From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Apr 25 09:41:14 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E7DE16A4CE
	for <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 09:41:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from snipers.mine.nu (YahooBB219008246026.bbtec.net [219.8.246.26])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2318043D1D
	for <freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>; Sun, 25 Apr 2004 09:41:14 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kochi@netbsd.org)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by snipers.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D968878724; Mon, 26 Apr 2004 01:41:12 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 01:41:12 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20040426.014112.74748210.kochi@netbsd.org>
To: nate@root.org
From: Takayoshi Kochi <kochi@netbsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040421194653.F40302@root.org>
References: <BF1FE1855350A0479097B3A0D2A80EE002FF25F0@hdsmsx402.hd.intel.com>
	<20040421194653.F40302@root.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
cc: kanaoka@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: ACPI SCI flags
X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: ACPI and power management development <freebsd-acpi.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi>,
	<mailto:freebsd-acpi-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 16:41:14 -0000

Hi,

From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
Subject: Re: ACPI SCI flags
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 19:48:52 -0700 (PDT)

> On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Brown, Len wrote:
> > Nate,
> >
> > I think we finally got the vague part of the ACPI spec
> > regarding SCI polarity/trigger cleared up.  In Linux
> > as of 2.4.26 and 2.6.5 we now do this:
> >
> > PIC mode:
> > 	force level/low via ELCR always.
> 
> Did you find that made a difference on some systems?  If so, which ones?
> The opinion here was that ELCR is probably EISA-only.

Kanaoka-san reported that if SCI is not set level-trigger,
the SCI doesn't work properly on his laptop.
It (Libretto L3) has ALi chipsets (1543 south bridge).

When I tested on my laptop (ThinkPad X31, Intel ICH4),
it seemed that the setting of ELCR didn't make any difference, though.

---
Takayoshi Kochi