From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 5 02:23:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B052A16A41C for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 02:23:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E52343D49 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 02:23:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j552NXSB033117; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 19:23:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j552NX1K033109; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 19:23:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 19:23:33 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Francisco Reyes Message-ID: <20050605022333.GA26993@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <20050604163642.O67665@zoraida.natserv.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050604163642.O67665@zoraida.natserv.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List Subject: Re: AMD64 Disc 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 02:23:34 -0000 On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 06:19:23PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Although my first attempt at installing AMD64 failed because the vendor > sent me the wrong motherboard I was wondering.. does the AMD64 install > looks any different than the i386? Not really - during the installation they both use sysinstall. If you mount disc1 and look at the contents they will also be about the same. You can extract a file from "base" and then file(1) it to determine which platform a CD is for. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 5 03:03:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B52116A41C for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 03:03:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC29C43D1D for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 03:02:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5539HxP043037; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 21:09:17 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <42A26B22.9040206@samsco.org> Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 21:01:54 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050218 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org References: <20050604163642.O67665@zoraida.natserv.net> <20050605022333.GA26993@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <20050605022333.GA26993@dragon.NUXI.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: Subject: Re: AMD64 Disc 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 03:03:01 -0000 David O'Brien wrote: > On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 06:19:23PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote: > >>Although my first attempt at installing AMD64 failed because the vendor >>sent me the wrong motherboard I was wondering.. does the AMD64 install >>looks any different than the i386? > > > Not really - during the installation they both use sysinstall. If you > mount disc1 and look at the contents they will also be about the same. > > You can extract a file from "base" and then file(1) it to determine which > platform a CD is for. > /boot/kernel/kernel on the CD will also be distinguishable, as will /stand/sysinstall. Scott From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 5 03:24:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58ECA16A41C for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 03:24:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joseph.koshy@gmail.com) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D0743D48 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 03:24:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joseph.koshy@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so1432543rne for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2005 20:24:26 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ej3wq6o9glBxl4rU0dRVrWSyHclrE9+6PdZDxqg5py3vTR6efNLOYJJfgT8GoF5QfqB+5n7JR2T1nOxze8a8/4VFH/Mrz8+f5V3mAuauvxgAq30aFQwoMKUwisXyT399KB52pvkodUxNflSMZmIMDTLglCIqZMobSB/fxR18sqY= Received: by 10.38.88.3 with SMTP id l3mr1744532rnb; Sat, 04 Jun 2005 20:24:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.209.31 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 20:24:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <84dead7205060420245b15db34@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:54:26 +0530 From: Joseph Koshy To: Scott Long , Francisco Reyes In-Reply-To: <42A26B22.9040206@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050604163642.O67665@zoraida.natserv.net> <20050605022333.GA26993@dragon.NUXI.org> <42A26B22.9040206@samsco.org> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 Disc 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Joseph Koshy List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 03:24:27 -0000 > /boot/kernel/kernel on the CD will also be distinguishable, as will > /stand/sysinstall. File "RELNOTES.TXT" on the CD should spell out the architecture the CD is for too. --=20 FreeBSD Volunteer, http://people.freebsd.org/~jkoshy From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 5 03:39:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3801816A41C for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 03:39:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBDE943D48 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 03:39:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j553d9Hp023967; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 23:39:09 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 23:39:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Joseph Koshy In-Reply-To: <84dead7205060420245b15db34@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20050604233701.E69694@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20050604163642.O67665@zoraida.natserv.net> <20050605022333.GA26993@dragon.NUXI.org> <42A26B22.9040206@samsco.org> <84dead7205060420245b15db34@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 Disc 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 03:39:13 -0000 On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Joseph Koshy wrote: > File "RELNOTES.TXT" on the CD should spell out the architecture > the CD is for too. Thanks. I see it. The CD I thought was AMD64 IS AMD64. :-) It sure would be helpfull if sysinstall would say something on top to the regard of which architecture it is. :-) In theory one could put the wrong CD and spend some time installing before realising the wrong one got installed. How about after installation? uname -a? I see a "i386" all the way at the end. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 5 03:42:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5AD016A41C for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 03:42:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E7643D48 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 03:42:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j553gKNH024435; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 23:42:20 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 23:42:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <42A26B22.9040206@samsco.org> Message-ID: <20050604234044.F69694@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20050604163642.O67665@zoraida.natserv.net> <20050605022333.GA26993@dragon.NUXI.org> <42A26B22.9040206@samsco.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 Disc 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 03:42:23 -0000 On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Scott Long wrote: > /boot/kernel/kernel Hm.. that doesn't seem to help. I just confirmed this CD is AMD64 and "file kernel" doesn't say AMD64 anyhere.. #file kernel kernel: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), not stripped > as will /stand/sysinstall. That after the install? So far /cdrom/RELNOTES.TXT seems the better method. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 5 03:45:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CC216A41C for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 03:45:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4BB43D48 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 03:45:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j553jJxO025243 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 23:45:19 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 23:45:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: FreeBSD amd64 List Message-ID: <20050604234246.G69694@zoraida.natserv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Which motherboard for RAID in AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 03:45:20 -0000 Although I see a list of motherboards at the freebsd site I don't see any notes about working RAID controllers. Anyone can confirm any of the motherboards on the list that it's controller's RAID is supported under FBSD-AMD64? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 5 05:49:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FF1A16A41C for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 05:49:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mr.skoe@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77A643D48 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 05:49:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mr.skoe@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 12so166940nzp for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2005 22:49:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=J46hW7nhizgiXcrsbWyzuTjvbumoaOlF+67Far+J8a10BV+vxTk/plb6q34cvPCN1VjoXGILLqzX0bn1lz6j0B/mH58WYPpvlOYyKd7f7CcK+y3kwSHPd231d4Ku96bIHkHXQlXNInkwa53Xvzlol6h/sNUonMOrbIR4l+8dHPY= Received: by 10.36.8.10 with SMTP id 10mr19117nzh; Sat, 04 Jun 2005 22:49:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.5.2 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 22:49:03 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 15:49:03 +1000 From: Mathew Schofield To: Francisco Reyes , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050604234246.G69694@zoraida.natserv.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050604234246.G69694@zoraida.natserv.net> Cc: Subject: Re: Which motherboard for RAID in AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mathew Schofield List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 05:49:04 -0000 > Anyone can confirm any of the motherboards on the list that it's > controller's RAID is supported under FBSD-AMD64? I have an A8V Deluxe mobo which has the Promise 20378 Controller and the VIA K8T800Pro chipset. The VIA works perfectly with fBSD/AMD64 5.4-RELEASE and my 200GB Maxtor, but the Promise controller went wierd on me! (There were two drives in the drive selection menu, ad4 and something else even though i only had one harddrive). I never done anything about the Promise controller because disabling it and using VIA reduces the boot time by about 8-9 seconds. I can't say for -CURRENT though. --=20 This is a private letter and only the intended people may read this message. You may not store, quote or publish this document for any purposes. The data/information held within this message are for private use, and no one may disclose it. There are no guarentees that the information disclosed is accurate, or that the links/attached files will not be contaminated with Viruses. You use all links, and all attachments, at your own free will and thus risk. You have been warned. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 5 05:53:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DCFD16A41C for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 05:53:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D331343D48 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 05:52:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1Deo45-000JUg-M1; Sun, 05 Jun 2005 08:52:53 +0300 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Francisco Reyes In-Reply-To: Message from Francisco Reyes of "Sat, 04 Jun 2005 23:42:20 EDT." <20050604234044.F69694@zoraida.natserv.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 08:52:53 +0300 From: Danny Braniss Message-ID: Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 Disc 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 05:53:00 -0000 > On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Scott Long wrote: > > > /boot/kernel/kernel > > Hm.. that doesn't seem to help. I just confirmed this CD is AMD64 and > "file kernel" doesn't say AMD64 anyhere.. > > #file kernel > kernel: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), ********** mine says: kernel: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 ... so my guess you do have the wrong CD ... danny From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 5 06:05:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EDD16A41C for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 06:05:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EF343D49 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 06:05:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1DeoG1-000JjI-ST; Sun, 05 Jun 2005 09:05:13 +0300 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Francisco Reyes In-Reply-To: Message from Danny Braniss of "Sun, 05 Jun 2005 08:52:53 +0300." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 09:05:13 +0300 From: Danny Braniss Message-ID: Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 Disc 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 06:05:15 -0000 > > On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Scott Long wrote: > > > > > /boot/kernel/kernel > > > > Hm.. that doesn't seem to help. I just confirmed this CD is AMD64 and > > "file kernel" doesn't say AMD64 anyhere.. > > > > #file kernel > > kernel: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), > ********** > mine says: > kernel: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 ... > > so my guess you do have the wrong CD ... sorry, this didn't come out as intended. (never do anything before morning coffee :-) by 'mine', i wanted to mean my kernel, not my CD. So the problem might be in the CD! danny From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 5 07:50:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81C816A41C for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 07:50:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from groot@kde.org) Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A16143D1F for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 07:50:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from groot@kde.org) Received: from odin.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.33] (helo=localhost.englishbreakfastnetwork.org) by pandora.cs.kun.nl (8.12.10/5.2) with ESMTP id j557nxxS005656; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 09:49:59 +0200 (MEST) From: Adriaan de Groot To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 09:49:54 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.50 References: <20050604234246.G69694@zoraida.natserv.net> In-Reply-To: <20050604234246.G69694@zoraida.natserv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506050949.54551.groot@kde.org> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 131.174.33.4 Cc: Subject: Re: Which motherboard for RAID in AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 07:50:05 -0000 On Sunday 05 June 2005 05:45, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Although I see a list of motherboards at the freebsd site I don't see any > notes about working RAID controllers. > > Anyone can confirm any of the motherboards on the list that it's > controller's RAID is supported under FBSD-AMD64? Via KT800's embedded RAID which shows up as atapci1: works as a RAID controller; configure the RAID array before installation and use ar0 as the device to install FreeBSD to. Promise 20378 RAID which shows up as atapci0: works as a RAID controller; same deal. My K8V has both of these controllers, my Gigabyte board only the VIA. Both seem to work fine at least in a mirroring setup. I've experimented with moving the array from one controller to another (ie. powerdown, disconnect both drives from Promise, reconnet to via, power up) and that worked at least once. Similarly, disconnecting a single drive retains functionality, though the array is marked as degraded. Sil-based RAID seems to be dead in the water in 5-stable. Some boards - notably nForce based ones - seem to come with those as RAID controllers. -- These are your friends - Adem GPG: FEA2 A3FE Adriaan de Groot From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 5 08:23:05 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B96AB16A41C for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:23:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from groot@kde.org) Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2A343D53 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:23:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from groot@kde.org) Received: from odin.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.33] (helo=localhost.englishbreakfastnetwork.org) by pandora.cs.kun.nl (8.12.10/5.2) with ESMTP id j558N2xS007307; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 10:23:03 +0200 (MEST) From: Adriaan de Groot To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, Mathew Schofield Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 10:22:57 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.50 References: <20050604234246.G69694@zoraida.natserv.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506051022.58166.groot@kde.org> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 131.174.33.4 Cc: Subject: Re: Which motherboard for RAID in AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 08:23:05 -0000 Mathew, Can we take a look at your mail signature? On Sunday 05 June 2005 07:49, Mathew Schofield wrote: > This is a private letter and only the intended people may read this > message. You may not store, quote or publish this document for any > purposes. The data/information held within this message are for > private use, and no one may disclose it. There are no guarentees that > the information disclosed is accurate, or that the links/attached > files will not be contaminated with Viruses. You use all links, and > all attachments, at your own free will and thus risk. You have been > warned. If you invented this thing, please fix the spelling error in it. Also realize that it's totally pointless to add such a warning when sending a message to _a publicly archived mailing list_. Indeed, taking the signate at face value, the only thing you allow me to do with your message is immediately delete it, since otherwise I'm storing it (and gosh, I'm quoting it in order to reply). If your employer insists on this signature, please have them fix the spelling error and realize the same. -- These are your friends - Adem GPG: FEA2 A3FE Adriaan de Groot From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 5 15:13:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696C516A41C for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 15:13:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D28F43D1F for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 15:13:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j55FCxWP003155; Sun, 5 Jun 2005 11:12:59 -0400 Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 11:12:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Danny Braniss In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20050605111145.T76432@zoraida.natserv.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 Disc 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 15:13:12 -0000 On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Danny Braniss wrote: >> #file kernel >> kernel: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), > ********** > mine says: > kernel: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, AMD x86-64, version 1 ... I did this from a i386 machine and was checking /cdrom/boot/kernel/kernel I guess this method works to check what the machine is.. > so my guess you do have the wrong CD ... The RELNOTE.TXT on the CD had AMD64 in the top most line. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 11:01:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CBF16A41C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:01:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D4643D1F for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:01:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j56B1iMx065529 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:01:44 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j56B1ix0065523 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:01:44 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:01:44 GMT Message-Id: <200506061101.j56B1ix0065523@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 11:01:45 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2004/10/27] amd64/73211 amd64 FAST_IPSEC broken on amd64 o [2005/05/28] amd64/81602 amd64 SATA crashes with parallel pcm access 2 problems total. Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/11/26] amd64/59714 amd64 device timeout and ad0: WARNING - WRITE_D o [2004/07/28] amd64/69704 amd64 ext2/ext3 unstable in amd64 o [2004/07/28] amd64/69707 amd64 IPC32 dont work OK in amd64 FreeBSD o [2004/09/07] amd64/71471 amd64 Can not install 5.3beta3/amd64 on IBM eSe o [2004/10/28] amd64/73252 amd64 ad6: WARNING - READ_DMA interrupt was see o [2004/10/30] amd64/73322 amd64 unarchiving /etc to msdos fs locks up amd o [2004/11/01] amd64/73369 amd64 on-board firewire unreliable with Asus K8 o [2004/11/07] amd64/73650 amd64 5.3-release panics on boot o [2004/11/10] amd64/73775 amd64 Kernel panic (trap 12) when booting with o [2004/11/16] amd64/74014 amd64 5.3-RELEASE-AMD64 freezes on boot during o [2004/12/05] amd64/74747 amd64 System panic on shutdown when process wil o [2004/12/18] amd64/75209 amd64 5.3-Release panics on attempted boot from o [2004/12/23] amd64/75417 amd64 ACPI: SATA Hard-disk o [2005/01/12] amd64/76136 amd64 system halts before reboot o [2005/01/17] amd64/76336 amd64 racoon/setkey -D cases instant "Fatal Tra o [2005/02/02] amd64/77011 amd64 consisten 5.3-p5 make crash on installwor o [2005/02/04] amd64/77101 amd64 Please include ULi M1689 LAN, SATA, and A o [2005/02/17] amd64/77629 amd64 aMule hardlocks AMD64 system o [2005/02/23] amd64/77949 amd64 Pb boot FreeBSD 64 o [2005/03/04] amd64/78406 amd64 [panic]AMD64 w/ SCSI: issue 'rm -r /usr/p o [2005/03/07] amd64/78558 amd64 installation o [2005/03/14] amd64/78848 amd64 sis driver on FreeBSD 5.x does not work o o [2005/04/12] amd64/79813 amd64 Will not install/run on amd64 nForce 4 pl o [2005/04/19] amd64/80114 amd64 kldload snd_ich causes interrupt storm wh o [2005/05/06] amd64/80691 amd64 amd64 kernel hangs on load a [2005/05/10] amd64/80839 amd64 RELEASE 5.4 / libc: make buildworld fails o [2005/05/14] amd64/81037 amd64 SATA problem o [2005/05/19] amd64/81272 amd64 JDK 1.5 port doesn't build. p [2005/05/19] amd64/81279 amd64 /usr/games/random returns every line o [2005/05/20] amd64/81325 amd64 KLD if_ath.ko: depends on ath_hal - not a 30 problems total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2004/01/11] amd64/61209 amd64 ppc0: cannot reserve I/O port range o [2004/02/21] amd64/63188 amd64 ti(4) broken on amd64 o [2004/07/28] amd64/69705 amd64 IPC problem (msq_queues) o [2004/07/28] amd64/69709 amd64 ACPI enabled then floppy don't work (5.2. o [2004/08/15] amd64/70500 amd64 bge driver for 3Com 3C996B on amd64 preve o [2004/12/02] amd64/74608 amd64 mpt hangs 5 minutes when booting o [2004/12/07] amd64/74811 amd64 df, nfs mount, negative Avail -> 32/64-bi o [2004/12/13] ports/75015 amd64 cvsup on amd64 with runsocks (socks5) cor o [2005/02/13] amd64/77470 amd64 Using of cyrillic filenames conversion le o [2005/03/17] amd64/78954 amd64 kerberos 5 failed to build o [2005/05/11] amd64/80885 amd64 OpenGL hardware accel dont work on FreeBS o [2005/05/16] amd64/81089 amd64 FreeBSD 5.4 released version can not use o [2005/06/03] amd64/81823 amd64 ports/astro/boinc-setiathome never compil 13 problems total. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 14:10:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42FA016A41F; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:10:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9D143D48; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:10:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j56EAHbG096431; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:10:17 GMT (envelope-from ru@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from ru@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j56EAHqi096427; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:10:17 GMT (envelope-from ru) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:10:17 GMT From: Ruslan Ermilov Message-Id: <200506061410.j56EAHqi096427@freefall.freebsd.org> To: dreug@proc.ru, ru@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org, imura@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: amd64/77470: Using of cyrillic filenames conversion leads to english filenames gabmbling X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:10:18 -0000 Synopsis: Using of cyrillic filenames conversion leads to english filenames gabmbling State-Changed-From-To: open->patched State-Changed-By: ru State-Changed-When: Mon Jun 6 14:07:14 GMT 2005 State-Changed-Why: This was fixed in 6.0-CURRENT. Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-amd64->imura Responsible-Changed-By: ru Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Jun 6 14:07:14 GMT 2005 Responsible-Changed-Why: Pending MFC. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=77470 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 14:24:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212F016A41C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:24:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC80B43D1D for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 14:24:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j56EOKlH004625 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:24:20 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 10:24:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: FreeBSD amd64 List Message-ID: <20050606102238.M86876@zoraida.natserv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 14:24:21 -0000 It seems the motheboard I got (SiI 3512 SATA150 controller) doesn't work in RAID with FBSD AMD64. Anyone got 3ware 2 port S-ATA working with their AMD64 FreeBSD? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 15:22:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D47C16A41C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:22:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from etoll@vipstructures.com) Received: from rodan.vipstructures.com (rodan.vipstructures.com [66.195.71.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4D443D1F for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:22:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from etoll@vipstructures.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.vipstructures.com [127.0.0.1]) by rodan.vipstructures.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B8E41EE83F for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:22:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mothra.vipstructures.com (mothra.vipstructures.com [192.168.1.3]) by rodan.vipstructures.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D22F41EE824 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:22:40 -0400 (EDT) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:23:00 -0400 Message-ID: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A9456E9FA@vip10-win2k.vipstructures.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? thread-index: AcVqo4MaAWRdTeZ6QNGOFL3OEauTHQABpfmw From: "Toll, Eric" To: "Francisco Reyes" Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: RE: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:22:42 -0000 =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org=20 > [mailto:owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Francisco Reyes > Sent: Monday, June 06, 2005 10:24 AM > To: FreeBSD amd64 List > Subject: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? >=20 > It seems the motheboard I got (SiI 3512 SATA150 controller)=20 > doesn't work in RAID with FBSD AMD64. >=20 > Anyone got 3ware 2 port S-ATA working with their AMD64 FreeBSD? >=20 Yep. I've got an 8005-2LP working dare I say "perfectly" with FBSD AMD64 5.4 Rel. I even am running the (newest beta) 3Ware 3DM2 web gui, and it will email me if the RAID set gets into trouble. =20 I really like it. You need a *64* Bit PCI slot to fully utilize the cards speed. Harware XOR is nice. Of course with dual opteron 242's my CPU load has been very very low. :) I stated my system build with the 3Ware controller and purchased a Gigabyte MB (GA-7A8DW) as it was listed as tested/approved on 3Wares site. Also 3Ware recommended the WD RAID edition drives, I used the WD RAID ED SATA 250Gb 7200 8Mb Cache units (2), also use the cables that come from 3Ware as they are better than average. HTH Eric From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 15:27:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE7016A41C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:27:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from etoll@vipstructures.com) Received: from rodan.vipstructures.com (rodan.vipstructures.com [66.195.71.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF8B43D1D for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 15:27:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from etoll@vipstructures.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.vipstructures.com [127.0.0.1]) by rodan.vipstructures.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE62F1EE840 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:27:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mothra.vipstructures.com (mothra.vipstructures.com [192.168.1.3]) by rodan.vipstructures.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17531EE824 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:27:10 -0400 (EDT) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 11:27:30 -0400 Message-ID: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A9456E9FB@vip10-win2k.vipstructures.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? thread-index: AcVqo4MaAWRdTeZ6QNGOFL3OEauTHQABpfmwAAB4KmA= From: "Toll, Eric" To: "Toll, Eric" , "Francisco Reyes" Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: RE: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:27:11 -0000 > Yep. I've got an 8006-2LP (not 8005-2LP) working dare I say >"perfectly" with FBSD AMD64 5.4 Rel.=20 typo corrected.=20 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 16:01:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C6516A41C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:01:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF78C43D4C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:01:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j56G1Wgw027057; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 12:01:33 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 12:01:32 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: "Toll, Eric" In-Reply-To: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A9456E9FA@vip10-win2k.vipstructures.com> Message-ID: <20050606120017.B87454@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A9456E9FA@vip10-win2k.vipstructures.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: RE: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:01:34 -0000 On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Toll, Eric wrote: > I really like it. You need a *64* Bit PCI slot to fully > utilize the cards speed. Will it work on a 32bit slot? The load on the system will be small. I just want RAID 1 for protection.. so the loss of speed because of using 32bit won't matter much. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 16:44:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3E916A41C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:44:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca) Received: from imap.sd73.bc.ca (smtp.sd73.bc.ca [142.24.13.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B261443D1D for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:44:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.sd73.bc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE97E18CCAB for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 09:44:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap.sd73.bc.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailtest.sd73.bc.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19289-01-49 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 09:44:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from s9.sbo (s9.sbo [192.168.0.9]) by imap.sd73.bc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC9B18CC91 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 09:44:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Freddie Cash Organization: School District 73 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 09:44:50 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A9456E9FA@vip10-win2k.vipstructures.com> <20050606120017.B87454@zoraida.natserv.net> In-Reply-To: <20050606120017.B87454@zoraida.natserv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506060944.51553.fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at sd73.bc.ca Subject: Re: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:44:54 -0000 On June 6, 2005 09:01 am, Francisco Reyes wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Toll, Eric wrote: > > I really like it. You need a *64* Bit PCI slot to fully > > utilize the cards speed. > Will it work on a 32bit slot? > The load on the system will be small. I just want RAID 1 for > protection.. so the loss of speed because of using 32bit won't matter > much. If the load is low, and you only want RAID1, have you considered the software RAID capabilities of ccd(4), gmirror(8), and gvium(8)? I'm using gmirror on a server at home running 2 120 GB IDE drives off a Promise PCI IDE card. Setup was simple, initial synchronisation was fairly quick (considering it's only a P2 333MHz system with 384 MB RAM), and array rebuild after pulling the cable on one drive was also fairly fast. As for running PCI-X cards (64-bit, 66/100/133 MHz) in 32-bit PCI slots, most of them will work, albeit a lot slower than they could. Depends on how the card's connector is keyed. -- Freddie Cash, CLCP CNCP Network Support / Helpdesk School District 73 (250) 377-4357 fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 16:55:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA49C16A41C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:55:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from etoll@vipstructures.com) Received: from rodan.vipstructures.com (rodan.vipstructures.com [66.195.71.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A85E43D1F for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:55:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from etoll@vipstructures.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.vipstructures.com [127.0.0.1]) by rodan.vipstructures.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1C91EE840 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 12:55:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mothra.vipstructures.com (mothra.vipstructures.com [192.168.1.3]) by rodan.vipstructures.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE801EE83F for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 12:55:08 -0400 (EDT) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 12:55:28 -0400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 Message-ID: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A9456E9FC@vip10-win2k.vipstructures.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? thread-index: AcVqsRXqgsOoqPD+TyOC9cvSTR1VhwABqeVg From: "Toll, Eric" To: "Francisco Reyes" Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: RE: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:55:09 -0000 > On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Toll, Eric wrote: >=20 > > I really like it. You need a *64* Bit PCI slot to fully > utilize the=20 > > cards speed. >=20 > Will it work on a 32bit slot? > The load on the system will be small. I just want RAID 1 for=20 > protection..=20 > so the loss of speed because of using 32bit won't matter much. Yes, it will work fine. I think I paid $148.00 USD for the card. It will still be faster than software raid. *Easy* to set up too! Alt+3 to access the 3Ware bios util at post time. Create the RAID set. Save, Boot AMD64 CD, Install FreeBSD normally, e.g. just like you would for a single disk system. Eric From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 18:50:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7BC516A41C for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 18:50:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C125D43D49 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 18:50:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j56IoQFx031683 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 18:50:26 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j56IoQiY031682; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 18:50:26 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 18:50:26 GMT Message-Id: <200506061850.j56IoQiY031682@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org From: Roland Smith Cc: Subject: Re: amd64/80885: OpenGL hardware accel dont work on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Roland Smith List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 18:50:31 -0000 The following reply was made to PR amd64/80885; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Roland Smith To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: amd64/80885: OpenGL hardware accel dont work on FreeBSD Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 20:48:03 +0200 --sgneBHv3152wZ8jf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think this bug can be closed, since OpenGL with a Radeon 9200 does work on amd64: uname -a FreeBSD slackbox.xs4all.nl 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #6: Tue May 17=20 19:19:12 CEST 2005 root@slackbox.xs4all.nl:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RFS amd64 pciconf -lv|grep -A 4 drm drm0@pci1:0:0: class=3D0x030000 card=3D0x0260174b chip=3D0x59601002 rev=3D= 0x01 hdr=3D0x00 vendor =3D 'ATI Technologies Inc' device =3D 'RV280 Radeon 9200 Pro' class =3D display subclass =3D VGA glxinfo|grep direct direct rendering: Yes Probably pilot error. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain text. public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt --sgneBHv3152wZ8jf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCpJpjEnfvsMMhpyURAgp9AKCDhLH9IRxqBK1lHIsxkMAG+jBR7QCfT9aP nIvKC96oPklZB7iowX7tJog= =r+m8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sgneBHv3152wZ8jf-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 19:00:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA8D16A420 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 19:00:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6729D43D64 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 19:00:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j56J0l1B032085 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 19:00:47 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j56J0ljk032084; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 19:00:47 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 19:00:47 GMT Message-Id: <200506061900.j56J0ljk032084@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org From: Roland Smith Cc: Subject: Re: amd64/81823: ports/astro/boinc-setiathome never compiled... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Roland Smith List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 19:00:57 -0000 The following reply was made to PR amd64/81823; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Roland Smith To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: amd64/81823: ports/astro/boinc-setiathome never compiled... Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 20:53:25 +0200 --brEuL7wsLY8+TuWz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Can someone close this bug? The description is faulty, since it it boinc-client that fails. With an updated ports tree it compiles and runs fine here. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain text. public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt --brEuL7wsLY8+TuWz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCpJulEnfvsMMhpyURAp0ZAJ9+Z/+bsnor+W30b7d4k9k6MPN4nQCgj9XR GmlVlKdS9L7PaonPm4pbdGA= =3E8d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --brEuL7wsLY8+TuWz-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 7 00:25:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC9E16A41C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:25:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Peter_Losher@isc.org) Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [204.152.187.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF07743D1F for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:25:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Peter_Losher@isc.org) Received: from dalek.isc.org (dalek.isc.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:bb::73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F64677EF; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:25:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Peter_Losher@isc.org) From: Peter Losher Organization: ISC To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 17:24:58 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506061725.01411.Peter_Losher@isc.org> Subject: Unable to run mergemaster on 5.4-REL/amd64 system X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 00:25:31 -0000 Halfway thru populating /var/tmp/temproot/, install throws up a fatal error, anyone else seen this? (The two amd64 systems I tested on have fresh (as of 10 days ago) 5.4 installs. -=- # mergemaster [...] cd /usr/src/etc/mtree; install -o root -g wheel -m 444 BSD.include.dist BSD.local.dist BSD.root.dist BSD.usr.dist BSD.var.dist BSD.x11.dist BSD.x11-4.dist BIND.chroot.dist /var/tmp/temproot/etc/mtree cd /usr/src/etc/namedb; install -o root -g wheel -m 644 PROTO.localhost.rev PROTO.localhost-v6.rev named.conf named.root make-localhost /var/tmp/temproot/var/named/etc/namedb install: wrong number or types of arguments usage: install [-bCcpSsv] [-B suffix] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] file1 file2 install [-bCcpSsv] [-B suffix] [-f flags] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] file1 ... fileN directory install -d [-v] [-g group] [-m mode] [-o owner] directory ... *** Error code 64 Stop in /usr/src/etc. *** FATAL ERROR: Cannot 'cd' to /usr/src/etc and install files to the temproot environment -=- -Peter -- Peter_Losher@isc.org | ISC | OpenPGP 0xE8048D08 | "The bits must flow" From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 7 03:07:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8D416A41C; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 03:07:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smarthost2.sentex.ca (smarthost2.sentex.ca [205.211.164.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463D943D1D; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 03:07:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp2.sentex.ca (smtp2.sentex.ca [199.212.134.9]) by smarthost2.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5735S4Z031642; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 23:05:28 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by smtp2.sentex.ca (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5737pWK033541; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 23:07:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id 0375D7306E; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 23:07:50 -0400 (EDT) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20050607030750.0375D7306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 23:07:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.84, clamav-milter version 0.84e on clamscanner3 X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 205.211.164.50 Cc: Subject: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 03:07:52 -0000 TB --- 2005-06-07 02:32:25 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2005-06-07 02:32:25 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2005-06-07 02:32:25 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2005-06-07 02:32:59 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2005-06-07 02:32:59 - cd /home/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 TB --- 2005-06-07 02:32:59 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2005-06-07 02:39:07 - building world (CFLAGS=-O2 -pipe) TB --- 2005-06-07 02:39:07 - cd /home/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2005-06-07 02:39:07 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Building an up-to-date make(1) >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries [...] ===> lib/libpam/modules/pam_self (all) cc -fpic -DPIC -O2 -pipe -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_self/../../../../contrib/openpam/include -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_self/../../libpam -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunused-parameter -Wno-uninitialized -c /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_self/pam_self.c -o pam_self.So building shared library pam_self.so.2 ===> lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh (all) cc -fpic -DPIC -O2 -pipe -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/../../../../crypto/openssh -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/../../../../contrib/openpam/include -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/../../libpam -c /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/pam_ssh.c -o pam_ssh.So building shared library pam_ssh.so.2 /home/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/../../../../secure/lib/libssh/libssh.a(authfile.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/../../../../secure/lib/libssh/libssh.a: could not read symbols: Bad value *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. TB --- 2005-06-07 03:07:50 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2005-06-07 03:07:50 - ERROR: failed to build world TB --- 2005-06-07 03:07:50 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 7 04:51:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5FE16A41C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 04:51:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB3A43D4C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 04:51:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j574pIgb029835; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:51:18 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:51:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Freddie Cash In-Reply-To: <200506060944.51553.fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca> Message-ID: <20050607004922.P91224@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A9456E9FA@vip10-win2k.vipstructures.com> <20050606120017.B87454@zoraida.natserv.net> <200506060944.51553.fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 04:51:19 -0000 On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Freddie Cash wrote: > If the load is low, and you only want RAID1, have you considered the > software RAID capabilities of ccd(4), gmirror(8), and gvium(8)? Not really.. Would they be able to mirror the boot partition? The client agreed to pay for the RAID card. It would cost the client more to have me learn how to use software RAID that it cost him to get the card.. not to mention it will be easier to manage. :-) Thanks for the feeback though.. I would be curious as to what can NOT be done through software RAID(ie if it can not protect the boot partition). From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 7 06:49:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCBA16A41C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 06:49:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sty@iki.fi) Received: from postman.riken.go.jp (postman.riken.go.jp [134.160.33.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76FBE43D49 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 06:49:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sty@iki.fi) Received: (qmail 7892 invoked by uid 1111); 7 Jun 2005 06:49:42 -0000 Received: from sty@iki.fi by postman-smtp2.riken.go.jp by uid 0 with qmail-scanner-1.20 (sweep: 2.18/3.77. Clear:RC:1(134.160.173.1):. Processed in 0.014423 secs); 07 Jun 2005 06:49:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?172.16.112.32?) (134.160.173.1) by postman.riken.go.jp with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 7 Jun 2005 06:49:42 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20050607004922.P91224@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A9456E9FA@vip10-win2k.vipstructures.com> <20050606120017.B87454@zoraida.natserv.net> <200506060944.51553.fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca> <20050607004922.P91224@zoraida.natserv.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <9EECAEA6-6548-4EE3-BF0F-D52142D41E37@iki.fi> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tommi_L=E4tti?= Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 15:49:41 +0900 To: Francisco Reyes X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 06:49:45 -0000 On 7 Jun 2005, at 13:51, Francisco Reyes wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Freddie Cash wrote: > > >> If the load is low, and you only want RAID1, have you considered the >> software RAID capabilities of ccd(4), gmirror(8), and gvium(8)? >> > > Not really.. Would they be able to mirror the boot partition? I've been running gmirror on three different servers since January (everything mirrored, boots fine) and recovered from one crash. After crash I had to manually remove the problem drive from the mirror config and insert a new one but otherwise it's been a breeze. here's a set of good instructions how to setup gmirror on system disk: http://dannyman.toldme.com/2005/01/24/freebsd-howto-gmirror-system/ -- br, Tommi From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 7 07:22:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935D816A41C; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:22:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0CCC43D55; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:22:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j577M6wW058837; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:22:06 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua ([82.193.96.10]) by localhost (rocky.ipnet [82.193.96.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 51970-10; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:22:05 +0300 (EEST) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j577M5HY058834 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:22:05 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.3/8.13.3) id j577MW1i030878; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:22:32 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:22:32 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: "David O'Brien" Message-ID: <20050607072232.GC30490@ip.net.ua> References: <20050603212555.GB36509@ip.net.ua> <20050605022447.GB26993@dragon.NUXI.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QRj9sO5tAVLaXnSD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050605022447.GB26993@dragon.NUXI.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ip.net.ua Cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: device speaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 07:22:08 -0000 --QRj9sO5tAVLaXnSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi David, On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 07:24:47PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 12:25:55AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Any reason not to enable "device speaker" on amd64? I just > > tried compiling and kldloading the module, and spkrtest(8) > > was quite happy and loud about it. >=20 > No objections if it now works. >=20 Fine. I'd like to repo-copy sys/i386/isa/spkr.c (and its header) somewhere to sys/x86/ once the latter is ready. Do you have any estimation when one gets ready? Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --QRj9sO5tAVLaXnSD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCpUs4qRfpzJluFF4RAor+AJwPgSS3eVCLcpBvAs0bhzVxIks4TwCfWLeo 59a+6Va81saP9s3pnuA2b/c= =QAz/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QRj9sO5tAVLaXnSD-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 7 07:58:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: amd64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB5E16A41C; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:58:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DDFD43D48; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:58:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j577wgIb061125; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:58:42 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua ([82.193.96.10]) by localhost (rocky.ipnet [82.193.96.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 53712-15; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:58:41 +0300 (EEST) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j577wfNS061122 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:58:41 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.3/8.13.3) id j577x8LY031138; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:59:08 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:59:08 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Message-ID: <20050607075908.GG30490@ip.net.ua> References: <20050607030750.0375D7306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iAL9S67WQOXgEPD9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050607030750.0375D7306E@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ip.net.ua Cc: amd64@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 07:58:45 -0000 --iAL9S67WQOXgEPD9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi DES, I'm getting exactly the same failure failure when compiling on amd64. You cannot just link .a with the shared objects on amd64. I suggest that you revert your changes which made libssh an internal library, as it causes more pain than a gain. (I've been experimenting with various patches that fix-up now redundant dependencies after you made libssh an internal lib when I was caught by this.) Another option is to build a special PIC library, and use it to compile pam_ssh.so. You decide if you want it the hard way or not. :-) On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 11:07:50PM -0400, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2005-06-07 02:32:25 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sen= tex.ca > TB --- 2005-06-07 02:32:25 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd= 64 > TB --- 2005-06-07 02:32:25 - cleaning the object tree > TB --- 2005-06-07 02:32:59 - checking out the source tree > TB --- 2005-06-07 02:32:59 - cd /home/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 > TB --- 2005-06-07 02:32:59 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -P= d -A src > TB --- 2005-06-07 02:39:07 - building world (CFLAGS=3D-O2 -pipe) > TB --- 2005-06-07 02:39:07 - cd /home/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src > TB --- 2005-06-07 02:39:07 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld > >>> Building an up-to-date make(1) > >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree > >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims > >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools > >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree > >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree > >>> stage 2.3: build tools > >>> stage 3: cross tools > >>> stage 4.1: building includes > >>> stage 4.2: building libraries > [...] > =3D=3D=3D> lib/libpam/modules/pam_self (all) > cc -fpic -DPIC -O2 -pipe -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam= /modules/pam_self/../../../../contrib/openpam/include -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/= amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_self/../../libpam -Wsystem-headers -= Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -= Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strin= gs -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunused-parameter -Wno-uninitialized -c = /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_self/pam_self.c -= o pam_self.So > building shared library pam_self.so.2 > =3D=3D=3D> lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh (all) > cc -fpic -DPIC -O2 -pipe -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam= /modules/pam_ssh/../../../../crypto/openssh -I/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd6= 4/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/../../../../contrib/openpam/include -I/tin= derbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/../../libpam -c = /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/pam_ssh.c -o = pam_ssh.So > building shared library pam_ssh.so.2 > /home/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd= 64/src/tmp/usr/bin/ld: /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/tinderbox/C= URRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/../../../../secure/lib/li= bssh/libssh.a(authfile.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when maki= ng a shared object; recompile with -fPIC > /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/sr= c/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh/../../../../secure/lib/libssh/libssh.a: could = not read symbols: Bad value > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh. > *** Error code 1 Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --iAL9S67WQOXgEPD9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCpVPMqRfpzJluFF4RAtAVAKCAW51s2mni+m8DGB7wu3YnukvgKwCfRJSy 50SeX7ZrQ7FKqFqWBYL4xQQ= =Zeit -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iAL9S67WQOXgEPD9-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 7 10:55:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A2916A41C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:55:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vitos.laszlo@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D0B043D1D for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 10:55:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vitos.laszlo@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so191584wra for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 03:55:57 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=D0Uv75xOL5misnufZFOW3oZcZgwxNmna7dcYK7hTEVEQuWndek0c3oKhA8nOE+MRaN69BmEHNR0YLT2KfEOyM3zTwP0UJbW7dVMVTi1FOSLFyqGTlXranABMXlhNvfGsATiKHlLOogCBIGzC+mgqSXoOHGcRFR1U9ZEeLvnHFwE= Received: by 10.54.5.47 with SMTP id 47mr3766226wre; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 03:55:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from laca.evol.ro ([193.230.202.166]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 26sm704650wrl.2005.06.07.03.55.56; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 03:55:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Laszlo Vitos Organization: - To: Bruce Evans Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 13:55:53 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200506030943.40215.vitos.laszlo@gmail.com> <20050604162348.V5146@delplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20050604162348.V5146@delplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506071355.53607.vitos.laszlo@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: top showing incorrect CPU and WCPU on amd64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 10:55:58 -0000 On Saturday 04 June 2005 09:34, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Laszlo Vitos wrote: > > I observed a strange behavior of top on FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE on AMD64. It > > seems like the CPU and WCPU columns in top are an average over the > > running time of a process. A small test program confirmed this. It sleeps > > for 2 seconds, then goes over a few iterations of: hogs the cpu in a > > loop, then sleeps again for a few seconds. > > The result: CPU and WCPU never reach 100%, nor 0%, they are > > growing/shrinking in small increments during the process' run time, > > depending on whether the process is sleeping or looping. > > Attached is the test program. Can anyone confirm whether this is the > > expected behavior (and if so, why?)? > > No test program is attached :-). Yes, sorry about that, I don't know why it did not go through. > > I think this is the expected beviour. CPU is a long-term average. Thus > if a process runs for half the time and sleeps for half the time, its CPU > will be about 50%. It won't be exactly 50% since more weight is given > to recent history. WCPU is mostly bogus. It is an attempt to undo the > weighting but not enough history is kept to do this correctly and the > history which is used is close to being garbage. In the meantime I dug into the sched_* sources a bit and realised that indeed, that is the case. Sorry that I didn't look first, but it did not cross my mind that this is actually what the expected behaviour supposed to be. I guess there were a few flame wars about this in the past :) Anyway, thanks for the info, laca From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 7 14:37:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50CF716A41C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:37:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fcash@sd73.bc.ca) Received: from imap.sd73.bc.ca (smtp.sd73.bc.ca [142.24.13.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151DD43D5C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:37:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fcash@sd73.bc.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.sd73.bc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0436318CCE1 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:37:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from imap.sd73.bc.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailtest.sd73.bc.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 32832-02-31 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:37:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by imap.sd73.bc.ca (Postfix, from userid 80) id 8DB2218CCAA; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:37:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 24.71.128.63 (SquirrelMail authenticated user fcash) by imap.sd73.bc.ca with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:37:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <63015.24.71.128.63.1118155036.squirrel@imap.sd73.bc.ca> In-Reply-To: <20050607004922.P91224@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A9456E9FA@vip10-win2k.vipstructures.com> <20050606120017.B87454@zoraida.natserv.net> <200506060944.51553.fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca> <20050607004922.P91224@zoraida.natserv.net> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 07:37:16 -0700 (PDT) From: "Freddie Cash" To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 [CVS] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at sd73.bc.ca Subject: Re: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fcash@sd73.bc.ca List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 14:37:20 -0000 > On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Freddie Cash wrote: >>If the load is low, and you only want RAID1, have you considered >> the software RAID capabilities of ccd(4), gmirror(8), and gvium(8)? > Not really.. Would they be able to mirror the boot partition? > The client agreed to pay for the RAID card. It would cost the client > more to have me learn how to use software RAID that it cost him to get > the card.. not to mention it will be easier to manage. :-) True. If the client wants and is willing to pay for a hardware RAID card, then get him a hardware RAID card. :) > Thanks for the feeback though.. I would be curious as to what can NOT > be done through software RAID(ie if it can not protect the boot > partition). I've only played with and researched gmirror(8), and it can mirror the boot partition. Both disks in a mirror can be made bootable as well. -- Freddie Cash, CCNT CCLP Helpdesk / Network Support Tech. School District 73 (250) 377-HELP [377-4357] fcash@sd73.bc.ca helpdesk@sd73.bc.ca From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 7 15:32:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1EB716A41C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 15:32:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208EB43D58 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 15:32:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j57FWgxn024295; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 11:32:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 11:32:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Adriaan de Groot In-Reply-To: <200506050949.54551.groot@kde.org> Message-ID: <20050607113123.R97707@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20050604234246.G69694@zoraida.natserv.net> <200506050949.54551.groot@kde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which motherboard for RAID in AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 15:32:44 -0000 On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > Via KT800's embedded RAID which shows up as atapci1: controller> works as a RAID controller; configure the RAID array before > installation and use ar0 as the device to install FreeBSD to. > > Promise 20378 RAID which shows up as atapci0: controller> works as a RAID controller; same deal. > > My K8V has both of these controllers, I am a little confused. Do you have one of those onboard and the second as a pci card? > my Gigabyte board only the VIA. Which model? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 7 15:39:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A30316A41F for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 15:39:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from e0-a11.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz (e0-a11.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz [195.122.204.152]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9382843D5E for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 15:39:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e0-a11.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j57FdYuI094824; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:39:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from pav@localhost) by pav.hide.vol.cz (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j57FdY1P094823; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:39:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: pav.hide.vol.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Pav Lucistnik To: Francisco Reyes In-Reply-To: <20050607113123.R97707@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20050604234246.G69694@zoraida.natserv.net> <200506050949.54551.groot@kde.org> <20050607113123.R97707@zoraida.natserv.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-T5hwpMcBL3pllIpYrbwr" Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 17:39:33 +0200 Message-Id: <1118158773.41751.33.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Which motherboard for RAID in AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 15:39:38 -0000 --=-T5hwpMcBL3pllIpYrbwr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Francisco Reyes p=ED=B9e v =FAt 07. 06. 2005 v 11:32 -0400: > On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Adriaan de Groot wrote: >=20 > > Via KT800's embedded RAID which shows up as atapci1: > controller> works as a RAID controller; configure the RAID array before > > installation and use ar0 as the device to install FreeBSD to. > > > > Promise 20378 RAID which shows up as atapci0: > controller> works as a RAID controller; same deal. > > > > My K8V has both of these controllers, >=20 > I am a little confused. Do you have one of those onboard and the second a= s=20 > a pci card? No, these boards use to have two separate ATA chips integrated, from two different vendors... --=20 Pav Lucistnik Cats happen. --=-T5hwpMcBL3pllIpYrbwr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCpb+1ntdYP8FOsoIRArmvAJ9WL9ZwH2JgxFjTnlSaxU5MQtaKEQCfUzq8 ESUAxp7uW3ir7OQPBYGWeaI= =8SYR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-T5hwpMcBL3pllIpYrbwr-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 7 15:49:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A6116A41C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 15:49:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from groot@kde.org) Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F0F43D4C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 15:49:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from groot@kde.org) Received: from odin.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.33] (helo=localhost.englishbreakfastnetwork.org) by pandora.cs.kun.nl (8.12.10/5.2) with ESMTP id j57FnXe6016569; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:49:33 +0200 (MEST) From: Adriaan de Groot To: Francisco Reyes , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:49:28 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.50 References: <20050604234246.G69694@zoraida.natserv.net> <200506050949.54551.groot@kde.org> <20050607113123.R97707@zoraida.natserv.net> In-Reply-To: <20050607113123.R97707@zoraida.natserv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506071749.28840.groot@kde.org> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 131.174.33.4 Cc: Subject: Re: Which motherboard for RAID in AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 15:49:37 -0000 On Tuesday 07 June 2005 17:32, you wrote: > On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > Via KT800's embedded RAID which shows up as atapci1: > controller> works as a RAID controller; configure the RAID array before > > installation and use ar0 as the device to install FreeBSD to. > > > > Promise 20378 RAID which shows up as atapci0: > controller> works as a RAID controller; same deal. > > > > My K8V has both of these controllers, > > I am a little confused. Do you have one of those onboard and the second as > a pci card? Lots of motherboards have two RAID controllers on board. See, the VIA KT800 chipset has one and some vendors add a second, like a promise, for added value. 4 SATA connectors on the motherboard, on two different controllers. > > my Gigabyte board only the VIA. > > Which model? Mmm, you could look that up in the motherboard list, but it's the GA-K8VT800. That one has only the VIA embedded RAID. -- These are your friends - Adem GPG: FEA2 A3FE Adriaan de Groot From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 7 19:00:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9248B16A41C; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:00:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3926243D1F; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:00:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C4B1FFDD6; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 21:00:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id CDD4D1FFAD3; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 21:00:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 8137415827; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:57:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A5A157EF; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:57:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:57:21 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de Cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: ezm3/cvsup ports diffs for amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 19:00:11 -0000 Hi, I finally updated ezm3/cvsup ports to be able to build cvsup on amd64. I had done this internally multiple times up to now but as long as there is no native amd64 support in ezm3 and we don't have a fully working C version of cvsup I think we should try to get this in as a last resort... Most of this is based on work done by peter@ from somewhen last year. [ see http://people.freebsd.org/~peter/ezm3-amd64/ ] I should have marked the patches included from there and thanks should go to him for all of this. The ezm3 port will use version 1.1 and not 1.2 on amd64. What I don't know: a) do the port patches break other ARCHs? b) does everything work on amd64? c) I didn't even think of running portlint so perhaps some ports people could polish and enhance things? So please test/review and let me know. You should be able to find the patches at: http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/ports/experimental/ezm3-amd64.diff.bz2 http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/ports/experimental/cvsup-amd64.diff.bz2 -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 7 21:24:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C99D16A41C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 21:24:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCBCB43D4C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 21:24:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j57LOBuw020357 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:24:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:24:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: FreeBSD amd64 List In-Reply-To: <63015.24.71.128.63.1118155036.squirrel@imap.sd73.bc.ca> Message-ID: <20050607172136.B99553@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A9456E9FA@vip10-win2k.vipstructures.com> <20050606120017.B87454@zoraida.natserv.net> <200506060944.51553.fcash-ml@sd73.bc.ca> <20050607004922.P91224@zoraida.natserv.net> <63015.24.71.128.63.1118155036.squirrel@imap.sd73.bc.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 21:24:13 -0000 On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Freddie Cash wrote: Just finished installing the base OS. In a previous post Eric Toll mentioned he got 3dm working in AMD64. Eric, or anyone else that has 3dm working, how did you get it to work? Which port? When I tried the 3dm port it said it was only for i386 architecture. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 7 21:39:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E39AD16A41C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 21:39:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vkashyap@amcc.com) Received: from hadar.amcc.com (hadar.amcc.com [192.195.69.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9098243D5C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 21:39:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vkashyap@amcc.com) Received: from mailhost01.amcc.com ([192.195.69.30]) by hadar.amcc.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id IHQHGZ00.MO5; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:38:59 -0700 Received: (from vkashyap-pc [10.66.13.13]) by mailhost01.amcc.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005060714403322766 ; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 14:40:34 -0700 From: "Vinod Kashyap" To: Francisco Reyes , FreeBSD amd64 List Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 14:38:48 -0700 X-Sent-Folder-Path: Sent Items X-Mailer: Oracle Connector for Outlook 9.0.4 51114 (9.0.6627) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: Cc: Subject: RE: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 21:39:03 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Francisco Reyes > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 2:24 PM > To: FreeBSD amd64 List > Subject: Re: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? > = > = > On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Freddie Cash wrote: > = > Just finished installing the base OS. > In a previous post Eric Toll mentioned he got 3dm working in AMD64. > = > Eric, or anyone else that has 3dm working, how did you get it to work? > Which port? When I tried the 3dm port it said it was only for i386 = > architecture. Try the one here: http://www.3ware.com/support/downloadnew.asp From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 7 21:57:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AF216A41C for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 21:57:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8854643D55 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 21:57:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j57LvOf0005756; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:57:24 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 17:57:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Vinod Kashyap In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20050607175652.J99670@zoraida.natserv.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List Subject: RE: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 21:57:27 -0000 On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Vinod Kashyap wrote: > Try the one here: > http://www.3ware.com/support/downloadnew.asp Thanks. Got it, but it says (0x08:0x0019): Inappropriate ioctl for device (0x0B:0x0047): Need to upgrade controller's driver or firmware So that's next.. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 02:38:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B38416A41C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 02:38:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from googl3meister@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE68343D48 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 02:38:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from googl3meister@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so68240wra for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 19:38:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Ipjrr1A/4ZY2j2F9udzA3gTvKmXgAVnluKBDcQD2e371R4SAqowdKhBZMiaihIDs3xHPV5tkR5hkfUlQB+NVNHNW7erTI4yAT0NKrJD/xIlRiIe4LwGWM0DZvgI259EDe6cQa+72T7AmD5k0KB/bzfanuseHtOg+nUb/Oz81iBY= Received: by 10.54.40.52 with SMTP id n52mr4270754wrn; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 19:38:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.31.69 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:38:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8f55402905060719386f941039@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 12:38:25 +1000 From: =?WINDOWS-1252?B?lSCV?= To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200506071749.28840.groot@kde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050604234246.G69694@zoraida.natserv.net> <200506050949.54551.groot@kde.org> <20050607113123.R97707@zoraida.natserv.net> <200506071749.28840.groot@kde.org> Subject: Re: Which motherboard for RAID in AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?WINDOWS-1252?B?lSCV?= List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 02:38:26 -0000 On 6/8/05, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Tuesday 07 June 2005 17:32, you wrote: > > On Sun, 5 Jun 2005, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > > Via KT800's embedded RAID which shows up as atapci1: > > controller> works as a RAID controller; configure the RAID array befo= re > > > installation and use ar0 as the device to install FreeBSD to. > > > > > > Promise 20378 RAID which shows up as atapci0: > > controller> works as a RAID controller; same deal. > > > > > > My K8V has both of these controllers, > > > > I am a little confused. Do you have one of those onboard and the second= as > > a pci card? >=20 > Lots of motherboards have two RAID controllers on board. See, the VIA KT8= 00 > chipset has one and some vendors add a second, like a promise, for added > value. 4 SATA connectors on the motherboard, on two different controllers= . >=20 > > > my Gigabyte board only the VIA. > > > > Which model? >=20 > Mmm, you could look that up in the motherboard list, but it's the GA-K8VT= 800. > That one has only the VIA embedded RAID. >=20 > -- > These are your friends - Adem > GPG: FEA2 A3FE Adriaan de Groot > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 Just to confirm, the Promise controller on the Asus A8V Deluxe works also - I disabled the other onboard VIA SATA RAID and just use the Promise for mirrored drives - works a treat. Configured at first boot and installed directly to ar0. Have split and rebuilt the world (as i386) just for testing. Thinking of a stripe on the VIA later maybe for swap. Have to say it's kinda neat to have 2 onboard raid even if only a 'consumer' level (no hot swap, battery backup), but the price is definitely right. --cheers gm From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 03:00:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F46F16A41C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 03:00:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from googl3meister@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302B943D53 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 03:00:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from googl3meister@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 70so104110wra for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 20:00:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pFw6Pvx49N2AjKNip4wbiXn0PWePHcFBKZUqNalai5pyg5jO3oPU7aqKpwWgue2C/RVze+cyd7LXOj4J9uyI1KMkImVbsLv1gICQhqAe8dZba4S13gViKn8RItG0fvJk/bA1Dpc7oEasrFfLJ9rDvSC9/knBpUY7aeTrrPKwUzI= Received: by 10.54.40.57 with SMTP id n57mr4248774wrn; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 20:00:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.31.69 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 20:00:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <8f55402905060720004f637ce7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:00:33 +1000 From: =?WINDOWS-1252?B?lSCV?= To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <32734.217.119.178.19.1117718949.squirrel@217.119.178.19> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline References: <5979.217.119.178.19.1117524590.squirrel@217.119.178.19> <429E3149.8030101@hosting50.cz> <32734.217.119.178.19.1117718949.squirrel@217.119.178.19> Subject: Re: [CPU temperature] X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?WINDOWS-1252?B?lSCV?= List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 03:00:35 -0000 T24gNi8yLzA1LCB0ZmFnYXJ0QGJyb3pzLm5ldCA8dGZhZ2FydEBicm96cy5uZXQ+IHdyb3RlOgo+ IFRoYW5rcyBmb3IgdGhlIGluZm9ybWF0aW9uLCBidXQgaXMgdGhlcmUgYW55IG90aGVyIHNvbHV0 aW9ucyBmb3IgU3RhYmxlCj4gcmVsZWFzZSA/Cj4gCj4gPiBIZWxsbywKPiA+Cj4gPiBJIGhhZCBw cm9ibGVtcyB3aXRoIGNvb2xpbmcgbXkgQU1ENjQvU29ja2V0IDc1NC8zMjAwKyB1bmRlciA1LjQu IEJ1dAo+ID4gQXRobG9uIDY0IHN1cHBvcnQgQ29vbE5RdWlldCAoUG93ZXJOb3cgSzgpIHdoaWNo IGlzIGltcGxhbnRlZCBpbnRvCj4gPiBjdXJyZW50IGFzIGNwdWZyZXEgLSAiZGV2aWNlIGNwdWZy ZXEiIGluIGtlcm5lbCBjb25maWd1cmF0aW9uIGFuZCB0aGVuCj4gPiBwb3dlcmRfZW5hYmxlPSJZ RVMiIGluIHJjLmNvbmYuCj4gPiBXaXRob3V0IGNwdWZyZXEgSSBoYWQgYWJvdXQgNjDLmiB3aXRo IG15IHF1aWV0IGNvb2xpbmcsIG5vdyBJIGhhdmUgMzjLmiwKPiA+IGJlY2F1c2UgbXkgZGVza3Rv cCBzeXN0ZW0gZG9uYHQgaGF2ZSBoZWF2eSBsb2FkLgo+ID4KPiA+IFRvbWFzIFJhbmRhCj4gPgo+ ID4gdGZhZ2FydEBicm96cy5uZXQgd3JvdGU6Cj4gPgo+ID4+SGVsbG8sCj4gPj4KPiA+PkFmdGVy IGhhdmluZyBkb25lIG15IHVwZ3JhZGUgdG8gNS40UmVsZWFzZSBJJ3ZlIG5vdGljZWQgdGhhdCB0 aGUgdGhlIENQVQo+ID4+dGVtcGVyYXR1cmUgb2YgbXkgYm94IGlzIDEwIGRlZ3LDqSBjZWxzaXVz IGhpZ2hlciB0aGFuIGl0IHdhcyBiZWZvcmUgd2l0aAo+ID4+NS4zUi4KPiA+PkkgaGF2ZW4ndCBj aGFuZ2VkIGFueXRoaW5nIGluIHRlcm1zIG9mIG51bWJlciBvZiBydW5uaW5nIHByb2Nlc3MsIGFu ZAo+ID4+bm90aGluZyBmb3IgbWUgY291bGQgZXhwbGFpbiB0aGlzIGluY3JlYXNlLgo+ID4+Cj4g Pj5BbHNvIEkndmUgZG9uZSB0aGUgc2FtZSB0ZXN0IHdpdGggaTM4NiByZWxlYXNlLCBhbmQgdGhl cmUncyBubyBzdWNoIGEKPiA+PmJlaGF2aW91ci4KPiA+Pgo+ID4+T25lIG9mIG15IGZyaWVuZCBp cyBoYXZpbmcgdGhlIHNhbWUgdHlwZSBvZiBpc3N1ZSB3aXRoIGRpZmZlcmVudCBoYXJkd2FyZQo+ ID4+KGJ1dCBzdGlsbCBBTUQ2NCkuCj4gPj4KPiA+PlRoZSB0b29sIEknbSB1c2luZyB0byBtb25p dG9yIHRlbXBlcnRhdHVyZSBpcyB4bWJtb24tMjA1XzEgKyBDYWN0aQo+ID4+U29mdHdhcmUKPiA+ Pgo+ID4+RnJlZUJTRCB3d3cgNS40LVJFTEVBU0UtcDEgRnJlZUJTRCA1LjQtUkVMRUFTRS1wMSAj NDM6IEZyaSBNYXkgMjAKPiA+PiAxNjoxNzowNAo+ID4+Q0VTVCAyMDA1ICAgICByb290QHd3dzov dXNyL3NyYy9zeXMvYW1kNjQvY29tcGlsZS9UT00gIGFtZDY0CgpJJ20gcnVubmluZyA1LjQtU1RB QkxFIHVzaW5nIGFuIGFzdXMgQThWIChzb2NrZXQgOTM5KSB3aXRoIGNvb2wnbnEKZW5hYmxlZCBp biBCSU9TIC0gQ1BVIDI4b3Zlcm5pZ2h0IC0gMzggZGVnIEMgaWRsZSBkdXJpbmcgZGF5IGFuZCBq dW1wCnRvIDQ0IChlZzogY29tcGlsaW5nIGpkazE1L21ha2UgLWo0IGJ1aWxkd29ybGQpIGluIGEg MjVkZWcgQwplbnZpcm9ubWVudCAoYSByZWFzb25hYmx5IHdhcm0gcm9vbSB0byBiZWdpbiB3aXRo KS4gIEkgZG9uJ3QgaGF2ZQpjcHVmcmVxIGRldmljZSAodXNpbmcgNS40KS4gIEJ1dCBJJ3ZlIG5v dCBzZWVuIHRoZSB0ZW1wcyB5b3UgbWVudGlvbiAtCjYwIHNvdW5kcyBob3QgdG8gbWUuCgotLWNo ZWVycwpnbQo= From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 13:21:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A2616A41C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:21:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903B443D53 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:21:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j58DLAIr000401 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:21:10 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 09:21:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: FreeBSD amd64 List Message-ID: <20050608091315.E8933@zoraida.natserv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Programs memory usage in AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 13:21:12 -0000 Before I got an AMD64 motherboard for a client I asked about memory usage. I was told that it was higher than i386.. perhaps twice as high. I am finding it's considerably higher. For example sshd takes under 3MB in i386. It takes close to 30MB in AMD64! csh takes 2MB in i386 and almost 6MB in AMD64. Not as bad as sshd, but still almost 3 times. :-( Why is it that programs take so much more memory in AMD64? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 14:01:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F2E16A41C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 14:01:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mvh@ix.netcom.com) Received: from pop-altamira.atl.sa.earthlink.net (pop-altamira.atl.sa.earthlink.net [207.69.195.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8C343D55 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 14:01:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mvh@ix.netcom.com) Received: from lsanca1-ar6-4-62-201-135.lsanca1.elnk.dsl.genuity.net ([4.62.201.135] helo=bsd.mvh) by pop-altamira.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #10) id 1Dg17A-0005dV-00 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 10:01:05 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bsd.mvh (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469C517A6F for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 07:01:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bsd.mvh ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bsd.mvh [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00645-01 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 07:01:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bsd.mvh (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9038B17A01 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 07:01:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Harding To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 07:01:01 -0700 Message-Id: <1118239261.1281.9.camel@bsd.mvh> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at bsd.mvh Subject: Follow-up - K8T890 where everything works (Soltek, recommended) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 14:01:07 -0000 I purchased a Soltek SL-K890Pro-939 mainboard at NewEgg for $98 and it's been rock-solid and everything I have tried has worked well. On board sound, on-board ethernet, USB, everything. I have included the 'dmesg' output below - note that I also have an M-Audio board installed, so it shows up as unknown hardware. I am using the M-Audio board via the 4front driver but I did test out the onboard audio. Recommended if you are looking for a FreeBSD compatible AMD-64 MB. Easy setup and everything I have tried works well. I've booted the system in both i386 and amd64 mode. I am also running a 'Cool n' quiet' kernel module, it does keep the chip temps down when the system is idle. The board appears to be of very good quality, and has an, er, 'interesting' color scheme, with lots of purple and some yellow, good for Lakers' fans I suppose. I am including the 'dmesg' output below. Can somebody tell me what 'acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR' means? I will put this on the supported MB page soon, after I incorporate feedback to this post. bash-2.05b$ dmesg Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p1 #0: Tue Jun 7 09:41:09 PDT 2005 root@bsd.mvh:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MVH Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3700+ (2199.77-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x20f71 Stepping = 1 Features=0x78bfbff AMD Features=0xe0500000 real memory = 1072562176 (1022 MB) avail memory = 1035833344 (987 MB) ACPI APIC Table: ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard ioapic1 irqs 24-47 on motherboard npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi_bus_number: can't get _ADR acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x4008-0x400b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pci0: at device 0.5 (no driver attached) pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pcib2: irq 27 at device 2.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 nvidia0: mem 0xd4000000-0xd4ffffff,0xc8000000-0xcfffffff,0xd0000000-0xd3ffffff irq 24 at device 0.0 on pci2 pcib3: irq 31 at device 3.0 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 pcib4: irq 35 at device 3.1 on pci0 pci4: on pcib4 pcib5: irq 39 at device 3.2 on pci0 pci5: on pcib5 pcib6: irq 43 at device 3.3 on pci0 pci6: on pcib6 re0: port 0xd000-0xd0ff mem 0xdc040000-0xdc0400ff irq 17 at device 6.0 on pci0 miibus0: on re0 rgephy0: on miibus0 rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseTX, 1000baseTX-FDX, auto re0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:4c:00:60:67 atapci0: port 0xd400-0xd4ff,0xe700-0xe77f mem 0xdc000000-0xdc01ffff,0xdc043000-0xdc043fff irq 19 at device 7.0 on pci0 atapci0: failed: rid 0x20 is memory, requested 4 ata2: channel #0 on atapci0 ata3: channel #1 on atapci0 ata4: channel #2 on atapci0 pci0: at device 9.0 (no driver attached) fwohci0: port 0xe100-0xe17f mem 0xdc041000-0xdc0417ff irq 18 at device 12.0 on pci0 fwohci0: OHCI version 1.10 (ROM=1) fwohci0: No. of Isochronous channels is 4. fwohci0: EUI64 00:11:06:66:00:1e:78:bb fwohci0: Phy 1394a available S400, 2 ports. fwohci0: Link S400, max_rec 2048 bytes. firewire0: on fwohci0 fwe0: on firewire0 if_fwe0: Fake Ethernet address: 02:11:06:1e:78:bb fwe0: Ethernet address: 02:11:06:1e:78:bb fwe0: if_start running deferred for Giant sbp0: on firewire0 fwohci0: Initiate bus reset fwohci0: node_id=0xc800ffc0, gen=1, CYCLEMASTER mode firewire0: 1 nodes, maxhop <= 0, cable IRM = 0 (me) firewire0: bus manager 0 (me) atapci1: port 0xe600-0xe60f,0xe500-0xe503,0xe400-0xe407,0xe300-0xe303,0xe200-0xe207 irq 20 at device 15.0 on pci0 ata5: channel #0 on atapci1 ata6: channel #1 on atapci1 atapci2: port 0xe800-0xe80f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 15.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci2 ata1: channel #1 on atapci2 uhci0: port 0xe900-0xe91f irq 21 at device 16.0 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xea00-0xea1f irq 21 at device 16.1 on pci0 usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0xeb00-0xeb1f irq 21 at device 16.2 on pci0 usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: port 0xec00-0xec1f irq 21 at device 16.3 on pci0 usb3: on uhci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pci0: at device 16.4 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 17.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 pci0: at device 17.5 (no driver attached) acpi_tz0: on acpi0 fdc0: port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: model MouseMan+, device ID 0 pmtimer0 on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 ulpt0: HewLett Packard HP LaserJet 1200, rev 1.10/1.00, addr 2, iclass 7/1 ulpt0: using bi-directional mode ums0: Logitech USB-PS/2 Optical Mouse, rev 2.00/13.00, addr 3, iclass 3/1 ums0: 4 buttons and Z dir. Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2199768836 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ipfw2 initialized, divert disabled, rule-based forwarding disabled, default to accept, logging disabled acd0: DVDR at ata0-master UDMA33 ad10: 286168MB [581421/16/63] at ata5-master SATA150 cd0 at ata0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 cd0: <_NEC DVD_RW ND-3520AW 3.04> Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 33.000MB/s transfers cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad10s2a cpu0: Px state: P0, 2200MHz, 85300mW, 100us, 9us cpu0: Px state: P1, 2000MHz, 83000mW, 100us, 9us cpu0: Px state: P2, 1800MHz, 70400mW, 100us, 9us cpu0: Px state: P3, 1000MHz, 36100mW, 100us, 9us cpu0: Px method: AMD K8 Cool'n'Quiet envy24ht: Recording is not possible with dsp0 envy24ht: Recording is not possible with dsp0 envy24ht: Recording is not possible with dsp1 envy24ht: Recording is not possible with dsp2 envy24ht: Recording is not possible with dsp3 envy24ht: Recording is not possible with dsp4 Softoss: Audio device #6 is write only Softoss: Audio device #7 is write only Softoss: Audio device #8 is write only Softoss: Audio device #9 is write only Softoss: Audio device #10 is write only Softoss: Audio device #11 is write only Softoss: Audio device #12 is write only Softoss: Audio device #13 is write only envy24ht: Recording is not possible with dsp0 envy24ht: Recording is not possible with dsp0 envy24ht: Recording is not possible with dsp1 envy24ht: Recording is not possible with dsp2 envy24ht: Recording is not possible with dsp3 envy24ht: Recording is not possible with dsp4 Softoss: Audio device #6 is write only Softoss: Audio device #7 is write only Softoss: Audio device #8 is write only Softoss: Audio device #9 is write only Softoss: Audio device #10 is write only Softoss: Audio device #11 is write only Softoss: Audio device #12 is write only Softoss: Audio device #13 is write only bash-2.05b$ -- Mike Harding From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 14:08:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1549916A41C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 14:08:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [65.205.34.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625C943D53 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 14:08:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318EBB80C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:08:32 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) In-Reply-To: <20050608091315.E8933@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20050608091315.E8933@zoraida.natserv.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Vivek Khera Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:08:31 -0400 To: FreeBSD amd64 List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) Subject: Re: Programs memory usage in AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 14:08:36 -0000 On Jun 8, 2005, at 9:21 AM, Francisco Reyes wrote: > > I am finding it's considerably higher. For example > > sshd takes under 3MB in i386. It takes close to 30MB in AMD64! > > csh takes 2MB in i386 and almost 6MB in AMD64. Not as bad as sshd, > but still almost 3 times. :-( > > Why is it that programs take so much more memory in AMD64? > That's the VSZ I see. I'm sure that includes the entire shared object size as well, which doesn't really matter since they are shared in physical memory. The RSS are comparable. Vivek Khera, Ph.D. +1-301-869-4449 x806 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 15:06:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABD1716A420; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:06:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@home.utahime.org) Received: from utahime.as.wakwak.ne.jp (utahime.as.wakwak.ne.jp [61.205.238.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CAE643D4C; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:06:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@home.utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) by utahime.as.wakwak.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E4DB913; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 00:06:09 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost.home.utahime.org (localhost.home.utahime.org [127.0.0.1]) by localhost-backdoor.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0AAB5699; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 00:06:08 +0900 (JST) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (localhost.home.utahime.org [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.home.utahime.org (AvMailGate-2.0.2-15) id 38793-61487BF6; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 00:06:02 +0900 Received: by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix, from userid 0) id 9F7835691; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 00:05:12 +0900 (JST) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (localhost.home.utahime.org [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.home.utahime.org (AvMailGate-2.0.2-14) id 29351-30EEB6D8; Wed, 08 Jun 2005 04:00:29 +0900 Received: from utahime.as.wakwak.ne.jp (maybe.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.253]) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B64054A2 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 04:00:29 +0900 (JST) Received: from sv.dsl.gr.jp (sv.dsl.gr.jp [210.239.46.42]) by utahime.as.wakwak.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E1FAB82A for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 04:00:29 +0900 (JST) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119]) by sv.dsl.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BB9A5F0 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 04:00:28 +0900 (JST) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 776CB5624F; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:00:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4774116A42D; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:00:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org) Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9248B16A41C; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:00:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3926243D1F; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:00:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C4B1FFDD6; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 21:00:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id CDD4D1FFAD3; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 21:00:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 8137415827; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:57:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A5A157EF; Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:57:21 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:57:21 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Errors-To: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.0.2-15; AVE: 6.31.0.5; VDF: 6.31.0.16; host: eastasia.home.utahime.org) X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.0.2-15; AVE: 6.31.0.5; VDF: 6.31.0.16; host: eastasia.home.utahime.org) Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: ezm3/cvsup ports diffs for amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 15:06:13 -0000 Hi, I finally updated ezm3/cvsup ports to be able to build cvsup on amd64. I had done this internally multiple times up to now but as long as there is no native amd64 support in ezm3 and we don't have a fully working C version of cvsup I think we should try to get this in as a last resort... Most of this is based on work done by peter@ from somewhen last year. [ see http://people.freebsd.org/~peter/ezm3-amd64/ ] I should have marked the patches included from there and thanks should go to him for all of this. The ezm3 port will use version 1.1 and not 1.2 on amd64. What I don't know: a) do the port patches break other ARCHs? b) does everything work on amd64? c) I didn't even think of running portlint so perhaps some ports people could polish and enhance things? So please test/review and let me know. You should be able to find the patches at: http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/ports/experimental/ezm3-amd64.diff.bz2 http://sources.zabbadoz.net/freebsd/ports/experimental/cvsup-amd64.diff.bz2 -- Greetings Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- This e-mail was scanned with a private, non-commercial version of AntiVir MailGate. See http://www.antivir.de for details. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 17:09:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DBF816A41C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:09:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D523443D4C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 17:09:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j58H9fI3028119; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:09:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 13:09:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Vivek Khera In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20050608130606.U10134@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20050608091315.E8933@zoraida.natserv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List Subject: Re: Programs memory usage in AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 17:09:43 -0000 On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Vivek Khera wrote: >> sshd takes under 3MB in i386. It takes close to 30MB in AMD64! > > That's the VSZ I see. I'm sure that includes the entire shared object size > as well, which doesn't really matter since they are shared in physical > memory. The RSS are comparable. Thanks for the info. So I guess the "real size" in AMD64 is reporting shared objects. I wonder if that is the way we want it to report.. I will look at RES then.. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 18:52:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B397516A41C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 18:52:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5254643D48 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 18:52:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j58IqHAR029510 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 14:52:17 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 14:52:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: FreeBSD amd64 List Message-ID: <20050608145053.B10686@zoraida.natserv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Top broken in AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 18:52:18 -0000 Building a kernel and top reports 0.0% idle, yet it doesn't show a single program with ANY utilization under WCPU or CPU most of the time. Ocassionaly it would show up to 20% on WCPU, but for the most part it's 0. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 18:54:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6F516A41C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 18:54:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from mail.mcneil.com (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB8D43D1D for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 18:54:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sean@mcneil.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29810F1B62; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:54:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.mcneil.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (server.mcneil.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 74981-03; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:54:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mcneil.com (mcneil.com [24.199.45.54]) by mail.mcneil.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14B99F183C; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:54:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean McNeil To: Francisco Reyes In-Reply-To: <20050608145053.B10686@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20050608145053.B10686@zoraida.natserv.net> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Sean McNeil Consulting, Inc Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 11:54:42 -0700 Message-Id: <1118256882.76070.0.camel@server.mcneil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mcneil.com Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List Subject: Re: Top broken in AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: sean@mcneil.com List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 18:54:45 -0000 On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 14:52 -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Building a kernel and top reports 0.0% idle, yet it doesn't show a single > program with ANY utilization under WCPU or CPU most of the time. > Ocassionaly it would show up to 20% on WCPU, but for the most part it's 0. That is because the processes are not lasting long enough to show in top. This is perfectly normal behavior and top is not broken. Cheers, Sean From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 19:59:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB1016A41C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 19:59:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F37943D49 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 19:59:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j58JxBKi011973; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:59:11 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 15:59:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Sean McNeil In-Reply-To: <1118256882.76070.0.camel@server.mcneil.com> Message-ID: <20050608155824.A11085@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20050608145053.B10686@zoraida.natserv.net> <1118256882.76070.0.camel@server.mcneil.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List Subject: Re: Top broken in AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 19:59:13 -0000 On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Sean McNeil wrote: > That is because the processes are not lasting long enough to show in > top. This is perfectly normal behavior and top is not broken. How long does a process needs to be running with over 0% utilization to show in top? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 20:35:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA4416A41C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:35:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A920743D48 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:35:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j58KZT4J027354 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:35:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) with UUCP id j58KZTjd027353; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:35:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: from titan.klemm.apsfilter.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by klemm.apsfilter.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j58KZEvF015211; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:35:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by titan.klemm.apsfilter.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j58KZD4x015206; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:35:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:35:13 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: Sean McNeil Message-ID: <20050608203513.GA2265@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> References: <20050608145053.B10686@zoraida.natserv.net> <1118256882.76070.0.camel@server.mcneil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1118256882.76070.0.camel@server.mcneil.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List Subject: Re: Top broken in AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 20:35:32 -0000 On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:54:42AM -0700, Sean McNeil wrote: > On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 14:52 -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote: > > Building a kernel and top reports 0.0% idle, yet it doesn't show a single > > program with ANY utilization under WCPU or CPU most of the time. > > Ocassionaly it would show up to 20% on WCPU, but for the most part it's 0. > > That is because the processes are not lasting long enough to show in > top. This is perfectly normal behavior and top is not broken. In former time that was different. Unluckily I don't remember when this changed. Even if its not a bug it limits the usefulness of top. I'd say normally you should expect to see what processes within delta t led to 0.0% idle. Can perhaps somebody explain why top nowadays seem to behave differently to lets say 2 years ago ? Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm - Powered by FreeBSD 5.4 Need a magic printfilter today ? -> http://www.apsfilter.org/ From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 20:50:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305E216A448; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:50:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C553D43D48; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:50:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j58Koq1r002526; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:50:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:50:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Andreas Klemm In-Reply-To: <20050608203513.GA2265@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> Message-ID: <20050608164934.Q11353@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20050608145053.B10686@zoraida.natserv.net> <1118256882.76070.0.camel@server.mcneil.com> <20050608203513.GA2265@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List Subject: Re: Top broken in AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 20:50:55 -0000 On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Andreas Klemm wrote: > In former time that was different. > Unluckily I don't remember when this changed. > Even if its not a bug it limits the usefulness of top. I agree. Specially when one has utilization close to 100% and nothing shows up in top as using more than 0.0%. :-( From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 20:54:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61A4B16A41C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:54:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0F2143D1F for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:54:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j58Ks0Zg004799 for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:54:00 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:53:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: FreeBSD amd64 List Message-ID: <20050608165110.O11353@zoraida.natserv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Ocaml or Unison port working for anyone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 20:54:01 -0000 Tried to compile unison.. failed on Ocaml-nox11 with an error that it doesn't compile in i386. Anyone has been able to get either of those compiled by hand insted of port? Also my guess the error probably meant to read that it only works in i386. Why do some ports require i386? Instructions not supported by gcc in AMD64? Is there anywhere a list of ports that don't work on AMD64? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 21:03:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BB816A41C; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:03:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mortis.over-yonder.net (adsl-222-102-125.jan.bellsouth.net [68.222.102.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6902243D53; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 21:03:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: by mortis.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id B351E20F6C; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:03:43 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:03:43 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Andreas Klemm Message-ID: <20050608210343.GB64736@over-yonder.net> References: <20050608145053.B10686@zoraida.natserv.net> <1118256882.76070.0.camel@server.mcneil.com> <20050608203513.GA2265@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050608203513.GA2265@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i-fullermd.2 Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List Subject: Re: Top broken in AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 21:03:45 -0000 On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:35:13PM +0200 I heard the voice of Andreas Klemm, and lo! it spake thus: > > I'd say normally you should expect to see what processes within > delta t led to 0.0% idle. How would you do that, when the process no longer exists? -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 8 23:30:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE5DD16A41C for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 23:30:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C5E543D1D for ; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 23:30:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6854851243; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 19:30:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 19:30:27 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Francisco Reyes Message-ID: <20050608233027.GA94104@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050608165110.O11353@zoraida.natserv.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050608165110.O11353@zoraida.natserv.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List Subject: Re: Ocaml or Unison port working for anyone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 23:30:29 -0000 --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 04:53:59PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Tried to compile unison.. failed on Ocaml-nox11 with an error that it=20 > doesn't compile in i386. >=20 > Anyone has been able to get either of those compiled by hand insted of=20 > port? >=20 > Also my guess the error probably meant to read that it only works in i386. >=20 > Why do some ports require i386? Instructions not supported by gcc in=20 > AMD64? Non-portable assumptions in the code (e.g. sizeof(void *) =3D=3D sizeof(int= )) > Is there anywhere a list of ports that don't work on AMD64? http://pointyhat.freebsd.org. Kris --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCp3+TWry0BWjoQKURAimjAJwMsz07o0UsMnZOsAffsK+ENzELBgCeJGS1 tvNO6ecnc0Jy54qaquQDd+g= =cnZj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 00:52:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F57116A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 00:52:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA44A43D48 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 00:52:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j590qe5p016502; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:52:40 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:52:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20050608233027.GA94104@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20050608203207.X12338@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20050608165110.O11353@zoraida.natserv.net> <20050608233027.GA94104@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List Subject: Re: Ocaml or Unison port working for anyone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 00:52:42 -0000 On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Why do some ports require i386? Instructions not supported by gcc in >> AMD64? > > Non-portable assumptions in the code (e.g. sizeof(void *) == sizeof(int)) I had never looked at those error logs before but it seemed like the port compiled and there were errors deleting some files. Since I could not find any build errors tried to look at other report logs to see how errors look, but the handfull I tried none had logs. :-( > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org. I was looking at the "by error type vs build environment". How often is that run? The date on top was from late May. Also on the "last run 5.X" many of the ports don't have any logs. What does that mean? At first I thought maybe it meant they compiled ok, but looking for ports I have compiled, none was found so the complete list seems like it's broken ports. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 00:54:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F1616A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 00:54:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E8FE43D48 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 00:54:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6687D51269; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:54:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 20:54:42 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Francisco Reyes Message-ID: <20050609005442.GA10723@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050608165110.O11353@zoraida.natserv.net> <20050608233027.GA94104@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050608203207.X12338@zoraida.natserv.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050608203207.X12338@zoraida.natserv.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Ocaml or Unison port working for anyone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 00:54:44 -0000 --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 08:52:40PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > >>Why do some ports require i386? Instructions not supported by gcc in > >>AMD64? > > > >Non-portable assumptions in the code (e.g. sizeof(void *) =3D=3D sizeof(= int)) >=20 > I had never looked at those error logs before but it seemed like the port= =20 > compiled and there were errors deleting some files. Since I could not=20 > find any build errors tried to look at other report logs to see how=20 > errors look, but the handfull I tried none had logs. :-( >=20 >=20 > >http://pointyhat.freebsd.org. >=20 > I was looking at the "by error type vs build environment". How often is= =20 > that run? The date on top was from late May. >=20 > Also on the "last run 5.X" many of the ports don't have any logs. What=20 > does that mean? At first I thought maybe it meant they compiled ok, but= =20 > looking for ports I have compiled, none was found so the complete list=20 > seems like it's broken ports. You probably want to look at where it says "look here to find the most recent error with your port" Kris --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCp5NRWry0BWjoQKURAl2LAKD7OkpS/3qgAlQUxBri6VDZym3ltwCg5TcF qd0kc7rBeYWy+2juLtDmEuk= =hPu5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 02:07:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39B1516A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 02:07:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF34A43D48 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 02:07:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5927Z2v008211; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:07:35 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:07:35 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20050608233027.GA94104@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20050608220601.V12926@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20050608165110.O11353@zoraida.natserv.net> <20050608233027.GA94104@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List Subject: Re: Ocaml or Unison port working for anyone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 02:07:37 -0000 On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Anyone has been able to get either of those compiled by hand insted of >> port? I just compiled Ocaml from source and unison from port. > http://pointyhat.freebsd.org. Is there any additional info besides what's on that page for those who may want to help port maintainers? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 03:43:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4F616A45C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 03:43:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1B243D49 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 03:43:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6E4EB51269; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 23:43:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 23:43:34 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Francisco Reyes Message-ID: <20050609034334.GA59345@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050608165110.O11353@zoraida.natserv.net> <20050608233027.GA94104@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050608220601.V12926@zoraida.natserv.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050608220601.V12926@zoraida.natserv.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Ocaml or Unison port working for anyone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 03:43:35 -0000 --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:07:35PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > >>Anyone has been able to get either of those compiled by hand insted of > >>port? >=20 > I just compiled Ocaml from source and unison from port. >=20 > >http://pointyhat.freebsd.org. >=20 > Is there any additional info besides what's on that page for those who ma= y=20 > want to help port maintainers? What "additional info" are you looking for? Kris --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCp7rmWry0BWjoQKURAi7rAJ9WC5czuJ6YgtS4pDKd2OcbZiqI5ACgxwYb HsebOOTeL6ZPtPHaCkm+YoE= =6xW5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HlL+5n6rz5pIUxbD-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 03:59:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7143D16A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 03:59:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA8D43D4C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 03:59:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j593xBIX008386; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 23:59:11 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 23:59:10 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Kris Kennaway In-Reply-To: <20050609034334.GA59345@xor.obsecurity.org> Message-ID: <20050608235701.M13526@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20050608165110.O11353@zoraida.natserv.net> <20050608233027.GA94104@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050608220601.V12926@zoraida.natserv.net> <20050609034334.GA59345@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List Subject: Re: Ocaml or Unison port working for anyone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 03:59:12 -0000 On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: >>> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org. >> Is there any additional info besides what's on that page for those who may >> want to help port maintainers? > > What "additional info" are you looking for? For instance towards the bottom of the page I see a list of common errors, but when I looked at the log for the Ocaml build I did not see any of those.. maybe I missed it.. Basically I would like to know if the port testing framework has any keywords or any structure that would aid in finding where the port build failed. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 05:05:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8AC16A41C; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 05:05:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E3CE43D1D; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 05:05:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j5955N4J041038 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 07:05:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) with UUCP id j5955NMW041037; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 07:05:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: from titan.klemm.apsfilter.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by klemm.apsfilter.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j58LC3so021054; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 23:12:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by titan.klemm.apsfilter.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j58LC33M021048; Wed, 8 Jun 2005 23:12:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 23:12:03 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: "Matthew D. Fuller" Message-ID: <20050608211203.GA10649@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> References: <20050608145053.B10686@zoraida.natserv.net> <1118256882.76070.0.camel@server.mcneil.com> <20050608203513.GA2265@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> <20050608210343.GB64736@over-yonder.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050608210343.GB64736@over-yonder.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List , Andreas Klemm Subject: Re: Top broken in AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 05:05:35 -0000 On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 04:03:43PM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:35:13PM +0200 I heard the voice of > Andreas Klemm, and lo! it spake thus: > > > > I'd say normally you should expect to see what processes within > > delta t led to 0.0% idle. > > How would you do that, when the process no longer exists? ok this would mean then, that processors are soo/too quick nowadays in comparison to former times ? Or what does it tell us ? Although it really looks strange too me that the machine is completely busy but not showing anything. Even if I do a time make -j 8 buildworld I see only in rare cases display of up to 8 cc1 processes but mostly no display. as and ccp processes I see never. Its really strange and I'm not completely convinced that everything is right. If I remember right it was on exactly the same machine P3 1 GHz where this behaviour changed. I think it was between FreeBSD 4 and 5. This machine here (amd64) 3000+ I only have since a few months. Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm - Powered by FreeBSD 5.4 Need a magic printfilter today ? -> http://www.apsfilter.org/ From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 05:08:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5AE16A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 05:08:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CA443D1F for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 05:08:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BD672512EA; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 01:08:23 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 01:08:23 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Francisco Reyes Message-ID: <20050609050822.GA83686@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050608165110.O11353@zoraida.natserv.net> <20050608233027.GA94104@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050608220601.V12926@zoraida.natserv.net> <20050609034334.GA59345@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050608235701.M13526@zoraida.natserv.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050608235701.M13526@zoraida.natserv.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List , Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Ocaml or Unison port working for anyone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 05:08:24 -0000 --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:59:10PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jun 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > >>>http://pointyhat.freebsd.org. >=20 > >>Is there any additional info besides what's on that page for those who = may > >>want to help port maintainers? > > > >What "additional info" are you looking for? >=20 >=20 > For instance towards the bottom of the page I see a list of common=20 > errors, but when I looked at the log for the Ocaml build I did not see an= y=20 > of those.. maybe I missed it.. >=20 > Basically I would like to know if the port testing framework has any=20 > keywords or any structure that would aid in finding where=20 > the port build failed. Not really, but in this case the port has an incomplete pkg-plist, as you can see from the bottom of the log. Kris --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCp87GWry0BWjoQKURArIiAJ9lbm3b5+364p5NohKuvksvzQ0Z/ACfQdkd TMyfW5COp4Uv6mm7DlL/LcQ= =MbmO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 07:37:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A0216A423 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 07:37:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from artur@robart.pl) Received: from talisker.ckmedia.pl (talisker.ckmedia.pl [85.128.90.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A18EE43E0D for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 07:27:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from artur@robart.pl) Received: from HELMUT (boz49.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.29.41.49]) by talisker.ckmedia.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F96014D0B for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 09:26:56 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 09:26:53 +0200 From: Artur X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1829986263.20050609092653@robart.pl> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Freebsd on motherboard GIGABYTE GA-K8NF-9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Artur List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 07:37:14 -0000 Hi Did anybody have problems with freebsd 5.4 on GIGABYTE GA-K8NF-9? Did RAID Sata work ? Greets Artur From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 09:38:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D41D16A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 09:38:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-amd64@molecon.ru) Received: from amd64.molecon.ru (amd64.molecon.ru [213.219.245.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2ABA43D53 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 09:38:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-amd64@molecon.ru) Received: from [194.154.84.32] (helo=[10.20.5.22]) by amd64.molecon.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1DgJUC-0001V8-Uj for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 13:38:05 +0400 Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:36:22 +0400 From: Oleg Rusanov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0) Professional Organization: Molecon X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <4710048392.20050609133622@molecon.ru> To: freebsd-amd64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - amd64.molecon.ru X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - molecon.ru X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: elf_load_section: truncated ELF file X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Oleg Rusanov List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 09:38:21 -0000 freebsd-amd64. I have this error always, then i try to start any program. SSH also doesnt work and ending with this error after check password. Also Spamd doesnt work. But http and ftp and other services working good. This happened after i upgraded gcc 3.4 to 4.1 and tryed to reinstall perl 5.8.6. I am afraid to reboot system. I think server never go up after reboot Is it so? If yes, what i need to do? -- Regards, Oleg mailto:freebsd-amd64@molecon.ru From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 12:30:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F7416A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 12:30:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pferlizi@yahoo.com) Received: from web20825.mail.yahoo.com (web20825.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.227.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 560C943D48 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 12:30:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pferlizi@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 61009 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jun 2005 12:30:25 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=OrQF7n9har4cbo1i8nlDkwUxkgQnUzNi6rpNE/2/EL7/dqaKXOW9GQgralbd0p+MHUr5i1Ytyi8tpWKCMXrFSbs+E8yZYzkDq3HqOQaQXjTMrwQgR0c2XKs8XJGlvkCNmkiNixjilK81TnwKR2J+a1IJdCU4E99jYaa/UjP2Sxg= ; Message-ID: <20050609123025.61007.qmail@web20825.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [217.31.112.66] by web20825.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 05:30:25 PDT Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 05:30:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Pedro Greco Ferlizi To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Installing FreeBSD 5.4 on Compaq notebook... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 12:30:25 -0000 Hello everybody, I've tried a couple of times to install FreeBSD 5.4 on my Compaq Presario 3000 notebook but the system just gets to the boot options and shuts off immediately after I choose any of the boot options. Would someone know what is the problem and how to work it around? I think it is worth noting I am quite a newbie and thus not very confident on my abilities to tame this monster :-), meaning that your patience will be appreciated very much ;-). Thanks, Pedro Greco Ferlizi --------------------------------- Discover Yahoo! Find restaurants, movies, travel & more fun for the weekend. Check it out! From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 13:31:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD2E16A41C; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:31:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from s-utl01-sjpop.stsn.net (s-utl01-sjpop.stsn.net [72.254.0.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8DC243D1F; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:31:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from s-utl01-sjpop.stsn.net ([127.0.0.1]) by s-utl01-sjpop.stsn.net (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2005060906311524158 ; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 06:31:15 -0700 Received: from [10.0.1.5] ([10.1.191.21]) by s-utl01-sjpop.stsn.net; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 06:31:13 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20050607072232.GC30490@ip.net.ua> References: <20050603212555.GB36509@ip.net.ua> <20050605022447.GB26993@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050607072232.GC30490@ip.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <63165d15771f07f9778be0426dd4a211@FreeBSD.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: John Baldwin Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 22:59:22 -0700 To: Ruslan Ermilov X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) Cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: device speaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 13:31:16 -0000 On Jun 7, 2005, at 12:22 AM, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Hi David, > > On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 07:24:47PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: >> On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 12:25:55AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >>> Any reason not to enable "device speaker" on amd64? I just >>> tried compiling and kldloading the module, and spkrtest(8) >>> was quite happy and loud about it. >> >> No objections if it now works. >> > Fine. I'd like to repo-copy sys/i386/isa/spkr.c (and its header) > somewhere to sys/x86/ once the latter is ready. Do you have any > estimation when one gets ready? The correct thing to do is to go ahead and make a sys/x86/x86 to stick it in (I'm not sure it really belongs in an 'isa' subdirectory). The sys/x86 tree will probably grow as people start slowly moving things that are identical between i386 and amd64 over to it. -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 15:00:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A3316A436 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:00:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D598E43D53 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:00:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j59F0Wgq005885 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:00:32 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j59F0W9m005884; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:00:32 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:00:32 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <200506091500.j59F0W9m005884@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Shusnuke SHINOMIYA Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3445916A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:57:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org) Received: from www.freebsd.org (www.freebsd.org [216.136.204.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16EE643D1D for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:57:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nobody@FreeBSD.org) Received: from www.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j59Evwe5039317 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:57:58 GMT (envelope-from nobody@www.freebsd.org) Received: (from nobody@localhost) by www.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j59EvwNF039316; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:57:58 GMT (envelope-from nobody) Message-Id: <200506091457.j59EvwNF039316@www.freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 14:57:58 GMT From: Shusnuke SHINOMIYA To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: www-2.3 Cc: Subject: amd64/82071: incorrect -march's parameter to build 32bit libraries X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:00:34 -0000 >Number: 82071 >Category: amd64 >Synopsis: incorrect -march's parameter to build 32bit libraries >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: high >Responsible: freebsd-amd64 >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Thu Jun 09 15:00:32 GMT 2005 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Shusnuke SHINOMIYA >Release: FreeBSD/amd64 5.4-STABLE >Organization: >Environment: FreeBSD walnut.net.ss.titech.ac.jp 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Sat May 7 15:57:39 JST 2005 shino@walnut.net.ss.titech.ac.jp:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WALNUT amd64 >Description: In src/Makefile.inc1, -march's parameter is hard-coded as athlon-xp in order to build 32bit libraries. But, I think appropriate -march in Intel Xeon environment is prescott. BTW, nocona is not AMD CPU. However nocona is listed as `AMD CPUs' in share/examples/etc/make.conf. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: --- Makefile.inc1.orig Thu Jun 9 23:30:41 2005 +++ Makefile.inc1 Thu Jun 9 23:35:26 2005 @@ -205,7 +205,13 @@ # 32 bit world LIB32TMP= ${OBJTREE}${.CURDIR}/lib32 -LIB32PREFLAGS= -m32 -march=athlon-xp -msse2 -mfancy-math-387 -DCOMPAT_32BIT +LIB32PREFLAGS= -m32 -msse2 -mfancy-math-387 -DCOMPAT_32BIT +.if ${TARGET_CPUTYPE} == "nocona" +LIB32PREFLAGS+= -march=prescott +.else +LIB32PREFLAGS+= -march=athlon-xp +.endif + LIB32POSTFLAGS= -I${LIB32TMP}/usr/include \ -L${LIB32TMP}/usr/lib32 \ -B${LIB32TMP}/usr/lib32 >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 15:11:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3DC316A41C; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:11:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280D543D1F; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:11:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j59FBkVf088642; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:11:46 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua ([82.193.96.10]) by localhost (rocky.ipnet [82.193.96.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 03656-01; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:11:45 +0300 (EEST) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j59FBjlA088639 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:11:45 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.3/8.13.3) id j59FCDt9031540; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:12:13 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:12:12 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20050609151212.GB31367@ip.net.ua> References: <20050603212555.GB36509@ip.net.ua> <20050605022447.GB26993@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050607072232.GC30490@ip.net.ua> <63165d15771f07f9778be0426dd4a211@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RIYY1s2vRbPFwWeW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <63165d15771f07f9778be0426dd4a211@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ip.net.ua Cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: device speaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:11:48 -0000 --RIYY1s2vRbPFwWeW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi John, On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:59:22PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > On Jun 7, 2005, at 12:22 AM, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 07:24:47PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > >>On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 12:25:55AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > >>>Any reason not to enable "device speaker" on amd64? I just > >>>tried compiling and kldloading the module, and spkrtest(8) > >>>was quite happy and loud about it. > >> > >>No objections if it now works. > >> > >Fine. I'd like to repo-copy sys/i386/isa/spkr.c (and its header) > >somewhere to sys/x86/ once the latter is ready. Do you have any > >estimation when one gets ready? >=20 > The correct thing to do is to go ahead and make a sys/x86/x86 to stick=20 > it in (I'm not sure it really belongs in an 'isa' subdirectory). The=20 > sys/x86 tree will probably grow as people start slowly moving things=20 > that are identical between i386 and amd64 over to it. >=20 It sure is an ISA device, so I was thinking about sys/x86/isa/ or sys/x86/dev/spkr/. Which one do you like more? Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --RIYY1s2vRbPFwWeW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCqFxMqRfpzJluFF4RAhL+AJ9iU74DNLn5YPa1jH2zogT6v1mCCgCeMlm0 Zfzpz/W6y5/lJ9+j3oy0lgM= =i3xf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RIYY1s2vRbPFwWeW-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 15:19:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B6016A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:19:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul.richards@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B3943D4C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:19:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul.richards@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so137365wri for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 08:19:49 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=D7alUqaoCyARKVSknt7NHOKQfqsoPf3ab1XoqKwPQnOuw9oadnyAdt6crZN6UqJkrJ3+oWq40QBrsn97OGLmWqYlNhHWqTMQEgZmmndkghl1qkAGaD4i4mp74W+xhLEFIiO0heY1Q+TcqC1fRD4cW+k4vovF7seNh16JQ2QoaSY= Received: by 10.54.46.2 with SMTP id t2mr441612wrt; Thu, 09 Jun 2005 08:19:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.97.7 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 08:19:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:19:49 +0100 From: Paul Richards To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: nForce4 Ethernet X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Paul Richards List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 15:19:51 -0000 Hi, I am running FreeBSD 5.4 (amd64) and I have been attempting to get my nForce4 ethernet to work using the nvlan port. Out of the box the port did not recognise the PCI ID for the nForce4 and so I tweaked the source to get the module to load. The module now loads, I get an "nv0" device, and dmesg even shows the nvidia driver detecting my card's MAC address. When I configure the new device using ifconfig and attemt to ping something however, I get a series of "nv0: device timeout(..)" errors and nothing being transmitted. Can I ask if anyone has been able to get this device working? I am confident in writing C but do not know the FreeBSD kernel at all, perhaps it is obvious to someone what I need to change in the nvlan port. Would it be beneficial for me to upgrade from 5.4 to STABLE? PS. I previously posted about this problem to: http://groups-beta.google.com/group/comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc/browse_threa= d/thread/8ceb54a46bffa52a/3541ebb488b4d82e --=20 Paul Richards From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 16:14:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B929116A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:14:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from francisco@natserv.net) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6667843D53 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:14:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from francisco@natserv.net) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j59GE5Tq021763; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 12:14:06 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 12:14:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Artur In-Reply-To: <1829986263.20050609092653@robart.pl> Message-ID: <20050609121211.X20877@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <1829986263.20050609092653@robart.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd on motherboard GIGABYTE GA-K8NF-9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 16:14:07 -0000 On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Artur wrote: > GIGABYTE GA-K8NF-9? I don't see it listed at http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64/motherboards.html so nobody may have reported it working... check what chipset it has. If it's the nVididia Nforce3 250 it will not work with the RAID and possibly the network card. I just got a GA-K8NS and neither the LAN or RAID worked. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 16:47:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 954E816A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:47:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F1B243D1F for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:47:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [10.4.248.35] ([206.13.39.129]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j59Gqnfp075168; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 10:52:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <42A8724F.1000706@samsco.org> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 10:46:07 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050218 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Francisco References: <1829986263.20050609092653@robart.pl> <20050609121211.X20877@zoraida.natserv.net> In-Reply-To: <20050609121211.X20877@zoraida.natserv.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd on motherboard GIGABYTE GA-K8NF-9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 16:47:20 -0000 Francisco wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Artur wrote: > >> GIGABYTE GA-K8NF-9? > > > I don't see it listed at > http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64/motherboards.html > > so nobody may have reported it working... check what chipset it has. > If it's the nVididia Nforce3 250 it will not work with the RAID and > possibly the network card. > I just got a GA-K8NS and neither the LAN or RAID worked. It's an nForce4. I run FreeBSD 6-CURRENT on it as my normal desktop. The only thing that doesn't work is the ethernet port. The driver will pretend to attach and configure the device, but will panic on the first attempt to bring the PHY up. I somewhat understand the cause of this, but I haven't had time to dig into the miibus code and really figure it out. But otherwise, it works very well. It works less well in 5-STABLE due to infrastructure differences that are likely not to be merged back. Scott From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 17:15:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3729616A41F for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:15:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [65.205.34.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB86243D1F for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:15:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B387FB80F for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:15:08 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) In-Reply-To: <20050608211203.GA10649@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> References: <20050608145053.B10686@zoraida.natserv.net> <1118256882.76070.0.camel@server.mcneil.com> <20050608203513.GA2265@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> <20050608210343.GB64736@over-yonder.net> <20050608211203.GA10649@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-5-443670179; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: From: Vivek Khera Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:15:07 -0400 To: FreeBSD amd64 List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Top broken in AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 17:15:10 -0000 --Apple-Mail-5-443670179 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Jun 8, 2005, at 5:12 PM, Andreas Klemm wrote: > Even if I do a time make -j 8 buildworld I see only in rare cases > display of up to 8 cc1 processes but mostly no display. > as and ccp processes I see never. > > Its really strange and I'm not completely convinced that everything > is right. If I remember right it was on exactly the same machine > P3 1 GHz where this behaviour changed. I think it was between > FreeBSD 4 and 5. > Think for a moment about how top must work: it has to take a poll of some system status every fixed interval. if things are living shorter than that interval, you miss seeing them. However, the OS can tell you how much CPU time was used during that interval and such. ie, global counters kept by the kernel will show utilization, but the processes that used those resources won't show up unless you mange to look for them at just the right time. Vivek Khera, Ph.D. +1-301-869-4449 x806 --Apple-Mail-5-443670179-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 17:30:15 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E83516A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:30:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B0343D55 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:30:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j59HUFT4026590 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:30:15 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j59HUF5x026589; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:30:15 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:30:15 GMT Message-Id: <200506091730.j59HUF5x026589@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org From: Kris Kennaway Cc: Subject: Re: amd64/82071: incorrect -march's parameter to build 32bit libraries X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kris Kennaway List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 17:30:15 -0000 The following reply was made to PR amd64/82071; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kris Kennaway To: Shusnuke SHINOMIYA Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: amd64/82071: incorrect -march's parameter to build 32bit libraries Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:27:27 -0400 --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 02:57:58PM +0000, Shusnuke SHINOMIYA wrote: >=20 > >Number: 82071 > >Category: amd64 > >Synopsis: incorrect -march's parameter to build 32bit libraries > >Confidential: no > >Severity: serious > >Priority: high > >Responsible: freebsd-amd64 > >State: open > >Quarter: =20 > >Keywords: =20 > >Date-Required: > >Class: sw-bug > >Submitter-Id: current-users > >Arrival-Date: Thu Jun 09 15:00:32 GMT 2005 > >Closed-Date: > >Last-Modified: > >Originator: Shusnuke SHINOMIYA > >Release: FreeBSD/amd64 5.4-STABLE > >Organization: > >Environment: > FreeBSD walnut.net.ss.titech.ac.jp 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #0: Sat = May 7 15:57:39 JST 2005 shino@walnut.net.ss.titech.ac.jp:/usr/obj/usr/= src/sys/WALNUT amd64 >=20 > >Description: > In src/Makefile.inc1, -march's parameter is hard-coded as athlon-xp in or= der to build 32bit libraries. > But, I think appropriate -march in Intel Xeon environment is prescott. >=20 > BTW, nocona is not AMD CPU. However nocona is listed as `AMD CPUs' in sha= re/examples/etc/make.conf. Wasn't that already fixed? > >How-To-Repeat: >=20 > >Fix: > --- Makefile.inc1.orig Thu Jun 9 23:30:41 2005 > +++ Makefile.inc1 Thu Jun 9 23:35:26 2005 > @@ -205,7 +205,13 @@ > # 32 bit world > LIB32TMP=3D ${OBJTREE}${.CURDIR}/lib32 >=20 > -LIB32PREFLAGS=3D -m32 -march=3Dathlon-xp -msse2 -mfancy-math-387 -DCOMPA= T_32BIT > +LIB32PREFLAGS=3D -m32 -msse2 -mfancy-math-387 -DCOMPAT_32BIT > +.if ${TARGET_CPUTYPE} =3D=3D "nocona" > +LIB32PREFLAGS+=3D -march=3Dprescott > +.else > +LIB32PREFLAGS+=3D -march=3Dathlon-xp > +.endif This should probably go into bsd.cpu.mk somehow to avoid scattering -march logic elsewhere in the system. Kris --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCqHv+Wry0BWjoQKURAibMAKDE6jzQuDdeCfsppA/5Hr7f33nYZgCg3IxX AHBWQrCtFEbInX6QDx1jwnA= =XqZi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 17:34:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7159A16A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:34:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3F743D48 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:34:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j59HYQQd009325; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:34:29 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:34:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <42A8724F.1000706@samsco.org> Message-ID: <20050609133320.S21358@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <1829986263.20050609092653@robart.pl> <20050609121211.X20877@zoraida.natserv.net> <42A8724F.1000706@samsco.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd on motherboard GIGABYTE GA-K8NF-9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 17:34:30 -0000 On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Scott Long wrote: > It's an nForce4. I run FreeBSD 6-CURRENT on it as my normal desktop. The > only thing that doesn't work is the ethernet port. The original message asked about RAID (if I recall correctly). Do you know if the RAID is supported? > attempt to bring the PHY up. I think the motherboard I have also has the same Network card.. so you think it will be supported eventually on 6? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 17:43:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B8216A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:43:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B054A43D48 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:43:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [10.3.247.219] ([206.13.39.97]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j59HjrA6075543; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 11:46:47 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <42A87EBC.9080405@samsco.org> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 11:39:08 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050218 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Francisco Reyes References: <1829986263.20050609092653@robart.pl> <20050609121211.X20877@zoraida.natserv.net> <42A8724F.1000706@samsco.org> <20050609133320.S21358@zoraida.natserv.net> In-Reply-To: <20050609133320.S21358@zoraida.natserv.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd on motherboard GIGABYTE GA-K8NF-9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 17:43:52 -0000 Francisco Reyes wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Scott Long wrote: > >> It's an nForce4. I run FreeBSD 6-CURRENT on it as my normal desktop. >> The only thing that doesn't work is the ethernet port. > Ah, sorry, I generally forget that software RAID is a function that should work ;-) I have no idea if it does or not, Soeren Schmidt would be a good person to ask. > > The original message asked about RAID (if I recall correctly). Do you > know if the RAID is supported? > >> attempt to bring the PHY up. > > > I think the motherboard I have also has the same Network card.. so you > think it will be supported eventually on 6? I want to get it fixed, yes. However, I likely won't get it fixed for 6.0. If someone else out there wants to look at it, please do. Scott From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 17:57:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA4A516A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:57:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3ED43D53 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:57:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j59HvV18024960; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:57:31 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:57:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <42A87EBC.9080405@samsco.org> Message-ID: <20050609135551.X21453@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <1829986263.20050609092653@robart.pl> <20050609121211.X20877@zoraida.natserv.net> <42A8724F.1000706@samsco.org> <20050609133320.S21358@zoraida.natserv.net> <42A87EBC.9080405@samsco.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd on motherboard GIGABYTE GA-K8NF-9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 17:57:32 -0000 On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Scott Long wrote: > Ah, sorry, I generally forget that software RAID is a function that > should work ;-) I have no idea if it does or not, Soeren Schmidt > would be a good person to ask. Don't feel bad. Of the AMD64 motherboard list, few people report anything on RAID. :-) >>> attempt to bring the PHY up. > I want to get it fixed, yes. However, I likely won't get it fixed for > 6.0. If someone else out there wants to look at it, please do. Don't worry we will wait for you. :-) Besides, personally, I don't move production machines til X.3 releases. :) Although I did get a machine with 3 hard drives so I can play around with multiple releases, OSs. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 19:16:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DCE16A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:16:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from artur@robart.pl) Received: from talisker.ckmedia.pl (talisker.ckmedia.pl [85.128.90.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E0E843D1D for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:16:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from artur@robart.pl) Received: from HELMUT (boz49.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.29.41.49]) by talisker.ckmedia.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398B414D1F for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:16:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:16:54 +0200 From: Artur X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <535540057.20050609211654@robart.pl> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050609133320.S21358@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <1829986263.20050609092653@robart.pl> <20050609121211.X20877@zoraida.natserv.net> <42A8724F.1000706@samsco.org> <20050609133320.S21358@zoraida.natserv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re[2]: Freebsd on motherboard GIGABYTE GA-K8NF-9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Artur List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 19:16:59 -0000 Hi 2005-06-09 19:34 Francisco Reyes wrote: > The original message asked about RAID (if I recall correctly). Do you know > if the RAID is supported? Yes, i asked about raid Few hours ago i've ordered a machine with this motherboard and two sata disk and i like to connect it as raid-0 So i'm glad to hear that raid works :) > I think the motherboard I have also has the same Network card.. so you > think it will be supported eventually on 6? So in near future there's no way to run this NIC ? I can't install freebsd-current because i'm going to use my machine as small server so i need to buy another NIC Thank you for answers Greets Artur From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 19:40:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C096616A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:40:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from 62-15-207-140.inversas.jazztel.es (62-15-207-140.inversas.jazztel.es [62.15.207.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F0243D4C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:40:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from redesjm.local (orion.redesjm.local [192.168.254.16]) by 62-15-207-140.inversas.jazztel.es (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j59Jels4001413; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:40:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi@redesjm.local) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by redesjm.local (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j59JekGW094191; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:40:46 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from josemi@redesjm.local) From: Jose M Rodriguez To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 21:40:45 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <1829986263.20050609092653@robart.pl> <42A8724F.1000706@samsco.org> <20050609133320.S21358@zoraida.natserv.net> In-Reply-To: <20050609133320.S21358@zoraida.natserv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506092140.46398.josemi@redesjm.local> X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-3; AVE: 6.30.0.15; VDF: 6.30.0.207; host: antares.redesjm.local) Cc: Subject: Re: Freebsd on motherboard GIGABYTE GA-K8NF-9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 19:40:50 -0000 El Jueves, 9 de Junio de 2005 19:34, Francisco Reyes escribi=F3: > On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Scott Long wrote: > > It's an nForce4. I run FreeBSD 6-CURRENT on it as my normal > > desktop. The only thing that doesn't work is the ethernet port. > > The original message asked about RAID (if I recall correctly). Do you > know if the RAID is supported? > > > attempt to bring the PHY up. > > I think the motherboard I have also has the same Network card.. so > you think it will be supported eventually on 6? > As far I know, you must wait to RELENG_6 for support. I know sos@ have=20 a nForce4 board, but don't expect too quick development. There are also patches from sos@ to import HEAD ata in RELENG_5, but=20 maybe a little bit outdated (-n version). http://people.freebsd.org/~sos/ATA/ If you only need two SATA disks, Via RAID is more or less well=20 supported and funtcional. Asus A8V Deluxe working well here. =2D- josemi From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 20:31:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B448416A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 20:31:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DC543D55 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 20:31:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j59KV2wC019850; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:31:02 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:31:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Adriaan de Groot In-Reply-To: <200506071749.28840.groot@kde.org> Message-ID: <20050609162953.R21685@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <20050604234246.G69694@zoraida.natserv.net> <200506050949.54551.groot@kde.org> <20050607113123.R97707@zoraida.natserv.net> <200506071749.28840.groot@kde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which motherboard for RAID in AMD64? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 20:31:03 -0000 On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > Mmm, you could look that up in the motherboard list, but it's the GA-K8VT800. > That one has only the VIA embedded RAID. Just looked up the Motherboard list.. you did not mention the RAID works. May be worth updating the entry. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 20:37:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2941016A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 20:37:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-amd64@molecon.ru) Received: from amd64.molecon.ru (amd64.molecon.ru [213.219.245.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0FF43D4C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 20:37:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-amd64@molecon.ru) Received: from [194.154.84.32] (helo=[10.20.5.22]) by amd64.molecon.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.51 (FreeBSD)) id 1DgTmY-000Mdj-34 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:37:43 +0400 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:35:12 +0400 From: Oleg Rusanov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0) Professional Organization: Molecon X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <99389684.20050610003512@molecon.ru> To: freebsd-amd64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: freebsd-amd64@molecon.ru, freebsd-opennet@molecon.ru, info@molecon.ru, mysql@molecon.ru, oleg@molecon.ru X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - amd64.molecon.ru X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - molecon.ru X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Subject: What kind of MotherBoard is better for FreeBsd and linux? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Oleg Rusanov List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 20:37:48 -0000 Hello What kind of MotherBoard for Amd64 OPteron 252 or 264 processors is better for FreeBsd and linux? ----------------Amd64 OPteron 264 MBs------------- MSI K8D Master3 (MS-9161) 2.0 eATX AMD-8131 Supports up to processor stepping: E6 Tyan Thunder K8SD Pro (S2882-D) ----------------/Amd64 OPteron 264 MBs------------- -----------------Amd64 OPteron 252 MBs------------- MSI K8D Master3 (MS-9161) 1.0 eATX AMD-8131 Supports up to processor stepping: E4 Tyan Thunder K8SD Pro (S2882-D) 04UOT eATX AMD-8131 Supports up to processor stepping: E6 Thunder K8SR (S2881) 04MOA eATX AMD-8131 Supports up to processor stepping: E4 -----------------/Amd64 OPteron 252 MBs----------------------- -- Regards, Oleg mailto:freebsd-amd64@molecon.ru From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 20:52:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B87016A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 20:52:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from etoll@vipstructures.com) Received: from rodan.vipstructures.com (rodan.vipstructures.com [66.195.71.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57DDC43D5C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 20:52:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from etoll@vipstructures.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.vipstructures.com [127.0.0.1]) by rodan.vipstructures.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790AE1EE847 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:52:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mothra.vipstructures.com (mothra.vipstructures.com [192.168.1.3]) by rodan.vipstructures.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 452661EE835 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:52:06 -0400 (EDT) Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:52:31 -0400 Message-ID: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A944E4D5C@vip10-win2k.vipstructures.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? thread-index: AcVrp1Zx0WxMLXdTReGWEbEMyRy1NwBi6jpg From: "Toll, Eric" To: "Francisco Reyes" , "FreeBSD amd64 List" Cc: Subject: RE: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 20:52:08 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org=20 > [mailto:owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Francisco Reyes > Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2005 5:24 PM > To: FreeBSD amd64 List > Subject: Re: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? >=20 > On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Freddie Cash wrote: >=20 > Just finished installing the base OS. > In a previous post Eric Toll mentioned he got 3dm working in AMD64. >=20 > Eric, or anyone else that has 3dm working, how did you get it to work? > Which port? When I tried the 3dm port it said it was only for=20 > i386 architecture. Sorry for the time delay, I can't always watch the list... This is the one you want (below) Even though it says 9000 series, it works fine for my=20 8006 series card. I did not update my drivers or firmware, for fear of an incompatibility with the data already on the RAID set. Note it's 3DM2 and it's 64 Bit. =20 3ware 9000 Series 3DM2 FreeBSD sources for 64 Bit AMD - 9.2 release=20 Filename: 3dm-amd64-bsd-9_2.tgz =20 And here is a paste from my web gui Interface: =20 Controller Summary ID Model Serial # Firmware Driver Status 0 8006-2LP L18501A5140096 FE8S 1.05.00.068 1.50.01.002 OK Last updated Thu, Jun 09, 2005 04:46.15PM This page will automatically refresh every 5 minute(s) 3DM 2 version 2.03.00.028 (64 bit) Copyright (c) 1997-2004 3ware, Inc. All rights reserved. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 9 22:03:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DC916A41C for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:03:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0BC43D49 for ; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:03:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j59M3XOA010968; Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:03:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:03:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: "Toll, Eric" In-Reply-To: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A944E4D5C@vip10-win2k.vipstructures.com> Message-ID: <20050609180223.O22636@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <9BC86C67C3AF7646B9C5382020457A944E4D5C@vip10-win2k.vipstructures.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD amd64 List Subject: RE: 3ware cards work in AMD64 port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 22:03:35 -0000 On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Toll, Eric wrote: > This is the one you want (below) Even though it says 9000 > series, it works fine for my > 8006 series card. Ok will try. Downloaded the other one and didn't work. > I did not update my drivers or firmware, > for fear of an incompatibility with the data already on the > RAID set. Note it's 3DM2 and it's 64 Bit. I did just in case. No data was lost. > 3ware 9000 Series 3DM2 FreeBSD sources for 64 Bit AMD - 9.2 > release > Filename: 3dm-amd64-bsd-9_2.tgz Great. Will get it. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 10 10:42:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7315E16A41C; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:42:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from mailout2.pacific.net.au (mailout2.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9534743D6D; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:42:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (mailproxy2.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.87]) by mailout2.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j5AAgcdX013771; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:42:38 +1000 Received: from katana.zip.com.au (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246]) by mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j5AAgZx6018991; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:42:36 +1000 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:42:37 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@delplex.bde.org To: Ruslan Ermilov In-Reply-To: <20050609151212.GB31367@ip.net.ua> Message-ID: <20050610192451.F25104@delplex.bde.org> References: <20050603212555.GB36509@ip.net.ua> <20050605022447.GB26993@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050607072232.GC30490@ip.net.ua> <63165d15771f07f9778be0426dd4a211@FreeBSD.org> <20050609151212.GB31367@ip.net.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: device speaker X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:42:45 -0000 On Thu, 9 Jun 2005, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 10:59:22PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: >> On Jun 7, 2005, at 12:22 AM, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >>> Fine. I'd like to repo-copy sys/i386/isa/spkr.c (and its header) >>> somewhere to sys/x86/ once the latter is ready. Do you have any >>> estimation when one gets ready? >> >> The correct thing to do is to go ahead and make a sys/x86/x86 to stick >> it in (I'm not sure it really belongs in an 'isa' subdirectory). The >> sys/x86 tree will probably grow as people start slowly moving things >> that are identical between i386 and amd64 over to it. >> > It sure is an ISA device, so I was thinking about sys/x86/isa/ or > sys/x86/dev/spkr/. Which one do you like more? He should like neither. The only x86 dependency of the spkr device is its implementation. Its hardware implementation just needs an 8254 and an 8255 wired up to a speaker in much the same way as the original IBM PC, and its software implementation currently has PIO hard-coded. Some alphas apparently have identical hardware, since alpha/isa/clock.c uses the same code (modulo bugs (*)) as i386/isa/clock.c to beep the speaker. The spkr device should just work on these alphas. (*) Bugs in sysbeep(): i386 version: (1) Broken locking. (2) Broken as designed interface: The "pitch" (frequency) is actually the period in cycles at the frequency of the i8253 on the original IBM PC. Non-broken callers invert the pitch to give a period under the assumption that the i8254 freqency is the same as on the IBM PC's i8253 frequency. This interface is broken as designed, but some callers understand it. sysbeep() should scale the period to match the actual frequency. alpha version: (2a) Gets the broken as designed interface backwards by inverting the "pitch" Diff of the sysbeep() part of alpha/isa/clock.c with i386/isa/clock.c (a full diff didn't produce useful context due to gratuitous differences in the files): % --- 0 Fri Jun 10 09:38:29 2005 % +++ 1 Fri Jun 10 09:38:58 2005 % @@ -2,24 +2,13 @@ % sysbeep(int pitch, int period) % { % - /* % - * XXX: TurboLaser doesn't have an i8254 counter. % - * XXX: A replacement is needed, and another method % - * XXX: of determining this would be nice. % - */ % - if (hwrpb->rpb_type == ST_DEC_21000) { % - return (0); % - } % - % - mtx_lock_spin(&clock_lock); % + int x = splclock(); Here is the start of the broken locking for i386's. splclock() used to work but is now null. clock_lock is acquired later for i386's, but there is nothing except Giant to lock the call to acquire_timer2() (this function requires callers to lock for it and the lock should strictly be at least clock_lock since an access to the shared TIMER_MODE register is made). Locking everything by abusing clock_lock for the PPI would work but isn't done in either version. In practice, the PPI is probably locked by Giant. Locking is similarly broken in spkr.c. % % if (acquire_timer2(TIMER_SQWAVE|TIMER_16BIT)) % if (!beeping) { % /* Something else owns it. */ % - mtx_unlock_spin(&clock_lock); % + splx(x); % return (-1); /* XXX Should be EBUSY, but nobody cares anyway. */ % } % - % - if (pitch) pitch = TIMER_DIV(pitch); % - Here is the inversion of the "pitch" on alpha's. The TIMER_DIV() used to cause a trap for division by zero when users asked for an impossibly high frequency and callers correctly inverted the frequency to give a not so correct period of 0. Then the code was unimproved further by only avoiding the division for the trapping case, complete with formatting and logic style bugs. % + mtx_lock_spin(&clock_lock); % outb(TIMER_CNTR2, pitch); % outb(TIMER_CNTR2, (pitch>>8)); This is a perfectly illogical place to acquire clock_lock (on i386's). We didn't acquire clock_lock for the call to acquire_timer2() which needs some locking, but we acquire it here when no more locking is needed since acquire_timer2() gave us a long-lived exlusive lock. (It happens that exclusivity gives us safe access to TIMER_CNTR2, since although the i8254 has a common control/status register, it has separate counter registers and we have exclusive access to the only register that we access diectly. % @@ -27,8 +16,9 @@ % if (!beeping) { % /* enable counter2 output to speaker */ % - if (pitch) outb(IO_PPI, inb(IO_PPI) | 3); % + outb(IO_PPI, inb(IO_PPI) | 3); This is the final part of the unimproved alpha code to avoid division by zero. Here "pitch" is the period in i8254 cycles and is not subject to further bogus inversions. A period of 0 is non-physical but is no worse than a period of 1 -- even speakers of quality thousands of times better than a PC speaker can't usefully oscillate at > 1MHz. The hardware doesn't seem to care whether we write 0, 1 or any other preposterously small value for the period, so there is little reason to handle the (pitch == 0) case specially (with 2 style bugs). (There is a tiny reason: a "pitch" of 0 can result in 2 ways: the original arg may be 0, or we may convert an very large arg to 0 when we bogusly invert the arg; if the inversion were non-bogus, then we should keep track of the original arg so as to special-case only the case where we didn't invert it.) % beeping = period; % timeout(sysbeepstop, (void *)NULL, period); % } % + splx(x); % return (0); % } Bruce From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 10 11:13:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF08916A41C for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:13:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lexa@wincmd.ru) Received: from kunnilinux.birulevo.net (kunnilinux.birulevo.net [195.54.208.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36B8643D48 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:13:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lexa@wincmd.ru) Received: (qmail 4924 invoked by uid 210); 10 Jun 2005 15:09:39 +0400 Received: from 10.4.22.222 by kunnilinux (envelope-from , uid 201) with qmail-scanner-1.25st (clamdscan: 0.85.1/921. spamassassin: 3.0.3. perlscan: 1.25st. Clear:RC:1(10.4.22.222):. Processed in 0.05692 secs); 10 Jun 2005 11:09:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (10.4.22.222) by kunnilinux.birulevo.net with SMTP; 10 Jun 2005 15:09:39 +0400 Message-ID: <42A975E0.6010400@wincmd.ru> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:13:36 +0400 From: Tarasov Alexey User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: ru-ru, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 0523-6, 09.06.2005), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: Couldn't make kernel on FreeBSD 6.0-CURRENT under amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:13:41 -0000 Hello! I am trying to make kernel under amd64, but I have following error: > stage 3.1. making depencies > ... > /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/genassym.c:1 error: code mode `kernel' not > supported in 32bit mode What should I do to make kernel properly? Best regards, Alexey. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 10 13:22:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7906416A41C for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:22:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F31743D53 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:22:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5ADMKXG027192; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 09:22:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 09:22:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Oleg Rusanov In-Reply-To: <99389684.20050610003512@molecon.ru> Message-ID: <20050610092126.L32309@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <99389684.20050610003512@molecon.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-amd64 Subject: Re: What kind of MotherBoard is better for FreeBsd and linux? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 13:22:22 -0000 On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Oleg Rusanov wrote: > What kind of MotherBoard for Amd64 OPteron 252 or 264 processors is > better for FreeBsd and linux? Did you check http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64/motherboards.html for input? From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 10 15:58:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0FA16A41C for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:58:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [65.205.34.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F2743D49 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:58:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E5E7B80C for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:58:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <99389684.20050610003512@molecon.ru> References: <99389684.20050610003512@molecon.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-1-525464196; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: From: Vivek Khera Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 11:58:21 -0400 To: freebsd-amd64 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: What kind of MotherBoard is better for FreeBsd and linux? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:58:25 -0000 --Apple-Mail-1-525464196 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Jun 9, 2005, at 4:35 PM, Oleg Rusanov wrote: > Thunder K8SR > (S2881) > 04MOA eATX AMD-8131 Supports up to processor stepping: E4 > From experience, I have two systems with this board and it is 100% stable under heavy load if I disable the onboard NIC and use an intel NIC PCI card instead. I also have the LSI 320-2X RAID card on each system on the same PCI bus. Vivek Khera, Ph.D. +1-301-869-4449 x806 --Apple-Mail-1-525464196-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 10 20:01:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F33016A41C for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:01:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from groot@kde.org) Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF56543D48 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:01:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from groot@kde.org) Received: from odin.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.33] (helo=localhost.englishbreakfastnetwork.org) by pandora.cs.kun.nl (8.12.10/5.2) with ESMTP id j5AK1he6007807 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:01:43 +0200 (MEST) From: Adriaan de Groot To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:01:38 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.50 References: <99389684.20050610003512@molecon.ru> <20050610092126.L32309@zoraida.natserv.net> In-Reply-To: <20050610092126.L32309@zoraida.natserv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506102201.38517.groot@kde.org> X-Spam-Score: -1.399 () BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.48 on 131.174.33.4 Subject: Re: What kind of MotherBoard is better for FreeBsd and linux? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:01:47 -0000 On Friday 10 June 2005 15:22, Francisco Reyes wrote: > On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Oleg Rusanov wrote: > > What kind of MotherBoard for Amd64 OPteron 252 or 264 processors is > > better for FreeBsd and linux? > > Did you check http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64/motherboards.html for > input? I think the motherboards list could use a redesign so that it carries _more_ information. Right now one man's "Fully Functional" is another man's "Useless Junk" because there's not enough detail on the page to decide what's going on. Case in point: I just got an Asus A8N-SLI (an accident on the fscking university administration where my order for an A8V goes through 6 layers of clueless bureaucracy to get to the store -- I guess there was some Greek interpretation somewhere along the line) which is nForce4 based. Now, for 5-stable users, you get: 1) Won't boot 5.3-R amd64 2) In 5.3-R i386, is missing SATA RAID ('cause it's a Sil3114 which isn't supported on any platform as RAID, but does manage to squeak by as a regular SATA controller) and missing the onboard NIC (since nve is 6-CURRENT) Unfortunately I didn't have my 5.4-R CDs with me to try it with either. Still, this board is listed as "fully functional" on the motherboards page, while it clearly isn't. Maybe for the original reporter who wants neither SATA RAID nor networking it's fine. -- These are your friends - Adem GPG: FEA2 A3FE Adriaan de Groot From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 10 20:14:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BDDF16A41C for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:14:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hood.oook.cz (hood.oook.cz [212.27.205.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3561443D58 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:14:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hood.oook.cz (localhost.oook.cz [127.0.0.1]) by hood.oook.cz (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j5AKE1Rf022933 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:14:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from pav@localhost) by hood.oook.cz (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j5AKE1V4022828; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:14:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: hood.oook.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Pav Lucistnik To: Adriaan de Groot In-Reply-To: <200506102201.38517.groot@kde.org> References: <99389684.20050610003512@molecon.ru> <20050610092126.L32309@zoraida.natserv.net> <200506102201.38517.groot@kde.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-hOWm2LlmZwCz8qZVzWmI" Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:14:00 +0200 Message-Id: <1118434440.7847.5.camel@hood.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: What kind of MotherBoard is better for FreeBsd and linux? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 20:14:04 -0000 --=-hOWm2LlmZwCz8qZVzWmI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Adriaan de Groot p=ED=B9e v p=E1 10. 06. 2005 v 22:01 +0200: > On Friday 10 June 2005 15:22, Francisco Reyes wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Oleg Rusanov wrote: > > > What kind of MotherBoard for Amd64 OPteron 252 or 264 processors is > > > better for FreeBsd and linux? > > > > Did you check http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64/motherboards.html = for > > input? >=20 > I think the motherboards list could use a redesign so that it carries _mo= re_=20 > information. Right now one man's "Fully Functional" is another man's "Use= less=20 > Junk" because there's not enough detail on the page to decide what's goin= g=20 > on. That's what Notes field is for. > Case in point: I just got an Asus A8N-SLI (an accident on the fscking=20 > university administration where my order for an A8V goes through 6 layers= of=20 > clueless bureaucracy to get to the store -- I guess there was some Greek=20 > interpretation somewhere along the line) which is nForce4 based. Now, for= =20 > 5-stable users, you get: >=20 > 1) Won't boot 5.3-R amd64 > 2) In 5.3-R i386, is missing SATA RAID ('cause it's a Sil3114 which isn't= =20 > supported on any platform as RAID, but does manage to squeak by as a regu= lar=20 > SATA controller) and missing the onboard NIC (since nve is 6-CURRENT) >=20 > Unfortunately I didn't have my 5.4-R CDs with me to try it with either. S= till,=20 > this board is listed as "fully functional" on the motherboards page, whil= e it=20 > clearly isn't. Maybe for the original reporter who wants neither SATA RAI= D=20 > nor networking it's fine. There were a huge progress between 5.3-RELEASE and 5.4-RELEASE, and submitter claims his results with post-5.4 -STABLE. I will happily update the entry if you can provide feedback based on last release, ie. 5.4-RELEASE. 5.3-RELEASE just don't cut it anymore, sorry. --=20 Pav Lucistnik You can't expect to wield supreme executive power just 'cause some watery tart threw a sword at you. --=-hOWm2LlmZwCz8qZVzWmI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCqfSIntdYP8FOsoIRAmyJAJ9g+lkuA6L9xMGdVXJnOkyuOsNJ4QCgscWI Gvv5VLHQTwPwtuZXo5jwtSc= =47l6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-hOWm2LlmZwCz8qZVzWmI-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 11 07:42:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906FE16A41C for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 07:42:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@xbsd.org) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org (xbsd.org [82.233.2.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25FFA43D1F for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 07:42:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flz@xbsd.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E198711B9A; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:47:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.xbsd.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (srv1.xbsd.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09601-05; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:47:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cream.xbsd.org (cream.xbsd.org [192.168.42.6]) by smtp.xbsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D124B11B89; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:47:12 +0200 (CEST) From: Florent Thoumie To: Adriaan de Groot In-Reply-To: <200506102201.38517.groot@kde.org> References: <99389684.20050610003512@molecon.ru> <20050610092126.L32309@zoraida.natserv.net> <200506102201.38517.groot@kde.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-L6utk9OdoBr3mqyre51F" Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 09:42:13 +0200 Message-Id: <1118475733.679.7.camel@cream.xbsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at xbsd.org Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What kind of MotherBoard is better for FreeBsd and linux? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 07:42:20 -0000 --=-L6utk9OdoBr3mqyre51F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Vendredi 10 juin 2005 =E0 22:01 +0200, Adriaan de Groot a =E9crit : > Case in point: I just got an Asus A8N-SLI (an accident on the fscking=20 > university administration where my order for an A8V goes through 6 layers= of=20 > clueless bureaucracy to get to the store -- I guess there was some Greek=20 > interpretation somewhere along the line) which is nForce4 based. Now, for= =20 > 5-stable users, you get: >=20 > 1) Won't boot 5.3-R amd64 > 2) In 5.3-R i386, is missing SATA RAID ('cause it's a Sil3114 which isn't= =20 > supported on any platform as RAID, but does manage to squeak by as a regu= lar=20 > SATA controller) and missing the onboard NIC (since nve is 6-CURRENT) 5-STABLE is not 5.3-R. > Unfortunately I didn't have my 5.4-R CDs with me to try it with either. S= till,=20 > this board is listed as "fully functional" on the motherboards page, whil= e it=20 > clearly isn't. Maybe for the original reporter who wants neither SATA RAI= D=20 > nor networking it's fine. I'll be happy to add some information to the Notes column should you provide any that it doesn't contain already. If you read this page carefully, you'll see I already mentioned the on-board controller and the SATA-RAID chipset. Note that there are two on-board ethernet controllers (sk(4) and nve(4)), and the former is well supported on 5.4. --=20 Florent Thoumie flz@xbsd.org --=-L6utk9OdoBr3mqyre51F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCqpXVMxEkbVFH3PQRAgOdAJ9Z8ecjUeKX+BgWhC302uISkzQVqwCeKAjb NtUU24e5fEX8gKtwX6sf3cc= =Hc51 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-L6utk9OdoBr3mqyre51F-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 11 14:55:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FFBB16A41C for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 14:55:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from francisco@natserv.net) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DCB943D48 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 14:55:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from francisco@natserv.net) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5BEtYtk029581; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:55:34 -0400 Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:55:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: Adriaan de Groot In-Reply-To: <200506102201.38517.groot@kde.org> Message-ID: <20050611105202.C43143@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <99389684.20050610003512@molecon.ru> <20050610092126.L32309@zoraida.natserv.net> <200506102201.38517.groot@kde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What kind of MotherBoard is better for FreeBsd and linux? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 14:55:36 -0000 On Fri, 10 Jun 2005, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > I think the motherboards list could use a redesign so that it carries _more_ > information. I think the design is fine, BUT it should be more specific. People should report what they know to work. We should probably get rid of the "functional" and "fully functional"... OR define what "fully functional" means. To me fully functional would imply that all functions of the motherboard were tested: -ATA drives -SATA drives -Status of RAID if the machine has one. -LAN card -Sound For SMP boards it should be reported with at least 2 CPUs. Users should also report how much memory they tested with. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 11 18:31:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AAE16A41F for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:31:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from artur@robart.pl) Received: from talisker.ckmedia.pl (talisker.ckmedia.pl [85.128.90.84]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8703643D53 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:31:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from artur@robart.pl) Received: from HELMUT (bom154.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.29.28.154]) by talisker.ckmedia.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7179A14CC1 for ; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 20:31:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 20:31:50 +0200 From: Artur X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <556900035.20050611203150@robart.pl> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050609135551.X21453@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <1829986263.20050609092653@robart.pl> <20050609121211.X20877@zoraida.natserv.net> <42A8724F.1000706@samsco.org> <20050609133320.S21358@zoraida.natserv.net> <42A87EBC.9080405@samsco.org> <20050609135551.X21453@zoraida.natserv.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re[2]: Freebsd on motherboard GIGABYTE GA-K8NF-9 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Artur List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 18:31:57 -0000 Hello Francisco Reyes wrote: Subject: Freebsd on motherboard GIGABYTE GA-K8NF-9 > Don't feel bad. Of the AMD64 motherboard list, few people report anything > on RAID. :-) so i installed freebsd 5.4 and the raid on sata isn't working. Maybe i'm doing something wrong but freebsd saw it as 2 separates disk. Even i'd problem with 'bad geometry' :) But i run it without raid. ethernet card on motherboard didn't run too. I suppose i'm too lame to run it so i decide to buy another 'd-link' as my second eth device and final questuion: on http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.4R/hardware-amd64.html i didn't see on this list NIC D-Link DGE-530T but it does work under 5.4 as device 'sk0' should i report it somewhere ? Greets Artur