From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 11:05:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4B7106567B for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from decke@bluelife.at) Received: from groupware.itac.at (groupware.itac.at [91.205.172.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7198FC18 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:05:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.bluelife.at (93.104.210.95) by groupware.itac.at (Axigen) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 0D1E50; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:05:34 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:05:34 +0200 From: Bernhard Froehlich To: Tobias Oberstein In-Reply-To: <634914A010D0B943A035D226786325D422B64120E5@EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net> References: <634914A010D0B943A035D226786325D422B64120E5@EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net> Message-ID: <977389f91bc1fbdb0c9a85db243e210c@bluelife.at> X-Sender: decke@bluelife.at User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.5.1 X-AxigenSpam-Level: 1 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B020B.4D99A5FE.0016,ss=1,fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VBox 4.0.4 testing : keyboard layout issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 11:05:35 -0000 On Mon, 28 Mar 2011 16:46:23 -0700, Tobias Oberstein wrote: > I am testing > > https://svn.bluelife.at/nightlies/virtualbox-port-r1273.tar.gz > > on FreeBSD 8.2 amd64. > > So far, both a Windows XP SP2 (vdi imported from other machine) and a > Ubuntu 10.10 (fresh install) guest seems to work great. Both with VT > etc enabled (the host is a Core7 Intel). > > I've built only headless (only VNC and VDE support in the ports > config) and start stuff > > VBoxHeadless -n -s buildslave_winxp_vc2010 > > and access from Windows with TightVNC or VNC Viewer (Real VNC). > > Problem is with keyboard map: it is weird .. I am using a german > keyboard, y and z are swapped, but the real annoyance are "funny" > chars like {/$- etc etc. (it's not like the "usual" mixup when running > german kbd with US map .. ) Sounds a bit weird. We had some similar reports where VNC seems to filter a few of the keys but nothing yet about mixing them up. > I tried to config the port with NLS .. but it says that required Qt > which I don't have/want on that machine. I guess that won't help because NLS is for translations of the Qt GUI only. > Am I expected to do s.th. different or is there anything I can do/try? No it should just work but I admit that i haven't tested it for quite a few months. Does it work fine in virtualbox 3.2.x ? Probably it's some upstream bug because they changed quite a lot in that area and it's contributed code. > Anyway .. really nice to have that port, > Tobias > > > libvncserver-0.9.7_2 Provide an easy API to write one's own vnc server > > vde2-2.3.1 User-mode virtual ethernet infrastructure > virtualbox-ose-4.0.4 A general-purpose full virtualizer for x86 hardware > virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.0.4 VirtualBox kernel module for FreeBSD > > sf0# uname -v > FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #0: Thu Feb 17 02:41:51 UTC 2011 > root@mason.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC -- Bernhard Fröhlich http://www.bluelife.at/ From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 11:06:58 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3011065686 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:06:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B02E8FC22 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:06:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p34B6wuI028581 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:06:58 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p34B6v0H028579 for freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:06:57 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:06:57 GMT Message-Id: <201104041106.p34B6v0H028579@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 11:06:58 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/155577 emulation [boot] BTX halted after install. Reboot during install o kern/155238 emulation 20 minute time jumps in VirtualBox o kern/155040 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux recvfrom doesn't handle proto fa o kern/153990 emulation [hyper-v]: Will not install into Hyper-V on Server 200 o kern/153887 emulation [linux] Linux emulator not understand STB_GNU_UNIQUE b o kern/153243 emulation [ibcs2] Seg fault whne running COFF binary using iBCS2 o ports/151714 emulation print/acroread9 not usable due to lack of support in t a bin/150262 emulation [patch] truss(1) -f doesn't follow descendants of the a kern/150186 emulation [parallels] [panic] Parallels Desktop: CDROM disconnec o ports/148097 emulation [patch] suggested addition to linux_base-* packages to o ports/148096 emulation emulators/linux_base-* can not be built from ports on o kern/147793 emulation [vmware] [panic] cdrom handling, panic, possible race o kern/146237 emulation [linux] Linux binaries not reading directories mounted f kern/144763 emulation [linux] [panic] Kernel panic when start linux binaries p kern/144584 emulation [linprocfs][patch] bogus values in linprocfs o ports/142837 emulation [patch] emulators/linux_base-* packages fails to insta o kern/140156 emulation [linux] cdparanoia fails to read drive data f kern/138944 emulation [parallels] [regression] Parallels no longer works in o kern/138880 emulation [linux] munmap segfaults after linux_mmap2 stresstest s ports/136321 emulation x11-toolkits/linux-pango: please update linux based po o ports/135337 emulation [PATCH] emulators/linux_base-f10: incorrect bash usage s kern/133144 emulation [linux] linuxulator 2.6 crashes with nvidias libGL.so. o kern/129169 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux Emulation ENOTCONN error using n o kern/126232 emulation [linux] Linux ioctl TCGETS (0x5401) always fails o kern/86619 emulation [linux] linux emulator interacts oddly with cp a kern/72920 emulation [linux]: path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain s o kern/41543 emulation [patch] [request] easier wine/w23 support o kern/39201 emulation [linux] [patch] ptrace(2) and rfork(RFLINUXTHPN) confu o kern/36952 emulation [patch] [linux] ldd(1) command of linux does not work o kern/21463 emulation [linux] Linux compatability mode should not allow setu o kern/11165 emulation [ibcs2] IBCS2 doesn't work correctly with PID_MAX 9999 31 problems total. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 5 20:17:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id 97633106566C; Tue, 5 Apr 2011 20:17:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 20:17:17 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110405201717.GA77584@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: firefox 4 linux binary crashing with plugins X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 20:17:17 -0000 hi there, i downloaded the firefox 4 linux binary and it seems to work quite well even though it depends upon the not yet implemented syscall epoll_create. however when executing native linux plugins (i.e. flash or quake live), ff crashes. can anybody reproduce these crashes as well? cheers. alex ps: this is under amd64 HEAD. -- a13x From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 13:37:22 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC980106566C for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:37:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721C58FC12 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:37:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (p5B1561B0.dip.t-dialin.net [91.21.97.176]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91CFC844018; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:37:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.Leidinger.net [IPv6:fd73:10c7:2053:1::2:102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97EA2155D; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:37:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.14.4/8.13.8/Submit) id p36DbEH7035626; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:37:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.ec.europa.eu (pslux.ec.europa.eu [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:37:14 +0200 Message-ID: <20110406153714.44611dhzci19qv0g@webmail.leidinger.net> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:37:14 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: emulation@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Dynamic Internet Messaging Program (DIMP) H3 (1.1.6) X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 91CFC844018.AFED8 X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0, required 6, autolearn=disabled) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1302701837.76133@mJSQnybSg57xqWzoyc9rBg X-EBL-Spam-Status: No Cc: bsam@FreeBSD.org Subject: CFR: removal of old cruft in bsd.linux*.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 13:37:22 -0000 Hi, now that the deprecated linux ports are not anymore in the ports collection, we can clean up bsd.linux*.mk (basically removing traces of everything not fc4 or f10). A patch is at http://www.Leidinger.net/FreeBSD/port-patches/linux-mk.diff Would be nice if someone could review it so that I can share the pointyhat in case I overlooked something. ;-) Bye, Alexander. -- Programmers do it bit by bit. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 15:07:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC155106566B for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:07:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71D38FC12 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gate.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.123] helo=h30.sp.ipt.ru) by services.ipt.ru with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1Q7Tt9-000Jnr-IF; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 18:39:19 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov To: Alexander Leidinger References: <20110406153714.44611dhzci19qv0g@webmail.leidinger.net> Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 18:39:19 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20110406153714.44611dhzci19qv0g@webmail.leidinger.net> (Alexander Leidinger's message of "Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:37:14 +0200") Message-ID: <83392232@h30.sp.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: CFR: removal of old cruft in bsd.linux*.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:07:42 -0000 Hi, On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:37:14 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > now that the deprecated linux ports are not anymore in the ports > collection, we can clean up bsd.linux*.mk (basically removing traces > of everything not fc4 or f10). > A patch is at > http://www.Leidinger.net/FreeBSD/port-patches/linux-mk.diff Look good to me. > Would be nice if someone could review it so that I can share the > pointyhat in case I overlooked something. ;-) Count me in. ;-) -- WBR, bsam From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 16:11:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794D6106566C; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:11:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDDD38FC15; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:11:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so1598642bwz.13 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 09:11:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hv00MOEZlCbJhXIBqj0UivpE/Q/EBOjH9aqQbOYaoi8=; b=iqX9S0TZNJc1/Y7JiyM99eoBFJF5F7cEwP3h8p8c33UVKORBf+zWOZ1VNirG1xyZ3X 5bq2KksBvNV+TxgiL9k/TNhRsQj0vNnMvAgEsMnLwA42xr+O2FPVdYK4awxAyhcRJm+m hA3Cv+uh75yKqe4evU+7BbVZYq/wrAZQs8Wq8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=H/IEcluIKFCPD4lwVTgApnJm2vVpnLhnCXSkjQrnu2dezApvl8MnlxerV3KEkAJMc7 GDdUt5PmuXi16xMcNTaRAKHCm13U/NKUlT1UikNBz6uWQw9pFQn2shWGUNXUFJGwsuaM mh/PH25hQ8XpRUhpPGIxC/PV/yK+rjt5T390o= Received: by 10.204.126.148 with SMTP id c20mr991184bks.87.1302104549102; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 08:42:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ernst.jennejohn.org (p578E31D4.dip.t-dialin.net [87.142.49.212]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t1sm442312bkx.19.2011.04.06.08.42.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 06 Apr 2011 08:42:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 17:42:24 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Alexander Leidinger Message-ID: <20110406174224.39084d55@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20110406153714.44611dhzci19qv0g@webmail.leidinger.net> References: <20110406153714.44611dhzci19qv0g@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.18.7; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org, bsam@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: CFR: removal of old cruft in bsd.linux*.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gljennjohn@googlemail.com List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 16:11:13 -0000 On Wed, 06 Apr 2011 15:37:14 +0200 Alexander Leidinger wrote: > now that the deprecated linux ports are not anymore in the ports > collection, we can clean up bsd.linux*.mk (basically removing traces > of everything not fc4 or f10). > > A patch is at > http://www.Leidinger.net/FreeBSD/port-patches/linux-mk.diff > > Would be nice if someone could review it so that I can share the > pointyhat in case I overlooked something. ;-) > Looks OK to me. -- Gary Jennejohn (gj@) From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 14:45:48 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C3B106566B for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:45:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jandrese@vt.edu) Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu (lennier.cc.vt.edu [198.82.162.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194E18FC13 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:45:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zidane.cc.vt.edu (zidane.cc.vt.edu [198.82.163.227]) by lennier.cc.vt.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p38Ej7Q8024018 for ; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:45:17 -0400 Received: from mail-qw0-f52.google.com (EHLO mail-qw0-f52.google.com) ([209.85.216.52]) by zidane.cc.vt.edu (MOS 4.2.2-FCS FastPath queued) with ESMTP id ORR85016; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 10:45:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qw0-f52.google.com with SMTP id 8so3043805qwb.25 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 07:45:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.141.11 with SMTP id k11mr1802162qcu.195.1302273916744; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 07:45:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from escaflowne.ceyah.org (pool-96-241-179-120.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.241.179.120]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g28sm1965093qck.39.2011.04.08.07.45.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 08 Apr 2011 07:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 10:45:11 -0400 From: Jason Andresen To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20110408104511.3875f57d.jandrese@vt.edu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.0 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 209.85.216.52 mail-qw0-f52.google.com jandrese@vt.edu 4 softfail X-Mirapoint-IP-Reputation: reputation=Fair-1, source=Queried, refid=tid=0001.0A020301.4D9F1950.01BA, actions=DELAY SPF TAG X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=zidane.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A02020A.4D9F1F7D.0066,ss=1,fgs=0, ip=96.241.179.120, so=2010-07-22 22:03:31, dmn=2009-09-10 00:05:08, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Subject: Linking problem with Linuxulator Java and shared libraries X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 14:45:48 -0000 I have been trying to get Minecraft working with the linux-sun-jre because it is known broken with the FreeBSD jre, but running into a persistent problem trying to link in the shared libraries it needs to run. I can't tell if it's because I'm using the Linuxulator or if I've just missed something obvious, but it seems to try to link in a library it downloads ($HOME/.minecraft/bin/natives/liblwgl.so), and fails for some reason. I've tried doing a ktrace on it, but it didn't catch the right thread. I'm running this with a linux bash shell just to make sure the system knows I want it to use the Linuxulator. I've even done an ldd on the library to see if it was missing any dependancies (it depends against some java libraries, but everything seems to be in place). Every time I run it however, I get this: Exception in thread "Minecraft main thread" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: Can't load library: /home/jandrese/.minecraft/bin/natives/liblwjgl.so at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Runtime.load0(Unknown Source) at java.lang.System.load(Unknown Source) at org.lwjgl.Sys$1.run(Sys.java:69) at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method) at org.lwjgl.Sys.doLoadLibrary(Sys.java:65) at org.lwjgl.Sys.loadLibrary(Sys.java:81) at org.lwjgl.Sys.(Sys.java:98) at org.lwjgl.opengl.Display.(Display.java:132) at net.minecraft.client.Minecraft.a(SourceFile:219) at net.minecraft.client.Minecraft.run(SourceFile:638) at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source) Killed Does anybody know anything else I can try? I tried setting the LD_LIBRARY_PATH, but that didn't help. I've verified that libGL is installed and works with Linux (can run Doom3, etc...). Is there any way to get more precise debugging out of Java? The debug modes didn't appear to do anything useful, but I'm not an expert with it. I'm running FreeBSD 8.2 with the Fedora 10 runtime. -- \__/ Jason Andresen -- My opinions are my own. \__/19\__/1A\__/1B\__/ /21\ That's the thing about people who think they hate computers. /2C\ \__/ What they really hate is lousy programmers. __/3B\__/ /41\ -- Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle in "Oath of Fealty" /4B\__/4C\ \__/51\__/52\__/53\__/54\__/55\__/56\__/57\__/58\__/59\__/5A\__/5B\__/ From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 8 22:27:34 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0A11065673; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 22:27:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grarpamp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com (mail-pw0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00FD78FC19; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 22:27:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwj8 with SMTP id 8so1850627pwj.13 for ; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 15:27:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=cTRauJt4bXEdmEoujc93QaxuThG5p27rmahqDqRMEyE=; b=Jlj8DQHOf5KMqgFyqr8McY/6FKLNB55JgWyKyCAz0SEtDbIkXU4q/HrHYQQmdbk8ZY 2iZML3TNxFAqbH8te7uEgeRuk+JDZCNCYr6vamGTyP55chlp23t/12/Vb2/0HWq7T55/ lEzCGyg3QpYiUKkvRlPtHyzXfKCrIjBXwwKqs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=xoRcQt47AcJfCKA66u+xLNZEoCcz0PeLrS48PgvizBVegVdLGqW/EifXcW9Kc1q7AH CG59BzO+LesO9mUEWAK2qVrECpouqN5efknG/DYr/rY20I7/tAKC/yjb9HBNQRI+fnMP 6c3U/MQjz9z4kXYCmPC+OHvJOJneUzdxsxlUE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.63.6 with SMTP id l6mr2302275wfa.178.1302300103380; Fri, 08 Apr 2011 15:01:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.154.5 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Apr 2011 15:01:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2011 18:01:43 -0400 Message-ID: From: grarpamp To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Android SDK X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 22:27:34 -0000 Is anyone out there using the SDK under FreeBSD? Is there a port of the source somewhere? Preferably of 2.3.3? ie: not linuxulated http://developer.android.com/sdk/index.html http://source.android.com/source/index.html http://code.google.com/android/add-ons/google-apis/index.html I've found a couple projects, yet as this is new area to me it's not easy to discern their scope/status. Any others? http://bsdroid.org/tiki-index.php http://gitorious.org/freebroid From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 13:10:57 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FC3106566C for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 13:10:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tobias.oberstein@tavendo.de) Received: from EXHUB020-4.exch020.serverdata.net (exhub020-4.exch020.serverdata.net [206.225.164.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C45E8FC0A for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 13:10:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net ([169.254.3.111]) by EXHUB020-4.exch020.serverdata.net ([206.225.164.31]) with mapi; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 06:10:28 -0700 From: Tobias Oberstein To: Bernhard Froehlich Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 06:10:46 -0700 Thread-Topic: VBox 4.0.4 testing : keyboard layout issue Thread-Index: AcvyuDM9ygISUmOFQ+qXXth8UGxAMgD/eWCQ Message-ID: <634914A010D0B943A035D226786325D422B7561FFC@EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net> References: <634914A010D0B943A035D226786325D422B64120E5@EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net> <977389f91bc1fbdb0c9a85db243e210c@bluelife.at> In-Reply-To: <977389f91bc1fbdb0c9a85db243e210c@bluelife.at> Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US Content-Language: de-DE X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: de-DE, en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org" Subject: AW: VBox 4.0.4 testing : keyboard layout issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:10:57 -0000 SGVsbG8gQmVybmhhcmQsDQoNCj4gTm8gaXQgc2hvdWxkIGp1c3Qgd29yayBidXQgSSBhZG1pdCB0 aGF0IGkgaGF2ZW4ndCB0ZXN0ZWQgaXQgZm9yIHF1aXRlIGEgZmV3DQo+IG1vbnRocy4gRG9lcyBp dCB3b3JrIGZpbmUgaW4gdmlydHVhbGJveCAzLjIueCA/IFByb2JhYmx5IGl0J3Mgc29tZSB1cHN0 cmVhbQ0KDQpJIGRpZCBub3QgdGVzdCBpdCB3aXRoIDMueCwgYmVjYXVzZSB3ZSBuZWVkIDQueCAu Lg0KDQo+IGJ1ZyBiZWNhdXNlIHRoZXkgY2hhbmdlZCBxdWl0ZSBhIGxvdCBpbiB0aGF0IGFyZWEg YW5kIGl0J3MgY29udHJpYnV0ZWQgY29kZS4NCj4gDQoNCm9rLiBJIHNlZS4NCg0KV291bGQgeW91 IGhhdmUgdGltZSAvIGJlIHdpbGxpbmcgdG8gYWNjZXB0IGEgc21hbGwgc3BvbnNvcnNoaXAgdG8g Zml4IHRoZSBpc3N1ZSAtIHJlZ2FyZGxlc3MgaWYgaXQncyB1cHN0cmVhbSBvciBhIHBvcnQgaXNz dWU/IElmIHNvLCBzZW5kIG1lIGEgcHJpdmF0ZSBtYWlsIC4uIHdvdWxkIGJlIGNvb2w7KQ0KDQpD aGVlcnMsDQpUb2JpYXMNCg== From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 15:56:44 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45CF1065670 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 15:56:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from mailgw.es.net (mail1.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:201:1::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0BE8FC0C for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 15:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:910::29]) by mailgw.es.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p39FuePY008789 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 9 Apr 2011 08:56:41 -0700 Received: from ptavv.es.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id CB5B81CC0D; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 08:56:40 -0700 (PDT) To: Tobias Oberstein In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 09 Apr 2011 06:10:46 PDT." <634914A010D0B943A035D226786325D422B7561FFC@EXVMBX020-12.exch020.serverdata.net> Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 08:56:40 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20110409155640.CB5B81CC0D@ptavv.es.net> Cc: Bernhard Froehlich , "freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: AW: VBox 4.0.4 testing : keyboard layout issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 15:56:44 -0000 > From: Tobias Oberstein > Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 06:10:46 -0700 > Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org > > Hello Bernhard, > > > No it should just work but I admit that i haven't tested it for quite a few > > months. Does it work fine in virtualbox 3.2.x ? Probably it's some upstream > > I did not test it with 3.x, because we need 4.x .. > > > bug because they changed quite a lot in that area and it's contributed code. > > > > ok. I see. > > Would you have time / be willing to accept a small sponsorship to fix > the issue - regardless if it's upstream or a port issue? If so, send > me a private mail .. would be cool;) I am not at all comfortable with 4.0.4 on the up-stream side. I have it installed on my personal Windows7 system (previously running 3.2.12 with an Ubuntu client and I a seeing the keyboard lock-ups there. I ma also having LOT of crashes of the VM. I just get a Win7 popup telling my that the VM has unexpectedly exited and do I want to report it to Microsoft. After the stability of the v3 B, this is very disappointing. I'll admit to being very nervous about 4.0.4. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 15:59:09 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47A2106564A; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 15:59:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris.richardson.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3154C8FC20; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 15:59:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwk4 with SMTP id 4so1418451wwk.1 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 08:59:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=gZPTCj7bUeaPzYlATgyoA/xmNwrFUq00/YTEldw4bMg=; b=rC0k/s2VIrqahs38p+ia8VCdigpbMp1PHopsp2kPrNCAUxPQ7QIKuoTsShWMMBLtdk smsNvJ6+YMTJVXKVchVQFIh4GYKUjNiCa+5VII3YR1/qLblgV9Pk8DX4g5y2o+nHPo24 Pe63Ed64uPA/RqR+U+0qeUYl4ikmgyA7cugaQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=u5hQ/OJf1vyjqv5u1UFckyKIUU8Eca6dOxSY3bo55gcvUpbPI3VXH2lV0PmoIXl0WA I727IEPWDVFbYB9DeW5OiKGF/280LZmWNawZ597F6qsihyomHmPdxtIxGDqoYzDAHzpu ZTG2BffeULs9h7ZvYKP3RV47hf02cnaySEYjo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.131.23 with SMTP id v23mr3374316wbs.53.1302363096212; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 08:31:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.143.133 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 08:31:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 17:31:36 +0200 Message-ID: From: Chris Richardson To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Kernel Tracking Question.. regarding kernel and boot files X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 15:59:10 -0000 Hi all, I am totally new to FreeBSD. I was involved within project which will trace the kernel. I used ktrace but I could not get appropriate results about the files being opened. I don't see any of the boot files boot0-1 or 2 in the ktrace.out file. Where did they go? Is ktrace the best "trace suite" for freebsd kernel? What about going through source code .. Is it better to use Combination of Ecllipse/Qemu and FreeBSD Source tree? Does this method will provide us with someway to see how booting process invokes the kernel to memory ? Any help will be appreciated. Yours, Chris From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 16:59:50 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255D4106564A for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 16:59:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCAD18FC0C for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 16:59:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywf9 with SMTP id 9so2059245ywf.13 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 09:59:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.177.6 with SMTP id c6mr4023353yhm.431.1302366918277; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 09:35:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from papi.localnet ([187.112.4.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h74sm1647577yhm.11.2011.04.09.09.35.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 09 Apr 2011 09:35:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 13:34:43 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <20110409155640.CB5B81CC0D@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: <20110409155640.CB5B81CC0D@ptavv.es.net> X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201104091334.43547.lobo@bsd.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: AW: VBox 4.0.4 testing : keyboard layout issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 16:59:50 -0000 On Saturday 09 April 2011 12:56:40 Kevin Oberman wrote: > > From: Tobias Oberstein > > Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 06:10:46 -0700 > > Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org > > > > Hello Bernhard, > > > > > No it should just work but I admit that i haven't tested it for quite a > > > few months. Does it work fine in virtualbox 3.2.x ? Probably it's some > > > upstream > > > > I did not test it with 3.x, because we need 4.x .. > > > > > bug because they changed quite a lot in that area and it's contributed > > > code. > > > > ok. I see. > > > > Would you have time / be willing to accept a small sponsorship to fix > > the issue - regardless if it's upstream or a port issue? If so, send > > me a private mail .. would be cool;) > > I am not at all comfortable with 4.0.4 on the up-stream side. I have it > installed on my personal Windows7 system (previously running 3.2.12 with > an Ubuntu client and I a seeing the keyboard lock-ups there. > > I ma also having LOT of crashes of the VM. I just get a Win7 popup > telling my that the VM has unexpectedly exited and do I want to report > it to Microsoft. After the stability of the v3 B, this is very > disappointing. > > I'll admit to being very nervous about 4.0.4. Man, besides a few resolved problems with previous nvidia drivers and vbox 3.x, I am yet to see issues on VBox and FBSD amd64 host! I am using the 4.0.5 devel port now and I'm running all sorts of guest OSes inside of it, with the SAME .vdi files of my first VBox install! Here is a list of my guests: Win7 (32&64) XP (2) Win2003 (4) Leopard OSx retail snow-leopard 10.6.7 (updated!) Fedora Debian OS-2 Of course not all of these are here since VBox day one. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 19:26:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EDE1065676; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:26:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496A88FC0C; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p39JQnPC092245; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:26:49 GMT (envelope-from linimon@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p39JQnYT092241; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:26:49 GMT (envelope-from linimon) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:26:49 GMT Message-Id: <201104091926.p39JQnYT092241@freefall.freebsd.org> To: john@feith.com, linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org From: linimon@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/155903: [emulation] [patch] FreeBSD32 emulation patch to support i386 X11 Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 19:26:49 -0000 Old Synopsis: FreeBSD32 emulation patch to support i386 X11 Server New Synopsis: [emulation] [patch] FreeBSD32 emulation patch to support i386 X11 Server State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback State-Changed-By: linimon State-Changed-When: Sat Apr 9 19:25:57 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: reclassify, and note feedback was requested. Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-amd64->freebsd-emulation Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Apr 9 19:25:57 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=155903 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 19:30:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57651106564A for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6108FC0A for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p39JUMks093081 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:30:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p39JUMnE093069; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:30:22 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:30:22 GMT Message-Id: <201104091930.p39JUMnE093069@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org From: Mark Linimon Cc: Subject: Re: kern/155903: FreeBSD32 emulation patch to support i386 X11 Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mark Linimon List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 19:30:23 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/155903; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Linimon To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/155903: FreeBSD32 emulation patch to support i386 X11 Server Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 14:27:22 -0500 ----- Forwarded message from John Wehle ----- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:26:08 -0400 (EDT) From: John Wehle To: kostikbel@gmail.com Cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64/155903: FreeBSD32 emulation patch to support i386 X11 Server > First, please split the patch into smaller, logically self-contained > parts. E.g. the change to handle fdrop() in one place should be committed > separately. Will do. Okay to just submit the series of patches under amd64/155903 or do you want them file under separate bug reports? > The last commit is the most controversial, in fact. I understand the > reason to get the user memory for calling into pciconf ioctls, but this > is somewhat ugly. Ideally, the pci_ioctl() would be changed into wrapper > and core code, and two wrappers produced, one for the native call path, > other for compat32. I don't necessarily disagree, however that's more work than I'm planning on at the moment. > BTW, would you do the shims for other pciconf ioctls, while there ? I would have if necesary (since I was there). However at a quick glance of pciio.h it didn't appear to me to be necessary. Also I do suspect that the i386 X11 Server is making successfuly use of some of the other calls. Keep in mind that the freebsd32 layer has generic handling for those ioctl calls that don't require anything special. I believe PCIOCREAD, PCIOCWRITE, and friends fall into that category since it appears the structures don't change size or alignment between i386 and amd64 (mind you this was based just on a quick glance at the header). -- John ------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Feith Systems | Voice: 1-215-646-8000 | Email: john@feith.com | | John Wehle | Fax: 1-215-540-5495 | | ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- End forwarded message ----- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 19:30:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80972106564A for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:30:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 541238FC0C for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p39JUR2d093451 for ; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:30:27 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p39JURKJ093444; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:30:27 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:30:27 GMT Message-Id: <201104091930.p39JURKJ093444@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org From: Mark Linimon Cc: Subject: Re: kern/155903: FreeBSD32 emulation patch to support i386 X11 Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mark Linimon List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 19:30:27 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/155903; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Linimon To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/155903: FreeBSD32 emulation patch to support i386 X11 Server Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 14:27:55 -0500 ----- Forwarded message from Kostik Belousov ----- Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 23:48:57 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov To: John Wehle Cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64/155903: FreeBSD32 emulation patch to support i386 X11 Server User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 05:26:08PM -0400, John Wehle wrote: > > First, please split the patch into smaller, logically self-contained > > parts. E.g. the change to handle fdrop() in one place should be committed > > separately. > > Will do. Okay to just submit the series of patches under amd64/155903 > or do you want them file under separate bug reports? Simply mail the patches to me, with some words attached. I will land them into the tree. > > > The last commit is the most controversial, in fact. I understand the > > reason to get the user memory for calling into pciconf ioctls, but this > > is somewhat ugly. Ideally, the pci_ioctl() would be changed into wrapper > > and core code, and two wrappers produced, one for the native call path, > > other for compat32. > > I don't necessarily disagree, however that's more work than I'm planning on > at the moment. Sigh. > > > BTW, would you do the shims for other pciconf ioctls, while there ? > > I would have if necesary (since I was there). However at a quick glance > of pciio.h it didn't appear to me to be necessary. Also I do suspect > that the i386 X11 Server is making successfuly use of some of the other > calls. > > Keep in mind that the freebsd32 layer has generic handling for those > ioctl calls that don't require anything special. I believe PCIOCREAD, > PCIOCWRITE, and friends fall into that category since it appears the > structures don't change size or alignment between i386 and amd64 > (mind you this was based just on a quick glance at the header). This is good answer, I wanted to make sure that ioctls that need special handling are handled. Thanks. ----- End forwarded message ----- From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 19:41:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB70106566B; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:41:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kib@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42AFF8FC08; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:41:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p39Jf6bq010239; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:41:06 GMT (envelope-from kib@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from kib@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p39Jf6tZ010230; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:41:06 GMT (envelope-from kib) Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 19:41:06 GMT Message-Id: <201104091941.p39Jf6tZ010230@freefall.freebsd.org> To: john@feith.com, kib@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org, kib@FreeBSD.org From: kib@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/155903: [emulation] [patch] FreeBSD32 emulation patch to support i386 X11 Server X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 19:41:07 -0000 Synopsis: [emulation] [patch] FreeBSD32 emulation patch to support i386 X11 Server State-Changed-From-To: feedback->patched State-Changed-By: kib State-Changed-When: Sat Apr 9 19:40:31 UTC 2011 State-Changed-Why: Patches are in HEAD. Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-emulation->kib Responsible-Changed-By: kib Responsible-Changed-When: Sat Apr 9 19:40:31 UTC 2011 Responsible-Changed-Why: Patches are in HEAD. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=155903 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 21:35:35 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A149C106564A; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 21:35:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout019.mac.com (asmtpout019.mac.com [17.148.16.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8510B8FC0A; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 21:35:35 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from [10.1.2.92] ([173.200.187.194]) by asmtp019.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LJE005R1JU4HC70@asmtp019.mac.com>; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:34:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2011-04-09_07:2011-04-09, 2011-04-09, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=2 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1104090086 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 13:34:52 -0700 Message-id: References: To: Chris Richardson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel Tracking Question.. regarding kernel and boot files X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 21:35:35 -0000 Hi, Chris-- [ ...Reply-to: set to direct towards the most appropriate list... ] On Apr 9, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Chris Richardson wrote: > I am totally new to FreeBSD. I was involved within project which will > trace the kernel. I used ktrace but I could not get appropriate results > about the files being opened. I don't see any of the boot files boot0-1 or 2 > in the ktrace.out file. Where did they go? The bootstrap loader stages are what loads and runs the kernel. ktrace isn't available until afterwards, when the kernel is running. > Is ktrace the best "trace suite" for freebsd kernel? Kinda depends on what you are doing. Setting up good logging and making userland interfaces for getting to useful information (cf vmstat, ps, iostat, etc) is more likely to be useful over the longer run. > What about going through source code .. Is it better to > use Combination of Ecllipse/Qemu and FreeBSD Source tree? Eclipse is an editor. If you like it in particular, free free to use it, otherwise pick something else you'd prefer to use for C code. > Does this method will provide us with someway to see how booting process invokes > the kernel to memory ? Any help will be appreciated. You're asking about the process here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/boot-blocks.html ...? Frankly, none of these are especially big, start by reviewing the source code for 'em. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 9 21:51:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F498106564A; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 21:51:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris.richardson.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C1E8FC14; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 21:51:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so4504531wyf.13 for ; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 14:51:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Avn8NVJ548QWD/JwzOUFqKhBYWQC9I7oF7ndfZYoS/0=; b=GEWDFK4/kO5v9KASeEIAkFBODIGwcegtijq4BwqZmp3FpbKUINPE+/vmYXCBsFck3G tse5eHBDzP86WMllBcNKn/Xip6gpldFGPzotlBXlZPigWBZsac9OelXFjs4lA8AI/3OJ 8N8ihqxfieIYrXRGxZS8zucY5tJKVrrg3WSxg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=M3KnSH5C3QKM/nZ+xIrbPLt2i3NRbkf4WiEIz9D5dlklE3xMLXNtH+rDNJ6XGTRt4H odfe3O7sa828+lQkVh2f4ojp+ROod5I0NX0w4jJzryr306rw7E4GWBcxkxmW7MNx64i6 A7o361w8n+ARNCBJIuZ0VR6mShEKthepBfkrQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.157.68 with SMTP id a4mr3521839wbx.198.1302385878663; Sat, 09 Apr 2011 14:51:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.143.133 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Apr 2011 14:51:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 23:51:18 +0200 Message-ID: From: Chris Richardson To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, Chuck Swiger , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel Tracking Question.. regarding kernel and boot files X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 21:51:20 -0000 On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Chuck Swiger wrote: > Hi, Chris-- > > [ ...Reply-to: set to direct towards the most appropriate list... ] > > On Apr 9, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Chris Richardson wrote: > > I am totally new to FreeBSD. I was involved within project which will > > trace the kernel. I used ktrace but I could not get appropriate results > > about the files being opened. I don't see any of the boot files boot0-1 > or 2 > > in the ktrace.out file. Where did they go? > > The bootstrap loader stages are what loads and runs the kernel. > ktrace isn't available until afterwards, when the kernel is running. > > > Is ktrace the best "trace suite" for freebsd kernel? > > Kinda depends on what you are doing. Setting up good logging and making > userland > interfaces for getting to useful information (cf vmstat, ps, iostat, etc) > is > more likely to be useful over the longer run. > > What about if I wanna see the interaction between boot process and kernel loading. > > What about going through source code .. Is it better to > > use Combination of Ecllipse/Qemu and FreeBSD Source tree? > > Eclipse is an editor. If you like it in particular, free free to use it, > otherwise pick something else you'd prefer to use for C code. > > > Does this method will provide us with someway to see how booting process > invokes > > the kernel to memory ? Any help will be appreciated. > > You're asking about the process here: > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/boot-blocks.html > > ...? Frankly, none of these are especially big, start by reviewing the > source > code for 'em. > > Yeah. this file provides me with the stages in theoretical way. How about implementing it using qemu to emulate livecd to see what is going on boot0. Do you have an idea about that ? Good Luck, > Regards, > -- > -Chuck > > >