From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 04:02:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395C716A401; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:02:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from mh2.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [64.129.166.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD8D13C457; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:02:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from neutrino.centtech.com (andersonbox1.centtech.com [192.168.42.21]) by mh2.centtech.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3M42EaS022170; Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:02:17 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <462ADE46.3080304@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:02:14 -0500 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bakul Shah , Eric Anderson , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <20070420195955.GA19042@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <20070420204102.331595B2E@mail.bitblocks.com> <20070420233524.GA23954@saturn.kn-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <20070420233524.GA23954@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/3146/Sat Apr 21 14:39:19 2007 on mh2.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on mh2.centtech.com Cc: Subject: Re: experimental qemu-devel port update, please test! X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 04:02:20 -0000 On 04/20/07 18:35, Juergen Lock wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 01:41:01PM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: >>>>> Or, did something in your kernel change maybe that necessitates >>>>> a rebuild of the kqemu kld? >>>> Evidently that was it - after rebuilding/reinstalling the kqemu module, >>>> all is well. Nothing else changed to make it work. Woohoo! Thanks - >>>> not sure why I didn't think of that.. :) >> For this reason I have >> >> PORTS_MODULES=emulators/kqemu-kmod >> >> in /etc/make.conf so that it gets rebuilt when I rebuild the kernel. >> >>> Right, qemu doesn't come with one (I haven't played with pxe booting >>> yet so I didn't even notice.) >> Actually it does. See /usr/local/share/qemu/pxe-* but due to >> at lease one bug it doesn't work. > > Not for the eepro100 (fxp) varietys. >>>> I >>>> tried to make one, but it still didn't like it. I'm not sure which >>>> selection to pick from the rom-o-matic site. >> I found and fixed one bug in src/core/osloader.c (in >> etherboot-5.4.3 code) which allows me to get a little bit >> further. If anyone wants to play with this more, I can send >> them my changes. > > You may want to post those on the qemu list... > > Juergen On this list too, since I'm not subscribed to the qemu list (nor are many people on this list I'm guessing). Eric From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 12:35:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC4316A400 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:35:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wilkinsa@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au) Received: from digger1.defence.gov.au (digger1.defence.gov.au [203.5.217.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C52113C44B for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:35:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wilkinsa@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au) Received: from ednmsw510.dsto.defence.gov.au (ednmsw510.dsto.defence.gov.au [131.185.68.11]) by digger1.defence.gov.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3MCQI04017102 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:56:18 +0930 (CST) Received: from ednex510.dsto.defence.gov.au (ednex510.dsto.defence.gov.au) by ednmsw510.dsto.defence.gov.au (Clearswift SMTPRS 5.2.5) with ESMTP id for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:05:24 +0930 Received: from obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au ([203.6.60.208]) by ednex510.dsto.defence.gov.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:05:23 +0930 Received: from obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3MCZ4fZ010449 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 20:35:05 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from wilkinsa@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au) Received: (from wilkinsa@localhost) by obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3MCZ40s010448 for emulation@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 20:35:04 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from wilkinsa) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 20:35:04 +0800 From: "Wilkinson, Alex" To: emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070422123504.GF9939@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au> Mail-Followup-To: emulation@freebsd.org References: <20070420064859.GE616@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au> <20070420082156.GA37063@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070420082156.GA37063@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Apr 2007 12:35:24.0160 (UTC) FILETIME=[B2D83800:01C784DA] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: [net/citrix_ica/] /usr/local/bin/wfcmgr ... hangs upon exec(). X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:35:31 -0000 0n Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:21:56AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: >On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 02:48:59PM +0800, Wilkinson, Alex wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I use net/citrix_ica/ daily running on FreeBSD CURRENT. >> One of the tools that comes bundled with the port is wfcmgr >> (used for managing your applications to connect to). >> >> Problem: >> -------- >> >> /usr/local/bin/wfcmgr HANGS. :( >> >> ^t says: >> >> load: 0.37 cmd: wfcmgr 727 [ptsopn] 0.19u 0.23s 2% 7040k >> load: 0.37 cmd: wfcmgr 727 [ptsopn] 0.19u 0.23s 2% 7040k >> >> When Alexander Leidinger updated compat.linux.osrelease to >> 2.6.16 this problem disappeared. However, it has reared its >> ugly head again. >> >> Question: >> -------- >> >> Can someone please give me a helping hand to debug this ? >> ktrace,truss,strace, gdb ? Just let me know. > >rebuild linuxulator with -DDEBUG=1 and put the messages somewhere (web?) >I'll try to get some time to look at it. but ptsopn doesn't sound linuxulator >related... we'll see > >please post the message, thnx erm, roman, can you define "linuxulator". Are you talking about: emulators/linux_base-fc4/ ? Or /boot/kernel/linux.ko ? And if its the latter, can you provide instructions ? Also why do we have some many linux_base-* in the ports ? How is one meant to determine which is the 'correct' one to use ? -aW IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 13:06:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35E116A406 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:06:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wilkinsa@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au) Received: from digger1.defence.gov.au (digger1.defence.gov.au [203.5.217.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BFEE13C480 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:06:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wilkinsa@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au) Received: from ednmsw510.dsto.defence.gov.au (ednmsw510.dsto.defence.gov.au [131.185.68.11]) by digger1.defence.gov.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3MCvIw5019908 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:27:18 +0930 (CST) Received: from ednex510.dsto.defence.gov.au (ednex510.dsto.defence.gov.au) by ednmsw510.dsto.defence.gov.au (Clearswift SMTPRS 5.2.5) with ESMTP id for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:36:24 +0930 Received: from obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au ([203.6.60.208]) by ednex510.dsto.defence.gov.au with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Sun, 22 Apr 2007 22:36:24 +0930 Received: from obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3MD65La010574 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:06:05 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from wilkinsa@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au) Received: (from wilkinsa@localhost) by obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3MD65HO010573 for emulation@freebsd.org; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:06:05 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from wilkinsa) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 21:06:04 +0800 From: "Wilkinson, Alex" To: emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070422130604.GI9939@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au> Mail-Followup-To: emulation@freebsd.org References: <20070420064859.GE616@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au> <20070420082156.GA37063@freebsd.org> <20070420103244.nqkp70q4n40k4oc0@webmail.leidinger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070420103244.nqkp70q4n40k4oc0@webmail.leidinger.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Apr 2007 13:06:24.0622 (UTC) FILETIME=[07C430E0:01C784DF] Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: [net/citrix_ica/] /usr/local/bin/wfcmgr ... hangs upon exec(). X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 13:06:31 -0000 0n Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:32:44AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >Hmmm... do you by chance have kern.pts.enable=1? If yes, AFAIR there's >a know problem with it (not linuxulator related). Disable it please >then. Was never enabled. #sysctl kern.pts.enable kern.pts.enable: 0 Can someone post instructions of adding DEBUG into the linuxolator. I really want to get to the bottom of this. -aW IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence Organisation and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the CRIMES ACT 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 22 17:09:08 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3331416A407 for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:09:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from redbull.bpaserver.net (redbullneu.bpaserver.net [213.198.78.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E264413C45D for ; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:09:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p54A5D506.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.213.6]) by redbull.bpaserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055DB2E139; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:09:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from deskjail (deskjail.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.109]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A89E5B4817; Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:08:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 19:09:27 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: "Wilkinson, Alex" Message-ID: <20070422190927.579b0c17@deskjail> In-Reply-To: <20070422123504.GF9939@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au> References: <20070420064859.GE616@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au> <20070420082156.GA37063@freebsd.org> <20070422123504.GF9939@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BPAnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-BPAnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BPAnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-14.787, required 8, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -15.00, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME 0.00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14, TW_HN 0.08) X-BPAnet-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-Spam-Status: No Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [net/citrix_ica/] /usr/local/bin/wfcmgr ... hangs upon exec(). X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 17:09:08 -0000 Quoting "Wilkinson, Alex" (Sun, 22 Apr 2007 20:35:04 +0800): > 0n Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 10:21:56AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > >rebuild linuxulator with -DDEBUG=1 and put the messages somewhere (web?) > >I'll try to get some time to look at it. but ptsopn doesn't sound linuxulator > >related... we'll see > > > >please post the message, thnx > > erm, roman, can you define "linuxulator". Are you talking about: > emulators/linux_base-fc4/ ? Or /boot/kernel/linux.ko ? > > And if its the latter, can you provide instructions ? Add CFLAGS+=-DDEBUG=1 to /sys/modules/linux/Makefile. > Also why do we have some many linux_base-* in the ports ? How is one meant to > determine which is the 'correct' one to use ? Every linux port depends upon the right one. All other are for testing or special purposes. Bye, Alexander. -- http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 11:08:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C0C16A4E1 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:08:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF30A13C468 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:08:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (linimon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l3NB8RWT093086 for ; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:08:27 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l3NB8QcQ093082 for freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:08:26 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:08:26 GMT Message-Id: <200704231108.l3NB8QcQ093082@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: linimon set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:08:28 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/21463 emulation [linux] Linux compatability mode should not allow setu o kern/77710 emulation [linux] Linux page fault sigcontext information is wro o kern/101453 emulation [linux] [patch] linprocfs disallows non-zero file offs o kern/102956 emulation [linux] [patch] Add partial support for SO_PEERCRED in 4 problems total. Non-critical problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/11165 emulation [ibcs2] IBCS2 doesn't work correctly with PID_MAX 9999 o kern/29698 emulation [linux] [patch] linux ipcs doesn'work o kern/39201 emulation [linux] [patch] ptrace(2) and rfork(RFLINUXTHPN) confu o kern/41543 emulation [patch] feature request: easier wine/w23 support o kern/55835 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux IPC emulation missing SETALL sys a kern/72920 emulation [linux]: path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain s o kern/73777 emulation [linux] [patch] linux emulation: root dir special hand o kern/91293 emulation [svr4] [patch] *Experimental* Update to the SVR4 emula o ports/110632 emulation [patch] x11-fonts/linux-fontconfig is not X11BASE clea 9 problems total. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 23 19:56:07 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C634F16A400; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:56:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Received: from mail.bitblocks.com (ns1.bitblocks.com [64.142.15.60]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA56113C483; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:56:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Received: from bitblocks.com (localhost.bitblocks.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bitblocks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77F65B3B; Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:23:09 -0700 (PDT) To: Eric Anderson In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 21 Apr 2007 23:02:14 CDT." <462ADE46.3080304@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:23:09 -0700 From: Bakul Shah Message-Id: <20070423192309.E77F65B3B@mail.bitblocks.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: experimental qemu-devel port update, please test! X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 19:56:07 -0000 > >> I found and fixed one bug in src/core/osloader.c (in > >> etherboot-5.4.3 code) which allows me to get a little bit > >> further. If anyone wants to play with this more, I can send > >> them my changes. > > > > You may want to post those on the qemu list... > > On this list too, since I'm not subscribed to the qemu list (nor are > many people on this list I'm guessing). The change I am talking about is in etherboot-5.4.3 code, not in qemu. I tried upgrading ports/net/etherboot 5.4.3 but my effort is not in a usable state right now. Download etherboot-5.4.3.tar.bz2, untar it, cd to its top dir and apply the following patch -- this is the only critical change. And I borrowed other changes from the current net/etherboot port. If you can compile rtl8139.zrom fine, run qemu with an explicit -option-rom argument and make sure you use model=rtl8139. it will use dhcp to get an address, load freebsd's pxeboot and jump to it at which point everything halts. May be etherboot does too much. Since freebsd does pxeboot on a real machine, ideally the exact same pxeboot should work with etherboot. --- src/core/osloader.c.orig Sat Feb 24 06:44:59 2007 +++ src/core/osloader.c Sat Apr 21 21:50:37 2007 @@ -344,6 +344,8 @@ } #endif /* defined(ELF_IMAGE) && defined(IMAGE_MULTIBOOT) */ + if (!len) goto done; + /* Either len is greater or the skip is greater */ if ((skip_sectors > (len >> 9)) || ((skip_sectors == (len >> 9)) && (skip_bytes >= (len & 0x1ff)))) { @@ -355,6 +357,7 @@ skip_bytes -= len; } else { + done: len -= (skip_sectors << 9) + skip_bytes; data += (skip_sectors << 9) + skip_bytes; skip_sectors = os_download(data, len, eof); From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 09:09:49 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05CFD16A412 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:09:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (vlk.vlakno.cz [62.168.28.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BD913C4DB for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:09:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA4F8BD2DE for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:09:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vlk.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TkyINTYSMRwP for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:09:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB3B8BD23D for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:09:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3O99d07065742 for emulation@freebsd.org; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:09:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:09:38 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070424090938.GA65721@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Subject: a patch to test X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:09:49 -0000 hi the linux-opera 9.2 as it is in ports doesn't start and hangs. can someone try this patch www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/pav.patch and tell me if it fixes it? I have almost no time these days and I wrote the patch some time ago and now I just remembered I did :) thnx roman From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 10:27:39 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5344416A404 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:27:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottro@nyc.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com [24.29.109.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A56F13C45E for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:27:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottro@nyc.rr.com) Received: from localhost (cpe-69-203-84-92.nyc.res.rr.com [69.203.84.92]) by ms-smtp-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3OARbq4015971; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:27:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:27:37 -0400 From: Scott Robbins To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070424102737.GA92200@mail.scottro.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, emulation@freebsd.org References: <20070424090938.GA65721@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070424090938.GA65721@freebsd.org> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Cc: Subject: Re: a patch to test X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:27:39 -0000 On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 11:09:38AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > hi > > the linux-opera 9.2 as it is in ports doesn't start and hangs. > > can someone try this patch > > www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/pav.patch > > and tell me if it fixes it? I have almost no time these days and I wrote > the patch some time ago and now I just remembered I did :) The latest linux-opera (20070409_2) has been working for me without problem, without a patch, both on CURRENT and STABLE. There was a problem around 2 weeks ago, but I thought the latest revision (the _2, I guess) fixed it. (There was a thread on forums.bsdnexus.com about it--it seemed to be fixed for everyone after the latest revision.) http://forums.bsdnexus.com/viewtopic.php?id=1639 -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Xander: You're considered somewhat cool. Oz: I am? Xander: Is it because you always tend to express yourself in short, non-commital sentences? Oz: Could be. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 11:09:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8AB16A406; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:09:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (vlk.vlakno.cz [62.168.28.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF5A13C455; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:09:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC668BD2ED; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:09:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vlk.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vj2qB3cK-9qC; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:09:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C03E8BD2EC; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:09:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3OB9S8N068804; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:09:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:09:28 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070424110928.GA68624@freebsd.org> References: <20070424090938.GA65721@freebsd.org> <20070424102737.GA92200@mail.scottro.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070424102737.GA92200@mail.scottro.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Subject: Re: a patch to test X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:09:31 -0000 On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 06:27:37AM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 11:09:38AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > > hi > > > > the linux-opera 9.2 as it is in ports doesn't start and hangs. > > > > can someone try this patch > > > > www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/pav.patch > > > > and tell me if it fixes it? I have almost no time these days and I wrote > > the patch some time ago and now I just remembered I did :) > > The latest linux-opera (20070409_2) has been working for me without > problem, without a patch, both on CURRENT and STABLE. thats a workaround ;) my patch should fix the issue, can you revert the last opera revisin and test my patch? this problem (that linxu and fbsd differ on the view what shm pages are accessible) can show up in some other programs and my fix fixes it all please test :) roman From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 11:09:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8AB16A406; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:09:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (vlk.vlakno.cz [62.168.28.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF5A13C455; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:09:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC668BD2ED; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:09:30 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vlk.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vj2qB3cK-9qC; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:09:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C03E8BD2EC; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:09:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3OB9S8N068804; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:09:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 13:09:28 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070424110928.GA68624@freebsd.org> References: <20070424090938.GA65721@freebsd.org> <20070424102737.GA92200@mail.scottro.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070424102737.GA92200@mail.scottro.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Subject: Re: a patch to test X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:09:31 -0000 On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 06:27:37AM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 11:09:38AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > > hi > > > > the linux-opera 9.2 as it is in ports doesn't start and hangs. > > > > can someone try this patch > > > > www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/pav.patch > > > > and tell me if it fixes it? I have almost no time these days and I wrote > > the patch some time ago and now I just remembered I did :) > > The latest linux-opera (20070409_2) has been working for me without > problem, without a patch, both on CURRENT and STABLE. thats a workaround ;) my patch should fix the issue, can you revert the last opera revisin and test my patch? this problem (that linxu and fbsd differ on the view what shm pages are accessible) can show up in some other programs and my fix fixes it all please test :) roman From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 11:16:48 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C0816A404 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:16:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottro@nyc.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com [24.29.109.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8A613C45A for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:16:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottro@nyc.rr.com) Received: from localhost (cpe-69-203-84-92.nyc.res.rr.com [69.203.84.92]) by ms-smtp-01.rdc-nyc.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l3OARbq4015971; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:27:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 06:27:37 -0400 From: Scott Robbins To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070424102737.GA92200@mail.scottro.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, emulation@freebsd.org References: <20070424090938.GA65721@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070424090938.GA65721@freebsd.org> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Cc: Subject: Re: a patch to test X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:16:48 -0000 On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 11:09:38AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > hi > > the linux-opera 9.2 as it is in ports doesn't start and hangs. > > can someone try this patch > > www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/pav.patch > > and tell me if it fixes it? I have almost no time these days and I wrote > the patch some time ago and now I just remembered I did :) The latest linux-opera (20070409_2) has been working for me without problem, without a patch, both on CURRENT and STABLE. There was a problem around 2 weeks ago, but I thought the latest revision (the _2, I guess) fixed it. (There was a thread on forums.bsdnexus.com about it--it seemed to be fixed for everyone after the latest revision.) http://forums.bsdnexus.com/viewtopic.php?id=1639 -- Scott Robbins PGP keyID EB3467D6 ( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 Xander: You're considered somewhat cool. Oz: I am? Xander: Is it because you always tend to express yourself in short, non-commital sentences? Oz: Could be. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 11:39:25 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1406E16A402; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:39:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from relay02.kiev.sovam.com (relay02.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09E613C448; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:39:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from [212.82.216.227] (helo=fw.zoral.com.ua) by relay02.kiev.sovam.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HgJ6a-0002HN-Uj; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:22:45 +0300 Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by fw.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l3OBMa5x068756 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:22:36 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l3OBMZeu042953; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:22:35 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l3OBMVjQ042952; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:22:31 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 14:22:31 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov To: Bakul Shah Message-ID: <20070424112231.GC2441@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <462ADE46.3080304@freebsd.org> <20070423192309.E77F65B3B@mail.bitblocks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070423192309.E77F65B3B@mail.bitblocks.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.7, clamav-milter version 0.88.7 on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Scanner-Signature: 33ca3efb02d57e4381ef3dfbedf9ea6a X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: kostikbel@gmail.com X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 976 [Apr 24 2007] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {received from trusted relay: not dialup} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Method: Local Lists X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: experimental qemu-devel port update, please test! X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:39:25 -0000 --5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 12:23:09PM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: > > >> I found and fixed one bug in src/core/osloader.c (in > > >> etherboot-5.4.3 code) which allows me to get a little bit > > >> further. If anyone wants to play with this more, I can send > > >> them my changes. > > >=20 > > > You may want to post those on the qemu list... > >=20 > > On this list too, since I'm not subscribed to the qemu list (nor are=20 > > many people on this list I'm guessing). >=20 > The change I am talking about is in etherboot-5.4.3 code, not > in qemu. I tried upgrading ports/net/etherboot 5.4.3 but my > effort is not in a usable state right now. >=20 > Download etherboot-5.4.3.tar.bz2, untar it, cd to its top dir > and apply the following patch -- this is the only critical > change. And I borrowed other changes from the current > net/etherboot port. >=20 > If you can compile rtl8139.zrom fine, run qemu with > an explicit -option-rom argument and make sure you use > model=3Drtl8139. >=20 > it will use dhcp to get an address, load freebsd's > pxeboot and jump to it at which point everything halts. >=20 > May be etherboot does too much. Since freebsd does pxeboot > on a real machine, ideally the exact same pxeboot should work > with etherboot. >=20 > --- src/core/osloader.c.orig Sat Feb 24 06:44:59 2007 > +++ src/core/osloader.c Sat Apr 21 21:50:37 2007 > @@ -344,6 +344,8 @@ > } > #endif /* defined(ELF_IMAGE) && defined(IMAGE_MULTIBOOT) */ > =20 > + if (!len) goto done; > + > /* Either len is greater or the skip is greater */ > if ((skip_sectors > (len >> 9)) || > ((skip_sectors =3D=3D (len >> 9)) && (skip_bytes >=3D (len & 0x1ff))))= { > @@ -355,6 +357,7 @@ > skip_bytes -=3D len; > } > else { > + done: > len -=3D (skip_sectors << 9) + skip_bytes; > data +=3D (skip_sectors << 9) + skip_bytes; > skip_sectors =3D os_download(data, len, eof); You may try the following patch for btx: http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/realbtx/realbtx.2.patch or take the pxeboot built from the patched source at http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/realbtx/pxeboot Please, handle the patch with care - do not install /boot/boot2 or /boot/loader built with patch on the machine without ability to boot from removable media, since the changes are in earliest stage and were not tested exhaustive. --5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGLeh2C3+MBN1Mb4gRAth3AKCra4lq/GOQVH+gU4A4OLGKS7V9rwCgzNsv PKQWfHxSdVxJHAogtu8l2vo= =anrd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5/uDoXvLw7AC5HRs-- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 12:08:42 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A54E16A400 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:08:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from mh1.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [64.129.166.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A35D13C455 for ; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:08:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Received: from neutrino.centtech.com (neutrino.centtech.com [10.177.171.220]) by mh1.centtech.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l3OC8bGU031065; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:08:37 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from anderson@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <462DF345.8000606@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:08:37 -0500 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (X11/20070420) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kostik Belousov References: <462ADE46.3080304@freebsd.org> <20070423192309.E77F65B3B@mail.bitblocks.com> <20070424112231.GC2441@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <20070424112231.GC2441@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.4/3154/Tue Apr 24 01:13:03 2007 on mh1.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=8.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on mh1.centtech.com Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: experimental qemu-devel port update, please test! X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:08:42 -0000 On 04/24/07 06:22, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 12:23:09PM -0700, Bakul Shah wrote: >>>>> I found and fixed one bug in src/core/osloader.c (in >>>>> etherboot-5.4.3 code) which allows me to get a little bit >>>>> further. If anyone wants to play with this more, I can send >>>>> them my changes. >>>> You may want to post those on the qemu list... >>> On this list too, since I'm not subscribed to the qemu list (nor are >>> many people on this list I'm guessing). >> The change I am talking about is in etherboot-5.4.3 code, not >> in qemu. I tried upgrading ports/net/etherboot 5.4.3 but my >> effort is not in a usable state right now. >> >> Download etherboot-5.4.3.tar.bz2, untar it, cd to its top dir >> and apply the following patch -- this is the only critical >> change. And I borrowed other changes from the current >> net/etherboot port. >> >> If you can compile rtl8139.zrom fine, run qemu with >> an explicit -option-rom argument and make sure you use >> model=rtl8139. >> >> it will use dhcp to get an address, load freebsd's >> pxeboot and jump to it at which point everything halts. >> >> May be etherboot does too much. Since freebsd does pxeboot >> on a real machine, ideally the exact same pxeboot should work >> with etherboot. >> >> --- src/core/osloader.c.orig Sat Feb 24 06:44:59 2007 >> +++ src/core/osloader.c Sat Apr 21 21:50:37 2007 >> @@ -344,6 +344,8 @@ >> } >> #endif /* defined(ELF_IMAGE) && defined(IMAGE_MULTIBOOT) */ >> >> + if (!len) goto done; >> + >> /* Either len is greater or the skip is greater */ >> if ((skip_sectors > (len >> 9)) || >> ((skip_sectors == (len >> 9)) && (skip_bytes >= (len & 0x1ff)))) { >> @@ -355,6 +357,7 @@ >> skip_bytes -= len; >> } >> else { >> + done: >> len -= (skip_sectors << 9) + skip_bytes; >> data += (skip_sectors << 9) + skip_bytes; >> skip_sectors = os_download(data, len, eof); > > You may try the following patch for btx: > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/realbtx/realbtx.2.patch > or take the pxeboot built from the patched source at > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/realbtx/pxeboot > > Please, handle the patch with care - do not install /boot/boot2 or > /boot/loader built with patch on the machine without ability to boot > from removable media, since the changes are in earliest stage and were not > tested exhaustive. I can confirm this works like a charm!!!! I had to send pxelinux.0 to the QEMU system first, and then have it load the pxeboot file you created above (I used the binary). It boots my QEMU NFS root system perfectly.. AWESOME!!!! Anything else you want to test? Thanks! Eric From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 24 12:25:20 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770E116A402; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:25:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from relay01.kiev.sovam.com (relay01.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D39713C43E; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:25:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from [212.82.216.227] (helo=fw.zoral.com.ua) by relay01.kiev.sovam.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HgK57-0007cW-RW; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:25:18 +0300 Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (root@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua [10.1.1.148]) by fw.zoral.com.ua (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l3OCPB5C070590 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:25:11 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l3OCPBPk044221; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:25:11 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id l3OCPBbL044220; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:25:11 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 15:25:11 +0300 From: Kostik Belousov To: Eric Anderson Message-ID: <20070424122511.GD2441@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <462ADE46.3080304@freebsd.org> <20070423192309.E77F65B3B@mail.bitblocks.com> <20070424112231.GC2441@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <462DF345.8000606@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xesSdrSSBC0PokLI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <462DF345.8000606@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.7, clamav-milter version 0.88.7 on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=failed version=3.1.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on fw.zoral.com.ua X-Scanner-Signature: f2683d8df775da069012ccac6e6e6321 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: kostikbel@gmail.com X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 976 [Apr 24 2007] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {received from trusted relay: not dialup} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Method: Local Lists X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: experimental qemu-devel port update, please test! X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 12:25:20 -0000 --xesSdrSSBC0PokLI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 07:08:37AM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote: > On 04/24/07 06:22, Kostik Belousov wrote: > >You may try the following patch for btx: > >http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/realbtx/realbtx.2.patch > >or take the pxeboot built from the patched source at > >http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/realbtx/pxeboot > > > >Please, handle the patch with care - do not install /boot/boot2 or > >/boot/loader built with patch on the machine without ability to boot > >from removable media, since the changes are in earliest stage and were n= ot > >tested exhaustive. >=20 >=20 >=20 > I can confirm this works like a charm!!!! >=20 > I had to send pxelinux.0 to the QEMU system first, and then have it load= =20 > the pxeboot file you created above (I used the binary). It boots my=20 > QEMU NFS root system perfectly.. >=20 > AWESOME!!!! >=20 > Anything else you want to test? Mostly, it lucks testing on the real hardware. As was mentioned, after the patch applied, buildworld would create new boot2, loader and pxeloader. Testing any of them on diverse real hardware is required before planning to put the change into the CVS in some way. --xesSdrSSBC0PokLI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGLfcmC3+MBN1Mb4gRAi7lAKCuXFVU19cuIOg+p80LwEIJZSzGrQCdHLsP Qm7W5eGfDvFLQUNHZgPGyrg= =oUT0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xesSdrSSBC0PokLI-- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 04:05:47 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243A916A402; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:05:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@rsync.net) Received: from mail.rsync.net (mail.rsync.net [69.43.165.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C3F13C44C; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:05:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@rsync.net) Received: from mail.rsync.net (mail.rsync.net [69.43.165.11]) by mail.rsync.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3P3fx8Z079904; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:41:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from info@rsync.net) Received: from localhost (info@localhost) by mail.rsync.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id l3P3fxUh079901; Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:41:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from info@rsync.net) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.rsync.net: info owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:41:59 -0700 (PDT) From: "rsync.net" To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070424203552.S92308@mail.rsync.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-announce@freebsd.org Subject: Vmware 5.5 on FreeBSD: Bounty sponsored and formalized by rsync.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 04:05:47 -0000 rsync.net is pleased to announce Code Bounties for 2007: http://www.rsync.net/resources/notices/2007cb.html Two of the five bounties are for FreeBSD related projects. Please take note of the "Vmware 5.5 on FreeBSD" bounty - we encourage you to contribute. We are optimistic that once the bounty exceeds a few thousand dollars someone will indeed take on this project. Further, we are soliciting help (and funds) from vmware themselves. As always, thank you (the community) for all of your work and support. --rsync.net From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 12:29:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03B6E16A400; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:29:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from piechota@acropolis.argolis.org) Received: from vms046pub.verizon.net (vms046pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6FB13C46C; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:29:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from piechota@acropolis.argolis.org) Received: from acropolis.argolis.org ([71.162.149.172]) by vms046.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JH2005GD001EVIQ@vms046.mailsrvcs.net>; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 07:28:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from piechota (helo=localhost) by acropolis.argolis.org with local-esmtp (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1HggVz-000ITT-Ve; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:22:36 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:22:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Piechota In-reply-to: <20070424203552.S92308@mail.rsync.net> Sender: Matt Piechota To: "rsync.net" Message-id: <20070425081626.Y39661@acropolis.argolis.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed References: <20070424203552.S92308@mail.rsync.net> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-announce@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] Vmware 5.5 on FreeBSD: Bounty sponsored and formalized by rsync.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:29:11 -0000 On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, rsync.net wrote: > rsync.net is pleased to announce Code Bounties for 2007: > > http://www.rsync.net/resources/notices/2007cb.html > > Two of the five bounties are for FreeBSD related projects. Please take > note of the "Vmware 5.5 on FreeBSD" bounty - we encourage you to > contribute. I'm curious: assuming 'VMware 5.5' refers to VMware Workstation 5.5, why did you choose that over VMware Server 1.0.2, the no-cost product? I don't believe VMware Workstation has any features over VMware Server, and VMware Convertor can copy VMs between versions (if there is a even a difference in format at all) if you needed to move machines from previous setups. -- Matt Piechota From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 13:38:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703A916A401 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:38:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@rsync.net) Received: from mail.rsync.net (mail.rsync.net [69.43.165.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570FD13C448 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:38:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@rsync.net) Received: from mail.rsync.net (mail.rsync.net [69.43.165.11]) by mail.rsync.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l3PDcXIm091113; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:38:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from info@rsync.net) Received: from localhost (info@localhost) by mail.rsync.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) with ESMTP id l3PDcX4a091110; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:38:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from info@rsync.net) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.rsync.net: info owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 06:38:33 -0700 (PDT) From: "rsync.net" To: Matt Piechota In-Reply-To: <20070425081626.Y39661@acropolis.argolis.org> Message-ID: <20070425063402.X92308@mail.rsync.net> References: <20070424203552.S92308@mail.rsync.net> <20070425081626.Y39661@acropolis.argolis.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] Vmware 5.5 on FreeBSD: Bounty sponsored and formalized by rsync.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 13:38:11 -0000 Matt, On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Matt Piechota wrote: > > rsync.net is pleased to announce Code Bounties for 2007: > > > > http://www.rsync.net/resources/notices/2007cb.html > > > > Two of the five bounties are for FreeBSD related projects. Please take > > note of the "Vmware 5.5 on FreeBSD" bounty - we encourage you to > > contribute. > > I'm curious: assuming 'VMware 5.5' refers to VMware Workstation 5.5, why > did you choose that over VMware Server 1.0.2, the no-cost product? I > don't believe VMware Workstation has any features over VMware Server, and > VMware Convertor can copy VMs between versions (if there is a > even a difference in format at all) if you needed to move machines from > previous setups. Vmware workstation has more features and capabilities, and is better suited to application development, etc. I don't believe you can do things like create state snapshots in server. I like this quote: "VMware Workstation is better for software testing, VMware Server is the choice for actually doing real work." (from http://kontrawize.blogs.com/kontrawize/2006/03/vmware_server_v.html) If you're already using FreeBSD for actual server use, I think jail is a good choice for segmenting servers. For me personally, and for rsync.net, what we really need is the ability to rapidly test and verify Windows (and Linux) GUI applications. Also, the upcoming 3d virtualization from vmware workstation will be quite nice... From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 18:15:59 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5EB416A403 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottro@nyc.rr.com) Received: from mail13.simplicato.com (mail13.simplicato.com [207.99.47.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D74013C4B0 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottro@nyc.rr.com) Received: from mail13.simplicato.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail13.simplicato.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649E477AEC4; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:15:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: from uws1.starlofashions.com (unknown [12.44.50.124]) by mail13.simplicato.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F05077AEC3; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:15:58 -0400 (EDT) Received: by uws1.starlofashions.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:15:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 14:15:57 -0400 From: Scott Robbins To: "rsync.net" Message-ID: <20070425181557.GD45941@uws1.starlofashions.com> Mail-Followup-To: "rsync.net" , Matt Piechota , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org References: <20070424203552.S92308@mail.rsync.net> <20070425081626.Y39661@acropolis.argolis.org> <20070425063402.X92308@mail.rsync.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070425063402.X92308@mail.rsync.net> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Matt Piechota Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] Vmware 5.5 on FreeBSD: Bounty sponsored and formalized by rsync.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:15:59 -0000 On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 06:38:33AM -0700, rsync.net wrote: > > Matt, > > On Wed, 25 Apr 2007, Matt Piechota wrote: > > > > rsync.net is pleased to announce Code Bounties for 2007: > > > > > > http://www.rsync.net/resources/notices/2007cb.html > > > > > > Two of the five bounties are for FreeBSD related projects. Please take > > > note of the "Vmware 5.5 on FreeBSD" bounty - we encourage you to > > > contribute. > > > > I'm curious: assuming 'VMware 5.5' refers to VMware Workstation 5.5, why > > did you choose that over VMware Server 1.0.2, the no-cost product? I > > don't believe VMware Workstation has any features over VMware Server, and > > VMware Convertor can copy VMs between versions (if there is a > > even a difference in format at all) if you needed to move machines from > > previous setups. This question came up on emulation, where someone was willing to offer a bounty and a few more of us liked the idea. Like Matt, I said that I would prefer vmware-server as it's free. However, the gentleman who originally posted the bounty agreed with the comments that I ruthlessly snipped, that there are apparently several advantages to workstation. (For myself, like Matt, vmware-server would be more than adequate--my only hope would be that perhaps, if you folks were able to port workstation you could throw server in--maybe it's only a bit more effort.) -- Scott Robbins GPG KeyID EB3467D6 ( 1B848 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 D575 EB34 67D6 ) gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys EB3467D6 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 03:31:23 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5ED16A401; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:31:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mv@thebeastie.org) Received: from p4.roq.com (ns1.ecoms.com [207.44.130.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C9913C45A; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:31:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mv@thebeastie.org) Received: from p4.roq.com (localhost.roq.com [127.0.0.1]) by p4.roq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C215D4CE7C; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:11:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smitch7.jumbuck.com (p82.jumbuck.com [206.112.99.82]) by p4.roq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999F74C9AA; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:11:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smitch7.jumbuck.com (mail.jumbuck.com [206.112.99.82]) by smitch7.jumbuck.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C46410EDA; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:11:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beaste5.jumbuck.com (melbourne.jumbuck.com [150.101.166.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smitch7.jumbuck.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C7C410EB0; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:11:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beaste5.jumbuck.com (beast5 [192.168.46.105]) by beaste5.jumbuck.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DB2209D265; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:11:08 +1000 (EST) Received: from beast2.jumbuck.com (unknown [192.168.46.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by beaste5.jumbuck.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C854209D1CE; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:11:08 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <463169CB.8050304@thebeastie.org> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:11:07 +1000 From: Michael Vince User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070314 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-database@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Oracle 10g on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 03:31:23 -0000 Hi All, I have been contemplating buying a high end server and running a lot of stuff on it in jails including Oracle 10g under linux emu. I would be using Amd64 as the server would have 8gigs of ram or more. The idea would be that the Oracle 10g would just be a slave server to a dedicated 10g server on linux and would act as a emergency backup to the real server and consolidate some rack space at the same time, and hopefully could do some lighter amount work such as read queries. Anyone gone down this path with 10g? I was thinking that since the linux emulation has been getting a fair bit of work lately it would be good to try and really utilize it. Cheers, Mike From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 07:30:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CA1516A400 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:30:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (vlk.vlakno.cz [62.168.28.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0363A13C45E for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29B598BD338; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:30:07 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vlk.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9WqkkNIvdnwD; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:30:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0A08BD10B; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:30:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3R7U5If078399; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:30:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:30:05 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: Michael Vince Message-ID: <20070427073005.GA78362@freebsd.org> References: <463169CB.8050304@thebeastie.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <463169CB.8050304@thebeastie.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-database@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Oracle 10g on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:30:09 -0000 On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 01:11:07PM +1000, Michael Vince wrote: > Hi All, > > I have been contemplating buying a high end server and running a lot of > stuff on it in jails including Oracle 10g under linux emu. > I would be using Amd64 as the server would have 8gigs of ram or more. > The idea would be that the Oracle 10g would just be a slave server to a > dedicated 10g server on linux and would act as a emergency backup to the > real server and consolidate some rack space at the same time, and > hopefully could do some lighter amount work such as read queries. > > Anyone gone down this path with 10g? I was thinking that since the linux > emulation has been getting a fair bit of work lately it would be good to > try and really utilize it. I think you need linux_aio which is only in p4 and awaits final review or something. you also need correct TLS (present in cvs) and corrrect futexes (present in my head, will appear in cvs in a few days) with this I think you should be able to test the oracle :) roman From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 07:43:31 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A74216A406 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:43:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from redbull.bpaserver.net (redbullneu.bpaserver.net [213.198.78.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C43A213C465 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:43:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (unknown [84.165.198.92]) by redbull.bpaserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BFA2E287; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:43:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBC95B4BE0; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:43:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3R7hAFi059709; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:43:10 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:43:10 +0200 Message-ID: <20070427094310.gtvywoy99cccko8g@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:43:10 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Michael Vince References: <463169CB.8050304@thebeastie.org> In-Reply-To: <463169CB.8050304@thebeastie.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.3) / FreeBSD-7.0 X-BPAnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-BPAnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BPAnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-14.364, required 8, BAYES_00 -15.00, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME 0.00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14, NO_RDNS 0.50) X-BPAnet-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-database@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Oracle 10g on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:43:31 -0000 Quoting Michael Vince (from Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:11:07 +1000): > I have been contemplating buying a high end server and running a lot of > stuff on it in jails including Oracle 10g under linux emu. > I would be using Amd64 as the server would have 8gigs of ram or more. You will not be able to use this much of RAM in linux programs. Only 32bit linux programs run on amd64 so far. Bye, Alexander. -- !07/11 PDP a ni deppart m'I !pleH http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 07:55:09 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C2D16A401; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:55:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mv@thebeastie.org) Received: from p4.roq.com (ns1.ecoms.com [207.44.130.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 608C513C457; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:55:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mv@thebeastie.org) Received: from p4.roq.com (localhost.roq.com [127.0.0.1]) by p4.roq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD2E4CE7C; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:55:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smitch7.jumbuck.com (p82.jumbuck.com [206.112.99.82]) by p4.roq.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041404C9AA; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:55:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smitch7.jumbuck.com (mail.jumbuck.com [206.112.99.82]) by smitch7.jumbuck.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383C7410EAE; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:55:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beaste5.jumbuck.com (melbourne.jumbuck.com [150.101.166.27]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smitch7.jumbuck.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDFFC410D44; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from beaste5.jumbuck.com (beast5 [192.168.46.105]) by beaste5.jumbuck.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A658209D265; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:55:05 +1000 (EST) Received: from beast2.jumbuck.com (unknown [192.168.46.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by beaste5.jumbuck.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A65A209D1CE; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:55:05 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4631AC58.4000000@thebeastie.org> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:55:04 +1000 From: Michael Vince User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.2) Gecko/20070314 SeaMonkey/1.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Leidinger References: <463169CB.8050304@thebeastie.org> <20070427094310.gtvywoy99cccko8g@webmail.leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20070427094310.gtvywoy99cccko8g@webmail.leidinger.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: freebsd-database@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Oracle 10g on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 07:55:09 -0000 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Michael Vince (from Fri, 27 Apr 2007 > 13:11:07 +1000): > >> I have been contemplating buying a high end server and running a lot of >> stuff on it in jails including Oracle 10g under linux emu. >> I would be using Amd64 as the server would have 8gigs of ram or more. > > You will not be able to use this much of RAM in linux programs. Only > 32bit linux programs run on amd64 so far. > The idea behind using Amd64 FreeBSD is just to be able to use a lot of ram for the other regular jails etc. The Linux Oracle would be the 32bit version, Oracle unlike MySQL appears to slice it self up into a lot of smaller sized processes a lot like Postgres. Do you think I would have any issues using it this way? Thanks From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 08:45:11 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE20F16A400; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:45:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from redbull.bpaserver.net (redbullneu.bpaserver.net [213.198.78.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845B313C45E; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:45:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p54A5C65C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.165.198.92]) by redbull.bpaserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0045C2E27C; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:45:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5282A5B4BE0; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:44:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3R8irIs070248; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:44:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:44:53 +0200 Message-ID: <20070427104453.tcwnvp1c944w08s0@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 10:44:53 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Michael Vince References: <463169CB.8050304@thebeastie.org> <20070427094310.gtvywoy99cccko8g@webmail.leidinger.net> <4631AC58.4000000@thebeastie.org> In-Reply-To: <4631AC58.4000000@thebeastie.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.3) / FreeBSD-7.0 X-BPAnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-BPAnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BPAnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-14.864, required 8, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -15.00, DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME 0.00, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14) X-BPAnet-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-Spam-Status: No Cc: freebsd-database@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Oracle 10g on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 08:45:11 -0000 Quoting Michael Vince (from Fri, 27 Apr 2007 =20 17:55:04 +1000): > Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> Quoting Michael Vince (from Fri, 27 Apr 2007 =20 >> 13:11:07 +1000): >> >>> I have been contemplating buying a high end server and running a lot of >>> stuff on it in jails including Oracle 10g under linux emu. >>> I would be using Amd64 as the server would have 8gigs of ram or more. >> >> You will not be able to use this much of RAM in linux programs. =20 >> Only 32bit linux programs run on amd64 so far. >> > The idea behind using Amd64 FreeBSD is just to be able to use a lot of > ram for the other regular jails etc. > The Linux Oracle would be the 32bit version, Oracle unlike MySQL > appears to slice it self up into a lot of smaller sized processes a lot > like Postgres. > Do you think I would have any issues using it this way? No, but linux-aio may be needed for Oracle (not available in -current yet). Bye, Alexander. --=20 Amy: "What about Umbrielle?" Fry: "Well, it turned out I loved her, but I wasn't in love with her." Amy: "Trouble in bed." http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 19:18:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1F816A401 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:18:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netslists@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC1913C48A for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:18:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from netslists@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 71so758981ugh for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 12:18:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=jZejMnl9vfBial1t6zwDGKz0b3sF+BLZibrLjkD4jT7B7IuFVi/2aYvRURadwV0/YsT+mwtv2bENrmngndbwdnfrwxjFt6cL3FJ/yKEsIM/RyyA8E20In9AFPeNMp9lWlwoo3QxAtpimAC1pB/kRvpP9qnAnij3ksoJMUwAqr1A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DuJMo1y4UQQSeYQ5sOa6N+sGs4aqOSm27TjRwsV9v7w9juDxJihktMoXjNg9pPIYaOJ3iOtRxuG3qp/HwcHE3WFTlp9nRLRNmdjQdQ/WlTiuUJyXhwm0+bHH3cimqAWZfQGdLT+FnvrnTDLu738q+wvVvj/kz72/eUj10OeMH3k= Received: by 10.82.155.10 with SMTP id c10mr6369315bue.1177699803157; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:50:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.9.8? ( [91.135.49.10]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z40sm1257629ikz.2007.04.27.11.50.01; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <463245CE.7060104@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:49:50 +0200 From: Sten Daniel Soersdal User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Juergen Lock References: <200704050712.l357Ck5F000488@pluto.hedeland.org> <4614F65D.3010403@freebsd.org> <20070405215754.GA28008@saturn.kn-bremen.de> <461A6431.2030709@freebsd.org> <20070410123604.D35599@kozubik.com> <462379F1.3050008@freebsd.org> <20070416063519.L35599@kozubik.com> <200704191826.l3JIQ7ap061788@saturn.kn-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <200704191826.l3JIQ7ap061788@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bounty and timeline on vmware 5.x on FreeBSD 6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:18:14 -0000 Juergen Lock wrote: > In article <20070416140454.GA79264@uws1.starlofashions.com> scottro@nyc.rr.com > wrote: > >> ... >> My only problems with VirtualBox were in getting it to use bridged >> networking with a wireless connection. I had no problem when it was >> connected by cabled ethernet, but judging from a bit of googling, I'm >> not the only one who couldn't get it working with wireless. >> >> Disclaimer number 2--I'm not at all experienced with bridging in Linux, >> it seems to be a bit different than what I do with FreeBSD, and it could >> easily be a PEBCAK problem. > > Afaik the problem is that bridging causes the source ethernet address of > packets you send to change, and not all wireless nics/drivers support > sending other source ethernet addresses than the nic's own. (This usually > isn't a problem with wired nics...) > In AP mode it should work but in station mode it can't because of 802.11 restrictions. There is something called WDS but it's a poorly documented hack and is not, AFAIK, supported in FreeBSD. -- Sten Daniel Soersdal From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 27 20:20:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1CC16A406 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:20:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (vlk.vlakno.cz [62.168.28.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC6513C45D for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:20:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4468BD34D for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:20:24 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vlk.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id voFMKC31Ra9A for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:20:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A987D8BD316 for ; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:20:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l3RKKNCd095177 for emulation@freebsd.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:20:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:20:23 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070427202023.GA95095@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Subject: [PATCH]: correct futexes X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 20:20:26 -0000 hi its i386 only at the moment but please give it some testing. I want at least two positive reports :) the patch: www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/linux_futex.patch testing program: www.vlakno.cz/~rdivacky/futex.c (you have to cc futex.c -lpthread in your gentoo chroot) please test this patch against normal usage (firefox, skype etc.) I want to be really sure to not break anything this time ;) thnx roman p.s. amd64 version will be around in a few days.. I hope