From owner-freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 11:07:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0701A792 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:07:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E84A82C5B for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA4B70EO048619 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:07:00 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rA4B70kd048617 for freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:07:00 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:07:00 GMT Message-Id: <201311041107.rA4B70kd048617@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:07:01 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o ports/182561 xfce x11-wm/xfce4 fails to start from xdm o ports/180048 xfce x11-wm/xfce4: make port xfce fail on GLIB, which doesn o ports/177616 xfce x11/xfce4-terminal doesn't always spawn new tab when < o ports/174768 xfce x11-wm/xfce4-panel starts in properies edit state o ports/173393 xfce x11-wm/xfce4 window manager broken o ports/169079 xfce print/xfce4-print does not build on i386 o ports/168708 xfce x11-fm/thunar-vfs: wrong dependencies? o ports/165685 xfce x11-wm/xfce4 - excessive replication of menu items o ports/155431 xfce x11-wm/xfce4: The little bugs 9 problems total. From owner-freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 14:31:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09FF8D00; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 14:31:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivierd@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D384C28F9; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 14:31:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA4EVhdw098944; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 14:31:43 GMT (envelope-from olivierd@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from olivierd@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rA4EVhxk098943; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 14:31:43 GMT (envelope-from olivierd) Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 14:31:43 GMT Message-Id: <201311041431.rA4EVhxk098943@freefall.freebsd.org> To: jwbacon@tds.net, olivierd@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.org From: olivierd@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/169079: print/xfce4-print does not build on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 14:31:44 -0000 Synopsis: print/xfce4-print does not build on i386 State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: olivierd State-Changed-When: Mon Nov 4 14:31:43 UTC 2013 State-Changed-Why: print/xfce4-print builds fine on i386 (tested on 8.4-RELEASE, 9.2-RELEASE and 10-CURRENT) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=169079 From owner-freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 18:29:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5937881 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 18:29:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rosti.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x236.google.com (mail-wg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46DB32905 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 18:29:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id c11so2511469wgh.9 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 10:29:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ezpowaKJhwXGQF8+JCrbx8Dwza1gghK00MA2e+Iv2+c=; b=tg7+hE0J8jrfKvegVFNKeJi53N5ZkE3ZkGuZO5Ij40RzEFhj35C8SFg5gk+UtT7BLx l8WYy4cZNygsCi/60w48vGrCqYeTKyLKmi0DWGXls9ZU2M1wh/u/rQfcofuJCbxuyBEW QEfjWBJGahszi8W6a3wfd2fZUbgzKp9HKy4jcZIXJ1dO9BPXZbI8ou0hK05zaZJFdov5 i/Ydj/6hQ2yY4vSKLQ0eor78eTw84s28P/sVYE4/tkOGsYgHTgORZUS1yZ6BylnLO3Yj 4XMKPhPFEB8P4F/XNtbH6CCvQYL2Rgw6fvQqQhu8ge25XM8v/mevrwbL95V7Ie3DMeIF 2owg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.12.14 with SMTP id u14mr13382028wib.63.1383589741131; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 10:29:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.216.2 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 10:29:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 20:29:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Some icons in the Application Menu are missed From: Rostislav Krasny To: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 18:29:03 -0000 I've FreeBSD 10.0-BETA2 with xfce-4.10_5 binary packages installed. Icons of following three items in the Application Menu are missed: 1. Run Program... 2. Setting | Keyboard 3. Multimedia | Audio Mixer Instead of the right icons there is an icon with red X. Also, when I run any of those application the icon in the left top corner of the window is also looks like a default icon of an application without any custom icon. Where those icons are usually located? Within the executable files themselves? There are a few icons in /usr/local/share/pixmaps/ directory. But most of the icons are not there. Then where are they taken from? From owner-freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 19:28:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C108253 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:28:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rosti.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x22f.google.com (mail-we0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F230E2CD2 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:28:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id t61so2509915wes.20 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:28:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=wj/mziyoYZI1XN5JkyXq3upHkdvqSCtFJBBSkYxQV8w=; b=plaY5PPvota42nx1t1X1GjY6T5VNPgE7c98RhhCR2kae2gR7XMoB1DFU6BGug3id3G rZCKrOh25UtjqtBii2uMofiM0vQ9NQ1yFj5908sQmDR5AtOJHaOalKUvVLUTuxZFsWra 7fuLlvUYk+5SWIpl/ONQOdaVfs5YNjs8F73ECVPZwGWkHPVOHVx5e8v8P4wUys/X/9uM zMd+rmINMbVICm5nW/4TKfcekVQStRN3I+3F0n6rQ2N/vnWaqDKLcVisnnOxneJU7B4L 7V2uMALdD6fZPsfzq/01RTDZn7UTi0HZnruNDqYK2OZstcfKKM2yrrWkgNRen8HTtT1S SmMw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.94.38 with SMTP id cz6mr13726993wib.27.1383593329245; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:28:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.216.2 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:28:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 21:28:49 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: vendorinfo file From: Rostislav Krasny To: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 19:28:51 -0000 Hi, I've noticed that 'xfce4-about' looks for the /usr/local/share/xfce4/vendorinfo file. If it's missed a warning message is printed in console: xfce4-about-Message: No vendor information found in "/usr/local/share/xfce4/vendorinfo". If this file exists then there is an additional tab (FreeBSD tab) in the xfce4-about window and content of the vendorinfo file is printed there. Is it a known feature? It seems to be added in the upstream 3 years ago by following commit: http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce4-commits/2010-November/013752.html I think some "about" and/or other FreeBSD advertising information could be put into that file. What do you think? From owner-freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 19:49:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xfce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D831FA10 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:49:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duchateau.olivier@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x22a.google.com (mail-lb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64DBE2E06 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id u14so5900876lbd.29 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:49:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=7JeWoPuPDMH13laVcdD2NVKE3TSdSm75dFBofUQTaT8=; b=Tn++4lBkc5U1FjSORJ/mq9ocUqVtDLNvE8KRHkBYGS1X9UUDC//LtX8XSqzb5qKQos 7kO4/VyeAz7d0xuCkaOxxQHbXuaq05AznuKw27iKFNcV3MvYKJ39039afkAUOICWHi0H IziurNZKwd6Ts+L/ZGhOg0wTi97KMgBBsEtJdaeZPwBzlv95BQwOKcTz0LIZq6o0dcyG PGF7AHkcX1Ku0mL055YLbA0I1IccaxE3UdiJOO0zSmunwEY+Be/TzvjSlmbY39nQSnNa wTS8hUJnzIndOnPQUaM2Xpdqt87RtNsnB6cfsUJM6K1+7LcBQ1pNtAk4nQqk0NhN+dLx jNsg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.168.105 with SMTP id zv9mr15639lbb.48.1383594569386; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:49:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.9.8 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:49:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 20:49:29 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: Some icons in the Application Menu are missed From: Olivier Duchateau To: "xfce@FreeBSD.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 19:49:31 -0000 Missing xfce@ list ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Olivier Duchateau Date: 2013/11/4 Subject: Re: Some icons in the Application Menu are missed To: Rostislav Krasny 2013/11/4 Rostislav Krasny : > I've FreeBSD 10.0-BETA2 with xfce-4.10_5 binary packages installed. > Icons of following three items in the Application Menu are missed: > > 1. Run Program... > 2. Setting | Keyboard > 3. Multimedia | Audio Mixer > > Instead of the right icons there is an icon with red X. Also, when I > run any of those application the icon in the left top corner of the > window is also looks like a default icon of an application without any > custom icon. Icon with red X, is default icon when real right icon is missing. > > Where those icons are usually located? Within the executable files > themselves? There are a few icons in /usr/local/share/pixmaps/ > directory. But most of the icons are not there. Then where are they > taken from? Check if icons-tango and icons-tango-extras are installed. It's default icons theme for the Xfce desktop. You should also install gnome-icon-theme (contains especially keyboard and mixer icons). Icons theme are located in /usr/local/share/icons and / or ~/.icons (not available for everyone). Generally /usr/local/share/pixmaps directory contains image for desktop files, not for icons theme. You can select your preferred icons theme (Tango, GNOME, or another) with settings manager. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xfce > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xfce-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- olivier -- olivier From owner-freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 19:59:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE120D0 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:59:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duchateau.olivier@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com (mail-la0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C8D72EBA for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 19:59:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id ec20so436141lab.2 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:59:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=bij1cpXCLjnW//HMlzWQ2gtB1e+r5z8LZUtpAMyANAo=; b=HLr+j/7MAYCmXxdRuZ+A7zHLqBfzjx35OS52gROOJ4ItU/9iF46rYUWMYTwsT4pjkD 9AINDLwrY+izx9DCOX2zCnz6jTEdomiPQiiUBi+U86TknLWKqXCNXbnrq5hHJSJOzOgS RSmrdsgiAVVK3sjUwYultVsusSpY0lzHLXqMFTRSsy099nAC5utJzfYLgcD9eV+aaA9u ZLi+14nZddNE3FW1hKETlw/WG1VXnFhuPIf2TbsAmuiObsZtCtUBLUF5BzoZ6IfJ9OZC ITO+XlyerRu9djQTuRJJVDoeE4wwPFjD++9abuGKbuniLX4HJz9b6LJUt6/x9KnoUUKn Nvwg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.234.168 with SMTP id uf8mr2819419lbc.35.1383595156491; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 11:59:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.9.8 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 11:59:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 20:59:16 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: vendorinfo file From: Olivier Duchateau To: Rostislav Krasny Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 19:59:19 -0000 2013/11/4 Rostislav Krasny : > Hi, > > I've noticed that 'xfce4-about' looks for the > /usr/local/share/xfce4/vendorinfo file. If it's missed a warning > message is printed in console: > > xfce4-about-Message: No vendor information found in > "/usr/local/share/xfce4/vendorinfo". It's odd x11/libxfce4menu is precisely compilled with option --with-vendor-info=FreeBSD It's an workaround, if we can't provide vendor info file. I know some Linux distros do same thing. I've never had this message in my log session. > > If this file exists then there is an additional tab (FreeBSD tab) in > the xfce4-about window and content of the vendorinfo file is printed > there. > > Is it a known feature? It seems to be added in the upstream 3 years > ago by following commit: > > http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce4-commits/2010-November/013752.html > > I think some "about" and/or other FreeBSD advertising information > could be put into that file. What do you think? Why not, but which file ? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xfce > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xfce-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- olivier From owner-freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 20:57:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E72ED72 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 20:57:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rosti.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1CF52247 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 20:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hm4so1163151wib.12 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 12:57:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rd5m0QksfKXxFtucdKRn5LbKYt9iTOqI319iSByY1WA=; b=03DTwT4JZg/xLvx735N7JpJkJ2hkDS8EGBJMt0M+sxX0+ARewq9MDIyV8gkWcsFC98 GZXGt7l5E5qk091r/pmlX/5eMfM4EIwDe99XVu87FADsYbnxPBiXSZ3hBk4yEliMPS3Z YKE+imqNG5OWQIqT3h72/SAUQFloBoKYhXJfh9vfDJkLq7JrpXxonbgxFv/rUJCHn6KY I8+rFJjbqs3TO3IjXhK9Pl5eMF466RdaIDo4TkxO+/ScuM+hOCx3l1nVZ6vy+15PGcvI Z+W3iau60rPB6yEp2mX6hoI/iZQS2QBXNrSGHmRbBaqYTidgcmN0uMCiZPIkm10v7rg5 cFvQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.94.38 with SMTP id cz6mr14005778wib.27.1383598630044; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 12:57:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.216.2 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 12:57:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 22:57:09 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: vendorinfo file From: Rostislav Krasny To: Olivier Duchateau Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 20:57:12 -0000 On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Olivier Duchateau wrote: > 2013/11/4 Rostislav Krasny : >> Hi, >> >> I've noticed that 'xfce4-about' looks for the >> /usr/local/share/xfce4/vendorinfo file. If it's missed a warning >> message is printed in console: >> >> xfce4-about-Message: No vendor information found in >> "/usr/local/share/xfce4/vendorinfo". > > It's odd x11/libxfce4menu is precisely compilled with option > > --with-vendor-info=FreeBSD > > It's an workaround, if we can't provide vendor info file. I know some > Linux distros do same thing. I'm not familiar with autoconfig scripts, but is this workaround still necessary? According to following code chunk taken from http://git.xfce.org/archive/xfce-utils/tree/configure.in.in eliminating the --with-vendor-info script argument will make VENDOR_INFO undefined AC_ARG_WITH([vendor-info], AC_HELP_STRING([--with-vendor-info=NAME], [Specify an additional vendor name, optionally with a file in prefix/share/xfce4/NAME]), [with_vendor_info="$withval"], [with_vendor_info=""]) if test x"$with_vendor_info" != x""; then AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED([VENDOR_INFO], ["$with_vendor_info"], [Additional vendor name and/or info]) AC_MSG_RESULT([$vendorinfo]) else AC_MSG_RESULT([not set]) fi Then xfce4-about (in its main.c) will not look for any vendorinfo file and will show only xfce version without any vendor name. http://git.xfce.org/archive/xfce-utils/tree/xfce4-about/main.c > I've never had this message in my log session. I see it in the console from wich I run startxfce4 >> If this file exists then there is an additional tab (FreeBSD tab) in >> the xfce4-about window and content of the vendorinfo file is printed >> there. >> >> Is it a known feature? It seems to be added in the upstream 3 years >> ago by following commit: >> >> http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce4-commits/2010-November/013752.html >> >> I think some "about" and/or other FreeBSD advertising information >> could be put into that file. What do you think? > > Why not, but which file ? The /usr/local/share/xfce4/vendorinfo file. Or did you ask what to write there? From owner-freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 21:01:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9693F00 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 21:01:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rosti.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67ABA22B6 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 21:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id ez12so1183745wid.17 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 13:01:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=7O8cLZUjg13rFZC/u7q12zy/pjcA4yRUKvEQx0ga9oM=; b=csAS8bNR9RZWHh7sAIRlI1Jgb2pkjZPkaupj8gfIWhel8pDgq/jxxdMZON0nYPZVLc PfP0uewReFX+rYRCL7lpgbBQsRzzg78ZVEo2eCLbappHP4QMjYSjGQ/Qh8ojJjvYZAVl 7EhYCZxcg6sMEqiay6goAOi74bqc69YJZHL+uVkCT+uFVkc8DB6UsumKAM5Qsl3VvDzY oNoPlLAudmiYF45a4pt5oRx29iiT5dtHRm2WxOlI2/ka0Kw4vAvOoKvJMvRH2iTv71ns +SqUqnZMfOLkAuwGSnPqgAPSkwbGBMAoP8ybZ4rsw6Vaw5BwWxggeWzFkXtcBFN5k5jE iVPA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.211.48 with SMTP id mz16mr13988067wic.63.1383598867785; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 13:01:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.216.2 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 13:01:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 23:01:07 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: Some icons in the Application Menu are missed From: Rostislav Krasny To: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 21:01:09 -0000 The freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org address had been somehow dropped/forgotten. Forwarding this to the mailing list. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Rostislav Krasny Date: Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:16 PM Subject: Re: Some icons in the Application Menu are missed To: Olivier Duchateau On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Olivier Duchateau wrote: > 2013/11/4 Rostislav Krasny : >> I've FreeBSD 10.0-BETA2 with xfce-4.10_5 binary packages installed. >> Icons of following three items in the Application Menu are missed: >> >> 1. Run Program... >> 2. Setting | Keyboard >> 3. Multimedia | Audio Mixer >> >> Instead of the right icons there is an icon with red X. Also, when I >> run any of those application the icon in the left top corner of the >> window is also looks like a default icon of an application without any >> custom icon. > > Icon with red X, is default icon when real right icon is missing. Yes, that's what I thought it is. >> Where those icons are usually located? Within the executable files >> themselves? There are a few icons in /usr/local/share/pixmaps/ >> directory. But most of the icons are not there. Then where are they >> taken from? > > Check if icons-tango and icons-tango-extras are installed. It's > default icons theme for the Xfce desktop. They are installed: rosti@saturn:~ % pkg info | grep icons-tango icons-tango-0.8.90_2 Basic set of icons for the most common usage icons-tango-extras-0.1.0_5 A extra set of icons from the Tango project > You should also install gnome-icon-theme (contains especially keyboard > and mixer icons). Aren't those icons part of the following xfce4 packages? xfce4-mixer-4.10.0_4 ==> (mixer) xfce4-settings-4.10.1 ==> (keyboard) Or is it a dependecy bug? What about "Run Program..." menu item (the Application Finder)? Isn't it a standard and mandatory part of xfce4? BTW a big icon of the Application Finder in a panel exists. What about icons in the left top corner of the window? Are they the same icons as used in the application menu? > Icons theme are located in /usr/local/share/icons and / or ~/.icons > (not available for everyone). I have Tango and hicolor directories in the /usr/local/share/icons one. > > Generally /usr/local/share/pixmaps directory contains image for > desktop files, not for icons theme. Ok > You can select your preferred icons theme (Tango, GNOME, or another) > with settings manager. Could it be a bug in the Tango theme and some icons are just missed in it or in its FreeBSD package? In Settings | Appearence | Icons I have only Tango. From owner-freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 22:22:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2390CFB0 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 22:22:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duchateau.olivier@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com (mail-la0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A31FF27C1 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 22:22:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id ec20so562819lab.2 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 14:22:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Z9gvvVHM2WDzibRx3edmV7H8r9XUVIoN9L50XACZQDA=; b=SewcSHmu/m23pX05ZWx1E/Zozm5oRiv8VwSKQzsE+gP5lW5/zjWZ5tiZTbg+jUbAhb Lj4sODmnqmUuYd2fpuiFJiwbVPVHxeQ2YTy0Muk+cRWSOFhctz/+So/2zcw9HCLR/Ijt MPBMkw+BT/6fqAYnF9rviEQgBMghPwmAwGnn9LPRe6ctXU15rk1ecOxZid0ha41eP9Em SXSRfZvmQ151JsZugfiSGWsAWW2R+5Sv3DqHuwuXKwFFb6qlpgkNZcTzdnEFSQsYay65 fI9RYwc5aDWig8nrdsYsa0+gKYggDVaZfKFTR+5gWAvqCm9S4TyKkKSEKuk3vCqhn1pr kdRQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.170.133 with SMTP id am5mr13742577lac.9.1383603750736; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 14:22:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.9.8 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 14:22:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 23:22:30 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: vendorinfo file From: Olivier Duchateau To: Rostislav Krasny Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 22:22:33 -0000 2013/11/4 Rostislav Krasny : > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Olivier Duchateau > wrote: >> 2013/11/4 Rostislav Krasny : >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've noticed that 'xfce4-about' looks for the >>> /usr/local/share/xfce4/vendorinfo file. If it's missed a warning >>> message is printed in console: >>> >>> xfce4-about-Message: No vendor information found in >>> "/usr/local/share/xfce4/vendorinfo". >> >> It's odd x11/libxfce4menu is precisely compilled with option >> >> --with-vendor-info=FreeBSD >> >> It's an workaround, if we can't provide vendor info file. I know some >> Linux distros do same thing. > > I'm not familiar with autoconfig scripts, but is this workaround still > necessary? > According to following code chunk taken from > http://git.xfce.org/archive/xfce-utils/tree/configure.in.in It's wrong file, xfce-utils is deprecated (located in archive folder). xfce4-about code now belongs to libxfce4ui (libxfce4menu in your ports tree). > eliminating the --with-vendor-info script argument will make > VENDOR_INFO undefined > > AC_ARG_WITH([vendor-info], > AC_HELP_STRING([--with-vendor-info=NAME], [Specify an additional > vendor name, optionally with a file in prefix/share/xfce4/NAME]), > [with_vendor_info="$withval"], [with_vendor_info=""]) > if test x"$with_vendor_info" != x""; then > AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED([VENDOR_INFO], ["$with_vendor_info"], > [Additional vendor name and/or info]) > AC_MSG_RESULT([$vendorinfo]) > else > AC_MSG_RESULT([not set]) > fi > > Then xfce4-about (in its main.c) will not look for any vendorinfo file > and will show only xfce version without any vendor name. > http://git.xfce.org/archive/xfce-utils/tree/xfce4-about/main.c > >> I've never had this message in my log session. > > I see it in the console from wich I run startxfce4 To avoid this message create an empty file like this: touch /usr/local/share/xfce4/vendorinfo See commit log, here http://git.xfce.org/xfce/libxfce4ui/commit/xfce4-about/main.c?id=4a14ef81cdc6f3e45b63eb42ca41c6af50c9c0c4 > >>> If this file exists then there is an additional tab (FreeBSD tab) in >>> the xfce4-about window and content of the vendorinfo file is printed >>> there. >>> >>> Is it a known feature? It seems to be added in the upstream 3 years >>> ago by following commit: >>> >>> http://mail.xfce.org/pipermail/xfce4-commits/2010-November/013752.html >>> >>> I think some "about" and/or other FreeBSD advertising information >>> could be put into that file. What do you think? >> >> Why not, but which file ? > > The /usr/local/share/xfce4/vendorinfo file. Or did you ask what to write there? -- olivier From owner-freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 22:43:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13CA2342 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 22:43:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duchateau.olivier@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x232.google.com (mail-lb0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9545C28B5 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 22:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f178.google.com with SMTP id l4so3683247lbv.23 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 14:43:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4fvGOKV2fuGxA+t44+UGrBSpu3KPEsgzgxsla9BqUjE=; b=k97n0I0cNRPSm53yWiGXQHbMTv8TdNZajuCtMYMMzmbvZpu/AxmNyTH5TXg9czsba7 ekdKGhaPU2usj2KXAd2b4ATvLjtz84EKVjTI5NxYO2MDJGQ+erMfSHVQw059DEZufXMm 58e6qNOLaRjpc1MvbOOcW2hfY54EJHViB0sKWIpMPsl0f8nxZrJ1wY7VU0WgIObyv0+u JQqxLmZJkCIuRFOy9StxowyFjCs/n8Xmx8B3tG4LlaFWbe3iZviJ94ivEWxvl9tjOlrR 1zwb7a3P+j4oJWC9P4ZQsnRt9PqD6w7I1U6keUCfF7olfGXNDYSmMg2gXRf3hSbP6KX8 AGZA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.3.42 with SMTP id 10mr13848284laz.22.1383605007001; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 14:43:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.9.8 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 14:43:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 23:43:26 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Some icons in the Application Menu are missed From: Olivier Duchateau To: Rostislav Krasny Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 22:43:31 -0000 2013/11/4 Rostislav Krasny : > The freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org address had been somehow > dropped/forgotten. Forwarding this to the mailing list. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Rostislav Krasny > Date: Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 10:16 PM > Subject: Re: Some icons in the Application Menu are missed > To: Olivier Duchateau > > > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Olivier Duchateau > wrote: >> 2013/11/4 Rostislav Krasny : >>> I've FreeBSD 10.0-BETA2 with xfce-4.10_5 binary packages installed. >>> Icons of following three items in the Application Menu are missed: >>> >>> 1. Run Program... >>> 2. Setting | Keyboard >>> 3. Multimedia | Audio Mixer >>> >>> Instead of the right icons there is an icon with red X. Also, when I >>> run any of those application the icon in the left top corner of the >>> window is also looks like a default icon of an application without any >>> custom icon. >> >> Icon with red X, is default icon when real right icon is missing. > > Yes, that's what I thought it is. > >>> Where those icons are usually located? Within the executable files >>> themselves? There are a few icons in /usr/local/share/pixmaps/ >>> directory. But most of the icons are not there. Then where are they >>> taken from? >> >> Check if icons-tango and icons-tango-extras are installed. It's >> default icons theme for the Xfce desktop. > > They are installed: > > rosti@saturn:~ % pkg info | grep icons-tango > icons-tango-0.8.90_2 Basic set of icons for the most common usage > icons-tango-extras-0.1.0_5 A extra set of icons from the Tango project > >> You should also install gnome-icon-theme (contains especially keyboard >> and mixer icons). > > Aren't those icons part of the following xfce4 packages? > > xfce4-mixer-4.10.0_4 ==> (mixer) > xfce4-settings-4.10.1 ==> (keyboard) With Tango some icons are missing, that's why if you install gnome-icon-theme package everything will be ok. It's not bug, generic icons (keyboard, mixer, etc) are often used in Gtk applications, and they change over time. Now style is symbolic icons. To know what is your icons theme, in console try: xfconf-query -c xsettings -p /Net/IconThemeName To change: xfconf-query -c xsettings -p /Net/IconThemeName -s "GNOME" (or Tango, or another one) > > Or is it a dependecy bug? > > What about "Run Program..." menu item (the Application Finder)? Isn't > it a standard and mandatory part of xfce4? Run Program, it's xfce4-appfinder (part of Xfce "core"), you can also run this program with Alt+F2 > > BTW a big icon of the Application Finder in a panel exists. > > What about icons in the left top corner of the window? Are they the > same icons as used in the application menu? Sometimes, depends of applications, but usually they appear on panel. > >> Icons theme are located in /usr/local/share/icons and / or ~/.icons >> (not available for everyone). > > I have Tango and hicolor directories in the /usr/local/share/icons one. > >> >> Generally /usr/local/share/pixmaps directory contains image for >> desktop files, not for icons theme. > > Ok > >> You can select your preferred icons theme (Tango, GNOME, or another) >> with settings manager. > > Could it be a bug in the Tango theme and some icons are just missed in > it or in its FreeBSD package? In Settings | Appearence | Icons I have > only Tango. xfce4 (or xfce4-desktop) installs only Tango icons theme. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xfce > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xfce-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- olivier From owner-freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 22:45:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326F34F9 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 22:45:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rosti.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C402D28D3 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 22:45:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id n12so2353372wgh.5 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 14:45:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=8dKAqeQRn+bf2QjwQQ9aEPqJdI61bXE7JYr1Fq5wFLE=; b=YxTgIspGiBmzhMJhwlYunLibHpQpn/uzaHdwa6OpSvGcdbCOJi+FQbWy4yCNG68APg P+1U5XsPo5EP4CRvVm1agAPaKoeafc/Rh/jRG6KcqeCSx7vYMZElVLmCsKRQErqH50sn OimmU+Q/Et26CRYHILOMPNUK6E8P95grirD+Z0/hWA5q8uBoZMzTzI04dv+aI1uP/Hen b0Kyay4cVrJx21HV9/RwmmZi2J/ax7N6VSMyil92pL2K9xwaTfjNx7KScJuAcNXaoNXm /Rm29Xkq/PVfR0G7lEukfN8P87aQmgVDawu/lGIKn7up5kYot8Exbpk+GptJ8TBc8JRR fbeg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.37.162 with SMTP id z2mr13938844wij.58.1383605157149; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 14:45:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.216.2 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 14:45:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 00:45:57 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: vendorinfo file From: Rostislav Krasny To: Olivier Duchateau Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 22:45:59 -0000 On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Olivier Duchateau wrote: > 2013/11/4 Rostislav Krasny : >> I'm not familiar with autoconfig scripts, but is this workaround still >> necessary? >> According to following code chunk taken from >> http://git.xfce.org/archive/xfce-utils/tree/configure.in.in > > It's wrong file, xfce-utils is deprecated (located in archive folder). > > xfce4-about code now belongs to libxfce4ui (libxfce4menu in your ports tree). libxfce4ui/tree/configure.ac.in has the same code with the same logic. Take a look on this: http://git.xfce.org/xfce/libxfce4ui/tree/configure.ac.in >>> I've never had this message in my log session. >> >> I see it in the console from wich I run startxfce4 > > To avoid this message create an empty file like this: > touch /usr/local/share/xfce4/vendorinfo It will make an empty and unneeded tab named FreeBSD. If you want to keep the vendor information, it's better to write something about FreeBSD in that file (i.e. in that tab). > See commit log, here > http://git.xfce.org/xfce/libxfce4ui/commit/xfce4-about/main.c?id=4a14ef81cdc6f3e45b63eb42ca41c6af50c9c0c4 See the full version of this file. If the VENDOR_INFO macro isn't defined, all that vendor specified code is disabled. http://git.xfce.org/xfce/libxfce4ui/tree/xfce4-about/main.c And according to libxfce4ui/tree/configure.ac.in the VENDOR_INFO seems to be defined only when '--with-vendor-info' is used with some not empty value. From owner-freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 4 23:03:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711D7BAD for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 23:03:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rosti.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EA5D29EC for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 23:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id c11so2783331wgh.14 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:03:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=a14lkIRSEv2Jn8Crrp6goxYTbPBLQsh7ZrFD5pzOzck=; b=JqKVIn4NShWaExERD9EjNvVFz3VpF2DDT0zsC3AuyL1+NWWvrtJDqUWtnrGTUt6Ijg fswv6xTWbzw3Qlf2o7CNts0y2KXuH888kAIRZCE48OiumgHIvYcY9LjJ0soOgaNAoA7t kdiepfOcqpTv5alp9OJT8s4JDM6Ys8Rrn0I0zCLutji+XxEgJJ5tK5TCSAw3d3y6ww7c T/WgT6vwJ2/hfrQmGdV5R6bUz409i0Vt7hneD9hZuSGsESuKimUZoPK+1QmPmi83lPep mQj5UrCCgK0gtjHwfPXAVgUA+mvikwtKOUvd4+GMYFJr7WeTViw1so1VtB3w7PYG8YS5 nNYA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.208.45 with SMTP id mb13mr14179934wic.27.1383606197304; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 15:03:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.216.2 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 15:03:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 01:03:17 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Some icons in the Application Menu are missed From: Rostislav Krasny To: Olivier Duchateau Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2013 23:03:19 -0000 So the Tango theme is incomplete (or not all-sufficient) and there is a few icons, shared between all GTK applications? Those shared icons are part of the GNOME theme? Do I understand you right? If I do, then why the GNOME theme isn't a mandatory dependency of the xfce4 and or of the xfce4-desktop? One way or the other the user experience is poor. I, as a user, expect to get a complete and ready xfce environment with all necessary icons of all installed parts of it. From owner-freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 00:39:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6752865D for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 00:39:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rosti.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3A712F06 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 00:39:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f53.google.com with SMTP id eh20so3778873lab.12 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 16:39:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=LuSqKvRQoRItTGYfANjdzZIiDXUZW0bd/fVoP9TcuZQ=; b=sDQR1oqawaLTmCNC7smA/xzMoccZDlg59B7aNIi3eFKAJO7gNaoBVu/zKbphQhI/E5 rKOK+vpuQJ5+V5sZ8UdzadQaIQb+tG3ASFkly3j4obFVbf+vInkzNWVmhEwmbM0AJL2p q8UQfcTHF2+TvyVLlP3d728OEBDSnkfH+H7SAlgU1t85Dy8Xl25NLbeWKBLc+2kwDoZM WTO0YA4WjBZ5BJbmubpvBICdgoJwlSAJGHxQI9VFRyJJ+Q2SPstwPzf2L5LJtl/5INnB UxMz0z66wQzZ80oQtwXEEUsP1yl2p7X/ypEOVfkwITFxYZtYxVZyYd6CZQhjZB6VHnMm ldIQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.168.170 with SMTP id zx10mr13126588lbb.0.1383611982759; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 16:39:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.95.167 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 16:39:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 02:39:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: vendorinfo file From: Rostislav Krasny To: Olivier Duchateau Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=001a11c23c88bd5b3904ea634452 Cc: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 00:39:45 -0000 --001a11c23c88bd5b3904ea634452 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Rostislav Krasny wrote: > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Olivier Duchateau >> See commit log, here >> http://git.xfce.org/xfce/libxfce4ui/commit/xfce4-about/main.c?id=4a14ef81cdc6f3e45b63eb42ca41c6af50c9c0c4 > > See the full version of this file. If the VENDOR_INFO macro isn't > defined, all that vendor specified code is disabled. > > http://git.xfce.org/xfce/libxfce4ui/tree/xfce4-about/main.c > > And according to libxfce4ui/tree/configure.ac.in the VENDOR_INFO seems > to be defined only when '--with-vendor-info' is used with some not > empty value. Finally I tested it by changes attached in the libxfce4menu.diff file. After this change the xfce4-about program shows no vendor information (neither vendor name in the version text nor vendor tab) and doesn't print any warning in the console it is ran from. I don't insist in this change. If you want to keep '--with-vendor-info=FreeBSD' and to add some vendorinfo file with FreeBSD about and advertising information, it would be nice too. Just make a choice. --001a11c23c88bd5b3904ea634452 Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=US-ASCII; name="libxfce4menu.diff" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="libxfce4menu.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Attachment-Id: f_hnmekvex0 LS0tIE1ha2VmaWxlLm9yaWcJMjAxMy0xMC0yNiAyMzozNzo1Mi4wMDAwMDAwMDAgKzAzMDAKKysr IE1ha2VmaWxlCTIwMTMtMTEtMDUgMDI6MjA6NTcuMDAwMDAwMDAwICswMjAwCkBAIC0zLDcgKzMs NyBAQAogCiBQT1JUTkFNRT0JbGlieGZjZTRtZW51CiBQT1JUVkVSU0lPTj0JNC4xMC4wCi1QT1JU UkVWSVNJT049CTQKK1BPUlRSRVZJU0lPTj0JNQogQ0FURUdPUklFUz0JeDExIHhmY2UKIE1BU1RF Ul9TSVRFUz0JJHtNQVNURVJfU0lURV9YRkNFfQogRElTVE5BTUU9CWxpYnhmY2U0dWktJHtQT1JU VkVSU0lPTn0KQEAgLTIwLDggKzIwLDYgQEAKIElOU1RBTExTX0lDT05TPQl5ZXMKIFVTRVM9CQlw YXRoZml4IHBrZ2NvbmZpZyBnbWFrZQogCi1DT05GSUdVUkVfQVJHUz0JLS13aXRoLXZlbmRvci1p bmZvPUZyZWVCU0QKLQogT1BUSU9OU19ERUZJTkU9CQlET0NTIE5MUyBOT1RJRlkgR0xBREUKIE9Q VElPTlNfREVGQVVMVD0JTk9USUZZCiAK --001a11c23c88bd5b3904ea634452-- From owner-freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 06:10:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A41260F for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 06:10:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duchateau.olivier@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x235.google.com (mail-lb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9E432DFC for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 06:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x18so6109243lbi.40 for ; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 22:10:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NcU/DqZ2L8a4QvK0EOT6QIBeZmcglGWCHZBkngepwW8=; b=ZAMtVvfkLWX3OPRYk1qVXpObNgV+0w0fBVcpLs0vCttlwvF8Psu4KMPfSSeGOBK0cI j2ju+HNkcoxThxLjVUYPbetslt5La+vxOaH3v0o1XNofHCArqIWmSORRp1OM0eL4Tsk6 2i2449RRK6kWbKelx+DKBwJJitzM9+CVMeL7ke4chh4ruejIbiuHSBKbRvheIk0Be3Ua eKoTdiQ/4aIkN9SxPiEKTwaQNJJ3TVsttfzdYIKkBMDbeDHGRw7LVjVmxJFQUDHvY8RU iIEJGRzeb4Z7zzyxfadWl1ZwEtUGQZZ6LXAH1DknddwkWCBw9v8caATjyujMN6VkVcS4 ccOA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.235.40 with SMTP id uj8mr328422lac.39.1383631836828; Mon, 04 Nov 2013 22:10:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.9.8 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Nov 2013 22:10:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 07:10:36 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: vendorinfo file From: Olivier Duchateau To: Rostislav Krasny Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 06:10:39 -0000 2013/11/5 Rostislav Krasny : > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Rostislav Krasny wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Olivier Duchateau >>> See commit log, here >>> http://git.xfce.org/xfce/libxfce4ui/commit/xfce4-about/main.c?id=4a14ef81cdc6f3e45b63eb42ca41c6af50c9c0c4 >> >> See the full version of this file. If the VENDOR_INFO macro isn't >> defined, all that vendor specified code is disabled. >> >> http://git.xfce.org/xfce/libxfce4ui/tree/xfce4-about/main.c >> >> And according to libxfce4ui/tree/configure.ac.in the VENDOR_INFO seems >> to be defined only when '--with-vendor-info' is used with some not >> empty value. > > Finally I tested it by changes attached in the libxfce4menu.diff file. > After this change the xfce4-about program shows no vendor information > (neither vendor name in the version text nor vendor tab) and doesn't > print any warning in the console it is ran from. > > I don't insist in this change. If you want to keep > '--with-vendor-info=FreeBSD' and to add some vendorinfo file with > FreeBSD about and advertising information, it would be nice too. Just > make a choice. I disagree with you, new tab will be created if length of file is greater than zero. If file doesn't exists or is empty nothing append (see xfce_about_vendor() function). --with-vendor-info=FreeBSD is used in main() function (from line 482) as xfce_about_vendor() doesn't initialize new tab, OS is only display. -- olivier From owner-freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 5 08:50:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4977AFCB for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 08:50:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rosti.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com (mail-we0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D91872679 for ; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 08:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id q59so3222727wes.9 for ; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 00:50:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=KOQxwSu41tDIWaFA9mpz1N+fYB+IRQOp7Ou4An+VpZE=; b=CvjjLjTtoxnfXpylG5AqqsUojZPZzcvSm/RhoaIo+91L3CQbPbNAYW6cBIPx/+uQAc ZFKkM0uQrVStR571HSgpDlZYuRl/p0jhlbh06Hhk6PZYN5Lt9eeFeaejdXTACG9y4HEy IPjJwGEYUplWy5Hx9wUqb3p8Ne05SkTXIED3NlJ7KV72GUf8zU6/o5kSrEEbZxdeiz9K rVH9/1b65QcIQ80Y4lFEW5IVSJ1FN4Rr320FiQv0uzAKJ1uViFDWIol942pC3F2ep2dB ekJE/118kZkjVCBOwP+C+sPsdy8l2QVIg3BXDAjRrHZl8+W2q/yFoay5T6LiEdrow9Xo kgxQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.11.38 with SMTP id n6mr16962545wjb.25.1383641439922; Tue, 05 Nov 2013 00:50:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.216.2 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Nov 2013 00:50:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 10:50:39 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: vendorinfo file From: Rostislav Krasny To: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 08:50:42 -0000 Oh Google, why "Reply to all" isn't the default? Forwarding to the mailing list ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Rostislav Krasny Date: Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 10:48 AM Subject: Re: vendorinfo file To: Olivier Duchateau On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Olivier Duchateau wrote: > 2013/11/5 Rostislav Krasny : >> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Rostislav Krasny wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Olivier Duchateau >>>> See commit log, here >>>> http://git.xfce.org/xfce/libxfce4ui/commit/xfce4-about/main.c?id=4a14ef81cdc6f3e45b63eb42ca41c6af50c9c0c4 >>> >>> See the full version of this file. If the VENDOR_INFO macro isn't >>> defined, all that vendor specified code is disabled. >>> >>> http://git.xfce.org/xfce/libxfce4ui/tree/xfce4-about/main.c >>> >>> And according to libxfce4ui/tree/configure.ac.in the VENDOR_INFO seems >>> to be defined only when '--with-vendor-info' is used with some not >>> empty value. >> >> Finally I tested it by changes attached in the libxfce4menu.diff file. >> After this change the xfce4-about program shows no vendor information >> (neither vendor name in the version text nor vendor tab) and doesn't >> print any warning in the console it is ran from. >> >> I don't insist in this change. If you want to keep >> '--with-vendor-info=FreeBSD' and to add some vendorinfo file with >> FreeBSD about and advertising information, it would be nice too. Just >> make a choice. > > I disagree with you, new tab will be created if length of file is > greater than zero. If file doesn't exists or is empty nothing append > (see xfce_about_vendor() function). > > --with-vendor-info=FreeBSD is used in main() function (from line 482) > as xfce_about_vendor() doesn't initialize new tab, OS is only display. Yes you're right. I probably tested it with a file containing only a newline. Anyway the '--with-vendor-info=FreeBSD' seems to be unnecessary. You explained it as a workaround and my patch shows that no such workaround is needed. If you don't want the vendor tab with some appropriate text to appear in the xfce4-about, it's better to disable it completely than making an empty file that nobody really needs. From owner-freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 6 04:19:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596E74F9; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 04:19:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F4912F50; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 04:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA64JIbx034661; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 04:19:18 GMT (envelope-from edwin@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from edwin@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rA64JIKE034660; Wed, 6 Nov 2013 04:19:18 GMT (envelope-from edwin) Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 04:19:18 GMT Message-Id: <201311060419.rA64JIKE034660@freefall.freebsd.org> To: edwin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.org From: edwin@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/183690: x11-wm/xfce4: XFCE4 Tango icon theme is incomplete or not all-sufficient X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 04:19:18 -0000 Synopsis: x11-wm/xfce4: XFCE4 Tango icon theme is incomplete or not all-sufficient Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-xfce Responsible-Changed-By: edwin Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Nov 6 04:19:17 UTC 2013 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=183690 From owner-freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 7 08:28:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: xfce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26AD6CE for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 08:28:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org (portsmon.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3CB8248D for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 08:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.104]) by portsmon.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA78Sn9E025723 for ; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 08:28:49 GMT (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 08:28:49 GMT Message-Id: <201311070828.rA78Sn9E025723@portsmon.freebsd.org> From: linimon@FreeBSD.org To: xfce@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently scheduled for deletion X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: portmgr-feedback@FreeBSD.org List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 08:28:50 -0000 Dear FreeBSD port maintainer: As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on the existing port. In some cases, ports are marked for removal because they fail to build and install correctly from their sources, or otherwise fail in operation. The ports, and the reason and date that they have been scheduled for removal, are listed below. If no one has stepped forward before that time to propose a way to fix the problems (such as via a PR), the ports will be deleted. portname: multimedia/xfce4-media description: Lightweight media player for Xfce4 based on the xine engine maintainer: xfce@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: Upstream development dead, use multimedia/xfce4-parole instead expiration date: 2014-01-04 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=multimedia&portname=xfce4-media portname: net-im/xfce4-messenger-plugin description: Messenger plugin for Xfce maintainer: xfce@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: Deprecated and no update for 7 years expiration date: 2014-01-04 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=net-im&portname=xfce4-messenger-plugin portname: x11-themes/lila-xfwm4 description: Xfce 4 Lila window decoration theme for Xfwm4 maintainer: xfce@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: Upstream development dead expiration date: 2013-12-04 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=x11-themes&portname=lila-xfwm4 If this problem is one that you are already aware of, please accept our apologies and ignore this message. On the other hand, if you no longer wish to maintain this port (or ports), please reply with a message stating that, and accept our thanks for your efforts in the past. Thanks for your efforts to help improve FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 9 18:20:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xfce@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1527622 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 18:20:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEAF52C03 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 18:20:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rA9IK44i075106 for ; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 18:20:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rA9IK4pE075105; Sat, 9 Nov 2013 18:20:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 18:20:04 GMT Message-Id: <201311091820.rA9IK4pE075105@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-xfce@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Olivier Duchateau Subject: Re: ports/183690: x11-wm/xfce4: XFCE4 Tango icon theme is incomplete or not all-sufficient X-BeenThere: freebsd-xfce@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Olivier Duchateau List-Id: XFCE for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 18:20:05 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/183690; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Olivier Duchateau To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, rosti.bsd@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: ports/183690: x11-wm/xfce4: XFCE4 Tango icon theme is incomplete or not all-sufficient Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 19:17:23 +0000 This issue won't be fixed by upstream, because they leave choice to users. Tango icons theme was chosen by us, because Rodent (default icons theme) was abandonned since 4.4 release. At the time, Tango was sufficient. Currently I'm working on next stable of Parole (Xfce's multimedia player) and main developers use symbolic icons. I asked to replace some icons from other, because Tango and GNOME don't have. So GNOME in future will not necessarily be right choice. -- olivier