From owner-freebsd-net Sun Oct 17 2:21:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rdc1.ct.home.com (ha1.rdc1.ct.home.com [24.2.0.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DFB14CE9 for ; Sun, 17 Oct 1999 02:21:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rosteen@elpn.com) Received: from elpn.com ([24.2.228.245]) by mail.rdc1.ct.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.07 201-229-111-110) with ESMTP id <19991017110342.ILRE3646.mail.rdc1.ct.home.com@elpn.com> for ; Sun, 17 Oct 1999 04:03:42 -0700 Message-ID: <380993ED.D8334DB9@elpn.com> Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 05:16:29 -0400 From: ROsteen Organization: @Home Network X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en]C-AtHome0404 (Win95; U) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: ATM interface;need drivers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Can anyone point me in the right direction to attain necessary drivers for a Fore Systems ATM interface? Thanks for any help, Rick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun Oct 17 9: 8: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650DB14DAF for ; Sun, 17 Oct 1999 09:08:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA46454; Sun, 17 Oct 1999 12:07:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 12:07:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199910171607.MAA46454@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: jonathan michaels Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ethernet switch type and freebsd (Re: can two fast ethernet cards work in a freebsd box ?) In-Reply-To: <19991017163640.B24189@caamora.com.au> References: <199910161104.TAA26753@eembox.ee.ncku.edu.tw> <19991017090323.A23931@caamora.com.au> <38094456.B210ECEC@softweyr.com> <19991017163640.B24189@caamora.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org < said: > i've heard a reasonable amount of chatter, when its been > raised, about switch "layer N". This refers to layers in the new-irrelevant-but-still-popular OSI Reference Model. Layer 1 is physical, layer 2 is link, layer 3 is network, and so on up to 7 (application). In the Internet reference model, the layers are subnetwork, internet, transport, and application -- this cuts out the useless OSI session and presentation layers. (Shows what happens when your network is designed by smart people who actually build things as opposed to a committee.) Historically, a packet switch operating at the subnetwork (OSI link) layer was called a ``bridge'', and one operating at the internet (OSI network) layer was called a ``gateway'' or more recently ``router''. About eight years ago, the term ``switch'' was revived, to refer to bridge architectures in which packet forwarding was implemented in hardware, analogous to ATM's cell switches, and more specifically such designs where the internal interconnection fabric had enough capacity to handle all bridge ports operating at full line rate simultaneously. More recently, numerous vendors have developed hardware router architectures with analogous behavior. It thus became natural to describe these routers as ``layer-3 switches'', as compared to bridging ``layer-2 switches'' -- and in fact most of the former also implement the latter. Finally, a whole new evilness has been visited on unsuspecting humanity by the appearance of so-called ``layer-4 switches''. Depending on which vendor you talk to, this may mean different things -- the classic example of what Debbie Deutsch of Lucent calls a ``marketechture''. To some vendors, a ``layer-4 switch'' is simply a layer-3 switch which can look at transport headers to provide Quality of Service functionality or packet filtering. To other vendors, a ``layer-4 switch'' is a specific kind of NAT kluge used for load-balancing across Web servers. All of these names principally serve the purpose of the vendors' marketing departments. I prefer to use terms like ``bridge'' and ``router'' if I am referring to a specific type of packet switch, and reserve the term ``switch'' for the generic. But then again, I'm lucky enough to work in a place where I can call something a ``gateway'' and still be understood.... > specifically, is thier support in freebsd fro different switch > 'layers' Yes and no. FreeBSD can act as a router (layer 3) or as a bridge (layer 2), but the machines on which FreeBSD runs on typically do not have hardware forwarding support or a sufficiently beefy bus architecture to back it up. On the other hand, there are several vendors who will sell you a switch which happens to run FreeBSD on its management processor, like Juniper. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun Oct 17 23:26:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from sentry.granch.ru (sentry.granch.ru [212.20.5.135]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A90D11501F for ; Sun, 17 Oct 1999 23:26:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from shelton@sentry.granch.ru) Received: (from shelton@localhost) by sentry.granch.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA10868 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 13:26:17 +0700 (NOVST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 13:26:17 +0700 (NOVST) Organization: Granch Ltd. From: "Rashid N. Achilov" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: FW: what is that Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Strange messages like"kernel: arp: xxx.yyy.zzz.aaa is on if1, but got reply from aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff on if0" about many addresses in local network. FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE --- With Best Regards. Rashid N. Achilov (RNA1-RIPE), Cert. ID: 28514, Granch Ltd. lead engineer e-mail: achilov@granch.ru, tel (383-2) 24-2363 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Oct 18 10:15:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (picasso.transbay.net [209.133.53.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BAC914BDB; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 10:15:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA00830; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 10:07:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199910181707.KAA00830@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Mohit Aron Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, tech-net@netbsd.org Subject: Re: sbappend() is not scalable In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 08 Oct 1999 15:51:29 CDT." <199910082051.PAA25028@cs.rice.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 10:07:41 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > The problem is not limited only to high b/w networks - it is also present in > long latency paths (satellite links). Thus a server transferring a large file > over a satellite link can spend lot of CPU due to the above problem. > > Hope the problem shall be fixed in future releases, Have you had a chance to look at Alfred Perlstein's patches for this? -- \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\ Mike Smith \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself, \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Oct 18 17:12:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from etri.re.kr (mail.etri.re.kr [129.254.113.113]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B991542E for ; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 17:12:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kimch@etri.re.kr) Received: from etri.re.kr (kimch.etri.re.kr [129.254.191.142]) by etri.re.kr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA06721 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 09:10:13 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <380BB7CA.1A213F5C@etri.re.kr> Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 09:14:02 +0900 From: Changhoon Kim X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Net Subject: [Q] NHRP implementation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=EUC-KR Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, folks. Have someone already found NHRP(Next-Hop Resolution Protocol) implementation working with FreeBSD ATM ? Thanks. -- ========================================================== Changhoon Kim Internet Technology Research Dept. Switching & Transmission Technology Lab. Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute(ETRI) 161 Kajong-dong, Yusong-gu, Taejon, 305-350, KOREA Tel: (Office) +82-42-860-5801, (Cell) +82-19-226-6305 E-mail: kimch@etri.re.kr * All Smiles, Everywhere and Everytime ! =========================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Oct 18 19: 5: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mail.prophetnetworks.net (mail.prophetnetworks.net [63.71.252.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878C61580E; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 19:04:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bvaughn@prophetnetworks.net) Received: from shell01.prophetnetworks.net (bvaughn@shell01.prophetnetworks.net [63.71.252.10]) by mail.prophetnetworks.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA22267; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 21:04:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bvaughn@prophetnetworks.net) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 21:04:50 -0500 (EST) From: Ben Vaughn To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: NIS and weird res_mkquery messages.. (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 15:55:38 -0500 (EST) From: Ben Vaughn To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: NIS and weird res_mkquery messages.. Hey all, I am getting some weird errors in syslog on my NIS master server (this is new in the last 24 hours) and I was wondering if anyone has ever seen it and could give me some insight on whats up...thanks! Oct 18 15:13:20 xxx ypserv[108]: res_mkquery failed Oct 18 15:14:00 xxx last message repeated 4 times Oct 18 15:16:10 xxx last message repeated 13 times Oct 18 15:26:11 xxx last message repeated 60 times Oct 18 15:36:03 xxx last message repeated 59 times -biv ---- Ben Vaughn Prophet Network Systems bvaughn@prophetnetworks.net ---- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Oct 19 2:26:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mail.bsb.nutecnet.com.br (mail.bsb.nutecnet.com.br [200.252.253.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29D31643E for ; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 02:26:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from visi0n@aux-tech.org) Received: from variola.chinatown.org (dl7205-bsb.bsb.nutecnet.com.br [200.252.208.205]) by mail.bsb.nutecnet.com.br (8.8.5/SCA-6.6) with SMTP id SAA07822 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 1999 18:26:11 -0300 (BRA) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 07:28:35 +0000 ( ) From: visi0n X-Sender: visi0n@variola.chinatown.org To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: fxp driver Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I would like to know what is the first function which will be called in the init process and what function call for her. Im trying to understand the network init process using the if_fxp.c driver. =============================================================================== visi0n AUX TECHNOLOGIES www.aux-tech.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Oct 19 2:50:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from arthur.axion.bt.co.uk (arthur.axion.bt.co.uk [132.146.5.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FBC16540 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 02:50:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from graeme.n.brown@bt.com) Received: from cbtlipnt02.btlabs.bt.co.uk by arthur (local) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 10:50:23 +0100 Received: by cbtlipnt02.btlabs.bt.co.uk with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) id ; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 10:50:13 +0100 Message-ID: <71DA16F18D32D2119A1D0000F8FE9A9402B5A313@mbtlipnt01.btlabs.bt.co.uk> From: graeme.n.brown@bt.com To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Source Code for OSPFv2 ? Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 10:50:17 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Does anyone know of a source-code release of OSPFv2 for FreeBSD (or *BSD Unix) apart from the GateD implementation ? TIA Graeme N Brown BT Adastral Park, UK email: graeme.n.brown@bt.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Oct 19 10:10:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from picalon.gun.de (picalon.gun.de [192.109.159.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0721772E for ; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 10:10:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: from klemm.gtn.com (pppak04.gtn.com [194.231.123.169]) by picalon.gun.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA21294; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 19:10:24 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA36049; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 19:05:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 19:05:16 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: graeme.n.brown@bt.com Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Source Code for OSPFv2 ? Message-ID: <19991019190515.A32285@titan.klemm.gtn.com> References: <71DA16F18D32D2119A1D0000F8FE9A9402B5A313@mbtlipnt01.btlabs.bt.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre1i In-Reply-To: <71DA16F18D32D2119A1D0000F8FE9A9402B5A313@mbtlipnt01.btlabs.bt.co.uk> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE SMP X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 10:50:17AM +0100, graeme.n.brown@bt.com wrote: > Hi > > Does anyone know of a source-code release of OSPFv2 for FreeBSD (or *BSD > Unix) > apart from the GateD implementation ? You could try zebra port which doesn RIP, OSPF, BGP4 It's still in developement but possibly already useable. -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas http://www.freebsd.org/~fsmp/SMP/SMP.html powered by Symmetric MultiProcessor FreeBSD Get new songs from our band: http://www.freebsd.org/~andreas/64bits/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Oct 19 14:14:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from oracle.dsuper.net (oracle.dsuper.net [205.205.255.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE7E17D12 for ; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 14:14:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmilekic@dsuper.net) Received: from oracle.dsuper.net (oracle.dsuper.net [205.205.255.1]) by oracle.dsuper.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA06159; Tue, 19 Oct 1999 17:14:16 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 17:14:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Bosko Milekic To: visi0n Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fxp driver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 19 Oct 1999, visi0n wrote: !> !> Hi, I would like to know what is the first function which will be !>called in the init process and what function call for her. Im trying to !>understand the network init process using the if_fxp.c driver. !> !>=============================================================================== !>visi0n !>AUX TECHNOLOGIES !>www.aux-tech.org !> The probe routine is called first, then the attach routine. See sys/i386/i386/autoconf.c 's configure() -- along with sys/pci/pci* -- Bosko Milekic .. [ http://www.technokratis.com/ ] .. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Oct 20 12:41: 1 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from proxy4.ba.best.com (proxy4.ba.best.com [206.184.139.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4A514CF9; Wed, 20 Oct 1999 12:40:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ssamalin@ionet.net) Received: from ionet.net (sam.ops.best.com [205.149.163.53]) by proxy4.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.out) with ESMTP id MAA21162; Wed, 20 Oct 1999 12:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <380E19B5.71C5BE39@ionet.net> Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 15:36:21 -0400 From: Sam Samalin X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp , freebsd-ipf , freebsd-security , freebsd-net Subject: ipfw not alias to bind Class C to interface? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Has anyone done this? What are the pros/cons? We want to use ipfw instead of aliases with all our internet servers to bind Class Cs. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Oct 20 19: 1:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (law-f170.hotmail.com [209.185.131.233]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8846914E25 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 1999 19:01:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from skalir@hotmail.com) Received: (qmail 91002 invoked by uid 0); 21 Oct 1999 02:01:31 -0000 Message-ID: <19991021020131.91001.qmail@hotmail.com> Received: from 207.66.87.245 by www.hotmail.com with HTTP; Wed, 20 Oct 1999 19:01:30 PDT X-Originating-IP: [207.66.87.245] From: "skalir scalar" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Linksys PCMCIA Ethernet card Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 18:01:30 AKDT Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Will my Linksys PCMCIA Ethernet card work in FreeBSD? If not, What is a good BSD like or linux OS to use for it? Thankx. ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Oct 20 20:45:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from bingsun2.cc.binghamton.edu (bingsun2.cc.binghamton.edu [128.226.6.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815C114E79 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 1999 20:45:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bg24484@binghamton.edu) Received: from localhost (bg24484@localhost) by bingsun2.cc.binghamton.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA14389 for ; Wed, 20 Oct 1999 23:45:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: bingsun2.cc.binghamton.edu: bg24484 owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 23:45:29 -0400 (EDT) From: X-Sender: bg24484@bingsun2 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Custom Compilation of Kernel Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I went through the Free BSD hand book for custom compilation of the kernel and things worked fine. However is there a way to do the same by making a copy of the entire kernel source in my private directory. I couldnt move beyond executing the command : config kernel. I dont want to modify the kernel source in its current directory and would like to have my version of the kernel in my private directory. Any help would be appreciated. -Roshan. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Oct 20 22:46:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from jaguar.ir.miami.edu (jaguar.ir.miami.edu [129.171.32.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C9614C43; Wed, 20 Oct 1999 22:46:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@miami.edu) Received: from jaguar.ir.miami.edu ("port 3115"@jaguar.ir.miami.edu [129.171.32.10]) by jaguar.ir.miami.edu (PMDF V5.2-32 #40232) with ESMTP id <0FJX00CJLUP5KH@jaguar.ir.miami.edu>; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 01:46:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 01:46:17 -0400 (EDT) From: "Joe \"Marcus\" Clarke" Subject: Re: Linksys PCMCIA Ethernet card In-reply-to: <19991021020131.91001.qmail@hotmail.com> To: skalir scalar Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I use a LinkSys 10/100 EtherFast card, and it works fine. I, or course am using the PAO distribution with FreeBSD 3.3 RELEASE. PAO can be downloaded from http://www.jp.freebsd.org/PAO, and it's really easy to install. Joe Clarke On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, skalir scalar wrote: > Will my Linksys PCMCIA Ethernet card work in FreeBSD? If not, What > is a good BSD like or linux OS to use for it? > > Thankx. > > ______________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Oct 21 1:56:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from eembox.ee.ncku.edu.tw (eembox.ee.ncku.edu.tw [140.116.72.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C5314EDA for ; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 01:55:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ckwen@eembox.ee.ncku.edu.tw) Received: (from ckwen@localhost) by eembox.ee.ncku.edu.tw (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id QAA15781 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 16:49:59 +0800 (CST) From: ckwen Message-Id: <199910210849.QAA15781@eembox.ee.ncku.edu.tw> Subject: Re: can two fast ethernet cards work in a freebsd box ? To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 16:49:58 +0800 (CST) In-Reply-To: <38094456.B210ECEC@softweyr.com> from "Wes Peters" at Oct 16, 99 09:36:54 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > > > > Now the hub's 100 Mbps LED goes on again after the execution > > > > of ifconfig command. The parameters I set in ifconfig are > > > > "media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex." After few days observation, I would like to share the results with all of you. Due to my misunderstanding, I set the hub to operate in full duplex mode. It is true that the hub(Dlink DFE-904) and ethernet card work without trouble. But something happened to the data rate on the link. Data rate with half duplex is around 7%~10% higher than the data rate with full duplex. So now I set correct parameters to "media 100baseTX mediaopt half-duplex." Cheng-Kang Wen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Oct 21 3:24:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from nplex1.imap4.com (nplex1.imap4.com [198.6.228.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC2B14E3F for ; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 03:24:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from suchi@imap4.com) Received: from webexpress (198.6.228.248) by nplex1.imap4.com (NPlex 4.0.058) id 3807BA31000008AD for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 03:25:06 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 03:30:59 -0800 From: suchi@imap4.com Message-Id: <940501859.webexpressdV2.1.3@nplex1.imap4.com> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Subscribe Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org subscribe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Oct 21 8:32:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from over.ru (over.rinet.ru [195.54.192.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66B3E14C59 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 08:32:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tarkhil@over.ru) Received: (qmail 86425 invoked by uid 1000); 21 Oct 1999 15:32:16 -0000 Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 19:32:16 +0400 From: Alex Povolotsky To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: SIOCGIFCONF (or qmail?) problem? Message-ID: <19991021193216.D86089@over.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello! I've just found, that bringing up ppp0 on a computer with one more network interface causes qmail-1.03 to crash. Investigating further, I've found that one of qmail's internal variables gets overwriten when calling ioctl SIOCGIFCONF with pointer to ifconf structure as argument (ipme.c, line 57 in qmail). I still have not found if qmail gives wrong address to ioctl or if ioctl use more memory than requested. The fail seems to occur after iterating through ds0 interface. By the way, what is ds0, how it should be configured, and where is it described? What does it do? Does anyone else runs FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE with qmail and dial-in access? Alex. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Oct 21 9:47: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from xylan.com (postal.xylan.com [208.8.0.248]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026FA14F2C; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 09:46:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from mailhub.xylan.com by xylan.com (8.8.7/SMI-SVR4 (ind.alcatel.com 2.3 [OUT])) id JAA18286; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 09:46:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from omni.xylan.com by mailhub.xylan.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4 (mailhub 2.1 [HUB])) id JAA09253; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 09:46:53 -0700 Received: from softweyr.com (picasso.transbay.net) by omni.xylan.com (4.1/SMI-4.1 (xylan engr [SPOOL])) id AA05180; Thu, 21 Oct 99 09:46:45 PDT Message-Id: <380F4376.F1C0E16C@softweyr.com> Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 10:46:46 -0600 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: skalir scalar Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linksys PCMCIA Ethernet card References: <19991021020131.91001.qmail@hotmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org skalir scalar wrote: > > Will my Linksys PCMCIA Ethernet card work in FreeBSD? If not, What > is a good BSD like or linux OS to use for it? Yes, it should work fine. Mine does. If not, just get a good, cheap NE-2000 clone. Switching operating systems for the sake of an ethernet card seems kind of backwards, especially for a $40 card. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC wes@softweyr.com http://softweyr.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Oct 21 10:49:46 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from over.ru (over.rinet.ru [195.54.192.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F2C114CFB for ; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 10:49:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tarkhil@over.ru) Received: (qmail 90367 invoked by uid 1000); 21 Oct 1999 17:49:13 -0000 Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 21:49:13 +0400 From: Alex Povolotsky To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SIOCGIFCONF (or qmail?) problem? Message-ID: <19991021214913.A90292@over.ru> References: <19991021193216.D86089@over.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <19991021193216.D86089@over.ru> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 07:32:16PM +0400, Alex Povolotsky wrote: > Investigating further, I've found that one of qmail's internal variables > gets overwriten when calling ioctl SIOCGIFCONF with pointer to ifconf > structure as argument (ipme.c, line 57 in qmail). > > I still have not found if qmail gives wrong address to ioctl or if ioctl use > more memory than requested. The fail seems to occur after iterating through Well, one step forth, if anyone is interested. given 420 bytes of buffer before ioctl(s,SIOCGIFCONF,&ifc), ioctl uses 1024 and sets ifc.ifc_len to 1024. I am not kernel-hacker enough to understand what's happening in /sys/net/if.c between lines 820 and 877, and, people, it's 9:50 PM here in Moscow! Can someone help? Alex. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Oct 21 11:29:39 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from ausmail1.austin.ibm.com (ausmail1.austin.ibm.com [192.35.232.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C88114F90 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 11:29:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marquard@austin.ibm.com) Received: from netmail3.austin.ibm.com (netmail3.austin.ibm.com [9.53.250.99]) by ausmail1.austin.ibm.com (8.9.1/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA25276 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 13:27:32 -0500 Received: from mojave.austin.ibm.com (mojave.austin.ibm.com [9.53.150.76]) by netmail3.austin.ibm.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA45564 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 13:29:23 -0500 Received: (from marquard@localhost) by mojave.austin.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3/8.7-client1.01) id NAA32948; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 13:29:23 -0500 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SIOCGIFCONF (or qmail?) problem? References: <19991021193216.D86089@over.ru> From: Dave Marquardt Date: 21 Oct 1999 13:29:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: Alex Povolotsky's message of "Thu, 21 Oct 1999 19:32:16 +0400" Message-ID: Lines: 8 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 21.1 - "20 Minutes to Nikko" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Alex Povolotsky writes: > By the way, what is ds0, how it should be configured, and where is it > described? What does it do? ds0 is the discard interface. It's mostly for testing. If you don't need, take it out of your kernel configuration. -Dave To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Oct 21 13: 9:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from picalon.gun.de (picalon.gun.de [192.109.159.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC43314DB7 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 13:09:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: from klemm.gtn.com (pppak04.gtn.com [194.231.123.169]) by picalon.gun.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA29732 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 22:09:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA42599 for net@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 22:09:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 22:09:11 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: fbsd 3.3: NFS/AMD trouble amd[157]: /host/titan: unmount: input/output error Message-ID: <19991021220911.A42325@titan.klemm.gtn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE SMP X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi ! Am trying to copy a large file to a server filesystem, which is mounted via NFS (automounter/amd). Both systems: FreeBSD-3.3-STABLE I use NFS version 3 since the volume on titan is > 2 GB .. andreas@laptop$ cp 12MBtarball.tgz /host/titan/home/andreas/freebsd/packages As soon as I copy the huge file via NFS, the Xircom network card seems to hang, since I can't ping laptop from titan. If I remove and resinsert the Xircom PCMCIA card, then it initializes fine again, and laptop is pingable. But as soon as I start another copy, it hangs ... Reading large files isn't a problem .... CVSROOT is remote on titan. And I use the distfiles on titan. Bulding x11 isn't a problem (so to say extracting large sources over NFS)... Any ideas ? Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas http://www.freebsd.org/~fsmp/SMP/SMP.html powered by Symmetric MultiProcessor FreeBSD Get new songs from our band: http://www.freebsd.org/~andreas/64bits/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Oct 21 13:13:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from picalon.gun.de (picalon.gun.de [192.109.159.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C08514F55 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 13:13:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: from klemm.gtn.com (pppak04.gtn.com [194.231.123.169]) by picalon.gun.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA29977 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 22:13:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA42936 for net@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 22:13:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 22:13:44 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fbsd 3.3: NFS/AMD trouble amd[157]: /host/titan: unmount: input/output error Message-ID: <19991021221344.A42685@titan.klemm.gtn.com> References: <19991021220911.A42325@titan.klemm.gtn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre1i In-Reply-To: <19991021220911.A42325@titan.klemm.gtn.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE SMP X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org BTW, sending large files via ftp isn't a problem. Want to say, it isn't generelly a "sending huge traffic" problem.... root@titan{1140} $ netstat -I xl0 1 input (xl0) output packets errs bytes packets errs bytes colls 1 0 78 1 0 98 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 618 0 928012 301 0 19970 140 700 0 1058368 339 0 22374 153 523 0 791822 250 0 16500 176 527 0 794996 256 0 16944 91 527 0 796438 254 0 16764 175 509 0 770626 245 0 16170 123 534 0 806962 257 0 16962 134 438 0 663132 212 0 13992 127 547 0 826722 262 0 17324 126 544 0 820416 260 0 17160 131 537 0 809562 259 0 17094 120 511 0 771398 245 0 16170 115 531 0 802510 256 0 16920 120 532 0 801138 257 0 17010 144 558 0 842396 269 0 17754 140 499 0 755486 244 0 16104 116 536 0 809990 259 0 17094 141 BTW, layer 1 is: Laptop -> Xircom 10/100 -> Cat 5 cable -> Cisco 2516 (with integrated hub) <- cat5 cable <- 3c905b <- PPro 200 -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas http://www.freebsd.org/~fsmp/SMP/SMP.html powered by Symmetric MultiProcessor FreeBSD Get new songs from our band: http://www.freebsd.org/~andreas/64bits/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Oct 22 11: 3:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from bubba.whistle.com (bubba.whistle.com [207.76.205.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFB014C42; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 11:03:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from archie@whistle.com) Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id LAA67886; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 11:03:42 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <199910221803.LAA67886@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: SIOCGIFCONF (or qmail?) problem? In-Reply-To: <19991021193216.D86089@over.ru> from Alex Povolotsky at "Oct 21, 1999 07:32:16 pm" To: tarkhil@over.ru (Alex Povolotsky) Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 11:03:42 -0700 (PDT) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Alex Povolotsky writes: > I've just found, that bringing up ppp0 on a computer with one more network > interface causes qmail-1.03 to crash. > > Investigating further, I've found that one of qmail's internal variables > gets overwriten when calling ioctl SIOCGIFCONF with pointer to ifconf > structure as argument (ipme.c, line 57 in qmail). > > I still have not found if qmail gives wrong address to ioctl or if ioctl use > more memory than requested. The fail seems to occur after iterating through > ds0 interface. > > By the way, what is ds0, how it should be configured, and where is it > described? What does it do? > > Does anyone else runs FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE with qmail and dial-in access? This may or may not be the problem, but there is a common bug in programs that use SIOCGIFCONF. The proper way to compute the byte increment to the next entry is: ifp = (struct ifreq *) ((char *) &ifp->ifr_addr + MAX(ifp->ifr_addr.sa_len, sizeof(ifp->ifr_addr)))) The WRONG way to do it is: ifp = (struct ifreq *) ((char *) &ifp->ifr_addr + ifp->ifr_addr.sa_len)) This bug usually only gets triggered when there are discard, tunnel, etc. interfaces which have no link information. You might plow through the qmail sources and check. -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Oct 22 11:27:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from issrv01.co.shasta.ca.us (209-76-70-20.co.shasta.ca.us [209.76.70.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 97D6614BCE for ; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 11:27:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from djewett@snowcrest.net) Received: from ws2983 ([192.168.21.75]) by issrv01.co.shasta.ca.us; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 11:26:54 -0700 Message-ID: <000701bf1cba$9456bb30$4b15a8c0@co.shasta.ca.us> From: "Derek Jewett" To: Subject: More NFS ignorance... Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 11:23:46 -0700 Organization: Shasta County MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I am running 3.0-R and I need to NFS mount it from a handfull of PC's running NT. So following the man page and some tips, in a hurry I ran the following at the server (FBSD box): nfsd -u -t -n 4 ....and mountd -r I created an exports file (/etc/exports) and entered in my host as a test like so; /usr/home/ftp45/files -alldirs 192.168.21.75 Problem: i am unable to mount this export from anywhere, I even tried mounting it from the BSD box itself, and it just hung. I ran the following: nfsiod -n 4 mount bsdserver:/usr/home/ftp45/files /mnt I get a bunch of goofy authentication errors from the NT client machines. Anyone got any ideas as to what I am doing wrong? I looked in the inetd.conf and saw an entry in there for the pcnfsd, but it stated I must be running PORTMAPPER and I found no man page for portmapper.. please help! thanks! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Oct 22 11:32:39 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from pau-amma.whistle.com (pau-amma.whistle.com [207.76.205.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7165E14D02 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 11:32:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dhw@whistle.com) Received: (from dhw@localhost) by pau-amma.whistle.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id LAA09971; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 11:32:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 11:32:02 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <199910221832.LAA09971@pau-amma.whistle.com> To: djewett@snowcrest.net, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More NFS ignorance... In-Reply-To: <000701bf1cba$9456bb30$4b15a8c0@co.shasta.ca.us> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >From: "Derek Jewett" >Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 11:23:46 -0700 >I get a bunch of goofy authentication errors from the NT client machines. >Anyone got any ideas as to what I am doing wrong? I looked in the inetd.conf >and saw an entry in there for the pcnfsd, but it stated I must be running >PORTMAPPER and I found no man page for portmapper.. please help! thanks! "man portmap" Cheers, david -- David Wolfskill dhw@whistle.com UNIX System Administrator voice: (650) 577-7158 pager: (888) 347-0197 FAX: (650) 372-5915 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Oct 22 11:34:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from issrv01.co.shasta.ca.us (209-76-70-20.co.shasta.ca.us [209.76.70.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6356614BCE for ; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 11:34:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from djewett@snowcrest.net) Received: from ws2983 ([192.168.21.75]) by issrv01.co.shasta.ca.us; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 11:34:39 -0700 Message-ID: <000f01bf1cbb$aa04da10$4b15a8c0@co.shasta.ca.us> From: "Derek Jewett" To: Subject: unable to kill process... Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 11:31:32 -0700 Organization: Shasta County MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is most likely not the best place to ask this, but in my excitement with NFS I discovered I am not able to kill the nfsd processes running.. By running top I see three instances of nfsd and I can't kill a one..! Today is just not my day with NFS! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Oct 22 11:35:14 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from Samizdat.uucom.com (samizdat.uucom.com [198.202.217.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2171314F92 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 11:35:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cshenton@uucom.com) Received: (from cshenton@localhost) by Samizdat.uucom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA14620; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 14:35:10 -0400 (EDT) To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: VRRP for FreeBSD (or any open source implementation?) User-Agent: SEMI/1.13.3 (Komaiko) FLIM/1.12.5 (Hirahata) Emacs/20.3 (i386-pc-solaris2.7) MULE/4.0 (HANANOEN) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.13.3 - "Komaiko") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Chris Shenton Date: 22 Oct 1999 14:35:10 -0400 Message-ID: Lines: 11 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I could solve a lot o' problems with firewalls, load balancers, web servers and the like if I had an implementation of VRRP (the IETF spec for Cisco HSRP-like fail-over functionality. A quick web search turns up plenty of hits on the spec itself -- which doesn't seem outrageously complex -- and a list of vendors and interops. But no open source implementation. Any thoughts? Thanks. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Oct 22 11:42:26 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from issrv01.co.shasta.ca.us (209-76-70-20.co.shasta.ca.us [209.76.70.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7ADF414E2A for ; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 11:42:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from djewett@snowcrest.net) Received: from ws2983 ([192.168.21.75]) by issrv01.co.shasta.ca.us; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 11:42:04 -0700 Message-ID: <002201bf1cbc$b33927c0$4b15a8c0@co.shasta.ca.us> From: "Derek Jewett" To: Subject: More NFS ignorance... UPDATE Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 11:38:57 -0700 Organization: Shasta County MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2014.211 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2014.211 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org With portmap running I get a new error! = ..when I run "mount bsdserver:/usr/home/ftp45/files /mnt" I get..... Cannot MNT RPC: RPC:Program not registered the man page for nfsd mentions nothing about RPC and registering anything...???? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Oct 22 13:48: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from Hydro.CAM.ORG (Hydro.CAM.ORG [198.168.100.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BC514C89 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 13:48:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Philippe.Guezou@wanadoo.fr) Received: from sauron.tolkien.cam.org (root@gw-tolkien.TOLKIEN.CAM.ORG [204.19.190.41]) by Hydro.CAM.ORG (8.8.8/8.8.4) with ESMTP id QAA08691; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 16:47:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Philippe.Guezou@wanadoo.fr Received: from uruck (b7RennesFC-1-1-47.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.250.26.47]) by sauron.tolkien.cam.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA08723; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 16:32:38 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from Philippe.Guezou@wanadoo.fr) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19991022225913.007acc50@pop.wanadoo.fr> X-Sender: Philippe.Guezou@pop.wanadoo.fr X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 22:59:13 +0200 To: "Derek Jewett" , Subject: Re: unable to kill process... In-Reply-To: <000f01bf1cbb$aa04da10$4b15a8c0@co.shasta.ca.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 11:31 22/10/99 -0700, Derek Jewett wrote: >This is most likely not the best place to ask this, but in my excitement >with NFS I discovered I am not able to kill the nfsd processes running.. By >running top I see three instances of nfsd and I can't kill a one..! Today is >just not my day with NFS! > kill -9 `ps -ax | grep nfsd | awk '{print $1}'` and, for your problem, look at portmap. You need to run it *before* using nfsd and mountd. man 5 exports should be quite usefull too. fifi... > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Oct 22 17:41:41 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from milkyway.org (lta-r-1.usit.net [205.241.194.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03FF14E44 for ; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 17:41:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from toby@milkyway.org) Received: from milkyway.org (rigel.milkyway.org [205.241.194.19]) by milkyway.org (8.8.8/8.8.3) with ESMTP id UAA04284; Fri, 22 Oct 1999 20:36:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <381106CF.50B91FB7@milkyway.org> Date: Fri, 22 Oct 1999 20:52:31 -0400 From: Toby Swanson X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derek Jewett Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: More NFS ignorance... References: <000701bf1cba$9456bb30$4b15a8c0@co.shasta.ca.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 22 Oct 1999, Derek Jewett wrote: > I am running 3.0-R and I need to NFS mount it from a handfull of PC's > running NT. . . . Are you trying to make files and directories on the FreeBSD box available to your NT boxes? If so, use samba. Toby To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sat Oct 23 19:39:39 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6CB14E14 for ; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 19:39:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA74542; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 22:39:32 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 22:39:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199910240239.WAA74542@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Alex Povolotsky Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: SIOCGIFCONF (or qmail?) problem? In-Reply-To: <19991021193216.D86089@over.ru> References: <19991021193216.D86089@over.ru> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org < said: > By the way, what is ds0, how it should be configured, and where is it > described? What does it do? It is the discard interface. It's used by performance testing code to determine how fast the system can generate packets. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sat Oct 23 21:31:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from doughnut.cc.uq.edu.au (doughnut.cc.uq.edu.au [130.102.128.239]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 731EF14C19; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 21:31:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from T.Jago@its.uq.edu.au) Received: (from tony@localhost) by doughnut.cc.uq.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA12347; Sun, 24 Oct 1999 14:31:04 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from T.Jago@its.uq.edu.au) X-Authentication-Warning: doughnut.cc.uq.edu.au: tony set sender to T.Jago@its.uq.edu.au using -f Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 14:31:03 +1000 (EST) X-Sender: tony@doughnut.cc.uq.edu.au To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, samba@samba.org Subject: Very Poor Samba -> Win9x performance Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII From: Tony Jago Organization: University of Queensland X-Key-Fingerprint: 48 3F 5D FB 37 51 01 C5 A1 82 B1 6B 76 2C 75 9D X-PGP-Key-URL: http://doughnut.cc.uq.edu.au/pub/pgp-keys/T.Jago@its.uq.edu.au X-Direct-Email: tony@scar.uq.edu.au Comments: This mail has be en PGP signed. (http://www.pgp.com/) Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, when transferring a file from a FreeBSD box to a Win9x share using smbclient the performance appears to be very slow (ie. about 10k per second). I am running FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE (as of 24/10/99) and Samba 2.0.5a although the problem occurs on slightly older versions of FreeBSD and of samba. As you can see, the get and put performance is vastly different. The tests were performed on a dedicated network. # smbclient \\\\panic\\upload -N -c "put 1mb.dat" Added interface ip=10.0.2.1 bcast=10.0.2.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Got a positive name query response from 10.0.2.18 ( 10.0.2.18 ) putting file 1mb.dat as \1mb.dat (9.82971 kb/s) (average 9.82971 kb/s) # smbclient \\\\panic\\upload -N -c "get 1mb.dat" Added interface ip=10.0.2.1 bcast=10.0.2.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 Got a positive name query response from 10.0.2.18 ( 10.0.2.18 ) getting file 1mb.dat of size 1048576 as 1mb.dat (425.603 kb/s) (average 425.603 kb/s) If I boot the FreeBSD box into Windows then it can transfer files to the other windows box at high speed. I have reproduced the problem on 3 different FreeBSD boxes and 2 different windows boxes (win95 & win98). I am unsure if the problem is a TCP problem or a Samba problem. During the slow transfer, netstat always reports 2111 bytes in the SendQ on the BSD box. # netstat -n Active Internet connections Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state) tcp 0 2111 10.0.2.1.1108 10.0.2.18.139 ESTABLISHED A tcpdump of the transfer however shows some longish pauses waiting for the windows box to reply. This pause seems to be about the same length of time no matter if the windows box is is a Pentium 120 or a PII 333. 10.0.2.1 (FreeBSD PC) 10.0.2.18 (Windows 95 PC) # tcpdump -i ed0 -n tcpdump: listening on ed0 14:22:47.143804 10.0.2.1.1282 > 10.0.2.255.137: udp 50 14:22:47.144432 10.0.2.18.137 > 10.0.2.1.1282: udp 62 14:22:47.444199 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: S 811544824:811544824(0) win 16384 (DF) 14:22:47.444710 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: S 17659612:17659612(0) ack 811544825 win 8760 (DF) 14:22:47.444921 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: . ack 1 win 17520 (DF) 14:22:47.704063 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: P 1:77(76) ack 1 win 17520 (DF) 14:22:47.704723 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: P 1:5(4) ack 77 win 8684 (DF) 14:22:47.705465 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: P 77:245(168) ack 5 win 17520 (DF) 14:22:47.706348 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: P 5:86(81) ack 245 win 8516 (DF) 14:22:47.718935 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: P 245:339(94) ack 86 win 17520 (DF) 14:22:47.719783 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: P 86:131(45) ack 339 win 8422 (DF) 14:22:47.726618 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: P 339:431(92) ack 131 win 17520 (DF) 14:22:47.728456 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: P 131:177(46) ack 431 win 8330 (DF) 14:22:47.729473 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: P 431:509(78) ack 177 win 17520 (DF) 14:22:47.732845 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: P 177:246(69) ack 509 win 8252 (DF) 14:22:47.740104 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: . 509:1969(1460) ack 246 win 17520 (DF) 14:22:47.933404 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: . ack 1969 win 8760 (DF) 14:22:47.933898 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: P 1969:2620(651) ack 246 win 17520 (DF) 14:22:47.935734 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: P 246:297(51) ack 2620 win 8109 (DF) 14:22:47.936794 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: . 2620:4080(1460) ack 297 win 17520 (DF) 14:22:48.135970 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: . ack 4080 win 8760 (DF) 14:22:48.136422 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: P 4080:4731(651) ack 297 win 17520 (DF) 14:22:48.138145 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: P 297:348(51) ack 4731 win 8109 (DF) 14:22:48.139198 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: . 4731:6191(1460) ack 348 win 17520 (DF) 14:22:48.338442 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: . ack 6191 win 8760 (DF) 14:22:48.338894 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: P 6191:6842(651) ack 348 win 17520 (DF) 14:22:48.340633 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: P 348:399(51) ack 6842 win 8109 (DF) 14:22:48.341720 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: . 6842:8302(1460) ack 399 win 17520 (DF) 14:22:48.540938 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: . ack 8302 win 8760 (DF) 14:22:48.541398 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: P 8302:8953(651) ack 399 win 17520 (DF) 14:22:48.543140 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: P 399:450(51) ack 8953 win 8109 (DF) 14:22:48.544242 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: . 8953:10413(1460) ack 450 win 17520 (DF) I do have "tcp_extensions" switched on but I have tried putting them off and tweaking with the Microsoft TCP stack as well and it makes no difference. Samba has "TCP_NODELAY" as a socket option. If anybody can shed some light on this problem it would be great. Thanks in Advance, Tony --- Tony Jago, System Administrator, E-Mail: T.Jago@its.uq.edu.au Server and Security Group, Phone: +61 7 3365 4078 Information Technology Services, The University of Queensland. Brisbane, Australia. 4072. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sat Oct 23 22:22:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED8114E9C; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 22:22:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@whistle.com) Received: from current1.whiste.com (current1.whistle.com [207.76.205.22]) by alpo.whistle.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA28933; Sat, 23 Oct 1999 22:18:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 23 Oct 1999 22:18:58 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Tony Jago Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, samba@samba.org Subject: Re: Very Poor Samba -> Win9x performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org did you use the port? there is a patch in the ports for a slowness problem. On Sun, 24 Oct 1999, Tony Jago wrote: > > Hello, when transferring a file from a FreeBSD box to a Win9x share using > smbclient the performance appears to be very slow (ie. about 10k per > second). I am running FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE (as of 24/10/99) and Samba > 2.0.5a although the problem occurs on slightly older versions of FreeBSD > and of samba. > > As you can see, the get and put performance is vastly different. The > tests were performed on a dedicated network. > > # smbclient \\\\panic\\upload -N -c "put 1mb.dat" > Added interface ip=10.0.2.1 bcast=10.0.2.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 > Got a positive name query response from 10.0.2.18 ( 10.0.2.18 ) > putting file 1mb.dat as \1mb.dat (9.82971 kb/s) (average 9.82971 kb/s) > > # smbclient \\\\panic\\upload -N -c "get 1mb.dat" > Added interface ip=10.0.2.1 bcast=10.0.2.255 nmask=255.255.255.0 > Got a positive name query response from 10.0.2.18 ( 10.0.2.18 ) > getting file 1mb.dat of size 1048576 as 1mb.dat (425.603 kb/s) (average > 425.603 kb/s) > > If I boot the FreeBSD box into Windows then it can transfer files to the > other windows box at high speed. > > I have reproduced the problem on 3 different FreeBSD boxes and 2 > different windows boxes (win95 & win98). > > I am unsure if the problem is a TCP problem or a Samba problem. During > the slow transfer, netstat always reports 2111 bytes in the SendQ on the > BSD box. > > # netstat -n > Active Internet connections > Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address (state) > tcp 0 2111 10.0.2.1.1108 10.0.2.18.139 ESTABLISHED > > A tcpdump of the transfer however shows some longish pauses waiting for > the windows box to reply. This pause seems to be about the same length of > time no matter if the windows box is is a Pentium 120 or a PII 333. > > 10.0.2.1 (FreeBSD PC) 10.0.2.18 (Windows 95 PC) > > # tcpdump -i ed0 -n > tcpdump: listening on ed0 > 14:22:47.143804 10.0.2.1.1282 > 10.0.2.255.137: udp 50 > 14:22:47.144432 10.0.2.18.137 > 10.0.2.1.1282: udp 62 > 14:22:47.444199 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: S 811544824:811544824(0) > win 16384 (DF) > 14:22:47.444710 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: S 17659612:17659612(0) ack > 811544825 win 8760 (DF) > 14:22:47.444921 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: . ack 1 win 17520 (DF) > 14:22:47.704063 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: P 1:77(76) ack 1 win 17520 > (DF) > 14:22:47.704723 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: P 1:5(4) ack 77 win 8684 > (DF) > 14:22:47.705465 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: P 77:245(168) ack 5 win > 17520 (DF) > 14:22:47.706348 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: P 5:86(81) ack 245 win 8516 > (DF) > 14:22:47.718935 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: P 245:339(94) ack 86 win > 17520 (DF) > 14:22:47.719783 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: P 86:131(45) ack 339 win > 8422 (DF) > 14:22:47.726618 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: P 339:431(92) ack 131 win > 17520 (DF) > 14:22:47.728456 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: P 131:177(46) ack 431 win > 8330 (DF) > 14:22:47.729473 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: P 431:509(78) ack 177 win > 17520 (DF) > 14:22:47.732845 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: P 177:246(69) ack 509 win > 8252 (DF) > 14:22:47.740104 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: . 509:1969(1460) ack 246 > win 17520 (DF) > 14:22:47.933404 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: . ack 1969 win 8760 (DF) > 14:22:47.933898 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: P 1969:2620(651) ack 246 > win 17520 (DF) > 14:22:47.935734 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: P 246:297(51) ack 2620 win > 8109 (DF) > 14:22:47.936794 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: . 2620:4080(1460) ack 297 > win 17520 (DF) > 14:22:48.135970 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: . ack 4080 win 8760 (DF) > 14:22:48.136422 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: P 4080:4731(651) ack 297 > win 17520 (DF) > 14:22:48.138145 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: P 297:348(51) ack 4731 win > 8109 (DF) > 14:22:48.139198 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: . 4731:6191(1460) ack 348 > win 17520 (DF) > 14:22:48.338442 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: . ack 6191 win 8760 (DF) > 14:22:48.338894 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: P 6191:6842(651) ack 348 > win 17520 (DF) > 14:22:48.340633 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: P 348:399(51) ack 6842 win > 8109 (DF) > 14:22:48.341720 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: . 6842:8302(1460) ack 399 > win 17520 (DF) > 14:22:48.540938 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: . ack 8302 win 8760 (DF) > 14:22:48.541398 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: P 8302:8953(651) ack 399 > win 17520 (DF) > 14:22:48.543140 10.0.2.18.139 > 10.0.2.1.1109: P 399:450(51) ack 8953 win > 8109 (DF) > 14:22:48.544242 10.0.2.1.1109 > 10.0.2.18.139: . 8953:10413(1460) ack 450 > win 17520 (DF) > > I do have "tcp_extensions" switched on but I have tried putting them off > and tweaking with the Microsoft TCP stack as well and it makes no > difference. Samba has "TCP_NODELAY" as a socket option. > > If anybody can shed some light on this problem it would be great. Thanks > in Advance, > > Tony > > --- > Tony Jago, System Administrator, E-Mail: T.Jago@its.uq.edu.au > Server and Security Group, Phone: +61 7 3365 4078 > Information Technology Services, > The University of Queensland. Brisbane, Australia. 4072. > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message