From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 00:10:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B5F16A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:10:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org (nezlok.unixathome.org [66.154.97.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A520D43D53; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:10:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F293AE088; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:10:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nezlok.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 85579-01; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:10:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0B19FAE07D; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:10:03 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040111081003.0B19FAE07D@nezlok.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:10:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2003-12-21 - 2004-01-10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:10:12 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . -- Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited The FreeBSD Diary - http://www.FreeBSDDiary.org/ - practical examples FreshPorts - http://www.FreshPorts.org/ - the place for ports FreshSource - http://www.FreshSource.org/ - the place for source From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 00:12:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE66516A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:12:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from m00.ca.astound.net (m00.ca.astound.net [64.85.239.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714EF43D2F for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:12:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rchopra@cal.berkeley.edu) Received: from cal.berkeley.edu (astound-64-85-244-72.ca.astound.net [64.85.244.72]) by m00.ca.astound.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0B8CPKL015484; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:12:25 -0800 Message-ID: <40010547.7000304@cal.berkeley.edu> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:11:51 -0800 From: Rishi Chopra User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Maltese References: <3FDA7D20.1010904@cal.berkeley.edu> <02cc01c3c12b$2c81bb80$f4f0a8c0@pcmedx.com> In-Reply-To: <02cc01c3c12b$2c81bb80$f4f0a8c0@pcmedx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (Yet Another) Home Networking Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:12:58 -0000 I was able to get my network up and running with the suggestions below. To review, my setup is the following: ISP FreeBSD Gateway Win2k Box >----------rl0--------------rl1-------------------< ALL DHCP 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.2 rl0 is connected to the modem by ethernet and set for DHCP, the ISP's method of address asignment. rl1 is the second NIC in the BSD box, and is connected by crossover cable to the Win2k box. FreeBSD box and Win2k box can successfully ping each other, and both FreeBSD box and Win2k have working internet access. Everything is running A-OK. If I wish to host WinVNC on the Win2k box, do I need to make any changes to the Gateway? Specifically, WinVNC requires the Win2k box to be listening on 5800 and 5900; I have opened these ports (and these ports only) on the Win2k box. Do I need to change rc.conf or any other files on the gateway to specify that all incoming connections on 5800 and 5900 be forwarded from rl0 to rl1? Am I gonna have to step up to IPFW (yuck!) ?? Thanks, Rishi Mike Maltese wrote: >>(1) in /etc/rc.conf, I added the following >> natd_enable="YES" >> natd_interface="rl0" ### public interface connected to cable modem >> gateway_enable="YES" >> defaultrouter="192.168.0.1" ### LAN machines use this >> ifconfig_rl0="DHCP" ### Astound uses dhcp >> ifconfig_rl1="inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" ### use for LAN >> hostname="idfubar.dyndns.org" >> >> > >As a first step, try adding these lines to rc.conf: > >firewall_enable="YES" >firewall_type="open" > >This will enable diversion of all traffic to natd. Read the man pages for >natd and ipfw and >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls.html >for more information. > >The easiest way to reinitialize the system is to type "shutdown now". This >will drop you into single user mode. Press return when prompted for a shell. >Hit Ctrl+D and the rc system will be run through and put you back into >multi-user mode. Check for connectivity from the router and the Windows box. > >As a side note, you can delete the defaultrouter entry. That's for your >FreeBSD box, not LAN clients. It's getting reset by dhclient when it gets >lease information from your ISP's DHCP server anyway. > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 00:37:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F45C16A4D0; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:37:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from smithers.nildram.co.uk (smithers.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD1343D5D; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:37:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nullentropy@lineone.net) Received: from lineone.net (orbital.gotadsl.co.uk [81.6.215.230]) by smithers.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 277BB24D83A; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:33:56 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <40010A71.9040809@lineone.net> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:33:53 +0000 From: Robert Downes User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7a) Gecko/20040106 X-Accept-Language: en, fr, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: CVSup checkout mode for FreeBSD doc tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:37:58 -0000 The quick start instructions for the FreeBSD documentation project say 2. Get a local copy of the FreeBSD doc tree. Either use CVSup in checkout mode to do this, or get a full copy of the CVS repository locally. I have, so far, used CVSup to reconcile sources and ports and docs, but I'm confused now. According to the man page for CVSup, checkout mode is not the default, and will only be used if a tag or a date are specified. If I want to obey the instruction from the documentation project, what do I want to do with my /etc/cvsupfile if mine currently looks like this: *default host=cvsup.uk.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs *default tag=RELENG_5_2 *default delete use-rel-suffix src-all *default tag=. ports-all doc-all At the moment, the doc section does not seem to have a tag, so does that mean I'm not using checkout mode to update my doc tree? -- Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 00:45:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA69B16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:45:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58FE443D45 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:45:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i0B8jgi29566; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:45:43 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: Matt Bjornson , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:45:42 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401110045.42038.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: aic7xxx/FreeBSD/Linux can't find disk drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:45:57 -0000 On Saturday 10 January 2004 09:06 pm, Matt Bjornson wrote: > I have a Dell PowerEdge 2400 with dual 733 Mhx CPUs. I have tried > to install several distros of Linux (Red Hat 9.0 and Gentoo 1.4) > and FreeBSD 4.8, 5.0 and while I can get the kernels to recognize > the Adaptec 7890 and the Adaptec 7880 and use my scsi CDROM, when I > fdisk to try to create partitions, I receive a unable to find > /dev/sda Thanks > All of the scsi disks I ever had were refered to as /dev/da... Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 00:55:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFBF916A506 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:55:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (sea1-f129.sea1.hotmail.com [207.68.163.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1A243D39 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:55:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from crollins666@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:55:55 -0800 Received: from 216.19.22.118 by sea1fd.sea1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:55:55 GMT X-Originating-IP: [216.19.22.118] X-Originating-Email: [crollins666@hotmail.com] X-Sender: crollins666@hotmail.com From: "clayton rollins" To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:55:55 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2004 08:55:55.0487 (UTC) FILETIME=[B93D6EF0:01C3D820] cc: jason@monsterjam.org Subject: Re: gtk-gnutella-0.93.2 crashing frequently.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:55:57 -0000 Quoting Jason : > >anyone else seeing this app dumping core very frequently? >a core file can be seen at >http://monsterjam.org/core/ > >the previous version I portupgraded from 0.91 I believe was working fine >and dandy before I "portupgraded" it. > >regards, >Jason > Hi Jason, I can't access your core file (probably permissions). It probably wouldn't help much, as I would need to reproduce the executable it came from, and code. The crash output would be more useful, for me. At any rate, the problem you're experiencing is likely due to a bug reported recently, which causes a segfault when running the gtk1 version on freebsd. (Without getting too far into it, a widget with 7 items is hard-coded with 5 items. The problem wasn't noticed in advance as the dev.s mostly use linux. I use the gtk2 version, so I was unaware of the bug.) For fixing, there are three or four options for you. 1. Get and compile the newest cvs. (which is currently in freeze for a bugfix release.) This will also fix a minor memory leak that was discovered recently. Get a snapshot here: http://gtk-gnutella.sourceforge.net/index.php?page=devel#devel-snapshots Run: ./Configure -d -e -Dyacc='bison -y' -Dofficial='true' -Dprefix=${PREFIX} -Dbindir=${PREFIX}/bin -Dprivlib=${PREFIX}/share/gtk-gnutella -Dsysman=${PREFIX}/man/man1 -Dlocale=${PREFIX}/share/locale -Dccflags='${CFLAGS} -I${LOCALBASE}/include/' (note 1: the above are defaults for the port.) (note 2: if ICU is installed, you will need to run interactively (remove -d) and remove the linking to -licuuc, or edit it out in the Configure script.) then make && make install, as usual. 2. find a package from the previous release in ports (0.93). This was a very recent update, and it is likely there are good package builds out there. 3. Wait a few days. As I mentioned, a serious bug was found in the gtk1 version, and a bugfix release is imminent. The port will be updated as soon as the source is available. 4. compile a gtk2 version. Using gtk2 takes quite a bit of cpu (I'd say, don't bother if you have less than 600 MHz), but should allow you to run... (Use WITH_GTK2 to do.) On behalf of the gtk-g project, I would like to formally apologize. Many new people have joined the dev. team, and some issues with memory leaks, etc., have been occuring with some frequency. While work is being achieved at a much faster rate than ever before, this also means that undiscovered bugs enter the code more than ever before. In response, a new policy of doing a 'code freeze' before release has been instituted now, and newer version should, hopefully, show less and less of this. (Keep in mind the software only purports to be "beta quality") One criticism for you, though. Your statement that "0.91 I believe was working fine" is a *very* bad point of view. Gnutella is an evolving protocol, and frequent updates of the client software are a neccesity. In fact, version 0.91 is considered fully deprecated, and other gtk-gnutella nodes will not even connect to you. (Their existence is considered harmful to the network.) I don't want to scold you or anything, but that is a common thought that, really, *must* end. Regards, Clayton Rollins PS. sorry for taking some time to respond. I only get this list in digest form, so didn't see your post immediately. On the same note, be sure to cc any replies directly to me. PPS. If you need personal assistance, help is available on #gtk-gnutella on freenode.net. _________________________________________________________________ Let the new MSN Premium Internet Software make the most of your high-speed experience. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=byoa/prem&ST=1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 01:14:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D724916A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:14:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (blackend.org [212.11.35.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B911143D4C; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:14:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from abigail.blackend.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by abigail.blackend.org (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i0B9EJ6F030051; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:14:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marc@abigail.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by abigail.blackend.org (8.12.9/8.12.3/Submit) id i0B9EEcJ030050; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:14:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marc) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:14:14 +0100 From: Marc Fonvieille To: Robert Downes Message-ID: <20040111101414.A29976@abigail.blackend.org> References: <40010A71.9040809@lineone.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <40010A71.9040809@lineone.net>; from nullentropy@lineone.net on Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 08:33:53AM +0000 X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CVSup checkout mode for FreeBSD doc tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:14:24 -0000 On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 08:33:53AM +0000, Robert Downes wrote: > The quick start instructions for the FreeBSD documentation project say > > 2. Get a local copy of the FreeBSD doc tree. Either use CVSup in > checkout mode to do this, or get a full copy of the CVS repository locally. > > I have, so far, used CVSup to reconcile sources and ports and docs, but > I'm confused now. According to the man page for CVSup, checkout mode is > not the default, and will only be used if a tag or a date are specified. > If I want to obey the instruction from the documentation project, what > do I want to do with my /etc/cvsupfile if mine currently looks like this: > > *default host=cvsup.uk.FreeBSD.org > *default base=/usr > *default prefix=/usr > *default release=cvs > *default tag=RELENG_5_2 > *default delete use-rel-suffix > > src-all > *default tag=. > ports-all > doc-all > > > At the moment, the doc section does not seem to have a tag, so does that > mean I'm not using checkout mode to update my doc tree? > The right tag for docs is . (period), one could say that doc is "-CURRENT". I wrote a quick guide on how to keep your docs up to date, maybe it could help you: http://www.bsdnews.org/02/freebsd_doc.php Marc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 01:46:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FE5316A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:46:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from neostrada.pl (uc171.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [80.54.83.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFC243D45 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:46:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zaphod@neostrada.pl) Received: by neostrada.pl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AFF3540C4; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:42:43 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:42:43 +0100 From: Bernard El-Hagin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040111094243.GA1114@hoth> References: <20040110221036.GA44130@tao.thought.org> <20040110223308.GA4881@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040110223907.GA16659@Uruk-Hai.Sanitarium.mine.nu> <20040110230218.GA5347@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <6.0.0.22.0.20040110182450.0a09ce58@pop.face2interface.com> <20040110233645.GA5668@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040110233645.GA5668@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: perl script question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:46:15 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 06:26:30PM -0500, Marty Landman wrote: > > At 06:02 PM 1/10/2004, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > >On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:39:07PM +0100, Bj?rn Andersson wrote: > > > > > >> If this occures more than once on a line we should have the line as this: > > >> perl -pi.bak -e 's/\s+\w+_\w+\.?//g;' filename > > > > > >Good point. Also, if the stuff_separated_by_underscores wraps around > > >onto more than one line, then there may not be any leading whitespace: > > > > I don't see why the translate sol'tn that Gary Kline gave first isn't > > adequate. > > Err --- Gary Kline was the OP asking how to do this: I think you mean > Bernard El-Hagin's solution? > > % perl -i.bak -pe 'tr/_/ /' > > That doesn't do the right thing. It turns: > > "This is a sample ordinary sentence. This_is_joined_up_with_underscores." > > into: > > "This is a sample ordinary sentence. This is joined up with underscores." > > but the requirement is to produce: > > "This is a sample ordinary sentence." Yes, I completely misread the question. Sorry. -- Cheers, Bernard From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 02:03:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9646816A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:03:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net (stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD3C43D54 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:03:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 22-15.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.22.15] helo=yoda.datawok.com) by stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AfcQs-0003eG-00; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 02:02:58 -0800 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: Jez Hancock Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 04:02:56 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200401101939.44526.algould@datawok.com> <200401110001.22135.algould@datawok.com> <20040111075511.GB58914@users.munk.nu> In-Reply-To: <20040111075511.GB58914@users.munk.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401110402.56239.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b5af5292a9ee7a137565611c26f994262350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tail tip to Fortune? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:03:03 -0000 On Sunday 11 January 2004 01:55 am, Jez Hancock wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 12:01:22AM -0600, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > > On Saturday 10 January 2004 07:39 pm, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > > > On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Dan Nelson wrote: > > > > In the last episode (Jan 09), Dru said: > > > > > I remember coming across a trick (which I can't find now) which > > > > > allowed you to page all of a file, except for the first 10 lines. I > > > > > think it used a combo of head and tail to achieve this. I can't > > > > > just use tail as the length of the file varies whereas the amount I > > > > > don't want to see doesn't. > > > > > > > > tail +11 myfile > > > > > > Could we get this one into the Fortune tips that appear at user login? > > > > > > Andrew Gould > > > > Please disregard -- I figured out how to add my own fortune file. > > FWIW you can do something like this: > > fortune -m tail freebsd-tips > > to display all tips in the freebsd-tips fortune file that contain > 'tail'. > > As it turns out there is this tip: > > To see the last 10 lines of a long file, use "tail filename". To see the > first 10 lines, use "head filename". > -- Dru > > which is almost what you're asking about :P Thanks. Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 03:00:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D544A16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 03:00:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from holodoc.ip.se (ua-213-115-163-137.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [213.115.163.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F6843D46 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 03:00:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rd@tilde.se) Received: by holodoc.ip.se (Postfix, from userid 103) id 085E712845A; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:58:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from nyalaptopen (c-f79572d5.02-85-73746f13.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [213.114.149.247]) by holodoc.ip.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B409128450 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:58:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <00a301c3d832$16a40c00$7001010a@nyalaptopen> From: "Rickard Dahlstrand" To: Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:00:12 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Sanitizer: This message has been sanitized! Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: automatic dump and restore over X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:00:26 -0000 Hi, I think I have a plan for upgrading a large number of computers over the ne= twork. I would really appreciate some help finding flaws in this idea. All the servers is installed with one partition for /, one for /var/. When = I do the initial install I move the /etc to /var/etc and synlink /etc to po= int at /var/etc. This should make the / partition exactly the same on all t= he servers. On the reference server (where I do all the upgrades) I then use dump to c= reate a file from the / partition. This file is the zipped and moved to my = laptop from installation on all the other servers. The laptop is then connected to the same network as the server that needs u= pgrading. The laptop is running DHCP, TFTP and NFS services. All servers are set to boot using PXE and once I reboot it the server boots= an image from the laptop containing a picobsd dist with a modified startup= script.=20 This script automatically mounts the hard drive on the server and a directo= ry on the laptop containing the dump-file from the reference server. Then i= t uses restore to write the dump-file over the / partition on the server. After the upgrade is complete I reboot the server without the DHCP server a= ctive and the server should boot using the new / partition. Can this work? I have read that dump/restore is the best solution for backi= ng up disks. Could there be any problems using restore on a partition alrea= dy allocated? Thanks, Rickard. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 03:52:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA2416A4D0 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 03:52:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EEBA43D2D for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 03:52:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i0BBqcfn010994 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:52:38 GMT (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i0BBqbGd010993; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:52:37 GMT (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:52:37 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman To: Gary Kline Message-ID: <20040111115237.GA10388@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List References: <20040110221036.GA44130@tao.thought.org> <20040110223308.GA4881@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040110223907.GA16659@Uruk-Hai.Sanitarium.mine.nu> <20040110230218.GA5347@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040111013434.GC44177@tao.thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040111013434.GC44177@tao.thought.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: perl script question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:52:46 -0000 --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 05:34:34PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:02:18PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > perl -pi.bak -e 's/\s*\w+_\w+\.?//g;' filename > The lines do indeed wrap so this does the job on a test file. > I do have the re-exp book but this one is far ovr my head. > What do the "\s*" mean, and also thr "\.?/" ? OK. Time to disect a regular expression. Let's just isolate the RE bits from the surrounding stuff: \s*\w+_\w+\.? There are 5 parts to this: 1 \s* 2 \w+ 3 _ 4 \w+ 5 \.? 1) \s* -- '\s' is a metacharacter for matching whitespace: it's equivalent to saying [ \t\n\r\f]. The '*' operator says "any number of these, including zero". 2) \w+ -- '\w' is a metacharacter for matching 'word' characters. What it means is locale dependent, but if you're using the ASCII locale it corresponds to [a-zA-Z_0-9]. The '+' operator means "one or more or these". Note that while \w+ matches character sequences containing _, it will also match words that don't: hence 3) _ -- match a literal '_' character. ie. this forces the matched text to contain at least one underscore. 4) \w+ -- as (2) matches the rest of the stuff_separated_by_underscores after the underscore we've forced a match to[1]. 5) \.? -- \. matches a literal '.' It has to be escaped (with a \) because plain '.' on it's own is the used as the wildcard to match any character. The '?' operator means "optional", or more precisely, either zero or one of those. Now, the whole command: perl -pi.bak -e 's/${re}//g;' filename scans through the file line_by_line, matching strings_connected_with underscores on each line. Bj=F6rn Andersson noticed that you would need the 'g' option to the s/// substitution command which means "repeat this substitution more than once, if necessary". Like in the first line_of_this_paragraph. Then I realised that there were situations, like the last line of the previous paragraph, where there wouldn't be any leading whitespace to match. Of course, this all depends on the sequences of words_connected_with_ underscores not wrapping around onto more than one line, as in this contrived example, where the word 'underscores' on the second line of this paragraph wouldn't be deleted. There are several other edge cases like that, if word-wrap is permitted. But it was never specified if that was the case or not and I've assumed not because coping with that sort of thing is a bit trickier. Cheers, Matthew [1] In fact, due to the way regular expressions work, the literal underscore (3) will actually match at the last underscore out of all the stuff we're matching, and the stuff matched by chunk (4) won't contain any underscores. --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAATkFdtESqEQa7a0RAkx2AJwOPZIaSNARA5eKKccsjIVEAPj7LgCgmpYS tv8cf73LwBVCv24W8BEB0vw= =axTX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 04:06:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B1B16A4D0 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 04:06:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B5543D49 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 04:06:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i0BC60fn011086 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:06:00 GMT (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i0BC5xiS011085; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:05:59 GMT (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:05:59 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman To: Malcolm Kay Message-ID: <20040111120559.GB10388@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Malcolm Kay , ecrist@adtechintegrated.com, Bernard El-Hagin , FreeBSD Questions References: <20040110224342.23710.qmail@web13910.mail.yahoo.com> <200401101745.50544.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> <200401102348.41033.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> <200401111653.52614.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401111653.52614.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: ecrist@adtechintegrated.com cc: Bernard El-Hagin cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Download contents of http directory? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:06:08 -0000 --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 04:53:52PM +1030, Malcolm Kay wrote: > This raises a question for which I don't know the answer: > How does one list an http directory that does allow it? Basically, you shouldn't. If the web site administrator has set up index.html files or otherwise prevented you from generating a directory listing, it generally means that there's stuff in that directory which you aren't meant to access. It's impolite (at best) to try and get round that, although the wise admin will take stronger meansures to ensure that even if you can guess filenames, you still can't download anything you shouldn't. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAATwndtESqEQa7a0RAq/UAJ4lJtc1i9QSz9p2rmCM2oUo5kOkVACghTfR xylC6kfzIu6bL8Mr6Dqd7vw= =m05a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 04:51:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E4E16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 04:51:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7695C43D46 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 04:51:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i0BCpEfn011337 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:51:14 GMT (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i0BCpE6j011336; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:51:14 GMT (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:51:14 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman To: Rickard Dahlstrand Message-ID: <20040111125114.GC10388@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Rickard Dahlstrand , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <00a301c3d832$16a40c00$7001010a@nyalaptopen> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="R+My9LyyhiUvIEro" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00a301c3d832$16a40c00$7001010a@nyalaptopen> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: automatic dump and restore over X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:51:21 -0000 --R+My9LyyhiUvIEro Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 12:00:12PM +0100, Rickard Dahlstrand wrote: > All the servers is installed with one partition for /, one for /var/. Whe= n I do the initial install I move the /etc to /var/etc and synlink /etc to = point at /var/etc. This should make the / partition exactly the same on all= the servers. If you move /etc like this, you'll make the machines so treated unbootable. There's critical stuff in /etc that has to be in the root partition for the boot process to be able to find it. > On the reference server (where I do all the upgrades) I then use dump to= create a file from the / partition. This file is the zipped and moved to m= y laptop from installation on all the other servers. >=20 > The laptop is then connected to the same network as the server that needs= upgrading. The laptop is running DHCP, TFTP and NFS services. >=20 > All servers are set to boot using PXE and once I reboot it the server boo= ts an image from the laptop containing a picobsd dist with a modified start= up script.=20 >=20 > This script automatically mounts the hard drive on the server and a direc= tory on the laptop containing the dump-file from the reference server. Then= it uses restore to write the dump-file over the / partition on the server. >=20 > After the upgrade is complete I reboot the server without the DHCP server= active and the server should boot using the new / partition. >=20 > Can this work? I have read that dump/restore is the best solution for bac= king up disks. Could there be any problems using restore on a partition alr= eady allocated? It strikes me as a lot more complicated than the recommended method, which is to designate one machine as a 'build box', where you build all of the OS and kernels you need. You then NFS export /usr/src and /usr/obj and mount them on the machine you want to update. Then you can use 'make installkernel', 'make installworld' and 'mergemaster' to do the update. Possibly with a few other steps here and there -- for full instructions start with: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/small-lan.html However, if you decide to stick with your first idea, then I'd make a few changes: i) Copy the contents of /etc to your /var as a backup. Leave the original /etc in place on the root partition. If you're going to be doing this sort of thing regularly, then you can set up a cron(8) job: the net/rsync port will let you do the copies very efficiently. ii) Before you rewrite your root partition, you should run newfs(8) on it to blank it. restore(8) can overwrite a populated partition, but it works best given an empty filesystem. =20 iii) After you've restored your example root partition, copy back the contents of /etc. Note that this will wipe out any updates to files within /etc which came as part of the upgrade. mergemaster(8) will help you fix things up, or you can be selective about what contents of /etc you actually keep backed up --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --R+My9LyyhiUvIEro Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAAUbCdtESqEQa7a0RAmsYAKCKUgPTsuU9KgU2RAPeoAiW2E7kawCdHSx9 zXTV2XMus4rlzewc9+XGvBA= =wN6A -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --R+My9LyyhiUvIEro-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 05:19:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B6E16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 05:19:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (sea1-f126.sea1.hotmail.com [207.68.163.126]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C7F43D41 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 05:19:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from c_longfoot@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 05:19:56 -0800 Received: from 80.138.128.18 by sea1fd.sea1.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:19:56 GMT X-Originating-IP: [80.138.128.18] X-Originating-Email: [c_longfoot@hotmail.com] X-Sender: c_longfoot@hotmail.com From: "Carolyn Longfoot" To: cswiger@mac.com Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:19:56 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2004 13:19:56.0533 (UTC) FILETIME=[9B3D3A50:01C3D845] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What are _p. files that break installworld? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:19:58 -0000 ARRGGGHH I knew it was something simple like this. I compiled on one box and installed on another, so /etc/make.conf on one was used during compile and another make.conf during install. Big trap. Thanks a lot! Caro >From: Chuck Swiger >The _p.a files are profiled versions of the libraries, although their >absence normally doesn't cause any problems. You may have "NOPROFILE=true" >set in your /etc/make.conf, or you may have had it set when building world >but not when you tried the installworld. > >-- >-Chuck _________________________________________________________________ Get a FREE online virus check for your PC here, from McAfee. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 05:49:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D6416A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 05:49:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F0E43D41 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 05:48:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp104-184.lns1.adl1.internode.on.net [150.101.104.184])i0BDmqqR008269; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:18:54 +1030 (CST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Malcolm Kay Organization: At home To: Matthew Seaman Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:18:52 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <20040110224342.23710.qmail@web13910.mail.yahoo.com> <200401111653.52614.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> <20040111120559.GB10388@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20040111120559.GB10388@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200401120018.52511.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> cc: ecrist@adtechintegrated.com cc: Bernard El-Hagin cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Download contents of http directory? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:49:01 -0000 On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:35, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 04:53:52PM +1030, Malcolm Kay wrote: > > This raises a question for which I don't know the answer: > > How does one list an http directory that does allow it? > > Basically, you shouldn't. If the web site administrator has set up > index.html files or otherwise prevented you from generating a > directory listing, it generally means that there's stuff in that > directory which you aren't meant to access. It's impolite (at best) > to try and get round that, although the wise admin will take stronger > meansures to ensure that even if you can guess filenames, you still > can't download anything you shouldn't. > Please reread my query -- I'm asking how to read the directory=20 when the administrator does allow it. Malcolm Kay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 06:34:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0740316A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 06:34:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3823343D58 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 06:34:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from thomas.pasch@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 1034 invoked by uid 65534); 11 Jan 2004 14:34:24 -0000 Received: from p508E75DB.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO pourquoi.netzgeneration.com) (80.142.117.219) by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 11 Jan 2004 15:34:24 +0100 X-Authenticated: #2928575 From: Thomas Pasch To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:34:25 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401111534.25561.thomas.pasch@gmx.de> Subject: Using a usb compact flash card reader X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:34:28 -0000 Hello, I'm successfully using a usb compact flash card reader with FreeBSD-5.2-RC2/amd64. It is a _intern_ reader (and because of this constantly attached to the usb bus). However, I can only use it when I plug the memory card in BEFORE BOOTING. When I try to attach the memory card later, it will not be found. I wonder if a could use the "camcontrol" command somehow to simulate the "reattachment of the usb device" so that my card gets recognized even if I plug it in AFTER BOOT. For this to happen, I should somehow query the device size like it is done in the following snippet of dmesg: GEOM: create disk da0 dp=0xffffff001da24c68 GEOM: create disk da1 dp=0xffffff0000bb2868 GEOM: create disk da2 dp=0xffffff0000c53468 GEOM: create disk da3 dp=0xffffff0000c74068 da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 1.000MB/s transfers da0: 244MB (500736 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 244C) da1 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 1 da1: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device da1: 1.000MB/s transfers da1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present Anyone got an idea. Cheers, Thomas PS: Yes, I tried "camcontrol rescan 0:0:0" and "camcontrol start 0:0:0" but nothing much happend. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 06:36:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967F916A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 06:36:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AB8343D45 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 06:36:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from thomas.pasch@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 23998 invoked by uid 65534); 11 Jan 2004 14:36:51 -0000 Received: from p508E75DB.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO pourquoi.netzgeneration.com) (80.142.117.219) by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 11 Jan 2004 15:36:51 +0100 X-Authenticated: #2928575 From: Thomas Pasch To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:36:47 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-00=_/9VAAf8L5Uwb5v1" Message-Id: <200401111536.47485.thomas.pasch@gmx.de> X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Sane USB problem with HP ScanJet 5300C on FreeBSD-5.2-RC2/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:36:54 -0000 --Boundary-00=_/9VAAf8L5Uwb5v1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hello, =A0 =A0I'm trying to get my scanner to work on FreeBSD 5.2-RC2/amd64. I can "se= e" =A0the scanner with sane-find-scanner and usbdevs but scanimage seems to ha= ng. =A0 =A0I'm using the sane-backends-1.0.12_3 and sane-frontends-1.0.11 and =A0libusb-0.1.7_1 from the package tree (but also tried ports and a newer =A0backends version as well). =A0 =A0See attached the DEBUG output of "scanimage -L". For me it looks like =A0the scanner is found and a request is written to it, but there is never = an =A0anwer. =A0 =A0Beside, how do I use libusb on 5.2? The man pages are saying something =A0about creating /dev/ugen* but as 5.2 uses devfs, you can't create it and= it =A0isn't there. =A0 =A0Cheers, =A0 =A0aanno --Boundary-00=_/9VAAf8L5Uwb5v1-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 07:07:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED2316A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:07:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from gaff.hhhr.ision.net (gaff.hhhr.ision.net [195.180.9.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960D043D49 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:03:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ohoyer@gaff.hhhr.ision.net) Received: from gaff.hhhr.ision.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gaff.hhhr.ision.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0BF3aOL030264 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:03:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ohoyer@gaff.hhhr.ision.net) Received: from localhost (ohoyer@localhost)i0BExWw4030255; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:03:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ohoyer@gaff.hhhr.ision.net) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:59:32 +0100 (CET) From: Olaf Hoyer To: Eivind Hestnes In-Reply-To: <1311.158.38.100.106.1073566079.squirrel@webmail.stabbursmoen.no> Message-ID: <20040111155759.C30207@gaff.hhhr.ision.net> References: <1311.158.38.100.106.1073566079.squirrel@webmail.stabbursmoen.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Custom kernel config for Dell PowerEdge 1750 w/RAID X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:07:38 -0000 On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, Eivind Hestnes wrote: > Hi, > > Anyone out there with a complete custom kernel config for the Dell > PowerEdge 1750 w/PERC4 RAID-controller (one of those pizzaboxes :-) Well, the GENERIC will work fine, just strip out the surplus bits of drivers ;-) You will need at least 4.9-pre to get the bge's to work properly, support for those was merged in somewhere between 4.8 and 4.9-pre. (New Chip revision with different PCI ID) HTH Olaf -- Olaf Hoyer ohoyer@gaff.hhhr.ision.net Fuerchterliche Erlebniss geben zu raten, ob der, welcher sie erlebt, nicht etwas Fuerchterliches ist. (Nietzsche, Jenseits von Gut und Boese) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 07:26:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3831316A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:26:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from dallypost.com (ns1.dallypost.com [12.160.224.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC9843D60 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:24:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lance@dallypost.com) Received: from dallypost.com (DallyPost [127.0.0.1] (may be forged)) by dallypost.com (8.12.8/8.12.5) with ESMTP id i0BGad2O030260; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:36:39 -0700 Received: (from apache@localhost) by dallypost.com (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0BGadi5030258; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:36:39 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: dallypost.com: apache set sender to lance@dallypost.com using -f Received: from 66.82.160.1 (SquirrelMail authenticated user lance) by www.dallypost.com with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:36:39 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <13982.66.82.160.1.1073838999.squirrel@www.dallypost.com> In-Reply-To: <200401102255.23969.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> References: <4554.66.82.160.1.1073789393.squirrel@www.dallypost.com> <200401101949.59899.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> <1024.66.82.166.202.1073794678.squirrel@www.dallypost.com> <200401102255.23969.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:36:39 -0700 (MST) From: "Lance Earl" To: ecrist@adtechintegrated.com User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: lance@dallypost.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:26:16 -0000 The Monitor section of XF86Config includes Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "Monitor Vendor" Model Name "Monitor Model" HorizSync 31.0 -70.0 VertRefresh 55.0 - 120.0 My Monitor is a NEC FE700+ so these settings seem to be correct. I see taht the refresh rates are not in quotes like the other items, is this correct? I forgot to mention that during install, after running the xconfig setup and saving the files, it said that the setup appeared to have failed and gave me a chance to try again. I tried several times but with the same result. I am running Version 4.8 but thought that I may try version 5.1 to see if I get a better result. Thanks Eric F Crist said: > On Saturday 10 January 2004 10:17 pm, Lance Earl wrote: >> Hi Eric, >> >> We are 1 for 2. I got it so that it will load gnome with startx. > > Glad to hear it! > >> >> The flicker problems on the screen persist and now appear to be the case >> 100% of the time. Restarting the machine no longer seems to correct the >> problem. Do you have any additional suggestions? >> > > Yes. Check the manual for your monitor's refresh rate and make sure you > setup > XFree86 for the correct numbers. This is usually 60 Hz or 72Hz, depending > on > the resolution you set. > > >> I am considering FreeBSD as the OS for our internet server because >> RedHat >> is no longer a viable solution. I just do not like the direction of the >> company. We run Apache, Sendmail, PHP, MySQL, Squirrel Mail and Image >> Magick. I have also considered Debian as a possible candidate. Do you >> have >> any suggestions regarding these two options? > > Yes. I use FreeBSD on my servers. I'm currently in the process of a > physical > move/ISP change, so they're hosted on another set of servers (linux, of > unknow vendor), so they're not under my control ATM. I've been running > FreeBSD as a web server since 1998. It has been 100% secure for me, even > when I was running a 'questionable' server with a domain name of > ardent-hacker.net. Also, the support here for FreeBSD is great! > > HTH > -- > Eric F Crist > AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc > (612) 998-3588 Lance Earl DallyPost, Inc. 208-548-2721 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 07:50:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C6F16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:50:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (sea2-f43.sea2.hotmail.com [207.68.165.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007E843D45 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:50:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mgmcomm@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 07:50:03 -0800 Received: from 68.72.154.25 by sea2fd.sea2.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:50:03 GMT X-Originating-IP: [68.72.154.25] X-Originating-Email: [mgmcomm@hotmail.com] X-Sender: mgmcomm@hotmail.com From: "mgmcomm @hotmail.com" To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:50:03 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2004 15:50:03.0708 (UTC) FILETIME=[93EF0FC0:01C3D85A] Subject: sendmail aliases not worked as expected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:50:06 -0000 I am having trouble getting /etc/mail/aliases to properly forward system messages such as cron or periodic events. Actually this problem affects even mail input using the mail command or any other method. Although the cron/periodic is what I require the most. When a cron or periodic task creates an email to say root...it gets mailed to root@host.domain.com instead of root@domain.com. Which results in an error message Jan 7 03:03:01 butters sm-mta[1511]: i07331me001498: SYSERR(root): butters.kibserv.org. config error: mail loops back to me (MX problem?) A bounce message is generated and sends cleanly to postmaster@kibserv.org. The original message is removed from the queue...apparently this error is fatal to the original message. my alias file contains the following root: root@kibserv.org seti: root@kibserv.org kib: mgmcomm@hotmail.com virtualuser: mgmcomm@hotmail.com and many other entries...most are the defaults in the original file enabled and almost all eventually point to root anyhow. And yes I have run newaliases and received successful and positive response. 10:17am butters:/etc/mail # newaliases /etc/mail/aliases: 38 aliases, longest 22 bytes, 504 bytes total This problem seemed to start about the time I upgrades from 4.7 to 5.2. Presently I am loosely tracking current...usually up to a month behind with a 1 week run on a test box. I plan to track 5-stable as soon as I see it since I am too deep into 5.x features to go back to 4.x now. Current is not really all I bargained for :) 10:25am butters:/etc/mail # uname -a FreeBSD butters 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #3: Tue Dec 16 19:32:35 UTC 2003 root@butters:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM i386 in my rc.conf file I thought maybe my sendmail options were wrong. historically I have used: sendmail_enable="YES" but after reading the defaults and the rc.sendmail file I find that this option is exclusive of two other sendmail options sendmail_submit_enable and sendmail_outbound_enable So I tried each in turn with no change in result. But since I can't find much documentation on these other than what I can make from the rc.sendmail I might still just be using the wrong rc.conf the wrong way. It seems to me that sendmail is completely ignoring the /etc/mail/aliases file Even when I try to send mail to kib (a real user) or the virtualuser the mail always tries to go to user@host.domain.com...which eventually bounces and gets attached to a message to the postmaster. I suppose the aliases are not completely ignored because no mail ever gets to the local user mail accounts. Also note that the kibserv.org is an old domain no longer registered...but we still use it for testing purposes. To prove this is not a dns related issue here is a few digs. Our local dns server has all the correct records. 10:29am butters:/etc/mail # dig kibserv.org mx ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> kibserv.org mx ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 64231 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; kibserv.org, type = MX, class = IN ;; ANSWER SECTION: kibserv.org. 1H IN MX 10 mail.kibserv.org. ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: kibserv.org. 1H IN NS 10.0.0.5. ;; Total query time: 2 msec ;; FROM: butters to SERVER: 10.0.0.5 ;; WHEN: Sun Jan 11 10:36:51 2004 ;; MSG SIZE sent: 29 rcvd: 72 10:36am butters:/etc/mail # dig mail.kibserv.org ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> mail.kibserv.org ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 63182 ;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUERY SECTION: ;; mail.kibserv.org, type = A, class = IN ;; ANSWER SECTION: mail.kibserv.org. 1H IN CNAME stan.kibserv.org. stan.kibserv.org. 1H IN A 10.0.0.8 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: kibserv.org. 1H IN NS 10.0.0.5. ;; Total query time: 3 msec ;; FROM: butters to SERVER: 10.0.0.5 ;; WHEN: Sun Jan 11 10:37:15 2004 ;; MSG SIZE sent: 34 rcvd: 91 10:37am butters:/etc/mail # Well I can't think of anything else that might apply here. I hope I didn't go into too much detail making this unreadbale. But I suppose too much is better than not enough. As soon as I can get the mail server to accept these messages I will be allowed to roll our domains to this new mail server and I can finally get off hotmail and have a real pop3 account for a change. And please reply to or cc me as my hotmail account is not on the list anymore. It fills up so fast that the mailing list gets bounded messages and drops me every couple days if I don't keep deleting mail. Its become too much of a hassle. Thanks Jason Cribbins _________________________________________________________________ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 08:05:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B4A16A4D0 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:05:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net [68.76.19.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9577B43D48 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:05:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from luke@foolishgames.com) Received: from [192.168.2.49] (adsl-67-36-56-113.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net [67.36.56.113]) (authenticated bits=0)ESMTP id i0BG5W68003882; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:05:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from luke@foolishgames.com) X-Authentication-Warning: adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net: Host adsl-67-36-56-113.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net [67.36.56.113] claimed to be [192.168.2.49] In-Reply-To: <200401120018.52511.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> References: <20040110224342.23710.qmail@web13910.mail.yahoo.com> <200401111653.52614.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> <20040111120559.GB10388@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <200401120018.52511.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <078AEAC8-4450-11D8-864F-000A95EFF4CA@foolishgames.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Lucas Holt Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:05:52 -0500 To: Malcolm Kay X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.609) cc: ecrist@adtechintegrated.com cc: Bernard El-Hagin cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Download contents of http directory? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:05:39 -0000 If the admin does allow downloading, you will simply see the list by typing the path to the directory in the url you wish to look at. For example, lets say that you have a directory /music/ . If the webserver has directory listings on, you can simply type http://www.mydomain.com/music/ and it will automatically generate a list of all the files and return it to the viewer as an html page with hyperlinks. This behavior exists in most webservers including apache and IIS. Personally, I always turn it off. If i want someone to access a file, i give them a link to it. Apache has a directive in the config file for this. For the other question about downloading mp3's: I'm a bit unclear. Are the mp3's turned into real audio files or streamed by a real audio server? Is it just that your computer is using real player to play the files that are in fact mp3s? If the files are streamed by a real server, you will need a program to get them easily that can talk the protocol and collect the stream. If the files are somewhat hidden on the webserver, you will need the url to download them. If its just real player that is playing them, look at the html source for the page list and paste the link into a terminal.. fetch or wget should be able to grab them. If you are clicking on a link and then real player is spawning, you might be able to right click on the link and hit "save target as..." to save the original file. That would also work to get a real player playlist to get the real url of the files provided the person used an old version of real player. RAM files are usually text files that contain a url to a file. Give real player that file, and it will stream the file. I used to use that trick on one of my sites. Lucas Holt Luke@FoolishGames.com ________________________________________________________ FoolishGames.com (Jewel Fan Site) JustJournal.com (Free blogging) 'Re-implementing what I designed in 1979 is not interesting to me personally. For kids who are 20 years younger than me, Linux is a great way to cut your teeth. It's a cultural phenomenon and a business phenomenon. Mac OS X is a rock-solid system that's beautifully designed. I much prefer it to Linux.' -- Bill Joy, Wired Article 2003 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 08:14:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B17B916A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:14:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (A17-250-248-83.apple.com [17.250.248.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F84D43D39 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:14:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iripley@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin08-en2 [10.13.10.153]) by smtpout.mac.com (8.12.6/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id i0BGJZjs028796 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:19:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mac.com (adsl-63-201-88-107.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.201.88.107]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin08/MantshX 3.0) with ESMTP id i0BGDwTR001343 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:14:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 21:18:31 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553) From: Ian Ripley To: questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <6DF90386-432C-11D8-AA07-000393D3FED0@mac.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Installation Process X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:14:10 -0000 While trying to boot from the 5.2 miniinst ISO the CD started booting but only reached "Verifying DMI Pool Data ........" Boot from ATAPI CD-ROM : 1. FD 2.88MB System Type-(00) Any ideas would be appreciated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 08:21:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93E216A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:21:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (sea2-f59.sea2.hotmail.com [207.68.165.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A95E43D64 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:20:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mgmcomm@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:20:35 -0800 Received: from 68.72.154.25 by sea2fd.sea2.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:20:34 GMT X-Originating-IP: [68.72.154.25] X-Originating-Email: [mgmcomm@hotmail.com] X-Sender: mgmcomm@hotmail.com From: "mgmcomm @hotmail.com" To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:20:34 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2004 16:20:35.0019 (UTC) FILETIME=[D77AF1B0:01C3D85E] Subject: scanning for bad blocks before install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:21:03 -0000 I have read many messages concerning the topic of bad blocks...most of them more than 4 years old and quite obsolete now. And I have read the faq and understand about "modern" ide drives and the automatic block mapping and the fact that my drive in question is quite possible past saving. What I need to know is how to detect a drive with bad blocks before I put it into service. Here is what just happened to me...and could possible happen again. I took an old 10GB drive off the shell that has been unused for some time because I needed some quick temp storage while I move files around other drives. I used the sysinstall utility to fdisk in DD mode and create a single slice covering the entire drive....pretty much standard for any freebsd disks I employ now a days. everything went perfect and no error were indicated whatsoever. I began coping file...about 9.5 gigs to free up some space on another drive so I can continue downloads. My intention is to move all these downloaded to cdr eventually. I began to test these files on the 10gb drive since there are video fansubs (usually avi files) and I wanted to ensure there were no errors or bad encoding since I was getting these from gnutella. it was during these tests that I discovered quite a few corrupted files....and for one such group of files I had an sfv file to check against. But upon using gsfv the system bogs down to the point where I have to hard reset to recover. Thinking gsfv is doing something bad I try chsfv and then I see the hard disk errors. Aparently quite a few bad blocks on this 10GB drive exist and there was no indication of a problem until an actual read was attempted. Now what is wrong with this scenario is this. Why doesn't fdisk and or bsdlabel do some sort of bad black scan before allowing a user to put a drive into service. I cant even find an option to do this manually in either fdisk or fsck. I have read many archived messages were people want a way to mark bad blocks as unusable and there is apparently no way to do this other than badsect(8). So far I cant find a successful method of finding the exact block or sector number to feed to badsect(8). I have read that dd if=/dev/ad1s1a of=/dev/null will print errors with sector numbers as it finds one it cat read. But all this produced was hard read errors that said nothing about the location the failed read. Understanding this drive is a lost cause I would like to see if I can make use of it for at least the next week or so until I can get start getting this data to cdr. Luckily for me nothing put on this drive is critical....it all can be refetched if needed. Anyhow there is my rant for the month. Anyone shed some light on how I might avoid a similar situation in the future? This isn't the first time I was burned this way. If nothing else I would settle for someone giving me a good port program to do surface scans with. To keep me abreast of drives beginning to fail I might like to surface scan entire disks every couple months...especially since many of my drives are over 3 years old and I am typically put them through some brutal workloads occasionally. Jason Cribbins oh and sorry about the hotmail. I hope it formats correctly. I am switching over to a real pop3 mail server soon, which will allow me to use a decent email client eventually. Please reply to or cc me as hotmail fills up way to fast to subscribe this email to the list. _________________________________________________________________ Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 08:21:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADCC616A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:21:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from ness.plymouth.edu (ness.plymouth.edu [158.136.1.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8810343D5E for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:20:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ted@ness.plymouth.edu) Received: from ness.plymouth.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ness.plymouth.edu (8.12.9p2/8.12.4) with ESMTP id i0BGKeCG004428; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:20:40 -0500 (EST) Received: (from ted@localhost) by ness.plymouth.edu (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id i0BGKdTL004427; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:20:40 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from ted) From: Ted Wisniewski Message-Id: <200401111620.i0BGKdTL004427@ness.plymouth.edu> In-Reply-To: <20040111040555.GD3393@dan.emsphone.com> "from Dan Nelson at Jan 10, 2004 10:05:55 pm" To: Dan Nelson Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:20:39 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL88 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2-RELEASE - Show stopper problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:21:58 -0000 Dan, Thanks for your response... As you can see in this output from the ps command you suggested, the processes are dfinitely waiting on the disk. BTW.. The syste in question was a fresh install from yesterday with no users other than myself (I did the cvsup to get it to 5.2-RELEASE). It did hang when I did that with a similar result. One of the "install -s etc.." processes went into the same state. Output from PS: 692 wait ?? Is 0:00.00 /bin/sh -c periodic daily 1694 wait ?? I 0:00.00 /bin/sh - /usr/sbin/periodic daily 1701 wait ?? I 0:00.02 /bin/sh - /usr/sbin/periodic daily 1702 wait ?? I 0:00.00 /bin/sh - /usr/sbin/periodic daily 1703 piperd ?? I 0:00.00 mail -s testhost.plymouth.edu daily run output 1779 wait ?? I 0:00.00 /bin/sh /etc/periodic/daily/450.status-securit 1780 wait ?? I 0:00.00 /bin/sh - /usr/sbin/periodic security 1786 wait ?? I 0:00.00 /bin/sh - /usr/sbin/periodic security 1787 wait ?? I 0:00.00 /bin/sh - /usr/sbin/periodic security 1788 piperd ?? I 0:00.00 mail -s testhost.plymouth.edu security run out 1789 wait ?? I 0:00.00 /bin/sh - /etc/periodic/security/100.chksetuid 1795 wait ?? I 0:00.00 /bin/sh - /etc/periodic/security/100.chksetuid 1796 piperd ?? I 0:00.00 xargs -0 -n 20 ls -liTd 1797 piperd ?? I 0:00.00 sed s/^ *// 1798 piperd ?? I 0:00.00 sort -k 11 1799 wait ?? I 0:00.00 /bin/sh - /etc/periodic/security/100.chksetuid 1802 piperd ?? I 0:00.00 cat 1805 ufs ?? D 0:02.10 find /usr -xdev -type f ( -perm -u+x -or -perm 2779 sbwait ?? Is 0:00.02 sshd: sysop [priv] (sshd) 2782 select ?? S 0:00.01 sshd: sysop@ttyp0 (sshd) 737 getblk p0- D 0:02.14 find /usr -xdev -type f ( -perm -u+x -or -perm 2783 pause p0 Ss 0:00.01 -csh (csh) 2786 - p0 R+ 0:00.00 ps -axO wchan These have been running for about 9 hours now, on a base system with nothing extra installed. Originally, I thought it had something to do with the raid controllers on the various machines I tried, however, I was able to duplicate the condition on an ATA based system (I had to work a lot harder at getting the condition to occur on it). It is almost like the I/O is too fast and something happens.. On my test system the machine will run for days with this happening, however, I have another system that is actually doing a lot of I/O.... eventually it crashes (well locks up completely)... If there is any particular info you might need, I am willing to do what I can. Ted (* In the last episode (Jan 10), Ted Wisniewski said: (* > In 5.2-RC and 5.2-RELEASE there appears to be some issue with (* > filesystem or I/O subsystem under 5.2-X. Now, You can install and do (* > the normal kind of things, however, when you create a lot of I/O on (* > the disk there seems to be a problem actually reading/writing it (* > to/from disk. For example, If I do a "make buildworld"... It (* > appears to go along ok. However, I have had a number of (repeatable) (* > situations where the "make installworld" will go so far then will not (* > be able to complete. In this case, there is an attempt to write data (* > to disk that cannot complete; the process goes into a disk wait state (* > (it cannot be killed, and will stay in this state ... forever). (* > (* > For example the standard daily security script: (* > (* > 727 p0 T 0:00.00 sh 100.chksetuid (* > 737 p0 T 0:02.14 find /usr -xdev -type f ( -perm -u+x -or -perm -g+x -or -perm -o+x ) ( -perm -u+s -or -perm -g+s (* (* The 'T' state usually means that someone sent the process a STOP (* signal. Try running "kill -CONT 727 737" to start them back up. (* (* Processes waiting on disk I/O will be in the 'D' state, and you can run (* "ps axO wchan" to print the specific part of the kernel it's waiting (* in. (* (* -- (* Dan Nelson (* dnelson@allantgroup.com (* -- | Ted Wisniewski E-Mail: ted@mail.plymouth.edu | | Manager, Systems Group WEB: http://oz.plymouth.edu/~ted/ | | Information Technology Services | | Plymouth State University Phone: (603) 535-2661 | | Plymouth NH, 03264 Fax: (603) 535-2263 | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 08:23:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BAC16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:23:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from femail21.im.home.ne.jp (femail21.im.home.ne.jp [203.165.11.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7757243D93 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:23:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wgc@jcom.home.ne.jp) Received: by femail21.im.home.ne.jp with ESMTP <20040111162314.VCFQ1074.femail21.im.home.ne.jp@smtp103.mf.home.ne.jp> for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 01:23:14 +0900 Received: from localhost (61-22-214-125.home.ne.jp [61.22.214.125]) by smtp103.mf.home.ne.jp (s13091800) with SMTP id i0BGNDDQ012244 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 01:23:13 +0900 (JST) To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: Easy DM free Message-ID: <20040111.1623110118@wgc-jcom.home.ne.jp> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 01:23:11 +0900 From: pbm MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP Subject: =?iso-2022-jp?b?GyRCN3I5L0UqJEtIfiQ3JC8kNyQrJGIwQkE0JEskZCQ7JGsbKEI=?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:23:46 -0000 $B"!"!"!5f6K$N%@%$%(%C%H"!"!"!(B $B6l$7$$%@%$%(%C%H$O$$$d!*!*(B $B%j%P%&%s%I$bI]$$!*!*(B $B$3$s$J?M$KO/Js$G$9!#(B $B%@%$%(%C%H$G$NITB-$7$,$A$J1IM\J,$rJd5k$7$J$,$i?)$Y$F$d$;$k!*!*(B $B"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!"!(B $B6=L#$,$"$C$?$i%/%j%C%/!*!*(B http://dbasuta.ath.cx From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 08:30:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF01116A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:30:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from gandelf.techiesalumni.com (mbjornson.dsl.visi.com [209.98.117.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A5243D77 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:30:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matt@techiesalumni.com) Received: from [10.0.0.9] (mac.techiesalumni.com [10.0.0.9]) by gandelf.techiesalumni.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A363ABDD4E; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:12:26 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: <200401110045.42038.kstewart@owt.com> References: <200401110045.42038.kstewart@owt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <63F93F8A-4453-11D8-9B5E-000A959C056E@techiesalumni.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matt Bjornson Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:29:55 -0600 To: Kent Stewart X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.609) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: aic7xxx/FreeBSD/Linux can't find disk drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:30:59 -0000 Kent, Thanks, still nothing... you're right I forgot to change my email to /dev/da for FreeBSD (/dev/sda is Linux scsi drive) Any other ideas? I thought there might be some IRQ conflicts but there isn't when I look in kernel config before install... These aren't RAID so I thought it'd be a no brainer.... Thanks, Matt On Jan 11, 2004, at 2:45 AM, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Saturday 10 January 2004 09:06 pm, Matt Bjornson wrote: >> I have a Dell PowerEdge 2400 with dual 733 Mhx CPUs. I have tried >> to install several distros of Linux (Red Hat 9.0 and Gentoo 1.4) >> and FreeBSD 4.8, 5.0 and while I can get the kernels to recognize >> the Adaptec 7890 and the Adaptec 7880 and use my scsi CDROM, when I >> fdisk to try to create partitions, I receive a unable to find >> /dev/sda Thanks >> > > > All of the scsi disks I ever had were refered to as /dev/da... > > Kent > > -- > Kent Stewart > Richland, WA > > http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 08:36:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632CF16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:36:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE35343D5A for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:36:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i0BGaTfn013062 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:36:30 GMT (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i0BGaTj4013061; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:36:29 GMT (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:36:29 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman To: Malcolm Kay Message-ID: <20040111163629.GA12774@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Malcolm Kay , ecrist@adtechintegrated.com, Bernard El-Hagin , FreeBSD Questions References: <20040110224342.23710.qmail@web13910.mail.yahoo.com> <200401111653.52614.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> <20040111120559.GB10388@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <200401120018.52511.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="17pEHd4RhPHOinZp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401120018.52511.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: ecrist@adtechintegrated.com cc: Bernard El-Hagin cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Download contents of http directory? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:36:40 -0000 --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 12:18:52AM +1030, Malcolm Kay wrote: > On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:35, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 04:53:52PM +1030, Malcolm Kay wrote: > > > This raises a question for which I don't know the answer: > > > How does one list an http directory that does allow it? > > > > Basically, you shouldn't. If the web site administrator has set up > > index.html files or otherwise prevented you from generating a > > directory listing, it generally means that there's stuff in that > > directory which you aren't meant to access. It's impolite (at best) > > to try and get round that, although the wise admin will take stronger > > meansures to ensure that even if you can guess filenames, you still > > can't download anything you shouldn't. > > >=20 > Please reread my query -- I'm asking how to read the directory=20 > when the administrator does allow it. Oops. Sorry about that. Note to self: read what is written, not anything else. Just do a HTTP GET on the directory name. eg. % GET http://localhost/~matthew/ Index of /~matthew

Index of /~matthew

3D"Icon Name                    Last modified      Size  Descript=
ion
3D"[DIR]" Pa=
rent Directory                             -  =20
    3D"[DIR]" book=
s/                  07-Aug-2003 20:12    -  =20
    3D"[DIR]" cryptosphere/           02-Jun-2003 16:34    -  =20
    3D"[ fo=
o.php                 08-Oct-2003 12:24  1.1K =20
    3D"[TXT]" =
mrtg-rrd.cgi            23-Jan-2003 13:30   24K =20
    3D"[TXT]" mrtg-rrd.cgi-1.20       31-Jan-2003 16:25   24K =20
    3D"[TXT]" mrtg-rrd.cgi.000        14-Jan-2003 12:55   24K =20
    3D"[DIR]" mrtg/=
                   18-Apr-2003 15:36    -  =20
    3D"[TXT]" nwc.c=
gi                 17-Nov-2002 08:04   12K =20
    3D"[TXT]" nwc.c=
ss                 17-Nov-2002 08:04  2.0K =20
    3D"[ nw=
c.php                 17-Nov-2002 08:04   12K =20
Apache/2.0.48 (Unix) PHP/4.3.4 Server at localhost Port 80 If you want that without all of the HTML fluff: % lynx -dump -nolist http://localhost/~matthew/ =20 Index of /~matthew =20 Icon Name Last modified Size Description _____________________________________________________________________= _____ [DIR] Parent Directory - [DIR] books/ 07-Aug-2003 20:12 - [DIR] cryptosphere/ 02-Jun-2003 16:34 - [ ] foo.php 08-Oct-2003 12:24 1.1K [TXT] mrtg-rrd.cgi 23-Jan-2003 13:30 24K [TXT] mrtg-rrd.cgi-1.20 31-Jan-2003 16:25 24K [TXT] mrtg-rrd.cgi.000 14-Jan-2003 12:55 24K [DIR] mrtg/ 18-Apr-2003 15:36 - [TXT] nwc.cgi 17-Nov-2002 08:04 12K [TXT] nwc.css 17-Nov-2002 08:04 2.0K [ ] nwc.php 17-Nov-2002 08:04 12K _____________________________________________________________________= _____ =20 =20 Apache/2.0.48 (Unix) PHP/4.3.4 Server at localhost Port 80 Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAAXuNdtESqEQa7a0RAk0NAJ9xiWlIrWJw6UO1iMrd7rjCC2vrQACePi2O aa8zHuTmkk5cWLpxNxdGN5E= =x3Om -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 08:36:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9345216A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:36:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccmmhc02.asp.att.net (sccmmhc02.asp.att.net [204.127.203.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8158143D2F; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:36:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david.fleck@mchsi.com) Received: from grond (12-216-14-105.client.mchsi.com[12.216.14.105]) by sccmmhc02.asp.att.net (sccmmhc02) with SMTP id <20040111163649mm2009s0mde>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:36:49 +0000 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:36:49 -0600 (CST) From: David Fleck Sender: dcf@grond.sourballs.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20040111091753.H57717@grond.sourballs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: where are the jabber man pages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:36:52 -0000 4.9-RELEASE-p1. I've installed jabber (successfully, as far as I can tell) from ports, cvsup'ed Jan. 10. But I can't find any documentation for it on my system, either as man pages, docs in /usr/local/share/doc, info pages... I know I can wade through information on the jabberstudio.org web site, but shouldn't something get installed on the machine? -- David Fleck david.fleck@mchsi.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 08:52:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FE516A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:52:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FAE43D46 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 08:52:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i0BGqdfn013212 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:52:39 GMT (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i0BGqc71013211; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:52:38 GMT (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:52:38 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman To: "mgmcomm @hotmail.com" Message-ID: <20040111165238.GB12774@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , "mgmcomm @hotmail.com" , questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="K8nIJk4ghYZn606h" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail aliases not worked as expected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:52:46 -0000 --K8nIJk4ghYZn606h Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 03:50:03PM +0000, mgmcomm @hotmail.com wrote: > When a cron or periodic task creates an email to say root...it gets maile= d=20 > to root@host.domain.com instead of root@domain.com. Which results in an= =20 > error message That's by design, believe it or not. 'root' is a member of class E -- Exposed Users -- whoese e-mail addresses won't be rewritten by genericstable processing or the like. =20 > Jan 7 03:03:01 butters sm-mta[1511]: i07331me001498: SYSERR(root):=20 > butters.kibserv.org. config error: mail loops back to me (MX problem?) On your mail host, you need to add the names of all of the hosts you provide mail service for to the /etc/mail/local-host-names file, one per line. > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > kibserv.org. 1H IN MX 10 mail.kibserv.org. > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > mail.kibserv.org. 1H IN CNAME stan.kibserv.org. > stan.kibserv.org. 1H IN A 10.0.0.8 Not relevant to your current problem, but you've got your MX pointed to a CNAME. That's bad karma and not permitted by the DNS standards. You should make mail.kibserv.org into an A record like so: mail.kibserv.org. 1H IN A 10.0.0.8 stan.kibserv.org. 1H IN A 10.0.0.8 and similarly, provide PTR records for both names: $ORIGIN 0.0.10.in-addr.arpa. 8 1H IN PTR mail.kibserv.org. PTR stan.kibserv.org. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --K8nIJk4ghYZn606h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAAX9WdtESqEQa7a0RAs5WAJ9G96WmJDdaAgBWoTdzjcw4UnGK9wCfeFSJ EL72c24VxUak+j8/itxWKQ8= =Hgps -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --K8nIJk4ghYZn606h-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 09:17:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89BEA16A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:17:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net (stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBBE43D1F; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:17:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 22-15.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.22.15] helo=yoda.datawok.com) by stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AfjDp-0005uC-00; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:17:57 -0800 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: David Fleck , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:17:56 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20040111091753.H57717@grond.sourballs.org> In-Reply-To: <20040111091753.H57717@grond.sourballs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401111117.56317.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4bd8da9b09f488bd4ccccb2eac0ad0eee6350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Subject: Re: where are the jabber man pages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 17:17:59 -0000 On Sunday 11 January 2004 10:36 am, David Fleck wrote: > 4.9-RELEASE-p1. > > I've installed jabber (successfully, as far as I can tell) from ports, > cvsup'ed Jan. 10. > > But I can't find any documentation for it on my system, either as man > pages, docs in /usr/local/share/doc, info pages... > > I know I can wade through information on the jabberstudio.org web site, > but shouldn't something get installed on the machine? > > -- > David Fleck > david.fleck@mchsi.com A list of files that are installed by a port can be found in the "pkg-plist" file of the ports directory. In the case of jabber, I don't see much in the way of documentation. You should probably check on jabber's website or do a web search. Best of luck, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 09:22:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF8B16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:22:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from catseye.mine.nu (d207-81-17-215.bchsia.telus.net [207.81.17.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7F8743D69 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:22:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from catseye@catseye.mine.nu) Received: (qmail 75734 invoked by uid 1001); 11 Jan 2004 17:27:08 -0000 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:27:08 -0800 From: Chris Pressey To: lance@dallypost.com Message-Id: <20040111092708.4f495070.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: <13982.66.82.160.1.1073838999.squirrel@www.dallypost.com> References: <4554.66.82.160.1.1073789393.squirrel@www.dallypost.com> <200401101949.59899.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> <1024.66.82.166.202.1073794678.squirrel@www.dallypost.com> <200401102255.23969.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> <13982.66.82.160.1.1073838999.squirrel@www.dallypost.com> Organization: Cat's Eye Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 17:22:58 -0000 On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:36:39 -0700 (MST) "Lance Earl" wrote: > The Monitor section of XF86Config includes > Identifier "Monitor0" > VendorName "Monitor Vendor" > Model Name "Monitor Model" > HorizSync 31.0 -70.0 > VertRefresh 55.0 - 120.0 If your aim is simply to get a stable display (at the expense of video quality,) you could try more conservative values for these. I have the following in my XF86Config: HorizSync 31.5 - 35.1 VertRefresh 50.0 - 70.0 This lets me get 16-bit colour at 800x600 resolution, which is all I need. If you want higher resolutions, you can start from there and gradually increase the values until you get a range which is large enough to support more colours and/or pixels, but not so large that it lets your display go all woobly. > My Monitor is a NEC FE700+ so these settings seem to be correct. I see > taht the refresh rates are not in quotes like the other items, is this > correct? Correct, they do not need quotes. > I forgot to mention that during install, after running the xconfig > setup and saving the files, it said that the setup appeared to have > failed and gave me a chance to try again. I tried several times but > with the same result. I get this all the time too. I think it might be a bug in the install process, actually... -Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 09:43:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B979F16A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:43:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout09.sul.t-online.com (mailout09.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18A2243D58; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:43:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from fwd01.aul.t-online.de by mailout09.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 1AfjcB-0000lG-03; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:43:07 +0100 Received: from Andro-Beta.Leidinger.net (b7vwl8ZBweFDaLDOXpSytrugJKvvdJcYYs54YA6DtCal7kFeiA+O8a@[217.83.18.130]) by fmrl01.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 1Afjc0-2JEHPk0; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:42:56 +0100 Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (Magellan.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.1]) i0BHgoJb075264; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:42:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from Magellan.Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0BHh651065257; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:43:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:43:06 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: "Andrew L. Gould" Message-Id: <20040111184306.610cdc29@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <200401111117.56317.algould@datawok.com> References: <20040111091753.H57717@grond.sourballs.org> <200401111117.56317.algould@datawok.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Seen: false X-ID: b7vwl8ZBweFDaLDOXpSytrugJKvvdJcYYs54YA6DtCal7kFeiA+O8a@t-dialin.net cc: David Fleck cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: where are the jabber man pages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 17:43:21 -0000 On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:17:56 -0600 "Andrew L. Gould" wrote: > A list of files that are installed by a port can be found in the "pkg-plist" > file of the ports directory. man-pages aren't listed in the plist in the ports directory (but they are listed in /var/db/pkg//+CONTENTS), they get listed in the Makefile in a MANx variable. Bye, Alexander. -- I will be available to get hired in April 2004. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 09:55:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1157216A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:55:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from razorbill.mail.pas.earthlink.net (razorbill.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37EB43D58; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:55:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 22-15.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.22.15] helo=yoda.datawok.com) by razorbill.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AfjoN-0002JG-00; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 09:55:43 -0800 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: Alexander Leidinger Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:55:41 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20040111091753.H57717@grond.sourballs.org> <200401111117.56317.algould@datawok.com> <20040111184306.610cdc29@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20040111184306.610cdc29@Magellan.Leidinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401111155.41520.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b504ee5dfb42a98f9ad8590ba2bd2081d350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: David Fleck cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: where are the jabber man pages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 17:55:54 -0000 On Sunday 11 January 2004 11:43 am, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:17:56 -0600 > > "Andrew L. Gould" wrote: > > A list of files that are installed by a port can be found in the > > "pkg-plist" file of the ports directory. > > man-pages aren't listed in the plist in the ports directory (but they > are listed in /var/db/pkg//+CONTENTS), they get listed in the > Makefile in a MANx variable. > > Bye, > Alexander. I stand corrected. Thanks, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 10:05:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5212C16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:05:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao07.cox.net (lakemtao07.cox.net [68.1.17.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCAE043D45 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:05:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from micheal@tsgincorporated.com) Received: from dredster ([68.12.79.37]) by lakemtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040111180547.QSSQ2432.lakemtao07.cox.net@dredster>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:05:47 -0500 Message-ID: <2a1501c3d86d$b093ffb0$0201a8c0@dredster> From: "Micheal Patterson" To: "mgmcomm @hotmail.com" , References: Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:06:48 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: sendmail aliases not worked as expected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:05:51 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "mgmcomm @hotmail.com" To: Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 9:50 AM Subject: sendmail aliases not worked as expected > I am having trouble getting /etc/mail/aliases to properly forward system > messages such as cron or periodic events. Actually this problem affects > even mail input using the mail command or any other method. Although the > cron/periodic is what I require the most. > > When a cron or periodic task creates an email to say root...it gets mailed > to root@host.domain.com instead of root@domain.com. Which results in an > error message > > Jan 7 03:03:01 butters sm-mta[1511]: i07331me001498: SYSERR(root): > butters.kibserv.org. config error: mail loops back to me (MX problem?) > > A bounce message is generated and sends cleanly to postmaster@kibserv.org. > The original message is removed from the queue...apparently this error is > fatal to the original message. > > my alias file contains the following > root: root@kibserv.org > seti: root@kibserv.org > kib: mgmcomm@hotmail.com > virtualuser: mgmcomm@hotmail.com > > and many other entries...most are the defaults in the original file enabled > and almost all eventually point to root anyhow. And yes I have run > newaliases and received successful and positive response. > > 10:17am butters:/etc/mail # newaliases > /etc/mail/aliases: 38 aliases, longest 22 bytes, 504 bytes total > > This problem seemed to start about the time I upgrades from 4.7 to 5.2. > Presently I am loosely tracking current...usually up to a month behind with > a 1 week run on a test box. I plan to track 5-stable as soon as I see it > since I am too deep into 5.x features to go back to 4.x now. Current is not > really all I bargained for :) > > 10:25am butters:/etc/mail # uname -a > FreeBSD butters 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #3: Tue Dec 16 19:32:35 UTC > 2003 root@butters:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM i386 > > in my rc.conf file I thought maybe my sendmail options were wrong. > historically I have used: > sendmail_enable="YES" > but after reading the defaults and the rc.sendmail file I find that this > option is exclusive of two other sendmail options > sendmail_submit_enable and sendmail_outbound_enable > > So I tried each in turn with no change in result. But since I can't find > much documentation on these other than what I can make from the rc.sendmail > I might still just be using the wrong rc.conf the wrong way. > > It seems to me that sendmail is completely ignoring the /etc/mail/aliases > file > Even when I try to send mail to kib (a real user) or the virtualuser the > mail always tries to go to user@host.domain.com...which eventually bounces > and gets attached to a message to the postmaster. I suppose the aliases are > not completely ignored because no mail ever gets to the local user mail > accounts. > > Also note that the kibserv.org is an old domain no longer registered...but > we still use it for testing purposes. To prove this is not a dns related > issue here is a few digs. Our local dns server has all the correct records. > > 10:29am butters:/etc/mail # dig kibserv.org mx > If the system is sending mail to itself for processing, as most mx's do, you need to have the full host name in the local-host-names file. Otherwise, it doesn't know it's the controlling mx and will reject the mail. -- Micheal Patterson Network Administration TSG Incorporated 405-917-0600 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 10:09:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F44416A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:09:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns2.alphaque.com (ns2.alphaque.com [202.75.47.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD5A743D66 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:08:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: (qmail 51715 invoked by uid 0); 11 Jan 2004 18:08:51 -0000 Received: from lucifer.net-gw.com (HELO prophet.alphaque.com) (202.75.47.153) by lucifer.net-gw.com with SMTP; 11 Jan 2004 18:08:51 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.alphaque.com [127.0.0.1]) by prophet.alphaque.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0BI8Lac035680 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 02:08:21 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 02:08:21 +0800 (MYT) From: Dinesh Nair To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040112015152.L336-100000@prophet.alphaque.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: routing to specific network X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:09:03 -0000 hey, i'm on a multihomed FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE, cvsupped and built to -STABLE as of two weeks ago. the two NICs on the box each go to different ADSL providers. right now, i can switch which provider i use by just manually changing the default route. however, what i'd like to do is to have the default route set to one provider, but manually add static routes to networks closer to the second provider going out that way. EXAMPLE OUTPUT OF NETSTAT -RN: default 192.168.0.1 UGSc 13 2878 fxp0 10.1/16 link#9 UC 2 0 aue0 10.1.105.5 00:e0:7d:03:a2:08 UHLW 0 363 aue0 815 10.1.105.26 00:08:54:d0:5d:2e UHLW 1 0 lo0 60.6/16 10.1.1.1 UGSc 0 0 aue0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 12407 lo0 192.168.0 link#2 UC 1 0 fxp0 192.168.0.1 00:30:ab:10:6c:0d UHLW 13 215 fxp0 913 (192.168.0.1 is ISP1's router and 10.1.1.1 is ISP2's router) i've successfully managed to add routes for /16 networks, and 'netstat -rn' as well as 'route -n get' both give the expected results. however, tracerouting to an ip address in one of these static routes still shows that it is going out thru the default route instead of the second provider. running a packet sniffer and attempting a http connection confirmed this. in this case, any packet going to 60.6.1.1 what exactly should i be doing to get the behaviour i desire ? a secondary question is, with the /usr/ports/net/zebra package, can i configure this box to load balance flows over both ADSL connections, assuming i do not have an AS number (for BGP) handy ? i.e. the question is, assuming i make a tcp connection out using a browser (for argument's sake, mozilla), can mozilla send the packet out dynamically on the first NIC (with its IP address as source) and then round robin the next TCP connection off the second NIC (with the second IP address as source) ? would i need the recent multipath patches (though its for 4.8-STABLE) to do this ? Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 10:38:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6F216A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:38:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6263943D45 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:38:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i0BIcpi18803; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:38:51 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: Matt Bjornson Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:38:51 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200401110045.42038.kstewart@owt.com> <63F93F8A-4453-11D8-9B5E-000A959C056E@techiesalumni.com> In-Reply-To: <63F93F8A-4453-11D8-9B5E-000A959C056E@techiesalumni.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401111038.51350.kstewart@owt.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: aic7xxx/FreeBSD/Linux can't find disk drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:38:56 -0000 On Sunday 11 January 2004 08:29 am, Matt Bjornson wrote: > Kent, > > Thanks, still nothing... you're right I forgot to change my email > to /dev/da for FreeBSD (/dev/sda is Linux scsi drive) Any other > ideas? I thought there might be some IRQ conflicts but there isn't > when I look in kernel config before install... These aren't RAID > so I thought it'd be a no brainer.... When you are running sysinstall, the fdisk option has always presented me with the device name of the HDs I had connected to the scsi adapter. It would be something like da0, da1, and etc., which you would create the slices and partitions. I can't help beyond that because I don't have any systems with scsi HDs on them. I could build a system with 2 - ata-133 80GB HDs on it for what a good uw scsi adapter and HD would cost. Kent > > Thanks, > > Matt > > On Jan 11, 2004, at 2:45 AM, Kent Stewart wrote: > > On Saturday 10 January 2004 09:06 pm, Matt Bjornson wrote: > >> I have a Dell PowerEdge 2400 with dual 733 Mhx CPUs. I have > >> tried to install several distros of Linux (Red Hat 9.0 and > >> Gentoo 1.4) and FreeBSD 4.8, 5.0 and while I can get the kernels > >> to recognize the Adaptec 7890 and the Adaptec 7880 and use my > >> scsi CDROM, when I fdisk to try to create partitions, I receive > >> a unable to find /dev/sda Thanks > > > > All of the scsi disks I ever had were refered to as /dev/da... > > > > Kent > > > > -- > > Kent Stewart > > Richland, WA > > > > http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 10:40:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C9FC16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:40:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22CE43D2F for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:40:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) id i0BIeWRp077035; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:40:32 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:40:32 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Ted Wisniewski Message-ID: <20040111184032.GE3393@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20040111040555.GD3393@dan.emsphone.com> <200401111620.i0BGKdTL004427@ness.plymouth.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401111620.i0BGKdTL004427@ness.plymouth.edu> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2-RELEASE - Show stopper problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:40:35 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 11), Ted Wisniewski said: > Thanks for your response... As you can see in this output from the > ps command you suggested, the processes are dfinitely waiting on the > disk. BTW.. The syste in question was a fresh install from yesterday > with no users other than myself (I did the cvsup to get it to > 5.2-RELEASE). It did hang when I did that with a similar result. > One of the "install -s etc.." processes went into the same state. > > Output from PS: > > 1805 ufs ?? D 0:02.10 find /usr -xdev -type f ( -perm -u+x -or -perm > 737 getblk p0- D 0:02.14 find /usr -xdev -type f ( -perm -u+x -or -perm > > These have been running for about 9 hours now, on a base system with > nothing extra installed. Originally, I thought it had something to > do with the raid controllers on the various machines I tried, > however, I was able to duplicate the condition on an ATA based system > (I had to work a lot harder at getting the condition to occur on it). > It is almost like the I/O is too fast and something happens.. Are you seeing any errors in dmesg or /var/log/messages? I haven't seen any other reports of I/O hanging, so it might still be something to do with your hardware or kernel config. > On my test system the machine will run for days with this happening, > however, I have another system that is actually doing a lot of > I/O.... eventually it crashes (well locks up completely)... If > there is any particular info you might need, I am willing to do what > I can. If you can drop into ddb when it's locked up, I think there are some commands you can run to print the kernel locks held by all the processes, but I'm not sure what they are or how to interpret the results. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 10:49:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7EB16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:49:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from gandelf.techiesalumni.com (mbjornson.dsl.visi.com [209.98.117.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF82143D46 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 10:49:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from matt@techiesalumni.com) Received: from [10.0.0.9] (mac.techiesalumni.com [10.0.0.9]) by gandelf.techiesalumni.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF51BDD4E; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:30:45 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: <200401111038.51350.kstewart@owt.com> References: <200401110045.42038.kstewart@owt.com> <63F93F8A-4453-11D8-9B5E-000A959C056E@techiesalumni.com> <200401111038.51350.kstewart@owt.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matt Bjornson Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:48:14 -0600 To: Kent Stewart X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.609) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: aic7xxx/FreeBSD/Linux can't find disk drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:49:08 -0000 Kent, Thanks again. I've spent the weekend trying to get this thing going... I know both scsi hosts are supported by FreeBSD and Linux, there aren't any IRQ conflicts between the devices.... I am perplexed. thanks again, Matt On Jan 11, 2004, at 12:38 PM, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Sunday 11 January 2004 08:29 am, Matt Bjornson wrote: >> Kent, >> >> Thanks, still nothing... you're right I forgot to change my email >> to /dev/da for FreeBSD (/dev/sda is Linux scsi drive) Any other >> ideas? I thought there might be some IRQ conflicts but there isn't >> when I look in kernel config before install... These aren't RAID >> so I thought it'd be a no brainer.... > > When you are running sysinstall, the fdisk option has always presented > me with the device name of the HDs I had connected to the scsi > adapter. It would be something like da0, da1, and etc., which you > would create the slices and partitions. > > I can't help beyond that because I don't have any systems with scsi > HDs on them. I could build a system with 2 - ata-133 80GB HDs on it > for what a good uw scsi adapter and HD would cost. > > Kent > > >> >> Thanks, >> >> Matt >> >> On Jan 11, 2004, at 2:45 AM, Kent Stewart wrote: >>> On Saturday 10 January 2004 09:06 pm, Matt Bjornson wrote: >>>> I have a Dell PowerEdge 2400 with dual 733 Mhx CPUs. I have >>>> tried to install several distros of Linux (Red Hat 9.0 and >>>> Gentoo 1.4) and FreeBSD 4.8, 5.0 and while I can get the kernels >>>> to recognize the Adaptec 7890 and the Adaptec 7880 and use my >>>> scsi CDROM, when I fdisk to try to create partitions, I receive >>>> a unable to find /dev/sda Thanks >>> >>> All of the scsi disks I ever had were refered to as /dev/da... >>> >>> Kent >>> >>> -- >>> Kent Stewart >>> Richland, WA >>> >>> http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- > Kent Stewart > Richland, WA > > http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 11:10:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C3C16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:10:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from fep1.cogeco.net (smtp.cogeco.net [216.221.81.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8083443D5A for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:10:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pnmurphy@cogeco.ca) Received: from jupiter.upton.net (d141-18-230.home.cgocable.net [24.141.18.230]) by fep1.cogeco.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 233063D32; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:10:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from earth.upton.net (earth.upton.net [192.168.0.3]) by jupiter.upton.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with SMTP id i0BJATYE068000; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:10:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from paul@earth.upton.net) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:10:22 -0500 From: Paul Murphy To: Alex Message-Id: <20040111141022.6efa98ab@earth.upton.net> In-Reply-To: <20040111013239.88300.qmail@web10409.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20040111013239.88300.qmail@web10409.mail.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) User-Agent: X-Face: -Q/~XHbe$z/a List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:10:37 -0000 --Signature=_Sun__11_Jan_2004_14_10_22_-0500_BbeFer+PbQjhWT7G Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:32:39 -0800 (PST) Alex wrote: > I'm setting up cdbakeoven on FreeBSD 4.8 and I'm > trying to burn a set of MP3 files to an audio CD. > Everything works fine if I only burn a single track, > but when I try to do more than one it appears to trip > over itself when writing to the /tmp directory. Here's > the results of "dump", the error message seems to be > on the last line with "no such file or directory..." > [snip] > Burn failed! > I have been struggling with this same problem. The part that puzzles me is "No read access for '/usr/tmp/cdbo_audio_1_10_17_55_31.wav etc..'" It doesn't seem to be a permissions problem because I too have run as root plus changed permissions on everything to world readable. Eric F Crist wrote: > Do you have cdrecord installed? It seems as if this program depends > on it. If so, make sure it's been installed to the directory that > cdbakeoven expects it in. If not, either create a link, or change the > config for cdbakeoven.io [earth] /home/paul: which cdrecord /usr/local/bin/cdrecord [earth] /home/paul: which cdbakeoven /usr/local/bin/cdbakeoven From cdrecord(1): To record a pure CD-DA (audio) at single speed, with each track contained in a file named track01.cdaudio, track02.cdaudio, etc: cdrecord -v speed=1 dev=2,0 -audio track*.cdaudio I wonder if the way cdbakeoven feeds multiple track names to cdrecord is the problem? (note wild card) Anyway, keep me CC'ed if anyone has any solutions. -- Cogeco ergo sum --Signature=_Sun__11_Jan_2004_14_10_22_-0500_BbeFer+PbQjhWT7G Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAAZ+kTv5Mxsi/WPMRAgn2AJ9CRu4a7GxmCDjTUhvFDwdy5KhPoQCfY6Xz A4W5P1ivRIoC+hv+F3yvfRo= =il+c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Sun__11_Jan_2004_14_10_22_-0500_BbeFer+PbQjhWT7G-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 11:38:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7C216A4D0 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:38:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from search.sparks.net (search.sparks.net [207.5.180.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522BF43D54 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:38:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dmiller@miningworks.com) Received: by search.sparks.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 9C8FCA902; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:38:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by search.sparks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9582FA901; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:38:46 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:38:46 -0500 (EST) From: David Miller X-Sender: dmiller@search.sparks.net To: Dinesh Nair In-Reply-To: <20040112015152.L336-100000@prophet.alphaque.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: dmiller@miningworks.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: routing to specific network X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:38:51 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Dinesh Nair wrote: > > hey, > > i'm on a multihomed FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE, cvsupped and built to -STABLE as > of two weeks ago. the two NICs on the box each go to different ADSL > providers. right now, i can switch which provider i use by just manually > changing the default route. however, what i'd like to do is to have the > default route set to one provider, but manually add static routes to > networks closer to the second provider going out that way. > > EXAMPLE OUTPUT OF NETSTAT -RN: > > default 192.168.0.1 UGSc 13 2878 fxp0 > 10.1/16 link#9 UC 2 0 aue0 > 10.1.105.5 00:e0:7d:03:a2:08 UHLW 0 363 aue0 815 > 10.1.105.26 00:08:54:d0:5d:2e UHLW 1 0 lo0 > 60.6/16 10.1.1.1 UGSc 0 0 aue0 > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 0 12407 lo0 > 192.168.0 link#2 UC 1 0 fxp0 > 192.168.0.1 00:30:ab:10:6c:0d UHLW 13 215 fxp0 913 > > (192.168.0.1 is ISP1's router and 10.1.1.1 is ISP2's router) So you want packets for 60.6.* to go out through ISP2? > > i've successfully managed to add routes for /16 networks, and 'netstat > -rn' as well as 'route -n get' both give the expected results. however, > tracerouting to an ip address in one of these static routes still shows > that it is going out thru the default route instead of the second > provider. running a packet sniffer and attempting a http connection > confirmed this. in this case, any packet going to 60.6.1.1 > > what exactly should i be doing to get the behaviour i desire ? By the sounds of it, exactly what you are doing. Can you show us a traceroute that isn't working normally? Are you running any routing protocols, like routed? > a secondary question is, with the /usr/ports/net/zebra package, can i > configure this box to load balance flows over both ADSL connections, > assuming i do not have an AS number (for BGP) handy ? i.e. the question > is, assuming i make a tcp connection out using a browser (for argument's > sake, mozilla), can mozilla send the packet out dynamically on the first > NIC (with its IP address as source) and then round robin the next TCP > connection off the second NIC (with the second IP address as source) ? > would i need the recent multipath patches (though its for 4.8-STABLE) to > do this ? Zebra implemets a number of routing protocols, including bgp. With BGP you can pick the best route *out* for your packet, but everyone else's BGP sessions will decide the best route *in* for you. In other words, you can't really shape the incoming traffic very much. In order to setup BGP you'll need to get both your upstreams to setup BGP sessions with you, which is very unlikely to happen. It's also unlikely to really buy you any performance advantage after you subtract the bandwidth that the routing protocol takes. Lastly, you don't have any routes to advertise that will help. I assume, at least, that you just have a /32 for each connection, in which case you'd be trying to advertise a /32 to the entire Internet. That's not going to happen:) Hope this helps, --- David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 11:53:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBE216A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:53:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from search.sparks.net (search.sparks.net [207.5.180.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1058143D58 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:53:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dmiller@miningworks.com) Received: by search.sparks.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 778C6A904; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:52:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by search.sparks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756D1A901 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:52:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:52:59 -0500 (EST) From: David Miller X-Sender: dmiller@search.sparks.net To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: dmiller@miningworks.com Subject: Speak Freely X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:53:04 -0000 Hi All; I've spent the last two days trying to get speak freely (Internet voice program with encryption, see I believe I have a full duplex card running properly. I can play a CD and mp3's at the same time, and have both come out the speakers at once. It shows up as: pci1: at 0.0 irq 11 pcm0: port 0xd800-0xd8ff irq 10 at device 5.0 on pci0 ohci0: mem 0xdd000000-0xdd000fff irq 11 at device 13.0 on pci0 Speakfreely was first installed from ports, then compiled in half duplex mode. If I launch sfspeaker -d from one window, and sfmike -d some.host from another, I get the following error from sfspeaker: new:dmiller$ sfspeaker -d sfspeaker: 10.0.0.3 packet lost by half-duplex muting. sfspeaker: 10.0.0.3 packet lost by half-duplex muting. sfspeaker: 10.0.0.3 packet lost by half-duplex muting. It happens while using two terminal sessions after a cold boot; it's not a matter of something else in gnome having a lock on the audio device. I've tried three different sound cards, all of which came up as /dev/pcm0. I'm using 4.9RC and speakfreely 7.6a. One other thing that seems odd is that sound from the mike comes through the speakers even when sfmike is "paused". Suggestions and/or clues most welcome. Thanks, --- David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 12:05:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF7016A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:05:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ness.plymouth.edu (ness.plymouth.edu [158.136.1.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682FF43D31 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:05:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ted@ness.plymouth.edu) Received: from ness.plymouth.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ness.plymouth.edu (8.12.9p2/8.12.4) with ESMTP id i0BK5mCG004870; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:05:49 -0500 (EST) Received: (from ted@localhost) by ness.plymouth.edu (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id i0BK5mbY004869; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:05:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from ted) From: Ted Wisniewski Message-Id: <200401112005.i0BK5mbY004869@ness.plymouth.edu> In-Reply-To: <20040111184032.GE3393@dan.emsphone.com> "from Dan Nelson at Jan 11, 2004 12:40:32 pm" To: Dan Nelson Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:05:48 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL88 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2-RELEASE - Show stopper problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:05:56 -0000 (* In the last episode (Jan 11), Ted Wisniewski said: (* > Thanks for your response... As you can see in this output from the (* > ps command you suggested, the processes are dfinitely waiting on the (* > disk. BTW.. The syste in question was a fresh install from yesterday (* > with no users other than myself (I did the cvsup to get it to (* > 5.2-RELEASE). It did hang when I did that with a similar result. (* > One of the "install -s etc.." processes went into the same state. (* (* Are you seeing any errors in dmesg or /var/log/messages? I haven't (* seen any other reports of I/O hanging, so it might still be something (* to do with your hardware or kernel config. No messages at all in /var/log/messages. I am using the generic kernel in one instance and a custom one in another. For the machine I sent the "ps" info it is a Dell power edge 2650 running a generic kernel. The disk is configuration is a big raid 5 memory is 2G. Since I can duplicate (seemingly at will) on a number of different systems, I doubt it is specific to one machines hardware (3 dell servers of differeing models, 1 dell PC, and 3 noname brand PC's). (* > On my test system the machine will run for days with this happening, (* > however, I have another system that is actually doing a lot of (* > I/O.... eventually it crashes (well locks up completely)... If (* > there is any particular info you might need, I am willing to do what (* > I can. (* (* If you can drop into ddb when it's locked up, I think there are some (* commands you can run to print the kernel locks held by all the (* processes, but I'm not sure what they are or how to interpret the (* results. When it locks up... It is literally frozen... Only a power off will cure. I have occasionally seen a "page not present" panic.. Most of the time the processes just start to pile up accessing the same place(s) on disk. None being able to be killed, and always when I reboot the system after this there is a message about not being able to write buffers... giving up... Ted -- | Ted Wisniewski E-Mail: ted@mail.plymouth.edu | | Manager, Systems Group WEB: http://oz.plymouth.edu/~ted/ | | Information Technology Services | | Plymouth State University Phone: (603) 535-2661 | | Plymouth NH, 03264 Fax: (603) 535-2263 | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 12:24:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA8B16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:24:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.noos.fr (nan-smtp-16.noos.net [212.198.2.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC2E43D60 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:24:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: (qmail 25409 invoked by uid 0); 11 Jan 2004 20:24:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [10.0.1.3]) ([81.64.61.142]) (envelope-sender ) by 212.198.2.124 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Jan 2004 20:24:29 -0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:24:28 +0100 From: Greg Bernard To: 'FreeBSD Questions' Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Other ways than quotas to limit mail files size ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:24:34 -0000 Is there another way to limit the amount of space occupied by mail files on a per user basis using another method than quotas ? I would like to limit the amount of space available for each user's e.mail so e.mail file size will not go crazy. Thanks for your advices... ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF Gr=E9gory Bernard 11, rue de la Tour Directeur 75116 Paris France www.ToDoo.biz tel : +(33) 1 40 26 43 14 ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD "I have always wished that my computer would be as easy to use as my telephone. My wish has come true. I no longer know how to use my telephone." - Bjarne Stroustrup From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 12:30:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2638A16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:30:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A887143D55 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:30:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rob@robc.info) Received: from piethief.demon.co.uk ([80.177.98.130] helo=coconut) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AfmE4-000G6p-0V for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:30:24 +0000 Message-ID: <002301c3d7b8$2f2257c0$0207a8c0@coconut> From: "rob.c" To: References: <000d01c3d435$3bd86b20$0800000a@globalvc.co.uk> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 20:27:35 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Alternatives to zcat ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:30:27 -0000 Hello All, I used to peruse my logs (when prompted by events in the periodic script output emails) using zcat, however i've just tried again for the first time recently and appears the logfile compression format has changed. This is in turn means that i can no longer use a command like "zcat | grep searchstringfromoutputemail" as it just renders a "not in gzip format" message. So my question really is ... is there an alternative to zcat that can read .bz2 compression or do i have to go back to unziping to a directory first and deleting it afterwards ? regards, rob (aka peas) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 12:36:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013AB16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:36:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from madras.dyndns.org (dsl-137.241.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.241.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF1043D31 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:36:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ggop@madras.dyndns.org) Received: from madras.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by madras.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0BKZXL9005693; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:35:33 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from ggop@madras.dyndns.org) Received: (from ggop@localhost) by madras.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9/Submit) id i0BKZXEi005692; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:35:33 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:35:32 +1100 From: Gautam Gopalakrishnan To: "rob.c" Message-ID: <20040111203532.GA5672@madras.dyndns.org> References: <000d01c3d435$3bd86b20$0800000a@globalvc.co.uk> <002301c3d7b8$2f2257c0$0207a8c0@coconut> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <002301c3d7b8$2f2257c0$0207a8c0@coconut> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternatives to zcat ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:36:52 -0000 On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 08:27:35PM -0000, rob.c wrote: > Hello All, > > I used to peruse my logs (when prompted by events in the periodic script > output emails) using zcat, however i've just tried again for the first time > recently and appears the logfile compression format has changed. This is in > turn means that i can no longer use a command like "zcat > | grep searchstringfromoutputemail" as it just > renders a "not in gzip format" message. So my question really is ... is > there an alternative to zcat that can read .bz2 compression or do i have to > go back to unziping to a directory first and deleting it afterwards ? /usr/bin/bzcat From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 12:38:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A3216A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:38:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65DD43D39 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:38:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wegster@mindcore.net) Received: from mindcore.net (rdu162-234-100.nc.rr.com [24.162.234.100]) i0BKcHYr019667; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:38:17 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4001B439.7010307@mindcore.net> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:38:17 -0500 From: Scott W User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20031129 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "rob.c" References: <000d01c3d435$3bd86b20$0800000a@globalvc.co.uk> <002301c3d7b8$2f2257c0$0207a8c0@coconut> In-Reply-To: <002301c3d7b8$2f2257c0$0207a8c0@coconut> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternatives to zcat ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:38:22 -0000 rob.c wrote: >Hello All, > >I used to peruse my logs (when prompted by events in the periodic script >output emails) using zcat, however i've just tried again for the first time >recently and appears the logfile compression format has changed. This is in >turn means that i can no longer use a command like "zcat > | grep searchstringfromoutputemail" as it just >renders a "not in gzip format" message. So my question really is ... is >there an alternative to zcat that can read .bz2 compression or do i have to >go back to unziping to a directory first and deleting it afterwards ? > >regards, >rob >(aka peas) > > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > bzcat would seem to be part of the base system... Scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 12:43:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E102E16A4D0; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:43:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from madras.dyndns.org (dsl-137.241.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.241.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C2D43D2D; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:43:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ggop@madras.dyndns.org) Received: from madras.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by madras.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0BKgUL9005765; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:42:32 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from ggop@madras.dyndns.org) Received: (from ggop@localhost) by madras.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9/Submit) id i0BKgUvt005764; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:42:30 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:42:30 +1100 From: Gautam Gopalakrishnan To: David Fleck Message-ID: <20040111204230.GB5672@madras.dyndns.org> References: <20040111091753.H57717@grond.sourballs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040111091753.H57717@grond.sourballs.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: FreeBSD Questions cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: where are the jabber man pages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:43:50 -0000 On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 10:36:49AM -0600, David Fleck wrote: > 4.9-RELEASE-p1. > > I've installed jabber (successfully, as far as I can tell) from ports, > cvsup'ed Jan. 10. > > But I can't find any documentation for it on my system, either as man > pages, docs in /usr/local/share/doc, info pages... pkg_info -L jabber-1.4.2 | grep /man should work Gautam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 12:54:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C782016A4D2 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:54:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from web10412.mail.yahoo.com (web10412.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.128.126]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03C8643D39 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:54:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from raindogs_1@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040111205440.25409.qmail@web10412.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [198.144.204.135] by web10412.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:54:40 PST Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:54:40 -0800 (PST) From: Alex To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: crist@adtechintegrated.com Subject: Re: cdbakeoven errors when burning multiple tracks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:54:41 -0000 Thanks for the response. Yes, I do have cdrecord installed and everything seems to be in the correct place: u ~$ which cdrecord /usr/local/bin/cdrecord u ~$ which cdbakeoven /usr/local/bin/cdbakeoven If anyone can think of something I can do to correct this problem I would be forever grateful. Thanks, Alex On Saturday 10 January 2004 07:32 pm, Alex wrote: > cdrecord: No such file or directory. No read access Alex, Do you have cdrecord installed? It seems as if this program depends on it. If so, make sure it's been installed to the directory that cdbakeoven expects it in. If not, either create a link, or change the config for cdbakeoven. My .02 -- Eric F Crist AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc (612) 998-3588 __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 13:07:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDC816A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:07:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from madras.dyndns.org (dsl-137.241.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.241.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958F143D49 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:07:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ggop@madras.dyndns.org) Received: from madras.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by madras.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0BL6FL9005897; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:06:15 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from ggop@madras.dyndns.org) Received: (from ggop@localhost) by madras.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9/Submit) id i0BL6FIf005896; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:06:15 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:06:14 +1100 From: Gautam Gopalakrishnan To: Alex Message-ID: <20040111210614.GA5866@madras.dyndns.org> References: <20040111205440.25409.qmail@web10412.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040111205440.25409.qmail@web10412.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cdbakeoven errors when burning multiple tracks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:07:34 -0000 On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 12:54:40PM -0800, Alex wrote: > Thanks for the response. Yes, I do have cdrecord > installed and everything seems to be in the correct > place: > > u ~$ which cdrecord > /usr/local/bin/cdrecord > u ~$ which cdbakeoven > /usr/local/bin/cdbakeoven Hi, Unless you insist on using cdbakeoven, you could just use cdrecord to burn the audio CD: # mpg123 -w 1.wav 1.mp3 # mpg123 -w 2.wav 2.mp3 # mpg123 -w 3.wav 3.mp3 # cdrecord -dao dev=... *.wav # rm *.wav Gautam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 13:33:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A484816A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:33:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [12.15.124.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8866E43D39 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:33:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from evrtwa1-ar12-4-46-162-188.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net (evrtwa1-ar12-4-46-162-188.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net [4.46.162.188]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BCD4A for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:35:27 -0600 (CST) From: Chris To: FreeBSD Questions Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:34:07 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401111534.07979.racerx@makeworld.com> Subject: cvsup from RC to 5.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:33:59 -0000 What would I use in my cvsup file as a rel-tag to nab 5.2-RELEASE -- Best regards, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 13:36:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B616816A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:36:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE76D43D46 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:36:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rob@robc.info) Received: from piethief.demon.co.uk ([80.177.98.130] helo=coconut) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AfnG4-000P4O-0V for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:36:33 +0000 Message-ID: <003801c3d7c1$6d7c52b0$0207a8c0@coconut> From: "rob.c" To: References: <000d01c3d435$3bd86b20$0800000a@globalvc.co.uk> <002301c3d7b8$2f2257c0$0207a8c0@coconut> <20040111203532.GA5672@madras.dyndns.org> Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:33:45 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Resolved (Re: Alternatives to zcat ?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:36:34 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gautam Gopalakrishnan" To: "rob.c" Cc: Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 8:35 PM Subject: Re: Alternatives to zcat ? > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 08:27:35PM -0000, rob.c wrote: > > Hello All, > > > > I used to peruse my logs (when prompted by events in the periodic script > > output emails) using zcat, however i've just tried again for the first time > > recently and appears the logfile compression format has changed. > /usr/bin/bzcat Thanks Gautam and Scott for your suggestion. It worked of course. rob aka peas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 13:48:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED39416A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:48:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C943243D5D for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:48:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i0BLmAfn015890 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:48:10 GMT (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i0BLm95k015889; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:48:09 GMT (envelope-from matthew) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:48:09 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman To: Chris Message-ID: <20040111214809.GA15736@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Chris , FreeBSD Questions References: <200401111534.07979.racerx@makeworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401111534.07979.racerx@makeworld.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: cvsup from RC to 5.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:48:18 -0000 --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 03:34:07PM -0600, Chris wrote: > What would I use in my cvsup file as a rel-tag to nab 5.2-RELEASE Once it has been released you will be able to use RELENG_5_2 It possibly works already, but no guarantees until it's announced. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAAcSZdtESqEQa7a0RAhy7AJ4oEk55FWk6Yx3gYmSo8ieUxLSqnACfWqu8 ge8OFKrOv4CzvjN5UsmOXis= =lrMU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 13:51:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C2F16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:51:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C18043D48 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:51:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i0BLpKi28252; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:51:20 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: Chris , FreeBSD Questions Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:51:20 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200401111534.07979.racerx@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <200401111534.07979.racerx@makeworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401111351.20552.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: cvsup from RC to 5.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:51:30 -0000 On Sunday 11 January 2004 01:34 pm, Chris wrote: > What would I use in my cvsup file as a rel-tag to nab 5.2-RELEASE I was going to send you to the handbook section on CVS tags but there isn't anything for 5.x. You shouldn't install a 5.x-release anyway but follow the security tag, which is RELENG_5_2. Since 5.2 hasn't been released, there isn't an official RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 13:53:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447FA16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:53:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [12.15.124.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5723743D2F for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 13:53:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from evrtwa1-ar12-4-46-162-188.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net (evrtwa1-ar12-4-46-162-188.evrtwa1.dsl-verizon.net [4.46.162.188]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231024A; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:55:09 -0600 (CST) From: Chris To: Kent Stewart , FreeBSD Questions Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:53:50 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200401111534.07979.racerx@makeworld.com> <200401111351.20552.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200401111351.20552.kstewart@owt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401111553.50116.racerx@makeworld.com> Subject: Re: cvsup from RC to 5.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:53:43 -0000 On Sunday 11 January 2004 03:51 pm, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Sunday 11 January 2004 01:34 pm, Chris wrote: > > What would I use in my cvsup file as a rel-tag to nab 5.2-RELEASE > > I was going to send you to the handbook section on CVS tags but there isn't > anything for 5.x. You shouldn't install a 5.x-release anyway but follow the > security tag, which is RELENG_5_2. > > Since 5.2 hasn't been released, there isn't an official > RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE. It may not have been announced, but its on the ftp sitre in both iso and RELEASE format. > > Kent -- Best regards, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 14:00:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C38B316A4D0; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:00:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccmmhc02.asp.att.net (sccmmhc02.asp.att.net [204.127.203.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 987E843D46; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:00:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david.fleck@mchsi.com) Received: from grond (12-216-14-105.client.mchsi.com[12.216.14.105]) by sccmmhc02.asp.att.net (sccmmhc02) with SMTP id <20040111220012mm2009qp3ue>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:00:12 +0000 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:00:12 -0600 (CST) From: David Fleck Sender: dcf@grond.sourballs.org To: Gautam Gopalakrishnan In-Reply-To: <20040111204230.GB5672@madras.dyndns.org> Message-ID: <20040111153903.I25034@grond.sourballs.org> References: <20040111091753.H57717@grond.sourballs.org> <20040111204230.GB5672@madras.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: David Fleck cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: where are the jabber man pages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:00:16 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Gautam Gopalakrishnan wrote: > pkg_info -L jabber-1.4.2 | grep /man > should work thanks... dcf>$ pkg_info -L jabber-1.4.2 Information for jabber-1.4.2: Files: /usr/local/sbin/jabberd /usr/local/etc/jabber.xml.sample /usr/local/etc/rc.d/jabberd.sh /usr/local/include/jabber/lib/lib.h /usr/local/include/jabber/lib/xmlparse.h /usr/local/include/jabber/platform-settings /usr/local/include/jabber/jabberd.h /usr/local/include/jabber/pth.h /usr/local/lib/jabber/dialback/dialback.so /usr/local/lib/jabber/dnsrv/dnsrv.so /usr/local/lib/jabber/jsm/jsm.so /usr/local/lib/jabber/pthsock/pthsock_client.so /usr/local/lib/jabber/xdb_file/xdb_file.so ...that's it. No documentation *at all*. That just doesn't seem right. Heck, I'd be happy to cough up a minimal man page... -- David Fleck david.fleck@mchsi.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 14:01:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6749816A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:01:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510F043D58 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:01:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i0BM1Ki28617; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:01:20 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: Chris , FreeBSD Questions Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:01:20 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200401111534.07979.racerx@makeworld.com> <200401111351.20552.kstewart@owt.com> <200401111553.50116.racerx@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <200401111553.50116.racerx@makeworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401111401.20173.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: cvsup from RC to 5.2-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:01:30 -0000 On Sunday 11 January 2004 01:53 pm, Chris wrote: > On Sunday 11 January 2004 03:51 pm, Kent Stewart wrote: > > On Sunday 11 January 2004 01:34 pm, Chris wrote: > > > What would I use in my cvsup file as a rel-tag to nab 5.2-RELEASE > > > > I was going to send you to the handbook section on CVS tags but there > > isn't anything for 5.x. You shouldn't install a 5.x-release anyway but > > follow the security tag, which is RELENG_5_2. > > > > Since 5.2 hasn't been released, there isn't an official > > RELENG_5_2_0_RELEASE. > > It may not have been announced, but its on the ftp sitre in both iso and > RELEASE format. That may be true; however, they aren't official until the release team sends out an official notice. That hasn't been done yet. Kent > > > Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 14:11:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBD116A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:11:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from out006.verizon.net (out006pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC7743D1D for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:11:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@pcmedx.com) Received: from duron.pcmedx.com ([4.46.22.189]) by out006.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP id <20040111221149.KWRC3734.out006.verizon.net@duron.pcmedx.com>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:11:49 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by duron.pcmedx.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B55DA99D; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:11:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from duron.pcmedx.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (duron.pcmedx.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50675-03; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:11:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mike (mike.pcmedx.com [192.168.240.244]) by duron.pcmedx.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 63D95A928; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:11:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <002401c3d890$044d9770$f4f0a8c0@pcmedx.com> From: "Mike Maltese" To: "'FreeBSD Questions'" References: Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:12:35 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd (http://www.amavis.org) and f-prot (http://www.f-prot.com) at pcmedx.com X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out006.verizon.net from [4.46.22.189] at Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:11:49 -0600 cc: Greg Bernard Subject: Re: Other ways than quotas to limit mail files size ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:11:52 -0000 > Is there another way to limit the amount of space occupied by mail files on > a per user basis using another method than quotas ? > I would like to limit the amount of space available for each user's e.mail > so e.mail file size will not go crazy. Is there an option to limit message size with the MTA you are using? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 14:23:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C482F16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:23:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from holodoc.ip.se (ua-213-115-163-137.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [213.115.163.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89FF043D54 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:23:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rd@tilde.se) Received: by holodoc.ip.se (Postfix, from userid 103) id 6AA2812845A; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:21:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from nyalaptopen (c-f79572d5.02-85-73746f13.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se [213.114.149.247]) by holodoc.ip.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B048128450; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:21:04 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <041301c3d891$8214bac0$7001010a@nyalaptopen> From: "Rickard Dahlstrand" To: "Matthew Seaman" References: <00a301c3d832$16a40c00$7001010a@nyalaptopen> <20040111125114.GC10388@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:23:15 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Sanitizer: This message has been sanitized! Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: automatic dump and restore over X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:23:31 -0000 Thanks for all the good answers. Just one final question. Do you think it is at all possible to do this update without rebooting? It = would save time but I assume that this is impossible. The reason I thinking of doing it this way is because I need to distribute = the update on a bootable cd. I need a method that is as failsafe as it can = be without any user-interaction (Except for turning the power switch). Thanks, Rickard. ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Matthew Seaman" To: "Rickard Dahlstrand" Cc: Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 1:51 PM Subject: Re: automatic dump and restore over On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 12:00:12PM +0100, Rickard Dahlstrand wrote: >=20 > > All the servers is installed with one partition for /, one for /var/. W= hen I do the initial install I move the /etc to /var/etc and synlink /etc t= o point at /var/etc. This should make the / partition exactly the same on a= ll the servers. >=20 > If you move /etc like this, you'll make the machines so treated > unbootable. There's critical stuff in /etc that has to be in the root > partition for the boot process to be able to find it. >=20 > > On the reference server (where I do all the upgrades) I then use dump = to create a file from the / partition. This file is the zipped and moved to= my laptop from installation on all the other servers. > >=20 > > The laptop is then connected to the same network as the server that nee= ds upgrading. The laptop is running DHCP, TFTP and NFS services. > >=20 > > All servers are set to boot using PXE and once I reboot it the server b= oots an image from the laptop containing a picobsd dist with a modified sta= rtup script.=20 > >=20 > > This script automatically mounts the hard drive on the server and a dir= ectory on the laptop containing the dump-file from the reference server. Th= en it uses restore to write the dump-file over the / partition on the serve= r. > >=20 > > After the upgrade is complete I reboot the server without the DHCP serv= er active and the server should boot using the new / partition. > >=20 > > Can this work? I have read that dump/restore is the best solution for b= acking up disks. Could there be any problems using restore on a partition a= lready allocated? >=20 > It strikes me as a lot more complicated than the recommended method, > which is to designate one machine as a 'build box', where you build > all of the OS and kernels you need. You then NFS export /usr/src and > /usr/obj and mount them on the machine you want to update. Then you > can use 'make installkernel', 'make installworld' and 'mergemaster' to > do the update. Possibly with a few other steps here and there -- for > full instructions start with: >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/small-lan.h= tml >=20 > However, if you decide to stick with your first idea, then I'd make > a few changes: >=20 > i) Copy the contents of /etc to your /var as a backup. Leave the > original /etc in place on the root partition. If you're going > to be doing this sort of thing regularly, then you can set up a > cron(8) job: the net/rsync port will let you do the copies very > efficiently. >=20 > ii) Before you rewrite your root partition, you should run newfs(8) > on it to blank it. restore(8) can overwrite a populated > partition, but it works best given an empty filesystem. > =20 > iii) After you've restored your example root partition, copy back > the contents of /etc. Note that this will wipe out any updates > to files within /etc which came as part of the upgrade. > mergemaster(8) will help you fix things up, or you can be > selective about what contents of /etc you actually keep backed > up >=20 > --=20 > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks > Savill Way > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow > Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 14:49:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53CC016A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:49:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from awww.jeah.net (66-192-41-97.gen.twtelecom.net [66.192.41.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B8143D49; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:49:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@JEAH.net) Received: from chris (chris [24.209.188.26]) by awww.jeah.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i0BMnEbT001437; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:49:14 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from chris@JEAH.net) Message-ID: <06d001c3d895$1ede07a0$1abcd118@wi.rr.com> From: "Chris Byrnes" To: , Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:49:07 -0600 Organization: JEAH Communications, LLC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: All mbufs exhausted/Random spontaneous reboots started today X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:49:18 -0000 Sorry for the crosspost, not sure where this should go. Please cc me in replies because I am not subscribed. Server was up almost 134 days and spontaneously rebooted this morning saying "All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7)." Had never seen it before, read up on it and figured something just happened causing a lot of memory usage or something, chalked it up to an abnormality. Took the opportunity to upgrade to the latest -STABLE and rebooted. Server was up for 30 minutes and just rebooted AGAIN with the same message(s).. Jan 11 16:32:19 /kernel: All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7). Jan 11 16:32:50 last message repeated 33 times Jan 11 16:34:44 last message repeated 127 times Do you have any idea what's causing this and how I can monitor/stop it? Thank you.. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 14:57:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A264A16A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:57:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946C443D1D; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:57:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i0BMvoi30717; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:57:50 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: "Chris Byrnes" , , Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:57:50 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <06d001c3d895$1ede07a0$1abcd118@wi.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <06d001c3d895$1ede07a0$1abcd118@wi.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401111457.50578.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: All mbufs exhausted/Random spontaneous reboots started today X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:57:53 -0000 On Sunday 11 January 2004 02:49 pm, Chris Byrnes wrote: > Sorry for the crosspost, not sure where this should go. Please cc me in > replies because I am not subscribed. > > Server was up almost 134 days and spontaneously rebooted this morning > saying "All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7)." Had never seen it > before, read up on it and figured something just happened causing a lot of > memory usage or something, chalked it up to an abnormality. > > Took the opportunity to upgrade to the latest -STABLE and rebooted. > > Server was up for 30 minutes and just rebooted AGAIN with the same > message(s).. > > Jan 11 16:32:19 /kernel: All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7). > Jan 11 16:32:50 last message repeated 33 times > Jan 11 16:34:44 last message repeated 127 times > > Do you have any idea what's causing this and how I can monitor/stop it? > Could you have missed a security update and some one found your hole? Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 14:59:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476CF16A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:59:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from awww.jeah.net (66-192-41-100.gen.twtelecom.net [66.192.41.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AB643D5F; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:59:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chris@JEAH.net) Received: from chris (chris [24.209.188.26]) by awww.jeah.net (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i0BMxWbT005592; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:59:32 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from chris@JEAH.net) Message-ID: <06fd01c3d896$8ebdc000$1abcd118@wi.rr.com> From: "Chris Byrnes" To: "Kent Stewart" , , References: <06d001c3d895$1ede07a0$1abcd118@wi.rr.com> <200401111457.50578.kstewart@owt.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 16:59:24 -0600 Organization: JEAH Communications, LLC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: All mbufs exhausted/Random spontaneous reboots started today X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 22:59:44 -0000 I don't think I did, but if that were the case, wouldn't it have been patched with the upgrade to -STABLE? Chris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kent Stewart" To: "Chris Byrnes" ; ; Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 4:57 PM Subject: Re: All mbufs exhausted/Random spontaneous reboots started today > On Sunday 11 January 2004 02:49 pm, Chris Byrnes wrote: > > Sorry for the crosspost, not sure where this should go. Please cc me in > > replies because I am not subscribed. > > > > Server was up almost 134 days and spontaneously rebooted this morning > > saying "All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7)." Had never seen it > > before, read up on it and figured something just happened causing a lot of > > memory usage or something, chalked it up to an abnormality. > > > > Took the opportunity to upgrade to the latest -STABLE and rebooted. > > > > Server was up for 30 minutes and just rebooted AGAIN with the same > > message(s).. > > > > Jan 11 16:32:19 /kernel: All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7). > > Jan 11 16:32:50 last message repeated 33 times > > Jan 11 16:34:44 last message repeated 127 times > > > > Do you have any idea what's causing this and how I can monitor/stop it? > > > > Could you have missed a security update and some one found your hole? > > Kent > > -- > Kent Stewart > Richland, WA > > http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 15:00:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C3816A56C for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:00:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B1043D6A for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:00:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AfoZC-0003Mg-00 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:00:22 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AfQeE-0008MF-00 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 22:27:58 +0100 Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AfQeE-0002A3-00 for ; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 22:27:58 +0100 From: "Jared Cheney" Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:28:13 -0700 Lines: 27 Message-ID: X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Sender: news Subject: Trouble getting network card to work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:00:35 -0000 Hello, I've just installed FreeBSD 4.9 and am having trouble getting my network card to work. It is very odd, because it appears as though the kernel recognizes the card just fine and is using the pcn module to bring it up, etc. It is an AMD 79c79x card (according to FreeBSD). I can view/set properties via ifconfig - and it properly shows whether or not there is link. I cannot obtain a DHCP lease, nor can I ping any other hosts on my network when I have a static IP configured. To ensure that the NIC is fine and all cables, etc. - I booted from a bootable Linux CD (Knoppix), where I was able to use the card fine to ping, browse the Internet, etc. Linux showed it as an AMD 79c970 [PCNET32 LANCE] card. The card is called pcn0 in FreeBSD, and it says that it is sharing IRQ 10. Running tcpdump for any length of time also shows that 0 packets were received by the filter. Anyone have any ideas as to what could be the problem? Thanks, in advance, Jared From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 15:03:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701F616A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:03:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22AD443D5E; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:03:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i0BN3Ki30941; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:03:20 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: "Chris Byrnes" , , Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:03:20 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <06d001c3d895$1ede07a0$1abcd118@wi.rr.com> <200401111457.50578.kstewart@owt.com> <06fd01c3d896$8ebdc000$1abcd118@wi.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <06fd01c3d896$8ebdc000$1abcd118@wi.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401111503.20501.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: All mbufs exhausted/Random spontaneous reboots started today X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:03:27 -0000 On Sunday 11 January 2004 02:59 pm, Chris Byrnes wrote: > I don't think I did, but if that were the case, wouldn't it have been > patched with the upgrade to -STABLE? Yes, wirh a recent stable. It could be other things such as Apache. Kent > > > Chris > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Kent Stewart" > To: "Chris Byrnes" ; ; > > Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 4:57 PM > Subject: Re: All mbufs exhausted/Random spontaneous reboots started today > > > On Sunday 11 January 2004 02:49 pm, Chris Byrnes wrote: > > > Sorry for the crosspost, not sure where this should go. Please cc me > > > in replies because I am not subscribed. > > > > > > Server was up almost 134 days and spontaneously rebooted this morning > > > saying "All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7)." Had never seen it > > > before, read up on it and figured something just happened causing a lot > > of > > > > memory usage or something, chalked it up to an abnormality. > > > > > > Took the opportunity to upgrade to the latest -STABLE and rebooted. > > > > > > Server was up for 30 minutes and just rebooted AGAIN with the same > > > message(s).. > > > > > > Jan 11 16:32:19 /kernel: All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7). > > > Jan 11 16:32:50 last message repeated 33 times > > > Jan 11 16:34:44 last message repeated 127 times > > > > > > Do you have any idea what's causing this and how I can monitor/stop it? > > > > Could you have missed a security update and some one found your hole? > > > > Kent > > > > -- > > Kent Stewart > > Richland, WA > > > > http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 15:15:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA19D16A4D0 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:15:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from server4.yawl.com.br (server4.yawl.com.br [200.193.239.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7A63E43D5D for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 15:15:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from einstein@yawl.com.br) Received: (qmail 35042 invoked by uid 1009); 11 Jan 2004 23:15:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (200.193.239.25) by server4.yawl.com.br with SMTP; 11 Jan 2004 21:15:10 -0000 Message-ID: <4001D903.2030209@yawl.com.br> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:15:15 -0200 From: Einstein Oliveira User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Byrnes References: <06d001c3d895$1ede07a0$1abcd118@wi.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <06d001c3d895$1ede07a0$1abcd118@wi.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: All mbufs exhausted/Random spontaneous reboots started today X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:15:16 -0000 Chris Byrnes wrote: > Sorry for the crosspost, not sure where this should go. Please cc me in > replies because I am not subscribed. > > Server was up almost 134 days and spontaneously rebooted this morning saying > "All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7)." Had never seen it before, read > up on it and figured something just happened causing a lot of memory usage > or something, chalked it up to an abnormality. > > Took the opportunity to upgrade to the latest -STABLE and rebooted. > > Server was up for 30 minutes and just rebooted AGAIN with the same > message(s).. > > Jan 11 16:32:19 /kernel: All mbufs exhausted, please see tuning(7). > Jan 11 16:32:50 last message repeated 33 times > Jan 11 16:34:44 last message repeated 127 times > > Do you have any idea what's causing this and how I can monitor/stop it? > Use netstat -m to chek the current configuration/load. It's something like this: ---- 191/8272/65536 mbufs in use (current/peak/max): 186 mbufs allocated to data 5 mbufs allocated to packet headers 170/8128/16384 mbuf clusters in use (current/peak/max) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 18324 Kbytes allocated to network (37% of mb_map in use) 0 requests for memory denied 0 requests for memory delayed 0 calls to protocol drain routines ---- You can modify the number of mbufs with sysctl variable kern.ipc.nmbclusters. Usually setting this on /boot/loader.conf ex.: kern.ipc.nmbclusters=16384 Check also tuning(7) ;) > Thank you.. > > > Chris > -- Einstein Oliveira einstein@yawl.com.br ______________________________________________________ Yawl Internet Ltda. http://www.yawl.com.br/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 18:43:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D79C416A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:43:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccimhc02.asp.att.net (sccimhc02.asp.att.net [63.240.76.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3669743D46 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:43:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david.fleck@mchsi.com) Received: from grond (12-216-14-105.client.mchsi.com[12.216.14.105]) by sccimhc02.asp.att.net (sccimhc02) with SMTP id <20040112024309im2006915ne>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 02:43:09 +0000 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:43:09 -0600 (CST) From: David Fleck Sender: dcf@grond.sourballs.org To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20040111202325.W424@grond.sourballs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: agp error with Radeon 7500 disables DRI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 02:43:12 -0000 4.9-RELEASE-p1. At boot, the agp module appears to load OK: # dmesg | grep agp Preloaded elf module "agp.ko" at 0xc03d336c. agp0: mem 0xe0000000-0xe7ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 agp0: allocating GATT for aperture of size 256M However, when starting X, the kernel spits out this message: /kernel: error: [drm:radeon_unlock] *ERROR* Process 265 using kernel context 0 There is no such process when I look, of course... the relevant section of the XFree86 log is: (II) RADEON(0): [drm] created "radeon" driver at busid "PCI:1:0:0" (II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xc22ce000 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] mapped SAREA 0xc22ce000 to 0x28279000 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] framebuffer handle = 0xd8000000 (II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 1 reserved context for kernel (WW) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP not available (II) RADEON(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel (II) RADEON(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0xc22ce000 at 0x28279000 (II) RADEON(0): Memory manager initialized to (0,0) (1024,8191) I'm assuming there's some relationship between (a) the kernel warning message, (b) the 'AGP not available' message, and (c) the fact that DRI doesn't work anymore (it did before I upgraded from 4.6.2 to 4.9). Can anyone think of where to look to figure this out? I've put the XFree86.0.log file at http://www.aracnet.com/~dcf/XFree86.0.log, and the X config file at http://www.aracnet.com/~dcf/XF86Config in case they prove helpful. thanks- -- David Fleck david.fleck@mchsi.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 18:50:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8806416A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:50:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-119-53-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B266C43D31; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:50:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2C9AE66C4F; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:50:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 18:50:09 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: David Fleck Message-ID: <20040112025009.GA7780@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040111091753.H57717@grond.sourballs.org> <20040111204230.GB5672@madras.dyndns.org> <20040111153903.I25034@grond.sourballs.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040111153903.I25034@grond.sourballs.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Gautam Gopalakrishnan cc: FreeBSD Questions cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: where are the jabber man pages? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 02:50:19 -0000 --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 04:00:12PM -0600, David Fleck wrote: > ...that's it. No documentation *at all*. That just doesn't seem right. > Heck, I'd be happy to cough up a minimal man page... Please coordinate your efforts with the jabber developers. Thanks, Kris --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAAgtgWry0BWjoQKURAsQ7AKDJiw0CTuRnQY2BU0H5w5s+23lxbwCg29bg F7UJ2AqSkXvd5gDPHRWBEdE= =As8b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 19:40:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8250816A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:40:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from web21510.mail.yahoo.com (web21510.mail.yahoo.com [66.163.169.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6EFC43D49 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:40:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from non_secure@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040112034023.51078.qmail@web21510.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.9.128.52] by web21510.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:40:23 PST Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 19:40:23 -0800 (PST) From: Joe Schmoe To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Best practices - USB 2.0 PCI card and gigabit ethernet PCI card for FreeBSD 4.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 03:40:24 -0000 I am running freebsd 4.9 and want to add: - a USB 2.0 PCI card and - a gigabit ethernet (copper - cat-5 wiring) PCI card What is the best and best supported choices for each of these ? I am happy to blindly follow whatever suggestion for the USB 2.0 card, however for the gigabit card I have had great luck on the 100meg side of thigns with the Intel etherexpress pro (fxp) cards, so if there is a well supported Intel card, that would be best, I guess. But then again, if there is a non intel gigabit card that is the clear leader in freebsd support, I would like to know it thanks __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 20:21:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A28916A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:21:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E8943D1F; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:21:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kblists@comcast.net) Received: from [192.168.50.54] (h00045a2a945a.ne.client2.attbi.com[66.31.245.154]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <20040112042137012006hdbie>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:21:37 +0000 From: Kevin Berrien To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1523970523.1062.6.camel@linuxppc> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-1b) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Install bug - 4.9 stable - post install circular reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: kblists@comcast.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:21:40 -0000 X-Original-Date: 17 Apr 2018 09:10:14 -0400 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:21:40 -0000 I can confirm an issue posted Dec 3rd, freebsd-stable maillist, titled "4.9 install buglet". I experience this bug running the install (various configurations) 100% of the time. After install, after system reboot, the boot loader comes up with F1: FreeBSD, and reboots continually forever. To test, I made 3 installs without issue using 4.8. So first, I'd like to confirm the bug report, and ask the following. In his "buglet" post, Ian noted the following work around. > Work around. Force write in label screen (or rewrite MBR > and label post reboot) Looking at fdisk, and the label utility I see nothing option along these lines. Could someone explain to me what/how to do this? Has anyone else seen this apparently prevalent issue? Is a fix likely, or do these kind of things just slip by? I did not expect this from a 'stable' release. Unfortunately, I'm making my second attempt at evaluating FreeBSD (last time I used an active box - and got frustrated with bad ports, MySQL/BSD issues, and needed to get the box online, so I installed something that worked). I'm interested in BSD's lean-ness, and other aspects, as opposed to other "nix'es". Needless to say, testing again using 4.9 this time hasn't been very impressive. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 20:24:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904B916A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:24:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta6.adelphia.net (mta6.adelphia.net [68.168.78.190]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5888043D31 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:24:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.103]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20040112041037.BUOB18777.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:10:37 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Jared Cheney" , Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:10:37 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Trouble getting network card to work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:24:15 -0000 I just went through that on my pre Y2K PC using 4.9. Different PCI Nic card, but same symptoms. Had to enable verbose boot messages. Saw that every time I rebooted system the boot log showed an msg saying something about unrecognized ID. I know the card was good so I just kept moving the Nic card to different PCI slot, rebooting, until it finally worked. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jared Cheney Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 4:28 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Trouble getting network card to work Hello, I've just installed FreeBSD 4.9 and am having trouble getting my network card to work. It is very odd, because it appears as though the kernel recognizes the card just fine and is using the pcn module to bring it up, etc. It is an AMD 79c79x card (according to FreeBSD). I can view/set properties via ifconfig - and it properly shows whether or not there is link. I cannot obtain a DHCP lease, nor can I ping any other hosts on my network when I have a static IP configured. To ensure that the NIC is fine and all cables, etc. - I booted from a bootable Linux CD (Knoppix), where I was able to use the card fine to ping, browse the Internet, etc. Linux showed it as an AMD 79c970 [PCNET32 LANCE] card. The card is called pcn0 in FreeBSD, and it says that it is sharing IRQ 10. Running tcpdump for any length of time also shows that 0 packets were received by the filter. Anyone have any ideas as to what could be the problem? Thanks, in advance, Jared _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 20:32:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 403C616A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:32:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from pony.tscp.ru (pony.tscp.ru [195.64.201.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435C443D1D for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:32:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kurilov@tscp.ru) Received: from [192.168.100.150] ([192.168.100.150]) by pony.tscp.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0C4WLWc034798 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:32:22 +0500 (YEKT) (envelope-from kurilov@tscp.ru) From: "Kurilov D.I." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Message-Id: <1073882011.16761.3470.camel@dmk.priv.tscp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1- (1.2.1-alt3) Date: 12 Jan 2004 09:33:32 +0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: vlan support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: kurilov@tscp.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:32:21 -0000 How do you do! I've got FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE from ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org I have a small net with switch Cisco Catalyst 2950 and Cisco Router 2650. The purpose is to replace 2650 router. I've include vlan support in kernel. Correspondingly, my /etc/rc.conf : ifconfig_rl0="inet 192.168.10.1 netmask 255.255.255.252" cloned_interfaces="vlan0 vlan1 vlan2" ifconfig_vlan0="inet xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx netmask 255.255.255.240 vlan 2 vlandev rl0" ifconfig_vlan0_alias0="inet yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy netmask 255.255.255.248" ifconfig_vlan0_alias1="inet zzz.zzz.zzz.zzz netmask 255.255.255.192" ifconfig_vlan1="inet 192.168.253.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 vlan 3 vlandev rl0" ifconfig_vlan2="inet 192.168.100.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 4 vlandev rl0" Catalyst settings were write because it works with cisco router. When I'd reboot my FreeBSD machine I saw that my FreeBSD router didn't forward packets between interfaces. # tail -f /var/log/messages Jan 12 06:41:16 router kernel: vlan1: discard oversize frame (ether type 800 flags 3 len 1514 > max 1510) I have change my mty to 1514 but it didn't help. How can I repair that? With respect, Dmitriy Kurilov. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 20:33:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF12C16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:33:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (law11-oe62.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.16.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F4C43D1D for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:33:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mohanlaljangir@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:33:04 -0800 Received: from 203.200.20.226 by law11-oe62.law11.hotmail.com with DAV; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:33:04 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [203.200.20.226] X-Originating-Email: [mohanlaljangir@hotmail.com] X-Sender: mohanlaljangir@hotmail.com From: "mohanlal jangir" To: Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:00:39 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4927.1200 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jan 2004 04:33:04.0672 (UTC) FILETIME=[2B83CA00:01C3D8C5] Subject: FreeBSD 4.4 not available !! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:33:05 -0000 I want to download FreeBSD version 4.4 but this seems to be not available at links specified at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mirrors-ftp.html Could you tell me where can I download it. Is it available in CVS? Regards Mohanlal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 20:41:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9739E16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:41:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B2743D1F for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:41:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i0C4fMi11278; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:41:22 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: "mohanlal jangir" , Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 20:41:21 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401112041.21974.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 4.4 not available !! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:41:24 -0000 On Sunday 11 January 2004 08:30 pm, mohanlal jangir wrote: > I want to download FreeBSD version 4.4 but this seems to be not available > at links specified at > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/mirrors-ftp.html > > Could you tell me where can I download it. Is it available in CVS? > It is really old but there are a couple of mirrors that still have it on their systems. Look at http://www.freebsdmirrors.org/FBSDsites.php3?showi386ISO=do Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 21:01:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9CE16A4CE; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:01:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from freeman.4gh.net (washdc3-ar5-4-64-188-085.washdc3.elnk.dsl.genuity.net [4.64.188.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66C543D46; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:01:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stuartb@4gh.net) Received: from localhost (stuartb@localhost) by freeman.4gh.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i0C51J5U048994; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:01:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from stuartb@4gh.net) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:01:19 -0500 (EST) From: Stuart Barkley To: Kevin Berrien In-Reply-To: <1523970523.1062.6.camel@linuxppc> Message-ID: <20040111234757.X48488@freeman.4gh.net> References: <1523970523.1062.6.camel@linuxppc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Install bug - 4.9 stable - post install circular reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:01:23 -0000 On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 at 09:10 -0400, Kevin Berrien wrote: Check your system clock. Its way off. > I can confirm an issue posted Dec 3rd, freebsd-stable maillist, > titled "4.9 install buglet". > > I experience this bug running the install (various configurations) > 100% of the time. After install, after system reboot, the boot > loader comes up with F1: FreeBSD, and reboots continually forever. > To test, I made 3 installs without issue using 4.8. So first, I'd > like to confirm the bug report, and ask the following. I have also seen this problem on two of my systems when installing 4.9-RELEASE. > In his "buglet" post, Ian noted the following work around. > > > Work around. Force write in label screen (or rewrite MBR and > > label post reboot) Yes, I found this workaround also and it works for me. > Looking at fdisk, and the label utility I see nothing option along > these lines. Could someone explain to me what/how to do this? (From memory, YMMV) Reboot for the installation CD into sysinstall. Select "Configure" then "Fdisk". In fdisk select "W" this will cause the MBR to be rewritten correctly (I always select the FreeBSD boot manager, I don't know if that is necessary). > Has anyone else seen this apparently prevalent issue? Is a fix > likely, or do these kind of things just slip by? I did not expect > this from a 'stable' release. I'm not running stable so don't know if the problem is fixed there, or even if a fix in known. I'm using an ASUS P4B533-E motherboard with the original BIOS (Rev 1008 08/06/02). There is an updated BIOS available and I hope to be able to give it a try soon (it also fixes another minor problem I've seen: booting from floppy which doesn't work currently). Stuart -- I've never been lost; I was once bewildered for three days, but never lost! -- Daniel Boone From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 21:13:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F90C16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:13:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205C443D1F for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:13:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Received: from [10.0.2.2] (adsl-63-202-92-157.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.92.157]) (authenticated bits=0) by above.proper.com (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0C5DBic087820 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:13:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: phoffprop@mail.proper.com Message-Id: X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:13:14 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Paul Hoffman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Subject: How do I add a third ATA controller to 4.8? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:13:17 -0000 Greetings again. I have a Dell 600SC that has three ATA controllers on the motherboard, and I'm running 4.8 quite happily on it. The GENERIC kernel has the following: device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 device ata1 at isa? port IO_WD2 irq 15 Since I didn't know the irq used by the third controller (it's not listed in their documentation, of course!), I blithely tried adding: device ata2 at isa? port IO_WD3 However, when rebuilding this kernel, I get the following error: cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. -I../../../include -I../../contrib/ipfilter -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 ioconf.c ioconf.c:48: `IO_WD3' undeclared here (not in a function) ioconf.c:48: initializer element is not constant ioconf.c:48: (near initialization for `ata2_resources[1].u.longval') *** Error code 1 So, what am I supposed to add to the kernel to add this third controller? --Paul Hoffman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 21:22:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90B916A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:22:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB78F43D1D for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:22:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (root@tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.12.9/8.11.4) with ESMTP id i0C5O3GH051842; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:24:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by thought.org (8.12.6/8.11.3) id i0C5MCe9076250; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:22:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:22:12 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: Matthew Seaman , Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20040112052212.GA70559@tao.thought.org> References: <20040110221036.GA44130@tao.thought.org> <20040110223308.GA4881@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040110223907.GA16659@Uruk-Hai.Sanitarium.mine.nu> <20040110230218.GA5347@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040111013434.GC44177@tao.thought.org> <20040111115237.GA10388@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040111115237.GA10388@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 17 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: Re: perl script question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:22:18 -0000 On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 11:52:37AM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 05:34:34PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 11:02:18PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > > perl -pi.bak -e 's/\s*\w+_\w+\.?//g;' filename > > > The lines do indeed wrap so this does the job on a test file. > > I do have the re-exp book but this one is far ovr my head. > > What do the "\s*" mean, and also thr "\.?/" ? > Thanks for your tutorial. Time to re-read Jeff Friedl's book. I'd forgotten some of perl's regex rules--specifically, 's' and 'w'; was headsratching what symbolized whitespace. Also did not realize the "\w+_" would match one-or-more underscores. To me, this is the genius of the expression. I have a 994 perl script called reflow that does an outstanding job of formatting std ASCII|8859-N text. I filter any essay thru a program, joinlines, and reflow before handing it off to OpenOffice. What reflow doesn't do is to put two spaces between sentences. That's on my to-hack list:) have a good one, gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 21:31:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2F616A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:31:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp013.mail.yahoo.com (smtp013.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.173.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E352843D31 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:31:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from q_dolan@yahoo.com.au) Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.22.1.10?) (q?dolan@203.10.89.16 with plain) by smtp013.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2004 05:31:31 -0000 From: Q To: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1073885478.32551.17.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:31:19 +1000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Speak Freely X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:31:33 -0000 On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 05:52, David Miller wrote: > Hi All; > > I've spent the last two days trying to get speak freely (Internet voice > program with encryption, see If you are intending to use this out of more than just curiosity you might want to look at alternatives like some of the OpenH323 clients (eg. net/gnomemeeting), as this particular program will be officially 'End of Life'ed by its author on the 15th of this month. > I believe I have a full duplex card running properly. I can play a CD and > mp3's at the same time, and have both come out the speakers at once. It > shows up as: Full Duplex doesn't mean that you can play two things at once.. it means that your sound card (and it's drivers) are able to record and playback at the same time. > Speakfreely was first installed from ports, then compiled in half duplex > mode. If I launch sfspeaker -d from one window, and sfmike -d some.host > from another, I get the following error from sfspeaker: > > new:dmiller$ sfspeaker -d > sfspeaker: 10.0.0.3 packet lost by half-duplex muting. > sfspeaker: 10.0.0.3 packet lost by half-duplex muting. > sfspeaker: 10.0.0.3 packet lost by half-duplex muting. This is exactly what's supposed to happen when you compile it with half duplex mode enabled. You should recompile it without defining HALF_DUPLEX (which should be the default) if you want this behaviour to stop. > One other thing that seems odd is that sound from the mike comes through > the speakers even when sfmike is "paused". If this is sound from your locally connected mic, then this is probably a mixer 'input source' issue more than anything else. Try playing with the 'rec' and 'mic' input level and see if it makes any difference. Seeya...Q From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 21:42:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE57F16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:42:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (sea2-f29.sea2.hotmail.com [207.68.165.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297FD43D3F for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:42:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mgmcomm@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:41:58 -0800 Received: from 68.72.154.25 by sea2fd.sea2.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:41:58 GMT X-Originating-IP: [68.72.154.25] X-Originating-Email: [mgmcomm@hotmail.com] X-Sender: mgmcomm@hotmail.com From: "mgmcomm @hotmail.com" To: micheal@tsgincorporated.com, questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:41:58 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jan 2004 05:41:58.0913 (UTC) FILETIME=[CBB6E710:01C3D8CE] Subject: Re: sendmail aliases not worked as expected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:42:03 -0000 >From: "Micheal Patterson" >To: "mgmcomm @hotmail.com" , >Subject: Re: sendmail aliases not worked as expected >Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 12:06:48 -0600 > > > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "mgmcomm @hotmail.com" >To: >Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 9:50 AM >Subject: sendmail aliases not worked as expected > > > > I am having trouble getting /etc/mail/aliases to properly forward system > > messages such as cron or periodic events. Actually this problem affects > > even mail input using the mail command or any other method. Although >the > > cron/periodic is what I require the most. > > > > When a cron or periodic task creates an email to say root...it gets >mailed > > to root@host.domain.com instead of root@domain.com. Which results in an > > error message > > > > Jan 7 03:03:01 butters sm-mta[1511]: i07331me001498: SYSERR(root): > > butters.kibserv.org. config error: mail loops back to me (MX problem?) > > > > A bounce message is generated and sends cleanly to >postmaster@kibserv.org. > > The original message is removed from the queue...apparently this error >is > > fatal to the original message. > > > > my alias file contains the following > > root: root@kibserv.org > > seti: root@kibserv.org > > kib: mgmcomm@hotmail.com > > virtualuser: mgmcomm@hotmail.com > > > > and many other entries...most are the defaults in the original file >enabled > > and almost all eventually point to root anyhow. And yes I have run > > newaliases and received successful and positive response. > > > > 10:17am butters:/etc/mail # newaliases > > /etc/mail/aliases: 38 aliases, longest 22 bytes, 504 bytes total > > > > This problem seemed to start about the time I upgrades from 4.7 to 5.2. > > Presently I am loosely tracking current...usually up to a month behind >with > > a 1 week run on a test box. I plan to track 5-stable as soon as I see >it > > since I am too deep into 5.x features to go back to 4.x now. Current is >not > > really all I bargained for :) > > > > 10:25am butters:/etc/mail # uname -a > > FreeBSD butters 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #3: Tue Dec 16 19:32:35 >UTC > > 2003 root@butters:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM i386 > > > > in my rc.conf file I thought maybe my sendmail options were wrong. > > historically I have used: > > sendmail_enable="YES" > > but after reading the defaults and the rc.sendmail file I find that this > > option is exclusive of two other sendmail options > > sendmail_submit_enable and sendmail_outbound_enable > > > > So I tried each in turn with no change in result. But since I can't >find > > much documentation on these other than what I can make from the >rc.sendmail > > I might still just be using the wrong rc.conf the wrong way. > > > > It seems to me that sendmail is completely ignoring the >/etc/mail/aliases > > file > > Even when I try to send mail to kib (a real user) or the virtualuser the > > mail always tries to go to user@host.domain.com...which eventually >bounces > > and gets attached to a message to the postmaster. I suppose the aliases >are > > not completely ignored because no mail ever gets to the local user mail > > accounts. > > > > Also note that the kibserv.org is an old domain no longer >registered...but > > we still use it for testing purposes. To prove this is not a dns >related > > issue here is a few digs. Our local dns server has all the correct >records. > > > > 10:29am butters:/etc/mail # dig kibserv.org mx > > > > >If the system is sending mail to itself for processing, as most mx's do, >you >need to have the full host name in the local-host-names file. Otherwise, it >doesn't know it's the controlling mx and will reject the mail. > >-- > Actually the only one doing the job properly is the mail host itself which is using qmail/vpopmail. All local root messages get translated properly...sent to local ip address as per the mx record and then available for picking up via pop3/webmail. I am half tempted to drop sendmail on all hosts and see if qmail will forward to the mail host properly. From what I can tell no mail for root or any other local user ever leave that localhost....but the bounce mesages to the postmaster seem to work just fine. Only the mail host shoud accept incoming mail. mail on each individual host is not checked and needs to all go to one pop3 account on the mail host. Thanks Jason Cribbins _________________________________________________________________ The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 21:43:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365A816A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:43:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (sea2-f46.sea2.hotmail.com [207.68.165.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F101A43D2D for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:42:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mgmcomm@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:42:51 -0800 Received: from 68.72.154.25 by sea2fd.sea2.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:42:51 GMT X-Originating-IP: [68.72.154.25] X-Originating-Email: [mgmcomm@hotmail.com] X-Sender: mgmcomm@hotmail.com From: "mgmcomm @hotmail.com" To: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:42:51 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jan 2004 05:42:51.0697 (UTC) FILETIME=[EB2D1A10:01C3D8CE] cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail aliases not worked as expected X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:43:04 -0000 >On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 03:50:03PM +0000, mgmcomm @hotmail.com wrote: > > > When a cron or periodic task creates an email to say root...it gets >mailed > > to root@host.domain.com instead of root@domain.com. Which results in an > > error message > >That's by design, believe it or not. 'root' is a member of class E -- >Exposed Users -- whose e-mail addresses won't be rewritten by >genericstable processing or the like. > Well I used to be able to do this. Is this a 5.x design? How might I be able to get it to work the way it used to? This behavior doesn't seem limited to root. but to kib and virtualuser as well. I can only assume hat it applies to any alias or real user. > > Jan 7 03:03:01 butters sm-mta[1511]: i07331me001498: SYSERR(root): > > butters.kibserv.org. config error: mail loops back to me (MX problem?) > >On your mail host, you need to add the names of all of the hosts you >provide mail service for to the /etc/mail/local-host-names file, one >per line. > My mail host is qmail/vpopmail. Actually its Matt Simerson's mail toaster at http://matt.simerson.net. My local-host-names is actually a mysql table and considering the number of machines involved this is going to be a difficult task to maintain unless I can find a way to use some sort of globing (*.domain.com or such). Although this problem is for the toaster mailing list to assist me on if it comes down to that. This mail host is set to accept all mail for kibserv.org and example.com. Both are test domains. It seems to receive mail just fine when it gets postmaster@kibserv.com but not say postmaster@host.kibserv.org. Actually I don't even think user@host.domain.com ever gets to the mail host...if I dig for mx records on host.domain.com it comes up with no answer and the default for sendmail it to send mail directly (basically to localhost) when no mx is found. So I suppose a work around would be to add an mx record for every host but that doesn't seem like a clean solution to the problem. > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > > kibserv.org. 1H IN MX 10 mail.kibserv.org. > > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > > mail.kibserv.org. 1H IN CNAME stan.kibserv.org. > > stan.kibserv.org. 1H IN A 10.0.0.8 > >Not relevant to your current problem, but you've got your MX pointed >to a CNAME. That's bad karma and not permitted by the DNS standards. >You should make mail.kibserv.org into an A record like so: > >mail.kibserv.org. 1H IN A 10.0.0.8 >stan.kibserv.org. 1H IN A 10.0.0.8 > >and similarly, provide PTR records for both names: > >$ORIGIN 0.0.10.in-addr.arpa. > >8 1H IN PTR mail.kibserv.org. > PTR stan.kibserv.org. > Good point. I will reconfigure as you suggest. The cname mail.kibserv.org is mainly useful for getting web mail users to the proper place. Thanks Jason Cribbins _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 21:47:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17FAA16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:47:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.richardflanagan.com.au (gateway.richardflanagan.com.au [203.149.71.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD57443D46 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:47:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from akozak@richardflanagan.com.au) Received: from akozak (akozak.richardflanagan.com.au [192.168.0.21]) by mail.richardflanagan.com.au (Postfix) with SMTP id AC63C218BFF for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:49:01 +1000 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <400236BC.000003.02032@AKOZAK> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:55:08 +1000 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Mailer: IncrediMail (2501324) From: "Andrew Kozak" To: "FreeBSD Questions" X-FID: PLAINTXT-NONE-0000-0000-000000000000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 Subject: panic: contigmalloc1 size must be 0 - interim fix X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:47:57 -0000 Hi all I am a very stubborn user and refuse to return to windows, even in the face of a kernel panic ;-)~. I posted last week on this problem I havce of the contigmalloc1 error associated with the Ali (Alladin) chipset. Instead of going forward (newer releases) I have had some limited success so far by doing just the opposite. I noticed on the FreeBSD website that the Alladin chipset is supposedly supported till 4.9, however, I have found so far that 4.7 is the latest release to actually support this chipset. (I think, I am cvsupping to 4.8 ATM, I will post if I have success there) The problem seems to lie in the pkg-config file, for an upgraded system anyway as when I try and install gnome2, this is when my system falls apart every time. pkg_add has no effect, thinking the problem was a dependency, I gave this a try and failed in the same fashion. All gnome reliant apps fail it seems. Another major problem I found was that drivers did not work properly, I experimented with a few and after some trials, I found that the vesa driver solved my X probs, sound etc was the same, experiment untill you find one that works (I am certain I have been using the correct dirver as well, it just did not work, whenever I invoked X, I would geta blank screen and the whole computer would become disabled - I did make notes of all my hardware before installing) If you are interested in adding coments, or telling me that I have explained this badly, please cc me as I am not on the list. I will post again when I have FreeBSD up and running relatively bugfree. As I say, this worked for me and there seems to be no post regarding this bug. Hoping I can help someone out here Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 21:54:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B59616A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:54:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60AE743D45 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:54:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i0C5s4i14592; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:54:05 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: Paul Hoffman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:54:03 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401112154.03939.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: How do I add a third ATA controller to 4.8? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:54:08 -0000 On Sunday 11 January 2004 09:13 pm, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Greetings again. I have a Dell 600SC that has three ATA controllers > on the motherboard, and I'm running 4.8 quite happily on it. The > GENERIC kernel has the following: > > device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 > device ata1 at isa? port IO_WD2 irq 15 > > Since I didn't know the irq used by the third controller (it's not > listed in their documentation, of course!), I blithely tried adding: > > device ata2 at isa? port IO_WD3 > > However, when rebuilding this kernel, I get the following error: > > cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline > -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. > -I../../../include -I../../contrib/ipfilter -D_KERNEL -include > opt_global.h -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 ioconf.c > ioconf.c:48: `IO_WD3' undeclared here (not in a function) > ioconf.c:48: initializer element is not constant > ioconf.c:48: (near initialization for `ata2_resources[1].u.longval') > *** Error code 1 > > So, what am I supposed to add to the kernel to add this third controller? > I have used several mobos that had 4 controllers on them. I did't have to do anything but add an HD and turn them on in the bios. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 21:59:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC39C16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:59:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5549143D41 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:59:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Received: from [10.0.2.2] (adsl-63-202-92-157.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.92.157]) (authenticated bits=0) by above.proper.com (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0C5xlic089527; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:59:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: phoffprop@mail.proper.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <200401112154.03939.kstewart@owt.com> References: <200401112154.03939.kstewart@owt.com> X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 21:59:48 -0800 To: Kent Stewart , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Paul Hoffman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Subject: Re: How do I add a third ATA controller to 4.8? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:59:54 -0000 At 9:54 PM -0800 1/11/04, Kent Stewart wrote: >I have used several mobos that had 4 controllers on them. I did't have to do >anything but add an HD and turn them on in the bios. I would have hoped that that was the case here too, but it doesn't seem to be. The new drive is definitely listed in the Dell's BIOS (I set it to "automatic" and on reboot the BIOS recognized its size correctly). --Paul Hoffman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 23:19:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEA2216A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:19:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from grenada.globat.com (grenada.globat.com [203.22.204.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D03E43D1D for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:19:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@mazenalzogbi.com) Received: from tonga.globat.com (tonga.globat.com [203.22.204.117]) by grenada.globat.com (8.12.6p3/8.2004.1) with SMTP id i0C7JkLA090719 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:19:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@mazenalzogbi.com) Received: (qmail 26783 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2004 07:19:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO MAZEN) (217.165.189.219) by tonga.globat.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2004 07:19:45 -0000 From: "Mazen S. Alzogbi" To: Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:18:57 +0400 Message-ID: <1691D8C9A2220149A8AF30209B5D0EB467F569@sc3.shuaacapital.co.ae> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <1691D8C9A2220149A8AF30209B5D0EB4CF2E06@sc3.shuaacapital.co.ae> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Sound not working on laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:19:54 -0000 Hi, Thanks for all the help. I tried to locate a 'Non Plug-and-Play OS' option in the BIOS setup with no success. I think there aren't anything like this in my BIOS. Can someone on this list shed some light how to detect (track) IRQs and conflicts? Thanks, Mazen > Yes, it is solvable. In your system BIOS, make certain that your system is > set to 'Non Plug-and-Play OS.' This will enable the BIOS to assign > appropriate IRQs and such. You have some conflict, which I'm not 100% > certain on how to track. Someone on this list should be able to answer that > part. Once you figure this out, you should set a line in your kernel config > (not sure on syntax) to the effect of assiging an unused IRQ. It IS > recognizing your sound card and trying to use it, but it's running into an > Input/Output (that's where it gets IO in IO port space) conflict. > -- > Eric F Crist > AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc > (612) 998-3588 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 23:34:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D79916A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:34:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.noos.fr (nan-smtp-15.noos.net [212.198.2.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E150143D2F for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:34:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: (qmail 3248 invoked by uid 0); 12 Jan 2004 07:34:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [10.0.1.3]) ([81.64.61.142]) (envelope-sender ) by 212.198.2.123 (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 12 Jan 2004 07:34:54 -0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.4.030702.0 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:34:53 +0100 From: Greg Bernard To: Mike Maltese Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <002401c3d890$044d9770$f4f0a8c0@pcmedx.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: Re: Other ways than quotas to limit mail files size ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:34:58 -0000 Le 11/01/04 23:12, =AB=A0Mike Maltese=A0=BB a =E9crit=A0: >> Is there another way to limit the amount of space occupied by mail files > on >> a per user basis using another method than quotas ? >=20 >> I would like to limit the amount of space available for each user's e.ma= il >> so e.mail file size will not go crazy. >=20 > Is there an option to limit message size with the MTA you are using? >=20 Well I don't know, that's my question... I am using sendmail. ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF Gregober ---> PGP ID --> 0x1BA3C2FD omni_osx_ml @at@ todoo.biz ________________________________________________ =AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7=AB?=BB=A5=AB?=BB=A7 =AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF=AF From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 11 23:47:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B05916A4D0 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:47:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from haggis.it.ca (haggis.it.ca [216.126.86.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FFCA43D3F for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:47:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from paul@haggis.it.ca) Received: from haggis.it.ca (paul@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by haggis.it.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0C7lEMn086081; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 02:47:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from paul@haggis.it.ca) Received: (from paul@localhost) by haggis.it.ca (8.12.9p2/8.12.6/Submit) id i0C7lDv7086080; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 02:47:13 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from paul) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 02:47:13 -0500 From: Paul Chvostek To: Greg Bernard Message-ID: <20040112074713.GA83794@mail.it.ca> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: Re: Other ways than quotas to limit mail files size ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:47:16 -0000 On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 09:24:28PM +0100, Greg Bernard wrote: > > Is there another way to limit the amount of space occupied by mail files on > a per user basis using another method than quotas ? > > I would like to limit the amount of space available for each user's e.mail > so e.mail file size will not go crazy. What exactly do you want to do? Filesystem quotas will cause a bounce message to be returned to the sender indicating that the recipient was over quota. That's generally the preferred way because the operating system takes care of most of it. You could modify that bounce message to include "friendlier" text if the default text is a problem for you. Alternately, you could implement a solution using procmail, with a small tool like http://www.it.ca/software/fsizecompare.c to determine existing filesize and behave accordingly. Or you could come up with other clever behaviour based on whatever criteria you dream up. But you have to dream it up first. Figure out exactly what you want to do with your users' mail. Then try to write something that does it. And if you have problems with that, come back to the list and ask for advice. :-) p -- Paul Chvostek it.canada http://www.it.ca/ Free PHP web hosting! http://www.it.ca/web/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 00:00:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E820E16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:00:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from munk.nu (mail.munk.nu [213.152.51.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBF143D72 for ; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 23:59:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from munk@munk.nu) Received: from munk by munk.nu with local (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1Afwyw-0007lk-5k; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:59:30 +0000 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:59:30 +0000 From: Jez Hancock To: Greg Bernard Message-ID: <20040112075930.GA29509@users.munk.nu> Mail-Followup-To: Greg Bernard , Mike Maltese , 'FreeBSD Questions' References: <002401c3d890$044d9770$f4f0a8c0@pcmedx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Mike Maltese cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: Re: Other ways than quotas to limit mail files size ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:00:14 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 08:34:53AM +0100, Greg Bernard wrote: > Le 11/01/04 23:12, ??Mike Maltese?? a ?crit?: > >> Is there another way to limit the amount of space occupied by mail files > > on > >> a per user basis using another method than quotas ? > >> I would like to limit the amount of space available for each user's e.mail > >> so e.mail file size will not go crazy. > > Is there an option to limit message size with the MTA you are using? > Well I don't know, that's my question... > I am using sendmail. Exim can do quotas. http://www.exim.org/ also in the ports: /usr/ports/mail/exim/ I've never actually used the quota system myself in Exim but it sounds relatively straightforward - from the specifications for Exim: quota Type: string* Default: unset This option imposes a limit on the size of the file to which Exim is appending, or to the total space used in the directory tree when the "directory" option is set. In the latter case, computation of the space used is expensive, because all the files in the directory (and any sub- directories) have to be individually inspected and their sizes summed (but see "quota_size_regex" below). Also, there is no interlock against two simultaneous deliveries into a multi-file mailbox. For single-file mailboxes, of course, an interlock is a necessity. A file's size is taken as its "used" value. Because of blocking effects, this may be a lot less than the actual amount of disk space allocated to the file. If the sizes of a number of files are being added up, the rounding effect can become quite noticeable, especially on systems that have large block sizes. Nevertheless, it seems best to stick to the "used" figure, because this is the obvious value which users understand most easily. The value of the option is expanded, and must then be a numerical value (decimal point allowed), optionally followed by one of the letters K or M. A value of zero unsets the option. The expansion happens while Exim is running as root, before it changes uid for the delivery. This means that files which are inaccessible to the end user can be used to hold quota values that are looked up in the expansion. When delivery fails because this quota is exceeded, the handling of the error is as for system quota failures. By default, Exim's quota checking mimics system quotas, and restricts the mailbox to the specified maximum size, though the value is not accurate to the last byte, owing to separator lines and additional headers that may get added during message delivery. When a mailbox is nearly full, large messages may get refused even though small ones are accepted, because the size of the current message is added to the quota when the check is made. This behaviour can be changed by setting "quota_is_inclusive" false. When this is done, the check for exceeding the quota does not include the current message. Thus, deliveries continue until the quota has been exceeded; thereafter, no further messages are delivered. See also "quota_warn_threshold". quota_directory Type: string* Default: unset This option defines the directory to check for quota purposes when delivering into individual files. The default is the delivery directory, or, if a file called maildirfolder exists in a maildir directory, the parent of the delivery directory. quota_filecount Type: string* Default: 0 This option applies when the "directory" option is set. It limits the total number of files in the directory (compare the inode limit in system quotas). It can only be used if "quota" is also set. The value is expanded; an expansion failure causes delivery to be deferred. quota_is_inclusive Type: boolean Default: true See "quota" above. quota_size_regex Type: string Default: unset This option applies when one of the delivery modes that writes a separate file for each message is being used. When Exim wants to find the size of one of these files in order to test the quota, it first checks "quota_size_regex". If this is set to a regular expression that matches the file name, and it captures one string, that string is interpreted as a representation of the file's size. The value of "quota_size_regex" is not expanded. This feature is useful only when users have no shell access to their mailboxes - otherwise they could defeat the quota simply by renaming the files. This facility can be used with maildir deliveries, by setting "maildir_tag" to add the file length to the file name. For example: maildir_tag = ,S=$message_size quota_size_regex = ,S=(\d+) The regular expression should not assume that the length is at the end of the file name (even though "maildir_tag" puts it there) because maildir MUAs sometimes add other information onto the ends of message file names. quota_warn_message Type: string* Default: see below See below for the use of this option. If it is not set when "quota_warn_threshold" is set, it defaults to quota_warn_message = "\ To: $local_part@$domain\n\ Subject: Your mailbox\n\n\ This message is automatically created \ by mail delivery software.\n\n\ The size of your mailbox has exceeded \ a warning threshold that is\n\ set by the system administrator.\n" quota_warn_threshold Type: string* Default: 0 This option is expanded in the same way as "quota" (see above). If the resulting value is greater than zero, and delivery of the message causes the size of the file or total space in the directory tree to cross the given threshold, a warning message is sent. If "quota" is also set, the threshold may be specified as a percentage of it by following the value with a percent sign. For example: quota = 10M quota_warn_threshold = 75% If "quota" is not set, a setting of "quota_warn_threshold" that ends with a percent sign is ignored. The warning message itself is specified by the "quota_warn_message" option, and it must start with a To: header line containing the recipient(s). A Subject: line should also normally be supplied. The "quota" option does not have to be set in order to use this option; they are independent of one another except when the threshold is specified as a percentage. -- Jez Hancock - System Administrator / PHP Developer http://munk.nu/ http://jez.hancock-family.com/ - personal weblog http://ipfwstats.sf.net/ - ipfw peruser traffic logging From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 00:06:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7FC16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:06:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns2.alphaque.com (ns2.alphaque.com [202.75.47.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0251D43D5D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:06:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: (qmail 67336 invoked by uid 0); 12 Jan 2004 08:05:59 -0000 Received: from lucifer.net-gw.com (HELO prophet.alphaque.com) (202.75.47.153) by lucifer.net-gw.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2004 08:05:59 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.alphaque.com [127.0.0.1]) by prophet.alphaque.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0C4M7ac036148; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:22:07 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:22:07 +0800 (MYT) From: Dinesh Nair To: David Miller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040112120129.L336-100000@prophet.alphaque.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: routing to specific network X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:06:07 -0000 On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, David Miller wrote: > So you want packets for 60.6.* to go out through ISP2? it is amazing that how something which completely stumps you at 4am, suddenly becomes so clear after some sleep and coffee at 11am. i added a route for 60.6/16, but was trying to traceroute 61.6/16. the mistake kept perpetuating because i kept using the shell's history to run the traceroute, and the mind could not tell the difference between the 0 and the 1. my bad, and much apologies. all works fine now. > Zebra implemets a number of routing protocols, including bgp. With BGP > you can pick the best route *out* for your packet, but everyone else's > BGP sessions will decide the best route *in* for you. In other words, to me, if i can pick the source ip address of my _outgoing_ packet, i.e. on which interface the connection is made, i'd be a happy camper. since i have two interfaces with two ip addies, the first http connection can have a 192.168.0/24 ip address, with the flow being carried on fxp0. the second http connection have have a 10.1/16 address with the flow being carried on the aue0. that would actually solve the problem, without having to set up multiple static routes. would this be possible ? thanx a bunch, david. Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 01:20:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFC316A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 01:20:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.mailbox.co.uk (smtp.mailbox.net.uk [195.82.125.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6CE43D48 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 01:20:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sysadmin@stjamessengirls.org.uk) Received: from [212.18.245.194] (helo=SJMOBILE11) by smtp.mailbox.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1AfyEs-0001mX-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:20:03 +0000 Message-ID: <002c01c3d8ed$57300740$0b00000a@stjames.net> From: "Martyn Hill" To: "Paul Hoffman" References: Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:20:37 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4927.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200 cc: FreeBSD-questions Subject: Re: How do I add a third ATA controller to 4.8? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:20:11 -0000 Paul I notice that the kernel config file you present is using the "old" device ata lines - is the ATA controller a particularly old model? If not, then the LINT kernel config file shows an alternative, viz device ata # just one entry for all ata controllers, no need to reference IRQs etc... device atadisk # for your IDE disks device atapicd # for your CD-ROM like devices You should comment out the ata0/ata1 lines before adding the above (and additionally, remove any "device wd*" lines in that section.) Then rebuild your kernel. Hope that helps. Martyn Hill Network Administrator St James Independent School London ----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Hoffman" To: Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 5:13 AM Subject: How do I add a third ATA controller to 4.8? > Greetings again. I have a Dell 600SC that has three ATA controllers > on the motherboard, and I'm running 4.8 quite happily on it. The > GENERIC kernel has the following: > > device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 > device ata1 at isa? port IO_WD2 irq 15 > > Since I didn't know the irq used by the third controller (it's not > listed in their documentation, of course!), I blithely tried adding: > > device ata2 at isa? port IO_WD3 > > However, when rebuilding this kernel, I get the following error: > > cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline > -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. > -I../../../include -I../../contrib/ipfilter -D_KERNEL -include > opt_global.h -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 ioconf.c > ioconf.c:48: `IO_WD3' undeclared here (not in a function) > ioconf.c:48: initializer element is not constant > ioconf.c:48: (near initialization for `ata2_resources[1].u.longval') > *** Error code 1 > > So, what am I supposed to add to the kernel to add this third controller? > > --Paul Hoffman > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 01:25:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E095A16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 01:25:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069EE43D55 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 01:25:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp104-184.lns1.adl1.internode.on.net [150.101.104.184])i0C9PrqR099980; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:55:54 +1030 (CST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Malcolm Kay Organization: At home To: Paul Hoffman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:55:53 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200401121955.53383.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Subject: Re: How do I add a third ATA controller to 4.8? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:25:59 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:43, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Greetings again. I have a Dell 600SC that has three ATA controllers > on the motherboard, and I'm running 4.8 quite happily on it. The > GENERIC kernel has the following: > > device ata0 at isa? port IO_WD1 irq 14 > device ata1 at isa? port IO_WD2 irq 15 > I gather that these lines or for legacy isa based controllers and have li= ttle relevance for reasonably modern machines. A single line: device ata should cope with all the ATA controllers on a current model PC. > Since I didn't know the irq used by the third controller (it's not > listed in their documentation, of course!), I blithely tried adding: > > device ata2 at isa? port IO_WD3 > > However, when rebuilding this kernel, I get the following error: > > cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline > -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../.. > -I../../../include -I../../contrib/ipfilter -D_KERNEL -include > opt_global.h -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3D2 ioconf.c > ioconf.c:48: `IO_WD3' undeclared here (not in a function) > ioconf.c:48: initializer element is not constant > ioconf.c:48: (near initialization for `ata2_resources[1].u.longval') > *** Error code 1 > I suspect you are being too clever; the GENERIC kernel will possibly find it. (No personal experience with 3 or more ATA controllers) Malcolm Kay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 01:41:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9738616A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 01:41:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from fubard.zapto.org (modemcable005.194-202-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.202.194.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A0F43D55 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 01:41:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rwong10@cs.mcgill.ca) Received: from geminga.my.fubard.ca (na@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fubard.zapto.org (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0C9eteT028642 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:40:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rwong10@cs.mcgill.ca) Received: from localhost (mout@localhost)i0C9esJb028639 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:40:55 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: geminga.my.fubard.ca: mout owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:40:54 -0500 (EST) From: rwong10 X-X-Sender: mout@geminga.my.fubard.ca To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040112043546.T28537@geminga.my.fubard.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: diskless clients X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:41:14 -0000 Hi I am experimenting with setting up a freebsd server to boot diskless clients. I am currently running 4.8R. I've followed the instructions found in the handbook and augmented that with the comments found in /usr/share/examples/diskless/clone_root. My problem is with the cloned root filesystem. It does not appear that the /conf/* directories are overriding the contents found in /diskless_root/etc. What happens is, I boot up via etherboot, the kernel downloads and loads up successfully. When it comes time to process the information in /etc, it is actually reading the cloned config files from the server. In particular, fstab...I have a modified fstab in /conf/default/etc yet the cloned fstab is still being read. Can anyone who has had experience setting up diskless clients offer some suggestions? thanks robin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 01:54:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D9916A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 01:54:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from geminix.org (gen129.n001.c02.escapebox.net [213.73.91.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12CE743D62 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 01:54:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gemini@geminix.org) Message-ID: <40026EBC.1000108@geminix.org> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:54:04 +0100 From: Uwe Doering Organization: Private UNIX Site User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031206 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 'FreeBSD Questions' References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Received: from gemini by geminix.org with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1Afylp-0002LQ-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:54:05 +0100 Subject: Re: Other ways than quotas to limit mail files size ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:54:09 -0000 Greg Bernard wrote: > Is there another way to limit the amount of space occupied by mail files on > a per user basis using another method than quotas ? > > I would like to limit the amount of space available for each user's e.mail > so e.mail file size will not go crazy. You could switch to Cyrus IMAP, which is a complete IMAP4/POP3 email storage subsystem with file system independent quotas. Uwe -- Uwe Doering | EscapeBox - Managed On-Demand UNIX Servers gemini@geminix.org | http://www.escapebox.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 01:58:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB63916A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 01:58:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.mailbox.co.uk (smtp.mailbox.co.uk [195.82.125.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255CF43D5F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 01:58:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.hill@stjamessengirls.org.uk) Received: from [212.18.245.194] (helo=SJMOBILE11) by smtp.mailbox.co.uk with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1Afypl-0004JM-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:58:09 +0000 Message-ID: <001701c3d8f2$aa014100$0b00000a@stjames.net> From: "Martyn Hill" To: "FreeBSD-questions" Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:58:43 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4927.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4927.1200 Subject: How do I install latest Samba (3.0.1) from ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:58:11 -0000 Dear all Is it just a matter of time before the samba 3.0.1 port is made available from the ports tree (/net/samba-devel) or is there another way to coherently patch the 3.0.0 install without screwing-up the ports install? TIA. Martyn Hill Network Administrator St James Independent School London From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 02:46:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A4616A4D0 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 02:46:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EEB7443D7D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 02:45:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ph.schulz@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 11314 invoked by uid 0); 12 Jan 2004 10:45:25 -0000 Received: from 217.159.0.92 by www46.gmx.net with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:45:25 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:45:25 +0100 (MET) From: "Philip Schulz" To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Authenticated: #1954550 Message-ID: <21321.1073904325@www46.gmx.net> X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 1.6 (Global Message Exchange) X-Flags: 0001 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [OT] Configuration file parsing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:46:24 -0000 Hello! Let me apologize for asking an offtopic question. If you feel offended, please ignore this eMail. I'm currently working on a program which will be used in a closed company environment. The programm is written in C. For this program, I need to find a way of parsing a configuration file. I found a library which can do exactly what I need, it's GLib's lexical scanner [1]. However, it's licensed under the GPL, so I guess it won't work for me. So my question: How can I easily parse a configuration file? Any pointers appreciated. Thanks, Philip [1] http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/glib/glib-utilities.html -- +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++ Neu: Preissenkung für MMS und FreeMMS! http://www.gmx.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 03:10:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814F116A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 03:10:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from madras.dyndns.org (dsl-137.241.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.241.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9C643D1D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 03:10:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ggop@madras.dyndns.org) Received: from madras.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by madras.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0CB9ZL9008929; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:09:35 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from ggop@madras.dyndns.org) Received: (from ggop@localhost) by madras.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9/Submit) id i0CB9YYb008928; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:09:34 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:09:33 +1100 From: Gautam Gopalakrishnan To: Philip Schulz Message-ID: <20040112110933.GA8911@madras.dyndns.org> References: <21321.1073904325@www46.gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21321.1073904325@www46.gmx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT] Configuration file parsing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:10:55 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:45:25AM +0100, Philip Schulz wrote: > Hello! > > Let me apologize for asking an offtopic question. If you feel offended, > please ignore this eMail. > > I'm currently working on a program which will be used in a closed company > environment. The programm is written in C. For this program, I need to find > a > way of parsing a configuration file. I found a library which can do exactly > what I need, it's GLib's lexical scanner [1]. However, it's licensed under > the > GPL, so I guess it won't work for me. > So my question: How can I easily parse a configuration file? Any pointers > appreciated. Guess for windows ini files, you could use: http://freshmeat.net/projects/inifileparser/ Gautam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 03:21:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8EC416A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 03:21:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from zim.0x7e.net (zim.0x7e.net [203.38.184.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F5F43D1F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 03:21:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from listone@deathbeforedecaf.net) Received: from goo.0x7e.net ([203.38.184.164] helo=goo) by zim.0x7e.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1Ag07y-000Hii-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:51:02 +1030 Message-ID: <001101c3d8fe$295c1820$a4b826cb@goo> From: "Rob" To: "Philip Schulz" , References: <21321.1073904325@www46.gmx.net> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:51:02 +1030 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: [OT] Configuration file parsing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:21:21 -0000 Philip Schulz wrote on Monday January 12, 2004: > I'm currently working on a program which will be used in a closed company > environment. The programm is written in C. For this program, I need to find > a > way of parsing a configuration file. I found a library which can do exactly > what I need, it's GLib's lexical scanner [1]. However, it's licensed under > the > GPL, so I guess it won't work for me. As far as I understand it, the main requirement of the GPL is that you make the source available to the same people that use the binaries. So if your program was never released outside the company, an internal FTP server hosting the source should be sufficent. Are there other aspects of the GPL that make it unsuitable for your project? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 03:33:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB0916A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 03:33:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2AD143D5E for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 03:33:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i0CBWufn007825 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:32:56 GMT (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i0CBWuT5007824; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:32:56 GMT (envelope-from matthew) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:32:56 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman To: Martyn Hill Message-ID: <20040112113256.GA7627@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Martyn Hill , FreeBSD-questions References: <001701c3d8f2$aa014100$0b00000a@stjames.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001701c3d8f2$aa014100$0b00000a@stjames.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: FreeBSD-questions Subject: Re: How do I install latest Samba (3.0.1) from ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:33:14 -0000 --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 09:58:43AM -0000, Martyn Hill wrote: > Is it just a matter of time before the samba 3.0.1 port is made available > from the ports tree (/net/samba-devel) or is there another way to coheren= tly > patch the 3.0.0 install without screwing-up the ports install? The port maintainer will be much better able to answer your question than we can. If you want to gain karma points you could have a go at updating the port to 3.0.1 yourself and then send off the diff to the maintainer, but only if you're confident that you've made the updated port work properly. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAAoXodtESqEQa7a0RAj5HAKCFRhD8mUK2N9yZvxH8cFGnn87uxACeJja8 seXszDVZsUjm/mHBwAvxuF8= =V+uI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 04:42:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A767C16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:42:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx0.rambler.ru (mx0.rambler.ru [81.19.66.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2080443D5E for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:42:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from twistfire@rambler.ru) Received: from mailc.rambler.ru (mailc.rambler.ru [81.19.66.27]) by mx0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FC9D43E5E7 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:42:03 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from twistfire@rambler.ru) Received: from fire (vv.abc.mk.ua [62.64.91.250]) by mailc.rambler.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i0CCdRLO020879 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:39:30 +0300 (MSK) Message-ID: <000601c3d909$60a86e90$0500a8c0@fire> From: "Alex Zivenko" To: Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:24:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Auth-User: (null), whoson: twistfire@rambler.ru Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: xmms - problem - how to fix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:42:11 -0000 Hi! I have some problem with my xmms mm player. When I'm treing to listen = some mp3's it gives me aN error, that I don't know how to fix. I have = KDE 3.1 if you need this info ^) So here it is: bash-2.05b$ xmms /dev/dsp: Device busy /dev/dsp: Device busy /* with OSS driver */ ** WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): = Device busy ** WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): = Device busy ** WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): = Device busy /dev/dsp: Device busy when i'm truing ESOund driver it gives me an error esd: Esound sound daemon already running or stale UNIX socket /tmp/.esd/socket This socket already exists indicating esd is already running. Exiting... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 04:56:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7237A16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:56:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BB8D43D64 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 04:56:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from barner@in.tum.de) Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 887F2935F; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:56:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:56:19 +0100 From: Simon Barner To: Alex Zivenko Message-ID: <20040112125619.GA3308@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <000601c3d909$60a86e90$0500a8c0@fire> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000601c3d909$60a86e90$0500a8c0@fire> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xmms - problem - how to fix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:56:27 -0000 --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > I have some problem with my xmms mm player. When I'm treing to > listen some mp3's it gives me aN error, that I don't know how to fix. > I have KDE 3.1 if you need this info ^) > So here it is: > bash-2.05b$ xmms > /dev/dsp: Device busy > /dev/dsp: Device busy > /* with OSS driver */ >=20 > ** WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): Device= busy >=20 > ** WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): Device= busy >=20 > ** WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): Device= busy > /dev/dsp: Device busy I don't know exactly, but if XmmS has an arts output plugin, you should certainly use it, since arts is KDE's default sound daemon. > when i'm truing ESOund driver it gives me an error > esd: Esound sound daemon already running or stale UNIX socket > /tmp/.esd/socket > This socket already exists indicating esd is already running. > Exiting... Does it work when you remove that stale socket? If none of the above works, you can use the following command to find out which process bocks your dsp device: fstat | grep dsp Regards, Simon --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAAplzCkn+/eutqCoRAs3eAKDBeFwS2kAUEWNTmmqpaBnNuACHjgCfdGID 3b0+3I0EtkmHck4OlGfc66Y= =XcxP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 05:17:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24B316A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:17:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from search.sparks.net (search.sparks.net [207.5.180.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733C943D39 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:17:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dmiller@miningworks.com) Received: by search.sparks.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id B44EAA902; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:17:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by search.sparks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEF6A901; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:17:19 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:17:19 -0500 (EST) From: David Miller X-Sender: dmiller@search.sparks.net To: Q In-Reply-To: <1073885478.32551.17.camel@boxster.onthenet.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: dmiller@miningworks.com cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Speak Freely X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:17:21 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Q wrote: > On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 05:52, David Miller wrote: > > Hi All; > > > > I've spent the last two days trying to get speak freely (Internet voice > > program with encryption, see > > If you are intending to use this out of more than just curiosity you > might want to look at alternatives like some of the OpenH323 clients > (eg. net/gnomemeeting), as this particular program will be officially > 'End of Life'ed by its author on the 15th of this month. I know about the end-of-life message. For now, at least, it doesn't bother me. I just now looked at gnomemeeting. It doesn't appear to support encryption. Do you know if there's a way to keep private conversations private, short of VPN's or the like? > > Speakfreely was first installed from ports, then compiled in half duplex > > mode. If I launch sfspeaker -d from one window, and sfmike -d some.host > > from another, I get the following error from sfspeaker: > > > > new:dmiller$ sfspeaker -d > > sfspeaker: 10.0.0.3 packet lost by half-duplex muting. > > sfspeaker: 10.0.0.3 packet lost by half-duplex muting. > > sfspeaker: 10.0.0.3 packet lost by half-duplex muting. > > This is exactly what's supposed to happen when you compile it with half > duplex mode enabled. You should recompile it without defining > HALF_DUPLEX (which should be the default) if you want this behaviour to > stop. I started out with full duplex. The error message said to compile it in half duplex. > > One other thing that seems odd is that sound from the mike comes through > > the speakers even when sfmike is "paused". > > If this is sound from your locally connected mic, then this is probably > a mixer 'input source' issue more than anything else. Try playing with > the 'rec' and 'mic' input level and see if it makes any difference. I didn't observe this on a windows machine against an echo server. My freebsd box doesn't "speak" anything from an echo server, just gives me the error messag above. From looking briefly at the code, it looks like speakfreely thinks something else already has exclusive access to the card. man pcm indicates that the driver is full duplex, for those cards which support it. I tried a card with the yamaha chip (opl, iirc) that certainly supported it, with the same results. sflaunch should work with half duplex drivers/devices, but I don't get any sound echoed back from echo servers with it either, just the muting message above. What am I doing wrong? --- David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 05:22:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2D8616A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:22:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from lilith.bellavista.cz (bellavista.worldonline.cz [212.90.245.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D6343D46 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:22:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from neuhauser@bellavista.cz) Received: from freepuppy.bellavista.cz (freepuppy.bellavista.cz [10.0.0.10]) by lilith.bellavista.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D3263; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:22:12 +0100 (CET) Received: by freepuppy.bellavista.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2B0AE2FDA10; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:22:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:22:12 +0100 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Larry Hammer Message-ID: <20040112132212.GD4577@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Larry Hammer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200401091257.26487.larrykh465@SoftHome.net> <20040109234237.GN5994@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> <200401101512.43418.larrykh465@SoftHome.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401101512.43418.larrykh465@SoftHome.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New to FreeBSD 4.9 questions about configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:22:21 -0000 # larrykh465@SoftHome.net / 2004-01-10 15:12:42 -0800: > On Friday 09 January 2004 03:42 pm, you wrote: > > # larrykh465@SoftHome.net / 2004-01-09 12:57:26 -0800: > > > Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s2a > > > ad0s2a: UDMA ICRC error writing fsbn 42387790 of 4160-4163 (ad0s2 bn > > > 42387790; cn 2638 tn 132 sn 4) retrying > > > ad0s2a: UDMA ICRC error writing fsbn 42387790 of 4160-4163 (ad0s2 bn > > > 42387790; cn 2638 tn 132 sn 4) retrying > > > ad0s2a: UDMA ICRC error writing fsbn 42387790 of 4160-4163 (ad0s2 bn > > > 42387790; cn 2638 tn 132 sn 4) retrying > > > ad0s2a: UDMA ICRC error writing fsbn 42379502 of 16-19 (ad0s2 bn > > > 42379502; cn 2638 tn 0 sn 32) retrying > > > ad0s2a: UDMA ICRC error writing fsbn 42379502 of 16-19 (ad0s2 bn > > > 42379502; cn 2638 tn 0 sn 32) retrying > > > ad0s2a: UDMA ICRC error writing fsbn 42379502 of 16-19 (ad0s2 bn > > > 42379502; cn 2638 tn 0 sn 32) retrying > > > ad0s2a: UDMA ICRC error writing fsbn 42379502 of 16-19 (ad0s2 bn > > > 42379502; cn 2638 tn 0 sn 32) falling back to PIO mode > > > in bois the hard drives pio mode is set to auto I have the options of > > > auto,and pio mode 1-5, I have tried to play with this abit but no > > > diference how do I either make the hard drive work with the udma mode > > > or configure the kernal to stay at pio mode in the first place? > > > > this error has several possible reasons, one of them being a crappy > > cable: > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2003-November/025669.html > after checking the cable to the hard drive it was the 80 wire 40 pin, in good > shape > > I pulled everything but the hard drive and booted, it fixed it, the cdrom that > I had setup as the slave on the ide0 bus seems to be conflicting, so I set up > the cdrom and zip on the second bus and marked the ide0 slave as "not > installed" in bios. > The UDMA ICRC errorer is gone and I now have UDMA 100 everything related to > storage works well now :>) aha. speed of both devices on the same cable is limited to the speed of the slowest device, IOW a hard disk (normally UDMA) + CDROM (normally PIO) on one disk means both run in PIO. I'm not sure wheter the ATA code could handle this more gracefully... -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 05:29:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E84516A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:29:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from search.sparks.net (search.sparks.net [207.5.180.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC1D43D53 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:29:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dmiller@miningworks.com) Received: by search.sparks.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 2F8E1A902; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:29:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by search.sparks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28650A901; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:29:07 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:29:07 -0500 (EST) From: David Miller X-Sender: dmiller@search.sparks.net To: Dinesh Nair In-Reply-To: <20040112120129.L336-100000@prophet.alphaque.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: dmiller@miningworks.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: routing to specific network X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:29:09 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Dinesh Nair wrote: > > On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, David Miller wrote: > > > So you want packets for 60.6.* to go out through ISP2? > > it is amazing that how something which completely stumps you at 4am, > suddenly becomes so clear after some sleep and coffee at 11am. i added a > route for 60.6/16, but was trying to traceroute 61.6/16. the mistake kept > perpetuating because i kept using the shell's history to run the > traceroute, and the mind could not tell the difference between the 0 and > the 1. my bad, and much apologies. all works fine now. Oops. Now if I had a dollar for every time *I'd* done something like that... > > > Zebra implemets a number of routing protocols, including bgp. With BGP > > you can pick the best route *out* for your packet, but everyone else's > > BGP sessions will decide the best route *in* for you. In other words, > > to me, if i can pick the source ip address of my _outgoing_ packet, i.e. > on which interface the connection is made, i'd be a happy camper. Isn't this equivilent to selecting the outbound route? You want to select 10.a.b.c uf you want the connection routed out ISP 1 and 192.168.x.y otherwise. > since i have two interfaces with two ip addies, the first http connection > can have a 192.168.0/24 ip address, with the flow being carried on fxp0. > the second http connection have have a 10.1/16 address with the flow being > carried on the aue0. that would actually solve the problem, without having > to set up multiple static routes. would this be possible ? I don't think that's really going to help much. You still have to have some basis for knowing which network you want to handle which connections. Unless you're doing heavy duty uploading somewhere you're very likely to be limited by your inbound bandwidth, so it doesn't really matter which interface you're going out anyway. FreeBSD should pick the "closest" IP address for any outgoing connections anyway. Say you had two "real" addresses so we can forget about NAT, 12.1.2.3 and 24.2.3.4. Say you routed 60.1/16 out the upstream for 24.2.3.4. Say you pinged 60.1.2.3. It would already see a source address on the ping packets of 24.2.3.4, not 12.1.2.3. You don't have to do anything special for that to happen - your application would have to bind to 12.1.2.3 exclusively in order for it to be the source address. There are bizzare cases where it might make sense to try and load balance two broadband connections, but they're really special cases and don't have general purpose solutions:( --- David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 05:49:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8329116A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:49:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BFF043D4C for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:49:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 6628 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2004 13:49:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (81.196.25.19) by mail.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 12 Jan 2004 13:49:12 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:50:34 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040112155034.57fd6a3c@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: cvsup strangeness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:49:24 -0000 Hi, A while ago I've posted : > I have 2 identical (copy/paste) ports-supfiles on two machines: > > it# grep -v '#' /etc/ports-supfile > *default host=cvsup.ro.FreeBSD.org > *default base=/usr > *default prefix=/usr > *default release=cvs tag=. > *default delete use-rel-suffix > *default compress > ports-all > > one is produceing : > Updating collection ports-all/cvs > Edit ports/audio/abcmidi/Makefile > Edit ports/audio/abcmidi/distinfo > ... > > The other: > Updating collection ports-all/cvs > Edit ports/mail/perdition/pkg-plist > Edit ports/math/R-letter/Makefile > SetAttrs ports/math/p5-Statistics-Distributions/Makefile,v > SetAttrs ports/math/p5-Statistics-Distributions/distinfo,v > ... > > I run it like: > # cvsup -g /etc/ports-supfile on both machines. > > The stupid question: > why on the second I have the `,v' suffix ? On the problem machine (4.7) it was installed cvsup-without-gui; now that I've deinstalled and installed cvsup it outputs OK (e.g. without `,v'), with the same cvsup config file. I wonder if: 1. anyone can reproduce this. 2. if 1. is it a bug or a feature. -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 06:04:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B1416A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 06:04:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from dexter.starfire.mn.org (starfire.skypoint.net [199.199.159.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68AF043D5A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 06:04:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from john@dexter.starfire.mn.org) Received: (from john@localhost) by dexter.starfire.mn.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id i0CE4K060764 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:04:20 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from john) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:04:20 -0600 From: John To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040112080420.A60685@starfire.mn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Subject: Problems with FreeBSD 4.8 on Compaq Armada M700 laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:04:25 -0000 Despite the fact that the laptop compatibility base has an entry for this machine that looks good for FreeBSD 5.0, I'm not having the best luck that one might hope. I've read through the Release notes and Hardware notes, and Errata on the web site for this release and on the CD (NFS mounted from my desktop-based FreeBSD 4.3 system - I know - I'm a little behind), I haven't found anything that seems to address anything like these issues: 1) The CD-ROM, which worked great to install the system, doesn't work when I boot from the hard-drive installed system. The MFS kernel reports Jan 11 17:56:56 pearl /kernel: acd0: CDROM at ata0-slave PIO but I just get "device not configured" when I boot the GENERIC kernel that was installed. /dev/acd0 does appear in the device directory, and I ran MAKEDEV on it, just to make double sure. 2) APM also says "device not configured". Don't know if this works with the MFS/installation kernel. 3) Even though xf86config seems to have correctly identified the adapter, and it works nicely at 1024x768, I can't seem to get the color depth working at anything other than 256. I have tried "startx -- -bpp 24" and "startx -- -bpp 32" and "startx -- -bpp 16" but it doesn't seem to matter. The PCMCIA/PC-Card stuff appears to be working, but I haven't tested it very thoroughly yet. I have xdm and kde up and running - so much is going well - but the CD-ROM issue is really slowing me down, and the display could sure use those extra colors... Maybe I should try a binary upgrade to 4.9, now that it's out? I don't currently have any reason to think that would help, but I haven't got any other "go forward" ideas, either. Thoughts, suggestions, redirections all appreciated! Thanks! -- John Lind john@starfire.MN.ORG From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 06:22:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C36716A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 06:22:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3E28F43D54 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 06:22:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adip@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 13901 invoked by uid 65534); 12 Jan 2004 14:22:18 -0000 Received: from ns.bitdefender.com (EHLO apircalabu.dsd.ro) (217.156.83.1) by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 12 Jan 2004 15:22:18 +0100 X-Authenticated: #6523796 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:19:05 +0200 From: Adrian Pircalabu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040112161905.4ffd7165.adip@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <00a901c3d740$3700e470$0301a8c0@bigdaddy> References: <20040109112853.0d94a748.adip@gmx.net> <20040109113351.79f0edb6.adip@gmx.net> <00a901c3d740$3700e470$0301a8c0@bigdaddy> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: how to use /boot/loader to load the kernel ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:22:23 -0000 On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 22:08:49 -0800 "Drew Tomlinson" wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Adrian Pircalabu" > To: > Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 1:33 AM > Subject: Re: how to use /boot/loader to load the kernel ? > > > > On Fri, 9 Jan 2004 11:28:53 +0200 > > Adrian Pircalabu wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > What can I do to use /boot/loader to load the kernel ? I can not > > > use various commands like top (nlist failed), vmstat( undefined > > > symbols:_kmemstatistics _bucket _zlist). > > > My fstab looks like this: > > > /dev/ad0s1b none swap sw 0 0 > > > /dev/ad0s2a / ufs rw,async 1 1 > > > /dev/ad0s2e /boot ufs rw,async 2 2 > > > /dev/ad0s2f /home ufs rw,async 2 2 > > > /dev/acd0c /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 > > > proc /proc procfs rw 0 0 > > > > > > I read the sections from handbook regarding boot stages, but I > > > could not find any clue. What other info should I provide to you? > > > Thank you. > > > > The problem arised after I upgraded from 4.7-RELEASE to 4-STABLE > > Most likely your world and kernel are out of sync. Read UPDATING and > follow the instructions carefully. I read /usr/src/UPDATING file, and I am afraid this issue has something to do with my partitioning layout. Right before boot2 I get this "No /boot/loader" error. After that, it starts loading /kernel and I get another error - "loader metadata missing". In /boot directory everything seems ok, all files are in the proper place, /boot/loader is 555. Could this be any sort of limitation in machine's BIOS ? > > Cheers, > > Drew > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Adi Pircalabu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 07:20:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289E416A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:20:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from rambo.401.cx (rambo.401.cx [80.65.205.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E88643D5A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:20:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from listsub@401.cx) Received: from 401.cx (132.dairy.twenty4help.se [80.65.195.132]) by rambo.401.cx (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0CFKBCT094354; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:20:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from listsub@401.cx) Message-ID: <4002BB26.5000207@401.cx> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:20:06 +0100 From: "Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: parv References: <200401070526.KAA22696@manage.24online> <20040107093835.37200.qmail@web40110.mail.yahoo.com> <20040107105332.GB55857@moo.holy.cow> In-Reply-To: <20040107105332.GB55857@moo.holy.cow> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Dino Vliet cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Size of /var worries me X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:20:28 -0000 parv wrote: > ...only thing that i desire(d) is/was to give / much less than 128MB, > but couldn't (during the space slicing). > > That and to combine /usr2 & /usr3 now. But default inode space > allocation of 8%/slice will kill me anyway. I really have to remember > about the newfs options next time. > Do you really mean inode space, or the 8% minimum free space treshold? If its the later, try this: umount /usr && tunefs -m 0 /dev/ad-whatever && mount /usr -- R From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 07:33:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9812016A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:33:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD4143D45 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:33:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ag43o-0002Lx-00 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:33:00 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ag43n-0002Lo-00 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:32:59 +0100 Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Ag43n-0006Qx-00 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:32:59 +0100 From: "Jared Cheney" Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:33:03 -0700 Lines: 79 Message-ID: References: X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Sender: news Subject: Re: Trouble getting network card to work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:33:03 -0000 Thanks for the suggestion. I tried this and unfortunately, it did not work :( Same behavior no matter what PCI slot I put it in. I have successfully been able to get an old ISA NE2000 card configured and up in the system, so I'm at least able to talk on the network. However, I'd really like to get the PCI card working, so I can get 100Mbps connections. Anyone have any other ideas? Thanks "fbsd_user" wrote in message news:MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGOEPNFDAA.fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com... > I just went through that on my pre Y2K PC using 4.9. Different PCI > Nic card, but same symptoms. Had to enable verbose boot messages. > Saw that every time I rebooted system the boot log showed an msg > saying something about unrecognized ID. I know the card was good so > I just kept moving the Nic card to different PCI slot, rebooting, > until it finally worked. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jared > Cheney > Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 4:28 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Trouble getting network card to work > > Hello, > > I've just installed FreeBSD 4.9 and am having trouble getting my > network > card to work. It is very odd, because it appears as though the > kernel > recognizes the card just fine and is using the pcn module to bring > it up, > etc. > > It is an AMD 79c79x card (according to FreeBSD). I can view/set > properties > via ifconfig - and it properly shows whether or not there is link. > I cannot > obtain a DHCP lease, nor can I ping any other hosts on my network > when I > have a static IP configured. > > To ensure that the NIC is fine and all cables, etc. - I booted from > a > bootable Linux CD (Knoppix), where I was able to use the card fine > to ping, > browse the Internet, etc. Linux showed it as an AMD 79c970 [PCNET32 > LANCE] > card. > > The card is called pcn0 in FreeBSD, and it says that it is sharing > IRQ 10. > Running tcpdump for any length of time also shows that 0 packets > were > received by the filter. > > Anyone have any ideas as to what could be the problem? > > Thanks, in advance, > Jared > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 07:37:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47FDB16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:37:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26ABA43D53 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:37:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.103]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20040112153728.CPHL1423.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish> for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:37:28 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:37:27 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: set env editor global X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:37:30 -0000 On an new install with only an root account, I want to set the command line prompt prefix and the default editor for all new users and also the root account. What file do I put the 'set env' commands in to make this happen globally? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 07:51:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECF216A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:51:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F0543D2F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:51:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from daleco.biz ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:54:44 -0600 Message-ID: <4002C223.5080205@daleco.biz> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:49:55 -0600 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031124 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jared Cheney References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jan 2004 15:54:45.0109 (UTC) FILETIME=[66133250:01C3D924] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trouble getting network card to work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:51:25 -0000 Jared Cheney wrote: >Thanks for the suggestion. I tried this and unfortunately, it did not work >:( Same behavior no matter what PCI slot I put it in. I have successfully >been able to get an old ISA NE2000 card configured and up in the system, so >I'm at least able to talk on the network. However, I'd really like to get >the PCI card working, so I can get 100Mbps connections. > >Anyone have any other ideas? > >Thanks > > Have you seen any of the error messages that are listed in the pcn(4) manual? Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 07:52:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E3016A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:52:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A472043D53 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:52:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.103]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20040112154936.LGSN18777.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:49:36 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Jared Cheney" , Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:49:34 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Trouble getting network card to work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:52:39 -0000 Add this to your kernel source and recompile the kernel. "device puc" This uses an more detailed approach to probing older bio's and motherboards PCI slots. I found this as an solution posted in the questions archives. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jared Cheney Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:33 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trouble getting network card to work Thanks for the suggestion. I tried this and unfortunately, it did not work :( Same behavior no matter what PCI slot I put it in. I have successfully been able to get an old ISA NE2000 card configured and up in the system, so I'm at least able to talk on the network. However, I'd really like to get the PCI card working, so I can get 100Mbps connections. Anyone have any other ideas? Thanks "fbsd_user" wrote in message news:MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGOEPNFDAA.fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com... > I just went through that on my pre Y2K PC using 4.9. Different PCI > Nic card, but same symptoms. Had to enable verbose boot messages. > Saw that every time I rebooted system the boot log showed an msg > saying something about unrecognized ID. I know the card was good so > I just kept moving the Nic card to different PCI slot, rebooting, > until it finally worked. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jared > Cheney > Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 4:28 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Trouble getting network card to work > > Hello, > > I've just installed FreeBSD 4.9 and am having trouble getting my > network > card to work. It is very odd, because it appears as though the > kernel > recognizes the card just fine and is using the pcn module to bring > it up, > etc. > > It is an AMD 79c79x card (according to FreeBSD). I can view/set > properties > via ifconfig - and it properly shows whether or not there is link. > I cannot > obtain a DHCP lease, nor can I ping any other hosts on my network > when I > have a static IP configured. > > To ensure that the NIC is fine and all cables, etc. - I booted from > a > bootable Linux CD (Knoppix), where I was able to use the card fine > to ping, > browse the Internet, etc. Linux showed it as an AMD 79c970 [PCNET32 > LANCE] > card. > > The card is called pcn0 in FreeBSD, and it says that it is sharing > IRQ 10. > Running tcpdump for any length of time also shows that 0 packets > were > received by the filter. > > Anyone have any ideas as to what could be the problem? > > Thanks, in advance, > Jared > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 08:06:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C95D16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:06:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6657343D39 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:06:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from pooh.strauser.com (pooh.honeypot.net [10.0.5.128]) by kanga.honeypot.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0CG632J058624 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:06:04 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <21321.1073904325@www46.gmx.net> <001101c3d8fe$295c1820$a4b826cb@goo> From: Kirk Strauser Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:06:00 -0600 In-Reply-To: <001101c3d8fe$295c1820$a4b826cb@goo> (listone@deathbeforedecaf.net's message of "Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:51:02 +1030") Message-ID: <874qv140ev.fsf@strauser.com> Lines: 18 X-Mailer: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: [OT] Configuration file parsing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:06:08 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2004-01-12T11:21:02Z, "Rob" writes: > As far as I understand it, the main requirement of the GPL is that you > make the source available to the same people that use the binaries. So if > your program was never released outside the company, an internal FTP > server hosting the source should be sufficent. That's not even necessary. If you're not distributing it outside the company, then you're not obligated to provide source to people within the company. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser "94 outdated ports on the box, 94 outdated ports. Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done, 82 outdated ports on the box." --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBAAsXr5sRg+Y0CpvERAjlsAKCBdCof7KcaHSaC+GZokMUxeP3sMgCcCGe1 Jv742wQMkvyg9vczYCc7lnQ= =t3qL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 08:11:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1AC16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:11:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C8F43D48 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:10:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 26620 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2004 16:10:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (81.196.25.19) by mail.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 12 Jan 2004 16:10:54 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:12:13 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: , questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040112181213.2002273d@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> In-Reply-To: References: <20040112155034.57fd6a3c@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: cvsup strangeness X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:11:00 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:22:51 -0500 "fbsd_user" wrote: > There was an problem with cvsup and Y2K about number of seconds in > year that caused your problem in the new century. Get both boxes at > the same current version of cvsup-without-gui and they will perform > the same. This is real old history, that why nobody replied to your > original post. But it is the latest: >/home/itetcu/tmp/tmp2# portversion -v 'cvsup*' cvsup-16.1h = up-to-date with port >> On the problem machine (4.7) it was installed cvsup-without-gui; now >> that I've deinstalled and installed cvsup it outputs OK (e.g. >> without >> `,v'), with the same cvsup config file. It seems that the change did not solve the problem, as now I'm getting `,v' agin. > You really need to get your FBSD environment updated > to the current 4.9 stable production release. I will, when I will be convinced vinum and a few custom tricks I've did will not won't break. It is an internal machine. > There is an 5.3 release waiting to be released but it still is to > unreliable. I would not go to any of the 5.x versions as an new file > system is used and there are reports of an file system lockout under > heave loads. Yes, I know, I'm writing from a current box. > Even if they release 5.3 stable, it is not stable yet > and will go through some sub-releases like 4.8 did. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Ion-Mihai > Tetcu > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 8:51 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: cvsup strangeness > > Hi, > > > A while ago I've posted : > > > I have 2 identical (copy/paste) ports-supfiles on two machines: > > > > it# grep -v '#' /etc/ports-supfile > > *default host=cvsup.ro.FreeBSD.org > > *default base=/usr > > *default prefix=/usr > > *default release=cvs tag=. > > *default delete use-rel-suffix > > *default compress > > ports-all > > > > one is produceing : > > Updating collection ports-all/cvs > > Edit ports/audio/abcmidi/Makefile > > Edit ports/audio/abcmidi/distinfo > > ... > > > > The other: > > Updating collection ports-all/cvs > > Edit ports/mail/perdition/pkg-plist > > Edit ports/math/R-letter/Makefile > > SetAttrs ports/math/p5-Statistics-Distributions/Makefile,v > > SetAttrs ports/math/p5-Statistics-Distributions/distinfo,v > > ... > > > > I run it like: > > # cvsup -g /etc/ports-supfile on both machines. > > > > The stupid question: > > why on the second I have the `,v' suffix ? > > On the problem machine (4.7) it was installed cvsup-without-gui; now > that I've deinstalled and installed cvsup it outputs OK (e.g. > without > `,v'), with the same cvsup config file. > > I wonder if: > 1. anyone can reproduce this. > 2. if 1. is it a bug or a feature. > > > -- > IOnut > Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 08:30:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E8016A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:30:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu (GS166.SP.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.205.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 688E543D2F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:30:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dpelleg@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu) Sender: dpelleg@gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu To: Greg Bernard References: From: Dan Pelleg Date: 12 Jan 2004 11:29:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: 'FreeBSD Questions' Subject: Re: Other ways than quotas to limit mail files size ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:30:39 -0000 Greg Bernard writes: > Is there another way to limit the amount of space occupied by mail files on > a per user basis using another method than quotas ? > > I would like to limit the amount of space available for each user's e.mail > so e.mail file size will not go crazy. > > > Thanks for your advices... > I've never tried this, but it should work: set up a vn(4) disk of the right size, and arrange for the user's spool to be on its mountpoint. See vnconfig(8) for setup examples. -- Dan Pelleg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 08:55:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21AE16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:55:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from redix.it (host49-169.pool8172.interbusiness.it [81.72.169.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EC3F943D53 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 08:55:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from roberto@redix.it) Received: (qmail 22267 invoked by uid 72); 12 Jan 2004 16:55:43 -0000 Received: from 192.168.0.77 (SquirrelMail authenticated user roberto) by mail.redix.it with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:55:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <1045.192.168.0.77.1073926543.squirrel@mail.redix.it> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:55:43 +0100 (CET) From: roberto@redix.it To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: #2 - Swapped disks and now stuck in the mountroot> prompt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:55:47 -0000 Date: 12 jan 2004 I've installed FreeBSD 4.9 on a ide0:0 (primary IDE, master hd) then ported the hard disk on a second PC and installed as ide1:0 (secondary IDE, master hd) without update the "/etc/fstab" file. When booting the kernel start probing devices, I see the disk as "ad2" then the kernel halts when trying to mount the root file system with the following message: mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a root mount failed: 6 At the prompt I've tried with "ufs:/dev/ad2s1a", now the right device, but it does not work. The solution is to instruct the kernel with the right device: but ad2s1a seems to be wrong... After several attempts I discover that the kernel must be started with the option "-a": with this flag the device "ufs:/dev/ad2s1a" is accepted by "mountroot> " and the boot proceed. Than I can change the fstab accordingly to make the change permanent. My question are: 1) I've made any mistake ? 2) Without the boot "-a" flag, why the kernel ask me a device and even it is the correct one vfs_conf.c:vfs_mountroot_ask() give me the error code 6? Thanks Roberto From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 09:10:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B9A16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:10:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.bastyr.edu (mail2.bastyr.edu [204.203.216.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D9543D62 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:10:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jtaylor@bastyr.edu) Received: from bastyr.edu ([172.16.1.131]) by mail2.bastyr.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:09:38 -0800 Message-ID: <4002D4D2.3030204@bastyr.edu> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:09:38 -0800 From: Jason Taylor Organization: Bastyr University User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jan 2004 17:09:38.0408 (UTC) FILETIME=[DC4A3680:01C3D92E] Subject: pr 53245 fixed in 5.2R? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:10:05 -0000 Has the fix for this problem been incorporated into 5.2-RC2? I've searched, but haven't found a definitive answer. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=53245 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 10:39:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10DB216A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:39:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from above.proper.com (above.proper.com [208.184.76.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C406E43D5A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:39:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Received: from [10.0.2.2] (adsl-63-202-92-157.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.92.157]) (authenticated bits=0) by above.proper.com (8.12.10/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0CIdiic098863 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:39:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: phoffprop@mail.proper.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <002c01c3d8ed$57300740$0b00000a@stjames.net> References: <002c01c3d8ed$57300740$0b00000a@stjames.net> X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:39:09 -0800 To: "FreeBSD-questions" From: Paul Hoffman Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Subject: Re: How do I add a third ATA controller to 4.8? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:39:48 -0000 At 9:20 AM +0000 1/12/04, Martyn Hill wrote: >Paul > >I notice that the kernel config file you present is using the "old" device >ata lines - is the ATA controller a particularly old model? > >If not, then the LINT kernel config file shows an alternative, viz > >device ata # just one entry for all ata controllers, no need >to reference IRQs etc... >device atadisk # for your IDE disks >device atapicd # for your CD-ROM like devices > >You should comment out the ata0/ata1 lines before adding the above (and >additionally, remove any "device wd*" lines in that section.) > >Then rebuild your kernel. > >Hope that helps. Thanks to all for the effort, but it didn't. The dmesg output still shows only ata0 and ata1. I am starting to believe that the problem lies in the Dell, not in FreeBSD. I'll work around this by attaching the drive to the second IDE controller and later experiment with adding a third controller on the PCI bus. --Paul Hoffman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 10:40:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544E216A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:40:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [66.234.138.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B02043D3F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:40:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [10.1.1.193] (nfw2.codefab.com [66.234.138.66]) by pi.codefab.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0CIdp00054745; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:39:51 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <21321.1073904325@www46.gmx.net> References: <21321.1073904325@www46.gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:39:51 -0500 To: Philip Schulz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.609) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on pi.codefab.com cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT] Configuration file parsing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:40:09 -0000 On Jan 12, 2004, at 5:45 AM, Philip Schulz wrote: > I'm currently working on a program which will be used in a closed > company > environment. The programm is written in C. For this program, I need to > find > a way of parsing a configuration file. I found a library which can do > exactly what I need, it's GLib's lexical scanner [1]. What are your requirements for this configuation file? Something that deals with "classic" Unix config files (ie, along the lines of /etc/rc.conf and the like), with #-style comments and simple key-value assignment should only take a few hours to whip up, if you can't use GLib or other GPL'ed code for your circumstances. If you need something fancier, consider lex and yacc (or flex & bison), but XML property lists are another alternative that might be more flexible. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 10:41:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EFCF16A4CE; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:41:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from outbox.allstream.net (outbox.allstream.net [207.245.244.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F7543D75; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:41:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from epilogue@allstream.net) Received: from localhost (mon-pq61-015.dial.allstream.net [216.123.136.143]) by outbox.allstream.net (Postfix) with SMTP id A6AE3BD21C; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:42:36 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 00:42:31 -0500 From: epilogue@allstream.net To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040112004231.6167888a.epilogue@allstream.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: linuxpluginwrapper + libmap.conf + fbsd4.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:41:21 -0000 hello all, i am trying to build the libmap.conf feature under 4.9 in order to install the linuxpluginwrapper port. hopefully someone here will know what to suggest for the error message i am getting. ---------------------------------------------------- port error msg under vanilla 4.9 ---------------------------------------------------- Please enable libmap.conf(5) feature for rtld(1). 4-stable user: You can get a following patch. http://people.FreeBSD.org/~nork/libmap_4stable.diff Please apply on /usr/src and make install on /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf. ---------------------------------------------------- download the patch and apply ---------------------------------------------------- /usr/src# patch < /foo/libmap_4stable.diff Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: [snip] Patching file libexec/rtld-elf/rtld.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 52. Hunk #2 succeeded at 132. Hunk #3 succeeded at 295. Hunk #4 succeeded at 369. Hunk #5 succeeded at 797. Hunk #6 succeeded at 1444. done ---------------------------------------------------- here is where problem occurs ---------------------------------------------------- /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf# make install install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 -fschg -C -b ld-elf.so.1 /usr/libexec install: ld-elf.so.1: No such file or directory *** Error code 71 ---------------------------------------------------- i have also tried to 'make buildworld' with the patched source, but it fails. however, the failure doesn't seem to be tied directly to the rtld-elf piece (at least from what i can see). any suggestions would be very much appreciated. thanks, epi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 10:44:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4594216A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:44:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [66.234.138.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F13743D3F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:44:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [10.1.1.193] (nfw2.codefab.com [66.234.138.66]) by pi.codefab.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0CIhk00057480; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:43:46 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <410963BE-452F-11D8-A7A0-003065ABFD92@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:43:46 -0500 To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.609) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on pi.codefab.com cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: Re: set env editor global X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:44:05 -0000 On Jan 12, 2004, at 10:37 AM, fbsd_user wrote: > On an new install with only an root account, I want to set the > command line prompt prefix and the default editor for all new users > and also the root account. > > What file do I put the 'set env' commands in to make this happen > globally? Look at /etc/profile and /etc/csh.cshrc. [ Note that root has /bin/sh as it's shell, whereas normal users will be using csh by default. This matters because different shells have different syntax and config file locations. ] -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 11:04:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE30516A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:04:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp5.wanadoo.nl (smtp5.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A5743D1D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:03:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from znerd@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 10.0.0.153 (db-c-1b11d.adsl.wanadoo.nl [81.69.207.29]) by smtp5.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666F37804D; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:02:44 +0100 (CET) From: Ernst de Haan To: David Fleck , questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:03:37 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200401062310.40460.znerd@FreeBSD.org> <20040109074040.P2988@grond.sourballs.org> In-Reply-To: <20040109074040.P2988@grond.sourballs.org> X-Address: Muiderstraat 1, Amsterdam, Netherlands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401122003.38279.znerd@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Problem with amd (automount daemon) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:04:58 -0000 Still haven't completely figured out what the solution is, but I think I know what's happening: - kscd is hanging to the drive, even though there is no audio CD in there - amd fails at the first attempt to read /dev/cd0c and fails on succeeding calls However, even if I reload amd with 'killall -HUP amd' it doesn't show anything below /mnt/cdrom/. Perhaps there is some other file locked? > > I've got a problem with amd. This is the error I get when I access my > > CD-ROM drive at /mnt/cdrom/: [...] > Is amd running, and with what arguments? What does your /etc/amd.conf > file look like? Are portmap and nfsiod running? It has to be running, otherwise I wouldn't get the error messages, I presume.. This is in my /etc/rc.conf: portmap_enable="YES" amd_enable="YES" amd_flags="-a /.amd_mnt -c 3636 -l syslog /host /etc/amd.map" And indeed it's running: $ ps -ax | grep amd 88 ?? Is 0:00.02 amd -p -a /.amd_mnt -c 3636 -l syslog /host /etc/ amd.map > Also, I've found that at least some CD audio playing programs, like ascd, > will hang onto the cd device even when they aren't playing and there's no > audio CD in the tray. If I try to access a data CD after playing an > audio CD, I will get the error you see unless I kill the CD-playing > program. I did that and indeed kscd was hanging on it. I killed it and tried fstat again, and now I get: $ fstat /dev/rcd0c USER CMD PID FD MOUNT INUM MODE SZ|DV R/W NAME Nothing. Yet if I try to access /mnt/cdrom nothing happens. Ernst From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 11:31:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4A116A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:31:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from web14608.mail.yahoo.com (web14608.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.224.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 695C143D3F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:31:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from plageotakes@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040112193158.96101.qmail@web14608.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [68.165.58.138] by web14608.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:31:58 PST Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:31:58 -0800 (PST) From: peter lageotakes To: FreeBSD-questions In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: How do I add a third ATA controller to 4.8? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:31:59 -0000 --- Paul Hoffman wrote: > At 9:20 AM +0000 1/12/04, Martyn Hill wrote: > >Paul > > > >I notice that the kernel config file you present is > using the "old" device > >ata lines - is the ATA controller a particularly > old model? > > > >If not, then the LINT kernel config file shows an > alternative, viz > > > >device ata # just one entry for all > ata controllers, no need > >to reference IRQs etc... > >device atadisk # for your IDE disks > >device atapicd # for your CD-ROM like > devices > > > >You should comment out the ata0/ata1 lines before > adding the above (and > >additionally, remove any "device wd*" lines in that > section.) > > > >Then rebuild your kernel. > > > >Hope that helps. > > Thanks to all for the effort, but it didn't. The > dmesg output still > shows only ata0 and ata1. I am starting to believe > that the problem > lies in the Dell, not in FreeBSD. > > I'll work around this by attaching the drive to the > second IDE > controller and later experiment with adding a third > controller on the > PCI bus. > > --Paul Hoffman > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" There seems to be a PR associated with the ATA controller (PR 54549). http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=54549 I have had a similar problem trying to get FreeBSD (4.9) installed. Unfortunately, I don't remember how I got it installed on the 600sc. However, I do remember one thing: going into /stand/sysinstall will cause the system to lock (panic). Currently its running something else other than FreeBSD :-( Hope this helps, Pete __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 11:36:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CAD16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:36:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from web20724.mail.yahoo.com (web20724.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.226.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A48D943D78 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:36:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from stanwalters2004@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040112193609.6875.qmail@web20724.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [192.77.198.12] by web20724.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:36:09 PST Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 11:36:09 -0800 (PST) From: stan walters To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: mt command index? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:36:20 -0000 Hello all, I've been getting started with backups and have found useful information about dump, tar, and mt in the archives of this list. For my purposes, tar will work better than dump, so I'm trying to run multiple sessions per tape using tar and the "mt fsf x/mt eom" commands to navigate my way around the sessions. My question is: is there a simple way to generate and index or catalog of the sessions on a tape when used in this way? I use "mt eom" and tar my next session, but if I forget to write one down, I'm n-1 backup and I end up overwriting the "forgotten" session, so the ability to catalog first would be very helpful. Any info appreciated. Thanks, Stan --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 12:04:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DBA16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:03:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from lv.raad.tartu.ee (lv.raad.tartu.ee [194.126.106.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B7343D72 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:03:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from toomas.aas@raad.tartu.ee) Received: Message by Barricade lv.raad.tartu.ee with ESMTP id i0CK3fK7018081; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:03:41 +0200 Message-Id: <200401122003.i0CK3fK7018081@lv.raad.tartu.ee> Received: from INFO/SpoolDir by raad.tartu.ee (Mercury 1.48); 12 Jan 04 22:03:42 +0200 Received: from SpoolDir by INFO (Mercury 1.48); 12 Jan 04 22:03:32 +0200 From: "Toomas Aas" Organization: Tartu City Government To: Matt Bjornson Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:03:30 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Priority: normal References: <200401111038.51350.kstewart@owt.com> In-reply-to: cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: aic7xxx/FreeBSD/Linux can't find disk drives X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:04:00 -0000 > Thanks again. I've spent the weekend trying to get this thing going... > I know both scsi hosts are supported by FreeBSD and Linux, there > aren't any IRQ conflicts between the devices.... Are the disks detected by Adaptec BIOS scan during the system bootup? -- Toomas Aas | toomas.aas@raad.tartu.ee | http://www.raad.tartu.ee/~toomas/ * A woman's husband's previous wife is called her 'wife-in-law.' From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 12:10:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF5916A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:10:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from madras.dyndns.org (dsl-137.241.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.241.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8FE743D53 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:10:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ggop@madras.dyndns.org) Received: from madras.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by madras.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0CK9QL9010678; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:09:29 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from ggop@madras.dyndns.org) Received: (from ggop@localhost) by madras.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9/Submit) id i0CK9OxU010677; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:09:24 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:09:21 +1100 From: Gautam Gopalakrishnan To: Alex Zivenko Message-ID: <20040112200921.GA10661@madras.dyndns.org> References: <000601c3d909$60a86e90$0500a8c0@fire> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000601c3d909$60a86e90$0500a8c0@fire> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xmms - problem - how to fix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:10:59 -0000 On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 02:24:30PM +0200, Alex Zivenko wrote: > Hi! > I have some problem with my xmms mm player. When I'm treing to listen some mp3's it gives me aN error, that I don't know how to fix. I have KDE 3.1 if you need this info ^) > So here it is: > bash-2.05b$ xmms > /dev/dsp: Device busy > /dev/dsp: Device busy > /* with OSS driver */ > > ** WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): Device busy > > ** WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): Device busy > > ** WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): Device busy > /dev/dsp: Device busy I have the same error sometimes when I use mpg123 or mplayer. I don't have kde or any sound daemon like arts or esound. fstat does not help too. I just have to wait for sometime for the device to be available again, maybe a minute. Any ideas, welcome Gautam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 12:20:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B3D16A4CE; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:20:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao02.cox.net (lakemtao02.cox.net [68.1.17.243]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF7543D58; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:20:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from A.J.Caines@halplant.com) Received: from mail.halplant.com ([68.100.162.49]) by lakemtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040112202057.QOTI2297.lakemtao02.cox.net@mail.halplant.com>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:20:57 -0500 Received: by mail.halplant.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8D848100; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:20:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:20:56 -0500 From: Andrew J Caines To: epilogue@allstream.net Message-ID: <20040112202056.GC96641@hal9000.halplant.com> Mail-Followup-To: epilogue@allstream.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040112004231.6167888a.epilogue@allstream.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040112004231.6167888a.epilogue@allstream.net> Organization: H.A.L. Plant X-PGP-Fingerprint: C59A 2F74 1139 9432 B457 0B61 DDF2 AA61 67C3 18A1 X-Powered-by: FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE X-URL: http://halplant.com:88/ X-Yahoo-Profile: AJ_Z0 X-ICQ: 283813972 Importance: Normal User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: linuxpluginwrapper + libmap.conf + fbsd4.9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Andrew J Caines List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:21:00 -0000 epi, I reported what I suspect is this problem to the maintainer (nork@freebsd.org) last night. It's working for me, so it should work for you too. > /usr/src# patch < /foo/libmap_4stable.diff Use... # patch -p0 < /foo/libmap_4stable.diff The -p0 made the difference in my case, even though without it the patch appeared to apply correctly. > /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf# make install For good measure, I'd use... # make clean all && sudo make install Please follow up to -ports to report success or failure. -Andrew- -- _______________________________________________________________________ | -Andrew J. Caines- Unix Systems Engineer A.J.Caines@halplant.com | | "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary | | safety deserve neither liberty nor safety" - Benjamin Franklin, 1759 | From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 12:42:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6FE16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:42:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from radicalv.com (secure.radicalv.com [216.118.91.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B33843D5C for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:41:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ecrist@adtechintegrated.com) Received: (qmail 23068 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2004 20:41:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.1.104) (66.41.18.160) by mail.radicalv.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2004 20:41:01 -0000 From: Eric F Crist Organization: AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:40:54 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_hZwAAkBR/YNLqFQ"; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200401121441.05186.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> Subject: Mounting as non-root? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ecrist@adtechintegrated.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:42:00 -0000 --Boundary-02=_hZwAAkBR/YNLqFQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline What is the most secure way to enable mounting of flash drives, cdroms, and= =20 floppies? I've seen solutions that include setting setuid on mount. I wou= ld=20 rather not go this route. Is there any other easy, secure way? =2D-=20 Eric F Crist AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc (612) 998-3588 --Boundary-02=_hZwAAkBR/YNLqFQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAAwZhzdyDbTMRQIYRAkKqAKCCDIea1mKU2p8ZK7gIFAc1IFqY9wCgkqyy HGghOryNZTbmLlQf8+1NdU8= =5Q8Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_hZwAAkBR/YNLqFQ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 12:44:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15F416A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:44:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from lv.raad.tartu.ee (lv.raad.tartu.ee [194.126.106.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A093943D1F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:43:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from toomas.aas@raad.tartu.ee) Received: Message by Barricade lv.raad.tartu.ee with ESMTP id i0CKhWuI018756; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:43:32 +0200 Message-Id: <200401122043.i0CKhWuI018756@lv.raad.tartu.ee> Received: from INFO/SpoolDir by raad.tartu.ee (Mercury 1.48); 12 Jan 04 22:43:32 +0200 Received: from SpoolDir by INFO (Mercury 1.48); 12 Jan 04 22:43:04 +0200 From: "Toomas Aas" Organization: Tartu City Government To: Joe Schmoe Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:43:04 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20040112034023.51078.qmail@web21510.mail.yahoo.com> cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best practices - USB 2.0 PCI card and gigabit ethernet PCI c X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:44:03 -0000 Hi! > I am running freebsd 4.9 and want to add: > > - a USB 2.0 PCI card AFAIK, FreeBSD 4.9 only supports USB 1.0. Depending on what you want to do, there are two options: - upgrade to 5.x, which supports USB 2.0 (but is possibly a bit too "cutting edge") - use FireWire devices instead of USB 2.0. FireWire is supported in FreeBSD 4.9 -- Toomas Aas | toomas.aas@raad.tartu.ee | http://www.raad.tartu.ee/~toomas/ * It's always darkest right before you step on the cat. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 12:53:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD13716A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:53:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from madras.dyndns.org (dsl-137.241.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.241.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1295543D72 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:52:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ggop@madras.dyndns.org) Received: from madras.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by madras.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0CKokL9047458; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:50:48 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from ggop@madras.dyndns.org) Received: (from ggop@localhost) by madras.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9/Submit) id i0CKoiFY047368; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:50:44 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:50:42 +1100 From: Gautam Gopalakrishnan To: Eric F Crist Message-ID: <20040112205042.GA44664@madras.dyndns.org> References: <200401121441.05186.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401121441.05186.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mounting as non-root? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:53:06 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 02:40:54PM -0600, Eric F Crist wrote: Content-Description: signed data > What is the most secure way to enable mounting of flash drives, cdroms, and > floppies? I've seen solutions that include setting setuid on mount. I would > rather not go this route. Is there any other easy, secure way? sudo is the easiest I've seen. I've stopped using su nowadays, for anything Gautam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 13:00:57 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF90316A4D0 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:00:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from radicalv.com (secure.radicalv.com [216.118.91.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29EA643D41 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 12:59:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ecrist@adtechintegrated.com) Received: (qmail 26390 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2004 20:59:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.1.104) (66.41.18.160) by mail.radicalv.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2004 20:59:43 -0000 From: Eric F Crist Organization: AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc To: Gautam Gopalakrishnan Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:59:38 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <200401121441.05186.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> <20040112205042.GA44664@madras.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20040112205042.GA44664@madras.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_DrwAAzixvtw5jVB"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200401121459.47773.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mounting as non-root? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ecrist@adtechintegrated.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:00:57 -0000 --Boundary-02=_DrwAAzixvtw5jVB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 12 January 2004 02:50 pm, Gautam Gopalakrishnan wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 02:40:54PM -0600, Eric F Crist wrote: > Content-Description: signed data > > > What is the most secure way to enable mounting of flash drives, cdroms, > > and floppies? I've seen solutions that include setting setuid on mount= =2E=20 > > I would rather not go this route. Is there any other easy, secure way? > > sudo is the easiest I've seen. I've stopped using su nowadays, for anythi= ng Gautam, I guess I should have specified a little clearer. My desktop users have an= =20 icon on their desktops so they can access the cdrom, usb flash drives, etc.= =20 They need the ability to just right-click an select mount or unmount. I ha= ve=20 temporarily setuid on mount and umount, but this allows these users to moun= t=20 and unmount core filesystems, too. I would like to get away from this. =2D-=20 Eric F Crist AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc (612) 998-3588 --Boundary-02=_DrwAAzixvtw5jVB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAAwrDzdyDbTMRQIYRApvtAJ9nGJu9iMK4YV0whMF491UfDyI5EQCfY6rm RYj/e59mRhwxlZFxt+BEJcE= =H9fs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_DrwAAzixvtw5jVB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 13:05:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6C016A502 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:05:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E494C43D54 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:05:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.103]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20040112210508.NOFV6455.mta11.adelphia.net@barbish>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:05:08 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Charles Swiger" Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:05:08 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: <410963BE-452F-11D8-A7A0-003065ABFD92@mac.com> cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: RE: set env editor global X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:05:39 -0000 I think you are incorrect about root using the sh shell as default. My new fresh install of 4.9 uses csh as the root default shell. I did nothing to make this happen, that's the way the system was installed from the cdrom install disk. I am to only one on this stand-a-lone system and ps ax command shows me as csh. The /etc/csh.cshrc does set the defaults for new users added to the system, but has no effect on root. Had the edit root .cshrc file to set env defaults for root. But thanks for the pointer to /etc/csh.cshrc -----Original Message----- From: Charles Swiger [mailto:cswiger@mac.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 1:44 PM To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG Subject: Re: set env editor global On Jan 12, 2004, at 10:37 AM, fbsd_user wrote: > On an new install with only an root account, I want to set the > command line prompt prefix and the default editor for all new users > and also the root account. > > What file do I put the 'set env' commands in to make this happen > globally? Look at /etc/profile and /etc/csh.cshrc. [ Note that root has /bin/sh as it's shell, whereas normal users will be using csh by default. This matters because different shells have different syntax and config file locations. ] -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 13:05:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA32816A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:05:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from madras.dyndns.org (dsl-137.241.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au [220.240.241.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A03943D66 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:05:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ggop@madras.dyndns.org) Received: from madras.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by madras.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0CL4ML9064337; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:04:22 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from ggop@madras.dyndns.org) Received: (from ggop@localhost) by madras.dyndns.org (8.12.9p1/8.12.9/Submit) id i0CL4LCe064290; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:04:21 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:04:18 +1100 From: Gautam Gopalakrishnan To: Eric F Crist Message-ID: <20040112210418.GA56877@madras.dyndns.org> References: <200401121441.05186.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> <20040112205042.GA44664@madras.dyndns.org> <200401121459.47773.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401121459.47773.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mounting as non-root? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:05:55 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 02:59:38PM -0600, Eric F Crist wrote: Content-Description: signed data > On Monday 12 January 2004 02:50 pm, Gautam Gopalakrishnan wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 02:40:54PM -0600, Eric F Crist wrote: > > Content-Description: signed data > > > > > What is the most secure way to enable mounting of flash drives, cdroms, > > > and floppies? I've seen solutions that include setting setuid on mount. > > > I would rather not go this route. Is there any other easy, secure way? > > > > sudo is the easiest I've seen. I've stopped using su nowadays, for anything > > Gautam, > > I guess I should have specified a little clearer. My desktop users have an > icon on their desktops so they can access the cdrom, usb flash drives, etc. > They need the ability to just right-click an select mount or unmount. I have > temporarily setuid on mount and umount, but this allows these users to mount > and unmount core filesystems, too. I would like to get away from this. My newbie suggestion would be to make mount and umount a shell script which just execs sudo. In sudo, you could specify which users could (un)mount which devices. You would obviously need to rename mount and umount and remember to keep track when you do a buildworld... My 0.02 Gautam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 13:08:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2505D16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:08:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp6.wanadoo.nl (smtp6.wanadoo.nl [194.134.35.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53CF43D8A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:08:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from znerd@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 10.0.0.153 (db-c-1b11d.adsl.wanadoo.nl [81.69.207.29]) by smtp6.wanadoo.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485B3782F6; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:07:58 +0100 (CET) From: Ernst de Haan To: ecrist@adtechintegrated.com, Gautam Gopalakrishnan Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:08:52 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200401121441.05186.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> <20040112205042.GA44664@madras.dyndns.org> <200401121459.47773.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> In-Reply-To: <200401121459.47773.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> X-Address: Muiderstraat 1, Amsterdam, Netherlands MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401122208.52253.znerd@FreeBSD.org> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mounting as non-root? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:08:44 -0000 Eric, Use amd, the auto-mounting daemon. See: http://www.daemonnews.org/200202/automounting.html Let me know how this works for you. I've got some problems with it, probably mainly due to an Audio CD program getting in the way. Ernst On Monday 12 January 2004 20:59, Eric F Crist wrote: > On Monday 12 January 2004 02:50 pm, Gautam Gopalakrishnan wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 02:40:54PM -0600, Eric F Crist wrote: > > Content-Description: signed data > > > > > What is the most secure way to enable mounting of flash drives, > > > cdroms, and floppies? I've seen solutions that include setting > > > setuid on mount. I would rather not go this route. Is there any > > > other easy, secure way? > > > > sudo is the easiest I've seen. I've stopped using su nowadays, for > > anything > > Gautam, > > I guess I should have specified a little clearer. My desktop users have > an icon on their desktops so they can access the cdrom, usb flash drives, > etc. They need the ability to just right-click an select mount or > unmount. I have temporarily setuid on mount and umount, but this allows > these users to mount and unmount core filesystems, too. I would like to > get away from this. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 13:21:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5486A16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:21:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from bsdjunky.homeunix.org (adsl-217-152-13.owb.bellsouth.net [68.217.152.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD8A43D81 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:20:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from b_cassidy@bellsouth.net) Received: from bsdjunky.homeunix.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0CMRVaE017557 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:27:31 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from b_cassidy@bellsouth.net) Received: (from bsdsys@localhost) by bsdjunky.homeunix.org (8.12.8p2/8.12.8/Submit) id i0CMRUI0017556 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:27:30 -0600 (CST) X-Authentication-Warning: bsdjunky.homeunix.org: bsdsys set sender to b_cassidy@bellsouth.net using -f Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:27:30 -0600 From: Bryan Cassidy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040112222730.GA16412@bellsouth.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: b_cassidy@bellsouth.net X-Operating-System: 'uname -a' User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: CUPS Admin Error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bryan Cassidy List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:21:22 -0000 When I launch http://localhost:631/admin after installed and setting up CUPS with these instructions http://www.freebsdforums.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=15325&highlight=cups and I get the following error after entering the following information Request Entity Too Large The request is too large for this server to process.HTTP/1.1 413 Request Entity Too Large Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 05:53:06 GMT Server: CUPS/1.1 Content-Language: en-us,en;q=0.5 Upgrade: TLS/1.0,HTTP/1.1 Connection: close Content-Type: text/html Content-Length: 168 Request Entity Too Large The request is too large for this server to process. I also did the following cd /dev && ./MAKEDEV lpt0 ls -l lpt0 crw------- 1 root wheel 16, 0 Jan 11 19:19 /dev/lpt0 lptcontrol -i -d /dev/lpt0 Any help is appreciated From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 13:32:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F07216A4D0 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:32:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from voronoi.ics.uci.edu (voronoi.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5626543D67 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:32:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cadaver@tucu.net) Received: from [128.195.105.119] (pv105119.reshsg.uci.edu [128.195.105.119]) (authenticated bits=0) by voronoi.ics.uci.edu (8.12.9p1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0CLWMYc044348 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:32:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cadaver@tucu.net) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:32:21 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.609) Subject: Promise Fastrak ATA RAID 1 mirror lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:32:25 -0000 Hi, I have an intel motherboard with an onboard Promise Fastrak ATA RAID. This morning it reported that the mirror was lost and I would like to rebuild it. My system is FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p10. This is what's reported from `atacontrol list`: ATA channel 0: Master: acd0 ATA/ATAPI rev 0 Slave: no device present ATA channel 1: Master: no device present Slave: no device present ATA channel 2: Master: ad4 ATA/ATAPI rev 5 Slave: no device present ATA channel 3: Master: ad6 ATA/ATAPI rev 5 Slave: no device present The kernel message that I saw in my daily report was this: ad6: hard error reading fsbn 140018943 of 0-127 (ad6 bn 140018943; cn 138907 tn 10 sn 57) trying PIO mode ad6: DMA problem fallback to PIO mode ad6: DMA problem fallback to PIO mode ad6: DMA problem fallback to PIO mode ad6: DMA problem fallback to PIO mode ad6: hard error reading fsbn 140019007 of 0-127 (ad6 bn 140019007; cn 138907 tn 11 sn 58) status=59 error=00 ar0: WARNING - mirror lost Which is confirmed by the output of `atacontrol status ar0`: ar0: ATA RAID1 subdisks: ad4 ad6 status: DEGRADED So I looked at the handbook () and in section 12.4.3 it suggests that I detach, attach and then rebuild the array. Can I do this on a running system or do I first need to drop to single user mode? If I do that, how do that without rebooting? Does anyone have any experience with this? The other option seems to be to reboot the computer and use the Fastrak firmware to rebuild the array. Which option is the most painless? I have recent dumps of the system, but I would prefer not to have to go that route. Thanks for any help/suggestions, Michael From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 13:32:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4727816A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:32:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.devrandom.org.uk (82-68-135-38.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.68.135.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE4DA43D39 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:32:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from howells@kde.org) Received: from 0-c-6e-e5-27-1.middleearth (0-c-6e-e5-27-1.middleearth [192.168.1.183]) by mail.devrandom.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A5C133BB for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:32:25 +0000 (GMT) From: Chris Howells Organization: K Desktop Environment To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:31:57 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.94 References: <20040112222730.GA16412@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <20040112222730.GA16412@bellsouth.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200401122131.57799.howells@kde.org> Subject: Re: CUPS Admin Error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:32:27 -0000 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 12 January 2004 22:27, Bryan Cassidy wrote: > and I get the following error after entering the following information > > Request Entity Too Large The request is too large for this server to What version of FreeBSD? Did you install CUPS from packages? The CUPS packa= ge,=20 in 4.7 IIRC, was broken and generated this kind of error. =2D --=20 Cheers, Chris Howells -- chris@chrishowells.co.uk, howells@kde.org Web: http://chrishowells.co.uk, PGP ID: 0x33795A2C KDE/Qt/C++/PHP Developer: http://www.kde.org =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAAxJNF8Iu1zN5WiwRArWiAJ4wy11w74eRXuqjd090fk+Qe3UEEgCgiKXq ISevM7ZTylgW4fu3ClpAE/Q=3D =3DP85/ =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 13:34:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCCC116A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:34:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from m00.ca.astound.net (m00.ca.astound.net [64.85.239.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5DBF43D93 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:33:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rchopra@cal.berkeley.edu) Received: from cal.berkeley.edu (astound-64-85-244-72.ca.astound.net [64.85.244.72]) by m00.ca.astound.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0CLX1KL011495 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:33:01 -0800 Message-ID: <4003126E.5030107@cal.berkeley.edu> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:32:30 -0800 From: Rishi Chopra User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: FreeBSD, SSH and "Enter Authentication Response" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:34:11 -0000 I have a nitpicky question about logging into a FreeBSD machine and SSH. I'm using a minimal FreeBSD install and SSH Secure Shell client v3.2.0 - the crux of the problem is I am unable to "smoothly" login. When I login to my machine, I'm prompted to enter an "authentication response". A window is displayed with "Enter Authentication Response" in the title bar, and two buttons at the bottom ('OK' and 'Cancel') - the text says: Enter your authentication response. Password: If I enter my password, I'm prompted with another window that has the same title in the title bar, but says the following only: Enter your authentication response. I can then either select the 'OK' button or the 'Cancel' button. If I choose cancel for the first dialogue box, I'm prompted with a window that says "Enter Password" in the title bar and the text reading: Password: This is the window I normally see when I login to other *nix servers (mainly servers on the UC Berkeley campus, mostly SunOS 5.8 boxes). Is the FreeBSD box doing something during the SSH authentication process that causes the client not to display the enter password dialogue as soon as I connect to the server? How I can get my server to simply prompt for my password the first time (e.g. can I make a change such that I don't have to press 'OK' on a secod dialogue after entering my password, or so that I don't have to press 'Cancel' first and then enter my password?) Thanks, Rishi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 13:36:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBDF516A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:36:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from etrn2.doruk.net.tr (etrn2.doruk.net.tr [212.58.5.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66F043D69 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:36:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vahric@doruk.net.tr) Received: from mail.doruk.net.tr ([212.58.5.6] helo=doruk.net.tr) by etrn2.doruk.net.tr with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Ag9pU-0001Aq-Vw for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:42:36 +0200 Received: from [82.151.156.1] (account vahric HELO hpvaho) by doruk.net.tr (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 71624756 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:42:49 +0200 From: "Vahric MUHTARYAN" To: Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:36:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Thread-Index: AcPXznDDKCmvjVuUR2Cf9PGlpTE0CgBhalvg Message-ID: Subject: Unsupported Driver at the instalaltion section X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:36:44 -0000 Hi Everybody,=20 Sorry I know this kind of question posted the list but I can't catch it. I'm almost using intel based board and RAID controllers and some = time Promise RAID controller for IDE Disk . I don't have any gripe about = drivers because all of them are foundable by FreeBSD .=20 =DDf hardware vendor have a driver or build new driver for FreeBSD newly Does it possible to introduce this driver to the FreeBSD because I cant find any section on handbook for .=20 Vahric =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 13:44:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33DAC16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:44:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from wekan.com (wekan.com [128.121.116.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56F1F43D6E for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:44:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from danl@solvnet.net) Received: from a (mdsnwi14-vlan453-49.dsl.tds.net [216.170.143.49]) by wekan.com (8.12.10) id i0CLiQ46036439; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:44:26 -0600 (CST) From: danl@solvnet.net To: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:44:03 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4002C0C3.12700.2CEB8F@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <44isk2s3c6.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <3FEC133C.11489.27764D@localhost> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.11) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.9, 5.1 boot failure after install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:44:52 -0000 We finally have mail working again. I heard a number of responses. though none was the actual solution, corporately they massaged one to being. From one guy who installed redhat, to someone using the live disk, to adjusting bootstraps I still couldn't get to the file system, even after installing slackware. Problem is the hologram was writing over the error prompt. It wasn't until I used the raid device format and attempted to install that I got a readable error "not close enough to boundary edge" that I caught on that I probably had a geometry problem. I installed slackware but that didn't work. Out of frustration I installed windows 2000 and successfully replaced it with 4.9. I then tried to replace that with 5.1 and it failed. I then tried to reinstall 4.9 and that failed. I then went back to installing windows 2000 then replacing it with 4.9 and writing the geometry down. On the next attempt to install 5.1 I saw the geometry changed and the install failed. I attempted to reinstall 4.9 and it failed. I again reinstalled 4.9 changing the geometry to what I'd written down and the install was successful. The geometry chosen by windows worked. Now I don't know if it is the best economy (could be windows huge blocks wasting space on small files) but it does work. Here's the rub, this geometry is a lucky guess on 17G drives, what about when I replace them with 50 or 80G drives. How do I figure out the proper geometry? I'd like to setup 5.1 before I commit this box to the network, but it needs a different geometry that I couldn't guess. Is there a requirement standard? A special offset at the start of the disk space? any help much appreciated. Dan To: danl@solvnet.net Copies to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Send reply to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.9, 5.1 boot failure after install From: Lowell Gilbert Date sent: 27 Dec 2003 10:11:21 -0500 > danl@solvnet.net writes: > > > Hello, > > > > I had 4.9 release working and did a clean install of 5.1 release over > > the 4.9 and ended up with boot failure after install. Using allBSD > > partition and standard MBR I get a missing operating system error. If I > > use the FreeBSD boot I just get "default F1" and a beep. Now trying to > > install the 4.9 gives the same results. > > > > I'm using a Mylex DAC960ptl (accelraid 250) with the primary disk > > setup as JBOD. I set the bootable disk as active but everytime I go > > back to config fdisk the flag is not set. > > > > I then upgraded and flashed the RAID card, reformatted the disks and > > tried a 4.9 install, again with the same results. > > > > Is there an issue with the DAC card geometry or BIOS? Or a subtle > > quirk that isn't documented yet? > > Sounds more like you're not using the option to actually write out the > results to disk. (W)rite, maybe? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 14:12:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE7616A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:12:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.seekingfire.com (coyote.seekingfire.com [24.72.10.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7006743D31 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:12:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tillman@seekingfire.com) Received: by mail.seekingfire.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id CB5371B0; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:12:18 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:12:18 -0600 From: Tillman Hodgson To: FreeBSD-Questions Message-ID: <20040112221218.GI66765@seekingfire.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . X-GPG-Key-ID: 828AFC7B X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5584 14BA C9EB 1524 0E68 F543 0F0A 7FBC 828A FC7B X-GPG-Key: http://www.seekingfire.com/gpg_key.asc X-Urban-Legend: There is lots of hidden information in headers Subject: ngctl and rc.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:12:22 -0000 Howdy folks, What's the best way to build ng_one2many interfaces into rc.conf such that they're brought up (live) at the "normal" time so that: 1) configuration remains centralized in rc.conf 2) other pieces that depend on a network being present don't fail in enlightening ways? I want to avoid the "make a shell script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d" approach. -T -- If any man thinks he slays, and if another thinks he is slain, neither knows the ways of truth. The Eternal in man cannot kill: the Eternal in man cannot die. Bhagavad Gita From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 14:13:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 735D516A4D4 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:13:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from tibor.swiftdsl.com.au (tibor.swiftdsl.com.au [202.154.92.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3FA43D2D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:13:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from deviledog@swiftdsl.com.au) Received: (qmail 32587 invoked by uid 33); 12 Jan 2004 22:18:13 -0000 Received: from 61.88.6.90 (SquirrelMail authenticated user deviledog) by webmail.swiftdsl.com.au with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:18:13 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <8991.61.88.6.90.1073945893.squirrel@webmail.swiftdsl.com.au> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:18:13 +1100 (EST) From: "August Simonelli" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: /etc/rc.conf vs /etc/defaults/rc.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:13:31 -0000 Hi all, I've looked in the handbook (and probably missed the explanation) but am still a little confused. What's the difference between these two rc.conf files? Both affect things, but what is best practice for their use? Thank in advance, August PS I'm using 4.9 and realize some things may be differnet in 5.x ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 14:17:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF60416A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:17:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from eternal.slumber.org (eternal.slumber.org [68.98.216.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF3943D31 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:17:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from flagg@eternal.slumber.org) Received: from eternal.slumber.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) ESMTP id i0CMBTV8026037 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:11:29 -0700 Received: (from flagg@localhost)i0CMBT7w026035 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:11:29 -0700 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:11:29 -0700 From: Shawn Ostapuk To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040112221129.GA25549@slumber.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Subject: vinum / 5.2 cant mount/growfs/newfs terabyte X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:17:50 -0000 Well its been quite a few months, and FreeBSD 5.2 got released today so I quickly went to see if my problem has been fixed yet, specially since the release notes were quite hopeful: "The sizes of some members of the statfs structure have changed from 32 bits to 64 bits in order to better support multi-terabyte filesystems." I was hoping that was the fix...but it wasnt... And now my problem... I use vinum and a number of IDE drives on two boxes, primary server and backup. Around 5 or 6 months ago the size grew to be needing a terabyte or more -- so I did the usual and added a new drive to the vinum configuration, went to growfs (which has saved me more time than you can imagine, thanks freebsd) and no luck, newfs, no luck, mount the old one without modifying? no luck...it just breaks after making it larger than 1 tb. I've tried this one two boxes, various drives configs. I can rearranage them all i want and they all work fine, but the second i make it larger than 1 terabyte, everything fails on it. bash-2.05b# vinum list 9 drives: D vinumdrive1 State: up /dev/ad1s1e A: 0/156327 MB (0%) D vinumdrive2 State: up /dev/ad2s1e A: 0/76316 MB (0%) D vinumdrive3 State: up /dev/ad4s1e A: 0/117239 MB (0%) D vinumdrive4 State: up /dev/ad5s1e A: 0/114470 MB (0%) D vinumdrive5 State: up /dev/ad6s1e A: 0/76292 MB (0%) D vinumdrive6 State: up /dev/ad7s1e A: 0/76292 MB (0%) D vinumdrive7 State: up /dev/ad8s1e A: 0/156327 MB (0%) D vinumdrive8 State: up /dev/ad9s1e A: 0/78159 MB (0%) D vinumdrive9 State: up /dev/ad11s1e A: 0/286102 MB (0%) 1 volumes: V pr0n State: up Plexes: 1 Size: 1110 GB 1 plexes: P vinum0.p0 C State: up Subdisks: 9 Size: 1110 GB 9 subdisks: S vinum0.p0.s1 State: up D: vinumdrive1 Size: 152 GB S vinum0.p0.s2 State: up D: vinumdrive2 Size: 74 GB S vinum0.p0.s3 State: up D: vinumdrive3 Size: 114 GB S vinum0.p0.s4 State: up D: vinumdrive4 Size: 111 GB S vinum0.p0.s5 State: up D: vinumdrive5 Size: 74 GB S vinum0.p0.s6 State: up D: vinumdrive6 Size: 74 GB S vinum0.p0.s7 State: up D: vinumdrive7 Size: 152 GB S vinum0.p0.s8 State: up D: vinumdrive8 Size: 76 GB S vinum0.p0.s9 State: up D: vinumdrive9 Size: 279 GB (no its not really porn stupid name i madeup too long ago to change =) All the drives work. In fact i've used two vinum configs at the same time using all the drives because of this terabyte limit :( Now with the above setup, vinum thinks everything is fine and looks fine as far as I can tell. And i've heard of vinum being used in greater than 1tb situations making me think there is no problem with it. But the second i try to do anything... bash-2.05b# mount /dev/vinum/pr0n mount: /dev/vinum/pr0n: unknown special file or file system ---- bash-2.05b# growfs /dev/vinum/pr0n growfs: rdfs: read error: 128: Invalid argument ---- bash-2.05b# newfs /dev/vinum/pr0n /dev/vinum/pr0n: 1137530.4MB (2329662200 sectors) block size 16384, fragment size 2048 using 6191 cylinder groups of 183.77MB, 11761 blks, 23552 inodes. newfs: can't read old UFS1 superblock: read error from block device: Invalid argument ---- No, it is NOT using ufs1, it is ufs2 -- in fact that code it hits in newfs only comes up when dealing with ufs2 partitions. The second i remove any drives that make it past the 1TB barrior i can mount/newfs it again no problems. Again, in any order and any drives on two different machines with a whole new set of drives. So thoughts anyone? is no one else in the world using vinum to concat some IDE drives past 1tb? i've heard of mount correctly mounting ufs2 partitions off hardware raids that are larger than 1tb no problem... it just seems to be some sort of problem with the two together...i'll be enternally grateful for anyone who can help me past this barrior, it is getting more and more difficult to work around separate partitions, etc -- and i see this becoming more and more common now that 300 gig drives are $299 retail... Thanks, Shawn. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 14:31:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB75716A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:31:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta07-svc.ntlworld.com (mta07-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA62543D2F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:31:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scott@fishballoon.org) Received: from llama.fishballoon.org ([81.104.195.124]) by mta07-svc.ntlworld.comESMTP <20040112223122.NOBS2588.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@llama.fishballoon.org>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:31:22 +0000 Received: from tuatara.fishballoon.org ([192.168.1.6]) by llama.fishballoon.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD) id 1AgAZm-000EeW-Cx; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:30:26 +0000 Received: (from scott@localhost) by tuatara.fishballoon.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0CMUO3S035364; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:30:24 GMT (envelope-from scott) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:30:24 +0000 From: Scott Mitchell To: August Simonelli Message-ID: <20040112223024.GB444@tuatara.fishballoon.org> References: <8991.61.88.6.90.1073945893.squirrel@webmail.swiftdsl.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8991.61.88.6.90.1073945893.squirrel@webmail.swiftdsl.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE i386 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc/rc.conf vs /etc/defaults/rc.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:31:25 -0000 On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:18:13AM +1100, August Simonelli wrote: > Hi all, > > I've looked in the handbook (and probably missed the explanation) but am > still a little confused. What's the difference between these two rc.conf > files? Both affect things, but what is best practice for their use? > > Thank in advance, Hi, /etc/defaults/rc.conf sets the default values for all of the configuration options - the values that will be used if you don't change anything. You shouldn't ever need to modify this file, or anything else in /etc/defaults for that matter. /etc/rc.conf is where you put local changes to the defaults - things that are specific to your system or network. At the very least, you will probably want to set the name of your machine and configure whatever network interfaces you have in here. The installer may have already written some settings to /etc/rc.conf when you were first setting up FreeBSD on the machine. So my general rule is to only ever edit /etc/rc.conf, and to just put changes to the default settings in it. Some people will copy the whole /etc/defaults/rc.conf to /etc/rc.conf and then make whatever changes they require - you get to see everything together in one file this way, but the danger is that you drift further and further away from the default configuration as upgrades change things in /etc/defaults/rc.conf, without you noticing. Hope that helps, Scott -- =========================================================================== Scott Mitchell | PGP Key ID | "Eagles may soar, but weasels Cambridge, England | 0x54B171B9 | don't get sucked into jet engines" scott at fishballoon.org | 0xAA775B8B | -- Anon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 14:31:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A7316A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:31:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49CB43D5D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:31:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.103]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20040112223146.POUV6455.mta11.adelphia.net@barbish>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:31:46 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "August Simonelli" , Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:31:45 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: <8991.61.88.6.90.1073945893.squirrel@webmail.swiftdsl.com.au> Subject: RE: /etc/rc.conf vs /etc/defaults/rc.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:31:55 -0000 It's all explained in the comments at the top of /etc/rc.conf -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of August Simonelli Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 5:18 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: /etc/rc.conf vs /etc/defaults/rc.conf Hi all, I've looked in the handbook (and probably missed the explanation) but am still a little confused. What's the difference between these two rc.conf files? Both affect things, but what is best practice for their use? Thank in advance, August PS I'm using 4.9 and realize some things may be differnet in 5.x ... _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 14:43:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE90B16A4DC for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:43:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A26443D4C for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:43:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from barner@in.tum.de) Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2E0E892B6; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:43:06 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:43:05 +0100 From: Simon Barner To: Eric F Crist Message-ID: <20040112224305.GA687@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <200401121441.05186.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gKMricLos+KVdGMg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401121441.05186.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mounting as non-root? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:43:09 -0000 --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, > What is the most secure way to enable mounting of flash drives, cdroms, a= nd=20 > floppies? I've seen solutions that include setting setuid on mount. I w= ould=20 > rather not go this route. Is there any other easy, secure way? You can allow mounting for ordinary users with the following sysctl(8): vfs.usermount With Gnome 2.5 (probably also with 2.4, but I need to run the development version in order to help with some ports) users can mount cdroms and floppies on mount points in their home directories (~/cdrom and ~/floppies). Unfortunately, you will need appropriate entries into /etc/fstab for every user. Simon --gKMricLos+KVdGMg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAAyL5Ckn+/eutqCoRAjH4AJ0cmU+gIbqQh7IhxJjDvn3WEz1Z8ACfXi/K pm9Z37946VQgevyoslO4CI8= =LQBM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gKMricLos+KVdGMg-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 14:48:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36F416A4CE; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:48:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DE243D4C; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:48:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C919172DC9; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:48:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB2F72DC7; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:48:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:48:30 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White To: Kevin Berrien In-Reply-To: <1523970523.1062.6.camel@linuxppc> Message-ID: <20040112144706.A54897@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <1523970523.1062.6.camel@linuxppc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Install bug - 4.9 stable - post install circular reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:48:31 -0000 On Tue, 17 Apr 2018, Kevin Berrien wrote: > I can confirm an issue posted Dec 3rd, freebsd-stable maillist, titled > "4.9 install buglet". > > I experience this bug running the install (various configurations) 100% > of the time. After install, after system reboot, the boot loader comes > up with F1: FreeBSD, and reboots continually forever. To test, I made 3 > installs without issue using 4.8. So first, I'd like to confirm the bug > report, and ask the following. Please qualify "reboots continutally forever." It reboots after printing the F1: FreeBSD message, or after you press a key, or what? This sounds like a BIOS issue. boot0 uses only BIOS calls to do its work. Lots of problems like this are also caused by bad drive geometry. What is the partition layout on the disk(s) in the system? Hardware description? -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:04:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9E316A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:04:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.cult.cu (ns2.cubarte.org [169.158.120.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B5FE43D39 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:04:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from admin@atenas.cult.cu) Received: from [169.158.120.178] (helo=mail.atenas.cult.cu) by mail.cult.cu with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AgBBu-000JLb-27 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:09:50 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.9] (helo=bloodlust) by mail.atenas.cult.cu with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1) id 1AgB0F-0000EU-00 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:57:47 -0500 Message-ID: <001601c3d960$696a5550$0901a8c0@bloodlust> From: "Xpression" To: "FreeBSD-questions" Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:04:20 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Subject: Script question... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:04:38 -0000 Hi list, I've making a script to write the content of three text files to one file, but I want to separate each files by a delimiter like the name of the file. This is the script: #! /bin/sh path=/some/dir if !([ -f $path/this.one ]); then for file in $path/file1 $path/file2 $path/file3; do cat $file >> $path/this.one done fi exit 0 By now the output is: Contents of file1 Contents of file2 Contents of file3 And I want to be like this: ----------------------------------------------------------------------- file1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Contents of file1 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- file2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Contents of file2 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- file3 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Contents of file3 any suggestion ??? Thanks... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:24:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9220E16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:24:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.thilelli.net (juliengabel.net1.nerim.net [62.212.119.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6789E43D2F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:24:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jpeg@thilelli.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.thilelli.net [127.0.0.1]) by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66662241B0 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:24:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from bento.thilelli.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bento.thilelli.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 97839-02 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:24:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail.thilelli.net (localhost.thilelli.net [127.0.0.1]) by bento.thilelli.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 65FE4241A5 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:24:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from 192.168.0.97 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jgabel) by webmail.thilelli.net with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:24:10 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <50121.192.168.0.97.1073949850.squirrel@webmail.thilelli.net> In-Reply-To: <001601c3d960$696a5550$0901a8c0@bloodlust> References: <001601c3d960$696a5550$0901a8c0@bloodlust> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:24:10 +0100 (CET) From: "Julien Gabel" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at thilelli.net Subject: Re: Script question... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:24:16 -0000 > Hi list, I've making a script to write the content of three text files > to one file, but I want to separate each files by a delimiter like the > name of the file. Maybe this little sh(1) script can do the job: # ========================= begin.script ========================= #! /bin/sh path=~/tmp files="file1 file2 file3" output_file=this.one cd ${path} && [ ! -f ${output_file} ] && \ for file in ${files} do echo ---------------------------------------- >> ${output_file} echo ${file} >> ${final_file} echo ---------------------------------------- >> ${output_file} cat ${file} >> ${final_file} done echo ---------------------------------------- >> ${output_file} exit 0 # ========================= end.script ========================= -- -jpeg. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:28:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B7516A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:28:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net (stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD38943D5F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:28:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 22-15.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.22.15] helo=yoda.datawok.com) by stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AgBTj-0006x2-00; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:28:15 -0800 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: "Xpression" , "FreeBSD-questions" Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:28:15 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <001601c3d960$696a5550$0901a8c0@bloodlust> In-Reply-To: <001601c3d960$696a5550$0901a8c0@bloodlust> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401121728.15261.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b0f044741a15cda54320cca5e7fc1d513350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Subject: Re: Script question... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:28:26 -0000 On Monday 12 January 2004 05:04 pm, Xpression wrote: > Hi list, I've making a script to write the content of three text files to > one file, but I want to separate each files by a delimiter like the name of > the file. > > This is the script: > > #! /bin/sh > path=/some/dir > if !([ -f $path/this.one ]); then > for file in $path/file1 $path/file2 $path/file3; do > cat $file >> $path/this.one > done > fi > > exit 0 > > By now the output is: > > Contents of file1 > Contents of file2 > Contents of file3 > > And I want to be like this: > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > file1 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Contents of file1 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > file2 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Contents of file2 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > file3 > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Contents of file3 > > any suggestion ??? Thanks... I haven't tested it; but would this work: #! /bin/sh path=/some/dir if !([ -f $path/this.one ]); then for file in $path/file1 $path/file2 $path/file3; do echo '---------' >> $path/this.one echo $file >> $path/this.one cat $file >> $path/this.one done fi exit 0 Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:34:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEF416A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:34:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [66.234.138.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1100C43D46 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:34:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from [10.1.1.193] (nfw2.codefab.com [66.234.138.66]) by pi.codefab.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0CNWP00035345; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:32:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <001601c3d960$696a5550$0901a8c0@bloodlust> References: <001601c3d960$696a5550$0901a8c0@bloodlust> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <94134190-4557-11D8-A7A0-003065ABFD92@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:32:25 -0500 To: Xpression X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.609) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on pi.codefab.com cc: FreeBSD-questions Subject: Re: Script question... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:34:27 -0000 On Jan 12, 2004, at 6:04 PM, Xpression wrote: [ ...a question on how to change a shell script... ] Try: #! /bin/sh path=/some/dir if !([ -f $path/this.one ]); then touch $path/this.one for file in $path/file1 $path/file2 $path/file3; do echo "-----------------------------------------" >> $path/this.one echo " $file" >> $path/this.one echo "-----------------------------------------" >> $path/this.one cat $file >> $path/this.one done fi Also note that using a local variable named $path is not a good idea, since $PATH is highly important. :-) $path and $PATH are seperate in /bin/sh, but many other shells automangle the colon-seperated $PATH into the word-list format used by $path, and vice-versa. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:51:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FF4516A4CE; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:51:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EECB43D96; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:51:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kblists@comcast.net) Received: from 204.127.205.147 ([204.127.205.147]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with SMTP id <2004011223510601600fjv72e>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:51:06 +0000 Received: from [66.31.245.154] by 204.127.205.147; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:51:06 +0000 From: kblists@comcast.net To: ian j hart Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:51:06 +0000 Message-Id: <011220042351.14466.5dc@comcast.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Oct 27 2003) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2JsaXN0c0Bjb21jYXN0Lm5ldA== cc: freebsd.stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Install bug - 4.9 stable - post install circular reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:51:52 -0000 Thanks to Stuart Barkley detailed suggestion: >(From memory, YMMV) Reboot for the installation CD into sysinstall. >Select "Configure" then "Fdisk". In fdisk select "W" this will cause >the MBR to be rewritten correctly (I always select the FreeBSD boot >manager, I don't know if that is necessary). I was able to get my 4.9 to boot. Ian, > That's three of us now. Maybe this should go in the errata? Obsolutely. As I said in my original posting. I'm re-evaluating BSD for the 2nd time, and I was inches away ending my evaluation with the concensus that BSD is not worth my time in 2004. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:51:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA2816A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:51:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3.sentex.ca (smtp3.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1041B43D41 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:51:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smtp2.sentex.ca (smtp2c.sentex.ca [64.7.153.30]) by smtp3.sentex.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0CNpbU7065166; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:51:37 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from BLUELAPIS.sentex.ca (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) by smtp2.sentex.ca (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i0CNpeJh023585; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:51:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) From: Mike Tancsa To: kurilov@tscp.ru Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:51:41 -0500 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vlan support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:51:56 -0000 On 12 Jan 2004 09:33:32 +0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you wrote: >How do you do! >ifconfig_vlan2=3D"inet 192.168.100.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 4 = vlandev >rl0" > >Catalyst settings were write because it works with cisco router. > I am pretty sure the Realtek Driver does not support the larger packet size to handle 802.1q frames. See man vlan. I have used dc and fxp based cards with great results, but nothing on the realtek. ---Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:51:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD72316A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:51:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ghostsearchers.com (host217-42-156-220.range217-42.btcentralplus.com [217.42.156.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9431E43D95 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:51:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from teilhk@hotpost.co.uk) Received: from ARLETTE ([200.67.187.13]) by ghostsearchers.com (ghostsearchers [217.42.156.220]) (MDaemon.PRO.v6.8.4.R) with ESMTP id 17-md50000000009.tmp for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:54:33 +0000 Message-ID: <032601c3d966$ea82d440$210110ac@ARLETTE> From: "Teilhard Knight" To: "FreeBSD" Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:50:45 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Spam-Processed: ghostsearchers, Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:54:33 +0000 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 200.67.187.13 X-Return-Path: teilhk@hotpost.co.uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Partitioning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:51:56 -0000 I am trying to install FreeBSD 5.1. I have created by means other than the installation program, a partitioning of my disk (160 Gig), and I want to install on one of those partitions. I have three primary partitions and one extended where I have installed Linux in one logical partition. I want FreeBSD to go in another logical partition. When I installed 4.7 in another computer, I had no problems whatsoever. But with 5.1 the partitioning utility only sees the primary partitions, the first three and the extended one as a whole. It sees the extended partition as one partition without the logical ones created there. Apparently I must have the partition for FreeBSD as FAT, but other tools do not help me because the partition is too large to be FAT. Any help to solve this will be appreciated. Teilhard. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:55:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16B4F16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:55:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from radicalv.com (secure.radicalv.com [216.118.91.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9AFB43D53 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:55:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from theologicka@secure-computing.net) Received: (qmail 59721 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2004 23:55:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.0.2) (65.25.221.200) by mail.radicalv.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2004 23:55:33 -0000 From: Nathan Alan Souer To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:56:32 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401121756.32839.theologicka@secure-computing.net> Subject: test X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:55:43 -0000 test From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:57:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497EB16A514; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:57:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC2E43D53; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:57:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kblists@comcast.net) Received: from 204.127.205.144 ([204.127.205.144]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP id <2004011223570901100lbtp5e>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:57:09 +0000 Received: from [66.31.245.154] by 204.127.205.144; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:57:08 +0000 From: kblists@comcast.net To: Doug White Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:57:08 +0000 Message-Id: <011220042357.24178.847@comcast.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Oct 27 2003) X-Authenticated-Sender: a2JsaXN0c0Bjb21jYXN0Lm5ldA== cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Install bug - 4.9 stable - post install circular reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:57:14 -0000 I've fixed the problem, but for the benefit of others... > Please qualify "reboots continutally forever." It reboots after printing > the F1: FreeBSD message, or after you press a key, or what? Yes, hitting a key. I would suppose if I let it time out it'd do the same. > This sounds like a BIOS issue. boot0 uses only BIOS calls to do its work. > Lots of problems like this are also caused by bad drive geometry. 4.8 installs correctly 100%, 4.9 fails 100%. > What is the partition layout on the disk(s) in the system? Hardware > description? One of my old test boxes, on which I've install most everything in the past. Single partition, Micron/Intel mb, PII 300, SIS graphics, 4 gig ide, 256 ram. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:59:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7067516A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:59:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from radicalv.com (secure.radicalv.com [216.118.91.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5635043D78 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:58:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from theologicka@secure-computing.net) Received: (qmail 60327 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2004 23:58:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.0.2) (65.25.221.200) by mail.radicalv.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2004 23:58:48 -0000 From: Nathan Alan Souer To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:59:50 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-00=_2TzAAx/oAYHOCOQ" Message-Id: <200401121759.50691.theologicka@secure-computing.net> Subject: Flash and Mozilla X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:59:23 -0000 --Boundary-00=_2TzAAx/oAYHOCOQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --Boundary-00=_2TzAAx/oAYHOCOQ Content-Type: message/rfc822; name="forwarded message" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="forwarded message" Return-Path: Delivered-To: ecrist@Q Received: (qmail 59217 invoked by uid 399); 12 Jan 2004 23:52:44 -0000 Delivered-To: secure-computing.net-ecrist@secure-computing.net Received: (qmail 59209 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2004 23:52:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.0.2) (65.25.221.200) by mail.radicalv.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2004 23:52:44 -0000 From: Nathan Alan Souer To: ecrist@secure-computing.net Subject: Mozilla Flash Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:53:46 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401121751.03668.theologicka@secure-computing.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Status: R X-Status: N X-KMail-EncryptionState: X-KMail-SignatureState: Hello All, I am new to UNIX. I am running FreeBSD 5.1 and KDE 3.1. I've installed both Mozilla and "flashplugin-mozilla" through ports, but whever I try and access a flash page Mozilla freezes so badly that I cannot even close it. I've checked the web and the plug-in documentation, and have had very little success finding any info, could someone point me in the right direction for info or even more diect help please? Thanks, Nate --Boundary-00=_2TzAAx/oAYHOCOQ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 15:59:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D5F16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:59:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.aspadmin.com (smtp.aspadmin.com [216.98.128.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD5E43D41 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:59:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jwilliams@courtesymortgage.com) Received: from jwilliams.courtesymortgage.com (unknown [209.126.131.11]) by smtp.aspadmin.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4F92164F5 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:59:36 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <5.2.1.1.0.20040112155511.00aab178@pop.courtesymortgage.com> X-Sender: jwilliams@pop.courtesymortgage.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.1 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:59:18 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jason Williams Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Cyrus-imapd2 installed through ports question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:59:55 -0000 Hello everyone. I was having a problem after I installed cyrus-imapd2 through the ports tree. Everything on the installation went well. However, im seeing a error pop up in my log that I cannot figure out. Thus, I thought i'd ask here, see if anyone had any similiar problems. Note, this is on a FreeBSD 4.9 box: Cyrus-imapd-2.1.16 Cyrus-sasl-2.1.17 BerkeleyDB-4.1.25 This is from my /var/log/auth.log >Jan 5 23:54:39 obsidianbox imapd[8015]: OTP unavailable because can't >read/write key database /etc/opiekeys: Permission denied >Jan 5 23:54:43 obsidianbox imapd[8015]: no user in db The first one I figured out a workaround. Simple enough. The second one though, is really driving me up a wall. I'm completely baffled as to why this is showing up my logs. What is very odd, is that I can still connect and authenticate from a mail client. I also get it when I use 'imtest' for basic testing of the server. Lastly, I even get it when I connect to the 'cyradm' interface when I want to manage mailboxes. Yet, I can still login and things work. I've tried a variety of things and nothing seems to be working. Here is what I just did: Did a fresh install of FreeBSD 4.9. CVSup the ports and source tree. Navigated to /usr/ports/mail/cyrus-imapd2 port make -DWITH_BDB_VER=41 -DWITH_SKIPLIST_MBOX -DWITH_SKIPLIST_SEEN -DWITH_MURDER As I type this email, im wondering if it could have been something I did: 1.) I actually edited the Makefile and changed the BDB_VER line from 3 to 41. Looking on my command line option, I specified 41, but I did it with -DWITH. Not sure if that would cause any problems. Anyone have any ideas on why im getting the "no user in db" entry in my log? I'm at a loss here. Thanks Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 16:04:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A986016A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:04:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from www6.web2010.com (www6.web2010.com [216.157.5.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB2143D54 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:04:07 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from MLandman@face2interface.com) Received: from delliver.face2interface.com (dialup-wash-129-203.thebiz.net [64.30.129.203] (may be forged)) by www6.web2010.com (8.12.10/8.9.0) with ESMTP id i0D03oxL011467; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:03:51 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.0.20040112190349.12200f98@pop.face2interface.com> X-Sender: face@pop.face2interface.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:04:00 -0500 To: Nathan Alan Souer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Marty Landman In-Reply-To: <200401121756.32839.theologicka@secure-computing.net> References: <200401121756.32839.theologicka@secure-computing.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: Re: test X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:04:08 -0000 At 06:56 PM 1/12/2004, Nathan Alan Souer wrote: >test did we pass? Marty Landman Face 2 Interface Inc 845-679-9387 Sign On Required: Web membership software for your site Make a Website: http://face2interface.com/Home/Demo.shtml From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 16:09:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E186616A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:09:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from radicalv.com (secure.radicalv.com [216.118.91.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E278043D55 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:09:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ecrist@adtechintegrated.com) Received: (qmail 62299 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2004 00:09:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 192.168.1.104) (66.41.18.160) by mail.radicalv.com with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 00:09:29 -0000 From: Eric F Crist Organization: AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc To: Marty Landman , Nathan Alan Souer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:09:20 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <200401121756.32839.theologicka@secure-computing.net> <6.0.0.22.0.20040112190349.12200f98@pop.face2interface.com> In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20040112190349.12200f98@pop.face2interface.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_5czAAMGb4uVDXeY"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200401121809.29634.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> Subject: Re: test X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ecrist@adtechintegrated.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:09:42 -0000 --Boundary-02=_5czAAMGb4uVDXeY Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 12 January 2004 06:04 pm, Marty Landman wrote: > At 06:56 PM 1/12/2004, Nathan Alan Souer wrote: > >test > > did we pass? > Sorry, folks. This is my friend and I will make certain Nate gets a good,= =20 solid beating. =2D-=20 Eric F Crist AdTech Integrated Systems, Inc (612) 998-3588 --Boundary-02=_5czAAMGb4uVDXeY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAAzc5zdyDbTMRQIYRAmYgAJwKmKKjADx0dXp/m3nbW99LEOOFfwCgn7mP QEb+tp933LIHcwpDtxZSUA8= =xv8O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_5czAAMGb4uVDXeY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 16:33:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D689216A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:33:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from amex.kq.no (amex.kq.no [193.71.71.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577DA43D2F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:33:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from heine@mittlille.net) Received: by amex.kq.no (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 58866543ED; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:33:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.eunet.no (smtp.eunet.no [193.71.71.243]) by amex.kq.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2A654176 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:33:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from teddy.mittlille.net (unknown [217.8.138.132]) by smtp.eunet.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F6BC54C3 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:33:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:32:22 +0100 To: FreeBSD References: <032601c3d966$ea82d440$210110ac@ARLETTE> Message-ID: From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Heine_Aarb=F8?= Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <032601c3d966$ea82d440$210110ac@ARLETTE> User-Agent: Opera7.23/FreeBSD M2 build 518 Subject: Re: Partitioning X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:33:44 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:50:45 -0600, Teilhard Knight wrote: > I am trying to install FreeBSD 5.1. I have created by means other than > the > installation program, a partitioning of my disk (160 Gig), and I want to > install on one of those partitions. I have three primary partitions and > one > extended where I have installed Linux in one logical partition. I want > FreeBSD to go in another logical partition. When I installed 4.7 in > another > computer, I had no problems whatsoever. But with 5.1 the partitioning > utility only sees the primary partitions, the first three and the > extended > one as a whole. It sees the extended partition as one partition without > the > logical ones created there. Apparently I must have the partition for > FreeBSD > as FAT, but other tools do not help me because the partition is too > large to > be FAT. For some reason the max size of a FAT partition on FreeBSD is limited to 137Gig. If you want a dualboot linux/FreeBSD (and windows) and have a shared area for all of them I would recomend you to make gaps for the OS you chose to install last (abaut 10 gig is suitable for most OS'es) and make a comon FAT partition on the end of the disk for archive(fat) -- Heine Aarbø heine@mittlille.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 16:33:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48EE416A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:33:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-in.m-online.net (svr8.m-online.net [62.245.150.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13DF743D2F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:33:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from h@schmalzbauer.de) Received: from mail.m-online.net (svr14.m-online.net [192.168.3.144]) by svr8.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0298ADA5; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:33:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from cale.flintsbach.schmalzbauer.de (ppp-82-135-4-225.mnet-online.de [82.135.4.225]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776A834ECE; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:33:46 +0100 (CET) From: Harald Schmalzbauer To: Michael , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:33:41 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: X-Birthday: 06 Oktober 1972 X-Name: Harald Schmalzbauer X-Phone1: +49 (0) 163 555 3237 X-Phone2: +49 (0) 89 18947781 X-Address: Munich, 80686 X-Country: Germany MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_qzzAAd9UyhSTZen"; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200401130133.46064@harrymail> Subject: Re: Promise Fastrak ATA RAID 1 mirror lost X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:33:50 -0000 --Boundary-02=_qzzAAd9UyhSTZen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 12 January 2004 22:32, Michael wrote: > Hi, > > I have an intel motherboard with an onboard Promise Fastrak ATA RAID. > This morning it reported that the mirror was lost and I would like to > rebuild it. > > My system is FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE-p10. This is what's reported from > `atacontrol list`: > ATA channel 0: > Master: acd0 ATA/ATAPI rev 0 > Slave: no device present > ATA channel 1: > Master: no device present > Slave: no device present > ATA channel 2: > Master: ad4 ATA/ATAPI rev 5 > Slave: no device present > ATA channel 3: > Master: ad6 ATA/ATAPI rev 5 > Slave: no device present > > The kernel message that I saw in my daily report was this: > ad6: hard error reading fsbn 140018943 of 0-127 (ad6 bn 140018943; cn > 138907 tn > 10 sn 57) trying PIO mode > ad6: DMA problem fallback to PIO mode > ad6: DMA problem fallback to PIO mode > ad6: DMA problem fallback to PIO mode > ad6: DMA problem fallback to PIO mode > ad6: hard error reading fsbn 140019007 of 0-127 (ad6 bn 140019007; cn > 138907 tn > 11 sn 58) status=3D59 error=3D00 > ar0: WARNING - mirror lost > > Which is confirmed by the output of `atacontrol status ar0`: > ar0: ATA RAID1 subdisks: ad4 ad6 status: DEGRADED > > So I looked at the handbook > () > and in section 12.4.3 it suggests that I detach, attach and then > rebuild the array. Can I do this on a running system or do I first need > to drop to single user mode? If I do that, how do that without > rebooting? Does anyone have any experience with this? Like you found in the handbook, atacontrol is what you need and yes, you ca= n=20 do it without rebooting or droping into singleuser (if the drive hadn't=20 really failed but only had a "bad day" like trash on the bus which I=20 regularly have) > > The other option seems to be to reboot the computer and use the Fastrak > firmware to rebuild the array. Last time I tried that it didn't work for SIL0680 nor HPT372, but I don't k= now=20 about the promise. Give the handbook procedure a try! =2DHarry > > Which option is the most painless? I have recent dumps of the system, > but I would prefer not to have to go that route. > > Thanks for any help/suggestions, > > Michael > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --Boundary-02=_qzzAAd9UyhSTZen Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAAzzpBylq0S4AzzwRAhgfAJ9sDduPOsh4eg8RbC+BJ2itscz3jwCfTEP7 421PZ8afN8HF6cG79A2k0e8= =rRQg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_qzzAAd9UyhSTZen-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 16:52:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E0016A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:52:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from crumpet.united-ware.com (ddsl-66-42-172-210.fuse.net [66.42.172.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A1343D31 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:52:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) Received: from 192.168.0.6 (adsl-64-108-97-94.dsl.wotnoh.ameritech.net [64.108.97.94]) (authenticated bits=0)i0CNqJuq031063 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:52:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mistry.7@osu.edu) From: Anish Mistry To: Jason Williams Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:50:48 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <5.2.1.1.0.20040112155511.00aab178@pop.courtesymortgage.com> In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.0.20040112155511.00aab178@pop.courtesymortgage.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_oD0AA0w+BYdp5jJ"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200401121950.48946.mistry.7@osu.edu> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cyrus-imapd2 installed through ports question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:52:04 -0000 --Boundary-02=_oD0AA0w+BYdp5jJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: signed data Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 12 January 2004 06:59 pm, Jason Williams wrote: > Hello everyone. >=20 > I was having a problem after I installed cyrus-imapd2 through the ports=20 tree. > Everything on the installation went well. However, im seeing a error pop= =20 up=20 > in my log that I cannot figure out. > Thus, I thought i'd ask here, see if anyone had any similiar problems. >=20 > Note, this is on a FreeBSD 4.9 box: > Cyrus-imapd-2.1.16 > Cyrus-sasl-2.1.17 > BerkeleyDB-4.1.25 >=20 > This is from my /var/log/auth.log >=20 > >Jan 5 23:54:39 obsidianbox imapd[8015]: OTP unavailable because can't=20 > >read/write key database /etc/opiekeys: Permission denied > >Jan 5 23:54:43 obsidianbox imapd[8015]: no user in db I get this too in my logs, but the user is still there, and found by the=20 operation that tries to find the user, and everything still seems to work,= =20 so I ignore it and chalk it up to a cyrus bug. =2D-=20 Anish Mistry --Boundary-02=_oD0AA0w+BYdp5jJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBAA0DoxqA5ziudZT0RAk/iAJ9fWMo5zL+5LJzZqA+NusF9x7gyVACg3wsI YdUiJGS5448L0BRAZXzNtOk= =ZxJN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_oD0AA0w+BYdp5jJ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 17:13:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D34516A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:13:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay3.softcomca.com (relay3.softcomca.com [168.144.1.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8824743D41 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:13:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from somatic@phreaker.net) Received: from M2W045.mail2web.com ([168.144.251.151]) by relay3.softcomca.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:13:14 -0500 Message-ID: <63340-22004121311314124@M2W045.mail2web.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Originating-IP: 203.193.153.193 X-URL: http://mail2web.com/ From: "somatic@phreaker.net" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:13:14 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2004 01:13:14.0419 (UTC) FILETIME=[6B2E2030:01C3D972] Subject: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: somatic@phreaker.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:13:17 -0000 Hi, During installation , after the device probe i get a message saying that n= o disk drives were ffound and the installation stops there=2E Also its unable to load a few modules=2E I have dedicated a formatted 1=2E6 gb HD for the install so theres no prob= lem with partitions=2EAny suggestions? Thanks, Akshay=2E -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web=2Ecom/ =2E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 17:22:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679E116A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:22:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from fed1mtao02.cox.net (fed1mtao02.cox.net [68.6.19.243]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567A843D31 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:22:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brently@bjwcs.com) Received: from SAMBA ([68.98.26.35]) by fed1mtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040113012230.MPNC27510.fed1mtao02.cox.net@SAMBA> for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:22:30 -0500 From: "Brent Wiese" To: Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:20:17 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcOu/A43tMje73hhSoWDfeE30nRpcQqdzA6Q X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: <200311201118.55692.pvandenbergen@swin.edu.au> Message-Id: <20040113012230.MPNC27510.fed1mtao02.cox.net@SAMBA> Subject: RE: Mini atx for firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:22:33 -0000 > also you can get PCI doublers... no idea how well they work, > but! anyone had > experience of them? You can always get the Intel dual/quad server NIC's. Even come in dual gig-e flavor! Brent From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 17:22:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB77E16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:22:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from fed1mtao02.cox.net (fed1mtao02.cox.net [68.6.19.243]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8DA643D31 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:22:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brently@bjwcs.com) Received: from SAMBA ([68.98.26.35]) by fed1mtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040113012232.MPNJ27510.fed1mtao02.cox.net@SAMBA>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:22:32 -0500 From: "Brent Wiese" To: "'Ian Barnes'" , Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:20:17 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcPHPKLP/H6XPaJlTrSUVTZIIjor+wSNbBAQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <20040113012232.MPNJ27510.fed1mtao02.cox.net@SAMBA> Subject: RE: Mail in a Jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:22:34 -0000 > Hi, > > I run my web sites from a jail. The time has come that i now > need to send an > email from one of those sites using the mail() function in php. > > I would like to know, what files do i need to be able to send > mail from the > jail using the mail command. The box is using sendmail as its > mta, and is > running 4.9 release. This plagued me too. I found a very easy solution: esmtp in the ports. A few catches: 1: You need an external SMTP server that will relay the mail for you. I was unable to get it to talk to the main host's SMTP, probably a "feature" of jailing... Luckily, I have another box on the LAN who's sole purpose is to relay mail for machines on the LAN. 2: After you install esmtp, change your sendmail links (/usr/sbin/sendmail at least I think) to point at it. 3: If you compiled PHP w/ a non-existent sendmail, you have to recompile. It's a little confusing, but if you dig far enough in the docs, mail() will not compile if sendmail doesn't exist (it tests). Enjoy! Brent From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 17:26:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E49616A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:26:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.devrandom.org.uk (82-68-135-38.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.68.135.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C2E43D64 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:25:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from howells@kde.org) Received: from 0-c-6e-e5-27-1.middleearth (0-c-6e-e5-27-1.middleearth [192.168.1.183]) by mail.devrandom.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46FD4133BB for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:25:52 +0000 (GMT) From: Chris Howells Organization: K Desktop Environment To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:25:22 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.94 References: <20031119092126.X20731@zoraida.natserv.net> In-Reply-To: <20031119092126.X20731@zoraida.natserv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200401130125.22471.howells@kde.org> Subject: Re: Mini atx for firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:26:01 -0000 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 19 November 2003 14:24, Francisco Reyes wrote: > My primary concern is the network card. Since these small machines only > have one PCI slot I will add one card for the internal network and then > would need the onboard card to connect to the outside world. I just got a 4 port Adaptec NIC very very cheaply from ebay (about =A320 GB= P,=20 which included international shipping). Works great with de(4). I had the same problem with lack of PCI slots, my server/router is mini-AT= X=20 based and so only has three PCI slots, so it's working great now with PCI=20 IDE ,SCSI and 4 port net. =2D --=20 Cheers, Chris Howells -- chris@chrishowells.co.uk, howells@kde.org Web: http://chrishowells.co.uk, PGP ID: 0x33795A2C KDE/Qt/C++/PHP Developer: http://www.kde.org =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAA0kCF8Iu1zN5WiwRAqxpAKCCXPNclEZcDKchcbm3NnKP06kTIACffyHi T+U46+LtulUZmVdF7fJ9PxQ=3D =3DPL1e =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 17:32:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A06A16A522 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:32:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from fed1mtao02.cox.net (fed1mtao02.cox.net [68.6.19.243]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E13F43D66 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:32:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brently@bjwcs.com) Received: from SAMBA ([68.98.26.35]) by fed1mtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040113013245.MTYQ27510.fed1mtao02.cox.net@SAMBA>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:32:45 -0500 From: "Brent Wiese" To: "'Bill Asher'" , Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:30:31 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcO5uaJj1pgbsS35TxWCf3COIbtc1gfuliLQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <20040113013245.MTYQ27510.fed1mtao02.cox.net@SAMBA> Subject: RE: mpd VPN Server / W2K Clients X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:32:48 -0000 > Hello, > > I am trying to configure mpd for road warrior w2k clients to > connect to, > and I'm running into a few issues, hoping some of you could help out. > I'm not sure if there are other issues that need to be configured > differently besides mpd, like ppp or natd, etc. Or do you > need to change > options in the W2K VPN client. Below are my specs, mpd config > files, and > error message. Please let me know if you have any I know its been a while since you posted (I don't get to read this list as often as I'd like to), but in case you didn't get it working, the thing that threw me for a while was putting "gateway_enable=yes" in rc.conf (syntax might be slightly different). Its in the MPD readme file, but you don't see that file when installing from ports. ;) Don't forget to run some sort of firewall so you only allow pptp traffic to bridge that connection. Brent From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 17:52:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7062B16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:52:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from fed1mtao01.cox.net (fed1mtao01.cox.net [68.6.19.244]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B3943D31 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:52:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brently@bjwcs.com) Received: from SAMBA ([68.98.26.35]) by fed1mtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040113015258.GDTN3322.fed1mtao01.cox.net@SAMBA>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:52:58 -0500 From: "Brent Wiese" To: "'Rogier Krieger'" , "'FreeBSD-questions list'" Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:50:32 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcPTFjsNsBfwi9URQXeqZNJVFBi9jQGYDggQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.20040104235707.0123f9c0@virgiel.xs4all.nl> Message-Id: <20040113015258.GDTN3322.fed1mtao01.cox.net@SAMBA> Subject: RE: Support for affordable S-ATA RAID controllers (xs4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:52:59 -0000 > The 3ware cards are quite expensive, according to the pricing > lists I've > seen so far. I wonder if the 8506-card mentioned in another post also > works in 32bit PCI slots. Otherwise, I'd need a Xeon board. But that's > another post in the thread. 3Ware cards are expensive, but you get what you pay for. Whatever code they have to optimize the disk use works wonders. I also believe the price is reasonable given its hardware RAID5. BE AWARE however (found this out the hard way), their performance optimizing code only works on the FIRST volume. Shouldn't be an issue with a 4-6 port card, but when you use 200gb+ drives on a 12 port card, you end up over the 2TB volume limit and the second volume is slow as molassas... Cheers, Brent From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 17:55:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E28516A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:55:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from mpls-qmqp-04.inet.qwest.net (mpls-qmqp-04.inet.qwest.net [63.231.195.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DD6643D45 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 17:55:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from budec@qwest.net) Received: (qmail 6134 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jan 2004 01:55:06 -0000 Received: from mpls-pop-12.inet.qwest.net (63.231.195.12) by mpls-qmqp-04.inet.qwest.net with QMQP; 13 Jan 2004 01:55:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO abby) (63.231.238.226) by mpls-pop-12.inet.qwest.net with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 01:55:05 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:50:27 -0600 Message-ID: From: "Budec" To: "'FreeBSD-questions list'" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20040113015258.GDTN3322.fed1mtao01.cox.net@SAMBA> Subject: Port forwarding X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:55:09 -0000 Hello, I have been trying to get this working for days and am obviously doing something wrong and was wondering if any Guru's out there could give a little guidance. Basically I'm looking to run a game server behind a FreeBSD firewall. Here is my setup: {internet} <-> [public address] - Firewall <-> (internal address) Game server Lets say public address is 1.2.3.4 and private address is 192.168.17.25 port is 5122 In the /etc/rc.conf I set the firewall policy to "OPEN" and enabled natd, I gave it the natd options of "-f /etc/natd.conf"... for "ipnat" I have that set to "NO" (not sure what it does) In the natd.conf file I have this: redirect_port tcp 192.168.17.25:5122 5122 redirect_port udp 192.168.17.25:5122 5122 I restart natd and theatrically everything that hits 1.2.3.4 on port 5122 should be automatically redirected to 192.168.17.25 port 5122, right? I have also tried this (since the public interface is aliases (has more than one public address associated with it)): redirect_port tcp 192.168.17.25:5122 1.2.3.4:5122 redirect_port udp 192.168.17.25:5122 1.2.3.4:5122 Which doesn't seem to work either. Any ideas? Regards, Jack From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 18:19:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFC316A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:19:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from m00.ca.astound.net (m00.ca.astound.net [64.85.239.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74CA143D54 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:19:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rchopra@cal.berkeley.edu) Received: from cal.berkeley.edu (astound-64-85-244-72.ca.astound.net [64.85.244.72]) by m00.ca.astound.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0D2IjKL016044; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:18:45 -0800 Message-ID: <40035568.6010306@cal.berkeley.edu> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:18:16 -0800 From: Rishi Chopra User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subhro References: <200401111053.QAA05193@manage.24online> In-Reply-To: <200401111053.QAA05193@manage.24online> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: (Yet Another) Home Networking Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:19:30 -0000 Perhaps someone can help me with this small part of rc.firewall: [Ss][Ii][Mm][Pp][Ll][Ee]) ############ # This is a prototype setup for a simple firewall. Configure this # machine as a named server and ntp server, and point all the machines # on the inside at this machine for those services. ############ # set these to your outside interface network and netmask and ip oif="ed0" onet="192.0.2.0" omask="255.255.255.0" oip="192.0.2.1" # set these to your inside interface network and netmask and ip iif="ed1" inet="192.0.2.1" imask="255.255.255.0" iip="192.0.2.17" I'm curious about the difference between 'inet' and 'iip', what each one stands for, and how to configure 'onet/oip' if the outside interface network is configured via DHCP. I'm also curious about this little snippet (under the 'simple' profile): # Everything else is denied by default, unless the # IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT option is set in your kernel # config file. What happens if this option is set in my kernel config file? Can I safely comment out this line and use the 'simple' profile without affecting natd? Subhro wrote: >Hi Rishi, > >You have to forward the ports required by WinVNC on the FreeBSD Gateway. >Have you compiled IPDIVERT in your kernel? Read the ipfw manpages to find >out how to forward ports. > >Regards >Subhro > >Subhro Sankha Kar >Indian Institute of Information Technology >Block AQ-13/1, Sector V >Salt Lake City >PIN 700091 >India >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Rishi Chopra >Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 1:42 PM >To: Mike Maltese >Cc: questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: (Yet Another) Home Networking Question > >I was able to get my network up and running with the suggestions below. >To review, my setup is the following: > >ISP FreeBSD Gateway Win2k Box > > >----------rl0--------------rl1-------------------< >ALL DHCP 192.168.0.1 192.168.0.2 > >rl0 is connected to the modem by ethernet and set for DHCP, the ISP's >method of address asignment. rl1 is the second NIC in the BSD box, and >is connected by crossover cable to the Win2k box. FreeBSD box and Win2k >box can successfully ping each other, and both FreeBSD box and Win2k >have working internet access. Everything is running A-OK. > >If I wish to host WinVNC on the Win2k box, do I need to make any changes >to the Gateway? Specifically, WinVNC requires the Win2k box to be >listening on 5800 and 5900; I have opened these ports (and these ports >only) on the Win2k box. Do I need to change rc.conf or any other files >on the gateway to specify that all incoming connections on 5800 and 5900 >be forwarded from rl0 to rl1? Am I gonna have to step up to IPFW (yuck!) ?? > >Thanks, >Rishi > >Mike Maltese wrote: > > > >>>(1) in /etc/rc.conf, I added the following >>> natd_enable="YES" >>> natd_interface="rl0" ### public interface connected to cable modem >>> gateway_enable="YES" >>> defaultrouter="192.168.0.1" ### LAN machines use this >>> ifconfig_rl0="DHCP" ### Astound uses dhcp >>> ifconfig_rl1="inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" ### use for LAN >>> hostname="idfubar.dyndns.org" >>> >>> >>> >>> >>As a first step, try adding these lines to rc.conf: >> >>firewall_enable="YES" >>firewall_type="open" >> >>This will enable diversion of all traffic to natd. Read the man pages for >>natd and ipfw and >>http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls.html >>for more information. >> >>The easiest way to reinitialize the system is to type "shutdown now". This >>will drop you into single user mode. Press return when prompted for a >> >> >shell. > > >>Hit Ctrl+D and the rc system will be run through and put you back into >>multi-user mode. Check for connectivity from the router and the Windows >> >> >box. > > >>As a side note, you can delete the defaultrouter entry. That's for your >>FreeBSD box, not LAN clients. It's getting reset by dhclient when it gets >>lease information from your ISP's DHCP server anyway. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 18:19:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB23F16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:19:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net (mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net [63.231.195.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12AE443D2D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:19:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from budec@qwest.net) Received: (qmail 75679 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jan 2004 01:27:25 -0000 Received: from mpls-pop-02.inet.qwest.net (63.231.195.2) by mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net with QMQP; 13 Jan 2004 01:27:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO abby) (63.231.238.226) by mpls-pop-02.inet.qwest.net with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 02:19:23 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:14:45 -0600 Message-ID: From: "Budec" To: "Ronnie Clark" , "'Budec'" , "'FreeBSD-questions list'" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <003801c3d97a$ef12f3a0$0a07070a@bullitt> Subject: RE: Port forwarding X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:19:30 -0000 Thanks for the reply. I'm using the default 'rc.firewall' and in the /etc/rc.config I have it set up to use "OPEN". >From what I can tell, it looks like I'm passing everything by default... here is a snip of the config (not all of the /etc/rc.firewall file, just the OPEN parts) [snip] case ${firewall_type} in [Oo][Pp][Ee][Nn]|[Cc][Ll][Ii][Ee][Nn][Tt]) case ${natd_enable} in [Yy][Ee][Ss]) if [ -n "${natd_interface}" ]; then ${fwcmd} add 50 divert natd all from any to any via ${natd_interface} fi ;; esac esac [snip] case ${firewall_type} in [Oo][Pp][Ee][Nn]) # bud #${fwcmd} add count log tcp from any to any setup #${fwcmd} add count log udp from any to any keep-state # clients # ${fwcmd} add allow tcp from any to 192.168.17.1 5121 keep-state # ${fwcmd} add allow udp from any to 192.168.17.1 5121 keep-state # ${fwcmd} add allow tcp from any to 192.168.17.25 5121 keep-state # ${fwcmd} add allow udp from any to 192.168.17.25 5121 keep-state # Gamespy # ${fwcmd} add allow udp from 192.168.17.1 5121 to 216.177.89.34 27900 keep-state # ${fwcmd} add allow udp from 192.168.17.1 5121 to 66.244.193.142 5121 keep-state # ${fwcmd} add allow udp from 192.168.17.25 5121 to 216.177.89.34 27900 keep-state # ${fwcmd} add allow udp from 192.168.17.25 5121 to 66.244.193.142 5121 keep-state ${fwcmd} add 65000 pass all from any to any ;; 'pass all from any to any' should do it right? Regards, Jack > -----Original Message----- > From: Ronnie Clark [mailto:ronnie@txnetsecurity.com] > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 8:14 PM > To: 'Budec'; 'FreeBSD-questions list' > Subject: RE: Port forwarding > > > Jack, > > What do our firewall rules look like? Is there a rule to allow > 5122 traffic > into the outside interface? > > Just a thought, > Ron Clark > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Budec > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 7:50 PM > To: 'FreeBSD-questions list' > Subject: Port forwarding > > > > > > Hello, > > I have been trying to get this working for days and am obviously doing > something wrong and was wondering if any Guru's out there could give a > little guidance. Basically I'm looking to run a game server behind a > FreeBSD firewall. Here is my setup: > > {internet} <-> [public address] - Firewall <-> (internal address) Game > server > > Lets say public address is 1.2.3.4 and private address is > 192.168.17.25 port > is 5122 > > > In the /etc/rc.conf I set the firewall policy to "OPEN" and > enabled natd, I > gave it the natd options of "-f /etc/natd.conf"... for "ipnat" I have that > set to "NO" (not sure what it does) > > In the natd.conf file I have this: > > redirect_port tcp 192.168.17.25:5122 5122 > redirect_port udp 192.168.17.25:5122 5122 > > I restart natd and theatrically everything that hits 1.2.3.4 on port 5122 > should be automatically redirected to 192.168.17.25 port 5122, right? > > I have also tried this (since the public interface is aliases > (has more than > one public address associated with it)): > > redirect_port tcp 192.168.17.25:5122 1.2.3.4:5122 > redirect_port udp 192.168.17.25:5122 1.2.3.4:5122 > > > > Which doesn't seem to work either. Any ideas? > > Regards, > Jack > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 18:38:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB9816A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:38:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C59843D2F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:38:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jadams01@sprynet.com) Received: from sprynet.com ([68.158.5.45]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040113023820.SHGN1951.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@sprynet.com> for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:38:20 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:40:02 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: John Adams To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553) Subject: New installation: Hanging when trying to dial out X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:38:22 -0000 Hi, folks, I've got a brand-new installation of FreeBSD and the next thing I want to do is upgrade from 4.6 (the CD I had) to 4.9 or 5.1. However, first I need to dial out, and there I'm having a problem. I've followed the instructions (I hope!) in Chapter 18 of the handbook, and whatever approach I take to dialing out, the box hangs--I can't even Alt-F3 to a new shell. This happens whether I'm using cu or trying a manual connection in ppp. When I do the latter, after I type term, I get the responses, but, after type '~?' for help, the keyboard stops responding. ~. doesn't get me out of it--nothing does. The box is an eMachines etower 600is and the modem is a Microcom Deskporte 28.8P. Any help would be greatly appreciated. All the best, John A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 18:39:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2B216A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:39:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E14B43D46 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:39:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2004011302395001600nqvvge>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:39:50 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 92AC93A; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:39:50 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Jason Taylor References: <4002D4D2.3030204@bastyr.edu> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 12 Jan 2004 21:39:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4002D4D2.3030204@bastyr.edu> Message-ID: <441xq4mv0p.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pr 53245 fixed in 5.2R? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:39:52 -0000 Jason Taylor writes: > Has the fix for this problem been incorporated into 5.2-RC2? I've > searched, but haven't found a definitive > answer. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=53245 Quoting the PR you reference: Fixed in revision 1.41 of ida_disk.c. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area: resume/CV at http://be-well.ilk.org:8088/~lowell/resume/ username/password "public" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 18:44:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A6B16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:44:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from amex.kq.no (amex.kq.no [193.71.71.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F9F43D1F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:44:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from heine@mittlille.net) Received: by amex.kq.no (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 7B55054609; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:44:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.eunet.no (smtp.eunet.no [193.71.71.243]) by amex.kq.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6101D53ECC for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:44:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from teddy.mittlille.net (unknown [217.8.138.132]) by smtp.eunet.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0B3C54D2 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:44:25 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1523970523.1062.6.camel@linuxppc> Message-ID: From: =?utf-8?Q?Heine_Aarb=C3=B8?= Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:43:38 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1523970523.1062.6.camel@linuxppc> User-Agent: Opera7.23/FreeBSD M2 build 518 Subject: Re: Install bug - 4.9 stable - post install circular reboot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:44:30 -0000 On 17 Apr 2018 09:10:14 -0400, Kevin Berrien wrote: Have you tied installing with the corect date and year? I would guess the system will mislike the date and year in some way.. I know that it have if you are in the past.. (sysdate older than installfiles.) -- Heine Aarbø heine@mittlille.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 18:45:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF9916A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:45:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9521743D45 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:45:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004011302452401400pnnsee>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:45:28 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4BB4B55; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:45:20 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Tillman Hodgson References: <20040112221218.GI66765@seekingfire.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 12 Jan 2004 21:45:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20040112221218.GI66765@seekingfire.com> Message-ID: <44u130lg73.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 23 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: ngctl and rc.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD-Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:45:29 -0000 Tillman Hodgson writes: > Howdy folks, > > What's the best way to build ng_one2many interfaces into rc.conf such > that they're brought up (live) at the "normal" time so that: > > 1) configuration remains centralized in rc.conf > 2) other pieces that depend on a network being present don't fail in > enlightening ways? > > I want to avoid the "make a shell script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d" > approach. Nobody else has written this shell script for you, so you can't just configure it in rc.conf and turn it on. If you want, you can add it to rc.network and submit the patches in a PR, so future upgrades will include it. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area: resume/CV at http://be-well.ilk.org:8088/~lowell/resume/ username/password "public" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 18:46:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C789416A4D4 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:46:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-lbl.southeast.rr.com [24.25.9.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3B843D6D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:46:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wegster@mindcore.net) Received: from mindcore.net (rdu162-234-100.nc.rr.com [24.162.234.100]) i0D2kHKY024291; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:46:17 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <40035BF9.1030705@mindcore.net> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:46:17 -0500 From: Scott W User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20031129 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rishi Chopra References: <200401111053.QAA05193@manage.24online> <40035568.6010306@cal.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <40035568.6010306@cal.berkeley.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: (Yet Another) Home Networking Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:46:50 -0000 Rishi Chopra wrote: > Perhaps someone can help me with this small part of rc.firewall: > > [Ss][Ii][Mm][Pp][Ll][Ee]) > ############ > # This is a prototype setup for a simple firewall. Configure this > # machine as a named server and ntp server, and point all the > machines > # on the inside at this machine for those services. > ############ > > # set these to your outside interface network and netmask and ip > oif="ed0" > onet="192.0.2.0" > omask="255.255.255.0" > oip="192.0.2.1" > > # set these to your inside interface network and netmask and ip > iif="ed1" > inet="192.0.2.1" > imask="255.255.255.0" > iip="192.0.2.17" > > I'm curious about the difference between 'inet' and 'iip', what each > one stands for, and how to configure 'onet/oip' if the outside > interface network is configured via DHCP. > > I'm also curious about this little snippet (under the 'simple' profile): > > # Everything else is denied by default, unless the > # IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT option is set in your kernel > # config file. > > What happens if this option is set in my kernel config file? Can I > safely comment out this line and use the 'simple' profile without > affecting natd? > [original questions responses snipped] inet = network, which is in part defined by your netmask- eg a netmask of 255.255.255.0 says that the first 3 octets are defining your network, and the last 3 define the individual host, thus a netmask of 255.255.255.0 allows for 256 hosts in theory, although .255 is the broadcast address, 0 is the network.... oip = actual IP address, which is a combination of the network you're on (192.0.2.0 in this case) and your host identifier (.1 in this case), so 192.0.2.1 I'm sure there are a million TCP/IP tutorials available on google, but doing a search on 'netmask' should explain anything I didn't do so well on ;-) Presumaby, IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT allows all packets throug the firewall as the default ruleset, which means the majority of your rules would become 'deny rules' to reject specific ports/packets etc..otherwise it's reversed, rejecting any/all packets unless you explictly allow them. Similar behavior to the functionality of the hosts.allow and hosts.deny files.... Obviously, denying everything explicitly not allowed by your ruleset is more secure....however, where you're unsure what ports (and protocols) specific applications or services use, expect to wind up spending a fair amount of time in refining your ruleset until all services you want allowed are in fact passed by the firewall. Accepting everything other than what you explicitly reject is better than no firewall, and isn't a bad starting point, combined with the output of netstat to monitor connections on a server, figuring out what traffic you absolutely must allow, and then eventually converting the system to a 'reject all' setup (after creating the 'allow ruleset' of course).... Scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 18:51:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F5416A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:51:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B9F43D1D for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:51:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <2004011302514601600fjelee>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:51:47 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id C69C73A; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:51:46 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Rishi Chopra References: <200401111053.QAA05193@manage.24online> <40035568.6010306@cal.berkeley.edu> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 12 Jan 2004 21:51:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <40035568.6010306@cal.berkeley.edu> Message-ID: <44ptdolfwd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 55 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: (Yet Another) Home Networking Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:51:50 -0000 Rishi Chopra writes: > Perhaps someone can help me with this small part of rc.firewall: > > [Ss][Ii][Mm][Pp][Ll][Ee]) > ############ > # This is a prototype setup for a simple firewall. Configure this > # machine as a named server and ntp server, and point all the machines > # on the inside at this machine for those services. > ############ > > # set these to your outside interface network and netmask and ip > oif="ed0" > onet="192.0.2.0" > omask="255.255.255.0" > oip="192.0.2.1" > > # set these to your inside interface network and netmask and ip > iif="ed1" > inet="192.0.2.1" > imask="255.255.255.0" > iip="192.0.2.17" > > I'm curious about the difference between 'inet' and 'iip', what each > one stands for, and how to configure 'onet/oip' if the outside > interface network is configured via DHCP. Look a little more closely at the comment right before those lines. 'iif' is "Inside InterFace," 'inet' is "Inside NETwork," 'imask' is "Inside netMASK," and 'iip' is "Inside IP address." If your ouside address is assigned by DHCP, you can't set those in the script. You can use the "me" keyword (see "man 8 ipfw"), or set up the firewall in a DHCP hook, or just skip the address (it doesn't actually give you any extra security if you've got a single address on a single Ethernet network). > I'm also curious about this little snippet (under the 'simple' profile): > > # Everything else is denied by default, unless the > # IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT option is set in your kernel > # config file. > > What happens if this option is set in my kernel config file? Can I > safely comment out this line and use the 'simple' profile without > affecting natd? It doesn't affect natd either way. Defaulting to deny is definitely the way to configure a firewall for security purposes -- don't accept anything you haven't explicitly configured yourself to let in. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area: resume/CV at http://be-well.ilk.org:8088/~lowell/resume/ username/password "public" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 18:52:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F89116A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:52:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from malle.himolde.no (malle.hiMolde.no [158.38.68.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A522243D58 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:52:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Jefferson.San.Juan@hiMolde.no) Received: from JANELLE (sfrn-spc88.stud-bolig.hiMolde.no [158.38.88.88]) by malle.himolde.no (8.12.8/8.12.8) with SMTP id i0D2psW7028665 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:51:54 +0100 Message-ID: <000d01c3d980$5521b6e0$5858269e@JANELLE> From: "Jefferson San Juan" To: Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:52:49 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: binary execute restrictions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:52:53 -0000 How do I restrict normal users from executing their own compiled executable binary files? I use FreeBSD 4.9. - Jefferson From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 18:59:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B614D16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:59:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta10.adelphia.net (mta10.adelphia.net [68.168.78.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688DB43D46 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:59:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.103]) by mta10.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20040113025907.NZWP1458.mta10.adelphia.net@barbish>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:59:07 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "John Adams" , Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:59:07 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: New installation: Hanging when trying to dial out X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:59:10 -0000 It would be a whole lot more helpful if you posted your ppp.conf and the ppp.log of your last test Explain how you know FBSD has found your modem and can connect to it. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of John Adams Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 9:40 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: New installation: Hanging when trying to dial out Hi, folks, I've got a brand-new installation of FreeBSD and the next thing I want to do is upgrade from 4.6 (the CD I had) to 4.9 or 5.1. However, first I need to dial out, and there I'm having a problem. I've followed the instructions (I hope!) in Chapter 18 of the handbook, and whatever approach I take to dialing out, the box hangs--I can't even Alt-F3 to a new shell. This happens whether I'm using cu or trying a manual connection in ppp. When I do the latter, after I type term, I get the responses, but, after type '~?' for help, the keyboard stops responding. ~. doesn't get me out of it--nothing does. The box is an eMachines etower 600is and the modem is a Microcom Deskporte 28.8P. Any help would be greatly appreciated. All the best, John A _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 19:00:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA3116A4D0 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:00:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A410143D3F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:00:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i0D30Bi05045; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:00:11 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: ecrist@adtechintegrated.com, Marty Landman , Nathan Alan Souer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:00:11 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200401121756.32839.theologicka@secure-computing.net> <6.0.0.22.0.20040112190349.12200f98@pop.face2interface.com> <200401121809.29634.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> In-Reply-To: <200401121809.29634.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401121900.11391.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: test X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:00:19 -0000 On Monday 12 January 2004 04:09 pm, Eric F Crist wrote: > On Monday 12 January 2004 06:04 pm, Marty Landman wrote: > > At 06:56 PM 1/12/2004, Nathan Alan Souer wrote: > > >test > > > > did we pass? > > Sorry, folks. This is my friend and I will make certain Nate gets a good, > solid beating. Add one more stroke for encapsulating his message so that no one can quote it :). Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 19:08:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49EA316A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:08:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from m00.ca.astound.net (m00.ca.astound.net [64.85.239.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0613643D4C for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:08:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rchopra@cal.berkeley.edu) Received: from cal.berkeley.edu (astound-64-85-244-72.ca.astound.net [64.85.244.72]) by m00.ca.astound.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0D37iKL015485 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:07:44 -0800 Message-ID: <400360E4.3020401@cal.berkeley.edu> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:07:16 -0800 From: Rishi Chopra User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200401111053.QAA05193@manage.24online> <40035568.6010306@cal.berkeley.edu> <44ptdolfwd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44ptdolfwd.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Re: (Yet Another) Home Networking Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:08:22 -0000 Thanks for the generally good info; the 'me' keyword was the key piece of info that I needed =) Lowell Gilbert wrote: >Rishi Chopra writes: > > > >>Perhaps someone can help me with this small part of rc.firewall: >> >>[Ss][Ii][Mm][Pp][Ll][Ee]) >> ############ >> # This is a prototype setup for a simple firewall. Configure this >> # machine as a named server and ntp server, and point all the machines >> # on the inside at this machine for those services. >> ############ >> >> # set these to your outside interface network and netmask and ip >> oif="ed0" >> onet="192.0.2.0" >> omask="255.255.255.0" >> oip="192.0.2.1" >> >> # set these to your inside interface network and netmask and ip >> iif="ed1" >> inet="192.0.2.1" >> imask="255.255.255.0" >> iip="192.0.2.17" >> >>I'm curious about the difference between 'inet' and 'iip', what each >>one stands for, and how to configure 'onet/oip' if the outside >>interface network is configured via DHCP. >> >> > >Look a little more closely at the comment right before those lines. >'iif' is "Inside InterFace," 'inet' is "Inside NETwork," 'imask' is >"Inside netMASK," and 'iip' is "Inside IP address." > >If your ouside address is assigned by DHCP, you can't set those in the >script. You can use the "me" keyword (see "man 8 ipfw"), or set up >the firewall in a DHCP hook, or just skip the address (it doesn't >actually give you any extra security if you've got a single address on >a single Ethernet network). > > > >>I'm also curious about this little snippet (under the 'simple' profile): >> >> # Everything else is denied by default, unless the >> # IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT option is set in your kernel >> # config file. >> >>What happens if this option is set in my kernel config file? Can I >>safely comment out this line and use the 'simple' profile without >>affecting natd? >> >> > >It doesn't affect natd either way. Defaulting to deny is definitely >the way to configure a firewall for security purposes -- don't accept >anything you haven't explicitly configured yourself to let in. > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 19:23:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3976016A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:23:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from zoot.lafn.org (zoot.lafn.ORG [206.117.18.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448A543D5F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:23:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (host-66-81-176-135.rev.o1.com [66.81.176.135]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.12.3p3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i0D3NLMF069540 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:23:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) In-Reply-To: <63340-22004121311314124@M2W045.mail2web.com> References: <63340-22004121311314124@M2W045.mail2web.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Doug Hardie Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:23:20 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.609) Subject: I need to resend messages from dead.letters X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:23:26 -0000 There was a problem last night with my mail server and a bunch of mail went into the dead.letters mailbox rather than being sent. I have that mailbox and need a way to send all of those messages. I split them out into individual files, but there are just too many to send by hand. Is there a way to cause them all to be resent? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 19:29:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5189E16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:29:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEAE43D55 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:29:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jadams01@sprynet.com) Received: from sprynet.com ([68.158.5.45]) by imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net ESMTP <20040113032951.TJZD1951.imf22aec.mail.bellsouth.net@sprynet.com>; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:29:51 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:31:07 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553) To: From: John Adams In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New installation: Hanging when trying to dial out X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:29:53 -0000 On Monday, January 12, 2004, at 09:59 PM, fbsd_user wrote: > It would be a whole lot more helpful if you posted your ppp.conf > and the ppp.log of your last test I may have to type this in--I'm unable to mount the floppy drive, and MAKEDEV is telling me "bad unit for disk in: fd*" for each /dev/fd*. Should I consider this a second message to me saying, you have weird hardware, and give up? I'd rather not. Perhaps I have a different problem to work with first, getting the floppy mounted so I can write logs to it. Advice? > Explain how you know FBSD has found your modem and can connect to > it. Perhaps it hasn't--the last thing in the ppp.log is: ppp[116]: tun0 : Command: /dev/tty: set device cuaa0 That's from the interactive mode entry. From the auto mode entry, the last listing is: ppp[116]: tun0: Phase: PPP Started (auto mode) All the best, John A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 19:37:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A917F16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:37:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from darkstar.blacksun.net.au (darkstar.blacksun.net.au [210.8.131.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B347943D1F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:37:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ahill@blacksun.net.au) Received: by darkstar.blacksun.net.au (Postfix, from userid 500) id 839DE419D6; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:38:14 +1100 (EST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:38:14 +1100 From: FreeBSD User To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040113033814.GA15670@darkstar.blacksun.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: cant boot from large disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:37:54 -0000 Howdy Questions, I am having problems with 4.8 Release booting from a large hard disk (80 - 160G) on an old (socket7) motherboard. I have the same problem with linux. Making the root partition smaller that 1000M, puting it on the first disk, etc etc doesnt help in either case. I have also tried a few different bootloaders, in all cases, the bootloader either failed to load, or failed to boot the OS. With Linux (redhat7.x) I was able to build a bootable floppy on which the location of the root partition was stored, and boot off that. I could also interrupt the boot, enter different values, and boot off of a different partition. Hardly ideal, but satisfactory. I was kind of hoping to do the same thing with FreeBSD. (which atm resides on a 160G HD with the root partition in a seperate 900M slice.) Any hints ? Cheers. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 19:43:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABF4416A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:43:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net (mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net [63.231.195.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B68343D46 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:43:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from budec@qwest.net) Received: (qmail 11611 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jan 2004 02:51:04 -0000 Received: from mpls-pop-14.inet.qwest.net (63.231.195.14) by mpls-qmqp-02.inet.qwest.net with QMQP; 13 Jan 2004 02:51:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO abby) (63.231.238.226) by mpls-pop-14.inet.qwest.net with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 03:43:01 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:38:23 -0600 Message-ID: From: "Budec" To: "Ronnie Clark" , "'Budec'" , "'FreeBSD-questions list'" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: <005001c3d981$77e34ee0$0a07070a@bullitt> Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Port forwarding X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:43:07 -0000 Here is a sump, but don't understand it to well. The server is up on 192.168.17.25:5122, I can connect to it internally. The public interface is 63.231.238.22[6-9] (alaised). Here is how I did the dump: fired up server on 192.168.17.25:5122 fired up client on 192.168.17.25 start tcpdump tried to connect client to 63.231.236:5122 (got a timeout) right here is says: 21:05:34.275532 63.231.238.226 > 192.168.17.25: icmp: 63.231.238.226 udp port 5122 unreachable I can connect to 192.168.17.25:5122, but can not connect to 63.231.238.226:5122 (which is what the redirect was supose to do)... odd. : tcpdump tcpdump: listening on dc0 21:05:32.595934 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 387949093:387949113(20) ack 293470606 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0] 21:05:32.596229 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 20 win 64671 (DF) 21:05:32.814715 modemcable061.174-130-66.mc.videotron.ca.timeflies > 192.168.17.25.5122: udp 30 21:05:32.827613 192.168.17.25.5122 > modemcable061.174-130-66.mc.videotron.ca.timeflies: udp 82 21:05:33.686005 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 20:96(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:33.776010 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 96:204(108) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:33.776302 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 204 win 64487 (DF) 21:05:34.275477 192.168.17.25.5120 > 63.231.238.226.5122: udp 7 21:05:34.275532 63.231.238.226 > 192.168.17.25: icmp: 63.231.238.226 udp port 5122 unreachable 21:05:34.757215 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 204:280(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:34.825972 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 280:348(68) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:34.827014 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 348 win 64343 (DF) 21:05:35.806324 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 348:424(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:35.981990 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 424 win 64267 (DF) 21:05:36.825995 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 424:484(60) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:36.966216 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 484 win 64207 (DF) 21:05:37.265686 192.168.17.25.5120 > 63.231.238.226.5122: udp 7 21:05:37.265739 63.231.238.226 > 192.168.17.25: icmp: 63.231.238.226 udp port 5122 unreachable 21:05:37.806579 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 484:568(84) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:37.950460 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 568 win 64123 (DF) 21:05:38.610046 66-252-38-4.da.midmaine.com.4796 > 192.168.17.25.5122: udp 30 21:05:38.622523 192.168.17.25.5122 > 66-252-38-4.da.midmaine.com.4796: udp 82 21:05:38.826013 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 568:620(52) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:38.995998 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 620:696(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:38.996292 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 696 win 65535 (DF) 21:05:39.977208 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 696:764(68) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:40.137627 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 764 win 65467 (DF) 21:05:40.264393 192.168.17.25.5120 > 63.231.238.226.5122: udp 7 21:05:40.264446 63.231.238.226 > 192.168.17.25: icmp: 63.231.238.226 udp port 5122 unreachable 21:05:40.977293 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 764:840(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:41.121873 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 840 win 65391 (DF) 21:05:41.995989 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 840:900(60) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:42.106104 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 900 win 65331 (DF) 21:05:42.887644 192.168.17.25 > one.knight-sec.com: ESP(spi=0x90d0bf23,seq=0x14) 21:05:42.973166 one.knight-sec.com > 192.168.17.25: ESP(spi=0x8648ada9,seq=0xf) 21:05:42.996037 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 900:960(60) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:43.046118 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 960:1068(108) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:43.046411 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 1068 win 65163 (DF) 21:05:43.265374 192.168.17.25.5120 > 63.231.238.226.5122: udp 7 21:05:43.265425 63.231.238.226 > 192.168.17.25: icmp: 63.231.238.226 udp port 5122 unreachable 21:05:44.026518 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 1068:1144(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:44.046022 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 1144:1188(44) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:44.046295 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 1188 win 65043 (DF) 21:05:45.026581 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 1188:1272(84) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:45.168160 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 1272 win 64959 (DF) 21:05:46.046080 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 1272:1332(60) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:46.261750 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 1332 win 64899 (DF) 21:05:47.046125 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 1332:1392(60) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:47.245983 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 1392 win 64839 (DF) 21:05:48.046055 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 1392:1452(60) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:48.230221 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 1452 win 64779 (DF) 21:05:49.046131 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 1452:1512(60) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:49.214435 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 1512 win 64719 (DF) 21:05:49.824580 192.168.17.25.5122 > master.gamespy.com.27900: udp 463 21:05:50.046096 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 1512:1564(52) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:50.198686 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 1564 win 64667 (DF) 21:05:50.236133 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 1564:1624(60) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:50.417414 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 1624 win 64607 (DF) 21:05:51.217323 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 1624:1700(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:51.236044 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 1700:1736(36) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:51.236321 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 1736 win 64495 (DF) 21:05:52.217390 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 1736:1812(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:52.385865 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 1812 win 64419 (DF) 21:05:53.236124 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 1812:1864(52) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:53.370092 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 1864 win 64367 (DF) 21:05:54.236184 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 1864:1916(52) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:54.354333 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 1916 win 64315 (DF) 21:05:55.236155 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 1916:1976(60) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:55.447931 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 1976 win 64255 (DF) 21:05:56.236183 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 1976:2036(60) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:56.432154 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 2036 win 64195 (DF) 21:05:57.236219 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 2036:2088(52) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:57.416391 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 2088 win 64143 (DF) 21:05:57.577228 ip68-3-103-163.ph.ph.cox.net.12706 > 192.168.17.25.5122: udp 30 21:05:57.588866 192.168.17.25.5122 > ip68-3-103-163.ph.ph.cox.net.12706: udp 82 21:05:58.236179 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 2088:2140(52) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:58.326254 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 2140:2224(84) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:58.326549 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 2224 win 65535 (DF) 21:05:58.555851 cpe-66-169-5-119.spa.sc.charter.com.1053 > 192.168.17.25.5122: udp 30 21:05:58.557488 192.168.17.25.5122 > cpe-66-169-5-119.spa.sc.charter.com.1053: udp 82 21:05:58.873428 24.107.132.119.charter-stl.com.1054 > 192.168.17.25.5122: udp 30 21:05:58.885534 192.168.17.25.5122 > 24.107.132.119.charter-stl.com.1054: udp 82 21:05:59.306626 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 2224:2300(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:59.436256 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 2300:2384(84) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:59.436555 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 2384 win 65375 (DF) 21:05:59.526237 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 2384:2452(68) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:05:59.712914 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 2452 win 65307 (DF) 21:06:00.506562 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 2452:2520(68) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:00.526183 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 2520:2580(60) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:00.526459 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 2580 win 65179 (DF) 21:06:00.824227 c-24-11-59-38.client.comcast.net.gandalf-lm > 192.168.17.25.5122: udp 30 21:06:00.838438 192.168.17.25.5122 > c-24-11-59-38.client.comcast.net.gandalf-lm: udp 82 21:06:01.506721 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 2580:2656(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:01.666289 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 2656:2740(84) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:01.666572 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 2740 win 65019 (DF) 21:06:02.650062 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 2740:2816(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:02.774998 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 2816 win 64943 (DF) 21:06:02.885181 192.168.17.25 > one.knight-sec.com: ESP(spi=0x90d0bf23,seq=0x15) 21:06:02.973457 one.knight-sec.com > 192.168.17.25: ESP(spi=0x8648ada9,seq=0x10) 21:06:03.646632 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 2816:2900(84) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:03.666188 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 2900:2944(44) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:03.666470 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 2944 win 64815 (DF) 21:06:04.646704 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 2944:3020(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:04.852795 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 3020 win 64739 (DF) 21:06:05.666369 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 3020:3080(60) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:05.837040 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 3080 win 64679 (DF) 21:06:06.668690 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 3080:3132(52) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:06.821273 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 3132 win 64627 (DF) 21:06:07.666278 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 3132:3184(52) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:07.805504 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 3184 win 64575 (DF) 21:06:08.666302 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 3184:3244(60) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:08.789739 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 3244 win 64515 (DF) 21:06:09.666318 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 3244:3304(60) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:09.837344 192.168.17.25.5122 > master.gamespy.com.27900: udp 5 21:06:09.883330 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 3304 win 64455 (DF) 21:06:10.646865 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 3304:3388(84) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:10.758210 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 3388 win 64371 (DF) 21:06:11.666340 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 3388:3440(52) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:11.851798 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 3440 win 64319 (DF) 21:06:12.666316 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 3440:3492(52) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:12.836041 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 3492 win 64267 (DF) 21:06:13.666388 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 3492:3544(52) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:13.820261 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 3544 win 64215 (DF) 21:06:14.666391 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 3544:3596(52) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:14.804498 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 3596 win 64163 (DF) 21:06:15.666409 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 3596:3648(52) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:15.788724 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 3648 win 64111 (DF) 21:06:16.666395 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 3648:3700(52) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:16.882316 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 3700 win 65535 (DF) 21:06:17.666406 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 3700:3752(52) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:17.866562 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 3752 win 65483 (DF) 21:06:18.666390 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 3752:3812(60) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:18.850782 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 3812 win 65423 (DF) 21:06:19.666451 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 3812:3864(52) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:19.835028 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 3864 win 65371 (DF) 21:06:20.666407 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 3864:3916(52) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:20.819235 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 3916 win 65319 (DF) 21:06:21.666432 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 3916:3968(52) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:21.762163 ip68-10-177-79.hr.hr.cox.net.33126 > 192.168.17.25.5122: udp 30 21:06:21.772780 192.168.17.25.5122 > ip68-10-177-79.hr.hr.cox.net.33126: udp 82 21:06:21.803470 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 3968 win 65267 (DF) 21:06:22.666480 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 3968:4012(44) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:22.748967 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 4012:4104(92) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:22.749275 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 4104 win 65131 (DF) 21:06:22.882548 192.168.17.25 > one.knight-sec.com: ESP(spi=0x90d0bf23,seq=0x16) 21:06:22.968825 one.knight-sec.com > 192.168.17.25: ESP(spi=0x8648ada9,seq=0x11) 21:06:23.570299 192.168.17.25.netbios-dgm > 192.168.17.255.netbios-dgm: NBT UDP PACKET(138) 21:06:23.726948 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 4104:4188(84) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:23.727820 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 4188:4288(100) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:23.728027 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 4288 win 64947 (DF) 21:06:24.468705 66-252-38-4.da.midmaine.com.4796 > 192.168.17.25.5122: udp 30 21:06:24.475691 192.168.17.25.5122 > 66-252-38-4.da.midmaine.com.4796: udp 82 21:06:24.726985 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 4288:4364(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:24.746435 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 4364:4416(52) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:24.746721 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 4416 win 64819 (DF) 21:06:25.726874 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 4416:4492(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:25.849770 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 4492 win 64743 (DF) 21:06:26.735672 192.168.17.25.5120 > 255.255.255.255.5121: udp 7 21:06:26.735693 192.168.17.25.5120 > 255.255.255.255.5121: udp 7 21:06:26.736394 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 19 21:06:26.736521 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 19 21:06:26.738129 192.168.17.25.5120 > hydra.5121: udp 6 21:06:26.738189 192.168.17.25.5120 > hydra.5121: udp 11 21:06:26.738235 192.168.17.25.5120 > hydra.5121: udp 6 21:06:26.738401 192.168.17.25.5120 > hydra.5121: udp 6 21:06:26.738457 192.168.17.25.5120 > hydra.5121: udp 6 21:06:26.738487 192.168.17.25.5120 > hydra.5121: udp 6 21:06:26.746483 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 4492:4552(60) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:26.756345 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 25 21:06:26.756439 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 11 21:06:26.756542 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 25 21:06:26.756646 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 25 21:06:26.756753 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 25 21:06:26.756863 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 25 21:06:26.761563 192.168.17.25.5120 > hydra.5121: udp 11 21:06:26.776370 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 11 21:06:26.779024 192.168.17.25.5120 > hydra.5121: udp 11 21:06:26.796286 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 11 21:06:26.800025 192.168.17.25.5120 > hydra.5121: udp 11 21:06:26.816289 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 11 21:06:26.943350 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 4552 win 64683 (DF) 21:06:27.132544 192.168.17.25 > one.knight-sec.com: ESP(spi=0x90d0bf23,seq=0x17) 21:06:27.727556 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 4552:4660(108) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:27.728334 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 4660:4728(68) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:27.728622 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 4728 win 64507 (DF) 21:06:27.729133 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 4728:4804(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:27.729938 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 4804:4872(68) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:27.730182 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 4872 win 64363 (DF) 21:06:27.730839 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 4872:4956(84) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:27.746456 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 4956:4992(36) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:27.746746 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 4992 win 64243 (DF) 21:06:28.245596 192.168.17.25.5120 > hydra.5121: udp 11 21:06:28.256327 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 11 21:06:28.259802 192.168.17.25.5120 > hydra.5121: udp 11 21:06:28.276302 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 11 21:06:28.277412 192.168.17.25.5120 > hydra.5121: udp 11 21:06:28.296300 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 11 21:06:28.298549 192.168.17.25.5120 > hydra.5121: udp 11 21:06:28.316302 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 11 21:06:28.726941 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 4992:5068(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:28.727579 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 5068:5144(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:28.727787 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 5144 win 64091 (DF) 21:06:28.728306 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 5144:5220(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:28.729069 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 5220:5288(68) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:28.729283 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 5288 win 65535 (DF) 21:06:28.746524 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 5288:5332(44) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:28.911838 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 5332 win 65491 (DF) 21:06:29.725041 192.168.17.25.5120 > 255.255.255.255.5121: udp 7 21:06:29.725078 192.168.17.25.5120 > 255.255.255.255.5121: udp 7 21:06:29.726971 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 5332:5408(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:29.727600 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 5408:5476(68) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:29.727866 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 5476 win 65347 (DF) 21:06:29.728302 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 5476:5552(76) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:29.736428 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 19 21:06:29.736551 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 19 21:06:29.737477 192.168.17.25.5120 > hydra.5121: udp 6 21:06:29.737530 192.168.17.25.5120 > hydra.5121: udp 11 21:06:29.741486 192.168.17.25.5120 > hydra.5121: udp 6 21:06:29.746442 63.231.238.229.ssh > 192.168.17.25.2403: P 5552:5580(28) ack 1 win 58400 (DF) [tos 0x10] 21:06:29.746720 192.168.17.25.2403 > 63.231.238.229.ssh: . ack 5580 win 65243 (DF) 21:06:29.756377 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 25 21:06:29.756470 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 11 21:06:29.756576 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 25 21:06:29.761597 192.168.17.25.5120 > hydra.5121: udp 11 21:06:29.776317 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 11 21:06:29.780531 192.168.17.25.5120 > hydra.5121: udp 11 21:06:29.796315 hydra.5121 > 192.168.17.25.5120: udp 11 21:06:29.799719 192.168.17.25.5120 > hydra.5121: udp 11 > -----Original Message----- > From: Ronnie Clark [mailto:ronnie@txnetsecurity.com] > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 9:01 PM > To: 'Budec'; 'FreeBSD-questions list' > Subject: RE: Port forwarding > > > Jack, > > Well, a tcpdump trace should prove whether the traffic is pasing. Do you > have one? > > Ron Clark > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Budec > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 8:15 PM > To: Ronnie Clark; 'Budec'; 'FreeBSD-questions list' > Subject: RE: Port forwarding > > > > > Thanks for the reply. > > I'm using the default 'rc.firewall' and in the /etc/rc.config I > have it set > up to use "OPEN". > >From what I can tell, it looks like I'm passing everything by > >default... > here is a snip of the config (not all of the /etc/rc.firewall > file, just the > OPEN parts) > > [snip] > case ${firewall_type} in > [Oo][Pp][Ee][Nn]|[Cc][Ll][Ii][Ee][Nn][Tt]) > case ${natd_enable} in > [Yy][Ee][Ss]) > if [ -n "${natd_interface}" ]; then > ${fwcmd} add 50 divert natd all from any > to any via > ${natd_interface} > fi > ;; > esac > esac > > > > [snip] > case ${firewall_type} in > [Oo][Pp][Ee][Nn]) > # bud > #${fwcmd} add count log tcp from any to any setup > #${fwcmd} add count log udp from any to any keep-state > > # clients > # ${fwcmd} add allow tcp from any to 192.168.17.1 5121 keep-state > # ${fwcmd} add allow udp from any to 192.168.17.1 5121 keep-state > > # ${fwcmd} add allow tcp from any to 192.168.17.25 5121 keep-state > # ${fwcmd} add allow udp from any to 192.168.17.25 5121 keep-state > > > # Gamespy > # ${fwcmd} add allow udp from 192.168.17.1 5121 to > 216.177.89.34 27900 > keep-state > # ${fwcmd} add allow udp from 192.168.17.1 5121 to > 66.244.193.142 5121 > keep-state > > # ${fwcmd} add allow udp from 192.168.17.25 5121 to 216.177.89.34 > 27900 keep-state > # ${fwcmd} add allow udp from 192.168.17.25 5121 to 66.244.193.142 > 5121 keep-state > > > > ${fwcmd} add 65000 pass all from any to any > ;; > > > > 'pass all from any to any' should do it right? > > > Regards, > Jack > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ronnie Clark [mailto:ronnie@txnetsecurity.com] > > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 8:14 PM > > To: 'Budec'; 'FreeBSD-questions list' > > Subject: RE: Port forwarding > > > > > > Jack, > > > > What do our firewall rules look like? Is there a rule to allow 5122 > > traffic into the outside interface? > > > > Just a thought, > > Ron Clark > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Budec > > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 7:50 PM > > To: 'FreeBSD-questions list' > > Subject: Port forwarding > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > I have been trying to get this working for days and am obviously doing > > something wrong and was wondering if any Guru's out there could give a > > little guidance. Basically I'm looking to run a game server behind a > > FreeBSD firewall. Here is my setup: > > > > {internet} <-> [public address] - Firewall <-> (internal address) Game > > server > > > > Lets say public address is 1.2.3.4 and private address is > > 192.168.17.25 port is 5122 > > > > > > In the /etc/rc.conf I set the firewall policy to "OPEN" and enabled > > natd, I gave it the natd options of "-f /etc/natd.conf"... for "ipnat" > > I have that set to "NO" (not sure what it does) > > > > In the natd.conf file I have this: > > > > redirect_port tcp 192.168.17.25:5122 5122 > > redirect_port udp 192.168.17.25:5122 5122 > > > > I restart natd and theatrically everything that hits 1.2.3.4 on port > > 5122 should be automatically redirected to 192.168.17.25 port 5122, > > right? > > > > I have also tried this (since the public interface is aliases (has > > more than one public address associated with it)): > > > > redirect_port tcp 192.168.17.25:5122 1.2.3.4:5122 > > redirect_port udp 192.168.17.25:5122 1.2.3.4:5122 > > > > > > > > Which doesn't seem to work either. Any ideas? > > > > Regards, > > Jack > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 20:45:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5526816A4DB for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:45:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (law11-f33.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D99F43D58 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:45:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nuckingfutsto@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:45:15 -0800 Received: from 66.65.217.204 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:45:15 GMT X-Originating-IP: [66.65.217.204] X-Originating-Email: [nuckingfutsto@hotmail.com] X-Sender: nuckingfutsto@hotmail.com From: "Ben Dover" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:45:15 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2004 04:45:15.0272 (UTC) FILETIME=[09664080:01C3D990] Subject: cannot open Makefile Error code 2 Installing port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:45:20 -0000 This is probably simple but i can't find the answer in the handbook. I am installing the mod_frontpage port and I get the following error: devnu11# make install clean ===> Building for mod_frontpage-1.6.2 make: cannot open Makefile. *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/www/mod_frontpage. I CAN read the Makefile so I dont know what is wrong. I have tried deleting the distfile hoping to start over but that didnt work. What do I do next? _________________________________________________________________ Let the new MSN Premium Internet Software make the most of your high-speed experience. http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-us&page=byoa/prem&ST=1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 20:56:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02B816A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:56:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.hitmedia.com (mail.hitmedia.com [205.162.11.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BBEB543D1F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:56:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsdlap@hitmedia.com) Received: (qmail 65886 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jan 2004 04:56:28 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:56:28 -0800 From: BSD baby To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040113045628.GA65497@mail.hitmedia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: if a file is used a lot, does it stay in a RAM cache? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:56:29 -0000 If a file is loaded off the hard drive a lot, does FreeBSD keep it in RAM? For my high-traffic website, Apache+PHP, I have a PHP file that I'm going to be including a LOT. The file is 3 megs, though. Takes a few unfortunate seconds to load into memory off of disk the first time. So - what would it take to keep it in RAM instead of being loaded off of hard drive every second of the day? Does FreeBSD do that automatically or do I need some kind of accelerator app? Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 20:56:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9F316A4D3 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:56:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from out6.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net (out6.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net [169.207.3.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9E843D54 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 20:56:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dragoncrest@voyager.net) Received: from mail5.mx.voyager.net (mail5.mx.voyager.net [216.93.66.204]) by out6.mx.nwbl.wi.voyager.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E594F8B3 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:56:41 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (nm3.mx.lnng.mi.voyager.net [216.93.38.229]) by mail5.mx.voyager.net (8.12.9/8.10.2) with ESMTP id i0D4uf78051019 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:56:41 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200401130456.i0D4uf78051019@mail5.mx.voyager.net> From: "Dragoncrest" To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: CoreCommMail X-IPAddress: 69.51.151.143 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:56:41 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Subject: HD and MB selection? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:56:45 -0000 Hi all. Just getting ready to build a new workstation using Freebsd 4.9 (*and eventually 5.x once it reaches the classification of "stable") for up at my job and I'm curious of what motherboard and hard drive would be best to use under Freebsd for maximum compatibility with as few issues as possible. Right now I'm looking at 3 different motherboards, although I'm up for suggestions of other ones if these three really aren't right for the job. MSI K7N2 Delta (nforce) Asus A7N8X (nforce) Asus A7V8X (via) Also, what brand of HD do you guys trust most? What works best with Freebsd? I'm probubly going to pick up a pair of 80g Western Digitals, but again I'm open to other suggestions. Any suggestions are greatly apreciated. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 21:10:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898E616A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:10:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.webspacesolutions.com (ns1.webspacesolutions.com [216.74.11.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E9DC43D1F for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:10:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nick@webspacesolutions.com) Received: (qmail 30826 invoked by uid 507); 13 Jan 2004 04:58:28 -0000 Received: from nick@webspacesolutions.com by ns1.webspacesolutions.com by uid 504 with qmail-scanner-1.20rc1 (clamuko: 0.65. spamassassin: 2.55. Clear:RC:1:. Processed in 0.034773 secs); 13 Jan 2004 04:58:28 -0000 Received: from 24-205-247-185.ata-cres.charterpipeline.net (HELO beastie) (24.205.247.185) by mx1.webspacesolutions.com with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 04:58:28 -0000 From: "Nick Twaddell" To: Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:10:34 -0800 Organization: Web Space Solutions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcPZk5Lpx51k5R1+QS6NL3Wvq2ICyQ== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <107396990863630821@ns1.webspacesolutions.com> Message-Id: <20040113051020.6E9DC43D1F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: pam_chroot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:10:21 -0000 Has anyone got the pam_chroot module to successfully work in FreeBSD? I have FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE installed. I copied the appropriate binaries and libraries into my chroot, I can chroot -u test -g test /home/test /usr/local/bin/bash and it works perfectly. So now I am trying to get the pam module to work. I added session required pam_chroot.so debug into the /etc/pam.d/sshd file. I changed my passwd file so my home dir is /home/test/./ when I try to login as that user, it just kicks me right now. There are no errors in the log :( Connection to wp1 closed by remote host. Connection to wp1 closed. Maybe someone in here can help. Nick ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- Nick Twaddell Web Space Solutions Ph: (805) 704-4038 Fx: (805) 434-2477 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 21:11:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0306E16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:11:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from dexter.starfire.mn.org (starfire.skypoint.net [199.199.159.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D84843D45 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:10:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from john@dexter.starfire.mn.org) Received: (from john@localhost) by dexter.starfire.mn.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id i0D59ck62915 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:09:38 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from john) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:09:38 -0600 From: John To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040112230938.A62891@starfire.mn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Subject: Updating DNS after DHCP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:11:19 -0000 I see that some Microsoft systems send out an update to DNS with the system name. I configured my DNS server to accept these updates, but now that I'm running FreeBSD on a laptop - how do I do that from FreeBSD? I've looked at the dhclient man pages and the named man pages and the pages that they refer to and I didn't pick up any hints there. Can anyone give me a clue? (Yeah - I'm clueless...) Thanks! -- John Lind john@starfire.MN.ORG From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 21:36:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D4F16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:36:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41107.mail.yahoo.com (web41107.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BDA6443D31 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:36:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scott@sremick.net) Message-ID: <20040113053612.32727.qmail@web41107.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.48.174.124] by web41107.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:36:12 PST X-RocketYMMF: siremick Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:36:12 -0800 (PST) From: "Scott I. Remick" To: Sergey 'DoubleF' Zaharchenko , Malcolm Kay In-Reply-To: <20040107081031.04c0df82.doublef@tele-kom.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: "Cannot find file system superblock" error - how to recover? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: scott@sremick.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:36:13 -0000 --- Sergey 'DoubleF' Zaharchenko wrote: > I mean trying to mount it, to fsck it, using dd|hd to find the > superblock, etc. I just want to be *really* sure we know what > we are doing. Well, I don't have experience making bootable FreeBSD floppies... it might be more useful for me to grab a small spare HDD and install 4.9 on it. Should I do that and get back to you once I'm ready? > While we are on that, do you have an empty disk to copy this disk's > contents to? I'm not sure, but maybe I have an idea... I could probably come up with something. Would it have to be installed in the machine, or just available on the network? Unfortunately I don't remember how much data was used on that drive so I don't know what my goal is. :( From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 22:06:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CC616A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:06:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta7.pltn13.pbi.net (mta7.pltn13.pbi.net [64.164.98.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFD543D48 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:06:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from paul@dravis.net) Received: from dravis.net (adsl-63-193-118-191.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.118.191]) by mta7.pltn13.pbi.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0D66KPA006649 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:06:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <40038AE2.5030901@dravis.net> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:06:26 -0800 From: "Paul J. Dravis" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6a) Gecko/20031030 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Open Source report, sponsored by infoDev / World Bank X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 06:06:22 -0000 The report noted below may be of interest. Feel free to share it with others. Your feedback and questions are welcome. Paul ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The report "Open Source Software: Perspectives for Development" was released at the infoDev Symposium, held in conjunction with the World Summit on an Information Society in Geneva (Dec.). This effort was commissioned by infoDev /World Bank. The report intends to assist decision makers, globally, in better understanding Open Source software when assessing this technology option. Presented are initiatives by governments around the world, a selection of private sector uses of Open Source, support by commercial technology providers, a set of case studies in developing countries, along with a brief status of the legal landscape. The report is located at http://www.infodev.org/symp2003/publications/OpenSourceSoftware.pdf ___________________ Paul J. Dravis The Dravis Group www.dravis.net San Francisco, CA 415-665-8745 direct 415-665-8749 fax From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 22:28:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5584816A4CE; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:28:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (bay9-f57.bay9.hotmail.com [64.4.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E32643D6D; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:28:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ganacharya_tanmay@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:26:54 -0800 Received: from 66.229.166.54 by by9fd.bay9.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 06:26:53 GMT X-Originating-IP: [66.229.166.54] X-Originating-Email: [ganacharya_tanmay@hotmail.com] X-Sender: ganacharya_tanmay@hotmail.com From: "Tanmay Ganacharya" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-config@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:56:53 +0530 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2004 06:26:54.0253 (UTC) FILETIME=[3CACE5D0:01C3D99E] Subject: Unit of the t_rtttime value X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 06:28:50 -0000 Hello, Could anyone please tell me the unit of the value stored in the t_rtttime variable in TCP. Also after searching on the internet I found that 1 tick = 224 miliseconds. Please could anyone confirm this. Thanks in advance. TaNmAy _________________________________________________________________ Marriage? http://www.bharatmatrimony.com/cgi-bin/bmclicks1.cgi?74 Join BharatMatrimony.com and get married. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 22:37:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C2D16A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:37:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.maa-net.net (h00095b009f6b.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.128.199.217]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3981A43D6A for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:37:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from michaela@maa-net.net) Received: from bsd.maa-net.net (bsd.maa-net.net [192.168.0.4]) by mail.maa-net.net (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0D6bPpn069432 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:37:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from michaela@maa-net.net) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:37:25 -0500 (EST) From: "Michael A. Alestock" To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040113012652.O6773@bsd.maa-net.net> X-Priority: 1 X-MSMAIL-Priority: High X-message-flag: "MS-Outlook: A program to spread virii, but can do mail too." MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Errors in upgrading ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 06:37:28 -0000 I get numerous errors while trying to, "portsdb -Uu", 'portversion -l "<", and "portupgrade -arR". I don't get any kind of prompt to change anything. How would I go about fixing these errors so that I can upgrade my ports to the latest version(s)?? Here's a snippet from the PORTUPGRADE I did, but it stopped after coming up in error.... Stop in /usr/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade72647.10 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ---> Skipping 'x11/XFree86-4' (XFree86-4.3.0,1) because 'x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer' (XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0) failed ** The following packages were not installed or upgraded (*:skipped / !:failed) ! dns/noip (noip-1.6) (port directory error) ! www/mod_php5 (mod_php5-5.0.0.a3_2,1) (configure error) ! x11/XFree86-4-clients (XFree86-clients-4.3.0_1) (install error) * x11-wm/fluxbox (fluxbox-0.1.14_2) ! x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer (XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0) (linker error) * x11/XFree86-4 (XFree86-4.3.0,1) bsd# From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 23:12:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09E2516A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:12:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.tcbug.org (12-218-40-24.client.mchsi.com [12.218.40.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156AD43D39 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:12:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from friar_josh@ns1.tcbug.org) Received: by ns1.tcbug.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id D8255BAE2; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:12:15 +0000 (GMT) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:12:14 +0000 From: Josh Paetzel To: Dragoncrest Message-ID: <20040113011214.GB4568@ns1.tcbug.org> References: <200401130456.i0D4uf78051019@mail5.mx.voyager.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401130456.i0D4uf78051019@mail5.mx.voyager.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HD and MB selection? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:12:36 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:56:41PM -0500, Dragoncrest wrote: > Hi all. Just getting ready to build a new workstation using Freebsd 4.9 > (*and eventually 5.x once it reaches the classification of "stable") for > up at my job and I'm curious of what motherboard and hard drive would be > best to use under Freebsd for maximum compatibility with as few issues > as possible. Right now I'm looking at 3 different motherboards, > although I'm up for suggestions of other ones if these three really > aren't right for the job. > > MSI K7N2 Delta (nforce) > Asus A7N8X (nforce) > Asus A7V8X (via) > > Also, what brand of HD do you guys trust most? What works best with > Freebsd? I'm probubly going to pick up a pair of 80g Western Digitals, > but again I'm open to other suggestions. Any suggestions are greatly > apreciated. Thanks. > I'd go with the KT400a based board. I've had nothing but trouble mixing FreeBSD with nforce2 boards. As far as hard drives, one IDE drive is pretty much like another in my opinion. Josh Paetzel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 23:28:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5B216A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:28:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from zoot.lafn.org (zoot.lafn.ORG [206.117.18.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C81AE43D41 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:28:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (host-66-81-176-135.rev.o1.com [66.81.176.135]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.12.3p3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i0D7SpMF071649 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:28:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) In-Reply-To: <200309070002.15630.racerx@makeworld.com> References: <200309070002.15630.racerx@makeworld.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <21BAB730-459A-11D8-98C2-000393681B06@lafn.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Doug Hardie Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 23:28:50 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.609) Subject: INN Problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:28:55 -0000 I have sent the request below to the INN maillist but got no response. I have gotten nowhere trying to figure this out. Any help will be appreciated. I am running inn 2.4.0 and a few days ago postings by my users no longer get sent back to the news feed server. I have verified with them they are not receiving them from us. The postings are in the files here and can be seen by our users. Nothing apears in the outgoing file for the feed site. nntpsend.log shows the connections to the feed site, but nothing is ever sent. Traces of nnrpd and innd so no attempts to access the outgoing file. errlog, news.crit, and news.err are all empty. How can I find out what has gone wrong? Thanks, -- Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 00:31:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB6D416A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:31:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from web12823.mail.yahoo.com (web12823.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.174.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F340D43D46 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:31:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hallofdreams@yahoo.com.br) Message-ID: <20040113083118.31358.qmail@web12823.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.158.86.147] by web12823.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:31:18 ART Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:31:18 -0300 (ART) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Carvalho=20Paulo?= To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: XFree86 configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:31:19 -0000 Hello everyone, I just installed FreeBSD 4.9, and when I try to cofigure X through sysinstall it gives an error message in the end. The messege says that an error has ocurred and asks if I want to try again. I tried several times and then gave up. What I want to know is if there is any way that I can know what went wrong so that I can do it right. The error message does not give any clue as to what hapened. Thanks in advance for taking time to read this message and for a possible reply. Paulo de Carvalho. ______________________________________________________________________ Conheça a nova central de informações anti-spam do Yahoo! Mail: http://www.yahoo.com.br/antispam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 00:34:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4308716A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:34:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from SMTP.INTERPAY.NL (smtp.interpay.nl [193.78.119.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D3343D41 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:34:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from n.bulthuis@interpay.nl) Received: from SMM10004.INTERN.INTERPAY.NL (unverified) by SMTP.INTERPAY.NL (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.10) with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:34:08 +0100 Received: from SMM00001.intern.interpay.nl ([10.64.40.212]) by SMM10004.INTERN.INTERPAY.NL with Microsoft SMTPSVC (5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:34:08 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:34:08 +0100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: XFree86 configuration Thread-Index: AcPZr7mlW0Wtqr/qSoqe7O8PNwP2SAAADSug From: To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2004 08:34:08.0556 (UTC) FILETIME=[031316C0:01C3D9B0] Subject: RE: XFree86 configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:34:05 -0000 I always configure X with the xf86config program. Might be a bit basic, but= it gets the job done.=20 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@f= reebsd.org] On Behalf Of Carvalho Paulo Sent: 13 January 2004 09:31 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: XFree86 configuration Hello everyone, I just installed FreeBSD 4.9, and when I try to cofigure X through sysinstall it gives an error message in the end. The messege says that an error has ocurred and asks if I want to try again. I tried several times and then gave up. What I want to know is if there is any way that I can know what went wrong so that I can do it right. The error message does not give any clue as to what hapened. Thanks in advance for taking time to read this message and for a possible reply. Paulo de Carvalho. ______________________________________________________________________ Conhe=E7a a nova central de informa=E7=F5es anti-spam do Yahoo! Mail: http://www.yahoo.com.br/antispam _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------- Disclaimer: ' Aan de inhoud van dit bericht kunnen alleen rechten ten opzichte van Inte= rpay Nederland B.V. of aan haar gelieerde ondernemingen worden ontleend, in= dien zij door rechtsgeldig ondertekende stukken worden ondersteund. De info= rmatie in dit e-mailbericht is van vertrouwelijke aard en alleen bedoeld vo= or gebruik door de geadresseerde. Als u een bericht onbedoeld heeft ontvang= en, wordt u verzocht de verzender hiervan in kennis te stellen en het beric= ht te vernietigen zonder van de inhoud kennis te nemen, deze te vermenigvul= digen of andersoortig te gebruiken.'=20 An English version of this disclaimer is available on http://www.interpay.n= l/disclaimerenglish ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 00:39:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0580F16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:39:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns2.alphaque.com (ns2.alphaque.com [202.75.47.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85FA343D60 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:39:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: (qmail 5092 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jan 2004 08:39:20 -0000 Received: from lucifer.net-gw.com (HELO prophet.alphaque.com) (202.75.47.153) by lucifer.net-gw.com with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 08:39:20 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.alphaque.com [127.0.0.1]) by prophet.alphaque.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0D85Yac046174; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:05:34 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:05:34 +0800 (MYT) From: Dinesh Nair To: Jared Cheney In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040113160425.J336-100000@prophet.alphaque.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Trouble getting network card to work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:39:37 -0000 On Sat, 10 Jan 2004, Jared Cheney wrote: > The card is called pcn0 in FreeBSD, and it says that it is sharing IRQ > 10. Running tcpdump for any length of time also shows that 0 packets > were received by the filter. from the pcn(4) man page: pcn%d: chip is in D3 power state -- setting to D0 This message applies only to adapters which support power management. Some operating systems place the controller in low power mode when shutting down, and some PCI BIOSes fail to bring the chip out of this state before configuring it. The controller loses all of its PCI configuration in the D3 state, so if the BIOS does not set it back to full power mode in time, it will not be able to configure it correctly. The driver tries to detect this condi- tion and bring the adapter back to the D0 (full power) state, but this may not be enough to return the driver to a fully operational condition. If you see this message at boot time and the driver fails to attach the device as a network interface, you will have to perform a warm boot to have the device properly configured. could this be your problem then ? Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 00:39:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C597816A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:39:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns2.alphaque.com (ns2.alphaque.com [202.75.47.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C52F943D5E for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:39:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: (qmail 5089 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jan 2004 08:39:17 -0000 Received: from lucifer.net-gw.com (HELO prophet.alphaque.com) (202.75.47.153) by lucifer.net-gw.com with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 08:39:17 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.alphaque.com [127.0.0.1]) by prophet.alphaque.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0D8PPac046243; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:25:25 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:25:25 +0800 (MYT) From: Dinesh Nair To: John In-Reply-To: <20040112080420.A60685@starfire.mn.org> Message-ID: <20040113162021.V336-100000@prophet.alphaque.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with FreeBSD 4.8 on Compaq Armada M700 laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:39:37 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, John wrote: > Despite the fact that the laptop compatibility base has an entry for this > machine that looks good for FreeBSD 5.0, I'm not having the best luck > that one might hope. i've got an Armada M300, which shares a lot of the same underlying hardware as the M700 and have run FreeBSD on it since 4.4R. i'm now on 4.9R with all devices (sound, external cdrom and floppy, screen at 32bit depth) working fine and dandy. > Jan 11 17:56:56 pearl /kernel: acd0: CDROM at ata0-slave PIO > but I just get "device not configured" when I boot the GENERIC kernel > that was installed. /dev/acd0 does appear in the device directory, > and I ran MAKEDEV on it, just to make double sure. what kernel config file are you using ? > 2) APM also says "device not configured". Don't know if this works > with the MFS/installation kernel. i have just "device apm0" in me kernel, and it works fine and dandy. > 3) Even though xf86config seems to have correctly identified the adapter, > and it works nicely at 1024x768, I can't seem to get the color depth > working at anything other than 256. I have tried "startx -- -bpp 24" > and "startx -- -bpp 32" and "startx -- -bpp 16" but it doesn't seem to > matter. what's your XF86Config file like, especially your sync lines ? i'm using horizontal sync of 31.5-57.0 and a VerRefresh of 60. > Maybe I should try a binary upgrade to 4.9, now that it's out? I don't > currently have any reason to think that would help, but I haven't got > any other "go forward" ideas, either. i've had it working on my M300 on 4.8 as well, so 4.9 won't change anything. there's probably a misconfiguration in your kernel config (CDROM and APM) and X config files. Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 00:39:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3AD616A4CF for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:39:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns2.alphaque.com (ns2.alphaque.com [202.75.47.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1FF9443D5C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:39:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: (qmail 5081 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jan 2004 08:39:16 -0000 Received: from lucifer.net-gw.com (HELO prophet.alphaque.com) (202.75.47.153) by lucifer.net-gw.com with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 08:39:16 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.alphaque.com [127.0.0.1]) by prophet.alphaque.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0D8FQac046191; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:15:26 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:15:26 +0800 (MYT) From: Dinesh Nair To: David Miller In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040113161228.E336-100000@prophet.alphaque.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: routing to specific network X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:39:54 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, David Miller wrote: > Isn't this equivilent to selecting the outbound route? You want to > select 10.a.b.c uf you want the connection routed out ISP 1 and > 192.168.x.y otherwise. yes it is. > There are bizzare cases where it might make sense to try and load > balance two broadband connections, but they're really special cases and > don't have general purpose solutions:( and what i want to try doing is a bizarre case, load balancing without handling bgp. off the cuff, perhaps a hook or a netgraph node which round robins my source ip address over the two interfaces. of course, once a flow goes over one particular interface, it'd always use that interface till that connection is torn down. in cases where HTTP/1.1 is used without keep alives for example, each IMG could be pulled over a different interface, in effect multiplexing both connections. perhaps, i'll go read up on netgraph implementations and try something here. Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 00:48:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0271616A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:48:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from doos.cluecentral.net (cluecentral.net [193.109.122.221]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78CC543D1D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 00:48:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sabri@doos.cluecentral.net) Received: (qmail 60932 invoked by uid 1000); 13 Jan 2004 08:48:42 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:48:42 +0100 From: Sabri Berisha To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040113094842.A60440@cluecentral.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-NCC-RegID: nl.bit Subject: odd thing with make/gmake/su X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:48:45 -0000 Hi, I have an odd thing here. I have a very simple makefile: [root@doos root]# cat Makefile blah: @echo "hoi" @su sabri -c "echo hoi2" @echo "hoi3" @su sabri -c "echo hoi4" but when I do a make or gmake, I it gets a stop signal after the third command: [root@doos root]# make hoi hoi2 hoi3 [2]+ Stopped make [root@doos root]# fg make hoi4 [root@doos root]# I run 5.1-RELEASE-p11 on i386. Does anyone have a clue what is going on here? -- Sabri, "I route, therefore you are" Bescherm de digitale burgerrechten: http://www.bof.nl/donateur.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 01:01:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0822516A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:01:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.syd.swiftdsl.com.au (mail.syd.swiftdsl.com.au [202.154.83.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAEC943D69 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:01:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from deviledog@swiftdsl.com.au) Received: (qmail 5033 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2004 09:05:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (218.214.54.98) by mail.syd.swiftdsl.com.au with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 09:05:54 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <0CF73F22-45A7-11D8-A62D-000A95A55144@swiftdsl.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: FreeBSD-questions From: August Simonelli Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:01:18 +1100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.609) Subject: named.conf question (controls statement being ignored) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:01:32 -0000 Hi all, I've just installed bind9 from ports. I've got everything set up and the nameserver works except rndc. I've followed numerous instructions (bind howto, freebsd ezine) and still keep getting a strange error in my syslog. I won't post named.conf or rndc.conf yet as the error doesn't seem to point to them as being the problem. When i run /usr/sbin/named everything starts ok but i get: /etc/namedb/named.conf:102: Ignoring BIND 9 inet control clause in /var/log/messages my controls statement in named.conf is: controls { inet 127.0.0.1 allow { localhost; } keys { "mykey"; }; }; any thoughts? august From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 01:02:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F3D16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:02:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.syd.swiftdsl.com.au (mail.syd.swiftdsl.com.au [202.154.83.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C15843D2D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:02:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from deviledog@swiftdsl.com.au) Received: (qmail 5054 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2004 09:06:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (218.214.54.98) by mail.syd.swiftdsl.com.au with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 09:06:47 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <2F015412-45A7-11D8-A62D-000A95A55144@swiftdsl.com.au> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: August Simonelli Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:02:15 +1100 To: FreeBSD-questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.609) Subject: Re: /etc/rc.conf vs /etc/defaults/rc.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:02:19 -0000 On 13/01/2004, at 12:43 PM, Ted Suzman wrote: > Stuff you put in rc.conf overrides settings in /etc/defaults/rc.conf > > Never modify /etc/defaults/rc.conf > > -----Original Message----- > From: August Simonelli [mailto:deviledog@swiftdsl.com.au] > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 5:18 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: /etc/rc.conf vs /etc/defaults/rc.conf > > Hi all, > > I've looked in the handbook (and probably missed the explanation) but > am still a little confused. What's the difference between > these two rc.conf files? Both affect things, but what is best practice > for their use? > > Thank in advance, > > August > > PS I'm using 4.9 and realize some things may be differnet in 5.x ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Thanks all who helped me on this! I really do appreciate it! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 01:08:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB6316A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:08:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.webspacesolutions.com (ns1.webspacesolutions.com [216.74.11.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0219D43D1F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:08:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nick@webspacesolutions.com) Received: (qmail 23346 invoked by uid 507); 13 Jan 2004 08:56:11 -0000 Received: from nick@webspacesolutions.com by ns1.webspacesolutions.com by uid 504 with qmail-scanner-1.20rc1 (clamuko: 0.65. spamassassin: 2.55. Clear:RC:1:. Processed in 0.020186 secs); 13 Jan 2004 08:56:11 -0000 Received: from 24-205-247-185.ata-cres.charterpipeline.net (HELO beastie) (24.205.247.185) by mx1.webspacesolutions.com with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 08:56:10 -0000 From: "Nick Twaddell" To: "'August Simonelli'" , Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:08:35 -0800 Organization: Web Space Solutions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <0CF73F22-45A7-11D8-A62D-000A95A55144@swiftdsl.com.au> Thread-Index: AcPZsliT5TIrhKfCSmG/S6HMhfT1tQAAiI6Q X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Qmail-Scanner-Message-ID: <107398417163623341@ns1.webspacesolutions.com> Message-Id: <20040113090806.0219D43D1F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: RE: named.conf question (controls statement being ignored) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:08:07 -0000 This is my config... Named.conf key "rndc-key" { algorithm hmac-md5; secret "keyhashstuff"; }; controls { inet 127.0.0.1 port 953 allow { 127.0.0.1; } keys { "rndc-key"; }; }; Rndc.conf key "rndc-key" { algorithm hmac-md5; secret "keyhashstuff"; }; options { default-key "rndc-key"; default-server 127.0.0.1; default-port 953; }; Hopefully that will help :) -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of August Simonelli Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:01 AM To: FreeBSD-questions Subject: named.conf question (controls statement being ignored) Hi all, I've just installed bind9 from ports. I've got everything set up and the nameserver works except rndc. I've followed numerous instructions (bind howto, freebsd ezine) and still keep getting a strange error in my syslog. I won't post named.conf or rndc.conf yet as the error doesn't seem to point to them as being the problem. When i run /usr/sbin/named everything starts ok but i get: /etc/namedb/named.conf:102: Ignoring BIND 9 inet control clause in /var/log/messages my controls statement in named.conf is: controls { inet 127.0.0.1 allow { localhost; } keys { "mykey"; }; }; any thoughts? august _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 01:21:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0092016A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:21:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61F4C43D1D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:21:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp104-184.lns1.adl1.internode.on.net [150.101.104.184])i0D9LFxC090885; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:51:16 +1030 (CST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Malcolm Kay Organization: At home To: Charles Swiger , fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:51:15 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <410963BE-452F-11D8-A7A0-003065ABFD92@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <410963BE-452F-11D8-A7A0-003065ABFD92@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200401131951.15394.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: Re: set env editor global X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:21:23 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:13, Charles Swiger wrote: > On Jan 12, 2004, at 10:37 AM, fbsd_user wrote: > > On an new install with only an root account, I want to set the > > command line prompt prefix and the default editor for all new users > > and also the root account. > > > > What file do I put the 'set env' commands in to make this happen > > globally? > > Look at /etc/profile and /etc/csh.cshrc. > > [ Note that root has /bin/sh as it's shell, whereas normal users will > be using csh by default. This matters because different shells have > different syntax and config file locations. ] I believe your note is somewhat out of date. 4.x at least as far back as 4.1 has had /bin/csh (actually statically linked tcsh) as the default she= ll=20 for root. (But you possibly still end up with sh if you boot into single=20 user mode.) I don't know about 5.x, but would be a little surprised if the default ha= s reverted to sh. Malcolm Kay=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 01:24:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDCBA16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:24:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from munk.nu (mail.munk.nu [213.152.51.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB5243D48 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:24:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from munk@munk.nu) Received: from munk by munk.nu with local (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1AgKmb-000JBx-NP; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:24:21 +0000 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:24:21 +0000 From: Jez Hancock To: Doug Hardie Message-ID: <20040113092421.GA73594@users.munk.nu> Mail-Followup-To: Doug Hardie , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <63340-22004121311314124@M2W045.mail2web.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I need to resend messages from dead.letters X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:24:27 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 07:23:20PM -0800, Doug Hardie wrote: > There was a problem last night with my mail server and a bunch of mail > went into the dead.letters mailbox rather than being sent. I have that > mailbox and need a way to send all of those messages. I split them out > into individual files, but there are just too many to send by hand. Is > there a way to cause them all to be resent? Look at the -f option to the mail command - see the manpage for mail(1) for more info. -- Jez Hancock - System Administrator / PHP Developer http://munk.nu/ http://jez.hancock-family.com/ - personal weblog http://ipfwstats.sf.net/ - ipfw peruser traffic logging From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 01:32:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F1416A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:32:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-119-53-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5876043D2D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:32:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E5C0266C4F; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:32:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:32:02 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: BSD baby Message-ID: <20040113093202.GA26656@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040113045628.GA65497@mail.hitmedia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jRHKVT23PllUwdXP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040113045628.GA65497@mail.hitmedia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: if a file is used a lot, does it stay in a RAM cache? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:32:04 -0000 --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 08:56:28PM -0800, BSD baby wrote: > If a file is loaded off the hard drive a lot, does FreeBSD keep it in RAM? Yes (assuming you have free RAM). Kris --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAA7sSWry0BWjoQKURAqKjAJ9pTjesygJhitYGTzGEVj59VrII8ACfYu8J Q0toF5//UKGa8lROINGEo2U= =5iEE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jRHKVT23PllUwdXP-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 01:32:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70A116A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:32:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-67-119-53-122.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7993443D5C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:32:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3084B66C4F; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:32:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:32:46 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Michael A. Alestock" Message-ID: <20040113093246.GB26656@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040113012652.O6773@bsd.maa-net.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040113012652.O6773@bsd.maa-net.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Errors in upgrading ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:32:49 -0000 --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:37:25AM -0500, Michael A. Alestock wrote: > I get numerous errors while trying to, "portsdb -Uu", 'portversion -l "<", > and "portupgrade -arR". I don't get any kind of prompt to change anythi= ng. > How would I go about fixing these errors so that I can upgrade my ports t= o the latest > version(s)?? Here's a snippet from the PORTUPGRADE I did, but it stopped > after coming up in error.... >=20 > Stop in /usr/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer. You chopped out the error! Kris --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAA7s9Wry0BWjoQKURAq/LAJ4i3/LO03czKuCA7Y7hD4U/IyIsGACg57WN 9LvEBlzI0pPxjCTZcWUPTSk= =jBqb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4SFOXa2GPu3tIq4H-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 01:35:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF4516A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:35:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.syd.swiftdsl.com.au (mail.syd.swiftdsl.com.au [202.154.83.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6EAAC43D49 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:35:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from deviledog@swiftdsl.com.au) Received: (qmail 6017 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2004 09:40:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (218.214.54.98) by mail.syd.swiftdsl.com.au with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 09:40:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20040113090806.0219D43D1F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> References: <20040113090806.0219D43D1F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: August Simonelli Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:35:23 +1100 To: "Nick Twaddell" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.609) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: named.conf question (controls statement being ignored) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:35:35 -0000 Thanks Nick ... I'm feeling a little silly now ... I was starting the wrong version of BIND ... need to be a little more careful with my rtfm'ing! august On 13/01/2004, at 8:08 PM, Nick Twaddell wrote: > This is my config... > > Named.conf > key "rndc-key" { > algorithm hmac-md5; > secret "keyhashstuff"; > }; > controls { > inet 127.0.0.1 port 953 > allow { 127.0.0.1; } keys { "rndc-key"; }; > }; > > Rndc.conf > key "rndc-key" { > algorithm hmac-md5; > secret "keyhashstuff"; > }; > options { > default-key "rndc-key"; > default-server 127.0.0.1; > default-port 953; > }; > > Hopefully that will help :) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of August > Simonelli > Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:01 AM > To: FreeBSD-questions > Subject: named.conf question (controls statement being ignored) > > Hi all, > > I've just installed bind9 from ports. I've got everything set up and > the nameserver works except rndc. I've followed numerous instructions > (bind howto, freebsd ezine) and still keep getting a strange error in > my syslog. I won't post named.conf or rndc.conf yet as the error > doesn't seem to point to them as being the problem. When i run > /usr/sbin/named everything starts ok but i get: > > /etc/namedb/named.conf:102: Ignoring BIND 9 inet control clause > > in /var/log/messages > > my controls statement in named.conf is: > > controls { > inet 127.0.0.1 allow { localhost; } keys { "mykey"; }; > }; > > any thoughts? > > august > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 01:44:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B362116A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:44:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from jive.SoftHome.net (jive.SoftHome.net [66.54.152.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2CDE443D39 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:44:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from larrykh465@SoftHome.net) Received: (qmail 13092 invoked by uid 417); 13 Jan 2004 09:43:59 -0000 Received: from shunt-smtp-out-0 (HELO softhome.net) (172.16.3.12) by shunt-smtp-out-0 with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 09:43:59 -0000 Received: from 192.168.0.101 ([207.225.244.13]) (AUTH: LOGIN larrykh465@softhome.net) by softhome.net with esmtp; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:43:58 -0700 From: Larry Hammer To: twistfire@rambler.ru Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:41:16 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401130141.17800.larrykh465@SoftHome.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xmms - problem - how to fix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:44:01 -0000 > I have some problem with my xmms mm player. When I'm treing to > listen some mp3's it gives me aN error, that I don't know how to fix. > I have KDE 3.1 if you need this info ^) > So here it is: > bash-2.05b$ xmms > /dev/dsp: Device busy > /dev/dsp: Device busy > /* with OSS driver */ > > ** WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): Device busy > > ** WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): Device busy > > ** WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): Device busy > /dev/dsp: Device busy I am also using XMMS in KDE3.1 in order to get XMMS to work from iether the Konsol cmd line or the menu ARTS plugin had to be installed and selected OSS plugin would not work while KDE running. hope this helps Larry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 02:13:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D27E116A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:13:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.heronetwork.com (mail.heronetwork.com [216.254.62.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476B443D2F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:13:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sandshrimp@comcast.net) Received: by mx1.heronetwork.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id B0CE0A4B22; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:13:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from comcast.net (12-228-104-137.client.attbi.com [12.228.104.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.heronetwork.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175E0A4C4D; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:13:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4003C4EA.2080301@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:14:02 -0800 From: "W. Ryan Merrick" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031218 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anish Mistry References: <5.2.1.1.0.20040112155511.00aab178@pop.courtesymortgage.com> <200401121950.48946.mistry.7@osu.edu> In-Reply-To: <200401121950.48946.mistry.7@osu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on nott.heronetwork.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: Jason Williams Subject: Re: Cyrus-imapd2 installed through ports question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:13:47 -0000 Anish Mistry wrote: > On Monday 12 January 2004 06:59 pm, Jason Williams wrote: > >>Hello everyone. >> >>I was having a problem after I installed cyrus-imapd2 through the ports > > tree. > >>Everything on the installation went well. However, im seeing a error pop > > up > >>in my log that I cannot figure out. >>Thus, I thought i'd ask here, see if anyone had any similiar problems. >> >>Note, this is on a FreeBSD 4.9 box: >>Cyrus-imapd-2.1.16 >>Cyrus-sasl-2.1.17 >>BerkeleyDB-4.1.25 >> >>This is from my /var/log/auth.log >> >> >>>Jan 5 23:54:39 obsidianbox imapd[8015]: OTP unavailable because can't >>>read/write key database /etc/opiekeys: Permission denied >>>Jan 5 23:54:43 obsidianbox imapd[8015]: no user in db > > I get this too in my logs, but the user is still there, and found by the > operation that tries to find the user, and everything still seems to work, > so I ignore it and chalk it up to a cyrus bug. > Hello, How did you configure sasl? If you by chance include sql support you will get log messages like this and more when you add users to the sasl DB. Auxprop is looking in the sql databases and other places first. If you are getting authenticated, that is all that matters. -- -Ryan Merrick sandshrimp@comcast.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 02:24:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F7616A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:24:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.heronetwork.com (mail.heronetwork.com [216.254.62.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AAE043D2D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:24:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sandshrimp@comcast.net) Received: by mx1.heronetwork.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 2115AA5220; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:24:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from comcast.net (12-228-104-137.client.attbi.com [12.228.104.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.heronetwork.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 995E1A4E9F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:24:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4003C777.8050401@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:24:55 -0800 From: "W. Ryan Merrick" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031218 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <3FFFE957.4010901@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <3FFFE957.4010901@comcast.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on nott.heronetwork.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 Subject: Re: Cyrrus-imap with generic error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:24:39 -0000 W. Ryan Merrick wrote: > hello, > > I have been fighting this for a while. I am trying to setup > Postfix-2.0.16+cyrus-Imap-2.1.16_1+cyrus-sasl-2.1.17_1 on my FreeBSD 4.9 > Stable server's inside NIC. > > Postfix is configured with: sasl2, TLS, BDB_ver 40 > cyrus-imapd2' => '--with-sasl --with-openssl WITH_BDB_VER=4' > cyrus-sasl2' => '--with-openssl WITH_BDB_VER=4 --enable-auth-sasldb > --enable-login' > > Postfix runs fine by itself It complains that: > > Jan 10 02:47:22 c1529030-a postfix/pipe[35530]: 51BDF4113: > to=, orig_to=, relay=cyrus, > delay=9701, status=deferred (temporary failure. Command output: couldn't > connect to lmtpd: Connection refused_ 421 4.3.0 deliver: couldn't > connect to lmtpd_ ) > > I know that the lmtpd socket is also handled by cyrus imap to deliver > the mail to the cyrus mailboxes that the admin sets up in cyradm. > > #ll /var/imap/socket/ > srwxrwxrwx 1 root cyrus 0 Jan 10 03:17 lmtp > > Sasl has two users one admin and one user with passwords > #sasldblistusers2 > admin@attbi.com: userPassword > wrmine@attbi.com: userPassword > > When I run /usr/local/cyrus/bin/master > > I get this output in /var/log/cyrus.imap > Jan 10 03:27:09 c1529030-a master[39752]: process started > Jan 10 03:27:09 c1529030-a master[39753]: about to exec > /usr/local/cyrus/bin/ctl_cyrusdb > Jan 10 03:27:09 c1529030-a ctl_cyrusdb[39753]: recovering cyrus databases > Jan 10 03:27:09 c1529030-a ctl_cyrusdb[39753]: done recovering cyrus > databases > Jan 10 03:27:09 c1529030-a master[39752]: servname not supported for > ai_socktype, disabling lmtp > Jan 10 03:27:09 c1529030-a master[39752]: ready for work > Jan 10 03:27:09 c1529030-a master[39754]: about to exec > /usr/local/cyrus/bin/ctl_cyrusdb > Jan 10 03:27:09 c1529030-a ctl_cyrusdb[39754]: checkpointing cyrus > databases > Jan 10 03:27:09 c1529030-a ctl_cyrusdb[39754]: archiving database file: > /var/imap/mailboxes.db > Jan 10 03:27:09 c1529030-a ctl_cyrusdb[39754]: archiving log file: > /var/imap/db/log.0000000001 > Jan 10 03:27:09 c1529030-a ctl_cyrusdb[39754]: archiving log file: > /var/imap/db/log.0000000001 > Jan 10 03:27:09 c1529030-a ctl_cyrusdb[39754]: done checkpointing cyrus > databases > Jan 10 03:27:09 c1529030-a master[39752]: process 39754 exited, status 0 > > > When I attempt to access cyradmin with: > cyradm --user admin -auth plain cell.attbi.com > > I get a high volume of repeating logs. (about 20 lines a second) > > Jan 10 03:30:51 c1529030-a imap[39987]: executed > Jan 10 03:30:51 c1529030-a imapd[39987]: SASL failed initializing: > sasl_server_init(): generic failure > Jan 10 03:30:51 c1529030-a master[39752]: process 39987 exited, status 1 > Jan 10 03:30:51 c1529030-a master[39988]: about to exec > /usr/local/cyrus/bin/imapd > > Until I kill master. At which point I get my login prompt. > > #cyradm --user admin -auth plain cell.attbi.com > IMAP Password:Broken pipe > > I have googled everything I from the logs with no hints. > I dont know where I went wrong. I have tried cvsuping and rebuilding all > the packages a few times in the last month. > > Configs and files follow Found the problem I was having in sasl.h The config files in #/usr/local/lib/sasl2 need to be readonly. -- -Ryan Merrick sandshrimp@comcast.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 02:33:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0C916A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:33:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA56943D3F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:33:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0DAZNo9057810; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:35:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0DAZMYL057809; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:35:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ei.bzerk.org: bulk set sender to mail25@bzerk.org using -f Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:35:22 +0100 From: Ruben de Groot To: Brent Wiese Message-ID: <20040113103522.GA57681@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Brent Wiese , 'Ian Barnes' , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040113012232.MPNJ27510.fed1mtao02.cox.net@SAMBA> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040113012232.MPNJ27510.fed1mtao02.cox.net@SAMBA> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mail in a Jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:33:51 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 06:20:17PM -0700, Brent Wiese typed: > > Hi, > > > > I run my web sites from a jail. The time has come that i now > > need to send an > > email from one of those sites using the mail() function in php. > > > > I would like to know, what files do i need to be able to send > > mail from the > > jail using the mail command. The box is using sendmail as its > > mta, and is > > running 4.9 release. This configuration (sendmail + php in a jail) should work out-of-the-box. It does on all our servers (4.8 - 5.2). What kind of problems are you experiencing? Ruben > This plagued me too. I found a very easy solution: esmtp in the ports. > > A few catches: > > 1: You need an external SMTP server that will relay the mail for you. I was > unable to get it to talk to the main host's SMTP, probably a "feature" of > jailing... Luckily, I have another box on the LAN who's sole purpose is to > relay mail for machines on the LAN. > > 2: After you install esmtp, change your sendmail links (/usr/sbin/sendmail > at least I think) to point at it. > > 3: If you compiled PHP w/ a non-existent sendmail, you have to recompile. > It's a little confusing, but if you dig far enough in the docs, mail() will > not compile if sendmail doesn't exist (it tests). > > Enjoy! > Brent > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 02:34:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A6A16A4CF for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:34:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.heronetwork.com (mail.heronetwork.com [216.254.62.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F086B43D3F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:34:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sandshrimp@comcast.net) Received: by mx1.heronetwork.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 638B7A4FC6; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:34:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from comcast.net (12-228-104-137.client.attbi.com [12.228.104.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.heronetwork.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CC1A4F3C; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:34:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4003C9D9.6080803@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:35:05 -0800 From: "W. Ryan Merrick" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031218 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mcabanatuan@wi.rr.com References: <21243121427e.21427e212431@rdc-kc.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <21243121427e.21427e212431@rdc-kc.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on nott.heronetwork.com X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD hangs on boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:34:53 -0000 mcabanatuan@wi.rr.com wrote: > I just recently got an old HP NetServer LH Plus > (specs): > Pentium 166MHz (dual processor board with single cpu) > 128MB of RAM (DIMM's) > Mylex DAC960 RAID controller > 5x 4.2GB SCSI RAID5 array. > -- > > At any rate, I've tried using my 4.3-RELEASE, 5.1-RELEASE cd's but those fail to even load due to a fault in the loader. I managed to find my 5.0-DP1 CD and gave that a shot, and low and behold the boot loader worked, it managed to find a driver for the SCSI drives (including the cdrom), and to my surprise the RAID controller as well. > > To give you a little background, basically any *nix based OS I have tried fails to install due to not having a driver or a working driver for the RAID controller, so no block device shows up as being able to installed on to. 5.0-DP1 was the first thing that worked. Even NetBSD with their claim of being able to run on anything fails to install. > > Ok so now the problem, pardon the winded explanation. I successfully created paritions and mount points and installed a system to them. Finished install, removed the CD, rebooted, and that ended that pretty much. Aftter it get's past loading up the BIOS and initializing the system, the loader comes up for me to push 'F1' to load FreeBSD. I do that and all I get is a system beep. Nothing loads, nothing happens, and I am able to keep pushing F1 with more beeps. No errors, no loading of anything, no nothin. > > Is there a way I can force error messages to see what the problem is, or to get the machine to boot? Questions? Comments? Suggestions? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hello, The partition size in the RAID BIOS should be set to 2GB for use with freebsd. Also look for BIOS and Firmware upgrades from mylex to improve performance and reliability. -- -Ryan Merrick sandshrimp@comcast.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 02:35:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B3F816A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:35:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from wopr.ife.no (wopr.ife.no [128.39.4.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E26043D31 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 02:35:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steinms@wopr.ife.no) Received: from wopr.ife.no (sagan.ife.no [128.39.226.253]) by wopr.ife.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA22100 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:35:03 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4003C9D7.5040706@wopr.ife.no> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:35:03 +0100 From: sms User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030811 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ImageMagic port build fails (again). X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: stein@ife.no List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:35:15 -0000 Hi, fyi Did a ports upgrade on a FreeBSD4.8 system 01/13/04 10:50am GMT+1. The reason for this upgrade was to test newer versions of ImageMagic, because of problems with the one currently installed (PACKAGE_LIB_VERSION_NUMBER="5,5,7,2"). It fails in the resize function (used in conjunction with Zope and the Zope product Photo. Photo uses ImageMagic) A build of ImageMagic-5.5.7-14 fails as follows: ----------------------------- snip ---------------------- /bin/sh ../libtool --silent --mode=compile cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../ -I. -I. -I../magick -I.. -I.. -I../magick -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/X11 -I/usr/local/include/libxml2 -O -pipe -Wall -c -o jp2.lo `test -f 'jp2.c' || echo './'`jp2.c In file included from /usr/local/include/jasper/jasper.h:121, from jp2.c:85: /usr/local/include/jasper/jas_image.h:152: warning: `/*' within comment jp2.c: In function `ReadJP2Image': jp2.c:343: warning: implicit declaration of function `jas_clrspc_fam' jp2.c:343: warning: implicit declaration of function `jas_image_clrspc' jp2.c:345: `JAS_CLRSPC_FAM_RGB' undeclared (first use in this function) jp2.c:345: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once jp2.c:345: for each function it appears in.) jp2.c:348: `JAS_CLRSPC_CHANIND_RGB_R' undeclared (first use in this function) jp2.c:350: `JAS_CLRSPC_CHANIND_RGB_G' undeclared (first use in this function) jp2.c:352: `JAS_CLRSPC_CHANIND_RGB_B' undeclared (first use in this function) jp2.c:369: `JAS_CLRSPC_FAM_GRAY' undeclared (first use in this function) jp2.c:372: `JAS_CLRSPC_CHANIND_GRAY_Y' undeclared (first use in this function) jp2.c:382: `JAS_CLRSPC_FAM_YCBCR' undeclared (first use in this function) jp2.c:347: warning: unreachable code at beginning of switch statement jp2.c: In function `WriteJP2Image': jp2.c:760: warning: implicit declaration of function `jas_image_setclrspc' jp2.c:760: `JAS_CLRSPC_SGRAY' undeclared (first use in this function) jp2.c:762: `JAS_CLRSPC_CHANIND_GRAY_Y' undeclared (first use in this function) jp2.c:769: `JAS_CLRSPC_SRGB' undeclared (first use in this function) jp2.c:771: `JAS_CLRSPC_CHANIND_RGB_R' undeclared (first use in this function) jp2.c:773: `JAS_CLRSPC_CHANIND_RGB_G' undeclared (first use in this function) jp2.c:775: `JAS_CLRSPC_CHANIND_RGB_B' undeclared (first use in this function) gmake[1]: *** [jp2.lo] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/graphics/ImageMagick/work/ImageMagick-5.5.7/coders' gmake: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/ImageMagick. --------------------------------------------------------------------- --sms /* Stein M Sandbech Email: stein@ife.no ** ** Senior Systems Engineer, EDP dept Web site: www.ife.no ** ** Institute for Energy Technology Tel: +47 63 80 60 00 ** ** Box 40, N-2007 Kjeller, NORWAY Fax: +47 63 81 11 68 */ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 03:18:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E905F16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:18:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from hiwatt.lognet.ch (hiwatt.lognet.ch [195.141.214.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE8D43D5E for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:18:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from meier@logmail.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hiwatt.lognet.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F16F246E05 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:18:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from hiwatt.lognet.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hiwatt.lognet.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 05798-01-8 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:18:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from hiwatt.lognet.ch (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hiwatt.lognet.ch (Postfix) with SMTP id 3C605246DCE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:18:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from firewalli.lognet.ch ([195.141.214.38]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user meier.logmail) by hiwatt.lognet.ch with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:18:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <64287.195.141.214.38.1073992712.squirrel@hiwatt.lognet.ch> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:18:32 +0100 (CET) From: "David Meier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: How "safe" is 5.2 to use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:18:42 -0000 Hello list, I am relatively new to the world of FreeBSD. But first, congrats to the new release! I am somewhat insecure on how trustfully I can use the new release for my intended use (and I hope my questions haven't been posted a zillion times before). Therefore I hope the FreeBSD nuts can advise me whether to go for 4.9 or 5.2. The setup: hardware: DELL PowerEdge 1750 (Dual XEON, 2GB RAM, RAID 1). web server: Apache 2.0, MySQL 4.0, PHP 4.3.4, Perl 5.8 mail server: Postfix, Cyrus IMAPd, Cyrus SASL, Amavis-new, SpamAssassin, ClamAV The servers will be used for virtual hosting as a small ISP evironment and housed about 30min from where I work (in case I have to reset them...). I don't know how and if the instability risks may affect such a setup of services on the hardware described. Unfortunately, the advisories are kept in pretty general language, however, I know it is hard to predict how it will be running on a particular system. I just don't know FreeBSD well enough to have a 'feel' about it (although I don't rely too much on 'feelings' in the world of computers). Is upgrading to 5.2 comparable to, say, I upgrade from RedHat 9 to RedHat's newest release? What I like about the 5.x releases is the possibility of taking file system snapshots, for example to back up the mailboxes. Thanks for all input. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 03:34:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460EA16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:34:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from etrn2.doruk.net.tr (etrn2.doruk.net.tr [212.58.5.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16AF243D2F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:34:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vahric@doruk.net.tr) Received: from mail.doruk.net.tr ([212.58.5.6] helo=doruk.net.tr) by etrn2.doruk.net.tr with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AgMuG-0001db-EP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:40:24 +0200 Received: from [212.58.13.17] (account vahric HELO VAHOXP) by doruk.net.tr (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 71747820 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:40:29 +0200 From: "Vahric MUHTARYAN" To: Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:34:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Thread-Index: AcPZyTJpT80uPbteRZuDo2Lw40iI3w== Message-ID: Subject: Whan can I do if OS does not boot after makeworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:34:45 -0000 Hi Everybody , I heared in list and some sites that some times after makeworld system can't boot . I wonder What FreeBSD Admins make to solve this problem . Does possbile to prevent this problem ?! Any way ?! Vahric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 03:46:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 896B816A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:46:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from etrn2.doruk.net.tr (etrn2.doruk.net.tr [212.58.5.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9045343D41 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:46:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vahric@doruk.net.tr) Received: from mail.doruk.net.tr ([212.58.5.6] helo=doruk.net.tr) by etrn2.doruk.net.tr with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AgN5Q-0002Ft-Co; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:51:56 +0200 Received: from [212.58.13.17] (account vahric HELO VAHOXP) by doruk.net.tr (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 71751279; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:51:54 +0200 From: "Vahric MUHTARYAN" To: "'David Meier'" Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:45:49 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <64287.195.141.214.38.1073992712.squirrel@hiwatt.lognet.ch> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Thread-Index: AcPZyANiImb2lvr3Ql2txy88b1wLjgAAg3mg Message-ID: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: How "safe" is 5.2 to use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:46:10 -0000 Hi , You have to use FreeBSD 4.9, because you can see in freebsd web page prodcution version is 4.9. and please test it maybe you will see you can not install 5.2 on your hardware because when I try to install 5.1 on my intel platform I faced a problem then now I'm using 4.9 . Everybody will say that wait until more tested version and now its 4.9 I didn't make a any update but suggested update mechanism is update in seris for example 4.8 to 4.9 , but maybe problem can occur when you jump 4 to 5 . I asked this question before and this is my knowledge what the list say . Vahric -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of David Meier Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:19 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: How "safe" is 5.2 to use? Hello list, I am relatively new to the world of FreeBSD. But first, congrats to the new release! I am somewhat insecure on how trustfully I can use the new release for my intended use (and I hope my questions haven't been posted a zillion times before). Therefore I hope the FreeBSD nuts can advise me whether to go for 4.9 or 5.2. The setup: hardware: DELL PowerEdge 1750 (Dual XEON, 2GB RAM, RAID 1). web server: Apache 2.0, MySQL 4.0, PHP 4.3.4, Perl 5.8 mail server: Postfix, Cyrus IMAPd, Cyrus SASL, Amavis-new, SpamAssassin, ClamAV The servers will be used for virtual hosting as a small ISP evironment and housed about 30min from where I work (in case I have to reset them...). I don't know how and if the instability risks may affect such a setup of services on the hardware described. Unfortunately, the advisories are kept in pretty general language, however, I know it is hard to predict how it will be running on a particular system. I just don't know FreeBSD well enough to have a 'feel' about it (although I don't rely too much on 'feelings' in the world of computers). Is upgrading to 5.2 comparable to, say, I upgrade from RedHat 9 to RedHat's newest release? What I like about the 5.x releases is the possibility of taking file system snapshots, for example to back up the mailboxes. Thanks for all input. Dave. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 03:51:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D11216A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:51:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBAE443D6E for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:51:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i0DBkUi22294; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:46:30 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: stein@ife.no, sms , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:46:30 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <4003C9D7.5040706@wopr.ife.no> In-Reply-To: <4003C9D7.5040706@wopr.ife.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401130346.30178.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: ImageMagic port build fails (again). X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:51:40 -0000 On Tuesday 13 January 2004 02:35 am, sms wrote: > Hi, fyi > > Did a ports upgrade on a FreeBSD4.8 system > 01/13/04 10:50am GMT+1. > > The reason for this upgrade was to test newer versions of > ImageMagic, because of problems with the one currently installed > (PACKAGE_LIB_VERSION_NUMBER="5,5,7,2"). > > It fails in the resize function (used in conjunction with Zope and > the Zope product Photo. Photo uses ImageMagic) > > A build of ImageMagic-5.5.7-14 fails as follows: Did you update jasper? Since I have -14 installed, it looks like you have some out of date dependancies that have to be upgrade before ImageMagick can be. Kent > > ----------------------------- snip ---------------------- > /bin/sh ../libtool --silent --mode=compile cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../ -I. > -I. -I../magick -I.. -I.. -I../magick -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 > -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/X11 > -I/usr/local/include/libxml2 -O -pipe -Wall -c -o jp2.lo `test -f > 'jp2.c' || echo './'`jp2.c > In file included from /usr/local/include/jasper/jasper.h:121, > from jp2.c:85: > /usr/local/include/jasper/jas_image.h:152: warning: `/*' within comment > jp2.c: In function `ReadJP2Image': > jp2.c:343: warning: implicit declaration of function `jas_clrspc_fam' > jp2.c:343: warning: implicit declaration of function `jas_image_clrspc' > jp2.c:345: `JAS_CLRSPC_FAM_RGB' undeclared (first use in this function) > jp2.c:345: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > jp2.c:345: for each function it appears in.) > jp2.c:348: `JAS_CLRSPC_CHANIND_RGB_R' undeclared (first use in this > function) > jp2.c:350: `JAS_CLRSPC_CHANIND_RGB_G' undeclared (first use in this > function) > jp2.c:352: `JAS_CLRSPC_CHANIND_RGB_B' undeclared (first use in this > function) > jp2.c:369: `JAS_CLRSPC_FAM_GRAY' undeclared (first use in this function) > jp2.c:372: `JAS_CLRSPC_CHANIND_GRAY_Y' undeclared (first use in this > function) > jp2.c:382: `JAS_CLRSPC_FAM_YCBCR' undeclared (first use in this function) > jp2.c:347: warning: unreachable code at beginning of switch statement > jp2.c: In function `WriteJP2Image': > jp2.c:760: warning: implicit declaration of function `jas_image_setclrspc' > jp2.c:760: `JAS_CLRSPC_SGRAY' undeclared (first use in this function) > jp2.c:762: `JAS_CLRSPC_CHANIND_GRAY_Y' undeclared (first use in this > function) > jp2.c:769: `JAS_CLRSPC_SRGB' undeclared (first use in this function) > jp2.c:771: `JAS_CLRSPC_CHANIND_RGB_R' undeclared (first use in this > function) > jp2.c:773: `JAS_CLRSPC_CHANIND_RGB_G' undeclared (first use in this > function) > jp2.c:775: `JAS_CLRSPC_CHANIND_RGB_B' undeclared (first use in this > function) > gmake[1]: *** [jp2.lo] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory > `/usr/ports/graphics/ImageMagick/work/ImageMagick-5.5.7/coders' > gmake: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > *** Error code 2 > > Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/ImageMagick. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > --sms > > /* Stein M Sandbech Email: stein@ife.no ** > ** Senior Systems Engineer, EDP dept Web site: www.ife.no ** > ** Institute for Energy Technology Tel: +47 63 80 60 00 ** > ** Box 40, N-2007 Kjeller, NORWAY Fax: +47 63 81 11 68 */ > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 03:56:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B623616A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:56:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB5D43D67 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 03:56:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i0DBtpfn034620 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:55:51 GMT (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i0DBtolB034619; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:55:50 GMT (envelope-from matthew) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:55:50 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman To: Rishi Chopra Message-ID: <20040113115550.GB23956@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Rishi Chopra , questions@freebsd.org References: <4003126E.5030107@cal.berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4003126E.5030107@cal.berkeley.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD, SSH and "Enter Authentication Response" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:56:21 -0000 --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 01:32:30PM -0800, Rishi Chopra wrote: > I have a nitpicky question about logging into a FreeBSD machine and=20 > SSH. I'm using a minimal FreeBSD install and SSH Secure Shell client=20 > v3.2.0 - the crux of the problem is I am unable to "smoothly" login. Which FreeBSD version? And are you running the OpenSSH server supplied with the system or one from ports? > When I login to my machine, I'm prompted to enter an "authentication=20 > response". A window is displayed with "Enter Authentication Response"=20 > in the title bar, and two buttons at the bottom ('OK' and 'Cancel') -=20 > the text says: >=20 > Enter your authentication response. > Password: Sounds like you've got the PAM based challenge-response authentication enabled in your /etc/ssh/sshd_config (which is the default), but your /etc/pam.conf (FreeBSD 4.x) or /etc/pam.d (FreeBSD 5.x) has a modified configuration. Here are a couple of things to try -- Turn off Challenge-response authentication in /etc/ssh/sshd_config=20 Change: #ChallengeResponseAuthentication yes to ChallengeResponseAuthentication no and then: # kill -HUP `cat /var/run/sshd.pid` to get it to reread the config. -- or -- Double check the PAM settings: they should look like this in /etc/pam.conf # OpenSSH with PAM support requires similar modules. The session one is # a bit strange, though... sshd auth sufficient pam_skey.so sshd auth sufficient pam_opie.so no_fake= _prompts #sshd auth requisite pam_opieaccess.so #sshd auth sufficient pam_kerberosIV.so try_fir= st_pass #sshd auth sufficient pam_krb5.so try_fir= st_pass sshd auth required pam_unix.so try_fir= st_pass sshd account required pam_unix.so sshd password required pam_permit.so sshd session required pam_permit.so The /etc/pam.d case is similar, except you should have a file called 'sshd' in that directory, whose contents are similar, but without the 'sshd' entries in the first column. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAA9zGdtESqEQa7a0RAo/gAJ4ym4hYGJY0JvzxbBbiEjbFYt1mkQCfY/TC AE2cAnC54HtgoButEg+flx4= =dvcn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZfOjI3PrQbgiZnxM-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 04:02:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1259616A4CE; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:02:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.pelleg.org (gw.pelleg.org [205.201.13.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2DA43D3F; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:02:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from daniel+bsd@pelleg.org) Received: from lank.here (lank.wburn [192.168.3.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "gw.pelleg.org", Issuer "Dan Pelleg" (verified OK)) by gw.pelleg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26775A53; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:02:45 -0500 (EST) Received: by lank.here (Postfix, from userid 7675) id 57851147; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:02:42 -0500 (EST) To: Ernst de Haan References: <200401121441.05186.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> <20040112205042.GA44664@madras.dyndns.org> <200401121459.47773.ecrist@adtechintegrated.com> <200401122208.52253.znerd@FreeBSD.org> From: Dan Pelleg Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:02:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200401122208.52253.znerd@FreeBSD.org> (Ernst de Haan's message of "Mon, 12 Jan 2004 22:08:52 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: ecrist@adtechintegrated.com cc: Gautam Gopalakrishnan cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mounting as non-root? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:02:49 -0000 Ernst de Haan writes: > Eric, > > Use amd, the auto-mounting daemon. See: > > http://www.daemonnews.org/200202/automounting.html > > Let me know how this works for you. I've got some problems with it, probably > mainly due to an Audio CD program getting in the way. > > Ernst > > And in particular, for CF cards: http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200305/cfmount.html -- Dan Pelleg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 04:14:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254C916A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:14:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47DC543D49 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:14:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0DCGNo9058671; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:16:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0DCGNs8058670; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:16:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ei.bzerk.org: bulk set sender to mail25@bzerk.org using -f Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:16:23 +0100 From: Ruben de Groot To: John Message-ID: <20040113121623.GB57681@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , John , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040112230938.A62891@starfire.mn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040112230938.A62891@starfire.mn.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating DNS after DHCP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:14:36 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:09:38PM -0600, John typed: > I see that some Microsoft systems send out an update to DNS with > the system name. I configured my DNS server to accept these updates, > but now that I'm running FreeBSD on a laptop - how do I do that > from FreeBSD? I've looked at the dhclient man pages and the named > man pages and the pages that they refer to and I didn't pick up > any hints there. > > Can anyone give me a clue? (Yeah - I'm clueless...) I believe this is done by the nsupdate(8) program. Ruben > Thanks! > -- > > John Lind > john@starfire.MN.ORG > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 04:18:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A774916A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:18:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE90343D55 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:18:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i0DCIgfn051708 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:18:42 GMT (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i0DCIffO051610; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:18:41 GMT (envelope-from matthew) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:18:41 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman To: Doug Hardie , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040113121841.GC23956@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Doug Hardie , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <63340-22004121311314124@M2W045.mail2web.com> <20040113092421.GA73594@users.munk.nu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="R+My9LyyhiUvIEro" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040113092421.GA73594@users.munk.nu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: I need to resend messages from dead.letters X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:18:49 -0000 --R+My9LyyhiUvIEro Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:24:21AM +0000, Jez Hancock wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 07:23:20PM -0800, Doug Hardie wrote: > > There was a problem last night with my mail server and a bunch of mail= =20 > > went into the dead.letters mailbox rather than being sent. I have that= =20 > > mailbox and need a way to send all of those messages. I split them out= =20 > > into individual files, but there are just too many to send by hand. Is= =20 > > there a way to cause them all to be resent? > Look at the -f option to the mail command - see the manpage for mail(1) > for more info. Hmmm.. I don't think that's quite what the OP wanted. One solution is to install the procmail port (ports: mail/procmail) which contains a stunningly useful utility called formail(1). Amongst formail's many talents is the ability to split up a mbox format mailbox into individual messages and pipe each into a program. So in order to resend all of the messages in your dead.letter you could try: % formail -s /usr/sbin/sendmail -v -t -oiee < dead.letter Or to split up the dead.letter mailbox into individual numbered messages: % formail -s /bin/sh -c 'cat > msg.$FILENO' < dead.letter and you can pipe each message into sendmail as above to re-send it: % /usr/sbin/sendmail -v -t -oiee < msg.999 Nb. be careful when doing this sort of thing, or you'll spray e-mails all over the place and make yourself quite unpopular. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --R+My9LyyhiUvIEro Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAA+IhdtESqEQa7a0RAmZOAJ9QNd6gVzMrEIejMifstTSxFp11zwCglYcf VOWKCwLEG0BlV65Z3Rvk4m8= =/5sq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --R+My9LyyhiUvIEro-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 04:22:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A06E16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:22:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9D143D2F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:22:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0DCNho9058748; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:23:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0DCNh72058747; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:23:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ei.bzerk.org: bulk set sender to mail25@bzerk.org using -f Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:23:43 +0100 From: Ruben de Groot To: Vahric MUHTARYAN Message-ID: <20040113122343.GC57681@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Vahric MUHTARYAN , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Whan can I do if OS does not boot after makeworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:22:47 -0000 On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:34:25PM +0200, Vahric MUHTARYAN typed: > Hi Everybody , > > I heared in list and some sites that some times after makeworld > system can't boot . I wonder What FreeBSD Admins make to solve this problem > . Does possbile to prevent this problem ?! Any way ?! What exactly have you done to "makeworld" and what do you mean by "system can't boot" (error messages) ? > > Vahric > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 04:27:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3C316A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:27:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9CF43D53 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:27:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0DCSro9058788; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:28:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0DCSrDk058787; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:28:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ei.bzerk.org: bulk set sender to mail25@bzerk.org using -f Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:28:53 +0100 From: Ruben de Groot To: Matthew Seaman , Rishi Chopra , questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040113122853.GD57681@ei.bzerk.org> References: <4003126E.5030107@cal.berkeley.edu> <20040113115550.GB23956@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040113115550.GB23956@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: FreeBSD, SSH and "Enter Authentication Response" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:27:17 -0000 On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:55:50AM +0000, Matthew Seaman typed: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 01:32:30PM -0800, Rishi Chopra wrote: > > I have a nitpicky question about logging into a FreeBSD machine and > > SSH. I'm using a minimal FreeBSD install and SSH Secure Shell client > > v3.2.0 - the crux of the problem is I am unable to "smoothly" login. > > Which FreeBSD version? And are you running the OpenSSH server > supplied with the system or one from ports? Judging by name and version number, I think he's not running OpenSSH at all, but the other ssh implementation from ssh.org > > When I login to my machine, I'm prompted to enter an "authentication > > response". A window is displayed with "Enter Authentication Response" > > in the title bar, and two buttons at the bottom ('OK' and 'Cancel') - > > the text says: > > > > Enter your authentication response. > > Password: > > Sounds like you've got the PAM based challenge-response authentication > enabled in your /etc/ssh/sshd_config (which is the default), but > your /etc/pam.conf (FreeBSD 4.x) or /etc/pam.d (FreeBSD 5.x) has a > modified configuration. > > Here are a couple of things to try -- > > Turn off Challenge-response authentication in /etc/ssh/sshd_config > > Change: > > #ChallengeResponseAuthentication yes > > to > > ChallengeResponseAuthentication no > > and then: > > # kill -HUP `cat /var/run/sshd.pid` > > to get it to reread the config. > > -- or -- > > Double check the PAM settings: they should look like this in /etc/pam.conf > > # OpenSSH with PAM support requires similar modules. The session one is > # a bit strange, though... > sshd auth sufficient pam_skey.so > sshd auth sufficient pam_opie.so no_fake_prompts > #sshd auth requisite pam_opieaccess.so > #sshd auth sufficient pam_kerberosIV.so try_first_pass > #sshd auth sufficient pam_krb5.so try_first_pass > sshd auth required pam_unix.so try_first_pass > sshd account required pam_unix.so > sshd password required pam_permit.so > sshd session required pam_permit.so > > The /etc/pam.d case is similar, except you should have a file called > 'sshd' in that directory, whose contents are similar, but without the > 'sshd' entries in the first column. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks > Savill Way > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow > Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 04:33:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1BCB16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:33:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (bay2-f67.bay2.hotmail.com [65.54.247.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E2D43D41 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:33:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from trivium98@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:28:20 -0800 Received: from 132.248.123.97 by by2fd.bay2.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:57:32 GMT X-Originating-IP: [132.248.123.97] X-Originating-Email: [trivium98@hotmail.com] X-Sender: trivium98@hotmail.com From: =?iso-8859-1?B?Vu2tY3RvciBHdXRp6XJyZXogQ3J1eg==?= To: questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:57:32 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2004 12:28:20.0477 (UTC) FILETIME=[BAAC12D0:01C3D9D0] Subject: Not found... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:33:03 -0000 When I install port of PHP4 solicits to me: PDFlib-Lite-5.0.0-Unix-src.tar.gz where I can obtain it?... Try to lower it of the sites that it indicates to me but it does not find it http://www.pdflib.com/products/pdflib/download/ ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/disfiles Atte. Víctor Gutiérrez Cruz Si vales, valeo (Antiguo saludo en Latín que significa: Si tu estas bien yo estoy bien) _________________________________________________________________ Únete al mayor servicio mundial de correo electrónico: http://www.hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 04:43:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D70A16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:43:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E7243D2D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:43:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i0DCh9fn016821 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:43:09 GMT (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i0DCh9m2016820; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:43:09 GMT (envelope-from matthew) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:43:09 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman To: Jefferson San Juan Message-ID: <20040113124309.GD23956@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Jefferson San Juan , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <000d01c3d980$5521b6e0$5858269e@JANELLE> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xB0nW4MQa6jZONgY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000d01c3d980$5521b6e0$5858269e@JANELLE> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: binary execute restrictions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:43:17 -0000 --xB0nW4MQa6jZONgY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 03:52:49AM +0100, Jefferson San Juan wrote: > How do I restrict normal users from executing their own compiled executab= le > binary files? > I use FreeBSD 4.9. This is actually a very difficult problem: FreeBSD is designed to let people run executables, not to stop them doing that... Put all of the user home directories on a separate partition which you mount with the noexec flag. Make sure that the users have no write access to anywhere outside their home directories. This includes the various world writable temporary directories /tmp, /var/tmp, etc. However, not permitting users to write files in /tmp or /var/tmp will lead to much wailing and gnashing of teeth, because a lot of applications are going to break. Investigate setting the TMPDIR environment variable either from /etc/login.conf or else from /etc/csh.login (for tcsh(1) users) or /etc/profile (for bash(1) or sh(1) users) to ameliorate that. If you set TMPDIR=3D${HOME}/tmp each user can have their own private temporary area under their home directory. Note however that this only has an advisory effect: not all applications will obey $TMPDIR. You can mount the shared temporary directories noexec -- which will work exceeedingly well 99.9% of the time. Investigate mounting /tmp as a memory filesystem -- see mount_mfs(8) -- as a good way to do that. Symlink other shared temporary areas to your memory filesystem if you don't want to have more than one. Nb. One occasion doing this will definitely cause problems is when you are updating your system by 'make installworld' -- however that is a sufficiently uncommon event that you can feasibly do a temporary remount of /tmp without noexec in that case. Even so, a determined user could probably still work out ways to get an executable executed, but they'd have to put some effort into working out how. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --xB0nW4MQa6jZONgY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAA+fddtESqEQa7a0RAk4IAJ9q0pFkkIqK2mONv/tA9q8VSdFfYQCeLlLY cq6TquXlawsu0aJPbSmI/ck= =h4Wm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xB0nW4MQa6jZONgY-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 04:55:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B20016A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:55:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub.ihlas.net.tr (mailhub.ihlas.net.tr [213.238.128.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3C6C43D39 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:55:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmalik@ihlas.net.tr) Received: (qmail 12906 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2004 12:55:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maslak) (213.238.150.220) by mailhub.ihlas.net.tr with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 12:55:28 -0000 Message-ID: <004b01c3d9d4$5d6cee60$dc96eed5@maslak> From: =?iso-8859-9?Q?Malik_B=FClent?= To: Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:54:21 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: mac address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:55:58 -0000 hello=20 i use freebsd5.1 and i want to reject some computers whose according to = "Mac Addresses"=20 and i recompiled kernel with=20 options IPFIREWALL=20 then i made ipfw.sh with touch and wrote in ; ipfw add deny MAC 00:60:67:28:0c:1e any =20 =20 ipfw add deny MAC any 00:60:67:28:0c:1e but I couldn't reject above machine What shall i do ? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 05:02:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5E916A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:02:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from etrn2.doruk.net.tr (etrn2.doruk.net.tr [212.58.5.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25C643D4C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:02:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vahric@doruk.net.tr) Received: from mail.doruk.net.tr ([212.58.5.6] helo=doruk.net.tr) by etrn2.doruk.net.tr with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AgOHe-0007Mw-Fx; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:08:38 +0200 Received: from [212.58.13.17] (account vahric HELO VAHOXP) by doruk.net.tr (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 71774938; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:08:32 +0200 From: "Vahric MUHTARYAN" To: "'Ruben de Groot'" Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:02:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20040113122343.GC57681@ei.bzerk.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Thread-Index: AcPZ0Nxc+1ZaMNf2RYyVJMzWWBtrbgAABJfA Message-ID: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Whan can I do if OS does not boot after makeworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:02:51 -0000 Hi , I did not make something now and I don't have a problem with makeworld. But I red something in FreeBSD from scratch and I saw that some problem can occur and after makeworld process OS is not openinig .... Vahric -----Original Message----- From: Ruben de Groot [mailto:mail25@bzerk.org] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 2:24 PM To: Vahric MUHTARYAN Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Whan can I do if OS does not boot after makeworld On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:34:25PM +0200, Vahric MUHTARYAN typed: > Hi Everybody , > > I heared in list and some sites that some times after makeworld > system can't boot . I wonder What FreeBSD Admins make to solve this problem > . Does possbile to prevent this problem ?! Any way ?! What exactly have you done to "makeworld" and what do you mean by "system can't boot" (error messages) ? > > Vahric > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 05:05:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038E416A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:05:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447B943D5C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:05:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i0DD5Sfn017126 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:05:28 GMT (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i0DD5R6Z017125; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:05:27 GMT (envelope-from matthew) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:05:27 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?V=ED=ADctor_Guti=E9rrez?= Cruz Message-ID: <20040113130527.GF23956@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , =?iso-8859-1?Q?V=ED=ADctor_Guti=E9rrez?= Cruz , questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jkO+KyKz7TfD21mV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Not found... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:05:35 -0000 --jkO+KyKz7TfD21mV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 01:57:32PM -0600, V=ED=ADctor Guti=E9rrez Cruz wrot= e: > When I install port of PHP4 solicits to me: >=20 > PDFlib-Lite-5.0.0-Unix-src.tar.gz >=20 > where I can obtain it?... That's an old version. The PDFlib authors' latest version is 5.0.2, and it seems that tey've removed the old versions from their distribution sites. What you should do is update your ports tree using cvsup(8): http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html And see the example supfiles in /usr/share/samples/cvsup. Note that you always need 'tag=3D.' when updating ports. Now when you go to install PHP4, it will use available versions of software for its dependencies. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --jkO+KyKz7TfD21mV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAA+0XdtESqEQa7a0RAs3fAJ9DvadtY3R3TLmKaSD0BkaGHGRJOgCdGVYc 4htB+k0Ud9TV3Q4aqTRrwSo= =QMO8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jkO+KyKz7TfD21mV-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 05:08:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E5E16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:08:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BCE43D1F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:08:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from malcolm.kay@internode.on.net) Received: from beta.home (ppp104-184.lns1.adl1.internode.on.net [150.101.104.184])i0DD89xC080615; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:38:09 +1030 (CST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Malcolm Kay Organization: At home To: "Ben Dover" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:38:08 +1030 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200401132338.08641.malcolm.kay@internode.on.net> Subject: Re: cannot open Makefile Error code 2 Installing port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:08:13 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:15, Ben Dover wrote: > This is probably simple but i can't find the answer in the handbook. I= am > installing the mod_frontpage port and I get the following error: > > devnu11# make install clean > =3D=3D=3D> Building for mod_frontpage-1.6.2 make seems to have read the top level Makefile to get this information... > make: cannot open Makefile. > *** Error code 2 thus it seems that this is some other Makefile -- probably in a sub direc= tory. > > Stop in /usr/ports/www/mod_frontpage. > > I CAN read the Makefile so I dont know what is wrong. I have tried > deleting the distfile hoping to start over but that didnt work. What d= o I > do next? > Malcolm kay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 05:10:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27AFC16A4CF for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:10:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccmmhc02.asp.att.net (sccmmhc02.asp.att.net [204.127.203.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E8243D53 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:10:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david.fleck@mchsi.com) Received: from grond (12-216-14-105.client.mchsi.com[12.216.14.105]) by sccmmhc02.asp.att.net (sccmmhc02) with SMTP id <20040113131034mm2009qshme>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:10:34 +0000 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:10:33 -0600 (CST) From: David Fleck Sender: dcf@grond.sourballs.org To: FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: <20040111202325.W424@grond.sourballs.org> Message-ID: <20040113070701.J602@grond.sourballs.org> References: <20040111202325.W424@grond.sourballs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: agp error with Radeon 7500 disables DRI X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:10:41 -0000 To answer my own question, it turns out that (for my system, at least) the agp.ko module *must not be preloaded* with loader.conf. Commenting agp_load="YES" out of /boot/loader.conf fixed all three problems listed here. On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, David Fleck wrote: > 4.9-RELEASE-p1. > > At boot, the agp module appears to load OK: > > # dmesg | grep agp > Preloaded elf module "agp.ko" at 0xc03d336c. > agp0: mem 0xe0000000-0xe7ffffff at device > 0.0 on pci0 > agp0: allocating GATT for aperture of size 256M > > However, when starting X, the kernel spits out this message: > > /kernel: error: [drm:radeon_unlock] *ERROR* Process 265 using kernel > context 0 > > There is no such process when I look, of course... the relevant section > of the XFree86 log is: > > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] created "radeon" driver at busid "PCI:1:0:0" > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 8192 byte SAREA at 0xc22ce000 > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] mapped SAREA 0xc22ce000 to 0x28279000 > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] framebuffer handle = 0xd8000000 > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] added 1 reserved context for kernel > (WW) RADEON(0): [agp] AGP not available > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel > (II) RADEON(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0xc22ce000 at > 0x28279000 > (II) RADEON(0): Memory manager initialized to (0,0) (1024,8191) > > I'm assuming there's some relationship between (a) the kernel warning > message, (b) the 'AGP not available' message, and (c) the fact that DRI > doesn't work anymore (it did before I upgraded from 4.6.2 to 4.9). Can > anyone think of where to look to figure this out? -- David Fleck david.fleck@mchsi.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 04:32:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3AE416A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:32:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from kitty.eerc.kiev.ua (kitty.eerc.kiev.ua [195.230.130.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC9F943D54 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 04:32:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vyepishov@eerc.kiev.ua) Received: (qmail 95074 invoked by uid 1001); 13 Jan 2004 12:32:46 -0000 Received: from ns.kre.tr.ukrtel.net (ns.kre.tr.ukrtel.net [213.179.238.226]) by wwwmail.eerc.kiev.ua (IMP) with HTTP for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:32:46 +0200 Message-ID: <1073997166.4003e56e43a1a@wwwmail.eerc.kiev.ua> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:32:46 +0200 From: vyepishov@eerc.kiev.ua To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 213.179.238.226 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:22:11 -0800 Subject: Help: xdm is cycled when enabled X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:32:58 -0000 Dear Sirs, I am writing to you because I have some problem with recently installed Unix FreeBSD 5.1. I must say you that I am new user of FreeBSD, and therefore I need some advice. And here is my problem: when I installed FreeBSD and added KDE environment as the default X Window environment for my system, everything was perfect, except the fact that I cannot enable xdm to log in X Window environment properly (HERE IS THE CORE OF THE PROBLEM: when I enabled xdm in etc/ttys file, then after rebooting xdm started, but when I entered login and password, xdm, again, started, that is, this program was like cycled) instead of logging in console. I strictly followed the instructions given in Chapter 5 of the FreeBSD Handbook, but I couldn't do anything about it. May be the problem is that the instructions are not enough detailed for me. That is why I ask you to help me. Thank you in advance. Yours sincerely, Vadym Yepishov, Ukrainian fan of FreeBSD From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 05:26:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF0E16A4CE; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:26:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccmmhc02.asp.att.net (sccmmhc02.asp.att.net [204.127.203.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0516D43D2D; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:26:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david.fleck@mchsi.com) Received: from grond (12-216-14-105.client.mchsi.com[12.216.14.105]) by sccmmhc02.asp.att.net (sccmmhc02) with SMTP id <20040113132633mm2009qg1ue>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:26:33 +0000 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:26:32 -0600 (CST) From: David Fleck Sender: dcf@grond.sourballs.org To: Ernst de Haan In-Reply-To: <200401122003.38279.znerd@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <20040113071631.R602@grond.sourballs.org> References: <200401062310.40460.znerd@FreeBSD.org> <20040109074040.P2988@grond.sourballs.org> <200401122003.38279.znerd@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with amd (automount daemon) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:26:35 -0000 On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Ernst de Haan wrote: > Still haven't completely figured out what the solution is, but I think I > know what's happening: > > - kscd is hanging to the drive, even though there is no audio CD in there > - amd fails at the first attempt to read /dev/cd0c and fails on succeeding > calls > > However, even if I reload amd with 'killall -HUP amd' it doesn't show > anything below /mnt/cdrom/. Perhaps there is some other file locked? It's possible. If you kill amd, can you mount the cdrom manually? Does anything show up in /var/log/messages after you try to cd to the mounted CD? -- David Fleck david.fleck@mchsi.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 05:31:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A65716A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:31:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from razorbill.mail.pas.earthlink.net (razorbill.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464B143D49 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:31:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 22-15.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.22.15] helo=yoda.datawok.com) by razorbill.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AgOdZ-0007Ms-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:31:17 -0800 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: "Vahric MUHTARYAN" , "'Ruben de Groot'" Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:31:17 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401130731.18057.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b6c53a31ec0399594e1f84980b6094c8a350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Whan can I do if OS does not boot after makeworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:31:32 -0000 On Tuesday 13 January 2004 07:02 am, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > Hi , > > I did not make something now and I don't have a problem with makeworld. But > I red something in FreeBSD from scratch and I saw that some problem can > occur and after makeworld process OS is not openinig .... > > Vahric This is not going to sound very helpful; but if you're trying to be proactive.......read the documentation thoroughly and follow the steps carefully. Don't cut corners or make mistakes. Unless you can predict the error, it's hard to predict the solution. Best regards, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 05:31:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE0116A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:31:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from Vitsch.net (b74143.upc-b.chello.nl [212.83.74.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D7143D1F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:31:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Danovitsch@Vitsch.net) Received: from FreeBSD.Danovitsch.LAN (b83007.upc-b.chello.nl [212.83.83.7]) by Vitsch.net (8.12.3p2/8.11.3) with ESMTP id i0DDV6Xe088308; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:31:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Danovitsch@Vitsch.net) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-9" From: "Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN]" To: Malik =?iso-8859-9?q?B=FClent?= Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:31:37 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <004b01c3d9d4$5d6cee60$dc96eed5@maslak> In-Reply-To: <004b01c3d9d4$5d6cee60$dc96eed5@maslak> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200401131431.37985.Danovitsch@Vitsch.net> cc: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mac address X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:31:38 -0000 On Tuesday 13 January 2004 13:54, Malik B=FClent wrote: > hello > > i use freebsd5.1 and i want to reject some computers whose according t= o > "Mac Addresses" and i recompiled kernel with > options IPFIREWALL > > then i made ipfw.sh with touch and wrote in ; > ipfw add deny MAC 00:60:67:28:0c:1e any > ipfw add deny MAC any 00:60:67:28:0c:1e > > but I couldn't reject above machine > What shall i do ? You have to it first with a sysctl : # sysctl -w net.link.ether.ipfw=3D1 grtz, Daan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 05:37:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03BBF16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:37:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44CB43D2F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:37:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2004011313375501100lkqope>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:37:55 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id C634B55; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:37:55 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: vyepishov@eerc.kiev.ua References: <1073997166.4003e56e43a1a@wwwmail.eerc.kiev.ua> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 13 Jan 2004 08:37:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1073997166.4003e56e43a1a@wwwmail.eerc.kiev.ua> Message-ID: <448ykc6kb0.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 35 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Help: xdm is cycled when enabled X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:37:59 -0000 vyepishov@eerc.kiev.ua writes: > Dear Sirs, > > I am writing to you because I have some problem with recently installed Unix > FreeBSD 5.1. > > I must say you that I am new user of FreeBSD, and therefore I need some advice. > And here is my problem: when I installed FreeBSD and added KDE environment as > the default X Window environment for my system, everything was perfect, except > the fact that I cannot enable xdm to log in X Window environment properly > (HERE IS THE CORE OF THE PROBLEM: when I enabled xdm in etc/ttys file, then > after rebooting xdm started, but when I entered login and password, xdm, again, > started, that is, this program was like cycled) > instead of logging in console. I strictly followed the instructions given in > Chapter 5 of the FreeBSD Handbook, but I couldn't do anything about it. May be > the problem is that the instructions are not enough detailed for me. > > That is why I ask you to help me. Thank you in advance. It sounds like you don't have a proper .xsession file. Start by removing whatever you already have for a .xsession file, and you'll get the system default one. If that doesn't work, look in ~/.xsession-errors. If it does work, then you need to debug your .xsession file (remember that you *don't* want it to exit while you are running an xdm session. For reference, my .xsession file is at http://be-well.ilk.org:8088/~lowell/systuff/scripts/xsession -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area: resume/CV at http://be-well.ilk.org:8088/~lowell/resume/ username/password "public" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 05:43:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F299B16A4D0 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:43:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from firecrest.mail.pas.earthlink.net (firecrest.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494F743D4C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:43:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 22-15.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.22.15] helo=yoda.datawok.com) by firecrest.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AgOpU-0000Ut-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:43:36 -0800 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: Carvalho Paulo , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:43:36 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20040113083118.31358.qmail@web12823.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040113083118.31358.qmail@web12823.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401130743.36528.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b0d7c340349c19e015ecd3096993aaf1a350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Subject: Re: XFree86 configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:43:47 -0000 On Tuesday 13 January 2004 02:31 am, Carvalho Paulo wrote: > Hello everyone, > I just installed FreeBSD 4.9, and when I try to > cofigure X through sysinstall it gives an error > message in the end. The messege says that an error has > ocurred and asks if I want to try again. I tried > several times and then gave up. > What I want to know is if there is any way that I > can know what went wrong so that I can do it right. > The error message does not give any clue as to what > hapened. > Thanks in advance for taking time to read this > message and for a possible reply. > > Paulo de Carvalho. I stopped using the X configuration utilities in favor of 'XFree86 -configure' to let XFree86 make its best guess at my hardware. It creates a configuration file under /root/ for review and modification. There are directions at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/x-config.html Best of luck, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 05:54:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E108016A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:54:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccimhc02.asp.att.net (sccimhc02.asp.att.net [63.240.76.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0587543D48 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 05:54:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from david.fleck@mchsi.com) Received: from grond (12-216-14-105.client.mchsi.com[12.216.14.105]) by sccimhc02.asp.att.net (sccimhc02) with SMTP id <20040113135448im200688ume>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:54:49 +0000 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:54:48 -0600 (CST) From: David Fleck Sender: dcf@grond.sourballs.org To: August Simonelli In-Reply-To: <2F015412-45A7-11D8-A62D-000A95A55144@swiftdsl.com.au> Message-ID: <20040113075251.F602@grond.sourballs.org> References: <2F015412-45A7-11D8-A62D-000A95A55144@swiftdsl.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: FreeBSD-questions Subject: Re: /etc/rc.conf vs /etc/defaults/rc.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:54:51 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, August Simonelli wrote: > Thanks all who helped me on this! I really do appreciate it! By the way, this is covered in section 6.3 in the handbook, 'Core Configuration'. -- David Fleck david.fleck@mchsi.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 07:04:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E94F16A4CF for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:04:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0722F43D3F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:04:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AgQ67-0005vf-00 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:04:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AgQ66-0005vX-00 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:04:50 +0100 Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AgQ66-00068e-00 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:04:50 +0100 From: "Jared Cheney" Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:04:52 -0700 Lines: 133 Message-ID: References: X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Sender: news Subject: Re: Trouble getting network card to work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:04:59 -0000 Thanks - I will give this a try when I get a chance. When I got back in to work yesterday I found a couple of 10/100 cards from a different vendor (Intel) and threw them in and they worked on the first boot. Depending on how much time we have before my team needs to begin using the box, I may not be able to test with the old cards, but I'll tuck away this information for future use. Thanks for everyone's help! BTW, we're going to be using the machine as a router in our test lab and setting up ipfw rules in conjunction with dummynet 'pipes' for WAN emulation. As I've been playing around with this I've been amazed at all that can be done with it -- hats off to the FreeBSD community for building such an excellent tool. "fbsd_user" wrote in message news:MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGGEALFEAA.fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com... > Add this to your kernel source and recompile the kernel. > > "device puc" > > This uses an more detailed approach to probing older bio's > and motherboards PCI slots. > I found this as an solution posted in the questions archives. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jared > Cheney > Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 10:33 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Trouble getting network card to work > > Thanks for the suggestion. I tried this and unfortunately, it did > not work > :( Same behavior no matter what PCI slot I put it in. I have > successfully > been able to get an old ISA NE2000 card configured and up in the > system, so > I'm at least able to talk on the network. However, I'd really like > to get > the PCI card working, so I can get 100Mbps connections. > > Anyone have any other ideas? > > Thanks > "fbsd_user" wrote in message > news:MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGOEPNFDAA.fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com... > > I just went through that on my pre Y2K PC using 4.9. Different PCI > > Nic card, but same symptoms. Had to enable verbose boot messages. > > Saw that every time I rebooted system the boot log showed an msg > > saying something about unrecognized ID. I know the card was good > so > > I just kept moving the Nic card to different PCI slot, rebooting, > > until it finally worked. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Jared > > Cheney > > Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2004 4:28 PM > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > Subject: Trouble getting network card to work > > > > Hello, > > > > I've just installed FreeBSD 4.9 and am having trouble getting my > > network > > card to work. It is very odd, because it appears as though the > > kernel > > recognizes the card just fine and is using the pcn module to bring > > it up, > > etc. > > > > It is an AMD 79c79x card (according to FreeBSD). I can view/set > > properties > > via ifconfig - and it properly shows whether or not there is link. > > I cannot > > obtain a DHCP lease, nor can I ping any other hosts on my network > > when I > > have a static IP configured. > > > > To ensure that the NIC is fine and all cables, etc. - I booted > from > > a > > bootable Linux CD (Knoppix), where I was able to use the card fine > > to ping, > > browse the Internet, etc. Linux showed it as an AMD 79c970 > [PCNET32 > > LANCE] > > card. > > > > The card is called pcn0 in FreeBSD, and it says that it is sharing > > IRQ 10. > > Running tcpdump for any length of time also shows that 0 packets > > were > > received by the filter. > > > > Anyone have any ideas as to what could be the problem? > > > > Thanks, in advance, > > Jared > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 07:10:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E93916A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:10:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts13.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637CF43D9D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:10:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dlavigne6@sympatico.ca) Received: from genisis ([64.230.164.184]) by tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040113151035.TCTY23150.tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net@genisis> for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:10:35 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:13:07 -0500 (EST) From: Dru X-X-Sender: dlavigne6@genisis.domain.org To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040113100451.L640@genisis.domain.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: porteasy error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:10:52 -0000 I successfully created a minimal ports structure using "porteasy -a -u". However, when I try to fetch a specific port skeleton, I receive these messages: porteasy -v -u -a lynx-2.8.5d16_3 cvs server: Updating Mk Reading /usr/ports/INDEX-5 9724 ports in index Pass 0: www/lynx-current >>> cd /usr/ports >>> /usr/bin/cvs -f -z3 -R -d:pserver:anoncvs@anoncvs.FreeBSD.org:/home/ncvs update -A -P -d -l www cvs [update aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if any) /usr/bin/cvs returned exit code 1 error updating the 'www' category. This is a minimal 5.1-RELEASE system. The amount of messages above the first line of output varies depending upon what directory I'm in, but always ends in the same aborted update message. Dru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 07:11:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5B316A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:11:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from wopr.ife.no (wopr.ife.no [128.39.4.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8B743D62 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:10:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steinms@wopr.ife.no) Received: from wopr.ife.no (sagan.ife.no [128.39.226.253]) by wopr.ife.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA24202; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:10:20 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <40040A5C.7040902@wopr.ife.no> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:10:20 +0100 From: sms User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030811 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kent Stewart References: <4003C9D7.5040706@wopr.ife.no> <200401130346.30178.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200401130346.30178.kstewart@owt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: stein@ife.no cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ImageMagic port build fails (again). X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:11:33 -0000 Kent Stewart wrote: > On Tuesday 13 January 2004 02:35 am, sms wrote: > >>Hi, fyi >> >>Did a ports upgrade on a FreeBSD4.8 system >>01/13/04 10:50am GMT+1. >> >>The reason for this upgrade was to test newer versions of >>ImageMagic, because of problems with the one currently installed >>(PACKAGE_LIB_VERSION_NUMBER="5,5,7,2"). >> >>It fails in the resize function (used in conjunction with Zope and >>the Zope product Photo. Photo uses ImageMagic) >> >>A build of ImageMagic-5.5.7-14 fails as follows: > > > Did you update jasper? Since I have -14 installed, it looks like you have some > out of date dependancies that have to be upgrade before ImageMagick can be. > > Kent > I did in a complete (well not really true, excluded the non-English ports, like ports-chinese etc) ports collection update. My Makefile in /usr/ports/graphics/jasper has the following: PORTVERSION= 1.700.5 which is the latest, isnt it? There should not be any problems on a ports upgraded FreeBSD4.8 based system (vs FreeBSD4.9) should there? On beforehand, thank you. --sms /* Stein M Sandbech Email: stein@ife.no ** ** Senior Systems Engineer, EDP dept Web site: www.ife.no ** ** Institute for Energy Technology Tel: +47 63 80 60 00 ** ** Box 40, N-2007 Kjeller, NORWAY Fax: +47 63 81 11 68 */ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 07:20:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A931D16A4D0 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:20:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [206.71.64.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D71543D69 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:19:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.161.247.57] (helo=[192.168.99.66]) by hobbiton.shire.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.10) id 1AgQKX-0007Wc-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:19:45 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) In-Reply-To: References: Message-Id: From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:19:43 -0700 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.609) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on hobbiton.shire.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_44 autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Level: Subject: Re: How "safe" is 5.2 to use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:20:24 -0000 On Jan 13, 2004, at 4:45 AM, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > Hi , > > You have to use FreeBSD 4.9, because you can see in freebsd web page > prodcution version is 4.9. and please test it maybe you will see you > can not > install 5.2 on your hardware because when I try to install 5.1 on my > intel > platform I faced a problem then now I'm using 4.9 . Everybody will say > that > wait until more tested version and now its 4.9 > Which begs the question. Will FBSD 5 ever be deemed worthy for production use? Over the last year it was said in this list: 5.1 is still a testing version not recommended for production, but 5.2 will be better suited for production. I intend to transition a less used production server from 4.7 to 5.2 sometime in the next month, and we'll see how it goes. There are certain things I would like from 5... Chad > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of David Meier > Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:19 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: How "safe" is 5.2 to use? > > Hello list, > > I am relatively new to the world of FreeBSD. But first, congrats to the > new release! I am somewhat insecure on how trustfully I can use the new > release for my intended use (and I hope my questions haven't been > posted a > zillion times before). Therefore I hope the FreeBSD nuts can advise me > whether to go for 4.9 or 5.2. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 07:29:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB12716A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:29:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from 82-41-27-158.cable.ubr04.edin.blueyonder.co.uk (82-41-27-158.cable.ubr04.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.27.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB9143D5F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:29:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrew@cream.org) Received: from cream.org (spatula.flat [192.168.0.2]) by myriad.flat (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32C3C2; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:23:07 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <40040EE9.2000608@cream.org> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:29:45 +0000 From: Andrew Boothman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Adams References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New installation: Hanging when trying to dial out X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:29:43 -0000 John Adams wrote: > On Monday, January 12, 2004, at 09:59 PM, fbsd_user wrote: > >> It would be a whole lot more helpful if you posted your ppp.conf >> and the ppp.log of your last test > > > I may have to type this in--I'm unable to mount the floppy drive, and > MAKEDEV is telling me "bad unit for disk in: fd*" for each /dev/fd*. > Should I consider this a second message to me saying, you have weird > hardware, and give up? I'd rather not. Perhaps I have a different > problem to work with first, getting the floppy mounted so I can write > logs to it. Advice? How are you trying to mount your floppy? "mount -t msdos /dev/fd0 /mnt"? >> Explain how you know FBSD has found your modem and can connect to >> it. > > > Perhaps it hasn't--the last thing in the ppp.log is: > > ppp[116]: tun0 : Command: /dev/tty: set device cuaa0 > > That's from the interactive mode entry. From the auto mode entry, the > last listing is: > > ppp[116]: tun0: Phase: PPP Started (auto mode) This might be a silly question, but the modem is plugged into serial port 1 isn't it? Try using /dev/cuaa1? Are your serial ports probed correctly during boot? Look at "dmesg|grep cuaa". TBH, it's been a long time since I did PPP under FreeBSD. Broadband rules ;) Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 07:31:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA9816A4CF for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:31:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from etrn2.doruk.net.tr (etrn2.doruk.net.tr [212.58.5.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6047843D3F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:31:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from vahric@doruk.net.tr) Received: from mail.doruk.net.tr ([212.58.5.6] helo=doruk.net.tr) by etrn2.doruk.net.tr with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AgQbk-0002mI-71; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:37:32 +0200 Received: from [212.58.13.17] (account vahric HELO VAHOXP) by doruk.net.tr (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 71820572; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:37:47 +0200 From: "Vahric MUHTARYAN" To: "'Andrew L. Gould'" Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:31:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <200401130731.18057.algould@datawok.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Thread-Index: AcPZ2nQSSM2BuTV8SmmYtdlGo14c0gACCyFQ Message-ID: cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Whan can I do if OS does not boot after makeworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:31:50 -0000 Did you ever have any problem about makeworld process ?! I afraid of one day will come and I can't boot my FreeBSD Vahric -----Original Message----- From: Andrew L. Gould [mailto:algould@datawok.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:31 PM To: Vahric MUHTARYAN; 'Ruben de Groot' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Whan can I do if OS does not boot after makeworld On Tuesday 13 January 2004 07:02 am, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > Hi , > > I did not make something now and I don't have a problem with makeworld. But > I red something in FreeBSD from scratch and I saw that some problem can > occur and after makeworld process OS is not openinig .... > > Vahric This is not going to sound very helpful; but if you're trying to be proactive.......read the documentation thoroughly and follow the steps carefully. Don't cut corners or make mistakes. Unless you can predict the error, it's hard to predict the solution. Best regards, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 07:34:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC53F16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:34:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from 82-41-27-158.cable.ubr04.edin.blueyonder.co.uk (82-41-27-158.cable.ubr04.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.27.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D29043D46 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:34:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrew@cream.org) Received: from cream.org (spatula.flat [192.168.0.2]) by myriad.flat (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B926C2; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:27:52 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <40041006.9010000@cream.org> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:34:30 +0000 From: Andrew Boothman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD User References: <20040113033814.GA15670@darkstar.blacksun.net.au> In-Reply-To: <20040113033814.GA15670@darkstar.blacksun.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cant boot from large disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:34:26 -0000 FreeBSD User wrote: > Howdy Questions, > > I am having problems with 4.8 Release booting from a large hard disk > (80 - 160G) on an old (socket7) motherboard. > > I have the same problem with linux. Making the root partition > smaller that 1000M, puting it on the first disk, etc etc doesnt > help in either case. I have also tried a few different bootloaders, > in all cases, the bootloader either failed to load, or failed to > boot the OS. > > With Linux (redhat7.x) I was able to build a bootable floppy on which > the location of the root partition was stored, and boot off that. > I could also interrupt the boot, enter different values, and boot > off of a different partition. Hardly ideal, but satisfactory. What bootloader did Redhat give you? Isn't it grub? I've used grub for ages to dual-boot Win2k and FreeBSD - it can boot FreeBSD no problem. My FreeBSD slice is at the start of my second drive so I type into grub: root (hd1,0,a) chainloader +1 boot And hey-presto FreeBSD boots no problem! There's possibly a way to get other bootloaders to boot FreeBSD, I'm not to sure. But you might want to give grub a try anyway. Good luck. Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 07:41:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D5916A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:41:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from 82-41-27-158.cable.ubr04.edin.blueyonder.co.uk (82-41-27-158.cable.ubr04.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.27.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7BE43D49 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:41:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrew@cream.org) Received: from cream.org (spatula.flat [192.168.0.2]) by myriad.flat (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0070AC2; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:34:43 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <400411A2.3040800@cream.org> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:41:22 +0000 From: Andrew Boothman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: meier@logmail.net cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How "safe" is 5.2 to use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:41:25 -0000 Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2004, at 4:45 AM, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > >> Hi , >> >> You have to use FreeBSD 4.9, because you can see in freebsd web page >> prodcution version is 4.9. and please test it maybe you will see you >> can not >> install 5.2 on your hardware because when I try to install 5.1 on my >> intel >> platform I faced a problem then now I'm using 4.9 . Everybody will say >> that >> wait until more tested version and now its 4.9 >> > > Which begs the question. Will FBSD 5 ever be deemed worthy for > production use? That's a question that only you can answer. Will there ever be a time when The FreeBSD Project offically recommends 5.x for production use? Almost certainly yes - just not yet. Each sysadmin has to make his own decision about when he wants to upgrade. Some might have no problems with 5.x as it stands and want to upgrade immediately to make use of new functionality - other may want to wait longer. This isn't a one-size-fits-all question. Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 07:41:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C610316A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:41:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41C3843D1D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:41:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from daleco.biz ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:44:45 -0600 Message-ID: <40041172.5070602@daleco.biz> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:40:34 -0600 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031124 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2004 15:44:45.0937 (UTC) FILETIME=[2B5A8E10:01C3D9EC] cc: meier@logmail.net cc: vahric@doruk.net.tr cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How "safe" is 5.2 to use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:41:44 -0000 -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of David Meier > Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:19 PM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: How "safe" is 5.2 to use? > > Hello list, > > I am relatively new to the world of FreeBSD. But first, congrats to the > new release! I am somewhat insecure on how trustfully I can use the new > release for my intended use (and I hope my questions haven't been > posted a > zillion times before). Therefore I hope the FreeBSD nuts can advise me > whether to go for 4.9 or 5.2. Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > > On Jan 13, 2004, at 4:45 AM, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > >> Hi , >> >> You have to use FreeBSD 4.9, because you can see in freebsd web page >> prodcution version is 4.9. and please test it maybe you will see you >> can not >> install 5.2 on your hardware because when I try to install 5.1 on my >> intel >> platform I faced a problem then now I'm using 4.9 . Everybody will >> say that >> wait until more tested version and now its 4.9 >> > > Which begs the question. Will FBSD 5 ever be deemed worthy for > production use? Over the last year it was said in this list: 5.1 is > still a testing version not recommended for production, but 5.2 will > be better suited for production. > > I intend to transition a less used production server from 4.7 to 5.2 > sometime in the next month, and we'll see how it goes. There are > certain things I would like from 5... > > Chad The "roadmap" now says that 5.X will branch to -STABLE around the time of 5.3, instead of the earlier prediction of 5.2. It seems likely that folks will take that with a grain of salt, but perhaps we can be appreciative of the fact that the RELENG team wants a little extra time to make sure things are, well, stable before they name it as such. It's not unlike a lot of other projects; I've created a website in two weeks, and I've another that's crawled on for well over a year. Some things are that way, and let's remember the adage "beggars can't be choosers." I think it would be difficult to find a large project that hasn't suffered from things like "feature creep...." For a "free" (in the best sense of the word) OS, we've got a Good Thing going here. FWIW, I'm running 5.1 pretty well in a server environment at the present, and just built 5.2 yesterday; everything seems normal and is working well (pending successful completion of portupgrade, sometime tomorrow, probably ;-) ).... Kevin Kinsey From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 07:43:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE9116A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:43:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D965343D67 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:43:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jadams01@sprynet.com) Received: from sprynet.com ([68.158.5.45]) by imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net ESMTP <20040113154338.OXMK1950.imf23aec.mail.bellsouth.net@sprynet.com>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:43:38 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:45:20 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553) To: Andrew Boothman From: John Adams In-Reply-To: <40040EE9.2000608@cream.org> Message-Id: <7E7F3150-45DF-11D8-97CC-000393C505EC@sprynet.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553) cc: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New installation: Hanging when trying to dial out X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:43:49 -0000 On Tuesday, January 13, 2004, at 10:29 AM, Andrew Boothman wrote: > How are you trying to mount your floppy? "mount -t msdos /dev/fd0 > /mnt"? Well, I was just naively trying mount /dev/fd0 /mnt, but now I've tried it as you suggest, and again gotten "Device not configured". This is also what fdformat gives me when I try to format the disk. I'm also unable so far to mount the CD drive. > Are your serial ports probed correctly during boot? Look at > "dmesg|grep cuaa". Now, that's interesting. I get results for sio, but nothing for cuaa or tty. All the best, John A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 07:47:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C66416A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:47:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from zoot.lafn.org (zoot.lafn.ORG [206.117.18.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6E143D5A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:47:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from [10.0.1.2] (host-66-81-182-152.rev.o1.com [66.81.182.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoot.lafn.org (8.12.3p3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id i0DFkVwE074135 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:47:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) In-Reply-To: <20040113121841.GC23956@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <63340-22004121311314124@M2W045.mail2web.com> <20040113092421.GA73594@users.munk.nu> <20040113121841.GC23956@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Doug Hardie Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:47:35 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.609) Subject: Re: I need to resend messages from dead.letters X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:47:42 -0000 On Jan 13, 2004, at 04:18, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:24:21AM +0000, Jez Hancock wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 07:23:20PM -0800, Doug Hardie wrote: >>> There was a problem last night with my mail server and a bunch of >>> mail >>> went into the dead.letters mailbox rather than being sent. I have >>> that >>> mailbox and need a way to send all of those messages. I split them >>> out >>> into individual files, but there are just too many to send by hand. >>> Is >>> there a way to cause them all to be resent? > > > Or to split up the dead.letter mailbox into individual numbered > messages: > > % formail -s /bin/sh -c 'cat > msg.$FILENO' < dead.letter > > and you can pipe each message into sendmail as above to re-send it: > > % /usr/sbin/sendmail -v -t -oiee < msg.999 > > Nb. be careful when doing this sort of thing, or you'll spray e-mails > all over the place and make yourself quite unpopular. Thanks. I had missed the -t option to sendmail. That does exactly what I needed. -- Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 07:49:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD7B16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:49:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from firecrest.mail.pas.earthlink.net (firecrest.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F09743D3F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:49:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 22-15.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.22.15] helo=yoda.datawok.com) by firecrest.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AgQnS-0002gE-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:49:38 -0800 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:49:39 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401130949.39124.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b9d5d3d0ec2d0da1a62c2de730ba6c75e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Subject: Re: How "safe" is 5.2 to use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:49:40 -0000 On Tuesday 13 January 2004 09:19 am, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > On Jan 13, 2004, at 4:45 AM, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > > Hi , > > > > You have to use FreeBSD 4.9, because you can see in freebsd web page > > prodcution version is 4.9. and please test it maybe you will see you > > can not > > install 5.2 on your hardware because when I try to install 5.1 on my > > intel > > platform I faced a problem then now I'm using 4.9 . Everybody will say > > that > > wait until more tested version and now its 4.9 > > Which begs the question. Will FBSD 5 ever be deemed worthy for > production use? Over the last year it was said in this list: 5.1 is > still a testing version not recommended for production, but 5.2 will be > better suited for production. > > I intend to transition a less used production server from 4.7 to 5.2 > sometime in the next month, and we'll see how it goes. There are > certain things I would like from 5... > > Chad > I think this is issue-driven. You can find specific info at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/5-roadmap/index.html Best regards, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 07:52:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5259416A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:52:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE0D943D4C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:52:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from pooh.strauser.com (pooh.honeypot.net [10.0.5.128]) by kanga.honeypot.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0DFqP2J030098 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:52:26 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Kirk Strauser Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:52:23 -0600 Message-ID: <87hdyzj16w.fsf@strauser.com> Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: IPv6 and multiple interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:52:29 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm using an IPv6 tunnel to Hurricane Electric on my FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE firewall. That firewall has multiple Ethernet interfaces. Should each of those interfaces be assigned a routable IPv6 address? And what *is* "link-local"? Is there a decent (English language) FAQ that's readable by technical users who aren't networking experts? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser "94 outdated ports on the box, 94 outdated ports. Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done, 82 outdated ports on the box." --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBABBQ55sRg+Y0CpvERAuqQAJ9KOlLeNy6xTr6Y5bxOzQ+/QyesjQCdHTDB 0cs1mNSrbhLD27UMiWSMLwA= =xQZc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 07:54:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D404A16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:54:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from firecrest.mail.pas.earthlink.net (firecrest.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071F243D54 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:54:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 22-15.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.22.15] helo=yoda.datawok.com) by firecrest.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AgQsC-0004Bh-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:54:32 -0800 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: "Vahric MUHTARYAN" Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:54:33 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401130954.33715.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4bb5f58460aefde18a3867ae6428c3469d350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Whan can I do if OS does not boot after makeworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:54:45 -0000 On Tuesday 13 January 2004 09:31 am, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > Did you ever have any problem about makeworld process ?! > I afraid of one day will come and I can't boot my FreeBSD > > Vahric For me, the trickiest part was understanding and executing 'mergemaster -i' after 'make world'. Once I got a feel for it, updating my system has been a breeze. Best of luck, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 07:57:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B1A16A4CF for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:57:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta03-svc.ntlworld.com (mta03-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B0643D7D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:57:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scott@fishballoon.org) Received: from llama.fishballoon.org ([81.104.195.124]) by mta03-svc.ntlworld.comESMTP <20040113155706.BLIG14639.mta03-svc.ntlworld.com@llama.fishballoon.org>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:57:06 +0000 Received: from nat-215.apama.com ([195.153.206.215] helo=UKCAMW105) by llama.fishballoon.org with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD) id 1AgQtq-0002RY-6t; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:56:14 +0000 From: "Scott Mitchell" To: "'Vahric MUHTARYAN'" , "'Andrew L. Gould'" Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:55:57 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-reply-to: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Thread-Index: AcPZ2nQSSM2BuTV8SmmYtdlGo14c0gACCyFQAAKAzvA= Message-Id: X-Spam-Level: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Status: "llama.fishballoon.org", hasmessageblock similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details.youday will come and I can't boot my FreeBSD > > Vahric This is why the recommended update process is (in part): [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description -------------------------------------------------- cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Whan can I do if OS does not boot after makeworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:57:53 -0000 owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote: > Did you ever have any problem about makeworld process ?! > I afraid of one day will come and I can't boot my FreeBSD > > Vahric This is why the recommended update process is (in part): # make buildworld # make buildkernel # make installkernel Followed by a reboot into single-user mode before doing the installworld. If the new kernel doesn't boot, you've still got the previous one in /kernel.old, so you can just boot from that one and carry on without having trashed any part of your system. If installworld somehow manages to make your system unbootable, you have a few options: - boot single-user and try to fix things with the tools in /stand (or /rescue on 5.x) - boot CD #2 and try to fix things with the tools in the live filesystem - restore from backups (you do have backups, right?) Personally, I've made plenty of unbootable kernels, and a few worlds that behaved strangely in places, but never an unusable system (fingers crossed :-) Scott From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 08:02:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C5516A531 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:02:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A2243D4C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:02:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jshamlet@comcast.net) Received: from alexandria (pcp04637401pcs.gambrl01.md.comcast.net[68.49.84.210]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with SMTP id <20040113160230014004r7f3e>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:02:31 +0000 From: "J. Seth Henry" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, howells@kde.org Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:02:28 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20040113063744.6010216A505@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20040113063744.6010216A505@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401131102.28647.jshamlet@comcast.net> Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 43, Issue 4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:02:35 -0000 Guys, You can get a two slot chassis for a mini-ITX or flex-ATX board. The Travla= =20 C137 can take a 2-slot riser, though you are limited to using a 2.5" HDD. I= =20 used one of these chassis' for my primary router, with two 3Com 3C905TX NIC= 's=20 installed. Although present and working, I don't use the onboard NIC; thoug= h=20 the problems I had may have been with the cable modem, not the NIC. Caseoutlet sells them, but you can get more info on them from Travla. (http= :// www.travla.com/Products/C137/c137.html) Keep in mind, the onboard NIC is there, so all you really need is one=20 additional PCI NIC. Regards, Seth Henry On Tuesday 13 January 2004 01:37, freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org wro= te: > Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 01:25:22 +0000 > From: Chris Howells > Subject: Re: Mini atx for firewall > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <200401130125.22471.howells@kde.org> > Content-Type: Text/Plain; =A0charset=3D"iso-8859-1" > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday 19 November 2003 14:24, Francisco Reyes wrote: > > My primary concern is the network card. Since these small machines only > > have one PCI slot I will add one card for the internal network and then > > would need the onboard card to connect to the outside world. > > I just got a 4 port Adaptec NIC very very cheaply from ebay (about =A320 = GBP, > which included international shipping). Works great with de(4). > > I had the same problem with lack of PCI slots, =A0my server/router is > mini-ATX based and so only has three PCI slots, so it's working great now > with PCI IDE ,SCSI and 4 port net. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 08:02:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F33116A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:02:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from hiwatt.lognet.ch (hiwatt.lognet.ch [195.141.214.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC2A43D46 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:02:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from meier@logmail.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hiwatt.lognet.ch (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90BC3246E05 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:02:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from hiwatt.lognet.ch ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hiwatt.lognet.ch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 10556-01-10 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:02:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from hiwatt.lognet.ch (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by hiwatt.lognet.ch (Postfix) with SMTP id 31847246DCE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:02:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from firewalli.lognet.ch ([195.141.214.38]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user meier.logmail) by hiwatt.lognet.ch with HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:02:39 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <64730.195.141.214.38.1074009759.squirrel@hiwatt.lognet.ch> In-Reply-To: <40041172.5070602@daleco.biz> References: <40041172.5070602@daleco.biz> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:02:39 +0100 (CET) From: "David Meier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: Re: How "safe" is 5.2 to use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:02:43 -0000 I understand my question officially can only be answered to still use 4.9. I just wonder if anyone has used the 5.x for similar services as I plan to do, successfully or not. Dave > -----Original Message----- > >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of David Meier >> Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 1:19 PM >> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: How "safe" is 5.2 to use? >> >> Hello list, >> >> I am relatively new to the world of FreeBSD. But first, congrats to the >> new release! I am somewhat insecure on how trustfully I can use the new >> release for my intended use (and I hope my questions haven't been >> posted a >> zillion times before). Therefore I hope the FreeBSD nuts can advise me >> whether to go for 4.9 or 5.2. > > > > Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > >> >> On Jan 13, 2004, at 4:45 AM, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: >> >>> Hi , >>> >>> You have to use FreeBSD 4.9, because you can see in freebsd web page >>> prodcution version is 4.9. and please test it maybe you will see you >>> can not >>> install 5.2 on your hardware because when I try to install 5.1 on my >>> intel >>> platform I faced a problem then now I'm using 4.9 . Everybody will >>> say that >>> wait until more tested version and now its 4.9 >>> >> >> Which begs the question. Will FBSD 5 ever be deemed worthy for >> production use? Over the last year it was said in this list: 5.1 is >> still a testing version not recommended for production, but 5.2 will >> be better suited for production. >> >> I intend to transition a less used production server from 4.7 to 5.2 >> sometime in the next month, and we'll see how it goes. There are >> certain things I would like from 5... >> >> Chad > > > The "roadmap" now says that 5.X will branch to > -STABLE around the time of 5.3, instead of the > earlier prediction of 5.2. It seems likely that > folks will take that with a grain of salt, but > perhaps we can be appreciative of the fact that > the RELENG team wants a little extra time to > make sure things are, well, stable before they > name it as such. > > It's not unlike a lot of other projects; I've created > a website in two weeks, and I've another that's > crawled on for well over a year. Some things are > that way, and let's remember the adage "beggars > can't be choosers." I think it would be difficult to > find a large project that hasn't suffered from things > like "feature creep...." For a "free" (in the best > sense of the word) OS, we've got a Good Thing going here. > > FWIW, I'm running 5.1 pretty well in a server environment > at the present, and just built 5.2 yesterday; everything > seems normal and is working well (pending successful completion > of portupgrade, sometime tomorrow, probably ;-) ).... > > Kevin Kinsey > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 08:06:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D378C16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:06:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from 82-41-27-158.cable.ubr04.edin.blueyonder.co.uk (82-41-27-158.cable.ubr04.edin.blueyonder.co.uk [82.41.27.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC5943D1D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:06:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrew@cream.org) Received: from cream.org (spatula.flat [192.168.0.2]) by myriad.flat (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27CD8C2; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:59:57 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <4004178D.9060406@cream.org> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:06:37 +0000 From: Andrew Boothman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Adams References: <7E7F3150-45DF-11D8-97CC-000393C505EC@sprynet.com> In-Reply-To: <7E7F3150-45DF-11D8-97CC-000393C505EC@sprynet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New installation: Hanging when trying to dial out X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:06:32 -0000 John Adams wrote: > On Tuesday, January 13, 2004, at 10:29 AM, Andrew Boothman wrote: > >> How are you trying to mount your floppy? "mount -t msdos /dev/fd0 /mnt"? > > > Well, I was just naively trying mount /dev/fd0 /mnt, but now I've tried > it as you suggest, and again gotten "Device not configured". This is > also what fdformat gives me when I try to format the disk. I'm also > unable so far to mount the CD drive. > >> Are your serial ports probed correctly during boot? Look at >> "dmesg|grep cuaa". > > > Now, that's interesting. I get results for sio, but nothing for cuaa or > tty. That's because serial ports _are_ probed as sios - sorry my mistake. I presume you get sio lines for all of your serial ports? My original point still stands, are you sure you're using the right one for where your modem is plugged in? Have you read through http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/dialout.html ? Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 08:13:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F6416A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:13:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C392243D62 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:13:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nkinkade@fastmail.fm) X-Sasl-enc: KNqmBuXpjU1fpOd1u4ZrBw 1074010407 Received: from [206.26.199.146] (unknown [206.27.244.214]) by www.fastmail.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB9A4A58A6; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:13:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from nkinkade by [206.26.199.146] with local (Exim 4.12) id 1AgRAA-000FjC-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:13:06 -0600 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:13:06 -0600 From: Nathan Kinkade To: Gautam Gopalakrishnan Message-ID: <20040113161306.GM5411@npkfbsd> Mail-Followup-To: Gautam Gopalakrishnan , Alex Zivenko , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <000601c3d909$60a86e90$0500a8c0@fire> <20040112200921.GA10661@madras.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="I4g3zIzscEHdx6fd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040112200921.GA10661@madras.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: Nathan Kinkade cc: Alex Zivenko cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xmms - problem - how to fix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nathan Kinkade List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:13:33 -0000 --I4g3zIzscEHdx6fd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 07:09:21AM +1100, Gautam Gopalakrishnan wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 02:24:30PM +0200, Alex Zivenko wrote: > > Hi! > > I have some problem with my xmms mm player. When I'm treing to > > listen some mp3's it gives me aN error, that I don't know how to > > fix. I have KDE 3.1 if you need this info ^) So here it is: > > bash-2.05b$ xmms > > /dev/dsp: Device busy > > /dev/dsp: Device busy > > /* with OSS driver */ > >=20 > > ** WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): > > Device busy > >=20 > > ** WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): > > Device busy > >=20 > > ** WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): > > Device busy /dev/dsp: Device busy >=20 >=20 > I have the same error sometimes when I use mpg123 or mplayer. I don't > have kde or any sound daemon like arts or esound. fstat does not help > too. I just have to wait for sometime for the device to be available > again, maybe a minute. Any ideas, welcome >=20 > Gautam I have also been having this problem on 5.1-RELEASE. I posted about this a month or two ago and found that a couple other people were having the same problem, but nobody seemed to have a solution. My system exhibits this problem with either xmms or mp3blaster and it is seemingly random. Again, `fstat | grep dsp' reveals nothing. I am using blackbox and have no sound daemon of any sort. However, I am recently of the opinion that it may be a memory related issue. I have 256MB of RAM, but my machine is always hovering on being out of physical memory and usually dips into swap. I can consistently resolve the problem by closing, say, Mozilla Firebird to free up some memory. I then relaunch Firebird and am fine for while. Then, after a time, the problem comes back and I can either continually press the play button until it decides to play, or I can close some application. I have no idea whether this is actually some interesting issue relating to swap/memory and the sound device or just a co-incidence. In any case it seems to work. This is an awful workaround, but I don't know what else to do at the moment. Nathan --=20 gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys D8527E49 --I4g3zIzscEHdx6fd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFABBkSO0ZIEthSfkkRAhjBAJwP8nPEnOfYuIfg/JKDx3f6C53xYQCfXUtn QSyAszFdJ7m3O7+48S9KwfM= =bkX4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --I4g3zIzscEHdx6fd-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 08:21:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514BC16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:21:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mirapoint.kettering.edu (mirapoint.kettering.edu [192.138.137.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9B943D1F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:21:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from acheng@member.ams.org) Received: from infinity.kettering.edu (infinity.kettering.edu [198.110.5.123]) by mirapoint.kettering.edu (MOS 3.4.2-CR) with ESMTP id AGC49013; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:21:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from infinity.kettering.edu (localhost.kettering.edu [127.0.0.1]) i0DGOfMN002297 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:24:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from acheng@member.ams.org) Received: from localhost (acheng@localhost)i0DGOfkn002294 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:24:41 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: infinity.kettering.edu: acheng owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:24:41 -0500 (EST) From: Ada Cheng X-X-Sender: acheng@infinity.kettering.edu To: FreeBSD questions Message-ID: <20040113112206.E1709@infinity.kettering.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Unable to read msword documents using kword X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:21:28 -0000 Good morning, I used to be able to read msword documents with kword when I was using KDE2.x. Since upgrading to KDE3.1.4 along with koffice1.2.1, kword simply crashes when attempting to open a word document. Any one knows how to fix this problem? Many thanks. Ada From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 08:38:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426FB16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:38:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from web13811.mail.yahoo.com (web13811.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8950E43D48 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:38:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bencraig@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040113163818.26843.qmail@web13811.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [81.3.108.210] by web13811.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:38:18 GMT Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:38:18 +0000 (GMT) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Ben=20Craig?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Upgrade Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:38:19 -0000 Hi All, I've been running 4.7R on a HP Netserver E60 for some time now, however in trying to upgrade this to 4.9R I've run into a problem that is unfortunately beyond my troubleshooting abilities. Using the ISO disc, I've booted up 4.9 and gone through the upgrade process successfully. However, once the machine reboots after the CD has been removed, the boot process hangs on the following stage: agp0 mem0-0xfffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 Can anyone give me any guideance on what might be causing this? Regards, Ben Craig. ________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 08:40:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF6B16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:40:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from web13806.mail.yahoo.com (web13806.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9C02E43D2F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:40:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bencraig@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040113164003.42050.qmail@web13806.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [81.3.108.210] by web13806.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:40:03 GMT Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:40:03 +0000 (GMT) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Ben=20Craig?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Upgrade Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:40:09 -0000 Hi All, I've been running 4.7R on a HP Netserver E60 for some time now, however in trying to upgrade this to 4.9R I've run into a problem that is unfortunately beyond my troubleshooting abilities. Using the ISO disc, I've booted up 4.9 and gone through the upgrade process successfully. However, once the machine reboots after the CD has been removed, the boot process hangs on the following stage: agp0 mem0-0xfffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 Can anyone give me any guideance on what might be causing this? Regards, Ben Craig. ________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 08:59:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C408216A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:59:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.seekingfire.com (coyote.seekingfire.com [24.72.10.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB3C43D5A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:59:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tillman@seekingfire.com) Received: by mail.seekingfire.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 17D271D5; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:59:31 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:59:31 -0600 From: Tillman Hodgson To: FreeBSD-Questions Message-ID: <20040113165931.GN66765@seekingfire.com> References: <20040112221218.GI66765@seekingfire.com> <44u130lg73.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44u130lg73.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . X-GPG-Key-ID: 828AFC7B X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5584 14BA C9EB 1524 0E68 F543 0F0A 7FBC 828A FC7B X-GPG-Key: http://www.seekingfire.com/gpg_key.asc X-Urban-Legend: There is lots of hidden information in headers Subject: Re: ngctl and rc.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:59:44 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 09:45:20PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Tillman Hodgson writes: > > > Howdy folks, > > > > What's the best way to build ng_one2many interfaces into rc.conf such > > that they're brought up (live) at the "normal" time so that: > > > > 1) configuration remains centralized in rc.conf > > 2) other pieces that depend on a network being present don't fail in > > enlightening ways? > > > > I want to avoid the "make a shell script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d" > > approach. > > Nobody else has written this shell script for you, so you can't just > configure it in rc.conf and turn it on. If you want, you can add it > to rc.network and submit the patches in a PR, so future upgrades will > include it. I'll play around with it and see what I can come up with -- at first blush it doesn't look difficult, just time-consuming to ensure that it fails gracefully under misconfiguration. -T -- "Seeing yourself as you want to be is the key to personal growth." - Unknown From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 09:02:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C94216A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:02:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from ptb-relay03.plus.net (ptb-relay03.plus.net [212.159.14.214]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B9443D75 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:01:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from simong@desktop-guardian.com) Received: from [81.174.227.186] (helo=desktop-guardian.com) by ptb-relay03.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1AgRuZ-0004Yk-Jz for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:01:03 +0000 Received: (qmail 74853 invoked by uid 1006); 13 Jan 2004 17:01:01 -0000 Received: from simong@desktop-guardian.com by dtg25 by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (clamscan: 0.54. spamassassin: 2.55. Clear:. Processed in 112.220207 secs); 13 Jan 2004 17:01:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dtg17) (192.168.0.17) by 192.168.0.25 with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 16:59:06 -0000 Message-ID: <072b01c3d9f6$9cf1f270$1100a8c0@dtg17> From: "Simon Gray" To: "David Meier" , References: <40041172.5070602@daleco.biz> <64730.195.141.214.38.1074009759.squirrel@hiwatt.lognet.ch> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:59:30 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: How "safe" is 5.2 to use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:02:40 -0000 > I understand my question officially can only be answered to still use 4.9. > I just wonder if anyone has used the 5.x for similar services as I plan to > do, successfully or not. > > Dave I run a similar set-up on a 4.8 box (with latest patchlevel) that's stable. I also run another box running 5.0 again with the latest patchlevel - both are stable. (Both Intel board/cpu's) Unless you are after anything particular within the 5.x series, I'd stick with what's stable 4.x branch (not saying that 5.x isn't stable, it's just that not all the bugs may have been found/fixed yet). New features are nice, but not always 100% stable - having said that, personally I'd not had any problems with either. Admittedly haven't tried 5.1 nor 5.2 but still. Might be worth having a closer look at the difference in the two releases and seeing if 5.x will provide any extra features that you'll use. HTH Simon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 09:32:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D519816A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:32:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.datapro.co.za (mail.uskonet.com [196.3.164.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F413843D49 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:31:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hnpatel@autostyle.co.za) Received: from [196.41.196.26] (unknown [196.41.196.26]) by smtp.datapro.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DDE189542 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:31:57 +0200 (SAST) From: Hiren To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1074015147.191.2.camel@fbtab.h3p.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:32:27 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: learning source X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:32:00 -0000 greetings i have studied C++ and am currently going through C. i have been programming small programs in a windows environment. i want to start understanding source and help program for bsd and open source. where can i start, im totally new and i want to know how things work. i need advice thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 09:42:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B8616A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:42:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E145043D39 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:42:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <2004011317424201300879r4e>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:42:42 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 105DF3A; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:42:42 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Ben Craig References: <20040113164003.42050.qmail@web13806.mail.yahoo.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 13 Jan 2004 12:42:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20040113164003.42050.qmail@web13806.mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <44eku3pwxa.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 27 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade Woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:42:44 -0000 Ben Craig writes: > I've been running 4.7R on a HP Netserver E60 for some > time now, however in trying to upgrade this to 4.9R > I've run into a problem that is unfortunately beyond > my troubleshooting abilities. > > Using the ISO disc, I've booted up 4.9 and gone > through the upgrade process successfully. However, > once the machine reboots after the CD has been > removed, the boot process hangs on the following > stage: > > agp0 > mem0-0xfffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 > > Can anyone give me any guideance on what might be > causing this? I've had problems on a machine with a buggy AGP implementation. Try booting your old kernel, installing the kernel source, and building a kernel without the AGP module. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area: resume/CV at http://be-well.ilk.org:8088/~lowell/resume/ username/password "public" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 09:52:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C68116A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:52:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from web60207.mail.yahoo.com (web60207.mail.yahoo.com [216.109.118.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF9E143D72 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:52:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nikita_the_jew@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040113175158.53210.qmail@web60207.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [205.128.215.120] by web60207.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:51:58 PST Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:51:58 -0800 (PST) From: Frederick Thomas To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: freebsd 5.1 and devfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:52:10 -0000 shalom, I read the manpage on devfs and can't make heads or tails of it. I've a cs4236 onboard pnp sound card that took 2 months to finally get running and I'm gonna wait that long this time. My box is a dell optiplex gx1 and using old school rules catted dmesg.boot and found pcm0 but when I tried to run sh MAKEDEV snd0 I find that makedev is now deprecated. please assist in my using devfs to make device nodes please reply to address above. Thanks nikita --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 09:59:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6821116A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:59:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from Vitsch.net (b74143.upc-b.chello.nl [212.83.74.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF12943D73 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 09:59:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Danovitsch@Vitsch.net) Received: from FreeBSD.Danovitsch.LAN (b83007.upc-b.chello.nl [212.83.83.7]) by Vitsch.net (8.12.3p2/8.11.3) with ESMTP id i0DHx5Xe091398; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:59:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Danovitsch@Vitsch.net) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: "Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN]" To: Frederick Thomas Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:59:37 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.3 References: <20040113175158.53210.qmail@web60207.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040113175158.53210.qmail@web60207.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200401131859.37706.Danovitsch@Vitsch.net> cc: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: freebsd 5.1 and devfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:59:31 -0000 On Tuesday 13 January 2004 18:51, Frederick Thomas wrote: > shalom, > I read the manpage on devfs and can't make heads or tails of it. = I've > a cs4236 onboard pnp sound card that took 2 months to finally get runni= ng > and I'm gonna wait that long this time. My box is a dell optiplex gx1 a= nd > using old school rules catted dmesg.boot and found pcm0 but wh= en I > tried to run sh MAKEDEV snd0 I find that makedev is now deprecated. ple= ase > assist in my using devfs to make device nodes please reply to address > above. Thanks If the card is detected as pcm0 and devfs is running, you should have ent= ries =09=09=09=09=09=09 for the device in /dev named dsp* "cat /dev/sndstat" should also list the device. good luck, Daan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 10:07:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBFD16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:07:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B756743D5C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:07:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.103]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20040113180529.HGSF7280.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:05:29 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "John Adams" Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:05:29 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <7E7F3150-45DF-11D8-97CC-000393C505EC@sprynet.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: New installation: Hanging when trying to dial out X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:07:22 -0000 Why don't you start at the beginning and tell us about the PC you installed 4.6 on? Is this an pre Y2K box? What operating system was on it before? Have you ever used the floppy drive before? Does the floppy ready light flash when you power up the PC and boot? What command are you using to try to mount the cd drive? You know the drive works because you installed from it. Have you checked the PC's bio's to verify that the com ports are enabled and the floppy drive is enabled? Is the modem powered up before you boot FBSD? Have you used the modem before? Can you prove it works on another system? Does this command connect to your com port with the external modem? Tip comx where x is the com port number that has modem If it connects enter AT for the hayes attention command. Should reply with OK Use ~ the . keyboard keys to exit tip command. -----Original Message----- From: John Adams [mailto:jadams01@sprynet.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 10:45 AM To: Andrew Boothman Cc: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New installation: Hanging when trying to dial out On Tuesday, January 13, 2004, at 10:29 AM, Andrew Boothman wrote: > How are you trying to mount your floppy? "mount -t msdos /dev/fd0 > /mnt"? Well, I was just naively trying mount /dev/fd0 /mnt, but now I've tried it as you suggest, and again gotten "Device not configured". This is also what fdformat gives me when I try to format the disk. I'm also unable so far to mount the CD drive. > Are your serial ports probed correctly during boot? Look at > "dmesg|grep cuaa". Now, that's interesting. I get results for sio, but nothing for cuaa or tty. All the best, John A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 10:10:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB5E216A4CF for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:10:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0725843D55 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:10:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.103]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20040113181025.JYAO11313.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:10:25 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Frederick Thomas" , Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:10:25 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20040113175158.53210.qmail@web60207.mail.yahoo.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: RE: freebsd 5.1 and devfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:10:27 -0000 In 5.x devices are automatically built for you on first use. That is just one of the changes between 4.x and 5.x. THAT IS WHY MAKEDEV DOES NOT WORK FOR YOU. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Frederick Thomas Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 12:52 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: freebsd 5.1 and devfs shalom, I read the manpage on devfs and can't make heads or tails of it. I've a cs4236 onboard pnp sound card that took 2 months to finally get running and I'm gonna wait that long this time. My box is a dell optiplex gx1 and using old school rules catted dmesg.boot and found pcm0 but when I tried to run sh MAKEDEV snd0 I find that makedev is now deprecated. please assist in my using devfs to make device nodes please reply to address above. Thanks nikita --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 10:28:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFAC16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:28:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from pursued-with.net (adsl-66-125-9-242.dsl.sndg02.pacbell.net [66.125.9.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5109343D55 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:28:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net) Received: from babelfish.pursued-with.net (babelfish.pursued-with.net [192.168.168.42]) by pursued-with.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4163085210; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:30:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:30:19 -0800 (PST) From: Kevin Stevens To: Kirk Strauser In-Reply-To: <87hdyzj16w.fsf@strauser.com> Message-ID: References: <87hdyzj16w.fsf@strauser.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6 and multiple interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:28:42 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Kirk Strauser wrote: > I'm using an IPv6 tunnel to Hurricane Electric on my FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE > firewall. That firewall has multiple Ethernet interfaces. Should each of > those interfaces be assigned a routable IPv6 address? And what *is* If you want them to carry IPv6 traffic. To phrase it differently, you shouldn't use the same IPv6 address on multiple interfaces, but you don't have to run IPv6 on all interfaces. > "link-local"? Is there a decent (English language) FAQ that's readable by > technical users who aren't networking experts? http://www.ipv6.org/ http://www.v6.wide.ad.jp/ KeS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 10:33:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DEB116A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:33:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1947743D58 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:33:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i0DIXAi05624; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:33:10 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: "Vahric MUHTARYAN" , "'Andrew L. Gould'" Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:33:10 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401131033.10065.kstewart@owt.com> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Whan can I do if OS does not boot after makeworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:33:26 -0000 On Tuesday 13 January 2004 07:31 am, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > Did you ever have any problem about makeworld process ?! > I afraid of one day will come and I can't boot my FreeBSD Go back and read the archive on problems updating from 5.1 to 5.2. The statfs problem would render your system unbootable if you did an installworld before you booted to an updated and installed kernel. Kent > > Vahric > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew L. Gould [mailto:algould@datawok.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:31 PM > To: Vahric MUHTARYAN; 'Ruben de Groot' > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Whan can I do if OS does not boot after makeworld > > On Tuesday 13 January 2004 07:02 am, Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote: > > Hi , > > > > I did not make something now and I don't have a problem with makeworld. > > But > > > I red something in FreeBSD from scratch and I saw that some problem can > > occur and after makeworld process OS is not openinig .... > > > > Vahric > > This is not going to sound very helpful; but if you're trying to be > proactive.......read the documentation thoroughly and follow the steps > carefully. Don't cut corners or make mistakes. > > Unless you can predict the error, it's hard to predict the solution. > > Best regards, > > Andrew Gould > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 11:08:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90E216A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:08:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao05.cox.net (lakemtao05.cox.net [68.1.17.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CF743D55 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:08:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com) Received: from vixen42 ([68.109.49.234]) by lakemtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20040113190841.NRP29834.lakemtao05.cox.net@vixen42> for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:08:41 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:07:20 -0600 From: Vulpes Velox To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040113130720.6dfd6061@vixen42.> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: problems creating a bootable image using burncd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:08:46 -0000 I've been trying to create a a bootable CD using freesbie. I ran into problems getting that to work. It failed to boot and the same thing happened upon reburn. I then went to download a the 4.9 install iso to see if it was a possible problem with the image that was created. The iso passed the check sum, but after burning it, it would not boot too. I've managed to verify that it is possible of booting from that drive using a old win98 install disc I have laying around. The install for that comes up fine. I've also tried it at different speeds and have gotten the same results. Any ideas? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 11:16:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CCC16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:16:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from razorbill.mail.pas.earthlink.net (razorbill.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DC643D58 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:16:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 22-15.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.22.15] helo=yoda.datawok.com) by razorbill.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AgU1G-0001L8-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:16:06 -0800 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: Vulpes Velox , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:16:06 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20040113130720.6dfd6061@vixen42.> In-Reply-To: <20040113130720.6dfd6061@vixen42.> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401131316.07101.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4bf7d80467bda800b8645c92d052d68a35350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Subject: Re: problems creating a bootable image using burncd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:16:51 -0000 On Tuesday 13 January 2004 01:07 pm, Vulpes Velox wrote: > I've been trying to create a a bootable CD using freesbie. I ran into > problems getting that to work. It failed to boot and the same thing > happened upon reburn. > > I then went to download a the 4.9 install iso to see if it was a possible > problem with the image that was created. The iso passed the check sum, but > after burning it, it would not boot too. > > I've managed to verify that it is possible of booting from that drive using > a old win98 install disc I have laying around. The install for that comes > up fine. > > I've also tried it at different speeds and have gotten the same results. > > > Any ideas? Have you mounted the CD and viewed the contents to make sure the CD was good? I remember having problems with a box of generic CD's once. Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 11:26:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0274E16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:26:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFBD843D7C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:26:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ph.schulz@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 2878 invoked by uid 65534); 13 Jan 2004 19:26:31 -0000 Received: from p5083C3FA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO gmx.de) (80.131.195.250) by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 20:26:31 +0100 X-Authenticated: #1954550 Message-ID: <4004466A.20509@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:26:34 +0100 From: "Ph. Schulz" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <21321.1073904325@www46.gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <21321.1073904325@www46.gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [OT] Configuration file parsing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:26:36 -0000 Thank you all for your input, I really appreciate it. Somebody said that I would be fine (when using GPL-licensed stuff) as long as I provide the sources to people who use the application. I guess providing the source within the company is not a problem, however I thought it would be easier to use BSD-style licensed stuff. Thanks again, Phil. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 11:40:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A490716A4CF for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:40:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.eskimo.com (mx1.eskimo.com [204.122.16.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78B1C43D31 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:40:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ripper@eskimo.com) Received: from eskimo.com (ripper@eskimo.com [204.122.16.13]) by mx1.eskimo.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA24360 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:40:31 -0800 Received: (from ripper@localhost) by eskimo.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id LAA04628 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:40:30 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:40:30 -0800 From: Ross Lippert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040113114030.A4060@eskimo.eskimo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i WWW-Home-Page: http://www.eskimo.com/~ripper Subject: fetch/ftp problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:40:35 -0000 I am having an odd problem with fetch. I cannot fetch an ftp:-type address but I can ftp to it and get the files just fine. This is problematic for ports and downloading via sysinstall. I am running the new 5.2. I am firewalled though (I did try both passsive and active ftpmode's). Any advice on how to further debug? -r From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 11:42:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6944816A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:42:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2F543D67 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:42:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from pooh.strauser.com (pooh.honeypot.net [10.0.5.128]) by kanga.honeypot.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0DJgT2J041444 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:42:31 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <21321.1073904325@www46.gmx.net> <4004466A.20509@gmx.de> From: Kirk Strauser Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:42:27 -0600 In-Reply-To: <4004466A.20509@gmx.de> (Ph. Schulz's message of "Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:26:34 +0100") Message-ID: <87brp7iqjg.fsf@strauser.com> Lines: 22 X-Mailer: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: [OT] Configuration file parsing X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:42:54 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2004-01-13T19:26:34Z, "Ph. Schulz" writes: > Somebody said that I would be fine (when using GPL-licensed stuff) as long > as I provide the sources to people who use the application. I guess > providing the source within the company is not a problem... No. Again, no. An entity does not have to make source available unless it distributes the product to another entity. You can build proprietary software using GPL components as long as you do not distribute *outside your company*. If it stays internal, you have no legal or moral obligation to make your source available. Yes, using BSD libraries avoids the problem, but the GPL isn't as restrictive as you're making it sound. =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser "94 outdated ports on the box, 94 outdated ports. Portupgrade one, an hour 'til done, 82 outdated ports on the box." --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBABEol5sRg+Y0CpvERAlpvAJkBsYTu/bX+ZyPH9aim89CI2z2xmwCgmL3p SvyAdrc99+Bb6kTRD7FAQNo= =nrw3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 11:45:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C25816A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:45:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from catseye.mine.nu (d207-81-17-215.bchsia.telus.net [207.81.17.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4973E43D45 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:45:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from catseye@catseye.mine.nu) Received: (qmail 99117 invoked by uid 1001); 13 Jan 2004 19:49:56 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:49:56 -0800 From: Chris Pressey To: Vulpes Velox Message-Id: <20040113114956.50388ea3.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: <20040113130720.6dfd6061@vixen42.> References: <20040113130720.6dfd6061@vixen42.> Organization: Cat's Eye Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems creating a bootable image using burncd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:45:42 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:07:20 -0600 Vulpes Velox wrote: > I've been trying to create a a bootable CD using freesbie. I ran into > problems getting that to work. It failed to boot and the same thing > happened upon reburn. > > I then went to download a the 4.9 install iso to see if it was a > possible problem with the image that was created. The iso passed the > check sum, but after burning it, it would not boot too. > > I've managed to verify that it is possible of booting from that drive > using a old win98 install disc I have laying around. The install for > that comes up fine. > > I've also tried it at different speeds and have gotten the same > results. > > > Any ideas? What method are you using to burn the CD? If it's a method that's worked for you in the past, it sounds like you might have some flaky CD-R's. (Also note: there's a problem with the current FreeSBIE scripts for creating working 4.x FreeSBIEs. They fail to copy a required file onto the CD - and when they do, it still won't detect your hard drives without another minor change. I've posted patches to the freesbie mailing list that fix these problems, you might want to apply them before trying to make another FreeSBIE.) -Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 11:48:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 507FD16A4CF for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:48:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1357843D49 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:48:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from pooh.strauser.com (pooh.honeypot.net [10.0.5.128]) by kanga.honeypot.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0DJmn2J041762; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:48:49 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) To: Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net References: <87hdyzj16w.fsf@strauser.com> From: Kirk Strauser Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:48:46 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Kevin Stevens's message of "Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:30:19 -0800 (PST)") Message-ID: <8765ffiq8x.fsf@strauser.com> Lines: 26 X-Mailer: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6 and multiple interfaces X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:48:54 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At 2004-01-13T18:30:19Z, Kevin Stevens wri= tes: > If you want them to carry IPv6 traffic. To phrase it differently, you > shouldn't use the same IPv6 address on multiple interfaces, but you don't > have to run IPv6 on all interfaces. Gotcha. OK, back to being on-topic for FreeBSD: how would I assign v6 addresses to those interfaces? I'm running rtadvd on that machine and it's my understanding that sending and accepting advertisements on the same host is a no-no. Should I just give them all static assignments in /etc/rc.conf? And is there any suggested way for "inventing" the addresses for those interfaces? >> "link-local"? Is there a decent (English language) FAQ that's readable >> by technical users who aren't networking experts? > http://www.ipv6.org/ That refers to: > http://www.v6.wide.ad.jp/ ...which does not resolve. :-/ =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBABEuh5sRg+Y0CpvERAsZ8AJ9I9IPEPWGe4fbcfaKOOqbeB9ni5wCfSBuI orKJNo7PQtvx6WHaoMTQx1k= =yMTM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 12:20:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8479116A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:20:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from fubard.zapto.org (modemcable005.194-202-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.202.194.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B7743D54 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:20:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rwong10@cs.mcgill.ca) Received: from geminga.my.fubard.ca (na@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fubard.zapto.org (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i0DKK1eT071308 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:20:01 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rwong10@cs.mcgill.ca) Received: from localhost (mout@localhost)i0DKK0xq071305 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:20:01 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: geminga.my.fubard.ca: mout owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:20:00 -0500 (EST) From: rwong10 X-X-Sender: mout@geminga.my.fubard.ca To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040113122517.J68797@geminga.my.fubard.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: diskless setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:20:19 -0000 Hello, I am still trying to figure out why I can't boot diskless. I've followed the instructions in the handbook and the clone_root script. While trying to figure out a problem, I think it may be a problem with creating the mfs partition in memory. I get: mount_mfs: /etc: bad file system size Some insight would be nice... r From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 12:35:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598FD16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:35:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from studnet.sk (kripel.unitra.sk [193.87.12.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD19C43D54 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:35:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rado@kripel.studnet.sk) Received: from kripel.studnet.sk (rado@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by studnet.sk (8.12.10/angel's version) with ESMTP id i0DKZbjD011472 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:35:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rado@kripel.studnet.sk) Received: (from rado@localhost) by kripel.studnet.sk (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i0DKZbdY011422 for questions@freeBSD.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:35:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rado) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:35:37 +0100 From: Radko Keves To: questions@freeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040113203537.GA8699@studnet.edu.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=3.0 tests=RADO_SUBJECT19 autolearn=no version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-cvs (1.188-2003-05-24-exp) on kripel.studnet.sk Subject: newsyslog.conf in 5.x and bz2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:35:45 -0000 hi can i change compression type from bzip2 to gzip when syslog rotate files? i can't find it nowhere. i know that bzip2 is better, but i need gzip. thank and bye -- "The ancient Greeks' concept of a ``personal daemon'' was similar to the modern concept of a ``guardian angel'' --- ``eudaemonia'' is the state of being helped or protected by a kindly spirit. As a rule, UNIX systems seem to be infested with both daemons and demons." [Evi Nemeth] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 12:36:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7A516A54B for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:36:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao05.cox.net (lakemtao05.cox.net [68.1.17.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C8443D55 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:36:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com) Received: from vixen42 ([68.109.49.234]) by lakemtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20040113203613.BCQV29834.lakemtao05.cox.net@vixen42>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:36:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:34:51 -0600 From: Vulpes Velox To: "Andrew L. Gould" Message-Id: <20040113143451.504c9652@vixen42.> In-Reply-To: <200401131316.07101.algould@datawok.com> References: <20040113130720.6dfd6061@vixen42.> <200401131316.07101.algould@datawok.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems creating a bootable image using burncd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:36:17 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:16:06 -0600 "Andrew L. Gould" wrote: > On Tuesday 13 January 2004 01:07 pm, Vulpes Velox wrote: > > I've been trying to create a a bootable CD using freesbie. I ran into > > problems getting that to work. It failed to boot and the same thing > > happened upon reburn. > > > > I then went to download a the 4.9 install iso to see if it was a possible > > problem with the image that was created. The iso passed the check sum, but > > after burning it, it would not boot too. > > > > I've managed to verify that it is possible of booting from that drive using > > a old win98 install disc I have laying around. The install for that comes > > up fine. > > > > I've also tried it at different speeds and have gotten the same results. > > > > > > Any ideas? > > Have you mounted the CD and viewed the contents to make sure the CD was good? > > I remember having problems with a box of generic CD's once. Yeah, I can view the contents with out any problem and the brand of CD-RWs I am using is Memorex. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 12:39:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7C916A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:39:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from spock.dilkie.com (spock.dilkie.com [206.51.1.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1547543D2D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:39:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lee@dilkie.com) Received: from borg (borg.dilkie.com [206.51.1.193]) (authenticated bits=0) by spock.dilkie.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0DKcveM019897 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:38:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from lee@dilkie.com) From: "Lee Dilkie" To: "'Chris Pressey'" , "'Vulpes Velox'" Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:38:55 -0500 Message-ID: <008a01c3da15$443e2e40$c10133ce@dilkie.com> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: <20040113114956.50388ea3.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> Importance: Normal X-Spam-Score: () 0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: problems creating a bootable image using burncd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:39:34 -0000 > On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:07:20 -0600 > Vulpes Velox wrote: > > > I've been trying to create a a bootable CD using freesbie. > I ran into > > problems getting that to work. It failed to boot and the same thing > > happened upon reburn. > > > > I then went to download a the 4.9 install iso to see if it was a > > possible problem with the image that was created. The iso passed the > > check sum, but after burning it, it would not boot too. > > > > I've managed to verify that it is possible of booting from > that drive > > using a old win98 install disc I have laying around. The install for > > that comes up fine. > > > > I've also tried it at different speeds and have gotten the same > > results. > > > > > > Any ideas? > > What method are you using to burn the CD? If it's a method that's > worked for you in the past, it sounds like you might have some flaky > CD-R's. > I seem to recall a discussion some months ago regarding a change to the way boot CDs were made. This had the effect of breaking bootable CDs when using older BIOSes that only knew about the "old" way of booting from CD. Pardon my vagueness. I thought this was a 5.x issue but perhaps it was/is a 4.9 issue as well. -lee From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 12:46:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA8416A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:46:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao07.cox.net (lakemtao07.cox.net [68.1.17.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446C443D73 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:45:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com) Received: from vixen42 ([68.109.49.234]) by lakemtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20040113204553.LVPN2432.lakemtao07.cox.net@vixen42>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:45:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:44:31 -0600 From: Vulpes Velox To: Chris Pressey Message-Id: <20040113144431.5d0d9b27@vixen42.> In-Reply-To: <20040113114956.50388ea3.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> References: <20040113130720.6dfd6061@vixen42.> <20040113114956.50388ea3.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems creating a bootable image using burncd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:46:15 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 11:49:56 -0800 Chris Pressey wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:07:20 -0600 > Vulpes Velox wrote: > > > I've been trying to create a a bootable CD using freesbie. I ran into > > problems getting that to work. It failed to boot and the same thing > > happened upon reburn. > > > > I then went to download a the 4.9 install iso to see if it was a > > possible problem with the image that was created. The iso passed the > > check sum, but after burning it, it would not boot too. > > > > I've managed to verify that it is possible of booting from that drive > > using a old win98 install disc I have laying around. The install for > > that comes up fine. > > > > I've also tried it at different speeds and have gotten the same > > results. > > > > > > Any ideas? > > What method are you using to burn the CD? If it's a method that's > worked for you in the past, it sounds like you might have some flaky > CD-R's. % burncd -v -s 4 -f /dev/acd0c data 4.9-i386-disc1.iso fixate adding type 0x08 file 4.9-i386-disc1.iso size 655680 KB 327840 blocks next writeable LBA 0 addr = 0 size = 671416320 blocks = 327840 writing from file 4.9-i386-disc1.iso size 655680 KB written this track 655680 KB (100%) total 655680 KB fixating CD, please wait.. The brand I have been using has been Memorex for CD-RW discs.... Just tried it with some TDK discs and it works perfectly. So I am guessing there was something flaky about the Memorex discs I have been messing with. > (Also note: there's a problem with the current FreeSBIE scripts for > creating working 4.x FreeSBIEs. They fail to copy a required file onto > the CD - and when they do, it still won't detect your hard drives > without another minor change. I've posted patches to the freesbie > mailing list that fix these problems, you might want to apply them > before trying to make another FreeSBIE.) Yeah, but if that was the case I should still be able to boot using a burned copy of 4.9R. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 12:51:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEBF16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:51:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao07.cox.net (lakemtao07.cox.net [68.1.17.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2960443D5D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:50:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kitbsdlists@HotPOP.com) Received: from vixen42 ([68.109.49.234]) by lakemtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20040113205024.LWJF2432.lakemtao07.cox.net@vixen42>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:50:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:49:02 -0600 From: Vulpes Velox To: "Andrew L. Gould" Message-Id: <20040113144902.1e5d2db1@vixen42.> In-Reply-To: <200401131316.07101.algould@datawok.com> References: <20040113130720.6dfd6061@vixen42.> <200401131316.07101.algould@datawok.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problems creating a bootable image using burncd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:51:26 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:16:06 -0600 "Andrew L. Gould" wrote: > On Tuesday 13 January 2004 01:07 pm, Vulpes Velox wrote: > > I've been trying to create a a bootable CD using freesbie. I ran into > > problems getting that to work. It failed to boot and the same thing > > happened upon reburn. > > > > I then went to download a the 4.9 install iso to see if it was a possible > > problem with the image that was created. The iso passed the check sum, but > > after burning it, it would not boot too. > > > > I've managed to verify that it is possible of booting from that drive using > > a old win98 install disc I have laying around. The install for that comes > > up fine. > > > > I've also tried it at different speeds and have gotten the same results. > > > > > > Any ideas? > > Have you mounted the CD and viewed the contents to make sure the CD was good? > > I remember having problems with a box of generic CD's once. Really wierd... Just tried it with some TDK CDRs I just remembered I had sitting around and it worked first try... the Memorex CDRWs and the Durabrand CDRs did not work what so ever :/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 12:54:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5739416A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:54:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao07.cox.net (lakemtao07.cox.net [68.1.17.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25BE743D41 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:54:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kitsune@gmx.co.uk) Received: from vixen42 ([68.109.49.234]) by lakemtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20040113205438.LXBF2432.lakemtao07.cox.net@vixen42> for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:54:38 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:53:16 -0600 From: kitsune To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040113145316.44729ab3@vixen42.> In-Reply-To: <20040113130720.6dfd6061@vixen42.> References: <20040113130720.6dfd6061@vixen42.> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: problems creating a bootable image using burncd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:54:41 -0000 Well solved my problem... used some TDK discs and those worked fine... I could not get the Memorex CDRWs or the Durabrand CDRs to make bootable discs what so ever... Any one know if there are some CDR/CDRW discs which it is impossible to make bootable discs out of or is this just some type of weird fluke and I should quite possibly be worried about the data integrety of any thing stored on discs of the other two brands. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 13:03:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D8A16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:03:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FCFA43D49 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:03:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20040113210333012006nhgie>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:03:33 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 2C02C3A; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:03:33 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Radko Keves References: <20040113203537.GA8699@studnet.edu.eu.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 13 Jan 2004 16:03:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20040113203537.GA8699@studnet.edu.eu.org> Message-ID: <44y8sbftne.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: questions@freeBSD.org Subject: Re: newsyslog.conf in 5.x and bz2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:03:35 -0000 Radko Keves writes: > can i change compression type from bzip2 to gzip when syslog > rotate files? Yes. > i can't find it nowhere. Really? It's right in the manual for newsyslog(8). You just use a 'Z' flag instead of 'J'. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 13:25:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B331316A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:25:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.rtl.org (rtl-3.i2k.com [63.94.12.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D05A843D2F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:25:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jstewart@rtl.org) Received: from mis3c.rtl.lan (rtl-2.i2k.com [63.94.12.206]) by mail.rtl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E86730ADB; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:24:25 -0500 (EST) Received: by mis3c.rtl.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id B38804FD1; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:23:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:23:22 -0500 From: Jason Stewart To: Lowell Gilbert Message-ID: <20040113212322.GC1100@rtl.org> Mail-Followup-To: Lowell Gilbert , Radko Keves , questions@freeBSD.org References: <20040113203537.GA8699@studnet.edu.eu.org> <44y8sbftne.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44y8sbftne.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Radko Keves cc: questions@freeBSD.org Subject: Re: newsyslog.conf in 5.x and bz2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:25:52 -0000 On 13/01/04 16:03 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Radko Keves writes: > > > can i change compression type from bzip2 to gzip when syslog > > rotate files? > > Yes. > > > i can't find it nowhere. > > Really? It's right in the manual for newsyslog(8). > You just use a 'Z' flag instead of 'J'. Just to avoid confusion, it's J for bzip2 and Z for gzip From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 13:26:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3923F16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:26:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.indatacorp.com (65.104.0.66.ptr.us.xo.net [65.104.0.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F14C43D6E for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:26:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rgrafton@indatacorp.com) Received: (qmail 28999 invoked by uid 89); 13 Jan 2004 21:35:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ITDept) (rgrafton@indatacorp.com@192.168.100.119) by 0 with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 21:35:32 -0000 From: "Randy Grafton" To: Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:33:38 -0700 Message-ID: <003701c3da1c$e845e4e0$7764a8c0@ITDept> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Apache2 and mod_perl2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:26:56 -0000 I have just installed FreeBSD 4.9 and am having problems with Apache2 = and mod_perl2. I used the ports, which was updated immediately after install, and did a 'make install clean' for both apache2 and mod_perl2, more specifically apache-2.0.48_2 and mod_perl2-1.99r12. I have not gotten fancy yet and have only included the following lines = in my httpd.conf for mod_perl2: LoadModule perl_module libexec/apache2/mod_perl.so PerlModule Apache2 The problem is that when I do '/usr/local/etc/rc.d/apache2.sh start' the machine just hangs, for a long time (4-8 minutes), before apache finally comes up. I checked the logs and there aren't any negative entries. I recently had to down system to move it, upon reboot it hung for 45 = minutes before I had to kill the 'apache.sh start/apachectl start/httpd -k = start' processes. When I say hung I don't mean the entire system, just the = startup processes of apache2. I have slightly older versions on a 4.8 box that was installed = identically to what was described here and all is fine. Any ideas? Thanks, -Randy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 13:31:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC4F16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:31:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from m00.ca.astound.net (m00.ca.astound.net [64.85.239.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D649C43D2D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:31:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rchopra@cal.berkeley.edu) Received: from cal.berkeley.edu (astound-64-85-244-72.ca.astound.net [64.85.244.72]) by m00.ca.astound.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0DLUjKL030202; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:30:46 -0800 Message-ID: <40046367.3050305@cal.berkeley.edu> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:30:15 -0800 From: Rishi Chopra User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruben de Groot References: <4003126E.5030107@cal.berkeley.edu> <20040113115550.GB23956@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040113122853.GD57681@ei.bzerk.org> In-Reply-To: <20040113122853.GD57681@ei.bzerk.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: FreeBSD, SSH and "Enter Authentication Response" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:31:43 -0000 I've included copies of my /etc/ssh/ssh_config file and /etc/pam.d/ssh - I'm running a default minimal installation of FreeBSD 5.2: etc/ssh/ssh_config: # $FreeBSD: src/crypto/openssh/ssh_config,v 1.21 2003/04/23 17:10:53 des Exp $ # This is the ssh client system-wide configuration file. See # ssh_config(5) for more information. This file provides defaults for # users, and the values can be changed in per-user configuration files # or on the command line. # Configuration data is parsed as follows: # 1. command line options # 2. user-specific file # 3. system-wide file # Any configuration value is only changed the first time it is set. # Thus, host-specific definitions should be at the beginning of the # configuration file, and defaults at the end. # Site-wide defaults for various options # Host * # ForwardAgent no # ForwardX11 no # RhostsAuthentication no # RhostsRSAAuthentication no # RSAAuthentication yes # PasswordAuthentication yes # HostbasedAuthentication no # BatchMode no # CheckHostIP no # StrictHostKeyChecking ask # IdentityFile ~/.ssh/identity # IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa # IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_dsa # Port 22 # Protocol 2,1 # Cipher 3des # Ciphers aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc # EscapeChar ~ # VersionAddendum FreeBSD-20030423 /etc/pam.d/ssh # # $FreeBSD: src/etc/pam.d/sshd,v 1.15 2003/04/30 21:57:54 markm Exp $ # # PAM configuration for the "sshd" service # # auth auth required pam_nologin.so no_warn auth sufficient pam_opie.so no_warn no_fake_prompts auth requisite pam_opieaccess.so no_warn allow_local #auth sufficient pam_krb5.so no_warn try_first_pass #auth sufficient pam_ssh.so no_warn try_first_pass auth required pam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass # account #account required pam_krb5.so account required pam_login_access.so account required pam_unix.so # session #session optional pam_ssh.so session required pam_permit.so # password #password sufficient pam_krb5.so no_warn try_first_pass password required pam_unix.so no_warn try_first_pass Any ideas what I should change? -Rishi Ruben de Groot wrote: >On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:55:50AM +0000, Matthew Seaman typed: > > >>On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 01:32:30PM -0800, Rishi Chopra wrote: >> >> >>>I have a nitpicky question about logging into a FreeBSD machine and >>>SSH. I'm using a minimal FreeBSD install and SSH Secure Shell client >>>v3.2.0 - the crux of the problem is I am unable to "smoothly" login. >>> >>> >>Which FreeBSD version? And are you running the OpenSSH server >>supplied with the system or one from ports? >> >> > >Judging by name and version number, I think he's not running OpenSSH >at all, but the other ssh implementation from ssh.org > > > >>>When I login to my machine, I'm prompted to enter an "authentication >>>response". A window is displayed with "Enter Authentication Response" >>>in the title bar, and two buttons at the bottom ('OK' and 'Cancel') - >>>the text says: >>> >>> Enter your authentication response. >>> Password: >>> >>> >>Sounds like you've got the PAM based challenge-response authentication >>enabled in your /etc/ssh/sshd_config (which is the default), but >>your /etc/pam.conf (FreeBSD 4.x) or /etc/pam.d (FreeBSD 5.x) has a >>modified configuration. >> >>Here are a couple of things to try -- >> >>Turn off Challenge-response authentication in /etc/ssh/sshd_config >> >>Change: >> >> #ChallengeResponseAuthentication yes >> >>to >> >> ChallengeResponseAuthentication no >> >>and then: >> >> # kill -HUP `cat /var/run/sshd.pid` >> >>to get it to reread the config. >> >> -- or -- >> >>Double check the PAM settings: they should look like this in /etc/pam.conf >> >> # OpenSSH with PAM support requires similar modules. The session one is >> # a bit strange, though... >> sshd auth sufficient pam_skey.so >> sshd auth sufficient pam_opie.so no_fake_prompts >> #sshd auth requisite pam_opieaccess.so >> #sshd auth sufficient pam_kerberosIV.so try_first_pass >> #sshd auth sufficient pam_krb5.so try_first_pass >> sshd auth required pam_unix.so try_first_pass >> sshd account required pam_unix.so >> sshd password required pam_permit.so >> sshd session required pam_permit.so >> >>The /etc/pam.d case is similar, except you should have a file called >>'sshd' in that directory, whose contents are similar, but without the >>'sshd' entries in the first column. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew >> >> >>-- >>Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks >> Savill Way >>PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow >>Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK >> >> > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 13:55:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB99616A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:55:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A75743D3F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:55:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0DLuso9064497; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:56:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0DLus2f064496; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:56:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ei.bzerk.org: bulk set sender to mail25@bzerk.org using -f Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:56:54 +0100 From: Ruben de Groot To: Rishi Chopra Message-ID: <20040113215654.GA64436@ei.bzerk.org> References: <4003126E.5030107@cal.berkeley.edu> <20040113115550.GB23956@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040113122853.GD57681@ei.bzerk.org> <40046367.3050305@cal.berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40046367.3050305@cal.berkeley.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Ruben de Groot cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: FreeBSD, SSH and "Enter Authentication Response" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:55:20 -0000 On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:30:15PM -0800, Rishi Chopra typed: > I've included copies of my /etc/ssh/ssh_config file and /etc/pam.d/ssh - > I'm running a default minimal installation of FreeBSD 5.2: > > etc/ssh/ssh_config: > > # Host * > # ForwardAgent no > # ForwardX11 no > # RhostsAuthentication no > # RhostsRSAAuthentication no > # RSAAuthentication yes > # PasswordAuthentication yes > # HostbasedAuthentication no As Matthew suggested, you can put the line ChallengeResponseAuthentication no in here. Then restart sshd good luck, Ruben > # BatchMode no > # CheckHostIP no > # StrictHostKeyChecking ask > # IdentityFile ~/.ssh/identity > # IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_rsa > # IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_dsa > # Port 22 > # Protocol 2,1 > # Cipher 3des > # Ciphers > aes128-cbc,3des-cbc,blowfish-cbc,cast128-cbc,arcfour,aes192-cbc,aes256-cbc > # EscapeChar ~ > # VersionAddendum FreeBSD-20030423 > > > /etc/pam.d/ssh > > # > # $FreeBSD: src/etc/pam.d/sshd,v 1.15 2003/04/30 21:57:54 markm Exp $ > # > # PAM configuration for the "sshd" service > # > > # auth > auth required pam_nologin.so no_warn > auth sufficient pam_opie.so no_warn > no_fake_prompts > auth requisite pam_opieaccess.so no_warn allow_local > #auth sufficient pam_krb5.so no_warn > try_first_pass > #auth sufficient pam_ssh.so no_warn > try_first_pass > auth required pam_unix.so no_warn > try_first_pass > > # account > #account required pam_krb5.so > account required pam_login_access.so > account required pam_unix.so > > # session > #session optional pam_ssh.so > session required pam_permit.so > > # password > #password sufficient pam_krb5.so no_warn > try_first_pass > password required pam_unix.so no_warn > try_first_pass > > > Any ideas what I should change? > > -Rishi > > Ruben de Groot wrote: > > >On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 11:55:50AM +0000, Matthew Seaman typed: > > > > > >>On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 01:32:30PM -0800, Rishi Chopra wrote: > >> > >> > >>>I have a nitpicky question about logging into a FreeBSD machine and > >>>SSH. I'm using a minimal FreeBSD install and SSH Secure Shell client > >>>v3.2.0 - the crux of the problem is I am unable to "smoothly" login. > >>> > >>> > >>Which FreeBSD version? And are you running the OpenSSH server > >>supplied with the system or one from ports? > >> > >> > > > >Judging by name and version number, I think he's not running OpenSSH > >at all, but the other ssh implementation from ssh.org > > > > > > > >>>When I login to my machine, I'm prompted to enter an "authentication > >>>response". A window is displayed with "Enter Authentication Response" > >>>in the title bar, and two buttons at the bottom ('OK' and 'Cancel') - > >>>the text says: > >>> > >>> Enter your authentication response. > >>> Password: > >>> > >>> > >>Sounds like you've got the PAM based challenge-response authentication > >>enabled in your /etc/ssh/sshd_config (which is the default), but > >>your /etc/pam.conf (FreeBSD 4.x) or /etc/pam.d (FreeBSD 5.x) has a > >>modified configuration. > >> > >>Here are a couple of things to try -- > >> > >>Turn off Challenge-response authentication in /etc/ssh/sshd_config > >> > >>Change: > >> > >> #ChallengeResponseAuthentication yes > >> > >>to > >> > >> ChallengeResponseAuthentication no > >> > >>and then: > >> > >> # kill -HUP `cat /var/run/sshd.pid` > >> > >>to get it to reread the config. > >> > >>-- or -- > >> > >>Double check the PAM settings: they should look like this in /etc/pam.conf > >> > >> # OpenSSH with PAM support requires similar modules. The session one > >> is > >> # a bit strange, though... > >> sshd auth sufficient pam_skey.so > >> sshd auth sufficient pam_opie.so > >> no_fake_prompts > >> #sshd auth requisite pam_opieaccess.so > >> #sshd auth sufficient pam_kerberosIV.so > >> try_first_pass > >> #sshd auth sufficient pam_krb5.so > >> try_first_pass > >> sshd auth required pam_unix.so > >> try_first_pass > >> sshd account required pam_unix.so > >> sshd password required pam_permit.so > >> sshd session required pam_permit.so > >> > >>The /etc/pam.d case is similar, except you should have a file called > >>'sshd' in that directory, whose contents are similar, but without the > >>'sshd' entries in the first column. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Matthew > >> > >> > >>-- > >>Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks > >> Savill Way > >>PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow > >>Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK > >> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 13:56:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030CF16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:56:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425BF43D2F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:56:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i0DLtpfn070064 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:55:51 GMT (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i0DLtpNh070063; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:55:51 GMT (envelope-from matthew) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:55:51 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman To: Rishi Chopra Message-ID: <20040113215551.GA69353@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Rishi Chopra , Ruben de Groot , questions@freebsd.org References: <4003126E.5030107@cal.berkeley.edu> <20040113115550.GB23956@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040113122853.GD57681@ei.bzerk.org> <40046367.3050305@cal.berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40046367.3050305@cal.berkeley.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: Ruben de Groot cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD, SSH and "Enter Authentication Response" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:56:05 -0000 --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:30:15PM -0800, Rishi Chopra wrote: > I've included copies of my /etc/ssh/ssh_config file and /etc/pam.d/ssh -= =20 > I'm running a default minimal installation of FreeBSD 5.2: =20 > etc/ssh/ssh_config: Um... /etc/ssh/sshd_config is more to the point -- ssh_config is for the client side, ssh*d*_config is for the server side. However if you've just installed the system then chances are the sshd_config is unmodified from the default settings. Try turning off the challenge-response stuff as I suggested in my earlier e-mail. ie. make it so that sshd_config contains: ChallengeResponseAuthentication no > /etc/pam.d/ssh That looks fine. Hmmm... This does look like a peculiar interaction of your particular SSH client software and the OpenSSH server code on FreeBSD. Normally I'd suggest running the client side connection with debugging turned up high, eg: % ssh -v -v -v host.example.com but I don't know what the equivalent of that is for the client software you're using. A very good diagnostic test though is to run the server side with the debugging turned up. A good trick is to run it on an alternative port so you can run it in parallel with your regular sshd. eg: # sshd -d -d -d -p 24 You can then connect to the alternate port by: % ssh host.example.com:24 This will produce quite a lot of output, and exit after the ssh session. By comparing this output to the equivalent output from a machine where you don't have the problem you should be able to tell what the FreeBSD box is doing differently, and maybe work out how to fix it. Be aware that the full debug output from sshd should not be published as it can contain privileged information. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFABGlndtESqEQa7a0RAqMEAKCEsR6YaoHhngbuiktyOWIOc1xPpgCeIKGr JfDKMs7NCIw96RgRtaFGwTk= =ucrF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ew6BAiZeqk4r7MaW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 14:02:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D5316A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:02:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A7743D2F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:02:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004011322021601400phmh0e>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:02:16 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id B75423A; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:02:13 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "David Meier" References: <64287.195.141.214.38.1073992712.squirrel@hiwatt.lognet.ch> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 13 Jan 2004 17:02:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <64287.195.141.214.38.1073992712.squirrel@hiwatt.lognet.ch> Message-ID: <44k73vld7e.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 51 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How "safe" is 5.2 to use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:02:25 -0000 "David Meier" writes: > I am relatively new to the world of FreeBSD. But first, congrats to the > new release! I am somewhat insecure on how trustfully I can use the new > release for my intended use (and I hope my questions haven't been posted a > zillion times before). Therefore I hope the FreeBSD nuts can advise me > whether to go for 4.9 or 5.2. Yes. Um, wait, maybe I'll have more-useful advice after more details. > The setup: > hardware: DELL PowerEdge 1750 (Dual XEON, 2GB RAM, RAID 1). > web server: Apache 2.0, MySQL 4.0, PHP 4.3.4, Perl 5.8 > mail server: Postfix, Cyrus IMAPd, Cyrus SASL, Amavis-new, SpamAssassin, > ClamAV Okay, it's pretty new and powerful hardware, and the software is all fairly widely used. Should be no big deal. > The servers will be used for virtual hosting as a small ISP evironment and > housed about 30min from where I work (in case I have to reset them...). That's convenient. > I don't know how and if the instability risks may affect such a setup of > services on the hardware described. Unfortunately, the advisories are kept > in pretty general language, however, I know it is hard to predict how it > will be running on a particular system. I just don't know FreeBSD well > enough to have a 'feel' about it (although I don't rely too much on > 'feelings' in the world of computers). Is upgrading to 5.2 comparable to, > say, I upgrade from RedHat 9 to RedHat's newest release? > > What I like about the 5.x releases is the possibility of taking file > system snapshots, for example to back up the mailboxes. Okay, so you actually would like features that are specific to 5.x. That's a good enough reason to try it; from a user point of view, 5.2 seems to be roughly comparable to 4.9 in dependability. If you can install and configure the system, 5.2 will probably work well for you. This implies that you can go through a fairly thorough system test on your actual hardware before you install the system(s) in their permanent location (or at least before you bring them into production use). If you have any trouble that worries you at all, drop back to 4.9 and install that. How's that? -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area: resume/CV at http://be-well.ilk.org:8088/~lowell/resume/ username/password "public" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 14:08:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C18416A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:08:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.buzzardnews.com (mail.buzzardnews.com [64.235.227.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A9F43D6B for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:07:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shawn@cpl.net) Received: from shawn ([216.117.217.220]) by mail.buzzardnews.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with SMTP id i0DM7wS47031 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:07:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <000901c3da21$b3c2a640$dcd975d8@shawn> From: "Shawn Ramsey" To: Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 13:38:35 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: compile problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:08:21 -0000 I am having trouble compiling perl (as well as others, such as GD). Here = is th error message : Making List::Util (dynamic) Making MIME::Base64 (dynamic) cc -c -DAPPLLIB_EXP=3D"/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.2/BSDPAN" = -DHAS_FPSETMASK -DHAS _FLOATINGPOINT_H -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include -O -pipe = -DVERSION =3D\"2.21\" -DXS_VERSION=3D\"2.21\" -DPIC -fPIC "-I../../.." Base64.c Base64.xs: In function `XS_MIME__Base64_decode_base64': Base64.xs:219: `dowarn' undeclared (first use in this function) Base64.xs:219: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once Base64.xs:219: for each function it appears in.) *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/work/perl-5.8.2/ext/MIME/Base64. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/work/perl-5.8.2. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8. This is on a 4.7-STABLE system from 2002... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 14:08:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D799216A54E for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:08:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAA243D6E for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:08:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin08-en2 [10.13.10.153]) by smtpout.mac.com (8.12.6/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id i0DM8jOJ028285; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:08:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.1.193] (nfw2.codefab.com [66.234.138.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin08/MantshX 3.0) with ESMTP id i0DM8iTR012024; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:08:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <000d01c3d980$5521b6e0$5858269e@JANELLE> References: <000d01c3d980$5521b6e0$5858269e@JANELLE> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <0D7DAA44-4615-11D8-AA98-003065ABFD92@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:08:44 -0500 To: Jefferson San Juan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.609) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: binary execute restrictions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:08:55 -0000 On Jan 12, 2004, at 9:52 PM, Jefferson San Juan wrote: > How do I restrict normal users from executing their own compiled > executable > binary files? Give them a "restricted shell" which limits the commands they can run to ones you specify. See "man zshall" for one example, although other restricted shells exist which might come closer to what you want than ZSH particularly: RESTRICTED SHELL When the basename of the command used to invoke zsh starts with the letter `r' or the `-r' command line option is supplied at invocation, the shell becomes restricted. Emulation mode is determined after stripping the letter `r' from the invocation name. The following are disabled in restricted mode: o changing directories with the cd builtin o changing or unsetting the PATH, path, MODULE_PATH, module_path, SHELL, HISTFILE, HISTSIZE, GID, EGID, UID, EUID, USERNAME, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, LD_AOUT_LIBRARY_PATH, LD_PRELOAD and LD_AOUT_PRELOAD parameters o specifying command names containing / o specifying command pathnames using hash o redirecting output to files o using the exec builtin command to replace the shell with another command o using jobs -Z to overwrite the shell process' argument and envi- ronment space o using the ARGV0 parameter to override argv[0] for external com- mands o turning off restricted mode with set +r or unsetopt RESTRICTED -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:01:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EAAD16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:01:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp21.singnet.com.sg (smtp21.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1670B43D2D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:01:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from spades@galaxynet.org) Received: from bryanuptrvb0jc (bb-203-125-29-205.singnet.com.sg [203.125.29.205])i0DN1L3T021551 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:01:22 +0800 Message-ID: <02cd01c3da29$2d5b0540$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> From: "Spades" To: References: <64287.195.141.214.38.1073992712.squirrel@hiwatt.lognet.ch> <44k73vld7e.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:01:27 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: recompile kernel problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Spades List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:01:26 -0000 Hi, I installed FreeBSD 4.9-PREREL and recompiled the kernel and got this problem during makeworld. Any idea? vnode_if.h:876: warning: inlining failed in call to `VOP_UNLOCK' /usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: warning: called from here /usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c: In function `union_inactive': /usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:1705: warning: unused variable `vpp' /usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c: In function `union_unlock': /usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:1803: warning: unused variable `un' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/union. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/compile/CONF. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:02:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF5916A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:02:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from sage.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3F443D1D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:02:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (root@tao [10.0.0.247]) by sage.thought.org (8.12.9/8.11.4) with ESMTP id i0DN2bGH028320; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:02:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by thought.org (8.12.6/8.11.3) id i0DN2ar6070483; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:02:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:02:35 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: "Michael A. Alestock" Message-ID: <20040113230235.GA70305@tao.thought.org> References: <20040113012652.O6773@bsd.maa-net.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040113012652.O6773@bsd.maa-net.net> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 17 years of service to the Unix community User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Errors in upgrading ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:02:41 -0000 On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 01:37:25AM -0500, Michael A. Alestock wrote: > I get numerous errors while trying to, "portsdb -Uu", 'portversion -l "<", > and "portupgrade -arR". I don't get any kind of prompt to change anything. > How would I go about fixing these errors so that I can upgrade my ports to the latest > version(s)?? Here's a snippet from the PORTUPGRADE I did, but it stopped > after coming up in error.... > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer. > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa > /tmp/portupgrade72647.10 make > ** Fix the problem and try again. > ---> Skipping 'x11/XFree86-4' (XFree86-4.3.0,1) because > 'x11-servers/XFree86-4-FontServer' (XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0) failed > ** The following packages were not installed or upgraded (*:skipped / > !:failed) > ! dns/noip (noip-1.6) (port directory error) > ! www/mod_php5 (mod_php5-5.0.0.a3_2,1) (configure error) I may be able to speak to the above 'configure' err. Some of my hosts are not running 4.7 or 4.8, but 4.[78]-PRERELEASE. In at least one port, the pre-processor checks for the version number; if < 4.7; if > 4.8... Until I move up to 4.9, each time I upgrade, I have do hack the src a wee bit. You might grep -r the mod_php5 src and see. gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:05:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69B1316A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:05:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA15143D46 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:05:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jadams01@sprynet.com) Received: from sprynet.com ([68.155.228.252]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040113230500.DETC1944.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net@sprynet.com> for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:05:00 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:06:46 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: John Adams To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <28FD4BE5-461D-11D8-97CC-000393C505EC@sprynet.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553) Subject: Fwd: New installation: Hanging when trying to dial out X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:05:03 -0000 On Tuesday, January 13, 2004, at 11:06 AM, Andrew Boothman wrote: > I presume you get sio lines for all of your serial ports? My original > point still stands, are you sure you're using the right one for where > your modem is plugged in? Yes, I'm pretty sure--I mistakenly used cuaa1 in my earliest attempts. > Have you read through > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/dialout.html > ? Yes, and the subsequent chapter on PPP, as well. Thanks again, John A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:06:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F36D316A4CF for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:06:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCFB043D41 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:06:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jadams01@sprynet.com) Received: from sprynet.com ([68.155.228.252]) by imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040113230536.DEYY1944.imf25aec.mail.bellsouth.net@sprynet.com> for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:05:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:07:22 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed From: John Adams To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <3E4C258E-461D-11D8-97CC-000393C505EC@sprynet.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553) Subject: New installation: Hanging when trying to dial out X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:06:10 -0000 I love detailed questions! On Tuesday, January 13, 2004, at 01:05 PM, fbsd_user wrote: > Why don't you start at the beginning and tell us about the PC you > installed 4.6 on? It's an eMachines etower 600is > Is this an pre Y2K box? Shouldn't be--I bought it new at Frye's in early 2001. > What operating system was on it before? The primary drive has Windows ME on it. 4.6 is on the secondary drive. > Have you ever used the floppy drive before? Yes. > Does the floppy ready light flash when you power up the PC and boot? Good question--I'll check that next time I do so. > What command are you using to try to mount the cd drive? mount /dev/cd* /mnt #No, I didn't use the *--but I tried all the /dev/cd* entries, one at a time, just as I did the /dev/fd* entries. > You know the drive works because you installed from it. Yes. > Have you checked the PC's bio's to verify that the com ports are > enabled and the floppy drive is enabled? No--I'll do that next time through, too. However, see below for why I'm pretty sure the com ports (at least) are enabled. > Is the modem powered up before you boot FBSD? Yes. > Have you used the modem before? Yes. > Can you prove it works on another system? It works on this one while running Windows ME--I tested that. > Does this command connect to your com port with the external modem? > Tip comx where x is the com port number that has modem > > If it connects enter AT for the hayes attention command. Should > reply with OK It replies "connected" and is now hung. I never got to enter AT. > Use ~ the . keyboard keys to exit tip command. The keyboard is now unresponsive, both to the ~ commands (~. and ~?) and to Alt-F3ing to another logon window. Power cycling... I did not see the floppy light--I had it disconnected while adding the secondary drive. I'll check that next time it's powered down. The floppy is enabled in BIOS. Serial port A is Auto, the floppy disk controlled is Enabled. I'm going to leave it in BIOS setup while I do some things with my daughter--back in a bit. Thanks! John A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:32:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A0E16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:32:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from freep.dyns.net (adsl-63-195-184-80.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.195.184.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A25B343D5F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:32:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from micheas@micheas.dyns.net) Received: (qmail 28419 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2004 23:32:31 -0000 Received: from tux.a (HELO tux) (mail@10.0.0.173) by sol.a with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 23:32:31 -0000 Received: from micheas by tux with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AgY1P-0000FA-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:32:31 -0800 From: Micheas Herman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <44k73vld7e.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <64287.195.141.214.38.1073992712.squirrel@hiwatt.lognet.ch> <44k73vld7e.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Free Print Shop Message-Id: <1074036751.631.35.camel@tux> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:32:31 -0800 Sender: Micheas Herman cc: David Meier Subject: Re: How "safe" is 5.2 to use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: micheas@freep.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:32:51 -0000 On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 14:02, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > "David Meier" writes: > > > I am relatively new to the world of FreeBSD. But first, congrats to the > > new release! I am somewhat insecure on how trustfully I can use the new > > release for my intended use (and I hope my questions haven't been posted a > > zillion times before). Therefore I hope the FreeBSD nuts can advise me > > whether to go for 4.9 or 5.2. > > Yes. Um, wait, maybe I'll have more-useful advice after more details. > > > The setup: > > hardware: DELL PowerEdge 1750 (Dual XEON, 2GB RAM, RAID 1). Double check your RAID controler. SMP may or may not be production ready. It was a problem at one point. under a certain condition. I don't have any SMP boxes so I haven't paid much attention. > > web server: Apache 2.0, MySQL 4.0, PHP 4.3.4, Perl 5.8 > > mail server: Postfix, Cyrus IMAPd, Cyrus SASL, Amavis-new, SpamAssassin, > > ClamAV Apache 2.0 will like FreeBSD 5.x better, AFAIK I don't think any of the other apps will care one way or the other. > > Okay, it's pretty new and powerful hardware, and the software is all > fairly widely used. Should be no big deal. > > > The servers will be used for virtual hosting as a small ISP evironment and > > housed about 30min from where I work (in case I have to reset them...). > > That's convenient. > > > I don't know how and if the instability risks may affect such a setup of > > services on the hardware described. Unfortunately, the advisories are kept > > in pretty general language, however, I know it is hard to predict how it > > will be running on a particular system. I just don't know FreeBSD well > > enough to have a 'feel' about it (although I don't rely too much on > > 'feelings' in the world of computers). Is upgrading to 5.2 comparable to, > > say, I upgrade from RedHat 9 to RedHat's newest release? > > > > What I like about the 5.x releases is the possibility of taking file > > system snapshots, for example to back up the mailboxes. > > Okay, so you actually would like features that are specific to 5.x. > That's a good enough reason to try it; from a user point of view, 5.2 > seems to be roughly comparable to 4.9 in dependability. If you can > install and configure the system, 5.2 will probably work well for > you. This implies that you can go through a fairly thorough system > test on your actual hardware before you install the system(s) in their > permanent location (or at least before you bring them into production > use). If you have any trouble that worries you at all, drop back to > 4.9 and install that. > > How's that? -- Micheas Herman email: micheas@freep.org Free Print Shop web: http://www.FreePrintShop.org phone: (415)648-3222 fax: (415)648-4466 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:38:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E7916A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:38:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from freep.dyns.net (adsl-63-195-184-80.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.195.184.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC1AF43D69 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:38:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from micheas@micheas.dyns.net) Received: (qmail 28472 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2004 23:38:36 -0000 Received: from tux.a (HELO tux) (mail@10.0.0.173) by sol.a with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 23:38:36 -0000 Received: from micheas by tux with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AgY7I-0000Fm-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:38:36 -0800 From: Micheas Herman To: Scott Mitchell In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Free Print Shop Message-Id: <1074037115.631.41.camel@tux> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:38:36 -0800 Sender: Micheas Herman cc: 'Vahric MUHTARYAN' cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Whan can I do if OS does not boot after makeworld X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: micheas@freep.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:38:42 -0000 On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 07:55, Scott Mitchell wrote: > owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org wrote: > > Did you ever have any problem about makeworld process ?! > > I afraid of one day will come and I can't boot my FreeBSD > > > > Vahric > > This is why the recommended update process is (in part): > > # make buildworld > # make buildkernel > # make installkernel > > Followed by a reboot into single-user mode before doing the installworld. This is the place that I have been bitten. In 5.x (I don't know about 4.x off the top of my head) you have to type "shutdown -r now" and NOT "shutdown now" The later keeps using your old kernel which is what you are trying not to do. It was an new system in a huge mess so I just reinstalled instead of trying to fix the problems. Micheas > If the new kernel doesn't boot, you've still got the previous one in > /kernel.old, so you can just boot from that one and carry on without having > trashed any part of your system. > > If installworld somehow manages to make your system unbootable, you have a > few options: > - boot single-user and try to fix things with the tools in /stand (or > /rescue on 5.x) > - boot CD #2 and try to fix things with the tools in the live filesystem > - restore from backups (you do have backups, right?) > > Personally, I've made plenty of unbootable kernels, and a few worlds that > behaved strangely in places, but never an unusable system (fingers crossed > :-) > > Scott > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Micheas Herman email: micheas@freep.org Free Print Shop web: http://www.FreePrintShop.org phone: (415)648-3222 fax: (415)648-4466 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 15:57:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1425216A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:57:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553BC43D3F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:57:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.103]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20040113235709.TNJP21134.mta11.adelphia.net@barbish>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:57:09 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "John Adams" , Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:57:09 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <3E4C258E-461D-11D8-97CC-000393C505EC@sprynet.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: RE: New installation: Hanging when trying to dial out X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:57:12 -0000 Try this command to mount the cd drive. First load the 4.6 install cd in cd drive mount /cdrom cd /cdrom ls cd / umount /cdrom look at the etc/fstab to see how cd drive is configured Explain how you switch from booting winme to booting FBSD Verify floppy drive works in winme. If you have box open you may have pulled the ribbon lose from the floppy drive. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of John Adams Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 6:07 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: New installation: Hanging when trying to dial out I love detailed questions! On Tuesday, January 13, 2004, at 01:05 PM, fbsd_user wrote: > Why don't you start at the beginning and tell us about the PC you > installed 4.6 on? It's an eMachines etower 600is > Is this an pre Y2K box? Shouldn't be--I bought it new at Frye's in early 2001. > What operating system was on it before? The primary drive has Windows ME on it. 4.6 is on the secondary drive. > Have you ever used the floppy drive before? Yes. > Does the floppy ready light flash when you power up the PC and boot? Good question--I'll check that next time I do so. > What command are you using to try to mount the cd drive? mount /dev/cd* /mnt #No, I didn't use the *--but I tried all the /dev/cd* entries, one at a time, just as I did the /dev/fd* entries. > You know the drive works because you installed from it. Yes. > Have you checked the PC's bio's to verify that the com ports are > enabled and the floppy drive is enabled? No--I'll do that next time through, too. However, see below for why I'm pretty sure the com ports (at least) are enabled. > Is the modem powered up before you boot FBSD? Yes. > Have you used the modem before? Yes. > Can you prove it works on another system? It works on this one while running Windows ME--I tested that. > Does this command connect to your com port with the external modem? > Tip comx where x is the com port number that has modem > > If it connects enter AT for the hayes attention command. Should > reply with OK It replies "connected" and is now hung. I never got to enter AT. > Use ~ the . keyboard keys to exit tip command. The keyboard is now unresponsive, both to the ~ commands (~. and ~?) and to Alt-F3ing to another logon window. Power cycling... I did not see the floppy light--I had it disconnected while adding the secondary drive. I'll check that next time it's powered down. The floppy is enabled in BIOS. Serial port A is Auto, the floppy disk controlled is Enabled. I'm going to leave it in BIOS setup while I do some things with my daughter--back in a bit. Thanks! John A _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 16:02:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5802316A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:02:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from 2p.hu (fehercapa.kektintahal.pirospolip.hu [195.70.35.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CBD43D4C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:02:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wigyori@2p.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 2p.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4E6973AB; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:07:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from 2p.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fehercapa [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25985-07; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:07:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from E40.boomer.net (adsl-2-132.tvnet.hu [195.38.115.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by 2p.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2159739D for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:07:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:59:50 +0000 (GMT) From: Zoltan HERPAI X-X-Sender: wigyori@E40.boomer.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040114005622.I71749@E40.boomer.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at megaweb.hu Subject: 5.2, SYSVSHM and IPFILTER X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:02:43 -0000 hi, i'm having problems compiling a new kernel. relevant parts of the config are: options SYSVSHM options SHMMAXPGS=524288 options SHMSEG=64 options SYSVSEM options SEMMNI=80 options SEMMNS=480 options SEMMNU=240 options SEMMAP=240 options SYSVMSG (this is for jailed PGSQL), options IPFILTER options IPFILTER_LOG options PFIL_HOOKS (this is to redirect to jail, etc. PFIL_HOOKS was added after some googleing). kernel compiled without problems with PGSQL tunings, without IPFILTER part. error message is: cc -c -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../../.. -I../../../contrib/dev/acpica -I../../../contrib/ipfilter -I../../../contrib/dev/ath -I../../../contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I../../../contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=15000 -fno-strict-aliasing -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -Werror ../../../kern/sysv_shm.c ../../../kern/sysv_shm.c:134: warning: integer overflow in expression *** Error code 1 anyone have a clue? -w- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 16:22:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8EE816A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:22:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.au.itouchnet.net (nat2.au.itouchnet.net [144.135.23.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA6A043D3F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:22:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrewjt@applecomm.net) Received: from nobody by mx1.au.itouchnet.net with scanned_ok (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1AgYpJ-00009W-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:24:05 +1100 Received: from [192.168.13.202] (helo=[192.168.13.202]) by mx1.au.itouchnet.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1AgYpJ-00009O-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:24:05 +1100 From: Andrew Thomson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1074039800.701.27.camel@itouch-1011.prv.au.itouchnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:23:21 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Checked: Scanned for any viruses and unauthorized attachments at mx1.au.itouchnet.net X-iScan-ID: 586-1074039845-76333@mx1.au.itouchnet.net version $Name: REL_2_0_2 $ Subject: cdrecord problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:22:45 -0000 Just trying to write a cd under 5.2 but am having some issues. Relevant output below. Thoughts? 1,0,0 100) 'LG ' 'CD-ROM CRD-8400B' '1.04' Removable CD-ROM 1,1,0 101) 'CREATIVE' 'CD-RW RW1210E ' 'LCS6' Removable CD-ROM # cdrecord -v -eject dev=1,1,0 5.2-RELEASE-i386-miniinst.iso Cdrecord 2.00.3 (i386-unknown-freebsd5.2) Copyright (C) 1995-2002 J\xf6rg Schill ing TOC Type: 1 = CD-ROM scsidev: '1,1,0' scsibus: 1 target: 1 lun: 0 Using libscg version 'schily-0.7' atapi: 0 Device type : Removable CD-ROM Version : 0 Response Format: 1 Vendor_info : 'CREATIVE' Identifikation : 'CD-RW RW1210E ' Revision : 'LCS6' Device seems to be: Generic mmc CD-RW. Using generic SCSI-3/mmc CD-R driver (mmc_cdr). Driver flags : MMC SWABAUDIO BURNFREE Supported modes: TAO PACKET SAO SAO/R96P SAO/R96R RAW/R96P RAW/R96R Drive buf size : 1658880 = 1620 KB FIFO size : 4194304 = 4096 KB Track 01: data 236 MB Total size: 271 MB (26:55.60) = 121170 sectors Lout start: 272 MB (26:57/45) = 121170 sectors Current Secsize: 2048 ATIP info from disk: Indicated writing power: 4 Is not unrestricted Is not erasable Disk sub type: Medium Type A, high Beta category (A+) (3) ATIP start of lead in: -11077 (97:34/23) ATIP start of lead out: 359848 (79:59/73) Disk type: Long strategy type (Cyanine, AZO or similar) Manuf. index: 11 Manufacturer: Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation Blocks total: 359848 Blocks current: 359848 Blocks remaining: 238678 Starting to write CD/DVD at speed 12 in real TAO mode for single session. Last chance to quit, starting real write 0 seconds. Operation starts. Waiting for reader process to fill input buffer ... input buffer ready. BURN-Free is OFF. Performing OPC... cdrecord: Input/output error. send opc: scsi sendcmd: retryable error CDB: 54 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 status: 0x2 (CHECK CONDITION) Sense Bytes: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Sense Key: 0xFFFFFFFF [], Segment 0 Sense Code: 0x00 Qual 0x00 (no additional sense information) Fru 0x0 Sense flags: Blk 0 (not valid) cmd finished after 0.000s timeout 60s cdrecord: OPC failed. Writing time: 4.456s cdrecord: fifo had 64 puts and 0 gets. cdrecord: fifo was 0 times empty and 0 times full, min fill was 100%. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 16:31:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28A7416A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:31:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D4943D49 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:31:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id i0E0YuGW026467; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:34:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.1.1.193] (nfw2.codefab.com [66.234.138.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin07/MantshX 3.0) with ESMTP id i0E0V4oo011879; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:31:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20040114005622.I71749@E40.boomer.net> References: <20040114005622.I71749@E40.boomer.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:31:04 -0500 To: Zoltan HERPAI X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.609) cc: FreeBSD-questions ORG Subject: Re: 5.2, SYSVSHM and IPFILTER X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:31:09 -0000 On Jan 13, 2004, at 7:59 PM, Zoltan HERPAI wrote: > i'm having problems compiling a new kernel. relevant parts of the > config > are: > options SYSVSHM > options SHMMAXPGS=524288 This quantity is measured in 4K virtual memory pages; make it smaller and try again. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 17:49:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A9216A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:49:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net (imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net [205.152.59.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B313143D64 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:49:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jadams01@sprynet.com) Received: from sprynet.com ([68.155.228.252]) by imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.netESMTP <20040114014856.OYUJ18522.imf20aec.mail.bellsouth.net@sprynet.com>; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:48:56 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:50:40 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v553) To: From: John Adams In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <0EA66CC4-4634-11D8-97CC-000393C505EC@sprynet.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.553) cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New installation: Hanging when trying to dial out X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:49:08 -0000 On Tuesday, January 13, 2004, at 06:57 PM, fbsd_user wrote: > Try this command to mount the cd drive. > First load the 4.6 install cd in cd drive > mount /cdrom > cd /cdrom > ls > cd / > umount /cdrom Success! > look at the etc/fstab to see how cd drive is configured Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass /dev/acd0c /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 > Explain how you switch from booting winme to booting FBSD I've yet to learn how to tell the bootloader to boot from the primary drive, so I just change the order of the drives in BIOS. > Verify floppy drive works in winme. And there's the answer--I believe this drive is dead. I recall it making noises some time ago, and it must've gone over the edge. Fortunately, Atlanta has some good stores--I've been wanting to pop down to the one by Tech for a while now, and this is as good an excuse as any. This brings me back to the modem question. I can type in the entries from ppp.conf and ppp.log--or I suppose I could try to learn to write to the FAT partition elsewhere on this drive, which I'm not unwilling to do (shouldn't be hard, which is what I thought about the modem.) Advice? And thanks again, John A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 17:53:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9926C16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:53:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E99B43D49 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 17:53:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.103]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20040114015345.XPVC21134.mta11.adelphia.net@barbish> for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:53:45 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:53:44 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: -HUP 1 command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:53:46 -0000 After making changes to syslog.conf and newsyslog.conf what is the command to enable the changes. Is it Kill -HUP 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 18:04:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005A216A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:04:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E892943D41 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:04:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.no-ip.com ([66.30.200.37]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20040114020404012006jiese>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:04:04 +0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 39DF93A; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:04:04 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <000d01c3d980$5521b6e0$5858269e@JANELLE> <0D7DAA44-4615-11D8-AA98-003065ABFD92@mac.com> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 13 Jan 2004 21:04:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <0D7DAA44-4615-11D8-AA98-003065ABFD92@mac.com> Message-ID: <444quzs2uj.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: binary execute restrictions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:04:06 -0000 Charles Swiger writes: > On Jan 12, 2004, at 9:52 PM, Jefferson San Juan wrote: > > How do I restrict normal users from executing their own compiled > > executable > > binary files? > > Give them a "restricted shell" which limits the commands they can run > to ones you specify. See "man zshall" for one example, although other > restricted shells exist which might come closer to what you want than > ZSH particularly: I suspect that a restricted shell isn't going to be appropriate in this case. Restricted shells are useful for avoiding shooting yourself in the foot, but they're really not intended to be secure. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 18:22:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B0716A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:22:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D023A43D3F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:22:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 363D913620; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:22:20 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:22:20 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: fbsd_user Message-ID: <20040114022220.GA86475@grimoire.chen.org.nz> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: -HUP 1 command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:22:22 -0000 On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 08:53:44PM -0500, fbsd_user wrote: > After making changes to syslog.conf and newsyslog.conf > what is the command to enable the changes. > > Is it Kill -HUP 1 No. You don't need to HUP anything for newsyslog.conf, it's a cron-job. For changes to syslog.conf you need to HUP the syslogd process, ie: # kill -HUP -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "Only the meek get pinched. The bold survive." - Ferris Bueller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 18:24:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4982A16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:24:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from delicious.cs.wisc.edu (delicious.cs.wisc.edu [128.105.167.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E048043D3F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:24:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ncb@cs.wisc.edu) Received: from localhost (ncb@localhost) by delicious.cs.wisc.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA00548 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:24:53 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:24:53 -0600 (CST) From: "Nathan C. Burnett" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: atk portupgrade errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:24:55 -0000 I'm running 5.1-RELEASE. For several weeks, when doing a portupgrade, atk won't upgrade. When I run portupgrade -a, I get the following at the end of the run: [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 200 packages found (-0 +1) . done] ---> Skipping 'x11-toolkits/gtk20' (gtk-2.2.4_1) because 'devel/atk' (atk-1.4.1) failed ---> Skipping 'devel/libglade2' (libglade2-2.0.1_1) because 'x11-toolkits/gtk20' (gtk-2.2.4_1) failed ---> Skipping 'editors/AbiWord2' (AbiWord2-2.0.1) because 'devel/libglade2' (libglade2-2.0.1_1) failed ---> Skipping 'www/plugger' (plugger-4.0_3) because 'editors/AbiWord2' (AbiWord2-2.0.1) failed ---> Skipping 'textproc/gtkspell2' (gtkspell2-2.0.4) because 'x11-toolkits/gtk20' (gtk-2.2.4_1) failed ---> Skipping 'net/gaim' (gaim-0.71_4) because 'textproc/gtkspell2' (gtkspell2-2.0.4) failed ** The following packages were not installed or upgraded (*:skipped / !:failed) ! devel/atk (atk-1.4.1) (checksum mismatch) * x11-toolkits/gtk20 (gtk-2.2.4_1) * devel/libglade2 (libglade2-2.0.1_1) * editors/AbiWord2 (AbiWord2-2.0.1) * www/plugger (plugger-4.0_3) * textproc/gtkspell2 (gtkspell2-2.0.4) * net/gaim (gaim-0.71_4) Scrolling back and looking at the attempted upgrade of atk shows: >> Checksum mismatch for gnome2/atk-1.4.1.tar.bz2. ===> Refetch for 1 more times files: gnome2/atk-1.4.1.tar.bz2 >> atk-1.4.1.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/gnome2. >> Attempting to fetch from http://www.gtlib.cc.gatech.edu/pub/gnome/sources/atk/1.4/. fetch: atk-1.4.1.tar.bz2: local modification time does not match remote It goes on to try many different mirror sites, each one resulting in this modification time error. This has been the case for several weeks so I assume it's a problem with my installation and not with the port itself. Presumably if everyone was having this problem someone would have fixed it. Any ideas as to where I should start looking to fix this? It's annoying since there are about a half a dozen other ports that won't upgrade due to a dependency to atk. Thanks in advance, -N From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 18:39:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED3316A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:39:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A5D43D4C for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 18:39:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.103]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20040114023944.ZIBL21134.mta11.adelphia.net@barbish> for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:39:44 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:39:43 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: IPFW 'keep state' & 'limit' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:39:46 -0000 Reading the man page on IPFW rule syntax, I get the impression that the 'limit' option uses the stateful dynamic rules table. But it's unclear whether 'keep state' and limit can be used on the same rule, or if the limit option performs the 'keep state' function in addition to the limit function. So as an example $cmd 00390 allow tcp from any to any 22 in via dc0 setup keep-state limit src-addr 3 will this work? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 20:08:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A761A16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:08:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtpout-1-1c.secureserver.net (smtpout-1-1c.secureserver.net [64.202.166.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6DD1943D1D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:08:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from r_ikeda@i-international.org) Received: (qmail 18801 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2004 04:09:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO webmail-2-1.secureserver.net) (64.202.166.114) by smtpout-1-1c.secureserver.net with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 04:09:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 6952 invoked by uid 99); 14 Jan 2004 04:08:32 -0000 Message-ID: <20040114040832.6951.qmail@webmail-2-1.secureserver.net> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:08:32 -0700 From: "Rommel B. Ikeda" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Subject: NOQUEUE: SYSERR (root): host "localhost" unknown ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:08:47 -0000 Hi, I do not know if the "Subject Name" was the right one for it...because I really do not know what is going on... I have been seeing this message... 554.5.3.0 host "localhost" unknown: Invalid Argument Jan.... IBM-R40e sm-mta [417] NOQUEUE:SYSERR (root)"localhost" unknown: Invalid Argument during my boot-up process...but because I did not find anything wrong when I use my system...I just let it be...Not untill I encountered having a problem in my local package initialization...I am trying to use cannaserver for my Japanese input. This is my system says about my cannaserver during boot-up process: local package initialization: cannaserver in malloc(): error allocation failed Jan... IBM-R40e kernel: pid 454 (cannaserver), uid: exited on signal 6 Abort trap I thought that this 2 are connected and I do not know what to do with it... So, what is really going on in my system? What is the problem? Can anyone give me advice, or help insolving this problem... Thanks in advance Rommel Ikeda From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 20:10:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E171916A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:10:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9040C43D45 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:10:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kevin_lee@att.net) Received: from kevin-7zvaax8t6 (120.kansas-03rh16rt-04rh15rt.mo.dial-access.att.net[12.73.206.120]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with SMTP id <2004011404105611200plko0e>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:10:57 +0000 Message-ID: <200401132210530434.191B83B7@mailhost.worldnet.att.net> X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.30.00.00 (4) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:10:53 -0600 From: "Kevin R. Lee" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:11:00 -0000 Hello, I was wondering what BSD stands for? Also what does AMD and Ultra= SPARC stand for? Any information would be very helpful. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 20:13:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5086716A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:13:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EDFF43D1D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:13:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kevin_lee@att.net) Received: from kevin-7zvaax8t6 (120.kansas-03rh16rt-04rh15rt.mo.dial-access.att.net[12.73.206.120]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with SMTP id <2004011404132411200pph0be>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:13:24 +0000 Message-ID: <200401132213200785.191DC34F@mailhost.worldnet.att.net> X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.30.00.00 (4) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:13:20 -0600 From: "Kevin R. Lee" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: Info. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:13:26 -0000 Sorry, one more question, what does DEC Alpha stand for? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 20:15:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C0816A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:15:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6736B43D3F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:15:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0E4Eval059290; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:14:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:14:57 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200401140414.i0E4Eval059290@fw.farid-hajji.net> From: "Cordula's Web" To: hnpatel@autostyle.co.za In-reply-to: <1074015147.191.2.camel@fbtab.h3p.co.za> (message from Hiren on Tue, 13 Jan 2004 19:32:27 +0200) X-Mailer: Emacs-21.3.1/FreeBSD-4.9-STABLE References: <1074015147.191.2.camel@fbtab.h3p.co.za> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: learning source X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: cpghost@cordula.ws List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:15:52 -0000 > i have studied C++ and am currently going through C. > i have been programming small programs in a windows environment. > i want to start understanding source and help program for bsd and open > source. > where can i start, im totally new and i want to know how things work. > i need advice "Advanced Programming in the Unix Environment" by W. Richard Stevens (Addison-Wesley) may be very useful, if you know enough C and would like to interface to any Unix-like operating system (including FreeBSD). You may be able to google up a good "C tutorial" which uses Unix as the underlying OS. Welcome on board and happy hacking! :) -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 20:23:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03EB216A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:23:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18C2943D5A for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:23:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kevin_lee@att.net) Received: from kevin-7zvaax8t6 (120.kansas-03rh16rt-04rh15rt.mo.dial-access.att.net[12.73.206.120]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with SMTP id <2004011404234711200pl0kee>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:23:47 +0000 Message-ID: <200401132223440182.19274674@mailhost.worldnet.att.net> X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.30.00.00 (4) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:23:44 -0600 From: "Kevin R. Lee" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: one more X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:23:50 -0000 This is the last one! What does IA-64 and AMD64 stand for? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 20:23:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F66116A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:23:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (fw.farid-hajji.net [213.146.115.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF0143D55 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:23:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from fw.farid-hajji.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fw.farid-hajji.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0E4N6al060696; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:23:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:23:06 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <200401140423.i0E4N6al060696@fw.farid-hajji.net> From: "Cordula's Web" To: kevin_lee@att.net In-reply-to: <200401132210530434.191B83B7@mailhost.worldnet.att.net> (kevin_lee@att.net) X-Mailer: Emacs-21.3.1/FreeBSD-4.9-STABLE References: <200401132210530434.191B83B7@mailhost.worldnet.att.net> cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: cpghost@cordula.ws List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:23:53 -0000 > Hello, I was wondering what BSD stands for? Also what does AMD and > Ultra SPARC stand for? Any information would be very helpful. BSD = Berkeley Software Distribution http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/B/BSD.html AMD = Advanced Micro Devices A company that produces (among others) Intel clones. SPARC = Scalable Processor ARChitecture A processor type developed by Sun. Google is your friend... -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 20:27:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B40C16A4CF for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:27:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from freep.dyns.net (adsl-63-195-184-80.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.195.184.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D13D643D48 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:27:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from micheas@micheas.dyns.net) Received: (qmail 30169 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2004 04:27:22 -0000 Received: from tux.a (HELO tux) (mail@10.0.0.173) by sol.a with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 04:27:22 -0000 Received: from micheas by tux with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1Agcck-0001zG-00; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:27:22 -0800 From: Micheas Herman To: "Kevin R. Lee" In-Reply-To: <200401132213200785.191DC34F@mailhost.worldnet.att.net> References: <200401132213200785.191DC34F@mailhost.worldnet.att.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Free Print Shop Message-Id: <1074054442.631.79.camel@tux> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:27:22 -0800 Sender: Micheas Herman cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Info. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: micheas@freep.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:27:24 -0000 On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 20:13, Kevin R. Lee wrote: > Sorry, one more question, what does DEC Alpha stand for? Digital Electric Corporation. (or did before Compaq bought them, before being bought themselves, by HP) Micheas > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Micheas Herman email: micheas@freep.org Free Print Shop web: http://www.FreePrintShop.org phone: (415)648-3222 fax: (415)648-4466 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 20:36:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C222216A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:36:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC9B43D39 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:36:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by rutger.owt.com (8.11.6p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id i0E4aci03452; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:36:39 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: "Kevin R. Lee" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:36:37 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200401132223440182.19274674@mailhost.worldnet.att.net> In-Reply-To: <200401132223440182.19274674@mailhost.worldnet.att.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401132036.37712.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: one more X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:36:43 -0000 On Tuesday 13 January 2004 08:23 pm, Kevin R. Lee wrote: > This is the last one! What does IA-64 and AMD64 stand for? > The 64-bit cpus for Intel and AMD. Kent -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 22:39:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209CD16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:39:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns2.alphaque.com (ns2.alphaque.com [202.75.47.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31A0343D39 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:39:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: (qmail 32471 invoked by uid 0); 14 Jan 2004 06:39:09 -0000 Received: from lucifer.net-gw.com (HELO prophet.alphaque.com) (202.75.47.153) by lucifer.net-gw.com with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 06:39:09 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.alphaque.com [127.0.0.1]) by prophet.alphaque.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0E6Ysac095280; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:34:54 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:34:53 +0800 (MYT) From: Dinesh Nair To: Nathan Kinkade In-Reply-To: <20040113161306.GM5411@npkfbsd> Message-ID: <20040114143344.N95135-100000@prophet.alphaque.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Gautam Gopalakrishnan cc: Alex Zivenko cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xmms - problem - how to fix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:39:15 -0000 On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Nathan Kinkade wrote: > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 07:09:21AM +1100, Gautam Gopalakrishnan wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 02:24:30PM +0200, Alex Zivenko wrote: > > > Hi! > > > I have some problem with my xmms mm player. When I'm treing to > > > listen some mp3's it gives me aN error, that I don't know how to > > > fix. I have KDE 3.1 if you need this info ^) So here it is: > > > bash-2.05b$ xmms > > > /dev/dsp: Device busy > > > /dev/dsp: Device busy > > > /* with OSS driver */ what does 'cat /dev/sndstat' say ? if you have a number of virtual sound channels, you can use /dev/dsp0.0 for artsd (kde), /dev/dsp0.1 for xmms and the like, until the max number of channels. Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 22:40:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAAD16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:40:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.infinitebubble.com (pia140-68.pioneernet.net [66.114.140.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE51E43D69 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:40:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jason-sender-c4c476@infinitebubble.com) Received: from mail.infinitebubble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0E5VV4u041414 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:31:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jason-sender-c4c476@infinitebubble.com) Received: from infinitebubble.com (mail2.bastyr.edu [204.203.216.252]) by mail.infinitebubble.com (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:31:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4004E43C.80505@infinitebubble.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:39:56 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jason Taylor X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.85 (Tomy Lee) Subject: Compaq Proliant 1500 / SMP - Success X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jason Taylor List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:40:22 -0000 The info on hw.physmem in this thread mostly did the trick for me: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&threadm=ee83fe30.0311120931.5a7f871e%40posting.google.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3Dutf-8%26q%3Dinstall%2Bhangs%2Bat%2B%252Fstand%252Fsysinstall%2Brunning%2Bas%2Binit%2Bon%2Bvty0%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch%26meta%3Dgroup%253Dalt.sys.pc-clone.compaq.servers Setting hw.physmem was the first part of the puzzle. However, as was one of the thread participants, I was getting a fatal trap 12 when I enabled APIC. Just so I could tell myself I'd tried everything, I changed the APIC mode from "Full Table Mapped" (I had had 4.7 installed and running properly set that way) to "Full Table". To my surprise, it worked beautifully! System: Compaq Proliant 1500 (E12) Dual P-133 SMART Array Controller firmware revision 2.26 5 4.3GB SCSI drives From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 22:40:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C9C16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:40:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.bastyr.edu (mail2.bastyr.edu [204.203.216.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0A743D46 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:40:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jtaylor@bastyr.edu) Received: from bastyr.edu ([172.16.1.131]) by mail2.bastyr.edu with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:40:22 -0800 Message-ID: <4004E455.7070208@bastyr.edu> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:40:21 -0800 From: Jason Taylor Organization: Bastyr University User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jan 2004 06:40:22.0297 (UTC) FILETIME=[48B86090:01C3DA69] Subject: Compaq Proliant 1500 / SMP - Success X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:40:27 -0000 The info on hw.physmem in this thread mostly did the trick for me: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=utf-8&threadm=ee83fe30.0311120931.5a7f871e%40posting.google.com&rnum=1&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26oe%3Dutf-8%26q%3Dinstall%2Bhangs%2Bat%2B%252Fstand%252Fsysinstall%2Brunning%2Bas%2Binit%2Bon%2Bvty0%26btnG%3DGoogle%2BSearch%26meta%3Dgroup%253Dalt.sys.pc-clone.compaq.servers Setting hw.physmem was the first part of the puzzle. However, as was one of the thread participants, I was getting a fatal trap 12 when I enabled APIC. Just so I could tell myself I'd tried everything, I changed the APIC mode from "Full Table Mapped" (I had had 4.7 installed and running properly set that way) to "Full Table". To my surprise, it worked beautifully! System: Compaq Proliant 1500 (E12) Dual P-133 SMART Array Controller firmware revision 2.26 5 4.3GB SCSI drives From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 22:59:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C1616A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:59:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.unixmexico.net (ns1.unixmexico.net [69.10.138.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C5C43D39 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 22:59:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nbari@unixmexico.com) Received: (qmail 41547 invoked by uid 85); 14 Jan 2004 07:04:07 -0000 Received: from nbari@unixmexico.com by ns1.unixmexico.net by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (hbedv: 6.22.0.1/6.22.0.6. Clear:. Processed in 0.2711 secs); 14 Jan 2004 07:04:07 -0000 Received: from ns1.unixmexico.net (HELO mail.unixmexico.com) ([69.10.138.161]) (envelope-sender ) by ns1.unixmexico.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 Jan 2004 07:04:07 -0000 Received: from 148.243.211.1 (SquirrelMail authenticated user nbari@unixmexico.com) by mail.unixmexico.com with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:07 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <54807.148.243.211.1.1074063847.squirrel@mail.unixmexico.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:04:07 -0600 (CST) From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicol=E1s_de_Bari_Embr=EDz_G._R.?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: Routing Networks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:59:51 -0000 Hi all, I need some help routing or making Nat on a LAN. I have something like this: I N T E R N E T ----------------- ^ ^ | | fxp0 public IP public IP | | FreeBSD server LINUX server | | dc0 192.168.10.1 | dc1 192.168.1.1 ^ 192.168.1.3 ^ | ^ | | | | | | ---------------- | Switch/Hub | ---------------- | | ------------------ ----------------- | LAN A | | LAN B | | 192.168.10.2-254 | | 192.168.1.4-100 | ------------------ ----------------- I have running a FreeBSD server as a gateway and DHCP, the server share the Internet to all the computers on LAN A (192.168.10.0/24). The server have 3 network cards: fxp0 is public IP. dc0 is the gateway for the LAN A "192.168.10.1". dc1 has IP 192.168.1.1 ( need help with this ). Right now i am just using fxp0 and dc0 so any computer on the LAN A "192.168.10.2-254" can have Internet, my ipnat.rules file looks like this: -- map fxp0 192.168.10.1/24 -> 0/32 portmap tcp/udp auto map fxp0 192.168.10.1/24 -> 0/32 -- until that point everything just work OK. There is another network, I will call it LAN B, this LAN make the same thing that i am doing with the FreeBSD Server, but instead it uses LINUX, the m achine have 2 network cars. eth0 has a public IP. eth1 is the gateway for the LAN B "192.168.1.3" Both networks are connected to the same switch/hub, but now i need that the computers of LAN A can see "ping" computers on LAN B. If I configure the third nick "dc1" on the FreeBSD server to have an IP on the range of LAN B for example with ip 192.168.1.1, then I can see all the computers from both LAN's, I can ping, telnet, ssh etc. to both 192.168.10.X and 192.168.1.X. networks "standing on the FreeBSD server." What i want to do is that a computer on LAN A with an IP on the range of 192.168.10.2-254 can ping, telnet, ssh, etc. to a computer on LAN B "192.168.1.X". How can i solve this problem, is this is a route or Nat problem ? There is one more issue, I can't touch the LINUX SERVER I can just be a client or join the LAN by configure a nic with a IP on the range of 192.168.1.0/24. I have been trying to fix this with static routes but i am not having luck. Any help will be apreciated. regards. -- nbari@unixmexico.com key ID 1EF56FDC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 23:00:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3243016A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:00:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp3.ispsnet.net (smtp3.ispsnet.net [64.63.240.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4984E43D1F for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:00:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from service@fixer.com) Received: from fixer2000 (unverified [67.31.181.110]) by smtp3.ispsnet.net (Joe 1) with ESMTP id 3805338 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:53:05 -0500 Message-ID: <01c501c3da6c$1b466ff0$69b51f43@fixer2000> From: To: Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:00:24 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: modem problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:00:45 -0000 uname -a FreeBSD fixer3.fixer.com 5.1-Release : FreeBSD 5.1 - Release #0: Tue Jan = 13 16:49:20 GMT 2004 root@/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/VILLATV i386 Modem problem. I have a P3-500 computer and a USR Robotics Hayes U5686 modem. The modem = works perfect on Win 98, Win XP and Redhat9, but on FreeBSD its works a = little strange. I have FreeBSD 4.7, 4.8 and 5.1. I plug the moden into a = sio port, I type ppp and term, then AT, OK comes back and I type = ATD3039514014, the modem dials and connects (I enter user name and = passwork), the small ppp's grow to large PPPs and I am connected. Even = though I am connected, no data flows(ever). Thats the problem. Theres no = link between the modem and the computer. I thought of using ifconfig to = add a route. After thinking for a while, I couldn't figure out 'how to'. I tried using 'tip cuaa0'. It did work, but only once(I don't know why). = I do have /etc/remote configured to work with tip. Info I have says it's = partially compatible for hayes. I tried it both ways, with "at=3Dhayes" = and without it. The results are the same. I made sure the file LCK under lock existed and just to be sure, I = chmod-ed 777 LCK and lock, to be sure it was authorized. Without the = lock file, it came back saying /var/spool/lock/LCK__file does not exist, = then crashed. On FreeBSD 4.8, it says:=20 %tip cuaa0 uu_lock: creat error: Permision denied all ports busy On FreeBSD 5.1, it says: %tip cuaa0 /dev/cuaa0: Permision Denied link down I have been fighting this problem for 2 weeks. I re-install FreeBSD = several times (yes, I rebuilt the kernel each time). For any help, thanks in advance Bruce bruce@fixer.com=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 23:12:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA1E16A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:12:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.lphp.org (APastourelles-107-1-12-56.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.80.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D304E43D31 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:12:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) Received: from sta01 (sta01.lphp.local [192.168.0.3]) by mail.lphp.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0E6eloK003128 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:40:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) From: Antoine Jacoutot To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:10:26 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401140810.26179.ajacoutot@lphp.org> Subject: can't re-use a leaf (if_tun_debug) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:12:32 -0000 Hi :) I just upgraded from 5.1-CURRENT to 5.2-RELEASE today, but I still have the same problem I was having before. When booting the box, I get the following error: module_register: module if_tun already exists! Module if_tun failed to register: 17 can't re-use a leaf (if_tun_debug)! It looks like FreeBSD wants to load the if_tun module but I already have "device tun" in my kernel config file. I deleted /etc/rc.d/* then did a "mergemaster -i" but it did not change anything. Do you have any idea how I could fix this ? Thanks in advance. Regards, Antoine From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 00:18:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5911E16A4CF for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:18:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A3143D49 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:18:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost [IPv6:::1]) i0E8IIfn074943 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:18:18 GMT (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i0E8IHAn074942; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:18:17 GMT (envelope-from matthew) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:18:17 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman To: "Rommel B. Ikeda" Message-ID: <20040114081817.GA74603@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , "Rommel B. Ikeda" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040114040832.6951.qmail@webmail-2-1.secureserver.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040114040832.6951.qmail@webmail-2-1.secureserver.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.61 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.61 (1.212.2.1-2003-12-09-exp) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NOQUEUE: SYSERR (root): host "localhost" unknown ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:18:26 -0000 --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 09:08:32PM -0700, Rommel B. Ikeda wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I do not know if the "Subject Name" was the right one for it...because I = really do not know what is going on... >=20 > I have been seeing this message... >=20 > 554.5.3.0 host "localhost" unknown: Invalid Argument > Jan.... IBM-R40e sm-mta [417] NOQUEUE:SYSERR (root)"localhost" unkno= wn: Invalid Argument Sendmail is trying to convert the hostname 'localhost' into an IP number. Not being able to do that is not good. You should have at least an entry for localhost in your /etc/hosts: 127.0.0.1 localhost You might also have the IPv6 equivalent: ::1 localhost and having the same information available from the DNS is quite handy: % host localhost. localhost has address 127.0.0.1 localhost has address ::1 localhost mail is handled (pri=3D5) by localhost Note: you will also tend to have entries for 'localhost.your.domain.com' -- these are fine, but not as important as the straight 'localhost' entries. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFABPtJdtESqEQa7a0RAkZtAKCMPqk+NgScs4yBE02ohvP1cWJkWgCfcXkk 4akKTxBu7COAhXEoIzqljyA= =SSSe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 00:58:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F1E16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:58:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub.ihlas.net.tr (mailhub.ihlas.net.tr [213.238.128.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44F9443D54 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:58:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmalik@ihlas.net.tr) Received: (qmail 88758 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2004 08:58:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maslak) (213.238.150.220) by mailhub.ihlas.net.tr with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 08:58:37 -0000 Message-ID: <002301c3da7c$6fd38980$dc96eed5@maslak> From: =?iso-8859-9?Q?Malik_B=FClent?= To: Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:57:27 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: rarp support on bsd ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:58:44 -0000 hello=20 i use freebsd5.1. i want to find out the computers whose ip addresses with their mac = addresses. that is i run rarp on bsd. How can i run rarp on Freebsd5.1 ? thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 01:57:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6990316A4FB for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:57:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.watchdog.net.nz (beta39.watchdog.net.nz [203.97.42.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8615043D5F for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 01:57:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from enerider@yahoo.co.nz) Received: from yahoo.co.nz (ip-219-88-245-234.watchdog.net.nz [219.88.245.234]) by smtp.watchdog.net.nz (8.11.6/8.11.2) with ESMTP id i0E9v2B03454; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:57:05 +1300 Message-ID: <4005128A.50003@yahoo.co.nz> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 22:57:30 +1300 From: Elijah Plunkett User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030524 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: service@fixer.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <01c501c3da6c$1b466ff0$69b51f43@fixer2000> In-Reply-To: <01c501c3da6c$1b466ff0$69b51f43@fixer2000> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: modem problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:57:24 -0000 Hi Bruce! try typing in "add default HISADDR" at the "PPP>" prompt (as in once it is authenticated and connected). I couldn't get stuff to work until i typed this in, then data flowed sweetly. HTH Elijah. :) service@fixer.com wrote: >uname -a > >FreeBSD fixer3.fixer.com 5.1-Release : FreeBSD 5.1 - Release #0: Tue Jan 13 16:49:20 > >GMT 2004 root@/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/VILLATV i386 > >Modem problem. > >I have a P3-500 computer and a USR Robotics Hayes U5686 modem. The modem works perfect on Win 98, Win XP and Redhat9, but on FreeBSD its works a little strange. I have FreeBSD 4.7, 4.8 and 5.1. I plug the moden into a sio port, I type ppp and term, then AT, OK comes back and I type ATD3039514014, the modem dials and connects (I enter user name and passwork), the small ppp's grow to large PPPs and I am connected. Even though I am connected, no data flows(ever). Thats the problem. Theres no link between the modem and the computer. I thought of using ifconfig to add a route. After thinking for a while, I couldn't figure out 'how to'. > >I tried using 'tip cuaa0'. It did work, but only once(I don't know why). I do have /etc/remote configured to work with tip. Info I have says it's partially compatible for hayes. I tried it both ways, with "at=hayes" and without it. The results are the same. > >I made sure the file LCK under lock existed and just to be sure, I chmod-ed 777 LCK and lock, to be sure it was authorized. Without the lock file, it came back saying /var/spool/lock/LCK__file does not exist, then crashed. > >On FreeBSD 4.8, it says: > >%tip cuaa0 > >uu_lock: creat error: Permision denied > >all ports busy > >On FreeBSD 5.1, it says: > >%tip cuaa0 > >/dev/cuaa0: Permision Denied > >link down > >I have been fighting this problem for 2 weeks. I re-install FreeBSD several times (yes, I rebuilt the kernel each time). > >For any help, thanks in advance > >Bruce > >bruce@fixer.com > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 02:11:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A842316A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:11:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.lphp.org (APastourelles-107-1-12-56.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.80.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E0843D49 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:11:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) Received: from admin.dioranews.local (modem209.metz.imaginet.fr [195.68.12.209] (may be forged)) by mail.lphp.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0EAB0oK004315 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:11:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) From: Antoine Jacoutot To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:11:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401141110.58734.ajacoutot@lphp.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ntpd does not work under 5.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:11:06 -0000 Hi :) I'm trying to configure ntpd under 5.2-RELEASE, but I think there might be a bug or something. My configuration used to work under 4.x but now I get errors. First: $ /etc/rc.d/ntpd start ps: kvm_getprocs: No such process Starting ntpd. --> I have no idea what it means Second (after a few days): $ cat /var/db/ntp.drift 0.000 --> it obviously does not sync; with ntpdate, it works though Besides, my box looses something like 30 minutes per day !!! Here is my /etc/ntp.conf: server ntp.univ-lyon1.fr prefer server clepsydra.dec.com server ntp0.nl.net driftfile /var/db/ntp.drift restrict default ignore restrict 127.0.0.1 restrict 192.168.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0 notrust nomodify notrap ntpd process: /usr/sbin/ntpd -p /var/run/ntpd.pid -f /var/db/ntpd.drift If you have any ideas... Thanks. Regards, Antoine From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 02:47:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4272A16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:47:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from daemon.kr.FreeBSD.org (daemon.kr.freebsd.org [61.78.53.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC2B43D49 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:47:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cjh@kr.FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (gradius [211.44.63.164]) by daemon.kr.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA581A74B for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:46:16 +0900 (KST) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:46:20 +0900 (KST) Message-Id: <20040114.194620.39192269.cjh@kr.FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: CHOI Junho Organization: Korea FreeBSD Users Group X-URL: http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.62 on Emacs 21.3.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: if_bfe for 4.8 (broadcam bcm4401) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:47:49 -0000 Hi, I've tried BCM4401 driver back-ported (not MFC'ed) for 4.9 from: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/56726 I can build, install, load. And devices probed. But it segfaults in any network action(notably dhclient, ifconfig). Anybody use this driver or bug reported? My platform is ftp-installed 4.9R. Here is part of dmesg: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE #0: Mon Oct 27 17:51:09 GMT 2003 root@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC ... bfe0: mem 0xfb800000-0xfb801fff irq 10 at device 5.0 on pci2 bfe0: Ethernet address: 00:0c:6e:35:0f:b2 miibus0: on bfe0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 02:49:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A6D16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:49:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.wep.tudelft.nl (mx2.wep.tudelft.nl [130.161.83.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B896E43D45 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:49:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rogier@virgiel.nl) Received: (qmail 19663 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2004 10:49:55 -0000 Received: from valhalla.iverdahl.local (HELO valhalla) (192.168.100.24) by mail.iverdahl.local with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 10:49:55 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20040114114949.01199658@virgiel.xs4all.nl> Organisation: Iverdahl.net X-Security: 512bit CAST Cypher (SSH reroute) X-Mailer: Rapier v2.5 (BSD/OS v4.2) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:49:49 +0100 To: FreeBSD-questions list From: Rogier Krieger Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" cc: Paul Hamilton Subject: Re: Support for affordable S-ATA RAID controllers (xs4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:49:58 -0000 Hi there Paul, Previous correspondence from Paul Hamilton (15:19 12-1-2004 +0800): >How about the Rocket Raid 1540 or the 1820, 8 drive SATA for ~ AUS$330 >48bit LBA, can do Raid 1 and single drives at the same time. Raid 5 is >slow, because it does software parity checking. Thanks for the tip. I couldn't find it in the 5.2 hardware support pages, though. Highpoint's web site [1] mentions support for FreeBSD 4.x and 5.0. It took me a while to find that info. The 1820 also appears to have support for FreeBSD 5.1, according to the website [2]. I suppose I wasn't looking carefully enough. Cheers, Rogier Krieger References: [1] Highpoint RocketRaid 1540 support page [ http://www.highpoint-tech.com/USA/brr1540.htm ] [2] Highpoint RocketRaid 1820 support page [ http://www.highpoint-tech.com/USA/brr1820.htm ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 02:57:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C7116A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:57:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.wep.tudelft.nl (mx2.wep.tudelft.nl [130.161.83.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2859F43D58 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 02:57:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rogier@virgiel.nl) Received: (qmail 19671 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2004 10:57:24 -0000 Received: from valhalla.iverdahl.local (HELO valhalla) (192.168.100.24) by mail.iverdahl.local with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 10:57:24 -0000 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20040114115719.01212ac0@virgiel.xs4all.nl> Organisation: Iverdahl.net X-Security: 512bit CAST Cypher (SSH reroute) X-Mailer: Rapier v2.5 (BSD/OS v4.2) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:57:19 +0100 To: FreeBSD-questions list From: Rogier Krieger In-Reply-To: <20040113015258.GDTN3322.fed1mtao01.cox.net@SAMBA> References: <3.0.5.32.20040104235707.0123f9c0@virgiel.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: Support for affordable S-ATA RAID controllers (xs4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:57:27 -0000 Previous correspondence from Brent Wiese (18:50 12-1-2004 -0700): >3Ware cards are expensive, but you get what you pay for. Whatever code they >have to optimize the disk use works wonders. About a year ago I bought a set of two Escalades and placed them in NetBSD machines. I believe the driver is a port from the FreeBSD version. It has worked like a charm, starting I installed proper cabling. Until that time, I received various array errors, but nothing that damaged data. Switching to the ATA cables 3ware offers, the problem went away. >From several people (mainly on the NetBSD lists), I heard similar reports that the Escalade 6xxx and 7xxx are sensitive to the ATA cables you use. Apart from that, the Escalades are worth the expense. My main issue here was lacking a budget for them. Cheers, Rogier Krieger From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 04:05:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90AD616A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:05:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from hosea.tallye.com (joel.tallye.com [216.99.199.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 263BA43D54 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:05:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sttng359@hosea.tallye.com) Received: from hosea.tallye.com (hosea.tallye.com [127.0.0.1]) by hosea.tallye.com (8.12.8/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0EC5hZT010517; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:05:43 -0800 Received: (from sttng359@localhost) by hosea.tallye.com (8.12.8/8.12.10/Submit) id i0EC5ftu010515; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:05:41 -0800 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:05:40 -0800 From: "Loren M. Lang" To: Simon Barner Message-ID: <20040114120540.GA9758@alzatex.com> References: <000601c3d909$60a86e90$0500a8c0@fire> <20040112125619.GA3308@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040112125619.GA3308@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-GPG-Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc X-GPG-Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C cc: Alex Zivenko cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xmms - problem - how to fix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:05:46 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 01:56:19PM +0100, Simon Barner wrote: > > I have some problem with my xmms mm player. When I'm treing to > > listen some mp3's it gives me aN error, that I don't know how to fix. > > I have KDE 3.1 if you need this info ^) > > So here it is: > > bash-2.05b$ xmms > > /dev/dsp: Device busy > > /dev/dsp: Device busy > > /* with OSS driver */ > > > > ** WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): Device busy > > > > ** WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): Device busy > > > > ** WARNING **: oss_open(): Failed to open audio device (/dev/dsp): Device busy > > /dev/dsp: Device busy > > I don't know exactly, but if XmmS has an arts output plugin, you should > certainly use it, since arts is KDE's default sound daemon. > I think part of the problem is that he hasn't told xmms to use the esound server, and it's trying to open /dev/dsp which esd already has open. I'm using esd myself because artsd has some problems with playing sound, though it is the better choice, especially if you are using the kde desktop which uses artsd by default. Though I am having one problem with esd, it seems to want to exit after the last client closes it's connection even though I started it manually and didn't give it the -terminate option. Anyone have any ideas why? -- I sense much NT in you. NT leads to Bluescreen. Bluescreen leads to downtime. Downtime leads to suffering. NT is the path to the darkside. Powerful Unix is. Public Key: ftp://ftp.tallye.com/pub/lorenl_pubkey.asc Fingerprint: B3B9 D669 69C9 09EC 1BCD 835A FAF3 7A46 E4A3 280C From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 04:24:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ECB616A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:24:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CAD43D2D for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:23:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from barner@in.tum.de) Received: by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 95B2493FA; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:23:54 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:23:54 +0100 From: Simon Barner To: "Loren M. Lang" Message-ID: <20040114122354.GA21645@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <000601c3d909$60a86e90$0500a8c0@fire> <20040112125619.GA3308@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> <20040114120540.GA9758@alzatex.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040114120540.GA9758@alzatex.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: Alex Zivenko cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xmms - problem - how to fix? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:24:04 -0000 --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Loren M. Lang wrote: [...] > Though I am having one > problem with esd, it seems to want to exit after the last client closes > it's connection even though I started it manually and didn't give it the > -terminate option. Anyone have any ideas why? Hi, I don't have a solution, but I have a similar problem: Sometimes, esd dies after each and every song I play with xmms (I have to press the play button again, which is rather annoying, when you are not in front of your pc and you just want to listen to some music). Perhaps this issue is related to xmms, and not to esd. I am running Gnome 2, and esd is invoked like this: esd -terminate -nobeeps -as 2 -spawnfd 33 Simon --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFABTTaCkn+/eutqCoRAqPUAJ4twXG1ZucoKrYRqtWrz4RSEqqAAQCgksIz qE47ct2LKfA1auXY5WumMw0= =hVj5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 04:45:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F8116A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:45:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp23.singnet.com.sg (smtp23.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679CC43D46 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:45:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from spades@galaxynet.org) Received: from bryanuptrvb0jc (bb-203-125-29-205.singnet.com.sg [203.125.29.205])i0ECjeaj016654 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:45:40 +0800 Message-ID: <034c01c3da9c$55bdc7c0$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> From: "Spades" To: References: <64287.195.141.214.38.1073992712.squirrel@hiwatt.lognet.ch><44k73vld7e.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <02cd01c3da29$2d5b0540$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:45:48 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: recompile kernel problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Spades List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:45:44 -0000 Hi, I installed FreeBSD 4.9-PREREL and recompiled the kernel and got this problem during recompile of kernel. # make depend && make && make install.. (snip) vnode_if.h:876: warning: inlining failed in call to `VOP_UNLOCK' /usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: warning: called from here /usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c: In function `union_inactive': /usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:1705: warning: unused variable `vpp' /usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c: In function `union_unlock': /usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:1803: warning: unused variable `un' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/union. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/compile/CONF. Any solutions around this? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 04:46:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A7316A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:46:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp23.singnet.com.sg (smtp23.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD64443D5A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:46:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from spades@galaxynet.org) Received: from bryanuptrvb0jc (bb-203-125-29-205.singnet.com.sg [203.125.29.205])i0ECk3aj016757 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:46:04 +0800 Message-ID: <035501c3da9c$63848b50$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> From: "Spades" To: Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:46:11 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/union X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Spades List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:46:06 -0000 Hi, I installed FreeBSD 4.9-PREREL and recompiled the kernel and got this problem during recompile of kernel. # make depend && make && make install.. (snip) vnode_if.h:876: warning: inlining failed in call to `VOP_UNLOCK' /usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: warning: called from here /usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c: In function `union_inactive': /usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:1705: warning: unused variable `vpp' /usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c: In function `union_unlock': /usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:1803: warning: unused variable `un' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/union. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/compile/CONF. Any solutions around this? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 04:51:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7901F16A4CF for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:51:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A88543D69 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:51:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from oliverfuchs@onlinehome.de) Received: from [212.227.126.155] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AgkUB-0003gH-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:51:03 +0100 Received: from [217.1.216.184] (helo=oliverfuchs.ath.cx) (TLSv1:EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AgkU9-0003XU-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:51:01 +0100 Received: from oliverfuchs.ath.cx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0ECovrE002258 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:50:57 +0100 Received: (from oliverfuchs1@localhost) by oliverfuchs.ath.cx (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id i0ECopV2002256 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:50:51 +0100 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:50:51 +0100 From: Oliver Fuchs To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040114125051.GA2236@oliverfuchs.ath.cx> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:c2b2791553508cc938db2bcf18721a3c Subject: keybell off in rc.conf disables my keyboard in 5.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:51:13 -0000 Hi, I installed FreeBSD 5.1 with a new kernel (here I only added options VGA_WIDTH90). I want do disable the PC's internal beep, so I added from man rc.conf this to rc.conf: keybell="off". After rebooting I was not able to type in anything with my keyboard at the login - there was absolutely no funtionality (it was dead). Deleting the keybell entry in my rc.conf (via the livesystem CD and the option FIxIt) made the keyboard work again. Can someone point me to the solution of this problem or to some documentation because I am not able to find anything helpfull. Here is my rc.conf file: font8x8="iso15-8x8" font8x14="iso15-8x14" font8x16="iso15-8x16" hostname="bob.bob.de" ifconfig_rl0="inet 10.100.100.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" inetd_enable="YES" kern_securelevel_enable="NO" allscreens_flags="VGA_90x25" keymap="german.iso" linux_enable="YES" moused_enable="YES" saver="daemon" scrnmap="NO" sendmail_enable="YES" sshd_enable="YES" usbd_enable="YES" keybell="off". P.S.: Do disable the beep I set in my .cshrc this: set nobeep But I want to disable generally. Thanx in advance Oliver -- ... don't touch the bang bang fruit From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 04:57:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF57C16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:57:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from rdsnet.ro (smtp.rdsnet.ro [62.231.74.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701BF43D58 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 04:57:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from itetcu@apropo.ro) Received: (qmail 28677 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2004 12:57:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro) (81.196.25.19) by mail.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 12:57:09 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:58:44 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: Spades Message-Id: <20040114145844.730c464e@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> In-Reply-To: <035501c3da9c$63848b50$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> References: <035501c3da9c$63848b50$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.8claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/union X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:57:17 -0000 On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:46:11 +0800 "Spades" wrote: > Hi, > > I installed FreeBSD 4.9-PREREL and recompiled the kernel and > got this problem during recompile of kernel. > > # make depend && make && make install.. > (snip) > vnode_if.h:876: warning: inlining failed in call to `VOP_UNLOCK' > /usr/src/sys/modules/union/../../miscfs/union/union_vnops.c:598: warning: re-cvsup, it has been fixed -- IOnut Unregistered ;) FreeBSD user From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 05:29:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A901F16A4D2 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:29:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp29.singnet.com.sg (smtp29.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE4643D5C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:29:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from spades@galaxynet.org) Received: from bryanuptrvb0jc (bb-203-125-29-205.singnet.com.sg [203.125.29.205])i0EDTMuX030122 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:29:22 +0800 Message-ID: <037301c3daa2$700e5350$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> From: "Spades" To: References: <035501c3da9c$63848b50$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> <20040114145844.730c464e@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 21:29:29 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: wget: Undefined symbol "OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Spades List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:29:31 -0000 Hi, Everytime i do a wget, i get this error.. how do i fix it? # wget http://bitchx.org/files/source/ircii-pana-1.0c19.tar.gz --21:29:39-- http://bitchx.org/files/source/ircii-pana-1.0c19.tar.gz => `ircii-pana-1.0c19.tar.gz' /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: wget: Undefined symbol "OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms" Thanks again. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 05:34:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A85916A4CF for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:34:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from kumprang.or.id (kumprang.or.id [202.143.103.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 43D9943D31 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:33:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from budsz@kumprang.or.id) Received: (qmail 59722 invoked by uid 1008); 14 Jan 2004 13:42:57 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:42:55 +0700 From: budsz To: FreeBSD-Questions Message-ID: <20040114134255.GA59317@kumprang.or.id> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-URL: "http://www.kumprang.or.id/~budsz/" X-URL-GPG: "http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x62695304" X-Pubkey: "http://www.kumprang.or.id/~budsz/pubkey.txt" X-Pubkey-MD5: "http://www.kumprang.or.id/~budsz/pubkey-checksum.md5" X-Finger-Print: "A05A 268C 3CD4 ABBD D9EB 11E1 F64C 4B4E 6269 5304" X-Organization: "Internet Cafe and Game PC Kumprang" X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Subject: Loading balancing with more than one ISP. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:34:12 -0000 --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I was read in this URL: http://www.lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html#AEN293 The questions is: 1. With FreeBSD can do like this?, example with "route(8)"? 2. Does FreeBSD support more than 1 as "defaut gateway" in routing table?? 3. I found some options in /etc/default/rc.conf like "static_routes=3D",=20 if I use "static_routes=3D" _WITHOUT_ defaut gateway (defaultrouter=3D in /etc/rc.conf) it's possible? 4. In that URL using "weight" as prority balancing connection, so in FreeBSD how do this? Thanks You. =20 --=20 budsz --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFABUdf9kxLTmJpUwQRAnQrAJ9sVjkIWqDrgr8qa43hToiClegIQQCgvB+I CjrGdHioP5vTvQjA3XQe7jY= =RXIn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 13 21:47:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00DE416A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:47:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2CA43D1D for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:47:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kevin_lee@att.net) Received: from kevin-7zvaax8t6 (124.kansas-04rh16rt.mo.dial-access.att.net[12.73.207.124]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc12) with SMTP id <2004011405472111200pnfere>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:47:21 +0000 Message-ID: <200401132347180001.1973C7AF@mailhost.worldnet.att.net> X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.30.00.00 (4) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 23:47:18 -0600 From: "Kevin R. Lee" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:36:32 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:47:24 -0000 What does the acronym IA-64 stand for? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 05:51:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD65816A4CF for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:51:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.itxmarket.com (fw.itxmarket.com [213.11.40.109]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D6043D46 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 05:51:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mich@freebsdcluster.net) Received: from freebsdcluster.net (mich2.itxmarket.com [192.168.2.26]) by mail2.itxmarket.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D9D37CB5 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:51:04 +0100 (CET) Received: by freebsdcluster.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 006F922831; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:51:03 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:51:03 +0100 From: "Michael L. Hostbaek" To: questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040114135103.GC3843@mich2.itxmarket.com> Mail-Followup-To: "Michael L. Hostbaek" , questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-RC i386 X-PGP-Key: http://www.freebsdcluster.org/~mich/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: Comm port woes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:51:06 -0000 I have a box running 4.8-REL, its primary function is to provide serial access to cisco routers and switches (for testing purposes). Since last week no data is coming through, when connected to a device with minicom or tip(1) - all settings have been verified and double checked. It is working fine when connected to my FreeBSD laptop. Is the port physically b0rken, or is it possible to somehow clear the line ? Thanks in advance, /mich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 06:04:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C4F16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:04:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.rtl.org (rtl-3.i2k.com [63.94.12.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C0A43D6D for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:04:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jstewart@rtl.org) Received: from mis3c.rtl.lan (rtl-2.i2k.com [63.94.12.206]) by mail.rtl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ECC730AC9; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:03:22 -0500 (EST) Received: by mis3c.rtl.lan (Postfix, from userid 500) id 208A04FD1; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:02:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:02:26 -0500 From: Jason Stewart To: "Kevin R. Lee" Message-ID: <20040114140226.GC4508@rtl.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Kevin R. Lee" , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <200401132347180001.1973C7AF@mailhost.worldnet.att.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401132347180001.1973C7AF@mailhost.worldnet.att.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:04:46 -0000 On 13/01/04 23:47 -0600, Kevin R. Lee wrote: > What does the acronym IA-64 stand for? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list I believe it stands for Intel Architecture 64. A quick google search reveals this page: http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&oi=def&q=http://devrsrc1.external.hp.com/STK/gloss.html A quick search of wikipedia confirms my guess: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IA-64 Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 06:06:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1978116A4CF for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:06:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.lphp.org (APastourelles-107-1-12-56.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.80.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2143743D66 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:06:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) Received: from admin.dioranews.local (modem209.metz.imaginet.fr [195.68.12.209] (may be forged)) by mail.lphp.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0EE61oK038691; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:06:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) From: Antoine Jacoutot To: budsz , FreeBSD-Questions Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:06:07 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20040114134255.GA59317@kumprang.or.id> In-Reply-To: <20040114134255.GA59317@kumprang.or.id> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401141506.07322.ajacoutot@lphp.org> Subject: Re: Loading balancing with more than one ISP. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:06:17 -0000 On Wednesday 14 January 2004 14:42, budsz wrote: > 1. With FreeBSD can do like this?, example with "route(8)"? > 2. Does FreeBSD support more than 1 as "defaut gateway" in routing table?? > 3. I found some options in /etc/default/rc.conf like "static_routes=", > if I use "static_routes=" _WITHOUT_ defaut gateway (defaultrouter= in > /etc/rc.conf) it's possible? > 4. In that URL using "weight" as prority balancing connection, so in > FreeBSD how do this? I've been looking for answers on this for a while but I found nothing nor no-one who could tell me if and how it is possible. Let the list know if you find anything interesting. Antoine From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 06:37:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E2F16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:37:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [12.15.124.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8A043D73 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:37:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from 192.168.2.135 (unknown [12.15.124.131]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89FCEAC; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:39:23 -0600 (CST) From: Chris To: Jason Stewart , "Kevin R. Lee" Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:37:30 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200401132347180001.1973C7AF@mailhost.worldnet.att.net> <20040114140226.GC4508@rtl.org> In-Reply-To: <20040114140226.GC4508@rtl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401140837.30401.racerx@makeworld.com> cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:37:52 -0000 On Wednesday 14 January 2004 08:02 am, Jason Stewart wrote: > On 13/01/04 23:47 -0600, Kevin R. Lee wrote: > > What does the acronym IA-64 stand for? Somehow, I get the feeling this is a troll. And to the troll sending this - www.google.com. USE IT -- Best regards, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 06:43:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D133516A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:43:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEAB343D55 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:43:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.103]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20040114144316.QUWZ21134.mta11.adelphia.net@barbish> for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:43:16 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:43:16 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal Subject: IPFW loadable module & logging X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:43:17 -0000 The IPFW loadable module as delivered by the FBSD install has no logging ability. Is it possibly to enable the logging function by using the sysctl knobs? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 06:46:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE3716A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:46:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ptb-relay01.plus.net (ptb-relay01.plus.net [212.159.14.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3EB43D5E for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:46:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from simong@desktop-guardian.com) Received: from [81.174.227.186] (helo=desktop-guardian.com) by ptb-relay01.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1AgmHr-00089e-Ch for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:46:27 +0000 Received: (qmail 1992 invoked by uid 1006); 14 Jan 2004 14:46:26 -0000 Received: from simong@desktop-guardian.com by dtg25 by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (clamscan: 0.54. spamassassin: 2.55. Clear:. Processed in 27.351246 secs); 14 Jan 2004 14:46:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dtg17) (192.168.0.17) by 192.168.0.25 with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 14:45:53 -0000 Message-ID: <009201c3daad$31d89220$1100a8c0@dtg17> From: "Simon Gray" To: "Antoine Jacoutot" , "budsz" , "FreeBSD-Questions" References: <20040114134255.GA59317@kumprang.or.id> <200401141506.07322.ajacoutot@lphp.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:46:28 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: Loading balancing with more than one ISP. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:46:30 -0000 > I've been looking for answers on this for a while but I found nothing nor > no-one who could tell me if and how it is possible. > Let the list know if you find anything interesting. Easiest way I would of thought would be to use BGP or OSPF under Zebra (/usr/ports/net/zebra)(www.zebra.org) I'm no expert, but the majority if ISPs tend to use BGP and/or OSPF. Not sure how you'd set this up. But hopefully it'll point you in the right direction. HTH Simon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 06:47:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F5016A4CF for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:47:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.pelleg.org (gw.pelleg.org [205.201.13.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC3C43D48 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:47:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from daniel+bsd@pelleg.org) Received: from lank.here (lank.wburn [192.168.3.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits)) (Client CN "gw.pelleg.org", Issuer "Dan Pelleg" (verified OK)) by gw.pelleg.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE6575A53; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:47:22 -0500 (EST) Received: by lank.here (Postfix, from userid 7675) id 5FA828A2; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:47:18 -0500 (EST) To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com References: From: Dan Pelleg Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:47:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: (fbsd user's message of "Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:39:43 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley, berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: Re: IPFW 'keep state' & 'limit' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 14:47:26 -0000 "fbsd_user" writes: > Reading the man page on IPFW rule syntax, I get the impression that > the 'limit' option uses the stateful dynamic rules table. But it's > unclear whether 'keep state' and limit can be used on the same rule, > or if the limit option performs the 'keep state' function in > addition to the limit function. > > So as an example > > $cmd 00390 allow tcp from any to any 22 in via dc0 setup keep-state > limit src-addr 3 > > will this work? > limit implies keep-state, and you should really specify one or the other. If you specify both, ipfw won't complain, but ipfw2 will. So it's best to not do that. -- Dan Pelleg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 07:01:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABA216A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:01:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.lphp.org (APastourelles-107-1-12-56.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.80.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1AB943D5A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:01:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) Received: from admin.dioranews.local (ATuileries-108-2-1-178.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr [217.128.152.178]) by mail.lphp.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0EF1EoK052522; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:01:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) From: Antoine Jacoutot To: "Simon Gray" , "budsz" , "FreeBSD-Questions" Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:01:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20040114134255.GA59317@kumprang.or.id> <200401141506.07322.ajacoutot@lphp.org> <009201c3daad$31d89220$1100a8c0@dtg17> In-Reply-To: <009201c3daad$31d89220$1100a8c0@dtg17> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401141601.28427.ajacoutot@lphp.org> Subject: Re: Loading balancing with more than one ISP. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:01:27 -0000 On Wednesday 14 January 2004 15:46, Simon Gray wrote: > Easiest way I would of thought would be to use BGP or OSPF under Zebra > (/usr/ports/net/zebra)(www.zebra.org) > > I'm no expert, but the majority if ISPs tend to use BGP and/or OSPF. Yes, but one said that for BGP you had to work directly ith your ISP and get its aggrement and all. The thing is I need this using 2 differents ISPs. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 07:14:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D02316A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:14:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F3443D31 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:14:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i0EFDx714503; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:13:59 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200401141513.i0EFDx714503@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: micheas@freep.org Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:13:58 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1074054442.631.79.camel@tux> from "Micheas Herman" at Jan 13, 2004 08:27:22 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: "Kevin R. Lee" Subject: Re: Info. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:14:07 -0000 > > On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 20:13, Kevin R. Lee wrote: > > Sorry, one more question, what does DEC Alpha stand for? > Digital Electric Corporation. (or did before Compaq bought them, before > being bought themselves, by HP) Actually, I think it was Digital Equipment Corporation. DEC was a major vendor for what was then called "Mini" computers - refrigerator sized machines intended for use in labs and engineering workshops. Alpha was one of their brand model lines of work stations. ////jerry > > Micheas > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- > Micheas Herman email: micheas@freep.org > Free Print Shop web: http://www.FreePrintShop.org > phone: (415)648-3222 fax: (415)648-4466 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 07:20:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECED016A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:20:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B0343D75 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:20:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.11.7p1+Sun/8.11.7) id i0EFK9314535; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:20:09 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200401141520.i0EFK9314535@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: kevin_lee@att.net (Kevin R. Lee) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:20:09 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200401132210530434.191B83B7@mailhost.worldnet.att.net> from "Kevin R. Lee" at Jan 13, 2004 10:10:53 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Information X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:20:24 -0000 > > Hello, I was wondering what BSD stands for? Also what does AMD > and Ultra SPARC stand for? Any information would be very helpful. Check out this web page: http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/ This set of pages seems to be either mirrored or cross referenced in a number of places. Keep at least one of the addresses ready at hand - bookmarked. ////jerry > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 07:25:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8E616A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:25:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net (adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net [68.76.19.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B02443D45 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:24:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from luke@foolishgames.com) Received: from [192.168.2.49] (adsl-67-36-56-113.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net [67.36.56.113]) (authenticated bits=0)ESMTP id i0EFOi68066128; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:24:44 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from luke@foolishgames.com) X-Authentication-Warning: adsl-68-76-19-75.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net: Host adsl-67-36-56-113.dsl.klmzmi.ameritech.net [67.36.56.113] claimed to be [192.168.2.49] In-Reply-To: <200401141513.i0EFDx714503@clunix.cl.msu.edu> References: <200401141513.i0EFDx714503@clunix.cl.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v609) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Lucas Holt Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:25:05 -0500 To: Jerry McAllister X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.609) cc: micheas@freep.org cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org cc: "Kevin R. Lee" Subject: Re: Info. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:25:04 -0000 From my understanding a DEC Alpha system contained an Alpha processor. I don't know a lot about them, but I believe they are RISC based and had a portion of the chip that was programmable for the operating system to add custom instructions to. There was a windows NT 4 port to the alpha and DEC and later compaq/hp had a Unix for them as well. Some alpha systems are still in production use. I know a college around here that uses it for a custom security system with keycards. The software they use was never ported to the x86 version (IA32 for people who hate that term) of NT4. Lucas Holt Luke@FoolishGames.com ________________________________________________________ FoolishGames.com (Jewel Fan Site) JustJournal.com (Free blogging) 'Re-implementing what I designed in 1979 is not interesting to me personally. For kids who are 20 years younger than me, Linux is a great way to cut your teeth. It's a cultural phenomenon and a business phenomenon. Mac OS X is a rock-solid system that's beautifully designed. I much prefer it to Linux.' -- Bill Joy, Wired Article 2003 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 07:28:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C05C16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:28:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail1.marathonmultimedia.com (mail1.marathonmultimedia.com [12.47.35.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9EA643D5E for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:28:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from joelg@mail1.marathonmultimedia.com) Received: from mail1.marathonmultimedia.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i0EFSfr7001402 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:28:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from joelg@mail1.marathonmultimedia.com) Received: (from joelg@localhost)i0EFSfV6001401 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:28:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from joelg) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:28:40 -0600 From: Joel Gudknecht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040114152840.GA1393@mail1.marathonmultimedia.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: 5.2-RELEASE multiple panics X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:28:44 -0000 FYI, Running 5.1-RELEASE just fine for about a month. Did a clean/fresh install of 5.2-RELEASE and it has been crashing repeatedly. The system crashes whenever I try to install packages or start any net services. Hardware: Compaq Prosignia 150 Laptop 3com 10/100 LAN CardBus (3CXFE575BT) dmesg: Unable to capture Error: (one of many) cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc075ac2c stack pointer = 0x10:0xcd560970 frame pointer = 0x10:0xcd5b0990 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, IOPL = 0 current process = 412 (sendmail) trap number = 30 panic: unknown/reserved trap cpuid = 0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 07:49:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349B816A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:49:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from jorn.servebeer.com (node-c-0ab6.a2000.nl [62.194.10.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421B543D67 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:49:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jorn@jorn.servebeer.com) Received: from jorn.servebeer.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jorn.servebeer.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 686AE17064 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:47:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from 172.16.1.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jorn) by jorn.servebeer.com with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:47:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <49178.172.16.1.2.1074095247.squirrel@jorn.servebeer.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:47:27 +0100 (CET) From: jorn@jorn.servebeer.com To: questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: Konqueror crash X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:49:11 -0000 Hi all, I'm a happy user of FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE for some time now, but there's something that has been bothering me I always come on a chatbox (a dutch one) which is full of javascripting I think (not sure though). I experience no problems during the chat session, but when I close the window konqueror crashes completely and closes all its active sessions, including file managers and such. I've tried Opera 7, but that browser returns no errors. Also I've tried Mozilla Firebird 0.7 but I can't even start the chat session with that because it's not supported or something. here's the debug report it returns: (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... [Switching to Process 1905, Thread 1] 0x290ba883 in poll () from /usr/lib/libc.so.5 #0 0x290ba883 in poll () from /usr/lib/libc.so.5 #1 0x28795651 in _thread_kern_sched_state_unlock () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.5 #2 0x28795050 in _thread_kern_scheduler () from /usr/lib/libc_r.so.5 I'm running KDE 3.1.4 from the cvsup tree, and I've compiled my own kernel. It has been rock-solid and I've never encountered any crashes other then with konqueror, so I don't believe it's my kernel configuration. Also, I didn't know if this was the proper mailing list, or that I should send it to the KDE mailing lists.If there's any other information required then please let me know. Anyway, thanks in advantage for trying to help me. Cheers, Jorn. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 07:58:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61AC216A4CF for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:58:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.romat.com (mail.romat.com [212.143.245.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF1F43D70 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:57:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gilad_bsd@romat.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.lan [127.0.0.1]) by mail.romat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAC0EB2B8; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:57:54 +0200 (IST) Received: from mail.romat.com ([192.168.1.10]) by localhost (ladon.lan [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 56876-07; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:57:52 +0200 (IST) Received: from romat.com (unknown [192.168.1.199]) by mail.romat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48DD0EB2A9; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:57:52 +0200 (IST) Message-ID: <400565FF.6090908@romat.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:53:35 +0200 From: Gilad Rom Organization: Romat Telecom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030915 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Tancsa References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: kurilov@tscp.ru Subject: Re: vlan support X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:58:03 -0000 Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 12 Jan 2004 09:33:32 +0500, in sentex.lists.freebsd.questions you > wrote: > > >>How do you do! >>ifconfig_vlan2="inet 192.168.100.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 vlan 4 vlandev >>rl0" >> >>Catalyst settings were write because it works with cisco router. >> > > > I am pretty sure the Realtek Driver does not support the larger packet > size to handle 802.1q frames. See man vlan. I have used dc and fxp > based cards with great results, but nothing on the realtek. > > ---Mike > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > I'm sure the realtek supports VLAN in hardware, and I know the 5.2 driver also supports it. I'm not so sure about 4.x, though. Gilad From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 07:58:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E341716A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:58:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562C843D2D for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 07:58:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (BOFH@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0EG0SZr036353; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:00:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) Received: (from bulk@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0EG0MqV036352; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:00:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mail25@bzerk.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ei.bzerk.org: bulk set sender to mail25@bzerk.org using -f Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:00:22 +0100 From: Ruben de Groot To: Antoine Jacoutot Message-ID: <20040114160022.GA36230@ei.bzerk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Ruben de Groot , Antoine Jacoutot , Simon Gray , budsz , FreeBSD-Questions References: <20040114134255.GA59317@kumprang.or.id> <200401141506.07322.ajacoutot@lphp.org> <009201c3daad$31d89220$1100a8c0@dtg17> <200401141601.28427.ajacoutot@lphp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401141601.28427.ajacoutot@lphp.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: Simon Gray cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: Loading balancing with more than one ISP. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 15:58:43 -0000 On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 04:01:28PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot typed: > On Wednesday 14 January 2004 15:46, Simon Gray wrote: > > Easiest way I would of thought would be to use BGP or OSPF under Zebra > > (/usr/ports/net/zebra)(www.zebra.org) > > > > I'm no expert, but the majority if ISPs tend to use BGP and/or OSPF. > > Yes, but one said that for BGP you had to work directly ith your ISP and get > its aggrement and all. > The thing is I need this using 2 differents ISPs. I'm not entirely sure (never used it myself), but I think you can use routed(8), depending on the way you connect to your ISPs. Ruben > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 08:00:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021C516A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:00:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (sea1-dav18.sea1.hotmail.com [207.68.162.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7198B43D96 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:00:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kenzo_chin@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:00:27 -0800 Received: from 209.187.233.158 by sea1-dav18.sea1.hotmail.com with DAV; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:00:26 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [209.187.233.158] X-Originating-Email: [kenzo_chin@hotmail.com] X-Sender: kenzo_chin@hotmail.com From: "Kenzo" To: Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:00:07 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jan 2004 16:00:27.0252 (UTC) FILETIME=[86D59340:01C3DAB7] Subject: cisco card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:00:38 -0000 I'm trying to setup a cisco aironet 350 card on my laptop and I can't seem to figure out why it wont do it. I recompiled my kernel with the device "an" and everything went fine. I added this line to my rc.conf file. ifconfig_an0="DHCP" still doesn't work. I don't see the an device anywhere and I don't see any error messages other than, "interface an does not exist" what can I do? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 08:03:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FCB116A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:03:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp02.wxs.nl (smtp02.wxs.nl [195.121.6.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7081B43D46 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:03:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marco@beishuizen.info) Received: from tsunami.bsd (ipd50a233c.speed.planet.nl [213.10.35.60]) by smtp02.wxs.nl (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.14 (built Mar 18 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HRH00287LU0OG@smtp02.wxs.nl> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:01:12 +0100 (MET) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:54:54 +0100 (CET) From: Marco Beishuizen In-reply-to: <200401132213200785.191DC34F@mailhost.worldnet.att.net> Sender: marco@tsunami.bsd To: "Kevin R. Lee" Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT FreeBSD: Homepage: References: <200401132213200785.191DC34F@mailhost.worldnet.att.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Info. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:03:50 -0000 On stardate Tue, 13 Jan 2004, the wise Kevin R. Lee entered: > Sorry, one more question, what does DEC Alpha stand for? DEC stands for Digital Equipment Corporation. Alpha is the 64-bit processor they make. Digital as a company doesn't exist anymore, Compaq bought it some time ago. I have a Personal Workstation 600au and FreeBSD runs fine on it :) Marco -- Familiarity breeds attempt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 08:06:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9D116A4CE; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:06:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9C943D60; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:06:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([67.20.101.103]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with SMTP id <20040114160642.VEED11313.mta9.adelphia.net@barbish>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:06:42 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Dan Pelleg" Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:06:41 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-reply-to: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Importance: Normal cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Subject: RE: IPFW 'keep state' & 'limit' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:06:44 -0000 The FBSD 5.2 man IPFW does not say anything different that the 4.9 man IPFW. Are you saying the man doc in 5.2 is wrong? 5.2 is using the ipfw2 code for IPFIREWALL I believe. Documenting the fact that 'limit' performs the same function as 'keep state' in additional to 'limit' stated purpose is very important information. Also that 'limit' and 'keep state' can not be coded together is another very important piece information that need to be documented in the man IPFW data. Should this be submitted as an problem report? -----Original Message----- From: Dan Pelleg [mailto:daniel+bsd@pelleg.org] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 9:47 AM To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG Subject: Re: IPFW 'keep state' & 'limit' "fbsd_user" writes: > Reading the man page on IPFW rule syntax, I get the impression that > the 'limit' option uses the stateful dynamic rules table. But it's > unclear whether 'keep state' and limit can be used on the same rule, > or if the limit option performs the 'keep state' function in > addition to the limit function. > > So as an example > > $cmd 00390 allow tcp from any to any 22 in via dc0 setup keep-state > limit src-addr 3 > > will this work? > limit implies keep-state, and you should really specify one or the other. If you specify both, ipfw won't complain, but ipfw2 will. So it's best to not do that. -- Dan Pelleg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 08:12:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED0F616A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:12:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp29.singnet.com.sg (smtp29.singnet.com.sg [165.21.101.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F7B43D2F for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:12:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from spades@galaxynet.org) Received: from bryanuptrvb0jc (bb-203-125-29-205.singnet.com.sg [203.125.29.205])i0EGCDuX020849 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:12:13 +0800 Message-ID: <041e01c3dab9$30b7e970$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> From: "Spades" To: References: <035501c3da9c$63848b50$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc><20040114145844.730c464e@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro> <037301c3daa2$700e5350$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:12:21 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: wget: Undefined symbol"OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Spades List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:12:17 -0000 Hi, Everytime i do a wget, i get this error.. how do i fix it? # wget http://bitchx.org/files/source/ircii-pana-1.0c19.tar.gz --21:29:39-- http://bitchx.org/files/source/ircii-pana-1.0c19.tar.gz => `ircii-pana-1.0c19.tar.gz' /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: wget: Undefined symbol "OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms" Thanks again. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 08:18:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B93216A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:18:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from cloudburst.umist.ac.uk (cloudburst.umist.ac.uk [130.88.119.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83BA43D6B for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:18:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lewiz@black.lewiz.org) Received: from lh014.halls.umist.ac.uk ([130.88.163.14] helo=yellow.lewiz.org) by cloudburst.umist.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Agnj8-0000LT-Fa for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:18:42 +0000 Received: from ip31.lewiz.org ([192.168.0.31] helo=black.lewiz.org) by mail.lewiz.org with smtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1Agnit-00029c-5b for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:18:27 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 9315 invoked by uid 4001); Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:18:32 -0000 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:18:32 +0000 From: Lewis Thompson To: FreeBSD-questions Message-ID: <20040114161831.GA9268@lewiz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5" Content-Disposition: inline X-GPG-Fingerprint: 90A4 939E 3847 A3E4 8103 2A48 22DA B428 542F ED3F X-GPG-Info: http://www.lewiz.org/~lewiz/pgpkey / horowitz.surfnet.nl User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Subject: Network timeout. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:18:52 -0000 --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I'm having problems with my network connection timing out during large transfers. It's connected to a 10Mbit hub so it's not topping out at the card's maximum throughput. Originally I had a Realtek 8139 card but yesterday I dumped that in favour of a Netgear FA311 (sis chipset) and this seemed to solve all timeout problems of sustained transfers (saturating the connection for a sustained period of time). However, I've just had a couple more timeouts in the last few hours. Obviously I was never sure it was the NIC in the first place but I can't ignore the fact I had a good 20GB transferred without problem yesterday (as opposed to usually around 1GB before the card dies). Data is being uploaded to a Samba server, which reports no errors in the log (and I have no problems uploading a 100Mbit from inside my network). The server is running 4.9-RELEASE and the drive the data is going to is a vinum volume (in case that has any bearing). I'm using ipnat to forward port 139 to inside a jail. Finally, my IP is assigned by a DHCP server -- the lease length is 24h but my IP is static (for the last four months, anyway ;). Any suggestions for the best way to go about tracking the problem down? If anybody needs any more details just ask and I'll do my best to provide. Thanks very much, -lewiz. --=20 I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now. --Bob Dylan, 1964. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -| msn:purple@lewiz.net | jabber:lewiz@jabber.org | url:www.lewiz.org |- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFABWvXItq0KFQv7T8RAjvWAKCKEbGrqGMUgrMATgTQPbt0Ndpy8wCfW625 YsZJsNwkojzPMVcIiiowQIU= =HWLN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 08:30:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF9816A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:30:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.seekingfire.com (coyote.seekingfire.com [24.72.10.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D04843D69 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:30:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tillman@seekingfire.com) Received: by mail.seekingfire.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9CA68266; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:30:43 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:30:43 -0600 From: Tillman Hodgson To: FreeBSD-Questions Message-ID: <20040114163043.GL415@seekingfire.com> References: <20040114134255.GA59317@kumprang.or.id> <200401141506.07322.ajacoutot@lphp.org> <009201c3daad$31d89220$1100a8c0@dtg17> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <009201c3daad$31d89220$1100a8c0@dtg17> X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . X-GPG-Key-ID: 828AFC7B X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5584 14BA C9EB 1524 0E68 F543 0F0A 7FBC 828A FC7B X-GPG-Key: http://www.seekingfire.com/gpg_key.asc X-Urban-Legend: There is lots of hidden information in headers User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: Re: Loading balancing with more than one ISP. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:30:48 -0000 On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:46:28PM -0000, Simon Gray wrote: > > I've been looking for answers on this for a while but I found nothing nor > > no-one who could tell me if and how it is possible. > > Let the list know if you find anything interesting. > > Easiest way I would of thought would be to use BGP or OSPF under Zebra > (/usr/ports/net/zebra)(www.zebra.org) I'm a heavy Zebra (migrating to Quagga) user. Using dynamic routing is very handy, but it won't solve the problem of balancing load across two connections. Zebra (or any dynamic routing daemon) only makes routing *decisions* and then places the results of those decisions into the regular kernel routing table. It doesn't actually route the packets, the regular kernel routing mechanism still does that. FreeBSD doesn't allow routes to identical destinations with different gateways. For a previous (and recent) thread on this, see http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-i386/2003-October/000340.html. So you can't round-robin between two default gateways. You /can/, however, send traffic for different destinations out of different links. For example, I send my nightly CVSup traffic and other automated downloads out of a regular ADSL link in order to prevent swamping my main link. If your upstream providers support dynamic routing protocols, then you can get that destination information automatically. But that's not the same as load balancing, it's best-path selection. -T -- Money is truthful. If a man speaks of his honor, make him pay cash. - Robert Heinlein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 08:39:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1310D16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:39:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from trmx001.dot.ca.gov (svhqsacsmtp01.dot.ca.gov [64.174.7.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E4B43D1D for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:39:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Lee_Shackelford@dot.ca.gov) To: questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8 June 18, 2001 Message-ID: From: Lee_Shackelford@dot.ca.gov Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:39:41 -0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on SACSMTP01/SVR/Caltrans/CAGov(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 01/14/2004 08:39:43 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: choice of boot manager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:39:46 -0000 Good morning, FreeBSD enthusiasts. I am planning a multiple operating system installation on a Compaq Proliant 5000. The purpose of the installation is hobbyist and instructional. The computer does not provide network management services. The proposed operating systems are Windows 95, FreeBSD, and Windows 2000 Server. A fourth operating system may be added at a later date. Have you had any experience with any of the following boot manager programs that may suggest their relative applicability to this project? The boot manager programs I am considering include the following: LILO, GRUB, MATT, NTLDR/BOOT.INI, RANISH, and the boot loader that comes with FreeBSD, the name of which I do not know. Any information about positive or negative experiences with any of these programs in a multiple operating system configuration would be appreciated. Your truly, Lee Shackelford L e e underscore S h a c k e l f o r d at d o t dot c a dot g o v From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 08:44:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574E116A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:44:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from trmx001.dot.ca.gov (svhqsacsmtp01.dot.ca.gov [64.174.7.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84A943D5A for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:44:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Lee_Shackelford@dot.ca.gov) To: questions@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.8 June 18, 2001 Message-ID: From: Lee_Shackelford@dot.ca.gov Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:44:08 -0800 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on SACSMTP01/SVR/Caltrans/CAGov(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at 01/14/2004 08:44:12 AM MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: choice of boot manager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:44:15 -0000 Dear FreeBSD enthusiast, In the list included on the original message, I forgot to mention the shareware version of OS-BS boot manager program. Thanks for your assistance. Yours truly, Lee Shackelford ----- Forwarded by Lee Shackelford/HQ/Caltrans/CAGov on 01/14/2004 08:42 AM ----- Lee Shackelford To: questions@freebsd.org cc: 01/14/2004 Subject: choice of boot manager 08:39 AM Good morning, FreeBSD enthusiasts. I am planning a multiple operating system installation on a Compaq Proliant 5000. The purpose of the installation is hobbyist and instructional. The computer does not provide network management services. The proposed operating systems are Windows 95, FreeBSD, and Windows 2000 Server. A fourth operating system may be added at a later date. Have you had any experience with any of the following boot manager programs that may suggest their relative applicability to this project? The boot manager programs I am considering include the following: LILO, GRUB, MATT, NTLDR/BOOT.INI, RANISH, and the boot loader that comes with FreeBSD, the name of which I do not know. Any information about positive or negative experiences with any of these programs in a multiple operating system configuration would be appreciated. Your truly, Lee Shackelford L e e underscore S h a c k e l f o r d at d o t dot c a dot g o v From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 08:46:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D7716A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:46:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from ptb-relay01.plus.net (ptb-relay01.plus.net [212.159.14.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245DB43D64 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:46:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from simong@desktop-guardian.com) Received: from [81.174.227.186] (helo=desktop-guardian.com) by ptb-relay01.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1Ago9j-000C0A-0v for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:46:11 +0000 Received: (qmail 3324 invoked by uid 1006); 14 Jan 2004 16:45:58 -0000 Received: from simong@desktop-guardian.com by dtg25 by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (clamscan: 0.54. spamassassin: 2.55. Clear:. Processed in 834.139042 secs); 14 Jan 2004 16:45:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dtg17) (192.168.0.17) by 192.168.0.25 with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 16:31:59 -0000 Message-ID: <00d401c3dabc$03e45bb0$1100a8c0@dtg17> From: "Simon Gray" To: "Spades" , References: <035501c3da9c$63848b50$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc><20040114145844.730c464e@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro><037301c3daa2$700e5350$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> <041e01c3dab9$30b7e970$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:32:33 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: wget: Undefinedsymbol"OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:46:14 -0000 > Everytime i do a wget, i get this error.. how do i fix it? > > # wget http://bitchx.org/files/source/ircii-pana-1.0c19.tar.gz > --21:29:39-- http://bitchx.org/files/source/ircii-pana-1.0c19.tar.gz > => `ircii-pana-1.0c19.tar.gz' > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: wget: Undefined symbol > "OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms" Looks like it's been compiled against something that's changed. See what: Have you tried rebuilding wget? cd /usr/ports/ftp/wget && make deinstall && make reinstall if that doesn't work you could try building it without ssl support i think >> 'make --WITHOUT_SSL && make install' << should work HTH Simon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 08:46:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E9516A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:46:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from ptb-relay01.plus.net (ptb-relay01.plus.net [212.159.14.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FB543D5C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:46:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from simong@desktop-guardian.com) Received: from [81.174.227.186] (helo=desktop-guardian.com) by ptb-relay01.plus.net with smtp (Exim) id 1Ago9n-000C0h-BE for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:46:15 +0000 Received: (qmail 3326 invoked by uid 1006); 14 Jan 2004 16:45:59 -0000 Received: from simong@desktop-guardian.com by dtg25 by uid 82 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (clamscan: 0.54. spamassassin: 2.55. Clear:. Processed in 749.432938 secs); 14 Jan 2004 16:45:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dtg17) (192.168.0.17) by 192.168.0.25 with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 16:33:02 -0000 Message-ID: <00dc01c3dabc$294e73e0$1100a8c0@dtg17> From: "Simon Gray" To: "Spades" , References: <035501c3da9c$63848b50$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc><20040114145844.730c464e@it.buh.cameradicommercio.ro><037301c3daa2$700e5350$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> <041e01c3dab9$30b7e970$fa10fea9@bryanuptrvb0jc> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:33:28 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: wget: Undefinedsymbol"OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:46:25 -0000 > Everytime i do a wget, i get this error.. how do i fix it? > > # wget http://bitchx.org/files/source/ircii-pana-1.0c19.tar.gz > --21:29:39-- http://bitchx.org/files/source/ircii-pana-1.0c19.tar.gz > => `ircii-pana-1.0c19.tar.gz' > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: wget: Undefined symbol > "OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms" Looks like it's been compiled against something that's changed. See what you get with: ls /usr/libexec/ld-elf* Could always try without ssl support by rebuilding wget? cd /usr/ports/ftp/wget && make deinstall && make reinstall if that doesn't work you could try building it without ssl support i think >> 'make --WITHOUT_SSL && make install' << should work HTH Simon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 08:47:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77A616A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:47:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net (heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071F243D83 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:47:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 22-15.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.22.15] helo=yoda.datawok.com) by heron.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AgoAV-0004re-00 for questions@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 08:46:59 -0800 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:47:01 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401141047.01175.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b3f933dbae7854a8c229a3077fc9c7730350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Subject: FYI - Burned DVD-R on FreeBSD 4.9 STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:47:21 -0000 A while ago there was an email thread regarding the possibility of burning DVD-R's using dvd+rw-tools. My first attempt to do so failed when using a Memorex DVD-R. Since someone else posted problems creating a bootable CD using Memorex media, I tried again using another brand. My second attempt, using an imation DVD-R, was successful: OS: FreeBSD 4.9 STABLE Port: dvd+rw-tools-5.13.4.7.4 Burner: SONY DVD RW DRU-500A DVD-R: imation DVD-R 4.7GB - Data DVD-R for general version 2.0 The following command, executed by root, burned all of the files in the current working directory (2.7GB) to a new DVD-R (not mounted) at /dev/cd0c: growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/cd0c -r -l ./* The resulting DVD-R was readable by the burner and by: Samsung CDRW/DVD SM-352B (WinXP Pro on desktop PC) Toshiba DVD-ROM SD-R2102 (Win2K Pro and FreeBSD 4.9 Stable on laptop) Caveat: I have read the text files on the DVD-R; but I have not tried to reload the database backup files. Best of luck, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 09:00:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4C616A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:00:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobilis.com (host51.216.41.46.conversent.net [216.41.46.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2227643D70 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:00:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jwilson@nobilis.com) content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.5762.3 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:58:24 -0500 Message-ID: <76CBA4753FF32448894B0E13B59C96B852B25E@yoda.us.nobilis.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: FreeBSD and Best Practical RT Thread-Index: AcPav5/AnWoIXfQbThixBGeZ97fJlw== From: "Jason Wilson" To: Subject: FreeBSD and Best Practical RT X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:00:20 -0000 Forgive me if I'm addressing the wrong audience here, but I posted this to the RT list about a month ago and got no response, so I thought maybe someone who knew FreeBSD and Perl a bit more intimately might be able to shed some light on this for me. I was going through the install of rt 3.0.7_01 and it seems I came up against a wall. I was able create/modify/manage tickets/queues/users from the web interface, but whenever I submitted a message via e-mail, I kept seeing the same error message in my mail log file: MIME::Parser: can't open tmpfile: Invalid argument I'm guessing that this is a permission issue somewhere with needed to open up a temporary file somewhere when processing the attachment, but where I can't seem to locate. I dug around in the archive and found a message about modifying one of the modules where the tmpfile call is made. Modifying the sub _SetupMIMEParser function by adding a $parser->tmp_to_core(0) call after the $parser->output_to_core(0) call keeps the error from happening and makes e-mail communication with RT work. So the question - can someone point me in the right direction as to why RT, or more specifically MIME::Parser, is having problems opening a tempfile when processing e-mails? Fixing the problem is one thing - knowing why is another... can anyone shed some light on this for me? System Info: FreeBSD 5.0, Perl 5.8.0, Required Perl Modules up to date as of December 10th, Apache 1.3.29, mod_perl 1.29 statically compiled into Apache. Thanks in advance. Jason Wilson Nobilis Software ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~- "Yes, we ARE a bunch of anal, short-tempered, quick to fly-off-the-handle, sarcastic, know-it-alls. That's what running networks does to you."=20 - James Fischer (inet-access) ~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~-~- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 09:08:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD8D16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:08:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from dyer.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-83.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0268543D99 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:07:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from circlesquared.com (localhost.petanna.net [127.0.0.1]) i0EH94Bn051888; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:09:16 GMT (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Message-ID: <400577B0.90708@circlesquared.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:09:04 +0000 From: Peter Risdon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20031102 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lee_Shackelford@dot.ca.gov References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: choice of boot manager X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:08:14 -0000 Lee_Shackelford@dot.ca.gov wrote: >not know. Any information about positive or negative experiences with any >of these programs in a multiple operating system configuration would be >appreciated. > > This isn't on your list, but I tried using the romantically named "gag" graphical bootloader http://gag.sourceforge.net/ after a few probs with an OpenBSD/W98 installation, and found it extremely good. It's what I use for customers' dual boot machines now because it's quick to install, easy to configure, reliable and pretty. PWR. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 09:09:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26C416A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:09:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.netinfo.bg (www.netinfo.bg [194.153.145.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F012043D31 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:08:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zhechev@abv.bg) Received: from webmail.gyuvetch.bg (storage.ni.bg [192.168.151.33]) by www.netinfo.bg (Postfix) with SMTP id 7544F16043C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:08:57 +0200 (EET) Received: (qmail 18987 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2004 17:08:44 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO storage.ni.bg) (127.0.0.1) by 0 with SMTP; 14 Jan 2004 17:08:44 -0000 Message-ID: <70162099.1074100124455.JavaMail.nobody@storage.ni.bg> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:08:44 +0200 (EET) From: Zh Zhechev To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1251" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AbvMail 1.0 X-Originating-IP: 80.72.80.146 Subject: kernel problem with freebsd 5.2RC2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:09:36 -0000 hi all, make buildkernel KERNCONF=FREESBIEKERNEL -the kernel- # # FREESBIEKERNEL # # For more information on this file, please read the handbook section on # Kernel Configuration Files: # # http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-config.html # # The handbook is also available locally in /usr/share/doc/handbook # if you've installed the doc distribution, otherwise always see the # FreeBSD World Wide Web server (http://www.FreeBSD.org/) for the # latest information. # # An exhaustive list of options and more detailed explanations of the # device lines is also present in the ../../conf/NOTES and NOTES files. # If you are in doubt as to the purpose or necessity of a line, check first # in NOTES. # # $FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC,v 1.394.2.2 2003/12/07 23:52:53 scottl Exp $ machine i386 #cpu I486_CPU cpu I586_CPU cpu I686_CPU ident FREESBIEKERNEL #To statically compile in device wiring instead of /boot/device.hints #hints "GENERIC.hints" #Default places to look for devices. #makeoptions DEBUG=-g #Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols options SCHED_4BSD #4BSD scheduler options INET #InterNETworking options INET6 #IPv6 communications protocols options FFS #Berkeley Fast Filesystem options SOFTUPDATES #Enable FFS soft updates support options UFS_ACL #Support for access control lists options UFS_DIRHASH #Improve performance on big directories options MD_ROOT #MD is a potential root device options NFSCLIENT #Network Filesystem Client options NFSSERVER #Network Filesystem Server options NFS_ROOT #NFS usable as /, requires NFSCLIENT options MSDOSFS #MSDOS Filesystem options CD9660 #ISO 9660 Filesystem options PROCFS #Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS) options PSEUDOFS #Pseudo-filesystem framework options COMPAT_43 #Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 #Compatible with FreeBSD4 options SCSI_DELAY=15000 #Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI options KTRACE #ktrace(1) support options SYSVSHM #SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG #SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM #SYSV-style semaphores options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING #Posix P1003_1B real-time extensions options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev options AHC_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug # output. Adds ~128k to driver. options AHD_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug # output. Adds ~215k to driver. # Debugging for use in -current #options DDB #Enable the kernel debugger #options INVARIANTS #Enable calls of extra sanity checking options INVARIANT_SUPPORT #Extra sanity checks of internal structures, required b y INVARIANTS #options WITNESS #Enable checks to detect deadlocks and cycles #options WITNESS_SKIPSPIN #Don't run witness on spinlocks for speed # To make an SMP kernel, the next two are needed options SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel device apic # I/O APIC device isa device eisa device pci # Floppy drives device fdc # ATA and ATAPI devices device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives device ataraid # ATA RAID drives device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives device atapist # ATAPI tape drives options ATA_STATIC_ID #Static device numbering ## SCSI Controllers #device ahb # EISA AHA1742 family #device ahc # AHA2940 and onboard AIC7xxx devices #device ahd # AHA39320/29320 and onboard AIC79xx devices #device amd # AMD 53C974 (Tekram DC-390(T)) #device isp # Qlogic family #device mpt # LSI-Logic MPT-Fusion ##device ncr # NCR/Symbios Logic #device sym # NCR/Symbios Logic (newer chipsets + those of `ncr') #device trm # Tekram DC395U/UW/F DC315U adapters # #device adv # Advansys SCSI adapters #device adw # Advansys wide SCSI adapters #device aha # Adaptec 154x SCSI adapters #device aic # Adaptec 15[012]x SCSI adapters, AIC-6[23]60. #device bt # Buslogic/Mylex MultiMaster SCSI adapters # #device ncv # NCR 53C500 #device nsp # Workbit Ninja SCSI-3 #device stg # TMC 18C30/18C50 # ## SCSI peripherals #device scbus # SCSI bus (required for SCSI) #device ch # SCSI media changers #device da # Direct Access (disks) #device sa # Sequential Access (tape etc) #device cd # CD #device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access) #device ses # SCSI Environmental Services (and SAF-TE) # ## RAID controllers interfaced to the SCSI subsystem #device amr # AMI MegaRAID #device asr # DPT SmartRAID V, VI and Adaptec SCSI RAID #device ciss # Compaq Smart RAID 5* #device dpt # DPT Smartcache III, IV - See NOTES for options #device iir # Intel Integrated RAID #device ips # IBM (Adaptec) ServeRAID #device mly # Mylex AcceleRAID/eXtremeRAID # ## RAID controllers #device aac # Adaptec FSA RAID #device aacp # SCSI passthrough for aac (requires CAM) #device ida # Compaq Smart RAID #device mlx # Mylex DAC960 family #device pst # Promise Supertrak SX6000 #device twe # 3ware ATA RAID # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller device atkbd # AT keyboard device psm # PS/2 mouse device vga # VGA video card driver device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console device sc # Sound Blaster device pcm device sbc # Enable this for the pcvt (VT220 compatible) console driver #device vt #options XSERVER # support for X server on a vt console #options FAT_CURSOR # start with block cursor device agp # support several AGP chipsets # Floating point support - do not disable. device npx # Power management support (see NOTES for more options) #device apm # Add suspend/resume support for the i8254. device pmtimer # PCCARD (PCMCIA) support # Pcmcia and cardbus bridge support device cbb # cardbus (yenta) bridge #device pcic # ExCA ISA and PCI bridges device pccard # PC Card (16-bit) bus device cardbus # CardBus (32-bit) bus # Serial (COM) ports device sio # 8250, 16[45]50 based serial ports # Parallel port device ppc device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) device lpt # Printer device plip # TCP/IP over parallel device ppi # Parallel port interface device #device vpo # Requires scbus and da # If you've got a "dumb" serial or parallel PCI card that is # supported by the puc(4) glue driver, uncomment the following # line to enable it (connects to the sio and/or ppc drivers): #device puc ## PCI Ethernet NICs. #device de # DEC/Intel DC21x4x (``Tulip'') #device em # Intel PRO/1000 adapter Gigabit Ethernet Card #device txp # 3Com 3cR990 (``Typhoon'') #device vx # 3Com 3c590, 3c595 (``Vortex'') # PCI Ethernet NICs that use the common MII bus controller code. # NOTE: Be sure to keep the 'device miibus' line in order to use these NICs! device miibus # MII bus support #device bfe # Broadcom BCM440x 10/100 ethernet #device bge # Broadcom BCM570xx Gigabit Ethernet #device dc # DEC/Intel 21143 and various workalikes #device fxp # Intel EtherExpress PRO/100B (82557, 82558) #device pcn # AMD Am79C97x PCI 10/100 (precedence over 'lnc') #device re # RealTek 8139C+/8169/8169S/8110S device rl # RealTek 8129/8139 #device sf # Adaptec AIC-6915 (``Starfire'') #device sis # Silicon Integrated Systems SiS 900/SiS 7016 #device sk # SysKonnect SK-984x and SK-982x gigabit ethernet #device ste # Sundance ST201 (D-Link DFE-550TX) #device ti # Alteon Networks Tigon I/II gigabit ethernet #device tl # Texas Instruments ThunderLAN #device tx # SMC EtherPower II (83c170 ``EPIC'') #device vr # VIA Rhine, Rhine II #device wb # Winbond W89C840F #device xl # 3Com 3c90x (``Boomerang'', ``Cyclone'') # ## ISA Ethernet NICs. pccard nics included. #device cs # Crystal Semiconductor CS89x0 NIC ## 'device ed' requires 'device miibus' #device ed # NE[12]000, SMC Ultra, 3c503, DS8390 cards #device ex # Intel EtherExpress Pro/10 and Pro/10+ #device ep # Etherlink III based cards #device fe # Fujitsu MB8696x based cards #device ie # EtherExpress 8/16, 3C507, StarLAN 10 etc. #device lnc # NE2100, NE32-VL Lance Ethernet cards #device sn # SMC's 9000 series of ethernet chips #device xe # Xircom pccard ethernet # ## ISA devices that use the old ISA shims ##device le # ## Wireless NIC cards #device wlan # 802.11 support #device an # Aironet 4500/4800 802.11 wireless NICs. #device awi # BayStack 660 and others #device wi # WaveLAN/Intersil/Symbol 802.11 wireless NICs. ##device wl # Older non 802.11 Wavelan wireless NIC. # Pseudo devices - the number indicates how many units to allocate. device random # Entropy device device loop # Network loopback device ether # Ethernet support device sl # Kernel SLIP device ppp # Kernel PPP device tun # Packet tunnel. device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) device md # Memory "disks" device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling device faith # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation) # The `bpf' device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter. # Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this! device bpf # Berkeley packet filter # USB support device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface device usb # USB Bus (required) #device udbp # USB Double Bulk Pipe devices device ugen # Generic device uhid # "Human Interface Devices" device ukbd # Keyboard device ulpt # Printer device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da device ums # Mouse #device urio # Diamond Rio 500 MP3 player #device uscanner # Scanners ## USB Ethernet, requires mii #device aue # ADMtek USB ethernet #device axe # ASIX Electronics USB ethernet #device cue # CATC USB ethernet #device kue # Kawasaki LSI USB ethernet # ## FireWire support #device firewire # FireWire bus code #device sbp # SCSI over FireWire (Requires scbus and da) #device fwe # Ethernet over FireWire (non-standard!) -and the error is: c -shared -nostdlib hack.c -o hack.So rm -f hack.c sh /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh FREESBIEKERNEL cc -c -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/ath/freebsd -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ngatm -D_KERNEL -include opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=15000 -fno-strict-aliasing -mno-align-long-strings -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -ffreestanding -Werror vers.c linking kernel umass.o: In function `umass_cam_attach_sim': umass.o(.text+0x17e3): undefined reference to `cam_simq_alloc' umass.o(.text+0x1834): undefined reference to `cam_sim_alloc' umass.o(.text+0x1843): undefined reference to `cam_simq_free' umass.o(.text+0x1865): undefined reference to `xpt_bus_register' umass.o: In function `umass_cam_rescan_callback': umass.o(.text+0x1893): undefined reference to `xpt_free_path' umass.o: In function `umass_cam_rescan': umass.o(.text+0x1908): undefined reference to `xpt_periph' umass.o(.text+0x1917): undefined reference to `xpt_create_path' umass.o(.text+0x1933): undefined reference to `xpt_setup_ccb' umass.o(.text+0x1950): undefined reference to `xpt_action' umass.o: In function `umass_cam_detach_sim': umass.o(.text+0x1a5c): undefined reference to `xpt_bus_deregister' umass.o(.text+0x1a78): undefined reference to `cam_sim_free' umass.o: In function `umass_cam_action': umass.o(.text+0x1e60): undefined reference to `cam_calc_geometry' umass.o(.text+0x1e71): undefined reference to `xpt_done' umass.o: In function `umass_cam_cb': umass.o(.text+0x1feb): undefined reference to `xpt_done' umass.o: In function `umass_cam_sense_cb': umass.o(.text+0x2154): undefined reference to `xpt_done' umass.o: In function `umass_cam_quirk_cb': umass.o(.text+0x218b): undefined reference to `xpt_done' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FREESBIEKERNEL. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. ----------------------------------------------------------------- http://www.Elmaz.com - Çàïîçíàíñòâà From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 09:15:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913F716A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:15:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from dyer.circlesquared.com (host217-45-219-83.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.45.219.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 360A343D49 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:15:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Received: from circlesquared.com (localhost.petanna.net [127.0.0.1]) i0EHH6Bn051910; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:17:20 GMT (envelope-from peter@circlesquared.com) Message-ID: <40057992.6070105@circlesquared.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:17:06 +0000 From: Peter Risdon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20031102 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zh Zhechev References: <70162099.1074100124455.JavaMail.nobody@storage.ni.bg> In-Reply-To: <70162099.1074100124455.JavaMail.nobody@storage.ni.bg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel problem with freebsd 5.2RC2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:15:59 -0000 Zh Zhechev wrote: >hi all, > >make buildkernel KERNCONF=FREESBIEKERNEL > > The error comes while compiling umass. From your kernel conf: device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da and from higher up in the same file: >## SCSI peripherals >#device scbus # SCSI bus (required for SCSI) >#device ch # SCSI media changers >#device da # Direct Access (disks) >#device sa # Sequential Access (tape etc) >#device cd # CD >#device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access) >#device ses # SCSI Environmental Services (and SAF-TE) > > So uncomment scbus and da and try again. PWR. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 09:21:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 493CA16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:21:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.lphp.org (APastourelles-107-1-12-56.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.80.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9F643D5E for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:21:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) Received: from admin.dioranews.local (ATuileries-108-2-1-178.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr [217.128.152.178]) by mail.lphp.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0EHL3cV091732; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:21:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) From: Antoine Jacoutot To: Ruben de Groot Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:21:19 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20040114134255.GA59317@kumprang.or.id> <200401141601.28427.ajacoutot@lphp.org> <20040114160022.GA36230@ei.bzerk.org> In-Reply-To: <20040114160022.GA36230@ei.bzerk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401141821.19158.ajacoutot@lphp.org> cc: Simon Gray cc: FreeBSD-Questions Subject: Re: Loading balancing with more than one ISP. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:21:23 -0000 On Wednesday 14 January 2004 17:00, Ruben de Groot wrote: > I'm not entirely sure (never used it myself), but I think you can use > routed(8), depending on the way you connect to your ISPs. I have one ethernet <--> router and one ethernet <--> dsl modem connections to connect to my ISPs. As you said, you're not sure about routed... Actually, I did not find anyone who actually make this configuration worked, everyone tells me that this might or might not work. Anyway, I'm not looking for an howto nor a tutorial, I just want to know if there's a software that's able to do this, and then I'll learn it :) Antoine From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 09:25:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F211016A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:25:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from quintero.emmplus.ie (quintero.emmplus.ie [62.17.172.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 372FF43D46 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:25:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jev@ecad.org) Received: from ecad.org (manson.emmplus.ie [62.17.172.66]) by quintero.emmplus.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95CC8C944D for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:23:53 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <40057B75.1070000@ecad.org> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:25:09 +0000 From: Jev User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031115 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: vexira AV on 5.2-REL X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:25:11 -0000 Hi all, Is there anyone running Central Commands Vexira AV for mailservers on freebsd 5.2-RELEASE? Any hickups etc? Thanks, -Jev From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 09:27:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB2F16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:27:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.lphp.org (APastourelles-107-1-12-56.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.80.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6472943D5F for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:27:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) Received: from admin.dioranews.local (ATuileries-108-2-1-178.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr [217.128.152.178]) by mail.lphp.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0EHREcV091780; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:27:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) From: Antoine Jacoutot To: Tillman Hodgson , FreeBSD-Questions Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:27:30 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20040114134255.GA59317@kumprang.or.id> <009201c3daad$31d89220$1100a8c0@dtg17> <20040114163043.GL415@seekingfire.com> In-Reply-To: <20040114163043.GL415@seekingfire.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401141827.30569.ajacoutot@lphp.org> Subject: Re: Loading balancing with more than one ISP. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:27:23 -0000 On Wednesday 14 January 2004 17:30, Tillman Hodgson wrote: > I'm a heavy Zebra (migrating to Quagga) user. Using dynamic routing is > very handy, but it won't solve the problem of balancing load across two > connections. Thanks for the feedback :) > So you can't round-robin between two default gateways. You /can/, > however, send traffic for different destinations out of different links. > For example, I send my nightly CVSup traffic and other automated > downloads out of a regular ADSL link in order to prevent swamping my > main link. What I'm hoping to do is find a way to route all paquets coming: - from DMZ to internet, using NET connexion1 - from LAN to internet, using NET connection2 To be more understandable, something like this: route add from DMZ defaut em0 route add from LAN defaut em1 --> I know it is not a real command line, it's just to make things clearer. > If your upstream providers support dynamic routing protocols, then you > can get that destination information automatically. But that's not the > same as load balancing, it's best-path selection. And if it doesn't ? Anyway thanks a lot for answering. Regards, Antoine From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 09:30:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C5016A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:30:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mazzite.fhcrc.org (mazzite.fhcrc.org [140.107.152.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B630343D5C for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:30:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jgoodlea@fhcrc.org) Received: from e500b.fhcrc.org (e500b.fhcrc.org [140.107.52.110]) i0EHUQLt015082 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:30:26 -0800 Received: from jarlite.fhcrc.org(140.107.42.11) by e500b.fhcrc.org via csmap id 12023; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:28:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from shemp.fhcrc.org (shemp.fhcrc.org [140.107.42.41]) i0EHUPRC002420 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:30:25 -0800 Received: by shemp.fhcrc.org with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:30:24 -0800 Message-ID: From: "Goodleaf, John M" To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:30:20 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain X-FHCRC: INTERNAL Subject: buildworld failure 4.9 Stable --> 5.2 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:30:30 -0000 Hello, I'm trying to upgrade a system from 4.9 (Stable) to 5.2 release. I get a buildworld failure with aand error that reads like this: In file included from /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.c:62: /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.h:41:24: sys/_types.h: No such file or directory In file included from /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.c:62: /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.h:49: error: syntax error before "size_t" /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.h:49: warning: useless keyword or type name in empty declaration /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.h:49: warning: empty declaration /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.h:54: error: syntax error before "ssize_t" /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.h:54: warning: useless keyword or type name in empty declaration /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.h:54: warning: empty declaration Any ideas how to fix this? Thanks, John PS My make.conf file looks like this: MODULES_WITH_WORLD=true USA_RESIDENT=YES CFLAGS= -O -pipe NOGAMES= true NOINFO= true NOFORTRAN= true NO_LPR= true KERNCONF=CLYDE NO_SENDMAIL= true COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe CPUTYPE= pentium4 CXXFLAGS+= -fmemoize-lookups -fsave-memoized PERL_VER=5.8.1 PERL_VERSION=5.8.1 PERL_ARCH=mach NOPERL=yo NO_PERL=yo NO_PERL_WRAPPER=yo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 09:36:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B254316A4CF for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:36:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.mi.celestial.com (dagney.celestial.com [192.136.111.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347FC43D2D for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:36:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bill@celestial.com) Received: by mail.mi.celestial.com (Postfix, from userid 203) id ECA8911E89F; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:36:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:36:00 -0800 From: Bill Campbell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040114173600.GB12257@alexis.mi.celestial.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1074015147.191.2.camel@fbtab.h3p.co.za> <200401140414.i0E4Eval059290@fw.farid-hajji.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401140414.i0E4Eval059290@fw.farid-hajji.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: learning source X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@celestial.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:36:02 -0000 On Wed, Jan 14, 2004, Cordula's Web wrote: >> i have studied C++ and am currently going through C. >> i have been programming small programs in a windows environment. >> i want to start understanding source and help program for bsd and open >> source. >> where can i start, im totally new and i want to know how things work. >> i need advice > >"Advanced Programming in the Unix Environment" >by W. Richard Stevens (Addison-Wesley) may be >very useful, if you know enough C and would >like to interface to any Unix-like operating >system (including FreeBSD). Another oldie but goodie is Kernighan and Pike's ``Unix Programming Environment'' -- ISBN 0-13-937699-2, 0-13-937681-X (pbk). Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC UUCP: camco!bill PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 URL: http://www.celestial.com/ Instead of giving money to found colleges to promote learning, why don't they pass a constitutional amendment prohibiting anybody from learning anything? If it works as good as the Prohibition one did, why, in five years we would have the smartest race of people on earth. -- The Best of Will Rogers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 09:44:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBEFD16A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:44:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from web41403.mail.yahoo.com (web41403.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.93.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B837543D1F for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:44:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from davemac11@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040114174451.11842.qmail@web41403.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [168.91.4.66] by web41403.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:44:51 PST Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:44:51 -0800 (PST) From: Dave McCammon To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: IPFW 'keep state' & 'limit' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:44:52 -0000 --- fbsd_user wrote: > The FBSD 5.2 man IPFW does not say anything > different that the 4.9 > man IPFW. > Are you saying the man doc in 5.2 is wrong? > > 5.2 is using the ipfw2 code for IPFIREWALL I > believe. > > Documenting the fact that 'limit' performs the same > function as > 'keep state' in additional to 'limit' stated purpose > is very > important information. Also that 'limit' and 'keep > state' can not be > coded together is another very important piece > information that need > to be documented in the man IPFW data. > > Should this be submitted as an problem report? > > Snippits from IPFW(8) on FBSD 5.2 ---[begin snip]--- STATEFUL FIREWALL Stateful operation is a way for the firewall to dynamically create rules for specific flows when packets that match a given pattern are detected. Support for stateful operation comes through the check-state, keep-state and limit options of rules. ----[snip]----- Dynamic rules will be checked at the first check-state, keep-state or limit occurrence, and the action performed upon a match will be the same as in the parent rule. ---[end snip--- There is also an occurence farther down under the "EXAMPLES" area in the "DYNAMIC RULES" area which doesn't mention the limit option. ---[begin snip}--- Dynamic rules are checked when encountering the first check-state or keep-state rule. ---[end snip]---- Granted it doesn't say anything about them not working if used together but, since it does say that they both create dynamic rules, it looks to be intuitively implied that they wouldn't be used together. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 09:49:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A555816A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:49:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from razorbill.mail.pas.earthlink.net (razorbill.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.121.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE15343D46 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:49:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from 22-15.lctv-b4.cablelynx.com ([24.204.22.15] helo=yoda.datawok.com) by razorbill.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1Agp8p-00042Y-00; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:49:19 -0800 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: "Goodleaf, John M" , "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:49:20 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401141149.20570.algould@datawok.com> X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69564776905774d2ac4b83bfe44c2446e5ed2fed9807963ebcec350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Subject: Re: buildworld failure 4.9 Stable --> 5.2 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:49:27 -0000 On Wednesday 14 January 2004 11:30 am, Goodleaf, John M wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to upgrade a system from 4.9 (Stable) to 5.2 release. I get a > buildworld failure with aand error that reads like this: > > In file included from /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.c:62: > /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.h:41:24: sys/_types.h: No such file or directory > In file included from /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.c:62: > /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.h:49: error: syntax error before "size_t" > /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.h:49: warning: useless keyword or type name in > empty declaration > /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.h:49: warning: empty declaration > /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.h:54: error: syntax error before "ssize_t" > /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.h:54: warning: useless keyword or type name in > empty declaration > /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm.h:54: warning: empty declaration > > Any ideas how to fix this? > > Thanks, > John > > PS My make.conf file looks like this: > > MODULES_WITH_WORLD=true > USA_RESIDENT=YES > CFLAGS= -O -pipe > NOGAMES= true > NOINFO= true > NOFORTRAN= true > NO_LPR= true > KERNCONF=CLYDE > NO_SENDMAIL= true > COPTFLAGS= -O -pipe > CPUTYPE= pentium4 > CXXFLAGS+= -fmemoize-lookups -fsave-memoized > PERL_VER=5.8.1 > PERL_VERSION=5.8.1 > PERL_ARCH=mach > NOPERL=yo > NO_PERL=yo > NO_PERL_WRAPPER=yo A common piece of advice is to do clean installations (not updates) when upgrading from 4.* to 5.*. Best of luck, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 09:54:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9608216A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:54:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from web11503.mail.yahoo.com (web11503.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2984E43D69 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:54:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bjjbuckley@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040114175433.73435.qmail@web11503.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [62.17.145.97] by web11503.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:54:33 GMT Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:54:33 +0000 (GMT) From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Bryan=20JJ=20Buckley?= To: FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Why is a USB modem not a USB modem? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 17:54:34 -0000 Hi, How do I tell FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE to recognise my STMicroelectronics USB Communicator as a umodem, and not as a ugen? Yes, I do have umodem and ucom both loaded. I have scoured the umodem(4) and ucom(4) man pages (which are pretty short) as well as the usb(4) man page, ugen(4), usbd(4) and usbdevs(4). Actually, running usbdevs -v just confirmed that the FreeBSD had apparantly all the information it needed (vendor ID, product ID, device class, description, etc.) - but it is still not attaching the right driver! I've seen this question asked before, but never answered. Here's hoping... JJ ________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly..."Ping" your friends today! Download Messenger Now http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com/download/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 10:03:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D6216A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:03:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD37B43D2D for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:03:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from admin@sycos.co.uk) Received: from sycos.demon.co.uk ([158.152.248.21] helo=dpc27) by anchor-post-31.mail.demon.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1AgpMZ-0007Qh-0V; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:03:31 +0000 Message-ID: <007901c3dac8$b9252700$1c77fea9@dpc27> From: "Admin" To: Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:03:31 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0075_01C3DAC8.B8491EE0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: peter@sycos.co.uk Subject: FreeBSD Driver compilation problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:03:43 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0075_01C3DAC8.B8491EE0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable When I try to run /usr/share/examples/drivers/make_device_driver.sh to generate the skeleton driver, it stops due to compilation errors caused = by the rman.h file. The errors are logged into err_log file and are = attached as sy3b1.zip file. Would you please advise a.s.a.p why these errors are happening and how = they can be corrected? Regards Gurdial Chandra Sycos AES ------=_NextPart_000_0075_01C3DAC8.B8491EE0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 10:15:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DCD816A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:15:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from web14914.mail.yahoo.com (web14914.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.225.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9B1A43D46 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:15:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nirv199@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040114181549.67344.qmail@web14914.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.146.72.170] by web14914.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:15:49 PST Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:15:49 -0800 (PST) From: Paulo Roberto To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: imap-uw port problem on 5.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:15:50 -0000 Hi, building imap-uw with: WITHOUT_SSL=YES seems to have no effect. I keep getting "Login Disabled" messages thru syslog. I searched the net and found a lot of similar cases like this, but all the solutions I tried did not work. I had this port on a 4.7 machine and it did install perfectly. Any ideas? tia Paulo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 10:50:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A0616A4CF for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:50:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.seekingfire.com (coyote.seekingfire.com [24.72.10.212]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28FA843D5E for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:50:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tillman@seekingfire.com) Received: by mail.seekingfire.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 5FA18121; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:50:09 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:50:09 -0600 From: Tillman Hodgson To: FreeBSD-Questions Message-ID: <20040114185008.GX415@seekingfire.com> References: <20040114134255.GA59317@kumprang.or.id> <009201c3daad$31d89220$1100a8c0@dtg17> <20040114163043.GL415@seekingfire.com> <200401141827.30569.ajacoutot@lphp.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200401141827.30569.ajacoutot@lphp.org> X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . X-GPG-Key-ID: 828AFC7B X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5584 14BA C9EB 1524 0E68 F543 0F0A 7FBC 828A FC7B X-GPG-Key: http://www.seekingfire.com/gpg_key.asc X-Urban-Legend: There is lots of hidden information in headers User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: Re: Loading balancing with more than one ISP. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:50:12 -0000 On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 06:27:30PM +0100, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > On Wednesday 14 January 2004 17:30, Tillman Hodgson wrote: > > I'm a heavy Zebra (migrating to Quagga) user. Using dynamic routing is > > very handy, but it won't solve the problem of balancing load across two > > connections. > > Thanks for the feedback :) > > > So you can't round-robin between two default gateways. You /can/, > > however, send traffic for different destinations out of different links. > > For example, I send my nightly CVSup traffic and other automated > > downloads out of a regular ADSL link in order to prevent swamping my > > main link. > > What I'm hoping to do is find a way to route all paquets coming: > - from DMZ to internet, using NET connexion1 > - from LAN to internet, using NET connection2 > > To be more understandable, something like this: > route add from DMZ defaut em0 > route add from LAN defaut em1 > --> I know it is not a real command line, it's just to make things clearer. That's basically source-based routing, as opposed to the normal destination based routing. Normal routing says "Based on the fact that you want to go to network X, I'll send you to gateway Y". Source-based routing says "Based on IP address that you're coming from, I'll send to you to gateway Y". On FreeBSD, source-based routing is done with the IPFW 'fwd' command (or the IPFilter 'pass out quick on to ' syntax) rather that using the `route` command. I'm doing that myself (with IPFilter) and it works well. It's confusing to set up initially because you have to take into account the interaction between normal routing and firewall-based source routing. If you're also NAT'ing and using dynamic IPs understanding how it all can be made to work is an enlightening experience ;-) > > If your upstream providers support dynamic routing protocols, then you > > can get that destination information automatically. But that's not the > > same as load balancing, it's best-path selection. > > And if it doesn't ? Then you have to figure out and enter the best paths yourself as static routes. Pain in the butt and likely to drift from reality over time. For example, if my CVSup server of choice were to change it's IP address (which I have no control over and am not likely to be notified about), then my static route won't apply and my CVSup traffic, which I've so carefully ensured won't affect my main link, will start going over my main link. -T -- The tao that can be told is not the eternal Tao. The name that can be named is not the eternal Name. - Tao Te Ching From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 11:12:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C09E216A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:12:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.lphp.org (APastourelles-107-1-2-91.w193-251.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.52.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9257443D41 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:12:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) Received: from sta01 (sta01.lphp.local [192.168.0.3]) by mail.lphp.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0EJBrAi000840; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:11:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ajacoutot@lphp.org) From: Antoine Jacoutot To: Tillman Hodgson , FreeBSD-Questions Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 20:10:19 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <20040114134255.GA59317@kumprang.or.id> <200401141827.30569.ajacoutot@lphp.org> <20040114185008.GX415@seekingfire.com> In-Reply-To: <20040114185008.GX415@seekingfire.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401142010.19806.ajacoutot@lphp.org> Subject: Re: Loading balancing with more than one ISP. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:12:26 -0000 On Wednesday 14 January 2004 19:50, Tillman Hodgson wrote: > On FreeBSD, source-based routing is done with the IPFW 'fwd' command (or > the IPFilter 'pass out quick on to ' syntax) rather that > using the `route` command. I'm doing that myself (with IPFilter) and it > works well. It's confusing to set up initially because you have to take > into account the interaction between normal routing and firewall-based > source routing. If you're also NAT'ing and using dynamic IPs > understanding how it all can be made to work is an enlightening > experience ;-) Great :) This is fantastic, this is exactly what I need :) Now, I have to figure out out do to this for real using ipfilter. I have a 1 connexion with NAT+dyn IP and another one that's fixed. I'm impatient to test this. Thanks a lot ! Antoine From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 11:22:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C63716A4CF for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:22:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com (host-66-202-56-162.mil.choiceone.net [66.202.56.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A4543D66 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:22:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from MClark@Nemschoff.com) Received: by EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:27:13 -0600 Message-ID: From: Michael Clark To: "'freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG'" Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 13:27:12 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Subject: file: table is full | FreeBSD 5.1 p11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:22:23 -0000 I am getting this error on my FreeBSD machine. Its to the point it was the only thing I could read out of the dmesg without rebooting. I read something about increasing max users to prevent this, but I do not see that option in the kernel anymore... Any information would be appreciated! Please CC me as not member of list. file: table is full file: table is full Packages Currently Installed 3dm-1.10.0.011_1,1 3ware ATA RAID monitoring daemon and web server ImageMagick-5.5.7.11_1 Image processing tools LPRngTool-1.3.2 Configuration Tool for LPRng ORBit2-2.8.2 High-performance CORBA ORB with support for the C language Tee-3.4 An enhanced version of tee(1) XFree86-FontServer-4.3.0_1 XFree86-4 font server XFree86-NestServer-4.3.0_1 XFree86-4 nested X server XFree86-PrintServer-4.3.0 XFree86-4 print server XFree86-Server-4.3.0_8 XFree86-4 X server and related programs XFree86-VirtualFramebufferServer-4.3.0_1 XFree86-4 virtual framebuffer server XFree86-clients-4.3.0_2 XFree86-4 client programs and related files XFree86-documents-4.3.0 XFree86-4 documentation XFree86-font100dpi-4.3.0 XFree86-4 bitmap 100 dpi fonts XFree86-font75dpi-4.3.0 XFree86-4 bitmap 75 dpi fonts XFree86-fontCyrillic-4.3.0 XFree86-4 Cyrillic fonts XFree86-fontDefaultBitmaps-4.3.0 XFree86-4 default bitmap fonts XFree86-fontEncodings-4.3.0 XFree86-4 font encoding files XFree86-fontScalable-4.3.0 XFree86-4 scalable fonts XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_5 XFree86-4 libraries and headers XFree86-manuals-4.3.0 XFree86-4 man pages Xft-2.1.2 A client-sided font API for X applications a2ps-letter-4.13b_1 Formats an ascii file for printing on a postscript printer aaccli-1.0 Adaptec SCSI RAID administration tool abck-2.2 Manage intrusion attemps recorded in the system log acidlaunch-0.5 An application launcher with simple XML-based configuration amsn-0.83_1 MSN Messenger aterm-0.4.2 A color vt102 terminal emulator with transparency support atk-1.4.1_1 A GNOME accessibility toolkit (ATK) autoconf-2.13.000227_5 Automatically configure source code on many Un*x platforms autoconf-2.53_1 Automatically configure source code on many Un*x platforms automake-1.4.5_9 GNU Standards-compliant Makefile generator (legacy version bandwidthd-1.1.7 Tracks bandwidth usage by IP address bash-2.05b.007 The GNU Bourne Again Shell bison-1.75_1 A parser generator from FSF, (mostly) compatible with Yacc boxtools-0.65.0 Style tools for the blackbox family of window managers cdrdao-1.1.7_4 Record CD-R[W]s in disk-at-once mode cdrtools-2.0.3 Cdrecord, mkisofs and several other programs to record CD-R cups-base-1.1.19.0 The Common UNIX Printing System: headers, libs, & daemons curl-7.10.7 Non-interactive tool to get files from FTP, GOPHER, HTTP(S) cvsup-without-gui-16.1h General network file distribution system optimized for CVS docbook-sk-4.1.2 XML version of the DocBook DTD version controlled for Scrol docbook-xml-4.2_1 XML version of the DocBook DTD docbook-xsl-1.62.3 XSL DocBook stylesheets dsniff-2.3 Various sniffing utilities for penetration testing esound-0.2.32_1 A sound library for enlightenment package etherape-0.9.0_1 A graphical network traffic visualization tool for gnome ethereal-0.9.14 An X11/GTK network analyzer/capture tool ettercap-gnome-0.6.b,1 A network sniffer/interceptor/injector/logger for switched expat-1.95.6_1 XML 1.0 parser written in C ezm3-1.1 Easier, more portable Modula-3 distribution for building CV fluxconf-0.9.4 Fluxconf is a configuration program for the fluxbox window fluxter-0.1.0 Dekstop pager for the Fluxbox Slit fontconfig-2.2.0 An XML-based font configuration API for X Windows fping-2.4b2 Quickly ping N hosts w/o flooding the network freetype-1.3.1_2 A free and portable TrueType font rendering engine freetype2-2.1.4_1 A free and portable TrueType font rendering engine gconf2-2.4.0.1 A configuration database system for GNOME gd-2.0.15_1,1 A graphics library for fast creation of images gdk-pixbuf-0.22.0 A graphic library for GTK+ gettext-0.11.5_1 GNU gettext package gettext-0.12.1 GNU gettext package ghostscript-gnu-7.07_4 GNU Postscript interpreter glib-1.2.10_10 Some useful routines of C programming (previous stable vers glib-2.2.3 Some useful routines of C programming (current stable versi gmake-3.80 GNU version of 'make' utility gnome-icon-theme-1.0.9 A collection of icons for the GNOME 2 desktop gnomehier-1.0_10 An utility port, installing hierarchy of common GNOME direc gnomemimedata-2.4.0 A MIME and Application database for GNOME gnomevfs2-2.4.1_1 GNOME Virtual File System gnuplot-3.7.3_2 A command-driven interactive function plotting program gtk-1.2.10_10 Gimp Toolkit for X11 GUI (previous stable version) gtk-2.2.4_1 Gimp Toolkit for X11 GUI (current stable version) guile-1.6.4_2 GNU Ubiquitous Intelligent Language for Extension hdf-4.1r5 Hierarchical Data Format library (from NCSA) help2man-1.29 Automatically generating simple manual pages from program o hostsentry-0.02 A Login Anomaly Detector imake-4.3.0 Imake and other utilities from XFree86 imlib-1.9.14_1 A graphic library for enlightenment package imlib2-1.0.6_1 The next generation graphic library for enlightenment packa intltool-0.27.2 Xml internationalization support for GNOME, and others ipaudit-0.95 IP traffic summarizer ispell-3.2.06_3 An interactive spelling checker for multiple languages jasper-1.700.2 An implementation of the codec specified in the JPEG-2000 s jbigkit-1.5 Lossless compression for bi-level images such as scanned pa jpeg-6b_1 IJG's jpeg compression utilities lame-3.93.1 ISO code based fast MP3 encoder kit lcms-1.09,1 Light Color Management System -- a color management library libIDL-0.8.2 A library for creating trees of CORBA Interface Definition libao-esound-0.8.4_1 Portable audio output library libart_lgpl2-2.3.16 Library for high-performance 2D graphics libaudiofile-0.2.4 A sound library for SGI audio file libbonobo-2.4.1 A component and compound document system for GNOME2 libbonoboui-2.4.0 GUI frontend to the libbonobo component of GNOME 2 libdvdcss-1.2.8 Portable abstraction library for DVD decryption libdvdread-0.9.4 This is needed by ogle, which is a DVD player that supports libfpx-1.2.0.9 Library routines for working with Flashpix images libglade2-2.0.1_1 GNOME glade library libgnome-2.4.0 Libraries for GNOME, a GNU desktop environment libgnomecanvas-2.4.0 A graphics library for GNOME libgnomeui-2.4.0.1_1 Libraries for the GNOME GUI, a GNU desktop environment libiconv-1.8_2 A character set conversion library libltdl-1.5 System independent dlopen wrapper libmng-1.0.5_1 Multiple-image Network Graphics (MNG) reference library libmpeg2-0.3.1_1 A free library for decoding mpeg-2 and mpeg-1 video streams libnet-1.0.2a,1 A C library for creating IP packets libnet-devel-1.1.0 A C library for creating IP packets (development version) libnids-1.18 Network monitoring library with TCP/IP reassembly libogg-1.0_1,3 Ogg bitstream library libprelude-0.8.8 Prelude Network Intrusion Detection System librairies libtool-1.3.4_4 Generic shared library support script libtool-1.3.5_1 Generic shared library support script libtool-1.4.3_2 Generic shared library support script libungif-4.1.0b1_1 Tools and library routines for working with GIF images libvorbis-1.0_1,3 Audio compression codec library libwmf-0.2.8 Tools and library for converting Microsoft WMF (windows met libxml2-2.6.3 Xml parser library for GNOME libxslt-1.0.33 The XSLT C library for GNOME libxslt-1.1.1 The XSLT C library for GNOME linc-1.0.3 A library for writing networked servers & clients linux_base-7.1_4 The base set of packages needed in Linux mode logcheck-1.1.1_4 Auditing tool for system logs on Unix boxes lrzsz-0.12.20_1 Receive/Send files via X/Y/ZMODEM protocol. (unrestrictive lynx-2.8.4.1d A non-graphical, text-based World-Wide Web client m4-1.4_1 GNU m4 minicom-2.1 An MS-DOS Telix serial communication program "workalike" mkcmd-8.14 Command-line parser and manual page generator mkisofs-2.0.3 Create iso9660/Rock Ridge/Joliet filesystems mozilla-firebird-0.7_1 Web browser based on the browser portion of Mozilla mpd-3.15_1 Multi-link PPP daemon based on netgraph(4) mplayer-gtk-esound-0.92.0_3 High performance media player/encoder supporting many forma mplayer-skins-1.1.0 Skins for MPlayer's Graphical User Interface (GUI) msrc0-0.7 Meta source fake-out script for building ksb tools mysql-client-4.0.16 Multithreaded SQL database (client) mysql-server-4.0.16 Multithreaded SQL database (server) nasm-0.98.38,1 General-purpose multi-platform x86 assembler net-snmp-5.0.9 An extendable SNMP implementation nmap-3.48_1 Port scanning utility for large networks nspr-4.3_2 A platform-neutral API for system level and libc like funct ogmtools-1.1 Tools to extract from/get info about/create OGG media strea openldap-client-2.1.23 Open source LDAP client implementation p5-Authen-PAM-0.14 A Perl interface to the PAM library p5-DBD-mysql-2.9002 MySQL driver for the Perl5 Database Interface (DBI) p5-DBI-1.38 The perl5 Database Interface. Required for DBD::* modules p5-Event-0.87 A Generic Perl Event Loop p5-GdkPixbuf-0.7009 The Pixbuf module of Gtk-Perl p5-Gtk-0.7009 The base module of Gtk-Perl p5-Net-SSLeay-1.23 Perl5 interface to SSL p5-Storable-2.08 Persistency for perl data structures p5-XML-Parser-2.34 Perl extension interface to James Clark's XML parser, expat p5-XML-Writer-0.4.1 A simple Perl module for writing XML documents pango-1.2.5 An open-source framework for the layout and rendering of i1 pcre-4.4 Perl Compatible Regular Expressions library pdflib-5.0.2 A C library for dynamically generating PDF perl-5.6.1_13 Practical Extraction and Report Language pico-4.55 PIne's message COmposition editor pkgconfig-0.15.0 A utility used to retrieve information about installed libr png-1.2.5_2 Library for manipulating PNG images popt-1.6.4_1 A getopt(3) like library with a number of enhancements, fro poptop-1.1.4.b4_2 Windows 9x compatible PPTP (VPN) server portsentry-1.1 Port scan detection and active defense portupgrade-20030723 FreeBSD ports/packages administration and management tool s pptpclient-1.3.1 PPTP client for establishing a VPN link with an NT server prelude-nids-0.8.5 Prelude Network Intrusion Detection System sensor pstree-2.21 List processes as a tree py23-expat-2.3.2_2 Python interface to the Expat XML parser python-2.3.2 An interpreted object-oriented programming language qiv-1.8_1 Small, fast GDK/Imlib image viewer rar-3.20,1 File archiver (binary port) rc_subr-1.16 Common startup and shutdown subroutines used by scripts rdesktop-1.3.0 RDP client for Windows NT/2000/2003 Terminal Server ruby-1.6.8.2003.04.19 An object-oriented interpreted scripting language ruby-bdb1-0.2.1 Ruby interface to Berkeley DB revision 1.8x with full featu ruby-rdoc-0.9.0 Documentation from Ruby source files ruby-shim-ruby18-1.8.1.p2 A set of Ruby modules to provide Ruby 1.8 functionalities samba-2.2.8a A free SMB and CIFS client and server for UNIX scrollkeeper-0.3.12_2,1 An Open Document Cataloging Project sdocbook-xml-4.1.2.5_1 "Simplified" DocBook XML DTD startup-notification-0.5_1 Library that supports startup notification spec from freede tcl-8.3.5_2 Tool Command Language tcl-8.4.5,1 Tool Command Language tcllib-1.3 A collection of utility modules for Tcl tiff-3.6.0 Tools and library routines for working with TIFF images tightvnc-1.2.9 Enhanced version of VNC tk-8.3.5_2 Graphical toolkit for TCL tk-8.4.5,1 Graphical toolkit for TCL trafshow-3.1_3 Full screen visualization of network traffic transcode-0.6.10 A text-console utility for video stream processing unzip-5.50_2 List, test and extract compressed files in a ZIP archive vcdimager-0.7.14 "GNU VCDImager/VCDRip -- The GNU VideoCD Image Maker/Rippin vorbis-tools-1.0_4,3 Play, encode, and manage Ogg Vorbis files webmin-1.121_1 Web-based interface for system administration for Unix wget-1.8.2_5 Retrieve files from the Net via HTTP and FTP win32-codecs-2.0.90_1,1 Huge compilation of Win32 binary codecs, including MPEG-4(D wmbluecpu-0.4 A CPU monitoring dockapp wmmemfree-0.7 Memory and swap monitoring dockapp wmmemmon-1.0.0 Mem/Swap monitoring dockapp for WindowMaker wmtop-0.84 Windowmaker dock app to display top 3 CPU consuming process wmupmon-0.1.1a An uptime showing dockapp with a similar look to wmcpuload wrapper-1.0_3 Wrapper for XFree86-4 server xmlcatmgr-1.1 SGML/XML catalog manager zip-2.3_1 Create/update ZIP files compatible with pkzip ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p11 #0: Fri Dec 19 21:05:11 CST 2003 root@monitor.nemschoff.com:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/IPSEC Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc0676000. Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/acpi.ko" at 0xc06761cc. Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz Timecounter "TSC" frequency 601365398 Hz CPU: Intel Pentium III (601.37-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x681 Stepping = 1 Features=0x383f9ff real memory = 268419072 (255 MB) avail memory = 253726720 (241 MB) Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard pcibios: BIOS version 2.10 Using $PIR table, 8 entries at 0xc00f0e70 acpi0: power button is handled as a fixed feature programming model. Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0xe408-0xe40b on acpi0 acpi_cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xe4000000-0xe7ffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 4.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xb800-0xb80f at device 4.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 uhci0: port 0xb400-0xb41f irq 10 at device 4.2 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: at device 4.3 (no driver attached) fxp0: port 0xb000-0xb03f mem 0xe1800000-0xe181ffff,0xe2000000-0xe2000 fff irq 10 at device 9.0 on pci0 fxp0: Ethernet address miibus0: on fxp0 inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp1: port 0xa800-0xa83f mem 0xe0800000-0xe081ffff,0xe1000000-0xe1000 fff irq 11 at device 10.0 on pci0 fxp1: Ethernet address miibus1: on fxp1 inphy1: on miibus1 inphy1: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fdc0: port 0x3f7,0x3f2-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 ppc0 port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 sio0 port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 orm0: