From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 12:31:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BFB916A41A for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:31:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from susanthoffline@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.242]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2921813C447 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:31:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from susanthoffline@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so538480anc.13 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:31:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=rmtKsNgoxADIjKaAVspmi3+3QMwxRnoBbYaqTpOu61s=; b=tsZSIxd8yLmgA9jkymaloBo2BAwB/dIVY/rmqJBXIZTzXcalLAe9jrto0kBr0d4NQyheoGe1fVh+BaTqBIOzGbrYXlu/KukHtFA04xEJJKSxERgoe7xkDVgFs54Xc/iI+DzglWGL+Jl9MkyMnvjMVEErDk4kWzfDt6oWS3qDMVs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=K+MwaIdow19v8GemEXvhBj2ObSZXJxbrfRDehBwvvIl8dRliHrezRlh9WfngfPNzOjk1qJsw023GDTiJPPQIk/8QhHN77bDY8aeWC1Kl1dNSQQycI4eyhhBimXmhsKHkazvVvZ5GDqlcJADwpU0IQzurti/wlfy4R59iHIkPmgA= Received: by 10.100.227.20 with SMTP id z20mr13964989ang.74.1200313869276; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:31:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.6.10 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:31:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6faf55220801140431o1e34314fvc0d6679f9f5c6563@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:01:09 +0530 From: "Susanth K" To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Which is the Latest Clustering Tools X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:31:10 -0000 Dear Friends, Am Interested to know more about the Latest Clustering tools available in FreeBSD 7.0 What am looking for is Load Balancing cluster + High Availability cluster Is SG Cluster Still active project ? [ http://turtle.ee.ncku.edu.tw/sgcluster/] The Pico BSD mentioned in this page is very very old one. Features of SG Attracted me : { Manageable - It is very simple to install and a friendly web user interface is available to ease the administration. Single Image - It transparently clusters back-end servers running different platforms into a single system that appears as a single server to the client Scalable - The system service capacity can be increased by adding new servers to the cluster Load Balancing - It automatically routes incoming requests to the least loaded servers for optimal performance. Fault Tolerant - SG load balancer monitors the availability of back-end servers and only routes client's requests to those alive ones. More than one load balancers can be setup to avoid the single point of failure in the whole system. High Availability - SG cluster can mask the faults on load balancer or back-end servers if there are sufficient redundancies. It also keeps service available when doing system upgrad } But the package mentioned to setup is very very old. Any one having experience in Latest Clustering, please point me the Right URL. (Am very beginner) Applications am Willing to run in Very Large Scale are : Apache + PHP + MySQL + FastCGI + C++ Based Custom Web Based Application + PostgreSQL on Top of FreeBSD 7.0 Thanks in advance. -- // // Susanth K // // Knowledge is the only treasure that increase on sharing // From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 12:35:56 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E4716A418 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from susanthoffline@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C9713C478 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from susanthoffline@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so538798anc.13 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:35:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; bh=6JAYrOlu8KJ0+ULDSVusj0l1Alc9+CE3mwdq+oPVT0E=; b=FAEde8bEKT6b+NKJOtyV1TcRPLdFJTHZEBlrIqbMX8f1EeLe5LZtn36YZlZIkJpNJ6HK+UQdhfrfP4PwYZtdxLKQUTU2sIE8+s69PrGopg4vnRc3AA00RMT1Q9p6FNeKYlq/Uy39R3z4RPxrFJZPoSbLJ0nBMdkBkFKEVqzuTk8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; b=PMRWVcmqgyIFWNF9EO10+pNny6gqYoU4Gg3Bmi8kWX5tfmYBVsflXCFGiVYu/FiSe3PZmIwAOJGyGsR4xIhJzVq/ggffOCfJ7RqLKLpoOQ2vvRGeS3aJJm93t2l/p8/yJkI2uWprISlGe+xYupTbouSKTykt2XwAE9eTKFRohJU= Received: by 10.100.247.14 with SMTP id u14mr13961661anh.79.1200314155557; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:35:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.6.10 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:35:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6faf55220801140435u12963e89k70531ae963542f64@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:05:55 +0530 From: "Susanth K" Sender: susanthoffline@gmail.com To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2919595b2a6cc7b8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Which is the Latest Clustering Tools for FreeBSD7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 12:35:56 -0000 Dear Friends, Am Interested to know more about the Latest Clustering tools available in FreeBSD 7.0 What am looking for is Load Balancing cluster + High Availability cluster Is SG Cluster Still active project ? [http://turtle.ee.ncku.edu.tw/sgcluster/ ] The Pico BSD mentioned in this page is very very old one. Features of SG Attracted me : { Manageable - It is very simple to install and a friendly web user interface is available to ease the administration. Single Image - It transparently clusters back-end servers running different platforms into a single system that appears as a single server to the client Scalable - The system service capacity can be increased by adding new servers to the cluster Load Balancing - It automatically routes incoming requests to the least loaded servers for optimal performance. Fault Tolerant - SG load balancer monitors the availability of back-end servers and only routes client's requests to those alive ones. More than one load balancers can be setup to avoid the single point of failure in the whole system. High Availability - SG cluster can mask the faults on load balancer or back-end servers if there are sufficient redundancies. It also keeps service available when doing system upgrad } But the package mentioned to setup is very very old. Any one having experience in Latest Clustering, please point me the Right URL. (Am very beginner) Applications am Willing to run in Very Large Scale are : Apache + PHP + MySQL + FastCGI + C++ Based Custom Web Based Application + PostgreSQL on Top of FreeBSD 7.0 Thanks in advance. -- // // Susanth K // // Knowledge is the only treasure that increase on sharing // From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 16:13:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC7916A417; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:13:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Peter.Ross@alumni.tu-berlin.de) Received: from qsrv03ps.mx.bigpond.com (qsrv03ps.mx.bigpond.com [144.140.82.183]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083CE13C467; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Peter.Ross@alumni.tu-berlin.de) Received: from oaamta05ps.mx.bigpond.com ([121.220.97.65]) by omta03ps.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20080114130255.CORG2997.omta03ps.mx.bigpond.com@oaamta05ps.mx.bigpond.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:02:55 +0000 Received: from klein.bigpond.com ([121.220.97.65]) by oaamta05ps.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20080114130254.HSRZ14439.oaamta05ps.mx.bigpond.com@klein.bigpond.com>; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:02:54 +0000 Received: from klein.bigpond.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by klein.bigpond.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m0ED2fbF003213; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:02:41 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from Peter.Ross@alumni.tu-berlin.de) Received: from localhost (petros@localhost) by klein.bigpond.com (8.14.1/8.14.1/Submit) with ESMTP id m0ED2dup003210; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:02:41 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from Peter.Ross@alumni.tu-berlin.de) X-Authentication-Warning: klein.bigpond.com: petros owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 00:02:39 +1100 (EST) From: Peter Ross X-X-Sender: petros@klein.bigpond.com To: Susanth K In-Reply-To: <6faf55220801140435u12963e89k70531ae963542f64@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080114235230.A3145@klein.bigpond.com> References: <6faf55220801140435u12963e89k70531ae963542f64@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which is the Latest Clustering Tools for FreeBSD7.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:13:15 -0000 Hi Susanth, On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Susanth K wrote: > Am Interested to know more about the Latest Clustering tools available in > FreeBSD 7.0 Me too;-) > Is SG Cluster Still active project ? [http://turtle.ee.ncku.edu.tw/sgcluster/ I don't know.. and have not used it. Sorry. > Applications am Willing to run in Very Large Scale are : > Apache + PHP + MySQL + FastCGI + C++ Based Custom Web Based Application + > PostgreSQL on Top of FreeBSD 7.0 At my work place we have (FreeBSD based) Juniper DXes as a frontend to Red Hat boxes. With "vanilla" FreeBSD I could think of CARP/VRRP and pf incl. pfsync for redundancy on packet layer and pound as a web frontend (does reverse proxy, loadbalancing and heart-beat to mark failed servers). I did this before. I never run MySQL and PostgreSQL clustered, just in master/slave replication mode. Clustering at my workplace is done using MS SQL. We start a bigger Drupal project I am keen to know what PostgreSQL and MySQL offer in this regard these days (the MS SQL support in Drupal is a bit dubious) Regards Peter From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 18:32:58 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA4E16A417 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:32:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raysonlogin@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F7A13C469 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:32:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raysonlogin@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id u52so3211014pyb.10 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:32:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=S58EaKnIXfmAid+2cag6/WBcqpi23SKozC6TrQFBOaU=; b=orsHw2ExgakbjMSiflGLSEpqCj6fP/kkkDV43CO356W6iZTgnFDc+x/UR5QDURNrkdvqDNZ6xmXVRZ1DRTdFJBceEQEenU1iRefp0or+t3VXwxsRoP4XV8yO7vwN5sOw52lVaBRq+vzU3a0XIm0pvG1Y6F3+B1i/wyNG4YMR14E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=t5cAopptOlBP2wnBDkhrO+GckB16WyLxDO6K22213eOnooWNg9rLQj/P455qKseTRH9oA6llZOGBq7K74chvy2eh3nHXeD6amw5jpYSf2PrOShynMMA5j4jmBOE+cn7ZeELUeehm6gucxUTKitK+IgVh8vOcS6eFP37wHX2eCQA= Received: by 10.35.21.9 with SMTP id y9mr8085787pyi.11.1200334098246; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:08:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.35.8.15 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:08:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <73a01bf20801141008k37baf431s87b21812c1c352bf@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 13:08:18 -0500 From: "Rayson Ho" To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <6faf55220801111826l5cfc0df6p33c10fb1321b2c90@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6faf55220801111826l5cfc0df6p33c10fb1321b2c90@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Which is the preferred clustering model X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:32:58 -0000 What kind of workload do you run?? Rayson On Jan 11, 2008 9:26 PM, Susanth K wrote: > Hi friends, > > Am new to freebsd, looking to know more about freebsd clustering. > > Which is the preferred way to make clusters for Performance, Load balancing > and High Availability > http://www.beowulf.org/ or > http://www.linux-ha.org/ or > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ or > ( any other option ) > > Please let me know if there exists any freebsd specific project for > clustering. > > And in which style should i develop application, so that to maximum utilize > the cluster power. [ like threads or Process Model ] > > Thanks in Advance :) > -- > // > // Susanth K > // > // Knowledge is the only treasure that increase on sharing > // > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cluster > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-cluster-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 14 18:33:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52AF216A417 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:33:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maciej@suszko.eu) Received: from 30.mail-out.ovh.net (30.mail-out.ovh.net [213.186.62.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F89013C465 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:33:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from maciej@suszko.eu) Received: (qmail 20572 invoked by uid 503); 14 Jan 2008 18:07:04 -0000 Received: (QMFILT: 1.0); 14 Jan 2008 18:07:04 -0000 Received: from gw2.ovh.net (HELO mail22.ha.ovh.net) (213.251.189.202) by 30.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 14 Jan 2008 18:07:04 -0000 Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queue-out) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 14 Jan 2008 18:06:38 -0000 Received: from 217-153-241-141.zab.nat.hnet.pl (HELO arsenic) (maciej@suszko.eu@217.153.241.141) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 14 Jan 2008 18:06:37 -0000 Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:06:38 +0100 From: Maciej Suszko To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20080114190638.c5399a01.maciej@suszko.eu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.8 (GTK+ 2.12.5; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Ovh-Remote: 217.153.241.141 (217-153-241-141.zab.nat.hnet.pl) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|H 0.50026/N Subject: ipvs + keepalived questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 18:33:23 -0000 Is there anyone using net/ipvs + net/keepalived on >= 6.2-RELEASE? I built both successfully on 7.0-RC1 and it seems working, but I'm wondering if it's worth more testing. Software itself is quite powerful but I'm afraid it can be unstable in production environment or low efficient. LVS on FreeBSD was tested on 5.4 on May/June 2005 and that's the lastest news on site: http://dragon.linux-vs.org/~dragonfly/htm/lvs_freebsd.htm Have you got any experience using it? -- regards, Maciej Suszko. From owner-freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 15 13:20:55 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216E116A417 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:20:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from susanthoffline@gmail.com) Received: from an-out-0708.google.com (an-out-0708.google.com [209.85.132.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B9D13C455 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:20:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from susanthoffline@gmail.com) Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id c14so646626anc.13 for ; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:20:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=53f6MI+cRyqO4WKdYhAaMOycFy9FVntB5IO1zbfMgWM=; b=RIibgNAnKpkeRw4ZqTd1Vc2RRFa8JfbFGagpNWjUmxSNH/gCWtF8J2smgKWgSMBHfv4/P77MFC7lmrSTUutAo6HLxaZuIf45xaBEpXrcbLyXdSEHKYRG+orX72dnspwq8bkxfUgvpDF1qnkJf/5ftfIoF/7kTfXM+zhlESbN7cY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=wdny0cRiweuxS3rOn1ASiLpeDCK3h/PhH76ymD1b5/MDra4s1s/BTNRgcQ/yqZOplQe+XB6wkFwJ+EhhU4u4WJgbctsuYVjkrkOvn/U8Fk/YXfBht/lOTSRJmhdxxxwbwzwE9yH7NTt1MKdpNhdkJ7xs1IpK6VigSu9Aji+KPb8= Received: by 10.100.112.6 with SMTP id k6mr16712063anc.110.1200403253887; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:20:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.6.10 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Jan 2008 05:20:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6faf55220801150520x66144c10sc4f57c029e01dcd5@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:50:53 +0530 From: "Susanth K" To: "Rayson Ho" , freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <73a01bf20801141008k37baf431s87b21812c1c352bf@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6faf55220801111826l5cfc0df6p33c10fb1321b2c90@mail.gmail.com> <73a01bf20801141008k37baf431s87b21812c1c352bf@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Which is the preferred clustering model X-BeenThere: freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Clustering FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 13:20:55 -0000 On 14/01/2008, Rayson Ho wrote: > > What kind of workload do you run?? I would like to run Apache, MySQL, PostgreSQL, PHP, and FastCGI mode Custom Transaction Finance Critical C++ Application [ PostgreSQL as DB ] The Volume of Simultaneous users may be beyond 60M Users Per Minute. So i would like the System to be redundant + load banance On Jan 11, 2008 9:26 PM, Susanth K wrote: > > Hi friends, > > > > Am new to freebsd, looking to know more about freebsd clustering. > > > > Which is the preferred way to make clusters for Performance, Load > balancing > > and High Availability > > http://www.beowulf.org/ or > > http://www.linux-ha.org/ or > > http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org/ or > > ( any other option ) > > > > Please let me know if there exists any freebsd specific project for > > clustering. > > > > And in which style should i develop application, so that to maximum > utilize > > the cluster power. [ like threads or Process Model ] > > > > Thanks in Advance :) > -- // // Susanth K // // Knowledge is the only treasure that increase on sharing //