From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 25 00:03:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3B6A39 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:03:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A938FC0C for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:03:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TcPgu-0000nM-88 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 01:03:20 +0100 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 01:03:20 +0100 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 25 Nov 2012 01:03:20 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: Another question about pkgng Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 18 Message-ID: References: <50B1422A.7070902@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Pan/0.135 (Tomorrow I'll Wake Up and Scald Myself with Tea; GIT 30dc37b master) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 00:03:14 -0000 On Sat, 24 Nov 2012 21:54:50 +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 24/11/2012 20:28, Walter Hurry wrote: >> When I issue 'pkg version -R' it does not actually use the remote >> repository for comparison; instead it uses the local cache of the >> remote repository, i.e. it checks local.sqlite against repo.sqlite. >> >> That's fine, but should it not do a 'pkg update' first? > > That would be consistent with the way 'pkg upgrade' and 'pkg install' > behave, so personally I think that would be a yes. > > Can you open an issue on Github so this point does not get forgotten > please? > > https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/issues > Thanks, Matthew. Done - Issue #396