From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 19 02:09:32 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61649106564A for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 02:09:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 377378FC08 for ; Sun, 19 Jul 2009 02:09:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB323B93C1; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:09:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:09:31 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: Qybq6gWiiCzGKGoKWCgXQNoTWPZww82Y+Vlt8Ml+LmON 1247969371 Received: from [192.168.123.18] (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2FE8BA089; Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:09:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4A628056.60009@incunabulum.net> Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 03:09:26 +0100 From: Bruce Simpson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pieter de Goeje References: <200907182056.47383.pieter@degoeje.nl> In-Reply-To: <200907182056.47383.pieter@degoeje.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sending multicast datagrams broken (regression) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 02:09:32 -0000 Pieter de Goeje wrote: > I'm observing that multicast IPv4 UDP datagrams sent from the latest 8.0-BETA2 > are being discarded. The code below used to work with 7.2. > Can you tcpdump this? This may be related to an llentry related regression which Xin Li recently posted a patch for, it appears that layer 2 addresses for multicast/broadcast datagrams may be broken in 8.0-BETA2. Although I haven't tested this myself since committing the SSM code around April, where I observed such traffic was correct. thanks BMS