From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Aug 2 02:40:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA18788 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sun, 2 Aug 1998 02:40:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from caladan.tdx.co.uk (caladan.tdx.co.uk [195.188.177.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA18783 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 1998 02:40:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kpielorz@tdx.co.uk) Received: from localhost (kpielorz@localhost) by caladan.tdx.co.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id KAA25892; Sun, 2 Aug 1998 10:40:28 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 1998 10:40:28 +0100 (BST) From: Karl Pielorz To: Pecsenyanszky Istvan cc: Julian Elischer , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: quota's and corruption In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 2 Aug 1998, Pecsenyanszky Istvan wrote: > We don't use CCD, our 35GB fs is on hardware raid. OK, that's one thing that they don't have in common. You mentioned you had a crash - we also had a crash about 2 - 3 weeks before we noticed anything wrong. When we found the corruption we backed up the filesystem there and then, and ran FSCK on it - which did't report any errors... So far we've put it in the 'keep an eye' on arena, and made sure the backups get done on a regular basis... I'm going to see if I can pursuade tripwire to crc the files today - just to keep an eye on them ;-) Regards, Karl To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Aug 2 06:57:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA13718 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sun, 2 Aug 1998 06:57:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de [192.35.17.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA13709 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 1998 06:57:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de) X-Envelope-Sender-Is: andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de (at relayer david.siemens.de) Received: from mail.siemens.de (salomon.siemens.de [139.23.33.13]) by david.siemens.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA05471 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 1998 15:57:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (daemon@curry.mchp.siemens.de [146.180.31.23]) by mail.siemens.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA11567 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 1998 15:57:28 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA10825 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 1998 15:57:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from server.us.tld(192.168.16.33) via SMTP by curry.mchp.siemens.de, id smtpdq10820; Sun Aug 2 15:57:28 1998 Received: (from daemon@localhost) by server.us.tld (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA20883 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 1998 15:57:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andre@bali.us.tld) Received: from bali.us.tld(192.168.21.100) via SMTP by server.us.tld, id smtpdk20744; Sun Aug 2 15:57:26 1998 Received: (from andre@localhost) by bali.us.tld (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA26931; Sun, 2 Aug 1998 15:57:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andre) From: Andre Albsmeier Message-Id: <199808021357.PAA26931@bali.us.tld> Subject: Re: quota In-Reply-To: from Julian Elischer at "Aug 1, 98 07:39:16 pm" To: julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer) Date: Sun, 2 Aug 1998 15:57:25 +0200 (CEST) Cc: pecseny@inf.bme.hu, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The quota system is known to be rather inefficient when very large UIDs are used. See also http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=2325 Probably during a crash the fs got screwed up and resulted in a file with a large UID. This caused quotacheck to run that long time. I first realized this when my PCNFS users started to write files as nobody which appeared in FreeBSD as a file with UID 4294967294 IIRC. I changed this behaviour with two rather ugly kernel patches that map all UIDs greater than 65535 to nobody :-) -Andre > Szia! > > even now that you know how to clean this up, it should not have > happenned.. > did you have a crash that corrupted the disk? > > julian@freebsd.org > > On Sun, 2 Aug 1998, Pecsenyanszky Istvan wrote: > > > Problem solved. I've found some strange file entries in the /home > > partition (eg. br-xr-xrwT 1 9428779 4118365 uchg,uunlnk,sappnd,sunlnk 106, > > 0x63690065 Jun 30 1993 ...) > > I've chflag'd and deleted them, and everything works fine now. > > > > Istvan > > > > > > On Thu, 30 Jul 1998, I wrote: > > > > > we have a 2.2.6-RELEASE FreeBSD box, with a large file system mounted as > > > /home with user quotas. The problem is that the quota informations are > > > incorrect in some cases. If I try quotacheck the file system, I get the > > > following error message (in 5 hours): > > > > > > quotacheck: /home/quota.user: seek failed: File too large > > > THE FOLLOWING FILE SYSTEM HAD AN UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY: > > > /dev/rsd0s1e (/home) > > > > > > I tried to move quota.user to quota.user.old, fsck /home and then > > > quotacheck again, but it didn't help, I got the same error. > > > > > > The size of this fs is 35GB, and there is approx. 67000 different UIDs > > > between 10000 and 77088. > > > > > > Any help is appreciated. > > > > > > Istvan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Aug 3 09:11:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA15536 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 09:11:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from atlrel1.hp.com (atlrel1.hp.com [156.153.255.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA15530 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 09:11:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from keithm@hprrc726.rose.hp.com) Received: from hprrc726.rose.hp.com (hprrc181.rose.hp.com [15.56.217.181]) by atlrel1.hp.com (8.8.6/8.8.5tis) with ESMTP id MAA17388 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:10:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by hprrc726.rose.hp.com (1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3) id AA073810650; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 09:10:50 -0700 From: Keith Middlekauff Message-Id: <199808031610.AA073810650@hprrc726.rose.hp.com> Subject: ftp and chroot To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 3 Aug 98 9:10:50 PDT Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85] Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, I am working with an ISP who is testing the viability of using FreeBSD as their primary platform. We currently use HP-UX based servers and workstations. We run wu-ftpd and modify the users home directory in /etc/passwd to force the ftpd to chroot the login. We have compiled wu-ftpd with no problem on the FreeBSD OS and can implement this in the same way we do now. The question is in regards to the ftpd that ships with FreeBSD. In reading the man page for it I can see that it also will perform a chroot if the user or @group is included in the /etc/ftpchroot file. What are the ISP's using for this functionality? Are you using the wuftpd or the standard ftpd in FreeBSD? How long has this functionality been there in the ftpd that comes with FreeBSD? Thanks, Keith To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Aug 3 09:19:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA18111 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 09:19:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from russian-caravan.cloud9.net (russian-caravan.cloud9.net [168.100.1.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA18103 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 09:19:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ashley@cloud9.net) Received: from earl-grey.cloud9.net (IDENT:MMeDbGE4PHM4tUJ2cJPsw/f8/yrQmkR9@earl-grey.cloud9.net [168.100.1.1]) by russian-caravan.cloud9.net (8.9.0/8.9.0/rc-19980602) with SMTP id MAA15705 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:19:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:19:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Ashley Streb To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: restore error on quota file systems Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I am having a problem using restore under FreeBSD 2.2.6-Release. The problem only exists on two disk partitions, both of which have quota turned on. Any other disk partition I can restore with no problem. Specifically, when I try to restore from tape using "restore ivbf 2 -" I get a bus error.... Verify tape and initialize maps Dump date: Sat Jul 11 02:20:12 1998 Dumped from: Fri Jul 10 02:16:46 1998 Level 1 dump of /home/users on earl-grey.cloud9.net:/dev/sd1s1e Label: none Bus error Additonally, for AMANDA users out there, the following error is generated: Level 1 dump of /home/users on earl-grey.cloud9.net:/dev/sd1s1e Label: none Error 32 (Broken pipe) offset 65536+32768, wrote -272640132 amrestore: pipe reader has quit in middle of file. amrestore: skipping ahead to start of next file, please wait... Bus error I have searched the mail archives and can't find any reference to this problem. Does anybody have any ideas/run into a similiar problem? -Ashley ========================================================================== Ashley Streb +1 914 696 4000 office ashley@Cloud9.Net Cloud 9 Internet http://www.cloud9.net White Plains, NY finger Info@Cloud9.Net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Aug 3 11:27:20 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA11829 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 11:27:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from caladan.tdx.co.uk (caladan.tdx.co.uk [195.188.177.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA11784 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 11:26:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luke@21.org) Received: from 21.org (lorca-tx.tdx.co.uk [195.188.177.242]) by caladan.tdx.co.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA14758; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 19:24:09 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <35C60049.230E0279@21.org> Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1998 19:24:09 +0100 From: Luke Skywalker X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5b1 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Keith Middlekauff CC: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ftp and chroot References: <199808031610.AA073810650@hprrc726.rose.hp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Keith Middlekauff wrote: > What are the ISP's using for this functionality? Are you using the > wuftpd or the standard ftpd in FreeBSD? > > How long has this functionality been there in the ftpd that comes with > FreeBSD? Hi, I looked at the ftpd that ships with FreeBSD, and wu-ftpd. We're currently running wu-ftp'd - and we use it's chroot facility... I couldn't get the '@group' chroot facility working in the FreeBSD ftpd - that's not to say it doesn't work, just that I couldn't get it to work in the time I had available... In the end we were swayed by wu because it's used by a lot of places - and setting uo the chrooting / welcome messages etc. was a snap, in reality - I'd really like one that chroot's and can do an internal ls... (wu doesn't appear to at the moment - or again, due to lack of time - I can't make it do it ;-) I know we're once again looking at the FreeBSD one - hoping solving the chroot'ing myster is quicker than solving the 'internal ls' on wu-ftpd ;-) I hope that helps? (Maybe not as clear cut as I'd have wanted to make it ;-) Regards, Karl To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Aug 3 12:35:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA23943 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:35:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from darla.swimsuit.internet.dk (mail.swimsuit.internet.dk [194.255.12.232]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA23924 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:35:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leifn@internet.dk) Received: from darla.swimsuit.internet.dk (darla.swimsuit.internet.dk [192.168.0.10]) by darla.swimsuit.internet.dk (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id VAA03346 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 21:34:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 21:34:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Leif Neland Reply-To: leifn@internet.dk To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: route problems Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org We have two livingston's which gives the dialins ip's in one net (194.255.12.x) while the rest of the net and servers are in another net (194.19.140.x). The we have a cisco for our uplink, which we can't control. How can the cisco know which livingston to route to to get to a dialin? What if we get more livingston's, and somebody with a fixed ip could get either one or the other livingston? Also, perhaps related, sometimes when I dial in, I can ping our servers, but a traceroute stops at the cisco to the uplink. But if I log in to a server, I can reach the rest of the world. Is it because the cisco sometimes doesn't know the route to the dialin? Leif Neland leifn@internet.dk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Aug 3 12:43:20 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA25998 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:43:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from neuromancer.quiknet.com (neuromancer.quiknet.com [207.183.226.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA25968 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:43:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from emessiah@neuromancer.quiknet.com) Received: from neuromancer.quiknet.com ([127.0.0.1]) by neuromancer.quiknet.com (post.office MTA v2.0 0906 ID# 0-11863) with SMTP id AAA631 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:43:06 -0700 Message-ID: <19980803124306.A508@crackpipe.org> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:43:06 -0700 From: emessiah@crackpipe.org To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ftp and chroot References: <199808031610.AA073810650@hprrc726.rose.hp.com> <35C60049.230E0279@21.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <35C60049.230E0279@21.org>; from Luke Skywalker on Mon, Aug 03, 1998 at 07:24:09PM +0100 X-Operating-System: Linux neuromancer.quiknet.com 2.0.35 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Aug 03, 1998 at 07:24:09PM +0100, Luke Skywalker wrote: > Keith Middlekauff wrote: > > > What are the ISP's using for this functionality? Are you using the > > wuftpd or the standard ftpd in FreeBSD? > > > > How long has this functionality been there in the ftpd that comes with > > FreeBSD? > > I looked at the ftpd that ships with FreeBSD, and wu-ftpd. We're currently > running wu-ftp'd - and we use it's chroot facility... I switched from Wu to ProFtpd. http://www.proftpd.org Chroot'ing certain groups is even simpler to configure than in Wuftp. Regards, Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Aug 3 12:49:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA27353 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:49:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from darla.swimsuit.internet.dk (mail.swimsuit.internet.dk [194.255.12.232]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA27334 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:49:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leifn@internet.dk) Received: from darla.swimsuit.internet.dk (darla.swimsuit.internet.dk [192.168.0.10]) by darla.swimsuit.internet.dk (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id VAA03405 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 21:49:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 1998 21:49:02 +0200 (CEST) From: Leif Neland Reply-To: leifn@internet.dk To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ETRN troubles Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Our mailserver is secondary MX for several dialin-nodes, which pick up their mail by ETRN Sometimes when a dialin node wants to receive its mail and issues an ETRN, it doesn't receive it. Could it be because sendmail has already started trying to deliver it, while the node is off-line, and therefore the mail is busy, or because it has already been tried to be delivered a few minutes ago, and therefore sendmail won't deliver it so soon? Should (and can) I persuade sendmail to never try to deliver to nodes doing ETRN before they ask for it? Or only try to deliver once, and then just queue the mail for pickup? Leif Neland leifn@internet.dk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Aug 3 14:11:36 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA09555 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 14:11:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from postman.true.net (s1.admin.true.net [161.196.66.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA09529 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 14:11:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lem@cantv.net) Received: from s2.admin.true.net (mail.cantv.net [161.196.66.21]) by postman.true.net (8.8.7/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA25159; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 17:11:10 -0400 (VET) Received: from lem.cantv.net (root@localhost) by s2.admin.true.net (8.8.7/CS-R-1.4) with SMTP id RAA08781; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 17:10:15 -0400 (VET) X-BlackMail: ws-7.chacao-01.int.cantv.net, lem.cantv.net, lem@cantv.net, 200.44.44.23 X-Authenticated-Timestamp: 17:10:15(VET) on August 03, 1998 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980803170617.008bd100@pop.cantv.net> X-Sender: lem@pop.cantv.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1998 17:06:17 -0400 To: leifn@internet.dk From: Luis Munoz Subject: Re: route problems Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 09:34 PM 03/08/1998 +0200, Leif Neland wrote: >We have two livingston's which gives the dialins ip's in one net >(194.255.12.x) while the rest of the net and servers are in another net >(194.19.140.x). The we have a cisco for our uplink, which we can't >control. > >How can the cisco know which livingston to route to to get to a dialin? > >What if we get more livingston's, and somebody with a fixed ip could get >either one or the other livingston? Your best bet here is to run an IGP with the cisco (you need to talk to your router admin for this). I succesfully ran an installation with ~120 modems using RIP *only* for the dialup pools. Keep in mind that you might need to config the netmask table on the livingston but in your scenario, perhaps this does not hurt. On the servers (which I suppose are FreeBSD because the post to the list ;) point a static route towards the cisco. He'll know how to get to the dialup pool or to a blackhole if you need to. >Also, perhaps related, sometimes when I dial in, I can ping our servers, >but a traceroute stops at the cisco to the uplink. But if I log in to a >server, I can reach the rest of the world. > >Is it because the cisco sometimes doesn't know the route to the dialin? Could be so. But if you can ping something outside your net, this is not the problem. Regards, -lem To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Aug 3 14:11:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA09562 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 14:11:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from postman.true.net (s1.admin.true.net [161.196.66.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA09532 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 14:11:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lem@cantv.net) Received: from s2.admin.true.net (mail.cantv.net [161.196.66.21]) by postman.true.net (8.8.7/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA25157; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 17:11:10 -0400 (VET) Received: from lem.cantv.net (root@localhost) by s2.admin.true.net (8.8.7/CS-R-1.4) with SMTP id RAA08778; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 17:10:15 -0400 (VET) X-BlackMail: ws-7.chacao-01.int.cantv.net, lem.cantv.net, lem@cantv.net, 200.44.44.23 X-Authenticated-Timestamp: 17:10:15(VET) on August 03, 1998 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980803170130.008b78d0@pop.cantv.net> X-Sender: lem@pop.cantv.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Mon, 03 Aug 1998 17:01:30 -0400 To: leifn@internet.dk From: Luis Munoz Subject: Re: ETRN troubles Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 09:49 PM 03/08/1998 +0200, Leif Neland wrote: >Our mailserver is secondary MX for several dialin-nodes, which pick up >their mail by ETRN > >Sometimes when a dialin node wants to receive its mail and issues an ETRN, >it doesn't receive it. > >Could it be because sendmail has already started trying to deliver it, >while the node is off-line, and therefore the mail is busy, or because it >has already been tried to be delivered a few minutes ago, and therefore >sendmail won't deliver it so soon? The locks on the mail queue affect a single piece of mail (ie, you lock a message and not a site) so I think this is rather difficult. The ETRN command behaves (or should behave) like a sendmail -qRxxxx which invalidates any history information you could have about the particular destination, if you have that option set. >Should (and can) I persuade sendmail to never try to deliver to nodes >doing ETRN before they ask for it? Or only try to deliver once, and then >just queue the mail for pickup? If you have a machine dedicated to this task, this is as simple as having sendmail not run the queue periodically and configure it to always queue mail. This would do what you want, however I don't think this can solve the problem... I would suggest that you track the software on the client side to look for some pattern there (MS products? ;) Another alternative would be to define a high-numbered port for each customer of this kind of service and use inted.conf to tie this to a sendmail -qRxxxx -v and the customer can execute a telnet to that port (and see any errors also :) We've done this with enough success to maintain it, but I believe ETRN is a cleaner solution if you can afford a server for this. Regards. -lem To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Aug 3 23:17:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA06550 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 23:17:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.keyworld.net (mail.keyworld.net [194.21.164.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA06544 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 1998 23:17:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mailing@keyworld.net) Received: from scanner (scanner.keyworld.net [194.21.164.17]) by mail.keyworld.net (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id IAA19359 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 08:10:50 +0200 Message-Id: <199808040610.IAA19359@mail.keyworld.net> From: "Nicholas Aquilina" To: Subject: news service problems Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 08:18:19 +0200 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1161 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi all, During the past three days, I am getting a message from my news server saying that there was a problem removing expired files. Looking forward for a reply. Nicholas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Aug 4 04:40:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA09468 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 04:40:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from asterix.webaffairs.net (pp20.bonn.germanynet.de [151.189.67.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA09395 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 04:40:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stefan@asterix.webaffairs.net) Received: from obelix (obelix.webaffairs.net [192.168.10.3]) by asterix.webaffairs.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA10311; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:34:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stefan@asterix.webaffairs.net) From: "Stefan Herrmann" To: "Luke Skywalker" , "Keith Middlekauff" Cc: Subject: RE: ftp and chroot Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 13:31:23 +0200 Message-ID: <000f01bdbf9b$68bbb4d0$030aa8c0@obelix.webaffairs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26 In-Reply-To: <35C60049.230E0279@21.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Keith Middlekauff wrote: > > > What are the ISP's using for this functionality? Are you using the > > wuftpd or the standard ftpd in FreeBSD? > > I looked at the ftpd that ships with FreeBSD, and wu-ftpd. We're currently > running wu-ftp'd - and we use it's chroot facility... We use this ftpd and have not encountered any problems. Works fine for about 250 customers. > I couldn't get the '@group' chroot facility working in the FreeBSD ftpd - that's > not to say it doesn't work, just that I couldn't get it to work in the time I > had available... "@group" is fairly easy to configure, as the whole chroot thing of ftpd. We had no problems getting it to run. bye Stefan Herrmann Hostmaster seicom.NET -- Seicom GmbH Laiblinsplatz 12 Internet Service Provider D-72793 Pfullingen Tel: +49 7121 9770-0 http://www.seicom.NET/ Fax: +49 7121 9770-19 http://www.schwaben.de/ ---->> seicom.NET - making information available <<---- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Aug 4 06:04:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA21076 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 06:04:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from magicnet.magicnet.net (magicnet.magicnet.net [204.96.116.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA21063 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 06:04:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bill@bilver.magicnet.net) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by magicnet.magicnet.net (8.8.6/8.8.8) with UUCP id JAA15394 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 09:01:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from bill@localhost) by bilver.magicnet.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id IAA12731 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 08:49:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Vermillion Message-Id: <199808041249.IAA12731@bilver.magicnet.net> Subject: Re: news service problems In-Reply-To: <199808040610.IAA19359@mail.keyworld.net> from Nicholas Aquilina at "Aug 4, 98 08:18:19 am" To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 08:49:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Nicholas Aquilina recently said: > Hi all, > > During the past three days, I am getting a message from my news server > saying that there was a problem removing expired files. > Well is that the 'exact' message. You didn't indicated what news program you use. I'm still with c-news and a small uucp feed - most comp.unix and 20 or so others. Troubles can be 1) running out of space in /tmp if that's where the /tmp files are stored. Change it so that /tmp points to a file system with more free space. History files require twice the amount of memory as one is built completely before the original is rnamed. 2) permission problems. Assuming that 'news' owns the files is your cron set to have a news crontab. If you have ever unbatched manually and you were not su - 'd to the news user - then that could be problem. Go to you news directory and see if the permissions match. If not, from that directory, use this syntax find . -user -exec chown gooduser:goodgroup {} \; I have found that 95% of news problems are 1) no space, 2) wrong permissions. However I have seen overfull directories give problems. I've not seen this on FreeBSD, but then there was no BSD avaiable for the general public use back when I first put up B-News in 1986 :-) Curious question. If you are running FreeBSD why are you running Microsoft Mail? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Aug 4 17:33:52 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA28119 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:33:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA28055 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:33:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA04588 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:30:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199808050030.RAA04588@implode.root.com> To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Mylex DAC960SXI external RAID controller From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Tue, 04 Aug 1998 17:30:21 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Anyone here have experiance with the Mylex DAC960SXI external (SCSI-SCSI) RAID controller? I'm planning on using one in the next wcarchive upgrade, and I'm interested in hearing anything good/bad about it. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Aug 4 22:42:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA14847 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 22:42:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ccvp.com ([207.66.28.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA14737 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 22:42:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from robert@usamd.com) Received: from usamd.com ([207.66.33.213]) by ccvp.com (8.8.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id XAA13765 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 1998 23:42:20 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <35C844EF.DCED437@usamd.com> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1998 05:41:35 -0600 From: Robert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: WatchGuard vs CISCO Pix? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Need to recommend firewall to government facility need to know pros and cons. WatchGuard vs CISCO Pix. Thanks R -- Download our price list at ftp://207.66.33.212/pub/readme/ Visit our web site at http://www.usamd.com Robert Clark USA Microdynamics PO Box 13569 Albuquerque, NM 87192-3569 Phone 505 275-0188 Fax 505 275-8708 sales@usamd.com info@usamd.com support@usamd.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Aug 5 05:35:52 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA07141 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 05:35:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hack.babel.dk (hack.babel.dk [194.255.106.77]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA07128 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 05:35:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shredder@hack.babel.dk) Received: from localhost (shredder@localhost) by hack.babel.dk (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id OAA29292 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 14:35:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 1998 14:35:38 +0200 (CEST) From: chrw To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: pop3/tcp server failing (looping) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, Aug 5 14:10:15 bogpost inetd[111]: pop3/tcp server failing (looping), service terminated - anyone know what might cause this? its an fbsd 2.2.6 running the cucipop pop3 port. The pop3 daemon stops acceping clients afterwards. Regards, CW To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Aug 5 07:05:10 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA19867 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 07:05:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from caladan.tdx.co.uk (caladan.tdx.co.uk [195.188.177.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA19846 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 07:04:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kpielorz@tdx.co.uk) Received: from tdx.co.uk (lorca-tx.tdx.co.uk [195.188.177.242]) by caladan.tdx.co.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA26368; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 15:04:24 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <35C86679.E1726F42@tdx.co.uk> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1998 15:04:41 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz Organization: TDX X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5b1 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: chrw CC: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pop3/tcp server failing (looping) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This means inetd is having to run the POP3 server too often... As a safety measure inetd will stop running a service if it has to start it excessively... It probably means your pop3 server is having a problem, and quiting straight away... You'll need to look at your pop3 logs, or /var/log/messages - to see if theres any reason causing it to quit... Regards, Karl chrw wrote: > > Hello, > > Aug 5 14:10:15 bogpost inetd[111]: pop3/tcp server failing (looping), > service terminated > > - anyone know what might cause this? its an fbsd 2.2.6 running the > cucipop pop3 port. The pop3 daemon stops acceping clients afterwards. > > Regards, > > CW > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Aug 5 08:00:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA27608 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 08:00:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from freefall.pipeline.ch (intranet.pipeline.ch [195.134.128.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA27602 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 08:00:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andre@pipeline.ch) Received: from pipeline.ch ([195.134.128.41]) by freefall.pipeline.ch (Netscape Mail Server v2.02) with ESMTP id AAA333; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 16:58:12 +0200 Message-ID: <35C87338.C5206E67@pipeline.ch> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 1998 16:59:04 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [en] (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: chrw CC: "freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Re: pop3/tcp server failing (looping) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org chrw wrote: > > Hello, > > Aug 5 14:10:15 bogpost inetd[111]: pop3/tcp server failing (looping), > service terminated > > - anyone know what might cause this? its an fbsd 2.2.6 running the > cucipop pop3 port. The pop3 daemon stops acceping clients afterwards. Yea, that is a 'feature' of inetd. If you have too many connects in a certain time it assumes the called program isn't working and shuts it up. A far better alternative is tcpserver from DJB: ftp://koobera.math.uic.edu/www/ucspi-tcp.html -- Andre Oppermann CEO / Geschaeftsfuehrer Internet Business Solutions Ltd. (AG) Hardstrasse 235, 8005 Zurich, Switzerland Fon +41 1 277 75 75 / Fax +41 1 277 75 77 http://www.pipeline.ch ibs@pipeline.ch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Aug 5 08:25:11 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA01137 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 08:25:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from carp.gbr.epa.gov (carp.gbr.epa.gov [204.46.159.110]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA01118 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 08:25:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjenkins@carp.gbr.epa.gov) Received: (from mjenkins@localhost) by carp.gbr.epa.gov (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA10784 for freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 10:24:39 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mjenkins) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 1998 10:24:39 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Jenkins Message-Id: <199808051524.KAA10784@carp.gbr.epa.gov> To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pop3/tcp server failing (looping) In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 5 Aug 1998 14:35:38 +0200 (CEST), chrw wrote: > Aug 5 14:10:15 bogpost inetd[111]: pop3/tcp server failing (looping), > service terminated > > - anyone know what might cause this? its an fbsd 2.2.6 running the > cucipop pop3 port. The pop3 daemon stops acceping clients afterwards. Sorry, I forgot to Cc: freebsd-isp. From mjenkins Wed Aug 5 08:11:46 1998 To: shredder@hack.babel.dk Subject: Re: pop3/tcp server failing (looping) In-Reply-To: Try the -R switch to inetd. Also see the manual page for inetd which describes the looping message under ERROR MESSAGES. Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Aug 5 22:58:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA04258 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 22:58:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from super-g.inch.com (super-g.com [207.240.140.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA04251 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 1998 22:58:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from spork@super-g.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by super-g.inch.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA02032; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 01:58:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 01:58:18 -0400 (EDT) From: spork X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com To: chrw cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pop3/tcp server failing (looping) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In inetd.conf, just change "nowait" to "nowait.100" or however many connections/minute you need... It's in the man page somewhere. Charles Charles Sprickman spork@super-g.com ---- "I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man Just a mortal with potential of a superman I'm living on" -DB On Wed, 5 Aug 1998, chrw wrote: > > Hello, > > Aug 5 14:10:15 bogpost inetd[111]: pop3/tcp server failing (looping), > service terminated > > - anyone know what might cause this? its an fbsd 2.2.6 running the > cucipop pop3 port. The pop3 daemon stops acceping clients afterwards. > > Regards, > > CW > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Aug 6 05:39:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA28921 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 05:39:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from carp.gbr.epa.gov (carp.gbr.epa.gov [204.46.159.110]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA28915 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 05:39:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjenkins@carp.gbr.epa.gov) Received: (from mjenkins@localhost) by carp.gbr.epa.gov (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA12408; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 07:38:57 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mjenkins) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 07:38:57 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Jenkins Message-Id: <199808061238.HAA12408@carp.gbr.epa.gov> To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pop3/tcp server failing (looping) Cc: shredder@hack.babel.dk, spork@super-g.com In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 6 Aug 1998 01:58:18 -0400 (EDT) Charles Sprickman wrote: > In inetd.conf, just change "nowait" to "nowait.100" or however many > connections/minute you need... It's in the man page somewhere. At first I thought Charles was talking about Linux (and he was in syntax) but the FreeBSD inetd(8) manual page shows: {wait|nowait}[/max-child[/max-connections-per-ip-per-minute]] The maximum number of outstanding child processes (or ``threads'') for a ``nowait'' service may be explicitly specified by appending a ``/'' fol- lowed by the number to the ``nowait'' keyword. Normally (or if a value of zero is specified) there is no maximum. Otherwise, once the maximum is reached, further connection attempts will be queued up until an existing child process exits. This also works in the case of ``wait'' mode, al- though a value other than one (the default) might not make sense in some cases. You can also specify the maximum number of connections per minute for a given IP address by appending a ``/'' followed by the number to the maximum number of outstanding child processes. Once the maximum is reached, further conections from this IP address will be dropped until the end of the minute. So the -R switch applies to all services but you can taylor individual services with the nowait/max-child/rate field. This FreeBSD is good stuff! Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Aug 6 09:51:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA05973 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 09:51:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mercury.jorsm.com (mercury.jorsm.com [207.112.128.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA05960 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 09:50:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jer@jorsm.com) Received: from localhost (jer@localhost) by mercury.jorsm.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id LAA16848; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 11:50:26 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 11:50:26 -0500 (CDT) From: Jeremy Shaffner To: Chris cc: Bill Fumerola , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: installing over a network, problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 28 Jul 1998, Chris wrote: > i never had a problem with my other box running 2.2.5 with a 3com509b, can > you think of anything that might be wrong? > > -Chris I thought the B was *unsupported* prior to 2.2.7? -===================================================================- Jeremy Shaffner JORSM Internet Senior Technical Support Northwest Indiana's Premium jer@jorsm.com Internet Service Provider support@jorsm.com http://www.jorsm.com -===================================================================- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Aug 6 11:26:43 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA24050 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 11:26:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from jupiter.connecticom.com (jupiter.connecticom.com [209.3.110.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA24043 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 11:26:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kitt@connecticom.com) Received: from [209.3.110.25] (orion.connecticom.com [209.3.110.25]) by jupiter.connecticom.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA03416 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 14:24:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Sender: sysadmin@mail.connecticom.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 14:26:16 -0400 To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: Kitt Diebold Subject: ethernet cards... Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I am going to set up an inexpensive router for an in-building network (we sell internet access to other businesses in the building and we'd rather route than switch netween segments) and I would like to do it with FreeBSD. All of the routing will be through ethernet interfaces. Since the number is PCI/ISA slots in motherboards are limited, I was wondering if anyone had seen any ethernet cards (10 or 10/100) that had multiple independant ethernet ports on a single PCI or ISA card that was compatilble with FreeBSD. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks! -Kitt Connecticom, Inc. Internet Services for Business (web hosting & programming) (716) 546-3510 http://www.connecticom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Aug 6 11:55:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA00704 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 11:55:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from inet.chipweb.ml.org (c1003518-a.plstn1.sfba.home.com [24.1.82.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA00668 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 11:54:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ludwigp@bigfoot.com) Message-Id: <199808061854.LAA00668@hub.freebsd.org> Received: (qmail 138 invoked from network); 6 Aug 1998 18:54:04 -0000 Received: from speedy.chipweb.ml.org (172.16.1.1) by inet.chipweb.ml.org with SMTP; 6 Aug 1998 18:54:04 -0000 X-Sender: ludwigp2@mail-r X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.1 Date: Thu, 06 Aug 1998 11:53:59 -0700 To: Jeremy Shaffner , Chris From: Ludwig Pummer Subject: Re: installing over a network, problems Cc: Bill Fumerola , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 11:50 AM 8/6/98 -0500, Jeremy Shaffner wrote: >On Tue, 28 Jul 1998, Chris wrote: > >> i never had a problem with my other box running 2.2.5 with a 3com509b, can >> you think of anything that might be wrong? >> >> -Chris > >I thought the B was *unsupported* prior to 2.2.7? > You're confusing the 3c905b with the 3c509b. The 3c509b is the ISA EtherLink III card. The 3c905b is the PCI (Fast) EtherLink XL which has been giving everyone trouble. Is the 3c905b supported in 2.2.7? The release notes don't say anything about it. --Ludwig Pummer ludwigp@bigfoot.com ludwigp@chipweb.ml.org ICQ UIN: 692441 http://chipweb.home.ml.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Aug 6 12:25:03 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA07533 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 12:25:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mercury.jorsm.com (mercury.jorsm.com [207.112.128.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA07466 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 12:24:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jer@jorsm.com) Received: from localhost (jer@localhost) by mercury.jorsm.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id OAA24607; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 14:24:18 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 14:24:18 -0500 (CDT) From: Jeremy Shaffner To: Ludwig Pummer cc: Chris , Bill Fumerola , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: installing over a network, problems In-Reply-To: <199808061854.NAA23082@mercury.jorsm.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, Ludwig Pummer wrote: > At 11:50 AM 8/6/98 -0500, Jeremy Shaffner wrote: > >On Tue, 28 Jul 1998, Chris wrote: > > > >> i never had a problem with my other box running 2.2.5 with a 3com509b, can > >> you think of anything that might be wrong? > >> > >> -Chris > > > >I thought the B was *unsupported* prior to 2.2.7? > > > > You're confusing the 3c905b with the 3c509b. > The 3c509b is the ISA EtherLink III card. > The 3c905b is the PCI (Fast) EtherLink XL which has been giving everyone > trouble. > So I am. My mistake. > Is the 3c905b supported in 2.2.7? The release notes don't say anything > about it. It's entirely possible that my confusion prompted this assumption, but I thought I saw a post on one of the lists regarding someone using a new beta driver for the 905B that made it into 2.2.7. -===================================================================- Jeremy Shaffner JORSM Internet Senior Technical Support Northwest Indiana's Premium jer@jorsm.com Internet Service Provider support@jorsm.com http://www.jorsm.com -===================================================================- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Aug 6 14:25:17 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA08149 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 14:25:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lily.ezo.net (lily.ezo.net [206.102.130.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA07969 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 14:24:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jflowers@ezo.net) Received: from ivy.ezo.net (c3po.skylan.net [206.150.211.243]) by lily.ezo.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id RAA18059; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 17:22:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <008701bdc180$c5a76ae0$f3d396ce@ivy.ezo.net> From: "Jim Flowers" To: , "Kitt Diebold" Subject: Re: ethernet cards... Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 17:25:44 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Kitt, Why not just use an Ethernet hub for the physical connections to your client computers and then use ipfw with the router software in your fbsd box to set up a logical connection to each client gateway. Tough to beat an 8-port hub for cost and you don't care much about speed (relatively) delivering the Internet. -----Original Message----- From: Kitt Diebold To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Thursday, August 06, 1998 5:14 PM Subject: ethernet cards... >I am going to set up an inexpensive router for an in-building network (we >sell internet access to other businesses in the building and we'd rather >route than switch netween segments) and I would like to do it with FreeBSD. >All of the routing will be through ethernet interfaces. > >Since the number is PCI/ISA slots in motherboards are limited, I was >wondering if anyone had seen any ethernet cards (10 or 10/100) that had >multiple independant ethernet ports on a single PCI or ISA card that was >compatilble with FreeBSD. > >Any help would be appreciated. > >Thanks! > >-Kitt > >Connecticom, Inc. >Internet Services for Business > (web hosting & programming) >(716) 546-3510 >http://www.connecticom.com > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Aug 6 14:33:26 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA10798 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 14:33:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from jupiter.connecticom.com (jupiter.connecticom.com [209.3.110.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA10611 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 14:32:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kitt@connecticom.com) Received: from [209.3.110.25] (orion.connecticom.com [209.3.110.25]) by jupiter.connecticom.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id RAA04809; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 17:30:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Sender: sysadmin@mail.connecticom.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <008701bdc180$c5a76ae0$f3d396ce@ivy.ezo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 17:31:42 -0400 To: "Jim Flowers" From: Kitt Diebold Subject: Re: ethernet cards... Cc: Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I want to provide a physical seperation between each company's internal network and my network (and thus the internet). Each ethernet connection goes off to a different company's internal network, where they do their day-to-day business. By routing, I will only be moving IP packets bound for their network, (and outbound packets) and not their general traffic, appletalk, netbios (I'll block those ports), etc. I don't see how I could get this functionality by using a hub. Also, by using multiple ethernet cards, I figure we can do 'value added' features by doing NAT for customers that don't want to be directly connected. >Kitt, >Why not just use an Ethernet hub for the physical connections to your client >computers and then use ipfw with the router software in your fbsd box to set >up a logical connection to each client gateway. Tough to beat an 8-port hub >for cost and you don't care much about speed (relatively) delivering the >Internet. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Kitt Diebold >To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG >Date: Thursday, August 06, 1998 5:14 PM >Subject: ethernet cards... > > >>I am going to set up an inexpensive router for an in-building network (we >>sell internet access to other businesses in the building and we'd rather >>route than switch netween segments) and I would like to do it with FreeBSD. >>All of the routing will be through ethernet interfaces. >> >>Since the number is PCI/ISA slots in motherboards are limited, I was >>wondering if anyone had seen any ethernet cards (10 or 10/100) that had >>multiple independant ethernet ports on a single PCI or ISA card that was >>compatilble with FreeBSD. >> >>Any help would be appreciated. >> >>Thanks! >> >>-Kitt >> >>Connecticom, Inc. >>Internet Services for Business >> (web hosting & programming) >>(716) 546-3510 >>http://www.connecticom.com >> >> >> >>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >>with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message >> Connecticom, Inc. Internet Services for Business (web hosting & programming) (716) 546-3510 http://www.connecticom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Aug 6 15:17:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA19933 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 15:17:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from kosh.cococo.net (kosh.cococo.net [208.134.89.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA19928 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 15:17:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kosh@kosh.cococo.net) Received: from localhost (kosh@localhost) by kosh.cococo.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id SAA23369; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 18:17:08 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 Aug 1998 18:17:08 -0400 (EDT) From: "Kelley L." To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG cc: chrw Subject: Re: pop3/tcp server failing (looping) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, spork wrote: > In inetd.conf, just change "nowait" to "nowait.100" or however many > connections/minute you need... It's in the man page somewhere. > > Charles > Or in the case of cucipop, you can run it standalone, it doesn't need to be run via inetd... later Kelley To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Aug 6 20:05:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA09984 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 20:05:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gate.gateway.net.hk (home.gateway.net.hk [202.76.19.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id UAA09973 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 1998 20:05:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmf@gate.gateway.net.hk) Received: (qmail 10836 invoked by uid 653); 7 Aug 1998 03:04:47 -0000 Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:04:47 +0800 (CST) From: Bo Fussing To: Kitt Diebold cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ethernet cards... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Kitt, Try znyx cards they come in 4 port flavours and have drivers in FreeBSD. http://www.znyx.com/ Bo On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, Kitt Diebold wrote: > I am going to set up an inexpensive router for an in-building network (we > sell internet access to other businesses in the building and we'd rather > route than switch netween segments) and I would like to do it with FreeBSD. > All of the routing will be through ethernet interfaces. > > Since the number is PCI/ISA slots in motherboards are limited, I was > wondering if anyone had seen any ethernet cards (10 or 10/100) that had > multiple independant ethernet ports on a single PCI or ISA card that was > compatilble with FreeBSD. > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks! > > -Kitt > > Connecticom, Inc. > Internet Services for Business > (web hosting & programming) > (716) 546-3510 > http://www.connecticom.com > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Aug 7 00:20:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA13895 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 00:20:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from super-g.inch.com (super-g.com [207.240.140.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA13810 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 00:20:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from spork@super-g.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by super-g.inch.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id DAA11064; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 03:19:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1998 03:19:53 -0400 (EDT) From: spork X-Sender: spork@super-g.inch.com To: Mike Jenkins cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, shredder@hack.babel.dk Subject: Re: pop3/tcp server failing (looping) In-Reply-To: <199808061238.HAA12408@carp.gbr.epa.gov> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 6 Aug 1998, Mike Jenkins wrote: > At first I thought Charles was talking about Linux (and he was in syntax) > but the FreeBSD inetd(8) manual page shows: Nah, I was just talking about 2.1-something, I had no idea the syntax had changed, our pop server still runs 2.1.7.1 and we have enought people popping to trigger the "looping..." message. I'm glad you pointed this out, or I'd be scratching my head for quite some time when we upgrade... Charles > > {wait|nowait}[/max-child[/max-connections-per-ip-per-minute]] > > The maximum number of outstanding child processes (or ``threads'') for a > ``nowait'' service may be explicitly specified by appending a ``/'' fol- > lowed by the number to the ``nowait'' keyword. Normally (or if a value of > zero is specified) there is no maximum. Otherwise, once the maximum is > reached, further connection attempts will be queued up until an existing > child process exits. This also works in the case of ``wait'' mode, al- > though a value other than one (the default) might not make sense in some > cases. You can also specify the maximum number of connections per minute > for a given IP address by appending a ``/'' followed by the number to the > maximum number of outstanding child processes. Once the maximum is > reached, further conections from this IP address will be dropped until > the end of the minute. > > So the -R switch applies to all services but you can taylor individual > services with the nowait/max-child/rate field. This FreeBSD is good > stuff! > > Mike > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Aug 7 08:10:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA20093 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 08:10:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.intercom.com ([207.51.55.117]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA20087 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 08:10:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jason@intercom.com) Received: from intercom.com (shagalicious.com [206.98.165.250]) by mail.intercom.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id LAA02909; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:10:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <35CB18EE.3F185B1@intercom.com> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1998 11:10:38 -0400 From: "Jason J. Horton" X-Sender: "Jason J. Horton" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5b1 [en]C-NECCK (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bo Fussing CC: Kitt Diebold , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ethernet cards... References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Interesting cards... Does the FreeBSD driver work with the Znyx RAINcluster, and run Cisco Fast EtherChannel? That would be incredibly useful. -J Bo Fussing wrote: > > Kitt, > > Try znyx cards they come in 4 port flavours and have drivers in FreeBSD. > > http://www.znyx.com/ > > Bo > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Aug 7 09:36:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA02883 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 09:36:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from garbo.lodgenet.com (garbo.lodgenet.com [204.124.122.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA02756 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 09:36:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from johnp@lodgenet.com) Received: from milo.lodgenet.com (milo.lodgenet.com [10.0.122.42]) by garbo.lodgenet.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA01235; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:32:11 -0500 Received: from milo.lodgenet.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by milo.lodgenet.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA26021; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 11:33:47 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199808071633.LAA26021@milo.lodgenet.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0gamma 1/27/96 To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: johnp@vwebpage.com Subject: Virtual Server Reply-To: johnp@lodgenet.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1998 11:33:46 -0500 From: John Prince Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello to all.. I know this topic has come up before, however I am still unclear.. What would be the best method of implementing a virtual server, allowing multiple domains to have there own ``chrooted'' area, as well as admin to this area. Any help/suggestions are greatly appreciated. Thanks, --John Prince To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Aug 7 16:50:34 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA22791 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 16:50:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from amber.eaznet.com. ([216.19.20.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA22784 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 16:50:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eddie@eaznet.com) Received: from eaznet.com (admin.eaznet.com [216.19.20.16]) by amber.eaznet.com. (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA17783 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 16:53:02 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <35CB93BC.2CB480B3@eaznet.com> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1998 16:54:36 -0700 From: Eddie Fry X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: mail bouncing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org We are running 2.2.2 with Sendmail 8.8.7. We have a customer that wants to send mail to cableone.net and it keeps getting bounced. Cableone.net is able to send mail to us ok, but not vice-versa. If I telnet into their machine, works ok. Any ideas? cableone.net addresses are 24.116.0.0/16 Copy of returned e-mail: The original message was received at Fri, 7 Aug 1998 16:04:40 -0700 (MST) from admin.eaznet.com [216.19.20.16] ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- ----- Transcript of session follows ----- ... while talking to cb3.cableone.net.: >>> HELO amber.eaznet.com. <<< 501 Invalid Address 554 ... Service unavailable Reporting-MTA: dns; amber.eaznet.com. Received-From-MTA: DNS; admin.eaznet.com Arrival-Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1998 16:04:40 -0700 (MST) Final-Recipient: RFC822; ebilleter@cableone.net Action: failed Status: 5.5.0 Remote-MTA: DNS; cb3.cableone.net Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 501 Invalid Address Last-Attempt-Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1998 16:04:41 -0700 (MST) Subject: Test Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1998 16:06:16 -0700 From: Eddie Fry To: ebilleter@cableone.net Test -- Eddie Fry EAZNet Internet Services -- Eddie Fry EAZNet Internet Services To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Aug 7 18:21:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA05854 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 18:21:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA05849 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 18:21:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shovey@buffnet.net) Received: from buffnet11.buffnet.net (buffnet11.buffnet.net [205.246.19.55]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA07184; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 21:21:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1998 21:21:14 -0400 (EDT) From: Steve Hovey To: Eddie Fry cc: isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mail bouncing In-Reply-To: <35CB93BC.2CB480B3@eaznet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Looks to me like you dont have reverse name set up or set up correctly (in-addr.arpa) On Fri, 7 Aug 1998, Eddie Fry wrote: > We are running 2.2.2 with Sendmail 8.8.7. We have a customer that wants > to send mail to cableone.net and it keeps getting bounced. Cableone.net > is able to send mail to us ok, but not vice-versa. If I telnet into > their machine, works ok. Any ideas? > > cableone.net addresses are 24.116.0.0/16 > > Copy of returned e-mail: > > The original message was received at Fri, 7 Aug 1998 16:04:40 -0700 > (MST) > from admin.eaznet.com [216.19.20.16] > > ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- > > > ----- Transcript of session follows ----- > ... while talking to cb3.cableone.net.: > >>> HELO amber.eaznet.com. > <<< 501 Invalid Address > 554 ... Service unavailable > > > > > Reporting-MTA: dns; amber.eaznet.com. > Received-From-MTA: DNS; admin.eaznet.com > Arrival-Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1998 16:04:40 -0700 (MST) > > Final-Recipient: RFC822; ebilleter@cableone.net > Action: failed > Status: 5.5.0 > Remote-MTA: DNS; cb3.cableone.net > Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 501 Invalid Address > Last-Attempt-Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1998 16:04:41 -0700 (MST) > > > Subject: > Test > Date: > Fri, 07 Aug 1998 16:06:16 -0700 > From: > Eddie Fry > To: > ebilleter@cableone.net > > > > Test > > -- > Eddie Fry > EAZNet Internet Services > > > > > > -- > Eddie Fry > EAZNet Internet Services > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > ------------------------------------------------------------------ Steve Hovey Chief Network Administrator BuffNET More Than Just a Connection! ------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Aug 7 19:00:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA10954 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 19:00:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from postal.c-zone.net (postal.c-zone.net [207.211.22.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA10949 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 19:00:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from medlir@c-zone.net) Received: from localhost (medlir@localhost) by postal.c-zone.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id TAA20246 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 19:00:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from medlir@c-zone.net) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1998 19:00:40 -0700 (PDT) From: Dan Babb To: isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ftp install Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org i have a machine that i want to get online but our 2.2.5 cd doesn't want to be read from in the cdrom so i get errors everytime i try to install from that. i tried to do a ftp install of 2.2.6 from ftp.freebsd.org .. but i get an error there as well .. saying it is skipping the chunks .. is there an alternate server in the states that i can install from? or a better idea on what i should do? thanks. dan network administrator : computer zone internet hell is the possibility of sanity To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Aug 7 22:36:33 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA02982 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 22:36:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from Gatekeeper.Alameda.net (gatekeeper.Alameda.net [207.90.181.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA02973 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 22:36:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ulf@Gatekeeper.Alameda.net) Received: by Gatekeeper.Alameda.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id WAA08476; Fri, 7 Aug 1998 22:36:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <19980807223612.G18733@Alameda.net> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 1998 22:36:13 -0700 From: Ulf Zimmermann To: Dan Babb , isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ftp install Reply-To: ulf@Alameda.net References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: ; from Dan Babb on Fri, Aug 07, 1998 at 07:00:40PM -0700 Organization: Alameda Networks, Inc. X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.6-STABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Aug 07, 1998 at 07:00:40PM -0700, Dan Babb wrote: > > i have a machine that i want to get online but our 2.2.5 cd doesn't want > to be read from in the cdrom so i get errors everytime i try to install > from that. i tried to do a ftp install of 2.2.6 from ftp.freebsd.org .. > but i get an error there as well .. saying it is skipping the chunks .. > > is there an alternate server in the states that i can install from? or a > better idea on what i should do? First of all you should try 2.2.7. Then there are ftp2 to ftp5, all in the US. > > thanks. > > > dan > network administrator : computer zone internet > hell is the possibility of sanity > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message -- Regards, Ulf. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Ulf Zimmermann, 1525 Pacific Ave., Alameda, CA-94501, #: 510-769-2936 Alameda Networks, Inc. | http://www.Alameda.net | Fax#: 510-521-5073 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Aug 8 04:25:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA05528 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sat, 8 Aug 1998 04:25:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from tweetie.online.barbour-index.co.uk (tweetie-pipex.online.barbour-index.co.uk [194.129.192.48]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA05511 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 1998 04:25:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scot@planet-three.com) Received: from localhost (scot@localhost) by tweetie.online.barbour-index.co.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA01511; Sat, 8 Aug 1998 12:24:57 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from scot@planet-three.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tweetie.online.barbour-index.co.uk: scot owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 8 Aug 1998 12:24:57 +0100 (BST) From: Scot Elliott X-Sender: scot@tweetie.online.barbour-index.co.uk To: John Prince cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, johnp@vwebpage.com Subject: Re: Virtual Server In-Reply-To: <199808071633.LAA26021@milo.lodgenet.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I've been thinking about this recently too. My conclustion is that something like xinetd (see ports) which allows addresses to be bound to is the way to go. Run multiple xinetd processes, one for each domain - each one chrooted to the domain root. Make sure each service in each file only binds to the correct address. Then, telnet/ftp etc connections will also be restricted to that root. Comments anyone? Scot. On Fri, 7 Aug 1998, John Prince wrote: > Hello to all.. > I know this topic has come up before, however I am still unclear.. > > What would be the best method of implementing a virtual server, > allowing multiple domains to have there own ``chrooted'' area, as > well as admin to this area. > > Any help/suggestions are greatly appreciated. > Thanks, > --John Prince > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scot Elliott (scot@poptart.org, scot@cx) | Work: +44 (0)171 7046777 PGP fingerprint: FCAE9ED3A234FEB59F8C7F9DDD112D | Home: +44 (0)181 8961019 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Public key available by finger at: finger scot@poptart.org or at: http://www.poptart.org/pgpkey.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Aug 8 07:25:04 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA17677 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sat, 8 Aug 1998 07:25:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns0.iticom.net ([207.49.135.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA17670 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 1998 07:25:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trouble@webfyre.com) Received: from webfyre.com by ns0.iticom.net ; Sat, 08 Aug 1998 14:24:47 +000 Message-ID: <35CC6DA7.77E69973@webfyre.com> Date: Sat, 08 Aug 1998 10:24:23 -0500 From: "Security Mgr." Reply-To: trouble@webfyre.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2CAM-19980716-SNAP i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scot Elliott CC: John Prince , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, johnp@vwebpage.com Subject: Re: Virtual Server References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Scot Elliott wrote: > I've been thinking about this recently too. My conclustion is that > something like xinetd (see ports) which allows addresses to be bound to is > the way to go. Run multiple xinetd processes, one for each domain - each > one chrooted to the domain root. Make sure each service in each file only > binds to the correct address. Then, telnet/ftp etc connections will also > be restricted to that root. > > Comments anyone? > > Scot. > > On Fri, 7 Aug 1998, John Prince wrote: > > > Hello to all.. > > I know this topic has come up before, however I am still unclear.. > > > > What would be the best method of implementing a virtual server, > > allowing multiple domains to have there own ``chrooted'' area, as > > well as admin to this area. > > > > Any help/suggestions are greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > > --John Prince Ummmm WRONG........ although this setup would work, I have accomplished this with a simple modification to httpd, ftp, sendmail and pop. My server runs everything that pertains to a customer in a chrooted environment, this is done easily not by multiple xinetd.... ACK i have 1000 ips on a single box can you imaging 1000 xinetd sessions running, i think not.... !!! I can use deamons for everything but httpd, which runs out of xinetd using hosts.allow, or run all services from one xinetd. This does work quite nicely under linux and FreeBSD freebsd seems to be more stable though, bit more robust networking wise. If you want further information email me To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Aug 8 08:02:11 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA21400 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sat, 8 Aug 1998 08:02:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.sheltonbbs.com (mail.sheltonbbs.com [206.196.109.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA21394 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 1998 08:02:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bbsadmin@sheltonbbs.com) Received: from butch.sheltonbbs.com (butch.sheltonlink.com [206.196.122.12]) by mail.sheltonbbs.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id KAA22814 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 1998 10:01:47 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <002601bdc2dd$3cfcbfc0$0c7ac4ce@butch.sheltonbbs.com> Reply-To: "Butch Evans" From: "Butch Evans" To: Subject: Fw: Ghost Mail Date: Sat, 8 Aug 1998 10:00:01 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3115.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I sent this out a few days ago, and have had one response. Just after sending it out, my Frame-relay went down, and I suspect some mail may have been lost. At any rate, I thank you for any assistance you may offer. **************************************************************** ** Butch Evans ** Visit our WebSite at ** ** Shelton Internet, Inc ** http://www.sheltonbbs.com ** ** Network Operations ** SEMO's Premier ISP ** ** Malden, MO ** Low, Low Ad Rates!! ** ** 1-800-339-4803 ** 573-276-4803 ** **************************************************************** >I am beginning to see an odd problem on one of my machines. This is my mail >machine (dedicated server). What is happening is this...a client connects, >and their computer tells them "Receiving message 1 of 10" (or whatever >number they have). They do not get 10 messages in their "Inbox". They are >not filtering mail, so it is not a client thing. The problem is pretty >widespread as well. It does not seem to be related to a particularly busy >time, either. I noticed once (a while back) that I was getting "too many >open files" errors in the log files, so I increased the "maxusers" to 50 and >re-compiled the kernel. Still no help...the file error has disappeared, >though. I am stumped. Here are the stats: >HARDWARE: >PII 266 with 128MB Ram and about 5 GB diskspace available in /var > >SOFTWARE: >FreeBSD 2.2.6 with aforementioned mods to kernel >Qpopper 2.53 (vanilla compile for FreeBSD) > >Thanks for any assistance. I am not sure what else to include here, as I >have exhausted my limited knowledge on this one. > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Aug 8 11:41:59 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA10895 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sat, 8 Aug 1998 11:41:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.craxx.com (craxx.com [195.108.198.119]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA10890 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 1998 11:41:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lva@dds.nl) Received: from uptight (classless.student.utwente.nl [130.89.230.96]) by mail.craxx.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with SMTP id UAA30106; Sat, 8 Aug 1998 20:41:34 +0200 From: "laurens van alphen" To: "Jason J. Horton" Cc: Subject: RE: ethernet cards... Date: Sat, 8 Aug 1998 20:41:27 +0200 Message-ID: <001201bdc2fc$268cc9f0$0a00a8c0@uptight.student.utwente.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 In-Reply-To: <35CB18EE.3F185B1@intercom.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Jason, This is a quote from a recent reply i got from Znyx: "... Our ZX346 four-channel 10/100 mbps would work using freebsd. The ZX314 and the ZX342 adapters we no longer manufacture. You may visit our web site to get more product information (www.znyx.com)..." Cheers, -- laurens van alphen craxx e-consultants alphen@craxx.com http://craxx.com/ -----Original Message----- Interesting cards... Does the FreeBSD driver work with the Znyx RAINcluster, and run Cisco Fast EtherChannel? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Aug 8 16:39:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA08813 for freebsd-isp-outgoing; Sat, 8 Aug 1998 16:39:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bamboo.tropinet.com (bamboo.tropinet.com [203.61.202.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA08755 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 1998 16:39:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nigel@tropinet.com) Received: from coco.tropinet.com (coco.tropinet.com [203.61.202.125]) by bamboo.tropinet.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA03973; Sun, 9 Aug 1998 09:37:53 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19980809093634.00831420@bamboo.tropinet.com> X-Sender: nigel@bamboo.tropinet.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Sun, 09 Aug 1998 09:36:34 +1000 To: Scot Elliott , John Prince From: Nigel Gorry Subject: Re: Virtual Server Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, johnp@vwebpage.com In-Reply-To: References: <199808071633.LAA26021@milo.lodgenet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 12:24 8/08/98 +0100, Scot Elliott wrote: >I've been thinking about this recently too. My conclustion is that >something like xinetd (see ports) which allows addresses to be bound to is >the way to go. Run multiple xinetd processes, one for each domain - each >one chrooted to the domain root. Make sure each service in each file only >binds to the correct address. Then, telnet/ftp etc connections will also >be restricted to that root. the standard inetd has the -a option which allow it to be bound to a certain address... that what I use for virtual POP servers Nigel Gorry Systems Administrator http://www.tropinet.com Radio 4KZ, Kool-FM and Zed.Net ISP http://www.znet.net.au To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message