From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Sep 12 2:54:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from dominik.saargate.de (dominik.saargate.de [212.88.132.246]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28B241525C for ; Sun, 12 Sep 1999 02:54:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from domi@saargate.de) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dominik.saargate.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA40372 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 1999 11:54:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from domi@saargate.de) Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 11:54:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Dominik Brettnacher To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: RADIUS authentication against PostgreSQL? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Is there a RADIUS server that supports authentication against a PostgreSQL database? -- Dominik - http://www.saargate.de/~domi/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Sep 12 9: 2:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from livid.globalserve.net (slam3.ican.net [142.154.79.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC3614EE4 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 1999 09:02:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nick@globalserve.net) Received: from localhost (nick@localhost) by livid.globalserve.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA81036; Sun, 12 Sep 1999 12:05:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: livid.globalserve.net: nick owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 12 Sep 1999 12:05:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Perreten To: Dominik Brettnacher Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RADIUS authentication against PostgreSQL? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Take a look at Radiator Radius. It is a commercial product but has an excellent reputation. http://www.open.com.au/radiator/ Nicolas Perreten Systems Administrator Globalserve Communications Inc., a Primus Canada Company On Sun, 12 Sep 1999, Dominik Brettnacher wrote: > Is there a RADIUS server that supports authentication against a PostgreSQL > database? > > -- > Dominik - http://www.saargate.de/~domi/ > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Sep 12 9:11: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from etinc.com (et-gw.etinc.com [207.252.1.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1E115372 for ; Sun, 12 Sep 1999 09:11:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dennis@etinc.com) Received: from workstation.etinc.com (port47.netsvr1.cst.vastnet.net [207.252.73.47]) by etinc.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA02851; Sun, 12 Sep 1999 12:07:03 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <199909121607.MAA02851@etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@mail.etinc.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 00:24:53 -0400 To: Will Andrews , "Kevin (FH Admin)" From: Dennis Subject: RE: Bandwidth Monitor? Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <00d101befbb0$ab8ccd60$0200a8c0@jedi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 10:52 PM 9/10/99 -0400, Will Andrews wrote: >On 10-Sep-99 Kevin (FH Admin) wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> I was wondering what I could use to monitor each customers traffic. I'm >> running a FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE system and have about 100 users on it, and want >> to be able to track how much bandwidth each user customer is using. (most >> importantly VIA http) Any ideas how I could easily do this? > >Use the Apache logs to determine bandwidth usage. Additionally, seek out >DUMMYNET / ipfw uid+gid. A commercial product is available that will allow you to chart traffic from each IP address and can manage thousands of addresses. Its also a full-featured bandwidth manager. www.etinc.com Dennis ------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.etinc.com T1/T3 boards for FreeBSD and Linux Multiport T1/T3 Routers Industrial Strength Bandwidth Management Solutions To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Sep 13 0:57:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from jazz.seychelles.net (jazz.seychelles.net [209.25.29.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D55DD14D25 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 00:57:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from muditha@seychelles.net) Received: from seychelles.net ([209.25.29.11]) by jazz.seychelles.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA26849; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 11:43:36 +0400 (SCT) (envelope-from muditha@seychelles.net) Message-ID: <37DCAD66.9BF2D486@seychelles.net> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 11:53:11 +0400 From: Muditha Gunatilake Reply-To: muditha@seychelles.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: list@inet-access.org, Freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: pricing question? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Guys, I just want to find out if other ISPs charge clients (dial-up and other) for providing them with fixed IP addresses. I have a few dial-up clients who require fixed IP addresses but I can't charge them the same fee as other dial-up cleints as they are eating up some of my IP addresses. I was thinking of charging them a fixed annual amount and wanted some idea of what others are charging? Thanx -- -- --------------------- Muditha Gunatilake Atlas Seychelles Ltd Phone:304060 email: muditha@seychelles.net mbh3gpa@afs.mcc.ac.uk muditha@creole.seychelles.net :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Sep 13 1: 7:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from calliope1.fm.intel.com (calliope1.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A1814EDE for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 01:07:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from robert.martin-legene@intel.com) Received: from fmsmsx26.fm.intel.com (fmsmsx26.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.26]) by calliope1.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.6 1998/11/24 22:10:56 iwep Exp iwep $) with ESMTP id BAA08638; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 01:06:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fmsmsx26.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 01:06:44 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Martin-Legene, Robert" To: "'muditha@seychelles.net'" , list@inet-access.org, Freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: pricing question? Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 01:06:24 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I just want to find out if other ISPs charge clients (dial-up and > other) for providing them with fixed IP addresses. I have a few > dial-up clients who require fixed IP addresses but I can't charge = them > the same fee as other dial-up cleints as they are eating up some of = my > IP addresses. I was thinking of charging them a fixed annual=20 > amount and > wanted some idea of what others are charging? When I worked for an ISP, a private subscriber could not be given a fixed IP. If you had a corporate dial-in you could get even blocks of IP##. Of course the price was noticably different. But private customers "doesn't need a fixed IP#" (yes, you may flame me now) ;-) -- Robert Martin-Leg=E8ne The opinions expressed are only my own, and does not reflect the opinions of Intel. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Sep 13 1:29:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from jazz.seychelles.net (jazz.seychelles.net [209.25.29.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD18F14A06 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 01:29:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from muditha@seychelles.net) Received: from seychelles.net ([209.25.29.11]) by jazz.seychelles.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA27941; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 12:15:36 +0400 (SCT) (envelope-from muditha@seychelles.net) Message-ID: <37DCB4E7.26828B4C@seychelles.net> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 12:25:11 +0400 From: Muditha Gunatilake Reply-To: muditha@seychelles.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Martin-Legene, Robert" Cc: list@inet-access.org, Freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pricing question? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The reason for this is some have machines that need to logged on to remotely for FTP, admin work and other purposes. But they do not want to be logged on permenently. "Martin-Legene, Robert" wrote: > > I just want to find out if other ISPs charge clients (dial-up and > > other) for providing them with fixed IP addresses. I have a few > > dial-up clients who require fixed IP addresses but I can't charge them > > the same fee as other dial-up cleints as they are eating up some of my > > IP addresses. I was thinking of charging them a fixed annual > > amount and > > wanted some idea of what others are charging? > > When I worked for an ISP, a private subscriber could not be given > a fixed IP. If you had a corporate dial-in you could get even blocks > of IP##. Of course the price was noticably different. But private > customers "doesn't need a fixed IP#" (yes, you may flame me now) ;-) > > -- Robert Martin-Legène > The opinions expressed are only my own, and does not reflect > the opinions of Intel. -- -- --------------------- Muditha Gunatilake Atlas Seychelles Ltd Phone:304060 email: muditha@seychelles.net mbh3gpa@afs.mcc.ac.uk muditha@creole.seychelles.net :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Sep 13 1:36:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.freebsd.org.uk [194.242.128.198]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15359155AE for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 01:36:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA31250; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 09:36:20 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost.lan.Awfulhak.org [127.0.0.1]) by keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA53625; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 09:41:17 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199909130841.JAA53625@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Martin-Legene, Robert" Cc: "'muditha@seychelles.net'" , list@inet-access.org, Freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pricing question? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 13 Sep 1999 01:06:24 PDT." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 09:41:17 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [.....] > When I worked for an ISP, a private subscriber could not be given > a fixed IP. If you had a corporate dial-in you could get even blocks > of IP##. Of course the price was noticably different. But private > customers "doesn't need a fixed IP#" (yes, you may flame me now) ;-) Ok :-) IMHO everybody needs a static IP number. I can't see any reason a = corporate would need a static IP number when a private doesn't. Of course the ``correct'' thing would be to have the NASs smart = enough to allow the client to request the IP number that they had = last time and allocate it if they can. Currently, no NASs that I = know of are smart enough to do this (except ppp(8) of course!). With lots of different pieces of hardware, each of which has a = different block of IP numbers to allocate, it becomes difficult from = the NASs point of view, but this is the same thing that we're all = faced with in an MP environment. I think they should either just = create the back-channel, or else people should put pressure on the = telcos to make them get smarter and deal with this sort of stuff at = their end (is that possible? I don't know much about how much the = telco does and how much the ISPs NAS does). As a minimum, the NAS could *at least* dish out the same IP number if = it's in the local block and is currently unused. That way people = with a dynamic IP can sometimes get lucky when they didn't mean to = let their connection time out :-] > -- Robert Martin-Leg=E8ne > The opinions expressed are only my own, and does not reflect > the opinions of Intel. -- = Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Sep 13 2: 6:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from freesbee.wheel.dk (freesbee.wheel.dk [193.162.159.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17EAA14CAE for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 02:06:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jesper@wheel.dk) Received: by freesbee.wheel.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0EE403E1B; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 11:06:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 11:06:19 +0200 From: Jesper Skriver To: Brian Somers Cc: "Martin-Legene, Robert" , "'muditha@seychelles.net'" , list@inet-access.org, Freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pricing question? Message-ID: <19990913110619.A59569@skriver.dk> References: <199909130841.JAA53625@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.96.2i In-Reply-To: <199909130841.JAA53625@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org>; from Brian Somers on Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 09:41:17AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 09:41:17AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: > [.....] > > When I worked for an ISP, a private subscriber could not be given > > a fixed IP. If you had a corporate dial-in you could get even blocks > > of IP##. Of course the price was noticably different. But private > > customers "doesn't need a fixed IP#" (yes, you may flame me now) ;-) > > Of course the ``correct'' thing would be to have the NASs smart > enough to allow the client to request the IP number that they had > last time and allocate it if they can. Currently, no NASs that I > know of are smart enough to do this (except ppp(8) of course!). Cisco AS5300 does exactly this. The user doesn't even has to request it, if the IP number the customer had the last time, is available the customer gets them same number. /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver (JS4261-RIPE), Network manager Tele Danmark DataNet, IP section (AS3292) One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Sep 13 2:38: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from hubbub.ths.tased.edu.au (hubbub.ths.tased.edu.au [147.41.136.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5424314DB1 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 02:37:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shonson@planetquake.com) Received: from omega (dhcp162.ths.tased.edu.au [147.41.136.162]) by hubbub.ths.tased.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id TAA20288 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 19:38:00 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from shonson@planetquake.com) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990913193714.007cbb80@mail.planetquake.com> X-Sender: shonson@mail.planetquake.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 19:37:14 +1000 To: From: Steven Honson Subject: Re: pricing question? In-Reply-To: <19990913110619.A59569@skriver.dk> References: <199909130841.JAA53625@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> <199909130841.JAA53625@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Another way around giving users static ip's would be to write a small dynamic dns daemon that assigns users a host name which is updated when ever a user dials up, this could be done by hacking pppd and writing a small perl/c program that updates a BIND zone file. Of course that could only be done if you used FreeBSD/Linux systems. You could use the naming sceme, username.cust.myisp.net Just a idea, Steven Honson At 11:06 AM 9/13/99 +0200, you wrote: >On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 09:41:17AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: >> [.....] >> > When I worked for an ISP, a private subscriber could not be given >> > a fixed IP. If you had a corporate dial-in you could get even blocks >> > of IP##. Of course the price was noticably different. But private >> > customers "doesn't need a fixed IP#" (yes, you may flame me now) ;-) >> >> Of course the ``correct'' thing would be to have the NASs smart >> enough to allow the client to request the IP number that they had >> last time and allocate it if they can. Currently, no NASs that I >> know of are smart enough to do this (except ppp(8) of course!). > >Cisco AS5300 does exactly this. The user doesn't even has to request it, >if the IP number the customer had the last time, is available the >customer gets them same number. > >/Jesper > >-- >Jesper Skriver (JS4261-RIPE), Network manager >Tele Danmark DataNet, IP section (AS3292) > >One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, >One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them. > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > --------------------------------------- Steven Honson Internet Technologist & Consultant Taroona High School, Australia shonson@hubbub.ths.tased.edu.au To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Sep 13 3: 5:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.freebsd.org.uk [194.242.128.198]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C7614FEA for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 03:05:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA32148; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 11:04:58 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost.lan.Awfulhak.org [127.0.0.1]) by keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA54359; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 11:09:55 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199909131009.LAA54359@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Jesper Skriver Cc: Brian Somers , "Martin-Legene, Robert" , "'muditha@seychelles.net'" , list@inet-access.org, Freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pricing question? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 13 Sep 1999 11:06:19 +0200." <19990913110619.A59569@skriver.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 11:09:55 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 09:41:17AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: > > [.....] > > > When I worked for an ISP, a private subscriber could not be given > > > a fixed IP. If you had a corporate dial-in you could get even blocks > > > of IP##. Of course the price was noticably different. But private > > > customers "doesn't need a fixed IP#" (yes, you may flame me now) ;-) > > > > Of course the ``correct'' thing would be to have the NASs smart > > enough to allow the client to request the IP number that they had > > last time and allocate it if they can. Currently, no NASs that I > > know of are smart enough to do this (except ppp(8) of course!). > > Cisco AS5300 does exactly this. The user doesn't even has to request it, > if the IP number the customer had the last time, is available the > customer gets them same number. Excellent ! I feel a precedent coming on :-) > /Jesper > > -- > Jesper Skriver (JS4261-RIPE), Network manager > Tele Danmark DataNet, IP section (AS3292) > > One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, > One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them. > -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Sep 13 3: 8:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from three.overmind.ch (three.overmind.ch [194.191.120.154]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E4A14FEA for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 03:08:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pajarola@cybertime.ch) Received: from tiamat.dlc.cybertime.ch (gw1-03.cybertime.ch [194.191.120.163]) by three.overmind.ch (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA44305 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 12:08:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pajarola@cybertime.ch) Message-Id: <4.1.19990913114238.00a74c10@mail.cybertime.ch> X-Sender: pajarola@shrike.overmind.ch X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 12:07:57 +0200 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: Rico Pajarola Subject: Re: pricing question? In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19990913193714.007cbb80@mail.planetquake.com> References: <19990913110619.A59569@skriver.dk> <199909130841.JAA53625@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> <199909130841.JAA53625@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org i think the original question was not how to fake static ip's, but how to charge for them... it depends on how many static ip's they want: if it's a whole block, we charge them for filling out the application form for ripe (i think in us it's arin, www.arin.net) and the setup of routes, talkin to our backbone provider etc. If they can't convince ripe to give them a block of ip addresses, because they can't justify having a whole block (16 addresses) or because they have no real reason at all, we charge them a monthly fee for giving them one of *our* precious ip addresses. --Rico Pajarola At 19:37 13.09.99 +1000, you wrote: >Another way around giving users static ip's would be to write a small >dynamic dns daemon that assigns users a host name which is updated when >ever a user dials up, this could be done by hacking pppd and writing a >small perl/c program that updates a BIND zone file. Of course that could >only be done if you used FreeBSD/Linux systems. >You could use the naming sceme, username.cust.myisp.net >Just a idea, >Steven Honson > >At 11:06 AM 9/13/99 +0200, you wrote: >>On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 09:41:17AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: >>> [.....] >>> > When I worked for an ISP, a private subscriber could not be given >>> > a fixed IP. If you had a corporate dial-in you could get even blocks >>> > of IP##. Of course the price was noticably different. But private >>> > customers "doesn't need a fixed IP#" (yes, you may flame me now) ;-) >>> >>> Of course the ``correct'' thing would be to have the NASs smart >>> enough to allow the client to request the IP number that they had >>> last time and allocate it if they can. Currently, no NASs that I >>> know of are smart enough to do this (except ppp(8) of course!). >> >>Cisco AS5300 does exactly this. The user doesn't even has to request it, >>if the IP number the customer had the last time, is available the >>customer gets them same number. >> >>/Jesper >> >>-- >>Jesper Skriver (JS4261-RIPE), Network manager >>Tele Danmark DataNet, IP section (AS3292) >> >>One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, >>One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them. >> >> >>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >>with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message >> >--------------------------------------- >Steven Honson >Internet Technologist & Consultant >Taroona High School, Australia >shonson@hubbub.ths.tased.edu.au > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Sep 13 3: 9: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.freebsd.org.uk [194.242.128.198]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6693415549 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 03:08:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA32199; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 11:08:47 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost.lan.Awfulhak.org [127.0.0.1]) by keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA54420; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 11:13:45 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199909131013.LAA54420@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Steven Honson Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pricing question? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 13 Sep 1999 19:37:14 +1000." <3.0.5.32.19990913193714.007cbb80@mail.planetquake.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 11:13:45 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I do a similar thing myself, but it's not a great ``general'' solution as you end up with lots of names with very small DNS ttls. > Another way around giving users static ip's would be to write a small > dynamic dns daemon that assigns users a host name which is updated when > ever a user dials up, this could be done by hacking pppd and writing a > small perl/c program that updates a BIND zone file. Of course that could > only be done if you used FreeBSD/Linux systems. > You could use the naming sceme, username.cust.myisp.net > Just a idea, > Steven Honson > > At 11:06 AM 9/13/99 +0200, you wrote: > >On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 09:41:17AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: > >> [.....] > >> > When I worked for an ISP, a private subscriber could not be given > >> > a fixed IP. If you had a corporate dial-in you could get even blocks > >> > of IP##. Of course the price was noticably different. But private > >> > customers "doesn't need a fixed IP#" (yes, you may flame me now) ;-) > >> > >> Of course the ``correct'' thing would be to have the NASs smart > >> enough to allow the client to request the IP number that they had > >> last time and allocate it if they can. Currently, no NASs that I > >> know of are smart enough to do this (except ppp(8) of course!). > > > >Cisco AS5300 does exactly this. The user doesn't even has to request it, > >if the IP number the customer had the last time, is available the > >customer gets them same number. > > > >/Jesper > > > >-- > >Jesper Skriver (JS4261-RIPE), Network manager > >Tele Danmark DataNet, IP section (AS3292) > > > >One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, > >One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them. > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > > --------------------------------------- > Steven Honson > Internet Technologist & Consultant > Taroona High School, Australia > shonson@hubbub.ths.tased.edu.au -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Sep 13 3:23:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.SKINNYHIPPO.COM (mail.SKINNYHIPPO.COM [216.25.13.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BE515047 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 03:23:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from panda@skinnyhippo.com) Received: from egg [202.96.51.68] by mail.SKINNYHIPPO.COM (SMTPD32-5.05) id A0CABF50208; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 06:24:10 -0400 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990913185752.00ad3290@mail.skinnyhippo.com> X-Sender: panda@mail.skinnyhippo.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 18:57:52 +0800 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: chas Subject: managing huge log files. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org One of the websites I manage went ballistic 2 weeks ago and has been producing 500+ MB of Apache logs each day. May I ask how people are managing their log files on high-traffic sites ? Performance is key to me so I'm wary of running log analysis software (such as analog) on the server if there's even the possibility of it degrading performance. For the same reason I haven't been doing real-time analysis though I'm not sure if that's valid or not. I've been rotating the logs daily, gzipping and moving off the server but marketing bods want to have log analyses done over the entire month (which is fair enough) as opposed to daily reports. This could work out at 16 GB log files/month once the daily reports are all concat'ed. cheers, chas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Sep 13 5: 6:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from jazz.seychelles.net (jazz.seychelles.net [209.25.29.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6747514FE0 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 05:06:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from muditha@seychelles.net) Received: from seychelles.net ([209.25.29.11]) by jazz.seychelles.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA04147; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 15:52:05 +0400 (SCT) (envelope-from muditha@seychelles.net) Message-ID: <37DCE7A3.EF9B431E@seychelles.net> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 16:01:39 +0400 From: Muditha Gunatilake Reply-To: muditha@seychelles.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rico Pajarola , freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pricing question? References: <19990913110619.A59569@skriver.dk> <199909130841.JAA53625@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> <199909130841.JAA53625@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> <4.1.19990913114238.00a74c10@mail.cybertime.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thank you....you are right on this issue...we are the only service provider in the Country...we do run FBSD :-)..but our population is only 80,000 hence our customer base is very small....compared most isps. We are not the PTT which is C & W :-(...and we go through them and they have only given us one class C. :-(,...so IP addresses are indeed very precious to me. I have many times written to arin and also to apnic and due to routing issues and also our small population we did not qualify for a higher class which meant I had to get IP addresses from my uplink provider (C& w). When Afrinic (for Africa) is formed I hope I will stand a better chance to get some IP addresses for us. I do use NAT for company networks etc and this is normally included on our lease lines rates....but some dial-up clients require this so the support people can login or for FTP transfers etc....these are not that many...but I wanted to get and idea how much to charge them on top of the normal dial-up tarrifs.:-) Thanx for all the replies Rico Pajarola wrote: > i think the original question was not how to fake static ip's, but how to > charge for them... > it depends on how many static ip's they want: if it's a whole block, we > charge them for filling out the application form for ripe (i think in us > it's arin, www.arin.net) and the setup of routes, talkin to our backbone > provider etc. > If they can't convince ripe to give them a block of ip addresses, because > they can't justify having a whole block (16 addresses) or because they have > no real reason at all, we charge them a monthly fee for giving them one of > *our* precious ip addresses. > > --Rico Pajarola > > At 19:37 13.09.99 +1000, you wrote: > >Another way around giving users static ip's would be to write a small > >dynamic dns daemon that assigns users a host name which is updated when > >ever a user dials up, this could be done by hacking pppd and writing a > >small perl/c program that updates a BIND zone file. Of course that could > >only be done if you used FreeBSD/Linux systems. > >You could use the naming sceme, username.cust.myisp.net > >Just a idea, > >Steven Honson > > > >At 11:06 AM 9/13/99 +0200, you wrote: > >>On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 09:41:17AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: > >>> [.....] > >>> > When I worked for an ISP, a private subscriber could not be given > >>> > a fixed IP. If you had a corporate dial-in you could get even blocks > >>> > of IP##. Of course the price was noticably different. But private > >>> > customers "doesn't need a fixed IP#" (yes, you may flame me now) ;-) > >>> > >>> Of course the ``correct'' thing would be to have the NASs smart > >>> enough to allow the client to request the IP number that they had > >>> last time and allocate it if they can. Currently, no NASs that I > >>> know of are smart enough to do this (except ppp(8) of course!). > >> > >>Cisco AS5300 does exactly this. The user doesn't even has to request it, > >>if the IP number the customer had the last time, is available the > >>customer gets them same number. > >> > >>/Jesper > >> > >>-- > >>Jesper Skriver (JS4261-RIPE), Network manager > >>Tele Danmark DataNet, IP section (AS3292) > >> > >>One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, > >>One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them. > >> > >> > >>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >>with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > >> > >--------------------------------------- > >Steven Honson > >Internet Technologist & Consultant > >Taroona High School, Australia > >shonson@hubbub.ths.tased.edu.au > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message -- -- --------------------- Muditha Gunatilake Atlas Seychelles Ltd Phone:304060 email: muditha@seychelles.net mbh3gpa@afs.mcc.ac.uk muditha@creole.seychelles.net :-) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Sep 13 5:24:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from calliope1.fm.intel.com (calliope1.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E7515549 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 05:24:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from robert.martin-legene@intel.com) Received: from fmsmsx29.FM.INTEL.COM (fmsmsx29.fm.intel.com [132.233.42.29]) by calliope1.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.6 1998/11/24 22:10:56 iwep Exp iwep $) with ESMTP id FAA03119; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 05:24:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by fmsmsx29.fm.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 05:24:04 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Martin-Legene, Robert" To: "'muditha@seychelles.net'" , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: pricing question? Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 05:23:58 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org If you need IP-numbers, these should be assigned to you, no matter where in the world you are. If you can't become a registry with ARIN/RIPE/(APNIC) yourself, then you'll have to rely on C&W's speed in handling your IP-requests. I just hope for you that you have good relations with your ISP (uplink) then. Good luck. -- Robert Martin-Leg=E8ne This is still not Intel's opinions, but my own. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Sep 13 5:58: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from silver.komanda.com.ua (silver.komanda.com.ua [212.68.162.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD57F14C9D for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 05:57:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sysop@komanda.com.ua) Received: from silver.komanda.com.ua (silver.komanda.com.ua [212.68.162.138]) by silver.komanda.com.ua (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id PAA02039; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 15:56:16 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from sysop@komanda.com.ua) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 15:56:16 +0300 (EEST) From: Alex Bulygin To: Brian Somers Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: User PPP stop suddenly In-Reply-To: <199909101411.PAA44190@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > > > Sep 10 14:47:36 silver ppp[19270]: Phase: 19260 -> 19270: Dropped session control > > Sep 10 14:47:36 silver ppp[19270]: Phase: deflink: lcp -> closed > > Sep 10 14:47:36 silver ppp[19270]: Phase: bundle: Dead > > Sep 10 14:47:36 silver ppp[19270]: Phase: deflink: Carrier lost > > Sep 10 14:47:36 silver ppp[19270]: Phase: PPP Terminated (normal). > > You'll need to provide more of the log. The above isn't relevant - > ppp only drops session control after the link has either been closed > or transferred to another running ppp. Can you also enable LCP and > IPCP logs ? Oh, now its OK! User just misconfigured tcp/ip propeties in win95 network settings. Ive found it when I even couldnt able to ping that PC. Thanks for help. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Sep 13 8:12:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from dominik.saargate.de (dominik.saargate.de [212.88.132.246]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2709414C12 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 08:12:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from domi@saargate.de) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dominik.saargate.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA63557; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 17:11:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from domi@saargate.de) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 1999 17:11:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Dominik Brettnacher To: "panda@skinnyhippo.com" Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: managing huge log files. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, panda@skinnyhippo.com wrote: > One of the websites I manage went ballistic 2 weeks > ago and has been producing 500+ MB of Apache logs > each day. May I ask how people are managing their > log files on high-traffic sites ? Use a log analyzer that brings its own history support with it (e.g. Webalizer) - then you can rotate your logs daily or hourly while making recent statistics from it. After that you can zip then or throw them away. Don't forget to give Apache a HUP, or better a USR1, so that it creates new log files when the old ones are moved to another directory. -- Dominik - http://www.saargate.de/~domi/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Sep 13 8:58:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.SKINNYHIPPO.COM (mail.SKINNYHIPPO.COM [216.25.13.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187CE1504B for ; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 08:58:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from panda@skinnyhippo.com) Received: from egg [210.72.251.153] by mail.SKINNYHIPPO.COM (SMTPD32-5.05) id AF4B13A001D6; Mon, 13 Sep 1999 11:59:07 -0400 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990914002139.00adfe90@mail.skinnyhippo.com> X-Sender: panda@mail.skinnyhippo.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 00:21:39 +0800 To: Dominik Brettnacher From: chas Subject: Re: managing huge log files. Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 05:11 PM 9/13/99 +0200, Dominik Brettnacher wrote: >On Mon, 13 Sep 1999, panda@skinnyhippo.com wrote: > >> One of the websites I manage went ballistic 2 weeks >> ago and has been producing 500+ MB of Apache logs >> each day. May I ask how people are managing their >> log files on high-traffic sites ? > >Use a log analyzer that brings its own history support with it That's what I was looking for ... > (e.g. >Webalizer) .. and that looks like just the ticket - very impressive. > - then you can rotate your logs daily or hourly while making >recent statistics from it. > >Don't forget to give Apache a HUP, or better a USR1, so that it creates >new log files when the old ones are moved to another directory. Thank you very much. chas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 14 3:25:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from cronus.medianetwork.se (cronus.medianetwork.se [193.14.204.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B11E151A3 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 03:25:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from support@junglenote.com) Received: from junglenote.com (digital21.medianetwork.se [193.14.204.239]) by cronus.medianetwork.se (8.9.3/8.7) with ESMTP id MAA16943 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 12:25:37 +0200 Received: from enigmatic [127.0.0.1] by junglenote.com [localhost] with SMTP (MDaemon.v2.84.R) for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 12:29:27 +0200 Received: by localhost with Microsoft MAPI; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 12:29:26 +0200 Message-ID: <01BEFEAC.C8B72B70.support@junglenote.com> From: Dan Larsson To: "[FreeBSD-ISP-List] (E-post)" Subject: db auth. w/ uw imap-4.5 (pop3 daemon) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 12:29:26 +0200 Organization: Portabla Datorer AB X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet-e-post/MAPI - 8.0.0.4211 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Return-Path: support@junglenote.com Reply-To: support@junglenote.com Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org My intentions are to use a database for username , password and homepath (the mail gets stored in the users home for quota purposes) instead of the passwd file. Has anyone done this with the imap-4.x daemon from the University of Washington? If so or something similar please let me know Thanks! Regards ---- Dan Larsson ( mailto:dan@junglenote.com ) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 14 7:25:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from gate.saargate.de (gate.saargate.de [212.88.128.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 746BF14A28 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 07:25:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from domi@saargate.de) Message-id: Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 16:21:48 +0200 Subject: copy of incoming mail to another account To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: domi@saargate.de (domi) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org How can I send a copy of an incoming mail to a unix account to another mail account? I know about the possibility of setting up .forward files, but using those, the mails are only redirected, but not copied. Yours, Dominik To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 14 7:35:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from pau-amma.whistle.com (pau-amma.whistle.com [207.76.205.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E7214E37 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 07:35:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dhw@whistle.com) Received: (from dhw@localhost) by pau-amma.whistle.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id HAA79178; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 07:35:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 07:35:18 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <199909141435.HAA79178@pau-amma.whistle.com> To: domi@saargate.de, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: copy of incoming mail to another account In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 16:21:48 +0200 >From: domi@saargate.de (domi) >How can I send a copy of an incoming mail to a unix account to another >mail account? I know about the possibility of setting up .forward files, >but using those, the mails are only redirected, but not copied. Assuming a sendmail (work-alike) MTA, in /etc/aliases: foo: \foo, bar will cause mail sent to "foo" to be delivered to "foo" and a copy sent to "bar". Season with "newlalias" to taste. Cheers, david -- David Wolfskill dhw@whistle.com UNIX System Administrator voice: (650) 577-7158 pager: (888) 347-0197 FAX: (650) 372-5915 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 14 7:35:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from volodya.prime.net.ua (volodya.prime.net.ua [195.64.229.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EABF150CC for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 07:35:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andyo@prime.net.ua) Received: from prime.net.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by volodya.prime.net.ua (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA02110; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 17:36:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from andyo@prime.net.ua) Message-ID: <37DE5D6E.FC2A2C1A@prime.net.ua> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 17:36:31 +0300 From: "Andy V. Oleynik" Organization: M-Info X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en, ru, uk MIME-Version: 1.0 To: domi Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: copy of incoming mail to another account References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org What about to use /etc/aliases? Just define for given user himself and another address. man 5 aliases domi wrote: > How can I send a copy of an incoming mail to a unix account to another > mail account? I know about the possibility of setting up .forward files, > but using those, the mails are only redirected, but not copied. > > Yours, Dominik > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message -- WBW Andy V. Oleynik (When U work in virtual office prime.net.ua's U have good chance to obtain system administrator virtual money ö%-) +380442448363 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 14 7:37: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ender.ncsa.es (ender.ncsa.es [194.179.50.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C1514CC5 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 07:36:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jesusr@ncsa.es) Received: from ender.ncsa.es (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ender.ncsa.es (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA01790; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 16:37:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jesusr@ncsa.es) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 16:37:02 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: jesusr@ncsa.es Organization: Nexus Comunicaciones, S.A. From: Jesus Rodriguez To: (domi) Subject: RE: copy of incoming mail to another account Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 14-Sep-99 domi wrote: > How can I send a copy of an incoming mail to a unix account to another > mail account? I know about the possibility of setting up .forward files, > but using those, the mails are only redirected, but not copied. Use /etc/aliases or virtusertable. Saludos JesusR. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 14 7:40:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.trace.net.tw (mail.trace.net.tw [202.80.128.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4118B15292 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 07:40:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ronald@mail.trace.net.tw) X-Comments: ****** Message sent through an Trace account ****** X-http: ****** http://www.trace.com.tw ****** Received: from localhost (ronald@localhost) by mail.trace.net.tw (8.9.0/8.9.0) with SMTP id WAA06307; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 22:39:15 +0800 Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 22:39:15 +0800 (CST) From: Ronald Wiplinger To: David Wolfskill Cc: domi@saargate.de, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: copy of incoming mail to another account In-Reply-To: <199909141435.HAA79178@pau-amma.whistle.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, David Wolfskill wrote: > >Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 16:21:48 +0200 > >From: domi@saargate.de (domi) > > >How can I send a copy of an incoming mail to a unix account to another > >mail account? I know about the possibility of setting up .forward files, > >but using those, the mails are only redirected, but not copied. > > Assuming a sendmail (work-alike) MTA, in /etc/aliases: > > foo: \foo, bar > > will cause mail sent to "foo" to be delivered to "foo" and a copy sent > to "bar". Works fine, ... HOWEVER, if it should be a secrete it will be a problem, since a RETURN-RECEIPT-REQUEST send you also a return receipt from the second e-mail address. Better solution would be to use procmail filter mechanism, where you can rewrite the message, or just append to a file, which in return could be just the mail file of the second email address, ... > > Season with "newlalias" to taste. > > Cheers, > david > -- > David Wolfskill dhw@whistle.com UNIX System Administrator > voice: (650) 577-7158 pager: (888) 347-0197 FAX: (650) 372-5915 > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 14 7:43: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from dns.MexComUSA.net (cm4094.cableco-op.com [208.138.40.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE80150E8 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 07:42:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eculp@MexComUSA.net) Received: from MexComUSA.net (cm-208-138-47-186.cableco-op.ispchannel.com [208.138.47.186]) by dns.MexComUSA.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA52066; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 07:42:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eculp@MexComUSA.net) Message-ID: <37DE5EE6.D656D478@MexComUSA.net> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 14:42:46 +0000 From: Edwin Culp Organization: Mexico Communicates X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: domi Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: copy of incoming mail to another account References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org domi wrote: > How can I send a copy of an incoming mail to a unix account to another > mail account? I know about the possibility of setting up .forward files, > but using those, the mails are only redirected, but not copied. > > Yours, Dominik > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message with aliases As user root if you add this line in /etc/aliases domi: domi@saargate.de, domi@usa.net, domi@hotmail.com, domi@yahoo.com, webmaster@saargate.de then do a # newaliases it should respond something like /etc/aliases: 157 aliases, longest 265 bytes, 6659 bytes total now mail to domi at the smtp server would be sent to each of the above accounts. provecho, ed To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 14 12:31: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from quaggy.ursine.com (lambda.blueneptune.com [209.133.45.179]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CFDC15187 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 12:30:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fbsd-isp@ursine.com) Received: from michael (lambda.ursine.com [209.133.45.69]) by quaggy.ursine.com (8.9.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA19070; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 12:30:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <199909141230520520.1AC93032@quaggy.ursine.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.00.00.13 (2) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 12:30:52 -0700 From: "Michael Bryan" To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Cc: domi@saargate.de Subject: Re: copy of incoming mail to another account Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >How can I send a copy of an incoming mail to a unix account to another >mail account? I know about the possibility of setting up .forward files, >but using those, the mails are only redirected, but not copied. You can use the .forward file to copy as well, allowing delivery to both the original addressee as well as the remote address. Do something like this: ~localuser/.forward: \localuser,remote@domain.com That will cause the mail to be copied to the address "remote@domain.com" while still doing the local delivery to the mailbox for "localuser". The user can set this up on their own if they want. You can also use /etc/aliases to get the same effect, but that requires an admin to set things up for them. Michael Bryan fbsd-isp@ursine.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 14 12:43:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from dominik.saargate.de (dominik.saargate.de [212.88.132.246]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78ED215206 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 12:40:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from domi@saargate.de) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dominik.saargate.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA68543; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 21:39:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from domi@saargate.de) Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 21:39:50 +0200 (CEST) From: Dominik Brettnacher To: "fbsd-isp@ursine.com" Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: copy of incoming mail to another account In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, fbsd-isp@ursine.com wrote: > You can use the .forward file to copy as well, allowing delivery to > both the original addressee as well as the remote address. Do something > like this: > > ~localuser/.forward: > > \localuser,remote@domain.com Why is the backslash needed? -- Dominik - http://www.saargate.de/~domi/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 14 17: 8:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.theinternet.com.au (zeus.theinternet.com.au [203.34.176.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827D115305 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 17:08:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from akm@mail.theinternet.com.au) Received: (from akm@localhost) by mail.theinternet.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA07360; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 10:10:26 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from akm) From: Andrew Kenneth Milton Message-Id: <199909150010.KAA07360@mail.theinternet.com.au> Subject: Re: copy of incoming mail to another account In-Reply-To: from domi at "Sep 14, 1999 4:21:48 pm" To: domi@saargate.de (domi) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 10:10:26 +1000 (EST) Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org +----[ domi ]--------------------------------------------- | How can I send a copy of an incoming mail to a unix account to another | mail account? I know about the possibility of setting up .forward files, | but using those, the mails are only redirected, but not copied. You can get .forward files to copy:- otheraccount@other.isp \myaccount The \ will stop .forward expansion ( so no loops). -- Totally Holistic Enterprises Internet| P:+61 7 3870 0066 | Andrew The Internet (Aust) Pty Ltd | F:+61 7 3870 4477 | Milton ACN: 082 081 472 | M:+61 416 022 411 |72 Col .Sig PO Box 837 Indooroopilly QLD 4068 |akm@theinternet.com.au|Specialist To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 14 17:54:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from maild.telia.com (maild.telia.com [194.22.190.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377CC152AC for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 17:54:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Received: from stordatan.telia.com (t2o62p50.telia.com [195.198.198.110]) by maild.telia.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA28858 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 02:54:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from partitur.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stordatan.telia.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA08753 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 02:53:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Message-ID: <37DEEE20.69C0958D@partitur.se> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 02:53:52 +0200 From: Palle Girgensohn Organization: Partitur X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.0.36 i386) X-Accept-Language: sv, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: fxp0: device timeout Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi! fxp0: device timeout... I suppose this probably means that the network is statured, right? Are there any problems running fxp0 in full duplex? This machine is running at a client's site, and they complain it's slow, still the CPU is idle and I get the impression their entire LAN is completely satured. They had problems starting the machine in full duplex so they set the NIC up in simplex (by configuring the network switch it is connected to). Can they just pull the rj45 LAN connection, reconfig the switch and put the cord back in, or do they need to do a ifconfig down && ifconfig up? FreeBSD-3-STABLE from beginning of July. 2 proc SMP, 400 MHz, lots of RAM. Thanks for any input. /Palle To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 14 20:58:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from drip.puddle.net (cx288885-b.okcs1.ok.home.com [24.4.98.148]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B4514C42 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 20:58:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from river@theriver.nu) Received: by cx288885-b.okcs1.ok.home.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) id ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 23:03:32 -0500 Message-ID: <21DC5E98AE1FD311B1290020AFDB6C6E63D1@cx288885-b.okcs1.ok.home.com> From: river To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: RE: fxp0: device timeout Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 23:03:31 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org It sounds as if they have the switch and the netcard config'd differently. I.E. switch half duplex and NIC full duplex or vice versa. I have seen this before and it causes horrible network performance just like you are describing. If the NIC is set to 100mb full duplex have them check the switch. Also, fxp0's are notorious for not detecting full duplex, check the log files if it is set to auto-detect.... hope this helps -----Original Message----- From: Palle Girgensohn [mailto:girgen@partitur.se] Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 1999 7:54 PM To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: fxp0: device timeout Hi! fxp0: device timeout... I suppose this probably means that the network is statured, right? Are there any problems running fxp0 in full duplex? This machine is running at a client's site, and they complain it's slow, still the CPU is idle and I get the impression their entire LAN is completely satured. They had problems starting the machine in full duplex so they set the NIC up in simplex (by configuring the network switch it is connected to). Can they just pull the rj45 LAN connection, reconfig the switch and put the cord back in, or do they need to do a ifconfig down && ifconfig up? FreeBSD-3-STABLE from beginning of July. 2 proc SMP, 400 MHz, lots of RAM. Thanks for any input. /Palle To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 14 21:34:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from arnold.neland.dk (mail.neland.dk [194.255.12.232]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCEC515033 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 21:34:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arnold.neland.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA15047; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 06:37:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 06:37:49 +0200 (CEST) From: Leif Neland To: Jesus Rodriguez Cc: domi@saargate.de, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: copy of incoming mail to another account In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Jesus Rodriguez wrote: > > On 14-Sep-99 domi wrote: > > How can I send a copy of an incoming mail to a unix account to another > > mail account? I know about the possibility of setting up .forward files, > > but using those, the mails are only redirected, but not copied. > > Use /etc/aliases or virtusertable. > Not virtusertable. You can have only one adress on the right. Not like /etc/aliases, where you can have many. Leif To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Sep 14 23:21:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (wya-oe16.hotmail.com [207.82.253.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9E2F150AF for ; Tue, 14 Sep 1999 23:21:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hmoghadam@hotmail.com) Received: (qmail 87947 invoked by uid 65534); 15 Sep 1999 06:21:22 -0000 Message-ID: <19990915062122.87946.qmail@hotmail.com> X-Originating-IP: [195.146.63.195] From: "Hamid Moghadam" To: Subject: OFF TOPIC, V.35 cross ... Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 10:50:43 +0430 Organization: Iran OnLine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dear guys Sorry for being very off topic but I nead the information urgently. Where can I find the pin assignment for V.35 cross connection ? V.35 ( DCE ) <=> V.35 ( DCE ) Thanks for every thing. - Hamid To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 15 2: 2:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from www.yore.net (www.yore.net [38.193.45.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDFB1501F for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 02:01:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rbagby@yore.net) Received: from raybagby (nas1-07.yore.net [38.193.45.21]) by www.yore.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id EAA17948 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 04:00:18 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <00ce01beff59$1f7535e0$152dc126@raybagby> From: "Ray Bagby" To: Subject: more isp lists Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 04:03:04 -0500 Organization: yore.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Greetings, Right off the bat I want to say I'm sorry for the off topic e-mail but I know of no other folks to ask and I thought since this list is for ISPers anyway...... The question is: Are there any other lists or groups or organizations for ISP folks. I have concerns from marketing to website designs of which I would like other views. Thanks! past present and future! Ray To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 15 2:13:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from altair.mailwizards.com (capella.mailwizards.com [210.226.139.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 329E41501F for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 02:13:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marc@mailwizards.com) Received: from mailwizards.com (antares.mailwizards.com [210.226.139.156]) by altair.mailwizards.com (8.9.3/8.9.3-MW-1.1.3) with ESMTP id SAA18733; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 18:13:30 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <37DF6338.3380DA66@mailwizards.com> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 18:13:28 +0900 From: Marc Bradshaw Organization: Mailwizards Ltd X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ray Bagby Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: more isp lists References: <00ce01beff59$1f7535e0$152dc126@raybagby> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Ray Bagby wrote: > > Greetings, > Right off the bat I want to say I'm sorry for the off topic e-mail but I > know of no other folks to ask and I thought since this list is for ISPers > anyway...... > The question is: > Are there any other lists or groups or organizations for ISP > folks. I have concerns from marketing to website designs of which I would > like other views. > > Thanks! past present and future! > Ray > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message Try inet-access. Send 'subscribe' in the body to 'list-request@inet-access.net' to join. You may want to watch it for a while before you post, it does have it's own special flavor. -- Marc Bradshaw | From the information highway code :- System Administrator | IP travels at the speed of light..... Mailwizards Limited | Stopping distance: 4 years, 3 months. http://www.mailwizards.com | Thinking distance: a fortnight. -AFRD To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 15 2:16:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from imap.ncsa.es (imap.ncsa.es [194.179.50.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDF6814F49 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 02:16:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jesusr@chuck.jerocu.net) Received: from chuck.jerocu.net (chuck.jerocu.net [194.224.235.59]) by imap.ncsa.es (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA09895; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 11:16:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from jesusr@localhost) by chuck.jerocu.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA01229; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 11:18:10 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 11:18:10 +0200 (CEST) Reply-To: jesusr@ncsa.es Organization: Nexus Comunicaciones, S.A. From: Jesus Rodriguez To: Leif Neland Subject: RE: copy of incoming mail to another account Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, domi@saargate.de Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 15-Sep-99 Leif Neland wrote: >> On 14-Sep-99 domi wrote: >> > How can I send a copy of an incoming mail to a unix account to another >> > mail account? I know about the possibility of setting up .forward files, >> > but using those, the mails are only redirected, but not copied. >> >> Use /etc/aliases or virtusertable. >> > Not virtusertable. You can have only one adress on the right. Not like > /etc/aliases, where you can have many. Ouch!... you are right. Answering too fast without thinking completly first. Thanks. JesusR. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 15 6:37:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.sminter.com.ar (ns1.via-net-works.net.ar [200.10.100.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77B9614E5C for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 06:37:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fpscha@ns1.sminter.com.ar) Received: (from fpscha@localhost) by ns1.sminter.com.ar (8.8.5/8.8.4) id KAA15642 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 10:38:15 -0300 (GMT) From: Fernando Schapachnik Message-Id: <199909151338.KAA15642@ns1.sminter.com.ar> Subject: SMTP load balancing To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 10:38:15 -0300 (GMT) Reply-To: Fernando Schapachnik X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello: I've a situation on which I need some help. We're running a busy mail server, now on a Sun. As vertical scalability is very expensive I'm considering building an -individually inexpensive- FreeBSD cluster. What I'm certain about is that I don't what to use NFS, because of all the problem it generates (locking, etc.). I thought about building something like: +-----------+ +----- Server 1 | Front end | | | DNS MX |--------+----- Server 2 +-----------+ | +----- Server ... | +----- Server n The idea is that there is one machine pointed by the MX record that receives incoming mail and distributes it between the other servers. Some problems arise: a) The front end still has to manage the huge amount of incoming mail. b) Uniform POP3 access to mailboxes under the same name becomes imposible. Another posibility would be to have something like +-------------+ +-------------+ +---------------+ +-------------+ | Front end 1 | | Front end 2 | | Front end ... | | Front end n | +-------------+ +-------------+ +---------------+ +-------------+ | | | | +---------------+---------+---------+-----------------+ | +------------+ | Disk array | +------------+ But... such a thing exists? I mean: an external disk array that can be mounted by several FreeBSD machines at the same time. I think not. May be replacing the disk array by another machine, which has the file repository and is the POP3 server? I would really aprettiate any comment or suggestion. Thanks for your time! Fernando P. Schapachnik Administración de la red VIA Net Works Argentina SA Diagonal Roque Sáenz Peña 971, 4º y 5º piso. 1035 - Capital Federal, Argentina. (54-11) 4323-3333 http://www.via-net-works.net.ar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 15 7:26:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from dt014nb6.san.rr.com (dt014nb6.san.rr.com [24.30.129.182]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986CD1536A for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 07:25:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt014nb6.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA13041; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 07:41:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <37DFAEB6.52B009D0@gorean.org> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 07:35:35 -0700 From: Doug Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT-0913 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hamid Moghadam Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC, V.35 cross ... References: <19990915062122.87946.qmail@hotmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hamid Moghadam wrote: > > Dear guys > > Sorry for being very off topic but I nead the information urgently. > Where can I find the pin assignment for V.35 cross connection ? > V.35 ( DCE ) <=> V.35 ( DCE ) Have you done a web search? I have had good luck with lycos searching for technical data like this. Doug To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 15 7:37:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from pau-amma.whistle.com (pau-amma.whistle.com [207.76.205.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64DFC153AD for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 07:30:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dhw@whistle.com) Received: (from dhw@localhost) by pau-amma.whistle.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id HAA84775; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 07:30:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 07:30:13 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <199909151430.HAA84775@pau-amma.whistle.com> To: domi@saargate.de, fbsd-isp@ursine.com Subject: Re: copy of incoming mail to another account Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Date: Tue, 14 Sep 1999 21:39:50 +0200 (CEST) >From: Dominik Brettnacher >> You can use the .forward file to copy as well, allowing delivery to >> both the original addressee as well as the remote address. Do something >> like this: >> ~localuser/.forward: >> \localuser,remote@domain.com >Why is the backslash needed? To tell the MTA to suppress aliasing for the address in question. Normally, each recipient address for which local delivery is done is subject to aliasing. Cheers, david -- David Wolfskill dhw@whistle.com UNIX System Administrator voice: (650) 577-7158 pager: (888) 347-0197 FAX: (650) 372-5915 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 15 10:45:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from tinker.com (troll.tinker.com [204.214.7.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6BF11515F for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 10:45:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from carol@tinker.com) Received: by localhost (8.8.5/8.8.5) Received: by mail.tinker.com via smap (V2.0) id xma018630; Wed Sep 15 12:22:32 1999 Received: by localhost (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA09695; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 12:44:02 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <37DFDB45.2A836021@tinker.com> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 12:45:41 -0500 From: Carol Deihl Organization: Shrier and Deihl X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 2.2.8-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ray Bagby Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: more isp lists References: <00ce01beff59$1f7535e0$152dc126@raybagby> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Ray, Check the ISP Resources section at http://www.internet.com/ There are a number of mailing lists (also reachable through the above link) at http://www.isp-lists.com/ I've learned lots of interesting things on several of those lists, but they tend to be fairly high volume and frequently wander way off-topic or into flame wars... Ray Bagby wrote: > Are there any other lists or groups or organizations for ISP > folks. I have concerns from marketing to website designs of which I would > like other views. -- Carol Deihl - principal, Shrier and Deihl - mailto:carol@tinker.com Remote Unix Network Admin, Security, Internet Software Development Tinker Internet Services - Superior FreeBSD-based Web Hosting http://www.tinker.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 15 10:54:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from bsdie.rwsystems.net (bsdie.rwsystems.net [209.197.223.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213F9152BE for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 10:54:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jwyatt@rwsystems.net) Received: from bsdie.rwsystems.net([209.197.223.2]) (1201 bytes) by bsdie.rwsystems.net via sendmail with P:esmtp/R:bind_hosts/T:inet_zone_bind_smtp (sender: ) id for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 12:48:02 -0500 (CDT) (Smail-3.2.0.106 1999-Mar-31 #1 built 1999-Aug-7) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 12:48:01 -0500 (CDT) From: James Wyatt To: Dominik Brettnacher Cc: "fbsd-isp@ursine.com" , freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: copy of incoming mail to another account In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org So sendmail knows not to recurse on the alias. If it's not there, the MTA (sendmail, smail, etc...) can hit the spin cycle resolving it. Hope this helps - Jy@ On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Dominik Brettnacher wrote: > On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, fbsd-isp@ursine.com wrote: > > You can use the .forward file to copy as well, allowing delivery to > > both the original addressee as well as the remote address. Do something > > like this: > > > > ~localuser/.forward: > > > > \localuser,remote@domain.com > > Why is the backslash needed? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 15 14: 7: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from bekool.com (ns2.netquick.net [216.48.34.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663BB15272; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 14:06:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trouble@hackfurby.com) Received: from bastille.netquick.net ([216.48.32.159] helo=hackfurby.com) by bekool.com with esmtp (Exim 3.03 #1) id 11RMeH-000HOA-00; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 21:31:29 +0000 Message-ID: <37E16A99.294319D9@hackfurby.com> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 17:09:30 -0500 From: TrouBle Reply-To: trouble@hackfurby.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-19990816-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , FreeBSD-ISP List , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Nmap scanning Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org regarding nmap scanning..... found on another list, is this an issue for FreeBSD ??? > Yeah, don't know how useful it is, since the only current version of an OS > that it seems to be effective against is Digital Unix. With only the ACK > bit set it might be able to get through some firewall rules, though. I think it works against the latest FreeBSD as well. Perhaps I should apply your patch and leave it as another undocumented scan type in the next version of Nmap. Interestingly, the nmap-os-fingerprints database that comes with Nmap can often enumerate the operating systems with interesting characteristics like this. For example, here is an easy way to get a list of OS versions that should be vulnerable to your window scan: amy~/nmap>cat nmap-os-fingerprints | perl -ne 'while(<>) { chomp;if (/^fingerprint\s+([^\#]+)/i) { if (defined($owin) and defined($cwin) and $owin ne $cwin) { print "$oname ($owin vs. $cwin)\n";} $oname=$1;undef($cwin);undef($owin);} elsif (/^T(4|6)\(.*W=([^%]+)/) { if ($1 eq 4){$owin=$2;} else { $cwin = $2; }}}' | sort -f A/UX 3.1.1 SVR2 (1000 vs. 0) ACC Amazon 9.2.29 or Congo 9.2.35 WAN concentrator (1000 vs. 0) Acorn Risc OS 3.6 (Acorn TCP/IP Stack 4.07) (3000 vs. 0) Acorn RiscOS 3.7 using AcornNet TCP/IP stack (4000 vs. 0) AGE Logic, Inc. IBM XStation (2000 vs. 0) AIX 3.2 (4000 vs. 0) AIX 4.0 - 4.1 (8000|4000 vs. 0) AIX 4.02.0001.0000 (4000 vs. 0) AIX 4.1 (4000 vs. 0) AIX 4.2 (4000 vs. 0) AIX 4.2 (4000 vs. 0) AIX 4.3.2 (4000 vs. 0) AIX v4.1 running on a C10 (4000 vs. 0) Alcatel 1000 DSL Router / unknown OS Rev. (2000 vs. 0) AmigaOS AmiTCP/IP 4.3 (2000 vs. 0) AmigaOS AmiTCP/IP Genesis 4.6 (8000 vs. 0) AmigaOS Miami 2.1-3.0 (4000 vs. 0) AmigaOS Miami 3.0 (4000 vs. 0) AmigaOS Miami 3.1-3.2 (4000 vs. 0) AmigaOS Miami Deluxe 0.9 - Miami 3.2B (4000 vs. 0) AOS/VS or VSII (1000 vs. 0) Apollo Domain/OS SR10.4 (239C vs. 800) Auspex Fileserver (AuspexOS 1.9.1/SunOS 4.1.4) (4000 vs. 0) AXIS NetEye Camera Server V1.20 (100|0 vs. 0) AXIS or Meridian Data Network CD-ROM server (200 vs. 0) AXIS Stack -- CD-ROM Server or Printer Server or Camera Server (100|0 vs. 0) BeOS 4 - 4.5 (3000 vs. 0) BSDI BSD/OS 2.0 - 2.1 (2000|0 vs. 0) CacheOS (CacheFlow 2000 proxy cache) (2000 vs. 0) Canon photocopier/fax/scanner/printer GP30F (C00 vs. 0) Cisco CacheEngine (2000 vs. 0) Compaq Tru64 UNIX (formerly Digital UNIX) 4.0e (8000 vs. 0) Convex OS Release 10.1 (7C00 vs. 0) Cray Unicos 9.0 - 10.0 or Unicos/mk 1.5.1 (FFFF vs. 0) Cray UNICOS 9.0.1ai - 10.0.0.2 (8000 vs. 0) DEC OSF/1 V1.3A (8000 vs. 0) DECNIS 600 V4.1.3B System (8000 vs. 0) DECserver700-16, Network Access SW V2.2 (600 vs. 0) DG/UX Release R4.11MU02 (2238 vs. 0) Digital OpenVMS AXP 6.2 running Attachmate Pathway 3.1 TCP stack (2000 vs. 0) Digital Unix 4.0E (7000|8000 vs. 0) Digital UNIX OSF1 V 3.0,3.2,3.2C (8000 vs. 0) Digital UNIX OSF1 V 4.0,4.0B,4.0D (8000 vs. 0) Extreme Gigabit switch (unknown version) (1000 vs. 0) FreeBSD 2.1.0 - 2.1.5 (4000 vs. 0) FreeBSD 2.2.1 - 3.2 (4000|0 vs. 0) FreeBSD 2.2.1 - 4.0 (4000|0 vs. 0) HP Entria X station (running Netstation 7.x) (2000 vs. 0) HP-BSD 2.0 (2000 vs. 0) HP-UX 9.01 - 9.07 (2000 vs. 0) HP-UX A.09.00 E 9000/817 - A.09.07 A 9000/777 (2000 vs. 0) HP-UX B.10.01 A 9000/715 (8000 vs. 0) HP-UX B.10.20 A 9000/715 or 9000/712 or 9000/871 or 9000/861 with tcp_random_seq = 0 (8000 vs. 0) HP-UX B.10.20 A 9000/715 or 9000/712 or 9000/871 with tcp_random_seq = 1 (8000 vs. 0) IBM LAN RouteSwitch/Xylan OmniSwitch Version 3.2.5/NeXT (1000 vs. 0) IBM OS/2 V 2.1 (7000 vs. 0) IBM OS/2 V.3 (7000 vs. 0) IBM OS/2 Warp 4.0 (7000 vs. 0) IBM OS/2 Warp Server for E-business (Aurora) Beta (8000 vs. 0) IBM OS/2 Warp Server for E-business (Aurora) Beta (8000 vs. 0) Intel NetportExpress(tm) 10/100 3-port ROM: V05.10a (16D0 vs. 0) IRIX 5.2 (F000 vs. 0) IRIX 5.3 (EF2A|F000 vs. 0) Juniper Router running JUNOS (4000 vs. 0) LynxOS Realtime OS -- Could be MeetingPlace 3.4, Xylogics Remote Annex 4000 terminal server (1000 vs. 0) Mac OS X (Rhapsody 5.5) on a G3 (8000 vs. 0) Meridian Data Network CD-ROM Server (V4.20 Nov 26 1997) (200 vs. 0) Mirapoint M1000 (OS v 1.0.0) (4000 vs. 0) NCD X server (SNMP says: NCD16 server 2.3.0 03/12/91 downloaded) (800 vs. 0) Neoware (was HDS) NetOS V. 2.0.1 or HP ENTRIA C3230A (2000 vs. 0) NetApp OnTap 3.1.6 (1000 vs. 0) NetApp OnTap 5.1.2 - 5.2.2 (2000 vs. 0) NetBSD 1.0 big endian arch (4000 vs. 0) NetBSD 1.0 little endian arch (4000 vs. 0) NetBSD 1.1 - 1.2.1 litle endian arch (4000 vs. 0) NetBSD 1.2 - 1.2.1 big endian arch (4000 vs. 0) Network Systems router NS6614 (NSC 6600 series) (1000 vs. 0) NeXT Mach (1000 vs. 0) OpenBSD 2.1 - 2.3/SPARC (4000 vs. 0) OpenBSD 2.1/X86 (4000 vs. 0) OpenBSD 2.2 - 2.3 (4000 vs. 0) OpenBSD Post 2.4 (November 1998) - 2.5 (4000 vs. 0) OpenStep 4.0 or NextStep 1.0 (Intel) (1000 vs. 0) OpenStep 4.1/NeXTStep 3.3 (1000 vs. 0) OpenStep 4.2/Intel (1000 vs. 0) OpenVMS 6.1 (1000 vs. 0) OpenVMS 6.2 (1800 vs. 0) OpenVMS 7.1 Alpha running Digital's UCX v4.1ECO2 TCP/IP package (BB8 vs. 0) OpenVMS Alpha 6.2 running DIGITAL TCP/IP Services (UCX) v4.0 (BB8 vs. 0) OpenVMS Alpha V7.1-1H2 running DIGITAL TCP/IP Services (UCX) V4.2 (1000 vs. 0) OpenVMS V6.1 on Digital VAX 4000-105A (1800 vs. 0) OSF/1 5.60 (8000 vs. 0) Packeteer IP-PacketShaper 2000 V3.1 (1000 vs. 0) QNX 4.24 (2000 vs. 0) Redback SMS1000 Router (2000 vs. 0) Rhapsody 5.3 - 5.4 (Mac OS X Server 1.0 - 1.0-1) (2000 vs. 0) Router/Switch (LanPlex 2500/Cisco Catalyst 5505/Trancell Webramp/Xylan Omni Switch) (1000 vs. 0) SEQUENT DYNIX/ptx(R) V4.2.1 (1000 vs. 0) Shiva LanRover/8E Version 3.5 (1000 vs. 0) Snap Network Box (4470 vs. 0) SPP-UX 5.2.1 (8000 vs. <1001) SPP-UX 5.x on a Convex SPP-1600 (8000 vs. C00) Stock OpenVMS 7.1 (2200 vs. 0) SunOS 4.0.3 (1000 vs. 0) SunOS 4.1.1 - 4.1.4 (or derivative) (1000|2000|6000|C000 vs. 0) SunOS 4.1.3_U1 + ISI RFC1323 mods from ISI (1000 vs. 0) Ultrix 4.1 (4000 vs. 0) Ultrix 4.2 - 4.5 (4000 vs. 0) Unicos 10.0.0 on Cray 90 (8000 vs. 0) VAX 7000-610 or 4200/SPX OR 6000-430 (1800 vs. 0) VAX/VMS 5.3 on a MicroVAX II (1000 vs. 0) VNS V6.2 (2200 vs. 0) VxWorks 5.3.x bases system (usually an ethernet hub or switch) (1000 vs. 0) webcache CacheFlow 5000 with latest OS (2000 vs. 0) Xylan OmniSwitch 5x/9x ethernet switch, Annex3 Comm server R10.0, or Hitach HI-UX/WE2 (1000 vs. 0) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 15 18: 0: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from drip.puddle.net (cx288885-b.okcs1.ok.home.com [24.4.98.148]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E821515F for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 17:59:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from river@theriver.nu) Received: by cx288885-b.okcs1.ok.home.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) id ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 20:04:34 -0500 Message-ID: <21DC5E98AE1FD311B1290020AFDB6C6E63D8@cx288885-b.okcs1.ok.home.com> From: river To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: RE: SMTP load balancing Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 20:04:28 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Why not setup the MX record to point at mail.yourhost.com and then have mail with the 4 machines ip's in round robin style (4 A Records if I remebmer correctly). These 4 machines can deliver mail to = the pop3 server on the backend that all your users connect to. Yes all the users will still connect to the same machine for pop3, but the sending = and recieving of mail is processed by the 4 BSD machines. -----Original Message----- From: Fernando Schapachnik [mailto:fpscha@ns1.sminter.com.ar] Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 8:38 AM To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: SMTP load balancing Hello: I've a situation on which I need some help. We're running a busy=20 mail server, now on a Sun. As vertical scalability is very expensive = I'm=20 considering building an -individually inexpensive- FreeBSD cluster. What I'm certain about is that I don't what to use NFS, because of all the problem it generates (locking, etc.).=20 I thought about building something like: +-----------+ +----- Server 1 | Front end | | | DNS MX |--------+----- Server 2 +-----------+ | +----- Server ... | +----- Server n The idea is that there is one machine pointed by the MX record=20 that receives incoming mail and distributes it between the other = servers.=20 Some problems arise: a) The front end still has to manage the huge amount of incoming mail. b) Uniform POP3 access to mailboxes under the same name becomes = imposible. Another posibility would be to have something like +-------------+ +-------------+ +---------------+ +-------------+ | Front end 1 | | Front end 2 | | Front end ... | | Front end n | +-------------+ +-------------+ +---------------+ +-------------+ | | | | +---------------+---------+---------+-----------------+ | +------------+ | Disk array | +------------+ But... such a thing exists? I mean: an external disk array that=20 can be mounted by several FreeBSD machines at the same time. I think = not.=20 May be replacing the disk array by another machine, which has the file=20 repository and is the POP3 server? I would really aprettiate any comment or suggestion. Thanks for your time! Fernando P. Schapachnik Administraci=F3n de la red VIA Net Works Argentina SA Diagonal Roque S=E1enz Pe=F1a 971, 4=BA y 5=BA piso. 1035 - Capital Federal, Argentina.=20 (54-11) 4323-3333 http://www.via-net-works.net.ar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 15 18:16:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from monet.etfal.g12.br (monet.etfal.g12.br [200.241.165.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054BB14BEC; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 18:16:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from aald@monet.etfal.g12.br) Received: from localhost (aald@localhost) by monet.etfal.g12.br (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id WAA29691; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 22:25:43 -0300 (EST) Date: Wed, 15 Sep 1999 22:25:43 -0300 (EST) From: Aldenor Falcao To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Compile Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi guys, I'd like to compile the cyrus imap with kerberos support, but: apd.conf\" -O -pipe login_krb_pwcheck.c In file included from login_krb_pwcheck.c:43: /usr/include/netinet/in.h:224: parse error before `u_int32_t' /usr/include/netinet/in.h:224: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union /usr/include/netinet/in.h:276: parse error before `u_char' /usr/include/netinet/in.h:276: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union /usr/include/netinet/in.h:277: warning: data definition has no type or storage class /usr/include/netinet/in.h:278: parse error before `sin_port' /usr/include/netinet/in.h:278: warning: data definition has no type or storage class /usr/include/netinet/in.h:281: parse error before `}' /usr/include/netinet/in.h:291: field `ip_dst' has incomplete type /usr/include/netinet/in.h:343: field `imr_multiaddr' has incomplete type /usr/include/netinet/in.h:344: field `imr_interface' has incomplete type login_krb_pwcheck.c: In function `login_plaintext': login_krb_pwcheck.c:111: `errno' undeclared (first use this function) login_krb_pwcheck.c:111: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once login_krb_pwcheck.c:111: for each function it appears in.) login_krb_pwcheck.c: In function `login_authproc': login_krb_pwcheck.c:241: warning: passing arg 4 of `kname_parse' discards `const' from pointer target type login_krb_pwcheck.c:245: warning: passing arg 4 of `kname_parse' discards `const' from pointer target type /usr/include/netinet/in.h: At top level: /usr/include/netinet/in.h:279: storage size of `sin_addr' isn't known *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 cyrus is version 1.5.19 and FreeBSD 3.2 Any glue? TIA, Aldenor ----------------------------------------------------- Aldenor Falcao Martins, M Sc ----------------------------------------------------- Protect privacy, boycott Intel: http://www.bigbrotherinside.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 15 23: 7: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (wya-oe15.hotmail.com [207.82.253.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1560158F2 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 22:54:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hmoghadam@hotmail.com) Received: (qmail 61748 invoked by uid 65534); 16 Sep 1999 05:54:05 -0000 Message-ID: <19990916055405.61747.qmail@hotmail.com> X-Originating-IP: [195.200.226.107] From: "Hamid Moghadam" To: References: <19990915062122.87946.qmail@hotmail.com> <37DFAEB6.52B009D0@gorean.org> Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC, V.35 cross ... Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:23:30 +0430 Organization: Iran OnLine MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dear friends Thanks for your all helps. I found the documentation and solved my problem. Big thanks. Cheers - Hamid To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Sep 15 23:28:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from drip.puddle.net (cx288885-b.okcs1.ok.home.com [24.4.98.148]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EFE114BE4 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 1999 23:28:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from river@theriver.nu) Received: by cx288885-b.okcs1.ok.home.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) id ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 01:33:13 -0500 Message-ID: <21DC5E98AE1FD311B1290020AFDB6C6E63DC@cx288885-b.okcs1.ok.home.com> From: river To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: SMTP load balancing Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 01:33:12 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I.E.: MX record mail.yourdomain.com priority 10 MX record pop.yourdomain.com priority 20 A record mail X.X.X.15 <- server 1 A record mail X.X.X.16 <- server 2 A record mail X.X.X.17 <- server 3 A record mail X.X.X.18 <- server 4 A record pop X.X.X.19 <- pop server its the same process for www round robin....whenever a client dns's mail.yourdomain.com they get the 1st server, the next person that dns's mail.yourdomain.com gets the 2nd server....etc they key here is to have each one of these servers forward mail to the pop3 server. and in turn, the pop3 server forwards outgoing mail to "mail" and then each one gets round robin on outgoing mail also. NOTE: the pop3 server will still have to be a nice machine....but the 4 "forwarding" machines can be mid range...because each one will be processing 1/4 of the mail. NOTE: round robin is handled automatically by the DNS server -----Original Message----- From: Shawn Workman [mailto:sworkman@iea-software.com] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 1999 1:19 AM To: river; freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMTP load balancing I would love to have more info on this as well.. If I have one MX record for my mail server and 4 A records would the A records (with different IP's) point to the same machine name? Is the round-robin automatic at this point? If you could point me to some documentation on this I would appreciate it. Thanks in advance.. ----- Original Message ----- From: river To: Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 6:04 PM Subject: RE: SMTP load balancing > Why not setup the MX record to point at mail.yourhost.com > > and then have mail with the 4 machines ip's in round robin style (4 A > Records if I remebmer correctly). These 4 machines can deliver mail to the > pop3 server on the backend that all your users connect to. Yes all the > users will still connect to the same machine for pop3, but the sending and > recieving of mail is processed by the 4 BSD machines. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Fernando Schapachnik [mailto:fpscha@ns1.sminter.com.ar] > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 1999 8:38 AM > To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org > Subject: SMTP load balancing > > > Hello: > I've a situation on which I need some help. We're running a busy > mail server, now on a Sun. As vertical scalability is very expensive I'm > considering building an -individually inexpensive- FreeBSD cluster. > > What I'm certain about is that I don't what to use NFS, because of > all the problem it generates (locking, etc.). > > I thought about building something like: > > > +-----------+ +----- Server 1 > | Front end | | > | DNS MX |--------+----- Server 2 > +-----------+ | > +----- Server ... > | > +----- Server n > > The idea is that there is one machine pointed by the MX record > that receives incoming mail and distributes it between the other servers. > Some problems arise: > > a) The front end still has to manage the huge amount of incoming mail. > > b) Uniform POP3 access to mailboxes under the same name becomes imposible. > > Another posibility would be to have something like > > +-------------+ +-------------+ +---------------+ +-------------+ > | Front end 1 | | Front end 2 | | Front end ... | | Front end n | > +-------------+ +-------------+ +---------------+ +-------------+ > | | | | > +---------------+---------+---------+-----------------+ > | > +------------+ > | Disk array | > +------------+ > > But... such a thing exists? I mean: an external disk array that > can be mounted by several FreeBSD machines at the same time. I think not. > May be replacing the disk array by another machine, which has the file > repository and is the POP3 server? > > I would really aprettiate any comment or suggestion. > > Thanks for your time! > > > Fernando P. Schapachnik > Administración de la red > VIA Net Works Argentina SA > Diagonal Roque Sáenz Peña 971, 4º y 5º piso. > 1035 - Capital Federal, Argentina. > (54-11) 4323-3333 > http://www.via-net-works.net.ar > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 6: 8:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.palnet.com (mail.palnet.com [212.29.201.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C307150BC for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 06:08:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rjebara@palnet.com) Received: from localhost (rjebara@localhost) by mail.palnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA19282; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 16:07:54 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 16:07:54 +0300 (IDT) From: Rami Abu Jebara To: Hamid Moghadam Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC, V.35 cross ... In-Reply-To: <19990915062122.87946.qmail@hotmail.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi If this is for a cisco serial interface (crossing 2 ciscos) you can use a Cisco DTE + Cisco DCE cable . set the close rate on the interface .. and that's it. else .. check the equipment manual. cheers Rami **************************** Rami Abu Jebara Technical Director Palnet Communications Ltd e-mail : rjebara@palnet.com Tel: ++ 972 2 583 5666 Fax: ++ 972 2 583 6354 w w w . p a l n e t . c o m On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Hamid Moghadam wrote: > Dear guys > > Sorry for being very off topic but I nead the information urgently. > Where can I find the pin assignment for V.35 cross connection ? > V.35 ( DCE ) <=> V.35 ( DCE ) > > > Thanks for every thing. > > - Hamid > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 6:20:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from florence.pavilion.net (florence.pavilion.net [194.242.128.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0666215415 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 06:20:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from joe@florence.pavilion.net) Received: (from joe@localhost) by florence.pavilion.net (8.9.3/8.8.8) id OAA34678; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 14:19:36 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from joe) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 14:19:36 +0100 From: Josef Karthauser To: Rami Abu Jebara Cc: Hamid Moghadam , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: OFF TOPIC, V.35 cross ... Message-ID: <19990916141936.C96542@florence.pavilion.net> References: <19990915062122.87946.qmail@hotmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: X-NCC-RegID: uk.pavilion Organisation: Pavilion Internet plc, 24 The Old Steine, Brighton, BN1 1EL, England Phone: +44-845-333-5000 Fax: +44-845-333-5001 Mobile: +44-403-596893 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 04:07:54PM +0300, Rami Abu Jebara wrote: > Hi > > If this is for a cisco serial interface (crossing 2 ciscos) > > you can use a Cisco DTE + Cisco DCE cable . > > set the close rate on the interface .. and that's it. > > else .. check the equipment manual. > > cheers > > Rami Set the clock speed on the Cisco with the DCE cable plugged into it: interface serial X clock ? (not all the speeds are supported) Joe -- Josef Karthauser FreeBSD: How many times have you booted today? Technical Manager Viagra for your server (http://www.uk.freebsd.org) Pavilion Internet plc. [joe@pavilion.net, joe@uk.freebsd.org, joe@tao.org.uk] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 6:48:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70634152ED for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 06:48:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shovey@buffnet.net) Received: from buffnet11.buffnet.net (buffnet11.buffnet.net [205.246.19.55]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA25524 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 09:48:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from shovey@buffnet.net) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 09:48:08 -0400 (EDT) From: Steve Hovey To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: sendmail question Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org is there a way with the newer sendmail's to set up a hashing for user inbox? like instead of /var/spool/mail/shovey - have it go to /usr/mail/s/h/shovey ? Thanx To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 7:32: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from pau-amma.whistle.com (pau-amma.whistle.com [207.76.205.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8F814E70 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 07:32:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dhw@whistle.com) Received: (from dhw@localhost) by pau-amma.whistle.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id HAA02230; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 07:32:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 07:32:06 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <199909161432.HAA02230@pau-amma.whistle.com> To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, shovey@buffnet.net Subject: Re: sendmail question In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 09:48:08 -0400 (EDT) >From: Steve Hovey >is there a way with the newer sendmail's to set up a hashing for user >inbox? like instead of /var/spool/mail/shovey - have it go to >/usr/mail/s/h/shovey ? Since sendmail (proper) doesn't do local mail delivery, that would seem to be an issue with your local mail delivery agent. In FreeBSD systems, that's generally /usr/libexec/mail.local. There's no reason you couldn't substitute your own local mail delivery agent that does whatever you want, subject to the constraints inposed by the context. Cheers, david -- David Wolfskill dhw@whistle.com UNIX System Administrator voice: (650) 577-7158 pager: (888) 347-0197 FAX: (650) 372-5915 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 8: 1:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from seidata.com (seidata.com [208.10.211.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67DCF15222 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 08:01:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pboehmer@seidata.com) Received: from yaffer (lan-gw.seidata.com [208.10.211.26]) by seidata.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA24527 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 11:01:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19990916110223.007953b0@seidata.com> X-Sender: pboehmer@seidata.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 11:02:23 -0400 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: Paul Boehmer Subject: Unrelated SendMail Question Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The ISP I work for had a request from an end-user to relay mail to his *dial-up* exchange server. Right now we just alias a couple of their accounts. Any ideas on how to accomplish this? We are on the current build of Sendmail and Freebsd-3.2 Stable. Any help appreciated. Thanks in advance Paul Boehmer pboehmer@seidata.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 8:31:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from www.SLipmat.net (slipmat.net [216.4.88.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9C615464 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 08:31:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian.scott@soulphusionrecords.com) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by www.SLipmat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA37312; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:31:01 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from brian.scott@soulphusionrecords.com) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:31:01 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199909161531.KAA37312@www.SLipmat.net> X-Authentication-Warning: www.SLipmat.net: nobody set sender to brian.scott@soulphusionrecords.com using -f From: Brian Scott To: mailing list Reply-To: Brian Scott MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP3 Imap webMail Program 2.0.10 Subject: dig @a.root-servers.net.. status: NXDOMAIN ?? Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm having a problem with one domain in particular, I'm confident that my nameserver is set up correctly, however nothing will propigate outside of my network. The only difference that I notice is when I use `dig` on a root server... [root@noc:~]# dig @a.root-servers.net ANY sgba.com ; <<>> DiG 8.1 <<>> @a.root-servers.net ANY sgba.com ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 10 on the above line where is says "status: NXDOMAIN" it should read "status: NOERROR" can anyone tell my what this is and how I can resolve it? Any help would be greatly appreciated! thanks .o0 Brian McGowan 0o. Chief Network Administrator Worldnet Communications Inc. -=Powered by FreeBSD=- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 8:34:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from seidata.com (seidata.com [208.10.211.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A01153FA for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 08:34:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pboehmer@seidata.com) Received: from yaffer (lan-gw.seidata.com [208.10.211.26]) by seidata.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA04042 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 11:34:35 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19990916113515.00799bd0@seidata.com> X-Sender: pboehmer@seidata.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 11:35:15 -0400 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: Paul Boehmer Subject: Unrelated Sendmail Question Part II Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I apologize for the lack of description, let me clarify... The client wants to use his Microsoft Exchange server to get his company-wide mail from our ISP using a dail-up account (non 24/7). We currently host a virtual-domain for the client and have a couple of mail aliases setup. How do you setup mail-relaying without have a 24/7 connection to pass the request to? >The ISP I work for had a request from an end-user to relay mail to his >*dial-up* exchange server. Right now we just alias a couple of their >accounts. Any ideas on how to accomplish this? We are on the current >build of Sendmail and Freebsd-3.2 Stable. Any help appreciated. Thanks in advance Paul Boehmer pboehmer@seidata.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 8:38: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from heaven.gigo.com (heaven.gigo.com [209.0.55.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3B5C15776 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 08:38:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jfesler@gigo.com) Received: from heaven.gigo.com (heaven.gigo.com [209.0.55.69]) by heaven.gigo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6E0988C; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 08:37:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 08:37:15 -0700 (PDT) From: To: Brian Scott Cc: mailing list Subject: Re: dig @a.root-servers.net.. status: NXDOMAIN ?? In-Reply-To: <199909161531.KAA37312@www.SLipmat.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I'm having a problem with one domain in particular, I'm > confident that my nameserver is set up correctly, Pay your bill? According to Internic invoice number 7731626, they want $35 from you. They don't mention what the due date on that was. I'm guessing July though, based on the anniversary of your domain creation. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 8:39:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from seidata.com (seidata.com [208.10.211.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8B1156D4 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 08:39:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pboehmer@seidata.com) Received: from yaffer (lan-gw.seidata.com [208.10.211.26]) by seidata.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA05533 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 11:39:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19990916114012.00796ca0@seidata.com> X-Sender: pboehmer@seidata.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 11:40:12 -0400 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: Paul Boehmer Subject: Re: Unrelated SendMail Question In-Reply-To: <19990916153023.286D668A01@mail.nfol.com> References: <3.0.6.32.19990916110223.007953b0@seidata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org That sounds like the way to go, easy and clean. Thanks for your help. At 11:30 AM 9/16/99 -0400, you wrote: >Hello, > >Is this a separate domain name from your own? If so, IMHO the easiest way >to do this is to assign them a static IP address, and use sendmail's >mailertable to forward all their mail to it. When the customer dials in, >they can set their server to send the "ETRN" command to trigger your >server to start sending their mail. Basically, you're server will just >queue the incoming mail until they dial-up. > >There are other tricks you can play to still keep some accounts local >while sending the rest to the dial-up server. I won't go into detail >with that because I do not know exactly what you are trying to do. > >Dan Harnett > >> >> The ISP I work for had a request from an end-user to relay mail to his >> *dial-up* exchange server. Right now we just alias a couple of their >> accounts. Any ideas on how to accomplish this? We are on the current >> build of Sendmail and Freebsd-3.2 Stable. >> >> Any help appreciated. >> Thanks in advance >> >> Paul Boehmer >> pboehmer@seidata.com >> >> >> >> >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message >> > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 8:42:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from heaven.gigo.com (heaven.gigo.com [209.0.55.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B5C14DF1 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 08:42:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jfesler@gigo.com) Received: from heaven.gigo.com (heaven.gigo.com [209.0.55.69]) by heaven.gigo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB0086A; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 08:41:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 08:41:45 -0700 (PDT) From: To: Paul Boehmer Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unrelated Sendmail Question Part II In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.19990916113515.00799bd0@seidata.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > The client wants to use his Microsoft Exchange server to get his > company-wide mail from our ISP using a dail-up account (non 24/7). We See http://www.swinc.com/resources/exch_dq.htm While I knew what I was looking for, I found it with the yahoo search of "sendmail exchange" as the 2nd link. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 8:44:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from richard2.pil.net (richard2.pil.net [207.8.164.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D932156D4 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 08:44:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from up@pil.net) Received: (qmail 25249 invoked by uid 1825); 16 Sep 1999 15:44:23 -0000 Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 11:44:22 -0400 (EDT) From: X-Sender: up@richard2.pil.net To: Paul Boehmer Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unrelated Sendmail Question Part II In-Reply-To: <3.0.6.32.19990916113515.00799bd0@seidata.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ETRN...both Sendmail and M$ Exchange support it... On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Paul Boehmer wrote: > I apologize for the lack of description, let me clarify... > > The client wants to use his Microsoft Exchange server to get his > company-wide mail from our ISP using a dail-up account (non 24/7). We > currently host a virtual-domain for the client and have a couple of mail > aliases setup. How do you setup mail-relaying without have a 24/7 > connection to pass the request to? > > >The ISP I work for had a request from an end-user to relay mail to his > >*dial-up* exchange server. Right now we just alias a couple of their > >accounts. Any ideas on how to accomplish this? We are on the current > >build of Sendmail and Freebsd-3.2 Stable. > > Any help appreciated. > Thanks in advance > > Paul Boehmer > pboehmer@seidata.com > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > James Smallacombe PlantageNet, Inc. CEO and Janitor up@3.am http://3.am ========================================================================= ISPF 3 - The Forum for ISPs by ISPs(tm) || Nov 15-17, 1999, New Orleans 3 days of clues, news, and views from the industry's best and brightest. Visit for information and registration. ========================================================================= To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 9:43:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ns.mt.sri.com (ns.mt.sri.com [206.127.79.91]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E5B1535F for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 09:43:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@mt.sri.com) Received: from mt.sri.com (rocky.mt.sri.com [206.127.76.100]) by ns.mt.sri.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA08602; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:43:45 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from nate@rocky.mt.sri.com) Received: by mt.sri.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id KAA08662; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:43:44 -0600 Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:43:44 -0600 Message-Id: <199909161643.KAA08662@mt.sri.com> From: Nate Williams MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Brian Scott Cc: mailing list Subject: Re: dig @a.root-servers.net.. status: NXDOMAIN ?? In-Reply-To: <199909161531.KAA37312@www.SLipmat.net> References: <199909161531.KAA37312@www.SLipmat.net> X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 19.16 "Lille" XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I'm having a problem with one domain in particular, I'm > confident that my nameserver is set up correctly, Pay your network solutions bill perhaps, since it's probably not been paid.... ? Nate > however nothing will propigate outside of my network. > The only difference that I notice is when I use `dig` on > a root server... > [root@noc:~]# dig @a.root-servers.net ANY sgba.com > > ; <<>> DiG 8.1 <<>> @a.root-servers.net ANY sgba.com > ; (1 server found) > ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch > ;; got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 10 > > on the above line where is says "status: NXDOMAIN" it > should read "status: NOERROR" > > can anyone tell my what this is and how I can resolve > it? > Any help would be greatly appreciated! > > thanks > > .o0 Brian McGowan 0o. > > Chief Network Administrator > Worldnet Communications Inc. > -=Powered by FreeBSD=- > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 9:50:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from www.SLipmat.net (slipmat.net [216.4.88.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE5B153CA for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 09:50:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian.scott@soulphusionrecords.com) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by www.SLipmat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA37748; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 11:50:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from brian.scott@soulphusionrecords.com) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 11:50:19 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199909161650.LAA37748@www.SLipmat.net> X-Authentication-Warning: www.SLipmat.net: nobody set sender to brian.scott@soulphusionrecords.com using -f From: Brian Scott To: Nate Williams Reply-To: Brian Scott Cc: mailing list References: <199909161531.KAA37312@www.SLipmat.net> <199909161643.KAA08662@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199909161643.KAA08662@mt.sri.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP3 Imap webMail Program 2.0.10 Subject: Re: dig @a.root-servers.net.. status: NXDOMAIN ?? Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'd always relied on seeing "Status: HOLD" in the whois of a domain if it was disabled due to payment, however they're not doing that anymore =( Thanks! Brian Quoting Nate Williams : > > I'm having a problem with one domain in particular, I'm > > confident that my nameserver is set up correctly, > > Pay your network solutions bill perhaps, since it's probably not been > paid.... ? > > > Nate > > > however nothing will propigate outside of my network. > > The only difference that I notice is when I use `dig` on > > a root server... > > [root@noc:~]# dig @a.root-servers.net ANY sgba.com > > > > ; <<>> DiG 8.1 <<>> @a.root-servers.net ANY sgba.com > > ; (1 server found) > > ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch > > ;; got answer: > > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 10 > > > > on the above line where is says "status: NXDOMAIN" it > > should read "status: NOERROR" > > > > can anyone tell my what this is and how I can resolve > > it? > > Any help would be greatly appreciated! > > > > thanks > > > > .o0 Brian McGowan 0o. > > > > Chief Network Administrator > > Worldnet Communications Inc. > > -=Powered by FreeBSD=- > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > .o0 Brian McGowan 0o. Chief Network Administrator Worldnet Communications Inc. -=Powered by FreeBSD=- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 9:59:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from proxima.axl.net (proxima.axl.net [216.66.11.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CB4C15460 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 09:59:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from matt@axl.net) Received: (qmail 77876 invoked from network); 16 Sep 1999 16:57:46 -0000 Received: from cv39849-a.stmfd1.ct.home.com (HELO sinister) (24.228.19.132) by smtp-east-1.axl.net with SMTP; 16 Sep 1999 16:57:46 -0000 Reply-To: From: "Matthew B. Henniges" To: Subject: RE: SMTP load balancing Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 13:01:03 -0400 Message-ID: <000a01bf0065$0feab480$e600000a@darkmaze.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <199909151338.KAA15642@ns1.sminter.com.ar> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > b) Uniform POP3 access to mailboxes under the same name > becomes impossible. > If the mail accounts were split across the servers in some sort of ordered way, you could always write a _very_ small proxy for the front end that did something similar to this: 1. If account name begins with a-f redirect to server 1, g-m to server 2 2. reissue the USER command to the appropriate server, and then pass the response back to the client. from this point forward, the proxy just forward things between the client and the server. Matthew B. Henniges Axl.net Communications http://www.axl.net (203) 552-1714 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 10:35:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from proteus.eclipse.net.uk (proteus.eclipse.net.uk [195.188.32.118]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1682114F6F for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:35:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stuart@eclipse.net.uk) Received: from eclipse.net.uk (elara.eclipse.net.uk [195.188.32.31]) by proteus.eclipse.net.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53A729B18; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 18:34:57 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <37E12AF1.23354261@eclipse.net.uk> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 18:37:53 +0100 From: Stuart Henderson Organization: Eclipse Networking Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fernando Schapachnik Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMTP load balancing References: <199909151338.KAA15642@ns1.sminter.com.ar> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > a) The front end still has to manage the huge amount of incoming mail. With something like ldap or SQL (or hash the username to work out which box should store the mail) you can have X number of frontends with identical configuration delivering to the backend boxes. If it's ldap then replication of database servers is reasonably simple too. > b) Uniform POP3 access to mailboxes under the same name becomes imposible. Modify Perdtion as per requirements. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 10:44: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from proteus.eclipse.net.uk (proteus.eclipse.net.uk [195.188.32.118]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E8614DA3 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 10:44:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stuart@eclipse.net.uk) Received: from eclipse.net.uk (elara.eclipse.net.uk [195.188.32.31]) by proteus.eclipse.net.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C389B1B; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 18:44:03 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <37E12D14.993D4FB2@eclipse.net.uk> Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 18:47:00 +0100 From: Stuart Henderson Organization: Eclipse Networking Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en-GB MIME-Version: 1.0 To: up@3.am Cc: Paul Boehmer , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Unrelated Sendmail Question Part II References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > ETRN...both Sendmail and M$ Exchange support it... Well, the latter only supports it if the dialup is directly on the same box and not via a router or other PC. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 14:41:47 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from dt014nb6.san.rr.com (dt014nb6.san.rr.com [24.30.129.182]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C18C014C1E for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 14:41:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by dt014nb6.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA26932; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 15:17:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 15:17:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug X-Sender: doug@dt014nb6.san.rr.com To: Brian Scott Cc: mailing list Subject: Re: dig @a.root-servers.net.. status: NXDOMAIN ?? In-Reply-To: <199909161531.KAA37312@www.SLipmat.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 16 Sep 1999, Brian Scott wrote: > [root@noc:~]# dig @a.root-servers.net ANY sgba.com > > ; <<>> DiG 8.1 <<>> @a.root-servers.net ANY sgba.com > ; (1 server found) > ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch > ;; got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NXDOMAIN, id: 10 > > on the above line where is says "status: NXDOMAIN" it > should read "status: NOERROR" Why do you think it should say that? NXDOMAIN can be translated roughly as, "You asked me for a record in a zone you think I should be authoritative for, but I'm not, and I can't find anyone who is for you to ask instead." NOERROR means, "You asked me for a record in a zone you think I should be authoritative for, and I am authoritative for it, but the record you want doesn't exist." So, clearly NXDOMAIN is the right answer, since there are no records for your domain there. It might also help you to know that the only worthwhile query for a root/TLD nameserver is NS, since those are the only records it's going to have about delegated domains. I will spare you yet another, "So pay your bill already" message since it seems you have. :) Good luck, Doug -- "My mama told me, my mama said, 'don't cry.' She said, 'you're too young a man to have as many women you got.' I looked at my mother dear and didn't even crack a smile. I said, 'If women kill me, I don't mind dyin!'" - John Belushi as "Joliet" Jake Blues, "I Don't Know" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 14:44:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from donna.risc.lv (donna.risc.lv [159.148.12.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2F314C1E for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 14:44:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from vic@rezekne.lv) Received: from rezekne.lv (vic.risc.lv [159.148.12.22]) by donna.risc.lv (8.9.3/X.Y.Z) with ESMTP id AAA18778 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 00:44:30 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from vic@rezekne.lv) Message-ID: <37E164BE.BAECADE0@rezekne.lv> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 00:44:30 +0300 From: Victor Meirans Organization: Rezekne Internet Service Center (http://www.risc.lv) X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en,zh-CN,zh-TW,zh,ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD ISP mailing list Subject: What am I doing wrong? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello... I need to set up a FreeBSD (3.2-RELEASE) router with NAT. 2 NICs. The situation is: Internet | | --------159.148.42.241 |Router|------------------ --------255.255.255.252 | | | |159.148.42.242 |255.255.255.252 ------------- | FreeBSD | ------------- |192.168.1.254 |255.255.255.0 | | --------------- |-----------------------|Local network| |192.168.1.0 | |255.255.255.0| --------------- What I did: 1. Compiled kernel with options IPFIREWALL options IPDIVERT 2. My rc.conf is moused_port="/dev/psm0" moused_enable="YES" saver="logo" gateway_enable="YES" firewall_enable="YES" natd_enable="YES" natd_interface="ed1" natd_flags="-f /etc/natd.conf" hostname="ufo.blezurs.lv" ifconfig_ed2="inet 192.168.1.254 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_ed1="inet 159.148.42.242 netmask 255.255.255.252" defaultrouter="159.148.42.241" network_interfaces="ed2 ed1 lo0" linux_enable="YES" ntpdate_enable="YES" ntpdate_flags="Time1.Stupi.SE" named_enable="YES" 3. My rc.firewall is /sbin/ipfw -f flush /sbin/ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via ed1 /sbin/ipfw add pass all from any to any 4. My rc.local just runs natd natd -f /etc/natd.conf 5. My natd.conf is interface ed1 use_sockets yes same_ports yes dinamic yes That's all. Nothing works. I can't ping the router nor I can ping local addresses. Am I missing something? Is something misconfigured? Thanks in advance... -- ---> ViC <--- --==> Rezekne Internet Service Center http://www.risc.lv "PCT Latgale" Ltd. Phone: +371-4622972 Baznicas 17, Rezekne, Fax: +371-4625931 LV-4601, Latvia GSM: +371-9577569 -==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 15:26:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from pau-amma.whistle.com (pau-amma.whistle.com [207.76.205.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99EAA152D7 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 15:26:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dhw@whistle.com) Received: (from dhw@localhost) by pau-amma.whistle.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id PAA04452; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 15:26:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 15:26:45 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <199909162226.PAA04452@pau-amma.whistle.com> To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, vic@rezekne.lv Subject: Re: What am I doing wrong? In-Reply-To: <37E164BE.BAECADE0@rezekne.lv> Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 00:44:30 +0300 >From: Victor Meirans >Hello... >I need to set up a FreeBSD (3.2-RELEASE) router with NAT. 2 NICs. OK; I do something similar for home, except that I have only a single (fixed) external IP address (and no separate router -- DSL). And mine seems to work. :-} >1. Compiled kernel with > options IPFIREWALL > options IPDIVERT I included IPFIREWALL_FORWARD (as well as IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE -- but the latter is because I reject anything unless I decided that I want to pass it). >2. My rc.conf is > moused_port="/dev/psm0" > moused_enable="YES" > saver="logo" > gateway_enable="YES" > firewall_enable="YES" > natd_enable="YES" > natd_interface="ed1" > natd_flags="-f /etc/natd.conf" Those natd_* variables should cause /etc/rc.network to bring up natd; you mention (below) that you start up natd in rc.local, but I don't think that should be necessary (or desirable). > hostname="ufo.blezurs.lv" > ifconfig_ed2="inet 192.168.1.254 netmask 255.255.255.0" > ifconfig_ed1="inet 159.148.42.242 netmask 255.255.255.252" > defaultrouter="159.148.42.241" > network_interfaces="ed2 ed1 lo0" > linux_enable="YES" > ntpdate_enable="YES" > ntpdate_flags="Time1.Stupi.SE" > named_enable="YES" >3. My rc.firewall is > /sbin/ipfw -f flush > /sbin/ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via ed1 > /sbin/ipfw add pass all from any to any >4. My rc.local just runs natd > natd -f /etc/natd.conf As above, I don't believe you want this happening at this point. rc.network should be doing it. >5. My natd.conf is > interface ed1 > use_sockets yes > same_ports yes > dinamic yes Hmmm.... I haven't tried using the "dynamic" (note spelling) option. Other than some "redirect_port" options, the entries I have are: use_sockets yes same_ports yes >That's all. Nothing works. I can't ping the router nor I can ping local >addresses. Am I missing something? Is something misconfigured? Well, what do the routing tables ("netstat -nr") look like? The interface configurations? ("ifconfig -a") Are you seeing any messages getting logged anywhere? Have you tried turning on tcpdump to see what's happening? Cheers, david -- David Wolfskill dhw@whistle.com UNIX System Administrator voice: (650) 577-7158 pager: (888) 347-0197 FAX: (650) 372-5915 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 16: 8:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from magicnet.magicnet.net (magicnet.magicnet.net [204.96.116.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8C214D78 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 16:08:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bill@bilver.magicnet.net) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by magicnet.magicnet.net (8.8.6/8.8.8) with UUCP id TAA22904 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 19:07:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from bill@localhost) by bilver.magicnet.net (8.9.2/8.9.1) id SAA31017 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 18:24:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 18:24:47 -0400 From: Bill Vermillion To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dig @a.root-servers.net.. status: NXDOMAIN ?? Message-ID: <19990916182446.A30954@bilver.magicnet.net> References: <199909161531.KAA37312@www.SLipmat.net> <199909161643.KAA08662@mt.sri.com> <199909161650.LAA37748@www.SLipmat.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre1i In-Reply-To: <199909161650.LAA37748@www.SLipmat.net> Organization: Vermillion Consulting Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 11:50:19AM -0500, Brian Scott spewed forth: > I'd always relied on seeing "Status: HOLD" in the whois > of a domain if it was disabled due to payment, however > they're not doing that anymore =( They stopped doing that. The problem was that domain grabbers were checking millions of times a day for 'on hold' and continually requesting those addresses. The instant they became available they were grabbed. So that's why there is no HOLD status shown anymore. Bill -- Bill Vermillion bv @ wjv.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 16:24:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mailf.telia.com (mailf.telia.com [194.22.194.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47AF114FBC for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 16:24:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Received: from stordatan.telia.com (t2o62p10.telia.com [195.198.198.70]) by mailf.telia.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA20745; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 01:24:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from partitur.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stordatan.telia.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA37332; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 01:24:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Message-ID: <37E17C1C.93773726@partitur.se> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 01:24:12 +0200 From: Palle Girgensohn Organization: Partitur X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.0.36 i386) X-Accept-Language: sv, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: river Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fxp0: device timeout References: <21DC5E98AE1FD311B1290020AFDB6C6E63D1@cx288885-b.okcs1.ok.home.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org river wrote: > > It sounds as if they have the switch and the netcard config'd differently. > I.E. switch half duplex and NIC full duplex or vice versa. I have seen this > before and it causes horrible network performance just like you are > describing. If the NIC is set to 100mb full duplex have them check the > switch. Also, fxp0's are notorious for not detecting full duplex, check the > log files if it is set to auto-detect.... > Ahh... It is set to auto-detect, and they claim it initially didn't detect full duplex, and that's why they set the switch to simplex (so they say, anyway, and I they're right). The NIC is running at simplex speed. I still believe the problems span from network congestion, since it works fine at off office hours, but this explains why they couldn't run at full duplex. I'll set it to full-duplex, no autosensing. Is it the driver or the NIC not detecting? Thanks! /Palle > hope this helps > > -----Original Message----- > From: Palle Girgensohn [mailto:girgen@partitur.se] > Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 1999 7:54 PM > To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org > Subject: fxp0: device timeout > > Hi! > > fxp0: device timeout... I suppose this probably means that the network > is statured, right? > > Are there any problems running fxp0 in full duplex? > > This machine is running at a client's site, and they complain it's slow, > still the CPU is idle and I get the impression their entire LAN is > completely satured. They had problems starting the machine in full > duplex so they set the NIC up in simplex (by configuring the network > switch it is connected to). Can they just pull the rj45 LAN connection, > reconfig the switch and put the cord back in, or do they need to do a > ifconfig down && ifconfig up? > > FreeBSD-3-STABLE from beginning of July. 2 proc SMP, 400 MHz, lots of > RAM. > > Thanks for any input. > > /Palle > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Sep 16 18:44: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from implode.root.com (root.com [209.102.106.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDAF314CA9 for ; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 18:44:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dg@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA15206; Thu, 16 Sep 1999 18:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199909170143.SAA15206@implode.root.com> To: Palle Girgensohn Cc: river , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fxp0: device timeout In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 17 Sep 1999 01:24:12 +0200." <37E17C1C.93773726@partitur.se> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 18:43:01 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "simplex" isn't a duplex indicator; it indicates whether the interface can hear its own broadcasts. Assuming that you meant half-duplex, then it's probably the switch that is at fault, especially if it is a Cisco which always seems to get autonegotiation wrong. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Creator of high-performance Internet servers - http://www.terasolutions.com Pave the road of life with opportunities. >> It sounds as if they have the switch and the netcard config'd differently. >> I.E. switch half duplex and NIC full duplex or vice versa. I have seen this >> before and it causes horrible network performance just like you are >> describing. If the NIC is set to 100mb full duplex have them check the >> switch. Also, fxp0's are notorious for not detecting full duplex, check the >> log files if it is set to auto-detect.... >> > >Ahh... It is set to auto-detect, and they claim it initially didn't >detect full duplex, and that's why they set the switch to simplex (so >they say, anyway, and I they're right). The NIC is running at simplex >speed. I still believe the problems span from network congestion, since >it works fine at off office hours, but this explains why they couldn't >run at full duplex. > >I'll set it to full-duplex, no autosensing. Is it the driver or the NIC >not detecting? > >Thanks! > >/Palle > >> hope this helps >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Palle Girgensohn [mailto:girgen@partitur.se] >> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 1999 7:54 PM >> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org >> Subject: fxp0: device timeout >> >> Hi! >> >> fxp0: device timeout... I suppose this probably means that the network >> is statured, right? >> >> Are there any problems running fxp0 in full duplex? >> >> This machine is running at a client's site, and they complain it's slow, >> still the CPU is idle and I get the impression their entire LAN is >> completely satured. They had problems starting the machine in full >> duplex so they set the NIC up in simplex (by configuring the network >> switch it is connected to). Can they just pull the rj45 LAN connection, >> reconfig the switch and put the cord back in, or do they need to do a >> ifconfig down && ifconfig up? >> >> FreeBSD-3-STABLE from beginning of July. 2 proc SMP, 400 MHz, lots of >> RAM. >> >> Thanks for any input. >> >> /Palle >> >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message >> >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 0:12:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from server.research.zopps.fi (ws99.research.zopps.fi [195.165.196.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE1F14D8D for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 00:12:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from martti@research.zopps.fi) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by server.research.zopps.fi (8.9.3/8.8.8) id KAA10094 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 10:12:23 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from martti.kuparinen) Received: from ws125.research.zopps.fi(195.165.196.125) via SMTP by ws99.research.zopps.fi, id smtpdA10089; Fri Sep 17 10:12:20 1999 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 10:12:24 +0300 (EEST) From: Martti Kuparinen To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Adding a new disk to vinum Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi! I'm building a server based on FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE and I thought I'd use vinum for /var/spool/imap (for Cyrus IMAP server) to create a large filesystem (say 3x9 GB as a single fs -- i.e. to use concat). But what if I have to add a new disk, must I run newfs for the whole vinum thing (=backup the old stuff first) or can I just expand the existing configuration to include also the new disk? What other alternatives do I have (besides HW solutions)? Martti To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 2:41:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from bastuba.partitur.se (bastuba.partitur.se [193.219.246.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742A1154DE for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 02:41:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Received: from elbas.partitur.se (elbas.partitur.se [193.219.246.222]) by bastuba.partitur.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA24742; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 11:41:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Received: from partitur.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elbas.partitur.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA42783; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 11:41:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Message-ID: <37E20CBE.BFC69E55@partitur.se> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 11:41:18 +0200 From: Palle Girgensohn Organization: Partitur X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: sv, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dg@root.com Cc: river , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fxp0: device timeout References: <199909170143.SAA15206@implode.root.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org David Greenman wrote: > > "simplex" isn't a duplex indicator; it indicates whether the interface can > hear its own broadcasts. Assuming that you meant half-duplex, then it's > probably the switch that is at fault, especially if it is a Cisco which > always seems to get autonegotiation wrong. > oops... I've never bothered to check this. Here's the report from ifconfig: $ ifconfig fxp0 fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 193.10.208.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 193.10.208.255 ether 00:a0:c9:ac:e7:75 media: autoselect (100baseTX) status: active supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP I guess I can set the switch to full-duplex, no auto-sensing, and ifconfig the NIC with 'media full-duplex', right? /Palle > -DG > > David Greenman > Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org > Creator of high-performance Internet servers - http://www.terasolutions.com > Pave the road of life with opportunities. > > >> It sounds as if they have the switch and the netcard config'd differently. > >> I.E. switch half duplex and NIC full duplex or vice versa. I have seen this > >> before and it causes horrible network performance just like you are > >> describing. If the NIC is set to 100mb full duplex have them check the > >> switch. Also, fxp0's are notorious for not detecting full duplex, check the > >> log files if it is set to auto-detect.... > >> > > > >Ahh... It is set to auto-detect, and they claim it initially didn't > >detect full duplex, and that's why they set the switch to simplex (so > >they say, anyway, and I they're right). The NIC is running at simplex > >speed. I still believe the problems span from network congestion, since > >it works fine at off office hours, but this explains why they couldn't > >run at full duplex. > > > >I'll set it to full-duplex, no autosensing. Is it the driver or the NIC > >not detecting? > > > >Thanks! > > > >/Palle > > > >> hope this helps > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Palle Girgensohn [mailto:girgen@partitur.se] > >> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 1999 7:54 PM > >> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org > >> Subject: fxp0: device timeout > >> > >> Hi! > >> > >> fxp0: device timeout... I suppose this probably means that the network > >> is statured, right? > >> > >> Are there any problems running fxp0 in full duplex? > >> > >> This machine is running at a client's site, and they complain it's slow, > >> still the CPU is idle and I get the impression their entire LAN is > >> completely satured. They had problems starting the machine in full > >> duplex so they set the NIC up in simplex (by configuring the network > >> switch it is connected to). Can they just pull the rj45 LAN connection, > >> reconfig the switch and put the cord back in, or do they need to do a > >> ifconfig down && ifconfig up? > >> > >> FreeBSD-3-STABLE from beginning of July. 2 proc SMP, 400 MHz, lots of > >> RAM. > >> > >> Thanks for any input. > >> > >> /Palle > >> > >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > >> > >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 3:35: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from voyager.vt.pl (voyager.vt.pl [212.160.98.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BBD514F80 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 03:34:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bs@vt.pl) Received: (qmail 61395 invoked by uid 1000); 17 Sep 1999 10:33:59 -0000 From: "Bartek Siebab" Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 12:33:59 +0200 To: FreeBSD ISP mailing list Subject: Re: What am I doing wrong? Message-ID: <19990917123358.A61388@vt.pl> References: <37E164BE.BAECADE0@rezekne.lv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?=3C37E164BE=2EBAECADE0=40rezekne=2Elv=3E=3B_from_Victor_M?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?eirans_on_Pi=B1=2C_Wrz_17=2C_1999_at_12:44:30_+0300?= Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Victor Meirans (vic@rezekne.lv) [990917 00:45]: > Hello... > I need to set up a FreeBSD (3.2-RELEASE) router with NAT. 2 NICs. > The situation is: --<>-- > 5. My natd.conf is > interface ed1 > use_sockets yes > same_ports yes > dinamic yes > add entry with: unregistered_only yes > That's all. Nothing works. I can't ping the router nor I can ping local > addresses. Am I missing something? Is something misconfigured? check if natd is running and ping from LAN your inside interface then outside interface on FreeBSD box. -- ______________________ Bartek Siebab bs@vt.pl bsiebab@rubikon.net.pl ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 4:19:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from implode.root.com (root.com [209.102.106.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6EE14F84 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 04:19:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dg@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA16082; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 04:19:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199909171119.EAA16082@implode.root.com> To: Palle Girgensohn Cc: river , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fxp0: device timeout In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 17 Sep 1999 11:41:18 +0200." <37E20CBE.BFC69E55@partitur.se> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 04:19:02 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >oops... I've never bothered to check this. Here's the report from >ifconfig: > >$ ifconfig fxp0 >fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet 193.10.208.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 193.10.208.255 > ether 00:a0:c9:ac:e7:75 > media: autoselect (100baseTX) status: active > supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX >10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP > > >I guess I can set the switch to full-duplex, no auto-sensing, and >ifconfig the NIC with 'media full-duplex', right? Actually what you want is: ifconfig fxp0 media 100basetx mediaopt full-duplex Also be sure that the switch is configured the same and keep in mind that whenever you specify something other than auto for either the speed or the duplex that autonegotiation is completely disabled, so both sides must be set the same for it to work. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Creator of high-performance Internet servers - http://www.terasolutions.com Pave the road of life with opportunities. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 4:37:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from volodya.prime.net.ua (volodya.prime.net.ua [195.64.229.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A0C1530B for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 04:37:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andyo@prime.net.ua) Received: from prime.net.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by volodya.prime.net.ua (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA01589; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:37:50 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from andyo@prime.net.ua) Message-ID: <37E2280A.E43F323@prime.net.ua> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:37:47 +0300 From: "Andy V. Oleynik" Organization: M-Info X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en, ru, uk MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Victor Meirans Cc: FreeBSD ISP mailing list Subject: Re: What am I doing wrong? References: <37E164BE.BAECADE0@rezekne.lv> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Just assign natd_flags "-n ed1 -u" value. My internal network runs pretty with this setup. Victor Meirans wrote: > Hello... > I need to set up a FreeBSD (3.2-RELEASE) router with NAT. 2 NICs. > The situation is: > > Internet > | > | > --------159.148.42.241 > |Router|------------------ > --------255.255.255.252 | > | > | > |159.148.42.242 > |255.255.255.252 > ------------- > | FreeBSD | > ------------- > |192.168.1.254 > |255.255.255.0 > | > | --------------- > |-----------------------|Local network| > |192.168.1.0 | > |255.255.255.0| > --------------- > > What I did: > > 1. Compiled kernel with > options IPFIREWALL > options IPDIVERT > > 2. My rc.conf is > moused_port="/dev/psm0" > moused_enable="YES" > saver="logo" > gateway_enable="YES" > firewall_enable="YES" > natd_enable="YES" > natd_interface="ed1" > natd_flags="-f /etc/natd.conf" > hostname="ufo.blezurs.lv" > ifconfig_ed2="inet 192.168.1.254 netmask 255.255.255.0" > ifconfig_ed1="inet 159.148.42.242 netmask 255.255.255.252" > defaultrouter="159.148.42.241" > network_interfaces="ed2 ed1 lo0" > linux_enable="YES" > ntpdate_enable="YES" > ntpdate_flags="Time1.Stupi.SE" > named_enable="YES" > > 3. My rc.firewall is > /sbin/ipfw -f flush > /sbin/ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via ed1 > /sbin/ipfw add pass all from any to any > > 4. My rc.local just runs natd > > natd -f /etc/natd.conf > > 5. My natd.conf is > interface ed1 > use_sockets yes > same_ports yes > dinamic yes > > That's all. Nothing works. I can't ping the router nor I can ping local > addresses. Am I missing something? Is something misconfigured? > Thanks in advance... > > -- > ---> ViC <--- > > --==> Rezekne Internet Service Center http://www.risc.lv > "PCT Latgale" Ltd. Phone: +371-4622972 > Baznicas 17, Rezekne, Fax: +371-4625931 > LV-4601, Latvia GSM: +371-9577569 > -==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==--==- > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message -- WBW Andy V. Oleynik (When U work in virtual office prime.net.ua's U have good chance to obtain system administrator virtual money ö%-) +380442448363 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 4:38:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from volodya.prime.net.ua (volodya.prime.net.ua [195.64.229.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1554015256 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 04:38:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andyo@prime.net.ua) Received: from prime.net.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by volodya.prime.net.ua (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA01596 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:40:24 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from andyo@prime.net.ua) Message-ID: <37E228A7.7988D12F@prime.net.ua> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:40:24 +0300 From: "Andy V. Oleynik" Organization: M-Info X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en, ru, uk MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: slightly offtopic: Tier 1 ISP in Europe? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, folks, who can point whois Tier 1 ISP in Europe? -- WBW Andy V. Oleynik (When U work in virtual office prime.net.ua's U have good chance to obtain system administrator virtual money ö%-) +380442448363 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 4:49:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from gw.caamora.com.au (jonath5.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.41.237]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3B615425 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 04:49:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jon@gw.caamora.com.au) Received: (from jon@localhost) by gw.caamora.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) id VAA02531; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 21:49:14 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from jon) Message-ID: <19990917214913.A2505@caamora.com.au> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 21:49:13 +1000 From: jonathan michaels To: dg@root.com, Palle Girgensohn Cc: river , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fxp0: device timeout Mail-Followup-To: dg@root.com, Palle Girgensohn , river , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG References: <37E20CBE.BFC69E55@partitur.se> <199909171119.EAA16082@implode.root.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i In-Reply-To: <199909171119.EAA16082@implode.root.com>; from David Greenman on Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 04:19:02AM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD gw.caamora.com.au 2.2.7-RELEASE i386 X-Mood: i'm alive, if it counts Organisation: Caamora, PO Box 144, Rosebery NSW 1445 Australia Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 04:19:02AM -0700, David Greenman wrote: > >oops... I've never bothered to check this. Here's the report from > >ifconfig: > > > >$ ifconfig fxp0 > >fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > inet 193.10.208.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 193.10.208.255 > > ether 00:a0:c9:ac:e7:75 > > media: autoselect (100baseTX) status: active > > supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX > >10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP > > > > > >I guess I can set the switch to full-duplex, no auto-sensing, and > >ifconfig the NIC with 'media full-duplex', right? > > Actually what you want is: > > ifconfig fxp0 media 100basetx mediaopt full-duplex > > Also be sure that the switch is configured the same and keep in mind that > whenever you specify something other than auto for either the speed or the > duplex that autonegotiation is completely disabled, so both sides must be > set the same for it to work. i just purchased one of these (intel etherexpress pro pci 10/100tx) and plan to use it in a 10 mbit ethernet network. so i assume that i will need to make apropriate changes for 10 mb working and i should be ok. sorry for this almost silly question, i've had some serious trouble with a smc pci 10/100tx (thier proprietry chipset -9432tx something) from what i've read recently i've gone from "bad to worse" with respect to my nic choices. i was looking for a plugin and forget solution like the old smc etherelite nic's used to be. thank you for your time and sorry for the intrusion. regards jonathan -- =============================================================================== Jonathan Michaels PO Box 144, Rosebery, NSW 1445 Australia =========================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 5:45:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from bastuba.partitur.se (bastuba.partitur.se [193.219.246.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8261E14D6D for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 05:45:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Received: from elbas.partitur.se (elbas.partitur.se [193.219.246.222]) by bastuba.partitur.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA26336; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:45:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Received: from partitur.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elbas.partitur.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA43177; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:45:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Message-ID: <37E237EF.700657BB@partitur.se> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:45:35 +0200 From: Palle Girgensohn Organization: Partitur X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: sv, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jonathan michaels Cc: dg@root.com, river , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fxp0: device timeout References: <37E20CBE.BFC69E55@partitur.se> <199909171119.EAA16082@implode.root.com> <19990917214913.A2505@caamora.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org jonathan michaels wrote: > > sorry for this almost silly question, i've had some serious > trouble with a smc pci 10/100tx (thier proprietry chipset > -9432tx something) from what i've read recently i've gone from > "bad to worse" with respect to my nic choices. i was looking > for a plugin and forget solution like the old smc etherelite > nic's used to be. > I use almost solely 'fxp' (etherexpress), and they work fine for me (half-duplex, 100Mbps). With full-duplex, they seem to have to be manually configured (ifconfig fxp0 type full-duplex, I guess). /Palle To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 5:47:41 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from bastuba.partitur.se (bastuba.partitur.se [193.219.246.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B048414C15 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 05:47:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Received: from elbas.partitur.se (elbas.partitur.se [193.219.246.222]) by bastuba.partitur.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA26378; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:47:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Received: from partitur.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elbas.partitur.se (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA43218; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:47:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Message-ID: <37E2385C.4D09A50E@partitur.se> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:47:24 +0200 From: Palle Girgensohn Organization: Partitur X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.2-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: sv, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dg@root.com Cc: river , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fxp0: device timeout References: <199909171119.EAA16082@implode.root.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org David Greenman wrote: > > >oops... I've never bothered to check this. Here's the report from > >ifconfig: > > > >$ ifconfig fxp0 > >fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > > inet 193.10.208.65 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 193.10.208.255 > > ether 00:a0:c9:ac:e7:75 > > media: autoselect (100baseTX) status: active > > supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX > >10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP > > > > > >I guess I can set the switch to full-duplex, no auto-sensing, and > >ifconfig the NIC with 'media full-duplex', right? > > Actually what you want is: > > ifconfig fxp0 media 100basetx mediaopt full-duplex > > Also be sure that the switch is configured the same and keep in mind that > whenever you specify something other than auto for either the speed or the > duplex that autonegotiation is completely disabled, so both sides must be > set the same for it to work. > Thanks. I should read the man page more carefully next time. :) /Palle To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 6:28:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.skynetweb.com (mail.hecenter.com [208.231.1.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7CC114A08 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 06:28:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pryker@skynetweb.com) Received: from skynetweb.com [208.231.1.80] by mail.skynetweb.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-5.04) id A337B1E0194; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 09:33:43 EDT Message-ID: <37E1F80B.A91138C8@skynetweb.com> Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 09:12:59 +0100 From: Phillip Ryker Reply-To: pryker@skynetweb.com Organization: SkyNetWEB Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Tape Drive Insanity!! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I am confused as how to use a tape system under FreeBSD. I have a system running FreeBSD v3.3 -STABLE. I have completed a recent make world and have built a custom kernel to support the tape system. The Tape system I am using is a Seagate Travan SCSI 4 - 8 gig system. The tape is seen as device sa0. When I type the following command: mt status I get: Mode Density Blocksize bpi Compression Current: 0x45 variable 0 enable ---------available modes--------- 0: 0x45 variable 0 enable 1: 0x45 variable 0 enable 2: 0x45 variable 0 enable 3: 0x45 variable 0 enable --------------------------------- Current Driver State: at rest. --------------------------------- File Number: 0 Record Number: 0 I read through the handbook and I did exactly what it asks. I did a: mt fsf 1 And I got the following error: mt: /dev/nrsa0: fsf: Input/output error And the /var/log/messages reports: Sep 17 14:38:06 ns5 /kernel: (sa0:ahc0:0:4:0): SPACE. CDB: 11 1 0 0 1 0 Sep 17 14:38:06 ns5 /kernel: (sa0:ahc0:0:4:0): BLANK CHECK req sz: 1 (decimal) asc:0,5 Sep 17 14:38:06 ns5 /kernel: (sa0:ahc0:0:4:0): End-of-data detected ALso, when I try to run a dump as follows: dump -0u /etc I get the following: bash-2.03# dump -0u /etc DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Fri Sep 17 14:40:02 1999 DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch DUMP: Dumping /etc to /dev/rsa0 DUMP: bad sblock magic number DUMP: The ENTIRE dump is aborted. Any insight on what I am doing wrong here or any help would be greatly appreciated!! Thank you To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 8:35: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from unix.megared.net.mx (megamail.megared.com.mx [207.249.162.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63B1153FE for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 08:34:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from abc@megared.net.mx) Received: from ales (ales.megared.net.mx [207.249.163.252]) by unix.megared.net.mx (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA84142; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 10:34:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from abc@megared.net.mx) Message-ID: <008701bf0122$1bf1a3c0$fca3f9cf@megared.net.mx> Reply-To: "Alejandro Ramirez" From: "Alejandro Ramirez" To: , References: <37E1F80B.A91138C8@skynetweb.com> Subject: RE: Tape Drive Insanity!! Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 10:34:19 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, Try something like this (put it in a script): /usr/bin/mt -f /dev/rsa0 rewind /usr/bin/mt -f /dev/rsa0 comp on /sbin/dump -0auf /dev/nrsa0 / /sbin/dump -0auf /dev/nrsa0 /usr /sbin/dump -0auf /dev/nrsa0 /var /usr/bin/mt -f /dev/rsa0 rewind This works for me... BTW what the Handbook says about "mt fsf 1" applies only for QIC Tapes, not for DDS ones. Ales ----- Original Message ----- From: Phillip Ryker To: Sent: Friday, September 17, 1999 3:12 AM Subject: Tape Drive Insanity!! > I am confused as how to use a tape system under FreeBSD. I have a > system running FreeBSD v3.3 -STABLE. I have completed a recent make > world and have built a custom kernel to support the tape system. > > The Tape system I am using is a Seagate Travan SCSI 4 - 8 gig system. > The tape is seen as device sa0. When I type the following command: > > mt status > > I get: > > Mode Density Blocksize bpi Compression > Current: 0x45 variable 0 enable > ---------available modes--------- > 0: 0x45 variable 0 enable > 1: 0x45 variable 0 enable > 2: 0x45 variable 0 enable > 3: 0x45 variable 0 enable > --------------------------------- > Current Driver State: at rest. > --------------------------------- > File Number: 0 Record Number: 0 > > I read through the handbook and I did exactly what it asks. I did a: > > mt fsf 1 > > And I got the following error: > > mt: /dev/nrsa0: fsf: Input/output error > > And the /var/log/messages reports: > > Sep 17 14:38:06 ns5 /kernel: (sa0:ahc0:0:4:0): SPACE. CDB: 11 1 > 0 > 0 1 0 > Sep 17 14:38:06 ns5 /kernel: (sa0:ahc0:0:4:0): BLANK CHECK req sz: 1 > (decimal) asc:0,5 > Sep 17 14:38:06 ns5 /kernel: (sa0:ahc0:0:4:0): End-of-data detected > > ALso, when I try to run a dump as follows: > > dump -0u /etc > > I get the following: > > bash-2.03# dump -0u /etc > DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Fri Sep 17 14:40:02 1999 > DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch > DUMP: Dumping /etc to /dev/rsa0 > DUMP: bad sblock magic number > DUMP: The ENTIRE dump is aborted. > > Any insight on what I am doing wrong here or any help would be greatly > appreciated!! > > Thank you > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 8:42:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from guardian.fortress.org (guardian-ext.fortress.org [199.202.137.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9CBC14EB4 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 08:42:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andrew@guardian.fortress.org) Received: from localhost (andrew@localhost) by guardian.fortress.org (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA13119; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 11:42:26 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from andrew@guardian.fortress.org) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 11:42:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Andrew Webster Reply-To: andrew@pubnix.net To: Phillip Ryker Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Tape Drive Insanity!! In-Reply-To: <37E1F80B.A91138C8@skynetweb.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Phillip Ryker wrote: > I am confused as how to use a tape system under FreeBSD. I have a > system running FreeBSD v3.3 -STABLE. I have completed a recent make > world and have built a custom kernel to support the tape system. [ snip ] > > I read through the handbook and I did exactly what it asks. I did a: > > mt fsf 1 > > And I got the following error: > > mt: /dev/nrsa0: fsf: Input/output error Could it be that there is nothing on the tape? You can't fast-forward to the next file-mark if you haven't written anything yet. > > And the /var/log/messages reports: > > Sep 17 14:38:06 ns5 /kernel: (sa0:ahc0:0:4:0): SPACE. CDB: 11 1 > 0 > 0 1 0 > Sep 17 14:38:06 ns5 /kernel: (sa0:ahc0:0:4:0): BLANK CHECK req sz: 1 > (decimal) asc:0,5 > Sep 17 14:38:06 ns5 /kernel: (sa0:ahc0:0:4:0): End-of-data detected > > ALso, when I try to run a dump as follows: > > dump -0u /etc > > I get the following: > > bash-2.03# dump -0u /etc > DUMP: Date of this level 0 dump: Fri Sep 17 14:40:02 1999 > DUMP: Date of last level 0 dump: the epoch > DUMP: Dumping /etc to /dev/rsa0 > DUMP: bad sblock magic number > DUMP: The ENTIRE dump is aborted. > > Any insight on what I am doing wrong here or any help would be greatly > appreciated!! This is not the correct usage of dump. You can only dump filesystems, not arbitrary directories (unless you /etc is in a separate filesystem). You'd want to do dump 0uf /dev/nrsa0 /usr for example. This tells dump you want to backup /usr onto /dev/nrsa0 Andrew Webster andrew@pubnix.net PubNIX Inc. CF E8 16 B8 A6 DB E3 C9 83 E7 96 24 25 58 15 6E P.O. Box 147 Cote Saint Luc, Quebec H4V 2Y3 tel 514-990-5911 http://www.pubnix.net fax 514-990-9443 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 8:58: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from arnold.neland.dk (mail.neland.dk [194.255.12.232]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49BD815513 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 08:58:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arnold.neland.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA69960 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 17:59:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 17:59:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Leif Neland To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: inn paused Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Somehow my inn is paused. when I say # ctlinnd go It replies "usage ctlinnd go reason" # ctlinnd go because I want you to and I am root goddammit Reply: wrong reason How do I start the stubborn bastard? Leif To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 9: 4:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from chew-z.dialla.com (albemuth.dialla.com [62.244.20.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B7915880 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 09:04:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jc@dialla.com) Received: from jc by chew-z.dialla.com with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11S0WY-000A5I-00 for freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 19:06:10 +0300 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 19:06:10 +0300 From: "Igor A. Karpov" To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: inn paused Message-ID: <19990917190610.A38753@dialla.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre1i In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 05:59:17PM +0200, Leif Neland wrote: > Somehow my inn is paused. > when I say > # ctlinnd go > It replies "usage ctlinnd go reason" > # ctlinnd go because I want you to and I am root goddammit > Reply: wrong reason > > How do I start the stubborn bastard? > > Leif > > # ctlinnd go "because I want you to and I am root goddammit" > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message -- Igor A. Karpov phone: +380(44)573-8754 System Administrator +380(44)254-2450 "Reality is that which when you stop believing in it does not go away" Philip Kindred Dick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 9: 4:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from pau-amma.whistle.com (pau-amma.whistle.com [207.76.205.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA801588A for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 09:04:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dhw@whistle.com) Received: (from dhw@localhost) by pau-amma.whistle.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id JAA08703; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 09:04:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 09:04:33 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <199909171604.JAA08703@pau-amma.whistle.com> To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG, leifn@neland.dk Subject: Re: inn paused In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 17:59:17 +0200 (CEST) >From: Leif Neland >Somehow my inn is paused. >when I say ># ctlinnd go >It replies "usage ctlinnd go reason" ># ctlinnd go because I want you to and I am root goddammit >Reply: wrong reason >How do I start the stubborn bastard? Use the same "reason" that it paused. When you ask it for its status, and it tells you it is "paused," it should also provide some text that might (charitably) be called a "reason". Use exactly that same sequence of characters when you tell it to "go". Cheers, david -- David Wolfskill dhw@whistle.com UNIX System Administrator voice: (650) 577-7158 pager: (888) 347-0197 FAX: (650) 372-5915 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 9: 9:41 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from www.SLipmat.net (slipmat.net [216.4.88.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC0D11582F for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 09:09:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian.scott@soulphusionrecords.com) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by www.SLipmat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA03759; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 11:08:18 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from brian.scott@soulphusionrecords.com) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 11:08:18 -0500 (CDT) Message-Id: <199909171608.LAA03759@www.SLipmat.net> X-Authentication-Warning: www.SLipmat.net: nobody set sender to brian.scott@soulphusionrecords.com using -f From: Brian Scott To: Leif Neland Reply-To: Brian Scott Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: IMP/PHP3 Imap webMail Program 2.0.10 Subject: Re: inn paused Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Try putting the 3rd variable ($reason) in quotes like.. # ctlinnd go "because I want you to and I am root" .o0 Brian McGowan 0o. Chief Network Administrator Worldnet Communications Inc. -=Powered by FreeBSD=- Quoting Leif Neland : > Somehow my inn is paused. > when I say > # ctlinnd go > It replies "usage ctlinnd go reason" > # ctlinnd go because I want you to and I am root goddammit > Reply: wrong reason > > How do I start the stubborn bastard? > > Leif > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 9:10: 6 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.alpha1.net (mail.alpha1.net [216.88.112.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC90157F2 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 09:10:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marius@alpha1.net) Received: from swedishchef.alpha1.net (IDENT:marius@swedishchef.alpha1.net [216.88.237.10]) by mail.alpha1.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA05399; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 11:08:47 -0500 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 11:08:20 -0500 (CDT) From: Marius Strom To: Leif Neland Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: inn paused In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I think the problem here is that you don't know the reason it was paused. Run ctlinnd status (I think) and it will give you the reason. -- Marius Strom Professional Geek/Unix System Administrator Alpha1 Internet http://www.marius.org/marius.pgp 0x5645C228 In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice... ...In practice, there is a big difference. On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Leif Neland wrote: > Somehow my inn is paused. > when I say > # ctlinnd go > It replies "usage ctlinnd go reason" > # ctlinnd go because I want you to and I am root goddammit > Reply: wrong reason > > How do I start the stubborn bastard? > > Leif > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 9:11:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from rs5s2.datacenter.cha.cantv.net (rs5s2.datacenter.cha.cantv.net [200.44.32.55]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78D315752 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 09:11:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alvaro@cantv.net) Received: from airfox (ws-97.chacao-01.int.cantv.net [200.44.44.113]) by rs5s2.datacenter.cha.cantv.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1/1.0) with SMTP id MAA28899; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 12:08:01 -0400 (VET) Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19990917120822.03a05b38@pop.cantv.net> X-Sender: alvaro@pop.cantv.net X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.1 (32) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 12:08:22 -0400 To: Steve Hovey From: Alvaro Carvajal Subject: [Fwd: sendmail question] Cc: luis@cantv.net, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, We were using something similar. We had the mail stored on a file-per-message basis on directories like /home/??/user/Maildir, where ?? was a two character word formed with a hash function applied on the login. For this we used sendmail-8.9.1 and delivered the mail locally with procmail compiled with the maildir patches. The home directories for the users were something like /home/??/user. Hope this helps. -alvaro >-------- Original Message -------- >Subject: sendmail question >Date: Thu, 16 Sep 1999 09:48:08 -0400 (EDT) >From: Steve Hovey >To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG > > >is there a way with the newer sendmail's to set up a hashing for user >inbox? like instead of /var/spool/mail/shovey - have it go to >/usr/mail/s/h/shovey ? > >Thanx > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 9:12:41 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from filer4.isc.rit.edu (filer4.isc.rit.edu [129.21.3.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3D01587F for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 09:12:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jcptch@osfmail.isc.rit.edu) Received: from grace ("port 2523"@[129.21.3.102]) by osfmail.isc.rit.edu (PMDF V5.2-32 #21576) with SMTP id <0FI7004PQOWIJ1@osfmail.isc.rit.edu> for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 12:09:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: by grace (5.65v4.0/1.1.19.2/21Sep98-0910AM) id AA26305; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 12:09:52 -0400 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 12:09:52 -0400 From: Jon Parise Subject: Re: inn paused In-reply-to: ; from leifn@neland.dk on Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 05:59:17PM +0200 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Mail-followup-to: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Message-id: <19990917120951.A30587@osfmail.isc.rit.edu> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.96.3i X-Operating-System: OSF1 V4.0 (alpha) References: Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 05:59:17PM +0200, Leif Neland wrote: > Somehow my inn is paused. > when I say > # ctlinnd go > It replies "usage ctlinnd go reason" > # ctlinnd go because I want you to and I am root goddammit > Reply: wrong reason > > How do I start the stubborn bastard? I haven't run inn in quite a while, but I recall that whenever you pause (or throttle) inn, you specify a 'reason' string. It wants you to re-enter that reason to restart the server. It may be logged somewhere, though. -- Jon Parise (parise@pobox.com) . Rochester Inst. of Technology http://www.pobox.com/~parise/ : Computer Science House Member To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 9:52:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from web.net (web.net [192.139.37.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AF1714FF0 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 09:51:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rob@rail.web.net) Received: from rail.web.net([192.139.37.202]) (1198 bytes) by web.net via sendmail with P:smtp/R:bind_hosts/T:inet_zone_bind_smtp (sender: ) id for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 12:51:17 -0400 (EDT) (Smail-3.2.0.107 1999-Sep-8 #2 built 1999-Sep-15) Received: by rail.web.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9C0B91C02; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 12:51:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 12:51:13 -0400 From: Rob Ellis To: Marius Strom Cc: Leif Neland , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: inn paused Message-ID: <19990917125113.A1655@web.net> Mail-Followup-To: Marius Strom , Leif Neland , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.6i In-Reply-To: ; from Marius Strom on Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 11:08:20AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Run ctlinnd status (I think) and it will give you the reason. 'ctlinnd mode', at least for old INN... - Rob -- Rob Ellis Systems Administrator, Web Networks To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 13:26:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from agora.neteze.com (agora.neteze.com [208.201.249.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3D214DFB for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 13:26:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kc@neteze.com) Received: from admin1 ([208.201.249.51]) by agora.neteze.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-60395U6000L600S0V35) with SMTP id com for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 13:29:49 -0700 Message-ID: <139b01bf014b$41084820$33f9c9d0@neteze.com> From: "Kelsey Cummings" To: Subject: apache .htaccess problems (not really fbsd problem) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 13:28:51 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I've had some curious problems with apache's .htaccess. A directory "/test" contains an .htaccess which is configured so as to require a valid user. This works as expected. However, when accessing a subdirectory "/test/user" it must reauthenticate. This happens on a number of different computers/browsers/os's so I'm sure its the server and not something in the browser. I'm running 3.2-release with apache 1.3.6 from the ports tree. TIA. The .htaccess is: AuthName "UserNameTheory" AuthType Basic AuthUserFile /home/kgc/www/.htpasswd-test AuthGroupFile /dev/null DirectoryIndex test.cgi require validuser ----------------------------------------------------------------- Kelsey Cummings System Administrator NetEase, Inc. kc@neteze.com ----------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 13:45:26 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from Astrovan.cstone.net (mailstop.cstone.net [205.197.102.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F091E1533E for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 13:44:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from highway@cstone.net) Received: from fieldeng (fieldeng.cstone.net [209.145.66.12]) by Astrovan.cstone.net (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59789U13500L1350S0V35) with SMTP id net; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 16:41:24 -0400 Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19990917164231.02d1e180@cstone.net> X-Sender: highway@cstone.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.6 (32) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 16:42:31 -0400 To: "Kelsey Cummings" From: Sean Michael Whipkey Subject: Re: apache .htaccess problems (not really fbsd problem) Cc: In-Reply-To: <139b01bf014b$41084820$33f9c9d0@neteze.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Running FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE with Apache 1.3.3, we don't always see the same problem. For example, in my personal directory, my password protected directories have their subdirectories protected, but you don't have to re-authenticate. Here's my .htaccess file: AuthType Basic AuthName "Cornerstone GWAR" AuthDBMUserFile /www/users/highway/gwar/passwd require valid-user HTH, SeanMike -- SeanMike Whipkey - Cornerstone Networks Engineering - highway@cstone.net Report received spam to: spam-report@cstone.net with the full headers Cornerstone Networks - 804.817.7000 or 800.325.9848 - http://www.cstone.net "Paratroopers are not an oppressed minority" - David Drake To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 14: 5:54 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from arnold.neland.dk (mail.neland.dk [194.255.12.232]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4110515518 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:05:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: from gina (gina.neland.dk [192.168.0.14]) by arnold.neland.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA54254 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 23:07:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Message-ID: <00ef01bf0150$9b4ba2a0$0e00a8c0@neland.dk> From: "Leif Neland" Cc: References: <19990917120951.A30587@osfmail.isc.rit.edu> Subject: Sv: inn paused Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 23:07:09 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 05:59:17PM +0200, Leif Neland wrote: >=20 > > Somehow my inn is paused. > > when I say=20 > > # ctlinnd go=20 > > It replies "usage ctlinnd go reason" > > # ctlinnd go because I want you to and I am root goddammit > > Reply: wrong reason > >=20 > > How do I start the stubborn bastard? Thanks all; now it runs again. Next question: How do I make big brother = show yellow, when the server is paused? Oops, not this list... And how = to show incoming and current number of messages in mrtg? Oops, not this = either :-) Leif =20 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 14: 6:38 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from dns02.arpa-canada.net (dns02.arpa-canada.net [209.104.118.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32DB214E03 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:06:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from matt@MLINK.NET) Received: (qmail 7486 invoked by uid 1000); 17 Sep 1999 21:06:34 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 17 Sep 1999 21:06:34 -0000 Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 17:06:34 -0400 (EDT) From: matt X-Sender: matt@dns02.arpa-canada.net To: FreeBSD-ISP Subject: bandwidth limiting users. Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This may be an inappropriate list, but it is a kind of an ISP related question, that said... Is there a fairly painfree way to limit how much bandwidth a webhosted user can eat up? At the price of bandwidth nowadays, a few megs per second just cannot be handed over to one user.. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 14: 9:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from buffnet4.buffnet.net (buffnet4.buffnet.net [205.246.19.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD06E1540B for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:09:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shovey@buffnet.net) Received: from buffnet11.buffnet.net (buffnet11.buffnet.net [205.246.19.55]) by buffnet4.buffnet.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA13994; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 17:09:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from shovey@buffnet.net) Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 17:09:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Steve Hovey To: matt Cc: FreeBSD-ISP Subject: Re: bandwidth limiting users. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org We just charge them when they go over a certain point per month. On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, matt wrote: > > This may be an inappropriate list, but it is a kind of an ISP related > question, that said... Is there a fairly painfree way to limit how much > bandwidth a webhosted user can eat up? At the price of bandwidth nowadays, > a few megs per second just cannot be handed over to one user.. > > -Matt > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 14:14:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from agora.neteze.com (agora.neteze.com [208.201.249.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22FC214F6E for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:14:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kc@neteze.com) Received: from admin1 ([208.201.249.51]) by agora.neteze.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-60395U6000L600S0V35) with SMTP id com; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:18:51 -0700 Message-ID: <14b301bf0152$1a5223c0$33f9c9d0@neteze.com> From: "Kelsey Cummings" To: "matt" , "FreeBSD-ISP" References: Subject: Re: bandwidth limiting users. Date: Fri, 17 Sep 1999 14:17:52 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org We used Luigi's dummnet code with IPFW & bridging to limit some office's in the same building with us that we gave service via ethernet. It works very well. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Kelsey Cummings System Administrator NetEase, Inc. kc@neteze.com ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: matt To: FreeBSD-ISP Sent: Friday, September 17, 1999 2:06 PM Subject: bandwidth limiting users. > > This may be an inappropriate list, but it is a kind of an ISP related > question, that said... Is there a fairly painfree way to limit how much > bandwidth a webhosted user can eat up? At the price of bandwidth nowadays, > a few megs per second just cannot be handed over to one user.. > > -Matt > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Sep 17 22:39:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from granite.sentex.net (granite.sentex.ca [199.212.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267FA15422 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 1999 22:39:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from ospf-mdt.sentex.net (ospf-mdt.sentex.net [205.211.164.81]) by granite.sentex.net (8.8.8/8.6.9) with SMTP id BAA09409; Sat, 18 Sep 1999 01:39:09 -0400 (EDT) From: mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa) To: pryker@skynetweb.com (Phillip Ryker) Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tape Drive Insanity!! Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 05:52:11 GMT Message-ID: <37e327c8.185315900@mail.sentex.net> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent .99e/32.227 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >I read through the handbook and I did exactly what it asks. I did a: > > mt fsf 1 > >And I got the following error: > > mt: /dev/nrsa0: fsf: Input/output error If there is nothing on the tape, you will get that error. > >And the /var/log/messages reports: > > Sep 17 14:38:06 ns5 /kernel: (sa0:ahc0:0:4:0): SPACE. CDB: 11 1 >0 >0 1 0 >Sep 17 14:38:06 ns5 /kernel: (sa0:ahc0:0:4:0): BLANK CHECK req sz: 1 >(decimal) asc:0,5 >Sep 17 14:38:06 ns5 /kernel: (sa0:ahc0:0:4:0): End-of-data detected > >ALso, when I try to run a dump as follows: > > dump -0u /etc Is /etc really on a separate partition ? try instead to dump a partition ---Mike ---Mike Mike Tancsa (mdtancsa@sentex.net) Sentex Communications Corp, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada "Given enough time, 100 monkeys on 100 routers could setup a national IP network." (KDW2) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Sep 18 2: 8:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from dominik.saargate.de (dominik.saargate.de [212.88.132.246]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB0614EDD for ; Sat, 18 Sep 1999 02:08:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from domi@saargate.de) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dominik.saargate.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA82888; Sat, 18 Sep 1999 08:39:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from domi@saargate.de) Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 08:39:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Dominik Brettnacher To: "matt@MLINK.NET" Cc: isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bandwidth limiting users. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, matt@MLINK.NET wrote: > This may be an inappropriate list, but it is a kind of an ISP related > question, that said... Is there a fairly painfree way to limit how much > bandwidth a webhosted user can eat up? At the price of bandwidth nowadays, > a few megs per second just cannot be handed over to one user.. How about mod_bandwidth.c for Apache. -- Dominik - http://www.saargate.de/~domi/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Sep 18 3:17:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.free.fr (smtp2.free.fr [212.27.32.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6223114C28 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 1999 03:17:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from m.hallgren@free.fr) Received: from roam (paris11-48-152.dial.proxad.net [212.27.48.152]) by smtp2.free.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with SMTP id MAA11307; Sat, 18 Sep 1999 12:16:43 +0200 Message-ID: <006801bf01be$c3a44540$b8014b0a@fisystem.fr> From: "Michael Hallgren" To: "Andy V. Oleynik" , References: <37E228A7.7988D12F@prime.net.ua> Subject: Re: slightly offtopic: Tier 1 ISP in Europe? Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 12:15:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Teleglobe. mh > Hi, folks, > who can point whois Tier 1 ISP in Europe? > > -- > WBW Andy V. Oleynik (When U work in virtual office > prime.net.ua's U have good chance to obtain > system administrator virtual money ö%-) > +380442448363 > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Sep 18 9:59:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from infoseek.com (corp-bbn.infoseek.com [204.162.96.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F8214D32 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 1999 09:59:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cshaver@infoseek.com) Received: from maude.infoseek.com (maude [198.5.210.38]) by infoseek.com (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id JAA28436; Sat, 18 Sep 1999 09:59:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from infoseek.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maude.infoseek.com (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id JAA23502; Sat, 18 Sep 1999 09:59:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <37E3C4DA.3220E5DA@infoseek.com> Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 09:59:06 -0700 From: "Craig W. Shaver" Organization: InfoSeek Corporation, Santa Clara, CA X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.6 sun4u) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Tape Drive Insanity!! References: <37e327c8.185315900@mail.sentex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org What blocking size are you using? I have had trouble with tar tapes that I used one blocking size to write and then tried to read them with another (default) blocking size. I thought the tape was bad until I gave it the -b 'size' for the original tape write. Mike Tancsa wrote: > > >I read through the handbook and I did exactly what it asks. I did a: > > > > mt fsf 1 > > > >And I got the following error: > > > > mt: /dev/nrsa0: fsf: Input/output error > > If there is nothing on the tape, you will get that error. > > > > >And the /var/log/messages reports: > > > > Sep 17 14:38:06 ns5 /kernel: (sa0:ahc0:0:4:0): SPACE. CDB: 11 1 > >0 > >0 1 0 > >Sep 17 14:38:06 ns5 /kernel: (sa0:ahc0:0:4:0): BLANK CHECK req sz: 1 > >(decimal) asc:0,5 > >Sep 17 14:38:06 ns5 /kernel: (sa0:ahc0:0:4:0): End-of-data detected > > > >ALso, when I try to run a dump as follows: > > > > dump -0u /etc > > Is /etc really on a separate partition ? > > try instead to dump a partition > -- cshaver@infoseek.com (408)543-6451 Craig Shaver, Productivity Group POB 60458 Sunnyvale, CA 94088 (650)390-0654 http://www.progroup.com/ mailto:craig@progroup.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Sep 18 18:49:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6421C14CAE for ; Sat, 18 Sep 1999 18:49:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from grog@freebie.lemis.com) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) id LAA97963; Sun, 19 Sep 1999 11:19:19 +0930 (CST) Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 11:19:19 +0930 From: Greg Lehey To: Martti Kuparinen Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Adding a new disk to vinum Message-ID: <19990919111919.W55065@freebie.lemis.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: ; from Martti Kuparinen on Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 10:12:24AM +0300 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog X-PGP-Fingerprint: 6B 7B C3 8C 61 CD 54 AF 13 24 52 F8 6D A4 95 EF Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Friday, 17 September 1999 at 10:12:24 +0300, Martti Kuparinen wrote: > Hi! > > I'm building a server based on FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE and I thought > I'd use vinum for /var/spool/imap (for Cyrus IMAP server) to > create a large filesystem (say 3x9 GB as a single fs -- i.e. to > use concat). > > But what if I have to add a new disk, must I run newfs for > the whole vinum thing (=backup the old stuff first) or can I > just expand the existing configuration to include also the new disk? There are some programs in development which will do this, but they're not ready yet. Yes, you'll have to newfs. > What other alternatives do I have (besides HW solutions)? None, including hardware solutions. You'll still have to newfs. It's a file system issue, not a storage device issue. Greg -- See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message