From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 7 7:46: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from post.mail.nl.demon.net (post-10.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E643414C16 for ; Sun, 7 Mar 1999 07:46:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roy@lemb.demon.nl) Received: from [212.238.90.91] (helo=bkbvlhbx) by post.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 2.02 #1) id 10JfkQ-00043L-00 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 7 Mar 1999 15:45:47 +0000 Date: Sun, 07 Mar 1999 16:45:43 +0100 From: Roy Leembruggen To: FreeBSD Subject: FreeBSD with ELF binaries Message-Id: <36E29F2729E.64CDROY@post.demon.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver 1.24.13 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am fairly new to Unix/Linux and FreeBSD. I started off with FreeBSD 2.2.7 and was very pleased with the easy installation interface from the cdrom. Also purchased 'The Complete FreeBSD' book by Greg Lehey which helped enormously. This encouraged me to go over to Version 3.0 on cdrom which I found in a bookshop in Amsterdam, but to my surprise after installing it I got the following message when trying to execute fvwm2, afterstep, xsnow etc. /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libkrb.so.3" not found I have now ordered Version 3.1 (stable?) from Walnut Creek and hope I do not get the same problem. In the meantime can anyone kindly enlighten me about this problem, and also let me know where I can find more info about ELF binaries? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 7 8:46:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from barnes1.wustl.edu (barnes1.wustl.edu [128.252.162.58]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90AF14BFC for ; Sun, 7 Mar 1999 08:46:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wayne@barnes1.wustl.edu) Received: (from wayne@localhost) by barnes1.wustl.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) id KAA23748; Sun, 7 Mar 1999 10:48:56 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from wayne) From: Wayne M Barnes Message-Id: <199903071648.KAA23748@barnes1.wustl.edu> Subject: Re: FreeBSD with ELF binaries In-Reply-To: <36E29F2729E.64CDROY@post.demon.nl> from Roy Leembruggen at "Mar 7, 1999 4:45:43 pm" To: roy@lemb.demon.nl (Roy Leembruggen) Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1999 10:48:56 -0600 (CST) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org (stable mailing list at FreeBSD) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I got the same problem several times. My cure is posted at http://barnes1.wustl.edu/ldconfig.hlp Make sure all library subdirectories are listed in your library paths following the examples shown. Also make sure you have been to /usr/port/emulators/linux_lib and done a 'make all install' to pick up all those libraries. The 3.1 rc and rc.conf may also have fixed this, I'm not sure. Wayne M. Barnes, Ph.D. wayne@barnes1.wustl.edu http://barnes1.wustl.edu Just plain Taq is old tech anymore. > I am fairly new to Unix/Linux and FreeBSD. I started off with FreeBSD > 2.2.7 and was very pleased with the easy installation interface from the > cdrom. Also purchased 'The Complete FreeBSD' book by Greg Lehey which > helped enormously. This encouraged me to go over to Version 3.0 on cdrom > which I found in a bookshop in Amsterdam, but to my surprise after > installing it I got the following message when trying to execute fvwm2, > afterstep, xsnow etc. > > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libkrb.so.3" not found > > I have now ordered Version 3.1 (stable?) from Walnut Creek and hope I do > not get the same problem. In the meantime can anyone kindly enlighten me > about this problem, and also let me know where I can find more info > about ELF binaries? > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 7 15:18:35 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from 0.rh.uh.edu (Dorm-36314.RH.UH.EDU [129.7.141.218]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85FB14F2B for ; Sun, 7 Mar 1999 15:18:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wotan@dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu) Received: from dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu (localhost.fosburgh.org [127.0.0.1]) by 0.rh.uh.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id RAA77552 for ; Sun, 7 Mar 1999 17:18:10 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from wotan@dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu) From: Jonathan Fosburgh Reply-To: jef53313@bayou.uh.edu To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Occassional kernel panics when probing ppbus Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1999 17:07:09 -0600 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.17] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <99030717144601.21028@dorm-36314.rh.uh.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-KMail-Mark: Cc: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sometimes when I have my printer (Epson Stylus Color IIs) turned on during a boot up, I receive a kernel panic when ppbus is being probed. The error is something along the lines of "supervisor read, page not present." If there is anyway to capture the output of the panic short of writing it down, I am not familiar with the debugger. Aside from once or twice with a boot disk and once with an improper kernel for my hardware, this has been the only instance I have had with a FreeBSD kernel panicing. It doesn't even happen everytime I boot with the printer turned on, I think it has only happened twice. If anyone can provide me with pointers on how to recover the error message completely, I will certainly provide a copy of it the next time I see it happen. In the meantime, has anyone else seen this problem? My kernel config: device ppc0 at isa? port? net irq 7 controller ppbus0 device nlpt0 at ppbus? device ppi0 at ppbus? and my dmesg: ppc0 at 0x3bc irq 7 on isa ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode nlpt0: on ppbus 0 nlpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus 0 Note that this was with the printer turned off. :) -- Jonathan Fosburgh Geotechnician Snyder Oil Corporation Houston, TX Home Page: http://www.geocities.com/vienna/1498 Manager, FreeBSD Webring: http://www.geocities.com/vienna/1498/computer/freebsdring.html ICQ: 32742908 AIM: Namthorie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Mar 7 16: 4:46 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sloth.cs.unm.edu (sloth.cs.unm.edu [198.59.151.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF75A14DBA for ; Sun, 7 Mar 1999 16:04:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from colinj@cs.unm.edu) Received: from waimea.cs.unm.edu ([198.83.92.103]) by sloth.cs.unm.edu with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 10JnXE-0003b5-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 7 Mar 1999 17:04:40 -0700 Received: from localhost (colinj@localhost) by waimea.cs.unm.edu (980427.SGI.8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA00524 for ; Sun, 7 Mar 1999 17:04:37 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from colinj@cs.unm.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: waimea.cs.unm.edu: colinj owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 7 Mar 1999 17:04:37 -0700 From: Colin Eric Johnson To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: ppc and ppbus break ctrl-alt-del and reboot? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've just in the last couple of days starting playing with the ppc and ppbus controllers in the 3.1-STABLE kernel. While they do seem to be able to sense the parallel port in my machine something else, very strange, has occured. When I attempt to reboot my machine either with ctrl-alt-del or the reboot command all goes well until the actuall reboot of the machine occurs, at which point the entire machine locks up. The file system syncs all seem to happen correctly and the machine is properly halted but will not reboot and nothing short of a complete removal of power will shut the machine off and allow me to restart. I'm doing this on a Dell Lattitude CPi so pulling the power means unplugging it and removing the battery (the power switch won't respond). Has anyone else seen behavior like this in -STABLE? In particular I am interested in getting a parallel zip drive to work but if the necessary kernel changes cause reboot to not play nice then I am a bit concerned. There's something going wrong here but I'm not at all sure what, any insight would be appreciated. Here's what I know in the way of machine info: trurl 1 % uname -a FreeBSD trurl.lternet.edu 3.1-STABLE FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE #16: Sun Mar 7 16:18:03 MST 1999 colinj@trurl.lternet.edu:/usr/src/sys/compile/TRURL i386 From the kernel config (yes I do know that I have the zip driver commented out, that's related to another problem). # ppc ISA-bus parallel port interfaces. device ppc0 at isa? port? tty irq 7 controller ppbus0 #controller vpo0 at ppbus? device nlpt0 at ppbus? trurl 5 % dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-1999 FreeBSD Inc. Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE #16: Sun Mar 7 16:18:03 MST 1999 colinj@trurl.lternet.edu:/usr/src/sys/compile/TRURL Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium II/Xeon/Celeron (267.27-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x650 Stepping=0 Features=0x183f9ff> real memory = 134217728 (131072K bytes) avail memory = 127832064 (124836K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xf029e000. Probing for devices on PCI bus 0: chip0: rev 0x02 on pci0.0.0 vga0: rev 0x01 int a irq 11 on pci0.2.0 pcic0: rev 0x01 int a irq 11 on pci0.3.0 pcic1: rev 0x01 int b irq 11 on pci0.3.1 chip1: rev 0x01 on pci0.7.0 ide_pci0: rev 0x01 on pci0.7.1 chip2: rev 0x01 on pci0.7.3 Probing for devices on the ISA bus: sc0 on isa sc0: VGA color <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x0> atkbdc0 at 0x60-0x6f on motherboard atkbd0 irq 1 on isa psm0 irq 12 on isa psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 ppc0 at 0x378 irq 7 on isa ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold nlpt0: on ppbus 0 nlpt0: Interrupt-driven port sio0 at 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa sio0: type 16550A sio3: configured irq 9 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio3 not found at 0x2e8 pcm0 at 0x52c irq 5 drq 1 flags 0xa613 on isa mss_attach 0 at 0x52c irq 5 dma 1:3 flags 0xa613 fdc0 at 0x3f0-0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: 1.44MB 3.5in wdc0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7 irq 14 on isa wdc0: unit 0 (wd0): wd0: 6194MB (12685680 sectors), 13424 cyls, 15 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S wdc1 at 0x170-0x177 irq 15 on isa wdc1: unit 0 (atapi): , removable, intr, dma, iordis atapi1.0: unknown phase atapi1.0: unknown phase atapi1.0: unknown phase atapi1.0: unknown phase atapi1.0: unknown phase ep0 not found at 0x300 vga0 at 0x3b0-0x3df maddr 0xa0000 msize 131072 on isa npx0 on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface apm0 flags 0x31 on isa apm: found APM BIOS version 1.2 PC-Card VLSI 82C146 (5 mem & 2 I/O windows) pcic: controller irq 3 Initializing PC-card drivers: ep changing root device to wd0s2a Card inserted, slot 0 ep0: utp/bnc[*UTP*] address 00:10:4b:de:66:92 Colin E. Johnson | colinj@unm.edu | http://www.unm.edu/~colinj/ A fabulous reminder that there's more then one way to skin a groove! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 8 1: 9:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from algw2.lucent.com (algw2.lucent.com [205.147.213.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 196611537A for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 01:09:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vissers@algw2.lucent.com) Received: from hzsgg01.nl.lucent.com by alig2.firewall.lucent.com (SMI-8.6/EMS-L sol2) id EAA04095; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 04:24:11 -0500 Received: from lucent.com (hzsgp42.nl.lucent.com) by hzsgg01.nl.lucent.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA26066; Mon, 8 Mar 99 10:09:22 +0100 Message-Id: <36E393A7.F0149D92@lucent.com> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 10:08:55 +0100 From: Jos Vissers X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (WinNT; I) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Panic after completed boot on p5a /k6-2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have an Asus p5a with and AMD K6-2/400 running FreeBSD-stable. Whenever I switch it on it boots just fine up to and including the login prompt but after about 5 to 10 seconds it panics. When it reboots it useually does it again and perhaps the 3rd of 4th boot it will keep running. When I boot windows95 first after switching the machine on, then reboot into FreeBSD, it works just fine. I also have a 486 which doesn't have this problem and runs exactly the same build of FreeBSD. Is there anyone else with a similar problem on the same (or different) hardware? Jos -- Jos Vissers vissers@lucent.com +31 035 687 5302 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 8 1:44:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from awfulhak.org (awfulhak.force9.co.uk [195.166.136.63]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477E714BF4; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 01:44:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (keep.lan.Awfulhak.org [172.16.0.8]) by awfulhak.org (8.9.2/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA16740; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 09:43:43 GMT (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA00787; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 09:13:11 GMT (envelope-from brian@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199903080913.JAA00787@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: John Polstra Cc: Brian Somers , jdp@FreeBSD.org, peter@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, Juriy Goloveshkin Subject: Re: rc.network->rc.firewall->natd In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 08 Feb 1999 10:23:51 PST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 09:13:11 +0000 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Any chance of a repository copy of src/usr.sbin/natd to src/sbin/natd > > (peter & jdp cc'd) ? If it's moved, I'll shift the loading. > > Sorry, I won't have time to do it until next week. Maybe Peter will > have time sooner than that. If next week comes along and it hasn't > been done yet, give me a holler. Any chance of doing this now ? The rc files don't use a full path name, so it shouldn't cause any problems at all. It's probably best to do it for all branches rather than just for -current. TIA. > John > --- > John Polstra jdp@polstra.com > John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA > "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." > -- H. L. Mencken -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 8 2:15:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from june.cs.washington.edu (june.cs.washington.edu [128.95.1.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F44814E43 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 02:15:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wolman@cs.washington.edu) Received: from miles.cs.washington.edu (miles.cs.washington.edu [128.95.4.177]) by june.cs.washington.edu (8.8.7+CS/7.2ju) with ESMTP id CAA22635 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 02:14:48 -0800 Received: from miles.cs.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by miles.cs.washington.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id CAA29587 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 02:14:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wolman@miles.cs.washington.edu) Message-Id: <199903081014.CAA29587@miles.cs.washington.edu> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: kget/install problem with 19990306-STABLE Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 02:14:47 -0800 From: "Alec Wolman" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I installed the 19990306-STABLE snapshot today, and during the installation, I got the following error message: Kernel copied OK, but unable to save boot -c changes to it. See debug screen for details. I looked at the debug screen, and it said: DEBUG: kget: error sizing buffer Is there any more information I can gather that would help to track down this problem? Alec To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 8 2:49:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from europa.salford.ac.uk (europa.salford.ac.uk [146.87.3.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AEB9414DF4 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 02:48:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from M.S.Powell@ais.salford.ac.uk) Received: (qmail 22986 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 1999 10:48:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 22975 invoked from network); 8 Mar 1999 10:48:29 -0000 Received: from plato.salford.ac.uk (146.87.255.76) by europa.salford.ac.uk with SMTP; 8 Mar 1999 10:48:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 33744 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 1999 10:48:28 -0000 Delivered-To: catchall-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: (qmail 33727 invoked by uid 141); 8 Mar 1999 10:48:28 -0000 Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 10:48:27 +0000 (GMT) From: Mark Powell To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: 3.1-R panic Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I need some help determining why a machine is panicing. Specifically, whether it's FreeBSD or the hardware that's causing it. I really want to bring in FreeBSD as the OS of choice to provide our core services, but this is really hurting my cause. When I first installed 3.1 on the machine (an Apricot Shogun), I left the box in a continuous loop doing "make world" for a couple of days. No problem. I assumed the hardware was good. It'd also been previously running NT 3.51 for well over 2 years. However, now it's running inn-2.2 (CNFS with mmapped files), the box keeps panicing (every day or so), with a page fault. It always does this at exactly the same place in the kernel. The gdb -k output is: ------ IdlePTD 2551808 initial pcb at 2134a4 panicstr: page fault panic messages: --- Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0xc fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xf016f1af stack pointer = 0x10:0xf76bcf48 frame pointer = 0x10:0xf7781c38 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 2 (pagedaemon) interrupt mask = trap number = 12 panic: page fault syncing disks... 84 39 29 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 giving up dumping to dev 20401, offset 1277180 dump 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 --- #0 boot (howto=Cannot access memory at address 0x2c. ) at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:285 285 dumppcb.pcb_cr3 = rcr3(); ----- The dmesg output: ----- Copyright (c) 1992-1999 FreeBSD Inc. Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Mar 1 17:27:17 GMT 1999 root@mimas.salford.ac.uk:/usr/src/sys/compile/INN Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz Timecounter "TSC" frequency 130669405 Hz CPU: Pentium/P54C (130.67-MHz 586-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x525 Stepping=5 Features=0x3bf real memory = 100663296 (98304K bytes) avail memory = 95133696 (92904K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xf0265000. Probing for devices on PCI bus 0: chip0: rev 0x02 on pci0.0.0 fxp0: rev 0x04 int a irq 11 on pci0.12.0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:a0:c9:a4:3a:f2 chip1: rev 0x05 on pci0.14.0 Probing for devices on PCI bus 1: chip3: rev 0x02 on pci1.0.0 dpt0: rev 0x02 int a irq 10 on pci1.15.0 dpt0: DPT PM3224A/9X-R W FW Rev. 07CH, 3 channels, 64 CCBs Probing for devices on the ISA bus: sc0 on isa sc0: VGA color <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x0> sio0 at 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa sio0: type 16550A sio1 at 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa sio1: type 16550A atkbdc0 at 0x60-0x6f on motherboard atkbd0 irq 1 on isa fdc0 at 0x3f0-0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: 1.44MB 3.5in ppc0 at 0x378 irq 7 on isa ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold nlpt0: on ppbus 0 nlpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus 0 plip0: on ppbus 0 npx0 on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface vga0 at 0x3b0-0x3df maddr 0xa0000 msize 131072 on isa Intel Pentium detected, installing workaround for F00F bug sa0 at dpt0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0 sa0: Removable Sequential Access SCSI-2 device da0 at dpt0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 4119MB (8436988 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 525C) da1 at dpt0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da1: 20597MB (42183680 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 2625C) changing root device to da0s1a cd0 at dpt0 bus 0 target 5 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present WARNING: / was not properly dismounted ffs_mountfs: superblock updated for soft updates ffs_mountfs: superblock updated for soft updates ----- The kernel config file: ----- machine "i386" cpu "I586_CPU" cpu "I686_CPU" ident INN maxusers 128 options "NMBCLUSTERS=8192" options INET options FFS options FFS_ROOT options "SOFTUPDATES" options "AUTO_EOI_1" options "COMPAT_43" options SCSI_REPORT_GEOMETRY options SCSI_DELAY=0 options UCONSOLE options FAILSAFE options "INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE" options DDB options DDB_UNATTENDED config kernel root on da0 controller isa0 controller pci0 controller fdc0 at isa? port "IO_FD1" bio irq 6 drq 2 disk fd0 at fdc0 drive 0 controller dpt0 options DPT_ALLOW_MEMIO controller scbus0 device da0 device sa0 device pass0 device cd0 device npx0 at isa? port IO_NPX irq 13 device sio0 at isa? port "IO_COM1" flags 0x10 tty irq 4 device sio1 at isa? port "IO_COM2" tty irq 3 device sio2 at isa? disable port "IO_COM3" tty irq 5 device sio3 at isa? disable port "IO_COM4" tty irq 9 controller atkbdc0 at isa? port IO_KBD tty device atkbd0 at isa? tty irq 1 device vga0 at isa? port ? conflicts device sc0 at isa? tty pseudo-device splash device fxp0 # Parallel port device ppc0 at isa? port? net irq 7 controller ppbus0 device nlpt0 at ppbus? device plip0 at ppbus? device ppi0 at ppbus? #controller vpo0 at ppbus? pseudo-device loop pseudo-device ether pseudo-device pty 16 pseudo-device speaker pseudo-device vn 1 pseudo-device snp 2 options KTRACE pseudo-device bpfilter 2 options SYSVSHM options SYSVSEM options SYSVMSG options "MD5" options "ICMP_BANDLIM" ----- Mark Powell - System Administrator (UNIX) - Clifford Whitworth Building A.I.S., University of Salford, Salford, Manchester, UK. Tel: +44 161 295 5936 Fax: +44 161 295 5888 www.pgp.com for PGP key M.S.Powell@ais.salfrd.ac.uk (spell salford correctly to reply to me) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 8 2:49:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from polaris.we.lc.ehu.es (polaris.we.lc.ehu.es [158.227.6.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C2614E1B for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 02:48:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jose@we.lc.ehu.es) Received: from we.lc.ehu.es (garatu [158.227.6.222]) by polaris.we.lc.ehu.es (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA03378; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 11:44:50 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <36E3AA21.9ADE9A91@we.lc.ehu.es> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 11:44:49 +0100 From: "Jose M. Alcaide" Organization: Universidad del Pais Vasco - Dept. de Electricidad y Electronica X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Colin Eric Johnson Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ppc and ppbus break ctrl-alt-del and reboot? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Colin Eric Johnson wrote: > > I've just in the last couple of days starting playing with the ppc and > ppbus controllers in the 3.1-STABLE kernel. While they do seem to be able > to sense the parallel port in my machine something else, very strange, has > occured. When I attempt to reboot my machine either with ctrl-alt-del or > the reboot command all goes well until the actuall reboot of the machine > occurs, at which point the entire machine locks up. The file system syncs > all seem to happen correctly and the machine is properly halted but will > not reboot and nothing short of a complete removal of power will shut the > machine off and allow me to restart. I'm doing this on a Dell Lattitude > CPi so pulling the power means unplugging it and removing the battery (the > power switch won't respond). > Do you have the same problem when doing a "shutdown -h" (or halt) instead of a reboot? A colleague of mine has an IBM Thinkpad which locks when halting/rebooting. However, I think that this also happened when he was running 2.2.8 on his laptop. -- JMA ----------------------------------------------------------------------- José Mª Alcaide | mailto:jose@we.lc.ehu.es Universidad del País Vasco | mailto:jmas@es.FreeBSD.ORG Dpto. de Electricidad y Electrónica | http://www.we.lc.ehu.es/~jose Facultad de Ciencias - Campus de Lejona | Tel.: +34-946012479 48940 Lejona (Vizcaya) - SPAIN | Fax: +34-944858139 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Go ahead... make my day." - H. Callahan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 8 4:33:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from extra.gc.lviv.ua (gc.cscd.lviv.ua [195.5.17.246]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2285114F1A for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 04:33:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vadim@gc.lviv.ua) Received: from gate.gc.lviv.ua (gate.gc.lviv.ua [192.168.168.18]) by extra.gc.lviv.ua (8.9.2/8.9.0) with ESMTP id OAA00322 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 14:32:47 +0200 (EET) Received: from intra (intra.gc.lviv.ua [192.168.1.93]) by gate.gc.lviv.ua (8.9.2/8.9.1) with SMTP id OAA29527 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 14:32:39 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <000b01be695f$9569efb0$5d01a8c0@gc.lviv.ua> From: "Vadim Chekan" To: Subject: No buffer space available Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 14:31:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.0810.800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.0810.800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG What does it means? ping cscd.lviv.ua ping: sendto: No buffer space available ping: sendto: No buffer space available ping: sendto: No buffer space available ^C --- cscd.lviv.ua ping statistics --- 3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss # netstat -m 326/2016 mbufs in use: 244 mbufs allocated to data 44 mbufs allocated to packet headers 38 mbufs allocated to socket names and addresses 105/220/2560 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) 692 Kbytes allocated to network (36% in use) 0 requests for memory denied 0 requests for memory delayed 0 calls to protocol drain routines To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 8 5: 4:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 451EC14D57 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 04:58:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id LAA03433; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 11:38:01 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199903081038.LAA03433@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: No buffer space available To: vadim@gc.lviv.ua (Vadim Chekan) Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 11:38:00 +0100 (MET) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <000b01be695f$9569efb0$5d01a8c0@gc.lviv.ua> from "Vadim Chekan" at Mar 8, 99 02:30:57 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 934 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > What does it means? > > ping cscd.lviv.ua > ping: sendto: No buffer space available > ping: sendto: No buffer space available > ping: sendto: No buffer space available most likely the interface output queue is full (50pkts for ethernets) which often means the link is temporarily down (e.g. coax open) luigi > --- cscd.lviv.ua ping statistics --- > 3 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss > > # netstat -m > 326/2016 mbufs in use: > 244 mbufs allocated to data > 44 mbufs allocated to packet headers > 38 mbufs allocated to socket names and addresses > 105/220/2560 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) > 692 Kbytes allocated to network (36% in use) > 0 requests for memory denied > 0 requests for memory delayed > 0 calls to protocol drain routines > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 8 6: 4: 2 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from easeway.com (ns1.easeway.com [209.69.39.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1858A14E78 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 06:04:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mwlucas@easeway.com) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by easeway.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) id IAA24682 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:59:49 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199903081359.IAA24682@easeway.com> Subject: Re: old lpt just won't die In-Reply-To: <00d501be6722$424798d0$236319ac@w142844.carlson.com> from "Thomas T. Veldhouse" at "Mar 5, 99 10:07:24 am" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:59:49 -0500 (EST) From: mwlucas@exceptionet.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thanks to everyone who replied. For the archives: LINT is incorrect, it should be nlpt0. Also, a "make depend && make all install" forced the old lpt driver to disappear from the kernel. > It should be: > > controller ppbus0 > device nlpt0 at ppbus? > device ppc0 at isa? port? net irq 7 > > Note that it is nlpt, not lpt. It is all in the LINT file for your viewing > pleasure. > > Tom Veldhouse > veldy@visi.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: mwlucas@exceptionet.com > To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Date: Friday, March 05, 1999 9:44 AM > Subject: old lpt just won't die > > > >Hello, > > > >I have a 3.1-stable box that I need to get printing properly. > > > >So, I update my kernel config: > > > ># Parallel port > >controller ppbus0 > >device lpt0 at ppbus? > >device ppc0 at isa? port? net irq 7 > > > >make depend all install, and get on boot: > > > >lpt0 at 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa > >lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > >lp0: TCP/IP capable interface > >lpt-266372352: this driver is deprecated; use ppbus instead. > > > >Okay, fine. Perhaps there's old cruft lying around. I do a "config -r", > >make depend all install. > > > >Same thing. So, any idea what's going on? I have ppbus running fine on > >my -current box. > > > >==ml > >-- > >Michael Lucas | > >Exceptionet, Inc. | www.exceptionet.com > >"Exceptional Networking" | > > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > -- Michael Lucas | Exceptionet, Inc. | www.exceptionet.com "Exceptional Networking" | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 8 6:37:29 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from eagle.plab.ku.dk (eagle.plab.ku.dk [130.225.105.63]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFFB14DBA for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 06:36:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from voland@eagle.plab.ku.dk) Received: (from voland@localhost) by eagle.plab.ku.dk (8.9.2/8.9.1) id PAA73288; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 15:36:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from voland) Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: cvsuping ports From: Vadim Belman Date: 08 Mar 1999 15:36:30 +0100 Message-ID: <85vhgct5e9.fsf@eagle.plab.ku.dk> Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 20.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I think it is a wrong way of dealing with ports tree. Recently I've cvsuped ports tree on my 3.1-STABLE box. This simple action led to a problem: fetch is now being called with -A command line option which isn't present in the version I was using. This is not a big problem for me because I merely cvsuped /usr/src as well and updated the utility from there. But in any case I don't think it is a good idea to follow any changes immediately after they appeared. (I'm afraid the next cvsuping will force me to recompile the kernel and reboot the box... 8-\ 8) -- /Voland Vadim Belman E-mail: voland@plab.ku.dk To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 8 7:19:14 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from xanadu.lovett.com (xanadu.lovett.com [38.155.241.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6286514F1A for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 07:18:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ade@lovett.com) Received: from ade by xanadu.lovett.com with local (Exim 2.12 #1) id 10K1mz-00034K-00; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 09:17:53 -0600 Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 09:17:53 -0600 From: Ade Lovett To: "Jose M. Alcaide" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ppc and ppbus break ctrl-alt-del and reboot? Message-ID: <19990308091752.F4301@remarq.com> References: <36E3AA21.9ADE9A91@we.lc.ehu.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <36E3AA21.9ADE9A91@we.lc.ehu.es>; from Jose M. Alcaide on Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 11:44:49AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 11:44:49AM +0100, Jose M. Alcaide wrote: > > Do you have the same problem when doing a "shutdown -h" (or halt) > instead of a reboot? A colleague of mine has an IBM Thinkpad which > locks when halting/rebooting. However, I think that this also happened > when he was running 2.2.8 on his laptop. I have a similar problem with a Gateway Solo9100, running 3.1-stable. Soft rebooting the machine results in a hang after the BIOS has done its thing, but before the system even tries to access the disk to find the bootblocks. The workaround for me is to enable apm support, shutdown -p, and then hit the power button to bring things back to life. I've seen a somewhat similar problem with the machine when it was running NT, but that's gone away now - it's running FreeBSD exclusively. My (somewhat less than educated) guess points the finger to a broken BIOS, but I'll have to do some more investigation first (I think a 4 hour plane trip on Friday will be an ideal time to look at this :) -aDe -- Ade Lovett, RemarQ Communities, Inc., San Jose, CA. mailto:ade@remarq.com http://www.remarq.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 8 8:36:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sloth.cs.unm.edu (sloth.cs.unm.edu [198.59.151.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76EA14DDB for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 08:36:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from colinj@cs.unm.edu) Received: from sherman.cs.unm.edu ([198.83.92.144]) by sloth.cs.unm.edu with esmtp (Exim 2.10 #1) id 10K31E-0007k5-00; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 09:36:40 -0700 Received: from localhost (colinj@localhost) by sherman.cs.unm.edu (8.9.0/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA00190; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 09:32:33 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: sherman.cs.unm.edu: colinj owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 09:32:32 -0700 (MST) From: Colin Eric Johnson To: "Jose M. Alcaide" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ppc and ppbus break ctrl-alt-del and reboot? In-Reply-To: <36E3AA21.9ADE9A91@we.lc.ehu.es> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Jose M. Alcaide wrote: > Colin Eric Johnson wrote: > > > > I've just in the last couple of days starting playing with the ppc and > > ppbus controllers in the 3.1-STABLE kernel. While they do seem to be able > > to sense the parallel port in my machine something else, very strange, has > > occured. When I attempt to reboot my machine either with ctrl-alt-del or > > the reboot command all goes well until the actuall reboot of the machine > > occurs, at which point the entire machine locks up. The file system syncs > > all seem to happen correctly and the machine is properly halted but will > > not reboot and nothing short of a complete removal of power will shut the > > machine off and allow me to restart. I'm doing this on a Dell Lattitude > > CPi so pulling the power means unplugging it and removing the battery (the > > power switch won't respond). > > > > Do you have the same problem when doing a "shutdown -h" (or halt) > instead of a reboot? A colleague of mine has an IBM Thinkpad which > locks when halting/rebooting. However, I think that this also happened > when he was running 2.2.8 on his laptop. No, in fact I don't a shutdown -h does what it is supposed to do. I haven't tried rebooting after a shutdown, only powering off so I don't know but I suspect that the problem is somewhere in how a reboot is generated on the machine. I'm pretty at the ``grasping at straws'' stage here. Colin E. Johnson | colinj@unm.edu | http://www.unm.edu/~colinj/ ``Science explains the world, but only Art can reconcile us to it.'' -Stanislaw Lem "King Globare and the Sages" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 8 12:26:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695EA14F67 for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 12:26:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA60450; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 12:26:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: "Alec Wolman" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kget/install problem with 19990306-STABLE In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 08 Mar 1999 02:14:47 PST." <199903081014.CAA29587@miles.cs.washington.edu> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 12:26:28 -0800 Message-ID: <60447.920924788@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This just flat-out doesn't work at the moment and we're investigating alternative methods. Sorry for the temporary inconvenience. - Jordan > > I installed the 19990306-STABLE snapshot today, and > during the installation, I got the following error message: > > Kernel copied OK, but unable to save boot -c changes to it. See > debug screen for details. > > I looked at the debug screen, and it said: > > DEBUG: kget: error sizing buffer > > Is there any more information I can gather that would help to > track down this problem? > > Alec > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 8 20:12:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from posgate.acis.com.au (posgate.acis.com.au [203.14.230.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0559014FD6; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 20:12:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au) Received: from bullseye.apana.org.au (uucp@localhost) by posgate.acis.com.au (8.9.2/8.9.2/Debian/GNU) with UUCP id PAA10539; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 15:02:41 +1100 (EST) Received: from bullseye.apana.org.au (central.apana.org.au [203.9.107.245]) by bullseye.apana.org.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA13480; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 08:59:43 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au) Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 08:57:20 +1100 (EDT) From: Andrew MacIntyre To: Mark Powell Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.1-R panic In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-X-Sender: andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 8 Mar 1999, Mark Powell wrote: > I need some help determining why a machine is panicing. Specifically, > whether it's FreeBSD or the hardware that's causing it. I really want to > bring in FreeBSD as the OS of choice to provide our core services, but > this is really hurting my cause. {...} I can't really help with your problem directly, however... I've noticed a few references to stability problems with 3.0R and to a much lesser extent 3.1R. The only way I can think of to isolate whether it is a hardware vs OS issue would be to install 2.2.8 (or even 2.2.7 if CDs are handy) which are known to be extremely stable and reliable. 2.2.7R has been nearly bulletproof for me. I note that the FreeBSD web page still lists both 2.2.8 _and_ 3.1 as "current" releases, from which I infer that there is still the odd rough edge in 3.x to be polished off. -- Andrew I MacIntyre "These thoughts are mine alone..." E-mail: andrew.macintyre@aba.gov.au (work) | Snail: PO Box 370 andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au (play) | Belconnen ACT 2616 Fido: Andrew MacIntyre, 3:620/243.18 | Australia To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 8 20:46:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.directlink.net (mailhost.directlink.net [207.239.163.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3E614FFD for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 20:45:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billh@directlink.net) Received: from directlink.net [207.239.163.119] by mailhost.directlink.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-5.01) id A99EEB300DE; Tue, 09 Mar 1999 00:03:10 EST Message-ID: <36E4A672.556FF610@directlink.net> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 22:41:22 -0600 From: Bill Hamilton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd stable Subject: make depend fails Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG When I do a make depend on cvsup of 3.1 yesterday, I got: In file included from pam_cleartext_pass_ok.c:33: /usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_cleartext_pass_ok/../../../../contrib/libpam/libpam/include/security/pam_modules.h:43: linker_set.h: No such file or directory mkdep: compile failed What caused this? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Mar 8 22: 0:36 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hackerz.org (hackerz.org [209.31.146.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442DC150EF for ; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 22:00:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from randy@hackerz.org) Received: from localhost (randy@localhost) by hackerz.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id BAA13186 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 01:01:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 01:01:00 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Quarri To: freebsd stable Subject: Color messed up for splash screen Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have been trying to put together a splash screen for my box using gimp to generate the image. I am using the vesa module to get a 800x600 image, but all the colors are messed up, though the image displays fine. Any ideas of what I am doing wrong? Quarri To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 9 3:50:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.196.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3122414E70 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 03:50:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp) Received: from zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (IDENT:6dxIufw4SRmHQQXHBEAW7vn/EcIN9fyc@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.42.1]) by outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA26327; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 20:50:10 +0900 (JST) Received: from zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.42.1]) by zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.7.6+2.6Wbeta7/3.4W/zodiac-May96) with ESMTP id UAA13236; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 20:53:22 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <199903091153.UAA13236@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> To: Charles Quarri Cc: freebsd stable , yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp Subject: Re: Color messed up for splash screen In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 09 Mar 1999 01:01:00 EST." References: Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 20:53:21 +0900 From: Kazutaka YOKOTA Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >I have been trying to put together a splash screen for my box using >gimp to generate the image. I am using the vesa module to get a >800x600 image, but all the colors are messed up, though the image >displays fine. Any ideas of what I am doing wrong? The vesa module is suffering from incorrect palette colors lately :-< And I am debugging it. Would you apply the following patch to /sys/i386/isa/vesa.c, rebuild and install the vesa module? The patch will comment out problematic code. Kazu Index: vesa.c =================================================================== RCS file: /src/CVS/src/sys/i386/isa/vesa.c,v retrieving revision 1.18 diff -u -r1.18 vesa.c --- vesa.c 1999/02/20 03:05:37 1.18 +++ vesa.c 1999/03/09 10:35:26 @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ static int int10_set_mode(int mode); static int vesa_bios_get_mode(int mode, struct vesa_mode *vmode); static int vesa_bios_set_mode(int mode); +static int vesa_bios_get_dac(void); static int vesa_bios_set_dac(int bits); static int vesa_bios_save_palette(int start, int colors, u_char *palette, int bits); @@ -233,6 +234,21 @@ } static int +vesa_bios_get_dac(void) +{ + struct vm86frame vmf; + int err; + + bzero(&vmf, sizeof(vmf)); + vmf.vmf_eax = 0x4f08; + vmf.vmf_ebx = 1; /* get DAC width */ + err = vm86_intcall(0x10, &vmf); + if ((err != 0) || (vmf.vmf_eax != 0x4f)) + return 6; /* XXX */ + return ((vmf.vmf_ebx >> 8) & 0x00ff); +} + +static int vesa_bios_set_dac(int bits) { struct vm86frame vmf; @@ -832,16 +848,20 @@ static int vesa_save_palette(video_adapter_t *adp, u_char *palette) { +#if notyet int bits; int error; - if ((adp == vesa_adp) && (vesa_adp_info->v_flags & V_DAC8) - && ((bits = vesa_bios_set_dac(8)) > 6)) { + bits = 6; + if ((adp == vesa_adp) && (vesa_adp_info->v_flags & V_DAC8) + && VESA_MODE(adp->va_mode)) { + bits = vesa_bios_get_dac(); error = vesa_bios_save_palette(0, 256, palette, bits); - vesa_bios_set_dac(6); if (error == 0) return 0; + bits = vesa_bios_set_dac(6); } +#endif /* notyet */ return (*prevvidsw->save_palette)(adp, palette); } @@ -849,16 +869,19 @@ static int vesa_load_palette(video_adapter_t *adp, u_char *palette) { +#if notyet int bits; int error; + bits = 6; if ((adp == vesa_adp) && (vesa_adp_info->v_flags & V_DAC8) - && ((bits = vesa_bios_set_dac(8)) > 6)) { + && VESA_MODE(adp->va_mode) && ((bits = vesa_bios_set_dac(8)) > 6)) { error = vesa_bios_load_palette(0, 256, palette, bits); - vesa_bios_set_dac(6); if (error == 0) return 0; + bits = vesa_bios_set_dac(6); } +#endif /* notyet */ return (*prevvidsw->load_palette)(adp, palette); } @@ -1069,7 +1092,9 @@ static int vesa_unload(void) { + u_char palette[256*3]; int error; + int bits; int s; /* if the adapter is currently in a VESA mode, don't unload */ @@ -1083,8 +1108,16 @@ s = spltty(); if ((error = vesa_unload_ioctl()) == 0) { if (vesa_adp != NULL) { - if (vesa_adp_info->v_flags & V_DAC8) - vesa_bios_set_dac(6); + if (vesa_adp_info->v_flags & V_DAC8) { + bits = vesa_bios_get_dac(); + if (bits > 6) { + vesa_bios_save_palette(0, 256, + palette, bits); + vesa_bios_set_dac(6); + vesa_bios_load_palette(0, 256, + palette, 6); + } + } vesa_adp->va_flags &= ~V_ADP_VESA; vidsw[vesa_adp->va_index] = prevvidsw; } To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 9 6:44:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from granite.sentex.net (granite.sentex.ca [199.212.134.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D437B14BDD for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 06:44:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from leaverite (leaverite.sentex.ca [209.112.4.36]) by granite.sentex.net (8.8.8/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA14938; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 09:43:00 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990309094658.04650a80@staff.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@staff.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 09:46:58 -0500 To: Mark Powell , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: 3.1-R panic In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >options "SOFTUPDATES" >pseudo-device splash Assuming its not hardware, and it doesnt sound like it, I would try getting rid of the softupdates option. From a number of people who are having panics, many have softupdates turned on. However, I know of a lot of people with softupdates, and they are running solid. Still, news is fairly disk intensive and might be triggering some deadlock somewhere. Also, the situation below might be relavant to you... At 04:35 PM 3/4/99 -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: > The problem is a deadlock caused by the fgrep. The fgrep is mmap()ing > the file, but then it does some really weird crap when dealing with > larger files. > > It's the most idiotic code I've ever seen. The code uses a PRIVATE+RW > mmap() until it gets to odd point in the file, at which point it read()'s > additional information from the file into the mapped space ( that might > contain a previous mmap'd portion of the file ). > > So what happens is this: > > * read() call > * shared lock obtained on vnode > > ( some other process attempts to get shared lock on vnode and > succeeds... for example, a namei operation is attempted by > another grep ) > > * access MMAP'd area > * exclusive lock attempt obtained on same vnode. This blocks because > some other process has a shared lock on the vnode. > > ( the other process then attempts to get an exclusive lock on the > vnode this blocks. > > Deadlock. > > Even worse, the gnu grep does not bother munmap()'ing the space so, in > fact, the deadlock can occur between two unrelated files as well as with > the same file. This is the more likely deadlock scenario. > > The solution is more difficult. We could hack an exception for PRIVATE > mmap's... there really is no need for the vm_fault code to lock the vnode. > Howver, other situations can occur where this hack would not work. > > This is 'kinda a known problem' in FreeBSD. We really need to find a > solution to it. Other similar deadlocks can occur if you mmap() one file > and read() or write() data from it to another file, and vise versa at > the same time. > > Personally, I think the only real solution is to make vn_read() and > vn_write() lock the uio space as well as the vnode being read or > written. It would have to do it in the right order, and it would have > to deal with the situation where the uio space covers multiple vnodes. > > Alternately, vnodes need to be redesigned without these fraggin > all-encompassing locks for data R+W ops. > > -Matt > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mike Tancsa, tel 01.519.651.3400 Network Administrator, mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 9 7: 1:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hackerz.org (hackerz.org [209.31.146.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA9C14EFD for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 07:01:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from randy@hackerz.org) Received: from localhost (randy@localhost) by hackerz.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id KAA14132; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 10:01:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 10:01:21 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Quarri To: Kazutaka YOKOTA Cc: freebsd stable Subject: Re: Color messed up for splash screen In-Reply-To: <199903091153.UAA13236@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 9 Mar 1999, Kazutaka YOKOTA wrote: > >I have been trying to put together a splash screen for my box using > >gimp to generate the image. I am using the vesa module to get a > >800x600 image, but all the colors are messed up, though the image > >displays fine. Any ideas of what I am doing wrong? > > The vesa module is suffering from incorrect palette colors lately :-< > And I am debugging it. > > Would you apply the following patch to /sys/i386/isa/vesa.c, rebuild > and install the vesa module? > > The patch will comment out problematic code. I just try it and it worked like a charm, Thanks! Any idea of when this will be commited to 3.x-stable? Quarri To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 9 11:40:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from diamond.ripn.net (diamond.ripn.net [195.19.26.76]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942F31510E for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 11:39:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ilya@diamond.ripn.net) Received: (from ilya@localhost) by diamond.ripn.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) id WAA67210 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 22:39:32 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ilya) Message-Id: <199903091939.WAA67210@diamond.ripn.net> Subject: can't get 'tin' working To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 22:39:32 +0300 (MSK) From: Ilya Varlashkin X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello All Recently I've upgraded my 2.2-STABLE box to 3.1-STABLE. Although I've made this through 'make aout-to-elf' I've removed and recompiled all ports I'm using. Everything has been built just fine except damn things with tin package. 'tin' port requires 'uulib' that I've successfuly built and installed. However when I try to 'make configure' I get 'can not find uulib' error. I ran 'ldconfig -R' and even rebooted my box, although without success. Could anyone point me what can be wrong? Thanks in advance! -- Ilya Varlashkin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 9 18:30:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from booger.messerschmitt (cust64.tnt1.dial.tor2.uunet.ca [209.47.186.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41D915080 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 18:30:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kid@secureshell.com) Received: from eye (kid@eye.messerschmitt [192.168.1.11]) by booger.messerschmitt (8.9.2/8.9.1) with SMTP id VAA01156 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 21:30:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from kid@secureshell.com) From: john Reply-To: johnchia@innocent.com To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: NFS Weirdness (CDROM mount, acd) Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 21:35:02 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.17] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <99030921404500.00236@eye> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-KMail-Mark: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm using NFS to mount a cd-rom I have on a FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE box. It's an ATAPI (el-cheapo) 6x cd-rom. I had to resort to some trickery to get it to mount.. mount_cd9660 -s 0 or some such. The problem is my Linux 2.2 box really just _hangs_ if it tries to list a any directory below /cdrom All other file-sharing schemes work fine (netatalk, samba), just NFS that seems to puke on this. Any ideas? System is FreeBSD-STABLE grabbed from CVS around Feb 20. -- john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 9 19: 8: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from kot.ne.mediaone.net (kot.ne.mediaone.net [24.218.12.203]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E721214FF4; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 19:07:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net) Received: (from mi@localhost) by kot.ne.mediaone.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id WAA29002; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 22:06:20 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Teterin Message-Id: <199903100306.WAA29002@kot.ne.mediaone.net> Subject: custom kernel hanging To: questions@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 22:06:20 -0500 (EST) X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w hJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli"; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 19:23:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cy@cschuber.net.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.1/8.8.8) id TAA12720 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 19:22:55 -0800 Received: from cschuber.net.gov.bc.ca(142.31.240.113), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda12718; Tue Mar 9 19:22:45 1999 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id TAA32773 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 19:22:43 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199903100322.TAA32773@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdD32770; Tue Mar 9 19:22:36 1999 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 2.2.8-RELEASE X-Sender: cy To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: syncing filesystems... giving up Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 19:22:32 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've managed to convert a couple of systems to 3.1R. Both systems have SCSI controllers, one with 2940UW2, one SCSI hard disk, a SCSI CDROM drive, and 4mm external tape drive the other with a 1542CF, two SCSI hard disks (+ 2 IDE hard disks), SCSI CDROM drive, and a 4mm internal tape drive. In both cases I've noticed that when shutting the systems down (halt or reboot) I get "syncing filesystems... giving up" more frequently (about 75% of reboots) than under 2.x.x (2.0.5 - 2.2.8). Has anyone else noticed this? I haven't used 3.1R on IDE only systems (I have two other systems with only IDE peripherals, however these haven't been upgraded yet). One of the systems (the one with the 2940UW2) had been running with CAM patches installed on 2.2.6 through 2.2.8 with no problems. Does anyone have any ideas? Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Open Systems Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca ITSD Cy.Schubert@gems8.gov.bc.ca Province of BC To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 9 19:38: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shell13.ba.best.com (shell13.ba.best.com [206.184.139.144]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F140150A0 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 19:38:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rone@ennui.org) Received: (from rone@localhost) by shell13.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.sh) id TAA06843 for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 19:37:24 -0800 (PST) From: onomatopoetic justice Message-Id: <199903100337.TAA06843@shell13.ba.best.com> Subject: Re: custom kernel hanging In-Reply-To: <199903100306.WAA29002@kot.ne.mediaone.net> from Mikhail Teterin at "Mar 9, 99 10:06:20 pm" To: stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 19:37:24 -0800 (PST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mikhail Teterin writes: This new machine has the today's usual PIIX dual channel IDE controller, with a primary master hard-drive and a secondary master CD. It also has the Adaptec-2940 with a single disk. The generic kernel boots fine, but the custom one I'm making hangs after reporting the da0 device and claiming (if I boot with -v) wd0s1a to be a root device (which is true). It just sits there. I can press "Scroll Lock" and PageUp -- that works. But it is not booting any further. I tried switching the AHC_ALLOW_MEMIO back and forth... Can the softupdates present in the new kernel be the problem? The OS is 3.1-RELEASE. All of the partitions have softupdates enabled except for the root one (wd0s1a). The /usr resides on the SCSI disk... I have the same problem, except i have no softupdates and no SCSI. If i boot with kernel.GENERIC, it boots fine. Otherwise, it boots past npx0, then it reports de0 is in full duplex mode (which normally shows up after /etc/rc starts running), and hangs there. I will keep fiddling with it to see if i can get it to boot all the way through. rone -- In the truest spirit of usenet I actually have zero idea what I'm talking about and am making all this up, but it does seem reasonable and has the added benefint of possibly even beng true. - Richard Sexton To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 9 20:13:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from thor.afnetinc.com (thor.afnetinc.com [206.40.232.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D39C14FF4 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 20:13:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from efinley@efinley.com) Received: from 206-40-232-237-pm3-0.afnetinc.com ([206.40.232.237]) by thor.afnetinc.com with smtp (Exim 2.05 #1) id 10KaMh-0000jw-00; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 21:13:04 -0700 From: efinley@efinley.com (Elliot Finley) To: doka@kiev.sovam.com Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Request to bring sendmail 8.9.3 in STABLE-3.1 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 04:14:20 GMT Organization: Hiawatha Coal Company Reply-To: efinley@efinley.com Message-ID: <36e8f165.100587267@mail.afnetinc.com> References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Exim... Yeah, that's the ticket! I use it here, and it performs really well. On Fri, 5 Mar 1999 17:08:31 +0200 (EET), you wrote: >Hello! > >On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, Cy Schubert wrote: > >> > : I would like to see the latest sendmail 8.9.3 being backported to >> >=20 >> > Add my vote as well. >> >=20 >> Count me in too. > > Let's make exim as main MTA in FreeBSD :-) > >/doka > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > --=20 Elliot (efinley@efinley.com) "The box said 'Requires Windows 95, NT, or better,' so I installed = FreeBSD." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 9 20:26:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp2.jps.net (smtp2.jps.net [209.63.224.235]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2595214BEA for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 20:26:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from onemo@jps.net) Received: from jps.net (209-63-253-182.smf.jps.net [209.63.253.182]) by smtp2.jps.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA15922 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 20:25:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <36E5F350.4A7E5C1E@jps.net> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 20:21:36 -0800 From: me X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: named message since upgrading to 3.1-Stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello all, I keep getting the following message from named: ... named[104]: bind(dfd=24), [{ip addr}].53): Permission denied I chown'd the /etc/namedb/s directory to the bind sandbox ID as instructed. I'm using the following named.conf file: // $Id: named.conf,v 1.3 1998/11/14 19:43:00 mso Exp $ // options { directory "/etc/namedb"; dump-file "s/named_dump.db"; forward only; forwarders { (isp addr1); (isp addr2); }; }; zone "." { type hint; file "named.root"; }; zone "0.0.127.IN-ADDR.ARPA" { type master; file "s/named.local.rev"; }; zone "mydomain.com" { type master; file "s/mydomain.hosts"; }; zone "2.168.192.in-addr.arpa" { type master; file "s/mydomain.rev"; }; I've searched through the BIND faqs and docs located at the ISC site to no avail. Everything works correctly, It's just 1) annoying and 2) possibly bothering my ISP(?). Any help would be appreciated. MO! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 9 21:11:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com (ha1.rdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.0.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C67414E7C for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 21:11:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from charon@freethought.org) Received: from c40948-a ([24.1.7.99]) by mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail v4.00.03 201-229-104) with SMTP id <19990310051111.IVL21746.mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com@c40948-a> for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 21:11:11 -0800 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990309211055.00943c30@mail> X-Sender: tuathadedanann@mail X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Tue, 09 Mar 1999 21:10:55 -0800 To: stable@freebsd.org From: charon@freethought.org Subject: replacing sources with ctm Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG (I know I asked this question before, in some form, but I never really got an answer, and searches of the mail archives turned up empty as well.) Somewhere between the Handbook page on CTM and the tutorial "making the world your own," I got a bit confused. Do I _replace_ the stuff in /usr/src with the new sources from CTM? CTM won't directly write to the /usr/src directory. I thought I had to have the CTM sources in another (arbitrary) directory, but then do I have two copies of the source? The "making the world your own" tutorial says that it assumes I "have downloaded a version of the FreeBSD source code and placed it in /usr/src," but the CTM Handbook page seems to indicate that I should use another directory. What's up? I did change the symlink '/sys' to point to the new '/whevever/I/used/ctm/sys', but sys isn't all of the source, is it? Thanks, -charon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 9 22: 6:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from math.missouri.edu (math.missouri.edu [128.206.72.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2131B14CF6 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 22:06:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from math.missouri.edu (Mizzou-AS9-13.missouri.edu [128.206.209.157]) by math.missouri.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA15535; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 00:05:39 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <36E60BDE.89723F1B@math.missouri.edu> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 00:06:22 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: charon@freethought.org Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: replacing sources with ctm References: <3.0.5.32.19990309211055.00943c30@mail> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I couldn't figure out the handbook either. Let me describe what I did. First, clean out /usr/src . Then get the CTM files. Now, the first file has to be one that starts from scratch, that is, either a file like src-2.2-2600xEmpty.gz or the file src-3.0001.gz. I used the latter. So get your ctm files, say, src-3.0001.gz to src-3.0021.gz. Let's say they are in ~mine/ctm . So you do cd /usr/src ctm ~mine/ctm/src* This will populate /usr/src completely up to whatever src-3.0021.gz has. Now you can do a make world, etc. As the new src-*.gz files come in, you can do the ctm commands again, and it will only process the new ctm files (and give you error messages if you skipped some). Once you get used to it, ctm is a really nice way to go. It does the ports nicely, too. The important thing, again, is to start with a totally clean /usr/ports directory (say mv /usr/ports /usr/ports-old ; mkdir /usr/ports ). I hope this helps. -- Stephen Montgomery-Smith stephen@math.missouri.edu 307 Math Science Building stephen@showme.missouri.edu Department of Mathematics stephen@missouri.edu University of Missouri-Columbia Columbia, MO 65211 USA Phone (573) 882 4540 Fax (573) 882 1869 http://math.missouri.edu/~stephen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 9 23:38:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from regpc30.murdoch.edu.au (regpc30.murdoch.edu.au [134.115.241.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F6514FF4 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 23:38:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jarvis@guru.wow.aust.com) Received: from guru.wow.aust.com (regmac23.murdoch.edu.au [134.115.241.182]) by regpc30.murdoch.edu.au (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA22331; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:37:53 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from jarvis@guru.wow.aust.com) Message-ID: <36E62159.BDDFAC00@guru.wow.aust.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:38:48 +0800 From: Jarvis Cochrane Reply-To: jarvis@guru.wow.aust.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 (Macintosh; I; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG" Subject: Problems with WINE - FreeBSD bug? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I've been trying to run multiple instances of wine 310199, installed from the ports collection, on my FreeBSD 2.2.8 box. (486@33Mhz, 16Mb, 2x1Gb SCSI disks) One instance of wine will run _fine_. However, the moment a second instance is started, the first instance exits - usually pretty cleanly, while the second instance continues to run. I've had some help from Ulrich Weiland (WINE) in debugging this, but he has reached in impasse (see quoted mail below). The first point he raised was that a semget call fails. The second point was that the kind of behaviour my machine was exhibiting was theoretically impossible! Has anyone been able to run multiple instances of wine? Would anyone like to try? Thanks, Jarvis > Subject: > Re: Multiple instances of wine? > Date: > Fri, 5 Mar 1999 19:22:48 +0100 (MET) > From: > Ulrich Weigand Subject: > Re: Multiple instances of wine? > Date: > Fri, 5 Mar 1999 19:22:48 +0100 (MET) > From: > Ulrich Weigand > To: > jarvis@guru.wow.aust.com > > > I ran wine with the debugging options you requested and tried to send > > the output to you. > > > > Did you receive it ok? > > Yes, I received it fine. Unfortunately I still haven't got any clue > what could be going on here ... > > If you look at the end of the first trace, it is happily excuting its > message loop (apparently receiving WM_TIMER messages regularily), when > out of a sudden, without any other trace message, it simply fails this > assertion (the same test which has passed hundreds of times just before). > > The second trace also yields no clue; it is basically identically to the > first one, up to the point where the first one crashed and the second > continues. > > So I don't know how to proceed now; unfortunately I have neither any > experience with FreeBSD nor even ready access to a FreeBSD box. > > The first point I would attack is to find out exactly why the 'semget' > call fails. Until this is understood, everything else doesn't really > help much ... Maybe at this point it would be useful to contact FreeBSD > experts? > > Any further debugging on Wine itself would require more than just > trace messages, I'm afraid. Do I recall correctly that you didn't > compile Wine yourself but installed a binary version? If you are > interested in debugging this problem further, you'd probably need > to compile from source so that you can use a debugger for further > analysis ... > > > Bye, > Ulrich > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Mar 9 23:49:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ihgw2.lucent.com (ihgw2.lucent.com [207.19.48.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB18114F81; Tue, 9 Mar 1999 23:49:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vissers@ihgw2.lucent.com) Received: from hzsgg01.nl.lucent.com by ihig2.firewall.lucent.com (SMI-8.6/EMS-L sol2) id BAA04212; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 01:36:06 -0600 Received: from lucent.com (hzsgp42.nl.lucent.com) by hzsgg01.nl.lucent.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA13430; Wed, 10 Mar 99 08:48:45 +0100 Message-Id: <36E623BF.97A25094@lucent.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 08:48:15 +0100 From: Jos Vissers X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (WinNT; I) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: custom kernel hanging References: <199903100306.WAA29002@kot.ne.mediaone.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mikhail Teterin wrote: > This new machine has the today's usual PIIX dual channel IDE > controller, with a primary master hard-drive and a secondary master > CD. It also has the Adaptec-2940 with a single disk. The generic > kernel boots fine, but the custom one I'm making hangs after > reporting the da0 device and claiming (if I boot with -v) wd0s1a > to be a root device (which is true). [...] I had something similar, I increased SCSI_DELAY, which I useually set to something like 3 seconds, to 10 seconds (default is 15) and that seemed to do the trick. The -stable I am running now accepts a SCSI_DELAY of 3 seconds just fine. I must say that I did have a tape ft0 specified somewhere in the kernel config at one point which I also removed since it is no longer listed in LINT and I'm not using it anyway. Jos -- Jos Vissers vissers@lucent.com +31 035 687 5302 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 10 1:25:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mel.alcatel.fr (mel.alcatel.fr [212.208.74.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A506D14FF4 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 01:25:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr) Received: from aifhs2.alcatel.fr (mailhub.alcatel.fr [155.132.180.80]) by mel.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP) with ESMTP id KAA00892; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:24:14 +0100 Received: from lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (lune.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.144.65]) by aifhs2.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP2) with ESMTP id JAA17361; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 09:27:10 +0100 (MET) Received: from telss1.telspace.alcatel.fr (telss1.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.51.4]) by lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id JAA14594; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 09:12:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from telspace.alcatel.fr (nairobi.telspace.alcatel.fr) by telss1.telspace.alcatel.fr (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA21128; Wed, 10 Mar 99 09:21:58 +0100 Message-Id: <36E62CDA.AB62F990@telspace.alcatel.fr> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 09:27:06 +0100 From: HERBELOT Thierry Organization: Alcatel Telspace X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4m) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: syncing filesystems... giving up References: <199903100322.TAA32773@cwsys.cwsent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, One problem was the use of MFS (I had it for /tmp and had the same prob with sync) I don't remember if this was fixed or not. TfH Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > > I've managed to convert a couple of systems to 3.1R. Both systems have > SCSI controllers, one with 2940UW2, one SCSI hard disk, a SCSI CDROM > drive, and 4mm external tape drive the other with a 1542CF, two SCSI > hard disks (+ 2 IDE hard disks), SCSI CDROM drive, and a 4mm internal > tape drive. In both cases I've noticed that when shutting the systems > down (halt or reboot) I get "syncing filesystems... giving up" more > frequently (about 75% of reboots) than under 2.x.x (2.0.5 - 2.2.8). > Has anyone else noticed this? I haven't used 3.1R on IDE only systems > (I have two other systems with only IDE peripherals, however these > haven't been upgraded yet). One of the systems (the one with the > 2940UW2) had been running with CAM patches installed on 2.2.6 through > 2.2.8 with no problems. > > Does anyone have any ideas? > > Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 > Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 > Open Systems Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca > ITSD Cy.Schubert@gems8.gov.bc.ca > Province of BC > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 10 4:45:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from kot.ne.mediaone.net (kot.ne.mediaone.net [24.218.12.203]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93272150D9 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 04:45:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net) Received: (from mi@localhost) by kot.ne.mediaone.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id HAA29938 for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 07:44:14 -0500 (EST) From: Mikhail Teterin Message-Id: <199903101244.HAA29938@kot.ne.mediaone.net> Subject: softupdates on the NFS exported partition To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 22:08:31 -0500 (EST) X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w hJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli"; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 07:32:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marka@metaip.checkpoint.com) Received: from cartman.metainfo.com (cartman.metainfo.com [204.29.28.145]) by postal.metaip.checkpoint.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id GAA02803; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 06:56:46 -0800 Received: from moby.dev.metainfo.com (sneakers.metainfo.com [204.29.28.213]) by cartman.metainfo.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.1960.3) id GT68WFGZ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 07:16:52 -0800 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 07:31:21 -0800 (PST) From: Mark Atkinson X-Sender: marka@moby.dev.metainfo.com Reply-To: marka@metaip.checkpoint.com To: steve@ns1.cioe.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PAM and RADIUS? (fwd) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Since I don't subscribe to stable, I'm not sure this will make it into the mailing archive, but... On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Steve Ames wrote: > Has anyone gotten telnet authentication working with PAM and RADIUS? > I posed this question in freebsd-isp but didn't see any takers. yes. It works on my 3.1 boxen. > By RADIUS server says that its authenticating just fine but login > is still saying denied. Frustrating. > > Anyone got a working pam.conf they can share? Let's take a peek: # Configuration file for Pluggable Authentication Modules (PAM). # # This file controls the authentication methods that login and other # utilities use. See pam(8) for a description of its format. # # Note: the final entry must say "required" -- otherwise, things don't # work quite right. If you delete the final entry, be sure to change # "sufficient" to "required" in the entry before it. # # $FreeBSD: src/etc/pam.conf,v 1.1 1998/11/20 23:20:01 jdp Exp $ # If the user can authenticate with S/Key, that's sufficient. login auth sufficient pam_skey.so # Check skey.access to make sure it is OK to let the user type in # a cleartext password. If not, then fail right here. login auth requisite pam_cleartext_pass_ok.so # If you want KerberosIV authentication, uncomment the next line: #login auth sufficient pam_kerberosIV.so try_first_pass login auth sufficient pam_radius.so # Traditional getpwnam() authentication. login auth required pam_unix.so try_first_pass > What RADIUS attributes should I be returning to make this work? On your FreeBSD boxen you also need a /etc/radius.conf, here's an example: # radius server ip shared secret time-out re-try 192.168.1.166 admin 5 1 then on your RADIUS server: service-type should be 'authenticate only' (attribute 8 has a value of 6) in your access-accept packet > Where do I find more info on PAM so I can answer such questions > myself? % man -k pam pam.conf(5), PAM(5) - Pluggable Authentication Modules pam_authenticate(3) - authenticate a user pam_chauthtok(3) - updating authentication tokens pam_fail_delay(3) - request a delay on failure pam_open_session(3), pam_open/close_session(3) - PAM session management pam_setcred(3) - set the credentials for the user pam_start(3), pam_end(3) - activating PAM pam_strerror(3) - return a textual description of a PAM error also useful: % man -k radius radius.conf(5) - RADIUS client configuration file -- Mark Atkinson Checkpoint Technologies' MetaIP Group !(wired)?(coffee++):(wired) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 10 10:28:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dpi.dgtu.donetsk.ua (dgtu-dipt-38.4K.dgtu.donetsk.ua [194.44.183.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F89151B5 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:27:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yk@info.dgtu.donetsk.ua) Received: from info.dgtu.donetsk.ua (root@info.dgtu.donetsk.ua [194.44.183.7]) by dpi.dgtu.donetsk.ua (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA28746; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 20:14:16 +0200 (EET) Received: (from yk@localhost) by info.dgtu.donetsk.ua (8.8.7/8.8.5) id UAA10061; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 20:14:15 +0200 (EET) From: Yury Yaroshevsky Message-Id: <199903101814.UAA10061@info.dgtu.donetsk.ua> Subject: Re: 3.1-STABLE - also freeze :((( [see crashe 3.1-RELEASE ...] In-Reply-To: <19990306111122.B29044@holly.dyndns.org> from "Chris Costello" at "Mar 6, 99 11:11:22 am" To: chris@calldei.com Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 20:14:14 +0200 (EET) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Whoops! It doesn't stick those into the background... but it > does stick the sh processes into the background while they > continually run find over and over. > > > > > This is shooting yourself in the foot. What do you plan on > > doing with that, anyway? > > > > (This will exceed the max process limit very quickly.) > > Why 2.2.8-STABLE is fine working with this script? > > > I'm can't create any connections with my box, also from console. > > > > > > 2.2-STABLE is not freeze and fine work atfer starting crash script about 5-6 > > > hours, until I'm kill my script. -- Yury V. Yaroshevsky | Donetsk State Technical University YY18-RIPE | (380 62) 3356455 yk@dgtu.donetsk.ua To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 10 10:30:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dpi.dgtu.donetsk.ua (dgtu-dipt-38.4K.dgtu.donetsk.ua [194.44.183.253]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6119C150B2 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:27:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yk@info.dgtu.donetsk.ua) Received: from info.dgtu.donetsk.ua (root@info.dgtu.donetsk.ua [194.44.183.7]) by dpi.dgtu.donetsk.ua (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA28725; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 20:11:39 +0200 (EET) Received: (from yk@localhost) by info.dgtu.donetsk.ua (8.8.7/8.8.5) id UAA10047; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 20:11:37 +0200 (EET) From: Yury Yaroshevsky Message-Id: <199903101811.UAA10047@info.dgtu.donetsk.ua> Subject: Re: 3.1-STABLE - also freeze :((( [see crashe 3.1-RELEASE ...] In-Reply-To: <19990306110706.A29044@holly.dyndns.org> from "Chris Costello" at "Mar 6, 99 11:07:06 am" To: chris@calldei.com Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 20:11:37 +0200 (EET) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Sat, Mar 6, 1999, Yury Yaroshevsky put this into my mailbox: > > Hi All! > > > > 03.03.99 I'm wrote about freeze 3.1-RELEASE after starting this script : > > > > -------- cut here ------- > > #! /bin/sh > > > > for j in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > > do > > echo -n $j > > nohup sh -c 'while :; do find / -type f |xargs fgrep fcom; done' >/dev/null ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > 2>&1 & > > echo > > done > > ------------------------ > > > > At next day I'm upgrade my 3.1-R box to 3.1-S, but without visible effects. > > After 2-3 min perfoming this script, my box can't start any processes. > > Take a real good look at what you're doing. > > For each number out of 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10: > > * You spawn one process. > * It continually spawns more and more processes, sticking them > into the background. Where ???? I'am spawn _one_ proccess. But this proccess is infinity find ... > This is shooting yourself in the foot. What do you plan on > doing with that, anyway? > > (This will exceed the max process limit very quickly.) No, I'm spawn only 10 processes. -- Yury V. Yaroshevsky | Donetsk State Technical University YY18-RIPE | (380 62) 3356455 yk@dgtu.donetsk.ua To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 10 10:38:13 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU (soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.43.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B1F15094 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:38:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dbushong@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU) Received: (from dbushong@localhost) by soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU (8.8.8/) id KAA21282; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:37:22 -0800 (PST) env-from (dbushong) From: dbushong@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU (David Bushong) Message-Id: <199903101837.KAA21282@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU> Subject: Re: syncing filesystems... giving up In-Reply-To: <36E62CDA.AB62F990@telspace.alcatel.fr> from HERBELOT Thierry at "Mar 10, 99 09:27:06 am" To: Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr (HERBELOT Thierry) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:37:22 -0800 (PST) Cc: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL38 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ah HAH! Thanks! Now I know what I changed just before this started happening to me too (I have an AHA2940UW). I will try putting umount /tmp in /etc/rc.shutdown, but what's the reason for this problem? I have lots of memory and like my nice fast /tmp... --David Bushong > Hello, > > One problem was the use of MFS (I had it for /tmp and had the same prob > with sync) > > I don't remember if this was fixed or not. > > TfH > > > Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > > > > I've managed to convert a couple of systems to 3.1R. Both systems have > > SCSI controllers, one with 2940UW2, one SCSI hard disk, a SCSI CDROM > > drive, and 4mm external tape drive the other with a 1542CF, two SCSI > > hard disks (+ 2 IDE hard disks), SCSI CDROM drive, and a 4mm internal > > tape drive. In both cases I've noticed that when shutting the systems > > down (halt or reboot) I get "syncing filesystems... giving up" more > > frequently (about 75% of reboots) than under 2.x.x (2.0.5 - 2.2.8). > > Has anyone else noticed this? I haven't used 3.1R on IDE only systems > > (I have two other systems with only IDE peripherals, however these > > haven't been upgraded yet). One of the systems (the one with the > > 2940UW2) had been running with CAM patches installed on 2.2.6 through > > 2.2.8 with no problems. > > > > Does anyone have any ideas? > > > > Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 > > Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 > > Open Systems Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca > > ITSD Cy.Schubert@gems8.gov.bc.ca > > Province of BC > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 10 11:11: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F419A15414 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:11:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.1/8.8.8) id LAA14449; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:10:47 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda14444; Wed Mar 10 11:10:26 1999 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.3/8.9.1) id LAA01125; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:10:26 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199903101910.LAA01125@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca> Received: from localhost.osg.gov.bc.ca(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "passer.osg.gov.bc.ca" via SMTP by localhost.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpdDG1121; Wed Mar 10 11:10:14 1999 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE X-Sender: cschuber To: dbushong@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU (David Bushong) Cc: Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr (HERBELOT Thierry), Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: syncing filesystems... giving up In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:37:22 PST." <199903101837.KAA21282@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:10:14 -0800 From: Cy Schubert Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It looks like my patch didn't make it to the list yet (probably still stuck on /var/spool at home after terminating my PPP connection). From what I can tell I get fewer occurrences of "giving up" with the following patch applied. I've submitted to bugs: kern/10528. This patch removes the P_SYSTEM status from MFS when it receives a signal to umount and die. The 2.2.x MFS did not set this bit. --- src/sys/ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c.orig Thu Dec 31 20:14:11 1998 +++ src/sys/ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c Wed Mar 10 11:04:21 1999 @@ -420,11 +420,15 @@ */ if (gotsig) { gotsig = 0; - if (dounmount(mp, 0, p) != 0) + if (dounmount(mp, 0, p) != 0) { + curproc->p_flag |= P_SYSTEM; CLRSIG(p, CURSIG(p)); /* try sleep again.. */ + } } - else if (tsleep((caddr_t)vp, mfs_pri, "mfsidl", 0)) + else if (tsleep((caddr_t)vp, mfs_pri, "mfsidl", 0)) { gotsig++; /* try to unmount in next pass */ + curproc->p_flag &= ~P_SYSTEM; + } } return (0); } Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Open Systems Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca ITSD Cy.Schubert@gems8.gov.bc.ca Province of BC In message <199903101837.KAA21282@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>, David Bushong writes : > Ah HAH! Thanks! Now I know what I changed just before this started > happening to me too (I have an AHA2940UW). I will try putting umount /tmp > in /etc/rc.shutdown, but what's the reason for this problem? I have lots > of memory and like my nice fast /tmp... > > --David Bushong > > > Hello, > > > > One problem was the use of MFS (I had it for /tmp and had the same prob > > with sync) > > > > I don't remember if this was fixed or not. > > > > TfH > > > > > > Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > > > > > > I've managed to convert a couple of systems to 3.1R. Both systems have > > > SCSI controllers, one with 2940UW2, one SCSI hard disk, a SCSI CDROM > > > drive, and 4mm external tape drive the other with a 1542CF, two SCSI > > > hard disks (+ 2 IDE hard disks), SCSI CDROM drive, and a 4mm internal > > > tape drive. In both cases I've noticed that when shutting the systems > > > down (halt or reboot) I get "syncing filesystems... giving up" more > > > frequently (about 75% of reboots) than under 2.x.x (2.0.5 - 2.2.8). > > > Has anyone else noticed this? I haven't used 3.1R on IDE only systems > > > (I have two other systems with only IDE peripherals, however these > > > haven't been upgraded yet). One of the systems (the one with the > > > 2940UW2) had been running with CAM patches installed on 2.2.6 through > > > 2.2.8 with no problems. > > > > > > Does anyone have any ideas? > > > > > > Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 > > > Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 > > > Open Systems Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca > > > ITSD Cy.Schubert@gems8.gov.bc.ca > > > Province of BC > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 10 15: 7:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from aurora.sol.net (aurora.sol.net [206.55.65.76]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D9A14CDF; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:07:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jgreco@aurora.sol.net) Received: (from jgreco@localhost) by aurora.sol.net (8.9.2/8.9.2/SNNS-1.02) id RAA44380; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 17:07:08 -0600 (CST) From: Joe Greco Message-Id: <199903102307.RAA44380@aurora.sol.net> Subject: Re: kern/10411: top, vmstat, iostat show 0% cpu idle & usage on SMP system To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, bob@pmr.com, stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 17:07:08 -0600 (CST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > After installing a MP kernel on my system I have noticed that the various > system utilities that display cpu usage all report 0.0% for everything. > The UP kernel does not have this problem and the MP kernel will work ok > briefly after rebooting, until I apply a load (such as starting X or > building a kernel). I am seeing this problem as well. ASUS P2B-DS, 2 x PII-400/512, disks moved from an HP Vectra XU/200 that worked just fine. I was running a mildly modified 3.0R on the Vectra which reported statistics correctly. Moving these to the P2B-DS broke, for reasons unknown, since I have other P2B-DS's on 3.0R which report statistics fine. I then upgraded the box to 3.1R since I thought maybe my mods were causing the problem, but it is still broken. Oddly, it appears to work fine in single-user, although I didn't play with it for more than a few minutes. More oddly, load average appears to report properly. If any bug whacker would like access to the box in question, it can be arranged easily enough (its a games machine). I'd sure like to see a fix for this. ... Joe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joe Greco - Systems Administrator jgreco@ns.sol.net Solaria Public Access UNIX - Milwaukee, WI 414/342-4847 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 10 15:18:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F18C14C58 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:18:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA13336; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:17:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) From: John Polstra Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) id PAA56028; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:17:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:17:56 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199903102317.PAA56028@vashon.polstra.com> To: billh@directlink.net Subject: Re: make depend fails In-Reply-To: <36E4A672.556FF610@directlink.net> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Cc: stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <36E4A672.556FF610@directlink.net>, Bill Hamilton wrote: > When I do a make depend on cvsup of 3.1 yesterday, I got: > In file included from pam_cleartext_pass_ok.c:33: > /usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_cleartext_pass_ok/../../../../contrib/libpam/libpam/include/security/pam_modules.h:43: > linker_set.h: No such file or directory > mkdep: compile failed > > What caused this? That file is a symbolic link in "/usr/include" pointing to "sys/linker_set.h". You don't have it -- probably because the "make includes" step didn't get run. Just use "make buildworld" or "make world" in "/usr/src", and it should work fine. Typing "make depend" in isolation isn't supported because it can cause this kind of problem. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." -- H. L. Mencken To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 10 16:32:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.bby.com.au (ns.bby.com.au [192.83.119.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9969315060 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 16:32:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by fw.bby.com.au (8.8.8/8.6.9) id LAA18776 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:31:48 +1100 (EST) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au(192.168.71.20) via SMTP by fw.bby.com.au, id smtpd018773; Thu Mar 11 00:31:46 1999 Received: from lightning (lightning [192.168.71.20]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA25315; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:31:44 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <199903110031.LAA25315@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 From: Gregory Bond To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: CVSup for doc files? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:31:44 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've checked the examples but I can't see how to arrange to cvsup the various bits of documentation: - local copy of the handbook - README.html in the ports collection - FAQs etc. the handbook is in /usr/share/doc/handbook but there is no comparable directory /usr/src/share/doc/handbook. Same for the FAQ. The ports READMEs don't seem to be anywhere apart from the initial ports tarball. Is this in fact possible? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 10 17:17:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from maile.telia.com (maile.telia.com [194.22.190.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFA414C3B; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 17:17:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Received: from d1o29.telia.com (root@d1o29.telia.com [194.236.214.241]) by maile.telia.com (8.8.5/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA11869; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 02:17:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from stordatan.telia.com (t4o29p64.telia.com [194.236.215.184]) by d1o29.telia.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA25538; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 02:16:56 +0100 (MET) Received: from partitur.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by stordatan.telia.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA53738; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 02:16:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from girgen@partitur.se) Message-ID: <36E71973.341EA98D@partitur.se> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 02:16:35 +0100 From: Palle Girgensohn Organization: Partitur X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.51 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: sv, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warner Losh Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: panic: aha0 Invalid CCB or SG list References: <36D4B092.8B076D55@partitur.se> <199902252308.QAA04402@harmony.village.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Warner! Sorry to intrude, but I just want to check that I didn't miss any messages in this thread. Have you found anything that might be causing this problem? I think it's related to the 100% CPU utilization while writing full speed to both the ahc2940uw on pci and the 1542CP on isa. I realize this is not the easiest thing to debug; I had to sit and watch the screen for 90 minutes before it happened... Drop me a mail if you find anything. Thanks! /Palle Warner Losh wrote: > > In message <36D4B092.8B076D55@partitur.se> Palle Girgensohn writes: > : I've seen three crashes in the last couple of weeks, with a server > : box that's been running stable as a rock for two years, at least. It > : has an adaptec 2940UW with six disks, and an adaptec 1542CP that's > : connected to a seagate travan tape driver. > > OK. This card is known to be good. At least I've not had any > problems with it. > > : It's running STABLE-3.1 from Feb 19 1999, and since the last > : upgrade, I've seen three crashes, all related to dumping to > : tape. Since I got no info on what happened, I decided to sit down > : with the machine, run a backup sequence to tape, and wait for it to > : possibly crash. After 90 minutes, I was about to give up when > : suddenly, poof: > : panic: aha0 Invalid CCB or SG list. > : > : So, it's probably the 1540 driver (or hardware)? > > Ah. OK. I'm not doing tape stuff on my machine. How fast is that > seagate tr-4 that you are doing? > > : Can anybody shed some light on what to do? Is it software? That's my > : guess, since the machine never ONCE has crashed until the upgrade to > : 3.x. I had one crash when running current form beginning of January > : (soon after moving to 3.x), and now theese three in a week. The 1540 > : has been in the machine for about six months. > > Chances are really good that this is software. The invalid ccb or sg > list is due to either a race condition or something taht corrupts > these things. > > : If there's anything I can do to help debug I'll do it, but device > : drivers are a little above my level of expertise. > > If you can wait a day or three, I might be able to find something that > will help. However, I don't have a tape drive right now to test it > with. I'll see what I can beg, borrow or steal. > > Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 10 20:51:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.bby.com.au (ns.bby.com.au [192.83.119.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C11E15179 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 20:51:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by fw.bby.com.au (8.8.8/8.6.9) id PAA21178 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 15:51:19 +1100 (EST) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au(192.168.71.20) via SMTP by fw.bby.com.au, id smtpd021174; Thu Mar 11 04:51:16 1999 Received: from lightning (lightning [192.168.71.20]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA29601; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 15:51:15 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <199903110451.PAA29601@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 From: Gregory Bond Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: [Summary] Re: CVSup for doc files? In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:31:44 +1100. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 15:51:14 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I said: > I've checked the examples but I can't see how to arrange to cvsup the various > bits of documentation: > - local copy of the handbook > - README.html in the ports collection > - FAQs Thanks to Christopher Hall and William Lloyd for quick answers. For the handbook & FAQ, add "doc-all" to the supfile (or, if you are using the stable-supfile, "doc-all tag=." just like for ports). You can install the latest handbook/FAQ with cd /usr/doc; make FORMATS=html ; make FORMATS=html install but you need to have the sgmlformat package/port and the five or six packages it depends on installed. There is also "www tag=." for the contents of the web page. Neither doc-all or www are mentioned in /usr/share/examples/cvsup (:<) but are mentioned in the handbook in the section under CVSup. The README.hmtl files in ports are manufactured, not cvsuped: cd /usr/ports; make readmes (Clever!) but it currently fails in the japanese/vje-trial port (no Makefile?). Greg. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 10 22:17:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com (ha1.rdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.0.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CED514C8C for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 22:17:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from charon@freethought.org) Received: from c40948-a ([24.1.7.99]) by mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail v4.00.03 201-229-104) with SMTP id <19990311061731.ITKF22357.mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com@c40948-a> for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 22:17:31 -0800 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990310221712.00a2c100@mail> X-Sender: tuathadedanann@mail X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 22:17:12 -0800 To: stable@freebsd.org From: charon@freethought.org Subject: source changes that don't require make world Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In section 12.1 of "making the world your own," he talks about small changes that don't require a 'make world,' but I don't quite get it. For example, I just did a make world and then (I'm using CTM) src-3.0050 came out. I did a ctm on it, and it said which files it changed, but how do I make the changes? The tutorial says, "go to the appropriate sub-directories and make all install" but what is the appropriate sub-directory? For example, one of the changes was to src/release/sysinstall/config.c, but when I went to src/release/sysinstall, 'make all install' didn't work. Thanks, -charon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 10 23:26: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.bby.com.au (ns.bby.com.au [192.83.119.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FEA115200 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 23:25:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by fw.bby.com.au (8.8.8/8.6.9) id SAA23088 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 18:25:34 +1100 (EST) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au(192.168.71.20) via SMTP by fw.bby.com.au, id smtpd023086; Thu Mar 11 07:25:30 1999 Received: from lightning (lightning [192.168.71.20]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA02274; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 18:25:30 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <199903110725.SAA02274@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 From: Gregory Bond To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: acd1: rezero failed Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 18:25:30 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm trying to get an HP 8100 CD-RW happening. It boots & the kernel recognises it fine (dmsg summary attached). Then I try the following sequence: hellcat## wormcontrol -f /dev/acd1a blank hellcat## wormcontrol -f /dev/acd1a prepdisk double dummy hellcat## wormcontrol -f /dev/acd1a track data hellcat## dd if=/home/users/gnb/wp.iso.fs of=/dev/racd1a bs=20k dd: /dev/racd1a: Input/output error This elicits an error on the console: acd1: rezero failed Running /usr/share/examples/atapi/burnaudio or ..../burndata also fails. I can mount & read CD-ROMs & play music CDs on acd1 no problems. Any hints what may be causing this? I'm quite new to the whole CD-R/CD-RW thang so it could well be pilot error..... Greg. Dmesg: wdc1: unit 0 (atapi): , removable, accel, ovlap, dma, iordis acd0: drive speed 5512KB/sec, 128KB cache acd0: supported read types: CD-R, CD-RW, CD-DA, packet track acd0: Audio: play, 16 volume levels acd0: Mechanism: ejectable tray acd0: Medium: CD-ROM 120mm audio disc loaded, unlocked wdc1: unit 1 (atapi): , removable, acc el, dma, iordis acd1: drive speed 4134KB/sec, 1024KB cache acd1: supported read types: CD-R, CD-RW, CD-DA, packet track acd1: supported write types: CD-R, CD-RW, test write acd1: Audio: play, 256 volume levels acd1: Mechanism: ejectable tray acd1: Medium: no/blank disc inside, unlocked To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Mar 10 23:47:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from scientia.demon.co.uk (scientia.demon.co.uk [212.228.14.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E99A1505D for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 23:46:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ben@scientia.demon.co.uk) Received: from scientia.demon.co.uk (ident=ben) by scientia.demon.co.uk with local (Exim 2.12 #2) id 10KuYe-0002IG-00; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 01:46:44 +0000 (envelope-from ben@scientia.demon.co.uk) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 01:46:44 +0000 From: Ben Smithurst To: Gregory Bond Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CVSup for doc files? Message-ID: <19990311014644.C1144@scientia.demon.co.uk> References: <199903110031.LAA25315@lightning.itga.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <199903110031.LAA25315@lightning.itga.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Gregory Bond wrote: > I've checked the examples but I can't see how to arrange to cvsup the various > bits of documentation: > - local copy of the handbook doc-all > - README.html in the ports collection Those aren't in the repository, you need to build them yourself. $ cd /usr/ports $ make readmes (to create all, recursively) $ make readme (just for current directory) > - FAQs The FAQ is also in doc-all collection. -- Ben Smithurst ben@scientia.demon.co.uk send a blank message to ben+pgp@scientia.demon.co.uk for PGP key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 3:51:56 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from krabi.mbp.ee (krabi.mbp.ee [194.204.12.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2044B150A3 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 03:51:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mauri@krabi.mbp.ee) Received: from localhost (mauri@localhost) by krabi.mbp.ee (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA01609 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:51:37 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from mauri@krabi.mbp.ee) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:46:36 +0200 (EET) From: Lauri Laupmaa To: stable@greebsd.org Subject: 3.1 & de0 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi I was installing 3.1 from ftp when I got "de0: autosense failed" and network went off.. is there any known problem with de0 driver ? The second question is: How can i interrupt sysinstall (it is installing ports collection at the moment) so it can finish the installation ? TIA _____________ Lauri Laupmaa ...speaking for myself only... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 6:29: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail-out.visi.com (tele.visi.com [209.98.98.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED9ED1531A for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 06:29:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from veldy@visi.com) Received: from isis.visi.com (isis.visi.com [209.98.98.8]) by mail-out.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91EB11F81D; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 08:28:47 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (veldy@localhost) by isis.visi.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id IAA20354; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 08:28:47 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: isis.visi.com: veldy owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 08:28:47 -0600 (CST) From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: Gregory Bond Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: acd1: rezero failed In-Reply-To: <199903110725.SAA02274@lightning.itga.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Try using acd1c. I don't know why, but acd1a and acd0a never work properly for me either. Tom Veldhouse veldy@visi.com On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Gregory Bond wrote: > I'm trying to get an HP 8100 CD-RW happening. It boots & the kernel > recognises it fine (dmsg summary attached). > > Then I try the following sequence: > > hellcat## wormcontrol -f /dev/acd1a blank > hellcat## wormcontrol -f /dev/acd1a prepdisk double dummy > hellcat## wormcontrol -f /dev/acd1a track data > hellcat## dd if=/home/users/gnb/wp.iso.fs of=/dev/racd1a bs=20k > dd: /dev/racd1a: Input/output error > > This elicits an error on the console: > acd1: rezero failed > > Running /usr/share/examples/atapi/burnaudio or ..../burndata also fails. > > I can mount & read CD-ROMs & play music CDs on acd1 no problems. > > Any hints what may be causing this? I'm quite new to the whole CD-R/CD-RW > thang so it could well be pilot error..... > > Greg. > > Dmesg: > > wdc1: unit 0 (atapi): , removable, accel, ovlap, dma, iordis > acd0: drive speed 5512KB/sec, 128KB cache > acd0: supported read types: CD-R, CD-RW, CD-DA, packet track > acd0: Audio: play, 16 volume levels > acd0: Mechanism: ejectable tray > acd0: Medium: CD-ROM 120mm audio disc loaded, unlocked > wdc1: unit 1 (atapi): , removable, acc > el, dma, iordis > acd1: drive speed 4134KB/sec, 1024KB cache > acd1: supported read types: CD-R, CD-RW, CD-DA, packet track > acd1: supported write types: CD-R, CD-RW, test write > acd1: Audio: play, 256 volume levels > acd1: Mechanism: ejectable tray > acd1: Medium: no/blank disc inside, unlocked > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 6:50: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from teimes.gr (pandora.teimes.gr [194.177.216.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F2B1506D for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 06:49:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from isachpaz@pandora.teimes.gr) Received: from localhost (isachpaz@localhost) by teimes.gr (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA18529 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:47:17 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from isachpaz@pandora.teimes.gr) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:47:17 +0200 (EET) From: Ilias Sachpazidis To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Ports cannot fetch source Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I think that there is a little problem with ports : r412:/usr/ports/misc # cd most r412:/usr/ports/misc/most # make >> most4.8.1.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist on this system. >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://gaia.cs.uoi.gr/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. fetch: illegal option -- A usage: fetch [-DHILMNPRTVablmnpqrstv] [-o outputfile] [-S bytes] [-f file -h host [-c dir] | URL] >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://space.mit.edu/pub/davis/most/. fetch: illegal option -- A usage: fetch [-DHILMNPRTVablmnpqrstv] [-o outputfile] [-S bytes] [-f file -h host [-c dir] | URL] >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.uni-stuttgart.de/pub/unix/misc/slang/most/ . fetch: illegal option -- A usage: fetch [-DHILMNPRTVablmnpqrstv] [-o outputfile] [-S bytes] [-f file -h host [-c dir] | URL] >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://gaia.cs.uoi.gr/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. fetch: illegal option -- A usage: fetch [-DHILMNPRTVablmnpqrstv] [-o outputfile] [-S bytes] [-f file -h host [-c dir] | URL] >> Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this >> port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. regards. Ilias --- Ilias Sachpazidis e-mail: isachpaz@teimes.gr To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 7: 2:14 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDBB14D0F for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 07:02:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.1/8.8.8) id HAA16794; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 07:01:52 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda16790; Thu Mar 11 07:01:31 1999 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.3/8.9.1) id GAA00543; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 06:59:31 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199903111459.GAA00543@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca> Received: from localhost.osg.gov.bc.ca(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "passer.osg.gov.bc.ca" via SMTP by localhost.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpdZTt536; Thu Mar 11 06:58:51 1999 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE X-Sender: cschuber To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group Cc: dbushong@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU (David Bushong), Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr (HERBELOT Thierry), freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: syncing filesystems... giving up In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:10:14 PST." <199903101910.LAA01125@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 06:58:51 -0800 From: Cy Schubert Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Scratch my previous patch, it didn't work. The one below does fix the problem, including the panic caused by files being (very) actively written to MFS at the moment of shutdown. It has been tested on one of my machines at home and a machine here at work. Instead of using the P_SYSTEM flag to avoid swapping MFS it uses P_NOSWAP. --- src/sys/ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c.orig Thu Dec 31 20:14:11 1998 +++ src/sys/ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c Wed Mar 10 21:08:13 1999 @@ -399,7 +399,8 @@ * can we swap out this process - not unless you want a deadlock, * anyway. */ - curproc->p_flag |= P_SYSTEM; + /* curproc->p_flag |= P_SYSTEM; */ + curproc->p_flag |= P_NOSWAP; while (mfsp->mfs_active) { while (bp = bufq_first(&mfsp->buf_queue)) { Any comments? Suggestions? Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Open Systems Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca ITSD Cy.Schubert@gems8.gov.bc.ca Province of BC In message <199903101910.LAA01125@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca>, Cy Schubert writes: > It looks like my patch didn't make it to the list yet (probably > still stuck on /var/spool at home after terminating my PPP > connection). From what I can tell I get fewer occurrences of > "giving up" with the following patch applied. I've submitted to > bugs: kern/10528. > > This patch removes the P_SYSTEM status from MFS when it receives a > signal to umount and die. The 2.2.x MFS did not set this bit. > > --- src/sys/ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c.orig Thu Dec 31 20:14:11 1998 > +++ src/sys/ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c Wed Mar 10 11:04:21 1999 > @@ -420,11 +420,15 @@ > */ > if (gotsig) { > gotsig = 0; > - if (dounmount(mp, 0, p) != 0) > + if (dounmount(mp, 0, p) != 0) { > + curproc->p_flag |= P_SYSTEM; > CLRSIG(p, CURSIG(p)); /* try sleep again.. */ > + } > } > - else if (tsleep((caddr_t)vp, mfs_pri, "mfsidl", 0)) > + else if (tsleep((caddr_t)vp, mfs_pri, "mfsidl", 0)) { > gotsig++; /* try to unmount in next pass */ > + curproc->p_flag &= ~P_SYSTEM; > + } > } > return (0); > } > > > > Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 > Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 > Open Systems Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca > ITSD Cy.Schubert@gems8.gov.bc.ca > Province of BC > > In message <199903101837.KAA21282@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>, David > Bushong writes > : > > Ah HAH! Thanks! Now I know what I changed just before this started > > happening to me too (I have an AHA2940UW). I will try putting umount /tmp > > in /etc/rc.shutdown, but what's the reason for this problem? I have lots > > of memory and like my nice fast /tmp... > > > > --David Bushong > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > One problem was the use of MFS (I had it for /tmp and had the same prob > > > with sync) > > > > > > I don't remember if this was fixed or not. > > > > > > TfH > > > > > > > > > Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: > > > > > > > > I've managed to convert a couple of systems to 3.1R. Both systems have > > > > SCSI controllers, one with 2940UW2, one SCSI hard disk, a SCSI CDROM > > > > drive, and 4mm external tape drive the other with a 1542CF, two SCSI > > > > hard disks (+ 2 IDE hard disks), SCSI CDROM drive, and a 4mm internal > > > > tape drive. In both cases I've noticed that when shutting the systems > > > > down (halt or reboot) I get "syncing filesystems... giving up" more > > > > frequently (about 75% of reboots) than under 2.x.x (2.0.5 - 2.2.8). > > > > Has anyone else noticed this? I haven't used 3.1R on IDE only systems > > > > (I have two other systems with only IDE peripherals, however these > > > > haven't been upgraded yet). One of the systems (the one with the > > > > 2940UW2) had been running with CAM patches installed on 2.2.6 through > > > > 2.2.8 with no problems. > > > > > > > > Does anyone have any ideas? > > > > > > > > Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 > > > > Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 > > > > Open Systems Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca > > > > ITSD Cy.Schubert@gems8.gov.bc.ca > > > Province of BC > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 7: 2:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from math.missouri.edu (math.missouri.edu [128.206.72.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28EED151F9 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 07:02:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from math.missouri.edu (Mizzou-AS10-47.missouri.edu [128.206.209.239]) by math.missouri.edu (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA20760; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 09:00:48 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <36E7DACC.11683826@math.missouri.edu> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 09:01:32 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.1-STABLE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ilias Sachpazidis Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports cannot fetch source References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As far as I can figure, the -A option was added very recently to fetch. If you get a VERY recent version of stable, you will be OK. Ilias Sachpazidis wrote: > > Hi, > > I think that there is a little problem with ports : > > r412:/usr/ports/misc # cd most > > r412:/usr/ports/misc/most # make > >> most4.8.1.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist on this system. > >> Attempting to fetch from > ftp://gaia.cs.uoi.gr/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. > fetch: illegal option -- A > usage: fetch [-DHILMNPRTVablmnpqrstv] [-o outputfile] [-S bytes] > [-f file -h host [-c dir] | URL] > >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://space.mit.edu/pub/davis/most/. > fetch: illegal option -- A > usage: fetch [-DHILMNPRTVablmnpqrstv] [-o outputfile] [-S bytes] > [-f file -h host [-c dir] | URL] > >> Attempting to fetch from > ftp://ftp.uni-stuttgart.de/pub/unix/misc/slang/most/ . > fetch: illegal option -- A > usage: fetch [-DHILMNPRTVablmnpqrstv] [-o outputfile] [-S bytes] > [-f file -h host [-c dir] | URL] > >> Attempting to fetch from > ftp://gaia.cs.uoi.gr/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. > fetch: illegal option -- A > usage: fetch [-DHILMNPRTVablmnpqrstv] [-o outputfile] [-S bytes] > [-f file -h host [-c dir] | URL] > >> Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this > >> port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > > regards. > Ilias > > --- > Ilias Sachpazidis > e-mail: isachpaz@teimes.gr > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Stephen Montgomery-Smith stephen@math.missouri.edu 307 Math Science Building stephen@showme.missouri.edu Department of Mathematics stephen@missouri.edu University of Missouri-Columbia Columbia, MO 65211 USA Phone (573) 882 4540 Fax (573) 882 1869 http://math.missouri.edu/~stephen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 7: 2:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail-out.visi.com (tele.visi.com [209.98.98.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9999E14E93 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 07:02:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from veldy@visi.com) Received: from isis.visi.com (isis.visi.com [209.98.98.8]) by mail-out.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96F01F809; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 09:02:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (veldy@localhost) by isis.visi.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA21608; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 09:02:28 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: isis.visi.com: veldy owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 09:02:28 -0600 (CST) From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: Gregory Bond Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: acd1: rezero failed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Oh. I hate answering myself, but I need to in this case. The base install does not create an acd1 device. You need to go into dev and create it: ./MAKEDEV acd1. That will create the device with a link from wcd1 to acd1. This is probably not necessary, but it keeps the devices up to date. Tom Veldhouse veldy@visi.com On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > Try using acd1c. I don't know why, but acd1a and acd0a never work > properly for me either. > > Tom Veldhouse > veldy@visi.com > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Gregory Bond wrote: > > > I'm trying to get an HP 8100 CD-RW happening. It boots & the kernel > > recognises it fine (dmsg summary attached). > > > > Then I try the following sequence: > > > > hellcat## wormcontrol -f /dev/acd1a blank > > hellcat## wormcontrol -f /dev/acd1a prepdisk double dummy > > hellcat## wormcontrol -f /dev/acd1a track data > > hellcat## dd if=/home/users/gnb/wp.iso.fs of=/dev/racd1a bs=20k > > dd: /dev/racd1a: Input/output error > > > > This elicits an error on the console: > > acd1: rezero failed > > > > Running /usr/share/examples/atapi/burnaudio or ..../burndata also fails. > > > > I can mount & read CD-ROMs & play music CDs on acd1 no problems. > > > > Any hints what may be causing this? I'm quite new to the whole CD-R/CD-RW > > thang so it could well be pilot error..... > > > > Greg. > > > > Dmesg: > > > > wdc1: unit 0 (atapi): , removable, accel, ovlap, dma, iordis > > acd0: drive speed 5512KB/sec, 128KB cache > > acd0: supported read types: CD-R, CD-RW, CD-DA, packet track > > acd0: Audio: play, 16 volume levels > > acd0: Mechanism: ejectable tray > > acd0: Medium: CD-ROM 120mm audio disc loaded, unlocked > > wdc1: unit 1 (atapi): , removable, acc > > el, dma, iordis > > acd1: drive speed 4134KB/sec, 1024KB cache > > acd1: supported read types: CD-R, CD-RW, CD-DA, packet track > > acd1: supported write types: CD-R, CD-RW, test write > > acd1: Audio: play, 256 volume levels > > acd1: Mechanism: ejectable tray > > acd1: Medium: no/blank disc inside, unlocked > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 7:29:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.stack.nl (terra.stack.nl [131.155.140.128]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A7E15058 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 07:29:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcolz@stack.nl) Received: from toad.stack.nl (toad.stack.nl [131.155.140.135]) by mailhost.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAE3334F for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:29:33 +0100 (MET) Received: by toad.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 333) id 116F39675; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:29:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:29:34 +0100 From: Marc Olzheim To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: 2.2.{6,7,8} freeze Message-ID: <19990311162934.A13991@stack.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD toad.stack.nl 2.2.8-STABLE FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE X-URL: http://www.stack.nl/~marcolz/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, This probably has been noted before, but I couldn't find anything about it, so... When running two processes,, each one trying to eat up as much memory as possible, the system deadlocks in the vm-routines. It seems as if the system needs some memory to kill the largest process in the table and it can't get it or something like that. Anyone knows if this has been fixed in 3.* ? The following prog does the job... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- #include #include #include int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { int n = 16 * 1024 * 1024; void *temp; int i; if (argc != 2) { fprintf(stderr, "Usage: %s \n", argv[0]); return(1); } for (i = atoi(argv[1]) - 1; i > 0; i--) fork(); while (n) { temp = calloc(n, 1); if (temp) n <<= 1; else n>>= 1; } sleep(1000); return(0); } To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 7:39:52 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mel.alcatel.fr (mel.alcatel.fr [212.208.74.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C8914D0F for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 07:39:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr) Received: from aifhs2.alcatel.fr (mailhub.alcatel.fr [155.132.180.80]) by mel.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP) with ESMTP id QAA11717; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:37:56 +0100 Received: from lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (lune.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.144.65]) by aifhs2.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP2) with ESMTP id QAA04291; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:35:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from telss1.telspace.alcatel.fr (telss1.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.51.4]) by lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id QAA11884; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:15:10 +0100 (MET) Received: from telspace.alcatel.fr (nairobi.telspace.alcatel.fr) by telss1.telspace.alcatel.fr (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA01184; Thu, 11 Mar 99 16:25:10 +0100 Message-Id: <36E7E191.C2D9F72@telspace.alcatel.fr> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:30:25 +0100 From: HERBELOT Thierry Organization: Alcatel Telspace X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.5.1 sun4m) X-Accept-Language: en Mime-Version: 1.0 To: Ilias Sachpazidis Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ports cannot fetch source References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, -A is a new option to fetch : you must upgrade your world (at least fetch) then : cvsup make world Happy hacking TfH Ilias Sachpazidis wrote: > > Hi, > > I think that there is a little problem with ports : > > r412:/usr/ports/misc # cd most > > r412:/usr/ports/misc/most # make > >> most4.8.1.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist on this system. > >> Attempting to fetch from > ftp://gaia.cs.uoi.gr/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. > fetch: illegal option -- A > usage: fetch [-DHILMNPRTVablmnpqrstv] [-o outputfile] [-S bytes] > [-f file -h host [-c dir] | URL] > >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://space.mit.edu/pub/davis/most/. > fetch: illegal option -- A > usage: fetch [-DHILMNPRTVablmnpqrstv] [-o outputfile] [-S bytes] > [-f file -h host [-c dir] | URL] > >> Attempting to fetch from > ftp://ftp.uni-stuttgart.de/pub/unix/misc/slang/most/ . > fetch: illegal option -- A > usage: fetch [-DHILMNPRTVablmnpqrstv] [-o outputfile] [-S bytes] > [-f file -h host [-c dir] | URL] > >> Attempting to fetch from > ftp://gaia.cs.uoi.gr/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. > fetch: illegal option -- A > usage: fetch [-DHILMNPRTVablmnpqrstv] [-o outputfile] [-S bytes] > [-f file -h host [-c dir] | URL] > >> Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this > >> port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > > regards. > Ilias > > --- > Ilias Sachpazidis > e-mail: isachpaz@teimes.gr > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 7:58: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cerberus.student.umd.edu (cerberus.student.umd.edu [129.2.178.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B79214D0F for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 07:57:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bfoz@cerberus.student.umd.edu) Received: from localhost (bfoz@localhost) by cerberus.student.umd.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id KAA01280; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 10:56:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bfoz@cerberus.student.umd.edu) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 10:56:22 -0500 (EST) From: Brandon Fosdick To: Ilias Sachpazidis Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ports cannot fetch source In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I had the same problem. I did a 'make world' and it went away. -Brandon On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Ilias Sachpazidis wrote: > > Hi, > > I think that there is a little problem with ports : > > r412:/usr/ports/misc # cd most > > r412:/usr/ports/misc/most # make > >> most4.8.1.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist on this system. > >> Attempting to fetch from > ftp://gaia.cs.uoi.gr/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. > fetch: illegal option -- A > usage: fetch [-DHILMNPRTVablmnpqrstv] [-o outputfile] [-S bytes] > [-f file -h host [-c dir] | URL] > >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://space.mit.edu/pub/davis/most/. > fetch: illegal option -- A > usage: fetch [-DHILMNPRTVablmnpqrstv] [-o outputfile] [-S bytes] > [-f file -h host [-c dir] | URL] > >> Attempting to fetch from > ftp://ftp.uni-stuttgart.de/pub/unix/misc/slang/most/ . > fetch: illegal option -- A > usage: fetch [-DHILMNPRTVablmnpqrstv] [-o outputfile] [-S bytes] > [-f file -h host [-c dir] | URL] > >> Attempting to fetch from > ftp://gaia.cs.uoi.gr/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. > fetch: illegal option -- A > usage: fetch [-DHILMNPRTVablmnpqrstv] [-o outputfile] [-S bytes] > [-f file -h host [-c dir] | URL] > >> Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this > >> port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > > > regards. > Ilias > > --- > Ilias Sachpazidis > e-mail: isachpaz@teimes.gr > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 7:58:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from isdn.com.tw (isdn.com.tw [202.145.222.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1211F15315 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 07:57:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from aleck@isdn.com.tw) Received: (qmail 26310 invoked by uid 7771); 11 Mar 1999 15:57:16 -0000 Received: from ts1-p5.isdn.com.tw (HELO isdn.com.tw) (202.145.222.205) by isdn.com.tw with SMTP; 11 Mar 1999 15:57:16 -0000 Message-ID: <36E7E7DC.22602A75@isdn.com.tw> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 23:57:16 +0800 From: Aleck Chen Organization: Homeyen Computer Co., Ltd. X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: zh-TW,en-US,ja,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: (no subject) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG subscribe freebsd-stable subscribe cvs-all To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 8:30:44 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from parmesan.dowcarter.com (dns1.dowcarter.com [195.188.170.202]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31747151E5 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 08:30:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmd@parmesan.dowcarter.com) Received: (from jmd@localhost) by parmesan.dowcarter.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA01863 for stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:32:12 GMT Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:32:12 +0000 From: John Dow To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports cannot fetch source Message-ID: <19990311163212.H1768@dowcarter.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: ; from Brandon Fosdick on Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 10:56:22AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 10:56:22AM -0500, Brandon Fosdick wrote: > I had the same problem. I did a 'make world' and it went away. > -Brandon Sounds like the version of fetch is out of sync with the version mentioned in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk Just edit the .mk file, and change the flags - it's obviously the -A that's causing the make to fail. I encountered this problem first time I synced the ports collection after installing 2.2.8. J -- John M Dow - Director, Systems Dow Carter Ltd : Edinburgh, Scotland : http://www.dowcarter.com corner (kor-ner) (n): Something for putting manhole covers on To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 9:24:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from nmail.devrycols.edu (nmail.devrycols.edu [199.218.238.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 017FB14D6E for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 09:24:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jm7996@devrycols.edu) Received: from cis070 [131.187.253.210] by nmail.devrycols.edu (SMTPD32-4.07) id AC1CE4301EA; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 12:23:40 EST Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990311122434.007d9b90@devrycols.edu> X-Sender: jm7996@devrycols.edu X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Light Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 12:24:34 -0500 To: Ilias Sachpazidis , stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: "James A. Mutter" Subject: Re: Ports cannot fetch source In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 04:47 PM 3/11/99 +0200, Ilias Sachpazidis wrote: > >Hi, > >I think that there is a little problem with ports : > >r412:/usr/ports/misc # cd most > >r412:/usr/ports/misc/most # make >>> most4.8.1.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist on this system. >>> Attempting to fetch from >ftp://gaia.cs.uoi.gr/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. >fetch: illegal option -- A You'll need to edit /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk Change the line that says something like this: ?FETCH_CMD="-A" to ?FETCH_CMD="-a" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 10: 0:24 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from polaris.we.lc.ehu.es (polaris.we.lc.ehu.es [158.227.6.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1769E150A6 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 09:58:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jose@we.lc.ehu.es) Received: from we.lc.ehu.es (garatu [158.227.6.222]) by polaris.we.lc.ehu.es (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA23997; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 18:56:48 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <36E803E0.4681C198@we.lc.ehu.es> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 18:56:48 +0100 From: "Jose M. Alcaide" Organization: Universidad del Pais Vasco - Dept. de Electricidad y Electronica X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ilias Sachpazidis Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ports cannot fetch source References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ilias Sachpazidis wrote: > > Hi, > > I think that there is a little problem with ports : > > r412:/usr/ports/misc # cd most > > r412:/usr/ports/misc/most # make > >> most4.8.1.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist on this system. > >> Attempting to fetch from > ftp://gaia.cs.uoi.gr/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. > fetch: illegal option -- A Just in case that you don't want to remake the world, install the package 31upgrade-1999.03.08.tgz from ftp.freebsd.org. -- JMA ----------------------------------------------------------------------- José Mª Alcaide | mailto:jose@we.lc.ehu.es Universidad del País Vasco | mailto:jmas@es.FreeBSD.ORG Dpto. de Electricidad y Electrónica | http://www.we.lc.ehu.es/~jose Facultad de Ciencias - Campus de Lejona | Tel.: +34-946012479 48940 Lejona (Vizcaya) - SPAIN | Fax: +34-944858139 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Go ahead... make my day." - H. Callahan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 10:34:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk [193.237.89.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCFD1520E for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 10:34:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk) Received: (from nik@localhost) by nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA27138; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 18:33:49 GMT (envelope-from nik) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 18:33:49 +0000 From: Nik Clayton To: charon@freethought.org Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: source changes that don't require make world Message-ID: <19990311183349.A26299@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> References: <3.0.5.32.19990310221712.00a2c100@mail> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19990310221712.00a2c100@mail>; from charon@freethought.org on Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 10:17:12PM -0800 Organization: Nik at home, where there's nothing going on Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Mar 10, 1999 at 10:17:12PM -0800, charon@freethought.org wrote: > In section 12.1 of "making the world your own," he talks about small > changes that don't require a 'make world,' but I don't quite get it. Ah ha. I assume that the "he" in this case is me. > For example, I just did a make world and then (I'm using CTM) src-3.0050 came > out. I did a ctm on it, and it said which files it changed, but how do I > make the changes? The tutorial says, "go to the appropriate > sub-directories and make all install" but what is the appropriate > sub-directory? For example, one of the changes was to > src/release/sysinstall/config.c, but when I went to src/release/sysinstall, > 'make all install' didn't work. Thanks, Works over here. What's the problem you're getting? N -- Bagel: The carbohydrate with the hole To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 11: 2:17 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peloton.physics.montana.edu (peloton.physics.montana.edu [153.90.192.177]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE39215049 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:02:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu) Received: from localhost (brett@localhost) by peloton.physics.montana.edu (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA07382; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 12:01:14 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 12:01:14 -0700 (MST) From: Brett Taylor To: Brandon Fosdick Cc: Ilias Sachpazidis , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ports cannot fetch source In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Brandon Fosdick wrote: > I had the same problem. I did a 'make world' and it went away. It's far easier to just grab the correct port_update package. Go to: http://www.freebsd.org/ports/ and grab the one pertinent to your system. Brett *********************************************************** Brett Taylor brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu * brett@daemonnews.org * * http://www.daemonnews.org/ * *********************************************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 11:14:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72C6314E71; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:14:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA18212; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:13:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) id LAA58111; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:13:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <199903080913.JAA00787@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:13:48 -0800 (PST) Organization: Polstra & Co., Inc. From: John Polstra To: Brian Somers Subject: Re: rc.network->rc.firewall->natd Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, peter@FreeBSD.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brian Somers wrote: >> > Any chance of a repository copy of src/usr.sbin/natd to src/sbin/natd >> > (peter & jdp cc'd) ? If it's moved, I'll shift the loading. >> >> Sorry, I won't have time to do it until next week. Maybe Peter will >> have time sooner than that. If next week comes along and it hasn't >> been done yet, give me a holler. > > Any chance of doing this now ? The rc files don't use a full path > name, so it shouldn't cause any problems at all. OK, I'll do the repository copy later today, and let you know when it's done. Once the copy has been made, you should fix up the Makefiles, etc., and "cvs rm" the files from "src/usr.sbin/natd" on the main branch. > It's probably best to do it for all branches rather than just for > -current. The way it works with a repository copy is that we remove the tags first. So the new copy will spring into existence in -current only. If you want the move to affect other branches, you have to manually "cvs add" it on those branches. I'll give you more specific instructions if/when you're ready. The goal here is not to rewrite history; i.e., no retroactive changes are allowed. But it shouldn't be done except in -current for at least a week or two. Current is for working out any unforseen problems first. After it's been proven OK in -current, then you could put it into RELENG_3. I don't think you should touch it in any of the other branches. John --- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Self-interest is the aphrodisiac of belief." -- James V. DeLong To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 13:12: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from phoenix.volant.org (phoenix.volant.org [205.179.79.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE15014F2D for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:12:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from patl@phoenix.volant.org) Received: from asimov.phoenix.volant.org ([205.179.79.65]) by phoenix.volant.org with smtp (Exim 1.92 #8) id 10LCk4-0004mH-00; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:11:44 -0800 Received: from localhost by asimov.phoenix.volant.org (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id NAA03437; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:11:39 -0800 Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:11:39 -0800 (PST) From: patl@phoenix.volant.org Reply-To: patl@phoenix.volant.org Subject: Re: Ports cannot fetch source To: "Jose M. Alcaide" Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <36E803E0.4681C198@we.lc.ehu.es> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Ilias Sachpazidis wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I think that there is a little problem with ports : > > > > r412:/usr/ports/misc # cd most > > > > r412:/usr/ports/misc/most # make > > >> most4.8.1.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist on this system. > > >> Attempting to fetch from > > ftp://gaia.cs.uoi.gr/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. > > fetch: illegal option -- A > > Just in case that you don't want to remake the world, install > the package 31upgrade-1999.03.08.tgz from ftp.freebsd.org. Nice theory; but the 31upgrade port doesn't actually install anything. The DISTFILES is '# empty'; and there's a .if that issues a BROKEN if you aren't building packages. (Unless it's been fixed since the wee hours of this morning.) -Pat To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 13:15:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com (ha1.rdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.0.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B796915246 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:15:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from charon@freethought.org) Received: from c40948-a ([24.1.7.99]) by mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail v4.00.03 201-229-104) with SMTP id <19990311211459.NXQK22357.mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com@c40948-a>; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:14:59 -0800 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990311131436.00a445b0@mail> X-Sender: tuathadedanann@mail X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:14:36 -0800 To: Nik Clayton From: charon@freethought.org Subject: Re: source changes that don't require make world Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <19990311183349.A26299@catkin.nothing-going-on.org> References: <3.0.5.32.19990310221712.00a2c100@mail> <3.0.5.32.19990310221712.00a2c100@mail> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 06:33 PM 3/11/99 +0000, Nik Clayton wrote: >> For example, I just did a make world and then (I'm using CTM) src-3.0050 came >> out. I did a ctm on it, and it said which files it changed, but how do I >> make the changes? The tutorial says, "go to the appropriate >> sub-directories and make all install" but what is the appropriate >> sub-directory? For example, one of the changes was to >> src/release/sysinstall/config.c, but when I went to src/release/sysinstall, >> 'make all install' didn't work. Thanks, > >Works over here. What's the problem you're getting? hmmm... I just rebooted this morning and tried it again, and it worked this time... *sigh* whatever! Thanks anyway. -charon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 13:45:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from outreach.wolfnet.org (outreach.wolfnet.org [207.173.133.202]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB1914F82 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:45:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkf@wolfnet.org) Received: from outreach.wolfnet.org ([207.173.133.202]) by outreach.wolfnet.org with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 10LDGC-000Pzw-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:44:56 -0800 Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:44:56 -0800 (PST) From: "Jason K. Fritcher" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Scsi problem Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello. I am having an unusual problem with a new system I have. I have installed the 3.1-19990227-STABLE snapshot. If I boot the system with a power-cycle, or use the reset button to reset the machine, it boots normally. If the machine reboots from any kind of soft-boot, the machine locks hard with no error messages after the machine attempts to probe the scsi bus for devices. The only way to reboot the machine afterwards is reset. I am thinking this is a driver problem, since I can reboot the machine all I want under Windows 95 and everything works flawlessly. I have gone through the archives for -hackers, -stable, -current, and -scsi and could not find any relevent subject lines. If this message would be better served in -scsi, I can move it there. This is the hardware in the machine. All three ports for the on-board scsi are terminated, and in the BIOS for the motherboard, auto termination is enabled for all buses. Asus P2B-LS motherboard, BIOS v1008, was at 1006 w/ same problem. On-board AIC-7890 + 3860 bridge, BIOS v2.01 Quantum Viking II 9.1GB Hard drive in U2-LVD mode - ID 0 Plextor Ultraplex 40x CDROM - ID 6 On-board Intel 10/100MB Ethernet Asus 3400TNT AGP Video card Thanx for the help. -- Jason K. Fritcher jkf@wolfnet.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 13:58:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from phoenix.volant.org (phoenix.volant.org [205.179.79.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38141526A for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:58:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from patl@phoenix.volant.org) Received: from asimov.phoenix.volant.org ([205.179.79.65]) by phoenix.volant.org with smtp (Exim 1.92 #8) id 10LDSt-0005Ay-00; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:58:03 -0800 Received: from localhost by asimov.phoenix.volant.org (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id NAA05598; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:58:00 -0800 Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 13:57:59 -0800 (PST) From: patl@phoenix.volant.org Reply-To: patl@phoenix.volant.org Subject: Re: Ports cannot fetch source To: "Jose M. Alcaide" Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Ilias Sachpazidis wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I think that there is a little problem with ports : > > > > > > r412:/usr/ports/misc # cd most > > > > > > r412:/usr/ports/misc/most # make > > > >> most4.8.1.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist on this system. > > > >> Attempting to fetch from > > > ftp://gaia.cs.uoi.gr/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/. > > > fetch: illegal option -- A > > > > Just in case that you don't want to remake the world, install > > the package 31upgrade-1999.03.08.tgz from ftp.freebsd.org. > > Nice theory; but the 31upgrade port doesn't actually install anything. > The DISTFILES is '# empty'; and there's a .if that issues a BROKEN > if you aren't building packages. (Unless it's been fixed since the > wee hours of this morning.) Oops. Momentary port/package confusion. (These things sometimes happen when I'm trying to do six things at once and haven't had lunch, or even breakfast, yet.) Of course you need to install the PACKAGE, not the PORT. Although, come to think of it, why couldn't the port just fetch and install the package? -Pat To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 14:41:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from awfulhak.org (awfulhak.force9.co.uk [195.166.136.63]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD48152B9; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 14:40:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (keep.lan.Awfulhak.org [172.16.0.8]) by awfulhak.org (8.9.2/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA13982; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 22:10:52 GMT (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA00721; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 19:47:19 GMT (envelope-from brian@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199903111947.TAA00721@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: John Polstra Cc: Brian Somers , jdp@freebsd.org, peter@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Juriy Goloveshkin Subject: Re: rc.network->rc.firewall->natd In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 08 Feb 1999 10:23:51 PST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 19:47:19 +0000 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Any chance of a repository copy of src/usr.sbin/natd to src/sbin/natd > > (peter & jdp cc'd) ? If it's moved, I'll shift the loading. > > Sorry, I won't have time to do it until next week. Maybe Peter will > have time sooner than that. If next week comes along and it hasn't > been done yet, give me a holler. AAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH ;-) Thanks. > John > --- > John Polstra jdp@polstra.com > John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA > "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." > -- H. L. Mencken -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 14:48:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from awfulhak.org (awfulhak.force9.co.uk [195.166.136.63]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB7A1525F; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 14:48:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (keep.lan.Awfulhak.org [172.16.0.8]) by awfulhak.org (8.9.2/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA15822; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 22:48:04 GMT (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keep.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA01722; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 22:47:34 GMT (envelope-from brian@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <199903112247.WAA01722@keep.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: John Polstra Cc: Brian Somers , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, peter@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: rc.network->rc.firewall->natd In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 11 Mar 1999 11:13:48 PST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 22:47:34 +0000 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ok, I understand all that - thanks. There are lots of libalias/natd changes that haven't been brought back into RELENG_3 yet, so I'll sit on them for a few weeks more and do the RELENG_3 ``cvs add'' at that point. I'd tend not to update RELENG_3 at all, but I suspect that'd cause too much confusion with the rc.conf stuff :-( > Brian Somers wrote: > >> > Any chance of a repository copy of src/usr.sbin/natd to src/sbin/natd > >> > (peter & jdp cc'd) ? If it's moved, I'll shift the loading. > >> > >> Sorry, I won't have time to do it until next week. Maybe Peter will > >> have time sooner than that. If next week comes along and it hasn't > >> been done yet, give me a holler. > > > > Any chance of doing this now ? The rc files don't use a full path > > name, so it shouldn't cause any problems at all. > > OK, I'll do the repository copy later today, and let you know when > it's done. Once the copy has been made, you should fix up the > Makefiles, etc., and "cvs rm" the files from "src/usr.sbin/natd" on > the main branch. > > > It's probably best to do it for all branches rather than just for > > -current. > > The way it works with a repository copy is that we remove the tags > first. So the new copy will spring into existence in -current > only. If you want the move to affect other branches, you have to > manually "cvs add" it on those branches. I'll give you more specific > instructions if/when you're ready. The goal here is not to rewrite > history; i.e., no retroactive changes are allowed. > > But it shouldn't be done except in -current for at least a week or > two. Current is for working out any unforseen problems first. After > it's been proven OK in -current, then you could put it into RELENG_3. > I don't think you should touch it in any of the other branches. > > John > --- > John Polstra jdp@polstra.com > John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA > "Self-interest is the aphrodisiac of belief." -- James V. DeLong > > -- Brian Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 16:59:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dukat.noc.cup.ndp.net (dukat.noc.cup.ndp.net [209.212.224.149]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD8114F4F for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:59:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andym@ntt.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.noc.cup.ndp.net [127.0.0.1]) by dukat.noc.cup.ndp.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id QAA99314 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:59:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andym@ntt.net) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 16:59:00 -0800 (PST) From: Andy McConnell To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: brooktree848.c and bt848_i2c.c dependency problem Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-2022-JP Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG After upgrading to 3.1, fetching latest src (cvsup last night) and doing a make world, I can't recompile the kernel with 'device bktr0' It reports the following failures on `make depend` ../../pci/brooktree848.c:399: smbus_if.h: No such file or directory ../../pci/brooktree848.c:400: iicbus_if.h: No such file or directory ../../pci/bt848_i2c.c:61: iicbb_if.h: No such file or directory ../../pci/bt848_i2c.c:62: smbus_if.h: No such file or directory mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1 I tried a `find /usr/src -name smbus_if*` and similar for the others, and found only this: /usr/src/sys/dev/smbus/smbus_if.m /usr/src/sys/dev/iicbus/iicbus_if.m /usr/src/sys/dev/iicbus/iicbb_if.m Any clues where the .h files have gone? Any clues on how to patch the brooktree drivers to use the .m files instead? -Andy -- Andy McConnell $B??8~N}(B $B0BEHN6(B NTT America IP Headquarters "and now I saw, tho' too late, the Folly of beginning a Work before we count the Cost; and before we judge rightly of our own Strength to go through with it." -- Defoe from Robinson Crusoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 19:13:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from grizzly.fas.com (cc69528-a.mtpls1.sc.home.com [24.6.61.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1E115210 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 19:12:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stanb@awod.com) Received: by grizzly.fas.com ($Revision: 1.37.109.23 $/16.2) id AA203718357; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 22:12:37 -0500 Subject: Help with gnomecontrlcenter port To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Stable Mailing List) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 22:12:37 -0500 (EST) From: "Stan Brown" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 977 Message-Id: <19990312031259.5C1E115210@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Now that gnome is at 1.0, and I have a nice new laptop, I decided to see what all the fuss is about. Not knowing too much about gnome, but having a lot of faith in the FreeBSD ports, I decided to pick a random gnome port and build it. Trusting that the ports mechainism would take care of all those ugly dependinces for me. Well no such luck. Aftre resolving _a lot_ of needed items this port finaly dies for lack of a shred libray called gdk_inlib.2. What port do I need to bbuild to get this library? -- Stan Brown stanb@netcom.com 843-745-3154 Westvaco Charleston SC. -- Windows 98: n. useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. - (c) 1999 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 19:32:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.bby.com.au (ns.bby.com.au [192.83.119.129]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEDF14C08 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 19:32:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by fw.bby.com.au (8.8.8/8.6.9) id OAA03640 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:31:44 +1100 (EST) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au(192.168.71.20) via SMTP by fw.bby.com.au, id smtpd003636; Fri Mar 12 03:31:34 1999 Received: from lightning (lightning [192.168.71.20]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA13213; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:31:34 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <199903120331.OAA13213@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 From: Gregory Bond To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: acd1: rezero failed In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 11 Mar 1999 18:25:30 +1100. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:31:34 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hmm. Curiouser and curiouser. Hans Drexler has an 8100 that works fine for him, but for me it fails in the rezero. I turned on debugging in atapi.c and got the following dmesg output which seems to indicate that the the rezero command is not supported by the HP. the error message is coming from acdopen() which does a rezero (but only if the open is not O_NONBLOCK?!?) Anyone got any clues how I can track this down? Soren are you listening? hellcat$ ident /sys/i386/isa/atapi-cd.? /sys/i386/isa/atapi-cd.c: $Id: atapi-cd.c,v 1.7 1999/01/02 17:11:45 hoek Exp $ /sys/i386/isa/atapi-cd.h: $Id: atapi-cd.h,v 1.2 1998/10/15 08:11:55 sos Exp $ hellcat$ Greg. wdc0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7 irq 14 on isa wdc0: unit 0 (wd0): , DMA, 32-bit, multi-block-16 wd0: 4104MB (8405775 sectors), 8895 cyls, 15 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S wdc0: unit 1 (wd1): , DMA, 32-bit, multi-block-16 wd1: 6149MB (12594960 sectors), 13328 cyls, 15 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S wdc1 at 0x170-0x177 irq 15 on isa atapi1.0 at 0x170: attach called wdc1: unit 0 (atapi): , removable, accel, ovlap, dma, iordis atapi10: info c0-85-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0- 0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-3-0-0-1-0-0-32-2e-30-43-0-0-0-0-43-44-2d-35-33-32-45-2d-41-0-0-0 -0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-2f-0-0-0-2-0- 2-2-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-7-0-7-4-3-0-78-0-78-0-b4-0-78-0-0-0-0-0-5e -1-0-0-0-0 atapi1.0: req im 5a-0-2a-0-0-0-0-0-1c-0-0-0-0-0-0-0 len=28 atapi1.0: start atapi1.0: send cmd MODE_SENSE 5a-0-2a-0-0-0-0-0-1c-0-0-0-0-0-0-0 atapi1.0: intr ireason=0x2, len=28, status=58, error=0 atapi1.0: intr ireason=0x3, len=28, status=50, error=0 acd0: drive speed 5512KB/sec, 128KB cache acd0: supported read types: CD-R, CD-RW, CD-DA, packet track acd0: Audio: play, 16 volume levels acd0: Mechanism: ejectable tray acd0: Medium: no/blank disc inside, unlocked atapi10: cap 0-1a-70-0-0-0-0-0-2a-12-7-0-71-73-29-3-d-16-10-0-80-0-d-16-0-0-0-0 atapi1.1 at 0x170: attach called wdc1: unit 1 (atapi): , removable, acc el, dma, iordis atapi11: info c0-85-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-59-4d-57-33-37-35-43-37- 36-4c-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-31-2e-30-67-0-0-0-0-48-65-77-6c-65-74-74-2 d-50-61-63-6b-61-72-64-20-43-44-2d-57-72-69-74-65-72-20-50-6c-75-73-20-38-31-30- 30-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-f-0-0-0-3-0-2-2-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-7-0-3-2 -1-0-96-0-96-0-b4-0-b4-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0 atapi1.1: req im 5a-0-2a-0-0-0-0-0-1c-0-0-0-0-0-0-0 len=28 atapi1.1: start atapi1.1: send cmd MODE_SENSE 5a-0-2a-0-0-0-0-0-1c-0-0-0-0-0-0-0 atapi1.1: intr ireason=0x2, len=28, status=58, error=0 atapi1.1: intr ireason=0x3, len=28, status=50, error=0 acd1: drive speed 4134KB/sec, 1024KB cache acd1: supported read types: CD-R, CD-RW, CD-DA, packet track acd1: supported write types: CD-R, CD-RW, test write acd1: Audio: play, 256 volume levels acd1: Mechanism: ejectable tray acd1: Medium: CD-RW 120mm data disc loaded, unlocked atapi11: cap 0-1c-21-0-0-0-0-0-2a-14-7-7-71-63-29-23-8a-10-0-1-0-4-8a-10-0-0-2-c 2 Then when I attempt to open for write: atapi1.1: start atapi1.1: send cmd PREVENT_ALLOW 1e-0-0-0-1-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0 atapi1.1: intr ireason=0x3, len=0, status=50, error=0 atapi1.1: req w 1-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0 len=0 atapi1.1: start atapi1.1: send cmd REZERO_UNIT 1-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0 atapi1.1: intr ireason=0x3, len=0, status=51, error=54 atapi1:1: illegal request acd1: rezero failed atapi1.1: req w 1-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0 len=0 atapi1.1: start atapi1.1: send cmd REZERO_UNIT 1-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0 atapi1.1: intr ireason=0x3, len=0, status=51, error=54 atapi1:1: illegal request acd1: rezero failed To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 19:41:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cerebus.nectar.com (nectar-gw.nectar.com [204.0.249.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4EF14CA9 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 19:41:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@nectar.com) Received: (from smap@localhost) by cerebus.nectar.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id VAA12229; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 21:41:19 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nectar@nectar.com) Received: from spawn.nectar.com(10.0.0.101) by cerebus.nectar.com via smap (V2.1) id xma012227; Thu, 11 Mar 99 21:40:55 -0600 Received: from spawn.nectar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spawn.nectar.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA34504; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 21:40:55 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nectar@spawn.nectar.com) Message-Id: <199903120340.VAA34504@spawn.nectar.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 X-PGP-RSAfprint: 00 F9 E6 A2 C5 4D 0A 76 26 8B 8B 57 73 D0 DE EE X-PGP-RSAkey: http://www.nectar.com/nectar-pgp262.txt From: Jacques Vidrine In-reply-to: <19990312031259.5C1E115210@hub.freebsd.org> References: <19990312031259.5C1E115210@hub.freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Help with gnomecontrlcenter port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: "Stan Brown" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Stable Mailing List) Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 21:40:55 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yes, it is hairy. You must mean gdk_imlib.2, correct? You probably have old versions of libraries that the various GNOME pieces depend upon. Make sure that you rebuild them all. Check the *_DEPENDS stuff in the Makefiles for exact dependencies, but here are some off the top of my head: glib12 gtk12 imlib ORBit libaudiofile libghttp libgtop Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / nectar@FreeBSD.org On 11 March 1999 at 22:12, "Stan Brown" wrote: > Now that gnome is at 1.0, and I have a nice new laptop, I decided to > see what all the fuss is about. Not knowing too much about gnome, but > having a lot of faith in the FreeBSD ports, I decided to pick a random > gnome port and build it. Trusting that the ports mechainism would take > care of all those ugly dependinces for me. > > Well no such luck. Aftre resolving _a lot_ of needed items this port > finaly dies for lack of a shred libray called gdk_inlib.2. > > What port do I need to bbuild to get this library? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Mar 11 20:24:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from usgs.gov (igsmn002.wr.usgs.gov [130.118.41.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 80F9514F76 for ; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 20:24:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rsowders@usgs.gov) Received: from IGSMN-Message_Server by usgs.gov with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 11 Mar 1999 20:24:20 -0800 Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise 5.2 Date: Thu, 11 Mar 1999 20:23:42 -0800 From: "Robert Sowders" To: Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr, Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: syncing filesystems... giving up Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I also noticed this behavior after I moved /tmp to MFS, this is the line = from my fstab /dev/wd0s2b /tmp mfs = rw,-s=3D100000,nodev,noexec 0 0=20 after this I occassionally get a dirty buffers, or pages message then the = system gives up on it=20 and reboots. please excuse the formatting. >>> HERBELOT Thierry 3/10/99 12:27:06 AM >>> Hello, One problem was the use of MFS (I had it for /tmp and had the same prob with sync) I don't remember if this was fixed or not. TfH Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: >=20 > I've managed to convert a couple of systems to 3.1R. Both systems have > SCSI controllers, one with 2940UW2, one SCSI hard disk, a SCSI CDROM > drive, and 4mm external tape drive the other with a 1542CF, two SCSI > hard disks (+ 2 IDE hard disks), SCSI CDROM drive, and a 4mm internal > tape drive. In both cases I've noticed that when shutting the systems > down (halt or reboot) I get "syncing filesystems... giving up" more > frequently (about 75% of reboots) than under 2.x.x (2.0.5 - 2.2.8). > Has anyone else noticed this? I haven't used 3.1R on IDE only systems > (I have two other systems with only IDE peripherals, however these > haven't been upgraded yet). One of the systems (the one with the > 2940UW2) had been running with CAM patches installed on 2.2.6 through > 2.2.8 with no problems. >=20 > Does anyone have any ideas? >=20 > Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 > Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 > Open Systems Group Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca=20 > ITSD Cy.Schubert@gems8.gov.bc.ca=20 > Province of BC >=20 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org=20 > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org=20 with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 0:11: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from voyage.coolfitch.ie (pooh.elsevier.nl [145.36.9.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20D214E3B for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 00:10:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steveo@iol.ie) Received: from voyage.coolfitch.ie (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by voyage.coolfitch.ie (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id IAA69473; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:06:42 GMT (envelope-from steveo@iol.ie) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <19990312031259.5C1E115210@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:06:39 -0000 (GMT) From: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" To: Stan Brown Subject: RE: Help with gnomecontrlcenter port Cc: (FreeBSD Stable Mailing List) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 12-Mar-99 Stan Brown wrote: > > What port do I need to bbuild to get this library? x11/gnome is the meta port for the whole shebang. I'm still trying to figure out what the fuss is about, so far it looks like a lot of code for not much result (surely I'm missing something). ---------------------------------- E-Mail: Steve O'Hara-Smith Date: 12-Mar-99 Time: 08:04:45 This message was sent by XFMail ---------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 1:39:55 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from polaris.we.lc.ehu.es (polaris.we.lc.ehu.es [158.227.6.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638341545F for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 01:39:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jose@we.lc.ehu.es) Received: from we.lc.ehu.es (garatu [158.227.6.222]) by polaris.we.lc.ehu.es (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA26149; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:37:19 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <36E8E04E.C92474F9@we.lc.ehu.es> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:37:18 +0100 From: "Jose M. Alcaide" Organization: Universidad del Pais Vasco - Dept. de Electricidad y Electronica X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stan Brown Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Subject: Re: Help with gnomecontrlcenter port References: <19990312031259.5C1E115210@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Stan Brown wrote: > > Now that gnome is at 1.0, and I have a nice new laptop, I decided to > see what all the fuss is about. Not knowing too much about gnome, but > having a lot of faith in the FreeBSD ports, I decided to pick a random > gnome port and build it. Trusting that the ports mechainism would take > care of all those ugly dependinces for me. > > Well no such luck. Aftre resolving _a lot_ of needed items this port > finaly dies for lack of a shred libray called gdk_inlib.2. > > What port do I need to bbuild to get this library? Probably you have an old version of GTK/Glib installed. Uninstall them, and rebuild the new GTK 1.2. -- JMA ----------------------------------------------------------------------- José Mª Alcaide | mailto:jose@we.lc.ehu.es Universidad del País Vasco | mailto:jmas@es.FreeBSD.ORG Dpto. de Electricidad y Electrónica | http://www.we.lc.ehu.es/~jose Facultad de Ciencias - Campus de Lejona | Tel.: +34-946012479 48940 Lejona (Vizcaya) - SPAIN | Fax: +34-944858139 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Go ahead... make my day." - H. Callahan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 2:13:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from netrinsics.com (unknown [210.74.177.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC463150BD for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 02:12:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robinson@netrinsics.com) Received: (from robinson@localhost) by netrinsics.com (8.9.2/8.8.7) id SAA34681; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 18:07:54 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from robinson) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 18:07:54 +0800 (CST) From: Michael Robinson Message-Id: <199903121007.SAA34681@netrinsics.com> To: stanb@awod.com, steveo@iol.ie Subject: RE: Help with gnomecontrlcenter port Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Steve O'Hara-Smith" writes: > x11/gnome is the meta port for the whole shebang. I'm still trying to >figure out what the fuss is about, so far it looks like a lot of code for not >much result (surely I'm missing something). Mostly it's goodies for developers at this point (e.g., if you want to bang together a quicky GUI app, there's no quicker way than using the Python Gnome/GTK+ bindings). Down the road, there will be a robust draggable, droppable, all interoperable personal productivity environment ala Microsoft. For now, you can try playing with gnumeric. -Michael Robinson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 4:31:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from out0.mx.skynet.be (out0.mx.skynet.be [195.238.2.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77AB3152A6; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 04:30:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blk@foxbert.skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by out0.mx.skynet.be (8.9.3/odie-relay-v1.0) with SMTP id NAA18766; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 13:30:21 +0100 (MET) X-Mailer: CTM PowerMail 2.3.1 X-URL: http://www.skynet.be x-sender: blk@foxbert.skynet.be Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 13:30:24 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Brad Knowles Subject: Vinum questions? Message-Id: <19990312133024.005687@relay.skynet.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Folks, Okay, so I have now torn down the Solaris 2.6/x86 anonymous ftp server that I was working on, and have put FreeBSD 3.1-stable on it instead. I'm now trying to get vinum working correctly, so that I can have my disk partitions back (I guess I should also get ssh installed on there, because right now I'm going to have to manually re-type all the vinum information ;-). Anyway, the one hurdle I'm trying to get over at the moment is that vinum thinks that the devices /dev/da1c through /dev/da9c do not exist (they do -- I created them with MAKEDEV), and therefore it refuses to start the disks d1 through d9. Without those disks, of course neither of the two plexes start up, and of course the volume fails to start as well. Any suggestions? Oh, BTW -- I think I'm on the freebsd-stable list, but not the freebsd-questions list, so if you'd make sure that either my personal e-mail address or that of the freebsd-stable list is included in all replies, I'd appreciate it. Thanks! -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ____________________________________________________________________ |o| Brad Knowles, Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o| |o| Systems Architect, News/mail/FTP Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o| |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.11.11/12.49 B-1140 Brussels |o| |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o| \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ The Sky is no longer the limit To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 4:53:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from techpower.net (techpower.net [205.133.231.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C87152A6 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 04:53:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hometeam@techpower.net) Received: from localhost (hometeam@localhost) by techpower.net (8.9.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA11715; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 07:56:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 07:56:36 -0500 (EST) From: hometeam To: John Dow Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Ports cannot fetch source In-Reply-To: <19990311163212.H1768@dowcarter.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Or just remake fetch it is a new option. /usr/src/usr.bin/fetch make install I guess if you don't have the source the later would work for now. On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, John Dow wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 10:56:22AM -0500, Brandon Fosdick wrote: > > I had the same problem. I did a 'make world' and it went away. > > -Brandon > > Sounds like the version of fetch is out of sync with the version mentioned > in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk > > Just edit the .mk file, and change the flags - it's obviously the -A that's > causing the make to fail. > > I encountered this problem first time I synced the ports collection after > installing 2.2.8. > > J > > -- > John M Dow - Director, Systems > Dow Carter Ltd : Edinburgh, Scotland : http://www.dowcarter.com > corner (kor-ner) (n): Something for putting manhole covers on > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 5:42:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from out0.mx.skynet.be (out0.mx.skynet.be [195.238.2.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2E3E14C28; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 05:42:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blk@foxbert.skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by out0.mx.skynet.be (8.9.3/odie-relay-v1.0) with SMTP id OAA03088; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:41:49 +0100 (MET) In-Reply-To: <19990312133024.005687@relay.skynet.be> X-Mailer: CTM PowerMail 2.3.1 X-URL: http://www.skynet.be x-sender: blk@foxbert.skynet.be Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:41:40 +0100 To: Brad Knowles , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: Vinum questions? Message-Id: <19990312144140.011407@relay.skynet.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Mar 12, 1999, Brad Knowles wrote: > Anyway, the one hurdle I'm trying to get over at the moment is that >vinum thinks that the devices /dev/da1c through /dev/da9c do not exist >(they do -- I created them with MAKEDEV), and therefore it refuses to >start the disks d1 through d9. Without those disks, of course neither of >the two plexes start up, and of course the volume fails to start as well. Well, my vinum configuration was confused enough that I blew it completely away, then made the mistake of trying to recreate it without rebooting first (against the warnings that I recall running across somewhere). Nice little kernel panic there. At least the 60GB of anonymous ftp disk space wasn't available yet, otherwise the fsck would have taken quite some time. ;-) Anyway, here's a sample error that I get now that I've tried to recreate it again: >vinum -> ld -v >Drive drive1: Device /dev/da1c > Created on at Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970 > Config last updated Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970 > Size: 0 bytes (0 MB) > Used: 0 bytes (0 MB) > Available: 0 bytes (0 MB) > State: down > Last error: Invalid argument All devices /dev/da1c through /dev/da9c exist (and so far as I know are valid), and I can pull disklabels off these devices (although I seem to be unable to write disklabels, so I can't add a partition other than "c" that I could use with vinum). Any hints? Maybe the problem is with being unable to disklabel the drives? Perhaps someone could give me some pointers on how I might be able to successfully force that to happen? Oh, and ssh installed very cleanly, so I don't have to re-type anymore. ;-) Finally, while we're at it, I don't suppose anyone has any experience with running a softupdates filesystem on top of a vinum striped/concatenated volume, do you? Am I dreaming in hoping that I'll be able to get these two working together? -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ____________________________________________________________________ |o| Brad Knowles, Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o| |o| Systems Architect, News/mail/FTP Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o| |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.11.11/12.49 B-1140 Brussels |o| |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o| \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ The Sky is no longer the limit To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 6:27: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.nostrum.com (nostrum-gw.cy-net.net [206.28.0.58]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08CAD14BD3; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 06:26:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pckizer@nostrum.com) Received: (from pckizer@localhost) by mail.nostrum.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) id IAA06485; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:26:14 -0600 Message-Id: <199903121426.IAA06485@mail.nostrum.com> From: Philip Kizer To: Brad Knowles Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Vinum questions? In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:41:40 +0100." <19990312144140.011407@relay.skynet.be> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:26:14 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Brad Knowles wrote: > All devices /dev/da1c through /dev/da9c exist (and so far as I know >are valid), and I can pull disklabels off these devices (although I seem >to be unable to write disklabels, so I can't add a partition other than >"c" that I could use with vinum). That sounds like a problem. Trying to follow the instructions I did the following: o disklabel -e /dev/da1c ; disklabel -e /dev/da2c such that I now have: o disklabel -r /dev/da1c | tail -3 # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] c: 17767827 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 1105*) e: 17767827 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 1105*) disklabel -r /dev/da2c | tail -3 # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] c: 17767827 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 1105*) e: 17767827 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 1105*) I then did a 'vinum create /etc/vinum.conf' with the following config file: # Available drives drive drive1 device /dev/da1e drive drive2 device /dev/da2e # Volume to hold /usr/local volume software plex org concat sd length 512m drive drive1 plex org concat sd length 512m drive drive2 # Volume to hold spool files volume spool plex org concat sd length 8163m drive drive1 plex org concat sd length 8163m drive drive2 I no longer have the screen capture of the vinum create info, but it currently looks like this for me: # vinum l Configuration summary Drives: 2 (4 configured) Volumes: 2 (4 configured) Plexes: 5 (8 configured) Subdisks: 5 (16 configured) D drive1 State: up Device /dev/da1e D drive2 State: up Device /dev/da2e V software State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 512 MB V spool State: up Plexes: 2 Size: 8163 MB P software.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 512 MB P software.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 512 MB P spool.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8163 MB P spool.p1 C State: up Subdisks: 1 Size: 8163 MB S software.p0.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 512 MB S software.p1.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 512 MB S spool.p0.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 8163 MB S spool.p1.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 8163 MB > Any hints? Maybe the problem is with being unable to disklabel the >drives? Perhaps someone could give me some pointers on how I might be >able to successfully force that to happen? The disklabel would be my first guess too, but I would definitely defer to those more familiar. > Finally, while we're at it, I don't suppose anyone has any >experience with running a softupdates filesystem on top of a vinum >striped/concatenated volume, do you? Am I dreaming in hoping that >I'll be able to get these two working together? Well, mine is obviously mirrored, but why not (I really just did this, so the tunfs output is cut/paste): # [ kill various daemons ] # umount /var/spool # tunefs -n enable /dev/vinum/spool tunefs: soft updates set # mount /var/spool # [ restart various daemons :) ] This is actually very good timing for me, I just finished some of my testing of vinum a few days ago and was about to start a new thread complimenting vinum. So, I also wanted to take this opportunity to say what a joy it is to use vinum. It may still be classified as BETA software, but what it does feels quite stable. What definitely sold me was when I unplugged one of the drives in my setup while the system was live and it warned about it and just kept going. Reboot to restore the drive, and a simple 'vinum start $drive.p1.s0' amazed me with how well done and easy to recover it is. -philip To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 7:22:22 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from raven.korax.net (raven.korax.net [209.82.39.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1320515353; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 07:22:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ReachMe@Syne-Post.com) Received: from Syne-Post.com (synepost.dialin.korax.net [209.82.39.76]) by raven.korax.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA13712; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:21:54 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <36E92FFE.A389332F@Syne-Post.com> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:17:18 -0500 From: Phil X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: A boot up problem. References: <199903121426.IAA06485@mail.nostrum.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Geeez the ISP where my box is located keeps having power outages on their floor from somebody down the hall. And so they restart the machine (Fortunately they also run FreeBSD) and it won't automatically CLEAN the disks and it just stops. The sysadmin there manually cleans the disk and then it continues. Here's a message form him as he is probably more clear than I; Doubly so because your unix system also seems to not want to automatically check the filesystems after an improper shutdown, which keeps it from finishing booting until it gets some manual intervention. I'm really curious as to why that is, and I'd actually like to look into it sometime. Well that actually doesn't look very technical to me does it. Anyhow. What can I do to find out why it doesn't want to automatically check the file system and clean it?? Phil To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 7:43: 4 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from angel.double-barrel.be (mail.double-barrel.be [194.7.102.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239B714D26; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 07:42:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mvergall@mail.double-barrel.be) Received: from ns.double-barrel.be (ns.double-barrel.be [194.7.102.18]) by angel.double-barrel.be (8.9.1b+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA00650; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 16:41:46 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (mvergall@localhost) by ns.double-barrel.be (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id QAA01409; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 16:41:45 +0100 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 16:41:45 +0100 (CET) From: "Michael C. Vergallen" To: Phil Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A boot up problem. In-Reply-To: <36E92FFE.A389332F@Syne-Post.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, One idea I may have is to check if the /etc/rc file does not have error's in them and theh check the perms on the fsck binaries and if they exist ... also are they statically linked or not. Michael --- Michael C. Vergallen A.k.A. Mad Mike, Sportstraat 28 http://www.double-barrel.be/mvergall/ B 9000 Gent ftp://ftp.double-barrel.be/pub/linux/ Belgium tel : 32-9-2227764 Fax : 32-9-2224976 On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Phil wrote: > Geeez the ISP where my box is located keeps having power outages on their floor > from somebody down the hall. > > And so they restart the machine (Fortunately they also run FreeBSD) and it won't > automatically CLEAN the disks and it just stops. > The sysadmin there manually cleans the disk and then it continues. > > Here's a message form him as he is probably more clear than I; > > Doubly so because your unix > system also seems to not want to automatically check the filesystems after > an improper shutdown, which keeps it from finishing booting until > it gets some manual intervention. I'm really curious as to why that is, > and I'd actually like to look into it sometime. > > Well that actually doesn't look very technical to me does it. > > Anyhow. What can I do to find out why it doesn't want to automatically check the > file system and clean it?? > > > Phil > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 7:56:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com (cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com [24.2.89.207]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0980715461; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 07:56:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjc@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com) Received: (from cjc@localhost) by cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) id KAA00657; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:55:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from cjc) From: "Crist J. Clark" Message-Id: <199903121555.KAA00657@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> Subject: Re: A boot up problem. In-Reply-To: <36E92FFE.A389332F@Syne-Post.com> from Phil at "Mar 12, 99 10:17:18 am" To: ReachMe@Syne-Post.com (Phil) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:55:46 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: cjclark@home.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Phil wrote, > And so they restart the machine (Fortunately they also run FreeBSD) and it won't > automatically CLEAN the disks and it just stops. > The sysadmin there manually cleans the disk and then it continues. > > Here's a message form him as he is probably more clear than I; > > Doubly so because your unix > system also seems to not want to automatically check the filesystems after > an improper shutdown, which keeps it from finishing booting until > it gets some manual intervention. I'm really curious as to why that is, > and I'd actually like to look into it sometime. > > Well that actually doesn't look very technical to me does it. > > Anyhow. What can I do to find out why it doesn't want to automatically check the > file system and clean it?? One of the first things in /etc/rc is, if [ $1x = autobootx ]; then echo Automatic reboot in progress... fsck -p case $? in 0) ;; 2) exit 1 ;; 4) reboot echo "reboot failed... help!" exit 1 ;; 8) echo "Automatic file system check failed... help!" exit 1 ;; 12) echo "Reboot interrupted" exit 1 ;; 130) # interrupt before catcher installed exit 1 ;; *) echo "Unknown error in reboot" exit 1 ;; esac else echo Skipping disk checks ... fi Find out whcih message is being produced. -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@home.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 8:35:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from stampede.cs.berkeley.edu (stampede.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.45.124]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45632152DF for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:35:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca14-33.ix.netcom.com [205.186.215.33]) by stampede.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA29687; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:35:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.2/8.6.9) id IAA02668; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:34:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:34:56 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199903121634.IAA02668@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: silvia.hip.berkeley.edu: asami set sender to asami@cs.berkeley.edu using -f To: n@nectar.com Cc: stanb@awod.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <199903120340.VAA34504@spawn.nectar.com> (message from Jacques Vidrine on Thu, 11 Mar 1999 21:40:55 -0600) Subject: Re: Help with gnomecontrlcenter port From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) References: <19990312031259.5C1E115210@hub.freebsd.org> <199903120340.VAA34504@spawn.nectar.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * From: Jacques Vidrine * You must mean gdk_imlib.2, correct? You probably have old * versions of libraries that the various GNOME pieces depend * upon. Make sure that you rebuild them all. Check the *_DEPENDS * stuff in the Makefiles for exact dependencies, but here are * some off the top of my head: * * glib12 * gtk12 * imlib * ORBit * libaudiofile * libghttp * libgtop That's exactly what the shared library versions (and LIB_DEPENDS) are supposed to take care of. Can you bump those that are incompatible with the old ones? Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 8:51:16 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from parsons.rh.rit.edu (d111-l052.rh.rit.edu [129.21.111.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB2E14DBE for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:49:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mfisher@csh.rit.edu) Received: from mfisher (helo=localhost) by parsons.rh.rit.edu with local-esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 10LV7s-000DrX-00; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 11:49:32 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 11:49:31 -0500 (EST) From: Mike Fisher X-Sender: mfisher@parsons.rh.rit.edu To: Andy McConnell Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: brooktree848.c and bt848_i2c.c dependency problem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 11 Mar 1999, Andy McConnell wrote: > After upgrading to 3.1, fetching latest src (cvsup last night) and doing a > make world, I can't recompile the kernel with 'device bktr0' It reports > the following failures on `make depend` > > ../../pci/brooktree848.c:399: smbus_if.h: No such file or directory > ../../pci/brooktree848.c:400: iicbus_if.h: No such file or directory > ../../pci/bt848_i2c.c:61: iicbb_if.h: No such file or directory > ../../pci/bt848_i2c.c:62: smbus_if.h: No such file or directory > mkdep: compile failed > *** Error code 1 I had the same problem. Hopefully this will help you. % man bktr SYNOPSIS device bktr0 controller iicbus0 controller iicbb0 controller smbus0 ... - -- Mike "Live for yourself -- there's no one else more worth living for." -- Rush -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0i Comment: Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBNulFnANoiUfuQq8NEQLjWACghHFf6POw3e2RECtVx9CDbHY16UMAoNFR i8bq8dvZMdZ1MGSOcSGR+ruJ =E3PW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 8:53:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cerebus.nectar.com (nectar-gw.nectar.com [204.0.249.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40EEF14CCA; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 08:53:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@nectar.com) Received: (from smap@localhost) by cerebus.nectar.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id KAA13862; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:52:58 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nectar@nectar.com) Received: from spawn.nectar.com(10.0.0.101) by cerebus.nectar.com via smap (V2.1) id xma013860; Fri, 12 Mar 99 10:52:30 -0600 Received: from spawn.nectar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spawn.nectar.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA87742; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:52:30 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nectar@spawn.nectar.com) Message-Id: <199903121652.KAA87742@spawn.nectar.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 X-PGP-RSAfprint: 00 F9 E6 A2 C5 4D 0A 76 26 8B 8B 57 73 D0 DE EE X-PGP-RSAkey: http://www.nectar.com/nectar-pgp262.txt From: Jacques Vidrine In-reply-to: <199903121634.IAA02668@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> References: <19990312031259.5C1E115210@hub.freebsd.org> <199903120340.VAA34504@spawn.nectar.com> <199903121634.IAA02668@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> Subject: Re: Help with gnomecontrlcenter port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Cc: stanb@awod.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:52:30 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Traditionally Vanilla didn't bump the library number of glib, gtk unless there was a major new release. Presumably because updates come out so frequently (libgtk12.99 anyone :-). Or maybe because it is so hard to tell when the library interface actually changes. But I do suppose that this is called for in this batch of upgrades. I'll see to it this weekend when I commit some other fixes for these ports. Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / nectar@FreeBSD.org On 12 March 1999 at 8:34, asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) wrote: > * From: Jacques Vidrine > > * You must mean gdk_imlib.2, correct? You probably have old > * versions of libraries that the various GNOME pieces depend > * upon. Make sure that you rebuild them all. Check the *_DEPENDS > * stuff in the Makefiles for exact dependencies, but here are > * some off the top of my head: > * > * glib12 > * gtk12 > * imlib > * ORBit > * libaudiofile > * libghttp > * libgtop > > That's exactly what the shared library versions (and LIB_DEPENDS) are > supposed to take care of. Can you bump those that are incompatible > with the old ones? > > Satoshi > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 10:17:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from out0.mx.skynet.be (out0.mx.skynet.be [195.238.2.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E709153B4; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:17:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blk@foxbert.skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by out0.mx.skynet.be (8.9.3/odie-relay-v1.0) with SMTP id TAA01464; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 19:16:53 +0100 (MET) In-Reply-To: <199903121426.IAA06485@mail.nostrum.com> X-Mailer: CTM PowerMail 2.3.1 X-URL: http://www.skynet.be x-sender: blk@foxbert.skynet.be Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 19:16:04 +0100 To: Philip Kizer Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: Vinum questions? Message-Id: <19990312191604.015850@relay.skynet.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Mar 12, 1999, Philip Kizer wrote: >I then did a 'vinum create /etc/vinum.conf' with the following config file: I got the disklabels working correctly, but I'm still having problems. The following /etc/vinum.cf file doesn't work correctly: # /etc/vinum.cf - config file for vinum(8) # # Our drives drive d1 device /dev/da1e drive d2 device /dev/da2e drive d3 device /dev/da3e drive d4 device /dev/da4e drive d5 device /dev/da5e drive d6 device /dev/da6e drive d7 device /dev/da7e drive d8 device /dev/da8e drive d9 device /dev/da9e # Our volume with two striped plexes, slightly different in size volume data1 plex p1 plex name p1 org striped 512k sd name sd2 length 17836403b drive d2 sd name sd3 length 17836403b drive d3 sd name sd5 length 17836403b drive d5 sd name sd6 length 17836403b drive d6 volume data2 plex p2 plex name p2 org striped 512k sd name sd4 length 17782939b drive d4 sd name sd7 length 17782939b drive d7 sd name sd8 length 17782939b drive d8 sd name sd9 length 17782939b drive d9 Things are badly screwed up enough that I can't figure out how to delete any of the previous runs, and I can't figure out how to correct any of the existing data. I keep doing a "vinum resetconfig" and then "sync;sync;sync;shutdown -r now" in order to avoid the kernel panic problem that I reported previously. There really ought to be a better way to throw away all the data and start over from scratch, without requiring a klm unload or a reboot. Any ideas or suggestions appreciated. Thanks! -- These are my opinions -- not to be taken as official Skynet policy ____________________________________________________________________ |o| Brad Knowles, Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o| |o| Systems Architect, News/mail/FTP Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o| |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.11.11/12.49 B-1140 Brussels |o| |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o| \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ The Sky is no longer the limit To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 10:22:25 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from paprika.michvhf.com (paprika.michvhf.com [209.57.60.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 68E7314D28 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 10:22:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vev@michvhf.com) Received: (qmail 18395 invoked by uid 1001); 12 Mar 1999 18:22:04 -0000 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 13:22:04 -0500 (EST) From: Vince Vielhaber To: Phil Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: A boot up problem. In-Reply-To: <36E92FFE.A389332F@Syne-Post.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Phil wrote: > Geeez the ISP where my box is located keeps having power outages on their floor > from somebody down the hall. > > And so they restart the machine (Fortunately they also run FreeBSD) and it won't > automatically CLEAN the disks and it just stops. > The sysadmin there manually cleans the disk and then it continues. > > Here's a message form him as he is probably more clear than I; > > Doubly so because your unix > system also seems to not want to automatically check the filesystems after > an improper shutdown, which keeps it from finishing booting until > it gets some manual intervention. I'm really curious as to why that is, > and I'd actually like to look into it sometime. Was this machine upgraded from an older version of FreeBSD? Take a look at the fstab entries and see what format their in. Newer versions of FreeBSD won't complete on a dirty boot with old style fstab entries. Vince. -- ========================================================================== Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com flame-mail: /dev/null # include TEAM-OS2 Online Campground Directory http://www.camping-usa.com Online Giftshop Superstore http://www.cloudninegifts.com ========================================================================== To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 11:44:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dukat.noc.cup.ndp.net (dukat.noc.cup.ndp.net [209.212.224.149]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B519A152F4 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 11:43:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andym@ntt.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.noc.cup.ndp.net [127.0.0.1]) by dukat.noc.cup.ndp.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id LAA21501; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 11:42:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andym@ntt.net) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 11:42:45 -0800 (PST) From: Andy McConnell To: Mike Fisher Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: brooktree848.c and bt848_i2c.c dependency problem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-2022-JP Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG That did it. Including those controllers was key. On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Mike Fisher wrote: }I had the same problem. Hopefully this will help you. } }% man bktr } }SYNOPSIS } device bktr0 } } controller iicbus0 } controller iicbb0 } controller smbus0 -- Andy McConnell $B??8~N}(B $B0BEHN6(B NTT America IP Headquarters We should be careful to get out of an experience only the wisdom that is in it - and stop there; lest we be like the cat that sits down on a hot stove-lid. She will never sit down on a hot stove-lid again, and that is well; but also she will never sit down on a cold one anymore. -- Mark Twain To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 14:21:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from allegro.lemis.com (allegro.lemis.com [192.109.197.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072A114D2F; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:21:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@freebie.lemis.com) Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by allegro.lemis.com (8.9.1/8.9.0) with ESMTP id IAA26407; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 08:50:54 +1030 (CST) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) id IAA06099; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 08:50:53 +1030 (CST) Message-ID: <19990313085052.C429@lemis.com> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 08:50:52 +1030 From: Greg Lehey To: Brad Knowles , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Vinum questions? References: <19990312133024.005687@relay.skynet.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <19990312133024.005687@relay.skynet.be>; from Brad Knowles on Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 01:30:24PM +0100 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Friday, 12 March 1999 at 13:30:24 +0100, Brad Knowles wrote: > Folks, > > Okay, so I have now torn down the Solaris 2.6/x86 anonymous ftp > server that I was working on, and have put FreeBSD 3.1-stable on it > instead. I'm now trying to get vinum working correctly, so that I can > have my disk partitions back (I guess I should also get ssh installed on > there, because right now I'm going to have to manually re-type all the > vinum information ;-). > > Anyway, the one hurdle I'm trying to get over at the moment is that > vinum thinks that the devices /dev/da1c through /dev/da9c do not exist > (they do -- I created them with MAKEDEV), and therefore it refuses to > start the disks d1 through d9. Without those disks, of course neither of > the two plexes start up, and of course the volume fails to start as well. > > > Any suggestions? RTFM (vinum(8)): DRIVE LAYOUT CONSIDERATIONS vinum drives are currently BSD disk partitions. They must be of type unused in order to avoid overwriting file systems. In later versions of vinum this requirement will change to type vinum. Use disklabel -e to ed- it a partition type definition. The following display shows a typical partition layout as shown by disklabel: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 81920 344064 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 240*- 297*) b: 262144 81920 swap # (Cyl. 57*- 240*) c: 4226725 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 2955*) e: 81920 0 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 57*) f: 1900000 425984 4.2BSD 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 297*- 1626*) g: 1900741 2325984 unused 0 0 0 # (Cyl. 1626*- 2955*) In this example, partition g may be used as a vinum partition. Parti- tions a, e and f may be used as UFS file systems or ccd partitions. Par- tition b is a swap partition, and partition c represents the whole disk and should not be used for any other purpose. vinum uses the first 265 sectors on each partition for configuration in- formation, so the maximum size of a subdisk is 265 sectors smaller than the drive. Vinum ignores partition c. This will become more important when I finally get round to creating a vinum fstype: c *must* be "unused", and the vinum partition will then have to be "vinum". It's bad practice to use partition c for anything except administration, anyway. Greg -- See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 14:23:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from allegro.lemis.com (allegro.lemis.com [192.109.197.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3A914C30; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:22:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@freebie.lemis.com) Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by allegro.lemis.com (8.9.1/8.9.0) with ESMTP id IAA26416; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 08:52:35 +1030 (CST) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) id IAA06109; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 08:52:34 +1030 (CST) Message-ID: <19990313085234.D429@lemis.com> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 08:52:34 +1030 From: Greg Lehey To: Brad Knowles , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Vinum questions? References: <19990312133024.005687@relay.skynet.be> <19990312144140.011407@relay.skynet.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <19990312144140.011407@relay.skynet.be>; from Brad Knowles on Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 02:41:40PM +0100 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Friday, 12 March 1999 at 14:41:40 +0100, Brad Knowles wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 1999, Brad Knowles wrote: > >> Anyway, the one hurdle I'm trying to get over at the moment is that >> vinum thinks that the devices /dev/da1c through /dev/da9c do not exist >> (they do -- I created them with MAKEDEV), and therefore it refuses to >> start the disks d1 through d9. Without those disks, of course neither of >> the two plexes start up, and of course the volume fails to start as well. > > Well, my vinum configuration was confused enough that I blew it > completely away, then made the mistake of trying to recreate it without > rebooting first (against the warnings that I recall running across > somewhere). Nice little kernel panic there. Where? Where's the dump? > All devices /dev/da1c through /dev/da9c exist (and so far as I know > are valid), and I can pull disklabels off these devices (although I seem > to be unable to write disklabels, so I can't add a partition other than > "c" that I could use with vinum). What's the problem? > Finally, while we're at it, I don't suppose anyone has any > experience with running a softupdates filesystem on top of a vinum > striped/concatenated volume, do you? Am I dreaming in hoping that > I'll be able to get these two working together? I know somebody's doing it, but I don't recall who. Maybe they'll reply. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 14:25:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from allegro.lemis.com (allegro.lemis.com [192.109.197.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66CF315528; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:25:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@freebie.lemis.com) Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by allegro.lemis.com (8.9.1/8.9.0) with ESMTP id IAA26439; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 08:55:18 +1030 (CST) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) id IAA06120; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 08:55:18 +1030 (CST) Message-ID: <19990313085518.E429@lemis.com> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 08:55:18 +1030 From: Greg Lehey To: Philip Kizer , Brad Knowles Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Vinum questions? References: <19990312144140.011407@relay.skynet.be> <199903121426.IAA06485@mail.nostrum.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <199903121426.IAA06485@mail.nostrum.com>; from Philip Kizer on Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 08:26:14AM -0600 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Friday, 12 March 1999 at 8:26:14 -0600, Philip Kizer wrote: > This is actually very good timing for me, I just finished some of my > testing of vinum a few days ago and was about to start a new thread > complimenting vinum. So, I also wanted to take this opportunity to say > what a joy it is to use vinum. It may still be classified as BETA > software, but what it does feels quite stable. What definitely sold me > was when I unplugged one of the drives in my setup while the system was > live and it warned about it and just kept going. Reboot to restore the > drive, You don't need to reboot. Replace the drive, run 'camcontrol rescan', and then you can restart it. > and a simple 'vinum start $drive.p1.s0' amazed me with how well done > and easy to recover it is. Glad to hear it. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 14:31:14 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from allegro.lemis.com (allegro.lemis.com [192.109.197.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE6D153EE; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 14:31:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from grog@freebie.lemis.com) Received: from freebie.lemis.com (freebie.lemis.com [192.109.197.137]) by allegro.lemis.com (8.9.1/8.9.0) with ESMTP id JAA26468; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 09:00:47 +1030 (CST) Received: (from grog@localhost) by freebie.lemis.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) id JAA06131; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 09:00:46 +1030 (CST) Message-ID: <19990313090046.F429@lemis.com> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 09:00:46 +1030 From: Greg Lehey To: Brad Knowles , Philip Kizer Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Vinum questions? References: <199903121426.IAA06485@mail.nostrum.com> <19990312191604.015850@relay.skynet.be> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <19990312191604.015850@relay.skynet.be>; from Brad Knowles on Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 07:16:04PM +0100 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.lemis.com/~grog Organization: LEMIS, PO Box 460, Echunga SA 5153, Australia Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-41-739-7062 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Friday, 12 March 1999 at 19:16:04 +0100, Brad Knowles wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 1999, Philip Kizer wrote: > >> I then did a 'vinum create /etc/vinum.conf' with the following config file: > > I got the disklabels working correctly, but I'm still having > problems. The following /etc/vinum.cf file doesn't work correctly: > > # /etc/vinum.cf - config file for vinum(8) > # > # Our drives > drive d1 device /dev/da1e > drive d2 device /dev/da2e > drive d3 device /dev/da3e > drive d4 device /dev/da4e > drive d5 device /dev/da5e > drive d6 device /dev/da6e > drive d7 device /dev/da7e > drive d8 device /dev/da8e > drive d9 device /dev/da9e > # Our volume with two striped plexes, slightly different in size > volume data1 plex p1 > plex name p1 org striped 512k > sd name sd2 length 17836403b drive d2 > sd name sd3 length 17836403b drive d3 > sd name sd5 length 17836403b drive d5 > sd name sd6 length 17836403b drive d6 > volume data2 plex p2 > plex name p2 org striped 512k > sd name sd4 length 17782939b drive d4 > sd name sd7 length 17782939b drive d7 > sd name sd8 length 17782939b drive d8 > sd name sd9 length 17782939b drive d9 You haven't said what happens. It would be nice to see the output of `vinum create -V /etc/vinum.cf'. > Things are badly screwed up enough that I can't figure out how to > delete any of the previous runs, and I can't figure out how to correct > any of the existing data. I keep doing a "vinum resetconfig" and then > "sync;sync;sync;shutdown -r now" in order to avoid the kernel panic > problem that I reported previously. And what happens? There were a couple of gross uglinesses in the resetconfig and unload code which occasionally caused hangs or panics. I've fixed them in -CURRENT, but not yet in -STABLE. You'd probably be better off using the -CURRENT version of Vinum (it's still, as of today, fully compatible with -STABLE). It shouldn't panic. If you (or anybody else) get a panic with Vinum, PLEASE REPORT IT. Vinum's a complicated driver to debug, and I can't hope to do all the testing myself. If you don't report a panic, it's probably going to happen again. There are detailed instructions on what to do in vinum(4). Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address, home page and phone numbers finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 16:21: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from stennis.ca.sandia.gov (stennis.ca.sandia.gov [146.246.243.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5ED314C2D; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 16:21:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@stennis.ca.sandia.gov) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by stennis.ca.sandia.gov (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA05355; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 16:20:26 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199903130020.QAA05355@stennis.ca.sandia.gov> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Greg Lehey Cc: Brad Knowles , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Vinum questions? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 13 Mar 1999 08:52:34 +1030." <19990313085234.D429@lemis.com> From: bmah@CA.Sandia.GOV (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-To: bmah@CA.Sandia.GOV X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Url: http://www.ca.sandia.gov/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_931159648P"; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 16:20:26 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_931159648P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Greg Lehey wrote: > On Friday, 12 March 1999 at 14:41:40 +0100, Brad Knowles wrote: > > Finally, while we're at it, I don't suppose anyone has any > > experience with running a softupdates filesystem on top of a vinum > > striped/concatenated volume, do you? Am I dreaming in hoping that > > I'll be able to get these two working together? > > I know somebody's doing it, but I don't recall who. Maybe they'll > reply. I'm doing it...I have a 3.1-RELEASE machine with a vinum volume composed of a striped plex across two subdisks (about 8.5GB each), with softupdates enabled. I can't claim to have stressed the resulting combination very hard, but my experience is that it just works. Just follow the instructions for enabling softupdates, but apply them to the vinum volume (unmounted of course) instead of a disk device. Bruce. --==_Exmh_931159648P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNumvSajOOi0j7CY9AQFSkwP9FPAW8SerBSf4nYxuyp8qmoMCFDBJ+eKc J3UQoOVYjtuSmUl9geRwtnVKkFMxOsxQt543DfWYr/jLSSyZyd12XtDuP27pXLoM mHE4qlojYn1ugEmSCoLU2W4LRVyIkAHRHQyaBV6+bZ37yDWCWa4PBW3c4zdonLhB Dcm94fEIxo0= =lCPy -----END PGP MESSAGE----- --==_Exmh_931159648P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 16:24:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.iprg.nokia.com (mailhost.iprg.nokia.com [205.226.5.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A098A14FA5 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 16:24:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scott@iprg.nokia.com) Received: from iprg.nokia.com (melkor.iprg.nokia.com [205.226.1.82]) by mailhost.iprg.nokia.com (8.8.8/8.6.10) with ESMTP id QAA01626; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 16:24:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <36E9B029.3390F873@iprg.nokia.com> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 16:24:09 -0800 From: Scott Sewall Organization: Nokia Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: XFree86 port for 2.2.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm trying to build the XFree86 port for 2.2.6. It fails applying a patch: >> X332src-1.tgz doesn't seem to exist on this system. >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/3.3.2/source/. Receiving X332src-1.tgz (16242039 bytes) 16242039 bytes transfered in 447.7 seconds (35.43 Kbytes/s) >> X332src-2.tgz doesn't seem to exist on this system. >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/3.3.2/source/. Receiving X332src-2.tgz (14491362 bytes) 14491362 bytes transfered in 439.1 seconds (32.23 Kbytes/s) >> Checksum OK for xc/X332src-1.tgz. >> Checksum OK for xc/X332src-2.tgz. ===> Extracting for XFree86-3.3.2 ===> Patching for XFree86-3.3.2 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for XFree86-3.3.2 2 out of 4 hunks failed--saving rejects to programs/xdm/session.c.rej *** Error code 2 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. Any recommendations? -- Scott To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 16:34:57 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from grizzly.fas.com (cc69528-a.mtpls1.sc.home.com [24.6.61.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018DD14D71 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 16:34:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stanb@awod.com) Received: by grizzly.fas.com ($Revision: 1.37.109.23 $/16.2) id AA064285269; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 19:34:29 -0500 Subject: Which release for a laptop? To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Stable Mailing List) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 19:34:28 -0500 (EST) From: "Stan Brown" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 761 Message-Id: <19990313003454.018DD14D71@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a new laptop that is working nicely inder 3.0. This fres up the older Toshiba Tecra 500CDT to run a somewhat mre modern version than it curently has. So heres the question 3.1? ot 4.0? This machine is not production critical. but I would like the laptop features (PCMCIA NIC) to work. -- Stan Brown stanb@netcom.com 843-745-3154 Westvaco Charleston SC. -- Windows 98: n. useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. - (c) 1999 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 17: 6:42 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pwrtc.com (pwrtc.com [206.230.144.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF5C14C2D for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 17:06:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pazuzu@amphigory.com) Received: from legba.pwrtc.com (legba.pwrtc.com [206.230.144.223]) by pwrtc.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA01142 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 20:06:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (root@localhost) by legba.pwrtc.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA23031 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 20:05:47 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199903130105.UAA23031@legba.pwrtc.com> X-SMTP: hello Erzulie from pazuzu@amphigory.com server @erzulie ip 192.168.1.2 X-Sender: pazuzu@legba (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 20:06:02 -0500 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: "Jon M. Craig (Pazuzu)" Subject: TRYING to install from Walnut Creek FreeBSD 3.1 CD....(HELP!) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have the Walnut Creek CDROM FreeBSD 3.1 CD, and I'm trying to install from it, and I'm having major problems. The first is that I can't install from the CD itself. If I pick CDROM as a media type, the install says "No CDROM devices found" (EVEN HOUGH I BOOTED THE INSTALL FROM CD!). Further checking (using scroll-lock and up arrow) shows that "wdc1 not found at 0x170". Odd... Using Win98 System Info it shows secondary IDE at IRQ 15 addr 0x170. And that's where my CDROM is, and it works. Well then ok... I try installing from my Win98 partition. The booklet with the CD mentions a "setup.exe" that will copy the dists for me, but that doesn't exist, so fine, I manually copy the ENTIRE CDROM to C:\FREEBSD\, then boot the install, picking MS-DOS partition as the media. That seems to work fine - BUT - when I get the boot menu it lists F1-DOS and F2-FreeBSD. If I hit F2 the machine simply beeps. Does nothing. F1 boots Win98 as expected. Soooooo... What do I need to do to get this puppy working? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 17:21:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from netrinsics.com (unknown [202.99.61.147]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A80F14D6C for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 17:21:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robinson@netrinsics.com) Received: (from robinson@localhost) by netrinsics.com (8.9.2/8.8.7) id JAA35022 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 09:16:39 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from robinson) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 09:16:39 +0800 (CST) From: Michael Robinson Message-Id: <199903130116.JAA35022@netrinsics.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome installation Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG With all the trouble people are having with the ports, I thought I'd point out that you don't really need one. I've been updating and compiling out of the Gnome CVS tree a few times a week for the last few months. There were a few glitches for FreeBSD early on, but they've cleaned those up. As long as you have all the pieces of "gettext" properly installed, it should be compile and go (unless the tree is broken, of course). -Michael Robinson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 17:40:14 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from grizzly.fas.com (cc69528-a.mtpls1.sc.home.com [24.6.61.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6A9E152FC for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 17:39:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stanb@awod.com) Received: by grizzly.fas.com ($Revision: 1.37.109.23 $/16.2) id AA126559179; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 20:39:39 -0500 Subject: Where have the pccardd messages gone? To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Stable Mailing List) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 20:39:38 -0500 (EST) From: "Stan Brown" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1021 Message-Id: <19990313013959.C6A9E152FC@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have a little perl script called from pccrrd via teh "insert" mechanisim, that autocinfigures my laptops for all the networks they may find themselves on. It puts out a few informative message, that I like to see. Under 2.2.7 with the PAO patches these messages appera on the console during boot. Under 3.0 they do not. Now I found the rc.pccard, and noted that the noise is suposed to be redirected to /var/log/pccadd.log, but it is not even showing up there! How is this being invoked sunsc that the messages are lsot? Hw can I "fix" this. -- Stan Brown stanb@netcom.com 843-745-3154 Westvaco Charleston SC. -- Windows 98: n. useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. - (c) 1999 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 18:19: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dei.calldei.com (dei.calldei.com [205.179.37.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9829214D96 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 18:18:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@dei.calldei.com) Received: from localhost (chris@localhost) by dei.calldei.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id SAA17845; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 18:22:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 18:22:19 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Costello To: Stan Brown Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Subject: Re: Which release for a laptop? In-Reply-To: <19990313003454.018DD14D71@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Stan Brown wrote: > I have a new laptop that is working nicely inder 3.0. This fres up the > older Toshiba Tecra 500CDT to run a somewhat mre modern version than it > curently has. > > So heres the question 3.1? ot 4.0? This machine is not production > critical. but I would like the laptop features (PCMCIA NIC) to work. Seeing as 4.0 is not -RELEASE and won't be for a very long time, I'd say 3.1-RELEASE (or 3.1-STABLE, preferably) would be a good choice. > > -- > Stan Brown stanb@netcom.com 843-745-3154 > Westvaco > Charleston SC. > -- > Windows 98: n. > useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and > a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system > originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit > company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. > - > (c) 1999 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 18:26: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ceia.nordier.com (m1-30-dbn.dial-up.net [196.34.155.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F5614DBB for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 18:25:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rnordier@nordier.com) Received: (from rnordier@localhost) by ceia.nordier.com (8.8.7/8.6.12) id EAA01698; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 04:23:19 +0200 (SAT) From: Robert Nordier Message-Id: <199903130223.EAA01698@ceia.nordier.com> Subject: Re: TRYING to install from Walnut Creek FreeBSD 3.1 CD....(HELP!) In-Reply-To: <199903130105.UAA23031@legba.pwrtc.com> from "Jon M. Craig" at "Mar 12, 99 08:06:02 pm" To: pazuzu@amphigory.com (Jon M. Craig) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 04:23:17 +0200 (SAT) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I have the Walnut Creek CDROM FreeBSD 3.1 CD, and I'm trying to install > from it, and I'm having major problems. > > The first is that I can't install from the CD itself. If I pick CDROM as a > media type, the install says "No CDROM devices found" (EVEN HOUGH I BOOTED > THE INSTALL FROM CD!). Further checking (using scroll-lock and up arrow) > shows that "wdc1 not found at 0x170". Odd... Using Win98 System Info it > shows secondary IDE at IRQ 15 addr 0x170. And that's where my CDROM is, > and it works. This is not quite as strange as it may seem. Booting from CD makes use of the PC BIOS, but FreeBSD itself, like other 32-bit OSes, uses its own CD-ROM device drivers. In all probability, the configuration can be changed so that the CD-ROM drive is detected, but I'd suggest we concentrate on just getting the machine booting, for the moment. > Well then ok... I try installing from my Win98 partition. The booklet > with the CD mentions a "setup.exe" that will copy the dists for me, but > that doesn't exist, so fine, I manually copy the ENTIRE CDROM to > C:\FREEBSD\, then boot the install, picking MS-DOS partition as the media. The setup.exe program is now obsolete, and was dropped from the distribution around the time of the 3.1 release. I believe the text file used in printing the booklet has since been revised to reflect this. > That seems to work fine - BUT - when I get the boot menu it lists F1-DOS > and F2-FreeBSD. If I hit F2 the machine simply beeps. Does nothing. F1 > boots Win98 as expected. > > Soooooo... What do I need to do to get this puppy working? I'd suggest you try booting from the CD again, and then hit the space bar at the stage where you see a countdown to an automatic boot. This should give you an interactive prompt. Part of the displayed info should contain lines like BIOS drive C: is disk2 Try entering boot disk2s2a:/kernel though (because booting from CD-ROM shifts the drive assignments around) you may have to substitute (say) "disk1" or "disk3" for the "disk2" portion of the command. That should get you a login prompt. Let us know either way, and we can take it from there. -- Robert Nordier To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 21:16:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cerebus.nectar.com (nectar-gw.nectar.com [204.0.249.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613B814D72 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 21:16:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@nectar.com) Received: (from smap@localhost) by cerebus.nectar.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id XAA15473; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 23:16:06 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nectar@nectar.com) Received: from spawn.nectar.com(10.0.0.101) by cerebus.nectar.com via smap (V2.1) id xma015471; Fri, 12 Mar 99 23:16:05 -0600 Received: from spawn.nectar.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spawn.nectar.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA23069; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 23:16:04 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nectar@spawn.nectar.com) Message-Id: <199903130516.XAA23069@spawn.nectar.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 X-PGP-RSAfprint: 00 F9 E6 A2 C5 4D 0A 76 26 8B 8B 57 73 D0 DE EE X-PGP-RSAkey: http://www.nectar.com/nectar-pgp262.txt From: Jacques Vidrine In-reply-to: <199903130116.JAA35022@netrinsics.com> References: <199903130116.JAA35022@netrinsics.com> Subject: Re: Gnome installation Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: Michael Robinson Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Fri, 12 Mar 1999 23:16:04 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If people are having trouble building he gnome ports, please drop me a line at . You may also want to cc: the MAINTAINER . I've only heard one report so far about the build. Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / nectar@FreeBSD.org On 13 March 1999 at 9:16, Michael Robinson wrote: > With all the trouble people are having with the ports, I thought I'd point > out that you don't really need one. I've been updating and compiling out of > the Gnome CVS tree a few times a week for the last few months. There were > a few glitches for FreeBSD early on, but they've cleaned those up. As > long as you have all the pieces of "gettext" properly installed, it should > be compile and go (unless the tree is broken, of course). > > -Michael Robinson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 12 22:48:39 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from asteroid.svib.ru (asteroid.svib.ru [195.151.166.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A196614D44 for ; Fri, 12 Mar 1999 22:48:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tarkhil@asteroid.svib.ru) Received: from shuttle.svib.ru (root@shuttle.svib.ru [195.151.166.144]) by asteroid.svib.ru (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA26218; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 09:48:15 +0300 (MSK) Received: from shuttle.svib.ru (tarkhil@minas-tirith.pol.ru [127.0.0.1]) by shuttle.svib.ru (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA13767; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 09:50:14 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from tarkhil@shuttle.svib.ru) Message-Id: <199903130650.JAA13767@shuttle.svib.ru> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Jon M. Craig (Pazuzu)" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: TRYING to install from Walnut Creek FreeBSD 3.1 CD....(HELP!) In-reply-to: Your message "Fri, 12 Mar 1999 20:06:02 EST." <199903130105.UAA23031@legba.pwrtc.com> Reply-To: tarkhil@asteroid.svib.ru X-URL: http://freebsd.svib.ru Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 09:50:14 +0300 From: Alex Povolotsky Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG <199903130105.UAA23031@legba.pwrtc.com>"Jon M. Craig (Pazuzu)" writes: >media type, the install says "No CDROM devices found" (EVEN HOUGH I BOOTED >THE INSTALL FROM CD!). Further checking (using scroll-lock and up arrow) >shows that "wdc1 not found at 0x170". Odd... Using Win98 System Info it >shows secondary IDE at IRQ 15 addr 0x170. And that's where my CDROM is, >and it works. I guess you have your CD-ROM slave on secondary IDE, with no master. I'd suggest you to change it to master on secondary and enjoy. Alex. -- Alexander B. Povolotsky [ICQ 18277558] [2:5020/145] [http://freebsd.svib.ru] [tarkhil@asteroid.svib.ru] [Urgent messages: 234-9696 ÁÂ.#35442 or tarkhil@pager.express.ru] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 0: 9:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leaf.lumiere.net (leaf.lumiere.net [207.218.152.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C409614E46 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 00:07:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from j@leaf.lumiere.net) Received: (from j@localhost) by leaf.lumiere.net (8.9.2/8.9.1) id AAA70157; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 00:06:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 00:06:35 -0800 (PST) From: Jesse To: Mark Murray Cc: Chris Parry , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make world in 3.0 failing In-Reply-To: <199902160633.IAA26377@greenpeace.grondar.za> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > OUTPUT FROM MAKE: > > ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl > > find: build: No such file or directory > > find: build: No such file or directory > Your source tree is dirty; Clean it up as much as possible by > running "cd /usr/src; make cleandir; make cleandir"; then clean > your obj tree properly by doing a "cd /usr/obj; chflags -R 0 .; > rm -rf *". Then cvsup, and try again. I'm having similar problems. I get ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl find: build: No such file or directory find: build: No such file or directory mkdir: lib/auto: File exists *** Error code 1 And it fails right there. I followed your suggestions and it does the same thing. *sigh* --- Jesse http://www.lumiere.net/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 2:46:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2073614E16 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 02:45:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA32127 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 02:46:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 02:46:22 -0800 Message-ID: <32125.921321982@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It's a little close on the heels of 3.1, but there have been a significant number of things found and fixed in 3.1 that I'm almost itching for a 3.1.1 at this point. Failing that, and I think a point release would be just a bit overkill anyway, we can do 3.2 after a reasonable minimum interval period and that would be, IMO, May 1st at the earliest. Comments? - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 4:27:47 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shell6.ba.best.com (shell6.ba.best.com [206.184.139.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C2914C2A for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 04:27:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkb@shell6.ba.best.com) Received: (from jkb@localhost) by shell6.ba.best.com (8.9.3/8.9.2/best.sh) id EAA25721; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 04:27:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <19990313042700.C24467@best.com> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 04:27:01 -0800 From: "Jan B. Koum " To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? References: <32125.921321982@zippy.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <32125.921321982@zippy.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 02:46:22AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 02:46:22AM -0800, "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > It's a little close on the heels of 3.1, but there have been a > significant number of things found and fixed in 3.1 that I'm almost > itching for a 3.1.1 at this point. Failing that, and I think a point > release would be just a bit overkill anyway, we can do 3.2 after a > reasonable minimum interval period and that would be, IMO, May 1st at > the earliest. > > Comments? > > - Jordan > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message Doing the nasty thing and switching subject: Is it just me, or is it now that we have 3.x and 4.x most of the bug fixes in 4.x never make it back into 3.x? -- Yan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 7:23:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ontario.mooseriver.com (ontario.mooseriver.com [208.138.31.116]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0A9C14E4A for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 07:23:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jgrosch@ontario.mooseriver.com) Received: (from jgrosch@localhost) by ontario.mooseriver.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) id HAA44634; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 07:22:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jgrosch) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 07:22:40 -0800 From: Josef Grosch To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? Message-ID: <19990313072240.A44604@ontario.mooseriver.com> Reply-To: jgrosch@MooseRiver.com References: <32125.921321982@zippy.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <32125.921321982@zippy.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 02:46:22AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 02:46:22AM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > It's a little close on the heels of 3.1, but there have been a > significant number of things found and fixed in 3.1 that I'm almost > itching for a 3.1.1 at this point. Failing that, and I think a point > release would be just a bit overkill anyway, we can do 3.2 after a > reasonable minimum interval period and that would be, IMO, May 1st at > the earliest. I was under the impression that we had gotten away from the point release after the 2.2.x releases. Either way, a 3.2 release 3 months after 3.1 might be a good idea. Could you list a few of the significant fixes that have made it into the tree. Josef -- Josef Grosch | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 3.1 jgrosch@MooseRiver.com | Micro$oft free world | UNIX for the masses To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 7:33: 0 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.directlink.net (mailhost.directlink.net [207.239.163.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8651514CEF for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 07:32:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billh@directlink.net) Received: from directlink.net [207.239.163.119] by mailhost.directlink.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-5.01) id A718141300B6; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 10:49:28 EST Message-ID: <36EA83F7.9E1E9D11@directlink.net> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 09:27:51 -0600 From: Bill Hamilton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win95; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jesse Cc: Mark Murray , Chris Parry , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make world in 3.0 failing References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have similar problems with 3.1 . Make upgrade fails. I do make includes, then make depend. I get : ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl sh config_h.sh Can't find config.sh. *** Error code 1 If I do make most, I get: cc: /usr/src/libexec/named-xfer/../../lib/libbind/libbind.a: No such file or directory I'm beginning to think that upgrading from source is an urban legend. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 8:20:11 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gratis.grondar.za (gratis.grondar.za [196.7.18.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB80B14ED7 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 08:20:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from greenpeace.grondar.za (greenpeace.grondar.za [196.7.18.132]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id SAA13735; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:19:42 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greenpeace.grondar.za (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA71986; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:19:44 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <199903131619.SAA71986@greenpeace.grondar.za> To: Bill Hamilton Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make world in 3.0 failing In-Reply-To: Your message of " Sat, 13 Mar 1999 09:27:51 CST." <36EA83F7.9E1E9D11@directlink.net> References: <36EA83F7.9E1E9D11@directlink.net> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:19:44 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Bill Hamilton wrote: > Make upgrade fails. ...then proceeding is silly. > sh config_h.sh > Can't find config.sh. > *** Error code 1 > > If I do make most, I get: > cc: /usr/src/libexec/named-xfer/../../lib/libbind/libbind.a: No such > file or directory > > I'm beginning to think that upgrading from source is an urban legend. Fix your "make upgrade" (for which you post absolutely no diagnostic information whatsoever), and the rest shpuld fall into place. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 8:26:46 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freed.libdns.qc.ca (derby.JSP.UMontreal.CA [132.204.45.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F0214ED2 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 08:26:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from spidey@libdns.qc.ca) Received: from localhost (spidey@localhost) by freed.libdns.qc.ca (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id LAA15821; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 11:26:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from spidey@libdns.qc.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: freed.libdns.qc.ca: spidey owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 11:26:11 -0500 (EST) From: Spidey Reply-To: Spidey To: Scott Sewall Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: XFree86 port for 2.2.6 In-Reply-To: <36E9B029.3390F873@iprg.nokia.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Install 3.3.3! It is much more stable and performant. :) On Fri, 12 Mar 1999, Scott Sewall wrote: > I'm trying to build the XFree86 port for 2.2.6. > > It fails applying a patch: > > >> X332src-1.tgz doesn't seem to exist on this system. > >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/3.3.2/source/. > Receiving X332src-1.tgz (16242039 bytes) > 16242039 bytes transfered in 447.7 seconds (35.43 Kbytes/s) > >> X332src-2.tgz doesn't seem to exist on this system. > >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.xfree86.org/pub/XFree86/3.3.2/source/. > Receiving X332src-2.tgz (14491362 bytes) > 14491362 bytes transfered in 439.1 seconds (32.23 Kbytes/s) > >> Checksum OK for xc/X332src-1.tgz. > >> Checksum OK for xc/X332src-2.tgz. > ===> Extracting for XFree86-3.3.2 > ===> Patching for XFree86-3.3.2 > ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for XFree86-3.3.2 > 2 out of 4 hunks failed--saving rejects to programs/xdm/session.c.rej > *** Error code 2 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > > > Any recommendations? > > -- Scott > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > When a man lies he murders some part of the world These are the pale deaths which men miscall their lives All this I can witness any longer Cannot the kingdom of salvation take me home To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 9: 3:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gaia.euronet.nl (gaia.euronet.nl [194.134.0.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC08414EBF for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 09:03:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@scc.nl) Received: from scones.sup.scc.nl (i357.ztm.euronet.nl [194.134.67.118]) by gaia.euronet.nl (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA11215 from for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:03:20 +0100 (MET) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by scones.sup.scc.nl (8.9.3/8.9.1) id RAA32298 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 17:35:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@scc.nl) Received: from GATEWAY by scones.sup.scc.nl with netnews for stable@FreeBSD.ORG (stable@FreeBSD.ORG) To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 17:35:33 +0100 From: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <36EA93D5.E15366C2@scc.nl> Organization: SCC vof Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <32125.921321982@zippy.cdrom.com> Subject: Re: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > It's a little close on the heels of 3.1, but there have been a > significant number of things found and fixed in 3.1 that I'm almost > itching for a 3.1.1 at this point. Failing that, and I think a point > release would be just a bit overkill anyway, we can do 3.2 after a > reasonable minimum interval period and that would be, IMO, May 1st at > the earliest. > > Comments? I know the feeling. The ports I made for the Linux emulator weren't finished on time for R3.1. They are finished now and (of course) I like to see them included in a next release. That, and the patches of Luoqi Chen, would further improve (IMO) Linux emulation as a whole and enable FreeBSD to continue to benefit from Linux' momentum (...) So, yes, a 3.2 release soon would be good strategic move, but not without at least the patches of Luoqi Chen. The inclusion of my ports in the next release (which of course I definitely like to see included) is somewhat less important. Whether May 1st is feasable, depends on whether the patches (and ports) are fit for inclusion before that time (ignoring all other release-related issues for a moment) while leaving enough time to solve any unexpected problems. For as far as my knowledge goes, I would say they are both ready for inclusion now... BTW: What about a list of "supported" (commercial) Linux applications under FreeBSD, in the same way there is a list of supported hardware? marcel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 10: 2:51 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1AA14E9B for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 10:01:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA098326039; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 12:27:19 -0500 Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 12:27:19 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: "Jan B. Koum " Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? In-Reply-To: <19990313042700.C24467@best.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Jan B. Koum wrote: > Doing the nasty thing and switching subject: > Is it just me, or is it now that we have 3.x and 4.x most of > the bug fixes in 4.x never make it back into 3.x? It's not just you, few things are being merged, and it's going to get ugly once these files start to change. I can understand the vm stuff taking a while, but a lot of changes (man pages, nits, etc) shouldn't even have conflicts on a merge. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 10:35:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E5A14CB1 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 10:35:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA29979; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 10:34:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) From: John Polstra Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) id KAA64847; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 10:34:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 10:34:54 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199903131834.KAA64847@vashon.polstra.com> To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com Subject: Re: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? In-Reply-To: <32125.921321982@zippy.cdrom.com> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Cc: stable@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <32125.921321982@zippy.cdrom.com>, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > It's a little close on the heels of 3.1, but there have been a > significant number of things found and fixed in 3.1 that I'm almost > itching for a 3.1.1 at this point. Failing that, and I think a point > release would be just a bit overkill anyway, we can do 3.2 after a > reasonable minimum interval period and that would be, IMO, May 1st at > the earliest. I'd prefer 3.2 over 3.1.1. I don't think any of the bugfixes are urgent enough to merit a point release. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Self-interest is the aphrodisiac of belief." -- James V. DeLong To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 12: 1:50 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail-out.visi.com (tele.visi.com [209.98.98.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC57E14E16 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 12:01:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from veldy@visi.com) Received: from isis.visi.com (isis.visi.com [209.98.98.8]) by mail-out.visi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68B81F806 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 14:01:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (veldy@localhost) by isis.visi.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA03334 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 14:01:28 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: isis.visi.com: veldy owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 14:01:28 -0600 (CST) From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: 3.1 RELEASE source with stable snapshot Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG All, Has anybody noticed that it appears that recent snapshots of 3.1-STABLE have included the 3.1-RELEASE source code instead of the more up to date STABLE source code? I has installing 3.1-19990305-STABLE that I had on CD on a friends computer and when I cvsup'd the newest STABLE code, I noticed updates from mid february. Lots of them. It appears to me that the 3.1-RELEASE source code is what has been included in the snapshots. I might add that the tag at boot time appropriately shows 3.1-19990305-STABLE. Tom Veldhouse veldy@visi.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 13:11:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C644614BE6 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 13:11:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA05129; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 13:11:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: jgrosch@MooseRiver.com Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 13 Mar 1999 07:22:40 PST." <19990313072240.A44604@ontario.mooseriver.com> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 13:11:50 -0800 Message-ID: <5127.921359510@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I was under the impression that we had gotten away from the point release > after the 2.2.x releases. Either way, a 3.2 release 3 months after 3.1 Just to correct this one, it's not that we've "gotten away" from point releases so much as reassigned the meaning of them. Rather than doing point releases as a matter of course, we'll now use them just for serious bug fix / incremental release situations. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 13:24:30 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B58214E81 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 13:24:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA05170; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 13:24:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 3.1 RELEASE source with stable snapshot In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 13 Mar 1999 14:01:28 CST." Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 13:24:24 -0800 Message-ID: <5168.921360264@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Has anybody noticed that it appears that recent snapshots of > 3.1-STABLE have included the 3.1-RELEASE source code instead of the more > up to date STABLE source code? There was an issue where the CVS repository on current.freebsd.org wasn't being updated since February 3rd. I fixed it and reorganized the snapshot server somewhat, now I'm just trying to find and fix a problem with 3.1-STABLE that causes the snapshot machine to panic with "multiple frees". - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 14: 9: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bolero-x.rahul.net (bolero.rahul.net [192.160.13.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02A0514E7D for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 14:09:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dhesi@rahul.net) Received: from waltz.rahul.net by bolero-x.rahul.net with SMTP id AA11031 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for ); Sat, 13 Mar 1999 14:08:43 -0800 From: Rahul Dhesi Received: by waltz.rahul.net (5.67b8/jive-a2i-1.0) id AA24401; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 14:08:38 -0800 Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 14:08:38 -0800 Message-Id: <199903132208.AA24401@waltz.rahul.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? References: X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.1 (NOV) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just my opinion: The next major release of FreeBSD 3.x should be so reliable and bug-free that sites can install it and have a high degree of confidence that they won't need to apply any bug fixes for at least 6 months. Since there have already been two releases (3.0 and 3.1) which served as test releases, the time is now ripe for one matching the description above. Rahul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 15: 5:19 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sand2.sentex.ca (sand2.sentex.ca [209.167.248.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7AF14DDB for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 15:05:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from gravel (ospf-wat.sentex.net [209.167.248.81]) by sand2.sentex.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA12939; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:04:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <4.1.19990313181130.04ff4480@granite.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtancsa@granite.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:13:35 -0500 To: John Polstra , jkh@zippy.cdrom.com From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <199903131834.KAA64847@vashon.polstra.com> References: <32125.921321982@zippy.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >I'd prefer 3.2 over 3.1.1. I don't think any of the bugfixes are urgent >enough to merit a point release. Well, from my perspective the deadlocks in mmap() that allow pretty well any shell user or person uploading cgi scripts to halt a machine are pretty critical. I dont think they are fully resolved yet either. ---Mike ********************************************************************** Mike Tancsa, Network Admin * mike@sentex.net Sentex Communications Corp, * http://www.sentex.net/mike Cambridge, Ontario * 01.519.651.3400 Canada * To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 15: 7: 3 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from studict.student.utwente.nl (studict.student.utwente.nl [130.89.220.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F7314F1D for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 15:06:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lva@dds.nl) Received: from ren (ut127003.inbel.utwente.nl [130.89.127.3]) by studict.student.utwente.nl (8.8.6/MQT) with SMTP id AAA07523 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 00:06:33 +0100 (MET) Reply-To: From: "laurens van alphen" To: Subject: RE: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 00:06:33 +0100 Message-ID: <000401be6da6$234166c0$0a0010ac@ren.craxx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 In-Reply-To: <199903132208.AA24401@waltz.rahul.net> Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Rahul wrote: > Just my opinion: The next major release of FreeBSD 3.x should be so > reliable and bug-free that sites can install it and have a high degree > of confidence that they won't need to apply any bug fixes for at least 6 > months. agreed. what's the point of having -stable and -current otherwise? don't tell us that bugs can't be predicted. you can (sort of) by not putting untested (or only half tested) features in there. -- laurens van alphen, craxx alphen@craxx.com, http://craxx.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 15:40:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.HiWAAY.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28EEE14E88 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 15:40:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (tnt8-216-180-14-97.dialup.HiWAAY.net [216.180.14.97]) by mail.HiWAAY.net (8.9.1a/8.9.0) with ESMTP id RAA02993; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 17:39:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nospam.hiwaay.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA32139; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 17:39:44 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Message-Id: <199903132339.RAA32139@nospam.hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: David Kelly Subject: Re: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? In-reply-to: Message from "Jordan K. Hubbard" of "Sat, 13 Mar 1999 02:46:22 PST." <32125.921321982@zippy.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 17:39:43 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: > It's a little close on the heels of 3.1, but there have been a > significant number of things found and fixed in 3.1 that I'm almost > itching for a 3.1.1 at this point. Failing that, and I think a point > release would be just a bit overkill anyway, we can do 3.2 after a > reasonable minimum interval period and that would be, IMO, May 1st at > the earliest. > > Comments? Then I think I need to get off my butt and call WC to make sure my next subscription shipment includes a FreeBSD hat and some of those 1" square FreeBSD logo thingies to slap on the front of generic PC cases. Meant to do that for the 3.1 release but kept putting it off. :-( -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 16:14:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from stade.demon.co.uk (stade.demon.co.uk [158.152.29.164]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F2F14F04 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 16:14:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from aw1@stade.co.uk) Received: (from aw1@localhost) by stade.demon.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.1) id OAA75147; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 14:13:42 GMT (envelope-from aw1) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 14:13:42 +0000 From: Adrian Wontroba To: Gregory Bond Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Summary] Re: CVSup for doc files? Message-ID: <19990313141342.A72642@titus.stade.co.uk> Reply-To: aw1@stade.co.uk References: <199903110451.PAA29601@lightning.itga.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <199903110451.PAA29601@lightning.itga.com.au>; from Gregory Bond on Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 03:51:14PM +1100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT Organization: Yes, I need some of that. X-Phone: +(44) 121 681 6677 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 03:51:14PM +1100, Gregory Bond wrote: > The README.hmtl files in ports are manufactured, not cvsuped: > cd /usr/ports; make readmes > (Clever!) but it currently fails in the japanese/vje-trial port (no Makefile?). try "make -k readmes" (and man make to see what -k does). Look at the pib port if you want a relatively easy way of inspecting port descriptions. "make -k NOCLEANDEPENDS=true clean" in /usr/ports is also quite handy - running make clean for each port, without attempting to clean all the ports each port depends on. -- Adrian Wontroba To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 16:22:58 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from grizzly.fas.com (cc69528-a.mtpls1.sc.home.com [24.6.61.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300A214EC0 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 16:22:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stanb@awod.com) Received: by grizzly.fas.com ($Revision: 1.37.109.23 $/16.2) id AA185410944; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 19:22:24 -0500 Subject: OK, where did rc.local go? To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Stable Mailing List) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 19:22:23 -0500 (EST) From: "Stan Brown" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 706 Message-Id: <19990314002256.300A214EC0@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just installed 3.1 fromthe CD on a machine that have been runign 2.2-STABLE, with the intint of keeping it on track with -STABLE. So where did the functionaly provied by rc.local go? And whats the "right way" to start the xdm task now? -- Stan Brown stanb@netcom.com 843-745-3154 Westvaco Charleston SC. -- Windows 98: n. useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. - (c) 1999 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 16:42:37 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from techpower.net (techpower.net [205.133.231.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1FF14F09 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 16:42:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hometeam@techpower.net) Received: from localhost (hometeam@localhost) by techpower.net (8.9.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA33736; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 19:45:45 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 19:45:45 -0500 (EST) From: hometeam To: Stan Brown Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Subject: Re: OK, where did rc.local go? In-Reply-To: <19990314002256.300A214EC0@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It is rc.conf.local If you need one just create it ...and any rc.conf editing only on /etc/rc.conf , the default /etc/default/rc.conf should not be touched it is your default. On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Stan Brown wrote: > Just installed 3.1 fromthe CD on a machine that have been runign > 2.2-STABLE, with the intint of keeping it on track with -STABLE. > > So where did the functionaly provied by rc.local go? > > And whats the "right way" to start the xdm task now? > > -- > Stan Brown stanb@netcom.com 843-745-3154 > Westvaco > Charleston SC. > -- > Windows 98: n. > useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and > a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system > originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit > company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. > - > (c) 1999 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 17: 9:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334F514E9F for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 17:08:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id KAA29235; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 10:08:44 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <36EB083E.6C01FE8E@newsguy.com> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 09:52:14 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jan B. Koum" Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? References: <32125.921321982@zippy.cdrom.com> <19990313042700.C24467@best.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Jan B. Koum" wrote: > > Doing the nasty thing and switching subject: > Is it just me, or is it now that we have 3.x and 4.x most of > the bug fixes in 4.x never make it back into 3.x? It's just you. Most bug fixes I saw committed to current also went into stable. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "My theory is that his ignorance clouded his poor judgment." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 17:38:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freed.libdns.qc.ca (derby.JSP.UMontreal.CA [132.204.45.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26E514F1D for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 17:38:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from spidey@libdns.qc.ca) Received: from localhost (spidey@localhost) by freed.libdns.qc.ca (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id UAA12384; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 20:37:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from spidey@libdns.qc.ca) X-Authentication-Warning: freed.libdns.qc.ca: spidey owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 20:37:36 -0500 (EST) From: Spidey Reply-To: Spidey To: Stan Brown Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Subject: Re: OK, where did rc.local go? In-Reply-To: <19990314002256.300A214EC0@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I don't personnaly thinkg that there is a 'right way' to start xdm. You can start it from /etc/ttys, and it will be restarted if it crashes. You can also start it from rc.local. It's more a matter of taste than hard evidence. I like to start it from the ttys... On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Stan Brown wrote: > Just installed 3.1 fromthe CD on a machine that have been runign > 2.2-STABLE, with the intint of keeping it on track with -STABLE. > > So where did the functionaly provied by rc.local go? > > And whats the "right way" to start the xdm task now? > > -- > Stan Brown stanb@netcom.com 843-745-3154 > Westvaco > Charleston SC. > -- > Windows 98: n. > useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and > a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system > originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit > company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. > - > (c) 1999 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > When a man lies he murders some part of the world These are the pale deaths which men miscall their lives All this I can witness any longer Cannot the kingdom of salvation take me home To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 18:37:18 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from carbon.marathon.org (carbon.marathon.org [209.180.116.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E17814F66; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:37:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nje@carbon.marathon.org) Received: from localhost (nje@localhost) by carbon.marathon.org (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id TAA49856; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 19:36:41 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from nje@carbon.marathon.org) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 19:36:40 -0700 (MST) From: Nicholas Esborn To: current@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Diskless boot stopping at "NFS ROOT:..." Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a problem I have had on two seperate systems, running 3.0-RELEASE and now 3.1-STABLE built about a week ago. The systems were brought up seperately. Unfortunately since this machine never comes up to any usable state, I don't have detailed logs of its boot output. I'll try to summarize: I compiled the 3.1-S kernel with KERNFORMAT=aout and placed it in /usr/local/netboot/fs/, my NFS rootfs. The following dirs were cpio'd from the host system: drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Mar 13 17:51 bin drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Mar 13 17:52 lkm drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1536 Mar 13 17:52 sbin drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Mar 13 17:52 stand I made usr and cpio'd the following dirs into it: drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 6144 Mar 13 18:03 bin drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Mar 13 18:03 compat drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 3584 Mar 13 18:05 lib drwxr-xr-x 9 root wheel 512 Mar 13 18:05 libdata drwxr-xr-x 7 root wheel 1024 Mar 13 18:07 libexec drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 3584 Mar 13 18:07 sbin drwxr-xr-x 26 root wheel 512 Mar 13 18:15 share I made etc and copied ttys into it. I made the following rc: #!/bin/sh echo 'STARTING UP' PATH=/bin:/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/X11R6/bin export PATH ifconfig lo0 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xffffffff mount -t nfs -u 10.0.0.1:/export/boot/fs / mount -a /sbin/ldconfig -elf /usr/lib /usr/lib/compat /usr/X11R6/lib while [ 1 -eq 1 ]; do /usr/X11R6/bin/XF86_S3 -bpp 16 -query deimos done The mounting stuff may be problematic, but it doesn't look like rc is even running... The clients find the kernel and start booting, goes through its bootpc configuration obtaining all the right numbers, prints: NFS ROOT: 10.0.0.1:/usr/local/netboot/fs and stops. I have to hard power cycle the client. The kernel is GENERIC with BOOTP, BOOTP_NFSROOT, "BOOTP_NFSV3", and BOOTP_COMPAT. I can't tell if the nfs flags are getting set in the kernel, as the machine never comes up to a shell. Here's the irony: I can currently get 2.2.x booting through almost the same procedures and setups (only differing where 2.2.x and 3.x features differ). Any ideas? Thank you for your time either way. Please respond to me by email as I'm not on the mailing lists. Nick Esborn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 18:56:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E9E14F31 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:56:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA05886; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:56:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: Rahul Dhesi Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 13 Mar 1999 14:08:38 PST." <199903132208.AA24401@waltz.rahul.net> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 18:56:24 -0800 Message-ID: <5884.921380184@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Just my opinion: The next major release of FreeBSD 3.x should be so > reliable and bug-free that sites can install it and have a high degree > of confidence that they won't need to apply any bug fixes for at least 6 > months. That's a fine general thing to want, but it still tells me nothing about scheduling and that's what this thread is all about. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 19:54:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C5E14F8D for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 19:54:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA06025; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 19:55:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) To: "Stan Brown" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Stable Mailing List) Subject: Re: OK, where did rc.local go? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 13 Mar 1999 19:22:23 EST." <19990314002256.300A214EC0@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 19:55:04 -0800 Message-ID: <6023.921383704@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > So where did the functionaly provied by rc.local go? It's still there, if you want it. Did you try actually creating a file called /etc/rc.local? :-) > And whats the "right way" to start the xdm task now? I always start mine from /etc/ttys, but others scream that this is evil. I don't care. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 20:53:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from grizzly.fas.com (cc69528-a.mtpls1.sc.home.com [24.6.61.166]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3562F14D7E for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 20:53:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stanb@awod.com) Received: by grizzly.fas.com ($Revision: 1.37.109.23 $/16.2) id AA135207183; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 23:53:03 -0500 Subject: Why don't my other machines see rwho packets from 3.x machines? To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Stable Mailing List) Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 23:53:02 -0500 (EST) From: "Stan Brown" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 858 Message-Id: <19990314045328.3562F14D7E@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I just noticed that _none_ of my other machines, including a 2.2.8 FreeBSD machine, are seeing the rwho packets from my 3.0, and 3.1 FreeBSD machines. I looked at the man page, nited the -m option, and tried it even though it appeared that the backwards compatible way was without it. This did not fix anything. Hmm, now that i look the 2 3.x machines are not even seing each other! -- Stan Brown stanb@netcom.com 843-745-3154 Westvaco Charleston SC. -- Windows 98: n. useless extension to a minor patch release for 32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a 16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor, written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for 1 bit of competition. - (c) 1999 Stan Brown. Redistribution via the Microsoft Network is prohibited. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 21:44:31 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pwrtc.com (pwrtc.com [206.230.144.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7769B14F3B for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 21:43:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pazuzu@amphigory.com) Received: from legba.pwrtc.com (legba.pwrtc.com [206.230.144.223]) by pwrtc.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA21408 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 00:43:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (root@localhost) by legba.pwrtc.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA28497 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 00:42:54 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <199903140542.AAA28497@legba.pwrtc.com> X-SMTP: hello Erzulie from pazuzu@amphigory.com server @erzulie ip 192.168.1.2 X-Sender: pazuzu@legba (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0 Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 00:43:08 -0500 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: "Jon M. Craig (Pazuzu)" Subject: Wine under 3.1-RELEASE? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Does anyone have any idea when the port for Wine will be updated to a more current version? It's at 990214 now, yet the latest version of Wine is actually 990226. Also - I've tried to compike 990226 but not had any success, has anyone got it to compile? (I get a stop message complaining about a few undefined identifiers). Another problem - during the ./configure phase, there is a warning about a non-reentrant libc - yet I have libc_r installed... Any idea how to fix this warning? On the bright side - I've had a lot of success running things under the Wine version on the CD (990131 I think). If I can get just a few more things working I can dump Windoze, as the only reason I run it is app availability. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 22:12:53 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.HiWAAY.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E8714E30 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 22:12:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (tnt8-216-180-15-229.dialup.HiWAAY.net [216.180.15.229]) by mail.HiWAAY.net (8.9.1a/8.9.0) with ESMTP id AAA08206; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 00:12:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from nospam.hiwaay.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nospam.hiwaay.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id AAA90422; Sun, 14 Mar 1999 00:12:29 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net) Message-Id: <199903140612.AAA90422@nospam.hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: "Stan Brown" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG (FreeBSD Stable Mailing List) From: David Kelly Subject: Re: Why don't my other machines see rwho packets from 3.x machines? In-reply-to: Message from "Stan Brown" of "Sat, 13 Mar 1999 23:53:02 EST." <19990314045328.3562F14D7E@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 00:12:29 -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Stan Brown" writes: > I just noticed that _none_ of my other machines, including a 2.2.8 > FreeBSD machine, are seeing the rwho packets from my 3.0, and 3.1 > FreeBSD machines. > > I looked at the man page, nited the -m option, and tried it even though > it appeared that the backwards compatible way was without it. This did > not fix anything. > > Hmm, now that i look the 2 3.x machines are not even seing each other! Any chance they have a router in between? I don't believe the rwho/ ruptime stuff will go thru a router. Nor will timed. At least not thru the routers at work (which I have no control over). -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@nospam.hiwaay.net ===================================================================== The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 23:20:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.fidnet.com (three.FIDNET.COM [205.216.200.53]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67EF514F13 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 23:20:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yoonix@fidnet.com) Received: (qmail 15157 invoked from network); 14 Mar 1999 07:20:05 -0000 Received: from two.fidnet.com (205.216.200.52) by three.fidnet.com with SMTP; 14 Mar 1999 07:20:05 -0000 Date: Sun, 14 Mar 1999 01:20:05 -0600 (EST) From: Mark Turpin To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: problems with 2.2.8->3.1-stable Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-657640248-452093866-921396005=:9058" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. ---657640248-452093866-921396005=:9058 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Trying to upgrade to 3.1-stable from 2.2.8-stable. Attached is the problem I'm coming up with. I started at: >>> elf make world started on Sat Mar 13 23:44:17 CST 1999 Right after I finished cvsup'ing the src's for 3.1-stable. Mark yoonix@fidnet.com 800.392.8070 x214 ---657640248-452093866-921396005=:9058 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="error.mesg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="error.mesg" LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0NCj4+PiBSZWJ1aWxkaW5nIGJvb3RzdHJhcCBs aWJyYXJpZXMNCi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tDQpjZCAvdXNyL3NyYzsNClBB VEg9L3Vzci9vYmovdXNyL3NyYy90bXAvc2JpbjovdXNyL29iai91c3Ivc3Jj L3RtcC91c3Ivc2JpbjovdXNyL29iai91c3Ivc3JjL3RtcC9iaW46L3Vzci9v YmovdXNyL3NyYy90bXAvdXNyL2Jpbjovc2JpbjovYmluOi91c3Ivc2Jpbjov dXNyL2JpbjovdXNyL2dhbWVzOi91c3IvbG9jYWwvYmluOi91c3IvWDExUjYv YmluOi91c3IvaG9tZS9tYXJrL2Jpbg0KQklTT05fU0lNUExFPS91c3Ivb2Jq L3Vzci9zcmMvdG1wL3Vzci9zaGFyZS9taXNjL2Jpc29uLnNpbXBsZQ0KQ09N UElMRVJfUEFUSD0vdXNyL29iai91c3Ivc3JjL3RtcC91c3IvbGliZXhlYzov dXNyL29iai91c3Ivc3JjL3RtcC91c3IvYmluDQpHQ0NfRVhFQ19QUkVGSVg9 L3Vzci9vYmovdXNyL3NyYy90bXAvdXNyL2xpYjovdXNyL29iai91c3Ivc3Jj L3RtcC91c3IvbGliLyAgTERfTElCUkFSWV9QQVRIPS91c3Ivb2JqL3Vzci9z cmMvdG1wL3Vzci9saWINCkxJQlJBUllfUEFUSD0vdXNyL29iai91c3Ivc3Jj L3RtcC91c3IvbGliOi91c3Ivb2JqL3Vzci9zcmMvdG1wL3Vzci9saWIgTk9F WFRSQURFUEVORD10DQpPQkpGT1JNQVRfUEFUSD0vdXNyL29iai91c3Ivc3Jj L3RtcC91c3IvbGliZXhlYzovdXNyL2xpYmV4ZWMgL3Vzci9vYmovdXNyL3Ny Yy90bXAvdXNyL2Jpbi9tYWtlIERFU1RESVI9L3Vzci9vYmovdXNyL3NyYy90 bXAgLWYNCk1ha2VmaWxlLmluYzEgYm9vdHN0cmFwLWxpYnJhcmllcw0KY2Qg L3Vzci9zcmMvbGliL2NzdS9pMzg2LWVsZjsgIC91c3Ivb2JqL3Vzci9zcmMv dG1wL3Vzci9iaW4vbWFrZSAtRE5PSU5GTyAtRE5PTUFOIC1ETk9QSUMgLURO T1BST0ZJTEUgLUROT1NIQVJFRCBjbGVhbmRlcGVuZDsNCi91c3Ivb2JqL3Vz ci9zcmMvdG1wL3Vzci9iaW4vbWFrZSAtRE5PSU5GTyAtRE5PTUFOIC1ETk9Q SUMgLUROT1BST0ZJTEUgLUROT1NIQVJFRCBhbGw7ICAvdXNyL29iai91c3Iv c3JjL3RtcC91c3IvYmluL21ha2UNCi1ETk9JTkZPIC1ETk9NQU4gLUROT1BJ QyAtRE5PUFJPRklMRSAtRE5PU0hBUkVEIC1CIGluc3RhbGwgY2xlYW5kaXIg b2JqDQpybSAtZiAuZGVwZW5kIC91c3Ivb2JqL3Vzci9zcmMvbGliL2NzdS9p Mzg2LWVsZi9HUEFUSCAvdXNyL29iai91c3Ivc3JjL2xpYi9jc3UvaTM4Ni1l bGYvR1JUQUdTDQovdXNyL29iai91c3Ivc3JjL2xpYi9jc3UvaTM4Ni1lbGYv R1NZTVMgL3Vzci9vYmovdXNyL3NyYy9saWIvY3N1L2kzODYtZWxmL0dUQUdT DQpjYyAtTyAtcGlwZSAtZWxmIC1XYWxsIC1Xbm8tdW51c2VkIC1JL3Vzci9v YmovdXNyL3NyYy90bXAvdXNyL2luY2x1ZGUgLWMgL3Vzci9zcmMvbGliL2Nz dS9pMzg2LWVsZi9jcnQxLmMgLW8gY3J0MS5vDQpjYyAtTyAtcGlwZSAtZWxm IC1XYWxsIC1Xbm8tdW51c2VkIC1JL3Vzci9vYmovdXNyL3NyYy90bXAvdXNy L2luY2x1ZGUgLWMgL3Vzci9zcmMvbGliL2NzdS9pMzg2LWVsZi9jcnRiZWdp bi5jIC1vIGNydGJlZ2luLm8NCi91c3Ivc3JjL2xpYi9jc3UvaTM4Ni1lbGYv Y3J0YmVnaW4uYzozMDogc2VjdGlvbiBhdHRyaWJ1dGVzIGFyZSBub3Qgc3Vw cG9ydGVkIGZvciB0aGlzIHRhcmdldA0KL3Vzci9zcmMvbGliL2NzdS9pMzg2 LWVsZi9jcnRiZWdpbi5jOjMxOiBzZWN0aW9uIGF0dHJpYnV0ZXMgYXJlIG5v dCBzdXBwb3J0ZWQgZm9yIHRoaXMgdGFyZ2V0DQp7c3RhbmRhcmQgaW5wdXR9 OiBBc3NlbWJsZXIgbWVzc2FnZXM6DQp7c3RhbmRhcmQgaW5wdXR9OjczOiBF cnJvcjogVW5rbm93biBwc2V1ZG8tb3A6ICBgLnNlY3Rpb24nDQoqKiogRXJy b3IgY29kZSAxDQoNClN0b3AuDQoqKiogRXJyb3IgY29kZSAxDQoNClN0b3Au DQoqKiogRXJyb3IgY29kZSAxDQoNClN0b3AuDQoqKiogRXJyb3IgY29kZSAx DQoNClN0b3AuDQoqKiogRXJyb3IgY29kZSAxDQoNClN0b3AuDQo= ---657640248-452093866-921396005=:9058-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Mar 13 23:26:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles361.castles.com [208.214.167.61]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259BA14FD9 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 23:26:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA06192; Sat, 13 Mar 1999 23:20:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199903140720.XAA06192@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Rahul Dhesi Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What do people think of May 1st for a 3.2 release date? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 13 Mar 1999 14:08:38 PST." <199903132208.AA24401@waltz.rahul.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 13 Mar 1999 23:20:43 -0800 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Just my opinion: The next major release of FreeBSD 3.x should be so > reliable and bug-free that sites can install it and have a high degree > of confidence that they won't need to apply any bug fixes for at least 6 > months. > > Since there have already been two releases (3.0 and 3.1) which served as > test releases, the time is now ripe for one matching the description > above. That sounds like a wonderful idea. Are you volunteering the labour to help achieve this goal? -- \\ Sometimes you're ahead, \\ Mike Smith \\ sometimes you're behind. \\ mike@smith.net.au \\ The race is long, and in the \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ end it's only with yourself. \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message