTrNx/vLOaL1BrcIoU0HtHQ4aAkA5MXuayIDXhX1EGYCBL4kW54T/Hcm/00D97Gyuw9PZr2uJw5s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=rBPyLxBIL1MdWmjcP2dw03DIeEE1Kcb2sikq+LKjXnwE4aqitpnnuia+Tu80tMZjlSsUZ5lkghJ6gMpROpDA4QUw+cZ2BssOIZjWLVR5o4/Kx/SekUCaMPEVDi4LMB9HZwNdDvNx3c3BqMe8P+0n0oN58Oi7qzBF7NOtErYs8L0= Received: by 10.67.19.13 with SMTP id w13mr538959ugi.19.1201067407333; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:50:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.31.4 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:50:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:50:07 -0600 From: Nomad To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Server unreachable after quagga install from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:50:09 -0000 I just setup a server running FreeBSD 6.3. After the install I made some housekeeping changes, installed some ports ... so far so good, no problems. Rebooted the server and still no problems. After installing quagga (/usr/ports/net/quagga) is when I started having problems. The server got rebooted and I couldn't reach it. The default appeared to be up and the NIC showed as up but I couldn't ping it. I used ifconfig to bring the NIC down and then up and after that I could ping the machine and ssh to it. Has anybody else encountered this with quagga? I'm just using it to run ospfd and advertise some addresses I have setup on the loopback. Any information would be appreciated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 05:56:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA4316A480 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC80813C447 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id m0N5u1ID042992; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:56:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Paul Schmehl" , Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:57:22 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <7FBCA209CD1A8EEDB978FFBB@utd59514.utdallas.edu> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:56:02 -0800 (PST) Cc: Subject: RE: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 05:56:03 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Paul Schmehl > Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:25 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? > > > --On Tuesday, January 22, 2008 13:03:27 +0100 Wojciech Puchar > wrote: > > > http://www.spamsuite.com/node/351 > > > > jest first step to criminalize unix at all > > _______________________________________________ > > We aren't criminals, but *he* is. > Paul, you do realize that Sierra is a known newsgroup spammer and that the lawsuit in question was just filed against a spamfighter by a spammer? Also, that the "judgement" that is in the post is actually a prepared order, written by Plaintiff's counsel, it wasn't written by the judge. This case is sitting in the appellate courts somewhere, gathering dust. Nobody has paid anything to anybody, except to the lawyers. Sierra makes their money selling to morons what Google gives out for free. Please, unless your willing to do the research, don't waste time commenting. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 06:29:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE8716A417 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CC4E13C465 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by VAMS.dummy (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A3B711EFE for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:09:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from secure.esiee.fr (secure.esiee.fr [147.215.1.19]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C3B10761 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:09:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.11] (chs77-1-82-238-8-126.fbx.proxad.net [82.238.8.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bonnetf) by secure.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EDEE7709 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:10:02 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4796D9FC.8070802@esiee.fr> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:09:00 +0100 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: "lock screen" does not works at 6.3 + gnome2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 06:29:48 -0000 Hello I've installed 6.3 on my machine with gnome2 and the "lock screen" function does not work with the standard install of GNOME2, is there some feature to install to make this available ? Thanks a lot. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 07:28:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E24716A418 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:28:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C782213C4FD for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:28:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so2615837fgg.35 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:28:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=yDAVmWs0zkmLRtc7kMF0MSIlDpDz40XHy4M5uHycnxg=; b=BktTMPxWabnJ+0/0MWIu3HlXLD9KxOJyhzFJN93F9MQzOvJA8aINYgpLwBCdUpx51nauk79LxLJij4udLmczrAxdhVYAvrXuR3lUt6zESu3IOn0uPFhX++f3wMDzY6ASK0c30dcXQGMuKU/3QEZqTN3xcUDlBrMezN1FzapvlJk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=qOf3DpL8aDKggfhUIckruLJouRywXEI7cvKD1gIQiq5bd9saFOSI0wtnprUYiA3aQS1rKmr9EU6TERfScziSimFclu+f5MvX8wbLbZsEThUv2BX4mC0CeStlKFUeR9Sysu/tIytYbbicopnMZSpujSKY1zXKSR88ORprDcdwOpE= Received: by 10.82.181.7 with SMTP id d7mr16543423buf.4.1201071826440; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:03:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.160.20 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:03:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <560f92640801222303h59232595qb1677fe9b26f2481@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:03:46 -0800 From: "Nerius Landys" To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <47965504.2080208@hemc.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <47965504.2080208@hemc.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Xorg config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:28:04 -0000 > I've followed the installation instructions in the book FreeBSD 6 > Unleashed and (finally) gotten it installed. Now I proceed to the > setting up of X, where the book says to log in as root, and type Xorg > -configure . I do that and get a response something like Xorg command > not known. During the installation, I selected Install it all including > X. This is version 6.3 by the way. And this is about the 3rd or 4th > attempt at installation on this HDD. Some help would be appreciated. > Below is an interaction with my shell. I'll explain what I'm doing afterwards. nlandys@sylvester# which Xorg /usr/local/bin/Xorg nlandys@sylvester# pkg_info -W /usr/local/bin/Xorg /usr/local/bin/Xorg was installed by package xorg-server-1.4_3,1 nlandys@sylvester# pkg_info -do xorg-server-1.4_3,1 Information for xorg-server-1.4_3,1: Description: This package contains the X.Org X server and some associated programs. WWW: http://www.freedesktop.org/Software/xorg - Eric Anholt anholt@FreeBSD.org Origin: x11-servers/xorg-server nlandys@sylvester# What I'm doing is trying to see which package the file 'Xorg' belongs to, and I'm trying to get some information about that package. What I found out is that the file in question belongs to the package xorg-server-1.4_3,1, and that if you have the ports tree installed, the ports directory would be /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server/. So if you want to check to see if the package which provides the file 'Xorg' is installed on your system, issue the command 'pkg_info | grep xorg-server'. If you see output then the package you need is already installed. Otherwise install the package 'xorg-server' in one of two ways: either install the pre-built binary [port] by issuing the command 'pkg_add -r xorg-server' or build the port from source by going to /usr/ports/x11-servers/xorg-server/ and doing a 'make install clean'. I don't know why you didn't succeed in installing 'xorg-server' during your installation if that was indeed your intent. Instead of taking my advice above you really ought to read the Handbook section on packages and ports: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports.html You can learn a lot and the documentation if really excellent. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 07:30:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9673316A419 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:30:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@sigd.net) Received: from ms05.mailstreet2003.net (ms05.mailstreet2003.net [69.25.50.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5433413C46E for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:30:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@sigd.net) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 02:30:37 -0500 Message-ID: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2210121018@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> In-Reply-To: <20080122232910.K2862@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: mfsbsd Thread-Index: AchdkXcz3LPtD7nsTmyzWeot6c5ySgAAEBlw References: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2210120D5E@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> <20080122232910.K2862@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> From: "Chris Haulmark" To: "Wojciech Puchar" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: mfsbsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:30:02 -0000 > > Anyone used mfsbsd to do remote install of a dedicated server with > > success? > > > > Summary: > > > > A dedicated server has FreeBSD 6.x running with / as the entire > > partition of the entire disk. Hoping to find a solution to do > reinstall > > remotely. >=20 > it is already running freebsd? no need any extra tool to reinstall it. >=20 Are you implying to reinstall via sysinstall with new created slices with proper labels over ssh? Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 07:48:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4435B16A420 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:48:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10A013C465 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:48:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so2621060fgg.35 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:48:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=X40Ngrqc6BHD4lj7E15rAXBmwln54sodgbVTlql9XfU=; b=FzvZLEPT6OrTU7sxPOZ39T4NHuGfy27XX4Oa844grHByiKvz0B3kkawyqluh4SO+CqQMDVym76D0N8lc2wlG4OI+IP5/ilXburxjhI6KlmXlJSFEb/nDzsi+MqSeSTTOmaHcH19mlMxVUAlnoALsLxZJ5Ho0vHK/JsbQZ95xskw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=W0ogU6xpg9xjTeJ1ox5BPDXLL3Izd5lG3B7XRYAy+bHnF8zAlxxInu3LRpnE7z5kruXUwfLDg57DiYQpijz/2PPLLCnxa6XeK/sKNweat8BEBZDG4oCQeq0lhlf1Kg7TN1fMVWwxymUSexYD2YIrdMzyCEyXaFqp1e5dMciv/wo= Received: by 10.82.186.5 with SMTP id j5mr15776966buf.12.1201074482706; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:48:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.160.20 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:48:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <560f92640801222348u4274c6f7yd14bb86715e1bd58@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 23:48:02 -0800 From: "Nerius Landys" To: questions@freebsd.org, breazeal@hemc.net In-Reply-To: <560f92640801222303h59232595qb1677fe9b26f2481@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <47965504.2080208@hemc.net> <560f92640801222303h59232595qb1677fe9b26f2481@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Xorg config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:48:05 -0000 I don't know why you didn't succeed in installing 'xorg-server' during your > installation if that was indeed your intent. > Read the Handbook section on installing X if you want to try installing or configuring X post-install: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x11.html Actually according to the handbook the package you want to have on your system is 'xorg', which can be found in /usr/ports/x11/xorg/ in case you want to build from source. But this package probably in turn depends on 'xorg-server', so your 'Xorg' file which is part of 'xorg-server' should be installed once you install the 'xorg' package. 'pkg_add -r xorg' or 'make install clean' from /usr/ports/x11/xorg/. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 08:48:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9040916A419 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:48:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C1B13C457 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:47:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0N8lJ3F001367; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:47:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0N8lEdt001364; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:47:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:47:13 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Chris Haulmark In-Reply-To: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2210121018@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> Message-ID: <20080123094641.P1318@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2210120D5E@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> <20080122232910.K2862@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2210121018@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: mfsbsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:48:04 -0000 >>> remotely. >> >> it is already running freebsd? no need any extra tool to reinstall it. >> > > Are you implying to reinstall via sysinstall with new created slices > with > proper labels over ssh? you didn't say you want repartition. this way - not. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 09:03:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2A116A417 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:03:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netslists@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69F013C459 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:03:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netslists@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so2642394fgg.35 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:03:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=V5B7wx5HdQ/Z77jwDhumd6E6UyV1G3VM0HwqCdpHT5A=; b=X1qnaNXsCczRUkC9iZp1k1eIuZa/PlQ7R4sfeVkilWqrXR936Sy9AdLLWWgyncTKe+fH2NYwnoB81fKzHNDwjzGB+Qv9igW7VE1YZ+Jy8CubS+4+CYFjCRztm1MVr19qyYaboYt6RJwhcb/J+kwe3o96lgc5MsKLhhtXUiDiU6Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MO1qeBpQx+aIw+BFHaU+xjqXClIKv2H9I2vBlS05p6CeXjYvC8jaBvEQktPBKgC5qDALY6td3NH2tpNRtwclAQnHNiKaPios/GABFRzH9s6WZZq70+Mlo6lQoO/rS+wmvqCRWSYJBoLTOZ65NxUOUUw+YpsGE+N8W71+FxIjWcg= Received: by 10.86.89.4 with SMTP id m4mr8674273fgb.45.1201079031898; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:03:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.9.8? ( [91.135.49.10]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l12sm10913807fgb.8.2008.01.23.01.03.50 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 01:03:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <479702F4.1080709@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:03:48 +0100 From: Sten Daniel Soersdal User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jason C. Wells" References: <4795F37B.4040908@gmail.com> <47960812.8070101@highperformance.net> In-Reply-To: <47960812.8070101@highperformance.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Updating older 7.0 to newer sources, local buildworld problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:03:53 -0000 Jason C. Wells wrote: > Sten Daniel Soersdal wrote: >> I'm having troubles updating my buildworld and i've had troubles >> narrowing it down on google. >> >> My question is: >> >> Is there any way i could update the system in the state it is now? >> (Preferably without reinstalling the entire system from scratch.) >> >> PS. I've heard about freebsd-update but never got it to work (see below) > > I have never used freebsd-update so I can't comment there. I think > that's a binary update though. You are trying to build from source. > > I would use cvsup to update my source tree to 7.0-RELEASE. Since your > initial sources are before Sep 19, they are not 7.0-RELEASE. Read about > cvsup in the handbook. Look at the example files in > /usr/share/examples/cvsup. The I would run 'make clean' and 'make > buildworld' all over again. > > Except for creating a newfs and tweaking files in /etc, building the > world is pretty much installing the entire system. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cutting-edge.html > > Be careful about the cvs tag that you use. RELENG_7_0_0_RELEASE is what > you will eventually want. If that tag has not yet been set by releng@, > then you will delete your sources. I recommend '-d 20' with cvsup to > protect yourself from accidental deletions. RELENG_7 is probably what > you want until 7.0 is actually released. > Thank you, i appreciate your time. At the bottom of the (messy) mail i sent there was the error i get from building sources. I think it's the same error, no matter what version of sources i download. Could it have any relations to any compiler version upgrades done in 7.0 (not by me but by freebsd project)? -- Sten Daniel Soersdal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 09:48:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3733016A46B for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:48:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55DC13C4D9 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:48:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by VAMS.dummy (Postfix) with SMTP id D1F302198E for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:47:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from privftp.esiee.fr (privftp.esiee.fr [147.215.1.190]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4572198E for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:47:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from lisa.esiee.fr (lisa.esiee.fr [147.215.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bonnetf) by privftp.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6EB83981A for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:48:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47970D76.5050505@esiee.fr> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:48:38 +0100 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080121) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4796D9FC.8070802@esiee.fr> In-Reply-To: <4796D9FC.8070802@esiee.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: "lock screen" does not works at 6.3 + gnome2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:48:40 -0000 Frank Bonnet wrote: > Hello > > I've installed 6.3 on my machine with gnome2 and the "lock screen" > function does not work with the standard install of GNOME2, is there > some feature to install to make this available ? > > Thanks a lot. > _______________________________________________ the screen saver does not work too ( and crash !) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 10:55:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB07A16A46E for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:55:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hoschi@etain.frida.mouhaha.de) Received: from etain.frida.mouhaha.de (etain.frida.mouhaha.de [85.236.48.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6023A13C468 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:55:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hoschi@etain.frida.mouhaha.de) Received: from localhost (etain.frida.mouhaha.de [85.236.48.54]) by etain.frida.mouhaha.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBC64BB9A1; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:55:19 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mouhaha.de Received: from etain.frida.mouhaha.de ([85.236.48.54]) by localhost (etain.frida.mouhaha.de [85.236.48.54]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LrgAKE5GrtEA; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:55:18 +0100 (CET) Received: by etain.frida.mouhaha.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4D53B4BB99E; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:55:18 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:55:18 +0100 From: Oliver Peter To: Chris Hill Message-ID: <20080123105517.GA76184@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> References: <20080122223318.GB25065@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> <20080122164813.mdeiowakg0cco0os@mail.dalan.us> <20080122190836.Q17945@tripel.monochrome.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080122190836.Q17945@tripel.monochrome.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p10 i386 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, David Alanis Subject: Re: USB / umass / automount X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:55:21 -0000 --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 07:13:17PM -0500, Chris Hill wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jan 2008, David Alanis wrote: >> Quoting Oliver Peter : >>> Hi, >>> What is currently the best way to attach and detach umass-devices >>> automatically? >>> Bye >>> Oliver >>> -- >>> Oliver PETER, email: hoschi@mouhaha.de, ICQ# 113969174 >>> "Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away. >>> The Queen is their slave." >>=20 >> Could you just edit your fstab to have: >>=20 >> /dev/umass-device /umass /umass-type auto 0 0 > ^^^^ > This will not make the auto-mounter daemon happen; rather, it will cause= =20 > the system to try to mount /dev/umass-device at boot time. If the umass= =20 > device is not connected at boot time, the system will need manual=20 > intervention in order to boot. Probably not what the OP wants. Besides,= =20 > auto is the default anyway. Thanks for your answers! That's not exactly what I want - I thought about to plug e.g. an usb-stick into my machine, let it mount via amd and after I detach the device from my machine amd should umount the devices automatically. Is this possible? AFAIR bad things happen when a mounted usb-devices disappears... --=20 Oliver PETER, email: hoschi@mouhaha.de, ICQ# 113969174 "Worker bees can leave. Even drones can fly away. The Queen is their slave." --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.3 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkeXHRUACgkQ6LH/IUVtaI/ZlQCgrtpyFKQYR9iVKnxhyto7pek0 1AQAoKuJflYGnxoho2vH1dUDDFWpGbgH =eD2g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 11:24:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0888B16A41A for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:24:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CECF313C457 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:24:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0NBN0VC001735; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:23:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0NBMmjB001732; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:22:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:22:48 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Oliver Peter In-Reply-To: <20080123105517.GA76184@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> Message-ID: <20080123122205.L1731@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080122223318.GB25065@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> <20080122164813.mdeiowakg0cco0os@mail.dalan.us> <20080122190836.Q17945@tripel.monochrome.org> <20080123105517.GA76184@nemesis.frida.mouhaha.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, David Alanis Subject: Re: USB / umass / automount X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:24:18 -0000 > device from my machine amd should umount the devices automatically. > > Is this possible? > no - because there is time sequence problem. device must be FIRST unmounted, then detached From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 13:05:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7419716A421 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:05:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from diri.bris.ac.uk (diri.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.112]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A51613C4E3 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:05:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from seis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.93]) by diri.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JHf2O-0007EV-7d for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:49:06 +0000 Received: from mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.184.33]) by seis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JHf2N-0003ss-9a for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:49:03 +0000 Received: from mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0NCludB001480 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:47:56 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m0NCluPN001479 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:47:56 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:47:56 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080123124756.GA1246@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Score: -1.3 X-Spam-Level: - Subject: /dev/lpt0: Device busy, lptcontrol: ioctl: Operation not supported X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:05:49 -0000 Hello My printing stopped working quite suddenly. Until today I used FBSD-6.3-prerelease (today I updated to 6.3-stable) on compaq armada 1700 laptop to print on a parallel HP laserjet 2100 printer in text mode and for postscript via apsfilter. All was fine. Then I got another parallel printer, epson lq-550 24-pin dot matrix, and played with printing on both printers by just unplugging one and plugging the other to the laptop's parallel port. For a while all was fine. However, after several days, I cannot now print on either printer. With laserjet I get # lptest 20 20 > /dev/lpt0 /dev/lpt0: Device busy. With matrix printer I get # lptest 20 20 > /dev/lpt0 # but nothing is printed. If I use the spooling system with laserjet I get # lpq waiting for lp to become ready (offline?) Rank Owner Job Files Total Size 1st root 9 (standard input) 317 bytes # cat /var/spool/lpd/good/log PAGE: 1 1 INFO: Printing page 1... # # cat /var/spool/lpd/good/status waiting for lp to become ready (offline?) # and the printer never becomes online. With matrix printer I get # lpq lp is ready and printing Rank Owner Job Files Total Size active root 8 (standard input) 317 bytes # lpq no entries but again nothing is printed. I tried to play with lptcontrol, but I get the following: # lptcontrol -i -d /dev/lpt0.ctl lptcontrol: ioctl: Operation not supported # lptcontrol -s -d /dev/lpt0.ctl lptcontrol: ioctl: Operation not supported I updated the OS and rebuilt the kernel: FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE Wed Jan 23 10:46:54 GMT 2008 but that didn't help. In my device.hints I have the following printer related lines: hint.ppc.0.at="isa" #hint.ppc.0.irq="7" to enable the polling mode. My parallel port settings: # grep ppc /var/run/dmesg.boot ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f on isa0 ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 # There is nothing in the /var/log/lpd-errs. I did find some similar posts in various archives, but couldn't see any suggestions. My questions: 1. Could I have fried my parallel chip by changing the printers with laptop powered on? How can I check this? 2. What does "Device busy" really mean, and why I cannot change the setting with lptcontrol? 3. Any other tests I could do to pinpoint the source of the problem? many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 928 8233 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 14:07:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3E216A418 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:07:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CA013C45D for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:07:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0NE6bJs002296; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:06:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0NE6XEu002293; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:06:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:06:33 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Anton Shterenlikht In-Reply-To: <20080123124756.GA1246@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> Message-ID: <20080123150405.A2257@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080123124756.GA1246@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /dev/lpt0: Device busy, lptcontrol: ioctl: Operation not supported X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:07:43 -0000 > My printing stopped working quite suddenly. > > Until today I used FBSD-6.3-prerelease (today I updated to 6.3-stable) > on compaq armada 1700 laptop to print on a parallel HP laserjet 2100 > printer in text mode and for postscript via apsfilter. All was fine. i use my laptop to print on my laserjet, and it works by default settings, but /usr/sbin/lptcontrol -d /dev/lpt0.ctl -e make it much faster. but nothing like you say. check under DOS, but it may be cable problem. > ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f on isa0 > ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > ppbus0: on ppc0 what i have (i don't disable interrupt) ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77f irq 7 drq 1 on acpi0 ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold check BIOS settings too. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 15:07:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4CE16A421 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:07:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FBE913C47E for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:07:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.5) with SMTP id CAA04694; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:07:41 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:07:40 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Daniel Gerzo In-Reply-To: <20080122021018.3F6A816A418@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ipfw(8) doc bug? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:07:46 -0000 On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:07:19 +0100 Daniel Gerzo wrote: > Monday, January 21, 2008, 2:42:53 PM, you wrote: > > > I was just browsing various versions of ipfw(8) such as: > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ipfw&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+6.3-stable&format=html > > > and noticed that (and 6.3-RELEASE) manuals sport 'FreeBSD 7.0' footers, > > however the proper FreeBSD 7 manual includes the new 'ipfw nat' section, > > so is different in at least that respect. > > As far as I know, this isn't a bug. The reason why you see "FreeBSD > 7.0" in the footer is that the machine, which is serving the online > manuals is running 7.0, but the real content of the man page is the > same as you will find in the 6.3-RELEASE. Ah that explains it, thanks Daniel. Strangely perhaps, the 4.10 online manual did say 4.10, but various others - before and since - say 7.0 .. they all seem to have the original dates in the footers. Saves a PR :) cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 15:20:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E52516A418 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:20:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (dsl081-163-122.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.163.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D742313C448 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:20:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from w16.stradamotorsports.com (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0NFKDWb086056; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:20:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <47975B36.608@highperformance.net> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:20:22 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sten Daniel Soersdal References: <4795F37B.4040908@gmail.com> <47960812.8070101@highperformance.net> <479702F4.1080709@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <479702F4.1080709@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=failed version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on s4.stradamotorsports.com Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Updating older 7.0 to newer sources, local buildworld problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:20:16 -0000 Sten Daniel Soersdal wrote: > > Thank you, i appreciate your time. > At the bottom of the (messy) mail i sent there was the error i get from > building sources. I think it's the same error, no matter what version of > sources i download. > Could it have any relations to any compiler version upgrades done in 7.0 > (not by me but by freebsd project)? How many versions of the source code did you try? In your case I recommend only 7.0-RELEASE. The terminology in your email makes me skeptical that you have tried what I recommended. Did you run cvsup? I highly recommend using cvsup to update your sources. It's slick. It's saves bandwidth. Plus it's the way that just about everyone who runs FreeBSD maintains there system. That means lot's of tech support. If you are just downloading sources using FTP, or perhaps sysinstall, then I recommend deleting all of /usr/src and re-FTP-ing the sources. I have never had a problem that could not be fixed by re-supping the sources. On rare occasion a breakage will be introduced by the freebsd project or you might cvsup most, but not all of a change that is being implemented. A re-sup has always worked for me. A re-sup has always been the very first thing that people on -questions have recommended. -RELEASES are never broken. At least not that I can recall. Try re-posting your question with the last twenty lines or so of your log file. Perhaps someone else will pick it up. They might be able to suss out the exact details of your problem. Regards, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 15:31:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CDC16A419 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:31:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D3F13C45A for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:31:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so4225239pyb.10 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:31:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=g+lE+jNvV08lJtQLRbx0DhEXoltU7Jf3wMpqNsB/LDs=; b=pOI9e5i6t+fZ/HEulFUTIE/j7SOJoSc6Bb/c7j9quZcXS5UmD0B/DtVygvvx/e0RK63lE8AWzt+9H/kekmvi3VCU5bsUbfT5kfEM56wnNsTdDpBGiiHqHPVwxiwZY7jY35svIBR8qe+2LPEk4JbBKUb7vt77FAJdA9JAJWf1auc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=mHIruWSE/u0+NMJKi6OQsLET03vmLQHIsZtxeQygOLPedcA2A9A1HppUCRA6vagfzfkkaW1QgCNkeQrhL7IRsy1pEXYhoTP+Vo5PGKhh+P4lupIXCWyMnUkVXbdOCQ02f2PpAA0a34Mn4n9tAt89iUsTnXcAIJVneaNSzINrYeU= Received: by 10.35.34.19 with SMTP id m19mr11062430pyj.2.1201102315282; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:31:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.109.18 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:31:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:31:55 -0300 From: Agus To: "Lowell Gilbert" In-Reply-To: <44ir1l4iqq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <44ir1l4iqq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Sendmail local only..... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:31:56 -0000 2008/1/22, Lowell Gilbert : > > Agus writes: > > > Just trying to make sendmail work locally only.....And by that i mean, i > > dont want sendmail to be able to relay or send mail to any other machine > > except for localhost.... > > > > How can i do this? I mean is there a way on rc.conf or i need to touch > the > > cf?? > > This is a very standard thing to do. See "man 8 sendmail.conf" > (as recommended by the rc.conf(8) manual). > There is no man for sendmail.conf, nor sendmail.cf..... The rc.conf only mentions the rc.sendmail... Giorgos, question...is it needed to put the sendmail_submit_enable="YES" sendmail_msp_queue_enable="YES" Although they are the default ones? Cheers, Agustin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 15:39:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B37F16A417 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:39:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@sigd.net) Received: from ms05.mailstreet2003.net (ms05.mailstreet2003.net [69.25.50.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A07013C4E3 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:39:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@sigd.net) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:39:51 -0500 Message-ID: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC22101211BD@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> In-Reply-To: <20080123094641.P1318@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: mfsbsd Thread-Index: AchdnLb5HtdaH1qIT/CELdKiPiL9fAAOWdRg References: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2210120D5E@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> <20080122232910.K2862@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2210121018@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> <20080123094641.P1318@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> From: "Chris Haulmark" To: "Wojciech Puchar" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: mfsbsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:39:21 -0000 >=20 > >>> remotely. > >> > >> it is already running freebsd? no need any extra tool to reinstall > it. > >> > > > > Are you implying to reinstall via sysinstall with new created slices > > with > > proper labels over ssh? >=20 > you didn't say you want repartition. > this way - not. Sorry about this. Anyone else got advice to do that? Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 15:40:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910B816A418 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:40:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mail.digitalfreaks.org (arbitor.digitalfreaks.org [216.151.95.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59FE813C459 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:40:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755F31768B; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:40:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.digitalfreaks.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.digitalfreaks.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62131-15; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:40:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.2.161] (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DAAF1769E; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:40:35 -0500 (EST) From: "Brian A. Seklecki" To: Nomad In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 10:40:34 -0500 Message-Id: <1201102834.26176.82.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.2 (2.12.2-3.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Server unreachable after quagga install from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:40:37 -0000 On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 23:50 -0600, Nomad wrote: > I just setup a server running FreeBSD 6.3. After the install I made some Ugh... show us: $ netstat -rn -f inet $ arp -an Any pf.conf(5) or rc.conf(5). Likely $defaultroute in rc.conf(5) is a short-lived value. ~BAS > Any information would be appreciated. > _______________________________________________ > freeb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 16:16:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601A716A419 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:16:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1668A13C467 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:16:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m0NGGsqU088159; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:16:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from john@jnielsen.net) Received: (from www@localhost) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id m0NGGs1r088158; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:16:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from john@jnielsen.net) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.jnielsen.net: www set sender to john@jnielsen.net using -f Received: from nc-2wac-zop05.wachovia.com (nc-2wac-zop05.wachovia.com [162.111.235.16]) by newwebmail.jnielsen.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:16:54 -0500 Message-ID: <20080123111654.o77i3ia94oo884sw@newwebmail.jnielsen.net> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:16:54 -0500 From: John Nielsen To: Chris Haulmark References: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2210120D5E@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> In-Reply-To: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2210120D5E@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.4) / FreeBSD-4.9 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mfsbsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:16:55 -0000 Quoting Chris Haulmark : > Anyone used mfsbsd to do remote install of a dedicated server with > success? No, but.. > Summary: > > A dedicated server has FreeBSD 6.x running with / as the entire > partition of the entire disk. Hoping to find a solution to do reinstall > remotely. That's unfortunate. Is it really the entire disk? If you even had, say, a swap partition you could potentially use it to bootstrap the process-- 1) Comment out swap line in /etc/fstab 2) Reboot 3) re-label and newfs the swap partition 4) dump/restore some or all of your existing setup to the new fs (or do a manual minimal install using sysinstall, or do an installworld with DESTDIR set to the new fs ...) 5) Change /etc/fstab on the ORIGINAL root partition (since that's still what you'll be booting from for now) to mount root from the new fs 6) Reboot and cross your fingers 7) Observe that the new fs is mounted and the original one is not. Make your partitioning changes. Move / restore / reinstall your directories and mountpoints as needed. 8) Make sure the /etc/fstab on the NEW root (preferrably on partition a) points to the right place. 9) Re-install the boot blocks on the disk and the slice for good measure (using fdisk and bsdlabel respectively) 10) Reboot and cross your fingers and toes 11) Observe that your original swap area is NOT mounted and that everything else is. Edit /etc/fstab to use your swap area for swap again. 12) swapon -a > depenguinator seems incompatible with the current latest FreeBSD > releases. > > Advices other than "DRAC, IPKM or hire a tech" are welcome. Using mfsbsd, depenguinator, or an approach like the one above there is at least one point in the process where you only get one chance to get it right. Depending on your personality this might be an adrenaline rush, but in any case you should have a backup plan such as DRAC, IPKM, or an available tech. Or an IP KVM (Belkin makes one that will let you use ISO images over the network as a USB CD). Or a serial console. etc. etc. JN From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 16:21:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20C4716A41B for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:21:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8253313C4DD for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:21:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0NGKss8002646; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:20:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0NGKoxW002643; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:20:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:20:50 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Chris Haulmark In-Reply-To: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC22101211BD@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> Message-ID: <20080123171931.V2491@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2210120D5E@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> <20080122232910.K2862@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2210121018@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> <20080123094641.P1318@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC22101211BD@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: mfsbsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:21:38 -0000 >>> Are you implying to reinstall via sysinstall with new created slices >>> with >>> proper labels over ssh? >> >> you didn't say you want repartition. >> this way - not. > > Sorry about this. Anyone else got advice to do that? > i made my own liveDVD, it would be as simple as giving 3 command to execute remotely (ifconfig, route and /etc/rc.d/sshd forcestart) someone on place. if you like - i could send it, but not today (my GPRS link isn't fast) please tell me if you like From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 16:44:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B3716A417 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:44:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD91813C4D3 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:44:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 8763D28453; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:44:07 -0500 (EST) To: Agus References: <44ir1l4iqq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:44:07 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Agus's message of "Wed\, 23 Jan 2008 12\:31\:55 -0300") Message-ID: <44wsq0mqzs.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Sendmail local only..... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:44:09 -0000 Agus writes: > 2008/1/22, Lowell Gilbert : >> >> Agus writes: >> >> > Just trying to make sendmail work locally only.....And by that i mean, i >> > dont want sendmail to be able to relay or send mail to any other machine >> > except for localhost.... >> > >> > How can i do this? I mean is there a way on rc.conf or i need to touch >> the >> > cf?? >> >> This is a very standard thing to do. See "man 8 sendmail.conf" >> (as recommended by the rc.conf(8) manual). >> > > > There is no man for sendmail.conf, nor sendmail.cf..... > The rc.conf only mentions the rc.sendmail... My apologies. That is, indeed, what I meant. > Giorgos, question...is it needed to put the > sendmail_submit_enable="YES" > sendmail_msp_queue_enable="YES" > Although they are the default ones? No. These are just shell variable assignments. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 16:44:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6731A16A417 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:44:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D96C13C458 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:44:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so4273409pyb.10 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:44:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=aWszDyO6N48Bh8ef6N0THPmMT2X8WaFbK4Qvs3ghylU=; b=UQzBlAELWCPRhshQj06IAhBQU5TQ8RCHm8jq0d09c4bwZl9SAnzOBLZCVOUJNMe0Ipo8vmN/4enHqyk+hCKq1lW043fuOSynmBkrouoin5iBznrmaZtV+4rNGreSD5EgD2VhB3U8q2TjQfw7v0eTCHwru6xYeQaNrjmOvfm45b8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=hsIkqxVv6TMlZ6lAhBPhV1U0Gt+QA0QUhfdrRF+XmQsWhpr3o3xP/dGQUwrhQCvwu6EgJwSar7X5eF3TvnbsyCMCFIZMrf3dYxEw1aZtoNEjeIS65lgNJ3+vb6m3vWDyeEiKORE9nYfmbqSk1MlJCxOhadgdqN3EDW7hWFGxLW4= Received: by 10.35.83.20 with SMTP id k20mr11153972pyl.7.1201106689602; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:44:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.109.18 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:44:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:44:49 -0300 From: Agus To: "Lowell Gilbert" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <44ir1l4iqq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Sendmail local only..... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:44:51 -0000 2008/1/23, Agus : > > 2008/1/22, Lowell Gilbert : > > > > Agus writes: > > > > > Just trying to make sendmail work locally only.....And by that i mean, > > i > > > dont want sendmail to be able to relay or send mail to any other > > machine > > > except for localhost.... > > > > > > How can i do this? I mean is there a way on rc.conf or i need to touch > > the > > > cf?? > > > > This is a very standard thing to do. See "man 8 sendmail.conf" > > (as recommended by the rc.conf(8) manual). > > > > > There is no man for sendmail.conf, nor sendmail.cf..... > The rc.conf only mentions the rc.sendmail... > > Giorgos, question...is it needed to put the > sendmail_submit_enable="YES" > sendmail_msp_queue_enable="YES" > Although they are the default ones? > > Cheers, > Agustin Maybe i wasnt clear...but with the options you gave me Giorgos i still can send email from localhost to external servers like hotmail for instance, through telnet.....I want to disable this, so it can only send mails to local accounts.... This is because this will be an open server with ssh access, so anyone with access will be able to send mails to everywhere, so i dont want this to happen.... Cheers and thanks for everyone that can help me... Agustin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 16:45:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F072A16A420 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:45:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: from mtao01.charter.net (mtao01.charter.net [209.225.8.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A58B13C457 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:45:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greenwood.andy@gmail.com) Received: from aarprv04.charter.net ([10.20.200.74]) by mtao01.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20080123164546.KOXK9082.mtao01.charter.net@aarprv04.charter.net>; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:45:46 -0500 Received: from agreenwood.dnsalias.com ([75.137.109.217]) by aarprv04.charter.net with ESMTP id <20080123164546.QFRJ17353.aarprv04.charter.net@agreenwood.dnsalias.com>; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:45:46 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agreenwood.dnsalias.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C80CA88; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:45:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from agreenwood.dnsalias.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zeus.agreenftp.no-ip.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UTobpd2EF7GN; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:45:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from hercules.nuvox.net (216.215.202.5.nw.nuvox.net [216.215.202.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: andy) by agreenwood.dnsalias.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2EF4CA83; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:45:40 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at agreenftp.no-ip.com Message-ID: <47976F4B.1020900@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:46:03 -0500 From: Andy Greenwood User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071101) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Bonnet References: <4796D9FC.8070802@esiee.fr> <47970D76.5050505@esiee.fr> In-Reply-To: <47970D76.5050505@esiee.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Chzlrs: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "lock screen" does not works at 6.3 + gnome2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:45:58 -0000 Frank Bonnet wrote: > Frank Bonnet wrote: >> Hello >> >> I've installed 6.3 on my machine with gnome2 and the "lock screen" >> function does not work with the standard install of GNOME2, is there >> some feature to install to make this available ? >> >> Thanks a lot. >> _______________________________________________ > > the screen saver does not work too ( and crash !) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I had the same problem with my 7.0-Beta3 box. I used xscreensaver instead of the default gnome-screensaver. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 17:12:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86A216A419 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:12:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF8F13C478 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:12:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0NH9t55027205; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:09:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m0NH9t9J027204; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:09:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:09:55 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: navneet Upadhyay Message-ID: <20080123170955.GF26684@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <1563a4fd0801222041r63c147e1he6e9853a50efd3b0@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1563a4fd0801222041r63c147e1he6e9853a50efd3b0@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Latest Stable FreeBSD version and its Dell 2950 Compatiblity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:12:34 -0000 On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 10:11:04AM +0530, navneet Upadhyay wrote: > Hi, > I need to know which is the latest stable FreeBSD release(6.2 ?) and > does it goes well with Dell 2950 ? I am presuming you are using the word 'stable' in a generic sense and not the official STABLE version sense - eg you want the version that is considered to be in place and reliable for use. If FreeBSD terminology, that is the RELEASE version. STABLE is used to reply to a sort of beta version that is reliable but still somewhat fluid in development. The term CURRENT is used for snapshots of the version that is being modified at the moment and which might not be reliable (but often is). So, you want FreeBSD 6.3 which just became a RELEASE version a few days ago. The 6.3 RELEASE is the latest and is a good place to start installation. If you want 7.0 features, then just wait a few days and it will also become RELEASE. The 7.0 branch is destined to become the new main branch quite soon and all work will be done on it (and, of course, head which is now 8.0, etc) One nice new feature available in 7.0 is ZFS. But, that is something people are just learning to use. If you look at the release notes for each branch, you will get brief descriptions of the changes and have an idea if those features are urgent for you. It is expected that no new major changes will be made to the 6.xx branch though bug fixes may cause another RELEASE (6.4) to be made before it is completely at end-of-life. ////jerry > > Thanks > Navneet > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 17:14:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31DA16A41B for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B985613C4D5 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0NHBwX1027243; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:11:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m0NHBwa7027242; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:11:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:11:58 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: navneet Upadhyay Message-ID: <20080123171158.GG26684@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <1563a4fd0801222041r63c147e1he6e9853a50efd3b0@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1563a4fd0801222041r63c147e1he6e9853a50efd3b0@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Latest Stable FreeBSD version and its Dell 2950 Compatiblity X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:14:37 -0000 On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 10:11:04AM +0530, navneet Upadhyay wrote: > Hi, > I need to know which is the latest stable FreeBSD release(6.2 ?) and > does it goes well with Dell 2950 ? I forgot to mention. Yes, 6.3 RELEASE (or even 6.2, but why bother with that now that 6.3 is out) will work just fine with a Dell 2950. I have put it on several. The upcoming 7.0 RELEASE will work on 2950-s too. ////jerry > > Thanks > Navneet > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 17:27:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0879B16A418 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:27:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3570313C455 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0NHQqcE005188; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:26:53 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk m0NHQqcE005188 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1201109213; bh=jmpkmCJ2lmv8Dh WBCd/VQHmPWdcZvy/8B0CwAo4wNEI=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Organization: User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc: Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Mime-Version: References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<479778DC.3090803@infracaninophile. co.uk>|Date:=20Wed,=2023=20Jan=202008=2017:26:52=20+0000|From:=20Ma tthew=20Seaman=20|Organization:=20 Infracaninophile|User-Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.9=20(X11/2008012 2)|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20Agus=20|CC:=20Lowe ll=20Gilbert=20,=20=0D=0A= 20freebsd-questions=20|Subject:=20Re :=20Sendmail=20local=20only.....|References:=20=09<44ir1l4iqq.fsf@be-well .ilk.org>=09=20|In-Reply-To:=20|X-Enigmail-Version:=200.95.0|Content-Type:=20text/plain =3B=20charset=3DISO-8859-1|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit; b=nZX ugx1ufNybg0zeHJBqKSOpRtg58VOo013SNMxgfprru/rWpaY0Yn/BkrR9wa5m957hhT CNc/zH7K06VnL3/MFg4qHTBaZ0OgRSEvH6lKNzx1fNZZOPaw+AoL5moeZOCGeAzz9yd 7TtVaZuB+hb1hi85OIIT5iVGR1cgUEk1Og= Message-ID: <479778DC.3090803@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:26:52 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080122) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Agus References: <44ir1l4iqq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:26:53 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/5531/Wed Jan 23 10:32:09 2008 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Sendmail local only..... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:27:05 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Agus wrote: > Maybe i wasnt clear...but with the options you gave me Giorgos i still can > send email from localhost to external servers like hotmail for instance, > through telnet.....I want to disable this, so it can only send mails to > local accounts.... > This is because this will be an open server with ssh access, so anyone with > access will be able to send mails to everywhere, so i dont want this to > happen.... Hmm... It's actually pretty hard to stop an MTA from being able to send e-mail, given that is what it is designed to do. A quick fix would be to use the firewall on the box to block connection to port 25 outgoing. Eg. with pf(4): block log out on $ext_if proto tcp \ from any to any port smtp However this will lead to outgoing messages clogging up the mail spool typically for five days, instead of being immediately rejected. You could try a custom sendmail configuration without the SMTP mailer - -- just delete the line saying: MAILER(smtp) at the end of `hostname`.mc and generate a sendmail .cf file in the usual way (ie. 'make all install') I am however not at all sure that even works -- sendmail documentation basically says the smtp mailer is mandatory. Another approach worth trying would be to use a wildcard mailertable entry that redirects any mail back to root the local machine: localhost local: your.host.name local: . local:root or replace the last line with: . error:Mail to external sites not allowed in order to reject the message instantly. This is all untried, so no guarantees of success, but experimenting along one or more of those lines should achieve what you want. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHl3jc8Mjk52CukIwRCNBvAJ941ZEAs+RnO7r0MR4S7wYH91oMWACeM01a pGXYxBKLwcqgybnT1l1Cb1E= =3A0Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 17:35:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C48816A418 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:35:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from ro-out-1112.google.com (ro-out-1112.google.com [72.14.202.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDF713C461 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:35:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by ro-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id d36so1065924roh.13 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:35:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.77.11 with SMTP id z11mr5121275wfa.23.1201109724211; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:35:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio ( [67.189.206.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 32sm16960748wri.9.2008.01.23.09.35.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:35:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:35:11 -0500 From: Gerard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080123123511.3177137c@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q User-Agent: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.3; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/GZgO969+EmjhLdcuxh.wjpa"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Subject: Perl-5.10.0 in FBSD-7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:35:26 -0000 --Sig_/GZgO969+EmjhLdcuxh.wjpa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have not been able to find any information in regards to the latest version of Perl, version 5.10.0, released in December. 1) When will this version be available in the ports system? 2) Will FreeBSD-7.0 use this as the default Perl version? It seems rather silly to use the older version as the default in FBSD-7.0 since a newer version is available. --=20 Gerard gerard@seibercom.net Misfortunes arrive on wings and leave on foot. --Sig_/GZgO969+EmjhLdcuxh.wjpa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkeXetAACgkQ6DWTaTcTwMlguQCfTJ7DeRv9YHn3IBiDAsOJTJQF +1wAoLXxfrOz2uuNSsh5jKxFJ22c9Lkz =2RLf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/GZgO969+EmjhLdcuxh.wjpa-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 17:40:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7064C16A421 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:40:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1BA13C458 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:40:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 68so1237503wra.13 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:40:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.212.19 with SMTP id k19mr5085672wfg.200.1201110003936; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:40:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.100.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h8sm20229379wxd.39.2008.01.23.09.40.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 09:40:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from asterix (asterix [192.168.17.23]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135C81140D for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:39:58 +0400 (GST) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:39:57 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@asterix.home.rakhesh.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080123213405.G8230@asterix.home.rakhesh.com> X-Blog: http://rakhesh.com/ X-Notes: http://rakhesh.net/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Subject: make buildworld 6.x on 7.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:40:06 -0000 Hi, Is it possible to do a ''make buildworld buildkernel'' of the FreeBSD 6.x series sources on a FreeBSD 7.x machine and then install them onto a FreeBSD 6.x machine? I ask coz currently I have 3 FreeBSD 6.2 machines and I build the world and kernel on one of them and install on the others (while updating etc). When FreeBSD 7 releases I plan to move one of the machines to that (and this is the machine on which I build stuff currently) so I was wondering if its possible to continue with things the way they are now ... I understand I'll have to build separate port packages for 7.x and 6.x but I maybe there's some workaround for the base system ...? Thanks, Rakhesh --- http://rakhesh.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 17:42:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F56116A418 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:42:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5067713C4D1 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:42:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 23 Jan 2008 12:42:26 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id JOX51311; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:42:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 23 Jan 2008 12:41:16 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18327.31864.197128.942495@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:42:16 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080123123511.3177137c@scorpio> References: <20080123123511.3177137c@scorpio> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Subject: Perl-5.10.0 in FBSD-7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 17:42:21 -0000 Gerard writes: > 2) Will FreeBSD-7.0 use this as the default Perl version? > > It seems rather silly to use the older version as the default in > FBSD-7.0 since a newer version is available. I don't speak for the Release Engineering team, but: almost certainly not. Perl is used by so many things that making the change before a .0 release is work for no necessary gain. It's practically a "Kick Me!" sign. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 18:06:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402A616A46D for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:06:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pouemes@free.fr) Received: from postfix2-g20.free.fr (postfix2-g20.free.fr [212.27.60.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFAFE13C448 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:06:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pouemes@free.fr) Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr (smtp4-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.30]) by postfix2-g20.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8E5229B751 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:25:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A153EA0C6 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:26:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from unknown (seb44-1-88-163-77-147.fbx.proxad.net [88.163.77.147]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id A885B3EA0EB for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:26:15 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <009901c85de5$0766a300$0900a8c0@unknown> From: "Pouemes" To: Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:26:02 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:06:36 -0000 http://pouemes.free.fr merci From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 18:07:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0BF16A421 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:07:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp3.utdallas.edu (smtp3.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6551D13C45B for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:07:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from utd59514.utdallas.edu (utd59514.utdallas.edu [129.110.3.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp3.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A10654FD for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:07:42 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:07:42 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <6453DAA1532FE742E7057C08@utd59514.utdallas.edu> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: RE: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:07:43 -0000 --On Tuesday, January 22, 2008 21:57:22 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Paul Schmehl >> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:25 AM >> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? >> >> >> --On Tuesday, January 22, 2008 13:03:27 +0100 Wojciech Puchar >> wrote: >> >> > http://www.spamsuite.com/node/351 >> > >> > jest first step to criminalize unix at all >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> We aren't criminals, but *he* is. >> > > Paul, you do realize that Sierra is a known newsgroup spammer and > that the lawsuit in question was just filed against a spamfighter > by a spammer? > Yes. > Also, that the "judgement" that is in the post is actually > a prepared order, written by Plaintiff's counsel, it wasn't > written by the judge. > Yes. > This case is sitting in the appellate courts somewhere, gathering > dust. Nobody has paid anything to anybody, except to the lawyers. > Sierra makes their money selling to morons what Google gives > out for free. > > Please, unless your willing to do the research, don't waste > time commenting. > He disobeyed a court order. That makes him a criminal. Whether what he was trying to do was "right" or not is irrelevant. Once the court told him to stop, he should have stopped. And yes, I know full well that bad people take advantage of our courts every day. -- Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 19:02:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9269816A46E for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:02:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bitabyss@gmail.com) Received: from cartman.xxiii.com (cartman.xxiii.com [208.62.177.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5835E13C442 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:02:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bitabyss@gmail.com) Received: from [172.23.23.190] (lan23.xxiii.com [208.62.177.50]) by cartman.xxiii.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0NJ2fnn069625; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:02:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bitabyss@gmail.com) Message-ID: <47978F63.2070107@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:02:59 -0500 From: Rob User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (Windows/20071210) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Agus References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Sendmail local only..... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:02:42 -0000 Agus wrote: > Just trying to make sendmail work locally only.....And by that i mean, i > dont want sendmail to be able to relay or send mail to any other machine > except for localhost.... I like to avoid sendmail all together. Install ports/mail/ssmtp Turn off sendmail: sendmail_enable="NONE" # Run the sendmail inbound daemon (YES/NO/NONE). sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" # Dequeue stuck mail (YES/NO). sendmail_submit_enable="NO" # Start a localhost-only MTA for mail submission >From pkg-descr: "A secure, effective and simple way of getting mail off a system to your mail hub. It contains no suid-binaries or other dangerous things - no mail spool to poke around in, and no daemons running in the background. Mail is simply forwarded to the configured mailhost. Extremely easy configuration. WARNING: the above is all it does; it does not receive mail, expand aliases or manage a queue. That belongs on a mail hub with a system administrator. WWW: http://packages.debian.org/testing/mail/ssmtp.html " -rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 19:09:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A53016A417 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:09:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3660813C4F4 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:09:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces@nabble.com) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JHkyz-0002V5-On for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:09:57 -0800 Message-ID: <15048921.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:09:57 -0800 (PST) From: lamana To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4793E904.5020608@george.lbl.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Nabble-From: lamana@seznam.cz References: <4792C632.5010502@lbl.gov> <4792D7A1.6020903@math.arizona.edu> <47939CBA.6090809@george.lbl.gov> <4793A534.7020705@math.arizona.edu> <4793E904.5020608@george.lbl.gov> Subject: Re: X -configure fails on 6.3-Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:09:58 -0000 h Manually adding Xorg package resolves the problem -- it installs everything. > So, the problem is likely a 6.3 installation bug, but I wonder no one > else complained it :-( > > Thanks for help, > -Jin > I had the same problem, manual xorg compilation with default switches worked flawlessly. The problem is probably in xorg package provided on 6.3 install cds. Thanks both of you Predrag and Jin =) -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/X--configure-fails-on-6.3-Release-tp14978407p15048921.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 19:12:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9C916A417 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jackbarnett@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EFA613C442 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:11:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jackbarnett@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so4334954pyb.10 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:11:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eTkDUi+jVoqwPzelKk4xzHGLhmlcMDue2cAGS4gnhgE=; b=jwCjLfqDRXQz9DbkZdPa9euj6fgYgxZmIh9vMLa/2SxbU/7/RTaYOu2/hfIummiYju6ucqHMj3kaP2GQJKjCuB/I63FsjBdO88kzL5l+6lhpjFEu5vJvaRtyQU+HWYXg6CkrNM3N1T6DmvYqWf8+hTwdBQSDt6SfKu38Fm2YtRA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wSkDPEqENRSN/g6VSFG1t58NO+9O++ZRBoGZpDVOXTj2PkAncqw32aXcvSzZJ17OyiH/0wD+mXlkkKkVvDVT7UIi/acc4wjjVQ08zlGO0eYnQsjIkKPDCa644vAtSUGGCqnsROEtOmRgrj4inT6co77qATy2++iHFDuchyVUO94= Received: by 10.35.99.5 with SMTP id b5mr11314662pym.25.1201115518974; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:11:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.17.10? ( [67.190.229.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f77sm29166674pyh.32.2008.01.23.11.11.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:11:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4797917B.4020600@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:11:55 -0600 From: Jack Barnett User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freebsd questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: VM Options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jackbarnett@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:12:00 -0000 Are there any good VM Options for FreeBSD? There is VMWare in ports; which I really like - but it's a few years old and still stuck on version 3 the last time I tried it. Are there any other options available? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 19:18:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB1416A421 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:18:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from vs159071.vserver.de (hiphopcorner.de [62.75.159.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB9713C448 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:18:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from [192.168.0.29] (IP-213157018232.static.heagmedianet.de [213.157.18.232]) by vs159071.vserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2757BE805E; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:18:45 +0000 (UTC) From: Norman Maurer To: jackbarnett@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <4797917B.4020600@gmail.com> References: <4797917B.4020600@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:18:37 +0100 Message-Id: <1201115917.6943.15.camel@norman-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Freebsd questions Subject: Re: VM Options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:18:47 -0000 Am Mittwoch, den 23.01.2008, 13:11 -0600 schrieb Jack Barnett: > Are there any good VM Options for FreeBSD? > > There is VMWare in ports; which I really like - but it's a few years old > and still stuck on version 3 the last time I tried it. > > Are there any other options available? If you just want to run other FreeBSD's I whould try jail ( man jail ). It's covered in the handbook too.. Cheer, Norman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 19:19:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A2716A46E for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52FB13C501 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:19:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47979341.1000100@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:19:29 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080123123511.3177137c@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20080123123511.3177137c@scorpio> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Perl-5.10.0 in FBSD-7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:19:31 -0000 Gerard wrote: > I have not been able to find any information in regards to the latest > version of Perl, version 5.10.0, released in December. > > 1) When will this version be available in the ports system? After 7.0 is released. > 2) Will FreeBSD-7.0 use this as the default Perl version? Not as it will be shipped, but users can upgrade to it later. I was going to say "easily upgrade", but that might turn out to be a lie :) Historically, new versions of perl are a recipe for large amounts of pain because of all the old perl code that stops working. It would be completely irresponsible to attempt that update prior to the release (and moreover, the packages are already finalized for 7.0 anyway, modulo security updates). Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 19:23:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E34316A419 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:23:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA7913C45D for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:23:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF16EBC3B; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:23:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:23:16 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: jackbarnett@gmail.com Message-Id: <20080123142316.2d3ef433.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <4797917B.4020600@gmail.com> References: <4797917B.4020600@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Freebsd questions Subject: Re: VM Options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:23:23 -0000 In response to Jack Barnett : > > Are there any good VM Options for FreeBSD? > > There is VMWare in ports; which I really like - but it's a few years old > and still stuck on version 3 the last time I tried it. VMWare on FreeBSD is a no-op. Someone should really remove that port. jail is your best option. See the handbook for details and install the ezjail port to make it more manageable. The drawback is that jail can only run other FreeBSD instances in the VM. Next up would be qemu. I use it a lot and it works a lot like VMWare. The disadvantage to qemu is that it's really slow. Down the list are a number of technologies in various stages of development, such as Xen. I don't recommend any of them at this time unless you want to help with development. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 19:32:42 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182D116A417 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:32:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A363A13C43E for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:32:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id y2so206363uge.37 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:32:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=YNy1nI7Zk0jlFcjTITLFPD80awXDk0a0dlbdbp1IyE0=; b=H8D/YWQ4L65hSWOfMCczUOzkCBkF17EYJsaKK5xNv05ASIHiczAtPHNb3da9Ap7PBlMXn3/A3vPN7CUjZg4YkpmO5rU+83Mnu03+o5nXUH/uZ+DrE/BtodsAHKmJt+EUQVvKINCy+rK/ujdmbpVvlxLjtRqepIiPPNDUj15riII= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=k2l49GcpVN9geHHYQmqSeEfbA7rPHDktknnCVdR0HMkDsxMjnO1rG/7WZdxiNDCs4ZBWSpE/T3tRIj6qhbOcEg5QnQwBlCNep+AC/TmE+iAjD95RpLTQQ5t4ZfkgJ/jkTxbsedG4Y363/GZZQ4AxUD7NjigBaf2iiQhpjO+iy+4= Received: by 10.78.176.20 with SMTP id y20mr13961185hue.36.1201116755356; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:32:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.130.5 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:32:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801231132vd110f7fp55ffa0baa0185de5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:32:35 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: Rob In-Reply-To: <47978F63.2070107@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47978F63.2070107@gmail.com> Cc: Agus , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Sendmail local only..... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:32:42 -0000 Hello, 2008/1/23, Rob : > Agus wrote: > > Just trying to make sendmail work locally only.....And by that i mean, i > > dont want sendmail to be able to relay or send mail to any other machine > > except for localhost.... > > I like to avoid sendmail all together. > > Install ports/mail/ssmtp > > Turn off sendmail: > sendmail_enable="NONE" # Run the sendmail inbound daemon (YES/NO/NONE). > sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" # Dequeue stuck mail (YES/NO). > sendmail_submit_enable="NO" # Start a localhost-only MTA for mail submission > > >From pkg-descr: > "A secure, effective and simple way of getting mail off a system to your > mail hub. It contains no suid-binaries or other dangerous things - no mail > spool to poke around in, and no daemons running in the background. Mail is > simply forwarded to the configured mailhost. Extremely easy configuration. > > WARNING: the above is all it does; it does not receive mail, expand aliases > or manage a queue. That belongs on a mail hub with a system administrator. > > WWW: http://packages.debian.org/testing/mail/ssmtp.html But this is not what OP has asked for! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 19:34:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71E416A41A for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:34:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mail.digitalfreaks.org (arbitor.digitalfreaks.org [216.151.95.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C155D13C45A for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:34:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C01178D3; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:34:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.digitalfreaks.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.digitalfreaks.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72767-10; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:34:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.2.161] (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.digitalfreaks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791F7178D1; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:34:03 -0500 (EST) From: "Brian A. Seklecki" To: jackbarnett@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <4797917B.4020600@gmail.com> References: <4797917B.4020600@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:34:03 -0500 Message-Id: <1201116843.26176.107.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.2 (2.12.2-3.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Maia Mailguard 1.0.2 Cc: Freebsd questions Subject: Re: VM Options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:34:06 -0000 On Wed, 2008-01-23 at 13:11 -0600, Jack Barnett wrote: > Are there any good VM Options for FreeBSD? > > There is VMWare in ports; which I really like - but it's a few years old Jails and as a Xen guest --- probably with a NetBSD or GNU/Linux host. There's always Solaris domain. >:} ~BAS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 19:51:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28ACD16A419 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atxnomad@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE8513C458 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:51:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from atxnomad@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so1803066wxd.7 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:51:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=0yMqhS8zk7DWU31losFwgronWLO/acpR9VkM5nXACOQ=; b=r00J1cgGtBjU1ysjTNVJB/NuYXhF/1sx1SHeSBc3nT4k97pi723hM3ltxpKwdjapAsToxR33lSchik7LHo2cCFxJBgWyKr1/uQb91gLayvaR37ZzunpmVPOtTNR0Y7g2BVoqP7smSa7CA4A36N3aTaWk5zKcnCXXv+50VdAqGGc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=VuYMFnYQlyjhN995RG+CkB05nCjmcVU+s6/jM3eX3fWlFFJr1FUsVqtU9yPQIwpwceM57L2wfflXsh47XEO1tuIyr/jXCjN1pYteuf8zyeZSCnlI8BwMbEs/B88wMSpT3/eH9VropOUztxtrR8209ZAxwTDi95k20X9HJojAtzI= Received: by 10.67.123.19 with SMTP id a19mr1144482ugn.4.1201117892270; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:51:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.67.31.4 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 11:51:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 13:51:32 -0600 From: Nomad To: "Brian A. Seklecki" In-Reply-To: <1201102834.26176.82.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1201102834.26176.82.camel@soundwave.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Server unreachable after quagga install from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:51:34 -0000 On 1/23/08, Brian A. Seklecki wrote: > > > On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 23:50 -0600, Nomad wrote: > > I just setup a server running FreeBSD 6.3. After the install I made > some > > > Ugh... show us: > > $ netstat -rn -f inet > $ arp -an > > Any pf.conf(5) or rc.conf(5). Likely $defaultroute in rc.conf(5) is a > short-lived value. > > ~BAS > > > Any information would be appreciated. UGH is right ... have you ever sent a message and then 1/2 a second after you hit SEND you realized you're an idiot and you overlooked something extremely obvious? Well that's me in this case .... turns out in my quagga config I had the native interface in shutdown. Sorry. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 20:27:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1690F16A41B for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718D113C4EA; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:27:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4797A321.3050704@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:27:13 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rakhesh Sasidharan References: <20080123213405.G8230@asterix.home.rakhesh.com> In-Reply-To: <20080123213405.G8230@asterix.home.rakhesh.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make buildworld 6.x on 7.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:27:15 -0000 Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to do a ''make buildworld buildkernel'' of the FreeBSD > 6.x series sources on a FreeBSD 7.x machine and then install them onto a > FreeBSD 6.x machine? Yes, I did this a few minutes ago in fact :) No special procedures are necessary, world builds are already suitably isolated from the host system for this to work. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 20:36:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54BC416A41A for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:36:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=0901ed63a1@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [208.31.42.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C345B13C455 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:36:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=johnl=0901ed63a1@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 3015 invoked from network); 23 Jan 2008 20:09:56 -0000 Received: from simone.iecc.com (208.31.42.47) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 23 Jan 2008 20:09:56 -0000 Date: 23 Jan 2008 20:10:02 -0000 Message-ID: <20080123201002.2899.qmail@simone.iecc.com> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6453DAA1532FE742E7057C08@utd59514.utdallas.edu> Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: pauls@utdallas.edu Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:36:37 -0000 > He disobeyed a court order. That makes him a criminal. Whether > what he was trying to do was "right" or not is irrelevant. Once the > court told him to stop, he should have stopped. I happen to know David Ritz, and it would be extraordinarily out of character for him to have violated a court order. I don't know the exact sequence of alleged events since most of the court papers are sealed, but I do know that for part of the time he was in a coma in the hospital. As others have noted, the judge accepted the plaintiff's claims at face value, even though there are strong reasons to doubt his veracity. This is a travesty of justice, nothing more, nothing less. R's, John PS: It doesn't have much to do with FreeBSD, either. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 21:23:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F51516A418 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:23:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Received: from accord.grasslake.net (accord.grasslake.net [209.98.56.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B66813C4EA for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:23:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Received: from [192.168.1.44] (quattro.grasslake.net [192.168.1.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: swb) by accord.grasslake.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C574FFD031 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:24:20 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4797B05F.6020201@grasslake.net> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:23:43 -0600 From: Shawn Barnhart Organization: Managed Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Buildworld for slow system on faster system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:23:45 -0000 My primary FreeBSD box is a Dual P3 700 Mhz, which is dandy for my console mode server usage but kind of blows for buildworld and kernels when I want them done a timely fashion. I'd like to do it in a dual-proc VM on my quad core workstation, where it gets done a lot faster. Is there any documentation for doing buildworld on a faster system for a slower system? Can I just mount the slow system's /usr/src on a mountpoint on the faster system, do the buildworld and buildkernel, and then run the installworld and installkernel as per normal on the slow system? It sounds too easy, so it probably is.. What about ports? I can usually tolerate the ports build times, so its not a big deal, although sometimes the dependencies and larger packages can be toe-tappers as well. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 21:24:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF3716A419 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:24:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D61113C4E7 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:24:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite ([24.166.217.200]) by hrndva-omta04.mail.rr.com with SMTP id <20080123212450.UGUX17975.hrndva-omta04.mail.rr.com@satellite> for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:24:50 +0000 Message-ID: <002301c85e06$4f45ac40$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:24:16 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Subject: samba 3.28 on 6.3 produces configure no locking error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:24:51 -0000 Hello, I am trying to install samba 3.28 on a freebsd 6.3 machine via ports. I've done this before many times, on this particular machine configure is failing with the error: no locking is available, running samba would be unsafe. I've googled and have seen this error, but no fixes. Any suggestions welcome. If it matters this is on a ufs2 filesystem with acls, and softupdates on it. It's also not mounted with any special mount options. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 22:25:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF5E16A46D for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:25:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rol@robert-eckardt.de) Received: from cg-p07-fb.rzone.de (cg-p07-fb.rzone.de [81.169.146.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D8A13C45A for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:25:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rol@robert-eckardt.de) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mrclete-mo-p00-ob.mail [192.168.63.64]) by charnel-fb-07.store (RZmta 15.6) with ESMTP id G042c5k0NGYTjc ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:54:49 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from: ) X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 X-RZG-AUTH: kN+8IwndSMLtCuBFVkRfThJXBOX2xi0RUSsjpsWeoPRmTmyCUDrmirx0itdJuLTOx88N Received: from postit (frnk-590ea811.pool.einsundeins.de [89.14.168.17]) by post.webmailer.de (mrclete mo17) (RZmta 15.4) with ESMTP id w01c6ek0NGZIS1 ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:53:34 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from: ) Received: from www.home.roberte.eu (localhost.home.roberte.eu [127.0.0.1]) by postit (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0NLrVk7053634; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:53:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rol@robert-eckardt.de) From: "Robert Eckardt" To: Bill Moran , jackbarnett@gmail.com Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:53:31 +0100 Message-Id: <20080123213211.M8757@Robert-Eckardt.de> In-Reply-To: <20080123142316.2d3ef433.wmoran@potentialtech.com> References: <4797917B.4020600@gmail.com> <20080123142316.2d3ef433.wmoran@potentialtech.com> X-Mailer: OpenWebMail 2.52 20060502 X-OriginatingIP: 192.168.183.50 (roberte) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: Freebsd questions Subject: Re: VM Options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:25:51 -0000 On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:23:16 -0500, Bill Moran wrote > In response to Jack Barnett : > > > > Are there any good VM Options for FreeBSD? > > > > There is VMWare in ports; which I really like - but it's a few years old > > and still stuck on version 3 the last time I tried it. It depends on what you want to do. Do you want to run another OS (even a different FreeBSD release)? Is it sufficient to prevent processes seeing each other? > VMWare on FreeBSD is a no-op. Someone should really remove that port. That's nonsense. The current (very old) port is quite out-dated and it took me some time to get it running right e.g. with VMware 3 on FreeBSD 6.2. But it works! In most (though not all) cases Xen is a useful alternative to VMware. Of course Xen is driven by the Linux hype. All majors OS vendors support Xen. When virtualization solutions find their way into next generation's CPUs Xen might take over VMware. Xen is still weak on the management side. About a year ago rsync.net's 2007 code bounty called for a newer VMware port, but it's still in the state "currently in progress" (for half a year now). > jail is your best option. See the handbook for details and install the > ezjail port to make it more manageable. The drawback is that jail > can only run other FreeBSD instances in the VM. Although jails are available far longer than zones in Solaris they have fallen behind. They lack a lot of features, e.g. no ressource management. Even things that work in native FreeBSD don't work in jails. (ulimit) > Next up would be qemu. I use it a lot and it works a lot like > VMWare. The disadvantage to qemu is that it's really slow. VMware burns quite a lot of CPU. QEMU is much worse. > Down the list are a number of technologies in various stages of > development, such as Xen. I don't recommend any of them at this time > unless you want to help with development. It really depends on what you want to achieve. Regards, Robert PS: People say, I sometimes tend to see things to negative. -- Dr. Robert Eckardt --- Robert.Eckardt@Robert-Eckardt.de From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 22:29:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEE816A41B for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brent.jones@otago.ac.nz) Received: from mailhub2.otago.ac.nz (mailhub2.otago.ac.nz [139.80.64.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6805313C478 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brent.jones@otago.ac.nz) Received: from its-ex-p05.registry.otago.ac.nz (its-ex-p05.registry.otago.ac.nz [10.4.15.134]) by mailhub2.otago.ac.nz (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0NMTh5X024136; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:29:52 +1300 Received: from its-ex-p04.registry.otago.ac.nz ([10.4.15.133]) by its-ex-p05.registry.otago.ac.nz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:29:47 +1300 Received: from MAIL1.registry.otago.ac.nz ([10.4.15.129]) by its-ex-p04.registry.otago.ac.nz with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:29:47 +1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:29:46 +1300 Message-ID: <31AE442CCBC1094ABC40CE85B0149F06523740@MAIL1.registry.otago.ac.nz> In-Reply-To: <4797B05F.6020201@grasslake.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Buildworld for slow system on faster system Thread-Index: AcheBlpoF9zRC5o0R1O4IHn1taCLxAACDoNA References: <4797B05F.6020201@grasslake.net> From: "Brent Jones" To: "Shawn Barnhart" , "FreeBSD" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Jan 2008 22:29:47.0546 (UTC) FILETIME=[75E40FA0:01C85E0F] X-PMX-Version: 5.4.0.320885, Antispam-Engine: 2.5.2.313940, Antispam-Data: 2008.1.23.141250 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __IMS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Cc: Subject: RE: Buildworld for slow system on faster system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:29:54 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=20 > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of=20 > Shawn Barnhart > Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2008 10:24 a.m. > To: FreeBSD > Subject: Buildworld for slow system on faster system >=20 > My primary FreeBSD box is a Dual P3 700 Mhz, which is dandy for my=20 > console mode server usage but kind of blows for buildworld=20 > and kernels=20 > when I want them done a timely fashion. I'd like to do it in a=20 > dual-proc VM on my quad core workstation, where it gets done=20 > a lot faster. >=20 What you propose works fine, but you should have the /usr/src and /usr/obj directories locally stored on your fast machine for the builds. Then have your slow machine nfs mount /usr/src and /usr/obj from your fast machine, and simply do your make installs from your slow system. The same holds true for /usr/ports. Install/upgrade your ports with the -p (build packages) option on your fast machine, and then on your slow machine install/upgrade them with the -P option (use packages) after nfs mounting /usr/ports. Cheers, Brent From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 22:36:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BB316A477 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:36:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF9E13C461 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0NMXxZ5058927; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:33:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0NMXqns058924; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:33:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:33:52 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Norman Maurer In-Reply-To: <1201115917.6943.15.camel@norman-laptop> Message-ID: <20080123233310.B53473@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <4797917B.4020600@gmail.com> <1201115917.6943.15.camel@norman-laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: jackbarnett@gmail.com, Freebsd questions Subject: Re: VM Options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:36:02 -0000 > > If you just want to run other FreeBSD's I whould try jail ( man jail ). > It's covered in the handbook too.. and it works PERFECT. i run 14 jails on one machine, no problems. the only (but big) disadventage are lack of IPv6 in jail. hope it will be fixed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 22:40:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F5416A421 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:40:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A8D13C44B for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:40:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so2857252rvb.43 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:40:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=cEoJJE9txTS2W5FEAfQmaZp3MK6PxCCJ50FaIKMFyGw=; b=pHFo+oEpJFX7AGE7p0y0HGll14usRm1u+qrRJWfVG2xee8As/IYecybZtdQH6pQehI6kVPbKd5GBPPSVFZeNmRC/QYBcfYadzruXpsm7ikPavlLFxnGecRIrmW0WpTFuEUHYYDNQ4FLEsppZUzOi9GFxBJ1pT+yszKMjBfg9DAU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=cYesRnzy+xe4hcqkbdrkowVtc566K5fC5OIktt9eRQ0CY6pFODTGRJIxE0UYYI3N0jDbPgL4r/oD6Vg3LRpjdx/bJcwv31bkeziMtdptNWwhY0laXpq1GcyT6c5r92y7HEGxqyaTADAE1Af7AKQtupmVjuqfhKgxFmYRWqX1/CY= Received: by 10.141.33.21 with SMTP id l21mr6743392rvj.140.1201128056103; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:40:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.49.19 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 14:40:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:40:56 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: "Shawn Barnhart" In-Reply-To: <4797B05F.6020201@grasslake.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4797B05F.6020201@grasslake.net> Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Buildworld for slow system on faster system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:40:57 -0000 On 23/01/2008, Shawn Barnhart wrote: > My primary FreeBSD box is a Dual P3 700 Mhz, which is dandy for my > console mode server usage but kind of blows for buildworld and kernels > when I want them done a timely fashion. I'd like to do it in a > dual-proc VM on my quad core workstation, where it gets done a lot faster. > > Is there any documentation for doing buildworld on a faster system for a > slower system? Can I just mount the slow system's /usr/src on a > mountpoint on the faster system, do the buildworld and buildkernel, and > then run the installworld and installkernel as per normal on the slow > system? It sounds too easy, so it probably is.. It is /usr/obj you want to mount across, though it will work. Assuming they're similar enough versions. Also assure yourself that their respective /etc/make.conf (and/or /etc/src.conf) files are essentially identical, or you will great sorrows have. If /usr/obj is nfs mounted on the _build_ machine it will slow down your build times absurdly, unless your network (minus overhead) is nearly as fast as your HDD controller. > > What about ports? I can usually tolerate the ports build times, so its > not a big deal, although sometimes the dependencies and larger packages > can be toe-tappers as well. > Sure, just use the package-recursive target and use pkg_add on the install machine(1). (1) details elided -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 23 23:48:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5485416A419 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:48:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from santa.ssh@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC2E13C45B for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:48:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from santa.ssh@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id y2so263512uge.37 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:48:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:x-mailer:x-priority:message-id:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fmmF0ZpDqoVCzZbEpt9PXaO5HCqZpM1ASRKMYgNQBVc=; b=msIaSs2xPKzwIF/mv3XJTh2CQrm8OFXbk2hZjDzTlgAcKYhK3+DGeAeziqHQ1K44z+W5ilyA0QiWFeY/3CLM2EMUwiRp+Kwjes0CscnkJMT5HVeNmNQgyy9zTiLerpKeg5OY4P8JA5SiP9IHC6Ne2zxY364BuxK4vEXfDRy8BCA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:x-mailer:x-priority:message-id:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KqHsxdXlULgSGyJkovvl/7MXdM/QqlNfvOOfp8I+wUvyDM3g21V8IlNz4WeHtwzJmHZ1xuvXZ8UO0SC8b/NEWjANr4/mvD/eP51s4i/zMVx7a7+RIZzaHzZEU69hCZW2Ur2m7BPeTBOkSZFGYdWZMmvbRc3vkjeDzkZRTWw7u5w= Received: by 10.67.115.9 with SMTP id s9mr1489036ugm.81.1201130355802; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:19:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from SANTA ( [193.37.156.226]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b39sm3240246ugf.27.2008.01.23.15.19.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:19:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:18:03 +0200 From: Santa X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.98.1) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1398083685.20080124011803@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Mouse_problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 23:48:31 -0000 Hello! I have an optical mouse A4tech model WOP-35 (optical). It does not work in FreeBSD 6.2 (using x-window or moused) but being detected while booting (irc12 as usual) and mounted on psm0. What is the reason of such a bug? How could it be fixed? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 00:51:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C511116A419 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:51:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@ridecharge.com) Received: from EXHUB015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-3.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F4D13C465 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:51:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@ridecharge.com) Received: from philip.hq.rws (74.93.213.161) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.0.744.0; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:50:59 -0800 Message-ID: <4797E0F2.2080307@ridecharge.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:50:58 -0500 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: Ridecharge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070919) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Inspiron 1721 w/ FreeBSD 8-current X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:51:00 -0000 Hi, I'd like to get the following hardware can anyone recommend compatibility? 1) Sprint Card [a howto would be good too] 2) Wireless USB Mouse [I can probably rtfm for this one] 3) Sound Card [built in doesn't work -- http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=111767, I tried the fix, but doesn't help] It doesn't have to be great, just work. 4) 2+GB USB Thumb Drive. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (philip@ridecharge.com) o:703.549.2050x206 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com / http://ridecharge.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 00:54:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB2116A417 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:54:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: from rn-out-0102.google.com (rn-out-0910.google.com [64.233.170.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0212213C4E3 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:54:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from agus.262@gmail.com) Received: by rn-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id s42so555rnb.13 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:54:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=18PwTQ3t6N/uqV1xwLZtZJpObozKyFrakyZ56uy4EVY=; b=Dold/12BlBvvbA18rcMa0f7qTcE8Ru325Ni9JkSqzkBXRijixy4vodmoe5DVnhy6Riqu/LZ11fZgqowz5pXOvSXaJYXyWy6Nt7pe92dowEt/uNiX+iVB4yGzuEJR5bAe2QweLsOyZdLVjnpDrWnTAAaZ4qVgsRfUIcxK2LKltLY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=cW16GJKyqBlP46B3hwqzJUwo1EePUziqDuXtxE42Xh+QuN0pu0pSAZzD1uSdla/JycYsCf8BEYES4oXwp7vau3+v1/jYwYxe/K+6TGCdMB5MHKswu5oyXvorORSlTPKE2abcF2gDs8d3dufALKxpFQD9nNH5v/oDJ8o5i+ve2iI= Received: by 10.151.10.7 with SMTP id n7mr12143ybi.75.1201136048296; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:54:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.8.1 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 16:54:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:54:08 -0300 From: Agus To: "Zbigniew Szalbot" In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801231132vd110f7fp55ffa0baa0185de5@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <47978F63.2070107@gmail.com> <94136a2c0801231132vd110f7fp55ffa0baa0185de5@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Rob , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Sendmail local only..... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 00:54:10 -0000 2008/1/23, Zbigniew Szalbot : > > Hello, > > 2008/1/23, Rob : > > Agus wrote: > > > Just trying to make sendmail work locally only.....And by that i mean, > i > > > dont want sendmail to be able to relay or send mail to any other > machine > > > except for localhost.... > > > > I like to avoid sendmail all together. > > > > Install ports/mail/ssmtp > > > > Turn off sendmail: > > sendmail_enable="NONE" # Run the sendmail inbound daemon > (YES/NO/NONE). > > sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" # Dequeue stuck mail (YES/NO). > > sendmail_submit_enable="NO" # Start a localhost-only MTA for mail > submission > > > > >From pkg-descr: > > "A secure, effective and simple way of getting mail off a system to your > > mail hub. It contains no suid-binaries or other dangerous things - no > mail > > spool to poke around in, and no daemons running in the background. Mail > is > > simply forwarded to the configured mailhost. Extremely easy > configuration. > > > > WARNING: the above is all it does; it does not receive mail, expand > aliases > > or manage a queue. That belongs on a mail hub with a system > administrator. > > > > WWW: http://packages.debian.org/testing/mail/ssmtp.html > > But this is not what OP has asked for! > > Zbigniew Szalbot > Right, this seems to be pretty cool if you want to relay mail with just four lines...but i want to deliver locally only... I think i will go like Mathew says... Cheers, Agustin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 01:05:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FA716A41B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:05:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf00.insightbb.com (mxsf00.insightbb.com [74.128.0.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6D113C461 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:05:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,241,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="194017294" Received: from unknown (HELO asav01.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.124]) by mxsf00.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 23 Jan 2008 19:54:59 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,241,1199682000"; d="scan'208";a="111145492" Received: from 208-46-39-11.dia.static.qwest.net (HELO [10.7.44.143]) ([208.46.39.11]) by asavout01.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 23 Jan 2008 19:54:59 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:54:31 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801231954.32048.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Subject: sendmail config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:05:05 -0000 I configured KMail with SSL to send mail from a foreign network thru my broadband ISP. This works fine. I want to be able to use send-pr, and thought I might me able to configure sendmail as outgoing only. I have sendmail_enable="NO" in /etc/rc.conf. local mail works fine. I don't want incoming from the Internet. I copied /etc/mail/freebsd.mc to laptop.mc and set SMART_HOST to mail.insightbb.com and moved sendmail.cf to sendmailcf.sav. I compiled laptop.mc with m4 /usr/share/sendmail/cf/m4/cf.m4 laptop.mc I then copied laptop.cf to sendmail.cf and rebooted. Now, the response is "Service not available", but I think it's because I don't have sendmail configured to use SSL, like KMail. Is it possible? I have read the Handbook and an old version of "Unix System Administration Handbook", and the README in /usr/share/sendmail/cf, and in /etc/mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 01:41:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F43116A41B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Received: from accord.grasslake.net (accord.grasslake.net [209.98.56.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21C713C44B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Received: from [192.168.1.44] (quattro.grasslake.net [192.168.1.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: swb) by accord.grasslake.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB04FD031; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:41:42 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4797ECB2.90207@grasslake.net> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:41:06 -0600 From: Shawn Barnhart Organization: Managed Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "illoai@gmail.com" References: <4797B05F.6020201@grasslake.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Buildworld for slow system on faster system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:41:08 -0000 illoai@gmail.com wrote: > It is /usr/obj you want to mount across, though it > will work. Assuming they're similar enough > versions. Also assure yourself that their respective > /etc/make.conf (and/or /etc/src.conf) files are > essentially identical, or you will great sorrows > have. > > I'm not that much of a system hacker, so I doubt either will get edited. I don't even have a src.conf on my 6_STABLE system, but regardless, it won't be an issue to keep them in sync. > If /usr/obj is nfs mounted on the _build_ machine > it will slow down your build times absurdly, unless > your network (minus overhead) is nearly as fast as > your HDD controller. > It's gigabit, so it'd be about as good as it can get. It sounds like the thing to do is just do the builds on the fast machine, and then mount THAT machine's /usr/src and /usr/obj on the slow machine when it comes time to installworld. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 01:51:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0897E16A565 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:51:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-out-04.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D13213C44B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:51:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-av-01.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-04.forthnet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0O1pT7N023594; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:51:29 +0200 Received: from MX-IN-03.forthnet.gr (mx-in-05.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.32]) by mx-av-01.forthnet.gr (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0O1pTAj031012; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:51:29 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (ppp133-151.adsl.forthnet.gr [62.1.124.151]) by MX-IN-03.forthnet.gr (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0O1pQct001348; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:51:27 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-03.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-03.forthnet.gr header.from=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; sender-id=neutral Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0O1pP9w008913; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:51:25 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m0O1pOdY008912; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:51:24 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:51:24 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Steven Friedrich Message-ID: <20080124015124.GA7150@kobe.laptop> References: <200801231954.32048.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200801231954.32048.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail config X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:51:32 -0000 On 2008-01-23 19:54, Steven Friedrich wrote: > I configured KMail with SSL to send mail from a foreign network thru my > broadband ISP. This works fine. > > I want to be able to use send-pr, and thought I might me able to configure > sendmail as outgoing only. I have sendmail_enable="NO" in /etc/rc.conf. > > local mail works fine. I don't want incoming from the Internet. > > I copied /etc/mail/freebsd.mc to laptop.mc and set SMART_HOST to > mail.insightbb.com and moved sendmail.cf to sendmailcf.sav. I compiled > laptop.mc with m4 /usr/share/sendmail/cf/m4/cf.m4 laptop.mc > > I then copied laptop.cf to sendmail.cf and rebooted. There's a much easier way to generate `sendmail.cf' and `submit.cf' on FreeBSD. After reading the comments in `/etc/mail/Makefile', especially the part shown below: # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ # This Makefile uses `.mc' as the default MTA .mc file. This # can be changed by defining SENDMAIL_MC in /etc/make.conf, e.g.: # # SENDMAIL_MC=/etc/mail/myconfig.mc # # If '.mc' does not exist, it is created using 'freebsd.mc' # as a template. # # It also uses '.submit.mc' as the default mail submission .mc # file. This can be changed by defining SENDMAIL_SUBMIT_MC in # /etc/make.conf, e.g.: # # SENDMAIL_SUBMIT_MC=/etc/mail/mysubmit.mc # # If '.submit.mc' does not exist, it is created using # 'freebsd.submit.mc' as a template. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ You can set up a `sendmail.cf' and `submit.cf' file by: 0. Set up the `rc.conf' options for local delivery only, and to forward all other messages to the SMART_HOST relay. sendmail_enable="NO" sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" sendmail_submit_enable="YES" sendmail_msp_queue_enable="YES" 1. Editing `/etc/make.conf' and setting SENDMAIL_MC and SENDMAIL_SUBMIT_MC to: SENDMAIL_MC?= /etc/mail/laptop.mc SENDMAIL_SUBMIT_MC?= /etc/mail/laptop.submit.mc 2. Backup your current `laptop.mc' and `laptop.submit.mc' if any. 3. Copy the original `freebsd.mc' to `laptop.mc' and the original `submit.mc' to `freebsd.submit.mc' in `/etc/mail': # cd /etc/mail # cp freebsd.mc laptop.mc # cp freebsd.submit.mc laptop.submit.mc 4. Edit the new `laptop.mc' file and set SMART_HOST. 5. Use the standard `Makefile' to build and install the new *.cf files: # cd /etc/mail # make all && make install Now you should be able to start Sendmail with: # /etc/rc.d/sendmail stop # /etc/rc.d/sendmail start > Now, the response is "Service not available", but I think it's because > I don't have sendmail configured to use SSL, like KMail. The standard `freebsd.mc' distributed with FreeBSD sources doesn't force the use of SSL or TLS. You should be able to use it without SSL. If you have made modifications to the original `freebsd.mc' file, you can restore it by copying a fresh version of the same file from their pristine copies included in the source tree of FreeBSD: /usr/src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc /usr/src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.submit.mc HTH, Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 01:52:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D8F516A41B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:52:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Received: from accord.grasslake.net (accord.grasslake.net [209.98.56.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF75513C469 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:52:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swb@grasslake.net) Received: from [192.168.1.44] (quattro.grasslake.net [192.168.1.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: swb) by accord.grasslake.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7CEFD03B; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:53:23 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <4797EF70.40103@grasslake.net> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:52:48 -0600 From: Shawn Barnhart Organization: Managed Chaos User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brent Jones References: <4797B05F.6020201@grasslake.net> <31AE442CCBC1094ABC40CE85B0149F06523740@MAIL1.registry.otago.ac.nz> In-Reply-To: <31AE442CCBC1094ABC40CE85B0149F06523740@MAIL1.registry.otago.ac.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Buildworld for slow system on faster system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:52:49 -0000 Brent Jones wrote: > What you propose works fine, but you should have the /usr/src and > /usr/obj directories locally stored on your fast machine for the builds. > Then have your slow machine nfs mount /usr/src and /usr/obj from your > fast machine, and simply do your make installs from your slow system. > Thanks. I'm assuming on the slow install system I have to keep /usr/src and /usr/obj mounted from the fast build box on their "correct" directories (ie, over the local system's /usr/src and /usr/obj) otherwise I'll have problems. As the other person who replied pointed out, nfs mounting /usr/src and /usr/obj from the slow system to the fast system would nullify a lot of the speed advantage (although it is 100% GigE), but would let me keep the working /usr/src and /usr/obj on the slow machine, which is the one that is actually getting used. On a somewhat related question, which FreeBSD install choice gives me enough development tools to "make installworld" if I have /usr/src and /usr/obj nfs mounted from a full source system but doesn't actually burden the system in question with unnecessary components? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 02:04:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86DB16A417 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:04:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-out-04.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C9C13C447 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:04:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-av-02.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-04.forthnet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0O24VAq032024; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:04:31 +0200 Received: from MX-IN-02.forthnet.gr (mx-in-02.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.185]) by mx-av-02.forthnet.gr (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0O24VgK025071; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:04:31 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (ppp133-151.adsl.forthnet.gr [62.1.124.151]) by MX-IN-02.forthnet.gr (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0O24NR2032711; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:04:24 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-02.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-02.forthnet.gr header.from=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; sender-id=neutral Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0O24Mu4009621; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:04:22 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m0O24Ks9009620; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:04:20 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:04:20 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Agus , Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20080124020420.GB7150@kobe.laptop> References: <44ir1l4iqq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <479778DC.3090803@infracaninophile.co.uk> <44ir1l4iqq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <479778DC.3090803@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Sendmail local only..... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:04:36 -0000 On 2008-01-23 13:44, Agus wrote: >> Giorgos, question...is it needed to put the >> sendmail_submit_enable="YES" >> sendmail_msp_queue_enable="YES" >> Although they are the default ones? > > Maybe i wasnt clear...but with the options you gave me Giorgos i still > can send email from localhost to external servers like hotmail for > instance, through telnet.....I want to disable this, so it can only > send mails to local accounts.... Ah, I misunderstood the original question. My apologies. On 2008-01-23 17:26, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Hmm... It's actually pretty hard to stop an MTA from being able to > send e-mail, given that is what it is designed to do. Hehe, indeed :) > Another approach worth trying would be to use a wildcard mailertable > entry that redirects any mail back to root the local machine: > > > localhost local: > your.host.name local: > . local:root That should work fine :) > or replace the last line with: > > . error:Mail to external sites not allowed That's a great idea to build upon. >From the limited testing I did just now, bounces still go through, so someone may abuse this to post email by setting the sender address to the intended recipient, and posting to random outside mailboxes. The following works too (after setting up a local dev-null alias): localhost local: my.hostname local: . local:dev-null This silently drops email messages, but at least it logs the delivery to the dev-null alias, so there's a trace of the email message even though it won't really get delivered to any user's mailbox and there's no error responce sent to anyone. Jan 24 03:57:09 kobe sendmail[9255]: m0O1ura8009255: from=keramida@kobe, \ size=83, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200801240156.m0O1ura8009255@kobe.laptop>, \ relay=keramida@localhost Jan 24 03:57:09 kobe sendmail[9255]: m0O1ura8009255: to=keramida@linux.gr, \ ctladdr=keramida@kobe (1000/1000), delay=00:00:16, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=relay, \ pri=30083, relay=[127.0.0.1] [127.0.0.1], dsn=2.0.0, \ stat=Sent (m0O1v94R009303 Message accepted for delivery) Jan 24 03:57:09 kobe smtpd[9303]: m0O1v94R009303: from=, \ size=374, class=0, nrcpts=1, msgid=<200801240156.m0O1ura8009255@kobe.laptop>, \ proto=ESMTP, daemon=Daemon0, relay=kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1] Jan 24 03:57:09 kobe smtpd[9307]: m0O1v94R009303: to=/dev/null, \ ctladdr=bit-bucket (26/0), delay=00:00:00, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=*file*, \ pri=30629, dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent Setting up a `mail-sink' alias, which traps all outgoing messages this way, may be an easier way to recover the undelivered messages. It fringes on privacy violation, though, so I'm now going to pick one or the other :) - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 02:23:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396AF16A419 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:23:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@magnesium.net) Received: from toxic.magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A41513C455 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:23:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@magnesium.net) Received: by toxic.magnesium.net (Postfix, from userid 1070) id 8388FDA8CE; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:24:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:24:41 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List , KDE at FreeBSD List Message-ID: <20080124022441.GA29323@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21 of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: Subject: mail questions: mutt and KDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:23:22 -0000 People, Here's hopping that I'm still subscribed to the kde list, and that somebody can answer these general mail-type questions. Once I have Kmail working on my own domain, I'll be able to use that as a lifeline. Also, I would like some clues of how to if IF I can use mutt *with* IMAP. Since my network re-org, THOUGHT.ORG is now behind a stand-alone firewall. AFAIK, nothing/nobody, not even me, can crack my f'wall. My server/desktop is not running 3 servers within one jail: DNS, web, and email. Still using sendmail as my MTA, the rest of it is evolution and/or kmail. USing IMAP from my two desktops to the mailserver. I Do not understand much of this yet, do Please bear with me. I want to get mutt functional since most of my mailis ASCII or 8859-15. For friends who mail me URL's of pics, I use the GUI mail user agents. Is there a way me me, on desktops (FBSD and Ubuntu) to send/receive via the mailserver? The Kmail question is a bit on the strange side. When I hit the "reply" icon, a composer window pops up, but I cannot type in it! There is no echo to stdout. But the scroll-bar moves up so I'm guessing that **something** is being stuffed into the the composer buffer. Have any of you guys seen this before? (I recently learned most of the other one, evo, and it does build, but I'm missing its icons... I see tiny squares with red X's inside. But this is another issue. For now, I'd be happy with some clues about the Kmail strangeness and the mutt+IMAP stuff.) tia, guys, gary -- Gary Kline Seattle BSD Users' Group (seabug) | kline@magnesium.net Thought Unlimited Org's Alternate Email Site http://www.magnesium.net/~kline To live is not a necessity; but to live honorably...is a necessity. -Kant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 02:28:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE93B16A417 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:28:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D8E13C467 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:28:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id m0O2S5Dn052467; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:28:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Paul Schmehl" , Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:29:37 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <6453DAA1532FE742E7057C08@utd59514.utdallas.edu> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:28:06 -0800 (PST) Cc: Subject: RE: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 02:28:08 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Paul Schmehl > Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2008 10:08 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: are we CRIMINALS? > > > --On Tuesday, January 22, 2008 21:57:22 -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt > wrote: > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Paul Schmehl > >> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 10:25 AM > >> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >> Subject: Re: are we CRIMINALS? > >> > >> > >> --On Tuesday, January 22, 2008 13:03:27 +0100 Wojciech Puchar > >> wrote: > >> > >> > http://www.spamsuite.com/node/351 > >> > > >> > jest first step to criminalize unix at all > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > >> We aren't criminals, but *he* is. > >> > > > > Paul, you do realize that Sierra is a known newsgroup spammer and > > that the lawsuit in question was just filed against a spamfighter > > by a spammer? > > > > Yes. > > > Also, that the "judgement" that is in the post is actually > > a prepared order, written by Plaintiff's counsel, it wasn't > > written by the judge. > > > > Yes. > > > This case is sitting in the appellate courts somewhere, gathering > > dust. Nobody has paid anything to anybody, except to the lawyers. > > Sierra makes their money selling to morons what Google gives > > out for free. > > > > Please, unless your willing to do the research, don't waste > > time commenting. > > > > He disobeyed a court order. That makes him a criminal. Only if the court in question has jurisdiction over him. The US courts found in favor of an anti-trust lawsuit against DeBeers around 20 years ago I think it was and the DeBeers family finally decided it was too much of a nuisance to avoid travelling into the US so they settled for some paltry 300 million this year (if you have ever bought a diamond and you still have the receipt you can get some settlement money) Did the US court have jurisdiction over a corporation that has no footprint in the US? They thought they did. DeBeers didn't. What do you think? How would you like it if some kangaroo court in Iran issued a judgement against you? Would you consider yourself a criminal? > Whether > what he was > trying to do was "right" or not is irrelevant. Absolutely untrue. It is at the heart of the issue. Once the court > told him to > stop, he should have stopped. > No. Once ALL AVENUES of appeal are exhausted AND a judgement was found against him, only then if he disobeys the final court order then can he be considered a criminal. As such happened with Microsoft during the anti-trust trial, etc. Until then, this is nothing more than a civil dispute between a spamfighter and a spammer. And as the spamfigher in question undoubtedly has no assets to his name, what is really going on here is a complicated political dance whereby the spammer is manipulating the courts in an attempt to bluster a threat against the spamfighter, and the spamfighter is manipulating the courts in an attempt to cost the spammer money in lawyer fees. A great many of these suits disappear when one or the other of the parties gets tired of paying the court costs and lawyers fees. > And yes, I know full well that bad people take advantage of our > courts every > day. > And good people often forget that courts are nothing more than another arm of the government, and quite often the solutions that come out of them are a result of political negotiation and compromise - exactly the same way that the legislative arm solves problems. You should read some history, there's been a lot of bad law that has been overturned. It never would have happened if people like Rosa Parks hadn't "committed criminal acts" from your viewpoint, and ignored court-supported orders and laws. You cannot sit there and say that just because someone is a criminal they are bad. Nor can you say that just because someone is not a criminal that they are good. Look no further than the current occupant of the White House for that. What is criminal in a good society is defined by what is "wrong" Sadly, that does not always happen. If you buy a DVD and make a copy for your own use according to DMCA you are a criminal. However if you buy a videotape of the same movie and make a copy for your own use you are not a criminal. Clearly, both actions are morally "right" They are almost the same action in fact. But one is illegal the other isn't. Can't you see here that the problem isn't the action but the law? In this lawsuit, the worst you can say is that both parties, the spammer and the spamfighter, are in the wrong. But I fail to see how the spammer can be "right" and the spamfighter is "wrong" You can, if you wish, argue the spammer is "legal" and the spamfigher is "illegal" But, this simply illustrates that the law is bad - and for many people it is a moral duty to violate bad law. And I for one, am very glad that they feel this way. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 03:07:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DCFD16A419 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:07:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-out.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D7E13C447 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:07:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-av-04.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-02.forthnet.gr (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m0O37Vrv020860; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:07:31 +0200 Received: from MX-IN-04.forthnet.gr (mx-in-04.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.163]) by mx-av-04.forthnet.gr (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0O37VNI032001; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:07:31 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (ppp133-151.adsl.forthnet.gr [62.1.124.151]) by MX-IN-04.forthnet.gr (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0O37TwB013722; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:07:29 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-04.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-04.forthnet.gr header.from=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; sender-id=neutral Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0O37Sie011039; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:07:28 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m0O37QQ2011038; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:07:26 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:07:26 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20080124030725.GA10855@kobe.laptop> References: <20080124022441.GA29323@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080124022441.GA29323@thought.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Using mutt to access imap folders (was: mail questions: mutt and KDE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:07:34 -0000 freebsd-kde stripped from the recipient list. Gary it's probably better to post *two* messages if you have two unrelated questions. This way the traffic in freebsd-kde will not get 'polluted' with all the replies about mutt, which isn't really related to KDE on FreeBSD. On 2008-01-23 18:24, Gary Kline wrote: > Here's hopping that I'm still subscribed to the kde list, and that > somebody can answer these general mail-type questions. You don't have to be subscribed to freebsd-kde to post. > Also, I would like some clues of how to if IF I can use mutt *with* > IMAP. You can set ${MAIL} in your environment to an imap folder. Then firing up mutt will select the imap folder by default, and you will be prompted for a password. Try for example the following: $ MAIL='imap://username@imapserver/INBOX' You can store the IMAP username and password in ~/.muttrc too, but then you should pay careful attention to the permissions of the file (even in an internal network, it never hurts to be a bit cautious). The following in your ~/.muttrc should do the trick: set imap_user='gkeramidas' set imap_pass='achmed!the!terrorist' Then fire up mutt, and enjoy your new IMAP session. One word of caution though. Setting $MAIL to an IMAP folder path in your default environment may upset programs which don't really speak IMAP the way mutt does, i.e. the command-line mail(1) utility. The manual of mutt, which is accessible by hitting while inside mutt, is also a valuable resource for this sort of questions. Specifically, the following section includes a very good example of how you can handle multiple IMAP accounts in a single mutt session: | 13. Managing multiple IMAP/POP accounts (OPTIONAL) | | If you happen to have accounts on multiple IMAP and/or POP | servers, you may find managing all the authentication settings | inconvenient and error-prone. The account-hook command may | help. This hook works like folder-hook but is invoked whenever | you access a remote mailbox (including inside the folder | browser), not just when you open the mailbox. | | Some examples: | | account-hook . 'unset imap_user; unset imap_pass; unset tunnel' | account-hook imap://host1/ 'set imap_user=me1 imap_pass=foo' | account-hook imap://host2/ 'set tunnel="ssh host2 /usr/libexec/imapd"' There are *many* other details in the manual about using mutt to access IMAP folders. You should definitely skim through the text at least once in case you find some interesting option. A text version of the full manual is available in /usr/local too: /usr/local/share/doc/mutt/manual.txt This is, actually, the file that you get to read when you hit inside mutt. - Giorgos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 03:32:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F38216A418 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:32:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailman.msc@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD2F13C448 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:32:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailman.msc@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so115258waf.3 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:32:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=T5DK0KtUunJxmuLGiO0Pxz4Fmgpk7MQwDCKqjrDeH+E=; b=PYjJKTi902u90v1Ya7a3JJhs6u8L92dhypsp7ROXvwU0T1b318aewBu/FUTjR1ZaKBebTsbrGzusfM0w/kTgfQF5GJNtbTykuXHIpjnJzrkq0e9qApvDelWtfzgYN/IP7PRjD+nK8ulfnWFRYCkJQAjC9m/TuwNfDVXLNELRZag= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=vJLecDgnEFmhVFDZ4Pgw9Jvy1e7lZfIQpXe3r+KTPTsNyEZFQz/Hv7+VDrqbi/yZsVzEqszfI/olkXAlYW94is494YDTCSvcaDqGgSu0+Bvo+eIIfCqusL+kpi/u8kwf+W1Jss6ZbEmvUlBoEcbjFOXnz3pUmVggKdw650044SU= Received: by 10.114.176.1 with SMTP id y1mr177309wae.86.1201145574744; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:32:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.110.4 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 19:32:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:32:54 +0800 From: "Anjang Aki" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Out of range IP address in /var/log/messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:32:55 -0000 Hello, i have never added IP 213.112.194.33 in my rc.conf and the log keep generated the error every hours fyi, my network start from 213.112.194.34 to 213.112.194.62 it causes my cpu utilization turning upside down from 90% idle to 0% easily and making the logfile getting its size bigger other than /etc/rc.conf, where else should i checked if there's any entry of this IP address? i'm using FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE what could be the possibilities and how can I fix this issue? any advice and solution are highly appreciated thank you in advanced -------------------------------- messages log: [root@freebsdsrv /var/log]# cat messages Jan 20 16:59:50 freebsdsrv kernel: arplookup 213.112.194.33 failed: host is not on local network Jan 20 17:00:50 freebsdsrv kernel: arplookup 213.112.194.33 failed: host is not on local network Jan 20 17:00:50 freebsdsrv last message repeated 27 times Jan 20 17:15:50 freebsdsrv kernel: arplookup 213.112.194.33 failed: host is not on local network Jan 20 17:16:50 freebsdsrv kernel: arplookup 213.112.194.33 failed: host is not on local network Jan 20 17:16:50 freebsdsrv last message repeated 27 times Jan 20 17:31:50 freebsdsrv kernel: arplookup 213.112.194.33 failed: host is not on local network Jan 20 17:32:50 freebsdsrv last message repeated 28 times Jan 20 17:40:31 freebsdsrv kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 208 to 200 packets/sec Jan 20 17:40:40 freebsdsrv kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 202 to 200 packets/sec Jan 20 17:47:50 freebsdsrv kernel: arplookup 213.112.194.33 failed: host is not on local network Jan 20 17:48:50 freebsdsrv kernel: arplookup 213.112.194.33 failed: host is not on local network Jan 20 17:48:50 freebsdsrv last message repeated 27 times Jan 20 18:03:50 freebsdsrv kernel: arplookup 213.112.194.33 failed: host is not on local network Jan 20 18:04:50 freebsdsrv last message repeated 28 times [root@freebsdsrv /var/log]# -- -- Anjang Aki -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 03:37:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5240916A417 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:37:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-out-01.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AD113C44B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:37:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-av-01.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-01.forthnet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0O3bbQR006466; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:37:37 +0200 Received: from MX-IN-04.forthnet.gr (mx-in-04.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.163]) by mx-av-01.forthnet.gr (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0O3bbn1007210; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:37:37 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (ppp133-151.adsl.forthnet.gr [62.1.124.151]) by MX-IN-04.forthnet.gr (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0O3baGY011603; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:37:37 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-04.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-04.forthnet.gr header.from=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; sender-id=neutral Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0O3baXC012521; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:37:36 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m0O3bYtZ012520; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:37:34 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:37:34 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Anjang Aki Message-ID: <20080124033734.GB12442@kobe.laptop> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Out of range IP address in /var/log/messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:37:40 -0000 On 2008-01-24 11:32, Anjang Aki wrote: > Hello, > i have never added IP 213.112.194.33 in my rc.conf and the log keep > generated the error every hours > > fyi, my network start from 213.112.194.34 to 213.112.194.62 > it causes my cpu utilization turning upside down from 90% idle to 0% > easily and making the logfile getting its size bigger > > other than /etc/rc.conf, where else should i checked if there's any > entry of this IP address? > messages log: > [root@freebsdsrv /var/log]# cat messages > Jan 20 16:59:50 freebsdsrv kernel: arplookup 213.112.194.33 failed: host is not on local network > Jan 20 17:00:50 freebsdsrv kernel: arplookup 213.112.194.33 failed: host is not on local network > Jan 20 17:00:50 freebsdsrv last message repeated 27 times It would help if you could show us your `ifconfig -a' output. This way we will know what IP address *and* netmask you are using. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 03:52:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18CB16A417 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:52:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob89@bobj.org) Received: from eastrmmtao107.cox.net (eastrmmtao107.cox.net [68.230.240.59]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1E0413C448 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:52:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob89@bobj.org) Received: from eastrmimpo02.cox.net ([68.1.16.120]) by eastrmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20080124035231.KGZM8815.eastrmmtao107.cox.net@eastrmimpo02.cox.net> for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:52:31 -0500 Received: from mail.bobj.org ([70.185.102.217]) by eastrmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id grrl1Y0014hS3Ka0000000; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:51:45 -0500 Received: from dhcp3.wb4jcm.org (dhcp3.wb4jcm.org [192.168.132.63]) (AUTH: PLAIN bobj, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by mail.bobj.org with esmtp; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:52:29 -0500 From: Bob Johnson To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:25:11 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801232225.12308.bob89@bobj.org> Cc: Subject: mkisofs and timestamps in ISO-9660 filesystems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:52:32 -0000 I posted this a few days ago and got only marginally helpful responses, so= =20 here it is again with more detail: 1) I'm using reasonably recent versions of things: # uname -a =46reeBSD acer.wb4jcm.org 7.0-RC1 FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 #0: Mon Dec 24 10:10:07 U= TC=20 2007 root@driscoll.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 # mkisofs -version mkisofs 2.01.01a37 (amd64-unknown-freebsd7.0) Copyright (C) 1993-1997 Eric= =20 Youngdale (C) 1997-2007 J=F6rg Schilling # pkg_info | grep cdrtools cdrtools-devel-2.01.01a37,1 CD/DVD and ISO-9660 image creation and extracti= on=20 tools 2) My system is set to US Eastern Standard Time: # date Wed Jan 23 21:45:27 EST 2008 # date -u Thu Jan 24 02:45:49 UTC 2008 # TZ=3DEST date Wed Jan 23 21:46:53 EST 2008 # TZ=3DGMT date Thu Jan 24 02:46:58 GMT 2008 # echo $TZ #=20 This is a dual boot system (with MS Vista), so the hardware clock is set to= =20 local time, not to GMT. I suspect this is significant. 3) I have a test file (just a bunch of zeroes). It's big because I wanted t= o=20 see how quickly this system could write out a GB of data, but I get the sam= e=20 results with small files). The time stamp displayed by "ls" is correct for= =20 local time, and shows correct GMT time if I ask for it: # ls -l total 1049104 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 root bobj 1073741824 Jan 23 21:28 test.file <--CORRECT # TZ=3DGMT ls -l total 1049104 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 root bobj 1073741824 Jan 24 02:28 test.file <--CORRECT # =20 4) I use mkisofs to create an ISO filesystem with this test file in it: # mkisofs -R -J -o test.iso test.file 0.95% done, estimate finish Wed Jan 23 21:55:59 2008 [...] 99.15% done, estimate finish Wed Jan 23 21:54:46 2008 Total translation table size: 0 Total rockridge attributes bytes: 274 Total directory bytes: 0 Path table size(bytes): 10 Max brk space used 0 524469 extents written (1024 MB) 5) I use mdconfig to mount the ISO filesystem (I get the same results if I = use=20 burncd to burn a CD and then mount the CD): # mdconfig -a -t vnode -f test.iso -u 4 # mount_cd9660 /dev/md4 /mnt # =20 6) Now when I look at the dates on the ISO filesystem, they are wrong. They= =20 look like the correction for offset from GMT has been applied twice. Note=20 that the correct local timestamp for the file on the ISO filesystem is Jan= =20 23 21:28 and the correct GMT timestamp is Jan 24 02:28. # ls -l /mnt total 1048576 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 root bobj 1073741824 Jan 23 16:28 test.file <-- WRONG! # TZ=3DEST ls -l /mnt total 1048576 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 root bobj 1073741824 Jan 23 16:28 test.file <-- WRONG! # TZ=3DGMT ls -l /mnt total 1048576 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 root bobj 1073741824 Jan 23 21:28 test.file <-- WRONG! # # ls -lc /mnt total 1048576 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 root bobj 1073741824 Jan 23 16:28 test.file <-- WRONG! # ls -lt /mnt total 1048576 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 root bobj 1073741824 Jan 23 16:28 test.file <-- WRONG! # ls -lu /mnt total 1048576 =2Drw-r--r-- 1 root bobj 1073741824 Jan 23 16:37 test.file <-- WRONG! # =20 So what is going on here? Is this a bug, or a misconfiguration, or a=20 misunderstanding?=20 And as a side issue, why is the incorrect last access time 16:37, rather th= an=20 16:54, since I built the ISO filesystem at 21:54? I have not yet tried moving a CD to a Windows system to see what the file=20 timestamp shows there. I have tried this on two different FreeBSD systems=20 (7.0-RC1 amd64, and 6.2-RELEASE-p9 i386) with both cdrtools and=20 cdrtools-devel from ports, and get the same results. =2D Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 04:10:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D9B916A419 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:10:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailman.msc@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128D713C45A for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:10:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailman.msc@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so132846waf.3 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:10:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=OL6j1nskKi1jZfRVfWZfSCniv0uuhhsJ12XjSiHPpXs=; b=ruN+erwadiP15Wy7Xak36o3f550A3Wdunmva5GTbxAlC+sbbBvNG5T2QBHbd7sx9MdeHZMGziMrY+/lb2GA60lIvshXpPNBMpRAEUmZGhOxwkw+rSe7HQ2cfjvsTDirpP5QjYoFrgAm2awgjGmAsejiFEf0W+0I+hIMOcTf9Yj4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XPJrGtjmOCXVfX0tLsa3TfsGoK95o78NpM9QFjDRbxsV+YHqB6PEymT0VrGrBcyKBnldeB9imhFeE9+pOSxiR/oIOCGHTmAsCchjW6t2B3zqRCHGbvdG14g8lXFGtTT7oV0BhD3T9BtJSnW8eKuVuQWUKS0IAYaycSFIpBs34H8= Received: by 10.114.169.2 with SMTP id r2mr237629wae.30.1201147858219; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:10:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.110.4 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:10:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:10:58 +0800 From: "Anjang Aki" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080124033734.GB12442@kobe.laptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080124033734.GB12442@kobe.laptop> Cc: mailman.msc@gmail.com Subject: Re: Out of range IP address in /var/log/messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:10:59 -0000 Thank you for your reply. Here is ifconfig -a output: [root@freebsdsrv] ~ $ ifconfig -a fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=b inet 213.112.195.98 netmask 0xffffffe0 broadcast 213.112.195.127 inet 213.112.194.34 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.35 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.36 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.37 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.38 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.39 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.40 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.41 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.42 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.43 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.44 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.45 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.46 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.47 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.48 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.49 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.50 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.51 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.52 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.53 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.54 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.55 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.56 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.57 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.58 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.59 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.60 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.61 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.194.62 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 inet 213.112.195.99 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.100 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.101 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.102 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.103 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.104 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.105 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.106 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.107 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.108 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.109 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.110 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.111 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.112 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.113 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.114 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.115 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.116 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.117 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.118 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.119 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.120 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.121 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.122 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.123 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.124 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.125 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 inet 213.112.195.126 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.195.255 ether 00:15:e9:b5:25:d6 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active pfsync0: flags=0<> mtu 2020 syncpeer: 224.0.0.240 maxupd: 128 pflog0: flags=0<> mtu 33208 lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 [root@freebsdsrv] ~ $ Usable IP range: 213.112.195.98 - 213.112.195.126 and 213.112.194.34 - 213.112.194.62 Regards, On Jan 24, 2008 11:37 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2008-01-24 11:32, Anjang Aki wrote: > > Hello, > > i have never added IP 213.112.194.33 in my rc.conf and the log keep > > generated the error every hours > > > > fyi, my network start from 213.112.194.34 to 213.112.194.62 > > it causes my cpu utilization turning upside down from 90% idle to 0% > > easily and making the logfile getting its size bigger > > > > other than /etc/rc.conf, where else should i checked if there's any > > entry of this IP address? > > > messages log: > > [root@freebsdsrv /var/log]# cat messages > > Jan 20 16:59:50 freebsdsrv kernel: arplookup 213.112.194.33 failed: host is not on local network > > Jan 20 17:00:50 freebsdsrv kernel: arplookup 213.112.194.33 failed: host is not on local network > > Jan 20 17:00:50 freebsdsrv last message repeated 27 times > > It would help if you could show us your `ifconfig -a' output. This way > we will know what IP address *and* netmask you are using. > > -- -- Anjang Aki -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 04:41:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7276516A41A for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:41:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from smtp3.utdallas.edu (smtp3.utdallas.edu [129.110.10.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5276913C467 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:41:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauls@utdallas.edu) Received: from [192.168.2.101] (unknown [24.175.90.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp3.utdallas.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC3C65502 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:41:31 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:41:12 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: RE: are we CRIMINALS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:41:32 -0000 --On Wednesday, January 23, 2008 6:29 PM -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >> He disobeyed a court order. That makes him a criminal. > > Only if the court in question has jurisdiction over him. The US > courts found in favor of an anti-trust lawsuit against DeBeers > around 20 years ago I think it was and the DeBeers family finally > decided it was too much of a nuisance to avoid travelling into the US > so they settled for some paltry 300 million this year (if you have > ever bought a diamond and you still have the receipt you can > get some settlement money) > > Did the US court have jurisdiction over a corporation that has no > footprint in the US? They thought they did. DeBeers didn't. What > do you think? > Doesn't matter. In the US, they were in violation of the law. > How would you like it if some kangaroo court in Iran issued a judgement > against you? Would you consider yourself a criminal? > In Iran? Yes. >> Whether >> what he was >> trying to do was "right" or not is irrelevant. > > Absolutely untrue. It is at the heart of the issue. > Absolutely not. Right or wrong is irrelevant in a court of law. > Once the court >> told him to >> stop, he should have stopped. >> > > No. Once ALL AVENUES of appeal are exhausted AND a judgement was > found against him, only then if he disobeys the final court order > then can he be considered a criminal. If you get a TRO *during* a trial, and you violate the terms of the TRO, then you are a criminal by definition. The outcome of the case is irrelevant. > > And good people often forget that courts are nothing more than another > arm of the government, and quite often the solutions that come out > of them are a result of political negotiation and compromise - exactly > the same way that the legislative arm solves problems. > They *should* never be. > You should read some history, there's been a lot of bad law that > has been overturned. It never would have happened if people like > Rosa Parks hadn't "committed criminal acts" from your viewpoint, > and ignored court-supported orders and laws. > I totally agree, however, Rosa Parks *did* violate the law and *was* a criminal by definition. > You cannot sit there and say that just because someone is a > criminal they are bad. I never said anything about bad. It isn't a moral judgement. It's a legal one. Nor can you say that just because someone > is not a criminal that they are good. Look no further than the > current occupant of the White House for that. What is criminal > in a good society is defined by what is "wrong" No, what is criminal in a good society is when you violate the law. Whether or not the law is "good" is irrelevant. Sadly, that > does not always happen. > > If you buy a DVD and make a copy for your own use according to > DMCA you are a criminal. However if you buy a videotape of the > same movie and make a copy for your own use you are not a criminal. > Clearly, both actions are morally "right" They are almost the same > action in fact. But one is illegal the other isn't. Can't you > see here that the problem isn't the action but the law? > Of course, however, if you copy the DVD you have violated the law and by definition you are a criminal. Now, you may decide your actions are right, but you need to do that with the full knowledge that you *could* be found in violation of the law and you *could* go to jail. To violate the law and then whine that it's unfair is childish. > In this lawsuit, the worst you can say is that both parties, > the spammer and the spamfighter, are in the wrong. But I fail to > see how the spammer can be "right" and the spamfighter is "wrong" > Didn't say he was wrong. Just in violation of the law. > You can, if you wish, argue the spammer is "legal" and the > spamfigher is "illegal" But, this simply illustrates that the > law is bad - and for many people it is a moral duty to violate > bad law. And I for one, am very glad that they feel this way. > Again, there's absolutely nothing wrong with that *so long as* you are fully willing to suffer the consequences. As with Rosa Parks, you may succeed in illustrating how unfair the law is and getting it changed, but you won't do it without paying a personal price. Ignorance of the law is no excuse. Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) Senior Information Security Analyst The University of Texas at Dallas http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 05:26:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DD016A420 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:26:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cristian.salan@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09AD13C45B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:26:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cristian.salan@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so97572fgg.35 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:26:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=oCW8tV32D9e6R9jqjAGSGPF+aow9b//eawYSlwIm7uc=; b=s4NwhfjEq3Ue++sOqt8gBQh3uQ1LSE3dviIoQ9oAatz78XUTDlOLrowvpBM+NAt34fRQwlRchiF/5xacf2JYd7QrnAyJPIMHy/GBNWga/UKfaAShjP0XU4T2aN90IT/w+TyyHDbxLP37fG1rRoPDXHmt72OzxxRyKUbQHXtfUOA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=EiJwZfu30fNL7afLOiyr95QBbq6RUw1s45JzNYvGthJaVmnkGq84YXPBYwQ+KRKt03blJ7PCV0MPcInVWA1dLyF8fz2/gJ9hMoNgMb+FWvVkrPqnl2sw5f0CZeRTarii4XNmX9ptzdpt4KI05Y41Ax2J3EC0NyJKDkPvupHXIFU= Received: by 10.78.173.20 with SMTP id v20mr124326hue.12.1201150799547; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:59:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.147.17 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:59:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <809d83890801232059i68492a69n883d2ac124013a3d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:59:59 +0200 From: "Cristian Salan" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Doubled files or directories on samba. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:26:43 -0000 Hello, I have some strange behavior with some files and some directories being doubled on samba. When checking on freebsd file system all is OK. Mounting partitions on windows clients or connecting with smbclient would show some doubled files or directories. I mean the same file appear twice. When deleting one from windows both disappear but copying back the file from backup, again I have 2 files with the same name. smb: \> ls DATA\RON\E* EURO.XG0 A 4096 Wed Jan 23 14:58:44 2008 EURO.XG0 A 4096 Wed Jan 23 14:58:44 2008 First I've upgraded samba to the latest port version (samba-3.0.28,1) - no joy. I've made a jail (maybe the ports are messed?) only with samba. Same result. I've source upgraded to 6.3-RELEASE. Nice but didn't solve the problem. The system was stable and I cannot relate any software maintenance with the beginning of this behavior. Any pointers would be appreciated. Cristian Salan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 05:32:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287AF16A418 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:32:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17CEB13C442 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:32:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so89602rvb.43 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:32:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.180.42 with SMTP id c42mr183755rvf.145.1201152740353; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:32:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.100.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i35sm986602wxd.34.2008.01.23.21.32.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 23 Jan 2008 21:32:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from obelix (obelix [192.168.17.13]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD4D1140D for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:31:55 +0400 (GST) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:31:55 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@obelix.home.rakhesh.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4797A321.3050704@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <20080124091334.I14280@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> References: <20080123213405.G8230@asterix.home.rakhesh.com> <4797A321.3050704@FreeBSD.org> X-Blog: http://rakhesh.com/ X-Notes: http://rakhesh.net/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Subject: Re: make buildworld 6.x on 7.x? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:32:21 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is it possible to do a ''make buildworld buildkernel'' of the FreeBSD 6.x >> series sources on a FreeBSD 7.x machine and then install them onto a >> FreeBSD 6.x machine? > > Yes, I did this a few minutes ago in fact :) No special procedures are > necessary, world builds are already suitably isolated from the host system > for this to work. Awesome! Infact, I didn't think it would be possible. Like you have separate port packages for the 6.x and 7.x trees, I thought FreeBSD 6.x compiled on a FreeBSD 7.x system won't run. But I was obviously wrong. Guess its different for the base OS eh ...? Going by the same logic, is it possible that tomm I can download the sources for an OS like say, NetBSD, buildworld for it on my FreeBSD machine, and then install on a NetBSD machine? Thanks, Rakhesh --- http://rakhesh.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 06:28:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B995016A41B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:28:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prabhuh@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD4E13C458 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:28:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prabhuh@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so197361waf.3 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:28:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=78ro4G+8+JhS7VnMdB3ymB8QqZDXe2uONeuWUUZroyM=; b=MzrjPnfDoJHtQQJdnW7bRkmLxoqaAVgHP1S4mul9kp/ogH4eGPdrQ/wZIH3I0fq31iE6eHJp21897jRcuPzDROVJWAO6Hw6YEyqFmvV7TtHtvsOxpJy+tSAcwR55IZqpgWHFlT+mLFv9EUnQBco2/X1ecRcnlP/SZAR1+bDCLcg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=T/XTrtMIPOR9W9i9XHWpKF17wsBnyrkB2w99FxehScnRuYQ3AVocyVZE5cjBlZuBdTjo82tV0m+2aVjEO36higeKvXTASjF3sDGmDOU18q2VePLDrD9Plwj8BT5V71duTlv2DwxijvcTG/ao5ohkbfNQGaRUNTrfvQQ7FsCAVmo= Received: by 10.114.25.3 with SMTP id 3mr376000way.22.1201156100260; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:28:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.91.19 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:28:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:58:20 +0530 From: "Prabhu Hariharan" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Unspecified IPv6 Address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:28:20 -0000 Hi, Why certain hosts of freebsd can be configurable with unspecified (::) (all-zero) IPv6 addresses in its interfaces? RFC 4291 clearly mentions "this address must never be assigned to any node". Is there is any use-case or motivation behind accepting this address in an interface? Regards, Prabhu H From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 06:44:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB1816A418 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:44:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (gate6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E2B13C448 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:44:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0O6ikSp081040; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:44:47 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk m0O6ikSp081040 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=200708; t=1201157087; bh=9t93NlA8lP36H+ sjkrhAqBp7Zj2RLqg3xVaX2BHrj2U=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Organization: User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc: Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Mime-Version: References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<479833DE.9030104@infracaninophile. co.uk>|Date:=20Thu,=2024=20Jan=202008=2006:44:46=20+0000|From:=20Ma tthew=20Seaman=20|Organization:=20 Infracaninophile|User-Agent:=20Thunderbird=202.0.0.9=20(X11/2008012 2)|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20Anjang=20Aki=20 |CC:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Out=20of=20ra nge=20IP=20address=20in=20/var/log/messages|References:=20=09<20080124033 734.GB12442@kobe.laptop>=20|In-Reply-To:=20|X-Enigmail-Version:=200.95.0|Content- Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3DISO-8859-1|Content-Transfer-Encod ing:=207bit; b=pUXCu+iPXg/R6AiuAzwt9ypM+rMnEGNOXMlAtecbXTsX/1p1DlD1 P6oyI4grmkJzNXA2yhdp9udwdQQerEl7lrcJNErhskEs3tZKlXWuAI2KEbr1KMFpOVV ii+GeBdn7NF1zE+Pg47IS/EvO1EUpklAFBkG4qxQbI3zdknsmjBY= Message-ID: <479833DE.9030104@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:44:46 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080122) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anjang Aki References: <20080124033734.GB12442@kobe.laptop> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:44:47 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92/5535/Thu Jan 24 04:39:26 2008 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VERIFIED,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.4 (2008-01-01) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Out of range IP address in /var/log/messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:44:53 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Anjang Aki wrote: > Thank you for your reply. > Here is ifconfig -a output: > > [root@freebsdsrv] ~ $ ifconfig -a > fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > options=b > inet 213.112.195.98 netmask 0xffffffe0 broadcast 213.112.195.127 > inet 213.112.194.34 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 ^^^^^^^^^^ Here's the problem > inet 213.112.194.35 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 > inet 213.112.194.36 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 213.112.194.255 [...] > Usable IP range: 213.112.195.98 - 213.112.195.126 and 213.112.194.34 - > 213.112.194.62 You've actually got two disjoint network ranges here: % ipcalc 213.112.194.34/27 Address: 213.112.194.34 11010101.01110000.11000010.001 00010 Netmask: 255.255.255.224 = 27 11111111.11111111.11111111.111 00000 Wildcard: 0.0.0.31 00000000.00000000.00000000.000 11111 => Network: 213.112.194.32/27 11010101.01110000.11000010.001 00000 HostMin: 213.112.194.33 11010101.01110000.11000010.001 00001 HostMax: 213.112.194.62 11010101.01110000.11000010.001 11110 Broadcast: 213.112.194.63 11010101.01110000.11000010.001 11111 Hosts/Net: 30 Class C % ipcalc 213.112.195.98/27 Address: 213.112.195.98 11010101.01110000.11000011.011 00010 Netmask: 255.255.255.224 = 27 11111111.11111111.11111111.111 00000 Wildcard: 0.0.0.31 00000000.00000000.00000000.000 11111 => Network: 213.112.195.96/27 11010101.01110000.11000011.011 00000 HostMin: 213.112.195.97 11010101.01110000.11000011.011 00001 HostMax: 213.112.195.126 11010101.01110000.11000011.011 11110 Broadcast: 213.112.195.127 11010101.01110000.11000011.011 11111 Hosts/Net: 30 Class C The rule with setting up aliases on FreeBSD is that the first address used from any netblock must have the correct netmask for the whole block. Subsequent alias IPs from the same block typically use 0xffffffff as the netmask -- this certainly used to be mandatory but I think that requirement was actually dropped fairly recently. Anyhow, in order to fix your problem, change the netmask for the 194.34 address in your /etc/rc.conf: ifconfig_fxp0_alias0="inet 213.112.194.34 netmask 0xffffffe0" Note: you don't actually need to supply both netmask and broadcast -- broadcast will be calculated for you automatically. You can also give the netmask in 'slash notation' like so: ifconfig fxp0 inet 213.112.194.34/27 alias If this is configured correctly, then you should see routes for both 213.112.194.34/27 and 213.112.195.98/27 in the output of 'netstat -rn' Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHmDPe8Mjk52CukIwRCMe4AJsH64LMk3H3HCXCi4xXbo7gUIBuCACbBGbm I+qdHOSXJcNVHtq4OAbfg0M= =NiOh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 07:55:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7410E16A418 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:55:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Matthias.Apitz@oclc.org) Received: from mail.pica.nl (mail.pica.nl [192.87.44.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FE813C455 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:55:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Matthias.Apitz@oclc.org) Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de ([193.31.10.34]) by mail.pica.nl with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:57:14 +0100 Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m0O7f8h4001809; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:41:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from matthias.apitz@oclc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to matthias.apitz@oclc.org using -f Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:41:08 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Robert Eckardt Message-ID: <20080124074108.GA1485@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <4797917B.4020600@gmail.com> <20080123142316.2d3ef433.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20080123213211.M8757@Robert-Eckardt.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20080123213211.M8757@Robert-Eckardt.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE (i386) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jan 2008 07:57:15.0038 (UTC) FILETIME=[BBC70BE0:01C85E5E] Cc: jackbarnett@gmail.com, Bill Moran , Freebsd questions Subject: Re: VM Options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:55:14 -0000 El día Wednesday, January 23, 2008 a las 10:53:31PM +0100, Robert Eckardt escribió: > > VMWare on FreeBSD is a no-op. Someone should really remove that port. > > That's nonsense. > The current (very old) port is quite out-dated and it took me some time > to get it running right e.g. with VMware 3 on FreeBSD 6.2. But it works! Maybe you could write a small 'howTo' about getting this old port to work with VMware 3 on FreeBSD 6.2? Thx matthias -- Matthias Apitz Manager Technical Support - OCLC GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.oclc.org/ http://www.UnixArea.de/ b http://gurucubano.blogspot.com/ Don't top-post, read RFC1855 http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 07:59:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 093A416A41A for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:59:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Matthias.Apitz@oclc.org) Received: from mail.pica.nl (mail.pica.nl [192.87.44.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959AC13C45A for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Matthias.Apitz@oclc.org) Received: from rebelion.Sisis.de ([193.31.10.34]) by mail.pica.nl with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:01:09 +0100 Received: (from guru@localhost) by rebelion.Sisis.de (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id m0O7x5TY002363; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:59:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from matthias.apitz@oclc.org) Resent-Message-Id: <200801240759.m0O7x5TY002363@rebelion.Sisis.de> X-Authentication-Warning: rebelion.Sisis.de: guru set sender to matthias.apitz@oclc.org using -f Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:41:08 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Robert Eckardt Message-ID: <20080124074108.GA1485@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <4797917B.4020600@gmail.com> <20080123142316.2d3ef433.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20080123213211.M8757@Robert-Eckardt.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20080123213211.M8757@Robert-Eckardt.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE (i386) Resent-From: guru@rebelion.Sisis.de Resent-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:59:05 +0100 Resent-To: Robert Eckardt , Bill Moran , jackbarnett@gmail.com, Freebsd questions X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Jan 2008 08:01:09.0697 (UTC) FILETIME=[47A52B10:01C85E5F] Cc: jackbarnett@gmail.com, Bill Moran , Freebsd questions Subject: Re: VM Options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:59:08 -0000 El día Wednesday, January 23, 2008 a las 10:53:31PM +0100, Robert Eckardt escribió: > > VMWare on FreeBSD is a no-op. Someone should really remove that > > port. > > That's nonsense. > The current (very old) port is quite out-dated and it took me some time > to get it running right e.g. with VMware 3 on FreeBSD 6.2. But it works! Maybe you could write a small 'howTo' about getting this old port to work with VMware 3 on FreeBSD 6.2? Thx matthias -- Matthias Apitz Manager Technical Support - OCLC GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.oclc.org/ http://www.UnixArea.de/ b http://gurucubano.blogspot.com/ Don't top-post, read RFC1855 http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 09:08:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BEC16A420 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:08:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@hst.org.za) Received: from hermes.hst.org.za (onix.hst.org.za [209.203.2.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD57013C448 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:08:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@hst.org.za) Received: from sysadmin.hst.org.za (sysadmin.int.dbn.hst.org.za [10.1.1.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by hermes.hst.org.za (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0O92CB5068052 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:02:12 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from jonathan@hst.org.za) From: Jonathan McKeown Organization: Health Systems Trust To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:16:26 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20080123123511.3177137c@scorpio> <47979341.1000100@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <47979341.1000100@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801241116.26872.jonathan@hst.org.za> X-Spam-Score: -4.376 () ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 209.203.2.133 Subject: Re: Perl-5.10.0 in FBSD-7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:08:43 -0000 On Wednesday 23 January 2008 21:19, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Historically, new versions of perl are a recipe for large amounts of > pain because of all the old perl code that stops working. I haven't used perl 5.10 yet, but looking at the changes (available at ), and in particular the section headed ``incompatible changes'', it looks like a small number of odd corners (for example, chdir FOO - unquoted argument now treated as filehandle not directory name) rather than a wholesale change like perl 5.8, which was binary-incompatible with earlier perls and therefore required any modules using the XS interface to C code to be recompiled. Perl 5.10 does introduce a couple of new operators (defined-or, spelt //, and smart-match, spelt ~~), and a number of enhancements which have to be switched on using the ``feature'' pragma - most of these changes have filtered back from the Perl 6 effort. Jonathan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 09:35:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4D9E16A46B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:35:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jackbarnett@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F06013C4CE for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:35:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jackbarnett@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so261118pyb.10 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:35:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nYSrf5jKbjvcom27j0TGKpZ6zDB8IFSx6PWN4xHkYBk=; b=E0I3Z/t4JV++EkiU2RY0LGFBZwQqF88uU75X5fCMhI8ViZInDs8F8Z0pPNcCQ/9doYpdbUz45DSvy+MoOiNoDc+o4InW8W4m/vEky4rizl/nOI4n7c6tsutaKo8bp4pokvD5JVxntqLCtxc5H07k1OsegkAaiyYVFj85JwX+C5o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RWg8Yfx5f14CeGUix7f6Zn+UxJasDXmiOnswyirfkUvITVGOqzYU0ICa0Mmv7EgsymiSVeIYeBkbgJG7bF0ueVEvG7b5u6nGY8HAfSl60IdTiIw7gSw5G2sX+7sYvaPU3y41OGM3GnoINBTbJGh9vePUML51HPeORSmY6jy4H7I= Received: by 10.35.69.11 with SMTP id w11mr492058pyk.60.1201167340069; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:35:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.17.10? ( [67.190.229.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n44sm1302673pyh.26.2008.01.24.01.35.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:35:39 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47985BEA.60805@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 03:35:38 -0600 From: Jack Barnett User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Eckardt References: <4797917B.4020600@gmail.com> <20080123142316.2d3ef433.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20080123213211.M8757@Robert-Eckardt.de> In-Reply-To: <20080123213211.M8757@Robert-Eckardt.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Bill Moran , Freebsd questions Subject: Re: VM Options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jackbarnett@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:35:41 -0000 Robert Eckardt wrote: > It depends on what you want to do. To clarify, I would like to run Windows XP at least VMWare runs WinXP beautifully - but unfortunately VMWare doesn't well under FreeBSD. Last time I tried Qemu it was fairly slow. So Jail, Qemu and VMWare crossed off the list, any other options? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 09:42:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 093CF16A417 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:42:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5D0C13C474 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:42:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so85753wxd.7 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:42:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.115.17 with SMTP id n17mr312904wxc.17.1201167746017; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:42:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.100.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h40sm1027282wxd.36.2008.01.24.01.42.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:42:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from obelix (obelix [192.168.17.13]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D1E1140D for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:42:19 +0400 (GST) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:42:19 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@obelix.home.rakhesh.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080124133117.N16149@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> X-Blog: http://rakhesh.com/ X-Notes: http://rakhesh.net/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Subject: CARP and FreeBSD 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:42:27 -0000 Hi, I have two machines. Each have two interfaces, xl0 and fxp0. And each have two carp interfaces -- carp1 (xl0 of both) and carp2 (fxp0 of both). One of the machines is master, the other is backup. I also have the following sysctl set: net.inet.carp.preempt -> 1 My understanding is that if I down one of the interfaces on the master machine (say ''ifconfig xl0 down''), then both carp interfaces on the master will be marked as down. And the backup will become the new master. Later, when the interface is marked up (''ifconfig xl0 up''), the old master will resume control. This is my understanding and that's how things were till yesterday (when I was on FreeBSD 6.2/i386 with both machines). Today morning I upgraded both machines to FreeBSD 6.3 and that does not seem to be the case any more. Now, on the master machine when I down the xl0 interface, only carp1 (the group containing xl0) goes into init state (and the other machine's carp1 interface becomes the new master). Ditto for fxp0 and carp2. So in essence, the net.inet.carp.preempt=1 sysctl does not seem to be working as expected which is unlike how things were in FreeBSD 6.2. Has something changed with regards to carp between FreeBSD 6.2 and 6.3? Any one else encountering a similar problem? Thanks, Rakhesh --- http://rakhesh.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 09:54:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6961016A418 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:54:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.grenier@healthgrid.org) Received: from kimsu.bapt.name (ks37264.kimsufi.com [91.121.4.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D81513C45A for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:54:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.grenier@healthgrid.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [193.48.91.205]) by kimsu.bapt.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D0913615; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:11:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:31:35 +0100 From: Baptiste Grenier To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20080124093135.GA35474@healthgrid.org> References: <20080124022441.GA29323@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080124022441.GA29323@thought.org> Organization: HealthGrid.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Mutt and IMAP, evo and icons (was: mail questions: mutt and KDE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Baptiste Grenier List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:54:51 -0000 --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 24/01/08 =E0 03:06, Gary Kline t=E9l=E9scripta : > People, Hi, > (...) > I want to get mutt functional since most of my mailis ASCII or 8859-15. = For=20 > friends who mail me URL's of pics, I use the GUI mail user agents. Is = there=20 > a way me me, on desktops (FBSD and Ubuntu) to send/receive via the mails= erver? > (...) > (I recently learned most of the other one, evo, and it does build, but I= 'm=20 > missing its icons... I see tiny squares with red X's inside. But this= is > another issue. For now, I'd be happy with some clues about the Kmail str= angeness > and the mutt+IMAP stuff.) Foolowing the advices of Girogos, you should be able to use mutt with imap, I do, and it works quite well, the thing that I miss is the abilitty to view the number of new mail an imap folder has when swithching between folders using 'c' . Does anybody be able to do this ? Here are the relevant parts of my conf (I access a TLS/SSL protected dovecot server): # TLS set ssl_starttls # Don't wait to enter mailbox manually unset imap_passive # Management of multiple imap accounts account-hook . 'unset imap_user; unset imap_pass' # plop.org imaps account-hook imaps://imap.plop.org/ 'set imap_user=3Dbaptiste imap_pass=3D"= XXXXXXXXXX"' account-hook imaps://imap.plop.org/ 'set spoolfile=3Dimaps://imap.plop.org/= INBOX' account-hook imaps://imap.plop.org/ 'set folder=3Dimaps://imap.plop.org/INB= OX' account-hook imaps://imap.plop.org/ 'set mbox=3Dimaps://imap.plop.org/INBOX' account-hook imaps://imap.plop.org/ 'set record=3Dimaps://imap.plop.org/INB= OX.Sent' account-hook imaps://imap.plop.org/ 'set postponed=3Dimaps://imap.plop.org/= INBOX.Postponed' account-hook imaps://imap.plop.org/ 'save-hook . +' I start mutt like this: mutt -f imaps://imap.plop.org For the problem with the evolution icons, it's that you need to launch gnome-settings-daemon (it needs a dbus session too). In my xinitrc, I have this: if which dbus-launch >/dev/null && test -z "$DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS"; then eval `dbus-launch --sh-syntax --exit-with-session` fi /usr/local/libexec/gnome-settings-daemon & > tia, guys, > gary HTH, Baptiste --=20 Baptiste Grenier | PGP: 0x069112E2 HealthGrid SysAdmin http://healthgrid.org/ --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHmFr1LLKEaQaREuIRAh5RAKCDJbacafhBk8txJF0zoG3l2Ver6gCfWCXN uWESpXrAPAEczAJp8pnyJSA= =m4GL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 11:09:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E98C16A41A for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:09:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EC313C458; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:09:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <479871F8.9070305@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:09:44 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jonathan McKeown References: <20080123123511.3177137c@scorpio> <47979341.1000100@FreeBSD.org> <200801241116.26872.jonathan@hst.org.za> In-Reply-To: <200801241116.26872.jonathan@hst.org.za> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perl-5.10.0 in FBSD-7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:09:49 -0000 Jonathan McKeown wrote: > On Wednesday 23 January 2008 21:19, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> Historically, new versions of perl are a recipe for large amounts of >> pain because of all the old perl code that stops working. > > I haven't used perl 5.10 yet, but looking at the changes (available at > ), and in > particular the section headed ``incompatible changes'', it looks like a small > number of odd corners (for example, chdir FOO - unquoted argument now treated > as filehandle not directory name) rather than a wholesale change like perl > 5.8, which was binary-incompatible with earlier perls and therefore required > any modules using the XS interface to C code to be recompiled. > > Perl 5.10 does introduce a couple of new operators (defined-or, spelt //, and > smart-match, spelt ~~), and a number of enhancements which have to be > switched on using the ``feature'' pragma - most of these changes have > filtered back from the Perl 6 effort. Time will tell ;-) A single failure deep in the ports tree is enough to ruin the day of thousands of users. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 11:54:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CDD516A469 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:54:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (mp.cs.niu.edu [131.156.145.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511DD13C4F6 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:54:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (bennett@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp.cs.niu.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0OArFiO023287; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:53:15 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:53:14 -0600 (CST) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <200801241053.m0OArEYs023286@mp.cs.niu.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Paul Schmehl Cc: Mittelstaedt@cs.niu.edu, Ted@cs.niu.edu, tedm@toybox.placo.com Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 200, Issue 60 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:54:11 -0000 On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 22:41:12 -0600 Paul Schmehl wrote: >Message-ID: >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > >--On Wednesday, January 23, 2008 6:29 PM -0800 Ted Mittelstaedt > wrote: >> >>> He disobeyed a court order. That makes him a criminal. >> >> Only if the court in question has jurisdiction over him. The US >> courts found in favor of an anti-trust lawsuit against DeBeers >> around 20 years ago I think it was and the DeBeers family finally >> decided it was too much of a nuisance to avoid travelling into the US >> so they settled for some paltry 300 million this year (if you have >> ever bought a diamond and you still have the receipt you can >> get some settlement money) >> >> Did the US court have jurisdiction over a corporation that has no >> footprint in the US? They thought they did. DeBeers didn't. What >> do you think? >> > >Doesn't matter. In the US, they were in violation of the law. It is important to keep in mind from the outset here that the Supremes have ruled in the past that a statute that is repugnant to the Constitution cannot be law and that no person can be obligated to obey it. > >> How would you like it if some kangaroo court in Iran issued a judgement >> against you? Would you consider yourself a criminal? >> > >In Iran? Yes. > >>> Whether >>> what he was >>> trying to do was "right" or not is irrelevant. >> >> Absolutely untrue. It is at the heart of the issue. >> > >Absolutely not. Right or wrong is irrelevant in a court of law. > >> Once the court >>> told him to >>> stop, he should have stopped. >>> >> >> No. Once ALL AVENUES of appeal are exhausted AND a judgement was >> found against him, only then if he disobeys the final court order >> then can he be considered a criminal. Even then, isn't it necessary for the court to charge the violator with criminal contempt of court first, then to schedule and hold a trial on the contempt charge? > >If you get a TRO *during* a trial, and you violate the terms of the TRO, >then you are a criminal by definition. The outcome of the case is >irrelevant. >> >> And good people often forget that courts are nothing more than another >> arm of the government, and quite often the solutions that come out >> of them are a result of political negotiation and compromise - exactly >> the same way that the legislative arm solves problems. >> > >They *should* never be. That is certainly true, but history bears many examples that diverge from the ideal world in this regard. We can see in the present day that the courts at all levels have been upholding the trampling of constitutional limitations upon the powers of both the legislative and executive branches. Even when they rule against those excesses, they often do so in a way that is designed to increase the reach and power of the judicial branch itself. > >> You should read some history, there's been a lot of bad law that >> has been overturned. It never would have happened if people like >> Rosa Parks hadn't "committed criminal acts" from your viewpoint, >> and ignored court-supported orders and laws. >> > >I totally agree, however, Rosa Parks *did* violate the law and *was* a >criminal by definition. > >> You cannot sit there and say that just because someone is a >> criminal they are bad. > >I never said anything about bad. It isn't a moral judgement. It's a legal >one. > > Nor can you say that just because someone >> is not a criminal that they are good. Look no further than the >> current occupant of the White House for that. What is criminal >> in a good society is defined by what is "wrong" > >No, what is criminal in a good society is when you violate the law. >Whether or not the law is "good" is irrelevant. > However, in the English legal tradition and its descendants, one must either plead guilty to a crime or be convicted of a crime to be a criminal. Note that in the U.S. criminal trials are required by the Constitution to be conducted by a jury of peers, thus preserving a tradition going back at least 1500 years. (It is likely much older, but the Saxons had no written language at the time they brought trial by peers with them to the shores of Anglalond, which makes it difficult or impossible to trace back much further.) The courts routinely ignore this constitutional requirement by conducting what are referred to as "bench trials", wherein the judge decides upon the guilt or lack thereof of the defendant(s), but that is an discussion for another list at another time. The point here is that the peers are intended to be the only persons who may find a defendant guilty, and they may decide not to do so for whatever reason or reasons they may choose. The U.S. Constitution fixes a flaw in the legal systems of England, Canada, and perhaps others that have branched off of the English system in that double jeopardy for the same crime is prohibited. Once a jury of peers finds a defendant to be "not guilty", that finding is unreviewable and irreversible by any court. So if a sizable portion of the population dislikes a statute or believes it to be invalid under the Constitution or thinks the statute is being inappropriately applied, they can refuse to convict. The next defendant to be tried under the same statutory provision will, of course, be tried by a different jury of peers and may obtain a different result, but the tradition of trial by peers has ended up in practice bringing down many a bad statute here (e.g., alcohol prohibition, Fugitive Slave Act, etc.), which is probably the motivation for judges now refusing to advise juries of their power and even lying to juries by telling them they do not have it. > > Sadly, that >> does not always happen. >> >> If you buy a DVD and make a copy for your own use according to >> DMCA you are a criminal. However if you buy a videotape of the >> same movie and make a copy for your own use you are not a criminal. >> Clearly, both actions are morally "right" They are almost the same >> action in fact. But one is illegal the other isn't. Can't you >> see here that the problem isn't the action but the law? >> > >Of course, however, if you copy the DVD you have violated the law and by >definition you are a criminal. Now, you may decide your actions are right, >but you need to do that with the full knowledge that you *could* be found >in violation of the law and you *could* go to jail. To violate the law and >then whine that it's unfair is childish. > >> In this lawsuit, the worst you can say is that both parties, >> the spammer and the spamfighter, are in the wrong. But I fail to >> see how the spammer can be "right" and the spamfighter is "wrong" >> > >Didn't say he was wrong. Just in violation of the law. > >> You can, if you wish, argue the spammer is "legal" and the >> spamfigher is "illegal" But, this simply illustrates that the >> law is bad - and for many people it is a moral duty to violate >> bad law. And I for one, am very glad that they feel this way. >> > >Again, there's absolutely nothing wrong with that *so long as* you are >fully willing to suffer the consequences. As with Rosa Parks, you may >succeed in illustrating how unfair the law is and getting it changed, but >you won't do it without paying a personal price. Ignorance of the law is This is, unfortunately, very true. >no excuse. > The courts have ruled thus, indeed, but as William Penn noted, that if the law requires one to be a lawyer to understand it, then it is not reasonable to expect the common man not to be ignorant of it. Now...all of the above thread and discussion are *way* off topic for this list. This is my first and only posting in this thread on this list. Any who wish to continue it should take it elsewhere. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 12:02:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9031C16A41B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:02:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from po-out-1718.google.com (po-out-1718.google.com [72.14.252.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6638113C45D for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:02:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: by po-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id y22so391910pof.3 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:02:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.110.11.10 with SMTP id 10mr61270tik.42.1201176150816; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:02:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio ( [67.189.206.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i20sm2447406wxd.2.2008.01.24.04.02.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 04:02:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:02:25 -0500 From: Gerard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080124070225.255eb9e5@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <47979341.1000100@FreeBSD.org> References: <20080123123511.3177137c@scorpio> <47979341.1000100@FreeBSD.org> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Face: 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 X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q User-Agent: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.3; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/1pJ5f_iv320e5HLwVUhU6Ik"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Subject: Re: Perl-5.10.0 in FBSD-7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:02:33 -0000 --Sig_/1pJ5f_iv320e5HLwVUhU6Ik Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:19:29 +0100 Kris Kennaway wrote: > Gerard wrote: > > I have not been able to find any information in regards to the > > latest version of Perl, version 5.10.0, released in December. > >=20 > > 1) When will this version be available in the ports system? >=20 > After 7.0 is released. >=20 > > 2) Will FreeBSD-7.0 use this as the default Perl version? >=20 > Not as it will be shipped, but users can upgrade to it later. I was=20 > going to say "easily upgrade", but that might turn out to be a lie :) >=20 > Historically, new versions of perl are a recipe for large amounts of=20 > pain because of all the old perl code that stops working. It would > be completely irresponsible to attempt that update prior to the > release (and moreover, the packages are already finalized for 7.0 > anyway, modulo security updates). IMHO, updating to a new OS is like buying a new car. I certainly would not purchase a new vehicle if it contained an old motor. Yes, I could swap out the old motor for a new one once I purchase it; however, wouldn't it have been wiser for the dealer to have done so and spared me the problem. Perhaps this is not the ideal analogy; however, I think you get the idea. I just hope this decision does not cause the fiasco that the updating of Xorg caused and still, from reading the postings on this forum, still continue to cause for some users. Thanks for your response. --=20 Gerard gerard@seibercom.net Q: What do you get when you stuff a flaming stick down a rabbit-hole? A: Hot cross bunnies! --Sig_/1pJ5f_iv320e5HLwVUhU6Ik Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkeYflEACgkQ6DWTaTcTwMnZXwCfTaL6vGbJx+RjWPZ3stJdLPCI 2bYAn1VLCuE6NMmGZ1dS0X/0bcn15Dp7 =1o9o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/1pJ5f_iv320e5HLwVUhU6Ik-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 12:15:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD09016A419 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:15:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3134B13C4E8 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:15:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4798817A.2040105@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:15:54 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080123123511.3177137c@scorpio> <47979341.1000100@FreeBSD.org> <20080124070225.255eb9e5@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20080124070225.255eb9e5@scorpio> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Perl-5.10.0 in FBSD-7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:15:56 -0000 Gerard wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:19:29 +0100 > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> Gerard wrote: >>> I have not been able to find any information in regards to the >>> latest version of Perl, version 5.10.0, released in December. >>> >>> 1) When will this version be available in the ports system? >> After 7.0 is released. >> >>> 2) Will FreeBSD-7.0 use this as the default Perl version? >> Not as it will be shipped, but users can upgrade to it later. I was >> going to say "easily upgrade", but that might turn out to be a lie :) >> >> Historically, new versions of perl are a recipe for large amounts of >> pain because of all the old perl code that stops working. It would >> be completely irresponsible to attempt that update prior to the >> release (and moreover, the packages are already finalized for 7.0 >> anyway, modulo security updates). > > IMHO, updating to a new OS is like buying a new car. I certainly would > not purchase a new vehicle if it contained an old motor. Yes, I could > swap out the old motor for a new one once I purchase it; however, > wouldn't it have been wiser for the dealer to have done so and spared > me the problem. Perhaps this is not the ideal analogy; however, I think > you get the idea. > > I just hope this decision does not cause the fiasco that the updating > of Xorg caused and still, from reading the postings on this forum, > still continue to cause for some users. > > Thanks for your response. It's not going to happen. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 14:07:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A7116A417 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:07:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SO=f2168f00@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E97613C478 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:07:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+SO=f2168f00@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F54163F79 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:35:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A719CD05B0 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 08:35:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:35:45 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080124133545.01217814@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <47960812.8070101@highperformance.net> References: <4795F37B.4040908@gmail.com> <47960812.8070101@highperformance.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Updating older 7.0 to newer sources, local buildworld problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:07:01 -0000 On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:13:22 -0800 "Jason C. Wells" wrote: > Sten Daniel Soersdal wrote: > > I'm having troubles updating my buildworld and i've had troubles > > narrowing it down on google. > > > > My question is: > > > > Is there any way i could update the system in the state it is now? > > (Preferably without reinstalling the entire system from scratch.) > > > > PS. I've heard about freebsd-update but never got it to work (see > > below) > > I have never used freebsd-update so I can't comment there. I think > that's a binary update though. You are trying to build from source. > > I would use cvsup to update my source tree to 7.0-RELEASE. Since > your initial sources are before Sep 19, they are not 7.0-RELEASE. > Read about cvsup in the handbook. Look at the example files in > /usr/share/examples/cvsup. The I would run 'make clean' and 'make > buildworld' all over again. > > Except for creating a newfs and tweaking files in /etc, building the > world is pretty much installing the entire system. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cutting-edge.html > > Be careful about the cvs tag that you use. RELENG_7_0_0_RELEASE is > what you will eventually want. If that tag has not yet been set by > releng@, then you will delete your sources. I recommend '-d 20' with > cvsup to protect yourself from accidental deletions. I don't see the need for that, /usr/src/ isn't particularly precious, and it may well be the case that you do need to remove that many files across a major upgrade. > RELENG_7 is > probably what you want until 7.0 is actually released. Since it already exists (I'm using it), the best tag to use is RELENG_7_0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 14:17:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE5116A468 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:17:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx00.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.199]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08BE313C4D5 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:17:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lavalamp@spiritual-machines.org) Received: from [172.16.156.151] (pool-71-182-130-170.pitbpa.fios.verizon.net [71.182.130.170]) (AUTH: LOGIN seklecki, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,256bits,AES256-SHA) by wingspan with esmtp; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:17:23 -0500 id 00056417.47989DF3.0000A05E From: "Brian A. Seklecki" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:17:21 -0500 Message-Id: <1201184242.3015.6.camel@new-host> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-1.fc8) Subject: RELENG_6_3 build fail -- signal 13 consistently X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:17:25 -0000 This is 6.3/amd64 release as a guest inside a vmware server (free) host: ===> gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ar (install) install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 ar /opt/relchroot/usr/bin *** Signal 13 Make.conf has some sparing NO_ knobs set and: COPTS=-pipe CFLAG=-pipe Other than that, its a vanilla source tree: FreeBSD fbsdbuild-amd64-63 6.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE #0: Wed Jan 16 04:45:45 UTC 2008 root@dessler.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP i386 kern.hz=100 in loader.conf as well. Pretty crazy. ~BAS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 14:32:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C3216A468 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:32:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from message@hsbc.fr) Received: from getmorejoboffers.co.uk (getmorejoboffers.co.uk [87.106.66.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9160713C45B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:32:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from message@hsbc.fr) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=infongd10554.rtr.kundenserver.de) by getmorejoboffers.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1JI2rO-0002GU-00 for questions@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:15:18 +0100 Received: from user (see x-sender-info) by infongd10554.rtr.kundenserver.de with local id 0XgncZ-1JI2rO0x5H-0002GG; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:15:18 +0100 X-Sender-Info: <192743834@infongd10554.rtr.kundenserver.de> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:15:18 +0100 Message-Id: <0XgncZ-1JI2rO0x5H-0002GG@infongd10554.rtr.kundenserver.de> Precedence: bulk To: questions@FreeBSD.org From: HSBC Banque Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: important alerte X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Reply-To: message@hsbc.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:32:56 -0000 HSBC logo [spacer.gif] [1ptrans.gif] An important message to our Internet Banking Customers Message important à l'intention des utilisateurs des Services bancaires par Internet [1ptrans.gif] Le département de vérification comptable du Banque HSBC France a détecté un problème de transaction dans votre compte. Un montant a été déposé et retiré par notre système comptable. Nous vous avisons de cette erreur afin que vous ne soyez pas surpris quand vous verrez ces transactions sur votre relevé transactionnel. Nous avons repris le montant total sans appliquer les frais de transactions. Ne divulguez jamais vos renseignements personnels sur un site autre que le site sécurisé Banque HSBC France. Si vous constatez une autre erreur, communiquez avec votre institution durant les heures de [1]votre caisse. Pour accéder à votre compte et vérifier que tout soit normal, cliquez sur ce lien sécurisé si dessus : [2]http://www.hsbc.fr/1/2/hsbc-france/. Veuillez mettre vos signets à jour. [1ptrans.gif] Banque HSBC France [1ptrans.gif] [1ptrans.gif] < Due to concerns, for the safety and integrity of the HSBC bank Online Service we have issued this warning message. As a result of too many incorrect attempts to access and Login failures, Please note that Your HSBC bank Account has been terminated. In order for it to remain active, Please use the link below to verify and restore access to Your Account by clicking here : [3]http://www.hsbc.fr/1/2/hsbc-france/ Thank you for helping us to secure your online banking. [1ptrans.gif] Banque HSBC France CORYRIGHT Banque HSBC France 2008 . TOUS DROITS RÉSERVÉS. References 1. http://zx21.com/cpr/hsbc-fran/hsbc-frrr/hsbc-f/hsbc-uk/hsbc-uk/hsbc-uk/hsbc-uk/hsbc-uk/online.banking/ 2. http://zx21.com/cpr/hsbc-fran/hsbc-frrr/hsbc-f/hsbc-uk/hsbc-uk/hsbc-uk/hsbc-uk/hsbc-uk/online.banking/ 3. http://zx21.com/cpr/hsbc-fran/hsbc-frrr/hsbc-f/hsbc-uk/hsbc-uk/hsbc-uk/hsbc-uk/hsbc-uk/online.banking/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 15:36:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F86B16A421 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:36:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EEC413C46B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:36:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from seis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.93]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JI47c-0005dw-0Q for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:36:11 +0000 Received: from mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.184.33]) by seis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JI47b-00050t-88 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:36:07 +0000 Received: from mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0OFYrfw001601 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:34:53 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m0OFYrji001600 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:34:53 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:34:53 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080124153453.GA1546@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080123124756.GA1246@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080123124756.GA1246@mech-aslap33.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Spam-Score: -1.4 X-Spam-Level: - Subject: Solved: Re: /dev/lpt0: Device busy, lptcontrol: ioctl: Operation not supported X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:36:12 -0000 On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 12:47:56PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > My printing stopped working quite suddenly. > > Until today I used FBSD-6.3-prerelease (today I updated to 6.3-stable) > on compaq armada 1700 laptop to print on a parallel HP laserjet 2100 > printer in text mode and for postscript via apsfilter. All was fine. > > Then I got another parallel printer, epson lq-550 24-pin dot matrix, > and played with printing on both printers by just unplugging one > and plugging the other to the laptop's parallel port. For a while > all was fine. > > However, after several days, I cannot now print on either printer. > With laserjet I get > > # lptest 20 20 > /dev/lpt0 > /dev/lpt0: Device busy. > > With matrix printer I get > # lptest 20 20 > /dev/lpt0 > # > > but nothing is printed. > > I tried to play with lptcontrol, but I get the following: > > # lptcontrol -i -d /dev/lpt0.ctl > lptcontrol: ioctl: Operation not supported > # lptcontrol -s -d /dev/lpt0.ctl > lptcontrol: ioctl: Operation not supported > > I updated the OS and rebuilt the kernel: FreeBSD 6.3-STABLE > Wed Jan 23 10:46:54 GMT 2008, but that didn't help. > > In my device.hints I have the following printer related lines: > hint.ppc.0.at="isa" > #hint.ppc.0.irq="7" > > to enable the polling mode. > > My parallel port settings: > > # grep ppc /var/run/dmesg.boot > ppc0: at port 0x378-0x37f on isa0 > ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode > ppbus0: on ppc0 > # > > There is nothing in the /var/log/lpd-errs. > > My questions: > > 1. Could I have fried my parallel chip by changing the printers with > laptop powered on? How can I check this? Well, it seems there was some problem with the parallel chip. I tried various flags with ppc(4), polling and interrupt mode, with no luck, the "device busy" message was still there, and nothing would print. After that I decided to switch the machine off and on again, not just a hot reboot. And that did help, both printers are working fine. Perhaps due to hot swithching of printers there was some charge(?) on the parallel port chip, which made it appear busy.. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 928 8233 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 15:45:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7285216A41A for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:45:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@foster.cc) Received: from smtp.foster.cc (dango.foster.cc [64.79.194.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE2F13C442 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:45:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@foster.cc) Received: from [10.1.253.55] (unknown [198.134.96.10]) by smtp.foster.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5649350D1A9 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:27:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4798AE70.6020401@foster.cc> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:27:44 -0800 From: "Mark D. Foster" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071023) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freebsd questions References: <4797917B.4020600@gmail.com> <20080123142316.2d3ef433.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20080123213211.M8757@Robert-Eckardt.de> <47985BEA.60805@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <47985BEA.60805@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: VM Options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:45:45 -0000 Jack Barnett wrote: > To clarify, I would like to run Windows XP at least > > VMWare runs WinXP beautifully - but unfortunately VMWare doesn't well > under FreeBSD. > Last time I tried Qemu it was fairly slow. > > So Jail, Qemu and VMWare crossed off the list, any other options? Some other ideas... Serenity Virtual Station (http://www.serenityvirtual.com/) which claims to run on FreeBSD. I haven't yet tried it. VirtualBox (http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/VirtualBox) looks promising as another open-source alternative which runs (as host) on Windows, Linux and soon Mac OS X... could FreeBSD be far behind? -- Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints... Mark D. Foster, CISSP http://mark.foster.cc/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 15:52:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2AE16A420 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:52:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D877913C447 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:52:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0OFoBRG003966; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:50:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0OFo48o003959; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:50:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:50:04 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Prabhu Hariharan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20080124164941.Y3862@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unspecified IPv6 Address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:52:16 -0000 > > Why certain hosts of freebsd can be configurable with unspecified (::) > (all-zero) IPv6 addresses in its interfaces? RFC 4291 clearly mentions > "this address must never be assigned to any node". Is there is any use-case > or motivation behind accepting this address in an interface? simply don't assign it. what a problem? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 15:59:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78EFC16A41A for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:59:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E87713C46A for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:59:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l8so209680nzf.13 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:59:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.110.52.5 with SMTP id z5mr331236tiz.17.1201190377636; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:59:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.100.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h11sm1781014wxd.5.2008.01.24.07.59.35 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:59:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from obelix (obelix [192.168.17.13]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 189DF1140D for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:59:31 +0400 (GST) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:59:31 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@obelix.home.rakhesh.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <809d83890801232059i68492a69n883d2ac124013a3d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080124195406.N17168@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> References: <809d83890801232059i68492a69n883d2ac124013a3d@mail.gmail.com> X-Blog: http://rakhesh.com/ X-Notes: http://rakhesh.net/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Subject: Re: Doubled files or directories on samba. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:59:40 -0000 Hi, > Hello, > > I have some strange behavior with some files and some directories > being doubled on samba. When checking on freebsd file system all is > OK. Mounting partitions on windows clients or connecting with > smbclient would show some doubled files or directories. I mean the > same file appear twice. When deleting one from windows both disappear > but copying back the file from backup, again I have 2 files with the > same name. > > smb: \> ls DATA\RON\E* > EURO.XG0 A 4096 Wed Jan 23 14:58:44 2008 > EURO.XG0 A 4096 Wed Jan 23 14:58:44 2008 > > First I've upgraded samba to the latest port version (samba-3.0.28,1) - no joy. > > I've made a jail (maybe the ports are messed?) only with samba. Same result. > > I've source upgraded to 6.3-RELEASE. Nice but didn't solve the problem. > > The system was stable and I cannot relate any software maintenance > with the beginning of this behavior. > > Any pointers would be appreciated. Is this the case for all your shared folders? I found this thread with no answers (http://fixunix.com/samba/328376-samba-duplicate-filename-samba-3-0-28-a.html) where the problem hapens for a specific share and that too with a specific file. Have you tried this with a default config file? Or say one with minimal changes? Since when did this problem begin happening? Any extra info you can find in the logs? I've used Samba 3.0.25-28 on FreeBSD 6.2 and 6.3 but haven't encountered such a problem. Maybe you could add some stuff ''case sensitive = no'' and ''preserve case = yes'' to see if the file name case is making any difference. Just a shot in the dark, actually. Regards, Rakhesh --- http://rakhesh.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 17:52:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441D016A419 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:52:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01D8113C46A for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:52:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rakhesh@rakhesh.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so220976wxd.7 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:52:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.23.2 with SMTP id 2mr617599wxw.11.1201197134915; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:52:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.home.rakhesh.com ( [82.178.100.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h36sm504539wxd.29.2008.01.24.09.52.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:52:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from dogmatix (dogmatix [192.168.17.31]) by smtp.home.rakhesh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6AE1140C for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:45:57 +0400 (GST) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:46:12 +0400 (GST) X-X-Sender: rakhesh@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080124133117.N16149@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> Message-ID: <20080124213630.Y3365@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> References: <20080124133117.N16149@obelix.home.rakhesh.com> X-Blog: http://rakhesh.com/ X-Notes: http://rakhesh.net/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: Rakhesh Sasidharan Subject: Re: CARP and FreeBSD 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:52:16 -0000 > Hi, > > I have two machines. Each have two interfaces, xl0 and fxp0. And each have > two carp interfaces -- carp1 (xl0 of both) and carp2 (fxp0 of both). One of > the machines is master, the other is backup. > > I also have the following sysctl set: net.inet.carp.preempt -> 1 > > My understanding is that if I down one of the interfaces on the master > machine (say ''ifconfig xl0 down''), then both carp interfaces on the master > will be marked as down. And the backup will become the new master. Later, > when the interface is marked up (''ifconfig xl0 up''), the old master will > resume control. This is my understanding and that's how things were till > yesterday (when I was on FreeBSD 6.2/i386 with both machines). > > Today morning I upgraded both machines to FreeBSD 6.3 and that does not seem > to be the case any more. > > Now, on the master machine when I down the xl0 interface, only carp1 (the > group containing xl0) goes into init state (and the other machine's carp1 > interface becomes the new master). Ditto for fxp0 and carp2. So in essence, > the net.inet.carp.preempt=1 sysctl does not seem to be working as expected > which is unlike how things were in FreeBSD 6.2. > > Has something changed with regards to carp between FreeBSD 6.2 and 6.3? Any > one else encountering a similar problem? I happened to reboot the machines now while sitting at the console. And I noticed that the master machine emits an error like ''carp2: incorrect hash'' while booting up. Checking the console logs showed me that the errors have been appearing ever since I upgraded the machine. Most of the times it was to do with carp2, once it was to do with carp1. Here's the relevant bits of my rc.conf file from the master machine. ---8<-- ifconfig_fxp0="inet 192.168.10.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 polling" ifconfig_fxp0_alias0="inet 192.168.10.11 netmask 255.255.255.255" ifconfig_xl0="inet 192.168.20.20 netmask 255.255.255.0 polling" cloned_interfaces="carp1 carp2" ifconfig_carp1="vhid 1 pass password advskew 0 192.168.10.2 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_carp2_alias0="vhid 2 pass password advskew 0 192.168.20.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_carp2_alias1="vhid 2 pass password advskew 0 192.168.20.2 netmask 255.255.255.0" ---8<-- Its the same on the backup machine, except for the different IPs for fxp0 and xl0. Thanks, Rakhesh --- http://rakhesh.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 17:54:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE62416A419 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:54:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grayfoxbsd@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.238]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECEA13C455 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:54:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grayfoxbsd@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 68so149521wra.13 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:54:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=jwudAefBQheDmnU/fOROX5NtmVU5xmmIRtIBKkdPkMQ=; b=WwcQEMZxE+dDkSjTW0aAMPb4BdaEqRAMYow08w1XMUdeVurFM8r7eHG2aCNOsa0C8AqmPuhHMtvylhkd9E1+z2BiBvfItZ6YVpVIM6+hUNk8kQdTpuNFKPltFUr8m0ZLl4EdekNXp4PjKnrD/dqQA4Mt/yMuDNN7S4yVf5LZNC0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=FMSrF9dt32uU2Dx3bkGO+xwk6FJ8+E3xkPZHJd0iox1zljHg5rZur+TK+vGjsUqoKzGQm3XcYmcJyJuxkEQsdpdPkeWfH0TEQrJTOiluNDsV9P7aApfAbl+P5koHEq3bW0GpwsgXwD1cHmI12S3aSUe+6WUPUAEpP4b878Sy7DQ= Received: by 10.142.241.10 with SMTP id o10mr544535wfh.27.1201195615697; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:26:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.245.2 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 09:26:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:26:55 -0300 From: "Thiago Pollachini" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Limit UDP packets X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:54:13 -0000 Hi everybody Does anybody tried to limit udp connections, like ipfw limit ? I was searching about and only on linux it's possible. Is it true? Can anyone give me a clue? Very thanks! Thiago Pollachini From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 18:44:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E25F16A46D for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:44:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: from ro-out-1112.google.com (ro-out-1112.google.com [72.14.202.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80A213C455 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:44:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nullpt@gmail.com) Received: by ro-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id d36so368580roh.13 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:44:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=KeHqAVBm/5v6PamMeizUEQA+1QmI9i8b/AryKciBzAw=; b=mPViINlZ7tukEnl1dbSA0HkbJrnps0oQk3Ye7qzF7F+Q1KM4+HKRwSoOVJx0pnt4Ez/f8EJ/dzhzcq2Dkvf3kODC2Ra4bRw2XzWpryIii7UBBInx9QtQ/O8Qu1LPvIRCDRkgrFv7RZv4VtWKgvcBRbHLGdWBzwJQxKrj02o3Azc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=aL88FnkWDVigSYmm9Yy94QCObYgEYFa2WMMjAsXFyPHjuiZSPNRg7WeYWsStYNLtTZUdRlX9VUmta7tqxWKNqtkzzQ1one0+5XRteAJVkCMjfKpFUTTDzCvw7pUasNRG158X9rECUKvhi5m1de7/MtTCG6P6smzTYM6qI4Z8Guo= Received: by 10.115.88.1 with SMTP id q1mr1145830wal.98.1201200222029; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:43:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.60.11 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:43:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <755cb9fc0801241043k3b39b585keea0082988c2d0db@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:43:41 +0000 From: "Alexandre Vieira" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <755cb9fc0801151358k35cdd267x7500767925e5f3cc@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <755cb9fc0801151129h6e519557g7ea33e4190196fed@mail.gmail.com> <478D1694.8010906@FreeBSD.org> <200801151529.32312.brad@comstyle.com> <755cb9fc0801151358k35cdd267x7500767925e5f3cc@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Relayd (former hoststated) status for freebsd 7.0RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:44:10 -0000 On Jan 15, 2008 9:58 PM, Alexandre Vieira wrote: > > > On Jan 15, 2008 8:29 PM, Brad wrote: > > > On Tuesday 15 January 2008 15:24:52 Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > > > Alexandre Vieira wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > > > > > I remember that there was a port (net/hoststated) where I could > > install > > > > hoststated to use with PF. Anyone can shed a light on what is the > > status of > > > > this software implementation on 7.0? > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps ports/net/ifstated is the answer? > > > > > > BMS > > > > ifstated and relayd (used to be hoststated) are for totally different > > purposes. > > > > -- > > This message has been scanned for viruses and > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > > believed to be clean. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > Hi, I meant hostated aka hoststated aka relayd. It's in Obsd base system > and had there was a port for freebsd not long ago. > > I've found the old port structure: > http://people.freebsd.org/~flz/local/ports/hoststated/which stands for ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/local-distfiles/flz/hoststated/hoststated-20070131.tgz > . > > Many changes were commited since 07/01/31: http://kho.bonghongxanh.vn/pub/.disk0/ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/cvs/src/usr.sbin/relayd/Makefile,v > > > Added flz@ to the loop. > TIA for any effort to get this working. > > Kind Regards > > > > -- > Alexandre Vieira - nullpt@gmail.com > FYI http://www.freshports.org/net/relayd/ kudos to kuriyama@ -- Alexandre Vieira - nullpt@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 19:19:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CEF16A419 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:19:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sullrich@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5002413C467 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:19:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sullrich@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so64023nfb.33 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:19:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=IDPiInw1ea6rKnPbQAPNpbPM5EW4MxB3UyjkMfXYCcw=; b=Yw7bFgwXzEBZcIbwKDCj2Zk8DsudgFCwNUtC4lD4Cad1Olpk55Ki9pe+dELh3iDk5a/QZqsGct/kpwOC2FL5wf4z9zHp0ulGKmAxJ18G4ZmfK5fHA/TrlGhCpe5tIkZpN4k24SxrKA90KlIhAHOc7ETvs0uwFt50ibfgWDzgf4M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OtybMKyDaDV63EWBsdt+nZ/uhlgIPAfOXsz1NM3UFPMusMTC4Rbed1fnk0ScGH1hJLMiswGZKvLfcW9VKdSVvslWooavt+iy5voXcLH2gwXOcjyslA7uB+YAzwOTaIJ7KcgJO5mdNqG0zkLVN2sqNW9hkjWF4I2Q+AmrOmzruxc= Received: by 10.78.136.9 with SMTP id j9mr1464564hud.70.1201200725194; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:52:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.166.13 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:52:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:52:05 -0500 From: "Scott Ullrich" To: "Alexandre Vieira" In-Reply-To: <755cb9fc0801241043k3b39b585keea0082988c2d0db@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <755cb9fc0801151129h6e519557g7ea33e4190196fed@mail.gmail.com> <478D1694.8010906@FreeBSD.org> <200801151529.32312.brad@comstyle.com> <755cb9fc0801151358k35cdd267x7500767925e5f3cc@mail.gmail.com> <755cb9fc0801241043k3b39b585keea0082988c2d0db@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Relayd (former hoststated) status for freebsd 7.0RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:19:09 -0000 On 1/24/08, Alexandre Vieira wrote: > FYI > > http://www.freshports.org/net/relayd/ > > kudos to kuriyama@ > > -- > Alexandre Vieira - nullpt@gmail.com Yay! Thanks to everyone involved in bringing this over. I was about to start porting this and you just saved me a lot of time :) Scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 19:58:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1B416A420 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.155]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 410F813C458 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:58:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so377778fgg.35 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:58:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; bh=5VaktlNvt4sv/0yRCMyisqN5UqhxduKoFVkXSHyM6/0=; b=uIYAhVVBnvhkTXTOpzNUCIxIOy90wNW48NDphNo42qDGzCjM2n83fDeZ0Jqa3w6cnKUc+1ZUo9xHOGGxz5VlS7IrdUDI6nb1FHUIO40O5dnBkMSXbniW4rp53Lfwp+DPzvoZBkWWr0r0PtqgSUYZncexXSxU683reCtv7cQ9VMA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:x-google-sender-auth; b=YAnS7pV+mQ/wjMaeTTPYgzyTHQFADuf34buPwuC+vc0dFMMFF484ZeIOF5VzCDfU5RzWYGx/Ikm7KwEYpS9mLq9VyMwf0E4ja+k5/pIKThIYrnou1w477RiJ85pEzGWjFOmASH3E+chZDwrEW1BNyQ2z24xhnVrUPbfLvCfwnq0= Received: by 10.82.149.8 with SMTP id w8mr1975636bud.24.1201204698681; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:58:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.108.2 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:58:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:58:18 +0100 From: "Colin Brace" Sender: colin.brace@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Google-Sender-Auth: f804b648818db77c Subject: spamd-setup can't find spamd.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:58:20 -0000 Hi all, I am trying to set up spamd to work in conjunction with pf; as a reference I am using chapter six from Peter Hansteen's "The Book of BF", which I picked up today. I've installed the spamd port, which many of you will know calls itself obspamd under FreeBSD, and I have the daemon running now on my v.7-PRELEASE system. But for some reason I can't update the blacklist tables: $ sudo /usr/local/sbin/spamd-setup -n spamd-setup: Can't find "all" in spamd config: No such file or directory Dan mentions this error message in his tutorial: If you get the following error message: # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/pfspamd start Starting pfspamd. spamd-setup: Can't find "all" in spamd config: No such file or directory then you probably forget to create /usr/local/etc/spamd.conf (see above) or you removed the all section from it. [full: ] Thing is, the file really is there and contains the "all" statement: $ grep -A 2 all: /usr/local/etc/spamd.conf all:\ :uatraps:whitelist: Anyone have any idea what is going wrong here? TIA -- Colin Brace Amsterdam http://lim.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 20:06:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B803616A421 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darryl@osborne-ind.com) Received: from ws2.cnweb.com (ws2.cnweb.com [69.50.194.62]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D74313C45B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darryl@osborne-ind.com) Received: (qmail 14849 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2008 14:06:10 -0600 Received: from softdnserror (HELO Europa) (24.225.23.245) by ws2.cnweb.com with SMTP; 24 Jan 2008 14:06:10 -0600 From: "Darryl Hoar" To: Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:04:57 -0600 Message-ID: <4D7C61F532B94753B2D67B97B3B3C5DE@Europa> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16545 Subject: What version of Freebsd to run X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: darryl@osborne-ind.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:06:17 -0000 Greetings, Just received my Dell PowerEdge SC 1435. Going to be a webserver for me. What version of Freebsd should I run on this box ? I want rock solid stability. thanks, Darryl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 20:14:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0248C16A417 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:14:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from canito@dalan.us) Received: from netbits.us (ptr-89.fastconcepts.net [209.18.107.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C5C813C458 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:14:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from canito@dalan.us) Received: (qmail 14138 invoked by uid 65534); 24 Jan 2008 20:14:39 -0000 Received: from 64.122.68.138 ([64.122.68.138]) by mail.dalan.us (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:14:39 -0600 Message-ID: <20080124141439.qv9w81nykg4k0ksw@mail.dalan.us> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:14:39 -0600 From: David Alanis To: darryl@osborne-ind.com References: <4D7C61F532B94753B2D67B97B3B3C5DE@Europa> In-Reply-To: <4D7C61F532B94753B2D67B97B3B3C5DE@Europa> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.4) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What version of Freebsd to run X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:14:41 -0000 Darryl: How dare you ask such question? I mean, if you need to ask such question maybe Windows XP will be a solution for you? Just kidding, I run a similiar dell http/mail/asterisk/dns/IPv6 amd64 7.0 pre-release under zfs and I couldn't be happier!!! David Quoting Darryl Hoar : > Greetings, > Just received my Dell PowerEdge SC 1435. Going to > be a webserver for me. What version of Freebsd should > I run on this box ? I want rock solid stability. > > thanks, > Darryl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 20:15:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D033B16A417 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4BFF13C4CE for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so345866rvb.43 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:15:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ETjkHGFN3E6bR+2f4hNRGY9g9zbVoIgm2YDS85tt/68=; b=h/Ozy+5fcnJlulgrBkTryglXzGDjBMkycjccpK+XshsP1yy02/SQuJA5EFrPRpFOn18IA+1H6uYTeRVzlVjC2dWhkQUt0F0/RQSnB8BHoqLBj04QeQUYSSAaM4d3AtEm7zPoM8c/o96w4UhwbRizt8+8BkV5kLfNhQYNS6ODBxw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kOl15GGQlJWyhSpIkhIJzTMCp0AhHm38aFXbHlEJN5pJLvd+R+qMqZmFYSVbKsRE+CRu1Mwl8QS0bS7Y7l1k2RIR+RJzUTy7OePQhoBOv1vmtS03jKn6eqIredYrNVSSpQyzuDAi2Stbfn362ZKvRm7TeLfM5QTtjFFuoePJfhI= Received: by 10.141.175.5 with SMTP id c5mr774357rvp.281.1201205714084; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:15:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz ( [67.85.89.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f15sm980478qba.23.2008.01.24.12.15.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:15:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4798F1D0.3090009@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:15:12 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080121) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: speeding up buildworld/kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:15:14 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I update my sources at least once a day and do buildworld/kernel just as often... It seems some stuff that needs not be recompiled is on every single run for example gcc and kerbos. I have NO_CLEAN in /etc/make.conf is there anything else I can do to speed stuff up... for ref here is my /etc/make.conf: CPUTYPE?=nocona KERNCONF=MONSTER NO_CLEAN= NO_LPR= # added by use.perl 2008-01-17 11:48:48 PERL_VER=5.8.8 PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Tool Developers Developer, not business, friendly http://www.flosoft-systems.com "Free software != Free beer" Blog: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHmPHPQi2hk2LEXBARAofVAKD5MBoQ24Wal5CjKng5bUv8Pp2/mQCfcX6p NfCsz8egGQjn9KFPQ0Frths= =XeOG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 20:24:33 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC4E16A417 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:24:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@ridecharge.com) Received: from exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-2.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6630913C46A for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:24:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@ridecharge.com) Received: from philip.hq.rws (74.93.213.161) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.0.744.0; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:24:31 -0800 Message-ID: <4798F3FF.1020502@ridecharge.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:24:31 -0500 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: Ridecharge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070919) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <20080123123511.3177137c@scorpio> <47979341.1000100@FreeBSD.org> <20080124070225.255eb9e5@scorpio> <4798817A.2040105@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4798817A.2040105@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Perl-5.10.0 in FBSD-7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:24:33 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > It's not going to happen. I completely agree -- but I'm talking about it being the default perl version. There shouldn't be much of anything stopping lang/perl5.10 from appearing. I'm not saying it needs to be shipped with 7.0-release. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (philip@ridecharge.com) o:703.549.2050x206 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com / http://ridecharge.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 20:25:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F8416A417 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:25:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EBA13C459 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:25:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0OKMhGQ037647; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:22:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m0OKMhjU037646; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:22:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:22:43 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Darryl Hoar Message-ID: <20080124202243.GA37614@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <4D7C61F532B94753B2D67B97B3B3C5DE@Europa> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D7C61F532B94753B2D67B97B3B3C5DE@Europa> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What version of Freebsd to run X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:25:26 -0000 On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 02:04:57PM -0600, Darryl Hoar wrote: > Greetings, > Just received my Dell PowerEdge SC 1435. Going to > be a webserver for me. What version of Freebsd should > I run on this box ? I want rock solid stability. Use FreeBSD 6.3 and Apache 2.xxx ////jerry > > thanks, > Darryl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 20:32:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B15C16A468 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:32:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkhitrov@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.245]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2650A13C4D1 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:32:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkhitrov@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so100516anc.13 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:32:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=4pWOjrh0AP14W1YSst540o8oOo0fWaR4XpTlY0EYXPE=; b=Q25SOajQYipz2kFwZo418vR1nHoIfQHle5JgOzKfSQs9872iTzLfAxCVU2onsnlQAYS0pbeg6bsDJvcQM+LKSPTNWSc0XHbzOF21+LNuEFacA2pD0qPpJUJmCB0o/Y4E9wOlyY/dLw2ScdW+/LFzwRJvrnIvjdmNAUgnlNudwBY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=S3W/TA9WYjPegkZhSkjlxIUS0bdIqnMo4VylsudVEu8Mo3XSWMkkQviFDzHWYtyYBq855lmH5mdY0U0Ezh5BLi8Hnh6trVURNcvKI7RnYE9FEihKYqWkbSUtor+v7Gd9IgU6bH0neFrjbwPqmM3vl31Iyy4NiVkH7eotzhcxYPc= Received: by 10.101.1.7 with SMTP id d7mr2310470ani.91.1201206738048; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:32:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.254.9 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 12:32:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <26ddd1750801241232l51792bf3ydc02e17e4be49d6e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:32:18 -0500 From: "Maxim Khitrov" To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" In-Reply-To: <4798F1D0.3090009@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4798F1D0.3090009@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: speeding up buildworld/kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:32:19 -0000 On Jan 24, 2008 3:15 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > I update my sources at least once a day and do buildworld/kernel just > as often... It seems some stuff that needs not be recompiled is on > every single run for example gcc and kerbos. I have NO_CLEAN in > /etc/make.conf is there anything else I can do to speed stuff up... > for ref here is my /etc/make.conf: > > CPUTYPE?=nocona > KERNCONF=MONSTER > NO_CLEAN= > NO_LPR= > # added by use.perl 2008-01-17 11:48:48 > PERL_VER=5.8.8 > PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 > > - -- > Aryeh M. Friedman > FloSoft Systems, Java Tool Developers > Developer, not business, friendly > http://www.flosoft-systems.com I might be wrong, but NO_CLEAN seems like a bad idea except in special circumstances. Install ccache, but make sure you set CCACHE_HASH_COMPILER environment variable to 1. That will make sure that the cache stays valid if the compiler executable is overwritten by an identical copy (as it would be on installworld). When the compiler changes the cache will be repopulated on the next rebuild. - Max From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 20:33:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7F516A46D for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:33:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6D513C4D9; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:33:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4798F619.5060900@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:33:29 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Philip M. Gollucci" References: <20080123123511.3177137c@scorpio> <47979341.1000100@FreeBSD.org> <20080124070225.255eb9e5@scorpio> <4798817A.2040105@FreeBSD.org> <4798F3FF.1020502@ridecharge.com> In-Reply-To: <4798F3FF.1020502@ridecharge.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Perl-5.10.0 in FBSD-7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:33:35 -0000 Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: >> It's not going to happen. > I completely agree -- but I'm talking about it being the default perl > version. There shouldn't be much of anything stopping lang/perl5.10 > from appearing. I'm not saying it needs to be shipped with 7.0-release. As mentioned, that will happen once the port is ready. Kris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 20:45:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1D916A41A for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:45:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.bluestop.org (muon.bluestop.org [IPv6:2001:41c8:1:548a::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC6413C448 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:45:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from [IPv6:2a01:348:10f:0:19aa:6c52:717:167f] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:348:10f:0:19aa:6c52:717:167f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.bluestop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F033031E; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:45:50 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4798F8D2.6030105@cran.org.uk> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:45:06 +0000 From: Bruce Cran User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jackbarnett@gmail.com References: <4797917B.4020600@gmail.com> <20080123142316.2d3ef433.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <20080123213211.M8757@Robert-Eckardt.de> <47985BEA.60805@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <47985BEA.60805@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Robert Eckardt , Bill Moran , Freebsd questions Subject: Re: VM Options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:45:52 -0000 Jack Barnett wrote: > > Robert Eckardt wrote: >> It depends on what you want to do. > > To clarify, I would like to run Windows XP at least > > VMWare runs WinXP beautifully - but unfortunately VMWare doesn't well > under FreeBSD. > Last time I tried Qemu it was fairly slow. > > So Jail, Qemu and VMWare crossed off the list, any other options? While Qemu is normally slow, there was a SoC project to add KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) support to FreeBSD - it uses the virtualization features built in to modern Intel and AMD CPUs. It speeds things up substantially. For more information go to http://feanor.sssup.it/~fabio/freebsd/lkvm/ If that doesn't work then you could also try emulators/kqemu-kmod/ - while it doesn't take advantage of the VT or SVM features in modern CPUs, it allows Qemu to run a lot of code natively and so speeds things up quite a bit. -- Bruce From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 20:55:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1E916A41B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:55:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kneel.pardoe@virgin.net) Received: from n066.sc1.he.tucows.com (smtpout0156.sc1.he.tucows.com [64.97.136.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4497D13C46B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:55:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kneel.pardoe@virgin.net) Received: from sc1-out04.emaildefenseservice.com (64.97.139.2) by n066.sc1.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) id 4769F91800424720 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:55:01 +0000 X-SpamScore: 2 X-Spamcatcher-Summary: 2, 0, 0, 7a5bb32005229d9d, c7f6bc6047701790, kneel.pardoe@virgin.net, -, RULES_HIT:355:379:599:601:973:988:989:1260:1261:1277:1311:1312:1313:1314:1345:1358:1359:1437:1515:1516:1518:1519:1534:1537:1561:1593:1594:1595:1596:1711:1714:1730:1747:1766:1792:2393:2551:2553:2559:2562:2828:3027:3636:3865:3867:3868:3869:4250:5007:7652, 0, RBL:none, CacheIP:none, Bayesian:0.5, 0.5, 0.5, Netcheck:none, DomainCache:0, MSF:not bulk, SPF:, MSBL:none, DNSBL:none X-Spamcatcher-Explanation: Received: from [192.168.0.2] (client-82-20-25-74.brhm.adsl.virgin.net [82.20.25.74]) (Authenticated sender: kneel.pardoe@virgin.net) by sc1-out04.emaildefenseservice.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:55:00 +0000 (UTC) From: neal To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:54:45 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <4797917B.4020600@gmail.com> <20080123213211.M8757@Robert-Eckardt.de> <47985BEA.60805@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <47985BEA.60805@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801242054.45879.kneel.pardoe@virgin.net> Subject: Re: VM Options X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:55:02 -0000 On Thursday 24 January 2008, Jack Barnett wrote: > So Jail, Qemu and VMWare crossed off the list, any other > options? I'm planning to do something similar but have moved to Kubuntu to run VMWare, then I can run PCBSD as a vm 'thingy' ;). neal. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 21:05:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A1D16A418 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:05:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93A2513C461 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:05:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from c83-253-25-183.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.25.183]:50142 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JI9GY-0005j1-3x for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:05:42 +0100 Received: (qmail 81358 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2008 22:05:39 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 24 Jan 2008 22:05:39 +0100 Received: (qmail 50139 invoked by uid 1001); 24 Jan 2008 22:05:39 +0100 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:05:39 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: Maxim Khitrov Message-ID: <20080124210539.GA50047@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: Maxim Khitrov , "Aryeh M. Friedman" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4798F1D0.3090009@gmail.com> <26ddd1750801241232l51792bf3ydc02e17e4be49d6e@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <26ddd1750801241232l51792bf3ydc02e17e4be49d6e@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Originating-IP: 83.253.25.183 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JI9GY-0005j1-3x. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1JI9GY-0005j1-3x 9d032ecec395909014bac676dab14521 Cc: "Aryeh M. Friedman" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: speeding up buildworld/kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:05:44 -0000 On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 03:32:18PM -0500, Maxim Khitrov wrote: > On Jan 24, 2008 3:15 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > > I update my sources at least once a day and do buildworld/kernel just > > as often... It seems some stuff that needs not be recompiled is on > > every single run for example gcc and kerbos. I have NO_CLEAN in > > /etc/make.conf is there anything else I can do to speed stuff up... > > for ref here is my /etc/make.conf: > > > > CPUTYPE?=nocona > > KERNCONF=MONSTER > > NO_CLEAN= > > NO_LPR= > > # added by use.perl 2008-01-17 11:48:48 > > PERL_VER=5.8.8 > > PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 > > > > - -- > > Aryeh M. Friedman > > FloSoft Systems, Java Tool Developers > > Developer, not business, friendly > > http://www.flosoft-systems.com > > I might be wrong, but NO_CLEAN seems like a bad idea except in special > circumstances. Install ccache, but make sure you set > CCACHE_HASH_COMPILER environment variable to 1. That will make sure > that the cache stays valid if the compiler executable is overwritten > by an identical copy (as it would be on installworld). When the > compiler changes the cache will be repopulated on the next rebuild. You are indeed wrong. NO_CLEAN will work fine almost all the time - except in special circumstances. The few times it does not work one can always do a 'make clean' by hand first. (Or even faster: 'rm -fr /usr/obj/*') If you set WRKDIRPREFIX to some useful value you can do the same thing for the ports tree. Personally I always compile with -DNO_CLEAN and use 'rm -fr' to clean. I have never had problems originating with this. ccache is not very useful for buildworld, since among the first thing buildworld does is to build the compiler and then use the newly built compiler to compile the rest. I.e. the already installed compiler (which is the one ccache will handle) will not be used for most of the build thus removing almost all the advantage of ccache. It is supposed to be possible to use ccache for buildworld as well, but that would require a bit of hackery. As for speeding up the build even more there a couple of things that can be tried: You can add NO_PROFILE=true to make.conf if you do not need profiling libraries. Set CFLAGS/COPTFLAGS to -O instead of -O2. This should speed up the compiler a bit since it will no have to do as much work. This will make programs slightly less well optimized, but since the vast majority of the system binaries are not really CPU-bound anyway it is unlikely that any performance loss will be noticed. If you have more than one CPU-core in your machine (and an SMP-enabled kernel) you can use the -j flag to tell make to run several jobs in parallell. Just be aware that building with -j does get broken occasionaly and there is no promise that it will always be fixed quickly. If you do run into problems when building with -j, try without -j before sending any bug reports. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 21:12:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFAA316A417 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:12:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9682B13C467 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:12:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so594327pyb.10 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:12:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Bg3lrGbv0pc0lOWlxttuFhuWXtNTDD9OD9B0ETjtYCE=; b=eLycubJToeu0ytj6OM0fmzttnY+R/RERxS1Gf8bxWB/7kClo7JJsvDKz06uZCw4oOWVMS6Yml+srfm5razS/yoN3K+mScWU1yEGtJZ4YaGJ2wOVLBKkNYTKr1z3rH803Z2iig8/0sDXzvy7nRuWbXUOKN+71BnFs0KOi2AYDdMI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=A++uW1hqZdKOpKIasE84/48u6QFje7ND/wVeBg0VGVXFWLB2qOV3SFHlvsxzlneE/oZ7iR0xhuQpH1G45gjEshePZoVa+xY9mUKlINbaR+epbixQ6p5qdmXZQON7vHLTbcIXyBJgClXLDNhBjWQe/IHDfMrqcYtUE5+bDJ+VGtQ= Received: by 10.65.204.7 with SMTP id g7mr2468336qbq.73.1201209164593; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:12:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz ( [67.85.89.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e19sm1040547qbe.6.2008.01.24.13.12.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:12:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4798FF4A.2040602@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:12:42 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080121) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxim Khitrov , "Aryeh M. Friedman" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4798F1D0.3090009@gmail.com> <26ddd1750801241232l51792bf3ydc02e17e4be49d6e@mail.gmail.com> <20080124210539.GA50047@owl.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20080124210539.GA50047@owl.midgard.homeip.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: speeding up buildworld/kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:12:46 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 03:32:18PM -0500, Maxim Khitrov wrote: >> On Jan 24, 2008 3:15 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman >> wrote: >>> I update my sources at least once a day and do >>> buildworld/kernel just as often... It seems some stuff that >>> needs not be recompiled is on every single run for example gcc >>> and kerbos. I have NO_CLEAN in /etc/make.conf is there >>> anything else I can do to speed stuff up... for ref here is my >>> /etc/make.conf: >>> >>> CPUTYPE?=nocona KERNCONF=MONSTER NO_CLEAN= NO_LPR= # added by >>> use.perl 2008-01-17 11:48:48 PERL_VER=5.8.8 PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 >>> >>> - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Tool Developers >>> Developer, not business, friendly >>> http://www.flosoft-systems.com >> I might be wrong, but NO_CLEAN seems like a bad idea except in >> special circumstances. Install ccache, but make sure you set >> CCACHE_HASH_COMPILER environment variable to 1. That will make >> sure that the cache stays valid if the compiler executable is >> overwritten by an identical copy (as it would be on >> installworld). When the compiler changes the cache will be >> repopulated on the next rebuild. > > You are indeed wrong. NO_CLEAN will work fine almost all the time > - except in special circumstances. The few times it does not work > one can always do a 'make clean' by hand first. (Or even faster: > 'rm -fr /usr/obj/*') If you set WRKDIRPREFIX to some useful value > you can do the same thing for the ports tree. Personally I always > compile with -DNO_CLEAN and use 'rm -fr' to clean. I have never had > problems originating with this. > > ccache is not very useful for buildworld, since among the first > thing buildworld does is to build the compiler and then use the > newly built compiler to compile the rest. I.e. the already > installed compiler (which is the one ccache will handle) will not > be used for most of the build thus removing almost all the > advantage of ccache. It is supposed to be possible to use ccache > for buildworld as well, but that would require a bit of hackery. > > > As for speeding up the build even more there a couple of things > that can be tried: > > You can add NO_PROFILE=true to make.conf if you do not need > profiling libraries. I thought most profiled libs had been removed in current but I will try this. I was also looking at NO_SHARED but my gut says this would cause a sigficant performence hit. > > Set CFLAGS/COPTFLAGS to -O instead of -O2. This should speed up the > compiler a bit since it will no have to do as much work. This > will make programs slightly less well optimized, but since the vast > majority of the system binaries are not really CPU-bound anyway it > is unlikely that any performance loss will be noticed. Do you have any numbers on this? > > If you have more than one CPU-core in your machine (and an > SMP-enabled kernel) you can use the -j flag to tell make to run > several jobs in parallell. Just be aware that building with -j > does get broken occasionaly and there is no promise that it will > always be fixed quickly. If you do run into problems when building > with -j, try without -j before sending any bug reports. Since I like to run it in the background (i.e. while doing stuff on a different X screen) I usually don't use -j unless I am doing a bare metal install and then I typically do core*4+2 for it's value. > > > > > - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Tool Developers Developer, not business, friendly http://www.flosoft-systems.com "Free software != Free beer" Blog: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHmP9KQi2hk2LEXBARAu7zAJ4/sGAzpMFCZOKkZBVx/s07KTRw9gCgwF1m 6ee/hiJIvj8gyieoq/ZxIz0= =tnVh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 21:35:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6048916A41B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sh1nny_kn1ght@yahoo.com) Received: from n2d.bullet.mail.tp2.yahoo.com (n2d.bullet.mail.tp2.yahoo.com [203.188.202.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBFED13C45B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:35:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sh1nny_kn1ght@yahoo.com) Received: from [202.43.196.225] by n2.bullet.mail.tp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Jan 2008 21:22:50 -0000 Received: from [217.12.4.214] by t2.bullet.tpe.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Jan 2008 21:22:49 -0000 Received: from [216.252.122.216] by t1.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Jan 2008 21:22:49 -0000 Received: from [69.147.65.173] by t1.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Jan 2008 21:22:48 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp508.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 24 Jan 2008 21:22:48 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 955825.69286.bm@omp508.mail.sp1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 91697 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Jan 2008 21:22:48 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=4Vp8Hjw26zyXLbLa3MTfMUWf/sARUqvDPMaYajInQsgSlHlbUJ1ecp2kd8zmNU/RBc6YIq3tR0/M0D/YCTXj3/WSKleRTDbxt51u0V46JhmI/npFGqR7KGTdBIqBS2hg6NdZcn8B63+Mxi4MqZLEZSnlXk1o5SKQVoYRRJDG+QA=; X-YMail-OSG: X394a3sVM1nW_oyOqxdLtn5cnXbgKkV4IEIwpJvP Received: from [41.219.192.25] by web44809.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:22:48 PST Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:22:48 -0800 (PST) From: shinny knight To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <866627.90540.qm@web44809.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Net-snmp on SPARC64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:35:07 -0000 G'day, I'm trying to upgrade Net-snmp package on FreeBSD 6.2 SPARC-64 machine but no matters if I'm trying port install or precompiled by using 'pkg_add -r' is not working. Let's start with precompiled package: Uninstall previous one (which by the way was net-snmp-5.1.3) Then: [root@dnscache1 net-snmp]# pkg_add -r net-snmp Fetching ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/sparc64/packages-6.2-release/Latest/net-snmp.tbz... Done. pkg_add: warning: package 'net-snmp-5.2.3_3' requires 'perl-5.8.8', but 'perl-5.8.8_1' is installed [root@dnscache1 net-snmp]# cat /usr/local/etc/snmpd.conf rocommunity public x.x.x.x [root@dnscache1 net-snmp]# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/snmpd start Starting snmpd. [root@dnscache1 net-snmp]# [root@dnscache1 ]# sockstat -4 |grep 161 root snmpd 39606 14 udp4 *:161 *:* [root@dnscache1 ]# ps aux |grep snmpd root 39606 0.0 0.7 23408 7160 ?? S 9:57PM 0:00.58 /usr/local/sbin/snmpd -c /usr/local/etc/snmpd.conf -p /var/run/snmpd.pid [root@dnscache1 ]# cat /etc/rc.conf |grep snmpd snmpd_enable="YES" snmpd_conffile="/usr/local/etc/snmpd.conf" [root@dnscache1 ]# ls /usr/local/etc/snmpd.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 138 Jan 24 21:53 /usr/local/etc/snmpd.conf [root@dnscache1 ]# tail -f /var/log/snmpd.log sysctl: physmem: Cannot allocate memory NET-SNMP version 5.2.3 Connection from UDP: [a.a.a.a]:57287 no storage for OID [root@dnscache1 ]# [root@dnscache1 ]# uname -a FreeBSD dnscache1.ph.starcomms.net 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 23:30:59 UTC 2007 root@s-dallas.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC sparc64 [root@dnscache1 ]# sysctl -a |grep physmem hw.physmem: 1063469056 Needles to say that I have plenty of free memory on the server, more than 350MB reported as free by top. I've noticed that CPU insted is going high for snmpd process: PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND 39879 root 1 132 0 51912K 31416K RUN 3:54 80.86% snmpd A snmpwalk from other machines is not returning anything. [root@nms ]# snmpwalk -v 1 -c public x.x.x.x Timeout: No Response from x.x.x.x Packets are reaching the server and appear also in snmpd.log file: [root@dnscache1 catalin]# tail -f /var/log/snmpd.log Connection from UDP: [x.x.x.x]:59023 Connection from UDP: [x.x.x.x]:59023 Connection from UDP: [x.x.x.x]:59023 Connection from UDP: [x.x.x.x]:59023 Connection from UDP: [x.x.x.x]:50194 Connection from UDP: [x.x.x.x]:50194 Connection from UDP: [x.x.x.x]:50194 Connection from UDP: [x.x.x.x]:50194 Connection from UDP: [x.x.x.x]:50194 No other error message in /var/log files except above one. Only strange thing is that warning for Perl, but I guess 5.8.8_1 should be fully compatible with 5.8.8 since it's only a patch issues by maintainers. Did anybody experienced issues with same? Any ideas what could be the reason? TIA for help. Best Regards, Catalin --------------------------------- Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 21:35:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2491116A417 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:35:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from mk-outboundfilter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-outboundfilter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33EE13C474 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:35:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) X-Trace: 17317472/mk-outboundfilter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/PIPEX/$MX-ACCEPTED/pipex-infrastructure/62.241.163.7 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 62.241.163.7 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: xfb52@dial.pipex.com X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CANOLmEc+8aMH/2dsb2JhbACvNA X-IP-Direction: IN Received: from blaster.systems.pipex.net ([62.241.163.7]) by smtp.pipex.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 24 Jan 2008 21:06:45 +0000 Received: from [192.168.23.2] (62-31-10-181.cable.ubr05.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [62.31.10.181]) by blaster.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1430DE0000A4; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:06:44 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4798FDE3.5070304@dial.pipex.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:06:43 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20061205 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Colin Brace References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: spamd-setup can't find spamd.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:35:53 -0000 Colin Brace wrote: >$ sudo /usr/local/sbin/spamd-setup -n >spamd-setup: Can't find "all" in spamd config: No such file or directory > >Dan mentions this error message in his tutorial: > > If you get the following error message: > # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/pfspamd start > Starting pfspamd. > spamd-setup: Can't find "all" in spamd config: No such file or directory > > then you probably forget to create /usr/local/etc/spamd.conf (see >above) or you removed the all section from it. > >[full: ] > >Thing is, the file really is there and contains the "all" statement: > > You could try running it under ktrace to double-check what is actually being opened. Simple to try. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 21:55:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8270D16A41B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:55:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0897F13C455 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:55:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so414155fgg.35 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:55:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=Ubnq7EMhZv+dAxfu/RXFDa0c0QBAkOvkskjHSeBnEYE=; b=W+P86P2/rXm/oXZlrW2mN3HAE6+QpYE0CfzBpHZiU8RmWTnh5RlYPTuF9sKSb4LuH9Fj6O6uocdP45kcRQt8kHPOkx5xYg5bBpGpsXMZfOOTvCm8cn450jENiaI2GblGCvIs1LKG1XiAH590deB0uF6vkiKLZaoCKbtqM7H92xk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=WnDj+NkXRnyskh8NQo2LSK8fxs599SYo8+qmC/W8U58Omc44Iq45HW1H3g0ztnj70QiiWeVIV+yV2NqPUL92Xnzy6wyCTZZwCZiR/wIQBtLdBe/5Y620hUG1cofB7N4l41GOQDLFl2M0oEL/VRPBZopqJj8sKxACI8mV2BQGRDI= Received: by 10.82.186.5 with SMTP id j5mr2198146buf.12.1201211723329; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:55:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.108.2 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:55:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:55:23 +0100 From: "Colin Brace" Sender: colin.brace@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4798FDE3.5070304@dial.pipex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4798FDE3.5070304@dial.pipex.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: facd4f25fe057946 Subject: Re: spamd-setup can't find spamd.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:55:25 -0000 On Jan 24, 2008 10:06 PM, Alex Zbyslaw wrote: > You could try running it under ktrace to double-check what is actually > being opened. Simple to try. Thanks Alex, that was helpful. Doing so revealed that spamd-setup was looking for spamd.conf in /usr/local/etc/spamd, not /usr/local/etc/ as indicated in the documentation I was following. (I now see the man page for spamd.conf indicates this.) -- Colin Brace Amsterdam http://lim.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 22:08:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC8F16A418 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:08:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A4313C46B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:08:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0OM6QuT004912; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:06:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0OM5mPe004901; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:06:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:05:48 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Darryl Hoar In-Reply-To: <4D7C61F532B94753B2D67B97B3B3C5DE@Europa> Message-ID: <20080124230508.E4900@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <4D7C61F532B94753B2D67B97B3B3C5DE@Europa> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What version of Freebsd to run X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:08:35 -0000 > Greetings, > Just received my Dell PowerEdge SC 1435. Going to > be a webserver for me. What version of Freebsd should > I run on this box ? I want rock solid stability. what you are already using and is rock-stable. like 6.2 for me (actually 6.2+freebsd-update=6.2p10) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 22:08:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C321A16A419 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:08:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkhitrov@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3020513C442 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:08:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkhitrov@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i29so310565wxd.7 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:08:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=OhVN7ENGraIKFQGcwQN7dfwt2qncLj1Jh2a132ML60Y=; b=Rr9bHNcl4g29rVxrNVcfIPm8HBbYpCttsDmrGrbivsez1/4eojPZcwnq/rdL+orRIERytY5+dV6ssZTwI9rqvLVNwapWoHgiCWwCEJ1zwbl+gvmEI54rP9qVO4jCkW2m3eOHU0sa8Gwr7ZARjyV5BOndetLmbSH7DjyLVv2bFts= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jCODW/9Z8amjVaVY8RSIA4E1NZdiGUnBSOshxiviRsuTrtjfh2hj3WKrbN28m+/rdXmevtAlh8koXATj906fUnjBNIPI7WGoBphNOO/bZFUo2rLnSkRkd/IBqfP2OLZWd2KZwU1Zg/C3t5SVErS9pTAGCehTqJQMUiU4oxprUWA= Received: by 10.142.109.16 with SMTP id h16mr805504wfc.38.1201212514703; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:08:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.242.11 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:08:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <26ddd1750801241408w7b776c87g14b94cfa1433616a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:08:34 -0500 From: "Maxim Khitrov" To: "Erik Trulsson" , "Aryeh M. Friedman" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080124210539.GA50047@owl.midgard.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4798F1D0.3090009@gmail.com> <26ddd1750801241232l51792bf3ydc02e17e4be49d6e@mail.gmail.com> <20080124210539.GA50047@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Cc: Subject: Re: speeding up buildworld/kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:08:36 -0000 On Jan 24, 2008 4:05 PM, Erik Trulsson wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 03:32:18PM -0500, Maxim Khitrov wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2008 3:15 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > > > I update my sources at least once a day and do buildworld/kernel just > > > as often... It seems some stuff that needs not be recompiled is on > > > every single run for example gcc and kerbos. I have NO_CLEAN in > > > /etc/make.conf is there anything else I can do to speed stuff up... > > > for ref here is my /etc/make.conf: > > > > > > CPUTYPE?=nocona > > > KERNCONF=MONSTER > > > NO_CLEAN= > > > NO_LPR= > > > # added by use.perl 2008-01-17 11:48:48 > > > PERL_VER=5.8.8 > > > PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 > > > > > > - -- > > > Aryeh M. Friedman > > > FloSoft Systems, Java Tool Developers > > > Developer, not business, friendly > > > http://www.flosoft-systems.com > > > > I might be wrong, but NO_CLEAN seems like a bad idea except in special > > circumstances. Install ccache, but make sure you set > > CCACHE_HASH_COMPILER environment variable to 1. That will make sure > > that the cache stays valid if the compiler executable is overwritten > > by an identical copy (as it would be on installworld). When the > > compiler changes the cache will be repopulated on the next rebuild. > > You are indeed wrong. NO_CLEAN will work fine almost all the time - except > in special circumstances. The few times it does not work one can always do > a 'make clean' by hand first. (Or even faster: 'rm -fr /usr/obj/*') > If you set WRKDIRPREFIX to some useful value you can do the same thing > for the ports tree. > Personally I always compile with -DNO_CLEAN and use 'rm -fr' to clean. > I have never had problems originating with this. > > ccache is not very useful for buildworld, since among the first thing > buildworld does is to build the compiler and then use the newly built > compiler to compile the rest. I.e. the already installed compiler (which is > the one ccache will handle) will not be used for most of the build thus > removing almost all the advantage of ccache. > It is supposed to be possible to use ccache for buildworld as well, but > that would require a bit of hackery. That's not true. I just ran `make buildworld buildkernel` on my firewall. Here are ccache stats when the operation finished: root@cerberus [/root]# ccache -s cache directory /srv/.ccache cache hit 12056 cache miss 38 called for link 461 multiple source files 1 not a C/C++ file 1228 unsupported compiler option 7 files in cache 117366 cache size 679.6 Mbytes max cache size 2.0 Gbytes Ccache is used through the entire build process and there is no hackery involved. Just follow the directions for changing the compiler to /usr/local/libexec/ccache/world-cc. On this Celeron D 1.8 GHz machine rebuilding world and kernel takes 45 minutes and 40 seconds. I don't recall exactly what it was without ccache, but I think it was around 3 hours. Just make sure that you set the CCACHE_HASH_COMPILER variable, otherwise it will assume that the compiler is different just because its modification time has changed. - Max From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 24 22:10:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAEC216A46B for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:10:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61C813C468 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:10:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0OM8jMO004936; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:08:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m0OM8enD004933; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:08:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:08:40 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Jerry McAllister In-Reply-To: <20080124202243.GA37614@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Message-ID: <20080124230824.G4900@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <4D7C61F532B94753B2D67B97B3B3C5DE@Europa> <20080124202243.GA37614@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What version of Freebsd to run X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:10:43 -0000 >> be a webserver for me. What version of Freebsd should >> I run on this box ? I want rock solid stability. > > Use FreeBSD 6.3 and Apache 2.xxx well i use apache 1.* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 00:36:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64DD16A420 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:36:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abailey@sd61.bc.ca) Received: from aspen.itsd.gov.bc.ca (aspen.itsd.gov.bc.ca [142.32.11.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDCA13C468 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:36:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abailey@sd61.bc.ca) Received: from LYRA.sd61.bc.ca (pnfw.sd61.bc.ca [142.31.219.34]) by aspen.itsd.gov.bc.ca (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0P0Oegu008759 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:24:40 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:23:38 -0800 Message-ID: <309E0C3AEC3B6D478659EA4555C383490115FF09@LYRA.sd61.bc.ca> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: rsyncd.conf change Thread-Index: Ache6IgFg9CYYWoCT3uZwBj7kgLMxA== From: "Bailey, Andrew" To: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.5 (aspen.itsd.gov.bc.ca [142.32.11.114]); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:24:40 -0800 (PST) x-spam-status: Looks ok. X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aspen.itsd.gov.bc.ca X-Spam-Virus: No X-Spamassassin-Status: No, score=-100.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED shortcircuit=ham autolearn=disabled version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Level: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: rsyncd.conf change X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:36:45 -0000 I have successfully resolved a multuser samba configuration that uses rsync to backup to a remote freeNAS server however the changes to the conf file are overwritten whenever the server is restarted. I would like to be able to store GID =3D groupname properly through the webGUI = instead of kludging it after reboot please advise how to proceed. I do not want to diverge in my code from the project code but I do need this feature in order to use FreeNAS in my environment. We are connected to AD and have FreeNAS servers at remote schools rsyncing to our central FreeNAS server which is storing data to an iscsi device.=20 =20 I also found an error in the nssswitch.conf hosts=3D files dns wins should read hosts =3D files dns winbind (which again gets overwritten on reboot after I manually fix it). =20 I am competent in php and happy to make modifications if needed but desire to further this valuable project, please advise how to proceed. =20 Andrew Bailey Webmaster, Postmaster GVSD 61 475-4148 =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 00:43:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1851916A417 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:43:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B9313C45B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:43:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0P02PnK059708 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:02:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Content-Disposition: inline From: Gary Kline To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 16:02:25 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200801241602.25688.kline@thought.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Subject: Fwd: test X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:43:44 -0000 Well, yesterday when I tried mailing, i could have hit keystrokes until the cows came home and no characters were echoed. Evidently, I did _something_ to kdemail //KMail to let this work. Possibly after I pkg_deleted evolution. hm. ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: test Date: Thursday 24 January 2008 From: Gary Kline To: kline@thought.org testing, surprise, surprise. -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org ------------------------------------------------------- -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 02:55:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A5416A418 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:55:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kimimeister@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5802313C43E for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:55:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kimimeister@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so774387waf.3 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:55:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=pJFw0jRqhox9PCzEixG8oXmclHcmaDPnMDVcVZ8ECRY=; b=d2HuS4eHQZt6rszZvoxTr/pouqrIK/zfAmYvOzcN7YB9dEjQ0PLwhgwJ2n0cQltcM+pcvK835ygPHic4y6HkkROFXs85yhZ48eWLTdPWq0TdkXqLv7Fxk6KsCjqbn6qRtOpmOc1ySHrEEIwbetAq+RQgR1B/3KiV16MrH7elHYA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iJWwaK99alLj9LlsKlRWKpoWsViK6RDR5emeTQccF1r+7o6jg4kajDpXvEwFI7nCtDOGjg1SQYkPyJlhZcbf1qxXGurGlH+6jhmi/GlXHlZRfxhAqndFIbtPTBFwaWE7t1fxyAdXsslDtkVIHCayY97J4/Z7AZ0PP2P/n+3mCTA= Received: by 10.114.73.1 with SMTP id v1mr1695376waa.16.1201229718984; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:55:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.58.7 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:55:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <42b497160801241855i58b19777s3f3f03dec802443f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:55:18 +0000 From: Kimi To: "Gary Kline" In-Reply-To: <200801241602.25688.kline@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200801241602.25688.kline@thought.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: test X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 02:55:20 -0000 On 25/01/2008, Gary Kline wrote: > > > Well, yesterday when I tried mailing, i could have hit keystrokes > until the cows came home and no characters were echoed. Evidently, > I did _something_ to kdemail //KMail to let this work. Possibly after I > pkg_deleted evolution. > please don't spam this list, use test@ instead :) > hm. > > > ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- > > Subject: test > Date: Thursday 24 January 2008 > From: Gary Kline > To: kline@thought.org > > testing, surprise, surprise. > -- > Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix > http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > -- > Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix > http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Regards, Kimi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 04:01:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B9D16A417 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:01:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1C713C46E for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:01:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so779151pyb.10 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:01:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hUOJ48hZrzUXxZz7cX2X+qm22D78fik2vc/nmgWpWjQ=; b=odDyusGyqBsuccpMj0FmKWVsnvXNt5+nwd23C5CE9ImApFq4afgNzEZ79ifuvjgrqrp0siCCL+0Jz+a7bvaJJF82bdrEFiKpcOkcheJtO0JlJqhsdqZ4Ke101RSWHbTTsuFmKMnGUyGpRpc42koU8Vlet/rgf0/Tfjs+D9PdKA4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=GlKUvrALhHDSbnpeUPyKRHQn+p0XiFz4WgWOWMX2sTD5CbIFjTD1yeT5gxrRjQ25rbilm5qVgNLtRtYO4wqJnOSYgI1+sfaQHAeqBxHv2RjA6KSfqZqC8E82+0IndDRTBV9rSE/zBycv2pcXf53G811ai3LzjqECFow5BEABT5k= Received: by 10.65.83.18 with SMTP id k18mr3298376qbl.10.1201233693501; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:01:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz ( [67.85.89.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q14sm1369939qbq.33.2008.01.24.20.01.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:01:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47995F19.7050905@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:01:29 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080121) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxim Khitrov References: <4798F1D0.3090009@gmail.com> <26ddd1750801241232l51792bf3ydc02e17e4be49d6e@mail.gmail.com> <20080124210539.GA50047@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <26ddd1750801241408w7b776c87g14b94cfa1433616a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <26ddd1750801241408w7b776c87g14b94cfa1433616a@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: speeding up buildworld/kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:01:35 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Maxim Khitrov wrote: > On Jan 24, 2008 4:05 PM, Erik Trulsson > wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 03:32:18PM -0500, Maxim Khitrov wrote: >>> On Jan 24, 2008 3:15 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman >>> wrote: >>>> I update my sources at least once a day and do >>>> buildworld/kernel just as often... It seems some stuff that >>>> needs not be recompiled is on every single run for example >>>> gcc and kerbos. I have NO_CLEAN in /etc/make.conf is there >>>> anything else I can do to speed stuff up... for ref here is >>>> my /etc/make.conf: >>>> >>>> CPUTYPE?=nocona KERNCONF=MONSTER NO_CLEAN= NO_LPR= # added by >>>> use.perl 2008-01-17 11:48:48 PERL_VER=5.8.8 >>>> PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 >>>> >>>> - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Tool Developers >>>> Developer, not business, friendly >>>> http://www.flosoft-systems.com >>> I might be wrong, but NO_CLEAN seems like a bad idea except in >>> special circumstances. Install ccache, but make sure you set >>> CCACHE_HASH_COMPILER environment variable to 1. That will make >>> sure that the cache stays valid if the compiler executable is >>> overwritten by an identical copy (as it would be on >>> installworld). When the compiler changes the cache will be >>> repopulated on the next rebuild. >> You are indeed wrong. NO_CLEAN will work fine almost all the >> time - except in special circumstances. The few times it does >> not work one can always do a 'make clean' by hand first. (Or even >> faster: 'rm -fr /usr/obj/*') If you set WRKDIRPREFIX to some >> useful value you can do the same thing for the ports tree. >> Personally I always compile with -DNO_CLEAN and use 'rm -fr' to >> clean. I have never had problems originating with this. >> >> ccache is not very useful for buildworld, since among the first >> thing buildworld does is to build the compiler and then use the >> newly built compiler to compile the rest. I.e. the already >> installed compiler (which is the one ccache will handle) will not >> be used for most of the build thus removing almost all the >> advantage of ccache. It is supposed to be possible to use ccache >> for buildworld as well, but that would require a bit of hackery. > > That's not true. I just ran `make buildworld buildkernel` on my > firewall. Here are ccache stats when the operation finished: > > root@cerberus [/root]# ccache -s cache directory > /srv/.ccache cache hit 12056 cache miss > 38 called for link 461 multiple source files > 1 not a C/C++ file 1228 unsupported compiler > option 7 files in cache 117366 cache > size 679.6 Mbytes max cache size > 2.0 Gbytes > > Ccache is used through the entire build process and there is no > hackery involved. Just follow the directions for changing the > compiler to /usr/local/libexec/ccache/world-cc. On this Celeron D > 1.8 GHz machine rebuilding world and kernel takes 45 minutes and 40 > seconds. I don't recall exactly what it was without ccache, but I > think it was around 3 hours. Just make sure that you set the > CCACHE_HASH_COMPILER variable, otherwise it will assume that the > compiler is different just because its modification time has > changed. > > - Max > I think Erik is correct here are some times (done in the order listed): After adding NO_PROFILE to make.conf: flosoft# cvs -q update -dP M lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c flosoft# time make buildworld buildkernel installkernel installworld . . . 129.160u 49.686s 6:48.67 43.7% 1001+2748k 16259+6155io 29699pf+0w After installing ccache (first run): flosoft# setenv CCACHE_HASH_COMPILER 1 flosoft# set CCACHE_HASH_COMPILER=1 flosoft# time make buildworld buildkernel installkernel installworld . . . 117.765u 46.502s 4:56.24 55.4% 474+2667k 674+6151io 8269pf+0w flosoft# ccache -s cache directory /root/.ccache cache hit 0 cache miss 0 files in cache 0 cache size 0 Kbytes max cache size 976.6 Mbytes Second run: flosoft# time make buildworld buildkernel installkernel installworld . . . 118.318u 46.055s 4:46.64 57.3% 475+2644k 251+6145io 6203pf+0w flosoft# !cc ccache -s cache directory /root/.ccache cache hit 0 cache miss 0 files in cache 0 cache size 0 Kbytes max cache size 976.6 Mbytes After clearing out /usr/obj (with ccache turned off): Note: Even though I didn't time without NO_PROFILE this time I have in the past on the same machine and got about 1 hour 5 mins (so not a big savings) flosoft# rm -rf /usr/objflosoft# time make buildworld buildkernel installkernel installworld . . . 2549.561u 387.975s 58:08.69 84.2% 6352+7186k 27134+14972io 11234pf+0w Turning ccache back on (1st run): flosoft# rm -rf /usr/obj flosoft# setenv CCACHE_HASH_COMPILER 1 flosoft# set CCACHE_HASH_COMPILER=1 flosoft# time make buildworld buildkernel installkernel installworld . . . 2556.474u 392.932s 57:21.72 85.6% 6277+7130k 24444+15046io 6414pf+0w flosoft# ccache -s cache directory /root/.ccache cache hit 0 cache miss 0 files in cache 0 cache size 0 Kbytes max cache size 976.6 Mbytes Second run: flosoft# rm -rf /usr/obj flosoft# time make buildworld buildkernel installkernel installworld . . . 2647.683u 406.585s 1:29:41.15 56.7% 6265+7122k 18646+14931io 7350pf+0w flosoft# ccache -s cache directory /root/.ccache cache hit 0 cache miss 0 files in cache 0 cache size 0 Kbytes max cache size 976.6 Mbytes Just for sanity a final run without cleaning out /usr/obj and not having ccache: flosoft# time make buildworld buildkernel installkernel installworld . . . 166.330u 62.414s 17:28.56 21.8% 1830+2908k 5167+6726io 9397pf+0w Full Discloser Section: Hardware: e6850 CPU (dual core 3.0GHz) p35 chipset ihc9 disk controller 500 GB SATA/300 drive 4GB of RAM (DDR2 667) MSI Neo-F Mobo (Default jumper settings) nVidia 5200 FX (PCI, 256 MB) Not over clocked. Base system: FreeBSD flosoft.no-ip.biz 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #4: Thu Jan 24 14:47:29 EST 2008 aryeh@flosoft.no-ip.biz:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MONSTER amd64 Also running at various times: xfce4 (full install with dbus and hald running also) Allways on: firefox thunderbird miro deluge (with 1 download active) rythmbox Used during the 1st run of cleaning out /usr/obj and ccache open office 2 No reboots between runs and less then 1 minute pause between runs except between the 1st and second runs after cleaning /usr/obj (i.e. beofre and after ccache) No commands where issued on the terminal except the ones showed and ccache was installed with default settings (I didn't modify any files after doing "make install" for ccache) BTW I think the final sanity runs proves there is somekind of mem leak in xfce or xorg - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Tool Developers Developer, not business, friendly http://www.flosoft-systems.com "Free software != Free beer" Blog: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHmV8ZQi2hk2LEXBARAnyNAJ94onhHiOghmgMwI1IPBAFLSlnLuACeKTgG UE2bfmtMYpfOcSPnqxdbasQ= =KcWD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 04:29:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3056716A41B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:29:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johan@giantfoo.org) Received: from pangu.giantfoo.org (pangu.giantfoo.org [24.227.169.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D27E13C43E for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:29:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johan@giantfoo.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pangu.giantfoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119D1122A2 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:29:43 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:29:42 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <20080124.222942.13773964.johan@giantfoo.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Johan A. van Zanten X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: how to hardcode kernel dump device in kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:29:44 -0000 I'm trying to get a crash dump of a ZFS-related kernel crash, but it happens before "dumpon" has run, so i think i need to hardcode the device in the kernel. However, i can't find the syntax for this. Anyone have any ideas? All i've found in the docs is this: "Alternatively, the dump device can be hard-coded via the dump clause in the config(5) line of a kernel configuration file. This approach is deprecated and should be used only if a kernel is crashing before dumpon(8) can be executed." http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html#KERNELDEBUG-OBTAIN I've also looked at config(5). Thanks, johan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 04:35:22 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DAE16A41A for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:35:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkhitrov@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.240]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BC413C459 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:35:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkhitrov@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so141610anc.13 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:35:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=obFpdMKraeDadDF5ufd82Rl/xIksg1VVP3gfo7HAnjo=; b=UR/+SuQ34L0bpp9wzXfaWDd3hxqyrQBkPQVW8IRamM0Vfa84C4xxSWPhM3/rV/x0RUXzsyWUtYkIzg3v3mZfrpNAbJTedAn/Kyl3BqiF7Sii7sgTlzPOsZTEu7oTh0nP7yWbzKvCBdvSfVrCP8bvNbXRn3KLyy6TI38Joei2M4w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qFoGVj7WcpMg6GiJASKYcjZ6cTD/k0RIshr2wi/O0JfmGeP/zFTZIg19eh+fiJulGvCo87iySIKGAjp5DNc+X5AtMD7BBb028WrOtdXt5OubQGa2Y8A62BVH+SnMbTVJzWdU91xxjWfLvSgXDAq/d+OFNhqFiJqW0IlV/okZZo4= Received: by 10.100.107.7 with SMTP id f7mr3164879anc.108.1201235721138; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:35:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.254.9 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 20:35:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <26ddd1750801242035j3b3cea5ek281fe7e00afbf217@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 23:35:21 -0500 From: "Maxim Khitrov" To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" In-Reply-To: <47995F19.7050905@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4798F1D0.3090009@gmail.com> <26ddd1750801241232l51792bf3ydc02e17e4be49d6e@mail.gmail.com> <20080124210539.GA50047@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <26ddd1750801241408w7b776c87g14b94cfa1433616a@mail.gmail.com> <47995F19.7050905@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: speeding up buildworld/kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 04:35:22 -0000 On Jan 24, 2008 11:01 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Maxim Khitrov wrote: > > On Jan 24, 2008 4:05 PM, Erik Trulsson > > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 03:32:18PM -0500, Maxim Khitrov wrote: > >>> On Jan 24, 2008 3:15 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman > >>> wrote: > >>>> I update my sources at least once a day and do > >>>> buildworld/kernel just as often... It seems some stuff that > >>>> needs not be recompiled is on every single run for example > >>>> gcc and kerbos. I have NO_CLEAN in /etc/make.conf is there > >>>> anything else I can do to speed stuff up... for ref here is > >>>> my /etc/make.conf: > >>>> > >>>> CPUTYPE?=nocona KERNCONF=MONSTER NO_CLEAN= NO_LPR= # added by > >>>> use.perl 2008-01-17 11:48:48 PERL_VER=5.8.8 > >>>> PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 > >>>> > >>>> - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Tool Developers > >>>> Developer, not business, friendly > >>>> http://www.flosoft-systems.com > >>> I might be wrong, but NO_CLEAN seems like a bad idea except in > >>> special circumstances. Install ccache, but make sure you set > >>> CCACHE_HASH_COMPILER environment variable to 1. That will make > >>> sure that the cache stays valid if the compiler executable is > >>> overwritten by an identical copy (as it would be on > >>> installworld). When the compiler changes the cache will be > >>> repopulated on the next rebuild. > >> You are indeed wrong. NO_CLEAN will work fine almost all the > >> time - except in special circumstances. The few times it does > >> not work one can always do a 'make clean' by hand first. (Or even > >> faster: 'rm -fr /usr/obj/*') If you set WRKDIRPREFIX to some > >> useful value you can do the same thing for the ports tree. > >> Personally I always compile with -DNO_CLEAN and use 'rm -fr' to > >> clean. I have never had problems originating with this. > >> > >> ccache is not very useful for buildworld, since among the first > >> thing buildworld does is to build the compiler and then use the > >> newly built compiler to compile the rest. I.e. the already > >> installed compiler (which is the one ccache will handle) will not > >> be used for most of the build thus removing almost all the > >> advantage of ccache. It is supposed to be possible to use ccache > >> for buildworld as well, but that would require a bit of hackery. > > > > That's not true. I just ran `make buildworld buildkernel` on my > > firewall. Here are ccache stats when the operation finished: > > > > root@cerberus [/root]# ccache -s cache directory > > /srv/.ccache cache hit 12056 cache miss > > 38 called for link 461 multiple source files > > 1 not a C/C++ file 1228 unsupported compiler > > option 7 files in cache 117366 cache > > size 679.6 Mbytes max cache size > > 2.0 Gbytes > > > > Ccache is used through the entire build process and there is no > > hackery involved. Just follow the directions for changing the > > compiler to /usr/local/libexec/ccache/world-cc. On this Celeron D > > 1.8 GHz machine rebuilding world and kernel takes 45 minutes and 40 > > seconds. I don't recall exactly what it was without ccache, but I > > think it was around 3 hours. Just make sure that you set the > > CCACHE_HASH_COMPILER variable, otherwise it will assume that the > > compiler is different just because its modification time has > > changed. > > > > - Max > > > No commands where issued on the terminal except the ones showed and > ccache was installed with default settings (I didn't modify any files > after doing "make install" for ccache) It doesn't work like that. You have to read /usr/local/share/doc/ccache/ccache-howto-freebsd.txt and configure things properly before ccache is used for building the os. In /etc/make.conf you need to add the following: .if exists(/usr/local/libexec/ccache) && !defined(NOCCACHE) && \ (!empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/src*) || !empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/obj*)) CC= /usr/local/libexec/ccache/world-cc CXX= /usr/local/libexec/ccache/world-c++ .endif Unless you actually want to use /root/.ccache (and have enough space for it), I would move that directory to some other partition. In my /etc/csh.cshrc I have this configuration: setenv CCACHE_DIR /srv/.ccache setenv CCACHE_PATH /usr/bin:/usr/local/bin setenv CCACHE_HASH_COMPILER 1 Once you've done all of this, rebuild the world. You can run ccache -s during that process. If the hit/miss numbers stay at 0 then ccache is not being used. Check your configuration and try again. The first run will be slower than normal (though not by much), because the cache is being populated for the first time. On the second run, however, clear ccache stats (ccache -z) and you should see the same results as I've posted above. With the exception of only a few files, just about everything should be obtained from the cache and not compiled from scratch. - Max From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 05:15:17 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7129416A469 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2629313C4DB for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:15:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so825379pyb.10 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:15:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yrg0QWYvH61yr76CoigupaG9/nbDEWycWbgIU8YUYCE=; b=wjvQDL9hkcARiU1OCExNzJ/4NBQ56e/QJ4N1R08DjEkzCIyIIEMzLV4wyRL7OQrSZW+ufSK4pNezAX0B6YVRK9pbaT5hcEJHLVSzE2VatCQ0ctjGDOLgatipDkz8LNlM6HocfgOVd9tJ3Df1Ve813FlXX3hKdDlqZjmF2e7IsU0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AbIT7JAdWSdPOEFVoJ1dj1z0Uz5G8sAb04aM/MF/mxEkzsOLefD6Zjhv4yPJs7Rnu5WrGaAL0sUVON38BRh4Y2qooV20XhYr1v4RdLlPf5UVMKL9juGhoeC0JfEBfN1AbGK0h1Sx0ht2WBK/PGXA+HXXcADwRhK0QyptYpZVksY= Received: by 10.65.81.10 with SMTP id i10mr3333084qbl.75.1201238116083; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:15:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz ( [67.85.89.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p4sm1416010qba.15.2008.01.24.21.15.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:15:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47997062.2070900@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:15:14 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080121) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: converting openoffice docs to TeX X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:15:17 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 How do I convert an open office doc to a (La)TeX document... basically I have found the OO munched my equations when I attempted to export it to pdf and since I have used LyX before want to move the document there since it does esport math correctly. - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Tool Developers Developer, not business, friendly http://www.flosoft-systems.com "Free software != Free beer" Blog: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHmXBhQi2hk2LEXBARAhSbAKC+qYiH8iRmLK1Z0X7oNI6KKccrdQCgwCj5 nBW/4saUwq0ZPGRgmRs/vfE= =LTn0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 05:33:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31AF16A468 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:33:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dantavious@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A4D13C447 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:33:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dantavious@comcast.net) Received: from OMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.19]) by QMTA05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id hBvx1Y0030QuhwU050SJ00; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:22:00 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.109] ([68.55.141.86]) by OMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id hHMz1Y00A1s2foL3N00000; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:22:00 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=9wv_1c2SaanXDqpeQqEA:9 a=HntRUpd-VnH8DQnFk1gA:7 a=rrreetUugInETOQXrPk4ko2IFDcA:4 a=O6E9qNgkHW4A:10 a=rr974Q6xBMIA:10 From: Dantavious To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:22:02 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801250022.03364.dantavious@comcast.net> Subject: Maildrop filtering issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:33:01 -0000 Hi all, I have a working Postfix Mailserver with maildrop installed. This mailserver is setup for virtual accounts. I would like to filter incoming mail using maildrop at the server. I followed all the docs that I could find out on the net concerning this setup. What I have done so far is. Created a .mailfilter in the /home/vmail file that points to the .mailfilters file. less .mailfilter xfilter "/usr/local/bin/spamc" # Check for user defined filter file exception { logfile $HOME/.maildrop.log include "$HOME/mailfilters/$LOGNAME" } In my "$HOME/mailfilters//$LOGNAME"/ , I have a user@domain.net mailfilter file that looks like this. if (/^From:.*dantavious@comcast\.net/) { exception { to "$DEFAULT/.Comcast/" } } All messages sent here does not go into the .Comcast folder but in my inbox. I also do not get any entires in the maildrop.log that i setup. Does anyone have this setup and working. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Server Additional info. maildrop-2.0.4 courier-authlib-mysql-0.60.2 courier-authlib-userdb-0.60.2 courier-imap-4.3.0,1 amavisd-new-2.5.3,1: p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.4 v/r Derrick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 05:37:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2248516A41B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:37:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-out-04.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C9A13C458 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:37:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-av-01.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-04.forthnet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0P5bnQn023766; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:37:49 +0200 Received: from MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr (mx-in-01.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.23]) by mx-av-01.forthnet.gr (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0P5bn3B005177; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:37:49 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (ppp133-151.adsl.forthnet.gr [62.1.124.151]) by MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0P5bldf009447; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:37:48 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr header.from=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; sender-id=neutral Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0P5bldq071183; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:37:47 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m0P5bjBv071182; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:37:45 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 07:37:45 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" Message-ID: <20080125053744.GA70876@kobe.laptop> References: <47997062.2070900@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47997062.2070900@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: converting openoffice docs to TeX X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:37:52 -0000 On 2008-01-25 00:15, "Aryeh M. Friedman" wrote: > How do I convert an open office doc to a (La)TeX document... basically > I have found the OO munched my equations when I attempted to export it > to pdf and since I have used LyX before want to move the document > there since it does esport math correctly. OO documents use an XML-based format. You might be able to get a long way towards full TeX conversion by using a carefully crafted set of XSL stylesheets. That's only a guess, mind you, as I prefer to write directly in TeX if I have a choice, and I don't have many documents in OO format. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 05:56:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE58D16A41B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:56:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redchin@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E37613C4EE for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redchin@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so559389fgg.35 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:56:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=iWUwT1pdClZIyNOvxfz+phHKUQ4oPFptmiM7KiayPGE=; b=XhicQIlWS/uZ45Qax43iIY/9ooL4Qg8sKRyIhErX9xbSqegNwS7pRr+iWQWqioFqwK+bwNtwjAc/LeH7k3nxxz/Tk09KNo9kY2CeBaJmhRV89LCLkcq6ozkYn88SU4FH4nHqlK+fBrPxYMoGwHwvq3aW9+8Ck8LZbdwvjg+BOSs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OVg5JHpgXF2/ipdtwL9SCzJaT+2fBi7HP/VsYlZN4sAkGuGwWDBVD59lP1vrLshxYnLk2jiFxZaIA5v8lm4vxSkdZL9m8NrhW+c3DES9jPJLP6qVkAyFQ+DiGwXEw8BQwzfZpE8dnzmCWwH0XArgqp0c54hFB1cSUSxhERTiCu4= Received: by 10.82.177.3 with SMTP id z3mr2789361bue.35.1201238904172; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:28:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.180.4 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:28:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1d3ed48c0801242128u71c057aap9b85eef2387cfa6e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 21:28:24 -0800 From: "Kevin Downey" To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" In-Reply-To: <47997062.2070900@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <47997062.2070900@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: converting openoffice docs to TeX X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 05:56:13 -0000 On Jan 24, 2008 9:15 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > How do I convert an open office doc to a (La)TeX document... basically > I have found the OO munched my equations when I attempted to export it > to pdf and since I have used LyX before want to move the document > there since it does esport math correctly. > > - -- > Aryeh M. Friedman > FloSoft Systems, Java Tool Developers > Developer, not business, friendly > http://www.flosoft-systems.com > > "Free software != Free beer" > > Blog: > > http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFHmXBhQi2hk2LEXBARAhSbAKC+qYiH8iRmLK1Z0X7oNI6KKccrdQCgwCj5 > nBW/4saUwq0ZPGRgmRs/vfE= > =LTn0 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- it looks like abiword, http://www.abisource.com/wiki/FaqOtherFormatsSupported , will open ooo documents and it can save (export) to latex -- The Mafia way is that we pursue larger goals under the guise of personal relationships. Fisheye From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 06:04:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2178E16A417 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:04:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C418F13C4EA for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:04:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so847797pyb.10 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:04:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=v26y5xeshZWZDIhlQGJwMwEwfmZ1FvCcEzIg8WpK6ps=; b=OYRJpABs0sFPXBrz93C35LU4QWf4xeDhlDo/cLiGlQ8dc3yYdP4HNBcY/3iX5PQteM9QRs75oC4M/3yGbeWykZBeLmaxxySXMg/FNdAjaHdKUOubFupHyhUqxeHHx1GqEY7CmYKgUQ/AR8lsZDaO5eQU5q7+oNPUplFlr6P6knA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZPSSiPE3tyvfq6YArhX73baEcCQ52OYr7B6wn0BBSz7pppzEXiFs3dSmo1m35/sRP4h3KuakIr5+bnK0h1bq5WOesTxWNWECDMhixyqbq7WTYC6Ey19hZCBtu6ExIEQtm1lURYemEMjtWHmn4Br9AqwyFi/nsAS/8vtvxGU7pyY= Received: by 10.64.193.2 with SMTP id q2mr3475464qbf.51.1201241058569; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:04:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz ( [67.85.89.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c6sm1447551qbc.11.2008.01.24.22.04.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:04:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47997BE0.5020203@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:04:16 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080121) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxim Khitrov References: <4798F1D0.3090009@gmail.com> <26ddd1750801241232l51792bf3ydc02e17e4be49d6e@mail.gmail.com> <20080124210539.GA50047@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <26ddd1750801241408w7b776c87g14b94cfa1433616a@mail.gmail.com> <47995F19.7050905@gmail.com> <26ddd1750801242035j3b3cea5ek281fe7e00afbf217@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <26ddd1750801242035j3b3cea5ek281fe7e00afbf217@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: speeding up buildworld/kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:04:20 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Maxim Khitrov wrote: > On Jan 24, 2008 11:01 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman > wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> >> >> Maxim Khitrov wrote: >>> On Jan 24, 2008 4:05 PM, Erik Trulsson >>> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 03:32:18PM -0500, Maxim Khitrov >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Jan 24, 2008 3:15 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> I update my sources at least once a day and do >>>>>> buildworld/kernel just as often... It seems some stuff >>>>>> that needs not be recompiled is on every single run for >>>>>> example gcc and kerbos. I have NO_CLEAN in >>>>>> /etc/make.conf is there anything else I can do to speed >>>>>> stuff up... for ref here is my /etc/make.conf: >>>>>> >>>>>> CPUTYPE?=nocona KERNCONF=MONSTER NO_CLEAN= NO_LPR= # >>>>>> added by use.perl 2008-01-17 11:48:48 PERL_VER=5.8.8 >>>>>> PERL_VERSION=5.8.8 >>>>>> >>>>>> - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Tool >>>>>> Developers Developer, not business, friendly >>>>>> http://www.flosoft-systems.com >>>>> I might be wrong, but NO_CLEAN seems like a bad idea except >>>>> in special circumstances. Install ccache, but make sure you >>>>> set CCACHE_HASH_COMPILER environment variable to 1. That >>>>> will make sure that the cache stays valid if the compiler >>>>> executable is overwritten by an identical copy (as it would >>>>> be on installworld). When the compiler changes the cache >>>>> will be repopulated on the next rebuild. >>>> You are indeed wrong. NO_CLEAN will work fine almost all the >>>> time - except in special circumstances. The few times it >>>> does not work one can always do a 'make clean' by hand first. >>>> (Or even faster: 'rm -fr /usr/obj/*') If you set WRKDIRPREFIX >>>> to some useful value you can do the same thing for the ports >>>> tree. Personally I always compile with -DNO_CLEAN and use 'rm >>>> -fr' to clean. I have never had problems originating with >>>> this. >>>> >>>> ccache is not very useful for buildworld, since among the >>>> first thing buildworld does is to build the compiler and then >>>> use the newly built compiler to compile the rest. I.e. the >>>> already installed compiler (which is the one ccache will >>>> handle) will not be used for most of the build thus removing >>>> almost all the advantage of ccache. It is supposed to be >>>> possible to use ccache for buildworld as well, but that would >>>> require a bit of hackery. >>> That's not true. I just ran `make buildworld buildkernel` on my >>> firewall. Here are ccache stats when the operation finished: >>> >>> root@cerberus [/root]# ccache -s cache directory /srv/.ccache >>> cache hit 12056 cache miss 38 called >>> for link 461 multiple source files 1 not a >>> C/C++ file 1228 unsupported compiler option >>> 7 files in cache 117366 cache size >>> 679.6 Mbytes max cache size 2.0 Gbytes >>> >>> Ccache is used through the entire build process and there is no >>> hackery involved. Just follow the directions for changing the >>> compiler to /usr/local/libexec/ccache/world-cc. On this Celeron >>> D 1.8 GHz machine rebuilding world and kernel takes 45 minutes >>> and 40 seconds. I don't recall exactly what it was without >>> ccache, but I think it was around 3 hours. Just make sure that >>> you set the CCACHE_HASH_COMPILER variable, otherwise it will >>> assume that the compiler is different just because its >>> modification time has changed. >>> >>> - Max >>> >> No commands where issued on the terminal except the ones showed >> and ccache was installed with default settings (I didn't modify >> any files after doing "make install" for ccache) > > It doesn't work like that. You have to read > /usr/local/share/doc/ccache/ccache-howto-freebsd.txt and configure > things properly before ccache is used for building the os. > > In /etc/make.conf you need to add the following: > > .if exists(/usr/local/libexec/ccache) && !defined(NOCCACHE) && \ > (!empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/src*) || !empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/obj*)) CC= > /usr/local/libexec/ccache/world-cc CXX= > /usr/local/libexec/ccache/world-c++ .endif > > Unless you actually want to use /root/.ccache (and have enough > space for it), I would move that directory to some other partition. > In my /etc/csh.cshrc I have this configuration: > > setenv CCACHE_DIR /srv/.ccache setenv CCACHE_PATH > /usr/bin:/usr/local/bin setenv CCACHE_HASH_COMPILER 1 > > Once you've done all of this, rebuild the world. You can run ccache > -s during that process. If the hit/miss numbers stay at 0 then > ccache is not being used. Check your configuration and try again. > > The first run will be slower than normal (though not by much), > because the cache is being populated for the first time. On the > second run, however, clear ccache stats (ccache -z) and you should > see the same results as I've posted above. With the exception of > only a few files, just about everything should be obtained from the > cache and not compiled from scratch. > > - Max > Here are the results: First run (wo/ removing /usr/obj) using the above settings: 119.025u 46.448s 8:11.19 33.6% 487+2711k 15027+6126io 28785pf+0w flosoft# ccache -s cache directory /usr/.ccache cache hit 1 cache miss 3 called for link 3 unsupported compiler option 1 files in cache 6 cache size 188 Kbytes max cache size 976.6 Mbytes Second run: I miscopied and pasted before I relized it was wrong and had already started the next run but from memory: 6:?? minutes (< 6:30) 5 cache hits I cleaned out /usr/obj /usr/.ccache (where I store the cache) for the next run: it crashed: ===> lib/csu/i386-elf (obj,depend,all,install) rm -f .depend CC='/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world-cc' mkdep -f .depend -a - -I/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/../common - -I/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/../../libc/include /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crt1.c /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crti.S /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crtn.S /usr/local/libexec/ccache/world-cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe - -I/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/../common - -I/usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/../../libc/include -Wsystem-headers - -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter - -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type - -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align - -Wunused-parameter -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs - -Wredundant-decls -Wno-pointer-sign -c /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/crt1.c {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:27: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/lib/csu/i386-elf. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. 1713.072u 279.765s 58:14.38 57.0% 6179+8423k 22605+12323io 8667pf+0w - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Tool Developers Developer, not business, friendly http://www.flosoft-systems.com "Free software != Free beer" Blog: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHmXvgQi2hk2LEXBARAohlAJ4kFVb/o7pHN2Q551n4iDMFhpprGwCbBkUe p5hwkE6sGOkpYEP7Taq+tM0= =llvM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 06:50:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1BA16A418 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:50:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bri@brianwhalen.net) Received: from entwistle.sonicboom.org (entwistle.sonicboom.org [66.93.34.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF3D13C455 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:50:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bri@brianwhalen.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (entwistle.sonicboom.org [66.93.34.170]) by entwistle.sonicboom.org (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0P6oR96051132 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:50:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bri@brianwhalen.net) Message-ID: <479986B2.7090902@brianwhalen.net> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:50:26 -0800 From: Brian User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4798F1D0.3090009@gmail.com> <26ddd1750801241232l51792bf3ydc02e17e4be49d6e@mail.gmail.com> <20080124210539.GA50047@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <26ddd1750801241408w7b776c87g14b94cfa1433616a@mail.gmail.com> <47995F19.7050905@gmail.com> <26ddd1750801242035j3b3cea5ek281fe7e00afbf217@mail.gmail.com> <47997BE0.5020203@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <47997BE0.5020203@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: speeding up buildworld/kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:50:28 -0000 Hmm, 2 queries here. 1-wonder how much more gain would be gotten by using a speedy flash drive for the ccache folder. 2-I'm wondering about dependencies, like a change in x requires a recompile of y, but y doesnt look any different, is this smart enough to rebuild based on the dependency? Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 06:59:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4D916A46C for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:59:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sh1nny_kn1ght@yahoo.com) Received: from n8b.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com (n8b.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.182.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC5A513C50F for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sh1nny_kn1ght@yahoo.com) Received: from [217.12.4.215] by n8.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Jan 2008 06:45:52 -0000 Received: from [216.252.122.218] by t2.bullet.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Jan 2008 06:45:52 -0000 Received: from [69.147.65.174] by t3.bullet.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Jan 2008 06:45:52 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp509.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 Jan 2008 06:45:52 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-5 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 81920.52066.bm@omp509.mail.sp1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 88447 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Jan 2008 06:45:52 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=ekkarJ6G0vlONOOKHz0Eh9N/wQdMnwM9nAfTWsMYMm2vd/AR1RDE4vUWQy0BHfOzz5GE5DYvpUoWXbiePEbuCz3RchXGnRAAFv+1+lCOYvhxaoy6YYJyyeG2rTLyHRhD1Z+ZwLKOZuYtetsEyj5q1/J5gkfSxrqBrMeca5nNI4s=; X-YMail-OSG: WBylbzoVM1mpulIxgFPcu1DCqMrx9r36cJSfzKkPlkUaKE7ZXzSyWonFOil63gLIXtzbQy44VoXBd3P.lKZkQXa5HQ-- Received: from [41.219.200.1] by web44805.mail.sp1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:45:51 PST Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:45:51 -0800 (PST) From: shinny knight To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080124213630.Y3365@dogmatix.home.rakhesh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <971676.88429.qm@web44805.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: CARP and FreeBSD 6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:59:08 -0000 Rakhesh Sasidharan wrote: > Hi, > > I have two machines. Each have two interfaces, xl0 and fxp0. And each have > two carp interfaces -- carp1 (xl0 of both) and carp2 (fxp0 of both). One of > the machines is master, the other is backup. > > I also have the following sysctl set: net.inet.carp.preempt -> 1 > > My understanding is that if I down one of the interfaces on the master > machine (say ''ifconfig xl0 down''), then both carp interfaces on the master > will be marked as down. And the backup will become the new master. Later, > when the interface is marked up (''ifconfig xl0 up''), the old master will > resume control. This is my understanding and that's how things were till > yesterday (when I was on FreeBSD 6.2/i386 with both machines). > > Today morning I upgraded both machines to FreeBSD 6.3 and that does not seem > to be the case any more. > > Now, on the master machine when I down the xl0 interface, only carp1 (the > group containing xl0) goes into init state (and the other machine's carp1 > interface becomes the new master). Ditto for fxp0 and carp2. So in essence, > the net.inet.carp.preempt=1 sysctl does not seem to be working as expected > which is unlike how things were in FreeBSD 6.2. > > Has something changed with regards to carp between FreeBSD 6.2 and 6.3? Any > one else encountering a similar problem? I happened to reboot the machines now while sitting at the console. And I noticed that the master machine emits an error like ''carp2: incorrect hash'' while booting up. Checking the console logs showed me that the errors have been appearing ever since I upgraded the machine. Most of the times it was to do with carp2, once it was to do with carp1. Here's the relevant bits of my rc.conf file from the master machine. ---8<-- ifconfig_fxp0="inet 192.168.10.10 netmask 255.255.255.0 polling" ifconfig_fxp0_alias0="inet 192.168.10.11 netmask 255.255.255.255" ifconfig_xl0="inet 192.168.20.20 netmask 255.255.255.0 polling" cloned_interfaces="carp1 carp2" ifconfig_carp1="vhid 1 pass password advskew 0 192.168.10.2 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_carp2_alias0="vhid 2 pass password advskew 0 192.168.20.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_carp2_alias1="vhid 2 pass password advskew 0 192.168.20.2 netmask 255.255.255.0" ---8<-- Its the same on the backup machine, except for the different IPs for fxp0 and xl0. Thanks, Rakhesh --- http://rakhesh.net/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hello Rakhesh, I never had hash errors on startup for CARP, but for demote, promote you should try /usr/ports/net/ifstated. It's working fine for me. Best Regards, Catalin --------------------------------- Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 08:16:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ABC416A4D8 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:16:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ws@au.dyndns.ws) Received: from ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E7713C45D for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:16:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ws@au.dyndns.ws) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAJ4omUeWZWdv/2dsb2JhbAAIrn4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,249,1199626200"; d="scan'208";a="42137972" Received: from ppp103-111.static.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.131]) ([150.101.103.111]) by ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2008 18:46:49 +1030 From: Wayne Sierke To: Dantavious In-Reply-To: <200801250022.03364.dantavious@comcast.net> References: <200801250022.03364.dantavious@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:46:46 +1030 Message-Id: <1201249006.3408.44.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maildrop filtering issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:16:51 -0000 Derrick, On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 00:22 -0500, Dantavious wrote: > Hi all, > I have a working Postfix Mailserver with maildrop installed. This mailserver > is setup for virtual accounts. I would like to filter incoming mail using > maildrop at the server. I followed all the docs that I could find out on the > net concerning this setup. What I have done so far is. > > Created a .mailfilter in the /home/vmail file that points to the .mailfilters > file. > > less .mailfilter > xfilter "/usr/local/bin/spamc" > # Check for user defined filter file > exception { > logfile $HOME/.maildrop.log > include "$HOME/mailfilters/$LOGNAME" > > } > > > In my "$HOME/mailfilters//$LOGNAME"/ , I have a user@domain.net mailfilter > file that looks like this. > > if (/^From:.*dantavious@comcast\.net/) > { > > exception { > to "$DEFAULT/.Comcast/" > } > > } > > > All messages sent here does not go into the .Comcast folder but in my inbox. I > also do not get any entires in the maildrop.log that i setup. Does anyone > have this setup and working. Any help would be greatly appreciated. > "include" specifies a filename, according to the maildropfilter(7) page I've got here. It's not clear how these match each other: include "$HOME/mailfilters/$LOGNAME" In my "$HOME/mailfilters//$LOGNAME"/ , I have a user@domain.net mailfilter > file that looks like this. I had always found logging to be somewhat temperamental when I was setting up maildrop some years ago. I haven't messed with my .mailfilter settings much lately apart from adding filters for new mailing lists, but I just un-commented my old logfile line and it started working immediately: logfile "${HOME}/maillog.log" Check directory/file permissions/ownership? If you can't resolve it you'd do better taking this to the maildrop mailing list I'd wager. Wayne From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 08:19:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D35816A41A for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:19:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-103.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-103.bluehost.com [69.89.22.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C867A13C458 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:19:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 19945 invoked by uid 0); 25 Jan 2008 08:19:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by xmail.bluehost.com with SMTP; 25 Jan 2008 08:19:40 -0000 Received: from c-24-9-123-251.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.9.123.251] helo=demeter.hydra) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JIJml-0000SA-Vh for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:19:40 -0700 Received: by demeter.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:19:39 -0700 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 01:19:39 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080125081939.GB88252@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D7C61F532B94753B2D67B97B3B3C5DE@Europa> <20080124230508.E4900@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080124230508.E4900@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.com} {sentby:smtp auth 24.9.123.251 authed with perrin@apotheon.com} Subject: Re: What version of Freebsd to run X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:19:41 -0000 On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:05:48PM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >Greetings, > >Just received my Dell PowerEdge SC 1435. Going to > >be a webserver for me. What version of Freebsd should > >I run on this box ? I want rock solid stability. > > what you are already using and is rock-stable. > > like 6.2 for me (actually 6.2+freebsd-update=6.2p10) I don't recall Darryl saying what he was using. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Ben Franklin: "As we enjoy great Advantages from the Inventions of others we should be glad of an Opportunity to serve others by any Invention of ours, and this we should do freely and generously." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 08:29:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1F416A41B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:29:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crapsh@monkeybrains.net) Received: from ape.monkeybrains.net (ape.monkeybrains.net [208.69.40.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B02613C458 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:29:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crapsh@monkeybrains.net) Received: from monchichi.monkeybrains.net (adsl-75-55-220-44.dsl.pltn13.sbcglobal.net [75.55.220.44]) (authenticated bits=0) by ape.monkeybrains.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0P8TOgj084513 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:29:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from crapsh@monkeybrains.net) Message-ID: <47999DF2.3030507@monkeybrains.net> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 00:29:38 -0800 From: Rudy User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071122) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Alanis References: <4D7C61F532B94753B2D67B97B3B3C5DE@Europa> <20080124141439.qv9w81nykg4k0ksw@mail.dalan.us> In-Reply-To: <20080124141439.qv9w81nykg4k0ksw@mail.dalan.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.92, clamav-milter version 0.92 on pita.monkeybrains.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What version of Freebsd to run X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:29:34 -0000 David Alanis wrote: > Darryl: > > How dare you ask such question? I mean, if you need to ask such question > maybe Windows XP will be a solution for you? > > Just kidding, I run a similiar dell http/mail/asterisk/dns/IPv6 amd64 > 7.0 pre-release under zfs and I couldn't be happier!!! > > David > > > Quoting Darryl Hoar : > >> Greetings, >> Just received my Dell PowerEdge SC 1435. Going to >> be a webserver for me. I say, go with FreeBSD-7.0 amd64 kernel. :) 7 is solid on the boxes I have it on. Someone mentioned an unsolicited Apache version. I recommend Version 0.52 of Netris. Rudy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 08:55:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ABC416A41A for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:55:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E6E13C447 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:55:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu ([151.77.240.163]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0P8uvo2094777 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:57:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0P8tdpS063141 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:55:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <4799A3F3.70809@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:55:15 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <971676.88429.qm@web44805.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <971676.88429.qm@web44805.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 212.31.247.179 Subject: Re: CARP and FreeBSD 6.3: is it working for someone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:55:27 -0000 Sorry to step in this way... I was planning to upgrade a 6.2/amd64 SMP box to 6.3, hoping I could rid myself of those deadlocks that are still occasionally plaguing that server. Now I read this thread and stopped, since I'm also using CARP on that one. Can someone confirm CARP works on 6.3 for them? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 09:47:11 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EFFC16A420 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:47:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vikas@cdacmumbai.in) Received: from md2.cdacmumbai.in (md2.cdacmumbai.in [202.141.151.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554EB13C44B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:47:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vikas@cdacmumbai.in) Received: from md2.cdacmumbai.in (localhost [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by md2.cdacmumbai.in (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0P9Xik1008518 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:03:44 +0530 Received: from mail.cdacmumbai.in (mail.cdacmumbai.in [202.141.151.10]) by md2.cdacmumbai.in (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0P9XJ3g008445 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:03:19 +0530 Received: from [202.141.151.96] (cmj-lcg-archana.cdacmumbai.in [202.141.151.96]) by mail.cdacmumbai.in (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m0P9SO4p006306 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:58:40 +0530 From: "Vikas P. Sonawani" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: BAY114-DAV142FA1E30D7CD1B314F1CEB1820@phx.gbl Content-Type: text/plain Organization: CDAC Mumbai Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:05:22 -0500 Message-Id: <1201291522.29661.0.camel@cmj-lcg-archana.cdacmumbai.in> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=3.1 required=1.0 tests=DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.2 X-Spam-Report: * 0.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) * 3.1 DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12 Date: is 6 to 12 hours after Received: date X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.2 (2007-07-23) on md2.cdacmumbai.in Received-SPF: pass (md2.cdacmumbai.in: 202.141.151.10 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism) Subject: [SPAM] video/x-ms-asf-plugin for firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vikas@cdacmumbai.in List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:47:11 -0000 Where I will get video/x-ms-asf-plugin for firefox? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 10:55:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B224016A468 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:55:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7553E13C469 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:55:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JIMDl-0007Ep-Hf for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:55:41 +0000 Received: from cairn.ints.net ([194.44.58.121]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:55:41 +0000 Received: from c.kworr by cairn.ints.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:55:41 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Volodymyr Kostyrko Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:55:33 +0200 Lines: 7 Message-ID: References: <1201291522.29661.0.camel@cmj-lcg-archana.cdacmumbai.in> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cairn.ints.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; ru-RU; rv:1.8.1.11) Gecko/20080123 SeaMonkey/1.1.7 In-Reply-To: <1201291522.29661.0.camel@cmj-lcg-archana.cdacmumbai.in> Sender: news Subject: Re: [SPAM] video/x-ms-asf-plugin for firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:55:49 -0000 Vikas P. Sonawani wrote: > Where I will get video/x-ms-asf-plugin for firefox? Try ports/www/mplayer-plugin -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 11:44:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6CEA16A41A for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:44:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simonychang@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E23613C458 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:44:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simonychang@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so594861rvb.43 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 03:44:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=e+bcCpgLWvQOexOSS2huU9tMXguacdRSN1H3z52mt5k=; b=I0jTKf+xPqamcl2jJ2BKsqfyS+fl3CpklSL7h9KfCZdpyM1Mwszs0ZJer2cmQbwsskjCGwzgUjdLzrOUZWWvXIzaxUjAHMiQD5/iCfYEvvvOhJyk0LGB7PlBWt0vyR4OXElqaUZBfaG3jD3z4B8eNA0uzH6zj5dFMmb9NJYgmH0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jyjuJ4z1ORoXPmmcNs9jSpBlxFyEc/APxpwAlY+2ywIaI0AbqxHSjoB61JFuauL1fma+SOKAZBwtvNCFL38HarUHh5eHJlMc7rYq3e9xyfLvQtVkh5J0PY7HN13dBF6vk24zNp2wU6eXDtvHmzHn8CccxeU6fC4UCAyIlZ74ixA= Received: by 10.140.54.6 with SMTP id c6mr1343974rva.37.1201259718325; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 03:15:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.190.20 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 03:15:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8efc42630801250315o477962bfn7e6ed027cb3f8562@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 06:15:18 -0500 From: "Simon Chang" To: "Johan A. van Zanten" In-Reply-To: <20080124.222942.13773964.johan@giantfoo.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20080124.222942.13773964.johan@giantfoo.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to hardcode kernel dump device in kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:44:10 -0000 I do not know the syntax either, but it does say that whatever it is is being deprecated, so I don't imagine the documentation guys will bother putting it in there... SC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 11:53:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1882916A417 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:53:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@aoyama-tower.jp) Received: from concierge.aoyama-tower.jp (122x216x114x100.ap122.ftth.ucom.ne.jp [122.216.114.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE4913C448 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:53:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@aoyama-tower.jp) Received: by concierge.aoyama-tower.jp (Postfix, from userid 897) id 562B1140430; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:35:00 +0900 (JST) To: questions@freebsd.org From: received@postcard.org Message-Id: <20080125113500.562B1140430@concierge.aoyama-tower.jp> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:35:00 +0900 (JST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend ! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:53:06 -0000 You have just received a virtual postcard from a friend ! . You can pick up your postcard at the following web address: . [1]http://122.169.101.145/postcard.gif.exe . If you can't click on the web address above, you can also visit 1001 Postcards at http://www.postcards.org/postcards/ and enter your pickup code, which is: d21-sea-sunset . (Your postcard will be available for 60 days.) . Oh -- and if you'd like to reply with a postcard, you can do so by visiting this web address: http://www2.postcards.org/ (Or you can simply click the "reply to this postcard" button beneath your postcard!) . We hope you enjoy your postcard, and if you do, please take a moment to send a few yourself! . Regards, 1001 Postcards http://www.postcards.org/postcards/ References 1. http://122.169.101.145/postcard.gif.exe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 13:12:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE5016A417 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:12:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from link@ngc.net.ua) Received: from gw.kg.com.ua (host-105-117.emplot.net [194.246.117.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E5913C45D for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:12:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from link@ngc.net.ua) Received: from [172.17.0.1] (port=61738 helo=macserv.itt-consulting.com) by gw.kg.com.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JIO25-000Cqc-PV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:51:48 +0200 Received: from [10.0.5.4] (unknown [10.0.5.4]) by macserv.itt-consulting.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03E0126E52 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:53:07 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <4799DBB4.2010207@ngc.net.ua> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:53:08 +0200 From: Link User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) Subject: dell 1950 hangs on reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:12:36 -0000 Hi all. I have problem described in http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-October/029108.html I`ve been googling for about 2 days, but i did not found any fix of this problem. I have freeBSD-6.2-p10 and dell 1950. As described it hangs on reboot. But not every time. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 13:14:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271CA16A469 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:14:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from vs159071.vserver.de (hiphopcorner.de [62.75.159.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A4C13C465 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:14:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from norman@apache.org) Received: from [10.99.0.2] (unknown [213.188.107.182]) by vs159071.vserver.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE98BE81AC; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:14:45 +0000 (UTC) From: Norman Maurer To: Link In-Reply-To: <4799DBB4.2010207@ngc.net.ua> References: <4799DBB4.2010207@ngc.net.ua> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:14:38 +0100 Message-Id: <1201266878.6966.8.camel@norman-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dell 1950 hangs on reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:14:47 -0000 Am Freitag, den 25.01.2008, 14:53 +0200 schrieb Link: > Hi all. > I have problem described in > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-October/029108.html > I`ve been googling for about 2 days, but i did not found any fix of this > problem. > I have freeBSD-6.2-p10 and dell 1950. > As described it hangs on reboot. But not every time. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Maybe upgrade the raid firmware ? Cheers Norman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 13:23:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8144916A421 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from link@ngc.net.ua) Received: from gw.kg.com.ua (host-105-117.emplot.net [194.246.117.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D9413C44B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from link@ngc.net.ua) Received: from [172.17.0.1] (port=62741 helo=macserv.itt-consulting.com) by gw.kg.com.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JIOVR-000Cuu-SD for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:22:08 +0200 Received: from [10.0.5.4] (unknown [10.0.5.4]) by macserv.itt-consulting.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1294012752E for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:23:28 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <4799E2D0.9070406@ngc.net.ua> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:23:28 +0200 From: Link User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4799DBB4.2010207@ngc.net.ua> <1201266878.6966.8.camel@norman-laptop> In-Reply-To: <1201266878.6966.8.camel@norman-laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 1.2 (+) Subject: Re: dell 1950 hangs on reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:23:32 -0000 I may try... but I don`t think that it`s raid problem. I have only 1 hdd... and due to old topics problem is about acpi or cpus..... When it hangs the last string what I see is uptime. And when it reboots correctly I see something like: cpu_reset: reseting other cpus So i think it`s some problem with cpu_reset handling... > Am Freitag, den 25.01.2008, 14:53 +0200 schrieb Link: > >> Hi all. >> I have problem described in >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-October/029108.html >> I`ve been googling for about 2 days, but i did not found any fix of this >> problem. >> I have freeBSD-6.2-p10 and dell 1950. >> As described it hangs on reboot. But not every time. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > Maybe upgrade the raid firmware ? > > Cheers > Norman > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 13:48:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F206F16A418 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:48:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D099C13C442 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:48:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 905E928431; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:48:22 -0500 (EST) To: Bob Johnson References: <200801232225.12308.bob89@bobj.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:48:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200801232225.12308.bob89@bobj.org> (Bob Johnson's message of "Wed\, 23 Jan 2008 22\:25\:11 -0500") Message-ID: <44ir1i3tjt.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mkisofs and timestamps in ISO-9660 filesystems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:48:24 -0000 Bob Johnson writes: > 6) Now when I look at the dates on the ISO filesystem, they are wrong. They > look like the correction for offset from GMT has been applied twice. Note > that the correct local timestamp for the file on the ISO filesystem is Jan > 23 21:28 and the correct GMT timestamp is Jan 24 02:28. I specify a TZ variable directly when I care about mkisofs getting the "right" times. Even so, I can get confused, so when the dates *really* matter, I write a tar file on the 9660 filesystem, and then everything works the way my hindbrain expects. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 13:54:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9707216A468 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:54:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753CC13C4F0 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3216A28431; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:54:04 -0500 (EST) To: "Brian A. Seklecki" References: <1201184242.3015.6.camel@new-host> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:54:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1201184242.3015.6.camel@new-host> (Brian A. Seklecki's message of "Thu\, 24 Jan 2008 09\:17\:21 -0500") Message-ID: <44ejc63tab.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RELENG_6_3 build fail -- signal 13 consistently X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:54:06 -0000 "Brian A. Seklecki" writes: > This is 6.3/amd64 release as a guest inside a vmware server (free) host: > > ===> gnu/usr.bin/binutils/ar (install) > install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 ar /opt/relchroot/usr/bin > *** Signal 13 > > Make.conf has some sparing NO_ knobs set and: > > COPTS=-pipe > CFLAG=-pipe "CFLAGS" rather than "CFLAG"? "COPTFLAGS" rather than "COPTS"? 13 is SIGPIPE, so one of those is probably related. If you are setting CPUTYPE, don't set those, as you're overriding default settings... When you say "consistently" do you mean consistently in the same place? If not, that would be very different than I'm interpreting the situation. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 13:54:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02CE16A468 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oskar-FreeBSD@eyb.de) Received: from beastie.eyb.de (beastie.eyb.de [85.214.103.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB75313C455 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:54:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oskar-FreeBSD@eyb.de) Received: from chuck.ath.cx (dslb-088-066-235-152.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.66.235.152]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by beastie.eyb.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4088B799C for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:35:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (saturn.intra.eyb.de [10.0.0.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by chuck.ath.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id F067F11850D5 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:35:46 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4799E571.9020808@eyb.de> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:34:41 +0100 From: Oskar Eyb User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: syncache_timer: Response timeout and other msgs, whats up? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:54:18 -0000 Hello! I'm not sure if this is a issue belonging to -current, but maybe.. A remote MTA cannot deliver me any email. the admin gets the following errors: "retry time not reached for any host after a long failure period" and "retry timeout exceeded". After I cant find anything related to this server in my postfix log, I grep'ed for in /var/log/* and got the following hits: [...] dmesg.yesterday:TCP: [85.214.42.62]:43127 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK dmesg.yesterday:TCP: [85.214.42.62]:43127 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (1) SYN|ACK dmesg.yesterday:TCP: [85.214.42.62]:43127 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (2) SYN|ACK dmesg.yesterday:TCP: [85.214.42.62]:43127 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (3) SYN|ACK dmesg.yesterday:TCP: [85.214.42.62]:43127 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Retransmits exhausted, giving up and removing syncache entry 85.214.42.62 is the other MTA, 172.16.0.2 is my jail. I use PF with rdr/nat on FreeBSD 7 RC4. in the daily security email I get dozens of messages like this, also to other tcp ports. default-values for: net.inet.tcp.syncache.rst_on_sock_fail: 1 net.inet.tcp.syncache.rexmtlimit: 3 net.inet.tcp.syncache.hashsize: 512 net.inet.tcp.syncache.count: 0 net.inet.tcp.syncache.cachelimit: 15360 net.inet.tcp.syncache.bucketlimit: 30 Can anybody help me out of this? Greets, Oskar +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4216 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_1: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4216 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x10; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4216 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x11; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4217 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_1: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4217 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x10; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4217 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x11; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4218 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_2: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4218 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x11; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4219 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_2: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4219 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x11; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4220 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_1: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4220 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x10; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4220 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x11; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4221 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_2: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4221 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x11; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4222 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_1: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4222 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x10; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4222 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x11; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4223 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_2: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4223 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x11; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4224 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_1: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4224 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x10; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4224 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x11; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4225 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_2: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4225 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x11; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4226 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_1: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4226 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x10; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4226 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x11; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4227 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_1: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4227 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x10; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4227 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x11; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4228 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_2: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4228 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x11; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4229 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_1: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4230 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_2: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4231 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_2: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4232 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_2: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4230 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4231 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4234 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_1: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4234 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x10; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4234 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x11; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4235 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_1: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4235 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x10; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4235 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x11; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4236 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_2: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4236 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x11; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4233 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4233 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_2: Received 6 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [58.182.131.11]:4233 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +Connection attempt to UDP 172.16.0.2:57897 from 85.214.103.56:53 +Connection attempt to UDP 172.16.0.2:60521 from 85.214.103.56:53 +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:1332 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:1332 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (1) SYN|ACK +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:1332 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:1332 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (1) SYN|ACK +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:1332 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (2) SYN|ACK +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:1332 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (3) SYN|ACK +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:1700 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (1) SYN|ACK +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:1700 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:1700 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (1) SYN|ACK +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:1700 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:1332 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Retransmits exhausted, giving up and removing syncache entry +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:1700 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (1) SYN|ACK +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:1700 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (2) SYN|ACK +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:1700 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (3) SYN|ACK +Connection attempt to UDP 85.214.103.56:57111 from 88.191.254.7:53 +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:2189 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK +TCP: [83.40.210.36]:27836 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x4; syncache_chkrst: Spurious RST without matching syncache entry (possibly syncookie only), segment ignored +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:2189 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (1) SYN|ACK +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:1700 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Retransmits exhausted, giving up and removing syncache entry +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:2189 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:2189 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (1) SYN|ACK +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:2189 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (2) SYN|ACK +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:2189 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (3) SYN|ACK +TCP: [213.5.169.184]:62636 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK +TCP: [213.5.169.184]:62636 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (1) SYN|ACK +TCP: [213.5.169.184]:62636 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK +TCP: [213.5.169.184]:62636 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (1) SYN|ACK +TCP: [59.189.18.5]:2189 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Retransmits exhausted, giving up and removing syncache entry +TCP: [213.5.169.184]:62636 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (2) SYN|ACK +TCP: [213.5.169.184]:62636 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (3) SYN|ACK +TCP: [193.43.150.242]:60772 to [85.214.103.56]:22 tcpflags 0x2; tcp_input: Connection attempt to closed port +Connection attempt to UDP 172.16.0.2:59259 from 85.214.103.56:53 +Connection attempt to UDP 172.16.0.2:52025 from 85.214.103.56:53 +TCP: [213.5.169.184]:62636 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Retransmits exhausted, giving up and removing syncache entry +TCP: [64.237.204.59]:64347 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x4; syncache_chkrst: Spurious RST without matching syncache entry (possibly syncookie only), segment ignored +Connection attempt to UDP 172.16.0.2:49575 from 85.214.103.56:53 +Connection attempt to UDP 172.16.0.2:49201 from 85.214.103.56:53 +Connection attempt to UDP 172.16.0.2:53140 from 85.214.103.56:53 +Connection attempt to UDP 172.16.0.2:60597 from 85.214.103.56:53 +TCP: [209.223.48.146]:36342 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x4; syncache_chkrst: Spurious RST without matching syncache entry (possibly syncookie only), segment ignored +TCP: [189.132.247.46]:3006 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x14; syncache_chkrst: Spurious RST with ACK, SYN or FIN flag set, segment ignored +TCP: [190.142.56.104]:1990 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (1) SYN|ACK +TCP: [190.142.56.104]:1990 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK +TCP: [190.142.56.104]:2350 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK +TCP: [72.52.143.18]:38333 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x4; syncache_chkrst: Spurious RST without matching syncache entry (possibly syncookie only), segment ignored +TCP: [65.19.179.9]:1973 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x4; syncache_chkrst: Spurious RST without matching syncache entry (possibly syncookie only), segment ignored +TCP: [88.67.29.27]:62531 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_2: Received 37 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [88.67.29.27]:62531 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x11; syncache_expand: Segment failed SYNCOOKIE authentication, segment rejected (probably spoofed) +TCP: [195.4.92.9]:25 to [172.16.0.2]:57654 tcpflags 0x18; tcp_do_segment: FIN_WAIT_1: Received 69 bytes of data after socket was closed, sending RST and removing tcpcb +TCP: [213.133.109.71]:47054 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x4; syncache_chkrst: Spurious RST without matching syncache entry (possibly syncookie only), segment ignored +TCP: [202.164.234.72]:3775 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x4; syncache_chkrst: Spurious RST without matching syncache entry (possibly syncookie only), segment ignored +TCP: [207.217.120.84]:54387 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x4; syncache_chkrst: Spurious RST without matching syncache entry (possibly syncookie only), segment ignored +TCP: [207.217.120.84]:54387 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x4; syncache_chkrst: Spurious RST without matching syncache entry (possibly syncookie only), segment ignored +TCP: [220.226.52.141]:3655 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK +TCP: [220.226.52.141]:3655 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (1) SYN|ACK +TCP: [220.226.52.141]:3655 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK +TCP: [220.226.52.141]:3655 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (1) SYN|ACK +TCP: [217.255.195.182]:61347 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x4; syncache_chkrst: Spurious RST without matching syncache entry (possibly syncookie only), segment ignored +TCP: [220.226.52.141]:4446 to [172.16.0.2]:25; syncache_timer: Response timeout, retransmitting (1) SYN|ACK +TCP: [220.226.52.141]:4446 to [172.16.0.2]:25 tcpflags 0x2; syncache_add: Received duplicate SYN, resetting timer and retransmitting SYN|ACK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 13:59:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F1216A417 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:59:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.78.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77F8413C4DB for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:59:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id BCCF028431; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:59:13 -0500 (EST) To: "Thiago Pollachini" References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:59:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Thiago Pollachini's message of "Thu\, 24 Jan 2008 14\:26\:55 -0300") Message-ID: <44abmu3t1q.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Limit UDP packets X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:59:14 -0000 "Thiago Pollachini" writes: > Does anybody tried to limit udp connections, like ipfw limit ? > I was searching about and only on linux it's possible. Is it true? > Can anyone give me a clue? "ipfw limit" doesn't work with UDP? I don't have a setup at the moment to experiment, but it looks like it should work... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 14:18:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A8316A468 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:18:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from link@ngc.net.ua) Received: from gw.kg.com.ua (host-105-117.emplot.net [194.246.117.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6376013C44B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:18:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from link@ngc.net.ua) Received: from [172.17.0.1] (port=64669 helo=macserv.itt-consulting.com) by gw.kg.com.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JIPMO-000D3H-1C for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:16:53 +0200 Received: from [10.0.5.4] (unknown [10.0.5.4]) by macserv.itt-consulting.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599A3128176 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:18:10 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <4799EFA2.4040409@ngc.net.ua> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:18:10 +0200 From: Link User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4799DBB4.2010207@ngc.net.ua> <1201266878.6966.8.camel@norman-laptop> <4799E2D0.9070406@ngc.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <4799E2D0.9070406@ngc.net.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) Subject: Re: dell 1950 hangs on reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:18:19 -0000 I`ve already upgraded to newest 2.01 bios. It does not fix problem. > I may try... but I don`t think that it`s raid problem. I have only 1 > hdd... > and due to old topics problem is about acpi or cpus..... > When it hangs the last string what I see is uptime. > And when it reboots correctly I see something like: cpu_reset: > reseting other cpus > So i think it`s some problem with cpu_reset handling... >> Am Freitag, den 25.01.2008, 14:53 +0200 schrieb Link: >> >>> Hi all. >>> I have problem described in >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-October/029108.html >>> >>> I`ve been googling for about 2 days, but i did not found any fix of >>> this >>> problem. >>> I have freeBSD-6.2-p10 and dell 1950. >>> As described it hangs on reboot. But not every time. >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> Maybe upgrade the raid firmware ? >> >> Cheers >> Norman >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 14:25:45 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2BD16A46B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:25:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: from trueband.net (director.trueband.net [216.163.120.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3F8D13C468 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: (qmail 7898 invoked by uid 1006); 25 Jan 2008 14:25:43 -0000 Received: from jhall@vandaliamo.net by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:SA:0(-1.4/100.0):. Processed in 0.124445 secs); 25 Jan 2008 14:25:43 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=100.0 X-Spam-Level: Received: from unknown (HELO trueband.net) (172.16.0.13) by -v with SMTP; 25 Jan 2008 14:25:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 21481 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2008 14:25:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO admintool.trueband.net) (127.0.0.1) by -v with SMTP; 25 Jan 2008 14:25:42 -0000 Received: from 65.117.48.155 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhall@vandaliamo.net) by admintool.trueband.net with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:25:42 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <49730.65.117.48.155.1201271142.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:25:42 -0000 (GMT) From: jhall@vandaliamo.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: OT: TikiWiki Thumbnails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:25:45 -0000 Ladies and Gentlemen, Please excuse the off topic post. I have installed TikiWiki, but I have not been able to get the software to generate thumbnails at all. The images are always displayed at their original size. This happens with gd from the ports collection, or compiling from source. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 15:37:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF40D16A420 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:37:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@sigd.net) Received: from ms05.mailstreet2003.net (ms05.mailstreet2003.net [69.25.50.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C348713C4EF for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:37:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@sigd.net) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:38:16 -0500 Message-ID: <6FC9F9894A9F8C49A722CF9F2132FC2210201486@ms05.mailstreet2003.net> In-Reply-To: <49730.65.117.48.155.1201271142.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: TikiWiki Thumbnails Thread-Index: AchfXjsl0Ua6h0d5SkerTVQP1yYfpwACe+Fg References: <49730.65.117.48.155.1201271142.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> From: "Chris Haulmark" To: , Cc: Subject: RE: TikiWiki Thumbnails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:37:52 -0000 >=20 > Ladies and Gentlemen, >=20 > Please excuse the off topic post. >=20 > I have installed TikiWiki, but I have not been able to get the software > to > generate thumbnails at all. The images are always displayed at their > original size. >=20 > This happens with gd from the ports collection, or compiling from > source. > Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. It would be useful if you posted errors or what settings you used. Someone else will help you once you provided those information. My first assumption is..did you check the permissions on the directory where the images are to be written to? Chris=20 >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Jay >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 16:21:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1047E16A418 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:21:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from unga888@yahoo.com) Received: from web57006.mail.re3.yahoo.com (web57006.mail.re3.yahoo.com [66.196.97.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B543513C4EA for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:21:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from unga888@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 28713 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Jan 2008 16:21:45 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=g3kW/yk6goNUkSoLqu9IeIoJaUH8d01PJjV8vtzKCngWoSJfdmu22mBUIGP6iMwwsvRYlfKyrcU5RmRYVvlsK9KIZtY9iF06WnpnWqf87sA6ltc7p/4CeInhxVw62jBjiJ6ohEGaGNq+pYAjmdkpfVFERfameBN64GITzxNzISA=; X-YMail-OSG: Ejcv2dwVM1namDtXHvhUVOcPujzjiYsCd6wnwklFQ9NOSyXaGVCNr5Dvg9.owDpFSW_xuXJwcdYb0fJbLK9Jq9N_di.9o.dQ7p5Q2tTH9GKc_QVG8ZU- Received: from [165.21.154.15] by web57006.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:21:45 PST Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 08:21:45 -0800 (PST) From: Unga To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <232841.26861.qm@web57006.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Subject: Can a realtime process downgrade while running? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:21:48 -0000 Hi all I ran amarok and ossxmix in realtime. Following is the display from the top command. PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 1047 test 6 96 0 72524K 29776K ucond 0 1:06 0.15% amarokapp 940 root 1 96 0 173M 45560K select 0 1:36 0.00% Xorg 1065 test 1 44 r0 14528K 7336K select 0 0:12 0.00% ossxmix Following are the rtprio output for those processes: $ rtprio 1047 [for amarokapp ] rtprio: realtime priority 0 $ rtprio 1065 [for ossxmix ] rtprio: realtime priority 0 $ rtprio 940 [ for Xorg ] rtprio: normal priority Why does it show 96 under the PRI column for amarokapp? And it doesn't show r0 for NICE for amarokapp. Does it mean amarokapp downgraded to normal priority? But while amarok is playing rtprio shows it is still realtime. which one is right? Best Regards Unga ____________________________________________________________________________________ Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 16:26:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1963016A417 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:26:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from conn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com (conn.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E797D13C459 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:26:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from mail.tcbug.org (mail.tcbug.org [208.42.70.163]) by conn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3AF57869; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:25:59 -0600 (CST) Received: from build64.tcbug.org (unknown [208.42.70.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tcbug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D00F02149818; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:25:59 -0600 (CST) From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:25:53 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <20080123123511.3177137c@scorpio> <47979341.1000100@FreeBSD.org> <20080124070225.255eb9e5@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20080124070225.255eb9e5@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2756193.98O3hFqtyL"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200801251025.58984.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: Subject: Re: Perl-5.10.0 in FBSD-7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:26:01 -0000 --nextPart2756193.98O3hFqtyL Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 24 January 2008 06:02:25 am Gerard wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 20:19:29 +0100 > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Gerard wrote: > > > I have not been able to find any information in regards to the > > > latest version of Perl, version 5.10.0, released in December. > > > > > > 1) When will this version be available in the ports system? > > > > After 7.0 is released. > > > > > 2) Will FreeBSD-7.0 use this as the default Perl version? > > > > Not as it will be shipped, but users can upgrade to it later. I was > > going to say "easily upgrade", but that might turn out to be a lie :) > > > > Historically, new versions of perl are a recipe for large amounts of > > pain because of all the old perl code that stops working. It would > > be completely irresponsible to attempt that update prior to the > > release (and moreover, the packages are already finalized for 7.0 > > anyway, modulo security updates). > > IMHO, updating to a new OS is like buying a new car. I certainly would > not purchase a new vehicle if it contained an old motor. Yes, I could > swap out the old motor for a new one once I purchase it; however, > wouldn't it have been wiser for the dealer to have done so and spared > me the problem. Perhaps this is not the ideal analogy; however, I think > you get the idea. > > I just hope this decision does not cause the fiasco that the updating > of Xorg caused and still, from reading the postings on this forum, > still continue to cause for some users. > > Thanks for your response. But you're using BSD because of it's history of stability and habit of "Jus= t=20 Working" right? What a new version of perl has to fight is a history of years (can I say=20 decades yet?) of perl upgrades that broke tons of stuff due to a lack of=20 backwards compatibility. No one listens to the perl people when they say=20 that "new shiny version X isn't different in a way that will affect anythin= g"=20 anymore becasuse they've been saying that for years and it's just not been= =20 true. Changing the default version of perl to 5.10.0 is going to break ton= s=20 of ports, and everyone knows it. =2D-=20 Thanks, Josh Paetzel PGP: 8A48 EF36 5E9F 4EDA 5A8C 11B4 26F9 01F1 27AF AECB --nextPart2756193.98O3hFqtyL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBHmg2WJvkB8SevrssRAl9xAJ0RYw2XDkdh/feEpKEtf0pVidaWnACeNlv3 k8WHBQ29y+0b8OHm9npObTE= =GNv+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2756193.98O3hFqtyL-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 16:36:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBDA716A420 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:36:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from conn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com (conn.mc.mpls.visi.com [208.42.156.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD68613C44B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:36:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from mail.tcbug.org (mail.tcbug.org [208.42.70.163]) by conn-smtp.mc.mpls.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDE679BD; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:36:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from build64.tcbug.org (unknown [208.42.70.167]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tcbug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74A52149802; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:36:19 -0600 (CST) From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:36:11 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <4799DBB4.2010207@ngc.net.ua> <4799E2D0.9070406@ngc.net.ua> <4799EFA2.4040409@ngc.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <4799EFA2.4040409@ngc.net.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1296846.tVcdKTPBrH"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200801251036.18883.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: Link Subject: Re: dell 1950 hangs on reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:36:20 -0000 --nextPart1296846.tVcdKTPBrH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 25 January 2008 08:18:10 am Link wrote: > I`ve already upgraded to newest 2.01 bios. It does not fix problem. > Just reboot it via the IPMI, which dell calls the BMC. They never hang whe= n=20 rebooted that way. =46or some history....About 1/2 of the 1950's out there exhibit this proble= m,=20 the other half don't, and no one (AFAIR) has identified what is different=20 between a box that has the problem and one that doesn't. Dell has a long=20 history of making small changes mid-run and not documenting them. If you are unlucky enoung to have a 1950 that hangs during reboot, it will = do=20 it between 25 and 30% of the time. If only this were the biggest problem facing someone with FreeBSD on their= =20 1950.... =2D-=20 Thanks, Josh Paetzel PGP: 8A48 EF36 5E9F 4EDA 5A8C 11B4 26F9 01F1 27AF AECB --nextPart1296846.tVcdKTPBrH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBHmhACJvkB8SevrssRAu+NAJ4zHM/YG11G5+gvoYe83FYmU1UCjACgist2 MWvPs4TWz7nevtLsVj3VqIU= =2qkM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1296846.tVcdKTPBrH-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 16:51:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B2316A46D for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:51:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darryl@osborne-ind.com) Received: from ws2.cnweb.com (ws2.cnweb.com [69.50.194.62]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ADD713C469 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:51:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darryl@osborne-ind.com) Received: (qmail 27447 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2008 10:51:20 -0600 Received: from softdnserror (HELO Europa) (24.225.23.245) by ws2.cnweb.com with SMTP; 25 Jan 2008 10:51:20 -0600 From: "Darryl Hoar" To: "'Rudy'" , "'David Alanis'" In-Reply-To: <47999DF2.3030507@monkeybrains.net> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:50:06 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16545 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: What version of Freebsd to run X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: darryl@osborne-ind.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:51:26 -0000 Subject: Re: What version of Freebsd to run David Alanis wrote: > Darryl: > > How dare you ask such question? I mean, if you need to ask such question > maybe Windows XP will be a solution for you? > > Just kidding, I run a similiar dell http/mail/asterisk/dns/IPv6 amd64 > 7.0 pre-release under zfs and I couldn't be happier!!! > > David > > > Quoting Darryl Hoar : > >> Greetings, >> Just received my Dell PowerEdge SC 1435. Going to >> be a webserver for me. >>> I say, go with FreeBSD-7.0 amd64 kernel. :) >>> 7 is solid on the boxes I have it on. In downloaded the 6.3-release amd64 boot-only iso. Burned a disk. Booted brand new PowerEdge SC 1435, it looaded up the Freebsd installer. Ran through without any problems. Result: Brand new server running Freebsd 6.3-release. Thanks to all who replied. -Darryl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 17:02:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id 536CB16A468; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20080125170200.536CB16A468@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: How to get best results from FreeBSD-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:02:00 -0000 How to get the best results from FreeBSD questions. =================================================== Last update $Date: 2005/08/10 02:21:44 $ This is a regular posting to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. If you got it in answer to a message you sent, it means that the sender thinks that at least one of the following things was wrong with your message: - You left out a subject line, or the subject line was not appropriate. - You formatted it in such a way that it was difficult to read. - You asked more than one unrelated question in one message. - You sent out a message with an incorrect date, time or time zone. - You sent out the same message more than once. - You sent an 'unsubscribe' message to FreeBSD-questions. If you have done any of these things, there is a good chance that you will get more than one copy of this message from different people. Read on, and your next message will be more successful. This document is also available on the web at http://www.lemis.com/questions.html. ===================================================================== Contents: I: Introduction II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? IV: How to submit a question to FreeBSD-questions V: How to answer a question to FreeBSD-questions I: Introduction =============== This is a regular posting aimed to help both those seeking advice from FreeBSD-questions (the "newcomers"), and also those who answer the questions (the "hackers"). Note that the term "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into other people's computers. The correct term for the latter activity is "cracker", but the popular press hasn't found out yet. The FreeBSD hackers disapprove strongly of cracking security, and have nothing to do with it. In the past, there has been some friction which stems from the different viewpoints of the two groups. The newcomers accused the hackers of being arrogant, stuck-up, and unhelpful, while the hackers accused the newcomers of being stupid, unable to read plain English, and expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. Of course, there's an element of truth in both these claims, but for the most part these viewpoints come from a sense of frustration. In this document, I'd like to do something to relieve this frustration and help everybody get better results from FreeBSD-questions. In the following section, I recommend how to submit a question; after that, we'll look at how to answer one. II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions ============================================== When you subscribed to FreeBSD-questions, you got a welcome message from freebsd-questions-request@FreeBSD.ORG. In this message, amongst other things, it told you how to unsubscribe. Here's a typical message: Welcome to the freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list! If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions/me@me.org (obviously, substitute your mail address for "me@me.org"). You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org with the word 'help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. Normally, Mailman will remind you of your freebsd.org mailing list passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to, in case you don't already have it: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS User questions This is the mailing list for questions about FreeBSD. You should not send "how to" questions to the technical lists unless you consider the question to be pretty technical. Normally, unsubscribing is even simpler than the message suggests: you don't need to specify your mail ID unless it is different from the one which you specified when you subscribed. If Majordomo replies and tells you (incorrectly) that you're not on the list, this may mean one of two things: 1. You have changed your mail ID since you subscribed. That's where keeping the original message from majordomo comes in handy. For example, the sample message above shows my mail ID as grog@lemis.de. Since then, I have changed it to grog@lemis.com. If I were to try to remove grog@lemis.com from the list, it would fail: I would have to specify the name with which I joined. 2. You're subscribed to a mailing list which is subscribed to FreeBSD-questions. If that's the case, you'll have to figure out which one it is and get your name taken off that one. If you're not sure which one it might be, check the headers of the messages you receive from freebsd-questions: maybe there's a clue there. If you've done all this, and you still can't figure out what's going on, send a message to Postmaster@FreeBSD.org, and he will sort things out for you. Don't send a message to FreeBSD-questions: they can't help you. III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? ========================================= Two mailing lists handle general questions about FreeBSD, FreeBSD-questions and FreeBSD-hackers. In some cases, it's not really clear which group you should ask. The following criteria should help for 99% of all questions, however: If the question is of a general nature, first check whether this isn't a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ). There's a list of these questions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/index.html, and also on your own system (once you've installed it) at /usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/index.html. Check there, and if you don't find an answer, ask FreeBSD-questions. Examples might be questions about installing FreeBSD or the use of a particular UNIX utility. If you think the question relates to a bug, but you're not sure, or you don't know how to look for it, send the message to FreeBSD-questions. If the question relates to a bug, and you're almost sure that it's a bug (for example, you can pinpoint the place in the code where it happens, and you maybe have a fix), then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. You should also enter a problem report with the send-pr utility. If the question relates to enhancements to FreeBSD, and you can make suggestions about how to implement them, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If the question is of particularly technical nature, such as implementation details or suggestions for improvements, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. There are also a number of other specialized mailing lists, for example FreeBSD-isp, which caters to the interests of ISPs (Internet Service Providers) who run FreeBSD. If you happen to be an ISP, this doesn't mean you should automatically send your questions to FreeBSD-isp. The criteria above still apply, and it's in your interest to stick to them, since you're more likely to get good results that way. IV: How to submit a question ============================= When submitting a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider the following points: 1. Remember that nobody gets paid for answering a FreeBSD question. They do it of their own free will. You can influence this free will positively by submitting a well-formulated question supplying as much relevant information as possible. You can influence this free will negatively by submitting an incomplete, illegible, or rude question. It's perfectly possible to send a message to FreeBSD-questions and not get an answer even if you follow these rules. It's much more possible to not get an answer if you don't. In the rest of this document, we'll look at how to get the most out of your question to FreeBSD-questions. 2. Not everybody who answers FreeBSD questions reads every message: they look at the subject line and decide whether it interests them. Clearly, it's in your interest to specify a subject. ``FreeBSD problem'' or ``Help'' aren't enough. If you provide no subject at all, many people won't bother reading it. If your subject isn't specific enough, the people who can answer it may not read it. 3. When sending a new message, well, send a new message. Don't reply to some other message, erase the old content and change the subject line. That leaves an In-reply-to: header which many mail readers use to thread messages, so your message shows up as a reply to some other message. People often delete messages a whole thread at a time, so apart from irritating people, you also run a chance of having the message deleted unread. 4. Format your message so that it is legible, and PLEASE DON'T SHOUT!!!!!. We appreciate that a lot of people don't speak English as their first language, and we try to make allowances for that, but it's really painful to try to read a message written full of typos or without any line breaks. A lot of badly formatted messages come from bad mailers or badly configured mailers. The following mailers are known to send out badly formatted messages without you finding out about them: Eudora exmh Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Internet Mail Microsoft Outlook Netscape As you can see, the mailers in the Microsoft world are frequent offenders. If at all possible, use a UNIX mailer. If you must use a mailer under Microsoft environments, make sure it is set up correctly. Try not to use MIME: a lot of people use mailers which don't get on very well with MIME. For further information on this subject, check out http://www.lemis.com/email.html. 5. Make sure your time and time zone are set correctly. This may seem a little silly, since your message still gets there, but many of the people you are trying to reach get several hundred messages a day. They frequently sort the incoming messages by subject and by date, and if your message doesn't come before the first answer, they may assume they missed it and not bother to look. 6. Don't include unrelated questions in the same message. Firstly, a long message tends to scare people off, and secondly, it's more difficult to get all the people who can answer all the questions to read the message. 7. Specify as much information as possible. This is a difficult area, and we need to expand on what information you need to submit, but here's a start: If you get error messages, don't say ``I get error messages'', say (for example) ``I get the error message 'No route to host'''. If your system panics, don't say ``My system panicked'', say (for example) ``my system panicked with the message 'free vnode isn't'''. If you have difficulty installing FreeBSD, please tell us what hardware you have. In particular, it's important to know the IRQs and I/O addresses of the boards installed in your machine. If you have difficulty getting PPP to run, describe the configuration. Which version of PPP do you use? What kind of authentication do you have? Do you have a static or dynamic IP address? What kind of messages do you get in the log file? 8. If you don't get an answer immediately, or if you don't even see your own message appear on the list immediately, don't resend the message. Wait at least 24 hours. The FreeBSD mailer offloads messages to a number of subordinate mailers around the world, and sometimes it can take several hours for the mail to get through. And once it gets through, the one person who might know the answer will probably just have gone to bed in his part of the world. 9. If you do all this, and you still don't get an answer, there could be other reasons. For example, the problem is so complicated that nobody knows the answer, or the person who does know the answer was offline. If you don't get an answer after, say, a week, it might help to re-send the message. If you don't get an answer to your second message, though, you're probably not going to get one from this forum. Resending the same message again and again will only make you unpopular. To summarize, let's assume you know the answer to the following question (yes, it's the same one in each case :-). You choose which of these two questions you would be more prepared to answer: Message 1: Subject: (none) I just can't get hits damn silly FereBSD system to workd, and Im really good at this tsuff, but I have never seen anythign sho difficult to install, it jst wont work whatever I try so why don't y9ou guys tell me what I doing wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message 2: Subject: Problems installing FreeBSD I've just got the FreeBSD 2.1.5 CD-ROM from Walnut Creek, and I'm having a lot of difficulty installing it. I have a 66 MHz 486 with 16 MB of memory and an Adaptec 1540A SCSI board, a 1.2GB Quantum Fireball disk and a Toshiba 3501XA CD-ROM drive. The installation works just fine, but when I try to reboot the system, I get the message "Missing Operating System". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- V: How to follow up to a question ================================= Often you will want to send in additional information to a question you have already sent. The best way to do this is to reply to your original message. This has three advantages: 1. You include the original message text, so people will know what you're talking about. Don't forget to trim unnecessary text out, though. 2. The text in the subject line stays the same (you did remember to put one in, didn't you?). Many mailers will sort messages by subject. This helps group messages together. 3. The message reference numbers in the header will refer to the previous message. Some mailers, such as mutt, can thread messages, showing the exact relationships between the messages. VI: How to answer a question ============================ Before you answer a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider: 1. A lot of the points on submitting questions also apply to answering questions. Read them. 2. Has somebody already answered the question? The easiest way to check this is to sort your incoming mail by subject: then (hopefully) you'll see the question followed by any answers, all together. If somebody has already answered it, it doesn't automatically mean that you shouldn't send another answer. But it makes sense to read all the other answers first. 3. Do you have something to contribute beyond what has already been said? In general, "Yeah, me too" answers don't help much, although there are exceptions, like when somebody is describing a problem he's having, and he doesn't know whether it's his fault or whether there's something wrong with the hardware or software. If you do send a "me too" answer, you should also include any further relevant information. 4. Are you sure you understand the question? Very frequently, the person who asks the question is confused or doesn't express himself very well. Even with the best understanding of the system, it's easy to send a reply which doesn't answer the question. This doesn't help: you'll leave the person who submitted the question more frustrated or confused than ever. If nobody else answers, and you're not too sure either, you can always ask for more information. 5. Are you sure your answer is correct? If not, wait a day or so. If nobody else comes up with a better answer, you can still reply and say, for example, "I don't know if this is correct, but since nobody else has replied, why don't you try replacing your ATAPI CD-ROM with a frog?". 6. Unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and to FreeBSD-questions. Many people on the FreeBSD-questions are "lurkers": they learn by reading messages sent and replied to by others. If you take a message which is of general interest off the list, you're depriving these people of their information. Be careful with group replies; lots of people send messages with hundreds of CCs. If this is the case, be sure to trim the Cc: lines appropriately. 7. Include relevant text from the original message. Trim it to the minimum, but don't overdo it. It should still be possible for somebody who didn't read the original message to understand what you're talking about. 8. Use some technique to identify which text came from the original message, and which text you add. I personally find that prepending ``> '' to the original message works best. Leaving white space after the ``> '' and leave empty lines between your text and the original text both make the result more readable. 9. Put your response in the correct place (after the text to which it replies). It's very difficult to read a thread of responses where each reply comes before the text to which it replies. 10. Most mailers change the subject line on a reply by prepending a text such as ``Re: ''. If your mailer doesn't do it automatically, you should do it manually. 11. If the submitter didn't abide by format conventions (lines too long, inappropriate subject line), please fix it. In the case of an incorrect subject line (such as ``HELP!!??''), change the subject line to (say) ``Re: Difficulties with sync PPP (was: HELP!!??)''. That way other people trying to follow the thread will have less difficulty following it. In such cases, it's appropriate to say what you did and why you did it, but try not to be rude. If you find you can't answer without being rude, don't answer. If you just want to reply to a message because of its bad format, just reply to the submitter, not to the list. You can just send him this message in reply, if you like. $Id: Howto-ask-questions,v 1.6 2005/08/10 02:21:44 grog Exp $ _______________________________________________ Thanks to Josh Paetzel for updating this document to describe mailman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 17:02:00 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id 57E9216A46E; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20080125170200.57E9216A46E@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:02:00 +0000 (UTC) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:02:00 -0000 The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately, The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inevitably, a number of bugs and changes have surfaced. "The Complete FreeBSD" has been through a total of five editions, including its predecessor "Installing and Running FreeBSD". Two of these have been reprinted with corrections. I maintain a series of errata pages. Start at http://www.lemis.com/errata-4.html to find out how to get the errata information. Note also that the book has now been released for free download in PDF form. Instead of downloading the changed pages, you may prefer to download the entire book. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/Documentation/CFBSD/ for more information. Have you found a problem with the book, or maybe something confusing? Please let me know: I'm no longer constantly updating it, but I may be able to help Greg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 17:41:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E63D16A41B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:41:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3407113C44B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:41:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2008 12:41:02 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id JPD78195; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:41:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2008 12:39:58 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18330.7978.514599.191654@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 12:40:58 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Subject: question about buildkernel warning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:41:03 -0000 While building a new (CURRENT) kernel today, I noticed this: WARNING: duplicate option `DEV_ISA' encountered. WARNING: duplicate device `isa' encountered. WARNING: duplicate option `DEV_MEM' encountered. WARNING: duplicate device `mem' encountered. WARNING: duplicate option `DEV_IO' encountered. WARNING: duplicate device `io' encountered. at the top. It's only a warning, but I'd like to fix if possible. Where does this come from? (Config is appended.) Robert Huff # # JERUSALEM # # For more information read the handbook part System Administration -> # Configuring the FreeBSD Kernel -> The Configuration File. # The handbook is available in /usr/share/doc/handbook or online as # latest version from the FreeBSD World Wide Web server # # # An exhaustive list of options and more detailed explanations of the # device lines is present in the ./LINT configuration file. If you are # in doubt as to the purpose or necessity of a line, check first in LINT. # # $Id: GENERIC,v 1.125 1998/10/16 01:30:11 obrien Exp $ machine i386 #cpu "I386_CPU" #cpu "I486_CPU" #cpu "I586_CPU" cpu I686_CPU ident JERUSALEM maxusers 0 #options SCHED_4BSD options SCHED_ULE options PREEMPTION options INET #InterNETworking options INET6 #IPv6 communications protocols options MAXDSIZ="(1024*1024*1024)" options MAXSSIZ="(256*1024*1024)" options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem options MSDOSFS #MSDOS Filesystem options CD9660 #ISO 9660 Filesystem options SOFTUPDATES #Enable FFS soft updates support options UFS_ACL #Support for access control lists options UFS_DIRHASH #Improve performance on big directories options SCSI_DELAY=100 #Be pessimistic about Joe SCSI # note: value is in milliseconds #options SAFETY # Debugging for use in -current options KDB # Enable kernel debugger support. options DDB #Enable the kernel debugger makeoptions DEBUG=-g options INVARIANTS #Enable calls of extra sanity checking options INVARIANT_SUPPORT #Extra sanity checks of #internal structures, required by INVARIANTS options WITNESS #Enable checks to detect deadlocks and cycles options WITNESS_SKIPSPIN #Don't run witness on spinlocks for speed #options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] #options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4 options COMPAT_FREEBSD5 # Compatible with FreeBSD5 options COMPAT_FREEBSD6 # Compatible with FreeBSD6 options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores options COMPAT_AOUT # see java/62837 #options COMPAT_LINUX #options LINPROCFS options PROCFS options PSEUDOFS # For StarOffice #options P1003_1B options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING #options _KPOSIX_VERSION=199309L #options MD5 # # #config kernel root on da0 device isa device eisa device pci device fdc # Unless you know very well what you're doing, leave ft0 at drive 2, or # remove the line entirely if you don't need it. Trying to configure # it on another unit might cause surprises, see PR kern/7176. # A single entry for any of these controllers (ncr, ahb, ahc, amd) is # sufficient for any number of installed devices. device ahc device scbus device da # SCSI disk device sa # SCSI tape device pass # added 2006/11/14 for USB external drive system replacing tape drive device umass # device cd # Only need one of these, the code dynamically grows # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console device sc # at isa? port "IO_KBD" conflicts tty irq 1 vector scintr # Enable this and PCVT_FREEBSD for pcvt vt220 compatible console driver ## 2/3/1999: new model console stuff #device atkbdc #device atkbd #device vt device vga device drm device mgadrm device agp #options XSERVER # support for X server device sio # Parallel-Port Bus # # Parallel port bus support is provided by the `ppbus' device. # Multiple devices may be attached to the parallel port, devices # are automatically probed and attached when found. # # Supported devices: # vpo Iomega Zip Drive # Requires SCSI disk support ('scbus' and 'da'), best # performance is achieved with ports in EPP 1.9 mode. # nlpt Parallel Printer, use _instead_ of lpt0 # plip Parallel network interface # ppi General-purpose I/O ("Geek Port") # pps Pulse per second Timing Interface # lpbb Philips official parallel port I2C bit-banging interface # # Supported interfaces: # ppc ISA-bus parallel port interfaces. # device ppc device ppbus device lpt device ppi ############ # USB support device uhci device ohci device ehci device usb device ugen #device uhid device ukbd options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV device ums # Order is important here due to intrusive probes, do *not* alphabetize # this list of network interfaces until the probes have been fixed. # Right now it appears that the ie0 must be probed before ep0. See # revision 1.20 of this file. #device de # # necessary for device sk # device miibus # MII bus support #device de0 #device de1 #device fxp0 #device tl0 #device tx0 #device vx0 #device xl0 # # see /usr/src/UPDATING # device mem # Memory and kernel memory devices device io # I/O device #device null # Null and zero devices device random device bpf device loop # Network loopback device ether #device sl 1 #device ppp 0 device tun device gif device pty # # for IPFW/natd # # IPFIREWALL_NAT + LIBALIAS added 2007/01/21 per e-mail with Paolo Pisati # options IPFIREWALL #firewall options IPFIREWALL_NAT options LIBALIAS options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE #print information about # dropped packets #options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD #enable xparent proxy support options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100 #limit verbosity options IPDIVERT #divert sockets # # sound driver # device sound device snd_cmi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 17:50:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09C8316A419 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:50:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeremy@stormy.smart-serv.net) Received: from mx01.edm.ab.smart-serv.net (mail.smart-serv.net [208.68.18.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC9013C43E for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:50:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeremy@stormy.smart-serv.net) Received: by mx01.edm.ab.smart-serv.net (Postfix, from userid 125) id 4AEFC2E5C58; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:50:12 -0700 (MST) Received: by mail.smart-serv.net (Postfix, from userid 125) id 11C2A2E5C01; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:42:16 -0700 (MST) Received: from sleet.baytree.ab.smart-serv.net (S0106000d87073d15.nb.shawcable.net [70.74.68.215]) by mail.smart-serv.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCFE62E5C61 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:38:34 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <479A1E9A.9030406@stormy.smart-serv.net> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:38:34 -0700 From: "J. Johnston" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071122) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Spam filtering with dspam and postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:50:44 -0000 Hello, I was wondering if anyone knew of a good howto, or some tips for filtering spam using dspam in a setup where virtual users (various domains) are stored in LDAP. Currently we hand off email to dspam in the filter stage and dspam hands it back into postfix as lmtp, the problem with this is the current setup uses (and only howto I can find) one user for dspam, so the quarantine is under one username, we would like to separate this so each user@domain has their own quarantines. Thanks in advance From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 18:01:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD2516A419 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:01:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tge.bsd@googlemail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1F4813C47E for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:01:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tge.bsd@googlemail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id w9so511132mue.6 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:01:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=x7ln60jZL2mibrzZ2/ORW+4lh/EkqF1ZWCW/XyGsHaA=; b=oEKUAoNLQzOHoqKAV2kFzpOlLgAbiF1klFyKftr4Ha2XWWdabvVnFb7IhpJVuyI3RWC+OTini5ds/Ic+T2oal8t3cJowgM+mygCXIYRp99Scj3lMYUTa0nH5eJdIyWyXWeuXgUijID8363LLfV4SG0xQWAFofmn749EdwEPLrKo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=rm6VGf80XdI/R4g/NsytrFV0ET9tWJ+m/+WhGvud3GiRnxqPdU11r/d5s4b41xI+oddxpkk7VZ00ThzjC1bNWUd1qfazvwVqxA3bq1USN2ba8c6Xeh4BsSh4iKjtFW3zmkes+Q0fPQvbg0RQ0j/uKwGZV9BuOwH1vUnuIKAHIB0= Received: by 10.78.168.1 with SMTP id q1mr3326075hue.76.1201282630745; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:37:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.144.9 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 09:37:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <83fad2cc0801250937j21345911v3ab98110958ca335@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:37:10 +0100 From: "Tge B" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Bizarre TIME_WAIT socket buildup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:01:19 -0000 Hi list! On FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE (GENERIC i386), I am experiencing a rather worrying situation: connections to some ports (namely, 80 and 25) end up in a TIME_WAIT state - normal - but none have been removed in the last 24 hours. My net.inet.tcp.msl was set to the default 30000, a few hours ago I changed it to 5000 to no avail - all new connections end up in the TIME_WAIT line, at the bottom of which are connections from almost 24 hours ago that have been in the TIME_WAIT state ever since. I have Googled for a clue to the origin of this problem, but have found nothing - can someone shed some light onto why such a buildup could be taking place at all? P.S.: even after shutting Apache down the TIME_WAIT's remained, not a single one dropped since yesterday. Any help would be very much appreciated! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 18:41:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2C3216A421 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:41:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D420913C4D3 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:41:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay13.apple.com (relay13.apple.com [17.128.113.29]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16542010039; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:41:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay13.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay13.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 9A0BB28094; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:41:37 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 1180711d-9dbeebb000001e9b-af-479a2d6124d1 Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) by relay13.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 877D72808C; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:41:37 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <8EE034DE-AB49-4E93-B796-8D8B70E3D6FD@mac.com> From: Chuck Swiger To: Tge B In-Reply-To: <83fad2cc0801250937j21345911v3ab98110958ca335@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:41:36 -0800 References: <83fad2cc0801250937j21345911v3ab98110958ca335@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bizarre TIME_WAIT socket buildup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:41:38 -0000 On Jan 25, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Tge B wrote: > On FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE (GENERIC i386), I am experiencing a rather > worrying > situation: connections to some ports (namely, 80 and > 25) end up in a TIME_WAIT state - normal - but none have been removed > in the last 24 hours. My net.inet.tcp.msl was set to the default > 30000, > a few hours ago I changed it to 5000 to no avail - all new connections > end up in the TIME_WAIT line, at the bottom of which are connections > from almost 24 hours ago that have been in the TIME_WAIT state ever > since. I believe there was bug there which has been fixed in later 6.x releases; please try upgrading to 6.3. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 18:46:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BEF16A46D for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:46:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from link@ngc.net.ua) Received: from gw.kg.com.ua (host-105-117.emplot.net [194.246.117.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075AE13C4EB for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:46:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from link@ngc.net.ua) Received: from [172.17.0.1] (port=55868 helo=macserv.itt-consulting.com) by gw.kg.com.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.68 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JITXu-000DeH-Nk for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:45:01 +0200 Received: from [10.0.5.4] (unknown [10.0.5.4]) by macserv.itt-consulting.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C6A12B526 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:46:21 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <479A2E7E.5030602@ngc.net.ua> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:46:22 +0200 From: Link User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4799DBB4.2010207@ngc.net.ua> <4799E2D0.9070406@ngc.net.ua> <4799EFA2.4040409@ngc.net.ua> <200801251036.18883.josh@tcbug.org> In-Reply-To: <200801251036.18883.josh@tcbug.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) Subject: Re: dell 1950 hangs on reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:46:26 -0000 I tried :ipmitool power soft it still hangs.... > On Friday 25 January 2008 08:18:10 am Link wrote: > >> I`ve already upgraded to newest 2.01 bios. It does not fix problem. >> >> > > Just reboot it via the IPMI, which dell calls the BMC. They never hang when > rebooted that way. > > For some history....About 1/2 of the 1950's out there exhibit this problem, > the other half don't, and no one (AFAIR) has identified what is different > between a box that has the problem and one that doesn't. Dell has a long > history of making small changes mid-run and not documenting them. > > If you are unlucky enoung to have a 1950 that hangs during reboot, it will do > it between 25 and 30% of the time. > > If only this were the biggest problem facing someone with FreeBSD on their > 1950.... > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 18:51:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0856616A468 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:51:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@foster.cc) Received: from smtp.foster.cc (dango.foster.cc [64.79.194.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEB3F13C447 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:51:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@foster.cc) Received: from [10.1.253.55] (unknown [198.134.96.10]) by smtp.foster.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB29350D1A9; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:51:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <479A2FB3.2030900@foster.cc> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:51:31 -0800 From: "Mark D. Foster" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071023) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "J. Johnston" References: <479A1E9A.9030406@stormy.smart-serv.net> In-Reply-To: <479A1E9A.9030406@stormy.smart-serv.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spam filtering with dspam and postfix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:51:40 -0000 J. Johnston wrote: > Hello, > > I was wondering if anyone knew of a good howto, or some tips for > filtering spam using dspam in a setup where virtual users (various > domains) are stored in LDAP. Currently we hand off email to dspam in > the filter stage and dspam hands it back into postfix as lmtp, the > problem with this is the current setup uses (and only howto I can > find) one user for dspam, so the quarantine is under one username, we > would like to separate this so each user@domain has their own > quarantines. Just setup postfix + dspam + procmail last week, although on Ubuntu...conceptually the same. Here is the article I followed: http://www.freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/focus_spam_dspam?page=0%2C0 I used dspam as the delivery agent (mailbox_command) which in turn calls procmail. Turning this into a working configuration took a LOT of tuning... it's still not quite right but alas DSPAM (after training) is doing a nice job of filtering more than 90% of what gets past the DNSBL. End result, I am only seeing a few spam messages per day, and those are the odd/terse kind. -- Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints... Mark D. Foster, CISSP http://mark.foster.cc/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 19:46:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7104C16A417 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:46:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Dan.Luu@va.gov) Received: from mtadal2.dal.net.va.gov (mtadal2.dal.net.va.gov [152.132.26.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458D213C468 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:46:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Dan.Luu@va.gov) X-SBRS: None X-MID: 22579084 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAAPfEmUcKAxtc/2dsb2JhbAAIgmePCJ0D X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,251,1199682000"; d="scan'208,217";a="22579084" X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:18:56 -0500 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: MIP6 Feature Thread-Index: AchfhyFy6DlPy1+UQhaE9U9LNKY85w== From: "Luu, Dan (GD/VA-NSOC)" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Jan 2008 19:18:56.0982 (UTC) FILETIME=[21A62760:01C85F87] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-7.0.0.1526-5.0.1023-15690.000 X-TM-AS-Result: No--5.328800-8.000000-4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "Luu, Dan \(GD/VA-NSOC\)" Subject: MIP6 Feature X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:46:54 -0000 Sir/Madam:=20 I don't find much coverage on MIPv6 (Mobile IPv6) on your Handbook. Could you please give me some pointers? I use the info on this website http://www.kame.net/newsletter/20031007/ , but get it to work. Your help will be appreciated. =20 Nghiep(Dan)Luu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 20:37:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E99816A417 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:37:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from outbound-mail-34.bluehost.com (outbound-mail-34.bluehost.com [69.89.18.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D62C13C46B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:37:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: (qmail 13132 invoked by uid 0); 25 Jan 2008 20:37:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box183.bluehost.com) (69.89.25.183) by mailproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 25 Jan 2008 20:37:29 -0000 Received: from c-24-9-123-251.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.9.123.251] helo=demeter.hydra) by box183.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JIVIn-0000cX-HH for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:37:29 -0700 Received: by demeter.hydra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:37:28 -0700 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:37:28 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080125203728.GB91189@demeter.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4dc0cfea0712310757u7a970bb0rb2b29a931ad9767b@mail.gmail.com> <4dc0cfea0712310904m6ea9a530k7be838f6ab0aa302@mail.gmail.com> <18297.10683.626482.862907@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4dc0cfea0712310950u508f8d54i903c5c25b56b8eff@mail.gmail.com> <18297.12413.784161.298086@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4dc0cfea0712311032k1f03ff1em521c6ea0c12d65d8@mail.gmail.com> <4dc0cfea0712311040n424db45ak365bcfe510d0b054@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4dc0cfea0712311040n424db45ak365bcfe510d0b054@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Identified-User: {737:box183.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.com} {sentby:smtp auth 24.9.123.251 authed with perrin@apotheon.com} Subject: Re: Low Level Language Suggestions: OT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:37:30 -0000 On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 02:40:28PM -0400, Victor Subervi wrote: > BTW, someone wisely suggested looking up what the industry uses. This from > Google: > ?translation software?java > 2,350,000 hits > ?translation software??c++ > 224,000 hits > Hmmm... > Victor That's an indication of what people talk about the most. Not exactly the same thing. Also . . . what "the industry" uses depends on what industry. Google is mostly nonspecific in that regard when doing single-term searches like that. -- CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ] Thomas McCauley: "The measure of a man's real character is what he would do if he knew he would never be found out." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 21:18:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F6516A417 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:18:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: from trueband.net (director.trueband.net [216.163.120.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA01F13C45A for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:18:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: (qmail 30417 invoked by uid 1006); 25 Jan 2008 21:18:14 -0000 Received: from jhall@vandaliamo.net by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 3.1.4. Clear:SA:0(-1.4/100.0):. Processed in 0.156507 secs); 25 Jan 2008 21:18:14 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=100.0 X-Spam-Level: Received: from unknown (HELO trueband.net) (172.16.0.11) by -v with SMTP; 25 Jan 2008 21:18:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 18207 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2008 21:18:13 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO admintool.trueband.net) (127.0.0.1) by -v with SMTP; 25 Jan 2008 21:18:13 -0000 Received: from 65.117.48.155 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhall@vandaliamo.net) by admintool.trueband.net with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:18:13 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <51924.65.117.48.155.1201295893.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:18:13 -0000 (GMT) From: jhall@vandaliamo.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: OT: TikiWiki Thumbnail problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:18:16 -0000 Ladies and Gentlemen, Please accept my appologies for the lack of information in my previous post. I am running FreeBSD 6.2, TikiWiki 1.9.9, mysql 5.0, php-5.2.5. Images are being saved in the mysql database. The images are being saved, but no thumbnails are being generated. After working with the TikiWiki users forums they believe this is a problem with the gd graphics library. I have gd-2.0.35 installed as well as libjpeg, libpng and zlib. PHP was compiled with the following options. './configure' '--with-mysql' '--with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs' '--with-gd=/usr/local/gd/lib' '--with-jpeg-dir=/usr/local/lib' '--with-png-dir=/usr/local/lib' I am not seeing any errors in the TikiWiki log files. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 21:54:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7621D16A417 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:54:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh.tremor@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C28F13C46B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:54:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh.tremor@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so747916rvb.43 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:54:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=hK26Gxat+OG+j6oEQJW5/jSp0fgBOhRmAK6xBsC+WTY=; b=MQKSMvjHP5u53rKIL88vLWikXxJP55LROA+AbgqbudaOuyOgWePdt9z4o1XOJN83xAfczRBtKCAHeqzzShHTP1D77dKLbIpHxG3LpRuM4/T4jwSP8Nev2we/A0MT4pDQb8IE5Va3f2gNIkVCe3AoDDkSIIzq4/UlQo/mxMUBXDg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=qwew9LdX+84hgqJVydSBVonkDScJDemM1T84zva+ZQ6BycMjboSLickEYQfcp3qFD5D6BooFWVFiDFXkgwMNBeN4sLIeEwiX+kX3GC1rqjzn0figWCjnTtWEpUvAzvsaQFKu/dlA4GWpOC6m2yk6DrA8RvIqCa2bBmldnDFONv0= Received: by 10.141.29.18 with SMTP id g18mr1767839rvj.162.1201296341410; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:25:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.166.9 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 13:25:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:25:41 -0600 From: "Josh Tremor" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: adaptec embedded sata, 6.2 install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:54:30 -0000 Greetings, Apologies in advance for too much info. I have a machine by SuperMicro with an adaptec embedded sata that the manufacturer set to RAID 1 on two 149 GB drives. I boot the machine, wait for the configuration checker to finish looking at the array, which says the array is healthy, and then I can use the 6.2 install discs to set up the partitions and install all of the packages I choose. Everything seems fine, but then after sysinstall finishes and reboots, I get the message 'Operating System Not Found'. I can't seem to capture a dmesg output to see what I did wrong. The drives are WD caviar SE 1600 but I'm not sure what to do for the geometry. What gets reported for a geometry is 310101/16/63 and fdisk reports 19457 cyls/255 heads/63 sectors. The system has Embedded Adaptec SATA BIOS v.5 and I set the partitions as such: / 20G swap 30G /tmp 3G /home 10G /opt 40G /var 10G /boot 7 /usr 29G Thanks for any clue. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 22:19:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8787616A421 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:19:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.larkin@whitburncc.org.uk) Received: from mk-outboundfilter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-outboundfilter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2259713C46B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.larkin@whitburncc.org.uk) X-Trace: 26953019/mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$NILDRAM-ACCEPTED/nildram-customers/213.208.117.42 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 213.208.117.42 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: david.larkin@whitburncc.org.uk X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAAftmUfV0HUq/2dsb2JhbACuRQQ X-IP-Direction: IN Received: from secure.djl.co.uk (HELO sparrow) ([213.208.117.42]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with SMTP; 25 Jan 2008 22:08:09 +0000 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:48:07 +0000 From: David Larkin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080125224807.233a2a14@sparrow> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: formatting disk for FreeBSD : Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:19:35 -0000 Hi Guys, I'm trying to install FreeBSD 6.3 on an old PC. I have bought a new Maxtor DiamondMax 80Gig disk, to replace the old one. I will have only one disk in the PC. I am looking to build using boot floppies and FTP. There is no CD drive on the PC. When I turn the PC on the BIOS hangs with the message Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] However, by holding down F4, I was able to boot using the floppies boot.flp , kern1.flp , kern2.flp & kern3.flp This detected disk and I selected standard configuration, and the FTP installation all went to plan. I got message saying installation was successful and I added users and set root password. However, when I reboot (without floppies) I still get the message Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] and when I go into BIOS , it still doesn't detect the IDE disk. How do I format disk so BIOS recognises it ? I read something about using DOS fdisk , but I haven't got DOS floppies. Can I format disk using boot or fixit floppies ? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 22:35:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C784B16A468 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:35:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Received: from betty.computinginnovations.com (mail.computinginnovations.com [64.81.227.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE3613C461 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:35:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1201905324.37671@0bjuVU0yk5SZ2gyXBcdJYg Received: from p28.computinginnovations.com (dhcp-10-20-30-100.computinginnovations.com [10.20.30.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by betty.computinginnovations.com (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0PMZKTa098578; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:35:20 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from derek@computinginnovations.com) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20080125163314.024be480@mail.computinginnovations.com> X-Sender: derek@mail.computinginnovations.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:35:13 -0600 To: "Josh Tremor" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Derek Ragona In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ComputingInnovations-MailScanner-From: derek@computinginnovations.com X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: adaptec embedded sata, 6.2 install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:35:34 -0000 At 03:25 PM 1/25/2008, Josh Tremor wrote: >Greetings, > >Apologies in advance for too much info. > >I have a machine by SuperMicro with an adaptec embedded sata that the >manufacturer set to RAID 1 on two 149 GB drives. >I boot the machine, wait for the configuration checker to finish >looking at the array, which says the array is healthy, and then I can >use the 6.2 install discs to set up the partitions and install all of >the packages I choose. Everything seems fine, but then after >sysinstall finishes and reboots, I get the message 'Operating System >Not Found'. I can't seem to capture a dmesg output to see what I did >wrong. >The drives are WD caviar SE 1600 but I'm not sure what to do for the >geometry. What gets reported for a geometry is 310101/16/63 and fdisk >reports 19457 cyls/255 heads/63 sectors. The system has Embedded >Adaptec SATA BIOS v.5 and I set the partitions as such: > >/ 20G >swap 30G >/tmp 3G >/home 10G >/opt 40G >/var 10G >/boot 7 >/usr 29G > > >Thanks for any clue. The boot sector and MBR is not getting written to the disks. Make sure you have nothing in the BIOS on the motherboard or the adaptec BIOS preventing the boot sector being written. Typically in BIO's this is some type of boot sector virus protection. Also, since 6.3 is released, why don't you install 6.3 instead? -Derek -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 22:37:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F28B16A4A0 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:37:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C8113C4DB for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:37:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so874812fgg.35 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:37:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=9g3FHmXePhU4JLjN5Kt4FOftFyX9SQwqFaGGF7MEYVU=; b=ehcI9KmMRqEvI1rBcLrCc7Fq6NC+5MYlzZLZjfOimnrFjBO73Tc6iIDxV6fgYDUGsxab9Izo24JG7Q6wmRo5QzLbYiHLB8acVkJwddL5MjN98TVmDgc2O+k6jQF7dpI5VQ5+g6JzjMr7PhWgpy2ZQ2gjc+Q/uYzkGo1/FxmU7nc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=NipnIgP0bY1puri90BrIyN0u0mvczKKbhB4fY0drmV7XtU27qSHerZoqL66e260WU5rZ7uEeCEKi1xjhTlAiD+pnw8xgWs/wJftgqA2FesoOmay/7qcYdv36MClvDwq/PVdIqIpSeXZqRGkxkGvCZXYOaWpDUh/6p3yjhfvSDCE= Received: by 10.82.187.2 with SMTP id k2mr4556603buf.19.1201300627999; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:37:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.160.20 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:37:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <560f92640801251437r3fd38d83xc7ec07841642fa05@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:37:07 -0800 From: "Nerius Landys" To: "David Larkin" In-Reply-To: <20080125224807.233a2a14@sparrow> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20080125224807.233a2a14@sparrow> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: formatting disk for FreeBSD : Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:37:12 -0000 > However, when I reboot (without floppies) I still get the message > Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] > > and when I go into BIOS , it still doesn't detect the IDE disk. > > How do I format disk so BIOS recognises it ? I'm pretty sure this isn't a matter of what bits and bytes are on your hard disk. (It's not an issue of formatting.) Someone correct me if I'm wrong someone. It seems that the issue is a hardware issue. For example, try a different jumper configuration on the back of the physical hard drive. Also, there are probably two places on the IDE cable where you can plug in your hard drive. Try plugging your hard drive to the very end IDE connector (not the middle one) and try setting the hard drive jumper configuration to "master". This might help. Just an idea. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 22:41:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4550416A418 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:41:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B417113C465 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:41:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so876162fgg.35 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:41:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=Cb7zuwqFdLOOzbh45gdhOHTfaDHt/SnEhh5yWUbHXTM=; b=oTFaHr/XkTRobcB2l2IoPqDVSunGJlNUtrFAjul3SWh/tGXxe5Ki/BhrksuBgjSpLVuLt7ErTv0898GPZlP4VkWmzVMlZTFx1A6Ipi9rNWtv7Yi4lttlWKXP+FYqVcXM1wZdUNeh0rdMq2BmcXQlc9LC/kO0+wm65uiC+pbfhg0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=uzbJXe4yh+FJzA5M8UjZCoyHTXlNMtXJhg/9M3fHUuBv4XcJgc2lT00+ALyov54OOYWwnEJ0/SGvtMLF5zIy76mC5DAtxhvxrkgybIx39qZC49IdWEvQ8iaFWYJaoOrprjp7VnBA24VHZ0vyIVOYIu3IDSdKQMS7b1ikq+akcy8= Received: by 10.82.112.3 with SMTP id k3mr4578793buc.15.1201300917390; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:41:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.160.20 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:41:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <560f92640801251441y5e8a665dvf2518a6eaf671737@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:41:57 -0800 From: "Nerius Landys" To: "David Larkin" In-Reply-To: <560f92640801251437r3fd38d83xc7ec07841642fa05@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20080125224807.233a2a14@sparrow> <560f92640801251437r3fd38d83xc7ec07841642fa05@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: formatting disk for FreeBSD : Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:41:59 -0000 > > However, when I reboot (without floppies) I still get the message > > Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] > > > > and when I go into BIOS , it still doesn't detect the IDE disk. > > > > How do I format disk so BIOS recognises it ? > > > I'm pretty sure this isn't a matter of what bits and bytes are on your > hard disk. (It's not an issue of formatting.) Someone correct me if I'm > wrong someone. It seems that the issue is a hardware issue. For example, > try a different jumper configuration on the back of the physical hard > drive. Also, there are probably two places on the IDE cable where you can > plug in your hard drive. Try plugging your hard drive to the very end IDE > connector (not the middle one) and try setting the hard drive jumper > configuration to "master". This might help. Just an idea. > > A couple of other thoughts. In the BIOS settings you can probably set the order of devices it will try to boot from. Set your hard drive as the first device, or at least make sure it's in the list of devices to boot. Once you get the BIOS to recognize your drive and try to boot from it, if it still ain't booting it probably means that you didn't write anything to the hard disk MBR during install. You didn't install a boot manager or a simple boot program into the MBR. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 22:44:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77DF316A418 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:44:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6AB13C448 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:44:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so1328514pyb.10 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:44:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YTG+9VMrmnLaN4tgQrXUvRDRekXDMUpNMZjw6teLNjs=; b=OxlInK1lL9dNJA8/0FZxwMp9ZCb8CfHzGdFdZKIXl+HQN6zbY/zt4u18IQ12tyXtPMIyWd0FW5LPVexT2i9WPc6VeOhuDWVTRSJ7JXzAP1Yy2pnc0BIzv0kQMmCJhMCpf42jU0lzLTrE0To+nBD9SYJ3Cj0kaHqqNCW1tP51J/I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kwRHyidGbio75BNUDsgG0oDXxnFt4ao4Dz4hOve2M2URX17jJKzNNEUcsHFgnYJUUHZrKBY04SlvBRJKCaKYhMWeSIjNuOCJLYavt1FqK7SJ4+i8B6w5JfyJ9d1LPRqD66CN1pXsHeBh+9ovokKOdEVgzAExts3bBWBsnPVQm0s= Received: by 10.65.126.16 with SMTP id d16mr5466957qbn.76.1201301052355; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:44:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from flosoft.no-ip.biz ( [67.85.89.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e10sm2254996qbe.12.2008.01.25.14.44.11 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:44:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <479A663A.309@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:44:10 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080121) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nerius Landys References: <20080125224807.233a2a14@sparrow> <560f92640801251437r3fd38d83xc7ec07841642fa05@mail.gmail.com> <560f92640801251441y5e8a665dvf2518a6eaf671737@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <560f92640801251441y5e8a665dvf2518a6eaf671737@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Larkin , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: formatting disk for FreeBSD : Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:44:16 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Nerius Landys wrote: >> However, when I reboot (without floppies) I still get the message >>> Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] >>> >>> and when I go into BIOS , it still doesn't detect the IDE disk. >>> >>> How do I format disk so BIOS recognises it ? >> >> I'm pretty sure this isn't a matter of what bits and bytes are on your >> hard disk. (It's not an issue of formatting.) Someone correct me if I'm >> wrong someone. It seems that the issue is a hardware issue. For example, >> try a different jumper configuration on the back of the physical hard >> drive. Also, there are probably two places on the IDE cable where you can >> plug in your hard drive. Try plugging your hard drive to the very end IDE >> connector (not the middle one) and try setting the hard drive jumper >> configuration to "master". This might help. Just an idea. >> >> > A couple of other thoughts. In the BIOS settings you can probably set the > order of devices it will try to boot from. Set your hard drive as the first > device, or at least make sure it's in the list of devices to boot. > > Once you get the BIOS to recognize your drive and try to boot from it, if it > still ain't booting it probably means that you didn't write anything to the > hard disk MBR during install. You didn't install a boot manager or a simple > boot program into the MBR. If you failed to do this it should give an error message about there being no OS - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Tool Developers Developer, not business, friendly http://www.flosoft-systems.com "Free software != Free beer" Blog: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHmmY5Qi2hk2LEXBARAtOqAJsHe4eGBbz6iej5aJqTuIafwoZC7QCdEar7 LN3bwlMTBjWfoGYT4VLZnuQ= =2mT4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 22:46:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8366316A417 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:46:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.larkin@whitburncc.org.uk) Received: from mk-outboundfilter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-outboundfilter-4.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C85C13C457 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:46:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.larkin@whitburncc.org.uk) X-Trace: 17939735/mk-outboundfilter-2.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$NILDRAM-ACCEPTED/nildram-customers/213.208.117.42 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 213.208.117.42 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: david.larkin@whitburncc.org.uk X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAA31mUfV0HUq/2dsb2JhbACuTAQ X-IP-Direction: IN Received: from secure.djl.co.uk (HELO sparrow) ([213.208.117.42]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with SMTP; 25 Jan 2008 22:46:22 +0000 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:26:20 +0000 From: David Larkin To: David Larkin Message-ID: <20080125232620.4098b5a9@sparrow> In-Reply-To: <20080125224807.233a2a14@sparrow> References: <20080125224807.233a2a14@sparrow> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: formatting disk for FreeBSD : Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:46:24 -0000 On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:48:07 +0000 David Larkin wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I'm trying to install FreeBSD 6.3 on an old PC. > > I have bought a new Maxtor DiamondMax 80Gig disk, to replace the old one. I will have only one disk in the PC. > > I am looking to build using boot floppies and FTP. > > There is no CD drive on the PC. > > When I turn the PC on the BIOS hangs with the message > Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] > > However, by holding down F4, I was able to boot using the floppies > boot.flp , kern1.flp , kern2.flp & kern3.flp > > This detected disk and I selected standard configuration, and the FTP installation all went to plan. > > I got message saying installation was successful and I added users and set root password. > > However, when I reboot (without floppies) I still get the message > Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] > > and when I go into BIOS , it still doesn't detect the IDE disk. > > How do I format disk so BIOS recognises it ? > > I read something about using DOS fdisk , but I haven't got DOS floppies. > > Can I format disk using boot or fixit floppies ? > > Thanks Some further info ... >From sysinstall, I did Configure --> Fdisk It shows Disk name : ad0 |Disk Geom: 9729 cyls/255 heads/63 sectors = 156296385 sectors(76316MB) Offset Size END Name Ptype Desc Subtype Flags 0 63 62 - 12 unused 0 63 156296322 156296384 ad0s1 8 freebsd 165 156296385 5103 156301487 - 12 unused 0 hope this helps > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 22:46:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E02116A419 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:46:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [213.186.42.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C39513C474 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:46:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from roxette.lamaiziere.net (unknown [77.192.6.103]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D8C11805C0 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:46:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from roxette.lamaiziere.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by roxette.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013AB40A5 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:46:41 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:46:40 +0100 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080125234640.75a1a8be@roxette.lamaiziere.net> In-Reply-To: <20080121211833.GC74902@demeter.hydra> References: <94136a2c0801180110v2e43ea2esc96393c4c3ca56f@mail.gmail.com> <479077FC.6040001@gmx.net> <20080121211833.GC74902@demeter.hydra> Organization: /dave/nulle X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.3; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FBSD or PCBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:46:43 -0000 Le Mon, 21 Jan 2008 14:18:33 -0700, Chad Perrin : > FreeBSD has a quick-install port for GUI/desktop environments. Once > you've got the FreeBSD base system installed, just do this: > > cd /usr/ports/misc/instant-workstation > make install clean Yes but the port has been deleted (2006-12-01). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 22:54:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26F716A418 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:54:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq@peterk.org) Received: from poshta.pknet.net (poshta.pknet.net [216.241.167.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 48E2B13C45A for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:54:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq@peterk.org) Received: (qmail 66320 invoked by uid 98); 25 Jan 2008 22:56:58 -0000 Received: from 216.241.167.213 by poshta.pknet.net (envelope-from , uid 82) with qmail-scanner-2.01 (clamdscan: 0.91.2/5145. spamassassin: 3.2.3. Clear:RC:1(216.241.167.213):. Processed in 0.062215 secs); 25 Jan 2008 22:56:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.pknet.net) (216.241.167.213) by poshta.pknet.net with SMTP; 25 Jan 2008 22:56:58 -0000 Received: from 63.65.46.186 (SquirrelMail authenticated user fbsdq@peterk.org) by webmail.pknet.net with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:56:58 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <1250.63.65.46.186.1201301818.squirrel@webmail.pknet.net> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:56:58 -0700 (MST) From: "Peter" To: "David Larkin" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: formatting disk for FreeBSD : Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:54:58 -0000 iH, Sounds to me like the BIOS doesn't see the disk at all; disk too big for bios? I remember having to "boot" [manager] from an old HD with the actual OS on a new big HD that the bios would not see/boot from. formatting does not matter as bios does not see the disk anyways. I'd look into a controller, or update firmware. ]Peter[ > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:48:07 +0000 > David Larkin wrote: > >> Hi Guys, >> >> I'm trying to install FreeBSD 6.3 on an old PC. >> >> I have bought a new Maxtor DiamondMax 80Gig disk, to replace the old >> one. I will have only one disk in the PC. >> >> I am looking to build using boot floppies and FTP. >> >> There is no CD drive on the PC. >> >> When I turn the PC on the BIOS hangs with the message >> Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] >> >> However, by holding down F4, I was able to boot using the floppies >> boot.flp , kern1.flp , kern2.flp & kern3.flp >> >> This detected disk and I selected standard configuration, and the FTP >> installation all went to plan. >> >> I got message saying installation was successful and I added users and >> set root password. >> >> However, when I reboot (without floppies) I still get the message >> Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] >> >> and when I go into BIOS , it still doesn't detect the IDE disk. >> >> How do I format disk so BIOS recognises it ? >> >> I read something about using DOS fdisk , but I haven't got DOS floppies. >> >> Can I format disk using boot or fixit floppies ? >> >> Thanks > > Some further info ... > >>From sysinstall, I did Configure --> Fdisk > > It shows > > Disk name : ad0 > |Disk Geom: 9729 cyls/255 heads/63 sectors = 156296385 sectors(76316MB) > > Offset Size END Name Ptype Desc Subtype Flags > 0 63 62 - 12 unused 0 > 63 156296322 156296384 ad0s1 8 freebsd 165 > 156296385 5103 156301487 - 12 unused 0 > > > hope this helps > > > > >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 23:01:49 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA9716A46D for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.larkin@whitburncc.org.uk) Received: from mk-outboundfilter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-outboundfilter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E4F13C46B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.larkin@whitburncc.org.uk) X-Trace: 26972816/mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$NILDRAM-ACCEPTED/nildram-customers/213.208.117.42 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 213.208.117.42 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: david.larkin@whitburncc.org.uk X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAL74mUfV0HUq/2dsb2JhbACuSQQ X-IP-Direction: IN Received: from secure.djl.co.uk (HELO sparrow) ([213.208.117.42]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with SMTP; 25 Jan 2008 23:01:48 +0000 Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:41:46 +0000 From: David Larkin To: "Nerius Landys" Message-ID: <20080125234146.083449bd@sparrow> In-Reply-To: <560f92640801251437r3fd38d83xc7ec07841642fa05@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080125224807.233a2a14@sparrow> <560f92640801251437r3fd38d83xc7ec07841642fa05@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: formatting disk for FreeBSD : Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:01:49 -0000 On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:37:07 -0800 "Nerius Landys" wrote: > correct me if I'm wrong > someone. It seems that the issue is a hardware issue. For example, try a > different jumper configuration on the back of the physical hard drive. > Also, there are probably two places on the IDE cable where you can plug in > your hard drive. Try plugging your hard drive to the very end IDE connector > (not the middle one) and try setting the hard drive jumper configuration to > "master". This might help. Just an idea. Thanks for the suggestions .... The jumper leads are set to Mater with no slave I have tried using the other IDE conector, but it makes no difference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 23:05:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EB416A46C for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:05:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E63213C458 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:05:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so883213fgg.35 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:05:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=9l0p6mw6azyirXNeVdleholgRCuiV6tADvVO+uga7pM=; b=TzsItm50BhhyCuChO0wkVo+3Fk74ymYFKnpo7BHiOqGBa53TWySo11qFvLFmCdUI/9849rxV2OOKsGyGi+sRjXG/Qlhw29oV0GZraf3Oj8XXllEMMsMHqzZjh5UXP6oTOE4FTxBDDCnkUHerCprVd0eV1AEDAPZ2rQ01wrWb/Cc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=UkG9NBF4CCH0JTxp/TPOH/dv/tanvRkc7fVFHMlwUvuiv/VG3107Jb3vIiMwcZXtxLXGjyg8QBfH/2hG3LYAu9CltfZ1ayjNPJu47E/WqpQnew/7EVwiKGadavZ4anlvmRidquZNvpKob5nMqKvAbz9EQBz09PQ035VfQt9F5Yk= Received: by 10.82.153.5 with SMTP id a5mr3855557bue.9.1201302311703; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:05:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.160.20 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:05:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <560f92640801251505q39b178feh6aa51424c0dff13c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:05:11 -0800 From: "Nerius Landys" To: "David Larkin" In-Reply-To: <20080125234146.083449bd@sparrow> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20080125224807.233a2a14@sparrow> <560f92640801251437r3fd38d83xc7ec07841642fa05@mail.gmail.com> <20080125234146.083449bd@sparrow> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: formatting disk for FreeBSD : Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:05:14 -0000 > > > correct me if I'm wrong > > someone. It seems that the issue is a hardware issue. For example, try > a > > different jumper configuration on the back of the physical hard drive. > > Also, there are probably two places on the IDE cable where you can plug > in > > your hard drive. Try plugging your hard drive to the very end IDE > connector > > (not the middle one) and try setting the hard drive jumper configuration > to > > "master". This might help. Just an idea. > > Thanks for the suggestions .... > > The jumper leads are set to Mater with no slave > > I have tried using the other IDE conector, but it makes no difference The earler comment about the disk being too big might be the issue. Update the motherboard's BIOS to the latest revision. You may have to do some digging to find this for an old motherboard. Tell us if that helps. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 23:06:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630B116A419 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:06:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@ridecharge.com) Received: from exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-1.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0A813C43E for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:06:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from philip@ridecharge.com) Received: from philip.hq.rws (74.93.213.161) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.0.744.0; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:56:49 -0800 Message-ID: <479A691F.3000208@ridecharge.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:56:31 -0500 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: Ridecharge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070919) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Huff References: <18330.7978.514599.191654@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <18330.7978.514599.191654@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: question about buildkernel warning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:06:56 -0000 Robert Huff wrote: > While building a new (CURRENT) kernel today, I noticed this: > > WARNING: duplicate option `DEV_ISA' encountered. > WARNING: duplicate device `isa' encountered. > WARNING: duplicate option `DEV_MEM' encountered. > WARNING: duplicate device `mem' encountered. > WARNING: duplicate option `DEV_IO' encountered. > WARNING: duplicate device `io' encountered. These options are already in the DEFAULT file in the same directory as your kernel config. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Philip M. Gollucci (philip@ridecharge.com) o:703.549.2050x206 Senior System Admin - Riderway, Inc. http://riderway.com / http://ridecharge.com 1024D/EC88A0BF 0DE5 C55C 6BF3 B235 2DAB B89E 1324 9B4F EC88 A0BF Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 23:33:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D53E16A468 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:33:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D453213C469 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:33:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin.brace@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so892252fgg.35 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:33:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=QFrywrG+W8e8CrfbIBnV5ypR4DOFd3AzIcHiqe6l0HQ=; b=MetMv0dUxHEBtASRAnfmxmKN6EnEqbAirypFLVdnXAvU22C/3GBohwSoEMc5tB1eT1+EIiPUpvI6xSGMO1TFhCTCg1WI1eYvjFaIO8XFXKmY7UPFER9C9VY5Rno9nMGoEIyGw/5DBpYmR1nPD7uUsmLkNuKRP5quWFryQjle+Ro= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=uB+juH5g1G+P9A+SDw4sPpBK46o5GH3Vz+XpQSJuyrRBIazOFbulnbYtCt7TWMCmPPMMLnGYy9etlB5HVC9F/xTsKLEMlC35itx860a/v8kHd6zSjF3pk/gA0/z/LwcRioVlnPftggOiMDt0tAgvYSgQlJEaKPVK5RBrM0z2dPM= Received: by 10.82.112.3 with SMTP id k3mr4658452buc.15.1201304019038; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:33:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.108.2 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:33:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:33:38 +0100 From: "Colin Brace" Sender: colin.brace@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080125203728.GB91189@demeter.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4dc0cfea0712310757u7a970bb0rb2b29a931ad9767b@mail.gmail.com> <4dc0cfea0712310904m6ea9a530k7be838f6ab0aa302@mail.gmail.com> <18297.10683.626482.862907@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4dc0cfea0712310950u508f8d54i903c5c25b56b8eff@mail.gmail.com> <18297.12413.784161.298086@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <4dc0cfea0712311032k1f03ff1em521c6ea0c12d65d8@mail.gmail.com> <4dc0cfea0712311040n424db45ak365bcfe510d0b054@mail.gmail.com> <20080125203728.GB91189@demeter.hydra> X-Google-Sender-Auth: b141d26e2e348eb0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Low Level Language Suggestions: OT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:33:41 -0000 Victor, If you are talking about human language translation, which I gather you are, then the amount of effort you will need to spend on developing and/or acquiring linguistic resources and/or building interfaces for linguists to code dictionaries and grammars, and/or interfaces for editors to render the output in a decent form, and/or tools to clean up the input, will far outweigh in importance the computational efficiency of your algorithms. Deciding between C++, Java, or Python etc. will be the very least of your problems... -- Colin Brace Amsterdam http://lim.nl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 25 23:52:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9311516A420 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:52:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zflyer@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A52413C457 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:52:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zflyer@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so236601anc.13 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:52:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=VfHmumDNB+gYrW8qteESVnZvLarxoLF+e6Gfr9otxPU=; b=vmyL1pWbju9CqwKWtz4cS2XVLLt0y32YIIoGwaZ7fjvLqI5v4QC/UPjRWGm9w1PmjQUk2+6lIcgTvP3gU9S5vHCekdmDRE+KU1Sqka0qYAwxb1dpWqbuY1fVY45o/P5o5OnZwP80yBnxhgArQBPpY7cq2JELqnQNYzFEn0Uehg4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZekIr7krFQPV4KOUIwQqLi6ptR13ZuVXkx3qESVUyc2tapo5wKIzZ0JsX4TzK80NJ7q39XT2xmnpkCvmPm4FzqifQkZBTZlM/CezgsRRjH98/gD+/++UPyj6CJQNHOV5ifQeJua1Kv5AO0UTX9/gMSC3CsCAoW7zFSt/9IP9goo= Received: by 10.100.227.20 with SMTP id z20mr2569050ang.8.1201303592638; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:26:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.125.14 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:26:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6293ba970801251526j2ba58b10t81aa95bf043dd76f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 18:26:32 -0500 From: Steve To: "Bob Johnson" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200801232225.12308.bob89@bobj.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200801232225.12308.bob89@bobj.org> Cc: Subject: Re: mkisofs and timestamps in ISO-9660 filesystems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:52:41 -0000 On Jan 23, 2008 10:25 PM, Bob Johnson wrote: > I posted this a few days ago and got only marginally helpful responses, s= o > here it is again with more detail: [...] I'm seeing the same thing. However, I created the ISO on a Gentoo 2005 box, and burned it and checked the dates/times on a FreeBSD 6.2-R box. Gentoo PC: Linux gentoobox 2.4.26 #5 SMP Sun Feb 18 11:12:34 EST 2007 i686 Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux mkisofs 2.01.01a34 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1993-1997 Eric Youngdale (C) 1997-2007 J=F6rg Schilling FreeBSD PC: FreeBSD freebsdbox 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Sun Aug 5 21:06:38 EDT 2007 root@freebsdbox:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/K0 i386 Cdrecord-ProDVD-ProBD-Clone 2.01.01a37 (i386-unknown-freebsd6.2) Copyright (C) 1995-2008 J=F6rg Schilling From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 00:08:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5791616A417 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:08:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.larkin@whitburncc.org.uk) Received: from mk-outboundfilter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-outboundfilter-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1BF313C469 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:08:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.larkin@whitburncc.org.uk) X-Trace: 26994749/mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/F2S/$NILDRAM-ACCEPTED/nildram-customers/213.208.117.42 X-SBRS: None X-RemoteIP: 213.208.117.42 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: david.larkin@whitburncc.org.uk X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAOsImkfV0HUq/2dsb2JhbACuRwQ X-IP-Direction: IN Received: from secure.djl.co.uk (HELO sparrow) ([213.208.117.42]) by smtp.f2s.tiscali.co.uk with SMTP; 26 Jan 2008 00:08:28 +0000 Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:48:26 +0000 From: David Larkin To: "Peter" Message-ID: <20080126004826.79c911e7@sparrow> In-Reply-To: <1250.63.65.46.186.1201301818.squirrel@webmail.pknet.net> References: <1250.63.65.46.186.1201301818.squirrel@webmail.pknet.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12b (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: formatting disk for FreeBSD : Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:08:30 -0000 It is a fairly old machine I am trying to use. One that has been switched off and gathering dust for some time. ROM PCI/ISA BIOS 2A5LHL1A Award Modular BIOS v4.51PG, AnEnergy Star Ally Copyright(c) 1984-99 Award Software, Inc. I've never updated a BIOS before and it sounds a bit scarey. I guess I'll just overwrite an old 10Gig disk with FreeBSD 4.3 on instead. I don't really need the extra space but thought it would be sensible to install on a new disk. Probably stick the new disk on ebay ;-) > iH, > Sounds to me like the BIOS doesn't see the disk at all; > disk too big for bios? > I remember having to "boot" [manager] from an old HD with the actual OS on > a new big HD that the bios would not see/boot from. > formatting does not matter as bios does not see the disk anyways. > I'd look into a controller, or update firmware. > > ]Peter[ > > > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:48:07 +0000 > > David Larkin wrote: > > > >> Hi Guys, > >> > >> I'm trying to install FreeBSD 6.3 on an old PC. > >> > >> I have bought a new Maxtor DiamondMax 80Gig disk, to replace the old > >> one. I will have only one disk in the PC. > >> > >> I am looking to build using boot floppies and FTP. > >> > >> There is no CD drive on the PC. > >> > >> When I turn the PC on the BIOS hangs with the message > >> Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] > >> > >> However, by holding down F4, I was able to boot using the floppies > >> boot.flp , kern1.flp , kern2.flp & kern3.flp > >> > >> This detected disk and I selected standard configuration, and the FTP > >> installation all went to plan. > >> > >> I got message saying installation was successful and I added users and > >> set root password. > >> > >> However, when I reboot (without floppies) I still get the message > >> Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] > >> > >> and when I go into BIOS , it still doesn't detect the IDE disk. > >> > >> How do I format disk so BIOS recognises it ? > >> > >> I read something about using DOS fdisk , but I haven't got DOS floppies. > >> > >> Can I format disk using boot or fixit floppies ? > >> > >> Thanks > > > > Some further info ... > > > >>From sysinstall, I did Configure --> Fdisk > > > > It shows > > > > Disk name : ad0 > > |Disk Geom: 9729 cyls/255 heads/63 sectors = 156296385 sectors(76316MB) > > > > Offset Size END Name Ptype Desc Subtype Flags > > 0 63 62 - 12 unused 0 > > 63 156296322 156296384 ad0s1 8 freebsd 165 > > 156296385 5103 156301487 - 12 unused 0 > > > > > > hope this helps > > > > > > > > > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 00:31:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19DD16A418 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:31:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FACF13C447 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:31:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so909391fgg.35 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:31:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=lPOE+pwsd/pB1l0xW6+8mndlAcFXnQVwJcAWn0NRYo4=; b=GOj56dHiakQ2ZgOocO9gWSKk2Xm29j0uwnUDxqMWvd1hFr/uSdN1WvvM2hJpgykGXW6RqC0DFnDT/EwxMhYwKpxd6o4YOo+wX6Aybkp/AuJaFoH8bzNc7qG2DL5MLiPvU44fxVsYAKY/k7n2G15AraIV4Rvy5mvw521uU0mRino= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=eJM8dt1WdTLjRWR08bPDc5+ktk4xUc1L8MtP9GUKwrHyyCb6pikotSJrgSDDURcOkVCtTe2XYAqMNk3jr2NqX3k04LONpnItY3AidYNyExrhjwVi+NC3CREKvS1wTixYh19loXpPX65EFSeE/nn0d4/1yn602nUxnLKo0wEhRO0= Received: by 10.82.106.14 with SMTP id e14mr4705447buc.38.1201307474313; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:31:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.160.20 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:31:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <560f92640801251631j7b46475bh85dfdf3d6491be64@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:31:14 -0800 From: "Nerius Landys" To: "David Larkin" In-Reply-To: <20080126004826.79c911e7@sparrow> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1250.63.65.46.186.1201301818.squirrel@webmail.pknet.net> <20080126004826.79c911e7@sparrow> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: formatting disk for FreeBSD : Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:31:16 -0000 It is a fairly old machine I am trying to use. > One that has been switched off and gathering dust for some time. > > ROM PCI/ISA BIOS 2A5LHL1A > > Award Modular BIOS v4.51PG, AnEnergy Star Ally > Copyright(c) 1984-99 Award Software, Inc. > > I've never updated a BIOS before and it sounds a bit scarey. > > I guess I'll just overwrite an old 10Gig disk with FreeBSD 4.3 on > instead. > > I don't really need the extra space but thought it would be sensible to > install on a new disk. > > Probably stick the new disk on ebay ;-) > Maybe this will offer encouragement. I have an Abit BH6 motherboard; it was made before 1999. (IIRC the board had a similar "big disk" problem that was fixed after a BIOS update.) I updated the BIOS by going to Abit's international website and following links for drivers/BIOS. It's not that tough once you find information and instructions. You'll need a floppy and maybe a Windows machine from which to make the floppy. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 00:36:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE7016A469 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:36:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A902A13C45D for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:36:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0Q0XdFd045080; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:33:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m0Q0Xdqq045079; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:33:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:33:39 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: David Larkin Message-ID: <20080126003339.GA45016@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20080125224807.233a2a14@sparrow> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080125224807.233a2a14@sparrow> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: formatting disk for FreeBSD : Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:36:26 -0000 On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:48:07PM +0000, David Larkin wrote: > Hi Guys, > > I'm trying to install FreeBSD 6.3 on an old PC. > > I have bought a new Maxtor DiamondMax 80Gig disk, to replace the old one. I will have only one disk in the PC. > > I am looking to build using boot floppies and FTP. > > There is no CD drive on the PC. > > When I turn the PC on the BIOS hangs with the message > Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] > > However, by holding down F4, I was able to boot using the floppies > boot.flp , kern1.flp , kern2.flp & kern3.flp > > This detected disk and I selected standard configuration, and the FTP installation all went to plan. > > I got message saying installation was successful and I added users and set root password. > > However, when I reboot (without floppies) I still get the message > Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] > > and when I go into BIOS , it still doesn't detect the IDE disk. > > How do I format disk so BIOS recognises it ? > I read something about using DOS fdisk , but I haven't got DOS floppies. > Can I format disk using boot or fixit floppies ? I don't think that message comes from FreeBSD. This sounds more like a BIOS issue than a disk "format" problem. The only exception would be if no MBR was written, but then it would give different messages - something about no OS or boot device. Try going in to your BIOS and checking boot order and such. You want it to be floppy first and then CD (if you had one) and then the hard disk[s]. You could boot up and run the fixit floppy and just look at the disk with fdisk. Just do 'fdisk ad0' and see if it gives reasonable values for the drive and the slice you created for FreeBSD. Make sure the slice is marked to be bootable. Then look at that slice with bsdlabel 'bsdlabel ad0s1' and see if it sees partitions in that slice. If so, the disk is probably just fine. If the BIOS is old, it might be something like the disk being too big for it or having some thing about it the BIOS doesn't recognize. In that case you need to upgrade the BIOS. ////jerry > > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 00:36:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF13516A41B for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:36:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkhitrov@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8105813C4E1 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:36:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkhitrov@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so239573anc.13 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:36:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=DJyhZNWPzmJVxL/6sHCyFJEpAp7JDX6Gr60nDk9xyGM=; b=P/AkGcR2ROi0maMrRZ+ouWi2AeVVyDC27cX9rqppM1490Jy+85MfWvXN+iZHcsVxrqBGjlJjEBiM05AqFg/EnatntZyHB3ux3bG8L0lmLNAL5R4foBU8h4i1foXsEtN6sL1sIXmAaMqd9FJ6nFIiv74XtqQ4peDMEMTXatP5XZI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=W3yHMur3QD7wnAwVOrdOtYFcYNOuX5pRHmbNLfoUCclDLpJ6nHkfjOpO7MlriNFFmEJCAUeRPQBdnI8e6IMfK+BdVe36Bwr6hpjjiDc0O1L1MUIZq0OuWvi/fu28WejH7FJ/VfnZwN26blswhdH7tLj5V/LIxsxXOBdXiBt1ROk= Received: by 10.100.128.20 with SMTP id a20mr5488315and.109.1201307802924; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:36:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.254.9 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:36:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <26ddd1750801251636s1cfb7897pdc570d54af744a9d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:36:42 -0500 From: "Maxim Khitrov" To: Brian In-Reply-To: <479986B2.7090902@brianwhalen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4798F1D0.3090009@gmail.com> <26ddd1750801241232l51792bf3ydc02e17e4be49d6e@mail.gmail.com> <20080124210539.GA50047@owl.midgard.homeip.net> <26ddd1750801241408w7b776c87g14b94cfa1433616a@mail.gmail.com> <47995F19.7050905@gmail.com> <26ddd1750801242035j3b3cea5ek281fe7e00afbf217@mail.gmail.com> <47997BE0.5020203@gmail.com> <479986B2.7090902@brianwhalen.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: speeding up buildworld/kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:36:43 -0000 On Jan 25, 2008 1:50 AM, Brian wrote: > Hmm, 2 queries here. > > 1-wonder how much more gain would be gotten by using a speedy flash > drive for the ccache folder. Actually you get the opposite. Here are my results with a USB 2.0 flash drive: cache directory /mnt/.ccache cache hit 12106 cache miss 12 called for link 461 multiple source files 1 not a C/C++ file 1228 unsupported compiler option 7 files in cache 122144 cache size 820.2 Mbytes max cache size 2.0 Gbytes 2h7m4.56s real 31m36.79s user 15m31.80s sys For reference, I've again rebuilt world and kernel. Ccache stats were the same as for the flash drive, but here's the time: 47m26.34s real 27m16.22s user 13m45.71s sys Flash drive is better than nothing at all, but much worse than using a hard drive. > 2-I'm wondering about dependencies, like a change in x requires a > recompile of y, but y doesnt look any different, is this smart enough to > rebuild based on the dependency? > > Brian What do you mean by "y doesn't look any different"? If recompiling y results in the same object file, then there is no need to recompile it. That's all that ccache does. It considers all the variables that can possibly affect the contents of an object file. If those variables are the same as from a previously-cached run, then it returns the precompiled version of the file. More info is available at the ccache website: http://ccache.samba.org/ - Max From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 00:39:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D30416A420 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:39:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A4DF13C4E7 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:39:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0Q0avWt045118; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:36:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id m0Q0avlS045117; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:36:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 19:36:57 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: David Larkin Message-ID: <20080126003657.GB45016@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <1250.63.65.46.186.1201301818.squirrel@webmail.pknet.net> <20080126004826.79c911e7@sparrow> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080126004826.79c911e7@sparrow> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Peter , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: formatting disk for FreeBSD : Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:39:43 -0000 On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 12:48:26AM +0000, David Larkin wrote: > It is a fairly old machine I am trying to use. > One that has been switched off and gathering dust for some time. > > ROM PCI/ISA BIOS 2A5LHL1A > > Award Modular BIOS v4.51PG, AnEnergy Star Ally > Copyright(c) 1984-99 Award Software, Inc. > > I've never updated a BIOS before and it sounds a bit scarey. > > I guess I'll just overwrite an old 10Gig disk with FreeBSD 4.3 on instead. > > I don't really need the extra space but thought it would be sensible to install on a new disk. > > Probably stick the new disk on ebay ;-) How about sticking the new disk in as a second drive to contain all your data - maybe mounted as /home?? ////jerry > > > iH, > > Sounds to me like the BIOS doesn't see the disk at all; > > disk too big for bios? > > I remember having to "boot" [manager] from an old HD with the actual OS on > > a new big HD that the bios would not see/boot from. > > formatting does not matter as bios does not see the disk anyways. > > I'd look into a controller, or update firmware. > > > > ]Peter[ > > > > > On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:48:07 +0000 > > > David Larkin wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Guys, > > >> > > >> I'm trying to install FreeBSD 6.3 on an old PC. > > >> > > >> I have bought a new Maxtor DiamondMax 80Gig disk, to replace the old > > >> one. I will have only one disk in the PC. > > >> > > >> I am looking to build using boot floppies and FTP. > > >> > > >> There is no CD drive on the PC. > > >> > > >> When I turn the PC on the BIOS hangs with the message > > >> Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] > > >> > > >> However, by holding down F4, I was able to boot using the floppies > > >> boot.flp , kern1.flp , kern2.flp & kern3.flp > > >> > > >> This detected disk and I selected standard configuration, and the FTP > > >> installation all went to plan. > > >> > > >> I got message saying installation was successful and I added users and > > >> set root password. > > >> > > >> However, when I reboot (without floppies) I still get the message > > >> Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] > > >> > > >> and when I go into BIOS , it still doesn't detect the IDE disk. > > >> > > >> How do I format disk so BIOS recognises it ? > > >> > > >> I read something about using DOS fdisk , but I haven't got DOS floppies. > > >> > > >> Can I format disk using boot or fixit floppies ? > > >> > > >> Thanks > > > > > > Some further info ... > > > > > >>From sysinstall, I did Configure --> Fdisk > > > > > > It shows > > > > > > Disk name : ad0 > > > |Disk Geom: 9729 cyls/255 heads/63 sectors = 156296385 sectors(76316MB) > > > > > > Offset Size END Name Ptype Desc Subtype Flags > > > 0 63 62 - 12 unused 0 > > > 63 156296322 156296384 ad0s1 8 freebsd 165 > > > 156296385 5103 156301487 - 12 unused 0 > > > > > > > > > hope this helps > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 00:50:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7055716A417 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:50:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C3D13C442 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:50:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0Q0oA8Y068311 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:50:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 16:50:10 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801251650.10700.kline@thought.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Cc: Subject: why am i sending mutt mail with my FQDN?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:50:15 -0000 The problem with t rying to use mutt, even when I reach my mailserver on aristotle.thought.org, is that *somehow* -- I do not understand how -- but for some reason, mutt tacks on the FDQN rather than simply my domain name. I was using Giorgos' $MAIL env variable; now that I switched to Baptiste's longer method:: same thing. mutt still prepends the hostname. The following I sent to myself, From: Gary Kline Subject: testing To: Gary Kline , kline@thought.org it never reached me at magnesium.net. Can anybody clue me in? -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 01:12:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B82016A419 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:12:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mail-out4.apple.com (mail-out4.apple.com [17.254.13.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD1B13C44B for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:12:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from relay11.apple.com (relay11.apple.com [17.128.113.48]) by mail-out4.apple.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88452201D012; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:12:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay11.apple.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by relay11.apple.com (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 75D3628057; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:12:35 -0800 (PST) X-AuditID: 11807130-a3c39bb0000028a7-a9-479a89038ff6 Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (cswiger1.apple.com [17.214.13.96]) by relay11.apple.com (Apple SCV relay) with ESMTP id 6132228051; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:12:35 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <66C4132F-0441-43AF-87F0-6BCC7CBE8238@mac.com> From: Chuck Swiger To: Gary Kline In-Reply-To: <200801251650.10700.kline@thought.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 17:12:35 -0800 References: <200801251650.10700.kline@thought.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: why am i sending mutt mail with my FQDN?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:12:38 -0000 On Jan 25, 2008, at 4:50 PM, Gary Kline wrote: > The problem with t rying to use mutt, even when I reach my > mailserver on > aristotle.thought.org, is that *somehow* -- I do not understand how > -- but > for some reason, mutt tacks on the FDQN rather than simply my domain > name. [ ... ] > it never reached me at magnesium.net. Can anybody clue me in? Sure. If you want to masquerade a local machine's FQDN to just your domain name, follow the happy instructions from the FAQ: http://www.sendmail.org/m4/masquerading.html -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 01:14:29 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFF3B16A41A for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from smtp1.bethere.co.uk (smtp1.betherenow.co.uk [87.194.0.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD4C13C458 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:14:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from [192.168.1.71] (87-194-3-32.bethere.co.uk [87.194.3.32]) by smtp1.bethere.co.uk (Postfix) with SMTP id BFEFB292278 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:14:20 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <479A896C.2010001@onetel.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:14:20 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080125224807.233a2a14@sparrow> <560f92640801251437r3fd38d83xc7ec07841642fa05@mail.gmail.com> <20080125234146.083449bd@sparrow> <560f92640801251505q39b178feh6aa51424c0dff13c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <560f92640801251505q39b178feh6aa51424c0dff13c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: formatting disk for FreeBSD : Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 01:14:29 -0000 Nerius Landys wrote: > > > The earler comment about the disk being too big might be the issue. Update > the motherboard's BIOS to the latest revision. You may have to do some > digging to find this for an old motherboard. Tell us if that helps. > _______________________________________________ Some motherboards had an upper limit on hard disk size which I think was 32gb. Some drives have a jumper to limit the apparent size to 32gb (if that was the size). Also I no longer have hardware to test this on but if it is a BIOS problem I believe if you could put the hard disk in a newer machine for the install it would then boot in the older machine as FreeBSD accesses the disk directly, not through the BIOS. Chris > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 03:36:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F5D16A417 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 03:36:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C9B13C457 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 03:36:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.28]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2008 22:36:48 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id JPF35794; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:36:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2008 22:35:43 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18330.43724.350912.730683@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:36:44 -0500 To: "Philip M. Gollucci" In-Reply-To: <479A691F.3000208@ridecharge.com> References: <18330.7978.514599.191654@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <479A691F.3000208@ridecharge.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr08.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: question about buildkernel warning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 03:36:55 -0000 Philip M. Gollucci writes: > > WARNING: duplicate option `DEV_ISA' encountered. > > WARNING: duplicate device `isa' encountered. > > WARNING: duplicate option `DEV_MEM' encountered. > > WARNING: duplicate device `mem' encountered. > > WARNING: duplicate option `DEV_IO' encountered. > > WARNING: duplicate device `io' encountered. > > These options are already in the DEFAULT file in the same > directory as your kernel config. That did it. Thank you. Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 06:56:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516E416A417 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 06:56:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from aristotle.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E9F13C442 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 06:56:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by aristotle.thought.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0Q6uYnp070396 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:56:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) From: Gary Kline To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 22:32:20 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200801251650.10700.kline@thought.org> <66C4132F-0441-43AF-87F0-6BCC7CBE8238@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <66C4132F-0441-43AF-87F0-6BCC7CBE8238@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801252232.20876.kline@thought.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on aristotle.thought.org Subject: Re: why am i sending mutt mail with my FQDN?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 06:56:41 -0000 On Friday 25 January 2008 17:12:35 Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Jan 25, 2008, at 4:50 PM, Gary Kline wrote: > > The problem with t rying to use mutt, even when I reach my > > mailserver on > > aristotle.thought.org, is that *somehow* -- I do not understand how > > -- but > > for some reason, mutt tacks on the FDQN rather than simply my domain > > name. > > [ ... ] > > > it never reached me at magnesium.net. Can anybody clue me in? > > Sure. If you want to masquerade a local machine's FQDN to just your > domain name, follow the happy instructions from the FAQ: > > http://www.sendmail.org/m4/masquerading.html I couldn't find anythinng on the page you pointed me at. I added MASQUERADE_AS() to both mc files, first one, then the other, then both. Would up breaking even this configuration. I think that the MASQUERADE_AS() functionality enables only to change host+domain rather that rewrite the address only with the domain name. -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 06:56:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41F116A418 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 06:56:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (mp.cs.niu.edu [131.156.68.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEB0413C465 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 06:56:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (bennett@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp.cs.niu.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0Q6uS7r029141 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:56:28 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:56:28 -0600 (CST) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <200801260656.m0Q6uS1G029140@mp.cs.niu.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: gencat error messages during 6.3-STABLE buildworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 06:56:56 -0000 During a "make buildworld" in serial-make mode, I'm getting gencat error messages. Here is an excerpt from the output. ===> bin/csh (all) cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.dir.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.dol.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.err.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.exec.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.char.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.exp.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.file.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.func.c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.func.c: In function `iconv_catgets': /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.func.c:2486: warning: passing arg 2 of pointer to function from incompatible pointer type cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.glob.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.hist.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.init.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.lex.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.misc.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.parse.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.print.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.proc.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.sem.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.set.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/sh.time.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/glob.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/mi.termios.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tw.help.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tw.init.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tw.parse.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tw.spell.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tw.comp.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tw.color.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/ed.chared.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/ed.defns.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/ed.init.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/ed.inputl.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/ed.refresh.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/ed.screen.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/ed.xmap.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/ed.term.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.alloc.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.bind.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.const.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.disc.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.func.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.nls.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.os.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.printf.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.prompt.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.sched.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.sig.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.str.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.vers.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tc.who.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c tc.defs.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -c /usr/src/bin/csh/iconv_stub.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -I. -I/usr/src/bin/csh -I/usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh -D_PATH_TCSHELL='"/bin/csh"' -DHAVE_ICONV -o csh sh.o sh.dir.o sh.dol.o sh.err.o sh.exec.o sh.char.o sh.exp.o sh.file.o sh.func.o sh.glob.o sh.hist.o sh.init.o sh.lex.o sh.misc.o sh.parse.o sh.print.o sh.proc.o sh.sem.o sh.set.o sh.time.o glob.o mi.termios.o tw.help.o tw.init.o tw.parse.o tw.spell.o tw.comp.o tw.color.o ed.chared.o ed.defns.o ed.init.o ed.inputl.o ed.refresh.o ed.screen.o ed.xmap.o ed.term.o tc.alloc.o tc.bind.o tc.const.o tc.disc.o tc.func.o tc.nls.o tc.os.o tc.printf.o tc.prompt.o tc.sched.o tc.sig.o tc.str.o tc.vers.o tc.who.o tc.defs.o iconv_stub.o -ltermcap -lcrypt cat /usr/src/bin/csh/../../contrib/tcsh/tcsh.man > csh.1 gzip -cn csh.1 > csh.1.gz gencat et_EE.ISO8859-15.cat et_EE.ISO8859-15.msg gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 144 head 1.1; ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 145 branch 1.1.1; ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 146 access; ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 147 symbols ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 148 tcsh_6_15:1.1.1.2 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 149 RELENG_6_2_0_RELEASE:1.1.1.1 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 150 RELENG_6_2:1.1.1.1.0.24 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 151 RELENG_6_2_BP:1.1.1.1 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 152 RELENG_5_5_0_RELEASE:1.1.1.1 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 153 RELENG_5_5:1.1.1.1.0.22 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 154 RELENG_5_5_BP:1.1.1.1 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 155 RELENG_6_1_0_RELEASE:1.1.1.1 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 156 RELENG_6_1:1.1.1.1.0.20 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 157 RELENG_6_1_BP:1.1.1.1 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 158 RELENG_6_0_0_RELEASE:1.1.1.1 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 159 RELENG_6_0:1.1.1.1.0.18 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 160 RELENG_6_0_BP:1.1.1.1 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 161 RELENG_6:1.1.1.1.0.16 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 162 RELENG_6_BP:1.1.1.1 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 163 RELENG_5_4_0_RELEASE:1.1.1.1 ^ Then, more than 119,000 lines later, it finishes with that task. gencat: specified msg doesn't exist on line 7315 1.1.1.1.2.2 gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 7316 log ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 7317 @MFC: update to version 6.12 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 7318 (change list from 6.11 -> 6.12 can be found in src/contrib/tcsh/Fixes) ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 7319 @ ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 7320 text ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 7321 @d1 1 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 7322 a1 1 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 7324 d9 1 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 7325 a9 1 ^ gencat: neither blank line nor start of a message id on line 7327 @ ^ ===> bin/date (all) cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunused-parameter -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -c /usr/src/bin/date/date.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=prescott -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunused-parameter -Wchar-subscripts -Winline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -c /usr/src/bin/date/netdate.c In 6.2, this would happen anytime the buildworld was run in parallel-make mode (e.g., "make -j3 buildworld"), but would work with no error messages if the -j option were not specified. Now it is happening even in serial mode (i.e., no -j option). Does anyone know how to fix this? I surely do *not* want to do a "make installworld" until "make buildworld" has run correctly. Thanks in advance! Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 08:18:39 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E7816A417 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:18:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@magnesium.net) Received: from toxic.magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BF713C45D for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:18:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@magnesium.net) Received: by toxic.magnesium.net (Postfix, from userid 1070) id D588DDA8DB; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:19:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:19:58 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20080126081958.GA32455@thought.org> References: <200801252352.18140.kline@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200801252352.18140.kline@thought.org> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21 of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: test X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:18:39 -0000 On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 11:52:17PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > test > -- > Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public Service Unix > http://jottings.thought.org http://transfinite.thought.org Well, surprise, surprise! A glance at kline@DN [ rather than kline@[fully qual'd DN] proves that the following two lines do force sendmail to rewrite: aristotle.thought.org.mc:MASQUERADE_AS(`thought.org') aristotle.thought.org.mc-FEATURE(masquerade_envelope) Chuck, your pointer was right, but I didn't understand the fine points. The ``FEATURE()'' line mmust accompany the ``MASQUERADE_AS()'' LINE. And, obviously, with the proper strings within the parens. I found this on a Google listing after about 45-50 mins of searching. This is one of those fine tidbits that aren't widely known, but very useful.... gary PS: Hope this works!!!! -- Gary Kline Seattle BSD Users' Group (seabug) | kline@magnesium.net Thought Unlimited Org's Alternate Email Site http://www.magnesium.net/~kline To live is not a necessity; but to live honorably...is a necessity. -Kant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 08:31:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E465E16A420 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:31:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swapnil.in@eccouncil.org) Received: from inbox2.nyi.net (inbox2.nyi.net [64.147.100.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8389913C44B for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:31:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swapnil.in@eccouncil.org) Received: (qmail 92921 invoked by uid 79); 26 Jan 2008 08:04:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO omega) (202.53.13.138) by 0 with SMTP; 26 Jan 2008 08:04:40 -0000 Message-ID: <117b5205c64.-689601379333303098.4796396629668042484@@eccouncil.org> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:34:32 +0530 From: swapnil.in@eccouncil.org To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Medium) User-Agent: ZohoVO 3.0 X-Mailer: ZohoVO Status: RO X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:13:19 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Reference to your work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:31:19 -0000 Hello, Greetings of the day.=20 Please allow me to introducemyself as a member of the technical development= team at EC-Council.=20 Currentlywe are finalizing the release version of our course ware thatprepa= res aspirants for the certification =E2=80=98EC-Council Certified Secure Pr= ogrammer'as awarded by EC-Council. In this context, we would like to seek y= ourpermission to include references to your work =E2=80=9CRPC authenticatio= n " publishedat http://docs.freebsd.org/44doc/psd/23.rpc/paper.pdfas a re= source material for the said instructional material.This will further enric= h the knowledge base shared with the students and theintent is solely to di= sseminate knowledge-to-knowledge seekers. It would be an honor for us tofeature your work here and look forward to he= aring from you regarding your kindconsent. All due credits will be given in= the course ware in the researchendnotes and if you would like to adhere to= any specific copyright clause,please do let us know. We are committed towardsprotecting intellectual property and willing to do = all that it takes to upholdthis principle. Thank you for your time andconsideration. Thanks & Regards Swapnil Surkar Research Associate EC-Council http://www.eccouncil.org swapnil.in@eccouncil.org NOTICE: This communication is meant only for the addressee (s) named above = and may contain information which is and/or legally privileged. If you are = not the named addressee (s), or the agent responsible for receiving and del= ivering this communication to the named addressee (s), this communication h= as been sent to you in error. If so, kindly contact us immediately for retr= ieval purposes. Unauthorized dissemination, distribution, copying or relian= ce on this communication is prohibited and may attract criminal penalties. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 12:29:16 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D3616A418 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:29:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leosat.it@ariel.ru) Received: from mail1.ariel.ru (mail1.ariel.ru [85.21.118.146]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85EE13C459 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:29:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leosat.it@ariel.ru) Received: by mail1.ariel.ru (Postfix, from userid 1008) id 7AD3E9B897; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:15:01 +0300 (MSK) Received: from [10.254.254.3] (ppp85-140-146-228.pppoe.mtu-net.ru [85.140.146.228]) by mail1.ariel.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1048B9B86E for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:15:01 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <479B23C0.5040406@ariel.ru> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:12:48 +0300 From: Leonid Satanovsky User-Agent: Icedove 1.5.0.12 (X11/20070607) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: The question about Broadcom BCM5721 ethernet adapter integrated in motherboard, on PCIe and FreeBSD6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:29:16 -0000 Hi all! -------------------- The question is: -------------------- will FreeBSD 6.3 support Broadcom BCM5721 ethernet adapter integrated in motherboard (it's on PCIe bus) ? The motherboard is ASUSTeK P5M2-M (RTL) ------------------------------------------------------------------ Best regards, Leonid E. Satanovsky, system administrator / __end__, Ariel metal. tel.: +7 495 786-42-90,981-41-45, add.: 341 tel.: +7 495 786-43-03 e-mail: leosat.it@ariel.ru http://www.arielmetal.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 13:12:25 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F0B16A41A for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:12:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-out.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F30513C465 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:12:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from mx-av-03.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-02.forthnet.gr (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m0QDCN3T014107; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:12:23 +0200 Received: from MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr (mx-in-01.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.23]) by mx-av-03.forthnet.gr (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0QDCNXm014734; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:12:23 +0200 Received: from kobe.laptop (ppp47-170.adsl.forthnet.gr [62.1.64.170]) by MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0QDCKWG012630; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:12:22 +0200 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr header.from=keramida@ceid.upatras.gr; sender-id=neutral Received: from kobe.laptop (kobe.laptop [127.0.0.1]) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0QDCK8R004075; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:12:20 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from keramida@localhost) by kobe.laptop (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m0QDCKXN004074; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:12:20 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:12:20 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20080126131220.GA3628@kobe.laptop> References: <200801251650.10700.kline@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200801251650.10700.kline@thought.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: why am i sending mutt mail with my FQDN?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:12:25 -0000 On 2008-01-25 16:50, Gary Kline wrote: > The problem with trying to use mutt, even when I reach my mailserver > on aristotle.thought.org, is that *somehow* -- I do not understand how > -- but for some reason, mutt tacks on the FDQN rather than simply my > domain name. I was using Giorgos' $MAIL env variable; now that I > switched to Baptiste's longer method:: same thing. mutt still > prepends the hostname. > > The following I sent to myself, > > From: Gary Kline > Subject: testing > To: Gary Kline , kline@thought.org > > it never reached me at magnesium.net. Can anybody clue me in? That's not a mutt problem. If you want email from `tao.thought.org' to masquerade as email from `thought.org', you should configure your MTA to do this (Sendmail, Postfix or other). See the section: +---------------------------+ | MASQUERADING AND RELAYING | +---------------------------+ in `/usr/share/sendmail/cf/README', for more details :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 13:37:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C7916A41A for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:37:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.156]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C123B13C468 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:37:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1115222fgg.35 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 05:37:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=moPEx5bhKNpFxMw+o/tHTgVh6JEAa/4Do9yDJNnyJKE=; b=mmDK+nf3hsLB0juRTIZqGQt/TGQi0jtMdmER9FbhTJ+EWljf+TRkORaYkeojwBB1XORah6rbJQik8H9N5f0GoAL0+o9c+U/rFTniBD0KYw/puN/tkFGIQ92oVGHdW4vqjQuX3nhUAoTXPuQzEV9LH4lObAhMY5cxQgLrFDqJ8/4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=oB4UsiXZMSU8HfcJ/8QcxIZW9LYKrNwvWDcjMb6a2sJ+zpQgdkQjArdvRDoo3tsMCn6r65VCLD5193s+QEkLHCosFANo0F+sg8pMTjMO+4a8I3cQ5pgZmHVwsJlAsrCM7EeWJiDzW40wJsScUjN8bWjPJw900xrT329+0nkPaVc= Received: by 10.78.193.19 with SMTP id q19mr4504440huf.69.1201354639370; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 05:37:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.151.2 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 05:37:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801260537g562ecf9as60da4f80442ed506@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:37:19 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: freebsd-questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: configuring X11, no screens found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:37:21 -0000 Hello, I hope yo can point me in the right direction. I have never installed X11 but need it now so want to configure it. There are some errors I get: (II) Setting vga for screen 0. (II) Loading sub module "vgahw" (II) LoadModule: "vgahw" (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules//libvgahw.so (II) Module vgahw: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 1.4.0, module version = 0.1.0 ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 2.0 (II) I810(0): Creating default Display subsection in Screen section "Builtin Default i810 Screen 0" for depth/fbbpp 24/32 (==) I810(0): Depth 24, (==) framebuffer bpp 32 (EE) I810(0): Given bpp (32) is not supported by i810 driver (II) UnloadModule: "i810" (II) UnloadModule: "vgahw" (II) Unloading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules//libvgahw.so (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. Fatal server error: no screens found The content of /root/xorg.conf.new cat /root/xorg.conf.new |grep -40 Screen Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "X.org Configured" Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" EndSection Section "Files" RgbPath "/usr/local/share/X11/rgb" ModulePath "/usr/local/lib/xorg/modules" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/OTF" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" EndSection Section "Module" Load "GLcore" Load "dbe" Load "dri" Load "extmod" Load "glx" Load "record" Load "xtrap" Load "freetype" Load "type1" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "kbd" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" EndSection Section "Monitor" #DisplaySize 320 240 # mm Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "GSM" ModelName "" ### Comment all HorizSync and VertRefresh values to use DDC: HorizSync 30.0 - 71.0 VertRefresh 50.0 - 160.0 Option "DPMS" EndSection Section "Device" ### Available Driver options are:- ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" ### [arg]: arg optional #Option "NoAccel" # [] #Option "SWcursor" # [] #Option "ColorKey" # #Option "CacheLines" # #Option "Dac6Bit" # [] #Option "DRI" # [] #Option "NoDDC" # [] #Option "ShowCache" # [] #Option "XvMCSurfaces" # #Option "PageFlip" # [] Identifier "Card0" Driver "i810" VendorName "Intel Corporation" BoardName "82815 Chipset Graphics Controller (CGC)" BusID "PCI:0:2:0" EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 1 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 4 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 8 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 15 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 16 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 24 EndSubSection EndSection I happen to have LG Flatron T710BH monitor but have no idea about its resolution and so on. What can I do to configure X11? I do want to base it on FreeBSD (6.3) without erasing data and installing PCBSD or NetBSD. Thank you in advance! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 13:55:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997AA16A417 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:55:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ws@au.dyndns.ws) Received: from ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35AF013C43E for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:55:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ws@au.dyndns.ws) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAALvKmkeWZWdv/2dsb2JhbAAIkXOaeA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,254,1199626200"; d="scan'208";a="42653990" Received: from ppp103-111.static.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.131]) ([150.101.103.111]) by ipmail05.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 27 Jan 2008 00:25:39 +1030 From: Wayne Sierke To: David Larkin In-Reply-To: <20080126004826.79c911e7@sparrow> References: <1250.63.65.46.186.1201301818.squirrel@webmail.pknet.net> <20080126004826.79c911e7@sparrow> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 00:25:37 +1030 Message-Id: <1201355738.32888.15.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: formatting disk for FreeBSD : Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:55:43 -0000 David, On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 00:48 +0000, David Larkin wrote: > It is a fairly old machine I am trying to use. > One that has been switched off and gathering dust for some time. > > ROM PCI/ISA BIOS 2A5LHL1A > > Award Modular BIOS v4.51PG, AnEnergy Star Ally > Copyright(c) 1984-99 Award Software, Inc. That bios description looks terribly familiar. > I've never updated a BIOS before and it sounds a bit scarey. Well, the first step is to see if there's even one available. You might well find the machine already has the latest available (manufacturer's) bios. > I guess I'll just overwrite an old 10Gig disk with FreeBSD 4.3 on instead. > > I don't really need the extra space but thought it would be sensible to install on a new disk. > > Probably stick the new disk on ebay ;-) Well, depends what you want to do with the machine. Chances are you'll find that you're going to want that extra space soon enough. Plus there's no telling how much life is left in that old 10 Gigger - not that there's any guarantee your new one won't fail, either. Such is life. Having two physical drives can be useful in a number of circumstances, too. I posted some years back about difficulties I was having getting a bios to recognise a large hdd's geometry. Yes, here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2003-April/002301.html Note the part about setting the heads to 15 in the bios. That is, disable the auto-detect-on-boot and set the geometry manually. Good luck. Wayne From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 13:55:47 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F23C16A419 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:55:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (filter2-tmobile.zx.nl [194.187.76.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA0BC13C442 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:55:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15791C72F2 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:55:43 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zx.nl Received: from filter2-tmobile.zx.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (filter2.zx.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10127) with ESMTP id 14-0YClQyDfn for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:55:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [84.241.202.163]) by filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:55:24 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <479B3BCE.3050808@student.utwente.nl> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:55:26 +0000 From: "Alphons \"Fonz\" van Werven" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [FreeBSD] 6.3-R diskhandling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:55:47 -0000 Hi, I have a recent model Toshiba laptop here, dual-booting Windows Vista and Slackware Linux (not my call, so no flames please). When I got the go-ahead to replace Linux with FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE, the following happened: The partitioner complained that the found geometry 232581/16/63 is invalid and it's using a more likely geometry instead. Closer inspection reveals that this "more likely" geom (14593/255/63) is actually the real geometry, so question 1 is: where did FreeBSD get this other weird-ass geometry from? When installing the boot manager, it hosed Windows' bootability. I could mount and access the Windows partition from within FreeBSD just fine so the partition itself seemed to be okay, but it just wouldn't boot. When I selected it in the bootmanager menu, it showed a screen saying Windows can't boot and I should use the recovery disk to repair Windows. Since everything on the machine that was even remotely important had just been backed up and Windows was due for a reinstall anyway, I just reinstalled it and no harm was done, but I still wonder what happened. How come FreeBSD's boot manager stopped Windows from booting? The reinstall of Windows wiped away everything else, so I can retry installing FreeBSD. But given the troubles described above, what's the best way to do it? Currently, I'm considering the following: 1. Boot this Live Linux CD I have lying around here and which finds the correct geometry for the disk right away. 2. Make a backup of the MBR. 3. Create a partition (slice) for FreeBSD. 4. Boot the FreeBSD install disk and run through sysinstall (partitioning the slice Linux just created) but don't let it install a boot loader. 5. Boot the Live Linux again and install LILO from there. But if you have any other suggestions I'm all ears of course. Oh, and a final question: the Windows installer creates a partition table in which partitions (slices) don't end on cylinder/track boundaries. Is this a big deal? Linux notices it but doesn't seem bothered much by it and FreeBSD appears to act likewise. But I thought I'd better ask, just to be sure. Thanks in advance, Alphons -- VISTA - Viruses Intruders Spyware Trojans Adware From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 14:21:14 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3C216A417 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:21:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nino80@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF64D13C4D1 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:21:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nino80@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so971054rvb.43 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 06:21:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=3btuQlT/R+IESbArMBY7uP71sx065qZqmKT0XDzuwNg=; b=AjGrrnhRHquOW08Vpebvepu6lsAF1ecSXQo/4At+ALH6auBJaXWvIgWRnNEAckYPE9nykYRPwEVr0xzMHPWIyUzcv1m0D3EIo8CdpzeYPuL5VwQBYN4o+xf7rM5QSUk2UjCYaPfkzkkdZCGg0wRjbr9Pv6bHbnnwCqzdoCmX9Fw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=jB35oHi7aqh2p0VYUi6YxJkNz5WQhCmR3TIxjNbUWE1f7ztg7DQ2H0zfTjmsfnG1puZV++qVNfp0/lS6+gFpy2XLfLA9frGFTItBYKjGmNtcbz/Dw1x/Vszt9kNNErd+2JWj13SUKDOPR8keXz6KUbUsXi6yuxa+5AYXWaUD4sY= Received: by 10.141.198.9 with SMTP id a9mr2141480rvq.280.1201355715520; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 05:55:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.201.12 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 05:55:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <92bcbda50801260555v49f092d4i88e5907a21738343@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:55:15 +0100 From: "n j" To: "Free BSD Questions list" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Truss and procfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:21:14 -0000 Hello everyone, just a short question regarding truss - I did some googling and found a reference to a conversation with proposed (working?) patch to eliminate dependency on procfs. That was in April 2007: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2007-April/070574.html Does anybody knows if this got committed in any branch? On a side note, last time I used strace was over a year ago, has it got any better on 6.2 or 6.3 release? Thanks, -- Nino From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 14:35:50 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B05C16A419 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:35:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from iota.fastbighost.com (iota.fastbighost.com [65.98.8.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA1A13C465 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:35:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ghirai@ghirai.com) Received: from [89.123.34.240] (port=54756 helo=deimos.bsd.nix) by iota.fastbighost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JIm8F-0001MR-BM; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:35:43 +0000 Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:34:43 +0200 From: Ghirai To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20080126163443.dcdf9202.ghirai@ghirai.com> In-Reply-To: <479B3BCE.3050808@student.utwente.nl> References: <479B3BCE.3050808@student.utwente.nl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: ghirai@ghirai.com X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - iota.fastbighost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ghirai.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: "Alphons \"Fonz\" van Werven" Subject: Re: [FreeBSD] 6.3-R diskhandling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:35:50 -0000 On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:55:26 +0000 "Alphons \"Fonz\" van Werven" wrote: > Hi, > > I have a recent model Toshiba laptop here, dual-booting Windows Vista and > Slackware Linux (not my call, so no flames please). When I got the > go-ahead to replace Linux with FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE, the following > happened: > > The partitioner complained that the found geometry 232581/16/63 is invalid > and it's using a more likely geometry instead. Closer inspection reveals > that this "more likely" geom (14593/255/63) is actually the real geometry, > so question 1 is: where did FreeBSD get this other weird-ass geometry > from? > > When installing the boot manager, it hosed Windows' bootability. I could > mount and access the Windows partition from within FreeBSD just fine so > the partition itself seemed to be okay, but it just wouldn't boot. When I > selected it in the bootmanager menu, it showed a screen saying Windows > can't boot and I should use the recovery disk to repair Windows. Since > everything on the machine that was even remotely important had just been > backed up and Windows was due for a reinstall anyway, I just reinstalled > it and no harm was done, but I still wonder what happened. How come > FreeBSD's boot manager stopped Windows from booting? > > The reinstall of Windows wiped away everything else, so I can retry > installing FreeBSD. But given the troubles described above, what's the > best way to do it? Currently, I'm considering the following: > 1. Boot this Live Linux CD I have lying around here and which finds the > correct geometry for the disk right away. > 2. Make a backup of the MBR. > 3. Create a partition (slice) for FreeBSD. > 4. Boot the FreeBSD install disk and run through sysinstall (partitioning > the slice Linux just created) but don't let it install a boot loader. > 5. Boot the Live Linux again and install LILO from there. > But if you have any other suggestions I'm all ears of course. > > Oh, and a final question: the Windows installer creates a partition table > in which partitions (slices) don't end on cylinder/track boundaries. Is > this a big deal? Linux notices it but doesn't seem bothered much by it and > FreeBSD appears to act likewise. But I thought I'd better ask, just to be > sure. > > Thanks in advance, > > Alphons > This article might help: http://www.clearchain.com/wiki/FreeBSD_%26_Windows_Vista -- Regards, Ghirai. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 14:42:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC4CA16A41A for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.77]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E7B13C4E1 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aquarius.dyndns.org (athedsl-286326.home.otenet.gr [85.73.166.20]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m0QEgYJJ020505 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:42:34 +0200 Message-ID: <479B46DA.80906@otenet.gr> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:42:34 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <479B3BCE.3050808@student.utwente.nl> In-Reply-To: <479B3BCE.3050808@student.utwente.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [FreeBSD] 6.3-R diskhandling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:42:37 -0000 Alphons "Fonz" van Werven wrote: > Hi, > > I have a recent model Toshiba laptop here, dual-booting Windows Vista and > Slackware Linux (not my call, so no flames please). When I got the > go-ahead to replace Linux with FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE, the following > happened: > > The partitioner complained that the found geometry 232581/16/63 is > invalid > and it's using a more likely geometry instead. Closer inspection reveals > that this "more likely" geom (14593/255/63) is actually the real > geometry, > so question 1 is: where did FreeBSD get this other weird-ass geometry > from? > > When installing the boot manager, it hosed Windows' bootability. I could > mount and access the Windows partition from within FreeBSD just fine so > the partition itself seemed to be okay, but it just wouldn't boot. When I > selected it in the bootmanager menu, it showed a screen saying Windows > can't boot and I should use the recovery disk to repair Windows. Since > everything on the machine that was even remotely important had just been > backed up and Windows was due for a reinstall anyway, I just reinstalled > it and no harm was done, but I still wonder what happened. How come > FreeBSD's boot manager stopped Windows from booting? > > The reinstall of Windows wiped away everything else, so I can retry > installing FreeBSD. But given the troubles described above, what's the > best way to do it? Currently, I'm considering the following: > 1. Boot this Live Linux CD I have lying around here and which finds the > correct geometry for the disk right away. > 2. Make a backup of the MBR. > 3. Create a partition (slice) for FreeBSD. > 4. Boot the FreeBSD install disk and run through sysinstall (partitioning > the slice Linux just created) but don't let it install a boot loader. > 5. Boot the Live Linux again and install LILO from there. > But if you have any other suggestions I'm all ears of course. > > Oh, and a final question: the Windows installer creates a partition table > in which partitions (slices) don't end on cylinder/track boundaries. Is > this a big deal? Linux notices it but doesn't seem bothered much by it > and > FreeBSD appears to act likewise. But I thought I'd better ask, just to be > sure. > > Thanks in advance, > > Alphons > When installing FreeBSD and you are asked what boot manager to install select to not install anything. In this way your Vista boot will not be affected. If after this you find that at startup you are not given ANY choice but FreeBSD starts automatically, this is simply because it's partition is marked active. Boot with a CD like Norton Partition Magic or GParted and mark the Vista partition active. Boot Vista, then download and install the EasyBCD from www.neowin.net It is then trivial to add a stanza to Vista bootloader (!) to boot FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 14:45:18 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A4E16A417 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:45:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.77]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E961913C4EF for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:45:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aquarius.dyndns.org (athedsl-286326.home.otenet.gr [85.73.166.20]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m0QEjGtL021506 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:45:16 +0200 Message-ID: <479B477B.9010100@otenet.gr> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:45:15 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <479B3BCE.3050808@student.utwente.nl> <479B46DA.80906@otenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <479B46DA.80906@otenet.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [FreeBSD] 6.3-R diskhandling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:45:18 -0000 Manolis Kiagias wrote: > > > Alphons "Fonz" van Werven wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have a recent model Toshiba laptop here, dual-booting Windows Vista >> and >> Slackware Linux (not my call, so no flames please). When I got the >> go-ahead to replace Linux with FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE, the following >> happened: >> >> The partitioner complained that the found geometry 232581/16/63 is >> invalid >> and it's using a more likely geometry instead. Closer inspection reveals >> that this "more likely" geom (14593/255/63) is actually the real >> geometry, >> so question 1 is: where did FreeBSD get this other weird-ass geometry >> from? >> >> When installing the boot manager, it hosed Windows' bootability. I could >> mount and access the Windows partition from within FreeBSD just fine so >> the partition itself seemed to be okay, but it just wouldn't boot. >> When I >> selected it in the bootmanager menu, it showed a screen saying Windows >> can't boot and I should use the recovery disk to repair Windows. Since >> everything on the machine that was even remotely important had just been >> backed up and Windows was due for a reinstall anyway, I just reinstalled >> it and no harm was done, but I still wonder what happened. How come >> FreeBSD's boot manager stopped Windows from booting? >> >> The reinstall of Windows wiped away everything else, so I can retry >> installing FreeBSD. But given the troubles described above, what's the >> best way to do it? Currently, I'm considering the following: >> 1. Boot this Live Linux CD I have lying around here and which finds the >> correct geometry for the disk right away. >> 2. Make a backup of the MBR. >> 3. Create a partition (slice) for FreeBSD. >> 4. Boot the FreeBSD install disk and run through sysinstall >> (partitioning >> the slice Linux just created) but don't let it install a boot loader. >> 5. Boot the Live Linux again and install LILO from there. >> But if you have any other suggestions I'm all ears of course. >> >> Oh, and a final question: the Windows installer creates a partition >> table >> in which partitions (slices) don't end on cylinder/track boundaries. Is >> this a big deal? Linux notices it but doesn't seem bothered much by >> it and >> FreeBSD appears to act likewise. But I thought I'd better ask, just >> to be >> sure. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Alphons >> > When installing FreeBSD and you are asked what boot manager to install > select to not install anything. In this way your Vista boot will not > be affected. > If after this you find that at startup you are not given ANY choice > but FreeBSD starts automatically, this is simply because it's > partition is marked active. > Boot with a CD like Norton Partition Magic or GParted and mark the > Vista partition active. Boot Vista, then download and install the > EasyBCD from www.neowin.net > It is then trivial to add a stanza to Vista bootloader (!) to boot > FreeBSD. > Sorry the correct link is: http://neosmart.net/dl.php?id=1 Manolis From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 14:58:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADA916A417 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:58:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from filter1-tmobile.zx.nl (filter1-tmobile.zx.nl [194.187.76.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AC2613C442 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:58:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filter1-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BD1D414B; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:58:11 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zx.nl Received: from filter1-tmobile.zx.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (filter1.zx.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10127) with ESMTP id nkpdZ0D7vSOX; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:57:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [84.241.202.163]) by filter1-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:57:55 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <479B4A75.4040001@student.utwente.nl> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:57:57 +0000 From: "Alphons \"Fonz\" van Werven" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ghirai References: <479B3BCE.3050808@student.utwente.nl> <20080126163443.dcdf9202.ghirai@ghirai.com> In-Reply-To: <20080126163443.dcdf9202.ghirai@ghirai.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD] 6.3-R diskhandling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 14:58:13 -0000 Ghirai wrote: > This article might help: http://www.clearchain.com/wiki/FreeBSD_%26_Windows_Vista Okay, thanks for the link. I was not aware of that. However, I do think there's more to it than that. After all, Slackware was able to install LILO without any problems whatsoever. Both Vista and Linux would boot just fine. Alphons -- VISTA - Viruses Intruders Spyware Trojans Adware From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 15:19:09 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F148516A419 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:19:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B3713C461 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:19:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite ([24.166.217.200]) by hrndva-omta04.mail.rr.com with SMTP id <20080126151908.HQON17975.hrndva-omta04.mail.rr.com@satellite> for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:19:08 +0000 Message-ID: <000d01c8602e$b8287380$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:18:34 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Subject: samba 3.28 port compilation gives error about locking unavailable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:19:10 -0000 Hello, I'm trying to install samba 3.28 on 6.3. Previously i had installed samba on 6.2 without seeing this error. LDAP_LIBS = -lldap -llber AUTH_LIBS = -lcrypt -lpam checking configure summary... ERROR: No locking available. Running Samba would be unsafe configure: error: summary failure. Aborting config ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. I believe this is something specific to this system and not a port issue, i've done this install in a jailed environment and the compilation worked fine. This 6.3 install was done using sysinstall's minimum working configuration option. I'm trying to configure samba as a pdc with an ldap backend. If anyone has an idea on this locking error i'm open to suggestions. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 15:46:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E4D16A468 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:46:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (filter2-tmobile.zx.nl [194.187.76.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BDE13C47E for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:46:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979111C72F3; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:46:51 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zx.nl Received: from filter2-tmobile.zx.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (filter2.zx.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10127) with ESMTP id qNKApFIsISBq; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:46:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [84.241.202.163]) by filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:46:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <479B55E7.7020705@student.utwente.nl> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:46:47 +0000 From: "Alphons \"Fonz\" van Werven" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Manolis Kiagias References: <479B3BCE.3050808@student.utwente.nl> <479B46DA.80906@otenet.gr> <479B477B.9010100@otenet.gr> In-Reply-To: <479B477B.9010100@otenet.gr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD] 6.3-R diskhandling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:46:54 -0000 Manolis Kiagias wrote: > then download and install the EasyBCD That too seems a solution worth considering. I'll think about it. Thanks! Alphons -- VISTA - Viruses Intruders Spyware Trojans Adware From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 15:53:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FDD916A420 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:53:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) Received: from rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA90813C45D for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:53:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1345E1D7A30; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:53:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtps02.kuleuven.be (smtpshost02.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.75]) by rusty.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD5F1D7A1F; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:53:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from kalimero.kotnet.org (kalimero.kotnet.org [10.4.16.222]) by smtps02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12029F3862; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:53:47 +0100 (CET) Received: from kalimero.kotnet.org (kalimero.kotnet.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.kotnet.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0QFrkk0004076; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:53:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Tijl Coosemans To: stevefranks@ieee.org Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:53:44 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <539c60b90801222020je26085aya2a52553b7e33972@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <539c60b90801222020je26085aya2a52553b7e33972@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801261653.46049.tijl@ulyssis.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dri on radeon mobility 7500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:53:51 -0000 On Wednesday 23 January 2008 05:20:33 Steve Franks wrote: > I get the infamous "Xlib: extension "XFree86-DRI" missing on display > ":0.0" error on my new system (7.0rc1). I've put dri & glx in > xorg.conf (7.3), to no avail. > > Relevant dmesg: > ... > drm0: on vgapci0 > info: [drm] AGP at 0xe4000000 64MB > info: [drm] Initialized radeon 1.25.0 20060524 > ... > info: [drm] Setting GART location based on new memory map > info: [drm] writeback test succeeded in 1 usecs > drm0: [ITHREAD] > error: [drm:pid1180:drm_close] *ERROR* can't find authenticator > .... Some obvious problems I can think of: Do you have something like this in xorg.conf: Section "DRI" Mode 0660 # Set permissions on drm device EndSection And, do you actually have dri drivers installed (graphics/dri port)? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 16:03:34 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1122116A419 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:03:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from canito@dalan.us) Received: from netbits.us (ptr-89.fastconcepts.net [209.18.107.89]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C001B13C447 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:03:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from canito@dalan.us) Received: (qmail 8699 invoked by uid 65534); 26 Jan 2008 16:03:31 -0000 Received: from c-75-72-15-67.hsd1.mn.comcast.net (c-75-72-15-67.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [75.72.15.67]) by mail.dalan.us (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:03:31 -0600 Message-ID: <20080126100331.tnc8s15ggk8kwcoc@mail.dalan.us> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:03:31 -0600 From: David Alanis To: Zbigniew Szalbot References: <94136a2c0801260537g562ecf9as60da4f80442ed506@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801260537g562ecf9as60da4f80442ed506@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.4) Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: configuring X11, no screens found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:03:34 -0000 Zbigniew: If you did an x11 user from the install disk you wont be able to run =20 x11 right off the bat. I would recommend searching the archive for a =20 solution thus this has been asked many times. Here I will make it =20 easier for you. Search for this thread: x11 missing modules on 7.0rc1 ? Here: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2008-January/thread.htm= l Here is my xorg.conf file http:www/dalan.us/download/xorg.conf use it for reference! Thanks: David Alanis Quoting Zbigniew Szalbot : > Hello, > > I hope yo can point me in the right direction. I have never installed > X11 but need it now so want to configure it. There are some errors I > get: > > (II) Setting vga for screen 0. > (II) Loading sub module "vgahw" > (II) LoadModule: "vgahw" > (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules//libvgahw.so > (II) Module vgahw: vendor=3D"X.Org Foundation" > compiled for 1.4.0, module version =3D 0.1.0 > ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 2.0 > (II) I810(0): Creating default Display subsection in Screen section > "Builtin Default i810 Screen 0" for depth/fbbpp 24/32 > (=3D=3D) I810(0): Depth 24, (=3D=3D) framebuffer bpp 32 > (EE) I810(0): Given bpp (32) is not supported by i810 driver > (II) UnloadModule: "i810" > (II) UnloadModule: "vgahw" > (II) Unloading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules//libvgahw.so > (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. > > Fatal server error: > no screens found > > The content of /root/xorg.conf.new > > cat /root/xorg.conf.new |grep -40 Screen > Section "ServerLayout" > Identifier "X.org Configured" > Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 > InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" > InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" > EndSection > > Section "Files" > RgbPath "/usr/local/share/X11/rgb" > ModulePath "/usr/local/lib/xorg/modules" > FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" > FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" > FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/OTF" > FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" > FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" > FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" > EndSection > > Section "Module" > Load "GLcore" > Load "dbe" > Load "dri" > Load "extmod" > Load "glx" > Load "record" > Load "xtrap" > Load "freetype" > Load "type1" > EndSection > > Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "Keyboard0" > Driver "kbd" > EndSection > > Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "Mouse0" > Driver "mouse" > Option "Protocol" "auto" > Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" > Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" > EndSection > > Section "Monitor" > #DisplaySize 320 240 # mm > Identifier "Monitor0" > VendorName "GSM" > ModelName "" > ### Comment all HorizSync and VertRefresh values to use DDC: > HorizSync 30.0 - 71.0 > VertRefresh 50.0 - 160.0 > Option "DPMS" > EndSection > > Section "Device" > ### Available Driver options are:- > ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", > ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" > ### [arg]: arg optional > #Option "NoAccel" # [] > #Option "SWcursor" # [] > #Option "ColorKey" # > #Option "CacheLines" # > #Option "Dac6Bit" # [] > #Option "DRI" # [] > #Option "NoDDC" # [] > #Option "ShowCache" # [] > #Option "XvMCSurfaces" # > #Option "PageFlip" # [] > Identifier "Card0" > Driver "i810" > VendorName "Intel Corporation" > BoardName "82815 Chipset Graphics Controller (CGC)" > BusID "PCI:0:2:0" > EndSection > > Section "Screen" > Identifier "Screen0" > Device "Card0" > Monitor "Monitor0" > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 1 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 4 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 8 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 15 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 16 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 24 > EndSubSection > EndSection > > I happen to have LG Flatron T710BH monitor but have no idea about its > resolution and so on. What can I do to configure X11? > > I do want to base it on FreeBSD (6.3) without erasing data and > installing PCBSD or NetBSD. > > Thank you in advance! > > Zbigniew Szalbot > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" > ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 16:09:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F5616A417 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:09:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bobbbing@googlemail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB3113C442 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:09:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bobbbing@googlemail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so998870rvb.43 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:09:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=nUGus18j9ZQBfL5NRMEbPQ2Hd3cwdg8brqtX3Q6HTRI=; b=ZH9UP0DRFa+GTpL4B4BHADoHYqYcYNT6KyZaATAa/7i4jbPKfmXkcOKwLGcrPjSCd9CUOprJqObDxpiy0gG0q1+tDVXCXOa2/XKhhTtv1NbK2fW1wdZv0wrndX8aUHGMlc6jRnFJG4rZJVsl8gafOkCAJJMFiLaiP+dWwBmgpqs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=agPR0T+dsOYNcXFyRlKDcex+832fwSbM9XjXPYfsovnixtYcbzMd9x8tD16KjWZqmrggltVl30eZzymiXZN3sp9maq04zV/1+CTxD3WE6KVYR+mcZdrB6n2axkELaAAOB1oz13z3XON3WgjpeqEV9uKT/RbGG//Efv5qeS7yM5M= Received: by 10.140.136.1 with SMTP id j1mr2215364rvd.233.1201362115324; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 07:41:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.141.197.15 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 07:41:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8c75d7960801260741p63cfe9x98fea042777caedc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:41:55 +0000 From: "Bob Bing" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: k3b not recognizing ATAPI DVD A DH20A1S UX11 write capability X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:09:58 -0000 Hi I installed k3b-1.0.4/cdrtools-2.01_6/dvd+rw-tools-7.0 on an amd64 6.3machine running GENERIC but k3b gives the following error: k3b: NON_CRITICAL k3b: PROBLEM: No CD/DVD writer found. k3b: DETAILS: K3b did not find an optical writing device in your system. Thus, you will not be able to burn CDs or DVDs. However, you can still use other K3b features like audio track extraction or audio transcoding or ISO9660 image creation. k3b: SOLUTION: Any hints on how I can fix this? It worked fine under Linux and OpenBSD (which I used to burn the 6.3 CDs) Thanks a lot Bob Copyright (c) 1992-2008 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE #0: Wed Jan 16 01:43:02 UTC 2008 root at palmer.cse.buffalo.edu :/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SMP ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4400+ (2299.75-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x60fb1 Stepping = 1 Features=0x178bfbff Features2=0x2001 AMD Features=0xea500800 AMD Features2=0x11f Cores per package: 2 real memory = 1039007744 (990 MB) avail memory = 989507584 (943 MB) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) hptrr: HPT RocketRAID controller driver v1.1 (Jan 16 2008 01:41:13) acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Overriding SCI Interrupt from IRQ 9 to IRQ 21 ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [LNKC] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND SearchNode 0xffffff0000c8ebc0 StartNode 0xffffff0000c8ebc0 ReturnNode 0 ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [LNKD] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND SearchNode 0xffffff0000c8ea40 StartNode 0xffffff0000c8ea40 ReturnNode 0 ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [LNKA] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND SearchNode 0xffffff0000c8e8c0 StartNode 0xffffff0000c8e8c0 ReturnNode 0 ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [LNKB] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND SearchNode 0xffffff0000c8e740 StartNode 0xffffff0000c8e740 ReturnNode 0 ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [LNKC] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND SearchNode 0xffffff0000cd29c0 StartNode 0xffffff0000cd29c0 ReturnNode 0 ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [LNKD] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND SearchNode 0xffffff0000cd2840 StartNode 0xffffff0000cd2840 ReturnNode 0 ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [LNKA] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND SearchNode 0xffffff0000cd26c0 StartNode 0xffffff0000cd26c0 ReturnNode 0 acpi0: Power Button (fixed) ACPI-0381: *** Error: Looking up [_PCT] in namespace, AE_ALREADY_EXISTS ACPI-1304: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.MEM_._CRS] (Node 0xffffff0000c95a00), AE_ALREADY_EXISTS ACPI-0239: *** Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.MEM_._CRS] (Node 0xffffff0000c95a00), AE_ALREADY_EXISTS can't fetch resources for \\_SB_.MEM_ - AE_ALREADY_EXISTS Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 850 acpi_timer0: <32-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 5.0 (no driver attached) atapci0: port 0xfe00-0xfe07,0xfd00-0xfd03,0xfc00-0xfc07,0xfb00-0xfb03,0xfa00-0xfa0f mem 0xfe02f000-0xfe02f1ff irq 23 at device 17.0 on pci0 ata2: on atapci0 ata3: on atapci0 atapci1: port 0xf900-0xf907,0xf800-0xf803,0xf700-0xf707,0xf600-0xf603,0xf500-0xf50f mem 0xfe02e000-0xfe02e1ff irq 22 at device 18.0 on pci0 ata4: on atapci1 ata5: on atapci1 ohci0: mem 0xfe02d000-0xfe02dfff irq 19 at device 19.0 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: ATI OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered ohci1: mem 0xfe02c000-0xfe02cfff irq 19 at device 19.1 on pci0 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: SMM does not respond, resetting usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: ATI OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xfe02b000-0xfe02bfff irq 19 at device 19.2 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: waiting for BIOS to give up control usb2: timed out waiting for BIOS usb2: EHCI version 1.0 usb2: companion controllers, 4 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2: on ehci0 usb2: USB revision 2.0 uhub2: ATI EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered umass0: Generic USB2.0-CRW, rev 2.00/11.22, addr 2 pci0: at device 20.0 (no driver attached) atapci2: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xf300-0xf30f at device 20.1 on pci0 ata0: on atapci2 ata1: on atapci2 isab0: at device 20.3 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pcib2: at device 20.4 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 rl0: port 0xde00-0xdeff mem 0xfddff000-0xfddff0ff irq 22 at device 5.0 on pci2 miibus0: on rl0 rlphy0: on miibus0 rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto rl0: Ethernet address: 00:19:21:3a:67:6c pci0: at device 20.5 (no driver attached) acpi_tz0: on acpi0 fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FAST] sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f,0x778-0x77b irq 7 drq 3 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (ECP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/16 bytes threshold ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcefff on isa0 atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 uhub0: device problem (SET_ADDR_FAILED), disabling port 2 ukbd0: vendor 0x1241 USB Keyboard, rev 1.10/2.90, addr 2, iclass 3/1 kbd2 at ukbd0 uhid0: vendor 0x1241 USB Keyboard, rev 1.10/2.90, addr 2, iclass 3/1 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec hptrr: no controller detected. ad8: 152627MB at ata4-master SATA150 acd0: DVDR at ata5-master SATA150 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 40.000MB/s transfers da0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present da1 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 1 da1: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device da1: 40.000MB/s transfers da1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present da2 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 2 da2: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device da2: 40.000MB/s transfers da2: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present da3 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 3 da3: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device da3: 40.000MB/s transfers da3: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad8s1a From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 16:10:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88FF16A417 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF9D13C442 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1158200fgg.35 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:10:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=w+FiWAcgM7U2z+LSK+7CZPM6xoQTxQGxM88KKFKw8Fo=; b=CFUBRW5yZ2Me+W4bbj01LIcLn4uN9TXkHsKvRLhrDKUBKyMNzYWgu8n49WrPnAkRWv9txtb9USBSMA7Im1ZukfpMWr3AxEzz590GJriQzye2tEx0XVAV6W9uvpU9YGTEWAsbLMGtyKbIubVIFv2BFO9IGyPC4wCxxj8qEjQgJMw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LZ4/PpzahluaiJ5FCv78UlTVZgarbXvLPmv2SEfYr+U3UN0vVsxTDEIv/3SOHrsbgLI+7mPNPdl17s7ct3/kxcEnJwF2AaZHpfci2SAH0CWxRyixPLs0R/5NC/YQkY0Y5RtFB6YRAM5Q4HyWL2722Co610EA10b9yQyseB6N04I= Received: by 10.78.170.17 with SMTP id s17mr4761033hue.35.1201363811747; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:10:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.151.2 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 08:10:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801260810m5e235a62g2a3efcbe433cb92b@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:10:11 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: freebsd-questions In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801260537g562ecf9as60da4f80442ed506@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <94136a2c0801260537g562ecf9as60da4f80442ed506@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: configuring X11, no screens found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:10:14 -0000 Hello again, 2008/1/26, Zbigniew Szalbot : > Hello, > > I hope yo can point me in the right direction. I have never installed > X11 but need it now so want to configure it. There are some errors I > get: > > (II) Setting vga for screen 0. > (II) Loading sub module "vgahw" > (II) LoadModule: "vgahw" > (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules//libvgahw.so > (II) Module vgahw: vendor="X.Org Foundation" > compiled for 1.4.0, module version = 0.1.0 > ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 2.0 > (II) I810(0): Creating default Display subsection in Screen section > "Builtin Default i810 Screen 0" for depth/fbbpp 24/32 > (==) I810(0): Depth 24, (==) framebuffer bpp 32 > (EE) I810(0): Given bpp (32) is not supported by i810 driver > (II) UnloadModule: "i810" > (II) UnloadModule: "vgahw" > (II) Unloading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules//libvgahw.so > (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. > > Fatal server error: > no screens found > > The content of /root/xorg.conf.new > > cat /root/xorg.conf.new |grep -40 Screen > Section "ServerLayout" > Identifier "X.org Configured" > Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 > InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" > InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" > EndSection > > Section "Files" > RgbPath "/usr/local/share/X11/rgb" > ModulePath "/usr/local/lib/xorg/modules" > FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" > FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" > FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/OTF" > FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" > FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" > FontPath "/usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" > EndSection > > Section "Module" > Load "GLcore" > Load "dbe" > Load "dri" > Load "extmod" > Load "glx" > Load "record" > Load "xtrap" > Load "freetype" > Load "type1" > EndSection > > Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "Keyboard0" > Driver "kbd" > EndSection > > Section "InputDevice" > Identifier "Mouse0" > Driver "mouse" > Option "Protocol" "auto" > Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" > Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" > EndSection > > Section "Monitor" > #DisplaySize 320 240 # mm > Identifier "Monitor0" > VendorName "GSM" > ModelName "" > ### Comment all HorizSync and VertRefresh values to use DDC: > HorizSync 30.0 - 71.0 > VertRefresh 50.0 - 160.0 > Option "DPMS" > EndSection > > Section "Device" > ### Available Driver options are:- > ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", > ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" > ### [arg]: arg optional > #Option "NoAccel" # [] > #Option "SWcursor" # [] > #Option "ColorKey" # > #Option "CacheLines" # > #Option "Dac6Bit" # [] > #Option "DRI" # [] > #Option "NoDDC" # [] > #Option "ShowCache" # [] > #Option "XvMCSurfaces" # > #Option "PageFlip" # [] > Identifier "Card0" > Driver "i810" > VendorName "Intel Corporation" > BoardName "82815 Chipset Graphics Controller (CGC)" > BusID "PCI:0:2:0" > EndSection > > Section "Screen" > Identifier "Screen0" > Device "Card0" > Monitor "Monitor0" > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 1 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 4 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 8 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 15 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 16 > EndSubSection > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 24 > EndSubSection > EndSection > > I happen to have LG Flatron T710BH monitor but have no idea about its > resolution and so on. What can I do to configure X11? I was able to deal with some of the errors but still there is one I get: (II) Setting vga for screen 0. (II) Loading sub module "vgahw" (II) LoadModule: "vgahw" (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules//libvgahw.so (II) Module vgahw: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 1.4.0, module version = 0.1.0 ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 2.0 (==) I810(0): Depth 24, (==) framebuffer bpp 32 (EE) I810(0): Given bpp (32) is not supported by i810 driver (II) UnloadModule: "i810" (II) UnloadModule: "vgahw" (II) Unloading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules//libvgahw.so (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. Fatal server error: no screens found I am not sure what (EE) I810(0): Given bpp (32) is not supported by i810 driver means. Thanks! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 16:22:03 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB6BD16A418 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:22:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from per-olof.nilsson2@comhem.se) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE4F13C46E for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:22:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from per-olof.nilsson2@comhem.se) Received: from c83-249-36-53.bredband.comhem.se ([83.249.36.53]:56998) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1JInn8-0008Dn-5A for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:22:02 +0100 From: tesolarisc To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <94136a2c0801260810m5e235a62g2a3efcbe433cb92b@mail.gmail.com> References: <94136a2c0801260537g562ecf9as60da4f80442ed506@mail.gmail.com> <94136a2c0801260810m5e235a62g2a3efcbe433cb92b@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-q0G/y/jPCoJzjwQo3doV" Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:23:03 +0100 Message-Id: <1201364583.2659.4.camel@zeus.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Originating-IP: 83.249.36.53 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1JInn8-0008Dn-5A. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1JInn8-0008Dn-5A 27efabd5881378337bb0e74c32b55e93 Subject: Re: configuring X11, no screens found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:22:03 -0000 --=-q0G/y/jPCoJzjwQo3doV Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:10 +0100, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > > (EE) I810(0): Given bpp (32) is not supported by i810 driver In the *screen* part of xorg.conf, try to put the default depth to 16bpp. Like this: part of /etc/X11/xorg.conf ... Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" DefaultDepth 16 SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 EndSubSection ... --=20 /Peo ---------------------------------------------- - PGP signed/encrypted emails is prefered -=20 ---------------------------------------------- =20 [novice about this? ~> visit: www.gnupg.org] --=-q0G/y/jPCoJzjwQo3doV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkebXmMACgkQgWSfflYlIbyMHQCfRw+zGrsR+vdOYK7B23s3xdAW tLoAoO23ijIeLPuaoS7lk7h5qM5qSnLl =hiTw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-q0G/y/jPCoJzjwQo3doV-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 16:56:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0134C16A419 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:56:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5674F13C4D3 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from aquarius.dyndns.org (athedsl-286326.home.otenet.gr [85.73.166.20]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id m0QGupjx025958 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:56:51 +0200 Message-ID: <479B6652.2010602@otenet.gr> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:56:50 +0200 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071231) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <479B3BCE.3050808@student.utwente.nl> <479B46DA.80906@otenet.gr> <479B477B.9010100@otenet.gr> <479B55E7.7020705@student.utwente.nl> In-Reply-To: <479B55E7.7020705@student.utwente.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [FreeBSD] 6.3-R diskhandling X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 16:56:55 -0000 Alphons "Fonz" van Werven wrote: > Manolis Kiagias wrote: > >> then download and install the EasyBCD > > That too seems a solution worth considering. > > I'll think about it. Thanks! > > Alphons > May I add I used this successfully on a number of occasions, including my current laptop. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 17:10:20 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541D016A41A for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:10:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159CA13C4CC for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:10:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2008 12:10:18 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id OIK41280; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:10:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from 209-6-22-188.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2008 12:09:17 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18331.27002.67108.88971@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:10:18 -0500 To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Subject: unexpected happening booting to single user X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:10:20 -0000 After updating a system to yesterday's -CURRENT, I get this init: NSSWITCH (_ndispatch) his, password_compat, endpwent not found, and no fallback provided just after the device enumeration when booting to single user mode. But not when booting to full operation. It doesn't /seem/ to break anything, but I'd like to unconfuse things if possible. Is there documentation on what's happening? If not, can someone explain? Respectfully, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 17:21:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90F5F16A41B for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:21:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) Received: from thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [134.58.240.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51CC713C442 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:21:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9D4138090; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:21:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtps02.kuleuven.be (smtpshost02.kulnet.kuleuven.be [134.58.240.75]) by thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49C3613809C; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:21:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from kalimero.kotnet.org (kalimero.kotnet.org [10.4.16.222]) by smtps02.kuleuven.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161D8F3863; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:21:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from kalimero.kotnet.org (kalimero.kotnet.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.kotnet.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m0QHLmPU004925; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:21:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@ulyssis.org) X-Kuleuven: This mail passed the K.U.Leuven mailcluster From: Tijl Coosemans To: "Bob Bing" Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:21:47 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <8c75d7960801260741p63cfe9x98fea042777caedc@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8c75d7960801260741p63cfe9x98fea042777caedc@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801261821.48276.tijl@ulyssis.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: k3b not recognizing ATAPI DVD A DH20A1S UX11 write capability X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:21:52 -0000 On Saturday 26 January 2008 16:41:55 Bob Bing wrote: > I installed k3b-1.0.4/cdrtools-2.01_6/dvd+rw-tools-7.0 on an amd64 > 6.3machine running GENERIC but k3b gives the following error: > > k3b: NON_CRITICAL > k3b: PROBLEM: No CD/DVD writer found. > k3b: DETAILS: K3b did not find an optical writing device in your > system. Thus, you will not be able to burn CDs or DVDs. However, you > can still use other K3b features like audio track extraction or audio > transcoding or ISO9660 image creation. > k3b: SOLUTION: > > Any hints on how I can fix this? It worked fine under Linux and OpenBSD > (which I used to burn the 6.3 CDs) You need to emulate it as a SCSI device: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/creating-cds.html#ATAPICAM From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 17:23:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D37216A417 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:23:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E297B13C4E7 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:23:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1182802fgg.35 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:23:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=rgpYfxfJsoiRTq5JUMOPj3jzYspHcjFuSznz5FLuUBE=; b=jverFDh+9kVhQLyvjfA/+L6Yn+U3lvPzILjhVEUnkPORBLSadyxGyf7kZqjVUFtL2A7MCDAWz3Xiet4qzINM321kW9c7Vwd0jiFT/yqwPbWRrYZ6EZqgnuOVoOZ0lYMyY9bAavvjAtXSaA2c3U4t6GcasD/D07aMTMCzhreoP3A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tDMVyib8ogoRXmOWJBkwobiJPKZCLXGcemwflYnJrvSgDwM5xisgmQUrskFincCgSMP/4qEYCeLoiFw9vKEDnNEfbHya1Oo3uAGXP3yNUgassSLAkTsxevlELhbkcEvttGd5SwBQrNFFL3s1wLjrQ8QIeRV4o4IObaic8h3gSBo= Received: by 10.78.107.8 with SMTP id f8mr4882659huc.38.1201368236427; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:23:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.78.151.2 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 09:23:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <94136a2c0801260923u1e0fd916q7d550c9d48c36315@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:23:56 +0100 From: "Zbigniew Szalbot" To: tesolarisc In-Reply-To: <1201364583.2659.4.camel@zeus.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <94136a2c0801260537g562ecf9as60da4f80442ed506@mail.gmail.com> <94136a2c0801260810m5e235a62g2a3efcbe433cb92b@mail.gmail.com> <1201364583.2659.4.camel@zeus.se> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: configuring X11, no screens found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 17:23:58 -0000 Hello, 2008/1/26, tesolarisc : > > On Sat, 2008-01-26 at 17:10 +0100, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > > > > (EE) I810(0): Given bpp (32) is not supported by i810 driver > > In the *screen* part of xorg.conf, try to put the default depth to > 16bpp. Like this: > > part of /etc/X11/xorg.conf > > ... > Section "Screen" > Identifier "Screen0" > Device "Card0" > Monitor "Monitor0" > DefaultDepth 16 > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > EndSubSection > ... > Thank you very much! Problem solved. I appreciate your help. Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 18:51:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0430016A421 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:51:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F1113C461 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:51:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id m0QIpAJ8098193; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:51:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Chris Whitehouse" , Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:52:13 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <479A896C.2010001@onetel.com> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:51:12 -0800 (PST) Cc: Subject: RE: formatting disk for FreeBSD : Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:51:13 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Chris > Whitehouse > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 5:14 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: formatting disk for FreeBSD : Detecting IDE Primary Master > ... [Press F4 to skip] > > > Nerius Landys wrote: > > > > > > The earler comment about the disk being too big might be the > issue. Update > > the motherboard's BIOS to the latest revision. You may have to do some > > digging to find this for an old motherboard. Tell us if that helps. > > _______________________________________________ > > Some motherboards had an upper limit on hard disk size which I think was > 32gb. Some drives have a jumper to limit the apparent size to 32gb (if > that was the size). > There have been lots of different limits through the years. The 32GB limit was an Award bios thing. You can read about them here: http://www.dewassoc.com/kbase/hard_drives/hard_drive_size_barriers.htm What the original poster needs to do is go and buy a used Promise or other UDMA controller card, insert the card in his PC, turn off the disk controller in BIOS, and use his 80GB disk. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 18:56:19 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6BE16A417 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:56:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A934113C455 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:56:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id m0QIuEnp098236; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:56:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Leonid Satanovsky" , Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:57:17 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1914 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <479B23C0.5040406@ariel.ru> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]); Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:56:15 -0800 (PST) Cc: Subject: RE: The question about Broadcom BCM5721 ethernet adapter integrated in motherboard, on PCIe and FreeBSD6.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 18:56:20 -0000 Yes. All of the Broadcom chips are the same and are supported by the bge driver. However, Broadcom and it's various motherboard customers seem to like to use different PCI id strings for the chip, and so you may find when you install it, that it does not detect the chip. A typical example of the problem is here: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/119779 and the fix, shown in this PR, is easy to implement. Basically, boot FreeBSD, if the chip isn't detected, run pciconf and take the output and patch the driver detection and you should be fine. Ted > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Leonid > Satanovsky > Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 4:13 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: The question about Broadcom BCM5721 ethernet adapter integrated > in motherboard, on PCIe and FreeBSD6.3 > > > Hi all! > -------------------- > The question is: > -------------------- > will FreeBSD 6.3 support Broadcom BCM5721 ethernet adapter integrated in > motherboard (it's on PCIe bus) ? > The motherboard is ASUSTeK P5M2-M (RTL) > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Best regards, > Leonid E. Satanovsky, > system administrator / __end__, > Ariel metal. > tel.: +7 495 786-42-90,981-41-45, add.: 341 > tel.: +7 495 786-43-03 > e-mail: leosat.it@ariel.ru > http://www.arielmetal.ru > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 19:57:43 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6781916A468 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:57:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tethys.ocean@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 284A813C467 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:57:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tethys.ocean@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so1679149pyb.10 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:57:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=TVLXikc0X8da+JjSB5Yl6TWXuSdeOlpB42XF38yrbmY=; b=eqdt5nyXBeq53L2R2ziwFRwH1MDBILN6q23w87Vbm5ZRznFrGXZXnI7DKp651yAOE1TBc6LUcNrp7jsGh3gTk+smxJXJqc/17T17wnvdxr7qrVqjSRfycvMYqYM98fBPLpod8bDwcE/zmGbrRsyKWxFd5gK7tYo08ouK3D1QphE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=umDiA1tLmQgRAoYAk7oi4+U+O7y4oIxuHAPyFc2VpJAsG7TRPT87pRwjMl30khDnKxMmspJwxdooA8QBhyKyhURru1wSFwKbDhdB7Hg2N/r+VKKhytX884zsXjxSr3iVcBw9F8GO8NNRNvIKZdFQW/VMRR5vZavH0EcoRolGq0k= Received: by 10.143.40.18 with SMTP id s18mr1837096wfj.168.1201375893828; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:31:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.136.20 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:31:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <235b80000801261131gad1e1b7r1a90683b59a4425c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:31:33 +0200 From: "tethys ocean" To: FreeBSD_Questions In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Fwd: insn-attrtab.c: In function 'ppro-po_unit_ready_cost' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:57:43 -0000 Hi all While I was make buildworld && make installworld such error occurs and process is stoped. Whats is the meaning of this. (FreeBSD 6.3 RELEASE) insn-attrtab.c: In function 'ppro-po_unit_ready_cost' insn-attrtab.c: 22086: error: stray ``' in program -- Share now a pigeon's flight Bluebound along the ancient skies, Its women forever hair and mammal, A Mediterranean town may arise If you rip apart a pigeon's heart. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 19:58:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854E816A421 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:58:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tethys.ocean@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3757913C47E for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:58:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tethys.ocean@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so1679329pyb.10 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:58:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=TVLXikc0X8da+JjSB5Yl6TWXuSdeOlpB42XF38yrbmY=; b=eqdt5nyXBeq53L2R2ziwFRwH1MDBILN6q23w87Vbm5ZRznFrGXZXnI7DKp651yAOE1TBc6LUcNrp7jsGh3gTk+smxJXJqc/17T17wnvdxr7qrVqjSRfycvMYqYM98fBPLpod8bDwcE/zmGbrRsyKWxFd5gK7tYo08ouK3D1QphE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=umDiA1tLmQgRAoYAk7oi4+U+O7y4oIxuHAPyFc2VpJAsG7TRPT87pRwjMl30khDnKxMmspJwxdooA8QBhyKyhURru1wSFwKbDhdB7Hg2N/r+VKKhytX884zsXjxSr3iVcBw9F8GO8NNRNvIKZdFQW/VMRR5vZavH0EcoRolGq0k= Received: by 10.143.40.18 with SMTP id s18mr1837096wfj.168.1201375893828; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:31:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.136.20 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 11:31:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <235b80000801261131gad1e1b7r1a90683b59a4425c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:31:33 +0200 From: "tethys ocean" To: FreeBSD_Questions In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Fwd: insn-attrtab.c: In function 'ppro-po_unit_ready_cost' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 19:58:15 -0000 Hi all While I was make buildworld && make installworld such error occurs and process is stoped. Whats is the meaning of this. (FreeBSD 6.3 RELEASE) insn-attrtab.c: In function 'ppro-po_unit_ready_cost' insn-attrtab.c: 22086: error: stray ``' in program -- Share now a pigeon's flight Bluebound along the ancient skies, Its women forever hair and mammal, A Mediterranean town may arise If you rip apart a pigeon's heart. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 20:03:37 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9734216A420 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:03:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 220AB13C44B for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:03:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nlandys@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so1233496fgg.35 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:03:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=p4xbNTCir1q1dlD+YiVIUHakYEIABJ9PRT9iLh7RuvU=; b=jALzZHXB7SC2htEqhfBxdI4+NSscAAtAbcmGdlpV32Ndoy2aeJje5HMQ4KQeCCQHrCkO2SmClrFhJrvdqRj5tZx8Da5EHdoYUfYJUhUMgnUk8T8bQHcLzFQgUMa3b6AjbdG4pqNGU3RdzSuHjKrxl+5jINkYw8t9Z3kzFQzMw98= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=pLmxCiJtqXjZWqbuIB8eeiWgBOK2yOSoLF/jrMIyj0UABT8u0LCF+223dU0m+Ctxe6Eb/8FUy/ADUSTWba6G1IY1LjksC0oH7tM7wAejZzpZMnR2hZRnpi0PEbtcDbSmXlrqQkFb9c9/gFG+eGT5gPscmgTv8YRskpGNsoaW41w= Received: by 10.82.161.19 with SMTP id j19mr6429573bue.20.1201377815288; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:03:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.160.10 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:03:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <560f92640801261203i419bd27fq69cd96484cef9e05@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:03:35 -0800 From: "Nerius Landys" To: "Chris Whitehouse" In-Reply-To: <479A896C.2010001@onetel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20080125224807.233a2a14@sparrow> <560f92640801251437r3fd38d83xc7ec07841642fa05@mail.gmail.com> <20080125234146.083449bd@sparrow> <560f92640801251505q39b178feh6aa51424c0dff13c@mail.gmail.com> <479A896C.2010001@onetel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: formatting disk for FreeBSD : Detecting IDE Primary Master ... [Press F4 to skip] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:03:37 -0000 > Some motherboards had an upper limit on hard disk size which I think was > 32gb. Some drives have a jumper to limit the apparent size to 32gb (if > that was the size). > > Also I no longer have hardware to test this on but if it is a BIOS > problem I believe if you could put the hard disk in a newer machine for > the install it would then boot in the older machine as FreeBSD accesses > the disk directly, not through the BIOS. > > When he puts that big hard drive back in the old computer, he still won't be able to boot because to boot the BIOS reads the MBR on the hard disk and passes control to that program. If BIOS can't recognize the disk, there is no possibility of booting. The initial stages of booting happen based on data on the hard disk. This is a chicken and egg problem. It boils down to the fact that BIOS needs to recognize the hard disk to be able to boot it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 20:25:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB60D16A418 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:25:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD06813C46A for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:25:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JIraI-0007B8-R4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:25:02 +0000 Received: from a80-100-101-148.adsl.xs4all.nl ([80.100.101.148]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:25:02 +0000 Received: from huubvanniekerk by a80-100-101-148.adsl.xs4all.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:25:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Huub Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:18:58 +0100 Lines: 31 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a80-100-101-148.adsl.xs4all.nl User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070811) Sender: news Subject: error while updating ports: x11/xorg-libraries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:25:09 -0000 Hi, After a quite some time of not using the machine, I decided to update a PentiumIII pc running FreeBSD 6.2. Starting with "portupgrade -R firefox" it ends with: [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 685 packages found (-0 +1) . done] ---> Skipping 'graphics/cairo' (cairo-1.4.10) because a requisite package 'xorg-libraries-7.2_1' (x11/xorg-libraries) failed (specify -k to force) ---> Skipping 'x11-toolkits/pango' (pango-1.16.5) because a requisite package 'cairo-1.4.10' (graphics/cairo) failed (specify -k to force) ---> Skipping 'x11-toolkits/gtk20' (gtk-2.10.14) because a requisite package 'pango-1.16.5' (x11-toolkits/pango) failed (specify -k to force) ---> Skipping 'www/firefox' (firefox-2.0.0.6,1) because a requisite package 'pango-1.16.5' (x11-toolkits/pango) failed (specify -k to force) ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! x11/xorg-libraries (xorg-libraries-7.2_1) (unknown build error) * graphics/cairo (cairo-1.4.10) * x11-toolkits/pango (pango-1.16.5) * x11-toolkits/gtk20 (gtk-2.10.14) * www/firefox (firefox-2.0.0.6,1) ---> Packages processed: 34 done, 61 ignored, 4 skipped and 1 failed So, starting to look for information about xorg-libraries, I've searched in /usr/ports/CHANGES, MOVED and UPDATING but found nothing. Can someone please tell me how to get on with this? Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 20:28:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA6716A47A for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:28:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (filter2-tmobile.zx.nl [194.187.76.139]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A3A13C46A for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:28:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.j.werven@student.utwente.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971571C72F6 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:28:48 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zx.nl Received: from filter2-tmobile.zx.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (filter2.zx.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10127) with ESMTP id whqieGbWC-WQ for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:28:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [91.141.230.244]) by filter2-tmobile.zx.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:28:26 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <479B97D9.3090601@student.utwente.nl> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:28:09 +0000 From: "Alphons \"Fonz\" van Werven" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [freebsd-questions] Vidcontrol woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:28:51 -0000 Okay, FreeBSD 6.3-RELEASE just got installed on the Toshiba laptop. But for some reason, I don't seem able to change the console video mode. The VESA module has of course been loaded and I did a "vidmode -i mode" but pretty much every mode I tried either turned the entire screen red (and completely screwed up) or it says "operation not supported by device". I'm pretty sure it should be possible to get, like, 132x43 or something. In fact, several Linux distros managed it. But I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong. Any thoughts? Alphons -- VISTA - Viruses Intruders Spyware Trojans Adware From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 20:37:51 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D66816A421 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:37:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674AB13C467 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:37:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from af300wsm@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so1943265waf.3 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:37:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=LdUVua1E+0MYctkZBPyKD4dYIQFF7ipiNLEeootdJiw=; b=j8IegTALTb76i3hpm5vw7bXB9E0559BOBPTZIoCA+LVe/E5UU/qJ8JMxoypELp8SEhHakEwjoIzgxjixeSDzBryEHXvdSo/1bd2pCa1pjsISrErDClaLTXugy9VKaPyrNUXE7hdTcocmavR1Ga5lvDKQKpZfVUyksyt3sOZoM8g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=eZ/KaaA0O4mFfgjllC8HPcaCqdrP9dKgCU931qUFNjgTwB+VJWrY5ryO6rLobJdi610Zf+BgsobrnbMGKyVb6YDNftqyO4LzzAL7Raa2QduQ+Is6i5huWTVCQUqB02wJlmZAmtPQv6l/nh2rc+moxdkEAS6xpa8XdAiBQBh/5eg= Received: by 10.115.88.1 with SMTP id q1mr1450975wal.98.1201379870863; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:37:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from sniper ( [71.221.182.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j21sm7578904wah.8.2008.01.26.12.37.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:37:50 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Falanga To: FreeBSD Questions Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 13:37:34 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200801261337.34750.af300wsm@gmail.com> Subject: Installing apache and it conflicts with a previously installed port, how to fix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:37:51 -0000 Hi, I'm installing apache 2.2 on my father's computer and got this error from the install of apache: ===> Installing for apache-2.2.8 ===> apache-2.2.8 conflicts with installed package(s): apr-db42-1.2.8_2 They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). As you can see, a recommended course of action is given here. I wanted to find out what apr-db42 is, or what depends upon it, before removal and got this: roadrunner# pkg_info -r apr-db42-1.2.8_2 Information for apr-db42-1.2.8_2: Depends on: Dependency: expat-2.0.0_1 Dependency: perl-5.8.8_1 Dependency: db42-4.2.52_5 Dependency: libiconv-1.9.2_2 Can I safely remove apr-db42-1.2.8_2 that using pkg_delete to complete the install of apache, or should I do something different? Thanks, Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 20:37:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B255816A417 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc5-cmbg1-0-0-cust497.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [86.6.1.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CAD213C4CC for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org) Received: from brick.slightlystrange.org (brick.slightlystrange.org [10.1.3.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by catflap.slightlystrange.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6AE1613F for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:37:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: (from danielby@localhost) by brick.slightlystrange.org (8.14.2/8.13.4/Submit) id m0QKbpZs003367 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:37:51 GMT (envelope-from freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org) Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:37:50 +0000 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080126203750.GA1122@brick.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 i386 Subject: Re: error while updating ports: x11/xorg-libraries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:37:54 -0000 --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 09:18:58PM +0100, Huub wrote: > Hi, >=20 > After a quite some time of not using the machine, I decided to update a= =20 > PentiumIII pc running FreeBSD 6.2. Starting with "portupgrade -R=20 > firefox" it ends with: >=20 > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 685 packages= =20 > found (-0 +1) . done] > ---> Skipping 'graphics/cairo' (cairo-1.4.10) because a requisite=20 > package 'xorg-libraries-7.2_1' (x11/xorg-libraries) failed (specify -k=20 > to force) > ---> Skipping 'x11-toolkits/pango' (pango-1.16.5) because a requisite=20 > package 'cairo-1.4.10' (graphics/cairo) failed (specify -k to force) > ---> Skipping 'x11-toolkits/gtk20' (gtk-2.10.14) because a requisite=20 > package 'pango-1.16.5' (x11-toolkits/pango) failed (specify -k to force) > ---> Skipping 'www/firefox' (firefox-2.0.0.6,1) because a requisite=20 > package 'pango-1.16.5' (x11-toolkits/pango) failed (specify -k to force) > ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) > ! x11/xorg-libraries (xorg-libraries-7.2_1) (unknown build=20 > error) > * graphics/cairo (cairo-1.4.10) > * x11-toolkits/pango (pango-1.16.5) > * x11-toolkits/gtk20 (gtk-2.10.14) > * www/firefox (firefox-2.0.0.6,1) > ---> Packages processed: 34 done, 61 ignored, 4 skipped and 1 failed >=20 > So, starting to look for information about xorg-libraries, I've searched= =20 > in /usr/ports/CHANGES, MOVED and UPDATING but found nothing. Can=20 > someone please tell me how to get on with this? First off, you should probably update your ports tree. Firefox is now at 2.0.0.11,1, and xorg-libraries is at 7.3_1. Then try the upgrade again. If it still fails, show us the errors from the xorg-libraries build. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHm5oeixf5fBYiFmoRAoVVAJwPp0GOHXu6Snd2U0Q0oXMmY8cOGwCgj45s 0ic6jkzZ9RX5qwlSAQE+smE= =qgFZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5vNYLRcllDrimb99-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 20:39:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED4516A417 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:39:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B991013C45D for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:39:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite ([24.166.217.200]) by hrndva-omta02.mail.rr.com with SMTP id <20080126203957.OJOQ10616.hrndva-omta02.mail.rr.com@satellite> for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:39:57 +0000 Message-ID: <000301c8605b$8968db20$0200a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:39:23 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Subject: nfs locking X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:39:59 -0000 Hello, I'm using nfs on freebsd 6.2 server and a freebsd 6.3 client. On both i have to implement nfs locking. I've added: rpc_lockd_enable="YES" rpc_statd_enable="YES" to both system's /etc/rc.conf. On the client i can start nfs_locking and both statd and lockd start. On the server when i start nfs_locking only statd starts, lockd does not. In /var/log/messages i'm seeing the error msg: nfslock: no such file or directory. Can anyone tell me what this file is and where to put it? Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 20:57:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EEE016A468 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:57:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21DA13C467 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:57:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JIs5d-0008Sl-T6 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:57:25 +0000 Received: from a80-100-101-148.adsl.xs4all.nl ([80.100.101.148]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:57:25 +0000 Received: from huubvanniekerk by a80-100-101-148.adsl.xs4all.nl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:57:25 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Huub Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 21:57:20 +0100 Lines: 32 Message-ID: References: <20080126203750.GA1122@brick.slightlystrange.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a80-100-101-148.adsl.xs4all.nl User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070811) In-Reply-To: <20080126203750.GA1122@brick.slightlystrange.org> Sender: news Subject: Re: error while updating ports: x11/xorg-libraries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:57:28 -0000 > > First off, you should probably update your ports tree. Firefox is now > at 2.0.0.11,1, and xorg-libraries is at 7.3_1. I started with updating the ports tree. > > Then try the upgrade again. If it still fails, show us the errors from > the xorg-libraries build. [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 685 packages found (-0 +1) . done] ---> Upgrading 'xorg-libraries-7.2_1' to 'xorg-libraries-7.3_1' (x11/xorg-libraries) ---> Building '/usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries' ===> Cleaning for xorg-libraries-7.3_1 /usr/X11R6 exists, but it is not a symlink. Installation cannot proceed. This looks like an incompletely removed old version of X. In the current version, /usr/X11R6 must be a symlink if it exists at all.Please read /usr/ports/UPDATING (entry of 20070519) for the procedure to upgrade X.org related ports.*** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade.15405.6 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=xorg-libraries-7.2_1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=7.2_1 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ------------------------------------ OK, so it looks like I have to update Xorg ports first. Reading UPDATING it seems quite a lot of work. Can you tell it will work out ok? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 23:09:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B1D16A417 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc5-cmbg1-0-0-cust497.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [86.6.1.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9547B13C442 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:09:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org) Received: from brick.slightlystrange.org (brick.slightlystrange.org [10.1.3.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by catflap.slightlystrange.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932C2610E for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:09:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: (from danielby@localhost) by brick.slightlystrange.org (8.14.2/8.13.4/Submit) id m0QN9qdt005187 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:09:52 GMT (envelope-from freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org) Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:09:52 +0000 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080126230952.GB1122@brick.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20080126203750.GA1122@brick.slightlystrange.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 i386 Subject: Re: error while updating ports: x11/xorg-libraries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:09:56 -0000 --OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 09:57:20PM +0100, Huub wrote: > > > >First off, you should probably update your ports tree. Firefox is now > >at 2.0.0.11,1, and xorg-libraries is at 7.3_1. >=20 > I started with updating the ports tree. >=20 > > > >Then try the upgrade again. If it still fails, show us the errors from > >the xorg-libraries build. >=20 > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 685 packages= =20 > found (-0 +1) . done] > ---> Upgrading 'xorg-libraries-7.2_1' to 'xorg-libraries-7.3_1'=20 > (x11/xorg-libraries) > ---> Building '/usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries' > =3D=3D=3D> Cleaning for xorg-libraries-7.3_1 > /usr/X11R6 exists, but it is not a symlink. Installation cannot proceed. > This looks like an incompletely removed old version of X. In the=20 > current version, /usr/X11R6 must be a symlink if it exists at all.Please= =20 > read /usr/ports/UPDATING (entry of 20070519) for the procedure to=20 > upgrade X.org related ports.*** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/xorg-libraries. > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa=20 > /tmp/portupgrade.15405.6 env UPGRADE_TOOL=3Dportupgrade=20 > UPGRADE_PORT=3Dxorg-libraries-7.2_1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=3D7.2_1 make > ** Fix the problem and try again. >=20 > ------------------------------------ >=20 > OK, so it looks like I have to update Xorg ports first. Reading UPDATING= =20 > it seems quite a lot of work. Can you tell it will work out ok? Hmm, how did you end up with 7.2 installed, with the old /usr/X11R6 dir? I thought that went away in the transition from 6.9 to 7.2... Anyhow, following Kris' instructions in UPDATING should see you through the upgrade OK. I did it quite painlessly on a few machines, although others did report difficulties. If it comes to it, you can uninstall all your X-related ports and do a clean install of Xorg 7.3 - it'll take a while, but it will get the job done. I hope it works out! Dan --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHm73Aixf5fBYiFmoRAnmMAJ9eq3VEL52y02C2gHOYZ7WBGaqgUwCeLirV det9OkIMWhTyBe+CEfEeywo= =uWEZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 26 23:27:38 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24DD16A419 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:27:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tethys.ocean@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE88613C455 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:27:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tethys.ocean@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so2022594waf.3 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:27:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=oo6Sg2r2Yqx3B22Bz2q1J1YEbOdavlK1DHsLnuYIzmo=; b=Azj12aeriHZASF7D2cGCUI5qrxGtpfCw8vrYE2DA9ZrmuhujIHxAPJsB08Y2JLlzcEhAwFebEsnScwgOQU/o12MmjHcXtBNEcKiDKkQB8HU2pLlQMpWLQuBnoV6Wd5Vvi0ZAfSHTyxpD8LfKGAI6NG4eMqwF8pimOb9niqwdFr0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=f4wFU4nN90uyogP2Zk509wvdrC3Iik/orPNSDG9hjvjJhrhTRveD99ylqVDhyXJsx0CpxgACFq18ushoqWjWz/8LU2zLCo/5s8CNpZL/XEYI0iRrVxy4419h+hgyjtdYwe0LlpAJKMkzdHEcE5kQzNROauLBGoGnh/oyCrgisQo= Received: by 10.142.131.18 with SMTP id e18mr1862726wfd.36.1201390058124; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:27:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.136.20 with HTTP; Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:27:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <235b80000801261527m282749dah2270ec691f7d9c75@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 01:27:38 +0200 From: "tethys ocean" To: FreeBSD_Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: ./iicbus_if.h: In function `IICBUS_TRANSFER': X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 23:27:38 -0000 Hi again . While I was being update another server which is 6.2 stable. make ./iicbus_if.h:124: warning: "struct iic_msg" declared inside parameter list ./iicbus_if.h:124: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want ./iicbus_if.h:127: warning: "struct iic_msg" declared inside parameter list ./iicbus_if.h: In function `IICBUS_TRANSFER': ./iicbus_if.h:131: warning: passing arg 2 of pointer to function from incompatible pointer type *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c/if_ic. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/i2c. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 : -- Share now a pigeon's flight Bluebound along the ancient skies, Its women forever hair and mammal, A Mediterranean town may arise If you rip apart a pigeon's heart.