From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 01:29:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEB616A4CE for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 01:29:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78CD43D3F for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 01:29:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcapote@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z35so58309rne for ; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 17:29:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:return-path:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=csycY43rzwnc5Y9d0uPEugBJHL27tq4+68KGAE/e8t2beMb+tflfk285wJjjP0ObOo4mRm6gq1xujFR4CpQYG61tSQiPwCo5YuGRVmyGgTxLCNF9NpoHvySZTC10KEg1aVweibP81bZHAq+c1RoV1htBo9Z6qOG6Q8Cj4mNRjDY= Received: by 10.38.96.9 with SMTP id t9mr1458558rnb; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 17:29:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.0.110? ([68.209.242.57]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTP id 73sm18486rna.2004.12.04.17.29.19; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 17:29:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <41B1BBEC.4050508@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 08:30:20 -0500 From: Julio Capote User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041109) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Udo References: <41B07635.9060705@swebase.com> <41B1BB7A.1010100@dnainternet.net> In-Reply-To: <41B1BB7A.1010100@dnainternet.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Rebooting the kernel without resetting uptime? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 01:29:21 -0000 Erik Udo wrote: > Stefan Midjich wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I know a guy i respect on IRC told me this is not possible but since >> this is the hackers list i thought the topic at least deserves a >> discussion. I guess i wont be able to sit still until someone either >> does it or shows me why it can't be done. > > > Everthing is possible! Even more possible if the source is open! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Im pretty interested in this aswell....I'd have INFINITE uptime! =) - Julio From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 09:58:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C1316A4CE; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 09:58:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net (outbound01.telus.net [199.185.220.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A462043D4C; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 09:58:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cpressey@catseye.mine.nu) Received: from catseye.biscuit.boo ([154.20.76.195]) by priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.netSMTP <20041205095834.NWFQ25796.priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net@catseye.biscuit.boo>; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 02:58:34 -0700 Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 02:01:58 -0800 From: Chris Pressey To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20041205020158.3f6e0a63.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: <41AE3F80.1000506@freebsd.org> References: <41AE3F80.1000506@freebsd.org> Organization: Cat's Eye Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0beta3 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: scottl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My project wish-list for the next 12 months X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 09:58:35 -0000 On Wed, 01 Dec 2004 15:02:40 -0700 Scott Long wrote: > All, > > I know that I said last month that we were going to stop promising > specific features for the next major release. However, I'd like to > throw out a list of things that would be really nice to have in the > future, whether its 6.0 or 7.0 or whatever. Most of these tasks are > not trivial, but I hope that talking about them will encourage some > interest. These are in no particular priority order. I'd also be > thrilled if someone wanted to dress this list up in docbook and add > it to the webpage. While this is just my personal list, I'd welcome > other additions to it (in the sense of significant projects, not just > individual PRs or bug fixes that one might be interested in). > > [...] > > 2. New installer. I know some people still consider this a joke, but > the reality is that sysinstall is no longer state of the art. It's > fairly good at the simple task that it does, but it's becoming harder > and harder to fix bugs and extend functionality in it. It's also > fairly unfriendly to those of us who haven't been using it since 1995. > The DFly folks have some very interesting work in this area > (www.bsdinstaller.com) and it would be very good to see if we can > collaborate with them on it. I'm glad you find it interesting. If you have any questions, feel free to ask. There are definately two factors to consider in any attempt to integrate this installer with the FreeBSD release process. One is that it is designed to be run from a fairly full-featured environment (i.e. a LiveCD.) It has been successfully integrated with the latest FreeSBIE though, so beyond that I wouldn't expect many technical difficulties. The other factor is that the BSD installer project is (not unlike DragonFly itself) quite experimental, and we don't hesitate to rewrite entire subsystems (and break the interfaces between them) when a better idea and/or more tractable code comes along. Anyway, since you asked, if I were to write a wish-list for FreeBSD, I guess it would look something like: 1. Flesh out the mission statement, such as it is (FAQ #1.2.) "We provide no-strings-attached software" is an excellent start, but by itself, it's awkwardly nonspecific. Extend it by specifying that the provided software does come, in fact, in the form of an operating system, and describe the intended properties of such (performant/ stable/featureful/easy-to-use/whatever/etc/etc.) -Chris From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 19:11:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 573BD16A4CE for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 19:11:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA4043D60 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 19:11:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iB5JBpVo087195 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 22:11:51 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 22:11:51 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky X-X-Sender: marck@woozle.rinet.ru To: hackers@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20041205215516.Q79805@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: 5.3-R PXE installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 19:11:59 -0000 Dear colleagues, I'm trying to setup PXE istallation for new server. Up to pxeboot everything goes smoothly. pxeboot mounting NFS root successively; however, it immediately whines with Loader version 1.1+ required Aborted! start not found then it loads kernel (which I gunzipped from kern.gz from floppies) successfully, draws '|', reinitializes keyboard, hangs for about 10-20 secs and silently reboots. The same effect if using kernel from miniinst/fixit CD. Any clues? Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] --------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@FreeBSD.org *** --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 5 19:19:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F34716A4CE for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 19:19:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3FCE43D49 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 19:19:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iB5JJiQU087287 for ; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 22:19:44 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 22:19:44 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky X-X-Sender: marck@woozle.rinet.ru To: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20041205215516.Q79805@woozle.rinet.ru> Message-ID: <20041205221827.B79805@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20041205215516.Q79805@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: 5.3-R PXE installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 19:19:46 -0000 On Sun, 5 Dec 2004, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: DM> I'm trying to setup PXE istallation for new server. Up to pxeboot everything DM> goes smoothly. pxeboot mounting NFS root successively; however, it DM> immediately whines with DM> DM> Loader version 1.1+ required DM> Aborted! DM> start not found DM> DM> then it loads kernel (which I gunzipped from kern.gz from floppies) DM> successfully, draws '|', reinitializes keyboard, hangs for about 10-20 secs DM> and silently reboots. The same effect if using kernel from miniinst/fixit DM> CD. DM> DM> Any clues? For archives/searches: Answer is simple than anyone can think: pxeboot was from RELENG_4. Replacing it with RELENG_5 version fixes booting. Sorry for the noise. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] --------------------------------------------------------------------------- *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@FreeBSD.org *** --------------------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 02:24:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96C916A4CE for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 02:24:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay02.pair.com (relay02.pair.com [209.68.5.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57DAA43D3F for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 02:24:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 99539 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2004 02:24:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 6 Dec 2004 02:24:04 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 20:24:02 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack To: Stefan Midjich In-Reply-To: <41B07635.9060705@swebase.com> Message-ID: <20041205202236.M66036@odysseus.silby.com> References: <41B07635.9060705@swebase.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Rebooting the kernel without resetting uptime? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 02:24:06 -0000 On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Stefan Midjich wrote: > Hi > > I know a guy i respect on IRC told me this is not possible but since this is > the hackers list i thought the topic at least deserves a discussion. I guess > i wont be able to sit still until someone either does it or shows me why it > can't be done. Faking the uptime which is retrieved by netcraft and other services which check TCP timestamps would be easy. Faking your local uptime might be a bit more work, there could be sideeffects of accelerating the timecounters. Mike "Silby" Silbersack From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 02:48:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5E816A4CE for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 02:48:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.speakeasy.net (mail1.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D3D43D2F for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 02:48:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: (qmail 25861 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2004 02:48:14 -0000 Received: from gate.funkthat.com (HELO hydrogen.funkthat.com) ([69.17.45.168]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 6 Dec 2004 02:48:14 -0000 Received: from hydrogen.funkthat.com (wluzyr@localhost.funkthat.com [127.0.0.1])iB62mEGH096172; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:48:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: (from jmg@localhost) by hydrogen.funkthat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id iB62mD2f096171; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:48:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:48:13 -0800 From: John-Mark Gurney To: Mike Silbersack Message-ID: <20041206024813.GN19624@funkthat.com> Mail-Followup-To: Mike Silbersack , Stefan Midjich , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <41B07635.9060705@swebase.com> <20041205202236.M66036@odysseus.silby.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041205202236.M66036@odysseus.silby.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386 X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 EC EF F8 AE ED A7 31 96 7A 22 B3 D8 56 36 F4 X-Files: The truth is out there X-URL: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/ X-Resume: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/resume.html cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: Stefan Midjich Subject: Re: Rebooting the kernel without resetting uptime? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 02:48:15 -0000 Mike Silbersack wrote this message on Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 20:24 -0600: > On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Stefan Midjich wrote: > > >I know a guy i respect on IRC told me this is not possible but since this > >is the hackers list i thought the topic at least deserves a discussion. I > >guess i wont be able to sit still until someone either does it or shows me > >why it can't be done. > > Faking the uptime which is retrieved by netcraft and other services which > check TCP timestamps would be easy. > > Faking your local uptime might be a bit more work, there could be > sideeffects of accelerating the timecounters. Bah, it's not that hard, just write out the current uptime on shutdown, then update the boottime and uptime on bootup... make their sysctl's writable, it shouldn't be a problem.. though what's just a number, might as well make your uptime 500 years.. :) that'd really throw everyone.. -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not." From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 02:51:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C6916A4CE for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 02:51:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.speakeasy.net (mail1.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3194843D5D for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 02:51:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: (qmail 29839 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2004 02:51:27 -0000 Received: from gate.funkthat.com (HELO hydrogen.funkthat.com) ([69.17.45.168]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 6 Dec 2004 02:51:26 -0000 Received: from hydrogen.funkthat.com (kvenmb@localhost.funkthat.com [127.0.0.1])iB62pQGH096297; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:51:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: (from jmg@localhost) by hydrogen.funkthat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id iB62pQa4096296; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:51:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:51:26 -0800 From: John-Mark Gurney To: "Kamal R. Prasad" Message-ID: <20041206025126.GO19624@funkthat.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Kamal R. Prasad" , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <41B20B19.3090204@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41B20B19.3090204@acm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386 X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 EC EF F8 AE ED A7 31 96 7A 22 B3 D8 56 36 F4 X-Files: The truth is out there X-URL: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/ X-Resume: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/resume.html cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mmap() X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 02:51:27 -0000 Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 00:38 +0530: > I wrote an mmap() interface for a USB device. But when I made a call to > it using mmap(), I saw that mmap interface is called 3-4 times. The > calls are being made from within mmap() i.e. sys/vm/vm_mmap.c. Can > someone tell me if there is something like a re-try going on for some > reason? > From userspace, I called it as > addr = mmap(NULL, 1024, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0); > The version of OS is Freebsd 5.3(stable). each mmap call will be called whenever the kernel needs to map that specific page.. say you map 16k of your device... it won't map any of the 16k until the first time it is accessed, then it will call the mmap routine for each page as it is accessed... it is also possible that memory for the mappings needs to be reclaimed, at which point those page mappings will be reaped, and your mmap function will be called again when they need to be accessed again.. -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not." From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 03:06:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550FC16A4CE for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 03:06:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ion.gank.org (ion.gank.org [69.55.238.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1941743D2F for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 03:06:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from craig@tobuj.gank.org) Received: from aldaris.auir.gank.org (arbiter.gank.org [64.81.113.221]) by ion.gank.org (mail) with ESMTP id 9F2A32A98A; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 21:06:48 -0600 (CST) From: Craig Boston To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 21:06:35 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <41B07635.9060705@swebase.com> In-Reply-To: <41B07635.9060705@swebase.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200412052106.36219.craig@tobuj.gank.org> cc: Stefan Midjich Subject: Re: Rebooting the kernel without resetting uptime? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 03:06:49 -0000 On Friday 03 December 2004 8:20 am, Stefan Midjich wrote: > I know a guy i respect on IRC told me this is not possible but since > this is the hackers list i thought the topic at least deserves a > discussion. I guess i wont be able to sit still until someone either > does it or shows me why it can't be done. Of course you can. Just attach gdb to your running kernel and muck with the global boottime structure. That's considered cheating, though, so don't do it! ( a few minutes later ) Hmm, apparently either something has changed in kgdb in 5.3 or I just forgot the magic incantation, because it doesn't seem to allow modification of memory -- just "Bad file descriptor". Getting the address from there and writing to /dev/kmem directly still works though. the-cheat# uname -r 5.3-STABLE the-cheat# uptime 9:03PM up 3485 days, 21:44, 1 user, load averages: 0.24, 0.12, 0.12 the-cheat# sysctl kern.boottime kern.boottime: { sec = 801120000, usec = 345099 } Mon May 22 00:20:00 1995 the-cheat# :-P Craig From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 05:47:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E88016A4CE for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 05:47:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ims-1.prv.ampira.com (ims-1.ampira.com [66.179.231.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8752E43D6A for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 05:46:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kamalp@acm.org) Received: from [202.142.94.194] (helo=[172.16.3.26]) by ims-1.prv.ampira.com with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CbBes-0005Mf-Ig; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 00:43:39 -0500 Message-ID: <41B3F24B.1000903@acm.org> Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 11:16:51 +0530 From: "Kamal R. Prasad" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John-Mark Gurney References: <41B20B19.3090204@acm.org> <20041206025126.GO19624@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <20041206025126.GO19624@funkthat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mmap() X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 05:47:00 -0000 John-Mark Gurney wrote: >Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 00:38 +0530: > > >>I wrote an mmap() interface for a USB device. But when I made a call to >>it using mmap(), I saw that mmap interface is called 3-4 times. The >>calls are being made from within mmap() i.e. sys/vm/vm_mmap.c. Can >>someone tell me if there is something like a re-try going on for some >>reason? >>From userspace, I called it as >>addr = mmap(NULL, 1024, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0); >>The version of OS is Freebsd 5.3(stable). >> >> > >each mmap call will be called whenever the kernel needs to map that >specific page.. say you map 16k of your device... it won't map any >of the 16k until the first time it is accessed, then it will call the >mmap routine for each page as it is accessed... it is also possible that >memory for the mappings needs to be reclaimed, at which point those page >mappings will be reaped, and your mmap function will be called again when >they need to be accessed again.. > > > Thanks. But then, the mmap'ed() address was yet to be used by the user space and I don't see the need for multiple calls to my interface almost as if in a while loop. Is there any return value from the mmap() interface that could trigger another call? I am returning 0 after setting the param to vtophys(kernel virtual address). regards -kamal From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 07:42:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBF216A4CE for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 07:42:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail6.speakeasy.net (mail6.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95ABC43D5C for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 07:42:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: (qmail 19147 invoked from network); 6 Dec 2004 07:42:38 -0000 Received: from gate.funkthat.com (HELO hydrogen.funkthat.com) ([69.17.45.168]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 6 Dec 2004 07:42:38 -0000 Received: from hydrogen.funkthat.com (rgripy@localhost.funkthat.com [127.0.0.1])iB67gbGH002098; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 23:42:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: (from jmg@localhost) by hydrogen.funkthat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id iB67gbjh002097; Sun, 5 Dec 2004 23:42:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 23:42:37 -0800 From: John-Mark Gurney To: "Kamal R. Prasad" Message-ID: <20041206074237.GP19624@funkthat.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Kamal R. Prasad" , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <41B20B19.3090204@acm.org> <20041206025126.GO19624@funkthat.com> <41B3F24B.1000903@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41B3F24B.1000903@acm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386 X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 EC EF F8 AE ED A7 31 96 7A 22 B3 D8 56 36 F4 X-Files: The truth is out there X-URL: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/ X-Resume: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/resume.html cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mmap() X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 07:42:39 -0000 Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 11:16 +0530: > John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > >Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 00:38 +0530: > > > > > >>I wrote an mmap() interface for a USB device. But when I made a call to > >>it using mmap(), I saw that mmap interface is called 3-4 times. The > >>calls are being made from within mmap() i.e. sys/vm/vm_mmap.c. Can > >>someone tell me if there is something like a re-try going on for some > >>reason? > >>From userspace, I called it as > >>addr = mmap(NULL, 1024, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0); > >>The version of OS is Freebsd 5.3(stable). > >> > >> > > > >each mmap call will be called whenever the kernel needs to map that > >specific page.. say you map 16k of your device... it won't map any > >of the 16k until the first time it is accessed, then it will call the > >mmap routine for each page as it is accessed... it is also possible that > >memory for the mappings needs to be reclaimed, at which point those page > >mappings will be reaped, and your mmap function will be called again when > >they need to be accessed again.. > > > > > > > Thanks. But then, the mmap'ed() address was yet to be used by the user > space and I don't see the need for multiple calls to my interface almost > as if in a while loop. Is there any return value from the mmap() > interface that could trigger another call? I am returning 0 after > setting the param to vtophys(kernel virtual address). You are suppose to return 0 on success (that the permission are correct and doable i.e. that you can write when the write bit is set) and put the phys adder in paddr... If you look at sys/vm/device_pager.c, you'll see that on line 139, it makes sure that the permissions are correct for the entire mapping (that the user doesn't try to map for writing a read-only mapping)... Then later at line 222, is when the actual mapping gets done.. -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not." From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 07:56:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DDAB16A4CE for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 07:56:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.hexe.com.pl (www.hexe.com.pl [212.160.230.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8A243D5A for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 07:56:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from clamav@www.hexe.com.pl) Received: from www.hexe.com.pl (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) iB67U1c9013228; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 08:30:02 +0100 Received: (from clamav@localhost) by www.hexe.com.pl (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id iB67TjAU013196; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 08:29:45 +0100 Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 08:29:45 +0100 Message-Id: <200412060729.iB67TjAU013196@www.hexe.com.pl> From: To: Auto-Submitted: auto-submitted (antivirus notify) X-Infected-Received-From: ajo48.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.25.248.48] X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.75-1, clamav-milter version 0.74a on www X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: postmaster@www.hexe.com.pl cc: k.kostacinska@hexe.com.pl Subject: Virus intercepted X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 07:56:36 -0000 A message you sent to contained Worm.SomeFool.X and has not been delivered. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 18:51:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB32016A4CE for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 18:51:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailfe03.swip.net (mailfe03.swip.net [212.247.154.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62E143D62 for ; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 18:51:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) X-T2-Posting-ID: Y1QAsIk9O44SO+J/q9KNyQ== Received: from [193.216.45.91] (HELO curly.tele2.no) by mailfe03.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.6) with ESMTP id 40830800 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 19:51:12 +0100 Received: (from root@localhost) by curly.tele2.no (8.12.5/8.12.3) id iB6IvBIP000596 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:57:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:57:09 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041206195709.A332@curly.tele2.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Subject: hostname lookup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 18:51:16 -0000 Hi, I have come across a problem where res_send() goes into a minute-long wait loop, waiting for the hostname to be looked up, after a getaddrinfo() call. I have captured the packets sent/received, and according to the code the query response does not match. Is this a bug in libc or is it a DNS server problem? A temporary patch is to make the code go on with the next packet instead of waiting for a timeout. Then getaddrinfo only takes a few seconds more, instead of a minute. src/lib/libc/net/res_send.c:res_send(): if (!(_res.options & RES_INSECURE2) && !res_queriesmatch(buf, buf + buflen, ans, ans + anssiz)) { /* * response contains wrong query? ignore it. * XXX - potential security hazard could * be detected here. */ DprintQ((_res.options & RES_DEBUG) || (_res.pfcode & RES_PRF_REPLY), (stdout, ";; wrong query name:\n"), ans, (resplen>anssiz)?anssiz:resplen); res_close(); goto next_ns; //goto wait; } Trace output from "fetch www.google.com" on a PPP link: 8X (fails): -- TE->NT - unit:0 - frame:000175 - time:03.12 19:11:46.845441 - length:69 ----- B2:000 ff 03 00 3d c0 00 00 0b 21 45 00 00 3c 02 43 00 ...=....!E..<.C. B2:010 00 40 11 28 a3 c1 d9 cb 0f c1 d8 01 0a c3 9a 00 .@.(............ B2:020 35 00 28 6d 95 ef aa 01 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 5.(m............ B2:030 00 03 77 77 77 06 67 6f 6f 67 6c 65 03 63 6f 6d ..www.google.com B2:040 00 00 1c 00 01 ..... -- NT->TE - unit:0 - frame:000176 - time:03.12 19:11:46.971341 - length:71 ----- B2:000 ff 03 00 21 45 00 00 43 74 53 40 00 fc 11 ba 8a ...!E..CtS@..... B2:010 c1 d8 01 0a c1 d9 cb 0f 00 35 c3 9a 00 2f 06 6b .........5.../.k B2:020 ef aa 81 80 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 03 77 77 77 .............www B2:030 06 67 6f 6f 67 6c 65 06 61 6b 61 64 6e 73 03 6e .google.akadns.n B2:040 65 74 00 00 1c 00 01 et..... (above is IPv6 (AAAA), below is IPv4 (A) ??) 1X (succeeds): -- TE->NT - unit:0 - frame:000211 - time:03.12 19:13:08.633794 - length:69 ----- B2:000 ff 03 00 3d c0 00 00 17 21 45 00 00 3c 02 4b 00 ...=....!E..<.K. B2:010 00 40 11 28 9b c1 d9 cb 0f c1 d8 01 0a ef 03 00 .@.(............ B2:020 35 00 28 42 46 ef ab 01 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 5.(BF........... B2:030 00 03 77 77 77 06 67 6f 6f 67 6c 65 03 63 6f 6d ..www.google.com B2:040 00 00 01 00 01 ..... -- NT->TE - unit:0 - frame:000212 - time:03.12 19:13:08.825249 - length:531 ---- B2:000 ff 03 00 21 45 00 02 0f 74 57 40 00 fc 11 b8 ba ...!E...tW@..... B2:010 c1 d8 01 0a c1 d9 cb 0f 00 35 ef 03 01 fb cc 3d .........5.....= B2:020 ef ab 81 80 00 01 00 03 00 0d 00 0c 03 77 77 77 .............www B2:030 06 67 6f 6f 67 6c 65 03 63 6f 6d 00 00 01 00 01 .google.com..... B2:040 c0 0c 00 05 00 01 00 00 00 1e 00 17 03 77 77 77 .............www B2:050 06 67 6f 6f 67 6c 65 06 61 6b 61 64 6e 73 03 6e .google.akadns.n B2:060 65 74 00 c0 2c 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 8e 00 04 42 et..,..........B B2:070 66 0b 68 c0 2c 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 8e 00 04 42 f.h.,..........B B2:080 66 0b 63 00 00 02 00 01 00 02 3e 59 00 11 01 41 f.c.......>Y...A B2:090 0c 52 4f 4f 54 2d 53 45 52 56 45 52 53 c0 3e 00 .ROOT-SERVERS.>. B2:0a0 00 02 00 01 00 02 3e 59 00 04 01 48 c0 70 00 00 ......>Y...H.p.. B2:0b0 02 00 01 00 02 3e 59 00 04 01 43 c0 70 00 00 02 .....>Y...C.p... B2:0c0 00 01 00 02 3e 59 00 04 01 47 c0 70 00 00 02 00 ....>Y...G.p.... B2:0d0 01 00 02 3e 59 00 04 01 46 c0 70 00 00 02 00 01 ...>Y...F.p..... B2:0e0 00 02 3e 59 00 04 01 42 c0 70 00 00 02 00 01 00 ..>Y...B.p...... B2:0f0 02 3e 59 00 04 01 4a c0 70 00 00 02 00 01 00 02 .>Y...J.p....... B2:100 3e 59 00 04 01 4b c0 70 00 00 02 00 01 00 02 3e >Y...K.p.......> B2:110 59 00 04 01 4c c0 70 00 00 02 00 01 00 02 3e 59 Y...L.p.......>Y B2:120 00 04 01 4d c0 70 00 00 02 00 01 00 02 3e 59 00 ...M.p.......>Y. B2:130 04 01 49 c0 70 00 00 02 00 01 00 02 3e 59 00 04 ..I.p.......>Y.. B2:140 01 45 c0 70 00 00 02 00 01 00 02 3e 59 00 04 01 .E.p.......>Y... B2:150 44 c0 70 c0 6e 00 01 00 01 00 06 33 f4 00 04 c6 D.p.n......3.... B2:160 29 00 04 c0 8a 00 01 00 01 00 06 33 f4 00 04 80 )..........3.... B2:170 3f 02 35 c0 99 00 01 00 01 00 06 33 f4 00 04 c0 ?.5........3.... B2:180 21 04 0c c0 a8 00 01 00 01 00 06 33 f4 00 04 c0 !..........3.... B2:190 70 24 04 c0 b7 00 01 00 01 00 06 33 f4 00 04 c0 p$.........3.... B2:1a0 05 05 f1 c0 c6 00 01 00 01 00 06 33 f4 00 04 c0 ...........3.... B2:1b0 e4 4f c9 c0 d5 00 01 00 01 00 06 33 89 00 04 c0 .O.........3.... B2:1c0 3a 80 1e c0 e4 00 01 00 01 00 06 33 89 00 04 c1 :..........3.... B2:1d0 00 0e 81 c0 f3 00 01 00 01 00 06 33 89 00 04 c6 ...........3.... B2:1e0 20 40 0c c1 02 00 01 00 01 00 06 33 89 00 04 ca @.........3.... B2:1f0 0c 1b 21 c1 11 00 01 00 01 00 06 33 89 00 04 c0 ..!........3.... B2:200 24 94 11 c1 20 00 01 00 01 00 06 33 f4 00 04 c0 $... ......3.... B2:210 cb e6 0a ... Yours -HPS From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 06:58:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1274116A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 06:58:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao10.cox.net (lakermmtao10.cox.net [68.230.240.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA8843D3F for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 06:58:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bagus@cox.net) Received: from bagus ([24.252.103.174]) by lakermmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with SMTP id <20041207065857.RRWC1654.lakermmtao10.cox.net@bagus> for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 01:58:57 -0500 From: "Bagus" To: "Freebsd-Hackers@Freebsd. Org" Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 01:05:21 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20041206195709.A332@curly.tele2.no> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600 Subject: finding and mounting a fat partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 06:58:59 -0000 Hi, When I built my box, I split the disk into two partitions, one 8 gig partition for freebsd and one 2 gig fat one in case I ever wanted to change my mind and install a different operating system on the box. Of course, I've never wanted to do that, but I would like to now use that 2 gigs of diskspace for stuff now if I could. I found this little bit of information: http://www.freebsdhowtos.com/61.html but when I run a df, I don't see it listed, so I don't know what the device is called. Am I screwed? Any ideas? Thanks, Bagus From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 09:04:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E43F16A4CE; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:04:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F186B43D39; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:04:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB794NUV032367; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 19:34:24 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 19:34:14 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3311554.hbkNJMiNQ0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200412071934.21752.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -5.4 () IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Bagus Subject: Re: finding and mounting a fat partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 09:04:39 -0000 --nextPart3311554.hbkNJMiNQ0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline [ moved to freebsd-questions ] On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 17:35, Bagus wrote: > When I built my box, I split the disk into two partitions, one 8 gig > partition for freebsd and one 2 gig fat one in case I ever wanted to chan= ge > my mind and install a different operating system on the box. Of course, > I've never wanted to do that, but I would like to now use that 2 gigs of > diskspace for stuff now if I could. > > I found this little bit of information: > http://www.freebsdhowtos.com/61.html but when I run a df, I don't see it > listed, so I don't know what the device is called. What is the device that you installed on? ad0? =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart3311554.hbkNJMiNQ0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBtXIV5ZPcIHs/zowRAjJCAJ94iYUiHaxZZ5kWXp3u8yWeciOQ7QCcCYjU xkkaNnzJPzihTKIQMZ/Gsqo= =76yZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3311554.hbkNJMiNQ0-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 09:37:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9002D16A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:37:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A740B43D5C for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:37:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 7 Dec 2004 09:37:09 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 09:37:09 +0000 From: David Malone To: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: <20041207093709.GA41269@walton.maths.tcd.ie> References: <20041206195709.A332@curly.tele2.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041206195709.A332@curly.tele2.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hostname lookup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 09:37:11 -0000 On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 07:57:09PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > I have come across a problem where res_send() goes into a minute-long wait > loop, waiting for the hostname to be looked up, after a getaddrinfo() call. I > have captured the packets sent/received, and according to the code the > query response does not match. Is this a bug in libc or is it a DNS server > problem? It looks like the recursive name server is doing something weird. Can you have a look in your /etc/resolv.conf and get the IP address for your name server and then do: dig aaaa www.google.com @IP_ADDRESS_OF_NAME_SERVER dig a www.google.com @IP_ADDRESS_OF_NAME_SERVER Do you know what is acting as your recursive DNS server? David. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 10:48:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E3616A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:48:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2FE343D31 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:48:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon.burke@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 55so60423wri for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 02:48:55 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=f0i2HW9uQRVwLV62/Yf/hv7iM+m80lq6srRLgpPpF9QnjyDFcnUutZXIXgCVVODnar6YmwVmU79e4eQmL3ntQSwU4QPKEPXydgDSddmeOdGnYoWkfvgEhbvVLjyUbprTtMEe3i2pWimDXkgxytENutOdj3P604jTnyeJdXVh0is= Received: by 10.54.29.47 with SMTP id c47mr194608wrc; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 02:48:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.11.27 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 02:48:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2d7d2dd204120702483ac36b1a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 10:48:55 +0000 From: Simon Burke To: freebsd-users@uk.freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: UInaqble to install OpenOffice 1.1.3 from porte, 5.3R X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Simon Burke List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 10:48:56 -0000 Whener i try to install openoffice 1.1 from ports after several hours of compiling etc, i get the following error message. Is openoffice 1.1 port broken? or is it me? Im running 5.3R and i've cvsuped ports to get gnome 2.8 running which went fine. Any ideas? Making: ../../unxfbsd.pro/slo/com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.obj gcc32 -w -c -I. -I. -I../inc -I../../inc -I../../unx/inc -I../../unxfbsd.pro/inc -I. -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/solver/645/unxfbsd.pro/inc/dont_use_stl -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/solver/645/unxfbsd.pro/inc/external -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/solver/645/unxfbsd.pro/inc -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/solenv/unxfbsd/inc -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/solenv/inc -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/res -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/solver/645/unxfbsd.pro/inc/dont_use_stl -I/usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/solenv/inc/Xp31 -I/usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include -I/usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/freebsd -I/usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/bsd -I/usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/native_threads/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I. -I../../res -I. -I/usr/X11R6/include -O -pipe -fno-rtti -fPIC -DFREEBSD -DUNX -DVCL -DGCC -DC300 -DINTEL -DGXX_INCLUDE_PATH=/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i386-portbld-freebsd5.3/3.2.3/include/g++-v3 -DCVER=C300 -D_USE_NAMESPACE -D_USE_NAMESPACE=1 -DX86 -DNEW_SOLAR -DSTLPORT_VERSION=450 -DOSVERSION=503001 -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT -D__DMAKE -DUNIX -DCPPU_ENV=gcc3 -DSUPD=645 -DPRODUCT -DNDEBUG -DPRODUCT_FULL -DOSL_DEBUG_LEVEL=0 -DOPTIMIZE -DEXCEPTIONS_ON -DCUI -DSOLAR_JAVA -DSRX645 -DSHAREDLIB -D_DLL_ -DMULTITHREAD -w -o ../../unxfbsd.pro/slo/com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.o com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c In file included from com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.h:2, from com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:69: /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:27:20: jni_md.h: No such file or directory In file included from com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.h:2, from com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:69: /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:45: syntax error before "jsize" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:104: syntax error before "jbyte" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:107: syntax error before "i" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:108: syntax error before "j" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:112: syntax error before '}' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:193: syntax error before "jint" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:195: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:198: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:201: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:203: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:206: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:209: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:211: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:214: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:217: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:218: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:219: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:220: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:221: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:223: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:225: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:227: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:230: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:231: syntax error before "jint" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:231: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:232: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:235: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:237: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:239: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:241: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:243: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:245: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:246: syntax error before "jint" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:246: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:248: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:250: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:252: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:254: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:257: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:259: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:262: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:265: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:267: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:269: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:272: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:274: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:276: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:279: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:280: `jbyte' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:281: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:282: `jbyte' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:283: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:284: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:284: `jbyte' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:286: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:288: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:290: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:293: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:295: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:297: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:300: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:301: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:302: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:303: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:304: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:305: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:305: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:307: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:308: `jlong' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:309: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:310: `jlong' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:311: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:312: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:312: `jlong' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:314: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:316: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:318: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:321: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:323: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:325: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:328: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:330: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:332: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:335: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:337: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:340: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:344: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:346: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:349: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:353: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:354: `jbyte' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:355: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:357: `jbyte' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:358: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:360: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:360: `jbyte' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:362: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:364: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:367: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:371: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:373: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:376: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:380: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:381: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:382: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:384: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:385: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:387: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:387: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:389: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:390: `jlong' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:391: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:393: `jlong' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:394: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:396: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:396: `jlong' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:398: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:400: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:403: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:407: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:409: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:412: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:416: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:418: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:421: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:425: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:428: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:430: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:432: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:433: `jbyte' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:434: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:436: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:438: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:439: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:440: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:441: `jlong' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:442: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:444: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:447: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:449: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:451: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:453: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:455: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:457: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:459: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:461: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:463: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:466: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:469: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:471: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:473: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:476: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:478: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:480: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:483: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:484: `jbyte' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:485: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:486: `jbyte' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:487: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:488: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:488: `jbyte' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:490: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:492: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:494: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:497: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:499: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:501: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:504: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:505: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:506: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:507: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:508: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:509: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:509: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:511: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:512: `jlong' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:513: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:514: `jlong' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:515: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:516: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:516: `jlong' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:518: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:520: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:522: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:525: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:527: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:529: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:532: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:534: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:536: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:539: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:541: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:543: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:545: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:546: `jbyte' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:547: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:549: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:551: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:552: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:553: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:554: `jlong' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:555: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:557: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:560: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:562: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:564: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:566: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:568: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:570: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:572: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:574: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:576: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:579: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:581: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:582: `jsize' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:582: `jsize' redeclared as different kind of symbol /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:45: previous declaration of `jsize' /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:583: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:585: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:588: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:590: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:591: `jsize' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:592: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:594: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:598: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:599: `jsize' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:601: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:603: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:605: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:608: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:610: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:612: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:614: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:616: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:618: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:620: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:622: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:625: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:627: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:629: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:631: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:633: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:635: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:637: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:639: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:642: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:644: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:646: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:648: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:650: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:652: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:654: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:656: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:659: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:661: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:663: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:665: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:667: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:669: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:671: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:673: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:676: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:678: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:680: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:682: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:684: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:686: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:688: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:690: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:693: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:695: syntax error before "jint" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:695: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:696: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:697: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:699: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:700: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:701: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:702: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:704: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:705: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:707: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:709: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:712: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:714: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:717: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:719: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:722: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:724: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:727: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:730: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:732: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:734: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:735: `jlong' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:736: syntax error before '}' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1834: syntax error before "jint" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1839: syntax error before '}' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1842: syntax error before "jint" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1846: syntax error before '}' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1851: syntax error before "jint" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1854: syntax error before "checkSource" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1855: syntax error before "nativeStackSize" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1856: syntax error before "javaStackSize" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1857: syntax error before "minHeapSize" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1858: syntax error before "maxHeapSize" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1859: syntax error before "verifyMode" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1862: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1862: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1863: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1864: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1867: syntax error before "enableVerboseGC" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1868: syntax error before "disableAsyncGC" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1869: syntax error before "verbose" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1871: syntax error before "debugPort" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1888: syntax error before "jint" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1890: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1890: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1892: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1892: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1894: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1894: syntax error before "jint" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1894: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1896: syntax error before '*' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1896: `jint' declared as function returning a function /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1897: syntax error before '}' token /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1927: syntax error before "jint" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1930: syntax error before "jint" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1933: syntax error before "jint" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1934: syntax error before "jsize" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1937: syntax error before "jint" /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/include/jni.h:1940: syntax error before "void" In file included from com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:69: com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.h:15: syntax error before "void" com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.h:23: syntax error before "jint" com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.h:24: syntax error before "jint" com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.h:31: syntax error before "void" com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.h:39: syntax error before "void" com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.h:47: syntax error before "void" com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c: In function `getPipe': com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:92: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:97: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:97: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:101: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:106: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:106: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:109: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c: In function `jstring2ustring': com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:121: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:123: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c: At top level: com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:133: syntax error before "void" com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c: In function `Java_com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection_createJNI': com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:153: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:157: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:157: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:164: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:170: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:170: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:175: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:180: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:180: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:184: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:190: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:190: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:194: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:202: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:202: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:213: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:213: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:219: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:224: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:224: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:228: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:233: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:233: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:236: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:236: syntax error before "npipe" com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:240: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:252: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c: At top level: com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:267: syntax error before "void" com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c: In function `Java_com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection_closeJNI': com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:282: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:286: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:286: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:293: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:299: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:299: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:304: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:309: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:309: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:313: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:318: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:318: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:322: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:322: syntax error before numeric constant com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:329: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:335: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c: At top level: com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:349: syntax error before "jint" com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:350: syntax error before "jint" com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c: In function `Java_com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection_readJNI': com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:363: syntax error before "nread" com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:368: `env' undeclared (first use in this function) com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:368: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:368: for each function it appears in.) com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:368: `obj_this' undeclared (first use in this function) com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:394: `len' undeclared (first use in this function) com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:408: `nread' undeclared (first use in this function) com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:433: `buffer' undeclared (first use in this function) com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c: At top level: com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:465: syntax error before "void" com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c: In function `Java_com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection_writeJNI': com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:477: syntax error before "nwrite" com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:478: `nbuff' undeclared (first use in this function) com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:482: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:486: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:486: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:493: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:499: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:499: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:503: `nwrite' undeclared (first use in this function) com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:503: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:506: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:511: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:511: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:516: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:519: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:523: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:523: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:530: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:530: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:535: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:536: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:542: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:544: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c: At top level: com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.c:558: syntax error before "void" dmake: Error code 1, while making '../../unxfbsd.pro/slo/com_sun_star_lib_connections_pipe_PipeConnection.obj' ---* TG_SLO.MK *--- ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-1.1/work/OOo_1.1.3_src/jurt/source/pipe dmake: Error code 1, while making 'build_all' ---* TG_SLO.MK *--- *** Error code 255 -- Theres no place like ::1 Thanks, SimonB From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 13:53:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D2F16A4CE; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:53:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from jail1-fbsd4.consiagnet.it (jail1-fbsd4.consiagnet.it [83.149.128.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC27843D5C; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 13:53:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from saturnero@freesbie.org) Received: by jail1-fbsd4.consiagnet.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0AFFE579A; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 14:54:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 14:54:32 +0100 From: Dario Freni To: freesbie@gufi.org Message-ID: <20041206135432.GA38257@cvs.freesbie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV" Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE (What else? ;) X-GPG-Key: http://www.saturnero.net/saturnero.asc X-GPG-Fingerprint: 9C23 3CED 32A4 1E6E 7F83 042F CA68 BBD8 8892 872B User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 13:13:19 +0000 cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: FreeSBIE 1.1 Release Announcement X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 13:53:13 -0000 --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It's our honour and pleasure to announce FreeSBIE 1.1, a LiveCD based on FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE. Some of the innovations since 1.0 include: - A renewed series of scripts to support power users in the use of FreeSBIE 1.1. - An installer to let users install FreeSBIE 1.1 on their hard drives, thus having a powerful operating system such as FreeBSD, but with all the personalizations FreeSBIE 1.1 carries. - The presence of the best open source software, chosen and personalized, such as X.Org 6.7, XFCE 4.2RC1, Firefox 1.0 and Thunderbird 0.9.2. Moreover, many bugs were solved thanks also to the help of numerous beta testers which we are honoured to thank. For more information about FreeSBIE, visit the website: http://www.FreeSBIE.org Mission=20 FreeSBIE 1.1 was created from the omonimous toolkit to offer users a tool whose uses range from networking activities, to multimedia, to disaster recovery. The real limit FreeSBIE suffers from is user's fantasy, who will be able to appreciate its flexibility for many uses. Included software Along with FreeSBIE is distributed a complete and heterogenous collection of the best open source software now available, making it the ideal tool for the student, the teacher, the network administrator, the computer addicted, the scheptical, the curious and also the newbie taking a first approach to FreeBSD 5.3. For a complete list of the included software, please consult: http://www.freesbie.org/doc/1.1/FreeSBIE-1.1-i386.pkg_info.txt Innovations The most interesting innovation in FreeSBIE 1.1 is represented by the presence of the installer supplied by the DragonFlyBSD Installer Team (http://www.bsdinstaller.org), which will let users install FreeSBIE 1.1 on their hard drive. A help system was also created to help newcomers become familiar with FreeSBIE 1.1, and to let them know the tools it provides. FreeSBIE 1.1 comes with 2 Desktop Environments (apart from the well-known shell) to satisfy the needs of those who want a lightweight desktop environment, and those who want a complete one. Acknowledgments We would like to thank all the people who contributed to the creation of FreeSBIE. First of all, we would like to thank those who will inevitably be forgotten, whose help we will never forget. Our special thanks go to the FreeBSD core team, and to those who orbit around it: without you we wouldn't look at the world from obscure little windows nowadays. =20 We cannot forget to thank the DargonFlyBSD Installer Team, to whom we promised to try DargonFlyBSD sooner or later: ok, we'll do it, as long as you stop talking about KDE. ;-) Availability FreeSBIE 1.1 can be downloaded from one of the mirrors listed on the website: http://www.freesbie.org/?section=3Ddownload-en=20 and on: http://mirrors.freesbie.org/ or using a BitTorrent client: http://torrent.freesbie.org/FreeSBIE-1.1-i386.torrent MD5 checksum of the CD image: MD5 (FreeSBIE-1.1-i386.iso) =3D 61e6433b8ace7c83cee281b731e73f1c _WARNING_: Check the md5 of the mirror you are downloading from. Given the recent Security Advisory, the iso was updated recently. Thus, it is possible that some mirrors still haven't updated to the most recent image file available. Have fun with FreeSBIE, the project team --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBtGSWymi72IiShysRAlyZAKDh8BAvxfUBaOltyad5yX3SsQjogwCgpdWk yJHBANelFDXkwqRLQ39yVK0= =Z3DM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 6 15:55:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8BFA16A4CE; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:55:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from faceman.servitor.co.uk (faceman.servitor.co.uk [80.71.15.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5277343D55; Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:55:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wiggy@servitor.co.uk) Received: from wiggy by faceman.servitor.co.uk with local (Exim 4.30) id 1CbLDe-00035D-4u; Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:56:10 +0000 Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 15:56:10 +0000 From: Paul Robinson To: Dario Freni Message-ID: <20041206155610.GF82193@iconoplex.co.uk> References: <20041206135432.GA38257@cvs.freesbie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20041206135432.GA38257@cvs.freesbie.org> Sender: Paul Robinson X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 13:13:19 +0000 cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: freesbie@gufi.org cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeSBIE 1.1 Release Announcement X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 15:55:56 -0000 On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 02:54:32PM +0100, Dario Freni wrote: > - A renewed series of scripts to support power users in the use of > FreeSBIE 1.1. Could you perhaps give more details? The webpage is a bit sparse. > - An installer to let users install FreeSBIE 1.1 on their hard drives, > thus having a powerful operating system such as FreeBSD, but with all > the personalizations FreeSBIE 1.1 carries. Ahhh. The webpage FAQ still says this is impossible. > The real limit FreeSBIE suffers from is user's fantasy, who will be > able to appreciate its flexibility for many uses. I don't think we want to get into the average BSD user's fantasies... :-) --=20 Paul Robinson http://www.iconoplex.co.uk/=20 "All I know is I'm not a Marxist" - Karl Marx From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 13:31:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5A016A4CE; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 13:31:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blah.sun-fish.com (blah.sun-fish.com [62.176.125.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3EE43D6E; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 13:31:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vladimir.terziev@sun-fish.com) Received: by blah.sun-fish.com (Postfix, from userid 599) id D57E43418B; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:31:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from sun-fish.com (fs.cmotd.com [192.168.3.253]) by blah.sun-fish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBC1C3415A; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:31:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from sun-fish.com (localhost.cmotd.com [127.0.0.1]) by sun-fish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C3E38408; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:27:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from daemon.cmotd.com (daemon.cmotd.com [192.168.3.104]) by sun-fish.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D6B6038404; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:27:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 15:31:17 +0200 From: Vladimir Terziev To: hackers@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20041207153117.536b9399@daemon.cmotd.com> Organization: SunFish Ltd., Sofia X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-unknown-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV Subject: UCARP support for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 13:31:22 -0000 Hi, i need to implement gateway redundancy for our server farm. I found UCARP ( http://www.ucarp.org ) as a potential solution, but it is written it is tested successfully only on Linux, OpenBSD and NetBSD. Did anybody have luck with it under FreeBSD ? Vladimir From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 13:33:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 371CB16A4CE; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 13:33:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F7643D41; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 13:33:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [212.227.126.207] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CbfT6-0003Jb-00; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 14:33:28 +0100 Received: from [217.227.158.40] (helo=donor.laier.local) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CbfT5-0000J0-00; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 14:33:28 +0100 From: Max Laier To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:34:13 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <20041207153117.536b9399@daemon.cmotd.com> In-Reply-To: <20041207153117.536b9399@daemon.cmotd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1707164.RM0QoL5sKV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200412071434.15547.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:61c499deaeeba3ba5be80f48ecc83056 cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UCARP support for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 13:33:32 -0000 --nextPart1707164.RM0QoL5sKV Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 07 December 2004 14:31, Vladimir Terziev wrote: > Hi, > > i need to implement gateway redundancy for our server farm. I found UCARP > ( http://www.ucarp.org ) as a potential solution, but it is written it is > tested successfully only on Linux, OpenBSD and NetBSD. > > Did anybody have luck with it under FreeBSD ? Take a look at: http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/CARP/ I hope to get this commit ready soon (maybe over the holydays). It's *worki= ng*=20 for the default case very well already and peers with OpenBSD like a charm. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart1707164.RM0QoL5sKV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBtbFXXyyEoT62BG0RAq+/AJ9YmK/LgG5VVpuRr0vBGvjxwkNgIgCfYs4x 2hcUxwZuA96E3HNJs3t/jb0= =6vMT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1707164.RM0QoL5sKV-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 15:22:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097AD16A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 15:22:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.dnainternet.net (smtp2.dnainternet.net [62.240.72.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1324543D60 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 15:22:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erik.u@dnainternet.net) Received: from b-204-211.cable.kpy.customers.dnainternet.fi ([212.149.204.211]:56956smtp2.dnainternet.net with ESMTP id S1228730AbULGPWe (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Dec 2004 17:22:34 +0200 Message-ID: <41B5CAB5.9050904@dnainternet.net> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 17:22:29 +0200 From: Erik Udo User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0RC1 (X11/20041205) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dario Freni References: <20041206135432.GA38257@cvs.freesbie.org> In-Reply-To: <20041206135432.GA38257@cvs.freesbie.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeSBIE 1.1 Release Announcement X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 15:22:37 -0000 The last time i checked, FreeSBIE GUI was not to my taste. -I rather use IceWM as my Window Manager, it is small and fast. And still very usable. It's my only choise. -The window manager was in some weird language, i guess it was brasilian or italian. Guess i'll have to do my own FreeSBIEs. Thanks anyway for the scripts that allow me to do my own FreeSBIE. I really like them. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 15:42:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C002D16A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 15:42:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailfe01.swip.net (mailfe01.swip.net [212.247.154.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C2D43D5C for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 15:42:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) X-T2-Posting-ID: Y1QAsIk9O44SO+J/q9KNyQ== Received: from [193.217.204.139] (HELO curly.tele2.no) by mailfe01.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.6) with ESMTP id 233871404; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 16:42:00 +0100 Received: (from root@localhost) by curly.tele2.no (8.12.5/8.12.3) id iB7Fm1QW000470; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 16:48:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 16:47:59 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: David Malone Message-ID: <20041207164759.A283@curly.tele2.no> References: <20041206195709.A332@curly.tele2.no> <20041207093709.GA41269@walton.maths.tcd.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20041207093709.GA41269@walton.maths.tcd.ie>; from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie on Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:37:09AM +0000 cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hostname lookup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 15:42:03 -0000 On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:37:09AM +0000, David Malone wrote: > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 07:57:09PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > I have come across a problem where res_send() goes into a minute-long wait > > loop, waiting for the hostname to be looked up, after a getaddrinfo() call. I > > have captured the packets sent/received, and according to the code the > > query response does not match. Is this a bug in libc or is it a DNS server > > problem? > > It looks like the recursive name server is doing something weird. The nameservers I use are 193.216.1.10 (primary DNS) (nic.daxnet.no) and 193.216.69.10 (secondary DNS) (ns.tele2.no) Output from "dig aaaa www.google.com @193.216.1.10": ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> aaaa www.google.com @193.216.1.10 ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; wrong query name: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; www.google.akadns.net, type = AAAA, class = IN ;; wrong query name: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; www.google.akadns.net, type = AAAA, class = IN ;; res_nsend to server 193.216.1.10 193.216.1.10: Operation timed out Output from "dig a www.google.com @193.216.1.10": ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> a www.google.com @193.216.1.10 ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 4 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 3, AUTHORITY: 13, ADDITIONAL: 12 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; www.google.com, type = A, class = IN ;; ANSWER SECTION: www.google.com. 3m22s IN CNAME www.google.akadns.net. www.google.akadns.net. 2m25s IN A 66.102.9.104 www.google.akadns.net. 2m25s IN A 66.102.9.99 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: . 3d19h35m36s IN NS A.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 3d19h35m36s IN NS H.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 3d19h35m36s IN NS C.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 3d19h35m36s IN NS G.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 3d19h35m36s IN NS F.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 3d19h35m36s IN NS B.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 3d19h35m36s IN NS J.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 3d19h35m36s IN NS K.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 3d19h35m36s IN NS L.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 3d19h35m36s IN NS M.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 3d19h35m36s IN NS I.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 3d19h35m36s IN NS E.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 3d19h35m36s IN NS D.ROOT-SERVERS.net. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: A.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 19h40m39s IN A 198.41.0.4 H.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 19h40m39s IN A 128.63.2.53 C.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 19h40m39s IN A 192.33.4.12 G.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 19h40m39s IN A 192.112.36.4 F.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 19h40m39s IN A 192.5.5.241 B.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 19h40m39s IN A 192.228.79.201 J.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 19h38m52s IN A 192.58.128.30 K.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 19h38m52s IN A 193.0.14.129 L.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 19h38m52s IN A 198.32.64.12 M.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 19h38m52s IN A 202.12.27.33 I.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 19h38m52s IN A 192.36.148.17 E.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 19h40m39s IN A 192.203.230.10 ;; Total query time: 210 msec ;; FROM: curly.tele2.no to SERVER: 193.216.1.10 193.216.1.10 ;; WHEN: Tue Dec 7 16:27:56 2004 ;; MSG SIZE sent: 32 rcvd: 499 > > Do you know what is acting as your recursive DNS server? No. Yours -HPS From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 15:48:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1D116A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 15:48:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19B3B43D60 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 15:48:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie) Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 7 Dec 2004 15:48:05 +0000 (GMT) To: Hans Petter Selasky In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 07 Dec 2004 16:47:59 +0100." <20041207164759.A283@curly.tele2.no> X-Request-Do: Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 15:48:05 +0000 From: David Malone Message-ID: <200412071548.aa63823@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hostname lookup problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 15:48:07 -0000 > > It looks like the recursive name server is doing something weird. > The nameservers I use are 193.216.1.10 (primary DNS) (nic.daxnet.no) and > 193.216.69.10 (secondary DNS) (ns.tele2.no) Wired - when I dig at those two machines they respond with the correct answer. Could there be some sort of transparent-DNS-redirector living between you and the name servers? David. ; <<>> DiG 9.2.3 <<>> aaaa www.google.com @193.216.1.10 ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 60964 ;; flags: qr rd ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 13, ADDITIONAL: 13 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;www.google.com. IN AAAA ;; ANSWER SECTION: www.google.com. 824 IN CNAME www.google.akadns.net. ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: . 328279 IN NS A.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 328279 IN NS H.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 328279 IN NS C.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 328279 IN NS G.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 328279 IN NS F.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 328279 IN NS B.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 328279 IN NS J.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 328279 IN NS K.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 328279 IN NS L.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 328279 IN NS M.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 328279 IN NS I.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 328279 IN NS E.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 328279 IN NS D.ROOT-SERVERS.net. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: A.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 69382 IN A 198.41.0.4 H.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 69382 IN A 128.63.2.53 C.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 69382 IN A 192.33.4.12 G.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 69382 IN A 192.112.36.4 F.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 69382 IN A 192.5.5.241 B.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 69382 IN A 192.228.79.201 J.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 69275 IN A 192.58.128.30 K.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 69275 IN A 193.0.14.129 L.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 69275 IN A 198.32.64.12 M.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 69275 IN A 202.12.27.33 I.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 69275 IN A 192.36.148.17 E.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 69382 IN A 192.203.230.10 D.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 69382 IN A 128.8.10.90 ;; Query time: 62 msec ;; SERVER: 193.216.1.10#53(193.216.1.10) ;; WHEN: Tue Dec 7 15:46:07 2004 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 483 ; <<>> DiG 9.2.3 <<>> aaaa www.google.com @193.216.69.10 ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 15402 ;; flags: qr rd ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 13, ADDITIONAL: 13 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;www.google.com. IN AAAA ;; ANSWER SECTION: www.google.com. 597 IN CNAME www.google.akadns.net. ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: . 512718 IN NS D.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 512718 IN NS E.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 512718 IN NS F.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 512718 IN NS G.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 512718 IN NS H.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 512718 IN NS I.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 512718 IN NS J.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 512718 IN NS K.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 512718 IN NS L.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 512718 IN NS M.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 512718 IN NS A.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 512718 IN NS B.ROOT-SERVERS.net. . 512718 IN NS C.ROOT-SERVERS.net. ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: D.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 598925 IN A 128.8.10.90 E.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 598925 IN A 192.203.230.10 F.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 598925 IN A 192.5.5.241 G.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 598925 IN A 192.112.36.4 H.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 598925 IN A 128.63.2.53 I.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 598925 IN A 192.36.148.17 J.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 598925 IN A 192.58.128.30 K.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 598925 IN A 193.0.14.129 L.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 598925 IN A 198.32.64.12 M.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 598925 IN A 202.12.27.33 A.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 598925 IN A 198.41.0.4 B.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 598925 IN A 192.228.79.201 C.ROOT-SERVERS.net. 598925 IN A 192.33.4.12 ;; Query time: 60 msec ;; SERVER: 193.216.69.10#53(193.216.69.10) ;; WHEN: Tue Dec 7 15:46:34 2004 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 483 From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 16:44:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1B216A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 16:44:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccmmhc92.asp.att.net (sccmmhc92.asp.att.net [204.127.203.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 404FE43D45 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 16:44:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from [10.0.0.4] (12-216-243-9.client.mchsi.com[12.216.243.9]) by sccmmhc92.asp.att.net (sccmmhc92) with ESMTP id <20041207164436m9200aadbje>; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 16:44:41 +0000 Message-ID: <41B5DDF3.80306@math.missouri.edu> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 10:44:35 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20041205 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Simon Burke References: <2d7d2dd204120702483ac36b1a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2d7d2dd204120702483ac36b1a@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-users@uk.freebsd.org Subject: Re: UInaqble to install OpenOffice 1.1.3 from porte, 5.3R X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 16:44:42 -0000 Simon Burke wrote: > Whener i try to install openoffice 1.1 from ports after several hours > of compiling etc, i get the following error message. > > Is openoffice 1.1 port broken? or is it me? > > Im running 5.3R and i've cvsuped ports to get gnome 2.8 running which went fine. > Any ideas? I once had problems like that. I found that the solution was to build jdk14 before building apache-ant and openoffice - jdk14 seemed to work better than linux-jdk14. But this was a while back, and so your problem might be something else. But worth a try. Stephen From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 16:51:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66EE16A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 16:51:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ims-1.prv.ampira.com (ims-1.ampira.com [66.179.231.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2605543D70 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 16:51:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kamalp@acm.org) Received: from [202.142.94.194] (helo=[172.16.3.26]) by ims-1.prv.ampira.com with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CbiVn-00022M-Dr; Tue, 07 Dec 2004 11:48:28 -0500 Message-ID: <41B5DF9B.50501@acm.org> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 22:21:39 +0530 From: "Kamal R. Prasad" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John-Mark Gurney References: <41B20B19.3090204@acm.org> <20041206025126.GO19624@funkthat.com> <41B3F24B.1000903@acm.org> <20041206074237.GP19624@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <20041206074237.GP19624@funkthat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mmap() X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 16:51:48 -0000 John-Mark Gurney wrote: >Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 11:16 +0530: > > >>John-Mark Gurney wrote: >> >> >> >>>Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 00:38 +0530: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>I wrote an mmap() interface for a USB device. But when I made a call to >>>>it using mmap(), I saw that mmap interface is called 3-4 times. The >>>>calls are being made from within mmap() i.e. sys/vm/vm_mmap.c. Can >>>>someone tell me if there is something like a re-try going on for some >>>>reason? >>>> >>>> >>>>From userspace, I called it as >>> >>> >>>>addr = mmap(NULL, 1024, PROT_READ, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0); >>>>The version of OS is Freebsd 5.3(stable). >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>each mmap call will be called whenever the kernel needs to map that >>>specific page.. say you map 16k of your device... it won't map any >>>of the 16k until the first time it is accessed, then it will call the >>>mmap routine for each page as it is accessed... it is also possible that >>>memory for the mappings needs to be reclaimed, at which point those page >>>mappings will be reaped, and your mmap function will be called again when >>>they need to be accessed again.. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Thanks. But then, the mmap'ed() address was yet to be used by the user >>space and I don't see the need for multiple calls to my interface almost >>as if in a while loop. Is there any return value from the mmap() >>interface that could trigger another call? I am returning 0 after >>setting the param to vtophys(kernel virtual address). >> >> > >You are suppose to return 0 on success (that the permission are correct >and doable i.e. that you can write when the write bit is set) and put >the phys adder in paddr... > > > There was a bug in my interface routine which probably resulted in too many calls. Something like *paddr=vtophys(base) instead of *paddr=vtophys(base+offset) should result in lots of calls to the interface. >If you look at sys/vm/device_pager.c, you'll see that on line 139, it >makes sure that the permissions are correct for the entire mapping >(that the user doesn't try to map for writing a read-only mapping)... > >Then later at line 222, is when the actual mapping gets done.. > > > Thanks. My mmap interface is not strict about permissions [just denies PROT_EXEC]. regards -kamal From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 17:52:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2572416A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 17:52:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vsmtp2.tin.it (vsmtp2alice.tin.it [212.216.176.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B25843D5A for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 17:52:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rionda@gufi.org) Received: from kaiser.sig11.org (82.50.116.247) by vsmtp2.tin.it (7.0.027) id 41B458B900099FEB; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 18:52:11 +0100 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kaiser.sig11.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 602E262A9; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 18:52:09 +0100 (CET) From: Matteo Riondato To: Erik Udo In-Reply-To: <41B5CAB5.9050904@dnainternet.net> References: <20041206135432.GA38257@cvs.freesbie.org> <41B5CAB5.9050904@dnainternet.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-G7U0EUvUA3xc2V9EpGxz" Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 18:52:08 +0100 Message-Id: <1102441928.66948.20.camel@kaiser.sig11.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: Dario Freni Subject: Re: FreeSBIE 1.1 Release Announcement X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 17:52:12 -0000 --=-G7U0EUvUA3xc2V9EpGxz Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Il giorno Mar, 07-12-2004 alle 17:22 +0200, Erik Udo ha scritto: > The last time i checked, FreeSBIE GUI > was not to my taste. >=20 > -I rather use IceWM as my Window Manager, it is small and fast. > And still very usable. It's my only choise. Users can now choose between Xfce 4.2-rc and Fluxbox. Look at the screenshots: http://www.freesbie.org/?section=3Dscreenshot-en > -The window manager was in some weird language, > i guess it was brasilian or italian. This issue was solved and now there is no special l10n. > Guess i'll have to do my own FreeSBIEs. Try "our" FreeSBIE first ;) > Thanks anyway for the scripts that allow me to do my own FreeSBIE. > I really like them. Thank you for having tried them :) --=20 Rionda aka Matteo Riondato GUFI Staff Member (http://www.gufi.org) FreeSBIE Developer (http://www.freesbie.org) BSD-FAQ-it Main Developer (http://utenti.gufi.org/~rionda) Sent from: kaiser.sig11.org running FreeBSD-6.0-CURRENT --=-G7U0EUvUA3xc2V9EpGxz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBte3I2Mp4pR7Fa+wRAuIYAJ9NxkW97Hodhk9Y/yb15sfbebQfpwCgzxcM 4U41szy8TIjSZGgMBTLq87o= =+oOE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-G7U0EUvUA3xc2V9EpGxz-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 19:08:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EE816A4CF for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 19:08:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br (vrrp.freebsdbrasil.com.br [200.210.70.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1175243D49 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 19:08:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eksffa@freebsdbrasil.com.br) Received: (qmail 31068 invoked by uid 0); 7 Dec 2004 11:42:00 -0200 Received: from eksffa@freebsdbrasil.com.br by capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.22 Clear:RC:1(200.251.184.62):. Processed in 0.298805 secs); 07 Dec 2004 13:42:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsdbrasil.com.br) (200.251.184.62) by capeta.freebsdbrasil.com.br with SMTP; 7 Dec 2004 11:42:00 -0200 Message-ID: <41B5B321.5020607@freebsdbrasil.com.br> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 11:41:53 -0200 From: Patrick Tracanelli Organization: FreeBSD Brasil LTDA User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031207 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vladimir Terziev References: <20041207153117.536b9399@daemon.cmotd.com> In-Reply-To: <20041207153117.536b9399@daemon.cmotd.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UCARP support for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 19:08:38 -0000 Vladimir Terziev wrote: > Hi, > > i need to implement gateway redundancy for our server farm. I found UCARP ( http://www.ucarp.org ) as a potential solution, but it is written it is tested successfully only on Linux, OpenBSD and NetBSD. > > Did anybody have luck with it under FreeBSD ? Try CARP, not a variant. MLaier's been very successfull at porting it to FreeBSD. The available patches just apply fine against 5.3-RELEASE and it works *very well*. Reffer to OBSD's CARP documentation to get it to work. http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/CARP/ -- Atenciosamente, Patrick Tracanelli FreeBSD Brasil LTDA. The FreeBSD pt_BR Documentation Project http://www.freebsdbrasil.com.br Fone/Fax: (31) 3281-9633 "Long live Hanin Elias, Kim Deal!" From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 19:58:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC1416A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 19:58:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (73.Red-213-97-200.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.200.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AFDD43D49 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 19:58:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org) Received: from scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org (scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org [192.168.100.1]) by mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 704533568B for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 20:58:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 20:58:27 +0100 From: Miguel Mendez To: hackers@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20041207205827.64995395.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.99-gtk2-20041024 (GTK+ 2.4.13; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__7_Dec_2004_20_58_27_+0100_NqPEzjV0eDU.qCiS" Subject: OpenCVS X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 19:58:41 -0000 --Signature=_Tue__7_Dec_2004_20_58_27_+0100_NqPEzjV0eDU.qCiS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi hackers, I've seen the OpenBSD guys have come up with a BSD-licensed CVS[1] that should be focused on security as well as features. Is there any chance that this could make it into FreeBSD's tree as well? Considering GNU's version security track record I think it could be a good move, and it would help testing the code in another production environment. As a side effect, it would please the BSDL advocates by reducing the amount of GNU warez in the base system :) [1] http://www.openbsd.org/opencvs/ Cheers, -- Miguel Mendez | lea gfx_lib(pc),a1 http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org | moveq #0,d0 PGP Key: 0xDC8514F1 | move.l 4.w,a6 Note: All HTML mail goes to /dev/null | jsr -552(a6) --Signature=_Tue__7_Dec_2004_20_58_27_+0100_NqPEzjV0eDU.qCiS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBtgtmnLctrNyFFPERAtU9AJ94rdwlbkJoxNIu5RrL3NhEJdw6RwCgn+sU ultGCVkRO4pWNZ0tPtJwxq8= =cjo0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__7_Dec_2004_20_58_27_+0100_NqPEzjV0eDU.qCiS-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 21:58:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87CF16A4CF for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 21:58:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A300F43D45 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 21:58:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 601A651399; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:04:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:04:12 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Miguel Mendez Message-ID: <20041207220412.GA33656@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041207205827.64995395.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041207205827.64995395.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenCVS X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 21:58:08 -0000 --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 08:58:27PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote: > Hi hackers, >=20 > I've seen the OpenBSD guys have come up with a BSD-licensed CVS[1] that > should be focused on security as well as features. Is there any chance > that this could make it into FreeBSD's tree as well? Considering GNU's > version security track record I think it could be a good move, and it > would help testing the code in another production environment. Have you verified that it does everything it needs to do, and works correctly, in a FreeBSD environment? If not, that's step one. Kris --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBtijcWry0BWjoQKURAtWvAJ9HJTYVlkqMKxSUEpscdDN1RazD+gCdEnax AWPyCAT9Rkwa7khtR4R7pzo= =Cv5p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 22:13:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EFC116A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:13:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBD343D5F for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:13:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D770B511AE; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:20:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:20:14 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jordan Hubbard Message-ID: <20041207222014.GA47020@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041207205827.64995395.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <20041207220412.GA33656@xor.obsecurity.org> <6E40E93D-489C-11D9-A254-000393DACFAC@brierdr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6E40E93D-489C-11D9-A254-000393DACFAC@brierdr.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: OpenCVS X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: hackers@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 22:13:57 -0000 --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:07:48PM -0800, Jordan Hubbard wrote: > One might also ask the begged question, namely whether or not it makes=20 > any sense to invest time and effort into a transition to just another=20 > implementation of cvs vs investing it in moving to something else, like= =20 > SVN. No, I'm really not trying to re-ignite the "should we move to=20 > p4/svn/arch/...?" war, I'm simply saying it might be best to decide=20 > here and now that should any SCM transition ever occur, it should only=20 > be when the bang-for-buck factor reaches some significant threshold=20 > over what's currently available now. unsubscribe --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBtiyeWry0BWjoQKURAkj2AKCbiIJ7ZSmAt7jlYaHNgzhSjCeIkACeNBIQ Bz9sh7eeFx8Rnj75Rv//26s= =2tsJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 22:19:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F2D16A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:19:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail2.speakeasy.net (mail2.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258D443D5A for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:19:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: (qmail 20516 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2004 22:19:20 -0000 Received: from gate.funkthat.com (HELO hydrogen.funkthat.com) ([69.17.45.168]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 7 Dec 2004 22:19:20 -0000 Received: from hydrogen.funkthat.com (ktgbsh@localhost.funkthat.com [127.0.0.1])iB7MJKGH050648; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:19:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: (from jmg@localhost) by hydrogen.funkthat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id iB7MJJEG050647; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:19:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:19:19 -0800 From: John-Mark Gurney To: "Kamal R. Prasad" Message-ID: <20041207221919.GQ19624@funkthat.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Kamal R. Prasad" , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <41B20B19.3090204@acm.org> <20041206025126.GO19624@funkthat.com> <41B3F24B.1000903@acm.org> <20041206074237.GP19624@funkthat.com> <41B5DF9B.50501@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41B5DF9B.50501@acm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386 X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 EC EF F8 AE ED A7 31 96 7A 22 B3 D8 56 36 F4 X-Files: The truth is out there X-URL: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/ X-Resume: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/resume.html cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mmap() X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 22:19:21 -0000 Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 22:21 +0530: > There was a bug in my interface routine which probably resulted in too > many calls. > Something like *paddr=vtophys(base) instead of > *paddr=vtophys(base+offset) should result in lots of calls to the interface. Just remeber that vtophys is not a supported interface in HEAD, (if it still works, it will probably be removed shortly).. Also, vtophys only works on limited archs, like i386 and alpha... -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not." From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 22:21:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39D616A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:21:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6490E43D5A for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:21:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (freebie.xs4all.nl [213.84.32.253]) iB7MLF9Y070701; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 23:21:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: from freebie.xs4all.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id iB7MLF0j074752; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 23:21:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wb@freebie.xs4all.nl) Received: (from wb@localhost) by freebie.xs4all.nl (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iB7MLFFA074751; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 23:21:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wb) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 23:21:15 +0100 From: Wilko Bulte To: "Kamal R. Prasad" , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041207222115.GA74736@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <41B20B19.3090204@acm.org> <20041206025126.GO19624@funkthat.com> <41B3F24B.1000903@acm.org> <20041206074237.GP19624@funkthat.com> <41B5DF9B.50501@acm.org> <20041207221919.GQ19624@funkthat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041207221919.GQ19624@funkthat.com> X-OS: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Re: mmap() X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 22:21:20 -0000 On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:19:19PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote.. > Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 22:21 +0530: > > There was a bug in my interface routine which probably resulted in too > > many calls. > > Something like *paddr=vtophys(base) instead of > > *paddr=vtophys(base+offset) should result in lots of calls to the interface. > > Just remeber that vtophys is not a supported interface in HEAD, (if it > still works, it will probably be removed shortly).. Also, vtophys only > works on limited archs, like i386 and alpha... s/limited/some/ -- Wilko Bulte wilko@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 22:36:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679B216A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:36:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.server.rpi.edu (smtp1.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21A943D46 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:36:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp1.server.rpi.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iB7MaaIV001599; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 17:36:38 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20041207205827.64995395.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> References: <20041207205827.64995395.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 17:36:35 -0500 To: Miguel Mendez , hackers@freebsd.org From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-RPI-SA-Score: undef - spam-scanning disabled X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) Subject: Re: OpenCVS X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 22:36:44 -0000 At 8:58 PM +0100 12/7/04, Miguel Mendez wrote: >Hi hackers, > >I've seen the OpenBSD guys have come up with a BSD-licensed CVS[1] >that should be focused on security as well as features. Is there >any chance that this could make it into FreeBSD's tree as well? >[1] http://www.openbsd.org/opencvs/ From that web page: OpenCVS released soon Certainly FreeBSD will be interested in seeing how well OpenCVS works, but we like to wait until the code is released before we make any claims about when it will show up in the base system of FreeBSD. I know it's been slash-dotted and all, but it only seems fair that we wait for the actual source-code from the people who are apparently still working on it... That said, we obviously prefer code with a BSD license. So it is reasonable to think that some form of OpenCVS might eventually show up in FreeBSD, the same way that OpenSSH and PF have. But there is no way we can guess at a timetable for that now, when even OpenBSD has not shipped a release with OpenCVS yet! -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 23:29:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C50216A4CE; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 23:29:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr (postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14DF43D1D; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 23:29:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (unknown [82.233.239.98]) by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38172FC42; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:47:26 +0100 (CET) Received: by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8FF65412C; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:45:55 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:45:54 +0100 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: Vladimir Terziev Message-ID: <20041207214554.GK79919@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20041207153117.536b9399@daemon.cmotd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041207153117.536b9399@daemon.cmotd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UCARP support for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 23:29:26 -0000 > i need to implement gateway redundancy for our server farm. I found > UCARP ( http://www.ucarp.org ) as a potential solution, but it is > written it is tested successfully only on Linux, OpenBSD and NetBSD. > > Did anybody have luck with it under FreeBSD ? I've just discovered UCARP thanks to you. It didn't have time to give it a try, however I looked at the documentation. It seems that UCARP is a userland tool and thus should work quite well on FreeBSD, more especially if it works on other BSD systems. I think now that the 'U' in UCARP means "Userland" :-). If you successfully run it on FreeBSD-4, it would be nice to keep us informed, at least for the archives. Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen jeremie@le-hen.org From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 00:10:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C64616A4D0; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 00:10:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kurush.osdn.org.ua (external.osdn.org.ua [212.40.34.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 438AF43D75; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 00:10:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from never@kurush.osdn.org.ua) Received: from kurush.osdn.org.ua (never@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kurush.osdn.org.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iB80AAuO084691; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 02:10:10 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from never@kurush.osdn.org.ua) Received: (from never@localhost) by kurush.osdn.org.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iB80A3vh084663; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 02:10:04 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from never) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 02:10:02 +0200 From: Alexandr Kovalenko To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek Message-ID: <20041208001001.GC81328@nevermind.kiev.ua> References: <41A4FD60.4050501@jonny.eng.br> <20041125224547.GB7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <41A6B76F.4020101@jonny.eng.br> <20041126082340.GC7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <41A78A47.3050309@jonny.eng.br> <20041128202759.GF7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <41AB37B8.7060303@jonny.eng.br> <41AB9457.6020601@jonny.eng.br> <20041129225925.GT7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041129225925.GT7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: Jo?o Carlos Mendes Lu?s Subject: Re: Hand on gmirror (Was: Re: gmirror bugs, how many?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:10:19 -0000 Hello, Pawel Jakub Dawidek! On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 11:59:25PM +0100, you wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 07:27:51PM -0200, Jo?o Carlos Mendes Lu?s wrote: > +> I finally got the system to boot with gmirror fully enabled. But I got > +> this during boot: > +> > +> > +> GEOM_MIRROR: Device vol0 created (id=3592859320). > +> GEOM_MIRROR: Device vol0: provider ad0s1 detected. > +> GEOM_MIRROR: Device vol0: provider ad1s1 detected. > +> GEOM_MIRROR: Device vol0: provider ad1s1 activated. > +> GEOM_MIRROR: Cannot update metadata on disk ad0s1 (error=1). > +> GEOM_MIRROR: Device vol0: provider ad0s1 activated. > +> GEOM_MIRROR: Device vol0: provider mirror/vol0 launched. > +> GEOM_MIRROR: Cannot update metadata on disk ad0s1 (error=1). > +> GEOM_MIRROR: Device vol0: provider ad0s1 disconnected. > > This is known race, which is already fixed in HEAD. I want to commit it > soon. Any plans on backporting it to RELENG_5 (RELENG_5_3 maybe?)? To be on original topic - is there any way to make a mirror from live system? I mean I have running FreeBSD on da0 and I want to make a gmirror on it (I'm planning to add second drive soon). How to avoid those disklabel warnings correctly? -- NEVE-RIPE, will build world for food Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group http://uafug.org.ua/ From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 05:12:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3255F16A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 05:12:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from a.mx.ict1.everquick.net (a.mx.ict1.everquick.net [67.67.61.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E224043D2D for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 05:12:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eddy+public+spam@noc.everquick.net) Received: from a.mx.ict1.everquick.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) iB85CHJI018162 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 05:12:17 GMT X-Everquick-No-Abuse-1: Report any email abuse to or X-Everquick-No-Abuse-2: call +1 (785) 865-5885. Please be sure to reference X-Everquick-No-Abuse-3: the Message-Id and include GMT timestamps. Received: from localhost (eddy@localhost)iB85CGsR018159 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 05:12:16 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: a.mx.ict1.everquick.net: eddy owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 05:12:16 +0000 (GMT) From: "Edward B. Dreger" X-X-Sender: eddy@a.mx.ict1.everquick.net To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: kernel not linking (4.10-R + GCC-3.3.5 + binutils-2.15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 05:12:17 -0000 Greetings, Apologies in advance if this is better suited for another forum. I have a mostly-stock 4.10-RELEASE system, save for GCC 3.3.5 and binutils 2.15. After bootstrapping the GCC/binutils builds with stock versions, I self-built the new GCC and binutils. I can compile and link most software without trouble. Building a kernel apparently works fine[1] until the linking stage, when I receive linking kernel ld: target elf32-i386 not found *** Error code 1 Any hints on how I've managed to screw up binutils? [1] A few source files required slight modifications (mostly re preprocessor stringification and switch statements), and I removed -fformat-extensions from CWARNFLAGS in bsd.kern.mk. I'd bet money that these aren't the problems; I only mention it because I don't want anyone to try replacing their toolchain and getting highly annoyed. TIA, Eddy -- Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/ A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/ Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita ________________________________________________________________________ DO NOT send mail to the following addresses: davidc@brics.com -*- jfconmaapaq@intc.net -*- sam@everquick.net Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 05:15:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723E716A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 05:15:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ims-1.prv.ampira.com (ims-1.ampira.com [66.179.231.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB3743D45 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 05:15:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kamalp@acm.org) Received: from [202.142.94.194] (helo=[172.16.3.26]) by ims-1.prv.ampira.com with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Cbu7e-0004HE-VM; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:12:20 -0500 Message-ID: <41B68DF5.6070708@acm.org> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 10:45:33 +0530 From: "Kamal R. Prasad" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wilko Bulte References: <41B20B19.3090204@acm.org> <20041206025126.GO19624@funkthat.com> <41B3F24B.1000903@acm.org> <20041206074237.GP19624@funkthat.com> <41B5DF9B.50501@acm.org> <20041207221919.GQ19624@funkthat.com> <20041207222115.GA74736@freebie.xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <20041207222115.GA74736@freebie.xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mmap() X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 05:15:39 -0000 Wilko Bulte wrote: >On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:19:19PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote.. > > >>Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 22:21 +0530: >> >> >>>There was a bug in my interface routine which probably resulted in too >>>many calls. >>>Something like *paddr=vtophys(base) instead of >>>*paddr=vtophys(base+offset) should result in lots of calls to the interface. >>> >>> >>Just remeber that vtophys is not a supported interface in HEAD, (if it >>still works, it will probably be removed shortly).. Also, vtophys only >>works on limited archs, like i386 and alpha... >> >> > >s/limited/some/ > > > So what would be the equivalent supported interface in HEAD? BTW -man (4) usb probably needs more info than present. thanks -kamal From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 08:23:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A5B16A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:23:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bsdhosting.net (bsdhosting.net [65.39.221.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 62BC843D45 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:23:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhopper@bsdhosting.net) Received: (qmail 22788 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2004 08:23:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (jhopper@bsdhosting.net@65.39.221.113) by bsdhosting.net with SMTP; 8 Dec 2004 08:23:20 -0000 From: Justin Hopper To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:23:24 -0800 Message-Id: <1102494204.1072.278.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Multiple IPs in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:23:28 -0000 Two questions: 1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon? 2) Has anyone used Pawel's multiple IP patch in a semi-production environment? Can anyone report any problems or issues that they've had with it? Thanks. -- Justin Hopper UNIX Systems Engineer BSDHosting.net Hosting Division of Digital Oasys Inc. http://www.bsdhosting.net From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 08:26:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA15216A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:26:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E9A43D49 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:26:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aaron.glenn@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so444104rng for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:26:04 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=etK/EBC/uzK5uw8wLh6KUkbWxAtCSmRFmM29mT1t7V3iK0Ck9BjLvuJMkonBP/E9zcFuo7bqlHplOb8J9MutM4yb4RvGxDkORADMuabTMUuOZjsoDsxt3qKLcgpd8FvL1kD5KKhh+Jw/9zdOUv63HJQUCuMdKSULc2j2YtC+iXk= Received: by 10.38.59.80 with SMTP id h80mr321062rna; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:26:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.151.63 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 00:26:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <18f601940412080026ee1d85c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 00:26:03 -0800 From: Aaron Glenn To: Justin Hopper In-Reply-To: <1102494204.1072.278.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1102494204.1072.278.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple IPs in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Aaron Glenn List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:26:05 -0000 On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:23:24 -0800, Justin Hopper wrote: > Two questions: > > 1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails > binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon? Someone hasn't read up on 5.x... > 2) Has anyone used Pawel's multiple IP patch in a semi-production > environment? Can anyone report any problems or issues that they've had > with it? I toyed with it at home without a single issue. Still, in a hosting environment I'd use 5.x Regards, aaron.glenn From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 08:49:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B95716A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:49:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bsdhosting.net (bsdhosting.net [65.39.221.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD56743D2F for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:49:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhopper@bsdhosting.net) Received: (qmail 26473 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2004 08:49:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (jhopper@bsdhosting.net@65.39.221.113) by bsdhosting.net with SMTP; 8 Dec 2004 08:49:25 -0000 From: Justin Hopper To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <18f601940412080026ee1d85c@mail.gmail.com> References: <1102494204.1072.278.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <18f601940412080026ee1d85c@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:49:29 -0800 Message-Id: <1102495769.1072.288.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Multiple IPs in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:49:32 -0000 On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 00:26 -0800, Aaron Glenn wrote: > On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:23:24 -0800, Justin Hopper > wrote: > > Two questions: > > > > 1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails > > binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon? > > Someone hasn't read up on 5.x... I'm confused. I've been running and developing on 5.x for a few months now, and I'm pretty sure that multiple IPs are not supported (it's always possible that I've missed something...). I was curious if Poul or anyone else had plans to put the functionality into the base system in the near future? > > 2) Has anyone used Pawel's multiple IP patch in a semi-production > > environment? Can anyone report any problems or issues that they've had > > with it? > > I toyed with it at home without a single issue. Still, in a hosting > environment I'd use 5.x The patch from Pawel that I was looking at was "against-CURRENT", so I was assuming that was for 5, and not some 4.x-CURRENT branch? -- Justin Hopper UNIX Systems Engineer BSDHosting.net Hosting Division of Digital Oasys Inc. http://www.bsdhosting.net From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 08:53:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5661016A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:53:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from darkness.comp.waw.pl (darkness.comp.waw.pl [195.117.238.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534E743D64 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:53:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pjd@darkness.comp.waw.pl) Received: by darkness.comp.waw.pl (Postfix, from userid 1009) id 6F2A2ACC29; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:53:06 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:53:06 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek To: Alexandr Kovalenko Message-ID: <20041208085306.GE1130@darkness.comp.waw.pl> References: <41A4FD60.4050501@jonny.eng.br> <20041125224547.GB7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <41A6B76F.4020101@jonny.eng.br> <20041126082340.GC7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <41A78A47.3050309@jonny.eng.br> <20041128202759.GF7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <41AB37B8.7060303@jonny.eng.br> <41AB9457.6020601@jonny.eng.br> <20041129225925.GT7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20041208001001.GC81328@nevermind.kiev.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="phCU5ROyZO6kBE05" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041208001001.GC81328@nevermind.kiev.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-PGP-Key-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/pjd.asc X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RC2 i386 cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: Jo?o Carlos Mendes Lu?s Subject: Re: Hand on gmirror (Was: Re: gmirror bugs, how many?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:53:18 -0000 --phCU5ROyZO6kBE05 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 02:10:02AM +0200, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: +> Hello, Pawel Jakub Dawidek! +> >=20 +> > This is known race, which is already fixed in HEAD. I want to commit it +> > soon. +>=20 +> Any plans on backporting it to RELENG_5 (RELENG_5_3 maybe?)? I'm going to MFC it probably this weekend to RELENG_5, RELENG_5_3 is closed for changes like this one. +> To be on original topic - is there any way to make a mirror from live +> system? I mean I have running FreeBSD on da0 and I want to make a +> gmirror on it (I'm planning to add second drive soon). How to avoid +> those disklabel warnings correctly? You still need to reboot. The whole instruction you should find in freebsd-geom@ mailing list archives, I wrote about this few times, AFAIR. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --phCU5ROyZO6kBE05 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBtsDyForvXbEpPzQRArG+AKD0l1OU1zzAi82QYmW9UzmHMb3gWACfU15q aKAekieAh0KMuXqXwzsnfA0= =9LmU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --phCU5ROyZO6kBE05-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 09:05:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7451116A4CF for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:05:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail3.speakeasy.net (mail3.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DBC843D55 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:05:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: (qmail 30356 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2004 09:05:06 -0000 Received: from gate.funkthat.com (HELO hydrogen.funkthat.com) ([69.17.45.168]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Dec 2004 09:05:05 -0000 Received: from hydrogen.funkthat.com (fwnetw@localhost.funkthat.com [127.0.0.1])iB8955GH064055; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 01:05:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: (from jmg@localhost) by hydrogen.funkthat.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id iB89548p064054; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 01:05:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 01:05:04 -0800 From: John-Mark Gurney To: "Kamal R. Prasad" Message-ID: <20041208090504.GT19624@funkthat.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Kamal R. Prasad" , Wilko Bulte , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <41B20B19.3090204@acm.org> <20041206025126.GO19624@funkthat.com> <41B3F24B.1000903@acm.org> <20041206074237.GP19624@funkthat.com> <41B5DF9B.50501@acm.org> <20041207221919.GQ19624@funkthat.com> <20041207222115.GA74736@freebie.xs4all.nl> <41B68DF5.6070708@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41B68DF5.6070708@acm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386 X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 EC EF F8 AE ED A7 31 96 7A 22 B3 D8 56 36 F4 X-Files: The truth is out there X-URL: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/ X-Resume: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/resume.html cc: Wilko Bulte cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mmap() X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 09:05:06 -0000 Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:45 +0530: > Wilko Bulte wrote: > > >On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:19:19PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote.. > > > >>Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 22:21 +0530: > >> > >>>There was a bug in my interface routine which probably resulted in too > >>>many calls. > >>>Something like *paddr=vtophys(base) instead of > >>>*paddr=vtophys(base+offset) should result in lots of calls to the > >>>interface. > >>> > >>Just remeber that vtophys is not a supported interface in HEAD, (if it > >>still works, it will probably be removed shortly).. Also, vtophys only > >>works on limited archs, like i386 and alpha... > > > >s/limited/some/ > > So what would be the equivalent supported interface in HEAD? bus_dma(9) It's a bit more complicated though... but with out it, you won't be able to get your driver working on sparc64... > BTW -man (4) usb probably needs more info than present. I'm sure it does, feel free to send-pr patches.. :) -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not." From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 09:40:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D63D16A4CE; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:40:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kurush.osdn.org.ua (external.osdn.org.ua [212.40.34.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0AB043D5F; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:40:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from never@kurush.osdn.org.ua) Received: from kurush.osdn.org.ua (never@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kurush.osdn.org.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iB89ejUb010889; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:40:45 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from never@kurush.osdn.org.ua) Received: (from never@localhost) by kurush.osdn.org.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id iB89eic7010886; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:40:44 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from never) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:40:44 +0200 From: Alexandr Kovalenko To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek Message-ID: <20041208094044.GB8042@nevermind.kiev.ua> References: <20041125224547.GB7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <41A6B76F.4020101@jonny.eng.br> <20041126082340.GC7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <41A78A47.3050309@jonny.eng.br> <20041128202759.GF7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <41AB37B8.7060303@jonny.eng.br> <41AB9457.6020601@jonny.eng.br> <20041129225925.GT7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20041208001001.GC81328@nevermind.kiev.ua> <20041208085306.GE1130@darkness.comp.waw.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041208085306.GE1130@darkness.comp.waw.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org cc: Jo?o Carlos Mendes Lu?s Subject: Re: Hand on gmirror (Was: Re: gmirror bugs, how many?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 09:40:49 -0000 Hello, Pawel Jakub Dawidek! On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:53:06AM +0100, you wrote: > On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 02:10:02AM +0200, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: > +> Hello, Pawel Jakub Dawidek! > +> > > +> > This is known race, which is already fixed in HEAD. I want to commit it > +> > soon. > +> > +> Any plans on backporting it to RELENG_5 (RELENG_5_3 maybe?)? > > I'm going to MFC it probably this weekend to RELENG_5, RELENG_5_3 is > closed for changes like this one. Thanks a lot! > +> To be on original topic - is there any way to make a mirror from live > +> system? I mean I have running FreeBSD on da0 and I want to make a > +> gmirror on it (I'm planning to add second drive soon). How to avoid > +> those disklabel warnings correctly? > > You still need to reboot. The whole instruction you should find in > freebsd-geom@ mailing list archives, I wrote about this few times, AFAIR. Could you please remember subject of that thread? I was able to make a gmirror on live system using kern.geom.debugflags=16, but problem with disklabel remains. -- NEVE-RIPE, will build world for food Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group http://uafug.org.ua/ From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 09:58:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B0416A4CE; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:58:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from blah.sun-fish.com (blah.sun-fish.com [62.176.125.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42EE43D75; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:58:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vladimir.terziev@sun-fish.com) Received: by blah.sun-fish.com (Postfix, from userid 599) id C01C134183; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:58:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from sun-fish.com (fs.cmotd.com [192.168.3.253]) by blah.sun-fish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E6B34164; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:58:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from sun-fish.com (localhost.cmotd.com [127.0.0.1]) by sun-fish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637223840A; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:58:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from daemon.cmotd.com (daemon.cmotd.com [192.168.3.104]) by sun-fish.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BBDB38404; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:58:26 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:58:49 +0200 From: Vladimir Terziev To: Jeremie Le Hen Message-Id: <20041208115849.06de4961@daemon.cmotd.com> In-Reply-To: <20041207214554.GK79919@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20041207153117.536b9399@daemon.cmotd.com> <20041207214554.GK79919@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Organization: SunFish Ltd., Sofia X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.10claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-unknown-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AV-Checked: ClamAV cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UCARP support for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 09:58:51 -0000 Hi Jeremie, I've managed to build UCARP binary on FreeBSD 4.x without any problem. Now i have to test it how good it works. Vladimir On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:45:54 +0100 Jeremie Le Hen wrote: > > i need to implement gateway redundancy for our server farm. I found > > UCARP ( http://www.ucarp.org ) as a potential solution, but it is > > written it is tested successfully only on Linux, OpenBSD and NetBSD. > > > > Did anybody have luck with it under FreeBSD ? > > I've just discovered UCARP thanks to you. It didn't have time to give > it a try, however I looked at the documentation. It seems that UCARP > is a userland tool and thus should work quite well on FreeBSD, more > especially if it works on other BSD systems. > > I think now that the 'U' in UCARP means "Userland" :-). > > If you successfully run it on FreeBSD-4, it would be nice to keep us > informed, at least for the archives. > > Regards, > -- > Jeremie Le Hen > jeremie@le-hen.org From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 10:01:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8738C16A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:01:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from annibale.willystudios.com (annibale.willystudios.com [216.120.241.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0939443D67 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:01:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stucchi@willystudios.com) Received: by annibale.willystudios.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 593CA4F470; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:57:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from max.willystudios.com (host153-125.pool80116.interbusiness.it [80.116.125.153]) by annibale.willystudios.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C734F469; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:57:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by max.willystudios.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 31F0E323; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:02:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:02:57 +0100 From: Massimiliano Stucchi To: Matteo Riondato Message-ID: <20041208100257.GF73030@willystudios.com> References: <20041206135432.GA38257@cvs.freesbie.org> <41B5CAB5.9050904@dnainternet.net> <1102441928.66948.20.camel@kaiser.sig11.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QNDPHrPUIc00TOLW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1102441928.66948.20.camel@kaiser.sig11.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE X-URL: http://www.willystudios.com/max/ X-Organization: WillyStudios.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.500000, version=0.92.8 cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: Erik Udo cc: Dario Freni Subject: Re: FreeSBIE 1.1 Release Announcement X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: stucchi@willystudios.com List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 10:01:38 -0000 --QNDPHrPUIc00TOLW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 071204, 18:52, Matteo Riondato wrote: > Il giorno Mar, 07-12-2004 alle 17:22 +0200, Erik Udo ha scritto: > > The last time i checked, FreeSBIE GUI > > was not to my taste. > >=20 > > -I rather use IceWM as my Window Manager, it is small and fast. > > And still very usable. It's my only choise. >=20 > Users can now choose between Xfce 4.2-rc and Fluxbox. Look at the > screenshots: > http://www.freesbie.org/?section=3Dscreenshot-en I would like to also point out the FreeSBIE Manual, located at http://www.freesbie.org/manual/ where we describe each environment you can choose, and the possibilities offered by the FreeSBIE framework. > > -The window manager was in some weird language, > > i guess it was brasilian or italian. >=20 > This issue was solved and now there is no special l10n. Yes, that was an error carried by the first release. Ciao ! --=20 Massimiliano Stucchi WillyStudios.com stucchi@willystudios.com Http://www.willystudios.com/max/ --QNDPHrPUIc00TOLW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBttFRFwcpJfdZDoERAt3hAJ41yY7k9pdgFOhGEbYSo/Py6dEFBACcDQsS GLJw1AJzQZU/hr+h+FQpbKI= =YPaQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QNDPHrPUIc00TOLW-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 10:20:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D707816A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:20:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from darkness.comp.waw.pl (darkness.comp.waw.pl [195.117.238.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7049443D46 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:20:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pjd@darkness.comp.waw.pl) Received: by darkness.comp.waw.pl (Postfix, from userid 1009) id 7BAE2AC956; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:19:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:19:58 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek To: Alexandr Kovalenko Message-ID: <20041208101958.GF1130@darkness.comp.waw.pl> References: <41A6B76F.4020101@jonny.eng.br> <20041126082340.GC7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <41A78A47.3050309@jonny.eng.br> <20041128202759.GF7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <41AB37B8.7060303@jonny.eng.br> <41AB9457.6020601@jonny.eng.br> <20041129225925.GT7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20041208001001.GC81328@nevermind.kiev.ua> <20041208085306.GE1130@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20041208094044.GB8042@nevermind.kiev.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s5/bjXLgkIwAv6Hi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041208094044.GB8042@nevermind.kiev.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-PGP-Key-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/pjd.asc X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RC2 i386 cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org cc: Jo?o Carlos Mendes Lu?s Subject: Re: Hand on gmirror (Was: Re: gmirror bugs, how many?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 10:20:01 -0000 --s5/bjXLgkIwAv6Hi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:40:44AM +0200, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: +> > +> To be on original topic - is there any way to make a mirror from li= ve +> > +> system? I mean I have running FreeBSD on da0 and I want to make a +> > +> gmirror on it (I'm planning to add second drive soon). How to avoid +> > +> those disklabel warnings correctly? +> >=20 +> > You still need to reboot. The whole instruction you should find in +> > freebsd-geom@ mailing list archives, I wrote about this few times, AFA= IR. +>=20 +> Could you please remember subject of that thread? +>=20 +> I was able to make a gmirror on live system using +> kern.geom.debugflags=3D16, but problem with disklabel remains. You cannot do this on live system, because you need to mount root file system on top of the mirror and remounting root file system is not possible. You need to create the mirror on 2nd disk first, etc. Even if you store metadata on disk (with debugflags=3D16), changes will not be updated on 2nd disk, because I/O requests go to the disk provider, not to the mirror provider. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --s5/bjXLgkIwAv6Hi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBttVOForvXbEpPzQRAsFqAJ9KWllG5v/nMFeC4VQcatscNtnV7gCcC73p 5D3SUblOWdhTIXd9OAiRNsA= =I9iA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s5/bjXLgkIwAv6Hi-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 10:51:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16BE16A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:51:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpq1.home.nl (smtpq1.home.nl [213.51.128.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A7E43D6D for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 10:51:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dodell@sitetronics.com) Received: from [213.51.128.132] (port=60417 helo=smtp1.home.nl) by smtpq1.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CbzPj-0000OM-K4; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:51:19 +0100 Received: from cc740438-a.deven1.ov.home.nl ([82.75.136.183]:3468 helo=[192.168.1.42]) by smtp1.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CbzPa-0003yl-5j; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:51:10 +0100 Message-ID: <41B6DC9E.6020300@sitetronics.com> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:51:10 +0100 From: "Devon H. O'Dell" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Justin Hopper References: <1102494204.1072.278.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <18f601940412080026ee1d85c@mail.gmail.com> <1102495769.1072.288.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> In-Reply-To: <1102495769.1072.288.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple IPs in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 10:51:22 -0000 Justin Hopper wrote: > On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 00:26 -0800, Aaron Glenn wrote: > >>On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:23:24 -0800, Justin Hopper >> wrote: >> >>>Two questions: >>> >>>1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails >>>binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon? >> >>Someone hasn't read up on 5.x... > > > I'm confused. I've been running and developing on 5.x for a few months > now, and I'm pretty sure that multiple IPs are not supported (it's > always possible that I've missed something...). I was curious if Poul > or anyone else had plans to put the functionality into the base system > in the near future? Correct. 5.x does not have this feature; Aaron, please read for yourself before you are rude towards others. > >>>2) Has anyone used Pawel's multiple IP patch in a semi-production >>>environment? Can anyone report any problems or issues that they've had >>>with it? >> >>I toyed with it at home without a single issue. Still, in a hosting >>environment I'd use 5.x Are you sure you toyed with it? And in a production environment, I'd still recommend 4.10. > > The patch from Pawel that I was looking at was "against-CURRENT", so I > was assuming that was for 5, and not some 4.x-CURRENT branch? Correct. Pawel's patches haven't been incorporated for various reasons, but I'm not a committer, so I won't give them. There have been several threads on the list questioning this over the last year and a half. I have run the MIP patch and found no problems. I believe there is a race condition that it introduces, but that could be irrelevant / incorrect information. I'll leave it up to PJD and others to provide any more information if it is necessary and to you to search the lists for the other relevant threads. Kind regards, Devon H. O'Dell From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 08:56:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B202816A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:56:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.devrandom.org.uk (mail.devrandom.org.uk [84.92.10.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D225443D53 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:56:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from howells@kde.org) Received: from localhost (frodo [192.168.1.8]) by mail.devrandom.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A960825634D for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:56:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.devrandom.org.uk ([192.168.1.8]) by localhost (frodo.devrandom.org.uk [192.168.1.8]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 71868-09 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:56:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (unknown [192.168.1.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.devrandom.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8EC256317 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:56:15 +0000 (GMT) From: Chris Howells Organization: K Desktop Environment To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 08:55:59 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.50 References: <1102494204.1072.278.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> In-Reply-To: <1102494204.1072.278.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1153796.QXX0LV2LUt"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200412080856.10196.howells@kde.org> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at devrandom.org.uk X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 13:00:07 +0000 Subject: Re: Multiple IPs in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 08:56:30 -0000 --nextPart1153796.QXX0LV2LUt Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday 08 December 2004 08:23, Justin Hopper wrote: > 1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails > binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon? 'ifconfig alias' =2D-=20 Cheers, Chris Howells -- chris@chrishowells.co.uk, howells@kde.org Web: http://chrishowells.co.uk, PGP ID: 0x33795A2C KDE/Qt/C++/PHP Developer: http://www.kde.org --nextPart1153796.QXX0LV2LUt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBBtsGqF8Iu1zN5WiwRAgnhAJ44EELmeF85wP4E+gpv6KAaPSbwgwCffIKB K83yySVH9NjGgAeadfJ7gWI= =SsRl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1153796.QXX0LV2LUt-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 09:49:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E84516A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:49:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from delight.idiom.com (delight.idiom.com [216.240.32.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72FA643D3F for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:49:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwm@mired.org) Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1]) by delight.idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71C21C6D11 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 01:49:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mired.org (mwm@idiom [216.240.32.1]) by idiom.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id iB89nvIq023492 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 01:49:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mwm@mired.org) Received: (qmail 4224 invoked by uid 100); 8 Dec 2004 09:49:57 -0000 Received: by guru.mired.org (tmda-sendmail, from uid 100); Wed, 08 Dec 2004 03:49:57 -0600 (CST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16822.52804.874822.77474@guru.mired.org> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 03:49:56 -0600 To: "Bagus" In-Reply-To: References: <20041206195709.A332@curly.tele2.no> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid X-Primary-Address: mwm@mired.org X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`; h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) From: Mike Meyer X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 13:00:07 +0000 cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: finding and mounting a fat partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 09:49:59 -0000 In , Bagus typed: > > Hi, > > When I built my box, I split the disk into two partitions, one 8 gig > partition for freebsd and one 2 gig fat one in case I ever wanted to change > my mind and install a different operating system on the box. Of course, I've > never wanted to do that, but I would like to now use that 2 gigs of > diskspace for stuff now if I could. > > I found this little bit of information: http://www.freebsdhowtos.com/61.html > but when I run a df, I don't see it listed, so I don't know what the device > is called. > > Am I screwed? Any ideas? You want to use fdisk to find the partition, and change it's type to FreeBSD. I've got a two-partition disk for the same reason, and it looks like: guru# fdisk /dev/da1 /datmp/redhat ******* Working on device /dev/da1 ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=1777 heads=244 sectors/track=41 (10004 blks/cyl) Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=1777 heads=244 sectors/track=41 (10004 blks/cyl) Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: sysid 165,(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 41, size 13585391 (6633 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; end: cyl 1023/ head 243/ sector 41 The data for partition 2 is: sysid 165,(FreeBSD/NetBSD/386BSD) start 13585432, size 4191676 (2046 Meg), flag 0 beg: cyl 1023/ head 255/ sector 63; end: cyl 1023/ head 243/ sector 41 The data for partition 3 is: The data for partition 4 is: Note that's two slices, partition 1 and partition 2. The second one has one partition on it, /dev/da1s2a. The first one has three partitions on it, as disklabel will show you: guru# disklabel /dev/da1s1 /datmp/redhat # /dev/da1s1: type: SCSI disk: da1s1 label: flags: bytes/sector: 512 sectors/track: 41 tracks/cylinder: 244 sectors/cylinder: 10004 cylinders: 1357 sectors/unit: 13585391 rpm: 3600 interleave: 1 trackskew: 0 cylinderskew: 0 headswitch: 0 # milliseconds track-to-track seek: 0 # milliseconds drivedata: 0 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 131072 0 4.2BSD 1024 8192 23 # (Cyl. 0 - 13*) b: 1310720 131072 swap # (Cyl. 13*- 144*) c: 13585391 0 unused 0 0 # (Cyl. 0 - 1357*) e: 12143599 1441792 4.2BSD 1024 8192 22 # (Cyl. 144*- 1357*) Basically, what you need to do is use fdisk to find the partition and change the type to BSD (fdisk -u /dev/da1 for me). Then use disklabel to write a label on that slice (disklabel -r -w /dev/da1s1 auto). Check to see what it wrote (disklabel /dev/da1s1), and possibly edit it with disklabel (disklabel -r -e /dev/da1s1). Finally newfs the partition(s) you want to mount (newfs /dev/da1s1e). You can then add it to /etc/fstab and mount and use it. You should, of course, use your disk's actual name where I used da1. http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 22:08:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0912616A4CE for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:08:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-out3.apple.com (mail-out3.apple.com [17.254.13.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E6F43D45 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:08:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkh@brierdr.com) Received: from mailgate1.apple.com (a17-128-100-225.apple.com [17.128.100.225]) by mail-out3.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iB7MF4oY021036 for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:15:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay1.apple.com (relay1.apple.com) by mailgate1.apple.com ; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:09:13 -0800 Received: from [17.202.41.137] (hoser.apple.com [17.202.41.137]) by relay1.apple.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id iB7M7YbB016607; Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:07:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20041207220412.GA33656@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041207205827.64995395.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <20041207220412.GA33656@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <6E40E93D-489C-11D9-A254-000393DACFAC@brierdr.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jordan Hubbard Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 14:07:48 -0800 To: Kris Kennaway X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 13:05:21 +0000 cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenCVS X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2004 22:08:07 -0000 One might also ask the begged question, namely whether or not it makes any sense to invest time and effort into a transition to just another implementation of cvs vs investing it in moving to something else, like SVN. No, I'm really not trying to re-ignite the "should we move to p4/svn/arch/...?" war, I'm simply saying it might be best to decide here and now that should any SCM transition ever occur, it should only be when the bang-for-buck factor reaches some significant threshold over what's currently available now. - Jordan On Dec 7, 2004, at 2:04 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 08:58:27PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote: >> Hi hackers, >> >> I've seen the OpenBSD guys have come up with a BSD-licensed CVS[1] >> that >> should be focused on security as well as features. Is there any chance >> that this could make it into FreeBSD's tree as well? Considering GNU's >> version security track record I think it could be a good move, and it >> would help testing the code in another production environment. > > Have you verified that it does everything it needs to do, and works > correctly, in a FreeBSD environment? If not, that's step one. > > Kris From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 13:09:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B946316A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:09:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpq3.home.nl (smtpq3.home.nl [213.51.128.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797E743D53 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:09:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dodell@sitetronics.com) Received: from [213.51.128.133] (port=37395 helo=smtp2.home.nl) by smtpq3.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Cc1ZH-0003Bz-AI; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 14:09:19 +0100 Received: from cc740438-a.deven1.ov.home.nl ([82.75.136.183]:4570 helo=[192.168.1.42]) by smtp2.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Cc1ZF-0004hY-Tm; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 14:09:17 +0100 Message-ID: <41B6FCFD.9050608@sitetronics.com> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 14:09:17 +0100 From: "Devon H. O'Dell" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Howells References: <1102494204.1072.278.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <200412080856.10196.howells@kde.org> In-Reply-To: <200412080856.10196.howells@kde.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple IPs in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 13:09:20 -0000 Chris Howells wrote: > On Wednesday 08 December 2004 08:23, Justin Hopper wrote: > >>1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails >>binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon? > > > 'ifconfig alias' Please, people, read his question. Into JAILS. When you attempt to add an alias into a jail: j02# ifconfig fxp0 alias 192.168.2.1 ifconfig: ioctl (SIOCAIFADDR): permission denied Thanks. --Devon From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 17:26:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A9816A4D0; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 17:26:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from minerva.int.gov.br (nat.int.gov.br [200.20.196.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA8043D66; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 17:26:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonny@jonny.eng.br) Received: from [10.0.8.17] (dinf-02 [10.0.8.17]) by minerva.int.gov.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F59BE72C; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 14:54:42 -0200 (BRDT) Message-ID: <41B731D3.1070007@jonny.eng.br> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 14:54:43 -0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek References: <41A4FD60.4050501@jonny.eng.br> <20041125224547.GB7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <41A6B76F.4020101@jonny.eng.br> <20041126082340.GC7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <41A78A47.3050309@jonny.eng.br> <20041128202759.GF7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <41AB37B8.7060303@jonny.eng.br> <41AB9457.6020601@jonny.eng.br> <20041129225925.GT7232@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20041208001001.GC81328@nevermind.kiev.ua> <20041208085306.GE1130@darkness.comp.waw.pl> In-Reply-To: <20041208085306.GE1130@darkness.comp.waw.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hand on gmirror (Was: Re: gmirror bugs, how many?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 17:26:27 -0000 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 02:10:02AM +0200, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: > +> Hello, Pawel Jakub Dawidek! > +> > > +> > This is known race, which is already fixed in HEAD. I want to commit it > +> > soon. > +> > +> Any plans on backporting it to RELENG_5 (RELENG_5_3 maybe?)? > > I'm going to MFC it probably this weekend to RELENG_5, RELENG_5_3 is > closed for changes like this one. Thanks! > +> To be on original topic - is there any way to make a mirror from live > +> system? I mean I have running FreeBSD on da0 and I want to make a > +> gmirror on it (I'm planning to add second drive soon). How to avoid > +> those disklabel warnings correctly? > > You still need to reboot. The whole instruction you should find in Oh yes, a reboot is surely needed. What I wanted to avoid is a full disk copy/xfer for the first consumer being created, as we have to do with vinum. > freebsd-geom@ mailing list archives, I wrote about this few times, AFAIR. Maybe a good time for a FAQ or handbook entry... From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 17:51:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE2516A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 17:51:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bsdhosting.net (bsdhosting.net [65.39.221.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DD1543D72 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 17:51:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhopper@bsdhosting.net) Received: (qmail 4248 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2004 17:51:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (jhopper@bsdhosting.net@65.39.221.113) by bsdhosting.net with SMTP; 8 Dec 2004 17:51:28 -0000 From: Justin Hopper To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <41B6DC9E.6020300@sitetronics.com> References: <1102494204.1072.278.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <18f601940412080026ee1d85c@mail.gmail.com> <1102495769.1072.288.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <41B6DC9E.6020300@sitetronics.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 09:51:31 -0800 Message-Id: <1102528291.1072.311.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Multiple IPs in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 17:51:35 -0000 On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 11:51 +0100, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > Justin Hopper wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 00:26 -0800, Aaron Glenn wrote: > > > >>On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:23:24 -0800, Justin Hopper > >> wrote: > >> > >>>Two questions: > >>> > >>>1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails > >>>binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon? > >> > >>Someone hasn't read up on 5.x... > > > > > > I'm confused. I've been running and developing on 5.x for a few months > > now, and I'm pretty sure that multiple IPs are not supported (it's > > always possible that I've missed something...). I was curious if Poul > > or anyone else had plans to put the functionality into the base system > > in the near future? > > Correct. 5.x does not have this feature; Aaron, please read for yourself > before you are rude towards others. > > > > >>>2) Has anyone used Pawel's multiple IP patch in a semi-production > >>>environment? Can anyone report any problems or issues that they've had > >>>with it? > >> > >>I toyed with it at home without a single issue. Still, in a hosting > >>environment I'd use 5.x > > Are you sure you toyed with it? And in a production environment, I'd > still recommend 4.10. > > > > > The patch from Pawel that I was looking at was "against-CURRENT", so I > > was assuming that was for 5, and not some 4.x-CURRENT branch? > > Correct. Pawel's patches haven't been incorporated for various reasons, > but I'm not a committer, so I won't give them. There have been several > threads on the list questioning this over the last year and a half. > > I have run the MIP patch and found no problems. I believe there is a > race condition that it introduces, but that could be irrelevant / > incorrect information. I'll leave it up to PJD and others to provide any > more information if it is necessary and to you to search the lists for > the other relevant threads. Thanks for understanding my question, Devon. I guess at this point I'll patch a system here and begin testing with it, and hopefully PJD or PHK or somebody else @freebsd will respond with any plans to roll this functionality into the base system. It's really not a problem if there is no plans to do it, I just don't want to spend a lot of time fiddling with a patch and then find it in the base system in 5.4 or something. -- Justin Hopper UNIX Systems Engineer BSDHosting.net Hosting Division of Digital Oasys Inc. http://www.bsdhosting.net From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 18:09:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7756516A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 18:09:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpq1.home.nl (smtpq1.home.nl [213.51.128.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DB543D6B for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 18:09:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dodell@sitetronics.com) Received: from [213.51.128.134] (port=55809 helo=smtp3.home.nl) by smtpq1.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Cc6GB-0000wW-0g; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 19:09:55 +0100 Received: from cc740438-a.deven1.ov.home.nl ([82.75.136.183]:3724 helo=[192.168.1.42]) by smtp3.home.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Cc6GA-0006w3-7A; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 19:09:54 +0100 Message-ID: <41B74372.4070105@sitetronics.com> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 19:09:54 +0100 From: "Devon H. O'Dell" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Justin Hopper References: <1102494204.1072.278.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <18f601940412080026ee1d85c@mail.gmail.com> <1102495769.1072.288.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <41B6DC9E.6020300@sitetronics.com> <1102528291.1072.311.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> In-Reply-To: <1102528291.1072.311.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AtHome-MailScanner-Information: Please contact support@home.nl for more information X-AtHome-MailScanner: Found to be clean cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple IPs in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 18:09:56 -0000 Justin Hopper wrote: [snip] > > Thanks for understanding my question, Devon. I guess at this point I'll > patch a system here and begin testing with it, and hopefully PJD or PHK > or somebody else @freebsd will respond with any plans to roll this > functionality into the base system. It's really not a problem if there > is no plans to do it, I just don't want to spend a lot of time fiddling > with a patch and then find it in the base system in 5.4 or something. > No problem. Let me know if you need help getting it to work. I know there have been some changes since the patches were written and that it probably won't apply cleanly. --Devon From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 19:59:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BA016A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 19:59:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2D643D53 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 19:59:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aaron.glenn@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c16so642716rne for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:59:05 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=Ta/gHNQ/OBKgjqlG4sLW4Z2qfFoJxHBrIQ00WpUdphm0n1SL3t+2mxs3TJT+IgJZ4L31erkWpCQl7Bgr9F9yeT0GlfaMaoyv6Mzpl0ARPA15dPJG17Y9WaVgjU9y18x+x5ko+n2kzS0z+fMjL27Rox/kEHyc0Puwf6QEgsKilcU= Received: by 10.38.68.47 with SMTP id q47mr324604rna; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:59:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.151.63 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:59:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <18f6019404120811592394ac9d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:59:05 -0800 From: Aaron Glenn To: "Devon H. O'Dell" In-Reply-To: <41B6DC9E.6020300@sitetronics.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <1102494204.1072.278.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <18f601940412080026ee1d85c@mail.gmail.com> <1102495769.1072.288.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <41B6DC9E.6020300@sitetronics.com> cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: Justin Hopper Subject: Re: Multiple IPs in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Aaron Glenn List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 19:59:06 -0000 On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:51:10 +0100, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > Justin Hopper wrote: > Correct. 5.x does not have this feature; Aaron, please read for yourself > before you are rude towards others. Turn's out *I* missed something. I'd have sworn up and down 5.3's jail implementation had multiple IP support. I distinctly remember reading that tidbit and thinking how great it was. I can't find what I thought I read and it turns out I'm completely wrong. And I apologize if I came across rude. That wasn't my intention. /eats crow > Are you sure you toyed with it? And in a production environment, I'd > still recommend 4.10. Yes, I'm sure. Regards, aaron.glenn From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 00:42:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C375D16A4CE for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 00:42:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from darkness.comp.waw.pl (darkness.comp.waw.pl [195.117.238.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659DE43D72 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 00:42:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pjd@darkness.comp.waw.pl) Received: by darkness.comp.waw.pl (Postfix, from userid 1009) id EDC7DACAFB; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 01:42:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 01:42:44 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek To: Justin Hopper Message-ID: <20041209004244.GN1130@darkness.comp.waw.pl> References: <1102494204.1072.278.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <18f601940412080026ee1d85c@mail.gmail.com> <1102495769.1072.288.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <41B6DC9E.6020300@sitetronics.com> <1102528291.1072.311.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WU3I8Do+sziGY3UL" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1102528291.1072.311.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-PGP-Key-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/pjd.asc X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RC2 i386 cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple IPs in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 00:42:47 -0000 --WU3I8Do+sziGY3UL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:51:31AM -0800, Justin Hopper wrote: +> Thanks for understanding my question, Devon. I guess at this point I'll +> patch a system here and begin testing with it, and hopefully PJD or PHK +> or somebody else @freebsd will respond with any plans to roll this +> functionality into the base system. It's really not a problem if there +> is no plans to do it, I just don't want to spend a lot of time fiddling +> with a patch and then find it in the base system in 5.4 or something. My patch still has some issues. I updated the patch against HEAD from a minute ago: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/jail_2004120901.patch I don't have time to work on this right now, so can't say if/when it'll be committed. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --WU3I8Do+sziGY3UL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBt5+EForvXbEpPzQRAjXJAKDWqa1U5A7kUHUPPdjJe0DemwI16wCgiJUD GXqqE3ymaSQjwL4L8XMHn4k= =FyQN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WU3I8Do+sziGY3UL-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 01:47:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB5816A4CE for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 01:47:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.vicor-nb.com (bigwoop.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC51B43D45 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 01:47:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from elischer.org (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by mail.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AACE7A403; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 17:47:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <41B7AEB7.8030203@elischer.org> Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 17:47:35 -0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030516 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stucchi@willystudios.com References: <20041206135432.GA38257@cvs.freesbie.org> <41B5CAB5.9050904@dnainternet.net> <1102441928.66948.20.camel@kaiser.sig11.org> <20041208100257.GF73030@willystudios.com> In-Reply-To: <20041208100257.GF73030@willystudios.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: Matteo Riondato cc: Dario Freni cc: Erik Udo Subject: Re: FreeSBIE 1.1 Release Announcement X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 01:47:36 -0000 Massimiliano Stucchi wrote: >On 071204, 18:52, Matteo Riondato wrote: > > >>Il giorno Mar, 07-12-2004 alle 17:22 +0200, Erik Udo ha scritto: >> >> >>>The last time i checked, FreeSBIE GUI >>>was not to my taste. >>> >>>-I rather use IceWM as my Window Manager, it is small and fast. >>>And still very usable. It's my only choise. >>> >>> >>Users can now choose between Xfce 4.2-rc and Fluxbox. Look at the >>screenshots: >>http://www.freesbie.org/?section=screenshot-en >> >> > >I would like to also point out the FreeSBIE Manual, located at > >http://www.freesbie.org/manual/ > >where we describe each environment you can choose, and the possibilities >offered by the FreeSBIE framework. > > > >>>-The window manager was in some weird language, >>>i guess it was brasilian or italian. >>> >>> >>This issue was solved and now there is no special l10n. >> >> > >Yes, that was an error carried by the first release. > >Ciao ! > Works well on machines I have tested (though it would be nice if our ntfs was able to write) On my laptop (Dell inspiron 7500) however it came up fine and x.org thinks it's running but the screen is just black.. possibly just an x.org problem.. I run XFree86 on that machine still. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 02:06:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063E916A4CE; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 02:06:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ECEB43D5D; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 02:06:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05DC865428; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 02:06:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19552-03-2; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 02:06:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (dhcp120.icir.org [192.150.187.120]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26D5651EB; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 02:06:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6ADE56710; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 18:05:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 18:05:25 -0800 From: Bruce M Simpson To: "Scott M. Ferris" Message-ID: <20041209020525.GA691@empiric.icir.org> References: <20041207153117.536b9399@daemon.cmotd.com> <20041207214554.GK79919@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20041208115849.06de4961@daemon.cmotd.com> <1eea89cd04120811026b06b288@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1eea89cd04120811026b06b288@mail.gmail.com> cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: Jeremie Le Hen cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UCARP support for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 02:06:30 -0000 On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 01:02:09PM -0600, Scott M. Ferris wrote: > ucarp will compile and run, but will silently fail to send heartbeats > due to the way libpcap > opens bpf on FreeBSD. You can find a patch to libpcap in PR 72814. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72814 This is something else which needs a pcap/tcpdump update. Currently there is no way to specify this behaviour at runtime. Hopefully this should be resolved at the next import. BMS From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 05:07:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC93B16A4CE for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 05:07:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bsdhosting.net (bsdhosting.net [65.39.221.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 73ECC43D3F for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 05:07:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhopper@bsdhosting.net) Received: (qmail 610 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2004 05:07:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) (jhopper@bsdhosting.net@65.39.221.113) by bsdhosting.net with SMTP; 9 Dec 2004 05:07:11 -0000 From: Justin Hopper To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20041209004244.GN1130@darkness.comp.waw.pl> References: <1102494204.1072.278.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <18f601940412080026ee1d85c@mail.gmail.com> <1102495769.1072.288.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <41B6DC9E.6020300@sitetronics.com> <1102528291.1072.311.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> <20041209004244.GN1130@darkness.comp.waw.pl> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 21:07:15 -0800 Message-Id: <1102568835.1072.394.camel@work.gusalmighty.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Multiple IPs in jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 05:07:19 -0000 On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 01:42 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:51:31AM -0800, Justin Hopper wrote: > +> Thanks for understanding my question, Devon. I guess at this point I'll > +> patch a system here and begin testing with it, and hopefully PJD or PHK > +> or somebody else @freebsd will respond with any plans to roll this > +> functionality into the base system. It's really not a problem if there > +> is no plans to do it, I just don't want to spend a lot of time fiddling > +> with a patch and then find it in the base system in 5.4 or something. > > My patch still has some issues. I updated the patch against HEAD from a > minute ago: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/patches/jail_2004120901.patch > > I don't have time to work on this right now, so can't say if/when it'll > be committed. > Thanks for the update, Pawel. The new patch was pretty easy to implement, only failed on one chunk. The new system is up and I'll be testing the multiple IPs soon. If there are any known pitfalls that I should be aware of, please let me know, or if there is a list/discussion of them somewhere, I'd be grateful for the link. -- Justin Hopper UNIX Systems Engineer BSDHosting.net Hosting Division of Digital Oasys Inc. http://www.bsdhosting.net From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 07:54:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E074D16A4CE; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 07:54:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr (postfix4-2.free.fr [213.228.0.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E44F43D54; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 07:54:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (unknown [82.233.239.98]) by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47D53255A3B; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 08:54:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 98E04412C; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 08:52:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 08:52:53 +0100 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: Bruce M Simpson Message-ID: <20041209075253.GY79919@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <20041207153117.536b9399@daemon.cmotd.com> <20041207214554.GK79919@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20041208115849.06de4961@daemon.cmotd.com> <1eea89cd04120811026b06b288@mail.gmail.com> <20041209020525.GA691@empiric.icir.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041209020525.GA691@empiric.icir.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: "Scott M. Ferris" cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: Jeremie Le Hen cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UCARP support for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 07:54:33 -0000 > This is something else which needs a pcap/tcpdump update. Currently there > is no way to specify this behaviour at runtime. > > Hopefully this should be resolved at the next import. Do you know when it is scheduled ? -- Jeremie Le Hen jeremie@le-hen.org From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 15:46:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E070F16A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 15:46:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpauth03.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth03.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A3D443D55 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 15:46:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from welchsm@earthlink.net) Received: from [66.41.102.215] (helo=NitroPhys.welchsmnet.net) by smtpauth03.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1Cc41U-0001yz-Rf; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 10:46:37 -0500 Received: from NitroPhys.welchsmnet.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) iB8FjrlV005788; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:45:53 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from welchsm@localhost.welchsmnet.net) Received: (from welchsm@localhost) by NitroPhys.welchsmnet.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iB8FjqXx005787; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:45:52 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from welchsm) Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 09:45:52 -0600 From: Sean Welch To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041208154552.GA5738@NitroPhys.welchsmnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-ELNK-Trace: 15d86f98c8ef8acad780f4a490ca69563f9fea00a6dd62bceaa0a19104254061c3c79161e19e568c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 66.41.102.215 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 13:10:06 +0000 cc: ler@airmail.net Subject: [patch] Samsung SPH-i500 Palm phone as a modem and organizer under 5.3-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sean_Welch@alum.wofford.org List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:46:38 -0000 I saw a while back that someone was asking about using this device as a modem. I've now purchased one and have done some work on the usb subsystem to use it both as a modem and a Palm device. Have a look at the PR I just filed (with the patch in it): http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=74849 The message I saw earlier is here: http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?155150000.1067738418 I've taken the liberty of cc'ing you, LER, just in case you still have the phone and would like to use it with FreeBSD. The section I've added to my /etc/usbd.conf file to handle syncing is as follows: device "Samsung I500" devname "ucom0" vendor 0x0830 product 0x0001 release 0x0100 attach "/usr/bin/su - welchsm -c '/usr/X11R6/bin/jpilot-sync -b'" Note that the vendor and product codes belong to Palm *not* Samsung. I prefer a full backup of everything on the phone but if you just want contacts/notes/schedule you can leave off the -b. Make sure usbd is running and this will fire off as soon as you hit the sync button (logged in or not!). Running the GUI interface for jpilot will also work -- IF you press the sync button *before* starting the program. Neither coldsync nor gnomepilot seems to work, though I suspect that with the newer usb setup in -CURRENT (creating ttyU* devices) that gnomepilot would work there. I hope someone else can get as much use as I am from this device! Sean From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 19:02:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24BE716A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 19:02:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CB443D5D for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 19:02:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sferris@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id y7so757490rne for ; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:02:10 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=dD1qGdbO+OJYryLKeZD+6cfqKf+8ipRzMEmcxnZwQciigmpabd3slbERRDD1EBnAiuCo3MyE3RAT+8CEFza+yDSlZ+qOcHdGwXmtaNuz3ezBuGuo4OSNVOYy8rvHM5SOkB+sVU9AUaaoWxKSW276fjOC/OSmOPWb9lNENcoLbns= Received: by 10.38.208.43 with SMTP id f43mr437702rng; Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:02:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.83.5 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:02:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1eea89cd04120811026b06b288@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:02:09 -0600 From: "Scott M. Ferris" To: Vladimir Terziev In-Reply-To: <20041208115849.06de4961@daemon.cmotd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20041207153117.536b9399@daemon.cmotd.com> <20041207214554.GK79919@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20041208115849.06de4961@daemon.cmotd.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 13:10:06 +0000 cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: Jeremie Le Hen cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UCARP support for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Scott M. Ferris" List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 19:02:11 -0000 On Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:58:49 +0200, Vladimir Terziev wrote: > > Hi Jeremie, > > I've managed to build UCARP binary on FreeBSD 4.x without any problem. > Now i have to test it how good it works. ucarp will compile and run, but will silently fail to send heartbeats due to the way libpcap opens bpf on FreeBSD. You can find a patch to libpcap in PR 72814. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72814 -- Scott M. Ferris From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 8 21:47:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B6216A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 21:47:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from delight.idiom.com (delight.idiom.com [216.240.32.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B82E43D3F for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 21:47:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwm-dated-1103406453.4bfc29@mired.org) Received: from idiom.com (idiom.com [216.240.32.1]) by delight.idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C09DD1C53F7 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:47:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mired.org (mwm@idiom [216.240.32.1]) by idiom.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with SMTP id iB8LlX4Q084055 for ; Wed, 8 Dec 2004 13:47:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mwm-dated-1103406453.4bfc29@mired.org) Received: (qmail 97646 invoked by uid 100); 8 Dec 2004 21:47:33 -0000 Received: by guru.mired.org (tmda-sendmail, from uid 100); Wed, 08 Dec 2004 15:47:29 -0600 (CST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16823.30320.849399.610561@guru.mired.org> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 15:47:28 -0600 To: Jordan Hubbard In-Reply-To: <6E40E93D-489C-11D9-A254-000393DACFAC@brierdr.com> References: <20041207205827.64995395.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> <20041207220412.GA33656@xor.obsecurity.org> <6E40E93D-489C-11D9-A254-000393DACFAC@brierdr.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid X-Primary-Address: mwm@mired.org X-face: "5Mnwy%?j>IIV\)A=):rjWL~NB2aH[}Yq8Z=u~vJ`"(,&SiLvbbz2W`; h9L,Yg`+vb1>RG% *h+%X^n0EZd>TM8_IB;a8F?(Fb"lw'IgCoyM.[Lg#r\ X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.0.3 (Seattle Slew) From: Mike Meyer X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 13:10:06 +0000 cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: OpenCVS X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 21:47:35 -0000 In <6E40E93D-489C-11D9-A254-000393DACFAC@brierdr.com>, Jordan Hubbard typed: > One might also ask the begged question, namely whether or not it makes > any sense to invest time and effort into a transition to just another > implementation of cvs vs investing it in moving to something else, like > SVN. No, I'm really not trying to re-ignite the "should we move to > p4/svn/arch/...?" war, I'm simply saying it might be best to decide > here and now that should any SCM transition ever occur, it should only > be when the bang-for-buck factor reaches some significant threshold > over what's currently available now. The interesting question is how much of a cvs clone is OpenCVS? If it will work with existing repositories, then there isn't any transition required - just plug in the software. But finding that out will require waiting until there is a release of OpenCVS. http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 13:52:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE3916A4CE; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 13:52:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.tacorp.net (mail.tacorp.net [64.246.111.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C865243D31; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 13:52:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from raistlin@tacorp.net) Received: from mail.tacorp.net (raistlin@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.tacorp.net (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iB9DtlJV066624; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 08:55:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from raistlin@tacorp.net) Received: from localhost (raistlin@localhost)iB9DtlLY066621; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 08:55:47 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from raistlin@tacorp.net) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.tacorp.net: raistlin owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 08:55:47 -0500 (EST) From: Jason Slagle To: "Scott M. Ferris" In-Reply-To: <1eea89cd04120811026b06b288@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20041209085435.J53452@mail.tacorp.net> References: <20041207153117.536b9399@daemon.cmotd.com> <20041208115849.06de4961@daemon.cmotd.com> <1eea89cd04120811026b06b288@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: Jeremie Le Hen cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UCARP support for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 13:52:20 -0000 On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, Scott M. Ferris wrote: > ucarp will compile and run, but will silently fail to send heartbeats > due to the way libpcap > opens bpf on FreeBSD. You can find a patch to libpcap in PR 72814. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72814 I submitted a similiar pr over a year ago to try to get it fixed so emulators (PDP-11 etc) which use pcap to send packets work. I was unable to find a committer to commit it. Perhaps this will be a more important issue than that was as I'd love to see the patch committed. Jason -- Jason Slagle - CCNP - CCDP /"\ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign . X - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . / \ - NO Word docs in e-mail . From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 16:02:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541B016A4CE for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:02:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ims-2.prv.ampira.com (ims-2.ampira.com [66.179.231.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63C943D62 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 16:02:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kamalp@acm.org) Received: from [202.142.94.194] (helo=[172.16.3.26]) by ims-2.prv.ampira.com with asmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CcQkK-0001uX-JW; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 11:02:26 -0500 Message-ID: <41B8770C.40707@acm.org> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 21:32:20 +0530 From: "Kamal R. Prasad" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (Windows/20040803) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John-Mark Gurney References: <41B20B19.3090204@acm.org> <20041206025126.GO19624@funkthat.com> <41B3F24B.1000903@acm.org> <20041206074237.GP19624@funkthat.com> <41B5DF9B.50501@acm.org> <20041207221919.GQ19624@funkthat.com> <20041207222115.GA74736@freebie.xs4all.nl> <41B68DF5.6070708@acm.org> <20041208090504.GT19624@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <20041208090504.GT19624@funkthat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Wilko Bulte cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mmap() X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 16:02:33 -0000 John-Mark Gurney wrote: >Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:45 +0530: > > >>Wilko Bulte wrote: >> >> >> >>>On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:19:19PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote.. >>> >>> >>> >>>>Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 22:21 +0530: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>There was a bug in my interface routine which probably resulted in too >>>>>many calls. >>>>>Something like *paddr=vtophys(base) instead of >>>>>*paddr=vtophys(base+offset) should result in lots of calls to the >>>>>interface. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>Just remeber that vtophys is not a supported interface in HEAD, (if it >>>>still works, it will probably be removed shortly).. Also, vtophys only >>>>works on limited archs, like i386 and alpha... >>>> >>>> >>>s/limited/some/ >>> >>> >>So what would be the equivalent supported interface in HEAD? >> >> > >bus_dma(9) It's a bit more complicated though... but with out it, >you won't be able to get your driver working on sparc64... > > > woudn't pmap_extract() provide me with a physical addr of the corresponding kernel virtual address? Also, is there some src code available that shows bus_dma can be used to share a block of memory between kernel and user space? My usb device probably doesn't have a dma controller, so I don't think the bulk pipe can use any memory allocated by bus_dma. [Pl. correct me if Im wrong this]. thanks -kamal >>BTW -man (4) usb probably needs more info than present. >> >> > >I'm sure it does, feel free to send-pr patches.. :) > > > From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 21:32:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B2D16A4CE for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 21:32:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailfe06.swip.net (mailfe06.swip.net [212.247.154.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5990043D46 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 21:32:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) X-T2-Posting-ID: Y1QAsIk9O44SO+J/q9KNyQ== Received: from [193.217.205.233] (HELO curly.tele2.no) by mailfe06.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.7) with ESMTP id 235249365 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 22:32:36 +0100 Received: (from root@localhost) by curly.tele2.no (8.12.5/8.12.3) id iB9LchW2003074 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 22:38:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 22:38:41 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041209223840.A3042@curly.tele2.no> References: <41B20B19.3090204@acm.org> <20041206025126.GO19624@funkthat.com> <41B3F24B.1000903@acm.org> <20041206074237.GP19624@funkthat.com> <41B5DF9B.50501@acm.org> <20041207221919.GQ19624@funkthat.com> <20041207222115.GA74736@freebie.xs4all.nl> <41B68DF5.6070708@acm.org> <20041208090504.GT19624@funkthat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20041208090504.GT19624@funkthat.com>; from gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu on Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 01:05:04AM -0800 Subject: Re: mmap() X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 21:32:39 -0000 On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 01:05:04AM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:45 +0530: > > Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > > >On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:19:19PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote.. > > > > > >>Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 22:21 +0530: > > >> > > >>>There was a bug in my interface routine which probably resulted in too > > >>>many calls. > > >>>Something like *paddr=vtophys(base) instead of > > >>>*paddr=vtophys(base+offset) should result in lots of calls to the > > >>>interface. > > >>> > > >>Just remeber that vtophys is not a supported interface in HEAD, (if it > > >>still works, it will probably be removed shortly).. Also, vtophys only > > >>works on limited archs, like i386 and alpha... > > > > > >s/limited/some/ > > > > So what would be the equivalent supported interface in HEAD? > > bus_dma(9) It's a bit more complicated though... Why is there not a simple interface to it? I'd suggest something like: void * xxx_alloc_mem(u_int32_t size, u_int8_t align_power); u_int32_t xxx_vtophys(void *ptr, u_int32_t size); void xxx_free_mem(void *ptr, u_int32_t size); Yours -HPS From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 9 21:54:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5198216A4CE for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 21:54:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.vicor-nb.com (bigwoop.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3260443D54 for ; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 21:54:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from elischer.org (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by mail.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F167A44A; Thu, 9 Dec 2004 13:54:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <41B8C993.4070807@elischer.org> Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 13:54:27 -0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030516 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Kamal R. Prasad" References: <41B20B19.3090204@acm.org> <20041206025126.GO19624@funkthat.com> <41B3F24B.1000903@acm.org> <20041206074237.GP19624@funkthat.com> <41B5DF9B.50501@acm.org> <20041207221919.GQ19624@funkthat.com> <20041207222115.GA74736@freebie.xs4all.nl> <41B68DF5.6070708@acm.org> <20041208090504.GT19624@funkthat.com> <41B8770C.40707@acm.org> In-Reply-To: <41B8770C.40707@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Wilko Bulte cc: John-Mark Gurney cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mmap() X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 21:54:28 -0000 Kamal R. Prasad wrote: > > My usb device probably doesn't have a dma controller, so I don't think > the bulk pipe can use any memory allocated by bus_dma. [Pl. correct me > if Im wrong this]. > thanks > -kamal > all USB devices use full scatter-gather DMA. UHCI and OHCI are limitted I believe to 4GB of ram. EHCI (USB2) has a 64 bit extension that allows all DMAs of data to be 64 bit addresses. I don't know however which chips support the 64 bit extensions. From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 04:05:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7366F16A4CE for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 04:05:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web52708.mail.yahoo.com (web52708.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.39.159]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E700843D41 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 04:05:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kamalpr@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 48003 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Dec 2004 04:05:29 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=uSZ6oMMsETt03GPYCvK/V+35OAxILfgDsCNF5rHIu2Wm4zPygNCRl+cuJLgmB9waOii8kArBPv9KCv/Mj2JeWKBalsXjfZditJFgN+G3bFGfuyB+yZWxAMpRFuPoINd/iKuSUF1i70yawhJwF6XlfOYuW4qHUfaylINmE/TD624= ; Message-ID: <20041210040529.48001.qmail@web52708.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.142.94.194] by web52708.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 09 Dec 2004 20:05:29 PST Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2004 20:05:29 -0800 (PST) From: "Kamal R. Prasad" To: Julian Elischer , "Kamal R. Prasad" In-Reply-To: <41B8C993.4070807@elischer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: Wilko Bulte cc: John-Mark Gurney cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mmap() X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: kamalp@acm.org List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 04:05:30 -0000 --- Julian Elischer wrote: > > > Kamal R. Prasad wrote: > > > > > My usb device probably doesn't have a dma > controller, so I don't think > > the bulk pipe can use any memory allocated by > bus_dma. [Pl. correct me > > if Im wrong this]. > > thanks > > -kamal > > > all USB devices use full scatter-gather DMA. UHCI > and OHCI are limitted > I believe to 4GB of ram. > EHCI (USB2) has a 64 bit extension that allows all > DMAs of data to be > 64 bit addresses. > I don't know however which chips support the 64 bit > extensions. > So how does one use bus_dma within the USB framework? The API exists, but I don't think any of the src code in src/sys/dev/usb actually uses bus_dma. Oh btw -my data transfer is < 100K, so the 64-bit thing is not an issue. regards -kamal > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 15:02:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3F516A4CE for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:02:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.revolutionsp.com (ganymede.revolutionsp.com [64.246.0.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F9343D4C for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:02:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from klr@6s-gaming.com) Received: from mail.revolutionsp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.revolutionsp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3302315C96 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 05:58:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from 194.210.13.66 (SquirrelMail authenticated user klr@6s-gaming.com); by mail.revolutionsp.com with HTTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 05:58:06 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <36627.194.210.13.66.1102679886.squirrel@194.210.13.66> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 05:58:06 -0600 (CST) From: klr@6s-gaming.com To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: HTT/SMP servers instability on 5.3-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 15:02:28 -0000 Hi, I have a Dual Xeon 2.4 and a Dual Xeon 2.8 servers running with HyperThreading, ACPI, and SMP enabled. The 2.8 server won't stand for more than 5 days without crashing, and the 2.4 server was up 30 days crashed, now was up 12 days, and crashed. I didn't have a debugging kernel, I'll be building one when the datacenter reboots the server. I also don't have any panic messages.. I have, however, a few questions: - machdep.cpu_idle_hlt - I've seen a lot on google about this sysctl, but still don't fully understand it. What does this sysctl really changes? - HyperThreading - Do I really have a performance increase with HTT turned on? I've heard it can penalize performance because the scheduler isn't optimized for logical CPUs. Does having HTT enabled impacts the stability of the system? - ACPI - I'll be disabling ACPI along with HTT to see if the server doesn't crash for awhile. Is ACPI on 5.3-STABLE (around November 1st, it was pre-release) still a problem? Last but not the least, my 5.3-STABLE version is from a few days before the release. Since I had created a few jails by then, I didn't upgrade the system to use the -RELEASE. Was there any last-standing problem a few days before the release that could be causing my instability problems? Please share some common dual processor system knowledge, perhaps I'm missing something really obvious and making these servers unstable. Regards, Hugo From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 16:29:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7766E16A4CE; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:29:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.revolutionsp.com (ganymede.revolutionsp.com [64.246.0.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA9D43D2F; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:29:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from klr@6s-gaming.com) Received: from mail.revolutionsp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.revolutionsp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B962E15C95; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 07:24:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from 81.84.175.77 (SquirrelMail authenticated user klr@6s-gaming.com); by mail.revolutionsp.com with HTTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 07:24:42 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <56564.81.84.175.77.1102685082.squirrel@81.84.175.77> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 07:24:42 -0600 (CST) From: klr@6s-gaming.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: HTT/SMP servers instability on 5.3-STABLE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 16:29:04 -0000 Hi, I have a Dual Xeon 2.4 and a Dual Xeon 2.8 servers running with HyperThreading, ACPI, and SMP enabled. The 2.8 server won't stand for more than 5 days without crashing, and the 2.4 server was up 30 days crashed, now was up 12 days, and crashed. I didn't have a debugging kernel, I'll be building one when the datacenter reboots the server. I also don't have any panic messages.. I have, however, a few questions: - machdep.cpu_idle_hlt - I've seen a lot on google about this sysctl, but still don't fully understand it. What does this sysctl really changes? - HyperThreading - Do I really have a performance increase with HTT turned on? I've heard it can penalize performance because the scheduler isn't optimized for logical CPUs. Does having HTT enabled impacts the stability of the system? - ACPI - I'll be disabling ACPI along with HTT to see if the server doesn't crash for awhile. Is ACPI on 5.3-STABLE (around November 1st, it was pre-release) still a problem? Last but not the least, my 5.3-STABLE version is from a few days before the release. Since I had created a few jails by then, I didn't upgrade the system to use the -RELEASE. Was there any last-standing problem a few days before the release that could be causing my instability problems? Please share some common dual processor system knowledge, perhaps I'm missing something really obvious and making these servers unstable. Regards, Hugo From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 17:36:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC3816A4CE; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:36:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.revolutionsp.com (ganymede.revolutionsp.com [64.246.0.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ACD243D39; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:36:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from klr@6s-gaming.com) Received: from mail.revolutionsp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.revolutionsp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F6115C95; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:32:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from 81.84.175.77 (SquirrelMail authenticated user klr@6s-gaming.com); by mail.revolutionsp.com with HTTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:32:28 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <56637.81.84.175.77.1102689148.squirrel@81.84.175.77> Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 08:32:28 -0600 (CST) From: klr@6s-gaming.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-smp@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: HTT/SMP Dual Xeon systems unstable X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:36:50 -0000 Hi, I'm sorry for typing this mail for the third time, I'm not sure if the other mails did reach the list. The domain I was using to send emails has just expired. Please cc me, as I'm not subscribed to the list with this email. I have a Dual Xeon 2.4 and a Dual Xeon 2.8 servers running with HyperThreading, ACPI, and SMP enabled. The 2.8 server won't stand for more than 5 days without crashing, and the 2.4 server was up 30 days crashed, now was up 12 days, and crashed. I didn't have a debugging kernel, I'll be building one when the datacenter reboots the server. I also don't have any panic messages.. I have, however, a few questions: - machdep.cpu_idle_hlt - I've seen a lot on google about this sysctl, but still don't fully understand it. What does this sysctl really changes? - HyperThreading - Do I really have a performance increase with HTT turned on? I've heard it can penalize performance because the scheduler isn't optimized for logical CPUs. Does having HTT enabled impacts the stability of the system? - ACPI - I'll be disabling ACPI along with HTT to see if the server doesn't crash for awhile. Is ACPI on 5.3-STABLE (around November 1st, it was pre-release) still a problem? Last but not the least, my 5.3-STABLE version is from a few days before the release. Since I had created a few jails by then, I didn't upgrade the system to use the -RELEASE. Was there any last-standing problem a few days before the release that could be causing my instability problems? Please share some common dual processor system knowledge, perhaps I'm missing something really obvious and making these servers unstable. Regards, Hugo From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 17:38:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6015416A4CE for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:38:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A750B43D54 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:38:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iBAHag2j033127; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 10:36:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 10:36:56 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20041210.103656.73381623.imp@bsdimp.com> To: kamalp@acm.org, kamalpr@yahoo.com From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20041210040529.48001.qmail@web52708.mail.yahoo.com> References: <41B8C993.4070807@elischer.org> <20041210040529.48001.qmail@web52708.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: wb@freebie.xs4all.nl cc: gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu cc: julian@elischer.org cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mmap() X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 17:38:47 -0000 In message: <20041210040529.48001.qmail@web52708.mail.yahoo.com> "Kamal R. Prasad" writes: : So how does one use bus_dma within the USB framework? : The API exists, but I don't think any of the src code : in src/sys/dev/usb actually uses bus_dma. Oh btw -my : data transfer is < 100K, so the 64-bit thing is not an : issue. It just happens. The transfers are done via DMA from the usb bridge chipset. Warner From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 18:03:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A6816A4CE for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 18:03:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from visp.engelschall.com (visp.engelschall.com [195.27.176.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9568A43D5C for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 18:03:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rse@engelschall.com) Received: by visp.engelschall.com (Postfix, from userid 1005) id 3E9B54CE58A; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 19:03:50 +0100 (CET) Received: by en1.engelschall.com (Postfix, from userid 10000) id 560FAA17A3; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 19:03:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 19:03:32 +0100 From: "Ralf S. Engelschall" To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041210180332.GA27788@engelschall.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: FreeBSD Subject: rc.shutdown and jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Ralf S. Engelschall" List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 18:03:44 -0000 Currently a "/etc/rc.d/jail stop" just kills all processes in the individual jails. If /etc/default/rc.conf's default way of booting the jails (jail_exec="/bin/sh /etc/rc") is used this is a rather crual approach IMHO. I think if the jail is booted through /etc/rc it also should be given the chance to shutdown via /etc/rc.shutdown. If then there are still processes remaining, the killall(1) is fine, of course. This way packages and other sub-systems have the chance to perform a graceful shutdown. It can be achieved through the following two changes (the one to /etc/rc.shutdown follows the functionality we already have in /etc/rc). Any opinions or even objections on them? Index: rc.d/jail =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/etc/rc.d/jail,v retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -d -r1.19 jail --- rc.d/jail 24 Nov 2004 10:44:39 -0000 1.19 +++ rc.d/jail 10 Dec 2004 17:56:25 -0000 @@ -198,6 +198,10 @@ _jail_id=$(cat /var/run/jail_${_jail}.id) if [ ! -z "${_jail_id}" ]; then init_variables $_jail + if [ "${jail_exec}" = "/bin/sh /etc/rc" ]; then + jexec ${_jail_id} /bin/sh /etc/rc.shutdown \ + >>${jail_rootdir}/var/log/console.log + fi killall -j ${_jail_id} -TERM > /dev/null 2>&1 jail_umount_fs echo -n " $jail_hostname" Index: rc.shutdown =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/etc/rc.shutdown,v retrieving revision 1.29 diff -u -d -r1.29 rc.shutdown --- rc.shutdown 17 Oct 2004 13:39:42 -0000 1.29 +++ rc.shutdown 10 Dec 2004 17:56:25 -0000 @@ -80,7 +80,11 @@ # Determine the shutdown order of the /etc/rc.d scripts, # and perform the operation # -files=`rcorder -k shutdown /etc/rc.d/* 2>/dev/null` +rcorder_options="-k shutdown" +if [ `/sbin/sysctl -n security.jail.jailed` -eq 1 ]; then + rcorder_options="$rcorder_options -s nojail" +fi +files=`rcorder ${rcorder_options} /etc/rc.d/* 2>/dev/null` for _rc_elem in `reverse_list $files`; do debug "run_rc_script $_rc_elem faststop" -- rse@FreeBSD.org Ralf S. Engelschall FreeBSD.org/~rse rse@engelschall.com FreeBSD committer www.engelschall.com From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 20:41:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA02816A4CE for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 20:41:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F5F143D41 for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 20:41:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EE3EC5141A; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:48:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:48:24 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: klr@6s-gaming.com Message-ID: <20041210204824.GA53907@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <36627.194.210.13.66.1102679886.squirrel@194.210.13.66> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <36627.194.210.13.66.1102679886.squirrel@194.210.13.66> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HTT/SMP servers instability on 5.3-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 20:41:40 -0000 --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 05:58:06AM -0600, klr@6s-gaming.com wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I have a Dual Xeon 2.4 and a Dual Xeon 2.8 servers running with > HyperThreading, ACPI, and SMP enabled. >=20 > The 2.8 server won't stand for more than 5 days without crashing, and the > 2.4 server was up 30 days crashed, now was up 12 days, and crashed. >=20 > I didn't have a debugging kernel, I'll be building one when the datacenter > reboots the server. I also don't have any panic messages.. I have, > however, a few questions: >=20 > - machdep.cpu_idle_hlt - I've seen a lot on google about this sysctl, but > still don't fully understand it. What does this sysctl really changes? It doesn't put the CPU to sleep in the idle loop, which can cause a performance loss in some cases, but also uses less power and generates less heat. > - HyperThreading - Do I really have a performance increase with HTT turned > on? It depends on the workload you're doing. Try it and see. =20 > I've heard it can penalize performance because the scheduler isn't > optimized for logical CPUs. Does having HTT enabled impacts the stability > of the system? No. > - ACPI - I'll be disabling ACPI along with HTT to see if the server > doesn't crash for awhile. Is ACPI on 5.3-STABLE (around November 1st, it > was pre-release) still a problem? Only if the problem is with your machine, i.e. if you have a buggy BIOS. Don't discount this; look for an update from your vendor. > Last but not the least, my 5.3-STABLE version is from a few days before > the release. Since I had created a few jails by then, I didn't upgrade the > system to use the -RELEASE. Was there any last-standing problem a few days > before the release that could be causing my instability problems? It's quite possible. The release was made when it was and not earlier precisely because there were bugs in earlier versions. Kris --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBuguYWry0BWjoQKURAlRgAJwOgYJoOMlvdmqvWvCMHe8MsNisLQCeINZF 3TZv8UL6M0Org3xIoJUiLVs= =YWc1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5vNYLRcllDrimb99-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 10 23:32:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48D516A4CE for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 23:32:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.npubs.com (mail.zoneseven.net [209.66.100.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8000F43D4C for ; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 23:32:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nielsen@memberwebs.com) From: Nielsen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041127) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <20041210180332.GA27788@engelschall.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20041210234157.478BF840325@mail.npubs.com> X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 23:41:57 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: rc.shutdown and jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 23:32:13 -0000 Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > Currently a "/etc/rc.d/jail stop" just kills all processes in the > individual jails. If /etc/default/rc.conf's default way of booting the > jails (jail_exec="/bin/sh /etc/rc") is used this is a rather crual > approach IMHO. I think if the jail is booted through /etc/rc it also > should be given the chance to shutdown via /etc/rc.shutdown. If then > there are still processes remaining, the killall(1) is fine, of course. > This way packages and other sub-systems have the chance to perform a > graceful shutdown. Definitely a good plan. You just have to watch out for environment variable leakage into the jail subsystem when using jexec. A minor concern, perhaps. This is what the jkill from the jailutils package does: http://memberwebs.com/nielsen/freebsd/jails/jailutils Cheers, Nate From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 08:29:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C6016A4CE for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 08:29:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from visp.engelschall.com (visp.engelschall.com [195.27.176.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9295743D58 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 08:29:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rse@engelschall.com) Received: by visp.engelschall.com (Postfix, from userid 1005) id 53D0E4CE5AC; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 09:29:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by en1.engelschall.com (Postfix, from userid 10000) id 42DE2A17A7; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 09:28:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 09:28:57 +0100 From: "Ralf S. Engelschall" To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041211082857.GA5218@engelschall.com> References: <20041210180332.GA27788@engelschall.com> <20041210234157.478BF840325@mail.npubs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041210234157.478BF840325@mail.npubs.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: FreeBSD Subject: Re: rc.shutdown and jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Ralf S. Engelschall" List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 08:29:09 -0000 On Fri, Dec 10, 2004, Nielsen wrote: > Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > >Currently a "/etc/rc.d/jail stop" just kills all processes in the > >individual jails. If /etc/default/rc.conf's default way of booting the > >jails (jail_exec="/bin/sh /etc/rc") is used this is a rather crual > >approach IMHO. I think if the jail is booted through /etc/rc it also > >should be given the chance to shutdown via /etc/rc.shutdown. If then > >there are still processes remaining, the killall(1) is fine, of course. > >This way packages and other sub-systems have the chance to perform a > >graceful shutdown. > > Definitely a good plan. You just have to watch out for environment > variable leakage into the jail subsystem when using jexec. A minor > concern, perhaps. > [...] Ok, good point. I think running "env -i /usr/sbin/jexec" instead of just "jexec" is sufficient here because the rc.shutdown reinitializes at least PATH and HOME again and the remaining variables should be not needed for the procedure. -- rse@FreeBSD.org Ralf S. Engelschall FreeBSD.org/~rse rse@engelschall.com FreeBSD committer www.engelschall.com From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 08:44:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B169A16A4CE; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 08:44:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pimout3-ext.prodigy.net (pimout3-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.63.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDCDF43D5F; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 08:44:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from [192.168.1.102] (adsl-216-100-134-143.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.100.134.143])iBB8iDNb055516; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 03:44:15 -0500 Message-ID: <41BAB35C.8030401@elischer.org> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 00:44:12 -0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20041017 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ralf S. Engelschall" References: <20041210180332.GA27788@engelschall.com> <20041210234157.478BF840325@mail.npubs.com> <20041211082857.GA5218@engelschall.com> In-Reply-To: <20041211082857.GA5218@engelschall.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.shutdown and jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 08:44:19 -0000 Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2004, Nielsen wrote: > > >>Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: >> >>>Currently a "/etc/rc.d/jail stop" just kills all processes in the >>>individual jails. If /etc/default/rc.conf's default way of booting the >>>jails (jail_exec="/bin/sh /etc/rc") is used this is a rather crual >>>approach IMHO. I think if the jail is booted through /etc/rc it also >>>should be given the chance to shutdown via /etc/rc.shutdown. If then >>>there are still processes remaining, the killall(1) is fine, of course. >>>This way packages and other sub-systems have the chance to perform a >>>graceful shutdown. >> >>Definitely a good plan. You just have to watch out for environment >>variable leakage into the jail subsystem when using jexec. A minor >>concern, perhaps. >>[...] > > > Ok, good point. I think running "env -i /usr/sbin/jexec" instead of > just "jexec" is sufficient here because the rc.shutdown reinitializes > at least PATH and HOME again and the remaining variables should be not > needed for the procedure. I think we should introduce an "init" process for jails.. It would be responsible for all that the normal init is responsible for except for being the default parent.. (some might argue for that too). Sending it a particular signal would notify it to send shutdown signals to all its compatriots in the jail etc. In my (4.x) based jail systems I use a script jkill to send a signl to all processes with a particular root node, and a jps to allow me to look at the processes in a particular node. We could certainly simplify the world by adding more utilities of this sort. Julian From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 09:16:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF2916A4CE for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 09:16:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vanity.bsd.krakow.pl (vanity.bsd.krakow.pl [62.121.132.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C441D43D1F for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 09:16:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from diavul@bsd.krakow.pl) Received: from grazer-2.bsd.krakow.pl (unknown [10.0.0.5]) by vanity.bsd.krakow.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1838B164856; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 10:16:32 +0100 (CET) Received: by grazer-2.bsd.krakow.pl (Postfix, from userid 666) id 4DC18D1DB7; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 10:16:20 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 10:16:20 +0100 From: Michal Belczyk To: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <20041211091619.GA1620@grazer-2.bsd.krakow.pl> References: <20041210180332.GA27788@engelschall.com> <20041210234157.478BF840325@mail.npubs.com> <20041211082857.GA5218@engelschall.com> <41BAB35C.8030401@elischer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41BAB35C.8030401@elischer.org> X-GPG-Key-URL: http://www.bsd.krakow.pl/diavul.gpg User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.shutdown and jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 09:16:21 -0000 On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 12:44:12AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > >On Fri, Dec 10, 2004, Nielsen wrote: > > > > > >>Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > >> > >>>Currently a "/etc/rc.d/jail stop" just kills all processes in the > >>>individual jails. If /etc/default/rc.conf's default way of booting the > >>>jails (jail_exec="/bin/sh /etc/rc") is used this is a rather crual > >>>approach IMHO. I think if the jail is booted through /etc/rc it also > >>>should be given the chance to shutdown via /etc/rc.shutdown. If then > >>>there are still processes remaining, the killall(1) is fine, of course. > >>>This way packages and other sub-systems have the chance to perform a > >>>graceful shutdown. > >> > >>Definitely a good plan. You just have to watch out for environment > >>variable leakage into the jail subsystem when using jexec. A minor > >>concern, perhaps. > >>[...] > > > > > >Ok, good point. I think running "env -i /usr/sbin/jexec" instead of > >just "jexec" is sufficient here because the rc.shutdown reinitializes > >at least PATH and HOME again and the remaining variables should be not > >needed for the procedure. > > I think we should introduce an "init" process for jails.. > > It would be responsible for all that the normal init is responsible for > except for being the default parent.. (some might argue for that too). > Sending it a particular signal would notify it to > send shutdown signals to all its compatriots in the jail etc. That's what Nielsen's jailer or my kjailer(*) do. Just set jail_blah_exec to point it. (*) http://www.bsd.krakow.pl/kjailer.tbz -- Michal Belczyk From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 10:22:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B052116A4CE; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 10:22:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from darkness.comp.waw.pl (darkness.comp.waw.pl [195.117.238.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3390E43D2F; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 10:22:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pjd@darkness.comp.waw.pl) Received: by darkness.comp.waw.pl (Postfix, from userid 1009) id 2D7C9ACC26; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 11:22:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 11:22:01 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek To: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <20041211102201.GU1130@darkness.comp.waw.pl> References: <20041210180332.GA27788@engelschall.com> <20041210234157.478BF840325@mail.npubs.com> <20041211082857.GA5218@engelschall.com> <41BAB35C.8030401@elischer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="msgLTjjeumHWYklJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41BAB35C.8030401@elischer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-PGP-Key-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~pjd/pjd.asc X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2.1-RC2 i386 cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org cc: "Ralf S. Engelschall" Subject: Re: rc.shutdown and jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 10:22:03 -0000 --msgLTjjeumHWYklJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 12:44:12AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: +> I think we should introduce an "init" process for jails.. +>=20 +> It would be responsible for all that the normal init is responsible for +> except for being the default parent.. (some might argue for that too). +> Sending it a particular signal would notify it to +> send shutdown signals to all its compatriots in the jail etc. I started to work on this in perforce: pjd_jailinit. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --msgLTjjeumHWYklJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBuspJForvXbEpPzQRAiWZAKDTVgqlRPl7rz/xto6sit5glgrjoACgo5SJ uj/Ssa9AyHuL9kx1wDt5LA0= =jIa5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --msgLTjjeumHWYklJ-- From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 12:54:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92CDA16A4CE for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:54:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from visp.engelschall.com (visp.engelschall.com [195.27.176.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1714443D2D for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:54:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rse@engelschall.com) Received: by visp.engelschall.com (Postfix, from userid 1005) id DD89B4CE5AC; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:54:56 +0100 (CET) Received: by en1.engelschall.com (Postfix, from userid 10000) id BC07EA17A7; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:54:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:54:35 +0100 From: "Ralf S. Engelschall" To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20041211125435.GA28205@engelschall.com> References: <20041210180332.GA27788@engelschall.com> <20041210234157.478BF840325@mail.npubs.com> <20041211082857.GA5218@engelschall.com> <41BAB35C.8030401@elischer.org> <20041211091619.GA1620@grazer-2.bsd.krakow.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041211091619.GA1620@grazer-2.bsd.krakow.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: FreeBSD Subject: Re: rc.shutdown and jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Ralf S. Engelschall" List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 12:54:49 -0000 On Sat, Dec 11, 2004, Michal Belczyk wrote: > On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 12:44:12AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > > >On Fri, Dec 10, 2004, Nielsen wrote: > > >>Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > > >> > > >>>Currently a "/etc/rc.d/jail stop" just kills all processes in the > > >>>individual jails. If /etc/default/rc.conf's default way of booting the > > >>>jails (jail_exec="/bin/sh /etc/rc") is used this is a rather crual > > >>>approach IMHO. I think if the jail is booted through /etc/rc it also > > >>>should be given the chance to shutdown via /etc/rc.shutdown. If then > > >>>there are still processes remaining, the killall(1) is fine, of course. > > >>>This way packages and other sub-systems have the chance to perform a > > >>>graceful shutdown. > > >> > > >>Definitely a good plan. You just have to watch out for environment > > >>variable leakage into the jail subsystem when using jexec. A minor > > >>concern, perhaps. > > >>[...] > > > > > > > > >Ok, good point. I think running "env -i /usr/sbin/jexec" instead of > > >just "jexec" is sufficient here because the rc.shutdown reinitializes > > >at least PATH and HOME again and the remaining variables should be not > > >needed for the procedure. > > > > I think we should introduce an "init" process for jails.. > > > > It would be responsible for all that the normal init is responsible for > > except for being the default parent.. (some might argue for that too). > > Sending it a particular signal would notify it to > > send shutdown signals to all its compatriots in the jail etc. > > That's what Nielsen's jailer or my kjailer(*) do. Just set jail_blah_exec > to point it. > > (*) http://www.bsd.krakow.pl/kjailer.tbz Ok, I think we have two issues here: 1. The rc mechanism should be improved to better support the automatic starting and stopping of jails. This is what I currently try to address here as the first step. 2. The jail controlling through an init-style process is a reasonable addon functionality. This is what jailer and kjailer try to address and which is the foundation of a program which IMHO in the long term should be added to the base system, too. Point (2) depends on (1), I think. Hence I suggest the following improved change which already plays nicely according to my tests with both plain rc/rc.shutdown-based jails and kjailer-based jails: http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/work/jail-startstop.txt Further feedback on this change is desired... -- rse@FreeBSD.org Ralf S. Engelschall FreeBSD.org/~rse rse@engelschall.com FreeBSD committer www.engelschall.com From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 11 14:26:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E6916A4D0 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 14:26:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-in-06.arcor-online.net (mail-in-06.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC9C43D5E for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 14:26:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailnull@mips.inka.de) Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (dsl-213-023-052-071.arcor-ip.net [213.23.52.71]) by mail-in-06.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA196DBF1E for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 15:26:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBBEQra7035403 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 15:26:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mailnull@kemoauc.mips.inka.de) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id iBBEQrt6035402 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Sat, 11 Dec 2004 15:26:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mailnull) From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 14:26:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20041207205827.64995395.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> Originator: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenCVS X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 14:26:56 -0000 Miguel Mendez wrote: > I've seen the OpenBSD guys have come up with a BSD-licensed CVS[1] that > should be focused on security as well as features. Is there any chance > that this could make it into FreeBSD's tree as well? OpenCVS is very much a work in progress at this point. Development has moved into the OpenBSD repository, but it is not hooked into builds yet. In fact, there hasn't even been a call for testing. > it would help testing the code in another production environment. Any talk of OpenCVS in a production environment is premature. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de