From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Apr 29 0:21:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ns.internet.dk (ns.internet.dk [194.19.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9164637B422 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 00:21:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ns.internet.dk (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f3T7LHW11357 for freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG.AVP; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 09:21:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ns.internet.dk (8.11.2/8.11.2) with UUCP id f3T7LGe11343; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 09:21:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: from gina (gina.neland.dk [192.168.5.100] (may be forged)) by arnold.neland.dk (8.11.3/8.11.0) with SMTP id f3T7L5d96037; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 09:21:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Message-ID: <00b601c0d07d$23069fe0$6405a8c0@neland.dk> From: "Leif Neland" To: "Steve Ames" , References: <200104290631.f3T6VW190602@virtual-voodoo.com> Subject: Re: Trimming old mailboxes Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 09:22:22 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by ns.internet.dk id f3T7LGe11343 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Got a question. This has to come up time and again. I have a small system > with about 500 users on it. A good number of them are people who leave > e-mail on the server rather than deleting it. > > As you can imagine over time these files have grown rather large. Is there > a program I can run that'll go through the mailboxes (they are all in > sendmail mailbox format) and delete any messages older than say 1 year? > I've discovered that I can tell the pop3 server to do this (sort of) but > would like to give everything a quick cleaning immediately to start fresh. > > Thoughts? > Use purgmbox. A search on google gave this with a link that works: - - - - According to Dmitry Valdov: > > А есть ли где пррограммка, удаляющая старые прочитанные письма из mailbox? > А то некоторые юзера любят почту забирать, оставляя ее на сервере :(( Cucipop это умеет сам делать. :-) А так - ftp://ftp.us.net/pub/unix/freebsd/purgmbox-1.0src.tgz - - - - Leif To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Apr 29 2:31: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail6.speakeasy.net (mail6.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.206]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2565737B43E for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 02:31:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drakFB@drak.com) Received: (qmail 75373 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2001 09:30:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.5?) ([64.81.163.89]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 29 Apr 2001 09:30:59 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: (Unverified) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 02:30:59 -0700 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: Andrew Matheson Subject: vnodes and jail Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm setting up a few virtual servers using jail (on a single disk system) and would like to prevent them from filling my primary or their shared file systems. It looks like I can limit their consumption using vnodes to give each one their own virtual disk. Is this a practical way of handling it, or is there a better solution? I'm new to vnodes, so I would also appreciate any insight into what performance degradation I should expect. Thank You, Andrew Matheson To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Apr 29 6:26: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ns.internet.dk (ns.internet.dk [194.19.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CBD37B422 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 06:26:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ns.internet.dk (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f3TDPwT93320 for freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG.AVP; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 15:25:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ns.internet.dk (8.11.2/8.11.2) with UUCP id f3TDPwk93314; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 15:25:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: from gina (gina.neland.dk [192.168.5.100] (may be forged)) by arnold.neland.dk (8.11.3/8.11.0) with SMTP id f3TDPhd99694; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 15:25:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Message-ID: <017701c0d0b0$193e2ae0$6405a8c0@neland.dk> From: "Leif Neland" To: , "Andrew Matheson" References: Subject: Re: vnodes and jail Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 15:27:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by ns.internet.dk id f3TDPwk93314 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > I'm setting up a few virtual servers using jail (on a single disk system) and would like to prevent them from filling my primary or their shared file systems. It looks like I can limit their consumption using vnodes to give each one their own virtual disk. Is this a practical way of handling it, or is there a better solution? I'm new to vnodes, so I would also appreciate any insight into what performance degradation I should expect. > You don't want to limit by vnodes, as you probably don't care how many files they have, just how many MB they have. You probably can use quota instead, as it (probably) doesn't matter if the users are jailed or not. Leif To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Apr 29 6:56:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ns.morning.ru (ns.morning.ru [195.161.98.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B70337B43C for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 06:56:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from subscr@morning.ru) Received: from NIC1 (cool-net.morning.ru [195.161.98.236]) by ns.morning.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA58513; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 21:59:37 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from subscr@morning.ru) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 21:59:12 +0700 From: Igor Podlesny X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.52 Beta/7) UNREG / CD5BF9353B3B7091 Organization: Morning Network X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <12485527191.20010429215912@morning.ru> To: "Leif Neland" Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re[2]: vnodes and jail In-Reply-To: <017701c0d0b0$193e2ae0$6405a8c0@neland.dk> References: <017701c0d0b0$193e2ae0$6405a8c0@neland.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >> I'm setting up a few virtual servers using jail (on a single disk >> system) and would like to prevent them from filling my primary or >> their shared file systems. It looks like I can limit their >> consumption using vnodes to give each one their own virtual disk. >> Is this a practical way of handling it, or is there a better >> solution? I do the same with vnodes... seems it's okay, and I'm quite sure it is safer than just quotas... if even root account gets compromised it still be okay :) >> I'm new to vnodes, so I would also appreciate any insight >> into what performance degradation I should expect. >> > You don't want to limit by vnodes, as you probably don't care how > many files they have, just how many MB they have. not i-nodes, vnodes instead (vnode pseudo disk devices -- vn(4))... > You probably can use quota instead, as it (probably) doesn't matter > if the users are jailed or not. > Leif > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message -- Igor mailto:subscr@morning.ru To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Apr 29 10:24:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ns.internet.dk (ns.internet.dk [194.19.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3470E37B50E for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 10:24:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ns.internet.dk (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f3THOa560189 for freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG.AVP; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 19:24:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ns.internet.dk (8.11.2/8.11.2) with UUCP id f3THOao60175; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 19:24:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: from gina (gina.neland.dk [192.168.5.100] (may be forged)) by arnold.neland.dk (8.11.3/8.11.0) with SMTP id f3THOPd02306; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 19:24:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Message-ID: <001501c0d0d1$6cc58480$6405a8c0@neland.dk> From: "Leif Neland" To: "Igor Podlesny" Cc: References: <017701c0d0b0$193e2ae0$6405a8c0@neland.dk> <12485527191.20010429215912@morning.ru> Subject: Re: Re[2]: vnodes and jail Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 19:25:43 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by ns.internet.dk id f3THOao60175 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > >> I'm new to vnodes, so I would also appreciate any insight > >> into what performance degradation I should expect. > >> > > > You don't want to limit by vnodes, as you probably don't care how > > many files they have, just how many MB they have. > > not i-nodes, vnodes instead (vnode pseudo disk devices -- vn(4))... > Sorry, It seems I didn't know what I was talking about. Live and learn... Leif To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Apr 29 11:39:57 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D48037B443 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 11:39:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from prometheus@gmx.ch) Received: (qmail 22552 invoked by uid 0); 29 Apr 2001 18:39:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO work.root.li) (62.2.99.33) by mail.gmx.net (mail01) with SMTP; 29 Apr 2001 18:39:53 -0000 Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 20:39:08 +0200 From: Prometheus X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.51) Educational Reply-To: Prometheus X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <193275497254.20010429203908@gmx.ch> To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Apache and namebased vhosts without specified IP? MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, I'm searching for a solution that would enable me to use name based vhosts without a specified IP on Apache 1.3.19. The reason for this is that I want to have the vhosts load balanceable without worrying which server needs which config file. Ideally, Apache should respond on all IPs which aren't used for IP based vhosts with the same stuff and just look at the HTTP header to determine what content it should deliver. I'd like to have something like ... Instead of the conventional ... Has anyone got any idea as how this could be done? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Apr 29 11:44: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from thor.ghim.org (thor.ghim.org [209.249.182.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F40937B440 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 11:44:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from schvin@schvin.net) Received: from electra (electra.nexus [192.168.2.128]) by thor.ghim.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id f3TIhts28540; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 18:43:55 GMT Received: by electra (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 29 Apr 2001 18:44:14 +0000 Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 18:44:14 +0000 From: George Lewis To: Prometheus Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Apache and namebased vhosts without specified IP? Message-ID: <20010429184414.B9409@schvin.net> References: <193275497254.20010429203908@gmx.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <193275497254.20010429203908@gmx.ch>; from prometheus@gmx.ch on Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 08:39:08PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Try this: NameVirtualHost * ... Hope that helps, George Prometheus (prometheus@gmx.ch) wrote: > Hello, > I'm searching for a solution that would enable me to use name based > vhosts without a specified IP on Apache 1.3.19. The reason for this is > that I want to have the vhosts load balanceable without worrying which server > needs which config file. Ideally, Apache should respond on all IPs > which aren't used for IP based vhosts with the same stuff and just > look at the HTTP header to determine what content it should deliver. > > I'd like to have something like > > ... > > > Instead of the conventional > > > ... > > > > > Has anyone got any idea as how this could be done? > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message -- George Lewis http://schvin.net/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Apr 29 11:47:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 518E337B424 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 11:47:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from prometheus@gmx.ch) Received: (qmail 1397 invoked by uid 0); 29 Apr 2001 18:47:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO work.root.li) (62.2.99.33) by mail.gmx.net (mp007-rz3) with SMTP; 29 Apr 2001 18:47:27 -0000 Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 20:46:42 +0200 From: Prometheus X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.51) Educational Reply-To: Prometheus X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <73275951557.20010429204642@gmx.ch> To: George Lewis Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: Apache and namebased vhosts without specified IP? In-Reply-To: <20010429184414.B9409@schvin.net> References: <193275497254.20010429203908@gmx.ch> <20010429184414.B9409@schvin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello George, Sunday, April 29, 2001, 8:44:14 PM, you wrote: GL> Try this: GL> NameVirtualHost * GL> GL> ... GL> GL> Hope that helps, Thanks! It did. I was messing around with this before but it appears as this won't work when there are still vhosts with specified IPs... -- Best regards, Prometheus mailto:prometheus@gmx.ch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Apr 29 15:24: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from inet03.citec.qld.gov.au (inet03.citec.qld.gov.au [203.5.10.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B908437B424 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 15:24:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgcccdc@citec.qld.gov.au) Received: by inet03.citec.qld.gov.au; id IAA29443; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 08:23:56 +1000 (EST) Received: from guru.citec.qld.gov.au( 147.132.22.88) by inet03.citec.qld.gov.au via smap (V2.0) id xma029084; Mon, 30 Apr 01 08:23:41 +1000 Received: from localhost (sgcccdc@localhost) by guru.citec.qld.gov.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA19798; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 08:23:40 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from sgcccdc@citec.qld.gov.au) X-Authentication-Warning: guru.citec.qld.gov.au: sgcccdc owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 08:23:39 +1000 (EST) From: Colin Campbell To: Rowan Crowe Cc: Subject: Re: "failsafe" NFS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, On Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Rowan Crowe wrote: > Hi all, > > I've just started reading up on, and playing with NFS. > > Is it possible to use multiple servers, like HD mirroring? For example a > passive second server quietly writes all changes to its local HD, but > ignores read requests - unless the first server is unresponsive. I don't believe so. AFAIK later versions of NFS allow you to specify multiple servers but the MUST be readonly. Syncing the servers is another problem. NFS won't do it for you. AT the risk of upsetting a few people, Linux has a couple of add-ons that p[rovide a "network block device". One pkg allows you to mirror a local disk with a remote disk, presenting the mirror as a device node (/dev/...). Another package provides a local device node that is actually a remote disk or partition or file (very flexible). Performance is supposed to be good on both of these. Much information is available on www.linux-ha.org. If only someone would do the same for *-bsd. Colin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Apr 29 19:23:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from out-mta3.plasa.com (out-mta3.plasa.com [202.134.0.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0EC37B43F for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 19:23:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from q2001@plasa.com) Received: out-mta3.plasa.com; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:17:14 +0700 Received: out-mta2.plasa.com; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:18:27 +0700 Received: from [192.168.19.58] (account ) by mail.plasa.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 3.4.4) with HTTP id 3003195 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:23:03 +0700 From: "q" Subject: Dial-In Service for ISP To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.3.4.4 Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:23:03 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Somebody can told me, where I can get documentation to setup Dial In Service for ISP ? I use Cyclom 32 YeP from Cyclades. Thank's Q ------------------------------------------------------------------ Email ini dikirim oleh PlasaCom : http://www.plasa.com Cepat di-download via TelkomNet Instan http://www.plasa.com/instan Rindukah Anda bertemu dengan ex teman-teman satu sekolah dulu ? Kunjungilah mereka (47.033 anggota) di KSI : http://ksi.plasa.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Apr 29 19:27: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from out-mta3.plasa.com (out-mta3.plasa.com [202.134.0.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF42437B423 for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 19:27:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from q2001@plasa.com) Received: out-mta3.plasa.com; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:21:09 +0700 Received: out-mta2.plasa.com; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:22:22 +0700 Received: from [192.168.19.58] (account ) by mail.plasa.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 3.4.4) with HTTP id 3003809 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:26:58 +0700 From: "q" Subject: Radius Server for Dial In Service To: isp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.3.4.4 Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:26:58 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Somebody could help me to setup Radius Server for dial in Service ?? May be you can point some URL's where I can get documentation to setup dial in service with Radius. Thank's Q ------------------------------------------------------------------ Email ini dikirim oleh PlasaCom : http://www.plasa.com Cepat di-download via TelkomNet Instan http://www.plasa.com/instan Rindukah Anda bertemu dengan ex teman-teman satu sekolah dulu ? Kunjungilah mereka (47.033 anggota) di KSI : http://ksi.plasa.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Apr 29 20:41:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from stox.sa.enteract.com (stox.sa.enteract.com [207.229.132.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD76D37B43E for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 20:41:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from stox@stox.sa.enteract.com) Received: (from stox@localhost) by stox.sa.enteract.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f3U3f6l00620; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 22:41:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from stox) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 22:41:05 -0500 (CDT) Organization: Imaginary Landscape, LLC. From: "Kenneth P. Stox" To: Colin Campbell Subject: Re: "failsafe" NFS Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 29-Apr-01 Colin Campbell wrote: > Another package provides a local > device node that is actually a remote disk or partition or file (very > flexible). Performance is supposed to be good on both of these. Much > information is available on www.linux-ha.org. If only someone would do the > same for *-bsd. Deja Vu! Sounds suspiciously like capabilities that AT&T's RFS had. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Apr 29 20:48:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.tcworks.net (mail.tcworks.net [216.61.218.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602B337B43E; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 20:48:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ccook@tcworks.net) Received: from tcworks.net (staind.tcworks.net [216.61.218.6]) by mail.tcworks.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f3U3e1005146; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 22:40:01 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <3AECE07C.53646B12@tcworks.net> Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 22:48:12 -0500 From: Chris Cook X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xiyuan qian Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ADSL ISDN ppp how to & IP counting References: <20010428063000.18797.qmail@web10003.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org xiyuan qian wrote: > > Hi, Can someone there do me a favour to tell me > whether freebsd supporting ADSL or ISDN ppp connecting > to an ISP? If can , how to ? Just like the > configuration of tel. line? ISDN would be handled just like a telephone line configuration, ADSL usually requires PPOE. You can find info on setting up FreeBSD with PPOE here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO_8859-1/books/handbook/pppoe.html > > If I can dial my freebsd box to my ISP, all I want to > do is make this box act like a gateway to let all my > local net going out. I know I can carry this out with > ipfilter. But I need to control the inner hosts like > the following situation: some can do everthing like > visiting web sites, sending email, ftping files etc, > some only can sending email. How to control with > ipfilter? Can the ipfilter log all the outgoing's > begin and end time? > Yes, you can do all this, here is a helpful url: http://packetstorm.securify.com/papers/firewall/FreeBSD+ipfilter.howto.htm -- Chris o----< ccook@tcworks.net >------------------------------------o |Chris Cook - Admin |TCWORKS.NET - http://www.tcworks.net | |The Computer Works ISP |FreeBSD - http://www.freebsd.org | o-------------------------------------------------------------o To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Apr 29 21:10:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from psknet.com (psknet.com [63.171.251.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 367F037B43E for ; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 21:10:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from troy@psknet.com) Received: (qmail 39235 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2001 04:10:10 -0000 Received: from abyss.dashit.net (HELO ABYSS) (63.171.251.250) by psknet.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2001 04:10:10 -0000 From: "Troy Settle" To: "q" , Subject: RE: Radius Server for Dial In Service Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 00:10:09 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal X-AntiVirus: scanned for viruses by Pulaski Networks (http://www.psknet.com) using AMaViS (http://www.amavis.org) Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org http://www.freeradius.org There's docs there on the upcoming FreeRadius and it's predecessor Cistron Radiusd. G'luck, -- Troy Settle Pulaski Networks 540.994.4254 ** -----Original Message----- ** From: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG ** [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of q ** Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 10:27 PM ** To: isp@freebsd.org ** Subject: Radius Server for Dial In Service ** ** ** Somebody could help me to setup Radius Server for dial in ** Service ?? ** May be you can point some URL's where I can get ** documentation to setup dial in service with Radius. ** Thank's ** ** Q ** ------------------------------------------------------------------ ** Email ini dikirim oleh PlasaCom : http://www.plasa.com ** Cepat di-download via TelkomNet Instan http://www.plasa.com/instan ** Rindukah Anda bertemu dengan ex teman-teman satu sekolah dulu ? ** Kunjungilah mereka (47.033 anggota) di KSI : http://ksi.plasa.com ** ------------------------------------------------------------------ ** ** ** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org ** with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message ** ** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Apr 30 5:49:34 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from out-mta3.plasa.com (out-mta3.plasa.com [202.134.0.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD23137B423 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 05:49:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from q2001@plasa.com) Received: out-mta3.plasa.com; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 19:43:37 +0700 Received: out-mta2.plasa.com; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 19:44:50 +0700 Received: from [192.168.19.58] (account ) by mail.plasa.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 3.4.4) with HTTP id 3166036 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 19:49:27 +0700 From: "q" Subject: cy0: port not found To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.3.4.4 Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 19:49:27 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi There, I need your advise about Cyclom 32 YeP driver instalation at FreeBSD 4.3. Add options and device (CY_PCI_FASTINTR & cy0) when my kernel finished to compile, when I restart with new kernel, it reported : cy0: port not found What it's mean ??? What should I do ??? Thanks anyway for your advise. Regards, Q ------------------------------------------------------------------ Email ini dikirim oleh PlasaCom : http://www.plasa.com Cepat di-download via TelkomNet Instan http://www.plasa.com/instan Rindukah Anda bertemu dengan ex teman-teman satu sekolah dulu ? Kunjungilah mereka (47.033 anggota) di KSI : http://ksi.plasa.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Apr 30 12:50: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from virtual-voodoo.com (virtual-voodoo.com [204.120.165.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFFDF37B423 for ; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 12:50:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from steve@virtual-voodoo.com) Received: from ny1wsh031 (blackhole.cioe.com [204.120.165.44]) (authenticated) by virtual-voodoo.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f3UJntD60818; Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:49:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from steve@virtual-voodoo.com) Message-ID: <01ac01c0d1ae$b66b3d90$8a1a050a@winstar.com> From: "Steven E. Ames" To: "Robert Hough" Cc: References: <200104290631.f3T6VW190602@virtual-voodoo.com> <20010429115647.A48553@solveinteractive.com> Subject: Re: Trimming old mailboxes Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:49:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thank you. Just the ticket. -Steve ----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert Hough" To: "Steve Ames" Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 10:56 AM Subject: Re: Trimming old mailboxes > On Sun, Apr 29, 2001, Steve Ames wrote: > > > > As you can imagine over time these files have grown rather large. Is there > > a program I can run that'll go through the mailboxes (they are all in > > sendmail mailbox format) and delete any messages older than say 1 year? > > http://www.westnet.com/providers/expire_mail.pl.gz > > What's nice about this is, you can drop the user a note telling them what messages got purged, and > why. If I recall, been awhile since I've used it though. > > -- > Robert Hough (rch@solveinteractive.com) > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue May 1 8:48:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from lcmail2.lc.ca.gov (lcmail2.lc.ca.gov [165.107.12.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25A737B422 for ; Tue, 1 May 2001 08:48:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Drew.Tomlinson@lc.ca.gov) Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON by lcmail2.lc.ca.gov (PMDF V5.2-27 #40821) id <0GCN00M01YGMJS@lcmail2.lc.ca.gov> for freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 1 May 2001 08:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ldcmsx01.lc.ca.gov ([165.107.11.191]) by lcmail2.lc.ca.gov (PMDF V5.2-27 #40821) with ESMTP id <0GCN00450YDYDD@lcmail2.lc.ca.gov> for freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 01 May 2001 08:44:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ldcmsx01.lc.ca.gov with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id <2QAS5AHH>; Tue, 01 May 2001 08:44:08 -0700 Content-return: allowed Date: Tue, 01 May 2001 08:43:59 -0700 From: "Tomlinson, Drew" Subject: RE: Apache and namebased vhosts without specified IP? To: 'George Lewis' , 'Prometheus' Cc: "'freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG'" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-type: MULTIPART/ALTERNATIVE; BOUNDARY="Boundary_(ID_peLOlWo7Xeb3NOo6/3jAvg)" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --Boundary_(ID_peLOlWo7Xeb3NOo6/3jAvg) Content-type: text/plain I just happen to have that web page open. Look here: http://httpd.apache.org/docs/vhosts/name-based.html HTH, Drew > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of George Lewis > Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 11:44 AM > To: Prometheus > Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: Apache and namebased vhosts without specified IP? > > > Try this: > > NameVirtualHost * > > > ... > > > Hope that helps, > > George > > Prometheus (prometheus@gmx.ch) wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm searching for a solution that would enable me to use name based > > vhosts without a specified IP on Apache 1.3.19. The reason > for this is > > that I want to have the vhosts load balanceable without > worrying which server > > needs which config file. Ideally, Apache should respond on all IPs > > which aren't used for IP based vhosts with the same stuff and just > > look at the HTTP header to determine what content it should deliver. > > > > I'd like to have something like > > > > ... > > > > > > Instead of the conventional > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > Has anyone got any idea as how this could be done? > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > -- > George Lewis > http://schvin.net/ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > --Boundary_(ID_peLOlWo7Xeb3NOo6/3jAvg) Content-type: text/html Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable RE: Apache and namebased vhosts without specified IP?

I just happen to have that web page open.  Look = here:

http://httpd.apache.org/docs/vhosts/name-based.html

HTH,

Drew

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
> [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@F= reeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of George Lewis
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 11:44 AM
> To: Prometheus
> Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Re: Apache and namebased vhosts = without specified IP?
>
>
> Try this:
>
>       NameVirtualHost = *
>
>       <VirtualHost = *>
>       =         ...
>       = </VirtualHost>
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> George
>
> Prometheus (prometheus@gmx.ch) wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I'm searching for a solution that would = enable me to use name based
> > vhosts without a specified IP on Apache = 1.3.19. The reason
> for this is
> > that I want to have the vhosts load = balanceable without
> worrying which server
> > needs which config file. Ideally, Apache = should respond on all IPs
> > which aren't used for IP based vhosts with = the same stuff and just
> > look at the HTTP header to determine what = content it should deliver.
> >
> > I'd like to have something like
> > <VirtualHost>
> > ...
> > </VirtualHost>
> >
> > Instead of the conventional
> >
> > <VirtualHost xxx.yyy.zzz.www>
> > ...
> > </VirtualHost>
> >
> >
> >
> > Has anyone got any idea as how this could = be done?
> >
> >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to = majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" = in the body of the message
>
> --
> George Lewis
> http://schvin.net/
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to = majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the = body of the message
>

--Boundary_(ID_peLOlWo7Xeb3NOo6/3jAvg)-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue May 1 15:42: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from out-mta3.plasa.com (out-mta3.plasa.com [202.134.0.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE4737B422 for ; Tue, 1 May 2001 15:42:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from q2001@plasa.com) Received: out-mta3.plasa.com; Wed, 02 May 2001 05:36:06 +0700 Received: out-mta2.plasa.com; Wed, 02 May 2001 05:37:19 +0700 Received: from [192.168.19.55] (account ) by mail.plasa.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 3.4.4) with HTTP id 3516044 for ; Wed, 02 May 2001 05:41:58 +0700 From: "q" Subject: cy0: port not found To: isp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.3.4.4 Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 05:41:58 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org What it's mean ??? What I should do ??? Thank's. Q ------------------------------------------------------------------ Email ini dikirim oleh PlasaCom : http://www.plasa.com Cepat di-download via TelkomNet Instan http://www.plasa.com/instan Rindukah Anda bertemu dengan ex teman-teman satu sekolah dulu ? Kunjungilah mereka (47.033 anggota) di KSI : http://ksi.plasa.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue May 1 15:43:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from out-mta3.plasa.com (out-mta3.plasa.com [202.134.0.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B105937B424 for ; Tue, 1 May 2001 15:43:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from q2001@plasa.com) Received: out-mta3.plasa.com; Wed, 02 May 2001 05:37:44 +0700 Received: out-mta2.plasa.com; Wed, 02 May 2001 05:38:57 +0700 Received: from [192.168.19.55] (account ) by mail.plasa.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 3.4.4) with HTTP id 3516224 for ; Wed, 02 May 2001 05:43:36 +0700 From: "q" Subject: cy0: port not found To: isp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.3.4.4 Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 05:43:36 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I use Cycladed Cyclom 32YeP (PCI) at FreeBSD 4.3. I was added driver line at kernel options, recompile, rebooting, and found that message. What it's mean ??? What I should do ??? Thank's. Q ------------------------------------------------------------------ Email ini dikirim oleh PlasaCom : http://www.plasa.com Cepat di-download via TelkomNet Instan http://www.plasa.com/instan Rindukah Anda bertemu dengan ex teman-teman satu sekolah dulu ? Kunjungilah mereka (47.033 anggota) di KSI : http://ksi.plasa.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed May 2 4: 2:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ady.warpnet.ro (ady.warpnet.ro [194.102.224.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4443B37B422; Wed, 2 May 2001 04:02:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ady@warpnet.ro) Received: from localhost (ady@localhost) by ady.warpnet.ro (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA00700; Wed, 2 May 2001 14:06:06 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ady@warpnet.ro) Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 14:06:06 +0300 (EEST) From: Adrian Penisoara To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Automating flood filtering Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I am interested in some way of automating the process of detecting and installing firewall filters for the various kinds of floods undergoing in today's (net)world. Is there any project or package targeted at this ? Thanks & regards, Ady (@warpnet.ro) __________________________________________________________________ | "Be vewy vewy quiet, I'm hunting wuntime ewwors!" - Elmer Fudd | To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed May 2 4:33:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ady.warpnet.ro (ady.warpnet.ro [194.102.224.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B532E37B440 for ; Wed, 2 May 2001 04:33:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ady@warpnet.ro) Received: from localhost (ady@localhost) by ady.warpnet.ro (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA02570; Wed, 2 May 2001 14:36:21 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ady@warpnet.ro) Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 14:36:20 +0300 (EEST) From: Adrian Penisoara To: q Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cy0: port not found In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I'm using a Cyclades Cyclom YeP PCI board (and a Ye ISA board too) and it's working fine. You should have attached your kernel configuration file. It should have looked like this: device cy options CY_PCI_FASTINTR If you have any other parameters on the device line (like "at isa? port ?) you should remove them, they are used only for the ISA card model. Also make sure your cables are properly connected. You should test the board with a DOS bootdisk[*] and the cytest tool found on the floppy disk that came with the board (or you can download it from the Cyclades FTP site). [*] Be carefull about booting DOS on a system with FreeBSD installed in a "dangerously dedicated" slice; DOS has the stupid behaviour of reconstructing the partition table thus overwriting the first sectors of your FreeBSD slic. PS: please do not repost and keep your number of posted messages short, there are many people subscribed to this list. RGDs, Ady (@warpnet.ro) __________________________________________________________________ | "Be vewy vewy quiet, I'm hunting wuntime ewwors!" - Elmer Fudd | On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, q wrote: > Hi There, > I need your advise about Cyclom 32 YeP driver instalation at > FreeBSD 4.3. Add options and device (CY_PCI_FASTINTR & cy0) > when my kernel finished to compile, when I restart with new > kernel, it reported : > > cy0: port not found > > What it's mean ??? > What should I do ??? > Thanks anyway for your advise. > > Regards, > > Q > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Email ini dikirim oleh PlasaCom : http://www.plasa.com > Cepat di-download via TelkomNet Instan http://www.plasa.com/instan > Rindukah Anda bertemu dengan ex teman-teman satu sekolah dulu ? > Kunjungilah mereka (47.033 anggota) di KSI : http://ksi.plasa.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed May 2 6:45:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.kka.com (smtp.kka.com [63.141.65.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69FF737B424 for ; Wed, 2 May 2001 06:45:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Eric_Stanfield@kenokozie.com) Subject: server getting bogus route info from ??? To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.2a November 23, 1999 Message-ID: From: Eric_Stanfield@kenokozie.com Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 08:44:19 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on Notes1st/Keno(Release 5.0.4 |June 8, 2000) at 05/02/2001 08:44:35 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I have a machine set up to run some apps like mrtg and netsaint. This machine monitors a corporate wan with 4 offices in the US. washington d.c. 10.1.0.0/16 chicago 10.2.0.0/16 (netsaint is here) boston 10.3.0.0/16 portland 10.4.0.0/16 Netsaint is configured to page me if it can no longer connect to the wan router on one of these networks. Each lan has it's own internet connection and a separate router that handles internet traffic. The problem that is coming up occasionally is that netsaint pages me saying it can no longer see the boston wan router at 10.3.1.2. Yet, when I telnet into the netsaint box and do a traceroute the traffic is trying to exit the chicago internet router instead of going through the chicago wan router and into the frame. If I telnet into the Chicago wan router, I can ping the boston wan router successfuly so the Chicago wan router does have the proper route info. I have tried to tell the netsaint box not to accept icmp redirects thinking that maybe the link to boston really is going down for a minute and the chicago wan router is sending redirects for that route to the internet router. I actually thought this might have solved the problem, but this morning after a few weeks of peace and quiet the same situation has cropped up again. Route table on the netsaint box is not showing a new route to boston, it always looks like this (which is correct): Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 10.2.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 10.3.0.0 10.2.1.2 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 10.1.0.0 10.2.1.2 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 10.4.0.0 10.2.1.2 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 127.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 U 0 0 0 lo 0.0.0.0 10.2.1.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 10.2.1.2 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 Actual ip's of the wan routers are: 10.1.1.2 = washington 10.2.1.2 = chicago 10.3.1.2 = boston 10.4.1.2 = portland This ONLY happens with the boston route. The netsaint box isn't set up to receive rip info (and there shouldn't be any being sent into the lan anyways). I'm at a total loss. Rebooting the machine is the only thing that clears this up. Anyone have an idea? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Eric Stanfield, K2Access Keno Kozie Associates 222 N LaSalle #1500 Chicago, IL 60606 (312) 332-3000 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed May 2 18:54:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from hpu450.hpu.edu (hpu450.hpu.edu [198.199.136.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE23A37B43C; Wed, 2 May 2001 18:54:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from waichan@hpu.edu) Received: from sniffit (sniffit.nt.hpu.edu [10.2.1.7]) by hpu450.hpu.edu (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA12600; Wed, 2 May 2001 15:54:03 -1000 (HST) From: "Wai Chan" To: , Subject: load balance on 2 ISPs Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 15:54:02 -1000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00AD_01C0D320.1C066810" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00AD_01C0D320.1C066810 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, My FreeBSD 4.3R box is the Squid web cache server (wccp caching server). I would like to load balance the http traffic on ISP A and ISP B. Is there any FreeBSD based solution to achieve such load balancing (round robin is fine)? Is there anyone successfully tried this? I would appreciate it if someone could contribute a sample configuration or guide. |-- ip: 12.12.12.12 --| | | |---------| | |--------| | FreeBSD | |--| Cisco |--(ISP A)--| | 4.3R | | WCCP | |--Internet |---------| |--| router |--(ISP B)--| | | |--------| |-- ip: 23.23.23.23 --| Thanks! best wishes, Wai Chan ------=_NextPart_000_00AD_01C0D320.1C066810 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="winmail.dat" eJ8+IgIBAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5AQAAAAAAADoAAEIgAcAGAAAAElQTS5NaWNy b3NvZnQgTWFpbC5Ob3RlADEIAQ2ABAACAAAAAgACAAEGgAMADgAAANEHBQACAA8ANQAAAAMAJgEB A5AGAEQGAAAiAAAACwACAAEAAAALACMAAAAAAAMAJgAAAAAACwApAAAAAAADADYAAAAAAB4AcAAB AAAAFwAAAGxvYWQgYmFsYW5jZSBvbiAyIElTUHMAAAIBcQABAAAAFgAAAAHA03PpuOWXUKAyZ0uJ gUjTfDXwYNAAAAIBHQwBAAAAFQAAAFNNVFA6V0FJQ0hBTkBIUFUuRURVAAAAAAsAAQ4AAAAAQAAG DgAmNchz08ABAgEKDgEAAAAYAAAAAAAAAKHsE7V2vr1JpgNWQK3ureXCgAAACwAfDgEAAAACAQkQ AQAAAFYCAABSAgAAGAQAAExaRnUVjYTzAwAKAHJjcGcxMjUWMgD4C2BuDhAwMzNPAfcCpARkAgBj aArAc/BldDAgCFUHsgKDAFBjA9QQ2VRhaANxAoB9swqACMggOwlvDiA4AoAlCoF2CJB3awuAZDQd DGBjAFALAwu1IEhpciAHQGwsCqIKhAqATQh5IEYJ0UJTRCAgNC4zUiAG4HggIQQAIHRoZQYAcXUA aWQgd2ViIGMnANAbEREwcnYR0Sh3LmMN8BvTC4BnHDUpLlggIEkbkAhgbBuAbCRpaxsgdG8eoG9h bRuAYgdAAHBjHuEbEWhjAkAc8HRyYQEgDeAgwwIgHiBTUCBBGIAXEP0hM0IeAhrjCXAhkRmoH4CL ETAbgHMG8HV0aSERux8BHSJlHHAcMBdQaB8qtR1SKANgdSGxA2BiC4DDGsIg0G5lKT8iTAIg1yUz H9AEEGYecGwZoCCQPwiQG4AbAAQAJ+IeRWFwpnAJcCZAYXQbIGkFQP8GkCQBB4Ao0gWgHnIFoAIw nQUQYiRAItEcMGFtC1D1LKJuINBnCHAroCRiBbFzLrAbcGUuGNoeEDCVfEQtLRrAcDogDiAu9TGm IDEwfDA+MJcz2jKH/zEhNYUzjzNjNXc06Bm3Nh+7MQM5MEMEAAWgMQMoIUMeKTfrGjQzbzMXV0ND 9yFgPPwxIUkCMASREUA0/982Dzo2JqFAETsXQju6Mx/HNo83njC9MjMuSOYyWIUY1FQRAG5rcyEY 2l5iB5AFQAPxGxBzGMVX/wtwEXBKoQjQEnIXcwqAFDECAE5wAAALAAGACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAA RgAAAAADhQAAAAAAAAMAA4AIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAABCFAAAAAAAAAwAHgAggBgAAAAAA wAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAUoUAAPlvAQAeAAmACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAABUhQAAAQAAAAQAAAA5 LjAACwANgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAgoUAAAEAAAALADqACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAA AAAOhQAAAAAAAAMAPIAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAABGFAAAAAAAAAwA9gAggBgAAAAAAwAAA AAAAAEYAAAAAGIUAAAAAAAALAFKACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAAGhQAAAAAAAAMAU4AIIAYA AAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAAGFAAAAAAAAAgH4DwEAAAAQAAAAoewTtXa+vUmmA1ZAre6t5QIB+g8B AAAAEAAAAKHsE7V2vr1JpgNWQK3ureUCAfsPAQAAAJkAAAAAAAAAOKG7EAXlEBqhuwgAKypWwgAA UFNUUFJYLkRMTAAAAAAAAAAATklUQfm/uAEAqgA32W4AAABDOlxEb2N1bWVudHMgYW5kIFNldHRp bmdzXHdhaWNoYW5cTG9jYWwgU2V0dGluZ3NcQXBwbGljYXRpb24gRGF0YVxNaWNyb3NvZnRcT3V0 bG9va1xvdXRsb29rLnBzdAAAAAADAP4PBQAAAAMADTT9NwAAAgF/AAEAAAAvAAAAPExORUpLR0FE UEhLTUxPRkxOTEZMQUVCSEZBQUEud2FpY2hhbkBocHUuZWR1PgAAAwAGEIbATHkDAAcQuAEAAAMA EBAAAAAAAwAREAAAAAAeAAgQAQAAAGUAAABISUFMTCxNWUZSRUVCU0Q0M1JCT1hJU1RIRVNRVUlE V0VCQ0FDSEVTRVJWRVIoV0NDUENBQ0hJTkdTRVJWRVIpSVdPVUxETElLRVRPTE9BREJBTEFOQ0VU SEVIVFRQVFJBRkZJAAAAAFVz ------=_NextPart_000_00AD_01C0D320.1C066810-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu May 3 14:12:26 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from digitaldaemon.com (digitaldaemon.com [63.105.9.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 69F0B37B423 for ; Thu, 3 May 2001 14:12:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jan@digitaldaemon.com) Received: (qmail 1985 invoked from network); 3 May 2001 21:11:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitaldaemon.com) (192.168.0.73) by digitaldaemon.com with SMTP; 3 May 2001 21:11:09 -0000 Message-ID: <3AF1C95A.7000405@digitaldaemon.com> Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 17:10:50 -0400 From: Jan Knepper User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010131 Netscape6/6.01 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-ISP@freebsd.org Subject: 2 Net Blocks' on 1 Interface. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi! I guess I need help from an expert again... I've got a net block 63.105.9.32/27 which has been setup and works fine as far as I know. I recently got an other net block 65.204.18.128/25 which is supposed to run over the same interface. Now I have added the aliases, but for some reason a traceroute from outside to 65.204.18.129 for instance causes the packet to bounce between the backbone provider and the internal interface as it seems. Could anyone shed any light on what is wrong? Thanks! Jan Tracing route to 65.204.18.129 over a maximum of 30 hops 1 260 ms 260 ms 271 ms dal-qbu-zoy-vty254.as.wcom.net [216.192.252.254 2 261 ms 260 ms 271 ms dal-big2-eth01.wan.wcom.net [206.175.224.65] 3 281 ms 290 ms 250 ms dal-ppp2-fas2-0-0.wan.wcom.net [206.175.225.5] 4 260 ms 271 ms 270 ms dal-peer1-fas0-1-0.wan.wcom.net [205.156.211.24 ] 5 250 ms 280 ms 281 ms Serial5-4.GW2.DFW7.ALTER.NET [157.130.145.165] 6 251 ms 260 ms 281 ms 129.at-6-0-0.XR1.DFW9.ALTER.NET [152.63.100.26] 7 251 ms 260 ms 270 ms 0.so-3-0-0.TR1.DFW9.ALTER.NET [152.63.10.13] 8 310 ms 301 ms 300 ms 128.at-5-1-0.TR1.NYC8.ALTER.NET [152.63.3.213] 9 300 ms 341 ms 350 ms 185.ATM6-0.XR1.NYC1.ALTER.NET [152.63.21.25] 10 330 ms 351 ms 350 ms 195.ATM8-0-0.GW1.BUF1.ALTER.NET [152.63.16.105] 11 340 ms 351 ms 350 ms uunet-t1.digitaldaemon.com [63.105.9.33] 12 341 ms 350 ms 371 ms 195.ATM8-0-0.GW1.BUF1.ALTER.NET [152.63.16.105] 13 360 ms 351 ms 380 ms uunet-t1.digitaldaemon.com [63.105.9.33] 14 341 ms 350 ms 371 ms 191.ATM9-0-0.GW1.BUF1.ALTER.NET [152.63.16.113] 15 391 ms 390 ms 361 ms uunet-t1.digitaldaemon.com [63.105.9.33] 16 390 ms 361 ms 401 ms 194.ATM9-0-0.GW1.BUF1.ALTER.NET [152.63.16.109] 17 380 ms 401 ms 411 ms uunet-t1.digitaldaemon.com [63.105.9.33] 18 411 ms 391 ms 410 ms 190.ATM8-0-0.GW1.BUF1.ALTER.NET [152.63.16.117] 19 400 ms 441 ms 410 ms uunet-t1.digitaldaemon.com [63.105.9.33] 20 391 ms 450 ms 421 ms 195.ATM8-0-0.GW1.BUF1.ALTER.NET [152.63.16.105] 21 410 ms 441 ms 431 ms uunet-t1.digitaldaemon.com [63.105.9.33] 22 440 ms 421 ms 470 ms 191.ATM9-0-0.GW1.BUF1.ALTER.NET [152.63.16.113] 23 431 ms 441 ms 480 ms uunet-t1.digitaldaemon.com [63.105.9.33] 24 451 ms 500 ms 461 ms 194.ATM9-0-0.GW1.BUF1.ALTER.NET [152.63.16.109] 25 460 ms 461 ms 461 ms uunet-t1.digitaldaemon.com [63.105.9.33] 26 440 ms 441 ms 450 ms 190.ATM8-0-0.GW1.BUF1.ALTER.NET [152.63.16.117] 27 451 ms 471 ms 450 ms uunet-t1.digitaldaemon.com [63.105.9.33] 28 441 ms 460 ms 481 ms 195.ATM8-0-0.GW1.BUF1.ALTER.NET [152.63.16.105] 29 460 ms 481 ms 461 ms uunet-t1.digitaldaemon.com [63.105.9.33] 30 470 ms 501 ms 511 ms 191.ATM9-0-0.GW1.BUF1.ALTER.NET [152.63.16.113] Trace complete. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu May 3 14:16: 2 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from cody.jharris.com (cody.jharris.com [205.238.128.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A66337B424 for ; Thu, 3 May 2001 14:15:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nick@rogness.net) Received: from localhost (nick@localhost) by cody.jharris.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f43MQQn15159; Thu, 3 May 2001 17:26:26 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nick@rogness.net) Date: Thu, 3 May 2001 17:26:25 -0500 (CDT) From: Nick Rogness X-Sender: nick@cody.jharris.com To: Jan Knepper Cc: FreeBSD-ISP@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2 Net Blocks' on 1 Interface. In-Reply-To: <3AF1C95A.7000405@digitaldaemon.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 3 May 2001, Jan Knepper wrote: > I've got a net block 63.105.9.32/27 which has been setup and works > fine as far as I know. I recently got an other net block > 65.204.18.128/25 which is supposed to run over the same interface. Now > I have added the aliases, but for some reason a traceroute from > outside to 65.204.18.129 for instance causes the packet to bounce > between the backbone provider and the internal interface as it seems. > > Could anyone shed any light on what is wrong? How did you add the alias? What does your ifconfig output look like? What does your routing table look like? > Nick Rogness - Keep on Routing in a Free World... "FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu May 3 14:25: 5 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from digitaldaemon.com (digitaldaemon.com [63.105.9.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4E8D037B422 for ; Thu, 3 May 2001 14:24:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jan@digitaldaemon.com) Received: (qmail 2679 invoked from network); 3 May 2001 21:23:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO digitaldaemon.com) (192.168.0.73) by digitaldaemon.com with SMTP; 3 May 2001 21:23:47 -0000 Message-ID: <3AF1CC50.1020307@digitaldaemon.com> Date: Thu, 03 May 2001 17:23:28 -0400 From: Jan Knepper User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; m18) Gecko/20010131 Netscape6/6.01 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-ISP@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Nick Rogness Subject: Re: 2 Net Blocks' on 1 Interface. References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000509060800090702060106" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --------------000509060800090702060106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit # ifconfig -a xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 63.105.9.34 netmask 0xffffffe0 broadcast 63.105.9.63 inet6 fe80::201:2ff:fe65:1441%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 63.105.9.35 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.35 inet 63.105.9.36 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.36 inet 63.105.9.37 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.37 inet 63.105.9.38 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.38 inet 63.105.9.39 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.39 inet 63.105.9.40 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.40 inet 63.105.9.41 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.41 inet 63.105.9.42 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.42 inet 63.105.9.43 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.43 inet 63.105.9.44 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.44 inet 63.105.9.45 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.45 inet 63.105.9.46 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.46 inet 63.105.9.47 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.47 inet 63.105.9.48 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.48 inet 63.105.9.49 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.49 inet 63.105.9.50 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.50 inet 63.105.9.51 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.51 inet 63.105.9.52 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.52 inet 63.105.9.53 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.53 inet 63.105.9.54 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.54 inet 63.105.9.55 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.55 inet 63.105.9.56 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.56 inet 63.105.9.57 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.57 inet 63.105.9.58 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.58 inet 63.105.9.59 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.59 inet 63.105.9.60 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.60 inet 63.105.9.61 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.61 inet 63.105.9.62 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.62 inet 65.204.18.129 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast 65.204.18.255 inet 65.204.18.130 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.130 inet 65.204.18.131 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.131 inet 65.204.18.132 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.132 inet 65.204.18.133 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.133 inet 65.204.18.134 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.134 inet 65.204.18.135 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.135 inet 65.204.18.136 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.136 inet 65.204.18.137 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.137 inet 65.204.18.138 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.138 inet 65.204.18.139 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.139 ether 00:01:02:65:14:41 media: autoselect (100baseTX) status: active supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP 100baseTX xl1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.0.60 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 inet6 fe80::2b0:d0ff:fe23:88d5%xl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet 192.168.0.61 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.0.61 ether 00:b0:d0:23:88:d5 media: autoselect (100baseTX) status: active supported media: autoselect 100baseTX 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP 10baseT/UTP 100baseTX lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 ppp0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 sl0: flags=c010 mtu 552 faith0: flags=8000 mtu 1500 gif0: flags=8010 mtu 1280 gif1: flags=8010 mtu 1280 gif2: flags=8010 mtu 1280 gif3: flags=8010 mtu 1280 Nick Rogness wrote: > On Thu, 3 May 2001, Jan Knepper wrote: > >> I've got a net block 63.105.9.32/27 which has been setup and works >> fine as far as I know. I recently got an other net block >> 65.204.18.128/25 which is supposed to run over the same interface. Now >> I have added the aliases, but for some reason a traceroute from >> outside to 65.204.18.129 for instance causes the packet to bounce >> between the backbone provider and the internal interface as it seems. >> >> Could anyone shed any light on what is wrong? > > > How did you add the alias? What does your ifconfig output > look like? What does your routing table look like? > > > > Nick Rogness > - Keep on Routing in a Free World... > "FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!" > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > > --------------000509060800090702060106 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit # ifconfig -a
xl0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
       inet 63.105.9.34 netmask 0xffffffe0 broadcast 63.105.9.63
       inet6 fe80::201:2ff:fe65:1441%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
       inet 63.105.9.35 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.35
       inet 63.105.9.36 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.36
       inet 63.105.9.37 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.37
       inet 63.105.9.38 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.38
       inet 63.105.9.39 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.39
       inet 63.105.9.40 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.40
       inet 63.105.9.41 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.41
       inet 63.105.9.42 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.42
       inet 63.105.9.43 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.43
       inet 63.105.9.44 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.44
       inet 63.105.9.45 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.45
       inet 63.105.9.46 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.46
       inet 63.105.9.47 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.47
       inet 63.105.9.48 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.48
       inet 63.105.9.49 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.49
       inet 63.105.9.50 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.50
       inet 63.105.9.51 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.51
       inet 63.105.9.52 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.52
       inet 63.105.9.53 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.53
       inet 63.105.9.54 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.54
       inet 63.105.9.55 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.55
       inet 63.105.9.56 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.56
       inet 63.105.9.57 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.57
       inet 63.105.9.58 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.58
       inet 63.105.9.59 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.59
       inet 63.105.9.60 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.60
       inet 63.105.9.61 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.61
       inet 63.105.9.62 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 63.105.9.62
       inet 65.204.18.129 netmask 0xffffff80 broadcast 65.204.18.255
       inet 65.204.18.130 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.130
       inet 65.204.18.131 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.131
       inet 65.204.18.132 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.132
       inet 65.204.18.133 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.133
       inet 65.204.18.134 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.134
       inet 65.204.18.135 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.135
       inet 65.204.18.136 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.136
       inet 65.204.18.137 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.137
       inet 65.204.18.138 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.138
       inet 65.204.18.139 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 65.204.18.139
       ether 00:01:02:65:14:41
       media: autoselect (100baseTX) status: active
       supported media: autoselect 100baseTX <full-duplex> 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 10baseT/UTP 100baseTX <hw-loopback>
xl1: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
       inet 192.168.0.60 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
       inet6 fe80::2b0:d0ff:fe23:88d5%xl1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2
       inet 192.168.0.61 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.0.61
       ether 00:b0:d0:23:88:d5
       media: autoselect (100baseTX) status: active
       supported media: autoselect 100baseTX <full-duplex> 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 10baseT/UTP 100baseTX <hw-loopback>
lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384
       inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3
       inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
       inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
ppp0: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
sl0: flags=c010<POINTOPOINT,LINK2,MULTICAST> mtu 552
faith0: flags=8000<MULTICAST> mtu 1500
gif0: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1280
gif1: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1280
gif2: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1280
gif3: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1280



Nick Rogness wrote:
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Jan Knepper wrote:

I've got a net block 63.105.9.32/27 which has been setup and works
fine as far as I know. I recently got an other net block
65.204.18.128/25 which is supposed to run over the same interface. Now
I have added the aliases, but for some reason a traceroute from
outside to 65.204.18.129 for instance causes the packet to bounce
between the backbone provider and the internal interface as it seems.

Could anyone shed any light on what is wrong?

	How did you add the alias?  What does your ifconfig output
	look like?  What does your routing table look like?



Nick Rogness <nick@rogness.net>
 - Keep on Routing in a Free World...
  "FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!"


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




--------------000509060800090702060106-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu May 3 22:38:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from keep.scn.ru (SCN-SibInet.sibinet.ru [213.24.217.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D7037B423 for ; Thu, 3 May 2001 22:38:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from alx@scn.ru) Received: from scn.ru (alx.sc.ten [10.0.7.13]) by keep.scn.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA81618 for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 13:39:17 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from alx@scn.ru) Message-ID: <3AF24E2D.CF9F41D9@scn.ru> Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 13:37:33 +0700 From: "Alex N. Zhuravlev" Organization: SCT X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: ru,en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: IP statically linked to MAC address Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------msF3182803C47209B2D56F5ABF" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------msF3182803C47209B2D56F5ABF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi ! Are there any ways to limit such situation: We've got some clients physically connected to !stupid! ethernet hub ( I mean no VLAN, etc.). The links to them are PPP, not real, but limited by routing options, firewall. The problem is that some client can configure his interface with IP address from another client (making him good amount of traffic). Can we limit this situation by providing access and ability to work for some IP address only if it has predefined MAC address ? Thanks, Alex N. Zhuravlev. --------------msF3182803C47209B2D56F5ABF Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIIHzAYJKoZIhvcNAQcCoIIHvTCCB7kCAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMAsGCSqGSIb3DQEHAaCC BZ8wggJuMIIB16ADAgECAgMEBK4wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwgZIxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUw EwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQBgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEPMA0GA1UEChMGVGhh d3RlMR0wGwYDVQQLExRDZXJ0aWZpY2F0ZSBTZXJ2aWNlczEoMCYGA1UEAxMfUGVyc29uYWwg RnJlZW1haWwgUlNBIDIwMDAuOC4zMDAeFw0wMTAxMjIwNTMwMjJaFw0wMjAxMjIwNTMwMjJa MDwxHzAdBgNVBAMTFlRoYXd0ZSBGcmVlbWFpbCBNZW1iZXIxGTAXBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWCmFs eEBzY24ucnUwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGBAL6xOQ+P7j3NLmm36pC8vpZv lyKct+zmoLfBoEEreyfHlEw8e1rZgzL6Tj5rFGeFoZLmEhZUMRsXimFh321hKwcrwlS9bu0g yO30t4shvV7I59RnYY9OLSlZ3CN9k1s/xWTWhoYZKYP7Bg51t/9SLhNpH0R/45Wn3kCHFN63 rQhhAgMBAAGjJzAlMBUGA1UdEQQOMAyBCmFseEBzY24ucnUwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADANBgkq hkiG9w0BAQQFAAOBgQByXaoPC3ReT0nne6u81fWiTrnhHgenOwlOwfIfe8GbGAnkewRl++4j NAC6qPO8IjUMy6Tx2g4IYs20xaBuds4w9X4maQLwZIcehpyJxytafxl/9nH6Am7OWSoKeVxg u+8IT7jTj/XJWA9vrE/x3mi4Jo5IPgWLLiv4ymuvMeG1hjCCAykwggKSoAMCAQICAQwwDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwgdExCzAJBgNVBAYTAlpBMRUwEwYDVQQIEwxXZXN0ZXJuIENhcGUxEjAQ BgNVBAcTCUNhcGUgVG93bjEaMBgGA1UEChMRVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcxKDAmBgNVBAsT H0NlcnRpZmljYXRpb24gU2VydmljZXMgRGl2aXNpb24xJDAiBgNVBAMTG1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJz b25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBDQTErMCkGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYccGVyc29uYWwtZnJlZW1haWxAdGhh d3RlLmNvbTAeFw0wMDA4MzAwMDAwMDBaFw0wMjA4MjkyMzU5NTlaMIGSMQswCQYDVQQGEwJa QTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRvd24xDzANBgNVBAoT BlRoYXd0ZTEdMBsGA1UECxMUQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMxKDAmBgNVBAMTH1BlcnNv bmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIFJTQSAyMDAwLjguMzAwgZ8wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADgY0AMIGJAoGB AN4zMqZjxwklRT7SbngnZ4HF2ogZgpcO40QpimM1Km1wPPrcrvfudG8wvDOQf/k0caCjbZjx w0+iZdsN+kvx1t1hpfmFzVWaNRqdknWoJ67Ycvm6AvbXsJHeHOmr4BgDqHxDQlBRh4M88Dm0 m1SKE4f/s5udSWYALQmJ7JRr6aFpAgMBAAGjTjBMMCkGA1UdEQQiMCCkHjAcMRowGAYDVQQD ExFQcml2YXRlTGFiZWwxLTI5NzASBgNVHRMBAf8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMAsGA1UdDwQEAwIBBjAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFAAOBgQBzG28mZYv/FTRLWWKK7US+ScfoDbuPuQ1qJipihB+4h2N0HG23 zxpTkUvhzeY42e1Q9DpsNJKs5pKcbsEjAcIJp+9LrnLdBmf1UG8uWLi2C8FQV7XsHNfvF7bV iJu3ooga7TlbOX00/LaWGCVNavSdxcORL6mWuAU8Uvzd6WIDSDGCAfUwggHxAgEBMIGaMIGS MQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTEVMBMGA1UECBMMV2VzdGVybiBDYXBlMRIwEAYDVQQHEwlDYXBlIFRv d24xDzANBgNVBAoTBlRoYXd0ZTEdMBsGA1UECxMUQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2VydmljZXMxKDAm BgNVBAMTH1BlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIFJTQSAyMDAwLjguMzACAwQErjAJBgUrDgMCGgUA oIGxMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTAxMDUwNDA2 MzczNVowIwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMRYEFLbKqLaKyIrSziS7S6w66Vw9Sb9vMFIGCSqGSIb3DQEJ DzFFMEMwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcwDgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMC AgFAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEoMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIGAbN3RWKnpCCxLhDeE1LUqe36+ YqAiHZ14rW/Og24MPRWoP3mLVbb2zzPk5fYEDXGI8x3EbuOS/8h3VQia5mcje6JR6FWpA+Wi 1ZHhQOJHdDbYekNILeR5fr4k0n2iHqPkoZeqLkF4b0s+DQnG/PLeiKvI+J9ZlqU9v/2tRANt tuU= --------------msF3182803C47209B2D56F5ABF-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu May 3 22:57:58 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from grif0.newmail.ru (grif0.newmail.ru [212.48.140.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A8B8537B422 for ; Thu, 3 May 2001 22:57:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Andrew.Karjagin@newmail.ru) Received: (qmail 16523 invoked by alias); 4 May 2001 05:57:51 -0000 Message-ID: <20010504055751.16519.qmail@grif0.newmail.ru> From: "Andrew Karjagin" To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Reply-To: Subject: IDC 8-port modem pool Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 09:57:51 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-UID: 8-21688 X-Originating-IP: [212.42.53.200] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello! I have PX-800 8-port modem pool from IDC (PCI slot, 8-port multiplexor and 8 modems in one) and I want to install it on my server with FreeBSD 4.2. I am reconfigure the kernel: device sio0 at isa? COM1 --- device sio1 at isa? COM2 --- options COM_MULTIPORT device sio2 at pci? irq? device sio3 at pci? ------ device sio9 at pci? But the kernel doesn"t see the pool at reboot. May be anybody use it pool (if IDC made pool, so IDC sell the poll) and can help me? On Linux Slackware 2.2.16 it worked but there must be using the mmodem (Inpro M Modem) driver for Linux. Thank you for your help! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri May 4 8:48:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from hawk-systems.com (hawk-systems.com [161.58.152.235]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C59337B422 for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 08:48:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dave@hawk-systems.com) Received: from server0 (204-50-168-20.mb.skyweb.ca [204.50.168.20]) by hawk-systems.com (8.8.8) id JAA82012 for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 09:48:37 -0600 (MDT) From: "Dave VanAuken" To: Subject: any cisco gurus out there... (AS5300, Octal T1, 48 DMM, IOS 12.1) Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 11:50:21 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-Reply-To: <20010504055751.16519.qmail@grif0.newmail.ru> Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org we finally made the move and purchased all this spanking new cisco equipment to connect users to our FreeBSD boxes... router and switch configuration were relatively easy once you get the feel fro Cisco IOS (12.1) but am having a devil of a time with the AS5300 Access server. Appreciate any online resources, or offers to review the config file to determin why we aren't getting through to the access server - >> busy signal only << Have been through most of Cisco's online resources, everything looks in order. Have doublechecked the status of the line with local bell... brick wall. Am not going to post more here because of relavance, but this list has been one of the better sources of expertise so seemed like a good place to ask for directions. Appreciate any responses. Dave To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri May 4 10: 0: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ns.shawneelink.net (ns.shawneelink.net [216.240.66.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A9D737B424 for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 09:59:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jb@jbacher.com) Received: from ns.shawneelink.net (ns.shawneelink.net [216.240.66.11]) by ns.shawneelink.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f44GxcM18561; Fri, 4 May 2001 11:59:38 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 11:59:38 -0500 (CDT) From: J Bacher X-Sender: jb@ns.shawneelink.net To: Dave VanAuken Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: any cisco gurus out there... (AS5300, Octal T1, 48 DMM, IOS 12.1) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > >> busy signal only << > > Have been through most of Cisco's online resources, everything looks > in order. Have doublechecked the status of the line with local > bell... brick wall. > > Am not going to post more here because of relavance, but this list has > been one of the better sources of expertise so seemed like a good > place to ask for directions. > > Appreciate any responses. Verify that the coding and framing on the span matches the Cisco configuration. Determine whether the controller is in up state. If those look good, telco either has a busy on the span (normal to prevent switch alarms prior to turning up new circuits) or that the correct DTMF/MF is used. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri May 4 14:20:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from opus.cts.cwu.edu (opus.cts.cwu.edu [198.104.92.71]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B46937B422 for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 14:20:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from skynyrd@opus.cts.cwu.edu) Received: from localhost (skynyrd@localhost) by opus.cts.cwu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA74696; Fri, 4 May 2001 14:20:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 14:20:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Timmons To: Dave VanAuken Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: any cisco gurus out there... (AS5300, Octal T1, 48 DMM, IOS 12.1) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org what does 'show controllers t1' look like? my telco couldn't tell me what kind of signalling they were using(!), so I had to manually try different parameters to the cas-group command in t1 controller config mode. i wound up finally getting success with: cas-group 0 timeslots 1-24 type e&m-fgd Regards, -Chris On Fri, 4 May 2001, Dave VanAuken wrote: > >> busy signal only << > > Have been through most of Cisco's online resources, everything looks > in order. Have doublechecked the status of the line with local > bell... brick wall. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat May 5 5:25:26 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from velvet.sensation.net.au (serial1-2-velvet-brunswick.sensation.net.au [203.20.114.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4580E37B422 for ; Sat, 5 May 2001 05:25:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rowan@sensation.net.au) Received: from localhost (rowan@localhost) by velvet.sensation.net.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA28105 for ; Sat, 5 May 2001 22:25:05 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from rowan@sensation.net.au) X-Authentication-Warning: velvet.sensation.net.au: rowan owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 5 May 2001 22:25:03 +1000 (EST) From: Rowan Crowe To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: value for content Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi all, This is not strictly FreeBSD related so I'll keep it brief. This may sound a little naive, but I'm looking for someone who can get value for outbound web traffic. I run a web site which is fairly bandwidth hungry, and I'm looking for ways to offset those costs. Advertising revenue doesn't bring in much, so the site is currently running on borrowed time (and favours :-( ). Current traffic levels are 500-600Gb out per month. If you think you can get some peering value from this amount of data (ie an upstream pays you directy for the data, or gives you a discount on your pipe for sending out a lot of content), then please give me a yell in private. Thanks for your time... Cheers. -- Rowan Crowe http://www.rowan.sensation.net.au/ Sensation Internet Services http://info.sensation.net.au/ Melbourne, Australia Phone: +61-3-9329-5498 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat May 5 6:33:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from arthur.intraceptives.com.au (arthur.intraceptives.com.au [203.22.72.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED9BC37B42C for ; Sat, 5 May 2001 06:33:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wwlists@intraceptives.com.au) Received: (qmail 11182 invoked from network); 5 May 2001 13:33:20 -0000 Received: from wks-pc1.intraceptives.com.au (HELO waddy.intraceptives.com.au) (203.22.72.32) by arthur.intraceptives.com.au with SMTP; 5 May 2001 13:33:20 -0000 Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20010505232821.02493f00@arthur.intraceptives.com.au> X-Sender: wwlists@arthur.intraceptives.com.au X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Sat, 05 May 2001 23:33:17 +1000 To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG From: Warren Welch Subject: Modems on Cisco's with FreeBSD? In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi all, Does anyone have any idea on using Cisco modems (access servers 5200/5300 or 3600 series) to do inbound / outbound faxing, from FreeBSD? I would like to be be able to use these devices preferably as a device (/dev/xxxN). Is this possible? Any other solutions for a number of modems (preferably ISDN primary rate), to be used mainly for faxing? Thanks in advance, Warren wwelch@intraceptives.com.au To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message