From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Apr 3 06:19:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD33ADE595 for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 06:19:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DA7610FD for ; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 06:19:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id u336J29Q034569; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 16:19:02 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 16:19:02 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Odhiambo Washington cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW Firewall Rule In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20160403161442.Y39547@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 06:19:15 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 617, Issue 7, Message: 5 On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 21:05:52 +0300 Odhiambo Washington wrote: > Setup OpenVPN on your firewall and connect to it using self-signed certs. > Pretty easy! > MAC addresses will not work when you are roaming. > "Oh, the cruft." Thanks for adding huge amounts of succinctness :-) cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Apr 4 06:35:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4E21B02FF0 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 06:35:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mapsware@prodigy.net.mx) Received: from nlpiport18.prodigy.net.mx (nlpiport18.prodigy.net.mx [148.235.52.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 945AA1517 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 06:35:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mapsware@prodigy.net.mx) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,439,1454997600"; d="scan'208";a="1244162009" Received: from nlpiport19.prodigy.net.mx ([148.235.52.84]) by nlpiport18.prodigy.net.mx with ESMTP; 04 Apr 2016 01:30:05 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq4FAGoJAleU6zQD/2dsb2JhbABdrBsBAQEBAQEGlgeIAQEBAQEBAWYnhQICAXgTIYkIApsIoSyFWIodhQoFjkGJQI1+CokshWOPGmKEB4hWAQEB Received: from npispx03.prodigy.net.mx (HELO smtp.prodigy.net.mx) ([148.235.52.3]) by nlpiport19.prodigy.net.mx with ESMTP; 04 Apr 2016 01:30:04 -0500 Received: from morena.maps.net (dsl-189-173-64-177-dyn.prod-infinitum.com.mx [189.173.64.177]) by smtp.prodigy.net.mx (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.3-11.01 64bit (built Sep 1 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0O53008S8JE4QO40@smtp.prodigy.net.mx>; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 01:30:04 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 23:29:56 -0700 From: Martin Paredes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: bsdinstall no detecting existing EFI partition Message-id: <20160403232956.22ded633@morena.maps.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; i386-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 06:35:11 -0000 Hi: The laptop is UEFI and came with windows, so I free 60 GB of space ada0p1 500 MB efi ada0p2 16 MB ms-reserved ada0p3 59 GB ms-basic-data ada0p4 450 MB !de94bba4-06d1- 60 GB - free space - I installed FreeBSD 10.2 and I selected "Auto (UFS)" when partitioning and bsdinstall add this partitions ada0p5 800 KB efi ada0p6 57 GB freebsd-boot ada0p7 1.0 MB freebsd-swap Now gpart list 2 EFI partitions Where can I see the code that create the partiotions and populate the second efi partition If I select Manual or Shell (when partitioning) and don't create the second efi partition, does bsdinstall will see the first efi partition? What operations does bsdinstall make in the efi partition? -- Martin Paredes Hermosillo, Son. Mexico From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Apr 4 07:26:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF3AB026F2 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 07:26:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x22f.google.com (mail-lb0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1459B11CB for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 07:26:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lb0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id u8so146767024lbk.0 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 00:26:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=9x7e1VbGmZ1BTpy7l9IUR5Y3wPfPc9ExhkSMgD+21/k=; b=xVAW7b6w6SoEtioWFKW4asbZcUWDPUwWGj6CzmnR8JYBMHlxAJhMOuL8dppalPrabE tNq+6nRXxftuzxjCLqbbkE+BzQ+Wl7OkchyievPxYq2EiOjsC1f4AqYxC4XU5rZ9ZZ5j 2bSZQL+BgK/yGPDyYCSYuS8JkWm8ON1kH7Maz9eP7P/3xz1bTB9/YYbduJ8WMmByURbV +UMqmHfFZ+UvVTQDmv3xddbb9d3b3NHJcqzg5+xetIbU4Oq4N7M56j5zNHIiHO8morOH 3uD1qlwdpK0qlJWCuZS1nWtu9MBPxcuR/aF7eX/6YycCFJVJ7/f7iMK1W33CFUzLNKxn 4Ipw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=9x7e1VbGmZ1BTpy7l9IUR5Y3wPfPc9ExhkSMgD+21/k=; b=GaPrLtYdC7/YvCx9iWpEqDwHU6TRE916FnSAICUbrThf5ndKFDejIZYWdQQNcmCNqC NBUMu+JT9Ak0/IRbHQUxy2JvApfQD5erwT+kODMTrwcw1e7G18A7h4dA5SRO75uuO1Mq yxeMGd/fXWzKTF0I5+nWIILPYDWoY5PzBHGxfIkCnICieAxx2c+pqw5W9j+cQvzycYnA 8swN/Y95SxnzkUgopX2VLL+fVT/fxOYiobMrFGL5UI4FiQIG+pyJtl3F5Brm+s4lVfOJ LhpoP0uAM78FS14uKnZO1VhjXWVCnKVsawbPG3KZyWTDiMIvtWtEIvA7w6zx5WSipTcW gMJA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIO87aRJaBrkwnaDtkS6d8ndbgDYh7/U4pxbi2jSZYJp5g16XWVPepnncbR/hfMAp6s7hkaWHR0nLtHxA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.132.212 with SMTP id g203mr10394874wmd.30.1459754779256; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 00:26:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.46.67 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 00:26:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160403232956.22ded633@morena.maps.net> References: <20160403232956.22ded633@morena.maps.net> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 08:26:19 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bsdinstall no detecting existing EFI partition From: krad To: Martin Paredes Cc: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 07:26:21 -0000 you dont need 2x efi partitions just put the freebsd bootx64.efi in a different directory on the efi so you get something like this efi/boot/bootx64.efi (windows one) efi/freebsd/bootx64.efi you should be able to choose which os from the UEFI (BIOS to some) boot menu, usually invoked by F10 during boot On 4 April 2016 at 07:29, Martin Paredes wrote: > Hi: > > The laptop is UEFI and came with windows, so I free 60 GB of space > > ada0p1 500 MB efi > ada0p2 16 MB ms-reserved > ada0p3 59 GB ms-basic-data > ada0p4 450 MB !de94bba4-06d1- > 60 GB - free space - > > I installed FreeBSD 10.2 and I selected "Auto (UFS)" when partitioning > and bsdinstall add this partitions > > ada0p5 800 KB efi > ada0p6 57 GB freebsd-boot > ada0p7 1.0 MB freebsd-swap > > Now gpart list 2 EFI partitions > > Where can I see the code that create the partiotions and populate the > second efi partition > > If I select Manual or Shell (when partitioning) and don't create the > second efi partition, does bsdinstall will see the first efi partition? > > What operations does bsdinstall make in the efi partition? > > -- > Martin Paredes > Hermosillo, Son. Mexico > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Apr 4 11:04:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F3E3B027EC for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:04:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com (mail-lf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 985261354 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:04:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: by mail-lf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id c62so164493534lfc.1 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 04:04:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bris-ac-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=DVfIQh3+laU97J0Sov5oJDcARcc7rjMEjSMDX0muY1M=; b=BeQ/elWpmpMjL4dWij/MWBEBdHiXjzQvCgrNFVSxFf8moMc9F8PhKtsXacJ5phvMFu GECzcKu2iM/N9Fz4rQx9ydkvf5BC5mCNLbD9FIYTgpeeItDSSH7Qm7BluWhlnNZepjuF owDNLIFp1fyGbtWFeBU7G+DM3CG5HkWRoNmcSnqf0t9B9BAiY5CBqSdjuODAfasgiU6q TxifxXoqbk9T1wWVWwc+w+pm0unzvCIvyhdwYJKdYoDcVZVGXV5ZeK1XNIrwk9ffs53a 37i8brTAfnAPJLZzXDYLbF+Ym4wapvbm9cbIyaVS3CS9iOMpNsF4uGw65hOZgi+t4lam UR7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:reply-to; bh=DVfIQh3+laU97J0Sov5oJDcARcc7rjMEjSMDX0muY1M=; b=fD628U0aJ9Rd5E1hL5CEMPifSM9k4Inzfj9jcgAuOqy5AF4vuPWUzd9utvzx0z5tSM yXDCA2JNK8bSZl+geXocROTpM/AeKlJq2OikjAndg+QhW1SPuP40EzNUWKZpCmcvodVH DIeJjSqIqn+iIO1zCaz7CX2jXHWMaM5OIMXh7z4dGw9090lpGZGWAjyT+J6su+pZxJhQ YfLSDHVHqQJauWNpK5QqyHBcpSZ5WqxgBECyMpQn4PnnrF3W2/PBVCULDt1NcUyCzGrE tOVSvi+/GjC01CI1O5GQih08iOOujHoMS6sh5nNVVfM/j1I3WcAxjXgEEh8TEchQ6IZu VAyg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLz8HhGGPkNzhLM8du6Vez7H5jzKduIRhcw1zHDDvJ0vSYRFtb5hu6lRzj8sY4HB6wX X-Received: by 10.194.189.38 with SMTP id gf6mr17413444wjc.72.1459767850731; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 04:04:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.170.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i5sm28416364wja.23.2016.04.04.04.04.09 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Apr 2016 04:04:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u34B49Vo051742; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 12:04:09 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u34B49Tw051741; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 12:04:09 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 12:04:09 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201604041104.u34B49Tw051741@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, java@freebsd.org Subject: when do I need to set JAVA_HOME? Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 11:04:13 -0000 I'm having troubles running an openGL 3D visualisation over ssh -Y: javax.media.opengl.GLException: Error making context current at com.sun.opengl.impl.x11.X11GLContext.makeCurrentImpl(X11GLContext.java:141) at com.sun.opengl.impl.x11.X11OnscreenGLContext.makeCurrentImpl(X11OnscreenGLContext.java:69) at com.sun.opengl.impl.GLContextImpl.makeCurrent(GLContextImpl.java:127) The X server is on FreeBSD 11-current. It was suggested to me to double check Java setup. I have installed $ pkg info -xo jdk linux-oracle-jdk18-8.77 java/linux-oracle-jdk18 openjdk8-8.77.3 java/openjdk8 Both ports rely on java/javavmwrapper, which installs symlinks under /usr/local/bin, all pointing to /usr/local/bin/javavm. So is it not recommended to invoke binaries from either of the above ports directly? Will these be invoked somehow via /usr/local/bin/javavm? The javavm(1) man page lists multiple env var, e.g. JAVA_HOME, JAVA_OS, none of which I have set. So I'm unsure: 1. If I have only a single JDK port installed, do I need to set any env vars or anything else up to be able to use Java? 2. If I have multiple JDK installed, as above, how do I choose which one is used? Thanks Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Apr 4 15:39:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04A0B01367 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:39:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Received: from smtp.krpservers.com (smtp.krpservers.com [62.13.128.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.krpservers.com", Issuer "RapidSSL SHA256 CA - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 792DD1597 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:39:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Received: from [10.12.30.106] (vpn01-01.tdx.co.uk [62.13.130.213] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.krpservers.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u34Fbl4l097662 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 16:37:48 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 16:37:47 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: 'unbound-control-setup' Deleted in 10.3 - replacement? Message-ID: <05F9CB3D9DD34B668FE05B81@[10.12.30.106]> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 15:39:36 -0000 Hi, Having just gone to setup unbound on a new box - it appears 'unbound-control-setup' is deleted - remember seeing something in the release notes, so checked the release notes again: Yes, it's gone: The unbound-control-setup script has been removed from the base system. [r295690] According to r295690 it was broken. Any ideas what was broken? - Did it not work, did it generate an insecure PEM or something? - i.e. What do you do to replace it's functionality? The man page for unbound still references it - and 'man -k unbound-control-setup' still lists it. I can't really find anything to tell me how to generate a PEM for the unbound-control system - everything I've found just says "run unbound-control-setup" :( -Kp From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Apr 4 19:47:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC500B023EF for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 19:47:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78091BE7 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 19:47:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from yuri.doctorlan.com (c-73-71-174-75.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.71.174.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id u34Jc38P083205 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 12:38:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-73-71-174-75.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.71.174.75] claimed to be yuri.doctorlan.com To: FreeBSD Questions From: Yuri Subject: Failure to read a Bluray disk with 'dvdbackup' command Message-ID: <5702C29A.5050208@rawbw.com> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 12:38:02 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 19:47:46 -0000 My attempts to backup a Bluray disk with this command fail: # dvdbackup -M libdvdread:DVDOpenFileUDF:UDFFindFile /VIDEO_TS/VIDEO_TS.IFO failed libdvdread:DVDOpenFileUDF:UDFFindFile /VIDEO_TS/VIDEO_TS.BUP failed libdvdread: Can't open file VIDEO_TS.BUP. Cannot open Video Manager (VMG) info. Mirror of DVD failed System log gets this message repeated many times logged during dvdbackup command: Apr 4 12:32:48 yuri kernel: (cd0:ata2:0:1:0): READ DVD STRUCTURE. CDB: ad 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 08 00 00 Apr 4 12:32:48 yuri kernel: (cd0:ata2:0:1:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error Apr 4 12:32:48 yuri kernel: (cd0:ata2:0:1:0): SCSI status: Check Condition Apr 4 12:32:48 yuri kernel: (cd0:ata2:0:1:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:30,2 (Cannot read medium - incompatible format) Apr 4 12:32:48 yuri kernel: (cd0:ata2:0:1:0): Retrying command (per sense data) The device is recognized as: Apr 4 12:06:50 yuri kernel: cd0 at ata2 bus 0 scbus0 target 1 lun 0 Apr 4 12:06:50 yuri kernel: cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI device Apr 4 12:06:50 yuri kernel: cd0: Serial Number K9LDC482430 Apr 4 12:06:50 yuri kernel: cd0: 33.300MB/s transfers (UDMA2, ATAPI 12bytes, PIO 8192bytes) Apr 4 12:06:50 yuri kernel: cd0: 22687MB (11616096 2048 byte sectors) Anybody can tell what might be wrong? 10.3-PRERELEASE dvdbackup-0.4.2_3 libdvdcss-1.3.99 Thank you, Yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Apr 4 20:16:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BED9CB02D69; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 20:16:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from till.oliver.knoll@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x244.google.com (mail-lb0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45E9018B4; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 20:16:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from till.oliver.knoll@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lb0-x244.google.com with SMTP id q4so24692694lbq.3; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:16:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=GtDVp7kqfjZm9UE2BvU5awMNSRdZ0CCll+qBYMTr/1A=; b=iQ3r5M7WtmomEs0QuXRLGCn3XNkLC6rIS8t80twGIkcTVlhVGztPnqJ5NSI7TF/So/ 1ESpNAT0krDRPb5xklA9Eg12wCl88Hd99lT/y86uUcsLLYld3iyG776MWu7YIVpJPv85 eG9PNCkQMZBrSaqxEzWgA5apwdisAk/GebxtskXgEcK33bNYo4FVGsVNllGo04vLfC/H 7Cqqlt7bfjcm6tUhXAal8Er/CBYsKaVML1MGWD8lX7/38GUlsyfgC87kYJQ0/6DGy2hR GFdQwd8HR/MkaqlQOyH993DLTCFRuuPyfvesdzZLBG9VBC3dz/r5uifzoyoD+yOwypCK 48/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=GtDVp7kqfjZm9UE2BvU5awMNSRdZ0CCll+qBYMTr/1A=; b=Mf36JEh1Z1soh3hj6/1FxSlg7jy2nWiCJDRoNh5SZLMYOIs0fiG6N6DfRwfBI2NaKd rQJrIhgwpN8VfKjdae4BhuN20is2QALpVt0Kmp1cE5WKgmXuPq6WpuGYaH83KE3a82el Ov7SRYXVsGuegE5+juJxtpiPqGGOX2EifSNBBVlN1gnVX9N0yYpCavShByIx2TVA+l+t Dz489m+wI+JJI8IzcyCJdT/2fOhXNhmCeKYGJ0E1KN13JQzpAHDQcfeyQcHXZgcfw2QX MYluJB5OdaBu/Cd/KfVi106D78YhRscqpsVDRLPOVt6y6iig8VVUlEnmlNDKxnXIJLak cHqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLZkP2pqlKXXLROP60KGc6kW1A7MFgKz8zBnmI2oypF8CPNpfq7tmwzM4fgg+89og== X-Received: by 10.28.217.146 with SMTP id q140mr13811444wmg.85.1459801000424; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:16:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.176.193.116] ([213.55.184.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id cf6sm9246116wjc.12.2016.04.04.13.16.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 04 Apr 2016 13:16:39 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: when do I need to set JAVA_HOME? From: Till Oliver Knoll X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13E238) In-Reply-To: <201604041104.u34B49Tw051741@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:16:38 +0200 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, java@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0B98F374-862C-4433-A774-56D266CA4CDB@gmail.com> References: <201604041104.u34B49Tw051741@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> To: mexas@bris.ac.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 20:16:42 -0000 > Am 04.04.2016 um 13:04 schrieb Anton Shterenlikht : >=20 > I'm having troubles running an openGL > 3D visualisation over ssh -Y: >=20 > javax.media.opengl.GLException: Error making context current > at com.sun.opengl.impl.x11.X11GLContext.makeCurrentImpl(X11GLContex= t.java:141) > at com.sun.opengl.impl.x11.X11OnscreenGLContext.makeCurrentImpl(X11= OnscreenGLContext.java:69) > at=20 Hello list, The exception above sais that "OpenGL cannot activate ("make current") the d= esired (requested) graphic context". That is usually the case when the GPU (= graphic card) does not provide the requested features such as bit depth or f= eatures such as double-buffering (actually that would fail already at OpenGL= context /creation/ time, but let's skip over the details here, shall ww ;))= . The point is to me it doesn't look like a class is missing, which would hint= at a missing CLASSPATH. It is really an error at runtime, after all classes= have been loaded. It could still be that some (non-mandatory) OpenGL driver is not found (in t= he JAVA CLASSPATH), but my suspicion goes towards SSH: we are talking about a= remote connection, right? Could well be that your remote X client (or was i= t the X Server? IIRC those X11 people have a weitd notion of "server" and "c= lient" - but never mind ;)), that is the display "where you eventually show t= he app", claims to have features (for the created GL context) which it doesn= 't (or the "X Server" on the remote display is simply buggy). All that said: does the application run locally (without SSH)? Do other Open= GL applications run over SSH (with a comparable feature set, that is, do the= y make use of the same OpenGL version features, e.g. "OpenGL 3.3" or even 4.= x)? Cheers, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Apr 4 21:50:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81ECAB025E3 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:50:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mapsware@prodigy.net.mx) Received: from nlpiport17.prodigy.net.mx (nlpiport17.prodigy.net.mx [148.235.52.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB4C152C for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 21:50:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mapsware@prodigy.net.mx) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,559,1449554400"; d="scan'208";a="1228694464" Received: from nlpiport23.prodigy.net.mx ([148.235.52.97]) by nlpiport17.prodigy.net.mx with ESMTP; 04 Apr 2016 16:45:31 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtUEAO7fAleU6zQC/2dsb2JhbABdhQenGQaIMo1Vhg0CgggBAQEBAQFmJ4RCAQEDATwBTAshExIPEjYZiBIDCggCuW0NhQIBAQgCAR2FWIUSgkGCSoUKBY5BiQ8xjBOBawqJLIVjh0SHVmKEB0yIJgEBAQ Received: from npispx02.prodigy.net.mx (HELO smtp.prodigy.net.mx) ([148.235.52.2]) by nlpiport23.prodigy.net.mx with ESMTP; 04 Apr 2016 16:45:31 -0500 Received: from morena.maps.net (dsl-189-173-64-177-dyn.prod-infinitum.com.mx [189.173.64.177]) by smtp.prodigy.net.mx (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7.3-11.01 64bit (built Sep 1 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0O5400IEJPRV5G70@smtp.prodigy.net.mx>; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 16:45:31 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:45:23 -0700 From: Martin Paredes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsdinstall no detecting existing EFI partition Message-id: <20160404144523.14fd7bec@morena.maps.net> In-reply-to: References: <20160403232956.22ded633@morena.maps.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.22; i386-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 21:50:39 -0000 El Mon, 04 Apr 2016 08:26:19 +0100 krad escribi=F3: > you dont need 2x efi partitions just put the freebsd bootx64.efi in a > different directory on the efi so you get something like this >=20 > efi/boot/bootx64.efi (windows one) > efi/freebsd/bootx64.efi >=20 > you should be able to choose which os from the UEFI (BIOS to some) > boot menu, usually invoked by F10 during boot The option appear, even if I left only 1 EFI partition without the bootx64.efi, something that the UEFI from the laptop does by it self >=20 > On 4 April 2016 at 07:29, Martin Paredes > > > > Where can I see the code that create the partiotions and populate > > the second efi partition > > I found some programs in /usr/libexec/bsdinstall/ But autopart is a binary file /usr/libexec/bsdinstall/autopart: ELF 32-bit LSB executable --=20 Martin Paredes Hermosillo, Son. Mexico From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Apr 5 00:42:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD23FB01654 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:42:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryce@bryce.net) Received: from mail-oi0-x22e.google.com (mail-oi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C4011047 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 00:42:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bryce@bryce.net) Received: by mail-oi0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id w85so58605685oiw.0 for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 17:42:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bryce-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date:to :mime-version; bh=VYO/3c70UYXZiIo4wZHF1T+rzxl5/dNYufkWXQlCHsE=; b=eUXABFvd0MsmArRvrylJxRpNqaaG/uQUuemHBfdW9exM1Osij1vRCUM0jNicw3QEw1 FTszmmfhBBQAx1V3HNXL71QuJ91cxXl/NLRBYWFddGZVz495J+3E9Tnd5JDLV7oVCMWv vmdg+Fqit44C14bntKAiDrnxHS5R7EX382lAUxVwaW2T/OXTTAGxsDJBmJeEOMJN26DK j4MNkBUsgnfJMUps8z0TXcTxLBCdn+Lf04OwoRczzRom7TglBC1PwWEmsbScMreGgTE0 JmXIPrLgJfIc8kL1xnTwEKYt9PrnXJir4R/Hb14W0H84nTyCRr4Vt85L7yGIdNCxS10g iXzA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:subject :message-id:date:to:mime-version; bh=VYO/3c70UYXZiIo4wZHF1T+rzxl5/dNYufkWXQlCHsE=; b=hslBRpT9pUqlfkNKYrN3fUkH6BVpJeowaaA8+UESANoW8TIlXwOesxeTDYaQhpV8cN /QqCP6N8AehQ96ZNXjCT/Go4m3VJIXwcWvFT/p0Gyz8ey2dorZ1kkVLsL0PiIKqDwSBq jQ0vQdMrumYVFsvV61fPDoqkkh+bt4QbrJj3/ebo9ayFIuIOshNoNmB8N97FqB1WHQWy aF2/3SsawbN6vheiB6khfgtWvixZXDTE7SRWVDsf+d9Z3XdEnDg6SHnQyeeS/yxg4dPR FyQnnJ9CTH40qEfYj6smHkpU1aMy09MCM8DPgUjr2VetcvfKqUVj26u/zGi5DpR9p0nA JRCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJL9STgjLlZBz+xLHtrPe9QTCP2PnPEZzKCv9OS74x7kpCBRkcFARLTpCsrcUavr/g== X-Received: by 10.157.27.180 with SMTP id z49mr7604986otd.61.1459816940785; Mon, 04 Apr 2016 17:42:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bryce-imac.attlocal.net (107-139-63-217.lightspeed.rcsntx.sbcglobal.net. [107.139.63.217]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k4sm9164210obx.13.2016.04.04.17.42.19 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Apr 2016 17:42:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Bryce Edwards Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: issue: freebsd-update -r 10.3-RELEASE upgrade Message-Id: <9D7C76AC-6E98-4F48-B8A7-C8BF74AA2314@bryce.net> Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 19:42:19 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 00:42:21 -0000 I=E2=80=99m getting asked to delete critical files in /boot and /etc = when I attempt to performa a freebsd-update upgrade! After seeing that = things were amiss, I exited=E2=80=A6. To troubleshoot, I first made sure my /usr/src was updated to = 10.3-RELEASE and then made sure mergemaster was happy camper with no = files needing updating. I also cleared out /var/db/freebsd-update after = having issues to make sure I was dealing with a clean slate. Here=E2=80=99s the output for reference: bryce@tahiti ~ $freebsd-version=20 10.2-RELEASE-p14 bryce@tahiti ~ $s freebsd-update -r 10.3-RELEASE upgrade Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. Fetching public key from update.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching metadata signature for 10.2-RELEASE from update.FreeBSD.org... = done. Fetching metadata index... done. Fetching 2 metadata files... done. Inspecting system... done. The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: kernel/generic src/src world/base The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: world/doc world/games world/lib32 Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y Fetching metadata signature for 10.3-RELEASE from update.FreeBSD.org... = done. Fetching metadata index... done. Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. Applying metadata patches... done. Fetching 1 metadata files... done. Inspecting system... done. Fetching files from 10.2-RELEASE for merging... done. Preparing to download files... done. Fetching 10331 = patches.....10....20....30....40....50....60....70....80....90....100....1= 10....120....130....140....150....160....170....180....190....200....210..= ..220....230....240....250....260....270....280....290....300....310....32= 0....330=E2=80=A6. [trimmed excess lines] ....10310....10320....10330 done. Applying patches... done. Fetching 74 files... done. /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or = directory Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE: /boot/device.hints Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE: /etc/amd.map Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE: /etc/apmd.conf Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE: /etc/auto_master Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE: /etc/autofs/include_ldap Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE: /etc/autofs/special_hosts Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE: /etc/autofs/special_media Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE: /etc/autofs/special_noauto Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE: /etc/autofs/special_null Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE: /etc/bluetooth/hcsecd.conf Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE: /etc/bluetooth/hosts Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE: /etc/bluetooth/protocols Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE: /etc/csh.cshrc Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE: /etc/csh.login Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE: /etc/csh.logout Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE: /etc/ddb.conf Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE: /etc/defaults/bluetooth.device.conf Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE: /etc/defaults/devfs.rules Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE: /etc/defaults/periodic.conf Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Apr 5 04:39:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D416CB033C3 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 04:39:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4CE51627 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 04:39:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u354dfjM033428 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:39:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u354dfuj033425; Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:39:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 22:39:41 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Martin Paredes cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsdinstall no detecting existing EFI partition In-Reply-To: <20160404144523.14fd7bec@morena.maps.net> Message-ID: References: <20160403232956.22ded633@morena.maps.net> <20160404144523.14fd7bec@morena.maps.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 04 Apr 2016 22:39:41 -0600 (MDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 04:39:42 -0000 On Mon, 4 Apr 2016, Martin Paredes wrote: > El Mon, 04 Apr 2016 08:26:19 +0100 > krad escribió: >> you dont need 2x efi partitions just put the freebsd bootx64.efi in a >> different directory on the efi so you get something like this >> >> efi/boot/bootx64.efi (windows one) >> efi/freebsd/bootx64.efi >> >> you should be able to choose which os from the UEFI (BIOS to some) >> boot menu, usually invoked by F10 during boot > > The option appear, even if I left only 1 EFI partition without the > bootx64.efi, something that the UEFI from the laptop does by it self > >> >> On 4 April 2016 at 07:29, Martin Paredes >>> >>> Where can I see the code that create the partiotions and populate >>> the second efi partition >>> > > I found some programs in > > /usr/libexec/bsdinstall/ > > But autopart is a binary file > > /usr/libexec/bsdinstall/autopart: ELF 32-bit LSB executable The FreeBSD EFI loader is /boot/boot1.efi The EFI partition can be mounted as msdosfs. Details are shown here: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html#_booting_with_uefi From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Apr 5 09:06:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B85B03D28 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 09:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AEF01159 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 09:06:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id 20so12438759wmh.1 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 02:06:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=EsZwZobL+bNFUsezVBbFfxN0Tb6iVcIlGO4O7zNyhOg=; b=yNgGjyi3JvKXNey3OIRnZJ8tiMByNrz6kxmQMRAdDKDdYN+Qbn7FHoenbYnl+0c1KC Sb4USYJO86H9uuokHjcAtZtpzuVVsNrbb4LUiS4aNMf9nzaqPo9UGuq7TMhNd5yAuon5 RE/Ezg0iJh2T1lOpMYNpMYtNE6XgGEO/iNAxODH77Z3UWHmsc3oniNc+KUrWZqQv3iFF 0aNQKaQ9vH9/EDhsAVJsdj2EmonCXLlbijRXEwp6aOY1etuILAYuj+qRzCJQGmejOYtS eIHukj0BEBR4JSl6FxE085+kJkXJZAxE8O7vtnO+3RfzAG/3EzzdIQeogF2lCV8H+Kgk 7UWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=EsZwZobL+bNFUsezVBbFfxN0Tb6iVcIlGO4O7zNyhOg=; b=kwZS08V5acHrbh7WHHBYZsT7Mm8b16eoKUaHdMfbKzQLc763/+R7oApBb/IVhl9b+7 V5wPBfeqvFRIymOaSf+n4w93Md8jHfrpvynXPYGrgWoQMmgRk3K3Eq/Mvq5YMUaQ07+n 7EEYfViEWBp6AxHUlhKKI3vOWTgrJDkDxqXdhTPJQPNVuoqGCn8lDKDVjdbaZVY/WZgF 19SAEkgZlXpp83rIXZ2cBLCmgI/EAbJ8wRqXIdhiGA9I/yCfIvGltcgbTBwHYhLHazsK 07hi6+MYEflYTAqWi6bNClJyAuxe7GkRSzt8s6hMqgtnvCN/iyfSf2O8wiE1OPi+g14v U5VQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLJb/cd+MIoKUFKsC6mqgEHCa+AxHM00sC30FiD61FxC3DNMbZ3zeBslkXw3FjlIAvTG/9Knqte3gj/aA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.91.83 with SMTP id p80mr17056342wmb.48.1459847178742; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 02:06:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.46.67 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 02:06:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20160403232956.22ded633@morena.maps.net> <20160404144523.14fd7bec@morena.maps.net> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 10:06:18 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bsdinstall no detecting existing EFI partition From: krad To: Warren Block Cc: Martin Paredes , FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 09:06:20 -0000 this is the layout of my working efi system # df -h . Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ada0p2 767K 130K 637K 17% /boot/efi # mount | grep /dev/ada0p2 /dev/ada0p2 on /boot/efi (msdosfs, local) # find . . ./efi ./efi/boot ./efi/boot/bootx64.efi # gpart show ada0 =3D> 34 117231341 ada0 GPT (56G) 34 1024 1 freebsd-boot (512K) 1058 6 - free - (3.0K) 1064 262144 2 efi (128M) 263208 3932154 4 freebsd-swap (1.9G) 4195362 113036013 3 freebsd-zfs (54G) the boot dir is the default efi boot but i can have other options by having other directories with different bootx64.efi files in IIRC On 5 April 2016 at 05:39, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 4 Apr 2016, Martin Paredes wrote: > > El Mon, 04 Apr 2016 08:26:19 +0100 >> krad escribi=C3=B3: >> >>> you dont need 2x efi partitions just put the freebsd bootx64.efi in a >>> different directory on the efi so you get something like this >>> >>> efi/boot/bootx64.efi (windows one) >>> efi/freebsd/bootx64.efi >>> >>> you should be able to choose which os from the UEFI (BIOS to some) >>> boot menu, usually invoked by F10 during boot >>> >> >> The option appear, even if I left only 1 EFI partition without the >> bootx64.efi, something that the UEFI from the laptop does by it self >> >> >>> On 4 April 2016 at 07:29, Martin Paredes >>> >>>> >>>> Where can I see the code that create the partiotions and populate >>>> the second efi partition >>>> >>>> >> I found some programs in >> >> /usr/libexec/bsdinstall/ >> >> But autopart is a binary file >> >> /usr/libexec/bsdinstall/autopart: ELF 32-bit LSB executable >> > > The FreeBSD EFI loader is > /boot/boot1.efi > > The EFI partition can be mounted as msdosfs. Details are shown here: > http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html#_booting_with_uef= i > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Apr 5 10:47:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B61B017CB for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 10:47:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bblister@gmail.com) Received: from mbob.nabble.com (mbob.nabble.com [162.253.133.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FD919A3 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 10:47:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bblister@gmail.com) Received: from msam.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.85]) by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40242484116 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 03:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 03:47:40 -0700 (MST) From: BBlister To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1459853260874-6089694.post@n5.nabble.com> Subject: invalid chunk added : please help me fix it MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 10:47:48 -0000 Hi, I tried to upgrade my ports using portmaster, and I receive multiple messages of: pkg-static: Invalid configuration file: invalid chunk added The messages of this type are hundreds, as you may see in this picture: http://snag.gy/Q322m.jpg The ports seem to be upgraded OK, but I do not like this output stream of warning messages. I searched the google but no relevant links were discovered....because I do not think that I am the first person who has this message, can you guide me towards the solution? Thank you in advance, BB -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/invalid-chunk-added-please-help-me-fix-it-tp6089694.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Apr 5 11:14:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3744FB03289 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:14:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD5ED1611 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:14:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 223009AE5 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:14:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/223009AE5; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: invalid chunk added : please help me fix it To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1459853260874-6089694.post@n5.nabble.com> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <57039DFE.7010309@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 12:14:06 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1459853260874-6089694.post@n5.nabble.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9K1PeliLQdo3pGmBGDdJX6JeUXiTaNJhL" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.1 at smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 11:14:27 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --9K1PeliLQdo3pGmBGDdJX6JeUXiTaNJhL Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="teuVk7sKdJf6hlgbRSeAsOh7fGwBwHST6" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <57039DFE.7010309@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: invalid chunk added : please help me fix it References: <1459853260874-6089694.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1459853260874-6089694.post@n5.nabble.com> --teuVk7sKdJf6hlgbRSeAsOh7fGwBwHST6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/04/2016 11:47, BBlister wrote: > I tried to upgrade my ports using portmaster, and I receive multiple > messages of: >=20 > pkg-static: Invalid configuration file: invalid chunk added >=20 This indicates an error generated by the UCL parser while pkg is reading its own configuration file, or possibly one of the repo configs in /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/*.conf. Chances are this is a simple typo somewhere. It would be helpful here if pkg(8) showed the file name and line number where the problem was found, but it doesn't. > The messages of this type are hundreds, as you may see in this picture:= >=20 > http://snag.gy/Q322m.jpg Yeah -- that's portmaster calling pkg(8) over and over again. You'll likely get that message every time pkg(8) is invoked. > The ports seem to be upgraded OK, but I do not like this output stream = of > warning messages. >=20 > I searched the google but no relevant links were discovered....because = I do > not think that I am the first person who has this message, can you guid= e me > towards the solution? Please show us your /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf, any repo.conf files you may have and the output of 'pkg -vv' Cheers, Matthew --teuVk7sKdJf6hlgbRSeAsOh7fGwBwHST6-- --9K1PeliLQdo3pGmBGDdJX6JeUXiTaNJhL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXA54GXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATLAoQAK06j5nlsh5oHOa/9nZdLYKi pEsIcsY/VEFtl8PdiFDhJk36Wkg1nr0xPRjeTshGWDtOsgQAZCekkHyPbri93ET4 GVbRo78SBsEpEBTZ2iTnbSTV98Jwk8fBF38wP5ezZgYJJQdvXXz4/KTFRDgaNOgY q85IRoUfstWqoE7hwot3EeP/6rVhCVjJKoSsAPCF8UjaoyAADUqzEIQ6ZHAri/WQ TQ4oNEhFREIpo5LJeksBniiSoV/EExkCCCS8j/0WZC4LrAUxSR23U1dGUbPGZrbr xRIBLF2fbm2zM4vBr4tz8faAbUzyCrNadNb5xpKzm5owXZetnlyQ2JZDJDGGZiWH Qrv/W018QUyrEy2PNWY8becwpfC7X0xPi1t80/5eHJe67IYoQ+iL9H/vWYSxh22L XK1n5+V1d1D0rCMIaHToMAUDWQgJmgvrVa5ggEWPvQb/hJWu5XRuZdW//D5leBLg ypZQWDhcMY7HCHjkQFglpIfBMJGGOhs4H/6RArjT2pV4vTgSPUhnbWUHekLqw5if phZeb+c05mAz18/qCiQjW6PzhmG0iBl0sZAUujn47YXjiDLLQMRXRG+JumUt/FtO Gysc/N6+esjXkdYKaPjmWs0fti3ZFThZemtYPWtFKWoITGNv4MmKoUrMCz9go1pf CueIEQZc6hXulch10XEn =LLWs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9K1PeliLQdo3pGmBGDdJX6JeUXiTaNJhL-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Apr 5 12:57:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578D2B0318F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 12:57:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Received: from outbound.ifdnrg.com (outbound.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1109811E5 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 12:57:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Received: from [192.168.0.99] (cpc14-sgyl28-2-0-cust626.18-2.cable.virginm.net [82.39.86.115]) (authenticated bits=0) by outbound.ifdnrg.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id u35CVYEg013131 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:31:37 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) X-Authentication-Warning: outbound.ifdnrg.com: Host cpc14-sgyl28-2-0-cust626.18-2.cable.virginm.net [82.39.86.115] claimed to be [192.168.0.99] Subject: Re: invalid chunk added : please help me fix it To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1459853260874-6089694.post@n5.nabble.com> From: Paul Macdonald Message-ID: <5703B022.1050807@ifdnrg.com> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:31:30 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1459853260874-6089694.post@n5.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 12:57:02 -0000 On 05/04/2016 11:47, BBlister wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to upgrade my ports using portmaster, and I receive multiple > messages of: > > pkg-static: Invalid configuration file: invalid chunk added > I'm also getting this on many boxes as of late: /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf is only repo file FreeBSD: { url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/latest", mirror_type: "srv", enabled: yes } Output of pkg vv #pkg -vv pkg: Invalid configuration file: invalid chunk added Version : 1.7.1 PKG_DBDIR = "/var/db/pkg"; PKG_CACHEDIR = "/var/cache/pkg"; PORTSDIR = "/usr/ports"; INDEXDIR = ""; INDEXFILE = "INDEX-10"; HANDLE_RC_SCRIPTS = false; DEFAULT_ALWAYS_YES = false; ASSUME_ALWAYS_YES = false; REPOS_DIR [ "/etc/pkg/", "/usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/", ] PLIST_KEYWORDS_DIR = ""; SYSLOG = true; ABI = "FreeBSD:10:amd64"; ALTABI = "freebsd:10:x86:64"; DEVELOPER_MODE = false; VULNXML_SITE = "http://vuxml.freebsd.org/freebsd/vuln.xml.bz2"; FETCH_RETRY = 3; PKG_PLUGINS_DIR = "/usr/local/lib/pkg/"; PKG_ENABLE_PLUGINS = true; PLUGINS [ ] DEBUG_SCRIPTS = false; PLUGINS_CONF_DIR = "/usr/local/etc/pkg/"; PERMISSIVE = false; REPO_AUTOUPDATE = true; NAMESERVER = ""; HTTP_USER_AGENT = "pkg/1.7.1"; EVENT_PIPE = ""; FETCH_TIMEOUT = 30; UNSET_TIMESTAMP = false; SSH_RESTRICT_DIR = ""; PKG_ENV { } PKG_SSH_ARGS = ""; DEBUG_LEVEL = 0; ALIAS { } CUDF_SOLVER = ""; SAT_SOLVER = ""; RUN_SCRIPTS = true; CASE_SENSITIVE_MATCH = false; LOCK_WAIT = 1; LOCK_RETRIES = 5; SQLITE_PROFILE = false; WORKERS_COUNT = 0; READ_LOCK = false; PLIST_ACCEPT_DIRECTORIES = false; IP_VERSION = 0; AUTOMERGE = true; VERSION_SOURCE = ""; CONSERVATIVE_UPGRADE = true; PKG_CREATE_VERBOSE = false; AUTOCLEAN = false; DOT_FILE = ""; REPOSITORIES { } VALID_URL_SCHEME [ "pkg+http", "pkg+https", "https", "http", "file", "ssh", "ftp", "ftps", "pkg+ssh", "pkg+ftp", "pkg+ftps", ] ALLOW_BASE_SHLIBS = false; WARN_SIZE_LIMIT = 1048576; Repositories: FreeBSD: { url : "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:10:amd64/latest", enabled : yes, priority : 0, mirror_type : "SRV", signature_type : "FINGERPRINTS", fingerprints : "/usr/share/keys/pkg" } -- ------------------------- Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd Web and video hosting ------------------------- t: 0131 5548070 m: 07970339546 e: paul@ifdnrg.com w: http://www.ifdnrg.com ------------------------- IFDNRG 40 Maritime Street Edinburgh EH6 6SA ---------------------------------------------------- High Specification Dedicated Servers from £100.00pm ---------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Apr 5 13:16:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5DFB0399B for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:16:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from moiseev@mezonplus.ru) Received: from mx.mezonplus.ru (mx.mezonplus.ru [91.211.181.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8EAC1B39 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 13:16:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from moiseev@mezonplus.ru) Received: from [192.168.0.102] (nb-latitude.users.mezon.local [192.168.0.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.mezonplus.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B31663EA7 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:09:17 +0300 (MSK) Subject: Re: FreeBSD ZFS snapshots and "previous versions" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Alexander Moisseev Message-ID: <164c1dc9-3474-8560-6e7d-a69fc184f2b6@mezonplus.ru> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:09:17 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:48.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/48.0a1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 13:16:12 -0000 On 30.03.2016 12:31, Gabor Radnai wrote: > Hi, > > If I understand correctly OP wants to use Windows feature called 'Previous > Version' off from BSD filer. > This can be done on FreeBSD + Samba4 adding followings to smb4.conf: > > vfs objects = shadow_copy2 > shadow:format = %Y-%m-%d_%H.%M.%S--1h > shadow:sort = desc > shadow:mountpoint = > shadow:snapdir = .zfs/snapshot > shadow:localtime = yes > > format is customizable and zfs snapshot should be aligned accordingly > obviously. > > Hope it helps. > _______________________________________________ FYI It's broken in Samba 4.1 and newer: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11658 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Apr 5 14:56:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30427B04A2F for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:56:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B12271331 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from zero-gravitas.local (vpn-1.adestra.com [46.236.37.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3C659BAD for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 14:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/A3C659BAD; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: invalid chunk added : please help me fix it To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1459853260874-6089694.post@n5.nabble.com> <5703B022.1050807@ifdnrg.com> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <5703D22F.5060807@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 15:56:47 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5703B022.1050807@ifdnrg.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1pEvpkCogn3dFBkAbfDOnoeDrWr0pAS9i" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.1 at smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 14:56:54 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --1pEvpkCogn3dFBkAbfDOnoeDrWr0pAS9i Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bc2CJX9uiedsHsOjgJLnd5DjSEmM0JLO5" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <5703D22F.5060807@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: invalid chunk added : please help me fix it References: <1459853260874-6089694.post@n5.nabble.com> <5703B022.1050807@ifdnrg.com> In-Reply-To: <5703B022.1050807@ifdnrg.com> --bc2CJX9uiedsHsOjgJLnd5DjSEmM0JLO5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016/04/05 13:31, Paul Macdonald wrote: > I'm also getting this on many boxes as of late: Hmmm... curious. > /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf is only repo file >=20 > FreeBSD: { > url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/latest", > mirror_type: "srv", > enabled: yes > } This is just to override the default FreeBSD.conf and use the latest packages rather than the quarterly ones? You actually only need the url: line in that case, since everything else is the same as the default FreeBSD.conf -- not that this is at all germane to the problem at hand. That repo.conf is fine as it is. Do you have a /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf at all? Can you try moving it out of the way temporarily and see if that suppresses the error message? pkg(8) should run just fine without a pkg.conf at all. I know there were bug fixes related to UCL parsing in the latest release, and I'm wandering if that has somehow triggered a problem with what was once considered a valid config file. Cheers, Matthew --bc2CJX9uiedsHsOjgJLnd5DjSEmM0JLO5-- --1pEvpkCogn3dFBkAbfDOnoeDrWr0pAS9i Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXA9I2XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnCLEP/1vYef02OoABpyYzy+An51J+ qdsn0CXm2YrxF3vVBeV9h+N2mWlB+eTgXoDpRPcrX4nEgBK3limsIl3ZZHQjOflT DQ1FUY6HMRDj72K/+dPkltzoGSvRmIcgLd+hiFsR4HCGNaeFu6S252QVged08l04 zzwqd0NjNWWoCWwnWKo+A4vhuM2T93w9HwHMLpTiRhmfROzRBU23zXqnBQnTGxjl dlplIQHZQYGQpVQ2ZnhtArBv/BpZG2VWe/R6u2JXTapJkOai13CIM1Dpxmv2iUxK QSaqI6YNaCcDYDJwHvUYyJEOR1sfKX1qm4deAZLhXyY+ybzCOF4tE+gW0ZYkBD7e qBV5Q/tK5bVKVV8UJuHrLln6EVrufQAse5ZjT7AKt91+t5DdGGx41Ko2TIc2GjP6 fNaxgQ2Z8Or3PDwB2gRMv231ZkRT6+6Nn5/m29GgLGQz/cw8kUPS0W8zGfIrW0nt L3hU/QqhNLwDyFN95HBaa/GOJIQzAoE3Qn+0JJCqy/RiiplzMgmEu72uPRH4oQ/M Nrg2MQFtdhA4jzVoIBpYm4HJ1XNuiB5UyXCuV7F0v2L44ArT7k+temyc3J/S4sUv ad9Kmw/2krz3U8LsIZEkSxkc8qYJX9OMp/XstkM9Z3rxcDgQk1+mLZm8plA+u5ZT XO32jbw9PNiote2KguV5 =2Gno -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1pEvpkCogn3dFBkAbfDOnoeDrWr0pAS9i-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Apr 5 15:02:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979E0B04CDE for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 15:02:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adam03@getmarketing123.com) Received: from mail1102.opentransfer.com (mail1102.opentransfer.com [98.130.1.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6AE187A for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 15:02:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adam03@getmarketing123.com) Comment: DKIM? See http://www.dkim.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=getmarketing123.com; s=dkim-shared; x=1460473355; h=Comment: DomainKey-Signature:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date: Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Thread-Index: Content-Language; bh=iq7hofas3mgmDVGcSjvVvsdf2WLgKf0pqZu8hI1NnkU =; b=ZLFN/I8zARL6eSF3RmkX2W/J41HozZq3jo4jdtKtYIL/kfMARlM3O/YcRao tM7LkD9cn76b2xjJqcGU0UEuyKxSahHEwd7zRO9agRQHdS5R4/c4lA9RBBpLDjY9 junLtKNNvNA254ONy1DYOgC7h4XP+DRuF0B+emi2+wiJXSoc= Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dkim-shared; d=getmarketing123.com; h=Received:Received:X-Originating-IP:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=ix4H29QvbyBb8wiUnuDVjALYmMmnWjeUwQ/lbVHBvoKof/ZNOAzzD36MUQ4Jds 6AA3J4NtxU+G1CTNSNecmiC4Y5bk6M+scF8hH17wwFpH/lbmxG5mPY6L8sBrl1rY Du15R3x51CvRY2yQqPn7n8g5P/9pGC4KcIh+lnAO7upzw=; Received: (qmail 28414 invoked by uid 399); 5 Apr 2016 14:55:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO OfficePC) (adam03@getmarketing123.com@180.87.254.74) by mail1102.opentransfer.com with ESMTPAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM; 5 Apr 2016 14:55:53 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 180.87.254.74 From: "Adam Gibbs" To: Subject: Let Google Help Your Customers Find You Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 20:25:17 +0530 Message-ID: <0f1e01d18f4b$4043cf40$c0cb6dc0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AdGPSyksEqVEok3iQb6avLN+4m3Zlw== Content-Language: en-us Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:02:35 -0000 Hi freebsd.org Team, Hope you are doing well. I thought you might like to know some of the reasons why you are not getting enough organic & social media traffic for your website. I would like to update you that, your website is still not ranked on the top pages of Google SERPs for your popular keywords (Products). Your loss is your competitor's gain i.e. the traffic which could have generated quality sales for you goes to your competitors as they rank well in the Search Engine Result Pages (SERPs) organically. Reasons: 1. HTML and other on-page errors are present on your website. 2. Your home page rank is 9 out of 10. 3. Duplicate or low quality contents present in your website without any regular update. 4. Need to update fresh contents on your website and blogs as per the latest Google guideline. 5. Social media profile needs to be updated regularly. If you want to know more such points about what your site needs, and are curious to know what our working together would involve, then I would be glad to provide you with further detailed analysis in the form of a FREE SITE ANALYSIS REPORT. Long gone are the days when Google used to give priority to websites with huge number of links. Now Google counts each and every detail to verify if your website is relevant to the keywords you are promoting for. A single un-wanted link or a duplicate content can lead your website to be penalized by Google. To brief you about the company: We do SEO, SMO and reputation management for our clients. Our team of dedicated Google Analytic and Adwords certified professionals excel in promoting and increasing the visibility of a website in various search engines (including the latest Google Panda and Penguin updates), which will directly help in increasing traffics for your website. Unlike other SEO companies we do not believe in talking rather we believe in delivering what we promise to our clients. We provide guaranteed services or money back-guarantee to all our clients who consider working with us. This email just tells you the fraction of things we do, our optimization process involves many other technical factors which can be sent to you on your request. If you would like to know more about our services then please write us. If you are getting rigid by paying a huge amount in PPC then Organic listing by using white hat technique will be definitely a right choice for you. Feel free to email us or alternatively you can provide your best time and phone number to call you. P.S: - This is our marketing strategy that we use the Gmail account. Once you reply us back, the next communication I will do is from my corporate email ID. Let me know your thoughts and looking forward to work together. Best Regards, Adam Gibbs | Senior SEO Adviser Skype: adamgibbs9 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- Disclaimer: This is an advertisement and a promotional mail strictly on the guidelines of CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. We have clearly mentioned the source mail-id of this mail and the subject lines and they are in no way misleading in any form. We have found your mail address through our own efforts on the web search and not through any illegal way. If you find this mail unsolicited, please reply with "unsubscribe" in the subject line and we will take care that you do not receive any further promotional mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Apr 5 15:33:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4739AB036AB for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 15:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC26615C0 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 15:33:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id n3so26933965wmn.0 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:33:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bris-ac-uk.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:cc:reply-to:in-reply-to; bh=v+4ssXy96bSMMA+UlCq8wZod0/qE2SMJz2sjvmtf+xI=; b=MUklcPVJdXvAgzK9Wr6Py2LADunV80aiEsLerrIGsPxk8cw2IfkgLwseRQxLAONRC8 qlIy8BK014mQuDSwmzk8OdRi1ZjQNgYptMep4f9xQMzTMEPJj+shNStQHug2LJ7YFaNN rrQY1izdD9CckCHFj6NaDVIfOMtZEa6Yila32lpFIg+bu7LIa4KwpjfoNDmPRHXVsXHx DRk9zaj++ZX31+aMLFIDrlb3y/GVxLLy95iWrSDrkSP3mXWJrxjUngET4gGSVDekUa3E Ic86C4kCNfJ7frpnaD5nMPDdT1la1YNl7C98Xe6e+zREhHj+6zHwcH640+IGEC9n9ygz 22IA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:cc:reply-to :in-reply-to; bh=v+4ssXy96bSMMA+UlCq8wZod0/qE2SMJz2sjvmtf+xI=; b=QCw74hv4wA7xaWm/QPPosgd4ozYr8nhNAMSBrXB1394huW3HtG30l/mvE8BZbrM/NP Ek4NGCnetT/0uVvxTcCE4O3v/pSGJAV2ugckCCbP09fJ15+EN0Dyolmj+WYs+KmIYDN5 mrTD+FHKJQMkqMnP5iMXBvgvis+1l7AaVm5r3O6i4G8rZw+xPQoR09iHeVsUlIyk33KP eZgaKZiAP7jLEaLKKC6MQ4cC5FbncRAMElDWpeRx0Id5/gBJLRlJLwrR9RSvjSq24o63 ataMIM4lX8+iy1BRr45LuQS3xrpPN9PH2EDRGB6bVA8igewToh119kHV2IbFKM0wCuRd SChg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJaaMby5uZ3ig6t5b9FRyIxOhtzXInHjMpPJReJw3YILUEhEydX/9h+7LOwsdb4Py40 X-Received: by 10.28.140.12 with SMTP id o12mr4196678wmd.19.1459870436296; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:33:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk. [137.222.170.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q139sm20160690wmd.2.2016.04.05.08.33.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Apr 2016 08:33:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u35FXs9o060150; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:33:54 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u35FXskq060149; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:33:54 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:33:54 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht Message-Id: <201604051533.u35FXskq060149@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> To: mexas@bris.ac.uk, till.oliver.knoll@gmail.com Subject: Re: when do I need to set JAVA_HOME? Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Reply-To: mexas@bris.ac.uk In-Reply-To: <0B98F374-862C-4433-A774-56D266CA4CDB@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 15:33:58 -0000 >From till.oliver.knoll@gmail.com Mon Apr 4 21:57:13 2016 > >> Am 04.04.2016 um 13:04 schrieb Anton Shterenlikht : >> >> I'm having troubles running an openGL >> 3D visualisation over ssh -Y: >> >> javax.media.opengl.GLException: Error making context current >> at com.sun.opengl.impl.x11.X11GLContext.makeCurrentImpl(X11GLContext.java:141) >> at com.sun.opengl.impl.x11.X11OnscreenGLContext.makeCurrentImpl(X11OnscreenGLContext.java:69) >> at > >Hello list, > >The exception above sais that "OpenGL cannot activate ("make current") the desired (requested) graphic context". That is usually the case when the GPU (graphic card) does not provide the requested features such as bit depth or features such as double-buffering (actually that would fail already at OpenGL context /creation/ time, but let's skip over the details here, shall ww ;)). > >The point is to me it doesn't look like a class is missing, which would hint at a missing CLASSPATH. It is really an error at runtime, after all classes have been loaded. > >It could still be that some (non-mandatory) OpenGL driver is not found (in the JAVA CLASSPATH), but my suspicion goes towards SSH: we are talking about a remote connection, right? Could well be that your remote X client (or was it the X Server? IIRC those X11 people have a weitd notion of "server" and "client" - but never mind ;)), that is the display "where you eventually show the app", claims to have features (for the created GL context) which it doesn't (or the "X Server" on the remote display is simply buggy). > >All that said: does the application run locally (without SSH)? Oliver, thank you. I haven't got the application locally. Need to build from sources and it will pull in lots of other dependencies. However, I can give it a go if all else fails. What I can see is that locally, i.e. on the X server (the local laptop where I view the results) glxgears runs fine and glxinfo returns this: GLX version: 1.4 Extended renderer info (GLX_MESA_query_renderer): Vendor: Intel Open Source Technology Center (0x8086) Device: Mesa DRI Intel(R) Haswell Mobile (0xa16) Version: 11.1.2 Accelerated: yes Video memory: 1534MB Unified memory: yes Preferred profile: core (0x1) Max core profile version: 3.3 Max compat profile version: 3.0 Max GLES1 profile version: 1.1 Max GLES[23] profile version: 3.0 which looks fine, no? > Do other OpenGL applications run over SSH > (with a comparable feature set, that is, > do they make use of the same OpenGL version features, e.g. "OpenGL 3.3" or even 4.x)? Don't know for sure. Maybe you can suggest a test application? I sometimes use the Abaqus, a proprietary CAD software on the remote cluster. If I want to view the 3D via ssh, I have to launch the application with "-mesa" switch, otherwise it fails with the following errors, which, as I understand mean that there are no GL acceleration on the remote cluster side. Maybe I'm wrong? $ abaqus viewer libGL error: failed to open drm device: No such file or directory libGL error: failed to load driver: i965 libGL error: dlopen /usr/lib64/dri/swrast_dri.so failed (/usr/lib64/dri/swrast_dri.so: undefined symbol: drm_intel_get_reset_stats) libGL error: unable to load driver: swrast_dri.so libGL error: failed to load driver: swrast X Error: code 2 major 154 minor 3: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation). X Error: code 170 major 154 minor 5: GLXBadContext. X Error: code 0 major 154 minor 26: 0. X Error: code 2 major 154 minor 3: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation). X Error: code 170 major 154 minor 5: GLXBadContext. Warning: Your system needs to be reconfigured to allow OpenGL rendering to a pixmap or Pbuffer; otherwise, you will not be able to print or use the probe function in Abaqus/CAE. X Error: code 170 major 154 minor 5: GLXBadContext. X Error: code 0 major 154 minor 26: 0. terminate called after throwing an instance of 'nex_PrimException' Abaqus Error: Abaqus/CAE Kernel exited with an error. Abaqus Error: Abaqus/Viewer exited with an error $ Many thanks again Anton From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Apr 5 22:37:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43C4B03710 for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 22:37:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from forward7h.cmail.yandex.net (forward7h.cmail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f35::e7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Yandex CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0CDC163D for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 22:37:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from smtp3h.mail.yandex.net (smtp3h.mail.yandex.net [84.201.186.20]) by forward7h.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 3ACEF21212 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 01:37:35 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp3h.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3h.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id F2BD11B42844 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 01:37:34 +0300 (MSK) Received: by smtp3h.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id FTXDy1lgEU-bXte3Bpx; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 01:37:34 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1459895854; bh=/5JypqAeB4iveRk3GqiwgWuflRhLpEGffTFSZUa4Uf8=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:Content-Type:X-Mailer: Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ge5KEwDtBQTwch7VGyQKAW1xJAUUxLGndzKvBelVMBjnsY2G8NhV7e05f+vI6hJT4 Vnk/g3VAmqgUYd0gHlSraI59b0P7fsG4qfvjbEFP8H3DExAO4kwdvVNHBfSQ8eMv63 0cnkupuxjUS+F0B7fFa1WzYx1sNz3j8W/sxfnLFw= Authentication-Results: smtp3h.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com X-Yandex-ForeignMX: US X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0 Message-ID: <1459895852.51322.8.camel@yandex.com> Subject: console resolution on FreeBSD 10.3 From: Stari Karp To: FreeBSD Questions Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 18:37:32 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 22:37:49 -0000 Hi! Yesterday I upgrade FreeBSD 10.2 with freebsd-update to 10.3. In /boot/loader.conf I have/had kern.vty=vt loader_logo="beastie" sbp_load="YES" cuse4bsd_load="YES" I boot computer in console and than I use "startx" to load GNOME or Fluxbox where I have resolution 2560x1440 (16:9). When I switch from GNOME to console (ctrl-alt-F?) I got resolution much smaler. I think is 1200x??? but before on FreeBSD 10.2 resolution was the same I just used different fonts. Is it now something different, please? Should I put resolution in /boot/loader.conf or use vt_efib or vt_vga? Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 02:37:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788CFB04C53 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 02:37:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bethany876@mail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C291D4F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 02:37:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bethany876@mail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6319EB04C52; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 02:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C21B04C50 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 02:37:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bethany876@mail.com) Received: from matrix.ar.krakow.pl (matrix.ar.krakow.pl [149.156.33.252]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291071D4E for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 02:37:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bethany876@mail.com) Received: by matrix.ar.krakow.pl (Server, from userid 111) id 097581CF4A1; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 04:16:56 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mx.ur.krakow.pl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_40, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from matrix.ar.krakow.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by matrix.ar.krakow.pl (Server) with ESMTP id A83BF1D263D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 03:19:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.33.69.38] (unknown [46.20.33.69]) by matrix.ar.krakow.pl (Server) with ESMTPSA id 563291D7A67 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 02:28:51 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: To: questions@FreeBSD.org From: "Joanna K" Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 01:29:05 +0100 Reply-To: info.pfgservices@rogers.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Message-Id: <20160406011934.A83BF1D263D@matrix.ar.krakow.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: Mail message body X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 02:37:05 -0000 Hello questions@FreeBSD.org, We offer private loans and loans for business creation at the preferential= interest rate (2% per year). For your questions we are happy to help you. Regards, Joanna.Kowalska From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 02:49:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209F0B04F9A for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 02:49:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bethany876@mail.com) Received: from matrix.ar.krakow.pl (matrix.ar.krakow.pl [149.156.33.252]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D91C21104 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 02:49:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bethany876@mail.com) Received: by matrix.ar.krakow.pl (Server, from userid 111) id DECB01D0EFE; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 02:08:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mx.ur.krakow.pl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_40, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from matrix.ar.krakow.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by matrix.ar.krakow.pl (Server) with ESMTP id AD0091C7E28 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 01:33:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.33.69.38] (unknown [46.20.33.69]) by matrix.ar.krakow.pl (Server) with ESMTPSA id 57E861CF77E for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 01:23:36 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org From: "Joanna K" Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 00:23:49 +0100 Reply-To: info.pfgservices@rogers.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Message-Id: <20160405233326.AD0091C7E28@matrix.ar.krakow.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: Mail message body X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 02:49:21 -0000 Hello freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, We offer private loans and loans for business creation at the preferential= interest rate (2% per year). For your questions we are happy to help you. Regards, Joanna.Kowalska From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 05:16:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4576B0477B for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 05:16:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bblister@gmail.com) Received: from mbob.nabble.com (mbob.nabble.com [162.253.133.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D56F16F7 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 05:16:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bblister@gmail.com) Received: from msam.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.85]) by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7690E249652C for ; Tue, 5 Apr 2016 22:04:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 22:16:49 -0700 (MST) From: BBlister To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1459919809712-6089883.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <57039DFE.7010309@FreeBSD.org> References: <1459853260874-6089694.post@n5.nabble.com> <57039DFE.7010309@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: invalid chunk added : please help me fix it MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 05:16:52 -0000 root@bigb5:~ # uname -a FreeBSD bigb5.vlsi.gr 9.3-STABLE FreeBSD 9.3-STABLE #5 r280395: Tue Mar 24 02:22:38 EET 2015 root@bigb5.vlsi.gr:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/bigb5 amd64 root@bigb5:~ # ls -l /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos ls: /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos: No such file or directory pkg conf is empty root@bigb5:~ # more /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf root@bigb5:~ # ls -l /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 0 Jul 12 2014 /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf pkg -vv Version : 1.7.1 PKG_DBDIR = "/var/db/pkg"; PKG_CACHEDIR = "/var/cache/pkg"; PORTSDIR = "/usr/ports"; INDEXDIR = ""; INDEXFILE = "INDEX-9"; HANDLE_RC_SCRIPTS = false; DEFAULT_ALWAYS_YES = false; ASSUME_ALWAYS_YES = false; REPOS_DIR [ "/etc/pkg/", "/usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/", ] PLIST_KEYWORDS_DIR = ""; SYSLOG = true; ABI = "FreeBSD:9:amd64"; ALTABI = "freebsd:9:x86:64"; DEVELOPER_MODE = false; VULNXML_SITE = "http://vuxml.freebsd.org/freebsd/vuln.xml.bz2"; FETCH_RETRY = 3; PKG_PLUGINS_DIR = "/usr/local/lib/pkg/"; PKG_ENABLE_PLUGINS = true; PLUGINS [ ] DEBUG_SCRIPTS = false; PLUGINS_CONF_DIR = "/usr/local/etc/pkg/"; PERMISSIVE = false; REPO_AUTOUPDATE = true; NAMESERVER = ""; HTTP_USER_AGENT = "pkg/1.7.1"; EVENT_PIPE = ""; FETCH_TIMEOUT = 30; UNSET_TIMESTAMP = false; SSH_RESTRICT_DIR = ""; PKG_ENV { } PKG_SSH_ARGS = ""; DEBUG_LEVEL = 0; ALIAS { } CUDF_SOLVER = ""; SAT_SOLVER = ""; RUN_SCRIPTS = true; CASE_SENSITIVE_MATCH = false; LOCK_WAIT = 1; LOCK_RETRIES = 5; SQLITE_PROFILE = false; WORKERS_COUNT = 0; READ_LOCK = false; PLIST_ACCEPT_DIRECTORIES = false; IP_VERSION = 0; AUTOMERGE = true; VERSION_SOURCE = ""; CONSERVATIVE_UPGRADE = true; PKG_CREATE_VERBOSE = false; AUTOCLEAN = false; DOT_FILE = ""; REPOSITORIES { } VALID_URL_SCHEME [ "pkg+http", "pkg+https", "https", "http", "file", "ssh", "ftp", "ftps", "pkg+ssh", "pkg+ftp", "pkg+ftps", ] ALLOW_BASE_SHLIBS = false; WARN_SIZE_LIMIT = 1048576; Repositories: FreeBSD: { url : "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:9:amd64/latest", enabled : yes, priority : 0, mirror_type : "SRV", signature_type : "FINGERPRINTS", fingerprints : "/usr/share/keys/pkg" } I rm'ed the empty file pkg.conf and now it seems that the above messages have disappeared. I am not sure how the pkg.conf was emptied in the first place. It used to work for many months without any problems. On another FreeBSD machine that I had the same exact warning messages and had some entries in the pkg.conf (attached bellow), I again rm'ed the file and this upgrade works smoothly. Both machines are FreeBSD 9.3-STABLE. So for me, everything seems to be ok! Thanks! [attached: This was on my pkg.conf which caused invalid chunk messages. I rm'ed and the messages disappeared ] [root@zafora /zstorage/home/mdasyg]# more /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf # System-wide configuration file for pkg(8) # For more information on the file format and # options please refer to the pkg.conf(5) man page # Configuration options #PKG_DBDIR : /var/db/pkg #PKG_CACHEDIR : /var/cache/pkg #PORTSDIR : /usr/ports #PUBKEY : /etc/ssl/pkg.conf #HANDLE_RC_SCRIPTS : NO #ASSUME_ALWAYS_YES : NO #SYSLOG : YES #SHLIBS : NO #AUTODEPS : NO #PORTAUDIT_SITE : http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/auditfile.tbz #PKG_PLUGINS_DIR : /usr/local/lib/pkg/plugins #PKG_ENABLE_PLUGINS : YES #PLUGINS : [commands/mystat] #REPO_AUTOUPDATE : YES ALIAS : { all-depends: query %dn-%dv, annotations: info -A, build-depends: info -qd, download: fetch, iinfo: info -i -g -x, isearch: search -i -g -x, leaf: query -e "%a == 0" "%n-%v", leaf: query -e "%a == 0" "%n-%v", list: info -ql, origin: info -qo, provided-depends: info -qb, raw: info -R, required-depends: info -qr, shared-depends: info -qB, show: info -f -k, size: info -sq, } and [root@zafora /zstorage/home/mdasyg]# pkg -v 1.7.1 -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/invalid-chunk-added-please-help-me-fix-it-tp6089694p6089883.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 06:54:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7AAB0636A for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 06:54:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90B311639 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 06:54:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5C390A2F8 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 06:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/5C390A2F8; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: invalid chunk added : please help me fix it To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1459853260874-6089694.post@n5.nabble.com> <57039DFE.7010309@FreeBSD.org> <1459919809712-6089883.post@n5.nabble.com> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <5704B27F.2040707@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 07:53:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1459919809712-6089883.post@n5.nabble.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Tam8G0T1XBoXx6M6jUXwHFQJFguUgJfKk" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.1 at smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 06:54:03 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Tam8G0T1XBoXx6M6jUXwHFQJFguUgJfKk Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MRVhc9PwIvKCcOGXXNDvrFqBllTkNfVAX" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <5704B27F.2040707@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: invalid chunk added : please help me fix it References: <1459853260874-6089694.post@n5.nabble.com> <57039DFE.7010309@FreeBSD.org> <1459919809712-6089883.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1459919809712-6089883.post@n5.nabble.com> --MRVhc9PwIvKCcOGXXNDvrFqBllTkNfVAX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06/04/2016 06:16, BBlister wrote: > I rm'ed the empty file pkg.conf and now it seems that the above messag= es > have disappeared. I am not sure how the pkg.conf was emptied in the fir= st > place. It used to work for many months without any problems. >=20 > On another FreeBSD machine that I had the same exact warning messages a= nd > had some entries in the pkg.conf (attached bellow), I again rm'ed the f= ile > and this upgrade works smoothly. Both machines are FreeBSD 9.3-STABLE. An empty pkg.conf should not generate errors like that. A fix for this problem has been committed to the git repo and will be in the next release, which should be out within a day or so. Cheers, Matthew --MRVhc9PwIvKCcOGXXNDvrFqBllTkNfVAX-- --Tam8G0T1XBoXx6M6jUXwHFQJFguUgJfKk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXBLKGXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkAToMMP/i+T4HpJ8xVoZNIgbqEY9eP0 jKYY9mT8PzuNwpeoasgx1xZlBRpOgplF5sgIwQLE/RgEt1xFOimJfYqRpyxAJEFK ZnQtooQOXSKxYyvxqW0DbKpsRFah9ea5j0jaDcIyTVRXR5RVDWekTJTZnAy8J86i Qfx0CFSTMEgUFNN8di3olTZtrbCu+TRZE+0Ds/BGLD6taMXzbCOm4POcQolQnlyF 1v54aBlqiyaFCPXS2CkyimqT04imtR1S3hswMJMANuvLS4OrrNu6btgFWzSy0Yxj vub4/wIj9dBIPcKiwViDNhYRkU/Mq+8wj2Se9n4jyPiNoVNUNV97QJkwl+qW3agz RV/i4qoCTo5KU3Xjj+IttBLnFSQqdQ1fH3Z79sA7SuAsNvmE38UKMfnSPC5uq7NE 5dxU71chsUW3sU/lUMXpmDokjQVQyNx7haHcZoA5pgEYHsgjUxCzAlHKMK1pTRhL G7EMk6R++FJvyoCiKtCRGPoIVrsDuS6xKAOCDMDol9g9mGyKzmvFbXTodvJySeVE iBkwc560RSVVBhU07MjbpJAB6I/4vT/9QsUBu34ShwZpdm5WvAH2xdW0ihQB6BSA sfUSq9pxtcTSQGRsU3a5qtPxTawAx1bhuwmRXDqUKU77lZYdq1Jw6KKqCcudwZip tzKp1bT530HI+PkhIdWb =lBOG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Tam8G0T1XBoXx6M6jUXwHFQJFguUgJfKk-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 12:34:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6C1B039D6; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 12:34:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x22a.google.com (mail-io0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7ECE1C5A; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 12:34:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id q128so53900713iof.3; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 05:34:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cKc5xN9giuuvOlrY/QZ8l/WYBQpCh9/oFgXWSTd7nDY=; b=UfG9j1k0hM+4b5kbviZees5fhcXO11tQvme1zDUTmtkvEAtAmanS2Qu4HRjbmqFKq6 +IoEzzmJxkreXYokGMsqv/zFytlshI8Fxt4MLdCSPKb4IEWovOhkUTHKOpcIHemWr6ln I8IUrYDM+r5F0EwSVElOGEfgozw/wtPbnJN2thii3zkRGSPb61rzyW0FVECbXNGEnd2g JZLZbvpXpoFuA4NG9EZ0NhnzU2ecY6T+x3xPgabx2weZFUyP5D0a5SMXUfBv7utgOPhN PHG3qvR3k8vVem9/t6Fcd716VFTd9iBTT0OB3789XamsZZlFWBBfwNosahFt1pGb/u7Q 7WKA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cKc5xN9giuuvOlrY/QZ8l/WYBQpCh9/oFgXWSTd7nDY=; b=E8BRFMOeHtuZpglQkO+H4AVv/LlEuIWusJPT9MvLOupmqX6kAc22W451rx3/zchGp5 3+KaNQhJlWlAPXgTD/BySul2tLKcDIhzLntlgGZgDTI8e4NgDwU7vF4Eeyr12GiXfBc4 YEhHMvxWMmWjxBKXf9RP+uaZ+6yjn6zEfju+AQogB0AwdSyA8F+ojVpjKPPx/PDdKBBn zBQNh6nXxmbyXzpFdtUrIEAHdrKkNeSsEwrkycTTjo7RRXaRR7xAGvdwcvK4cm/B/+5E fqjUp/AtKMJINUDQAj5Y0ZZZZibIZYDzsdWlQTmFuul4nt+tlEzhe1gscgmr+8UOJOij P+Ow== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLOW7S80dKx3mxurmKi6P6gOXExiJJbFVhdpJFzT+rai+VxdA+gmBHI62HRU1istg== X-Received: by 10.107.6.214 with SMTP id f83mr29466686ioi.122.1459946059990; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 05:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.10.3] (cpe-76-190-244-6.neo.res.rr.com. [76.190.244.6]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id x3sm1329727igl.11.2016.04.06.05.34.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 06 Apr 2016 05:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <57050250.4020700@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 08:34:24 -0400 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freebsd Questions , "freebsd-doc@freebsd.org" Subject: REL 10.3 has no md5 checksum Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 12:34:24 -0000 I see differences between previous releases of FreeBSD and the new 10.3 release dealing with the ftp download sites. The path has changed. The MD5 checksum files are missing. There is a new .xz suffix on the end of some .iso files. Didn't see anything about this in the Release notes. https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.3R/announce.html does say the sha256 and md5 hashes follow at the bottom of the message. But only sha256 & sha512 hashes are shown. Think some corrections are in order. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 13:59:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D57FB056A4 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 13:59:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from mx-p1.obspm.fr (mx-p1.obspm.fr [145.238.193.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "*.obspm.fr", Issuer "TERENA SSL CA 3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B97211074 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 13:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from pcjas.obspm.fr (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx-p1.obspm.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/DIO Observatoire de Paris - 15/04/10) with ESMTP id u36DwfGk026942 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:58:42 +0200 Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:58:41 +0200 From: Albert Shih To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Subject: chmod /var/run safe ? Message-ID: <20160406135841.GJ86675@pcjas.obspm.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (mx-p1.obspm.fr [145.238.193.20]); Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:58:42 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at mx-p1.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 13:59:26 -0000 Hi, I've some issue to allow some of my user to restart tomcat7. All tomcat7 file owned by let's say tomcat:tomcat, the user can do a sudo tomcat. But he cannot restart tomcat7 because /var/run are owned by root and the right are 755 so tomcat cannot put the /var/run/tomcat7.pid Of course I can change the location of this file but for that I need to patch /usr/local/etc/rc.d/tomcat7 and that's mean each time this script are update, I need to refix it. So is it safe to do chmod 1777 /var/run or they are other solution ? regards -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex France Téléphone : +33 1 45 07 76 26/+33 6 86 69 95 71 xmpp: jas@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: mer 6 avr 2016 15:55:45 CEST From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 14:07:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FF7B05A6D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 14:07:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cristiano.deana@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qg0-x232.google.com (mail-qg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24E55156D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 14:07:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cristiano.deana@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qg0-x232.google.com with SMTP id f105so12939064qge.2 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 07:07:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=J0CR4wL1RUsH6JQ590JWx7tXpz8poe9/bT+SQpYkxKA=; b=OlWm7CMgXc3NJKdIdh0oOEq8kos90Yp3prgzqSMOuylKrKwHnwqSiXDRC7w2tOaXbn dUMROX3+ReFy/z4AEFnpJYDIAdLDnHS2yauC7uc+tvYzJv2lZwVdsQV8aBRqj2pOs2ah K++VyAFrheIoBrG4GIXyoYGcY+3XgoRjexysnZgocYuKq5Wi6cVZRv8mPVU8LtuX4luC RMapd8Kmp53Wd1ApPuGBVPmN1btxpxbU6s6XRa4eBvW3z7ugZA6TIrY7JyTBXBAMI/I8 Rm81km6rcVAUdbmlpXKd9u31Nr1uPjaHvLyzbIz6UhEGQCSUpxJ7frRE0UsM7Ee+gRSL Wnjw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=J0CR4wL1RUsH6JQ590JWx7tXpz8poe9/bT+SQpYkxKA=; b=HZLjwBoh+KQPF8I/yK4XWvotsBha9OA67c2R3pyE+RJOMjhA1Q8Nrh0UFKvvQ1X3Fn GSYUTCKwTPH4ARM+zMrVpT5nlRDZjl7onGs20xT83mpPTNGAxL9yG6W8SE/9hvSY/a55 lA1mF2zLAlp2p6FFLgJEC0f2PXpNODXuGcHgcKbqTYF5AdHFTaksFkZNDsHTSMvGXWUJ UVyf7SRVzQRWIO4ScV6dPT0YgZ+2FdKrFH0TTnyxUYZpn5P0SEqfr7gIRPJU3grOVeaf I81vYyT7NKXTNTDqVZxLimE/X8lb/B0cf9s2i33l1TtV6+a7qaJGBzTkp6WvUJ0P7Vgm 5ghw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIbLbqjIQqhdH/ERCPsrqIEQ7QZlNytGF4xKMfPnNLki5ZlRsS3QOtDzbyHKmUZqnuL95/3VT9p7ykT0A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.147.135 with SMTP id 129mr10410031qht.54.1459951650233; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 07:07:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.140.101.106 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 07:07:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160406135841.GJ86675@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <20160406135841.GJ86675@pcjas.obspm.fr> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 16:07:30 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: chmod /var/run safe ? From: Cristiano Deana To: FreeBSD-Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:07:31 -0000 On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Albert Shih wrote: > or they are other solution ? Install sudo, permit `service tomcat7 restart' to all user in myfriends group. Put your friends in myfriends group. -- Cris, member of G.U.F.I Italian FreeBSD User Group http://www.gufi.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 15:02:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12D0B06D7D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:02:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from mx-p1.obspm.fr (mx-p1.obspm.fr [145.238.193.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "*.obspm.fr", Issuer "TERENA SSL CA 3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 972BC16B4 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:02:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from pcjas.obspm.fr (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx-p1.obspm.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/DIO Observatoire de Paris - 15/04/10) with ESMTP id u36F2qYf002657 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 6 Apr 2016 17:02:53 +0200 Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 17:02:52 +0200 From: Albert Shih To: Cristiano Deana Cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: chmod /var/run safe ? Message-ID: <20160406150252.GA8601@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <20160406135841.GJ86675@pcjas.obspm.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (mx-p1.obspm.fr [145.238.193.20]); Wed, 06 Apr 2016 17:02:53 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at mx-p1.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:02:56 -0000 Le 06/04/2016 à 16:07:30+0200, Cristiano Deana a écrit > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 3:58 PM, Albert Shih wrote: > > > or they are other solution ? > > Install sudo, permit > `service tomcat7 restart' to all user in myfriends group. > Put your friends in myfriends group. shame on me....:-( Sorry to disturb you.... Thanks. Regards -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex France Téléphone : +33 1 45 07 76 26/+33 6 86 69 95 71 xmpp: jas@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: mer 6 avr 2016 17:02:32 CEST From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 15:07:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA7AB06F2D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:07:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from shopzeus.com (shopzeus.com [87.229.70.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37391938 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:07:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from [127.127.127.127] (localhost [127.127.127.127]) (Authenticated sender: gandalf) by shopzeus.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 16467889C6B8 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 10:58:28 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shopzeus.com; s=shopzeus_com; t=1459954708; bh=+idU70kTvCzquLELSfcQd5uK9WYR+Oxgeqwxuf1fjy8=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:From; b=NgpG8h8VrEneLVmPAUTKpsZLA9NxqyTw+7DtsoAnxhlWiWtmmXYlRICPnuRWlMLmy DM4qu0zeyMgC9W3R6fVV6n4n2I4jehNAjWWl/LW1MKquo+KxiteTCydZHNzKUDt0rj anq0QD8cEumaVAxxpZzZGn7Fo54gB53Q42TUerEQD0d7ZU7EqlcE8UyAPqKTF7arZI uLLVRWrksVCPFv05c4l4XMm/3w2qBrngI6JJfQIhhZqj4rlJnyAKwSFmQjFOQ9p/Wm HiruJtVSeK9dMtYEIWo2CUZEHsZDgcsLQ+ZoNecVDWfAwR3gKkuJup0knPxmA6+mIF kVUUYxY6fDuHw== To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: =?UTF-8?Q?Nagy_L=c3=a1szl=c3=b3_Zsolt?= Subject: apache24 package broken in 10.3? Message-ID: <57052419.8010000@shopzeus.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 16:58:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:07:16 -0000 # uname -a FreeBSD examplebox 10.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE #0 r297264: Fri Mar 25 02:10:02 UTC 2016 root@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 # pkg update Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. # pkg install apache24 Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. The following 5 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: apache24: 2.4.18 expat: 2.1.0_3 apr: 1.5.2.1.5.4 gdbm: 1.11_2 db5: 5.3.28_3 The process will require 75 MiB more space. 16 MiB to be downloaded. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y Fetching apache24-2.4.18.txz: 100% 4 MiB 481.5kB/s 00:08 pkg: cached package apache24-2.4.18: size mismatch, fetching from remote Fetching apache24-2.4.18.txz: 100% 4 MiB 385.2kB/s 00:10 pkg: cached package apache24-2.4.18: size mismatch, cannot continue # From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 16:10:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB947B06721 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 16:10:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAC11E56 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 16:10:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B749DB06720; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 16:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EF0B0671F for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 16:10:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp209.alice.it (smtp209.alice.it [82.57.200.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FE0B1E55 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 16:10:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (82.58.25.117) by smtp209.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 56F2B487086EFDF5 for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 18:09:16 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u36G9ANV053766 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 18:09:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) To: questions@freebsd.org From: Andrea Venturoli Subject: Virtualizing Windows server Message-ID: <570534A6.1070909@netfence.it> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 18:09:10 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 16:10:16 -0000 Hello. I know this question or a similar one has probably come up several times, but I believe virtualization to be a moving target... I'm evaluating running a Windows 2012 virtual guest on a FreeBSD host. Anyone else is doing it? With VirtualBox? Is it stable enough? Is performance acceptable? Given enough hardware power, is this such a bad idea? Guess it isn't a "very good" idea, but in this situation I found no other option that i fully like. bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 16:48:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE8F5B0625A for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 16:48:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maxnix.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x244.google.com (mail-wm0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 509A511F3 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 16:48:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maxnix.bsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x244.google.com with SMTP id i204so14913880wmd.0 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:48:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4EcnatJTt4fO7OafiF09/9yalTLw++ErzLJc1OeOZvk=; b=DGJuW3YNcKrDLqQVJbbd34VpzqcPpzeyN3d8LN8T2hYU/Zec5lo0QY1+tvgvS5qnxc TIKNxx4P1IM9bUKqiOI1WwcH0ji/D6D6uTMaMTElLARW0tNiyYmAbDkCmAh0LbQPg+/D 9MUPSnNwNEP4dkvCLug50VsNB22fbQrUKHqMHaYoFUg0e0/jqmALj6cX+SQJkChUOz78 Y504YstfxGxbXhlNaFznaawee3dkx0jXWhYBgPzEDH8fPG3x7vl2raa3khI2caiX8p0X QU+OAJWAc/92YqbbhaS3EjtmZsmXIpm2MFhRWOSglFKlWK109tDL2dvPl06OV/6a0/hi Jojg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4EcnatJTt4fO7OafiF09/9yalTLw++ErzLJc1OeOZvk=; b=e9W46KOnpEPrOXzgYC562Yl1MvP6CdEjTllsRu+qMgZTR0i0Wa8Wz1G/EeE8vcxeZx Kd9ABNy2IRAqx2WvTWI9/bW9qwM1juxqjvpuoG4bE0FibQsm6PZlkaA+jVE0eC0WKzvI RagRQjxyJvrw7XJLZfabAIth0R3LPExd2/AC2BLu5lhOqTYz+Ri0Ci3Wh9M6tnmJt+rt kpBuKFPPMQ7BthGtzAhejmg1ZU9OLtrKeJp8X0m0drnzshpaSkIjqPa3trVq66rOhtYc pogQhmB8XRidXy1g8eYkkeSyD5JtcHGOrRRcMNOteePf2XIEHrG7F7BWNvc6cgIZ99a0 753A== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJyAkMrvbhtuo+qmWUG9ELQzFzEigpy4NlgUIKKf/PO4RjiLj3dkinaxvi4ZgiEtg== X-Received: by 10.28.53.134 with SMTP id c128mr25222177wma.10.1459961309674; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from max-BSD ([94.161.139.189]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w184sm4589969wmb.1.2016.04.06.09.48.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Apr 2016 09:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 18:48:23 +0200 From: maxnix To: Nagy =?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7M=?= Zsolt Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache24 package broken in 10.3? Message-ID: <20160406184823.2cda368a@max-BSD> In-Reply-To: <57052419.8010000@shopzeus.com> References: <57052419.8010000@shopzeus.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.29; i386-portbld-freebsd10.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 16:48:31 -0000 Il giorno Wed, 6 Apr 2016 16:58:33 +0200 Nagy L=C3=A1szl=C3=B3 Zsolt ha scritto: > # uname -a > FreeBSD examplebox 10.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE #0 r297264: Fri > Mar 25 02:10:02 UTC 2016 =20 > root@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > # pkg update > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > # pkg install apache24 > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > The following 5 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): >=20 > New packages to be INSTALLED: > apache24: 2.4.18 > expat: 2.1.0_3 > apr: 1.5.2.1.5.4 > gdbm: 1.11_2 > db5: 5.3.28_3 >=20 > The process will require 75 MiB more space. > 16 MiB to be downloaded. >=20 > Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y > Fetching apache24-2.4.18.txz: 100% 4 MiB 481.5kB/s 00:08 > pkg: cached package apache24-2.4.18: size mismatch, fetching from > remote Fetching apache24-2.4.18.txz: 100% 4 MiB 385.2kB/s 00:10 > pkg: cached package apache24-2.4.18: size mismatch, cannot continue > # >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I updated Apache yesterday, and had no problems. The errors you see could be caused (in my experience) by a damaged packgesite (or meta, don't remember well). Try cleaning pkg's cache with: pkg clan -ay and then force the update of the repository: pkg update -f HTH Maxnix From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 18:00:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53CABB069BE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 18:00:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from loriec69@aol.com) Received: from oms-a015e.mx.aol.com (oms-a015e.mx.aol.com [204.29.186.162]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AC1A1B30 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 18:00:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from loriec69@aol.com) Received: from omr-a018e.mx.aol.com (omr-a018.mx.aol.com [10.72.114.239]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oms-a015e.mx.aol.com (AOL Outbound OMS Interface) with ESMTPS id 63E823800C06 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 13:58:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mtaout-aaa01.mx.aol.com (mtaout-aaa01.mx.aol.com [172.27.1.225]) by omr-a018e.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 52187380006E for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 13:58:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from HP (unknown [197.242.118.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mtaout-aaa01.mx.aol.com (MUA/Third Party Client Interface) with ESMTPSA id 97C6938000083 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 13:58:47 -0400 (EDT) From: "Opinion Outpost" Subject: Customer Survey..Sign Up and Get Paid To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: skweng888@outlook.com Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 18:58:43 +0100 X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 160406-1, 06/04/2016), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean x-aol-global-disposition: S X-SPAM-FLAG: YES DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1459965528; bh=xEpYgaU7xDKmWdc1bXvmB76CvitXi/70EkfvQPT7tqo=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1aPqpUfICGqGNkoz7b9BQNGkiuBYgGCgFJU0mXvuoj2K1x+JpChcq1bF76TPm1/Wq NxIgDzCLd0pCE4+tg72aiVV92O/BqKTFUli2n6wljEKb5Hmwaf7kFSjDo2mM63crLn IGxFK3pVSkJ0FDIDkSCvYgoHjE03uONVj32Pq31w= X-AOL-REROUTE: YES x-aol-sid: 3039ac1b01e157054e570cb7 X-AOL-IP: 197.242.118.97 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 18:00:54 -0000 - This mail is in HTML. Some elements may be ommited in plain text. - We have a Customer Survey around your area, you will be paid $200 per = assignment which could come from a cashiers check along with comprhens= ive details on how you will perform your assignment. This Job entails = an evaluation process such as visting Wal-mart, Rite-aid, Walgreen ETC sign up to participate now. Mark Getting Shopper Inc Copyright (c) 2016 All Rights Reserved=AE From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 19:18:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33902B046B8 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:18:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sm@ara-ler.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1497D1474 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:18:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sm@ara-ler.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 10324B046B5; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:18:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB5BB046B2 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:18:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sm@ara-ler.com) Received: from mail-io0-x243.google.com (mail-io0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D89741472 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 19:18:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sm@ara-ler.com) Received: by mail-io0-x243.google.com with SMTP id z133so8799085iod.1 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 12:18:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ara-ler-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=oc6NdISOsGCbSkckdfsyiWEH6OQpYk3OsNEoD7Bfia8=; b=X7dYdEi7LtHtxhNl0TbG8kaHJxfuICZCtBy5aV8p1bXo4ZUptrAmSKXdJMp/CfXgKi gOo8XW/wjYxhNJRIZSV7P1iEspObWlaPcDcStP2F1ij8dLge6Emloi9ma9rzSe69rxAL +IPxHkYyhR8qOync/+a3BmiycOcOAAcwKgAFMrWdJf0HJZbodD1q1lK18aoWIobF2QNH 3LQRt9TaNZbn25Nz6XUa38D8riaZGVCFECyQ7nRRHoHT44+ZocBUQP43xeNnxTyJF/ba Lq7feEA/yuenX1YGM6PUeRAREa1vsLb/6Yyhk/jeqs3M77iy1cP9rp5JcabT2O9C0PoC kXUg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=oc6NdISOsGCbSkckdfsyiWEH6OQpYk3OsNEoD7Bfia8=; b=hBKPJ6e9s4M5OCYFIhehCOtrIm32reGlEqOercdwL32BrDkIPffQP2q78ooe8iXOUq P+FhogbjW2/EiorD33MsJFUR4Kw2WNsxFGtC7FLg3McYyynwDSCHmtC6WqeiVltFY5i0 pZaWt+jlVCJ5I8wFmYpdcEIuUEunhT+UCBPZ+aYhQxpmFJfrcdxangxBDOXZk1fmlzPf rM7rFCbyYi2yhOKh8VwrkebJ5lwqgf4jzFG6qdajnW2QZxfCcoqOgv1LmsCdizYqHyj2 xwbLdBuj9yI3acVj8TdgNQkVpIXtY1G+4+ccbKORXjHnEsJU2lgj0pMjaVzqHwYE3H3n WbVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJGJK9ohe20nmlueZt5sbP2FLBe1hWRhtUWEl1U6MRaruPLtywJ54deR7nIFL8DQA== X-Received: by 10.107.130.11 with SMTP id e11mr32311834iod.175.1459970327723; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 12:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian.ara-ler.com ([50.243.135.133]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g67sm2042939ioe.34.2016.04.06.12.18.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 06 Apr 2016 12:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 13:18:44 -0600 From: Sergey Manucharian To: Andrea Venturoli Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virtualizing Windows server Message-ID: <20160406191844.GI31492@debian.ara-ler.com> References: <570534A6.1070909@netfence.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <570534A6.1070909@netfence.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 19:18:49 -0000 Excerpts from Andrea Venturoli's message from Wed 06-Apr-16 18:09: > I know this question or a similar one has probably come up several times, > but I believe virtualization to be a moving target... > > I'm evaluating running a Windows 2012 virtual guest on a FreeBSD host. > > Anyone else is doing it? With VirtualBox? Is it stable enough? Is > performance acceptable? > Given enough hardware power, is this such a bad idea? > > Guess it isn't a "very good" idea, but in this situation I found no other > option that i fully like. > FreeBSD's native bhyve works fine for me for long time, I'm running Windows 2012 R2. https://wiki.freebsd.org/bhyve/Windows Sergey From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 20:08:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B0CB0655B for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:08:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com (mail-ig0-f170.google.com [209.85.213.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 260831A71 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:08:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-f170.google.com with SMTP id gy3so94486958igb.1 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 13:08:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:from:to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=tuqD5T0HEtFZpaNaA/OQiqhr9jcREnGO2t66HeEvWZA=; b=H/kmqDg6c2KycZ5I7HB/PemT+v2rJIOz0ASDFAtUiud2WRyVFiAvu31QCDlTNFA945 PvhTxx5zEnzcGv/flDKdrs/0Ik0dW6mdcjOQh3ckSaVOzkWG0KyBgYmhnVJY+2267/RG nvybv7FZpGVABtfyhm3oRKmYS2qGgY7LBSg51+NnkrTL0EZ9h3St+weurmbvS3t1BSQF 1rBd+cwTqUhUpI5SbOue3LTPT/sTiWRCoA4aoONuul75IDIMvaw3iZZgE9OeOwlYV2AO HvftFZixOfpcNY3gZxJozEaeUM6BiekNrzur9D+IYIauSSxzkttYmm5h1aG5WhxY2ERb nJTA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKmCvCP6n+BnMiODCrnW6EfzwABIaqUFn+t+tZwyqvkD6RLumr4o0lt0hjka7T4PQ== X-Received: by 10.50.111.163 with SMTP id ij3mr23659651igb.76.1459973314172; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 13:08:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WorkBox.Home.gmail.com (63-231-151-176.mpls.qwest.net. [63.231.151.176]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t5sm10085770igk.8.2016.04.06.13.08.32 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 06 Apr 2016 13:08:33 -0700 (PDT) User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 24.5.1 From: Brandon J. Wandersee To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Simple devd.conf rule has no effect Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:08:36 -0500 Message-ID: <86fuuywldn.fsf@WorkBox.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 20:08:41 -0000 Hi, folks. I'm trying to get my laptop screen to lock when the lid closes, using x11/slock. I've created the file /etc/devd/lidlock.conf with the following rule: | notify 0 { | match "system" "ACPI"; | match "subsystem" "Lid"; | match "notify" "0x00"; | action "/usr/local/bin/slock"; | }; This is really just a slight variation on the example from the devd.conf(5) man page. Now when I close the lid, the screen fails to lock, yet /var/log/messages displays the message "devd: Executing 'slock'". Any advice on what to look into to figure out why the program is not actually executed? Thanks in advace. -- :: Brandon J. Wandersee :: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com :: -------------------------------------------------- :: 'The best design is as little design as possible.' :: --- Dieter Rams ---------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 20:21:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCC0B06B8D; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:21:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x22d.google.com (mail-io0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A9B614CF; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:21:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id o126so47791952iod.0; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 13:21:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=3w4ILObA8oDiLMf+0JIobl8V5fxGZ48/zM9x8B0iPOA=; b=dG21h14CJrO8AwpdCq6qT1x1Tg5vFKNGc6+NUU3ueChDVb9b4RaA7fTW20c/HbB9Lw YN75WW5SbnyrX4u29qRDspoP4iq2Q+p+OmAlhALOsjVQ8uk2wbMZrlgGagSEPLvMSVI0 gb8+z3PucaLB00Wq39nAfldgAp6thHjEIds9treIYM28MzL9z3d7m3QEoNHoTH3rKijA h55Ta2dGCaHeQatQ8zkZtsQNg0ZSOPFObCfTmuN11ALLEqPQ9jar22xV77TlPbBf5pTq U8eMJt5gwp1T6rlUqDgWJ68XAv59q6atvAN03PXigIjC3pEfnRcChLMs/JZpO2NLdH/4 U6tQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=3w4ILObA8oDiLMf+0JIobl8V5fxGZ48/zM9x8B0iPOA=; b=C3z3FyRgOf2boXMTo3PBHHo6c5qX0jFAj0MnlSTgPto3yYznyDuKy/4kQiHqLe6QRP ++72ETMKPA6DrGCyBu2a/2wMIHLU3Hh9CxjEddANKvWF3dlsvQUDS7QFa64OR9UPCErR 2mXWljnX8UcwoGpYTXvi/jaTP3SpK1tETwvOc++0WIgG4jBWl+tz2SCiKRiY6U/KoiEV OyKepQ+9aBhsmwNCiK5brWMTbESmdrdziDl3ej0sFn3xEMBI0qw6N0J1dNbuGsjlNjh9 N8Cx+yPz2L4JcE8aMRKH3xauIRVy8yUsLBFjUFcJVbV34FyOFjGo6Sl6c5q+Q68IuTtl rjdw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJImLD6vIPcj8Gv020sNLajKdBAIElylA671HNbd7YP7K7mnnVLg776TH4byxxh1x2C0FchixgMnK0BuYQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.29.212 with SMTP id d203mr22684628iod.6.1459974093766; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 13:21:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.153.4 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 13:21:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57050250.4020700@gmail.com> References: <57050250.4020700@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 13:21:33 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: REL 10.3 has no md5 checksum From: Xin LI To: Ernie Luzar Cc: Freebsd Questions , "freebsd-doc@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 20:21:34 -0000 Not having MD5 was intentional ( https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/836068 ), but you are right that the announcement should not have MD5 mentioned at all. I'll create a ticket to track this. On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Ernie Luzar wrote: > I see differences between previous releases of FreeBSD and the new 10.3 > release dealing with the ftp download sites. > The path has changed. > The MD5 checksum files are missing. > There is a new .xz suffix on the end of some .iso files. > > Didn't see anything about this in the Release notes. > > https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.3R/announce.html does say the sha256 and > md5 hashes follow at the bottom of the message. But only sha256 & sha512 > hashes are shown. > > Think some corrections are in order. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Xin LI https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 20:27:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC07B06F27; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:27:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF7491AFD; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:27:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF041E63; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:27:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 20:27:44 +0000 From: Glen Barber To: Xin LI Cc: Ernie Luzar , "freebsd-doc@freebsd.org" , Freebsd Questions Subject: Re: REL 10.3 has no md5 checksum Message-ID: <20160406202744.GB1498@FreeBSD.org> References: <57050250.4020700@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XF85m9dhOBO43t/C" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64 X-SCUD-Definition: Sudden Completely Unexpected Dataloss X-SULE-Definition: Sudden Unexpected Learning Event X-PEKBAC-Definition: Problem Exists, Keyboard Between Admin/Computer User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 20:27:45 -0000 --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We cannot fix this in the announcement itself, but can note the bogus MD5 mention in the errata.html. Glen On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 01:21:33PM -0700, Xin LI wrote: > Not having MD5 was intentional ( > https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/836068 ), but you are right that the > announcement should not have MD5 mentioned at all. I'll create a > ticket to track this. >=20 > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Ernie Luzar wrote: > > I see differences between previous releases of FreeBSD and the new 10.3 > > release dealing with the ftp download sites. > > The path has changed. > > The MD5 checksum files are missing. > > There is a new .xz suffix on the end of some .iso files. > > > > Didn't see anything about this in the Release notes. > > > > https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.3R/announce.html does say the sha25= 6 and > > md5 hashes follow at the bottom of the message. But only sha256 & sha512 > > hashes are shown. > > > > Think some corrections are in order. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Xin LI https://www.delphij.net/ > FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-doc@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-doc > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-doc-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXBXFAAAoJEAMUWKVHj+KTbMMP/0cdpqhPZx2NmbJxibVoHMv2 Kn1uQ/CLHqy35YGx02zbibFMDzvNPixqSxJM2bkBNxMfxX0nFt0WW8DJK3PuH06E 48brbPNrQPu6r6cqdcmghc1Bin8RtxnAQ4YPd7UBUArdYi/udhq1IXqgBhdi56Wn oLINTO/Uv+EXRuCfYcM2RkKti3u5VhPovQ4IpOgo5chfcuAM5c5RlySd0hoSZUTs hVc8tTTXoiOMkC1RhTOTImPiYQ9C1cBRpOd1ND45Yr79wdQEytHL3twimJzuyEb8 NtEI5q+rsh+cPHpacfC4fF180jXE3z7Wxy9q3YqMOxZnIIJqLwHnaoFuyWqDhalG uK1Fh3by3eJ3N7nJ7d0N9DkGcjVtq/eHuuAM54erM/uwNDmEo3Pt+N2sNueT9XuT 23tZpKT8VMYLvaNJQu9FM9D80cs09nWheaJJCX2YvSlEnjXhct0FaUjcoFc+24jo PTaz4uxomA+O6MzLNUuMjlXgd1x2lpKLl0uPuIcQcW/Wp9WlB/JCI8mL4zoOBvu2 kD2Pf2esfszXnxmgDOyHIUodPeIFjv8p9YZsjQlRQQI5/gf35ZKYJ9hEaAb0P+RS Ql7HfyEs49EWQYUMcgANibn93pleSpaU6CZva5AmMH9NTNL2TkpniQTVOyZhp3Tt 23Zbi8Yh9bRWkC4vTx19 =CrQn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XF85m9dhOBO43t/C-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 21:37:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA98B064EE for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 21:37:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2C1E1D19 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 21:37:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u36Lb59i046641 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:37:05 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u36Lb5rW046638; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:37:05 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:37:05 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: "Brandon J. Wandersee" cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Simple devd.conf rule has no effect In-Reply-To: <86fuuywldn.fsf@WorkBox.Home> Message-ID: References: <86fuuywldn.fsf@WorkBox.Home> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:37:05 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 21:37:07 -0000 On Wed, 6 Apr 2016, Brandon J. Wandersee wrote: > > Hi, folks. I'm trying to get my laptop screen to lock when the lid > closes, using x11/slock. I've created the file /etc/devd/lidlock.conf > with the following rule: > > | notify 0 { > | match "system" "ACPI"; > | match "subsystem" "Lid"; > | match "notify" "0x00"; > | action "/usr/local/bin/slock"; > | }; > > This is really just a slight variation on the example from the > devd.conf(5) man page. Now when I close the lid, the screen fails to > lock, yet /var/log/messages displays the message "devd: Executing > 'slock'". Any advice on what to look into to figure out why the program > is not actually executed? Thanks in advace. devd(8) stuff runs as root, I think. So it probably does not have $DISPLAY set. Maybe use su to switch to the normal X user and execute the command: su -l xusername -c 'setenv DISPLAY :0.0 && /usr/local/bin/slock' From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 21:42:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580DAB067E6 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 21:42:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DF8510E6 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 21:42:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1anvDr-00015k-Es for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 23:42:48 +0200 Received: from 65.75.36.70 ([65.75.36.70]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 23:42:47 +0200 Received: from gyliamos by 65.75.36.70 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 23:42:47 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Will Parsons Subject: Re: Recovering from X "upgrade" disaster - now what? Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 21:42:40 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: Reply-To: gyliamos@gmail.com X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.75.36.70 User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (FreeBSD) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 01:11:57 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 21:42:57 -0000 On Thursday, 31 Mar 2016 1:20 AM -0400, Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2016, Will Parsons wrote: > >> The hardware in question (Lenovo Edge E520) doesn't appear to be >> particularly unusual (and was in fact working perfectly well previous >> to my attempt to "upgrade"). >> >> Is there anyone who can give me hope of recovering this system? >> (I *really* don't want to trash it and reinstall. And even if I did, >> would there be any reason to think it would work?) >> >> I'm desparate for a solution. > > Sorry about the late reply, I was hoping someone who had the same > machine might respond. > > The only thing I can suggest to try is adding > xrandr --auto > > to .xinitrc just before it runs the window manager. Otherwise, please > ask on the freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org mailing list. I'm sure it can work, > just don't know why it is not working now. Thank you for the suggestions, even if they failed to solve the problem. Happily, I have now got X working again, but to do so I had to restore the entire contents of /usr/local from a backup I had made about 6 months ago. I think what this means is that my pkg database is out of sync with the actual contents of /usr/local. What does this mean as far as further updating? I'd just as soon try to resolve the real problem, but am understandably reluctant to leave my system crippled again. -- Will From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Apr 7 03:51:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF139B0603D for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 03:51:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4F5A1B11 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 03:51:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u373pvKI027163 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 6 Apr 2016 21:51:57 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u373pvBA027160; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 21:51:57 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 21:51:57 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: gyliamos@gmail.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recovering from X "upgrade" disaster - now what? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 06 Apr 2016 21:51:57 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 03:52:00 -0000 On Wed, 6 Apr 2016, Will Parsons wrote: > Thank you for the suggestions, even if they failed to solve the > problem. > > Happily, I have now got X working again, but to do so I had to restore > the entire contents of /usr/local from a backup I had made about 6 > months ago. I think what this means is that my pkg database is out of > sync with the actual contents of /usr/local. What does this mean as > far as further updating? I'd just as soon try to resolve the real > problem, but am understandably reluctant to leave my system crippled > again. First, make a full backup of the system as it is. The easy way to fix the package database is the same thing that might resolve the problem. Reinstall all the packages, either as binaries or from ports. There is a procedure for ports at the end of the portmaster man page. For packages, I want to say it would be 'pkg install -af', but I have not tested it. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Apr 7 05:31:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E03B07FE6 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 05:31:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from shopzeus.com (shopzeus.com [87.229.70.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66251332 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 05:31:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from [127.127.127.127] (localhost [127.127.127.127]) (Authenticated sender: gandalf) by shopzeus.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 94E62889C6C0 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 01:31:14 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shopzeus.com; s=shopzeus_com; t=1460007074; bh=08dPojTA5zQ8dyZIxVHAEJturGlNm5A0ZIjEPzidjjo=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=UUnXUL5HXuNdE5FazJzZKb5lZt3RB6+OffzZltio1CVJPRxBAqsa/0ZfmwmXVapvR ZFULOCTd5uQSph2YZ5uZ4asVYov+oAcODJYMWDE5nTm0PZXz8LkH8a87lFZyfVZnNV QPG1RwIaXZhmABsyaZewCPjuvyqZugCy4O51RR0PUYnJq/jWXNDkpUcBKbZ0KzDlM6 AAoPpafEgu7/mF3W1jZO0xFclj6GfvuryZX1nxemRV8IrYBgm5fmI/YwwRt2ottnym KNG9yOx3RSlRe5K3+GcHHUK7DRBVFLVLQSMTidrmAeXddRR/bbv+6sotKMRLNegBKL HyS4C2LcFwCeg== Subject: Re: apache24 package broken in 10.3? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <57052419.8010000@shopzeus.com> <20160406184823.2cda368a@max-BSD> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Nagy_L=c3=a1szl=c3=b3_Zsolt?= Message-ID: <5705F0A6.1000303@shopzeus.com> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 07:31:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160406184823.2cda368a@max-BSD> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 05:31:19 -0000 > Try cleaning pkg's cache with: > pkg clan -ay > and then force the update of the repository: > pkg update -f > HTH Yes, this fixed the problem. Than you! From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Apr 7 06:59:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15266B07F69 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 06:59:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8516D1AE6 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 06:59:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04DDFA6B8 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 06:58:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/04DDFA6B8; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Recovering from X "upgrade" disaster - now what? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <5706051A.9080703@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 07:58:34 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sv0HLMTxX4N3rLQRJeAgntrRVHDVWxTAW" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.1 at smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 06:59:01 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --sv0HLMTxX4N3rLQRJeAgntrRVHDVWxTAW Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="lfwghjLEeRFvpCijLPBrFbtB3VDcwaE4n" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <5706051A.9080703@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Recovering from X "upgrade" disaster - now what? References: In-Reply-To: --lfwghjLEeRFvpCijLPBrFbtB3VDcwaE4n Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/04/2016 04:51, Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 6 Apr 2016, Will Parsons wrote: >=20 >> Thank you for the suggestions, even if they failed to solve the >> problem. >> >> Happily, I have now got X working again, but to do so I had to restore= >> the entire contents of /usr/local from a backup I had made about 6 >> months ago. I think what this means is that my pkg database is out of= >> sync with the actual contents of /usr/local. What does this mean as >> far as further updating? I'd just as soon try to resolve the real >> problem, but am understandably reluctant to leave my system crippled >> again. >=20 > First, make a full backup of the system as it is. >=20 > The easy way to fix the package database is the same thing that might > resolve the problem. Reinstall all the packages, either as binaries or= > from ports. There is a procedure for ports at the end of the portmaste= r > man page. For packages, I want to say it would be 'pkg install -af', > but I have not tested it. How comprehensive was that 6-month old backup? If it also happened to include /var/backup then you should also have a dump of the pkg DB from the same time. Cheers, Matthew --lfwghjLEeRFvpCijLPBrFbtB3VDcwaE4n-- --sv0HLMTxX4N3rLQRJeAgntrRVHDVWxTAW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXBgUgXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATWBEP/RrYX+UP9BjTOJ2VGTeYym8i DPwxuttY5cMQdZMWw62zYnIXk+axoyH0nRKcOiRJo5+R2ajuI2asLnA5KrunMSXJ ldVZmQns9fjJBT28j8iWD6Ui97FEVMH0HcG/9oZTyL83MbOoy6H3N7iP83ZVyk1e 0NR2lDV8T3MxNVUy/JHqjGVVqXw9WnfILlg8PidXgNYYd05uR2KVNPJOyJ/MB8Jc RnP8v3aiQUPdnIbfuN8U6Yj/SfC7xVdGoTMl8JYkT5WKpiKPM4I3lJ/6eydzpjwa k9GEtFePFg5/HTJuj9KmZQoG6dwWmLRx0KOQ7d9mAoP5fN+w9zKkQ2H/Ysu5qYgK t2daH1K8jGYfsvNJBsYaFAjnoVwcRuEdaNkG8PoHUeMtKDNCmQMZ5dAB7n7JZ+tQ 7AZgsJi6DmKQIgWxmEK/OYgmFYPgsoD/drqqFHONVazq8GF/EsNJVkqUOxkYKWvW QjKs84EZvMLaqzE8+E3Ofb6TkpT7oQ6rGPDkpPAV2XhFHaq6jst9F8Zoxgw88agJ OdGC9Mgmro1GqUhQZuzB4CJDO7xo5YxB7WGgU22RWtaMEfoX7a3OdyV1IoBL14If dq6I4qI64vaz5iKA7WS5ZqWNY0Pxqcog9g6YreWTIrM3T5mE2lB+d5Deff572mYQ ET+d4FIKUNz6XZ+ugFQB =3sXB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sv0HLMTxX4N3rLQRJeAgntrRVHDVWxTAW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Apr 7 14:08:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D792B0784A for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:08:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2F302000 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:08:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (user-24-214-48-39.knology.net [24.214.48.39]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id u37DmttG014739 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:48:56 -0500 Subject: Re: Recovering from X "upgrade" disaster - now what? References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "William A. Mahaffey III" Message-ID: <57066547.60405@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:54:25 -0453.75 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 14:08:22 -0000 On 04/06/16 22:58, Warren Block wrote: > On Wed, 6 Apr 2016, Will Parsons wrote: > >> Thank you for the suggestions, even if they failed to solve the >> problem. >> >> Happily, I have now got X working again, but to do so I had to restore >> the entire contents of /usr/local from a backup I had made about 6 >> months ago. I think what this means is that my pkg database is out of >> sync with the actual contents of /usr/local. What does this mean as >> far as further updating? I'd just as soon try to resolve the real >> problem, but am understandably reluctant to leave my system crippled >> again. > > First, make a full backup of the system as it is. > > The easy way to fix the package database is the same thing that might > resolve the problem. Reinstall all the packages, either as binaries > or from ports. There is a procedure for ports at the end of the > portmaster man page. For packages, I want to say it would be 'pkg > install -af', but I have not tested it. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > If he blindly reinstalls *all* pkg's, he will replicate the problem he just got done fixing. Might want to lock X11, maybe other stuff as well, before restoring pkg's .... $0.02, no more, no less .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Apr 7 14:35:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605CBB0602F for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vikashb@where-ever.za.net) Received: from mailbox.is.co.za (mailbox.is.co.za [196.35.45.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460CE1F47 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:35:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vikashb@where-ever.za.net) X-AuthUser: vikashb@where-ever.za.net Received: from laptop.where-ever.za.net ([196.35.45.20]:57173) by mailbox.is.co.za with [XMail 1.22 ESMTP Server] id for from ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 16:04:44 +0200 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, emulation@FreeBSD.org From: Vikash Badal Subject: building linux ports with x11/nvidia-driver-340 instead of x11/nvidia-driver Message-ID: <570668FB.1010308@where-ever.za.net> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 16:04:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 14:35:07 -0000 Greetings can anyone assist ? I am trying to build the following ports using x11/nvidia-driver-340 instead of x11-nvidia-driver : emulators/linux-c6 x11-toolkits/linux-c6-qt47-x11 graphics/linux-c6-glx-utils net-im/skype4 Is the a knob that i can add to allow me to use the older driver ? Thanks Vikash From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Apr 7 14:56:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24CFB067EA for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:56:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (ns.dreamchaser.org [66.109.141.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A7271D7A for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 14:56:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [192.168.151.122]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id u37EnLIV086300 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:49:22 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org From: Gary Aitken Subject: llvm37 build failure, libatomic? X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <57067324.8070603@dreamchaser.org> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:48:04 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [192.168.151.101]); Thu, 07 Apr 2016 08:49:22 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 14:56:42 -0000 Hi all, Updated ports (it's been quite a while) and attempting to rebuild x11 fails for llvm37 claiming the compiler needs libatomic and it's not there. What's the deal with libatomic? Attempting to build just llvm37: ===>>> Starting build for devel/llvm37 <<<=== ===>>> All dependencies are up to date ===> Cleaning for llvm37-3.7.1_1 ===> Found saved configuration for llvm37-3.7.1_1 ===> llvm37-3.7.1_1 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by llvm37-3.7.1_1 for building ===> Extracting for llvm37-3.7.1_1 => SHA256 Checksum OK for llvm-3.7.1.src.tar.xz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for cfe-3.7.1.src.tar.xz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for compiler-rt-3.7.1.src.tar.xz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for clang-tools-extra-3.7.1.src.tar.xz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for lld-3.7.1.src.tar.xz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for lldb-3.7.1.src.tar.xz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for openmp-3.7.1.src.tar.xz. /bin/mv /usr/ports/devel/llvm37/work/cfe-3.7.1.src /usr/ports/devel/llvm37/work/llvm-3.7.1.src/tools/clang /bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports/devel/llvm37/work/llvm-3.7.1.src/tools/clang/tools/scan-view/share cd /usr/ports/devel/llvm37/work/llvm-3.7.1.src/tools/clang/tools/scan-view && /bin/mv Resources/bugcatcher.ico Resources/FileRadar.scpt Resources/GetRadarVersion.scpt share ... ===> Configuring for llvm37-3.7.1_1 ===> Performing out-of-source build /bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports/devel/llvm37/work/.build -- The C compiler identification is GNU 4.8.5 -- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 4.8.5 -- Check for working C compiler using: Ninja -- Check for working C compiler using: Ninja -- works ... -- Looking for dlopen -- Looking for dlopen - not found -- Looking for __GLIBC__ -- Looking for __GLIBC__ - not found -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_INT64_T - Failed -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_UINT64_T - Failed -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T -- Performing Test HAVE_U_INT64_T - Failed -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB - Failed -- Looking for __atomic_fetch_add_4 in atomic -- Looking for __atomic_fetch_add_4 in atomic - not found CMake Error at cmake/modules/CheckAtomic.cmake:36 (message): Host compiler appears to require libatomic, but cannot find it. Call Stack (most recent call first): cmake/config-ix.cmake:291 (include) CMakeLists.txt:360 (include) -- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred! See also "/usr/ports/devel/llvm37/work/.build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log". See also "/usr/ports/devel/llvm37/work/.build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log". From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Apr 7 15:21:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC8BB070E9 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:21:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E4151BBA for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:21:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u37FLr2V028068 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Apr 2016 09:21:53 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u37FLrV6028065; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 09:21:53 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 09:21:53 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: "William A. Mahaffey III" cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Recovering from X "upgrade" disaster - now what? In-Reply-To: <57066547.60405@hiwaay.net> Message-ID: References: <57066547.60405@hiwaay.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 07 Apr 2016 09:21:53 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 15:21:55 -0000 On Thu, 7 Apr 2016, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 04/06/16 22:58, Warren Block wrote: >> On Wed, 6 Apr 2016, Will Parsons wrote: >> >>> Thank you for the suggestions, even if they failed to solve the >>> problem. >>> >>> Happily, I have now got X working again, but to do so I had to restore >>> the entire contents of /usr/local from a backup I had made about 6 >>> months ago. I think what this means is that my pkg database is out of >>> sync with the actual contents of /usr/local. What does this mean as >>> far as further updating? I'd just as soon try to resolve the real >>> problem, but am understandably reluctant to leave my system crippled >>> again. >> >> First, make a full backup of the system as it is. >> >> The easy way to fix the package database is the same thing that might >> resolve the problem. Reinstall all the packages, either as binaries or >> from ports. There is a procedure for ports at the end of the portmaster >> man page. For packages, I want to say it would be 'pkg install -af', but I >> have not tested it. > If he blindly reinstalls *all* pkg's, he will replicate the problem he just > got done fixing. Might want to lock X11, maybe other stuff as well, before > restoring pkg's .... $0.02, no more, no less .... No, locking packages is more likely a cause than a cure. The problem now is that there are files and applications that do not match what the package database thinks there are. Rebuilding everything makes sure that it is all consistent, and rebuilds the package database at the same time. The backup is there in case this is a problem with X rather than a problem with inconsistent packages. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Apr 7 15:25:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCCEBB072BA for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:25:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x230.google.com (mail-oi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A411A1E25 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 15:25:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x230.google.com with SMTP id p188so102855063oih.2 for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 08:25:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=je8i+2s6K8JPvIBvG5UiUI5gJiYRnRW+T71zTJi/XmI=; b=m4hGGotD0cCRub2W1a89ST9PDzLFhc+lSNGABVuatqbfyNIC+4eO70iv0KQpy8Wy40 2iRAXbaHZ5u9UR17qlm1TfOfRg+uRNjL7fX+u0yFW4mlU9E4umAsSNo7B2C4wa7TSO2X U6AvdUHCleGRWeIL1BixKRSjxFlql+6BFczUF2GBKoUBvuzyxBYZpaIrDb7FItmVW5kF RTc12NCdj9oTZNy7x6tSULBhgNxDUyh7S+zwnRrsYTDp9goykvZe6FmoIeP7C7sevfz3 fCNsayfDXzDkSiRkVRkHe72W6t/eKBgQ2gpmXH/m/ZQ+PrC0dHeXTHYi60YpWtomm94A KELg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from :to; bh=je8i+2s6K8JPvIBvG5UiUI5gJiYRnRW+T71zTJi/XmI=; b=HcVySRy5ioifeNV6m5zA6XV5WexibLV5I0dH4zt6soJ1a8zFy6VXlOoL/U0hb9E4mA 7OIRDJHVaZcAhBD88bui/zxrkqVcs/cDXP+dfofWk4hl67oDa10CFN8udr3wL+QP1ylW FoUfgt5IepYnw+rwMfVE1KOLjdDUN4F3IZfoFMgZ2ubtwW1Yjb3lECwHIAJlqg0hUyb3 IccBjWagStRFQ6bzYPwNqyDe+u7bGlRFyiciN4hTiUSFjvFRQ0/avzwvD/EnAPztUFZ+ KuJ2xp2THRywoT2tF6BP6Nd9CQlpGcPSJhMLqOx9ml84hIPcSbYTcNEDwZFYZSlwyLZv xPrg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJvj0vEOIdb+gzORg46Ai+wYIeFFrYeZIo5P4Qd818CvlsuW3XM0ZdQLFnrD1Tom7S9jq37JZKYF/Yq5w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.239.7 with SMTP id n7mr1738732oih.15.1460042747961; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 08:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.198.18 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 08:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 11:25:47 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mnyDGnvg1qiRYoCdGctHnJMzVEo Message-ID: Subject: AIO in 10.0-RELEASE From: Rick Miller To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 15:25:49 -0000 Hi all, A user has been implementing AIO features in an application. They assert that, despite aio(4) stating that it is enabled either statically (with VFS_AIO in the kernel config) or dynamically (kldload), in their development environment there was no requirement for either of these methods of enabling AIO. My google-foo is failing me when it comes to FreeBSD's AIO. This question defies logic, but is it possible that AIO works by default in earlier versions of 10.0 and not in more recent version of 10.0 without any local system changes? -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Apr 7 16:57:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BE6B080A8 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 16:57:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4ea:bd49:619b:6cb3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C6AC1CD5 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 16:57:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from zero-gravitas.local (unknown [85.199.232.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B726FA845 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 16:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/B726FA845; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: AIO in 10.0-RELEASE To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <5706918A.2060502@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 17:57:46 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X90Rsv5I2PNxC7E066v8JrF60bpLT4PwF" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.1 at smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 16:57:48 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --X90Rsv5I2PNxC7E066v8JrF60bpLT4PwF Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="tem552XPMcDOJDRlMwhePpP1RD71aJtOx" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <5706918A.2060502@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: AIO in 10.0-RELEASE References: In-Reply-To: --tem552XPMcDOJDRlMwhePpP1RD71aJtOx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016/04/07 16:25, Rick Miller wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > A user has been implementing AIO features in an application. They asse= rt > that, despite aio(4) stating that it is enabled either statically (with= > VFS_AIO in the kernel config) or dynamically (kldload), in their > development environment there was no requirement for either of these > methods of enabling AIO. My google-foo is failing me when it comes to > FreeBSD's AIO. >=20 > This question defies logic, but is it possible that AIO works by defaul= t in > earlier versions of 10.0 and not in more recent version of 10.0 without= any > local system changes? >=20 You asked a pretty similar question last month, where one of the replies pointed you to this in the UPDATING file: 20160301: The AIO subsystem is now a standard part of the kernel. The VFS_AIO kernel option and aio.ko kernel module have been removed.= Due to stability concerns, asynchronous I/O requests are only permitted on sockets and raw disks by default. To enable asynchronous I/O requests on all file types, set the vfs.aio.enable_unsafe sysctl to a non-zero value. In fact, that change was *after* 10.3 was branched, so 10.3-RELEASE should behave the same as 10.2 and earlier as far as AIO is concerned. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/10.3/UPDATING?revision=3D297262&vi= ew=3Dmarkup As far as I can tell from the manual, calls to aio_read(2) and similar functions should generate an ENOSYS error code, unless your system kernel has the aio module ceither compiled in or loaded. Which runs counter to your user's experience. I suggest asking on freebsd-hackers@... as you're more likely to come to the attention of the responsible developers there. Cheers, Matthew --tem552XPMcDOJDRlMwhePpP1RD71aJtOx-- --X90Rsv5I2PNxC7E066v8JrF60bpLT4PwF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXBpGQXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTneU8P/2lD6u/yYlPV/40zZwLSwWsp 8vFcp8zOd6VcdvzGwkuMWzu1TDxOy8tfSTkYaKjGHznMAgN+THSwkHFw9BVkFK+F 8XIkj06tbIPNqx5moLX7esEHJve9wDen0UfbGYNYmSBOaVtwoiep2KKAvacPxfdJ FFPUPE3niaQ00oMlD496IPD3PCD1KtLfQ5YjkW8vYk5bVKwyQk3Qg8Ct0IZ//Yt6 aV43M2AdZVOWr2UY494CdTHWA/w8GB/ShdsmMilNhEEpOwtZlTGgLxk1qwRofsKq cZv+B2zDW+K8sOfM/JTZXHvIFo47s/AXeP8W8Ic2UfV0j+DH2j8eFXYbVevs/G6W NAGn+JeNThAQLLrBZmGQ3IbOLzKUCsCsWicGoMROnDNeA/L2q0R+CMtFvSd7C56T +I3iLuH8/iMw+xPL8G4JahjIB/1cYLMoeBJ1PXY+auQ3DXqKHI0vBvjVpi3sNuxX bb+X9fpabPuKfajYEIQs0otX6iEPRZnIqIL8pnvi5v7jLPvc9LAwOLxn/jmnvpDD wfk7L+9wCN8r5VqKtW0jx1M5v+Jv/CXwlWZA7Uo5Q8+8aZ0ZTREeXmgtWLOCVcPk NOI7W8R8Pv8Cj6yeWcE+VHWuxM0Q2nfTlWb5mqywig/4IQ+iGcAkwXzW/y8RRn4+ LhRYfCQG2UaVZlmd+Tvw =bIYy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X90Rsv5I2PNxC7E066v8JrF60bpLT4PwF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Apr 7 17:30:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6AF5B089DB; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 17:30:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maxnix.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x244.google.com (mail-wm0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A7ED1E2A; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 17:30:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maxnix.bsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x244.google.com with SMTP id a140so23135965wma.2; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:30:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LE9UJBEVWLxPqgQrcgtI0CpqFJIu+lsaOAFJmRo+tl4=; b=KAAW/YViAe1+Wv92hTCwB2+8l4/+j+9UpF+/gvY5RvOgtCih5Wyf8NDOqqD49MbxWF xi1qRhBjX1TE77/Lw2ob1lxrNmc/qlGlhqAAZupwLi3EmqLC79OyTWy2RctqHKG5yH6Y fsvl+Th2Jkqq9JBh5eF0UJJm5xbTmRQtiBDpoz3UJr1R/USCfQfXIqMY3D11ZI1RQ+xs hvGKkqWctlWK2DTd3AfRD7vOKHh/7ilJTOVKeyeCzcZNZETKBFtZpnlxZYRfxhlVHJQo ROnIbmmDvb8Spb8wgKaCq/TIp/z+nBA3Ib3uXsqX6n6GcrXyN/8Z+Kq09XCDLBtdKxbi X/5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LE9UJBEVWLxPqgQrcgtI0CpqFJIu+lsaOAFJmRo+tl4=; b=mBDIcwvy07tQFc7QpEhJRveDeoOOqJQOgMxtVdTfo5MbP8+JjDvsdd/o6LTyUgc7fS jenarkpOSZ7elfD9K5woQsIhAUan1kpAb5DME0nnBQNuw1o0uT3zvlGeUwcEyIgkIjWO j67lVhlNMUt9fW9lYTg2EC8teJBebAEElI16FmWrOsPj6EvrAvCcRTRKRU3jZ0FkJDUU z9VD1mLulzmN8oQnSCGqK0Bk/oVI5LZ82ahUtGKDJkBOUTum8/uARU8F185617OJykQm U3PsYjma8o7kNujWx1GTh0G7fYFvyu1ozmUvBAHu4eIJrd2Nn9r6G8U3OreVsROPwPqm AJIg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIqvvj/ojbdL9RMWCzq3I2PWC3wVEjb6WZSEqcqzjbbIQJH1zq2Ni5Lb6fxmtmOdA== X-Received: by 10.194.189.231 with SMTP id gl7mr4796374wjc.162.1460050240849; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:30:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from max-BSD ([5.86.153.94]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jf6sm9487305wjb.2.2016.04.07.10.30.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:30:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 19:30:35 +0200 From: maxnix To: Vikash Badal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: building linux ports with x11/nvidia-driver-340 instead of x11/nvidia-driver Message-ID: <20160407193035.123cc810@max-BSD> In-Reply-To: <570668FB.1010308@where-ever.za.net> References: <570668FB.1010308@where-ever.za.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.29; i386-portbld-freebsd10.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 17:30:43 -0000 Il giorno Thu, 7 Apr 2016 16:04:43 +0200 Vikash Badal ha scritto: > Greetings > > can anyone assist ? > > I am trying to build the following ports using x11/nvidia-driver-340 > instead of x11-nvidia-driver : > emulators/linux-c6 > x11-toolkits/linux-c6-qt47-x11 > graphics/linux-c6-glx-utils > net-im/skype4 > > > Is the a knob that i can add to allow me to use the older driver ? > > Thanks > Vikash > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Look at the Freshports page for net-im/linux-c6: https://www.freshports.org/emulators/linux-c6/ In the "Configuration Options" section there is NVIDIA_GL=off: libGL support via nvidia-driver that is the default. Set this to NVIDIA_GL=on to add support with the nvidia driver. (Note: net-im/linux-c6 is a meta-port, that is a collection of many other single ports grouped together; so if you choose to compile net-im/linux-c6 with NVIDIA_GL=on, all these ports will be compiled with this option enabled). For net-im/skype4 there is no such option like this, but, apart that, the port is marked as Broken (https://www.freshports.org/faq.php#broken), so it will not compile anyway. You can use net-im/skype instead, that has the NVIDIA_GL switch too. Maxnix From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Apr 7 17:35:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55ED6B08CBD for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 17:35:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com (mail-oi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B9DA13A7; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 17:35:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id w85so107931419oiw.0; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:35:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=lCBB6LycDdjji2zBhvVMUhumxis1HkRM3trXhuozt78=; b=I+BsKkEH8ZLsIN+aCd6tjc/zOcy5d1yvxKyrTmH4VyMp33OyeHWyZkxuMJpXS+ERx0 zVfyx9eLHE4/YcwXt3kZVWBXYtR8AKnINXaktkQoNMQm4EcNKKPLZGBHKxQw3sxmDg0R /veS+BhLMrcrd499i6gOUqkwMwBWeArmTODNlwadCF78+dI5fM6TuwcYsLmUw9MMjk9S qfxQM35/p3tdt1NHqalaZqSteRJGxOOSzx9aFU/wBzjpn0RU0HQmvuQkoUgq5DY6bmSL IUQ9ch/ODeaA4DzxyIuAZ12YfBeQ0vv8qHuzkyFSjOFE37tW1ztnnfWwY2qlocfpA8F9 VbPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=lCBB6LycDdjji2zBhvVMUhumxis1HkRM3trXhuozt78=; b=UOwwfv2VFHWiyUKemGX0H4vb2CX66PUt6qxqDijg42+CpPQr3Qmt86G0VKfXayteLK teniCM+uxxW7c6FLfUKDzQPDwyT0hVJMi8aPuNB3X8uQxuc+di9Ye7ZwLz4OFvftVG9q 3ed8nFKIgPurLiAsYGGouujOzVVp7iIME0ecRCEsQa7SEhw7cgkm4MrMbo5McOBf+tUr 2PbdNg3Jou1x4XLUMoCTD6zZhqPIcz+Mo+iAErGqHsNpTIwEEwvES3WjLNqFB2NUiywe eFO+7m7LMDcMYYty8T8onw+i3ssbLpVxHAXvjFR1gBGjCLMLHoQHszlxExP3obvx7R0O p4yQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLghHc+qnZu33QjlTd3k6VJGs0qR+0RgGOuMHg6/y5qwzjA9mJdMW0yiUrUsf1KVVdBZYgsK6cn5rLicw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.157.39.193 with SMTP id c59mr2344130otb.111.1460050542352; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 10:35:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.198.18 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 10:35:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5706918A.2060502@FreeBSD.org> References: <5706918A.2060502@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:35:42 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: g-MRfhSlLeyOHG4Z9V9DYDGRXAA Message-ID: Subject: Re: AIO in 10.0-RELEASE From: Rick Miller To: Matthew Seaman Cc: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 17:35:43 -0000 On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 2016/04/07 16:25, Rick Miller wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > A user has been implementing AIO features in an application. They assert > > that, despite aio(4) stating that it is enabled either statically (with > > VFS_AIO in the kernel config) or dynamically (kldload), in their > > development environment there was no requirement for either of these > > methods of enabling AIO. My google-foo is failing me when it comes to > > FreeBSD's AIO. > > > > This question defies logic, but is it possible that AIO works by default > in > > earlier versions of 10.0 and not in more recent version of 10.0 without > any > > local system changes? > > > > You asked a pretty similar question last month, where one of the replies > pointed you to this in the UPDATING file: > > 20160301: > The AIO subsystem is now a standard part of the kernel. The > VFS_AIO kernel option and aio.ko kernel module have been removed. > Due to stability concerns, asynchronous I/O requests are only > permitted on sockets and raw disks by default. To enable > asynchronous I/O requests on all file types, set the > vfs.aio.enable_unsafe sysctl to a non-zero value. > > In fact, that change was *after* 10.3 was branched, so 10.3-RELEASE > should behave the same as 10.2 and earlier as far as AIO is concerned. > > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/releng/10.3/UPDATING?revision=297262&view=markup > > As far as I can tell from the manual, calls to aio_read(2) and similar > functions should generate an ENOSYS error code, unless your system > kernel has the aio module ceither compiled in or loaded. Which runs > counter to your user's experience. > > I suggest asking on freebsd-hackers@... as you're more likely to come to > the attention of the responsible developers there. > Thanks, Matthew...it is that UPDATING entry that caused the engineer to perform additional testing. The engineer's description of his observances during testing explicitly called out that AIO was seemingly enabled in the development environment despite not being enabled via kldload. I'm confident that AIO is not enabled in the kernel after verifying VFS_AIO was not specified in the kernel config of the compiled distribution. Thus the question...I'll check freebsd-hackers. Appreciate it. -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Apr 7 18:21:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7410BB06E48 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:21:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D94C1075 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:21:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id u206so98226798wme.1 for ; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 11:21:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=m63ZobVPoaoLflatiUzpHjxvGqP7k0wf2ANKTTqeRxc=; b=OS2iLvKJrXbur97RwigQHweplq+u6O2hQD8f3mK2coOXf2IgjxZFSsBW5T5m+VzPo2 QQ9n9oA6uYJq7qlG5ui/0Cus8Wu5x1+Cz1Vk96VcBRftFD6LMujwI08Dg7ztfDV5amT6 wVJ/LHmw9vJiZSSfJ0mGDH3yagcm3W7kVg8kF5+BHHRvveQgWQI9URZXUWv6ajK6yXB0 pD2rdgVuD/vOZ28CrMgOe+wYCfyMtNHO6fNeASFJYxp2rcoOIXPU2jz62GM97BEGyZL+ 3+bdEdzYjEAfai2l0nIw15E2JvnM71uq6nrvqtel3tQ27JPL04BllqcDCD40tBrq1C8U 6PmQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=m63ZobVPoaoLflatiUzpHjxvGqP7k0wf2ANKTTqeRxc=; b=RLA/5qW5stOOea6q4lclXbxPMkqYDosyzfYb46ikI3olqOMQAsPdrtetLm6l9LjYXb 5e9Nh/YePk6KJ3G0I+IraOzGscJN0SzMd0C031zaRYrLBvoNJDfzySiOUmJEbpKE2Zxh gYtHeEjzI/FYcW9YgEnZIGysFyNIf1cZLqWeqVkGqNBb1nvWA2eOHKQVVMakPPwitT1+ UZ4F5wtH2W0vVdVr2RMUppCZN6LUHfaK3abkoofWso5T/UP2TU1YTGDCbN0UQo2zfPb1 bdKEqeQQYxttDFTIMt49L1ZrQ0j2BvCLsVjUT7JIJTeJGO0S6+uNahEecHzWRj3oNzvF 9JVg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKfH1QEpYQIgBI4AZcx5qswDeBtsRCL9AQ4IB77FduLHN8Q180pZTo8G3oyoVoWyA== X-Received: by 10.194.238.34 with SMTP id vh2mr5655655wjc.157.1460053295496; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 11:21:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com ([90.195.213.233]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ys9sm9650814wjc.35.2016.04.07.11.21.34 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 07 Apr 2016 11:21:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 19:21:33 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: building linux ports with x11/nvidia-driver-340 instead of x11/nvidia-driver Message-ID: <20160407192133.0eee3ad0@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20160407193035.123cc810@max-BSD> References: <570668FB.1010308@where-ever.za.net> <20160407193035.123cc810@max-BSD> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2016 18:21:37 -0000 On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 19:30:35 +0200 maxnix wrote: > Il giorno Thu, 7 Apr 2016 16:04:43 +0200 > Vikash Badal ha scritto: > > > Greetings > > > > can anyone assist ? > > 340 > > I am trying to build the following ports using x11/nvidia-driver-340 > > instead of x11-nvidia-driver : > > emulators/linux-c6 > > x11-toolkits/linux-c6-qt47-x11 > > graphics/linux-c6-glx-utils > > net-im/skype4 > Look at the Freshports page for net-im/linux-c6: > https://www.freshports.org/emulators/linux-c6/ > In the "Configuration Options" section there is > NVIDIA_GL=off: libGL support via nvidia-driver > that is the default. Set this to > NVIDIA_GL=on > to add support with the nvidia driver. This makes it depend on x11/nvidia-driver, when the question as about making it depend on the x11/nvidia-driver-340 legacy driver port. As far as the port dependency installation is concerned it shouldn't make any difference NVIDIA_GL_RUN_DEPENDS=${LINUXBASE}/usr/lib/libGL.so.1:x11/nvidia-driver so if x11/nvidia-driver-340 has already installed libGL.so.1 then it wont try to install x11/nvidia-driver to satisfy the dependency. This used to work with pkg-tools, I'm not sure what happens with pkg. It'll probably complain, but it's worth a try. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 8 06:03:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1A7B0807B for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 06:03:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from afiskon@devzen.ru) Received: from relay11.nicmail.ru (relay11.nicmail.ru [195.208.3.7]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2411C13D3 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 06:03:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from afiskon@devzen.ru) Received: from [109.70.25.214] (port=41859 helo=fujitsu) by f06.mail.nic.ru with esmtp (Exim 5.55) (envelope-from ) id 1aoP6N-0009dO-2s; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 08:37:03 +0300 Received: from [188.123.231.37] (account afiskon@devzen.ru HELO fujitsu) by proxy01.mail.nic.ru (Exim 5.55) with id 1aoP68-00076K-Nt; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 08:36:48 +0300 Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 08:36:14 +0300 From: Aleksander Alekseev To: Gary Aitken Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: llvm37 build failure, libatomic? Message-ID: <20160408083614.5af4c89e@fujitsu> In-Reply-To: <57067324.8070603@dreamchaser.org> References: <57067324.8070603@dreamchaser.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 06:03:42 -0000 Hello, Gary > Updated ports (it's been quite a while) and attempting to rebuild x11 > fails for llvm37 claiming the compiler needs libatomic and it's not > there. What's the deal with libatomic? I've just checked: ``` cd /usr/ports sudo portsnap fetch update cd devel/llvm37 sudo make -DBATCH reinstall ``` Everything seems to work. Its 10.2 with following /etc/make.conf: ``` CC=/usr/local/bin/clang38 CXX=/usr/local/bin/clang++38 CPP=/usr/local/bin/clang-cpp38 CPUTYPE?=native CFLAGS+=-O2 -pipe -g CXXFLAGS+=-O2 -pipe -g ``` .. and default port flags. I hope it will help you a little bit. Also try to upgrade LLVM using `pkg` and/or just install libatomic_ops. Its available both as a port and as a package. I personally don't have it in my system though. If you still have a problem with libatomic could you please provide more information - OS version, make.conf, port flags, more logs, etc? -- Best regards, Aleksander Alekseev http://eax.me/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 8 07:18:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7F6B077C4 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:18:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.165]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C596113D for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:18:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from [212.54.34.118] (helo=smtp10.mnd.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aoQgN-000225-1W; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 09:18:19 +0200 Received: from 5419839c.cm-5-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([84.25.131.156] helo=ra.boosten.org) by smtp10.mnd.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aoQgM-0002IG-VJ; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 09:18:19 +0200 Received: from ra.egypt.nl (localhost.egypt.nl [127.0.0.1]) by ra.boosten.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5600C39849; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:18:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at boosten.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=x tagged_above=-999 required=6.9 WHITELISTED tests=[] autolearn=unavailable Received: from ra.boosten.org ([127.0.0.1]) by ra.egypt.nl (ra.egypt.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hDXTRqtOR9oA; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:18:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www.boosten.org (ramses.boosten.org [192.168.13.8]) by ra.boosten.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8832A3983E; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:18:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 165.225.72.126 (SquirrelMail authenticated user peter@boosten.org) by www.boosten.org with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:17:51 +0200 Message-ID: <45cd82104da647966f08658db0b8fa19.squirrel@www.boosten.org> In-Reply-To: <20160408083614.5af4c89e@fujitsu> References: <57067324.8070603@dreamchaser.org> <20160408083614.5af4c89e@fujitsu> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:17:51 +0200 Subject: Re: llvm37 build failure, libatomic? From: "Peter Boosten" To: "Aleksander Alekseev" Cc: "Gary Aitken" , "FreeBSD Mailing List" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.23 [SVN] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Ziggo-spambar: / X-Ziggo-spamscore: 0.0 X-Ziggo-spamreport: CMAE Analysis: v=2.1 cv=GMr1ab5K c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=kziv93cY1bsA:10 a=nOV1aKkKJHuxSHXdqqEA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=DFdl2uiir_oA:10 xcat=Undefined/Undefined none X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 07:18:36 -0000 On Fri, April 8, 2016 07:36, Aleksander Alekseev wrote: > Hello, Gary > >> Updated ports (it's been quite a while) and attempting to rebuild x11 >> fails for llvm37 claiming the compiler needs libatomic and it's not >> there. What's the deal with libatomic? > You will need to install lang/clang-devel to successfully update llvm37. At least, that worked for me. Peter From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 8 07:22:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17AC8B07A7F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:22:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vikash.badal@is.co.za) Received: from za-smtp-delivery-156.mimecast.co.za (za-smtp-delivery-156.mimecast.co.za [41.74.205.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.mimecast.co.za", Issuer "Symantec Class 3 Secure Server CA - G4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E2DF1465 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:22:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vikash.badal@is.co.za) Received: from grumpy.is.co.za (grumpy.is.co.za [196.35.45.228]) (Using TLS) by za-smtp-1.mimecast.co.za with ESMTP id za-mta-21-M0H41HQyT-W2ZUh4qu94QQ-1; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 09:15:39 +0200 Received: from [196.14.169.131] (port=16520 helo=zabrysvisexhub4.af.didata.local) by grumpy.is.co.za with esmtps (Cipher TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Internet Solutions MTA) (envelope-from ) id 1aoQdk-00046T-2t; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 09:15:38 +0200 Received: from ZABRYSVISEXMBX6.af.didata.local ([fe80::7cac:3c86:5c53:2e65]) by zabrysvisexhub4.af.didata.local ([fe80::481e:fd56:2c33:836b%11]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:09:23 +0200 From: Vikash Badal To: RW , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: building linux ports with x11/nvidia-driver-340 instead of x11/nvidia-driver Thread-Topic: building linux ports with x11/nvidia-driver-340 instead of x11/nvidia-driver Thread-Index: AQHRkNq+gz4Ou8Z+t0WTKbdzqCYaf59+oyaAgAAOPYCAANaEAA== Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 07:09:23 +0000 Message-ID: <57075920.7030707@is.co.za> References: <570668FB.1010308@where-ever.za.net> <20160407193035.123cc810@max-BSD> <20160407192133.0eee3ad0@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20160407192133.0eee3ad0@gumby.homeunix.com> Accept-Language: en-ZA, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 x-originating-ip: [196.38.242.39] Content-ID: <07D8248F3BDBF64E83D375EB1617789A@za.didata.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: e1d3b38935d620489df496c06f971026 X-MC-Unique: M0H41HQyT-W2ZUh4qu94QQ-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 07:22:20 -0000 On 07/04/2016 20:21, RW via freebsd-questions wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 19:30:35 +0200 > maxnix wrote: >=20 > This makes it depend on x11/nvidia-driver, when the question as about > making it depend on the x11/nvidia-driver-340 legacy driver port. >=20 >=20 > As far as the port dependency installation is concerned it shouldn't > make any difference >=20 > NVIDIA_GL_RUN_DEPENDS=3D${LINUXBASE}/usr/lib/libGL.so.1:x11/nvidia-driver >=20 > so if x11/nvidia-driver-340 has already installed libGL.so.1 then it > wont try to install x11/nvidia-driver to satisfy the dependency.=20 >=20 > This used to work with pkg-tools, I'm not sure what happens with > pkg. It'll probably complain, but it's worth a try. Sorry I forgot to mention that I'm building via poudriere From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 8 09:10:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CDDB0800F for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:10:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdm7dv@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x22e.google.com (mail-io0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1C5E14AA for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:10:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdm7dv@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id o126so102533736iod.0 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 02:10:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=gydGXeosFkFka28OhFwglSwx+YHROg0Vie4X1j2KiOc=; b=miYAeMyZ7pZXzBk0eEdeP3JeVKqeXFVGNu0BUKQld4C77yaejzFXqUdVt88NTxOxAE iqswtyOPUBjpLd/qT+hDEhmxE1NtgsWVTU1mVx54sVvGzXt0MEuzbPpwd8Hzffn2kyD3 o2fgzuWc3kkYbHNAcqWbS3vnpmM0ag1H3dL1GCZigMBpJ+cH1nDaDDl+s59dKyJ4Zt9u 1If+V1di0Pj17RQBQKNtgwLT6aGSIgkXWuZzYRy1afKl66+RgIT2A92Ht/6DEfTXK4li SRFvJDYPiruPPptX50kVeHizSaMtt52jPFpM1TdiRZryZmswVe0xY8jUD+j8KmMw2NTg c0lA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=gydGXeosFkFka28OhFwglSwx+YHROg0Vie4X1j2KiOc=; b=bYETzvW/cFQjIdpk8MCMI4Otmzbhe40XO3XvLXM27IcrKXtiE4iOi5a6SFdywyLgdc yADK1HPHq7/AZkpnznFV0s6rRetPVx6Y+8hc59jmO0BZU3w7l7waB8yAvCBXEUmdETlb NUBCZ/u3vqVkAg6uio9He6JraML0Tq70Mxneas054GoK++r2uZkGpFy2JlIvwv9CDwDs lF04zZfbSoWkqQZkPfrH2px1Uyf5F+Gc6E3h2q07egCzhw8xUuGTONI1MPv0NJNj4Jst hFjzDWhGN/9+mcZZbR0zxCQjlykf9p9LlEHEHcGKcRbQLsGr4R+jPy0kZ3NoRilw6NDt AWOA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLg/xsWwDQBfVq5fmIjIufFGJ6gky9i+n5uPNmxiwd1N6UozI7I37jSuuRMGuQ+WhIFRJNox+EBdGRM9A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.137.72 with SMTP id l69mr8141596iod.177.1460106627043; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 02:10:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.22.66 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 02:10:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 05:10:27 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: REL 10.3 has no md5 checksum From: Jonathan Moore To: luzar722@gmail.com, FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 09:10:28 -0000 Hi, Have you tried just to upgrade? with "freebsd-upgrade"? https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/updating-upgrading.html Hope this helps, Jonathan Moore From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 8 12:50:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDDCB081B7; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 12:50:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x236.google.com (mail-ig0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55835110F; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 12:50:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-x236.google.com with SMTP id f1so12262936igr.1; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 05:50:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-transfer-encoding; bh=loGC5BPv+roKA0EDbA0JO1B0WsJXkNxmnIqBU5BQTfc=; b=TgUwQGVrs2RBm8uH9WFuSGoheB3WAdCgG7EWszgX5j9Izr3f3POS7i06MeQ8SsWvEe 1s0iJVD3aa31Zzua45DMp/Nf3EjwIM55S5HoORJVRjkRlUE5dn0TGpmT3P1ynrDzxokE pmCp443tJdqbl/PXY7PO0S7MrkbhBFEbq3gfwsjrYYViGk/5Pd5dLkiB/IN1IG+bIakQ 7QLCxc0ULwul4QgtOr1dmD4FTNOFSHDebOxBSgkzCkLQlJZ1gaayv4y/Ib5+QNt2u7iz wMoJacghY0T8EUDHEZf5G87jL66ab7ymdUXsAIB8NTUNkKzrKY6LIuihLLmr8iQPazCH RxGQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:content-transfer-encoding; bh=loGC5BPv+roKA0EDbA0JO1B0WsJXkNxmnIqBU5BQTfc=; b=gFgH5SgDRPT1VEoSwS/MXa0urtumruiLFFy0WOiZFYZrC3COwI3ADZTRzssQrwTeqh PM8nDbkLWgjOg1KkknKOPxiAfoBmcY7sf1eaaL3cMQNXkmXNR/PXeXQxmUVrx4L9deYC QCcQkrgwxPHtS2MzWc3mAhb4rCpzMeMrfT1tMfR2HjApa9aaqtSE+4+R9OWx/9IW3tKd HltdP+okKqhyHolE+/aALYH8ET5QCKgpCwtdeJz4v5A0B0IgwUuoBZGHszpLHXla76he KbxOxdcI+3yunzeSK4NK6+Wp7qLYwk4agZJyXWc7Ny046F9FdS6vCgkf3cUox6hUX9RJ UEWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLx+CAzev6IcGHoL73p58yjKe6/uc2wx1hWJjm6ZVHabJ4BNW5fflEXzK5BelZLTQ== X-Received: by 10.50.66.132 with SMTP id f4mr3403583igt.83.1460119820350; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 05:50:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.10.3] (cpe-76-190-244-6.neo.res.rr.com. [76.190.244.6]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 73sm6109635ioq.16.2016.04.08.05.50.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 08 Apr 2016 05:50:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5707A90D.2040808@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 08:50:21 -0400 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Freebsd Questions , "ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: ports long description error Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 12:50:21 -0000 Was reviewing ports here https://www.freebsd.org/ports/multimedia.html and many of the "Long description" links generated the following error. An Exception Has Occurred An illegal value was provided for the "revision" parameter. HTTP Response Status 400 Bad Request Think someone should take a look into this matter. cx88 ffmpegthumbnailer-2.0.9_1 emby From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 8 14:31:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F50B071CC for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 14:31:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsduser@cloudzeeland.nl) Received: from ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (cloudzeeland.xs4all.nl [83.161.133.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cloudzeeland.nl", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAB5515C9 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 14:31:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsduser@cloudzeeland.nl) Received: from ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (ceto.cloudzeeland.nl [10.10.10.30]) by ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id A713547B7897 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:31:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.10.10.34] (aegis.cloudzeeland.nl [82.176.127.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7CF1447B7896 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:31:11 +0200 (CEST) From: JosC Subject: BSD Hardware To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Message-ID: <5707C0B3.5080506@cloudzeeland.nl> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:31:15 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on ceto.cloudzeeland.nl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:31:22 -0000 I am looking for a reliable replacement of my current BSD server. Could someone tell me which mini business pc would fit? NoSSD, but plain vanilla SATA 2,5 or 3,5 WD Red. Thanks, Jos Chrispijn From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 8 15:02:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA79B07D0C for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 15:02:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84D301325 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 15:02:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from zero-gravitas.local (unknown [85.199.232.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A120110C2 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 15:02:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/9A120110C2; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: BSD Hardware To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5707C0B3.5080506@cloudzeeland.nl> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <5707C804.30301@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:02:28 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5707C0B3.5080506@cloudzeeland.nl> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="od8ij3mBOLstcCDaBFMokPnoMHxsRMl2c" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.1 at smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 15:02:23 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --od8ij3mBOLstcCDaBFMokPnoMHxsRMl2c Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="nFBVMkaTTpqo01KmnXgx8mjnOjFwbRHKI" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <5707C804.30301@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: BSD Hardware References: <5707C0B3.5080506@cloudzeeland.nl> In-Reply-To: <5707C0B3.5080506@cloudzeeland.nl> --nFBVMkaTTpqo01KmnXgx8mjnOjFwbRHKI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2016/04/08 15:31, JosC wrote: > I am looking for a reliable replacement of my current BSD server. > Could someone tell me which mini business pc would fit? NoSSD, but plai= n > vanilla SATA 2,5 or 3,5 WD Red. Most server- or desktop- class machines will work fine with FreeBSD. Machines from big name manufacturers like Dell are well supported, or for smaller suppliers, you can generally compare their list of components against devices known to be supported by FreeBSD. Small suppliers are generally receptive if you tell them that you need a machine to run FreeBSD, and might even be prepared to plug in a USB stick and boot up a live system image to confirm everything works. The type of hard drive you use is in fact just about the *least* likely thing to result in compatibility problems. You want to worry more about things like RAID controllers/ HBAs (Host Bus Adapter), Network cards and on-board chipsets. You'll have to be rather more specific about your requirements if you want any more concrete suggestions: what services is this machine expected to provide, in support of how many users? How much disk space do you need? Are you going to have any unusual requirements, like you need to transcode video streams or compile quantities of source code? Are you intending to use ZFS? If so, then you'll need to spec more memory than otherwise but you can use a pretty bare bones HBA rather than a full-featured RAID controller, which would probably save you a bit of money overall. Beware though of some types of RAID controllers which don't provide a 'JBOD' or pass-through mode: ZFS works best when it has full control over the hard drives. Oh, while I'm here: don't dismiss SSDs out of hand. They've really come of age over the last 18 months or so. Good quality SSDs (eg. Intel or Samsung) nowadays have a longer MTBF than spinny disks. A lot of the price differential is down to whether the SSD has a supercap (in order to be able to complete any pending writes should your system lose power unexpectedly), so assuming you can cope with the potential missed filesystem writes they needn't cost you a great deal more. Plus, of course, they are that much faster than rotating media. Cheers, Matthew --nFBVMkaTTpqo01KmnXgx8mjnOjFwbRHKI-- --od8ij3mBOLstcCDaBFMokPnoMHxsRMl2c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXB8gKXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTntIcP/0lsKWqnfPgbv1iHHYCzYQK+ UYcyzHq2Id88QmdEbrb4WgXyHoFKHqBWwZt/LEAA5+9uELJ8FX0gM7llyuNOl9ey KR4IWaXGANeT6MEjg0TA5PNWTLqNKd6YbbfRl8mWKb/IVr3Ou7Knyo3V1nnF30qu ly4MEhJTXPpd+ikc50jdlHOPZ4UlnEMIsity16ngCvPylNZoeUJPdRFqN3v5a/DC qVnABSPLFBpMl1LAnKho2sT7rBJTDh9l/7z6MuFR0aGANlWvQ3bOE6BhITdbXxoN A1tDtihq0gGFWal2o/NW0RArxAYP1DrSgxi/qclCSsH3mTdbzLbf/ZuMUQNJk7Ao D9MH90dzSoNnu7IyQWYnEL8i8FzZu/0Fvf1T6qaQSNYi333GDDrn/d1v+IxTTZSj 1ac//uIj+DY745VhL6vgWv0FQf4MEXas8mdp+RzLnSWlndmPLM/ej6+7lq0o59Ur 3Nmej6cBsy0zUwzx86Z7tKrJWLap9GBxE6ZppwhXPwxNA7QrRxUoEFhSs6RLLx3+ oE3/+q6sqSZVnoezXSDCvUZ8gLUSe8vbVUC7pbvUG8HnoqKo1HRjZlJp3lwRGQtw 1eKMHLl0E9G/bxnMdnY53+mK/C9BoyUSQTN/4A8DOQMceom1oCQ9QkhBSUEmPOSS 1LdV4aoiVPMKOjT2ESNR =MMT5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --od8ij3mBOLstcCDaBFMokPnoMHxsRMl2c-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 8 15:07:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB1FB080AA for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 15:07:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF0FA1706 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 15:07:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id n3so26336337wmn.0 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 08:07:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/rDDC13MWS/7P6bH3kpvurJzkdcdi12soY92ybvSl9I=; b=C6hetcu6soH7WhzyygWoGvMNcvEM+Ndw2EU4NvU1BBfMCy/RlY6M8oUOkh4WgB6yop kEaSpE/OR8rtQlrHAASVC1S2qN4EKOpgPVAEYn0se7wKPfQNnlrSQA4d/iGGcdqleiw4 fxiEZWh9vECLhAdZ4XY4O17Hva5BMtyp1XZDP9ZT9Y/+WCf3AEWTWDyX7oN/sRIhy3Gt fziHb3ny3z5mQzh8pIGj9ov323+wTgVkUG7bSXoNrcnKDE/L47xa3thCG4CUTUDvqLbX 6bRtCtUi3sPgrVI0GcEas9BRaxsEDJt8S+NSNfonhoJp/NjEEpIBMzsfcSy+yAYugwQA 6f2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/rDDC13MWS/7P6bH3kpvurJzkdcdi12soY92ybvSl9I=; b=hMS9d94sfoKkfEYJ5Jfl/QN6h7Jj1p9CLGxvHvLoYTEjOs3tQNh3XDz+nqsohx/bKr tjdftR2XYqz7BhtFlpXMZYcjn54oQBtf435seq3mi8WcUR0l6KnXtX19oKo4ZV8l3kij CFuZKqdG34Zum2a7HNGl0yqy7mkK796RVVf99C0RYZgzU1o+REVux/YnDZUrkveY+8mU 6rQGRsFkD3XzNnkvcVpcK8O+7/jpWCoefVz5B141+cyHvkGn86582nP5bugxgOPTxACb kXjr2wUCgYjbXYd63wBsbs+HvtCNerQe3zlkNs/7beiDxfdkMvL09W+rvJwv8mBWQWaP QEMA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJK8zA/uCtFyG+XQLbeyziagVFSXh6Jgh19XQGrWGKKYDdW/YL7C7g8zyUJr9HazWhqium9Amg9fTJzBJw== X-Received: by 10.28.73.66 with SMTP id w63mr4517821wma.53.1460128040351; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 08:07:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.103.233 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 08:06:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5707C693.5060009@cloudzeeland.nl> References: <5707C0B3.5080506@cloudzeeland.nl> <5707C693.5060009@cloudzeeland.nl> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 18:06:40 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BSD Hardware To: JosC Cc: User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 15:07:22 -0000 Oh, I missed the 'mini' part. Sorry for that. If you head to pfsense.org, their hardware sections, I am sure you can find one which you can bump storage for, even RAM. Something like https://store.pfsense.org/SG-4860/ pfSense is FreeBSD so you can actually install FreeBSD on that hardware. On 8 April 2016 at 17:56, JosC wrote: > Thanks - that was in first my option too but it is not really a mini > > In een bericht van 8-4-2016 16:53: > > HP Z230. > > > -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft." From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 8 15:14:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148F2B0846C for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 15:14:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (ns.dreamchaser.org [66.109.141.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4AF31F91 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 15:14:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [192.168.151.122]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id u38FDjRg091447; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:13:45 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Subject: Re: llvm37 build failure, libatomic? References: <57067324.8070603@dreamchaser.org> <20160408083614.5af4c89e@fujitsu> To: Aleksander Alekseev Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List From: Gary Aitken X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <5707CA5C.7060902@dreamchaser.org> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:12:28 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160408083614.5af4c89e@fujitsu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [192.168.151.101]); Fri, 08 Apr 2016 09:13:46 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 15:14:09 -0000 Hello Aleksander and Peter, Thanks for your replies. >>> Updated ports (it's been quite a while) and attempting to rebuild x11 >>> fails for llvm37 claiming the compiler needs libatomic and it's not >>> there. What's the deal with libatomic? > > You will need to install lang/clang-devel to successfully update llvm37. When I try to install clang-devel I get the same error: -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB -- Performing Test HAVE_CXX_ATOMICS_WITHOUT_LIB - Failed -- Looking for __atomic_fetch_add_4 in atomic -- Looking for __atomic_fetch_add_4 in atomic - not found CMake Error at cmake/modules/CheckAtomic.cmake:36 (message): Host compiler appears to require libatomic, but cannot find it. Call Stack (most recent call first): cmake/config-ix.cmake:296 (include) CMakeLists.txt:412 (include) > If you still have a problem with libatomic could you please provide > more information - OS version, make.conf, port flags, more logs, etc? The CMakeError.log file indicates a number of errors: Run Build Command:"/usr/local/bin/ninja" "cmTC_32962" [1/2] Building C object CMakeFiles/cmTC_32962.dir/CheckIncludeFile.c.o FAILED: /usr/local/bin/gcc48 -O2 -pipe -isystem /usr/local/include -fstack-protector -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc48 -fno-strict- aliasing -o CMakeFiles/cmTC_32962.dir/CheckIncludeFile.c.o -c CheckIncludeFile.c In file included from CheckIncludeFile.c:1:0: /usr/include/malloc.h:3:2: error: #error " has been replaced by " #error " has been replaced by " ^ ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed. and others, ending with: /usr/local/bin/ld: cannot find -lcxxrt collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status I'm guessing this is a configuration error on my system, probably related to 10.x changes; I'm running 9.2-RELEASE-p12 /etc/make.conf contains: PERL_VERSION=5.20.3_9 DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=perl5=5.20.3_9 WITH_PKGNG=yes WITH_BDB_VER=5 OPTIONS_SET=X11 OPTIONS_UNSET=NLS WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes When I first saw the error I installed devel/libatomic_ops, but that creates /usr/local/lib/libatomic_ops.a and libatomic_ops_gpl.a. Not libatomic.* There is also a libboost_atomic.* set from about 6 months ago. However, given the other errors above from ninja I'm guessing this is more than just a libatomic problem. Thanks for any additional clues, Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 8 15:18:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85503B08619 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 15:18:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andipersti@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E02610EF for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 15:18:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andipersti@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id l6so68767690wml.1 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 08:18:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=71aIsxOyCTtknOc8aWSWl00gsQMJAvNwx50AkfZULvU=; b=AEJ6ILUrTYVJp082G+W8VGzpFRLOgvMIg5dYHP1yON2fW1vrfUZACdWlsZMzJgjYi6 GJUmYaUw3XcnnQ9Xwbl0lodeJlh3lIUk2JCEmIV+R5thfi+V5UVSMmc1MKQ6M3GdmAM/ rIDgv+QgKFmaSKUiv6gIiFuBnAYAxjGtFYdP/P8Kpnf1HKhptTMVLmu8k3fViyE2ULCd /BZ22TA3FgO4yEvpTjDs6aJcRN8ZMbu4kwCq6G47m7tEpG8VMBW4fkQl5AkIFFdg2Fy8 QgoEC6kOw7EEubfm2jrTLTu3cvW8h8j8oCe9AhhishwsKLyakFWmYlua08F71VmY4ZZg nqjw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=71aIsxOyCTtknOc8aWSWl00gsQMJAvNwx50AkfZULvU=; b=D+tn6UcTioH9V2WQE6+qS+xy+CJvs6SmH1wV/NVI0jzgoW59Cs5cUS7PrdaOmoskRp A9H3Vp4SChm6LOaC0c+oe5J/UidOEUf9BznvMEJZ4MJocmH9g/usPFaAJUED31sK6dMA eS1icR9CaqsicAWpZvOr9YG55ZP+fP/TwCAyfW8iFIA6CFtnU1C1Ppt/WMLkQBldZUW9 cZkjMUEw+/N/hu6NBzExSlgaA2pOAuWYvdA3ViC6ItozuuH7bd2h+wDreiGKpTZXkL9O 2oVaWqQQtNXyA5fRGYS7Ymk3ayz0QN8XDN/layLMs/aDqpx1trneJAmRqTg8ApFQw5Zv JXqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKZijbO8KEop4qd7+J2KM1JSf4fCsire+4TAyO5wBsvHrlwflW5ejBbfihvWlsJUw== X-Received: by 10.194.115.8 with SMTP id jk8mr10208551wjb.142.1460128731663; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 08:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.25] (91-119-227-85.dynamic.xdsl-line.inode.at. [91.119.227.85]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u145sm3492706wmu.17.2016.04.08.08.18.50 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 08 Apr 2016 08:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: ports long description error To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5707A90D.2040808@gmail.com> From: Andreas Perstinger Message-ID: <5707CBDA.8020706@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 17:18:50 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5707A90D.2040808@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 15:18:53 -0000 On 2016-04-08 14:50, Ernie Luzar wrote: > Was reviewing ports here https://www.freebsd.org/ports/multimedia.html > and many of the "Long description" links generated the following error. > > > > An Exception Has Occurred > > An illegal value was provided for the "revision" parameter. > HTTP Response Status > > 400 Bad Request There exists already an open bug report for this problem: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206709 In the meantime, you need to manually remove everything after the first "HEAD" in the link for the long description. Bye, Andreas From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 8 18:23:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F3BB08366 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 18:23:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D611CAA for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 18:23:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A48D3ADFA for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 11:23:38 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Fonts for vt(4) driver? Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 11:23:38 -0700 Message-ID: <55065.1460139818@server1.tristatelogic.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 18:23:39 -0000 I'm installing a 10.3-RELEASE system from scratch. When installing a new system (that I'm not already familiar with) from scratch, I find that it is Best to consult the Handbook. The Handbook (Sec 5.4.3) suggests switching to the vt(4) console driver (to avoid problems when exiting X) by placing the following line in /boot/loader.conf: kern.vty=vt I did that, but now the font being used for all console messages appears to me to be very... um... weird. It's all, like double-wide or something. I don't like it at all. How can I get vt(4) to use the same font as was formerly used (by sc(4)?) on my old 9.X system? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 8 19:11:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E47B0807E for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 19:11:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vulpes.vvelox.net (vulpes.vvelox.net [96.95.67.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC501015 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 19:11:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.vulpes.vvelox.net (vixen42.vulpes.vvelox.net [192.168.15.2]) (Authenticated sender: kitsune) by vulpes.vvelox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 06B67377D827; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 14:10:46 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 14:11:43 -0500 From: "Zane C. B-H." To: JosC Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: BSD Hardware Message-ID: <20160408141143.25c54d9a@vixen42.vulpes.vvelox.net> In-Reply-To: <5707C0B3.5080506@cloudzeeland.nl> References: <5707C0B3.5080506@cloudzeeland.nl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 19:11:50 -0000 On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:31:15 +0200 JosC wrote: > I am looking for a reliable replacement of my current BSD server. > Could someone tell me which mini business pc would fit? NoSSD, but > plain vanilla SATA 2,5 or 3,5 WD Red. I would look into the Supermicro Atom boards, if you are not doing anything CPU bound. Power efficient and you can get them with IPMI. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 8 19:59:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D65EB09220 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 19:59:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sebastian@wolfgarten.com) Received: from waldfest.wolfgarten.com (waldfest.wolfgarten.com [144.76.61.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A601A45 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 19:59:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sebastian@wolfgarten.com) Received: from waldfest (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by waldfest.wolfgarten.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E3F27A3D for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 21:53:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at wolfgarten.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.89 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.89 tagged_above=-9999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, BODY_RULE_1=1, T_FILL_THIS_FORM_SHORT=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from waldfest.wolfgarten.com ([127.0.0.1]) by waldfest (waldfest.wolfgarten.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id nHURg6Gawftf for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 21:53:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.159] (unknown [5.146.100.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by waldfest.wolfgarten.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 00F0C27A35 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 21:53:52 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=wolfgarten.com; s=mail; t=1460145233; bh=dSUfceAYGN65AXqbR/rtzjZP7wrp6UEq2vnSkKK7CgI=; h=From:Subject:Date:To; b=K+hak1wOVyh160nqMVimLqHigzGED22tXTmhebeQfpGPts7jevcQwVBy/Ydx3tECu DnACOOiDTxj5xyzfS6Mfc/ZH5pP2Z8KLDYsJ29FFNnBmmpqoJdWT+4PpOHm5N04aah vsCZyZI41ueOxpwkn5Xy+J06griGeUfMxvcJ9uU0= From: Sebastian Wolfgarten Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Zfs - broken disk - add instead of attach - How to go back to mirrored setup? Message-Id: <6ACA8DAA-7D86-4FD0-B08C-2030CFF575C1@wolfgarten.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 21:53:52 +0200 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 19:59:44 -0000 Dear all, I used to have a ZFS-based mirror and now thanks to a typo I have one = big disk of 5.4TB instead of a 2.7T mirror - how do I get back to having = a mirror? Here is what happened: Last week one of my hard drives broke requiring me to detach & replace = the disk: server1 - ZFS pool - HEALTH fault=20 NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE FRAG EXPANDSZ CAP DEDUP HEALTH = ALTROOT zroot 2.72T 763G 1.97T 18% - 27% 1.00x DEGRADED -=20= pool: zroot state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has been removed by the administrator. Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning in a degraded state. action: Online the device using 'zpool online' or replace the device = with 'zpool replace'. scan: scrub repaired 0 in 3h48m with 0 errors on Fri Mar 25 10:48:35 = 2016 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM zroot DEGRADED 0 0 0 mirror-0 DEGRADED 0 0 0 5383010007106655398 REMOVED 0 0 0 was /dev/diskid/DISK-Z1F0LSM7p3 gpt/zfs1 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors # zpool detach zroot /dev/diskid/DISK-Z1F0LSM7p3 After the provider put in a new disk, I made a mistake (i.e. I added the = disk to the zroot pool instead of attaching it) and now I was wondering = how to recover from this situation: # zpool add zroot ada0 Here is what zroot now looks like: # zpool status zroot pool: zroot state: ONLINE scan: scrub canceled on Fri Apr 8 21:27:31 2016 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM zroot ONLINE 0 0 0 gpt/zfs1 ONLINE 0 0 0 ada0 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors I tried to remove/disable/offline the second disk but that did not work: # zpool offline zroot ada0 cannot offline ada0: no valid replicas # zpool remove zroot ada0 cannot remove ada0: only inactive hot spares, cache, top-level, or log = devices can be removed # zpool detach zroot ada0 cannot detach ada0: only applicable to mirror and replacing vdevs Now my question is: How can I get back to having a mirror without = loosing all the data on ada1? Any ideas? Using ZFS split maybe? Many thanks. Best regards Sebastian From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 8 20:08:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A60EB0947D for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 20:08:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vsasjason@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com (mail-wm0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A3A71DD3 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 20:08:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vsasjason@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id l6so77189559wml.1 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:08:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=UdSkjH43riPXmlMFkWJB4rsYrw9rN1pit1kJCziHyP8=; b=U6WRpQlYrikciB2yVdScH9ebgRDOTmW+pqMYBY2NEhP1Z1SNLCFWCt1sUw9kwotPdS dphW/lFDGcXQMPDdm5uFoEfHys82OiI+BJqQs/Vo+Twz/z/wTP0DljpQwd3Qo6ByOjLu yGJuqzrlqb1tot7Mq07ChjRqj0GRswc0Y2GsUy0LC7eQyFlz/EL+S/racCTMcNo75kyK MLmSsSxAb/Rp7aEiAiYCg61N5oBG+ZXoSn7eZZ6sQy+ofvBLWTASG4lrLvcSEG3cFZ6r kwQtu9TJxxhMjWoo0K1DoIUrkd7lr225A9V84RPXTQWXhXn/Yn+2FT8n3QnLDo4rf3FT i9kw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=UdSkjH43riPXmlMFkWJB4rsYrw9rN1pit1kJCziHyP8=; b=ILujnsgpOerudvq4LmVTHbcsBcsJgeOjdTt1C9p7lzGUV2NfmnpA2BGvFqH27Zxk08 fUL0bxlIeULf/RBsdFTx7UT6WdpTnPehnfdgiMxlEgm33CE75XXr2g4veD9AQaD0UKl2 BXcRilRhZ+j6d+6iPdWrZM6/xlTQmKIS1Vvv3SiEKfkmaDxnS+vqnrlqrLK28ezeZkmI ZS/fY6+fiX8sjCyrHTYmjBGXedIlrB6KEcbL64vJHDwvhc06XND+oZPwOCLYrkd0rCSD ixUIRIzOX/NNmXuLzCisI9FmXkB1h42zQ9enCUf496rt787M44Zl0yc79hWpv3xx5pr3 mrbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLJtfpY2C6UQY7T7hkG0fQHXzHC3QcZRn7/NgyuhNIXbpofgHF0l8dKd1fZg3pHp/iS9ZyyR30rYsg4Ug== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.28.92.13 with SMTP id q13mr5464963wmb.43.1460146132558; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 13:08:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.246.73 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 13:08:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.246.73 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 13:08:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <6ACA8DAA-7D86-4FD0-B08C-2030CFF575C1@wolfgarten.com> Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 23:08:52 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Zfs - broken disk - add instead of attach - How to go back to mirrored setup? From: Anton Sayetsky To: Sebastian Wolfgarten Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 20:08:54 -0000 8 =D0=B0=D0=BF=D1=80. 2016 =D0=B3. 22:59 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=B7=D0= =BE=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8C "Sebastian Wolfgarten" < sebastian@wolfgarten.com> =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB: > > Dear all, > > I used to have a ZFS-based mirror and now thanks to a typo I have one big disk of 5.4TB instead of a 2.7T mirror - how do I get back to having a mirror? > > Here is what happened: > > Last week one of my hard drives broke requiring me to detach & replace the disk: > > server1 - ZFS pool - HEALTH fault > > NAME SIZE ALLOC FREE FRAG EXPANDSZ CAP DEDUP HEALTH ALTROO= T > zroot 2.72T 763G 1.97T 18% - 27% 1.00x DEGRADED - > > pool: zroot > state: DEGRADED > status: One or more devices has been removed by the administrator. > Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning in a > degraded state. > action: Online the device using 'zpool online' or replace the device with > 'zpool replace'. > scan: scrub repaired 0 in 3h48m with 0 errors on Fri Mar 25 10:48:35 2016 > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > zroot DEGRADED 0 0 0 > mirror-0 DEGRADED 0 0 0 > 5383010007106655398 REMOVED 0 0 0 was > /dev/diskid/DISK-Z1F0LSM7p3 > gpt/zfs1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > errors: No known data errors > > # zpool detach zroot /dev/diskid/DISK-Z1F0LSM7p3 > > After the provider put in a new disk, I made a mistake (i.e. I added the disk to the zroot pool instead of attaching it) and now I was wondering how to recover from this situation: > > # zpool add zroot ada0 > > Here is what zroot now looks like: > > # zpool status zroot > pool: zroot > state: ONLINE > scan: scrub canceled on Fri Apr 8 21:27:31 2016 > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > zroot ONLINE 0 0 0 > gpt/zfs1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > ada0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > errors: No known data errors > > I tried to remove/disable/offline the second disk but that did not work: > > # zpool offline zroot ada0 > cannot offline ada0: no valid replicas > # zpool remove zroot ada0 > cannot remove ada0: only inactive hot spares, cache, top-level, or log devices can be removed > # zpool detach zroot ada0 > cannot detach ada0: only applicable to mirror and replacing vdevs > > Now my question is: How can I get back to having a mirror without loosing all the data on ada1? Any ideas? Using ZFS split maybe? Unfortunately, it's impossible. You must backup pool data and recreate it. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Apr 8 21:37:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15E0B07F25 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 21:37:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from outgoing.tristatelogic.com (segfault.tristatelogic.com [69.62.255.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E8F19C8 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 21:37:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfg@tristatelogic.com) Received: from segfault-nmh-helo.tristatelogic.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by segfault.tristatelogic.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F9D3ADFA for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 14:37:49 -0700 (PDT) From: "Ronald F. Guilmette" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fonts for vt(4) driver? In-Reply-To: <55065.1460139818@server1.tristatelogic.com> Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 14:37:49 -0700 Message-ID: <55924.1460151469@server1.tristatelogic.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 21:37:51 -0000 I googled around a bit more and found some helpful information on this topic: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/49601/ Adding the line: hw.vga.textmode=1 to my /boot/loader.conf file did indeed fix the problem that I asked about, however the discussion at the above thread raised some new questions in my mind. Specifically, as noted in the above cited thread, one author noted, correctly, that if one puts the line "hw.vga.textmode=1" into the loader.conf file, then the console fonts you get on boot up look very normal, e.g. to people like me who are accustomed to what the console fonts looked like in older FreeBSD releases. However if you then start up X, and then exit X, the fonts which you then see on the console are still very normal looking, but they are then quite a bit smaller (pointsize wise) than before. Some people, e.g. one of the people who posted to the above cited thread, didn't like this. He felt that the point size of the font that he saw on the console after exiting X was too small for his pleasure. I myself have the exact opposite opinion. I would like to have the point size of my console font be small, even _before_ I start and then exit X. How can I accomplish this? I tried to figure out the answer to this question on my own, but failed. Based on various comments in various threads, I got the impression that perhaps all I needed to do was to add the following line to my loader.conf file: radeonkms_load="YES" (Yes, the system in question contains an AMD APU, which in turn contains a Radeon GPU.) Anyway, I added that line to the top of my loader.conf file and then rebooted. The result was perfectly awful. The screen (an ASUS 1920x1080 24 inch monitor) seemed to have been put into 1920x1080 graphics mode, however the whole screen was just filled with random pixels of random colors. (Ultimatedly I had to boot FreeBSD off of a USB stick so that I could edit loader.conf and remove the troublesome radeonkms_load="YES" line, just to get the system in question back to a usaable state.) So anyway, three questions: 1) What did I do wrong? Why did adding radeonkms_load="YES" to the loader.conf file result in a completely unusable system? 2) Is it possible to have freeBSD boot up and use nice small pointsize fonts immediately (on a modern 1920x1080 monitor, and with Radeon graphics hardware)? 3) If so, how would one do this? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Apr 9 06:36:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E2BB0786C for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 06:36:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vbotka@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7963A1352 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 06:36:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vbotka@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id l6so86833456wml.1 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 23:36:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version; bh=xaUVEkKmdfsY5kgLENRpqWWsgRaHCs9umnWu3a2ulok=; b=zqkioDuQTKfXBSZRmpNcejncAvsnqckdMj1hwfy4v4fFLJ3WujA2bC1DoxwHz64FjV sAzYk5m1Lxl8x/k+as2IvLFHkG6AwmgYieysdCsVx5k5Fh9KC4S/FookrhDnE4vksYc8 4y4xr9LjEKuOlOXZFwrwh9rbw4mnZx+fBytV8ielIr1b8onIA6JCeTVZ1KicmjhBzsxj 7pP9cg+J6Im1uiJKrNhgTOzz4sTqy05yDEA1mk18bvCq+YCTroGvQhy5Q1r63jX85ZdH tYS/GkMN9L7zhV73wWvDh9e/eDRdkFnCWskCwUJ2Udla7FYSJ/lbc4XNmAhhP3dOWvZA qr3Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version; bh=xaUVEkKmdfsY5kgLENRpqWWsgRaHCs9umnWu3a2ulok=; b=eQDuyZLBTerFJmAU7zbWQxbC+nLdc+kuNWK8Ui7q9qkEQAVdGWwhEjqWDXEvQwg970 OpuqWeX7bWlo0Tt6Ar8/qBFMooGSy7xy4yT9zy351B8+W+go25plVXTzf25KiyR9xbg+ SwaBRE2o4vKPcW2e3CIMRjl1aDbgYWFL76FB/Z/OnOqzgHhIrBeGNWXCR76Vz5zuj0v4 1VGQ9Wl5z/4XTm4+LIBD7VU2l67b/6qk8Onx7CYkrzsYsQWHeXlBiPAZOJwBTWONXyae 7NbKADtRbYUpQTu9ViyuDhS3udPxawM6n+s2eq8KGJU0yQQlzxSPSvQGAZ1J0Reqxefk 5MLw== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLyn37UWqejLQce5hPFTBLcCzZH279ijcPRw9rMylkxijUapW6mOr0L7840DJGCmA== X-Received: by 10.194.116.9 with SMTP id js9mr15066693wjb.112.1460183791988; Fri, 08 Apr 2016 23:36:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from planb.netng.org (ip-89-176-92-35.net.upcbroadband.cz. [89.176.92.35]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 188sm6310797wmk.6.2016.04.08.23.36.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Apr 2016 23:36:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 08:36:28 +0200 From: Vladimir Botka To: JosC Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: BSD Hardware Message-ID: <20160409083628.12ae50c4@planb.netng.org> In-Reply-To: <5707C0B3.5080506@cloudzeeland.nl> References: <5707C0B3.5080506@cloudzeeland.nl> Organization: na X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; i686-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_/jh7LjJ/Q1LpcsQffT=4R6aj"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 06:36:34 -0000 --Sig_/jh7LjJ/Q1LpcsQffT=4R6aj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:31:15 +0200 JosC wrote: > I am looking for a reliable replacement of my current BSD server. > Could someone tell me which mini business pc would fit? ... Hi! FWIW, you might want to search and browse the dmesg of various systems at http://dmesgd.nycbug.org/index.cgi?do=3Dindex Cheers, -vlado --Sig_/jh7LjJ/Q1LpcsQffT=4R6aj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXCKLsAAoJEJDRmRKO1E8B/mAH/0D1GPCMpq6q+60I8hy6jfio DG8dthP8m41ENdR9wGXwTTMd1wf9VrU4e70U+5ivLujqVEqWZCvtuPZmzHPDJiDC +w0SqCBPY9/5iv5SFdMIKPJeSmWUu8V5QwQbY0LdJHXdmPkZQuynJcQJwVBiBuL2 kC4phjmhjE7iKsgTsCqB9vzvzSBIVwpFoIw1vJuwqvm5xZpmyHhr1mfAWtcldq0k k8Wjw2JwmvWDYu7AWJZabW6q0zcl8e1CerroeTdbXeRQEFb1a1E7uACV2qIW/AJH 6bNkBEQQGt4OAxiJBLpgL+dTBC4xK6gtjctJWbt/KmxjtVr48fxgSrblmFxOIOI= =aTmp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/jh7LjJ/Q1LpcsQffT=4R6aj-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Apr 9 07:20:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB0EDB084A8 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 07:20:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsduser@cloudzeeland.nl) Received: from ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (cloudzeeland.xs4all.nl [83.161.133.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cloudzeeland.nl", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1EE7115A for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 07:20:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsduser@cloudzeeland.nl) Received: from ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (ceto.cloudzeeland.nl [10.10.10.30]) by ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B421A47B780C for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 09:20:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.10.10.34] (aegis.cloudzeeland.nl [82.176.127.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85D4B47B77AD for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 09:20:30 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: BSD Hardware To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" References: <5707C0B3.5080506@cloudzeeland.nl> From: JosC Message-ID: <5708AD42.1040305@cloudzeeland.nl> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 09:20:34 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5707C0B3.5080506@cloudzeeland.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on ceto.cloudzeeland.nl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 07:20:37 -0000 Thank you all for the suggested links and responses- it's really an eye opener. My current server is average with no specific purpose other than website, mail and ftp service. In that respect I am in favor of 1TB minimum disk capacity. No USB required. Indeed, I am running Dell for more than 15 years now and it never let me down, but I wondered if there are new possibilities with mini's (of other brands). Ran into Brix and Intel NUC5i3RYK alikes but I am not familiar with these brands (the should be reliable and keep up for minimal three years without any hardware failures). ZFS/SSD is not in the limelight currently - with 3,5" proven to be reliable and prices for WD Red 1TB+ being very acceptable, I think I stick to these for the moment. In een bericht van 8-4-2016 16:31: > I am looking for a reliable replacement of my current BSD server. > Could someone tell me which mini business pc would fit? NoSSD, but > plain vanilla SATA 2,5 or 3,5 WD Red. > Will let you know my final choice once being made. Best regards, Jos Chrispijn From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Apr 9 08:50:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D1CB09E43 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 08:50:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shamim.shahriar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x22d.google.com (mail-lf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC2CC1336 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 08:50:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shamim.shahriar@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id j11so102562629lfb.1 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 01:50:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=C8SnyGdCBc5rthIWvhu/gEoop9tVVek5VYsM3Jgm3x0=; b=CITz0Hrq/dBbbCc0+gSKiQ9ZTxNBvH5SjoLZv002tFnBFdt0F7LMtp+3Hoh8kudKgh nlgEs4dXIzCPiTg7a3vUi0zSRX6yD/fDESS01PuLofeHDJ5pUd2e9buFq5k/8fYw16QB ZDGp2Kggj+M+sPBHr/PNzBTJ0wbRKmurIyBvDct4P+n1wXqreuhomMJZ/Gqf28IHNijR bfXsSuIHgzB9auiBE6L1DlFCrWjsRJbG+QZrdPHb3bsboWK8fDVACThlIm9vhhnaw6Iu euspASGKHfqh35XKqqgXoI1h/mk2snOc01v+eh3otK3AP+j2me/wZTbU56yxj36hzuHE AOJg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=C8SnyGdCBc5rthIWvhu/gEoop9tVVek5VYsM3Jgm3x0=; b=VFAuj5TEYG+1ZOdvXJj0KlSq/8mdGBiBlvvaGtgOLn8UTmRW4qw5Ha9qVoQTPZJUoS voh+l9fx9+jLCmUYMz0b1zSl5PWtlQu6oO+OXTXvSj5tjVzM3R0QcuNxboI7ChjrSTdZ ibV3dzAJbcTd1PcRTlQjD9e+bE+DolIYrZEYHo4pTsWVoObSACCCXwqhy6TycfdlC/YL fMNrQY+3EfB/v8DeO+Zv6SFb7CXmrUcdYIaef5xK/pPEDWo2aBbRcQkdbftkyFIY5y7e bmBAz0OIkvEprmY6X9wzP5WAKciCWTuighmizfHU1gSCqDVpIT8MumZnrxp9QSkL00R/ x45Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJ1pMWmmMNfVFRTx7zUXuKkL+bWzhF1QQd5SRgZjk2fCzo8EYN606K3GyROtYfAninFW4O4SDmWWz0lXg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.205.146 with SMTP id d140mr5253360lfg.109.1460191846832; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 01:50:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.40.134 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 01:50:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.40.134 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 01:50:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5707C0B3.5080506@cloudzeeland.nl> <5708AD42.1040305@cloudzeeland.nl> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 09:50:46 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BSD Hardware From: Shamim Shahriar To: JosC Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 08:50:50 -0000 On 9 Apr 2016 08:20, "JosC" wrote: > > > Thank you all for the suggested links and responses- it's really an eye opener. > My current server is average with no specific purpose other than website, mail and ftp service. In that respect I am in favor of 1TB minimum disk capacity. No USB required. > > Indeed, I am running Dell for more than 15 years now and it never let me down, but I wondered if there are new possibilities with mini's (of other brands). > Ran into Brix and Intel NUC5i3RYK alikes but I am not familiar with these brands (the should be reliable and keep up for minimal three years without any hardware failures). > > ZFS/SSD is not in the limelight currently - with 3,5" proven to be reliable and prices for WD Red 1TB+ being very acceptable, I think I stick to these for the moment. > > In een bericht van 8-4-2016 16:31: > >> I am looking for a reliable replacement of my current BSD server. >> Could someone tell me which mini business pc would fit? NoSSD, but plain vanilla SATA 2,5 or 3,5 WD Red. >> > Will let you know my final choice once being made. > > Best regards, > > Jos Chrispijn Hello With that kind of requirement you might as well look into the pcEngines APU boards. With 4gb ram and space to fit in a 2.5inch sata, it happens to be one of the lowest power consuming device i have come across. For completeness, i should also point to certain thin clients with sufficient ram that are quite capable, depending on your load requirement. You mentioned usb is not an option, and that is a pity. I'm currently building a raspberry pi with an external 2.5 inch usb portable drive, that will do mail, web and local shares for my home (very little to no load for most of the time). It is a work in progress due to time constraints. But so far it looks very promising indeed. I'm sure there are others who has similar setup either for fun or for "production" use at noon trivial usage. Hope this helps. All the best. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Apr 9 09:56:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82102B09A8A for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 09:56:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from forward15m.cmail.yandex.net (forward15m.cmail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:b030::9c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Yandex CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B770133B for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 09:56:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from smtp3m.mail.yandex.net (smtp3m.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.130]) by forward15m.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id CC7ED2179C for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:56:40 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp3m.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3m.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 7473D27A04FA for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:56:40 +0300 (MSK) Received: by smtp3m.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id O2pQ1HYLEe-udtGk0IX; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 12:56:39 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1460195799; bh=znKApOYCCXc4JX+pKE4s+SD+u50a2N+Iz7BiNM95UN0=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Yz3F2k/HQXuq2Jy0XsUYyU6ZYzRS4Eh+Iwt3/aqLXDVLwnMc42s3INQ+ENAlRJ7KY 2a9VaQjzVDgOK3QACu7tpk8lfI6nobFZbiBwQHmpavz5J9uQhwv2boG0oHc/qdzleS eSzACcO2xJGNnlPmdRpJxUhawFOTfdyWkA5IVYrI= Authentication-Results: smtp3m.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com X-Yandex-ForeignMX: US X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0 Message-ID: <1460195797.3438.1.camel@yandex.com> Subject: Re: Fonts for vt(4) driver? From: Stari Karp To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 05:56:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <55924.1460151469@server1.tristatelogic.com> References: <55924.1460151469@server1.tristatelogic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 09:56:52 -0000 On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 14:37 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > I googled around a bit more and found some helpful information on > this topic: > >     https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/49601/ > > Adding the line: > >    hw.vga.textmode=1 > > to my /boot/loader.conf file did indeed fix the problem that I asked > about, however the discussion at the above thread raised some new > questions in my mind. > > Specifically, as noted in the above cited thread, one author noted, > correctly, that if one puts the line "hw.vga.textmode=1" into the > loader.conf file, then the console fonts you get on boot up look > very normal, e.g. to people like me who are accustomed to what the > console fonts looked like in older FreeBSD releases.  However if > you then start up X, and then exit X, the fonts which you then see > on the console are still very normal looking, but they are then > quite a bit smaller (pointsize wise) than before. > > Some people, e.g. one of the people who posted to the above cited > thread, didn't like this.  He felt that the point size of the font > that he saw on the console after exiting X was too small for his > pleasure.  I myself have the exact opposite opinion.  I would like > to have the point size of my console font be small, even _before_ > I start and then exit X.  How can I accomplish this? > > I tried to figure out the answer to this question on my own, but > failed.  Based on various comments in various threads, I got the > impression that perhaps all I needed to do was to add the following > line to my loader.conf file: > > radeonkms_load="YES" > > (Yes, the system in question contains an AMD APU, which in turn > contains a Radeon GPU.) > > Anyway, I added that line to the top of my loader.conf file and then > rebooted.  The result was perfectly awful.  The screen (an ASUS > 1920x1080 > 24 inch monitor) seemed to have been put into 1920x1080 graphics > mode, > however the whole screen was just filled with random pixels of random > colors.  (Ultimatedly I had to boot FreeBSD off of a USB stick so > that > I could edit loader.conf and remove the troublesome > radeonkms_load="YES" > line, just to get the system in question back to a usaable state.) > > So anyway, three questions: > > 1)  What did I do wrong?  Why did adding radeonkms_load="YES" to the > loader.conf file result in a completely unusable system? > > 2)  Is it possible to have freeBSD boot up and use nice small > pointsize > fonts immediately (on a modern 1920x1080 monitor, and with Radeon > graphics > hardware)? > > 3)  If so, how would one do this? > _______________________________________________ https://wiki.freebsd.org/Newcons#Font_Support I use ter-u32.fnt and it works good for me. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Apr 9 11:16:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208BEB07288; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 11:16:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timon@timon.net.nz) Received: from flare.plasmahost.ru (static.155.109.4.46.clients.your-server.de [46.4.109.155]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8EE11DFC; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 11:16:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timon@timon.net.nz) Received: from [193.41.76.135] (helo=timon.home.timon.net.nz) by flare.plasmahost.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1aoqQm-000F2S-2B; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 11:47:56 +0100 Subject: Re: REL 10.3 has no md5 checksum To: Glen Barber References: <57050250.4020700@gmail.com> <20160406202744.GB1498@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "freebsd-doc@freebsd.org" , Freebsd Questions , Ernie Luzar From: Alexandr Matveev Message-ID: <5708DDD9.1030103@timon.net.nz> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 13:47:53 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160406202744.GB1498@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 11:16:17 -0000 On 06.04.2016 23:27, Glen Barber wrote: > We cannot fix this in the announcement itself, but can note the bogus > MD5 mention in the errata.html. > > Glen > By the way, looks like 10.3-RELEASE errata (https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.3R/errata.html) is copy-pasted from 10.2-RELEASE (https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.2R/errata.html) with blind 10.2->10.3 replace. Does issues with netstat, make, etc. (mentioned at the end of the Open Issues section) still actual for 10.3-RELEASE ? -- Aleksandr Matveev From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Apr 9 12:27:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21975B09422 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:27:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from forward8m.cmail.yandex.net (forward8m.cmail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:b030::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Yandex CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 673FD1836 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 12:27:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from smtp3m.mail.yandex.net (smtp3m.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:2519::125]) by forward8m.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id EE024218F7; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 15:27:34 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp3m.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3m.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 98EB427A04FA; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 15:27:34 +0300 (MSK) Received: by smtp3m.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id qSJiKJyQGh-RXt8Ie31; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 15:27:33 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1460204854; bh=iYcN9at2dKdsyZPKrqfjWSAHqJ+QDhiXxOCfS5tKSpQ=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=SrTlHMuZbDjzZXZlFlY4ZlLw5ZrOu/5dS6qi0MEQoMjO5YQDDkr5wjfMxVQl1b/hS NXq0gSXKF6QQhCcvknmKoAGx3ZRGoMbMccQR4GbrJewiNrvwv/UzKZWgkrPs6YI4Hu 1NbswspMGneqAGn57n0SpujFj1TBvJiGRXkmoc28= Authentication-Results: smtp3m.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com X-Yandex-ForeignMX: US X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0,1 0 Message-ID: <1460204851.1430.0.camel@yandex.com> Subject: Re: Fonts for vt(4) driver? From: Stari Karp To: "Ronald F. Guilmette" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 08:27:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <55924.1460151469@server1.tristatelogic.com> References: <55924.1460151469@server1.tristatelogic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 12:27:55 -0000 On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 14:37 -0700, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > I googled around a bit more and found some helpful information on > this topic: > >     https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/49601/ > > Adding the line: > >    hw.vga.textmode=1 > > to my /boot/loader.conf file did indeed fix the problem that I asked > about, however the discussion at the above thread raised some new > questions in my mind. > > Specifically, as noted in the above cited thread, one author noted, > correctly, that if one puts the line "hw.vga.textmode=1" into the > loader.conf file, then the console fonts you get on boot up look > very normal, e.g. to people like me who are accustomed to what the > console fonts looked like in older FreeBSD releases.  However if > you then start up X, and then exit X, the fonts which you then see > on the console are still very normal looking, but they are then > quite a bit smaller (pointsize wise) than before. > > Some people, e.g. one of the people who posted to the above cited > thread, didn't like this.  He felt that the point size of the font > that he saw on the console after exiting X was too small for his > pleasure.  I myself have the exact opposite opinion.  I would like > to have the point size of my console font be small, even _before_ > I start and then exit X.  How can I accomplish this? > > I tried to figure out the answer to this question on my own, but > failed.  Based on various comments in various threads, I got the > impression that perhaps all I needed to do was to add the following > line to my loader.conf file: > > radeonkms_load="YES" > > (Yes, the system in question contains an AMD APU, which in turn > contains a Radeon GPU.) > > Anyway, I added that line to the top of my loader.conf file and then > rebooted.  The result was perfectly awful.  The screen (an ASUS > 1920x1080 > 24 inch monitor) seemed to have been put into 1920x1080 graphics > mode, > however the whole screen was just filled with random pixels of random > colors.  (Ultimatedly I had to boot FreeBSD off of a USB stick so > that > I could edit loader.conf and remove the troublesome > radeonkms_load="YES" > line, just to get the system in question back to a usaable state.) > > So anyway, three questions: > > 1)  What did I do wrong?  Why did adding radeonkms_load="YES" to the > loader.conf file result in a completely unusable system? > > 2)  Is it possible to have freeBSD boot up and use nice small > pointsize > fonts immediately (on a modern 1920x1080 monitor, and with Radeon > graphics > hardware)? > > 3)  If so, how would one do this? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freeb > sd.org" Try to put in /etc/rc.conf: kld_list="radeonkms" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Apr 9 13:48:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88979B0920E for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 13:48:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsduser@cloudzeeland.nl) Received: from ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (cloudzeeland.xs4all.nl [83.161.133.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cloudzeeland.nl", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F1251B4B for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 13:48:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsduser@cloudzeeland.nl) Received: from ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (ceto.cloudzeeland.nl [10.10.10.30]) by ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F5247B780C for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 15:48:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.10.10.34] (aegis.cloudzeeland.nl [82.176.127.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ceto.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B402547B77D1 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 15:48:45 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: BSD Hardware To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" References: <5707C0B3.5080506@cloudzeeland.nl> <5708AD42.1040305@cloudzeeland.nl> From: JosC Message-ID: <57090842.7060602@cloudzeeland.nl> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 15:48:50 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5708AD42.1040305@cloudzeeland.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on ceto.cloudzeeland.nl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 13:48:50 -0000 In een bericht van 9-4-2016 9:20: > Will let you know my final choice once being made. > Just to let you know that I finally decided to build a case around an ASUS A88XM-A (not quite a mini but I managed to find a case that exactly matches the mobo and has an external power adaptor instead of a power unit with fan. A88XM-A ATX - Socket FM2+ AMD A88X - Socket FM2+ with WD Red 1TB, 8Gb Memory and an extra NIC (work with 400Mb and 50Mb network gateways). Cheers, Jos Chrispijn From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Apr 9 14:40:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FB3B082A8 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 14:40:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E94591A3A for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 14:40:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from [75.187.32.8] ([75.187.32.8:50483] helo=raspberrypi.bildanet.com) by cdptpa-oedge02 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id BF/51-31638-C9219075; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 14:33:00 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.40] (helo=baho-utot.bildanet.com) by raspberrypi.bildanet.com with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aotwZ-00026K-TV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 10:32:59 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Baho Utot Subject: Desktop reconfig Message-ID: <5709129B.8070508@columbus.rr.com> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 10:32:59 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.130:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 14:40:20 -0000 I want to reconfigure my desktop. I want to move it from 10.1 to 11, I am using 11-CURRENT now I would like to move it to ZFS raidz1 (four drives). Here is the current setup: Win7 and freebsd 10.1 on the first hard drive ada0 $ mount /dev/ada0s3a on / (ufs, local, noatime) devfs on /dev (devfs, local, multilabel) /dev/ada1p2 on /usr/home (ufs, local, noatime) linprocfs on /compat/linux/proc (linprocfs, local) /dev/ada1p3 on /tmp (ufs, local, noatime, soft-updates) fdescfs on /dev/fd (fdescfs) $ gpart show => 63 976773105 ada0 MBR (466G) 63 1985 - free - (993K) 2048 204800 1 ntfs (100M) 206848 614195200 2 ntfs (293G) 614402048 34 - free - (17K) 614402082 362371023 3 freebsd [active] (173G) 976773105 63 - free - (32K) => 0 362371023 ada0s3 BSD (173G) 0 314572800 1 freebsd-ufs (150G) 314572800 47798222 2 freebsd-swap (23G) 362371022 1 - free - (512B) => 34 5860533101 ada1 GPT (2.7T) 34 2014 - free - (1.0M) 2048 1953122304 1 ms-basic-data (931G) 1953124352 1048576000 2 freebsd-ufs (500G) 3001700352 8388608 3 freebsd-ufs (4.0G) 3010088960 2850444175 - free - (1.3T) New setup will have freebsd on raidz with Win7 on the SSD only. Can I install the four drives for the raidz, configure and install freebsd then remove ada1 when I have it all working? or should I remove ada1 then install the raidz drives install then reinstall ada1 and the pull everything over? Will the installer handle installing root to zfs raidz? or will I have to wing it? Going for a clean install and synth to do the ports. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Apr 9 15:08:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01354B08A31 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 15:07:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B979E173D for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 15:07:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (user-24-214-48-39.knology.net [24.214.48.39]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id u39F7opK025023 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 10:07:51 -0500 Subject: Re: Desktop reconfig To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5709129B.8070508@columbus.rr.com> From: "William A. Mahaffey III" Message-ID: <57091AC6.1010600@hiwaay.net> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 10:13:20 -0453.75 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5709129B.8070508@columbus.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 15:08:00 -0000 On 04/09/16 09:39, Baho Utot wrote: > I want to reconfigure my desktop. I want to move it from 10.1 to 11, > I am using 11-CURRENT now > I would like to move it to ZFS raidz1 (four drives). > > Here is the current setup: > Win7 and freebsd 10.1 on the first hard drive ada0 > > $ mount > /dev/ada0s3a on / (ufs, local, noatime) > devfs on /dev (devfs, local, multilabel) > /dev/ada1p2 on /usr/home (ufs, local, noatime) > linprocfs on /compat/linux/proc (linprocfs, local) > /dev/ada1p3 on /tmp (ufs, local, noatime, soft-updates) > fdescfs on /dev/fd (fdescfs) > > $ gpart show > => 63 976773105 ada0 MBR (466G) > 63 1985 - free - (993K) > 2048 204800 1 ntfs (100M) > 206848 614195200 2 ntfs (293G) > 614402048 34 - free - (17K) > 614402082 362371023 3 freebsd [active] (173G) > 976773105 63 - free - (32K) > > => 0 362371023 ada0s3 BSD (173G) > 0 314572800 1 freebsd-ufs (150G) > 314572800 47798222 2 freebsd-swap (23G) > 362371022 1 - free - (512B) > > => 34 5860533101 ada1 GPT (2.7T) > 34 2014 - free - (1.0M) > 2048 1953122304 1 ms-basic-data (931G) > 1953124352 1048576000 2 freebsd-ufs (500G) > 3001700352 8388608 3 freebsd-ufs (4.0G) > 3010088960 2850444175 - free - (1.3T) > > New setup will have freebsd on raidz with Win7 on the SSD only. > > Can I install the four drives for the raidz, configure and install > freebsd then remove ada1 when I have it all working? or should I > remove ada1 then install the raidz drives install then reinstall ada1 > and the pull everything over? > > Will the installer handle installing root to zfs raidz? or will I have > to wing it? > > Going for a clean install and synth to do the ports. > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > See https://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS, particularly section 1.2.5, it will answer most of your questions. I have 2 machines running w/ FreeBSD 9.3 on ZFS filesystems (unmirrored pools, not RAIDZ's, but it isn't supposed to make any difference) & everything works AOK. I followed section 1.2.5 religiously & all went well. Some of your specific questions depend on your mobo hardware, w/ a few more details (how many (SATA ? IDE ?) HDD slots on the mobo, for example) & the list could provide more help. What I *think* you want to do is quite feasible, you won't be winging it. $0.02, no more, no less. Have a good one. -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Apr 9 18:42:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3E9B083D1 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:42:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AB7E1C8C for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 18:41:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id u206so57407328wme.1 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 11:41:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Jitu7geEVET/Yi1hVeaV0Gp8sua3Tr3LmqcthT7OShU=; b=Kqq7jzCix7EgC91Sa3Bi2m0GUE68Ne5rooHHR+Un1PlR8Jo5r3KjyEhzo7gfCzVOdC heNdM0ejU+nffRcsafSKAglnP/vm48UHI5Uy9iQ7ua6b8+yxjupNALy6FIvUCnABbDEb DIYBCLC+wg+lTcQT3v9du1MpWBmMTrJY1YjOGKhN1oIPbil9ptfKhhB/3SHAd+/dnFeu U9gDUvy1u9MMPXvoFEzBovFRvwlXapdYvHbX6vNNa3r+SwiSrjxTIqALzgaIcWzD/FEq g//jrnAvw5/KV3rNq1q9pMVwJP4eoUZL/MYCLv3Tx8evNdvEILbngQZu4HC6NAsvNiE/ ZwtA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Jitu7geEVET/Yi1hVeaV0Gp8sua3Tr3LmqcthT7OShU=; b=VFiZt4/aKZcomGnd6eFMtxBLdV7o6kAAT6z4Nh52c8T+JkJZ6b8SBcIvPmDXdo2Hum A8drwqt4/6v2BmQO8m8x5c3uKAVdk2yEijKhnVItjMBKYGEPXeB35RaQskAD9//ColMH I/YmXXuYvM41F5hfTtd4jQX++45DJcRgd7R+LSNl4EXNWgVKyuyKU35ZXGCYmsPmMChS PnLvIx8Sgz1PkiuHUUPF18o3iFCOK4KRsc2coVqPajz5nJ4a9FW8emjBkiXb5sVSt1vl 8GUy9dz8EuBO4cLIWBqrJ+tpNgmLakmaRq8kW98V4p+7x3GjOpQ/7ykrgDSCmNGThFPk /NfA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLdsKm+41kSDLv5k4f6djQADRAcARGCiyTbDTGaXfJIT9TkCrszK+lSSUhUFHBfqfV5jN1K8qgiacZiNQ== X-Received: by 10.28.212.19 with SMTP id l19mr9703825wmg.97.1460227317111; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 11:41:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.103.233 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 11:41:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <57090842.7060602@cloudzeeland.nl> References: <5707C0B3.5080506@cloudzeeland.nl> <5708AD42.1040305@cloudzeeland.nl> <57090842.7060602@cloudzeeland.nl> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2016 21:41:17 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BSD Hardware To: JosC Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 18:42:00 -0000 On 9 April 2016 at 16:48, JosC wrote: > In een bericht van 9-4-2016 9:20: > >> Will let you know my final choice once being made. >> >> Just to let you know that I finally decided to build a case around an > ASUS A88XM-A (not quite a mini but I managed to find a case that exactly > matches the mobo and has an external power adaptor instead of a power unit > with fan. > > A88XM-A > ATX - Socket FM2+ > AMD A88X - Socket FM2+ > > with WD Red 1TB, 8Gb Memory and an extra NIC (work with 400Mb and 50Mb > network gateways). > > Cheers, > > Jos Chrispijn > > Thanks for the update. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft."