From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Oct 27 21:59:57 1996 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA01941 for stable-outgoing; Sun, 27 Oct 1996 21:59:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA01887; Sun, 27 Oct 1996 21:59:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with SMTP id RAA22604 ; Sun, 27 Oct 1996 17:16:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 0.56 #1) id E0vHgIg-0000zI-00; Sun, 27 Oct 1996 18:15:34 -0700 To: stable@freebsd.org Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: aic0: problems? Date: Sun, 27 Oct 1996 18:15:34 -0700 From: Warner Losh Message-Id: Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Has anybody successfully booted on a system that has an aic0 in 2.1.5R? I tried it on a frankenstein here, and discovered that it paniced for historical reasons :-). aic at line xxxx: SCSI-FIFO didn't drain. panic: for historical reasons Has anybody seen this? We double checked to make sure that the aic card was at 0x340 irq 11 with the easy scsi 152x config program. When we moved this to irq12, the panic went away, but it didn't find anything on the bus either :-(. Comments? Warner From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 29 13:29:08 1996 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA25088 for stable-outgoing; Tue, 29 Oct 1996 13:29:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mercury.uniserve.com (mercury.uniserve.com [204.191.197.248]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA25067; Tue, 29 Oct 1996 13:29:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from haven.uniserve.com (haven.uniserve.com [198.53.215.121]) by mercury.uniserve.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA10373; Tue, 29 Oct 1996 13:25:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 13:32:02 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Samplonius To: Warner Losh cc: stable@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: aic0: problems? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 27 Oct 1996, Warner Losh wrote: > Has anybody successfully booted on a system that has an aic0 in > 2.1.5R? Yes, an Adaptec 1510 > I tried it on a frankenstein here, and discovered that it paniced for > historical reasons :-). > > aic at line xxxx: SCSI-FIFO didn't drain. > panic: for historical reasons > > Has anybody seen this? We double checked to make sure that the aic > card was at 0x340 irq 11 with the easy scsi 152x config program. When > we moved this to irq12, the panic went away, but it didn't find > anything on the bus either :-(. > > Comments? The aic driver is very poor (and very slow), and should probably be avoided. > Warner > > Tom From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 29 15:06:13 1996 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA06538 for stable-outgoing; Tue, 29 Oct 1996 15:06:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA06525; Tue, 29 Oct 1996 15:06:10 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199610292306.PAA06525@freefall.freebsd.org> To: Tom Samplonius cc: Warner Losh , stable@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: aic0: problems? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 29 Oct 1996 13:32:02 PST." Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 15:06:10 -0800 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > The aic driver is very poor (and very slow), and should probably be >avoided. ^avoided^fixed >Tom -- Justin T. Gibbs =========================================== FreeBSD: Turning PCs into workstations =========================================== From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Oct 29 15:31:03 1996 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id PAA08887 for stable-outgoing; Tue, 29 Oct 1996 15:31:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mercury.uniserve.com (mercury.uniserve.com [204.191.197.248]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA08840; Tue, 29 Oct 1996 15:30:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from haven.uniserve.com (haven.uniserve.com [198.53.215.121]) by mercury.uniserve.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA24952; Tue, 29 Oct 1996 15:27:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 1996 15:34:00 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Samplonius To: "Justin T. Gibbs" cc: Warner Losh , stable@FreeBSD.org, questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: aic0: problems? In-Reply-To: <199610292306.PAA06525@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 29 Oct 1996, Justin T. Gibbs wrote: > > The aic driver is very poor (and very slow), and should probably be > >avoided. > > ^avoided^fixed > > >Tom Well, I don't know enough of the SCSI protocol, or the aic chipset, so I couldn't do it. Adaptec seems to have disavowed the 1510, as I can no info on their ftp site either. Anyone who really understands this stuff, is working on more recent hardware (ex. AHA 2940, and NCR PCI), which the way that it should be. BTW, how well does the 1742 driver work? This is a bit of an old card, but as I recall, it had pretty decent performance. Tom From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 31 18:36:54 1996 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA05245 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 18:36:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from salsa.gv.ssi1.com (salsa.gv.ssi1.com [146.252.44.194]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA05228; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 18:36:50 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gdonl@localhost) by salsa.gv.ssi1.com (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA05376; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 18:36:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 18:36:41 -0800 (PST) From: Don Lewis Message-Id: <199611010236.SAA05376@salsa.gv.ssi1.com> To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: rwhod buffer overflow bug Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk The wd_hostname buffer overflow bug in rwhod that came to light a couple months ago appears to have been fixed in -current, but the fix never seems to have been made to -stable. --- Truck From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 31 21:01:56 1996 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA16089 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 21:01:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA16084 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 21:01:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 0.56 #1) id E0vJBjq-0002Xd-00; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 22:01:50 -0700 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: OpenBSD to lpr/lpd merged from -current Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 22:01:50 -0700 From: Warner Losh Message-Id: Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I've merged the openbsd changes I've applied to -current to -stable: 1) No body has complained about the commits to -current. 2) Guido van Rooij reports they apply and seem to work. 3) They need to be in 2.1.6. Please refer to the commit message for -current for more details. These are mostly buffer overflow fixes, some of which are known to be exploitable/exploited in the past. Warner From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 31 22:36:50 1996 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id WAA22900 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 22:36:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA22873; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 22:36:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from rover.village.org [127.0.0.1] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 0.56 #1) id E0vJDCv-0002sf-00; Thu, 31 Oct 1996 23:35:57 -0700 To: Don Lewis Subject: Re: rwhod buffer overflow bug Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 31 Oct 1996 18:36:41 PST." <199611010236.SAA05376@salsa.gv.ssi1.com> References: <199611010236.SAA05376@salsa.gv.ssi1.com> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 23:35:57 -0700 From: Warner Losh Message-Id: Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <199611010236.SAA05376@salsa.gv.ssi1.com> Don Lewis writes: : The wd_hostname buffer overflow bug in rwhod that came to light a couple : months ago appears to have been fixed in -current, but the fix never : seems to have been made to -stable. I can do the CVS legwork if someone has a -stable system to test it on. Warner P.S. I just noticed and fixed two minor buffer related problems in rwhod.c that I happened to notice as I was looking at this code. Yow! From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Nov 1 01:08:32 1996 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id BAA09975 for stable-outgoing; Fri, 1 Nov 1996 01:08:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw-nl1.philips.com (gw-nl1.philips.com [192.68.44.33]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA09968; Fri, 1 Nov 1996 01:08:28 -0800 (PST) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by gw-nl1.philips.com (8.6.10/8.6.10-0.994n-08Nov95) id KAA19644; Fri, 1 Nov 1996 10:07:43 +0100 Received: from unknown(130.139.36.3) by gw-nl1.philips.com via smap (V1.3+ESMTP) with ESMTP id sma019531; Fri Nov 1 10:07:18 1996 Received: from spooky.lss.cp.philips.com (spooky.lss.cp.philips.com [130.144.199.105]) by smtprelay.nl.cis.philips.com (8.6.10/8.6.10-1.2.1m-961030) with ESMTP id KAA10180; Fri, 1 Nov 1996 10:07:17 +0100 Received: (from guido@localhost) by spooky.lss.cp.philips.com (8.6.10/8.6.10-0.991c-08Nov95) id KAA26376; Fri, 1 Nov 1996 10:07:16 +0100 From: Guido van Rooij Message-Id: <199611010907.KAA26376@spooky.lss.cp.philips.com> Subject: Re: rwhod buffer overflow bug To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Date: Fri, 1 Nov 1996 10:07:16 +0100 (MET) Cc: Don.Lewis@tsc.tdk.com, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: guido@gvr.win.tue.nl In-Reply-To: from Warner Losh at "Oct 31, 96 11:35:57 pm" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL19 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Warner Losh wrote: > In message <199611010236.SAA05376@salsa.gv.ssi1.com> Don Lewis writes: > : The wd_hostname buffer overflow bug in rwhod that came to light a couple > : months ago appears to have been fixed in -current, but the fix never > : seems to have been made to -stable. > > I can do the CVS legwork if someone has a -stable system to test it > on. > I've got a 2.1.5. Send them to me. (I don't believe rwhod was otherwise changed between 2.1.5 and -stable) > Warner > > P.S. I just noticed and fixed two minor buffer related problems in > rwhod.c that I happened to notice as I was looking at this code. Yow! > Send these as well ;-) -Guido