From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon May 20 14:09:14 1996 Return-Path: owner-emulation Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA17036 for emulation-outgoing; Mon, 20 May 1996 14:09:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from davinci.isds.duke.edu (davinci.isds.duke.edu [152.3.22.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA17025; Mon, 20 May 1996 14:09:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from diego.isds.duke.edu (diego.isds.duke.edu [152.3.22.47]) by davinci.isds.duke.edu (8.7.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id RAA29383; Mon, 20 May 1996 17:09:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Gallatin Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by diego.isds.duke.edu (8.7.4/8.7.1) id RAA17638; Mon, 20 May 1996 17:09:10 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 17:09:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199605202109.RAA17638@diego.isds.duke.edu> To: Jake Hamby Cc: current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Congrats on CURRENT 5/1 SNAP... In-Reply-To: References: Sender: owner-emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Jake Hamby writes: > switched me back to FreeBSD for good. My plan now is to try to bring in > Solaris/ELF support (possibly from NetBSD) so that I can run all the > Solaris "goodies" like ksh, Openwindows tools, Motif, and CDE (that, along > with the fact that I do Solaris/SPARC development at work/school, was the > main reason I bought Solaris/x86 [at educational discount] in the first > place). For quite similar reasons, Solaris/x86 compatibility is something that I'd like to see happen & help with as well. Is there any ongoing work in progress on Solaris/x86 compat mode that I could help with? Drew ############################################################################## # Andrew Gallatin, Computer Project Manager # # Institute of Statistics and Decision Sciences # # Box 90251, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708-0251 # ############################################################################## From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed May 22 16:15:51 1996 Return-Path: owner-emulation Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA07454 for emulation-outgoing; Wed, 22 May 1996 16:15:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beavis.newage.com.ar (root@newage-satlink.satlink.com [200.9.212.60]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA07431 for ; Wed, 22 May 1996 16:15:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from newage.com.ar by beavis.newage.com.ar with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0uMN6Q-000smqC; Wed, 22 May 96 20:14 GMT-0300 Received: from newage by bbsnet with UUCP ; Wed, 22 May 96 20:04:37 EDT Received: by newage (NetXpress 2.54.beta2) via UUCP id 1C3663; Wed, 22 May 1996 20:08:58 -0300 To: emulation@freebsd.com From: victor.gualdi@newage.com.ar (Victor Gualdi) X-Mailer: NetXpress 2.54.beta2 Date: Wed, 22 May 1996 20:03:00 -0300 Organization: New Age BBS Subject: Compatibility with SCO UN Message-ID: <20c.69201.222@newage.com.ar> Sender: owner-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk CC: emulation@freebsd.com support@cdrom.com Hi! I am trying to execute several SCO Unix binaries under FreeBSD 2.1.0. I have set the ibcs2 emulation to yes in /etc/sysconfig but recieve an error message: Exec format error. Wrong Architecture. When trying to execute the "icobol 1.70 Server Manager" (SCO version of the DATA GENERAL Interactive COBOL) I obtain the folloging message: ------------------------------------------------------------ Starting MGS [: z_exit_error: expected integer .: Can't open sm_env ------------------------------------------------------------ And when executing the "icobol 1.70 runtime (icx)": ------------------------------------------------------------ Cannot report events, unable to open named pipe to the RPT daemon process. library: SM.R, code: 400 message arguments: data: MINISAM failed to attach to Server Manager (kap) SM_ENOSM: No server manager was available ------------------------------------------------------------ Thanks in advance. :) Victor Luis Gualdi S.A.Imp. y Exp. de la Patagonia Av. R. Saenz Pe#a 547 - P 6 (1035) Buenos Aires - Argentina --- þ CMPQwk #1.42-R2þ UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Internet: victor.gualdi@newage.com.ar (Victor Gualdi) New Age BBS - Now online! - +54(1)-797-9713 - Florida, BA - Argentina. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu May 23 07:10:00 1996 Return-Path: owner-emulation Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA14373 for emulation-outgoing; Thu, 23 May 1996 07:10:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rocky.sri.MT.net (rocky.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA14364 for ; Thu, 23 May 1996 07:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from nate@localhost) by rocky.sri.MT.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id IAA15669; Thu, 23 May 1996 08:09:27 -0600 Date: Thu, 23 May 1996 08:09:27 -0600 From: Nate Williams Message-Id: <199605231409.IAA15669@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: victor.gualdi@newage.com.ar (Victor Gualdi) Cc: emulation@freebsd.com Subject: Re: Compatibility with SCO UN In-Reply-To: <20c.69201.222@newage.com.ar> References: <20c.69201.222@newage.com.ar> Sender: owner-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I am trying to execute several SCO Unix binaries under FreeBSD > 2.1.0. I have set the ibcs2 emulation to yes in /etc/sysconfig > but recieve an error message: Exec format error. Wrong Architecture. Did you reboot after you set the flag? If not, then you need to run the program 'ibcs2' which actually loads the SCO emulation package, and try this stuff again. Nate From owner-freebsd-emulation Fri May 24 16:39:29 1996 Return-Path: owner-emulation Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA19687 for emulation-outgoing; Fri, 24 May 1996 16:39:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp (mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp [202.245.160.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA19679 for ; Fri, 24 May 1996 16:39:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost. (ppp004.kyoto-inet.or.jp [202.245.160.50]) by mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp (8.7.5/3.4W-01/10/96) with SMTP id IAA16270 for ; Sat, 25 May 1996 08:39:14 +0900 (JST) Received: (from maho@localhost) by localhost. (8.6.12/3.3W9) id IAA02179; Sat, 25 May 1996 08:40:11 +0900 Message-Id: <199605242340.IAA02179@localhost.> To: emulation@FreeBSD.org From: chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp (Maho Nakata) Reply-To: chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05 on Emacs 19.28.3, Mule 2.3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 08:39:38 +0900 Sender: owner-emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hello, I read http://www.freebsd.org/newsflash.html, and i'm interested in binary emulation system... Please give me more infomation. -------------------------------------------------------------- Kyoto Univ. Faculty of Technology, Industrial Chemistry Maho Nakata E-mail: chat95@mbox.kyoto-inet.or.jp tme1557@ug.h.kyoto-u.ac.jp -------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-emulation Sat May 25 08:26:40 1996 Return-Path: owner-emulation Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA28772 for emulation-outgoing; Sat, 25 May 1996 08:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unb15.campus.unal.edu.co ([200.21.26.240]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id IAA28763 for ; Sat, 25 May 1996 08:26:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from pedro@localhost) by unb15.campus.unal.edu.co (8.6.12/8.6.12) id KAA02833; Sat, 25 May 1996 10:26:53 -0500 Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 10:26:53 -0500 (EST) From: "Pedro Giffuni S." To: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Doubts.. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-emulation@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hello, I was wondering... Does the BSDI emulation run faster than LINUX's dosemu ? The rundos binaries (for BSDI) run under FreeBSD? (at least while it's getting ported). Does it require XWindows running? Just to have an idea, Which programs run and which don't? Why doesn't it compile, a kernel problem, or a compiler problem? regards, Pedro.