From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 18 06:48:34 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D340116A418 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 06:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DB513C465 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 06:48:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so1817389fka for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:48:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=34FITcpCCTPbGU85h8QFQg1WaT1853ZXwt4qSmCI0tE=; b=EEVOYC1xjox+qmhEqKXUEkUapTpPejcZFvOYQA3JPa2lzzAaHl7FJ3bDi3IRO/bJCjrljCfuNycH+L+0u0lHpf3fx4GVysl+dPMZT5tb0RVDfbBu5TMMHvvfU1N6pQs4z/dL4o9HvbZtKCOkk2/cS3HmRFouj7qTXiiCGXrEqws= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=k1hpjFMJr1xFXj8fIGyTEuWX6oGX5k1qvyF+2m6rGFzxUM7CXqFbUTGtCMEKYHJmrlWvoS6ScbuSUrdoMARKuV9UGSspPIWvYIMXCLhyrjrNnBrBSBaSeZJgthrKKiBuybkx6IKnA7UvFiM47t0bG6OEIJixDK8o7OLpnZEuABE= Received: by 10.82.106.14 with SMTP id e14mr9937081buc.1195368101527; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:41:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.118.14 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 22:41:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <786602c60711172241o77408e77ld46c5c4541adbc8e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 14:41:41 +0800 From: "Thomas Zander" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <786602c60710260930v2cfbe90bl9d141813c7120e8b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <786602c60710260930v2cfbe90bl9d141813c7120e8b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Here we go again: mplayer 1.0 rc2, please test X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 06:48:34 -0000 Hi, http://www.rrr.de/~riggs/mplayer/m20071118.tar.bz2 includes all the suggestions and fixes I have received so far, including Jung-uk Kim's solution to enable amd64 builds again. Please test and comment. TIA, Riggs From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 18 15:42:49 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D9F16A417 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:42:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hyogeollee@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FED413C465 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:42:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hyogeollee@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u77so5514780pyb for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 07:42:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gJ6zZE6z0ULMoiiH7QzRAuJKEoqmXegfF825aSpU7tM=; b=EiU4UFLOPod75JcHz/Zys+mK3f0JddT5GBa0sDgr9Vjev9n8JpUvEwSHJqRtNKqXGwzN4YP8G+ppmZoZXBN+o6YLODLXmBGTAzqaeyYFQC9sv24nrR+PKY97AJZfCD5MlLFP/+Po1YnyLaE5aZ6eHwkzL2U7XOI3qZooZ7ZgqT4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=UBuzLrqKfTnORPT3I0iq1/LOXb0JfXDDbQucgYdDVoew/8JM2rYAMuvoVy6Y3bvl0mCeZnxh67kR8C1BNEHn49MRc+kM0tHqBQxQB4I5szb4TNFVz1Z8yglE77TUra+b15x0N55iQjPIjLEzPvdUBUuJFEX+7AqPwzkH3bRRL/Q= Received: by 10.64.250.7 with SMTP id x7mr9054722qbh.1195398940359; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 07:15:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ( [220.74.98.143]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm164278nzn.2007.11.18.07.15.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 18 Nov 2007 07:15:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47405711.5040102@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 00:15:29 +0900 From: Hyogeol Lee User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071101) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: 786602c60710260930v2cfbe90bl9d141813c7120e8b@mail.gmail.com X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=EUC-KR Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Here we go again: mplayer 1.0 rc2, please test X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 15:42:49 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi, Works fine on -current/amd64. CFLAGS=-DNDEBUG -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing WITHOUT_DEBUG=yes WITHOUT_RTCPU=yes WITHOUT_MENCODER=yes Best Regards, - -- Hyogeol Lee hyogeollee@gmail.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHQFcQ1D7/GiH6QSERCpQ+AJ0WN2dnOtIvpoxAHS6guEM3TvLkTgCfToau OUe4+9j38KTc+OTaDjUxWwM= =tGyV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 18 20:12:43 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D6A916A41A for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:12:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A940513C468 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:12:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.23] (rb5dg130.net.upc.cz [89.176.238.130]) (authenticated bits=0) by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAIKBs4O036726 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:12:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) From: Pav Lucistnik To: Thomas Zander In-Reply-To: <786602c60711172241o77408e77ld46c5c4541adbc8e@mail.gmail.com> References: <786602c60710260930v2cfbe90bl9d141813c7120e8b@mail.gmail.com> <786602c60711172241o77408e77ld46c5c4541adbc8e@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+gIRJ53A7c4jDyrneMwt" Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:11:54 +0100 Message-Id: <1195416714.85174.17.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Score: -4.079 () AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.62 on 195.250.144.108 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: raven.customer.vol.cz; Sender-ip: 89.176.238.130; Sender-helo: [192.168.0.23]; ) Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Here we go again: mplayer 1.0 rc2, please test X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:12:43 -0000 --=-+gIRJ53A7c4jDyrneMwt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thomas Zander p=ED=B9e v ne 18. 11. 2007 v 14:41 +0800: > http://www.rrr.de/~riggs/mplayer/m20071118.tar.bz2 >=20 > includes all the suggestions and fixes I have received so far, > including Jung-uk Kim's solution to enable amd64 builds again. Looks good here. --=20 Pav Lucistnik KDE is for the techies who feel they can't be productive without being able to control the exact amount of bevel in their window frames in 2% increments. --=-+gIRJ53A7c4jDyrneMwt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBHQJyGntdYP8FOsoIRAlziAJ9zQ8+g6Xvpukbp0CFxSY5rQd2TsACfepJv rXzEAp4skMbswu5p7ZbES1M= =Ac3z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+gIRJ53A7c4jDyrneMwt-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 18 22:53:07 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03BE16A41A; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:53:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@gahr.ch) Received: from cpanel03.rubas-s03.net (cpanel03.rubas-s03.net [195.182.222.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F5D13C4D3; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:53:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@gahr.ch) Received: from 80-218-191-236.dclient.hispeed.ch ([80.218.191.236] helo=gahrtop.localhost) by cpanel03.rubas-s03.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Itt0G-00079z-S6; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 23:52:36 +0100 Message-ID: <4740C229.3000507@gahr.ch> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 23:52:25 +0100 From: Pietro Cerutti User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: infofarmer@FreeBSD.org References: <20071116085143.dd735f37.bsd-unix@embarqmail.com> <473DAA0C.6000804@gahr.ch> <20071116163628.GD97540@amilo.cenkes.org> In-Reply-To: <20071116163628.GD97540@amilo.cenkes.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=9571F78E; url=http://www.gahr.ch/pgp Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE0F4C51918C6B9674AF4F920" X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cpanel03.rubas-s03.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - gahr.ch X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: Randy Pratt , bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, freebsd ports Subject: Re: ports/117266: New port: www/linux-netscape-navigator The All-New Netscape Navigator 9.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:53:07 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE0F4C51918C6B9674AF4F920 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 03:32:44PM +0100, Pietro Cerutti wrote: >> The browser-prefs.js file indeed isn't part of the tarball, but gets >> anyway installed on my system: >> >>> pkg_info -W >> /usr/local/lib/linux-netscape-navigator/defaults/pref/browser-prefs.js= >> /usr/local/lib/linux-netscape-navigator/defaults/pref/browser-prefs.js= >> was installed by package linux-netscape-navigator-9.0.0.3 >> >> The port uses the infrastructure provided by >> /usr/ports/www/linux-seamonkey/Makefile.common, as all other >> "linux-gecko" ports do. I think the cause is to be searched inside tha= t >> file. >=20 > Yep, look at the post-patch target. I can't say if that should be > disabled for netscape until I examine the browser a bit deeper, > but I will. >=20 > In the meantime, could you please provide a complete shar or > tarball of the latest version in any form. Here's the tarball for 9.0.0.3: http://www.gahr.ch/FreeBSD/patches/117266_linux-netscape-navigator-9.0.0.= 3.tar.bz2 >=20 > Thanks! --=20 Pietro Cerutti PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp --------------enigE0F4C51918C6B9674AF4F920 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHQMIuwMJqmJVx944RCt9SAKDF3itQrOi9Tdvs42BjlXb1ViFhZQCgmh7b 8ioiN6vEsQaXL/OP6oWqqXo= =1RPT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE0F4C51918C6B9674AF4F920-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 02:56:57 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4522016A418 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:56:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from cauchy.math.missouri.edu (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8A813C442 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:56:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from laptop2.gateway.2wire.net (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by cauchy.math.missouri.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAJ2ul0R025153 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:56:48 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Message-ID: <4740FB72.5010206@math.missouri.edu> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:56:50 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071107 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports List Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------090900050108000702010709" Subject: stlport X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:56:57 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090900050108000702010709 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I am trying to get the devel/stlport to work on FreeBSD 7.0. A start is to add the line USE_GCC= 3.4 in the appropriate place in the Makefile, but then it becomes clear that some additional change is needed to stlport/config/stl_gcc.h. This file is the most convoluted mess of #if's I have ever seen. The attached patch works on my particular system, but clearly it is a fudge and won't be universal to other situations. Is anyone working on this? If not, would you guys be kind enough to make my patch more proper? Thanks, Stephen --------------090900050108000702010709 Content-Type: text/plain; name="patch-stlport::config::stl_gcc.h" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="patch-stlport::config::stl_gcc.h" --- stlport/config/stl_gcc.h.orig 2003-11-02 02:59:11.000000000 -0600 +++ stlport/config/stl_gcc.h 2007-11-18 20:45:20.000000000 -0600 @@ -7,11 +7,20 @@ # define _STLP_USE_GLIBC #endif +#if !defined(__FreeBSD__) || (defined(__FreeBSD__) && (__FreeBSD_cc_version < 530001)) # define _STLP_NO_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_KEYWORD +#endif + -# if defined(__FreeBSD__) || defined (__hpux) || defined(__amigaos__) || ( defined(__OS2__) && defined(__EMX__) ) +#if defined (__hpux) || defined(__amigaos__) || ( defined(__OS2__) && defined(__EMX__) ) +# define _STLP_NO_WCHAR_T +#elif defined(__FreeBSD__) +# if (__FreeBSD_cc_version < 500005) # define _STLP_NO_WCHAR_T -# endif +# else +# define _STLP_FREEBSD_HAS_WFUNCS +# endif /* __FreeBSD_cc_version < 500005 */ +#endif #ifdef __USLC__ # include @@ -81,7 +90,7 @@ # endif -#if defined (__CYGWIN__) || defined (__MINGW32__) || !(defined (_STLP_USE_GLIBC) || defined (__sun)) +#if defined (__CYGWIN__) || defined (__MINGW32__) || !(defined (_STLP_USE_GLIBC) || defined (_STLP_FREEBSD_HAS_WFUNCS) || defined (__sun)) #ifndef __MINGW32__ # define _STLP_NO_NATIVE_MBSTATE_T 1 #endif @@ -267,12 +276,15 @@ # define _STLP_NATIVE_INCLUDE_PATH ../g++-v3 # define _STLP_NATIVE_OLD_STREAMS_INCLUDE_PATH ../g++-v3/backward # else -# if defined(__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__) && (__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ > 0) +# if defined(__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__) && (__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ > 0) && !defined(__FreeBSD__) # define _STLP_NATIVE_INCLUDE_PATH ../__GNUC__.__GNUC_MINOR__.__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ # define _STLP_NATIVE_OLD_STREAMS_INCLUDE_PATH ../__GNUC__.__GNUC_MINOR__.__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__/backward # else -# define _STLP_NATIVE_INCLUDE_PATH ../__GNUC__.__GNUC_MINOR__ -# define _STLP_NATIVE_OLD_STREAMS_INCLUDE_PATH ../__GNUC__.__GNUC_MINOR__/backward +# define tempi386 i386 +# undef i386 +# define _STLP_NATIVE_INCLUDE_PATH /usr/local/lib/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/3.4.6/include/c++ +# define _STLP_NATIVE_OLD_STREAMS_INCLUDE_PATH /usr/local/lib/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/3.4.6/include/c++ +# define i386 tempi386 # endif # endif @@ -371,6 +383,6 @@ # define _STLP_STATIC_TEMPLATE_DATA 1 # endif - +#define _STLP_NO_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_CLASSES --------------090900050108000702010709-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 03:00:31 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C5A16A468 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:00:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from cauchy.math.missouri.edu (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A97A13C468 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:00:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from laptop2.gateway.2wire.net (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by cauchy.math.missouri.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAJ30JrZ025191 for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:00:20 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Message-ID: <4740FC46.1070405@math.missouri.edu> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:00:22 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071107 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Ports List References: <4740FB72.5010206@math.missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <4740FB72.5010206@math.missouri.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: stlport X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:00:31 -0000 Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > I am trying to get the devel/stlport to work on FreeBSD 7.0. A start is > to add the line > USE_GCC= 3.4 > in the appropriate place in the Makefile, but then it becomes clear that > some additional change is needed to stlport/config/stl_gcc.h. This file > is the most convoluted mess of #if's I have ever seen. The attached > patch works on my particular system, but clearly it is a fudge and won't > be universal to other situations. > > Is anyone working on this? If not, would you guys be kind enough to > make my patch more proper? > > Thanks, > Stephen Just to clarify, the appropriate bits I added were: +# define tempi386 i386 +# undef i386 +# define _STLP_NATIVE_INCLUDE_PATH /usr/local/lib/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/3.4.6/include/c++ +# define _STLP_NATIVE_OLD_STREAMS_INCLUDE_PATH /usr/local/lib/gcc/i386-portbld-freebsd7.0/3.4.6/include/c++ +# define i386 tempi386 and +#define _STLP_NO_MEMBER_TEMPLATE_CLASSES From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 03:05:33 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822F416A417 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:05:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60DEF13C468 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:05:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: (qmail 19014 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2007 01:18:44 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 19 Nov 2007 01:18:44 -0000 Message-ID: <4740E430.9050901@chuckr.org> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:17:36 -0500 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071107 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:05:33 -0000 I was wondering why ports apparently aren't allowed an obvious freedom, that of being able to set themselves to run as daemons. A greate long time past, I seem to remember that there used to be a file /usr/local/etc/rc.local, which (if it existed) would be automatically sourced in at the end of rc.conf. Ports which built daemons were allowed (well, actually, expected) to ask the user if they wished to activate the port, and if so, the port would add a line of the form 'portname_enable="YES"', and this would make your new port operate. Well, it seems from what I see of my new system, that this is no longer the case. I could understand (and approve of) ports not being allowed to modify any /etc/contents, but howcome ports can't use this rather obvious workaround? I'm pretty sure this used to be allowed... and it seems like a good policy to me, from the number of non-technical folks who now run FreeBSD. I just wanted to know why its not anymore. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 03:13:47 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C66016A41B for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from mail5out.barnet.com.au (mail5.barnet.com.au [202.83.178.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A04F13C4D1 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:13:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: by mail5out.barnet.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 315152219D5C; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:13:37 +1100 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <4740FF600000C9100E6A45@BarNet> Received: from mail5auth.barnet.com.au (mail5.barnet.com.au [202.83.178.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail5auth.barnet.com.au", Issuer "*.barnet.com.au" (verified OK)) by mail5.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D76A21B12F7; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:13:36 +1100 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (k7.mavetju.org [10.251.1.18]) by mail5auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C012219D46; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:13:36 +1100 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 15DF71A3; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:13:36 +1100 (EST) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:13:36 +1100 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Chuck Robey Message-ID: <20071119031336.GA73804@k7.mavetju> References: <4740E430.9050901@chuckr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4740E430.9050901@chuckr.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:13:47 -0000 On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 08:17:36PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: > activate the port, and if so, the port would add a line of the form > 'portname_enable="YES"', and this would make your new port operate. > Well, it seems from what I see of my new system, that this is no longer > the case. I could understand (and approve of) ports not being allowed > to modify any /etc/contents, but howcome ports can't use this rather > obvious workaround? I don't recall this behaviour at all, I think you're confused with the messages which ports print at the end of the install-phase which say "Add 'foo_enable="YES"'" to your /etc/rc.conf to enable this port. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 03:42:57 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EED216A4DF for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:42:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com) Received: from QMTA07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.64]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1932613C44B for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:42:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com) Received: from OMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.19]) by QMTA07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ERiL1Y0060QuhwU050Aa00; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:31:13 +0000 Received: from kirby.cyberbotx.com ([68.43.195.82]) by OMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ETXC1Y0061n8LeU0300000; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:31:13 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=bC6HxIIgF2NRi3Bp4L0A:9 a=Ji6vgJ_kbBjji-fwM9IA:7 a=pTrGNaeYR_lIb3SoTt8rxlZO6pEA:4 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=v47ZLdibA2YA:10 Message-ID: <47410380.5080406@cyberbotx.com> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 22:31:12 -0500 From: Naram Qashat User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Robey References: <4740E430.9050901@chuckr.org> In-Reply-To: <4740E430.9050901@chuckr.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:42:57 -0000 Also a good thing to point out is that portupgrade can be configured to automatically start or stop a port's daemon via it's /usr/local/etc/rc.d script, which still relies on having the appropriate line in /etc/rc.conf to tell the rc.d script to run, but it is helpful for upgrading ports which have daemons so they can be shut down and then started again after the upgrade is complete. Naram Qashat Chuck Robey wrote: > I was wondering why ports apparently aren't allowed an obvious freedom, > that of being able to set themselves to run as daemons. A greate long > time past, I seem to remember that there used to be a file > /usr/local/etc/rc.local, which (if it existed) would be automatically > sourced in at the end of rc.conf. Ports which built daemons were > allowed (well, actually, expected) to ask the user if they wished to > activate the port, and if so, the port would add a line of the form > 'portname_enable="YES"', and this would make your new port operate. > Well, it seems from what I see of my new system, that this is no longer > the case. I could understand (and approve of) ports not being allowed > to modify any /etc/contents, but howcome ports can't use this rather > obvious workaround? > > I'm pretty sure this used to be allowed... and it seems like a good > policy to me, from the number of non-technical folks who now run > FreeBSD. I just wanted to know why its not anymore. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 04:13:50 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AAC616A420; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:13:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from cauchy.math.missouri.edu (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5CE13C45D; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:13:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from laptop2.gateway.2wire.net (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by cauchy.math.missouri.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAJ3jCCS025368; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:45:13 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Message-ID: <474106CB.9060700@math.missouri.edu> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:45:15 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071107 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: maho@freeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@freeBSD.org Subject: octave-forge on FreeBSD 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:13:50 -0000 Dear Maho, I noticed that you added lines like: .if ${OSVERSION} >= 700042 .if ${ARCH} == "amd64" || ${ARCH} == "sparc64" BROKEN= Does not compile with GCC 4.2 .endif .endif to the Makefile of math/octave-forge. But it also doesn't build on my i386 FreeBSD 7.0 machine. How about doing something more simple like: .if ${OSVERSION} >= 700042 USE_GCC= 3.4 .endif which works great in my situation. Stephen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 04:49:14 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C53D16A41A for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:49:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maho.nakata@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.189]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69BEA13C457 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:49:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maho.nakata@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so1389727rvb for ; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:49:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:message-id:to:cc:subject:from:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; bh=EKpnmZnIZ7Wyp8qmm5Q3/hVDi+O+S7uehVsyYFC6vCE=; b=QEz14Xo4UiuDDsa+qcu2HxPSiTFpVn8+l+DT9etG9jOyEaR4XO46FCS8G7wWomlYldCcyt4TtaehutXo0PIDImKLAVLgeDS0qwNs7zyxDETV6mB7O1DXMR9ykAioimN1jMygDVS5zAqfWI2j5+U8+zkf45qW9r66FlAIl8Jm5ik= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:message-id:to:cc:subject:from:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=O7irdIoFXJBQiAo3Mr5fl4aSzwf4Rl0qyb0yk6L4g7A1bsQ6UilGrdzJv5fq5EZYZY+ENZUZPvQYQRA39xPFEASjNbd7WPijcHDZOTmzxwvuD5wLOlBWJ+0k/ix4KMfh2FfNBSgFRT7aEnue9P/KYI1+QQuV++k7unt9iEIeGU8= Received: by 10.140.135.20 with SMTP id i20mr1466337rvd.1195446277181; Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:24:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ( [134.160.214.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l31sm7229154rvb.2007.11.18.20.24.33 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 18 Nov 2007 20:24:35 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:24:30 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20071119.132430.232757505.chat95@mac.com> To: stephen@math.missouri.edu, portmgr@FreeBSD.org From: Maho NAKATA In-Reply-To: <474106CB.9060700@math.missouri.edu> References: <474106CB.9060700@math.missouri.edu> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Maho NAKATA Cc: maho@freeBSD.org, ports@freeBSD.org Subject: Re: octave-forge on FreeBSD 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:49:14 -0000 Dear portmgr@ and Stephen Portmgr@: Stephen Montgomery-Smith reported that applying following patch will unbreak for FBSD7. Could you please approve my commit? Index: Makefile =================================================================== RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.19 diff -u -r1.19 Makefile --- Makefile 1 Oct 2007 09:34:23 -0000 1.19 +++ Makefile 19 Nov 2007 04:22:31 -0000 @@ -36,9 +36,7 @@ .include .if ${OSVERSION} >= 700042 -.if ${ARCH} == "amd64" || ${ARCH} == "sparc64" -BROKEN= Does not compile with GCC 4.2 -.endif +USE_GCC= 3.4 .endif GNU_HOST= ${ARCH}-portbld-freebsd${OSREL} cvs diff: Diffing files From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith Subject: octave-forge on FreeBSD 7.0 Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 21:45:15 -0600 Stephen: > I noticed that you added lines like: > > .if ${OSVERSION} >= 700042 > .if ${ARCH} == "amd64" || ${ARCH} == "sparc64" > BROKEN= Does not compile with GCC 4.2 > .endif > .endif No, linimon added :) Revision 1.19: download - view: text, markup, annotated - select for diffs Mon Oct 1 09:34:23 2007 UTC (6 weeks, 6 days ago) by linimon Branches: MAIN CVS tags: HEAD Diff to: previous 1.18: preferred, colored Changes since revision 1.18: +4 -2 lines Mark as broken with gcc4.2 on 64-bit archs. While here, remove obsolete cruft. > to the Makefile of math/octave-forge. But it also doesn't build on my > i386 FreeBSD 7.0 machine. :( > How about doing something more simple like: > > .if ${OSVERSION} >= 700042 > USE_GCC= 3.4 > .endif > > which works great in my situation. Thanks for your report. I ask portmgr@ for commit approval. Thanks, -- Nakata Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 06:29:04 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E61A16A41A for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 06:29:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: from emma.lautre.net (emma.lautre.net [80.67.160.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E03E013C442 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 06:29:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5207511456; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:28:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:28:48 +0100 From: Thierry Thomas To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith Message-ID: <20071119062848.GS57695@graf.pompo.net> Mail-Followup-To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith , FreeBSD Ports List References: <4740FB72.5010206@math.missouri.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4740FB72.5010206@math.missouri.edu> X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc; y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-BETA2 i386 Organization: Kabbale Eros X-PGP: 0xC71405A2 Cc: FreeBSD Ports List Subject: Re: stlport X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 06:29:04 -0000 --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Lun 19 nov 07 =E0 3:56:50 +0100, Stephen Montgomery-Smith =E9crivait=A0: =20 > Is anyone working on this? If not, would you guys be kind enough to=20 > make my patch more proper? I'm working on a patch to upgrade it to the latest STLport-5.1.4 (from ). Regards, --=20 Th. Thomas. --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHQS0gc95pjMcUBaIRAtwVAJsEnIno0MsH7bS206+4sHAI6w5MjgCeLM4U 1d6FctEe66nidaj4I3UDn2A= =da8y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 08:07:30 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A56CB16A417; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:07:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.ipv6.droso.net [IPv6:2001:6c8:6:0:206:5bff:fef8:267d]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F134A13C46A; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:07:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 26FA81CC54; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:07:28 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:07:28 +0100 From: Erwin Lansing To: Maho NAKATA Message-ID: <20071119080727.GF42525@droso.net> Mail-Followup-To: Maho NAKATA , stephen@math.missouri.edu, portmgr@FreeBSD.org, maho@freeBSD.org, ports@freeBSD.org References: <474106CB.9060700@math.missouri.edu> <20071119.132430.232757505.chat95@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="phbq2bkSb+hZnunM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071119.132430.232757505.chat95@mac.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 7.0-BETA2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: maho@freeBSD.org, ports@freeBSD.org, stephen@math.missouri.edu, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: octave-forge on FreeBSD 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:07:30 -0000 --phbq2bkSb+hZnunM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 01:24:30PM +0900, Maho NAKATA wrote: > Dear portmgr@ and Stephen >=20 > Portmgr@: >=20 > Stephen Montgomery-Smith > reported that applying following patch will unbreak > for FBSD7. Could you please approve my commit? >=20 > Index: Makefile > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > RCS file: /home/pcvs/ports/math/octave-forge/Makefile,v > retrieving revision 1.19 > diff -u -r1.19 Makefile > --- Makefile 1 Oct 2007 09:34:23 -0000 1.19 > +++ Makefile 19 Nov 2007 04:22:31 -0000 > @@ -36,9 +36,7 @@ > .include > =20 > .if ${OSVERSION} >=3D 700042 > -.if ${ARCH} =3D=3D "amd64" || ${ARCH} =3D=3D "sparc64" > -BROKEN=3D Does not compile with GCC 4.2 > -.endif > +USE_GCC=3D 3.4 > .endif > =20 > GNU_HOST=3D ${ARCH}-portbld-freebsd${OSREL} > cvs diff: Diffing files >=20 Approved. -erwin --phbq2bkSb+hZnunM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHQUQ/qy9aWxUlaZARAh1SAKDByiHnj1Gm2ZxlK/so3IPUziLTYACgkVoi LX4MTT+5CByJj31ySXydlOo= =S06a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --phbq2bkSb+hZnunM-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 08:43:03 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E9916A41B for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:43:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7734613C469 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:43:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so1333333nfb for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 00:42:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=IVJQ+21BpkUS9PluVsk+WC1RJ8r5Co+rIiPhVNV6qqA=; b=RLgCETiSmx5OSrcpV3dhh3udZ/6ORKXfEE407DAYCFPFwPZIe5cX4bpbK+Fo4bg8ly2zgq+G5UdCUTJnjf988c1GFyHIzyclfExAoLWIY+lDPX9Z19Aiy4o5UUhjZo16QBx87fXu7B5kkV55d7yAT85QxbuH+6c7VE4xUHwdmN0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=LulW+7piGQ2GpFG9fzfVM9oY341n4AooIPc6ApN1Qc265t/lHUHmargqOcXjrG72VXj4ycELDoBOjMGCLV5SaKYIXIPSVkauUx6qfvFyviHj6z8+Pe2RZYJfKEioc4Y0GkEwXYsR7mfYO/l4LZ0wyM4l3WS7BJEUlbgiWPU/x0s= Received: by 10.86.49.13 with SMTP id w13mr4832610fgw.1195461771096; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 00:42:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.3.20 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 00:42:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <790a9fff0711190042x73cd231cqbd643c39be2bd767@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:42:51 -0600 From: "Scot Hetzel" To: "Chuck Robey" In-Reply-To: <20071119031336.GA73804@k7.mavetju> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4740E430.9050901@chuckr.org> <20071119031336.GA73804@k7.mavetju> Cc: FreeBSD-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 08:43:04 -0000 On 11/18/07, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 08:17:36PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: > > activate the port, and if so, the port would add a line of the form > > 'portname_enable="YES"', and this would make your new port operate. > > Well, it seems from what I see of my new system, that this is no longer > > the case. I could understand (and approve of) ports not being allowed > > to modify any /etc/contents, but howcome ports can't use this rather > > obvious workaround? > > I don't recall this behavior at all, I think you're confused with > the messages which ports print at the end of the install-phase which > say "Add 'foo_enable="YES"'" to your /etc/rc.conf to enable this > port. > Edwin is correct that ports never had this behavior when they were converted to the rc_ng startup script style, they always required the system administrator to set the appropriate rc variable in /etc/rc.conf. Before rc_ng some scripts would automatically start on a reboot, while others required copying the *.sh{-dist,-default,...} startup script to one without the extentsion, as well as setting the execute bit. This is probably what you are remembering. Scot From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 11:06:06 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6999616A41B for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:06:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB6D13C4CC for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:06:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAJB66WM039795 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:06:06 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id lAJB65df039791 for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:06:05 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:06:05 GMT Message-Id: <200711191106.lAJB65df039791@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: FreeBSD ports list Cc: Subject: Current unassigned ports problem reports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:06:06 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Bugs can be in one of several states: o - open A problem report has been submitted, no sanity checking performed. a - analyzed The problem is understood and a solution is being sought. f - feedback Further work requires additional information from the originator or the community - possibly confirmation of the effectiveness of a proposed solution. p - patched A patch has been committed, but some issues (MFC and / or confirmation from originator) are still open. r - repocopy The resolution of the problem report is dependent on a repocopy operation within the CVS repository which is awaiting completion. s - suspended The problem is not being worked on, due to lack of information or resources. This is a prime candidate for somebody who is looking for a project to do. If the problem cannot be solved at all, it will be closed, rather than suspended. c - closed A problem report is closed when any changes have been integrated, documented, and tested -- or when fixing the problem is abandoned. Critical problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f ports/117270 [UPDATE] net/asterisk-addons to 1.4.4 1 problem total. Serious problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o ports/106369 vpnd caused kernel panic with ppp mode o ports/106372 vpnd can't run with slip mode f ports/108077 www/linux-flashplugin9 crashes linux-firefox f ports/108413 net/vnc does not works. f ports/112385 sysutils/lookupd on Kernel 64 f ports/112921 x11-wm/Beryl not loading focus and keybinding settings f ports/113144 print/ghostscript-gnu dumps core with several output d f ports/115818 Executable clash between databases/grass and ruby gems f ports/116378 xorg 7.3 on -stable breaks math/scilab f ports/116385 net/vnc using vnc.so crashes Xorg 7.3 when remote comp f ports/116586 net/isc-dhcp3-server does not work when compiled with o ports/116611 devel/p5-gearmand - rename to devel/p5-Gearman-Server f ports/116753 multimedia/MPlayer crashes after playing *.flv on 7.0- f ports/116777 The math/scilab port fails in demos->signal->bode. f ports/116778 security/nmap ping-scan misses some hosts f ports/116949 security/vpnc: Some Cisco Concentrators refuse Connect o ports/117025 multimedia/pwcbsd: Pwcbsd-1.4.0 + New USBStack not wor o ports/117119 new port: emulators/dboxfe, a front-end to DosBox conf f ports/117128 security/ipsec-tools racoon.sh fails with /var on mfs o ports/117144 sysutils/nut : ACL with IPv6 address rejected o ports/117145 [PATCH] math/dislin - update to 9.2 f ports/117196 Port net/asterisk-addons 1.4.2 fails to compile f ports/117686 print/fontforge : extract fails when building with NOP o ports/117689 [update] games/ftjava o ports/117792 new version of sysutils/Kgtk port o ports/117882 mail/prayer needs update f ports/117886 ports: net/nss_ldap 257 size mismatch from source PADL o ports/117942 net/redir: fix core dump on redir f ports/117956 HP LaserJet 1022 not working after upgrade to print/HP o ports/117985 ftp/jftpgw: has incorrect startup script o ports/118031 update net/smb4k to latest version o ports/118072 update databases/slony1 to latest o ports/118077 fix broken port: editors/nvi-devel broken since gcc-4. 33 problems total. Non-critical problems S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f ports/101166 bittorrent-curses only works under English locales. o ports/107354 net/icmpinfo: icmpinfo -vvv does not recocnize any ICM a ports/107447 [patch] devel/sdl12 - Add devel/directfb support f ports/107937 jailed net/isc-dhcp3-server wouldn't run with an immut f ports/111399 print/ghostscript-gpl: ghostscript-gpl WITH_FT_BRIDGE f ports/111456 [UPDATE] finance/pfpro updated distinfo f ports/112887 net/nxserver 1.4.0_1 fails to compile after upgrading f ports/113423 Update for ports net/freenx to version 0.6.0 f ports/114127 net/vnc - vnc.so installed to bad location f ports/114825 pam module security/pam_abl not working s ports/115216 ADA devel/florist exit_process program doesn't compile s ports/115217 Ada devel/florist socket program doesn't compile due t f ports/115304 multimedia/gpac-mp4box cannot import files larger than f ports/115336 port multimedia/avifile on FreeBSD 7.0 not BROKEN with f ports/115401 Update port: graphics/ipe Version 6.0pre28 of Ipe that f ports/115627 www/Lynx (-ssl) does not correctly test for OpenSSL o ports/115654 [UPDATE] devel/sdl12 to 1.2.12 o ports/115656 [UPDATE] graphics/sdl_ttf to 2.0.9 o ports/115657 [UPDATE] net/sdl_net to 1.2.7 o ports/115658 [UPDATE] audio/sdl_mixer to 1.2.8 o ports/115660 [UPDATE] graphics/sdl_image to 1.2.6 f ports/116037 multimedia/dvd-slideshow has been updated from 0.7.5 t f ports/116058 Update: x11-themes/gtk-qt-engine to version 0.8 f ports/116120 [patch] x11-toolkits/gtkdatabox2: update to 0.7.0.1 f ports/116142 devel/cvsweb3 coloured side-by-side stopped working wh f ports/116226 x11-wm/compiz - emerald and compiz-fusion and scim are o ports/116274 New port: lang/nbc NBC is a programming language for t f ports/116323 net-im/jabber-users-agent bugs f ports/116333 math/isabelle fails to build with SML/NJ; requires bas f ports/116422 [patch] devel/kdbg: fix to allow a core file to be ope f ports/116454 net/unison: should depend on X11-enabled ocaml when bu o ports/116485 games/vultures-eye gets a permission denied after typi f ports/116495 [patch] Adding a banch of semi-official patches to x11 f ports/116567 [PATCH] net/vnc: [SUMMARIZE CHANGES] o ports/116683 [NEW PORT] audio/kirocker: KDE Kicker applet for Amaro f ports/116783 databases/db46 can not be built o ports/116817 New port: devel/libreadline-java a JNI-wrapper around o ports/116829 New port: net/isc-dhcp31-(client|devel|relay|server) o ports/116948 [NEW PORT] mail/smfsav: Sendmail Sender Address Valida f ports/116974 net-p2p/azureus fails to operate correctly if IPV6 sup o ports/117003 [MAINTAINER] www/abyssws - Some fixes o ports/117031 multimedia/fxtv: fails in the start in i810e set to 16 o ports/117047 [NEW PORT] sysutils/ispman: ISP management software o ports/117078 [PATCH]: www/* COMMENT, BROKEN, RESTRICTED, NO_PACKAGE f ports/117085 [PATCH] devel/cvs2svn: request update to 2.0.1 f ports/117101 mail/perdition: add rc.d scripts o ports/117115 www/apache-jserv: [PATCH]: portlint cleanups o ports/117122 [NEW PORT] security/phpdeadlock: Web-based user authen f ports/117164 [PATCH] sysutils/fusefs-wdfs: update to 1.4.2 f ports/117173 graphics/opencv does not compile if ffmpeg option is c o ports/117193 update devel/sdl12 to version 1.2.12 o ports/117218 [patch] audio/sdl_mixer : timidity++ support o ports/117221 update of games/eduke32 f ports/117223 Typo in ports-mgmt/bpm descr f ports/117225 [PATCH] net-p2p/gtkhx: Not BROKEN with GCC 4.2 o ports/117236 New port: x11/xcb-util A module with libxcb/libX11 ext o ports/117249 cannot make deskutils/krss o ports/117253 graphics/xfig and xfig-devel no longer find ghostscrip f ports/117262 [net/freeradius] rc.d script bug o ports/117276 New port: security/sqlninja a Sql Server penetration t f ports/117288 [PATCH] x11-wm/compiz: Add in KDE support, clean up pk o ports/117290 New port: archivers/unrar-iconv Extract, view & test R f ports/117298 port (/usr/ports/russian/xneur) update needed o ports/117299 [NEW PORTS] www/webobjects(+) Apple WebObjects ports b o ports/117311 [new port] devel/p5-SNMP-Persist o ports/117312 New port: x11-fonts/ttf-bengali-fonts - Free TrueType o ports/117324 ports devel/sourcenav can't build o ports/117327 devel/devhelp doesn't build with seamonkey f ports/117360 [PATCH]multimedia/gxine: respect CFLAGS o ports/117413 New port: multimedia/gpodder - a GTK2 podcast aggrega o ports/117431 Update port: graphics/ipe Version 6.0pre28 of Ipe that o ports/117438 x11-wm/vtwm: recent changes break make index, make des o ports/117457 [MAINTAINER] emulators/dynamips-devel: new release can o ports/117475 [maintainer update] updated net/asterisk-app-notify th o ports/117480 New Port: devel/dev86 -- 8086 Development Tools f ports/117487 [PATCH] net-mgmt/rancid-devel: [SUMMARIZE CHANGES] o ports/117489 [NEW PORTS] multimedia/p5-FFmpeg-Command o ports/117509 [new port] mail/vmailmgr -- A powerful, clean and easy f ports/117518 [PATCH] misc/ipbt - fix BROKEN size mismatch in distin o ports/117519 [maintainer update] lang/sbcl: update to 1.0.11 o ports/117521 [new port] net/asterisk-res-bonjour Bonjour (Zeroconf) o ports/117523 Update port: net/empty - Update from 0.6.9b to current o ports/117533 [maintainer-update][sysutils/bsdadminscripts] latest r o ports/117534 [PATCH]: net-mgmt/netdisco 0.95 patch o ports/117544 [NEW PORT] audio/gnormalize, a Gtk2 frontend to normal o ports/117550 [MAINTAINER] devel/doxygen: update to 1.5.3 o ports/117563 Maintainer update: net/unison minor fixes o ports/117588 New Ports: linux-nerodigitalaudio o ports/117597 [NEW PORT] sysutils/arcconf: Adaptec SCSI RAID adminis o ports/117600 maintainer update: math/liborigin o ports/117608 [Maintainer-update]: devel/sdl12 version update to 1.2 o ports/117609 [Maintainer-update] audio/sdl_mixer version update to o ports/117610 [Maintainer-update] graphics/sdl_image version update o ports/117611 [Maintainer-update]: graphics/sdl_ttf version update t o ports/117612 [Maintainer-Update] graphics/sdl_gfx maintainer overta o ports/117615 New port: devel/tijmp (A simple memory profiler for Ja o ports/117644 New Port: audio/taglookup Tags groups of audio files u o ports/117658 Update port: security/xca o ports/117667 [MAINTAINER] x11-wm/xmonad: [SUMMARIZE CHANGES] o ports/117678 [MAINTAINER] print/fontforge: Mark as BROKEN on amd64 f ports/117680 maintainer update of lang/g95 to latest snapshot o ports/117683 climm should provide an optional dependency on gloox o ports/117703 New port: devel/asdlgen generate serializers for C,C++ o ports/117713 Update port: biology/clustalw to 2.0 o ports/117715 [MAINTAINER] textproc/metauml: add a manual and exampl o ports/117721 Update port: textproc/sml-fxp (minor fix) o ports/117740 Update port math/dislin to 9.2 o ports/117761 [PATCH] upgrade of security/ossec-hids-local 1.3 -> 1. o ports/117762 [PATCH]: upgrade of security/ossec-hids-client 1.3 -> o ports/117763 [PATCH]: upgrade of security/ossec-hids-server 1.3 -> o ports/117767 Update port: net-im/openfire update to new version - o o ports/117769 [MAINTAINER] korean/libhangul : update to 0.0.6 o ports/117782 New port: ports-mgmt/pkg_cleanup pkg_rmleaves clone wi f ports/117785 update to ports-mgmt/pkgsearch f ports/117793 [PATCH] sysutils/eroaster - replaced deprecated whrand o ports/117797 [Maintainer-update]: net/sdl_net version update to 1.2 o ports/117806 [update] devel/ta-lib 0.4.0_1 f ports/117809 textproc/qstardict: chase gnome DATADIR move o ports/117814 conflict: graphics/sdl_ttf and x11-fonts/showfont o ports/117816 New port: sysutils/ciso A tool to compress ISO images o ports/117840 [patch] mail/dbmail: update to 2.2.7 o ports/117848 [patch] sysutils/areca-cli periodic script o ports/117853 [Maintainer Update] textproc/permute update WWW in p o ports/117872 new port addition: devel/Testing_Selenium o ports/117878 print/ghostscript-gnu and print/ghostscript-gpl lacks o ports/117880 [maintainer update] sysutils/monit 4.10.1 o ports/117885 Update net/iaxmodem to 0.3.2 o ports/117887 www/adzap : make it also install zapchain, to chain re o ports/117888 [maintainer-update] science/gwyddion: update to 2.9 f ports/117897 [PATCH] net-im/amsn configure script broken f ports/117900 x11-wm/pekwm ports needs to be updated o ports/117901 lang/p5-Error: [PATCH]: portlint cleanups, claim maint o ports/117902 devel/newt: [PATCH]: portlint cleanups, claim maintain o ports/117912 [patch] chinese/hanzim: Fix segmentation fault caused o ports/117927 [MAINTAINER] emulators/dynamips-devel: Error into DEPE o ports/117939 Update port: net/csocks to version 1.1 o ports/117945 New port: sysutils/metamorphose-1.1 Metamorphose flexi o ports/117949 [PATCH] sysutils/kldfind: update to 0.61 f ports/117957 security/swatch can't stop (doesn't match pid with pro f ports/117959 [PATCH] net-p2p/limewire: fix broken checksum; update o ports/117967 [maintainer] [patch] security/openvpn-auth-ldap no lon o ports/117983 [MAINTAINER] print/fontforge: update to 20071110 o ports/117994 New port: misc/pauker Flashcard learning program o ports/117997 Cleanups to the cad/spice port o ports/118000 [UPDATE] www/mod_fastcgi to 2.4.4 o ports/118003 www/apache22: with PgSQL option require only libpq.so. o ports/118012 [PATCH] Update deskutils/calcurse to version 1.9 f ports/118018 Core Dump with dns/noip Port o ports/118022 [MAINTAINER] [PATCH] Update comms/o2sms from 3.26 to 3 f ports/118032 [update] comms/spandsp-devel 0.0.4.p15 o ports/118033 [new port] devel/cvs-devel 1.12.13_8 o ports/118040 Update port: net/siproxd to 0.6.0 o ports/118045 [PATCH] mail/smc-milter: unBREAK, update to 1.9, take o ports/118050 x11/gnome2 - pkg_add -r gnome2 does not work o ports/118055 maintainer update: emulators/qtemu f ports/118065 Non-correct install man for security/sshguard-ipfw o ports/118082 [PATCH] chinese/cce broken in 7.x f ports/118092 Installing mail/dbmail breaks installation of mail/mai f ports/118095 update ports-mgmt/pkgsearch to 1.0.4 f ports/118096 [PATCH]www/lynx: SSL linking problems f ports/118101 typo in www/mod_authz_unixgroup o ports/118102 [MAINTAINER UPDATE] Update misc/fortune-mod-the-godfat o ports/118103 New port: databases/couchdb A document database server f ports/118105 mail/spamd - spamd-setup with multiple files in spamd- f ports/118112 [PATCH] sysutils/fusefs-kmod: use SRC_BASE o ports/118116 [NEW PORT] print/latex-prettyref: Improved reference f o ports/118119 [devel/antlrworks]: upgrade to version 1.1.4 167 problems total. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 12:37:21 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from sup-afu.wrk.terra.com.br (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F86F16A419; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:37:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mnag@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <47418380.5020606@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:37:20 -0200 From: Marcus Alves Grando Organization: FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oliver Schonrock References: <474181E7.4070800@realtsp.com> In-Reply-To: <474181E7.4070800@realtsp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: pecl-APC-3.0.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:37:21 -0000 Ok. I'll update after ports freeze. Regards Oliver Schonrock wrote: > Hi > > Hopefully a useful reminder... > > http://pecl.php.net/package/APC/3.0.15 > > has been out for a couple of months and contains significant bug fixes > over 3.0.14. > > I have hacked the current port with the following: > > root@mission# diff -u distinfo distinfo.orig > --- distinfo Mon Nov 19 12:15:00 2007 > +++ distinfo.orig Mon Nov 19 12:14:09 2007 > @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ > -MD5 (PECL/APC-3.0.15.tgz) = fa15eac040221728f3aaeaf9595de6e1 > -SHA256 (PECL/APC-3.0.15.tgz) = > 1c475a84d12db2a45f1489a48f375d77854ae2c1d6626db3e812ccc04461911a > -SIZE (PECL/APC-3.0.15.tgz) = 112056 > +MD5 (PECL/APC-3.0.14.tgz) = 0f452f936239b6107d3e2e5cda4f4bda > +SHA256 (PECL/APC-3.0.14.tgz) = > f05195d163983a8f36336e622e6008bfecd4643d7c5613a6e4a8b07ed735e050 > +SIZE (PECL/APC-3.0.14.tgz) = 108511 > > > root@mission# diff -u Makefile Makefile.orig > --- Makefile Mon Nov 19 12:15:21 2007 > +++ Makefile.orig Mon Nov 19 12:15:18 2007 > @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ > # > > PORTNAME= APC > -DISTVERSION= 3.0.15 > +DISTVERSION= 3.0.14 > CATEGORIES= www > MASTER_SITES= http://pecl.php.net/get/ > PKGNAMEPREFIX= pecl- > > > and it seems to compile, install and run just fine on a heavily loaded > production machine. > > If you could update the port, that would really help us roll this out. > > Thanks > > Oliver > -- Marcus Alves Grando marcus(at)sbh.eng.br | Personal mnag(at)FreeBSD.org | FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 12:48:00 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06CE916A46D for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:48:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver@realtsp.com) Received: from piha.realtsp.com (piha.realtsp.com [83.138.152.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BDD13C48E for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:47:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver@realtsp.com) Received: by piha.realtsp.com (Postfix, from userid 58) id 85BCC1E8DE8; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:30:28 +0000 (GMT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on piha.realtsp.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL, RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.1 Received: from [192.168.0.153] (ip-87-86-250-33.easynet.co.uk [87.86.250.33]) by piha.realtsp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84721E8DEE; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:30:26 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <474181E7.4070800@realtsp.com> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:30:31 +0000 From: Oliver Schonrock User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mnag@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Status: No X-Virus-Checker-Version: clamassassin 1.2.4 with clamdscan / ClamAV 0.91.1/4840/Mon Nov 19 03:50:46 2007 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: pecl-APC-3.0.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:48:00 -0000 Hi Hopefully a useful reminder... http://pecl.php.net/package/APC/3.0.15 has been out for a couple of months and contains significant bug fixes over 3.0.14. I have hacked the current port with the following: root@mission# diff -u distinfo distinfo.orig --- distinfo Mon Nov 19 12:15:00 2007 +++ distinfo.orig Mon Nov 19 12:14:09 2007 @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ -MD5 (PECL/APC-3.0.15.tgz) = fa15eac040221728f3aaeaf9595de6e1 -SHA256 (PECL/APC-3.0.15.tgz) = 1c475a84d12db2a45f1489a48f375d77854ae2c1d6626db3e812ccc04461911a -SIZE (PECL/APC-3.0.15.tgz) = 112056 +MD5 (PECL/APC-3.0.14.tgz) = 0f452f936239b6107d3e2e5cda4f4bda +SHA256 (PECL/APC-3.0.14.tgz) = f05195d163983a8f36336e622e6008bfecd4643d7c5613a6e4a8b07ed735e050 +SIZE (PECL/APC-3.0.14.tgz) = 108511 root@mission# diff -u Makefile Makefile.orig --- Makefile Mon Nov 19 12:15:21 2007 +++ Makefile.orig Mon Nov 19 12:15:18 2007 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ # PORTNAME= APC -DISTVERSION= 3.0.15 +DISTVERSION= 3.0.14 CATEGORIES= www MASTER_SITES= http://pecl.php.net/get/ PKGNAMEPREFIX= pecl- and it seems to compile, install and run just fine on a heavily loaded production machine. If you could update the port, that would really help us roll this out. Thanks Oliver From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 13:14:51 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8587316A46B for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:14:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com) Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.184]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAAF813C4BE for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:14:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com) Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b27so2292874fka for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:14:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=J2/aa9bV2dZ9S8YHC60OBvoOvoFGhG3Vuwh7gucA2WM=; b=c/Os+sMNFktVUzi4GFu3CuHBmRAy/1C1WhwqO9j+dz3/1LVjn5lhzKmABKFa23D832ojAl3Y9zS29uMs49Z7y8Or8hwzvTYTyzM4yr226kk8P6Uujb69aD/0uERB9iwAH+3ZDZcdW2FHTJx8S6O0cCInqVhCgVk6cWfUlsW50OI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BbDBz1ZGxh3Twrfhrm8evOd3IvbQbB1b/5/oZVsuoG59hhwdSAZ4jqN3ITUQbxuan+p35F3dUeZOsGewHdBVIQPGT5pwnFZXEUknPdue9SaSIcrTSdj/5RNJZDvnryXQhBaw2efCDFPqavIkVjsieBmvThHuhZoq9FPh7CaMBB0= Received: by 10.82.177.3 with SMTP id z3mr13801790bue.1195478080543; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:14:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.118.14 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:14:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <786602c60711190514h5f1430f3ndc57c9ff12c97822@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:14:40 +0900 From: "Thomas Zander" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <786602c60710260930v2cfbe90bl9d141813c7120e8b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <786602c60710260930v2cfbe90bl9d141813c7120e8b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Here we go again: mplayer 1.0 rc2, please test X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:14:51 -0000 And another one, http://www.rrr.de/~riggs/mplayer/m20071119.tar.bz2 is mostly identical to yesterday's version, but contains Eugene's patch to enable AMR audio codec support. I believe we can send-pr this version unless nobody discovers showstoppers. Riggs From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 13:16:14 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A48E16A480 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:16:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bubblereading@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFA413C44B for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:16:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bubblereading@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so357182anc for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:16:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type; bh=IxJQOQRYccOv6ucaEWUoHehb9ayyKOzmPNkoBJwSeoQ=; b=PcFkPMdt91BxlskxmoLIoJse/5fcrUXPj0zi4A3PzwpBjX7GwfoPO8RLOuuP2eRL/wBSPowtf5IN7+grngwbAWmUU3SNyCH4css/1KVGAabu5lhpj192UvIdLWG/L2PzTBnnke1Ecy6fm/z/1/JbC4uvn5NFoBjd1mC8by1vEAU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type; b=YMBdyksT+DVFsjTGaDjzYkyvTe0HD7x+mjOTfC8r4f4hI6dvMjV+uu5zA84rjSDVorLDjCnnYkuaqVPZzWN9ZORNyOmGkVhH8wtWB7nLy2CVSbrt08dE7fDbt/MeGQNDtBpGyBVdK5gylC4NuSbJiRxY86O6SK29v7PHOkKPLDo= Received: by 10.142.148.7 with SMTP id v7mr1003439wfd.1195476469757; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:47:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.238.21 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:47:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:47:49 +0000 From: "Bubble Reading" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: bubblereading@gmail.com Subject: Porting Linux Kernel modules to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 13:16:14 -0000 Hi, Are there good documents/websites which discuss about porting kernel level software from Linux to FreeBSD ? On the other note, Linux has a type called "wait_queue_head_t". How do I port this stuff on FreeBSD ? What is the equivalent ? -- Regards, Bubble From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 14:11:16 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E1716A41A for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0437F13C45D for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:11:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from r.c.ladan@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so2100703waf for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 06:11:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=aSofrviDRPf8GMjAvavs8NjUTZmP5D6iebsoyDMHHBY=; b=UYbuPEU16Rt8we+1QPse2tPD1KPXUrcKUBX/kEnlVHQZWhBzcOb+wHL5OQwcvLQrJBxOSvkLY5RG3wqPnJTssrvLnmT65N5R6srsGDGnenAZr3Jc1OzN/++G9bxOMSyEJZnWUJbhph/emjZ6+OYKGpV6f5NJsjndNHroyWyOrEs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=SagNCQZ+9IwaxwD/Ukg0dv27Urd1c1IX/ecbdE4tKqqI6F3ff7k4hUyp5kNQTZ8A+qsF5rSYS6xV+vxV8HATfd2ONUZWUu/gBakkf2QkNTN8XN7d+rhNOAhTOHnAdrZKu4gEY56Mh9qJO6IZPG/K92TNiYC8EY9mYVFVCjIcVSg= Received: by 10.114.154.1 with SMTP id b1mr720367wae.1195480021780; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:47:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.110.16 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 05:47:01 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:47:01 +0100 From: "Rene Ladan" To: "Bubble Reading" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Porting Linux Kernel modules to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:11:16 -0000 2007/11/19, Bubble Reading : > Hi, > > Are there good documents/websites which discuss about porting kernel level > software from Linux to FreeBSD ? > > On the other note, Linux has a type called "wait_queue_head_t". How do I > port this stuff on FreeBSD ? What is the equivalent ? > There is a devel/linux-kmod-compat port which provides the base layer for multimedia/linux-ov511-kmod and multimedia/linux-gspca-kmod (both are webcam drivers). Maybe that helps. Regards, Rene -- GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 (subkeys.pgp.net) "It won't fit on the line." -- me, 2001 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 15:09:51 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D668F16A41A for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:09:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bubblereading@gmail.com) Received: from el-out-1112.google.com (el-out-1112.google.com [209.85.162.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C79F13C442 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:09:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bubblereading@gmail.com) Received: by el-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id s27so593501ele for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:09:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=mzFUXTf0P0DvHaY/B5MqjaJ440a2ELzog4M954xYL6E=; b=Fr6VuJkulZjqiurQjLIySScNiDUUUNKrroj9Nc9OZI2PrXfTejQnjRRFtfNTc9w02dVjmcuM4/sB0eT8bkHL0ACRqfEFYME0chynvXOHfFEpT2fF3EzOLPHuoQJedWN4NpmXhWQfER2yWCDvZVqozlOHXYSabI4bWlUjznUEdLw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=DHwIFOR6ejesczA057tjI8kENqc3AZsuwF0QAixIZF8kCB/lMH8c0PvxIEoJQKmskDT8dK/2szqTVlKHs7XafiN6NRn16XyotGqwowVLR9EoivfcZQKxNY63kMS0byt/YyPp6Bcl7X5cqH8YcYuAP9euQlCPpTLmjfeht8lhB6Y= Received: by 10.142.126.17 with SMTP id y17mr1090195wfc.1195484976095; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:09:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.238.21 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:09:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:09:35 +0000 From: "Bubble Reading" To: "Rene Ladan" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Porting Linux Kernel modules to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:09:52 -0000 Hi! Thanks. Any other ideas ? I could not get much help from that port as I am using FreeBSD v6.2.0. On 11/19/07, Rene Ladan wrote: > > 2007/11/19, Bubble Reading : > > Hi, > > > > Are there good documents/websites which discuss about porting kernel > level > > software from Linux to FreeBSD ? > > > > On the other note, Linux has a type called "wait_queue_head_t". How do I > > port this stuff on FreeBSD ? What is the equivalent ? > > > There is a devel/linux-kmod-compat port which provides the base layer > for multimedia/linux-ov511-kmod and multimedia/linux-gspca-kmod (both > are webcam drivers). > > Maybe that helps. > > Regards, > Rene > -- > GPG fingerprint = E738 5471 D185 7013 0EE0 4FC8 3C1D 6F83 12E1 84F6 > (subkeys.pgp.net) > > "It won't fit on the line." > -- me, 2001 > -- Regards, Bubble From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 17:27:44 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B0B16A418 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:27:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8471113C47E for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:27:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IuAP1-0004jI-2a for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:27:19 +0000 Received: from 78-1-101-166.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([78.1.101.166]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:27:19 +0000 Received: from ivoras by 78-1-101-166.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:27:19 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:26:54 +0100 Lines: 43 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB32456A1C92AA9BA90DFAE83" X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 78-1-101-166.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Sender: news Subject: Re: Porting Linux Kernel modules to FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:27:44 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB32456A1C92AA9BA90DFAE83 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Bubble Reading wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Are there good documents/websites which discuss about porting kernel le= vel > software from Linux to FreeBSD ? This mailing list is about porting user-level applications, you might have better luck with the hackers@ and current@ mailing lists as they are both much more kernel-oriented. > On the other note, Linux has a type called "wait_queue_head_t". How do = I > port this stuff on FreeBSD ? What is the equivalent ? I don't know the Linux KPI but by the sound if it, some of these pointers might help you: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=3Dtaskqueue http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=3Dcallout http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=3Dqueue --------------enigB32456A1C92AA9BA90DFAE83 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHQcdjldnAQVacBcgRAkj0AJ0fTAITtWYqAyEdUFh6AQWYiVmpMgCffJGb 2g+eGlViLSrZW/c2QKC8WHI= =7Q64 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB32456A1C92AA9BA90DFAE83-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 18:42:36 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43F7616A41A for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:42:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from user-7164946.91b0cf-1@xing.com) Received: from mail.openbc.com (mail.openbc.com [213.238.59.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E364713C481 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:42:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from user-7164946.91b0cf-1@xing.com) Received: by obc-crn42-1.rz.epublica.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 834154465; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:44:31 +0100 (CET) From: "=?UTF-8?Q?MUSTAFA_MESUT_NEB=c4=b0O=c4=9eLU?=" To: "" X-UBounce: U2FsdGVkX1_ur1cROA3kormvyu8J616reeT8LWEDkj9G5Q-xqy6xDw|1 X-UBounceID: 13745620.8e14ca MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <20071119174431.834154465@obc-crn42-1.rz.epublica.de> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:44:31 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: =?utf-8?b?WElORyBhxJ/EsW1hIGRhdmV0?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?UTF-8?Q?MUSTAFA_MESUT_NEB=c4=b0O=c4=9eLU?= List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 18:42:36 -0000 Merhaba, Sizi XING çevreme davet etmek isterim! Kararlar sözkonusu olduÄŸunda iliÅŸkiler gittikçe daha çok önem kazanıyor. XING üzerinden iliÅŸkileri güncel tutmak, geliÅŸtirmek ve onlardan yararlanmak çok kolay. Ä°liÅŸkilerim arasında sizi de görebilirsem memnun olurum. Candan selamlar MUSTAFA MESUT NEBÄ°OÄžLU ----------------------------------------------------------------------- MUSTAFA MESUT NEBÄ°OÄžLU sizi XING platformundaki ağına davet ediyor: http://www.xing.com/go/inv/13745620.e3f898 Artık XING davetiyesi almak istemiyorum: http://www.xing.com/go/opt_out_invite/U2FsdGVkX1-BpW59uwIFFcLiZ5plJ5nQMriJ_jHhECupTZtWJO5I3Q From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 19:30:08 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12C716A418 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BC213C4C4 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:30:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: (qmail 14306 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2007 19:29:43 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 19 Nov 2007 19:29:43 -0000 Message-ID: <4741E3E3.7060808@chuckr.org> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:28:35 -0500 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071107 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Naram Qashat References: <4740E430.9050901@chuckr.org> <47410380.5080406@cyberbotx.com> In-Reply-To: <47410380.5080406@cyberbotx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:30:09 -0000 Naram Qashat wrote: > Also a good thing to point out is that portupgrade can be configured to > automatically start or stop a port's daemon via it's /usr/local/etc/rc.d > script, which still relies on having the appropriate line in > /etc/rc.conf to tell the rc.d script to run, but it is helpful for > upgrading ports which have daemons so they can be shut down and then > started again after the upgrade is complete. Not sure I understand what you mean here. I *think* I remember that ports (quoite a while back) did not require any patching of rc.conf at all, just coding in /usr/local/etc/rc.d. Nowadays, there are required lines in rc.conf which fire sections of rc.d, but apparently (and i do approve of this) the /etc/rc.conf can't be touched. I guess I don't understand why not have the entire startup code in rc.d, and merely have rc source in rc.d after it's finished with rc.conf. I just took a good long look at portupgrade, I didn't see any option like you're talking about. You understand, there is no reason that ports couldn't do what I'm asking about. They aren't written to do this (at least, several different daemon-ports that I've installed all required manual patching of rc.conf). This isn't just my own interpretation, because the ports themselves hint to the user that they should patch rc.conf to get the port working as a daemon. I'm just saying that ports should be written to handle this themselves, and not to require manual patching to get this done. One reason would be users (non-technical ones) who install a particular port as a dependency, and thus never even see the comments about what they should do to get things working. I can't see any reason NOT to do this, and good reason why it should be done. > > Naram Qashat > > Chuck Robey wrote: >> I was wondering why ports apparently aren't allowed an obvious >> freedom, that of being able to set themselves to run as daemons. A >> greate long time past, I seem to remember that there used to be a file >> /usr/local/etc/rc.local, which (if it existed) would be automatically >> sourced in at the end of rc.conf. Ports which built daemons were >> allowed (well, actually, expected) to ask the user if they wished to >> activate the port, and if so, the port would add a line of the form >> 'portname_enable="YES"', and this would make your new port operate. >> Well, it seems from what I see of my new system, that this is no >> longer the case. I could understand (and approve of) ports not being >> allowed to modify any /etc/contents, but howcome ports can't use this >> rather obvious workaround? >> >> I'm pretty sure this used to be allowed... and it seems like a good >> policy to me, from the number of non-technical folks who now run >> FreeBSD. I just wanted to know why its not anymore. >> __ _____________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 19:52:13 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228EA16A479 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:52:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com) Received: from QMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC23F13C50C for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:52:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberbotx@cyberbotx.com) Received: from OMTA07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.59]) by QMTA04.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Ejku1Y00H1GhbT80501500; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:52:07 +0000 Received: from kirby.cyberbotx.com ([68.43.195.82]) by OMTA07.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Ejs71Y0041n8LeU0300000; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:52:08 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=coWKlWSQloeTpIBH7P4A:9 a=7INtfk6dSSSCEpcsJmsA:7 a=jVI0jaAU0q-Gwq_ELQXfAt-e0c8A:4 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=5WZzfXpOq_gA:10 Message-ID: <4741E966.1090601@cyberbotx.com> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:52:06 -0500 From: Naram Qashat User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chuck Robey References: <4740E430.9050901@chuckr.org> <47410380.5080406@cyberbotx.com> <4741E3E3.7060808@chuckr.org> In-Reply-To: <4741E3E3.7060808@chuckr.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:52:13 -0000 In the pkgtools.conf file that portupgrade installs, there's two sections, BEFOREINSTALL and AFTERINSTALL. In BEFOREINSTALL, you could put the following in to make it try to stop the service if there's an rc script for the port: '*' => proc { |origin| cmd_stop_rc(origin) } And almost the same thing for AFTERINSTALL, except cmd_start_rc instead of cmd_stop_rc. And as long as the line for that service is in /etc/rc.conf, it'll start or stop via the rc script. It even says that in the comments of pkgtools.conf. Naram Qashat Chuck Robey wrote: > Naram Qashat wrote: >> Also a good thing to point out is that portupgrade can be configured >> to automatically start or stop a port's daemon via it's >> /usr/local/etc/rc.d script, which still relies on having the >> appropriate line in /etc/rc.conf to tell the rc.d script to run, but >> it is helpful for upgrading ports which have daemons so they can be >> shut down and then started again after the upgrade is complete. > > Not sure I understand what you mean here. I *think* I remember that > ports (quoite a while back) did not require any patching of rc.conf at > all, just coding in /usr/local/etc/rc.d. Nowadays, there are required > lines in rc.conf which fire sections of rc.d, but apparently (and i do > approve of this) the /etc/rc.conf can't be touched. I guess I don't > understand why not have the entire startup code in rc.d, and merely have > rc source in rc.d after it's finished with rc.conf. > > I just took a good long look at portupgrade, I didn't see any option > like you're talking about. You understand, there is no reason that > ports couldn't do what I'm asking about. They aren't written to do this > (at least, several different daemon-ports that I've installed all > required manual patching of rc.conf). This isn't just my own > interpretation, because the ports themselves hint to the user that they > should patch rc.conf to get the port working as a daemon. > > I'm just saying that ports should be written to handle this themselves, > and not to require manual patching to get this done. One reason would > be users (non-technical ones) who install a particular port as a > dependency, and thus never even see the comments about what they should > do to get things working. I can't see any reason NOT to do this, and > good reason why it should be done. > >> >> Naram Qashat >> >> Chuck Robey wrote: >>> I was wondering why ports apparently aren't allowed an obvious >>> freedom, that of being able to set themselves to run as daemons. A >>> greate long time past, I seem to remember that there used to be a >>> file /usr/local/etc/rc.local, which (if it existed) would be >>> automatically sourced in at the end of rc.conf. Ports which built >>> daemons were allowed (well, actually, expected) to ask the user if >>> they wished to activate the port, and if so, the port would add a >>> line of the form 'portname_enable="YES"', and this would make your >>> new port operate. Well, it seems from what I see of my new system, >>> that this is no longer the case. I could understand (and approve of) >>> ports not being allowed to modify any /etc/contents, but howcome >>> ports can't use this rather obvious workaround? >>> >>> I'm pretty sure this used to be allowed... and it seems like a good >>> policy to me, from the number of non-technical folks who now run >>> FreeBSD. I just wanted to know why its not anymore. >>> __ > > > > _____________________________________________ >>> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 19:58:30 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2173B16A419 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:58:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0480A13C461 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:58:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: (qmail 12613 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2007 19:58:20 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 19 Nov 2007 19:58:20 -0000 Message-ID: <4741EA9C.9080202@chuckr.org> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:57:16 -0500 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071107 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Edwin Groothuis References: <4740E430.9050901@chuckr.org> <20071119031336.GA73804@k7.mavetju> In-Reply-To: <20071119031336.GA73804@k7.mavetju> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:58:30 -0000 Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 08:17:36PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: >> activate the port, and if so, the port would add a line of the form >> 'portname_enable="YES"', and this would make your new port operate. >> Well, it seems from what I see of my new system, that this is no longer >> the case. I could understand (and approve of) ports not being allowed >> to modify any /etc/contents, but howcome ports can't use this rather >> obvious workaround? > > I don't recall this behaviour at all, I think you're confused with > the messages which ports print at the end of the install-phase which > say "Add 'foo_enable="YES"'" to your /etc/rc.conf to enable this > port. > > Edwin Hmm. I remember this behavioour, but I can't find any example of it now. I need to go look up into my old cdroms (they're around here somewheres, I just need to go unearth them, way back to 1.0). Until I can prove this, I guess I will withdraw it, but I do remember this behavior. Ports, a long time back, used to do all the install steps that they reasonably could do. Couldn't do all the setups for things like dovecot, which has too many options, but even there, an attempt was made to change the conf file to something closer to a FreeBSD standard. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 20:00:37 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B5A16A468 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:00:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBF113C43E for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:00:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: (qmail 28084 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2007 20:00:28 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 19 Nov 2007 20:00:28 -0000 Message-ID: <4741EB1D.6020903@chuckr.org> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:59:25 -0500 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071107 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scot Hetzel References: <4740E430.9050901@chuckr.org> <20071119031336.GA73804@k7.mavetju> <790a9fff0711190042x73cd231cqbd643c39be2bd767@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0711190042x73cd231cqbd643c39be2bd767@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:00:37 -0000 Scot Hetzel wrote: > On 11/18/07, Edwin Groothuis wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 08:17:36PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: >>> activate the port, and if so, the port would add a line of the form >>> 'portname_enable="YES"', and this would make your new port operate. >>> Well, it seems from what I see of my new system, that this is no longer >>> the case. I could understand (and approve of) ports not being allowed >>> to modify any /etc/contents, but howcome ports can't use this rather >>> obvious workaround? >> I don't recall this behavior at all, I think you're confused with >> the messages which ports print at the end of the install-phase which >> say "Add 'foo_enable="YES"'" to your /etc/rc.conf to enable this >> port. >> > Edwin is correct that ports never had this behavior when they were > converted to the rc_ng startup script style, they always required the > system administrator to set the appropriate rc variable in > /etc/rc.conf. I remember the behavior, but not sure how far back it was. I was using FreeBSD before rc_ng, so it could have been a _long_ time back. > > Before rc_ng some scripts would automatically start on a reboot, while > others required copying the *.sh{-dist,-default,...} startup script to > one without the extentsion, as well as setting the execute bit. > > This is probably what you are remembering. > > Scot From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 20:03:52 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660B816A419 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:03:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491D113C44B for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:03:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: (qmail 22981 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2007 20:03:45 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 19 Nov 2007 20:03:45 -0000 Message-ID: <4741EBE1.4080502@chuckr.org> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:02:41 -0500 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071107 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Naram Qashat References: <4740E430.9050901@chuckr.org> <47410380.5080406@cyberbotx.com> <4741E3E3.7060808@chuckr.org> <4741E966.1090601@cyberbotx.com> In-Reply-To: <4741E966.1090601@cyberbotx.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:03:52 -0000 Naram Qashat wrote: > In the pkgtools.conf file that portupgrade installs, there's two > sections, BEFOREINSTALL and AFTERINSTALL. In BEFOREINSTALL, you could > put the following in to make it try to stop the service if there's an rc > script for the port: > > '*' => proc { |origin| cmd_stop_rc(origin) } > > And almost the same thing for AFTERINSTALL, except cmd_start_rc instead > of cmd_stop_rc. And as long as the line for that service is in > /etc/rc.conf, it'll start or stop via the rc script. It even says that > in the comments of pkgtools.conf. Ah, you misunderstood me. I was never saying, or meaning, that ports could not do it, I was saying they did not do it, no one I have seen implemented that behavior. Yes, you're certainly right, they can, they've had the ability all along. > > Naram Qashat > > Chuck Robey wrote: >> Naram Qashat wrote: >>> Also a good thing to point out is that portupgrade can be configured >>> to automatically start or stop a port's daemon via it's >>> /usr/local/etc/rc.d script, which still relies on having the >>> appropriate line in /etc/rc.conf to tell the rc.d script to run, but >>> it is helpful for upgrading ports which have daemons so they can be >>> shut down and then started again after the upgrade is complete. >> >> Not sure I understand what you mean here. I *think* I remember that >> ports (quoite a while back) did not require any patching of rc.conf at >> all, just coding in /usr/local/etc/rc.d. Nowadays, there are required >> lines in rc.conf which fire sections of rc.d, but apparently (and i do >> approve of this) the /etc/rc.conf can't be touched. I guess I don't >> understand why not have the entire startup code in rc.d, and merely >> have rc source in rc.d after it's finished with rc.conf. >> >> I just took a good long look at portupgrade, I didn't see any option >> like you're talking about. You understand, there is no reason that >> ports couldn't do what I'm asking about. They aren't written to do >> this (at least, several different daemon-ports that I've installed >> all required manual patching of rc.conf). This isn't just my own >> interpretation, because the ports themselves hint to the user that >> they should patch rc.conf to get the port working as a daemon. >> >> I'm just saying that ports should be written to handle this >> themselves, and not to require manual patching to get this done. One >> reason would be users (non-technical ones) who install a particular >> port as a dependency, and thus never even see the comments about what >> they should do to get things working. I can't see any reason NOT to >> do this, and good reason why it should be done. >> >>> >>> Naram Qashat >>> >>> Chuck Robey wrote: >>>> I was wondering why ports apparently aren't allowed an obvious >>>> freedom, that of being able to set themselves to run as daemons. A >>>> greate long time past, I seem to remember that there used to be a >>>> file /usr/local/etc/rc.local, which (if it existed) would be >>>> automatically sourced in at the end of rc.conf. Ports which built >>>> daemons were allowed (well, actually, expected) to ask the user if >>>> they wished to activate the port, and if so, the port would add a >>>> line of the form 'portname_enable="YES"', and this would make your >>>> new port operate. Well, it seems from what I see of my new system, >>>> that this is no longer the case. I could understand (and approve >>>> of) ports not being allowed to modify any /etc/contents, but howcome >>>> ports can't use this rather obvious workaround? >>>> >>>> I'm pretty sure this used to be allowed... and it seems like a good >>>> policy to me, from the number of non-technical folks who now run >>>> FreeBSD. I just wanted to know why its not anymore. >>>> __ >> >> >> >> _____________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 20:48:13 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB15616A473 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:48:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from smtpout04-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (smtpout04-01.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net [64.202.165.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF1D713C45B for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:48:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: (qmail 14052 invoked from network); 19 Nov 2007 20:21:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (208.206.151.5) by smtpout04-04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.199) with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2007 20:21:20 -0000 Message-ID: <4741F03F.5010508@computer.org> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:21:19 -0600 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071117) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports , FreeBSD Questions X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 OpenPGP: url=http://www.ravenlock.us/files/pub_schuele.pgp Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6EE8273F613C4788631121CD" Cc: Subject: Xephyr on freebsd... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:48:14 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6EE8273F613C4788631121CD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I was wondering if there is a port (that I can't seem to find), or one in the making of Xephyr (Xnest next generation?). If not... has anyone tried and had any luck with grabbing the sources from git and building it? Care to comment on pitfalls? --=20 Regards, Eric --------------enig6EE8273F613C4788631121CD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHQfBAngSDRM3IXUoRAv4zAKDnZ4/rjqrvXOFHcn0jo7+waplhoQCfXlbO Kmr+2Xu/oZKHtW2xhGVLj+Y= =PS01 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6EE8273F613C4788631121CD-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 04:45:16 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF6516A41A for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:45:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (dsl081-163-122.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.163.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A505013C468 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:45:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from w16.stradamotorsports.com (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAK4UCpg045455 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:30:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <474262D5.3010603@highperformance.net> Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:30:13 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070922) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=failed version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on s4.stradamotorsports.com Subject: Package Building in the Large X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:45:17 -0000 I have been toying with a variety of package building methods lately. My latest effort involves looking into the "Third Party Release Engineering" documented here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng-packages/index.html. Where do I start if I am looking for package building tools that the FreeBSD project uses for burning onto ROMs? Is ports/Tools/scripts/release the right place? The dates on the files there seem stale. What I am trying to do is to build 30 or so packages including the big ones like X, kde, gnome, plus all of their dependencies on a build host and then use pkg_add on various machines. I have had a variety of difficulties with all of the methods I have used thus far (portmaster, portupgrade, homegrown). Thanks, Jason C. Wells From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 07:12:00 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADB9216A420 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5217913C461 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:12:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u77so6652874pyb for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:11:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nVTZzB3RWuFKw4cm2esDqAAA8ghDm5eVX911/1SAFB8=; b=j6c5Habpi6ibtF3jI7PqdOa9zO0MdfCPdXesQ5mDZXBcrkFsLo6AplfruMTzJKBZ81V4blRTB17IIfQS4x3a8OAejkoaA0CBr0ktxe3s25D/SuslWOyFxOfyPq/aiohDKJqAe5ROS35/pETFJhI81g9mgb9RceqiqOVFEAe+bH0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bwrjgfKls2wXbrz9ZVlKajx0hy0II6LS4LZDeNSlrISW9mPiHNC550QCEdDRnBmC0FsbwQ1F+UGRsj3bhnUQYuyWpnNYmpZg1SK8TicD/usbv7PfWfQuhr69IlvCxk5dkDaE+zbIsgY/vgKHa8WK+wCuBBVt4H5HVTgMdJl2kkU= Received: by 10.65.150.18 with SMTP id c18mr13482272qbo.1195542708066; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:11:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.2.2? ( [67.85.89.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q15sm4532131qbq.2007.11.19.23.11.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:11:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <474288AE.1040106@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 02:11:42 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071111) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: who do I report this to? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:12:00 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Who do I report the following issue to (it falls into at least 3 camps)? If I am downloading a torrent in deluge 0.5.6.2_1 *AND* am logged into gmail (*WITH* a chat open) my network connection looses about 90% of it's capacity (for all applications), re(4) with the following: rgephy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto After some experimenting this problem *only* occurs under the above conditions. Addtional info: gnome 2.20.1 nv driver (latest) Xorg 7.3 FreeBSD monster 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #1: Thu Nov 15 19:17:50 EST 2007 aryeh@monster:/usr/obj/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/src/sys/MONSTER amd64 Buildworld done at the same time as buildkernelCopyright (c) 1992-2007 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation. FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #1: Thu Nov 15 19:17:50 EST 2007 aryeh@monster:/usr/obj/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/src/sys/MONSTER Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E6850 @ 3.00GHz (3005.68-MHz K8-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x6fb Stepping = 11 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0xe3fd AMD Features=0x20000800 AMD Features2=0x1 Cores per package: 2 usable memory = 4281409536 (4083 MB) avail memory = 4127895552 (3936 MB) ACPI APIC Table: <052107 APIC1013> FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard kbd1 at kbdmux0 ath_hal: 0.9.20.3 (AR5210, AR5211, AR5212, RF5111, RF5112, RF2413, RF5413) acpi0: <052107 RSDT1013> on motherboard acpi0: [ITHREAD] acpi0: Power Button (fixed) acpi0: reservation of 0, a0000 (3) failed acpi0: reservation of 100000, dff00000 (3) failed Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 ACPI Warning (tbutils-0243): Incorrect checksum in table [OEMB] - 86, should be 79 [20070320] est0: on cpu0 est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 92a092a0600092a device_attach: est0 attach returned 6 p4tcc0: on cpu0 cpu1: on acpi0 est1: on cpu1 est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 92a092a0600092a device_attach: est1 attach returned 6 p4tcc1: on cpu1 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: irq 16 at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 uhci0: port 0xcc00-0xcc1f irq 16 at device 26.0 on pci0 uhci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci0: [ITHREAD] usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: on usb0 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xc880-0xc89f irq 21 at device 26.1 on pci0 uhci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci1: [ITHREAD] usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: on usb1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xfcdffc00-0xfcdfffff irq 18 at device 26.7 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ehci0: [ITHREAD] usb2: EHCI version 1.0 usb2: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2: on ehci0 usb2: USB revision 2.0 uhub2: on usb2 uhub2: 4 ports with 4 removable, self powered pcm0: mem 0xfcdf8000-0xfcdfbfff irq 22 at device 27.0 on pci0 pcm0: [ITHREAD] pcib2: irq 17 at device 28.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 pcib3: irq 17 at device 28.4 on pci0 pci3: on pcib3 atapci0: port 0xdc00-0xdc07,0xd880-0xd883,0xd800-0xd807,0xd480-0xd483,0xd400-0xd40f mem 0xfceffc00-0xfcefffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci3 atapci0: [ITHREAD] ata2: on atapci0 ata2: [ITHREAD] pcib4: irq 16 at device 28.5 on pci0 pci4: on pcib4 re0: port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem 0xfcfff000-0xfcffffff irq 17 at device 0.0 on pci4 re0: Using 2 MSI messages miibus0: on re0 rgephy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto re0: Ethernet address: 00:19:db:b5:f8:0f re0: [FILTER] re0: [FILTER] uhci2: port 0xc800-0xc81f irq 23 at device 29.0 on pci0 uhci2: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci2: [ITHREAD] usb3: on uhci2 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: on usb3 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: port 0xc480-0xc49f irq 19 at device 29.1 on pci0 uhci3: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci3: [ITHREAD] usb4: on uhci3 usb4: USB revision 1.0 uhub4: on usb4 uhub4: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci4: port 0xc400-0xc41f irq 18 at device 29.2 on pci0 uhci4: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci4: [ITHREAD] usb5: on uhci4 usb5: USB revision 1.0 uhub5: on usb5 uhub5: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci5: port 0xc080-0xc09f irq 16 at device 29.3 on pci0 uhci5: [GIANT-LOCKED] uhci5: [ITHREAD] usb6: on uhci5 usb6: USB revision 1.0 uhub6: on usb6 uhub6: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci1: mem 0xfcdff800-0xfcdffbff irq 23 at device 29.7 on pci0 ehci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] ehci1: [ITHREAD] usb7: EHCI version 1.0 usb7: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb3 usb4 usb5 usb6 usb7: on ehci1 usb7: USB revision 2.0 uhub7: on usb7 uhub7: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered pcib5: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci5: on pcib5 vgapci0: mem 0xfd000000-0xfdffffff,0xf0000000-0xf7ffffff irq 17 at device 1.0 on pci5 isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci1: port 0xc000-0xc007,0xbc00-0xbc03,0xb880-0xb887,0xb800-0xb803,0xb480-0xb48f,0xb400-0xb40f irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0 atapci1: [ITHREAD] ata3: on atapci1 ata3: [ITHREAD] ata4: on atapci1 ata4: [ITHREAD] pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) atapci2: port 0xb000-0xb007,0xac00-0xac03,0xa880-0xa887,0xa800-0xa803,0xa480-0xa48f,0xa400-0xa40f irq 19 at device 31.5 on pci0 atapci2: [ITHREAD] ata5: on atapci2 ata5: [ITHREAD] ata6: on atapci2 ata6: [ITHREAD] acpi_button0: on acpi0 sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio0: [FILTER] fdc0: port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FILTER] ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 ppc0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ppc0: [ITHREAD] atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] atkbd0: [ITHREAD] orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcefff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 ums0: on uhub0 ums0: 3 buttons and Z dir. fuse4bsd: version 0.3.9-pre1, FUSE ABI 7.8 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ad4: 194481MB at ata2-master UDMA133 GEOM_LABEL: Label for provider ad4 is ufs/intad5: 238475MB at ata2-slave UDMA100 disk2. ad6: 476940MB at ata3-master SATA300 acd0: DVDR at ata4-master SATA150 pcm0: pcm0: SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched! - -- Aryeh M. Friedman Developer, not business, friendly http://www.flosoft-systems.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHQoiuJ9+1V27SttsRAlLXAJwI+OPgLH/0G4MR6gzB/7Dw+flhGACdEaBB zWErhfuW3gBIn75f+t3ao78= =ImbR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 07:30:37 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAB9516A420 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:30:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sigma.zx@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650D613C45D for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:30:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sigma.zx@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so2408619waf for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:30:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=W4tafc5w5IH43Q7iAMEx4P54NSc7fszBxd95AE25TRg=; b=j+JQVIp/ZOlNUCwmNYf+YZqKeWtTlBQoeZeKWfLYQoOFmTBr1707jNQHZg9ii5NREGNF8fK7FADZuYkqwIi6quR9tIdKTiwnKPnBejsvW2tla7Zo2OgEQZJ5d9ePAi+yq41y3LTzVk1njrxBcCN8XfxdFevhqOBJULQHeOpRUJo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=ckAqBnIEfYo1qlpR67BNbndZ1S8LBJce0R/FHOIp0S59T4czOAJ7GiwXAlC1VYSJECiDKBLIl4Fq7/G90x+/PnNY+TVNCEdhmslsgJ8zZFnRXEs4HYztYEOJJokNV2d7IXTOthulaNCgPAzqJVDXMVX/ZrP9hwaV46amgljKYFg= Received: by 10.114.77.1 with SMTP id z1mr910203waa.1195542371740; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:06:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.64? ( [154.20.188.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l23sm1287796waf.2007.11.19.23.06.08 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:06:09 -0800 (PST) From: Sean McLaughlin To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:05:24 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711192305.25060.sigma.zx@gmail.com> Subject: Total Ports System Failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:30:37 -0000 All of a sudden, my entire ports system is out-of-whack. Trying to make/portupgrade anything fails. For example, here is the output of installing audio/faad: -- begin -- # portupgrade audio/faad ---> Upgrading 'faad2-2.6,1' to 'faad2-2.6_1,1' (audio/faad) ---> Building '/usr/ports/audio/faad' ===> Cleaning for faad2-2.6_1,1 ===> Extracting for faad2-2.6_1,1 => MD5 Checksum OK for faad2-2.6.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for faad2-2.6.tar.gz. ===> Patching for faad2-2.6_1,1 ===> Converting DOS text files to UNIX text files ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for faad2-2.6_1,1 ===> faad2-2.6_1,1 depends on executable: gmake - found ===> faad2-2.6_1,1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/automake-1.5 - found ===> faad2-2.6_1,1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.61 - found ===> faad2-2.6_1,1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/libtool - found ===> Configuring for faad2-2.6_1,1 /bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports/audio/faad/work/faad2/plugins/bmp ---> Backing up the old version ---> Uninstalling the old version ---> Deinstalling 'faad2-2.6,1' ---> Preserving /usr/local/lib/libfaad.so.0 as /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libfaad.so.0 pkg_delete: package 'faad2-2.6,1' is required by these other packages and may not be deinstalled (but I'll delete it anyway): ffmpeg-2007.10.04_1 gnash-0.8.1 vlc-0.8.6.c_5,2 [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 713 packages found (-1 +0) (...) done] ---> Installing the new version via the port gmake: Makefile: No such file or directory gmake: *** No rule to make target `Makefile'. Stop. ===> Running ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig -m /usr/local/lib *** Error code 2 ===> Registering installation for faad2-2.6_1,1 pkg_create: pkg_perform: unable to open contents file '/usr/ports/audio/faad/work/.PLIST.mktmp' for input *** Error code 2 2 errors *** Error code 2 1 error ** Command failed [exit code 2]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade.9286.0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=faad2-2.6,1 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=2.6,1 make reinstall ---> Restoring the old version pkg_add: package faad2-2.6_1,1 has no origin recorded ** Fix the installation problem and try again. [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 715 packages found (-0 +2) .. done] ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! audio/faad (faad2-2.6,1) (install error) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed ** Could not clean up temporary directory: Directory not empty - /var/tmp/portupgradee4EOJEQa -- end -- And here is for archivers/arj: -- start -- # portinstall arj [Gathering depends for archivers/arj ................. done] ---> Installing 'arj-3.10.22_1' from a port (archivers/arj) ---> Building '/usr/ports/archivers/arj' ===> Cleaning for arj-3.10.22_1 ===> Extracting for arj-3.10.22_1 => MD5 Checksum OK for arj-3.10.22.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for arj-3.10.22.tar.gz. ===> Patching for arj-3.10.22_1 ===> arj-3.10.22_1 depends on executable: gmake - found ===> arj-3.10.22_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.61 - found ===> Configuring for arj-3.10.22_1 ---> Installing the new version via the port gmake: GNUmakefile: No such file or directory gmake: *** No rule to make target `GNUmakefile'. Stop. cd /usr/ports/archivers/arj/work/arj-3.10.22/doc && install -o root -g wheel -m 444 COPYING debug.txt /usr/local/share/doc/arj *** Error code 2 cd /usr/ports/archivers/arj/work/arj-3.10.22/resource/en && install -o root -g wheel -m 444 arjl.txt arjs.txt history.txt readme.txt unix.txt /usr/local/share/doc/arj 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error ** Command failed [exit code 2]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portinstall.6164.0 env make reinstall ** Fix the installation problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! archivers/arj (install error) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed -- end -- It seems like I have to go into the port directory and do "make do-configure", etc. manually. In addition, trying to upgrade jdk results in "Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no]" being written over and over. Plus, in doing a "make config", the dialog box on the blue background is set in the top-left corner, non-functions (keypresses show up a cyan text beneath it in a black row), and has to be interrupted with ^C. I though I might've added something to /etc/make.conf to cause this, but removing that file had no effect. The only out-of-the-ordinary thing that happend was a power failure in the middle of upgrading a bunch of ports a day or so ago. I was asleep so I don't know at what point. Seems like that was the point after which everything broke. The last portsnap I did was a few seconds ago. The uname is FreeBSD Pavilion 6.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.3-PRERELEASE #1: Mon Oct 29 14:34:26 PDT 2007 toor@Pavilion:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYSMP i386 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 08:01:23 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1754D16A41A; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:01:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from galain.elvandar.org (galain.elvandar.org [217.148.169.56]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7777313C44B; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:01:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=galain.elvandar.org) by galain.elvandar.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IuNYQ-000B5k-Bw; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:29:54 +0100 Received: from 194.74.82.3 (SquirrelMail authenticated user remko) by galain.elvandar.org with HTTP; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:29:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47498.194.74.82.3.1195543794.squirrel@galain.elvandar.org> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:29:54 +0100 (CET) From: "Remko Lodder" To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: who do I report this to? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: remko@elvandar.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:01:23 -0000 Can you please STOP cross posting to various mailinglists all at once? It is causing all kinds of unneeded messages to various addresses (yeah I am now guilty of that as well); stop it. If you have issues with if_re, please ask it's maintainer for support, and rule that out first and then proceed to the next item if the problem still continues, generating loads of emails with "my " content which includes "but this and this and this and this might also be the combination" etc is NOT going to help resolve this because the options are too legio (could be the software, could be your hardware, could be a user flaw, could be the remote switch etc). Please do it step by step with the maintainers as much as possible, and where possible please try to avoid overloading the mailinglists with things you run into on a day by day basis, personally I find it not very interesting to read them anymore because "its just another thing", that might not be the thing we are persuing here, but with all of your emails, I do get this feeling. //Remko On Tue, November 20, 2007 8:11 am, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > Who do I report the following issue to (it falls into at least 3 camps)? > > If I am downloading a torrent in deluge 0.5.6.2_1 *AND* am logged into > gmail (*WITH* a chat open) my network connection looses about 90% of > it's capacity (for all applications), re(4) with the following: > > rgephy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 > rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, > 1000baseT-FDX, auto > -- /"\ Best regards, | remko@FreeBSD.org \ / Remko Lodder | remko@EFnet X http://www.evilcoder.org/ | / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 10:18:20 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A2916A419 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (pointyhat.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3636813C457; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:18:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4742B470.7040001@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:18:24 +0100 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jason C. Wells" References: <474262D5.3010603@highperformance.net> In-Reply-To: <474262D5.3010603@highperformance.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Package Building in the Large X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:18:20 -0000 Jason C. Wells wrote: > I have been toying with a variety of package building methods lately. > My latest effort involves looking into the "Third Party Release > Engineering" documented here: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng-packages/index.html. > > > Where do I start if I am looking for package building tools that the > FreeBSD project uses for burning onto ROMs? Is > ports/Tools/scripts/release the right place? The dates on the files > there seem stale. ports/Tools/portbuild/scripts/ > What I am trying to do is to build 30 or so packages including the big > ones like X, kde, gnome, plus all of their dependencies on a build host > and then use pkg_add on various machines. I have had a variety of > difficulties with all of the methods I have used thus far (portmaster, > portupgrade, homegrown). Probably you want the tinderbox port though, unless you need to distribute across many build hosts. Kris From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 11:52:53 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568E416A417 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:52:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dp.laurent@wanadoo.fr) Received: from smtp23.orange.fr (smtp23.orange.fr [193.252.22.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B6613C447 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dp.laurent@wanadoo.fr) Received: from smtp23.orange.fr (mwinf2341 [10.232.4.141]) by mwinf2320.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 78D141C3444A for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:20:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf2341.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A99D01C00093 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:20:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from p4 (AAmiens-151-1-28-83.w83-192.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.192.40.83]) by mwinf2341.orange.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6C3BF1C00096 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:20:36 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20071119232036443.6C3BF1C00096@mwinf2341.orange.fr From: "Laurent" To: Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:20:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcgrAnv6ZHYOjRgFS3i9b20IniIgNg== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Message-Id: <20071119232036.6C3BF1C00096@mwinf2341.orange.fr> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:35:11 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Perl 5.8.2 issue with SIG{CHLD}? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:52:53 -0000 hello I noticed that the Perl 5.8.2 port isn't handling $SIG{CHLD} signals as previous versions have, and wondered if anyone had experienced similar problems? how to do ? thanks From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 13:49:07 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E5716A418 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:49:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from cauchy.math.missouri.edu (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FEE613C4BE for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:49:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from laptop2.gateway.2wire.net (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by cauchy.math.missouri.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAKDmnoX040481; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:48:50 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Message-ID: <4742E5C5.3000808@math.missouri.edu> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:48:53 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071107 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" References: <474288AE.1040106@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <474288AE.1040106@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: who do I report this to? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:49:07 -0000 Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Who do I report the following issue to (it falls into at least 3 camps)? > > If I am downloading a torrent in deluge 0.5.6.2_1 *AND* am logged into > gmail (*WITH* a chat open) my network connection looses about 90% of > it's capacity (for all applications), re(4) with the following: > > rgephy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 > rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, > 1000baseT-FDX, auto > > After some experimenting this problem *only* occurs under the above > conditions. > > Addtional info: > > gnome 2.20.1 > nv driver (latest) > Xorg 7.3 > > FreeBSD monster 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #1: Thu Nov 15 > 19:17:50 EST 2007 > aryeh@monster:/usr/obj/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/src/sys/MONSTER amd64 This sounds similar to my problem. When I have my computer on for some time, my ndis0 driver with its Broadcom 1350 wifi card sometimes starts going very slowly. And even if this doesn't happen, xorg (I have the same gnome and xorg set up as you) freezes up the computer while it is exiting. This is on FreeBSD 7.0 Beta 3. I reported to freebsd-stable, but I didn't get any response. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 14:12:40 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECF616A418 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:12:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D4513C474 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:12:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAKECXsv038969 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:12:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id lAKECXtY038968; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:12:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin To: ports@FreeBSD.org Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:12:33 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: dependencies out of hand? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:12:40 -0000 Why do I need to install cdrecord in order to build X-server? glib and gtk seem necessary too... -mi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 14:21:04 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EC916A419; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:21:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from darklight.org.ru (ipv6.darklight.org.ru [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:84::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A65713C44B; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from darklight.org.ru (yuri@darklight.org.ru [IPv6:::1]) by darklight.org.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id lAKEKugO093521; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:20:57 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by darklight.org.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id lAKEKrid093520; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:20:53 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: darklight.org.ru: yuri set sender to yuri.pankov@gmail.com using -f From: Yuri Pankov To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:20:53 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200711200912.33376@aldan> In-Reply-To: <200711200912.33376@aldan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711201720.53864.yuri.pankov@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org, Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: dependencies out of hand? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:21:04 -0000 On Tuesday 20 November 2007 17:12:33 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Why do I need to install cdrecord in order to build X-server? > > glib and gtk seem necessary too... > > -mi New xorg-server utilizes sysutils/hal for hardware autodetection, glib20 and cdrecord are dependencies of hal (can be turned off using WITHOUT_HAL). It also needs dbus, polkit and so on. Not sure about gtk. HTH, Yuri From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 14:21:04 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31EC916A419; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:21:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from darklight.org.ru (ipv6.darklight.org.ru [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:84::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A65713C44B; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from darklight.org.ru (yuri@darklight.org.ru [IPv6:::1]) by darklight.org.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id lAKEKugO093521; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:20:57 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by darklight.org.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id lAKEKrid093520; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:20:53 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: darklight.org.ru: yuri set sender to yuri.pankov@gmail.com using -f From: Yuri Pankov To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:20:53 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200711200912.33376@aldan> In-Reply-To: <200711200912.33376@aldan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711201720.53864.yuri.pankov@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org, Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: dependencies out of hand? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:21:04 -0000 On Tuesday 20 November 2007 17:12:33 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Why do I need to install cdrecord in order to build X-server? > > glib and gtk seem necessary too... > > -mi New xorg-server utilizes sysutils/hal for hardware autodetection, glib20 and cdrecord are dependencies of hal (can be turned off using WITHOUT_HAL). It also needs dbus, polkit and so on. Not sure about gtk. HTH, Yuri From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 14:35:04 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FB4D16A468; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:35:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from darklight.org.ru (ipv6.darklight.org.ru [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:84::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C2413C465; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:35:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from darklight.org.ru (yuri@darklight.org.ru [IPv6:::1]) by darklight.org.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id lAKEYw6s093622; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:34:59 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by darklight.org.ru (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id lAKEYvqH093621; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:34:57 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: darklight.org.ru: yuri set sender to yuri.pankov@gmail.com using -f From: Yuri Pankov To: Mikhail Teterin Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:34:57 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200711200912.33376@aldan> <200711201720.53864.yuri.pankov@gmail.com> <200711200927.31037@aldan> In-Reply-To: <200711200927.31037@aldan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711201734.57547.yuri.pankov@gmail.com> Cc: x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dependencies out of hand? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:35:04 -0000 On Tuesday 20 November 2007 17:27:30 Mikhail Teterin wrote: > On =D7=A6=D7=D4=CF=D2=CF=CB 20 =CC=C9=D3=D4=CF=D0=C1=C4 2007, Yuri Pankov= wrote: > =3D New xorg-server utilizes sysutils/hal for hardware autodetection, > glib20 =3D and cdrecord are dependencies of hal (can be turned off > using =3D WITHOUT_HAL). It also needs dbus, polkit and so on. Not sure > about gtk. > > Thanks, Yuri. But I could trace the dependencies myself. My point Well, sorry for the noise. > was, something is wrong if an unrelated utility such as cdrecord and > a large (and frequently changing) library such as glib are both > /required/ to build the X-server. > > Maybe, the WITHOUT_HAL knob should be more visible... Maybe, it > should not require cdrecord by default. > > I don't have a solution -- I'm just pointing out a problem... > > -mi Yuri From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 14:55:34 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307B716A474 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D548B13C459 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:55:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAKERVap039375 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:27:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id lAKERVGH039374; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:27:31 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin To: Yuri Pankov Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:27:30 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 References: <200711200912.33376@aldan> <200711201720.53864.yuri.pankov@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200711201720.53864.yuri.pankov@gmail.com> X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dependencies out of hand? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:55:34 -0000 On =D7=A6=D7=D4=CF=D2=CF=CB 20 =CC=C9=D3=D4=CF=D0=C1=C4 2007, Yuri Pankov w= rote: =3D New xorg-server utilizes sysutils/hal for hardware autodetection, glib2= 0=20 =3D and cdrecord are dependencies of hal (can be turned off using=20 =3D WITHOUT_HAL). It also needs dbus, polkit and so on. Not sure about gtk. Thanks, Yuri. But I could trace the dependencies myself. My point was,=20 something is wrong if an unrelated utility such as cdrecord and a large (an= d=20 frequently changing) library such as glib are both /required/ to build the= =20 X-server. Maybe, the WITHOUT_HAL knob should be more visible... Maybe, it should not= =20 require cdrecord by default. I don't have a solution -- I'm just pointing out a problem... -mi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 14:57:08 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD7316A46B for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:57:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from plouf.absolight.net (plouf.absolight.net [IPv6:2002:c11e:e088:2:c:6ebf:fe78:348]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E520313C457 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:57:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from plouf.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by plouf.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65C1976400B; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:57:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from atuin.local (ATuin.in.mat.cc [193.30.224.125]) by plouf.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38DDA764003; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:57:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atuin.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC58E5A3C08; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:57:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:57:02 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Laurent , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <34B0CD9D946856878635C492@atuin.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: <20071119232036.6C3BF1C00096@mwinf2341.orange.fr> References: <20071119232036.6C3BF1C00096@mwinf2341.orange.fr> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="==========3C501791DCF1EBF51FCC==========" Cc: Subject: Re: Perl 5.8.2 issue with SIG{CHLD}? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:57:08 -0000 --==========3C501791DCF1EBF51FCC========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline +-Le 20/11/07 00:20 +0100, Laurent a dit : | how to do ? Hum, perl 5.8.2 got released on 5 Nov 2003, that's four years old, there have been a few releases since, the last one being 5.8.8, which is a year and a half old. Maybe you could upgrade ? -- Mathieu Arnold --==========3C501791DCF1EBF51FCC========== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) iD8DBQFHQvXAJqR8av5thQ8RAsqkAJ4il7BBDDLaO4u/NElKauUJ2AzYLwCgnMWA iLcOFHlsse0boEc8fWqS2vQ= =h+yZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==========3C501791DCF1EBF51FCC==========-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 15:13:56 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82EEF16A420 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:13:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from khera@kcilink.com) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (thingy.kcilink.com [74.92.149.59]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B8A13C46B for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:13:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from khera@kcilink.com) Received: from host-121.int.kcilink.com (host-121.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.121]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E781C943A for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:56:07 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kcilink.com; s=kci0709; t=1195570568; bh=zceVH0zUBezjXeIJO6vJUz1OBFs4bvHIMFCyzcw oZig=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References: X-Mailer; b=jxFBvGer0TIwPtEptyxY/RL2HkBx+cmrY7AXJ5GiFQ3/RGQ9Wjj3HG EHiZYEcuJrmaNp6ahps92xWc3apctVWny0O7zTvWJbaysMwPBHTpSZFbJYX3/iPnQXZ Gax7RgWToUmkgTunaLLFtmyIMPT4YZSOVwb9c7WcOWqyMCw8O8= Message-Id: From: Vivek Khera To: freebsd ports In-Reply-To: <200711192305.25060.sigma.zx@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:56:07 -0500 References: <200711192305.25060.sigma.zx@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) Subject: Re: Total Ports System Failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:13:56 -0000 On Nov 20, 2007, at 2:05 AM, Sean McLaughlin wrote: > ===> Configuring for arj-3.10.22_1 > ---> Installing the new version via the port > gmake: GNUmakefile: No such file or directory > gmake: *** No rule to make target `GNUmakefile'. Stop. > cd /usr/ports/archivers/arj/work/arj-3.10.22/doc && install -o root > -g did you replace your system make with gmake? ports depends on the BSD make. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 15:45:34 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FDBB16A41A; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:45:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ATRENS@nortel.com) Received: from zcars04f.nortel.com (zcars04f.nortel.com [47.129.242.57]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99AEE13C4B8; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:45:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ATRENS@nortel.com) Received: from zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com (zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com [47.129.230.99]) by zcars04f.nortel.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id lAKFKj711337; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:20:45 GMT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:16:29 -0500 Message-ID: <87AC5F88F03E6249AEA68D40BD3E00BE05274596@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: who do I report this to? Thread-Index: Acgrh8GnLmMdVINsStO2Zj9j0UrF1gAAJHDU References: <474288AE.1040106@gmail.com> <4742E5C5.3000808@math.missouri.edu> From: "Andrew Atrens" To: "Stephen Montgomery-Smith" , "Aryeh M. Friedman" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: RE: who do I report this to? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:45:34 -0000 Are you on asymmetric DSL (ADSL) or some other residential connection = s.t. the uplink pipe is considerably smaller than the downlink pipe? If so you could be seeing ACK starvation - it's a well understood = problem, as is the solution - http://www.benzedrine.cx/ackpri.html --Andrew -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org on behalf of Stephen = Montgomery-Smith Sent: Tue 11/20/2007 8:48 AM To: Aryeh M. Friedman Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org; FreeBSD Questions; = freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: who do I report this to? =20 Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 > Who do I report the following issue to (it falls into at least 3 = camps)? >=20 > If I am downloading a torrent in deluge 0.5.6.2_1 *AND* am logged into > gmail (*WITH* a chat open) my network connection looses about 90% of > it's capacity (for all applications), re(4) with the following: >=20 > rgephy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 > rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, > 1000baseT-FDX, auto >=20 > After some experimenting this problem *only* occurs under the above > conditions. >=20 > Addtional info: >=20 > gnome 2.20.1 > nv driver (latest) > Xorg 7.3 >=20 > FreeBSD monster 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #1: Thu Nov 15 > 19:17:50 EST 2007 =20 > aryeh@monster:/usr/obj/FreeBSD/FreeBSD-current/src/sys/MONSTER amd64 This sounds similar to my problem. When I have my computer on for some=20 time, my ndis0 driver with its Broadcom 1350 wifi card sometimes starts=20 going very slowly. And even if this doesn't happen, xorg (I have the=20 same gnome and xorg set up as you) freezes up the computer while it is=20 exiting. This is on FreeBSD 7.0 Beta 3. I reported to freebsd-stable, but I didn't get any response. _______________________________________________ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 16:03:26 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C2016A421 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:03:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from clarkjp@charter.net) Received: from mail.cluebytwelve.org (clueby12.org [198.186.190.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E578213C46E for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:03:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from clarkjp@charter.net) Received: from localdomain.local (24-158-189-217.dhcp.jcsn.tn.charter.com [24.158.189.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cluebytwelve.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0DFD1B5C7 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:37:53 -0600 (CST) Received: by localdomain.local (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3E305B89F; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:37:47 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 09:37:47 -0600 From: "J. Porter Clark" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071120153747.GA43531@auricle.charter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:10:08 +0000 Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:03:26 -0000 Newsgroups: mailing.freebsd.ports Subject: Re: dependencies out of hand? References: From: jpc@porterclark.com (J. Porter Clark) Organization: http://www.angelfire.com/ego/porterclark/ mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com (Mikhail Teterin) writes: >Thanks, Yuri. But I could trace the dependencies myself. My point was, How do you trace the dependencies? I have found this uncommonly difficult. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 16:37:39 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E2316A41A for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:37:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sigma.zx@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFBF13C45A for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:37:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sigma.zx@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so2570826waf for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:37:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=LhDVceavlfxXXSWpQ3oKtDbJtsfm3BoiT1lsD2VgtBI=; b=OcdaB8j6Cv0RtfYH/Lnm1p3glcW/0QlX/6nvQ48gGXoeX0tg4IbBVYeQPMqlArC8c4VLICH7IETnHT9Ry8A3PqIfZ8rAKdx8QOtOft6MhVHbN3tQPjuPAkt3WbdDeRthKYynMOzcFep5fCvv17xdoeGcg72qjEfRagnRC4vg/KQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=R73MufPoli/jMgCvQLyxoNbEg74yM6R5nSGoZSyh8nSLkj0JlUcePvjO9oZ4lXAJWfZ7s57VgJXmPXBsxe1FT8nUBjULTet1BvXmSfh/pzVyxeRiVHlkzC2jtDF6OmBBIrtNHkGUeyk6WhKKhlx/ZO7mSchV0CpNm42f39+xkPA= Received: by 10.114.159.1 with SMTP id h1mr74607wae.1195576657195; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:37:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.64? ( [154.20.188.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n9sm12143004wag.2007.11.20.08.37.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:37:35 -0800 (PST) From: Sean McLaughlin To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:37:21 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200711192305.25060.sigma.zx@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711200837.21524.sigma.zx@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Total Ports System Failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:37:39 -0000 On Tuesday, November 20, 2007 06:56:07 am Vivek Khera wrote: > On Nov 20, 2007, at 2:05 AM, Sean McLaughlin wrote: > > ===> Configuring for arj-3.10.22_1 > > ---> Installing the new version via the port > > gmake: GNUmakefile: No such file or directory > > gmake: *** No rule to make target `GNUmakefile'. Stop. > > cd /usr/ports/archivers/arj/work/arj-3.10.22/doc && install -o root > > -g > > did you replace your system make with gmake? ports depends on the BSD > make. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" # which make /usr/bin/make From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 17:32:32 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798F516A46D for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:32:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DAC8D13C44B for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:32:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 20 Nov 2007 17:32:30 -0000 Received: from vpn-cl-165-1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de (EHLO mobileKamikaze.norad) [141.3.165.1] by mail.gmx.net (mp057) with SMTP; 20 Nov 2007 18:32:30 +0100 X-Authenticated: #5465401 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18l9QRyZXIlGWgUN5Rx9ZT6U8CS3WfaH4exHzA9EE a0GJpX9wMnudnq Message-ID: <47431A2D.1080801@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:32:29 +0100 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071117) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: overlay troubles with mplayer X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:32:32 -0000 The following scenario FreeBSD 7.0-Beta-2 on i386 with a Radeon Mobility 7500 $ xrandr Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 2464 x 900, maximum 3072 x 1536 VGA-0 connected 1440x900+1024+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 410mm x 257mm 1440x900 59.9*+ 75.0 59.9 LVDS connected 1024x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 0mm x 0mm 1024x768 59.9*+ 60.0 S-video disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) I want to play a video on the right screen (external 16:10 LCD screen) with mplayer. Moving the window to the screen and resizing works fine, but as soon as I hit F for the full screen mode the video is scaled inside a 1024x768 region in the top left corner of screen (the remaining space is black), as if it was meant to be drawn on the first screen. The workaround is to make the larger screen the primary one by moving it to the left $ xrandr --output VGA-0 --left-of LVDS I don't know weather this is a bug in mplayer or in xorg, so I'm sending this to ports@ and x11@. Suggestions about the cause as well as workarounds that don't require me to move the monitors around (from an xrandr perspective) are highly appreciated. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 17:43:34 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F4D16A421 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:43:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from khera@kcilink.com) Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (thingy.kcilink.com [74.92.149.59]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0815413C455 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:43:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from khera@kcilink.com) Received: from host-121.int.kcilink.com (host-121.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.121]) by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065ACC943A for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:43:32 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=kcilink.com; s=kci0709; t=1195580613; bh=iIKDZTIKJO37o6wUTmrlO+cgNmcWlcSHgOptEXr nzC4=; h=Message-Id:From:To:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References: X-Mailer; b=DvI79wpO7GrvMuuK+ishBG/wqtnC4beQ8OHKfQbiXlDgMXVi3KuLsE cZj4rwH7EnpkCLBicJ+39nW0UNxHmBMTVuTWV3zHmhAyKpb1+V+j7XCfmFygoSSAAqz c4CqKbDgHjer0xVH5uvMPgMgXAfOMlFMnBgR50sirawIq2kvSc= Message-Id: From: Vivek Khera To: freebsd ports In-Reply-To: <200711200837.21524.sigma.zx@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v915) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 12:43:32 -0500 References: <200711192305.25060.sigma.zx@gmail.com> <200711200837.21524.sigma.zx@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.915) Subject: Re: Total Ports System Failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:43:34 -0000 On Nov 20, 2007, at 11:37 AM, Sean McLaughlin wrote: >> did you replace your system make with gmake? ports depends on the >> BSD >> make. >> >> > # which make > /usr/bin/make what's the output of /usr/bin/make --version did you redefine the MAKE variable in your /etc/make.conf? There are many ways to replace make with gmake :-) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 17:45:31 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CEA816A46B for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:45:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (lefty.soaustin.net [66.135.55.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CD513C458 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:45:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 97E748C0EB; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:45:30 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:45:30 -0600 To: "J. Porter Clark" Message-ID: <20071120174530.GB16815@soaustin.net> References: <20071120153747.GA43531@auricle.charter.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071120153747.GA43531@auricle.charter.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:45:31 -0000 On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 09:37:47AM -0600, J. Porter Clark wrote: > How do you trace the dependencies? I have found this uncommonly > difficult. make all-depends-list make build-depends-list make package-depends-list make actual-package-depends make run-depends-list make pretty-print-build-depends-list make pretty-print-run-depends-list and ports/ports-mgmt/pkg_tree are pretty good places to start. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 18:52:02 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F2A16A476 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:52:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sigma.zx@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D6AA13C46E for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:52:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sigma.zx@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so1872605rvb for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:51:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=OLYKSSJdHv6W/Uj6aEIROAptRJTXqX7vd0clEtih7tg=; b=gy9pPqtnkc02baYdzhHTYv2kDS26SFpyh0D77XXLkLNUVxhWHuHLpF2jb2cUigy2YJVCuM2oBDB3JYVwEII88DjCE2qs5BeKAAipH2KjTCtTdKeaC57QSv4GB7qXoJqhBBzzS0wN1bU4iohvtdLwAyYiE3TC5AP1FcFCxats/tU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=pTUcJGRzMVDEVjT/FUmBgz1uFw5Q0lFIIA1JliVtNm987DTQ2rzBWjinWvC6v3ZjVCH6QXJkWJieXEe3Ik4F5gXnR7SOX5hKKc8DZjDqI+usTbcDtfMMo/QlL56Zvp/QXe13eHzQIZvnllZ0pi7nM+MkNneAO3BMNUznWGtr4lc= Received: by 10.140.179.18 with SMTP id b18mr2545094rvf.1195584714869; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:51:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.64? ( [154.20.188.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l32sm3626115rvb.2007.11.20.10.51.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:51:53 -0800 (PST) From: Sean McLaughlin To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 10:51:40 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200711192305.25060.sigma.zx@gmail.com> <200711200837.21524.sigma.zx@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711201051.40495.sigma.zx@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Total Ports System Failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:52:02 -0000 > what's the output of > > /usr/bin/make --version An illegal option error. > did you redefine the MAKE variable in your /etc/make.conf? No. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 21:12:30 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD5B16A417 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:12:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: from emma.lautre.net (emma.lautre.net [80.67.160.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A9213C459 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:12:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AA8131141C; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:12:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:12:24 +0100 From: Thierry Thomas To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith , FreeBSD Ports List Message-ID: <20071120211224.GJ85384@graf.pompo.net> Mail-Followup-To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith , FreeBSD Ports List References: <4740FB72.5010206@math.missouri.edu> <20071119062848.GS57695@graf.pompo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KN5l+BnMqAQyZLvT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071119062848.GS57695@graf.pompo.net> X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc; y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-BETA2 i386 Organization: Kabbale Eros X-PGP: 0xC71405A2 Cc: Subject: Re: stlport X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:12:30 -0000 --KN5l+BnMqAQyZLvT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Lun 19 nov 07 =E0 7:28:48 +0100, Thierry Thomas =E9crivait=A0: > Le Lun 19 nov 07 =E0 3:56:50 +0100, Stephen Montgomery-Smith > =E9crivait=A0: > =20 > > Is anyone working on this? If not, would you guys be kind enough to=20 > > make my patch more proper? >=20 > I'm working on a patch to upgrade it to the latest STLport-5.1.4 (from > ). If you want to test it, my patch is available at . It does not seem bad on i386, but there is a problem on amd64: it builds and installs fine, but the regression tests eat all the memory! (If no solution is found, I shall mark it broken on !=3D i386). Regards, --=20 Th. Thomas. --KN5l+BnMqAQyZLvT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHQ024c95pjMcUBaIRAkiFAJ4hmufglphTxP5KzEK+kY0wbaO5GwCePH0/ VTy40N77Fc4V0H3cOjrum/Q= =P2N6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KN5l+BnMqAQyZLvT-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 21:46:16 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1C916A417 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:46:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8BE13C442 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:46:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: (qmail 5848 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2007 21:46:15 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 20 Nov 2007 21:46:15 -0000 Message-ID: <4743556D.7070800@chuckr.org> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:45:17 -0500 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071107 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: a2ps users with HP Deskjets/OfficeJets? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 21:46:16 -0000 I was wondering if there are any a2ps users who have HP DeskJet or OfficeJet printers? I wanted to confirm something before i sent some patches upstream. It's the size of the print offsets, which are smaller on those printers. The default setup in the a2ps-letterdj port is wrong for me, and I suspect it would be for you also. There's a line in the /usr/local/etc/a2ps.cfg file that sets the size of the letterdj offsets, and I changed mine from: Medium: Letterdj 612 792 24 40 588 768 to Medium: Letterdj 612 792 18 36 594 756 I'd just like someone else with this kind of printer to tell me if these setups work better for you. Specifically, they more correctly set the right hand margins and the size of the page.. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 22:41:38 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D985716A418 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D118C13C447 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: (qmail 29374 invoked from network); 20 Nov 2007 22:41:38 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 20 Nov 2007 22:41:38 -0000 Message-ID: <47436268.2050704@chuckr.org> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 17:40:40 -0500 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071107 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: testing skype X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:41:38 -0000 Anybody who has skype up and working, and has a few free minutes, would you care to help me test my brand new skype setup? Write me privately, ok? Thanks From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 23:35:10 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8468D16A420 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:35:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5302213C467 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:35:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IuccQ-00086s-3g for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:35:02 +0000 Received: from 81.210.227.230 ([81.210.227.230]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:35:02 +0000 Received: from saper by 81.210.227.230 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:35:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Marcin Cieslak Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:20:25 +0100 Lines: 8 Message-ID: References: <47436268.2050704@chuckr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.210.227.230 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071119 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 In-Reply-To: <47436268.2050704@chuckr.org> Sender: news Subject: Re: testing skype X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 23:35:10 -0000 Chuck Robey wrote: > Anybody who has skype up and working, and has a few free minutes, would > you care to help me test my brand new skype setup? Write me privately, ok? There is a test robot you can call and talk to - it's called "echo123". (Sorry don't have skype here right now). --Marcin From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 21 00:20:43 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05ED516A41B; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:20:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from cauchy.math.missouri.edu (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCD2E13C448; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:20:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from laptop2.gateway.2wire.net (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by cauchy.math.missouri.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAL0KSK7043569; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:20:31 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Message-ID: <474379D0.3040702@math.missouri.edu> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:20:32 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071107 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thierry Thomas , FreeBSD Ports List References: <4740FB72.5010206@math.missouri.edu> <20071119062848.GS57695@graf.pompo.net> <20071120211224.GJ85384@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <20071120211224.GJ85384@graf.pompo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: stlport X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:20:43 -0000 Thierry Thomas wrote: > Le Lun 19 nov 07 à 7:28:48 +0100, Thierry Thomas > écrivait : >> Le Lun 19 nov 07 à 3:56:50 +0100, Stephen Montgomery-Smith >> écrivait : >> >>> Is anyone working on this? If not, would you guys be kind enough to >>> make my patch more proper? >> I'm working on a patch to upgrade it to the latest STLport-5.1.4 (from >> ). > > If you want to test it, my patch is available at > . > > It does not seem bad on i386, but there is a problem on amd64: it builds > and installs fine, but the regression tests eat all the memory! (If no > solution is found, I shall mark it broken on != i386). > > Regards, It didn't build at all on my system. I am sure it is a problem with stlport/config/stl_gcc.h. What version of FreeBSD are you using? Did you build it with gcc or icc? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 21 00:43:46 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6352416A41A; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:43:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from cauchy.math.missouri.edu (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC93A13C465; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:43:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from laptop2.gateway.2wire.net (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by cauchy.math.missouri.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAL0NRrr043616; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:23:28 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Message-ID: <47437A83.2050807@math.missouri.edu> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:23:31 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071107 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thierry Thomas , FreeBSD Ports List References: <4740FB72.5010206@math.missouri.edu> <20071119062848.GS57695@graf.pompo.net> <20071120211224.GJ85384@graf.pompo.net> <474379D0.3040702@math.missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <474379D0.3040702@math.missouri.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: stlport X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:43:46 -0000 Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > Thierry Thomas wrote: >> Le Lun 19 nov 07 à 7:28:48 +0100, Thierry Thomas >> écrivait : >>> Le Lun 19 nov 07 à 3:56:50 +0100, Stephen Montgomery-Smith >>> >>> écrivait : >>> >>>> Is anyone working on this? If not, would you guys be kind enough to >>>> make my patch more proper? >>> I'm working on a patch to upgrade it to the latest STLport-5.1.4 (from >>> ). >> >> If you want to test it, my patch is available at >> . >> >> It does not seem bad on i386, but there is a problem on amd64: it builds >> and installs fine, but the regression tests eat all the memory! (If no >> solution is found, I shall mark it broken on != i386). >> >> Regards, > > It didn't build at all on my system. I am sure it is a problem with > stlport/config/stl_gcc.h. > > What version of FreeBSD are you using? Did you build it with gcc or icc? Scatch what I said about stl_gcc.h. It doesn't even exist on this version of stlport. Let me look at it a bit more and report back. Sorry about the noise, but it truly didn't build on my system. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 21 00:44:34 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D618616A418; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:44:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from cauchy.math.missouri.edu (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 989DB13C448; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:44:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from laptop2.gateway.2wire.net (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by cauchy.math.missouri.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAL0iT72043721; Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:44:30 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Message-ID: <47437F71.6040400@math.missouri.edu> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 18:44:33 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071107 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thierry Thomas , FreeBSD Ports List References: <4740FB72.5010206@math.missouri.edu> <20071119062848.GS57695@graf.pompo.net> <20071120211224.GJ85384@graf.pompo.net> <474379D0.3040702@math.missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <474379D0.3040702@math.missouri.edu> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------030003050609080706060501" Cc: Subject: Re: stlport X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:44:34 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030003050609080706060501 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > Thierry Thomas wrote: >> Le Lun 19 nov 07 à 7:28:48 +0100, Thierry Thomas >> écrivait : >>> Le Lun 19 nov 07 à 3:56:50 +0100, Stephen Montgomery-Smith >>> >>> écrivait : >>> >>>> Is anyone working on this? If not, would you guys be kind enough to >>>> make my patch more proper? >>> I'm working on a patch to upgrade it to the latest STLport-5.1.4 (from >>> ). >> >> If you want to test it, my patch is available at >> . >> >> It does not seem bad on i386, but there is a problem on amd64: it builds >> and installs fine, but the regression tests eat all the memory! (If no >> solution is found, I shall mark it broken on != i386). >> >> Regards, > > It didn't build at all on my system. I am sure it is a problem with > stlport/config/stl_gcc.h. > > What version of FreeBSD are you using? Did you build it with gcc or icc? Adding this attached file to stlport/files made it work for my system. --------------030003050609080706060501 Content-Type: text/plain; name="patch-stlport::stl::config::_gcc.h" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="patch-stlport::stl::config::_gcc.h" --- stlport/stl/config/_gcc.h.orig 2007-11-20 18:33:19.000000000 -0600 +++ stlport/stl/config/_gcc.h 2007-11-20 18:34:45.000000000 -0600 @@ -352,9 +352,9 @@ /* * Before version 3.4.0 the 0 patch level was not part of the include path: */ -# elif defined (__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__) && ((__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ > 0) || \ +# elif (defined (__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__) && ((__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ > 0) || \ (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ >= 4) || \ - (__GNUC__ > 3)) + (__GNUC__ > 3))) && !defined( __FreeBSD__ ) # define _STLP_NATIVE_INCLUDE_PATH ../__GNUC__.__GNUC_MINOR__.__GNUC_PATCHLEVEL__ # else # define _STLP_NATIVE_INCLUDE_PATH ../__GNUC__.__GNUC_MINOR__ --------------030003050609080706060501-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 21 03:33:14 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B368416A41B for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 03:33:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7D913C46E for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 03:33:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: (qmail 11337 invoked from network); 21 Nov 2007 03:33:14 -0000 Received: from april.chuckr.org (chuckr@[66.92.151.30]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 21 Nov 2007 03:33:14 -0000 Message-ID: <4743A6C1.2060106@chuckr.org> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 22:32:17 -0500 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071107 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: problems with linux ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 03:33:14 -0000 I sam working to try getting a current flash working, and I found something that seems screwy. I've had pr0blems with the way that ports do/don't respect LOCALBASE/X11BASE so far, and while I guess I was wrong, I think I would ask someone else to check this ... the www/linux-firefox-devel (and probably the linux-firefox) ports sticks its large selection of shared libs intoa subdir named firefox-devel, but instead of this going into /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib like I was expecting, its being stuck into /usr/local/lib. The files aren't bsd llibs, they're SYSV libs, so i dono't think that the linux ldconfig should go hunting over there. I think it's installing in the wrong spot. So I can continue with my work on the Adobe stuff, I'm going to fix my stuff here anyhow. Let me know if I'm right, ok? I'd file the PR if you wanted, I just want someone to verify this as wrong. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 21 06:30:03 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4495F16A417 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 06:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5C613C442 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 06:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAL6U3MT068678 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 06:30:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id lAL6U3Ob068673; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 06:30:03 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 06:30:03 GMT Message-Id: <200711210630.lAL6U3Ob068673@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org From: dfilter@FreeBSD.org (dfilter service) Cc: Subject: Re: ports/11854: commit references a PR X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: dfilter service List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 06:30:03 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/11854; it has been noted by GNATS. From: dfilter@FreeBSD.ORG (dfilter service) To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/11854: commit references a PR Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 06:26:08 +0000 (UTC) dhartmei 2007-11-21 06:26:00 UTC FreeBSD src repository Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_6) sys/contrib/pf/net pf.c Log: restrict the tcp.finwait timeout (45s) to state combinations where we have seen a FIN from both sides (whether ACKed or not) and use tcp.closing (900s) for half closed connections. otherwise half closed connections will time out within 45s. PR: kern/11854 Submitted by: Jan Srzednicki Approved by: re@ (kensmith@) Obtained from: OpenBSD (r1.494) Revision Changes Path 1.34.2.7 +3 -3 src/sys/contrib/pf/net/pf.c _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 21 08:12:17 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10ECD16A417 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:12:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ella.lautre.net (ella.lautre.net [80.67.160.76]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59A113C48E for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:12:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@FreeBSD.org) Received: from graf.pompo.net (graf.pompo.net [81.56.186.139]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.lautre.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECF74C2DC; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:40:56 +0100 (CET) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 80) id 1B02F11424; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:40:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from 192.54.193.52 ([192.54.193.52]) by graf.pompo.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:40:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20071121084054.r1bir95vk0848kgo@graf.pompo.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:40:54 +0100 From: Thierry Thomas To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith References: <4740FB72.5010206@math.missouri.edu> <20071119062848.GS57695@graf.pompo.net> <20071120211224.GJ85384@graf.pompo.net> <474379D0.3040702@math.missouri.edu> <47437F71.6040400@math.missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <47437F71.6040400@math.missouri.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.5) / FreeBSD-6.2 X-Originating-IP: 192.54.193.52 X-Remote-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; fr; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071025 Firefox/2.0.0.9 Cc: FreeBSD Ports List Subject: Re: stlport X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:12:17 -0000 Selon Stephen Montgomery-Smith le Mer 21 nov 01:44:33 2007 : >> It didn't build at all on my system. I am sure it is a problem >> with stlport/config/stl_gcc.h. >> >> What version of FreeBSD are you using? Did you build it with gcc or icc? > > Adding this attached file to stlport/files made it work for my system. Thanks for your feedbacks! It had been tested successfully on my dev machine (i386 / FreeBSD-7) and on tinderboxes (i386 & amd64 / FreeBSD-6 & FreeBSD-7), and I'll test it again with your patch. Regards, -- Th. Thomas. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 21 08:40:44 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6036716A420 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:40:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from redbull.bpaserver.net (redbullneu.bpaserver.net [213.198.78.217]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA85B13C4BE for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:40:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p54A57CE5.dip.t-dialin.net [84.165.124.229]) by redbull.bpaserver.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F0B2E308; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:24:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.Leidinger.net [192.168.1.102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DD575BAC; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:24:38 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=Leidinger.net; s=outgoing-alex; t=1195633479; bh=PEoVRzvj7qiHojXOlVSRaIuH/tWfXxoY1 oRat8Cm9hc=; h=Message-ID:X-Priority:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:Content-Transfer-Encoding:User-Agent; b=ENfgx2 DaBxFdn4Kvwi5n322Fjs8xTJduub7DUzswgagTs0Vid0XAR3Vt6eSQSiCAAQr5+M2w7 G/QQfNhK8YdKFddZbM/3VbVkXi3WqMZYY3WbhfRoWPZmKflpDWua/qn3BNcykvJnF8B wkg3Kx596jpIpOrivxTE80Twk10yibyzis8HZK+KF1gz/b+UD/kjP15Df2bnJ1m9iXT nryv3PCP8e7iXqM31nHjwNcMj5IbCIIE7U3OufP95LI5ybsC8XdwXfLY9iwkL8c3NVN fmcoPTKsMoXim0c0ylvuR4diiQK4NxzR9L7fbPc9eFCxyOLHpSAT8e9AJCQJ/EuVbnq w== Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.14.1/8.13.8/Submit) id lAL8Ocr4049376; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:24:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:24:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20071121092438.ihob6n73ggwkkg0w@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:24:38 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Chuck Robey References: <4743A6C1.2060106@chuckr.org> In-Reply-To: <4743A6C1.2060106@chuckr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.4) / FreeBSD-7.0 X-BPAnet-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-BPAnet-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-BPAnet-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=2.519, required 6, DKIM_SIGNED 0.00, DKIM_VERIFIED -0.00, J_CHICKENPOX_25 0.60, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE 1.82, RDNS_DYNAMIC 0.10) X-BPAnet-MailScanner-SpamScore: ss X-BPAnet-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-Spam-Status: No Cc: FreeBSD-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: problems with linux ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:40:44 -0000 Quoting Chuck Robey (from Tue, 20 Nov 2007 =20 22:32:17 -0500): > I sam working to try getting a current flash working, and I found > something that seems screwy. I've had pr0blems with the way that ports > do/don't respect LOCALBASE/X11BASE so far, and while I guess I was > wrong, I think I would ask someone else to check this ... the > www/linux-firefox-devel (and probably the linux-firefox) ports sticks > its large selection of shared libs intoa subdir named firefox-devel, > but instead of this going into /usr/compat/linux/usr/lib like I was > expecting, its being stuck into /usr/local/lib. The files aren't bsd > llibs, they're SYSV libs, so i dono't think that the linux ldconfig > should go hunting over there. And ldconfig will not hunt there, as it has to be run chrooted to =20 LINUXBASE (linux ldconfig can chroot himself). > I think it's installing in the wrong spot. So I can continue with my > work on the Adobe stuff, I'm going to fix my stuff here anyhow. Let me > know if I'm right, ok? I'd file the PR if you wanted, I just want > someone to verify this as wrong. Firefox is special, and linux emulation is special too, so the end =20 result is extra special. Firefox will look by himself into those directories, no need to ldconfig the= m. For the linux ports I suggest to not rely on your old knowledge about =20 it. I've redesigned the behavior a little bit (e.g., there's a fall =20 through to some FreeBSD config files by either symlinking to the right =20 path, or by a direct "fall trough: to the FreeBSD files). In general, infrastructure ports should go to LINUXBASE, and =20 application ports to LOCALBASE (we don't really have X11BASE in the =20 ports anymore since some months). If an application does install =20 generic infrastructure things, it should be split up so that it fits =20 the above description. If this is not possible (or too hard), we need =20 to find another solution. If it doesn't conflict with native ports =20 (for example if the infrastructure can not be used in general, as it =20 is not pick up by e.g. the native gcc or run time linker), we can =20 install it in LOCALBASE. A cleaner solution would be to put it into =20 LINUXBASE and install just a wrapper script into LOCALBASE which calls =20 the /comapt/linux/... binary. This is up to the port maintainer (he =20 can put a CONFLICTS line into the port), and maybe general consensus. =20 I haven't looked at the linux-firefox* ports, so I can't tell if it =20 would be an improvement to move it to LINUXBASE or not. Bye, Alexander. --=20 The answer to the question of Life, the Universe, and Everything is... =09Four day work week, =09Two ply toilet paper! http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID =3D B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID =3D 72077137 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 21 13:28:38 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A804F16A418 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:28:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474DA13C457 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:28:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lALDSUSw003459 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:28:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) id lALDSS6l003458; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:28:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin To: "J. Porter Clark" Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:28:27 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: tracing dependencies (Re: dependencies out of hand?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:28:38 -0000 Q: > How do you trace the dependencies? I have found this uncommonly > difficult. A: The % make all-depends-list will list the ports, that the port in the current directory depends on. or you can parse the prebuilt list in /usr/ports/INDEX-6 (or -7 depending on your OS level). Yours, -mi From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 21 14:30:09 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE61616A417 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:30:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsc@admadic.de) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C4913C465 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:30:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsc@admadic.de) X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 X-RZG-AUTH: lUESeo99iNzPSoaxNYLEYM0vFQKTxznPOmIi0KhUTW8YiUQ81L7u+QLQl0Q= Received: from srv.lpz.q-17.de.local (dslb-088-074-152-211.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.74.152.211]) by post.webmailer.de (mrclete mo58) (RZmta 14.3) with ESMTP id p04db2jALCh9ZU for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:30:07 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from: ) Received: (qmail 2484 invoked by uid 98); 21 Nov 2007 14:08:33 -0000 Received: from 192.168.40.21 by srv.lpz.q-17.de.local (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-2.01 ( Clear:RC:1(192.168.40.21):. Processed in 0.034057 secs); 21 Nov 2007 14:08:33 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.40.21?) (192.168.40.21) by srvfb.lpz.q-17.de.local with SMTP; 21 Nov 2007 14:08:32 -0000 Message-ID: <47443BE1.2080308@admadic.de> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:08:33 +0100 From: Rainer Schwarze User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Newbie: problem using SUB_LIST in Makefile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 14:30:09 -0000 Hi, I'd like to adjust a port and need to change SUB_LIST and a ./files/pkg-install.in script. I adjusted the SUB_LIST variable but the variable-replacements are not done to the appropriate files. I'll present parts of my files and ask a few questions at the end of my email. (BTW: I'm working on the port mail/qmail-scanner, my system runs on 6.2-RELEASE) This is a part of the Makefile: --8<---Makefile----- ... XWFLG=test SUB_FILES= pkg-install pkg-message SUB_LIST+= QS_USER=${QS_USER} \ QS_ID=${QS_ID} \ SPOOLDIR=${SPOOLDIR} \ XWRAPPER=${XWFLG} .include .if defined(WITH_CWRAPPER) SUB_LIST+= CWRAPPER=yes .else SUB_LIST+= CWRAPPER=no .endif ... --8<---Makefile----- My ./files/pkg-install.in looks like that: --8<---./files/pkg-install.in--- #!/bin/sh PW="/usr/sbin/pw" CHOWN="/usr/sbin/chown" CHMOD="/bin/chmod" MKDIR="/bin/mkdir -p" NOLOGIN="/usr/sbin/nologin" QS_USER=%%QS_USER%% QS_ID=%%QS_ID%% SPOOLDIR=%%SPOOLDIR%% CWRAPPER=%%CWRAPPER%% XWRAPPER=%%XWRAPPER%% ... --8<---./files/pkg-install.in--- When I run make, the resulting ./work/pkg-install looks like that: --8<---./work/pkg-install--- #!/bin/sh PW="/usr/sbin/pw" CHOWN="/usr/sbin/chown" CHMOD="/bin/chmod" MKDIR="/bin/mkdir -p" NOLOGIN="/usr/sbin/nologin" QS_USER=qscand QS_ID=98 SPOOLDIR=/var/spool/qscand CWRAPPER=%%CWRAPPER%% XWRAPPER=%%XWRAPPER%% ... --8<---./work/pkg-install--- So most of the SUB_LIST entries worked, only my ?WRAPPER entries did not. Looks a bit like I am missing a very basic detail here... Questions: 1) What could be the reason that even XWRAPPER is not handled when the replacement is performed? 2) Is my approach of adding entries to SUB_LIST based on WITH_.../WITHOUT_... correct? (Or is that impossible after including bsd.port.pre.mk? As far as I understand, the WITH_.../WITHOUT_... are available only after bsd.port.[*.]mk is included...?) Thanks and best wishes, Rainer -- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 21 16:15:39 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F04A16A418 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:15:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gorisek@e-racuni.com) Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2EA013C469 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david.gorisek@e-racuni.com) Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id b2so2208712nfb for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 08:15:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.86.87.5 with SMTP id k5mr7425153fgb.1195660284580; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:51:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.20? ( [90.157.138.120]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d4sm5089577fga.2007.11.21.07.51.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:51:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47445427.4070400@e-racuni.com> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:52:07 +0100 From: David Gorisek User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: girgen@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: postgresql-server-8.2.5_2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:15:39 -0000 Hello, is there something wrong with PostgreSQL server port? This is the error I'm getting with the latest version: ----- # portsnap extract databases/postgresql82 # make config # make ===> postgresql-server-8.2.5_2 cannot install: unknown PostgreSQL version: 82. *** Error code 1 --- Installing postgresql82-client work, but when I try installing the server I get the error above. Sorry for bothering you. Best regards, David From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 21 17:40:13 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A022116A469 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:40:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from richw@richw.org) Received: from smtp3.stanford.edu (smtp3.Stanford.EDU [171.67.20.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF6113C468 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:40:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from richw@richw.org) Received: from smtp3.stanford.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 734DB4CA59 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:19:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from whodunit.richw.org (SW-90-716-276-1.Stanford.EDU [171.66.155.243]) by smtp3.stanford.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601A54C7E2 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:19:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost.richw.org [127.0.0.1]) by whodunit.richw.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16756331092 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:19:22 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at richw.org Received: from whodunit.richw.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (whodunit.richw.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KhA57jOZyvWW for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:19:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.31.66.5] (iknow.richw.org [172.31.66.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "rde-richw-3.stanford.edu", Issuer "richw.org" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: richw) by whodunit.richw.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60AF330814; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:19:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47446898.90408@rde-richw-3.stanford.edu> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:19:20 -0800 From: Rich Wales User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ume@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: cyrus-imapd-2.3.9_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:40:13 -0000 Hi. Does a port of Cyrus 2.3.10 exist yet? Or are you aware of any issues with 2.3.10 under FreeBSD for which patches might exist? I'm running Cyrus on a FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE system. I need to upgrade from 2.3.9 to 2.3.10 because I want to use replication but am running into stability problems with the replication code in 2.3.9. I tried building 2.3.10 from sources, using the same configuration options as in my 2.3.9 build from the port. I added one patch from the Info-Cyrus list, relating to getgrouplist() calls, but otherwise used the 2.3.10 source "as is". The resulting 2.3.10 build suffered from problems with "ctl_cyrusdb -c" hanging, and other mail delivery attempts hanging (or timing out) and piling up in my Postfix queue. I had to restart Cyrus frequently in order to clear these logjams. Eventually, I gave up and went back to 2.3.9, but I can't stay there indefinitely because I need replication to work more solidly than it does in 2.3.9. Are you aware of any issues which might cause this sort of instability with 2.3.10? If I can't find out (or figure out) what is going on, I'll probably have to move Cyrus off my FreeBSD box and put it on something like Ubuntu, where 2.3.10 appears to run without problems. -- Rich Wales === Palo Alto, CA, USA === richw@richw.org http://www.richw.org === http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Richwales From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 21 20:14:22 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C6E16A41A for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:14:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7EB2613C467 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:14:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 10693 invoked by uid 399); 21 Nov 2007 20:14:19 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 21 Nov 2007 20:14:19 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <47449199.5000403@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:14:17 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scot Hetzel References: <4740E430.9050901@chuckr.org> <20071119031336.GA73804@k7.mavetju> <790a9fff0711190042x73cd231cqbd643c39be2bd767@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0711190042x73cd231cqbd643c39be2bd767@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chuck Robey , FreeBSD-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:14:23 -0000 Scot Hetzel wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 08:17:36PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: >>> activate the port, and if so, the port would add a line of the form >>> 'portname_enable="YES"', and this would make your new port operate. >>> Well, it seems from what I see of my new system, that this is no longer >>> the case. I could understand (and approve of) ports not being allowed >>> to modify any /etc/contents, but howcome ports can't use this rather >>> obvious workaround? > Edwin is correct that ports never had this behavior when they were > converted to the rc_ng startup script style, It's not "next generation" anymore, can we refer to it as rc.d instead please? :) As for Chuck's suggestion, I have for some time wanted to add support to rc.subr for a /usr/local/etc/rc.conf.d so that ports could install sensible defaults for rc.conf, and delete them when they are deinstalled. There was some objection to this idea on the freebsd-rc list when I suggested it though so I haven't pursued it. (I don't remember off hand what the objection was.) My idea is pretty simple, rc.subr already has support for /etc/rc.conf.d which allows for files with the same name as the name= attribute in the rc.d script to specify the settings for that service. I'd like to expand this to a local version that ports could write to on install. I think it would also be good to add an OPTION for "start on boot," which the user can enable before the _enable option is actually set to yes by the port. We can flesh this out in more detail if people are interested. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 21 20:20:51 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDAED16A41A for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:20:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (lefty.soaustin.net [66.135.55.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D3E13C45D for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:20:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from bighuge.lonesome.com (cpe-66-68-146-180.austin.res.rr.com [66.68.146.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33FAA8C0C9; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:59:43 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon Organization: FreeBSD.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:59:56 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <474106CB.9060700@math.missouri.edu> <20071119.132430.232757505.chat95@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20071119.132430.232757505.chat95@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711210759.56913.linimon@FreeBSD.org> Cc: stephen@math.missouri.edu, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: octave-forge on FreeBSD 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 20:20:51 -0000 On Sunday 18 November 2007, Maho NAKATA wrote: > > How about doing something more simple like: > > > > .if ${OSVERSION} >= 700042 > > USE_GCC= 3.4 > > .endif > > > > which works great in my situation. I'd rather see USE_GCC set unconditionally, so that INDEX will be the same on 6 and 7. Is there any hope of the software being updated? My concern is that once we set this, we'll tend to forget about it later. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 01:24:10 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A4C16A473 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:24:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QP=6d91388d@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BD813C461 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:24:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QP=6d91388d@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F297163F82 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:51:15 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74B1FD0501 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:50:14 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:50:11 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071122005011.07bad587@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <47449199.5000403@FreeBSD.org> References: <4740E430.9050901@chuckr.org> <20071119031336.GA73804@k7.mavetju> <790a9fff0711190042x73cd231cqbd643c39be2bd767@mail.gmail.com> <47449199.5000403@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:24:10 -0000 On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:14:17 -0800 Doug Barton wrote: > > ... I have for some time wanted to add support > to rc.subr for a /usr/local/etc/rc.conf.d so that ports could install > sensible defaults for rc.conf, What's the advantage of doing that over having the the defaults in the rc.d script, which is generally what happens now for scripts installed by ports. It would allow a port to install variant defaults, but that sounds very confusing. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 07:16:00 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2831716A41A for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:16:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C78B513C448 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 30068 invoked by uid 399); 22 Nov 2007 06:49:01 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2007 06:49:01 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <4745265B.2050407@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:48:59 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: RW References: <4740E430.9050901@chuckr.org> <20071119031336.GA73804@k7.mavetju> <790a9fff0711190042x73cd231cqbd643c39be2bd767@mail.gmail.com> <47449199.5000403@FreeBSD.org> <20071122005011.07bad587@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20071122005011.07bad587@gumby.homeunix.com.> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:16:00 -0000 RW wrote: > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:14:17 -0800 > Doug Barton wrote: > >> ... I have for some time wanted to add support >> to rc.subr for a /usr/local/etc/rc.conf.d so that ports could install >> sensible defaults for rc.conf, > > What's the advantage of doing that over having the the defaults > in the rc.d script, I thought I explained that. The point of this thread was that services installed by ports are not (any longer?) on by default. What I'm proposing is a way to allow the user to choose to enable the service using an OPTION (amongst other things). Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 07:20:18 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1902716A419 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:20:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB08A13C4CE for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:20:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l8so2133142nzf for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 23:19:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5ou2JVnWQoEcldTSeNr+OYr+nJflRpX0/ttrst+ekqI=; b=bCPSrSJukVlop+4dJSBihtmxVGcwidh8HqDzSSdVHTZZuKqdG9QR6mFcspiStZd6VAnjs4+8AVa8GAUIGL2ziTyQrKrmeKSphWBBDzwTV5ydhIcLgOadWlOtmSiKcxwgshO7L6x0R2dfmN4RUby9vQCCQ1B0aWsKlhy8h95hCjw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=NTpV3t7SWy1aH8ZwKzPdijpJQhbcrbST5T4SPR4L+ai0x0YKCVUctiHkM+xaFf2tWF/Y+amx4PAZZ7Wl+zKKgm3FbPF4Ffvq9LUfDVurrbLRrAg0Ki72Q7fou8KKEyoKVgFpUZRq7eWPvaVSoXeFmWIUvYv7I9MC59HcZ/zP+Zg= Received: by 10.64.199.2 with SMTP id w2mr18912802qbf.1195714317790; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:51:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.2.2? ( [67.85.89.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c5sm512663qbc.2007.11.21.22.51.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:51:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <47452703.1020008@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:51:47 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071120) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Backhaus References: <474288AE.1040106@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: who do I report this to? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:20:18 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 > > The first thing to do is to make sure it is not your ISP inflicting you with > some slowdown. Connect a second node to the re interface (put a switch > between you and the modem, and connect something else to it) and see > if your connection speed to that local machine is affected. > If not, then it is your isp that is the problem. Change ISPs to a legitimate > one. I guess you don't read -current it is a confirmed re(4) issue (plus some other things but the ISP has nothing to do with it) - -- Aryeh M. Friedman Developer, not business, friendly http://www.flosoft-systems.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHRScDJ9+1V27SttsRAlJDAJ9RkHvocRj6Eiw+rqyQQq+fx37e7ACglwmI xfNQ7Und4cZRHAGFerHGI+Y= =w0id -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 07:20:44 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E973F16A417; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:20:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu) Received: from marvin.harmless.hu (marvin.harmless.hu [195.56.55.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA00313C457; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:20:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu) Received: from localhost (marvin-mail [192.168.0.2]) by marvin.harmless.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84ED07C0095; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:20:08 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.4.2 (20060627) (Debian) at harmless.hu Received: from marvin.harmless.hu ([192.168.0.2]) by localhost (marvin.harmless.hu [192.168.0.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fwSSKgbbkoaw; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:20:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from marvin.harmless.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by marvin.harmless.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C58C7C0067; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:20:06 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:20:06 +0100 From: Gergely CZUCZY To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20071122072006.GA22956@harmless.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=x-unknown; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4745265B.2050407@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Cc: RW , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:20:45 -0000 --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 10:48:59PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > RW wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:14:17 -0800 > > Doug Barton wrote: > >=20 > >> ... I have for some time wanted to add support > >> to rc.subr for a /usr/local/etc/rc.conf.d so that ports could install > >> sensible defaults for rc.conf,=20 > >=20 > > What's the advantage of doing that over having the the defaults > > in the rc.d script,=20 >=20 > I thought I explained that. The point of this thread was that services > installed by ports are not (any longer?) on by default. What I'm > proposing is a way to allow the user to choose to enable the service > using an OPTION (amongst other things). echo 'sevice_enable=3D"YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf.local done. Sincerely, Gergely Czuczy mailto: gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu --=20 Weenies test. Geniuses solve problems that arise. --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) owF1VM9r1EAUrlUPRop4E1R49FLFTTbZdvsjtT+wrbUH22ILq3iQ2eRtdiQ7E2cm 266CFxU8SJEKHvRQLx6LgoIg+C949+bfIHj3TbKt9WAgycyb977vve+95OXQ8YHB s98/fr575cXu22P7Jy42r3RyY0TidpjqcuEGvh+4tdpUfdytu6PBaL2F6AetIBiP 2cTykvt+QQqDwribvQxDMLhtqlnKuJiGqM2URjOTm5Y76Rz4LXKdSc0NlyIELlIu 8PBsUzGhW6jcJRHJmIskhAe5NBi7meLCsGaKjrMmoIFxBVZlF2pBBWq+PwHMQOCH Y5NhfWr9Jrj+pO9XYFHmCVxjykgBW4pwQmcWbjX+rmfhAKwWlHgWK6iFwVgYTJQw hdtRpKsxbZrz1xXitY1FT6pk9gjiTK2ImAXP8+B/1wq0WRehJRVo2UEwnB5bjESI wUhgcQw6zzKpTIlFNhV5Om+qIoZBNdeqmsqIpVU0UZUOIylaHoVJMG0Sw8ZqiGSe xiSyNixNSyiNQnPSEWJssTwlJ4vYB6j0s++/oEFQI5oQkXLqUn4sQZAtiCX1piSS XVS2mtKAxX2IXYBwURiJgtKLFM9MSVOSrNAh6dk2tMLtYnKsCATtwSaFZURlLKdp c5uJQhaTVLpk10hDGqEl6ldJwc1ev3ymEIQ0cImJHqRSJKjmLgO1kDz6KXpFjbAy 0iGITEk7mlQJUTFi6RXdSFO5VZSQE521RG0pNdoVCjuTxWE/FYLJCwgmYG19c2Vt leg7xK2pCvJTthDaXfYcJBwY0WjD7pVIM6OLw3eWNoZHbKv+aW3RbMeJpUDPcTa4 iFBh2qs4zjKqhFaw8DCPHvacDuOpkSEkpdmLCvM8fYudFLX22rnjuK4Vv4EoOJKS qEmHZdpQgZpGKKXZJC0on05fZ6a4Jt7nc8dPDtiP/uCPcXbw8f7A3sKPPXbh59dv jxpPHrw6f+P59Ov7vwfe7ew+Xd05vXP72a8vb07tDn049yk58wc= =YfHb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --X1bOJ3K7DJ5YkBrT-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 07:31:22 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA9F16A418 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:31:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: from ella.lautre.net (ella.lautre.net [80.67.160.76]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4E2F13C4CC for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:31:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: from graf.pompo.net (graf.pompo.net [81.56.186.139]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.lautre.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2187926C591; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:23:26 +0100 (CET) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0F72611424; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:23:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 21:23:24 +0100 From: Thierry Thomas To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith Message-ID: <20071121202324.GW89927@graf.pompo.net> Mail-Followup-To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith , FreeBSD Ports List References: <4740FB72.5010206@math.missouri.edu> <20071119062848.GS57695@graf.pompo.net> <20071120211224.GJ85384@graf.pompo.net> <474379D0.3040702@math.missouri.edu> <47437F71.6040400@math.missouri.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47437F71.6040400@math.missouri.edu> X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc; y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-BETA2 i386 Organization: Kabbale Eros X-PGP: 0xC71405A2 Cc: FreeBSD Ports List Subject: Re: stlport X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:31:23 -0000 --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Mer 21 nov 07 =E0 1:44:33 +0100, Stephen Montgomery-Smith =E9crivait=A0: > >It didn't build at all on my system. I am sure it is a problem with=20 > >stlport/config/stl_gcc.h. > > > >What version of FreeBSD are you using? Did you build it with gcc or icc? >=20 > Adding this attached file to stlport/files made it work for my system. Could you please check that my patch provided you the file files/patch-stlport_stl_config_host.h? This config/host.h is the way to handle this kind of specificities and should give the same result that your patch. Regards, --=20 Th. Thomas. --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHRJO8c95pjMcUBaIRAipQAJ9ddb1r82FmjFOzsBXvmTkrc3iAxgCfYQL0 3FOapnxdFYC+opAGjmatH3I= =NA+t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 07:54:53 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0350316A417 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:54:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robbak@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2B913C47E for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:54:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robbak@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u77so8211361pyb for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 23:54:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=N55VhtheVIol9qmWwsP6GGDFmk+LPZMQ6zPHVYZrsvo=; b=dchweG+SJ26ak44TnE72T2T36lEWOeA7zmGkCLw2QfXYqNpvluWj2h8koHAPNkm1v36zfFnvsvr+9KF07GYYwDC+CbOkj/HdDNkrsg1Rqwz2tABKUUrOb4Ke3UzOIbt0F2+j0P6NreGG/tzwm5Hm/y9vNIbOzn5+0lR9h7JOFjQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=a6KSoawMaVJ4QFGEPswyJONrrxVnzHLEHjS1UK/XY/6wr5HHGPSoe9lu5ABsnN0ZaaomxxcvnC9PP8kwKZqZc0QpokVA9Oao1Dqpo3yB7vIrOeoVN4nqlW+s5CNBXYc8WM4Aa7i8cMnmYrUUYngFDZASstnWE98YVY49uP0+GEc= Received: by 10.65.233.16 with SMTP id k16mr18871769qbr.1195714192472; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:49:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.249.17 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:49:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 16:49:52 +1000 From: "Robert Backhaus" Sender: robbak@gmail.com To: "Aryeh M. Friedman" In-Reply-To: <474288AE.1040106@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <474288AE.1040106@gmail.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: bd94d57942691187 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Questions , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: who do I report this to? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:54:53 -0000 On Nov 20, 2007 5:11 PM, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Who do I report the following issue to (it falls into at least 3 camps)? > > If I am downloading a torrent in deluge 0.5.6.2_1 *AND* am logged into > gmail (*WITH* a chat open) my network connection looses about 90% of > it's capacity (for all applications), re(4) with the following: > > rgephy0: PHY 1 on miibus0 > rgephy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, > 1000baseT-FDX, auto > > After some experimenting this problem *only* occurs under the above > conditions. > > Addtional info: > --snip-- The first thing to do is to make sure it is not your ISP inflicting you with some slowdown. Connect a second node to the re interface (put a switch between you and the modem, and connect something else to it) and see if your connection speed to that local machine is affected. If not, then it is your isp that is the problem. Change ISPs to a legitimate one. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 08:02:10 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F91C16A469 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redmail@cauchy.math.missouri.edu) Received: from cauchy.math.missouri.edu (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE4F13C46E for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redmail@cauchy.math.missouri.edu) Received: from cauchy.math.missouri.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cauchy.math.missouri.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lALLqrcP088634 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:52:53 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from redmail@cauchy.math.missouri.edu) Received: (from redmail@localhost) by cauchy.math.missouri.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id lALLqrST088633 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:52:53 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from redmail) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:52:53 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith To: FreeBSD Ports List Message-ID: <20071121215253.GC88565@cauchy.math.missouri.edu> References: <4740FB72.5010206@math.missouri.edu> <20071119062848.GS57695@graf.pompo.net> <20071120211224.GJ85384@graf.pompo.net> <474379D0.3040702@math.missouri.edu> <47437F71.6040400@math.missouri.edu> <20071121202324.GW89927@graf.pompo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071121202324.GW89927@graf.pompo.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: stlport X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:02:10 -0000 On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 09:23:24PM +0100, Thierry Thomas wrote: > Le Mer 21 nov 07 ? 1:44:33 +0100, Stephen Montgomery-Smith > ?crivait?: > > > >It didn't build at all on my system. I am sure it is a problem with > > >stlport/config/stl_gcc.h. > > > > > >What version of FreeBSD are you using? Did you build it with gcc or icc? > > > > Adding this attached file to stlport/files made it work for my system. > > Could you please check that my patch provided you the file > files/patch-stlport_stl_config_host.h? This config/host.h is the way to > handle this kind of specificities and should give the same result that > your patch. > Now that you mention it, I can see it in the diff file that you sent me. How do you get patch to behave properly when the file it diffs against doesn't already exist? From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 08:11:04 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4A116A420 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:11:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC94513C4EA for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:10:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 26724 invoked by uid 399); 22 Nov 2007 07:43:37 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2007 07:43:37 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <47453327.7010305@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 23:43:35 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gergely CZUCZY References: <20071122072006.GA22956@harmless.hu> In-Reply-To: <20071122072006.GA22956@harmless.hu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: RW , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:11:04 -0000 Gergely CZUCZY wrote: > echo 'sevice_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf.local Yes, I think we all know how to go about this manually. The question at hand is whether or not it's possible or desirable to create the possibility of doing it for the user at port install time. If what you're trying to say here is that you don't find such a facility interesting or necessary, thanks for stating your opinion. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 08:38:47 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999DB16A41B for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:38:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maho.nakata@gmail.com) Received: from rv-out-0910.google.com (rv-out-0910.google.com [209.85.198.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80FB913C46A for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:38:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maho.nakata@gmail.com) Received: by rv-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l15so2364711rvb for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:38:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.251.1 with SMTP id y1mr3640982rvh.1195689286424; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:54:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ( [134.160.214.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k34sm49166rvb.2007.11.21.15.54.42 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 15:54:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:54:31 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20071122.085431.129774588.chat95@mac.com> To: linimon@FreeBSD.org From: Maho NAKATA In-Reply-To: <200711210759.56913.linimon@FreeBSD.org> References: <474106CB.9060700@math.missouri.edu> <20071119.132430.232757505.chat95@mac.com> <200711210759.56913.linimon@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.2 on Emacs 22.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: Maho NAKATA Cc: stephen@math.missouri.edu, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: octave-forge on FreeBSD 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:38:47 -0000 From: Mark Linimon Subject: Re: octave-forge on FreeBSD 7.0 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 07:59:56 -0600 > I'd rather see USE_GCC set unconditionally, so that INDEX will > be the same on 6 and 7. Me too. > Is there any hope of the software being updated? My concern is > that once we set this, we'll tend to forget about it later. Yes. IMHO, octave-forge should be merged into octave itself, and relese version of octave and corrsponding octave-forge is old. I think this is a temporal situation. Once octave will be updated octave-forge will also be updated, and I believe octave-forge will be built with gcc42. Thanks, -- Nakata Maho (maho@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 08:38:58 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B7EB16A41B for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:38:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA0D113C4DD for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:38:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 881 invoked by uid 399); 22 Nov 2007 08:38:44 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.4?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2007 08:38:44 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:38:41 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton To: "Jason C. Wells" In-Reply-To: <474262D5.3010603@highperformance.net> Message-ID: References: <474262D5.3010603@highperformance.net> User-Agent: Alpine 0.99999 (BSF 796 2007-11-08) X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0xD5B2F0FB Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Package Building in the Large X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:38:58 -0000 On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jason C. Wells wrote: > What I am trying to do is to build 30 or so packages including the big ones > like X, kde, gnome, plus all of their dependencies on a build host and then > use pkg_add on various machines. I have had a variety of difficulties with > all of the methods I have used thus far (portmaster, portupgrade, homegrown). What problems did you have with portmaster? Did the backup package creation fail in some way? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 08:40:30 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C82516A419; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:40:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu) Received: from marvin.harmless.hu (marvin.harmless.hu [195.56.55.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 005F213C4D1; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:40:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu) Received: from localhost (marvin-mail [192.168.0.2]) by marvin.harmless.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2857BFFC8; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:40:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.4.2 (20060627) (Debian) at harmless.hu Received: from marvin.harmless.hu ([192.168.0.2]) by localhost (marvin.harmless.hu [192.168.0.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YnGFKgBkvHJB; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:40:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from marvin.harmless.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by marvin.harmless.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C5A7BFCC1; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:40:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:40:02 +0100 From: Gergely CZUCZY To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20071122084002.GA31823@harmless.hu> References: <20071122072006.GA22956@harmless.hu> <47453327.7010305@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=x-unknown; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47453327.7010305@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Cc: RW , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:40:30 -0000 --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 11:43:35PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Gergely CZUCZY wrote: >=20 > > echo 'sevice_enable=3D"YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf.local >=20 > Yes, I think we all know how to go about this manually. The question > at hand is whether or not it's possible or desirable to create the > possibility of doing it for the user at port install time. >=20 > If what you're trying to say here is that you don't find such a > facility interesting or necessary, thanks for stating your opinion. I said, that this can be done from the Makefile as well, if that OPTIONS of yours is enabled. Sincerely, Gergely Czuczy mailto: gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu --=20 Weenies test. Geniuses solve problems that arise. --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) owE9Uz1vEzEYLlQwnMTQX8CrMkSod9dLUkoV1FBoqypDP6QGVSkDcnzv5azc2cH2 JVxnhBg6AGJBlUBih3bgPyAWxMLCytoZMTDwOmk6nHSyn/f5sv3qxuzM1bnvZ18e Lxy/ObnyaTbuLuSFtbIX5EwPhQyqUVQN6tWVWj1YCpaWkXUZi5bjhNd4Ut3aXGPr SlqUNmiXA2yAxWd2cZAxIe8BT5k2aFcLmwQr3hS3IcxAGWGFkg0QMhMSL/famkmT oA42JVexkL0GPC2UxTgYaCEt62boebsSDjD2YUcNoVb1oRZFd4FZqFYbS/VG/c7e NgTRShT5sKGKHjxk2ioJI008Da8JW6h7mJWwfvho/bBzub5ai2izCchTBRWDQ8Hx CUonuVrfmO9s7s9XoNmERbR8UfOQK5mEmeIsm8520PjQApsK2YcRAssy6Es1gpQ+ q6CngHVVYR3CQM5kQYgyhHaKlBKNa4RoKEnKZAyEGaVoU9SgNEhlQdiKAerOCDLl FmM0QjuHjp5rZJb+UiSSCUpkwpagEogVdUnzkNAUIaAwREtKA6WJVxrrzFqRYzhN 00pInhClKiqaaHXpKEjHsBLIFDqD9gJBArJC7IJ8m4KnwIghYXxigE6O8JSPCFwU 5GgM06Xv5mXfjF2RhTGA2CjwQEhqI/RaJCdifyI07o0zCV10ggiJVvk4zjbrYyKo B0alYZb5IJLJzO5eu7W7s+9RCY7ZONeTU41Dz9sXkpO1rPQ97/JeHBX8qPRyJjKr GtCbLId8vLxGVzrPyH6YFp4XBK6rA0QpkMqgiCFdLymoXQNGZUOEgVaklV9UxbQw VPHL+7PXZtzbmT68uavPP8+89wdvP948XQh+na2dDz98ff3u9/GDmZPrfvfg9s/l 84735++L0+LWj2//zv4D =Vhpj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5vNYLRcllDrimb99-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 08:55:34 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61E816A494; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu) Received: from marvin.harmless.hu (marvin.harmless.hu [195.56.55.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA6A13C4D5; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu) Received: from localhost (marvin-mail [192.168.0.2]) by marvin.harmless.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6627BFEFE; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:55:16 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.4.2 (20060627) (Debian) at harmless.hu Received: from marvin.harmless.hu ([192.168.0.2]) by localhost (marvin.harmless.hu [192.168.0.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zOhzE2QP86e8; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:55:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from marvin.harmless.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by marvin.harmless.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39BC47BFEDF; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:55:14 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:55:14 +0100 From: Gergely CZUCZY To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20071122085514.GA33374@harmless.hu> References: <20071122072006.GA22956@harmless.hu> <47453327.7010305@FreeBSD.org> <20071122084002.GA31823@harmless.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=x-unknown; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r804 (FreeBSD) Cc: RW , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:55:34 -0000 --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 12:43:50AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Gergely CZUCZY wrote: >=20 > >>Gergely CZUCZY wrote: > >> > >>>echo 'sevice_enable=3D"YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf.local >=20 > >I said, that this can be done from the Makefile as well, if that OPTIONS > >of yours is enabled. >=20 > But that would violate the principle that ports shouldn't touch files in = /etc. =66rom rc.conf(5): first: The file /etc/rc.conf.local is used to override settings in /etc/rc.conf for historical reasons. See the rc_conf_files variable below. second: rc_conf_files (str) This option is used to specify a list of files that will override the settings in /etc/defaults/rc.conf. The files will be read in the order in which they are specified and should include the full path to the file. By default, the files specified are /etc/rc.conf and /etc/rc.conf.local So, extend rc_conf_files with /usr/local/etc/rc.conf, that's an acceptable extension IMO, and you're done. ports can touch that. Though, IMO ports could touch the .local files, regardless it's in /etc/. That's why it's rc.conf_.local_ . Anyways, I'm not a core member, it was just a point of view. Sincerely, Gergely Czuczy mailto: gergely.czuczy@harmless.hu --=20 Weenies test. Geniuses solve problems that arise. --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) owF1VT2MG1UQPhJB8SSKSNRhSOOE7K599uXuspEPcj+KDnE5JBtFCYX1bnfW++D5 vc17b232KiSEFAkKRAlSKkqQKNLQgURFARItBTQUVEhUVIh5u7ZzJwcXlu/NzDff zHwz9+mLF9cuXPrpmyfvXP/ksy+e+/qFl06uT0rn1DiccDMVKlzvdNbDXq+3tRFu hpvYvYndDb5+c3s7623hnYO9v/e0cqhcOKwKjMHh+65dSC7ULUhybiy6fumycJst /PaFLbQVTmgVg1BSKFzahoYrm6EJD1SiU6HGMTwstcM0LIxQjp9IZOxYwTAvA7ir p9DtBtDtdLaAO1jvxhu9+Ebn9hGEne1OJ4B9XY5hlxunFcwM4cRsBxbh3W6DQNEB 3EEzRlnB3oO39x7cXzr3ux2K2Nn5HzNZ6q8dTHINLYtTkeAIlefZ7+1fuX8wuNIi O7TRJW2TRIlWWSR1wuUS+xAsF2kALqcSXC4sJFzBCUKqFUJm9IReEY74e5gJicAt zFDKAETWxBy/NTw8vjvwWDqDSpfGAqE0LNJokWi3dI3/TJcyhanQkjussX1vE1FI bBwKbZwFm3s/1aIoXSY5+OQErKDPfDUR629uenLzqq7euBYzlgljXcyGBFqTXa2b qDHwn9JiStCgp2iMSBFIKY4mXuc4GweZNkB9cdoID2CQW61sBDBAbLB8ESYZee9R w3PKjfD1UyOlnkWMMYtkTuMm4Jxz83T2c9U6c41UQm3UhReqb+iCsC0wEVkFHCSR Aup5k9L3bhVqJqR8WqMnulJnihkvpbPLRgGlxlWoJk0NSPKgNqQewkNqk6Lxf8xy QaOiJ6JncE5VYLoKxlU6HzHFJbKck8tKQi+4y32lbj5GIrRbwZxmsIq18LNPE9bp z03RJ3zGGrCBDoBuBpL5/Ahngli0S2vatefZ2GZbWpZAgScJFs1lqGGsH9fh0XFQ Z6R1aJlml6K5sP16NZL2ICSNIbVhnAc+aOFS92XhhDCXbs0roM6PuUnpJ43Qk1jM MSKkmtUsrxrLnO6oiR8BJbutqhmvCOWwNQGlHcko0cRwgpMTNLTVtKC04u+W1psK TVfPS2wq0Kt4QLNCQ5coYGx5k07L5LRiEy6k0zGMm+coqZ9fpxM88VSjvGQsDP0t uIeohBcsWhfR5VOCpE2z03Lqb4GmVk4aOdMUhcWIPXrt4vNr/tYv/lFcuvDyz2uP o4/EP/d++/fz7IdX3/jzlx+//OC78MO1x71Hlz/+43K1n3/71+9Hb/76/SunXz35 Dw== =uoZm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 09:07:59 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB73516A481; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:07:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (lefty.soaustin.net [66.135.55.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129AD13C4CC; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:07:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 762C58C0EC; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:11:23 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:11:23 -0600 To: Maho NAKATA Message-ID: <20071122081123.GA23167@soaustin.net> References: <474106CB.9060700@math.missouri.edu> <20071119.132430.232757505.chat95@mac.com> <200711210759.56913.linimon@FreeBSD.org> <20071122.085431.129774588.chat95@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071122.085431.129774588.chat95@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) Cc: stephen@math.missouri.edu, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, linimon@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: octave-forge on FreeBSD 7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:08:00 -0000 > IMHO, octave-forge should be merged into octave itself, > and relese version of octave and corrsponding octave-forge is old. > I think this is a temporal situation. Once octave will be updated > octave-forge will also be updated, and I believe octave-forge > will be built with gcc42. OK, in that case, approved. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 09:10:52 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA9A16A419 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:10:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2A7F913C4DB for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:10:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 7393 invoked by uid 399); 22 Nov 2007 08:43:53 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.4?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2007 08:43:53 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:43:50 -0800 (PST) From: Doug Barton To: Gergely CZUCZY In-Reply-To: <20071122084002.GA31823@harmless.hu> Message-ID: References: <20071122072006.GA22956@harmless.hu> <47453327.7010305@FreeBSD.org> <20071122084002.GA31823@harmless.hu> User-Agent: Alpine 0.99999 (BSF 796 2007-11-08) X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 0xD5B2F0FB Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: RW , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:10:52 -0000 On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Gergely CZUCZY wrote: >> Gergely CZUCZY wrote: >> >>> echo 'sevice_enable="YES"' >> /etc/rc.conf.local > I said, that this can be done from the Makefile as well, if that OPTIONS > of yours is enabled. But that would violate the principle that ports shouldn't touch files in /etc. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 09:29:56 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872E216A476 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ella.lautre.net (ella.lautre.net [80.67.160.76]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4301913C4D5 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thierry@FreeBSD.org) Received: from graf.pompo.net (graf.pompo.net [81.56.186.139]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.lautre.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 981964C339; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:29:42 +0100 (CET) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 80) id 5088411424; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:29:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from 192.54.193.52 ([192.54.193.52]) by graf.pompo.net (Horde MIME library) with HTTP; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:29:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20071122102940.yg6bd25cxwgwosog@graf.pompo.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:29:40 +0100 From: Thierry Thomas To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith References: <4740FB72.5010206@math.missouri.edu> <20071119062848.GS57695@graf.pompo.net> <20071120211224.GJ85384@graf.pompo.net> <474379D0.3040702@math.missouri.edu> <47437F71.6040400@math.missouri.edu> <20071121202324.GW89927@graf.pompo.net> <20071121215253.GC88565@cauchy.math.missouri.edu> In-Reply-To: <20071121215253.GC88565@cauchy.math.missouri.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.1.5) / FreeBSD-6.2 X-Originating-IP: 192.54.193.52 X-Remote-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; fr; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071025 Firefox/2.0.0.9 Cc: FreeBSD Ports List Subject: Re: stlport X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 09:29:56 -0000 Selon Stephen Montgomery-Smith le Mer 21 nov 22:52:53 2007 : > Now that you mention it, I can see it in the diff file that you sent me. > > How do you get patch to behave properly when the file it diffs > against doesn't > already exist? If you `cd /usr/ports', patch -p0 < /tmp/stlport.diff should apply everything. Ajust -p0 (-p1, etc.) if you run it from another dir. Regards, -- Th. Thomas. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 10:54:24 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590CF16A476 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chifeng@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3736013C45B for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chifeng@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so3282935waf for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:54:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.195.19 with SMTP id s19mr1512432waf.1195701896218; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:24:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.94.8 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:24:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:24:56 +0800 From: chifeng To: FreeBSD-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Please help me update extmail/extman ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:54:24 -0000 Hi, committer boss. I sent 2 PRs: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118181 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118180 Please help me commit. Thanks ! -- regards. chifeng From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 14:06:47 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D1D16A41B; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:06:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from cauchy.math.missouri.edu (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B0A13C461; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:06:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Received: from laptop2.gateway.2wire.net (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by cauchy.math.missouri.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAME6S8U093490; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:06:29 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from stephen@math.missouri.edu) Message-ID: <47458CE9.7090806@math.missouri.edu> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:06:33 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071118 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thierry Thomas References: <4740FB72.5010206@math.missouri.edu> <20071119062848.GS57695@graf.pompo.net> <20071120211224.GJ85384@graf.pompo.net> <474379D0.3040702@math.missouri.edu> <47437F71.6040400@math.missouri.edu> <20071121202324.GW89927@graf.pompo.net> <20071121215253.GC88565@cauchy.math.missouri.edu> <20071122102940.yg6bd25cxwgwosog@graf.pompo.net> In-Reply-To: <20071122102940.yg6bd25cxwgwosog@graf.pompo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports List Subject: Re: stlport X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 14:06:47 -0000 Thierry Thomas wrote: > Selon Stephen Montgomery-Smith le Mer 21 nov > 22:52:53 2007 : > >> Now that you mention it, I can see it in the diff file that you sent me. >> >> How do you get patch to behave properly when the file it diffs >> against doesn't >> already exist? > > If you `cd /usr/ports', > > patch -p0 < /tmp/stlport.diff > > should apply everything. Ajust -p0 (-p1, etc.) if you run it from > another dir. > > Regards, It seems to be working. Sorry for the noise. Stephen From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 15:07:06 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E915816A468 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:07:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: from mu-out-0910.google.com (mu-out-0910.google.com [209.85.134.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCEB13C467 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:07:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grafan@gmail.com) Received: by mu-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id i10so3442982mue for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:06:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=sLnpaAv23Mvun/RSnFeR0hdq7TXRMBVEP6TI8L5JvUI=; b=oX1QufAowWnFUiqFi8xbo4H69K5byudnKNGoc/+eu7GxkxS6LGmg1dSv9lxvlt58plj3iCuL3a7a/vRwjGgc9tujP9HhEwxtgEKI1zXV1Hp2TVNof2VNsZMt5FM3dbMnM54AdNuBlvgeR028QlC2kocZD3nheQ7r/uOQmti/Na4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=tXtBjji7kQ4I+QZxHtSnCkYJ60Kyey76ozsO8LNIso0XPADfUT93HV9zhtNFlpHWv4fsEgtdygCBre1CCC98jaI5YayVQ4wy7Mv+01BZAu1GU6sbMrepWavTZ7SdMuWt796FTKHle7NUlXw/cW33Xu9MZLFIX5dYDE16PppPVEA= Received: by 10.82.140.20 with SMTP id n20mr23493695bud.1195742310029; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 06:38:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.82.115.11 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 06:38:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6eb82e0711220638l7c5fba64k23c730b2af9c6a79@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 22:38:29 +0800 From: "Rong-en Fan" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: if you see undefined symbol '__mb_sb_limit' on 6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:07:07 -0000 The ctype fix for UTF-8 locale unfortunately introduced some new symbols to libc. Therefore, binaries built on system with that fix can not be used on older system. For that sake, the fix is back-out for 6-STABLE. If you see undefined symbols '__mb_sb_limit', please rebuild the affected binary. Everything will be fine then. Binaries built between 20071025 and 20071030 will be affected by this. Sorry for the inconvenience. Regards, Rong-En Fan From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 15:13:25 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A64516A419; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:13:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (dsl081-163-122.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.163.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCE5513C45A; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:13:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from w16.stradamotorsports.com (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAMFD5K1060911; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:13:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <47459C80.8000206@highperformance.net> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 07:13:04 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070922) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <474262D5.3010603@highperformance.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=failed version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on s4.stradamotorsports.com Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Package Building in the Large X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:13:25 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jason C. Wells wrote: > >> What I am trying to do is to build 30 or so packages including the >> big ones like X, kde, gnome, plus all of their dependencies on a >> build host and then use pkg_add on various machines. I have had a >> variety of difficulties with all of the methods I have used thus far >> (portmaster, portupgrade, homegrown). > > What problems did you have with portmaster? Did the backup package > creation fail in some way? > Not all dependencies had a package built for them. For my list of 31 ports that I actually desired to build there was a dependency list (make all-depends-list) of 758 ports. Of those 758 ports there were 427 packages built. I also ended up with shared a library version problem in at least one port (grip) in spite of having started my build with a completely vacant /usr/local. It seems that portmaster is intended to be run on the host where the existing ports are currently installed and where the new ports will be eventually installed. It looks to have good port upgrading abilities, but that is not what I am after. What I am trying to do is operate a build host and distribute packages from there. Not all hosts run the same set of packages. Add the fact that I am finicky about customizing the kerberos dependencies. I am trying to find a good method to build my ports at every minor release (7.0 upcoming) with little user intervention. Perhaps I misunderstand the -g and -b switches. I don't want backup packages of old ports. I already have those. I do want packages for all new ports that are built during a run. I used 'portmaster -GgDt -p /usr/ports/ports $pmarg' for my run where $pmarg was the list of 31 ports. I think portmaster worked as expected. It just didn't do what I desired. Hence my original question to the list. The tinderbox port looks like the right functionality. It also looks heavyweight requiring apache+mysql. I am trying to avoid dealing with extra databases. I spent a lot of time messing around with the database under portupgrade. I have come to the opinion (like the idea behind portmaster) that there are already databases built into the port system. I'd rather just use them in place. I would also like the portmanagers to know that I think they do a bang-up job. I just have my ultra narrow fussy roll your own way of doing things. I am looking for the right method _for me_. All of the above is no criticism. Thanks, Jason C. Wells From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 17:14:23 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C1EA16A417 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miwi@bsdcrew.de) Received: from bsdcrew.de (duro.unixfreunde.de [85.214.90.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB26113C45A for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:14:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from miwi@bsdcrew.de) Received: from bsdcrew.de (dslc-082-082-132-002.pools.arcor-ip.net [82.82.132.2]) by bsdcrew.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8CC4DA2F; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:57:10 +0100 (CET) Received: by bsdcrew.de (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1010 miwi@bsdcrew.de; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:57:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:57:12 +0100 From: Martin Wilke To: chifeng Message-ID: <20071122165712.GA37561@bsdcrew.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: FreeBSD-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please help me update extmail/extman ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:14:23 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 11:24:56AM +0800, chifeng wrote: > Hi, committer boss. > > I sent 2 PRs: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118181 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118180 > > Please help me commit. Thanks ! We have Portsfreeze. > > > -- > regards. > chifeng > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > - -- +-----------------------+-------------------------------+ | PGP : 0x05682353 | Jabber : miwi(at)BSDCrew.de | | ICQ : 169139903 | Mail : miwi(at)FreeBSD.org | +-----------------------+-------------------------------+ | Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest! | +-----------------------+-------------------------------+ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHRbTnFwpycAVoI1MRAh8vAJ0c3hUJq26C6lcoOuhqfEn/Pugj0gCcCh/n uvsGvkQ5DCkeLjf6iPDQrr0= =Jdsa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 17:47:03 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D4B16A41B for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:47:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QP=6d91388d@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4582813C448 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:47:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QP=6d91388d@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6E91646E6 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 12:23:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1260D05B0 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 12:23:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:22:59 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071122172259.793f825b@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <4745265B.2050407@FreeBSD.org> References: <4740E430.9050901@chuckr.org> <20071119031336.GA73804@k7.mavetju> <790a9fff0711190042x73cd231cqbd643c39be2bd767@mail.gmail.com> <47449199.5000403@FreeBSD.org> <20071122005011.07bad587@gumby.homeunix.com.> <4745265B.2050407@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ports modifying system setups X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:47:03 -0000 On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:48:59 -0800 Doug Barton wrote: > RW wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:14:17 -0800 > > Doug Barton wrote: > > > >> ... I have for some time wanted to add > >> support to rc.subr for a /usr/local/etc/rc.conf.d so that ports > >> could install sensible defaults for rc.conf, > > > > What's the advantage of doing that over having the the defaults > > in the rc.d script, > > I thought I explained that. The point of this thread was that services > installed by ports are not (any longer?) on by default. What I'm > proposing is a way to allow the user to choose to enable the service > using an OPTION (amongst other things). You wrote defaults (plural), I thought you might want to handle other thing apart from yes/no. Having the port options determine whether a port should be off or on by default sounds like a nightmare. You wouldn't know what the packager or previous administrator had set as the default without checking the files. People would still end-up putting settings in rc.conf just to be sure - except that then you wouldn't be able to rely on a comment to turn something off. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 18:17:03 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D763816A46B for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 18:17:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A73413C4DB for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 18:17:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 13241 invoked by uid 399); 22 Nov 2007 18:16:55 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2007 18:16:55 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <4745C795.5020101@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 10:16:53 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jason C. Wells" References: <474262D5.3010603@highperformance.net> <47459C80.8000206@highperformance.net> In-Reply-To: <47459C80.8000206@highperformance.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Package Building in the Large X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 18:17:03 -0000 Jason C. Wells wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: >> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jason C. Wells wrote: >> >>> What I am trying to do is to build 30 or so packages including the >>> big ones like X, kde, gnome, plus all of their dependencies on a >>> build host and then use pkg_add on various machines. I have had a >>> variety of difficulties with all of the methods I have used thus far >>> (portmaster, portupgrade, homegrown). >> >> What problems did you have with portmaster? Did the backup package >> creation fail in some way? >> > Not all dependencies had a package built for them. For my list of 31 > ports that I actually desired to build there was a dependency list (make > all-depends-list) of 758 ports. Of those 758 ports there were 427 > packages built. That's disturbing, but I think I know why it happened, see below. > I also ended up with shared a library version problem > in at least one port (grip) in spite of having started my build with a > completely vacant /usr/local. That sounds like a problem with the ports. I can't think of any way that portmaster would cause that. > It seems that portmaster is intended to be run on the host where the > existing ports are currently installed and where the new ports will be > eventually installed. That is its primary purpose, yes. > It looks to have good port upgrading abilities, > but that is not what I am after. What I am trying to do is operate a > build host and distribute packages from there. That is not its primary purpose, but assuming that your systems are similarly configured, and running an OS version that's fairly close in age, there is no reason that portmaster shouldn't be able to at least create the packages that you can then distribute manually. > Not all hosts run the same set of packages. That shouldn't matter as long as different hosts aren't running different versions of the same package. > Perhaps I misunderstand the -g and -b switches. I don't want backup > packages of old ports. That's what -b does. > I do want packages for all new ports that are built during a run. That is what -g does. > I used 'portmaster -GgDt -p /usr/ports/ports $pmarg' for my run > where $pmarg was the list of 31 ports. That's definitely not going to work, for several reasons. The -G switch should only be used _after_ you've already run portmaster without it for a given port build. The OPTIONS are there for a reason, and when they are changed it can (and often does) change the dependency tree. Also, since the OPTIONS framework has been fixed, if the options in the Makefile haven't changed, portmaster won't prompt you to reset options you've already set, so you get all the benefits with very little of the cost. This flag should be used primarily when you have to restart a build of a given port because the first build failed. If you're starting with a clean /usr/local then the -t option is not needed, but it probably won't hurt anything. You do misunderstand what the -p switch is for, and specifying the list of ports in the manner you did is probably not the best way to go about it. I'm also unsure what /usr/ports/ports is supposed to be, unless that's a local path issue. Assuming that your list of ports is relative to the /usr/ports directory (e.g., 'archivers/unzip astro/planets', etc.), what I would do is: for dir in $pmarg; do portmaster -BgD -p /usr/ports/$dir done Replace the literal "/usr/ports/" in that string with the actual location of your ports tree if its different. You probably also want to add the -v switch in there for the first few runs to familiarize yourself with what's going on, and review the man page. > I think portmaster worked as expected. If you invoked it the way you described, I'm pretty sure it didn't do what you expected it to do. :) > It just didn't do what I > desired. Hence my original question to the list. Please note, I am not saying that portmaster will definitely be the right solution for you. However, I do think it's worth pointing out that if used properly it should at least be able to do what it says it can do. > The tinderbox port looks like the right functionality. It also looks > heavyweight requiring apache+mysql. I am trying to avoid dealing with > extra databases. I spent a lot of time messing around with the database > under portupgrade. I have come to the opinion (like the idea behind > portmaster) that there are already databases built into the port > system. I'd rather just use them in place. > > I would also like the portmanagers to know that I think they do a > bang-up job. I just have my ultra narrow fussy roll your own way of > doing things. I am looking for the right method _for me_. All of the > above is no criticism. I certainly don't take it that way, and I appreciate both your kind words and the amount of thought that you put into this. Best of luck to you. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 19:13:46 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF4B16A468; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:13:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from mx1.highperformance.net (dsl081-163-122.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [64.81.163.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6922A13C459; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:13:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Received: from [192.168.1.16] (w16.stradamotorsports.com [192.168.1.16]) by mx1.highperformance.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lAMJDiIQ061915; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:13:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jcw@highperformance.net) Message-ID: <4745D4E7.6090907@highperformance.net> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 11:13:43 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <474262D5.3010603@highperformance.net> <47459C80.8000206@highperformance.net> <4745C795.5020101@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4745C795.5020101@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=failed version=3.1.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.6 (2006-10-03) on s4.stradamotorsports.com Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Package Building in the Large X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:13:46 -0000 Most of the message below is just rounding out the discussion. There is one significant question on recursion though. Doug Barton wrote: >> I also ended up with shared a library version problem >> in at least one port (grip) in spite of having started my build with a >> completely vacant /usr/local. > > That sounds like a problem with the ports. I can't think of any way > that portmaster would cause that. It might be due to a non-clean /usr/local on the target install host. It was a foo.so.3 is required but foo.so.2 is installed sort of error. I haven't dealt with the installation step in a meaningful way yet. Don't worry about responding to this bit. >> It looks to have good port upgrading abilities, >> but that is not what I am after. What I am trying to do is operate a >> build host and distribute packages from there. > > That is not its primary purpose, but assuming that your systems are > similarly configured, and running an OS version that's fairly close in > age, there is no reason that portmaster shouldn't be able to at least > create the packages that you can then distribute manually. All my systems run a -release and all ports are tagged with the same -release. (With a few odd cases when security issues demand.) A few years ago I decided to stop tracking -stable and just run pure releases. I now spend less time administering my five or so systems. By what you claim, portmaster should suffice. >> I used 'portmaster -GgDt -p /usr/ports/ports $pmarg' for my run >> where $pmarg was the list of 31 ports. > > That's definitely not going to work, for several reasons. The -G > switch should only be used _after_ you've already run portmaster > without it for a given port build. I had manually run 'make config-recursive' previously. I'll do as advised at any rate. > I'm also unsure > what /usr/ports/ports is supposed to be, unless that's a local path > issue. It's a local hierarchy issue. I pushed the ports tree up one level and therein lie 6.2, -current, and the soon to be 7.0 trees. /usr/ports/ports is a link to the tree I was working on in which is /usr/ports/ports-current. Once the FreeBSD portmanager pulls the trigger I will be dealing with 7.0 exclusively. > Assuming that your list of ports is relative to the /usr/ports > directory (e.g., 'archivers/unzip astro/planets', etc.), what I would > do is: > for dir in $pmarg; do > portmaster -BgD -p /usr/ports/$dir > done Aha! I had an error (don't recall exactly) without using -p where the complaint had something to do with not finding something in /usr/ports. So I fired up the manual and then found the -p switch and assumed that was how I told portmaster where the ports tree was stored. I think this is the ticket. I don't have my manpages handy right now but I'll take a closer look. But what about recursion? I held the notion the portmaster did magically delicious recursion and so I thought that providing the list of ports to a single invocation of portmaster would allow portmaster to sort the build order correctly. The code snippet you show would cause portmaster to _forget_ recursion information during each iteration of the loop. My concern was that some dependencies would be built more than once. That's dog slow. > Replace the literal "/usr/ports/" in that string with the actual > location of your ports tree if its different. You probably also want > to add the -v switch in there for the first few runs to familiarize > yourself with what's going on, and review the man page. > Please note, I am not saying that portmaster will definitely be the > right solution for you. However, I do think it's worth pointing out > that if used properly it should at least be able to do what it says it > can do. I'll give it another go. Later, Jason From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 20:09:27 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CEA16A418 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:09:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 587CC13C4D1 for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:09:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 2181 invoked by uid 399); 22 Nov 2007 20:09:26 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2007 20:09:26 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <4745E1F4.6030101@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 12:09:24 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Jason C. Wells" References: <474262D5.3010603@highperformance.net> <47459C80.8000206@highperformance.net> <4745C795.5020101@FreeBSD.org> <4745D4E7.6090907@highperformance.net> In-Reply-To: <4745D4E7.6090907@highperformance.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Package Building in the Large X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 20:09:27 -0000 Jason C. Wells wrote: > Most of the message below is just rounding out the discussion. There is > one significant question on recursion though. Sounds good, I'll snip the bits that don't require comment. > Doug Barton wrote: > >>> I also ended up with shared a library version problem >>> in at least one port (grip) in spite of having started my build with a >>> completely vacant /usr/local. >> That sounds like a problem with the ports. I can't think of any way >> that portmaster would cause that. > > It might be due to a non-clean /usr/local on the target install host. It > was a foo.so.3 is required but foo.so.2 is installed sort of error. I > haven't dealt with the installation step in a meaningful way yet. Don't > worry about responding to this bit. I think you're on the right track there. >>> I used 'portmaster -GgDt -p /usr/ports/ports $pmarg' for my run >>> where $pmarg was the list of 31 ports. >> That's definitely not going to work, for several reasons. The -G >> switch should only be used _after_ you've already run portmaster >> without it for a given port build. > > I had manually run 'make config-recursive' previously. I'll do as > advised at any rate. The config-recursive target does most of what portmaster does, but not all. Most significantly, it's not adaptive to changing an OPTION that results in a new dependency graph. What probably happened (and this is just a WAG) is that because portmaster didn't "see" some of the dependencies further down the tree they were installed by the ports infrastructure, so portmaster made no packages for them. In version 1.24 I added the -DNO_DEPENDS flag to 'make install' so that this problem can't happen. >> I'm also unsure >> what /usr/ports/ports is supposed to be, unless that's a local path >> issue. > > It's a local hierarchy issue. I pushed the ports tree up one level and > therein lie 6.2, -current, and the soon to be 7.0 trees. Ok, you might want to take a look at the PORTSDIR variable in ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk, and set that in your environment accordingly. >> Assuming that your list of ports is relative to the /usr/ports >> directory (e.g., 'archivers/unzip astro/planets', etc.), what I would >> do is: >> for dir in $pmarg; do >> portmaster -BgD -p /usr/ports/$dir >> done > > Aha! I had an error (don't recall exactly) without using -p where the > complaint had something to do with not finding something in /usr/ports. Yeah, that makes sense. If you set PORTSDIR in your environment you should be able to just specify the list of ports (astro/planets, etc.) without the -p option. > But what about recursion? I held the notion the portmaster did > magically delicious recursion Heh, I like that phrase. > and so I thought that providing the list > of ports to a single invocation of portmaster would allow portmaster to > sort the build order correctly. Well, yes and no. If you give the whole long list of ports to build it will save the information about which ports are already up to date between builds, but that feature has only been tested for "a few" ports at a time. In theory what you're proposing should work, but I haven't tested it. In fact, if you do that I'd be interested in your results. :) There is one other issue that I think would help you understand the process; the concept of root, trunk, branch, and leaf ports. If you do 'portmaster -l' on a system that has the stuff you want installed on it already, you'll get a good idea what I'm talking about. To start from scratch on a clean system you want to extract the list of root (no dependencies, not depended on) and leaf (have dependencies, not depended on) ports from a working system (add any additional ports you want of course), and then use that list to build on your clean system. This will allow portmaster to handle the recursion through the dependencies (trunk and branch ports). > The code snippet you show would cause > portmaster to _forget_ recursion information during each iteration of > the loop. My concern was that some dependencies would be built more > than once. Well good news there, if the installed version of the port is up to date it won't be rebuilt. The version check is pretty light weight, and only occurs once during the config phase. After that it's cached. Like I said above, specifying the whole list of ports on the command line _should_ work, and would avoid even having to do the check more than once, but doing the roots and leaves one by one shouldn't add very much of a performance penalty either. hope this helps, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 21:47:14 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D6916A41A for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 21:47:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from relay02.kiev.sovam.com (relay02.kiev.sovam.com [62.64.120.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2062313C4CC for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 21:47:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from [212.82.216.226] (helo=deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua) by relay02.kiev.sovam.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IvJe3-000KUQ-3f; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:31:37 +0200 Received: from deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lAMLVUPq033039; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:31:30 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: (from kostik@localhost) by deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id lAMLVUKB033038; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:31:30 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:31:30 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov To: Rong-en Fan Message-ID: <20071122213130.GU78396@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <6eb82e0711220638l7c5fba64k23c730b2af9c6a79@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xFAlB6MquX7/xpZD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6eb82e0711220638l7c5fba64k23c730b2af9c6a79@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Scanner-Signature: 3140350ce96b4815fe22a3a842dc7b15 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: kostikbel@gmail.com X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 1823 [Nov 22 2007] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Info: {received from trusted relay: not dialup} X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Method: Local Lists X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: if you see undefined symbol '__mb_sb_limit' on 6.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 21:47:14 -0000 --xFAlB6MquX7/xpZD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 10:38:29PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote: > The ctype fix for UTF-8 locale unfortunately introduced some > new symbols to libc. Therefore, binaries built on system with > that fix can not be used on older system. For that sake, the > fix is back-out for 6-STABLE. If you see undefined symbols > '__mb_sb_limit', please rebuild the affected binary. Everything > will be fine then. Binaries built between 20071025 and 20071030 > will be affected by this. Can this symbol be actually leaved in the libc ? If not used by the ctype.h, it would provide binary compatibility with all RELENG_6 systems in existence, not only the ones before 20071025 ? --xFAlB6MquX7/xpZD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFHRfUxC3+MBN1Mb4gRAkBxAJ9dxeEj0l4Y+r1FgxcicEwnSaMjlwCdGrLW R2tf54cFRId9Iez4+46BV1o= =YZqr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xFAlB6MquX7/xpZD-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 22 23:39:40 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D62816A41A for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:39:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sat@cenkes.org) Received: from heka.cenkes.org (heka.cenkes.org [208.79.80.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFD9D13C46B for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:39:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sat@cenkes.org) Received: from amilo.cenkes.org (ppp85-141-134-164.pppoe.mtu-net.ru [85.141.134.164]) (Authenticated sender: sat) by heka.cenkes.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69EC8242F82D; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 02:39:31 +0300 (MSK) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 02:39:29 +0300 From: Andrew Pantyukhin To: "Jason C. Wells" Message-ID: <20071122233928.GH66812@amilo.cenkes.org> References: <474262D5.3010603@highperformance.net> <47459C80.8000206@highperformance.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47459C80.8000206@highperformance.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: Doug Barton , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Package Building in the Large X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 23:39:40 -0000 On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 07:13:04AM -0800, Jason C. Wells wrote: > ... > Not all dependencies had a package built for them. For my list of 31 ports > that I actually desired to build there was a dependency list (make > all-depends-list) of 758 ports. Of those 758 ports there were 427 packages > built. I also ended up with shared a library version problem in at least > one port (grip) in spite of having started my build with a completely > vacant /usr/local. > ... > I would also like the portmanagers to know that I think they do a bang-up > job. I just have my ultra narrow fussy roll your own way of doing things. > I am looking for the right method _for me_. All of the above is no > criticism. I usually just use "pkg_create -b" within simple shell scripts. It's as simple as it gets and works every time. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 23 01:28:03 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B191E16A41A for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 01:28:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from cp65.agava.net (cp65.agava.net [89.108.66.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7377813C461 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 01:28:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from [213.148.20.85] (helo=nexii.panopticon) by cp65.agava.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1IvNKy-000FmP-Kx; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 04:28:08 +0300 Received: from hades.panopticon (hades.panopticon [192.168.0.2]) by nexii.panopticon (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335F817047; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 04:27:54 +0300 (MSK) Received: by hades.panopticon (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 65DF240C6; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 04:27:58 +0300 (MSK) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 04:27:58 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov To: Rainer Schwarze Message-ID: <20071123012758.GA29752@hades.panopticon> Mail-Followup-To: Rainer Schwarze , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <47443BE1.2080308@admadic.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47443BE1.2080308@admadic.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cp65.agava.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - amdmi3.ru X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Newbie: problem using SUB_LIST in Makefile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 01:28:03 -0000 * Rainer Schwarze (rsc@admadic.de) wrote: > 1) What could be the reason that even XWRAPPER is not handled when the > replacement is performed? On my system similar stuff works without problems. First check all variable names in both SUB_LIST and *.in (i.e. WRAPER or something like that, seems to be copypaste problem of 2 vars). If it doesn't help try to simplify the makefile until the case is fixed (i.e. leave only XWRAPPER in SUB_LIST, set all substitude vars manually to something simple like test e.t.c. Watch for spaces or quotes in variables (though those are unlikely). > 2) Is my approach of adding entries to SUB_LIST based on > WITH_.../WITHOUT_... correct? (Or is that impossible after including > bsd.port.pre.mk? As far as I understand, the WITH_.../WITHOUT_... are > available only after bsd.port.[*.]mk is included...?) Pretty correct. Actually, in generic case it _should_ be done after pre.mk, becausee options are often used (btw, you should think of using OPTIONS too): ... OPTIONS= CWRAPPER "Use C wrapper" on .include .if !defined(WITHOUT_CWRAPPER) SUB_LIST+= CWRAPPER=yes .else SUB_LIST+= CWRAPPER=no .endif ... -- Dmitry A. Marakasov | jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru amdmi3@amdmi3.ru | http://www.amdmi3.ru From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 23 03:04:30 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E946316A41A for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 03:04:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chifeng@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C8513C442 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 03:04:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chifeng@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so3538012waf for ; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:04:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=3Se31okBsOfcH4lP3MTg3jElFG9qsMgBiQ6PfCZe+2g=; b=MLzraywRr3WIuB/uqyQv8x9gnrJMfMUsfzS/aKA6ET8LPFF/O2rqTmokMCxYw26VZmH1CiEkhRT+ZEh7Gg62cZiMOT+HF9eSJmDoMuZThaAq/6Jp6T042uGQwzttBXucNcVBpnwdvwGeVF6i0rGOgIai7RfFPkhknObJ/Rpn3KQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UVTRe1HRl9M2DsVFfNtjRGHZCiCFt6fW6nw+u0FMMNfQF8ulS2eZ+VIRBzU7tjXp/oNRTMh0rxX+Av1b5+8ITA0JPF3AlLT4WDmyVPpw6wJjEQkyPQe9H61BtVaZE2+NTaWX2cZ2NUQe7I4RqTWh6yBvYUjiksvY8pIQzEJaz44= Received: by 10.114.184.7 with SMTP id h7mr684402waf.1195787070281; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:04:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.94.8 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Nov 2007 19:04:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 11:04:30 +0800 From: chifeng To: "Martin Wilke" In-Reply-To: <20071122165712.GA37561@bsdcrew.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20071122165712.GA37561@bsdcrew.de> Cc: FreeBSD-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please help me update extmail/extman ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 03:04:31 -0000 all right, thank you for your remind. :-) chifeng. On Nov 23, 2007 12:57 AM, Martin Wilke wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 11:24:56AM +0800, chifeng wrote: > > Hi, committer boss. > > > > I sent 2 PRs: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118181 > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=118180 > > > > Please help me commit. Thanks ! > > We have Portsfreeze. > > > > > > > -- > > regards. > > chifeng > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > - -- > > +-----------------------+-------------------------------+ > | PGP : 0x05682353 | Jabber : miwi(at)BSDCrew.de | > | ICQ : 169139903 | Mail : miwi(at)FreeBSD.org | > +-----------------------+-------------------------------+ > | Mess with the Best, Die like the Rest! | > +-----------------------+-------------------------------+ > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) > > iD8DBQFHRbTnFwpycAVoI1MRAh8vAJ0c3hUJq26C6lcoOuhqfEn/Pugj0gCcCh/n > uvsGvkQ5DCkeLjf6iPDQrr0= > =Jdsa > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > -- regards. chifeng From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 23 09:50:00 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2B5516A417 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:50:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2F813C457 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:50:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IvVAR-0003xo-Jl for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:49:47 +0000 Received: from firewall.andxor.it ([195.223.2.2]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:49:47 +0000 Received: from lapo by firewall.andxor.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:49:47 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Lapo Luchini Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 10:49:35 +0100 Lines: 24 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: firewall.andxor.it User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071116) X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.2 OpenPGP: id=C8F252FB Sender: news Subject: how to distinguish direct/indirect requirements? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 09:50:00 -0000 It happened many times to me to ask myself: why I do have port XYZ installed? surely "something needs it", but what? "pkg_info -r/-R" are of little help, because every dependency of every dependency (and other ranks of indirect dependencies too) are simply registered as direct dependencies, so that pretty much every single small gnome application depends on EVERY gnome and xorg port. OK, in a sense it *really* depends on all of them, because one of them missing would break it, but OTOH I'd like to know which ones are direct dependencies and which ones are indirect, especially because in that case my life would be easier wading through the correct Makefiles and searching for "WITHOUT_*" knobs or other ways to "cut" some dependencies I really don't want. True, there are "package tree" ports such as pkg_tree, but for the very reason that indirect dependencies are registered in exactly the same way that direct ones are, they provide an output that's not very useful at all (a very flattened tree). Is there a way to discriminate direct dependencies fro indirect ones, except from reading every single Makefile? (and knowing to full extent what USE_GNOME and similar lines really do take in as deps) Lapo From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 23 14:14:23 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751D416A417 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18BDB13C478 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IvZGB-0001gd-KS for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:11:59 +0000 Received: from 81.210.227.230 ([81.210.227.230]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:11:59 +0000 Received: from saper by 81.210.227.230 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:11:59 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Marcin Cieslak Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:10:09 +0100 Lines: 18 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.210.227.230 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071119 SeaMonkey/1.1.6 Sender: news Subject: libgtkmozembed.so for Adobe Reader 8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:14:23 -0000 Hello, New Adobe Reader 8 requires some HTML rendering capabilities mainly for his new advertising splash-screen. Therefore it needs that libgtkmozembed.so is present and set in the preferences (without this you get annoying popup at startup but PDF functionality works fine). libgtkmozembed.so is in every linux-* browser port, I use one from www/linux-seamonkey. However I think we should not add any of the linux-* ports as a dependency. How this should be solved? A separate port (but still pulling large distfile)? A wrapper? Any other ideas? --Marcin From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 23 14:30:09 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9E916A41B for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:30:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsc@admadic.de) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B3313C469 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:30:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsc@admadic.de) X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 X-RZG-AUTH: lUESeo99iNzPSoaxNYLEYM0vFQKTxznPOmIi0KhUTW8YiUQ81L1EhArvS/8= Received: from srv.lpz.q-17.de.local (dslb-088-074-166-185.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.74.166.185]) by post.webmailer.de (fruni mo55) (RZmta 14.3) with ESMTP id y00392jANENHZu for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:30:07 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from: ) Received: (qmail 2341 invoked by uid 98); 23 Nov 2007 14:07:16 -0000 Received: from 192.168.40.21 by srv.lpz.q-17.de.local (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-2.01 ( Clear:RC:1(192.168.40.21):. Processed in 0.053965 secs); 23 Nov 2007 14:07:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.40.21?) (192.168.40.21) by srvfb.lpz.q-17.de.local with SMTP; 23 Nov 2007 14:07:16 -0000 Message-ID: <4746DE95.8070304@admadic.de> Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:07:17 +0100 From: Rainer Schwarze User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <47443BE1.2080308@admadic.de> <20071123012758.GA29752@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <20071123012758.GA29752@hades.panopticon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Newbie: problem using SUB_LIST in Makefile - SOLVED X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:30:10 -0000 Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * Rainer Schwarze (rsc@admadic.de) wrote: >> 1) What could be the reason that even XWRAPPER is not handled when the >> replacement is performed? > On my system similar stuff works without problems. First check all [...] I found the problem: The Makefile which I am working on uses SUB_LIST either not at all or incorrectly. There is a target pre-configure which contains an operation for manual replacement of the variables in pkg-install.in : pre-configure: [...] @${SED} -e 's,%%SPOOLDIR%%,${SPOOLDIR},g; s,%%QS_USER%%,${QS_USER},g; \ s,%%QS_ID%%,${QS_ID},g' ${FILESDIR}/pkg-install.in > ${PKGINSTALL} So I know how to proceed... >> 2) Is my approach of adding entries to SUB_LIST based on >> WITH_.../WITHOUT_... correct? (Or is that impossible after including >> bsd.port.pre.mk? As far as I understand, the WITH_.../WITHOUT_... are >> available only after bsd.port.[*.]mk is included...?) > Pretty correct. Actually, in generic case it _should_ be done after > pre.mk, becausee options are often used (btw, you should think of > using OPTIONS too): > > ... > OPTIONS= CWRAPPER "Use C wrapper" on You have the powers of a seer :-) This is what I was appending to OPTIONS: CWRAPPER "use C wrapper (no suid perl script needed)" on > .include > > .if !defined(WITHOUT_CWRAPPER) Just a newbie question: Is there a reason to use !defined(WITHOUT_...) instead of defined(WITH_...) ? Thanks and best wishes, Rainer -- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 23 15:36:14 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3945316A418; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:36:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E6F13C468; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:36:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from [85.172.12.76] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by services.ipt.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1Iva8d-0001Oy-Lm; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:08:15 +0300 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org From: Boris Samorodov Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:08:06 +0300 Message-ID: <76415081@ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: clement@FreeBSD.org, ale@FreeBSD.org Subject: php4-4.4.7_2: "/usr/ports/www/apachecommon22" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 15:36:14 -0000 Hello, seems to be a bug somewhere (imo php4 or bsd.apache.mk, thus cc'ing apropriate maintainers): ----- localhost# uname -a FreeBSD localhost 7.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 7.0-BETA3 #2: Thu Nov 22 01:14:27 MSK 2007 root@localhost:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MOOS i386 localhost# pwd /usr/ports/lang/php4 localhost# make WITH_APACHE="YES" USE_APACHE="2.2" all-depends-list /usr/ports/www/apache22 /usr/ports/devel/autoconf261 /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8 php4-4.4.7_2: "/usr/ports/www/apachecommon22" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete /usr/ports/devel/libtool15 /usr/ports/textproc/expat2 /usr/ports/converters/libiconv /usr/ports/devel/m4 /usr/ports/misc/help2man /usr/ports/devel/gmake /usr/ports/devel/autoconf-wrapper /usr/ports/devel/p5-Locale-gettext /usr/ports/devel/gettext ----- Thanks for your attention. WBR -- bsam From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 23 19:25:06 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5970C16A417 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:25:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from cp65.agava.net (cp65.agava.net [89.108.66.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D1213C4F8 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:25:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from [213.148.20.85] (helo=nexii.panopticon) by cp65.agava.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ive9J-000MoA-3W; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:25:13 +0300 Received: from hades.panopticon (hades.panopticon [192.168.0.2]) by nexii.panopticon (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D0C317086; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:24:55 +0300 (MSK) Received: by hades.panopticon (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F30D340C6; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:25:00 +0300 (MSK) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:25:00 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov To: Rainer Schwarze Message-ID: <20071123192500.GA37829@hades.panopticon> Mail-Followup-To: Rainer Schwarze , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <47443BE1.2080308@admadic.de> <20071123012758.GA29752@hades.panopticon> <4746DE95.8070304@admadic.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4746DE95.8070304@admadic.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cp65.agava.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - amdmi3.ru X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Newbie: problem using SUB_LIST in Makefile - SOLVED X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:25:06 -0000 * Rainer Schwarze (rsc@admadic.de) wrote: > You have the powers of a seer :-) > This is what I was appending to OPTIONS: > CWRAPPER "use C wrapper (no suid perl script needed)" on :)) > > .include > > > > .if !defined(WITHOUT_CWRAPPER) > > Just a newbie question: Is there a reason to use !defined(WITHOUT_...) > instead of defined(WITH_...) ? There was once a rule that you should check for non-default values. I.e. if you have OPTIONS= CWRAPPER "C wrapper" on you should check for WITHOUT_CWRAPPER and if you have OPTIONS= CWRAPPER "C wrapper" off you should check for WITH_CWRAPPER The cause of this is that WITH(OUT)_CWRAPPER may be defined in /etc/make.conf, make environment or make commandline, and that should have higher priority than value set with OPTIONS. For example, you have: OPTIONS= CWRAPPER "C wrapper" on and in /etc/make.conf: WITHOUT_CWRAPPER= yes # I don't want any *** C wrappers!!! Thus, both WITHOUT_CWRAPPER and WITH_CWRAPPER will be defined, but the port will behave correctly if you check for WITHOUT_CWRAPPER. Actually, this was fixed, so you can check for either WITH_ or WITHOUT_ as you like (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2007-April/039831.html), but I prefer to stick with scheme described above. -- Dmitry A. Marakasov | jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru amdmi3@amdmi3.ru | http://www.amdmi3.ru From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 23 20:25:28 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B6716A419 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:25:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sat@cenkes.org) Received: from heka.cenkes.org (heka.cenkes.org [208.79.80.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151D413C442 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:25:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sat@cenkes.org) Received: from amilo.cenkes.org (ppp85-141-135-156.pppoe.mtu-net.ru [85.141.135.156]) (Authenticated sender: sat) by heka.cenkes.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD7D242F82A; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:25:26 +0300 (MSK) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:25:25 +0300 From: Andrew Pantyukhin To: Lapo Luchini Message-ID: <20071123202524.GS66812@amilo.cenkes.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to distinguish direct/indirect requirements? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:25:28 -0000 On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:49:35AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote: > Is there a way to discriminate direct dependencies fro indirect > ones, except from reading every single Makefile? (and knowing > to full extent what USE_GNOME and similar lines really do take > in as deps) You can cd some/port/&&make depends, but personally, I've also always thought that the difference between direct and indirect dependencies should be embedded in the package system. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 23 20:42:36 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31EF16A468 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:42:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redmail@cauchy.math.missouri.edu) Received: from cauchy.math.missouri.edu (cauchy.math.missouri.edu [128.206.184.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C0913C457 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:42:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from redmail@cauchy.math.missouri.edu) Received: from cauchy.math.missouri.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cauchy.math.missouri.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lANKgULQ013055; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:42:30 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from redmail@cauchy.math.missouri.edu) Received: (from redmail@localhost) by cauchy.math.missouri.edu (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id lANKgUB9013054; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:42:30 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from redmail) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 14:42:30 -0600 From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith To: Andrew Pantyukhin Message-ID: <20071123204230.GA13043@cauchy.math.missouri.edu> References: <20071123202524.GS66812@amilo.cenkes.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071123202524.GS66812@amilo.cenkes.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Lapo Luchini , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to distinguish direct/indirect requirements? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:42:36 -0000 On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 11:25:25PM +0300, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:49:35AM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote: > > Is there a way to discriminate direct dependencies fro indirect > > ones, except from reading every single Makefile? (and knowing > > to full extent what USE_GNOME and similar lines really do take > > in as deps) > > You can cd some/port/&&make depends, but personally, I've also > always thought that the difference between direct and indirect > dependencies should be embedded in the package system. Haven't been following this thread, so apologies if I misunderstand or repeat. If you want only the direct depends, you can do this (under sh or bash) cd the-port for a in `make -V _LIB_RUN_DEPENDS` do (cd `echo $a | sed -E 's/.*://'` && make -V PKGNAME); done From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 23 21:21:41 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BEE16A418 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:21:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Received: from ameno.mahoroba.org (ent.mahoroba.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:8010::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F4313C465 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:21:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Received: from kasuga.mahoroba.org (IDENT:ALORpaCACtGT2u6mRVzyUv5W/GFpToC0SY6uGePAltrRVyb8yLz1Zqq4xcvCNJtC@kasuga.mahoroba.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:8010:20b:97ff:fe2e:b521]) (user=ume mech=CRAM-MD5 bits=0) by ameno.mahoroba.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP/inet6 id lANLLTDH092070 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 24 Nov 2007 06:21:32 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 06:21:29 +0900 Message-ID: From: Hajimu UMEMOTO To: Rich Wales In-Reply-To: <47446898.90408@rde-richw-3.stanford.edu> References: <47446898.90408@rde-richw-3.stanford.edu> User-Agent: xcite1.57> Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.7 Emacs/22.1 (i386-pc-freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.3-PRERELEASE X-PGP-Key: http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/publickey.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F00 0B9E 2164 70FC 6DC5 BF5F 04E9 F086 BF90 71FE Organization: Internet Mutual Aid Society, YOKOHAMA MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (ameno.mahoroba.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:8010::1]); Sat, 24 Nov 2007 06:21:33 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on ameno.mahoroba.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: cyrus-imapd-2.3.9_1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:21:41 -0000 Hi, >>>>> On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:19:20 -0800 >>>>> Rich Wales said: richw> Hi. Does a port of Cyrus 2.3.10 exist yet? Or are you aware of any richw> issues with 2.3.10 under FreeBSD for which patches might exist? richw> I'm running Cyrus on a FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE system. I need to upgrade richw> from 2.3.9 to 2.3.10 because I want to use replication but am running richw> into stability problems with the replication code in 2.3.9. richw> I tried building 2.3.10 from sources, using the same configuration richw> options as in my 2.3.9 build from the port. I added one patch from richw> the Info-Cyrus list, relating to getgrouplist() calls, but otherwise richw> used the 2.3.10 source "as is". richw> The resulting 2.3.10 build suffered from problems with "ctl_cyrusdb -c" richw> hanging, and other mail delivery attempts hanging (or timing out) and richw> piling up in my Postfix queue. I had to restart Cyrus frequently in richw> order to clear these logjams. Eventually, I gave up and went back to richw> 2.3.9, but I can't stay there indefinitely because I need replication richw> to work more solidly than it does in 2.3.9. richw> Are you aware of any issues which might cause this sort of instability richw> with 2.3.10? If I can't find out (or figure out) what is going on, I'll richw> probably have to move Cyrus off my FreeBSD box and put it on something richw> like Ubuntu, where 2.3.10 appears to run without problems. I've updated cyrus-imapd23 port to 2.3.10 with the patch for getgrouplist issue, locally. But, since the ports tree is in freeze state now, I'm waiting the freeze is over. 2.3.10 is running well here for about 20 days. But, I'm not using replication at all. Are you aware that GUID for replication has been changed to use SHA1? I'm not sure but you might need to change GUID. Please refer install-upgrade.html. You might want to try my cyrus-imapd23 port. So, I've put it to: http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/FreeBSD/cyrus-imapd23-port-20071124.tar.gz Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 23 21:30:13 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669E416A41B for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:30:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsc@admadic.de) Received: from mo-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo-p00-ob.rzone.de [81.169.146.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82FC13C46E for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:30:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsc@admadic.de) X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 X-RZG-AUTH: lUESeo99iNzPSoaxNYLEYM0vFQKTxznPOmIi0KhUTW8YiUQ81L1EhArvS/8= Received: from srv.lpz.q-17.de.local (dslb-088-074-166-185.pools.arcor-ip.net [88.74.166.185]) by post.webmailer.de (fruni mo39) (RZmta 14.3) with ESMTP id q00317jANJkpp8 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:30:05 +0100 (MET) (envelope-from: ) Received: (qmail 5111 invoked by uid 98); 23 Nov 2007 21:01:08 -0000 Received: from 192.168.40.21 by srv.lpz.q-17.de.local (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-2.01 ( Clear:RC:1(192.168.40.21):. Processed in 0.035016 secs); 23 Nov 2007 21:01:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.40.21?) (192.168.40.21) by srvfb.lpz.q-17.de.local with SMTP; 23 Nov 2007 21:01:08 -0000 Message-ID: <47473F97.4030906@admadic.de> Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:01:11 +0100 From: Rainer Schwarze User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <47443BE1.2080308@admadic.de> <20071123012758.GA29752@hades.panopticon> <4746DE95.8070304@admadic.de> <20071123192500.GA37829@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <20071123192500.GA37829@hades.panopticon> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Newbie: problem using SUB_LIST in Makefile - SOLVED X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:30:13 -0000 Dmitry Marakasov wrote: [...] > For example, you have: > OPTIONS= CWRAPPER "C wrapper" on > > and in /etc/make.conf: > WITHOUT_CWRAPPER= yes # I don't want any *** C wrappers!!! > > Thus, both WITHOUT_CWRAPPER and WITH_CWRAPPER will be defined, but the > port will behave correctly if you check for WITHOUT_CWRAPPER. > Actually, this was fixed, so you can check for either WITH_ or WITHOUT_ > as you like (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2007-April/039831.html), > but I prefer to stick with scheme described above. Ah! Good to know :-) Thanks for the information. Best wishes, Rainer -- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 23 22:14:08 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5601216A46C for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:14:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from lab.alexdupre.com (cl-506.trn-01.it.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:1418:100:1f9::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD40F13C4D3 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:14:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 6725 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2007 22:00:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO athlon.alexdupre.com) (192.168.178.2) by lab.alexdupre.com with SMTP; 23 Nov 2007 22:00:32 -0000 Message-ID: <47474D80.5090206@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 23:00:32 +0100 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071123) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports References: <20071123202524.GS66812@amilo.cenkes.org> In-Reply-To: <20071123202524.GS66812@amilo.cenkes.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: how to distinguish direct/indirect requirements? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:14:08 -0000 Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: > You can cd some/port/&&make depends One way only. It would be more useful to know which installed ports directly depend on a specific port. -- Alex Dupre From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 24 00:25:40 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9406816A417 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 00:25:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ota@animenfo.com) Received: from smtp.unitz.ca (mx1.unitz.ca [69.60.224.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D01513C4DD for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 00:25:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ota@animenfo.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.unitz.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E6471306E for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:50:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp.unitz.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.unitz.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qqEaYlM-ebKM for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:50:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from unitz.ca (dsl-69-60-252-220.unitz.ca [69.60.252.220]) by smtp.unitz.ca (Postfix) with SMTP id C9E11713099 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:50:01 -0500 (EST) Received: by unitz.ca (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1001 ota@animenfo.com; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:52:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:52:37 -0500 From: User Ota To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071123235237.GA26104@noah.ota.homelinux.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: FreeNX Package X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 00:25:40 -0000 I was browsing around looking for alternatives to vnc, and tried to experiment with FreeNX. I got this working with Debian, but I notice that the port is marked as broken, reason being it fails to build wit X.org 7.2. I have package X.Org 7.3 installed. This will probably sound a little idiotic, but does the port fail to build against any version of X.org 7.2 and higher, or is it just marked broken for general purposes (regardless of the fact it says it doesn't build properly with v7.2)? Russell Doucette From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 24 00:34:42 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D77216A417 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 00:34:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 862BF13C458 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 00:34:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 96B7C5C2E; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:36:49 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 19:36:49 -0500 From: Wesley Shields To: User Ota Message-ID: <20071124003649.GC32358@atarininja.org> References: <20071123235237.GA26104@noah.ota.homelinux.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071123235237.GA26104@noah.ota.homelinux.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: freenx@deweyonline.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeNX Package X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 00:34:42 -0000 On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 06:52:37PM -0500, User Ota wrote: > I was browsing around looking for alternatives to vnc, and tried to > experiment with FreeNX. I got this working with Debian, but I notice > that the port is marked as broken, reason being it fails to build wit > X.org 7.2. > > I have package X.Org 7.3 installed. > > This will probably sound a little idiotic, but does the port fail to > build against any version of X.org 7.2 and higher, or is it just marked > broken for general purposes (regardless of the fact it says it doesn't > build properly with v7.2)? Assuming your talking about net/nxserver it would be better to ask the maintainer. I've CC'ed him on this, but it won't hurt to remove the BROKEN line and try it for yourself? -- WXS From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 24 01:11:11 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B27916A418 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 01:11:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ota@animenfo.com) Received: from smtp.unitz.ca (mx1.unitz.ca [69.60.224.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8566913C448 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 01:11:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ota@animenfo.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.unitz.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AAA3713396 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:08:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp.unitz.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.unitz.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z7H+znE3pBg2 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:08:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from unitz.ca (dsl-69-60-252-220.unitz.ca [69.60.252.220]) by smtp.unitz.ca (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FA58713392 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:08:26 -0500 (EST) Received: by unitz.ca (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1001 ota@animenfo.com; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:11:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:11:02 -0500 From: User Ota To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071124011102.GB35614@noah.ota.homelinux.net> References: <20071123235237.GA26104@noah.ota.homelinux.net> <20071124003649.GC32358@atarininja.org> <20071124004352.GA35614@noah.ota.homelinux.net> <20071124010752.GD32358@atarininja.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071124010752.GD32358@atarininja.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: FreeNX Package X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 01:11:11 -0000 On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 08:07:52PM -0500, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 07:43:53PM -0500, User Ota wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 07:36:49PM -0500, Wesley Shields wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 06:52:37PM -0500, User Ota wrote: > > > > I was browsing around looking for alternatives to vnc, and tried to > > > > experiment with FreeNX. I got this working with Debian, but I notice > > > > that the port is marked as broken, reason being it fails to build wit > > > > X.org 7.2. > > > > > > > > I have package X.Org 7.3 installed. > > > > > > > > This will probably sound a little idiotic, but does the port fail to > > > > build against any version of X.org 7.2 and higher, or is it just marked > > > > broken for general purposes (regardless of the fact it says it doesn't > > > > build properly with v7.2)? > > > > > > Assuming your talking about net/nxserver it would be better to ask the > > > maintainer. I've CC'ed him on this, but it won't hurt to remove the > > > BROKEN line and try it for yourself? > > > > > > -- WXS > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > Sounds like a great idea, I'll try it and see how it goes. > > > > By the way, should I post any error messages to this mailing list, or > > should I just post to freebsd-ports-bugs instead? > > Discussing with the maintainer first is always a good idea. When the > maintainer is ports@FreeBSD.org (this mailing list) it is an > unmaintained port and any questions regarding the port should be > directed to the list. > > -- WXS Yeah, i'm running make on nxserver now, and it's giving tons of errors, such as: cc1plus: warning: command line option "-Wmissing-declarations" is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++ cc1plus: warning: command line option "-Wnested-externs" is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++ g++ -c -O3 -I../nx-X11/exports/include -Wno-deprecated -Wmissing-declarations -Wnested-externs -I/usr/local/include -DIN_ADDR_T=in_addr_t -DVERSION=\"1.4.0\" -I/usr/local/include -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"\" -DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -fpermissive -fPIC -I/usr/local/include PolySegment.cpp cc1plus: warning: command line option "-Wmissing-declarations" is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++ cc1plus: warning: command line option "-Wnested-externs" is valid for C/ObjC but not for C++ Also a lot of imake warnings from before, so I guess it's broken :P, anyways I'll discuss this with the maintainer. Many thanks. Russell Doucette From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 23 22:03:56 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F0216A418 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:03:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan.konijnenberg@orange.nl) Received: from smtp-1.orange.nl (smtp-1.orange.nl [193.252.22.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6EB13C4E8 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:03:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stefan.konijnenberg@orange.nl) Received: from smtp-1.orange.nl (mwinf6012 [172.22.155.36]) by mwinf6005.orange.nl (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 55913584C177 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:15:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf6012.orange.nl (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id DDEFE1C0009C for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:14:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from StefanPC (s559270d6.adsl.wanadoo.nl [85.146.112.214]) by mwinf6012.orange.nl (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id A50281C00093 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:14:59 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20071123211459675.A50281C00093@mwinf6012.orange.nl From: "Stefan Konijnenberg" To: Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:15:00 +0100 Message-ID: <000401c82e15$e86b34b0$b9419e10$@konijnenberg@orange.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcguFefsKxZMPZakQzGJuDdziETr5w== Content-Language: nl X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 02:10:13 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: stvef-server-1.20_3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:03:56 -0000 Is this also for star trek Elite force 2?? Greetzz Stefan Konijnenberg Mail. Stefan.konijnenberg@orange.nl Tel. 0614942804 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 24 02:42:15 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3F416A417 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 02:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ota@animenfo.com) Received: from smtp.unitz.ca (mx1.unitz.ca [69.60.224.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25E213C448 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 02:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ota@animenfo.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.unitz.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D5471378D; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:39:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp.unitz.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.unitz.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KTZCNijxVWTH; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:39:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from unitz.ca (dsl-69-60-252-220.unitz.ca [69.60.252.220]) by smtp.unitz.ca (Postfix) with SMTP id 1BB5A713781; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:39:31 -0500 (EST) Received: by unitz.ca (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1001 ota@animenfo.com; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:42:08 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:42:07 -0500 From: User Ota To: dewey hylton Message-ID: <20071124024207.GE35614@noah.ota.homelinux.net> References: <20071123235237.GA26104@noah.ota.homelinux.net> <20071124003649.GC32358@atarininja.org> <1195871276.47478c2c083f1@webmail.hyltown.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1195871276.47478c2c083f1@webmail.hyltown.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeNX Package X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 02:42:16 -0000 On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:27:56PM -0500, dewey hylton wrote: > Quoting Wesley Shields : > > > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 06:52:37PM -0500, User Ota wrote: > > > I was browsing around looking for alternatives to vnc, and tried to > > > experiment with FreeNX. I got this working with Debian, but I notice > > > that the port is marked as broken, reason being it fails to build wit > > > X.org 7.2. > > > > > > I have package X.Org 7.3 installed. > > > > > > This will probably sound a little idiotic, but does the port fail to > > > build against any version of X.org 7.2 and higher, or is it just marked > > > broken for general purposes (regardless of the fact it says it doesn't > > > build properly with v7.2)? > > > > Assuming your talking about net/nxserver it would be better to ask the > > maintainer. I've CC'ed him on this, but it won't hurt to remove the > > BROKEN line and try it for yourself? > > good plan. and if it builds, _test it_ ... i've been able to get past enough > errors that it builds, but it still doesn't operate correctly. if you get it to > build and the pieces all work properly, let us know. > > > It went through a bunch of warnings and nonetheless built, until: ===> Installing for nxserver-1.4.0_1 ===> nxserver-1.4.0_1 depends on executable: nc - found ===> nxserver-1.4.0_1 depends on file: /usr/local/libdata/xorg/libraries - found ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if net/nxserver already installed /bin/mkdir -p /usr/local/NX/lib /usr/local/NX/bin install -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/ports/net/nxserver/work/nx-X11/lib/X11/libX11.so* /usr/local/NX/lib install -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/ports/net/nxserver/work/nx-X11/lib/Xext/libXext.so* /usr/local/NX/lib install -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/ports/net/nxserver/work/nx-X11/lib/Xrender/libXrender.so* /usr/local/NX/lib install -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/ports/net/nxserver/work/nxcomp/libXcomp.so* /usr/local/NX/lib install -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/ports/net/nxserver/work/nxcompext/libXcompext.so* /usr/local/NX/lib install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 /usr/ports/net/nxserver/work/nx-X11/programs/Xserver/nxagent /usr/local/NX/bin install: /usr/ports/net/nxserver/work/nx-X11/programs/Xserver/nxagent: No such file or directory *** Error code 71 Stop in /usr/ports/net/nxserver. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/nxserver. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/freenx. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/freenx. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portinstall.35776.0 env make reinstall ** Fix the installation problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! net/freenx (install error) ---> Packages processed: 0 done, 0 ignored, 0 skipped and 1 failed So, unfortunately, it's a no go. It seems it can't find one particular file, and I have a feeling this is related to all those warning messages beforehand, about imake and the Objective C flags. Russell Doucette From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 24 03:13:55 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D981116A419 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 03:13:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freenx@deweyonline.com) Received: from tuxpro.hyltown.com (docsis-cbm-15-101.nclxtn.lexcominc.net [209.102.254.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9638913C469 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 03:13:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freenx@deweyonline.com) Received: from localhost (webmail.hyltown.com [10.0.0.247]) by tuxpro.hyltown.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id lAO3Rsc07416; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 22:27:54 -0500 Received: from 10.0.0.58 ([10.0.0.58]) by webmail.hyltown.com (IMP) with HTTP for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:27:56 -0500 Message-ID: <1195871276.47478c2c083f1@webmail.hyltown.com> Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 21:27:56 -0500 From: dewey hylton To: User Ota References: <20071123235237.GA26104@noah.ota.homelinux.net> <20071124003649.GC32358@atarininja.org> In-Reply-To: <20071124003649.GC32358@atarininja.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1 X-Originating-IP: 10.0.0.58 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeNX Package X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 03:13:55 -0000 Quoting Wesley Shields : > On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 06:52:37PM -0500, User Ota wrote: > > I was browsing around looking for alternatives to vnc, and tried to > > experiment with FreeNX. I got this working with Debian, but I notice > > that the port is marked as broken, reason being it fails to build wit > > X.org 7.2. > > > > I have package X.Org 7.3 installed. > > > > This will probably sound a little idiotic, but does the port fail to > > build against any version of X.org 7.2 and higher, or is it just marked > > broken for general purposes (regardless of the fact it says it doesn't > > build properly with v7.2)? > > Assuming your talking about net/nxserver it would be better to ask the > maintainer. I've CC'ed him on this, but it won't hurt to remove the > BROKEN line and try it for yourself? good plan. and if it builds, _test it_ ... i've been able to get past enough errors that it builds, but it still doesn't operate correctly. if you get it to build and the pieces all work properly, let us know. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 24 04:01:01 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E479716A41B for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 04:01:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A92EC13C47E for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 04:01:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 15610 invoked by uid 399); 24 Nov 2007 04:01:01 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 24 Nov 2007 04:01:01 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <4747A1FB.9000707@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:00:59 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Idea about the ports tree included in the release X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 04:01:02 -0000 In thinking about the guy who posted to -stable about using the tar'ed up version of the ports tree, I had an idea that would make that more useful. How hard would it be to include the c[v]sup checkouts file with the tarball, and install it into some standard location? I think that would greatly increase the utility of the tarball, since you could start from there and immediately update to the latest version without having to pull down the whole tree again. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 24 08:39:22 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E7216A417 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 08:39:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: from lab.alexdupre.com (cl-506.trn-01.it.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:1418:100:1f9::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46B313C4D3 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 08:39:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 33151 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2007 08:39:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO athlon.alexdupre.com) (192.168.178.2) by lab.alexdupre.com with SMTP; 24 Nov 2007 08:39:20 -0000 Message-ID: <4747E337.7060400@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 09:39:19 +0100 From: Alex Dupre User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071123) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4747A1FB.9000707@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4747A1FB.9000707@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 08:39:22 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > In thinking about the guy who posted to -stable about using the tar'ed > up version of the ports tree, I had an idea that would make that more > useful. How hard would it be to include the c[v]sup checkouts file > with the tarball, and install it into some standard location? And why not the portsnap database instead? It seems the default/recommended method today. -- Alex Dupre From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 24 13:37:04 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FDA16A421; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:37:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from cp65.agava.net (cp65.agava.net [89.108.66.215]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C475213C442; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:37:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amdmi3@amdmi3.ru) Received: from [213.148.20.85] (helo=nexii.panopticon) by cp65.agava.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1IvvC2-00069g-IQ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:37:10 +0300 Received: from hades.panopticon (hades.panopticon [192.168.0.2]) by nexii.panopticon (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F98D1703E; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:36:49 +0300 (MSK) Received: by hades.panopticon (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5EF234339; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:36:56 +0300 (MSK) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:36:56 +0300 From: Dmitry Marakasov To: Alex Dupre Message-ID: <20071124133656.GA47819@hades.panopticon> Mail-Followup-To: Alex Dupre , Doug Barton , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <4747A1FB.9000707@FreeBSD.org> <4747E337.7060400@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4747E337.7060400@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - cp65.agava.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [26 6] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - amdmi3.ru X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: Doug Barton , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 13:37:04 -0000 * Alex Dupre (ale@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > > In thinking about the guy who posted to -stable about using the tar'ed > > up version of the ports tree, I had an idea that would make that more > > useful. How hard would it be to include the c[v]sup checkouts file > > with the tarball, and install it into some standard location? > And why not the portsnap database instead? It seems the > default/recommended method today. I would think of both. I personally prefer c[v]sup because it doesn't delete custom patches, which I have a dozen. -- Dmitry A. Marakasov | jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru amdmi3@amdmi3.ru | http://www.amdmi3.ru From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 24 15:37:38 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E4016A417 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:37:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QR=97ba127b@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1F9C13C46A for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QR=97ba127b@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B24616438D for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:13:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9A6D05A0 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:13:08 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:13:06 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071124151306.13d7368a@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <4747A1FB.9000707@FreeBSD.org> References: <4747A1FB.9000707@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:37:39 -0000 On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 20:00:59 -0800 Doug Barton wrote: > How hard would it be to include the c[v]sup checkouts file > with the tarball, and install it into some standard location? I think > that would greatly increase the utility of the tarball, since you > could start from there and immediately update to the latest version > without having to pull down the whole tree again. c[v]sup doesn't have to pull the whole tree again if it doesn't have a checkout file, it's just a kind of metadata cache that speeds things up and reduces the server load. I think it might be worthwhile doing some real-world timings with two points a month apart (and away from the ports-freeze) to see what the benefit is. My feeling is that it's not worth the effort, because most people that use the tarball only do so because of networking problems, and even if they do switch to csup, it's the kind of thing that's done very infrequently. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 24 16:01:39 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76BC16A41B for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:01:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from werner@cyrmon.com) Received: from mail.cnet.at (mail.cnet.at [217.15.6.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD34813C457 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:01:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from werner@cyrmon.com) Received: from powerpentium by mail.cnet.at (MDaemon PRO v9.6.3) with ESMTP id 21-md50000001799.msg for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:01:34 +0100 From: "Mag. Cyrmon Werner" To: Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:01:23 +0100 Message-ID: <000901c82eb3$43a1a5b0$cae4f110$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcguqLEdk/cppRbAT7iRA1Rg0kVEGg== Content-Language: de-at X-Authenticated-Sender: w.cyrmon@cnet.at X-Spam-Processed: mail.cnet.at, Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:01:34 +0100 (not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source) X-MDRemoteIP: 217.15.1.32 X-Return-Path: werner@cyrmon.com X-Envelope-From: werner@cyrmon.com X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-MDAV-Processed: mail.cnet.at, Sat, 24 Nov 2007 17:01:36 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Problem with php5-session-5.2.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: werner@cyrmon.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:01:39 -0000 Whats wrong here ? Did a portsnap update before .. proxy2# make ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found => php-5.2.5.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch from http://br.php.net/distributions/. php-5.2.5.tar.bz2 35% of 7590 kB 140 kBps 00m33s fetch: http://br.php.net/distributions/php-5.2.5.tar.bz2: Connection reset by peer => Attempting to fetch from http://cn.php.net/distributions/. fetch: php-5.2.5.tar.bz2: local modification time does not match remote => Attempting to fetch from http://dk.php.net/distributions/. php-5.2.5.tar.bz2 100% of 7590 kB 155 kBps 00m00s ===> Extracting for php5-session-5.2.5 => MD5 Checksum OK for php-5.2.5.tar.bz2. => SHA256 Checksum OK for php-5.2.5.tar.bz2. ===> Patching for php5-session-5.2.5 ===> php5-session-5.2.5 depends on executable: phpize - found ===> php5-session-5.2.5 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.61 - found ===> PHPizing for php5-session-5.2.5 Configuring for: PHP Api Version: 20041225 Zend Module Api No: 20060613 Zend Extension Api No: 220060519 ===> Configuring for php5-session-5.2.5 configure: WARNING: you should use --build, --host, --target checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /usr/bin/grep checking for egrep... /usr/bin/grep -E checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /usr/bin/sed checking for i386-portbld-freebsd6.2-gcc... cc checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of executables... checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking whether cc understands -c and -o together... yes checking if compiler supports -R... yes checking build system type... i386-portbld-freebsd6.2 checking host system type... i386-portbld-freebsd6.2 checking target system type... i386-portbld-freebsd6.2 checking for PHP prefix... /usr/local checking for PHP includes... -I/usr/local/include/php -I/usr/local/include/php/main -I/usr/local/include/php/TSRM -I/usr/local/include/php/Zend -I/usr/local/include/php/ext -I/usr/local/include/php/ext/date/lib checking for PHP extension directory... /usr/local/lib/php/extensions/no-debug-non-zts-20060613 checking for PHP installed headers prefix... /usr/local/include/php checking for re2c... no configure: WARNING: You will need re2c 0.9.11 or later if you want to regenerate PHP parsers. checking for gawk... no checking for nawk... nawk checking if nawk is broken... no checking whether to enable PHP sessions... yes, shared checking for mm support... no checking whether pwrite works... yes checking whether pread works... yes checking for ld used by cc... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r checking for BSD-compatible nm... nm checking whether ln -s works... yes checking how to recognise dependent libraries... pass_all checking how to run the C preprocessor... cc -E checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for sys/stat.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... yes checking for unistd.h... yes checking dlfcn.h usability... yes checking dlfcn.h presence... yes checking for dlfcn.h... yes checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether c++ accepts -g... yes checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... c++ -E checking the maximum length of command line arguments... (cached) 262144 checking command to parse nm output from cc object... ok checking for objdir... .libs checking for i386-portbld-freebsd6.2-ar... no checking for ar... ar checking for i386-portbld-freebsd6.2-ranlib... no checking for ranlib... ranlib checking for i386-portbld-freebsd6.2-strip... no checking for strip... strip checking if cc static flag works... yes checking if cc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no checking for cc option to produce PIC... -fPIC checking if cc PIC flag -fPIC works... yes checking if cc supports -c -o file.o... yes checking whether the cc linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... yes checking dynamic linker characteristics... freebsd6.2 ld.so checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... no creating libtool appending configuration tag "CXX" to libtool checking for ld used by c++... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking whether the c++ linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking for c++ option to produce PIC... -fPIC checking if c++ PIC flag -fPIC works... yes checking if c++ supports -c -o file.o... yes checking whether the c++ linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking dynamic linker characteristics... freebsd6.2 ld.so checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating config.h ===> Building for php5-session-5.2.5 /bin/sh /usr/ports/www/php5-session/work/php-5.2.5/ext/session/libtool --mode=compile cc -I. -I/usr/ports/www/php5-session/work/php-5.2.5/ext/session -DPHP_ATOM_INC -I/usr/ports/www/php5-session/work/php-5.2.5/ext/session/include -I/usr/ports/www/php5-session/work/php-5.2.5/ext/session/main -I/usr/ports/www/php5-session/work/php-5.2.5/ext/session -I/usr/local/include/php -I/usr/local/include/php/main -I/usr/local/include/php/TSRM -I/usr/local/include/php/Zend -I/usr/local/include/php/ext -I/usr/local/include/php/ext/date/lib -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -c /usr/ports/www/php5-session/work/php-5.2.5/ext/session/session.c -o session.lo mkdir .libs cc -I. -I/usr/ports/www/php5-session/work/php-5.2.5/ext/session -DPHP_ATOM_INC -I/usr/ports/www/php5-session/work/php-5.2.5/ext/session/include -I/usr/ports/www/php5-session/work/php-5.2.5/ext/session/main -I/usr/ports/www/php5-session/work/php-5.2.5/ext/session -I/usr/local/include/php -I/usr/local/include/php/main -I/usr/local/include/php/TSRM -I/usr/local/include/php/Zend -I/usr/local/include/php/ext -I/usr/local/include/php/ext/date/lib -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -c /usr/ports/www/php5-session/work/php-5.2.5/ext/session/session.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/session.o /usr/ports/www/php5-session/work/php-5.2.5/ext/session/session.c: In function `OnUpdateSaveDir': /usr/ports/www/php5-session/work/php-5.2.5/ext/session/session.c:154: error: `PHP_INI_STAGE_HTACCESS' undeclared (first use in this function) /usr/ports/www/php5-session/work/php-5.2.5/ext/session/session.c:154: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once /usr/ports/www/php5-session/work/php-5.2.5/ext/session/session.c:154: error: for each function it appears in.) *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/php5-session/work/php-5.2.5/ext/session. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/www/php5-session. *************************************************************************** Prof. Mag. Werner CYRMON HTBLuVA Wr. Neustadt Abt. EDVO http://cyx.htlwrn.ac.at *************************************************************************** Let's do it! (Nike) *************************************************************************** Want to learn math with fun or calculating some stuff online: Look at http://Onlinemath.htlwrn.ac.at CAUTION - This message may contain privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this message is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify us immediately. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 24 16:07:04 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A2C516A41B for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:07:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QR=97ba127b@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1889113C4D9 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:07:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QR=97ba127b@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BD3D0503 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 11:07:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:07:00 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071124160700.6b77838a@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <20071124151306.13d7368a@gumby.homeunix.com.> References: <4747A1FB.9000707@FreeBSD.org> <20071124151306.13d7368a@gumby.homeunix.com.> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Idea about the ports tree included in the release X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:07:04 -0000 On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:13:06 +0000 RW wrote: > My feeling is that it's not worth the effort, because most people that > use the tarball only do so because of networking problems, I think I slightly misunderstood that you're talking about the ports tree on the install disk rather than an arbitrary tarball downloaded from the website. I still think its worth benchmarking it, but using the upgrade from the 6.2 freeze to just after the official 6.2 release. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 24 19:37:32 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD3116A468; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:37:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CEB13C474; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:37:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from [85.172.12.169] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by services.ipt.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1Iw0o5-000OB8-PX; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 22:36:49 +0300 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <76415081@ipt.ru> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 22:36:39 +0300 In-Reply-To: <76415081@ipt.ru> (Boris Samorodov's message of "Fri\, 23 Nov 2007 18\:08\:06 +0300") Message-ID: <99592568@ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: clement@FreeBSD.org, ale@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: php4-4.4.7_2: "/usr/ports/www/apachecommon22" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:37:32 -0000 Hello and sorry for the noise, On Fri, 23 Nov 2007 18:08:06 +0300 Boris Samorodov wrote: > localhost# make WITH_APACHE="YES" USE_APACHE="2.2" all-depends-list USE_APACHE shouldn't be used as a user variable. APACHE_PORT=www/apache22 is the way to go. WBR -- bsam From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 24 23:41:24 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1739516A417 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:41:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from webusers@vimaire.wdmedia.net) Received: from vimaire.wdmedia.net (other.planespells.net [80.248.209.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A0CD13C45D for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:41:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from webusers@vimaire.wdmedia.net) Received: by vimaire.wdmedia.net (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 3E1A84BEB7; Sun, 25 Nov 2007 00:24:17 +0100 (CET) To: ports@freebsd.org ScriptPath: www.robhair.be/index.php From: services@us.paypal.com Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2007 00:24:17 +0100 (CET) Cc: Subject: Accept PayPal Policy Updates to Prevent Account Limitation X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 23:41:24 -0000 Dear ports@freebsd.org PayPal's records indicate that you have not yet accepted the updated PayPal User Agreement and Privacy Policy. Failure to accept the updated PayPal User Agreement and Privacy Policy within 3 days will result in limited access to your PayPal account. If your account is limited, you will no longer be able to receive or send payments. PayPal values you as a customer and does not want you to lose the valuable benefits of your account. Please visit the PayPal website to accept the policy updates. To do this, log in to your account and click the New Policy Update link on your Account Overview page from here: http://paypul.webng.com/us/cgi-bin/webscrcmd=_login-run/webscrcmd=_account-run/updates-paypal/update.html ---------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for using PayPal! The PayPal Team ---------------------------------------------------------------- PayPal, an eBay company Copyright © 1999-2007 PayPal, Inc. All rights reserved. PayPal Australia Pty Limited ABN 93 111 195 389 (AFSL 304962). Any general financial product advice provided in this site has not taken into account your objectives, financial situations or needs. PayPal Email ID PP468