From owner-freebsd-net Sun May 31 02:20:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA26586 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 31 May 1998 02:20:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA26545 for ; Sun, 31 May 1998 02:20:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with UUCP id LAA10816; Sun, 31 May 1998 11:15:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA08387; Sun, 31 May 1998 10:59:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Message-ID: <19980531105922.A7957@klemm.gtn.com> Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 10:59:22 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: John Hay , Philippe Regnauld Cc: andre@pipeline.ch, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: patches for fast forwarding (with kernel option & sysctl) References: <19980520090624.57083@deepo.prosa.dk> <199805200812.KAA07728@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <199805200812.KAA07728@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za>; from John Hay on Wed, May 20, 1998 at 10:12:51AM +0200 X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, May 20, 1998 at 10:12:51AM +0200, John Hay wrote: > > > > > > I'm thinking about using the new Zebra BGP daemon together with > > > > Where does one find that ? > > www.zebra.org Will try to make a port ... -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun May 31 04:39:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA13437 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 31 May 1998 04:39:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA13406 for ; Sun, 31 May 1998 04:39:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with UUCP id NAA15926; Sun, 31 May 1998 13:30:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA28220; Sun, 31 May 1998 13:19:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Message-ID: <19980531131940.A27797@klemm.gtn.com> Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 13:19:40 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: John Hay , Philippe Regnauld Cc: andre@pipeline.ch, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: patches for fast forwarding (with kernel option & sysctl) References: <19980520090624.57083@deepo.prosa.dk> <199805200812.KAA07728@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> <19980531105922.A7957@klemm.gtn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <19980531105922.A7957@klemm.gtn.com>; from Andreas Klemm on Sun, May 31, 1998 at 10:59:22AM +0200 X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, May 31, 1998 at 10:59:22AM +0200, Andreas Klemm wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 1998 at 10:12:51AM +0200, John Hay wrote: > > > > > > > > I'm thinking about using the new Zebra BGP daemon together with > > > > > > Where does one find that ? > > > > www.zebra.org > > Will try to make a port ... Done and added new port numbers to /etc/services in -current and -stable branch, since this router will be certainly another big step forward to use FreeBSD as an internet router. Another good point is, that zebra is IPv6 aware and supports: - FreeBSD with INRIA - FreeBSD with Hydrangea which is KAME now... -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun May 31 05:10:16 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA16497 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 31 May 1998 05:10:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.ftf.dk (mail.ftf.dk [129.142.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA16367 for ; Sun, 31 May 1998 05:09:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk) Received: from mail.prosa.dk ([192.168.100.2]) by mail.ftf.dk (8.8.8/8.8.8/gw-ftf-1.0) with ESMTP id OAA03767; Sun, 31 May 1998 14:09:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.ftf.dk: Host [192.168.100.2] claimed to be mail.prosa.dk Received: from deepo.prosa.dk (deepo.prosa.dk [192.168.100.10]) by mail.prosa.dk (8.8.5/8.8.5/prosa-1.1) with ESMTP id OAA17404; Sun, 31 May 1998 14:10:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from regnauld@localhost) by deepo.prosa.dk (8.8.8/8.8.5/prosa-1.1) id OAA07044; Sun, 31 May 1998 14:08:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <19980531140853.22371@deepo.prosa.dk> Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 14:08:53 +0200 From: Philippe Regnauld To: Andreas Klemm Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: patches for fast forwarding (with kernel option & sysctl) References: <19980520090624.57083@deepo.prosa.dk> <199805200812.KAA07728@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za> <19980531105922.A7957@klemm.gtn.com> <19980531131940.A27797@klemm.gtn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e In-Reply-To: <19980531131940.A27797@klemm.gtn.com>; from Andreas Klemm on Sun, May 31, 1998 at 01:19:40PM +0200 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE i386 Organization: PROSA Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Andreas Klemm writes: > > Another good point is, that zebra is IPv6 aware and supports: > - FreeBSD with INRIA Another reason not to wait :-P -- -[ Philippe Regnauld / sysadmin / regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk / +55.4N +11.3E ]- «Pluto placed his bad dog at the entrance of Hades to keep the dead IN and the living OUT! The archetypical corporate firewall?» - S. Kelly Bootle To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun May 31 05:31:10 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA19475 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 31 May 1998 05:31:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from coconut.itojun.org (root@coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA19469 for ; Sun, 31 May 1998 05:30:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from itojun@itojun.org) Received: from localhost (itojun@localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (8.8.8+3.0Wbeta12/3.6W) with ESMTP id VAA19383; Sun, 31 May 1998 21:30:29 +0900 (JST) To: Philippe Regnauld cc: Andreas Klemm , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: regnauld's message of Sun, 31 May 1998 14:08:53 +0200. <19980531140853.22371@deepo.prosa.dk> X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 Subject: Re: patches for fast forwarding (with kernel option & sysctl) From: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 21:30:29 +0900 Message-ID: <19377.896617829@coconut.itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >> Another good point is, that zebra is IPv6 aware and supports: >> - FreeBSD with INRIA > Another reason not to wait :-P KAME is also supported :-P itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun May 31 06:22:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA23309 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 31 May 1998 06:22:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from tokyogw.iij.ad.jp (firewall-user@tokyogw.iij.ad.jp [202.232.15.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA23296 for ; Sun, 31 May 1998 06:22:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kazu@Mew.org) Received: by tokyogw.iij.ad.jp; id WAA13809; Sun, 31 May 1998 22:22:19 +0900 (JST) Received: from mine.iij.ad.jp(192.168.4.209) by tokyogw.iij.ad.jp via smap (4.1) id xma013710; Sun, 31 May 98 22:21:32 +0900 Received: from localhost (localhost.iij.ad.jp [127.0.0.1]) by mine.iij.ad.jp (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA01512 for ; Sun, 31 May 1998 22:32:50 +0900 (JST) To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: patches for fast forwarding (with kernel option & sysctl) From: Kazu Yamamoto (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCOzNLXE9CSScbKEI=?=) In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 31 May 1998 21:30:29 +0900" <19377.896617829@coconut.itojun.org> References: <19377.896617829@coconut.itojun.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.93b36 on Emacs 19.28 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <19980531223250W.kazu@Mew.org> Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 22:32:50 +0900 X-Dispatcher: imput version 980522 Lines: 12 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org From: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh Subject: Re: patches for fast forwarding (with kernel option & sysctl) Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 21:30:29 +0900 > >> - FreeBSD with INRIA > > Another reason not to wait :-P > > KAME is also supported :-P And Ishiguro-san, the author of Zebra, is our friend. :p --Kazu, KAME Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun May 31 09:12:34 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA09315 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 31 May 1998 09:12:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from southampton.Cairnwood.com ([207.19.67.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA09295 for ; Sun, 31 May 1998 09:12:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DuncanP@Cairnwood.com) Received: by Southampton.Cairnwood.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) id ; Sun, 31 May 1998 12:11:42 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Pitcairn, Duncan" To: "'dhcp-client@fugue.com'" , "'freebsd-net@freebsd.org'" Subject: dhclient-script errors, FreeBSD and netBSD Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 12:11:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.1960.3) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The dhclient-script files for FreeBSD and NetBSD contained in dhcp-2_0b1pl0_tar.gz gave me two errors when dhclient could not find a dhcp server. The first error states line 175 expecting fi. I added an fi one line above the exit 0 (the last line in the script) and this solved the problem. The second error states that -w is not an option for ping. I removed the -w 1 in the ping command and this solved the problem. I do not know what the -w was for, maybe it is trying to do what a -i does (wait) in which case the value of 1 is the default in FreeBSD. Regards, Duncan Pitcairn CCC Alliance, Cairnwood Cooperative Southampton, Pennsylvania USA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun May 31 09:22:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA09985 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 31 May 1998 09:22:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from dancouger.matrix.iri.co.jp (dancouger.matrix.iri.co.jp [210.140.10.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA09936 for ; Sun, 31 May 1998 09:21:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from seirios@matrix.iri.co.jp) Received: from laysner.matrix.iri.co.jp (alias.home.grid.iri.co.jp [203.139.62.205]) by dancouger.matrix.iri.co.jp (8.8.7/3.6W-xabungle) with ESMTP id BAA12377; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 01:24:46 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by laysner.matrix.iri.co.jp (3.6W) with ESMTP id BAA00876; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 01:21:12 +0900 (JST) To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com Cc: jhay@mikom.csir.co.za, regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk, andre@pipeline.ch, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: seirios@matrix.iri.co.jp Subject: Re: patches for fast forwarding (with kernel option & sysctl) In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 31 May 1998 10:59:22 +0200" <19980531105922.A7957@klemm.gtn.com> References: <19980531105922.A7957@klemm.gtn.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.93b29 on XEmacs 20.4 (Emerald) X-fingerprint: FF 43 5D 13 72 0D DA B3 FC 2F 6A AC 58 C4 36 DD Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <19980601012111P.seirios@Matrix.IRI.Co.Jp> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 01:21:11 +0900 From: SeonMeyong HEO X-Dispatcher: imput version 980408 Lines: 18 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi. This is SeonMeyong HEO write. I'm one of zebra maintainer. > > > > I'm thinking about using the new Zebra BGP daemon together with > > > > > > Where does one find that ? > > > > www.zebra.org > > Will try to make a port ... Zebra is now testing alpha release. And current snapshot includes FreeBSD port. Zebra Release will soon, and after release, I send port package of zebra. HEO To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun May 31 10:11:07 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA14773 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 31 May 1998 10:11:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from InterJet.imagenation.com (mail.imagenation.com [206.103.36.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA14759 for ; Sun, 31 May 1998 10:10:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nicke@imagenation.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by InterJet.imagenation.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA10888; Sun, 31 May 1998 09:19:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199805311619.JAA10888@InterJet.imagenation.com> Received: from m152.imagenation.com(192.168.1.152), claiming to be "nicke" via SMTP by InterJet.imagenation.com, id smtpd010886; Sun May 31 16:19:24 1998 From: "Nick Ellson" To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 10:11:27 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: BSD as a PPP Server to Win 95? References: Your message of "Sat, 30 May 1998 16:54:06 PDT." <199805302301.QAA26947@InterJet.imagenation.com> In-reply-to: <901.896573535@time.cdrom.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01a) Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello Jordan, > Erm, no offense, but our tech support load is already more than > serious enough without the extra load that having to stay up to date > on what the variants are doing and all the extra user questions would > impose on us. My appologies, I didn't realize that you guys were this busy. I have been asking a series of questions on the misc@openbsd.org list as well and getting some help, but after reading some of your (freebsd) handbook data on this website it looked like you have covered more ground on this in the past. You have given me somethng to check already, I will examine which PPPD software Open is using and try to get docs on it. Thank you for your time. Nick -- Nick Ellson Customer Support Imagenation HTTP://www.imagenation.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun May 31 10:50:20 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA20098 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 31 May 1998 10:50:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA19924 for ; Sun, 31 May 1998 10:49:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dag-erli@ifi.uio.no) Received: from skejdbrimir.ifi.uio.no (skejdbrimir.ifi.uio.no [129.240.65.2]) by ifi.uio.no (8.8.8/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with SMTP id TAA28391; Sun, 31 May 1998 19:49:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (dag-erli@localhost) by skejdbrimir.ifi.uio.no ; Sun, 31 May 1998 17:49:31 GMT Mime-Version: 1.0 To: "Nick Ellson" Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Followup-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD as a PPP Server to Win 95? References: Your message of "Sat, 30 May 1998 16:54:06 PDT." <199805302301.QAA26947@InterJet.imagenation.com> <199805311619.JAA10888@InterJet.imagenation.com> Organization: University of Oslo, Department of Informatics X-url: http://www.stud.ifi.uio.no/~dag-erli/ X-email-address-1: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (for private or study-related mail) X-email-address-2: dagsm@hypnotech.no (for job-related mail) X-email-address-3: des@FreeBSD.org (for FreeBSD-related mail) X-email-address-4: finrod@ewox.org (for demoscene-related mail) X-disclaimer-1: I speak only for myself. The views expressed in this message X-disclaimer-2: are not those of the University of Oslo, the FreeBSD project, X-disclaimer-3: or any other organization or company to which I am or have at X-disclaimer-4: some time been affiliated. X-Stop-Spam: http://www.cauce.org/ From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) Date: 31 May 1998 19:49:23 +0200 In-Reply-To: "Nick Ellson"'s message of "Sun, 31 May 1998 10:11:27 -0700" Message-ID: Lines: 11 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Nick Ellson" writes: > My appologies, I didn't realize that you guys were this busy. I have been > asking a series of questions on the misc@openbsd.org list as well and > getting some help, but after reading some of your (freebsd) handbook data > on this website it looked like you have covered more ground on this in the > past. So if we're that much better, why don't you switch to FreeBSD? 8) -- Noone else has a .sig like this one. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun May 31 12:23:55 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA03379 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 31 May 1998 12:23:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from news1.gtn.com (news1.gtn.com [192.109.159.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA03248 for ; Sun, 31 May 1998 12:23:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by news1.gtn.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with UUCP id VAA02022; Sun, 31 May 1998 21:15:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA20994; Sun, 31 May 1998 20:11:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Message-ID: <19980531201124.A20986@klemm.gtn.com> Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 20:11:24 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: SeonMeyong HEO Cc: jhay@mikom.csir.co.za, regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk, andre@pipeline.ch, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: patches for fast forwarding (with kernel option & sysctl) References: <19980531105922.A7957@klemm.gtn.com> <19980601012111P.seirios@Matrix.IRI.Co.Jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <19980601012111P.seirios@Matrix.IRI.Co.Jp>; from SeonMeyong HEO on Mon, Jun 01, 1998 at 01:21:11AM +0900 X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Jun 01, 1998 at 01:21:11AM +0900, SeonMeyong HEO wrote: > > Zebra is now testing alpha release. > And current snapshot includes FreeBSD port. > > Zebra Release will soon, and after release, I send port package of > zebra. It's already finished ;-) This is how internet works ... fast ;-) -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun May 31 13:30:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA14556 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 31 May 1998 13:30:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from toccata.fugue.com (toccata.fugue.com [204.152.188.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA14330 for ; Sun, 31 May 1998 13:29:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mellon@andare.fugue.com) Received: from andare.fugue.com (andare.fugue.com [204.152.188.69]) by toccata.fugue.com (8.8.8/8.6.11) with ESMTP id NAA01933; Sun, 31 May 1998 13:28:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by andare.fugue.com (8.8.8/8.6.11) with SMTP id NAA13899; Sun, 31 May 1998 13:28:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199805312028.NAA13899@andare.fugue.com> To: "Pitcairn, Duncan" cc: "'dhcp-client@fugue.com'" , "'freebsd-net@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: Move a value from dhcp client on interface to dhcp server on othe r interface In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 30 May 1998 12:00:18 EDT." Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 13:28:28 -0700 From: Ted Lemon Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org You're going to have to hack /etc/dhclient-script to achieve the result you want. Keep a backup, because when you install new versions of the Internet Software Consortium DHCP distribution, this file will be overwritten. In 3.0, I'll try to remember to put some code into the client scripts to include an /etc/dhclient-script.local so that you don't have to keep doing this. _MelloN_ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun May 31 20:11:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA15902 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 31 May 1998 20:11:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from Altitude.CAM.ORG (Altitude.CAM.ORG [198.168.100.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA15890 for ; Sun, 31 May 1998 20:11:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from intmktg@cam.org) Received: from cam.org (here@Dialup-524.HIP.CAM.ORG [199.84.45.19]) by Altitude.CAM.ORG (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id XAA01595 for ; Sun, 31 May 1998 23:11:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <35721ACA.A51B7BD4@cam.org> Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 23:06:50 -0400 From: Claude Tardif X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Unknown abbreviations Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, There are a few abbreviations in the network protocols for which I don't know the meaning: softc (in net/if_slvar.h or net/if_sl.c) protosw (in netinet/protosw.h) Thanks for the help, Marc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun May 31 21:06:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA23014 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 31 May 1998 21:06:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from shell.futuresouth.com (shell.futuresouth.com [198.78.58.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA23006 for ; Sun, 31 May 1998 21:06:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tim@shell.futuresouth.com) Received: (from tim@localhost) by shell.futuresouth.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA17410; Sun, 31 May 1998 23:06:41 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <19980531230640.52576@futuresouth.com> Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 23:06:40 -0500 From: Tim Tsai To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: router performance Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Can I expect a FreeBSD-based router (say, Pentium Pro 180 with 64-128megs of RAM) to do the following reasonably well? 1) Route 2-4 T1's worth of traffic (judging from the recent fastforward thread I don't think this is a problem) 2) run BGP 3) do *extensive* inbound packet filtering (anti-spoofing, no broadcasts, etc.). 4) talk to the rest of the LAN through an ethernet interface Our Cisco 3640 with a Mips R4700/100Mhz is choking routinely with two T1's during periods of DoS attacks. It's quite capable of routing the traffic but the packet filtering is eating up all the CPU. Throw in ip accounting (which is only needed *during* an attack) and you can forget about any response. Thanks, Tim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun May 31 21:58:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA29974 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 31 May 1998 21:58:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cerebus.nectar.com (cerebus.nectar.com [204.27.67.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA29892 for ; Sun, 31 May 1998 21:58:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@cerebus.nectar.com) Received: from cerebus.nectar.com (localhost.communique.net [127.0.0.1]) by cerebus.nectar.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA27364; Sun, 31 May 1998 23:58:02 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199806010458.XAA27364@cerebus.nectar.com> X-PGP-RSAfprint: 00 F9 E6 A2 C5 4D 0A 76 26 8B 8B 57 73 D0 DE EE X-PGP-RSAkey: http://pgp.ai.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x094724A9 From: Jacques Vidrine In-reply-to: <35721ACA.A51B7BD4@cam.org> References: <35721ACA.A51B7BD4@cam.org> Subject: Re: Unknown abbreviations To: Claude Tardif cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 23:58:02 -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- protosw = protocol switch structure softc = (I don't know, but would like to) Jacques Vidrine On 31 May 1998 at 23:06, Claude Tardif wrote: > Hello, > There are a few abbreviations in the network protocols for which I don't > know the meaning: > softc (in net/if_slvar.h or net/if_sl.c) > protosw (in netinet/protosw.h) > Thanks for the help, > Marc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNXI02TeRhT8JRySpAQG/xQP9EfYKxXka2Wsy9cJpu8zax3IxMchUp1Yj fNYVBfhcX7Ktt6xYm6w1Xk5jVxofoicgfF4DM4DE/u7k1mXz2VoIoiJYSf+HFi5m 1ZR/gpRorVcgbElI7UgzlhHxp4JJg9ha2pzi1u5BIRPXB4OFafW0PFSERn3Nq2k7 i5ujkYjSOfg= =LWX4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 02:57:29 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA06067 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 02:57:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from arthur.axion.bt.co.uk (arthur.axion.bt.co.uk [132.146.5.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA06061 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 02:57:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from graeme.brown@bt-sys.bt.co.uk) Received: from rambo (actually rambo.futures.bt.co.uk) by arthur.axion.bt.co.uk (PP) with SMTP; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 10:56:31 +0100 Received: from maczebedee (actually macsmtp) by rambo with SMTP (PP); Mon, 1 Jun 1998 10:51:45 +0100 Message-ID: Date: 1 Jun 1998 10:50:31 +0100 From: Graeme Brown Subject: My fxp troubles under FreeBSD 2.2.6 To: David Greenman Cc: "FreeBSD-Net (FreeBSD.Org) List" X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP for Quarterdeck Mail; Version 4.0.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org David I looked a little into the FreeBSD 2.2.6 kernel source code under /usr/src/sys/pci at function pci_map_mem() in file pci.c /*----------------------------------------------------------------------- ** ** Map device into virtual and physical space ** ** Actually the device should have been mapped by the bios. ** This function only reads and verifies the value. ** ** PCI-Specification: 6.2.5.1: address maps ** **----------------------------------------------------------------------- */ int pci_map_mem (pcici_t tag, u_long reg, vm_offset_t* va, vm_offset_t* pa) { struct pcicb *link = pcicb; unsigned data ,paddr; vm_size_t psize, poffs; vm_offset_t vaddr; /* ** sanity check */ if (reg < PCI_MAP_REG_START || reg >= PCI_MAP_REG_END || (reg & 3)) { printf ("pci_map_mem failed: bad register=0x%x\n", (unsigned)reg); return (0); }; /* ** save old mapping, get size and type of memory ** ** type is in the lowest four bits. ** If device requires 2^n bytes, the next ** n-4 bits are read as 0. */ paddr = pci_conf_read (tag, reg) & PCI_MAP_MEMORY_ADDRESS_MASK; pci_conf_write (tag, reg, 0xfffffffful); data = pci_conf_read (tag, reg); pci_conf_write (tag, reg, paddr); /* ** check the type */ if (!((data & PCI_MAP_MEMORY_TYPE_MASK) == PCI_MAP_MEMORY_TYPE_32BIT_1M && (paddr & ~0xfffff) == 0) && (data & PCI_MAP_MEMORY_TYPE_MASK) != PCI_MAP_MEMORY_TYPE_32BIT){ printf ("pci_map_mem failed: bad memory type=0x%x\n", (unsigned) data); return (0); }; /* ** get the size. */ psize = -(data & PCI_MAP_MEMORY_ADDRESS_MASK); if (!paddr || paddr == PCI_MAP_MEMORY_ADDRESS_MASK) { paddr = pci_memalloc (pcicb, 0, psize); if (!paddr) { printf ("pci_map_mem: not configured by bios.\n"); return (0); }; pci_register_memory (pcicb, paddr, paddr+psize-1); }; if (paddr < pcicb->pcicb_membase || paddr + psize - 1 > pcicb->pcicb_memlimit) { printf ("pci_map_mem failed: device's memrange 0x%x-0x%x is " "incompatible with its bridge's memrange 0x%x-0x%x\n", (unsigned) paddr, (unsigned) (paddr + psize - 1), (unsigned) pcicb->pcicb_membase, (unsigned) pcicb->pcicb_memlimit); /* return (0);*/ /* ACHTUNG: Ist der Code richtig, wenn eine PCI-PCI-Bridge fuer * die PCI-Slots verwendet wird, aber die Onboard-Devices direkt * an der CPU-PCI-Bridge haengen (Siehe Compaq Prolinea Problem) ??? */ } pci_conf_write (tag, reg, paddr); /* ** Truncate paddr to page boundary. ** (Or does pmap_mapdev the job?) */ poffs = paddr - trunc_page (paddr); vaddr = (vm_offset_t) pmap_mapdev (paddr-poffs, psize+poffs); if (!vaddr) return (0); vaddr += poffs; #ifndef PCI_QUIET /* ** display values. */ if (bootverbose) printf ("\treg%d: virtual=0x%lx physical=0x%lx size=0x%lx\n", (unsigned) reg, (u_long)vaddr, (u_long)paddr, (u_long)psize); #endif /* ** set the configuration register and ** return the address to the driver ** Make sure to enable each upstream bridge ** so memory and DMA can go all the way. */ for (;;) { data = pci_conf_read (tag, PCI_COMMAND_STATUS_REG) & 0xffff; data |= PCI_COMMAND_MEM_ENABLE | PCI_COMMAND_MASTER_ENABLE; (void) pci_conf_write(tag, PCI_COMMAND_STATUS_REG, data); if ((link = link->pcicb_up) == NULL) break; tag = link->pcicb_bridge; } *va = vaddr; *pa = paddr; return (1); } The error message being triggered by the test if (paddr < pcicb->pcicb_membase || paddr + psize - 1 > pcicb->pcicb_memlimit) { printf ("pci_map_mem failed: device's memrange 0x%x-0x%x is " "incompatible with its bridge's memrange 0x%x-0x%x\n", (unsigned) paddr, (unsigned) (paddr + psize - 1), (unsigned) pcicb->pcicb_membase, (unsigned) pcicb->pcicb_memlimit); /* return (0);*/ /* ACHTUNG: Ist der Code richtig, wenn eine PCI-PCI-Bridge fuer * die PCI-Slots verwendet wird, aber die Onboard-Devices direkt * an der CPU-PCI-Bridge haengen (Siehe Compaq Prolinea Problem) ??? */ I notice the comment in German translates (if I remenber my high-school German) as ATTENTION: Is the code correct if a PCI-PCI-Bridge for the PCI slots is changed but the Onboard-Devices directly on the CPU-PCI bridge hang (as in "get hung-up" or as in "are connected-to" ??) ( See Compaq Prolinea Problem) ??? I notice the author of pci.c is Wolfgang Stanglmeier. Is he contactable via email ? Who is/are the PCI bus specialist(s) within the FreeBSD Org ? Can we have his/their comments on my problem ? TIA Graeme N Brown BT Laboratories, UK email: graeme.brown@bt-sys.bt.co.uk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 03:20:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA09184 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 03:20:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA09173 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 03:20:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA18856; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 03:19:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: Graeme Brown cc: David Greenman , "FreeBSD-Net (FreeBSD.Org) List" Subject: Re: My fxp troubles under FreeBSD 2.2.6 In-reply-to: Your message of "01 Jun 1998 10:50:31 BST." Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 03:19:17 -0700 Message-ID: <18851.896696357@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > /* ACHTUNG: Ist der Code richtig, wenn eine PCI-PCI-Bridge fuer > * die PCI-Slots verwendet wird, aber die Onboard-Devices direkt > * an der CPU-PCI-Bridge haengen (Siehe Compaq Prolinea Problem) ??? > */ > > I notice the comment in German translates (if I remenber my high-school > German) as "Attention: Is the code correct if a PCI-PCI bridge is used for the PCI slots but the onboard devices are directly hanging off a CPU-PCI bridge (see problem with Compaq Prolinea) ???" :-) > I notice the author of pci.c is Wolfgang Stanglmeier. Is he contactable wolf@freebsd.org. > via email ? Who is/are the PCI bus specialist(s) within the FreeBSD Org ? Ca That would be Stefan Esser: se@freebsd.org. On the chance that he doesn't subscribe to the rather new freebsd-net mailing list, you might want to contact him directly (and you won't need to translate any German comments for him :-). - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 03:21:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA09249 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 03:21:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA09242 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 03:21:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA10099; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 03:16:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199806011016.DAA10099@implode.root.com> To: Graeme Brown cc: "FreeBSD-Net (FreeBSD.Org) List" Subject: Re: My fxp troubles under FreeBSD 2.2.6 In-reply-to: Your message of "01 Jun 1998 10:50:31 BST." From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 03:16:39 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >The error message being triggered by the test > >if (paddr < pcicb->pcicb_membase || > paddr + psize - 1 > pcicb->pcicb_memlimit) { > printf ("pci_map_mem failed: device's memrange 0x%x-0x%x is " > "incompatible with its bridge's memrange 0x%x-0x%x\n", > (unsigned) paddr, > (unsigned) (paddr + psize - 1), > (unsigned) pcicb->pcicb_membase, > (unsigned) pcicb->pcicb_memlimit); >/* return (0);*/ >/* ACHTUNG: Ist der Code richtig, wenn eine PCI-PCI-Bridge fuer > * die PCI-Slots verwendet wird, aber die Onboard-Devices direkt > * an der CPU-PCI-Bridge haengen (Siehe Compaq Prolinea Problem) ??? > */ > >I notice the comment in German translates (if I remenber my high-school >German) as > >ATTENTION: Is the code correct if a PCI-PCI-Bridge for the PCI slots >is changed but the Onboard-Devices directly on the CPU-PCI bridge >hang (as in "get hung-up" or as in "are connected-to" ??) ( See Compaq >Prolinea Problem) ??? > >I notice the author of pci.c is Wolfgang Stanglmeier. Is he contactable >via email ? Who is/are the PCI bus specialist(s) within the FreeBSD Org ? Can >we have his/their comments on my problem ? Our PCI expert is Stefan Esser . He and Wolfgang wrote the generic PCI support that appears in FreeBSD. I should have mentioned that earlier - sorry about that. Please do contact him and provide the relevant info (hardware config, and the dmesg output - especially the results of the above printf). -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 06:38:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA06530 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 06:38:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mx.iki.rssi.ru (mx.iki.rssi.ru [193.232.212.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA05899 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 06:34:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from richi@tdis.gctc.rssi.ru) Received: from tdis.gctc.rssi.ru (tdis.gctc.rssi.ru [193.232.26.70]) by mx.iki.rssi.ru (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA13746 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 17:34:19 +0500 (MSD) Received: from tdis by tdis.gctc.rssi.ru (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA13457; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 17:32:05 -0300 Message-Id: <35730FC4.3EDCD3C5@tdis.gctc.rssi.ru> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 17:32:05 -0300 From: "Andrew A.Karjagin" Organization: Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.4 sun4m) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: DHCPD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, people! I install FreeBSD dialup-server with 8 dialin channels and want to use DHCP-daemon at the server. How can I do it correctly? FreeBSD-server is on the local net 192.168.0.0, server-IP=192.168.0.31, defaultrouter="192.168.0.1", router="YES" with -q option, gateway="YES", kernel was compiled with 8 tun and 8 ppp pseudo-devices, there is a range of IP for dialin service from 192.168.0.40 to 192.168.0.50 (I write it in dhcpd.conf), I get the following picture by "ifconfig -au": ep0: flags=863 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.0.31 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 ether 8:0:22:13:18:fd tun0: flags=1245 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.0.31 ---> 192.168.0.40 netmask ffffff00 tun1: ... ....... tun7: ... I have do all as written at HandBook, but when I start DHCP-daemon, it answer that "interfaces are not configured" and exiting. Thank you for help. ____________________________________________________ Best regards Andrew A.Karjagin Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center, Star town, Russia ICQ# = 4744622 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 07:53:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA18685 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 07:53:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (spinner.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA18661; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 07:53:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.netplex.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8/Spinner) with ESMTP id WAA09295; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 22:52:31 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@spinner.netplex.com.au) Message-Id: <199806011452.WAA09295@spinner.netplex.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Kazu Yamamoto (=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCOzNLXE9CSScbKEI=?=) cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: patches for fast forwarding (with kernel option & sysctl) In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 31 May 1998 22:32:50 +0900." <19980531223250W.kazu@Mew.org> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 22:52:23 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Kazu Yamamoto wrote: > > >> - FreeBSD with INRIA > > > Another reason not to wait :-P > > > > KAME is also supported :-P > > And Ishiguro-san, the author of Zebra, is our friend. :p > > --Kazu, KAME Project I'm beginning to suspect that the only sane outcome from this will be if we give the INRIA and WIDE/KAME/whatever-this-week folks some high-powered duelling weapons for a fight to the death or something.... 1/2 :-) Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm Netplex Consulting To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 08:23:25 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA24149 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 08:23:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from kame200.kame.net (kame200.kame.net [203.178.141.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA23807 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 08:21:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kazu@kame.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.kame.net [127.0.0.1]) by kame200.kame.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA00677 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 00:20:59 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from kazu@kame.net) To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: the first release of KAME IPv6/IPsec package Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="--Next_Part(Tue_Jun__2_00:13:09_1998_601)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Kazu Yamamoto (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOzNLXE9CSScbKEI=?=) X-Mailer: Mew version 1.93b37 on Emacs 19.28 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA) Message-Id: <19980602002059D.kazu@kame.net> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 00:20:59 +0900 X-Dispatcher: imput version 980522 Lines: 72 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ----Next_Part(Tue_Jun__2_00:13:09_1998_601)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello IPv6 enthusiasts, "KAME Project" is a joint effort of Fujitsu Limited, Hitachi, Ltd., IIJ Research Laboratory, NEC Corporation, Toshiba Corporation, Yokogawa Digital Computer Corporation, and Yokogawa Electric Corporation to create IPv6/IPsec stacks. It started in April 1998 and will be a two-years project (possibly longer). The stack was originally called "Hydrangea" developed by v6 working group of WIDE Project. KAME project members are almost the same as the working group member, but we have chosen this project name along with stack name to emphasize the goal of this effort is different. We're now merging protocol stacks individually developed by each companies, into KAME which is based on Hydrangea. Currently, we target FreeBSD and BSD/OS but will probably adapt NetBSD, too. Like other BSD variants, this package is distributed the BSD "AS IS" style copyright. In short, FREE of charge but with NO warranty. You can use released packages for academic, research, and/or commercial purposes. We release a stable package every other month. This is the first stable release of KAME Project. "kame-980531-{fbsd226,bsdi300}-stable.tgz" contains IPv6 basic features, a lot of IPv6 applications(including TELNET, FTP, RLOGIN, SSH, Netscape), IPv6 routing daemons, IPv6 over p2p ATM, transport mode of IPsec, key exchange daemons, IPv4-IPv6 translator, DNS server which supports both IPv4 and IPv6, etc. Note: Cryptographic softwares are NOT under export control in Japan if distributed without any charge. But please note that your country may have import and/or use control for cryptographic softwares. Before you retrieve this package, please check your country's export/import policies before you retrieve package. If you are interested, please find a download page in following URL: http://www.kame.net For those who prefer FTP, we also enclose FTP external-body in MIME format. // KAME Project ----Next_Part(Tue_Jun__2_00:13:09_1998_601)-- Content-Type: Message/External-Body; access-type="anon-ftp"; name="kame-980531-fbsd226-stable.tgz"; directory="/pub/kame/stable/"; site="ftp.kame.net" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: Application/Octet-Stream Content-ID: <13682.50433.595@kame200.kame.net> ----Next_Part(Tue_Jun__2_00:13:09_1998_601)-- Content-Type: Message/External-Body; access-type="anon-ftp"; name="kame-980531-bsdi300-stable.tgz"; directory="/pub/kame/stable/"; site="ftp.kame.net" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: Application/Octet-Stream Content-ID: <13682.50433.600@kame200.kame.net> ----Next_Part(Tue_Jun__2_00:13:09_1998_601)---- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 09:54:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA11125 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 09:54:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vorbis.noc.easynet.net (qmailr@vorbis.noc.easynet.net [195.40.1.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA11097 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 09:54:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chrisy@vorbis.noc.easynet.net) Received: (qmail 26028 invoked by uid 1943); 1 Jun 1998 16:54:20 -0000 Message-ID: <19980601175420.15605@flix.net> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 17:54:20 +0100 From: Chrisy Luke To: Claude Tardif Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Unknown abbreviations References: <35721ACA.A51B7BD4@cam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: <35721ACA.A51B7BD4@cam.org>; from Claude Tardif on Sun, May 31, 1998 at 11:06:50PM -0400 Organization: The Flirble Internet Exchange X-URL: http://www.flix.net/ X-FTP: ftp://ftp.flirble.org/ Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Claude Tardif wrote (on Jun 01): > Hello, > There are a few abbreviations in the network protocols for which I don't > know the meaning: Buy a copy of TCP/IP Illustrated, Volume 2, by Wright and Stevens. ISBN 0-201-63354-X Chris. -- == chris@easynet.net, chrisy@flix.net, chrisy@flirble.org. == Head of Systems for Easynet Group PLC. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 11:15:34 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA27669 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 11:15:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA27592 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 11:14:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id SAA03543 for net@freebsd.org; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 18:35:36 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199806011635.SAA03543@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: new version of dummynet To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 18:35:35 +0200 (MET DST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org There is a new version of the dummynet code at http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ip_dummynet/ fixing a potential bug i introduced earlier by allowing backward jumps in the firewall code. I have also fixed a bug that prevented dummynet from working with the DIVERT option. cheers luigi -----------------------------+-------------------------------------- Luigi Rizzo | Dip. di Ingegneria dell'Informazione email: luigi@iet.unipi.it | Universita' di Pisa tel: +39-50-568533 | via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA (Italy) fax: +39-50-568522 | http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ _____________________________|______________________________________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 11:23:29 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA28958 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 11:23:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vorbis.noc.easynet.net (qmailr@vorbis.noc.easynet.net [195.40.1.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA28924 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 11:23:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chrisy@vorbis.noc.easynet.net) Received: (qmail 29533 invoked by uid 1943); 1 Jun 1998 18:23:02 -0000 Message-ID: <19980601192301.42902@flix.net> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 19:23:01 +0100 From: Chrisy Luke To: Jacques Vidrine Cc: Claude Tardif , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Unknown abbreviations References: <35721ACA.A51B7BD4@cam.org> <199806010458.XAA27364@cerebus.nectar.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: <199806010458.XAA27364@cerebus.nectar.com>; from Jacques Vidrine on Sun, May 31, 1998 at 11:58:02PM -0500 Organization: The Flirble Internet Exchange X-URL: http://www.flix.net/ X-FTP: ftp://ftp.flirble.org/ Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Claude Tardif wrote (on Jun 01): >> I do have TCP/IP Illustrated Vol.2, please indicate on which page I can find > the meaning for the softc and protosw abbreviations.Thanks, For protosw, the page opposite the inside-cover, right hand column and 5 down says "protosw...188". So look on page 188. :@) Jacques Vidrine wrote (on Jun 01): > softc = (I don't know, but would like to) As for softc, it's a generic name given to a structure that exists in almost every kernel driver. In the case of network devices they contain the state of the driver, more or less. The network code makes more use of the idea than most of the other drivers in the kernel. Note that struct ifnet points to it via a "void *if_softc" - because each device has it's own definition, but that each _softc also has a pointer back to it's ifnet. ifnet deals with the more uniforn details, like "device name" etc while softc has the more specific. For some idea, the le_softc is described on page 80. This is also listed inside the cover... :-) Chris. -- == chris@easynet.net, chrisy@flix.net, chrisy@flirble.org. == Head of Systems for Easynet Group PLC. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 11:37:58 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA01277 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 11:37:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from jlf0.jlf.es (h028189.nexo.es [195.235.28.189]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA01220 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 11:37:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jlfreniche@acm.org) Received: from acm.org (localhost.jlf.es [127.0.0.1]) by jlf0.jlf.es (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA00229 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 20:38:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jlfreniche@acm.org) Message-ID: <3572F515.F85A651@acm.org> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 20:38:13 +0200 From: "Juan L. Freniche" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD NET Subject: Questions again on T/TCP References: <3560B324.EE6EA57B@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I sent sometime ago the following message to this list, but nobody responded. Please, can anybody have a look and respond? Message repeated: This morning a FreeBSD security advise was corrected in the FreeBSD announce mail list, regarding a hole in the T/TCP implementation. It can be retrieve from ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/patches/SA-98:03/ The following modification to /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c was recommended: @@ -680,7 +680,9 @@ * - otherwise do a normal 3-way handshake. */ if ((to.to_flag & TOF_CC) != 0) { - if (taop->tao_cc != 0 && CC_GT(to.to_cc, taop->tao_cc)){ + if (((tp->t_flags & TF_NOPUSH) != 0) && + taop->tao_cc != 0 && CC_GT(to.to_cc, taop->tao_cc)){ + taop->tao_cc = to.to_cc; tp->t_state = TCPS_ESTABLISHED; I don't understand completely the proposed solution: Remember that the state is Listen and TF_NOPUSH was set (see the code below the label findpcb in tcp_input.c). A segment is received, it pass if SYN present and other filters are OK. When reaching the TAO test, the proposal expand the test with (tp->t_flags & TF_NOPUSH) != 0), which is always true! Can anybody tell me what I am missing? Second question: in tcp_input.c, when the clone socket is created, the clone connection is moved to Listen and TF_NOPUSH is set. However, if you have a look to the ttcp man page, it is recommended (SERVER SUPPORT, item list 1) that TCP_NOPUSH be set for the master connection, but this flag is already set for any clone! Even more, if you reset the flag for the master connection, it will have no effect in their clones. By the way, setting the flag for clone connections is not found in the Stevens book, vol. 3. -------------------------- E-Mail: jlfreniche@acm.org -------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 11:42:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA02120 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 11:42:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cerebus.nectar.com (cerebus.nectar.com [204.27.67.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA02112 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 11:42:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@cerebus.nectar.com) Received: from cerebus.nectar.com (localhost.communique.net [127.0.0.1]) by cerebus.nectar.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA01888; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 13:41:54 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199806011841.NAA01888@cerebus.nectar.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 X-PGP-RSAfprint: 00 F9 E6 A2 C5 4D 0A 76 26 8B 8B 57 73 D0 DE EE X-PGP-RSAkey: http://pgp.ai.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x094724A9 From: Jacques Vidrine In-reply-to: <19980601192301.42902@flix.net> References: <35721ACA.A51B7BD4@cam.org> <199806010458.XAA27364@cerebus.nectar.com> <19980601192301.42902@flix.net> Subject: Re: Unknown abbreviations To: Chrisy Luke cc: Claude Tardif , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 13:41:53 -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- I think the original poster was attempting to determine something of the etymology of ``protosw'' and ``softc''. Of course I can't read minds :-) though I like to pretend to sometimes :-) ``protosw'' is mneumonic for ``protocol switch'', as I pointed out previously. Does anyone know why ``softc'' structs are called ``softc'' ? I'm still curious. Jacques Vidrine On 1 June 1998 at 19:23, Chrisy Luke wrote: [snip] > Jacques Vidrine wrote (on Jun 01): > > softc = (I don't know, but would like to) > > As for softc, it's a generic name given to a structure that exists in > almost every kernel driver. [snip] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNXL18TeRhT8JRySpAQEpfAQAqq1HlvDFgjOmRHTbgHriXCgWTj+tLtkH F9YJQFulpxF+MFteQZ17WIm1FMuQg5elzjx1coImaTlOodbBQPE0TRVSEYOQ1Ahb gOzU3fxeg3S7QM9X6uqPEk1NpRkGpXXXBqQZiJylNoF6pgJFfSHKjNWAzCvi9PIw rjygWTpYy5g= =XlZu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 12:52:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA16246 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 12:52:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA16015 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 12:51:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from archie@whistle.com) Received: (from smap@localhost) by whistle.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id MAA06140; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 12:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bubba.whistle.com(207.76.205.7) by whistle.com via smap (V1.3) id sma006135; Mon Jun 1 12:50:58 1998 Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.8.7/8.6.12) id MAA02729; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 12:50:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <199806011950.MAA02729@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: Unknown abbreviations In-Reply-To: <199806011841.NAA01888@cerebus.nectar.com> from Jacques Vidrine at "Jun 1, 98 01:41:53 pm" To: n@nectar.com (Jacques Vidrine) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 12:50:58 -0700 (PDT) Cc: chrisy@flix.net, intmktg@cam.org, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Jacques Vidrine writes: > Does anyone know why ``softc'' structs are called > ``softc'' ? I'm still curious. Guess: "software copy" (as opposed to information on the chip) ? -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 12:55:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA17050 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 12:55:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gta.gta.com (gta.gta.com [199.120.225.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA16894 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 12:54:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from paul@gta.com) Message-Id: <199806012000.QAA14487@gta.gta.com> Received: forwarded by SMTP 1.6.0. Received: (from paul@localhost) by uno.gta.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id PAA27208 for freebsd-net@Freebsd.org; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 15:51:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 15:51:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Paul Emerson To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipv6 network addresses Newsgroups: freebsd.net Organization: Global Technology Associates, Inc. X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In article <13679.44784.627668.295652@silver.sms.fi> you wrote: : Matthew N. Dodd writes: : > On Fri, 29 May 1998, Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh wrote: : > > I believe people would like to get rid of NAT when v6 is deployed, : > > so there will be no private address, I believe... : > : > For the most part your belief would be correct however in a small number : > of cases I find NAT to be highly useful. : > : > I have a number of machines running at home which are not secured and : > should not be reachable via global addresses. In addition, I keep my : > Win95/NT/Netware boxes behind the NAT on general principle. : Repeat after me: NAT is not reason for not having : security. Additionally it breaks your IP telephone and other : bi-directional peer-to-peer applications. : Pete Repeat after me: All NAT solutions are not created equal. You can make an Internet telephone call through NAT/firewall our product. CU-SeeMe, RealAudio, and the list goes on. Transparent NAT is not a simple proposition but it can be done. -- Paul Emerson (paul@gta.com) Global Technology Associates, Inc. Tel. 407-380-0220 Fax. 407-380-6080 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 13:42:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA28965 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 13:42:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (spinner.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA28886 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 13:42:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.netplex.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8/Spinner) with ESMTP id EAA11209; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 04:42:15 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@spinner.netplex.com.au) Message-Id: <199806012042.EAA11209@spinner.netplex.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Juan L. Freniche" cc: FreeBSD NET Subject: Re: Questions again on T/TCP In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 01 Jun 1998 20:38:13 +0200." <3572F515.F85A651@acm.org> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 04:42:15 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Juan L. Freniche" wrote: > I sent sometime ago the following message to this list, but nobody > responded. Please, can anybody have a look and respond? > > Message repeated: > > This morning a FreeBSD security advise was corrected in the FreeBSD > announce mail list, regarding a hole in the T/TCP implementation. > It can be retrieve from > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/patches/SA-98:03/ > > The following modification to /usr/src/sys/netinet/tcp_input.c > was recommended: > > @@ -680,7 +680,9 @@ > * - otherwise do a normal 3-way handshake. > */ > if ((to.to_flag & TOF_CC) != 0) { > - if (taop->tao_cc != 0 && CC_GT(to.to_cc, > taop->tao_cc)){ > + if (((tp->t_flags & TF_NOPUSH) != 0) && > + taop->tao_cc != 0 && CC_GT(to.to_cc, > taop->tao_cc)){ > + > taop->tao_cc = to.to_cc; > tp->t_state = TCPS_ESTABLISHED; > > > I don't understand completely the proposed solution: > > Remember that the state is Listen and TF_NOPUSH was set (see the code > below > the label findpcb in tcp_input.c). A segment is received, it pass if SYN > present and other filters are OK. When reaching the TAO test, the > proposal expand the test with (tp->t_flags & TF_NOPUSH) != 0), which is > always true! TF_NOPUSH is *copied* from the listening socket. It's only present if the listener has explicitly enabled it. tp->t_flags |= tp0->t_flags & (TF_NOPUSH|TF_NOOPT); ie: only copy the TF_NOPUSH and TF_NOOPT flags from the listener to the clone. If they are not set on the master/listener, the clone does not get them. > Can anybody tell me what I am missing? > > Second question: in tcp_input.c, when the clone socket is created, the > clone > connection is moved to Listen and TF_NOPUSH is set. However, if you have > a look to the ttcp man page, it is recommended (SERVER SUPPORT, item > list 1) that TCP_NOPUSH be set for the master connection, but this flag > is already set for any clone! Even more, if you reset the flag for the > master connection, it will have no effect in their clones. See the above, setting TCP_NOPUSH via setsockopt() is what turns on the TF_ NOPUSH on the listener. The names are similar but the two are seperate things. > By the way, setting the flag for clone connections is not found in the > Stevens book, vol. 3. > > -------------------------- > E-Mail: jlfreniche@acm.org > -------------------------- > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm Netplex Consulting To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 13:45:59 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA29826 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 13:45:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (spinner.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA29648 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 13:45:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.netplex.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8/Spinner) with ESMTP id EAA11242; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 04:44:46 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@spinner.netplex.com.au) Message-Id: <199806012044.EAA11242@spinner.netplex.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Jacques Vidrine cc: Chrisy Luke , Claude Tardif , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Unknown abbreviations In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 01 Jun 1998 13:41:53 EST." <199806011841.NAA01888@cerebus.nectar.com> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 04:44:46 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Jacques Vidrine wrote: > I think the original poster was attempting to determine > something of the etymology of ``protosw'' and ``softc''. > Of course I can't read minds :-) though I like to pretend > to sometimes :-) > > ``protosw'' is mneumonic for ``protocol switch'', as I > pointed out previously. > > Does anyone know why ``softc'' structs are called > ``softc'' ? I'm still curious. "Soft Config" is what I seem to remember being told, it may or may not be accurate. It's the software part of the device driver state, as opposed to the hardware register state. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm Netplex Consulting To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 14:05:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA04751 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 14:05:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.ftf.dk (mail.ftf.dk [129.142.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA04634 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 14:05:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk) Received: from mail.prosa.dk ([192.168.100.2]) by mail.ftf.dk (8.8.8/8.8.8/gw-ftf-1.0) with ESMTP id XAA07080; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 23:04:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.ftf.dk: Host [192.168.100.2] claimed to be mail.prosa.dk Received: from deepo.prosa.dk (deepo.prosa.dk [192.168.100.10]) by mail.prosa.dk (8.8.5/8.8.5/prosa-1.1) with ESMTP id XAA19037; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 23:05:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from regnauld@localhost) by deepo.prosa.dk (8.8.8/8.8.5/prosa-1.1) id XAA06877; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 23:03:58 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <19980601230358.45593@deepo.prosa.dk> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 23:03:58 +0200 From: Philippe Regnauld To: "?$B;3KOBI'?(B" Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: patches for fast forwarding (with kernel option & sysctl) References: <19377.896617829@coconut.itojun.org> <19980531223250W.kazu@Mew.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e In-Reply-To: <19980531223250W.kazu@Mew.org>; from ?$B;3K\OBI'?(B on Sun, May 31, 1998 at 10:32:50PM +0900 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE i386 Organization: PROSA Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ?$B;3K\OBI'?(B writes: > > > > KAME is also supported :-P > > And Ishiguro-san, the author of Zebra, is our friend. :p Conspiracy! 8-) -- -[ Philippe Regnauld / sysadmin / regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk / +55.4N +11.3E ]- «Pluto placed his bad dog at the entrance of Hades to keep the dead IN and the living OUT! The archetypical corporate firewall?» - S. Kelly Bootle To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 14:54:35 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA17533 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 14:54:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from obie.softweyr.com ([204.68.178.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA17463 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 14:54:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@obie.softweyr.com) Received: (from wes@localhost) by obie.softweyr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA25827; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 15:54:05 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wes) From: Wes Peters Message-Id: <199806012154.PAA25827@obie.softweyr.com> Subject: Re: Unknown abbreviations In-Reply-To: <35721ACA.A51B7BD4@cam.org> from Claude Tardif at "May 31, 98 11:06:50 pm" To: intmktg@cam.org (Claude Tardif) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 15:54:05 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Hello, > There are a few abbreviations in the network protocols for which I don't > know the meaning: > softc (in net/if_slvar.h or net/if_sl.c) I don't remember the original derivation of this name, but this data strcture contains the current state of the interface. > protosw (in netinet/protosw.h) This is the protocol switch table. > Thanks for the help, > Marc I hope I have. ;^) -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr wes@softweyr.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 15:39:53 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA27165 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 15:39:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from obie.softweyr.com ([204.68.178.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA27138 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 15:39:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@obie.softweyr.com) Received: (from wes@localhost) by obie.softweyr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA26013; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 16:39:27 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wes) From: Wes Peters Message-Id: <199806012239.QAA26013@obie.softweyr.com> Subject: Re: Move a value from dhcp client on interface to dhcp server on othe r interface In-Reply-To: from "Pitcairn, Duncan" at "May 30, 98 12:00:18 pm" To: DuncanP@Cairnwood.com (Pitcairn, Duncan) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 16:39:27 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Does anyone have a script or instructions for moving the value for > domain-name-servers received by dhclient to a dhcpd.conf file? > > What I am working on is a FreeBSD 2.2.6 system with two network > interfaces. Interface 1 is connected to a Cable Modem through which it > receives dhcp client values, including doman-name-servers. Interface 2 > is conected to our network and it is running dhcpd. I need to move the > domain-name-server values from dhclient.leases (or from resolve.conf) > after dhclient runs but before dhcpd starts so that dhcpd can pass > domain-name-servers on to the clients on our network. A better idea would be to run a caching nameserver on your FreeBSD machine. If you run a traditional caching nameserver, you won't need to worry about the nameserver passed to you by the cable modem connection. If you want to modify the caching server to use the cable modem server as the 'upstream' connection, your cable modem DHCP client script would need to edit named.boot to edit the address you've just received into the 'forwarders' line, then (re)start the named server. In both cases, your dhcp server should advertise your FreeBSD machine as the DNS server to your clients. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr wes@softweyr.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 20:28:51 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA23109 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 20:28:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (0@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.110.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA23068 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 20:28:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cy@cschuber.net.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.0/8.6.10) id UAA02417; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 20:28:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cschuber.net.gov.bc.ca(142.31.240.113), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpdaaclva; Mon Jun 1 20:28:23 1998 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.9.0/8.6.10) id UAA05707; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 20:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199806020328.UAA05707@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdRa5699; Mon Jun 1 20:27:42 1998 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 Reply-to: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-Sender: cy To: Philippe Regnauld cc: security@deepo.prosa.dk, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw & icmp question In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 May 1998 23:48:08 +0200." <19980530234807.14632@deepo.prosa.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 20:27:41 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > [crossposting to -net and -security -- shoot me if necessary] > > I am a bit puzzled regarding the following situation: > > I have a machine with IPFW setup to send "port unreachable" if > a connection attempt is made on port 113/TCP (identd). The policy > is default deny. Here is what happens when I do "telnet host 113" > > - from a FreeBSD host (A.B.C.D) to the FreeBSD box (E.F.G.H): > > 01:35:02.307343 A.B.C.D.2218 > E.F.G.H.113: S 2940925835:2940925835(0) win 16 384 (DF) [tos 0x10] > 01:35:02.308070 E.F.G.H > A.B.C.D: icmp: E.F.G.H tcp port 113 unreachable (DF ) > 01:35:04.850388 A.B.C.D.2218 > E.F.G.H.113: S 2940925835:2940925835(0) win 16 384 (DF) [tos 0x10] > 01:35:04.851237 E.F.G.H > A.B.C.D: icmp: E.F.G.H tcp port 113 unreachable (DF ) > > Symptom: the connection is NOT dropped right away, and the > first host (A.B.C.D) keeps on trying until timeout -- thus > the packet being sent twice as above) > > Both hosts are 2.2.6 Digital UNIX 4.0B behaves the same as above. > > - from a Linux box (W.X.Y.Z) to the same FreeBSD box (E.F.G.H): > > 01:38:22.901190 W.X.Y.Z.1166 > E.F.G.H.113: S 3448428087:3448428087(0) win 51 2 > 01:38:22.901969 E.F.G.H > W.X.Y.Z: icmp: E.F.G.H tcp port 113 unreachable > > No problem here, the linux telnet responds: > > Trying E.F.G.H... > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused > > ... and returns right away. > Solaris 2.5 behaves the same as above. I would think that with a rule like, ipfw add 1 unreach port tcp from any to any 23, that the Solaris and Linux telnet clients respond with "connection refused" immediately would be the correct action rather than waiting for five port unreachable ICMP messages before terminating the connection attempt. Is there a sysctl variable that needs to be set to change this behavior? Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Open Systems Group Internet: cschuber@uumail.gov.bc.ca ITSD Cy.Schubert@gems8.gov.bc.ca Government of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 20:36:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA24668 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 20:36:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpha.xerox.com (omega.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.95]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id UAA24597 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 20:36:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@parc.xerox.com) Received: from mango.parc.xerox.com ([13.1.102.232]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <32571(1)>; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 20:35:47 PDT Received: from mango.parc.xerox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mango.parc.xerox.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA08380; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 20:35:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@mango.parc.xerox.com) Message-Id: <199806020335.UAA08380@mango.parc.xerox.com> To: Philippe Regnauld cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw & icmp question In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 30 May 1998 14:48:07 PDT." <19980530234807.14632@deepo.prosa.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <8377.896758539.1@mango.parc.xerox.com> Date: Mon, 1 Jun 1998 20:35:40 PDT From: Bill Fenner Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Most TCP stacks ignore ICMP TCP port unraechable errors. You need to configure ipfw to send a TCP RST instead. Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jun 1 22:09:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA12291 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 22:09:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from softweyr.com ([204.68.178.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA12283 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 22:08:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from softweyr.com (localhost.softweyr.com [127.0.0.1]) by softweyr.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id XAA26458 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 1998 23:08:48 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Message-ID: <357388DF.981DDCBF@softweyr.com> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 23:08:47 -0600 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr llc X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: router performance Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------25D0B2508EA9A91761F23C4F" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------25D0B2508EA9A91761F23C4F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Oops, forgot the -net mailing list: -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr wes@softweyr.com --------------25D0B2508EA9A91761F23C4F Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-ID: <357388A6.6E4C0B39@softweyr.com> Date: Mon, 01 Jun 1998 23:07:50 -0600 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr llc X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tim Tsai Subject: Re: router performance References: <19980531230640.52576@futuresouth.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Tim Tsai wrote: > > Can I expect a FreeBSD-based router (say, Pentium Pro 180 with 64-128megs > of RAM) to do the following reasonably well? > > 1) Route 2-4 T1's worth of traffic (judging from the recent fastforward > thread I don't think this is a problem) > 2) run BGP > 3) do *extensive* inbound packet filtering (anti-spoofing, no > broadcasts, etc.). > 4) talk to the rest of the LAN through an ethernet interface > > Our Cisco 3640 with a Mips R4700/100Mhz is choking routinely with two > T1's during periods of DoS attacks. It's quite capable of routing the > traffic but the packet filtering is eating up all the CPU. Throw in ip > accounting (which is only needed *during* an attack) and you can forget > about any response. One of the nice benefits of using FreeBSD for such a system is the scalability. If one single FreeBSD system doesn't cut it, you could use 5 of them. Put one on each T1 doing packet filtering/firewalling, routing to ethernet. Then use another system to route between the 4 "external" ethernets and your internet network. Actually, you should be able to do all of the above on a single Pentium- class system of 200 Mhz or so *when NOT under attack.* If you're looking at new hardware, a K6/233 (or so) should fit the bill nicely. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr wes@softweyr.com --------------25D0B2508EA9A91761F23C4F-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jun 2 01:05:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA09937 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 01:05:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vorbis.noc.easynet.net (qmailr@vorbis.noc.easynet.net [195.40.1.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id BAA09925 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 01:05:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chrisy@vorbis.noc.easynet.net) Received: (qmail 2248 invoked by uid 1943); 2 Jun 1998 08:05:39 -0000 Message-ID: <19980602090539.01658@flix.net> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 09:05:39 +0100 From: Chrisy Luke To: Jacques Vidrine Cc: Claude Tardif , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Unknown abbreviations References: <35721ACA.A51B7BD4@cam.org> <199806010458.XAA27364@cerebus.nectar.com> <19980601192301.42902@flix.net> <199806011841.NAA01888@cerebus.nectar.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: <199806011841.NAA01888@cerebus.nectar.com>; from Jacques Vidrine on Mon, Jun 01, 1998 at 01:41:53PM -0500 Organization: The Flirble Internet Exchange X-URL: http://www.flix.net/ X-FTP: ftp://ftp.flirble.org/ Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Jacques Vidrine wrote (on Jun 01): > I think the original poster was attempting to determine > something of the etymology of ``protosw'' and ``softc''. > Of course I can't read minds :-) though I like to pretend > to sometimes :-) This is what I realised once I'd got home and into bed.. ;-) And I came up with "Soft Config" - it's that part of the config you can change in software. Chris. -- == chris@easynet.net, chrisy@flix.net, chrisy@flirble.org. == Head of Systems for Easynet Group PLC. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jun 2 01:23:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA12381 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 01:23:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vorbis.noc.easynet.net (qmailr@vorbis.noc.easynet.net [195.40.1.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id BAA12368 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 01:23:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chrisy@vorbis.noc.easynet.net) Received: (qmail 2964 invoked by uid 1943); 2 Jun 1998 08:23:05 -0000 Message-ID: <19980602092305.52419@flix.net> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 09:23:05 +0100 From: Chrisy Luke To: Paul Emerson Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipv6 network addresses References: <199806012000.QAA14487@gta.gta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: <199806012000.QAA14487@gta.gta.com>; from Paul Emerson on Mon, Jun 01, 1998 at 03:51:25PM -0400 Organization: The Flirble Internet Exchange X-URL: http://www.flix.net/ X-FTP: ftp://ftp.flirble.org/ Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Paul Emerson wrote (on Jun 01): > Repeat after me: All NAT solutions are not created equal. However NAT does make traceability significantly more difficult. It also adds quite a few CPU cycles into the packet forwarding loop. I don't see why "Making everyone come from the same address" is so desirable. In itself it has no security built in, certainly none that can't better be provided and tracked by a firewall. Good network numbering can do effectively the same job significantly better and without overhead. NAT is not a security measure, but an administrative mechanism for saving IPv4 address space and nothing more. Chris. -- == chris@easynet.net, chrisy@flix.net, chrisy@flirble.org. == Head of Systems for Easynet Group PLC. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jun 2 01:30:21 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA13293 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 01:30:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from msf1.swe.ids.dps.casa.es (pppuser060.recol.es [195.53.237.124]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA13136 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 01:29:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jlfreniche@acm.org) Received: from hpswe.swe.ids.dps.casa.es (hpswe.swe.ids.dps.casa.es [172.16.50.100]) by msf1.swe.ids.dps.casa.es (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA02128 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 09:55:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jlfreniche@acm.org) Received: from hpswe.swe.ids.dps.casa.es (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hpswe.swe.ids.dps.casa.es with SMTP (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA07680 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 09:57:05 +0200 (METDST) Message-ID: <3573B051.A6F@acm.org> Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 09:57:05 +0200 From: "Juan L. Freniche" X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01Gold (X11; I; HP-UX B.10.20 9000/879) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD NET Subject: Re: Questions again on T/TCP References: <199806012042.EAA11209@spinner.netplex.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Peter Wemm wrote: > TF_NOPUSH is *copied* from the listening socket. It's only present if the > listener has explicitly enabled it. > > tp->t_flags |= tp0->t_flags & (TF_NOPUSH|TF_NOOPT); > > ie: only copy the TF_NOPUSH and TF_NOOPT flags from the listener to the > clone. If they are not set on the master/listener, the clone does not get > them. Thanks Peter, I missed the 0 in tp0. But I still don't understand why insertion of this test solves the security hole. -------------------------- E-Mail: jlfreniche@acm.org -------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jun 2 01:48:48 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA15753 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 01:48:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.ftf.dk (mail.ftf.dk [129.142.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA15739 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 01:48:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk) Received: from mail.prosa.dk ([192.168.100.2]) by mail.ftf.dk (8.8.8/8.8.8/gw-ftf-1.0) with ESMTP id KAA10891; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 10:48:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.ftf.dk: Host [192.168.100.2] claimed to be mail.prosa.dk Received: from deepo.prosa.dk (deepo.prosa.dk [192.168.100.10]) by mail.prosa.dk (8.8.5/8.8.5/prosa-1.1) with ESMTP id KAA19774; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 10:49:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from regnauld@localhost) by deepo.prosa.dk (8.8.8/8.8.5/prosa-1.1) id KAA17083; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 10:47:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <19980602104741.35998@deepo.prosa.dk> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 10:47:41 +0200 From: Philippe Regnauld To: Bill Fenner Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw & icmp question References: <19980530234807.14632@deepo.prosa.dk> <199806020335.UAA08380@mango.parc.xerox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e In-Reply-To: <199806020335.UAA08380@mango.parc.xerox.com>; from Bill Fenner on Mon, Jun 01, 1998 at 08:35:40PM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE i386 Organization: PROSA Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Bill Fenner writes: > Most TCP stacks ignore ICMP TCP port unraechable errors. You > need to configure ipfw to send a TCP RST instead. That did the trick, thanks! Though it's a bit of a PITA, since there is no RESET option in ipfw < 2.2.5, and I have several machines running 2.2.[1,2] -- -[ Philippe Regnauld / sysadmin / regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk / +55.4N +11.3E ]- «Pluto placed his bad dog at the entrance of Hades to keep the dead IN and the living OUT! The archetypical corporate firewall?» - S. Kelly Bootle To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jun 2 01:56:31 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA16933 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 01:56:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.ftf.dk (mail.ftf.dk [129.142.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA16919 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 01:56:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk) Received: from mail.prosa.dk ([192.168.100.2]) by mail.ftf.dk (8.8.8/8.8.8/gw-ftf-1.0) with ESMTP id KAA11027; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 10:56:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.ftf.dk: Host [192.168.100.2] claimed to be mail.prosa.dk Received: from deepo.prosa.dk (deepo.prosa.dk [192.168.100.10]) by mail.prosa.dk (8.8.5/8.8.5/prosa-1.1) with ESMTP id KAA19784; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 10:57:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from regnauld@localhost) by deepo.prosa.dk (8.8.8/8.8.5/prosa-1.1) id KAA17134; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 10:55:26 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <19980602105525.36962@deepo.prosa.dk> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 10:55:25 +0200 From: Philippe Regnauld To: Chrisy Luke Cc: Paul Emerson , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipv6 network addresses References: <199806012000.QAA14487@gta.gta.com> <19980602092305.52419@flix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88e In-Reply-To: <19980602092305.52419@flix.net>; from Chrisy Luke on Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 09:23:05AM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE i386 Organization: PROSA Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Chrisy Luke writes: > Paul Emerson wrote (on Jun 01): > > Repeat after me: All NAT solutions are not created equal. > > I don't see why "Making everyone come from the same address" is so > desirable. In itself it has no security built in, certainly none that > can't better be provided and tracked by a firewall. Good NAT solutions use a pool of addresses (i.e.: Cisco), where hosts seem to come from different addresses each time). This also allow for semi-permanent "two-way" setups, allowing for example ftp back-connect and other horrible things transparently. Using the same address for everything is in fact not recommended as it increases visibility for your nat box, and the chance of getting same port numbers decreases. Cisco calls this technique "overloading". > Good network numbering can do effectively the same job significantly > better and without overhead. It depends how big a fish you are. If you get your block of addresses from your provider, like I do, and interconnect the networks of some 8 different organization, then you don't want to have to renumber if you leave. And there's a fat chance you'll get router with less than /22, provided you had your own block in the first place. NAT is the poor man's independance. > NAT is not a security measure, but an administrative mechanism for saving > IPv4 address space and nothing more. ... and not being subjected to provider pressure. -- -[ Philippe Regnauld / sysadmin / regnauld@deepo.prosa.dk / +55.4N +11.3E ]- «Pluto placed his bad dog at the entrance of Hades to keep the dead IN and the living OUT! The archetypical corporate firewall?» - S. Kelly Bootle To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jun 2 03:10:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA24432 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 03:10:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vorbis.noc.easynet.net (qmailr@vorbis.noc.easynet.net [195.40.1.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id DAA24371 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 03:10:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chrisy@vorbis.noc.easynet.net) Received: (qmail 7583 invoked by uid 1943); 2 Jun 1998 10:10:03 -0000 Message-ID: <19980602111002.31706@flix.net> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 11:10:02 +0100 From: Chrisy Luke To: Philippe Regnauld Cc: Paul Emerson , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipv6 network addresses References: <199806012000.QAA14487@gta.gta.com> <19980602092305.52419@flix.net> <19980602105525.36962@deepo.prosa.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.88 In-Reply-To: <19980602105525.36962@deepo.prosa.dk>; from Philippe Regnauld on Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 10:55:25AM +0200 Organization: The Flirble Internet Exchange X-URL: http://www.flix.net/ X-FTP: ftp://ftp.flirble.org/ Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Philippe Regnauld wrote (on Jun 02): > Good NAT solutions use a pool of addresses (i.e.: Cisco), > where hosts seem to come from different addresses each time). > This also allow for semi-permanent "two-way" setups, allowing > for example ftp back-connect and other horrible things transparently. Where's the FreeBSD implementation then? :-) > It depends how big a fish you are. If you get your block of > addresses from your provider, like I do, and interconnect > the networks of some 8 different organization, then you don't > want to have to renumber if you leave. This is true, but I still find NAT a hammer-and-nut solution, but I sympathise with that predicament. However, as I understood it, IPv6 addresses will be relatively freely available (as compared to IPv4) and so anyone that suspects they may need to renumber sometime in the future can get them from day one, without the requirement of being multihomed or any such. > and there's a fat chance > you'll get router with less than /22, provided you had your own > block in the first place. Yes, but we're talking IPv6 here.. :-) Chris. -- == chris@easynet.net, chrisy@flix.net, chrisy@flirble.org. == Head of Systems for Easynet Group PLC. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jun 2 05:18:05 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA13290 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 05:18:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from whizzo.transsys.com (whizzo.TransSys.COM [144.202.42.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA13251 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 05:18:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from louie@whizzo.transsys.com) Received: from whizzo.transsys.com (localhost.transsys.com [127.0.0.1]) by whizzo.transsys.com (8.8.8/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA01494; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 08:17:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199806021217.IAA01494@whizzo.transsys.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: Chrisy Luke cc: Philippe Regnauld , Paul Emerson , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Louis A. Mamakos" Subject: Re: ipv6 network addresses References: <199806012000.QAA14487@gta.gta.com> <19980602092305.52419@flix.net> <19980602105525.36962@deepo.prosa.dk> <19980602111002.31706@flix.net> In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 02 Jun 1998 11:10:02 BST." <19980602111002.31706@flix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 08:17:38 -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > However, as I understood it, IPv6 addresses will be relatively > freely available (as compared to IPv4) and so anyone that suspects they > may need to renumber sometime in the future can get them from day one, > without the requirement of being multihomed or any such. The availability of addresses has nothing to do with the likelyhood of having to renumber. Provider-based addressing is pervasive these days so that the global Internet routing table doesn't explode in size. The size of the routing table is of very much more concern than running out of address space. And it's just not the amount of memeory needed (pretty much all of the Cisco routers in the default-free part of the Internet have 64MB, mostly 128MB of memory), but the amount of processing required to handle the routing updates. Aggregating a bunch of prefixes means that external to the AS, you don't see the instability of any single network; this reduces the "churn" in the routing table which is also of concern. So, NAT is a convienience to those behind the translation, as they can change providers without having to renumber all their machines, and it enables them to easily use address space out of a provider block, which help keep the routers from exploding. There are some approaches suggested in IPv6 (the so-called 8+8 addressing scheme) which aims to address this problem; essentially, you take a part of the 16 byte address and use it as a provider/AS selector. It can be changed on the fly by routers and is not used as part of identifing the endpoint. This would allow renumbering and aliasing of addresses, which would help significantly if you were multihomed. Alas, this is not yet an intergral part of the IPv6 architecture or fielded implementations. louie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jun 2 08:17:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA11479 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 08:17:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gateman.zeus.leitch.com (gateman.zeus.leitch.com [204.187.61.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA11458 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 08:17:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from woods@tap.zeus.leitch.com) Received: from zeus.leitch.com (tap.zeus.leitch.com [204.187.61.10]) by gateman.zeus.leitch.com (8.8.5/8.7.3/1.0) with ESMTP id LAA01103 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 11:16:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from brain.zeus.leitch.com (brain.zeus.leitch.com [204.187.61.32]) by zeus.leitch.com (8.7.5/8.7.3/1.0) with ESMTP id LAA15319 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 11:16:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from woods@localhost) by brain.zeus.leitch.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA21224; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 11:16:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from woods@tap.zeus.leitch.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 11:16:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199806021516.LAA21224@brain.zeus.leitch.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: woods@zeus.leitch.com (Greg A. Woods) To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw & icmp question In-Reply-To: Bill Fenner's message of "Mon, June 1, 1998 20:35:40 PDT" regarding "Re: ipfw & icmp question " id <199806020335.UAA08380@mango.parc.xerox.com> References: <19980530234807.14632@deepo.prosa.dk> <199806020335.UAA08380@mango.parc.xerox.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.45 under Emacs 20.2.1 Reply-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Organization: Planix, Inc.; Toronto, Ontario; Canada Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [ On Mon, June 1, 1998 at 20:35:40 (PDT), Bill Fenner wrote: ] > Subject: Re: ipfw & icmp question > > Most TCP stacks ignore ICMP TCP port unraechable errors. You > need to configure ipfw to send a TCP RST instead. I don't know about "most" TCP stacks.... I know that SunOS-4 has major problems with them too -- the result is a connection timed out for all TCP attempts to the destination after receiving ICMP_UNREACH_PORT. If Digital UNIX 4.0B and FreeBSD 2.2.6 do the same then thats three with the problem against two without! ;-) With 2.2.6 behaving this way it suggests all 4.4BSD based stacks will do likewise unless they've been subsequently fixed. I don't know where that leaves firewall administrators. My guess is they should only return ICMP_UNREACH_PORT for UDP protocols and should always return TCP RST for all TCP protocols, regardless of what the standards might say, since that's what's most likely to work given an arbitrary remote client host. -- Greg A. Woods +1 416 443-1734 VE3TCP Planix, Inc. ; Secrets of the Weird To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jun 2 08:24:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA12592 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 08:24:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gateman.zeus.leitch.com (gateman.zeus.leitch.com [204.187.61.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA12513 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 08:23:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from woods@tap.zeus.leitch.com) Received: from zeus.leitch.com (tap.zeus.leitch.com [204.187.61.10]) by gateman.zeus.leitch.com (8.8.5/8.7.3/1.0) with ESMTP id LAA01152; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 11:22:49 -0400 (EDT) Received: from brain.zeus.leitch.com (brain.zeus.leitch.com [204.187.61.32]) by zeus.leitch.com (8.7.5/8.7.3/1.0) with ESMTP id LAA15345; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 11:22:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from woods@localhost) by brain.zeus.leitch.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA21260; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 11:22:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from woods@tap.zeus.leitch.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 11:22:52 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199806021522.LAA21260@brain.zeus.leitch.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: woods@zeus.leitch.com (Greg A. Woods) To: Chrisy Luke Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipv6 network addresses In-Reply-To: Chrisy Luke's message of "Tue, June 2, 1998 11:10:02 +0100" regarding "Re: ipv6 network addresses" id <19980602111002.31706@flix.net> References: <199806012000.QAA14487@gta.gta.com> <19980602092305.52419@flix.net> <19980602105525.36962@deepo.prosa.dk> <19980602111002.31706@flix.net> X-Mailer: VM 6.45 under Emacs 20.2.1 Reply-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Organization: Planix, Inc.; Toronto, Ontario; Canada Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [ On Tue, June 2, 1998 at 11:10:02 (+0100), Chrisy Luke wrote: ] > Subject: Re: ipv6 network addresses > > Philippe Regnauld wrote (on Jun 02): > > Good NAT solutions use a pool of addresses (i.e.: Cisco), > > where hosts seem to come from different addresses each time). > > This also allow for semi-permanent "two-way" setups, allowing > > for example ftp back-connect and other horrible things transparently. > > Where's the FreeBSD implementation then? :-) Darren Reed's IP-Filter + NAT package does this quite nicely (though I've never actually proven that there's some "randomness" to the source address used -- though I'd guess with a sufficiently busy set of connections it would appear to be random). -- Greg A. Woods +1 416 443-1734 VE3TCP Planix, Inc. ; Secrets of the Weird To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jun 2 10:40:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA06803 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 10:40:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from send1c.yahoomail.com (send1c.yahoomail.com [205.180.60.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA06788 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 10:40:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from omenzel@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <19980602174132.24827.rocketmail@send1c.yahoomail.com> Received: from [209.109.228.70] by send1c; Tue, 02 Jun 1998 10:41:32 PDT Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 10:41:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Oliver Menzel Subject: Decreasing MSL value To: FreeBSD NET MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, Im considering decreasing the default MSL value so that my tcp connections exit faster from the TIME_WAIT state Would this be right way to do this? in /usr/src/sys/netinet --- tcp_timer.orig.h Tue Jun 2 13:30:40 1998 +++ tcp_timer.h Tue Jun 2 13:30:55 1998 @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ /* * Time constants. */ -#define TCPTV_MSL ( 30*PR_SLOWHZ) /* max seg lifetime (hah!) */ +#define TCPTV_MSL ( 20*PR_SLOWHZ) /* max seg lifetime (hah!) */ #define TCPTV_SRTTBASE 0 /* base roundtrip time; if 0, no idea yet */ #define TCPTV_RTOBASE ( 3*PR_SLOWHZ) /* assumed RTO if no info */ Another words set the TCPTV_MSL to 20 seconds, thus lowering 2MSL for TIME_WAIT to 40s from 60s. TIA Oliver _________________________________________________________ DO YOU YAHOO!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jun 2 14:35:52 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA14088 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 14:35:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA14012 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 14:35:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by frmug.org (8.9.0/frmug-2.3/nospam) with UUCP id XAA04063 for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 23:35:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from roberto@localhost) by keltia.freenix.fr (8.9.0.Beta4/keltia-2.14/nospam) id WAA06606 for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 22:33:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roberto) Message-ID: <19980602223355.A6532@keltia.freenix.fr> Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 22:33:55 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipv6 network addresses Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG References: <199806012000.QAA14487@gta.gta.com> <19980602092305.52419@flix.net> <19980602105525.36962@deepo.prosa.dk> <19980602111002.31706@flix.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.92.3i In-Reply-To: <19980602111002.31706@flix.net>; from Chrisy Luke on Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 11:10:02AM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT ctm#4311 AMD-K6 MMX @ 225 MHz Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org According to Chrisy Luke: > Where's the FreeBSD implementation then? :-) In IPFilter from Darren Reed. In /usr/src/contrib in current and available for stable too. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 3.0-CURRENT #60: Fri May 15 21:04:22 CEST 1998 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jun 2 18:18:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA22705 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 18:18:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bone.nectar.com (bone.nectar.com [204.27.67.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA22636 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 18:18:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nectar@bone.nectar.com) Received: from bone.nectar.com (localhost.communique.net [127.0.0.1]) by bone.nectar.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id UAA07241; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 20:15:47 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199806030115.UAA07241@bone.nectar.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 X-PGP-RSAfprint: 00 F9 E6 A2 C5 4D 0A 76 26 8B 8B 57 73 D0 DE EE X-PGP-RSAkey: http://pgp.ai.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x094724A9 From: Jacques Vidrine In-reply-to: <199806012044.EAA11242@spinner.netplex.com.au> References: <199806012044.EAA11242@spinner.netplex.com.au> Subject: Re: Unknown abbreviations To: Peter Wemm , Chrisy Luke , Claude Tardif , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, Archie Cobbs Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 20:15:47 -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- struct *_softc = ``Software config'' structure I'll buy that. Jacques Vidrine On 2 June 1998 at 4:44, Peter Wemm wrote: > "Soft Config" is what I seem to remember being told, it may or may not be > accurate. It's the software part of the device driver state, as opposed > to the hardware register state. On 1 June 1998 at 12:50, Archie Cobbs wrote: > Guess: "software copy" (as opposed to information on the chip) ? On 2 June 1998 at 9:05, Chrisy Luke wrote: > This is what I realised once I'd got home and into bed.. ;-) > And I came up with "Soft Config" - it's that part of the config > you can change in software. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNXSjwjeRhT8JRySpAQFKLQP9GtwTWasH3hjG6ZfIt56THRPyC4kVo2kY D8cBdcE1AhwJpVDp4RHFZxcWU5RRz9UctisSLyr2/b6yADTPwQIgta4Mbiz8gyui +p7q23RoKEwvvkEoqaagFRtgRrczMvDGsCPfhyrtUL2hjj9QgnEfoi02aWeZgIei iQyfkDkMJfY= =YHFY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jun 2 19:32:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA03301 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 19:32:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA03252 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 19:32:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA09711; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 19:30:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd009693; Wed Jun 3 02:30:13 1998 Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 19:30:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Jacques Vidrine cc: Peter Wemm , Chrisy Luke , Claude Tardif , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, Archie Cobbs Subject: Re: Unknown abbreviations In-Reply-To: <199806030115.UAA07241@bone.nectar.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I always thought of it as the Software Context of a device as opposed to the state held in hardware. julian On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, Jacques Vidrine wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > struct *_softc = ``Software config'' structure > > I'll buy that. > > Jacques Vidrine > > On 2 June 1998 at 4:44, Peter Wemm wrote: > > "Soft Config" is what I seem to remember being told, it may or may not be > > accurate. It's the software part of the device driver state, as opposed > > to the hardware register state. > > On 1 June 1998 at 12:50, Archie Cobbs wrote: > > Guess: "software copy" (as opposed to information on the chip) ? > > On 2 June 1998 at 9:05, Chrisy Luke wrote: > > This is what I realised once I'd got home and into bed.. ;-) > > And I came up with "Soft Config" - it's that part of the config > > you can change in software. > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: 2.6.2 > > iQCVAwUBNXSjwjeRhT8JRySpAQFKLQP9GtwTWasH3hjG6ZfIt56THRPyC4kVo2kY > D8cBdcE1AhwJpVDp4RHFZxcWU5RRz9UctisSLyr2/b6yADTPwQIgta4Mbiz8gyui > +p7q23RoKEwvvkEoqaagFRtgRrczMvDGsCPfhyrtUL2hjj9QgnEfoi02aWeZgIei > iQyfkDkMJfY= > =YHFY > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jun 2 23:33:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA04716 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 23:33:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from abused.abused.com (root@cx569751-a.elcjn1.sdca.home.com [24.4.72.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA04670 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 23:33:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gvb@tns.net) Received: from cx569751-a ([192.168.0.2]) by abused.abused.com (8.9.0/None of your damn business!) with SMTP id XAA13138 for ; Tue, 2 Jun 1998 23:40:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199806030640.XAA13138@abused.abused.com> X-Sender: gvb@mail.tns.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.1 Date: Tue, 02 Jun 1998 23:33:43 -0700 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG From: GVB Subject: 3COM NIC Problems... Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I have a Pentium system running with two NICs, one a PCI 3c590, the second a PCI 3c905, upon bootup, the generic kernel only loads a driver for the 3c590, specifically the vx driver.. The 3c905 is not being asigned a driver and I cant find in any kernel configuration files the driver name for the 3c905..here is my exact dmesg.. pci0:19: vendor=0x10b7, device=0x9055, class=network (ethernet) int a irq 10 [no driver assigned] vx0 <3COM 3C590 Etherlink III PCI> rev 0 int a irq 9 on pci0:20:0 utp/aui/bnc[*utp*] address 00:a0:24:58:1b:bf it finds the 3c905 on irq10 but does not asign the propper driver..where do I start? Thanks.. GVB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jun 3 02:19:50 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA05717 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 02:19:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA05697 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 02:19:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA22400; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 09:19:29 GMT Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id LAA29557; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 11:19:05 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19980603111904.33620@follo.net> Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 11:19:04 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund To: GVB , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3COM NIC Problems... References: <199806030640.XAA13138@abused.abused.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i In-Reply-To: <199806030640.XAA13138@abused.abused.com>; from GVB on Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 11:33:43PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 11:33:43PM -0700, GVB wrote: > I have a Pentium system running with two NICs, one a PCI 3c590, the second > a PCI 3c905, upon bootup, the generic kernel only loads a driver for the > 3c590, specifically the vx driver.. The 3c905 is not being asigned a driver > and I cant find in any kernel configuration files the driver name for the > 3c905..here is my exact dmesg.. > > pci0:19: vendor=0x10b7, device=0x9055, class=network (ethernet) int a > irq 10 [no driver assigned] > vx0 <3COM 3C590 Etherlink III PCI> rev 0 int a irq 9 on pci0:20:0 > utp/aui/bnc[*utp*] address 00:a0:24:58:1b:bf > > > it finds the 3c905 on irq10 but does not asign the propper driver..where do > I start? (Read patch before applying) cvs diff: Diffing . Index: if_vx_pci.c =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/pci/if_vx_pci.c,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.8 if_vx_pci.c --- if_vx_pci.c 1998/02/20 13:11:53 1.8 +++ if_vx_pci.c 1998/06/03 09:15:47 @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ return "3COM 3C900 Etherlink XL PCI"; if(device_id == 0x905010b7ul || device_id == 0x905110b7ul) return "3COM 3C905 Fast Etherlink XL PCI"; + if(device_id == 0x905510b7ul) + printf("3COM 3C905B is NOT SUPPORTED. That B is significant!\n"); return NULL; } This patch is only correct if the above card is a 3c905B - if it is some other version of the 905, then you can _probably_ get away with replacing the printf() with a proper return. Alas, supporting the 905B is not a trivial exercise. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jun 3 07:00:03 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA15055 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 07:00:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.seidata.com (ns1.seidata.com [208.10.211.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA14963 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 06:59:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@seidata.com) Received: from localhost (mike@localhost) by ns1.seidata.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA10577; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 09:59:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 09:59:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Mike To: GVB cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3COM NIC Problems... In-Reply-To: <199806030640.XAA13138@abused.abused.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, GVB wrote: > it finds the 3c905 on irq10 but does not asign the propper driver..where do > I start? Write a driver? ;) I had the same problem with -CURRENT and a 3c905B-TX. The 3c905-TX's we got in our last shipment worked great, but when we bougt a new box of B's, no driver is assigned. -mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jun 3 07:48:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA23029 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 07:48:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from babelfish.axion.bt.co.uk (babelfish.axion.bt.co.uk [132.146.17.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA22984 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 07:48:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from antonio.herrera-alcantara@bt.com) Received: from sheriff.mavericks.bt.co.uk. (actually sheriff.mavericks.bt.co.uk) by babelfish.axion.bt.co.uk (PP) with SMTP; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 15:42:10 +0100 Received: from smtpgate.mavericks.bt.co.uk (smtpgate [132.146.105.7]) by sheriff.mavericks.bt.co.uk. (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id PAA20256 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 15:35:09 +0100 Received: by smtpgate.mavericks.bt.co.uk with Microsoft Mail id <35756D4D@smtpgate.mavericks.bt.co.uk>; Wed, 03 Jun 98 15:35:41 UCT From: "Herrera, Antonio, HERRERA2" To: "'smtp:freebsd-net@freebsd.org'" Subject: I'm lost Date: Wed, 03 Jun 98 15:26:00 UCT Message-ID: <35756D4D@smtpgate.mavericks.bt.co.uk> X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dear everybody. I'm writing to claim help. I had a normal IPv4 host working with FreeBSD. I've just installed the Kame stable release and I need help to progress, I'm stuck in spite of I've read carefully all of the documetation provided in the release. I need to set up a dual host and later on a router. After installing Kame I've lost v4 conectivity, how can I reconfigure my machine to be able to work with IPv4 as before?. After that I need to get v6 addresses, how do I get them?, and once I've got the v6 Addressses where can I find comprehensible information on how to configre a v6/v4 host and a v6/v4 router?. I appreciate any help you might give me. Thank you in advance. Antonio Herrera. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jun 3 08:06:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA25584 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 08:06:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from coconut.itojun.org (root@coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA25469 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 08:05:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from itojun@itojun.org) Received: from localhost (itojun@localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (8.8.8+3.0Wbeta12/3.6W) with ESMTP id AAA12459; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 00:05:19 +0900 (JST) To: "Herrera, Antonio, HERRERA2" cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: antonio.herrera-alcantara's message of Wed, 03 Jun 1998 15:26:00 +0700. <35756D4D@smtpgate.mavericks.bt.co.uk> X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 Subject: Re: I'm lost From: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 00:05:19 +0900 Message-ID: <12455.896886319@coconut.itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Dear everybody. > I'm writing to claim help. I had a normal IPv4 host working with FreeBSD. > I've just installed the Kame stable release and I need help to progress, >I'm stuck in spite of I've read carefully all of the documetation provided >in the release. > I need to set up a dual host and later on a router. After installing Kame >I've lost v4 conectivity, how can I reconfigure my machine to be able to >work with IPv4 as before?. > After that I need to get v6 addresses, how do I get them?, and once I've >got the v6 Addressses where can I find comprehensible information on how to >configre a v6/v4 host and a v6/v4 router?. oops, I've replied your message sent to in snap-users@kame.net too. Antonio, which mailing list do you prefer for this discussion? (in short, I believe this is due to kernel config file) itojun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jun 3 16:56:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA04353 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 16:56:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA03885; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 16:54:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA15127; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 16:44:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd015115; Wed Jun 3 23:44:33 1998 Message-ID: <3575DFDB.2781E494@whistle.com> Date: Wed, 03 Jun 1998 16:44:27 -0700 From: Julian Elischer Organization: Whistle Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.5-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Transparent packet diversion: Where is it? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org A month or so ago, someone announced a package that did redirection of packets to arbitrary places. I remember the comment "it's wierd seeing all those foreign adresses in the netstat listing". kind of like the Linux transproxy code I guess. if ANYONE has a pointer to that code I'd apreciate it. I've done every search I can think of on the mail archives.. julian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jun 3 17:15:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA09148 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 17:15:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpha.xerox.com (omega.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.95]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA08936 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 17:15:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@parc.xerox.com) Received: from mango.parc.xerox.com ([13.1.102.232]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <32549(1)>; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 17:14:22 PDT Received: from mango.parc.xerox.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mango.parc.xerox.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA13753 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 17:14:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fenner@mango.parc.xerox.com) Message-Id: <199806040014.RAA13753@mango.parc.xerox.com> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw & icmp question In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 02 Jun 1998 08:16:51 PDT." <199806021516.LAA21224@brain.zeus.leitch.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <13750.896919249.1@mango.parc.xerox.com> Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 17:14:09 PDT From: Bill Fenner Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <199806021516.LAA21224@brain.zeus.leitch.com>you write: >...suggests all 4.4BSD based stacks will do likewise unless they've been >subsequently fixed. All (any-version)-BSD based stacks do this. SunOS is 4.2BSD based, and Digital UNIX is 4.3BSD based. Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jun 3 21:59:57 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA27802 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 21:59:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from shangri-la.lcs.mit.edu (root@shangri-la.lcs.mit.edu [18.111.0.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA27783 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 21:59:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from beng@shangri-la.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from shangri-la.lcs.mit.edu (beng@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shangri-la.lcs.mit.edu (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA09817; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 00:59:20 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199806040459.AAA09817@shangri-la.lcs.mit.edu> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 To: Mike cc: GVB , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3COM NIC Problems... In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 03 Jun 1998 09:59:15 EDT." From: Benjamin Greenwald X-Sender: beng@lcs.mit.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 00:59:20 -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm going to have an alpha driver that works for the 905B available RSN. -Ben > On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, GVB wrote: > > > it finds the 3c905 on irq10 but does not asign the propper driver..where do > > I start? > > Write a driver? ;) I had the same problem with -CURRENT and a 3c905B-TX. > The 3c905-TX's we got in our last shipment worked great, but when we bougt > a new box of B's, no driver is assigned. > > -mike > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jun 3 22:20:40 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA00179 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 22:20:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.seidata.com (ns1.seidata.com [208.10.211.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA00158 for ; Wed, 3 Jun 1998 22:20:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@seidata.com) Received: from localhost (mike@localhost) by ns1.seidata.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA00715; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 01:19:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 01:19:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Mike To: Benjamin Greenwald cc: GVB , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3COM NIC Problems... In-Reply-To: <199806040459.AAA09817@shangri-la.lcs.mit.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Benjamin Greenwald wrote: > I'm going to have an alpha driver that works for the 905B available RSN. Cool. Need another tester? ;) -mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jun 4 00:15:42 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA15748 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 00:15:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from abused.abused.com (root@cx569751-a.elcjn1.sdca.home.com [24.4.72.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA15723 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 00:15:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gvb@tns.net) Received: from cx569751-a ([192.168.0.2]) by abused.abused.com (8.9.0/None of your damn business!) with SMTP id AAA13405 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 00:22:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199806040722.AAA13405@abused.abused.com> X-Sender: gvb@mail.tns.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.1 Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 00:15:42 -0700 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG From: GVB Subject: Supported 100base NIC's Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Now that I found out my 3c905B doesnt work with FreeBSD 2.2.6, what 100 base PCI network cards are supported, and are not buggy at all? Any input is appriciated. Thanks G To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jun 4 00:47:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA20054 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 00:47:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from arthur.axion.bt.co.uk (arthur.axion.bt.co.uk [132.146.5.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA20020 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 00:47:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from graeme.brown@bt-sys.bt.co.uk) Received: from rambo (actually rambo.futures.bt.co.uk) by arthur.axion.bt.co.uk (PP) with SMTP; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 08:44:58 +0100 Received: from maczebedee (actually macsmtp) by rambo with SMTP (PP); Thu, 4 Jun 1998 08:45:53 +0100 Message-ID: Date: 4 Jun 1998 08:44:23 +0100 From: Graeme Brown Subject: RE: Supported 100base NIC's To: "FreeBSD-Net (FreeBSD.Org) List" , GVB X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP for Quarterdeck Mail; Version 4.0.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Well the Intel EtherExpress 100/B is supported under thr fxp driver Graeme Brown Internet Futures Team BT Laboratories, UK email: graeme.brown@bt-sys.bt.co.uk _______________________________________________________________________________ To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG From: GVB on Thu, Jun 4, 1998 8:26 am Subject: Supported 100base NIC's RFC Header:Received: by maczebedee with ADMIN;4 Jun 1998 08:26:42 +0100 Received: from arthur.axion.bt.co.uk (actually mailhub) by rambo with SMTP (PP); Thu, 4 Jun 1998 08:28:10 +0100 Received: from hub.freebsd.org by arthur.axion.bt.co.uk (PP) with SMTP; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 08:26:05 +0100 Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id AAA15869; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 00:16:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net) Received: by hub.freebsd.org (bulk_mailer v1.6); Thu, 4 Jun 1998 00:15:44 -0700 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA15748 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 00:15:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from abused.abused.com (root@cx569751-a.elcjn1.sdca.home.com [24.4.72.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA15723 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 00:15:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gvb@tns.net) Received: from cx569751-a ([192.168.0.2]) by abused.abused.com (8.9.0/None of your damn business!) with SMTP id AAA13405 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 00:22:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199806040722.AAA13405@abused.abused.com> X-Sender: gvb@mail.tns.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0.1 Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 00:15:42 -0700 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG From: GVB Subject: Supported 100base NIC's Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Now that I found out my 3c905B doesnt work with FreeBSD 2.2.6, what 100 base PCI network cards are supported, and are not buggy at all? Any input is appriciated. Thanks G To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jun 4 01:23:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA26307 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 01:23:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from arthur.axion.bt.co.uk (arthur.axion.bt.co.uk [132.146.5.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA26276 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 01:23:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from graeme.brown@bt-sys.bt.co.uk) Received: from rambo (actually rambo.futures.bt.co.uk) by arthur.axion.bt.co.uk (PP) with SMTP; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 09:16:10 +0100 Received: from maczebedee (actually macsmtp) by rambo with SMTP (PP); Thu, 4 Jun 1998 09:17:48 +0100 Message-ID: Date: 4 Jun 1998 09:17:18 +0100 From: Graeme Brown Subject: Using rsh under FreeBSD To: "FreeBSD-Net (FreeBSD.Org) List" X-Mailer: Mail*Link SMTP for Quarterdeck Mail; Version 4.0.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi FreeBSD-netters I am debugging a multicast routeing protocol under FreeBSD and would like to simultaneously start the m/c routing demon in question on several FreeBSD routers at once. The demon has to run with root privileges. I would like to do something along the lines of i) logging in to one FreeBSD router (as root) ii) run a shell script which starts the demon on the local router and then issues rsh commands to the other routers in the test network to start up their routeing demons. I am however tripping up over rsh permissions etc. I have tried to set up an /.rhosts on router2 with the line router1 root so that router1 can issue a rsh command directed to router2 with root privileges something like rsh -l root router2 "run demon command" but I get permission denied messages each time. I also tried /etc/hosts.equiv with the same line. Can anyone point me in the right direction to get something like this working ? TIA Graeme Brown BT Labs, UK email: graeme.brown@bt-sys.bt.co.uk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jun 4 01:28:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA26906 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 01:28:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from relay.ucb.crimea.ua (relay.ucb.crimea.ua [194.93.177.113]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA26760; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 01:26:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ru@ucb.crimea.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by relay.ucb.crimea.ua (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA28339; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 11:25:31 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Message-ID: <19980604112530.B27834@ucb.crimea.ua> Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 11:25:30 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Julian Elischer , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Transparent packet diversion: Where is it? Mail-Followup-To: Julian Elischer , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG References: <3575DFDB.2781E494@whistle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91i In-Reply-To: <3575DFDB.2781E494@whistle.com>; from Julian Elischer on Wed, Jun 03, 1998 at 04:44:27PM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.6-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi! I recently wrote a small program which utilizes one divert socket and one udp socket to implement IP-over-IP tunneling. 1. It has a bug: the IP checksum only valid for packets without IP options. This is due to recalculating checksum using in_cksum_hdr(). 2. It lacks crypto-module, I'm planning to implement it soon. 3. You should specify the ``out'' keyword of the ipfw rule if you want your packets to be processed by the redirection-host itself (thus, TTL--). Any feedback will be much appreciated! You can download it from http://www.ucb.crimea.ua/~ru/FreeBSD/iptunnel/ On Wed, Jun 03, 1998 at 04:44:27PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > A month or so ago, someone announced a package that > did redirection of packets to arbitrary places. > > > I remember the comment > "it's wierd seeing all those foreign adresses in the netstat listing". > > kind of like the Linux transproxy code I guess. > > if ANYONE has a pointer to that code I'd apreciate it. > I've done every search I can think of on the mail archives.. > > julian Regards, -- Ruslan Ermilov System Administrator ru@ucb.crimea.ua United Commercial Bank +380-652-247647 Simferopol, Crimea 2426679 ICQ Network, UIN To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jun 4 02:45:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA07743 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 02:45:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA07725; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 02:45:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA29404; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 02:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd029401; Thu Jun 4 09:40:13 1998 Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 02:40:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Ruslan Ermilov cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Transparent packet diversion: Where is it? In-Reply-To: <19980604112530.B27834@ucb.crimea.ua> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org nope, that's not it.. IPdivert is similar to what I want but not it.. (we wrote divert so we know about that one :-) On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Hi! > > I recently wrote a small program which utilizes one divert socket and > one udp socket to implement IP-over-IP tunneling. > > 1. It has a bug: the IP checksum only valid for packets without IP options. > This is due to recalculating checksum using in_cksum_hdr(). > 2. It lacks crypto-module, I'm planning to implement it soon. > 3. You should specify the ``out'' keyword of the ipfw rule if you want your > packets to be processed by the redirection-host itself (thus, TTL--). > > Any feedback will be much appreciated! > > You can download it from > > http://www.ucb.crimea.ua/~ru/FreeBSD/iptunnel/ > > On Wed, Jun 03, 1998 at 04:44:27PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > A month or so ago, someone announced a package that > > did redirection of packets to arbitrary places. > > > > > > I remember the comment > > "it's wierd seeing all those foreign adresses in the netstat listing". > > > > kind of like the Linux transproxy code I guess. > > > > if ANYONE has a pointer to that code I'd apreciate it. > > I've done every search I can think of on the mail archives.. > > > > julian > > Regards, > -- > Ruslan Ermilov System Administrator > ru@ucb.crimea.ua United Commercial Bank > +380-652-247647 Simferopol, Crimea > 2426679 ICQ Network, UIN > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jun 4 02:56:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA10102 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 02:56:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from fgwnews.fujitsu.co.jp (fgwnews.fujitsu.co.jp [164.71.1.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA10031 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 02:55:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp) Received: from fdmmail.fujitsu.co.jp by fgwnews.fujitsu.co.jp (8.8.8+2.7Wbeta7/3.6W-MX980602-Fujitsu Gateway) id SAA27521; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 18:55:53 +0900 (JST) Received: from oshima.nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp by fdmmail.fujitsu.co.jp (8.8.8+2.7Wbeta7/3.6W-980601-Fujitsu Domain Master) id SAA14051; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 18:55:22 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (localhost.nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp [127.0.0.1]) by oshima.nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp (8.8.8/3.6W) with ESMTP id SAA14822; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 18:55:22 +0900 (JST) To: graeme.brown@bt-sys.bt.co.uk Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Using rsh under FreeBSD In-Reply-To: Your message of "4 Jun 1998 09:17:18 +0100" References: X-Mailer: Mew version 1.93b26 on Emacs 19.28 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <19980604185521Z.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 18:55:21 +0900 From: Yoshinobu Inoue X-Dispatcher: imput version 980302 Lines: 22 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I am however tripping up over rsh permissions etc. I have tried to > set up an /.rhosts on router2 with the line > > router1 root > > but I get permission denied messages each time. > I also tried /etc/hosts.equiv with the same line. > > Can anyone point me in the right direction to get something like > this working ? How about setting this on router2 or other routers? chmod 600 .rhosts If it doesn't work, please check if router2 or other routers can resolv the name 'router1'. For example, can you ping router1 from router2? router2> ping router1 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jun 4 04:36:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA22580 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 04:36:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA22523; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 04:36:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au) Message-Id: <199806041136.EAA22523@hub.freebsd.org> Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA129870153; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 21:35:53 +1000 From: Darren Reed Subject: Re: Transparent packet diversion: Where is it? To: julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 21:35:52 +1000 (EST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3575DFDB.2781E494@whistle.com> from "Julian Elischer" at Jun 3, 98 04:44:27 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In some mail from Julian Elischer, sie said: > > A month or so ago, someone announced a package that > did redirection of packets to arbitrary places. IP Filter. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jun 4 06:31:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA06311 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 06:31:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rodent.crp.com.au (rodent.crp.com.au [203.13.222.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA06304 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 06:31:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pedro@crp.com.au) Received: from senator (senator.crp.com.au [203.13.222.42]) by rodent.crp.com.au (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA11979; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 23:29:03 GMT Message-ID: <3576A3C9.A858433C@crp.com.au> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 23:40:25 +1000 From: David Peterson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jay S. Van Zeeland" CC: "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: RE: Sending a variable from one ASP page to another X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org instead of http://www.thesite.com/descript.asp?ID='%%ID%%' try: http://www.thesite.com/descript.asp?ID=<%ID%> Then in the new pages ASP use the following line to get you ID: ID = request.querystring("ID") Hope This Helps.. Rgds David Peterson Ringtail Solutions Melbourne, Australia To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jun 4 08:14:30 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA23158 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 08:14:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rodent.crp.com.au (rodent.crp.com.au [203.13.222.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA23024 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 08:13:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pedro@crp.com.au) Received: from senator (senator.crp.com.au [203.13.222.42]) by rodent.crp.com.au (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA12260 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 01:10:56 GMT Message-ID: <3576BBAC.CC453783@crp.com.au> Date: Fri, 05 Jun 1998 01:22:20 +1000 From: David Peterson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: SORRY! X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Sorry about my last post I think it's very late |-) David Peterson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jun 4 09:58:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA14390 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 09:58:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from qmiportal.questar.com ([204.96.64.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA14093 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 09:57:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joshp@questar.com) Received: from questar.com ([204.96.76.118]) by qmiportal.questar.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1 release PO203a ID# 0-36312U100L100S0) with ESMTP id AAA147 for ; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 09:56:00 -0700 Message-ID: <3576D1FF.A2A7E228@questar.com> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 09:57:35 -0700 From: joshp@questar.com (Josh Pennell) Organization: Questar Microsystems X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.02 [en]C-DIAL (WinNT; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: SUBSCRIBE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org SUBSCRIBE To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jun 4 10:48:56 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA22305 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 10:48:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from adinet.com.uy (suncueva.adinet.com.uy [206.99.44.241]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA22294; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 10:48:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ang@adinet.com.uy) Received: from angelo by adinet.com.uy (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id OAA20195; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 14:39:57 +0300 Message-ID: <3576DE84.ED153D95@adinet.com.uy> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 14:51:00 -0300 From: Angelo Nardone X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer CC: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Transparent packet diversion: Where is it? X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: <3575DFDB.2781E494@whistle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Julian Elischer wrote: > A month or so ago, someone announced a package that > did redirection of packets to arbitrary places. > > I remember the comment > "it's wierd seeing all those foreign adresses in the netstat listing". > > kind of like the Linux transproxy code I guess. > > if ANYONE has a pointer to that code I'd apreciate it. > I've done every search I can think of on the mail archives.. > > julian > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message I didn't remember that, but if you want redirect software download http://cheops.anu.edu.au/~avalon/ip-filter.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jun 4 12:29:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA17531 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 12:29:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA17490; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 12:28:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA02375; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 12:20:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd002369; Thu Jun 4 19:20:18 1998 Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 12:20:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Darren Reed cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Transparent packet diversion: Where is it? In-Reply-To: <199806041136.EAA22523@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org that wasn't it, though it does the job it's not what I remember being announced. On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Darren Reed wrote: > In some mail from Julian Elischer, sie said: > > > > A month or so ago, someone announced a package that > > did redirection of packets to arbitrary places. > > IP Filter. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jun 4 13:14:52 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA25249 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 13:14:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mailhub.scl.ameslab.gov (mailhub.scl.ameslab.gov [147.155.137.127]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA25041; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 13:13:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ghelmer@scl.ameslab.gov) Received: from demios.ether.scl.ameslab.gov ([147.155.137.54] helo=demios.scl.ameslab.gov) by mailhub.scl.ameslab.gov with smtp (Exim 1.90 #1) id 0yhgOE-0003V5-00; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 15:13:34 -0500 Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 15:13:43 -0500 (CDT) From: Guy Helmer To: Julian Elischer cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Transparent packet diversion: Where is it? In-Reply-To: <3576DE84.ED153D95@adinet.com.uy> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Angelo Nardone wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > > > A month or so ago, someone announced a package that > > did redirection of packets to arbitrary places. > > > > I remember the comment > > "it's wierd seeing all those foreign adresses in the netstat listing". Perhaps this was what you were looking for: Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 21:06:04 +0100 From: Chrisy Luke To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Beta 3 release of Multipath routing and friends. ftp://ftp.flirble.org/pub/unix/hacks/FreeBSD/mpath.b3.tgz README attached. A few fixes to the Multipath code. The metric stuff and the persistant route caching will come in b4. This code mostly adds support to the ipfw interface and code to support two things, which are based on the same thing: * Directing INCOMING traffic that match rules to a LOCAL TCP port. This is intended for transparent proxying without external calls to a LKM, it also doesn't touch the packet, so getsockname() works so there's also no need for a subsequent IOCTL to work out what the original destination/port was. It's freaky seeing random remote IP's listed as "Local addresses" in netstat! BSD-router-speed transparent diversion... :-) * Modifying the next-hop address of OUTBOUND traffic that matches the rule. My intention for this is to direct web traffic from a core router to a transparent proxy. David Sharnoff also wanted something similar, and the functionality of this thus extends to doing a route table lookup on the specified next-hop and using the route to it, meaning the next-hop doesn't need to be on a directly reachable interface. Remember though, this code only forwards to a directly reachable machine! It doesn't deliver it to the specified next-hop! TCP port numbers are ignored if this rule comes into affect. The rule-based forwarding mechanism is independant of the Multipath stuff, but does have multipath code in it if multipath is compiled in. Currently on rule-based forwarding there's a douvle-route-table penalty on the outbound traffic. I'll probably address this in b4 also. Chris. -- == chris@easynet.net, chrisy@flix.net, chrisy@flirble.org. == Head of Systems for Easynet Group PLC. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jun 4 16:59:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA11550 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 16:59:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA11425; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 16:58:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA13278; Thu, 4 Jun 1998 16:57:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd013267; Thu Jun 4 23:56:58 1998 Message-ID: <35773444.59E2B600@whistle.com> Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 16:56:52 -0700 From: Julian Elischer Organization: Whistle Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.5-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Guy Helmer CC: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Transparent packet diversion: Where is it? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org YES!!!! Guy Helmer wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Jun 1998, Angelo Nardone wrote: > > > Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > > A month or so ago, someone announced a package that > > > did redirection of packets to arbitrary places. > > > > > > I remember the comment > > > "it's wierd seeing all those foreign adresses in the netstat listing". > > Perhaps this was what you were looking for: > > Date: Thu, 30 Apr 1998 21:06:04 +0100 > From: Chrisy Luke > To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Beta 3 release of Multipath routing and friends. > > ftp://ftp.flirble.org/pub/unix/hacks/FreeBSD/mpath.b3.tgz > > README attached. > > A few fixes to the Multipath code. The metric stuff and the persistant > route caching will come in b4. > > This code mostly adds support to the ipfw interface and code to support > two things, which are based on the same thing: > > * Directing INCOMING traffic that match rules to a LOCAL TCP port. > This is intended for transparent proxying without external calls > to a LKM, it also doesn't touch the packet, so getsockname() works > so there's also no need for a subsequent IOCTL to work out what the > original destination/port was. > It's freaky seeing random remote IP's listed as "Local addresses" > in netstat! BSD-router-speed transparent diversion... :-) > > * Modifying the next-hop address of OUTBOUND traffic that matches the > rule. My intention for this is to direct web traffic from a core > router to a transparent proxy. David Sharnoff also wanted something > similar, and the functionality of this thus extends to doing a route > table lookup on the specified next-hop and using the route to it, > meaning the next-hop doesn't need to be on a directly reachable > interface. Remember though, this code only forwards to a directly > reachable machine! It doesn't deliver it to the specified next-hop! > TCP port numbers are ignored if this rule comes into affect. > > The rule-based forwarding mechanism is independant of the Multipath > stuff, but does have multipath code in it if multipath is compiled in. > > Currently on rule-based forwarding there's a douvle-route-table penalty > on the outbound traffic. I'll probably address this in b4 also. > > Chris. > -- > == chris@easynet.net, chrisy@flix.net, chrisy@flirble.org. > == Head of Systems for Easynet Group PLC. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jun 5 09:29:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA22506 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 09:29:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from beatrice.rutgers.edu (beatrice.rutgers.edu [165.230.209.143]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA22437; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 09:29:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu) Received: (from easmith@localhost) by beatrice.rutgers.edu (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id MAA15868; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 12:28:11 -0400 From: "Allen Smith" Message-Id: <9806051228.ZM15866@beatrice.rutgers.edu> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 12:28:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: "John S. Dyson" "Re: kernfs/procfs questions..." (Jun 4, 7:05pm) References: <199806050005.TAA00859@dyson.iquest.net> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail) To: dyson@FreeBSD.ORG, nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Subject: Documenting sysctls (was: Re: kernfs/procfs questions...) Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Jun 4, 7:05pm, John S. Dyson (possibly) wrote: > Nate Williams said: > > > > Do I have permission to start removing sysctl's that aren't > > > > documented/used? > > > > > > > No, in fact, I specifcally suggest that if you do, then you'll > > > be obstructing progress on the project. > > > > I specifically suggest that undocumented sysctls are *NOT* progress. > > (BTW, what exactly is specifically suggest supposed to mean. Is it like > > 'strong suggest', or 'strongly feel'?) > > > I suggest that you are welcome to document the sysctl's. Since you > seem to be able to choose which ones are valid, and which ones are > not, you can certainly document them. Please don't decline my > request, because I'll have to end up fixing any of your breakage, > and it is terribly wasteful of both of our time. > > BTW, please don't waste my time. If you want sysctl better documented, > then there is a nice project for you!!! I'll even feed answers > to your questions for you to fill in the fields. Umm... while everyone's talking about documenting sysctls, would somebody mind explaining exactly what proxyall does? From reading over the source code, I _think_ that this is what happens, but I'm not sure: A. If the machine receives an arp request for an IP address that's not one of its, and B. the arp request isn't from one of its interfaces, and C. there isn't an arp table entry saying it's supposed to broadcast something specific for an arp request for that IP address, and D. the proxyall sysctl is on, and E. it knows how to route to the IP address in question, and F. the route doesn't go out the same interface the arp request was received on, then G. it replies with the ethernet address of the interface the arp request was received on as the ethernet address to send stuff for that IP address to. If this is indeed the case, then putting documentation to this effect somewhere would be nice. With this and IP Filter's transparent forwarding capability, it appears possible to use a FreeBSD box as a L2-filtering-bridge, which would be quite nice. Thanks, -Allen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jun 5 12:39:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA27463 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 12:39:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA27444 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 12:38:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA08895; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 15:37:11 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 15:37:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199806051937.PAA08895@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: "Allen Smith" Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Documenting sysctls (was: Re: kernfs/procfs questions...) In-Reply-To: <9806051228.ZM15866@beatrice.rutgers.edu> References: <199806050005.TAA00859@dyson.iquest.net> <9806051228.ZM15866@beatrice.rutgers.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org < said: > Umm... while everyone's talking about documenting sysctls, would > somebody mind explaining exactly what proxyall does? From reading over > the source code, I _think_ that this is what happens, but I'm not sure: Let me explain what it was originally written for. Three years ago, my then-employers wanted to separate our videoconferencing network off from the main production network (mostly so that the Suns on the video net couldn't sniff passwords on the other side). At the same time, we wanted to play around with a cable-modem network that MIT cable was testing out. Since subnets on net 18 are hard to come by, we decided the best thing to do was to re-subnet our existing /16. Of course, it would have been too much of a pain to change over all the old machines, so the proxy ARP hack was born. It was only about five minutes of coding. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jun 5 14:09:06 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA14941 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 14:09:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from beatrice.rutgers.edu (beatrice.rutgers.edu [165.230.209.143]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA14612 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 14:07:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu) Received: (from easmith@localhost) by beatrice.rutgers.edu (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id RAA27360; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 17:06:13 -0400 From: "Allen Smith" Message-Id: <9806051706.ZM27358@beatrice.rutgers.edu> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 17:06:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: Garrett Wollman "Documenting sysctls (was: Re: kernfs/procfs questions...)" (Jun 5, 3:37pm) References: <199806050005.TAA00859@dyson.iquest.net> <9806051228.ZM15866@beatrice.rutgers.edu> <199806051937.PAA08895@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail) To: Garrett Wollman Subject: Re: Documenting sysctls (was: Re: kernfs/procfs questions...) Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Jun 5, 3:37pm, Garrett Wollman (possibly) wrote: > < said: > > > Umm... while everyone's talking about documenting sysctls, would > > somebody mind explaining exactly what proxyall does? From reading over > > the source code, I _think_ that this is what happens, but I'm not sure: > > Let me explain what it was originally written for. > > Three years ago, my then-employers wanted to separate our > videoconferencing network off from the main production network (mostly > so that the Suns on the video net couldn't sniff passwords on the > other side). At the same time, we wanted to play around with a > cable-modem network that MIT cable was testing out. Since subnets on > net 18 are hard to come by, we decided the best thing to do was to > re-subnet our existing /16. Of course, it would have been too much of > a pain to change over all the old machines, so the proxy ARP hack was > born. It was only about five minutes of coding. OK... but documentation as to what it does would still be nice, as per the thing (L2-filtering-bridging) that I mentioned. Does it indeed do what I thought it does? Thanks, -Allen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jun 5 19:10:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA03598 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 19:10:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id TAA03472 for ; Fri, 5 Jun 1998 19:10:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id CAA12468; Sat, 6 Jun 1998 02:31:58 +0200 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199806060031.CAA12468@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: Documenting sysctls (was: Re: kernfs/procfs questions...) To: easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu (Allen Smith) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 1998 02:31:57 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, net@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <9806051706.ZM27358@beatrice.rutgers.edu> from "Allen Smith" at Jun 5, 98 05:05:53 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > OK... but documentation as to what it does would still be nice, as per > the thing (L2-filtering-bridging) that I mentioned. Does it indeed do > what I thought it does? FreeBSD does not do any L2 bridging. There are two standalone alternatives for that, my pcbridge code (available from my web page, romable, but only supports ed-like cards) and the drawbridge stuff at http://drawbridge.tamu.edu/ Both are based on FreeBSD (pcbridge actually only uses the netboot code, but compiles under FreeBSD). remember, acting as a bridge puts a lot of load on a machine because it has to listen to all traffic on all interfaces. pcbridge saves some work by only loading to memory the header of the packet and throwing data away if the packet must not be forwarded, but a solution using the generic FreeBSD device drivers would almost surely have to load the entire packet to memory before working on it. cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message