From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 05:52:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C24616A4DD for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 05:52:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.ru (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02EDF43D53 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 05:52:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from [192.168.2.26] (helo=sysadm.stc) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1GEgEN-0008fL-KP for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 09:52:19 +0400 Received: from localhost.stc ([127.0.0.1] helo=sysadm.stc) by sysadm.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GEgEd-0007Gd-VO for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 09:52:36 +0400 Received: (from igorr@localhost) by sysadm.stc (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k7K5qZnb027938 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 09:52:35 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from igorr) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 09:52:35 +0400 From: Igor Robul To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060820055235.GA27919@sysadm.stc> References: <8D08DDB6-6AC1-45B6-B2CE-08782F54968A@stromnet.org> <884C01BC-3E97-46EC-AA8B-E70C3931F3A4@stromnet.org> <36895211-2796-4213-B336-6279AB3AC3CB@stromnet.org> <20060713132357.Y61840@fledge.watson.org> <44B7EA39.4060509@quip.cz> <6.2.3.4.0.20060716185019.12a29240@64.7.153.2> <44BBAF52.9080007@quip.cz> <0B43BAB0-BBF0-4E2C-875D-6E1E00BAB1D4@stromnet.org> <44E722BB.8010807@quip.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44E722BB.8010807@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 05:52:22 -0000 On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 04:39:55PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > I upgraded to RELENG_6, changed all HW (whole servers and changed > Seagate HHDs to Samsung so every piece of HW is different from time of > my first post), but after one week I got the same error and system Just a try - have you changed cables too? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 05:59:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A9416A4DE for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 05:59:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fydernix@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6926E43D62 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 05:59:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fydernix@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so1144478wxd for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:59:44 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=nI1VTZ+sAbuHh1jHg2E2b9COZcn+fI7I54QRCafDcJyYv8tFbRnm8+ZXmObzQIvzMoyQEwYnDCMbmDCYM1+TkWd/ZnEwr14dTL8cl9MYiJfOh1x2ApJ5kdbKuE5eyXszigvp42iLPZid3uAoVlbiyfc2sxgkJQRT1GdUecrdivQ= Received: by 10.90.113.18 with SMTP id l18mr71654agc; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:58:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.118.4 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 22:58:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 01:58:10 -0400 From: "SigmaX asdf" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Gateway [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 05:59:50 -0000 For the archives: Found my problem. Te firewall_type option is case sensitive -- and "OPEN" is supposed to be lowercase. Cheerio, SigmaX On 7/28/06, SigmaX asdf wrote: > > I'm trying to setup a gateway/firewall on my network in a similar setup to > that shown in the in the handbook diagram at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-natd.html > . I've followed what I can figure out, adding the following to my > /etc/rc.conf > > gateway_enable="YES" > firewall_enable="YES" > firewall_type="OPEN" > natd_enabl="YES" > natd_interface="rl0" > > My understanding is that in FreeBSD 6 it's not necessary to recompile a > kernal with IPFIREWALL and IPDIVERT, but appropriate modules will be loaded > automatically. > > That said, the NAT and gateway stuff doesn't seem to be working properly, > leastwise not when I try to connect from my Ubuntu Linux client (See thread > here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=224843) > > What all am I supposed to do to setup this gateway? > > SigmaX > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 06:07:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F79116A4DA for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 06:07:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fydernix@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E6D43D49 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 06:07:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fydernix@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so1145533wxd for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 23:07:20 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=LS/X8EiHNdUQneKNPTQUWBEZOYNp5kCKzE82wsHhjPCsUS7/ux6suvbBnKr+dRcrZqOmIAPdb5BuJaO9mV4mgA1GNYxvpQ/Nq0SvsDJQUIGbXg3nZ0Ma+0LWfGDGLCw7KxwpnVYKDizYw6RtXXZIG/YBhcm95GJ3P+SXQlsrCUI= Received: by 10.90.71.12 with SMTP id t12mr72546aga; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 23:07:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.118.4 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 23:07:20 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:07:20 -0400 From: "SigmaX asdf" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Port forwarding with IPFW/NATD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 06:07:21 -0000 I've setup a firewall box with IPFW and NATD with what the handbook had to offer on the subject, and now would like to get traffic forwarded to behind my shmancy new firewall. Google is purely confusing me on this one. From what I understand I need to do one or more of the following: setup a divert rule for ipfw setup a fwd rule for ipfw setup a redirect_port rule for natd compile forwarding support into my kernel Somehow I doubt it's all of the above. What am I supposed to do to allow port forwarding? Thanx for any pointers, SigmaX > > # ipfw list > 00010 divert 8668 tcp from any to 10.0.0.2 dst-port 80 > 00050 divert 8668 ip4 from any to any via rl0 > 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > 00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > 00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > 65000 allow ip from any to any > 65535 deny ip from any to any > Semi-relevant rc.conf options: > > gateway_enable="YES" > firewall_enable="YES" > firewall_type="open" > natd_enable="YES" > natd_interface="rl0" > natd_flags="-dynamic -m -f /etc/natd.conf" > ipfw_enable="YES" > natd.conf: > > redirect_port tcp 10.0.0.2:80 80 > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 06:12:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A2816A4DF for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 06:12:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fydernix@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B4F43D49 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 06:12:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fydernix@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so1146194wxd for ; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 23:12:01 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=mp4NPkWE0o6FFZDiF4j+ks1m9M4zpPkUgOPQyhvzn1CbbiFw2fN66j3WAvyxm34Gp25a8Q71ueyGOv5PPlNG9riwxbZb+QCOrJsHAHhQlLAnBVj5GMHLAQ2AS6UxKkv2PBo464+h8yvgqbgGUrDPF6OKnLjz/RdBtECEkke08Zg= Received: by 10.90.105.19 with SMTP id d19mr1817agc; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 23:12:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.118.4 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Aug 2006 23:12:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 02:12:00 -0400 From: "SigmaX asdf" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Re: Port forwarding with IPFW/NATD [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 06:12:06 -0000 Spoke too soon; figured it out not a minute later. It seems to work if I remove the divert rule for my server (10.0.0.2) from ipfw, and leave the natd parameter. SigmaX On 8/20/06, SigmaX asdf wrote: > I've setup a firewall box with IPFW and NATD with what the handbook > had to offer on the subject, and now would like to get traffic > forwarded to behind my shmancy new firewall. > > Google is purely confusing me on this one. From what I understand I > need to do one or more of the following: > > setup a divert rule for ipfw > setup a fwd rule for ipfw > setup a redirect_port rule for natd > compile forwarding support into my kernel > > Somehow I doubt it's all of the above. What am I supposed to do to > allow port forwarding? > > Thanx for any pointers, > SigmaX > > > > > # ipfw list > > 00010 divert 8668 tcp from any to 10.0.0.2 dst-port 80 > > 00050 divert 8668 ip4 from any to any via rl0 > > 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > > 00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > > 00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > > 65000 allow ip from any to any > > 65535 deny ip from any to any > > > > Semi-relevant rc.conf options: > > > > > gateway_enable="YES" > > firewall_enable="YES" > > firewall_type="open" > > natd_enable="YES" > > natd_interface="rl0" > > natd_flags="-dynamic -m -f /etc/natd.conf" > > ipfw_enable="YES" > > > > natd.conf: > > > > > redirect_port tcp 10.0.0.2:80 80 > > > > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 08:01:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2568816A4E8 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 08:01:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx24.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACD4E43D45 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 08:01:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 21540 invoked by uid 399); 20 Aug 2006 08:01:01 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Aug 2006 08:01:01 -0000 Message-ID: <44E816BA.1070005@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 01:00:58 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060729) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: SigmaX asdf References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gateway [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 08:01:03 -0000 SigmaX asdf wrote: > For the archives: > > Found my problem. Te firewall_type option is case sensitive -- and "OPEN" > is supposed to be lowercase. I would find that very surprising, given that as far as I can see, everywhere that the firewall_type variable is parsed it's tested against [Oo][Pp][Ee][Nn]. Can you please verify that if the _only_ thing you change is that variable from "open" to "OPEN" that it doesn't work, and if so, can you please set rc_debug and rc_info to yes in /etc/rc.conf, reboot, and give us an idea where it's breaking? Thanks, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 08:16:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2AC16A4DA for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 08:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx24.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D05A43D49 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 08:16:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 5474 invoked by uid 399); 20 Aug 2006 08:16:23 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 20 Aug 2006 08:16:23 -0000 Message-ID: <44E81A55.30106@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 01:16:21 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060729) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tom Hummel References: <44E44316.3060900@gmail.com> <20060817133259.GA22730@xor.obsecurity.org> <44E477E5.5090003@gmail.com> <20060817150656.GA25235@xor.obsecurity.org> <44E4888E.8070100@gmail.com> <20060817170211.GA28242@xor.obsecurity.org> <44E4A70C.2080105@gmail.com> <20060817173200.GA29060@xor.obsecurity.org> <44E4B129.6060308@gmail.com> <20060817191620.GA33267@xor.obsecurity.org> <44E5AC4B.6020208@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <44E5AC4B.6020208@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make buildworld does nothing X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 08:16:26 -0000 Tom Hummel wrote: > alright, it was bash :( stupid shell. Um, sorry, let's not blame the shell for the BCK (between chair and keyboard) problem. Lots of us use bash as our everyday shell (for privileged and unprivileged users) without the kinds of problems you described. The first thing I do when I install a new freebsd machine is to change root's shell to /bin/sh, and copy over my customized .profile which either execs bash if it finds it, or sets up sh with my aliases, etc. If you'd like help figuring out where you went wrong, we'll be glad to help you, but let's not pretend that the shell is at fault. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 08:20:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF48916A4E0 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 08:20:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from home.quip.cz (grimm.quip.cz [213.220.192.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDCA43D4C for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 08:20:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (qwork.quip.test [192.168.1.2]) by home.quip.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F6057E5; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:20:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44E81B52.3020500@quip.cz> Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:20:34 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cs, cz, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Igor Robul References: <8D08DDB6-6AC1-45B6-B2CE-08782F54968A@stromnet.org> <884C01BC-3E97-46EC-AA8B-E70C3931F3A4@stromnet.org> <36895211-2796-4213-B336-6279AB3AC3CB@stromnet.org> <20060713132357.Y61840@fledge.watson.org> <44B7EA39.4060509@quip.cz> <6.2.3.4.0.20060716185019.12a29240@64.7.153.2> <44BBAF52.9080007@quip.cz> <0B43BAB0-BBF0-4E2C-875D-6E1E00BAB1D4@stromnet.org> <44E722BB.8010807@quip.cz> <20060820055235.GA27919@sysadm.stc> In-Reply-To: <20060820055235.GA27919@sysadm.stc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 08:20:40 -0000 Igor Robul wrote: > On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 04:39:55PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > >>I upgraded to RELENG_6, changed all HW (whole servers and changed >>Seagate HHDs to Samsung so every piece of HW is different from time of >>my first post), but after one week I got the same error and system > > Just a try - have you changed cables too? Do you mean different type of cables, or just another piece? I can't change cables by myself, servers are dedicated from provider, but as I can saw, they picked whole new machine from their HW storage and put new Samsung disk drives in. So these two last machines are brand new with new cables. (Probably with a same type of cables - all machines are ASUS RS120) Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 08:40:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C4216A4DA for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 08:40:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johniewong@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC00843D49 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 08:40:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from johniewong@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so1844282nfc for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 01:40:11 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=B4aCcaMG/HrjX4nnZbxRsKszRIIXGJ2WpCeLNp8Nqx2jwkiGuvZ+757SoOl5HYZoe2VadiEBY//Rht5VCiyYZfGn/AwJsPv9jr+PV2bVBi7VEThTjp1I4Zt+uglp3Hw90esqxOApHlx5ljOeh9LRpTpBCC3j3D0YsP06jVfc/6E= Received: by 10.49.93.13 with SMTP id v13mr6207588nfl; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 01:40:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.176.4 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 01:40:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 16:40:11 +0800 From: "Johnie Wong" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Fail to install the driver of the on-board LAN Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 08:40:13 -0000 Dear All, I am the user of FreeBSD 6.1. Recently, i buy a new server for my company which is a Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 (1.86GHz) with Intel D946GZIS mainboard, 2GB Consair DDR2 Ram, 3Ware 9500S-4LP, and 4X Seagate 250GB SATA II Harddrive. But when i install the on-board LAN card driver by activating the default fxp option, it is invisible. Here are my problems: 1. Is Intel Core 2 Duo is now supported by 6.1? 2. Is chipset 946 is now supported by 6.1? 3. Why the fxp option being invisible in sysinstall screen? I have searched around the Internet with google, but no answer. I hope the experts from her can solve my problems. Thank you very much. -- Cheers, Johnie Wong From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 12:39:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3CA16A4DF for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:39:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@chronos.org.uk) Received: from chronos.org.uk (chronos.org.uk [82.152.140.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EA343D76 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:39:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@chronos.org.uk) Received: from [2001:618:400:6f4e:204:75ff:fe75:1466] ([IPv6:2001:618:400:6f4e:204:75ff:fe75:1466]) (authenticated bits=0) by chronos.org.uk (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7KCcugk017252 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 13:38:56 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matt@chronos.org.uk) From: Matt Dawson To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 13:38:55 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> X-Face: Zrm9At!%e{M_#Po+[-\; RFQih#L0/\!^6f8JS_1Nz,8`(@bR%|T,c)3:o6my`.sy$Rt)'^)ec9cWp!MmeH^Gp|Afl)BkcH1GENCBqb&wZ$cdqN27uYfD=jU@1:vWXf|)LmuVKo?1wuS68KeDX&3,#wZP2$N1Ao!_'mZOws67 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_05,NO_RELAYS autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on central.local.chronos.org.uk X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/1692/Sun Aug 20 12:30:20 2006 on central.local.chronos.org.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:39:17 -0000 On Sunday 20 August 2006 13:00, freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org wrote: > Do you mean different type of cables, or just another piece? I can't > change cables by myself, servers are dedicated from provider, but as I > can saw, they picked whole new machine from their HW storage and put new > Samsung disk drives in. So these two last machines are brand new with > new cables. (Probably with a same type of cables - all machines are ASUS > RS120) I can confirm the same behaviour with a ULi M1689/Newcastle Athlon64 based system running 6.1-RELEASE-p3 (i386). ad6 just detaches without warning and it takes a reboot to bring it back. atacontrol reinit has no effect. Tried the following to resolve the problems: - Changed cables (both ad4 and ad6) - Changed SATA power to legacy - Moved the NIC and anything else from the shared PCI INT (thought I'd cracked it at this point as it was stable for a month, then it lost ad6 on a nightly dump) - Remade my gmirror array as an ar. Put it straight back to gmirror again when I found out what a pain it is to rebuild after ad6 disappears. Until I read this thread, I was convinced there was something flaky in my hardware/BIOS or WD's TLER. Now I'm not so sure. Hardware: $ pciconf -lv agp0@pci0:0:0: class=0x060000 card=0x50001458 chip=0x168910b9 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Acer Labs Incorporated (ALi)' class = bridge subclass = HOST-PCI pcib1@pci0:1:0: class=0x060400 card=0x00000000 chip=0x524610b9 rev=0x00 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Acer Labs Incorporated (ALi)' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI pcib2@pci0:2:0: class=0x060401 card=0x00000000 chip=0x524910b9 rev=0x00 hdr=0x01 vendor = 'Acer Labs Incorporated (ALi)' device = 'M5249 HyperTransport to PCI Bridge' class = bridge subclass = PCI-PCI isab0@pci0:3:0: class=0x060100 card=0x50011458 chip=0x156310b9 rev=0x70 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Acer Labs Incorporated (ALi)' device = 'ALI M1563 South Bridge with Hypertransport Support' class = bridge subclass = PCI-ISA none0@pci0:3:1: class=0x068000 card=0x50031458 chip=0x710110b9 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Acer Labs Incorporated (ALi)' device = 'ALI M7101 Power Management Controller' class = bridge atapci0@pci0:14:0: class=0x0101fa card=0x50021458 chip=0x522910b9 rev=0xc7 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Acer Labs Incorporated (ALi)' device = 'M1543 Southbridge EIDE Controller' class = mass storage subclass = ATA atapci1@pci0:14:1: class=0x01018f card=0xb0031458 chip=0x528910b9 rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Acer Labs Incorporated (ALi)' class = mass storage subclass = ATA ohci0@pci0:15:0: class=0x0c0310 card=0x50041458 chip=0x523710b9 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Acer Labs Incorporated (ALi)' device = 'M5237 OpenHCI 1.1 USB Controller' class = serial bus subclass = USB ohci1@pci0:15:1: class=0x0c0310 card=0x50041458 chip=0x523710b9 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Acer Labs Incorporated (ALi)' device = 'M5237 OpenHCI 1.1 USB Controller' class = serial bus subclass = USB ohci2@pci0:15:2: class=0x0c0310 card=0x50041458 chip=0x523710b9 rev=0x03 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Acer Labs Incorporated (ALi)' device = 'M5237 OpenHCI 1.1 USB Controller' class = serial bus subclass = USB ehci0@pci0:15:3: class=0x0c0320 card=0x50041458 chip=0x523910b9 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Acer Labs Incorporated (ALi)' device = 'USB 2.0 Enhanced Host Controller' class = serial bus subclass = USB hostb0@pci0:24:0: class=0x060000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x11001022 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)' device = 'Athlon 64 / Opteron HyperTransport Technology Configuration' class = bridge subclass = HOST-PCI hostb1@pci0:24:1: class=0x060000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x11011022 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)' device = 'Athlon 64 / Opteron Address Map' class = bridge subclass = HOST-PCI hostb2@pci0:24:2: class=0x060000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x11021022 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)' device = 'Athlon 64 / Opteron DRAM Controller' class = bridge subclass = HOST-PCI hostb3@pci0:24:3: class=0x060000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x11031022 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)' device = 'Athlon 64 / Opteron Miscellaneous Control' class = bridge subclass = HOST-PCI none1@pci1:0:0: class=0x030000 card=0x02071787 chip=0x51571002 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'ATI Technologies Inc' device = 'Radeon 7500 Series (RV200)' class = display subclass = VGA ahc0@pci2:5:0: class=0x010000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x81789004 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Adaptec Inc' device = 'AHA-2940U/UW/2940D Ultra/Ultra Wide/Dual SCSI Host Adapter' class = mass storage subclass = SCSI xl0@pci2:6:0: class=0x020000 card=0x00000000 chip=0x905010b7 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 vendor = '3COM Corp, Networking Division' device = '3C905-TX Fast Etherlink XL PCI 10/100' class = network subclass = ethernet fxp0@pci2:8:0: class=0x020000 card=0xb01e0e11 chip=0x12298086 rev=0x05 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intel Corporation' device = '82550/1/7/8/9 EtherExpress PRO/100(B) Ethernet Adapter' class = network subclass = ethernet $ gmirror list gm0 Geom name: gm0 State: COMPLETE Components: 2 Balance: round-robin Slice: 4096 Flags: NONE GenID: 0 SyncID: 3 ID: 2674318127 Providers: 1. Name: mirror/gm0 Mediasize: 164696555008 (153G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r8w8e10 Consumers: 1. Name: ad4 Mediasize: 164696555520 (153G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e1 State: ACTIVE Priority: 0 Flags: DIRTY GenID: 0 SyncID: 3 ID: 4037385812 2. Name: ad6 Mediasize: 164696555520 (153G) Sectorsize: 512 Mode: r1w1e1 State: ACTIVE Priority: 0 Flags: DIRTY GenID: 0 SyncID: 3 ID: 3245363724 Both drives are WD RE2s with TLER. -- Matt Dawson. matt@chronos.org.uk MTD15-RIPE OpenNIC M_D9 MD51-6BONE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 16:20:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0974616A4DD for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 16:20:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from core.byshenk.net (core.byshenk.net [62.58.73.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6C143D5E for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 16:20:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from core.byshenk.net (localhost.aoes.com [127.0.0.1]) by core.byshenk.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7KGKW3C050653; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:20:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from byshenknet@core.byshenk.net) Received: (from byshenknet@localhost) by core.byshenk.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k7KGKWbE050652; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:20:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from byshenknet) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:20:32 +0200 From: Greg Byshenk To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=failed version=3.1.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on core.byshenk.net Cc: Matt Dawson Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 16:20:53 -0000 On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 01:38:55PM +0100, Matt Dawson wrote: > On Sunday 20 August 2006 13:00, freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org wrote: > > Do you mean different type of cables, or just another piece? I can't > > change cables by myself, servers are dedicated from provider, but as I > > can saw, they picked whole new machine from their HW storage and put new > > Samsung disk drives in. So these two last machines are brand new with > > new cables. (Probably with a same type of cables - all machines are ASUS > > RS120) > I can confirm the same behaviour with a ULi M1689/Newcastle Athlon64 based > system running 6.1-RELEASE-p3 (i386). ad6 just detaches without warning and > it takes a reboot to bring it back. atacontrol reinit has no effect. Tried > the following to resolve the problems: > - Changed cables (both ad4 and ad6) > - Changed SATA power to legacy > - Moved the NIC and anything else from the shared PCI INT (thought I'd cracked > it at this point as it was stable for a month, then it lost ad6 on a nightly > dump) > - Remade my gmirror array as an ar. Put it straight back to gmirror again when > I found out what a pain it is to rebuild after ad6 disappears. I am not sure if it is related, but... I experienced a similar sort of problem, although the details in my case are quite different. What was similar was that I would "lose" two ATA drives from an array, inexplicably. Reconfiguring the same drives and rebuilding would cause them to work perfectly again -- for some number of days, after which the same failure would occur. What is different is that this was with a 3Ware RAID controller -- which made removing/raconfiguring/rebuilding much easier -- but I was seeing the exact same errors. This happened four times (with the same errors that have been discussed here), running 6.1 STABLE as of June 22. Before attempting to RMA the drives, I tried an updated kernel, 6.1 STABLE as of July 19. Strangely enough, the problems disappeared. So, while I have not checked everything that has changed, it _might_ be worth trying 6.1 STABLE... -- greg byshenk - gbyshenk@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 17:02:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D81A16A4E1 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:02:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bblue@netoldies.com) Received: from netoldies.com (nada.netoldies.com [66.146.162.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8024443D67 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:02:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bblue@netoldies.com) Received: from sovaio.netoldies.com by netoldies.com (MDaemon PRO v9.0.6) with ESMTP id md50000125236.msg for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:02:08 -0700 Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:02:05 -0700 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: "Bill Blue" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.01 (Win32) X-Spam-Processed: netoldies.com, Sun, 20 Aug 2006 10:02:08 -0700 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-Return-Path: bblue@netoldies.com X-Envelope-From: bblue@netoldies.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Motherboard RAID problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:02:20 -0000 I'm not sure if I'm expecting too much, or this is a real bug. Using FreeBSD 6.1 release, CVSup'd to current. The motherboard is a Supermicro P4SCT0 with a 3.2Ghz P4 and 2 DDR400 1G sticks of RAM. On the MB is a built-in RAID controller (Adaptec chip) for the SATA drives. You set it for discrete SATA or RAID. If RAID is set, on the next boot you have essentially a BIOS configuration for that 'device' consisting of the two SATA devices in either RAID 0 (striped) or RAID 1 (mirrored). I already had a functional SATA boot drive (first SATA device) which shows up on the OS as device ad4s1a-f. I added a second identical drive as the second SATA device, configured the BIOS setting for SATA RAID, rebooted, set up an array of RAID 1 with the first drive as the master. The second device was then built up as a mirror of the first and everything looked normal. Boot the OS now and all goes well with the device still showing up on /dev/ad4* but I couldn't tell if the mirroring was really working since the drives have no individual led indications. I then noticed that there was a new ad6* device, and guess what -- it was the second SATA drive and a mirror image of the *original* first drive. Watching it with DF for size changes when copying a large file to my home directory, it didn't change at all. ad6* were the only new devices seen in the OS. Went back to the BIOS which displayed that instead of two SATA drives there was one RAID unit as far as it's concerned. So it appears as though FreeBSD doesn't have the right drivers to actually see the RAID volume built by the BIOS and considers its members to be individual devices. Does this ring any bells with anyone? Suggestions? A separate and semi-related question, this system also has 16 other drives with two 3Ware 9500SML controllers and 8x500 and 8x750GB arrays. It's managed remotely with X. In this type of application, is Hyperthreading best on or off? Of course for just reading files it's not a big issue, but receiving large files seems to be largely limited by processing interrupts from the 1G ether. They shoot up to 50% and stay pretty consistent regardless of variations in the incoming stream. If Hyperthreading was off, wouldn't there be better performance inbound? Or would that be a tradeoff when the entire picture is taken into account? Thanks for any insights. --Bill From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 17:38:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D5316A4DE for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:38:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EDB343D45 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:38:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7KHcS4f060619; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:38:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1DC53B8A5; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:38:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:38:28 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Bill Blue Message-ID: <20060820173827.GA22931@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Bill Blue , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Motherboard RAID problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:38:32 -0000 --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 10:02:05AM -0700, Bill Blue wrote: > I'm not sure if I'm expecting too much, or this is a real bug. >=20 > Using FreeBSD 6.1 release, CVSup'd to current. The motherboard is a > Supermicro P4SCT0 with a 3.2Ghz P4 and 2 DDR400 1G sticks of RAM. On > the MB is a built-in RAID controller (Adaptec chip) for the SATA > drives. You set it for discrete SATA or RAID. If RAID is set, on the > next boot you have essentially a BIOS configuration for that 'device' > consisting of the two SATA devices in either RAID 0 (striped) or RAID > 1 (mirrored).=20 The ataraid(4) driver supports the Adaptec HostRAID. =20 > Boot the OS now and all goes well with the device still showing up on > /dev/ad4* but I couldn't tell if the mirroring was really working > since the drives have no individual led indications. I then noticed > that there was a new ad6* device, and guess what -- it was the second > SATA drive and a mirror image of the *original* first drive. Watching > it with DF for size changes when copying a large file to my home > directory, it didn't change at all.=20 >=20 > ad6* were the only new devices seen in the OS. If FreeBSD supports the device, you should see an ar0 device. Do you have the ataraid(4) driver loaded, or built into your kernel? Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE6J4TEnfvsMMhpyURApRhAJ9Ky7Idb5ym8X7lFTbPC2p+ogsdhgCfQTqo FU7w5TU/kKtQmzFTRFYGk2g= =VHVp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 17:51:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC7B16A4DA for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:51:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from home.quip.cz (grimm.quip.cz [213.220.192.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E79543D45 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:51:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (qwork.quip.test [192.168.1.2]) by home.quip.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1482581E; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:51:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44E8A121.7030808@quip.cz> Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:51:29 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cs, cz, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Byshenk References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> In-Reply-To: <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Matt Dawson , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:51:32 -0000 Greg Byshenk wrote: [...] > I am not sure if it is related, but... I experienced a similar sort of > problem, although the details in my case are quite different. > > What was similar was that I would "lose" two ATA drives from an array, > inexplicably. Reconfiguring the same drives and rebuilding would cause > them to work perfectly again -- for some number of days, after which > the same failure would occur. > > What is different is that this was with a 3Ware RAID controller -- > which made removing/raconfiguring/rebuilding much easier -- but I was > seeing the exact same errors. > > This happened four times (with the same errors that have been discussed > here), running 6.1 STABLE as of June 22. Before attempting to RMA the > drives, I tried an updated kernel, 6.1 STABLE as of July 19. Strangely > enough, the problems disappeared. > > So, while I have not checked everything that has changed, it _might_ be > worth trying 6.1 STABLE... I have problems with 6.1-RELEASE same as with 6.1-STABLE from August 2. I can try newer STABLE, but as I see on cvsweb, there are not much changes in ATA driver sources, only new chipsets added. It is strange to me, that I can see significant changes of read/write speed. (I am running nonstop tests with writing disk full of files, delete them, and start again + generating graphs) Speed vary from 2.5MB/s to 11MB/s by jumps. Not continuous from the lowest to the highest. Writing is for example 3MB/s for 20 hours, then jump to 10MB/s and after some time (6 - 20 hours) jump down to about 3MB/s. After some days of testing, disk disappear, system reboots itself, resynchronize gmirror and work for next few days till the next disk lose. Also earlier synchronization was done after 1:30 hour (at about 30MB/s), now synchronization run at lower speeds - from 2.5MB/s to 15MB/s, so the whole synchronization is done after more then 5 hours (the longest was 20 hours to synchronize 250GB HDDs) I don't know what more can I test, what more could be done to solve these problems. :( Any help will be appreciated Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 17:55:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F83A16A4DD for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:55:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from core.byshenk.net (core.byshenk.net [62.58.73.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F1E43D46 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:55:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from core.byshenk.net (localhost.aoes.com [127.0.0.1]) by core.byshenk.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7KHtlCZ051592 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:55:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from byshenknet@core.byshenk.net) Received: (from byshenknet@localhost) by core.byshenk.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k7KHtlbI051591 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:55:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from byshenknet) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:55:47 +0200 From: Greg Byshenk To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060820175547.GF633@core.byshenk.net> References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> <20060820173827.GA22931@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060820173827.GA22931@slackbox.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=failed version=3.1.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on core.byshenk.net Subject: Re: Motherboard RAID problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 17:55:51 -0000 On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 07:38:28PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 10:02:05AM -0700, Bill Blue wrote: > > I'm not sure if I'm expecting too much, or this is a real bug. > > Using FreeBSD 6.1 release, CVSup'd to current. The motherboard is a > > Supermicro P4SCT0 with a 3.2Ghz P4 and 2 DDR400 1G sticks of RAM. On > > the MB is a built-in RAID controller (Adaptec chip) for the SATA > > drives. You set it for discrete SATA or RAID. If RAID is set, on the > > next boot you have essentially a BIOS configuration for that 'device' > > consisting of the two SATA devices in either RAID 0 (striped) or RAID > > 1 (mirrored). > The ataraid(4) driver supports the Adaptec HostRAID. > > > Boot the OS now and all goes well with the device still showing up on > > /dev/ad4* but I couldn't tell if the mirroring was really working > > since the drives have no individual led indications. I then noticed > > that there was a new ad6* device, and guess what -- it was the second > > SATA drive and a mirror image of the *original* first drive. Watching > > it with DF for size changes when copying a large file to my home > > directory, it didn't change at all. > > ad6* were the only new devices seen in the OS. > If FreeBSD supports the device, you should see an ar0 device. > Do you have the ataraid(4) driver loaded, or built into your kernel? Alternatively, are you sure you have identified your hardware correctly? According to Supermicro here the P4SCT has an Intel 6300ESB onboard RAID controller, which according to this page is based upon the ICH4, and not Adaptec controller. And, unless I've missed it, this controller is not supported. What does dmesg output say about the drives and controller? -- greg byshenk - gbyshenk@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 18:05:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA6D16A4DE for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:05:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from core.byshenk.net (core.byshenk.net [62.58.73.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F9F43D5D for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:05:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from core.byshenk.net (localhost.aoes.com [127.0.0.1]) by core.byshenk.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7KI4roj051709; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:04:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from byshenknet@core.byshenk.net) Received: (from byshenknet@localhost) by core.byshenk.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k7KI4rKq051708; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:04:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from byshenknet) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:04:53 +0200 From: Greg Byshenk To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060820180453.GG633@core.byshenk.net> References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> <44E8A121.7030808@quip.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44E8A121.7030808@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=failed version=3.1.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on core.byshenk.net Cc: Matt Dawson , Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:05:14 -0000 On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 07:51:29PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Greg Byshenk wrote: [...] > >This happened four times (with the same errors that have been discussed > >here), running 6.1 STABLE as of June 22. Before attempting to RMA the > >drives, I tried an updated kernel, 6.1 STABLE as of July 19. Strangely > >enough, the problems disappeared. > >So, while I have not checked everything that has changed, it _might_ be > >worth trying 6.1 STABLE... > I have problems with 6.1-RELEASE same as with 6.1-STABLE from August 2. > I can try newer STABLE, but as I see on cvsweb, there are not much > changes in ATA driver sources, only new chipsets added. It is only an idea, based on something that worked for me. And, as I said, my situation is not exactly the same as the others. > It is strange to me, that I can see significant changes of read/write > speed. (I am running nonstop tests with writing disk full of files, > delete them, and start again + generating graphs) Speed vary from > 2.5MB/s to 11MB/s by jumps. Not continuous from the lowest to the > highest. Writing is for example 3MB/s for 20 hours, then jump to 10MB/s > and after some time (6 - 20 hours) jump down to about 3MB/s. > After some days of testing, disk disappear, system reboots itself, > resynchronize gmirror and work for next few days till the next disk lose. > Also earlier synchronization was done after 1:30 hour (at about 30MB/s), > now synchronization run at lower speeds - from 2.5MB/s to 15MB/s, so the > whole synchronization is done after more then 5 hours (the longest was > 20 hours to synchronize 250GB HDDs) > I don't know what more can I test, what more could be done to solve > these problems. :( You are using gmirror, which I am not, so the situations are not analogous, since my situation was with h/w RAID. And I have no direct experience with gmirror (I use gvinum on a couple of secondary systems, but those are SCSI based). Does the output of 'systat -vm' tell you anything of interest? That is, are the disks running at or close to 100%, are the CPUs fully loaded, or anything else...? -- greg byshenk - gbyshenk@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 18:23:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0DA16A4DF for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:23:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 011B843D5A for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:22:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr12.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7KIMnTm061723 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:22:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E983AB8A5; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:22:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:22:48 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060820182248.GA24133@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> <20060820173827.GA22931@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20060820175547.GF633@core.byshenk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060820175547.GF633@core.byshenk.net> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Re: Motherboard RAID problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:23:06 -0000 --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 07:55:47PM +0200, Greg Byshenk wrote: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 07:38:28PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 10:02:05AM -0700, Bill Blue wrote: >=20 > > > I'm not sure if I'm expecting too much, or this is a real bug. >=20 > > > Using FreeBSD 6.1 release, CVSup'd to current. The motherboard is a > > > Supermicro P4SCT0 with a 3.2Ghz P4 and 2 DDR400 1G sticks of RAM. On > > > the MB is a built-in RAID controller (Adaptec chip) for the SATA > > > drives. You set it for discrete SATA or RAID. If RAID is set, on the > > > next boot you have essentially a BIOS configuration for that 'device' > > > consisting of the two SATA devices in either RAID 0 (striped) or RAID > > > 1 (mirrored).=20 >=20 > > The ataraid(4) driver supports the Adaptec HostRAID. > =20 > > > > > Boot the OS now and all goes well with the device still showing up on > > > /dev/ad4* but I couldn't tell if the mirroring was really working > > > since the drives have no individual led indications. I then noticed > > > that there was a new ad6* device, and guess what -- it was the second > > > SATA drive and a mirror image of the *original* first drive. Watching > > > it with DF for size changes when copying a large file to my home > > > directory, it didn't change at all.=20 >=20 > > > ad6* were the only new devices seen in the OS. > =20 > > If FreeBSD supports the device, you should see an ar0 device. > =20 > > Do you have the ataraid(4) driver loaded, or built into your kernel? >=20 >=20 > Alternatively, are you sure you have identified your hardware correctly? >=20 > According to Supermicro here >=20 > >=20 > the P4SCT has an Intel 6300ESB onboard RAID controller, which according to > this page >=20 > >=20 > is based upon the ICH4, and not Adaptec controller. And, unless I've > missed it, this controller is not supported. The ata(4) manual page lists the 6300ESB as supported. The ataraid(4) manual only lists the "Intel MatrixRAID" metadata format as supported. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE6Kh4EnfvsMMhpyURApgFAJ0cjzimznnsjXBn/lCWLMkq6aImlACfUxqg 23yuFQO4g6sSrxa8AuuxYK0= =g0w5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3V7upXqbjpZ4EhLz-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 18:37:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89B316A4DE for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from core.byshenk.net (core.byshenk.net [62.58.73.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6BA243D6E for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:37:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from core.byshenk.net (localhost.aoes.com [127.0.0.1]) by core.byshenk.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7KIbY8J052027 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:37:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from byshenknet@core.byshenk.net) Received: (from byshenknet@localhost) by core.byshenk.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k7KIbYtU052026 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:37:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from byshenknet) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:37:34 +0200 From: Greg Byshenk To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060820183734.GH633@core.byshenk.net> References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> <20060820173827.GA22931@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20060820175547.GF633@core.byshenk.net> <20060820182248.GA24133@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060820182248.GA24133@slackbox.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=failed version=3.1.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on core.byshenk.net Subject: Re: Motherboard RAID problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:37:37 -0000 On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:22:48PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 07:55:47PM +0200, Greg Byshenk wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 07:38:28PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: > > > If FreeBSD supports the device, you should see an ar0 device. > > > Do you have the ataraid(4) driver loaded, or built into your kernel? > > Alternatively, are you sure you have identified your hardware correctly? > > According to Supermicro here > > > > the P4SCT has an Intel 6300ESB onboard RAID controller, which according to > > this page > > > > is based upon the ICH4, and not Adaptec controller. And, unless I've > > missed it, this controller is not supported. > The ata(4) manual page lists the 6300ESB as supported. The ataraid(4) > manual only lists the "Intel MatrixRAID" metadata format as supported. Well, the controller itself is supported, obviously (as an ATA controller), but I don't see that it is supported as a RAID controller. And, if this is the case -- ie: 1) the controller is indeed 6300ESB; and 2) it is supported as an ATA controller; but 3) it is not supported as a RAID controller -- then that would explain the situation described in the original message. That is: the system happily sees two individual ATA drives, but cannot see any array. This is all guesswork, but it makes sense. -- greg byshenk - gbyshenk@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 18:40:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8FC116A4ED for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:40:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from postman.atlantis.dp.ua (postman.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.47.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F53243D6A for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:40:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from atlantis.dp.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postman.atlantis.dp.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k7KIdgf9044373; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:39:42 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from localhost (dmitry@localhost) by atlantis.dp.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id k7KIdaKG044350; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:39:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:39:36 +0300 (EEST) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <44E722BB.8010807@quip.cz> Message-ID: <20060820212237.C6491@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> References: <8D08DDB6-6AC1-45B6-B2CE-08782F54968A@stromnet.org> <884C01BC-3E97-46EC-AA8B-E70C3931F3A4@stromnet.org> <36895211-2796-4213-B336-6279AB3AC3CB@stromnet.org> <20060713132357.Y61840@fledge.watson.org> <44B7EA39.4060509@quip.cz> <6.2.3.4.0.20060716185019.12a29240@64.7.153.2> <44BBAF52.9080007@quip.cz> <0B43BAB0-BBF0-4E2C-875D-6E1E00BAB1D4@stromnet.org> <44E722BB.8010807@quip.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johan_Str=F6m?= , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 18:40:16 -0000 Hello! On Sat, 19 Aug 2006, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Aug 19 15:11:20 track ntpd[456]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 > Aug 19 15:15:47 track kernel: ad6: FAILURE - device detached > Aug 19 15:15:47 track kernel: subdisk6: detached > Aug 19 15:15:47 track kernel: ad6: detached I think that's a shame to have such a "error recovery" in one of the basic drivers. ATA driver gives absolutely no clue about the reason of the failure and just disconnects device. I'm curious why the driver behaves in this way. If SATA code is just raw, it definitely must be corrected to implement proper error recovery. If SATA specification is written so purely that proper error recovery is just impossible (I really doubt if it's so), then SATA hardware should be simply avoided in mission-critical applications. Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 19:13:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BF516A4DA for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from home.quip.cz (grimm.quip.cz [213.220.192.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D3743D45 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:13:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (qwork.quip.test [192.168.1.2]) by home.quip.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A41BB581E; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:13:27 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44E8B457.8060406@quip.cz> Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 21:13:27 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cs, cz, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Byshenk References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> <44E8A121.7030808@quip.cz> <20060820180453.GG633@core.byshenk.net> In-Reply-To: <20060820180453.GG633@core.byshenk.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Matt Dawson , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:13:30 -0000 Greg Byshenk wrote: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 07:51:29PM +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > >>Greg Byshenk wrote: > > [...] > >>>This happened four times (with the same errors that have been discussed >>>here), running 6.1 STABLE as of June 22. Before attempting to RMA the >>>drives, I tried an updated kernel, 6.1 STABLE as of July 19. Strangely >>>enough, the problems disappeared. > > >>>So, while I have not checked everything that has changed, it _might_ be >>>worth trying 6.1 STABLE... > > >>I have problems with 6.1-RELEASE same as with 6.1-STABLE from August 2. >>I can try newer STABLE, but as I see on cvsweb, there are not much >>changes in ATA driver sources, only new chipsets added. > > > It is only an idea, based on something that worked for me. And, as I > said, my situation is not exactly the same as the others. > >>It is strange to me, that I can see significant changes of read/write >>speed. (I am running nonstop tests with writing disk full of files, >>delete them, and start again + generating graphs) Speed vary from >>2.5MB/s to 11MB/s by jumps. Not continuous from the lowest to the >>highest. Writing is for example 3MB/s for 20 hours, then jump to 10MB/s >>and after some time (6 - 20 hours) jump down to about 3MB/s. >>After some days of testing, disk disappear, system reboots itself, >>resynchronize gmirror and work for next few days till the next disk lose. >>Also earlier synchronization was done after 1:30 hour (at about 30MB/s), >>now synchronization run at lower speeds - from 2.5MB/s to 15MB/s, so the >>whole synchronization is done after more then 5 hours (the longest was >>20 hours to synchronize 250GB HDDs) > > >>I don't know what more can I test, what more could be done to solve >>these problems. :( > > > You are using gmirror, which I am not, so the situations are not > analogous, since my situation was with h/w RAID. And I have no direct > experience with gmirror (I use gvinum on a couple of secondary systems, > but those are SCSI based). > > Does the output of 'systat -vm' tell you anything of interest? That is, > are the disks running at or close to 100%, are the CPUs fully loaded, or > anything else...? There is nothing interesting in systat / gstat / top or anything else. System is almost idle, just running test script for disk writing. Speed problems is not dependent on gmirror. I deactivated gmirror on second machine and run test on normaly mounted filesystems with same low speeds ;( This is systat from gmirrored system running test: 4 users Load 0.01 0.02 0.00 Aug 20 21:06 Mem:KB REAL VIRTUAL VN PAGER SWAP PAGER Tot Share Tot Share Free in out in out Act 124144 9580 897616 27168 43016 count All 1016728 75888364464876 210508 pages Interrupts Proc:r p d s w Csw Trp Sys Int Sof Flt cow 4144 total 7 75 979 4 155 288 27 161484 wire 1: atkb 191292 act 14: ata 0.4%Sys 0.0%Intr 0.0%User 0.0%Nice 99.6%Idl 624272 inact 11 16: bge | | | | | | | | | | 41360 cache 133 19: ata 1656 free 2000 cpu0: time daefr 2000 cpu1: time Namei Name-cache Dir-cache prcfr Calls hits % hits % react 6 6 100 pdwake zfod 1354 pdpgs Disks ad4 ad6 ozfod intrn KB/t 125 126 %slo-z 113888 buf tps 34 33 1407 tfree 17 dirtybuf MB/s 4.13 4.10 69977 desiredvnodes % busy 54 48 20661 numvnodes 17286 freevnodes From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 19:24:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522AF16A4DE for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:24:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bblue@netoldies.com) Received: from netoldies.com (nada.netoldies.com [66.146.162.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9265F43D67 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:24:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bblue@netoldies.com) Received: from sovaio.netoldies.com by netoldies.com (MDaemon PRO v9.0.6) with ESMTP id md50000125275.msg for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:24:40 -0700 Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:24:36 -0700 To: "Roland Smith" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: "Bill Blue" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> <20060820173827.GA22931@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20060820175547.GF633@core.byshenk.net> <20060820182248.GA24133@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20060820182248.GA24133@slackbox.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.01 (Win32) X-Spam-Processed: netoldies.com, Sun, 20 Aug 2006 12:24:40 -0700 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-Return-Path: bblue@netoldies.com X-Envelope-From: bblue@netoldies.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: Motherboard RAID problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:24:43 -0000 On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 11:22:48 -0700, Roland Smith wrot= e: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 07:55:47PM +0200, Greg Byshenk wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 07:38:28PM +0200, Roland Smith wrote: >> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 10:02:05AM -0700, Bill Blue wrote: >> >> > > I'm not sure if I'm expecting too much, or this is a real bug. >> >> > > Using FreeBSD 6.1 release, CVSup'd to current. The motherboard is= a >> > > Supermicro P4SCT0 with a 3.2Ghz P4 and 2 DDR400 1G sticks of RAM.= On >> > > the MB is a built-in RAID controller (Adaptec chip) for the SATA >> > > drives. You set it for discrete SATA or RAID. If RAID is set, o= n the >> > > next boot you have essentially a BIOS configuration for that 'dev= ice' >> > > consisting of the two SATA devices in either RAID 0 (striped) or = RAID >> > > 1 (mirrored). >> >> > The ataraid(4) driver supports the Adaptec HostRAID. >> >> > >> > > Boot the OS now and all goes well with the device still showing u= p on >> > > /dev/ad4* but I couldn't tell if the mirroring was really working= >> > > since the drives have no individual led indications. I then noti= ced >> > > that there was a new ad6* device, and guess what -- it was the se= cond >> > > SATA drive and a mirror image of the *original* first drive. Wat= ching >> > > it with DF for size changes when copying a large file to my home >> > > directory, it didn't change at all. >> >> > > ad6* were the only new devices seen in the OS. >> >> > If FreeBSD supports the device, you should see an ar0 device. >> >> > Do you have the ataraid(4) driver loaded, or built into your kernel= ? >> >> >> Alternatively, are you sure you have identified your hardware correct= ly? >> >> According to Supermicro here >> >> >> >> the P4SCT has an Intel 6300ESB onboard RAID controller, which accordi= ng to >> this page >> >> >> >> is based upon the ICH4, and not Adaptec controller. And, unless I've= >> missed it, this controller is not supported. > > The ata(4) manual page lists the 6300ESB as supported. The ataraid(4) > manual only lists the "Intel MatrixRAID" metadata format as supported.= > > Roland Roland, Greg, Thanks for the replies. The Intel 6300ESB (aka Hance Rapids I/O Control= ler Hub) serves as a controller for USB 2.0, UDMA100 and SATA150 devices= . Separately of that, there's the Adaptec embedded SATA with Hostraid c= ontroller driver which comes into play if you activate RAID in the BIOS.= Since they refer to it as Adaptec's Hostraid controller, it looks like a= taraid(4) should support it. And Nooooo, I didn't have ataraid defined in my kernel. It was, but for= some reason it isn't now. I'll uh, have to add and rebuild. Thanks fo= r pointing out my error. Now, when the ar0s1a-f devices do show up, does the boot device actually= get changed from ad4* to ar0* or do I need to boot single user while it= 's talking to ad4* and change the mount points and reboot? I've never p= layed much with changing boot devices. --Bill From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 19:40:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F56416A4DA for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:40:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from H43.C18.B96.tor.eicat.ca (H43.C18.B96.tor.eicat.ca [66.96.18.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E831543D72 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:40:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikej@rogers.com) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (desktop.home.local [172.16.0.200]) by H43.C18.B96.tor.eicat.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F8011455; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:40:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <44E8BAC2.108@rogers.com> Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:40:50 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> References: <8D08DDB6-6AC1-45B6-B2CE-08782F54968A@stromnet.org> <884C01BC-3E97-46EC-AA8B-E70C3931F3A4@stromnet.org> <36895211-2796-4213-B336-6279AB3AC3CB@stromnet.org> <20060713132357.Y61840@fledge.watson.org> <44B7EA39.4060509@quip.cz> <6.2.3.4.0.20060716185019.12a29240@64.7.153.2> <44BBAF52.9080007@quip.cz> <0B43BAB0-BBF0-4E2C-875D-6E1E00BAB1D4@stromnet.org> <44E722BB.8010807@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <44E722BB.8010807@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SpamToaster-Information: This messages has been scanned by SpamToaster http://www.digitalprogression.ca X-SpamToaster: Found to be clean X-SpamToaster-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.49, required 3.5, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME 0.00, DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 0.20, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST 1.71) X-SpamToaster-From: mikej@rogers.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johan_Str=F6m?= , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:40:52 -0000 Miroslav Lachman wrote: > I upgraded to RELENG_6, changed all HW (whole servers and changed > Seagate HHDs to Samsung so every piece of HW is different from time of > my first post), but after one week I got the same error and system > reboot today: > Aug 19 15:11:20 track ntpd[456]: kernel time sync enabled 2001 > Aug 19 15:15:47 track kernel: ad6: FAILURE - device detached > Aug 19 15:15:47 track kernel: subdisk6: detached > Aug 19 15:15:47 track kernel: ad6: detached > Aug 19 15:15:47 track kernel: GEOM_MIRROR: Device gm0: provider ad6 > disconnected. > Aug 19 15:15:47 track kernel: > g_vfs_done():mirror/gm0s2d[READ(offset=1169260544, leng > th=131072)]error = 6 > Aug 19 15:22:34 track syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel > > From my point of view - this is not related to 1 piece of HW, but > general problem of ICH7 chipset or (s)ATA driver in FreeBSD 6.x. As > other poster has different chipsets (ICH6 and nVidia), it seems more > FreeBSD ATA driver related. (7 different machines was tried) > Just a "me too", i have the same problems with ICH7 and disks mysteriously disconnecting. Aug 14 16:54:47 mx1 kernel: ad4: FAILURE - device detached Aug 14 16:54:47 mx1 kernel: ad4: detaGEOM_MIRROR:ched Device gm: provider ad4 disconnected. I think there definitely is a problem with the chipset/driver. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 20:38:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6AF16A4E0 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:38:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) Received: from koef.zs64.net (koef.zs64.net [213.238.47.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D85043D45 for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:37:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) Received: (from stb@koef.zs64.net) (authenticated) by koef.zs64.net (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7KKbi7w026229 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:37:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) In-Reply-To: References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> <20060820173827.GA22931@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20060820175547.GF633@core.byshenk.net> <20060820182248.GA24133@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stefan Bethke Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:37:42 +0200 To: Bill Blue X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Roland Smith , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Motherboard RAID problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:38:02 -0000 Am 20.08.2006 um 21:24 schrieb Bill Blue: > Now, when the ar0s1a-f devices do show up, does the boot device > actually get changed from ad4* to ar0* or do I need to boot single > user while it's talking to ad4* and change the mount points and > reboot? I've never played much with changing boot devices. loader(8) will parse the /etc/fstab of the partition it's on to find the root filesystem and use whatever device specification it finds there to pass to the kernel. To boot off the RAID, you'll need to change the fstab to the proper device. Stefan -- Stefan Bethke Fon +49 170 346 0140 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 20 22:20:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9903516A4FF for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:20:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF2443D4C for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:20:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from slackbox.xs4all.nl (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7KMKGPb048529; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:20:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.xs4all.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D1BFFB8A5; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:20:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:20:15 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Bill Blue Message-ID: <20060820222015.GA29567@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Bill Blue , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> <20060820173827.GA22931@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20060820175547.GF633@core.byshenk.net> <20060820182248.GA24133@slackbox.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Motherboard RAID problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:20:19 -0000 --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 12:24:36PM -0700, Bill Blue wrote: > On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 11:22:48 -0700, Roland Smith wrote: >=20 > >> > > ad6* were the only new devices seen in the OS. > >> > >> > If FreeBSD supports the device, you should see an ar0 device. > >> > >> > Do you have the ataraid(4) driver loaded, or built into your kernel? > >> > >> > >> Alternatively, are you sure you have identified your hardware correctl= y? > >> > >> According to Supermicro here > >> > >> > >> > >> the P4SCT has an Intel 6300ESB onboard RAID controller, which accordin= g to > >> this page > >> > >> > >> > >> is based upon the ICH4, and not Adaptec controller. And, unless I've > >> missed it, this controller is not supported. > > > > The ata(4) manual page lists the 6300ESB as supported. The ataraid(4) > > manual only lists the "Intel MatrixRAID" metadata format as supported. > > > > Roland >=20 > Roland, Greg, >=20 > Thanks for the replies. The Intel 6300ESB (aka Hance Rapids I/O > Controller Hub) serves as a controller for USB 2.0, UDMA100 and > SATA150 devices. Separately of that, there's the Adaptec embedded > SATA with Hostraid controller driver which comes into play if you > activate RAID in the BIOS.=20 >=20 > Since they refer to it as Adaptec's Hostraid controller, it looks like > ataraid(4) should support it.=20 Looks like it. > And Nooooo, I didn't have ataraid defined in my kernel. It was, but > for some reason it isn't now. I'll uh, have to add and rebuild. > Thanks for pointing out my error.=20 Or you could load the module that is built (in the GENERIC kernel, at least). Putting ataraid_load=3D"YES" in /boot/loader.conf should work. > Now, when the ar0s1a-f devices do show up, does the boot device > actually get changed from ad4* to ar0* or do I need to boot single > user while it's talking to ad4* and change the mount points and > reboot? I've never played much with changing boot devices.=20 Me neither :-) I created the RAID1 array in the BIOS, and picked ar0 in sysinstall. I guess you'd have to look in the loader(8) manual and chapter 12 of the Handbook. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE6OAfEnfvsMMhpyURAgvHAKCYg/6CNeEZSA7ynf5oCWGSza5PEACbBUjv /lnxmKf9g21DtQ22olPRbP0= =ipvd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 02:03:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFB616A4DA for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:03:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saurbier@math.uni-bielefeld.de) Received: from mail2.math.uni-bielefeld.de (mail2.math.uni-bielefeld.de [129.70.14.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 926CF43D4C for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:03:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from saurbier@math.uni-bielefeld.de) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (i577BA2E0.versanet.de [87.123.162.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.math.uni-bielefeld.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E1C73020; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 04:03:53 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-13--422514801" Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Konstantin Saurbier Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 04:03:47 +0200 To: Greg Byshenk X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.2 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:03:57 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-13--422514801 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Am 20.08.2006 um 18:20 schrieb Greg Byshenk: > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 01:38:55PM +0100, Matt Dawson wrote: >> On Sunday 20 August 2006 13:00, freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org >> wrote: > >>> Do you mean different type of cables, or just another piece? I can't >>> change cables by myself, servers are dedicated from provider, but >>> as I >>> can saw, they picked whole new machine from their HW storage and >>> put new >>> Samsung disk drives in. So these two last machines are brand new >>> with >>> new cables. (Probably with a same type of cables - all machines >>> are ASUS >>> RS120) > >> I can confirm the same behaviour with a ULi M1689/Newcastle >> Athlon64 based >> system running 6.1-RELEASE-p3 (i386). ad6 just detaches without >> warning and >> it takes a reboot to bring it back. atacontrol reinit has no >> effect. Tried >> the following to resolve the problems: > >> - Changed cables (both ad4 and ad6) >> - Changed SATA power to legacy >> - Moved the NIC and anything else from the shared PCI INT (thought >> I'd cracked >> it at this point as it was stable for a month, then it lost ad6 on >> a nightly >> dump) >> - Remade my gmirror array as an ar. Put it straight back to >> gmirror again when >> I found out what a pain it is to rebuild after ad6 disappears. > > I am not sure if it is related, but... I experienced a similar > sort of > problem, although the details in my case are quite different. > > What was similar was that I would "lose" two ATA drives from an array, > inexplicably. Reconfiguring the same drives and rebuilding would > cause > them to work perfectly again -- for some number of days, after which > the same failure would occur. > > What is different is that this was with a 3Ware RAID controller -- > which made removing/raconfiguring/rebuilding much easier -- but I was > seeing the exact same errors. No your errors are not related. As of my experience (and the experience of others) the controller forgetting or loosing drives is a "feature" 3ware. We had similar problems with 3ware-7500-8 ATA controllers and i was reported of the same errors with 3ware-9000 series. Our in-house 3ware-9500S are not showing this kind of errors. This errors are not driver or OS dependent such as they appear on FreeBSD as well on different Linux distros. Since not all controllers suffering of these errors it is maybe depending on the firmware or board/chip revisions. -- Best regards, Konstantin Saurbier ------------------------------------------------------ Konstantin Saurbier Tel.: 0521 106 3861 Computerlabor Mathematik U5-138 Universitaet Bielefeld Universitaetsstr.25 33501 Bielefeld email: saurbier@math.uni-bielefeld.de ------------------------------------------------------ --Apple-Mail-13--422514801 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) iD8DBQFE6RSIWkvQTx5k+y4RAiD6AJ9cAtrTTz1UJFhr5MkqgW/eI4iblQCeO4or QSX/WGNhQFr5Ma0pSOQczSk= =xAyU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-13--422514801-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 02:42:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EEA216A4DD for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:42:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA4643D49 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:42:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (inchoate.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.25]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.5/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7L2gbS7034170 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:12:37 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:12:27 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1676629.xqgy8n6BMl"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200608211212.34514.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -1.36 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 203.31.81.10 Subject: ATA RAID oddity.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:42:42 -0000 --nextPart1676629.xqgy8n6BMl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline I am having issues with a VIA RAID system and so I disabled the RAID and ju= st=20 used a single drive (it was in a mirror) - I did this because the=20 hardware/firmware sucks, not because of a FreeBSD bug! However I notice this.. ar0: 305245MB status: BROKEN ar0: disk0 DOWN no device found for this subdisk ie there is metadata but it has no drive entries..=20 It's not a problem as such but it is weird. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1676629.xqgy8n6BMl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBE6R2a5ZPcIHs/zowRAl8PAJ9ourU20z5iSZCRzu6Uvw1Db/4y8QCfU2Ly myxt1XUKWHIOjuS+F1uw0Ao= =xzEx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1676629.xqgy8n6BMl-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 02:55:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A846816A4DF for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:55:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32E943D6D for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:55:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s6so1524840wxc for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:55:31 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ui73D3rnsa19Zq68DXex09f610rsa9WJPivR8NzbXDEvPcnFMVgKTpPRlefDzvzEMiPCwI9+UIvgR4EIILdONEW6NOqQfUDHM4819g1fZVaGE/EwgdJuL6kZ/bseXHaIo9LlzHNEQcZTj7i1/jPYXrnq3KqQDh+VDDJV7WflgMQ= Received: by 10.70.44.5 with SMTP id r5mr8777860wxr; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:55:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.49.3 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:55:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 19:55:31 -0700 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Jack Vogel" In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0606011523k462c8fedw3678558024d72191@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2a41acea0606011523k462c8fedw3678558024d72191@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: diffs to add newer Intel ATA and ICHSMB IDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:55:35 -0000 On 6/1/06, Jack Vogel wrote: > I occasionally run into issues that newer PCI device IDs are > not yet supported, these in particular are on a new box > I am working on. Can someone see that these changes > get integrated please :) > > Cheers, > > Jack > > --- dev/ata/ata-chipset.orig.c Fri Jun 2 05:39:18 2006 > +++ dev/ata/ata-chipset.c Fri Jun 2 05:38:34 2006 > @@ -1595,6 +1595,8 @@ > { ATA_I82801GB_R1, 0, AHCI, 0x00, ATA_SA300, "ICH7" }, > { ATA_I82801GB_M, 0, AHCI, 0x00, ATA_SA300, "ICH7" }, > { ATA_I82801GB_AH, 0, AHCI, 0x00, ATA_SA300, "ICH7" }, > + { ATA_I631xESB, 0, 0, 0x00, ATA_UDMA5, "631xESB" }, > + { ATA_I631xESB_S1, 0, AHCI, 0x00, ATA_SA300, "631xESB" }, > { ATA_I31244, 0, 0, 0x00, ATA_SA150, "31244" }, > { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}}; > char buffer[64]; > --- dev/ata/ata-pci.orig.h Fri Jun 2 05:30:03 2006 > +++ dev/ata/ata-pci.h Fri Jun 2 05:30:47 2006 > @@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ > #define ATA_I82801FB_S1 0x26518086 > #define ATA_I82801FB_R1 0x26528086 > #define ATA_I82801FB_M 0x26538086 > +#define ATA_I631xESB_S1 0x26808086 > +#define ATA_I631xESB 0x269e8086 > #define ATA_I82801GB 0x27df8086 > #define ATA_I82801GB_S1 0x27c08086 > #define ATA_I82801GB_R1 0x27c38086 > --- dev/ichsmb/ichsmb_pci.orig.c Fri Jun 2 05:17:21 2006 > +++ dev/ichsmb/ichsmb_pci.c Fri Jun 2 05:20:04 2006 > @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ > #define ID_82801DC 0x24C38086 > #define ID_82801EB 0x24D38086 > #define ID_6300ESB 0x25a48086 > +#define ID_631xESB 0x269b8086 > > #define PCIS_SERIALBUS_SMBUS_PROGIF 0x00 > > @@ -145,6 +146,9 @@ > break; > case ID_6300ESB: > device_set_desc(dev, "Intel 6300ESB (ICH) SMBus controller"); > + break; > + case ID_631xESB: > + device_set_desc(dev, "Intel 631xESB (ESB2) SMBus controller"); > break; > default: > if (pci_get_class(dev) == PCIC_SERIALBUS > _______________________________________________ Did this ever get commited? I have a Intel 5000p MCH + 6321ESB ICH and onboard SATA is basically completely broken. If you hookup more then one SATA drive it will hang the system at boot... I've played with every setting in the BIOS... I'm Running 6-STABLE 200608180000. Would this fix my problems? -- BSD Podcasts @: http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/ http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 03:42:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6A7C16A4DA for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 03:42:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4878F43D45 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 03:42:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so2229927pye for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:42:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=croUF1VXUZNghLdleMa4k0PxLYd0vI3/93PpJhg5sX/w9GoxJd4fzepkXd9L5KMjwDWVnbaganzBme+ycVVBdB1vD9PqFf+Yb5HgA/5mah/02sOw7SkKNr2ECEPJqGOgsw1MIwaA1Tp15WdqcfxgfeuaXx0hUYg28BybXhXKPPM= Received: by 10.35.93.15 with SMTP id v15mr12249666pyl; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:42:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.119.1 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:42:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2a41acea0608202042ib4aff22h8b07b3b62e363713@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:42:32 -0700 From: "Jack Vogel" To: "Nikolas Britton" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2a41acea0606011523k462c8fedw3678558024d72191@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: diffs to add newer Intel ATA and ICHSMB IDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 03:42:34 -0000 On 8/20/06, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 6/1/06, Jack Vogel wrote: > > I occasionally run into issues that newer PCI device IDs are > > not yet supported, these in particular are on a new box > > I am working on. Can someone see that these changes > > get integrated please :) > > > > Cheers, > > > > Jack > > > > --- dev/ata/ata-chipset.orig.c Fri Jun 2 05:39:18 2006 > > +++ dev/ata/ata-chipset.c Fri Jun 2 05:38:34 2006 > > @@ -1595,6 +1595,8 @@ > > { ATA_I82801GB_R1, 0, AHCI, 0x00, ATA_SA300, "ICH7" }, > > { ATA_I82801GB_M, 0, AHCI, 0x00, ATA_SA300, "ICH7" }, > > { ATA_I82801GB_AH, 0, AHCI, 0x00, ATA_SA300, "ICH7" }, > > + { ATA_I631xESB, 0, 0, 0x00, ATA_UDMA5, "631xESB" }, > > + { ATA_I631xESB_S1, 0, AHCI, 0x00, ATA_SA300, "631xESB" }, > > { ATA_I31244, 0, 0, 0x00, ATA_SA150, "31244" }, > > { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}}; > > char buffer[64]; > > --- dev/ata/ata-pci.orig.h Fri Jun 2 05:30:03 2006 > > +++ dev/ata/ata-pci.h Fri Jun 2 05:30:47 2006 > > @@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ > > #define ATA_I82801FB_S1 0x26518086 > > #define ATA_I82801FB_R1 0x26528086 > > #define ATA_I82801FB_M 0x26538086 > > +#define ATA_I631xESB_S1 0x26808086 > > +#define ATA_I631xESB 0x269e8086 > > #define ATA_I82801GB 0x27df8086 > > #define ATA_I82801GB_S1 0x27c08086 > > #define ATA_I82801GB_R1 0x27c38086 > > --- dev/ichsmb/ichsmb_pci.orig.c Fri Jun 2 05:17:21 2006 > > +++ dev/ichsmb/ichsmb_pci.c Fri Jun 2 05:20:04 2006 > > @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ > > #define ID_82801DC 0x24C38086 > > #define ID_82801EB 0x24D38086 > > #define ID_6300ESB 0x25a48086 > > +#define ID_631xESB 0x269b8086 > > > > #define PCIS_SERIALBUS_SMBUS_PROGIF 0x00 > > > > @@ -145,6 +146,9 @@ > > break; > > case ID_6300ESB: > > device_set_desc(dev, "Intel 6300ESB (ICH) SMBus controller"); > > + break; > > + case ID_631xESB: > > + device_set_desc(dev, "Intel 631xESB (ESB2) SMBus controller"); > > break; > > default: > > if (pci_get_class(dev) == PCIC_SERIALBUS > > _______________________________________________ > > > Did this ever get commited? I have a Intel 5000p MCH + 6321ESB ICH and > onboard SATA is basically completely broken. If you hookup more then > one SATA drive it will hang the system at boot... I've played with > every setting in the BIOS... I'm Running 6-STABLE 200608180000. Would > this fix my problems? As far as I know this hasnt been committed, I've not looked. Will it fix your problem, hmm, depends on if its one of the devices I'm adding, is it? Can you not patch yourself and test it? In any case, this is a fix that should be integrated, its hardware support. Jack From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 05:18:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2589316A4E6 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:18:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darren.pilgrim@bitfreak.org) Received: from mail.twinthornes.com (mail.twinthornes.com [65.75.198.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342EC43DFA for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:17:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from darren.pilgrim@bitfreak.org) Received: from [10.242.169.24] (c-67-171-135-169.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.135.169]) by mail.twinthornes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B93101424; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:17:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.1.405 [268.11.3/423]); Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:18:30 -0700 Message-ID: <44E94222.5050602@bitfreak.org> Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:18:26 -0700 From: Darren Pilgrim User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johnie Wong References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fail to install the driver of the on-board LAN Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:18:30 -0000 Johnie Wong wrote: > Dear All, > > I am the user of FreeBSD 6.1. Recently, i buy a new server for my > company which is a Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 (1.86GHz) with Intel > D946GZIS mainboard, 2GB Consair DDR2 Ram, 3Ware 9500S-4LP, and 4X > Seagate 250GB SATA II Harddrive. But when i install the on-board LAN > card driver by activating the default fxp option, it is invisible. That board is really new, so I would guess you have a new network controller with a PCI ID FreeBSD doesn't know about yet. It's a pretty common occurrence, especially with Intel NICs. Post the complete output of `pciconf -lv` (preferrably as an attached text file) and someone will see if this is the case. -- Darren Pilgrim From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 05:34:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B3116A4DA for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB3343D5D for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:34:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so1442517wxd for ; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:34:09 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qPewMkO471iLNlw8ugioMUoIeCvMxbkZmYusofzznI5uHVlsK5vh1pUbgTSfyHa/KEn2Pt5ihkHc2NVJhIx3MnP3JmWHW8wpagkoQn4iWUbvkeH+lUg5oPFiWsVcW6wk3wdxPXMbhx2YtTe3opzptNhRgP58Fax5xcJTegFS4es= Received: by 10.70.15.15 with SMTP id 15mr8930687wxo; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:17:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.49.3 with HTTP; Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:17:45 -0700 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Jack Vogel" In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0608202042ib4aff22h8b07b3b62e363713@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2a41acea0606011523k462c8fedw3678558024d72191@mail.gmail.com> <2a41acea0608202042ib4aff22h8b07b3b62e363713@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: diffs to add newer Intel ATA and ICHSMB IDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 05:34:11 -0000 On 8/20/06, Jack Vogel wrote: > On 8/20/06, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > On 6/1/06, Jack Vogel wrote: > > > I occasionally run into issues that newer PCI device IDs are > > > not yet supported, these in particular are on a new box > > > I am working on. Can someone see that these changes > > > get integrated please :) > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Jack > > > > > > --- dev/ata/ata-chipset.orig.c Fri Jun 2 05:39:18 2006 > > > +++ dev/ata/ata-chipset.c Fri Jun 2 05:38:34 2006 > > > @@ -1595,6 +1595,8 @@ > > > { ATA_I82801GB_R1, 0, AHCI, 0x00, ATA_SA300, "ICH7" }, > > > { ATA_I82801GB_M, 0, AHCI, 0x00, ATA_SA300, "ICH7" }, > > > { ATA_I82801GB_AH, 0, AHCI, 0x00, ATA_SA300, "ICH7" }, > > > + { ATA_I631xESB, 0, 0, 0x00, ATA_UDMA5, "631xESB" }, > > > + { ATA_I631xESB_S1, 0, AHCI, 0x00, ATA_SA300, "631xESB" }, > > > { ATA_I31244, 0, 0, 0x00, ATA_SA150, "31244" }, > > > { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}}; > > > char buffer[64]; > > > --- dev/ata/ata-pci.orig.h Fri Jun 2 05:30:03 2006 > > > +++ dev/ata/ata-pci.h Fri Jun 2 05:30:47 2006 > > > @@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ > > > #define ATA_I82801FB_S1 0x26518086 > > > #define ATA_I82801FB_R1 0x26528086 > > > #define ATA_I82801FB_M 0x26538086 > > > +#define ATA_I631xESB_S1 0x26808086 > > > +#define ATA_I631xESB 0x269e8086 > > > #define ATA_I82801GB 0x27df8086 > > > #define ATA_I82801GB_S1 0x27c08086 > > > #define ATA_I82801GB_R1 0x27c38086 > > > --- dev/ichsmb/ichsmb_pci.orig.c Fri Jun 2 05:17:21 2006 > > > +++ dev/ichsmb/ichsmb_pci.c Fri Jun 2 05:20:04 2006 > > > @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ > > > #define ID_82801DC 0x24C38086 > > > #define ID_82801EB 0x24D38086 > > > #define ID_6300ESB 0x25a48086 > > > +#define ID_631xESB 0x269b8086 > > > > > > #define PCIS_SERIALBUS_SMBUS_PROGIF 0x00 > > > > > > @@ -145,6 +146,9 @@ > > > break; > > > case ID_6300ESB: > > > device_set_desc(dev, "Intel 6300ESB (ICH) SMBus controller"); > > > + break; > > > + case ID_631xESB: > > > + device_set_desc(dev, "Intel 631xESB (ESB2) SMBus controller"); > > > break; > > > default: > > > if (pci_get_class(dev) == PCIC_SERIALBUS > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > Did this ever get commited? I have a Intel 5000p MCH + 6321ESB ICH and > > onboard SATA is basically completely broken. If you hookup more then > > one SATA drive it will hang the system at boot... I've played with > > every setting in the BIOS... I'm Running 6-STABLE 200608180000. Would > > this fix my problems? > > As far as I know this hasnt been committed, I've not looked. > Will it fix your problem, hmm, depends on if its one of the devices > I'm adding, is it? > > Can you not patch yourself and test it? > Not exactly. I'm putting this new server in production as we speak! I was using an IDE drive in the testing phase, I assumed the SATA drives I planned to transfer to this new server from another server would just work even if only in legacy mode. dead wrong! Commitments have already been made so I can't stop. Luckily plan B worked so I just disabled onboard SATA. Thank for the info... -- BSD Podcasts @: http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/ http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 07:10:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FAB216A4DE for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:10:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26F743D5A for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:10:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [10.0.0.110]) by kagate1.punkt.de with ESMTP id k7L7AsdA005999 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:10:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k7L7Ara9005571; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:10:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93@hugo10.ka.punkt.de) Received: (from ry93@localhost) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id k7L7Ar5u005570; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:10:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:10:53 +0200 From: "Patrick M. Hausen" To: Konstantin Saurbier Message-ID: <20060821071053.GC5178@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Greg Byshenk Subject: New Intel boards (was: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:10:56 -0000 Hi, all! On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 04:03:47AM +0200, Konstantin Saurbier wrote: > This errors are not driver or OS dependent such as they appear on > FreeBSD as well on different Linux distros. > Since not all controllers suffering of these errors it is maybe > depending on the firmware or board/chip revisions. We have two brand new TYAN B5161G20SH4 systems that feature ICH7 controllers and SATA-hotplug-bays. One system is equipped with two Seagate ST3160811AS drives, the other one with WD1600YS-01SHB0 drives. Both are configured with gmirror for slice 1. No problems at all after several days of "make -j4 buildworld". OTOH I can confirm that I got random "watchdog timeouts" with the em driver. debug.mpsafenet=0 fixed the problem for now. HTH, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Vorholzstr. 25 Tel. 0721 9109 -0 Fax: -100 76137 Karlsruhe http://punkt.de From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 07:15:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F0AD16A4E9 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:15:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from master_web@xs4all.nl) Received: from jeremino.homeunix.net (jeremino.xs4all.nl [80.126.224.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257FE43D78 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:15:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from master_web@xs4all.nl) Received: from jeremina.homeunix.net ([10.0.0.5]) by jeremino.homeunix.net with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GF40N-00012x-Je for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:15:27 +0200 From: Johnnie To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:15:27 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Organization: Chaos MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608210915.27292.master_web@xs4all.nl> X-recieved-from: 10.0.0.5 Subject: test X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:15:29 -0000 test From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 07:22:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCEE16A4DF for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:22:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EB343D78 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:22:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id x3so692988nzd for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:22:39 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=muBTG0IqHh+bLrgbCBNczjeMMTRh+aPrrkBwm+hlXTdUbGH8aK77DnQZhiZhp6O40H0BxVo/idtzuYiH9xsu87TELWKcb4EMYGJt3KEwmKfI8UeG5U3QkYSdfi0/MLcpzTD9GkDwkNQnR3vtH31xPIftXhToQUscJ4ChklTqD2E= Received: by 10.64.156.3 with SMTP id d3mr6326073qbe; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:22:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr ( [211.53.35.84]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id c12sm163468nzc.2006.08.21.00.22.37; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 00:22:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (localhost.cdnetworks.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k7L7MBdt009835 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:22:11 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k7L7M6WW009834; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:22:06 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:22:06 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: "Patrick M. Hausen" Message-ID: <20060821072206.GA8029@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> <20060821071053.GC5178@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060821071053.GC5178@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Konstantin Saurbier , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Greg Byshenk Subject: Re: New Intel boards (was: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:22:55 -0000 On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:10:53AM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hi, all! > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 04:03:47AM +0200, Konstantin Saurbier wrote: > > > This errors are not driver or OS dependent such as they appear on > > FreeBSD as well on different Linux distros. > > Since not all controllers suffering of these errors it is maybe > > depending on the firmware or board/chip revisions. > > We have two brand new TYAN B5161G20SH4 systems that feature > ICH7 controllers and SATA-hotplug-bays. One system is equipped > with two Seagate ST3160811AS drives, the other one with > WD1600YS-01SHB0 drives. > Both are configured with gmirror for slice 1. > > No problems at all after several days of "make -j4 buildworld". > > OTOH I can confirm that I got random "watchdog timeouts" > with the em driver. debug.mpsafenet=0 fixed the problem > for now. > Several users reported em(4) watchdog errors but I couldn't reproduce it on my system. A blind patch posted to net ML and I'd like to hear success/failure report. See http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-August/011352.html Make sure to enable "debug.mpsafenet=1" during testing. -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 07:25:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E38116A4DA for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:25:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from saurbier@math.uni-bielefeld.de) Received: from mail2.math.uni-bielefeld.de (mail2.math.uni-bielefeld.de [129.70.14.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D378343D49 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:24:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from saurbier@math.uni-bielefeld.de) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (i577BA2E0.versanet.de [87.123.162.224]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.math.uni-bielefeld.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164CE7301C; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:24:58 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20060821071053.GC5178@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> <20060821071053.GC5178@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-2--403252636" Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Konstantin Saurbier Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:24:49 +0200 To: "Patrick M. Hausen" X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.2 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New Intel boards (was: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:25:00 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-2--403252636 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Hi! Am 21.08.2006 um 09:10 schrieb Patrick M. Hausen: > Hi, all! > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 04:03:47AM +0200, Konstantin Saurbier wrote: > >> This errors are not driver or OS dependent such as they appear on >> FreeBSD as well on different Linux distros. >> Since not all controllers suffering of these errors it is maybe >> depending on the firmware or board/chip revisions. > > We have two brand new TYAN B5161G20SH4 systems that feature > ICH7 controllers and SATA-hotplug-bays. One system is equipped > with two Seagate ST3160811AS drives, the other one with > WD1600YS-01SHB0 drives. > Both are configured with gmirror for slice 1. > > No problems at all after several days of "make -j4 buildworld". > > OTOH I can confirm that I got random "watchdog timeouts" > with the em driver. debug.mpsafenet=0 fixed the problem > for now. Sorry my post was way too unspecific. My response was only for Greg Byshenk and his 3ware related problem. They tend to loose drives oder mark drives as broken which are not broken at all. So his problems with 3ware are not related to this thread of ATA/ICH bugs. -- Best regards, Konstantin Saurbier ------------------------------------------------------ Konstantin Saurbier Tel.: 0521 106 3861 Computerlabor Mathematik U5-138 Universitaet Bielefeld Universitaetsstr.25 33501 Bielefeld email: saurbier@math.uni-bielefeld.de ------------------------------------------------------ --Apple-Mail-2--403252636 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: Signierter Teil der Nachricht content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) iD8DBQFE6V/FWkvQTx5k+y4RAvNOAJ995dq91Cr9YZraCxRVh+Qc1wp0MgCfYxNu e2pwu/yJPtoAMHsi7sUUu88= =+0FP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-2--403252636-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 07:27:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BF816A4DD for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:27:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perl@ebash.ru) Received: from mx1.caravan.ru (mx1.caravan.ru [217.23.130.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D03C43D5C for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:27:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from perl@ebash.ru) Received: from [217.23.131.8] (helo=[10.0.0.41]) by mx1.caravan.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1GF4CL-000JP2-Pb; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:27:49 +0400 Message-ID: <44E9628C.30005@ebash.ru> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:36:44 +0400 From: "Oleg D." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050517) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Johnnie References: <200608210915.27292.master_web@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: <200608210915.27292.master_web@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: test X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 07:27:04 -0000 Johnnie wrote: >test >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > test passed From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 08:37:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD1B16A4EB for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:37:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7FC143D55 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:36:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [10.0.0.110]) by kagate1.punkt.de with ESMTP id k7L8awLZ006635 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:36:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k7L8awa9040812; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:36:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93@hugo10.ka.punkt.de) Received: (from ry93@localhost) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id k7L8avkP040811; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:36:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:36:57 +0200 From: "Patrick M. Hausen" To: Pyun YongHyeon Message-ID: <20060821083657.GG5178@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> <20060821071053.GC5178@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <20060821072206.GA8029@cdnetworks.co.kr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060821072206.GA8029@cdnetworks.co.kr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: Konstantin Saurbier , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Greg Byshenk Subject: Re: New Intel boards (was: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:37:00 -0000 Hi, all! On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 04:22:06PM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > Several users reported em(4) watchdog errors but I couldn't reproduce > it on my system. A blind patch posted to net ML and I'd like to hear > success/failure report. > > See http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-August/011352.html > Make sure to enable "debug.mpsafenet=1" during testing. Testing ... stay tuned. Regards, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Vorholzstr. 25 Tel. 0721 9109 -0 Fax: -100 76137 Karlsruhe http://punkt.de From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 08:49:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E00016A4EF for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:49:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A693843D49 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:49:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so1490582wxd for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 01:49:19 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PNDBiwSvbbG61NCD7P1gxZBazXafWnnVPIbAoNrg93KTHQKLDTC8WDcoYi/5jMTqPZAQ5VbgZAN/BWLTGEGq2Wp+MFlhcxaXBb9gkKlgEyQTrkMzIU8+iNbqXky/EWLX8C3upcRzLcQAb0AFGla/eG+TQTZkx6TWkVu68nkHusg= Received: by 10.70.87.9 with SMTP id k9mr9228541wxb; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 01:49:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.49.3 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 01:49:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 01:49:18 -0700 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Dave Kingsley" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44E5C217.4080205@enc.edu> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RocketRAID 2224 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:49:22 -0000 On 8/18/06, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 8/18/06, Dave Kingsley wrote: > > I am attemping to use a RocketRAID 2224 8 channel card to set up a > > storage server. The server board is an Intel SE7230NH1-E with a P4-D > > 2.8GHz, 2GB RAM. > > FreeBSD doesn't see it at all. I've noticed that the kernel config has > > options built in for the RocketRAID 182x. > > Are there options I can add for the newer card? If so, will they work > > with FreeBSD 6.1 so that I can reconfigure for it rather than 6.0 that's > > running now? > > Basically we're trying to set up backups to disk with a RAID of about 4.5TB. > > > > FreeBSD has native support for the following: > $whatis highpoint > hptmv(4) - HighPoint RocketRAID 182x device driver > rr232x(4) - HighPoint RocketRAID 232x device driver > > You have have a 2224 so no. You will need to use HighPoint's FreeBSD > drivers. You can download everything from here: > http://www.highpoint-tech.com/USA/bios_rr2224.htm > > While your at it update your cards BIOS (if needed) and grab a copy of > "CLI FreeBSD v2.2", the RAID management utility. After you download > the driver and un-tar it use the rr222x-bsd-6.img file... It's > designed for FreeBSD 6.0 but works perfect on FreeBSD 6.1... Follow > the steps below, remember to change /dev/md0 if needed: > > This installs the device driver: > # mdconfig -a -t vnode -f rr222x-bsd-6.img > # mount /dev/md0 /mnt > # cp /mnt/hptmv6-6.0.ko /boot/modules/ > # echo 'hptmv6_load="yes"' >> /boot/loader.conf > > This installs the console management utility: > # pkg_add hptraidconf-2.2.tbz > # pkg_add hotsvr-3.12.tbz > > That's it, after you reboot everything will be working. You should > print out the pdf manual for the console management utility. If you > need more help just ask... I myself have an HPT 2220. > Sorry for the errors, here are the corrected steps: This installs the device driver: # mdconfig -a -t vnode -f rr222x-bsd-6.img # mount /dev/md0 /mnt # cp /mnt/hptmv6-6.0.ko /boot/modules/hptmv6.ko # echo 'hptmv6_load="YES"' >> /boot/loader.conf This installs the console management utility: # pkg_add hptsvr-3.12.tbz # pkg_add hptraidconf-2.2.tbz -- BSD Podcasts @: http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/ http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 09:16:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CE616A4E8 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:16:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE) Received: from ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (ms-2.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D2643D6E for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:16:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE) Received: from circe (circe.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.3.36]) by ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J4C005RLCG1J1@ms-dienst.rz.rwth-aachen.de> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:16:50 +0200 (MEST) Received: from talos.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE ([134.130.3.22]) by circe (MailMonitor for SMTP v1.2.2 ) ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:16:49 +0200 (MEST) Received: from bigboss.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de (bigspace.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.181.2]) by smarthost.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.7/8.13.1/1) with ESMTP id k7L9Gm6g022369; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:16:48 +0200 Received: from haakonia.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de ([137.226.181.92]) by bigboss.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1GF5tp-0005iI-8S; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:16:49 +0200 Received: by haakonia.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0894F3F40B; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:16:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:16:48 +0200 From: Christian Brueffer In-reply-to: To: Nikolas Britton Message-id: <20060821091648.GB1669@haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary="rS8CxjVDS/+yyDmU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE X-PGP-Key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D References: <2a41acea0606011523k462c8fedw3678558024d72191@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Jack Vogel Subject: Re: diffs to add newer Intel ATA and ICHSMB IDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:16:57 -0000 --rS8CxjVDS/+yyDmU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 07:55:31PM -0700, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 6/1/06, Jack Vogel wrote: > >I occasionally run into issues that newer PCI device IDs are > >not yet supported, these in particular are on a new box > >I am working on. Can someone see that these changes > >get integrated please :) > > > >Cheers, > > > >Jack > > > >--- dev/ata/ata-chipset.orig.c Fri Jun 2 05:39:18 2006 > >+++ dev/ata/ata-chipset.c Fri Jun 2 05:38:34 2006 > >@@ -1595,6 +1595,8 @@ > > { ATA_I82801GB_R1, 0, AHCI, 0x00, ATA_SA300, "ICH7" }, > > { ATA_I82801GB_M, 0, AHCI, 0x00, ATA_SA300, "ICH7" }, > > { ATA_I82801GB_AH, 0, AHCI, 0x00, ATA_SA300, "ICH7" }, > >+ { ATA_I631xESB, 0, 0, 0x00, ATA_UDMA5, "631xESB" }, > >+ { ATA_I631xESB_S1, 0, AHCI, 0x00, ATA_SA300, "631xESB" }, > > { ATA_I31244, 0, 0, 0x00, ATA_SA150, "31244" }, > > { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}}; > > char buffer[64]; > >--- dev/ata/ata-pci.orig.h Fri Jun 2 05:30:03 2006 > >+++ dev/ata/ata-pci.h Fri Jun 2 05:30:47 2006 > >@@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ > > #define ATA_I82801FB_S1 0x26518086 > > #define ATA_I82801FB_R1 0x26528086 > > #define ATA_I82801FB_M 0x26538086 > >+#define ATA_I631xESB_S1 0x26808086 > >+#define ATA_I631xESB 0x269e8086 > > #define ATA_I82801GB 0x27df8086 > > #define ATA_I82801GB_S1 0x27c08086 > > #define ATA_I82801GB_R1 0x27c38086 > >--- dev/ichsmb/ichsmb_pci.orig.c Fri Jun 2 05:17:21 2006 > >+++ dev/ichsmb/ichsmb_pci.c Fri Jun 2 05:20:04 2006 > >@@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ > > #define ID_82801DC 0x24C38086 > > #define ID_82801EB 0x24D38086 > > #define ID_6300ESB 0x25a48086 > >+#define ID_631xESB 0x269b8086 > > > > #define PCIS_SERIALBUS_SMBUS_PROGIF 0x00 > > > >@@ -145,6 +146,9 @@ > > break; > > case ID_6300ESB: > > device_set_desc(dev, "Intel 6300ESB (ICH) SMBus=20 > > controller"); > >+ break; > >+ case ID_631xESB: > >+ device_set_desc(dev, "Intel 631xESB (ESB2) SMBus=20 > >controller"); > > break; > > default: > > if (pci_get_class(dev) =3D=3D PCIC_SERIALBUS > >_______________________________________________ >=20 >=20 > Did this ever get commited? I have a Intel 5000p MCH + 6321ESB ICH and > onboard SATA is basically completely broken. If you hookup more then > one SATA drive it will hang the system at boot... I've played with > every setting in the BIOS... I'm Running 6-STABLE 200608180000. Would > this fix my problems? >=20 Not exactly the above patch, but a similar one: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c?rev=3D1= =2E169&content-type=3Dtext/x-cvsweb-markup This is likely to be MFCed before 6.2 gets released. - Christian --=20 Christian Brueffer chris@unixpages.org brueffer@FreeBSD.org GPG Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D --rS8CxjVDS/+yyDmU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE6XoAbHYXjKDtmC0RAtM4AKDsm8MZa0shA+vYCGMI8kjovzPv5wCg31t1 Z1r/r+nNMZHjm4pKxrjO3X4= =dQfN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rS8CxjVDS/+yyDmU-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 09:31:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D0A16A4DA for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:31:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from mailgate02.zdv.uni-mainz.de (mailgate02.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C761643D45 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:31:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@uni-mainz.de) Received: from exfront01.zdv.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.49]) by mailgate02.zdv.uni-mainz.de with ESMTP; 21 Aug 2006 11:31:23 +0200 Received: from mail.uni-mainz.de ([134.93.176.49]) by exfront01.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:31:23 +0200 Received: from [130.133.86.198] ([130.133.86.198] RDNS failed) by mail.uni-mainz.de over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:31:23 +0200 Message-ID: <44E97D6A.5090603@uni-mainz.de> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:31:22 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060731) MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <200608211212.34514.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200608211212.34514.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Aug 2006 09:31:23.0164 (UTC) FILETIME=[911AEDC0:01C6C504] Subject: ATA RAID stripesize, performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:31:26 -0000 A few weeks ago I changed harddrives and rebuilt a RAID 0 volume on nForce4-based RAID. Box runs under FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE as mst recent built-world. After reinitializing RAID, I recognized high performance penalty under heavy disk I/O. New drives in the mentioned RAID 0 array are both Hitachi T7K250 SATA II/300 drives. The drives prior to the change were a 200 GB Samsung SP2004C and a 200 GB Maxtor Diamond 10, SATA 150 (while Samsung was SATA 300). As I remember myself, the old RAID had a stripesize of 64 K and that was reported by kernel AND "atacontrol status ar0". Now I tried atacontrol on the new RAID 0 and it reported stripesize of 128K and I suspect the big stripesize of hitting performance. As far as I can rememeber, I never got above 64 KB stripesize on every RAID array (also many SCSI RAID 5 systems i built in the past with FreeBSD 4/5/6). BIOS of my ASUS A8N32-SLI Deluxe (AMI BIOS) offered me this stripesize as default without telling me the real size, it only said 'default' and I took it as the best known-and-evaluated-value. My question is: may it be performance boost changing back the stripesize back to 64KB per stripe or are there newer insights in increasing the stripesize depending on hardware and blocksizes? If 64 KB is still the best COMMON value, I will change back to 64 KB. Thanks, oh From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 09:43:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E214916A4E5 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:43:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from core.byshenk.net (core.byshenk.net [62.58.73.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5584A43D6A for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:42:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from core.byshenk.net (localhost.aoes.com [127.0.0.1]) by core.byshenk.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7L9gs2U060691; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:42:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from byshenknet@core.byshenk.net) Received: (from byshenknet@localhost) by core.byshenk.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k7L9gres060690; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:42:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from byshenknet) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:42:53 +0200 From: Greg Byshenk To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060821094253.GI633@core.byshenk.net> References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060820162032.GE633@core.byshenk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=failed version=3.1.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on core.byshenk.net Cc: Konstantin Saurbier Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:43:12 -0000 On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 04:03:47AM +0200, Konstantin Saurbier wrote: > Am 20.08.2006 um 18:20 schrieb Greg Byshenk: > >What is different is that this was with a 3Ware RAID controller -- > >which made removing/raconfiguring/rebuilding much easier -- but I was > >seeing the exact same errors. > No your errors are not related. As of my experience (and the > experience of others) the controller forgetting or loosing drives is > a "feature" 3ware. > We had similar problems with 3ware-7500-8 ATA controllers and i was > reported of the same errors with 3ware-9000 series. Our in-house > 3ware-9500S are not showing this kind of errors. > This errors are not driver or OS dependent such as they appear on > FreeBSD as well on different Linux distros. > Since not all controllers suffering of these errors it is maybe > depending on the firmware or board/chip revisions. I hesitate to make too strong a statement on this matter, as I have not done any deep investigation, however... The explanation above does not appear consistent with my experience. I am now using (and have used over the past several years) a number of different 3Ware controllers (7000, 8000, and 9000 series) and have not previously seen this problem. Of course I have had drives fail -- and in one case one port of one controller simply stopped working -- but never this particular problem. Further, the very same controller that demonstrated problems (in the numerically identical server, performing the exact same jobs), had not demonstrated this problem (over a period of more than six months) until I installed the June 6.1 STABLE, after which the problem appeared consistently, until installing the July 6.1 STABLE, at which point the problem disappeared, and has not occurred since (despite my trying very hard to make it do so). It may well be that there is some bug in the 3Ware controllers, but my experience suggests that there is/was something else going on. At the very least, it suggests that there was something about the June 6.1 STABLE (but not the earlier or later versions) that was triggering a 3Ware bug -- as my problems occurred only when running the June 6.1 STABLE, and that was the _only_ difference between the cases of having problems and those of not having problems. -- greg byshenk - gbyshenk@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 10:53:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C26316A4E5 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:53:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69EF743D69 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:53:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [10.0.0.110]) by kagate1.punkt.de with ESMTP id k7LArHUP007604 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:53:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k7LArGa9043864; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:53:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93@hugo10.ka.punkt.de) Received: (from ry93@localhost) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id k7LArGFi043863; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:53:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:53:16 +0200 From: "Patrick M. Hausen" To: Matt Dawson Message-ID: <20060821105316.GC41696@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> References: <20060820120049.06E0516A52F@hub.freebsd.org> <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608201338.56109.matt@chronos.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:53:20 -0000 Hi! On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 01:38:55PM +0100, Matt Dawson wrote: > I can confirm the same behaviour with a ULi M1689/Newcastle Athlon64 based > system running 6.1-RELEASE-p3 (i386). ad6 just detaches without warning and > it takes a reboot to bring it back. atacontrol reinit has no effect. Tried > the following to resolve the problems: I don't know what is supposed to be the canonical way to reattach a disconnected SATA drive, but while testing our new hardware and hot-pulling a drive while the system was running, atacaontrol reinit didn't find the reinserted drive here, either. atacontrol detach ata3; atacontrol attach ata3 did. HTH, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Vorholzstr. 25 Tel. 0721 9109 -0 Fax: -100 76137 Karlsruhe http://punkt.de From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 13:14:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73B916A4DE for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@chronos.org.uk) Received: from chronos.org.uk (chronos.org.uk [82.152.140.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4720943D5F for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:14:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@chronos.org.uk) Received: from [2001:618:400:6f4e:204:75ff:fe75:30d6] (md001@[IPv6:2001:618:400:6f4e:204:75ff:fe75:30d6]) (authenticated bits=0) by chronos.org.uk (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7LDEHSE084607 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:14:17 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matt@chronos.org.uk) From: Matt Dawson To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:14:16 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <20060821120052.0B25816A526@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060821120052.0B25816A526@hub.freebsd.org> X-Face: Zrm9At!%e{M_#Po+[-\; RFQih#L0/\!^6f8JS_1Nz,8`(@bR%|T,c)3:o6my`.sy$Rt)'^)ec9cWp!MmeH^Gp|Afl)BkcH1GENCBqb&wZ$cdqN27uYfD=jU@1:vWXf|)LmuVKo?1wuS68KeDX&3,#wZP2$N1Ao!_'mZOws67 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608211414.16731.matt@chronos.org.uk> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on central.local.chronos.org.uk X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/1696/Sun Aug 20 21:21:18 2006 on central.local.chronos.org.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:14:29 -0000 On Monday 21 August 2006 13:00, freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org wrote: > > I can confirm the same behaviour with a ULi M1689/Newcastle Athlon64 > > based system running 6.1-RELEASE-p3 (i386). ad6 just detaches without > > warning and it takes a reboot to bring it back. atacontrol reinit has no > > effect. Tried the following to resolve the problems: > > I don't know what is supposed to be the canonical way to > reattach a disconnected SATA drive, but while testing our > new hardware and hot-pulling a drive while the system > was running, atacaontrol reinit didn't find the reinserted drive > here, either. > > atacontrol detach ata3; atacontrol attach ata3 did. Yes, that is the method for a controlled remove and reattach, a la hotplug SATA. AIUI, though, if the drive goes AWOL on its own you need to reinit the channel before issuing an atacontrol attach foo. In theory... (man 8 atacontrol) In practice, the drive disappears, never to be probed again. A warm reboot without power down makes it appear again, so the drive itself isn't confused. FWIW, the problem takes *far* longer to rear its head when the SATA controller has a PCI INT and IRQ to itself. Put a NIC onto a shared slot (a very Bad Thing [TM] as the BIOS simply maps the INT to a single IRQ and both devices end up sharing it. Now tranfer a large file over the network and watch the ensuing hilarity) and it happens at least every couple of days. Now, with the slot shared with the SATA controller empty, I have six days uptime since the last event, which means I'm probably due one any time now. At least gmirror rebuilds the array after a simple reboot, but I would expect the dd operation to throw a wobbly if it's a timing issue/fight for interrupt between the two drives/channels. It doesn't, which makes me wonder if I'm barking up the wrong tree, but I can't help noticing that SATA channels have one interrupt between them whereas PATA channels have one each and all of these reports are from SATA users... I wonder what pciconf -lv shows on Miroslav's system? Is the SATA controller sharing an INT/IRQ with something else? Does moving that device to another slot alleviate the problem at all? Please not that Miroslav and I are using totally different drives, chipsets and processors. He's using, IIRC, an Intel chip with an ICH7 southbridge and Samsung drives. I'm using an AMD Athlon 64 Newcastle (running the i386 port) on a ULi M1689 chipset with WD RE2 drives so, although I'd be more than happy to be the numpty that is wrong and to have ata(4) vindicated by someone else, I suspect it is ata(4) that is the problem. However, finger pointing isn't productive and is certainly not fair given that ata(4) has been progressing so well. Anything else I can try to nail this irksome beast? Any suggestions for where I've been an idiot (easy, tiger!) and missed something obvious? BTW, this is a production server (DLT backed up nightly, so the data is safe) so I can't just pull it to bits. I do have an identical (CPU/mobo) box in the workshop as a workstation, however, which I could buy/borrow another drive for and set up gmirror to try things out. -- Matt Dawson. matt@chronos.org.uk MTD15-RIPE OpenNIC M_D9 MD51-6BONE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 13:18:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9027916A4DA; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:18:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE16543D55; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:18:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (ryjgxw@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7LDId6D032454; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:18:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id k7LDId9P032453; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:18:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:18:39 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200608211318.k7LDId9P032453@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, xiongfeng.tom@googlemail.com, dougb@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <44E81A55.30106@FreeBSD.org> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.8.0-20051224 ("Ronay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:18:44 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Subject: Re: make buildworld does nothing X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, xiongfeng.tom@googlemail.com, dougb@FreeBSD.ORG List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:18:46 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > Tom Hummel wrote: > > alright, it was bash :( stupid shell. > > Um, sorry, let's not blame the shell for the BCK (between chair and > keyboard) problem. Lots of us use bash as our everyday shell (for privileged > and unprivileged users) without the kinds of problems you described. The > first thing I do when I install a new freebsd machine is to change root's > shell to /bin/sh, and copy over my customized .profile which either execs > bash if it finds it, or sets up sh with my aliases, etc. That's what "su -m" is good for. No need to change root's login shell or to copy anything over. (Actually I even have an alias su="su -m" so it works automagically.) Best regards Oliver (zsh user) -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. > Can the denizens of this group enlighten me about what the > advantages of Python are, versus Perl ? "python" is more likely to pass unharmed through your spelling checker than "perl". -- An unknown poster and Fredrik Lundh From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 13:25:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF55D16A4DA for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:25:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9088C43D7E for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:25:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (ppp226-110.lns2.adl4.internode.on.net [203.122.226.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.5/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7LDPQW9050841 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:55:27 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:55:14 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <20060821120052.0B25816A526@hub.freebsd.org> <200608211414.16731.matt@chronos.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <200608211414.16731.matt@chronos.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2241712.hVTn1fjBur"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200608212255.22927.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -2.312 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: Matt Dawson , Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:25:53 -0000 --nextPart2241712.hVTn1fjBur Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 21 August 2006 22:44, Matt Dawson wrote: > > atacontrol detach ata3; atacontrol attach ata3 did. > > Yes, that is the method for a controlled remove and reattach, a la hotplug > SATA. AIUI, though, if the drive goes AWOL on its own you need to reinit > the channel before issuing an atacontrol attach foo. In theory... (man 8 > atacontrol) In practice, the drive disappears, never to be probed again. A > warm reboot without power down makes it appear again, so the drive itself > isn't confused. If you have a "proper" hot plug SATA controller you don't need to reinit=20 anything. When I was testing a Promise 2300 the act of plugging the drive in caused a= =20 new disk to show up (which was nice :) This did not happen on the VIA 8237 controller (which, by the way, has a=20 really really crappy RAID function, avoid at all costs). =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart2241712.hVTn1fjBur Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBE6bRC5ZPcIHs/zowRAisLAJ9Wo1auIvxDlGGvp1qRsUt0xtAI7wCeNTxV 89xMuN878rTLJd/YNqC65cY= =nciO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2241712.hVTn1fjBur-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 13:27:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C07F16A4E1 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:27:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E59743D53 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:27:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [10.0.0.110]) by kagate1.punkt.de with ESMTP id k7LDRi0l008779 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:27:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k7LDRha9048298; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:27:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93@hugo10.ka.punkt.de) Received: (from ry93@localhost) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id k7LDRhuj048297; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:27:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:27:43 +0200 From: "Patrick M. Hausen" To: Matt Dawson Message-ID: <20060821132743.GC45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> References: <20060821120052.0B25816A526@hub.freebsd.org> <200608211414.16731.matt@chronos.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608211414.16731.matt@chronos.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:27:46 -0000 Hello! On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 02:14:16PM +0100, Matt Dawson wrote: > FWIW, the problem takes *far* longer to rear its head when the SATA controller > has a PCI INT and IRQ to itself. Put a NIC onto a shared slot (a very Bad > Thing [TM] as the BIOS simply maps the INT to a single IRQ and both devices > end up sharing it. Now tranfer a large file over the network and watch the > ensuing hilarity) and it happens at least every couple of days. Now, with the > slot shared with the SATA controller empty, I have six days uptime since the > last event, which means I'm probably due one any time now. FWIW - here's the setup of my systems that have not shown the problem so far: Device IRQ ------ --- em0 16 em1 17 uhci0 23 uhci1 19 uhci2 18 uhci3 16 ehci0 23 fxp0 16 atapci1 19 This is the SATA300 controller Is there a method to force the controller to share its IRQ with, say, em0 for testing? Regards, Patrick M. Hausen Leiter Netzwerke und Sicherheit -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Vorholzstr. 25 Tel. 0721 9109 -0 Fax: -100 76137 Karlsruhe http://punkt.de From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 13:39:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E9816A4DD for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:39:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk) Received: from mailhost.graphdata.co.uk (mailhost.graphdata.co.uk [195.12.22.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D631D43D76 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:39:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.graphdata.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3403E11402F; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:39:02 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at graphdata.co.uk Received: from mailhost.graphdata.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailhost.graphdata.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WvllIMK7NKg8; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:38:57 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.0.86] (gdc083.internal.graphdata.co.uk [192.168.0.86]) by mailhost.graphdata.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF281114026; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:38:57 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <44E9B771.3080604@goodforbusiness.co.uk> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:38:57 +0100 From: Dominic Marks User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060809) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Patrick M. Hausen" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20060821120052.0B25816A526@hub.freebsd.org> <200608211414.16731.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060821132743.GC45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> In-Reply-To: <20060821132743.GC45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:39:04 -0000 Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hello! > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 02:14:16PM +0100, Matt Dawson wrote: > >> FWIW, the problem takes *far* longer to rear its head when the SATA controller >> has a PCI INT and IRQ to itself. Put a NIC onto a shared slot (a very Bad >> Thing [TM] as the BIOS simply maps the INT to a single IRQ and both devices >> end up sharing it. Now tranfer a large file over the network and watch the >> ensuing hilarity) and it happens at least every couple of days. Now, with the >> slot shared with the SATA controller empty, I have six days uptime since the >> last event, which means I'm probably due one any time now. > > FWIW - here's the setup of my systems that have not shown the > problem so far: > > Device IRQ > ------ --- > > em0 16 > em1 17 > uhci0 23 > uhci1 19 > uhci2 18 > uhci3 16 > ehci0 23 > fxp0 16 > atapci1 19 This is the SATA300 controller > > Is there a method to force the controller to share its IRQ with, > say, em0 for testing? You can use device.hints(5) to do this. I have the following in mine to force a RAID card and Sound card to share IRQ 17. You need to modify it to suit your environment. hw.pci3.13.INTA.irq="17" The `13' value is the device number, you can find this in dmesg, same for pciN. HTH, Dominic > Regards, > > Patrick M. Hausen > Leiter Netzwerke und Sicherheit From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 13:40:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AEC16A4E5 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:40:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk) Received: from mailhost.graphdata.co.uk (mailhost.graphdata.co.uk [195.12.22.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC9E43D53 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:40:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.graphdata.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70D53114037; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:40:17 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at graphdata.co.uk Received: from mailhost.graphdata.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailhost.graphdata.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iWGFyWf9KDwg; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:40:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.0.86] (gdc083.internal.graphdata.co.uk [192.168.0.86]) by mailhost.graphdata.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8FE114032; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:40:17 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <44E9B7C1.9010708@goodforbusiness.co.uk> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:40:17 +0100 From: Dominic Marks User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060809) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Patrick M. Hausen" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20060821120052.0B25816A526@hub.freebsd.org> <200608211414.16731.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060821132743.GC45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> In-Reply-To: <20060821132743.GC45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:40:18 -0000 Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hello! > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 02:14:16PM +0100, Matt Dawson wrote: > >> FWIW, the problem takes *far* longer to rear its head when the SATA controller >> has a PCI INT and IRQ to itself. Put a NIC onto a shared slot (a very Bad >> Thing [TM] as the BIOS simply maps the INT to a single IRQ and both devices >> end up sharing it. Now tranfer a large file over the network and watch the >> ensuing hilarity) and it happens at least every couple of days. Now, with the >> slot shared with the SATA controller empty, I have six days uptime since the >> last event, which means I'm probably due one any time now. > > FWIW - here's the setup of my systems that have not shown the > problem so far: > > Device IRQ > ------ --- > > em0 16 > em1 17 > uhci0 23 > uhci1 19 > uhci2 18 > uhci3 16 > ehci0 23 > fxp0 16 > atapci1 19 This is the SATA300 controller > > Is there a method to force the controller to share its IRQ with, > say, em0 for testing? You can use device.hints(5) to do this. I have the following in mine to force a RAID card and Sound card to share IRQ 17. You need to modify it to suit your environment. hw.pci3.13.INTA.irq="17" The `13' value is the device number, you can find this in dmesg, same for pciN. HTH, Dominic > Regards, > > Patrick M. Hausen > Leiter Netzwerke und Sicherheit From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 13:57:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B759916A4E0 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:57:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ah@crypta.net) Received: from mail.crypta.net (mail.crypta.net [83.136.131.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B4943D46 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:57:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ah@crypta.net) Received: by mail.crypta.net (cryptobank/eProtect-smtpd, from userid 1001) id 21BB9ECD4AB; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:53:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:53:18 +0200 From: Andy Hilker To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060821135318.GA12255@mail.crypta.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-PGP-Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEC6E1071 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9B2E 5892 AD93 D5C5 FB8E 3912 35D6 951B EC6E 1071 Organization: cryptobank - Andy Hilker Subject: device carp / freebsd-update X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:57:35 -0000 Hi, we are currently migrating our hosts to 6.1-RELEASE with official binaries (from CD). This is because we want to make use of freebsd-update binary patches. Our problem is that GENERIC kernel does not contain "device carp". Is there any posibility to use carp without "device carp" in GENERIC e.g. with /boot/loader.conf like other pseudo devices? Any idea? bye, Andy From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 14:12:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD13116A4E2 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EB643D70 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:12:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [88.64.182.129] (helo=amd64.laiers.local) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu6) with ESMTP (Nemesis), id 0ML29c-1GFAVt327j-0002VN; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:12:25 +0200 From: Max Laier Organization: FreeBSD To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:12:17 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <20060821135318.GA12255@mail.crypta.net> In-Reply-To: <20060821135318.GA12255@mail.crypta.net> X-Face: ,,8R(x[kmU]tKN@>gtH1yQE4aslGdu+2]; R]*pL,U>^H?)gW@49@wdJ`H<=?utf-8?q?=25=7D*=5FBD=0A=09U=5For=3D=5CmOZf764=26nYj=3DJYbR1PW0ud?=>|!~,,CPC.1-D$FG@0h3#'5"k{V]a~.<=?utf-8?q?mZ=7D44=23Se=7Em=0A=09Fe=7E=5C=5DX5B=5D=5Fxj?=(ykz9QKMw_l0C2AQ]}Ym8)fU MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1313234.ZObVffZ0H5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200608211612.22931.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:61c499deaeeba3ba5be80f48ecc83056 Cc: Andy Hilker Subject: Re: device carp / freebsd-update X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:12:29 -0000 --nextPart1313234.ZObVffZ0H5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hello Andy, On Monday 21 August 2006 15:53, Andy Hilker wrote: > we are currently migrating our hosts to 6.1-RELEASE with official > binaries (from CD). This is because we want to make use of > freebsd-update binary patches. > > Our problem is that GENERIC kernel does not contain "device carp". > Is there any posibility to use carp without "device carp" in GENERIC > e.g. with /boot/loader.conf like other pseudo devices? No, there is no such possibility. The reason for this, is that carp(4)=20 has to register a protocol which cannot be (easily) done on-the-fly. =20 Since you should have a fail-over running it shouldn't be a problem to=20 build a carp enabled backup while the failover host takes care of the=20 service, however. As a fallback there is a userland implementaion of carp (google "ucarp"),=20 but I am not sure what the status of that is or if it works with the=20 in-kernel version. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart1313234.ZObVffZ0H5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBE6b9GXyyEoT62BG0RArFVAJ0eipQQSOrM6IJ1clbGAdwB+CSPJwCfc+rz nH+u6bHwYkAKtdVVsxq+2Qc= =qPM9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1313234.ZObVffZ0H5-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 14:26:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0788116A4DA for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:26:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E2843DD2 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:26:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [10.0.0.110]) by kagate1.punkt.de with ESMTP id k7LEQEPb009219 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:26:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k7LEQEa9049951; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:26:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93@hugo10.ka.punkt.de) Received: (from ry93@localhost) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id k7LEQDNb049950; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:26:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:26:13 +0200 From: "Patrick M. Hausen" To: Dominic Marks Message-ID: <20060821142613.GI45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> References: <20060821120052.0B25816A526@hub.freebsd.org> <200608211414.16731.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060821132743.GC45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <44E9B7C1.9010708@goodforbusiness.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44E9B7C1.9010708@goodforbusiness.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:26:44 -0000 Hi, Dominic! On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 02:40:17PM +0100, Dominic Marks wrote: > hw.pci3.13.INTA.irq="17" > > The `13' value is the device number, you can find this in dmesg, same > for pciN. So I tried this: em1: port 0x5000-0x501f mem 0xdc180000-0xdc19ffff,0xdc100000-0xdc17ffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci5 atapci1: port 0x30e8-0x30ef,0x30dc-0x30df,0x30e0-0x30e7,0x30d8-0x30db,0x30b0-0x30bf mem 0xdc500400-0xdc5007ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 hw.pci0.31.2.INTA.irq="17" to force atapci1 to the same irq as em1. Didn't work. It's still using 19. Any hints? Thanks, Patrick M. Hausen Leiter Netzwerke und Sicherheit -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Vorholzstr. 25 Tel. 0721 9109 -0 Fax: -100 76137 Karlsruhe http://punkt.de From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 14:42:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FCE16A4DD for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:42:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk) Received: from mailhost.graphdata.co.uk (mailhost.graphdata.co.uk [195.12.22.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D20A43E3E for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:40:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dom@goodforbusiness.co.uk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhost.graphdata.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE0D114026; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:39:53 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at graphdata.co.uk Received: from mailhost.graphdata.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mailhost.graphdata.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zee+TWzsVMSc; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:39:47 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.0.86] (gdc083.internal.graphdata.co.uk [192.168.0.86]) by mailhost.graphdata.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8ACA114023; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:39:47 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <44E9C5B3.90604@goodforbusiness.co.uk> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:39:47 +0100 From: Dominic Marks User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060809) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Patrick M. Hausen" References: <20060821120052.0B25816A526@hub.freebsd.org> <200608211414.16731.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060821132743.GC45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <44E9B7C1.9010708@goodforbusiness.co.uk> <20060821142613.GI45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> In-Reply-To: <20060821142613.GI45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:42:24 -0000 Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hi, Dominic! > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 02:40:17PM +0100, Dominic Marks wrote: > >> hw.pci3.13.INTA.irq="17" >> >> The `13' value is the device number, you can find this in dmesg, same >> for pciN. > > So I tried this: > > em1: port 0x5000-0x501f mem 0xdc180000-0xdc19ffff,0xdc100000-0xdc17ffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci5 > atapci1: port 0x30e8-0x30ef,0x30dc-0x30df,0x30e0-0x30e7,0x30d8-0x30db,0x30b0-0x30bf mem 0xdc500400-0xdc5007ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 > > hw.pci0.31.2.INTA.irq="17" > > to force atapci1 to the same irq as em1. Didn't work. It's > still using 19. Any hints? I myself only learnt about this relatively recently, so afraid not. Have you checked that it doesnt work if you use hw.pci5 I'm just guessing here, but it might be worth a shot. Cheers, Dominic > Thanks, > > Patrick M. Hausen > Leiter Netzwerke und Sicherheit From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 14:53:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A15016A4DD for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:53:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BD643D82 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:53:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [10.0.0.110]) by kagate1.punkt.de with ESMTP id k7LErTKK009411 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:53:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k7LErSa9050596 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:53:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93@hugo10.ka.punkt.de) Received: (from ry93@localhost) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id k7LErS5K050595 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:53:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:53:28 +0200 From: "Patrick M. Hausen" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060821145328.GL45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> References: <20060821120052.0B25816A526@hub.freebsd.org> <200608211414.16731.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060821132743.GC45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <44E9B7C1.9010708@goodforbusiness.co.uk> <20060821142613.GI45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <44E9C5B3.90604@goodforbusiness.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44E9C5B3.90604@goodforbusiness.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Subject: ICH7 SATA and em interrupt sharing X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:53:31 -0000 Hi, folks! Seems finally I am able to reproduce part of the problems some people see with their hardware. I used device.hints to force em0 to share its irq with atapci1 - the SATA300 controller in my machine. atapci1: port 0x30e8-0x30ef,0x30dc-0x30df,0x30e0-0x30e7,0x30d8-0x30db,0x30b0-0x30bf mem 0xdc500400-0xdc5007ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 em0: port 0x4000-0x401f mem 0xdc080000-0xdc09ffff,0xdc000000-0xdc07ffff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci4 And pronto: em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! And the system is really sluggish when used via SSH over that NIC. I've yet to provoke the "detached disk" problem, though. Other data that may be of interest: 6-STABLE as of Friday. This patch applied: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2006-August/011352.html debug.mpsafenet="1" HTH, Patrick M. Hausen Leiter Netzwerke und Sicherheit -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Vorholzstr. 25 Tel. 0721 9109 -0 Fax: -100 76137 Karlsruhe http://punkt.de From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 15:07:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0418916A4DE for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:07:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578EE43D73 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:07:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [10.0.0.110]) by kagate1.punkt.de with ESMTP id k7LF7jMI009486 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:07:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k7LF7ia9050933; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:07:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93@hugo10.ka.punkt.de) Received: (from ry93@localhost) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id k7LF7iGU050932; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:07:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:07:44 +0200 From: "Patrick M. Hausen" To: "Patrick M. Hausen" Message-ID: <20060821150744.GN45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> References: <20060821120052.0B25816A526@hub.freebsd.org> <200608211414.16731.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060821132743.GC45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <44E9B7C1.9010708@goodforbusiness.co.uk> <20060821142613.GI45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <44E9C5B3.90604@goodforbusiness.co.uk> <20060821145328.GL45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060821145328.GL45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ICH7 SATA and em interrupt sharing X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:07:48 -0000 Again ... On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 04:53:28PM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Seems finally I am able to reproduce part of the problems > some people see with their hardware. > > I used device.hints to force em0 to share its irq > with atapci1 - the SATA300 controller in my machine. > > atapci1: port 0x30e8-0x30ef,0x30dc-0x30df,0x30e0-0x30e7,0x30d8-0x30db,0x30b0-0x30bf mem 0xdc500400-0xdc5007ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 > em0: port 0x4000-0x401f mem 0xdc080000-0xdc09ffff,0xdc000000-0xdc07ffff irq 19 at device 0.0 on pci4 > > And pronto: > > em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! > em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! > em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! > em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! > em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! > em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! > > And the system is really sluggish when used via SSH over that NIC. > I've yet to provoke the "detached disk" problem, though. make -j4 buildworld and ... *boom* ad6: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying ... ad4: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying ... HTH, Patrick M. Hausen Leiter Netzwerke und Sicherheit -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Vorholzstr. 25 Tel. 0721 9109 -0 Fax: -100 76137 Karlsruhe http://punkt.de From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 15:43:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6D816A4DA for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fydernix@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD3B43D55 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:43:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fydernix@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 70so250610wra for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:42:59 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=i67UMAWhHcN/CBw/wercEBAgSrwCnn0OGA9/jpTPXtfulOo8+uDQnuItJA4z7cYVSL7Vf5I03olYd44oG4V6+Uyz41fwM5aSfMim89snrt8eYQoUDuVhsGzwDFuQifezZRJON8FqSqkZRRGHxqM6jjpvaJKFykyLwC4BGQgbLs4= Received: by 10.90.100.2 with SMTP id x2mr202387agb; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:42:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.118.4 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 08:42:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 11:42:59 -0400 From: "SigmaX asdf" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: IPFW rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:43:01 -0000 I'm trying to setup IPFW to block all ports except those I specify. For starters I'm just opening SSH. # ipfw list 00050 divert 8668 ip4 from any to any via rl0 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any 00301 allow log tcp from any to any dst-port 22 00399 deny ip from any to any 65000 allow ip from any to any 65535 deny ip from any to any Traffic is still blocked on port 22 -- I can't login via SSH. What am I doing wrong, and what rule should I be using to allow SSH in and through? SigmaX From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 16:18:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E19E16A4E2 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:18:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ah@cryptobank.de) Received: from mail.crypta.net (mail.crypta.net [83.136.131.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A84443D9B for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:18:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ah@cryptobank.de) Received: by mail.crypta.net (cryptobank/eProtect-smtpd, from userid 1001) id E9EE0ECD4C7; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:14:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:14:28 +0200 From: Andy Hilker To: Max Laier Message-ID: <20060821161428.GA20152@mail.crypta.net> References: <20060821135318.GA12255@mail.crypta.net> <200608211612.22931.max@love2party.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608211612.22931.max@love2party.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-PGP-Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEC6E1071 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9B2E 5892 AD93 D5C5 FB8E 3912 35D6 951B EC6E 1071 Organization: cryptobank - Andy Hilker Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: device carp / freebsd-update X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:18:50 -0000 --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Max, You (Max Laier) wrote: > On Monday 21 August 2006 15:53, Andy Hilker wrote: > > we are currently migrating our hosts to 6.1-RELEASE with official > > binaries (from CD). This is because we want to make use of > > freebsd-update binary patches. > > > > Our problem is that GENERIC kernel does not contain "device carp". > > Is there any posibility to use carp without "device carp" in GENERIC > > e.g. with /boot/loader.conf like other pseudo devices? >=20 > No, there is no such possibility. The reason for this, is that carp(4)= =20 > has to register a protocol which cannot be (easily) done on-the-fly. =20 > Since you should have a fail-over running it shouldn't be a problem to=20 > build a carp enabled backup while the failover host takes care of the=20 > service, however. The problem is: we have to use a custom kernel, but currently we try to use freebsd-update, which is not useable with custom kernels. > As a fallback there is a userland implementaion of carp (google "ucarp"),= =20 > but I am not sure what the status of that is or if it works with the=20 > in-kernel version. We tested it already. It seems to work fine with 2 ucarp nodes, but fyi ucarp and kernel carp does not work together (i did not found out why). So we will test the ucarp more deeply and maybe switch our carp system to ucarp :( Maybe in future we can try to built our own binary diffs for freebsd-update. Then we can make use of custom compiled worlds+kernels. But this needs a "freebsd-update-built-server" and more custom work on our side. bye, Andy --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE6dvkNdaVG+xuEHERAtYRAJ96PUif2JZstfb3mRXtGBjK7Rl8ZgCgisxe 5WuSNlYUqNKr+CDOsyjFFmU= =+vX9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 16:19:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6070316A4ED for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:19:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAADD43D7C for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:19:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.4) with SMTP id CAA05160 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:19:26 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:19:25 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Subject: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:19:49 -0000 Hello -stable ones, I recently (without drama) upgraded a 5.4-RELEASE system to FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #1: Tue Aug 1 11:11:20 EST 2006 for 'target practice' at least, on the way to 6.1-STABLE I was preparing to portupgrade everything next, when I wondered: a) should I upgrade from RELENG_5 straight to RELENG_6 or should I be stopping off at 6.1-RELEASE along the way first? and b) do I need to upgrade all existing ports (way out of date) before the source upgrade, or can I be confident of doing that from 6.1 (-R or -S)? FWIW: a wee Celeron 300, so minimising upgrade build times is desirable. Cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 16:36:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD7916A4E0 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:36:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A5643D5C for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:36:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout01/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k7LGapui007139; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:36:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [17.214.14.142] (a17-214-14-142.apple.com [17.214.14.142]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin07/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k7LGaiJL022248; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:36:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <6C13FDA0-DAE2-4470-8FF6-E7955C637249@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 09:36:43 -0700 To: SigmaX asdf X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAA+k= X-Language-Identified: TRUE Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gateway [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:36:56 -0000 On Aug 19, 2006, at 10:58 PM, SigmaX asdf wrote: > Found my problem. T[h]e firewall_type option is case sensitive -- > and "OPEN" > is supposed to be lowercase. The firewall_type option isn't case-sensitive, and hasn't been since early 4.x; see /etc/rc.firewall: case ${firewall_type} in [Oo][Pp][Ee][Nn]) setup_loopback ${fwcmd} add 65000 pass all from any to any ;; -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 17:15:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3F616A4E0 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:15:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@jellydonut.org) Received: from mail.secureworks.net (mail.secureworks.net [65.114.32.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 278C643D60 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:15:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@jellydonut.org) Received: (qmail 27679 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2006 17:15:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.14.135?) (63.239.86.253) by 0 with SMTP; 21 Aug 2006 17:15:05 -0000 Message-ID: <44E9EA19.5040509@jellydonut.org> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 13:15:05 -0400 From: Michael Proto User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060730) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: SigmaX asdf References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:15:42 -0000 SigmaX asdf wrote: > I'm trying to setup IPFW to block all ports except those I specify. > For starters I'm just opening SSH. > > # ipfw list > 00050 divert 8668 ip4 from any to any via rl0 > 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > 00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > 00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > 00301 allow log tcp from any to any dst-port 22 > 00399 deny ip from any to any > 65000 allow ip from any to any > 65535 deny ip from any to any > > Traffic is still blocked on port 22 -- I can't login via SSH. What am > I doing wrong, and what rule should I be using to allow SSH in and > through? > You need to allow the return traffic. Either something like: ipfw add 1 allow tcp from any to any established or: ipfw add 1 check-state and change your port 22 rule to read ipfw allow log tcp from any to any port 22 keep-state (check the ipfw(8) man page to be sure, I haven't touched ipfw rules in a long time and my above syntax may be a bit buggy) -Proto From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 17:21:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C67216A4DF for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:21:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx24.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CCF5B43D5A for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:21:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 27735 invoked by uid 399); 21 Aug 2006 17:21:09 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Aug 2006 17:21:09 -0000 Message-ID: <44E9EB82.7010104@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 10:21:06 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060729) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, xiongfeng.tom@googlemail.com, dougb@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200608211318.k7LDId9P032453@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: <200608211318.k7LDId9P032453@lurza.secnetix.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: make buildworld does nothing X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:21:16 -0000 Oliver Fromme wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > > Tom Hummel wrote: > > > alright, it was bash :( stupid shell. > > > > Um, sorry, let's not blame the shell for the BCK (between chair and > > keyboard) problem. Lots of us use bash as our everyday shell (for privileged > > and unprivileged users) without the kinds of problems you described. The > > first thing I do when I install a new freebsd machine is to change root's > > shell to /bin/sh, and copy over my customized .profile which either execs > > bash if it finds it, or sets up sh with my aliases, etc. > > That's what "su -m" is good for. There are actually some things in root's environment that I want to be different, so that doesn't work for me. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 17:36:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4421916A4DE for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:36:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from mail-gw4.york.ac.uk (mail-gw4.york.ac.uk [144.32.128.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C885243D6A for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:36:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from buffy.york.ac.uk (buffy-128.york.ac.uk [144.32.128.160]) by mail-gw4.york.ac.uk (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7LHZthN027690; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:35:55 +0100 (BST) Received: from buffy.york.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by buffy.york.ac.uk (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7LHZqnp005961; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:35:52 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: (from ga9@localhost) by buffy.york.ac.uk (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k7LHZmGJ005959; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:35:48 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: buffy.york.ac.uk: ga9 set sender to gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk using -f From: Gavin Atkinson To: Andy Hilker In-Reply-To: <20060821161428.GA20152@mail.crypta.net> References: <20060821135318.GA12255@mail.crypta.net> <200608211612.22931.max@love2party.net> <20060821161428.GA20152@mail.crypta.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:35:47 +0100 Message-Id: <1156181747.4356.37.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-York-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-York-MailScanner-From: gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk Cc: Max Laier , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: device carp / freebsd-update X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 17:36:07 -0000 On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 18:14 +0200, Andy Hilker wrote: > Hi Max, > > You (Max Laier) wrote: > > On Monday 21 August 2006 15:53, Andy Hilker wrote: > > > we are currently migrating our hosts to 6.1-RELEASE with official > > > binaries (from CD). This is because we want to make use of > > > freebsd-update binary patches. [ snip ] > > As a fallback there is a userland implementaion of carp (google "ucarp"), > > but I am not sure what the status of that is or if it works with the > > in-kernel version. > > We tested it already. It seems to work fine with 2 ucarp nodes, but > fyi ucarp and kernel carp does not work together (i did not found > out why). So we will test the ucarp more deeply and maybe switch > our carp system to ucarp :( I don't suppose there's any chance you know if ucarp works with 6.1-RELEASE and IPv6? This is the one thing stopping me moving my machines to 6.1-RELEASE. If you don't know, then you've given me yet another thing to add to my todo list! Gavin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 19:07:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CF316A4DF for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:07:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A138443D6E for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:07:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so2518809pye for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:07:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=D9I1dkbc2fTgK8CoqxxvNr5o6F11akY4cC08bSWdgnUi5ec84vhihySerUUFjI/+M2oO5tNqgPUyB3DZoG6y0GN7uZ3eNElVLMT72tKVemYQzy7a5vrCxGQW7ViJsfZLNUdnNN5bpJgrvNNnXcbLVQsUoXshSnUAcCJ28GpRFpA= Received: by 10.35.123.10 with SMTP id a10mr13904672pyn; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:07:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.119.1 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:07:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2a41acea0608211207g3b23ec15x9cad496edd7ad818@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:07:06 -0700 From: "Jack Vogel" To: "Christian Brueffer" In-Reply-To: <20060821091648.GB1669@haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <2a41acea0606011523k462c8fedw3678558024d72191@mail.gmail.com> <20060821091648.GB1669@haakonia.hitnet.RWTH-Aachen.DE> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Nikolas Britton Subject: Re: diffs to add newer Intel ATA and ICHSMB IDs X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:07:10 -0000 On 8/21/06, Christian Brueffer wrote: > Not exactly the above patch, but a similar one: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c?rev=1.169&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup > > This is likely to be MFCed before 6.2 gets released. Oh, this is great news, thanks. Our test group just ran into an odd problem which I think is traced back to this, so being in 6.2 will be helpful :) Jack From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 19:23:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6347816A4DD for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:23:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dgilbert@daveg.ca) Received: from ox.eicat.ca (ox.eicat.ca [66.96.30.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C55243D69 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:23:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dgilbert@daveg.ca) Received: by ox.eicat.ca (Postfix, from userid 66) id EF2CA2007A; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:23:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: by canoe.dclg.ca (Postfix, from userid 101) id EAA744AC2B; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:23:37 -0400 (EDT) From: David Gilbert MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17642.2105.391443.137742@canoe.dclg.ca> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:23:37 -0400 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 19) "Constant Variable" XEmacs Lucid Subject: /sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c 1.168 MFC? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:23:37 -0000 Could someone please MFC at least v 1.168 of ata-chipset.c into RELENG_6? Specifically the Nvidia NFORCE-4 support? Most of the AMD64 motherboards I've gotten lately require this patch. I have been able to apply diff between 1.165 and 1.168 to RELENG-6 and it makes the chipset work. (this also requires 1.65 to 1.68 of ata-pci.h). Any takers? Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 19:24:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD55E16A4DE for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:24:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ah@cryptobank.de) Received: from mail.crypta.net (mail.crypta.net [83.136.131.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8B543D70 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:24:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ah@cryptobank.de) Received: by mail.crypta.net (cryptobank/eProtect-smtpd, from userid 1001) id A9B01ECD57F; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:19:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:19:51 +0200 From: Andy Hilker To: Gavin Atkinson Message-ID: <20060821191951.GA32807@mail.crypta.net> References: <20060821135318.GA12255@mail.crypta.net> <200608211612.22931.max@love2party.net> <20060821161428.GA20152@mail.crypta.net> <1156181747.4356.37.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1156181747.4356.37.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-PGP-Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEC6E1071 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9B2E 5892 AD93 D5C5 FB8E 3912 35D6 951B EC6E 1071 Organization: cryptobank - Andy Hilker Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: device carp / freebsd-update X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:24:14 -0000 You (Gavin Atkinson) wrote: [...] > I don't suppose there's any chance you know if ucarp works with > 6.1-RELEASE and IPv6? This is the one thing stopping me moving my > machines to 6.1-RELEASE. > > If you don't know, then you've given me yet another thing to add to my > todo list! No, sorry, I have not tested it. But maybe the kernel carp? bye, Andy From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 19:30:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B033F16A4DE for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:30:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from slimak.dkm.cz (slimak.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC82343D5C for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:30:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: (qmail 37195 invoked by uid 0); 21 Aug 2006 19:30:52 -0000 Received: from grimm.quip.cz (HELO ?192.168.1.2?) (213.220.192.218) by slimak.dkm.cz with SMTP; 21 Aug 2006 19:30:52 -0000 Message-ID: <44EA09EC.5000605@quip.cz> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:30:52 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: cs, cz, en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Dawson References: <20060821120052.0B25816A526@hub.freebsd.org> <200608211414.16731.matt@chronos.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <200608211414.16731.matt@chronos.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:30:58 -0000 Matt Dawson wrote: > On Monday 21 August 2006 13:00, freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org wrote: > >>>I can confirm the same behaviour with a ULi M1689/Newcastle Athlon64 >>>based system running 6.1-RELEASE-p3 (i386). ad6 just detaches without >>>warning and it takes a reboot to bring it back. atacontrol reinit has no >>>effect. Tried the following to resolve the problems: >> >>I don't know what is supposed to be the canonical way to >>reattach a disconnected SATA drive, but while testing our >>new hardware and hot-pulling a drive while the system >>was running, atacaontrol reinit didn't find the reinserted drive >>here, either. >> >>atacontrol detach ata3; atacontrol attach ata3 did. > > > Yes, that is the method for a controlled remove and reattach, a la hotplug > SATA. AIUI, though, if the drive goes AWOL on its own you need to reinit the > channel before issuing an atacontrol attach foo. In theory... (man 8 > atacontrol) In practice, the drive disappears, never to be probed again. A > warm reboot without power down makes it appear again, so the drive itself > isn't confused. This is same in my case. > FWIW, the problem takes *far* longer to rear its head when the SATA controller > has a PCI INT and IRQ to itself. Put a NIC onto a shared slot (a very Bad > Thing [TM] as the BIOS simply maps the INT to a single IRQ and both devices > end up sharing it. Now tranfer a large file over the network and watch the > ensuing hilarity) and it happens at least every couple of days. Now, with the > slot shared with the SATA controller empty, I have six days uptime since the > last event, which means I'm probably due one any time now. I thought so, but it did not solve my problem. I had UHCI sharing same IRQ with SATA (both on irq 19). Instead of playing with device.hints(5), I disabled all unused peripheries in BIOS (USB ports, LPT port, FDD...) After few days, system reports next disk lose. > At least gmirror rebuilds the array after a simple reboot, but I would expect > the dd operation to throw a wobbly if it's a timing issue/fight for interrupt > between the two drives/channels. It doesn't, which makes me wonder if I'm > barking up the wrong tree, but I can't help noticing that SATA channels have > one interrupt between them whereas PATA channels have one each and all of > these reports are from SATA users... Maybe you are right, I don't saw any report with one disk machine. All problems comes from machines with 2 or more SATA disks. > I wonder what pciconf -lv shows on Miroslav's system? Is the SATA controller > sharing an INT/IRQ with something else? Does moving that device to another > slot alleviate the problem at all? SATA is no longer sharing IRQs, but problem persists. system dmesg after verbose boot http://www.quip.cz/1/freebsd/asus_rs120-e3/track_dmesg_verbose_2006-08-21.txt pciconf -lv http://www.quip.cz/1/freebsd/asus_rs120-e3/track_pciconf_2006-08-21.txt Mentioned problem appeared only on heavy disk load (e.g. ports tree copy). I have 3rd system with minimal disk load running for 10 days without problem (FreeBSD 6.0, now in production for mentioned 10 days - machine is "quick replacement" of failed server, system mirrored from old disks to new by dump & restore) > Please not that Miroslav and I are using totally different drives, chipsets > and processors. He's using, IIRC, an Intel chip with an ICH7 southbridge and > Samsung drives. I'm using an AMD Athlon 64 Newcastle (running the i386 port) > on a ULi M1689 chipset with WD RE2 drives so, although I'd be more than happy > to be the numpty that is wrong and to have ata(4) vindicated by someone else, > I suspect it is ata(4) that is the problem. However, finger pointing isn't > productive and is certainly not fair given that ata(4) has been progressing > so well. Anything else I can try to nail this irksome beast? Any suggestions > for where I've been an idiot (easy, tiger!) and missed something obvious? > > BTW, this is a production server (DLT backed up nightly, so the data is safe) > so I can't just pull it to bits. I do have an identical (CPU/mobo) box in the > workshop as a workstation, however, which I could buy/borrow another drive > for and set up gmirror to try things out. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 19:35:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F6516A4DD for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:35:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD0443D49 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:35:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so2526164pye for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:35:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=htRHGAFCEIQJIDC62y1Q/Uz2GNeCcX1a2L7CKogtP5+LsKlsgpxKtQZh1iQ9qOYKugfaTbhEVxFpy6tki25WwreXuqJNq9vhknMaO0hIJzFj8iJZybbpPqOs9raHzm0Rq5//9UYPdoipZxd6CHSVqaJGyKNRMaOe0d31u4s199U= Received: by 10.35.106.15 with SMTP id i15mr13893322pym; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:35:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.119.1 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:35:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2a41acea0608211235o657397cbm777d44497fff3feb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 12:35:29 -0700 From: "Jack Vogel" To: "Darren Pilgrim" In-Reply-To: <44E94222.5050602@bitfreak.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44E94222.5050602@bitfreak.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Johnie Wong Subject: Re: Fail to install the driver of the on-board LAN Card X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:35:31 -0000 On 8/20/06, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > Johnie Wong wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > I am the user of FreeBSD 6.1. Recently, i buy a new server for my > > company which is a Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 (1.86GHz) with Intel > > D946GZIS mainboard, 2GB Consair DDR2 Ram, 3Ware 9500S-4LP, and 4X > > Seagate 250GB SATA II Harddrive. But when i install the on-board LAN > > card driver by activating the default fxp option, it is invisible. > > That board is really new, so I would guess you have a new network > controller with a PCI ID FreeBSD doesn't know about yet. It's a pretty > common occurrence, especially with Intel NICs. Post the complete output > of `pciconf -lv` (preferrably as an attached text file) and someone will > see if this is the case. OK, this part is kinda different, it has a MAC thats the same as the E1000 boards but the PHY is 10/100, so guess what..... :) You get to use the em driver, not the fxp. The 6.1 RELEASE may not yet have support, but since they merged my 6.0.5 and 6.1.4 drivers with the STABLE tip of tree if you get that latest driver it should work. If not let me know, Jack Intel LAD From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 19:52:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5EE16A4DD for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:52:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B050043D77 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:52:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [10.0.0.110]) by kagate1.punkt.de with ESMTP id k7LJq24j011409 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:52:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k7LJq2a9057868; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:52:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93@hugo10.ka.punkt.de) Received: (from ry93@localhost) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id k7LJq2Un057867; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:52:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:52:02 +0200 From: "Patrick M. Hausen" To: "Patrick M. Hausen" Message-ID: <20060821195202.GA57333@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> References: <20060821120052.0B25816A526@hub.freebsd.org> <200608211414.16731.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060821132743.GC45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <44E9B7C1.9010708@goodforbusiness.co.uk> <20060821142613.GI45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <44E9C5B3.90604@goodforbusiness.co.uk> <20060821145328.GL45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <20060821150744.GN45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060821150744.GN45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ICH7 SATA and em interrupt sharing X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:52:09 -0000 And yet more testing ... I rebuilt my kernel without USB devices and made sure atapci1 doesn't share an interrupt with anything: pcib1: 16 pcib2: 20 em0: 16 em1: 17 fxp0: 16 atapci1: 19 atkbdc0: 1 atkbd0: 1 sio0: 4 sio1: 3 ppc0: 7 Side note: on this particular box I had to leave the USB devices enabled in the BIOS setup, otherwise em0 would end up on the same interrupt as atapci1 |-) Then I ran make buildworld and in parallel started to transfer a large file via FTP (done by fetching a sparse file of 10 GB) maxing out or 100 Mbit/s LAN. *boom* - or so I thought ;-) The ssh session was stuck, the system did not respond to ICMP echo. OK, wait until tomorrow morning to reset it ... ... just gave it one more ping an hour later, and the machine was alive again! It did not panic/reboot, the buildworld was running and the file transfer was transferring a file. In /var/log messages I found: Aug 21 21:37:08 tomcat kernel: em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! Aug 21 21:39:55 tomcat kernel: em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! Aug 21 21:40:29 tomcat kernel: em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! Seems like for some reason the netwok card blocked for a couple of minutes, then resumed. This was all with debug.mpsafenet set to 1. Now I'm running the same stress test with debug.mpsafenet set to 0 and I haven't seen any problem/hang at all. Wait a minute ... now as I'm typing this message, ssh to the box hangs again. Damn. I think I'll try the fxp interface for production use and disable the onboard Gigabit NICs. Now the ssh session is responding again while the file transfer reports "Connection reset by peer". Dmesg shows: em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! I'm still not able to really reproduce the SATA problem others are reporting, besides forcing em0 to share its interrupt with the SATA controller. This can easily be avoided - at least with our hardware. Regards, Patrick M. Hausen Leiter Netzwerke und Sicherheit -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Vorholzstr. 25 Tel. 0721 9109 -0 Fax: -100 76137 Karlsruhe http://punkt.de From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 20:39:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21CEB16A4DD for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:39:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C45A543D62 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:39:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J4D00CVZ819G3D0@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:39:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kg-work.kg4.no ([80.203.92.117]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with SMTP id <0J4D00LNS80OU421@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:38:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 22:38:48 +0200 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen X-Face: "t9w2,-X@O^I`jVW\sonI3.,36KBLZE*AL[y9lL[PyFD*r_S:dIL9c[8Y>V42R0"!"yb_zN,f#%.[PYYNq; m"_0v; ~rUM2Yy!zmkh)3&U|u!=T(zyv,MHJv"nDH>OJ`t(@mil461d_B'Uo|'nMwlKe0Mv=kvV?Nh@>Hb<3s_z2jYgZhPb@?Wi^x1a~Hplz1.zH To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <20060821223848.683b7a40.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd5.5) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: speedstep / cpu frequency control on 6-stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:39:14 -0000 Hello, What ids the current way to control cpu speed (and power consumption) in FreeBSD 6-stable? Before, est was one way, but all traces of est has disappeared from /etc/defaults/rc.conf and thereabouts. I find something about powerd and power_profile, but they don't seem to work, and I can't seem to find out what variables / configuration items to set. 'man cpufreq' isn't much help in that regard either. Do I need working acpi to use a power control method? -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 20:56:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02D516A4DD for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:56:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [65.205.34.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21AD543D49 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:56:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264B1B810 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:56:02 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <023A30EB-733E-4D31-A55D-3B181E8FCA41@khera.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Vivek Khera Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 16:56:01 -0400 To: freebsd-stable X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:56:03 -0000 On Aug 21, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Ian Smith wrote: > a) should I upgrade from RELENG_5 straight to RELENG_6 or should I be > stopping off at 6.1-RELEASE along the way first? and > I'd go with 6.1-REL just to make sure you have a known working release, not that *you* broke something. With RELENG_6 you could luck into a broken system as shipped. > b) do I need to upgrade all existing ports (way out of date) before > the > source upgrade, or can I be confident of doing that from 6.1 (-R or > -S)? You really want to rebuild all your ports across major version changes. If not, over time as you rebuild certain libraries they will be pulling in multiple versions of other shared libs which may be linked to other versions of base system libs and could conflict with each other. Another advantage to rebuilding all the ports is you can clean out all your old 5.x system libraries once done. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 21:52:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633A816A4DA for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:52:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) Received: from koef.zs64.net (koef.zs64.net [213.238.47.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD53D43D4C for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:52:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) Received: (from stb@koef.zs64.net) (authenticated) by koef.zs64.net (8.13.8/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7LLq3Bf018229 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:52:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Stefan Bethke Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:52:02 +0200 To: Ian Smith X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:52:18 -0000 Am 21.08.2006 um 18:19 schrieb Ian Smith: > Hello -stable ones, > > I recently (without drama) upgraded a 5.4-RELEASE system to > FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #1: Tue Aug 1 11:11:20 EST 2006 > for 'target practice' at least, on the way to 6.1-STABLE > > I was preparing to portupgrade everything next, when I wondered: > > a) should I upgrade from RELENG_5 straight to RELENG_6 or should I be > stopping off at 6.1-RELEASE along the way first? and I'd go straight to 6-stable. Make sure you have a good backup, even if you stop over at 6.1. > b) do I need to upgrade all existing ports (way out of date) before > the > source upgrade, or can I be confident of doing that from 6.1 (-R or > -S)? > > FWIW: a wee Celeron 300, so minimising upgrade build times is > desirable. Unless you have business critical apps running (downtime must be minimal), you can wait until you've completed the upgrade to 6- stable, and then run portupgrade -af. If you'd like to run the portupgrade overnight, you might want to define BATCH, and possibly set any port building options in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf, otherwise, the port builds will be frequently interrupted by make config questions. Stefan -- Stefan Bethke Fon +49 170 346 0140 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 21:54:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B753B16A4DE for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:54:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frode@nordahl.net) Received: from smtp1.powertech.no (smtp1.powertech.no [195.159.0.145]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303DA43D62 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:54:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frode@nordahl.net) Received: from [192.168.123.190] (s1013-0074.dsl.start.no [195.159.196.170]) by smtp1.powertech.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB9EC80BD; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:54:31 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <44E47092.7050104@mawer.org> References: <44E47092.7050104@mawer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <92C9E79E-666E-459D-B42B-3509DA7E2440@nordahl.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Frode Nordahl Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:54:22 +0200 To: Antony Mawer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The need for initialising disks before use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:54:34 -0000 On 17. aug. 2006, at 15.35, Antony Mawer wrote: > Hi list, > > A quick question - is it recommended to initialise disks before > using them to allow the disks to map out any "bad spots" early on? > I've seen some "uninitialised" disks (ie. new disks, thrown into a > machine, newfs'd) start to show read errors within a few months of > deployment, which I thought one or two might seem okay, but on a > number of machines is more than a coincidence... > > Is it recommended/required to do something like: > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad0 bs=1m > > before use to ensure the drive's sector remappings are all in > place, before then doing a newfs? > > FWIW, I've been seeing this on more 6.0 systems that I would have > thought to be just chance... I think the change is that more systems use cheaper SATA drives now. On several occations I have been unable to build a RAID (hardware or software based) on brand new disks due to one of the drives "failing" during initialization. After zeroing all the drives with dd, everything works fine. I'm not sure if vendors cut corners on initially formatting their drives to save some $$ or if SATA just lacks some features over SCSI that causes trouble like this. -- Frode Nordahl From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 23:03:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53AB16A4E0 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:03:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3550D43D46 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:03:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (ppp226-110.lns2.adl4.internode.on.net [203.122.226.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.5/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7LN3ldc076697 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:33:48 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:33:35 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <20060821120052.0B25816A526@hub.freebsd.org> <20060821132743.GC45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <44E9B771.3080604@goodforbusiness.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <44E9B771.3080604@goodforbusiness.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2211789.GsS2999XVY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200608220833.42762.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -2.312 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: Dominic Marks Subject: Re: ATA problems again ... general problem of ICH7 or ATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:03:53 -0000 --nextPart2211789.GsS2999XVY Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 21 August 2006 23:08, Dominic Marks wrote: > You can use device.hints(5) to do this. > > I have the following in mine to force a RAID card and Sound card to > share IRQ 17. > You need to modify it to suit your environment. > > hw.pci3.13.INTA.irq=3D"17" > > The `13' value is the device number, you can find this in dmesg, same > for pciN. Any chance this could be documented somewhere? (Or tell me where if it is.. :) I checked pci(4) and device.hints(5)) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart2211789.GsS2999XVY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBE6jvO5ZPcIHs/zowRAl0EAJ9DbXSb+sDLACjLReUuaHXfthMh+gCgpfAf tFfxplUCMNSS+JieVfcXod8= =3iF7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2211789.GsS2999XVY-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 23:07:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B665716A4DA for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:07:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7A543D5A for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:07:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (ppp226-110.lns2.adl4.internode.on.net [203.122.226.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.5/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7LN7TdV076735 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:37:30 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:37:27 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <20060821223848.683b7a40.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <20060821223848.683b7a40.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1439140.CfQSOb94zE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200608220837.28300.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -2.312 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: Torfinn Ingolfsen Subject: Re: speedstep / cpu frequency control on 6-stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:07:42 -0000 --nextPart1439140.CfQSOb94zE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 22 August 2006 06:08, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > Hello, > > What ids the current way to control cpu speed (and power consumption) > in FreeBSD 6-stable? > Before, est was one way, but all traces of est has disappeared > from /etc/defaults/rc.conf and thereabouts. > I find something about powerd and power_profile, but they don't seem to > work, and I can't seem to find out what variables / configuration items > to set. 'man cpufreq' isn't much help in that regard either. Loading cpufreq should give you sysctl's which control CPU frequency. power= d=20 uses these to adjust frequency based on load. I have this in rc.conf powerd_enable=3D"YES" powerd_flags=3D"-i 70 -r 30 -a adaptive -b adaptive -n adaptive -p 200" And in dmesg.. cpu0: on acpi0 est0: on cpu0 p4tcc0: on cpu0 And sysctl.. dev.cpu.0.%desc: ACPI CPU dev.cpu.0.%driver: cpu dev.cpu.0.%location: handle=3D\_PR_.CPU0 dev.cpu.0.%pnpinfo: _HID=3Dnone _UID=3D0 dev.cpu.0.%parent: acpi0 dev.cpu.0.freq: 1225 dev.cpu.0.freq_levels: 1400/-1 1225/-1 1200/-1 1050/-1 1000/-1 875/-1 800/-= 1=20 700/-1 600/-1 525/-1 450/-1 375/-1 300/-1 225/-1 150/-1 75/-1 (This is a Pentium-M 1.4Ghz) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1439140.CfQSOb94zE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBE6jyw5ZPcIHs/zowRAq0RAJ9Bq6gQuNtc1VyuuCMrbYrgWEpVfACbBv7Z 2TySOmyzTtalZyIARPlUMMc= =wto3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1439140.CfQSOb94zE-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 21 23:17:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABBD816A4E0 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:17:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from core.byshenk.net (core.byshenk.net [62.58.73.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3A643D60 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:17:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from core.byshenk.net (localhost.aoes.com [127.0.0.1]) by core.byshenk.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7LNH0K8068521; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 01:17:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from byshenknet@core.byshenk.net) Received: (from byshenknet@localhost) by core.byshenk.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k7LNH0i4068520; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 01:17:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from byshenknet) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 01:17:00 +0200 From: Greg Byshenk To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060821231700.GJ633@core.byshenk.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=failed version=3.1.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on core.byshenk.net Cc: Ian Smith Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 23:17:04 -0000 On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:52:02PM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: > Am 21.08.2006 um 18:19 schrieb Ian Smith: > >I recently (without drama) upgraded a 5.4-RELEASE system to > >FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #1: Tue Aug 1 11:11:20 EST 2006 > >for 'target practice' at least, on the way to 6.1-STABLE > >I was preparing to portupgrade everything next, when I wondered: > >a) should I upgrade from RELENG_5 straight to RELENG_6 or should I be > >stopping off at 6.1-RELEASE along the way first? and > I'd go straight to 6-stable. Make sure you have a good backup, even > if you stop over at 6.1. I see no reason not to go directly to 6-stable (if that is what you plan to run); I've done it with multiple machines, and just jump right to the 6-stable version that is active on the machines running 6.x. Though I've had no problems, I second the recommendation to have a good backup. Also, if you don't have a known-good 6-stable build, you might want to upgrade to the GENERIC kernel. > >b) do I need to upgrade all existing ports (way out of date) before > >the source upgrade, or can I be confident of doing that from 6.1 > >(-R or -S)? > >FWIW: a wee Celeron 300, so minimising upgrade build times is > >desirable. > Unless you have business critical apps running (downtime must be > minimal), you can wait until you've completed the upgrade to 6- > stable, and then run portupgrade -af. If you'd like to run the > portupgrade overnight, you might want to define BATCH, and possibly > set any port building options in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf, > otherwise, the port builds will be frequently interrupted by make > config questions. It shouldn't be necessary to rebuild ports before the upgrade. If there is something running that is critical, you might want to upgrade it first, just be sure, but it probably isn't necessary. I upgraded a workstation with 200+ ports installed, and saw no problems (I can't for certain that nothing was broken before I upgraded the ports, but I experienced no problems). -- greg byshenk - gbyshenk@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 00:14:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96D016A4E0 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:14:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com) Received: from forrie.com (c-24-62-224-60.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [24.62.224.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6673543D53 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:14:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com) Received: from [192.168.1.98] (monster.forrie.com [192.168.1.98]) (authenticated bits=0) by forrie.com (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7M0EiAu020967 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:14:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from forrie@forrie.com) Message-ID: <44EA4C70.2050609@forrie.com> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:14:40 -0400 From: Forrest Aldrich User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060818) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/1703/Mon Aug 21 17:23:01 2006 on mail.forrie.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Order of devices listed in "ifconfig" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:14:45 -0000 I'm certain I read up on this somewhere before... When you install a FreeBSD system (6.1 here), the devices don't always configure "in order". For example, I have a few Dell PowerEdge systems, upon which 2 are FreeBSD.... The devices would normally appear "in order" (similar to Linux) where they are physically attached... first, em0 and em1 would be the motherboard NICs, then any PCI cards. So, I look at them physically, expecting to hook em1 into a separate network, but em1 is actually another port. BOTH systems are different, too. That's the best way I can think of to describe it. Anyone know how to solve this problem in FreeBSD-6.x. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 00:48:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172E116A4DA for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:48:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Mark_Andrews@isc.org) Received: from farside.isc.org (farside.isc.org [204.152.187.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C529443D49 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:48:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mark_Andrews@isc.org) Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost.isc.org [IPv6:::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by farside.isc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB07E6058 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:48:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marka@isc.org) Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7M0m9FM090263; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:48:09 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from marka@drugs.dv.isc.org) Message-Id: <200608220048.k7M0m9FM090263@drugs.dv.isc.org> To: Forrest Aldrich From: Mark Andrews In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:14:40 -0400." <44EA4C70.2050609@forrie.com> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:48:09 +1000 Sender: Mark_Andrews@isc.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Order of devices listed in "ifconfig" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:48:17 -0000 > I'm certain I read up on this somewhere before... > > When you install a FreeBSD system (6.1 here), the devices don't always > configure "in order". For example, I have a few Dell PowerEdge systems, > upon which 2 are FreeBSD.... > > The devices would normally appear "in order" (similar to Linux) where > they are physically attached... first, em0 and em1 would be the > motherboard NICs, then any PCI cards. > > So, I look at them physically, expecting to hook em1 into a separate > network, but em1 is actually another port. > > BOTH systems are different, too. > > That's the best way I can think of to describe it. > > Anyone know how to solve this problem in FreeBSD-6.x. > > > Thanks. I would post /var/run/dmesg.boot. I would also check that both boxes a physically wired the same, same system board rev. etc. On my multihomed box tx0 is always before sis0 which corresponds to the device order. tx0: port 0x1400-0x14ff mem 0xf4806000-0xf4806fff irq 9 at device 15.0 on pci0 sis0: port 0x1800-0x18ff mem 0xf4807000-0xf4807fff irq 9 at device 16.0 on pci0 -- ISC Training! October 16-20, 2006, in the San Francisco Bay Area, covering topics from DNS to DHCP. Email training@isc.org. -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews@isc.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 00:55:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536FA16A4DA for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:55:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A5243D46 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:55:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (ppp226-110.lns2.adl4.internode.on.net [203.122.226.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.5/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7M0tWLB087004 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:25:33 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:25:26 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <44EA4C70.2050609@forrie.com> In-Reply-To: <44EA4C70.2050609@forrie.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1504600.uNpPHM3RIC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200608221025.27192.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -2.312 () BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: Forrest Aldrich Subject: Re: Order of devices listed in "ifconfig" X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 00:55:43 -0000 --nextPart1504600.uNpPHM3RIC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 22 August 2006 09:44, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > The devices would normally appear "in order" (similar to Linux) where > they are physically attached... first, em0 and em1 would be the > motherboard NICs, then any PCI cards. I believe they're probed in order, but it's entirely up to your motherboard= =20 vendor as to which order that actually is - there's no way for the OS to=20 differentiate between an onboard and a PCI card. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1504600.uNpPHM3RIC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBE6lX/5ZPcIHs/zowRAs96AJ4vk7j6oxC2QIs5f966CyDsYLLKLwCfaBBz IKGJXACWmIpw1nswZrvj2dQ= =JmQB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1504600.uNpPHM3RIC-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 01:51:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BCC116A4DF for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 01:51:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF7043D4C for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 01:51:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so2636201pye for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:51:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=LJwcfpFDoOfizJ/91mrXdVtaT8Ee3Sr/3gouMeySskf6hkoUMFUV1UMJGmcnTDtGt0pArC7u7aVNlwcaOwcw6CAJryD1s00wWXrjfYtcQyzMI0TFUEzdYjAwVe2cIbhpM426y9nhFoAFiNSqe8dencaspuEyh74kUp4BJOyaRzY= Received: by 10.35.63.2 with SMTP id q2mr14489298pyk; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:51:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr ( [211.53.35.84]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 12sm211260nzn.2006.08.21.18.51.05; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:51:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (localhost.cdnetworks.co.kr [127.0.0.1]) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k7M1on7l013327 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:50:49 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Received: (from yongari@localhost) by michelle.cdnetworks.co.kr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k7M1omRL013326; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:50:48 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from pyunyh@gmail.com) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:50:47 +0900 From: Pyun YongHyeon To: "Patrick M. Hausen" Message-ID: <20060822015047.GA12848@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <20060821120052.0B25816A526@hub.freebsd.org> <200608211414.16731.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060821132743.GC45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <44E9B7C1.9010708@goodforbusiness.co.uk> <20060821142613.GI45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <44E9C5B3.90604@goodforbusiness.co.uk> <20060821145328.GL45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <20060821150744.GN45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <20060821195202.GA57333@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060821195202.GA57333@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ICH7 SATA and em interrupt sharing X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pyunyh@gmail.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 01:51:08 -0000 On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 09:52:02PM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > And yet more testing ... > > I rebuilt my kernel without USB devices and made sure > atapci1 doesn't share an interrupt with anything: > > pcib1: 16 > pcib2: 20 > em0: 16 > em1: 17 > fxp0: 16 > atapci1: 19 > atkbdc0: 1 > atkbd0: 1 > sio0: 4 > sio1: 3 > ppc0: 7 > > Side note: on this particular box I had to leave the USB devices > enabled in the BIOS setup, otherwise em0 would end up on the same > interrupt as atapci1 |-) > > Then I ran make buildworld and in parallel started to transfer a large > file via FTP (done by fetching a sparse file of 10 GB) maxing out > or 100 Mbit/s LAN. > > *boom* - or so I thought ;-) The ssh session was stuck, the system did > not respond to ICMP echo. OK, wait until tomorrow morning to reset it ... > ... just gave it one more ping an hour later, and the machine was > alive again! It did not panic/reboot, the buildworld was running and > the file transfer was transferring a file. > > In /var/log messages I found: > > Aug 21 21:37:08 tomcat kernel: em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! > Aug 21 21:39:55 tomcat kernel: em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! > Aug 21 21:40:29 tomcat kernel: em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! > > Seems like for some reason the netwok card blocked for a couple > of minutes, then resumed. > > This was all with debug.mpsafenet set to 1. Now I'm running the same > stress test with debug.mpsafenet set to 0 and I haven't seen any > problem/hang at all. > > Wait a minute ... now as I'm typing this message, ssh to the > box hangs again. Damn. > > I think I'll try the fxp interface for production use and disable the > onboard Gigabit NICs. > > Now the ssh session is responding again while the file transfer reports > "Connection reset by peer". > > Dmesg shows: > > em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! > em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! > em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! > em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! > em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! > em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! > Thanks for the testing. The above message means the patch really worked. Otherwise you would have seen (false) watchdog errors on your system. I guess the two possible cause of missing Tx completion interrupts comes from a chipset bug or Tx interrupt moderation mechanism. If Tx interrupt moderation mechanism is the cause of false watchdog triggering we should have to fix all device drivers that have Tx interrupt moderation capability. I'll have to check archives for bge(4). I'll commit the em(4) patch soon. What you see in ssh session and lack of response for ICMP echo request indicates other issues. I can't sure but it may not related with network drivers at all(eg. sharing interrupt with other devices). > I'm still not able to really reproduce the SATA problem others are > reporting, besides forcing em0 to share its interrupt with the > SATA controller. This can easily be avoided - at least with our > hardware. > > > Regards, > > Patrick M. Hausen > Leiter Netzwerke und Sicherheit > -- > punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung > Vorholzstr. 25 Tel. 0721 9109 -0 Fax: -100 > 76137 Karlsruhe http://punkt.de > _______________________________________________ -- Regards, Pyun YongHyeon From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 02:12:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E6D716A4DD for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:12:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dsyphers@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37FD43D45 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:12:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dsyphers@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.03) with ESMTP id k7M2CbYJ020196 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:12:37 -0700 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.1.7] (c-24-19-52-201.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [24.19.52.201]) (authenticated authid=dsyphers) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.7+UW06.06/8.13.7+UW06.03) with ESMTP id k7M2CaNL021776 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:12:37 -0700 From: David Syphers To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 19:14:49 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <023A30EB-733E-4D31-A55D-3B181E8FCA41@khera.org> In-Reply-To: <023A30EB-733E-4D31-A55D-3B181E8FCA41@khera.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608211914.49548.dsyphers@u.washington.edu> X-PMX-Version: 5.2.0.264296, Antispam-Engine: 2.4.0.264935, Antispam-Data: 2006.8.21.185442 X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CD 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __USER_AGENT 0' Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:12:38 -0000 On Monday 21 August 2006 13:56, Vivek Khera wrote: > On Aug 21, 2006, at 12:19 PM, Ian Smith wrote: > > b) do I need to upgrade all existing ports (way out of date) before > > the > > source upgrade, or can I be confident of doing that from 6.1 (-R or > > -S)? > > You really want to rebuild all your ports across major version > changes. If not, over time as you rebuild certain libraries they > will be pulling in multiple versions of other shared libs which may > be linked to other versions of base system libs and could conflict > with each other. To be clear: yes, you want to rebuild your ports, but only _after_ the upgrade. Before won't help. -David -- "To get out of the Metaphysical Void, you either have to grasp the meaning of the universe or roll doubles twice." -Cecil Adams From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 04:21:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770FF16A4DE for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 04:21:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leafy7382@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AF243D49 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 04:21:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leafy7382@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so2686986pye for ; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:21:58 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=MQQbyaqHWoiKe4+aXdfqKllt158Yj/hNmSqaQYlA5FI0Xog0EeDCUxA9qLNVrrk6gR7D04CGAEpAbrENpLhw3lZxtdeNARPkaRRUp3LjhCF2YqK1CiLhE4QJSltrO1hGWn33jGM90eluRsFtnMHgAyo22CAO79CQvKHWWufQcc0= Received: by 10.35.135.12 with SMTP id m12mr14745614pyn; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.124.18 with HTTP; Mon, 21 Aug 2006 21:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:21:58 +0800 From: "Jiawei Ye" To: "Dan Nelson" In-Reply-To: <20060815172728.GB88051@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44E1F796.5070105@rogers.com> <20060815172728.GB88051@dan.emsphone.com> Cc: Mike Jakubik , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TOP shows above 100% WCPU usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 04:21:59 -0000 On 8/16/06, Dan Nelson wrote: > > How can mysql use 160%? Is this a reporting bug in top because mysql is > > threaded? > > You have multiple CPUs, so a threaded process can theoretically reach > 100*ncpus cpu usage. > > -- > Dan Nelson > dnelson@allantgroup.com I am seeing this on a UP system too. last pid: 35355; load averages: 0.36, 0.08, 0.03 up 1+12:11:39 12:20:56 205 processes: 3 running, 202 sleeping CPU states: 97.8% user, 0.0% nice, 1.5% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.7% idle Mem: 122M Active, 52M Inact, 59M Wired, 7808K Cache, 34M Buf, 524K Free Swap: 1024M Total, 40M Used, 984M Free, 3% Inuse PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND 35343 www 22 4 0 275M 64620K accept 0:21 271.92% java 767 jabber 1 91 0 8836K 1284K select 7:07 0.00% perl5.8.8 875 pgsql 1 91 0 19880K 1748K select 0:20 0.00% postgres 840 vscan 1 4 0 22892K 18304K accept 0:17 0.00% clamd 4733 www 27 4 0 17428K 3268K kqread 0:10 0.00% httpd -- "Without the userland, the kernel is useless." --inspired by The Tao of Programming From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 07:53:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDFB616A4DD for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:53:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1352743D46 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:53:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hausen@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [10.0.0.110]) by kagate1.punkt.de with ESMTP id k7M7rN7G016138 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:53:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k7M7rMa9072856; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:53:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93@hugo10.ka.punkt.de) Received: (from ry93@localhost) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id k7M7rMcj072855; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:53:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ry93) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:53:22 +0200 From: "Patrick M. Hausen" To: Pyun YongHyeon Message-ID: <20060822075322.GC72101@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> References: <20060821120052.0B25816A526@hub.freebsd.org> <200608211414.16731.matt@chronos.org.uk> <20060821132743.GC45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <44E9B7C1.9010708@goodforbusiness.co.uk> <20060821142613.GI45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <44E9C5B3.90604@goodforbusiness.co.uk> <20060821145328.GL45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <20060821150744.GN45736@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <20060821195202.GA57333@hugo10.ka.punkt.de> <20060822015047.GA12848@cdnetworks.co.kr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060822015047.GA12848@cdnetworks.co.kr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ICH7 SATA and em interrupt sharing X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 07:53:25 -0000 Hi! On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 10:50:47AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > em0: Missing Tx completion interrupt! > > Thanks for the testing. > The above message means the patch really worked. Otherwise you > would have seen (false) watchdog errors on your system. > I guess the two possible cause of missing Tx completion interrupts > comes from a chipset bug or Tx interrupt moderation mechanism. If > Tx interrupt moderation mechanism is the cause of false watchdog > triggering we should have to fix all device drivers that have Tx > interrupt moderation capability. I'll have to check archives for > bge(4). I'll commit the em(4) patch soon. > > What you see in ssh session and lack of response for ICMP echo > request indicates other issues. I can't sure but it may not related > with network drivers at all(eg. sharing interrupt with other devices). Well, if I disable the em onboard interfaces and use the onboard fxp interface instead, everything runs smoothely. Looks like I will use this workaround for now. Etherexpress 100 cards in bulk quantities are cheap, so I can even insert a second NIC into the system. Regards, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Internet - Dienstleistungen - Beratung Vorholzstr. 25 Tel. 0721 9109 -0 Fax: -100 76137 Karlsruhe http://punkt.de From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 08:32:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC3316A5D3 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:32:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane.co.uk [62.140.220.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5856E43D90 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:32:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.10.217] (150.117-84-212.staticip.namesco.net [212.84.117.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.13.7/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k7M8WEfW076689 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:32:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jhary@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <44EAC105.7050204@unsane.co.uk> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:32:05 +0100 From: Vince User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060811) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Torfinn Ingolfsen References: <20060821223848.683b7a40.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <20060821223848.683b7a40.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: speedstep / cpu frequency control on 6-stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:32:21 -0000 Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > Hello, > > What ids the current way to control cpu speed (and power consumption) > in FreeBSD 6-stable? > Before, est was one way, but all traces of est has disappeared > from /etc/defaults/rc.conf and thereabouts. > I find something about powerd and power_profile, but they don't seem to > work, and I can't seem to find out what variables / configuration items > to set. 'man cpufreq' isn't much help in that regard either. In what way does powerd not work for you? (jhary@prawn)$grep powerd /etc/defaults/rc.conf powerd_enable="NO" # Run powerd to lower our power usage. powerd_flags="" # Flags to powerd (if enabled). read man powerd for flags and try powerd -v this should give an indication of what happens, for example I get {root@prawn}#powerd -v idle time > 90%, decreasing clock speed from 1666 MHz to 1457 MHz idle time > 90%, decreasing clock speed from 1457 MHz to 1249 MHz idle time > 90%, decreasing clock speed from 1249 MHz to 1041 MHz idle time > 90%, decreasing clock speed from 1041 MHz to 833 MHz idle time > 90%, decreasing clock speed from 833 MHz to 624 MHz idle time > 90%, decreasing clock speed from 624 MHz to 416 MHz idle time > 90%, decreasing clock speed from 416 MHz to 208 MHz idle time < 65%, increasing clock speed from 208 MHz to 624 MHz idle time > 90%, decreasing clock speed from 624 MHz to 416 MHz idle time > 90%, decreasing clock speed from 416 MHz to 208 MHz idle time < 65%, increasing clock speed from 208 MHz to 624 MHz idle time > 90%, decreasing clock speed from 624 MHz to 416 MHz which is a pain if i'm running X on mains so I tend to use -a maximum -b adaptive as my powerd flags as it defaults to adaptive even if your on mains power. > > Do I need working acpi to use a power control method? Umm not sure as mine works, but probably, since my dmesg says I have acpi_throttle0: {root@prawn}#dmesg | grep -i cpu CPU: Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2300 @ 1.66GHz (1662.51-MHz 686-class CPU) FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 cpu1: on acpi0 acpi_throttle1: on cpu1 SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! Vince From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 08:35:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AE016A4E0; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:35:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (relay0.rambler.ru [81.19.66.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F4443D62; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:35:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id B480560A9; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:35:06 +0400 (MSD) Received: from edoofus.park.rambler.ru (unknown [81.19.65.108]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 933C460A4; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:35:06 +0400 (MSD) Received: (from ru@localhost) by edoofus.park.rambler.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) id k7M8ZEb6042401; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:35:14 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ru) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:35:14 +0400 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: David Gilbert , Soren Schmidt Message-ID: <20060822083514.GE41304@rambler-co.ru> References: <17642.2105.391443.137742@canoe.dclg.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RYJh/3oyKhIjGcML" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17642.2105.391443.137742@canoe.dclg.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-Virus-Scanned: No virus found Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: /sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c 1.168 MFC? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:35:08 -0000 --RYJh/3oyKhIjGcML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 03:23:37PM -0400, David Gilbert wrote: > Could someone please MFC at least v 1.168 of ata-chipset.c into > RELENG_6? Specifically the Nvidia NFORCE-4 support? Most of the > AMD64 motherboards I've gotten lately require this patch. =20 >=20 > I have been able to apply diff between 1.165 and 1.168 to RELENG-6 and > it makes the chipset work. (this also requires 1.65 to 1.68 of > ata-pci.h). >=20 > Any takers? >=20 I'll do it in a few days if Soren doesn't do it earlier -- I also have plenty of such motherboards which want to meet 6.x. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --RYJh/3oyKhIjGcML Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE6sHCqRfpzJluFF4RAmDnAJ9O9mc1ltCgiRlsdS9GPgAfBhnblACfSUpH X3k4TiePC89/mRXC/mwAv/Q= =zyeX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RYJh/3oyKhIjGcML-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 08:56:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FFC16A4DF for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:56:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from soren.schmidt@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F9543D55 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:56:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from soren.schmidt@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so1857740wxd for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 01:56:19 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=k4KNAl485iJyqR2Gs/NyPX0pD9u9NaIOlrF/dYtsvQQbtJdj/UMzimK5s98iEcrLqeXLIt6/YM3RQqTU3aSRG1uVVBpzRw8JpIrqO59eUnntBnofN9bKGzRhcR7BbXVAq0cRbUUBRdJbuBhNeEOMzXmlM+N1PLq3UoL1rPJKbyE= Received: by 10.90.105.19 with SMTP id d19mr312821agc; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 01:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.65.6 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 01:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <82eac8c60608220156t7991c121p250c4c6c8da52fc6@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:56:19 +0200 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?=" To: "Ruslan Ermilov" In-Reply-To: <20060822083514.GE41304@rambler-co.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <17642.2105.391443.137742@canoe.dclg.ca> <20060822083514.GE41304@rambler-co.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Soren Schmidt , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, David Gilbert Subject: Re: /sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c 1.168 MFC? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:56:21 -0000 I plan to bacport *all* of ATA, as there are so many bugfixes that a resync is needed. ATA from -current fits right into 6-stable so its a nobrainer it just need = a little more exposure... -S=F8ren On 8/22/06, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 03:23:37PM -0400, David Gilbert wrote: > > Could someone please MFC at least v 1.168 of ata-chipset.c into > > RELENG_6? Specifically the Nvidia NFORCE-4 support? Most of the > > AMD64 motherboards I've gotten lately require this patch. > > > > I have been able to apply diff between 1.165 and 1.168 to RELENG-6 and > > it makes the chipset work. (this also requires 1.65 to 1.68 of > > ata-pci.h). > > > > Any takers? > > > I'll do it in a few days if Soren doesn't do it earlier -- I > also have plenty of such motherboards which want to meet 6.x. > > > Cheers, > -- > Ruslan Ermilov > ru@FreeBSD.org > FreeBSD committer > > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 09:03:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B700A16A4FF; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (relay0.rambler.ru [81.19.66.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF1C43D69; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:03:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD9E5EFE; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:03:02 +0400 (MSD) Received: from edoofus.park.rambler.ru (unknown [81.19.65.108]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3785EE3; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:03:02 +0400 (MSD) Received: (from ru@localhost) by edoofus.park.rambler.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) id k7M93Asr042824; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:03:10 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ru) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:03:10 +0400 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: S?ren Schmidt Message-ID: <20060822090310.GB42522@rambler-co.ru> References: <17642.2105.391443.137742@canoe.dclg.ca> <20060822083514.GE41304@rambler-co.ru> <82eac8c60608220156t7991c121p250c4c6c8da52fc6@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="U+BazGySraz5kW0T" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <82eac8c60608220156t7991c121p250c4c6c8da52fc6@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-Virus-Scanned: No virus found Cc: Soren Schmidt , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, David Gilbert Subject: Re: /sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c 1.168 MFC? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:03:04 -0000 --U+BazGySraz5kW0T Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Soren, On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 10:56:19AM +0200, S?ren Schmidt wrote: > I plan to bacport *all* of ATA, as there are so many bugfixes that a > resync is needed. > ATA from -current fits right into 6-stable so its a nobrainer it just = need > a little more exposure... >=20 Do you have any ETA? Yes, I'm currently running HEAD version of sys/dev/at= a/ on these motherboards. Thanks! Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --U+BazGySraz5kW0T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE6shOqRfpzJluFF4RAk3vAJ9QJKvWQ0ZQm0uzrVf+1+nvpydZDQCffxTy I0xccFwsUT99GLriwdv5G3U= =8McR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --U+BazGySraz5kW0T-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 09:05:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464A816A4F8 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:05:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from soren.schmidt@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED56E43D78 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:04:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from soren.schmidt@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so1859731wxd for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:04:44 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=pH6+XhoFjGu4x2fy+QWJQHTrWfyenFiGKA1ZJaiaa4prJSk5m///WzZBgt10ogrKevOPQXQnjb0yj7YY9h5vyWYs6bLWWVc78Hrl3ubdcqMZu5bGytSZ21AWQoBvkBwblVULkHagVJcRrba3RhZ+/mdU4t7Ip3M/mi1IPDIOlh0= Received: by 10.90.113.18 with SMTP id l18mr384811agc; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:04:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.65.6 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 02:04:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <82eac8c60608220204p42fb4b3fs335569e254ad6e58@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:04:44 +0200 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?=" To: "Ruslan Ermilov" In-Reply-To: <20060822090310.GB42522@rambler-co.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <17642.2105.391443.137742@canoe.dclg.ca> <20060822083514.GE41304@rambler-co.ru> <82eac8c60608220156t7991c121p250c4c6c8da52fc6@mail.gmail.com> <20060822090310.GB42522@rambler-co.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Soren Schmidt , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, David Gilbert Subject: Re: /sys/dev/ata/ata-chipset.c 1.168 MFC? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:05:31 -0000 Give me a few days and I'll get to it if I dont get any serious issues before that... -S=F8ren On 8/22/06, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > Hi Soren, > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 10:56:19AM +0200, S?ren Schmidt wrote: > > I plan to bacport *all* of ATA, as there are so many bugfixes that a > > resync is needed. > > ATA from -current fits right into 6-stable so its a nobrainer it jus= t > need > > a little more exposure... > > > Do you have any ETA? Yes, I'm currently running HEAD version of > sys/dev/ata/ > on these motherboards. > > Thanks! > > > Cheers, > -- > Ruslan Ermilov > ru@FreeBSD.org > FreeBSD committer > > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 10:04:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31A3116A4E1 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:04:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcel@slowthinkers.net) Received: from piglet.slowthinkers.net (piglet.slowthinkers.net [62.251.101.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829ED43DD4 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:04:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcel@slowthinkers.net) Received: from piglet.slowthinkers.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by piglet.slowthinkers.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k7MA487g051845 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:04:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marcel@piglet.slowthinkers.net) Message-Id: <200608221004.k7MA487g051845@piglet.slowthinkers.net> X-Organization: SlowThinkers X-Address: P.O. box 10299, 2501 HG 's-Gravenhage, The netherlands To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Anne Marcel Roorda MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <51843.1156241048.1@piglet.slowthinkers.net> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:04:08 +0200 Sender: marcel@slowthinkers.net Subject: if_xl WOL patch against 5.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:04:46 -0000 Hi, There has been an open PR to enable WOL on HEAD since Jul 2005: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/83807 That included WOL wupport for the if_sis driver. I've used that to create a patch for 5.5 and the if_xl driver, I do not have access to a card that uses the if_sis driver so I did not modify that driver. The patch is available from: http://www.slowthinkers.net/~marcel/diff/22-08-2006.freebsd.wol.diff I've tested it against a card that is detected as: xl0: <3Com 3c905C-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xc400-0xc47f mem 0xd8000000-0xd800007f irq 19 at device 9.0 on pci0 What would be the next step to get this commited ? Regards, - marcel From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 10:16:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68D416A4E0 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:16:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62DC943D4C for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:16:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J4E0017Y9W6HL60@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:16:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kg-work.kg4.no ([80.203.92.117]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with SMTP id <0J4E00AAG9TK4G51@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:15:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:15:20 +0200 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen X-Face: "t9w2,-X@O^I`jVW\sonI3.,36KBLZE*AL[y9lL[PyFD*r_S:dIL9c[8Y>V42R0"!"yb_zN,f#%.[PYYNq; m"_0v; ~rUM2Yy!zmkh)3&U|u!=T(zyv,MHJv"nDH>OJ`t(@mil461d_B'Uo|'nMwlKe0Mv=kvV?Nh@>Hb<3s_z2jYgZhPb@?Wi^x1a~Hplz1.zH In-reply-to: <44EAC105.7050204@unsane.co.uk> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <20060822121520.c8b4b907.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd5.5) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <20060821223848.683b7a40.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> <44EAC105.7050204@unsane.co.uk> Subject: Re: speedstep / cpu frequency control on 6-stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:16:56 -0000 On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:32:05 +0100 Vince wrote: My system is: root@kg-home# uname -a FreeBSD kg-home.kg4.no 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #2: Mon Aug 21 15:58:01 CEST 2006 root@kg-home.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/AS5672 i386 root@kg-home# dmesg | grep -i cpu CPU: Genuine Intel(R) CPU T2250 @ 1.73GHz (1733.41-MHz 686-class CPU) cpu0 on motherboard > powerd -v I get: root@kg-home# powerd -v powerd: lookup freq: No such file or directory > > Do I need working acpi to use a power control method? > Umm not sure as mine works, but probably, since my dmesg says I have Ok, I just checked, and with acpi enabled, powerd runs. I run this laptop (AcerAspire AS5672) with acpi disabled, as this is currently the only way I can get a network connection working on it. Howeever, it gets very hot, so I would like to control the temperature better. -- Regards Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 10:22:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7A5316A4DE for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:22:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435FE43D53 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:22:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1sminn1.broadpark.no ([80.202.4.59]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J4E001OLA4WHZ60@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:22:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from kg-work.kg4.no ([80.203.92.117]) by osl1sminn1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with SMTP id <0J4E00AQF9YV4I61@osl1sminn1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:18:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:18:31 +0200 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen X-Face: "t9w2,-X@O^I`jVW\sonI3.,36KBLZE*AL[y9lL[PyFD*r_S:dIL9c[8Y>V42R0"!"yb_zN,f#%.[PYYNq; m"_0v; ~rUM2Yy!zmkh)3&U|u!=T(zyv,MHJv"nDH>OJ`t(@mil461d_B'Uo|'nMwlKe0Mv=kvV?Nh@>Hb<3s_z2jYgZhPb@?Wi^x1a~Hplz1.zH In-reply-to: <200608220837.28300.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-id: <20060822121831.33462451.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.7 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i386-portbld-freebsd5.5) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <20060821223848.683b7a40.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> <200608220837.28300.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Subject: Re: speedstep / cpu frequency control on 6-stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:22:12 -0000 On Tue, 22 Aug 2006 08:37:27 +0930 Daniel O'Connor wrote: > Loading cpufreq should give you sysctl's which control CPU frequency. > powerd uses these to adjust frequency based on load. > > I have this in rc.conf > powerd_enable="YES" > powerd_flags="-i 70 -r 30 -a adaptive -b adaptive -n adaptive -p 200" With acpi enabled on this laptop, the above parameters works, and powerd runs. However, then I don't have any network connection to it. Devil's choice :-( With acpi disabled, powerd refuses to run. Anyway, thanks for quick and good answers, both of you. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 10:31:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FB416A4DE for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:31:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from mail-gw4.york.ac.uk (mail-gw4.york.ac.uk [144.32.128.249]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0955143D53 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:31:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: from buffy.york.ac.uk (buffy-128.york.ac.uk [144.32.128.160]) by mail-gw4.york.ac.uk (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7MAVOLD026402; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:31:24 +0100 (BST) Received: from buffy.york.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by buffy.york.ac.uk (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7MAVEgY008576; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:31:19 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) Received: (from ga9@localhost) by buffy.york.ac.uk (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k7MAUwCk008575; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:30:58 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: buffy.york.ac.uk: ga9 set sender to gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk using -f From: Gavin Atkinson To: Andy Hilker In-Reply-To: <20060821191951.GA32807@mail.crypta.net> References: <20060821135318.GA12255@mail.crypta.net> <200608211612.22931.max@love2party.net> <20060821161428.GA20152@mail.crypta.net> <1156181747.4356.37.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> <20060821191951.GA32807@mail.crypta.net> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 11:30:58 +0100 Message-Id: <1156242658.8424.5.camel@buffy.york.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-York-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-York-MailScanner-From: gavin.atkinson@ury.york.ac.uk Cc: Max Laier , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: device carp / freebsd-update X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:31:28 -0000 On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 21:19 +0200, Andy Hilker wrote: > You (Gavin Atkinson) wrote: > [...] > > I don't suppose there's any chance you know if ucarp works with > > 6.1-RELEASE and IPv6? This is the one thing stopping me moving my > > machines to 6.1-RELEASE. > > > > If you don't know, then you've given me yet another thing to add to my > > todo list! > > No, sorry, I have not tested it. But maybe the kernel carp? No, kernel carp used to work with IPv6 in 6.0-RELEASE, but was broken sometime before 6.1-RELEASE. It's all in kern/98622. I may have to test ucarp though, it would be nice to be able to run a GENERIC kernel, although my gut instinct is that this sort of functionality should be kept in the kernel. Gavin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 12:49:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D8616A4E1; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:49:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E685D43DAB; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:49:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (fmhmda@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7MCn1KO099005; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:49:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id k7MCn1M8099004; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:49:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:49:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200608221249.k7MCn1M8099004@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, dougb@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <44E9EB82.7010104@FreeBSD.org> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.8.0-20051224 ("Ronay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:49:06 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Subject: Re: make buildworld does nothing X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, dougb@FreeBSD.ORG List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:49:33 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > Doug Barton wrote: > > > Tom Hummel wrote: > > > > alright, it was bash :( stupid shell. > > > > > > Um, sorry, let's not blame the shell for the BCK (between chair and > > > keyboard) problem. Lots of us use bash as our everyday shell (for privileged > > > and unprivileged users) without the kinds of problems you described. The > > > first thing I do when I install a new freebsd machine is to change root's > > > shell to /bin/sh, and copy over my customized .profile which either execs > > > bash if it finds it, or sets up sh with my aliases, etc. > > > > That's what "su -m" is good for. > > There are actually some things in root's environment that I want to be > different Me too. That's why I have this in my ~/.zshrc: if [[ $EUID -ne 0 ]]; then ... # settings for non-root only else ... # settings for root only fi When a new machine gets into my hands, all I have to do is copy over my ~/.zshrc. Then I will have my familiar work environment, both as normal user and as root. Another good thing about that approach is the fact that you don't have to change anything outside of your home. In particular, you don't have to change root's login shell or anything inside root's home, so other admins on the machine aren't affected at all, and everyone can use his own favourite shell and profile, without interfering with anybody else. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "C++ is to C as Lung Cancer is to Lung." -- Thomas Funke From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 13:05:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C51C16A4DF for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:05:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [83.120.8.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A537543D49 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:05:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (bczgzu@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7MD5Xl0099805; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:05:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id k7MD5WBE099804; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:05:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from olli) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:05:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200608221305.k7MD5WBE099804@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, fydernix@gmail.com In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.8.0-20051224 ("Ronay") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.11-STABLE (i386)) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.1.2 (lurza.secnetix.de [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:05:39 +0200 (CEST) Cc: Subject: Re: IPFW rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, fydernix@gmail.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:05:41 -0000 SigmaX asdf wrote: > I'm trying to setup IPFW to block all ports except those I specify. > For starters I'm just opening SSH. > > # ipfw list > 00050 divert 8668 ip4 from any to any via rl0 > 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > 00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > 00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > 00301 allow log tcp from any to any dst-port 22 > 00399 deny ip from any to any > 65000 allow ip from any to any > 65535 deny ip from any to any > > Traffic is still blocked on port 22 -- I can't login via SSH. What am > I doing wrong, and what rule should I be using to allow SSH in and > through? TCP connections are always 2-way (i.e. they require both ingoing and outgoing packets). But your rules allow only one way. There are three possibilities: (1) Sdd a rule "allow log tcp from any to any src-port 22" (not very efficient, but works). (2) Add "setup" to the dst-port 22 rule and add a rule that allows established connections. (3) Use "keep-state". See the ipfw(8) manual page for details. You should also read a good book on TCP/IP and packet filter configuration. By the way, you probably should also allow name server traffic (port 53, UDP and TCP) and ICMP packets. Best regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing Dienstleistungen mit Schwerpunkt FreeBSD: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "That's what I love about GUIs: They make simple tasks easier, and complex tasks impossible." -- John William Chambless From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 15:14:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7611216A4E1 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:14:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@fqdn.net) Received: from host.fqdn.net (host.fqdn.net [194.242.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0A343D70 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:14:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sam@fqdn.net) Received: by host.fqdn.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id D1D422D2; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:14:07 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:14:07 +0100 From: Sam Eaton To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060822151407.GN68132@host.fqdn.net> References: <09BFF2FA5EAB4A45B6655E151BBDD90301B7B68B@NT-IRVA-0750.brcm.ad.broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <09BFF2FA5EAB4A45B6655E151BBDD90301B7B68B@NT-IRVA-0750.brcm.ad.broadcom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: bce0: Error mapping mbuf into TX chain! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:14:14 -0000 On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:27:09AM -0700, David Christensen wrote: > > > > The driver seems to work fine now, that test no longer crashes it. I > > also did some iperf tests between two machines with these cards ( the > > other running linux) and I was getting ~950 MBit /sec between them! > > > > Thanks for your help! I'll keep beating on these machines for a few > > days to come, but will be so glad to get them into productions, > > they're so fast! :-) > > > > Glad to hear things are working now. We've also got a Dell 1950, that was exhibiting exactly the same symptoms. I manually patched up the bce driver and rebuilt the kernel, which got me to the point of having a working enough network device to be able to cvsup to -STABLE and rebuild world and kernel. However, now we no longer get the 'Error mapping mbuf into TX chain!' errors, but instead, under quite low network load, we get : Watchdog timeout occurred, resetting! Which it never really entirely recovers from, requiring a reboot to get working networking back again. I'm a bit at a loss as to what to check next. Only thing that seems particularly different to the other systems described above is that we were running the i386 build, rather than the amd64, so I'm installing amd64 stable instead, just in case this makes any difference. I'm happy to provide any debugging output or whatever that might make it easier for anyone else to help diagnose things... Thanks, Sam. -- "Fortified with Essential Bitterness and Sarcasm" Matt Groening, "Binky's Guide to Love". From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 15:37:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49ECF16A4DA for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:37:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from gaia.nimnet.asn.au (nimbin.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.45.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5206843D6D for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:37:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (smithi@localhost) by gaia.nimnet.asn.au (8.8.8/8.8.8R1.4) with SMTP id BAA12206; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:37:10 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 01:37:09 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Greg Byshenk In-Reply-To: <20060821231700.GJ633@core.byshenk.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: David Syphers , Vivek Khera , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Stefan Bethke Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:37:42 -0000 Thanks to all who responded for the collective good advice. On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Greg Byshenk wrote: > On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:52:02PM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: > > Am 21.08.2006 um 18:19 schrieb Ian Smith: > > > >I recently (without drama) upgraded a 5.4-RELEASE system to > > >FreeBSD 5.5-STABLE #1: Tue Aug 1 11:11:20 EST 2006 > > >for 'target practice' at least, on the way to 6.1-STABLE > > > >I was preparing to portupgrade everything next, when I wondered: > > > >a) should I upgrade from RELENG_5 straight to RELENG_6 or should I be > > >stopping off at 6.1-RELEASE along the way first? and > > > I'd go straight to 6-stable. Make sure you have a good backup, even > > if you stop over at 6.1. > > I see no reason not to go directly to 6-stable (if that is what you plan > to run); I've done it with multiple machines, and just jump right to the > 6-stable version that is active on the machines running 6.x. > > Though I've had no problems, I second the recommendation to have a good > backup. Also, if you don't have a known-good 6-stable build, you might > want to upgrade to the GENERIC kernel. Thanks. On reflection, I think I'll go via 6.1 (more target practice), use GENERIC if there's any trouble, then to 6-stable as a smaller step. > > >b) do I need to upgrade all existing ports (way out of date) before > > >the source upgrade, or can I be confident of doing that from 6.1 > > >(-R or -S)? > > > >FWIW: a wee Celeron 300, so minimising upgrade build times is > > >desirable. > > > Unless you have business critical apps running (downtime must be > > minimal), you can wait until you've completed the upgrade to 6- > > stable, and then run portupgrade -af. If you'd like to run the > > portupgrade overnight, you might want to define BATCH, and possibly > > set any port building options in /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf, > > otherwise, the port builds will be frequently interrupted by make > > config questions. Good reminders; this box won't be critical till it's all working .. > It shouldn't be necessary to rebuild ports before the upgrade. If > there is something running that is critical, you might want to upgrade > it first, just be sure, but it probably isn't necessary. I upgraded a > workstation with 200+ ports installed, and saw no problems (I can't > for certain that nothing was broken before I upgraded the ports, but > I experienced no problems). Good to confirm. I haven't so many ports installed that I couldn't start from scratch if it all fell over, so I can play with ports and packages till I finally learn how to use all the tools effectively. Cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 17:31:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28BDC16A4DA for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:31:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx24.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3EAA43D4C for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:31:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 10724 invoked by uid 399); 22 Aug 2006 17:31:07 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.10?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Aug 2006 17:31:07 -0000 Message-ID: <44EB3F5C.8070402@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 10:31:08 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200608221249.k7MCn1M8099004@lurza.secnetix.de> In-Reply-To: <200608221249.k7MCn1M8099004@lurza.secnetix.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: make buildworld does nothing X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:31:08 -0000 Oliver Fromme wrote: > Me too. That's why I have this in my ~/.zshrc: That's the great thing about Unix, more than one way to do things. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 18:46:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A22716A4DD for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:46:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bjordan@lumeta.com) Received: from MAIL.corp.lumeta.com (h65-246-245-23.lumeta.com [65.246.245.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F1443D45 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:46:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjordan@lumeta.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:46:04 -0400 Message-ID: <78ED28FACE63744386D68D8A9D1CF5D4104AC4@MAIL.corp.lumeta.com> In-Reply-To: <20060822151407.GN68132@host.fqdn.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: bce0: Error mapping mbuf into TX chain! Thread-Index: AcbF/c8QhLnmgbQeSKWw18WMDyMCrgAHDJ7A From: "Bucky Jordan" To: "Sam Eaton" , Cc: Subject: RE: bce0: Error mapping mbuf into TX chain! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:46:13 -0000 Sam, I've got a PowerEdge 2950 with a DRAC 5 card, and I'm having what appears to be the same set of issues. I'm running 6.1 amd64 RELEASE. I've only gotten the " bce0: Error mapping mbuf into TX chain!" error a few times now. Although the box isn't in production at the moment, we've been sending quite a bit of data (several GB) across the interface without a hitch (basically remote COPY statements for postgresql). It sounds like your 1950 is/was having the issue more frequently (our 2950 stays up for days at a time). However, the fact that I do get the error every now and then is still a concern, so I plan to rebuild world and kernel when I get the chance. Please keep us posted on your findings, and if it'd be useful to have another box to run tests on, I'd be happy to give it a go. Thanks, Bucky=20 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Sam Eaton Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 11:14 AM To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bce0: Error mapping mbuf into TX chain! On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:27:09AM -0700, David Christensen wrote: > >=20 > > The driver seems to work fine now, that test no longer crashes it. I > > also did some iperf tests between two machines with these cards ( the > > other running linux) and I was getting ~950 MBit /sec between them! > >=20 > > Thanks for your help! I'll keep beating on these machines for a few > > days to come, but will be so glad to get them into productions, > > they're so fast! :-) > >=20 >=20 > Glad to hear things are working now. We've also got a Dell 1950, that was exhibiting exactly the same symptoms. I manually patched up the bce driver and rebuilt the kernel, which got me to the point of having a working enough network device to be able to cvsup to -STABLE and rebuild world and kernel. However, now we no longer get the 'Error mapping mbuf into TX chain!' errors, but instead, under quite low network load, we get :=20 Watchdog timeout occurred, resetting! Which it never really entirely recovers from, requiring a reboot to get working networking back again. I'm a bit at a loss as to what to check next. Only thing that seems particularly different to the other systems described above is that we were running the i386 build, rather than the amd64, so I'm installing amd64 stable instead, just in case this makes any difference. I'm happy to provide any debugging output or whatever that might make it easier for anyone else to help diagnose things... Thanks, Sam. --=20 "Fortified with Essential Bitterness and Sarcasm" Matt Groening, "Binky's Guide to Love". _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 18:51:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A3316A4DE for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:51:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [65.205.34.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A35043D49 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:51:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (unknown [192.168.1.5]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A032B810 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:51:32 -0400 (EDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-5--275652070; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: <5B7BD83A-6316-4C20-903E-B5D66D4F2642@khera.org> From: Vivek Khera Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 14:51:30 -0400 To: freebsd-stable X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:51:42 -0000 --Apple-Mail-5--275652070 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Ian Smith wrote: >> It shouldn't be necessary to rebuild ports before the upgrade. If >> there is something running that is critical, you might want to >> upgrade > [ ... ] > Good to confirm. I haven't so many ports installed that I couldn't > start from scratch if it all fell over, so I can play with ports and > packages till I finally learn how to use all the tools effectively. you *really* want to rebuild anything that uses shared libs from the ports tree, or anything that is a shared lib in the ports tree. Things that only use base system libs and don't do any dyanamic loading of external object code are safe to leave alone, as long as they don't provide shared objects. don't find this out the hard way :-( --Apple-Mail-5--275652070-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 18:56:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4FCF16A4E1 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:56:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from todorov@paladin.bulgarpress.com) Received: from gregorian.transpress.bg (gregorian.transpress.bg [82.147.129.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDE7D43D45 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:56:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from todorov@paladin.bulgarpress.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by gregorian.transpress.bg (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD3AE5; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:58:43 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gregorian.transpress.bg Received: from gregorian.transpress.bg ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gregorian.transpress.bg [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ud5tE+Jlo4wc; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:58:42 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [192.168.6.8] (unknown [87.126.135.207]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gregorian.transpress.bg (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66B387; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:58:41 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <44EB5354.6070007@paladin.bulgarpress.com> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:56:20 +0300 From: "Todorov @ Paladin" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vivek Khera References: <5B7BD83A-6316-4C20-903E-B5D66D4F2642@khera.org> In-Reply-To: <5B7BD83A-6316-4C20-903E-B5D66D4F2642@khera.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 18:56:25 -0000 Vivek Khera напиÑа: > > On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:37 AM, Ian Smith wrote: > >>> It shouldn't be necessary to rebuild ports before the upgrade. If >>> there is something running that is critical, you might want to upgrade >> [ ... ] >> Good to confirm. I haven't so many ports installed that I couldn't >> start from scratch if it all fell over, so I can play with ports and >> packages till I finally learn how to use all the tools effectively. > > you *really* want to rebuild anything that uses shared libs from the > ports tree, or anything that is a shared lib in the ports tree. Things > that only use base system libs and don't do any dyanamic loading of > external object code are safe to leave alone, as long as they don't > provide shared objects. > > don't find this out the hard way :-( > How to find which is dynamically using libs and which application is not? This is something I was wondering before... Thank you in advance. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 19:23:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9AF016A4DE for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:23:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83AFD43D46 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:23:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout07/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k7MJN40n012471; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:23:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [17.214.14.142] (a17-214-14-142.apple.com [17.214.14.142]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin07/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k7MJN13L002898; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:23:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <44EB5354.6070007@paladin.bulgarpress.com> References: <5B7BD83A-6316-4C20-903E-B5D66D4F2642@khera.org> <44EB5354.6070007@paladin.bulgarpress.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:23:00 -0700 To: "Todorov @ Paladin" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAA+k= X-Language-Identified: TRUE Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:23:05 -0000 On Aug 22, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Todorov @ Paladin wrote: [ ... ] > How to find which is dynamically using libs and which application > is not? You can use ldd. In practice, however, pretty much all software nowadays depends on shared libraries, so it's reasonable to do a "pkg_delete -a" after upgrading to a new major version of FreeBSD, and then reinstall all of the ports you use once you've finished upgrading. Run "pkg_info" before the upgrade and keep track of this output to help you remember what ports you've got installed... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 19:28:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7EA16A4DE for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:28:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sam@fqdn.net) Received: from host.fqdn.net (host.fqdn.net [194.242.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55D0F43D68 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:28:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sam@fqdn.net) Received: by host.fqdn.net (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 7001A2A0; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:28:36 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:28:36 +0100 From: Sam Eaton To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060822192836.GA10176@host.fqdn.net> Mail-Followup-To: stable@freebsd.org References: <20060822151407.GN68132@host.fqdn.net> <78ED28FACE63744386D68D8A9D1CF5D4104AC4@MAIL.corp.lumeta.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <78ED28FACE63744386D68D8A9D1CF5D4104AC4@MAIL.corp.lumeta.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: bce0: Error mapping mbuf into TX chain! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:28:42 -0000 On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 02:46:04PM -0400, Bucky Jordan wrote: > Sam, > > I've got a PowerEdge 2950 with a DRAC 5 card, and I'm having what > appears to be the same set of issues. I'm running 6.1 amd64 RELEASE. > > I've only gotten the " bce0: Error mapping mbuf into TX chain!" error a > few times now. Although the box isn't in production at the moment, we've > been sending quite a bit of data (several GB) across the interface > without a hitch (basically remote COPY statements for postgresql). It > sounds like your 1950 is/was having the issue more frequently (our 2950 > stays up for days at a time). The 'error mapping mbuf' error seems to have been fixed by the latest set of changes to if_bce.c - after upgrading to the latest stable, that problem stopped happening. However, instead of that, under rather higher load, we now get the watchdog timer error instead. This is not good :) I can get it within minutes with something like building something big from ports, during the initial source download. > However, the fact that I do get the error every now and then is still a > concern, so I plan to rebuild world and kernel when I get the chance. > > Please keep us posted on your findings, and if it'd be useful to have > another box to run tests on, I'd be happy to give it a go. I think moving to stable will fix the mbuf error for you, as that's what others report. You, and all the other reports I've seen have been running amd64, which I haven't been (I didn't build the box originally). I'll know tommorow if amd64 makes much of a difference or not. Oh, other info - I'm running the standard SMP kernel config with no modifications. Sam. -- "Fortified with Essential Bitterness and Sarcasm" Matt Groening, "Binky's Guide to Love". From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 19:32:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07E716A4DD for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:32:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [65.205.34.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5003343D49 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:32:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (unknown [192.168.1.5]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44E8B80F; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:32:38 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <44EB5354.6070007@paladin.bulgarpress.com> References: <5B7BD83A-6316-4C20-903E-B5D66D4F2642@khera.org> <44EB5354.6070007@paladin.bulgarpress.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-8--273185447; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Message-Id: From: Vivek Khera Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:32:37 -0400 To: "Todorov @ Paladin" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 19:32:40 -0000 --Apple-Mail-8--273185447 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On Aug 22, 2006, at 2:56 PM, Todorov @ Paladin wrote: >> don't find this out the hard way :-( >> > How to find which is dynamically using libs and which application > is not? > > This is something I was wondering before... > > Thank you in advance. path of least resistance: upgrade everything. :-) sometimes it is easier to start from scratch with a CD or network install. --Apple-Mail-8--273185447-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 20:07:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9005316A4DD for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:07:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from todorov@paladin.bulgarpress.com) Received: from gregorian.transpress.bg (gregorian.transpress.bg [82.147.129.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A59143D46 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:07:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from todorov@paladin.bulgarpress.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by gregorian.transpress.bg (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA6B8F; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:10:15 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gregorian.transpress.bg Received: from gregorian.transpress.bg ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (gregorian.transpress.bg [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yOgAcSKxhA5h; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:10:12 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [192.168.6.8] (unknown [87.126.135.207]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gregorian.transpress.bg (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9EC885; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:10:12 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <44EB6411.4040406@paladin.bulgarpress.com> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:07:45 +0300 From: "Todorov @ Paladin" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vivek Khera References: <5B7BD83A-6316-4C20-903E-B5D66D4F2642@khera.org> <44EB5354.6070007@paladin.bulgarpress.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:07:54 -0000 Vivek Khera напиÑа: > > On Aug 22, 2006, at 2:56 PM, Todorov @ Paladin wrote: > >>> don't find this out the hard way :-( >>> >> How to find which is dynamically using libs and which application is >> not? >> >> This is something I was wondering before... >> >> Thank you in advance. > > path of least resistance: upgrade everything. :-) > > sometimes it is easier to start from scratch with a CD or network > install. > Something related to this topic - where are the options we choose for a specific port saved? Also - why portupgrade is not always aware of previously chosen options for a port build? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 20:36:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8716016A4DA for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:36:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bjordan@lumeta.com) Received: from MAIL.corp.lumeta.com (h65-246-245-23.lumeta.com [65.246.245.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC0F043D45 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:36:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bjordan@lumeta.com) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 16:36:15 -0400 Message-ID: <78ED28FACE63744386D68D8A9D1CF5D4104AC8@MAIL.corp.lumeta.com> In-Reply-To: <20060822192836.GA10176@host.fqdn.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: bce0: Error mapping mbuf into TX chain! Thread-Index: AcbGIYTHJctM7nydR3+sWsiIqkVqegACBs6w From: "Bucky Jordan" To: "Sam Eaton" , Cc: Subject: RE: bce0: Error mapping mbuf into TX chain! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:36:21 -0000 Sam, I'm also running the stock RELEASE kernel config- haven't had a chance to do a rebuild yet. But, I just noticed something interesting- the box has been running fine for several days with multiple ssh connections, and several large remote data loads (by way of postgres copy on port 5432). However, I just installed webmin, set it up to run HTTPS on port 9090, and as soon as I tried to connect- got the error. It does that every subsequent time too. I will try the latest from 6-stable, but if you're thinking a big src download from ports is high network io, well, lets just say the datasets I'm copying around tend to dwarf the bsd source tree ;) (typically they're several gb per dataset). So if that's still a problem I may be jumping out of the proverbial frying pan and into the fire.. Thanks, Bucky -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Sam Eaton Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 3:29 PM To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bce0: Error mapping mbuf into TX chain! On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 02:46:04PM -0400, Bucky Jordan wrote: > Sam, >=20 > I've got a PowerEdge 2950 with a DRAC 5 card, and I'm having what > appears to be the same set of issues. I'm running 6.1 amd64 RELEASE. >=20 > I've only gotten the " bce0: Error mapping mbuf into TX chain!" error a > few times now. Although the box isn't in production at the moment, we've > been sending quite a bit of data (several GB) across the interface > without a hitch (basically remote COPY statements for postgresql). It > sounds like your 1950 is/was having the issue more frequently (our 2950 > stays up for days at a time). The 'error mapping mbuf' error seems to have been fixed by the latest set of changes to if_bce.c - after upgrading to the latest stable, that problem stopped happening. =20 However, instead of that, under rather higher load, we now get the watchdog timer error instead. This is not good :) I can get it within minutes with something like building something big from ports, during the initial source download. > However, the fact that I do get the error every now and then is still a > concern, so I plan to rebuild world and kernel when I get the chance. >=20 > Please keep us posted on your findings, and if it'd be useful to have > another box to run tests on, I'd be happy to give it a go. I think moving to stable will fix the mbuf error for you, as that's what others report. You, and all the other reports I've seen have been running amd64, which I haven't been (I didn't build the box originally). I'll know tommorow if amd64 makes much of a difference or not. Oh, other info - I'm running the standard SMP kernel config with no modifications. Sam. --=20 "Fortified with Essential Bitterness and Sarcasm" Matt Groening, "Binky's Guide to Love". _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 22 22:27:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A636E16A4DD for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 22:27:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from postal1.es.net (postal1.es.net [198.128.3.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA4D43D49 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 22:27:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [198.128.4.29]) by postal1.es.net (Postal Node 2) with ESMTP (SSL) id AEX62112; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:27:12 -0700 Received: from ptavv.es.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id C52BE45055; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:27:11 -0700 (PDT) To: "Todorov @ Paladin" In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:07:45 +0300." <44EB6411.4040406@paladin.bulgarpress.com> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:27:11 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20060822222711.C52BE45055@ptavv.es.net> Cc: Vivek Khera , freebsd-stable Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 22:27:21 -0000 > Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:07:45 +0300 > From: "Todorov @ Paladin" > Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > > Vivek Khera напиÑа: > > > > On Aug 22, 2006, at 2:56 PM, Todorov @ Paladin wrote: > > > >>> don't find this out the hard way :-( > >>> > >> How to find which is dynamically using libs and which application is > >> not? > >> > >> This is something I was wondering before... > >> > >> Thank you in advance. > > > > path of least resistance: upgrade everything. :-) > > > > sometimes it is easier to start from scratch with a CD or network > > install. > > > Something related to this topic - where are the options we choose for a > specific port saved? Also - why portupgrade is not always aware of > previously chosen options for a port build? This is rather new and not as well publicized as it might have been. As ports are updated, configuration options are stored in /var/ports/PORTNAME/options. If you want to flush this for a port, 'make rmconfig' will do the job. You will be asked for options the next time you make the port, or you can 'make config' on a port to have it ask again. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 00:26:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B624E16A4DA for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:26:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mhunter@malcolm.berkeley.edu) Received: from malcolm.berkeley.edu (malcolm.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.206.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D73143D4C for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:26:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mhunter@malcolm.berkeley.edu) Received: from malcolm.berkeley.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by malcolm.berkeley.edu (8.13.6/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k7N0QDMl026211 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:26:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mhunter@malcolm.berkeley.edu) Received: (from mhunter@localhost) by malcolm.berkeley.edu (8.13.6/8.13.3/Submit) id k7N0QD8J026210; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:26:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mhunter) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:26:12 -0700 From: Mike Hunter To: Paul Koch Message-ID: <20060823002612.GB25269@malcolm.berkeley.edu> References: <20060818120041.024AA16A66B@hub.freebsd.org> <44E5F4F2.7030807@umn.edu> <200608191150.22128.paul.koch@statseeker.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608191150.22128.paul.koch@statseeker.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.6 (malcolm.berkeley.edu [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 22 Aug 2006 17:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Alan Amesbury , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD boots too fast on Dell PE850 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 00:26:14 -0000 On Aug 19 at 11:50, "Paul Koch" wrote: > The second problem we found was, various NICs would report that they > were "active" after doing auto negotiation, but no rx packets were > being passed into to the OS. Not sure if it was a hardware or driver > issue, but we discovered that by forcing a packet out the NIC via the > bpf interface, it would immediately start doing stuff. It was if the > auto negotiation had not really completed fully until a packet was > transmitted. This only occurred on certain types of NICs, the newer > ones. This was a problem for us because we build something called > a "remote network appliance" (RNA) which is basically FreeBSD on a > floppy and runs a statistical lan analyser. The RNA might have many > NICs in it, one with an IP, the others just connected to network > segments in promiscuous mode. Our apps couldn't monitor any traffic > because no packets had be sent out the interfaces. So, early in the > boot process we force out a couple of "Loopback" packets and everything > works just fine. > > Not sure if the second issue would be a problem for normal installations > though. I have a feeling this is related to windows; I recently watched a windows server boot with ethereal and it did an "arp x.x.x.x is-at a:b:c:d:e:f" (or 2 or 3) first thing (it had a static IP)...so of course a nic vendor would never realize there's a problem since they only test with windows....*sigh*. Not sure how DHCP would play into that. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 03:22:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C5E16A4E1 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 03:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from p1agu313@yahoo.com) Received: from web35501.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web35501.mail.mud.yahoo.com [66.163.179.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E29943D46 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 03:22:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from p1agu313@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 24319 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Aug 2006 03:22:03 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=bDEYfOLtGzQKAQI0oOvl7JA5cO9lLVv7fSFA4ya4TMqiajUptWg8jP7FZc1cW494jKRvS/aceUVSXZWKZkUCLsvx7ddvkz2NgaMVG6+vs+JGuIBxpMXoBBtvtk6/klPwde6fnfu5DuzYUH/pwMzU2TmGUpzalhzXEs6LnIZXBbk= ; Message-ID: <20060823032203.24317.qmail@web35501.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [65.19.28.24] by web35501.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:22:03 PDT Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 20:22:03 -0700 (PDT) From: "E. Gad" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Newbie here X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 03:22:04 -0000 Hi all, First let me say I'm a newbie (basicly)- I didn't know wich one of the freebsd mailing lists was better to ask questions on that may(or may not) be better someplace else. Anyway Just playing with freebsd 6 on a testing box. Upgraded l from 6.0 to 6.1 because it looked like popular opinion is that it's got a number of improvements after a few false starts and finally figuring what I did wrong it went basicly ok. Only now when I went to use sysinstall to install a few usefull looking items I run into "6.1.-p3 not found on server!" What's kind of puzling is if I do essentially the samething and run pkg_add --f from the command line many times it works. Is this normal? or did I do something wrong, and how do I fix it in either case? -thanks --------------------------------- Get your own web address for just $1.99/1st yr. We'll help. Yahoo! Small Business. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 03:36:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5F616A4E2 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 03:36:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joe@osoft.us) Received: from mail.osoft.us (osoft.us [67.14.192.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E14943D5A for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 03:36:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joe@osoft.us) Received: from [10.134.0.53] (ip-69-33-53-199.dfw.megapath.net [69.33.53.199]) by mail.osoft.us (Postfix) with ESMTP id 325A633C7B; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 22:36:56 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <44EBCD59.1060507@osoft.us> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 22:36:57 -0500 From: Joe Koberg User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Antony Mawer References: <44E47092.7050104@mawer.org> In-Reply-To: <44E47092.7050104@mawer.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The need for initialising disks before use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 03:36:58 -0000 Antony Mawer wrote: > > Is it recommended/required to do something like: > > dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad0 bs=1m > > before use to ensure the drive's sector remappings are all in place, > before then doing a newfs? It seems logical to read the whole device first with "conv=noerror" to be sure the drive has encountered and noted any correctable or uncorrectable errors present. Only then write the entire drive, allowing it to remap any noted bad sectors. i.e.: # dd if=/dev/ad0 of=/dev/null bs=64k conv=noerror # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad0 bs=64k The problem is that when dd hits the first bad sector, the whole 64k block containing the sector will be skipped. There could be more bad sectors there... or none... If you hit errors I would re-read the affected area with "bs=512" to get down to sector granularity. I seem to recall a utility posted to a freebsd mailing list some time ago that worked like dd(1), but would "divide and conquer" a block that returned with a read error. Intent being to get the job done fast with large blocks but still copy every sector possible off a failing drive by reducing to sector-sized blocks if necessary.... Unfortunately I can't find it now. Joe Koberg joe at osoft dot us From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 04:50:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C35916A4DA for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 04:50:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx24.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A04DD43D46 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 04:50:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 482 invoked by uid 399); 23 Aug 2006 04:50:24 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Aug 2006 04:50:24 -0000 Message-ID: <44EBDE8C.8010002@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 21:50:20 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060729) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "E. Gad" References: <20060823032203.24317.qmail@web35501.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060823032203.24317.qmail@web35501.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Newbie here X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 04:50:25 -0000 E. Gad wrote: > Hi all, First let me say I'm a newbie (basicly)- Welcome! > I didn't know wich one > of the freebsd mailing lists was better to ask questions on that may(or > may not) be better someplace else. It's always best to start on freebsd-questions@, and if your question belongs elsewhere, the people that read that list are generally pretty good about directing you. good luck, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 06:09:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2730E16A4DE for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:09:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kmacy@fsmware.com) Received: from demos.bsdclusters.com (demos.bsdclusters.com [69.55.225.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A510243D73 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:09:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kmacy@fsmware.com) Received: from demos.bsdclusters.com (demos [69.55.225.36]) by demos.bsdclusters.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k7N69ilZ054649; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:09:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kmacy@fsmware.com) Received: from localhost (kmacy@localhost) by demos.bsdclusters.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) with ESMTP id k7N69iDo054643; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:09:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Authentication-Warning: demos.bsdclusters.com: kmacy owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:09:44 -0700 (PDT) From: Kip Macy X-X-Sender: kmacy@demos.bsdclusters.com To: Jiawei Ye In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060822230917.O38889@demos.bsdclusters.com> References: <44E1F796.5070105@rogers.com> <20060815172728.GB88051@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Mike Jakubik , stable@freebsd.org, Dan Nelson Subject: Re: TOP shows above 100% WCPU usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:09:47 -0000 I've seen with libthr. What libraries are you using? -Kip On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, Jiawei Ye wrote: > On 8/16/06, Dan Nelson wrote: > > > How can mysql use 160%? Is this a reporting bug in top because mysql is > > > threaded? > > > > You have multiple CPUs, so a threaded process can theoretically reach > > 100*ncpus cpu usage. > > > > -- > > Dan Nelson > > dnelson@allantgroup.com > I am seeing this on a UP system too. > > last pid: 35355; load averages: 0.36, 0.08, 0.03 up 1+12:11:39 12:20:56 > 205 processes: 3 running, 202 sleeping > CPU states: 97.8% user, 0.0% nice, 1.5% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.7% idle > Mem: 122M Active, 52M Inact, 59M Wired, 7808K Cache, 34M Buf, 524K Free > Swap: 1024M Total, 40M Used, 984M Free, 3% Inuse > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND > 35343 www 22 4 0 275M 64620K accept 0:21 271.92% java > 767 jabber 1 91 0 8836K 1284K select 7:07 0.00% perl5.8.8 > 875 pgsql 1 91 0 19880K 1748K select 0:20 0.00% postgres > 840 vscan 1 4 0 22892K 18304K accept 0:17 0.00% clamd > 4733 www 27 4 0 17428K 3268K kqread 0:10 0.00% httpd > > -- > "Without the userland, the kernel is useless." > --inspired by The Tao of Programming > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 06:11:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B05616A4E0 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:11:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leafy7382@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3B743D5C for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:11:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leafy7382@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so47439pye for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:11:07 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=stVVL50NTCF8WkKDSFWMzMjynHK+iRG4flkE4fqS9RZ4nl1fdsLOwAMteOtN1NqHqeSQF/mD4INtOvJugG3bChTRVmD0B7porFdiubZPh2JJHpRhv/5z1CSnOZRGfEADvjMMEUyrBF9qDccQadWkzWD4Ad6VrQWq1D+AGwj/bHE= Received: by 10.35.36.13 with SMTP id o13mr17092265pyj; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:11:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.124.18 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Aug 2006 23:11:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 14:11:06 +0800 From: "Jiawei Ye" To: "Kip Macy" In-Reply-To: <20060822230917.O38889@demos.bsdclusters.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44E1F796.5070105@rogers.com> <20060815172728.GB88051@dan.emsphone.com> <20060822230917.O38889@demos.bsdclusters.com> Cc: Mike Jakubik , stable@freebsd.org, Dan Nelson Subject: Re: TOP shows above 100% WCPU usage X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 06:11:17 -0000 On 8/23/06, Kip Macy wrote: > I've seen with libthr. What libraries are you using? > > -Kip libthr :) Jiawei -- "Without the userland, the kernel is useless." --inspired by The Tao of Programming From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 08:01:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E24E16A4E5; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:01:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Received: from freebee.digiware.nl (www.tegenbosch28.nl [217.21.251.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EAB843D58; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:01:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Received: from [212.61.27.67] (opteron.digiware.nl [212.61.27.67]) by freebee.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FBB2AAA2; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:01:47 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:02:35 +0200 From: Willem Jan Withagen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org, amd64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:01:50 -0000 Hi, I've ran into sort of a snag with building a 2T file server. Given all the good press here for 3ware and the talk to the guys at the CeBIT I decided to go for a 9550SX-LP8. With that I bought a ASUS serverboard: K8N-LR with 165 dual core opteron. In itself is this a combo that I thing would do for a long time at my home. ;) However the 3ware controler decided not to play nice with 2 of the PCI-X boards I have here. It gets stuck in the bios disc scan. I've RMA-ed the card, but my guess is that it'll take a too long a time to fix/replace it for my patience. So I'm looking for alternatives with good support under amd64. I've seen that the Adaptecs are supported under aac(4). But what about Promisse or Highpoint RAID controllers? Thanx, --WjW From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 08:23:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD9916A4DF; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:23:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from multiplay.co.uk (core6.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44CBE43D45; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:23:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from vader ([85.236.96.60]) by multiplay.co.uk (multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v9.0.1) with ESMTP id md50002915570.msg; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:23:26 +0100 Message-ID: <003f01c6c68d$64688e60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Willem Jan Withagen" , , References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:23:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-Spam-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:23:26 +0100 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 85.236.96.60 X-Return-Path: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDAV-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:23:26 +0100 Cc: Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:23:56 -0000 The Areca cards I can recommend. Highpoint 1820a is surprisingly good for its price and the later cards have better performance still apparently. N.B. Use the min stripe size when creating the array for max performance with this card under FreeBSD. Steve Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > Hi, > > I've ran into sort of a snag with building a 2T file server. > Given all the good press here for 3ware and the talk to the guys at > the CeBIT I decided to go for a 9550SX-LP8. > With that I bought a ASUS serverboard: K8N-LR with 165 dual core > opteron. > > In itself is this a combo that I thing would do for a long time at my > home. ;) > > However the 3ware controler decided not to play nice with 2 of the > PCI-X boards I have here. It gets stuck in the bios disc scan. I've > RMA-ed the card, but my guess is that it'll take a too long a time to > fix/replace it for my patience. > > So I'm looking for alternatives with good support under amd64. I've > seen that the Adaptecs are supported under aac(4). But what about > Promisse or Highpoint RAID controllers? ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 09:28:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A4416A4DD for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:28:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregory@mdmspb.com) Received: from mail.mdmspb.com (mail.mdmspb.com [212.119.187.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF03143D7F for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:28:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gregory@mdmspb.com) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:28:29 +0400 From: "S.N.Grigoriev" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Organization: MDM-Bank SPb PLC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-fixed: Message-Id: <20060823092832.CF03143D7F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: "_malloc_prefork" not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:28:34 -0000 Hi All, I've updated from amd64 6.1-RELEASE to 6-STABLE. All works fine. The only problem: when xmms or firefox starts the following message appears: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /lib/libpthread.so.2: Undefined symbol "_malloc_prefork" The Ports tree is fresh. Both xmms and firefox have been rebuilt. Who knows what have I do to fix the problem? Thanks, Serguey. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 10:02:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D16016A4DF; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:02:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Received: from freebee.digiware.nl (www.tegenbosch28.nl [217.21.251.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31D3F43D69; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:01:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Received: from [212.61.27.67] (opteron.digiware.nl [212.61.27.67]) by freebee.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6555A2AAA0; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:01:58 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44EC27C7.8060906@withagen.nl> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:02:47 +0200 From: Willem Jan Withagen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Steven Hartland , stable@freebsd.org, amd64@freebsd.org References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <003f01c6c68d$64688e60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <003f01c6c68d$64688e60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:02:01 -0000 Steven Hartland wrote: > The Areca cards I can recommend. Highpoint 1820a is surprisingly good > for its price and the later cards have better performance still apparently. > N.B. Use the min stripe size when creating the array for max performance > with this card under FreeBSD. I was more thinking along the lines of a HighPoint 2720, but perhaps a 1820 would also do fine. What device driver would one use with that. [Ahhh, 'man -k highpoint' is your friend] Now what I liked about the 3ware stuff was that there are tools to work the raid from within FreeBSD. So that would require the newers ones... But the hardware list is only showing the 2320 and 2322 with a rr232x(4) driver. Which sort of makes me wonder for all the other stuff and their drivers. The motherboard has both PCI-X and PCI-E so that should not be a connector problem. Now which bus is faster: 64Bit PCI-X at 133 Mhz, or a PCI-E 16x? --WjW > Willem Jan Withagen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I've ran into sort of a snag with building a 2T file server. >> Given all the good press here for 3ware and the talk to the guys at >> the CeBIT I decided to go for a 9550SX-LP8. >> With that I bought a ASUS serverboard: K8N-LR with 165 dual core >> opteron. >> In itself is this a combo that I thing would do for a long time at my >> home. ;) >> However the 3ware controler decided not to play nice with 2 of the >> PCI-X boards I have here. It gets stuck in the bios disc scan. I've >> RMA-ed the card, but my guess is that it'll take a too long a time to >> fix/replace it for my patience. >> >> So I'm looking for alternatives with good support under amd64. I've >> seen that the Adaptecs are supported under aac(4). But what about >> Promisse or Highpoint RAID controllers? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 10:56:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279AA16A4F0; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:56:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from multiplay.co.uk (core6.multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4962D43E0C; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:53:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from vader ([85.236.96.60]) by multiplay.co.uk (multiplay.co.uk [85.236.96.23]) (MDaemon PRO v9.0.1) with ESMTP id md50002916117.msg; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:52:35 +0100 Message-ID: <009e01c6c6a2$3b6f2860$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Willem Jan Withagen" , , References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <003f01c6c68d$64688e60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <44EC27C7.8060906@withagen.nl> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:52:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2962 X-Spam-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:52:36 +0100 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 85.236.96.60 X-Return-Path: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDAV-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:52:37 +0100 Cc: Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:56:06 -0000 Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > Steven Hartland wrote: >> The Areca cards I can recommend. Highpoint 1820a is surprisingly good >> for its price and the later cards have better performance still >> apparently. N.B. Use the min stripe size when creating the array for >> max performance with this card under FreeBSD. > > I was more thinking along the lines of a HighPoint 2720, but perhaps > a 1820 would also do fine. What device driver would one use with that. I've had no direct experience with the newer cards I'm afraid so cant comment. If you go for the 1820 it must be the 1820a which is hardware raid vs the 1820 which is software. > [Ahhh, 'man -k highpoint' is your friend] > Now what I liked about the 3ware stuff was that there are tools to > work the raid from within FreeBSD. So that would require the newers > ones... All the tools for the 1820a work nicely under FreeBSD 6.1 :) > But the hardware list is only showing the 2320 and 2322 with a > rr232x(4) driver. Which sort of makes me wonder for all the other > stuff and their drivers. 232x has native support but I've never heard of the 2720 not even mentioned on their site 2220 perhaps? This has a driver for FreeBSD also including an open source version. > The motherboard has both PCI-X and PCI-E so that should not be a > connector problem. Now which bus is faster: 64Bit PCI-X at 133 Mhz, > or a PCI-E 16x? Not really the right question as most cards are only x1 PCI-E cards. That said I dont know for sure but I suspect they have very similar capabilites. Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone +44 845 868 1337 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 11:17:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0DCD16A4DE for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:17:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F49A43D7B for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:17:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.7/8.13.7/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id k7NBHetD020735; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 07:17:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 07:17:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: "S.N.Grigoriev" In-Reply-To: <20060823092832.CF03143D7F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <20060823092832.CF03143D7F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "_malloc_prefork" not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:17:44 -0000 On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, S.N.Grigoriev wrote: > Hi All, > > I've updated from amd64 6.1-RELEASE to 6-STABLE. > All works fine. The only problem: when xmms or > firefox starts the following message appears: > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /lib/libpthread.so.2: Undefined symbol "_malloc_prefork" > > The Ports tree is fresh. Both xmms and firefox have been rebuilt. > Who knows what have I do to fix the problem? Your system is not consistent. There is no _malloc_prefork() (or _malloc_foofork()) in -stable; it only exists in -current. You've got -current libraries (at least libpthread) on -stable. libpthread is installed in /usr/lib in RELENG_6, not /lib. So if you've downgraded from -current, you'll need to remove the -current libraries that have different locations in RELENG_6 (no, I don't think there is an automated way to do this). -- DE From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 12:02:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBDA16A4DF; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:02:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from flpvm23.prodigy.net (flpvm23.prodigy.net [207.115.20.53]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF73743D92; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:02:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) X-ORBL: [66.136.206.1] Received: from maul.immure.com (adsl-66-136-206-1.dsl.austtx.swbell.net [66.136.206.1]) by flpvm23.prodigy.net (8.13.7 out spool5000 dk/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7NC1tZb005598; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 05:01:58 -0700 Received: from rancor.immure.com (rancor.immure.com [10.1.132.9]) by maul.immure.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7NC1lSw093762; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 07:01:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7NC1lnG021724; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 07:01:47 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k7NC1kLn021723; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 07:01:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 07:01:46 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: Willem Jan Withagen Message-ID: <20060823120146.GA21578@rancor.immure.com> References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <003f01c6c68d$64688e60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <44EC27C7.8060906@withagen.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44EC27C7.8060906@withagen.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-immure-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-immure-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-immure-MailScanner-From: bob@immure.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, Steven Hartland Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bob Willcox List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:02:32 -0000 On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:02:47PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > Steven Hartland wrote: > >The Areca cards I can recommend. Highpoint 1820a is surprisingly good > >for its price and the later cards have better performance still apparently. > >N.B. Use the min stripe size when creating the array for max performance > >with this card under FreeBSD. > > I was more thinking along the lines of a HighPoint 2720, but perhaps a 1820 > would also do fine. What device driver would one use with that. > > [Ahhh, 'man -k highpoint' is your friend] > Now what I liked about the 3ware stuff was that there are tools to work the > raid from within FreeBSD. So that would require the newers ones... > > But the hardware list is only showing the 2320 and 2322 with a rr232x(4) > driver. Which sort of makes me wonder for all the other stuff and their > drivers. > > The motherboard has both PCI-X and PCI-E so that should not be a connector > problem. Now which bus is faster: 64Bit PCI-X at 133 Mhz, or a PCI-E 16x? The x16 PCI-E has considerably faster theoretical speed than 133 PCI-X (appx. 4GBs vs. 1GBs). However, the RAID controllers that I've seen are at most x8 so they are only capable of transfer rates half that fast (2GBs). Personally, I would go with PCI-E since in some performance tests I did with Areca cards last year (both PCI-E and PCI-X) there appeared to be a slight performance advantage to the PCI-E cards (sorry, I don't recall any of the specifics anymore, so please take that for what it's worth). BTW, I've had good experience with the Areca cards in FreeBSD (recent stable). Bob > > --WjW > > >Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>I've ran into sort of a snag with building a 2T file server. > >>Given all the good press here for 3ware and the talk to the guys at > >>the CeBIT I decided to go for a 9550SX-LP8. > >>With that I bought a ASUS serverboard: K8N-LR with 165 dual core > >>opteron. > >>In itself is this a combo that I thing would do for a long time at my > >>home. ;) > >>However the 3ware controler decided not to play nice with 2 of the > >>PCI-X boards I have here. It gets stuck in the bios disc scan. I've > >>RMA-ed the card, but my guess is that it'll take a too long a time to > >>fix/replace it for my patience. > >> > >>So I'm looking for alternatives with good support under amd64. I've > >>seen that the Adaptecs are supported under aac(4). But what about > >>Promisse or Highpoint RAID controllers? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Bob Willcox Possessions increase to fill the space bob@immure.com available for their storage. Austin, TX -- Ryan From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 12:22:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8296216A4E0; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:22:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (relay0.rambler.ru [81.19.66.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB3443D55; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:22:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8875D0B; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:22:28 +0400 (MSD) Received: from edoofus.park.rambler.ru (unknown [81.19.65.108]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F4A5CED; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:22:28 +0400 (MSD) Received: (from ru@localhost) by edoofus.park.rambler.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) id k7NCMT0c075227; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:22:29 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ru) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:22:29 +0400 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: "S.N.Grigoriev" Message-ID: <20060823122229.GB75101@rambler-co.ru> References: <20060823092832.CF03143D7F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gj572EiMnwbLXET9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-Virus-Scanned: No virus found Cc: Daniel Eischen , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "_malloc_prefork" not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:22:33 -0000 --gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 07:17:40AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > Your system is not consistent. There is no _malloc_prefork() > (or _malloc_foofork()) in -stable; it only exists in -current. > You've got -current libraries (at least libpthread) on -stable. > libpthread is installed in /usr/lib in RELENG_6, not /lib. > So if you've downgraded from -current, you'll need to remove > the -current libraries that have different locations in > RELENG_6 (no, I don't think there is an automated way to do > this). >=20 We don't provide any convenience scripts for downgrades. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE7EiFqRfpzJluFF4RAsazAJsEvZwtlqdswdpFEy5ssA3TrdGhfwCgl7Yy tQM/lAuS0GYwaVyPHuDdvgk= =FyVy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gj572EiMnwbLXET9-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 15:05:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C0A16A4DA; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:05:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregm@econet.com) Received: from hubble.sl.econet.com (hubble.sl.econet.com [65.170.12.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC8243D46; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:05:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gregm@econet.com) Received: from exchdal02.ecolan.econet.com (exchdal02.ecolan.econet.com [192.168.32.15]) by hubble.sl.econet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 251FF8FC20; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:05:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: from gregm-workstation by 192.168.32.15; 23 Aug 2006 10:05:18 -0500 From: Greg Martin To: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060823120146.GA21578@rancor.immure.com> References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <003f01c6c68d$64688e60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <44EC27C7.8060906@withagen.nl> <20060823120146.GA21578@rancor.immure.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:05:18 -0500 Message-Id: <1156345518.15990.1.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at econet.com Cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:05:19 -0000 I find it hard to believe nobody has mentioned 3ware, they are a bit more expensive but you pay for top notch quality, stability... Their newer cards support PCI-X and SATA II /w hotswap. -Greg From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 15:14:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D2616A4E2; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:14:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Received: from freebee.digiware.nl (www.tegenbosch28.nl [217.21.251.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D38843D77; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:14:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Received: from [212.61.27.67] (opteron.digiware.nl [212.61.27.67]) by freebee.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AECE2AAA0; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:14:36 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44EC710D.8020005@withagen.nl> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:15:25 +0200 From: Willem Jan Withagen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Martin References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <003f01c6c68d$64688e60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <44EC27C7.8060906@withagen.nl> <20060823120146.GA21578@rancor.immure.com> <1156345518.15990.1.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1156345518.15990.1.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:14:38 -0000 Greg Martin wrote: > I find it hard to believe nobody has mentioned 3ware, they are a bit > more expensive but you pay for top notch quality, stability... > > Their newer cards support PCI-X and SATA II /w hotswap. Well the message started by saying that I got caught by a 3ware card that did not want to play nice with me..... So I guess nobody deared suggesting another 3ware card. ;) --WjW From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 15:40:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B43316A4DA for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:40:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from flpi102.sbcis.sbc.com (flpi102.sbcis.sbc.com [207.115.20.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF24643D60 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:39:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) X-ORBL: [66.136.206.1] Received: from maul.immure.com (adsl-66-136-206-1.dsl.austtx.swbell.net [66.136.206.1]) by flpi102.sbcis.sbc.com (8.13.7 out spool5000 dk/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7NFdnjo021062 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:39:50 -0700 Received: from rancor.immure.com (rancor.immure.com [10.1.132.9]) by maul.immure.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7NFdk7u096761 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:39:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7NFdklI023049 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:39:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k7NFdkSl023048 for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:39:46 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from bob) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:39:46 -0500 From: Bob Willcox To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060823153946.GC22563@rancor.immure.com> References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <003f01c6c68d$64688e60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <44EC27C7.8060906@withagen.nl> <20060823120146.GA21578@rancor.immure.com> <1156345518.15990.1.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1156345518.15990.1.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-immure-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-immure-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-immure-MailScanner-From: bob@immure.com X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bob Willcox List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:40:02 -0000 On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 10:05:18AM -0500, Greg Martin wrote: > I find it hard to believe nobody has mentioned 3ware, they are a bit > more expensive but you pay for top notch quality, stability... > > Their newer cards support PCI-X and SATA II /w hotswap. BTW, just as a data point, my Areca controller (ARC-1210) has on several occasions demonstrated it's ability to recover nicely from drive failures. One of my Maxtor disks has this bad habit of periodically hanging. Popping the drive out and putting it back in causes the controller to immediately notice it and begin an automatic background rebuild (its a RAID5 configuration w/four 500GB disks). The rebuild takes about three hours to complete (on an unloaded system). Bob > > > -Greg > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Bob Willcox Possessions increase to fill the space bob@immure.com available for their storage. Austin, TX -- Ryan From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 15:46:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DBC16A4DF; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:46:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregm@econet.com) Received: from hubble.sl.econet.com (hubble.sl.econet.com [65.170.12.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9129D43D5F; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:46:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gregm@econet.com) Received: from exchdal02.ecolan.econet.com (exchdal02.ecolan.econet.com [192.168.32.15]) by hubble.sl.econet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3A38FC20; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:45:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from gregm-workstation by 192.168.32.15; 23 Aug 2006 10:45:58 -0500 From: Greg Martin To: Willem Jan Withagen In-Reply-To: <44EC710D.8020005@withagen.nl> References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <003f01c6c68d$64688e60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <44EC27C7.8060906@withagen.nl> <20060823120146.GA21578@rancor.immure.com> <1156345518.15990.1.camel@localhost> <44EC710D.8020005@withagen.nl> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:45:58 -0500 Message-Id: <1156347958.15990.10.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.1 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at econet.com Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:46:01 -0000 > Well the message started by saying that I got caught by a 3ware card that did > not want to play nice with me..... > So I guess nobody deared suggesting another 3ware card. > ;) My apologies, I now understand its a hardware issue. Before you toss the 3ware completely try the following (although I am sure you have) 1. Force PCI-x 64bit in the bios on the slot 2. Disable APIC or force old APIC mode 3. Disable onboard raid and/or SATA controller if its avail. My experience with some boards you really have to tweak around to get pci-x going. Sorry if I've wasted your time ! -Greg From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 15:46:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA70E16A4DA for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:46:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF5B343D6A for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:46:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so145016wxd for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:46:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=AHYeQGZh6Ctsa7LzooVbeHEd+JJMdtO8WlVkn8rqawSrVoLjr84bYbLBRSevP5loC/rk7UjCZi2+fKqzYqs38c10iuJzq3UGs50fbu7b0y2XrQZRGg2iGIjefaPGkBwK90O2V1Mmb+gaTK9Fw27/xn7QIABRBExn3dA5VKQllbw= Received: by 10.70.13.1 with SMTP id 1mr712803wxm; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:46:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.49.3 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 08:46:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 10:46:55 -0500 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Willem Jan Withagen" In-Reply-To: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:46:58 -0000 On 8/23/06, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > Hi, > > I've ran into sort of a snag with building a 2T file server. > Given all the good press here for 3ware and the talk to the guys at the CeBIT > I decided to go for a 9550SX-LP8. > With that I bought a ASUS serverboard: K8N-LR with 165 dual core opteron. > > In itself is this a combo that I thing would do for a long time at my home. ;) > > However the 3ware controler decided not to play nice with 2 of the PCI-X > boards I have here. It gets stuck in the bios disc scan. > Disable int 13. The card is probably trying to load it's boot BIOS and another card is interfering with it... I had a Promise card that loved to f**k with my HighPoint controller. The solution to the problem was disabling int 13 on the HighPoint card by re-flashing the cards BIOS with a special switch set, I didn't need to boot from this card anyways. > So I'm looking for alternatives with good support under amd64. I've seen that > the Adaptecs are supported under aac(4). But what about Promisse or Highpoint > RAID controllers? > Stay away from Adaptec and Promise because they don't support FreeBSD. I would recommend Areca and/or HighPoint because they do officially support FreeBSD. 3Ware does support FreeBSD but I don't have experience with their cards so I can't say anything good or bad about them. If you want to go 64-bit Areca drivers are open source and the FreeBSD man page states that they work on amd64. -- BSD Podcasts @: http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/ http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 15:53:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2F516A4DF; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:53:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Received: from freebee.digiware.nl (www.tegenbosch28.nl [217.21.251.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D7243D70; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:52:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Received: from [212.61.27.67] (opteron.digiware.nl [212.61.27.67]) by freebee.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327552AAA2; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:52:57 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44EC7A0A.2070009@withagen.nl> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 17:53:46 +0200 From: Willem Jan Withagen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Martin References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <003f01c6c68d$64688e60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <44EC27C7.8060906@withagen.nl> <20060823120146.GA21578@rancor.immure.com> <1156345518.15990.1.camel@localhost> <44EC710D.8020005@withagen.nl> <1156347958.15990.10.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1156347958.15990.10.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 15:53:00 -0000 Greg Martin wrote: >> Well the message started by saying that I got caught by a 3ware card that did >> not want to play nice with me..... >> So I guess nobody deared suggesting another 3ware card. >> ;) > > My apologies, I now understand its a hardware issue. Before you toss > the 3ware completely try the following (although I am sure you have) > > 1. Force PCI-x 64bit in the bios on the slot > 2. Disable APIC or force old APIC mode > 3. Disable onboard raid and/or SATA controller if its avail. > > My experience with some boards you really have to tweak around to get > pci-x going. Thanx for the usefull suggestions. However: I've already returned the board to the supplier after I fiddled for about a day with the bios. Which was very cumbersome, since every change required: power off remove card power on change bios power off insert card power on test..... En start all over. --WjW From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 16:13:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D10E616A4DE for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:13:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0090F43D45 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:13:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so152358wxd for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:13:37 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=ZSyE7HCEEmmB2iM5mAvryCZcz3/brW90h90bymbMUlz+G2kKqo9WAGfSrxcWHMUjs9GWxlOGQcjv8wg9RlfBrB0k9mSIqb7anFoOZKqdNcJeVyfuw5QlqUEFgFrDxYn83xODX+Aoo7yruSRxvleEUeGLf7x3fe/x4bX6YVoPnDQ= Received: by 10.70.89.1 with SMTP id m1mr814382wxb; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:13:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.49.3 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:13:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:13:37 -0500 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Bob Willcox" In-Reply-To: <20060823120146.GA21578@rancor.immure.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <003f01c6c68d$64688e60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <44EC27C7.8060906@withagen.nl> <20060823120146.GA21578@rancor.immure.com> Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, Steven Hartland Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:13:38 -0000 On 8/23/06, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:02:47PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > > Steven Hartland wrote: > > >The Areca cards I can recommend. Highpoint 1820a is surprisingly good > > >for its price and the later cards have better performance still apparently. > > >N.B. Use the min stripe size when creating the array for max performance > > >with this card under FreeBSD. > > > > I was more thinking along the lines of a HighPoint 2720, but perhaps a 1820 > > would also do fine. What device driver would one use with that. > > > > [Ahhh, 'man -k highpoint' is your friend] > > Now what I liked about the 3ware stuff was that there are tools to work the > > raid from within FreeBSD. So that would require the newers ones... > > > > But the hardware list is only showing the 2320 and 2322 with a rr232x(4) > > driver. Which sort of makes me wonder for all the other stuff and their > > drivers. > > > > The motherboard has both PCI-X and PCI-E so that should not be a connector > > problem. Now which bus is faster: 64Bit PCI-X at 133 Mhz, or a PCI-E 16x? > > The x16 PCI-E has considerably faster theoretical speed than 133 PCI-X > (appx. 4GBs vs. 1GBs). However, the RAID controllers that I've seen are > at most x8 so they are only capable of transfer rates half that fast > (2GBs). Personally, I would go with PCI-E since in some performance > tests I did with Areca cards last year (both PCI-E and PCI-X) there > appeared to be a slight performance advantage to the PCI-E cards (sorry, > I don't recall any of the specifics anymore, so please take that for > what it's worth). > I agree. PCIe 8x is a faster bus and it's typically connected directly to the MCH (north bridge) unlike PCI-X which is stuck on the ICH (south bridge). Also the 2GB/s that was quoted for PCIe 8x is it's one-way data rate "after" calculating in overhead. It's a dual simplex interface meaning it has one path to send data and another path to receive data. Imagine a simple two lane road. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 16:36:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B48516A4DD for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:36:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.233]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5C343D73 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:36:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so158471wxd for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:36:08 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nc+LtHJOfw6q2PN8KKbsNA2XXcabC/J+Pbrz4LX2UHkh4PMcUSqBKIk1qiRAb9TYHKC7dtqi3QlDUGnIVJGyYev87yxwFHvutptTuzZEQFd9n94YhCcn/Gw0enGaMUoJsAi1jep0gJ3ahIhg4NojGepFwypYENy1DyDcfAqcdgw= Received: by 10.70.78.4 with SMTP id a4mr780119wxb; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:34:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.49.3 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:34:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 11:34:18 -0500 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Bob Willcox" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <003f01c6c68d$64688e60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <44EC27C7.8060906@withagen.nl> <20060823120146.GA21578@rancor.immure.com> Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, Steven Hartland Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:36:15 -0000 On 8/23/06, Nikolas Britton wrote: > On 8/23/06, Bob Willcox wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 12:02:47PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: > > > Steven Hartland wrote: > > > >The Areca cards I can recommend. Highpoint 1820a is surprisingly good > > > >for its price and the later cards have better performance still apparently. > > > >N.B. Use the min stripe size when creating the array for max performance > > > >with this card under FreeBSD. > > > > > > I was more thinking along the lines of a HighPoint 2720, but perhaps a 1820 > > > would also do fine. What device driver would one use with that. > > > > > > [Ahhh, 'man -k highpoint' is your friend] > > > Now what I liked about the 3ware stuff was that there are tools to work the > > > raid from within FreeBSD. So that would require the newers ones... > > > > > > But the hardware list is only showing the 2320 and 2322 with a rr232x(4) > > > driver. Which sort of makes me wonder for all the other stuff and their > > > drivers. > > > > > > The motherboard has both PCI-X and PCI-E so that should not be a connector > > > problem. Now which bus is faster: 64Bit PCI-X at 133 Mhz, or a PCI-E 16x? > > > > The x16 PCI-E has considerably faster theoretical speed than 133 PCI-X > > (appx. 4GBs vs. 1GBs). However, the RAID controllers that I've seen are > > at most x8 so they are only capable of transfer rates half that fast > > (2GBs). Personally, I would go with PCI-E since in some performance > > tests I did with Areca cards last year (both PCI-E and PCI-X) there > > appeared to be a slight performance advantage to the PCI-E cards (sorry, > > I don't recall any of the specifics anymore, so please take that for > > what it's worth). > > > > I agree. PCIe 8x is a faster bus and it's typically connected directly > to the MCH (north bridge) unlike PCI-X which is stuck on the ICH > (south bridge). Also the 2GB/s that was quoted for PCIe 8x is it's > one-way data rate "after" calculating in overhead. It's a dual simplex > interface meaning it has one path to send data and another path to > receive data. Imagine a simple two lane road. > I take that back. For PCIe 8x imagine a divided highway with 8 lanes in each direction. The speed limit for each lane of traffic is 250MegaBytes/sec. So if you can move 8 semi-trucks filled with data in parallel your effective data rate is 2GigaBytes/sec. simple eh? :-) -- BSD Podcasts @: http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/ http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 19:00:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD80216A4E1 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:00:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msch@snafu.de) Received: from daiquiri.visp.de (daiquiri.visp.de [84.23.254.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95DD143D68 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:00:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msch@snafu.de) X-Trace: 507c6d73636840736e6166752e64657c38342e3139302e3138362e3134307c3147 467878532d30303044494f2d39547c31313536333539363130 Received: from daiquiri.visp.de ([10.156.10.19] helo=localhost) by daiquiri.visp.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 id 1GFxxS-000DIO-9T) for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:00:10 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org From: Matthias Schuendehuette Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:00:02 +0200 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Subject: Junk Pointer Error X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:00:17 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I compiled net/krb5 today on my 6.1-STABLE machine. As I tried to initialize Kerberos with '/usr/local/bin/kinit @ I got the following error: kinit in free(): error: junk pointer, too high to make sense Abort trap: 6 (core dumped) The same programs on my FreeBSD 5.5-RELEASE server run OK without such an error. 'smbd' died with the same error later on... This is a severe problem since I have to use MIT-Kerberos to connect to our AD-Domain... Is there something I can do to avoid this problem? Matthew - -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette , Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at and ID: 0xDDFB0A5F -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFE7KW3f1BNcN37Cl8RAl3fAJsEtqiV7ttVyUruuEkWsZ130kyV0QCdHF7N BkxAziq+7G6A/WtnSZkQNjo= =FElW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 19:25:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE2216A4DA for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:25:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9C743D49 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:25:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin03-en2 [10.13.10.148]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout13/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k7NJPL8r028062; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:25:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [17.214.14.142] (a17-214-14-142.apple.com [17.214.14.142]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin03/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k7NJP6JJ003671; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:25:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <518C224A-A45F-445B-AA2D-50456CBBF7DF@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 12:25:05 -0700 To: Matthias Schuendehuette X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAA+k= X-Language-Identified: TRUE Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Junk Pointer Error X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:25:23 -0000 On Aug 23, 2006, at 12:00 PM, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: > I compiled net/krb5 today on my 6.1-STABLE machine. As I tried to > initialize Kerberos with '/usr/local/bin/kinit @ I > got the following error: > > kinit in free(): error: junk pointer, too high to make sense > Abort trap: 6 (core dumped) Sure your hardware is OK? Try running memtest86 or a hardware diagnostic from your vendor, and double-check your fans & PSU... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 19:33:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EFA16A4DD for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:33:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (relay0.rambler.ru [81.19.66.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8BA143D45 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:33:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9046D5E17; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:33:08 +0400 (MSD) Received: from edoofus.park.rambler.ru (unknown [81.19.65.108]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C79C5E11; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:33:08 +0400 (MSD) Received: (from ru@localhost) by edoofus.park.rambler.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) id k7NJX9wQ078002; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:33:09 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ru) Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:33:09 +0400 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: "Todorov @ Paladin" Message-ID: <20060823193309.GA77890@rambler-co.ru> References: <5B7BD83A-6316-4C20-903E-B5D66D4F2642@khera.org> <44EB5354.6070007@paladin.bulgarpress.com> <44EB6411.4040406@paladin.bulgarpress.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44EB6411.4040406@paladin.bulgarpress.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-Virus-Scanned: No virus found Cc: Vivek Khera , freebsd-stable Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:33:10 -0000 --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:07:45PM +0300, Todorov @ Paladin wrote: > Also - why portupgrade is not always aware of > previously chosen options for a port build? >=20 It depends. If options are OPTIONS (in the ports sense), they are saved and independent of portupgrade. If options are makefile options specified in pkgtools.conf, they are only taken into accont if the port is (re)build explicitly; they are not taken into account if a port is (re)built as a dependency of another port. In plain text: if port B has options in pkgtools.conf, and port A has B as its dependency, and you portinstall/portupgrade A, B will be built (if needs be) without pkgtools.conf options. Be careful. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE7K11qRfpzJluFF4RAmX1AJ9KtZT8OHYim8B/7PELDle+92bBFwCfaIMj GiLmqc1EIjl+rh8JjXX1w44= =cwIy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 19:54:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25B316A4DE for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:54:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msch@snafu.de) Received: from daiquiri.visp.de (daiquiri.visp.de [84.23.254.156]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C02B943D78 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:54:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msch@snafu.de) X-Trace: 507c6d73636840736e6166752e64657c38342e3139302e3138362e3134307c3147 46796e6c2d3030303851712d545a7c31313536333632383534 Received: from daiquiri.visp.de ([10.156.10.19] helo=localhost) by daiquiri.visp.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 id 1GFynl-0008Qq-TZ); Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:54:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: <518C224A-A45F-445B-AA2D-50456CBBF7DF@mac.com> References: <518C224A-A45F-445B-AA2D-50456CBBF7DF@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <9660F7CB-DDF2-40E5-975F-AF8A46DCCFED@snafu.de> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matthias Schuendehuette Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 21:54:05 +0200 To: Chuck Swiger X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Junk Pointer Error X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 19:54:23 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Chuck, Am 23.08.2006 um 21:25 schrieb Chuck Swiger: > Sure your hardware is OK? Try running memtest86 or a hardware > diagnostic from your vendor, and double-check your fans & PSU... Hmm, I fear I'm never sure... But I'll try to compile krb5 on my laptop - a different machine, which should not have the same memory problems... - -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette , Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at and ID: 0xDDFB0A5F -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFE7LJif1BNcN37Cl8RAim+AJ9GJunF0IbmK/GY7IYP8HJEQjXIqgCePLeq hozJGAlpjr1EQGKe8bQw6Tk= =1FCe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 20:51:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CC616A4E1 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:51:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx24.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A61E43D49 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:51:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 6722 invoked by uid 399); 23 Aug 2006 20:51:56 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.3?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 23 Aug 2006 20:51:56 -0000 Message-ID: <44ECBFE8.7000809@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 13:51:52 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060729) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Ermilov References: <5B7BD83A-6316-4C20-903E-B5D66D4F2642@khera.org> <44EB5354.6070007@paladin.bulgarpress.com> <44EB6411.4040406@paladin.bulgarpress.com> <20060823193309.GA77890@rambler-co.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060823193309.GA77890@rambler-co.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Vivek Khera , "Todorov @ Paladin" , freebsd-stable Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:51:59 -0000 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:07:45PM +0300, Todorov @ Paladin wrote: >> Also - why portupgrade is not always aware of >> previously chosen options for a port build? >> > It depends. If options are OPTIONS (in the ports sense), they > are saved and independent of portupgrade. If options are > makefile options specified in pkgtools.conf, they are only > taken into accont if the port is (re)build explicitly; they > are not taken into account if a port is (re)built as a > dependency of another port. In plain text: if port B has > options in pkgtools.conf, and port A has B as its dependency, > and you portinstall/portupgrade A, B will be built (if needs > be) without pkgtools.conf options. Be careful. sysutils/portconf does not have that limitation. If you specify flags using that method, they will always be used. FYI, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 23:41:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC01716A4DE for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:41:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from core.byshenk.net (core.byshenk.net [62.58.73.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2EB43D45 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:41:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from core.byshenk.net (localhost.aoes.com [127.0.0.1]) by core.byshenk.net (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7NNfSHC002496 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 01:41:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from byshenknet@core.byshenk.net) Received: (from byshenknet@localhost) by core.byshenk.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k7NNfScs002495 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 01:41:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from byshenknet) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 01:41:28 +0200 From: Greg Byshenk To: freebsd-stable Message-ID: <20060823234128.GM633@core.byshenk.net> References: <5B7BD83A-6316-4C20-903E-B5D66D4F2642@khera.org> <44EB5354.6070007@paladin.bulgarpress.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=failed version=3.1.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.4 (2006-07-25) on core.byshenk.net Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:41:31 -0000 On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 12:23:00PM -0700, Chuck Swiger wrote: > In practice, however, pretty much all software nowadays depends on > shared libraries, so it's reasonable to do a "pkg_delete -a" after > upgrading to a new major version of FreeBSD, and then reinstall all > of the ports you use once you've finished upgrading. Run "pkg_info" > before the upgrade and keep track of this output to help you remember > what ports you've got installed... As a possible point of clarification, my comments earlier (and, I suspect similar comments of others) were not meant to imply that one should not rebuild ports after a major upgrade, but only that one need not do so _before_ upgrading. [...probably ... it worked for me ... YMMV ... if it is a critical package, then it wouldn't hurt to rebuild it first ... usw.] -- greg byshenk - gbyshenk@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 23 23:50:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9054216A4E1 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:50:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.177]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BBB43D45 for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:50:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from mac.com (smtpin04-en2 [10.13.10.149]) by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/8.12.11/smtpout07/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k7NNnwnA008670; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:50:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [17.214.14.142] (a17-214-14-142.apple.com [17.214.14.142]) (authenticated bits=0) by mac.com (Xserve/smtpin04/MantshX 4.0) with ESMTP id k7NNntZo025676; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:49:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20060823234128.GM633@core.byshenk.net> References: <5B7BD83A-6316-4C20-903E-B5D66D4F2642@khera.org> <44EB5354.6070007@paladin.bulgarpress.com> <20060823234128.GM633@core.byshenk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <303DAF81-4976-44DE-83C3-5E1655E85144@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Chuck Swiger Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 16:49:55 -0700 To: Greg Byshenk X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAQAAA+k= X-Language-Identified: TRUE Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:50:23 -0000 On Aug 23, 2006, at 4:41 PM, Greg Byshenk wrote: > As a possible point of clarification, my comments earlier (and, I > suspect similar comments of others) were not meant to imply that one > should not rebuild ports after a major upgrade, but only that one need > not do so _before_ upgrading. > > [...probably ... it worked for me ... YMMV ... if it is a critical > package, then it wouldn't hurt to rebuild it first ... usw.] Oh, certainly-- FreeBSD's COMPAT stuff will let you run binaries compiled against an older version of FreeBSD just fine for almost all circumstances. However, as soon as you try to install a new port which depends on something already installed, or upgrade anything, you pretty much really need to upgrade *everything* to be sure that you don't compile new executables which depend on a mixture of COMPAT and current libraries... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 04:07:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEEC416A4DF for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 04:07:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from helge.oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: from mizar.origin-it.net (mail.de.atosorigin.com [194.8.96.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0683C43D45 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 04:07:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from helge.oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: from matar.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com (dehsfw3e.origin-it.net [194.8.96.68]) by mizar.origin-it.net (8.13.6/8.13.6/hmo020206) with ESMTP id k7O47lYf062028 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:07:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from helge.oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: from galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com (galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com [161.89.20.4]) by matar.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/hmo020206) with ESMTP id k7O47ll6041256; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:07:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from helge.oldach@atosorigin.com) Received: (from hmo@localhost) by galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com (8.9.3p2/8.9.3/hmo30mar03) id GAA27277; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:07:46 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200608240407.GAA27277@galaxy.hbg.de.ao-srv.com> In-Reply-To: <303DAF81-4976-44DE-83C3-5E1655E85144@mac.com> from Chuck Swiger at "Aug 23, 2006 4:49:55 pm" To: cswiger@mac.com (Chuck Swiger) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:07:46 +0200 (MET DST) From: Helge Oldach X-Address: Atos Origin GmbH, Friesenstraße 13, D-20097 Hamburg, Germany X-Phone: +49 40 7886 7464, Fax: +49 40 7886 9464, Mobile: +49 160 4782077 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd@byshenk.net Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 04:07:56 -0000 Chuck Swiger: >FreeBSD's COMPAT stuff will let you run binaries >compiled against an older version of FreeBSD just fine for almost all >circumstances. However, as soon as you try to install a new port >which depends on something already installed, or upgrade anything, >you pretty much really need to upgrade *everything* to be sure that >you don't compile new executables which depend on a mixture of COMPAT >and current libraries... Yep. Also beware of "make delete-old" and "make delete-old-libs", and ports that build differently depending on the OS version... Helge From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 05:40:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C879716A4DE; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 05:40:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079F443D45; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 05:40:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k7O5e43L069935 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:40:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) with UUCP id k7O5e4BI069933; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:40:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: from titan.klemm.apsfilter.org (localhost.klemm.apsfilter.org [127.0.0.1]) by klemm.apsfilter.org (8.13.6/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7O5aJi6007421; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:36:19 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by titan.klemm.apsfilter.org (8.13.6/8.13.4/Submit) id k7O5aIQp007420; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:36:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from andreas) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:36:18 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm To: stable@freebsd.org, amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060824053618.GA7211@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <003f01c6c68d$64688e60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <003f01c6c68d$64688e60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 05:40:07 -0000 On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:23:00AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > The Areca cards I can recommend. Highpoint 1820a is surprisingly good Many many years ago I bought a HighPoint HPT366 ATA66 controller. Thought its a good deal because it was cheap. Thought, an ATA interface can't be that complicated anymore so that its safe to buy a cheap product. Turned out that I was very wrong with my theorie. I ran into timeout problems, that couldn't be fixed. After days and nights of troubleshooting and testing I didn't get it to work reliably. I replaced it by buying a more expensive Promise controller. Since then I had zero problems. Since that time I lost trust in HighPoint products. Good stuff has its price. It must not always be the most expensive hardware. But going with the cheapest (and I assume the HighPoint product will again be in the low price segment) can be troublesome. Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm - Powered by FreeBSD 6 Need a magic printfilter today ? -> http://www.apsfilter.org/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 05:52:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0E816A4DE; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 05:52:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gregory@mdmspb.com) Received: from mail.mdmspb.com (mail.mdmspb.com [212.119.187.251]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6819E43D46; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 05:52:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gregory@mdmspb.com) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:52:55 +0400 From: "S.N.Grigoriev" To: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <20060823092832.CF03143D7F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Organization: MDM-Bank SPb PLC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-fixed: Message-Id: <20060824055258.6819E43D46@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: Daniel Eischen Subject: Re: "_malloc_prefork" not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 05:52:59 -0000 On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 07:17:40 -0400 (EDT) Daniel Eischen wrote: > On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, S.N.Grigoriev wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I've updated from amd64 6.1-RELEASE to 6-STABLE. > > All works fine. The only problem: when xmms or > > firefox starts the following message appears: > > > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /lib/libpthread.so.2: Undefined symbol "_malloc_prefork" > > > > The Ports tree is fresh. Both xmms and firefox have been rebuilt. > > Who knows what have I do to fix the problem? > > Your system is not consistent. There is no _malloc_prefork() > (or _malloc_foofork()) in -stable; it only exists in -current. > You've got -current libraries (at least libpthread) on -stable. > libpthread is installed in /usr/lib in RELENG_6, not /lib. > So if you've downgraded from -current, you'll need to remove > the -current libraries that have different locations in > RELENG_6 (no, I don't think there is an automated way to do > this). > > -- > DE Daniel, I thank You very much for Your comment. I've removed all the -current libraries from my system and now all works fine. Regards, Serguey. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 06:39:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B44616A4E5 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:39:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2471843D5F for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:39:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so377190wxd for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:43 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=YO3hGMGjgtUQv9EtWbIammilyEt+kBIdNOIEkJrYFv7AkRxJAz2LDPpHbjcCi2Bdirw5JTAM/hTX+9H4ip/O12IGMN/CI4bjXvIejxwl7/H8v/T5wZ4hL3OPyIGZ3z/P/vUQ7bDLb4ClANhbasWtkDsigZVM+o6CqldEjOWaFcU= Received: by 10.70.131.20 with SMTP id e20mr1936201wxd; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.49.3 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Aug 2006 23:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 01:39:43 -0500 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Andreas Klemm" In-Reply-To: <20060824053618.GA7211@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <003f01c6c68d$64688e60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <20060824053618.GA7211@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 06:39:48 -0000 On 8/24/06, Andreas Klemm wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:23:00AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: > > The Areca cards I can recommend. Highpoint 1820a is surprisingly good > > Many many years ago I bought a HighPoint HPT366 ATA66 controller. > Thought its a good deal because it was cheap. > Thought, an ATA interface can't be that complicated anymore > so that its safe to buy a cheap product. > > Turned out that I was very wrong with my theorie. > I ran into timeout problems, that couldn't be fixed. > > After days and nights of troubleshooting and testing > I didn't get it to work reliably. > > I replaced it by buying a more expensive Promise controller. > Since then I had zero problems. > > Since that time I lost trust in HighPoint products. > > Good stuff has its price. It must not always be the > most expensive hardware. But going with the cheapest > (and I assume the HighPoint product will again be > in the low price segment) can be troublesome. > As the owner of a HPT2220 and HPT1820A I have nothing but good things to say about it. In fact my experience is the inverse of yours. I've had nothing but problems with my Promise card. To make matters worse Promise doesn't support FreeBSD... No drivers, No docs, Nothing. HighPoint does support FreeBSD by providing their own FreeBSD drivers and HighPoint's code is in FreeBSD. The one bad thing I have to say about HighPoint is that their drivers are locked up in binary blobs. Areca's drivers on the other hand are fully open sourced and they have the fastest SATA hardware in the land thanks to the onboard 600MHz Intel XScale IOP and DDR333 cache. http://tweakers.net/reviews/557/1 Their new hardware (coming soon) will have a 800MHz XScale with DDR2-533 cache. This is from an ARC-1220 with 256MB cache and 7x300GB drives in RAID6: > diskinfo -t da0 da0 512 # sectorsize 1499999764480 # mediasize in bytes (1.4T) 2929687040 # mediasize in sectors 182364 # Cylinders according to firmware. 255 # Heads according to firmware. 63 # Sectors according to firmware. Seek times: Full stroke: 250 iter in 5.022332 sec = 20.089 msec Half stroke: 250 iter in 3.809019 sec = 15.236 msec Quarter stroke: 500 iter in 4.055315 sec = 8.111 msec Short forward: 400 iter in 0.998948 sec = 2.497 msec Short backward: 400 iter in 2.519062 sec = 6.298 msec Seq outer: 2048 iter in 0.187788 sec = 0.092 msec Seq inner: 2048 iter in 0.219632 sec = 0.107 msec Transfer rates: outside: 102400 kbytes in 0.353485 sec = 289687 kbytes/sec middle: 102400 kbytes in 0.372773 sec = 274698 kbytes/sec inside: 102400 kbytes in 0.543272 sec = 188488 kbytes/sec Chad Leigh has an ARC-1130 with 1GB cache and he's getting even better numbers (300~400MB/s) using ZFS + Solaris Express. -- BSD Podcasts @: http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/ http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 07:56:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37A516A4DE; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:56:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D96343D45; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:56:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (inchoate.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.25]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.5/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7O7uNtO008967 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:26:23 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:26:08 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1653106.y8p82APb16"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200608241726.21473.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -3.269 () ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, Nikolas Britton Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:56:26 -0000 --nextPart1653106.y8p82APb16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 24 August 2006 01:16, Nikolas Britton wrote: > Stay away from Adaptec and Promise because they don't support FreeBSD. > I would recommend Areca and/or HighPoint because they do officially > support FreeBSD. 3Ware does support FreeBSD but I don't have > experience with their cards so I can't say anything good or bad about > them. I believe Promise *do* support FreeBSD quite a bit. Certainly Soren's commit messages indicate that. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1653106.y8p82APb16 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBE7Vul5ZPcIHs/zowRAn1RAJ4uDRjhSuUIw0pWUb4N84zbf/TQ4ACfYG+t zJMSoHYnKMlrxGSOaZYuZ5g= =SnPw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1653106.y8p82APb16-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 07:56:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37A516A4DE; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:56:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D96343D45; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:56:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (inchoate.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.25]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.5/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7O7uNtO008967 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:26:23 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:26:08 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1653106.y8p82APb16"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200608241726.21473.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -3.269 () ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, Nikolas Britton Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 07:56:27 -0000 --nextPart1653106.y8p82APb16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 24 August 2006 01:16, Nikolas Britton wrote: > Stay away from Adaptec and Promise because they don't support FreeBSD. > I would recommend Areca and/or HighPoint because they do officially > support FreeBSD. 3Ware does support FreeBSD but I don't have > experience with their cards so I can't say anything good or bad about > them. I believe Promise *do* support FreeBSD quite a bit. Certainly Soren's commit messages indicate that. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1653106.y8p82APb16 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBE7Vul5ZPcIHs/zowRAn1RAJ4uDRjhSuUIw0pWUb4N84zbf/TQ4ACfYG+t zJMSoHYnKMlrxGSOaZYuZ5g= =SnPw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1653106.y8p82APb16-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 08:20:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8277516A4E6; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:20:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (relay0.rambler.ru [81.19.66.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA6A43D7F; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:20:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1BE6165; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:20:06 +0400 (MSD) Received: from edoofus.park.rambler.ru (unknown [81.19.65.108]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8943E6141; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:20:06 +0400 (MSD) Received: (from ru@localhost) by edoofus.park.rambler.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) id k7O8KC59082432; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:20:12 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ru) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:20:12 +0400 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20060824082012.GA81296@rambler-co.ru> References: <5B7BD83A-6316-4C20-903E-B5D66D4F2642@khera.org> <44EB5354.6070007@paladin.bulgarpress.com> <44EB6411.4040406@paladin.bulgarpress.com> <20060823193309.GA77890@rambler-co.ru> <44ECBFE8.7000809@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44ECBFE8.7000809@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-Virus-Scanned: No virus found Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:20:19 -0000 --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 01:51:52PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2006 at 11:07:45PM +0300, Todorov @ Paladin wrote: > >> Also - why portupgrade is not always aware of > >> previously chosen options for a port build? > >> > > It depends. If options are OPTIONS (in the ports sense), they > > are saved and independent of portupgrade. If options are > > makefile options specified in pkgtools.conf, they are only > > taken into accont if the port is (re)build explicitly; they > > are not taken into account if a port is (re)built as a > > dependency of another port. In plain text: if port B has > > options in pkgtools.conf, and port A has B as its dependency, > > and you portinstall/portupgrade A, B will be built (if needs > > be) without pkgtools.conf options. Be careful. >=20 > sysutils/portconf does not have that limitation. If you specify flags usi= ng > that method, they will always be used. >=20 True. The implementation is also smart -- it doesn't spam make(1) environment when not necessary. Thanks! Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE7WE8qRfpzJluFF4RAgi3AJoDdNU4GCi8hjNPQTkgpZeIerwsJACgiKMr UxhzjAm1Jb5JzbNrOq7AWx0= =n8Zi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 09:18:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB9DE16A4DE; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:18:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4145D43D45; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:18:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from ceri by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GGBMS-000HKe-Uw; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:18:53 +0100 Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:18:52 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: stable@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20060824091852.GE66037@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , stable@FreeBSD.org References: <200608232337.k7NNbJT8032059@repoman.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M38YqGLZlgb6RLPS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608232337.k7NNbJT8032059@repoman.freebsd.org> X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Sender: Ceri Davies Cc: Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialcomms chapter.sgml X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:18:55 -0000 --M38YqGLZlgb6RLPS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [ Forwarded from cvs-doc ] On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:37:19PM +0000, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > keramida 2006-08-23 23:37:19 UTC >=20 > FreeBSD doc repository >=20 > Modified files: > en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialcomms chapter.sgml=20 > Log: > Expand the section `Setting a Faster Serial Port Speed', to mention > ways to set the serial console speed without having to rebuild the > boot blocks. Note that for releases before 6.1, though, rebuilding > the boot blocks may be the only option. On a related note, is the keyboard multiplexer now good enough for us to ship a /boot.config containing '-P' on the installation images? Ceri --=20 That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere --M38YqGLZlgb6RLPS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE7W78ocfcwTS3JF8RAnRVAKCbEV/FZjmXBFvEHm4q0P5Gzsh/zQCguYwt h4DmRg00oKrCtAtffXkOK/U= =oU+Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M38YqGLZlgb6RLPS-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 10:12:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7A016A4E2 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:12:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nkalev@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B33043D5F for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:12:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nkalev@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i2so530608nfe for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 03:12:53 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=G6pBwj4TFgYTAfkuVzAcdeBS5En/DBsre4Swvq1/09TGBJ++SBGdYBn1izG8+SnGJOITVOPbHQoapmrPXuenGx+by9i33W11+aynDyJn8XlSZhODCm11umDZQab/FonxB9N9wD1XwdE9Y6ftnDt8mhF8YtYuKpgDxpcDVsg4Gn4= Received: by 10.48.162.15 with SMTP id k15mr3279032nfe; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 03:12:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.59.7 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 03:12:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <136a340a0608240312m3c273eb4o3ce8085ddd8c4b23@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:12:53 +0400 From: "Nikolay Kalev" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: source tree borked for 6.1-stable ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:12:58 -0000 /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c:37:23: opt_ip6fw.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/netinet6/ip6_forward.c:33:23: opt_ip6fw.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/netinet6/ip6_input.c:64:23: opt_ip6fw.h: No such file or directory /usr/src/sys/netinet6/ip6_output.c:64:23: opt_ip6fw.h: No such file or directory options into my kernel with or without IPV6FIREWALL gives errors on the above line or /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/FW1: unknown option "IPV6FIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT" *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 after update from cvsup5.freebsd.org or what ever other cvsup5-11.x.x :-((( i guess someone forgot to put in /usr/src/sys/conf/options IPV6FIREWALL opt_ip6fw.h IPV6FIREWALL_VERBOSE opt_ip6fw.h IPV6FIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=100 opt_ip6fw.h IPV6FIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT opt_ip6fw.h -- Key fingerprint = 9864 E575 E207 FB90 44C8 26A2 0167 E57E 66ED 0F1D From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 10:48:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A24516A4E0 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:48:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@azimut-tour.ru) Received: from cny.innet.yaroslavl.su (cny.innet.yaroslavl.su [217.15.134.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFA443D45 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:48:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@azimut-tour.ru) Received: from tac.innet.yaroslavl.su (tac.innet.yaroslavl.su [217.15.135.68]) by cny.innet.yaroslavl.su (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k7OAmfc12913; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:48:41 +0400 (MSD) Received: from azimutprint.ru (azimutprint.ru [217.15.145.118]) by tac.innet.yaroslavl.su (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7OAmeGl005942; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:48:40 +0400 (MSD) Received: from azimutprint.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by azimutprint.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D1A1B8EA; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:48:39 +0400 (MSD) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (greencomp.azimutprint.ru [192.168.1.2]) by azimutprint.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7D3B80E; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:48:37 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <44ED8403.8000903@azimut-tour.ru> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:48:35 +0400 From: GreenX User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: erich , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <6.2.3.4.0.20060731094908.137f4848@64.7.153.2> <00be01c6b510$03060c30$b100a8c0@erich2003> <001d01c6b54c$06085870$b100a8c0@erich2003> In-Reply-To: <001d01c6b54c$06085870$b100a8c0@erich2003> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: Subject: Re: GIANT in arcmsr(4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:48:44 -0000 Hi, I face to a choice - Areca ARC-1110 vs. 3ware 9550SX-4LP. Whether soon there will be an amendment to the arc driver? BR, GReenX. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 11:53:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA41216A4DE for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:53:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jes@jes-2.demon.nl) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B67A43D45 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:53:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jes@jes-2.demon.nl) Received: from jes-1.demon.nl ([83.160.144.201]:15623 helo=jes-2.demon.nl) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1GGDmS-000Ft1-GO for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:53:52 +0000 Received: from jes by jes-2.demon.nl with local (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1GGDmR-000H5C-Vg; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:53:51 +0200 Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 13:53:51 +0200 From: Jim Segrave To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060824115351.GB44213@jes-2.demon.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Organisation: Demon Netherlands Cc: jes@jes-2.demon.nl Subject: gdb problem with 6.1-RELEASE-p3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jes@jes-2.demon.nl List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:53:53 -0000 I was trying to debug a threaded application on my machine (Sony Vaio laptop, i386 architecture) I'm running 6.1-RELEASE-p3 as downgrade from RELENG_6 (after upgrading 5.4->5.5) When I invoke gdb on a threaded application, I get the following: Script started on Thu Aug 24 13:32:12 2006 jes@jes-2.demon.nl:/home/jes/gnubg% gdb ./gnubg GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"... (gdb) b main Breakpoint 1 at 0x8078a58: file gnubg.c, line 7109. (gdb) r -t Starting program: /usr/home/jes/gnubg/gnubg -t warning: Unable to get location for thread creation breakpoint: generic error Error while reading shared library symbols: PT_LWPINFO: Invalid argument. no thread to satisfy query Stopped due to shared library event (gdb) c Continuing. no thread to satisfy query 0x282381c0 in r_debug_state () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 (gdb) c Continuing. no thread to satisfy query 0x282381c0 in r_debug_state () from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 (gdb) q The program is running. Exit anyway? (y or n) y jes@jes-2.demon.nl:/home/jes/gnubg% exit exit Script done on Thu Aug 24 13:32:41 2006 Anyone have any ideas what is causing this? The version from /usr/ports/devel/gdb6 doesn't do this. -- Jim Segrave jes@jes-2.demon.nl From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 14:34:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F0416A4E0 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:34:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msch@snafu.de) Received: from sour.visp.de (sour.visp.de [84.23.254.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162D643D6A for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:34:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msch@snafu.de) X-Trace: 507c6d73636840736e6166752e64657c38342e3139302e3139312e35377c314747 4748732d303030324f6c2d4f377c31313536343330303638 Received: from sour.visp.de ([10.154.10.19] helo=localhost) by sour.visp.de with esmtpa (Exim 4.63 id 1GGGHs-0002Ol-O7); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:34:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <518C224A-A45F-445B-AA2D-50456CBBF7DF@mac.com> References: <518C224A-A45F-445B-AA2D-50456CBBF7DF@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <0F824B06-C24D-44BA-99AD-D72BED887186@snafu.de> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matthias Schuendehuette Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:34:20 +0200 To: Chuck Swiger X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Junk Pointer Error X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:34:35 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Chuck, Am 23.08.2006 um 21:25 schrieb Chuck Swiger: > Sure your hardware is OK? Try running memtest86 or a hardware > diagnostic from your vendor, and double-check your fans & PSU... Yes, I'm sure! Tried it today on my Laptop - same error! I think it's *very* unlikely, that two machines have exactly the same HW problems... Matthew - -- Ciao/BSD - Matthias Matthias Schuendehuette , Berlin (Germany) PGP-Key at and ID: 0xDDFB0A5F -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) iD8DBQFE7bjwf1BNcN37Cl8RAs8cAJ9PSb9M2hZPnqgxiLOb5fD3LEowcACfcAJv wUMB28fWj92KLQUxB5Gd2k0= =DJYs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 16:22:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CC0416A4E7 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:22:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.239]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AE143D49 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:22:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so520374wxd for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:22:50 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iV9PRUUVA3pbaOjTzr/5vJW6CdGIFVxY2IRsemk4lo75IuYca5MVX9+7+nbdjntyFhNwTiUDBzi4MUa2v28z55w8hd4q2/SSRsyQFyj5EiLYmU0enteYbVWbNWeH7a8F/HP5SSLzVUrNjT0tlscws8VwH0qcH0+7gf3CueHvH4Q= Received: by 10.70.52.2 with SMTP id z2mr2826304wxz; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.49.3 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:22:50 -0500 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Daniel O'Connor" In-Reply-To: <200608241726.21473.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <200608241726.21473.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:22:52 -0000 On 8/24/06, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Thursday 24 August 2006 01:16, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > Stay away from Adaptec and Promise because they don't support FreeBSD. > > I would recommend Areca and/or HighPoint because they do officially > > support FreeBSD. 3Ware does support FreeBSD but I don't have > > experience with their cards so I can't say anything good or bad about > > them. > > I believe Promise *do* support FreeBSD quite a bit. > Maybe as an after thought. I also don't see any link on their site for FreeBSD support, lets check google: http://www.google.com/search?&q=site%3Awww.promise.com+FreeBSD http://www.google.com/search?&q=site%3Ahighpoint-tech.com+FreeBSD So 7 Links Vs. 90 Links. Also if you click on that first link google gives you, about the up coming RAID6 SuperTrak EX4350 and EX12350 with support for FreeBSD etc.. Those card are clones of Areca's ARC-1210 and ARC-1230 cards... Striped down clones at that, they only have a 500MHz XScale IOP333... Areca is already moving from the 600MHz XScale IOP333 to the 800MHz XScale IOP341 with DDR2-533 support... Hell I bet they're just going to patch arcmsr(4) and call it there own. Areca's Erich Chen put a lot of work into arcmsr(4). There wouldn't be an arcmsr(4) in FreeBSD if it wasn't for Areca commitment to support FreeBSD. Now we have Promise trying to claim they support FreeBSD by patching a few lines of code from another company. Butch of BS is what that is. -- BSD Podcasts @: http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/ http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 16:24:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A352C16A4E0 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:24:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.238]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57A143D70 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:24:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so520829wxd for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:24:29 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=iV9PRUUVA3pbaOjTzr/5vJW6CdGIFVxY2IRsemk4lo75IuYca5MVX9+7+nbdjntyFhNwTiUDBzi4MUa2v28z55w8hd4q2/SSRsyQFyj5EiLYmU0enteYbVWbNWeH7a8F/HP5SSLzVUrNjT0tlscws8VwH0qcH0+7gf3CueHvH4Q= Received: by 10.70.52.2 with SMTP id z2mr2826304wxz; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.49.3 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 09:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:22:50 -0500 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Daniel O'Connor" In-Reply-To: <200608241726.21473.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <200608241726.21473.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:24:39 -0000 On 8/24/06, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Thursday 24 August 2006 01:16, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > Stay away from Adaptec and Promise because they don't support FreeBSD. > > I would recommend Areca and/or HighPoint because they do officially > > support FreeBSD. 3Ware does support FreeBSD but I don't have > > experience with their cards so I can't say anything good or bad about > > them. > > I believe Promise *do* support FreeBSD quite a bit. > Maybe as an after thought. I also don't see any link on their site for FreeBSD support, lets check google: http://www.google.com/search?&q=site%3Awww.promise.com+FreeBSD http://www.google.com/search?&q=site%3Ahighpoint-tech.com+FreeBSD So 7 Links Vs. 90 Links. Also if you click on that first link google gives you, about the up coming RAID6 SuperTrak EX4350 and EX12350 with support for FreeBSD etc.. Those card are clones of Areca's ARC-1210 and ARC-1230 cards... Striped down clones at that, they only have a 500MHz XScale IOP333... Areca is already moving from the 600MHz XScale IOP333 to the 800MHz XScale IOP341 with DDR2-533 support... Hell I bet they're just going to patch arcmsr(4) and call it there own. Areca's Erich Chen put a lot of work into arcmsr(4). There wouldn't be an arcmsr(4) in FreeBSD if it wasn't for Areca commitment to support FreeBSD. Now we have Promise trying to claim they support FreeBSD by patching a few lines of code from another company. Butch of BS is what that is. -- BSD Podcasts @: http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/ http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 17:06:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34B716A4E6; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from darren.pilgrim@bitfreak.org) Received: from mail.twinthornes.com (mail.twinthornes.com [65.75.198.147]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1F143D45; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:06:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from darren.pilgrim@bitfreak.org) Received: from smiley (c-67-171-135-169.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.171.135.169]) by mail.twinthornes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57AD147D; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:06:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.1.405 [268.11.6/427]); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:07:12 -0700 Message-ID: <44EDDCC0.703@bitfreak.org> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:07:12 -0700 From: Darren Pilgrim User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Klemm References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <003f01c6c68d$64688e60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <20060824053618.GA7211@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> In-Reply-To: <20060824053618.GA7211@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:06:21 -0000 Andreas Klemm wrote: > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 09:23:00AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote: >> The Areca cards I can recommend. Highpoint 1820a is surprisingly good > > Many many years ago I bought a HighPoint HPT366 ATA66 controller. > Thought its a good deal because it was cheap. > Thought, an ATA interface can't be that complicated anymore > so that its safe to buy a cheap product. > > Turned out that I was very wrong with my theorie. > I ran into timeout problems, that couldn't be fixed. > > After days and nights of troubleshooting and testing > I didn't get it to work reliably. > > I replaced it by buying a more expensive Promise controller. > Since then I had zero problems. > > Since that time I lost trust in HighPoint products. The 366 was an exception, mostly. It was a borked piece of hardware in a "new generation" of ATA controllers at a time when IIRC FreeBSD was on the leading edge of major overhaul of ATA support. Modern HighPoint controllers are decent for the price. I wouldn't put one in a server, though. My servers use 3ware and Dell cards. -- Darren Pilgrim From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 18:09:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BA516A4DA for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:09:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from laurent.bar@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.189]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE97A43D45 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:09:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from laurent.bar@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id n29so691875nfc for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:09:35 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=EaU/0E2pnCHjsrlLHhTMH9k/CfU3qNfrZprzCPcV4YCzqTLi2WDSXIqjgg6eLS5QY746e8BSCrh2cm0sduixcLzxN3dsf7c6kBG5JXHee9wCKGXRDwxCNyLOdqfdienAZjLbK1mW3KIffte3uNYC/PtmTCkE7Q3QB6fDyr0Io8Q= Received: by 10.49.19.18 with SMTP id w18mr4077849nfi; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:09:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.220.6 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:09:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:09:35 +0200 From: "Laurent C" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: [AMD64-SMP] I can't get my cpus working at 100% X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:09:37 -0000 Hello all, I can't get my athlon x2 processor working at 100% on cpu-intensive apps. I've made some tests with "john --test" and "transcode", wich are both multithreaded apps. For example if I launch transcode it takes between 50% and 55% cpu (on top), and if I launch a second transcode session on another file, the total cpu used on top is 100%, without lower the speed of the first transcode session. The same behavior occurs with john. A single "john --test" give me some speed results, and the same command with a transcode or second "john --test" give me the same speed results but now with 100% cpu used. I made a "portupgrade -auf" just after building and installing my SMP kernel and World, to be sure all is up-to-date. So it's seems it's not a "top" output problem, but a real underuse of the computing power. %uname -a FreeBSD wks02.chez.oim 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #0: Thu Aug 17 18:47:31 CEST 2006 laurent@wks02.chez.oim:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WKS02_SMP amd64 Does anyone could explain me what's happening with my system ? -- Laurent C. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 18:19:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D455016A4E7; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:19:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8238343D78; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:19:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7OIJYKF079379; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:19:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id k7OIJVgT079378; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:19:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:19:31 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Nikolas Britton Message-ID: <20060824181931.GA79261@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <003f01c6c68d$64688e60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <44EC27C7.8060906@withagen.nl> <20060823120146.GA21578@rancor.immure.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:19:41 -0000 On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:13:37AM -0500, Nikolas Britton wrote: > I agree. PCIe 8x is a faster bus and it's typically connected directly > to the MCH (north bridge) unlike PCI-X which is stuck on the ICH > (south bridge). This would be for a Northbridge-based system (ie. Intel). For AMD-based motherboards, both PCI-X and PCI-e controlers usually sit the same distance away the CPU's - one hop on the HyperTransport link. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 18:27:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC7116A4DE; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:27:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E72F43D5A; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:27:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7OIRJeF079551; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:27:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id k7OIRJWP079550; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:27:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 11:27:19 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Nikolas Britton Message-ID: <20060824182719.GB79261@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <003f01c6c68d$64688e60$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <20060824053618.GA7211@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:27:21 -0000 On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:39:43AM -0500, Nikolas Britton wrote: > had nothing but problems with my Promise card. To make matters worse > Promise doesn't support FreeBSD... No drivers, No docs, Nothing. eh??? You don't follow FreeBSD very carefully. Promise sends full docs to sos@freebsd.org who writes the driver. I'd much rather have a talented driver writer who knows FreeBSD coding style create the driver from vendor docs, than trusting the intern silicon guy the forced to write code make one. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 19:00:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEF0416A4DD for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:00:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.192.81]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C2143D4C for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:00:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from gimpy (c-24-118-173-219.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[24.118.173.219]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with ESMTP id <20060824190034m110030bjqe>; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:00:38 +0000 From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:00:29 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608241400.29903.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: Laurent C Subject: Re: [AMD64-SMP] I can't get my cpus working at 100% X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:00:39 -0000 On Thursday 24 August 2006 13:09, Laurent C wrote: > Hello all, > > I can't get my athlon x2 processor working at 100% on cpu-intensive > apps. I've made some tests with "john --test" and "transcode", wich > are both multithreaded apps. > > For example if I launch transcode it takes between 50% and 55% cpu > (on top), and if I launch > a second transcode session on another file, the total cpu used on > top is 100%, without lower the speed > of the first transcode session. > > The same behavior occurs with john. A single "john --test" give me > some speed results, and the same > command with a transcode or second "john --test" give me the same > speed results but now with 100% > cpu used. > > I made a "portupgrade -auf" just after building and installing my > SMP kernel and World, to be sure all is up-to-date. > > So it's seems it's not a "top" output problem, but a real underuse > of the computing power. > > %uname -a > FreeBSD wks02.chez.oim 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #0: Thu Aug 17 > 18:47:31 CEST 2006 > laurent@wks02.chez.oim:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WKS02_SMP amd64 > > Does anyone could explain me what's happening with my system ? An application that is not written to take advantage of a multi-cpu system is unable to max out more than one CPU at a time. top isn't really SMP 'aware' so in a dual CPU system something that is using 50% of the CPU is in reality maxing one CPU. This is a bit over-simplified because the process will bounce between the two CPUs but it will never execute on more than one at a time. -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 19:06:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B094A16A4DF for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:06:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7449D43D67 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:06:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5DD1A4DCF; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:06:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 02688511BD; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:06:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:06:52 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Laurent C Message-ID: <20060824190651.GA49364@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [AMD64-SMP] I can't get my cpus working at 100% X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:06:57 -0000 --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 08:09:35PM +0200, Laurent C wrote: > Hello all, >=20 > I can't get my athlon x2 processor working at 100% on cpu-intensive apps. > I've made some tests with "john --test" and "transcode", wich are both > multithreaded apps. >=20 > For example if I launch transcode it takes between 50% and 55% cpu (on to= p), > and if I launch > a second transcode session on another file, the total cpu used on top is > 100%, without lower the speed > of the first transcode session. >=20 > The same behavior occurs with john. A single "john --test" give me some > speed results, and the same > command with a transcode or second "john --test" give me the same speed > results but now with 100% > cpu used. >=20 > I made a "portupgrade -auf" just after building and installing my SMP ker= nel > and World, to be sure all is up-to-date. >=20 > So it's seems it's not a "top" output problem, but a real underuse of the > computing power. >=20 > %uname -a > FreeBSD wks02.chez.oim 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #0: Thu Aug 17 18:47= :31 > CEST 2006 laurent@wks02.chez.oim:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/WKS02_SMP amd64 >=20 > Does anyone could explain me what's happening with my system ? How do you know the applications are running with two threads? Presumably you need to specify the amount of parallelism. Kris --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE7fjLWry0BWjoQKURAg5KAJ0WMnqPRU8ZmeRzukkqjS2rvGGvQgCg0wTP RJ5nDy5a4P30yPC0I/6Sbq8= =QeNu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5vNYLRcllDrimb99-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 19:09:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E7316A4DA for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:09:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066C743D73 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:09:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE871A4DD0; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:09:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C533B511BD; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:09:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:09:26 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Nikolay Kalev Message-ID: <20060824190926.GB49364@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <136a340a0608240312m3c273eb4o3ce8085ddd8c4b23@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <136a340a0608240312m3c273eb4o3ce8085ddd8c4b23@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: source tree borked for 6.1-stable ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:09:35 -0000 --OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 02:12:53PM +0400, Nikolay Kalev wrote: > /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c:37:23: opt_ip6fw.h: No such file or directo= ry > /usr/src/sys/netinet6/ip6_forward.c:33:23: opt_ip6fw.h: No such file > or directory > /usr/src/sys/netinet6/ip6_input.c:64:23: opt_ip6fw.h: No such file or=20 > directory > /usr/src/sys/netinet6/ip6_output.c:64:23: opt_ip6fw.h: No such file or=20 > directory >=20 > options into my kernel with or without IPV6FIREWALL gives errors on > the above line or >=20 > /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/FW1: unknown option "IPV6FIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEP= T" > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > after update from cvsup5.freebsd.org or what ever other cvsup5-11.x.x > :-((( > i guess someone forgot to put in > /usr/src/sys/conf/options >=20 > IPV6FIREWALL opt_ip6fw.h > IPV6FIREWALL_VERBOSE opt_ip6fw.h > IPV6FIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=3D100 opt_ip6fw.h > IPV6FIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT opt_ip6fw.h Perhaps someone accidentally updated their source to current? Kris --OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE7flmWry0BWjoQKURAkIoAKCRJL2Tc2Wwj/vwpNyHT4iI5jy2HACgzfuQ Vc1v5IkuFwGwS/JCB0kyzkM= =fLrA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 19:18:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296F016A4DA for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:18:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imb@protected-networks.net) Received: from aaron.protected-networks.net (aaron.protected-networks.net [202.12.127.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9386143D53 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:18:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imb@protected-networks.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aaron.protected-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68696C610; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:18:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from aaron.protected-networks.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aaron.protected-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6ACC5CF; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:18:05 -0400 (EDT) Authentication-Results: aaron.protected-networks.net from=imb@protected-networks.net; domainkey=pass Received: from aaron.protected-networks.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aaron.protected-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FF0C4F7; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:18:05 -0400 (EDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=200509; d=protected-networks.net; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:X-Enigmail-Version:OpenPGP:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Ue5QyV6FeOkCuBb86/uveMrBBUQDD5gkP+jH1TDQZu8lx5RiUlaeIw5VsO2pteyo4NQo2EP/04HPBWLqareVyw8cMxCjfLDSI0IDSG5F20+fS/WO9PRv0yGR24icyQdN; Received: from [63.118.137.105] (unknown [63.118.137.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Iain Michael Butler", Issuer "Protected Networks Certificate Authority" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: imb@protected-networks.net) by aaron.protected-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625BEC390; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:18:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <44EDFB5F.8040506@protected-networks.net> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:17:51 -0400 From: Michael Butler User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <136a340a0608240312m3c273eb4o3ce8085ddd8c4b23@mail.gmail.com> <20060824190926.GB49364@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060824190926.GB49364@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.1.0 OpenPGP: id=0442D492 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Nikolay Kalev , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: source tree borked for 6.1-stable ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:18:12 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 02:12:53PM +0400, Nikolay Kalev wrote: >> /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c:37:23: opt_ip6fw.h: No such file or directory >> /usr/src/sys/netinet6/ip6_forward.c:33:23: opt_ip6fw.h: No such file >> or directory [ .. ] > Perhaps someone accidentally updated their source to current? Nope .. a 'cd /usr/src; make kernel' prompts this behaviour on today's - -stable sources :-( Michael -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) iD8DBQFE7ftfQv9rrgRC1JIRAgqtAJ9zVbXhDbM42uvP5Bcp9IoUX1wIcwCgrZBF 9ey1WssVxPA4YxsZe1Y9W5E= =KLA1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 19:28:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C896316A4DA for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:28:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5692F43D67 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:28:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4E11A4DCC; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:28:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B8A005164F; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:28:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:28:22 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Michael Butler Message-ID: <20060824192822.GA49845@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <136a340a0608240312m3c273eb4o3ce8085ddd8c4b23@mail.gmail.com> <20060824190926.GB49364@xor.obsecurity.org> <44EDFB5F.8040506@protected-networks.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44EDFB5F.8040506@protected-networks.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Nikolay Kalev , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: source tree borked for 6.1-stable ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:28:33 -0000 --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:17:51PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 02:12:53PM +0400, Nikolay Kalev wrote: > >> /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c:37:23: opt_ip6fw.h: No such file or dire= ctory > >> /usr/src/sys/netinet6/ip6_forward.c:33:23: opt_ip6fw.h: No such file > >> or directory >=20 > [ .. ] >=20 > > Perhaps someone accidentally updated their source to current? >=20 >=20 > Nope .. a 'cd /usr/src; make kernel' prompts this behaviour on today's > -stable sources :-( OK, guess it was a bad merge. Try again later. Kris --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE7f3WWry0BWjoQKURAuGUAJ41K23hjjq65xFKravF8uXErrcPZgCglX1v 3JPQXWDLAsuJGAb6FdW8CwU= =kaR6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 19:28:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5BE16A50D for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:28:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (relay0.rambler.ru [81.19.66.187]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E23C643D8C for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:28:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@rambler-co.ru) Received: from relay0.rambler.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DDE460C8; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:28:39 +0400 (MSD) Received: from edoofus.park.rambler.ru (unknown [81.19.65.108]) by relay0.rambler.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D871601E; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:28:39 +0400 (MSD) Received: (from ru@localhost) by edoofus.park.rambler.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) id k7OJSnvu089476; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:28:49 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from ru) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:28:49 +0400 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Michael Butler Message-ID: <20060824192849.GA89454@rambler-co.ru> References: <136a340a0608240312m3c273eb4o3ce8085ddd8c4b23@mail.gmail.com> <20060824190926.GB49364@xor.obsecurity.org> <44EDFB5F.8040506@protected-networks.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+QahgC5+KEYLbs62" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44EDFB5F.8040506@protected-networks.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 X-Virus-Scanned: No virus found Cc: Nikolay Kalev , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: source tree borked for 6.1-stable ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:28:50 -0000 --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:17:51PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 02:12:53PM +0400, Nikolay Kalev wrote: > >> /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_fw2.c:37:23: opt_ip6fw.h: No such file or dire= ctory > >> /usr/src/sys/netinet6/ip6_forward.c:33:23: opt_ip6fw.h: No such file > >> or directory >=20 > [ .. ] >=20 > > Perhaps someone accidentally updated their source to current? >=20 >=20 > Nope .. a 'cd /usr/src; make kernel' prompts this behaviour on today's > - -stable sources :-( >=20 This has been fixed for several hours now, please re-cvsup. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE7f3xqRfpzJluFF4RAnLpAJ9yJroOCJZ7hmL4x+JIAjuoKAZjvQCfQ39A PCniLDgxqrFnV+S2mvNII6w= =Z0U6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+QahgC5+KEYLbs62-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 19:33:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D1A16A4DF for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:33:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E52D43D55 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:33:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7OJXKe3069072; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:33:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: Ceri Davies Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:20:47 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200608232337.k7NNbJT8032059@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060824091852.GE66037@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20060824091852.GE66037@submonkey.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608241520.47903.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:33:22 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.3/1726/Thu Aug 24 14:45:50 2006 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialcomms chapter.sgml X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:33:25 -0000 On Thursday 24 August 2006 05:18, Ceri Davies wrote: > [ Forwarded from cvs-doc ] > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:37:19PM +0000, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > keramida 2006-08-23 23:37:19 UTC > > > > FreeBSD doc repository > > > > Modified files: > > en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialcomms chapter.sgml > > Log: > > Expand the section `Setting a Faster Serial Port Speed', to mention > > ways to set the serial console speed without having to rebuild the > > boot blocks. Note that for releases before 6.1, though, rebuilding > > the boot blocks may be the only option. > > On a related note, is the keyboard multiplexer now good enough for us to > ship a /boot.config containing '-P' on the installation images? That's unrelated. -P only does a very simple check to see if a keyboard is present. Many systems with only USB keyboards would fail the check and end up sending their output to the serial console. We could use -D though, that would let the user break into the loader and adjust console (or use boot -h) to force sysinstall to use the serial console. -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 19:42:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D5CD16A4DE; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:42:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E2443D73; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:42:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from ceri by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1GGL5o-000L4h-P6; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:42:20 +0100 Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 20:42:20 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: John Baldwin Message-ID: <20060824194220.GA59229@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , John Baldwin , stable@freebsd.org References: <200608232337.k7NNbJT8032059@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060824091852.GE66037@submonkey.net> <200608241520.47903.jhb@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200608241520.47903.jhb@freebsd.org> X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Sender: Ceri Davies Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialcomms chapter.sgml X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 19:42:25 -0000 --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:20:47PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Thursday 24 August 2006 05:18, Ceri Davies wrote: > > [ Forwarded from cvs-doc ] > >=20 > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:37:19PM +0000, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > > keramida 2006-08-23 23:37:19 UTC > > >=20 > > > FreeBSD doc repository > > >=20 > > > Modified files: > > > en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialcomms chapter.sgml=20 > > > Log: > > > Expand the section `Setting a Faster Serial Port Speed', to mention > > > ways to set the serial console speed without having to rebuild the > > > boot blocks. Note that for releases before 6.1, though, rebuilding > > > the boot blocks may be the only option. > >=20 > > On a related note, is the keyboard multiplexer now good enough for us to > > ship a /boot.config containing '-P' on the installation images? >=20 > That's unrelated. -P only does a very simple check to see if a keyboard = is=20 > present. Many systems with only USB keyboards would fail the check and e= nd=20 > up sending their output to the serial console. OK, I had thought that kdbmux would help here. Never mind. > We could use -D though, that=20 > would let the user break into the loader and adjust console (or use boot = -h)=20 > to force sysinstall to use the serial console. That smells new, or at least I have never noticed it before! It would help me quiet some people who have complained about having to build custom images to allow a serial installation by the sound of it, though. Ceri --=20 That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE7gEcocfcwTS3JF8RAmTPAKCtyimYryo/1Vmq2GBEIL6FjTxlRgCgyg/G Z+7kYI83mw72nv0aM50O+E4= =EzJn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 21:10:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988B116A4DA for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:10:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2CB43D4C for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:10:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cptsalek@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so602807wxd for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:10:22 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=XJ6c+c7xlZu/ddN03CidBwABbqcn/3pGRNApUd3WQNXOnO4tF+wXzMkFrKAJ+qDdSW0mQFAhC6PdxJZ0tLKLTOviIOB6o8DxzxSvg4Abd+D6wg4zlebrM8ufWT3yaE4VHmhvRW6CYnJS/yt20VUN72WVqC1iaNhsKKioG1kR8bQ= Received: by 10.70.14.20 with SMTP id 20mr3208487wxn; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.24.6 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:10:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <14989d6e0608241410n2b8a5fdwe98a927dea91be40@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:10:22 +0200 From: "Christian Walther" To: "Kris Kennaway" In-Reply-To: <20060824190651.GA49364@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060824190651.GA49364@xor.obsecurity.org> Cc: Laurent C , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [AMD64-SMP] I can't get my cpus working at 100% X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 21:10:32 -0000 Hi there, On 24/08/06, Kris Kennaway wrote: [...] > > How do you know the applications are running with two threads? > Presumably you need to specify the amount of parallelism. > > Kris > To make matters worse you can't even tell if an application running with several threads uses more then one CPU. Originally, threading was implemented with single CPU systems in mind, especially in regard to shares memory and things like this. A nice example of a program being able to do threading, but one CPU (core) only is python. So you don't only want to know how many threads an application is working with, but on what cores they are processed. You might want to man ps for a list of possible option, I don't have a SMP system at hand, but i think ps -aHl might be suitable. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 22:13:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4457416A4E1 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:13:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851E943D46 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:13:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from zion.baldwin.cx (zion.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7OMDj6j070118; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:13:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: Ceri Davies Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:19:10 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200608232337.k7NNbJT8032059@repoman.freebsd.org> <200608241520.47903.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060824194220.GA59229@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20060824194220.GA59229@submonkey.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200608241719.10921.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.1]); Thu, 24 Aug 2006 18:13:45 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.3/1726/Thu Aug 24 14:45:50 2006 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialcomms chapter.sgml X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 22:13:49 -0000 On Thursday 24 August 2006 15:42, Ceri Davies wrote: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 03:20:47PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Thursday 24 August 2006 05:18, Ceri Davies wrote: > > > [ Forwarded from cvs-doc ] > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:37:19PM +0000, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > > > keramida 2006-08-23 23:37:19 UTC > > > > > > > > FreeBSD doc repository > > > > > > > > Modified files: > > > > en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialcomms chapter.sgml > > > > Log: > > > > Expand the section `Setting a Faster Serial Port Speed', to mention > > > > ways to set the serial console speed without having to rebuild the > > > > boot blocks. Note that for releases before 6.1, though, rebuilding > > > > the boot blocks may be the only option. > > > > > > On a related note, is the keyboard multiplexer now good enough for us to > > > ship a /boot.config containing '-P' on the installation images? > > > > That's unrelated. -P only does a very simple check to see if a keyboard is > > present. Many systems with only USB keyboards would fail the check and end > > up sending their output to the serial console. > > OK, I had thought that kdbmux would help here. Never mind. > > > We could use -D though, that > > would let the user break into the loader and adjust console (or use boot -h) > > to force sysinstall to use the serial console. > > That smells new, or at least I have never noticed it before! It would > help me quiet some people who have complained about having to build > custom images to allow a serial installation by the sound of it, though. It's old, kernel and boot2 have supported it for a long time, but /boot/loader has only properly handled -D for the past year or so now. -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 24 23:28:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC4C316A4DA for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:28:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fcash@ocis.net) Received: from smtp.sd73.bc.ca (mailtest.sd73.bc.ca [142.24.13.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464AB43D46 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:28:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fcash@ocis.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.sd73.bc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF9018CCD5 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:36:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at sd73.bc.ca Received: from smtp.sd73.bc.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.sd73.bc.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 39C8xYCa2uO2 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:36:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from webmail.sd73.bc.ca (unknown [10.10.10.17]) by smtp.sd73.bc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5E4D18CC87 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:36:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from webmail.sd73.bc.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by webmail.sd73.bc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B469000464 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:28:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 24.71.118.34 (SquirrelMail authenticated user fcash) by webmail.sd73.bc.ca with HTTP; Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:28:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <63177.24.71.118.34.1156462082.squirrel@webmail.sd73.bc.ca> In-Reply-To: <14989d6e0608241410n2b8a5fdwe98a927dea91be40@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060824190651.GA49364@xor.obsecurity.org> <14989d6e0608241410n2b8a5fdwe98a927dea91be40@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:28:02 -0700 (PDT) From: "Freddie Cash" To: stable@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: [AMD64-SMP] I can't get my cpus working at 100% X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fcash@ocis.net List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 23:28:04 -0000 On Thu, August 24, 2006 2:10 pm, Christian Walther wrote: > On 24/08/06, Kris Kennaway wrote: > [...] >> How do you know the applications are running with two threads? >> Presumably you need to specify the amount of parallelism. > To make matters worse you can't even tell if an application running > with several threads uses more then one CPU. Originally, threading was > implemented with single CPU systems in mind, especially in regard to > shares memory and things like this. A nice example of a program being > able to do threading, but one CPU (core) only is python. > So you don't only want to know how many threads an application is > working with, but on what cores they are processed. You might want to > man ps for a list of possible option, I don't have a SMP system at > hand, but i think ps -aHl might be suitable. Use 'H' in top to switch to thread-view mode, where the individual threads for each running process are shown. Then look in the 'C' column to see which CPU the threads are running on. ---- Freddie Cash fcash@ocis.net From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 25 00:03:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B3E16A4DE; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:03:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E445D43D4C; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:03:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (inchoate.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.25]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.5/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7P03Xlq048715 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:33:34 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: "Nikolas Britton" Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:33:31 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <200608241726.21473.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2238117.IQJOj4Ziu8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200608250933.33075.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -3.277 () ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:03:43 -0000 --nextPart2238117.IQJOj4Ziu8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 25 August 2006 01:52, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > I believe Promise *do* support FreeBSD quite a bit. > > Maybe as an after thought. I also don't see any link on their site for > FreeBSD support, lets check google: cvs log ata-chipset.c.. =2D--------------------------- revision 1.21 date: 2003/05/01 06:20:50; author: sos; state: Exp; lines: +144 -7 I'm pleased to announce that Promise is now supporting the FreeBSD project by providing documentation (under NDA) and hardware for testing. This commit is the first result of the cooperation, and adds support for several of their new controllers that we didn't support before (and probably newer would have without this arrangement). Add support for the Promise SATA150 TX2/TX4 and the Promise TX4000 controllers. This also adds support for various motherboard fitted Promise SATA/ATA chips. Note that this code uses memory mapped registers to minimize overhead. I belive FreeBSD has made another first in the Open Source world by being able to release support for this :) =2D--------------------------- I don't ever download drivers from a companies website for FreeBSD so I=20 couldn't care less if they're mentioned on it :) > http://www.google.com/search?&q=3Dsite%3Awww.promise.com+FreeBSD > > http://www.google.com/search?&q=3Dsite%3Ahighpoint-tech.com+FreeBSD > > So 7 Links Vs. 90 Links. Also if you click on that first link google > gives you, about the up coming RAID6 SuperTrak EX4350 and EX12350 with > support for FreeBSD etc.. Those card are clones of Areca's ARC-1210 > and ARC-1230 cards... Striped down clones at that, they only have a > 500MHz XScale IOP333... Areca is already moving from the 600MHz XScale > IOP333 to the 800MHz XScale IOP341 with DDR2-533 support... Hell I bet > they're just going to patch arcmsr(4) and call it there own. Areca's > Erich Chen put a lot of work into arcmsr(4). There wouldn't be an > arcmsr(4) in FreeBSD if it wasn't for Areca commitment to support > FreeBSD. Now we have Promise trying to claim they support FreeBSD by > patching a few lines of code from another company. Butch of BS is what > that is. Erm, I think "paranoid conspiracy theory" covers this. Just because they use the same chip doesn't mean the driver will magically= =20 work.. The CPU on the RAID card runs a program and that program is what=20 defines the interface with the OS. ISTR 3ware cards have XScale's on them too.. Perhaps Areca cloned them!=20 Promise cards have been supported for much longer than Areca (longer than=20 Areca has actually existed as a company?) and it is my understanding they=20 regularly supply Soren with documentation and hardware. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart2238117.IQJOj4Ziu8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBE7j5V5ZPcIHs/zowRAgJMAKChCgHOZ2NiLlWR/lbvkn3u8zl8SQCfeQ03 yoqBGk1+lEs6NwHi7RgBxrY= =SCpo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2238117.IQJOj4Ziu8-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 25 00:03:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1B3E16A4DE; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:03:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E445D43D4C; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:03:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (inchoate.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.25]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.13.5/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k7P03Xlq048715 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:33:34 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: "Nikolas Britton" Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:33:31 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.3 References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <200608241726.21473.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2238117.IQJOj4Ziu8"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200608250933.33075.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -3.277 () ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.56 on 203.31.81.10 Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:03:43 -0000 --nextPart2238117.IQJOj4Ziu8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 25 August 2006 01:52, Nikolas Britton wrote: > > I believe Promise *do* support FreeBSD quite a bit. > > Maybe as an after thought. I also don't see any link on their site for > FreeBSD support, lets check google: cvs log ata-chipset.c.. =2D--------------------------- revision 1.21 date: 2003/05/01 06:20:50; author: sos; state: Exp; lines: +144 -7 I'm pleased to announce that Promise is now supporting the FreeBSD project by providing documentation (under NDA) and hardware for testing. This commit is the first result of the cooperation, and adds support for several of their new controllers that we didn't support before (and probably newer would have without this arrangement). Add support for the Promise SATA150 TX2/TX4 and the Promise TX4000 controllers. This also adds support for various motherboard fitted Promise SATA/ATA chips. Note that this code uses memory mapped registers to minimize overhead. I belive FreeBSD has made another first in the Open Source world by being able to release support for this :) =2D--------------------------- I don't ever download drivers from a companies website for FreeBSD so I=20 couldn't care less if they're mentioned on it :) > http://www.google.com/search?&q=3Dsite%3Awww.promise.com+FreeBSD > > http://www.google.com/search?&q=3Dsite%3Ahighpoint-tech.com+FreeBSD > > So 7 Links Vs. 90 Links. Also if you click on that first link google > gives you, about the up coming RAID6 SuperTrak EX4350 and EX12350 with > support for FreeBSD etc.. Those card are clones of Areca's ARC-1210 > and ARC-1230 cards... Striped down clones at that, they only have a > 500MHz XScale IOP333... Areca is already moving from the 600MHz XScale > IOP333 to the 800MHz XScale IOP341 with DDR2-533 support... Hell I bet > they're just going to patch arcmsr(4) and call it there own. Areca's > Erich Chen put a lot of work into arcmsr(4). There wouldn't be an > arcmsr(4) in FreeBSD if it wasn't for Areca commitment to support > FreeBSD. Now we have Promise trying to claim they support FreeBSD by > patching a few lines of code from another company. Butch of BS is what > that is. Erm, I think "paranoid conspiracy theory" covers this. Just because they use the same chip doesn't mean the driver will magically= =20 work.. The CPU on the RAID card runs a program and that program is what=20 defines the interface with the OS. ISTR 3ware cards have XScale's on them too.. Perhaps Areca cloned them!=20 Promise cards have been supported for much longer than Areca (longer than=20 Areca has actually existed as a company?) and it is my understanding they=20 regularly supply Soren with documentation and hardware. =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart2238117.IQJOj4Ziu8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBE7j5V5ZPcIHs/zowRAgJMAKChCgHOZ2NiLlWR/lbvkn3u8zl8SQCfeQ03 yoqBGk1+lEs6NwHi7RgBxrY= =SCpo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2238117.IQJOj4Ziu8-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 25 01:49:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB1216A4E1; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:49:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from linda-4.paradise.net.nz (bm-4a.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C7C43D53; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:49:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from smtp-1.paradise.net.nz (tclsnelb1-src-1.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.172]) by linda-4.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0J4J005AQ6DSUS@linda-4.paradise.net.nz>; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:49:06 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-28-131.dsl.clear.net.nz [218.101.28.131]) by smtp-1.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09629166C694; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:49:03 +1200 (NZST) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:49:02 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood In-reply-to: <200608250933.33075.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Daniel O'Connor Message-id: <44EE570E.4090408@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060704) References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <200608241726.21473.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200608250933.33075.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Nikolas Britton Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:49:16 -0000 Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Friday 25 August 2006 01:52, Nikolas Britton wrote: >>> I believe Promise *do* support FreeBSD quite a bit. >> Maybe as an after thought. I also don't see any link on their site for >> FreeBSD support, lets check google: > > > cvs log ata-chipset.c.. > ---------------------------- > revision 1.21 > date: 2003/05/01 06:20:50; author: sos; state: Exp; lines: +144 -7 > I'm pleased to announce that Promise is now supporting the FreeBSD > project by providing documentation (under NDA) and hardware for > testing. This commit is the first result of the cooperation, and > adds support for several of their new controllers that we didn't > support before (and probably newer would have without this arrangement). > > Add support for the Promise SATA150 TX2/TX4 and the Promise TX4000 > controllers. This also adds support for various motherboard fitted > Promise SATA/ATA chips. > Note that this code uses memory mapped registers to minimize overhead. > I belive FreeBSD has made another first in the Open Source world > by being able to release support for this :) > ---------------------------- > While this is true, Promise support seems somewhat problematic for the 4 port cards - I have a TX4000 which FreeBSD (4,5,6,7) consistently see no disks attached to - ever, and a SX4060 that gives ATA semaphore timeouts and 'danger Will Robinson' no matter what disks are attached to it... so neither of these are any use to me for FreeBSD, unfortunately (I gave up and installed Gentoo on the box with the TX4000). By comparison, I have a 3ware 7506 which works perfectly. Admittedly, this is all pretty old HW, but I believe there are still similar issues with *some* newer Promise SATA cards.... Cheers Mark From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 25 01:49:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB1216A4E1; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:49:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from linda-4.paradise.net.nz (bm-4a.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45C7C43D53; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:49:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markir@paradise.net.nz) Received: from smtp-1.paradise.net.nz (tclsnelb1-src-1.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.172]) by linda-4.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0J4J005AQ6DSUS@linda-4.paradise.net.nz>; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:49:06 +1200 (NZST) Received: from [192.168.1.11] (218-101-28-131.dsl.clear.net.nz [218.101.28.131]) by smtp-1.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09629166C694; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:49:03 +1200 (NZST) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:49:02 +1200 From: Mark Kirkwood In-reply-to: <200608250933.33075.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Daniel O'Connor Message-id: <44EE570E.4090408@paradise.net.nz> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060704) References: <44EC0B9B.5020705@withagen.nl> <200608241726.21473.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <200608250933.33075.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Nikolas Britton Subject: Re: suggestions for SATA RAID cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 01:49:16 -0000 Daniel O'Connor wrote: > On Friday 25 August 2006 01:52, Nikolas Britton wrote: >>> I believe Promise *do* support FreeBSD quite a bit. >> Maybe as an after thought. I also don't see any link on their site for >> FreeBSD support, lets check google: > > > cvs log ata-chipset.c.. > ---------------------------- > revision 1.21 > date: 2003/05/01 06:20:50; author: sos; state: Exp; lines: +144 -7 > I'm pleased to announce that Promise is now supporting the FreeBSD > project by providing documentation (under NDA) and hardware for > testing. This commit is the first result of the cooperation, and > adds support for several of their new controllers that we didn't > support before (and probably newer would have without this arrangement). > > Add support for the Promise SATA150 TX2/TX4 and the Promise TX4000 > controllers. This also adds support for various motherboard fitted > Promise SATA/ATA chips. > Note that this code uses memory mapped registers to minimize overhead. > I belive FreeBSD has made another first in the Open Source world > by being able to release support for this :) > ---------------------------- > While this is true, Promise support seems somewhat problematic for the 4 port cards - I have a TX4000 which FreeBSD (4,5,6,7) consistently see no disks attached to - ever, and a SX4060 that gives ATA semaphore timeouts and 'danger Will Robinson' no matter what disks are attached to it... so neither of these are any use to me for FreeBSD, unfortunately (I gave up and installed Gentoo on the box with the TX4000). By comparison, I have a 3ware 7506 which works perfectly. Admittedly, this is all pretty old HW, but I believe there are still similar issues with *some* newer Promise SATA cards.... Cheers Mark From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 25 02:39:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9429116A4DE for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 02:39:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erich@areca.com.tw) Received: from areca.com.tw (220-130-178-143.HINET-IP.hinet.net [220.130.178.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C8443D49 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 02:39:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from erich@areca.com.tw) Received: from erich2003 ([192.168.0.177] unverified) by areca.com.tw with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 25 Aug 2006 10:31:44 +0800 Message-ID: <000801c6c7ef$b4fc69b0$b100a8c0@erich2003> From: "erich" To: "GreenX" References: <6.2.3.4.0.20060731094908.137f4848@64.7.153.2> <00be01c6b510$03060c30$b100a8c0@erich2003> <001d01c6b54c$06085870$b100a8c0@erich2003> <44ED8403.8000903@azimut-tour.ru> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 10:39:34 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C6C832.C19EAF00" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.3790.2663 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2757 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Aug 2006 02:31:44.0875 (UTC) FILETIME=[9B53EBB0:01C6C7EE] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GIANT in arcmsr(4) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 02:39:37 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C6C832.C19EAF00 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear BR, GReenX., I have this last driver on my lab for areca testing procedure. I promised that the driver sould passed testing on Power Mac and SPARC machine. But I can not install FreeBSD 6.0 on my Power Mac G5 system till now. Its coding style not yet all change into unix style. This code had ran more a week of my testing script. You can use it till my final release code for FreeBSD org. Best Regards Erich Chen ----- Original Message ----- From: "GreenX" To: "erich" ; Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 6:48 PM Subject: Re: GIANT in arcmsr(4) > Hi, > I face to a choice - Areca ARC-1110 vs. 3ware 9550SX-4LP. > Whether soon there will be an amendment to the arc driver? > > BR, GReenX. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C6C832.C19EAF00-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 25 15:47:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B678616A4F0 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:47:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.kingsley@enc.edu) Received: from smtp.enc.edu (smtp.enc.edu [64.195.243.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91BA143DBA for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:46:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david.kingsley@enc.edu) Received: from localhost (new-av.r.its.enc.edu [10.100.0.201]) by smtp.enc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71C92E812 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:10:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.enc.edu ([10.100.0.201]) by localhost (smtp.enc.edu [10.100.0.201]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 59174-08 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:10:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.1.10.46] (jezebel.its.enc.edu [10.1.10.46]) by smtp.enc.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D32C2E46A for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 12:10:40 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <44EEE32A.4090909@enc.edu> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:46:50 +0000 From: Dave Kingsley User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20051215) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at enc.edu Subject: RocketRAID 2224 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 15:47:56 -0000 I am attemping to use a RocketRAID 2224 8 channel card to set up a storage server. The server board is an Intel SE7230NH1-E with a P4-D 2.8GHz, 2GB RAM. When I set up a RAID5 with 7 750GB drives I get nothing but wierdness. Using sysinstall -> Configure -> Fdisk I can see the full size: DISK Geometry: 547149 cyls/255 heads/63 sectors = 8789948685 sectors (4291967MB) But Label sees: Disk: da0 Partition name: da0s1 Free: 200014030 blocks (97663MB) What am I doing wrong? All of the drivers seem to installed; at least they say they are. Is this just too big for FreeBSD? I hope not! Help! -- Dave ******************************************************************************* There are 10 types of people. Those who understand binrary ... ...and those who don't ############################################################################### David Kingsley, Systems Administrator Eastern Nazarene College 23 East Elm Avenue Quincy, MA 02170 david.kingsley@enc.edu 617-745-3806 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 25 16:13:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2297D16A4DE for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:13:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF6743D49 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:13:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nikolas.britton@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i27so882180wxd for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:13:37 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Xz1CdGOR48xz3EXVw8+JyPeRh7lEXrgUuCCvjWSUgNC+Sb2oeP/U8lvEvIBfYps6nUqjKamZA1TVErr79K1tMwPKcoFnupgeuAqXNnssdoctQCC7ldF1Dgg5OjtnC9Fjed0ghLTzJBq30l1nFh+HOIEV+m0uTCEg5tu5sTcsP0Y= Received: by 10.70.99.11 with SMTP id w11mr4719939wxb; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:13:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.49.3 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 09:13:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 11:13:37 -0500 From: "Nikolas Britton" To: "Dave Kingsley" In-Reply-To: <44EEE32A.4090909@enc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <44EEE32A.4090909@enc.edu> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RocketRAID 2224 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 16:13:46 -0000 On 8/25/06, Dave Kingsley wrote: > I am attemping to use a RocketRAID 2224 8 channel card to set up a > storage server. The server board is an Intel SE7230NH1-E with a P4-D > 2.8GHz, 2GB RAM. > When I set up a RAID5 with 7 750GB drives I get nothing but wierdness. > Using sysinstall -> Configure -> Fdisk I can see the full size: > DISK Geometry: 547149 cyls/255 heads/63 sectors = 8789948685 sectors > (4291967MB) > > But Label sees: > Disk: da0 Partition name: da0s1 Free: 200014030 blocks (97663MB) > > What am I doing wrong? Nothing. Sysinstall can't handle disks that big. There is a 2TB soft limit. UFS2 can support disks up to 8 ZettaBytes (8,589,934,592 TeraBytes) but some of the software tools have not been converted yet, see here: http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk/index.html -- BSD Podcasts @: http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/ http://freebsdforall.blogspot.com/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 25 17:24:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A87B16A4E1 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:24:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nick@gustas.org) Received: from atlas.summitpolymers.com (24-176-11-122.static.klmz.mi.charter.com [24.176.11.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78AD143D72 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:24:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nick@gustas.org) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (tc1-094.corpdomain.summitpolymers.com [172.16.1.94]) by atlas.summitpolymers.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64AFE15505D for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:24:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <44EF322E.5060402@gustas.org> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 13:23:58 -0400 From: Nick Gustas User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <44EEE32A.4090909@enc.edu> In-Reply-To: <44EEE32A.4090909@enc.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: RocketRAID 2224 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 17:24:02 -0000 Dave Kingsley wrote: > I am attemping to use a RocketRAID 2224 8 channel card to set up a > storage server. The server board is an Intel SE7230NH1-E with a P4-D > 2.8GHz, 2GB RAM. > When I set up a RAID5 with 7 750GB drives I get nothing but wierdness. > Using sysinstall -> Configure -> Fdisk I can see the full size: > DISK Geometry: 547149 cyls/255 heads/63 sectors = 8789948685 sectors > (4291967MB) > > But Label sees: > Disk: da0 Partition name: da0s1 Free: 200014030 blocks (97663MB) > > What am I doing wrong? All of the drivers seem to installed; at least > they say they are. > Is this just too big for FreeBSD? I hope not! > > Help! Zero out the first few tracks of da0 to clean off any cruft and use gpt to create the label (from memory, did this August 2005) gpt create /dev/da0 gpt add /dev/da0 newfs -youroptionshere /dev/da0p1 --------- df -h /3ware Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0p1 4.0T 3.8T 161G 96% /3ware From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 25 18:29:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC6216A4DE for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D1A43D45 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:29:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gothmog.pc (host5.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.229]) (authenticated bits=128) by igloo.linux.gr (8.13.7/8.13.7/Debian-2) with ESMTP id k7PITZCK010628 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:29:36 +0300 Received: from gothmog.pc (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.pc (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k7PITj6g081470; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:29:45 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.pc (8.13.7/8.13.7/Submit) id k7PITjdN081469; Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:29:45 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:29:45 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Ceri Davies , stable@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20060825182945.GJ78862@gothmog.pc> References: <200608232337.k7NNbJT8032059@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060824091852.GE66037@submonkey.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060824091852.GE66037@submonkey.net> X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-3.181, required 5, autolearn=not spam, AWL -0.58, BAYES_00 -2.60, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY 0.00) X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@freebsd.org X-Spam-Status: No Cc: Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialcomms chapter.sgml X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 18:29:54 -0000 On 2006-08-24 10:18, Ceri Davies wrote: >On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 11:37:19PM +0000, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> keramida 2006-08-23 23:37:19 UTC >> >> FreeBSD doc repository >> >> Modified files: >> en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/serialcomms chapter.sgml >> Log: >> Expand the section `Setting a Faster Serial Port Speed', to mention >> ways to set the serial console speed without having to rebuild the >> boot blocks. Note that for releases before 6.1, though, rebuilding >> the boot blocks may be the only option. > > On a related note, is the keyboard multiplexer now good enough for us to > ship a /boot.config containing '-P' on the installation images? Not sure. I think I have heard of problems when kbdmux is used with systems that only have a USB keyboard, but I am not sure if this change would affect the same users. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 26 03:42:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4C516A4DE for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 03:42:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au) Received: from ash25e.internode.on.net (ash25e.internode.on.net [203.16.214.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB9A43D46 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 03:42:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au) Received: from bullseye.apana.org.au (ppp58-48.lns1.cbr1.internode.on.net [59.167.58.48]) by ash25e.internode.on.net (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k7Q3gEH0055165 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:12:14 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au) Received: from [192.168.63.10] (tenring.andymac.org [192.168.63.10]) by bullseye.apana.org.au (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k7Q3gCqM004684 for ; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:42:14 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from andymac@bullseye.andymac.org) Message-ID: <44EFB564.8090004@bullseye.andymac.org> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:43:48 +1100 From: Andrew MacIntyre User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (OS/2/20060727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20060824190651.GA49364@xor.obsecurity.org> <14989d6e0608241410n2b8a5fdwe98a927dea91be40@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <14989d6e0608241410n2b8a5fdwe98a927dea91be40@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [AMD64-SMP] I can't get my cpus working at 100% X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 03:42:17 -0000 Christian Walther wrote: > A nice example of a program being able to do threading, but one CPU > (core) only is python. This is not strictly correct: Python relies on a global interpreter lock (aka GIL) to protect internal data structures. When code in the Python process doesn't require access to these data structures, threads can run outside the influence of the lock and run simultaneously on multiple CPUs. Python's I/O system (eg file/network I/O) and many Python extensions do exactly this. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Andrew I MacIntyre "These thoughts are mine alone..." E-mail: andymac@bullseye.apana.org.au (pref) | Snail: PO Box 370 andymac@pcug.org.au (alt) | Belconnen ACT 2616 Web: http://www.andymac.org/ | Australia From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 26 19:27:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1417916A4DE; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:27:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wjw@digiware.nl) Received: from freebee.digiware.nl (www.tegenbosch28.nl [217.21.251.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AAD243D53; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:27:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wjw@digiware.nl) Received: from [192.168.2.10] (unknown [192.168.2.10]) by freebee.digiware.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700C42AAA0; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:27:35 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44F0A0BD.6040306@digiware.nl> Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:27:57 +0200 From: Willem Jan Withagen User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Ermilov References: <200608141702.k7EH29SV095709@lurza.secnetix.de> <20060814194610.GE63788@rambler-co.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060814194610.GE63788@rambler-co.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: installword with DESTDIR=/nfs doesn't work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 19:27:38 -0000 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 07:02:09PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I just tried to do a "make installworld" with DESTDIR set >> to a directory on an NFS server. It broke like this: >> >> ===> lib/libcom_err/doc (install) >> lockf -k /mnt/data/6.1-TEST/original-tree/usr/share/info/dir install-info --quiet --defsection="Programming & development tools." --defentry="* libcom_err: (com_err). A Common Error Description Library for UNIX." com_err.info /mnt/data/6.1-TEST/original-tree/usr/share/info/dir >> lockf: cannot open /mnt/data/6.1-TEST/original-tree/usr/share/info/dir: Operation not supported >> *** Error code 73 >> Stop in /usr/src/lib/libcom_err/doc. >> *** Error code 1 >> >> Am I missing something? Is installworld over NFS supported >> at all? I could swear I have done it before ... >> > Yes. From build(7): > > : installworld Install everything built by a preceding buildworld step > : into the directory hierarchy pointed to by make(1) vari- > : able DESTDIR. > : > : If installing onto an NFS file system, make sure that > : rpc.lockd(8) is running on both client and server. See > : rc.conf(5) on how to make it start at boot time. Well my problem was that the system I wanted to overwrite had a defect CDrom, but was still running something like 4.x without rpc.lockd really working. Why don't know .... But since I was desperate to upgrade I stopped the installprocess to replace lockf with a dud shellscript. That got me thru. I'm sure it is needed for one reason or another, but would be nice it one could overrule it. --WjW From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 26 22:12:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE77916A526; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:12:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from postman.atlantis.dp.ua (postman.atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.47.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15EB144403; Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:42:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from atlantis.dp.ua (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postman.atlantis.dp.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k7QLgPOn062948; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:42:25 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Received: from localhost (dmitry@localhost) by atlantis.dp.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) with ESMTP id k7QLgPNr062945; Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:42:25 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 00:42:24 +0300 (EEST) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: Ruslan Ermilov In-Reply-To: <20060824082012.GA81296@rambler-co.ru> Message-ID: <20060827002203.A39026@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> References: <5B7BD83A-6316-4C20-903E-B5D66D4F2642@khera.org> <44EB5354.6070007@paladin.bulgarpress.com> <44EB6411.4040406@paladin.bulgarpress.com> <20060823193309.GA77890@rambler-co.ru> <44ECBFE8.7000809@FreeBSD.org> <20060824082012.GA81296@rambler-co.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Doug Barton , freebsd-stable Subject: Re: 5.5 to 6.1 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:12:08 -0000 Hello! On Thu, 24 Aug 2006, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >>> It depends. If options are OPTIONS (in the ports sense), they >>> are saved and independent of portupgrade. If options are >> sysutils/portconf does not have that limitation. If you specify flags using >> that method, they will always be used. >> > True. The implementation is also smart -- it doesn't spam make(1) > environment when not necessary. Thanks! I've tried to use sysutils/portconf, but found that it still doesn't give an universal solution: 1) it doesn't work if /usr/ports is a link to another location. Try e.g. the following configuration: root@homelynx# ls -l /usr/ports lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 9 Aug 27 00:27 /usr/ports -> ftp/ports root@homelynx# cd /usr/ports/net/quagga root@homelynx# realpath . /usr/ftp/ports/net/quagga root@homelynx# grep quagga /usr/local/etc/ports.conf net/quagga: WITH_SNMP=yes root@homelynx# make -V WITH_SNMP root@homelynx# Ports infrastructure itself works OK in this configuration, but sysutils/portconf does not. 2) it still doesn't affect OPTIONS (in the ports sense); try e.g. the following: root@homelynx# realpath . /usr/ports/net/quagga root@homelynx# rm -rf /var/db/ports/quagga root@homelynx# grep quagga /usr/local/etc/ports.conf net/quagga: WITH_SNMP=yes root@homelynx# make You'll see the options menu, and "SNMP support" will be unchecked, so WITH_SNMP will be ignored by the port. Sincerely, Dmitry -- Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE