From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Sep 25 14:33:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E5837B422 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 14:33:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e8PLWhc08103; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 14:32:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 14:32:43 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: "O. Hartmann" Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fortran 90/95 problems ... Message-ID: <20000925143243.I9141@fw.wintelcom.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: ; from ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de on Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 11:24:19PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * O. Hartmann [000925 14:23] wrote: > Dear Sirs. > A few weeks ago, I installed sucessfully Lahey/Fujitsu Fortran95 > compiler on our FreeBSD/SMP box running FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE. I > compiled a testbed (a simulation model of particel's collision) > under this compiler an it worked well, I could compile this program > and run it. > > Several days ago, some kernel patches were made, and I remember > some Linux code was updated (Lahey/Fujitsu Fortran 95 compiler is > to be run under Linux emulation!). > > Since then Lahey/Fujitsu F95 compiler does strange things. It > compiles code three time and loose some options. When starting > "lf95 -tpp ddscat" or compile some application we developed here > and compiled them successfully three weeks ago, lf95 starts compiling, > but the it compiles the stuff a second and third time and whenever > it starts an additional, unnecessary round, it outputs some error > messages about the unknown option "pp", it loose obviously the > preceding t. But why? This phenomenon occurs on two machine, one > SMP server and one UP system (K6-2). > > I wiped out completely my linux-emulation packages and installed > them again. Nothing happened in another way. This seems to me to > be some breakages in the code donated these days to the stable > kernel ... > Please wrap lines at 70 characters. This belongs on -stable or -emulation, I've repaired the format and reposted to -emulation. I'm sorry to hear it's not working right for you anymore. :( -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Sep 25 14:38:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de (ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E69237B422 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 14:38:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE (ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.54]) by ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e8PLe1N42917; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 23:40:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 23:40:01 +0200 (CEST) From: "O. Hartmann" To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fortran 90/95 problems ... In-Reply-To: <20000925143243.I9141@fw.wintelcom.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: Thank you very much. Well, the problem of wrapping line formate does not occur to me, why? I definitely wrap lines at 60 characters ... :-( Yes, it's not a very good message about the compiler, because one of our new professors wants to start modelling on low cost systems. I prefer FreeBSD if there have to be Intel-based architecture, and getting a working and reliable F90 compiler is very,very important ... :>* O. Hartmann [000925 14:23] wrote: :>> Dear Sirs. :>> A few weeks ago, I installed sucessfully Lahey/Fujitsu Fortran95 :>> compiler on our FreeBSD/SMP box running FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE. I :>> compiled a testbed (a simulation model of particel's collision) :>> under this compiler an it worked well, I could compile this program :>> and run it. :>> :>> Several days ago, some kernel patches were made, and I remember :>> some Linux code was updated (Lahey/Fujitsu Fortran 95 compiler is :>> to be run under Linux emulation!). :>> :>> Since then Lahey/Fujitsu F95 compiler does strange things. It :>> compiles code three time and loose some options. When starting :>> "lf95 -tpp ddscat" or compile some application we developed here :>> and compiled them successfully three weeks ago, lf95 starts compiling, :>> but the it compiles the stuff a second and third time and whenever :>> it starts an additional, unnecessary round, it outputs some error :>> messages about the unknown option "pp", it loose obviously the :>> preceding t. But why? This phenomenon occurs on two machine, one :>> SMP server and one UP system (K6-2). :>> :>> I wiped out completely my linux-emulation packages and installed :>> them again. Nothing happened in another way. This seems to me to :>> be some breakages in the code donated these days to the stable :>> kernel ... :>> :> :>Please wrap lines at 70 characters. :> :>This belongs on -stable or -emulation, I've repaired the format and :>reposted to -emulation. :> :>I'm sorry to hear it's not working right for you anymore. :( :> :>-- :>-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] :>"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." :> Gruss O. Hartmann ------------------------------------------------------------------- ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de Klimadatenserver des IPA, Universitaet Mainz Netzwerk- und Systembetreuung To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Sep 25 14:41:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFA637B424 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 14:41:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e8PLe7908387; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 14:40:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 14:40:07 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: "O. Hartmann" Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fortran 90/95 problems ... Message-ID: <20000925144006.K9141@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20000925143243.I9141@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: ; from ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de on Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 11:40:01PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * O. Hartmann [000925 14:38] wrote: > On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Thank you very much. > > Well, the problem of wrapping line formate does not occur to me, why? > I definitely wrap lines at 60 characters ... :-( > > Yes, it's not a very good message about the compiler, because > one of our new professors wants to start modelling on low cost > systems. I prefer FreeBSD if there have to be Intel-based > architecture, and getting a working and reliable F90 compiler > is very,very important ... For the time being, I would suggest downgrading to the last known working point and filing a bug report via the GNATS system: send-pr -or- http://www.FreeBSD.org/send-pr.html -Alfred > :>* O. Hartmann [000925 14:23] wrote: > :>> Dear Sirs. > :>> A few weeks ago, I installed sucessfully Lahey/Fujitsu Fortran95 > :>> compiler on our FreeBSD/SMP box running FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE. I > :>> compiled a testbed (a simulation model of particel's collision) > :>> under this compiler an it worked well, I could compile this program > :>> and run it. > :>> > :>> Several days ago, some kernel patches were made, and I remember > :>> some Linux code was updated (Lahey/Fujitsu Fortran 95 compiler is > :>> to be run under Linux emulation!). > :>> > :>> Since then Lahey/Fujitsu F95 compiler does strange things. It > :>> compiles code three time and loose some options. When starting > :>> "lf95 -tpp ddscat" or compile some application we developed here > :>> and compiled them successfully three weeks ago, lf95 starts compiling, > :>> but the it compiles the stuff a second and third time and whenever > :>> it starts an additional, unnecessary round, it outputs some error > :>> messages about the unknown option "pp", it loose obviously the > :>> preceding t. But why? This phenomenon occurs on two machine, one > :>> SMP server and one UP system (K6-2). > :>> > :>> I wiped out completely my linux-emulation packages and installed > :>> them again. Nothing happened in another way. This seems to me to > :>> be some breakages in the code donated these days to the stable > :>> kernel ... > :>> > :> > :>Please wrap lines at 70 characters. > :> > :>This belongs on -stable or -emulation, I've repaired the format and > :>reposted to -emulation. > :> > :>I'm sorry to hear it's not working right for you anymore. :( > :> > :>-- > :>-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] > :>"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." > :> > > Gruss O. Hartmann > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de > > Klimadatenserver des IPA, Universitaet Mainz > Netzwerk- und Systembetreuung -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Sep 25 15: 2:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from palrel1.hp.com (palrel1.hp.com [156.153.255.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D6B37B424 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 15:01:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from adlmail.cup.hp.com (adlmail.cup.hp.com [15.0.100.30]) by palrel1.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1617F634; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 15:01:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cup.hp.com (gauss.cup.hp.com [15.28.97.152]) by adlmail.cup.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.9.3 SMKit7.02) with ESMTP id OAA00223; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 14:59:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <39CFCADD.445E19E@cup.hp.com> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 17:59:57 -0400 From: Marcel Moolenaar Organization: Hewlett-Packard X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: "O. Hartmann" , emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fortran 90/95 problems ... References: <20000925143243.I9141@fw.wintelcom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Alfred Perlstein wrote (well, forwarded actually): > > A few weeks ago, I installed sucessfully Lahey/Fujitsu Fortran95 > > compiler on our FreeBSD/SMP box running FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE. [snip] > > Several days ago, some kernel patches were made, and I remember > > some Linux code was updated (Lahey/Fujitsu Fortran 95 compiler is > > to be run under Linux emulation!). There are *no* changes to the Linuxulator in -stable. Please be more precise. -- Marcel Moolenaar mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org tel: (408) 447-4222 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Sep 25 15:37: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de (ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7394637B422 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 15:37:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE (ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.54]) by ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e8PMYDp01032; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:34:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:34:13 +0200 (CEST) From: "O. Hartmann" To: Marcel Moolenaar Cc: Alfred Perlstein , emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fortran 90/95 problems ... In-Reply-To: <39CFCADD.445E19E@cup.hp.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: Well, sorry about the confusing linewrap, there is a problem and I can not solve it. i try to shorten the lines by hand and hope they are delivered as is ... Whenever I receive a cvsup task, I obtain an Email. I do not make notifications on when some files were changed here, because cvsupdate is running every second day. As I remember, within the last two weeks, maybe in the last week, there have been changes to some files belonging to sys/linux. These files were updated: ./i386/linux/linprocfs ./i386/linux/linprocfs/linprocfs.h ./i386/linux/linprocfs/linprocfs_misc.c ./i386/linux/linprocfs/linprocfs_subr.c ./i386/linux/linprocfs/linprocfs_vfsops.c ./i386/linux/linprocfs/linprocfs_vnops.c I do not know, whether they caused the problems, but it was simply an idea. And as you can see - changes has been made, definitely! :>Alfred Perlstein wrote (well, forwarded actually): :> :>> > A few weeks ago, I installed sucessfully Lahey/Fujitsu Fortran95 :>> > compiler on our FreeBSD/SMP box running FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE. :>[snip] :>> > Several days ago, some kernel patches were made, and I remember :>> > some Linux code was updated (Lahey/Fujitsu Fortran 95 compiler is :>> > to be run under Linux emulation!). :> :>There are *no* changes to the Linuxulator in -stable. Please be more :>precise. :> :>-- :>Marcel Moolenaar :> mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org :> tel: (408) 447-4222 :> Gruss O. Hartmann ------------------------------------------------------------------- ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de Klimadatenserver des IPA, Universitaet Mainz Netzwerk- und Systembetreuung To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Sep 25 15:52:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from palrel3.hp.com (palrel3.hp.com [156.153.255.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A9437B42C for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 15:52:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from adlmail.cup.hp.com (adlmail.cup.hp.com [15.0.100.30]) by palrel3.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52794691; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 15:52:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cup.hp.com (gauss.cup.hp.com [15.28.97.152]) by adlmail.cup.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.9.3 SMKit7.02) with ESMTP id PAA02927; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 15:52:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <39CFD728.940E74A2@cup.hp.com> Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2000 18:52:24 -0400 From: Marcel Moolenaar Organization: Hewlett-Packard X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "O. Hartmann" Cc: Alfred Perlstein , emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fortran 90/95 problems ... References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "O. Hartmann" wrote: > > As I remember, within the last two weeks, maybe in the last week, there > have been changes to some files belonging to sys/linux. > These files were updated: > > ./i386/linux/linprocfs > ./i386/linux/linprocfs/linprocfs.h > ./i386/linux/linprocfs/linprocfs_misc.c > ./i386/linux/linprocfs/linprocfs_subr.c > ./i386/linux/linprocfs/linprocfs_vfsops.c > ./i386/linux/linprocfs/linprocfs_vnops.c > > I do not know, whether they caused the problems, but it was simply an idea. > And as you can see - changes has been made, definitely! Ah, I see. I do not consider linprocfs as the Linuxulator. It's a module of its own and should be located somewhere else. For linprocfs related issues, contact des@FreeBSD.org. Since the Fortran compiler has problems with its commandline options, changes are that linprocfs might be broken. -- Marcel Moolenaar mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org tel: (408) 447-4222 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Mon Sep 25 21:26:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from eddings.acpub.duke.edu (eddings.acpub.duke.edu [152.3.233.76]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A0137B422 for ; Mon, 25 Sep 2000 21:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bobzilla.adsl.duke.edu (bobzilla.adsl.duke.edu [152.16.67.15]) by eddings.acpub.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/Duke-5.0.0) with ESMTP id AAA06865; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:26:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from sto@localhost) by bobzilla.adsl.duke.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e8Q4QAR08457; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:26:10 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from sto) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 00:26:10 -0400 From: "Sean O'Connell" To: "O. Hartmann" Cc: FreeBSD emulation Subject: Re: Fortran 90/95 problems ... Message-ID: <20000926002610.H8290@stat.Duke.EDU> Reply-To: "Sean O'Connell" References: <20000925143243.I9141@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de on Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 11:40:01PM +0200 X-Organization: House of Schmutzli X-Kitties: Bitty Maya CJ Keisha Jacob Hopey X-Hound: Bob X-OS-of-Choice: FreeBSD Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org O. Hartmann stated: : On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: : Thank you very much. : : Well, the problem of wrapping line formate does not occur to me, why? : I definitely wrap lines at 60 characters ... :-( : : Yes, it's not a very good message about the compiler, because : one of our new professors wants to start modelling on low cost : systems. I prefer FreeBSD if there have to be Intel-based : architecture, and getting a working and reliable F90 compiler : is very,very important ... Why not use a native FreeBSD F90/F95 compiler. NAG makes one (I deploy it here in the department). It does cose some $$, but for academic uses it relatively inexpensive. I hope I am not the only person in the world buying it :( You can request a demo. http://www.nag.com/nagware/np/np%5Ftrial.html HTH, S PS. Sorry I am not in anyway affiliated with NAG. F90/5 is something that I have to deliver or I will have to pull up tent stakes and move camp... blegh. -- 1--------01---------01--------01--------01--------01--------01--------0 Sean O'Connell sean@stat.Duke.EDU To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Sep 26 3:55:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de (ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB40837B422 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 03:55:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE (ipamzlx.Physik.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.180.54]) by ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e8QAv3h04623; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 12:57:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de) Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 12:57:03 +0200 (CEST) From: "O. Hartmann" To: "Sean O'Connell" Cc: FreeBSD emulation Subject: Re: Fortran 90/95 problems ... In-Reply-To: <20000926002610.H8290@stat.Duke.EDU> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Sean O'Connell wrote: Dera Mr. O'Connell. Thank you very much for that hint. Just this morning NAG's compiler came into some discussions and for that, I will checkk it. Thanks. Oliver :>O. Hartmann stated: :>: On Mon, 25 Sep 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote: :>: Thank you very much. :>: :>: Well, the problem of wrapping line formate does not occur to me, why? :>: I definitely wrap lines at 60 characters ... :-( :>: :>: Yes, it's not a very good message about the compiler, because :>: one of our new professors wants to start modelling on low cost :>: systems. I prefer FreeBSD if there have to be Intel-based :>: architecture, and getting a working and reliable F90 compiler :>: is very,very important ... :> :>Why not use a native FreeBSD F90/F95 compiler. NAG makes one :>(I deploy it here in the department). It does cose some $$, but :>for academic uses it relatively inexpensive. I hope I am not :>the only person in the world buying it :( :> :>You can request a demo. :> :>http://www.nag.com/nagware/np/np%5Ftrial.html :> :>HTH, :>S :> :>PS. Sorry I am not in anyway affiliated with NAG. F90/5 is :> something that I have to deliver or I will have to pull :> up tent stakes and move camp... blegh. :> :>-- :>1--------01---------01--------01--------01--------01--------01--------0 :>Sean O'Connell sean@stat.Duke.EDU :> Gruss O. Hartmann ------------------------------------------------------------------- ohartman@ipamzlx.physik.uni-mainz.de Klimadatenserver des IPA, Universitaet Mainz Netzwerk- und Systembetreuung To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Tue Sep 26 14:21:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mail.freebsd.org (e-168-IP44.empnet.net [208.205.168.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4532E37B423 for ; Tue, 26 Sep 2000 14:21:14 -0700 (PDT) From: "Frank Duyshart" Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 14:22:19 X-Mailer: Prospect Mailer 2000 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Inquiry re low cost health/life insurance MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20000926212114.4532E37B423@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Health Insurance premiums are going out of sight. . All insurance companies are trying to control their rising costs by cutting back on benefits, raising deductibles, and by raising their premiums. It is common for employees on an employer provided health plan to pay $400 per month, and very often much more, to cover the family. Lately, many small employers have received notice that their small group employee plan will be cancelled. But for those of us who are healthy, and who understand that health insurance is to protect us from the major, and often catastrophic, medical expenses that are usually completely unexpected, there is an excellent alternative. And for those of us who are healthy and don't use tobacco products, there is one insurance company which gives us a really big break in premiums. For example, a 25 year old male or female, non-smoker, in good health: $53 per month or: a 35 year old male or female, non-smoker, in reasonably good health: $67 per month or: a 45 year old non-smoker, male or female, in reasonably good health: $94 per month or: a healthy couple, each 40 years old, non-smokers, with 2 children: $205 per month or: a couple, each 55 years old, non smoklers, no kids at home: $278 per month The above is based on a $1000 deductible, Fortis Series 1000 PPO Health Plan, and is for OREGON RESIDENTS ONLY. Rates vary with age and plan selected. To find out more about this excellent health plan, or about low cost level premium term life insurance, email me at duyshart@hotmail.com Please include your AGE, AGE of SPOUSE, NUMBER of CHILDREN, and WHETHER YOU USE TOBACCO. If this was sent in error, please accept my apologies and email me to be removed from the list. If you are looking for truly cheap international telephone rates, and an income producing opportunity, visit my website: http://internationalcheaptalk.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Sep 27 9:21:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458E437B422 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 09:21:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from bright@localhost) by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e8RGLss19554; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 09:21:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 09:21:54 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Daryl Chance Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Installing additional Linux shared objects (was: Re: xview) Message-ID: <20000927092154.U9141@fw.wintelcom.net> References: <20000927165235.B1191@sebster.com> <01d401c02894$588d4ce0$0200000a@mike> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <01d401c02894$588d4ce0$0200000a@mike>; from dchance@valuedata.net on Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 10:05:16AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > HTH, > -------------------------------------------------------- > | Daryl Chance | I have made this letter longer then | > | Valuedata, LLC | usual because I lacked the time to | > | Memphis, TN | make it shorter. -- Blaise Pascal | > -------------------------------------------------------- > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Sebastiaan van Erk" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 9:52 AM > Subject: xview > > > > Hi there! > > > > I'm running FreeBSD 4.1 stable with linux emulation and I need to run a > > linux binary that needs xview (libxview.so.3). Is it possible to install > > the FreeBSD xview port, or must the linux version be installed? If the > > latter is the case, how do I get the linux version of xview installed > > in the right path? Just download the rpm and use some path options? * Daryl Chance [000927 08:08] wrote: > install FreeBSD 3.X compatablity (/stand/sysinstall) Moved to -emulation. That won't work for a Linux binary, I've come across this problem myself, is there a way to install a Linux RPM into the /compat/linux "properly" I mean like the linux_base port does? thanks, -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Sep 27 12:10:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from eeyore.sebster.com (d5019.dtk.chello.nl [213.46.5.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA8F237B422 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 12:10:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 16736 invoked by uid 1000); 27 Sep 2000 19:10:22 -0000 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 21:10:22 +0200 From: Sebastiaan van Erk To: freebsd-emulation@freeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Installing additional Linux shared objects (was: Re: xview) Message-ID: <20000927211022.B13249@sebster.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi there! > Moved to -emulation. > > That won't work for a Linux binary, I've come across this problem myself, > is there a way to install a Linux RPM into the /compat/linux "properly" > I mean like the linux_base port does? Well I checked out how linux base does it, and it's like this: rpm --root /usr/compat/linux --ignoreos --install However, the linux_base port also cleaned out /usr/compat/linux/tmp, /usr/compat/linux/var/tmp, /usr/compat/linux/dev, etc., which can cause the installation scripts of your rpm to complain quite loudly and fail anyway. For xview I made temporary versions of these dirs and files (and no, you cannot symlink them because the --root flags does a chroot). It's not nice, so if anyone knows a BETTER way to do this, I'm interested. But xview works. Greetings, Seb* To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Sep 27 12:43:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from sol.cc.u-szeged.hu (sol.cc.u-szeged.hu [160.114.8.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A168437B423 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 12:43:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from petra.hos.u-szeged.hu by sol.cc.u-szeged.hu (8.9.3+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id VAA13757; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 21:43:55 +0200 (MEST) Received: from sziszi by petra.hos.u-szeged.hu with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 13eN6u-00073K-00 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 21:43:20 +0200 Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 21:43:20 +0200 From: Szilveszter Adam To: freebsd-emulation@freeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Installing additional Linux shared objects (was: Re: xview) Message-ID: <20000927214320.A26312@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-emulation@freeBSD.ORG References: <20000927211022.B13249@sebster.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000927211022.B13249@sebster.com>; from sebster@sebster.com on Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 09:10:22PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi! On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 09:10:22PM +0200, Sebastiaan van Erk wrote: > and fail anyway. For xview I made temporary versions of these dirs > and files (and no, you cannot symlink them because the --root flags > does a chroot). It's not nice, so if anyone knows a BETTER way to > do this, I'm interested. But xview works. Uhm, am I the only one who would consider rpm2cpio? -- Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Szeged University Szeged Hungary To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Sep 27 12:52:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-63-206-90-224.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.206.90.224]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB2C37B42C for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 12:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id e8RJrkA05742; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 12:53:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200009271953.e8RJrkA05742@mass.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Szilveszter Adam Cc: freebsd-emulation@freeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Installing additional Linux shared objects (was: Re: xview) In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 27 Sep 2000 21:43:20 +0200." <20000927214320.A26312@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 12:53:46 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Hi! > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 09:10:22PM +0200, Sebastiaan van Erk wrote: > > > and fail anyway. For xview I made temporary versions of these dirs > > and files (and no, you cannot symlink them because the --root flags > > does a chroot). It's not nice, so if anyone knows a BETTER way to > > do this, I'm interested. But xview works. > > Uhm, am I the only one who would consider rpm2cpio? Yes. The whole point behind using rpm is so that other applications that depend on the rpm database being accurate have one to work with. (eg. installing other stuff) It *should* be possible to install a Linux app using the Linux rpm binary (this is how most of the linux_lib stuff should be installed, and AFAIK it is...) -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Wed Sep 27 12:57:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from palrel3.hp.com (palrel3.hp.com [156.153.255.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A7937B424 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 12:57:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from adlmail.cup.hp.com (adlmail.cup.hp.com [15.0.100.30]) by palrel3.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E99D9B; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 12:57:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cup.hp.com (gauss.cup.hp.com [15.28.97.152]) by adlmail.cup.hp.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18546)/8.9.3 SMKit7.02) with ESMTP id MAA23650; Wed, 27 Sep 2000 12:57:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <39D2510F.5E9607DC@cup.hp.com> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 15:57:03 -0400 From: Marcel Moolenaar Organization: Hewlett-Packard X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sebastiaan van Erk Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Installing additional Linux shared objects (was: Re: xview) References: <20000927211022.B13249@sebster.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Sebastiaan van Erk wrote: > > Well I checked out how linux base does it, and it's like this: > > rpm --root /usr/compat/linux --ignoreos --install > > However, the linux_base port also cleaned out /usr/compat/linux/tmp, > /usr/compat/linux/var/tmp, /usr/compat/linux/dev, etc., which can > cause the installation scripts of your rpm to complain quite loudly > and fail anyway. For xview I made temporary versions of these dirs > and files (and no, you cannot symlink them because the --root flags > does a chroot). It's not nice, so if anyone knows a BETTER way to > do this, I'm interested. But xview works. If you know you don't need to use the FreeBSD native port of rpm, you can run /compat/linux/bin/rpm. The problem is that the Linux rpm (v3.x) converts the database into a format not understandably by the FreeBSD native rpm (v2.5.x). We need to upgrade our rpm port. With the Linux version it's as simple as: /compat/linux/bin/rpm -i foobar.rpm -- Marcel Moolenaar mail: marcel@cup.hp.com / marcel@FreeBSD.org tel: (408) 447-4222 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Thu Sep 28 6:18: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB96A37B424 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 06:17:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA67687; Thu, 28 Sep 2000 15:13:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des@ofug.org) X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/ X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily coincide with those of any organisation or company with which I am or have been affiliated. To: Marcel Moolenaar Cc: Sebastiaan van Erk , freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Installing additional Linux shared objects (was: Re: xview) References: <20000927211022.B13249@sebster.com> <39D2510F.5E9607DC@cup.hp.com> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 28 Sep 2000 15:13:52 +0200 In-Reply-To: Marcel Moolenaar's message of "Wed, 27 Sep 2000 15:57:03 -0400" Message-ID: Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Marcel Moolenaar writes: > /compat/linux/bin/rpm -i foobar.rpm Funny - the rpm man page (Red Hat 6.0) says -i is short for --initdb, whereas the usage message printed by rpm on the same machine says it's short for --install. Go figure. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-emulation Sat Sep 30 11:48:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mail.disney.com (mail.disney.com [204.128.192.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D5237B502 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 11:48:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pain10.corp.disney.com (root@pain10.corp.disney.com [153.7.110.100]) by mail.disney.com (Switch-2.0.1/Switch-2.0.1) with SMTP id e8UImQR18059 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 11:48:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from louie.fa.disney.com by pain.corp.disney.com with ESMTP for freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 11:48:58 -0700 Received: from mercury.fan.fa.disney.com (mercury.fan.fa.disney.com [153.7.119.1]) by louie.fa.disney.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id LAA28811 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 11:48:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Jim.Pirzyk@disney.com) Received: from [172.30.1.144] by mercury.fan.fa.disney.com with ESMTP for freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org; Sat, 30 Sep 2000 11:48:24 -0700 Message-Id: <39D63577.CF824BA6@disney.com> Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2000 11:48:22 -0700 From: Jim Pirzyk X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74C-CCK-MCD (Macintosh; U; PPC) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: fstat64 Linux call Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org So I am trying to run LSF (from Platform computing, http://www.platform.com) under FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE and I am getting these syslog messages about the LSF programs calling fstat64. Does anyone have a patch for the linux kernel module to implement fstat64? Sep 29 21:07:37 snoopy /kernel: linux: syscall fstat64 is obsoleted or not implemented (pid=323) Thanks - JimP --- @(#) $Id: dot.signature,v 1.9 2000/07/10 16:43:05 pirzyk Exp $ __o Jim.Pirzyk@disney.com ------------------------------------- _'\<,_ Senior Systems Engineer, Walt Disney Feature Animation (*)/ (*) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message