From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 05:36:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C416516A4CE for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2004 05:36:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (newtrinity.zeist.de [217.24.217.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CE9F43D1F for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2004 05:36:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: from newtrinity.zeist.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i18DaMRv058284; Sun, 8 Feb 2004 14:36:22 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@newtrinity.zeist.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by newtrinity.zeist.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i18DaHlL058283; Sun, 8 Feb 2004 14:36:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 14:36:17 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: I LUNV JEBUS Message-ID: <20040208143617.A57845@newtrinity.zeist.de> References: <400FB0E3.6000703@lrs.eei.uni-erlangen.de> <20040207180408.D13727@grogged.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20040207180408.D13727@grogged.dyndns.org>; from matt@grogged.dyndns.org on Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 06:14:54PM -0600 X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.0.6; AVE 6.23.0.3; VDF 6.23.0.60 cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: syscons on U10 /w Creator X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 13:36:24 -0000 On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 06:14:54PM -0600, I LUNV JEBUS wrote: > > I'm not having a lot of luck playing with this problem. I have an ultra 2 > creator3d that sorta works with syscons (freezes on probing serial stuff). > Anyhow, I yanked the creator card out of the ultra 2, and compared the > chips to the board from my U10 clone. Big difference first: > > Ultra 2 card has "Sun" branded chip reading: > STP3100BGA > 100-4025-02 > L1A9708 > (some garbage lines below) > > The analog on the Ultra 10 creator card ("Sun" branded as well): > 100-5512-01 > L2A0791 > (garbage lines below) There are a lot of different Sun Creator models and revisions (/w and w/o "3D", form factor, chipset, ...). > > Another small difference: > Ultra 2 creator board has a Bt498khf220, The Ultra 10 creator board > analog uses a Conexant Bt498AKHF240 chip. These are the RAMDACs. IIRC, the difference between these revisions from the perspective of the driver is that the hardware cursor bits are inverted. > > Is anyone privey to the datasheets for any of these chips? Or have any > other bright ideas? > The XFree86 ffb driver is a good source of information on these (xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/drivers/sunffb). From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 04:38:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B1416A4CE; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 04:38:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from citadel.nobulus.com (citadel.nobulus.com [212.97.207.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71EB443D1F; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 04:38:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from iva@citadel.nobulus.com) Received: from citadel.nobulus.com (localhost.nobulus.com [127.0.0.1]) by citadel.nobulus.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i19Db5eq080338; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:37:05 GMT (envelope-from iva@citadel.nobulus.com) Received: (from iva@localhost) by citadel.nobulus.com (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i19Db5ef080337; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:37:05 GMT (envelope-from iva) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:37:05 +0000 From: Ilya Varlashkin To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20040209133705.GA80269@CITADEL.NOBULUS.COM> References: <200402070229.i172TCUe067188@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200402070229.i172TCUe067188@freefall.freebsd.org> cc: liddle@thphys.ox.ac.uk cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sparc64/62448: Terminal Type during install X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 12:38:17 -0000 On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 06:29:12PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Synopsis: Terminal Type during install > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: kris > State-Changed-When: Fri Feb 6 18:28:01 PST 2004 > State-Changed-Why: > It's documented in the release notes, and discussed extensively on the > mailing list, that installing via the system console is not yet supported. > Use a serial console instead for now. > Kris, is there copyright problem with termcap? After the installation of FreeBSD on my Ultra-10 I'd just copied definition from Solaris and normal console (not serial) works just fine. If Sun didn't copyright/patent their termcap could it just be incorporated into FreeBSD? By the way, file id appeared to be the same on Solaris and FreeBSD, but content is different. Kind regards, Ilya Varlashkin From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 06:22:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF9A16A4CF for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 06:22:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from fep01-svc.mail.telepac.pt (fep01-svc.mail.telepac.pt [194.65.5.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4410743D1F for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 06:22:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from j.silva@IEEE.org) Received: from jorgesilva.com ([213.13.196.163]) by fep01-svc.mail.telepac.ptESMTP <20040209142133.YNNY10806.fep01-svc.mail.telepac.pt@jorgesilva.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:21:33 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jorgesilva.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i19ELUHu017227; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:21:31 GMT Received: from mail.interbolsa.pt (mail.interbolsa.pt [62.48.164.150]) by 213.13.196.163 (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:21:29 +0000 Message-ID: <1076336489.402797693bd77@213.13.196.163> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:21:29 +0000 From: Jorge Silva To: Stephane Bortzmeyer References: <1076162207.4024ee9fba191@www.jorgesilva.com> <20040207140547.GA24123@nic.fr> In-Reply-To: <20040207140547.GA24123@nic.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 62.48.164.150 X-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0) cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD sparc, can't boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 14:22:50 -0000 That's what I thought... thank you, Stephane ! Is that any way to create a boot floppy ? Regards, Jorge Silva Quoting Stephane Bortzmeyer : > On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 01:56:47PM +0000, > Jorge Silva wrote > a message of 36 lines which said: > > > I'm trying to install FreeBSD 5.2R on an Ultra10 with 2 IDE disks. > > I installed the same version on the same machine (only one IDE disk) > yesterday and it worked. > > > When I try to boot from the "bootonly" CD ( with "boot cdrom" on the OB > prompt > > I used it also. Is it an ISO image that you downloaded and burned or a > CD someone gave you? > > > Can't read disk label. > > Can't open disk label package. > > Fast Data Access MMU Miss > > I'm almost sure that the CD is corrupted or the drive is dead. > > If the drive works fine with Solaris, I suggest to download an ISO > image, check it has been properly downloaded and burn it with utmost > precautions (slow speed, clean drive, etc). > From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 06:32:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6054416A4CE for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 06:32:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from maya40.nic.fr (maya40.nic.fr [192.134.4.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C970143D1F for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 06:32:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bortzmeyer@nic.fr) Received: from vespucci.nic.fr (postfix@vespucci.nic.fr [192.134.4.68]) by maya40.nic.fr (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id i19EWEYc542400; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:32:14 +0100 (CET) Received: by vespucci.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1055) id AEB331046D; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:32:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:32:14 +0100 From: Stephane Bortzmeyer To: Jorge Silva Message-ID: <20040209143214.GA29120@nic.fr> References: <1076162207.4024ee9fba191@www.jorgesilva.com> <20040207140547.GA24123@nic.fr> <1076336489.402797693bd77@213.13.196.163> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1076336489.402797693bd77@213.13.196.163> X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable X-Kernel: Linux 2.4.24-1-k7 i686 Organization: NIC France X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD sparc, can't boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 14:32:16 -0000 On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 02:21:29PM +0000, Jorge Silva wrote a message of 34 lines which said: > Is that any way to create a boot floppy ? I did not try but it is documented here: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/sparc64/5.2-RELEASE/INSTALL.{TXT,HTM} From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 06:59:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F288F16A4CE for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 06:59:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from fep01-svc.mail.telepac.pt (fep01-svc.mail.telepac.pt [194.65.5.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB8943D1D for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 06:59:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from j.silva@IEEE.org) Received: from jorgesilva.com ([213.13.196.163]) by fep01-svc.mail.telepac.ptESMTP <20040209145921.ZZDA10806.fep01-svc.mail.telepac.pt@jorgesilva.com>; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:59:21 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jorgesilva.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i19ExBHu017754; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:59:12 GMT Received: from mail.interbolsa.pt (mail.interbolsa.pt [62.48.164.150]) by 213.13.196.163 (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:59:11 +0000 Message-ID: <1076338751.4027a03f30077@213.13.196.163> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:59:11 +0000 From: Jorge Silva To: Stephane Bortzmeyer References: <1076162207.4024ee9fba191@www.jorgesilva.com> <20040207140547.GA24123@nic.fr> <1076336489.402797693bd77@213.13.196.163> <20040209143214.GA29120@nic.fr> In-Reply-To: <20040209143214.GA29120@nic.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 62.48.164.150 X-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.0) cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD sparc, can't boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 14:59:27 -0000 That section was removed from the instructions, and the boot.flp file, too... Regards, Jorge Silva Quoting Stephane Bortzmeyer : > On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 02:21:29PM +0000, > Jorge Silva wrote > a message of 34 lines which said: > > > Is that any way to create a boot floppy ? > > I did not try but it is documented here: > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/sparc64/5.2-RELEASE/INSTALL.{TXT,HTM} > From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 07:10:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D86E16A4CE for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 07:10:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from phantom.cris.net (phantom.cris.net [212.110.130.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F02643D1D for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 07:10:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ru@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: from phantom.cris.net (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i19FBFoh022961 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:11:15 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i19FBFbS022956 for sparc64@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:11:15 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:11:15 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: sparc64@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040209151115.GA22404@FreeBSD.org.ua> References: <200402091417.i19EH2pU029367@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200402091417.i19EH2pU029367@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/boot/sparc64 Makefile.inc src/sys/boot/sparc64/boot1 Makefile src/sys/boot/sparc64/loader Makefile X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:10:29 -0000 --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 06:17:02AM -0800, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > ru 2004/02/09 06:17:02 PST >=20 > FreeBSD src repository >=20 > Modified files: > sys/boot/sparc64/boot1 Makefile=20 > sys/boot/sparc64/loader Makefile=20 > Added files: > sys/boot/sparc64 Makefile.inc=20 > Log: > MFi386. > =20 > - Factor out common settings and put them in an upper level Makefile.in= c. > - Properly use PROG for real programs, not their products. > - Further reduce diffs to i386 versions. > =20 > Tested on: sparc64 (panther) > =20 > Revision Changes Path > 1.1 +5 -0 src/sys/boot/sparc64/Makefile.inc (new) > 1.9 +14 -17 src/sys/boot/sparc64/boot1/Makefile > 1.16 +9 -35 src/sys/boot/sparc64/loader/Makefile >=20 While here. Since (as opposed to other architectures) "loader" is the pure ELF binary, is there any reason not to _strip_ it? %%% Index: Makefile =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/boot/sparc64/loader/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.16 diff -u -r1.16 Makefile --- Makefile 9 Feb 2004 14:17:02 -0000 1.16 +++ Makefile 9 Feb 2004 15:07:58 -0000 @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ # $FreeBSD: src/sys/boot/sparc64/loader/Makefile,v 1.16 2004/02/09 14:17:0= 2 ru Exp $ =20 PROG=3D loader -STRIP=3D NEWVERSWHAT=3D "bootstrap loader" sparc64 INSTALLFLAGS=3D -b =20 %%% Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov FreeBSD committer ru@FreeBSD.org --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAJ6MTUkv4P6juNwoRAnBHAJ4iJZfhYumcIicNPs/GTEhV7SDzgQCff1w1 zTergka78lNs74b7bHF0nJI= =SpFH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 07:32:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4613616A4CE for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 07:32:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from maya20.nic.fr (maya20.nic.fr [192.134.4.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD96D43D2F for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 07:32:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bortzmeyer@nic.fr) Received: from vespucci.nic.fr (postfix@vespucci.nic.fr [192.134.4.68]) by maya20.nic.fr (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id i19FWZSI1482221; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:32:35 +0100 (CET) Received: by vespucci.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1055) id 2DB801046D; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:32:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:32:35 +0100 From: Stephane Bortzmeyer To: Jorge Silva Message-ID: <20040209153235.GA31150@nic.fr> References: <1076162207.4024ee9fba191@www.jorgesilva.com> <20040207140547.GA24123@nic.fr> <1076336489.402797693bd77@213.13.196.163> <20040209143214.GA29120@nic.fr> <1076338751.4027a03f30077@213.13.196.163> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1076338751.4027a03f30077@213.13.196.163> X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux testing/unstable X-Kernel: Linux 2.4.24-1-k7 i686 Organization: NIC France X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD sparc, can't boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 15:32:37 -0000 On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 02:59:11PM +0000, Jorge Silva wrote a message of 17 lines which said: > That section was removed from the instructions, and the boot.flp file, too... There is one in the 5.1 directory, it may work... From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 11:01:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBFC16A4CE for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:01:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B83543D1F for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:01:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i19J1dbv083154 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:01:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i19J1cEv083148 for freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:01:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:01:38 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200402091901.i19J1cEv083148@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 19:01:39 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/12/16] sparc64/60300sparc64 Constant kernel messages: calcru: negativ 1 problem total. Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/06/24] sparc64/53670sparc64 pthreads implementation on 5.1-Release sp o [2004/01/28] sparc64/62053sparc64 Using bridging on 5.2 Sparc64 causes imme 2 problems total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/02/03] sparc64/47845sparc64 4 second daily clock drift a [2003/10/10] sparc64/57856sparc64 sparc64: IDE Raid controller no detect di 2 problems total. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 09:48:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7D416A4CE; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:48:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5262543D1D; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:48:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i1AHmgTr011416; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:48:42 -0500 (EST) Received: (from kensmith@localhost) by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i1AHmg24011415; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:48:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:48:42 -0500 From: Ken Smith To: Ruslan Ermilov Message-ID: <20040210174842.GA10649@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <200402091417.i19EH2pU029367@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040209151115.GA22404@FreeBSD.org.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040209151115.GA22404@FreeBSD.org.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/boot/sparc64 Makefile.inc src/sys/boot/sparc64/boot1 Makefile src/sys/boot/sparc64/loader Makefile X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:48:43 -0000 On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 05:11:15PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > While here. Since (as opposed to other architectures) "loader" > is the pure ELF binary, is there any reason not to _strip_ it? > > %%% > Index: Makefile > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/boot/sparc64/loader/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.16 > diff -u -r1.16 Makefile > --- Makefile 9 Feb 2004 14:17:02 -0000 1.16 > +++ Makefile 9 Feb 2004 15:07:58 -0000 > @@ -1,7 +1,6 @@ > # $FreeBSD: src/sys/boot/sparc64/loader/Makefile,v 1.16 2004/02/09 14:17:02 ru Exp $ > > PROG= loader > -STRIP= > NEWVERSWHAT= "bootstrap loader" sparc64 > INSTALLFLAGS= -b > > %%% I don't know of any reason not to strip it, but I'm definitely not in a position to speak for sparc64@. It seems to work on my test machine (SunBlade 100): FreeBSD/sparc64 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.0 (root@bostic.dcsl.buffalo.edu, Tue Feb 10 12:42:22 EST 2004) bootpath="/pci@1f,0/ide@d/disk@0,0:a" Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf /boot/kernel/kernel data=0x372708+0x43528 syms=[0x8+0x56010+0x8+0x44045] bostic 1 % file /boot/loader /boot/loader: ELF 64-bit MSB executable, SPARC V9, version 1 (FreeBSD), statically linked, stripped bostic 2 % uname -a FreeBSD bostic.dcsl.buffalo.edu 5.2.1-RC FreeBSD 5.2.1-RC #0: Sun Feb 1 09:31:02 GMT 2004 root@bobbi.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC sparc64 bostic 3 % -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel | From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 20:05:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F81E16A4CE for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 20:05:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-106-71.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.106.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435C543D1D for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 20:05:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B31A666CC9; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 20:05:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 20:05:22 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Thomas Moestl Message-ID: <20040211040522.GA46616@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20040201105032.GA17856@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040201164950.GB713@timesink.dyndns.org> <20040205085409.GA12282@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040205143536.GA712@timesink.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040205143536.GA712@timesink.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: sparc64@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: "panic: trap: fast data access mmu miss" on 5.2-C X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 04:05:23 -0000 --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 03:35:36PM +0100, Thomas Moestl wrote: > On Thu, 2004/02/05 at 00:54:09 -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 05:49:50PM +0100, Thomas Moestl wrote: > > > Looks like the back trace ran off the end of the stack; > > > db_stack_trace_cmd() only handles the usual starting points of kernel > > > stacks (traps from userland), but not freshly forked processes (or > > > kernel threads). The attached patch should fix that by initializing > > > the fr_pc and fr_fp fields of the first frame to 0 in cpu_fork(). >=20 > Did you get a witness backtrace ending in fork_trampoline() since? Looks like this is good to go. Kris --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAKaoCWry0BWjoQKURAio4AJ93eaxrml0QTeeYKNz8/Bvc4FswtwCg+F/A mQ7hDeifgaFa2HYG0/3E7ko= =ltxi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 22:42:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A77A16A4CE for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:42:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-dark.research.att.com (mail-dark.research.att.com [192.20.225.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3480843D1D for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:42:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@research.att.com) Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (mail-green.research.att.com [135.207.30.103]) by mail-dark.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A74BFE817D for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:43:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0C6F3B4B for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:38:42 -0500 (EST) Received: (from fenner@localhost) by windsor.research.att.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.8.5) id i1D6gFf20688; Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:42:15 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200402130642.i1D6gFf20688@windsor.research.att.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII To: sparc64@freebsd.org References: <20040201105032.GA17856@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040201164950.GB713@timesink.dyndns.org> <20040205085409.GA12282@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040205143536.GA712@timesink.dyndns.org> <20040211040522.GA46616@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:42:14 -0800 From: Bill Fenner Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.5a/makemail 2.9d Subject: Re: "panic: trap: fast data access mmu miss" on 5.2-C X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 06:42:16 -0000 I just got this panic; unclear if it's related: #9 0x00000000c013fb5c in __panic ( file=0xc0357da8 "/usr/src/sys/sparc64/sparc64/trap.c", line=364, fmt=0xc0357e38 "trap: %s") at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:536 #10 0x00000000c02a5450 in trap (tf=0xe8ed4f30) at /usr/src/sys/sparc64/sparc64/trap.c:364 #11 0x00000000c02a0b64 in pmap_kenter (va=18446735278660185024, m=0x1) at /usr/src/sys/sparc64/sparc64/pmap.c:833 #12 0x00000000c02a0a98 in pmap_kenter (va=0, m=0xfffff8003e019638) at /usr/src/sys/sparc64/sparc64/pmap.c:812 #13 0x00000000c02a0dd8 in pmap_qenter (sva=0, m=0xe8ed5260, count=15) at /usr/src/sys/sparc64/sparc64/pmap.c:933 #14 0x00000000c02a1070 in pmap_pinit (pm=0xfffff800036ebe10) at /usr/src/sys/sparc64/sparc64/pmap.c:1022 #15 0x00000000c02752d0 in vmspace_alloc (min=18446735277674118672, max=8787503087616) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.h:247 #16 0x00000000c027843c in vmspace_fork (vm1=0xfffff8003f89a000) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:2361 #17 0x00000000c0273804 in vm_forkproc (td=0xfffff8002ea8cfc0, p2=0xfffff80014ccc2e0, td2=0xfffff80007fed440, flags=20) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_glue.c:627 #18 0x00000000c012b4ec in fork1 (td=0xfffff8002ea8cfc0, flags=20, pages=8192, procp=0xe8ed56a8) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:657 #19 0x00000000c012a610 in fork (td=0xfffff8002ea8cfc0, uap=0xe8ed58c0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:101 #20 0x00000000c02a5a14 in syscall (tf=0xe8ed5880) at /usr/src/sys/sparc64/sparc64/trap.c:587 (kgdb) p panicstr $1 = 0xc03a7148 "trap: fast data access mmu miss" I don't have the patch from a few days ago applied. Bill From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 12:12:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F214A16A4CE for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:12:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from dell1.bcrl.stcloudstate.edu (dell1.bcrl.stcloudstate.edu [199.17.59.167]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B65A43D1D for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:12:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from chall@bcrl.stcloudstate.edu) Received: from www.bcrl.stcloudstate.edu (mercury [199.17.59.51]) i1DKC0Z15477 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:12:02 -0600 Received: from 199.17.59.205 (SquirrelMail authenticated user chall) by bcrl.stcloudstate.edu with HTTP; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:39:56 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <51368.199.17.59.205.1076701196.squirrel@bcrl.stcloudstate.edu> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:39:56 -0600 (CST) From: "Chuck Hall" To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: Netra X1 network problem. X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:12:04 -0000 I"m having problems getting my Sun Netra-X1 to work on the network. I have installed FreeBSD 5.2R on the system, which does find the NICs. I can add IP addresses and a MAC address (have to add the MAC since it does not find it other wise). But it still can not directly ping or be directly pinged from machines on the same network. A broadcast ping does get the machine to respond. Any ideas on how to get this machine to work? Have Fun! Chuck Hall From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 19:53:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB7A16A4CE; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:53:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp4.server.rpi.edu (smtp4.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A97443D2F; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:53:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp4.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1E3r1HQ017982; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:53:01 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:53:00 -0500 To: sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) cc: ru@FreeBSD.ORG cc: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG cc: freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Back to the Future - 64-bit time_t on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 03:53:05 -0000 Well, I have done more typing and testing, and it looks like I can reliably upgrade a 32-bit time_t system to 64-bit time_t even for people who install from NFS-mounted partitions. I have also expanded the instructions for updating, and tried to make them more useful and informative. So there is now the writeup, and two useful scripts: http://people.freebsd.org/~gad/time-64/UPDATING.64BTT http://people.freebsd.org/~gad/time-64/installworld_oldk http://people.freebsd.org/~gad/time-64/installworld_newk The 'oldk' script is only needed for installing via NFS mounts. The 'newk' script is recommended for anyone doing this upgrade. Adventurous people are invited to try this for installs on any system, and let me know how it goes Thanks go to Greg Panula, who did do a bunch of testing of my previous script + writeup over NFS-mounted directories, and thus trashed a (spare) sparc64 system while finding out that they did not work very well for NFS... I need to polish up the writeup a little bit more, but I think the scripts are now in fine shape. I know these files are not perfect. I have done about a dozen successful upgrades with these scripts, and after each one I realized some way to improve the scripts or the writeup. So, I am sure other people will also find some room for improvement. However, if we want to make this change before 5.3 release, then we need to schedule the actual change sometime soon. I do feel that these now do a fairly good and complete job. Even though there's a bit more polishing I could do, I wanted to get these out tonight, so they'd be available for those developers who have a long (3-day) weekend where they might have some extra time for testing these files. There are other ways this could be approached, but one of my goals was to change nothing in the standard makefiles. We could install these files for a few weeks, let people use them to perform the upgrade, and then delete them. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 21:06:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F3216A4CE; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:06:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5860E43D1F; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:06:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1E56iOE098322; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:06:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i1E56eT6059817; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:06:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i1E56e5J059816; Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:06:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:06:40 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Garance A Drosihn Message-ID: <20040214050640.GA59791@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Back to the Future - 64-bit time_t on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 05:06:44 -0000 On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 10:53:00PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > Adventurous people are invited to try this for installs on any > system, and let me know how it goes [snip] > Even though there's a bit more polishing I could do, I wanted > to get these out tonight, so they'd be available for those > developers who have a long (3-day) weekend where they might > have some extra time for testing these files. Good call. I'll give it a shot this weekend. I have /usr/src over NFS, but /usr/obj locally... -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 21:38:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E89416A4CE for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 21:38:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from mighty.grot.org (66-117-150-96.web.lmi.net [66.117.150.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8912843D1F for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 21:38:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from aditya@grot.org) Received: by mighty.grot.org (Postfix, from userid 515) id 29AB95D12; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 05:38:18 +0000 (GMT) To: "Chuck Hall" References: <51368.199.17.59.205.1076701196.squirrel@bcrl.stcloudstate.edu> X-Archive: encrypt From: Aditya Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 00:38:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: <51368.199.17.59.205.1076701196.squirrel@bcrl.stcloudstate.edu> ("Chuck Hall"'s message of "Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:39:56 -0600 (CST)") Message-ID: Lines: 30 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp, i386--freebsd) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Netra X1 network problem. X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 05:38:18 -0000 Chuck, upgrading your machine from 5.2R to HEAD (from CVS) will give you patches that reliabily assign unique MAC addresses to your interfaces. I've found that it takes care of a lot of "wierdness" with the interfaces on an X1. Hope that helps, Adi > On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:39:56 -0600 (CST), "Chuck Hall" said: > I"m having problems getting my Sun Netra-X1 to work on the network. > I have installed FreeBSD 5.2R on the system, which does find the > NICs. I can add IP addresses and a MAC address (have to add the MAC > since it does not find it other wise). > But it still can not directly ping or be directly pinged from > machines on the same network. A broadcast ping does get the machine > to respond. > Any ideas on how to get this machine to work? > Have Fun! Chuck Hall > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 To > unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 22:00:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4500A16A4CE; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:00:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275F843D1D; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:00:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1F60sOE006477; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:00:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i1F60rcM062888; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:00:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i1F60nU7062887; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:00:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:00:47 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Garance A Drosihn Message-ID: <20040215060047.GA62840@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Back to the Future - 64-bit time_t on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 06:00:55 -0000 On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 10:53:00PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > Adventurous people are invited to try this for installs on any > system, and let me know how it goes No problems. It's actually very painless. The "mergemaster -p" is probably a bit too much, as well as the second mergemaster provided that the machine has been upgraded prior to starting the 64-bit time_t transition. Also, the first "shutdown -r" can probably be a reboot. In any case: good job! -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 23:07:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF2E16A4CE; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 23:07:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp4.server.rpi.edu (smtp4.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DE943D1F; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 23:07:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp4.server.rpi.edu (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i1F77RHQ031225; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 02:07:28 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040215060047.GA62840@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20040215060047.GA62840@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 02:07:26 -0500 To: Marcel Moolenaar From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Back to the Future - 64-bit time_t on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 07:07:29 -0000 At 10:00 PM -0800 2/14/04, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 10:53:00PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: >> >> Adventurous people are invited to try this for installs on any >> system, and let me know how it goes > >No problems. It's actually very painless. Good to hear. Thanks. >The "mergemaster -p" is probably a bit too much, as well as the >second mergemaster provided that the machine has been upgraded >prior to starting the 64-bit time_t transition. I wanted to keep the directions as "general" as possible, such that they gave the correct commands for almost any upgrade. I only did changes specific to this 64-bit time_t upgrade where I absolutely had to (mainly the 'installworld_oldk' script). >Also, the first "shutdown -r" can probably be a reboot. Hmm. Yeah, that would probably be a good idea. >In any case: good job! Thanks. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu