From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 20 18:08:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181E316A4CE for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 18:08:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta07-svc.ntlworld.com (mta07-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B01143D1F for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 18:08:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scott@fishballoon.org) Received: from llama.fishballoon.org ([81.104.195.124]) by mta07-svc.ntlworld.comESMTP <20040620180844.LCNB5696.mta07-svc.ntlworld.com@llama.fishballoon.org> for ; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:08:44 +0100 Received: from tuatara.fishballoon.org ([192.168.1.6]) by llama.fishballoon.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1Bc6k1-000P3w-RF for freebsd-standards@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:08:29 +0100 Received: (from scott@localhost) by tuatara.fishballoon.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5KI8T9p076757 for freebsd-standards@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:08:29 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from scott) Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:08:29 +0100 From: Scott Mitchell To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040620180829.GJ462@tuatara.fishballoon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-PRERELEASE i386 Subject: /bin/ls -t and nanoseconds X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 18:08:31 -0000 Hello standards gurus, With regard to this thread on -hackers: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2004-June/007278.html Does POSIX have anything to say about whether or not '/bin/ls -t' should pay attention to the nanoseconds part of the file timestamps? It doesn't right now, and my feeling is that if it did, we'd want some option to display the nanos, so you could see how a particular sort order was arrived at. The free online version of IEEE Std 1003.1 is silent on this matter (it also doesn't mention our -T option), but I guess you guys have access to more documentation than I do? Cheers, Scott -- =========================================================================== Scott Mitchell | PGP Key ID | "Eagles may soar, but weasels Cambridge, England | 0x54B171B9 | don't get sucked into jet engines" scott at fishballoon.org | 0xAA775B8B | -- Anon From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 21 11:02:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36D816A4D1 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:02:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6EE843D1F for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:02:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5LB20gb064721 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:02:00 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5LB1xXJ064708 for freebsd-standards@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:01:59 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:01:59 GMT Message-Id: <200406211101.i5LB1xXJ064708@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 11:02:15 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- s [2001/01/24] misc/24590 standards timezone function not compatible witn Sin o [2001/03/05] bin/25542 standards /bin/sh: null char in quoted string o [2002/02/25] bin/35307 standards standard include files are not standard c o [2003/03/05] bin/48958 standards The type 'bool' has different sizes for C o [2003/04/21] standards/51209standards [PATCH] add a64l()/l64a/l64a_r functions p [2003/06/05] standards/52972standards /bin/sh arithmetic not POSIX compliant o [2003/07/12] standards/54410standards one-true-awk not POSIX compliant (no exte o [2003/09/15] standards/56906standards Several math(3) functions fail to set err o [2004/01/01] standards/60772standards _Bool and bool should be unsigned 9 problems total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f [1995/01/11] i386/105 standards Distributed libm (msun) has non-standard o [2000/09/24] bin/21519 standards sys/dir.h should be deprecated some more o [2001/01/16] bin/24390 standards Replacing old dir-symlinks when using /bi s [2001/06/18] kern/28260 standards UIO_MAXIOV needs to be made public o [2001/11/20] standards/32126standards getopt(3) not Unix-98 conformant s [2002/03/19] standards/36076standards Implementation of POSIX fuser command o [2002/06/14] standards/39256standards [v]snprintf aren't POSIX-conformant for s o [2002/07/09] misc/40378 standards stdlib.h gives needless warnings with -an p [2002/08/12] standards/41576standards POSIX compliance of ln(1) o [2002/10/23] standards/44425standards getcwd() succeeds even if current dir has o [2002/12/09] standards/46119standards Priority problems for SCHED_OTHER using p o [2002/12/23] standards/46504standards Warnings in headers o [2003/06/22] standards/53613standards FreeBSD doesn't define EPROTO o [2003/07/24] standards/54809standards pcvt deficits o [2003/07/25] standards/54833standards more pcvt deficits o [2003/07/25] standards/54839standards pcvt deficits o [2003/07/31] standards/55112standards glob.h, glob_t's gl_pathc should be "size o [2003/09/05] standards/56476standards cd9660 unicode support simple hack o [2003/10/12] standards/57911standards fnmatch ("[[:alpha:]]","x", FNM_PATHNAME) o [2003/10/29] standards/58676standards grantpt(3) alters storage used by ptsname p [2003/12/26] standards/60597standards FreeBSD's /usr/include lacks of cpio.h s [2004/02/14] standards/62858standards malloc(0) not C99 compliant p [2004/02/21] standards/63173standards Patch to add getopt_long_only(3) to libc o [2004/05/07] standards/66357standards make POSIX conformance problem ('sh -e' & o [2004/05/11] standards/66531standards _gettemp uses a far smaller set of filena 25 problems total. From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 21 18:20:07 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B0B516A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:20:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [128.30.28.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE21B43D41 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:20:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i5LIJkkP049157 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK CN=khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu issuer=SSL+20Client+20CA); Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:19:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id i5LIJk93049154; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:19:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:19:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200406211819.i5LIJk93049154@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Scott Mitchell In-Reply-To: <20040620180829.GJ462@tuatara.fishballoon.org> References: <20040620180829.GJ462@tuatara.fishballoon.org> X-Spam-Score: -19.8 () IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37 cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: /bin/ls -t and nanoseconds X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:20:07 -0000 < said: > Does POSIX have anything to say about whether or not '/bin/ls -t' should > pay attention to the nanoseconds part of the file timestamps? POSIX doesn't have anything to say about file timestamps having nanoseconds parts. -GAWollman From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 11:36:45 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599BE16A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:36:45 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d162.mplik.ru (relay1.mplik.ru [212.23.64.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B64843D53 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:36:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ngl@ur.ru) Received: from d162.mplik.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 8936D8D2E5C for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:36:38 +0600 (YEKST) Received: from spirit (wall.mplik.ru [195.58.1.141]) by d162.mplik.ru (Postfix) with SMTP id B365F8D33E8 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:36:23 +0600 (YEKST) Message-ID: <047b01c4584d$262017a0$8501a8c0@spirit> From: "ngl" To: Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 17:36:23 +0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0 X-Spam-Status: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000630, version=0.12.3 X-Sagator-Scanner: 0.4.9-0rc1; drop(clamd()) deliver(BogoFilter()) Subject: EXPORT_SYMS X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:36:45 -0000 In KLD module makefile i can specify EXPORT_SYMS= name1, name2, ... What does it mean ? From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 15:44:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8487216A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:44:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D5943D55 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:44:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5MFnslF044186 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:49:56 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i5MFiB7t047479; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:44:11 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:44:11 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: ngl Message-ID: <20040622154411.GA47418@ip.net.ua> References: <047b01c4584d$262017a0$8501a8c0@spirit> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <047b01c4584d$262017a0$8501a8c0@spirit> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: EXPORT_SYMS X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 15:44:01 -0000 --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 05:36:23PM +0600, ngl wrote: > In KLD module makefile i can specify=20 > EXPORT_SYMS=3D name1, name2, ... > What does it mean ? >=20 According to sys/conf/kmod.mk: # EXPORT_SYMS A list of symbols that should be exported from the module, # or the name of a file containing a list of symbols, or YES # to export all symbols. If not defined, no symbols are # exported. This is used to avoid possible name conflicts between different modules. All symbols that aren't exported (none are exported by default) will be made local by objcopy(1). In the past, two different modules could define a common global name, and resolution of a name could give unpredictable results, often resulting in a panic. Note: if module A depends on symbol S from module B, and the dependency of A on B is recorded, S should *not* be global. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --ibTvN161/egqYuK8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA2FPLqRfpzJluFF4RAt6dAJ9CO6b/3pFngm3uHwZ8ts5BcD9SBQCdEjfn Qj1mvwEwJht5OvtFBR42AZ8= =jBHW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ibTvN161/egqYuK8-- From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 22 21:07:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C93916A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 21:07:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta10-svc.ntlworld.com (mta10-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC8443D45 for ; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 21:07:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scott@fishballoon.org) Received: from llama.fishballoon.org ([81.104.195.124]) by mta10-svc.ntlworld.comESMTP <20040622210557.EWKH29369.mta10-svc.ntlworld.com@llama.fishballoon.org>; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:05:57 +0100 Received: from tuatara.fishballoon.org ([192.168.1.6]) by llama.fishballoon.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1BcsTm-0008MP-VO; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:06:57 +0100 Received: (from scott@localhost) by tuatara.fishballoon.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5ML6rAd000665; Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:06:53 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from scott) Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:06:53 +0100 From: Scott Mitchell To: Garrett Wollman Message-ID: <20040622210653.GB461@tuatara.fishballoon.org> References: <20040620180829.GJ462@tuatara.fishballoon.org> <200406211819.i5LIJk93049154@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406211819.i5LIJk93049154@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE i386 cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /bin/ls -t and nanoseconds X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 21:07:26 -0000 On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 02:19:46PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > < said: > > > Does POSIX have anything to say about whether or not '/bin/ls -t' should > > pay attention to the nanoseconds part of the file timestamps? > > POSIX doesn't have anything to say about file timestamps having > nanoseconds parts. Thanks. Our ls now sorts timestamps down to the nanosecond level and does a secondary sort by name when timestamps are equal. Scott -- =========================================================================== Scott Mitchell | PGP Key ID | "Eagles may soar, but weasels Cambridge, England | 0x54B171B9 | don't get sucked into jet engines" scott at fishballoon.org | 0xAA775B8B | -- Anon From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 06:09:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31DE16A4CE; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 06:09:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d162.mplik.ru (relay1.mplik.ru [212.23.64.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B7BB643D1F; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 06:09:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ngl@ur.ru) Received: from d162.mplik.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 0009D8D6D38; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:08:37 +0600 (YEKST) Received: from spirit (wall.mplik.ru [195.58.1.141]) by d162.mplik.ru (Postfix) with SMTP id ACF838D6DBB; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:08:37 +0600 (YEKST) Message-ID: <008d01c458e8$8610ee50$8501a8c0@spirit> From: "ngl" To: "Ruslan Ermilov" References: <047b01c4584d$262017a0$8501a8c0@spirit> <20040622154411.GA47418@ip.net.ua> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:08:37 +0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.0 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0 X-Spam-Status: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.101993, version=0.12.3 X-Sagator-Scanner: 0.4.9-0rc1; drop(clamd()) deliver(BogoFilter()) cc: freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: EXPORT_SYMS X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 06:09:16 -0000 What about symbols contains in kernel module, are they allways exported ? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ruslan Ermilov" To: "ngl" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 9:44 PM Subject: Re: EXPORT_SYMS From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 23 06:19:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E6416A4CE; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 06:19:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 259C943D1D; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 06:19:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5N6Poj1005407 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:25:52 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) id i5N6K4lO001447; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:20:04 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:20:04 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: ngl Message-ID: <20040623062004.GB1289@ip.net.ua> Mail-Followup-To: current@FreeBSD.org References: <047b01c4584d$262017a0$8501a8c0@spirit> <20040622154411.GA47418@ip.net.ua> <008d01c458e8$8610ee50$8501a8c0@spirit> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <008d01c458e8$8610ee50$8501a8c0@spirit> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: EXPORT_SYMS X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 06:19:52 -0000 --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 12:08:37PM +0600, ngl wrote: > What about symbols contains in kernel module, are they allways exported= ? >=20 Yes, but debugging symbols are (normally) stripped. P.S. freebsd-standards@ is the wrong list to discuss this. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFA2SEUqRfpzJluFF4RAun3AJ9DivM9thqoOo/zGdbOnr4yw1mMhwCfa03f HMkZdiAMOb1pkQ+OmveXSDQ= =w5PX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9NhX3UHpAaciwkO-- From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 24 14:36:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B64516A4CE; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:36:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7419D43D64; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:36:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i5OEZg3u026144; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:35:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:35:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com To: David Xu In-Reply-To: <40DA9C68.5010202@freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PTHREAD_STACK_MIN X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: deischen@freebsd.org List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:36:08 -0000 [ standards CC'd ] Can you guys tell what we should do to change PTHREAD_STACK_MIN in from hardcoded 1024 to MINSIGSTKSZ? On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, David Xu wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, David Xu wrote: > > > > > >>I want to change minimal stack size to MINISIGSTKSZ, > >>do you think it is ok ? > > > > > > Sure, I don't see a problem with it.... > > > Sadly, MINSIGSTKSZ is quoted by #if __XSI_VISIBLE macro, > will it be a problem ? see /usr/include/machine/signal.h. Hmm, I guess we'd have to define _X_OPEN_SOURCE in order to see that. I'll CC standards to see what they say. -- Dan Eischen