From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 07:01:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7443B16A41C for ; Sun, 29 May 2005 07:01:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: from relay01.pair.com (relay01.pair.com [209.68.5.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D9D1E43D48 for ; Sun, 29 May 2005 07:01:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 50903 invoked from network); 29 May 2005 07:01:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 29 May 2005 07:01:17 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 02:01:14 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack To: Josef Karthauser In-Reply-To: <20050524071620.GB20809@genius.tao.org.uk> Message-ID: <20050529015935.Y19575@odysseus.silby.com> References: <20050523085239.GF1705@genius.tao.org.uk> <000201c55fde$20e0a9a0$0a2a15ac@SMILEY> <20050524071620.GB20809@genius.tao.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Darren Pilgrim , net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iwi driver: Probes but no association (FreeBSD5.4). X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 07:01:19 -0000 On Tue, 24 May 2005, Josef Karthauser wrote: > I tried that: > > genius# ifconfig iwi0 up > genius# ifconfig iwi0 > iwi0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 I've seen the same problem - with certain access points (or a certain ordering of commands to bring the interface up?) the driver wouldn't associate. But, it always works on the APs I visit most frequently. :) I don't know if I'll be near the troublesome APs anytime soon to see if the recent change Damien made fixed the problem. Mike "Silby" Silbersack From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 10:21:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877A616A41F for ; Sun, 29 May 2005 10:21:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mathias@TeleCity.com) Received: from mail92.messagelabs.com (mail92.messagelabs.com [194.106.220.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BDA5C43D1F for ; Sun, 29 May 2005 10:21:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mathias@TeleCity.com) X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: Mathias@TeleCity.com X-Msg-Ref: server-3.tower-92.messagelabs.com!1117362270!6238455!1 X-StarScan-Version: 5.4.15; banners=telecity.com,-,- X-Originating-IP: [217.20.38.102] Received: (qmail 9247 invoked from network); 29 May 2005 10:24:30 -0000 Received: from lon3.telecity.net (HELO LON3.tcy.prv) (217.20.38.102) by server-3.tower-92.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 29 May 2005 10:24:30 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 11:20:14 +0100 Message-ID: <7DA012A4E4DA934FA17318A11F7547F5A6BD3F@LON3.tcy.prv> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: rfc2385 support Thread-Index: AcVkOAA7TEspM6JcQkGOpu5mDodsQw== From: To: Subject: rfc2385 support X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 10:21:38 -0000 Hi=20guys, I'm=20trying=20to=20find=20out=20if=20any=20release=20of=20FreeBSD=20suppo= rts=20MD5=20as=20per rfc2385.=20I=20will=20be=20using=20it=20with=20quagga=20on=20BGP=20session= =20authentication. Regards Mathias, ______________________________________________________________________ DISCLAIMER This=20e-mail=20is=20intended=20only=20for=20the=20use=20of=20the=20addres= sees=20named=20above=20and=20may=20be=20confidential.=20If=20you=20are=20n= ot=20an=20addressee=20you=20must=20not=20use=20any=20information=20contain= ed=20in=20nor=20copy=20it=20nor=20inform=20any=20person=20other=20than=20T= eleCity=20or=20the=20addressees=20of=20its=20existence=20or=20contents.=20= If=20you=20have=20received=20this=20e-mail=20in=20error,=20please=20contac= t=20the=20TeleCity=20IT=20department=20on=20+44=20(0)=20161=20232=203220=20= or=20by=20email=20at=20techsupport@telecity.com.=20Internet=20communicatio= ns=20cannot=20be=20guaranteed=20100%=20secure,=20you=20should=20therefore=20= take=20this=20potential=20lack=20of=20security=20into=20consideration=20wh= en=20emailing=20us=20as=20we=20do=20not=20accept=20legal=20responsibility=20= for=20the=20security=20of=20the=20contents=20of=20this=20or=20other=20emai= ls.=20Whilst=20TeleCity=20take=20measures=20to=20prevent=20any=20virus=20c= ontamination=20of=20our=20computer=20systems,=20recipients=20of=20emails=20= should=20always=20ensure=20that=20they=20take=20their=20own=20precautions=20= to=20avoid=20virus=20contamination. ______________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 29 11:50:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F092A16A41C for ; Sun, 29 May 2005 11:50:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lee@wildcard.net.uk) Received: from ded.office.wildcard.net.uk (gw.office.wildcard.net.uk [82.138.232.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA8843D48 for ; Sun, 29 May 2005 11:50:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lee@wildcard.net.uk) Received: from gate.wildcard.net.uk (gate.internal.office.wildcard.net.uk [192.168.15.3]) by ded.office.wildcard.net.uk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4TBo443014155; Sun, 29 May 2005 12:50:09 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from lee@wildcard.net.uk) Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.0.20050529124520.01a6d308@mail.wildcardinternet.co.uk> X-Sender: ljohns@mail.wildcardinternet.co.uk X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.1.0.6 Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 12:50:21 +0100 To: , From: Lee Johnston In-Reply-To: <7DA012A4E4DA934FA17318A11F7547F5A6BD3F@LON3.tcy.prv> References: <7DA012A4E4DA934FA17318A11F7547F5A6BD3F@LON3.tcy.prv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: rfc2385 support X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 11:50:13 -0000 Hi Mathias, I've managed to get Quagga + FreeBSD 4.x/5.x to establish BGP sessions with Cisco routers with MD5 password authentication. You'll need to ensure you build Quagga with MD5 support (the current port gives you the option during build), compile your kernel with relevant TCP_SIGNATURE and crypto support (options vary depending on if your using 4.x/5.x), use setkey, and add the usual neighbor x.x.x.x password yyyy to Quagga. Let me know if you need any more info/help.. Regards, Lee. At 11:20 29/05/2005, Mathias@TeleCity.com wrote: >Hi guys, > >I'm trying to find out if any release of FreeBSD supports MD5 as per >rfc2385. I will be using it with quagga on BGP session authentication. > >Regards >Mathias, > > >______________________________________________________________________ >DISCLAIMER >This e-mail is intended only for the use of the addressees named above and >may be confidential. If you are not an addressee you must not use any >information contained in nor copy it nor inform any person other than >TeleCity or the addressees of its existence or contents. If you have >received this e-mail in error, please contact the TeleCity IT department >on +44 (0) 161 232 3220 or by email at techsupport@telecity.com. Internet >communications cannot be guaranteed 100% secure, you should therefore take >this potential lack of security into consideration when emailing us as we >do not accept legal responsibility for the security of the contents of >this or other emails. Whilst TeleCity take measures to prevent any virus >contamination of our computer systems, recipients of emails should always >ensure that they take their own precautions to avoid virus contamination. >______________________________________________________________________ >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Lee @ Wildcard Internet t: (0845) 165 1510 f: (0845) 165 1511 m: (07795) 423 617 e: lee@wildcard.net.uk Web Development - Domains - Hosting - Co-location - Dedicated Servers From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 05:56:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBAA816A41C for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 05:56:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from timt@sharktech.net) Received: from sharktech.net (usr1-123.sharktech.net [66.90.92.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC4343D68 for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 05:56:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from timt@sharktech.net) Received: (qmail 46021 invoked from network); 30 May 2005 05:56:00 -0000 Received: from localhost.ushells.net (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ushells.net with SMTP; 30 May 2005 05:56:00 -0000 Received: from 69.146.26.92 ([69.146.26.92]) by webmail.sharktech.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 00:56:00 -0500 Message-ID: <1117432560.429aaaf0daee7@webmail.sharktech.net> Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 00:56:00 -0500 From: timt@sharktech.net To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 69.146.26.92 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Intel SRCS16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 05:56:03 -0000 Hello, I'm running a Dual Opteron 244 on a Tyan S2882, Intel SRCS16 Raid Controller with 5x200GB WD200 7.2KRPM HDD's RAID5. The I/O performance is EXTREMELY slow, and sometime system is simply inaccessable taking a minute to exit from writting a file! When I changed to Raid0 i/o increased noticebly. I tried using Windows 2000 on the system and i/o performance was way better than under FreeBSD. Is their a current problem with the MegaRaid driver? Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 08:42:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36F3D16A41C for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 08:42:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from samspeedu@mail.ru) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBF9843D48 for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 08:42:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from samspeedu@mail.ru) Received: from [213.129.119.20] (port=1350 helo=192.168.168.7) by mx2.mail.ru with esmtp id 1Dcfr9-0003dJ-00 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 May 2005 12:42:43 +0400 Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 12:42:14 +0400 From: Andrey Smagin X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62r) Organization: DiP X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <862239983.20050530124214@mail.ru> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Bridge on WiFi cards strange work X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: SAMU List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 08:42:46 -0000 Hello ALL 192.168.1.4 can ping only 192.168.1.200. All another PC(exclude 192.168.1.200) can't ping only 192.168.1.4. Firewall in allow ip from any to any. Switching cable and ssid for acx0 and ath0 have no effect - 192.168.1.4 not pinging outside server 1 anyway. NAT(with PPP) on Server1 work fine for 192.168.1.4 as and for all another. acx0 ath0 fxp0 in promisc mode, viewed in log. I have server with 3NIC in Server1(FBSD-6.0-CUR-1week): Intel PILA PRO DWL-G520 DWL-520+ and 2NIC in Server2(FBSD-6.0-CUR-1week): Intel PILA PRO DWL-G520 in sysctl.conf on Sever1 ....bridge.config=fxp0:1,ath0:1,acx0:1 ....bridge.enable=1 in sysctl.conf on Sever2 ....bridge.config=fxp0:1,ath0:1 ....bridge.enable=1 net topology 192.168.3.200 192.168.1.200 192.168.1.4(DWL-520+) ~~~ (DWL-520+ acx0)Server1(fxp0)===192.168.1.2(rl0) (DWL-G520 ath0 192.168.2.200) ~ ~ (DWL-G520 ath0 192.168.2.100) Server2 (fxp0 192.168.1.100) || || 192.168.1.5 ===== Switch(Acorp 5Port)===== 192.168.1.1 -- Best regards, Andrey mailto:samspeedu@mail.ru From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 09:34:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2ED316A41C for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 09:34:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received: from mp2.macomnet.net (mp2.macomnet.net [195.128.64.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 022F643D1F for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 09:34:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Received-SPF: pass (mp2.macomnet.net: domain of maxim@macomnet.ru designates 127.0.0.1 as permitted sender) receiver=mp2.macomnet.net; client_ip=127.0.0.1; envelope-from=maxim@macomnet.ru; Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp2.macomnet.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4U9YMnL027053; Mon, 30 May 2005 13:34:22 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from maxim@macomnet.ru) Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 13:34:22 +0400 (MSD) From: Maxim Konovalov To: Andrey Smagin In-Reply-To: <862239983.20050530124214@mail.ru> Message-ID: <20050530133303.Y82220@mp2.macomnet.net> References: <862239983.20050530124214@mail.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bridge on WiFi cards strange work X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 09:34:24 -0000 What does sysctl net.inet.ip.check_interface say? Does switching it off helps? -- Maxim Konovalov From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 11:02:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8148B16A41C for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 11:02:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C0F43D53 for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 11:02:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4UB1x7r030052 for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 11:01:59 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j4UB1xAu030046 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Mon, 30 May 2005 11:01:59 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 11:01:59 GMT Message-Id: <200505301101.j4UB1xAu030046@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 11:02:00 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2005/05/19] ia64/81284 net Unaligned Reference with pf on 5.4/IA64 1 problem total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/07/11] kern/54383 net [nfs] [patch] NFS root configurations wit 1 problem total. From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 12:15:36 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B6216A41C for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 12:15:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olivier_casasole@yahoo.fr) Received: from web26503.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web26503.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.176.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B56843D48 for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 12:15:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olivier_casasole@yahoo.fr) Received: (qmail 80203 invoked by uid 60001); 30 May 2005 12:15:35 -0000 Message-ID: <20050530121535.80201.qmail@web26503.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [137.73.11.190] by web26503.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 30 May 2005 14:15:34 CEST Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 14:15:34 +0200 (CEST) From: Olivier Casasole To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: mping X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 12:15:36 -0000 Hi, I would like to use mping under FreeBSD 5.3. mping seems to be installed in /kame directory but it doesn't work. Do you know why? Or do you know where i can find a version of mping? Thanks, Olivier _____________________________________________________________________________ Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 1 Go d'espace de stockage pour vos mails, photos et vidéos ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 18:34:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59CA16A41C for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 18:34:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp) Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp [202.249.10.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D13D43D49 for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 18:34:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp) Received: from ocean.jinmei.org (unknown [2001:4f8:3:bb:5ce6:dabf:fcc2:de34]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA32215218; Tue, 31 May 2005 03:37:06 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 03:35:11 +0900 Message-ID: From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= To: Olivier Casasole In-Reply-To: <20050530121535.80201.qmail@web26503.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <20050530121535.80201.qmail@web26503.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan. MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mping X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 18:34:17 -0000 >>>>> On Mon, 30 May 2005 14:15:34 +0200 (CEST), >>>>> Olivier Casasole said: > I would like to use mping under FreeBSD 5.3. > mping seems to be installed in /kame directory but it > doesn't work. > Do you know why? > Or do you know where i can find a version of mping? Please be more specific. As far as I know, pure FreeBSD 5.3 does not contain the directory "/kame". (not at least on my 5.4-RELEASE box). What do you mean by "/kame directory"? Also, "it doesn't work" means almost nothing for getting useful help. Please be more specific about the symptom, e.g, by copy-and-pasting the command-line execution of mping and the results. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 21:38:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1D616A41F for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 21:38:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from timt@sharktech.net) Received: from sharktech.net (usr1-123.sharktech.net [66.90.92.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6450643D48 for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 21:38:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from timt@sharktech.net) Received: (qmail 92386 invoked from network); 30 May 2005 21:38:27 -0000 Received: from localhost.ushells.net (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by localhost.ushells.net with SMTP; 30 May 2005 21:38:27 -0000 Received: from 69.146.27.144 ([69.146.27.144]) by webmail.sharktech.net (IMP) with HTTP for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 16:38:27 -0500 Message-ID: <1117489107.429b87d32ac3a@webmail.sharktech.net> Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 16:38:27 -0500 From: timt@sharktech.net To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 X-Originating-IP: 69.146.27.144 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel SRCS16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 21:38:29 -0000 I may have not added the complete details in the last thread: O/S FreeBSD5.4-RELEASE AMD64 Dual AMD Opteron 244 Tyan S2882 2GB DDR PC3200 Intel SRCS16 PCI-X (RAID-5 configured) 5 x 200GB WD 7.2KRPM SATA dd results shown: dd if=/dev/amrd0s1e of=/dev/null 7082+0 records in 7082+0 records out 3625984 bytes transferred in 3.926469 secs (923472 bytes/sec) Performance is way better when changing to Raid-0, and performance Raid-5 on Windows 2000 is much better as well. Thanks ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 23:25:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861A016A41C; Mon, 30 May 2005 23:25:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thompsa@fud.org.nz) Received: from heff.fud.org.nz (60-234-149-201.bitstream.orcon.net.nz [60.234.149.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2781043D1D; Mon, 30 May 2005 23:25:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thompsa@fud.org.nz) Received: from thompsa by heff.fud.org.nz with local (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1Dctdq-0002GV-4T; Tue, 31 May 2005 11:25:54 +1200 Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 11:25:54 +1200 From: Andrew Thompson To: net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050530232554.GA8674@heff.fud.org.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: Andrew Thompson Cc: pf@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: RFC: if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 23:25:55 -0000 Hi, I am looking for testers and code review for if_bridge, the bridge implementation from NetBSD (and OpenBSD). The patch and instructions can be found at: http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/ Highlights include: - 802.1d spanning tree support - management of the bridge MAC table - view bridged packets with bpf(4) - good firewall support I am especially interested in people who can test !i386, and users with existing STP networks. I am looking forward to getting your feedback! Andrew From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 23:40:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2E3D16A41C for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 23:40:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC95D43D48 for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 23:40:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1114351455; Mon, 30 May 2005 16:40:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 16:40:29 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Olivier Casasole Message-ID: <20050530234029.GA51099@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050526170724.70066.qmail@web26508.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050526170724.70066.qmail@web26508.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mping X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 23:40:31 -0000 --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 07:07:24PM +0200, Olivier Casasole wrote: >=20 > Hi all, >=20 > I would like to use mping under FreeBSD 5.3. > mping seems to be installed in /kame directory but it > doesn't work. > Do you know why? FreeBSD has no /kame directory. I'm guessing this is something you have installed yourself from the kame project. Kris --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCm6RtWry0BWjoQKURArSZAKDOJYHTrPbFK1cG8gBtk0huMge0pwCcDRGG aVtN+w+bQMz0+ApZDY97E/g= =eXbi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j-- From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 04:26:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3C8016A41C for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 04:26:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from samspeedu@mail.ru) Received: from mx1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8522343D1D for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 04:26:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from samspeedu@mail.ru) Received: from [213.129.119.20] (port=1168 helo=192.168.168.7) by mx1.mail.ru with esmtp id 1DcyL3-0004h0-00 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 08:26:50 +0400 Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 08:26:21 +0400 From: Andrey Smagin X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62r) Organization: DiP X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <772038633.20050531082621@mail.ru> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050530133303.Y82220@mp2.macomnet.net> References: <862239983.20050530124214@mail.ru> <20050530133303.Y82220@mp2.macomnet.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Bridge on WiFi cards strange work X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: SAMU List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 04:26:52 -0000 MK> What does sysctl net.inet.ip.check_interface say? Does switching it MK> off helps? net.inet.ip.check_interface was 0 Switch it to 1 have no effect. I think WiFi devices can hear each other through antenna. But devices have different SSID and IMHO can't have loop. -- Best regards, Andrey mailto:samspeedu@mail.ru From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 06:48:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F6E016A41C; Tue, 31 May 2005 06:48:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay.bestcom.ru (relay.bestcom.ru [217.72.144.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C505943D53; Tue, 31 May 2005 06:48:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (root@cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by relay.bestcom.ru (8.13.1/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j4V6mTVG044936 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 31 May 2005 10:48:30 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j4V6mTsb035180 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 31 May 2005 10:48:29 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j4V6mSK7035179; Tue, 31 May 2005 10:48:28 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 10:48:28 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Andrew Thompson Message-ID: <20050531064828.GA35092@cell.sick.ru> References: <20050530232554.GA8674@heff.fud.org.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050530232554.GA8674@heff.fud.org.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version devel-20050125, clamav-milter version 0.80ff on relay.bestcom.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 06:48:33 -0000 Andrew, first big thanks for your work! On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:25:54AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote: A> I am looking for testers and code review for if_bridge, the bridge A> implementation from NetBSD (and OpenBSD). A> A> Highlights include: A> - 802.1d spanning tree support Sorry, I can't test at the moment. But I'd like to express my small wish about your future import to FreeBSD. When I have looked at it in NetBSD source tree, I've noticed that STP support is quite separate from the if_bridge itself. I like this very much. And it will be very useful if in FreeBSD the STP kernel "library" won't depend on if_bridge at all. I'm asking for this because I'd like to have STP support to ng_bridge(4) using the same engine as if_bridge does. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 10:32:54 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50DB16A41C for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 10:32:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vanyushenkov@yashz.ru) Received: from gw.yashz.ru (gw.yashz.yaroslavl.ru [80.92.2.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0AAF243D1F for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 10:32:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vanyushenkov@yashz.ru) Received: (qmail 33032 invoked by uid 0); 31 May 2005 10:32:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dinadm) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 31 May 2005 10:32:48 -0000 From: =?koi8-r?B?98HOwNvFzsvP1yDhzMXL08XK?= To: Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 14:31:31 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcVly+kRcVQ+Ks1PQ1uwY/9FwqDZHw== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4942.400 X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 2.0.0 [0125], KAS/Release X-Spamtest-Info: No License Message-Id: <20050531103252.0AAF243D1F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: novell through freebsd firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 10:32:54 -0000 Hi all! I'm sorry for my poor English. I have Novell netware clients version 4.91 working over ip on windows 2000 boxes which connect to novell netware servers. Everything is good when clients and servers are on the same subnet. I want to separate clients from servers by FreeBSD firewall with 2 interfaces, one ifece is in one subnet, another iface is in another subnet and nat. When client sends request to 239.255.255.253.svrloc udp And 224.0.1.22.svrloc udp It does not receive answer. I tuned freebsd box to forward multicast packets, after that freebsd receives request on one iface, then after nat is Forwards in to second iface and sends multicast packet to servers. Servers send answers to second freebsd iface And do not forward them to first iface. Could anyone can help me please Vanyushenkov alexey Russia From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 11:06:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D1B16A420 for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 11:06:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olivier_casasole@yahoo.fr) Received: from web26501.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web26501.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.146.176.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A34AC43D4C for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 11:06:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olivier_casasole@yahoo.fr) Received: (qmail 43130 invoked by uid 60001); 31 May 2005 11:06:52 -0000 Message-ID: <20050531110652.43128.qmail@web26501.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [137.73.11.190] by web26501.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2005 13:06:52 CEST Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 13:06:52 +0200 (CEST) From: Olivier Casasole To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: mping X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 11:06:56 -0000 Hi, I would like to use mping under FreeBSD 5.3. I also installed Kame. mping seems to be installed in /kame directory but it doesn't work. When i do the mping command i obtain: "mping: command not found" Do you know why? Or do you know where i can find a version of mping? Thanks, Olivier _____________________________________________________________________________ Découvrez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail : 1 Go d'espace de stockage pour vos mails, photos et vidéos ! Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur http://fr.mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 11:07:49 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6095916A42A for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 11:07:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from french.linuxian@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E379143D1F for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 11:07:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from french.linuxian@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 12so1826746nzp for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 04:07:48 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=SWnkrFtY31o8WNPO+pjWacwrsFMVxKIjKA3E4CoBPow0w6kmdXlK2kB7Ku0P34F41eIInL2OXHTuawZLrHCV8WKru2lrrMy7ssIgqvQQkDjaEoj3reDfKj1xkPLPQuDKebHu0EGPRT6UJN1lYR3VlBzsHIim4049tASyFO6Dkd8= Received: by 10.36.178.20 with SMTP id a20mr858234nzf; Tue, 31 May 2005 04:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.58.12 with HTTP; Tue, 31 May 2005 04:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3727392705053104072e9547df@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 07:07:48 -0400 From: Aziz Kezzou To: freebsd-hackers , freebsd-net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Routing loop + raw IP packets : looking for clues ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Aziz Kezzou List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 11:07:49 -0000 Hi all, For the purpose of my project I am simpulating a 3-hop network with QEMU on my workstation, as follows : |---------------------------------| =20 |-------------------------------| =20 |-------------------------------------| |Daemon1(user process)|---tun0---| Daemon 2 on QEMU |---tun1---| Daemon 3 (user porcess) | |---------------------------------| =20 |-------------------------------| =20 |-------------------------------------| My workstation is running FC3 and QEMU is running FreeBSD5.3 I am tryning to exchange raw IP packets between daemon 1 and 3 through daemon 2. I've succeded to by pass the system routing and get packets sent from daemon 1 to daemon 2 and from daemon 2 to daemon 3. BUT, on daemon 3 I can not receive them ??!! However, when I listen with tcpdump on tun0 and tun1 I see the packets travelling as expected : daemon1(192.168.0.1)------>(192.168.0.2)daemon2(192.168.1.2)------> daemon3(192.168.0.2) What could prevent me from receiving packets intended for daemon 3? I am suspecting some hard coded rule to prevent routing loops (which is my case) in the Linux kernel, am I on the right track ? Note : I disabled completely my firewalls, so this could not be the reason. Any help is highly appreciated. -aziz From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 12:14:13 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4767A16A41C; Tue, 31 May 2005 12:14:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tyler@tamu.edu) Received: from smtp-relay.tamu.edu (smtp-relay.tamu.edu [165.91.143.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01BA843D58; Tue, 31 May 2005 12:14:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tyler@tamu.edu) Received: from [128.194.150.11] (vpn-11.cs.tamu.edu [128.194.150.11]) by smtp-relay.tamu.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j4VCE76v075913; Tue, 31 May 2005 07:14:08 -0500 (CDT) In-Reply-To: <20050530232554.GA8674@heff.fud.org.nz> References: <20050530232554.GA8674@heff.fud.org.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "R. Tyler Ballance" Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 07:14:47 -0500 To: Andrew Thompson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) Received-SPF: pass (smtp-relay.tamu.edu: 128.194.150.11 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism) Cc: pf@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 12:14:13 -0000 I'll throw another hme interface in my Sun Ultra 2 some time later today to test it out some more. Do you have any specific "tests" you would want us to run the if_bridge code through? Just simplistic bridging of two networks, or are there any bells and whistles you want me(/us) to setup as well? Other than that, do you know if the new OPENBSD_3_7 pf code will work with this patch? Thanks a lot for working on it! :) -R. Tyler Ballance On May 30, 2005, at 6:25 PM, Andrew Thompson wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking for testers and code review for if_bridge, the bridge > implementation from NetBSD (and OpenBSD). > > The patch and instructions can be found at: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/ > > Highlights include: > - 802.1d spanning tree support > - management of the bridge MAC table > - view bridged packets with bpf(4) > - good firewall support > > > I am especially interested in people who can test !i386, and users > with > existing STP networks. I am looking forward to getting your feedback! > > > Andrew > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 13:11:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C2C16A41C for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 13:11:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keiichi@iijlab.net) Received: from omgo.iij.ad.jp (omgo.iij.ad.jp [202.232.30.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBAA43D1D for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 13:11:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keiichi@iijlab.net) Received: OTM-MO id j4VDB4Nh004204; Tue, 31 May 2005 22:11:04 +0900 (JST) Received: OTM-MIX0 id j4VDB35D021932; Tue, 31 May 2005 22:11:03 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (keiichi00.osaka.iij.ad.jp [192.168.64.45]) by jc-smtp.iij.ad.jp (JC-SMTP/jc-smtp) id j4VDB3pt015291; Tue, 31 May 2005 22:11:03 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 22:11:11 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20050531.221111.58893503.keiichi@iijlab.net> To: olivier_casasole@yahoo.fr From: Keiichi SHIMA In-Reply-To: <20050531110652.43128.qmail@web26501.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> References: <20050531110652.43128.qmail@web26501.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.1.50 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mping X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 13:11:06 -0000 Hi, From: Olivier Casasole Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 13:06:52 +0200 (CEST) > > I would like to use mping under FreeBSD 5.3. > I also installed Kame. > mping seems to be installed in /kame directory but it > doesn't work. > > When i do the mping command i obtain: > "mping: command not found" Do you see the same message even if you specify the command with full path name? BTW, It seems this problem is a KAME specific problem. Could you send your question to snap-users@kame.net, if you still have the problem. --- Keiichi SHIMA IIJ Research Laboratory KAME Project From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 17:13:59 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A39B016A41C for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 17:13:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Anumita.Biswas@netapp.com) Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B4743D4C for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 17:13:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Anumita.Biswas@netapp.com) Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com (10.57.156.124) by mx2.netapp.com with ESMTP; 31 May 2005 10:13:59 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.93,152,1115017200"; d="scan'208"; a="222073494:sNHT23147904" Received: from svlexc03.hq.netapp.com (svlexc03.corp.netapp.com [10.57.156.149]) by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id j4VHDi5X027139; Tue, 31 May 2005 10:13:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from burgundy.hq.netapp.com ([10.56.10.66]) by svlexc03.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Tue, 31 May 2005 10:13:44 -0700 Received: from magenta.hq.netapp.com ([10.56.11.84]) by burgundy.hq.netapp.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Tue, 31 May 2005 10:13:44 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 10:13:43 -0700 Message-ID: <637A278D8D0DBC438EA5E75C6E1818B902E619F3@magenta.hq.netapp.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: novell through freebsd firewall Thread-Index: AcVly+kRcVQ+Ks1PQ1uwY/9FwqDZHwAMpBtg From: "Biswas, Anumita" To: "?????????? ???????" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 May 2005 17:13:44.0118 (UTC) FILETIME=[195A5560:01C56604] Cc: Subject: RE: novell through freebsd firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 17:13:59 -0000 Hi, Is there some way of determining the membership of SLP multicast groups on each physical interface of the FreeBSD? If you are using mrouted, then there is a debug level to check membership. Using that, you can verify if the first interface shows one of more members of the SLP multicast groups. If there are no members on the first interface, Freebsd multicast routing will not forward the replies to the first interface. If there are no members, then it could mean that the user agent on the NetWare client has not joined the SLP multicast groups and may need some configuration.=20 Another reason why it is not working could be due to multicast across NAT. I don't know how NAT works with multicast packets. Here multicast packets are sent towards the Novell servers. But on the reverse path, unicast responses with a local IP belonging to the Novell server come back which is the usual NAT. Perhaps NAT is not configured to allow these packets? A. -----Original Message----- From: vanyushenkov@yashz.ru [mailto:vanyushenkov@yashz.ru]=20 Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 3:32 AM To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: novell through freebsd firewall Hi all! =20 I'm sorry for my poor English. =20 I have Novell netware clients version 4.91 working over ip on windows 2000 boxes which connect to novell netware servers. Everything is good when clients and servers are on the same subnet. I want to separate clients from servers by FreeBSD firewall with 2 interfaces, one ifece is in one subnet, another iface is in another subnet and nat. =20 When client sends request to 239.255.255.253.svrloc udp And 224.0.1.22.svrloc udp It does not receive answer. =20 I tuned freebsd box to forward multicast packets, after that freebsd receives request on one iface, then after nat is Forwards in to second iface and sends multicast packet to servers. Servers send answers to second freebsd iface And do not forward them to first iface. =20 Could anyone can help me please =20 Vanyushenkov alexey Russia =20 _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 23:48:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from green.homeunix.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2406F16A41C; Tue, 31 May 2005 23:48:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org) Received: from green.homeunix.org (green@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.homeunix.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4VNmGok021529; Tue, 31 May 2005 19:48:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org) Received: (from green@localhost) by green.homeunix.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j4VNmG5V021528; Tue, 31 May 2005 19:48:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from green) Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 19:48:16 -0400 From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman To: Andrew Thompson Message-ID: <20050531234816.GA975@green.homeunix.org> References: <20050530232554.GA8674@heff.fud.org.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050530232554.GA8674@heff.fud.org.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: pf@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 23:48:17 -0000 On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:25:54AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote: > Hi, > > I am looking for testers and code review for if_bridge, the bridge > implementation from NetBSD (and OpenBSD). > > The patch and instructions can be found at: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/ > > Highlights include: > - 802.1d spanning tree support > - management of the bridge MAC table > - view bridged packets with bpf(4) > - good firewall support > > > I am especially interested in people who can test !i386, and users with > existing STP networks. I am looking forward to getting your feedback! As you know, I've been testing this on 5.4 in a transparent ipfw/ALTQ bridging/traffic-shaping-firewall setup. I ran into quite a few more issues with the driver's usage of locking while determining the proper configuration (which, btw, is to assign no layer 3 addresses to the internal or external interfaces, but assign them to the bridge interface). Some of these have since been fixed by you or I, but the most serious is the deadlock caused by not having consistency in data access between the input/output interfaces attached to the bridge and the bridge interface itself. It was quite simple to reproduce using IPFW dynamic rules and two fxp(4). The situation that occurs is the input path having locked the bridge, then the interface, and the output path locking the real interface and then trying to lock the bridge. It can be fixed by deferring the if_start(9), but having not run it with WITNESS I'm not certain that is the only big problem. Ideally, there should be a global bridge-list shared/exclusive lock and per-bridge shared/exclusive locks. This will require a fair bit of code churn... but the current state is largely not productionable on FreeBSD thanks to a locking versus IPL model being used in the kernel versus the if_bridge(4) code having been structured for IPL. I very much like this far more featureful and cleaner bridging implementation; it would benefit from implementing a locking strategy almost entirely not unlike Netgraph. -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\ From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 23:51:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0FE16A41C for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 23:51:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from harlot@sportinginsurance.com) Received: from netclub.lisgroup.net (netclub.lisgroup.net [195.248.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CA0A43D4C for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 23:51:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from harlot@sportinginsurance.com) Received: from [47.114.47.52] (port=4203 helo=[arithmetics]) by netclub.lisgroup.net with esmtp id 2408446297obviate27864 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 02:51:09 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v728) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <656504889.5454196804@netclub.lisgroup.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Josephine Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 02:51:08 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.728) Subject: Identical to the brandname drugs, low prices, international shipping. X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 23:51:11 -0000 Top 10 meds bought online http://dangling.healup.info/?penetratesxtvuysuperlativeszvpcheated Don't let the bastards grind you down. Life is anything that dies when you stomp on it. INEXPEDIENT, adj. Not calculated to advance one's interests. A paranoid is someone who knows a little of what's going on. From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 23:58:51 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7093716A41C; Tue, 31 May 2005 23:58:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thompsa@fud.org.nz) Received: from heff.fud.org.nz (60-234-149-201.bitstream.orcon.net.nz [60.234.149.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E173E43D1D; Tue, 31 May 2005 23:58:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thompsa@fud.org.nz) Received: from thompsa by heff.fud.org.nz with local (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1DdGdF-0003VG-MF; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:58:49 +1200 Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:58:49 +1200 From: Andrew Thompson To: Brian Fundakowski Feldman Message-ID: <20050531235849.GA13258@heff.fud.org.nz> References: <20050530232554.GA8674@heff.fud.org.nz> <20050531234816.GA975@green.homeunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050531234816.GA975@green.homeunix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: Andrew Thompson Cc: pf@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 23:58:51 -0000 On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 07:48:16PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:25:54AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am looking for testers and code review for if_bridge, the bridge > > implementation from NetBSD (and OpenBSD). > > > > The patch and instructions can be found at: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/ > > > > Some of these have since been fixed by you or I, but the most serious > is the deadlock caused by not having consistency in data access > between the input/output interfaces attached to the bridge and the > bridge interface itself. It was quite simple to reproduce using IPFW > dynamic rules and two fxp(4). The situation that occurs is the input > path having locked the bridge, then the interface, and the output path > locking the real interface and then trying to lock the bridge. It > can be fixed by deferring the if_start(9), but having not run it with > WITNESS I'm not certain that is the only big problem. > > Ideally, there should be a global bridge-list shared/exclusive lock > and per-bridge shared/exclusive locks. This will require a fair bit > of code churn... but the current state is largely not productionable > on FreeBSD thanks to a locking versus IPL model being used in the > kernel versus the if_bridge(4) code having been structured for IPL. > Have you looked at the patch above, I have been using bridge-list and per-bridge locks for about a week now. There have been a couple of changes from the original patch you have, are you able to re-test? cheers, Andrew From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 00:18:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from green.homeunix.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35FD216A41C; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 00:18:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org) Received: from green.homeunix.org (green@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.homeunix.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j510IXTg021703; Tue, 31 May 2005 20:18:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from green@green.homeunix.org) Received: (from green@localhost) by green.homeunix.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j510IXp5021702; Tue, 31 May 2005 20:18:33 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from green) Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 20:18:33 -0400 From: Brian Fundakowski Feldman To: Andrew Thompson Message-ID: <20050601001833.GB975@green.homeunix.org> References: <20050530232554.GA8674@heff.fud.org.nz> <20050531234816.GA975@green.homeunix.org> <20050531235849.GA13258@heff.fud.org.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050531235849.GA13258@heff.fud.org.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: pf@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 00:18:34 -0000 On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 11:58:49AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 07:48:16PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:25:54AM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I am looking for testers and code review for if_bridge, the bridge > > > implementation from NetBSD (and OpenBSD). > > > > > > The patch and instructions can be found at: > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/ > > > > > > > Some of these have since been fixed by you or I, but the most serious > > is the deadlock caused by not having consistency in data access > > between the input/output interfaces attached to the bridge and the > > bridge interface itself. It was quite simple to reproduce using IPFW > > dynamic rules and two fxp(4). The situation that occurs is the input > > path having locked the bridge, then the interface, and the output path > > locking the real interface and then trying to lock the bridge. It > > can be fixed by deferring the if_start(9), but having not run it with > > WITNESS I'm not certain that is the only big problem. > > > > Ideally, there should be a global bridge-list shared/exclusive lock > > and per-bridge shared/exclusive locks. This will require a fair bit > > of code churn... but the current state is largely not productionable > > on FreeBSD thanks to a locking versus IPL model being used in the > > kernel versus the if_bridge(4) code having been structured for IPL. > > > > Have you looked at the patch above, I have been using bridge-list and > per-bridge locks for about a week now. There have been a couple of > changes from the original patch you have, are you able to re-test? I only skimmed it enough to see you had fixed one of the issues (bridge_rtable_fini() asserting a lock it did not own) but not the issue where you simply cannot call or be called from both directions with regard to a bridged interface. Unfortunately, I don't think there's a 100% reliable way to defer if_start() calls :-/ -- Brian Fundakowski Feldman \'[ FreeBSD ]''''''''''\ <> green@FreeBSD.org \ The Power to Serve! \ Opinions expressed are my own. \,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,\ From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 01:59:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3638116A41C; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 01:59:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iampinetan@netscape.net) Received: from imo-d01.mx.aol.com (imo-d01.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FAC43D1D; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 01:59:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iampinetan@netscape.net) Received: from iampinetan@netscape.net by imo-d01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r1.7.) id n.13a.100c9dff (16240); Tue, 31 May 2005 21:59:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from netscape.net (mow-d21.webmail.aol.com [205.188.139.162]) by air-in03.mx.aol.com (v106.2) with ESMTP id MAILININ34-3f70429d167614e; Tue, 31 May 2005 21:59:18 -0400 Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 21:59:18 -0400 From: iampinetan@netscape.net To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <59C9FB8D.4CC432F3.0F1E5A0A@netscape.net> X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 X-AOL-IP: 61.187.16.2 X-AOL-Language: english Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: OpenKeta@FreeBSD released! X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 01:59:22 -0000 We have designed and implemented a novel kernel web accelerator, named as OpenKeta@FreeBSD, and released v0.8-alpha at openketa.sourceforge.net. It has similar function as TUX at Redhat. OpenKeta@FreeBSD has software pipeline architecture. It devides HTTP request process operation into several pipeline stages and uses defferent thread to do specified operation stage. It adapts to SMP platform. With one SMP server and 5 testing clients OpenKeta@FreeBSD can get better SPECweb99 performance than TUX. Currently OpenKeta@FreeBSD v0.80-alpha just implemented basic HTTP/1.1 protocol. We hope some volunteers can join us and get better OpenKeta. Enjoy OpenKeta@FreeBSD. Pine Tan __________________________________________________________________ Switch to Netscape Internet Service. As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register Netscape. Just the Net You Need. New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups. Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 03:21:07 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F5E916A41C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 03:21:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from junlu_nudt@yahoo.com.cn) Received: from web15502.mail.cnb.yahoo.com (web15502.mail.cnb.yahoo.com [202.165.102.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5957043D1D for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 03:21:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from junlu_nudt@yahoo.com.cn) Received: (qmail 65890 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Jun 2005 03:21:04 -0000 Message-ID: <20050601032104.65888.qmail@web15502.mail.cnb.yahoo.com> Received: from [61.187.16.2] by web15502.mail.cnb.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:21:04 CST Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:21:04 +0800 (CST) From: jun lu To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: some question about mbuf reuse X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 03:21:07 -0000 our project write a web server in freebsd kernel. we can receive and send data directly in kernel.Now i have some idea, i think i can creat a mbuf with cluster buffer before i send some data,because the data i want to send are all in kernel,so i can take thest data in cluster i create before,and transfer this mbuf to sosend(),then i make tcp/ip cann't release this mbuf after it received the ack.In this way, i can send data in kernel next time use the same mbuf with different cluster.i am not sure whether this way can enhance the performance.So,i hope some one can discuss with me --------------------------------- DO YOU YAHOO!? »¶Ó­Ê¹ÓÃÑÅ»¢³¬´óÈÝÁ¿Ãâ·ÑÓÊÏä From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 06:18:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A906116A41C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 06:18:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de) Received: from antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de (antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de [134.102.176.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47EC443D1D for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 06:18:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de) Received: from bremerhaven.ant.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.176.10]) by antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1DdMYq-0006IA-8x for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 08:18:40 +0200 Message-ID: <429D5364.5010304@ant.uni-bremen.de> Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 08:19:16 +0200 From: Heinrich Rebehn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050513 Debian/1.7.8-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi list, I got several of the above errors in my /var/log/messages. Can someone tell me what this means? -- Heinrich Rebehn [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Subject: nfsd send error -1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 06:18:53 -0000 Hi list, I got several of the above errors in my /var/log/messages. Can someone tell me what this means? -- Heinrich Rebehn University of Bremen Physics / Electrical and Electronics Engineering - Department of Telecommunications - Phone : +49/421/218-4664 Fax : -3341 From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 07:14:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD4C16A41C; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:14:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iampinetan@netscape.net) Received: from imo-d02.mx.aol.com (imo-d02.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19AA43D1D; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:14:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iampinetan@netscape.net) Received: from iampinetan@netscape.net by imo-d02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r1.7.) id n.1b1.e338385 (22683); Wed, 1 Jun 2005 03:14:13 -0400 (EDT) Received: from netscape.net (mow-d16.webmail.aol.com [205.188.139.132]) by air-in04.mx.aol.com (v106.2) with ESMTP id MAILININ44-589b429d60452fd; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 03:14:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 03:14:13 -0400 From: iampinetan@netscape.net To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <416BAF1E.6B1460E7.0F1E5A0A@netscape.net> X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 X-AOL-IP: 61.187.16.2 X-AOL-Language: english Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: The performances of OpenKeta@FreeBSD v0.8-alpha X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 07:14:17 -0000 We use one server and several PCs to test OpenKETA@FreeBSD's performances. The server has two Xeon 2.4GHz CPUs (disabled the hyperthread function), 2 GB DDR2 memory, one 37 GB 10000 rpm SCSI hard disk and a Gigabit Ethernet network adaptor. Client PCs have a Pentium 4 2.0 GHz CPU, 512 DDR memory, one 40 GB 5400 rpm hard disk and an integrated 100 Mb Ethernet network adaptor. Testing tools are SPECweb99 and Benchmark Factory. We use SPECweb99 to experiment 300, 600 and 1000 simultaneous connections on four testing platforms including the OpenKETA@FreeBSD on FreeBSD v5.3, Apache v1.3.3 on FreeBSD v5.3, Apache v1.3.3 on Redhat Enterprise Linux v3.0, and TUX 3.2.14 on Redhat Enterprise Linux v3.0. All these environments setup and configure by default and without any optimization. Since OpenKETA just accelerates the static HTTP requests, we have set the dynamic request ratio to 0.0 in SPECweb99’s rc file. NOTE that: The experiments tests all are just on the default OSs Settting and without any optimizations. Table 1 experiment results of 300 simultaneous connections (2 clients) Mean Resp. Time (ms)/ Weighted Bandwidth (bps)/ Valid+Invalid connections/ Confirming Connections/ Throughput ops/sec/ Apache(FreeBSD) 410.0 303272.69 300+0 50 761 OpenKETA@FreeBSD 301.2 395701.82 300+0 300 963 Apache(RHEL) 382.2 313600.49 300+0 56 765 Tux(RHEL) 320.4 373585.24 300+0 300 907 Table 2 experiment results of 600 simultaneous connections (3 clients) Mean Resp. Time (ms)/ Weighted Bandwidth (bps)/ Valid+Invalid connections/ Confirming Connections/ Throughput ops/sec/ Apache(FreeBSD) 719.3 166083.41 600+0 0 771 OpenKETA@FreeBSD 340.4 360495.45 600+0 600 1752 Apache(RHEL) 758.2 157416.85 600+0 0 769 Tux(RHEL) 456.1 261535.11 600+0 0 1296 Table 3 experiment results of 1000 simultaneous connections (5 clients) Mean Resp. Time (ms)/ Weighted Bandwidth (bps)/ Valid+Invalid connections/ Confirming Connections/ Throughput ops/sec Apache(FreeBSD) 1077.7 110974.79 983+17 0 773 OpenKETA@FreeBSD 418.6 295451.23 1000+0 36 2362 Apache(RHEL) 1247.2 95514.28 989+11 0 750 Tux(RHEL) 791.1 150558.99 999+1 0 1244 __________________________________________________________________ Switch to Netscape Internet Service. As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register Netscape. Just the Net You Need. New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups. Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 07:23:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A23016A41C; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:23:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Received: from Neo-Vortex.net (203-173-58-65.dyn.iinet.net.au [203.173.58.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF0EB43D48; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:23:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Received: from localhost.Neo-Vortex.net (Neo-Vortex@localhost.Neo-Vortex.net [127.0.0.1]) by Neo-Vortex.net (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j517N10B052999; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:23:01 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:23:01 +1000 (EST) From: Neo-Vortex To: iampinetan@netscape.net In-Reply-To: <416BAF1E.6B1460E7.0F1E5A0A@netscape.net> Message-ID: <20050601171953.Y51985@Neo-Vortex.net> References: <416BAF1E.6B1460E7.0F1E5A0A@netscape.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The performances of OpenKeta@FreeBSD v0.8-alpha X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 07:23:04 -0000 On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 iampinetan@netscape.net wrote: > Mean Resp. Time (ms)/ Weighted Bandwidth (bps)/ Valid+Invalid connections/ Confirming Connections/ Throughput ops/sec > Apache(FreeBSD) 410.0 303272.69 300+0 50 761 > Apache(RHEL) 382.2 313600.49 300+0 56 765 > Apache(FreeBSD) 719.3 166083.41 600+0 0 771 > Apache(RHEL) 758.2 157416.85 600+0 0 769 > Apache(FreeBSD) 1077.7 110974.79 983+17 0 773 > Apache(RHEL) 1247.2 95514.28 989+11 0 750 Anyone care to explain why on FreeBSD (without OpenKeta) the preformance was lower than Linux for the 300 connection test although better for the 600 and 1000? (Just Curiosity) ~Neo-Vortex From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 07:24:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA60C16A41C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:24:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Received: from Neo-Vortex.net (203-173-58-65.dyn.iinet.net.au [203.173.58.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CA2343D55 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:23:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Received: from localhost.Neo-Vortex.net (Neo-Vortex@localhost.Neo-Vortex.net [127.0.0.1]) by Neo-Vortex.net (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j517NnxI053141; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:23:49 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:23:49 +1000 (EST) From: Neo-Vortex To: Heinrich Rebehn In-Reply-To: <429D5364.5010304@ant.uni-bremen.de> Message-ID: <20050601172312.H53066@Neo-Vortex.net> References: <429D5364.5010304@ant.uni-bremen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfsd send error -1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 07:24:01 -0000 On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: > Hi list, > > I got several of the above errors in my /var/log/messages. Can someone > tell me what this means? I don't see any errors... forgot to put them in? ~Neo-Vortex From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 07:41:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296BF16A41C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:41:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: from relay.pair.com (relay00.pair.com [209.68.1.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1AF043D1F for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:41:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 33767 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2005 07:41:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 1 Jun 2005 07:41:51 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 02:41:40 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack To: iampinetan@netscape.net In-Reply-To: <416BAF1E.6B1460E7.0F1E5A0A@netscape.net> Message-ID: <20050601023829.S31985@odysseus.silby.com> References: <416BAF1E.6B1460E7.0F1E5A0A@netscape.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The performances of OpenKeta@FreeBSD v0.8-alpha X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 07:41:53 -0000 On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 iampinetan@netscape.net wrote: > We use SPECweb99 to experiment 300, 600 and 1000 simultaneous > connections on four testing platforms including the OpenKETA@FreeBSD on > FreeBSD v5.3, Apache v1.3.3 on FreeBSD v5.3, Apache v1.3.3 on Redhat > Enterprise Linux v3.0, and TUX 3.2.14 on Redhat Enterprise Linux v3.0. The results look interesting, but I think you need more datapoints. Apache 1.3 is one of the worst servers in existance for static content serving; if possible, you should include apache 2.x and thttpd in your benchmarks for comparison purposes. Also, does openketa have a website describing what exactly it does? Is this a piece of software that will be released soon? Thanks, Mike "Silby" Silbersack From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 07:44:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520EE16A41C; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:44:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [204.156.12.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB5D43D1F; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:44:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442F746B7B; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 03:44:21 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 08:45:03 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: iampinetan@netscape.net In-Reply-To: <59C9FB8D.4CC432F3.0F1E5A0A@netscape.net> Message-ID: <20050601081927.Q24311@fledge.watson.org> References: <59C9FB8D.4CC432F3.0F1E5A0A@netscape.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenKeta@FreeBSD released! X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 07:44:22 -0000 On Tue, 31 May 2005 iampinetan@netscape.net wrote: > We have designed and implemented a novel kernel web accelerator, named > as OpenKeta@FreeBSD, and released v0.8-alpha at > openketa.sourceforge.net. It has similar function as TUX at Redhat. > > OpenKeta@FreeBSD has software pipeline architecture. It devides HTTP > request process operation into several pipeline stages and uses > defferent thread to do specified operation stage. It adapts to SMP > platform. With one SMP server and 5 testing clients OpenKeta@FreeBSD can > get better SPECweb99 performance than TUX. > > Currently OpenKeta@FreeBSD v0.80-alpha just implemented basic HTTP/1.1 > protocol. We hope some volunteers can join us and get better OpenKeta. Pine, This sounds really neat! Are you currently using the FreeBSD 5.x or 6.x kernel? It sounds like you're in a position to benchmark performance improvements, especially on SMP -- are you interested in doing benchmarking with network performance patches? :-) Robert N M Watson From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 07:44:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74AC16A41C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:44:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mathias@TeleCity.com) Received: from mail117.messagelabs.com (mail117.messagelabs.com [195.245.231.211]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0652143D58 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:44:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mathias@TeleCity.com) X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: Mathias@TeleCity.com X-Msg-Ref: server-10.tower-117.messagelabs.com!1117611879!6209551!1 X-StarScan-Version: 5.4.15; banners=telecity.com,-,- X-Originating-IP: [217.20.38.102] Received: (qmail 20105 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2005 07:44:39 -0000 Received: from lon3.telecity.net (HELO LON3.tcy.prv) (217.20.38.102) by server-10.tower-117.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 1 Jun 2005 07:44:39 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 08:44:38 +0100 Message-ID: <7DA012A4E4DA934FA17318A11F7547F5A6BE31@LON3.tcy.prv> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: rfc2385 support Thread-Index: AcVkRJP7c7MY/m4dRBuu+6QIY/iHlACOMOgg From: To: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: RE: rfc2385 support X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 07:44:43 -0000 Thanks=20for=20the=20info.=20I'm=20currently=20rebuilding=20the=20kernel=20= on=20FreeBSD5.4 with=20FAST_IPSEC=20and=20TCP_SIGNATURE=20added=20to=20options=20and=20cry= pto=20added=20to device.=20Will=20post=20the=20result. =20 Regards,=20 ________________________________ From:=20Lee=20Johnston=20[mailto:lee@wildcard.net.uk]=20 Sent:=20Sunday,=20May=2029,=202005=2012:50=20PM To:=20Mathias=20Kenfack-Tabakem=20(LON);=20freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject:=20Re:=20rfc2385=20support Hi=20Mathias, I've=20managed=20to=20get=20Quagga=20+=20FreeBSD=204.x/5.x=20to=20establis= h=20BGP=20sessions with=20Cisco=20routers=20with=20MD5=20password=20authentication. You'll=20need=20to=20ensure=20you=20build=20Quagga=20with=20MD5=20support=20= (the=20current port=20gives=20you=20the=20option=20during=20build),=20compile=20your=20ke= rnel=20with relevant=20TCP_SIGNATURE=20and=20crypto=20support=20(options=20vary=20depe= nding=20on=20if your=20using=204.x/5.x),=20use=20setkey,=20and=20add=20the=20usual=20neigh= bor=20x.x.x.x password=20yyyy=20to=20Quagga. Let=20me=20know=20if=20you=20need=20any=20more=20info/help.. Regards, Lee. At=2011:20=2029/05/2005,=20Mathias@TeleCity.com=20wrote: =09Hi=20guys, =09 =09I'm=20trying=20to=20find=20out=20if=20any=20release=20of=20FreeBSD=20su= pports=20MD5=20as per =09rfc2385.=20I=20will=20be=20using=20it=20with=20quagga=20on=20BGP=20sess= ion authentication. =09 =09Regards =09Mathias, =09 =09 =09 ______________________________________________________________________ =09DISCLAIMER =09This=20e-mail=20is=20intended=20only=20for=20the=20use=20of=20the=20add= ressees=20named above=20and=20may=20be=20confidential.=20If=20you=20are=20not=20an=20addre= ssee=20you=20must=20not use=20any=20information=20contained=20in=20nor=20copy=20it=20nor=20inform=20= any=20person=20other than=20TeleCity=20or=20the=20addressees=20of=20its=20existence=20or=20cont= ents.=20If=20you have=20received=20this=20e-mail=20in=20error,=20please=20contact=20the=20T= eleCity=20IT department=20on=20+44=20(0)=20161=20232=203220=20or=20by=20email=20at techsupport@telecity.com.=20Internet=20communications=20cannot=20be=20guar= anteed 100%=20secure,=20you=20should=20therefore=20take=20this=20potential=20lack= =20of=20security into=20consideration=20when=20emailing=20us=20as=20we=20do=20not=20accept=20= legal responsibility=20for=20the=20security=20of=20the=20contents=20of=20this=20= or=20other=20emails. Whilst=20TeleCity=20take=20measures=20to=20prevent=20any=20virus=20contami= nation=20of=20our computer=20systems,=20recipients=20of=20emails=20should=20always=20ensure=20= that=20they take=20their=20own=20precautions=20to=20avoid=20virus=20contamination. =09 ______________________________________________________________________ =09_______________________________________________ =09freebsd-net@freebsd.org=20mailing=20list =09http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net =09To=20unsubscribe,=20send=20any=20mail=20to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Lee=20@=20Wildcard=20Internet t:=20(0845)=20165=201510 f:=20(0845)=20165=201511 m:=20(07795)=20423=20617 e:=20lee@wildcard.net.uk Web=20Development=20-=20Domains=20-=20Hosting=20-=20Co-location=20-=20Dedi= cated=20Servers=20 ______________________________________________________________________ This=20footer=20denotes=20the=20email=20has=20been=20inbound=20scanned=20f= or=20Virus. ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ DISCLAIMER This=20e-mail=20is=20intended=20only=20for=20the=20use=20of=20the=20addres= sees=20named=20above=20and=20may=20be=20confidential.=20If=20you=20are=20n= ot=20an=20addressee=20you=20must=20not=20use=20any=20information=20contain= ed=20in=20nor=20copy=20it=20nor=20inform=20any=20person=20other=20than=20T= eleCity=20or=20the=20addressees=20of=20its=20existence=20or=20contents.=20= If=20you=20have=20received=20this=20e-mail=20in=20error,=20please=20contac= t=20the=20TeleCity=20IT=20department=20on=20+44=20(0)=20161=20232=203220=20= or=20by=20email=20at=20techsupport@telecity.com.=20Internet=20communicatio= ns=20cannot=20be=20guaranteed=20100%=20secure,=20you=20should=20therefore=20= take=20this=20potential=20lack=20of=20security=20into=20consideration=20wh= en=20emailing=20us=20as=20we=20do=20not=20accept=20legal=20responsibility=20= for=20the=20security=20of=20the=20contents=20of=20this=20or=20other=20emai= ls.=20Whilst=20TeleCity=20take=20measures=20to=20prevent=20any=20virus=20c= ontamination=20of=20our=20computer=20systems,=20recipients=20of=20emails=20= should=20always=20ensure=20that=20they=20take=20their=20own=20precautions=20= to=20avoid=20virus=20contamination. ______________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 07:46:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9A216A41C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:46:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@haakonia.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-2.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E6B43D1F for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 07:46:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@haakonia.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de) Received: from r220-1 (r220-1.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.31]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IHE006QCAXD47@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:46:26 +0200 (MEST) Received: from relay.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.3.1]) by r220-1 (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:46:24 +0200 (MEST) Received: from haakonia.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de (haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.181.92]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.3/8.13.3/1) with ESMTP id j517kJA6001527; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:46:19 +0200 (MEST) Received: by haakonia.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id ECB2E28439; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:46:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:46:18 +0200 From: Christian Brueffer In-reply-to: <20050601023829.S31985@odysseus.silby.com> To: Mike Silbersack Message-id: <20050601074618.GB1053@unixpages.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary=l76fUT7nc3MelDdI; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-PGP-Key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D References: <416BAF1E.6B1460E7.0F1E5A0A@netscape.net> <20050601023829.S31985@odysseus.silby.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, iampinetan@netscape.net Subject: Re: The performances of OpenKeta@FreeBSD v0.8-alpha X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 07:46:27 -0000 --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:41:40AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: >=20 >=20 > On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 iampinetan@netscape.net wrote: >=20 > >We use SPECweb99 to experiment 300, 600 and 1000 simultaneous=20 > >connections on four testing platforms including the OpenKETA@FreeBSD on= =20 > >FreeBSD v5.3, Apache v1.3.3 on FreeBSD v5.3, Apache v1.3.3 on Redhat=20 > >Enterprise Linux v3.0, and TUX 3.2.14 on Redhat Enterprise Linux v3.0. >=20 > The results look interesting, but I think you need more datapoints.=20 > Apache 1.3 is one of the worst servers in existance for static content=20 > serving; if possible, you should include apache 2.x and thttpd in your=20 > benchmarks for comparison purposes. >=20 > Also, does openketa have a website describing what exactly it does? Is= =20 > this a piece of software that will be released soon? >=20 =46rom an earlier mail: http://openketa.sourceforge.net - Christian --=20 Christian Brueffer chris@unixpages.org brueffer@FreeBSD.org GPG Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCnWfKbHYXjKDtmC0RAlewAJ0Shye0WI2jeW4sMN1pKjj6ntJ/qwCgqQIm UW1HJEPTydk/TKx3JeuFR4A= =IVSk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI-- From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 08:01:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A41716A41C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 08:01:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de) Received: from antsrv1.ant.uni-bremen.de (antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de [134.102.176.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14E643D4C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 08:01:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de) Received: from bremerhaven.ant.uni-bremen.de ([134.102.176.10]) by antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de with esmtp (Exim 4.42) id 1DdO9j-0006aN-58; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 10:00:51 +0200 Message-ID: <429D6B57.2090701@ant.uni-bremen.de> Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 10:01:27 +0200 From: Heinrich Rebehn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050513 Debian/1.7.8-1 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neo-Vortex References: <429D5364.5010304@ant.uni-bremen.de> <20050601172312.H53066@Neo-Vortex.net> In-Reply-To: <20050601172312.H53066@Neo-Vortex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "antsrv2.ant.uni-bremen.de", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Neo-Vortex wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: > > >>Hi list, >> >>I got several of the above errors in my /var/log/messages. Can someone >>tell me what this means? > > > I don't see any errors... forgot to put them in? > > ~Neo-Vortex [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfsd send error -1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 08:01:04 -0000 Neo-Vortex wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: > > >>Hi list, >> >>I got several of the above errors in my /var/log/messages. Can someone >>tell me what this means? > > > I don't see any errors... forgot to put them in? > > ~Neo-Vortex Sorry, i put it into the subject line: nfsd send error -1 --Heinrich From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 08:26:04 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FCC16A41C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 08:26:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vanyushenkov@yashz.ru) Received: from gw.yashz.ru (gw.yashz.yaroslavl.ru [80.92.2.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6EF943D1D for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 08:26:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vanyushenkov@yashz.ru) Received: (qmail 10923 invoked by uid 0); 1 Jun 2005 08:25:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dinadm) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Jun 2005 08:25:35 -0000 From: "?????????? ???????" To: "'Biswas, Anumita'" , Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 12:24:16 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 In-Reply-To: <637A278D8D0DBC438EA5E75C6E1818B902E619F3@magenta.hq.netapp.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4942.400 Thread-Index: AcVly+kRcVQ+Ks1PQ1uwY/9FwqDZHwAMpBtgACEQ5CA= X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 2.0.0 [0125], KAS/Release X-Spamtest-Info: No License Message-Id: <20050601082600.B6EF943D1D@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: Subject: RE: novell through freebsd firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 08:26:04 -0000 Thanks for your reply. I use pf from OpenBSD and nat does not allow unicast responses. Is it possible to run nat and multicast on FreeBSD successfully? Vanyushenkov Alexey Russia -----Original Message----- From: Biswas, Anumita [mailto:Anumita.Biswas@netapp.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 9:14 PM To: ?????????? ???????; freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: novell through freebsd firewall Hi, Is there some way of determining the membership of SLP multicast groups on each physical interface of the FreeBSD? If you are using mrouted, then there is a debug level to check membership. Using that, you can verify if the first interface shows one of more members of the SLP multicast groups. If there are no members on the first interface, Freebsd multicast routing will not forward the replies to the first interface. If there are no members, then it could mean that the user agent on the NetWare client has not joined the SLP multicast groups and may need some configuration. Another reason why it is not working could be due to multicast across NAT. I don't know how NAT works with multicast packets. Here multicast packets are sent towards the Novell servers. But on the reverse path, unicast responses with a local IP belonging to the Novell server come back which is the usual NAT. Perhaps NAT is not configured to allow these packets? A. -----Original Message----- From: vanyushenkov@yashz.ru [mailto:vanyushenkov@yashz.ru] Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2005 3:32 AM To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: novell through freebsd firewall Hi all! I'm sorry for my poor English. I have Novell netware clients version 4.91 working over ip on windows 2000 boxes which connect to novell netware servers. Everything is good when clients and servers are on the same subnet. I want to separate clients from servers by FreeBSD firewall with 2 interfaces, one ifece is in one subnet, another iface is in another subnet and nat. When client sends request to 239.255.255.253.svrloc udp And 224.0.1.22.svrloc udp It does not receive answer. I tuned freebsd box to forward multicast packets, after that freebsd receives request on one iface, then after nat is Forwards in to second iface and sends multicast packet to servers. Servers send answers to second freebsd iface And do not forward them to first iface. Could anyone can help me please Vanyushenkov alexey Russia _______________________________________________ freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 13:59:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500E216A41C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:59:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mathias@TeleCity.com) Received: from mail114.messagelabs.com (mail114.messagelabs.com [195.245.231.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5182243D49 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:59:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mathias@TeleCity.com) X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: Mathias@TeleCity.com X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-114.messagelabs.com!1117634347!8735994!1 X-StarScan-Version: 5.4.15; banners=telecity.com,-,- X-Originating-IP: [217.20.38.102] Received: (qmail 5283 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2005 13:59:07 -0000 Received: from lon3.telecity.net (HELO LON3.tcy.prv) (217.20.38.102) by server-11.tower-114.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 1 Jun 2005 13:59:07 -0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 14:59:07 +0100 Message-ID: <7DA012A4E4DA934FA17318A11F7547F5A6BEC8@LON3.tcy.prv> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: rfc2385 support Thread-Index: AcVkRJP7c7MY/m4dRBuu+6QIY/iHlACbAq+A From: To: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: RE: rfc2385 support X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 13:59:11 -0000 Hi=20Lee,=20 =20 Running=20on=20FreeBSD=205.4=20with=20latest=20ports=20collection. =20 How=20can=20i=20remove=20some=20compile=20options?=20The=20error=20is=20on= =20OSPF=20btu=20I=20don't need=20it.=20BGP=20is=20not=20reporting=20any=20errors. I=20am=20getting=20the=20following=20errors: =20 root@rs1#=20make=20install=20clean =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D =20 You=20can=20build=20quagga=20with=20the=20following=20options: =20 WITH_SNMP_4=20=20=20=20=20=20=20Force=20net-snmp=204.x=20to=20be=20used ENABLE_USER=20=20=20=20=20=20=20Specify=20user=20to=20run=20Quagga=20suite= =20as ENABLE_GROUP=20=20=20=20=20=20Specify=20group=20to=20run=20Quagga=20suite=20= as ENABLE_VTY_GROUP=20=20Specify=20group=20for=20vty=20socket=20ownership SYSCONF_DIR=20=20=20=20=20=20=20Specify=20directory=20for=20Quagga=20confi= guration=20files LOCALSTATE_DIR=20=20=20=20Specify=20directory=20for=20Quagga=20runtime=20f= iles =20 The=20following=20options=20may=20be=20configured=20interactively: =20=20=20WITH_PAM=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20PAM=20authentic= ation=20for=20vtysh =20=20=20WITH_OSPF_NSSA=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20NSSA=20support=20(RFC1587) =20=20=20WITH_OSPF_OPAQUE_LSA=20=20OSPF=20Opaque-LSA=20with=20OSPFAPI=20su= pport=20(RFC2370) =20=20=20WITH_RTADV=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20IPv6=20Router=20Adv= ertisements =20=20=20WITH_SNMP=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20SNMP=20support =20=20=20WITH_TCPSOCKETS=20=20=20=20=20=20=20Use=20TCP/IP=20sockets=20for=20= protocol=20daemons =20=20=20WITH_TCPMD5=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20Use=20experimental=20= MD5=20patch=20for=20BGP =3D=3D=3D>=20=20Vulnerability=20check=20disabled,=20database=20not=20found= =3D=3D=3D>=20=20Found=20saved=20configuration=20for=20quagga-0.98.3_2 =3D=3D=3D>=20=20Extracting=20for=20quagga-0.98.3_2 =3D>=20Checksum=20OK=20for=20quagga-0.98.3.tar.gz. =3D=3D=3D>=20=20=20quagga-0.98.3_2=20depends=20on=20file:=20/usr/local/bin= /perl5.8.6=20-=20found =3D=3D=3D>=20=20Patching=20for=20quagga-0.98.3_2 =3D=3D=3D>=20=20=20quagga-0.98.3_2=20depends=20on=20file:=20/usr/local/bin= /perl5.8.6=20-=20found =3D=3D=3D>=20=20Applying=20extra=20patch /usr/ports/net/quagga/files/extra-tcpmd5-patch-bgpd::bgp_network.c =3D=3D=3D>=20=20Applying=20extra=20patch /usr/ports/net/quagga/files/extra-tcpmd5-patch-bgpd::bgp_vty.c =3D=3D=3D>=20=20Applying=20extra=20patch /usr/ports/net/quagga/files/extra-tcpmd5-patch-bgpd::bgpd.c =3D=3D=3D>=20=20Applying=20extra=20patch /usr/ports/net/quagga/files/extra-tcpmd5-patch-bgpd::bgpd.h =3D=3D=3D>=20=20Applying=20extra=20patch /usr/ports/net/quagga/files/extra-tcpmd5-patch-configure.ac =3D=3D=3D>=20=20Applying=20extra=20patch /usr/ports/net/quagga/files/extra-tcpmd5-patch-lib::sockopt.c =3D=3D=3D>=20=20Applying=20extra=20patch /usr/ports/net/quagga/files/extra-tcpmd5-patch-lib::sockopt.h =3D=3D=3D>=20=20Applying=20FreeBSD=20patches=20for=20quagga-0.98.3_2 1=20out=20of=202=20hunks=20failed--saving=20rejects=20to=20ospfd/ospf_lsa.= c.rej =3D>=20Patch=20patch-ospfd::ospf_lsa.c=20failed=20to=20apply=20cleanly. =3D>=20Patch(es)=20patch-configure.ac=20applied=20cleanly. ***=20Error=20code=201 =20 Stop=20in=20/usr/ports/net/quagga. ________________________________ From:=20Lee=20Johnston=20[mailto:lee@wildcard.net.uk]=20 Sent:=20Sunday,=20May=2029,=202005=2012:50=20PM To:=20Mathias=20Kenfack-Tabakem=20(LON);=20freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject:=20Re:=20rfc2385=20support Hi=20Mathias, I've=20managed=20to=20get=20Quagga=20+=20FreeBSD=204.x/5.x=20to=20establis= h=20BGP=20sessions with=20Cisco=20routers=20with=20MD5=20password=20authentication. You'll=20need=20to=20ensure=20you=20build=20Quagga=20with=20MD5=20support=20= (the=20current port=20gives=20you=20the=20option=20during=20build),=20compile=20your=20ke= rnel=20with relevant=20TCP_SIGNATURE=20and=20crypto=20support=20(options=20vary=20depe= nding=20on=20if your=20using=204.x/5.x),=20use=20setkey,=20and=20add=20the=20usual=20neigh= bor=20x.x.x.x password=20yyyy=20to=20Quagga. Let=20me=20know=20if=20you=20need=20any=20more=20info/help.. Regards, Lee. At=2011:20=2029/05/2005,=20Mathias@TeleCity.com=20wrote: =09Hi=20guys, =09 =09I'm=20trying=20to=20find=20out=20if=20any=20release=20of=20FreeBSD=20su= pports=20MD5=20as per =09rfc2385.=20I=20will=20be=20using=20it=20with=20quagga=20on=20BGP=20sess= ion authentication. =09 =09Regards =09Mathias, =09 =09 =09 ______________________________________________________________________ =09DISCLAIMER =09This=20e-mail=20is=20intended=20only=20for=20the=20use=20of=20the=20add= ressees=20named above=20and=20may=20be=20confidential.=20If=20you=20are=20not=20an=20addre= ssee=20you=20must=20not use=20any=20information=20contained=20in=20nor=20copy=20it=20nor=20inform=20= any=20person=20other than=20TeleCity=20or=20the=20addressees=20of=20its=20existence=20or=20cont= ents.=20If=20you have=20received=20this=20e-mail=20in=20error,=20please=20contact=20the=20T= eleCity=20IT department=20on=20+44=20(0)=20161=20232=203220=20or=20by=20email=20at techsupport@telecity.com.=20Internet=20communications=20cannot=20be=20guar= anteed 100%=20secure,=20you=20should=20therefore=20take=20this=20potential=20lack= =20of=20security into=20consideration=20when=20emailing=20us=20as=20we=20do=20not=20accept=20= legal responsibility=20for=20the=20security=20of=20the=20contents=20of=20this=20= or=20other=20emails. Whilst=20TeleCity=20take=20measures=20to=20prevent=20any=20virus=20contami= nation=20of=20our computer=20systems,=20recipients=20of=20emails=20should=20always=20ensure=20= that=20they take=20their=20own=20precautions=20to=20avoid=20virus=20contamination. =09 ______________________________________________________________________ =09_______________________________________________ =09freebsd-net@freebsd.org=20mailing=20list =09http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net =09To=20unsubscribe,=20send=20any=20mail=20to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Lee=20@=20Wildcard=20Internet t:=20(0845)=20165=201510 f:=20(0845)=20165=201511 m:=20(07795)=20423=20617 e:=20lee@wildcard.net.uk Web=20Development=20-=20Domains=20-=20Hosting=20-=20Co-location=20-=20Dedi= cated=20Servers=20 ______________________________________________________________________ This=20footer=20denotes=20the=20email=20has=20been=20inbound=20scanned=20f= or=20Virus. ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ DISCLAIMER This=20e-mail=20is=20intended=20only=20for=20the=20use=20of=20the=20addres= sees=20named=20above=20and=20may=20be=20confidential.=20If=20you=20are=20n= ot=20an=20addressee=20you=20must=20not=20use=20any=20information=20contain= ed=20in=20nor=20copy=20it=20nor=20inform=20any=20person=20other=20than=20T= eleCity=20or=20the=20addressees=20of=20its=20existence=20or=20contents.=20= If=20you=20have=20received=20this=20e-mail=20in=20error,=20please=20contac= t=20the=20TeleCity=20IT=20department=20on=20+44=20(0)=20161=20232=203220=20= or=20by=20email=20at=20techsupport@telecity.com.=20Internet=20communicatio= ns=20cannot=20be=20guaranteed=20100%=20secure,=20you=20should=20therefore=20= take=20this=20potential=20lack=20of=20security=20into=20consideration=20wh= en=20emailing=20us=20as=20we=20do=20not=20accept=20legal=20responsibility=20= for=20the=20security=20of=20the=20contents=20of=20this=20or=20other=20emai= ls.=20Whilst=20TeleCity=20take=20measures=20to=20prevent=20any=20virus=20c= ontamination=20of=20our=20computer=20systems,=20recipients=20of=20emails=20= should=20always=20ensure=20that=20they=20take=20their=20own=20precautions=20= to=20avoid=20virus=20contamination. ______________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 15:06:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B544916A41C; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:06:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iampinetan@netscape.net) Received: from imo-d02.mx.aol.com (imo-d02.mx.aol.com [205.188.157.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48ED843D48; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:06:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from iampinetan@netscape.net) Received: from iampinetan@netscape.net by imo-d02.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r1.7.) id n.19.118d4972 (22681); Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:06:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from netscape.net (mow-m01.webmail.aol.com [64.12.184.129]) by air-in04.mx.aol.com (v106.2) with ESMTP id MAILININ42-5899429dcee19d; Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:06:09 -0400 Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:06:09 -0400 From: iampinetan@netscape.net To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <131B4F54.02941BE5.0F1E5A0A@netscape.net> X-Mailer: Atlas Mailer 2.0 X-AOL-IP: 220.168.125.241 X-AOL-Language: english Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Update to OpenKETA@FreeBSD v0.81 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 15:06:16 -0000 I feel so sorry to release two news at one day. The first opened version of OpenKETA@FreeBSD(0.80-alpha) was released at 04/29/2005. And we just updated the newer version (v0.81) today. ver. 0.81: 1. Changes all initial & free functions. To avoid the error when free function try to call some uninitialed mutex when initial operations occured error. 2. Changes the init_dc function. Let user can change the setting of total DC size with the help of /etc/keta_conf/keta.conf while do not need to update the macro's definition of DC_SIZE. 3. Add valid checking process of socket list into receive thread. ***************************************** Moreover I need some help about OpenKETA@FreeBSD v0.81's stability. OpenKETA@FreeBSD will malloc more than 300 MB momory in kmem_map when it starts. When I use BenchMark Factory to test it it has pretty stability and can run more than two days continuously. While if I use SPECWeb99 to test it it just can run 5-7 hours and OS gives following information and panic kmem_malloc(4096): kmem_map too small: 629145600 total allocated I know it is the panic information of kmem_malloc. After I trace the panic context using KDB I got that all panices are results of soaccept or sosend. I cannot get any ideas about the it. When using BF the OS has more 20-30% idle CPU time, while when using SPECweb99 it will be busy 100%. Is the pager daemon can not scheduled to collect something to free memory list? What is the reasons and solutions about it? __________________________________________________________________ Switch to Netscape Internet Service. As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register Netscape. Just the Net You Need. New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups. Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 18:04:19 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B4316A41C for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:04:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mreimer@vpop.net) Received: from ring.vpop.net (ring.vpop.net [207.178.248.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7677443D69 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:04:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mreimer@vpop.net) Received: from bilbo.vpop.net (bilbo.vpop.net [70.56.77.194]) by ring.vpop.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA64AFAB05 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:04:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Reimer Organization: VPOP Technologies, Inc. To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:03:41 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506011103.41726.mreimer@vpop.net> Subject: Packets don't flow from ng_netflow X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:04:20 -0000 I'm trying to use ng_netflow to monitor our network traffic but for some reason NetFlow packets aren't emitted unless tcpdump is running on the interface configured with ng_netflow. The box is running FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE and the latest ng_netflow from ports. It has two NICs: the main NIC fxp0 which is configured for IP, and a second NIC dc0 which is up but with no IP configuration. I've configured port mirroring on our Cisco switch to tee all traffic going through our upstream port to dc0: # ifconfig dc0 dc0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 ether 00:04:5a:79:72:f7 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active netgraph config: + mkpeer dc0: netflow lower iface0 + name dc0:lower netflow + mkpeer netflow: ksocket export inet/dgram/udp + msg netflow:export connect inet/192.168.1.2:1234 The problem is that no NetFlow packets are emitted unless I run tcpdump on dc0. Is this not a valid configuration? Or is there a bug in netgraph/ng_netflow? Thanks for any help you can give. Matt From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 18:10:56 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD81E16A431 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:10:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Maksim.Yevmenkin@savvis.net) Received: from mailgate1b.savvis.net (mailgate1b.savvis.net [216.91.182.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4583943D55 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:10:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Maksim.Yevmenkin@savvis.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate1b.savvis.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E593BF37; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:10:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mailgate1b.savvis.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailgate1b.savvis.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 07357-01-68; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:10:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from out001.email.savvis.net (out001.apptix.savvis.net [216.91.32.44]) by mailgate1b.savvis.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A74B3BE2D; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:10:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from s228130hz1ew171.apptix-01.savvis.net ([10.146.4.29]) by out001.email.savvis.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:10:08 -0500 Received: from [10.254.186.111] ([66.35.239.94]) by s228130hz1ew171.apptix-01.savvis.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:10:23 -0500 Message-ID: <429DFA07.7070500@savvis.net> Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 11:10:15 -0700 From: Maksim Yevmenkin User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Reimer References: <200506011103.41726.mreimer@vpop.net> In-Reply-To: <200506011103.41726.mreimer@vpop.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Jun 2005 18:10:23.0832 (UTC) FILETIME=[2E274580:01C566D5] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at savvis.net Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Packets don't flow from ng_netflow X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:10:57 -0000 Matthew Reimer wrote: > I'm trying to use ng_netflow to monitor our network traffic but for some > reason NetFlow packets aren't emitted unless tcpdump is running on the > interface configured with ng_netflow. > > The box is running FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE and the latest ng_netflow from ports. > It has two NICs: the main NIC fxp0 which is configured for IP, and a second > NIC dc0 which is up but with no IP configuration. I've configured port > mirroring on our Cisco switch to tee all traffic going through our upstream > port to dc0: > > # ifconfig dc0 > dc0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > ether 00:04:5a:79:72:f7 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > > netgraph config: > > + mkpeer dc0: netflow lower iface0 > + name dc0:lower netflow > + mkpeer netflow: ksocket export inet/dgram/udp > + msg netflow:export connect inet/192.168.1.2:1234 > > > The problem is that no NetFlow packets are emitted unless I run tcpdump on > dc0. Is this not a valid configuration? Or is there a bug in > netgraph/ng_netflow? nope. tcpdump(1) puts interface into promiscuous mode. by default your dc0 interface will only pick packets destined for it and/or broadcast packets. please use # ifconfig dc0 promisc thanks, max From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 18:19:18 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF4516A421 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:19:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mreimer@vpop.net) Received: from ring.vpop.net (ring.vpop.net [207.178.248.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4795C43D49 for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:19:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mreimer@vpop.net) Received: from bilbo.vpop.net (bilbo.vpop.net [70.56.77.194]) by ring.vpop.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DC8AFB104; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:19:12 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Reimer Organization: VPOP Technologies, Inc. To: Maksim Yevmenkin Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:18:41 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <200506011103.41726.mreimer@vpop.net> <429DFA07.7070500@savvis.net> In-Reply-To: <429DFA07.7070500@savvis.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200506011118.41704.mreimer@vpop.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Packets don't flow from ng_netflow X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 18:19:18 -0000 On Wednesday 01 June 2005 11:10 am, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: > Matthew Reimer wrote: > > The problem is that no NetFlow packets are emitted unless I run tcpdump > > on dc0. Is this not a valid configuration? Or is there a bug in > > netgraph/ng_netflow? > > nope. tcpdump(1) puts interface into promiscuous mode. by default your > dc0 interface will only pick packets destined for it and/or broadcast > packets. please use > > # ifconfig dc0 promisc Thanks, that fixed it. Matt P. S. Thanks for the bluetooth code! From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 1 20:43:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04B516A41C; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 20:43:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from timt@sharktech.net) Received: from cluster1.bresnan.net (mail.bresnan.net [69.145.248.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A6243D1F; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 20:43:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from timt@sharktech.net) Received: from [69.146.27.144] (HELO [69.146.27.144]) by fe-3.cluster1.bresnan.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP id 18336271; Sat, 28 May 2005 18:11:49 -0600 From: Tim Timrawi Organization: SharkTECH Internet Services To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 18:12:59 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505281812.59961.timt@sharktech.net> Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD5.4 Intel SRCS16 Raid5 Problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 20:43:53 -0000 Hello, I'm running a Tyan 2882 with Dual Opteron 244 an Intel SRCS16 PCI-X with Raid5 configuration of 5 x 200GB Western Digital SATA 7.2KRPM. I installed system via CD it detected the Raid fine and identified the correct space allocation. Once it reached the installation part the install bursted to 2000KB/s than started going low to 50KB/s. Once system was installed I started having problems saving to a file. It appears to be having problems with the I/O to the device any ideas whats going on? Thanks From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 09:11:30 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFEC16A41C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:11:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from whisker.bluecoat.com (whisker.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6D5643D1F for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:11:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from bcs-mail.bluecoat.com (bcs-mail.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.69]) by whisker.bluecoat.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j529BRbx011409 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 02:11:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bcs-mail3.bluecoat.com ([10.2.2.59]) by bcs-mail.bluecoat.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 02:11:10 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 02:11:09 -0700 Message-ID: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C010AF780@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: issue with route Thread-Index: AcVnDS0rn+p7NrA8QnOJNrdxqTKxDAARb+PAAAAAL/A= From: "Li, Qing" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jun 2005 09:11:10.0001 (UTC) FILETIME=[042E3210:01C56753] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 216.52.23.28 Subject: issue with route X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 09:11:30 -0000 =20 When I issued the following command by accident today: =20 route add default -inet6 fe80:20d:56ff:fe8d:d4b0%fxp0 The netstat shows the following: Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default fe80:20d:56ff:fe8d:d4b0%fxp0 UGS 0 0 fxp0 10.9.44/24 link#1 U 1 0 fxp0 10.9.44.175 127.0.0.1 UGHS 0 0 lo0 127.0.0.1 link#4 UH 1 4 lo0 So I went ahead and issued route add 10.1.1.1 -inet6 fe80::1%fxp0=20 Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default fe80:20d:56ff:fe8d:d4b0%fxp0 UGS 0 0 fxp0 10.1.1.1 fe80::1%fxp0 UGHS 0 0 fxp0 10.9.44/24 link#1 U 1 0 fxp0 10.9.44.175 127.0.0.1 UGHS 0 0 lo0 127.0.0.1 link#4 UH 1 4 lo0 I verified this behavior on both FreeBSD 5.4 Release and 6.0-CURRENT. I think this behavior is probably not intended and should be treated as a bug. I did a quick patch in sys/net/route.c (it's just as easy in sbin/route.c). ------------- heavygear# cvs diff route.c Index: route.c =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/net/route.c,v retrieving revision 1.108 diff -r1.108 route.c 746c747,748 < if ((flags & RTF_GATEWAY) && !gateway) --- > if (flags & RTF_GATEWAY) { > if (!gateway) 747a750,752 > if (dst && (dst->sa_family !=3D = gateway->sa_family)) > senderr(EPERM); > } ------------- After the patch, ------------- heavygear# route add 10.1.1.1 -inet6 fe80::1%fxp0 route: writing to routing socket: Operation not permitted =20 Comments ? Thanks, -- Qing From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 09:36:26 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9602816A420 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:36:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Received: from Neo-Vortex.net (203-173-58-65.dyn.iinet.net.au [203.173.58.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B496E43D48 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:36:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Received: from localhost.Neo-Vortex.net (Neo-Vortex@localhost.Neo-Vortex.net [127.0.0.1]) by Neo-Vortex.net (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j529aEje081738; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:36:14 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:36:14 +1000 (EST) From: Neo-Vortex To: "Li, Qing" In-Reply-To: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C010AF780@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> Message-ID: <20050602192332.U79666@Neo-Vortex.net> References: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C010AF780@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: issue with route X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 09:36:26 -0000 On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Li, Qing wrote: > route add 10.1.1.1 -inet6 fe80::1%fxp0 Out of curiosity, how are packets actually routed when using this? ~Neo-Vortex From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 11:33:29 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F2C16A41C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 11:33:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979D743D49 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 11:33:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 56888 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2005 11:27:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) ([62.48.0.53]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Jun 2005 11:27:41 -0000 Message-ID: <429EEE8C.86657ED1@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 13:33:32 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Li, Qing" References: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C010AF780@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: issue with route X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 11:33:29 -0000 "Li, Qing" wrote: > > > When I issued the following command by accident today: > > route add default -inet6 fe80:20d:56ff:fe8d:d4b0%fxp0 > > The netstat shows the following: > > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif > Expire > default fe80:20d:56ff:fe8d:d4b0%fxp0 UGS 0 > 0 fxp0 > 10.9.44/24 link#1 U 1 0 fxp0 > 10.9.44.175 127.0.0.1 UGHS 0 0 lo0 > 127.0.0.1 link#4 UH 1 4 lo0 > > So I went ahead and issued > > route add 10.1.1.1 -inet6 fe80::1%fxp0 > > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif > Expire > default fe80:20d:56ff:fe8d:d4b0%fxp0 UGS 0 > 0 fxp0 > 10.1.1.1 fe80::1%fxp0 UGHS 0 0 fxp0 > 10.9.44/24 link#1 U 1 0 fxp0 > 10.9.44.175 127.0.0.1 UGHS 0 0 lo0 > 127.0.0.1 link#4 UH 1 4 lo0 > > I verified this behavior on both FreeBSD 5.4 Release and 6.0-CURRENT. Looks very strange indeed. > I think this behavior is probably not intended and should be treated > as a bug. I did a quick patch in sys/net/route.c > (it's just as easy in sbin/route.c). Unless this causes or supposed to cause some kind of automagic IPv4 in IPv6 encapsulation? Can you check out if this is not the case (RFC references, KAME folks)? > ------------- > heavygear# cvs diff route.c > Index: route.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/net/route.c,v retrieving revision 1.108 > diff > -r1.108 route.c > 746c747,748 > < if ((flags & RTF_GATEWAY) && !gateway) > --- > > if (flags & RTF_GATEWAY) { > > if (!gateway) > 747a750,752 > > if (dst && (dst->sa_family != gateway->sa_family)) > > senderr(EPERM); > > } > ------------- Please post unified diffs, they are far easier to read for humans. > After the patch, > > ------------- > heavygear# route add 10.1.1.1 -inet6 fe80::1%fxp0 > route: writing to routing socket: Operation not permitted EINVAL might be a more appropriate error code. -- Andre From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 12:35:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC2C16A41F; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:35:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Received: from cheer.mahoroba.org (gw4.mahoroba.org [218.45.22.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A6B43D54; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:35:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Received: from lyrics.mahoroba.org (ume@lyrics.mahoroba.org [IPv6:3ffe:501:185b:8010:280:88ff:fe03:4841]) (user=ume mech=CRAM-MD5 bits=0) by cheer.mahoroba.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP/inet6 id j52CZMwG084689 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 21:35:23 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 21:35:19 +0900 Message-ID: From: Hajimu UMEMOTO To: Andre Oppermann In-Reply-To: <429EEE8C.86657ED1@freebsd.org> References: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C010AF780@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> <429EEE8C.86657ED1@freebsd.org> User-Agent: xcite1.38> Wanderlust/2.15.1 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.0.50 (i386-unknown-freebsd5.4) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-PGP-Key: http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/publickey.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F00 0B9E 2164 70FC 6DC5 BF5F 04E9 F086 BF90 71FE Organization: Internet Mutual Aid Society, YOKOHAMA MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0b5 (cheer.mahoroba.org [IPv6:3ffe:501:185b:8010::1]); Thu, 02 Jun 2005 21:35:23 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on cheer.mahoroba.org Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Li, Qing" Subject: Re: issue with route X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 12:35:38 -0000 Hi, >>>>> On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 13:33:32 +0200 >>>>> Andre Oppermann said: > I think this behavior is probably not intended and should be treated > as a bug. I did a quick patch in sys/net/route.c > (it's just as easy in sbin/route.c). andre> Unless this causes or supposed to cause some kind of automagic andre> IPv4 in IPv6 encapsulation? Can you check out if this is not andre> the case (RFC references, KAME folks)? I believe it is not intended. IIRC, USAGI has automatic tunnel. So, such route is valid on Linux, and it means IPv4 over IPv6 tunnel. KAME doesn't have such feature. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 14:17:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA2B16A41C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:17:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lysergius2001@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE93843D1F for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 14:17:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lysergius2001@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so296647wra for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 07:17:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=U9ywCQWsgwsQ6/63fQoB+xdOtCWLYS8Ce5V1bIlKxsu7CJc2zzkPwXh5wUz5SVbUU2gOKPZfr/d1eAC53h0breHkVs68Yrov163tvntbLkyy75phOJFQaNPI00nuXIoRsH29XU4RuxbFeqYz7YG3mTQgNQe4bQlJO9pt/YygtJ4= Received: by 10.54.50.12 with SMTP id x12mr474627wrx; Thu, 02 Jun 2005 07:16:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.66.3 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 07:16:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:16:45 +0100 From: lysergius2001 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: ndiscvt make failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lysergius2001 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 14:17:21 -0000 Can anyone help?=20 I am trying to install Belkin fd57000 pci wireless card in a box running= =20 FBSD 5.3. I got as far as compiling ndiscvt but the compile breaks with a= =20 very long list of errors. I have checked and double checked each step of th= e=20 process as set out in the manual and various sources on the web. I know it= =20 can be done... but??? Many thanks --=20 Lysergius says, "Stay light, but trust gravity" From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 18:04:22 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3864416A41C; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:04:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from whisker.bluecoat.com (whisker.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0679143D48; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:04:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from bcs-mail.bluecoat.com (bcs-mail.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.69]) by whisker.bluecoat.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j52I4Kbw007678; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 11:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bcs-mail3.bluecoat.com ([10.2.2.59]) by bcs-mail.bluecoat.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 11:04:02 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 11:04:02 -0700 Message-ID: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C010AF884@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: issue with route Thread-Index: AcVnZuLHB/gcrGicSSedHqFKScgRkQANMkKA From: "Li, Qing" To: "Andre Oppermann" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jun 2005 18:04:02.0474 (UTC) FILETIME=[754268A0:01C5679D] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 216.52.23.28 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: issue with route X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:04:22 -0000 >=20 > Please post unified diffs, they are far easier to read for humans. >=20 Sorry, here is the patch again. -- Qing Index: route.c =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/net/route.c,v retrieving revision 1.108 diff -u -r1.108 route.c --- route.c 7 Jan 2005 01:45:35 -0000 1.108 +++ route.c 2 Jun 2005 17:49:28 -0000 @@ -743,8 +743,12 @@ goto makeroute; case RTM_ADD: - if ((flags & RTF_GATEWAY) && !gateway) - panic("rtrequest: GATEWAY but no gateway"); + if (flags & RTF_GATEWAY) { + if (!gateway) + panic("rtrequest: GATEWAY but no gateway"); + if (dst && (dst->sa_family !=3D gateway->sa_family)) + senderr(EINVAL); + } if (info->rti_ifa =3D=3D NULL && (error =3D = rt_getifa(info))) senderr(error); From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 18:23:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD8F16A41C; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:23:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from whisker.bluecoat.com (whisker.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F13143D54; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:23:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from bcs-mail.bluecoat.com (bcs-mail.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.69]) by whisker.bluecoat.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j52INRlx008809; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 11:23:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bcs-mail3.bluecoat.com ([10.2.2.59]) by bcs-mail.bluecoat.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 11:23:09 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 11:23:08 -0700 Message-ID: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C010AF88F@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: issue with route Thread-Index: AcVnZuLHB/gcrGicSSedHqFKScgRkQAONEcA From: "Li, Qing" To: "Andre Oppermann" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jun 2005 18:23:09.0359 (UTC) FILETIME=[20DB2BF0:01C567A0] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 216.52.23.28 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: issue with route X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:23:28 -0000 >=20 > EINVAL might be a more appropriate error code. >=20 --------- heavygear# route add 10.1.1.1 -inet6 fe80::1%fxp0 route: writing to routing socket: Invalid argument add host 10.1.1.1: gateway fe80::1%fxp0: Invalid argument --------- You're right. Thanks, -- Qing From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 18:41:38 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1211E16A41C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:41:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510E843D48 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 18:41:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andre@freebsd.org) Received: (qmail 59931 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2005 18:35:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) ([62.48.0.53]) (envelope-sender ) by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Jun 2005 18:35:46 -0000 Message-ID: <429F52E3.53FB6C9@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 20:41:39 +0200 From: Andre Oppermann X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.8 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Li, Qing" References: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C010AF884@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: issue with route X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:41:38 -0000 "Li, Qing" wrote: > > > > > Please post unified diffs, they are far easier to read for humans. > > > > Sorry, here is the patch again. > > -- Qing > > Index: route.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/net/route.c,v > retrieving revision 1.108 > diff -u -r1.108 route.c > --- route.c 7 Jan 2005 01:45:35 -0000 1.108 > +++ route.c 2 Jun 2005 17:49:28 -0000 > @@ -743,8 +743,12 @@ > goto makeroute; > > case RTM_ADD: > - if ((flags & RTF_GATEWAY) && !gateway) > - panic("rtrequest: GATEWAY but no gateway"); > + if (flags & RTF_GATEWAY) { > + if (!gateway) > + panic("rtrequest: GATEWAY but no gateway"); > + if (dst && (dst->sa_family != gateway->sa_family)) > + senderr(EINVAL); > + } > > if (info->rti_ifa == NULL && (error = rt_getifa(info))) > senderr(error); There are some style issues with you proposal. For every "if" you need to indent by one tab, like this: case RTM_ADD: if (flags & RTF_GATEWAY) { if (!gateway) panic("rtrequest: GATEWAY but no gateway"); if (dst && (dst->sa_family != gateway->sa_family)) senderr(EINVAL); } if (info->rti_ifa == NULL && (error = rt_getifa(info))) senderr(error); There are tab/whitespace issues as well, but I think that is due to you using Outbreak as mailer. Here is my alternative version with slightly expanded scope of the gateway address family check. I've converted the panic to an EINVAL as well. We don't want to panic the box if someone screws up a routing socket message. case RTM_ADD: if ((flags & RTF_GATEWAY) && !gateway) senderr(EINVAL); if (dst && gateway && (dst->sa_family != gateway->sa_family)) senderr(EINVAL); if (info->rti_ifa == NULL && (error = rt_getifa(info))) senderr(error); ifa = info->rti_ifa; Please check if my variant does the right thing in all cases. If you can confirm, then you can go ahead and write up a descriptive commit message. You can find some examples in the cvs log of sys/net/route.c: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/net/route.c Then please send me your final patch including proposed commit message for final review again. After that, when no more issues arise, you can go ahead and commit the change. Once you've been a few times through this precedure you get more and more familiar with the FreeBSD-way of making code changes. And after a while, when you are fluent in FreeBSDism, you get on your own and out of mentorship. Oh, BTW. Don't be afraid when you get brucified. Bruce' style comments are a very valuable learning resource. Everyone of us got brucified more than once. ;-) (I'm talking about Bruce Evans, bde@) -- Andre From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 19:25:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6466D16A41C; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:25:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp) Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp [202.249.10.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B978F43D1D; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:25:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp) Received: from ocean.jinmei.org (unknown [2001:4f8:3:bb:e083:3191:14d:bd2]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9249A1521B; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 04:28:05 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 04:25:59 +0900 Message-ID: From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= To: Andre Oppermann In-Reply-To: <429EEE8C.86657ED1@freebsd.org> References: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C010AF780@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> <429EEE8C.86657ED1@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan. MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Li, Qing" Subject: Re: issue with route X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 19:25:06 -0000 >>>>> On Thu, 02 Jun 2005 13:33:32 +0200, >>>>> Andre Oppermann said: >> I verified this behavior on both FreeBSD 5.4 Release and 6.0-CURRENT. > Looks very strange indeed. >> I think this behavior is probably not intended and should be treated >> as a bug. I did a quick patch in sys/net/route.c >> (it's just as easy in sbin/route.c). > Unless this causes or supposed to cause some kind of automagic > IPv4 in IPv6 encapsulation? Can you check out if this is not > the case (RFC references, KAME folks)? This is not the deliberate behavior. I believe prohibiting the mixture of different address families (for a gateway) is the right thing. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 19:47:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5A016A41C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:47:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from whisker.bluecoat.com (whisker.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BD0D43D48 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 19:47:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from bcs-mail.bluecoat.com (bcs-mail.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.69]) by whisker.bluecoat.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j52JkpPq013628; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:46:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bcs-mail3.bluecoat.com ([10.2.2.59]) by bcs-mail.bluecoat.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:46:33 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:46:33 -0700 Message-ID: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C010AF8D2@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: RADIX_MPATH support Thread-Index: AcVnq8dUqeSTlLQNTfOEMm0vAddwpQ== From: "Li, Qing" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jun 2005 19:46:33.0684 (UTC) FILETIME=[C7AA9140:01C567AB] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 216.52.23.28 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RADIX_MPATH support X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 19:47:06 -0000 Hi, Is RADIX_MPATH still supported in KAME ? Enabling RADIX_MPATH on FreeBSD 5.4 panic on bootup and the system just reset. I cannot get into the debugger. After investigating the same code on a FreeBSD 5.4 based variant system, I found the deletion code appears to be a bit problematic and crashes my box. I have patched the following files, and at least on my system the code appears to be functioning correctly. kame/freebsd5/sys/net/route.c kame/freebsd5/sys/net/rtsock.c kame/kame/sys/net/radix_mpath.c kame/kame/sys/net/radix_mpath.h The rtsock.c file does not compile due to "gate" being undefined once the RADIX_MPATH option is enabled. I checked the revision numbers of each file and all seem to be current. Has anyone else run into the same problem ? Thanks, -- Qing =09 From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 22:29:03 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E7216A41C for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 22:29:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Received: from Neo-Vortex.net (203-173-58-65.dyn.iinet.net.au [203.173.58.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4851C43D53 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 22:29:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Received: from localhost.Neo-Vortex.net (Neo-Vortex@localhost.Neo-Vortex.net [127.0.0.1]) by Neo-Vortex.net (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j52MSwJl094010; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 08:28:58 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 08:28:58 +1000 (EST) From: Neo-Vortex To: lysergius2001 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20050603082759.E93733@Neo-Vortex.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ndiscvt make failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 22:29:03 -0000 On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, lysergius2001 wrote: > Can anyone help? > I am trying to install Belkin fd57000 pci wireless card in a box running > FBSD 5.3. I got as far as compiling ndiscvt but the compile breaks with a > very long list of errors. I have checked and double checked each step of the > process as set out in the manual and various sources on the web. I know it > can be done... but??? IIRC, ndiscvt is already present on a standard install of 5.3 without needing to compile it manually... (you still have to compile the driver though) - check if it exists in your path... ~Neo-Vortex From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 23:02:00 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28F616A41C; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 23:02:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from whisker.bluecoat.com (whisker.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6197643D49; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 23:02:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from bcs-mail.bluecoat.com (bcs-mail.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.69]) by whisker.bluecoat.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j52N1w10024678; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:01:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bcs-mail3.bluecoat.com ([10.2.2.59]) by bcs-mail.bluecoat.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:01:40 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:01:40 -0700 Message-ID: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C010AF92D@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: issue with route Thread-Index: AcVnoqyTd3LymZU6ROGsPczVYI32+gAI6YsA From: "Li, Qing" To: "Andre Oppermann" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Jun 2005 23:01:40.0875 (UTC) FILETIME=[09B225B0:01C567C7] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 216.52.23.28 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: issue with route X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 23:02:01 -0000 >=20 > Please check if my variant does the right thing in all cases.=20 > If you can confirm, then you can go ahead and write up a=20 > descriptive commit message.=20 > Okay, I will verify your version. > > Then please send me your final patch including proposed=20 > commit message for final review again. After that, when no=20 > more issues arise, you can go ahead and commit the change. >=20 > Oh, BTW. Don't be afraid when you get brucified. Bruce'=20 > Does anyone have a good .emacs that conforms to style(9)=20 that could share with me?=20 That might just save me a lot of pain from the=20 inevitable brucifixion. Thanks, -- Qing From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 2 23:31:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA9F16A41C; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 23:31:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: from b.mail.sonic.net (b.mail.sonic.net [64.142.19.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9852C43D49; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 23:31:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: from tomcat.kitchenlab.org (tomcat.kitchenlab.org [64.142.31.107]) by b.mail.sonic.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j52NVFOu026841 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:31:16 -0700 Received: from tomcat.kitchenlab.org (localhost.kitchenlab.org [127.0.0.1]) by tomcat.kitchenlab.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j52NVFck049541; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:31:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by tomcat.kitchenlab.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j52NVFZj049540; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:31:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: tomcat.kitchenlab.org: bmah set sender to bmah@freebsd.org using -f From: "Bruce A. Mah" To: Andre Oppermann In-Reply-To: <429F52E3.53FB6C9@freebsd.org> References: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C010AF884@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> <429F52E3.53FB6C9@freebsd.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-vEh8dXVebhHc7BJ1Om0h" Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 16:31:14 -0700 Message-Id: <1117755074.97171.111.camel@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, "Li, Qing" , bmah@freebsd.org Subject: Re: issue with route X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 23:31:18 -0000 --=-vEh8dXVebhHc7BJ1Om0h Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Andre Oppermann wrote: > Oh, BTW. Don't be afraid when you get brucified. Bruce' style > comments are a very valuable learning resource. Everyone of us got > brucified more than once. ;-) (I'm talking about Bruce Evans, bde@) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Thanks for clarifying that. :-) BTW I've been brucified too, which I'm sure was a bewildering experience for those who witnessed it. Bruce. --=-vEh8dXVebhHc7BJ1Om0h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCn5bC2MoxcVugUsMRAq/sAKCGqkVB8u6ml1F3BP6En6u6ld5TRQCg9Kzf IOQbC37ObQ6xmBtUevx0/+w= =ZMYX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-vEh8dXVebhHc7BJ1Om0h-- From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 01:30:11 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D340C16A41C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 01:30:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keiichi@iijlab.net) Received: from omgo.iij.ad.jp (omgo.iij.ad.jp [202.232.30.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6022F43D48 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 01:30:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keiichi@iijlab.net) Received: OTM-MO id j531U5om022585; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:30:05 +0900 (JST) Received: OTM-MIX0 id j531U4Xm004997; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:30:04 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (jc-ssh.iij.ad.jp [192.168.174.22]) by jc-smtp.iij.ad.jp (JC-SMTP/jc-smtp) id j531U4LZ001703; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:30:04 +0900 (JST) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 10:30:04 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20050603.103004.177860528.keiichi@iijlab.net> To: snap-users@kame.net, qing.li@bluecoat.com From: Keiichi SHIMA In-Reply-To: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C010AF8D2@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> References: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C010AF8D2@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2.52 on Emacs 21.3.50 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (KAME-snap 9091) RADIX_MPATH support X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 01:30:11 -0000 Hi, From: "Li, Qing" Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:46:33 -0700 > Is RADIX_MPATH still supported in KAME ? > > Enabling RADIX_MPATH on FreeBSD 5.4 panic on bootup and the > system just reset. I cannot get into the debugger. The KAME RADIS_MPATH is supported only on NetBSD. FreeBSD maay be compiable with the option, but it will not work properly. Regards, --- Keiichi Shima IIJ Research Laboratory KAME project From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 02:01:44 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B285016A41C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 02:01:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thompsa@fud.org.nz) Received: from heff.fud.org.nz (60-234-149-201.bitstream.orcon.net.nz [60.234.149.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5250A43D49 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 02:01:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thompsa@fud.org.nz) Received: from thompsa by heff.fud.org.nz with local (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1De1VE-0005z3-OO for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 14:01:40 +1200 Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:01:40 +1200 From: Andrew Thompson To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050603020140.GA22870@heff.fud.org.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: Andrew Thompson Subject: xxconfig for if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 02:01:44 -0000 Hi, The if_bridge code that will soon be committed can be configured using either brconfig or ifconfig. http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/ Only one tool will be committed and I would like to get opinions on which one ppl prefer brconfig - new util to /sbin + same as NetBSD/OpenBSD - would require new rc.d script and rc.conf keywords ifconfig (patched for if_bridge) + one tool to rule them all + seamless with rc.conf, ifconfig_bridge0="..." - diverges from the other BSDs Andrew From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 03:37:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9998C16A41C; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 03:37:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D71743D48; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 03:37:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j533bF6h009848; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:37:15 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id j533bFif009847; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:37:15 -0700 Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:37:15 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Andrew Thompson Message-ID: <20050603033715.GA1689@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <20050603020140.GA22870@heff.fud.org.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050603020140.GA22870@heff.fud.org.nz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xxconfig for if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 03:37:16 -0000 --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 02:01:40PM +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote: > Hi, >=20 >=20 > The if_bridge code that will soon be committed can be configured using > either brconfig or ifconfig. >=20 > http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/ >=20 > Only one tool will be committed and I would like to get opinions on > which one ppl prefer >=20 > brconfig > - new util to /sbin > + same as NetBSD/OpenBSD > - would require new rc.d script and rc.conf keywords > =20 > ifconfig (patched for if_bridge) > + one tool to rule them all > + seamless with rc.conf, ifconfig_bridge0=3D"..." > - diverges from the other BSDs ifconfig is strongly prefered. With Sam's extensable ifconfig in current, nearly all the various network related *config/*control commands should be considered deprecated. The preliforation of xxconfig commands stems more form the difficulty of hacking ifconfig then any good reason, IMO. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCn9BqXY6L6fI4GtQRAmHzAKCsx3ffWHIOQ+rrZznBQ4i+kps/DACeLG8o 7WbIUWUnRrVtWRjwlVKCQjU= =OETs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bp/iNruPH9dso1Pn-- From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 03:39:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B6E16A41F for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 03:39:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from whisker.bluecoat.com (whisker.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B85E43D53 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 03:39:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from bcs-mail.bluecoat.com (bcs-mail.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.69]) by whisker.bluecoat.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j533doxl005213; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:39:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bcs-mail3.bluecoat.com ([10.2.2.59]) by bcs-mail.bluecoat.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:39:32 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 20:39:32 -0700 Message-ID: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C010AF973@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: (KAME-snap 9091) RADIX_MPATH support Thread-Index: AcVn271FM4OqA1PXQJ+HEj+QjhdwNwAEcsLw From: "Li, Qing" To: "Keiichi SHIMA" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jun 2005 03:39:32.0586 (UTC) FILETIME=[DACF5CA0:01C567ED] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 216.52.23.28 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: (KAME-snap 9091) RADIX_MPATH support X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 03:39:52 -0000 >=20 > The KAME RADIS_MPATH is supported only on NetBSD. >=20 I should have read IMPLEMENTATION more carefully. > > FreeBSD maay be compiable with the option, but it will not=20 > work properly. >=20 I will try fixing the FreeBSD boot problem and then=20 submit the changes for review if there is general=20 interest in getting RADIX_MPATH working on FreeBSD. Thanks, -- Qing From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 04:03:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B784816A41C; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 04:03:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Received: from cheer.mahoroba.org (gw4.mahoroba.org [218.45.22.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43DFB43D49; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 04:03:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Received: from lyrics.mahoroba.org (ume@lyrics.mahoroba.org [IPv6:3ffe:501:185b:8010:280:88ff:fe03:4841]) (user=ume mech=CRAM-MD5 bits=0) by cheer.mahoroba.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP/inet6 id j5343YXx049868 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 3 Jun 2005 13:03:34 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 13:03:31 +0900 Message-ID: From: Hajimu UMEMOTO To: Andrew Thompson In-Reply-To: <20050603020140.GA22870@heff.fud.org.nz> References: <20050603020140.GA22870@heff.fud.org.nz> User-Agent: xcite1.38> Wanderlust/2.15.1 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.0.50 (i386-unknown-freebsd5.4) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-PGP-Key: http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/publickey.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F00 0B9E 2164 70FC 6DC5 BF5F 04E9 F086 BF90 71FE Organization: Internet Mutual Aid Society, YOKOHAMA MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender succeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0b5 (cheer.mahoroba.org [IPv6:3ffe:501:185b:8010::1]); Fri, 03 Jun 2005 13:03:34 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.0.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on cheer.mahoroba.org Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xxconfig for if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 04:03:43 -0000 Hi, >>>>> On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:01:40 +1200 >>>>> Andrew Thompson said: thompsa> The if_bridge code that will soon be committed can be configured using thompsa> either brconfig or ifconfig. thompsa> http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/ thompsa> Only one tool will be committed and I would like to get opinions on thompsa> which one ppl prefer thompsa> brconfig thompsa> - new util to /sbin thompsa> + same as NetBSD/OpenBSD thompsa> - would require new rc.d script and rc.conf keywords thompsa> ifconfig (patched for if_bridge) thompsa> + one tool to rule them all thompsa> + seamless with rc.conf, ifconfig_bridge0="..." thompsa> - diverges from the other BSDs As for gif(4), once gifconfig(8) was introduced, then the feature was merged into ifconfig(8) and gifconfig(8) was removed. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 04:26:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF1316A41C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 04:26:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smartweb@leadhill.net) Received: from natco8.natcotech.com (natco8.natcotech.com [205.167.142.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B95143D1D for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 04:26:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smartweb@leadhill.net) Received: from localhost (int9.natcotech.com [192.168.1.9]) by natco8.natcotech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719DF29804B for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 23:26:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from natco8.natcotech.com ([192.168.1.8]) by localhost (natco9 [192.168.1.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02885-01-7 for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 23:26:32 -0500 (CDT) Received: from ibm.nlcc.us (ldhl-ras1-dial-12-28-24-127.natcotech.com [12.28.24.127]) by natco8.natcotech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3CE29801F for ; Thu, 2 Jun 2005 23:26:31 -0500 (CDT) Received: (qmail 38561 invoked by uid 89); 3 Jun 2005 04:26:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.2?) (billy@192.168.0.2) by ibm.nlcc.us with SMTP; 3 Jun 2005 04:26:31 -0000 Message-ID: <429FDBF7.3050709@leadhill.net> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 23:26:31 -0500 From: Billy Newsom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at natco9.natcotech.com Subject: ipnat problems on RELENG_5 (ipnat fails to load its tables) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 04:26:33 -0000 Since I am having ipnat problems on FreeBSD 5.4, and none on 5.3, I was hoping to help out the matter of tracking down the bug. I was wanting a little help with backing out some CVS changes made in the last three months to the kernel. I see now that ipnat has undergone a major update between 5.3 and 5.4. And whatever happened, caused me (and apparently a few others) grief: ipnat won't load its tables at boot time, although it runs as if it is fine. I have filed a PR, and started a thread on freebsd-stable, but now I need some help. I have tried the only suggestion I got on the other list -- to enable ipv6. No good. My future plans are to run the GENERIC kernel (but one person with this problem was using the GENERIC kernel), and to backout the CVS changes. I don't really know how to build a custom kernel like this, though. Also, is there any debugging or programs I could run during the times of failure to see any unusual activity on the systems? See PR 81606 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/81606 See threads at http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-May/015329.html and http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2005-May/015507.html See CVS changes at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ The maintainer and author of ipfilter was doing this: "Merge the changes from 3.4.35 to 4.1.8 into the kernel source tree" Thanks Billy From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 07:51:17 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FFD16A41C; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 07:51:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from mrout1-b.corp.dcn.yahoo.com (mrout1-b.corp.dcn.yahoo.com [216.109.112.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AB2743D48; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 07:51:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from guest-83.lobby.yahoo.com.neville-neil.com (proxy7.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.48.98]) by mrout1-b.corp.dcn.yahoo.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/y.out) with ESMTP id j537pASJ058238; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 00:51:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 00:51:13 -0700 Message-ID: From: gnn@freebsd.org To: Andrew Thompson In-Reply-To: <20050603020140.GA22870@heff.fud.org.nz> References: <20050603020140.GA22870@heff.fud.org.nz> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.12.2 (99 Luftballons) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.2 (powerpc-apple-darwin) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xxconfig for if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 07:51:18 -0000 At Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:01:40 +1200, Andrew Thompson wrote: > ifconfig (patched for if_bridge) > + one tool to rule them all > + seamless with rc.conf, ifconfig_bridge0="..." > - diverges from the other BSDs I prefer ifconfig. I don't like having a plethora of these tools, it is confusing to the users and makes concise documentation difficult. Thanks, George From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 08:05:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A53016A41C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 08:05:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lysergius2001@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A1943D1D for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 08:05:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lysergius2001@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 50so1439638wri for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 01:05:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=INaWkXPudmTtb8X6///HRp6ULhpmTxe2u0TqmcRsGmcaUEb2eESBg6L8OR1J3C7xtFMoYoC6Tt64lGgeSnlbzGllaqQ1sHURto/ZEHT5vrTbLGgFqoylibLRWlA1s4lOHct1L8YSKyNUTe0mXTmBPUVLGjcWO+Ua1bscl3kMg8I= Received: by 10.54.40.57 with SMTP id n57mr958826wrn; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 01:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.66.3 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 01:05:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:05:31 +0100 From: lysergius2001 To: Neo-Vortex In-Reply-To: <20050603082759.E93733@Neo-Vortex.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20050603082759.E93733@Neo-Vortex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ndiscvt make failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lysergius2001 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 08:05:33 -0000 Thanks for this. My mistake I have got this far We will now use the ndiscvt utility to create the driver definition headerndis_driver_data.hto build the module: # *ndiscvt -i W32DRIVER.INF -s W32DRIVER.SYS -o ndis_driver_data.h* The -i and -s options specify the configuration and binary files,=20 respectively. We use the -o ndis_driver_data.h option because the Makefilewill be looking for this file when it comes time to build the module. * Note: *Some Windows drivers require additional files to operate. You may= =20 include them with ndiscvt by using the -f option. Consult the ndiscvt(8)=20 manual page for more information. Finally, we can build and install the driver module: # *make && make install* This is the point at which it breaks... =20 On 02/06/05, Neo-Vortex wrote:=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, lysergius2001 wrote: >=20 > > Can anyone help? > > I am trying to install Belkin fd57000 pci wireless card in a box runnin= g > > FBSD 5.3. I got as far as compiling ndiscvt but the compile breaks with= =20 > a > > very long list of errors. I have checked and double checked each step o= f=20 > the > > process as set out in the manual and various sources on the web. I know= =20 > it > > can be done... but??? >=20 > IIRC, ndiscvt is already present on a standard install of 5.3 without > needing to compile it manually... (you still have to compile the driver > though) - check if it exists in your path... >=20 > ~Neo-Vortex >=20 --=20 Lysergius says, "Stay light, but trust gravity" From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 08:11:28 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1427316A41C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 08:11:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Received: from Neo-Vortex.net (203-173-58-65.dyn.iinet.net.au [203.173.58.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CAA843D53 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 08:11:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Received: from localhost.Neo-Vortex.net (Neo-Vortex@localhost.Neo-Vortex.net [127.0.0.1]) by Neo-Vortex.net (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j538BOId079523; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 18:11:25 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 18:11:24 +1000 (EST) From: Neo-Vortex To: lysergius2001 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20050603181051.V78789@Neo-Vortex.net> References: <20050603082759.E93733@Neo-Vortex.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ndiscvt make failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 08:11:28 -0000 On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, lysergius2001 wrote: > # *make && make install* > > This is the point at which it breaks... Appears to be correct (and the stuff above) - want to paste the last 10-20 lines of output? ~Neo-Vortex From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 10:11:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB75116A41C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:11:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lysergius2001@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE7043D1F for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 10:11:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lysergius2001@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so242030wra for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 03:11:01 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=oYwGg1pvjbDrNQVvMgPSE+j7H3urmmoDNKaxILVnjHpICj8iCIrm+smXWSbwCXc3kPB96Tkynx6QstYCD0exBIOqYSJW1Aq1H3nTgRq7CK03VA3CG6GG+I+cFHa6AZd7MAmiwJWM6NgsmPQgoxMli3pcvAlzaTZ/bv5foWYWRLs= Received: by 10.54.23.26 with SMTP id 26mr1028525wrw; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 03:10:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.66.3 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 03:10:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 11:10:19 +0100 From: lysergius2001 To: Neo-Vortex In-Reply-To: <20050603181051.V78789@Neo-Vortex.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20050603082759.E93733@Neo-Vortex.net> <20050603181051.V78789@Neo-Vortex.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ndiscvt make failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: lysergius2001 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 10:11:02 -0000 Sure, but its 1800 lines of the same three failures over and over again...= =20 On 03/06/05, Neo-Vortex wrote:=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, lysergius2001 wrote: >=20 > > # *make && make install* > > > > This is the point at which it breaks... >=20 > Appears to be correct (and the stuff above) - want to paste the last 10-2= 0 > lines of output? >=20 > ~Neo-Vortex >=20 --=20 Lysergius says, "Stay light, but trust gravity" From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 13:38:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC0316A41C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 13:38:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Received: from Neo-Vortex.net (203-173-58-65.dyn.iinet.net.au [203.173.58.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9335243D53 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 13:38:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Received: from localhost.Neo-Vortex.net (Neo-Vortex@localhost.Neo-Vortex.net [127.0.0.1]) by Neo-Vortex.net (8.13.1/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j53DcYr8027060; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:38:34 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from root@Neo-Vortex.net) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:38:34 +1000 (EST) From: Neo-Vortex To: lysergius2001 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20050603233753.X26783@Neo-Vortex.net> References: <20050603082759.E93733@Neo-Vortex.net> <20050603181051.V78789@Neo-Vortex.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ndiscvt make failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 13:38:39 -0000 On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, lysergius2001 wrote: > Sure, but its 1800 lines of the same three failures over and over again... Yep, thats why i said 10-20 lines... i only need one line if its all the same thing... but some error message is better than "i get an error message" > > On 03/06/05, Neo-Vortex wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, lysergius2001 wrote: > > > > > # *make && make install* > > > > > > This is the point at which it breaks... > > > > Appears to be correct (and the stuff above) - want to paste the last 10-20 > > lines of output? > > > > ~Neo-Vortex > > From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 14:41:58 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F1216A41C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:41:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lattice@morden.com) Received: from p54837471.dip.t-dialin.net (p54837471.dip.t-dialin.net [84.131.116.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 77CB943D48 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:41:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lattice@morden.com) Received: from [134.164.66.78] (port=4463 helo=[ascribed]) by p54837471.dip.t-dialin.net with esmtp id 7879931806naught13677 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:42:06 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v728) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <41750118408.7104862841@p54837471.dip.t-dialin.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Marion Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:42:05 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.728) Subject: Make your life full of grand impressions! X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 14:41:58 -0000 An awesome way to strengthen your erections http://gbe.t8e4futm8ltjxub.upshootgm.com Drawing on my fine command of language, I said nothing. Learn as much by writing as by reading. Jews don't go camping. Life is hard enough as it is. From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 18:16:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7831216A41C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 18:16:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) Received: from mail15.bluewin.ch (mail15.bluewin.ch [195.186.18.63]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 252B943D1D for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 18:16:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) Received: from gicco.homeip.net (83.77.54.4) by mail15.bluewin.ch (Bluewin 7.2.060.1) id 42A02C33000186DC for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 18:16:38 +0000 Received: from snoopy.here (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gicco.homeip.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j53IGbtu054928 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:16:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) Received: (from hampi@localhost) by snoopy.here (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id j53IGbDv054927 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:16:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) X-Authentication-Warning: snoopy.here: hampi set sender to hampi@rootshell.be using -f Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:16:36 +0200 From: Hanspeter Roth To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050603181636.GA54906@gicco.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: route metric X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 18:16:42 -0000 Hello, I thought it is possible to have routes to the same destination but with a different metric. But I can't find how to set the metric in the route manpage. How is a metric for a route set? -Hanspeter From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 19:13:35 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B3316A41F for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 19:13:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F19143D8D for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 19:13:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j53JDQYe042362 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 22:13:26 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua ([82.193.96.10]) by localhost (rocky.ipnet [82.193.96.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 86813-11 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 22:13:26 +0300 (EEST) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j53JDQF2042359 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 22:13:26 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.3/8.13.3) id j53JDpfV054212 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 22:13:51 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 22:13:51 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050603191351.GA54164@ip.net.ua> References: <20050603181636.GA54906@gicco.homeip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050603181636.GA54906@gicco.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ip.net.ua Subject: Re: route metric X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 19:13:36 -0000 --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 08:16:36PM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I thought it is possible to have routes to the same destination but > with a different metric. But I can't find how to set the metric in > the route manpage. > How is a metric for a route set? >=20 We don't support that at the moment. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCoKvvqRfpzJluFF4RAizCAKCGikbmX0DR8qC0S5OsaQWBrmkaPACbBhbr oPMBVCxC8YWvqM3l+TIMrow= =RsXE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HcAYCG3uE/tztfnV-- From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 19:54:43 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0C316A41C; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 19:54:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from omestre@freeshell.org) Received: from seville.procergs.com.br (seville.procergs.com.br [200.198.128.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3354E43D48; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 19:54:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from omestre@freeshell.org) Received: from pro-pae-5513.procergs.rs.gov.br (unknown [172.28.5.20]) by seville.procergs.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A50716FF615E; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:54:41 -0300 (BRST) Received: by pro-pae-5513.procergs.rs.gov.br (Postfix, from userid 100) id E79D4468EE; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:52:56 -0300 (BRT) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:52:56 -0300 From: OMestre To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050603195256.GE2065@pro-pae-5513.procergs.reders> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: Subject: USB CDC ACM X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 19:54:43 -0000 Hello all... Has anyone a mobile phone (motorola v300?), in the FreeBSD environment? There are some apps like: kmobiletools, kandy, moto4lin, that just need a modem interface to contact to the cell phone and sync (contacts, meetings...). But i don't know if FreeBSD have these 'specs' implemented (USB CDC ACM). Maybe the umodem can handle the mobiles's modem. So, i just want to know if someone have a mobile phone working, and with which configurations? Thanks. -- omestre@freeshell.org http://omestre.freeshell.org ----------------------------------------------------- "I believe i need every ship we have if we're going to survive this attack. Then why did you allow the Nebuchadnezzar to leave"? (Commander Lock) "Because i believe our survival dependes on more than how many ships we have". (Councillor Hamann) - Matrix Reloaded - ----------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 20:21:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C497D16A41C; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:21:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael@gargantuan.com) Received: from phoenix.gargantuan.com (srv01.lak.lwxdatacom.net [24.73.171.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4981F43D48; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:21:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michael@gargantuan.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.gargantuan.com [127.0.0.1]) by spamassassin-injector (Postfix) with SMTP id DF7CB212; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:21:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by phoenix.gargantuan.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D72031F4; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:21:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:21:09 -0400 From: "Michael W. Oliver" To: Ruslan Ermilov Message-ID: <20050603202109.GA22098@gargantuan.com> Mail-Followup-To: Ruslan Ermilov , freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <20050603181636.GA54906@gicco.homeip.net> <20050603191351.GA54164@ip.net.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050603191351.GA54164@ip.net.ua> X-WWW-URL: http://michael.gargantuan.com X-GPG-PGP-Public-Key: http://michael.gargantuan.com/gnupg/pubkey.asc X-GPG-PGP-Fingerprint: 2694 0179 AE3F BFAE 0916 0BF5 B16B FBAB C5FA A3C9 X-Home-Phone: +1-863-816-8091 X-Mobile-Phone: +1-863-738-2334 X-Mailing-Address0: 8008 Apache Lane X-Mailing-Address1: Lakeland, FL X-Mailing-Address2: 33810-2172 X-Mailing-Address3: United States of America X-Guide-Questions: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html X-Guide-Netiquette: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Spam-DCC: dcc.uncw.edu: phoenix.gargantuan.com 1201; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on phoenix.gargantuan.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.0.3 X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 0 times. Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: route metric X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 20:21:25 -0000 --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2005-06-03T22:13:51+0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 08:16:36PM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote: >> Hello, >> I thought it is possible to have routes to the same destination but >> with a different metric. But I can't find how to set the metric in >> the route manpage. >> How is a metric for a route set? > We don't support that at the moment. yeah, ru is right, unfortunately. may i ask what you are trying to accomplish? if you have a dynamic routing protocol that you can tap into, zebra can manage same-prefix routes of multiple administrative distances (not same as metric) and keep the best route in the RIB for you at all times. there used to be patches floating around for 4.x that would allow a kind of metric, but IIRC you couldn't use two (or more) same-metric routes for per-packet balancing, rather the metric would be degraded for each packet that was forwarded to a particular destination (it's been a while since I looked, so I may be all wet on this). it would be nice to have a feature like this, where you could have multiple same-prefix, same-metric routes in a FIB, and the packets would be balanced to the next hop, either on a per-flow or per-packet basis. i have seen a lot of answers to this request over the years along the lines of ``FreeBSD isn't a router'', which is sad since it does perform the task of packet routing exceedingly well, and a heck of a lot cheaper than vendor C. all of the usual reasons that OSS is better apply here, too. who wouldn't like SSH on all of their routers without paying $$$ for a crypto image?!? mind you, i am not complaining here, just making an observation. if this drives someone to prove me wrong, (many others and) i would be all the happier! --=20 Mike Oliver [see complete headers for contact information] --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCoLu1sWv7q8X6o8kRAmouAJ9VCml3c+1PtsxsiPuO9zZBceAfBACfTLp+ BiMUaFc6slTFYseHkPr1/xE= =JTHY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8-- From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 20:36:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFC3C16A41C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:36:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sascha@rincewind.c4inet.net) Received: from rincewind.c4inet.net (rincewind.c4inet.net [193.120.144.209]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D63F43D1F for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:36:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sascha@rincewind.c4inet.net) Received: (qmail 56729 invoked by uid 1000); 3 Jun 2005 20:36:02 -0000 Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:36:02 +0100 From: Sascha Luck To: net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050603203602.GA56687@saoirse.c4inet.net> References: <54849.80.203.112.249.1113746502.squirrel@webmail.stabbursmoen.no> <20050418204801.09BF5812D@joshua.stabbursmoen.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050418204801.09BF5812D@joshua.stabbursmoen.no> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p1 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: Subject: Re: SOVLED: Problems with CARP, VLANs and em driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 20:36:07 -0000 On Mon, Apr 18, 2005 at 10:47:06PM +0200, eivind@stabbursmoen.no wrote: > The vlan(4) device is not yet officially supported for carp(4). It works for > NICs which talks to mii, but cards such as em(4) could get problems. is this still the current status for 5.4 and CURRENT and if yes, is a patch available for the 5.4R version of if_em.c? cheers, s. From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 20:44:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C898516A41C; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:44:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sferreira@comcast.net) Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net (sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B92C43D49; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:44:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sferreira@comcast.net) Received: from 204.127.205.150 ([204.127.205.150]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP id <2005060320442201100moq08e>; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:44:22 +0000 Received: from [65.213.86.84] by 204.127.205.150; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 20:44:21 +0000 From: sferreira@comcast.net To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 20:44:21 +0000 Message-Id: <060320052044.5672.42A0C125000B8BF30000162822007511500E9D070A9D9D0A009C@comcast.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Dec 17 2004) X-Authenticated-Sender: c2ZlcnJlaXJhQGNvbWNhc3QubmV0 Cc: Subject: FREEBSD between two trunks X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 20:44:23 -0000 I'm trying to setup DUMMYNET to emulate long delays, such as those encountered in satellite links. The problem is that I have to place my freebsd host between two trunks passing vlans (2,3,4,5,6). So the setup is: cisco swictch trunks vlan 2,3,4,5,6 <-> freebsd <--> cisco switch trunks vlan 2,3,4,5,6 All the documents I could find related to this subject matter has the freebsd as an endpoint and not connecting two trunks. Also the freebsd has to be an invisible hop on the network, so it can not route this traffic. I had setup my freebsd in bridge mode but I could not get this setup to work. From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 21:00:37 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0B216A41C; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:00:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from bigwoop.vicor-nb.com (bigwoop.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249BD43D1D; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:00:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from [208.206.78.97] (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by bigwoop.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64AFA7A439; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:00:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42A0C4F4.8010009@elischer.org> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 14:00:36 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050423 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Thompson References: <20050603020140.GA22870@heff.fud.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <20050603020140.GA22870@heff.fud.org.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xxconfig for if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 21:00:37 -0000 what does if_bridge give you that cannot be achieved with ng_bridge+ng_eiface? Well, I guess it has some spanning tree algorythm in it, but it might be as easy to put that in ng_bridge and a lot more flexible, Andrew Thompson wrote: >Hi, > > >The if_bridge code that will soon be committed can be configured using >either brconfig or ifconfig. > >http://people.freebsd.org/~thompsa/ > >Only one tool will be committed and I would like to get opinions on >which one ppl prefer > >brconfig > - new util to /sbin > + same as NetBSD/OpenBSD > - would require new rc.d script and rc.conf keywords > >ifconfig (patched for if_bridge) > + one tool to rule them all > + seamless with rc.conf, ifconfig_bridge0="..." > - diverges from the other BSDs > > >Andrew >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 21:08:46 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD4B16A41C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:08:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC0443D4C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:08:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from localhost (rocky.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.2]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j53L8iHM049421 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 00:08:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua ([82.193.96.10]) by localhost (rocky.ipnet [82.193.96.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 90836-12 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 00:08:44 +0300 (EEST) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j53L8h0C049418 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 00:08:43 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.3/8.13.3) id j53L99wj045345 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 00:09:09 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 00:09:09 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050603210909.GA36509@ip.net.ua> References: <20050603181636.GA54906@gicco.homeip.net> <20050603191351.GA54164@ip.net.ua> <20050603202109.GA22098@gargantuan.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050603202109.GA22098@gargantuan.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at ip.net.ua Subject: Re: route metric X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 21:08:47 -0000 --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 04:21:09PM -0400, Michael W. Oliver wrote: > it would be nice to have a feature like this, where you could have > multiple same-prefix, same-metric routes in a FIB, and the packets would > be balanced to the next hop, either on a per-flow or per-packet basis. >=20 This is already possible though not through the routing but with the aid of ipfw(8). Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCoMb0qRfpzJluFF4RAgWVAJwKSEm1AscF7saHcZOM6Jg2LuRjDQCdF2Ob RZdftjZ1TnSADWq8hMubhzE= =/z/4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+-- From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 21:14:02 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10E0E16A41C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:14:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thompsa@fud.org.nz) Received: from heff.fud.org.nz (60-234-149-201.bitstream.orcon.net.nz [60.234.149.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A354E43D49 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:14:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thompsa@fud.org.nz) Received: from thompsa by heff.fud.org.nz with local (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1DeJUO-0006y6-IR; Sat, 04 Jun 2005 09:14:00 +1200 Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 09:14:00 +1200 From: Andrew Thompson To: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <20050603211400.GA26676@heff.fud.org.nz> References: <20050603020140.GA22870@heff.fud.org.nz> <42A0C4F4.8010009@elischer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42A0C4F4.8010009@elischer.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: Andrew Thompson Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xxconfig for if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 21:14:02 -0000 On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 02:00:36PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > what does if_bridge give you that cannot be achieved with > ng_bridge+ng_eiface? > Well, I guess it has some spanning tree algorythm in it, but it might be > as easy to put > that in ng_bridge and a lot more flexible, > We had this same discussion a year ago. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-April/thread.html#25886 Andrew From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 21:20:09 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4200416A41C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:20:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from schluting@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF4D43D53 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:20:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from schluting@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 12so1236044nzp for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 14:19:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nx2eNV6aiHT8axLht4JZAUBmiGp5x0rfpbk/dZz8/22ugwwC5G8bf3JQgQ6/BM9MriABQqvNcL7dXhSPKD77Tlr0H7+FEA6UYYgv/6AgHWmUHPUH5lq+PD/DUPBAd+Tth2SSKzh96dlOPX6plmMeotORtMdJwwFoXjbVn3fLRoo= Received: by 10.36.220.53 with SMTP id s53mr1581495nzg; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 13:53:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.9.4 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 13:53:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <83946540050603135324d6b8cd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 13:53:06 -0700 From: Charlie Schluting To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050603202109.GA22098@gargantuan.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20050603181636.GA54906@gicco.homeip.net> <20050603191351.GA54164@ip.net.ua> <20050603202109.GA22098@gargantuan.com> Subject: Re: route metric X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Charlie Schluting List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 21:20:09 -0000 > it would be nice to have a feature like this, where you could have > multiple same-prefix, same-metric routes in a FIB, and the packets would > be balanced to the next hop, either on a per-flow or per-packet basis. > i have seen a lot of answers to this request over the years along the > lines of ``FreeBSD isn't a router'', which is sad since it does perform > the task of packet routing exceedingly well, and a heck of a lot cheaper > than vendor C. all of the usual reasons that OSS is better apply here, > too. who wouldn't like SSH on all of their routers without paying $$$ > for a crypto image?!? >=20 It does do many things well enough, but have you tried to use dot1q on 5.x with an Intel chip? Those bugs are reason #1. You can't have a production router that reboot when you run tcpdump or traceroute :) Reason #2 is latency. Vendor C put a lot of time and money into features like CEF that take advantage of hardware packet forwarding. A purely software-based device simply can't keep up with large flows, and definitely introduces latency--especially when filtering. My $0.02 :) -Charlie From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 21:40:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA2816A41C; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:40:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) Received: from obelix.sunrise.ch (mailrelay3.sunrise.ch [194.158.229.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDF443D48; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:40:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) Received: from gicco.homeip.net (pop-zh-18-1-dialup-30.freesurf.ch [194.230.219.30]) by obelix.sunrise.ch (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j53Le3aY004238; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:40:03 +0200 Received: from gicco.here (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gicco.homeip.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j53LdvX9001943; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:39:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) Received: (from idefix@localhost) by gicco.here (8.13.1/8.12.11/Submit) id j53LdvAi001942; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:39:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hampi@rootshell.be) X-Authentication-Warning: gicco.here: idefix set sender to hampi@rootshell.be using -f Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:39:57 +0200 From: Hanspeter Roth To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050603213957.GA1821@gicco.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Ruslan Ermilov References: <20050603181636.GA54906@gicco.homeip.net> <20050603191351.GA54164@ip.net.ua> <20050603202109.GA22098@gargantuan.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050603202109.GA22098@gargantuan.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: route metric X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 21:40:06 -0000 On Jun 03 at 16:21, Michael W. Oliver spoke: > On 2005-06-03T22:13:51+0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 08:16:36PM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote: > >> Hello, > > >> I thought it is possible to have routes to the same destination but > >> with a different metric. But I can't find how to set the metric in > >> the route manpage. > >> How is a metric for a route set? > > > We don't support that at the moment. > > yeah, ru is right, unfortunately. may i ask what you are trying to > accomplish? if you have a dynamic routing protocol that you can tap > into, zebra can manage same-prefix routes of multiple administrative > distances (not same as metric) and keep the best route in the RIB for > you at all times. I'm still not acquainted with zebra. I have a host that is connected via LAN and ISDN to the internet. I want to route everything via LAN as long as the connection works and have ISDN for a backup path. So I thought to set two default routes with different metrics. -Hanspeter From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 21:41:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4EC16A41F; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:41:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from bigwoop.vicor-nb.com (bigwoop.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F1743D55; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:41:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from [208.206.78.97] (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by bigwoop.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148087A423; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 14:41:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42A0CE82.5040306@elischer.org> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 14:41:22 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050423 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Thompson References: <20050603020140.GA22870@heff.fud.org.nz> <42A0C4F4.8010009@elischer.org> <20050603211400.GA26676@heff.fud.org.nz> In-Reply-To: <20050603211400.GA26676@heff.fud.org.nz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xxconfig for if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 21:41:23 -0000 Andrew Thompson wrote: >On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 02:00:36PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > >>what does if_bridge give you that cannot be achieved with >>ng_bridge+ng_eiface? >>Well, I guess it has some spanning tree algorythm in it, but it might be >>as easy to put >>that in ng_bridge and a lot more flexible, >> >> >> > >We had this same discussion a year ago. > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-April/thread.html#25886 > > and I still don't see why it is better to import Yet another bridge module rather than adding it to the 2 we already have. You can do things with ng_bridge that you can't do with if_bridge.. for example bridge together 3 remote sites connected by ipsec tunnels. > >Andrew > > From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 22:16:06 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6468916A41C for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 22:16:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lerik@nolink.net) Received: from electra.nolink.net (electra.nolink.net [195.139.204.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA17143D48 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 22:16:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lerik@nolink.net) Received: (qmail 37135 invoked by uid 1000); 3 Jun 2005 22:16:01 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Jun 2005 22:16:01 -0000 Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 00:16:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Lars Erik Gullerud To: Charlie Schluting In-Reply-To: <83946540050603135324d6b8cd@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20050603235004.S25740@electra.nolink.net> References: <20050603181636.GA54906@gicco.homeip.net> <20050603191351.GA54164@ip.net.ua> <20050603202109.GA22098@gargantuan.com> <83946540050603135324d6b8cd@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: route metric X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 22:16:06 -0000 On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Charlie Schluting wrote: > Reason #2 is latency. Vendor C put a lot of time and money into > features like CEF that take advantage of hardware packet forwarding. A > purely software-based device simply can't keep up with large flows, > and definitely introduces latency--especially when filtering. Just to set things straight, CEF != hardware packet forwarding. CEF is a forwarding/FIB-lookup algorithm that speeds up the packet forwarding by using a process to generate the complete FIB in a 256-way trie structure in memory from the routes in the RIB. This means the router can forward the packet a lot faster directly in the interrupt context when the packet is received on the ingress interface, as the trie lookup is a lot more efficient & requires fewer steps than older methods like building a route-cache based on recent lookups (usually stored in a radix tree). Case in point, the Cisco 7200, still one of the most widely deployed access/aggregation routers out there (especialy among small/medium-sized ISPs), is a pure CPU-based central forwarding architecture based on MIPS CPUs and PCI buses, which uses CEF central forwarding. Even many early 12000 GSR linecards merely distributed this function down to individual CPUs placed on the linecards (dCEF), they did not have hardware forwarding using ASICs/FPGAs. Yes, newer router models from all major vendors usually rely on ASIC-assisted forwarding, and increasingly more dataplane/controlplane separation but this has nothing to do with CEF as such. BTW, "large flows" are actually a lot easier to handle in CPU-based forwarding systems, as the limitation then usually lies in the available bus bandwidth. It's high packet rates that will kill these architectures quickly, due to the number of interrupts that need to be serviced and the number of individual FIB lookups this results in (even smaller routers handle large amounts of bandwidth if fed with large packet sizes and continuous flows). /leg From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 22:35:25 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBA416A41C; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 22:35:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp) Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp [202.249.10.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711E443D1F; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 22:35:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp) Received: from ocean.jinmei.org (unknown [2001:4f8:3:bb:780b:f29b:bfac:bc60]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3611C1521A; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 07:38:26 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 07:36:17 +0900 Message-ID: From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= To: "Li, Qing" In-Reply-To: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C010AF92D@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> References: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C010AF92D@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan. MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann Subject: Re: issue with route X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 22:35:25 -0000 >>>>> On Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:01:40 -0700, >>>>> "Li, Qing" said: >> Then please send me your final patch including proposed >> commit message for final review again. After that, when no >> more issues arise, you can go ahead and commit the change. >> >> Oh, BTW. Don't be afraid when you get brucified. Bruce' > Does anyone have a good .emacs that conforms to style(9) > that could share with me? > That might just save me a lot of pain from the > inevitable brucifixion. I believe the built-in "bsd" style should meet most of the style requirements (with GNU Emacs 21). Try (c-set-style "bsd") on your .[ch] buffers (and put it in the c-mode-common-hook if it works). The only hard part I can see with the bsd style is the "four-space indentation" rule for the 2nd level: ============================================================================= Indentation is an 8 character tab. Second level indents are four spaces. If you have to wrap a long statement, put the operator at the end of the line. while (cnt < 20 && this_variable_name_is_too_long && ep != NULL) z = a + really + long + statement + that + needs + two + lines + gets + indented + four + spaces + on + the + second + and + subsequent + lines; ============================================================================= The bsd style would indent these lines as follows: ============================================================================= while (cnt < 20 && this_variable_name_is_too_long && ep != NULL) z = a + really + long + statement + that + needs + two + lines + gets + indented + four + spaces + on + the + second + and + subsequent + lines; ============================================================================= Are you perhaps asking for .emacs setting which conforms to this (the four-space) style? JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 22:40:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19B916A41C; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 22:40:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from whisker.bluecoat.com (whisker.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7766543D4C; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 22:40:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from bcs-mail.bluecoat.com (bcs-mail.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.69]) by whisker.bluecoat.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j53MeWgo023292; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:40:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bcs-mail3.bluecoat.com ([10.2.2.59]) by bcs-mail.bluecoat.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5329); Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:40:14 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6603.0 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:40:14 -0700 Message-ID: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C012A51E0@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: issue with route Thread-Index: AcVojH9dR3AHxEmPQ826hch6fhIPwgAADOUQ From: "Li, Qing" To: "JINMEI Tatuya / ????" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jun 2005 22:40:14.0445 (UTC) FILETIME=[355641D0:01C5688D] X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 216.52.23.28 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann Subject: RE: issue with route X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 22:40:34 -0000 >=20 > The only hard part I can see with the bsd style is the=20 > "four-space indentation" rule for the 2nd level: >=20 Exactly. >=20 >=20 > Are you perhaps asking for .emacs setting which conforms to this (the > four-space) style? >=20 Yes, do you have one ? -- Qing From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 3 23:56:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C84916A41F for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:56:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23C743D48 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 23:56:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin01-en2 [10.13.10.146]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout09/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id j53Nu1Q8008872; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:56:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.1.153] (nfw2.codefab.com [199.103.21.225] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin01/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id j53NtsiM002883; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 16:55:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C012A51E0@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> References: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C012A51E0@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v730) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 19:55:54 -0400 To: "Li, Qing" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.730) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: issue with route X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 23:56:10 -0000 On Jun 3, 2005, at 6:40 PM, Li, Qing wrote: >> Are you perhaps asking for .emacs setting which conforms to this (the >> four-space) style? > > Yes, do you have one ? For most purposes, if you set c-basic-offset to 4, this will also work fine with classic BSD-style code using 8-chars as the initial offset, since c-mode will go from that indent if the code you are modifying is using it. You still want tab-width set to 8, so consider placing something like this in your .emacs: ;; Define C indenting style (defconst my-c-style '((c-basic-offset . 4) (c-tab-always-indent . t) ; [ ...snip... ] (c-echo-syntactic-information-p . f) ; change to "t" if you want to see indent info ) "Qing's C programmming style :-)") ;; Customizations for both c-mode and c++-mode (defun my-c-mode-common-hook () (c-set-style "bsd") (c-add-style "PERSONAL" my-c-style t) (setq tab-width 8 indent-tabs-mode nil) ) (add-hook 'c-mode-common-hook 'my-c-mode-common-hook) ...and see whether that comes closer to what you want. Hmm, this may not add additional indentation for the "two + lines + gets..." case. So also try putting this: (c-offsets-alist . ((arglist-close . c- lineup-arglist) (statement-cont . ++))) ...into the my-c-style block as well, this seems to work. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 00:16:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D608616A41C; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 00:16:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp) Received: from shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp [202.249.10.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5819A43D49; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 00:16:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp) Received: from ocean.jinmei.org (unknown [2001:4f8:3:bb:780b:f29b:bfac:bc60]) by shuttle.wide.toshiba.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC83215225; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 09:19:38 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 09:17:29 +0900 Message-ID: From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= To: "Li, Qing" In-Reply-To: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C012A51E0@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> References: <48D44BB27BDE3840BDF18E59CB169A5C012A51E0@bcs-mail3.internal.cacheflow.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) Emacs/21.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) Organization: Research & Development Center, Toshiba Corp., Kawasaki, Japan. MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann Subject: Re: issue with route X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 00:16:35 -0000 (I'm afraid we're going to an off-topic. If this message needs a response, we should perhaps do that off-list.) >>>>> On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:40:14 -0700, >>>>> "Li, Qing" said: >> Are you perhaps asking for .emacs setting which conforms to this (the >> four-space) style? > Yes, do you have one ? I'm using this one. JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp (add-hook 'c-mode-common-hook (function (lambda () (c-set-style "bsd") (c-set-offset 'statement 'netbsd-knf-lineup-statement) (c-set-offset 'arglist-intro 'netbsd-knf-lineup-arglist) (c-set-offset 'arglist-cont 'netbsd-knf-lineup-arglist) (c-set-offset 'arglist-cont-nonempty 'netbsd-knf-lineup-arglist) ...;;(other personal settings) ))) (defun netbsd-knf-lineup-arglist (langelem) (let ((syntax (car (c-guess-basic-syntax))) (langelem-col (c-langelem-col langelem t)) (head) ) (save-excursion (while (memq (car syntax) '(arglist-cont-nonempty statement-cont arglist-intro arglist-cont)) (goto-char (cdr syntax)) (setq syntax (car (c-guess-basic-syntax)))) (if (eq (car syntax) 'statement) (goto-char (netbsd-knf-statement-head))) (beginning-of-line) (skip-chars-forward " \t") (+ (- (current-column) langelem-col) (/ c-basic-offset 2))))) (defun netbsd-knf-statement-head () (let ((cp (point))) (save-excursion (backward-up-list 1) (cond ((netbsd-knf-after-for-loop-p (point)) (beginning-of-line) (skip-chars-forward " \t") (point)) (t cp))))) (defun netbsd-knf-lineup-statement (langelem) (let ((syntax (car (c-guess-basic-syntax)))) (cond ((and (cdr syntax) ;to handle (comment-intro) (statement . xx) (netbsd-knf-after-for-loop-p (cdr syntax))) (save-excursion (goto-char (cdr syntax)) (beginning-of-line) (skip-chars-forward " \t") (+ (- (current-column) (c-langelem-col langelem t)) (/ c-basic-offset 2)))) (t 0)))) (defun netbsd-knf-after-for-loop-p (pos) "True if POS is just after `for ('" (save-excursion (goto-char pos) (condition-case () (progn (backward-word 1) (looking-at "\\bfor (")) (beginning-of-buffer nil)))) From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 00:45:45 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C83316A41C for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 00:45:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from calloatti@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7DEE43D54 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 00:45:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from calloatti@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so922476wri for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 17:45:44 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=h1tMK+mvyXJ99qP83KA4QM0AbefMT9TNoEFr5d9L6MLZfM7BPqLxr6yua4xHgSNi5uN7lP1xjGiz2y4lCc7osZyq6zO3e6jwHpJoI9eVyeCwrK7KmzM/tNjXhxEEF/1eMvauOKksuaacnRckOecZlrlc9CdQzoil0sdsVkNzdos= Received: by 10.54.34.77 with SMTP id h77mr1641888wrh; Fri, 03 Jun 2005 17:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.57.15 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jun 2005 17:45:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1b6c15ea0506031745264ad59@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 21:45:44 -0300 From: Carlos Alloatti To: "sferreira@comcast.net" In-Reply-To: <060320052044.5672.42A0C125000B8BF30000162822007511500E9D070A9D9D0A009C@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <060320052044.5672.42A0C125000B8BF30000162822007511500E9D070A9D9D0A009C@comcast.net> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FREEBSD between two trunks X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Carlos Alloatti List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 00:45:45 -0000 On 6/3/05, sferreira@comcast.net wrote: > I'm trying to setup DUMMYNET to emulate long delays, such as those encoun= tered in satellite links. The problem is that I have to place my freebsd ho= st between two trunks passing vlans (2,3,4,5,6). >=20 > So the setup is: >=20 > cisco swictch trunks vlan 2,3,4,5,6 <-> freebsd <--> cisco switch trunks = vlan 2,3,4,5,6 >=20 >=20 > All the documents I could find related to this subject matter has the fr= eebsd as an endpoint and not connecting two trunks. Also the freebsd has t= o be an invisible hop on the network, so it can not route this traffic. I = had setup my freebsd in bridge mode but I could not get this setup to work. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 Check my post: http://groups.google.com.ar/group/mailing.freebsd.isp/browse_thread/thread/= 13778e3c6f5eafe9/37f0fcaa0b1cb34a?q=3Dbest+sollution+(and+also+simple)+to+g= uarantee+a+bandwidth&rnum=3D2&hl=3Des#37f0fcaa0b1cb34a It details how to setup a Bridge with ipfw and dummynet for bandwitdh control, just change the queue rules, it should work. --=20 Carlos Alloatti calloatti_at_gmail.com From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 00:52:16 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEFF16A41C; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 00:52:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91FA43D1F; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 00:52:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from p54A3CE46.dip.t-dialin.net [84.163.206.70] (helo=donor.laier.local) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML21M-1DeMtY48fO-0001td; Sat, 04 Jun 2005 02:52:12 +0200 From: Max Laier To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 02:52:02 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20050603020140.GA22870@heff.fud.org.nz> <20050603211400.GA26676@heff.fud.org.nz> <42A0CE82.5040306@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <42A0CE82.5040306@elischer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart25406294.dXI2uzbUU8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200506040252.09866.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:61c499deaeeba3ba5be80f48ecc83056 Cc: Julian Elischer , Andrew Thompson Subject: Re: xxconfig for if_bridge X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 00:52:16 -0000 --nextPart25406294.dXI2uzbUU8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 03 June 2005 23:41, Julian Elischer wrote: > Andrew Thompson wrote: > >On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 02:00:36PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > >>what does if_bridge give you that cannot be achieved with > >>ng_bridge+ng_eiface? > >>Well, I guess it has some spanning tree algorythm in it, but it might be > >>as easy to put > >>that in ng_bridge and a lot more flexible, > > > >We had this same discussion a year ago. > > > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-April/thread.htm= l# > >25886 > > and I still don't see why it is better to import Yet another bridge > module rather > than adding it to the 2 we already have. In the long run (by 7.0 if things go as planed) the current bridge will be= =20 removed. The current bridge.c implementation has some issues and isn't=20 really actively maintained, while if_bridge is in Net- and OpenBSD and henc= e=20 we get more from it. You are welcome, of course, to teach ng_bridge about STP and whatnot. I ju= st=20 wonder why that hasn't happened by now? > You can do things with ng_bridge that you can't do with if_bridge.. And vice versa ... your point being? > for example bridge together 3 remote sites connected by ipsec tunnels. for example do proper firewalling on the bridge (without having to push the= =20 traffic through a gazillion netgraph nodes, which isn't all that great for= =20 performace). =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart25406294.dXI2uzbUU8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCoPs5XyyEoT62BG0RAqPRAJ9BEn4FasdYkzZTmxulf7a7+TfsvACfWkPp jsBGfjS49qjUoa1zXx7HTdk= =eApE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart25406294.dXI2uzbUU8-- From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 04:11:20 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4CA16A41C for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 04:11:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sferreira@comcast.net) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16C4B43D54 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 04:11:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sferreira@comcast.net) Received: from 204.127.205.147 ([204.127.205.147]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with SMTP id <2005060404111801200107eie>; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 04:11:19 +0000 Received: from [68.38.192.114] by 204.127.205.147; Sat, 04 Jun 2005 04:11:18 +0000 From: sferreira@comcast.net To: Carlos Alloatti Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 04:11:18 +0000 Message-Id: <060420050411.13407.42A129E6000B619D0000345F22007621940E9D070A9D9D0A009C@comcast.net> X-Mailer: AT&T Message Center Version 1 (Dec 17 2004) X-Authenticated-Sender: c2ZlcnJlaXJhQGNvbWNhc3QubmV0 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FREEBSD between two trunks X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 04:11:20 -0000 If I setup a bridge will freebsd pass 802.1q packets between two trunks ? Sincerely, Steve Ferreira > On 6/3/05, sferreira@comcast.net wrote: > > I'm trying to setup DUMMYNET to emulate long delays, such as those encountered > in satellite links. The problem is that I have to place my freebsd host between > two trunks passing vlans (2,3,4,5,6). > > > > So the setup is: > > > > cisco swictch trunks vlan 2,3,4,5,6 <-> freebsd <--> cisco switch trunks vlan > 2,3,4,5,6 > > > > > > All the documents I could find related to this subject matter has the freebsd > as an endpoint and not connecting two trunks. Also the freebsd has to be an > invisible hop on the network, so it can not route this traffic. I had setup my > freebsd in bridge mode but I could not get this setup to work. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > Check my post: > > http://groups.google.com.ar/group/mailing.freebsd.isp/browse_thread/thread/13778 > e3c6f5eafe9/37f0fcaa0b1cb34a?q=best+sollution+(and+also+simple)+to+guarantee+a+b > andwidth&rnum=2&hl=es#37f0fcaa0b1cb34a > > It details how to setup a Bridge with ipfw and dummynet for bandwitdh > control, just change the queue rules, it should work. > -- > Carlos Alloatti > calloatti_at_gmail.com From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 10:57:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6A616A41C for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 10:57:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dionch@freemail.gr) Received: from smtp.freemail.gr (smtp.freemail.gr [213.239.180.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29B443D49 for ; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 10:57:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dionch@freemail.gr) Received: by smtp.freemail.gr (Postfix, from userid 101) id B134ABC096; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:57:38 +0300 (EEST) Received: from R3B (unknown [62.38.169.49])by smtp.freemail.gr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4F4BC094; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:57:36 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <003901c568f4$09ad52f0$0100000a@R3B> From: "Chris Dionissopoulos" To: References: <060420050411.13407.42A129E6000B619D0000345F22007621940E9D070A9D9D0A009C@comcast.net> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:56:14 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-7"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FREEBSD between two trunks X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Chris Dionissopoulos List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 10:57:41 -0000 Try to bridge your virtual (vlan) interfaces, but not any physical. i.e. physical nics: fxp0 , fxp1 vlans: vlanid = 2 , vlan0 in fxp0 , vlan1 in fxp1 vlanid = 3 , vlan2 in fxp0 , vlan3 in fxp1 vlanid = 4 , vlan4 in fxp0 , vlan5 in fxp1 vlanid = 5 , vlan6 in fxp0 , vlan7 in fxp1 vlanid = 6 , vlan8 in fxp0 , vlan9 in fxp1 net.link.ether.bridge.config=vlan0:2,vlan1:2,vlan2:3,vlan3:3,vlan4:4,vlan5:4,vlan6:5,vlan7:5,vlan8:6,vlan9:6 net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1 then make a proper ipfw config like Carlos describes in his post. Chris. > If I setup a bridge will freebsd pass 802.1q packets between two trunks ? > > Sincerely, > > > Steve Ferreira > > ____________________________________________________________________ http://www.freemail.gr - äùñåÜí õðçñåóßá çëåêôñïíéêïý ôá÷õäñïìåßïõ. http://www.freemail.gr - free email service for the Greek-speaking. From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 4 18:14:57 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58E416A420; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 18:14:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: from hydrogen.funkthat.com (gate.funkthat.com [69.17.45.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2619D43D48; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 18:14:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: from hydrogen.funkthat.com (localhost.funkthat.com [127.0.0.1]) by hydrogen.funkthat.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j54IEu9V000796; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 11:14:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmg@hydrogen.funkthat.com) Received: (from jmg@localhost) by hydrogen.funkthat.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j54IEt58000795; Sat, 4 Jun 2005 11:14:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmg) Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 11:14:55 -0700 From: John-Mark Gurney To: sferreira@comcast.net Message-ID: <20050604181455.GA730@funkthat.com> Mail-Followup-To: sferreira@comcast.net, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <060320052044.5672.42A0C125000B8BF30000162822007511500E9D070A9D9D0A009C@comcast.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <060320052044.5672.42A0C125000B8BF30000162822007511500E9D070A9D9D0A009C@comcast.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE i386 X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 EC EF F8 AE ED A7 31 96 7A 22 B3 D8 56 36 F4 X-Files: The truth is out there X-URL: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/ X-Resume: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/resume.html Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FREEBSD between two trunks X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: John-Mark Gurney List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 18:14:57 -0000 sferreira@comcast.net wrote this message on Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 20:44 +0000: > I'm trying to setup DUMMYNET to emulate long delays, such as those encountered in satellite links. The problem is that I have to place my freebsd host between two trunks passing vlans (2,3,4,5,6). > > So the setup is: > > cisco swictch trunks vlan 2,3,4,5,6 <-> freebsd <--> cisco switch trunks vlan 2,3,4,5,6 > > > All the documents I could find related to this subject matter has the freebsd as an endpoint and not connecting two trunks. Also the freebsd has to be an invisible hop on the network, so it can not route this traffic. I had setup my freebsd in bridge mode but I could not get this setup to work. You may need to increase your mtu to allow the full sized packets to pass through... or you could setup a vlan w/ and id that isn't used and let that adjust the mtu for you.. -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."