From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 2 04:12:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E9239E4 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 04:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from o3.shared.sendgrid.net (o3.shared.sendgrid.net [208.117.48.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D05F6EC8 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 04:12:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.info; h=from:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpapi; bh=ZY3c4V5UZdlRZzVcJBeBT0Jy0Z8=; b=sQ4pPZYjUxLbjNGKUU dHmwfKFLOAji4Le2MaukjPtIWvYTWNzcKJIYrKHdJZD19hM3YVcZDLMe3b8z/AOM jIQWDQQHvEUyx9j1LIcE/sV3rTzqph8Fq6HiOCFKmU01Vo3hWuWyMe4znS8XNunb Dl2fQXxM+8sqEagboBL0sVx5Y= Received: by mf85 with SMTP id mf85.19570.529C08C26 Mon, 02 Dec 2013 04:12:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.tarsnap.com (unknown [10.60.208.15]) by mi47 (SG) with ESMTP id 142b18238d7.46b9.10d2425 for ; Sun, 01 Dec 2013 22:12:50 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 3017 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2013 04:12:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by ec2-107-20-205-189.compute-1.amazonaws.com with ESMTP; 2 Dec 2013 04:12:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 20224 invoked from network); 2 Dec 2013 04:10:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by clamshell.daemonology.net with SMTP; 2 Dec 2013 04:10:15 -0000 Message-ID: <529C0827.4020003@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2013 20:10:15 -0800 From: Colin Percival User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" , jfv@freebsd.org Subject: Is ixgbe usable with SR-IOV? X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SG-EID: RUbAm5H8PjswBj/QH+sYVehaJogg3iBnZcyVi1bw/IxW+rO/P7BcbCJh1NmKDR2hFptSIOoQYfD7CEE7zDQ5O3rru4FxEbbpy7M8LgiUOhDi4eMighFmfJQeLq56pMfNXwrEZE1et+d33sP1Ypa2bvEEALEg6k386JYqRgnyh/U= X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 04:12:52 -0000 Hi Xen people & jfv, Amazon's new "C3" instance type has support for SR-IOV using ixgbe hardware; our driver looks like it should support this, but when I turn it on it doesn't seem to work. Boot dmesg: http://pastebin.com/1Kkpfzbi The virtual hardware is recognized: > ix0: mem 0xf3000000-0xf3003fff,0xf3004000-0xf3007fff at device 3.0 on pci0 > ix0: Using MSIX interrupts with 2 vectors > ix0: Ethernet address: 02:91:23:76:38:77 And we seem to be able to send packets, but never see any responses: > ix0: link state changed to UP > Starting Network: lo0 ix0. > lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > options=600003 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > nd6 options=21 > ix0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=401bb > ether 02:91:23:76:38:77 > nd6 options=29 > media: Ethernet autoselect > status: active > Starting devd. > Starting dhclient. > DHCPDISCOVER on ix0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 8 > DHCPDISCOVER on ix0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 12 > DHCPDISCOVER on ix0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 12 > DHCPDISCOVER on ix0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 9 > DHCPDISCOVER on ix0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 10 > DHCPDISCOVER on ix0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 10 > No DHCPOFFERS received. Under exactly the same Xen configuration except with SR-IOV turned off and EC2 presenting a Xen netback to us instead, the DHCP works just fine. Has anyone managed to use {FreeBSD, SR-IOV, ixgbe, Xen}? Was any magic necessary in order to make it work? -- Colin Percival Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 2 11:06:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EA9DC44 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:06:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00263196D for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rB2B6v1J007951 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:06:57 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rB2B6vCj007949 for freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:06:57 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:06:57 GMT Message-Id: <201312021106.rB2B6vCj007949@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:06:58 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/183139 xen [xen] [patch] ifconfig options on xn0 lost after xen v o kern/180788 xen [xen] [panic] XEN PV kernel 9.2-BETA1 panics on boot o kern/180403 xen [xen] Problems with GENERIC and XENHVM kernels with Xe o kern/180402 xen [xen] XEN kernel does not load in XenClient 4.5.5 o kern/179814 xen [xen] mountroot fails with error=19 under Xen on 9-STA o kern/176471 xen [xen] xn driver crash on detach o kern/176053 xen [xen] [patch] i386: Correct wrong usage of vsnprintf() o kern/175954 xen [xen] XENHVM xn network driver extreme packet loss dur o kern/175822 xen [xen] FreeBSD 9.1 does not work with Xen 4.0 o kern/175757 xen [xen] [patch] xen pvhvm looses keyboard input from VNC o kern/171873 xen [xen] xn network device floods warning in dmesg o kern/171118 xen [xen] FreeBSD XENHVM guest doesn't shutdown cleanly o kern/166174 xen [xen] Problems ROOT MOUNT ERROR o kern/165418 xen [xen] Problems mounting root filesystem from XENHVM o kern/164630 xen [xen] XEN HVM kernel: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: stil o kern/164450 xen [xen] Failed to install FreeeBSD 9.0-RELEASE from CD i o kern/162677 xen [xen] FreeBSD not compatible with "Current Stable Xen" o kern/161318 xen [xen] sysinstall crashes with floating point exception o kern/155468 xen [xen] Xen PV i386 multi-kernel CPU system is not worki o kern/155353 xen [xen] [patch] put "nudging TOD" message under boot_ver o kern/154833 xen [xen]: xen 4.0 - DomU freebsd8.2RC3 i386, XEN kernel. o kern/154473 xen [xen] xen 4.0 - DomU freebsd8.1 i386, XEN kernel. Not o kern/154472 xen [xen] xen 4.0 - DomU freebsd8.1 i386 xen kernel reboot o kern/154428 xen [xen] xn0 network interface and PF - Massive performan o kern/153674 xen [xen] i386/XEN idle thread shows wrong percentages o kern/153672 xen [xen] [panic] i386/XEN panics under heavy fork load o kern/153620 xen [xen] Xen guest system clock drifts in AWS EC2 (FreeBS o kern/153477 xen [xen] XEN pmap code abuses vm page queue lock o kern/153150 xen [xen] xen/ec2: disable checksum offloading on interfac o kern/152228 xen [xen] [panic] Xen/PV panic with machdep.idle_mwait=1 o kern/144629 xen [xen] FreeBSD 8-RELEASE XEN pvm networking doesn't wor o kern/143398 xen [xen] FreeBSD 8-RELEASE XEN pvm networking doesn't wor o kern/143340 xen [xen] FreeBSD 8-RELEASE XEN pvm networking doesn't wor f kern/143069 xen [xen] [panic] Xen Kernel Panic - Memory modified after f kern/135667 xen ufs filesystem corruption on XEN DomU system f kern/135421 xen [xen] FreeBSD Xen PVM DomU network failure - netfronc. f kern/135178 xen [xen] Xen domU outgoing data transfer stall when TSO i p kern/135069 xen [xen] FreeBSD-current/Xen SMP doesn't function at all f i386/124516 xen [xen] FreeBSD-CURRENT Xen Kernel Segfaults when config o kern/118734 xen [xen] FreeBSD 6.3-RC1 and FreeBSD 7.0-BETA 4 fail to b 40 problems total. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 2 16:12:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0CAE8D8; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 16:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SMTP.CITRIX.COM (smtp.citrix.com [66.165.176.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3AC4103C; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 16:12:03 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,811,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="79756661" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2013 16:11:51 +0000 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 11:11:51 -0500 Message-ID: <529CB145.6030404@citrix.com> Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:11:49 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: FreeBSD PVH guest support References: <526E6807.9030005@citrix.com> <527BD793.8010606@citrix.com> <527E24D8.4010403@citrix.com> <52864749.1020308@citrix.com> <528F9699.4060307@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <528F9699.4060307@citrix.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DLP: MIA2 Cc: emaste@freebsd.org, peter@FreeBSD.org, alc@FreeBSD.org, xen-devel , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Konstantin Belousov , "Justin T. Gibbs" X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 16:12:05 -0000 Hello, I've yet updated the PVH work one more time, regarding some comments from emaste in order to try to make this work easier to merge with the UEFI changes. In this regard, the parse_memmap hook now fetches and parses the memmap, so UEFI can define it's own hook and do the fetching and parsing there. As usual, the patch can be found on my git tree: git://xenbits.xen.org/people/royger/freebsd.git pvh_v6 Or http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=people/royger/freebsd.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/pvh_v6 I would really like to get this committed sooner rather than later, mainly because I plan to start working on Dom0 soon, and having to carry another patch on top of this is going to be quite hard. Roger. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 2 17:19:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 206DD627; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B44A215BF; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:19:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tom.home (kostik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rB2HJEOn002802; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 19:19:14 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 kib.kiev.ua rB2HJEOn002802 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rB2HJEvl002801; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 19:19:14 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 19:19:13 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Roger Pau Monn? Subject: Re: FreeBSD PVH guest support Message-ID: <20131202171913.GL59496@kib.kiev.ua> References: <526E6807.9030005@citrix.com> <527BD793.8010606@citrix.com> <527E24D8.4010403@citrix.com> <52864749.1020308@citrix.com> <528F9699.4060307@citrix.com> <529CB145.6030404@citrix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2b+TSQxcrVK82xr4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <529CB145.6030404@citrix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on tom.home Cc: emaste@freebsd.org, peter@FreeBSD.org, alc@FreeBSD.org, xen-devel , "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "Justin T. Gibbs" X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 17:19:21 -0000 --2b+TSQxcrVK82xr4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 05:11:49PM +0100, Roger Pau Monn? wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I've yet updated the PVH work one more time, regarding some comments > from emaste in order to try to make this work easier to merge with the > UEFI changes. In this regard, the parse_memmap hook now fetches and > parses the memmap, so UEFI can define it's own hook and do the fetching > and parsing there. >=20 > As usual, the patch can be found on my git tree: >=20 > git://xenbits.xen.org/people/royger/freebsd.git pvh_v6 >=20 > Or >=20 > http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=3Dpeople/royger/freebsd.git;a=3Dshortlog= ;h=3Drefs/heads/pvh_v6 >=20 > I would really like to get this committed sooner rather than later, > mainly because I plan to start working on Dom0 soon, and having to carry > another patch on top of this is going to be quite hard. The patch is large, and I definitely do not have desire to look at the Xen-specific parts. Is it possible to split the patch into changes for common code, and the rest ? If not, could you provide only the chunks related to the common code anyway, so that I read what needed to read, and do not miss some part ? --2b+TSQxcrVK82xr4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSnMERAAoJEJDCuSvBvK1BqUQP/0cHpHDot+G4X2cdn+t8tFl/ v0wdKt2z9kQTcWKGFRT5s3khJL9wzemDQnFiYCaXyQ1LP0k/1rveQb5kHeqC50HV 3v8tYsq8IQ5t9TZAsrBb2799Hq7iUT7harQHEX/mPIM9tMLnTmkSkLO9qgK6gQ2V 5z2yrE6vr8lnj1WMQUUrxK2apjFtCLXgDMkeF/F5gXkgiX6eBOqtPEPEhUX2AeAi M1XzLHDXLoHyJmlBOQ0LQ51x4ZFrumjQ+9mcMU8aLXYG2H9AuH04Al9WYddMapo7 s7EE/StmlF6ufWX34sOquEEtwAKFMefC9pCQSfERLR0/zucMeSkOT4LUdjrgD9+H KN4enDxbv1xRkG3A3DqJ+O5WHASmI2zJvQO8W7/jJxzqRX6L26X72+VMWei/RApD luBI0bocOwTffjjrxF95u75HOtMNEHcarbGN4kQqqysRUla4rPhuRnaiGL+lR5uE CzyCVeNeKY4YFLcM7KAhyKvqsayqjsj3JoIAJkgxE0yfCNapdAnTswjqllU8DOik 29cZxE/SIiOTuobylUtj881GVIf43S3nj76l6RSNXTxWdHVDL/okGQVhbPGzL6FN Ku3FHAS0MgVC7/ret8uZFB1IP1c93ejqr4F0M+b9l/MACb7e8f0V6yb1tVXPX1L0 HhrgKlHsFzRk3eQOZFgS =SqUe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2b+TSQxcrVK82xr4-- From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 2 17:58:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F907C6B; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:58:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SMTP02.CITRIX.COM (smtp02.citrix.com [66.165.176.63]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CEC71880; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 17:58:01 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,812,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="77415356" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL03.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO02.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2013 17:57:53 +0000 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.80) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:57:53 -0500 Message-ID: <529CCA1F.302@citrix.com> Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 18:57:51 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Konstantin Belousov Subject: Re: FreeBSD PVH guest support References: <526E6807.9030005@citrix.com> <527BD793.8010606@citrix.com> <527E24D8.4010403@citrix.com> <52864749.1020308@citrix.com> <528F9699.4060307@citrix.com> <529CB145.6030404@citrix.com> <20131202171913.GL59496@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <20131202171913.GL59496@kib.kiev.ua> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: emaste@freebsd.org, peter@FreeBSD.org, alc@FreeBSD.org, xen-devel , "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "Justin T. Gibbs" X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 17:58:04 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/12/13 18:19, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 05:11:49PM +0100, Roger Pau Monn? wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've yet updated the PVH work one more time, regarding some >> comments from emaste in order to try to make this work easier to >> merge with the UEFI changes. In this regard, the parse_memmap >> hook now fetches and parses the memmap, so UEFI can define it's >> own hook and do the fetching and parsing there. >> >> As usual, the patch can be found on my git tree: >> >> git://xenbits.xen.org/people/royger/freebsd.git pvh_v6 >> >> Or >> >> http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=people/royger/freebsd.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/pvh_v6 >> >> >> I would really like to get this committed sooner rather than later, >> mainly because I plan to start working on Dom0 soon, and having >> to carry another patch on top of this is going to be quite hard. > > The patch is large, and I definitely do not have desire to look at > the Xen-specific parts. Is it possible to split the patch into > changes for common code, and the rest ? If not, could you provide > only the chunks related to the common code anyway, so that I read > what needed to read, and do not miss some part ? You can certainly use http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=people/royger/freebsd.git;a=commit;h=e6b5f404ea805de4070a9ad501be8e91a722f05b in order to see the specific diffs for each modified file, this way you can only look at changes in common files and skip most of the Xen specific changes. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSnMofAAoJEKXZdqUyumTAzjUH/3fDf9TDgBbKJoOlgPGWhTc3 GDY9Vw2oRzfB7IAyNKGXesE5PPkl4S2A/VVxN/So9Jw1PdGwK/iUGNQIyR5jI5YW BOclDB42huRoHRPYXH/pDrdHpOKrudJg9GeXldT0Q+EXThDMKgTGuAekqdtSN6dS F8YtXMokMrIBkklCzTBsJLAhA8nAZ+CozLuIgHUelkY5XX8Zw7RhrAZNZWy6WZP5 nGgVL6eeJ1mQ6l8JLSwEAvo6mx7ka7HVLmx4IQ1Plm6nx17WLIUdJi9NI6tW7s5v LAD6BH+iPCxDOK6qDCVmSHAZ6RJmI+ksasqIRx4pAe02l806qAUsoXjyzymgn6Y= =ovkV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 2 22:11:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEAFA4DA for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 22:11:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.shrew.net (mx2.shrew.net [38.97.5.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DD631D7B for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 22:11:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.shrew.net (mail1.shrew.prv [10.22.204.21]) by mx2.shrew.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rB2M9eUI038474 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 16:09:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from mgrooms@shrew.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (216-110-21-66.static.twtelecom.net [216.110.21.66]) by mail.shrew.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDCA61819E for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 16:09:48 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <529D0561.1030201@shrew.net> Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 16:10:41 -0600 From: Matthew Grooms User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD PVH guest support References: <526E6807.9030005@citrix.com> <527BD793.8010606@citrix.com> <527E24D8.4010403@citrix.com> <52864749.1020308@citrix.com> <528F9699.4060307@citrix.com> <529CB145.6030404@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <529CB145.6030404@citrix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mx2.shrew.net [10.22.204.12]); Mon, 02 Dec 2013 16:09:41 -0600 (CST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 22:11:02 -0000 On 12/2/2013 10:11 AM, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > I would really like to get this committed sooner rather than later, > mainly because I plan to start working on Dom0 soon, and having to carry > another patch on top of this is going to be quite hard. > PVH dom0 support for FreeBSD would be fantastic! Many thanks for your work on this Roger. -Matthew From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 4 18:21:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63D40CF0; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:21:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ve0-x236.google.com (mail-ve0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF6B0153A; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:21:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f182.google.com with SMTP id jy13so12765193veb.27 for ; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 10:21:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=fdQv6jzgUPak/d+fNJ6bq5rblaG+DulSB71pFBX1vKE=; b=FK8aXIKkcbLrTqwigcyMeBteejuTjaMlapC7PkRfKrEA0sAsYRN2Qjyi0+rTVBqefb pkz3GjhN+97/TUAtgLfDCUPsyP3Q2mTtXBEJ386x86sx8C0O2hqO7eqvySwhPJq3sVAH XPDOOJ06i9a31Ja9SLki2xNP/xaZWlB8sYzVn2Qd6NAgo3cBZJe4QJ5pQ0OqJpasjI4v MihLNBddXPiwyiwORLh6c/x/GSbl1g/AILWZ3gFxRwf1dwWeQgS9IuFxzASOLHfnhvNl i4kpjUTu/u6g5cWKymi3pfP8GCJwyNY6xE3wLWoy8cxrHN+d2QIp0tioi5QmDGNmfIL2 EMPA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.164.16 with SMTP id ym16mr1641859vdb.39.1386181262139; Wed, 04 Dec 2013 10:21:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.155.147 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:21:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <529C0827.4020003@freebsd.org> References: <529C0827.4020003@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:21:02 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is ixgbe usable with SR-IOV? From: Jack Vogel To: Colin Percival Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: Jack F Vogel , "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 18:21:03 -0000 Yes, the ixv code was specifically written to work in a guest with SRIOV, however our internal testing did not use DHCP, what if you assign it an address, will it work then? Jack On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Colin Percival wrote: > Hi Xen people & jfv, > > Amazon's new "C3" instance type has support for SR-IOV using ixgbe > hardware; > our driver looks like it should support this, but when I turn it on it > doesn't > seem to work. Boot dmesg: http://pastebin.com/1Kkpfzbi > > The virtual hardware is recognized: > > ix0: 1.1.4> mem 0xf3000000-0xf3003fff,0xf3004000-0xf3007fff at device 3.0 on pci0 > > ix0: Using MSIX interrupts with 2 vectors > > ix0: Ethernet address: 02:91:23:76:38:77 > > And we seem to be able to send packets, but never see any responses: > > ix0: link state changed to UP > > Starting Network: lo0 ix0. > > lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > > options=600003 > > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > > nd6 options=21 > > ix0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > > > options=401bb > > ether 02:91:23:76:38:77 > > nd6 options=29 > > media: Ethernet autoselect > > status: active > > Starting devd. > > Starting dhclient. > > DHCPDISCOVER on ix0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 8 > > DHCPDISCOVER on ix0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 12 > > DHCPDISCOVER on ix0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 12 > > DHCPDISCOVER on ix0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 9 > > DHCPDISCOVER on ix0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 10 > > DHCPDISCOVER on ix0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 10 > > No DHCPOFFERS received. > > Under exactly the same Xen configuration except with SR-IOV turned off and > EC2 presenting a Xen netback to us instead, the DHCP works just fine. > > Has anyone managed to use {FreeBSD, SR-IOV, ixgbe, Xen}? Was any magic > necessary in order to make it work? > > -- > Colin Percival > Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve > Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid > From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 5 06:16:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E88CF1D1 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 06:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from o3.shared.sendgrid.net (o3.shared.sendgrid.net [208.117.48.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 930B91009 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 06:16:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.info; h=from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpapi; bh=+nzudtymHfF7eiGs4qdt1qXb5N0=; b=Z0vKdM0RkzbjUvnJuY N1I2Mo1x9Ru2c3O0Iy5oAolnku5rKNfrf0WItxJ7AUgtqYDQCpDLRkld+G3Mm503 y4XrFq/LIFvhXSAgiX5dWl6N833fWZtysUqm6gVZs4DmesDFx2YjAM8ySt0sQwgQ nOCDEoUO+z+bsfr29quB/hOOs= Received: by mf121.sendgrid.net with SMTP id mf121.4172.52A01A252 Thu, 05 Dec 2013 06:16:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.tarsnap.com (unknown [10.60.208.15]) by mi93 (SG) with ESMTP id 142c166237f.3307.2290c for ; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 00:16:05 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 46678 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2013 06:16:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by ec2-107-20-205-189.compute-1.amazonaws.com with ESMTP; 5 Dec 2013 06:16:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 13438 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2013 06:13:32 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by clamshell.daemonology.net with SMTP; 5 Dec 2013 06:13:32 -0000 Message-ID: <52A0198C.6060306@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2013 22:13:32 -0800 From: Colin Percival User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jack Vogel Subject: Re: Is ixgbe usable with SR-IOV? References: <529C0827.4020003@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SG-EID: RUbAm5H8PjswBj/QH+sYVehaJogg3iBnZcyVi1bw/IyRc9oj0APGZVapPt11PeXVNuFwrGeZZuSH+MB0YeiXDPOWgJeGRiW+KQcyP0YcwFpveXGdkv1T7yGT7H/LDoQK1CBAfcQVG3NxMFHr7sNmnavImldX4Y5Sy/TKdl8KtmY= Cc: Jack F Vogel , "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 06:16:08 -0000 Hi Jack, On 12/04/13 10:21, Jack Vogel wrote: > Yes, the ixv code was specifically written to work in a guest with SRIOV, however > our internal testing did not use DHCP, what if you assign it an address, will it > work then? Hard-coding an IP address doesn't work either. Or rather, I can assign it an address, but it continues to not pass packets. Are there any diagnostic tunables/sysctls I should try turning on? Since this is in EC2 I'm unfortunately limited to "printf-style" debugging. -- Colin Percival Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 5 08:18:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04E0032F; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:18:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ve0-x230.google.com (mail-ve0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 903E416BA; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:18:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f176.google.com with SMTP id oz11so13075198veb.7 for ; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 00:18:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=oydu18X6BteAi6Le7HRT7uYKRz+h2nUlFuf68+nI2/0=; b=yoOokkL98k6U/eLPcQ2IKPrMa+JCLDHFx7VTj8Av/EF7sAqS6C9Fq/vt54oJOkL06L rgTD3lFnNq3en288W3d2voVI6rCPRz6p3IuSbPq64nbwZsUf0mANWc+jQX0GzLkfmkpV AfN8g2S6uVz2bRGc5jQmOFppIP4VDVJpMGpPWhEajTSYqCViV311PKnxHy1Tg6gTperw cwTAc8PpfEtZeZvXIum5V0tcZPO4INATS66h2LRaVnNvbFJnVd7ATm+XVQqrE8D9vXyX 9T+4mZKXjgf7Y5wKp69IBrtvw/Le3rqmWy8zlufcmezwCVEGhCK1of5eMwu7mYToAqP6 BcQA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.254.200 with SMTP id ak8mr62557896ved.12.1386231521657; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 00:18:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.155.147 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 00:18:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52A0198C.6060306@freebsd.org> References: <529C0827.4020003@freebsd.org> <52A0198C.6060306@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 00:18:41 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is ixgbe usable with SR-IOV? From: Jack Vogel To: Colin Percival Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: Jack F Vogel , "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 08:18:43 -0000 Unfortunately its a feature that was implemented, and worked, but it has not had a lot of use I suspect, and it has been in a limited number of setups. I know nothing about this Amazon provided hosting, is it linux/kvm or xen? I can see if we can get something set up and check it here. Jack On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Colin Percival wrote: > Hi Jack, > > On 12/04/13 10:21, Jack Vogel wrote: > > Yes, the ixv code was specifically written to work in a guest with > SRIOV, however > > our internal testing did not use DHCP, what if you assign it an address, > will it > > work then? > > Hard-coding an IP address doesn't work either. Or rather, I can assign it > an > address, but it continues to not pass packets. > > Are there any diagnostic tunables/sysctls I should try turning on? Since > this > is in EC2 I'm unfortunately limited to "printf-style" debugging. > > -- > Colin Percival > Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve > Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid > From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 5 08:32:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C9338BE for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:32:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from o3.shared.sendgrid.net (o3.shared.sendgrid.net [208.117.48.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44CD117E6 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:32:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.info; h=from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpapi; bh=mjVrv8wBh1CqGDRfkCCgYt1VKNw=; b=V3VO0ShDbM9nsnGw05 blFmkXVB7mxmfgpSDlRySacTIjwna29oApPsz1299yMwZ/M3l6CV+pMhdn4RMrQr 0gpKvNxQNQx6oY8loI8/gKRYJuEDhP55O1B/byKYjVckzWMnSUTBXHdVPYMJXB/Q 9WoXk5UtaL6XNhHpp87g/R8GM= Received: by mf19 with SMTP id mf19.30614.52A03A3A1 Thu, 05 Dec 2013 08:32:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.tarsnap.com (unknown [10.60.208.15]) by mi58 (SG) with ESMTP id 142c1e3728c.2009.6da75 for ; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 02:32:57 -0600 (CST) Received: (qmail 50957 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2013 08:32:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by ec2-107-20-205-189.compute-1.amazonaws.com with ESMTP; 5 Dec 2013 08:32:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 14739 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2013 08:30:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO clamshell.daemonology.net) (127.0.0.1) by clamshell.daemonology.net with SMTP; 5 Dec 2013 08:30:24 -0000 Message-ID: <52A039A0.9000906@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 00:30:24 -0800 From: Colin Percival User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jack Vogel Subject: Re: Is ixgbe usable with SR-IOV? References: <529C0827.4020003@freebsd.org> <52A0198C.6060306@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SG-EID: RUbAm5H8PjswBj/QH+sYVehaJogg3iBnZcyVi1bw/IxqtifQuFIClAI8UbgTLS9Q5bFC91fMhScSHVyftEQQWtg8eZF8fLviMClGs8z1yhfTdQokyrSSeD6AsYfu2TMyNYJOpOdPkqX0FhGjuhW5upMs4LRgcp22rV9jdS1UT8g= Cc: Jack F Vogel , "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 08:32:59 -0000 On 12/05/13 00:18, Jack Vogel wrote: > Unfortunately its a feature that was implemented, and worked, but it > has not had a lot of use I suspect, and it has been in a limited number > of setups. I know nothing about this Amazon provided hosting, is it > linux/kvm or xen? > > I can see if we can get something set up and check it here. This is Xen, running in this case using HVM: http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/ -- Colin Percival Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 5 08:43:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5469AC59; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:43:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-x22f.google.com (mail-vc0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF3351891; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:43:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id ld13so12447953vcb.6 for ; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 00:43:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=XNMeeOOugJbDGGYu7f6Q/LgBBx5IzZIi27W/zksNkNA=; b=Za+8+xkdLgBLq/BS8x9Vtzf8SKgoAaes9kz8W+93yKOzodHTOrfL00jDAvktTTCySP ouX5bo9UajNhDS+py1PWSt4GNYMNWJtsocmfbtQmZnEaKsBdhV/l8HcRIPnpm2N1ZQUW 8YUAK1MmREiPtD7TYWzw30XD9zWT50YRF8hcwcqKxrLA8UGi9aZolEgkAGDYrF0QIX53 3tjRFW54cyc6HMaI1wDHNAa3YWOVLCnelHFYNgTbsWGOrQf9leDkxIAJTXUGBqi/GJyi g/R8GiewR9gy9lcjhuYAPDW7J4r3HWydPi8/kW+MTk2+54XKMH2A0ccU/J1ZxR9SUB4r AVkg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.3.144 with SMTP id 16mr1573269vcn.33.1386232993989; Thu, 05 Dec 2013 00:43:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.155.147 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 00:43:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52A039A0.9000906@freebsd.org> References: <529C0827.4020003@freebsd.org> <52A0198C.6060306@freebsd.org> <52A039A0.9000906@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 00:43:13 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is ixgbe usable with SR-IOV? From: Jack Vogel To: Colin Percival Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: Jack F Vogel , "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 08:43:15 -0000 OK, very different kettle of fish from anything that's been tested :) Let me talk about it with some people tomorrow and see what we can do. Jack On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:30 AM, Colin Percival wrote: > On 12/05/13 00:18, Jack Vogel wrote: > > Unfortunately its a feature that was implemented, and worked, but it > > has not had a lot of use I suspect, and it has been in a limited number > > of setups. I know nothing about this Amazon provided hosting, is it > > linux/kvm or xen? > > > > I can see if we can get something set up and check it here. > > This is Xen, running in this case using HVM: http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/ > > -- > Colin Percival > Security Officer Emeritus, FreeBSD | The power to serve > Founder, Tarsnap | www.tarsnap.com | Online backups for the truly paranoid > > From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 6 17:14:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B361AC03 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 17:14:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu (boomhauer.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA411FCA for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 17:14:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boomhauer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.egr.msu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 339E142D40; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:14:08 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at egr.msu.edu Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by boomhauer (boomhauer.egr.msu.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wCVkYN3yiMMl; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:14:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from daemon.localdomain (daemon.egr.msu.edu [35.9.44.65]) by mail.egr.msu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E83142D3B; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:14:07 -0500 (EST) Received: by daemon.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 21281) id BBD543C0A1; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:14:07 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:14:07 -0500 From: Adam McDougall To: Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= Subject: FreeBSD 10-BETA4 r258899 PVHVM Xen clock -> 1970 on VM migration Message-ID: <20131206171407.GD5386@egr.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 17:14:16 -0000 Hello, I noticed on recent (PVHVM) builds of FreeBSD 10 that I randomly lose the proper date/time when I migrate my VM from one XenServer to another in the pool. I was intending to reproduce a much smaller time difference I've seen on 9 but this was a much bigger jump so I started concentrating on the big jumps. When I migrate my VM back and forth between two servers, it will randomly jump to a date in 1970 or 1969. Continued migrations often bring the proper date/time back, but there is not a strong pattern. The 1970 comes and goes. I could not reproduce this kind of jump on 9. This happens on XenServer 6.0 and 6.2. I will take a stab at trying PVH time permitting, but since 10.0 will ship with PVHVM it seems appropriate to try to fix it if possible. Let me know if there is more testing or information gathering I should do. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 6 17:36:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B508333 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 17:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SMTP.CITRIX.COM (smtp.citrix.com [66.165.176.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2C771157 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 17:36:26 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,842,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="81422827" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 06 Dec 2013 17:36:19 +0000 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:36:18 -0500 Message-ID: <52A20B11.7010101@citrix.com> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 18:36:17 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam McDougall Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10-BETA4 r258899 PVHVM Xen clock -> 1970 on VM migration References: <20131206171407.GD5386@egr.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20131206171407.GD5386@egr.msu.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 17:36:28 -0000 On 06/12/13 18:14, Adam McDougall wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed on recent (PVHVM) builds of FreeBSD 10 that I randomly lose the > proper date/time when I migrate my VM from one XenServer to another in the > pool. I was intending to reproduce a much smaller time difference I've seen > on 9 but this was a much bigger jump so I started concentrating on the big > jumps. When I migrate my VM back and forth between two servers, it will > randomly jump to a date in 1970 or 1969. Continued migrations often bring > the proper date/time back, but there is not a strong pattern. The 1970 > comes and goes. I could not reproduce this kind of jump on 9. This happens > on XenServer 6.0 and 6.2. Hello, Thanks for testing, there were some bugs in Xen regarding the migration of PVHVM guests, the one that comes to mind, and that could cause this kind of time disruption is: http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-06/msg01110.html The patch should be present in at least Xen 4.3, not sure about previous versions. Is there anyway you could try this on a recent Xen version (4.3)? > I will take a stab at trying PVH time permitting, > but since 10.0 will ship with PVHVM it seems appropriate to try to fix it > if possible. Let me know if there is more testing or information gathering > I should do. Thanks. Xen 4.4 will be the first version to support PVH, which has not yet been released, and right now doesn't support migration. If you could try a recent version of Xen that contains the mentioned patch it will certainly help diagnose it (or at least make sure it's caused by this issue). Roger. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 6 18:15:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D812221E for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 18:15:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu (dauterive.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.168]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A2C1451 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 18:15:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dauterive (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.egr.msu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43603CFD7; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 13:09:39 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at egr.msu.edu Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by dauterive (dauterive.egr.msu.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pTqBG8ZQzGla; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 13:09:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from daemon.localdomain (daemon.egr.msu.edu [35.9.44.65]) by mail.egr.msu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934F83CFD0; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 13:09:39 -0500 (EST) Received: by daemon.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 21281) id 4DCE33CF46; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 13:09:39 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 13:09:39 -0500 From: Adam McDougall To: Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10-BETA4 r258899 PVHVM Xen clock -> 1970 on VM migration Message-ID: <20131206180939.GE5386@egr.msu.edu> References: <20131206171407.GD5386@egr.msu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131206171407.GD5386@egr.msu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 18:15:39 -0000 On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 12:14:07PM -0500, Adam McDougall wrote: Hello, I noticed on recent (PVHVM) builds of FreeBSD 10 that I randomly lose the proper date/time when I migrate my VM from one XenServer to another in the pool. I was intending to reproduce a much smaller time difference I've seen on 9 but this was a much bigger jump so I started concentrating on the big jumps. When I migrate my VM back and forth between two servers, it will randomly jump to a date in 1970 or 1969. Continued migrations often bring the proper date/time back, but there is not a strong pattern. The 1970 comes and goes. I could not reproduce this kind of jump on 9. This happens on XenServer 6.0 and 6.2. I will take a stab at trying PVH time permitting, but since 10.0 will ship with PVHVM it seems appropriate to try to fix it if possible. Let me know if there is more testing or information gathering I should do. Thanks. The same happens with PVH it seems: FreeBSD pvhvm 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 2740cfb(master) Maybe as the VM is resuming after migration it can sync clock with the Dom0? Some of my servers run daemons that are sensitive to abrupt time changes (dovecot) which will purposely stop running if the time is altered by more than 60 seconds. Even on 9 I've seen the time jump by a few minutes or more after a migration. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 6 23:12:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52D9B2E9 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 23:12:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu (boomhauer.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22AA11A97 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 23:12:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boomhauer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.egr.msu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88426425C2; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 18:12:22 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at egr.msu.edu Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by boomhauer (boomhauer.egr.msu.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TSND9sfg1uRf; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 18:12:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from daemon.localdomain (daemon.egr.msu.edu [35.9.44.65]) by mail.egr.msu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62551425BD; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 18:12:22 -0500 (EST) Received: by daemon.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 21281) id 472813C0A9; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 18:12:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 18:12:22 -0500 From: Adam McDougall To: Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10-BETA4 r258899 PVHVM Xen clock -> 1970 on VM migration Message-ID: <20131206231222.GM5386@egr.msu.edu> References: <20131206171407.GD5386@egr.msu.edu> <52A20B11.7010101@citrix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <52A20B11.7010101@citrix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 23:12:24 -0000 On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 06:36:17PM +0100, Roger Pau Monné wrote: On 06/12/13 18:14, Adam McDougall wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed on recent (PVHVM) builds of FreeBSD 10 that I randomly lose the > proper date/time when I migrate my VM from one XenServer to another in the > pool. I was intending to reproduce a much smaller time difference I've seen > on 9 but this was a much bigger jump so I started concentrating on the big > jumps. When I migrate my VM back and forth between two servers, it will > randomly jump to a date in 1970 or 1969. Continued migrations often bring > the proper date/time back, but there is not a strong pattern. The 1970 > comes and goes. I could not reproduce this kind of jump on 9. This happens > on XenServer 6.0 and 6.2. Hello, Thanks for testing, there were some bugs in Xen regarding the migration of PVHVM guests, the one that comes to mind, and that could cause this kind of time disruption is: http://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-06/msg01110.html The patch should be present in at least Xen 4.3, not sure about previous versions. Is there anyway you could try this on a recent Xen version (4.3)? It seems fine in 4.3, I installed the 2013-12-05 ISO on http://www.xenserver.org/overview-xenserver-open-source-virtualization/download/2-uncategorised/115-development-snapshots.html which identifies itself as 6.2.50. I migrated a VM about 8 times. It did become off by a couple seconds but ntpd should fix that up. > I will take a stab at trying PVH time permitting, > but since 10.0 will ship with PVHVM it seems appropriate to try to fix it > if possible. Let me know if there is more testing or information gathering > I should do. Thanks. Xen 4.4 will be the first version to support PVH, which has not yet been released, and right now doesn't support migration. If you could try a recent version of Xen that contains the mentioned patch it will certainly help diagnose it (or at least make sure it's caused by this issue). Roger. Sorry, I missed the part in your original email about needing Dom0 changes for PVH. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 7 11:01:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49EE5753; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 11:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SMTP.CITRIX.COM (smtp.citrix.com [66.165.176.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C05414A7; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 11:01:57 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,846,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="81999975" Received: from accessns.citrite.net (HELO FTLPEX01CL01.citrite.net) ([10.9.154.239]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2013 11:01:55 +0000 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (10.80.16.47) by smtprelay.citrix.com (10.13.107.78) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.4; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 06:01:54 -0500 Message-ID: <52A30023.2030303@citrix.com> Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 12:01:55 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" Subject: [HEADS UP] FreeBSD guest integrated into Xen push gate tests X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-DLP: MIA1 Cc: "Justin T. Gibbs" , Ian Jackson X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 11:01:59 -0000 Hello, Today we had the first successful run of the Xen push gate tester (OSSTest) containing a FreeBSD PVHVM guest. This means that from now onwards every commit on the Xen repository will be tested against a FreeBSD PVHVM guest (i386 and amd64), to make sure new changes in Xen doesn't break current support in FreeBSD. You can see the results of the first run at: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22323/ The jobs are test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 and test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386, you can see what's being tested on the results matrix. This guests are created using the official FreeBSD VM images, found at: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/VM-IMAGES/10.0-BETA3/ Right now it's using the BETA3 images, but I plan to update that once 10.0 is released. A very big thanks goes to Ian Jackson for integrating my crappy FreeBSD install script into OSSTest and for solving the various problems that arose during the integration. Roger. From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 7 17:50:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5D5996E for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:50:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu (hill.egr.msu.edu [35.9.37.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2371EB7 for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 17:50:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hill (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.egr.msu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F326A24C15 for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 12:45:00 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at egr.msu.edu Received: from mail.egr.msu.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by hill (hill.egr.msu.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id knxdC_zaRMlu for ; Sat, 7 Dec 2013 12:45:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from EGR authenticated sender Message-ID: <52A35E9C.6070409@egr.msu.edu> Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 12:45:00 -0500 From: Adam McDougall User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP] FreeBSD guest integrated into Xen push gate tests References: <52A30023.2030303@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <52A30023.2030303@citrix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 17:50:38 -0000 On 12/07/2013 06:01, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > Hello, > > Today we had the first successful run of the Xen push gate tester > (OSSTest) containing a FreeBSD PVHVM guest. This means that from now > onwards every commit on the Xen repository will be tested against a > FreeBSD PVHVM guest (i386 and amd64), to make sure new changes in Xen > doesn't break current support in FreeBSD. You can see the results of the > first run at: > > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22323/ > > The jobs are test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 and > test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386, you can see what's being tested on the > results matrix. This guests are created using the official FreeBSD VM > images, found at: > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/VM-IMAGES/10.0-BETA3/ > > Right now it's using the BETA3 images, but I plan to update that once > 10.0 is released. > > A very big thanks goes to Ian Jackson for integrating my crappy FreeBSD > install script into OSSTest and for solving the various problems that > arose during the integration. > > Roger. > Thanks for the work everyone put in!