From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 20 03:00:52 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68D4106566C for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 03:00:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B216E8FC0A for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 03:00:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id pAK30o62009905 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:00:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id pAK30of3009904; Sat, 19 Nov 2011 19:00:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA01420; Sat, 19 Nov 11 18:55:37 PST Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 01:55:18 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: wblock@wonkity.com Message-Id: <4ec8ce86.SUQIYIhDcM4XkICl%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <201111190050.05726.admin@vizion2000.net> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: epson printers on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 03:00:52 -0000 Warren Block wrote: > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, David Southwell wrote: > > Anyone up to date on how to do high quality printing with > > epson inkjet printers (in my case r2400 and r2880) on amd64 > > systems. print/pips* reports they require 386 and do not > > compile on amd64. > > print/gimp-gutenprint works pretty well from Gimp, although > I have not figured out how to get consistent color and brightness. > It supports both of those printers. I'm sure I'm not alone in doubting that _any_ ink-spitter is likely to produce "high quality printing" or "consistent color and brightness", regardless of the host support used. Those printers are designed to be manufactured as inexpensively as possible so as to be sold at very low prices, the profit being in the recurring ink sales. "Cheap" and "high quality" tend to be incompatible design goals. BTW, to the OP: a single posting, to a single list, would have been sufficient. I saw 4 postings of the same (or nearly the same) question, spread over 2 lists. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 20 09:16:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268E7106566C for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 09:16:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (dns1.vizion2000.net [62.49.197.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47038FC0C for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 09:16:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 17E26119C53; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:14:31 -0800 (PST) From: David Southwell Organization: Vision Communications To: perryh@pluto.rain.com Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:14:30 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-RELEASE; KDE/4.7.3; amd64; ; ) References: <201111190050.05726.admin@vizion2000.net> <4ec8ce86.SUQIYIhDcM4XkICl%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4ec8ce86.SUQIYIhDcM4XkICl%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201111200014.30960.david@vizion2000.net> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: epson printers on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 09:16:11 -0000 On Sunday 20 November 2011 01:55:18 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Warren Block wrote: > > On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, David Southwell wrote: > > > Anyone up to date on how to do high quality printing with > > > epson inkjet printers (in my case r2400 and r2880) on amd64 > > > systems. print/pips* reports they require 386 and do not > > > compile on amd64. > > > > print/gimp-gutenprint works pretty well from Gimp, although > > I have not figured out how to get consistent color and brightness. > > It supports both of those printers. > > I'm sure I'm not alone in doubting that _any_ ink-spitter is likely to > produce "high quality printing" or "consistent color and brightness", > regardless of the host support used. Those printers are designed to > be manufactured as inexpensively as possible so as to be sold at very > low prices, the profit being in the recurring ink sales. "Cheap" and > "high quality" tend to be incompatible design goals. Not so with epson 2400 and 2880 when properly profiled these professional printers produce salon quality prints and are not in any way comparable with inexpensive consumer "inkspitter" models - I think you are right as far as more economically priced printers are concerned. I have many prints produced on epson 2400, 2880 & larger epson printers accepted into international salons and received awards. So do make sure you know what you are ta;lking about and do not put all inkjet printers into an "inkspitter" category! You cannot however produce goood prints without profiling. > > BTW, to the OP: a single posting, to a single list, would have been > sufficient. I saw 4 postings of the same (or nearly the same) question, > spread over 2 lists. It was intentionally posted to the two relevant list - ports and emulation. Unfortunately the emulation list initially bounced the first post two attempts but then their server accepted them as well as the third - possibly a soft bounce interpreted as a hard or a hard bounce return instead of a soft. David From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 20 12:08:26 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA86106566C; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 12:08:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC618FC0A; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 12:08:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwe3 with SMTP id 3so3864360wwe.1 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 04:08:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=oLFJKVImX3jcqp/hUpbR+N9Yn1UYHOC540uL6skzA4Y=; b=UBHelIoMlI+e3A5r04Kdxg3cR2DYwohxhtd6KhO6FYCUmgHLeVIjSc45gVDSrsYOWw A7qa6Qqb9OU3U9qmy5A0YJVPX0bhdZ/6papIPn9e/6uQq/+fEEE1Z+yGPzJi6niD5SJg +h/6RtIqriB3K9jB4JpcWZFyQYT6DbAPMrLzQ= Received: by 10.216.133.12 with SMTP id p12mr1374322wei.99.1321790904914; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 04:08:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.dg (41-132-93-69.dsl.mweb.co.za. [41.132.93.69]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m25sm8512001wbp.6.2011.11.20.04.08.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 20 Nov 2011 04:08:24 -0800 (PST) From: David Naylor To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 14:08:51 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-RC2; KDE/4.7.1; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart15372081.GRjRsnDeFR"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201111201408.55611.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.3.33 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 12:08:26 -0000 --nextPart15372081.GRjRsnDeFR Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.3.33 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. =20 There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled world= =20 (help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects quite a few users= ). =20 The patch [3] for nVidia users is now included in the package and is run on= =20 installation (if the relevant files are accessable). Please read the=20 installation messages for further information. =20 Regards, David [1]=20 MD5 (freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.3.33,1.tbz) =3D a3eb5e2b32b8c7fa91e67aecee1cc= 197 MD5 (freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.3.33,1.txz) =3D 0a1b483fc8ee107653586aa56d464= 814 [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 [3] The patch is located at /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh --nextPart15372081.GRjRsnDeFR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk7I7dcACgkQUaaFgP9pFrIW9gCeMbHMMbw3/+C4RCG+H6a+fY/y GwoAn04eLkMDzwb9nDMN5YrcVsgsQyAI =DbKO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart15372081.GRjRsnDeFR-- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 20 18:03:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42121065672 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:03:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@mittelstaedt.us) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:fa80:40::6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D49D8FC20 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.64] (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAKI34nm095658 for ; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 10:03:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@mittelstaedt.us) Message-ID: <4EC940DA.2020900@mittelstaedt.us> Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 10:03:06 -0800 From: Ted Mittelstaedt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <201111190050.05726.admin@vizion2000.net> <4ec8ce86.SUQIYIhDcM4XkICl%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <201111200014.30960.david@vizion2000.net> In-Reply-To: <201111200014.30960.david@vizion2000.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=4.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com Subject: Re: epson printers on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:03:13 -0000 On 11/20/2011 12:14 AM, David Southwell wrote: > On Sunday 20 November 2011 01:55:18 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: >> Warren Block wrote: >>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, David Southwell wrote: >>>> Anyone up to date on how to do high quality printing with >>>> epson inkjet printers (in my case r2400 and r2880) on amd64 >>>> systems. print/pips* reports they require 386 and do not >>>> compile on amd64. >>> >>> print/gimp-gutenprint works pretty well from Gimp, although >>> I have not figured out how to get consistent color and brightness. >>> It supports both of those printers. >> >> I'm sure I'm not alone in doubting that _any_ ink-spitter is likely to >> produce "high quality printing" or "consistent color and brightness", >> regardless of the host support used. Those printers are designed to >> be manufactured as inexpensively as possible so as to be sold at very >> low prices, the profit being in the recurring ink sales. "Cheap" and >> "high quality" tend to be incompatible design goals. > Every printer out there is designed to be used in a business model where the profits are in recurring consumables sales. > > Not so with epson 2400 and 2880 when properly profiled these professional > printers produce salon quality prints and are not in any way comparable with > inexpensive consumer "inkspitter" models - I think you are right as far as > more economically priced printers are concerned. I have many prints produced > on epson 2400, 2880& larger epson printers accepted into international salons > and received awards. I have a cheaper Epson inkjet myself that uses the same ink setup as the more expensive ones your referring to and produces similar quality photos. The main difference between it and the more expensive inkjets is the paper control, in the better printers the paper is much more securely held and less likely to slip during printing. However, despite the fact that inkjets can be manufactured to produce excellent output, the caveat is that it is all in the ink. You cannot get high quality output from an inkjet with standard water-soluble inks, that's why the epson output is so good, because they use petroleum-based inks. However, the oil based inks WILL clog the printhead unless the printer is used frequently. The industry experimented with wax-based inks for a while, those also produce excellent output, but the printers also will clog unless they are used every day. I myself buy aftermarket water-soluble ink cartridges that are a drop-in replacement for the Epson cartridges, and do not clog, and are much cheaper. Print quality is lower, though. These printers are totally unsuitable for the average consumer who just wants to print a picture once every few months. Furthermore the cost-per-page is far higher than the current crop of inexpensive color laserjet printers, that is due to Epson using very small ink cartridges. Epson does that because larger cartridges have more mass and more mass has more inertia and is harder to control. Getting back to the original question, if your going to drop $500 into a professional quality inkjet and at least that every year into consumables for it in order to print pro-quality pictures on a regular basis, then setup an older extra 32-bit Intel-based PC as a print server and send Postscript jobs to it over the network, and have it convert them to whatever language the printer uses. Ted From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 21 10:02:10 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB9E1065674 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (dns1.vizion2000.net [62.49.197.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0818FC15 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:02:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 9528F119C54; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:40:34 -0800 (PST) From: David Southwell Organization: Vizion Communications To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:40:34 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-RELEASE; KDE/4.7.3; amd64; ; ) References: <201111190050.05726.admin@vizion2000.net> <201111200014.30960.david@vizion2000.net> <4EC940DA.2020900@mittelstaedt.us> In-Reply-To: <4EC940DA.2020900@mittelstaedt.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201111210040.34482.admin@vizion2000.net> Cc: Subject: Re: epson printers on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: david@vizion2000.net List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 10:02:10 -0000 On Sunday 20 November 2011 10:03:06 Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > On 11/20/2011 12:14 AM, David Southwell wrote: > > On Sunday 20 November 2011 01:55:18 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > >> Warren Block wrote: > >>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2011, David Southwell wrote: > >>>> Anyone up to date on how to do high quality printing with > >>>> epson inkjet printers (in my case r2400 and r2880) on amd64 > >>>> systems. print/pips* reports they require 386 and do not > >>>> compile on amd64. > >>> > >>> print/gimp-gutenprint works pretty well from Gimp, although > >>> I have not figured out how to get consistent color and brightness. > >>> It supports both of those printers. > >> > >> I'm sure I'm not alone in doubting that _any_ ink-spitter is likely to > >> produce "high quality printing" or "consistent color and brightness", > >> regardless of the host support used. Those printers are designed to > >> be manufactured as inexpensively as possible so as to be sold at very > >> low prices, the profit being in the recurring ink sales. "Cheap" and > >> "high quality" tend to be incompatible design goals. > > Every printer out there is designed to be used in a business model where > the profits are in recurring consumables sales. > > > Not so with epson 2400 and 2880 when properly profiled these professional > > printers produce salon quality prints and are not in any way comparable > > with inexpensive consumer "inkspitter" models - I think you are right as > > far as more economically priced printers are concerned. I have many > > prints produced on epson 2400, 2880& larger epson printers accepted > > into international salons and received awards. > > I have a cheaper Epson inkjet myself that uses the same ink setup as the > more expensive ones your referring to and produces similar quality > photos. The main difference between it and the more expensive inkjets > is the paper control, in the better printers the paper is much more > securely held and less likely to slip during printing. > > However, despite the fact that inkjets can be manufactured to produce > excellent output, the caveat is that it is all in the ink. You cannot > get high quality output from an inkjet with standard water-soluble > inks, that's why the epson output is so good, because they use > petroleum-based inks. However, the oil based inks WILL clog the > printhead unless the printer is used frequently. The industry > experimented with wax-based inks for a while, those also produce > excellent output, but the printers also will clog unless they are > used every day. I myself buy aftermarket water-soluble ink cartridges > that are a drop-in replacement for the Epson cartridges, and do > not clog, and are much cheaper. Print quality is lower, though. The alternative to cartridges is to use a high quality inkflow system. I agree the quality of the ink is really significant. If you want to get the best results then use pigment inks. > > These printers are totally unsuitable for the average consumer who just > wants to print a picture once every few months. Furthermore the > cost-per-page is far higher than the current crop of inexpensive > color laserjet printers, that is due to Epson using very small ink > cartridges. Epson does that because larger cartridges have more mass > and more mass has more inertia and is harder to control. Again the inkflow systems reduce the mass. I have solve the tendency for nozzle blockages by adding 2% proproponol to my bulk pigment ink supplies. The cost of high quality ink bought in bulk using an ink flow system gives me a reduction of 80% of the cost of Epson Cartridges plus a much longer print head life and a quality that is at least equal to using epson cartridges. > > Getting back to the original question, if your going to drop $500 into > a professional quality inkjet and at least that every year into > consumables for it in order to print pro-quality pictures on a regular > basis, then setup an older extra 32-bit Intel-based PC as a print server > and send Postscript jobs to it over the network, and have it > convert them to whatever language the printer uses. > I agree that would be a solution but a more sensible, and less energy consuming alternative would be a 64bit compliant driver! It is nuts not to have one! david From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 21 11:07:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FDBD106566C for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:07:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04D658FC1A for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pALB71AV053534 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:07:01 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pALB714x053529 for freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:07:01 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:07:01 GMT Message-Id: <201111211107.pALB714x053529@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:07:02 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/159646 emulation [linux] [patch] bump Linux version in linuxulator f kern/156691 emulation [vmware] [panic] panic when using hard disks as RAW de o kern/156353 emulation [ibcs2] ibcs2 binaries that execute on 4.x not working o kern/155577 emulation [boot] BTX halted after install. Reboot during install o kern/155040 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux recvfrom doesn't handle proto fa o kern/153990 emulation [hyper-v]: Will not install into Hyper-V on Server 200 o kern/153887 emulation [linux] Linux emulator not understand STB_GNU_UNIQUE b o kern/153243 emulation [ibcs2] Seg fault whne running COFF binary using iBCS2 o kern/151714 emulation [linux] print/acroread9 not usable due to lack of supp a bin/150262 emulation [patch] truss(1) -f doesn't follow descendants of the a kern/150186 emulation [parallels] [panic] Parallels Desktop: CDROM disconnec o ports/148097 emulation [patch] suggested addition to linux_base-* packages to o ports/148096 emulation emulators/linux_base-* can not be built from ports on o kern/147793 emulation [vmware] [panic] cdrom handling, panic, possible race o kern/146237 emulation [linux] Linux binaries not reading directories mounted p kern/144584 emulation [linprocfs][patch] bogus values in linprocfs o ports/142837 emulation [patch] emulators/linux_base-* packages fails to insta o kern/140156 emulation [linux] cdparanoia fails to read drive data f kern/138944 emulation [parallels] [regression] Parallels no longer works in o kern/138880 emulation [linux] munmap segfaults after linux_mmap2 stresstest o ports/135337 emulation [PATCH] emulators/linux_base-f10: incorrect bash usage s kern/133144 emulation [linux] linuxulator 2.6 crashes with nvidias libGL.so. o kern/129169 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux Emulation ENOTCONN error using n o kern/126232 emulation [linux] Linux ioctl TCGETS (0x5401) always fails o kern/86619 emulation [linux] linux emulator interacts oddly with cp a kern/72920 emulation [linux] path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain so o kern/41543 emulation [patch] [request] easier wine/w23 support o kern/39201 emulation [linux] [patch] ptrace(2) and rfork(RFLINUXTHPN) confu o kern/36952 emulation [patch] [linux] ldd(1) command of linux does not work o kern/11165 emulation [ibcs2] IBCS2 doesn't work correctly with PID_MAX 9999 30 problems total. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 21 13:07:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 182AC106564A for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:07:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (dns1.vizion2000.net [62.49.197.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD538FC08 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 945DF119C26; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:06:16 -0800 (PST) From: David Southwell Organization: Vizion Communications To: emulation@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 04:06:16 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-RELEASE; KDE/4.7.3; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201111210406.16414.admin@vizion2000.net> Cc: Subject: loading linux 32 bit printer drivers possible on amd64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: david@vizion2000.net List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:07:59 -0000 HI I am wondering if there is any way of using the linux version of print/pips* drivers for epson printers on freebsd8.2. As they stand prints/pip* tree will not compile on amd64 systems (I have tried commenting out the i386 only in the relevant Makefile). This may be due to assembler code in cbtd_wrapper and possibly other issues. It would be very useful to have all print/pips available for amd64 and am wondering if any emulation gurus may be able to find a way of making them operative using the linux distribution. Thanks is advance David From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 22 15:28:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899131065676 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:28:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (dns1.vizion2000.net [62.49.197.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465DA8FC1D for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1004) id EA352119C26; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 06:26:42 -0800 (PST) From: David Southwell Organization: Vision Communications To: Alexander Leidinger Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 06:26:42 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.2-RELEASE; KDE/4.7.3; amd64; ; ) References: <2oo1sxdw453s3rfwf1rynkvl.1321961025650@email.android.com> In-Reply-To: <2oo1sxdw453s3rfwf1rynkvl.1321961025650@email.android.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201111220626.42817.david@vizion2000.net> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: loading linux 32 bit printer drivers possible on amd64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:28:27 -0000 On Tuesday 22 November 2011 03:24:24 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Hi, > > why not with the freebsd32 emulation? This is one emulation layer less to > care about. I do not know if this is feasible, I haven't looked if pips > has some libs and where they shall be put, but as a first try you could > extract the contents of the pips packages and put them into the 32bit > locations. > > Bye, > Alexander. Hi OK sounds sensibel but how do I get there? I do not have a compat/freebsd32 directory. I do have /usr/src/compat/freebsd32. Is freebsd32 a kernel install option or can it be added without rebuilding the kernel? Thanks in advance David From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 22 17:18:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380521065675 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:18:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scoobi_doo@yahoo.com) Received: from nm27.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm27.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.212.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D77FA8FC0C for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.212.145] by nm27.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Nov 2011 17:04:55 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.204] by tm2.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Nov 2011 17:04:55 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1013.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Nov 2011 17:04:55 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 837353.73383.bm@omp1013.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 86384 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Nov 2011 17:04:55 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1321981495; bh=KkLUEX/jRjHAaX4YW/szUmMK8kvcHqBvx/d+Rc+mp9s=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=LUEhc20gwU0g2i4PkzY4V3k4P0mcOaCbAt+unjSi+4HWMnYKI/X8Q+WYRmgzb3b8rp5Zlx8+p2bWrLfWumTcuPwBZbq1eHC2TCtEUBlz5HsmIstrVCYNPeB1zJjeLx8dK+VHj4phvQV/RazPXW9Unhmi33RyMwTB//2EJ2IX8Cc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=VLYAYi5XGHkaDgVTcjE4imgkl7QDbMT5EwWnmqotwErgABkGt6kkvPTqj2vsOpyk8g66i2LaLHT6c0dDpkgljciUu+MLKJkhsbinUKi7JLr6xG90AV0LoceOUCpiHfQ9DMo9Nm8EBQU4WWLQ+5Z/64WKb4A3bcDbMtD+BND8Kmg=; X-YMail-OSG: GaSwQyIVM1n2xt_EmUtOG5BYulcvGX3SCJEN2vg03rgEXuc 8H85XenbKzhDjaoO1BaWrawFYHHbNTauXAmJj5QvsZ7YJzDLibySULfD5l4p jcgKhkPy1Uu4bcWHGjdWPSuaw8HVhfYieAR5RatCKwH_OzoEtfb57JAaDe6B CTABPMiNLfLcRkM4LuKOd49ulaJbuWKv_cQVLhgiXLc2N74qmjZbhLrDrGrY 8DJpWjUFQAKA9T468HGjUaAQAXm.RoMZDaKf9FwIDEfRns9NzKWcGd2Zlbnx owP8cNULHMoR1L7glxwf.wGAXJlD8hqK4g2fu7aPKX9hF_nVnSndcZHCfSDu QU1nZSxr.r2ervLZjVStS6wzKIZczZ20Kogkb4xfYx28wmaT81BzXA7dXesC c6n1krqdgNe4Sptcs.zh9CsIaZcZD3LjRlXJjAZFgu2lixvt81Y8xV00XokZ eVBeyZVWvBCVMUXhgotas.pQTVByKjJ_ul.s.eE_1k24lcngM1cpz_OBp10D ucO.1guVx4yG2YvCE0zNqzZdPyf.pyc8UtELGph7Irp2KmNILgoMdtX0ckJD .bQ-- Received: from [64.102.249.6] by web39303.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:04:55 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.115.331698 References: <2oo1sxdw453s3rfwf1rynkvl.1321961025650@email.android.com> <201111220626.42817.david@vizion2000.net> Message-ID: <1321981495.82428.YahooMailNeo@web39303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 09:04:55 -0800 (PST) From: Anthony Jenkins To: David Southwell , Alexander Leidinger In-Reply-To: <201111220626.42817.david@vizion2000.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "emulation@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: loading linux 32 bit printer drivers possible on amd64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Anthony Jenkins List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:18:31 -0000 You might try reusing a portion of the steps used by freebsd-emulation to b= uild a 32-bit Wine (http://www.winehq.org/) for amd64:=0A=0Ahttp://wiki.fre= ebsd.org/Wine#Wine_on_FreeBSD.2BAC8-amd64=0A=0AAnthony Jenkins=0A=0A>______= __________________________=0A> From: David Southwell = =0A>To: Alexander Leidinger =0A>Cc: emulation@fre= ebsd.org =0A>Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 9:26 AM=0A>Subject: Re: loadi= ng linux 32 bit printer drivers possible on amd64?=0A> =0A>On Tuesday 22 No= vember 2011 03:24:24 Alexander Leidinger wrote:=0A>> Hi,=0A>> =0A>> why not= with the freebsd32 emulation? This is one emulation layer less to=0A>> car= e about. I do not know if this is feasible, I haven't looked if pips=0A>> h= as some libs and where they shall be put, but as a first try you could=0A>>= extract the contents of the pips packages and put them into the 32bit=0A>>= locations.=0A>> =0A>> Bye,=0A>> Alexander.=0A>Hi=0A>=0A>OK=A0 sounds sensi= bel but how do I get there?=0A>=0A>I do not have a compat/freebsd32 directo= ry. I do have =0A>/usr/src/compat/freebsd32.=0A>=0A>Is freebsd32 a kernel i= nstall option or can it be added without rebuilding the =0A>kernel?=0A>=0A>= Thanks in advance=0A>=0A>David=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>=0A>_____________________= __________________________=0A>freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list=0A= >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation=0A>To unsubscr= ibe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"=0A>=0A>= =0A> From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 23 08:47:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8A0106566B for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:47:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de) Received: from host.omnilan.net (s1.omnilan.net [62.245.232.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214BF8FC13 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:47:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from titan.wdn.omnilan.net (titan.lo4.wdn.omnilan.net [172.21.1.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by host.omnilan.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAN8YW1J012983 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:34:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de) X-Authentication-Warning: smtp.dmz.omnisec.de: Host titan.lo4.wdn.omnilan.net [172.21.1.150] claimed to be titan.wdn.omnilan.net Message-ID: <4ECCB00C.2090308@omnilan.de> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:34:20 +0100 From: Harald Schmalzbauer Organization: OmniLAN User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; de-DE; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100906 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: CALBk6yJrHniVi8RoTGwLtqWF1nL1r8JZLKbS1mcLMw1DnxeofQ@mail.gmail.com X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig71249FD1A4A9263D413CB661" Subject: mount vdi on host X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:47:38 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig71249FD1A4A9263D413CB661 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I'm not subscribed, so I'm not sure this answer will make it onto the list... I found your thread "mount vdi on host" and was told about 'gnop' and 'VBoxManage internalcommands dumphdinfo'. That was the key to success, so I'd like to answer the last question of the thread, when mounting didn't work: "Any more idea" ... Yes You forgot that md0.nop is the disk, not the filesystem. You probably have partitions on it, so when it comes to 'mount' you have to use /dev/md0nops1a for example (verified with md3.nops1 and mount_msdosfs). Hope this helps and thanks for the post! -Harry Original thread, found via search engine at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2011-July/008995.htm= l --- On Mon, 7/25/11, Brandon Gooch wrote= : From: Brandon Gooch Subject: Re: mount vdi To: "Andrey V. Elsukov" Cc: "Joe Sciulli" , freebsd-emulation at freebsd.org, nox at jelal.kn-bremen.de Date: Monday, July 25, 2011, 4:31 PM 2011/7/25 Andrey V. Elsukov : > On 25.07.2011 10:18, Joe Sciulli wrote: >> Is it possible to mount virtualbox vdi file on the FreeBSD host? This appears to be doable on >> windows and linux hosts, which basically is done in two steps: 1. find offset in the image. 2. >> mount the image with that offset. >> >> I'm trying to do the same thing on FreeBSD, and found the undocumented and deprecated command >> still works: >> >> VBoxManage internalcommands dumphdinfo freebsd_home.vdi >> >> I got the following for the virtual disk image holding the /home (no root hence no MBR) disk for >> a FreeBSD guest: >> >> Header: offBlocks=3D4096 offData=3D28672 >> >> Then attempt to mount it: >> >> mdconfig -a -t vnode -f /tmp/freebsd_home_56.vdi -u 0 mount /dev/md0 /tmp/aaa/ mount -t cd9660 /dev/md0 /tmp/aaa/ >> >> unfortunately both the above two mount commands failed with "Invalid argument". I tried >> skip=3D28672 to no avail as well. Anything did I do wrong? > > I have not any Vbox images with fixed size, but i tried this: > # mdconfig -f 10G_GPT_UFS.vdi > # gnop create -v -o 41472 /dev/md0 > > where 41472 is offData value. After that md0.nop was tasted and reports about invalid GPT. > So, i think if your image is fixed size disk yout can try this method and mount UFS (not cd9660). > > -- > WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov There was a CFT sent out a while back about a fuse module for mounting vdi images: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation/2010-September/00796= 4.html Not sure about the state of this now though... -Brandon Thanks for your replies. I tried mdconfig -f freebsd_home.vdi gnop create -v -o 28672 /dev/md0 Indeed /dev/md0.nop etc were created. But mounting with the following commands still yielded the dreaded "Invalid argument" error: mount /dev/md0.nop /tmp/aaa/ mount -t ufs /dev/md0.nop /tmp/aaa/ One thing interesting is, in the gnop command, if I change 28672 to anything else such as 28671 or 28673 or whatever, that gnop command would fail with: gnop: Invalid offset for provider md0. so that suggests the offset is correct. It's just that how to mount it. The vdi is a variable size disk in virtualbox. But I had shutdown virtualbox and copied it to another file before mdconfig on it. I looked closer at virtualbox-ose-fuse.shar Brandon linked, it appears to be hardcoded to work with VirtualBox-3.2.8-OSE, while I only have VBoxGuestAdditions_4.0.12 as in the ports tree. Any more idea, thanks. --------------enig71249FD1A4A9263D413CB661 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk7MsBgACgkQLDqVQ9VXb8i/ZQCfSoZA1QR2J1iuKJ4TbIxzmZ3k d60AoLee9/eYuFzyuB1mWiBGReCZjENZ =QhMO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig71249FD1A4A9263D413CB661-- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 23 20:41:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F9F1065673 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:41:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de) Received: from avocado.salatschuessel.net (avocado.salatschuessel.net [78.111.72.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E89868FC0C for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 37511 invoked by uid 80); 23 Nov 2011 20:15:03 -0000 Received: from dsdf-4db552eb.pool.mediaWays.net (dsdf-4db552eb.pool.mediaWays.net [77.181.82.235]) by avocado.salatschuessel.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:15:03 +0100 Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:15:03 +0100 Message-ID: <20111123211503.Horde.S6flaqQd9PdOzVRHV09ApsA@avocado.salatschuessel.net> From: Oliver Lehmann To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H4 (5.0.14) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: sound to fast / to slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 20:41:46 -0000 Hi, last weekend I installed VirtualBox 4.1.6 on Windows 7/64 Bit and set up an FreeBSD 9.0/amd64 host. Today I tried sound and it worked instantly :) But there is one problem I encountered: - Using "ICH AC97" sound emulation from VirtualBox and mpg321 (or audacious) plays a mp3 much to fast - Using "Intel HD Audio" sound emulation from VirtualBox and mpg321 (or audacious) plays a mp3 a little bit to slow - Using "Soundblaster 16" sound emulation does not work (tried loading snd_sb16.ko) Any idea how I could get the right "sound speed" in VirtualBox? Greetings, Oliver PS: please keep me CCed. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 24 03:57:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C39691065670 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 03:57:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583F58FC13 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 03:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by faap15 with SMTP id p15so3480314faa.13 for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:57:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=z09pTrcw/vkwaqRNZ3Y9xI0toydsu+afMGf09U9M1A8=; b=kviX8ZTWwnXoA9mlT3ITcPYS7TE47u1j3PfV9NhXAg+YEWGVRzsmqQtGLgr8u1wS0N xj/YaTXfx+RXHDNuNsjWsks/gY/GWT+UHRRoqhPWqCDvhTIckqV5r5Ip7OmH+AXFxgv7 4rLBM8KPmzkl1EDH6NcUWwvMbewD+hCeknSec= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.149.89 with SMTP id s25mr15580291bkv.47.1322107054134; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:57:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.83.14 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 19:57:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20111123211503.Horde.S6flaqQd9PdOzVRHV09ApsA@avocado.salatschuessel.net> References: <20111123211503.Horde.S6flaqQd9PdOzVRHV09ApsA@avocado.salatschuessel.net> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 21:57:34 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Oliver Lehmann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sound to fast / to slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 03:57:35 -0000 On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Oliver Lehmann wrote: > But there is one problem I encountered: > - Using "ICH AC97" sound emulation from VirtualBox and mpg321 > (or audacious) plays a mp3 much to fast > - Using "Intel HD Audio" sound emulation from VirtualBox and > mpg321 (or audacious) plays a mp3 a little bit to slow > - Using "Soundblaster 16" sound emulation does not work (tried > loading snd_sb16.ko) > > Any idea how I could get the right "sound speed" in VirtualBox? > > Greetings, Oliver > > PS: please keep me CCed. > Have you tried playing around with the system timer? Just a guess, but perhaps something as simple changing clocksource of the host might help. There are also some per-VM settings in regard to this. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 24 09:51:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202541065670 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:51:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lehmann@ans-netz.de) Received: from avocado.salatschuessel.net (avocado.salatschuessel.net [78.111.72.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 623178FC22 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64440 invoked by uid 80); 24 Nov 2011 09:51:41 -0000 Received: from 164.61.223.12 ([164.61.223.12]) by avocado.salatschuessel.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:51:41 +0100 Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:51:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20111124105141.Horde.lhAMDaQd9PdOzhOtDk6p5iA@avocado.salatschuessel.net> From: Oliver Lehmann To: Adam Vande More References: <20111123211503.Horde.S6flaqQd9PdOzVRHV09ApsA@avocado.salatschuessel.net> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H4 (5.0.14) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sound to fast / to slow X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:51:44 -0000 Hi Adam, Adam Vande More wrote: > Have you tried playing around with the system timer? Just a guess, but > perhaps something as simple changing clocksource of the host might help. What do you mean exactly by this? I could maybe change kern.timecounter.hardware in the FreeBSD guest (have to check if I have choices), but I would not know how to change the clocksource of the Windows-Host...? > There are also some per-VM settings in regard to this. Which and where? From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 25 12:36:04 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E57D7106566B for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:36:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gperez@entel.upc.edu) Received: from violet.upc.es (violet.upc.es [147.83.2.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7578FC17 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:36:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ackerman2.upc.es (ackerman2.upc.es [147.83.2.244]) by violet.upc.es (8.14.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id pAPAu4Lt014004 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:56:05 +0100 Received: from portgus.lan ([147.83.40.234]) (authenticated bits=0) by ackerman2.upc.es (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAPAu15V008265 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:56:04 +0100 Message-ID: <4ECF7440.4070300@entel.upc.edu> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:56:00 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gustau_P=E9rez?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111111 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.70 on 147.83.2.244 X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (violet.upc.es [147.83.2.51]); Fri, 25 Nov 2011 11:56:05 +0100 (CET) Subject: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464} X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:36:05 -0000 Hi, I'm seeing freezes with AMD64/CURRENT r227817 (as of Nov 22th). The machine freezes hard when starting a virtual machine. It used work a few weeks ago. I've been using Bernhard's from a lot of time. 4.1.4 from a month ago freezes. I had to apply the patch to fix the D_PSEUDO problem. I see it was posted in the vbox mailing lists and commited upstream. So I yesterday picked last virtualbox-port.tar.gz version at http://svn.bluelife.at/nightlies. 4.1.6 included there also freezes the machine. So I recompiled the kernel with WITNESS, DEADLKRES and friends I see a deadlock. This is the trace I got in my messages after rebooting the machine: Nov 25 08:57:06 portgus kernel: acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "IPRT Fast Mutex Semaphore" Nov 25 08:57:06 portgus kernel: acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "IPRT Fast Mutex Semaphore" Nov 25 08:57:06 portgus kernel: 1st IPRT Fast Mutex Semaphore @ \ /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/work/VirtualBox-4.1.6_OSE/out/freebsd.amd64/release/bin/src/vboxdrv/r0drv/freebsd/semfastmutex-r0drv-freebsd.c:100 I don't know if I'll have time to check this. I will try the versions in the ports tree (4.012?) but if it works it will allow us to work until 4.1.X gets into the tree. Any help will be appreciated. Gustau From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 25 12:50:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E366106566B for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:50:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imb@protected-networks.net) Received: from sarah.protected-networks.net (sarah.protected-networks.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:4e1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCBE8FC1B for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from toshi.auburn.protected-networks.net (toshi.auburn.protected-networks.net [202.12.127.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Iain Butler", Issuer "RSA Class 2 Personal CA" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: imb@protected-networks.net) by sarah.protected-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 088B16160; Fri, 25 Nov 2011 07:50:15 -0500 (EST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=200509; d=protected-networks.net; c=nofws; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kcr9R3AeOFtdYpERi4EaAS8eIwFygaSN+KdmrlAt8NWSfPE83KJ79HA8oAjj/Nk1e qU2t+4rRBA9E8jqGEg9uNQxdDuLMMCCQzpD+1qTbc2QvDjzH6psN7VTv2JWECle Message-ID: <4ECF8F05.8000007@protected-networks.net> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 07:50:13 -0500 From: Michael Butler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111111 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gustau_P=E9rez?= References: <4ECF7440.4070300@entel.upc.edu> In-Reply-To: <4ECF7440.4070300@entel.upc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464} X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 12:50:18 -0000 On 11/25/11 05:56, Gustau Pérez wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm seeing freezes with AMD64/CURRENT r227817 (as of Nov 22th). The > machine freezes hard when starting a virtual machine. It used work a few > weeks ago. > > I've been using Bernhard's from a lot of time. 4.1.4 from a month ago > freezes. I had to apply the patch to fix the D_PSEUDO problem. I see it > was posted in the vbox mailing lists and commited upstream. So I > yesterday picked last virtualbox-port.tar.gz version at > http://svn.bluelife.at/nightlies. 4.1.6 included there also freezes the > machine. > > So I recompiled the kernel with WITNESS, DEADLKRES and friends I see a > deadlock. This is the trace I got in my messages after rebooting the > machine: > > Nov 25 08:57:06 portgus kernel: acquiring duplicate lock of same type: > "IPRT Fast Mutex Semaphore" > Nov 25 08:57:06 portgus kernel: acquiring duplicate lock of same type: > "IPRT Fast Mutex Semaphore" > Nov 25 08:57:06 portgus kernel: 1st IPRT Fast Mutex Semaphore @ \ > /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/work/VirtualBox-4.1.6_OSE/out/freebsd.amd64/release/bin/src/vboxdrv/r0drv/freebsd/semfastmutex-r0drv-freebsd.c:100 > > > I don't know if I'll have time to check this. I will try the versions in > the ports tree (4.012?) but if it works it will allow us to work until > 4.1.X gets into the tree. This appears to be related to recent changes in the locking mechanisms - specifically, SVN r227758 and r227788. I have not had time to explore further :-( imb From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 26 10:48:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07DA1065670 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:48:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gperez@entel.upc.edu) Received: from dash.upc.es (dash.upc.es [147.83.2.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C648FC0A for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:48:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ackerman2.upc.es (ackerman2.upc.es [147.83.2.244]) by dash.upc.es (8.14.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id pAQAmrjJ003848 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 26 Nov 2011 11:48:54 +0100 Received: from portgus.lan ([80.31.114.86]) (authenticated bits=0) by ackerman2.upc.es (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAQAmm6p011018 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 26 Nov 2011 11:48:53 +0100 Message-ID: <4ED0C40D.5010307@entel.upc.edu> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 11:48:45 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gustau_P=E9rez?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111111 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Butler References: <4ECF7440.4070300@entel.upc.edu> <4ECF8F05.8000007@protected-networks.net> In-Reply-To: <4ECF8F05.8000007@protected-networks.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.70 on 147.83.2.244 X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (dash.upc.es [147.83.2.50]); Sat, 26 Nov 2011 11:48:54 +0100 (CET) Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464} X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:48:57 -0000 >> machine: >> >> Nov 25 08:57:06 portgus kernel: acquiring duplicate lock of same type: >> "IPRT Fast Mutex Semaphore" >> Nov 25 08:57:06 portgus kernel: acquiring duplicate lock of same type: >> "IPRT Fast Mutex Semaphore" >> Nov 25 08:57:06 portgus kernel: 1st IPRT Fast Mutex Semaphore @ \ >> /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod/work/VirtualBox-4.1.6_OSE/out/freebsd.amd64/release/bin/src/vboxdrv/r0drv/freebsd/semfastmutex-r0drv-freebsd.c:100 >> >> >> >> I don't know if I'll have time to check this. I will try the versions in >> the ports tree (4.012?) but if it works it will allow us to work until >> 4.1.X gets into the tree. > > This appears to be related to recent changes in the locking mechanisms - > specifically, SVN r227758 and r227788. I have not had time to explore > further :-( > I've been checking those revisions and all they do is offer a new interface by generalizing the definition of functions already there. The old interface will use the new functions (the new interface are of the form like sx_lock_(), the older ones like sx_xlock will expand to sx_xlock_() which will expand to _sx_xlock or __sx_xlock as they did previously). So perhaps I'm missing something (I just took a brief look at the code) but I fear they are not the problem. I will try an older kernel (as the problem has to with sx I'm going to try with r227785) just in case. Moreover I see some discussion in freebsd-ports@ at the of October related to the D_PSEUDO issue where one posters made Virtualbox to work but reported a dmesg where I can the same messages I have. At that time the new {sx|mx} interface wasn't there. Will report my findings soon... From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 26 12:19:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9B4A1065673 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 12:19:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gperez@entel.upc.edu) Received: from violet.upc.es (violet.upc.es [147.83.2.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFAE8FC18 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 12:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ackerman2.upc.es (ackerman2.upc.es [147.83.2.244]) by violet.upc.es (8.14.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id pAQCJst4026980 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sat, 26 Nov 2011 13:19:54 +0100 Received: from portgus.lan ([80.31.114.86]) (authenticated bits=0) by ackerman2.upc.es (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAQCJokj024806 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 26 Nov 2011 13:19:54 +0100 Message-ID: <4ED0D963.1030702@entel.upc.edu> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 13:19:47 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gustau_P=E9rez?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111111 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Butler References: <4ECF7440.4070300@entel.upc.edu> <4ECF8F05.8000007@protected-networks.net> <4ED0C40D.5010307@entel.upc.edu> In-Reply-To: <4ED0C40D.5010307@entel.upc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.70 on 147.83.2.244 X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (violet.upc.es [147.83.2.51]); Sat, 26 Nov 2011 13:19:55 +0100 (CET) Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464} X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 12:19:58 -0000 > > I've been checking those revisions and all they do is offer a new > interface by generalizing the definition of functions already there. The > old interface will use the new functions (the new interface are of the > form like sx_lock_(), the older ones like sx_xlock will expand to > sx_xlock_() which will expand to _sx_xlock or __sx_xlock as they did > previously). So perhaps I'm missing something (I just took a brief look > at the code) but I fear they are not the problem. > > I will try an older kernel (as the problem has to with sx I'm going to > try with r227785) just in case. > > Moreover I see some discussion in freebsd-ports@ at the of October > related to the D_PSEUDO issue where one posters made Virtualbox to work > but reported a dmesg where I can the same messages I have. At that time > the new {sx|mx} interface wasn't there. > > Will report my findings soon... > _______________________________________________ Starting Virtualbox in the console in headless mode allows to see what happens and get a dump of the panic. The messages I got were not the cause problem. The panic I was able to get shows this: http://pastebin.com/dHnB3Xh0 I can't get any further with core although I compiled virtualbox-ose-kmod with debug symbols (I used make config to enable them, because I think -DWITH_DEBUG does not work because kmk is used in the build process). Any help will be appreciated. Gus From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 26 13:03:31 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A549106564A for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 13:03:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0BED8FC15 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 13:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id OAA04540; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 14:44:16 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1RUHc8-000H9o-DG; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 14:44:16 +0200 Message-ID: <4ED0DF1F.6090901@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 14:44:15 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111108 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gustau_P=E9rez?= References: <4ECF7440.4070300@entel.upc.edu> <4ECF8F05.8000007@protected-networks.net> <4ED0C40D.5010307@entel.upc.edu> <4ED0D963.1030702@entel.upc.edu> In-Reply-To: <4ED0D963.1030702@entel.upc.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD current , freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464} X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 13:03:31 -0000 on 26/11/2011 14:19 Gustau Pérez said the following: > > Starting Virtualbox in the console in headless mode allows to see what happens > and get a dump of the panic. > > The messages I got were not the cause problem. The panic I was able to get > shows this: > > http://pastebin.com/dHnB3Xh0 > > I can't get any further with core although I compiled virtualbox-ose-kmod with > debug symbols (I used make config to enable them, because I think -DWITH_DEBUG > does not work because kmk is used in the build process). > > Any help will be appreciated. vm_phys_alloc_contig implementation has been recently changed and now it seems to require that vm_page_queue_free_mtx is held. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 26 16:57:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D594E10656B9; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 16:57:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gleb.kurtsou@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD158FC15; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 16:57:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by faap15 with SMTP id p15so5489509faa.13 for ; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:57:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=awZBLPOdbqtffGRXaipPY3Y4+JUyfFfFbtomMIRCAs0=; b=eSdPFSFPFnwID/PUQ769cm0sQfBN7y9HhkF051/MatoQEBXuN1aS3/WrOW2FCMWj5y 9Dt8md/c3gp+oAWiDRc5NcuWyv8+xtfyyrA/79zFBMYOLZ9HtV6aHE6Y3Agd0MWoI2yi p+gbhn/d3DywEeOw5a85KyURUTOLTaw5rwWqU= Received: by 10.152.106.130 with SMTP id gu2mr23599748lab.37.1322325224678; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:33:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([78.157.92.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ni5sm26201118lab.3.2011.11.26.08.33.42 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:33:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 18:33:43 +0200 From: Gleb Kurtsou To: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: <20111126163343.GA9150@reks> References: <4ECF7440.4070300@entel.upc.edu> <4ECF8F05.8000007@protected-networks.net> <4ED0C40D.5010307@entel.upc.edu> <4ED0D963.1030702@entel.upc.edu> <4ED0DF1F.6090901@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4ED0DF1F.6090901@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD current , freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464} X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 16:57:40 -0000 On (26/11/2011 14:44), Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 26/11/2011 14:19 Gustau PĂ©rez said the following: > > > > Starting Virtualbox in the console in headless mode allows to see what happens > > and get a dump of the panic. > > > > The messages I got were not the cause problem. The panic I was able to get > > shows this: > > > > http://pastebin.com/dHnB3Xh0 > > > > I can't get any further with core although I compiled virtualbox-ose-kmod with > > debug symbols (I used make config to enable them, because I think -DWITH_DEBUG > > does not work because kmk is used in the build process). > > > > Any help will be appreciated. > > vm_phys_alloc_contig implementation has been recently changed and now it seems > to require that vm_page_queue_free_mtx is held. Using new vm_page_alloc_contig() may be a better option here. Can't help with patch, stuck with pre Nov 15 CURRENT myself. > > -- > Andriy Gapon > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"