From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 20 4:45:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from server.hmm.za.net (admin.bsdonline.org [196.28.82.142]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B43337BB9A for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 04:45:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david@campsbay.za.net) Received: from DAVID (david [192.168.1.2]) by server.hmm.za.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id OAA54659 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 14:46:19 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from david@campsbay.za.net) Message-ID: <000f01bf7ba0$6a62d8f0$0201a8c0@DAVID> From: "D VAN" To: Subject: strange kernel logs ? Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 14:45:45 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Feb 20 04:59:25 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 152/100 pps Feb 20 04:59:26 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 114/100 pps Feb 20 04:59:27 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 149/100 pps Feb 20 04:59:28 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 131/100 pps Feb 20 04:59:29 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 136/100 pps Anyone know how to fix this and what is causing it ? Also why is this happening only now since ive installed named ? _________________________ David van Rensburg - david@van.web.za aka Van FreeBSD: The Power to Serve __ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 20 4:56:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from luxren2.boostworks.com (luxren2.boostworks.com [194.167.81.214]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8CB37BD00 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 04:56:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from root@boostworks.com) Received: from boostworks.com (root@oldrn.luxdev.boostworks.com [192.168.1.99]) by luxren2.boostworks.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA02476; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 13:55:03 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200002201255.NAA02476@luxren2.boostworks.com> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 13:54:52 +0100 (CET) From: Remy Nonnenmacher Reply-To: remy@boostworks.com Subject: Re: strange kernel logs ? To: david@campsbay.za.net Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <000f01bf7ba0$6a62d8f0$0201a8c0@DAVID> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 20 Feb, D VAN wrote: > Feb 20 04:59:25 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 152/100 pps > Feb 20 04:59:26 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 114/100 pps > Feb 20 04:59:27 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 149/100 pps > Feb 20 04:59:28 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 131/100 pps > Feb 20 04:59:29 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 136/100 pps > > > Anyone know how to fix this and what is causing it ? > Also why is this happening only now since ive installed named ? > More probably a flooding from someone trying to enlist your machine in a futur beer-and-bang party. Check your logs up and down around this to see if you can find a telnet/ssh/ftp/etc... access from the original machine. Also look your http logs for a received 'QUIT' method. Then, politely complain to the domain administrator to calm down the user. RN. ItM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 20 5:49:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.ruhr.de (ns.ruhr.de [141.39.224.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96AC937BCDA for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 05:49:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ue@nathan.ruhr.de) Received: (qmail 5546 invoked by alias); 20 Feb 2000 13:49:41 -0000 Received: (from ue@localhost) by nathan.ruhr.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA02938 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 02:41:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ue) Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 02:41:57 +0100 From: Udo Erdelhoff To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FBSD 4.0 Upgrade Problems Message-ID: <20000220024156.A2392@nathan.ruhr.de> References: <20000219103744.P21720@fw.wintelcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000219103744.P21720@fw.wintelcom.net>; from bright@wintelcom.net on Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 10:37:45AM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Feb 19, 2000 at 10:37:45AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > explain how to do when upgrading from 3.4-STABLE system up to 4.0. > Are there omissions in /usr/src/UPDATING that you would advise updating? Well, the 3.4-stable version of UPDATING (cvs version id 1.14.2.5) is effectivly empty. According to the "COMMON ITEMS" sections of the -current version of UPDATING (cvs version id 1.69) says: To update from 3.x to 4.0 stable -------------------------------- make world And that's not just plain false. On the other hand, everybody who wants to use -current should subscribe to freebsd-current, read the archives of that mailing list and -current's UPDATING. The upgrade from 3.4 to -current has been discussed and there were several postings containing instructions for this upgrade. John Baldwin's message <200002101835.NAA81587@server.baldwin.cx> is a good starting point, the replies to his message contain some other valuable hints. I've managed to upgrade my 3.4-stable system to 4.0-current by following his advice. /s/Udo -- Booze is the answer. I don't remember the question. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 20 7:26:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (csmd2.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De [141.44.22.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D881F37BE4D for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 07:26:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesse@mail.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De) Received: from knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (jesse@knecht [141.44.21.3]) by csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA21658 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 16:26:48 +0100 (MET) Received: (from jesse@localhost) by knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id QAA19962; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 16:25:52 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de: jesse set sender to jesse@cs.uni-magdeburg.de using -f To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Error building freshly cvsuped libcrypt From: Roland Jesse Date: 20 Feb 2000 16:25:52 +0100 Message-ID: <0vn1ov3ngf.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Lines: 33 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I cvsuped -stable sources (from cvsup.apfel.de) and security sources (cvsup.internat.FreeBSD.org) at about 3 pm CET today. Doing a `make buildworld` results in: ------- cut ------- cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/../../../lib/libmd -I/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/../../../lib/libcrypt -DNONEXPORTABLE_CRYPT -DLIBC_SCCS -Wall -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c /usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/../../../lib/libcrypt/crypt.c -o crypt.o /usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/../../../lib/libcrypt/crypt.c: In function `crypt': /usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/../../../lib/libcrypt/crypt.c:62: warning: unused variable `j' /usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/../../../lib/libcrypt/crypt.c: At top level: /usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/../../../lib/libcrypt/crypt.c:14: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used make: don't know how to make crypt-md5.c. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. ------- cut ------- `make` and `make install` in /usr/src/lib/libcrypt works fine but does not help that much as "buildworld" tries to build it again using the above command line. Is the error reasoned in the -DNONEXPORTABLE_CRYPT? I do have a USA_RESIDENT=NO in /etc/make.conf. Roland To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 20 7:35:31 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from postman.lipetsk.ru (postman.lipetsk.ru [195.34.224.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED8537BC20 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 07:35:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ifmail@relay.lipetsk.ru) Received: (from localhost user: 'ifmail', uid#70) by relay.lipetsk.ru id ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 18:35:04 +0300 Received: from f22.n5036.z2.fidonet.org by f1.n5036.z2.fidonet.org with FTN (ifmail v.2.14dev3) id AA39397; Sun, 20 Feb 00 18:35:04 +0300 Apparently-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org To: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" From: Yuri Mashkovtsev Date: Sun, 20 Feb 00 18:22:56 +0300 Subject: Becoming -stable via CTM Message-ID: <20000220182256.A208@biosta.bionet.int> X-FTN-FLAGS: PVT K/S X-FTN-MSGID: 2:5036/22@fidonet aa361636 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.7-RELEASE X-FTN-Tearline: Mutt 1.0pre2i X-FTN-Via: 2:5036/22@fidonet, Sun Feb 20 2000 at 18:22 ifmail (2.14.os-p7) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG hi, what set of deltas do I need to apply in order to transform my 3.4-release box to 3.4-stable ? I've got off-line connection only thus I use CTM :( To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 20 8:47:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (csmd2.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De [141.44.22.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD4837BEC7 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 08:47:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesse@mail.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De) Received: from knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (jesse@knecht [141.44.21.3]) by csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA22139 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 17:47:18 +0100 (MET) Received: (from jesse@localhost) by knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id RAA19999; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 17:46:22 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de: jesse set sender to jesse@cs.uni-magdeburg.de using -f To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: bad magic number in "/usr/lib/libc.so.3" From: Roland Jesse Date: 20 Feb 2000 17:46:22 +0100 Message-ID: <0vhff33jq9.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On a system running the -stable snapshot as of 17. feb, I get the following while trying to install the netscape47-communicator port: ------- cut ------- root.pc2736 ports/www/netscape47-communicator # make install ===> Extracting for netscape-communicator-4.7 >> Checksum OK for communicator-v47-export.x86-unknown-freebsd.tar.gz. ===> netscape-communicator-4.7 depends on shared library: X11.6 - found You can make Netscape use 128-bit encryption by defining USE_128BIT ===> Patching for netscape-communicator-4.7 ===> Configuring for netscape-communicator-4.7 ===> Installing for netscape-communicator-4.7 ===> netscape-communicator-4.7 depends on shared library: X11.6 - found /usr/libexec/ld.so: warning: /usr/lib/libc.so.3: minor version -1 older than expected 0, using it anyway ld.so failed: bad magic number in "/usr/lib/libc.so.3" *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. ------- cut ------- Is that due to a misconfigured system? BTW: The same happens for the -navigator port of the same netscape version. Roland To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 20 9: 3:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (csmd2.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De [141.44.22.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398A537BEB0 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 09:03:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesse@mail.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De) Received: from knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (jesse@knecht [141.44.21.3]) by csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA24612 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 18:03:23 +0100 (MET) Received: (from jesse@localhost) by knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id SAA29502; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 18:02:27 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de: jesse set sender to jesse@cs.uni-magdeburg.de using -f To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Error building freshly cvsuped libcrypt References: <0vn1ov3ngf.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> From: Roland Jesse In-Reply-To: Roland Jesse's message of "20 Feb 2000 16:25:52 +0100" Date: 20 Feb 2000 18:02:27 +0100 Message-ID: <0vbt5b3izg.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I wrote: > cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/../../../lib/libmd -I/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/../../../lib/libcrypt -DNONEXPORTABLE_CRYPT -DLIBC_SCCS -Wall -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c /usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/../../../lib/libcrypt/crypt.c -o crypt.o ... > make: don't know how to make crypt-md5.c. Stop ... > Is the error reasoned in the -DNONEXPORTABLE_CRYPT? I do have a > USA_RESIDENT=NO in /etc/make.conf. Ok, I just took that out but the error message stays the same. No causality there. Roland To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 20 11: 6:33 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from knock.econ.vt.edu (knock.econ.vt.edu [128.173.172.240]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511CD37C035 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 11:06:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rdmurphy@knock.econ.vt.edu) Received: (from rdmurphy@localhost) by knock.econ.vt.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA11078; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 14:06:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rdmurphy) From: "Russell D. Murphy Jr." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 14:06:14 -0500 (EST) To: Roland Jesse Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bad magic number in "/usr/lib/libc.so.3" In-Reply-To: <0vhff33jq9.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> References: <0vhff33jq9.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> X-Mailer: VM 6.43 under 20.4 "Emerald" XEmacs Lucid Message-ID: <14512.14890.940214.418596@knock.econ.vt.edu> Reply-To: rdmurphy@vt.edu Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I suspect mis-configured system; I had no problems on a similar machine: knock [rdmurphy]% uname -a FreeBSD knock.econ.vt.edu 3.4-STABLE FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE #0: Fri Feb 18 15:25:45 EST 2000 rdmurphy@knock.econ.vt.edu:/usr/src/sys/compile/KNOCK i386 with an installation of communicator 4.7 yesterday: knock [rdmurphy]% pkg_info | grep netscape netscape-communicator-4.7.us Netscape Communicator w/US strong 128-bit encryptio knock [rdmurphy]% ls -l `which netscape` lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 Feb 19 11:44 /usr/local/bin/netscape -> communicator-4 Good luck- RDM According to Roland Jesse (February 20, 2000): | On a system running the -stable snapshot as of 17. feb, I get the | following while trying to install the netscape47-communicator port: | | ------- cut ------- | root.pc2736 ports/www/netscape47-communicator # make install | ===> Extracting for netscape-communicator-4.7 | >> Checksum OK for communicator-v47-export.x86-unknown-freebsd.tar.gz. | ===> netscape-communicator-4.7 depends on shared library: X11.6 - found | You can make Netscape use 128-bit encryption by defining USE_128BIT | ===> Patching for netscape-communicator-4.7 | ===> Configuring for netscape-communicator-4.7 | ===> Installing for netscape-communicator-4.7 | ===> netscape-communicator-4.7 depends on shared library: X11.6 - found | /usr/libexec/ld.so: warning: /usr/lib/libc.so.3: minor version -1 older than expected 0, using it anyway | ld.so failed: bad magic number in "/usr/lib/libc.so.3" | *** Error code 1 | | Stop. | *** Error code 1 | | Stop. | *** Error code 1 | | Stop. | ------- cut ------- | | Is that due to a misconfigured system? BTW: The same happens for the | -navigator port of the same netscape version. | | Roland ----- Russell D. Murphy Department of Economics Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University 3034 Pamplin Hall Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0316 (540) 231-4537 rdmurphy@vt.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 20 11:29:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from expnet.net (mail.expnet.net [216.174.90.22]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACB2237B723; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 11:29:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from briang@expnet.net) Received: from briangdesktop [216.174.90.9] by expnet.net with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.00) id A3CD2D70120; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 11:43:09 -0800 Message-ID: <000b01bf7bd8$e9a01c80$095aaed8@expnet.net> Reply-To: "Brian Gallucci" From: "Brian Gallucci" To: Cc: Subject: Trouble with IPFW Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 11:30:15 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I noticed a -1 Refused in our logging, What does this mean ? ipfw: 700 Deny UDP 10.1.1.1:137 216.174.90.90:137 in via fxp0 ipfw: -1 Refuse TCP 195.36.173.44:1107 216.174.90.90:80 in via fxp0 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ipfw: 700 Deny UDP 10.0.0.4:137 216.174.90.90:137 in via fxp0 ipfw: 700 Deny UDP 10.0.0.4:137 216.174.90.90:137 in via fxp0 ipfw: -1 Refuse TCP 194.106.96.6:59409 216.174.90.90:80 in via fxp0 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ipfw: 4400 Deny TCP 24.147.67.6:3566 216.174.90.90:445 in via fxp0 Running FreeBSD 3.4 Thanks -Brian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 20 11:53:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from info.iet.unipi.it (info.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.184]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38ACD37BF19; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 11:52:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from luigi@info.iet.unipi.it) Received: (from luigi@localhost) by info.iet.unipi.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA89589; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 20:52:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from luigi) From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <200002201952.UAA89589@info.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: Trouble with IPFW In-Reply-To: <000b01bf7bd8$e9a01c80$095aaed8@expnet.net> from Brian Gallucci at "Feb 20, 2000 11:30:15 am" To: Brian Gallucci Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 20:52:33 +0100 (CET) Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL61 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] > I noticed a -1 Refused in our logging, What does this mean ? > ipfw: -1 Refuse TCP 195.36.173.44:1107 216.174.90.90:80 in via fxp0 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ i also noticed that some time ago on 3.2 -- apparently comes from fragments, and the values printed could be completely bogus. cheers luigi > ipfw: 700 Deny UDP 10.0.0.4:137 216.174.90.90:137 in via fxp0 > ipfw: 700 Deny UDP 10.0.0.4:137 216.174.90.90:137 in via fxp0 > ipfw: -1 Refuse TCP 194.106.96.6:59409 216.174.90.90:80 in via fxp0 > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > ipfw: 4400 Deny TCP 24.147.67.6:3566 216.174.90.90:445 in via fxp0 > > Running FreeBSD 3.4 > > Thanks > -Brian > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 20 12: 3:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from shell.jeah.net (shell.jeah.net [216.132.235.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2607437BF69; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 12:02:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@shell.jeah.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by shell.jeah.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA21913; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 14:02:00 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from chris) Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 14:02:00 -0600 (CST) From: Chris Byrnes Message-Id: <200002202002.OAA21913@shell.jeah.net> To: questions@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: identd core'ing (pidentd) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ever since I upgraded to 3.4-STABLE, identd has been coring like non-stop.. I tried reinstalling identd and the same thing is happening.. This is prolly not a -STABLE issue, but I'm just curious if anyone else is experiencing this.. Chris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 20 12:40:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from botbay.net (www.botbay.net [151.197.159.116]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227B837BF5F; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 12:40:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wcampbel@botbay.net) Received: from localhost (wcampbel@localhost) by botbay.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA47105; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 15:40:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wcampbel@botbay.net) Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 15:40:07 -0500 (EST) From: Walter Campbell To: Chris Byrnes Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: identd core'ing (pidentd) In-Reply-To: <200002202002.OAA21913@shell.jeah.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I get the same thing on my FreeBSD-STABLE 3.4 IRCD Server, and the bot servers. it happened with 3.3 as well. On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, Chris Byrnes wrote: Ever since I upgraded to 3.4-STABLE, identd has been coring like non-stop.. I tried reinstalling identd and the same thing is happening.. This is prolly not a -STABLE issue, but I'm just curious if anyone else is experiencing this.. Chris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 20 15:15: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (csmd2.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De [141.44.22.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E96F37C00B for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 15:14:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesse@mail.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De) Received: from knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (jesse@knecht [141.44.21.3]) by csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id AAA02304 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 00:14:35 +0100 (MET) Received: (from jesse@localhost) by knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id AAA29960 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 00:13:31 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 00:13:31 +0100 From: Roland Jesse To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Mysterious core dumps for make and cc1 on a recent -stable machine Message-ID: <20000221001331.A29956@knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG When doing a more or less "big" build (like building vtk or buildworld), I am getting core dumps for make, as, and cc1 at nondeterministic points during the compilation. /var/log/messages does not tell much: Feb 20 23:47:57 arthur /kernel: pid 17209 (make), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) That one happened while doing a "make buildworld": ===> gnu/libexec/uucp/uustat /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/libexec/uucp/uustat created for /usr/src/gnu/libexec/uucp/uustat Segmentation fault - core dumped *** Error code 139 Doing another buildworld right ahead goes on for a couple of minutes but dumps core at another point in the source tree. The system is: j.trillian ~ % uname -a FreeBSD trillian.my.local.domain 3.4-STABLE FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE #5: Sat Feb 19 23:48:39 MET 2000 j@trillian:/usr/src/sys/compile/TRILLIAN i386 I cannot really ktrace the whole build as the size of the generated output might eventually exceed my free disk space. Any other hints on how to track this down are appreciated. Roland To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 20 16: 2:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from botbay.net (www.botbay.net [151.197.159.116]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0EAB37BF9B for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 16:02:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wcampbel@botbay.net) Received: from localhost (wcampbel@localhost) by botbay.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA48110; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 19:02:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wcampbel@botbay.net) Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 19:02:33 -0500 (EST) From: Walter Campbell To: Roland Jesse Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Mysterious core dumps for make and cc1 on a recent -stable machine In-Reply-To: <20000221001331.A29956@knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Check your memory and level-2 cache, I had the same problem, all due to faulty L2 Cache On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Roland Jesse wrote: When doing a more or less "big" build (like building vtk or buildworld), I am getting core dumps for make, as, and cc1 at nondeterministic points during the compilation. /var/log/messages does not tell much: Feb 20 23:47:57 arthur /kernel: pid 17209 (make), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) That one happened while doing a "make buildworld": ===> gnu/libexec/uucp/uustat /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/libexec/uucp/uustat created for /usr/src/gnu/libexec/uucp/uustat Segmentation fault - core dumped *** Error code 139 Doing another buildworld right ahead goes on for a couple of minutes but dumps core at another point in the source tree. The system is: j.trillian ~ % uname -a FreeBSD trillian.my.local.domain 3.4-STABLE FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE #5: Sat Feb 19 23:48:39 MET 2000 j@trillian:/usr/src/sys/compile/TRILLIAN i386 I cannot really ktrace the whole build as the size of the generated output might eventually exceed my free disk space. Any other hints on how to track this down are appreciated. Roland To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 20 21:13:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.196.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6A737C0F2 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 21:13:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp) Received: from zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (IDENT:um/P+ICc4Vsm1VHa3+rUT1VOCS5ebmny@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.42.1]) by outmail.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7Wpl2) with ESMTP id OAA24981; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:12:44 +0900 (JST) Received: from zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp [160.12.42.1]) by zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp (8.7.6+2.6Wbeta7/3.4W/zodiac-May96) with ESMTP id OAA07237; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:18:40 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200002210518.OAA07237@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp> To: Roland Jesse Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, yokota@zodiac.mech.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp Subject: Re: Mysterious core dumps for make and cc1 on a recent -stable machine In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 21 Feb 2000 00:13:31 +0100." <20000221001331.A29956@knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de> References: <20000221001331.A29956@knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:18:39 +0900 From: Kazutaka YOKOTA Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >When doing a more or less "big" build (like building vtk or >buildworld), I am getting core dumps for make, as, and cc1 at >nondeterministic points during the compilation. > >/var/log/messages does not tell much: >Feb 20 23:47:57 arthur /kernel: pid 17209 (make), uid 0: exited on signal 11 ( >core dumped) > >That one happened while doing a "make buildworld": [...] I will give you one possible explanation, though I wouldn't claim this is THE cause of your problem. You may have over-heating problem. Even if you are not over-clocking, your CPU may get too hot when the CPU cooler is wearing out. This happened to me a couple of times in the past. In one case, the CPU cooler was completely broken in the end. Check your CPU cooler. Buy a good one. Kazu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 20 21:51: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from beebite.ugh.net.au (beebite.ugh.net.au [203.31.238.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320C337C132 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 21:50:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrew@ugh.net.au) Received: by beebite.ugh.net.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 437B827A; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 16:50:54 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by beebite.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294F8279; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 15:50:54 +1000 (EST) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 15:50:54 +1000 (EST) From: andrew@ugh.net.au To: D VAN Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange kernel logs ? In-Reply-To: <000f01bf7ba0$6a62d8f0$0201a8c0@DAVID> Message-ID: X-WonK: *wibble* MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, D VAN wrote: > Feb 20 04:59:25 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 152/100 pps > Anyone know how to fix this and what is causing it ? You have ICMP bandwith limiting on in your kernel. These messages indicate that your limit of 100 (ICMP response) packets per second would have been exceeded (it wasnt though...I'm pretty sure your box would have sent the first 100 and stopped). Its usually a sign of someone ping flooding you but can be caused by misconfiguration etc. > Also why is this happening only now since ive installed named ? May be a coincidence. Is named working properly? If named isnt listening on an interface that gets a lot of DNS queries your ICMP response packets may be just indications that nothing is listening on that port. Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 20 21:57:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.itga.com.au (ns.itga.com.au [202.53.40.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212DB37C127 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 21:57:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by ns.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA81549 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 16:57:36 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA03592; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 16:57:35 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <200002210557.QAA03592@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 From: Gregory Bond To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: named & log_in_vain Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 16:57:35 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I turned on log_in_vain on a couple of boxes (3.3-R up to 3.4-Stable of a few weeks ago), and I'm getting a lot of log lines like Feb 21 16:24:28 ns /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 192.168.128.49:1617 from 192.168.128.49:53 Feb 21 16:41:03 ns /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 192.168.128.49:1772 from 192.168.128.49:53 This IP address is on one of the ether cards. The first port varies, the second is always 53 (DNS). These machines run local secondary name servers and resolv.conf points to 127.0.0.1 or 192.168.128.49. Can someone explain what's going on, and how I can stop it? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 20 23: 3: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rdc1.tn.home.com (ha1.rdc1.tn.home.com [24.2.7.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E8A37BFE7 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 23:03:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from williamsl@home.com) Received: from RELIABLE ([24.4.115.31]) by mail.rdc1.tn.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with ESMTP id <20000221070304.EKH16584.mail.rdc1.tn.home.com@RELIABLE> for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 23:03:04 -0800 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 02:03:05 -0500 From: Ben Williams X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.39) Personal Organization: Williams Enterprises X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <485.000221@home.com> To: FreeBSD Stable Subject: system rebooting spontaneously X-Sender: Ben Williams Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi all. I have a machine in my charge that has been rebooting itself on almost a daily basis. The only clues I have found so far are entries like this one: Feb 11 15:38:01 beta /kernel: vm_page_free: freeing wired page which appears immediately before some of the reboots but not all of them. I'm not getting signal 11 exits from any software so I don't know if I should suspect faulty memory. The system is: FreeBSD beta.mydomain.net 3.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE #1: Mon Aug 30 05:13:48 GMT 1999 root@beta.mydomain.net:/usr/src/sys/compile/MYDOMAIN-BETA-1 i386 Where should I look to isolate and correct this problem? This server is going to be hosting a specialized email service that is planned to "go live" in just under 60 days so any and all help and suggestions will be appreciated. --Ben Williams mailto:received@email dot com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Feb 20 23:45:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from goliath.siemens.de (goliath.siemens.de [194.138.37.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D7D37C1A1 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2000 23:45:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de) X-Envelope-Sender-Is: andre.albsmeier@mchp.siemens.de (at relayer goliath.siemens.de) Received: from mail2.siemens.de (mail2.siemens.de [139.25.208.11]) by goliath.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA15613 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 08:45:31 +0100 (MET) Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (curry.mchp.siemens.de [139.25.42.7]) by mail2.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA14359 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 08:45:31 +0100 (MET) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA11085 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 08:45:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 08:45:28 +0100 From: Andre Albsmeier To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: New routed: possible netmask problem Message-ID: <20000221084528.A12608@internal> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG There have been various changes to -STABLE's routed four days ago. I am now experiencing a strange message when routed is started: routed: possible netmask problem between fxp0:192.168.1.4/32 and fxp0:192.168.1.0/24 routed: Send mcast sendto(fxp0, 224.0.0.9.520): No route to host If have the following ifconfig lines on the machine in question: ifconfig_fxp0="inet 192.168.1.3 media 100BaseTX mediaopt full-duplex" ifconfig_fxp0_alias0="inet 192.168.1.4 netmask 0xFFFFFFFF" As we can see, 192.168.1.4 is an alias for the machine. ifconfig -a tells me: fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.1.3 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 inet 192.168.1.4 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.1.4 ether 00:a0:c9:ca:18:64 media: 100baseTX status: active supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP I have never had problems with this setup. Is this due to the new routed or has my setup been wrong and nobody told me :-)? Thanks, -Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 2:21:46 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from workhorse.iMach.com (workhorse.iMach.com [206.127.77.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5510337BE28 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 02:21:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from forrestc@workhorse.iMach.com) Received: from localhost (forrestc@localhost) by workhorse.iMach.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id DAA14769; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 03:20:36 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 03:20:35 -0700 (MST) From: "Forrest W. Christian" To: Gregory Bond Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: named & log_in_vain In-Reply-To: <200002210557.QAA03592@lightning.itga.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Gregory Bond wrote: > Feb 21 16:24:28 ns /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 192.168.128.49:1617 from 192.168.128.49:53 > Feb 21 16:41:03 ns /kernel: Connection attempt to UDP 192.168.128.49:1772 from 192.168.128.49:53 > This IP address is on one of the ether cards. The first port varies, the second > is always 53 (DNS). These machines run local secondary name servers and > Can someone explain what's going on, and how I can stop it? This looks suspiciously like responses to named queries and/or named-xfer's. You might want to set named to only use port 53 for outbound queries and see if the log entries change (or go away, since named is listening on 53). - Forrest W. Christian (forrestc@imach.com) KD7EHZ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- iMach, Ltd., P.O. Box 5749, Helena, MT 59604 http://www.imach.com Solutions for your high-tech problems. (406)-442-6648 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 2:33:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gallions-reach.inpharmatica.co.uk (gallions-reach.inpharmatica.co.uk [193.115.214.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28DA437BBD7 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 02:33:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@inpharmatica.co.uk) Received: from mailhost.inpharmatica.co.uk (euston.inpharmatica.co.uk [193.115.214.6]) by gallions-reach.inpharmatica.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA22915 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 10:33:53 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@inpharmatica.co.uk) Received: from paddington.inpharmatica.co.uk (IDENT:root@paddington.inpharmatica.co.uk [192.168.122.1]) by mailhost.inpharmatica.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA13810 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 10:33:52 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@inpharmatica.co.uk) Received: from inpharmatica.co.uk (IDENT:matthew@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by paddington.inpharmatica.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA32046 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 10:33:50 GMT Message-ID: <38B1148E.EA1EDA24@inpharmatica.co.uk> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 10:33:50 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.4 i586) X-Accept-Language: en-GB, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: good network card (xl0 packet dropping) References: <200002190915.BAA52357@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote: > And now that Intel owns what was the Semiconductor Division of DEC, > that includes the DEC dc21x4x based cards :-). In all seriousness > to add roundness to the ``what works well'' either the Intel Pro/100 > cards or our favorite DEC/Intel DC based card the KNE100TX (NOTE do > _not_ get sold the cheaper KNE110TX, it is _not_ a Tulip based card!) Huh? http://www.kingston.com/networking/install/linuxGEN.asp says: 5.Click [Which Module?] (hold down the mouse button) and select a."ne" for KNE20xxLC, KNE20xx+, KNE20x, KNE30x b."tulip" for KNE40x, KNE100TX, KNE110TX c."rtl8139" for KNE120TX We had some KNE120TX's supplied by mistake in a recent batch of machines. Haven't tried them under FreeBSD, but they seem OK for undemanding use under Linux/WinNT. Having said that, I wholeheartedly second Rodney's opinion of the KNE100TX. Matthew -- Certe, Toto, sentio nos in Kansate non iam adesse. Dr. Matthew Seaman, Inpharmatica Ltd, 60 Charlotte St, London, W1P 2AX Tel: +44 171 631 4644 x229 Fax: +44 171 631 4844 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 3:36:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from proxy.outblaze.com (proxy.outblaze.com [202.77.223.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF35A37BBC8 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 03:36:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yusufg@outblaze.com) Received: (qmail 58940 invoked from network); 21 Feb 2000 11:36:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO yusufg.portal2.com) (202.77.223.114) by proxy.outblaze.com with SMTP; 21 Feb 2000 11:36:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 399 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2000 11:36:15 -0000 Date: 21 Feb 2000 11:36:15 -0000 Message-ID: <20000221113615.398.qmail@yusufg.portal2.com> From: Yusuf Goolamabbas To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Understanding ifconfig output Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sorry, typo in address in earlier post. Posting again Here's some sample output from one of my machines (3.4-stable) which has an Intel EEPro 100 attached to a Bay 350 switch fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 ether 00:90:27:8d:49:7b media: autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP My question is , does SIMPLEX mean that the card is in half duplex mode, However the media line seems to indicate that the connection to the swithc is full duplex What is the recommended way to determine link speed from a machine to a hub/switch. (e.g A colo provider claims that there is 100 Mbit card in the box and one would want to verify that) Regards, Yusuf To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 3:47:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E4137BBFC; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 03:47:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id DAA08816; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 03:47:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 03:47:24 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: D VAN Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strange kernel logs ? In-Reply-To: <000f01bf7ba0$6a62d8f0$0201a8c0@DAVID> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, D VAN wrote: > Feb 20 04:59:25 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 152/100 pps > Feb 20 04:59:26 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 114/100 pps > Feb 20 04:59:27 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 149/100 pps > Feb 20 04:59:28 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 131/100 pps > Feb 20 04:59:29 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 136/100 pps > > > Anyone know how to fix this and what is causing it ? Your machine is getting more than 100 ICMP packets per second, which is triggering the rate-limiting in the kernel. > Also why is this happening only now since ive installed named ? Probably it's misconfigured and is generating a storm of "port unreachable" ICMP packets or something. Use tcpdump to figure out what's going on.. Kris ---- "How many roads must a man walk down, before you call him a man?" "Eight!" "That was a rhetorical question!" "Oh..then, seven!" -- Homer Simpson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 3:48:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (csmd2.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De [141.44.22.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AEBD37BC92 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 03:48:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesse@mail.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De) Received: from knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (jesse@knecht [141.44.21.3]) by csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA03113 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:48:26 +0100 (MET) Received: (from jesse@localhost) by knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id MAA10143; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:47:30 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de: jesse set sender to jesse@cs.uni-magdeburg.de using -f To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Error building freshly cvsuped libcrypt References: <0vn1ov3ngf.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> From: Roland Jesse In-Reply-To: Roland Jesse's message of "20 Feb 2000 16:25:52 +0100" Date: 21 Feb 2000 12:47:30 +0100 Message-ID: <0vbt5ard4d.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I wrote: > I cvsuped -stable sources (from cvsup.apfel.de) and security sources > (cvsup.internat.FreeBSD.org) at about 3 pm CET today. ...using tag=. instead of tag=RELEASE_3 in the security supfile. The buildworld just ran through without a hassle. Roland To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 3:49:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA3EB37B784; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 03:49:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id DAA08946; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 03:49:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 03:49:03 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: Ben Williams Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: system rebooting spontaneously In-Reply-To: <485.000221@home.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Ben Williams wrote: > Feb 11 15:38:01 beta /kernel: vm_page_free: freeing wired page > > which appears immediately before some of the reboots but not all of > them. I'm not getting signal 11 exits from any software so I don't > know if I should suspect faulty memory. The system is: > > FreeBSD beta.mydomain.net 3.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 3.1-RELEASE #1: Mon Aug 30 05:13:48 GMT 1999 > root@beta.mydomain.net:/usr/src/sys/compile/MYDOMAIN-BETA-1 i386 There have been a lot of fixes since 3.1-REL, possibly including this VM problem. Consider upgrading to 3.4-RELEASE or 3.4-STABLE. Kris ---- "How many roads must a man walk down, before you call him a man?" "Eight!" "That was a rhetorical question!" "Oh..then, seven!" -- Homer Simpson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 4:17:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sirene.sappho-net.de (sirene.im-netz.de [212.42.225.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05F637BC13 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 04:17:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nora@sappho-net.de) Received: by sappho-net.de (8.9.3/nora-19990802) for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG (envelope-from nora) id NAA24450; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:17:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:17:38 +0100 From: Nora Etukudo To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: port: cyrus-sasl (3.4-stable) Message-ID: <20000221131738.A23459@sirene.sappho-net.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Moin, moin! Just tried to install 'cyrus-sasl' (needed for 'sendmail-8.10') from the ports collection (daily mirrored): 60 [stable:~] =uname -r 3.4-20000213-STABLE 61 [stable:~] =cd ports/security/cyrus-sasl 62 [stable:/archiv/FreeBSD/ports/ports/security/cyrus-sasl] =make install >> cyrus-sasl-1.5.15.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist on this system. >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://ftp.andrew.cmu.edu/pub/cyrus-mail/. Receiving cyrus-sasl-1.5.15.tar.gz (402222 bytes): 100% 402222 bytes transferred in 27.6 seconds (14.23 Kbytes/s) ===> Extracting for cyrus-sasl-1.5.15 [....] ===> Building for libtool-1.3.3 [....] ===> Installing for libtool-1.3.3 [....] ===> Registering installation for libtool-1.3.3 ===> Returning to build of cyrus-sasl-1.5.15 ===> cyrus-sasl-1.5.15 depends on shared library: crypto.1 - found ===> Patching for cyrus-sasl-1.5.15 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for cyrus-sasl-1.5.15 Couldn't open /usr/libexec/ld.so. ===> Configuring for cyrus-sasl-1.5.15 [....] checking for BSD-compatible nm... /usr/bin/nm -B checking whether ln -s works... yes updating cache ./config.cache /ltconfig: Can't open /ltconfig configure: error: libtool configure failed ===> Script "configure" failed: here are the contents of "config.log" This file contains any messages produced by compilers while running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake. configure:605: checking host system type configure:638: checking for a BSD compatible install configure:691: checking whether build environment is sane configure:748: checking whether make sets ${MAKE} configure:794: checking for working aclocal configure:807: checking for working autoconf configure:820: checking for working automake configure:833: checking for working autoheader configure:846: checking for working makeinfo configure:896: checking for gcc configure:1009: checking whether the C compiler (cc -O -pipe ) works configure:1025: cc -o conftest -O -pipe conftest.c 1>&5 configure:1051: checking whether the C compiler (cc -O -pipe ) is a cross-compiler configure:1056: checking whether we are using GNU C configure:1065: cc -E conftest.c configure:1084: checking whether cc accepts -g configure:1116: checking how to run the C preprocessor configure:1137: cc -E conftest.c >/dev/null 2>conftest.out configure:1207: checking for a BSD compatible install configure:1263: checking for runpath switch configure:1279: cc -o conftest -O -pipe -R /usr/lib conftest.c 1>&5 configure:1522: checking build system type configure:1542: checking for ranlib configure:1581: checking for ld used by GCC configure:1643: checking if the linker (/usr/libexec/elf/ld) is GNU ld GNU ld version 2.9.1 (with BFD 2.9.1) configure:1659: checking for BSD-compatible nm configure:1695: checking whether ln -s works (end of "config.log") *** Error code 1 Stop. What did I'm makeing odd? Liebe Grüße, Nora. -- nora@sappho-net.de http://www.sappho-net.de/ Lesbian Computer Networks, Finland http://www.sappho.net/ Web for Women (von Frauen, für Frauen) http://www.w4w.net/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 4:26:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ZGIA.zp.ua (ZGIA.zp.ua [212.35.173.98]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50DB837BA8C for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 04:26:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from laa@zgia.zp.ua) Received: from localhost (laa@localhost) by ZGIA.zp.ua (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA52665 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:21:31 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from laa@zgia.zp.ua) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:21:31 +0200 (EET) From: Alexandr Listopad To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): Deferred Error... Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I have FreeBSD-3.4-STABLE ...and my HD is: da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 8, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 4340MB (8888924 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 4340C) da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da1: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 8, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 4340MB (8888924 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 4340C) yesturday I have this message in the kernel logs: Feb 20 03:36:04 Eagle /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): WRITE(10). CDB: 2a 0 0 49 a0 df 0 0 10 0 Feb 20 03:36:04 Eagle /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): Deferred Error: Vendor Specific info:49a103 asc:80,0 Feb 20 03:36:04 Eagle /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): Vendor Specific ASC field repla ceable unit: 1e What does it can mean? Thanks. Regards, Listopad Alexandr (laa@zgia.zp.ua), LAA7-RIPE ZGIA, Zaporozhye, Ukraine. http://www.zgia.zp.ua. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 5: 5:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from afcon.net (afcon.afcon.net [209.26.60.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D25737BC6D for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 05:05:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scorpio@sunline.net) Received: from Scorpio.home.lan (afcon-dyn161.afcon.net [209.26.171.40]) by afcon.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA26038; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 07:50:19 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 07:51:20 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Palmer X-Sender: scorpio@Scorpio.home.lan To: Remy Nonnenmacher Cc: david@campsbay.za.net, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: strange kernel logs ? In-Reply-To: <200002201255.NAA02476@luxren2.boostworks.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG There are a few options in the kernel you can add: options ICMP_BANDLIM #Rate limit bad replies I don't know how to change the bandwidth limit, however.. I did notice that as soon as I nmapped my own machine (nmap localhost) I recieved a bunch of these exact messages in my logs. Jeff Palmer scorpio@sunline.net No Unix Guru, just averade hobbiest. On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, Remy Nonnenmacher wrote: > On 20 Feb, D VAN wrote: > > Feb 20 04:59:25 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 152/100 pps > > Feb 20 04:59:26 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 114/100 pps > > Feb 20 04:59:27 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 149/100 pps > > Feb 20 04:59:28 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 131/100 pps > > Feb 20 04:59:29 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 136/100 pps > > > > > > Anyone know how to fix this and what is causing it ? > > Also why is this happening only now since ive installed named ? > > > > More probably a flooding from someone trying to enlist your machine in > a futur beer-and-bang party. Check your logs up and down around this to > see if you can find a telnet/ssh/ftp/etc... access from the original > machine. Also look your http logs for a received 'QUIT' method. Then, > politely complain to the domain administrator to calm down the user. > > RN. > ItM > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 5:13:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (csmd2.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De [141.44.22.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF9BC37BC6D for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 05:13:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesse@mail.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De) Received: from knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (jesse@knecht [141.44.21.3]) by csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA04236 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:13:16 +0100 (MET) Received: (from jesse@localhost) by knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id OAA10256; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:12:15 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de: jesse set sender to jesse@cs.uni-magdeburg.de using -f To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: installworld: References: <0vn1ov3ngf.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> <0vbt5ard4d.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> From: Roland Jesse In-Reply-To: Roland Jesse's message of "21 Feb 2000 12:47:30 +0100" Date: 21 Feb 2000 14:12:15 +0100 Message-ID: <0v66vir974.fsf_-_@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I wrote: > The buildworld just ran through without a hassle. Just FYI: The installworld did not. Right at the end: -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Rebuilding man page indices -------------------------------------------------------------- cd /usr/src/share/man; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make makedb makewhatis /usr/share/man gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 5:57: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (csmd2.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De [141.44.22.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BA937BD50 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 05:57:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesse@mail.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De) Received: from knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (jesse@knecht [141.44.21.3]) by csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA04751; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:56:59 +0100 (MET) Received: (from jesse@localhost) by knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id OAA10316; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:55:43 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:55:43 +0100 From: Roland Jesse To: "Sean O'Connell" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bad magic number in "/usr/lib/libc.so.3" Message-ID: <20000221145543.A10265@knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de> References: <0vhff33jq9.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> <20000220232439.A21303@stat.Duke.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i In-Reply-To: <20000220232439.A21303@stat.Duke.EDU> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sean O'Connell wrote: > It looks like you don't have the a.out libs for X11 installed (the > FreeBSD native netscape is _still_ a.out :( ). They should be in > /usr/X11R6/lib/aout . They are. I specifically built the x11/XFree port and answered the aout question with YES. > If they are there, then you have not run the > necessary ldconfig -aout commands at bootup (they should be in the > last 15 or so lines of /etc/default/rc.conf). ldconfig_paths_aout="/usr/lib/compat/aout /usr/X11R6/lib/aout /usr/local/lib/aout" The error message says `bad magic number in "/usr/lib/libc.so.3"'. That's what makes me wonder. Roland To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 6:13:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E821737BC1D; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 06:13:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 21 Feb 2000 14:12:57 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:12:56 +0000 From: David Malone To: Walter Campbell Cc: Chris Byrnes , questions@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: identd core'ing (pidentd) Message-ID: <20000221141256.A41266@walton.maths.tcd.ie> References: <200002202002.OAA21913@shell.jeah.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from wcampbel@botbay.net on Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 03:40:07PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 03:40:07PM -0500, Walter Campbell wrote: > I get the same thing on my FreeBSD-STABLE 3.4 IRCD Server, and the bot > servers. it happened with 3.3 as well. Same thing here - recompiling made no difference. If inetd's builtin identd was fixed to work with multiple packets then that could be used instead I guess. (http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=16086) David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 6:48:28 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57B737BC48 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 06:48:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id GAA00608; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 06:47:45 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda00606; Mon Feb 21 06:47:42 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.3/8.9.1) id GAA58094; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 06:47:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from cwsys9.cwsent.com(10.2.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpda58090; Mon Feb 21 06:46:46 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id GAA53733; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 06:46:46 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200002211446.GAA53733@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdK53714; Mon Feb 21 06:45:48 2000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE X-Sender: cy To: "O. Hartmann" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FBSD 4.0 Upgrade Problems In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 19 Feb 2000 13:17:11 +0100." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 06:45:48 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , "O. Hartmann" writes: > Now I did all things recommended for upgrading ... on my "old 3.4" > system, I catched all the new sources via cvs. Then I compiled and installed > config and genassym manually ... rewrtote the kernel configuration definition > s, > compiled a kernel and after some problems I got a new kernel ... but not the > suitable devices in /dev/ (missing /dev/drum etc.). Well, thought this is goi > ng > away by make world ... but - shit! Compiler breaks due the lack of a special > option. I guess it's a new egcs option but the compiler I use is still the > one from the original 3.4-STABLE distribution (cvsupded last night before > upgading). Can anybody help? I think it would be nice if anyone of the GURUS > out of the core team post a file called UPGRADE-STEPS or similar in which the > y > explain rudimentary how to do when upgrading from 3.4-STABLE system up to 4.0 > . Actually, my compiles failed because 4.0's shell and other utilities use 4.0's new system calls. The advice I was given was (thanks Ruslan Ermilov): 0. `uname -r' returns 3.x 1. make buildworld 2. make buildkernel 3. make installkernel 4. reboot with new kernel in signle-user mode 5. make -DNOINFO installworld 6. make buildkernel installkernel (again) 7. make installworld (again, without -DNOINFO) Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/DEC Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca UNIX Group, ITSD, ISTA Province of BC "COBOL IS A WASTE OF CARDS." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 7:25:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0539237BE2C for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 07:25:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id HAA00701; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 07:25:46 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda00699; Mon Feb 21 07:25:43 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.9.3/8.9.1) id HAA58258; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 07:25:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from cwsys9.cwsent.com(10.2.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdS58251; Mon Feb 21 07:24:47 2000 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id HAA53892; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 07:24:46 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200002211524.HAA53892@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdE53888; Mon Feb 21 07:24:12 2000 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group X-OS: FreeBSD 3.4-RELEASE X-Sender: cy To: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Cc: Tom , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Initial performance testing w/ postmark & softupdates... In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 19 Feb 2000 03:53:42 CST." <3.0.3.32.20000219035342.009ce460@207.227.119.2> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 07:24:12 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <3.0.3.32.20000219035342.009ce460@207.227.119.2>, "Jeffrey J. Mounti n" writes: > At 03:08 PM 2/18/00 -0800, Tom wrote: > >On Fri, 18 Feb 2000, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > > > >> Tom wrote: > >> > > >> > Not really. You could just use async updates instead of softupdates. > >> > Or an OS that uses async updates. Write caching metadata is always > faster > >> > than re-ordering it intelligently. > >> > >> Softupdates reduces the number of writes needed. It can coalesce writes > >> to the same block. > > > > Async updates are always as fast as softupdates, if not faster. You > >should read the softupdates docs. > > As fast, but not safer. > > Can't recall the entire analogy, but Terry mentioned on -hacker a long time > back something to the effect that softupdates is like having a seatbelt and > an airbag rather than just a seatbelt, as well as a faster car too. A paper by Gregory R. Granger and Yale N. Patt of the Departement of EECS, University of Michigan entitled Soft Update: A Solution to the Metadata Update Problem in File Systems discusses softupdate performance v.s. asynchronous write performance. The difference wasn't much, somewhere around 2-3%. Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/DEC Team Internet: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca UNIX Group, ITSD, ISTA Province of BC "COBOL IS A WASTE OF CARDS." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 7:27: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mecca.servint.com (mecca.servint.com [209.50.225.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C663D37BE74 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 07:27:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from loschert@servint.com) Received: from delft.servint.com (207-172-244-68.s68.tnt4.rcm.va.dialup.rcn.com [207.172.244.68]) by mecca.servint.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id KAA09564 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 10:38:54 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 36470 invoked by uid 1000); 21 Feb 2000 15:26:19 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Feb 2000 15:26:19 -0000 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 10:26:19 -0500 (EST) From: Matt Loschert To: Roland Jesse Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Error building freshly cvsuped libcrypt In-Reply-To: <0vbt5ard4d.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 21 Feb 2000, Roland Jesse wrote: > > I cvsuped -stable sources (from cvsup.apfel.de) and security sources > > (cvsup.internat.FreeBSD.org) at about 3 pm CET today. > > ...using tag=. instead of tag=RELEASE_3 in the security supfile. Unless I am mistaken, if you are building a -STABLE system with crypto sources, you want either of the following in your supfile: *default tag=RELENG_3 src-all cvs-crypto OR: src-all tag=RELENG_3 cvs-crypto tag=RELENG_3 If you specify tag=. for your crypto sources, you will be getting the -CURRENT crypto which may or may not compile for you, but most of the time will not. -- Matt Loschert Software Engineer ServInt Internet Services To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 7:35:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from palrel3.hp.com (palrel3.hp.com [156.153.255.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F50E37BD62 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 07:35:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steve@sse0691.bri.hp.com) Received: from sse0691.bri.hp.com (sse0691.bri.hp.com [15.144.0.53]) by palrel3.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30336319 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 07:35:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (steve@localhost) by sse0691.bri.hp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA54033; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 15:31:38 GMT (envelope-from steve@sse0691.bri.hp.com) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 15:31:38 +0000 (GMT) From: Stephen Roome To: "Jason J. Horton" Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: problems booting kernel from large drive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Jason J. Horton wrote: > I have a -STABLE system with a 27gig IBM EIDE, and when I set up the > system, I only made 2 partitions, / and swapspace. The system has been > working just fine, till I did a "make world" and installed a new kernel. I got a whole pile of problems with my 34Gb IDM drive, in the end I needed a new BIOS to get it to work properly, or had to fake the geometry in the BIOS because the drive has >65k cyls. I never figured out what the LBA errors are, but they've gone away since I played with the BIOS and told it was in fact a 4160/255/63 drive in CHS mode. (The disk says I should tell the BIOS it's 16383/16/63, but that didn't work at all =( ) I had to set it up like so to get it to work : wdc0: unit 0 (wd0): , LBA, DMA, 32-bit, multi-block-16 wd0: 32634MB (66835440 sectors), 4160 cyls, 255 heads, 63 S/T, 512 B/S If you have a solution that works well it would be interesting to know how you've done it and what Motherboard/BIOS you've got. Steve P.S. your problems may be entirely unrelated of course and have a far easier solution, this is just my £0.02 worth To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 8:10:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (csmd2.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De [141.44.22.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4FB37B69F for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 08:10:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesse@mail.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De) Received: from knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (jesse@knecht [141.44.21.3]) by csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA08482 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:10:16 +0100 (MET) Received: (from jesse@localhost) by knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id RAA10776; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:09:19 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de: jesse set sender to jesse@cs.uni-magdeburg.de using -f To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: ports/devel/libtool fails for 3.4-STABLE From: Roland Jesse Date: 21 Feb 2000 17:09:19 +0100 Message-ID: <0vwvnypmfk.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Lines: 29 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On a 3.4-STABLE system as of today: root.pc2736 ports/devel/libtool # make ===> Extracting for libtool-1.3.3 >> Checksum OK for libtool-1.3.3.tar.gz. ===> Patching for libtool-1.3.3 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for libtool-1.3.3 ===> Configuring for libtool-1.3.3 configure: warning: i386--freebsd3.4-STABLE: invalid host type . . . checking for ranlib... (cached) ranlib checking for ld used by GCC... (cached) /usr/libexec/elf/ld checking if the linker (/usr/libexec/elf/ld) is GNU ld... (cached) yes checking for BSD-compatible nm... (cached) /usr/bin/nm -B checking whether ln -s works... (cached) yes updating cache .././config.cache loading cache .././config.cache within ltconfig ltconfig: you must specify a host type if you use `--no-verify' Try `ltconfig --help' for more information. configure: error: libtool configure failed configure: error: ./configure failed for libltdl It is a bit annoying as quite a few ports depend on libtool. Any hints on what I might have messed up are appreciated. Roland To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 11:16:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from frolkin.demon.co.uk (frolkin.demon.co.uk [194.222.100.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FCA37B618 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 11:16:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sasha@frolkin.demon.co.uk) Received: from sasha by frolkin.demon.co.uk with local (Exim 3.12 #1) id 12MyIi-0000Wd-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 19:15:20 +0000 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 19:15:20 +0000 From: Alexander Frolkin To: Jeff Palmer Cc: remy@boostworks.com, david@campsbay.za.net, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: strange kernel logs ? Message-ID: <20000221191520.A1493@gamma> Reply-To: Alexander Frolkin References: <200002201255.NAA02476@luxren2.boostworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.5i In-Reply-To: ; from Jeff Palmer on Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 07:51:20AM -0500 X-Operating-System: Linux 2.2.14 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > There are a few options in the kernel you can add: > options ICMP_BANDLIM #Rate limit bad replies > > I don't know how to change the bandwidth limit, however.. There's a sysctl parameter for that. I can't remember what it is, but you can use sysctl -a | grep icmp to find it. Alexander. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 11:53:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.telekabel.nl (arnhem.telekabel.nl [194.134.132.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F345037B52B for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 11:53:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ernst@jollem.com) Received: from jollem.com (c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl [212.187.104.187]) by mail.telekabel.nl (8.8.8/8.8/EuroNet) with ESMTP id UAA16336; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 20:53:11 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <38B197A7.79930A37@jollem.com> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 20:53:11 +0100 From: Ernst de Haan Organization: Jollem X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en, nl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Kernel panic on `ls -la' on Mac-formatted /dev/fd0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------438E863D3041317F62AE8D2B" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------438E863D3041317F62AE8D2B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, This is probably a bug. When I mount a Mac-formatted 1.44 MB disk, and I do an `ls -la', my computer resets spontanously. The console shows a kernel panic: page not found, then it says: syncinc disks 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 (and a few more) and then reboots. An `ls -l' runs just fine. My system is FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE on a P2-400, 128 MB. Ernst -- Ernst de Haan Freelance Java Architect "Come to me all who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ --------------438E863D3041317F62AE8D2B Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="ernst.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Ernst de Haan Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ernst.vcf" begin:vcard n:de Haan;Ernst tel;fax:+31 (0)26 3645634 tel;work:+31 (0)26 3623895 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.znerd.demon.nl/ org:Jollem adr:;;Rozendaalselaan 35;Velp;GLD;6881 KZ;Netherlands version:2.1 email;internet:ernst@jollem.com title:Java Architect fn:Ernst de Haan end:vcard --------------438E863D3041317F62AE8D2B-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 12:21: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.desktop.com (mail.desktop.com [166.90.128.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8A837B552 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:21:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from clark@desktop.com) Received: (from clark@localhost) by mail.desktop.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id MAA48981; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:20:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from clark) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:20:50 -0800 From: Clark Shishido To: Ernst de Haan Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel panic on `ls -la' on Mac-formatted /dev/fd0 Message-ID: <20000221122050.A48074@desktop.com> References: <38B197A7.79930A37@jollem.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: <38B197A7.79930A37@jollem.com>; from Ernst de Haan on Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 08:53:11PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 08:53:11PM +0100, Ernst de Haan emailed: > This is probably a bug. > > When I mount a Mac-formatted 1.44 MB disk, and I do an `ls -la', my > computer resets spontanously. The console shows a kernel panic: page not > found, then it says: syncinc disks 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 (and a few more) > and then reboots. which mount command are you using to mount the floppy? This might be related to the "formatting a locked floppy" problem which locks up any FreeBSD 3 machine quite easily. There was a thread on this here in freebsd-stable a few weeks ago. me, I just keep all my floppies DOS, since my Macs can read them anyway. --clark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 12:22:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from alcanet.com.au (mail.alcanet.com.au [203.62.196.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2445C37BF5A; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:22:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au) Received: by border.alcanet.com.au id <115205>; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 07:23:22 +1100 Content-return: prohibited From: Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: Understanding ifconfig output In-reply-to: <20000221113615.398.qmail@yusufg.portal2.com>; from yusufg@outblaze.com on Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 10:38:13PM +1100 To: Yusuf Goolamabbas Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Message-Id: <00Feb22.072322est.115205@border.alcanet.com.au> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii References: <20000221113615.398.qmail@yusufg.portal2.com> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 07:23:21 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 2000-Feb-21 22:38:13 +1100, Yusuf Goolamabbas wrote: >does SIMPLEX mean that the card is in half duplex mode, No. From /usr/include/net/if.h: #define IFF_SIMPLEX 0x800 /* can't hear own transmissions */ >What is the recommended way to determine link speed from a machine to >a hub/switch. With FreeBSD, the `media' line of ifconfig output: >media: autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active > (e.g A colo provider claims that there is 100 Mbit card >in the box and one would want to verify that) Configure the other end to 100baseTX only and verify the link comes up. Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 12:27:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.telekabel.nl (arnhem.telekabel.nl [194.134.132.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB5837B5B0 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:27:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ernst@jollem.com) Received: from jollem.com (c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl [212.187.104.187]) by mail.telekabel.nl (8.8.8/8.8/EuroNet) with ESMTP id VAA24291; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 21:27:01 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <38B19F96.1171B089@jollem.com> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 21:27:02 +0100 From: Ernst de Haan Organization: Jollem X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en, nl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Clark Shishido Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel panic on `ls -la' on Mac-formatted /dev/fd0 References: <38B197A7.79930A37@jollem.com> <20000221122050.A48074@desktop.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------ACFFD8E28281F83C9BC12C31" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------ACFFD8E28281F83C9BC12C31 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The disk is DOS-formatted by a Mac, I believe. I just issue: mount /mnt/floppy and my /etc/fstab specifies that /mnt/floppy is /dev/fd0, type msdos Ernst Clark Shishido wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 08:53:11PM +0100, Ernst de Haan emailed: > > This is probably a bug. > > > > When I mount a Mac-formatted 1.44 MB disk, and I do an `ls -la', my > > computer resets spontanously. The console shows a kernel panic: page not > > found, then it says: syncinc disks 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 (and a few more) > > and then reboots. > > which mount command are you using to mount the floppy? > > This might be related to the "formatting a locked floppy" problem which locks up any FreeBSD 3 machine quite easily. There was a thread on this here in freebsd-stable a few weeks ago. > > me, I just keep all my floppies DOS, since my Macs can read them anyway. > > --clark -- Ernst de Haan Freelance Java Architect "Come to me all who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ --------------ACFFD8E28281F83C9BC12C31 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="ernst.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Ernst de Haan Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ernst.vcf" begin:vcard n:de Haan;Ernst tel;fax:+31 (0)26 3645634 tel;work:+31 (0)26 3623895 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.znerd.demon.nl/ org:Jollem adr:;;Rozendaalselaan 35;Velp;GLD;6881 KZ;Netherlands version:2.1 email;internet:ernst@jollem.com title:Java Architect fn:Ernst de Haan end:vcard --------------ACFFD8E28281F83C9BC12C31-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 12:53:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.desktop.com (mail.desktop.com [166.90.128.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5094637B5A2 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:53:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from clark@desktop.com) Received: from [192.168.1.42] (jumpgate.desktop.com [166.90.128.243]) by ns.desktop.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id MAA49484; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:52:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from clark@desktop.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: clark@mail.desktop.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <38B19F96.1171B089@jollem.com> References: <38B197A7.79930A37@jollem.com> <20000221122050.A48074@desktop.com> <38B19F96.1171B089@jollem.com> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 12:52:25 -0800 To: Ernst de Haan From: Clark Shishido Subject: Re: Kernel panic on `ls -la' on Mac-formatted /dev/fd0 Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 21:27 +0100 2000.02.21, Ernst de Haan wrote: >The disk is DOS-formatted by a Mac, I believe. I just issue: > > mount /mnt/floppy > >and my /etc/fstab specifies that /mnt/floppy is /dev/fd0, type msdos > if it's really a Mac floppy with a HFS partition, you'll want to use hfsutils to mount the floppy, check /usr/ports/emulators/hfsutils. I haven't used them in a while so I can't quote the command for you. If you're sure it's a dos formatted floppy, make sure it's not write-protected. One other trick is to delete the FINDER.DAT file which the Mac uses to cache file mappings from DOS dot-3 (.txt, .doc, .htm, etc) filetypes to Macintosh style type and creator codes (TEXT/R*ch, WDBN/MSWD, TEXT/MOSS, ...). --clark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 13:14:53 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE08837B750; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:14:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id NAA22272; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:14:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:14:51 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: Roland Jesse Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/devel/libtool fails for 3.4-STABLE In-Reply-To: <0vwvnypmfk.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 21 Feb 2000, Roland Jesse wrote: > Any hints on what I might have messed up are appreciated. Do you have an older version already installed? It might be confusing the build. Kris ---- "How many roads must a man walk down, before you call him a man?" "Eight!" "That was a rhetorical question!" "Oh..then, seven!" -- Homer Simpson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 13:31: 4 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from polio.ecst.csuchico.edu (polio.ecst.csuchico.edu [132.241.4.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3AB9737B585 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:31:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from amarks@ecst.csuchico.edu) Received: (qmail 28859 invoked by uid 20393); 21 Feb 2000 13:30:57 -0800 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:30:57 -0800 (PST) From: "Adam D. Marks" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: inetd? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I was curious if it is posible to have different inetd configurations for different network interfaces. If this is possible in any FreeBSD I would appreciate any info. Thank you, Adam To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 14: 3:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A483F37B606 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:03:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA15135; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:03:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <38B1B5D2.1478C9D2@gorean.org> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:01:54 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Adam D. Marks" Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: inetd? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Adam D. Marks" wrote: > > I was curious if it is posible to have different inetd configurations for > different network interfaces. No, it's not. You could accomplish the same thing by enabling all of the services you want in inetd.conf and then restricting access to those ports with a firewall like ipfw or ipfilter. Depending on exactly what you want to do, you might be able to do the same thing with just hosts.allow. Good luck, Doug -- "Welcome to the desert of the real." - Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 14:20:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from kci.kciLink.com (kci.kciLink.com [204.117.82.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B2737B8DA for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:20:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from khera@kciLink.com) Received: from onceler.kcilink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [204.117.82.2]) by kci.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AAEE8A8; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:20:49 -0500 (EST) Received: (from khera@localhost) by onceler.kcilink.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA22889; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:20:49 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from khera@kci.kcilink.com) From: Vivek Khera MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14513.47681.137038.821262@onceler.kcilink.com> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:20:49 -0500 (EST) To: Doug Barton Cc: "Adam D. Marks" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: inetd? In-Reply-To: <38B1B5D2.1478C9D2@gorean.org> References: <38B1B5D2.1478C9D2@gorean.org> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under 21.1 (patch 8) "Bryce Canyon" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>>>> "DB" == Doug Barton writes: DB> "Adam D. Marks" wrote: >> >> I was curious if it is posible to have different inetd configurations for >> different network interfaces. DB> No, it's not. You could accomplish the same thing by enabling all of the DB> services you want in inetd.conf and then restricting access to those ports Then what's the -a parameter to inetd for? Why not just run two different inetd's bound to different IP addresses, one for each interface? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 14:35:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FAF37B60A for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:35:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA15288; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:35:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <38B1BD43.A09E29E9@gorean.org> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:33:39 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vivek Khera Cc: "Adam D. Marks" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: inetd? References: <38B1B5D2.1478C9D2@gorean.org> <14513.47681.137038.821262@onceler.kcilink.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Vivek Khera wrote: > > >>>>> "DB" == Doug Barton writes: > > DB> "Adam D. Marks" wrote: > >> > >> I was curious if it is posible to have different inetd configurations for > >> different network interfaces. > > DB> No, it's not. You could accomplish the same thing by enabling all of the > DB> services you want in inetd.conf and then restricting access to those ports > > Then what's the -a parameter to inetd for? Why not just run two > different inetd's bound to different IP addresses, one for each > interface? Well, that sounds like a good suggestion. I had assumed that the original poster had taken the time to look at the man page. Thanks for the tip, Doug -- "Welcome to the desert of the real." - Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 14:42: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailf.telia.com (mailf.telia.com [194.22.194.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E754337B90E for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:41:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lennart.ljungqvist@telia.com) Received: from d1o10.telia.com (d1o10.telia.com [195.67.157.241]) by mailf.telia.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA06209 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 23:41:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from lelle (t3o10p48.telia.com [195.67.157.168]) by d1o10.telia.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA09839 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 23:41:47 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <005201bf7cbc$f14fd4e0$0101a8c0@lelle> From: "Ljungqvist, Lennart" To: Subject: Signal 11 error when installing 3.4 STABLE Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 23:42:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004F_01BF7CC5.522940A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004F_01BF7CC5.522940A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello FreeBSD users! When I try to install FreeBSD 3.4 STABLE I run into some serious = problems. I boot the computer with the installation CD, make the proper = hardware configuration, make the FreeBSD slice and necessary labels... = but when I try to make a custom installation the system immediately = hangs with a message "Caught a signal 11, I'm trying to save everything = and shutting down... etc etc", and the installation fails.=20 The thing is, I can install FreeBSD by using one of the installation = packages, and that seems to work just fine, but when I run = /stand/sysinstall and try to add some of the distributions I get the = same "signal 11 error". These problems does not appear when installing the previous version, = FreeBSD 3.3 STABLE. What is this signal 11 error, and why is it turning my = installation/uppgrading into nothing??? Thank you for your comments on this! Lennart ------=_NextPart_000_004F_01BF7CC5.522940A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello FreeBSD users!
 
When I try to install FreeBSD 3.4 = STABLE I run into=20 some serious problems. I boot the computer with the installation CD, = make the=20 proper hardware configuration, make the FreeBSD slice and necessary = labels...=20 but when I try to make a custom installation the system immediately = hangs with a=20 message "Caught a signal 11, I'm trying to save everything and = shutting=20 down... etc etc", and the installation fails.
 
The thing is, I can install FreeBSD by = using one of=20 the installation packages, and that seems to work just fine, but when I = run=20 /stand/sysinstall and try to add some of the distributions I get the = same=20 "signal 11 error".
 
These problems does not appear when = installing the=20 previous version, FreeBSD 3.3 STABLE.
 
What is this signal 11 error, = and why is it=20 turning my installation/uppgrading into nothing???
 
Thank you for your comments on this!
Lennart
------=_NextPart_000_004F_01BF7CC5.522940A0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 15: 3: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from nipplehead.yi.org (nat196.192.mpoweredpc.net [142.177.196.192]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25DAE37B585 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 15:02:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bbursey@nipplehead.yi.org) Received: from localhost (bbursey@localhost) by nipplehead.yi.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA12804; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 19:02:09 -0400 (AST) (envelope-from bbursey@nipplehead.yi.org) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 19:02:09 -0400 (AST) From: Bryan Bursey To: "Ljungqvist, Lennart" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Signal 11 error when installing 3.4 STABLE In-Reply-To: <005201bf7cbc$f14fd4e0$0101a8c0@lelle> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG You should have read the ERRATA.TXT file on ftp.freebsd.org... See below. ---- System Update Information: o As shipped, the "Custom" installation option in 3.4 is broken and menu items like Configure don't work. Fix: Both the "Novice" and "Express" install paths still work and can be used just as effectively (if not succinctly). Alternately, you can invoke the custom installation from the "Index" menu (Installation, Custom) along with the Configuration option. You can also download a fixed mfsroot.flp floppy image (or boot.flp if you need 2.88MB boot media) from the following URL: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/3.4-RELEASE/floppies/updates/ The 3.4 ISO installation image is also updated to contain fixes for all these errata items. On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Ljungqvist, Lennart wrote: > Hello FreeBSD users! > > When I try to install FreeBSD 3.4 STABLE I run into some serious problems. I boot the computer with the installation CD, make the proper hardware configuration, make the FreeBSD slice and necessary labels... but when I try to make a custom installation the system immediately hangs with a message "Caught a signal 11, I'm trying to save everything and shutting down... etc etc", and the installation fails. > > The thing is, I can install FreeBSD by using one of the installation packages, and that seems to work just fine, but when I run /stand/sysinstall and try to add some of the distributions I get the same "signal 11 error". > > These problems does not appear when installing the previous version, FreeBSD 3.3 STABLE. > > What is this signal 11 error, and why is it turning my installation/uppgrading into nothing??? > > Thank you for your comments on this! > Lennart > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 17: 0:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peak.mountin.net (peak.mountin.net [207.227.119.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8483A37B58F for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:00:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jeff-ml@mountin.net) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by peak.mountin.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id SAA03989; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:56:04 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jeff-ml@mountin.net) Received: from dial-65.max1.wa.cyberlynk.net(207.227.118.65) by peak.mountin.net via smap (V1.3) id sma003987; Mon Feb 21 18:55:37 2000 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.20000221185515.00a2f880@207.227.119.2> X-Sender: jeff-ml@207.227.119.2 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:55:15 -0600 To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: Re: Initial performance testing w/ postmark & softupdates... Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200002211524.HAA53892@cwsys.cwsent.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 07:24 AM 2/21/00 -0800, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote: >A paper by Gregory R. Granger and Yale N. Patt of the Departement of >EECS, University of Michigan entitled Soft Update: A Solution to the >Metadata Update Problem in File Systems discusses softupdate >performance v.s. asynchronous write performance. The difference wasn't >much, somewhere around 2-3%. Only recently enabled softupdates. Used an asynch /usr/obj (striped vinum volume) for building and noatime on several mounts. Vividly recall the problems way back when with softupdates and never got around to testing it. It has been mature for a while, so the change was overdue. My /usr/obj are^H^H^Hwere a couple old 540 Quantum IDE drives. Very noisy when thrashed by buildworld/installworld. Had to retire one that was developing bad sectors a few weeks back. Now with the single running softupdates it is no longer thrashed quite as hard. Loss of the striped volume hasn't changed by going from noatime+asynch to noatime w/softupdates. Gained a couple minutes (few %) for buildworlds, but I'll find another pair of newer old drives and swap them in. Jeff Mountin - jeff@mountin.net Systems/Network Administrator FreeBSD - the power to serve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 17:53:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C22B37B67D for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 17:53:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA95190 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:47:30 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id SAA24449; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:47:27 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200002220147.SAA24449@harmony.village.org> To: "D VAN" Subject: Re: strange kernel logs ? Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 20 Feb 2000 14:45:45 +0200." <000f01bf7ba0$6a62d8f0$0201a8c0@DAVID> References: <000f01bf7ba0$6a62d8f0$0201a8c0@DAVID> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:47:27 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <000f01bf7ba0$6a62d8f0$0201a8c0@DAVID> "D VAN" writes: : Feb 20 04:59:25 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 152/100 pps : Feb 20 04:59:26 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 114/100 pps : Feb 20 04:59:27 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 149/100 pps : Feb 20 04:59:28 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 131/100 pps : Feb 20 04:59:29 NYC /kernel: icmp-response bandwidth limit 136/100 pps : : : Anyone know how to fix this and what is causing it ? Yes. There are more than 100 packets per second being sent out as ICMP or RST. Since these limits are in place to help with flooding. : Also why is this happening only now since ive installed named ? You are handling lots of lookups and there are lots of timeouts happening which means that the udp sockets won't have something listening to it when the response come back, which generates a ICMP port unreachables. Fortunately, it is relatively easy to fix. sysctl -w net.inet.icmp.icmplim=200 which will still give you the flood protection w/o impacting your normal operations. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 18:28:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from workhorse.iMach.com (workhorse.iMach.com [206.127.77.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550B037B53D for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:28:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from forrestc@workhorse.iMach.com) Received: from localhost (forrestc@localhost) by workhorse.iMach.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA22023; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:31:29 -0700 (MST) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:31:29 -0700 (MST) From: "Forrest W. Christian" To: "Ljungqvist, Lennart" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Signal 11 error when installing 3.4 STABLE In-Reply-To: <005201bf7cbc$f14fd4e0$0101a8c0@lelle> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Ljungqvist, Lennart wrote: > What is this signal 11 error, and why is it turning my > installation/uppgrading into nothing??? I think it's time to add this to some FAQ somewhere. Signal 11 is a segmentation fault. Although it CAN be a software bug, usually this is caused by a hardware fault. There is a linux-based faq at: http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/ Although some parts are linux-specific, most of the contents of this page are useful for FreeBSD. If you'd like my recommendation on what to look for, I'd recommend: 1) Check/replace your memory and verify related bios settings. 2) Check for a faulty SCSI/IDE controller 3) Double check your memory 4) Try swapping out cards in bus slots, or leaving some out 5) Try a different set of memory chips and check bios settings. 6) Try another processor/motherboard. 7) Did I mention to check your memory and memory-related bios settings? FWIW, I HAVE had one time where a Adaptec 1542 did not like the motherboard it was in and that gave me sig 11's. But usually it is memory. - Forrest W. Christian (forrestc@imach.com) KD7EHZ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- iMach, Ltd., P.O. Box 5749, Helena, MT 59604 http://www.imach.com Solutions for your high-tech problems. (406)-442-6648 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 18:36:25 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C6737B5AC for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:36:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA95198; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:49:03 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id SAA24479; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:49:01 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200002220149.SAA24479@harmony.village.org> To: Udo Erdelhoff Subject: Re: FBSD 4.0 Upgrade Problems Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 20 Feb 2000 02:41:57 +0100." <20000220024156.A2392@nathan.ruhr.de> References: <20000220024156.A2392@nathan.ruhr.de> <20000219103744.P21720@fw.wintelcom.net> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:49:01 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm sorry, that's what's in my private version of UPDATING which I thought I'd committed... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 18:36:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDCEF37B5BD for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:36:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA95192; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:48:22 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id SAA24462; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:48:18 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200002220148.SAA24462@harmony.village.org> To: Udo Erdelhoff Subject: Re: FBSD 4.0 Upgrade Problems Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 20 Feb 2000 02:41:57 +0100." <20000220024156.A2392@nathan.ruhr.de> References: <20000220024156.A2392@nathan.ruhr.de> <20000219103744.P21720@fw.wintelcom.net> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 18:48:18 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20000220024156.A2392@nathan.ruhr.de> Udo Erdelhoff writes: : To update from 3.x to 4.0 stable : -------------------------------- : make world You are wrong. To update from 3.x to 4.0 stable -------------------------------- cd /usr/src make buildworld cd sbin/mknod make install [*] reboot cd /usr/src make -k installworld make installworld [*] You may need to switch from wd to ad ala 19991210 is what it says. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 22:19:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from panzer.kdm.org (panzer.kdm.org [216.160.178.169]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807D737B5D0 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 22:19:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ken@panzer.kdm.org) Received: (from ken@localhost) by panzer.kdm.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) id XAA16622; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 23:17:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ken) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 23:17:25 -0700 From: "Kenneth D. Merry" To: Alexandr Listopad Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): Deferred Error... Message-ID: <20000221231725.A16598@panzer.kdm.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from laa@ZGIA.zp.ua on Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 02:21:31PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 14:21:31 +0200, Alexandr Listopad wrote: > Hi, > > I have FreeBSD-3.4-STABLE > > ...and my HD is: > > da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da0: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 8, 16bit), Tagged Queueing > Enabled > da0: 4340MB (8888924 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 4340C) > da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0 > da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device > da1: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 8, 16bit), Tagged Queueing > Enabled > da1: 4340MB (8888924 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 4340C) > > > yesturday I have this message in the kernel logs: > > > Feb 20 03:36:04 Eagle /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): WRITE(10). CDB: 2a 0 0 49 > a0 df 0 0 10 0 > Feb 20 03:36:04 Eagle /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): Deferred Error: Vendor > Specific info:49a103 asc:80,0 > Feb 20 03:36:04 Eagle /kernel: (da1:ahc0:0:1:0): Vendor Specific ASC field > repla ceable unit: 1e > > > What does it can mean? It's a vendor-specific error. You'll need the drive manual from Seagate to figure out what it means. They may have the manuals on their web site, although I'm not sure about that. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@kdm.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Feb 21 22:39:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.pd.chel.ru (ras.pd.chel.ru [212.57.133.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 420F637B52B for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 22:39:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lw@pd.chel.ru) Received: (qmail 48081 invoked from network); 22 Feb 2000 06:39:18 -0000 Received: from lw.uvd.chel.su (192.168.200.123) by mail.uvd.chel.su with SMTP; 22 Feb 2000 06:39:18 -0000 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 11:42:40 +0500 From: "Sergey A. Ivanov" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.39) Educational Reply-To: "Sergey A. Ivanov" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <11487.000222@pd.chel.ru> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Old good DEC XL with NCR 810 - bug? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello freebsd-stable! I'm trying to install 3.4-release onto old DEC XLpc server. It have ncr 810 onboard SCSI controller. And i have problem: installation can't find any (!) connected to this controller. Controller has been detected correctly as ncr0 device, but no any da devices appears, so i can't proceed with install. BIOS succesfully detect drives, and installation reports all BIOS drives correctly. I can boot to msdos from floppy and fdisk also correctly work with HDD. Can anyone help me? ps. sorry for my english. Best regards, Sergey mailto:lw@pd.chel.ru ICQ UIN: 49432691 http://lw.narod.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 22 1:11: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (csmd2.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De [141.44.22.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0211437B53D; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 01:10:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesse@mail.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De) Received: from knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (jesse@knecht [141.44.21.3]) by csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA08460; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 10:10:54 +0100 (MET) Received: (from jesse@localhost) by knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id KAA21688; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 10:09:56 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de: jesse set sender to jesse@cs.uni-magdeburg.de using -f To: Kris Kennaway Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ports/devel/libtool fails for 3.4-STABLE References: From: Roland Jesse In-Reply-To: Kris Kennaway's message of "Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:14:51 -0800 (PST)" Date: 22 Feb 2000 10:09:56 +0100 Message-ID: <0vd7pp38nv.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Lines: 8 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kris Kennaway writes: > Do you have an older version already installed? Nope, I do not. I even tried going back to 3.4-RELEASE, but the same error there as in 3.4-STABLE. Roland To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 22 1:30:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (csmd2.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De [141.44.22.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1363837B607 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 01:30:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesse@mail.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De) Received: from knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (jesse@knecht [141.44.21.3]) by csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA08609 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 10:30:14 +0100 (MET) Received: (from jesse@localhost) by knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id KAA21710; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 10:29:16 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de: jesse set sender to jesse@cs.uni-magdeburg.de using -f To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: gzip: stdout: Broken pipe References: <0vn1ov3ngf.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> <0vbt5ard4d.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> <0v66vir974.fsf_-_@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> From: Roland Jesse In-Reply-To: Roland Jesse's message of "21 Feb 2000 14:12:15 +0100" Date: 22 Feb 2000 10:29:15 +0100 Message-ID: <0v7lfx37ro.fsf_-_@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Lines: 27 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I wrote > > The buildworld just ran through without a hassle. > > Just FYI: The installworld did not. Right at the end: > -------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> Rebuilding man page indices > -------------------------------------------------------------- > cd /usr/src/share/man; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make makedb > makewhatis /usr/share/man > > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe That seems to be a general problem. As the libtool port does not compile, I tried installing the package: # pkg_add libtool-1.3.3.tgz gzip: stdout: Broken pipe tar: child returned status 1 I put the ktrace/kdump output of the above pkg_add command at http://www.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/~jesse/pkg_add.dump. I would appreciate if someone could take a closer look at this. Roland To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 22 6:54:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from voyager.fisicc-ufm.edu (ip-198-202.guate.net [209.198.197.202]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0297637B6A0 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 06:53:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obonilla@voyager.fisicc-ufm.edu) Received: (from obonilla@localhost) by voyager.fisicc-ufm.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA68505; Mon, 21 Feb 2000 19:53:57 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from obonilla) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 19:53:57 -0600 From: Oscar Bonilla To: Roland Jesse Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error building freshly cvsuped libcrypt Message-ID: <20000221195356.A68482@fisicc-ufm.edu> References: <0vn1ov3ngf.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre1i In-Reply-To: <0vn1ov3ngf.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 04:25:52PM +0100, Roland Jesse wrote: > I cvsuped -stable sources (from cvsup.apfel.de) and security sources > (cvsup.internat.FreeBSD.org) at about 3 pm CET today. > > Doing a `make buildworld` results in: > ------- cut ------- > cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/../../../lib/libmd -I/usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/../../../lib/libcrypt -DNONEXPORTABLE_CRYPT -DLIBC_SCCS -Wall -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c /usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/../../../lib/libcrypt/crypt.c -o crypt.o > /usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/../../../lib/libcrypt/crypt.c: In function `crypt': > /usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/../../../lib/libcrypt/crypt.c:62: warning: unused variable `j' > /usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/../../../lib/libcrypt/crypt.c: At top level: > /usr/src/secure/lib/libcrypt/../../../lib/libcrypt/crypt.c:14: warning: `rcsid' defined but not used > make: don't know how to make crypt-md5.c. Stop > *** Error code 2 i think the problem has to do with the missing file crypt-md5.c somehow it got removed from the sources (i run a mirror and found it in the Attic) from the logs: ---------------------------- revision 1.4 date: 1999/09/20 12:39:59; author: markm; state: dead; lines: +2 -2 Make this completely dependant on the exportable libcrypt, to avoid duplication of effort. Also a large cleanup of the code, inspired by Brandon Gillespie. ---------------------------- i don't think the intention was to remove it. regards, -oscar -- pgp public key: finger obonilla@fisicc-ufm.edu pgp fingerprint: 50 D4 B6 9B DB 7D D8 47 DF 3C ED 39 18 78 DA 8C To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 22 7:10: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from alpha.ply.adelphia.net (alpha.ply.adelphia.net [24.48.30.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900EC37B697 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 07:10:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cyclone@adelphia.net) Received: from brian (dynamic701.ply.adelphia.net [24.48.30.189]) by alpha.ply.adelphia.net (8.9.2/8.9.2) with SMTP id KAA28774 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 10:24:58 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <005101bf7d5f$9d0cf360$bd1e3018@ply.adelphia.net> From: "Brian W. Cornwell" To: Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 10:06:59 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004E_01BF7D1C.8E84FE20" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004E_01BF7D1C.8E84FE20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Brian W.Cornwell ceo Ad Venture Associates ------=_NextPart_000_004E_01BF7D1C.8E84FE20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
Brian W.Cornwell  ceo
Ad Venture=20 Associates
------=_NextPart_000_004E_01BF7D1C.8E84FE20-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 22 8:30:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from PLUTO.forumone.com (host04.forumone.com [207.197.235.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78EC737B715 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 08:30:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adhir@forumone.com) Received: by PLUTO.forumone.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 11:29:57 -0500 Message-ID: From: Alok Dhir To: "'Forrest W. Christian'" , "'Ljungqvist, Lennart'" Cc: "'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG'" Subject: RE: Signal 11 error when installing 3.4 STABLE Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 11:29:56 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If I could add one thing - its typically difficult to accept that these problems are caused by hardware. "But my machine runs Win9x perfectly" is a typical retort when the finger is pointed at hardware. It is important to note that FreeBSD/Linux/etc are significantly more demanding than Win9x, etc, and are much more likely to bring flaky hardware problems to the surface. I've seen Signal 11 many times over the past several years from various versions of FreeBSD and LInux, and so far, it has been caused by bad hardware (usually memory) every time... Al > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Forrest W. > Christian > Sent: Monday, February 21, 2000 8:31 PM > To: Ljungqvist, Lennart > Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: Signal 11 error when installing 3.4 STABLE > > > On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Ljungqvist, Lennart wrote: > > > What is this signal 11 error, and why is it turning my > > installation/uppgrading into nothing??? > > I think it's time to add this to some FAQ somewhere. > > Signal 11 is a segmentation fault. > > Although it CAN be a software bug, usually this is caused by > a hardware > fault. > > There is a linux-based faq at: > http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/ > > Although some parts are linux-specific, most of the contents > of this page > are useful for FreeBSD. > > If you'd like my recommendation on what to look for, I'd recommend: > > 1) Check/replace your memory and verify related bios settings. > 2) Check for a faulty SCSI/IDE controller > 3) Double check your memory > 4) Try swapping out cards in bus slots, or leaving some out > 5) Try a different set of memory chips and check > bios settings. > 6) Try another processor/motherboard. > 7) Did I mention to check your memory and memory-related bios > settings? > > FWIW, I HAVE had one time where a Adaptec 1542 did not like the > motherboard it was in and that gave me sig 11's. > > But usually it is memory. > > - Forrest W. Christian (forrestc@imach.com) KD7EHZ > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > iMach, Ltd., P.O. Box 5749, Helena, MT 59604 http://www.imach.com > Solutions for your high-tech problems. (406)-442-6648 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 22 8:51:47 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from horizon.barak-online.net (horizon.barak.net.il [206.49.94.218]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6D237B6AB for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 08:51:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bk532@iname.com) Received: from localhost.local.net (pop09-1-ras1-p170.barak.net.il [212.150.8.170]) by horizon.barak-online.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA14552; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 18:50:04 +0200 (IST) Received: from iname.com (localhost.local.net [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.local.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA05510; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:37:28 +0200 (IST) (envelope-from bk532@iname.com) Message-ID: <38B2AD32.C05BE0EF@iname.com> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:37:22 +0200 From: Boris Karnaukh Organization: Private person X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Adam D. Marks" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: inetd? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Adam D. Marks" wrote: > > I was curious if it is posible to have different inetd configurations for > different network interfaces. If this is possible in any FreeBSD I would > appreciate any info. check for xinetd in /usr/ports/security/xinetd -- Boris Karnaukh (mailto:bk532@iname.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 22 10:57:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.ruhr.de (ns.ruhr.de [141.39.224.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E79737B73D for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 10:57:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ue@nathan.ruhr.de) Received: (qmail 11278 invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2000 18:57:49 -0000 Received: (from ue@localhost) by nathan.ruhr.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA57826; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 20:01:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ue) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 20:01:36 +0100 From: Udo Erdelhoff To: Warner Losh Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FBSD 4.0 Upgrade Problems Message-ID: <20000222200136.A55446@nathan.ruhr.de> References: <20000220024156.A2392@nathan.ruhr.de> <20000219103744.P21720@fw.wintelcom.net> <20000220024156.A2392@nathan.ruhr.de> <200002220149.SAA24479@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200002220149.SAA24479@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 06:49:01PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I'm sorry No problem... I've just the read the new version of UPDATING (1.70) with the new set of instructions for 3.x->4.x upgrade. I've noticed that you do not mention buildkernel and installkernel (build/install the kernel defined by the shell variable KERNEL with the tools in /usr/obj(!)). The current Makefile (1.233) doesn't document them, either. I've used buildkernel and installkernel for my 3.4/4.x transistion and for my subsequent updaetes and they did what they were supposed to do. Is there any special reason for the lack of documentation? /s/Udo -- "People who claim Windows in superior to Unix are the same people who'd argue that you better use your hand instead of toilet paper to wipe your ass. I can hear them now - 'It's colourful and it's intuitive and easy to use and even a child could do it.'". To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 22 11:36: 1 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from malasada.lava.net (malasada.lava.net [199.222.42.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167E337B6CC for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 11:35:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cliftonr@lava.net) Received: from localhost (1462 bytes) by malasada.lava.net via sendmail with P:stdio/R:inet_hosts/T:smtp (sender: ) (ident using unix) id for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 09:35:38 -1000 (HST) (Smail-3.2.0.106 1999-Mar-31 #3 built 1999-Dec-7) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 09:35:38 -1000 From: Clifton Royston To: Clark Shishido Cc: Ernst de Haan , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kernel panic on `ls -la' on Mac-formatted /dev/fd0 Message-ID: <20000222093538.E14994@lava.net> References: <38B197A7.79930A37@jollem.com> <20000221122050.A48074@desktop.com> <38B19F96.1171B089@jollem.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 12:52:25PM -0800, Clark Shishido wrote: > At 21:27 +0100 2000.02.21, Ernst de Haan wrote: > >The disk is DOS-formatted by a Mac, I believe. I just issue: > > > > mount /mnt/floppy > > > >and my /etc/fstab specifies that /mnt/floppy is /dev/fd0, type msdos > > > > if it's really a Mac floppy with a HFS partition, you'll want to use > hfsutils to mount the floppy, check /usr/ports/emulators/hfsutils. I > haven't used them in a while so I can't quote the command for you. Shouldn't it be considered a bug that the kernel panics, regardless of what's the right command to mount the floppy? -- Clifton -- Clifton Royston -- LavaNet Systems Architect -- cliftonr@lava.net The named which can be named is not the Eternal named. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 22 12: 7:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from manor.msen.com (manor.msen.com [148.59.4.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 547B237B783 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 12:07:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wayne@staff.msen.com) Received: from manor.msen.com (wayne47@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by manor.msen.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA00396 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:06:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wayne@manor.msen.com) Message-Id: <200002222006.PAA00396@manor.msen.com> To: Freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Make fails to propagate variables? Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:06:33 -0500 From: "Michael R. Wayne" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The following line make release RELEASENOUPDATE=1 BUILDNAME=3.4-local CHROOTDIR=/FreeBSDRelease CVSROOT=/tmp should create a release w/o doing any CVS updates. However, it fails with cd /FreeBSDRelease/usr && rm -rf src && cvs -R -d /tmp co -P src cvs checkout: cannot find module `src' - ignored *** Error code 1 I think there is a problem with make failing to properly propagate environment variables to sub shells as I ran across a similar problem when trying to work with any port and a r/o NFS mounted file system. I tried to dig through the makefiles to determine where the problem lies but they're fairly complex and I thought a more experienced set of eyes might be able to pick the problem out quickly. Is this a known issue? I've not seen anything go by on the lists. /\/\ \/\/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 22 12:13:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pawn.primelocation.net (pawn.primelocation.net [205.161.238.235]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A1937B778 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 12:13:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cdf.lists@fxp.org) Received: by pawn.primelocation.net (Postfix, from userid 1016) id BBFF99B17; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:12:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pawn.primelocation.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF01EBA1D; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:12:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:12:16 -0500 (EST) From: "Chris D. Faulhaber" X-Sender: cdf.lists@pawn.primelocation.net To: "Michael R. Wayne" Cc: Freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Make fails to propagate variables? In-Reply-To: <200002222006.PAA00396@manor.msen.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, Michael R. Wayne wrote: > > The following line > > make release RELEASENOUPDATE=1 BUILDNAME=3.4-local CHROOTDIR=/FreeBSDRelease CVSROOT=/tmp > try: make RELEASENOUPDATE=1 BUILDNAME=3.4-local CHROOTDIR=/FreeBSDRelease CVSROOT=/tmp release note: 'release' at the end ----- Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org -------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 22 12:29:10 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.clearsail.net (mail.clearsail.net [207.252.227.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97EC37BE94 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 12:29:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jason@clearsail.net) Received: from clearsail.net (capitan.clearsail.net [208.247.217.194]) by mail.clearsail.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA17647 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 14:14:21 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <38B2F138.C765FCE9@clearsail.net> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 14:27:36 -0600 From: Jason McNew Organization: ClearSail Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: stable installworld fail Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I got the folowing during an installworld (cvsup'd about 1 pm cst 2/22/2000). -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Installing everything.. -------------------------------------------------------------- cd /usr/src; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -f Makefile.inc1 install ===> share/info install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 dir-tmpl /usr/share/info/dir-tmpl ===> include if [ -h /usr/include/cam ]; then rm -f /usr/include/cam; fi if [ -h /usr/include/msdosfs ]; then rm -f /usr/include/msdosfs; fi if [ -h /usr/include/net ]; then rm -f /usr/include/net; fi if [ -h /usr/include/netatalk ]; then rm -f /usr/include/netatalk; fi if [ -h /usr/include/netatm ]; then rm -f /usr/include/netatm; fi if [ -h /usr/include/netgraph ]; then rm -f /usr/include/netgraph; fi if [ -h /usr/include/netinet ]; then rm -f /usr/include/netinet; fi if [ -h /usr/include/netipx ]; then rm -f /usr/include/netipx; fi if [ -h /usr/include/netkey ]; then rm -f /usr/include/netkey; fi if [ -h /usr/include/netns ]; then rm -f /usr/include/netns; fi if [ -h /usr/include/nfs ]; then rm -f /usr/include/nfs; fi if [ -h /usr/include/pccard ]; then rm -f /usr/include/pccard; fi if [ -h /usr/include/posix4 ]; then rm -f /usr/include/posix4; fi if [ -h /usr/include/sys ]; then rm -f /usr/include/sys; fi if [ -h /usr/include/vm ]; then rm -f /usr/include/vm; fi if [ -h /usr/include/isofs ]; then rm -f /usr/include/isofs; fi if [ -h /usr/include/ufs ]; then rm -f /usr/include/ufs; fi if [ -h /usr/include/machine ]; then rm -f /usr/include/machine; fi mtree -deU -f /usr/src/include/../etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p /usr/include cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 cam/*.h /usr/include/cam cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 msdosfs/*.h /usr/include/msdosfs cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 net/*.h /usr/include/net cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 netatalk/*.h /usr/include/netatalk cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 netatm/*.h /usr/include/netatm cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 netgraph/*.h /usr/include/netgraph cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 netinet/*.h /usr/include/netinet cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 netipx/*.h /usr/include/netipx cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 netkey/*.h /usr/include/netkey cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 netns/*.h /usr/include/netns cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 nfs/*.h /usr/include/nfs cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 pccard/*.h /usr/include/pccard cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 posix4/*.h /usr/include/posix4 cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 sys/*.h /usr/include/sys cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 vm/*.h /usr/include/vm cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 isofs/cd9660/*.h /usr/include/isofs/cd9660 cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 ufs/ffs/*.h /usr/include/ufs/ffs cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 ufs/mfs/*.h /usr/include/ufs/mfs cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 ufs/ufs/*.h /usr/include/ufs/ufs cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 cam/scsi/*.h /usr/include/cam/scsi cd /usr/src/include/../sys/i386/include; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 *.h /usr/include/machine cd /usr/src/include; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 a.out.h ar.h assert.h bitstring.h ctype.h db.h dirent.h disktab.h dlfcn.h elf.h err.h fnmatch.h fstab.h fts.h glob.h grp.h strhash.h histedit.h ieeefp.h iso646.h kvm.h limits.h link.h locale.h malloc.h memory.h mpool.h ndbm.h netdb.h nl_types.h nlist.h objformat.h paths.h pthread.h pthread_np.h pwd.h ranlib.h regex.h regexp.h resolv.h rune.h runetype.h setjmp.h sgtty.h signal.h stab.h stddef.h stdio.h stdlib.h string.h stringlist.h strings.h struct.h sysexits.h tar.h time.h timers.h ttyent.h unistd.h utime.h utmp.h vis.h /usr/include cd /usr/src/include/arpa; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 ftp.h inet.h nameser.h nameser_compat.h telnet.h tftp.h /usr/include/arpa cd /usr/src/include/protocols; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 dumprestore.h routed.h rwhod.h talkd.h timed.h /usr/include/protocols cd /usr/src/include/rpc; install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 auth.h auth_unix.h clnt.h pmap_clnt.h pmap_prot.h pmap_rmt.h rpc.h rpc_com.h rpc_msg.h svc.h svc_auth.h types.h xdr.h auth_des.h des.h des_crypt.h /usr/include/rpc install -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/obj/usr/src/include/osreldate.h /usr/include install: /usr/obj/usr/src/include/osreldate.h: No such file or directory *** Error code 71 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. I had annother error doing make buildworld earlier, but I did a 'make clean' and then tried again and that fixed it. Sorry I didn't copy it down. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 22 17:33:31 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.telekabel.nl (arnhem.telekabel.nl [194.134.132.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E19537B71C for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:33:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ernst@jollem.com) Received: from jollem.com (c187104187.telekabel.chello.nl [212.187.104.187]) by mail.telekabel.nl (8.8.8/8.8/EuroNet) with ESMTP id CAA20041; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 02:32:59 +0100 (MET) Message-ID: <38B338CB.741A8CB7@jollem.com> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 02:33:00 +0100 From: Ernst de Haan Organization: Jollem X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en, nl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Clifton Royston Cc: Clark Shishido , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kernel panic on `ls -la' on Mac-formatted /dev/fd0 References: <38B197A7.79930A37@jollem.com> <20000221122050.A48074@desktop.com> <38B19F96.1171B089@jollem.com> <20000222093538.E14994@lava.net> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------791E2A1595BACEB223BE07A0" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------791E2A1595BACEB223BE07A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Clifton, I strongly agree with you. FreeBSD should *never* panic if there's a way to deal with the problem in a different manner. So I consider this one of the few bugs in FreeBSD. But Windows 2000 still has about 62.000 more :-) Ernst Clifton Royston wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 12:52:25PM -0800, Clark Shishido wrote: > > At 21:27 +0100 2000.02.21, Ernst de Haan wrote: > > >The disk is DOS-formatted by a Mac, I believe. I just issue: > > > > > > mount /mnt/floppy > > > > > >and my /etc/fstab specifies that /mnt/floppy is /dev/fd0, type msdos > > > > > > > if it's really a Mac floppy with a HFS partition, you'll want to use > > hfsutils to mount the floppy, check /usr/ports/emulators/hfsutils. I > > haven't used them in a while so I can't quote the command for you. > > Shouldn't it be considered a bug that the kernel panics, regardless of > what's the right command to mount the floppy? > > -- Clifton > > -- > Clifton Royston -- LavaNet Systems Architect -- cliftonr@lava.net > The named which can be named is not the Eternal named. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Ernst de Haan Freelance Java Architect "Come to me all who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest" -- Jesus Christ --------------791E2A1595BACEB223BE07A0 Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii; name="ernst.vcf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Card for Ernst de Haan Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ernst.vcf" begin:vcard n:de Haan;Ernst tel;fax:+31 (0)26 3645634 tel;work:+31 (0)26 3623895 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.znerd.demon.nl/ org:Jollem adr:;;Rozendaalselaan 35;Velp;GLD;6881 KZ;Netherlands version:2.1 email;internet:ernst@jollem.com title:Java Architect fn:Ernst de Haan end:vcard --------------791E2A1595BACEB223BE07A0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 22 17:58:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.desktop.com (mail.desktop.com [166.90.128.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619B837B801 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:58:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from clark@desktop.com) Received: from [192.168.1.42] (jumpgate.desktop.com [166.90.128.243]) by ns.desktop.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id RAA76863 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:58:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from clark@desktop.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: clark@mail.desktop.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <38B338CB.741A8CB7@jollem.com> References: <38B197A7.79930A37@jollem.com> <20000221122050.A48074@desktop.com> <38B19F96.1171B089@jollem.com> <20000222093538.E14994@lava.net> <38B338CB.741A8CB7@jollem.com> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:58:23 -0800 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Clark Shishido Subject: Re: Kernel panic on `ls -la' on Mac-formatted /dev/fd0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ernst de Haan said: >Clifton, > >I strongly agree with you. FreeBSD should *never* panic if there's a way >to deal with the problem in a different manner. So I consider this one of >the few bugs in FreeBSD. But Windows 2000 still has about 62.000 more :-) > >Ernst I did a quick search on "floppy" and found the following relevant looking bugs. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=10828 http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=10959 http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=10870 http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=13632 http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=15486 http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=14590 I wouldn't bother logging another floppy mount bug until these are fixed. Also, the original problem in this case might have been caused by not using hfsutils to mount a HFS floppy. --clark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 22 21:15:58 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18C337B8D9 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 21:15:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA00671; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:15:48 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA33096; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:15:41 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200002230515.WAA33096@harmony.village.org> To: Udo Erdelhoff Subject: Re: FBSD 4.0 Upgrade Problems Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 22 Feb 2000 20:01:36 +0100." <20000222200136.A55446@nathan.ruhr.de> References: <20000222200136.A55446@nathan.ruhr.de> <20000220024156.A2392@nathan.ruhr.de> <20000219103744.P21720@fw.wintelcom.net> <20000220024156.A2392@nathan.ruhr.de> <200002220149.SAA24479@harmony.village.org> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:15:41 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20000222200136.A55446@nathan.ruhr.de> Udo Erdelhoff writes: : I've used buildkernel and installkernel for my 3.4/4.x transistion and for : my subsequent updaetes and they did what they were supposed to do. Is there : any special reason for the lack of documentation? I don't use {build,install}kernel. Beyond that, I'm not sure why they aren't documented. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 22 21:27:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from phoenix.welearn.com.au (phoenix.welearn.com.au [139.130.44.81]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68C0537B93D for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 21:27:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jon@phoenix.welearn.com.au) Received: (from jon@localhost) by phoenix.welearn.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA67928 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 16:26:57 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from jon) Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 16:26:54 +1100 From: Jonathan Michaels To: "'freebsd-stable'" Subject: Re: Signal 11 error when installing 3.4 STABLE Message-ID: <20000223162653.A67290@phoenix.welearn.com.au> Reply-To: jon@welearn.com.au Mail-Followup-To: 'freebsd-stable' References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: ; from Alok Dhir on Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 11:29:56AM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Feb 22, 2000 at 11:29:56AM -0500, Alok Dhir wrote: > If I could add one thing - its typically difficult to accept that these > problems are caused by hardware. "But my machine runs Win9x perfectly" is a > typical retort when the finger is pointed at hardware. > > It is important to note that FreeBSD/Linux/etc are significantly more > demanding than Win9x, etc, and are much more likely to bring flaky hardware > problems to the surface. > > I've seen Signal 11 many times over the past several years from various > versions of FreeBSD and LInux, and so far, it has been caused by bad > hardware (usually memory) every time... another point of view .. or, the last (first and only) time i had serous sig11's was when i ran freebsd+x11+several linux apps in the linux emulator. my problems started when i moved from freebsd-release v2.1.5 to freebsd v2.1.7-release, it was a reproducable fault and only happend with freebsd+x11+linux apps running in the linux emulator. at the time, i had had tested the hardware with ibm os/2 (under load) and a basic qnx installation (with several load tests involving qnx windows -- like x11 but quicker cleaner more reliable etcetc) ... and having the memory replaced 3 times and the rest of teh hardware tested (it is supermicro motherboard, p6sne). i nearly was thrown out by the sech support team who couldn't find any out of spec issues with my hardware. i;d been dealing this that crew for some 10 years and they knew how pedantic i could be about 'out of spec' hardware, but over this issue i nearly destroyed that relationship .. well so many experienced freebsd users can't all be wrong ... that time they were, all of them. cutting a long and made needlessly bitter buy the less than informed comment on the mailinglist the probelm turned out to be the linux code running on in linux emulator that convinced the freebsd kernel that it was a segmentation fault -- sig11. what needs to be stressed in these gotta find a quick fix situations is that the fault is not always the forst most obvious choice in the multiple choice presentation list. i'm not a programmer, i'm no longer as good with hardware as i used to be .. but it was clear to me that the voluminious chorus that kept ranting memory failure really should have checked what they were saying .. it still hurts even 2 years down the track. we all need to take care of the how and the what we say not all people brag about what they have done, where they have been or what qualifications they may or may not have .. its not always possible to see beyound the words on the screen, especially if the person has some handicap, be it esl (english as a second language) some toerh midically regognised 'disability' or just a but hunngover from teh night before. we all need to be aware of what we re saying, especially when it comes to the airy fairy faults that most sig11 seem to be, we all need to listen to what is being said, not to what we would like to have been said, regarding my detailed explanation of the process i'd gone through to prove that it could not have been a bsaic hardware fault and that it was in fact a software and in particular a freebsd fault. i realise that most operating system users are failry one eye'd but that one eyedness should'nt blind us to the fact that freebsd is not the only fish in teh bowl, neither is it the be all and end all the way so called reliable and or bullet proof systems are built. sorry i'll get of my soap box now. i'm just asking that we call to the voice of reason, and an ear of compassion when listening to someone struggling to expalin a probelm that is hard for the particular to explain things, concepts that my be as foreign to that person as say bing disabled is to most of the participant in these mailing lists. regards jonathan -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue Feb 22 21:27:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.Stanford.EDU (smtp.Stanford.EDU [171.64.14.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F98737B8B2 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 21:27:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cscox@Stanford.EDU) Received: from Stanford.EDU (wukong.Stanford.EDU [171.66.40.72]) by smtp.Stanford.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA01769 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2000 21:27:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <38B36FBE.C60B2524@Stanford.EDU> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 21:27:26 -0800 From: Charles Cox X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i386) X-Accept-Language: en, zh-TW, zh-CN MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: (no subject) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG subscribe freebsd-stable To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 23 2:19:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (csmd2.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De [141.44.22.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EB637B822 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 02:19:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesse@mail.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De) Received: from knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (jesse@knecht [141.44.21.3]) by csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA27830; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:19:30 +0100 (MET) Received: (from jesse@localhost) by knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id KAA11359; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:18:32 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:18:32 +0100 From: Roland Jesse To: Walter Campbell Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Mysterious core dumps for make and cc1 on a recent -stable machine Message-ID: <20000223101832.C10991@knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de> References: <20000221001331.A29956@knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Walter Campbell wrote: > Check your memory and level-2 cache, I had the same problem, all due to > faulty L2 Cache Correct. Disabling the external cache brings the machine up and running again. Personally I did not yet experience any performance lost. But it's obviously har to run some benchmarks now. Thanks for the pointer. Roland To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 23 2:56:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.sunesi.net (ns1.sunesi.net [196.15.192.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C9A237B7DF for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 02:56:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nbm@sunesi.net) Received: from nbm by ns1.sunesi.net with local (Exim 3.03 #1) id 12NXbp-000Dgp-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:57:25 +0200 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:57:25 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner To: "Chris D. Faulhaber" Cc: "Michael R. Wayne" , Freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Make fails to propagate variables? Message-ID: <20000223105724.B51890@mithrandr.moria.org> References: <200002222006.PAA00396@manor.msen.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: Organization: Sunesi Clinical Systems X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE i386 X-URL: http://rucus.ru.ac.za/~nbm/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue 2000-02-22 (15:12), Chris D. Faulhaber wrote: > > make release RELEASENOUPDATE=1 BUILDNAME=3.4-local > > CHROOTDIR=/FreeBSDRelease CVSROOT=/tmp > try: > > make RELEASENOUPDATE=1 BUILDNAME=3.4-local CHROOTDIR=/FreeBSDRelease > CVSROOT=/tmp release > > note: 'release' at the end RELEASENOUPDATE is only used by rerelease, not release. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner nbm@rucus.ru.ac.za To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 23 5: 9:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A5137B86D for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 05:09:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za) by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 12NbXY-0000tj-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 15:09:16 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: "Adam D. Marks" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: inetd? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:30:57 PST." Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 15:09:16 +0200 Message-ID: <3454.951311356@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:30:57 PST, "Adam D. Marks" wrote: > I was curious if it is posible to have different inetd configurations for > different network interfaces. If this is possible in any FreeBSD I would > appreciate any info. The information you're looking for _is_ in the manual page, but a little guidance on what to look for wouldn't help. Basically, you want to run _two_ inetd daemons, each bound to a different address (using the -a option). Each daemon is directed to read its own configuration file (the last argument on the command-line). You'll also want the two daemons to use different pidfiles (using the -p option). You can use inetd_flags in /etc/rc.conf to configure the first instance of inetd, but you'll probably have to run the second one out of /etc/rc.local . Have fun! Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 23 8:20:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from manor.msen.com (manor.msen.com [148.59.4.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9668837B94F for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:20:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wayne@staff.msen.com) Received: (from wayne@localhost) by manor.msen.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA64501 for FreeBSD-Stable@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:19:08 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wayne) Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:19:07 -0500 From: "Michael R. Wayne" To: FreeBSD-Stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Make fails to propagate variables? Message-ID: <20000223111907.A55004@manor.msen.com> References: <200002222006.PAA00396@manor.msen.com> <20000223105724.B51890@mithrandr.moria.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000223105724.B51890@mithrandr.moria.org>; from nbm@mithrandr.moria.org on Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 10:57:25AM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 10:57:25AM +0200, Neil Blakey-Milner wrote: > > RELEASENOUPDATE is only used by rerelease, not release. So, as I understand it, there's no way to build a release from the current local copy without doing a CVS to retreive new files? /\/\ \/\/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 23 10:46:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from trinity.skynet.be (trinity.skynet.be [195.238.2.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A7837B994 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:46:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by trinity.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524591223E for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 19:46:40 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 19:46:36 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Brad Knowles Subject: Multiple Adaptec 2940U2W controllers? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Folks, I've got a machine I'm working on, and I'm seeing some unusual problems, so I wanted to get a sanity check. The machine in question is a Dell 1300 with two 450Mhz processors (512KB L2 cache each) and 1GB ECC RAM. In addition to the on-board Adaptec AIC-7890 controller (to which the system disk is attached, a Quantum Atlas IV 9GB), I have two Adaptec 2940U2W controllers. Each of these two controllers is attached to a different interface on a Hitachi/Comparex D1400 mainframe-style refrigerator-size drive array, with twenty 18GB Seagate 10kRPM "Cheetah" disks (plus one hot spare not currently being used) spread across five internal SCSI channels, and with 1GB ECC battery backed-up write-back cache (mirrored between the two controllers, so effective size is halved). On this machine, I have installed FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE (I cvsup'ed late last week, so it should be fairly up-to-date). Needless to say, we would expect this system to pretty much scream at disk I/O. Of course, this is precisely what it is not doing. Fortunately, all the work I have been doing over the last few days is in preparation for a Hitachi/Comparex performance expert to come in tomorrow and help us tune this thing for maximum performance from their perspective, but I'm seeing something weird from the host side and I'd like to ask if anyone else has seen anything similar. In particular, when we run the "postmark" benchmark on a single filesystem, we get some decent results (although not nearly as good as we'd like). When we run the same benchmark on two different filesystems mounted through two different controllers, well, performance really goes into the toilet -- the result is about 1/10th as fast as the single filesystem test. But, when we test the same two filesystems mounted through the same Adaptec controller, we see each test get almost exactly half the performance of the single filesystem test. This just doesn't make any sense to me. If anything, I would expect the dual controller configuration to result in each postmark benchmark getting nearly as much throughput as the single filesystem test, so that the aggregate is almost twice as much. But instead, it's ten times as slow?!? This just boggles my mind, and I don't have the first clue where to go looking to see what the problem might be. Is there any additional information I could provide that might prove helpful? Could there be conflicts of some sort between the two Adaptec 2940U2W controllers? Thanks for any and all advice, observations, and assistance you can provide! -- These are my opinions and should not be taken as official Skynet policy _________________________________________________________________________ |o| Brad Knowles, Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o| |o| Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o| |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/726.93.11 B-1140 Brussels |o| |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o| \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside. Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 23 14:11:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from trinity.skynet.be (trinity.skynet.be [195.238.2.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3958D37B9AF for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 14:11:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by trinity.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A220A122FF for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 23:11:29 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 23:11:19 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: Multiple Adaptec 2940U2W controllers? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 7:46 PM +0100 2000/2/23, Brad Knowles wrote: > The machine in question is a Dell 1300 with two 450Mhz processors > (512KB L2 cache each) and 1GB ECC RAM. In addition to the on-board > Adaptec AIC-7890 controller (to which the system disk is attached, > a Quantum Atlas IV 9GB), I have two Adaptec 2940U2W controllers. I've gotten a couple of people that have responded with somewhat different advice. One thought it was likely to be a problem with the PCI bridge chip, the other with SMP. I have switched to a non-SMP kernel (otherwise identical to what I was previously running), I have tried moving both of the 2940U2W controllers to either the primary or secondary PCI busses (on the primary, one of them shared IRQs with the AIC-7890 controller, but on the secondary although they share the PCI bus with the AIC-7890 controller they all at least have different IRQs and I/O Base Addresses). So far, nothing has worked. I can't do it tonight, but maybe tomorrow sometime I can dig up one of those bloody Pentium III terminator cards and actually physically remove one of the CPUs to see if that makes a difference. Anyway, here's the latest dmesg output (with all three SCSI controllers on the secondary PCI bus): $ dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-1999 FreeBSD Inc. Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE #0: Wed Feb 23 20:12:27 CET 2000 root@audrey.skynet.be:/usr/src/sys/compile/ONECPU Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz Timecounter "TSC" frequency 448622884 Hz CPU: Pentium III (448.62-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x673 Stepping = 3 Features=0x383fbff> real memory = 1073741824 (1048576K bytes) avail memory = 1042796544 (1018356K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0297000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled Probing for devices on PCI bus 0: chip0: rev 0x03 on pci0.0.0 chip1: rev 0x03 on pci0.1.0 chip2: rev 0x03 on pci0.2.0 chip3: rev 0x02 on pci0.7.0 ide_pci0: rev 0x01 on pci0.7.1 chip4: rev 0x02 on pci0.7.3 fxp0: rev 0x05 int a irq 14 on pci0.16.0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:90:27:99:13:1a Probing for devices on PCI bus 1: vga0: rev 0x7a on pci1.0.0 Probing for devices on PCI bus 2: ahc0: rev 0x00 int a irq 11 on pci2.9.0 ahc0: aic7890/91 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs ahc1: rev 0x00 int a irq 10 on pci2.10.0 ahc1: aic7890/91 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs ahc2: rev 0x01 int a irq 14 on pci2.11.0 ahc2: aic7890/91 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs Probing for devices on the ISA bus: sc0 on isa sc0: VGA color <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x0> atkbdc0 at 0x60-0x6f on motherboard atkbd0 irq 1 on isa psm0 not found sio0 at 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa sio0: type 16550A sio1 at 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa sio1: type 16550A fdc0 at 0x3f0-0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: 1.44MB 3.5in wdc0 not found at 0x1f0 scd0 not found at 0x230 ppc0 at 0x378 irq 7 flags 0x40 on isa ppc0: SMC-like chipset (ECP/EPP/PS2/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppc0: FIFO with 16/16/8 bytes threshold vga0 at 0x3b0-0x3df maddr 0xa0000 msize 131072 on isa npx0 on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface IP Filter: initialized. Default = pass all, Logging = enabled Waiting 5 seconds for SCSI devices to settle changing root device to da0da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da1: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 136470MB (279490560 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 17397C) da3 at ahc1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da3: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da3: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da3: 136470MB (279490560 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 17397C) da2 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 1 da2: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da2: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da2: 136470MB (279490560 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 17397C) da4 at ahc1 bus 0 target 0 lun 1 da4: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da4: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da4: 136470MB (279490560 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 17397C) da0 at ahc2 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-3 device da0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 31, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 8683MB (17783249 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 1106C) Thanks! -- These are my opinions and should not be taken as official Skynet policy _________________________________________________________________________ |o| Brad Knowles, Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o| |o| Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o| |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/726.93.11 B-1140 Brussels |o| |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o| \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside. Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 23 14:47:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95BB37B9EA; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 14:47:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id OAA28559; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 14:47:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 14:47:57 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: Oscar Bonilla Cc: Roland Jesse , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Error building freshly cvsuped libcrypt In-Reply-To: <20000221195356.A68482@fisicc-ufm.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Oscar Bonilla wrote: > > make: don't know how to make crypt-md5.c. Stop > > *** Error code 2 > > i think the problem has to do with the missing file crypt-md5.c > somehow it got removed from the sources (i run a mirror and found it > in the Attic) > > from the logs: > > ---------------------------- > revision 1.4 > date: 1999/09/20 12:39:59; author: markm; state: dead; lines: +2 -2 > Make this completely dependant on the exportable libcrypt, to avoid > duplication of effort. Also a large cleanup of the code, inspired > by Brandon Gillespie. > ---------------------------- > > i don't think the intention was to remove it. If this was true, wouldn't you expect buildworld to have been broken for the past 5 months? ;-) It's only gone in 4.0. The original person was probably cvsupping his secure/ sources to -CURRENT, not -STABLE. Kris ---- "How many roads must a man walk down, before you call him a man?" "Eight!" "That was a rhetorical question!" "Oh..then, seven!" -- Homer Simpson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 23 15: 3:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mecca.servint.com (mecca.servint.com [209.50.225.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D3AA37B53C for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 15:02:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from loschert@servint.com) Received: from delft.servint.com (207-172-61-232.s232.tnt1.rcm.va.dialup.rcn.com [207.172.61.232]) by mecca.servint.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id SAA07081 for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 18:15:17 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 11827 invoked by uid 1000); 23 Feb 2000 23:02:35 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Feb 2000 23:02:35 -0000 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 18:02:35 -0500 (EST) From: Matt Loschert To: "Michael R. Wayne" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Make fails to propagate variables? In-Reply-To: <20000223111907.A55004@manor.msen.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-73061238-951346955=:11813" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --0-73061238-951346955=:11813 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Michael R. Wayne wrote: > So, as I understand it, there's no way to build a release from the > current local copy without doing a CVS to retreive new files? I actually was looking into this about a week ago. Applying the attached patch to /usr/src/release/Makefile replaces the cvs checkout with a recursive copy from local sources. Note: I had to use -L with cp since my /usr/src is a symlink. If your local cvsup'd repo is in /usr/src/, /usr/ports, and /usr/doc, set CVSROOT to /usr and the patch should do the trick. BTW, I still haven't gotten make release to work all the way through. My build stops while trying to run makewhatis in the chroot'ed build environment. I can't figure out why, so maybe I *am* doing something wrong. Anyway, good luck. -- Matt Loschert Software Engineer ServInt Internet Services --0-73061238-951346955=:11813 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="Makefile.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Makefile.diff" LS0tIE1ha2VmaWxlCVdlZCBEZWMgMTUgMTk6NTk6NTggMTk5OQ0KKysrIE1h a2VmaWxlLmxvY2FscmVwbwlXZWQgRmViIDIzIDE3OjQ3OjA0IDIwMDANCkBA IC0xNzAsMTMgKzE3MCw4IEBADQogCWZvciBpIGluICR7Qk9PVFNUUkFQVVRJ TFN9IDsgZG8gXA0KIAkJY3AgLXAgJHtDSFJPT1RESVJ9JCRpICR7Q0hST09U RElSfS8ke0JPT1RTVFJBUERJUn0gOyBcDQogCWRvbmUNCi0uaWYgIWRlZmlu ZWQoUkVMRUFTRVRBRykNCiAJY2QgJHtDSFJPT1RESVJ9L3VzciAmJiBybSAt cmYgc3JjICYmIFwNCi0JCWN2cyAtUiAtZCAke0NWU1JPT1R9IGNvIC1QICR7 UkVMRUFTRVNSQ01PRFVMRX0NCi0uZWxzZQ0KLQljZCAke0NIUk9PVERJUn0v dXNyICYmIHJtIC1yZiBzcmMgJiYgXA0KLQkJY3ZzIC1SIC1kICR7Q1ZTUk9P VH0gY28gLVAgLXIgJHtSRUxFQVNFVEFHfSAke1JFTEVBU0VTUkNNT0RVTEV9 DQotLmVuZGlmDQorCQljcCAtUkwgJHtDVlNST09UfS8ke1JFTEVBU0VTUkNN T0RVTEV9ICR7UkVMRUFTRVNSQ01PRFVMRX0NCiAuaWYgZGVmaW5lZChMT0NB TF9QQVRDSEVTKSAmJiBleGlzdHMoJHtMT0NBTF9QQVRDSEVTfSkNCiAJY2Qg JHtDSFJPT1RESVJ9L3Vzci9zcmMgJiYgcGF0Y2ggJHtQQVRDSF9GTEFHU30g PCAke0xPQ0FMX1BBVENIRVN9DQogLmVuZGlmDQpAQCAtMTg0LDcgKzE3OSw3 IEBADQogCWNkICR7Q0hST09URElSfSAmJiBlbnYgQ0hST09URElSPSR7Q0hS T09URElSfSBCVUlMRE5BTUU9JHtCVUlMRE5BTUV9IFJFTEVBU0VUQUc9JHtS RUxFQVNFVEFHfSAke0xPQ0FMX1NDUklQVH0NCiAuZW5kaWYNCiAuaWYgIWRl ZmluZWQoTk9QT1JUUykNCi0JY2QgJHtDSFJPT1RESVJ9L3VzciAmJiBybSAt cmYgcG9ydHMgJiYgY3ZzIC1SIC1kICR7Q1ZTUk9PVH0gY28gLVAgJHtSRUxF QVNFUE9SVFNNT0RVTEV9ICYmIGNkIHBvcnRzICYmIG1ha2UgcmVhZG1lcyBQ T1JUU0RJUj0ke0NIUk9PVERJUn0vdXNyL3BvcnRzDQorCWNkICR7Q0hST09U RElSfS91c3IgJiYgcm0gLXJmIHBvcnRzICYmIGNwIC1STCAke0NWU1JPT1R9 LyR7UkVMRUFTRVBPUlRTTU9EVUxFfSAke1JFTEVBU0VQT1JUU01PRFVMRX0g JiYgY2QgcG9ydHMgJiYgbWFrZSByZWFkbWVzIFBPUlRTRElSPSR7Q0hST09U RElSfS91c3IvcG9ydHMNCiAuZW5kaWYNCiAuaWYgIWRlZmluZWQoTk9ET0Mp DQogCWNkICR7Q0hST09URElSfS91c3IgJiYgcm0gLXJmIGRvYyAmJiBjdnMg LVIgLWQgJHtDVlNST09UfSBjbyAtUCAke1JFTEVBU0VET0NNT0RVTEV9DQo= --0-73061238-951346955=:11813-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Feb 23 15:19:55 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from voyager.fisicc-ufm.edu (ip-198-202.guate.net [209.198.197.202]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C8537B9FE; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 15:19:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obonilla@voyager.fisicc-ufm.edu) Received: (from obonilla@localhost) by voyager.fisicc-ufm.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA06461; Wed, 23 Feb 2000 17:18:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from obonilla) Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 17:18:25 -0600 From: Oscar Bonilla To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Oscar Bonilla , Roland Jesse , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Error building freshly cvsuped libcrypt Message-ID: <20000223171825.B6384@fisicc-ufm.edu> References: <20000221195356.A68482@fisicc-ufm.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre1i In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 02:47:57PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Oscar Bonilla wrote: > > > > make: don't know how to make crypt-md5.c. Stop > > > *** Error code 2 > > > > i think the problem has to do with the missing file crypt-md5.c > > somehow it got removed from the sources (i run a mirror and found it > > in the Attic) > > > > from the logs: > > > > ---------------------------- > > revision 1.4 > > date: 1999/09/20 12:39:59; author: markm; state: dead; lines: +2 -2 > > Make this completely dependant on the exportable libcrypt, to avoid > > duplication of effort. Also a large cleanup of the code, inspired > > by Brandon Gillespie. > > ---------------------------- > > > > i don't think the intention was to remove it. > > If this was true, wouldn't you expect buildworld to have been broken for > the past 5 months? ;-) It's only gone in 4.0. > > The original person was probably cvsupping his secure/ sources to > -CURRENT, not -STABLE. > actually so was i. i checked the supfiles and found i was getting cvs-src from tag=RELENG_3 and cvs-crypto from tag=. ok, pass the pointy hat. -oscar -- pgp public key: finger obonilla@fisicc-ufm.edu pgp fingerprint: 50 D4 B6 9B DB 7D D8 47 DF 3C ED 39 18 78 DA 8C To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 24 1: 0:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (csmd2.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De [141.44.22.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6C437BBAF; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 01:00:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesse@mail.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De) Received: from knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (jesse@knecht [141.44.21.3]) by csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA12339; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 10:00:24 +0100 (MET) Received: (from jesse@localhost) by knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id JAA00161; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 09:59:25 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 09:59:25 +0100 From: Roland Jesse To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Oscar Bonilla , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Error building freshly cvsuped libcrypt Message-ID: <20000224095925.B29660@knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de> References: <20000221195356.A68482@fisicc-ufm.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3i In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kris Kennaway wrote: > The original person was probably cvsupping his secure/ sources to > -CURRENT, not -STABLE. That was me, and yes it's true. I cvsupped src-all using tag=RELENG_3 and crypto using RELENG=. That's what happens when one simply copies over the provided cvsup file examples without checking their settings in detail. Roland To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 24 7: 5:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from trinity.skynet.be (trinity.skynet.be [195.238.2.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A45737BC32 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 07:05:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by trinity.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D2C12349 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:05:09 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:04:50 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: Multiple Adaptec 2940U2W controllers? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 11:11 PM +0100 2000/2/23, Brad Knowles wrote: > I have switched to a non-SMP kernel (otherwise identical to what > I was previously running), I have tried moving both of the 2940U2W > controllers to either the primary or secondary PCI busses (on the > primary, one of them shared IRQs with the AIC-7890 controller, but > on the secondary although they share the PCI bus with the AIC-7890 > controller they all at least have different IRQs and I/O Base > Addresses). So far, nothing has worked. After working with the experts from Germany and the local field engineers, it appears that the problem was within the drive array configuration. It has two controllers (with one UltraSCSI 2 LVD interface each), and the two logical units on the array are accessible via both of them and visible to the host as two different devices. Although I was mounting only one each of the two logical units, it appears that control over these LUs was ping-ponging back and forth between the two controllers, thus trashing my throughput. Now that the problem has been fixed, initial preliminary test results indicate that I do actually see almost 2x speedup using two host SCSI controllers to the two different drive array controllers. I'm now moving one of the host SCSI adaptors back to the other PCI bus, to see if that helps, hurts, or makes no difference to the performance. If it doesn't hurt, I plan on leaving them on separate PCI busses. Afterwards, we're going to delete and recreate the logical units on the controller, so that we have a separate device for each column of disks (half of which will be made available through each controller), and then we're going to try software striping across the columns. This ought to be fun! ;-) -- These are my opinions and should not be taken as official Skynet policy _________________________________________________________________________ |o| Brad Knowles, Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o| |o| Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o| |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/726.93.11 B-1140 Brussels |o| |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o| \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside. Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 24 7:48:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from trinity.skynet.be (trinity.skynet.be [195.238.2.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A0437BD63 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 07:48:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by trinity.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533E912301 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:47:59 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:47:04 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: Multiple Adaptec 2940U2W controllers? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 4:04 PM +0100 2000/2/24, Brad Knowles wrote: > Now that the problem has been fixed, initial preliminary test > results indicate that I do actually see almost 2x speedup using > two host SCSI controllers to the two different drive array > controllers. I'm now moving one of the host SCSI adaptors back > to the other PCI bus, to see if that helps, hurts, or makes no > difference to the performance. > > If it doesn't hurt, I plan on leaving them on separate PCI busses. Blargh. It does appear to hurt. I'm trying the two 2940U2W controllers on the primary PCI bus with the on-board AIC-7890 controller hard-wired to the secondary PCI bus. If that doesn't work (and I don't suspect it will, but I want to test it for the sake of completeness), then for this machine the only solution appears to be to put SCSI controllers on the secondary PCI bus and everything else on the primary PCI bus. If that's the case, I'm going to be quite annoyed. That will mean that I cannot expand the number of SCSI busses in this machine by just adding more controllers. Instead, I will be forced to increase the number of SCSI channels by swapping out the current controllers and using 3950U2W controllers instead. Blargh. Double blargh. Blargh, say I. BTW, is anybody at all actually interested in this stuff, or am I just talking to myself? -- These are my opinions and should not be taken as official Skynet policy _________________________________________________________________________ |o| Brad Knowles, Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o| |o| Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o| |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/726.93.11 B-1140 Brussels |o| |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o| \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside. Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 24 8:27: 7 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ramstind.gtf.ol.no (ramstind.gtf.ol.no [128.39.174.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4EC637B82C for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 08:27:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from trond@ramstind.gtf.ol.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by ramstind.gtf.ol.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA37996; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:26:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@ramstind.gtf.ol.no) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:26:55 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= To: Brad Knowles Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Multiple Adaptec 2940U2W controllers? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Brad Knowles wrote: > BTW, is anybody at all actually interested in this stuff, or am I > just talking to myself? I find this quite interesting, I might also wind up installing and administer such «beasts» one day. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Trond Endrestøl | trond@gtf.ol.no Merkantilvegen 59HB7, | trond@ramstind.gtf.ol.no N-2815 GJØVIK, NORWAY |+47 61139424 || +47 63874242 Patron of The Art of Computer Programming| FreeBSD 3.4 & Pine 4.21 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 24 8:32:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from morpheus.skynet.be (morpheus.skynet.be [195.238.2.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F47437C068 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 08:32:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.1.121] (brad.techos.skynet.be [195.238.1.121]) by morpheus.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1E0CC40 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:32:08 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:28:45 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: Multiple Adaptec 2940U2W controllers? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 4:47 PM +0100 2000/2/24, Brad Knowles wrote: > Blargh. It does appear to hurt. After having received positive feedback on these reports from several people, I will continue posting updates. Thanks, folks. I can really use the support right now. > I'm trying the two 2940U2W > controllers on the primary PCI bus with the on-board AIC-7890 > controller hard-wired to the secondary PCI bus. Bugger. That doesn't work, either. I guess I should have paid more attention to the clue silk-screened on the motherboard near the first slot in the secondary PCI bus that says "RAID Upgradeable PCI slot", and another clue silk-screened elsewhere close by that said something like "Insert NICs into primary PCI bus only". Sigh.... I guess we get to buy a couple of 3950U2Ws, and maybe hold on to these 2940U2Ws and see if they can ever be useful in another project sometime. It looks like the PCI bridge chip is a real issue with this particular hardware configuration, and so far as I can tell, using SMP doesn't seem to make a difference. After confirming that everything is working okay again, we get to go back to reconfiguring the RAID array, doing horizontal striping across the logical units, seeing what happens when I add softupdates, etc.... I'll post results here when I've got 'em. Thanks everyone! -- These are my opinions and should not be taken as official Skynet policy _________________________________________________________________________ |o| Brad Knowles, Belgacom Skynet NV/SA |o| |o| Systems Architect, Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin Rue Col. Bourg, 124 |o| |o| Phone/Fax: +32-2-706.13.11/726.93.11 B-1140 Brussels |o| |o| http://www.skynet.be Belgium |o| \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Unix is like a wigwam -- no Gates, no Windows, and an Apache inside. Unix is very user-friendly. It's just picky who its friends are. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 24 8:52:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F7937BC75; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 08:52:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (kris@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id IAA09678; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 08:52:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: kris owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 08:52:53 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: Roland Jesse Cc: "Sean O'Connell" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bad magic number in "/usr/lib/libc.so.3" In-Reply-To: <20000221145543.A10265@knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Roland Jesse wrote: > ldconfig_paths_aout="/usr/lib/compat/aout /usr/X11R6/lib/aout /usr/local/lib/aout" > > The error message says `bad magic number in "/usr/lib/libc.so.3"'. That's > what makes me wonder. Does ldconfig -r -aout think you have an aout libc? Kris ---- "How many roads must a man walk down, before you call him a man?" "Eight!" "That was a rhetorical question!" "Oh..then, seven!" -- Homer Simpson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 24 9:11: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from me.ru (shell.me.ru [194.247.134.139]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12CE237BDEA for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 09:10:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ilya@zhurnal.ru) Received: from [194.247.147.206] (HELO webmaster.zhurnal.ru) by me.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.2) with ESMTP id 137897 for stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 20:10:54 +0300 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 20:14:30 +0300 From: Ilya Obshadko X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.39) Educational Reply-To: Ilya Obshadko Organization: Zhurnal.RU X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <6843.000224@zhurnal.ru> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: NFS client lockup? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I've experienced NFS client lockup that hangs entire box. There is no any diagnostic messages, network interface is active (I can ping the system), but system is not responding at all, I'm unable to reboot it with Ctrl-Alt-Del. This occurs only under high NFS-mounted filesystem load with concurrent read/write requests. At the moment of lockup, top shows processes that use NFS in "nfsrcv" state. Does anybody knows what is this? Can NFS server be responsible for that? (NFS server is Solaris 7/x86, it doesn't produce any error messages too). I'm running: FreeBSD 3.4-RC #25: Fri Dec 10 19:16:55 MSK 1999 Best regards, Ilya mailto:ilya@zhurnal.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 24 11: 5:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vcnet.com (mail.vcnet.com [209.239.239.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DD1037BDC8 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 11:05:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jpr@vcnet.com) Received: (qmail 97180 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2000 19:05:26 -0000 Received: from joff.vc.net (HELO ?209.239.239.22?) (209.239.239.22) by mail.vcnet.com with SMTP; 24 Feb 2000 19:05:26 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 11:05:25 -0800 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Jon Rust Subject: Re: good network card (xl0 packet dropping) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 1:03 AM -0500 2/18/00, Will Saxon wrote: >What was the problem? I had a problem once doing the same thing with mine, >but it was user error - the other side was 100mbit full duplex and I had >forgotten to enable full-duplex. REALLY slow :P. > This is why I won't use 10/100 Intel cards. I've had numerous problems with them and my cisco cat 2924. They really don't seem to like talking to another auto-negotiating device. I end up having to manually set one side (or both) to get it to work. An unnecessary pain in the arse if you ask me. It's been a while since I tried, so maybe it was a driver issue and was fixed. For my money, the Kingston kne100tx's work fine, and the lne100tx's from Linksys do as well. No superlatives, they just work. jon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 24 11:23:20 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sstar.com (sstar.com [209.102.160.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF03337BD42 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 11:22:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from king@sstar.com) Received: from JKING ([134.132.75.164]) by sstar.com with ESMTP (IPAD 2.52) id 1956300; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 13:22:11 -0600 Message-Id: <4.2.0.58.20000224132002.00a70e98@mail.sstar.com> X-Sender: king@mail.sstar.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.0.58 Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 13:22:11 -0600 To: Jon Rust , stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Jim King Subject: Re: good network card (xl0 packet dropping) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 11:05 AM 2/24/2000 -0800, Jon Rust wrote: >At 1:03 AM -0500 2/18/00, Will Saxon wrote: >>What was the problem? I had a problem once doing the same thing with mine, >>but it was user error - the other side was 100mbit full duplex and I had >>forgotten to enable full-duplex. REALLY slow :P. > >This is why I won't use 10/100 Intel cards. I've had numerous problems >with them and my cisco cat 2924. They really don't seem to like talking to >another auto-negotiating device. I end up having to manually set one side >(or both) to get it to work. An unnecessary pain in the arse if you ask >me. It's been a while since I tried, so maybe it was a driver issue and >was fixed. For my money, the Kingston kne100tx's work fine, and the >lne100tx's from Linksys do as well. No superlatives, they just work. YMMV. In my office we had a Catalyst (5000?) that wouldn't auto-negotiate with TI Thunderlan NICs, but does fine with Intel and 3Com. Jim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 24 11:41:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from germanium.xtalwind.net (germanium.xtalwind.net [205.160.242.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C372837BC3C for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 11:41:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jack@germanium.xtalwind.net) Received: from localhost (jack@localhost) by germanium.xtalwind.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA01859; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 14:41:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 14:41:38 -0500 (EST) From: jack To: Jon Rust Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: good network card (xl0 packet dropping) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Today Jon Rust wrote: > This is why I won't use 10/100 Intel cards. I've had numerous > problems with them and my cisco cat 2924. They really don't seem to > like talking to another auto-negotiating device. Strange. I've got five 10/100 Intel's in FreeBSD boxes here that get along just fine with a 2916, auto-negotiate 100 full-duplex every time. 'Course that isn't too often since those things tend to stay up. The one that was in a w95 box synced up correctly quite frequently. :) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jack O'Neill Systems Administrator / Systems Analyst jack@germanium.xtalwind.net Crystal Wind Communications, Inc. Finger jack@germanium.xtalwind.net for my PGP key. PGP Key fingerprint = F6 C4 E6 D4 2F 15 A7 67 FD 09 E9 3C 5F CC EB CD enriched, vcard, HTML messages > /dev/null -------------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 24 12: 1:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peak.mountin.net (peak.mountin.net [207.227.119.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E0637C299 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 12:01:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jeff-ml@mountin.net) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by peak.mountin.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id OAA22780; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 14:01:09 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from jeff-ml@mountin.net) Received: from dial-95.max1.wa.cyberlynk.net(207.227.118.95) by peak.mountin.net via smap (V1.3) id sma022778; Thu Feb 24 14:00:41 2000 Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.20000224135943.00a175e0@207.227.119.2> X-Sender: jeff-ml@207.227.119.2 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 13:59:43 -0600 To: Jon Rust , stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" Subject: Re: good network card (xl0 packet dropping) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 11:05 AM 2/24/00 -0800, Jon Rust wrote: >This is why I won't use 10/100 Intel cards. I've had numerous >problems with them and my cisco cat 2924. They really don't seem to >like talking to another auto-negotiating device. I end up having to >manually set one side (or both) to get it to work. An unnecessary >pain in the arse if you ask me. It's been a while since I tried, so >maybe it was a driver issue and was fixed. For my money, the Kingston >kne100tx's work fine, and the lne100tx's from Linksys do as well. No >superlatives, they just work. Judging from the other responses and from my experience with 29xx and 19xx you seems be the odd man out. The Intel's worked with either FBSD or Win 9x/NT no problem. Betting on a diver issue. Jeff Mountin - jeff@mountin.net Systems/Network Administrator FreeBSD - the power to serve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 24 12:15:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vcnet.com (mail.vcnet.com [209.239.239.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A768837B815 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 12:15:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jpr@vcnet.com) Received: (qmail 42827 invoked from network); 24 Feb 2000 20:15:15 -0000 Received: from joff.vc.net (HELO ?209.239.239.22?) (209.239.239.22) by mail.vcnet.com with SMTP; 24 Feb 2000 20:15:15 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.20000224135943.00a175e0@207.227.119.2> References: <3.0.3.32.20000224135943.00a175e0@207.227.119.2> Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2000 12:15:13 -0800 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Jon Rust Subject: Re: good network card (xl0 packet dropping) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 1:59 PM -0600 2/24/00, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote: >Judging from the other responses and from my experience with 29xx and 19xx >you seems be the odd man out. The Intel's worked with either FBSD or Win >9x/NT no problem. > >Betting on a diver issue. Heh. Just my luck. :-) Ah well, like I said, the lne100tx and kne100tx suit me just fine anyway. jon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 24 14:44: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns.itga.com.au (ns.itga.com.au [202.53.40.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2AB937B90E for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 14:44:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from lightning.itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by ns.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA96792; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 09:43:53 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from gnb@itga.com.au) Received: from itga.com.au (lightning.itga.com.au [192.168.71.20]) by lightning.itga.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA00169; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 09:43:52 +1100 (EST) Message-Id: <200002242243.JAA00169@lightning.itga.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.1 12/23/97 From: Gregory Bond To: Jon Rust Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: good network card (xl0 packet dropping) In-reply-to: Your message of Thu, 24 Feb 2000 11:05:25 -0800. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 09:43:52 +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > This is why I won't use 10/100 Intel cards. I've had numerous > problems with them and my cisco cat 2924. We use dozens of Intel cards with Cisco cat 5000-series switches, no problems at all, FreeBSD & NT4. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 24 23: 7:59 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bulldozer.arcom.spb.su (bulldozer.arcom.spb.su [195.190.100.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6601E37BE10 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2000 23:07:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from serg@tanigawa.spb.ru) Received: from tanigawa.UUCP (uucp@localhost) by bulldozer.arcom.spb.su (8) with UUCP id KAA27965 for FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:05:50 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from serg@tanigawa.spb.ru) From: serg@tanigawa.spb.ru Received: (qmail 2649 invoked by uid 1001); 24 Feb 2000 21:49:19 -0000 Date: 24 Feb 2000 21:49:19 -0000 Message-ID: <20000224214919.2648.qmail@tanigawa.spb.ru> To: FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-URL: file://localhost/usr/share/doc/handbook/book.html X-Mailer: Lynx, Version 2.8.2rel.1 Subject: subscribe Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG subscribe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 25 2:26:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (csmd2.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De [141.44.22.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8651A37B959; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 02:26:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jesse@mail.CS.Uni-Magdeburg.De) Received: from knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (jesse@knecht [141.44.21.3]) by csmd2.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA25731; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:26:08 +0100 (MET) Received: (from jesse@localhost) by knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) id LAA26242; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:25:08 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: knecht.cs.uni-magdeburg.de: jesse set sender to jesse@cs.uni-magdeburg.de using -f To: Kris Kennaway Cc: "Sean O'Connell" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bad magic number in "/usr/lib/libc.so.3" References: From: Roland Jesse In-Reply-To: Kris Kennaway's message of "Thu, 24 Feb 2000 08:52:53 -0800 (PST)" Date: 25 Feb 2000 11:25:08 +0100 Message-ID: <0vema11svv.fsf@cs.uni-magdeburg.de> Lines: 7 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kris Kennaway writes: > Does ldconfig -r -aout think you have an aout libc? Yo, the LD_LIBRARY_PATH just needs to be unset. Roland To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 25 3:35:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6609637BB09 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 03:35:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 25 Feb 2000 11:35:35 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:35:32 +0000 From: David Malone To: Ilya Obshadko Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS client lockup? Message-ID: <20000225113532.A49913@walton.maths.tcd.ie> References: <6843.000224@zhurnal.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <6843.000224@zhurnal.ru>; from ilya@zhurnal.ru on Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 08:14:30PM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 08:14:30PM +0300, Ilya Obshadko wrote: > I've experienced NFS client lockup that hangs entire box. There > is no any diagnostic messages, network interface is active (I can > ping the system), but system is not responding at all, I'm unable to > reboot it with Ctrl-Alt-Del. This occurs only under high NFS-mounted > filesystem load with concurrent read/write requests. At the moment > of lockup, top shows processes that use NFS in "nfsrcv" state. Your best hope of finding what the problem, is to compile in the kernel debugger and leave yourself on the text console. When the machine locks up break to the debugger and get a trace, it can be worth doing this a few times by continuing the kernel and getting another trace so you can try to figure out where in the code the kernel is stuck. We've managed to diagnose problems like this fairly quickly as long as the problem is fairly easy to reproduce. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 25 7:20:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mecca.servint.com (mecca.servint.com [209.50.225.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC77537BDBD for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 07:20:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from loschert@servint.com) Received: from delft.servint.com (207-172-86-207.s207.tnt6.rcm.va.dialup.rcn.com [207.172.86.207]) by mecca.servint.com (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id KAA06955 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:33:21 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 57584 invoked by uid 1000); 25 Feb 2000 15:15:36 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 25 Feb 2000 15:15:36 -0000 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:15:36 -0500 (EST) From: Matt Loschert To: "Michael R. Wayne" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Make fails to propagate variables? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-649964617-951491736=:50874" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --0-649964617-951491736=:50874 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Matt Loschert wrote: > I actually was looking into this about a week ago. Applying the attached > patch to /usr/src/release/Makefile replaces the cvs checkout with a > recursive copy from local sources. Note: I had to use -L with cp since my > /usr/src is a symlink. > > If your local cvsup'd repo is in /usr/src/, /usr/ports, and /usr/doc, set > CVSROOT to /usr and the patch should do the trick. > > BTW, I still haven't gotten make release to work all the way through. My > build stops while trying to run makewhatis in the chroot'ed build > environment. I can't figure out why, so maybe I *am* doing something > wrong. Anyway, good luck. I was looking at the make release procedure again this morning and rereading my email and diff and realized that I left out a necessary change in the original diff. Attached is one that should work. Also, I realized my problem with makewhatis was that it was looking for an installed perl in the chroot'ed environment. My original buildworld had been done with NOPERL=true specified in make.conf, hence no perl. I am retrying again as I write this. Anyway, again, good luck, and hope this helps. Matt -- Matt Loschert Software Engineer ServInt Internet Services --0-649964617-951491736=:50874 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="Makefile.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Makefile.diff" LS0tIE1ha2VmaWxlLmRpc3QJRnJpIEZlYiAyNSAxMDowNjowMiAyMDAwDQor KysgTWFrZWZpbGUubG9jYWxyZXBvCUZyaSBGZWIgMjUgMTA6MDc6NTYgMjAw MA0KQEAgLTE3MCwxMyArMTcwLDggQEANCiAJZm9yIGkgaW4gJHtCT09UU1RS QVBVVElMU30gOyBkbyBcDQogCQljcCAtcCAke0NIUk9PVERJUn0kJGkgJHtD SFJPT1RESVJ9LyR7Qk9PVFNUUkFQRElSfSA7IFwNCiAJZG9uZQ0KLS5pZiAh ZGVmaW5lZChSRUxFQVNFVEFHKQ0KIAljZCAke0NIUk9PVERJUn0vdXNyICYm IHJtIC1yZiBzcmMgJiYgXA0KLQkJY3ZzIC1SIC1kICR7Q1ZTUk9PVH0gY28g LVAgJHtSRUxFQVNFU1JDTU9EVUxFfQ0KLS5lbHNlDQotCWNkICR7Q0hST09U RElSfS91c3IgJiYgcm0gLXJmIHNyYyAmJiBcDQotCQljdnMgLVIgLWQgJHtD VlNST09UfSBjbyAtUCAtciAke1JFTEVBU0VUQUd9ICR7UkVMRUFTRVNSQ01P RFVMRX0NCi0uZW5kaWYNCisJCWNwIC1STCAke0NWU1JPT1R9LyR7UkVMRUFT RVNSQ01PRFVMRX0gJHtSRUxFQVNFU1JDTU9EVUxFfQ0KIC5pZiBkZWZpbmVk KExPQ0FMX1BBVENIRVMpICYmIGV4aXN0cygke0xPQ0FMX1BBVENIRVN9KQ0K IAljZCAke0NIUk9PVERJUn0vdXNyL3NyYyAmJiBwYXRjaCAke1BBVENIX0ZM QUdTfSA8ICR7TE9DQUxfUEFUQ0hFU30NCiAuZW5kaWYNCkBAIC0xODQsMTAg KzE3OSwxMCBAQA0KIAljZCAke0NIUk9PVERJUn0gJiYgZW52IENIUk9PVERJ Uj0ke0NIUk9PVERJUn0gQlVJTEROQU1FPSR7QlVJTEROQU1FfSBSRUxFQVNF VEFHPSR7UkVMRUFTRVRBR30gJHtMT0NBTF9TQ1JJUFR9DQogLmVuZGlmDQog LmlmICFkZWZpbmVkKE5PUE9SVFMpDQotCWNkICR7Q0hST09URElSfS91c3Ig JiYgcm0gLXJmIHBvcnRzICYmIGN2cyAtUiAtZCAke0NWU1JPT1R9IGNvIC1Q ICR7UkVMRUFTRVBPUlRTTU9EVUxFfSAmJiBjZCBwb3J0cyAmJiBtYWtlIHJl YWRtZXMgUE9SVFNESVI9JHtDSFJPT1RESVJ9L3Vzci9wb3J0cw0KKwljZCAk e0NIUk9PVERJUn0vdXNyICYmIHJtIC1yZiBwb3J0cyAmJiBjcCAtUkwgJHtD VlNST09UfS8ke1JFTEVBU0VQT1JUU01PRFVMRX0gJHtSRUxFQVNFUE9SVFNN T0RVTEV9ICYmIGNkIHBvcnRzICYmIG1ha2UgcmVhZG1lcyBQT1JUU0RJUj0k e0NIUk9PVERJUn0vdXNyL3BvcnRzDQogLmVuZGlmDQogLmlmICFkZWZpbmVk KE5PRE9DKQ0KLQljZCAke0NIUk9PVERJUn0vdXNyICYmIHJtIC1yZiBkb2Mg JiYgY3ZzIC1SIC1kICR7Q1ZTUk9PVH0gY28gLVAgJHtSRUxFQVNFRE9DTU9E VUxFfQ0KKwljZCAke0NIUk9PVERJUn0vdXNyICYmIHJtIC1yZiBkb2MgJiYg Y3AgLVJMICR7Q1ZTUk9PVH0vJHtSRUxFQVNFRE9DTU9EVUxFfSAke1JFTEVB U0VET0NNT0RVTEV9DQogCWlmIFsgLWQgJHtESVNURklMRVN9LyBdOyB0aGVu IFwNCiAJCWNwIC1ycCAke0RJU1RGSUxFU30gJHtDSFJPT1RESVJ9L3Vzci9w b3J0cy9kaXN0ZmlsZXM7IFwNCiAJZmkNCg== --0-649964617-951491736=:50874-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 25 10:59: 0 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from polio.ecst.csuchico.edu (polio.ecst.csuchico.edu [132.241.4.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A10F837B9C1 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:58:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from amarks@ecst.csuchico.edu) Received: (qmail 825 invoked by uid 20393); 25 Feb 2000 10:58:53 -0800 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:58:53 -0800 (PST) From: "Adam D. Marks" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: printer question Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Has anyone had any luck printing to a remote printer using jetdirect. I have a HP 2100 on a JetDirect EX Plus 3. The closest I got is with using rlpr but the format that is printed is messed up. Thanks, Adam To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 25 11: 3:43 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from horst.bfd.com (horst.bfd.com [12.9.219.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C4E737B884 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:03:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ejs@bfd.com) Received: from HARLIE.bfd.com (bastion.bfd.com [12.9.219.14]) by horst.bfd.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA26228; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:03:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ejs@bfd.com) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:03:36 -0800 (PST) From: "Eric J. Schwertfeger" To: "Adam D. Marks" Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: printer question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Adam D. Marks wrote: > Has anyone had any luck printing to a remote printer using jetdirect. I > have a HP 2100 on a JetDirect EX Plus 3. The closest I got is with using > rlpr but the format that is printed is messed up. I've got an HP2100TN, and have never had a problem printing to it. lp|hp2100:\ :sh:\ :rm=hp2100tn:rp=text:sd=/var/spool/output/lpd:\ :lf=/var/log/lpd-errs:mx#0: Both plain text and postscript print fine with this config (the TN has HP's PS clone built in). Makes me wish the HP4Plus's at work had PS. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 25 11:48: 8 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hub.ucsb.edu (hub.ucsb.edu [128.111.24.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B518A37BAFD for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:48:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from behl@ucsb.edu) Received: from kahuna.ucsb.edu ([128.111.27.27]) by hub.ucsb.edu with esmtp id 12OQiY-0005ct-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:48:02 -0800 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:46:46 -0800 (Pacific Standard Time) From: Jeff Behl To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-X-Sender: behl@mail.engr.ucsb.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi all, I get the following when doing a 'make aout-to-elf-build' on a 2.2.8 system that I'm trying to upgrade to 3.4. The source is up to date (cvsup'd this morning). Any ideas? ===> bin/df cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/bin/df/../../sbin/mount -Wall -Wformat -I/usr/obj/aout/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c /usr/src/bin/df/df.c cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/bin/df/../../sbin/mount -Wall -Wformat -I/usr/obj/aout/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c /usr/src/bin/df/../../sbin/mount/vfslist.c cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/bin/df/../../sbin/mount -Wall -Wformat -I/usr/obj/aout/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -static -o df df.o vfslist.o df.o: Undefined symbol `_ilogb' referenced from text segment *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop. -- Jeff Behl behl@ucsb.edu Campus Network Programmer (805) 893-5311 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 25 12:54: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61A237B939 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:54:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from slave (doug@slave [10.0.0.1]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA18746; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:54:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:54:00 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton X-Sender: doug@dt051n0b.san.rr.com To: Jeff Behl Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrading from 2.2.8 -> 3.4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 25 Feb 2000, Jeff Behl wrote: > Hi all, > > I get the following when doing a 'make aout-to-elf-build' on a 2.2.8 > system that I'm trying to upgrade to 3.4. The source is up to date > (cvsup'd this morning). Any ideas? Please check the e-mail archives before posting questions of this sort (yes, they are back up now). This has been covered recently several times. The answer to your question is that this is a known problem. Upgrading from 2.2.8-Stable -> 3.2-Release is known to work. If you have a chance to try upgrading to 3.3-Release please report back to the list with your results. Thanks, Doug -- "Welcome to the desert of the real." - Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Feb 25 21:51:42 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from camelot.bitart.com (camelot.BITart.com [206.103.221.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA36437BC5C for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2000 21:51:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gerti@bitart.com) Received: (qmail 26472 invoked by uid 101); 26 Feb 2000 05:51:17 -0000 Message-ID: <20000226055117.26471.qmail@camelot.bitart.com> Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 4.2mach v148) X-Nextstep-Mailer: Mail 4.2mach (Enhance 2.2p1) Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.148) From: Gerd Knops Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 23:51:16 -0600 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: inetd -l does not log Reply-To: gerti-freebsds@BITart.com Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, man inetd states: When given the -l option inetd will log an entry to syslog each time a connection is accepted, noting the service selected and the IP-number of the remote requestor if available. On my 3.4 stable system no such thing happens if inetd is started with the -l flag. Gerd To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 26 2: 7:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6BB6E37BBD1 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 02:06:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 26 Feb 2000 10:05:42 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 10:05:41 +0000 From: David Malone To: gerti-freebsds@bitart.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: inetd -l does not log Message-ID: <20000226100541.A89550@walton.maths.tcd.ie> References: <20000226055117.26471.qmail@camelot.bitart.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20000226055117.26471.qmail@camelot.bitart.com>; from gerti@bitart.com on Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 11:51:16PM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 11:51:16PM -0600, Gerd Knops wrote: > When given the -l option inetd will log an entry to syslog each time a > connection is accepted, noting the service selected and the IP-number of > the remote requestor if available. It's logged at level info - are you sure you're logging these messages somewhere? Check and see if you can see the messages when you add: *.* myusername in /etc/syslog.conf and killall -HUP syslogd. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 26 2:28:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from camelot.bitart.com (camelot.BITart.com [206.103.221.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4EF8F37BCCC for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 02:21:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gerti@bitart.com) Received: (qmail 26850 invoked by uid 101); 26 Feb 2000 10:20:30 -0000 Message-ID: <20000226102030.26849.qmail@camelot.bitart.com> Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 4.2mach v148) In-Reply-To: <20000226100541.A89550@walton.maths.tcd.ie> X-Nextstep-Mailer: Mail 4.2mach (Enhance 2.2p1) Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.148) From: Gerd Knops Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 04:20:29 -0600 To: David Malone Subject: Re: inetd -l does not log Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Reply-To: gerti-freebsds@bitart.com References: <20000226055117.26471.qmail@camelot.bitart.com> <20000226100541.A89550@walton.maths.tcd.ie> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David Malone wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 11:51:16PM -0600, Gerd Knops wrote: > > > When given the -l option inetd will log an entry to syslog each time a > > connection is accepted, noting the service selected and the IP-number of > > the remote requestor if available. > > It's logged at level info - are you sure you're logging these messages > somewhere? Check and see if you can see the messages when you add: > > *.* myusername > > in /etc/syslog.conf and killall -HUP syslogd. > I have this in my syslog.conf *amingst other things): !inetd *.* /dev/console And I did HUP syslogd. killed inetd, and run it 'by hand' using 'inetd -d -l -w -W'. No dice. Gerd To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 26 2:53:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E3EB637BEAC for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 02:53:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 26 Feb 2000 10:53:34 +0000 (GMT) To: gerti-freebsds@bitart.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: inetd -l does not log In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 26 Feb 2000 04:20:29 CST." <20000226102030.26849.qmail@camelot.bitart.com> X-Request-Do: Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 10:53:34 +0000 From: David Malone Message-ID: <200002261053.aa90559@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I have this in my syslog.conf *amingst other things): > > !inetd > *.* /dev/console > > And I did HUP syslogd. killed inetd, and run it 'by hand' using 'inetd -d -l > -w -W'. No dice. One thing that isn't immediately obvious is that the logging is controled by tcp wrappers code if the service is wrapped. However you should ger log messages anyway. It seems to work for me on 3.4: walton# cat /tmp/inetd.conf dbbrowse stream tcp nowait dwmalone /bin/cat /etc/fstab walton# inetd -d -w -W -l /tmp/inetd.conf ADD : dbbrowse proto=tcp accept=1 max=0 user=dwmalone group=(null) class=daemon builtin=0x0 server=/bin/cat inetd: enabling dbbrowse, fd 4 inetd: registered /bin/cat on 4 inetd: someone wants dbbrowse inetd: accept, ctrl 6 inetd: + closing from 5 inetd: 89797 execl /bin/cat inetd: Handling signal flag C inetd: 89797 reaped, status 0 ^C walton# tail /var/log/tcp_log | fgrep 89797 Feb 26 10:44:00 walton inetd[89797]: connection from slip2.maths.tcd.ie, service cat (tcp) walton# tail -1 /etc/hosts.allow ALL: ALL : rfc931 2 : severity local0.info : setenv WRAP_INFO %s_%c : allow walton# fgrep tcp_log /etc/syslog.conf local0.debug /var/log/tcp_log David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 26 3: 6:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from camelot.bitart.com (camelot.BITart.com [206.103.221.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 421E337BC1B for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 03:06:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gerti@bitart.com) Received: (qmail 26953 invoked by uid 101); 26 Feb 2000 11:06:09 -0000 Message-ID: <20000226110609.26952.qmail@camelot.bitart.com> Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 4.2mach v148) In-Reply-To: <200002261053.aa90559@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> X-Nextstep-Mailer: Mail 4.2mach (Enhance 2.2p1) Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.148) From: Gerd Knops Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 05:06:09 -0600 To: David Malone Subject: Re: inetd -l does not log Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Reply-To: gerti-freebsds@bitart.com, References: <200002261053.aa90559@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG David Malone wrote: > > I have this in my syslog.conf *amingst other things): > > > > !inetd > > *.* /dev/console > > > > And I did HUP syslogd. killed inetd, and run it 'by hand' using 'inetd -d > > -l -w -W'. No dice. > > One thing that isn't immediately obvious is that the logging is controled > by tcp wrappers code if the service is wrapped. However you should ger log > messages anyway. It seems to work for me on 3.4: > > walton# cat /tmp/inetd.conf > dbbrowse stream tcp nowait dwmalone /bin/cat /etc/fstab > > walton# inetd -d -w -W -l /tmp/inetd.conf > ADD : dbbrowse proto=tcp accept=1 max=0 user=dwmalone group=(null) > class=daemon builtin=0x0 server=/bin/cat > inetd: enabling dbbrowse, fd 4 > inetd: registered /bin/cat on 4 > inetd: someone wants dbbrowse > inetd: accept, ctrl 6 > inetd: + closing from 5 > inetd: 89797 execl /bin/cat > inetd: Handling signal flag C > inetd: 89797 reaped, status 0 > ^C > That I get with or without the -l flag to inetd. What I really wanted though is the remote IP, as those paragraphs from the inetd man page promise: When given the -l option inetd will log an entry to syslog each time a connection is accepted, noting the service selected and the IP-number of the remote requestor if available. ... If the -l option is specified, all connection attempts are logged, whether they are allowed, denied or not wrapped at all. Otherwise, only denied requests will be logged. Gerd To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 26 3:16:22 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B06F137BFFF for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 03:16:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 26 Feb 2000 11:16:15 +0000 (GMT) To: gerti-freebsds@bitart.com Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: inetd -l does not log In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 26 Feb 2000 05:06:09 CST." <20000226110609.26952.qmail@camelot.bitart.com> X-Request-Do: Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 11:16:15 +0000 From: David Malone Message-ID: <200002261116.aa91916@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > That I get with or without the -l flag to inetd. What I really wanted though > is the remote IP, as those paragraphs from the inetd man page promise: The connection was logged in the tcp_log, but I guess it logged the host name instead of the IP. AFAIK the hostname will only be logged by inetd if the tcp wrapping is turned on, and tcp wrappers are sure that both the forward and reverse DNS entries match. If it is for a particular service, you could run an inetd without wrapping enabeled - that will always log an IP. Otherwise you could do some magic with hosts.allow which logs the IP to a file for you. I haven't tested it , but you should be able to do something like: service : ALL : spawn logger -p local1.info Connection from $a : allow in /etc/hosts.allow. David. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 26 14:31:44 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp7.atl.mindspring.net (smtp7.atl.mindspring.net [207.69.128.51]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344FB37B52D for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 14:31:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from igiveup@ix.netcom.com) Received: from ix.netcom.com (user-2iniahc.dialup.mindspring.com [165.121.42.44]) by smtp7.atl.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA21692; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 17:31:25 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <38B85437.5F4C0298@ix.netcom.com> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 14:31:19 -0800 From: Ben Speirs X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Polstra Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55 References: <200002022143.NAA89098@vashon.polstra.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG John Polstra wrote: > > In article , > Max Khon wrote: > > > > the fix was MFC'ed on Jan 28. > > make sure that you have src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c,v 1.3.2.2 > > Oops, I just realized my previous reply was wrong. You are right > about JDK -- the fix in lockdflt.c should make it work. The later > fix affected linuxthreads, not JDK. > > John > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message John, I have a similar message that is generated while running wine on FreeBSD-Stable built on Feb 7. Here is the output: ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:54 Would this be related to the threads portion that is still being worked on? I ask because I also get a message saying "Abort trap (core dumped)" but part of the program keeps running. Thanks. -- -Ben Speirs To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 26 15:50:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bolero-x.rahul.net (bolero.rahul.net [192.160.13.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0629637BE28 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 15:50:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dhesi@rahul.net) Received: from bolero.rahul.net by bolero-x.rahul.net with SMTP id AA25745 (5.67b8/IDA-1.5 for ); Sat, 26 Feb 2000 15:50:06 -0800 Received: from q.bolero.rahul.net (bolero.rahul.net [192.160.13.1]) by bolero.rahul.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 6973B3FF09 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 15:50:05 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 25721 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2000 23:50:05 -0000 Received: from waltz.rahul.net (192.160.13.9) by bolero.rahul.net with SMTP; 26 Feb 2000 23:50:05 -0000 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: disk repair on SunOS Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 15:50:03 -0800 From: Rahul Dhesi Message-Id: <20000226235005.6973B3FF09@bolero.rahul.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG A disk on one of my machines that run SunOS was showing a frequent error: Feb 24 15:04:26 samba vmunix: sd16f: Error for command 'read(10)' Feb 24 15:04:26 samba vmunix: sd16f: Error Level: Retryable Feb 24 15:04:26 samba vmunix: sd16f: Block 2032880, Absolute Block: 6717879 Feb 24 15:04:26 samba vmunix: sd16f: Sense Key: Media Error Feb 24 15:04:26 samba vmunix: sd16f: Vendor 'SEAGATE' error code: 0x11 I put the machine into single-user mode, unmounted the filesystem on that disk, invoked the format command, selected that disk, gave the 'repair' command, and when asked for the block number, I typed 6717879. It said the block had been repaired. I exited the format utility and went back into multiuser mode. My questions for the FreeBSD experts: - How does SunOS do it? - Could FreeBSD do it too? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 26 17:18:15 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sanson.reyes.somos.net (freyes.static.inch.com [216.223.199.224]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1444837B5FD for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 17:18:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fran@reyes.somos.net) Received: from tomasa (tomasa.reyes.somos.net [10.0.0.11]) by sanson.reyes.somos.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id UAA12348 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 20:12:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from fran@reyes.somos.net) Message-Id: <200002270112.UAA12348@sanson.reyes.somos.net> From: "Francisco Reyes" To: "FreeBSD Stable List" Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 20:03:33 -0500 Reply-To: "Francisco Reyes" X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.10.2010) For Windows 98 (4.10.2222) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Does sendmail.cf gets replaced by stable? Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Does the /etc/sendmail.cf gets replaced by stable? I use mergemaster and I don't recall copying that file, however my sendmail stopped working recently after I CVSupped made world. I rebuilt cf file from an mc file I had previously used and all was well, but I don't recall having this problem before. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 26 17:34:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dervish.mail.pipex.net (dervish.mail.pipex.net [158.43.192.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C40937B58D for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 17:34:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mark@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: (qmail 1431 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2000 01:34:04 -0000 Received: from userbm40.uk.uudial.com (HELO marder-1.) (62.188.144.246) by smtp.dial.pipex.com with SMTP; 27 Feb 2000 01:34:04 -0000 Received: (from mark@localhost) by marder-1. (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA01269; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 01:33:55 GMT (envelope-from mark) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 01:33:54 +0000 From: Mark Ovens To: Rahul Dhesi Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disk repair on SunOS Message-ID: <20000227013354.E327@marder-1> References: <20000226235005.6973B3FF09@bolero.rahul.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000226235005.6973B3FF09@bolero.rahul.net>; from dhesi@rahul.net on Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 03:50:03PM -0800 Organization: Total lack of Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 03:50:03PM -0800, Rahul Dhesi wrote: > A disk on one of my machines that run SunOS was showing a frequent > error: > > Feb 24 15:04:26 samba vmunix: sd16f: Error for command 'read(10)' > Feb 24 15:04:26 samba vmunix: sd16f: Error Level: Retryable > Feb 24 15:04:26 samba vmunix: sd16f: Block 2032880, Absolute Block: 6717879 > Feb 24 15:04:26 samba vmunix: sd16f: Sense Key: Media Error > Feb 24 15:04:26 samba vmunix: sd16f: Vendor 'SEAGATE' error code: 0x11 > > I put the machine into single-user mode, unmounted the filesystem on > that disk, invoked the format command, selected that disk, gave the > 'repair' command, and when asked for the block number, I typed 6717879. > It said the block had been repaired. I exited the format utility and > went back into multiuser mode. > > My questions for the FreeBSD experts: > > - How does SunOS do it? > - Could FreeBSD do it too? > I don't know, but those errors mean the disk is on it's way out. I'd replace it if I were you. > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Microsoft: Where do you want to go today? Linux: Where do you want to go tomorrow? BSD: Are you guys coming, or what? -Poster at LinuxWorld 2000 ________________________________________________________________ FreeBSD - The Power To Serve http://www.freebsd.org My Webpage http://ukug.uk.freebsd.org/~mark/ mailto:mark@ukug.uk.freebsd.org http://www.radan.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 26 17:39:48 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from monsoon.mail.pipex.net (monsoon.mail.pipex.net [158.43.128.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5154237BEAB for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 17:39:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mark@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: (qmail 8973 invoked from network); 27 Feb 2000 01:39:36 -0000 Received: from userbm40.uk.uudial.com (HELO marder-1.) (62.188.144.246) by smtp.dial.pipex.com with SMTP; 27 Feb 2000 01:39:36 -0000 Received: (from mark@localhost) by marder-1. (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA01293; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 01:39:27 GMT (envelope-from mark) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 01:39:27 +0000 From: Mark Ovens To: Francisco Reyes Cc: FreeBSD Stable List Subject: Re: Does sendmail.cf gets replaced by stable? Message-ID: <20000227013926.F327@marder-1> References: <200002270112.UAA12348@sanson.reyes.somos.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200002270112.UAA12348@sanson.reyes.somos.net>; from fran@reyes.somos.net on Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 08:03:33PM -0500 Organization: Total lack of Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 08:03:33PM -0500, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Does the /etc/sendmail.cf gets replaced by stable? > I use mergemaster and I don't recall copying that file, however > my sendmail stopped working recently after I CVSupped made > world. I rebuilt cf file from an mc file I had previously used > and all was well, but I don't recall having this problem before. > mergemaster will ask you if you wish to replace this file. As to why sendmail stopped working could it be that sendmail itself had been updated? Once after I'd cvsup'd and made the world (but didn't replace sendmail.cf) sendmail started bitching about sendmail.cf being for an older version of sendmail, although sendmail still worked, but then I just use a simple ISP dial-up for mail. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Microsoft: Where do you want to go today? Linux: Where do you want to go tomorrow? BSD: Are you guys coming, or what? -Poster at LinuxWorld 2000 ________________________________________________________________ FreeBSD - The Power To Serve http://www.freebsd.org My Webpage http://ukug.uk.freebsd.org/~mark/ mailto:mark@ukug.uk.freebsd.org http://www.radan.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 26 20: 5:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from panzer.kdm.org (panzer.kdm.org [216.160.178.169]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD2A37B576 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 20:05:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ken@panzer.kdm.org) Received: (from ken@localhost) by panzer.kdm.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) id VAA29092; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 21:01:21 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ken) Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 21:01:21 -0700 From: "Kenneth D. Merry" To: Rahul Dhesi Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: disk repair on SunOS Message-ID: <20000226210121.A28630@panzer.kdm.org> References: <20000226235005.6973B3FF09@bolero.rahul.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20000226235005.6973B3FF09@bolero.rahul.net>; from dhesi@rahul.net on Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 03:50:03PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 15:50:03 -0800, Rahul Dhesi wrote: > A disk on one of my machines that run SunOS was showing a frequent > error: > > Feb 24 15:04:26 samba vmunix: sd16f: Error for command 'read(10)' > Feb 24 15:04:26 samba vmunix: sd16f: Error Level: Retryable > Feb 24 15:04:26 samba vmunix: sd16f: Block 2032880, Absolute Block: 6717879 > Feb 24 15:04:26 samba vmunix: sd16f: Sense Key: Media Error > Feb 24 15:04:26 samba vmunix: sd16f: Vendor 'SEAGATE' error code: 0x11 > > I put the machine into single-user mode, unmounted the filesystem on > that disk, invoked the format command, selected that disk, gave the > 'repair' command, and when asked for the block number, I typed 6717879. > It said the block had been repaired. I exited the format utility and > went back into multiuser mode. > > My questions for the FreeBSD experts: > > - How does SunOS do it? It is likely that they remapped the block. I don't know whether they actually recovered the data that was in the block. I think it's unlikely, since that's a medium error of some sort. Unfortunately the above reports the sense key and additional sense code, but not the additional sense code qualifier. > - Could FreeBSD do it too? Yes. There's no really easy way to remap blocks at the moment, but you can do it with camcontrol. First, make sure that read and write reallocation are turned on in mode page 1. Then you can issue a write(6) or write(10) command using 'camcontrol cmd' with null data. The drive will remap the block for you. To find out the format of SCSI write commands, see the SCSI drafts at www.t10.org. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@kdm.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 26 21:30:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D0337B550 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 21:30:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA18264; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 22:30:11 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id WAA64001; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 22:30:01 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200002270530.WAA64001@harmony.village.org> To: "Kenneth D. Merry" Subject: Re: disk repair on SunOS Cc: Rahul Dhesi , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 26 Feb 2000 21:01:21 MST." <20000226210121.A28630@panzer.kdm.org> References: <20000226210121.A28630@panzer.kdm.org> <20000226235005.6973B3FF09@bolero.rahul.net> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 22:30:01 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20000226210121.A28630@panzer.kdm.org> "Kenneth D. Merry" writes: : First, make sure that read and write reallocation are turned on in mode : page 1. Then you can issue a write(6) or write(10) command using : 'camcontrol cmd' with null data. The drive will remap the block for you. How is this different than 'dd of=/dev/rdaX if=/dev/zero oseek=XXX'? I've turned on read/write reallocation in page 1 in a drive I have here. I did a dd for the entire drive, and I still have sectors I can't read. After doing the remapping via the adaptech 19160 controller for a few sectors, they read fine. It looks like there are about 100 of bad sectors clustered 3 at a time every cylendar or so. It appears that the defect list of the drive was lost.... : To find out the format of SCSI write commands, see the SCSI drafts at : www.t10.org. I was afraid that you'd say that. :-) I suppose this is the same thing that the test media function of a adaptech controller bios, no? Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 26 21:51:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from panzer.kdm.org (panzer.kdm.org [216.160.178.169]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D89437B5C5 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 21:51:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ken@panzer.kdm.org) Received: (from ken@localhost) by panzer.kdm.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) id WAA29585; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 22:47:37 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ken) Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 22:47:37 -0700 From: "Kenneth D. Merry" To: Warner Losh Cc: Rahul Dhesi , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: disk repair on SunOS Message-ID: <20000226224737.A29523@panzer.kdm.org> References: <20000226210121.A28630@panzer.kdm.org> <20000226235005.6973B3FF09@bolero.rahul.net> <20000226210121.A28630@panzer.kdm.org> <200002270530.WAA64001@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200002270530.WAA64001@harmony.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 10:30:01PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 22:30:01 -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <20000226210121.A28630@panzer.kdm.org> "Kenneth D. Merry" writes: > : First, make sure that read and write reallocation are turned on in mode > : page 1. Then you can issue a write(6) or write(10) command using > : 'camcontrol cmd' with null data. The drive will remap the block for you. > > How is this different than 'dd of=/dev/rdaX if=/dev/zero oseek=XXX'? It's more or less the same thing. I like to do it with camcontrol, though, so I can be sure I'm getting the right block. :) I suppose that /dev/rdaX starts at the beginning of the drive, no matter what your partition layout is? In any case, using camcontrol usually isn't that hard, since you can often use the same CDB that was printed out in the error message, and change the read opcode to the corresponding 6, 10 or 12-byte write opcode. > I've turned on read/write reallocation in page 1 in a drive I have > here. I did a dd for the entire drive, and I still have sectors I > can't read. After doing the remapping via the adaptech 19160 > controller for a few sectors, they read fine. It looks like there are > about 100 of bad sectors clustered 3 at a time every cylendar or so. > It appears that the defect list of the drive was lost.... Maybe the drive didn't want to remap the sectors automatically for some reason. > : To find out the format of SCSI write commands, see the SCSI drafts at > : www.t10.org. > > I was afraid that you'd say that. :-) > > I suppose this is the same thing that the test media function of a > adaptech controller bios, no? Test media? You mean verify? No. When they're testing or verifying media, they probably just try to read every block on the disk, When they can't read a block, they then probably issue a reassign blocks command for the sectors that they couldn't read. That's probably what SunOS is doing as well, I guess. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@kdm.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Feb 26 23:51: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33BD37B60C for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 23:50:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Received: from gorean.org (doug@master [10.0.0.2]) by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA01800; Sat, 26 Feb 2000 23:50:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Doug@gorean.org) Message-ID: <38B8D751.46D842C6@gorean.org> Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 23:50:41 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Francisco Reyes Cc: FreeBSD Stable List Subject: Re: Does sendmail.cf gets replaced by stable? References: <200002270112.UAA12348@sanson.reyes.somos.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Francisco Reyes wrote: > > Does the /etc/sendmail.cf gets replaced by stable? Not sure what you mean by "replaced by stable." It does not get replaced in a make/build world. > I use mergemaster and I don't recall copying that file, however > my sendmail stopped working recently after I CVSupped made > world. I rebuilt cf file from an mc file I had previously used > and all was well, but I don't recall having this problem before. mergemaster does not install any files that you don't tell it to. However you saved yourself by the first rule of mergemaster, always have good backups. :) Doug -- "Welcome to the desert of the real." - Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message