From owner-freebsd-hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 21 16:26:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E34B16A41F for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:26:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from blake.polstra.com (blake.polstra.com [64.81.189.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8889443D45 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:26:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdp@polstra.com) Received: from strings.polstra.com (strings.polstra.com [64.81.189.67]) by blake.polstra.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j8LGQf1S095983 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:26:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@strings.polstra.com) Received: (from jdp@localhost) by strings.polstra.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j8LGQfMT000620; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:26:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.5 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20050914083438.GB2536@straylight.m.ringlet.net> Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:26:40 -0700 (PDT) From: John Polstra To: Peter Pentchev Cc: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Monitor mirror status via 'mirmon'? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hubs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD Distributions Hubs: mail sup ftp" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:26:43 -0000 On 14-Sep-2005 Peter Pentchev wrote: > In an out-of-band discussion related to ftp/www/cvsup.bg.FreeBSD.org, > George Danchev mentioned 'mirmon', a utility for monitoring the > 'up-to-dateness' of project mirror sites based on the timestamp of > a file touched hourly on the master site: > > http://www.cs.uu.nl/people/henkp/mirmon/ > > Would it be a good idea to run something like that for the FreeBSD > mirrors? I think a file with a timestamp updated hourly would not > put too much stress on the mirrors. Sorry to weigh in so late on this. I just got home from vacation. It sounds like a good idea to me. The extra load on the mirrors would be negligible. John