From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 20 05:41:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3625D16A4CE for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 05:41:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.eunet.yu (smtp2.eunet.yu [194.247.192.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43A343D64 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 05:41:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kolicz@eunet.yu) Received: from smtp2.EUnet.yu (root@localhost) by smtp2.eunet.yu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i5K5f0vh018441 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 07:41:00 +0200 Received: from kolic.net (P-2.46.EUnet.yu [213.240.2.46]) by smtp2.eunet.yu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5K5efnc018288 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 07:41:00 +0200 Received: by kolic.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 837664133; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 07:38:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 07:38:15 +0200 From: Zoran Kolic To: freebsd-stable Message-ID: <20040620053815.GA787@kolic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: perlcc problem! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 05:41:06 -0000 > #!/usr/local/bin/perl > > use strict; > >print "\nhello world\n"; Maybe this syntax: perlcc -o mini mini.pl This works on my box. And... No need to compile small scripts. ZK From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 20 08:40:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF14B16A4CE; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:40:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp13.eresmas.com (smtp13.eresmas.com [62.81.235.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 748FA43D1F; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:40:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@wanadoo.es) Received: from [192.168.108.58] (helo=mx08.eresmas.com) by smtp13.eresmas.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1BbxsM-0003DQ-00; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:40:30 +0200 Received: from [80.103.10.119] (helo=orion.animas.redesjm.local) by mx08.eresmas.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BbxsM-0002mK-Jd; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:40:31 +0200 Received: from orion.animas.redesjm.local (localhost.animas.redesjm.local [127.0.0.1])i5K8eXtt001632; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:40:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@orion.animas.redesjm.local) Received: (from freebsd@localhost)i5K8eXKX001631; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:40:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd) Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:40:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200406200840.i5K8eXKX001631@orion.animas.redesjm.local> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org From: Jose M Rodriguez X-send-pr-version: 3.113 X-GNATS-Notify: X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.1-beta; AVE 6.25.0.62; VDF 6.25.0.102 (host: orion.animas.redesjm.local) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: nork@freebsd.org Subject: libflashplayer.so segfaults under linuxpluginwrapper X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jose M Rodriguez List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:40:51 -0000 >Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: Jose M Rodriguez >Organization: Redes JM >Confidential: no >Synopsis: libflashplayer.so segfaults under linuxpluginwrapper >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: ports >Class: sw-bug >Release: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE i386 >Environment: System: FreeBSD orion.animas.redesjm.local 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #0: Sun Jun 20 09:35:49 CEST 2004 root@orion.animas.redesjm.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ORION i386 /etc/make.conf: CPUTYPE?= i586/mmx NO_CPU_CFLAGS= true NO_CPU_COPTFLAGS= true CFLAGS=-O2 -march=pentium -pipe COPTFLAGS=-O2 -march=pentium -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe relevant ports: XFree86-clients-4.3.0_8 XFree86-fontDefaultBitmaps-4.3.0 XFree86-fontEncodings-4.3.0 XFree86-fontScalable-4.3.0 XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_7 acroread-5.08 dri-4.3.0,1 fontconfig-2.2.2,1 freetype2-2.1.7_3 gsfonts-8.11_1 linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_1 linux_base-7.1_7 linuxpluginwrapper-20040310_1 mozilla-1.7.r3,2 xorg-server-6.7.0_5 >Description: Mozilla segfaults opening a flash site (signal 11). (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x29e1f2ab in FontString::FontString () from /usr/local/lib/linux-flashplugin6/libflashplayer.so >How-To-Repeat: I Know this is a far less than standard config, But the rest of the system looks great. This working until recently, with mozilla 1.6 and XFree86-4 server. I've no time to dig in till Aug or so and no real need of flash, but it maybe reproductible on others systems. >Fix: No fix to the moment. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 20 08:43:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DFF016A4CE; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:43:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp13.eresmas.com (smtp13.eresmas.com [62.81.235.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D9E43D48; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:43:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@wanadoo.es) Received: from [192.168.108.57] (helo=mx07.eresmas.com) by smtp13.eresmas.com with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 1Bbxux-00047o-00; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:43:11 +0200 Received: from [80.103.10.119] (helo=orion.animas.redesjm.local) by mx07.eresmas.com with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1Bbxux-0000UK-B5; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:43:11 +0200 Received: from orion.animas.redesjm.local (localhost.animas.redesjm.local [127.0.0.1])i5K8hDLI001692; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:43:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@orion.animas.redesjm.local) Received: (from freebsd@localhost)i5K8hDCj001691; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:43:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd) Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:43:13 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200406200843.i5K8hDCj001691@orion.animas.redesjm.local> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org From: Jose M Rodriguez X-send-pr-version: 3.113 X-GNATS-Notify: X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.1-beta; AVE 6.25.0.62; VDF 6.25.0.102 (host: orion.animas.redesjm.local) X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: nork@freebsd.org Subject: libflashplayer.so segfaults under linuxpluginwrapper X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jose M Rodriguez List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 08:43:17 -0000 >Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator: Jose M Rodriguez >Organization: Redes JM >Confidential: no >Synopsis: libflashplayer.so segfaults under linuxpluginwrapper >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Category: ports >Class: sw-bug >Release: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE i386 >Environment: System: FreeBSD orion.animas.redesjm.local 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #0: Sun Jun 20 09:35:49 CEST 2004 root@orion.animas.redesjm.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ORION i386 /etc/make.conf: CPUTYPE?= i586/mmx NO_CPU_CFLAGS= true NO_CPU_COPTFLAGS= true CFLAGS=-O2 -march=pentium -pipe COPTFLAGS=-O2 -march=pentium -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe relevant ports: XFree86-clients-4.3.0_8 XFree86-fontDefaultBitmaps-4.3.0 XFree86-fontEncodings-4.3.0 XFree86-fontScalable-4.3.0 XFree86-libraries-4.3.0_7 acroread-5.08 dri-4.3.0,1 fontconfig-2.2.2,1 freetype2-2.1.7_3 gsfonts-8.11_1 linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_1 linux_base-7.1_7 linuxpluginwrapper-20040310_1 mozilla-1.7.r3,2 xorg-server-6.7.0_5 >Description: Mozilla segfaults opening a flash site (signal 11). (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... (no debugging symbols found)...(no debugging symbols found)... Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x29e1f2ab in FontString::FontString () from /usr/local/lib/linux-flashplugin6/libflashplayer.so >How-To-Repeat: I Know this is a far less than standard config, But the rest of the system looks great. This working until recently, with mozilla 1.6 and XFree86-4 server. I've no time to dig in till Aug or so and no real need of flash, but it maybe reproductible on others systems. >Fix: No fix to the moment. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 20 12:36:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7776D16A4CE for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:36:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.jmn.net.id (ns2.jmn.net.id [202.169.224.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 37AAC43D48 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:36:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from say@id.or.id) Received: (qmail 30446 invoked by uid 512); 20 Jun 2004 19:35:58 +0700 Received: from say@id.or.id by mail.jmn.net.id by uid 504 with JMN-MailScanner-v7.6 2.60. ravlin: 8.4.2. h+bedv: 2.0.8-13. Clear:RC:1:. Processed in 4.648577 secs); 20 Jun 2004 12:35:58 -0000 X-JMN-MailScanner-Mail-From: say@id.or.id via mail.jmn.net.id X-JMN-MailScanner: v7.6 (Clear:RC:1:. Processed in 4.648577 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO Leptop) (202.169.230.241) by 0 with SMTP; 20 Jun 2004 19:35:53 +0700 Message-ID: <02b701c456c3$20f20580$7b00a8c0@Leptop> From: "Sayid Munawar" To: Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:35:53 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Subject: libtool problem or SMP problem or port problem or what? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 12:36:13 -0000 Hello, I have a weird problem on my stable freebsd. The system is an SMP FreeBSD with dual PIII 677. I searched many lists, but found no answer. The problem start when i tried to compile PHP with almost YES in options (included below), the error was: libtool: link: cannot find the library `' <<---------- the error begins here *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.3.7. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4. [root@elf php4]# Then when i tried to make clean, it displayed: [root@elf XFree86-4-libraries]# make clean "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.autotools.mk", line 2: USE_LIBTOOL deprecated: replace with USE_LIBTOOL_VER=... So.. i decided to use the USE_LIBTOOL_VER=15 in my /etc/make.conf. But when i try the "make clean" again.. the servers flooded with "make" process until max proc reached, then died.... they were more than 1240 make process !!! [root@elf XFree86-4-libraries]# make clean USE_LIBTOOL_VER=15 Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable <<--- the system started "hang" Cannot fork: Resource temporarily unavailable "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.autotools.mk", line 2: USE_LIBTOOL deprecated: replace with USE_LIBTOOL_VER=... here is the dmesg output: maxproc limit exceeded by uid 0, please see tuning(7) and login.conf(5). here is the "top" output: 1241 processes:2 running, 1239 sleeping CPU states: 27.1% user, 0.0% nice, 30.7% system, 0.9% interrupt, 41.3% idle Mem: 144M Active, 20M Inact, 75M Wired, 8924K Cache, 35M Buf, 656K Free Swap: 496M Total, 69M Used, 427M Free, 13% Inuse, 10M Out PID USERNAME PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU CPU COMMAND 65205 root 35 0 3348K 2184K CPU1 0 0:01 4.35% 3.52% top 70078 root 10 0 740K 604K wait 0 0:00 10.00% 0.49% make 69917 root 10 0 740K 604K wait 1 0:00 4.61% 0.44% make 69963 root 10 0 740K 604K wait 0 0:00 4.61% 0.44% make 69894 root 10 0 740K 604K wait 1 0:00 4.61% 0.44% make 69848 root 10 0 740K 604K wait 0 0:00 4.61% 0.44% make 70055 root 10 0 740K 604K wait 1 0:00 9.00% 0.44% make 69756 root 10 0 740K 604K wait 0 0:00 2.80% 0.39% make ... ... almost all is "make" process ... uname -a: FreeBSD elf 4.10-STABLE FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE #0: Thu Jun 17 08:28:46 GMT 2010 root@elf:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ELF1 i386 My Libtool was: [root@elf XFree86-4-libraries]# pkg_info | grep libtool libtool-1.3.5_2 Generic shared library support script (version 1.3) libtool-1.5.6 Generic shared library support script (version 1.5) Finally i was successfully built PHP but without those options ( using the default options ). I am now trying to find out what php compile options is initiated the "libtool" problem by compiling php many times with different php_options', it will take a lot of energy :( Can anyone know what is the "real" problem? Is the libtool problem, my SMP kernel problem, or php4 port problem, or is it my mistake to do something? Here is my kernel conf according SMP: options SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel options APIC_IO # Symmetric (APIC) I/O Here is my PHP OPTIONS that lead to the problem: WITH_BCMATH=ON WITH_BZIP2=ON WITH_CALENDAR=ON WITH_CDB=ON WITH_CRACK=ON WITH_CTYPE=ON WITH_CURL=ON WITH_DB4=ON WITH_DBASE=ON WITH_DBX=ON WITH_DIO=ON WITH_DOMXML=ON WITH_DOMXSLT=OFF WITH_EXIF=ON WITH_FILEPRO=ON WITH_FRIBIDI=ON WITH_FTP=ON WITH_GD=ON WITH_GDBM=ON WITH_GETTEXT=ON WITH_GMP=ON WITH_HYPERWAVE=ON WITH_ICONV=ON WITH_IMAP=ON WITH_INIFILE=ON WITH_INTERBASE=OFF WITH_MBSTRING=ON WITH_MCAL=ON WITH_MCVE=OFF WITH_MCRYPT=ON WITH_MHASH=ON WITH_MIME=ON WITH_MING=ON WITH_MNOGOSEARCH=ON WITH_MSSQL=OFF WITH_MYSQL=ON WITH_NCURSES=ON WITH_OPENLDAP=ON WITH_OPENSSL=ON WITH_ORACLE=ON WITH_OVERLOAD=ON WITH_PCNTL=ON WITH_PCRE=ON WITH_PDFLIB=ON WITH_POSIX=ON WITH_POSTGRESQL=ON WITH_PSPELL=ON WITH_READLINE=ON WITH_RECODE=OFF WITH_SESSION=ON WITH_SHMOP=ON WITH_SNMP=OFF WITH_SOCKETS=ON WITH_SYBASEDB=OFF WITH_SYBASECT=OFF WITH_SYSVMSG=ON WITH_SYSVSEM=ON WITH_SYSVSHM=ON WITH_TOKENIZER=ON WITH_UNIXODBC=ON WITH_WDDX=ON WITH_XML=ON WITH_XMLRPC=ON WITH_XSLT=ON WITH_YAZ=OFF WITH_YP=OFF WITH_ZIP=ON WITH_ZLIB=ON --- Sayid Munawar From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 21 05:16:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B702816A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 05:16:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp2.eunet.yu (smtp2.eunet.yu [194.247.192.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F9D43D54 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 05:16:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kolicz@eunet.yu) Received: from smtp2.EUnet.yu (root@localhost) by smtp2.eunet.yu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i5L5G1Kt027122 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:16:01 +0200 Received: from kolic.net (P-2.111.EUnet.yu [213.240.2.111]) by smtp2.eunet.yu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5L5Fxnc027031 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:16:00 +0200 Received: by kolic.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 200D24133; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:11:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:11:25 +0200 From: Zoran Kolic To: freebsd-stable Message-ID: <20040621051125.GA585@kolic.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: fetch problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 05:16:03 -0000 Yesterday morning I was stunned by the fact that I could not get mail from pop server via fetchmail. After little panic (that I was hacked) I realized I could with "mozilla". So, it's not to my isp. Error message in "maillog" says it don't find localhost. It is true. In "/etc/hosts" I put machine-name for 127.0.0.1. But, that worked for long time. Then simply stops. Fetchmail uses dy- namic rule in ipfw2 and initiates process, gets mail from server and delivers to port 25. And, there is yesterday's problem. I just add smtphost machine-name to rc-file. Works again, but... Why it stoped? Fetchmail version is 6.2.5. I've checked system and found nothing. No strange files, no newly opened ports, no new users. Cops and aide give nothing. It is dial-up machine, never more than 3-5 minutes. Stays mistery to me. There was another issue the same morning. Yahoo account doesn't respond properly anymore. I use fetchyahoo script to get the mail. Now, "bulk folder" cannot be emptied. Script fails and finishes with no mail in spool. I will try without "empty bulk" option. Yahoo is on FreeBSD also. Does it mean anything? (I hate cookies-javascript-IE-etc behaviour of most services. Don't ask did I try that way.) Has someone noticed something alike? Best regards ZK From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 21 07:02:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9229616A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:02:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ylpvm43.prodigy.net (ylpvm43-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441D543D5A for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:02:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-35.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.35])i5L71klM021259; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 03:01:49 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 224C952347; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:01:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:01:44 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Sayid Munawar Message-ID: <20040621070143.GA87493@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <02b701c456c3$20f20580$7b00a8c0@Leptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <02b701c456c3$20f20580$7b00a8c0@Leptop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libtool problem or SMP problem or port problem or what? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 07:02:14 -0000 --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 07:35:53PM +0700, Sayid Munawar wrote: > Then when i tried to make clean, it displayed: > [root@elf XFree86-4-libraries]# make clean > "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.autotools.mk", line 2: USE_LIBTOOL deprecated: replace > with USE_LIBTOOL_VER=... Looks like your ports collection is out of date or locally customized, that port doesn't use USE_LIBTOOL or USE_LIBTOOL_VER. > [root@elf XFree86-4-libraries]# make clean USE_LIBTOOL_VER=15 USE_* are not to be specified by the user, they're only for use within port makefiles. You discovered the consequence, I'll leave the reason for you to figure out as an instructive exercise about the ports collection :) Kris --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA1ofXWry0BWjoQKURAhktAKCgQKHMfeihR00ECWrt7uG9EJ82ogCgoK5X w8lTpQm+H7cqlsKe3x2KuR0= =Chm9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BXVAT5kNtrzKuDFl-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 21 13:48:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C42E16A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:48:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nat386.national-net.com (nat386.national-net.com [66.115.141.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1078243D62 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:48:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@nat386.national-net.com) Received: from root by nat386.national-net.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1BcP6Q-00069W-00 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:44:50 -0400 X-Mailer: Perl5 Mail::Internet v1.59 To: X-Scanner: exiscan *000000-000000-00*DW8g/tj3WqE* Sender: root From: postmaster@.FreeBSD.ORG Message-Id: Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:44:50 -0400 Subject: WARNING! Blocked mail [Hello] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:48:44 -0000 Your EMail with subject 'Hello', sent to the recipient(s) aitchb54@www.karupspc.com contains a file attachment of type '[pif]'. Our organization does not accept files of this type by email. The message has NOT been delivered to the recipients. If you have further questions, please contact the postmaster (mailto:postmaster@). -- Message generated by exiscan From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 21 14:08:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A23E16A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:08:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.reppep.com (www.reppep.com [66.92.104.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64D443D5A for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:08:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pepper@reppep.com) Received: from [129.85.219.160] (salt.rockefeller.edu [129.85.219.160]) by www.reppep.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53225FEE1; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:07:50 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: pepper@mail.reppep.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040621070143.GA87493@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <02b701c456c3$20f20580$7b00a8c0@Leptop> <20040621070143.GA87493@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:05:29 -0400 To: Kris Kennaway From: Chris Pepper Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" cc: Sayid Munawar cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libtool problem or SMP problem or port problem or what? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:08:26 -0000 At 12:01 AM -0700 2004/06/21, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > [root@elf XFree86-4-libraries]# make clean USE_LIBTOOL_VER=15 > >USE_* are not to be specified by the user, they're only for use within >port makefiles. You discovered the consequence, I'll leave the reason >for you to figure out as an instructive exercise about the ports >collection :) Hmm. This raises the question, then, of why a couple of my ports have recently told me to set something like USE_BASE_OPENSSL or USE_PORT_OPENSSL to install (as I recall, a vulnerability check was failing). This worked, although I had to remove an OpenSSL dependency in pkgdb -F later. Was there a better way? In this scenario, do I really have to install OpenSSL from ports to keep things clean? Should those messages be changed? Thx, Chris PS-This was on -CURRENT. -- Chris Pepper: Rockefeller University: From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 21 20:32:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 093BB16A4D0 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:32:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ylpvm15.prodigy.net (ylpvm15-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE6143D48 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:32:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-35.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.35])i5LKWX2M012464; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 16:32:33 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A3A8F51955; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:32:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:32:28 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Chris Pepper Message-ID: <20040621203228.GB99917@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <02b701c456c3$20f20580$7b00a8c0@Leptop> <20040621070143.GA87493@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Sayid Munawar cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: libtool problem or SMP problem or port problem or what? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:32:39 -0000 --pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 10:05:29AM -0400, Chris Pepper wrote: > At 12:01 AM -0700 2004/06/21, Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > > > [root@elf XFree86-4-libraries]# make clean USE_LIBTOOL_VER=3D15 > > > >USE_* are not to be specified by the user, they're only for use within > >port makefiles. You discovered the consequence, I'll leave the reason > >for you to figure out as an instructive exercise about the ports > >collection :) >=20 > Hmm. This raises the question, then, of why a couple of my=20 > ports have recently told me to set something like USE_BASE_OPENSSL or=20 > USE_PORT_OPENSSL to install (as I recall, a vulnerability check was=20 > failing). This worked, although I had to remove an OpenSSL dependency=20 > in pkgdb -F later. USE_* variables are not to be specified by the user. User control variables are WITH_* and WITHOUT_* (WITH_OPENSSL_(BASE|PORT) are probably what you were referring to here). Kris --pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA10XcWry0BWjoQKURAq/bAJ9mCD7XnurQr+SqkOSW+2aofx58uACfV1YA 8MqVdYsxiAretan6OU0M99Y= =MnuO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pvezYHf7grwyp3Bc-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 21 21:06:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADF016A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:06:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anduin.net (anduin.net [212.12.46.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9564043D41 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:06:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from mailnull by anduin.net with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34; FreeBSD) id 1BcVzG-000M41-7g for stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 23:06:04 +0200 Received: from [217.8.136.185] (helo=[192.168.1.10]) by anduin.net with esmtp (Exim 4.34; FreeBSD) id 1BcVzG-000M3y-02 for stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 23:05:54 +0200 Message-ID: <40D74D83.5050904@anduin.net> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 23:05:07 +0200 From: Eirik Oeverby User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.6 (X11/20040504) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on anduin.net X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=7.5 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Level: Subject: nullfs in 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:06:05 -0000 Hi, Since upgrading to 4.10-ish (cvsup), nullfs (mount_null) causes my jailing host to panic and reboot very frequently. I've been using nullfs for about a year now, up until and including 4.9 and beyond, and I have never had problems with it. It has been heavily used, among other things to mount the host ports tree into all jails (10+), etc. Anyone got any idea what's happening? Someone mentioned on -CURRENT that nullfs has been the victim of some pretty hefty bitrot lately, so perhaps that's the reason? In any case - in its current form it does not belong anywhere near a -STABLE release. Wbr, /Eirik From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 21 21:09:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4721116A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:09:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ylpvm43.prodigy.net (ylpvm43-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B75743D39 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:09:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-35.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.35])i5LL9nlM024379; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 17:09:49 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0DDC951955; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:09:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:09:48 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Eirik Oeverby Message-ID: <20040621210948.GA1043@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <40D74D83.5050904@anduin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40D74D83.5050904@anduin.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nullfs in 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:09:54 -0000 --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 11:05:07PM +0200, Eirik Oeverby wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Since upgrading to 4.10-ish (cvsup), nullfs (mount_null) causes my=20 > jailing host to panic and reboot very frequently. I've been using nullfs= =20 > for about a year now, up until and including 4.9 and beyond, and I have= =20 > never had problems with it. It has been heavily used, among other things= =20 > to mount the host ports tree into all jails (10+), etc. >=20 > Anyone got any idea what's happening? Someone mentioned on -CURRENT that= =20 > nullfs has been the victim of some pretty hefty bitrot lately, so=20 > perhaps that's the reason? In any case - in its current form it does not= =20 > belong anywhere near a -STABLE release. Which is precisely what the manpage tells you. Kris --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA106cWry0BWjoQKURAmEjAJ4vua3EJd4lrpMamuFeB2mlk+AYkACg5cH8 hp7+LyUYO1b0EFlURmqVyiM= =pgpu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 21 21:25:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910C816A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:25:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4AC43D2D for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:25:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DF5DDE6A38; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:25:28 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4015E6A11; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:25:28 -0300 (ADT) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:25:28 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Eirik Oeverby In-Reply-To: <40D74D83.5050904@anduin.net> Message-ID: <20040621182401.V925@ganymede.hub.org> References: <40D74D83.5050904@anduin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nullfs in 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:25:29 -0000 On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Eirik Oeverby wrote: > Hi, > > Since upgrading to 4.10-ish (cvsup), nullfs (mount_null) causes my jailing > host to panic and reboot very frequently. I've been using nullfs for about a > year now, up until and including 4.9 and beyond, and I have never had > problems with it. It has been heavily used, among other things to mount the > host ports tree into all jails (10+), etc. > > Anyone got any idea what's happening? Someone mentioned on -CURRENT that > nullfs has been the victim of some pretty hefty bitrot lately, so perhaps > that's the reason? In any case - in its current form it does not belong > anywhere near a -STABLE release. nullfs never has been particularly stable, as the man page indicates ... I drop'd using it awhile ago, in favor of using nfs, because of teh problems taht I was gettin g.. that said, if its a consistent panic/reboot, can you get a core dump from it? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 21 22:24:09 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889AD16A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 22:24:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from finetoon.tempdomainname.com (finetoon.tempdomainname.com [192.220.112.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E6F243D49 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 22:24:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roger@asphyxia.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (203.23.252.64.snet.net [64.252.23.203]) (authenticated bits=0)i5LMO7Me016855 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 16:24:08 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <40D76004.5000403@asphyxia.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:24:04 -0400 From: Roger Raymond User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040621 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Trouble compiling lang/php4 (4.3.7) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 22:24:09 -0000 Hello, I'm attempting to compile lang/php4 from a current ports collection. The port seems to compile mod_php4 without problems but fails when it gets to the php4-cli portion of the port. I have also been able to compile the www/mod_php4 but unable to compile the lang/php4-cli port. the configure options are as follows (I am using the /root/php4_options file to set these so I don't have to check them all the time) './configure' '--enable-versioning' '--enable-memory-limit' '--with-layout=GNU' '--with-zlib-dir=/usr' '--disable-all' '--with-regex=php' '--enable-bcmath' '--with-bz2=/usr' '--enable-calendar' '--with-cdb' '--with-crack=/usr/local' '--enable-ctype' '--with-curl=/usr/local' '--enable-dba' '--with-dom=/usr/local' '--with-dom-xslt=/usr/local' '--with-dom-exslt=/usr/local' '--enable-ftp' '--with-gd' '--enable-gd-native-ttf' '--with-freetype-dir=/usr/local' '--with-t1lib=/usr/local' '--with-jpeg-dir=/usr/local' '--with-png-dir=/usr/local' '--with-gdbm=/usr/local' '--with-gettext=/usr/local' '--with-iconv-dir=/usr/local' '--with-iconv=/usr/local' '--with-inifile' '--enable-mbstring' '--with-mcal=/usr/local' '--with-mcve=/usr/local' '--with-mcrypt=/usr/local' '--with-mhash=/usr/local' '--with-mime-magic=/usr/share/misc/magic.mime' '--with-ming=/usr/local' '--with-mnogosearch=/usr/local' '--with-mysql=/usr/local' '--with-ldap=/usr/local' '--with-openssl-dir=/usr/local' '--with-openssl=/usr/local' '--enable-overload' '--enable-pcntl' '--with-pcre-regex=yes' '--with-pdflib=/usr/local' '--enable-posix' '--with-pspell=/usr/local' '--with-readline' '--enable-session' '--enable-sockets' '--enable-sysvmsg' '--enable-sysvsem' '--enable-sysvshm' '--enable-tokenizer' '--with-unixODBC=/usr/local' '--enable-wddx' '--with-expat-dir=/usr/local' '--enable-xml' '--with-xmlrpc' '--enable-xslt' '--with-xslt-sablot=/usr/local' '--enable-yp' '--with-zip=/usr/local' '--with-zlib=yes' '--with-apxs2=/usr/local/sbin/apxs' '--with-imap=/usr/local' '--with-imap-ssl=/usr/local' '--with-ncurses=/usr' '--prefix=/usr/local' 'i386-portbld-freebsd4.9' The error that I am receiving is: libtool: link: cannot find the library `' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.3.7. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4. I'm going to presume there is something missing on the system, but I have been unable to determine exactly what it is. Has anyone else received this type of error? Is there a way for me to get more information as to exactly what library is missing. Thanks in advance, Roger From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 02:41:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A091116A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 02:41:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au (smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au [210.50.30.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 744D643D31 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 02:41:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au) Received: from robbins.dropbear.id.au (210.50.202.208) by smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au (7.0.028) id 40D65C360006C8DF; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:41:09 +1000 Received: by robbins.dropbear.id.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C257C41F5; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:44:27 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 12:44:27 +1000 From: Tim Robbins To: Eirik Oeverby Message-ID: <20040622024427.GA77653@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> References: <40D74D83.5050904@anduin.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40D74D83.5050904@anduin.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nullfs in 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 02:41:38 -0000 On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 11:05:07PM +0200, Eirik Oeverby wrote: > Hi, > > Since upgrading to 4.10-ish (cvsup), nullfs (mount_null) causes my > jailing host to panic and reboot very frequently. I've been using nullfs > for about a year now, up until and including 4.9 and beyond, and I have > never had problems with it. It has been heavily used, among other things > to mount the host ports tree into all jails (10+), etc. You have not included enough information; you should at least include a panic message and either say what you were doing at the time it crashed or steps to reproduce the problem when reporting bugs. > > Anyone got any idea what's happening? Someone mentioned on -CURRENT that > nullfs has been the victim of some pretty hefty bitrot lately, so > perhaps that's the reason? nullfs is in better shape in -CURRENT than it is in -STABLE. > In any case - in its current form it does not > belong anywhere near a -STABLE release. Please re-read the manual page, paying particular attention to the statement that the file system is not supported. Tim From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 03:08:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A007716A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 03:08:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4483643D45 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 03:08:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5M36YIU025989; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:06:35 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 21:06:37 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20040621.210637.122769519.imp@bsdimp.com> To: dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <6CDBFD00-BFF1-11D8-AF71-000A95B96FF8@ee.ryerson.ca> References: <40CFFAF8.00000C.10717@colgate.yandex.ru> <6CDBFD00-BFF1-11D8-AF71-000A95B96FF8@ee.ryerson.ca> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NTPD and SecureLevel X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 03:08:56 -0000 In message: <6CDBFD00-BFF1-11D8-AF71-000A95B96FF8@ee.ryerson.ca> David Magda writes: : : On Jun 16, 2004, at 03:47, Pavel M. Rebrov wrote: : : > I've installed and configured ntpd daemon and was wondering if it : > going to work with SecureLevel higher than 1. SecureLevel 2 forbids : > changing the system date and, therefore, ntpdate and rdate won't work. : : Have ntpdate run before hand to get the time with in a close amount of : the 'real' time. There should be an rc.conf item for ntpdate. : : ntpd(8) doesn't actually change the time by making it 'jump' to the : correct time; it slows down or speeds up the rate at which the timer : runs at. only if you run it with -x, otherwise it will set the time if it is off by more than 128ms. -x Normally, the time is slewed if the offset is less than the step threshold, which is 128 ms by default, and stepped if above the threshold. This option forces the time to be slewed in all cases. If the step threshold is set to zero, all offsets are stepped, regardless of value and regardless of the -x option. In general, this is not a good idea, as it bypasses the clock state machine which is designed to cope with large time and frequency errors Note: Since the slew rate is limited to 0.5 ms/s, each second of adjustment requires an amortization interval of 2000 s. Thus, an adjustment of many seconds can take hours or days to amortize. This option can be used with the -q option. Warner From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 04:27:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A1516A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 04:27:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.jmn.net.id (ns2.jmn.net.id [202.169.224.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2989E43D31 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 04:27:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from say@id.or.id) Received: (qmail 28639 invoked by uid 512); 22 Jun 2004 11:27:36 +0700 Received: from say@id.or.id by mail.jmn.net.id by uid 504 with JMN-MailScanner-v7.6 2.60. ravlin: 8.4.2. h+bedv: 2.0.8-13. Clear:RC:1:. Processed in 3.49269 secs); 22 Jun 2004 04:27:36 -0000 X-JMN-MailScanner-Mail-From: say@id.or.id via mail.jmn.net.id X-JMN-MailScanner: v7.6 (Clear:RC:1:. Processed in 3.49269 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO Leptop) (202.169.230.241) by 0 with SMTP; 22 Jun 2004 11:27:33 +0700 Message-ID: <006401c45811$3d9e2840$7b00a8c0@Leptop> From: "Sayid Munawar" To: References: <40D76004.5000403@asphyxia.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:27:34 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Subject: Re: Trouble compiling lang/php4 (4.3.7) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 04:27:51 -0000 Yes > Hello, > > I'm attempting to compile lang/php4 from a current ports collection. > The port seems to compile mod_php4 without problems but fails when it > gets to the php4-cli portion of the port. I have also been able to > compile the www/mod_php4 but unable to compile the lang/php4-cli port. > > Yes... i received the same error and i posted here too with the subject: libtool problem or SMP problem or port problem or what? I have tried to cvsup my ports collection yesterday, but the problem persist. I think one of the php's feature (WITH_ ) is leading to this problem. but i don't know stil. PHP compiled OK with default WITH_ options > the configure options are as follows (I am using the /root/php4_options > file to set these so I don't have to check them all the time) > > './configure' '--enable-versioning' '--enable-memory-limit' > '--with-layout=GNU' '--with-zlib-dir=/usr' '--disable-all' > '--with-regex=php' '--enable-bcmath' '--with-bz2=/usr' > '--enable-calendar' '--with-cdb' '--with-crack=/usr/local' > '--enable-ctype' '--with-curl=/usr/local' '--enable-dba' > '--with-dom=/usr/local' '--with-dom-xslt=/usr/local' > '--with-dom-exslt=/usr/local' '--enable-ftp' '--with-gd' > '--enable-gd-native-ttf' '--with-freetype-dir=/usr/local' > '--with-t1lib=/usr/local' '--with-jpeg-dir=/usr/local' > '--with-png-dir=/usr/local' '--with-gdbm=/usr/local' > '--with-gettext=/usr/local' '--with-iconv-dir=/usr/local' > '--with-iconv=/usr/local' '--with-inifile' '--enable-mbstring' > '--with-mcal=/usr/local' '--with-mcve=/usr/local' > '--with-mcrypt=/usr/local' '--with-mhash=/usr/local' > '--with-mime-magic=/usr/share/misc/magic.mime' '--with-ming=/usr/local' > '--with-mnogosearch=/usr/local' '--with-mysql=/usr/local' > '--with-ldap=/usr/local' '--with-openssl-dir=/usr/local' > '--with-openssl=/usr/local' '--enable-overload' '--enable-pcntl' > '--with-pcre-regex=yes' '--with-pdflib=/usr/local' '--enable-posix' > '--with-pspell=/usr/local' '--with-readline' '--enable-session' > '--enable-sockets' '--enable-sysvmsg' '--enable-sysvsem' > '--enable-sysvshm' '--enable-tokenizer' '--with-unixODBC=/usr/local' > '--enable-wddx' '--with-expat-dir=/usr/local' '--enable-xml' > '--with-xmlrpc' '--enable-xslt' '--with-xslt-sablot=/usr/local' > '--enable-yp' '--with-zip=/usr/local' '--with-zlib=yes' > '--with-apxs2=/usr/local/sbin/apxs' '--with-imap=/usr/local' > '--with-imap-ssl=/usr/local' '--with-ncurses=/usr' '--prefix=/usr/local' > 'i386-portbld-freebsd4.9' > > The error that I am receiving is: > > libtool: link: cannot find the library `' > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.3.7. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/lang/php4. > > > I'm going to presume there is something missing on the system, but I > have been unable to determine exactly what it is. Has anyone else > received this type of error? Is there a way for me to get more > information as to exactly what library is missing. > > Thanks in advance, > Roger > > > --- Sayid Munawar From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 06:51:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B91F16A4CE; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 06:51:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from david.siemens.de (david.siemens.de [192.35.17.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6398043D46; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 06:51:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre.albsmeier@siemens.com) Received: from mail3.siemens.de (mail3.siemens.de [139.25.208.14]) by david.siemens.de (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i5M6pEY07096; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 08:51:14 +0200 (MEST) Received: from mars.cert.siemens.com (ust.mchp.siemens.de [139.23.201.17]) by mail3.siemens.de (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i5M6pDl13382; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 08:51:14 +0200 (MEST) Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (curry.mchp.siemens.de [139.25.42.7]) mail/cert.mc.pre,v 1.61 2004/06/20 16:46:46 mailadm Exp $) with ESMTP id i5M6pCvB065074; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 08:51:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i5M6pCuJ093989; Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 08:51:11 +0200 From: Andre Albsmeier To: Stephen McKay Message-ID: <20040622065111.GA25252@curry.mchp.siemens.de> References: <200404181438.i3IEclNf010673@dungeon.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200404181438.i3IEclNf010673@dungeon.home> X-Echelon: enigma, KGB, smuggle, NORAD, Privacy X-Advice: Drop that crappy M$-Outlook, I'm tired of your viruses! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: Peter Edwards cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Should I merge fix for PR#64091 (NFS data corruption)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 06:51:29 -0000 On Mon, 19-Apr-2004 at 00:38:47 +1000, Stephen McKay wrote: > Hi all! > > This one only got fixed recently in -current, and I've only given it > a few hours of heavy testing, but the fix for PR#64091 looks to work > just as well on -stable, and I'd like to merge it. Yes, please. I have been running the patch on -STABLE for a while now and haven't seen any bad effects so far. -Andre > > The test programs in the PR provoke the bug in no more than a couple > of minutes in my tests (4.10-beta client, 4.9-release server). With > the attached patch (taken nearly literally from -current), it's been > happy for about 8 hours now. > > I appreciate that nobody wants NFS destabilised so close to the (probably) > last ever 4.x release, so I'd like people to try to poke holes in this > before I pester re@ for permission to merge. > > Give the test programs in http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=64091 > a go on a 4.10-beta client, then try it with the attached patch. > > I suppose I'm particularly looking for anything that gets worse after the > patch, but any result good or bad is of interest. In my tests, it fixes > the problem and doesn't noticeably increase network traffic or cause any > other problems. I'd just like to be sure. :-) > > Stephen. > > PS NWANTED (in nfsnode.h) is totally bogus. Luckily it is only used > in commented out code. Should really be cleaned up though. > > ------8<------ ------8<------ ------8<------ ------8<------ > Index: nfs_bio.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/nfs/Attic/nfs_bio.c,v > retrieving revision 1.83.2.4 > diff -u -r1.83.2.4 nfs_bio.c > --- nfs_bio.c 29 Dec 2002 18:19:53 -0000 1.83.2.4 > +++ nfs_bio.c 18 Apr 2004 11:50:03 -0000 > @@ -401,13 +401,15 @@ > error = VOP_GETATTR(vp, &vattr, cred, p); > if (error) > return (error); > - if (np->n_mtime != vattr.va_mtime.tv_sec) { > + if ((np->n_flag & NSIZECHANGED) > + || np->n_mtime != vattr.va_mtime.tv_sec) { > if (vp->v_type == VDIR) > nfs_invaldir(vp); > error = nfs_vinvalbuf(vp, V_SAVE, cred, p, 1); > if (error) > return (error); > np->n_mtime = vattr.va_mtime.tv_sec; > + np->n_flag &= ~NSIZECHANGED; > } > } > } > Index: nfs_subs.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/nfs/Attic/nfs_subs.c,v > retrieving revision 1.90.2.2 > diff -u -r1.90.2.2 nfs_subs.c > --- nfs_subs.c 25 Oct 2001 19:18:53 -0000 1.90.2.2 > +++ nfs_subs.c 18 Apr 2004 11:50:03 -0000 > @@ -1335,12 +1335,19 @@ > vap->va_size = np->n_size; > np->n_attrstamp = 0; > } else if (np->n_flag & NMODIFIED) { > - if (vap->va_size < np->n_size) > + /* > + * We've modified the file: Use the larger > + * of our size, and the server's size. > + */ > + if (vap->va_size < np->n_size) { > vap->va_size = np->n_size; > - else > + } else { > np->n_size = vap->va_size; > + np->n_flag |= NSIZECHANGED; > + } > } else { > np->n_size = vap->va_size; > + np->n_flag |= NSIZECHANGED; > } > vnode_pager_setsize(vp, np->n_size); > } else { > Index: nfsnode.h > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/sys/nfs/Attic/nfsnode.h,v > retrieving revision 1.32.2.1 > diff -u -r1.32.2.1 nfsnode.h > --- nfsnode.h 26 Jun 2001 04:20:11 -0000 1.32.2.1 > +++ nfsnode.h 18 Apr 2004 11:50:03 -0000 > @@ -144,6 +144,7 @@ > #define NCHG 0x0400 /* Special file times changed */ > #define NLOCKED 0x0800 /* node is locked */ > #define NWANTED 0x0100 /* someone wants to lock */ > +#define NSIZECHANGED 0x2000 /* File size has changed: need cache inval */ > > /* > * Convert between nfsnode pointers and vnode pointers > ------8<------ ------8<------ ------8<------ ------8<------ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 13:09:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCD116A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:09:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from natnoddy.rzone.de (natnoddy.rzone.de [81.169.145.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D4A143D55 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:09:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from hoppel.local (port-212-202-38-230.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.38.230]) by post.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5MD95Qn021990 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:09:06 +0200 (MEST) Received: from alpha (alpha.local [192.168.1.2]) by hoppel.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0A31A3 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:09:01 +0200 (CEST) From: "Bjoern Koenig" To: Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:09:18 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcRYUP5I45w98ylGRBGNlcQupfs/OgAB78SQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 In-Reply-To: <20040622120059.1F96F16A4F0@hub.freebsd.org> Message-Id: <20040622130901.7F0A31A3@hoppel.local> Subject: Re: nullfs in 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:09:28 -0000 Hello, first of all: THIS FILESYSTEM TYPE IS NOT YET FULLY SUPPORTED (READ: IT DOESN'T WORK) AND USING IT MAY, IN FACT, DESTROY DATA ON YOUR SYSTEM. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. BEWARE OF DOG. SLIPPERY WHEN WET. My experience: I had much less problems with unionfs -b, even with FreeBSD 4.10, to mount for example /usr/ports into a jail temporarily. But for everything else you should never use it. Bjoern From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 13:23:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A4016A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:23:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from finetoon.tempdomainname.com (finetoon.tempdomainname.com [192.220.112.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B29A43D58 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:23:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roger.raymond@asphyxia.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (203.23.252.64.snet.net [64.252.23.203]) (authenticated bits=0)i5MDLnMU055947 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 07:21:50 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <40D8326F.2060309@asphyxia.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 09:21:51 -0400 From: Roger Raymond User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040621 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <40D76004.5000403@asphyxia.com> <006401c45811$3d9e2840$7b00a8c0@Leptop> In-Reply-To: <006401c45811$3d9e2840$7b00a8c0@Leptop> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Trouble compiling lang/php4 (4.3.7) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 13:23:12 -0000 Sayid Munawar wrote: > Yes... i received the same error and i posted here too with the subject: > > libtool problem or SMP problem or port problem or what? > > I have tried to cvsup my ports collection yesterday, but the problem > persist. I think one of the php's feature (WITH_ ) is leading to this > problem. but i don't know stil. PHP compiled OK with default WITH_ options I saw that post after I had written mine. The responses were not all that helpful IMO. I too was able to compile php4-cli with the 'default' set of options, so i guess it's now a guessing game and I'll have to turn off each option i have on one at a time and try to build the port until I get it to compile successfully. Will post my findings should I stumble upon them :) --Roger From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 14:52:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99AA16A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 14:52:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from finetoon.tempdomainname.com (finetoon.tempdomainname.com [192.220.112.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC98643D2F for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 14:52:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roger.raymond@asphyxia.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (203.23.252.64.snet.net [64.252.23.203]) (authenticated bits=0)i5MEpwPh011189 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 08:51:59 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: <40D84790.6050704@asphyxia.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:52:00 -0400 From: Roger Raymond User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040621 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <40D76004.5000403@asphyxia.com> <006401c45811$3d9e2840$7b00a8c0@Leptop> <40D8326F.2060309@asphyxia.com> In-Reply-To: <40D8326F.2060309@asphyxia.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.84.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Trouble compiling lang/php4 (4.3.7) (solved - maybe) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 14:52:30 -0000 Well... It appears that the mnoGoSearch option for the php-cli is not working correctly. I recompiled the mnogosearch port then tried to compile php4 WITH_MNOGOSEARCH=ON and it resulted in the libtool link error described in previous posts. the lang/php4 port appears to compile successfully with all the other options. Would this be an issue with php or the mnogosearch port? Here's my php4_options file: WITH_BCMATH=ON WITH_BZIP2=ON WITH_CALENDAR=ON WITH_CDB=ON WITH_CRACK=ON WITH_CTYPE=ON WITH_CURL=ON WITH_DB4=OFF WITH_DBASE=OFF WITH_DBX=OFF WITH_DIO=OFF WITH_DOMXML=ON WITH_DOMXSLT=ON WITH_EXIF=OFF WITH_FILEPRO=OFF WITH_FRIBIDI=OFF WITH_FTP=ON WITH_GD=ON WITH_GDBM=ON WITH_GETTEXT=ON WITH_GMP=OFF WITH_HYPERWAVE=OFF WITH_ICONV=ON WITH_IMAP=ON WITH_INIFILE=ON WITH_INTERBASE=OFF WITH_MBSTRING=ON WITH_MCAL=ON WITH_MCVE=ON WITH_MCRYPT=ON WITH_MHASH=ON WITH_MIME=ON WITH_MING=ON WITH_MNOGOSEARCH=OFF WITH_MSSQL=OFF WITH_MYSQL=ON WITH_NCURSES=ON WITH_OPENLDAP=ON WITH_OPENSSL=ON WITH_ORACLE=OFF WITH_OVERLOAD=ON WITH_PCNTL=ON WITH_PCRE=ON WITH_PDFLIB=ON WITH_POSIX=ON WITH_POSTGRESQL=OFF WITH_PSPELL=ON WITH_READLINE=ON WITH_RECODE=OFF WITH_SESSION=ON WITH_SHMOP=OFF WITH_SNMP=ON WITH_SOCKETS=ON WITH_SYBASEDB=OFF WITH_SYBASECT=OFF WITH_SYSVMSG=ON WITH_SYSVSEM=ON WITH_SYSVSHM=ON WITH_TOKENIZER=ON WITH_UNIXODBC=ON WITH_WDDX=ON WITH_XML=ON WITH_XMLRPC=ON WITH_XSLT=ON WITH_YAZ=OFF WITH_YP=ON WITH_ZIP=ON WITH_ZLIB=ON --Roger Roger Raymond wrote: > > > Sayid Munawar wrote: > >> Yes... i received the same error and i posted here too with the subject: >> >> libtool problem or SMP problem or port problem or what? >> >> I have tried to cvsup my ports collection yesterday, but the problem >> persist. I think one of the php's feature (WITH_ ) is leading to this >> problem. but i don't know stil. PHP compiled OK with default WITH_ >> options > > > I saw that post after I had written mine. The responses were not all > that helpful IMO. I too was able to compile php4-cli with the 'default' > set of options, so i guess it's now a guessing game and I'll have to > turn off each option i have on one at a time and try to build the port > until I get it to compile successfully. > > Will post my findings should I stumble upon them :) > > --Roger > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 14:55:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B084016A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 14:55:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www.reppep.com (www.reppep.com [66.92.104.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D64643D2F for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 14:55:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pepper@reppep.com) Received: from [129.85.219.160] (salt.rockefeller.edu [129.85.219.160]) by www.reppep.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE40FEA4; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:55:27 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: pepper@mail.reppep.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20040621203228.GB99917@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <02b701c456c3$20f20580$7b00a8c0@Leptop> <20040621070143.GA87493@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040621203228.GB99917@xor.obsecurity.org> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:53:50 -0400 To: Kris Kennaway From: Chris Pepper Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" cc: Sayid Munawar cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: libtool problem or SMP problem or port problem or what? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 14:55:28 -0000 At 1:32 PM -0700 2004/06/21, Kris Kennaway wrote: >On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 10:05:29AM -0400, Chris Pepper wrote: >> At 12:01 AM -0700 2004/06/21, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> >> > > [root@elf XFree86-4-libraries]# make clean USE_LIBTOOL_VER=15 >> > >> >USE_* are not to be specified by the user, they're only for use within >> >port makefiles. You discovered the consequence, I'll leave the reason >> >for you to figure out as an instructive exercise about the ports >> >collection :) >> >> Hmm. This raises the question, then, of why a couple of my >> ports have recently told me to set something like USE_BASE_OPENSSL or >> USE_PORT_OPENSSL to install (as I recall, a vulnerability check was >> failing). This worked, although I had to remove an OpenSSL dependency >> in pkgdb -F later. > >USE_* variables are not to be specified by the user. User control >variables are WITH_* and WITHOUT_* (WITH_OPENSSL_(BASE|PORT) are >probably what you were referring to here). Kris, You are right. Thanks for the clarification. Chris -- Chris Pepper: Rockefeller University: From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 15:25:05 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EAD516A4CF for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:25:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2746F43D2D for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:25:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7EECCE9472; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:57:46 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DDC2E9471; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:57:46 -0300 (ADT) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:57:46 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Bjoern Koenig In-Reply-To: <20040622130901.7F0A31A3@hoppel.local> Message-ID: <20040622104637.J845@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20040622130901.7F0A31A3@hoppel.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nullfs in 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:25:05 -0000 On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Bjoern Koenig wrote: > Hello, > > first of all: > > THIS FILESYSTEM TYPE IS NOT YET FULLY SUPPORTED > (READ: IT DOESN'T WORK) AND USING IT MAY, IN FACT, > DESTROY DATA ON YOUR SYSTEM. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. > BEWARE OF DOG. SLIPPERY WHEN WET. > > My experience: > > I had much less problems with unionfs -b, even with FreeBSD 4.10, to mount > for example /usr/ports into a jail temporarily. But for everything else you > should never use it. BS, and then some ... I have 4 servers in place right now, each running a minimum of 30 jail'd environments (my most full is running 67 right now) where usr is mounted using unionfs -b from a central template ... the *only* issues that I have is with fsck's on a long uptime takes a bit of time ... The only caveat I'll make *against* unionfs at this time, and something that I'd like to see fixed eventually ... do not try and mount / and expect a jail to run ... there is a FIFO(?) created in the /var directory that will cause the server to panic ... but, from what I can tell, that is the only really big, outstanding bug that will hit you. Between David Schultz and Tor, most of the rest of the "easy to trigger" bugs have been cleaned up. Note: when I say "easy to trigger" ... as I said above, my servers run between 30 and 70 jail'd environments using unionfs, each jail'd environment being a totally different configuration, running within them anything from jabber, to aolserver, to jakarta-tomcat, etc ... the longest I've had a server run before doing an OS upgrade on it was ~120days or so, without a hitch ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 16:53:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E629E16A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:53:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.jmn.net.id (ns2.jmn.net.id [202.169.224.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4EEE543D67 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:53:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from say@id.or.id) Received: (qmail 10272 invoked by uid 512); 22 Jun 2004 23:53:43 +0700 Received: from say@id.or.id by mail.jmn.net.id by uid 504 with JMN-MailScanner-v7.6 2.60. ravlin: 8.4.2. h+bedv: 2.0.8-13. Clear:RC:1:. Processed in 3.695421 secs); 22 Jun 2004 16:53:43 -0000 X-JMN-MailScanner-Mail-From: say@id.or.id via mail.jmn.net.id X-JMN-MailScanner: v7.6 (Clear:RC:1:. Processed in 3.695421 secs) Received: from unknown (HELO Leptop) (202.169.230.241) by 0 with SMTP; 22 Jun 2004 23:53:39 +0700 Message-ID: <001b01c45879$789479a0$7b00a8c0@Leptop> From: "Sayid Munawar" To: "Roger Raymond" , References: <40D76004.5000403@asphyxia.com><006401c45811$3d9e2840$7b00a8c0@Leptop> <40D8326F.2060309@asphyxia.com> <40D84790.6050704@asphyxia.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:53:40 +0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Subject: Re: Trouble compiling lang/php4 (4.3.7) (solved - maybe) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:53:56 -0000 > Well... > > It appears that the mnoGoSearch option for the php-cli is not working > correctly. I recompiled the mnogosearch port then tried to compile php4 > WITH_MNOGOSEARCH=ON and it resulted in the libtool link error described > in previous posts. > > the lang/php4 port appears to compile successfully with all the other > options. > Yeah.. it worked. thanks a lot Roger --- Sayid Munawar IDwebhost. http://www.idwebhost.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 17:15:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7793616A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:15:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1985843D39 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:15:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from [207.41.94.233] (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5MHF3co023451; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:15:03 -0700 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 10:15:18 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <5.2.0.9.0.20040617113047.00a29970@127.0.0.1> In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.0.20040617113047.00a29970@127.0.0.1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406221015.18714.kstewart@owt.com> Subject: Re: Unable to build world X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:15:38 -0000 On Wednesday 16 June 2004 09:55 pm, Roger Merritt wrote: > I hadn't updated my world for quite a while, so I ran cvsup to make > sure I had the latest modifications to the code and then tried to run > "make buildworld". Failed. Tried again, failed. Went to the file > where the build failed, didn't see any problem. Deleted the whole > /usr/src directory and > Since it is trying to use a file from /usr/obj, have your rm'ed it. > ran cvsup to retrieve the whole body of code again. Still failed. I get: > >===> games/robots > >cc -O -pipe -march=pentium -DMAX_PER_UID=5 -c > >/usr/home/src/games/robots/extern.c > >cc -O -pipe -march=pentium -DMAX_PER_UID=5 -c > >/usr/home/src/games/robots/init_field.c > >cc -O -pipe -march=pentium -DMAX_PER_UID=5 -c > >/usr/home/src/games/robots/main.c > >In file included from /usr/home/src/games/robots/robots.h:36, > > from /usr/home/src/games/robots/main.c:48: > >/usr/obj/usr/home/src/i386/usr/include/curses.h:1281: undefined or > > invalid # directive > >*** Error code 1 > > > >Stop in /usr/home/src/games/robots. > >*** Error code 1 > > > >Stop in /usr/home/src/games. > >*** Error code 1 > > > >Stop in /usr/home/src. > >*** Error code 1 > > > >Stop in /usr/home/src. > >*** Error code 1 > > > >Stop in /usr/home/src. > > Incidentally, for space reasons I had to put the source tree in the > "home" directory (a separate slice on my hard drive) with a syslink > as /usr/src, but I've built world many times (at least several times) > since I did that and never had a problem before. The only time I have run into a problem with this is if I try to NFS mount /usr/src or /usr/obj. The build process remembers the real path and used it. It was not the same on the machine doing the mounting. When I setup a system to be NFS mountable, I put /usr/src and /usr/obj on their own partitions. Then, build process uses the same path on the machine doing the mounting. Kent > > uname -v gives me: FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #0: Tue May 6 18:29:38 ICT > 2003, my last cvsup completed successfully last night at about 2230 > hours local time. > > Is it possible I need to upgrade "make" or something like that? I > recall that was a problem once before. But what's with this weird > path /usr/obj/usr/home/src/i386/usr/include/curses.h?? vi opens the > file, and line 1281 is "#define BUTTON_SHIFT > 000200000000L", which doesn't look like an "undefined or invalid # > directive" to me. -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 19:33:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B6D16A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:33:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from afields.ca (afields.ca [216.194.67.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AEC743D1F for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:33:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from afields@afields.ca) Received: from afields.ca (localhost.afields.ca [127.0.0.1]) by afields.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5MJXJXQ026047; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:33:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from afields@afields.ca) Received: (from afields@localhost) by afields.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5MJXJlq026046; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:33:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from afields) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:33:19 -0400 From: Allan Fields To: Bjoern Koenig Message-ID: <20040622193319.GD594@afields.ca> References: <20040622120059.1F96F16A4F0@hub.freebsd.org> <20040622130901.7F0A31A3@hoppel.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040622130901.7F0A31A3@hoppel.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nullfs in 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:33:35 -0000 --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 03:09:18PM +0200, Bjoern Koenig wrote: > Hello, >=20 > first of all: >=20 > THIS FILESYSTEM TYPE IS NOT YET FULLY SUPPORTED > (READ: IT DOESN'T WORK) AND USING IT MAY, IN FACT, > DESTROY DATA ON YOUR SYSTEM. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK. > BEWARE OF DOG. SLIPPERY WHEN WET. Right, but that's only the short answer: "it's broken". The more in-depth answer is that while users may want to use them in production now: null and other pseudo file systems may still require some work for prime-time use and it's a valid concern for the platform. Those that raise the point aren't being unreasonable, I'm of the opinion it should be fixed at some point soon. Having said that: As to whether it belongs in -stable now: yes people are warned not to use it, why not just remove it? I think one argument to keep it in is for completeness: nullfs or similar belongs in the base (in BSD systems) and taking it out seems like the wrong answer from a technical standpoint. Also placing code in the corner won't fix it: even if it is made to work under 5, many want to use it in 4 still. ;) > My experience: >=20 > I had much less problems with unionfs -b, even with FreeBSD 4.10, to mount > for example /usr/ports into a jail temporarily. But for everything else y= ou > should never use it. What are some other approaches than overlays for jailed environments? Use NFS instead? > Bjoern --=20 Allan Fields, AFRSL - http://afields.ca 2D4F 6806 D307 0889 6125 C31D F745 0D72 39B4 5541 --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA2Il+90UNcjm0VUERAkQpAJ0WmRCckabAWPNaUScdImH2HUgdPACaArmP QrgXQQw3rytwujfIMT6sagM= =Pq99 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EuxKj2iCbKjpUGkD-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 19:46:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B57316A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:46:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381A643D39 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:46:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0FC3EEA1C6; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:46:02 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030ACEA1C5; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:46:02 -0300 (ADT) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:46:01 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Allan Fields In-Reply-To: <20040622193319.GD594@afields.ca> Message-ID: <20040622164400.D845@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20040622120059.1F96F16A4F0@hub.freebsd.org> <20040622130901.7F0A31A3@hoppel.local> <20040622193319.GD594@afields.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: Bjoern Koenig Subject: Re: nullfs in 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:46:13 -0000 On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Allan Fields wrote: > the wrong answer from a technical standpoint. Also placing code in the > corner won't fix it: even if it is made to work under 5, many want to > use it in 4 still. ;) Many *are* using it in 4 quite effectively ... those that tout it as being 'broken' all the time are those that are either trying to do something that is known to cause problems (ie. FIFOs) or those that look at the man page and 'quote scripture' :( ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 19:54:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA07E16A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:54:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shellma.zin.lublin.pl (shellma.zin.lublin.pl [212.182.126.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC1C43D41 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:54:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl) Received: by shellma.zin.lublin.pl (Postfix, from userid 1018) id AF4685F104; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:00:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:00:06 +0200 From: Pawel Malachowski To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20040622200006.GA24303@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> References: <20040622120059.1F96F16A4F0@hub.freebsd.org> <20040622130901.7F0A31A3@hoppel.local> <20040622193319.GD594@afields.ca> <20040622164400.D845@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20040622164400.D845@ganymede.hub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nullfs in 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:54:04 -0000 On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 04:46:01PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Many *are* using it in 4 quite effectively ... those that tout it as being > 'broken' all the time are those that are either trying to do something > that is known to cause problems (ie. FIFOs) I guess it is hard to do this with nullfs mounted ro (like kern/63662). -- Pawe³ Ma³achowski From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 20:50:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A3FF16A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:50:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from natsmtp00.rzone.de (natsmtp00.rzone.de [81.169.145.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEFE043D1F for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:50:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from hoppel.local (port-212-202-38-230.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.38.230]) by post.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5MKoUOp028705; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:50:30 +0200 (MEST) Received: from alpha (alpha.local [192.168.1.2]) by hoppel.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596431AF; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:50:25 +0200 (CEST) From: "Bjoern Koenig" To: "'Allan Fields'" Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:50:47 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <20040622193319.GD594@afields.ca> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thread-Index: AcRYj/P5Ka22IOclQniHcnufAfuALAACcMGw Message-Id: <20040622205025.596431AF@hoppel.local> cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: nullfs in 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 20:50:39 -0000 Allan Fields wrote: > What are some other approaches than overlays > for jailed environments? Use NFS instead? You're right. NFS on localhost instead of nullfs is a very good solution. Works perfectly as expected. I don't know why it didn't cross my mind. Thank you. Bjoern From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 22:27:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D7EA16A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:27:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gizmo04bw.bigpond.com (gizmo04bw.bigpond.com [144.140.70.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BFF543D1D for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:27:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from areilly@bigpond.net.au) Received: (qmail 10210 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2004 22:17:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bwmam02.bigpond.com) (144.135.24.72) by gizmo04bw.bigpond.com with SMTP; 22 Jun 2004 22:17:28 -0000 Received: from cpe-138-130-188-103.nsw.bigpond.net.au ([138.130.188.103]) by bwmam02.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2a 17/14142332) with SMTP id 14142332; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:27:41 +1000 Received: (qmail 25486 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2004 22:29:31 -0000 Received: from chani.reilly.home (HELO ?10.0.0.7?) (10.0.0.7) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jun 2004 22:29:31 -0000 In-Reply-To: References: <02b701c456c3$20f20580$7b00a8c0@Leptop> <20040621070143.GA87493@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040621203228.GB99917@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <6742AF22-C49B-11D8-9BB3-000D93AF6052@bigpond.net.au> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Andrew Reilly Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:27:53 +1000 To: Kris Kennaway X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libtool problem or SMP problem or port problem or what? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:27:45 -0000 Hi Kris, > At 1:32 PM -0700 2004/06/21, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 10:05:29AM -0400, Chris Pepper wrote: >>> At 12:01 AM -0700 2004/06/21, Kris Kennaway wrote: >>> >>> > > [root@elf XFree86-4-libraries]# make clean USE_LIBTOOL_VER=15 >>> > >>> >USE_* are not to be specified by the user, they're only for use >>> within >>> >port makefiles. You discovered the consequence, I'll leave the >>> reason >>> >for you to figure out as an instructive exercise about the ports >>> >collection :) >>> >>> Hmm. This raises the question, then, of why a couple of my >>> ports have recently told me to set something like USE_BASE_OPENSSL >>> or >>> USE_PORT_OPENSSL to install (as I recall, a vulnerability check was >>> failing). This worked, although I had to remove an OpenSSL >>> dependency >>> in pkgdb -F later. >> >> USE_* variables are not to be specified by the user. User control >> variables are WITH_* and WITHOUT_* (WITH_OPENSSL_(BASE|PORT) are >> probably what you were referring to here). What about USE_LANG=en_US.ISO_8859-1? I seem to remember the OpenOffice port whinging if that wasn't set. Not that that port built on my system the last time I tried, anyway... Cheers, -- Andrew From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 23:06:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDC616A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:06:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462EA43D49 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:06:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 269C572DF4; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:06:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2466972DF2; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:06:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:06:16 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Kyle Mott In-Reply-To: <1087674680.10738.1.camel@architect.klmhosting.net> Message-ID: <20040622160531.Y79584@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <40D233A7.6080002@xraided.net> <20040619114158.X48022@carver.gumbysoft.com> <1087674680.10738.1.camel@architect.klmhosting.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panic on 4.10 (Not sure of Cause) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:06:18 -0000 On Sat, 19 Jun 2004, Kyle Mott wrote: > > Sadly, your crashdump appears to be corrupted and isn't useful. > > > What would (could?) cause a corruption like this? Is there something I > did wrong? Sometimes you can get corruption if your system starts using swap before savecore comes along and rescues the crashdump. Sometimes the disk borks and drops the writes on the floor during the crashdump. There's a few other possibilities. :( -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 23:06:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD65616A4CF for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:06:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ylpvm15.prodigy.net (ylpvm15-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7781C43D46 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:06:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-35.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.35])i5MN6ZVh011488; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 19:06:36 -0400 Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7A13352911; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:06:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 16:06:30 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Andrew Reilly Message-ID: <20040622230630.GA24452@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <02b701c456c3$20f20580$7b00a8c0@Leptop> <20040621070143.GA87493@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040621203228.GB99917@xor.obsecurity.org> <6742AF22-C49B-11D8-9BB3-000D93AF6052@bigpond.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6742AF22-C49B-11D8-9BB3-000D93AF6052@bigpond.net.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: libtool problem or SMP problem or port problem or what? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:06:39 -0000 --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 08:27:53AM +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote: > Hi Kris, >=20 > >At 1:32 PM -0700 2004/06/21, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 10:05:29AM -0400, Chris Pepper wrote: > >>> At 12:01 AM -0700 2004/06/21, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>> > >>> > > [root@elf XFree86-4-libraries]# make clean USE_LIBTOOL_VER=3D15 > >>> > > >>> >USE_* are not to be specified by the user, they're only for use=20 > >>>within > >>> >port makefiles. You discovered the consequence, I'll leave the=20 > >>>reason > >>> >for you to figure out as an instructive exercise about the ports > >>> >collection :) > >>> > >>> Hmm. This raises the question, then, of why a couple of my > >>> ports have recently told me to set something like USE_BASE_OPENSSL=20 > >>>or > >>> USE_PORT_OPENSSL to install (as I recall, a vulnerability check was > >>> failing). This worked, although I had to remove an OpenSSL=20 > >>>dependency > >>> in pkgdb -F later. > >> > >>USE_* variables are not to be specified by the user. User control > >>variables are WITH_* and WITHOUT_* (WITH_OPENSSL_(BASE|PORT) are > >>probably what you were referring to here). >=20 > What about USE_LANG=3Den_US.ISO_8859-1? I seem to remember the=20 > OpenOffice port whinging if that wasn't set. Not that that port built=20 > on my system the last time I tried, anyway... There are unfortunately still some confusing inconsistencies :-( The OO ports do have lots of other problems though.. Kris --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA2Lt2Wry0BWjoQKURAivLAJ446yCIJdcZMQSF8fbyWs8kMGNsYQCg0MGI g8fVN3YCh70t4TE0vRKZIag= =Ls/u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 23:14:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495FD16A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:14:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mizar.origin-it.net (mizar.origin-it.net [194.8.96.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722E443D2D for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:14:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: from matar.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com (dehsfw3e.origin-it.net [194.8.96.68])i5MNEnvV050407 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:14:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: from dehhx004.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com (dehhx004.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com [161.90.164.40]) ESMTP id i5MNEnLo087939; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:14:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: by dehhx004.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:14:49 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Oldach, Helge" To: "'Pawel Malachowski'" , "Marc G. Fournier" Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:14:47 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: nullfs in 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:14:53 -0000 > From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Pawel Malachowski > On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 04:46:01PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > Many *are* using it in 4 quite effectively ... those that tout it as being > > 'broken' all the time are those that are either trying to do something > > that is known to cause problems (ie. FIFOs) > > I guess it is hard to do this with nullfs mounted ro (like kern/63662). Yes, and tjr@ also had compiled some nullfs fixes some time ago which didn't yet get committed: http://people.freebsd.org/~tjr/nullfs-4.diff. Tim said he would want to "check some things first" but probably got distracted. Helge From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 23:17:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C5B16A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:17:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gizmo04bw.bigpond.com (gizmo04bw.bigpond.com [144.140.70.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 67CF343D5D for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:17:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@burren.cx) Received: (qmail 7718 invoked from network); 22 Jun 2004 23:07:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bwmam12.bigpond.com) (144.135.24.103) by gizmo04bw.bigpond.com with SMTP; 22 Jun 2004 23:07:37 -0000 Received: from cpe-203-51-173-210.vic.bigpond.net.au ([203.51.173.210]) by bwmam12.bigpond.com(MAM REL_3_4_2a 189/30245982) with SMTP id 30245982; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:17:50 +1000 X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by falco.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id D21FCC9C26; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:17:25 +1000 In-Reply-To: <20040622205025.596431AF@hoppel.local> References: <20040622205025.596431AF@hoppel.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <524C55FA-C4A2-11D8-9290-000A95E682D0@burren.cx> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Burren Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:17:25 +1000 To: "Bjoern Koenig" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nullfs in 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:17:59 -0000 On 23/06/2004, at 6:50 AM, Bjoern Koenig wrote: > NFS on localhost instead of nullfs is a very good solution. I beg to differ. Although it may have worked in some situations for you, static loopback NFS mounts can be a big problem. Obviously when you're mounting the filesystem you need nfsd up (that's obvious, and most people think of that) but when shutting down you should umount (or sync) the filesystem before killing off the daemons, which is not the usual way of a shutdown... I learnt this the hard way years ago with Ultrix/Solaris/HPOX machines, and I don't FreeBSD has changed the way shutdown works dramatically... I'm another person who has actively been using nullfs for years on 4 and love it. It allows me to mount areas of my filesystems as read-only. In things like my image management software it allows the software to give out concurrent separate RO and RW paths to objects. I just wish nullfs was also available on OSX... __ David Burren From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 23:26:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FE016A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:26:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mizar.origin-it.net (mizar.origin-it.net [194.8.96.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C94D643D48 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:26:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: from matar.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com (dehsfw3e.origin-it.net [194.8.96.68])i5MNQaMC051589 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:26:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: from dehhx004.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com (dehhx004.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com [161.90.164.40]) ESMTP id i5MNQaNv089737; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:26:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: by dehhx004.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:26:36 +0200 Message-ID: From: "Oldach, Helge" To: "'Bjoern Koenig'" , "'Allan Fields'" Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:26:35 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: nullfs in 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:26:45 -0000 > From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Bjoern Koenig > > NFS on localhost instead of nullfs is a very > good solution. Err, no, the overhead is *much* higher than plain nullfs or unionfs. Local NFS is essentially fiddling file system access through the networking subsystem. Helge From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 23:48:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD89516A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:48:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from natnoddy.rzone.de (natnoddy.rzone.de [81.169.145.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4842243D45 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:48:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from hoppel.local (port-212-202-38-230.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.38.230]) by post.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5MNmWjc006861; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:48:32 +0200 (MEST) Received: from alpha (alpha.local [192.168.1.2]) by hoppel.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D47260; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:48:27 +0200 (CEST) From: "Bjoern Koenig" To: "'Oldach, Helge'" Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:48:51 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Thread-Index: AcRYsG46JX5cj3nmS3CigF1qI2gYNgAAaHtg In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <20040622234827.7D47260@hoppel.local> cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: nullfs in 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 23:48:44 -0000 > Bjoern Koenig wrote: > > > NFS on localhost instead of nullfs is a very > > good solution. Helge Oldach wrote: > Err, no, the overhead is *much* higher than plain nullfs > or unionfs. Local NFS is essentially fiddling file system > access through the networking subsystem. Ok, I think my exclamation was too officious. I didn't want to say that loopback NFS is the solution for all problems concerning nullfs. But it's a very elegant solution for my purposes concerning jails and especially with /usr/ports and some small other things; overhead isn't a serious problem in my case. - Sorry for inconvenience. Bjoern From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 07:29:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1169A16A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 07:29:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ms-smtp-02.tampabay.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-smtplb.tampabay.rr.com [65.32.5.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A004A43D58 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 07:29:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@danworld.net) Received: from danworld (211-93.202-68.tampabay.rr.com [68.202.93.211]) i5N7TGnc006212 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 03:29:19 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200406230729.i5N7TGnc006212@ms-smtp-02.tampabay.rr.com> From: "Dan Piparo" To: Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 03:29:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcRY88t4ac4nYaknRQW8AQX6BpWY9Q== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: ifconfig netmask problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 07:29:33 -0000 Hello, I just upgraded my server to FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE from FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE and I've seemed to have a problem with ifconfig. I have an em0 interface and on the primary IP address I have the netmask set at 255.255.255.128 because I have a /25 IP block, and the primary IP address is pingable. The problem that I'm having is with the alias IPs, I've had the netmask set for them at 255.255.255.255 for years and they worked fine, but now the alias IPs that I have aren't pingable at all. The strange thing is, when I change the netmask to something like 255.255.255.0 or 255.255.255.254 it is pingable. What I really want to know, what is the proper netmask for an alias IP address for the latest FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE version. Did it change for some reason? Any help would be most appreciated. Regards, Dan Piparo From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 08:23:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6225D16A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:23:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F2A43D1D for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:23:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (fqpszc@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5N8NNuS060699 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:23:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5N8NNrO060698; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:23:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 10:23:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200406230823.i5N8NNrO060698@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20040622164400.D845@ganymede.hub.org> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.5.4-20000523 ("1959") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.10-RELEASE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: nullfs in 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:23:27 -0000 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Allan Fields wrote: > > the wrong answer from a technical standpoint. Also placing code in the > > corner won't fix it: even if it is made to work under 5, many want to > > use it in 4 still. ;) > > Many *are* using it in 4 quite effectively ... those that tout it as being > 'broken' all the time are those that are either trying to do something > that is known to cause problems (ie. FIFOs) or those that look at the man > page and 'quote scripture' :( Or those that run user shells within jails. Users tend to find out surpsisingly quickly how to panic machines. I changed to using NFS loopback mounts within jails, and it works perfectly fine. The NFS overhead is neglectible (it almost seems like the NFS code takes some shotcuts when run through localhost), it doesn't "feel" slower than direct local disk mounts. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "To this day, many C programmers believe that 'strong typing' just means pounding extra hard on the keyboard." -- Peter van der Linden From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 08:42:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCF916A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:42:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.iinet.net.au (mail-09.iinet.net.au [203.59.3.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3059043D31 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:42:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com) Received: (qmail 26108 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2004 08:42:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.100.0.154?) (203.173.42.29) by mail.iinet.net.au with SMTP; 23 Jun 2004 08:42:26 -0000 From: Warren Liddell To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:42:18 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200406230729.i5N7TGnc006212@ms-smtp-02.tampabay.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <200406230729.i5N7TGnc006212@ms-smtp-02.tampabay.rr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406231842.18646.shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com> Subject: Re: ifconfig netmask problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: shinjii@virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:42:42 -0000 On Wednesday 23 June 2004 17:29, Dan Piparo wrote: > Hello, > > > > I just upgraded my server to FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE from FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE > and I've seemed to have a problem with ifconfig. > > > > I have an em0 interface and on the primary IP address I have the netmask > set at 255.255.255.128 because I have a /25 IP block, and the primary IP > address is pingable. The problem that I'm having is with the alias IPs, > I've had the netmask set for them at 255.255.255.255 for years and they > worked fine, but now the alias IPs that I have aren't pingable at all. The > strange thing is, when I change the netmask to something like 255.255.255.0 > or > 255.255.255.254 it is pingable. > > > > What I really want to know, what is the proper netmask for an alias IP > address for the latest FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE version. Did it change for some > reason? > > > > Any help would be most appreciated. I have had to do a lil aliasing mysel fof l8 .. but i use this website as a source fo rit. http://freebsd.peon.net/tutorials/6/ -- Yours Sincerely Shinjii http://virusinfo.rdksupportinc.com From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 09:03:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90AF616A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:03:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1E643D2F for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:03:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 5C836530D; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:03:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 83B03530A; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:03:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 2E5CCB86C; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:03:38 +0200 (CEST) To: "Dan Piparo" References: <200406230729.i5N7TGnc006212@ms-smtp-02.tampabay.rr.com> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:03:38 +0200 In-Reply-To: <200406230729.i5N7TGnc006212@ms-smtp-02.tampabay.rr.com> (Dan Piparo's message of "Wed, 23 Jun 2004 03:29:18 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ifconfig netmask problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:03:47 -0000 "Dan Piparo" writes: > What I really want to know, what is the proper netmask for an alias IP > address for the latest FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE version. Did it change for so= me > reason? "it depends" if the alias is on the same subnet as an existing address (whether on that interface or another) it must have an all-bits-one netmask to avoid routing ambiguity. if it is on a different subnet, it should have the correct netmask for that subnet. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 11:01:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8077316A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:01:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nbh-gw.newchem.ru (platan.newchem.ru [81.3.149.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2762343D31 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:01:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illich@newchem.ru) Received: from ash.nbh.newchem.ru ([192.168.204.4]) by nbh-gw.newchem.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5NB1XPB016250 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:01:33 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from illich@newchem.ru) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:00:12 +0400 From: Illia Baidakov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62q) Personal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1447547963.20040623150012@newchem.ru> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.1-beta; AVE 6.25.0.62; VDF 6.25.0.94 (host: nbh-gw.newchem.ru) Subject: Annoying delays appeared while connecting to the server X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Illia Baidakov List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 11:01:44 -0000 Hello freebsd-stable, I noticed it about a week ago. My local hosts have suffering such delays while connecting to the (imho) tcp-wrapped services, namely ssh, smtp, mysql. It looks like the addresses to names resolving. I don't need to resolve my local names or addresses now. There was not any delays early. But they have appeared without any visable reason. What could to involve a such system behaviour? How should I return my system to previous state? P.S. I will not want neither to edit the /etc/hosts file nor create and maintain dns-zones for the internal hosts. -- Thanks in advance Illia Baidakov. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 13:33:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A8F16A4D7 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:33:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from files.jawa.at (jawa.at [213.229.17.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244AE43D41 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:33:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mranner@inode.at) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by files.jawa.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6532FDC1 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:32:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from files.jawa.at ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (files.jawa.at [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55632-10 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:32:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: by files.jawa.at (Postfix, from userid 60) id 1EC98FDBB; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:32:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from walgrind.jawa.at (walgrind.jawa.at [192.168.200.56]) by files.jawa.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F48FDB9 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:32:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Michael Ranner To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:32:33 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <20040622205025.596431AF@hoppel.local> <524C55FA-C4A2-11D8-9290-000A95E682D0@burren.cx> In-Reply-To: <524C55FA-C4A2-11D8-9290-000A95E682D0@burren.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406231532.33780.mranner@inode.at> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on files.jawa.at X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Level: X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at jawa.at Subject: Re: nullfs in 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:33:14 -0000 Am Mittwoch, 23. Juni 2004 01:17 schrieb David Burren: > > I'm another person who has actively been using nullfs for years on 4 > and love it. It allows me to mount areas of my filesystems as I'm also using nullfs for years up to 4.9, make buildworld on it regularly, without problems. Now this system is updated to 4.10 and I am curious if I will have the same problems. -- /\/\ichael Ranner mranner@inode.at - mranner@jawa.at - mranner@bugat.at ----------------------------------------------------- BSD Usergroup Austria - http://www.bugat.at/ -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- GIT/CS/AT dx(-) s+:(++:) a- C++ UBLVS++++$ P++>+++$ L-(+)$ E--- W+++$ N+(++) o-- K- w--()$ O-(--) M@ V-(--) PS+>++ PE(-) Y+ PGP(-) t+ 5+ X+++(++++) R* tv++ b+(++) DI++ D-(--) G- e h--(*) r++ y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 13:40:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2026E16A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:40:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from enterprise.another.com.au (dsl-210-15-193-5.TAS.netspace.net.au [210.15.193.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B901D43D5D for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:40:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from richard@another.com.au) Received: from enterprise.another.com.au (nobody@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i5NDUNWf086024 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 23:30:23 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from richard@enterprise.another.com.au) Received: from localhost (richard@localhost)i5NDUMOS086021 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 23:30:23 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from richard@enterprise.another.com.au) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 23:30:22 +1000 (EST) From: Richard Beyer To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040623232823.V85983@enterprise.another.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.73, clamav-milter version 0.73a on enterprise.another.com.au X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (enterprise.another.com.au) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-100.7 required=4.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on mail.another.com.au Subject: Netmask issue in ucd-snmp X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:40:59 -0000 Don't know who to report this to, the netmask in /etc/snmpd.conf for ucd-snmp doesn't work as expected. a.b.c.d/27 reported an error, had to resort to a.b.c.d/24 to get it to allow my sub net to query it. Richard From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 15:51:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B89F16A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:51:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sv07e.atm-tzs.kmjeuro.com (sv07e.atm-tzs.kmjeuro.com [193.81.94.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C41843D5E for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:51:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from k.joch@ctseuro.com) Received: from [192.168.2.30] (adsl.sbg.kmjeuro.com [62.99.198.46]) (authenticated bits=0)i5NFjNC3007623 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 17:45:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from k.joch@ctseuro.com) Message-ID: <40D9A58E.2040703@ctseuro.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 17:45:18 +0200 From: "Karl M. Joch" Organization: CTS User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CTS-SV07-Mailserver-Information: please visit www.ctseuro.com for further instructions. Protected by www.ctseuro.com X-CTS-SV07-Mailserver: Found to be clean X-CTS-SV07-Mailserver-From: k.joch@ctseuro.com Subject: 5.2.1 with 40000 virus scanned mails / day on Dell hardware?(Hardware suggestions) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:51:10 -0000 Hello, I need to setup 3 servers on different locations as mail gateway with about 40k mail per day each. the servers runs MailScanner, Clamav and Spamassassin. The customer has Dell hardware and only buys Dell hardware. Has anybody experience with Dell servers which runs under FreeBSD. I think about systems with Dual Xeon 3.0, 4 GB Ram and fast SCSI Hot Plug Raid 5 which should be strong enough to handle that amount of mails forwarding them to a Notes server. Many thanks, -- Best regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Karl M. Joch From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 16:14:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297EE16A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:14:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mailtest.sd73.bc.ca (mailtest.sd73.bc.ca [142.24.13.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA9543D5C for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:14:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailtest.sd73.bc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162B580000; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:14:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailtest.sd73.bc.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailtest.sd73.bc.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77975-10; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:14:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mailtest.sd73.bc.ca (Postfix, from userid 80) id 9AC7180011; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:13:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 192.168.0.85 (SquirrelMail authenticated user fcash); by mailtest.sd73.bc.ca with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:13:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1069.192.168.0.85.1088007236.squirrel@192.168.0.85> In-Reply-To: <40D9A58E.2040703@ctseuro.com> References: <40D9A58E.2040703@ctseuro.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:13:56 -0700 (PDT) From: "Freddie Cash" To: "Karl M. Joch" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at sd73.bc.ca cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2.1 with 40000 virus scanned mails / day on Dell hardware?(Hardware suggestions) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:14:06 -0000 > I need to setup 3 servers on different locations as mail gateway with > about 40k mail per day each. the servers runs MailScanner, Clamav and > Spamassassin. The customer has Dell hardware and only buys Dell > hardware. > Has anybody experience with Dell servers which runs under FreeBSD. I > think about systems with Dual Xeon 3.0, 4 GB Ram and fast SCSI Hot > Plug Raid 5 which should be strong enough to handle that amount of > mails forwarding them to a Notes server. Wow! That's overkill, and then some. :) I don't have direct experience with Dell servers (we're actively replacing those with white-box systems), but me experience with a mail gateways follows: We're running a dual-AthlonMP 2600+ (1.8 GHz) system with 3.5 GB DDR RAM, and 3x200 GB WD IDE drives in RAID 5 acting as mail gateway. Software includes FreeBSD 5.2.1-p8, Postfix, Amavisd-new, SpamAssassin, and ClamAV. This server handles virus / spam filtering for 15 domains, and about 25,000 unique mail accounts (15,000 staff, 10,000 students, give or take a bit). We get a hell of a lot of messages per day (although I haven't tracked the exact number or trends yet, but could extrapolate around the 50,000 mark), and I've yet to see the server CPU load get above 5 - 10 % and the system load rarely goes above 2.0. The mail queue rarely gets above 200 messages, and most of those are bounce messages to non-existent or uncooperative servers. (This server is also being used to test Courier-IMAP and Cyrus-IMAP with SquirrelMail, so there's the odd spike during testing, but everyday use never taxes the system). We're actually planning on replacing this with a non-RAID system with a single AthlonXP or Athlon64 so we can use this server as part of the back-end of the new mail system coming in next month. -- Freddie Cash, CCNT CCLP Helpdesk / Network Support Tech. School District 73 (250) 377-HELP [377-4357] fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 16:15:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C883B16A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:15:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lists.frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CD643D48 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:15:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olive@oban.frmug.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.frmug.org (Postfix/TLS) with ESMTP id 01DF420F62 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:15:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lists.frmug.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (frmug.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29527-05 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:15:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by lists.frmug.org (Postfix/TLS, from userid 66) id AD59120F5D; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:15:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by weirdos.oban.frmug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA928C33 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:12:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: by weirdos.oban.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 9D0C98C28; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:12:29 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:12:29 +0200 From: Olivier Tharan To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040623161229.GJ37909@weirdos.oban.frmug.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <40D9A58E.2040703@ctseuro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40D9A58E.2040703@ctseuro.com> X-Attribution: Olive X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at frmug.org Subject: Re: 5.2.1 with 40000 virus scanned mails / day on Dell hardware?(Hardware suggestions) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:15:32 -0000 * Karl M. Joch (20040623 17:45): > I need to setup 3 servers on different locations as mail gateway with > about 40k mail per day each. the servers runs MailScanner, Clamav and > Spamassassin. The customer has Dell hardware and only buys Dell hardware. > > Has anybody experience with Dell servers which runs under FreeBSD. I > think about systems with Dual Xeon 3.0, 4 GB Ram and fast SCSI Hot Plug > Raid 5 which should be strong enough to handle that amount of mails > forwarding them to a Notes server. If you are looking for 5.2.1, you are on the wrong list. Anyway, a Pentium III with 256 Mb RAM handles virus scanning and spam tagging for ~ 60k mails a day without any problem. Your biggest bottleneck might be the Notes server. -- olive From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 16:43:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56EE516A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:43:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (mproxy.gmail.com [216.239.56.253]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 425C243D46 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:43:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from varque@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id r62so17351cwc for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:43:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.98.30 with SMTP id v30mr44646rnb; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:43:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:43:37 -0400 From: a clever sheep To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1069.192.168.0.85.1088007236.squirrel@192.168.0.85> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <40D9A58E.2040703@ctseuro.com> <1069.192.168.0.85.1088007236.squirrel@192.168.0.85> Subject: Re: Re: 5.2.1 with 40000 virus scanned mails / day on Dell hardware?(Hardware suggestions) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:43:39 -0000 On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:13:56 -0700 (PDT), Freddie Cash wrote: > > take a bit). We get a hell of a lot of messages per day (although I > haven't tracked the exact number or trends yet, but could extrapolate > around the 50,000 mark), and I've yet to see the server CPU load get the mail/mailgraph port can provide you with rrdtool-style graphs that give you a good indicator of how mail is being handled in the amavisd-new envrionment, if you are curious. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 19:46:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E591516A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:46:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obh.snafu.de (obh.snafu.de [213.73.92.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11B843D5A for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:46:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ob@gruft.de) Received: from ob by obh.snafu.de with local (Exim 4.32; FreeBSD) id 1BdDgI-000EQ3-CB for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 21:45:14 +0200 Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 21:45:14 +0200 From: Oliver Brandmueller To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040623194514.GG67092@e-Gitt.NET> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <40D9A58E.2040703@ctseuro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40D9A58E.2040703@ctseuro.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: Oliver Brandmueller Subject: Re: 5.2.1 with 40000 virus scanned mails / day on Dell hardware?(Hardware suggestions) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 19:46:14 -0000 Hi. On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 05:45:18PM +0200, Karl M. Joch wrote: > I need to setup 3 servers on different locations as mail gateway with > about 40k mail per day each. the servers runs MailScanner, Clamav and > Spamassassin. The customer has Dell hardware and only buys Dell hardware. > > Has anybody experience with Dell servers which runs under FreeBSD. I > think about systems with Dual Xeon 3.0, 4 GB Ram and fast SCSI Hot Plug > Raid 5 which should be strong enough to handle that amount of mails > forwarding them to a Notes server. Our current setup for exim + amavisd-new incl. SpamAssassin and clamav consists of a bunch of boxes with 2.4 GHz Xeon, 2 Gigs of RAM and 3ware SATA RAID 10 on 4 10k rpm disks. Each of these machines handles about half a million mails per day (though we currently have enough machines to load them with only about 300,000 mails per day). With only 40k mails per day you should not see any problems, but you should consider using RAID 1 or RAID 10 because for this task I/O is the bottleneck, not so much CPU. I disabled swapping completely btw. - Oliver -- | Oliver Brandmueller | Offenbacher Str. 1 | Germany D-14197 Berlin | | Fon +49-172-3130856 | Fax +49-172-3145027 | WWW: http://the.addict.de/ | | Ich bin das Internet. Sowahr ich Gott helfe. | | Eine gewerbliche Nutzung aller enthaltenen Adressen ist nicht gestattet! | From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 21:10:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C510816A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 21:10:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay.epsb.ca (relay.epsb.ca [198.161.119.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977B543D1F for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 21:10:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Sean.Page@epsb.ca) Received: from exchange03.epsb.ca (exchange03.epsb.ca [10.0.5.11]) by relay.epsb.ca (8.12.8p2/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5NLA0KE065782 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:10:00 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from Sean.Page@epsb.ca) Received: by exchange03.epsb.ca with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:12:59 -0600 Message-ID: From: Sean Page To: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:10:07 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Subject: RE: 5.2.1 with 40000 virus scanned mails / day on Dell hardware?( Hardware suggestions) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 21:10:42 -0000 FWIW, we have racks of Dell PE2650s and 1750s of assorted configurations humming along very nicely with FreeBSD. We've had great success with them. Sean Sean Page Network Analyst, Internet Services Information Technology Services Edmonton Public Schools Phone: (780) 429-8206 http://its.epsb.ca Supporting teaching and learning through the effective use of Technology. -----Original Message----- From: Karl M. Joch [mailto:k.joch@ctseuro.com] Sent: June 23, 2004 9:45 AM To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: 5.2.1 with 40000 virus scanned mails / day on Dell hardware?(Hardware suggestions) Hello, I need to setup 3 servers on different locations as mail gateway with about 40k mail per day each. the servers runs MailScanner, Clamav and Spamassassin. The customer has Dell hardware and only buys Dell hardware. Has anybody experience with Dell servers which runs under FreeBSD. I think about systems with Dual Xeon 3.0, 4 GB Ram and fast SCSI Hot Plug Raid 5 which should be strong enough to handle that amount of mails forwarding them to a Notes server. Many thanks, -- Best regards / Mit freundlichen Gruessen, Karl M. Joch _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 21:32:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EABA916A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 21:32:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from jk.homeunix.net (dhcp-19-33.dsl.CSUChico.EDU [132.241.19.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A2143D46 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 21:32:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jk@jk.homeunix.net) Received: from jk.homeunix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jk.homeunix.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5NLV7LN080508 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:31:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from warlock@localhost) by jk.homeunix.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5NLV70l080507; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:31:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 14:31:07 -0700 From: John Kennedy To: "Karl M. Joch" Message-ID: <20040623213107.GA79315@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> References: <40D9A58E.2040703@ctseuro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40D9A58E.2040703@ctseuro.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-jk-MailScanner: No infection found X-jk-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.9, required 6, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90) X-jk-MailScanner-From: warlock@jk.homeunix.net cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2.1 with 40000 virus scanned mails / day on Dell hardware?(Hardware suggestions) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 21:32:05 -0000 On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 05:45:18PM +0200, Karl M. Joch wrote: > I need to setup 3 servers on different locations as mail gateway with > about 40k mail per day each. the servers runs MailScanner, Clamav and > Spamassassin. The customer has Dell hardware and only buys Dell hardware. I've got a couple of 2650s (2x2.4GHz and 2x3GHz Xeons) doing that fairly well. It is front-ending ~30K email accounts. > Has anybody experience with Dell servers which runs under FreeBSD. I > think about systems with Dual Xeon 3.0, 4 GB Ram and fast SCSI Hot Plug > Raid 5 which should be strong enough to handle that amount of mails > forwarding them to a Notes server. We're running 5.2.1 (-p8 now), mostly for the bge0 support (at the time, 4.9+ wasn't recognizing the built-in Broadcom BCM5703 Gigabit Ethernet). We're also running with HT, and since it passed the initial stress testing we decided to go with it. We end up with ~100K emails per day, and we manage to keep up. When the spammers are normal, things are Ok, but every now and then one decides to totally bomb us and we'll end up with queues 40K-75K deep that'll take half a day to clear. 95% of the time that is totally fine, but 5% of the time (not real statistics) we get tied to the anvil and tossed into the deep end of the pool and we wanted the extra pony-power. We've spent a long time and have a lot of students over the years one the one machine so we get hit with a lot of email for people that aren't here anymore, which can act to increase the user-count if you're not careful. Typical CPU utilization is generally low, so we don't end up CPU bound unless we get bombed (and then the load gets up into the 6-7 range). I don't think that disk I/O ends up being a big factor, but we have 2G of RAM in those to try and keep things in cache and that certainly works pretty good for us. We tend to have ~10K of bogus unreturnable-to-sender spam backlogged and that can cause the queue-runners to pile up, and the mailscanner perl processes with clamav+spamassassin in them are huge. This is not a mail-server, it is only a MX so unless we're backlogged we're probably running out of cache on not really hitting the disk much. My $.02: Anytime you act as a MX relay, be sure you have some way of knowing what are legitimate users or not so you can give the smaller the 5xx permanent failure messages rather then 4xx (or accepting, then trying to bounce email to bogus addresses). You'll save yourself a lot of busywork that way and you're server will scale better. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 01:43:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F40916A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:43:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outbound0.sv.meer.net (outbound0.sv.meer.net [205.217.152.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D29B43D1D for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:43:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (mail.meer.net [209.157.152.14]) i5O1gNGO072588; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:42:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: from mail.meer.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.meer.net (8.12.10/8.12.2/meer) with ESMTP id i5O1gMWM075529; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:42:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett@mail.meer.net) Received: (from jrhett@localhost) by mail.meer.net (8.12.1/8.12.10) id i5O1gMqO075526; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:42:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jrhett) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:42:22 -0700 From: Joe Rhett To: "Karl M. Joch" Message-ID: <20040624014222.GB74718@meer.net> Mail-Followup-To: "Karl M. Joch" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <40D9A58E.2040703@ctseuro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40D9A58E.2040703@ctseuro.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Meer.net LLC cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.2.1 with 40000 virus scanned mails / day on Dell hardware?(Hardware suggestions) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 01:43:02 -0000 > Has anybody experience with Dell servers which runs under FreeBSD. I > think about systems with Dual Xeon 3.0, 4 GB Ram and fast SCSI Hot Plug > Raid 5 which should be strong enough to handle that amount of mails > forwarding them to a Notes server. I would use RAID 0+1 or just plain RAID 0 since these should be cookie-cutter. -- Joe Rhett Senior Systems Engineer Meer.net From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 02:17:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CAD316A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 02:17:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp-gw-cl-c.dmv.com (smtp-gw-cl-c.dmv.com [216.240.97.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D176443D1D for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 02:17:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sven@dmv.com) Received: from mail-gw-cl-b.dmv.com (mail-gw-cl-b.dmv.com [216.240.97.39]) i5O2HM9D013887 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 22:17:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from sven@dmv.com) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (dogpound.dyndns.org [64.45.134.154]) by mail-gw-cl-b.dmv.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5O2HLnq010940 for ; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 22:17:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from sven@dmv.com) Message-ID: <40DA39C8.4020804@dmv.com> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 22:17:44 -0400 From: Sven Willenberger User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <40D9A58E.2040703@ctseuro.com> <20040624014222.GB74718@meer.net> In-Reply-To: <20040624014222.GB74718@meer.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Subject: Re: 5.2.1 with 40000 virus scanned mails / day on Dellhardware?(Hardware suggestions) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 02:17:46 -0000 Joe Rhett wrote: >>Has anybody experience with Dell servers which runs under FreeBSD. I >>think about systems with Dual Xeon 3.0, 4 GB Ram and fast SCSI Hot Plug >>Raid 5 which should be strong enough to handle that amount of mails >>forwarding them to a Notes server. > > > I would use RAID 0+1 or just plain RAID 0 since these should be > cookie-cutter. > I agree that a basic RAID may be desirable. We have a series of dual Xeon 2.4GHz with 1-2Gig RAM processing maybe 1/2 million pieces of email a day. These machines in particular do spamassassin and run in parallel (6 machines behind a load balancer). During mail bombs the machines show signs of sweating under the perl load and there is the recurring issus of either softupdates causing backtraces or some other memory paging event causing them - again only under the severest of loads. We do not use a RAID solution on those so using a simple strip may help avoid the situation we are seeing (5.2.1-Release-P8). We also use FreeBSD on our primary MX machines (again a load-balanced series of 3 machines) and these are not running any perl processes - simply sendmail with extensive access lists. These machines run flawlessly and combined handle some 2 million+ emails a day. Sven From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 03:41:12 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3663816A4CF for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 03:41:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C199043D55 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 03:41:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B79A472DF4; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B273272DF2; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:41:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:41:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Illia Baidakov In-Reply-To: <1447547963.20040623150012@newchem.ru> Message-ID: <20040623203701.L92305@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <1447547963.20040623150012@newchem.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Annoying delays appeared while connecting to the server X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 03:41:12 -0000 On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Illia Baidakov wrote: > Hello freebsd-stable, > > I noticed it about a week ago. My local hosts have suffering > such delays while connecting to the (imho) tcp-wrapped services, > namely ssh, smtp, mysql. > It looks like the addresses to names resolving. I don't need to resolve my > local names or addresses now. There was not any delays early. > But they have appeared without any visable reason. > > What could to involve a such system behaviour? > How should I return my system to previous state? > > P.S. I will not want neither to edit the /etc/hosts file nor create > and maintain dns-zones for the internal hosts. I don't see any changes to the tcpwrappers services. Check resolv.conf; maybe one of the listed nameservers is down or unresponsive? You really should have machines in DNS or /etc/hosts, but if you don't want to maintain that, then you suffer the consequences. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 04:03:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B922116A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 04:03:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [204.152.187.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D2A43D58 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 04:03:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mark_Andrews@isc.org) Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0139A82B for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 04:03:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org) Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5O43L6O097508; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:03:21 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org) Message-Id: <200406240403.i5O43L6O097508@drugs.dv.isc.org> To: Doug White From: Mark Andrews In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:41:07 MST." <20040623203701.L92305@carver.gumbysoft.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:03:21 +1000 Sender: Mark_Andrews@isc.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Annoying delays appeared while connecting to the server X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 04:03:27 -0000 > On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Illia Baidakov wrote: > > > Hello freebsd-stable, > > > > I noticed it about a week ago. My local hosts have suffering > > such delays while connecting to the (imho) tcp-wrapped services, > > namely ssh, smtp, mysql. > > It looks like the addresses to names resolving. I don't need to resolve m > y > > local names or addresses now. There was not any delays early. > > But they have appeared without any visable reason. > > > > What could to involve a such system behaviour? > > How should I return my system to previous state? > > > > P.S. I will not want neither to edit the /etc/hosts file nor create > > and maintain dns-zones for the internal hosts. > > I don't see any changes to the tcpwrappers services. Check resolv.conf; > maybe one of the listed nameservers is down or unresponsive? > > You really should have machines in DNS or /etc/hosts, but if you don't > want to maintain that, then you suffer the consequences. He is also in violation of RFC 1918. You don't have to populate the reverse zone. A empty zone (SOA and NS records only) will prevent the queries leaking and improve response times. Why should the rest of the world have to fork out real money to run nameservers to sink these bogus queries? Mark > -- > Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve > dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 05:59:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8C316A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 05:59:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kiku.netforest.co.jp (kiku.netforest.co.jp [218.45.16.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA87443D45 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 05:59:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ueda@netforest.ad.jp) Received: (qmail 54235 invoked by uid 0); 24 Jun 2004 14:59:41 +0900 Received: from sumire.netforest.co.jp (HELO [10.0.6.191]) ([218.45.16.38]) (envelope-sender )encrypted SMTP for ; 24 Jun 2004 14:59:41 +0900 Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:59:41 +0900 From: ueda@netforest.ad.jp To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200406171653.i5HGrPPi064062@ambrisko.com> References: <20040617090559.0E7D.UEDA@netforest.ad.jp> <200406171653.i5HGrPPi064062@ambrisko.com> Message-Id: <20040624143806.9C55.UEDA@netforest.ad.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.10.03 [ja] Subject: Re: Dell PE750 w/SATA X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 05:59:47 -0000 > | > It is a Dell PE750 with: > | (snip) > | > - CERC SATA RAID Controller (6 channel) > | > | Though I have tested Dell PE750 with SATA RAID1(without SCSI) using > | FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p8, the installer could not find the disk :-(. (snip) > Scott added the PCI device ID's to -current atleast. I have a bunch of > the CERC SATA cards around here but haven't recently tested them recently. > We went with my SATA/ata-raid patches and skipped the CERC card. > > Doug A. Thanks Doug A. I have tried same machine with 5.2-CURRENT-20040623-JPSNAP.iso which can be obtained from http://snapshots.jp.freebsd.org/. Installer can recognize SATA RAID1 drive as aacd0 :-). A few steps were processed without any error but installer stopped after following message: Making a new root filesystem on /dev/aacd0s1a With "ALT-F2", I saw some messages which was ended with the following line: Entropy device is blocking. Dance fandango on keyboard to unblock. But I cannot install to Dell PowerEdge 750 SCSI RAID1(PERC 4/SC) with same ISO image, too. So there may be some problem which is not related with SATA. I hope it will be fixed on FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE :-). ----- UEDA Hiroyuki Net Forest Inc., JAPAN From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 08:25:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A97C16A4CF for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:25:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from robbins.dropbear.id.au (043.a.008.mel.iprimus.net.au [210.50.86.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6304A43D1D for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:25:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au) Received: by robbins.dropbear.id.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4160F41F5; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:17:08 +1000 (EST) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 16:17:08 +1000 From: Tim Robbins To: "Oldach, Helge" Message-ID: <20040623061708.GA2259@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: 'Pawel Malachowski' cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nullfs in 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:25:02 -0000 On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 01:14:47AM +0200, Oldach, Helge wrote: > > From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Pawel Malachowski > > On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 04:46:01PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > > Many *are* using it in 4 quite effectively ... those that tout it as > being > > > 'broken' all the time are those that are either trying to do something > > > that is known to cause problems (ie. FIFOs) > > > > I guess it is hard to do this with nullfs mounted ro (like kern/63662). > > Yes, and tjr@ also had compiled some nullfs fixes some time ago which > didn't yet get committed: http://people.freebsd.org/~tjr/nullfs-4.diff. Tim > said > he would want to "check some things first" but probably got distracted. It was a combination of disk failure on my RELENG_4 machine, getting distracted, and generally not having a lot of time to work on FreeBSD. The patch should still apply cleanly to -stable (little has changed in nullfs since I generated it), but it's unlikely that I'll get around to committing it. (I encourage any interested committer to test it & commit it, though.) Tim From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 12:06:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CE516A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:06:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from jk.homeunix.net (dhcp-19-33.dsl.CSUChico.EDU [132.241.19.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F8843D64 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:06:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jk@jk.homeunix.net) Received: from jk.homeunix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jk.homeunix.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5OC4o6b000331 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 24 Jun 2004 05:04:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from warlock@localhost) by jk.homeunix.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5OC4or1000112; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 05:04:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 05:04:50 -0700 From: John Kennedy To: ueda@netforest.ad.jp Message-ID: <20040624120450.GA87979@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> References: <20040617090559.0E7D.UEDA@netforest.ad.jp> <200406171653.i5HGrPPi064062@ambrisko.com> <20040624143806.9C55.UEDA@netforest.ad.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040624143806.9C55.UEDA@netforest.ad.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-jk-MailScanner: No infection found X-jk-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.9, required 6, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90) X-jk-MailScanner-From: warlock@jk.homeunix.net cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dell PE750 w/SATA X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:06:29 -0000 On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 02:59:41PM +0900, ueda@netforest.ad.jp wrote: > I have tried same machine with 5.2-CURRENT-20040623-JPSNAP.iso ... > Installer can recognize SATA RAID1 drive as aacd0 :-). ... but > installer stopped after following message: > > Making a new root filesystem on /dev/aacd0s1a ... > Entropy device is blocking. Dance fandango on keyboard to unblock. If you go digging through the archives here (possibly under the freebsd-current mailing list), you'll find a lot of talk about the chicken-n-egg situation with startup entropy. I'm not running -CURRENT so I don't have personal experience, but I remember people being in your situation and finding ways around it. Note the message through -- it looks like it is blocking on lack of entropy, and one of the sources for that is keyboard interrupts. If you typed on the keyboard for a while you would probably generate enough entropy to get the install going again. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 12:20:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5245E16A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:20:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from nbh-gw.newchem.ru (platan.newchem.ru [81.3.149.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065A643D66 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:20:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illich@newchem.ru) Received: from ash.nbh.newchem.ru ([192.168.204.4]) by nbh-gw.newchem.ru (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5OCJfUG024533; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:19:41 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from illich@newchem.ru) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:19:41 +0400 From: Illia Baidakov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62q) Personal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <5210358138.20040624161941@newchem.ru> To: Mark Andrews In-Reply-To: <200406240403.i5O43L6O097508@drugs.dv.isc.org> References: <200406240403.i5O43L6O097508@drugs.dv.isc.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter 1.1-beta; AVE 6.25.0.62; VDF 6.25.0.94 (host: nbh-gw.newchem.ru) cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: Annoying delays appeared while connecting to the server X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Illia Baidakov List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:20:40 -0000 Hello Mark, Thursday, June 24, 2004, 8:03:21 AM, you wrote: >> On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Illia Baidakov wrote: >> >> > Hello freebsd-stable, >> > >> > I noticed it about a week ago. My local hosts have suffering >> > such delays while connecting to the (imho) tcp-wrapped services, >> > namely ssh, smtp, mysql. >> > It looks like the addresses to names resolving. I don't need to resolve m >> y >> > local names or addresses now. There was not any delays early. >> > But they have appeared without any visable reason. >> > >> > What could to involve a such system behaviour? >> > How should I return my system to previous state? >> > >> > P.S. I will not want neither to edit the /etc/hosts file nor create >> > and maintain dns-zones for the internal hosts. >> >> I don't see any changes to the tcpwrappers services. Check resolv.conf; >> maybe one of the listed nameservers is down or unresponsive? >> My 127.0.0.1 nameserver is up, partially at the connection starting time. >> You really should have machines in DNS or /etc/hosts, but if you don't >> want to maintain that, then you suffer the consequences. MA> He is also in violation of RFC 1918. You don't have to In which part of it? MA> populate the reverse zone. A empty zone (SOA and NS records MA> only) will prevent the queries leaking and improve response MA> times. Yes, it has solved my problem. MA> Why should the rest of the world have to fork out real money MA> to run nameservers to sink these bogus queries? Now I'm going to meet how does a name resolving in the in-addr.arpa goes on. Thank you. -- Illia Baidakov. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 12:49:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4DA16A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:49:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kiku.netforest.co.jp (kiku.netforest.co.jp [218.45.16.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78CC43D45 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:49:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ueda@netforest.ad.jp) Received: (qmail 44867 invoked by uid 0); 24 Jun 2004 21:48:15 +0900 Received: from sumire.netforest.co.jp (HELO [10.0.6.191]) ([218.45.16.38]) (envelope-sender )encrypted SMTP for ; 24 Jun 2004 21:48:14 +0900 Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 21:48:14 +0900 From: UEDA Hiroyuki To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20040624120450.GA87979@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> References: <20040624143806.9C55.UEDA@netforest.ad.jp> <20040624120450.GA87979@memnoch.jk.homeunix.net> Message-Id: <20040624213552.9C65.UEDA@netforest.ad.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.10.03 [ja] Subject: Re: Dell PE750 w/SATA X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 12:49:10 -0000 > > Making a new root filesystem on /dev/aacd0s1a ... > > Entropy device is blocking. Dance fandango on keyboard to unblock. > > If you go digging through the archives here (possibly under the > freebsd-current mailing list), you'll find a lot of talk about the > chicken-n-egg situation with startup entropy. I'm not running -CURRENT so I didn't know such a thing... Study hard, me :p). > Note the message through -- it looks like it is blocking on lack of > entropy, and one of the sources for that is keyboard interrupts. If you > typed on the keyboard for a while you would probably generate enough > entropy to get the install going again. Yes! After typing many keys, I can install 5.2-CURRENT-20040623-JPSNAP.iso :-). dmesg is following: ----- Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT-20040623-JPSNAP #0: Wed Jun 23 02:05:12 GMT 2004 root@ushi.jp.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC WARNING: WITNESS option enabled, expect reduced performance. Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc09fb000. Preloaded elf module "/boot/kernel/acpi.ko" at 0xc09fb26c. ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.20GHz (3200.13-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf29 Stepping = 9 Features=0xbfebfbff Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs real memory = 1073479680 (1023 MB) avail memory = 1041027072 (992 MB) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0: Changing APIC ID to 2 ioapic1: Changing APIC ID to 3 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard random: Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pcibios: BIOS version 2.10 acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 cpu1: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 3.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 em0: port 0xece0-0xecff mem 0xfe2e0000-0xfe2fffff irq 18 at device 1.0 on pci1 em0: [GIANT-LOCKED] em0: Ethernet address: 00:c0:9f:3f:28:7c em0: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A pcib2: at device 28.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 aac0: mem 0xf4000000-0xf7ffffff irq 24 at device 1.0 on pci2 aac0: [FAST] aac0: Unknown processor 100MHz, 48MB cache memory, optional battery not installed aac0: Kernel 4.1-0, Build 7028, S/N bb450f aac0: Supported Options=1097c uhci0: port 0xcce0-0xccff irq 16 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xccc0-0xccdf irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: at device 29.4 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 29.5 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 29.7 (no driver attached) pcib3: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 em1: port 0xdcc0-0xdcff mem 0xfdee0000-0xfdefffff irq 21 at device 2.0 on pci3 em1: [GIANT-LOCKED] em1: Ethernet address: 00:c0:9f:3f:28:7d em1: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A pci3: at device 14.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0xfea0-0xfeaf,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.2 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) fdc0: port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] psm0: model IntelliMouse, device ID 3 sio0 port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A orm0: