From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun May  8 02:34:58 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 277AD16A4E0; Sun,  8 May 2005 02:34:58 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from S2.cableone.net (smtp2.cableone.net [24.116.0.228])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C1CA043DB6; Sun,  8 May 2005 02:34:57 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net)
Received: from vixen42.local.lan (unverified [24.119.123.39]) 
	by S2.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S2) with ESMTP id 19089439 
	for multiple; Sat, 07 May 2005 20:03:53 -0700
Date: Sun, 8 May 2005 21:34:16 -0500
From: Vulpes Velox <v.velox@vvelox.net>
To: "Fafa Hafiz Krantz" <fteg@london.com>
Message-ID: <20050508213416.218abc9c@vixen42.local.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20050507110557.05A284BEAD@ws1-1.us4.outblaze.com>
References: <20050507110557.05A284BEAD@ws1-1.us4.outblaze.com>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 1, First 9, in=13, out=0, spam=0
X-External-IP: 24.119.123.39
X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net
cc: arch@freebsd.org
cc: questions@freebsd.org
cc: dnelson@allantgroup.com
Subject: Re: A beautiful dmesg! Maybe one day?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 02:34:58 -0000

On Sat, 07 May 2005 06:05:56 -0500
"Fafa Hafiz Krantz" <fteg@london.com> wrote:

> 
> Hey!
> 
> > I personally find the old methode a lot easier to read, compared
> > to the new one. If a change is wanted, why not make such a thing
> > like this a kernel option?
> 
> Are you referring to the indenting?
> Yeah your eyes would have to jump. A sacrifice necessary for order.

This has nothing to do with order. It is in the same order as before,
just in a less readable form. The extra line returns are nice thought.

> But the changes were not only in the indenting.
> They were logical changes to areas that seemed neglected.
> 
> You should do a diff!