From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Jul 5 00:37:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A145DA1C3 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 00:37:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 877EB1B47 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 00:37:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t650beg5068098 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 00:37:40 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 128030] [ipsec] Enable IPSec in GENERIC kernel configuration Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 00:37:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: conf X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: feature, needs-patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gnn@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable9? mfc-stable10? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution flagtypes.name bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 00:37:40 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=128030 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|FIXED |--- Flags| |mfc-stable9?, mfc-stable10? Status|Closed |Open --- Comment #13 from Kubilay Kocak --- Thank you George! Are merges to stable/10 and stable/9 possible? Please MFC if so. If not, please set mfc-* flag values to - with a comment so that users know why not, thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Jul 5 00:50:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C903A41B for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 00:50:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23CE212BB for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 00:50:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t650ouo3085824 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 00:50:56 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199174] em tx and rx hang Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 00:50:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: koobs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable9? mfc-stable10? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc flagtypes.name assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 00:50:56 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199174 Kubilay Kocak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|sbruno@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Flags| |mfc-stable9?, mfc-stable10? Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org |sbruno@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #24 from Kubilay Kocak --- Assign to Sean so the issue doesn't remain unassigned with no clear owner Sean, can you clarify in what branches the fix has been committed, as I can't see an automated commit reference message (with PR: 199174 line). >From my reading of the comments, HEAD and stable/10 have the change so far. Can it also be MFC'd to stable/9? I've set MFC flags, please set them to + (after MFC'ing) or - as necessary, with comments -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Jul 5 20:17:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715C4A78E for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 20:17:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CC301026 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 20:17:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t65KHeJ0079613 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 20:17:40 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197535] [re] [panic] if_re (Realtek 8168) causes memory write after free and kernel panic Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 20:17:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable10? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 20:17:40 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197535 --- Comment #15 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: marius Date: Sun Jul 5 20:16:39 UTC 2015 New revision: 285177 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/285177 Log: MFC: r281337 Don't enable RX and TX before their initial configuration is done, i. e. after setting up interrupt moderation but before turning interrupts on. This matches what Realtek's r8168 Linux driver does as of version 8.039.00 and fixes problems with certain incarnations of certain MAC revisions like the interface requiring an extra up/down-cycle after boot to start working or DMA configuration not being adhered to. PR: 193743, 197535 Approved by: re (kib) Changes: _U stable/10/ stable/10/sys/dev/re/if_re.c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Jul 5 20:17:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50D8A79A for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 20:17:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B05B81031 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 20:17:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t65KHhLM079660 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 20:17:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197535] [re] [panic] if_re (Realtek 8168) causes memory write after free and kernel panic Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 20:17:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable10? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 20:17:43 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197535 --- Comment #16 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: marius Date: Sun Jul 5 20:16:46 UTC 2015 New revision: 285178 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/285178 Log: MFC: r281337 Don't enable RX and TX before their initial configuration is done, i. e. after setting up interrupt moderation but before turning interrupts on. This matches what Realtek's r8168 Linux driver does as of version 8.039.00 and fixes problems with certain incarnations of certain MAC revisions like the interface requiring an extra up/down-cycle after boot to start working or DMA configuration not being adhered to. PR: 193743, 197535 Changes: _U stable/9/sys/ _U stable/9/sys/dev/ stable/9/sys/dev/re/if_re.c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Jul 5 20:17:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11B8A7A7 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 20:17:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC5FA1099 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 20:17:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t65KHliY079730 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 20:17:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 197535] [re] [panic] if_re (Realtek 8168) causes memory write after free and kernel panic Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 20:17:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable10? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 20:17:48 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197535 --- Comment #17 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: marius Date: Sun Jul 5 20:16:52 UTC 2015 New revision: 285179 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/285179 Log: MFC: r281337 Don't enable RX and TX before their initial configuration is done, i. e. after setting up interrupt moderation but before turning interrupts on. This matches what Realtek's r8168 Linux driver does as of version 8.039.00 and fixes problems with certain incarnations of certain MAC revisions like the interface requiring an extra up/down-cycle after boot to start working or DMA configuration not being adhered to. PR: 193743, 197535 Changes: _U stable/8/sys/ _U stable/8/sys/dev/ _U stable/8/sys/dev/re/ stable/8/sys/dev/re/if_re.c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Jul 5 21:00:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90B698E175 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 21:00:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1F591CF8 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 21:00:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t65L0wEt067601 for ; Sun, 5 Jul 2015 21:00:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201507052100.t65L0wEt067601@kenobi.freebsd.org> From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 21:00:58 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 21:00:58 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- Open | 194515 | Fatal Trap 12 Kernel with vimage Open | 199136 | [if_tap] Added down_on_close sysctl variable to t 2 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jul 6 06:30:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C8F99341D for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 06:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weh@microsoft.com) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bbn0103.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.111.103]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD6551F5A; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 06:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weh@microsoft.com) Received: from BY1PR03MB1434.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.162.127.152) by BY1PR03MB1434.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.162.127.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.201.16; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 05:57:03 +0000 Received: from BY1PR03MB1434.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.127.152]) by BY1PR03MB1434.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.127.152]) with mapi id 15.01.0201.000; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 05:57:03 +0000 From: Wei Hu To: Julian Elischer , Warren Block , "freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org" Subject: RE: Same NIC name to MAC mapping on FreeBSD Thread-Topic: Same NIC name to MAC mapping on FreeBSD Thread-Index: AQHQtAZLiDAz9QSeSiWXpzUhT/R8GJ3JUdBAgACYvICABA3WoA== Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 05:57:02 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5596B179.7020008@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <5596B179.7020008@freebsd.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: freebsd.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; x-originating-ip: [167.220.232.8] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY1PR03MB1434; 5:LAgr3lpnd0LQ7u/JCs1OKPWCuq60iLHz+w/Adj/qZfAKLBlquKI7gvhvNYiiqeU1Hnpfh7atTFxO6pxTpzw0rBUfzwxHp1kSqmfmrkY0orFilt/zNJJmQp8wbG463woscKuYH0kD4uKJrpLST1xLrg==; 24:wxTU4T+CDserYADpndHudu/qDgqFtHtyuUXoUn8n07cBey1P03dkzW01uAsuCwJ2o6T/NNJD/+TRLZalH31WU5utLY5HIj8IvbfrZay7mFw=; 20:nWeQNF49ypqQssdjwCfDekPkGgGod/qlYZrU2EnfHRjai0jo6G8u1wd3RBy3HFWvnw6yD5RsCVdtqJTSVFCTxg== x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BY1PR03MB1434; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401001)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:BY1PR03MB1434; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY1PR03MB1434; x-forefront-prvs: 06290ECA9D x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(51704005)(164054003)(479174004)(377454003)(77156002)(5001770100001)(19580405001)(19580395003)(106116001)(5003600100002)(2501003)(33656002)(74316001)(5002640100001)(87936001)(2656002)(76176999)(54356999)(50986999)(76576001)(189998001)(5001960100002)(92566002)(66066001)(122556002)(40100003)(62966003)(86362001)(2900100001)(46102003)(2950100001)(102836002)(15975445007)(107886002)(77096005); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR03MB1434; H:BY1PR03MB1434.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Jul 2015 05:57:02.9003 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY1PR03MB1434 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 06:30:23 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Julian Elischer [mailto:julian@freebsd.org] > Sent: Saturday, July 4, 2015 12:00 AM > To: Wei Hu; Warren Block; freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: Same NIC name to MAC mapping on FreeBSD >=20 > On 7/3/15 2:57 PM, Wei Hu wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > >> net@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Warren Block > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2015 10:01 PM > >> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org > >> Subject: Re: Same NIC name to MAC mapping on FreeBSD > >> > >> Gary Palmer gpalmer at freebsd.org wrote: > >>> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:42:43AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > >>>> I vaguely remember being able to do this some years ago but I can't > >>>> remember the details. > >>> I believe they do, yes. In fact I seem to remember a discussion on > >>> this in the last year and someone shared either a devd or an rc.d > >>> script to ensure static NIC names, however searching the web > >>> archvies I couldn't find it > >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2014- > >> December/040533.html > >> > >> Be sure to read all the way to the end, some things that appeared to > >> work initially... did not. > >> > > This seems to be a good solution for now. Thanks so much! >=20 > If you work out a general solution, can you report back what you did? > (so others can find it and save time). >=20 The request was from a partner, I will report back once we reach a general= solution=20 On this. Thanks, Wei From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon Jul 6 09:16:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 691FF93607 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 09:16:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com (mail-wg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9C591EEC; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 09:16:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sodynet1@gmail.com) Received: by wguu7 with SMTP id u7so134569509wgu.3; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 02:16:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UXnr4lYSlYPGtfLnRyj+hm10nGj4VJ+izVgIeFJ3PzE=; b=MPDsfVGzznrsmUIWgMaxTnQRGO6idf9cZNUVXx/Z+anWsz2kGWDed00OB1IRgaVRGq YrsHRp7dhtXFvluvw+laDBT+In/EVtPOH5THbDNp9hoEnPOlS8+OfGLGqODZM/DH/nCY /XDlLrHz+//nQP6XC1sd1Ox8c3wN569VaJVX9E1WIi9ffgCwx5383KaEZKB98mWuJkg3 WY5YJLOBV2hXSUZHmd5gXbFEPH4agvnx3k4vXSZrfrJEeAjyHrYxF9c6gU+4Yz79CKNi 8FaGZf1befb+XOIGiVb+1NF8zFiwckH/87GYRm4YhVPxuQhEm6vQG7weVc4Aq7jfV6jx Ok+w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.8.68 with SMTP id p4mr29273164wia.27.1436174175438; Mon, 06 Jul 2015 02:16:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.65.18 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 02:16:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.65.18 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jul 2015 02:16:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5596B179.7020008@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:16:15 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: RE: Same NIC name to MAC mapping on FreeBSD From: Sami Halabi To: Wei Hu Cc: Julian Elischer , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2015 09:16:17 -0000 there was a similar discussion.. thread by the name: "Network Interface name change". sami =D7=91=D7=AA=D7=90=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9A 6 =D7=91=D7=99=D7=95=D7=9C=D7=99 2015 = 09:30,=E2=80=8F "Wei Hu" =D7=9B=D7=AA=D7=91: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Julian Elischer [mailto:julian@freebsd.org] > > Sent: Saturday, July 4, 2015 12:00 AM > > To: Wei Hu; Warren Block; freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org > > Subject: Re: Same NIC name to MAC mapping on FreeBSD > > > > On 7/3/15 2:57 PM, Wei Hu wrote: > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > > >> net@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Warren Block > > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2015 10:01 PM > > >> To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org > > >> Subject: Re: Same NIC name to MAC mapping on FreeBSD > > >> > > >> Gary Palmer gpalmer at freebsd.org wrote: > > >>> On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 11:42:43AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > >>>> I vaguely remember being able to do this some years ago but I can'= t > > >>>> remember the details. > > >>> I believe they do, yes. In fact I seem to remember a discussion on > > >>> this in the last year and someone shared either a devd or an rc.d > > >>> script to ensure static NIC names, however searching the web > > >>> archvies I couldn't find it > > >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2014- > > >> December/040533.html > > >> > > >> Be sure to read all the way to the end, some things that appeared to > > >> work initially... did not. > > >> > > > This seems to be a good solution for now. Thanks so much! > > > > If you work out a general solution, can you report back what you did? > > (so others can find it and save time). > > > > The request was from a partner, I will report back once we reach a > general solution > On this. > > Thanks, > Wei > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jul 7 09:30:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6424BAED4 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 09:30:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from forward8l.mail.yandex.net (forward8l.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1819::8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20D3A1A4F for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 09:30:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bu7cher@yandex.ru) Received: from smtp19.mail.yandex.net (smtp19.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1402::11a]) by forward8l.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 76E281A41408; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:29:57 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp19.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp19.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id ECCA5BE008A; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:29:56 +0300 (MSK) Received: from unknown (unknown [2a02:6b8:0:1495::16a]) by smtp19.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id Aw8ZDnDspg-TtUKHQxj; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:29:55 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1436261396; bh=cXgIAPHaduqdgZPZJeU1pvsqp56NcIqnuYYye+nOFi0=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=XIXhjRK8Qop61WrP9IxiO5g/nueTJ+U5F8Kk5f3tjN8LWLWsaL3jZ9ErsAFZFdl1+ 86Bfr0pKA2EPH6bIVwROyZoQDQNDmbMQmarPi/epQc/TwGgMWG8OrppqJLrE7ibCPV ArDPLhWgwJfWz41l0oqf7mv0sVEPEP/M8MY0/bWo= Authentication-Results: smtp19.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Message-ID: <559B9C11.8030001@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:29:53 +0300 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kpneal@pobox.com, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What does this sa6_recoverscope msg mean? References: <20150707005104.GA79002@neutralgood.org> In-Reply-To: <20150707005104.GA79002@neutralgood.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JeGIkabS9LiARjbNspJjkRCoPlrScOHd1" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 09:30:01 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --JeGIkabS9LiARjbNspJjkRCoPlrScOHd1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07.07.2015 03:51, kpneal@pobox.com wrote: > I did find and run rtsold with flags "-a -F -d -D" and this is what I g= ot > in my syslog: >=20 > Jul 5 21:14:53 gunsight1 rtsold[31647]: probing bce0 > Jul 5 21:16:21 gunsight1 kernel: sa6_recoverscope: assumption failure = (non 0 ID > ): fe80:1::21c:f6ff:fee8:8c00%1 > Jul 5 21:16:21 gunsight1 kernel: sa6_recoverscope: assumption failure = (non 0 ID > ): fe80:1::21c:f6ff:fee8:8c00%1 > Jul 5 21:18:44 gunsight1 last message repeated 4 times > Jul 5 21:20:34 gunsight1 -- MARK -- >=20 > The ndp command shows two other devices on the network which it claims = are > routers. But I still can't get routing.=20 >=20 > Is the above message pointing at my error or at my provider's error? No, this is debug message. It means that sin6_scope_id is already filled in struct sockaddr_in6. You can ignore it or just upgrade your system. --=20 WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov --JeGIkabS9LiARjbNspJjkRCoPlrScOHd1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVm5wSAAoJEAHF6gQQyKF6NlYIALquRAg8AqHuPcjW/O6/Xmq1 mNuqtLqHUuzgId+m4F1Kn9PnWkTHuBMYdFkJfTtOQ0SvW6iRcFVzBFOuJe+H+UL/ PW1L0epWK3YEk3i2bwvEbe6ptqa+OnqCDWQjw4MUCsz42FDMTxwoKcqA+4MMGm3l WEj135bN3QSy6mKgYllpS+dSAjc3bhGq7U6eOVYhtdO+bKx5D4fj8+FOsUBEBeQP /PHsksbxDLsltxlYVFM+xdFr1PTgmfv+9YvmgaYMIQr4rUASc9dDWurU4GFGuHxY VcBtGHs7DnFBJUZinqQm0G4qPaRP1k3pgjM0v/Di60y0AE0CHIsW8jcq1BArifU= =EPZs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JeGIkabS9LiARjbNspJjkRCoPlrScOHd1-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jul 7 10:29:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19D798FC75 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 10:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from csforgeron@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 568B51FC9; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 10:29:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from csforgeron@gmail.com) Received: by qkbp125 with SMTP id p125so136131306qkb.2; Tue, 07 Jul 2015 03:29:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZVr0L7wip0jP28uKD1+SntSMc7JGzEUKpGyBh/S1Hik=; b=Ig3QlaF2kIIPtAJc9Z3v6CCIrC0EdJBJO1+f59TSODkpcIw0AFaX5x9XM38RdXj/wq AXylUKvgmdBftD32nBA8I7ogsvvzHnoiS2qKMLQtv4SkWwRg123F6WfVFs3n/9HdYVOl 3YKdl3+G9gyf0kGotpFVPUBWM6aVjYOivJk1QQepMr9X6MZZXH3rNuDPYLibMTXL2tgx tl0f808JyqVgj5FbpaE+Ugo4agjWPn3d7ulRQbkIYwfQjIsUABTLjEIZQ0aD/VCD9ttj TAddoA0Zjih9bDHTeGekP4Lpvo3VQMopE8rc3gaMZAO+GfgyvAoTqJMfOxlbg6CjJaKA MeBw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.16.99 with SMTP id a96mr2615722qkh.63.1436264995383; Tue, 07 Jul 2015 03:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.76.104 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 03:29:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <374339249.53058039.1433681874571.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> <55744F28.5000402@field.hu> <557AB1BB.60502@field.hu> <557AD10D.5070205@field.hu> <557AD2FA.103@field.hu> <559109C3.7070900@field.hu> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 07:29:55 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.1-REL - network unaccessible after high traffic From: Christopher Forgeron To: Adrian Chadd Cc: Csaba Banhalmi , FreeBSD Net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 10:29:56 -0000 Hello, Sorry for not replying sooner, but I've been gathering more info. I still have the problem across all my heavily loaded machines, and will be posting detailed info later today - My plan was to start a new thread as to not hijack this further. I'll CC you Adrian on the new thread so you can find it easily. Thanks for your help. On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > hi, > > I asked for the output of vmstat -z and vmstat -m in a loop. :) > > > -a > > > On 29 June 2015 at 02:02, Csaba Banhalmi wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > "vmstat 5" output when system freezes: > > procs memory page disks faults cp= u > > r b w avm fre flt re pi po fr sr ad0 ad1 in sy cs > us sy > > id > > 0 0 0 8752M 126M 5663 0 0 0 4042 445 66 0 1219 7148 > 4870 3 > > 2 95 > > 0 0 0 8650M 145M 2167 0 0 0 3501 447 79 0 974 4042 > 3578 1 > > 1 98 > > 0 0 0 8374M 201M 3113 0 0 0 6790 441 5 0 1130 6670 > 3729 3 > > 1 96 > > 0 0 0 8252M 220M 2632 0 0 0 4014 435 4 0 726 11653 > 2401 2 > > 1 97 > > 0 0 0 8188M 224M 1625 0 0 0 2189 434 5 0 713 6714 > 2376 1 > > 1 98 > > 0 0 0 7992M 233M 1504 0 0 0 2254 433 2 0 867 2890 > 2868 1 > > 1 98 > > 4 0 0 8032M 216M 2145 0 0 0 1995 435 18 0 526 3769 > 2048 1 > > 1 98 > > 0 0 0 8180M 195M 1949 0 0 0 1741 435 50 0 593 3441 > 2363 1 > > 1 98 > > 0 0 0 8186M 178M 2859 0 0 0 2525 436 6 0 499 3313 > 1733 2 > > 1 97 > > 1 0 0 8410M 146M 2521 0 0 0 1764 440 11 0 736 67271 > 2121 4 > > 2 94 > > 0 0 0 8182M 205M 2910 0 0 0 6378 927 8 0 495 16043 > 1775 1 > > 1 98 > > 1 1 0 7944M 210M 3009 0 0 0 3696 438 8 0 522 4247 > 1963 2 > > 1 97 > > 0 0 0 8091M 169M 7529 0 0 0 3601 436 105 0 1359 75290 > 4400 9 > > 3 88 > > 0 0 0 8121M 141M 4607 0 0 0 3288 444 62 0 949 12169 > 3268 5 > > 1 94 > > 0 0 0 8044M 201M 1782 0 0 0 4954 1795 9 0 446 3025 > 1927 1 > > 1 99 > > 0 0 0 7916M 222M 1296 0 0 0 2671 438 5 0 525 2984 > 1920 1 > > 1 98 > > 1 0 0 7870M 230M 888 0 0 0 1677 432 8 0 473 6424 > 2126 1 > > 1 99 > > 0 0 0 7968M 228M 3375 0 0 0 2625 433 51 0 768 4100 > 2852 3 > > 1 96 > > 0 0 0 8238M 194M 7586 0 0 0 4758 436 88 0 1026 9631 > 3908 4 > > 2 94 > > 0 0 0 8293M 185M 3253 0 0 0 2362 437 52 0 747 4475 > 3105 2 > > 1 97 > > > > I increased the vm.v_free_min, but did not help. It was a different > froze, > > the system was unreacheable even through IPMI, needed a hard reset. > > > > Regards, > > Csaba > > > > > > > > 2015.06.12. 20:17 keltez=C3=A9ssel, Adrian Chadd =C3=ADrta: > >> > >> On 12 June 2015 at 10:57, Christopher Forgeron > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> I agree it shouldn't run out of memory. Here's what mine does under > >>> network > >>> load, or rsync load: > >>> > >>> 2 0 9 1822M 1834M 0 0 0 0 14 8 0 0 22750 724 > >>> 136119 > >>> 0 23 77 > >>> > >>> 0 0 9 1822M 1823M 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 44317 347 > >>> 138151 > >>> 0 16 84 > >>> > >>> 0 0 9 1822M 1761M 0 0 0 0 17 8 0 0 23818 820 > 92198 > >>> 0 > >>> 12 88 > >>> > >>> 0 0 9 1822M 1727M 0 0 0 0 14 8 0 0 40768 634 > >>> 126688 > >>> 0 17 83 > >>> > >>> 0 0 9 1822M 8192B 0 8 0 0 15 3 3 0 9236 305 > 57149 > >>> 0 > >>> 33 67 > >>> > >>> > >>> That's with a 5 second vmstat output. After the 8KiB, the system is > >>> nearly > >>> completely brain-dead and needs a hard power-off. > >>> > >>> > >>> I've seen it go from 6 GiB free to 8KiB in 5 sec as well. Currently m= y > >>> large > >>> machines are set to 12 GiB free to keep them from crashing, from what= I > >>> presume is just network load due to lots of iSCSI / NFS traffic on my > >>> 10GiB > >>> network. > >>> > >>> > >>> I haven't had time to type this up for the list yet, but I'm putting = it > >>> here > >>> just to make sure people know it's real. > >>> > >> Hi, > >> > >> Then something is leaking or holding onto memory when it shouldn't be= . > >> > >> Try doing vmstat -z and vmstat -m in a one second loop, post the data > >> just before it falls over. > >> > >> > >> -adrian > > > > > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jul 7 12:11:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52F4B995E51 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:11:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from technical@at-hacker.in) Received: from mail.at-hacker.in (mail.at-hacker.in [82.146.54.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E3C31488 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:11:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from technical@at-hacker.in) Received: from [192.168.1.14] (broadband-5-228-79-227.nationalcablenetworks.ru [5.228.79.227]) by mail.at-hacker.in (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E22532AE5BD for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 15:04:34 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=at-hacker.in; s=mail; t=1436270675; bh=W7x1kNulZvpw9l2oGcEGJMP/dxwuhqiHTC3R242WIrg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=eVGALQZnOLwvi3jUPVFGHHH9P0CXlwD+GGIUTATqSDvveISAhxJcARnaOSxeKwSEA D2bauo8DDsw816IVplkwbGk6TxmFSccnEwR+Q1b0aW+mV3GWysKXuntid2jenIJu6q 67N8c8wm8siIRscDF+luewEnnVOkw+JjYV3/44DQ= Message-ID: <559BC04F.70107@at-hacker.in> Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 15:04:31 +0300 From: technical account User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD 9.3: Looks like a bug in pf NAT while translating ICMP packets of type 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:11:47 -0000 Hi. I have an issue with pf in FreeBSD 9.3. Looks there is something wrong with pf's NAT while processing ICMP packets of type 3 (destination unreachable). Here is what I see on LAN interface: 16:46:10.334993 IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 64, id 63254, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 289) 10.12.0.198 > 84.47.xx.yy: ICMP 10.12.0.198 udp port 8293 unreachable, length 269 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 60, id 34284, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 261) 84.47.xx.yy.53 > 10.12.0.198.8293: 37288 2/4/4 www.jdm022.com. CNAME sbsfe-p8.geo.mf0.yahoodns.net., sbsfe-p8.geo.mf0.yahoodns.net. A 98.138.19.143 (233) I.e. some server (84.47.xx.yy) send an UDP packet to client (10.12.0.198, port 8293). This port is closed on client and client send ICMP packet "Port unreachable" to server 84.47.xx.yy. This ICMP packet contains the header of that UDP packet that was sent to closed client's port: 84.47.xx.yy.53 > 10.12.0.198.8293: 37288 2/4/4 www.jdm022.com. CNAME sbsfe-p8.geo.mf0.yahoodns.net., sbsfe-p8.geo.mf0.yahoodns.net. A 98.138.19.143 (233) And this is what I see on external WAN interface: 16:46:10.335012 IP (tos 0xc0, ttl 63, id 63254, offset 0, flags [none], proto ICMP (1), length 289) 10.12.0.198 > 84.47.xx.yy: ICMP 213.208.kkk.zz udp port 61534 unreachable, length 269 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 60, id 34284, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 261) 84.47.xx.yy.53 > 213.208.kkk.zz.61534: 37288 2/4/4 www.jdm022.com. CNAME sbsfe-p8.geo.mf0.yahoodns.net., sbsfe-p8.geo.mf0.yahoodns.net. A 98.138.19.143 (233) As you can see, pf translated UDP header that was included into ICMP packet: "ICMP 213.208.kkk.zz udp port 61534 unreachable". IP 213.208.kkk.zz is IP of my external WAN interface where NAT works. But it did not change ICMP packet itself. So I have outgoing ICMP "port unreachable" packet with source address 10.12.0.198 ON EXTERNAL interface. Also I found that pf can't block this kind of packets. Rule like: block out quick on $wan_if proto icmp from 10.12/16 to any icmp-type 3 code 3 does not work at all. So I have to use IPFW to block those ICMP packets. Here is my NAT rule: nat on $wan_if from to any -> 213.208.kkk.zz Table defines like this: table { 10.12/16, 10.13/16 } Also I found a mention about this issue in OpenBSD pf: http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/system-6564-pf-not-nating-does-not-see-icmp4-port-unreachable-packets-from-machine-behind-pf-td187997.html They said that this bug is fixed in 2011. But in FreeBSD 9.3 it is not fixed so far? My system: FreeBSD vpn2-lesnoy.isp.local 9.3-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p2 #0: Mon Sep 15 16:44:27 UTC 2014 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jul 7 12:33:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101B4995290 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:33:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@vega.codepro.be) Received: from venus.codepro.be (venus.codepro.be [IPv6:2a01:4f8:162:1127::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.codepro.be", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C549D1D46 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:33:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@vega.codepro.be) Received: from vega.codepro.be (unknown [172.16.1.3]) by venus.codepro.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EFD9BE6; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 14:33:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: by vega.codepro.be (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B6BBC7B72; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 14:33:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 14:33:20 +0200 From: Kristof Provost To: technical account Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.3: Looks like a bug in pf NAT while translating ICMP packets of type 3 Message-ID: <20150707123320.GF3135@vega.codepro.be> References: <559BC04F.70107@at-hacker.in> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <559BC04F.70107@at-hacker.in> X-Checked-By-NSA: Probably User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 12:33:24 -0000 On 2015-07-07 15:04:31 (+0300), technical account wrote: > I have an issue with pf in FreeBSD 9.3. Looks there is something wrong > with pf's NAT while processing ICMP packets of type 3 (destination > unreachable). > Can you check if this also happens on CURRENT? If so, please create a bug on bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla and cc me (kp@FreeBSD.org). You've already gathered the information required for a good bug report. I'll try to take a look at it when I find some time. Regards, Kristof From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jul 7 15:53:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C36839963A5 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 15:53:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFD631F3F for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 15:53:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t67FrQOi013411 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 15:53:26 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194690] options IPSEC disables TCP keepalives Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 15:53:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: gjb@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 15:53:26 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194690 Glen Barber changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gnn@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #5 from Glen Barber --- George, you might want to be aware of this PR, since GENERIC now includes IPSEC by default in 11-CURRENT. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue Jul 7 16:29:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C47F996C21 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 16:29:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3866C1118 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 16:29:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t67GTjfA085592 for ; Tue, 7 Jul 2015 16:29:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 196252] [patch] show tcp hostcache usage in netstat -s -p tcp Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 16:29:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: gjb@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2015 16:29:45 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196252 Glen Barber changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Jul 8 00:15:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA194996CA5 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 00:15:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D70461946 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 00:15:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t680Fin4050931 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 00:15:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194690] options IPSEC disables TCP keepalives Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:15:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: gnn@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: gnn@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 00:15:45 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194690 George V. Neville-Neil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org |gnn@FreeBSD.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Jul 8 13:19:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E095D99553D for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 13:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCFB115B2 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 13:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t68DJXbi080082 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 13:19:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 196980] PCI Resource Allocation Causing 2 em devices to fail during initialization Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 13:19:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: gjb@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 13:19:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196980 Glen Barber changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #1 from Glen Barber --- Can you confirm if this is still an issue for you on 10.2-PRERELEASE? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Jul 8 17:37:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1704C996A97 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:37:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02D3C118C for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:37:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t68HbIgq005774 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:37:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 187341] [netinet] [patch] CARP addresses in backup state should't be used as source Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:37:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: unspecified X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: gjb@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:37:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187341 Glen Barber changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|In Progress |Closed Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Glen Barber --- Close PRs that have a corresponding commit to resolve the issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Jul 8 18:32:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A776995A16 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35F1E1E69 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:32:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t68IWDts057884 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:32:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194238] [tcp] Ping attempted with MTU 9000 transmits fragmented packets of size 1500 Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 18:32:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: gjb@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 18:32:13 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194238 --- Comment #5 from Glen Barber --- To originators/assignees of this PR: A commit to the tree references this PR, however the PR is still in a non-closed state. Please review this PR and close as appropriate, or if closing the PR requires a merge to stable/10, please let re@ know as soon as possible. Thank you. Glen -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Jul 8 19:28:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBEB899682B for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 19:28:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A84871696 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 19:28:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t68JS6F0051242 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 19:28:06 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 194264] race between unp_dispose (called from sofree) and unp_gc Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 19:28:06 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: mjg@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mjg@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 19:28:06 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194264 Mateusz Guzik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org |mjg@FreeBSD.org CC| |mjg@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #4 from Mateusz Guzik --- Try the patch at https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2015-July/056481.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu Jul 9 12:36:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2889979FE for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:36:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bpurgar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 714CD11F8 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:36:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bpurgar@gmail.com) Received: by wgxm20 with SMTP id m20so39002176wgx.3 for ; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 05:36:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LBiScZPq/IC9KqaGueN6k6h+njZeJ0/RZOYI5gwJIAE=; b=pZTUg0bkkaX2NF72942q/AouxBLUZdiFnGWHCexxQfz+pOH0n4WDegdC5Ip56fESR0 rAgrtYSfDdJZy/fuZQP1l1ughMkOI68dj13FbLu4rUEgwsFHxUz1YxEKAYMiHY+eQoOF TLlYW1BoLvF9M56q7ihhy7vBsyuM4MMlVVboxZk/ZV1RYtZ5BhciJrR9EpFRyU7V5oOP 5KD7QtYel+Re4Sd5atyIAcQePV7+KYEpST0LXIcWdA2GnFYcf1z227ovaGmrB8jcaCsV kkdaDebaF6YB4lMpFS6nfu4uI5kPTaKjJZTtfZLle6+XTDRt7fjnJoNWoeMBGCUjj7zU uBEw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.174.194 with SMTP id bu2mr32574165wjc.76.1436445407900; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 05:36:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.31.72 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 05:36:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 14:36:47 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: 802.11s & bridging ? From: Berislav Purgar To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 12:36:50 -0000 Hello on HEAD does bridging mesh and lan works ? I have tried this but no luck . i found this back from 2010 and now in 2015 i have same problem. arp request pass from PC1 - lan - TPLINK 3020 (mesh / bridge ath0+re0) - WIFI - TPLINK 3020 (mesh/bridge ath+re0) - lan - to PC2 .. PC2 send arp response but its lost on second bridge. https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2010-November/026969.html From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Jul 10 13:07:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF43575FB for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:07:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Received: from mail.tdx.com (mail.tdx.com [62.13.128.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FF210F4 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:07:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Received: from [10.12.30.106] (vpn01-01.tdx.co.uk [62.13.130.213]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.tdx.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/) with ESMTP id t6AD4hqb033430 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:04:44 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 14:04:44 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: lagg of em0/em1 + VLAN = lower MTU? Message-ID: <7CFE75F7566F5789DAD9FBB2@[10.12.30.106]> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:07:28 -0000 Hi, I've got a 10.1 box with a couple of Intel(R) PRO/1000 (82571EB) cards in it, e.g. " em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=4019b ... " I've set these up as a fail-over lagg interface, lagg0: " lagg0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=4019b ... inet y.y.y.y ... laggproto failover lagghash l2,l3,l4 laggport: em1 flags=0<> laggport: em0 flags=5 " This works fine. If I add a VLAN now to that, I end up with: " lagg0.10: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1496 ... inet x.x.x.x ... vlan: 60 parent interface: lagg0 " The MTU on lagg0.10 has shrunk by 4 (size of VLAN tag). Is there a way of avoiding that? -Karl From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Jul 10 17:24:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DFC3508 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:24:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5E6410A3 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:24:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t6AHOMNj052978 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:24:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199174] em tx and rx hang Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:24:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable9? mfc-stable10? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:24:22 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199174 --- Comment #25 from Sean Bruno --- (In reply to david.keller from comment #23) Ah, is this an NFS test or a raw iperf test? I still need to take care of something that Rick M. asked me to do. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Jul 10 18:06:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC3363C01 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:06:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmg@gold.funkthat.com) Received: from gold.funkthat.com (gate2.funkthat.com [208.87.223.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gold.funkthat.com", Issuer "gold.funkthat.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F832891 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:06:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmg@gold.funkthat.com) Received: from gold.funkthat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gold.funkthat.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6AI6Rki060440 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 11:06:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmg@gold.funkthat.com) Received: (from jmg@localhost) by gold.funkthat.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id t6AI6RJG060439; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 11:06:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jmg) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 11:06:27 -0700 From: John-Mark Gurney To: Karl Pielorz Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lagg of em0/em1 + VLAN = lower MTU? Message-ID: <20150710180627.GA8523@funkthat.com> References: <7CFE75F7566F5789DAD9FBB2@[10.12.30.106]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7CFE75F7566F5789DAD9FBB2@[10.12.30.106]> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE amd64 X-PGP-Fingerprint: 54BA 873B 6515 3F10 9E88 9322 9CB1 8F74 6D3F A396 X-Files: The truth is out there X-URL: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/ X-Resume: http://resnet.uoregon.edu/~gurney_j/resume.html X-TipJar: bitcoin:13Qmb6AeTgQecazTWph4XasEsP7nGRbAPE X-to-the-FBI-CIA-and-NSA: HI! HOW YA DOIN? can i haz chizburger? User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (gold.funkthat.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 10 Jul 2015 11:06:27 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:06:28 -0000 Karl Pielorz wrote this message on Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 14:04 +0100: > This works fine. If I add a VLAN now to that, I end up with: > > " > lagg0.10: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu > 1496 > ... > inet x.x.x.x > ... > vlan: 60 parent interface: lagg0 > " > > > The MTU on lagg0.10 has shrunk by 4 (size of VLAN tag). Is there a way of > avoiding that? Try bumping the MTU on the root em's by 4 (1504) before creating the lagg... -- John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579 "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not." From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Jul 10 18:35:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A35C18E2B for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:35:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FC711C5A for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:35:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t6AIZC7S020209 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:35:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199174] em tx and rx hang Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:35:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: david.keller@litchis.fr X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable9? mfc-stable10? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:35:12 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199174 --- Comment #26 from david.keller@litchis.fr --- (In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #25) So far, it only happened when NFS mount was stressed (torrent traffic). I didn't manage to reproduce using iperf. It doesn't seems to me directly related to bandwidth as it occurs with less than 4MB/s read/write traffic. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Jul 10 18:43:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BB78F68 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:43:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F0EA9A for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:43:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t6AIhJkO030155 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:43:19 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199174] em tx and rx hang Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:43:19 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable9? mfc-stable10? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 18:43:19 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199174 --- Comment #27 from Sean Bruno --- (In reply to david.keller from comment #26) ok, good to know. I have an idea of what to do thanks to Rick. Let me test some things and try to reproduce fail/fix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Jul 10 19:05:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACAC9972A3 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:05:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu.meyer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com (mail-qk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A52F2C56 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:05:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu.meyer@gmail.com) Received: by qkhu186 with SMTP id u186so213324295qkh.0 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:05:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=XWEUJ4wwKS4m9mBxOxwcfJb4tzWafwKruH37FvORMxI=; b=EX5NlatG4t49izkf+LBV+t5QTpK4LVROiey+Hl/bAbEKjhxaYvA3AgpGq3p2Q3mxZ8 pQTb0O9QMGMwL4qR41auuq0wYIb/eme7BoOKVM83ecXboVUG9zR13jKVVw+P756zHf+L keu76ImChuE8i8QZOz0dXLILVjP4UW62TMQ8rPK3aoIxhS+/ScQpFE2uCHjeRbF1XCxZ xs3YKl2dBfdiTZmWs29EYEfYA3JL2SyeYTkbORbLMtcDByCN64hX+Cdtgr5hce9lJho2 M7pAbY+uB9KYs7lQplsVtjZpBD+LMvJjxUYts4fzi4BRYgI4lU3YKuvW/hKoTYKBeBKw ProA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.231.8 with SMTP id b8mr37536137qhc.55.1436555137426; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:05:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.111.232 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:05:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:05:37 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: netmap-ipfw: kipfw two instances sharing same port From: Eduardo Meyer To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:05:39 -0000 Hello, should ./kipfw and another ./kipfw work? I want to have two filtered kipfw instances sharing the same WAN port. So far I did a quick test lab and it worked, but since it's a lab environment I don't know if I should expect other problems when I add it to run in a real scenario. What problems should I expect? Can they be minimized? Basic stateless filtering only. -- =========== Eduardo Meyer pessoal: dudu.meyer@gmail.com profissional: ddm.farmaciap@saude.gov.br From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Jul 10 19:09:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54B1599730E for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:09:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pavel.odintsov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB4B2F27 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:09:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pavel.odintsov@gmail.com) Received: by wiwl6 with SMTP id l6so54477878wiw.0 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:09:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=BbHWaIfXMO1536yEWZyH5dxg7h9bzysNhxAKHQhUCBM=; b=eG9ntIa6EEJprO12pxNfedJVh+Zz0q///4a7+LX0159DdxOJ64y17eD1J96jfwyKyZ /r1Cvspt0tHmE8Qb36RtgtUCNPO2Qd52W1JWLy3Q4tKiFk0jfpD/T3eKM5EZmcQ+Ian+ f3XDwRJo+SSk9v5XETfRjJ+w9gV5MRNE2cRq3mwraBLrJyAUm5x3BlPQUXMVmitpIiNM aq1+9tdBr74hLAFMnrfQF8vdc0/SAkaIKlOPBuTCGLcnxFmz+UUABPCsRpetdAGDWPr6 oiF6GZEy9evgtunQd4DXrVcjLeZWzFg1DX+Z4MfXfVxhsi+AfdTB09njE5YXxAYX1I5N +amA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.100.104 with SMTP id ex8mr46392269wjb.69.1436555382123; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:09:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.138.84 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:09:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:09:42 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: netmap-ipfw: kipfw two instances sharing same port From: Pavel Odintsov To: Eduardo Meyer Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:09:44 -0000 Hello! You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance of kipfw on each pair: kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix1-1 And so on ;) i have about 12 mpps with this configuration (on Linux netmap). On Friday, July 10, 2015, Eduardo Meyer wrote: > Hello, > > should ./kipfw and another ./kipfw work? > > I want to have two filtered kipfw instances sharing the same WAN port. > > So far I did a quick test lab and it worked, but since it's a lab > environment I don't know if I should expect other problems when I add it to > run in a real scenario. > > What problems should I expect? Can they be minimized? > > Basic stateless filtering only. > > -- > =========== > Eduardo Meyer > pessoal: dudu.meyer@gmail.com > profissional: ddm.farmaciap@saude.gov.br > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " > -- Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Jul 10 19:12:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7A61997477 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:12:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pavel.odintsov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C38311CD for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:12:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pavel.odintsov@gmail.com) Received: by wgov12 with SMTP id v12so71978032wgo.1 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:12:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=wK7FSBi7vKS7qyfuiHUCBmoVP4eDgeS/Q2p4rXoE1Bg=; b=o1lbRxW788mp5nkaAn7009f+RET7h73aiHl5tllZNO8Fe1bPMV0BzhL1JsHr4/0o5J XbBqTkn/xkrPq292+LbVDf2rYeyhV2G/M+3sCm9pcs3llo1n80HfVtDPpJmQFK/gKkuf CK/xyw6Xntlgr4NWR9iGH8PzgeBsW39iIJAjPR90nuP4EbufPcBfDAVftXeGowIUZ5SQ WrNGWQ3Ezzc20KicFSIDJ8/60R5mXZBYrXT4JuVhPRh7UwSgUbOcdqDahgDuGHwp7BvH Tpubz84UHN7g9ME5uxsWJ2WmXG2P4VL4a3DbHN7qDXNg42kL75V0t9rtiW+nI2GAD4zX lWJA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.79.162 with SMTP id k2mr678026wix.46.1436555565699; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:12:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.138.84 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:12:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:12:45 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: netmap-ipfw: kipfw two instances sharing same port From: Pavel Odintsov To: Eduardo Meyer Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:12:47 -0000 You should run netmap-ipfw with this command (it will run 8 copies of kipfw): for i in `seq 0 7`; do IPFW_PORT="555$i" taskset -c $i kipfw netmap:eth0-$i netmap:eth1-$i & done When you need add or remove rule you should do it for all 8 copies of kipfw: for i in `seq 0 7`;do IPFW_PORT="555$i" ipfw/ipfw add deny all from any to any On Friday, July 10, 2015, Pavel Odintsov wrote: > Hello! > > You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance of > kipfw on each pair: > kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 > kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix1-1 > > And so on ;) i have about 12 mpps with this configuration (on Linux > netmap). > > On Friday, July 10, 2015, Eduardo Meyer > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> should ./kipfw and another ./kipfw work? >> >> I want to have two filtered kipfw instances sharing the same WAN port. >> >> So far I did a quick test lab and it worked, but since it's a lab >> environment I don't know if I should expect other problems when I add it >> to >> run in a real scenario. >> >> What problems should I expect? Can they be minimized? >> >> Basic stateless filtering only. >> >> -- >> =========== >> Eduardo Meyer >> pessoal: dudu.meyer@gmail.com >> profissional: ddm.farmaciap@saude.gov.br >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > -- > Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov > -- Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Jul 10 19:14:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2179974DB for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:14:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu.meyer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x22b.google.com (mail-qk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16B6714A2 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:14:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu.meyer@gmail.com) Received: by qkcl188 with SMTP id l188so30061219qkc.1 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:14:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=JWXcV4xGATtOH18Bqe7ge/gBH/ewIMPY0AGemsmVqb0=; b=blR4JxTJRQE7r2SHSBBlUPrr2KyFnMK6ITAqprhIinmqnF7k7+F5miTr8uMGuKX38c evwnO8HN4b7jO+ayqqG90FOpckpqMD5vTwQum2iD6yPxP8xIfffO5YyJG0l7mOWKU7fF L3049xiCeZ6PxxYzDSc4vLiLNQcikBTPcdR9xt4rdOzPbH0OGydHNaEdQfhfCj8A3ZpA +voNbuZTr8rFSYoaMTSSZabBMWxvvQlOcgGKvis7YjLR6Cp+LNw/8l72pkv64yfC7NSf WAUPLwMPkD4HgIZyBmvcfDaE4FwcoPdub9qvCmmURplCvw6PQt6TLwBnhID5M4/WU+5U UCcw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.83.84 with SMTP id i78mr35867859qgd.14.1436555673034; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:14:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.111.232 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:14:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:14:32 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: netmap-ipfw: kipfw two instances sharing same port From: Eduardo Meyer To: Pavel Odintsov Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:14:34 -0000 On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov wrote: > Hello! > > You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance of > kipfw on each pair: > kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 > kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix1-1 > > And so on ;) i have about 12 mpps with this configuration (on Linux > netmap). > Wow cool hint and cool numbers. I will get everything properly bridged on both kipfw instances, right? I need to simulate like a 3-port bridge... this would me more like kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix2-0 But I need the same traffic coming on the wire on ix0 to be available on both ix1 and ix2. Will that work like that? I only tried using the default q. > > > On Friday, July 10, 2015, Eduardo Meyer wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> should ./kipfw and another ./kipfw work? >> >> I want to have two filtered kipfw instances sharing the same WAN port. >> >> So far I did a quick test lab and it worked, but since it's a lab >> environment I don't know if I should expect other problems when I add it >> to >> run in a real scenario. >> >> What problems should I expect? Can they be minimized? >> >> Basic stateless filtering only. >> >> -- >> =========== >> Eduardo Meyer >> pessoal: dudu.meyer@gmail.com >> profissional: ddm.farmaciap@saude.gov.br >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > -- > Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov > -- =========== Eduardo Meyer pessoal: dudu.meyer@gmail.com profissional: ddm.farmaciap@saude.gov.br From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Jul 10 19:15:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28207997536 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:15:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rizzo.unipi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x230.google.com (mail-la0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 800FD1585 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:15:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rizzo.unipi@gmail.com) Received: by labgy5 with SMTP id gy5so118649795lab.2 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:15:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=g4t0pMMqBbCDFol/rHdLtYxit+twBQGn2HllYViJQto=; b=WZLTWEnVvMSejrQL8GvULBtDKrA2DARwmW0roGOMHC4NHbEqXhhjpWFbSBuOvyTs8M XJvdUXID2ZQWC2ezJAxKD5W0+FfNR6XjsuKJdEbjHMV4eqtJvDG1a2MN7RFrJtvWb0M2 1zwV7iYYeaCauY6hX/o/0XmAX51uzV3clZZuJD/FqztUWqiFw7CS635YEG+htAkvIgpX MQSenMGXN0fLMAN6xpq/bJm1iCZFQ+ertqpGTZiO9XSQa+4bxCQJZ8ZlOGD/G8yDXzIX 7wdZneBbaAx9/mkpOISsXFUYMiVIcBuQ42Dpio8AXIoe68viaJULpCMIMTG50B7GbSPL axXw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.138.100 with SMTP id qp4mr21207472lbb.62.1436555745022; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:15:45 -0700 (PDT) Sender: rizzo.unipi@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.230.103 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:15:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 21:15:44 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: e7wR7OnaZt6ZPHsaTo_8d4iY_LQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: netmap-ipfw: kipfw two instances sharing same port From: Luigi Rizzo To: Eduardo Meyer Cc: Pavel Odintsov , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:15:48 -0000 On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Meyer wrote= : > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov > wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance o= f > > kipfw on each pair: > > kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 > > kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix1-1 > > > > And so on ;) i have about 12 mpps with this configuration (on Linux > > netmap). > > > > Wow cool hint and cool numbers. > > I will get everything properly bridged on both kipfw instances, right? > > I need to simulate like a 3-port bridge... this would me more like > > kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 > kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix2-0 > > But I need the same traffic coming on the wire on ix0 to be available on > both ix1 and ix2. > =E2=80=8Bit won't replicate traffic on the other two ports, that's a different logic. cheers luigi =E2=80=8B > > Will that work like that? I only tried using the default q. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Friday, July 10, 2015, Eduardo Meyer wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> should ./kipfw and another ./kipfw wor= k? > >> > >> I want to have two filtered kipfw instances sharing the same WAN port. > >> > >> So far I did a quick test lab and it worked, but since it's a lab > >> environment I don't know if I should expect other problems when I add = it > >> to > >> run in a real scenario. > >> > >> What problems should I expect? Can they be minimized? > >> > >> Basic stateless filtering only. > >> > >> -- > >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > >> Eduardo Meyer > >> pessoal: dudu.meyer@gmail.com > >> profissional: ddm.farmaciap@saude.gov.br > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > > > > > -- > > Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov > > > > > > -- > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > Eduardo Meyer > pessoal: dudu.meyer@gmail.com > profissional: ddm.farmaciap@saude.gov.br > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- Prof. Luigi RIZZO, rizzo@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa TEL +39-050-2217533 . via Diotisalvi 2 Mobile +39-338-6809875 . 56122 PISA (Italy) -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Jul 10 19:20:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28E69975E4 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:20:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E95F19B9 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:20:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t6AJKSRT002254 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:20:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199174] em tx and rx hang Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:20:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: david.keller@litchis.fr X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: sbruno@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable9? mfc-stable10? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:20:28 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199174 --- Comment #28 from david.keller@litchis.fr --- (In reply to Sean Bruno from comment #27) I can try to help, could you elaborate on what Rick M. told you ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Jul 10 19:58:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA63997C62 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:58:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu.meyer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C1C511CF for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:58:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu.meyer@gmail.com) Received: by qkdv3 with SMTP id v3so18851905qkd.3 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:58:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=y2gHEMd8qqEyH19HM30Ju7pBxL/QDl3M8dhUQbiyXbw=; b=u8mkC55/AbyN0Cw9Y6D3tXwcjGGho3C35RX4TfU4pGCOSnxMTNPLJeTuffh0XrMi2Y HchTZMsB9vrDYxOjbCg1b4/32wqgcMnN5JH9L88fuF9j524F/PcSrTTO9pUNu5tLYseg 8c0PQB1bvumcW9uaXs4HcKqVoLwO/VbiszwPv+ip6cFlH6sDf/7kleZhweMIdhv5kAfA hzdkePfuOCszxAh4reIFvVzMZtC1Rlb75QVNMIn0Gb1OKZUFm/ihdBq3XXJT+1mYMJNN FQAaxt/Mj4RB8vhrFARP3SB8VU1a2euCwnkoz3LLrG2lPBMBpvaUNwTewlRed8sUrKCm n3wA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.17.133 with SMTP id 5mr10547312qkr.2.1436558331752; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:58:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.111.232 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 12:58:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 16:58:51 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: netmap-ipfw: kipfw two instances sharing same port From: Eduardo Meyer To: Luigi Rizzo Cc: Pavel Odintsov , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 19:58:53 -0000 On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Meyer > wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov > > >> wrote: >> >> > Hello! >> > >> > You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance = of >> > kipfw on each pair: >> > kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 >> > kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix1-1 >> > >> > And so on ;) i have about 12 mpps with this configuration (on Linux >> > netmap). >> > >> >> Wow cool hint and cool numbers. >> >> I will get everything properly bridged on both kipfw instances, right? >> >> I need to simulate like a 3-port bridge... this would me more like >> >> kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 >> kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix2-0 >> >> But I need the same traffic coming on the wire on ix0 to be available on >> both ix1 and ix2. >> > > =E2=80=8Bit won't replicate traffic on the other two ports, > that's a different logic. > > cheers > luigi > yeah it's what I thought, different queues, different packets what about the first approach? should I expect issues? kipfw netmap:ix0 netmap:ix1 kipfw netmap:ix0 netmap:ix2 thank you > =E2=80=8B > > >> >> Will that work like that? I only tried using the default q. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > On Friday, July 10, 2015, Eduardo Meyer wrote: >> > >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> should ./kipfw and another ./kipfw >> work? >> >> >> >> I want to have two filtered kipfw instances sharing the same WAN port= . >> >> >> >> So far I did a quick test lab and it worked, but since it's a lab >> >> environment I don't know if I should expect other problems when I add >> it >> >> to >> >> run in a real scenario. >> >> >> >> What problems should I expect? Can they be minimized? >> >> >> >> Basic stateless filtering only. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> >> Eduardo Meyer >> >> pessoal: dudu.meyer@gmail.com >> >> profissional: ddm.farmaciap@saude.gov.br >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >> Eduardo Meyer >> pessoal: dudu.meyer@gmail.com >> profissional: ddm.farmaciap@saude.gov.br >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > -- > -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- > Prof. Luigi RIZZO, rizzo@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione > http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa > TEL +39-050-2217533 . via Diotisalvi 2 > Mobile +39-338-6809875 . 56122 PISA (Italy) > -----------------------------------------+------------------------------- > --=20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Eduardo Meyer pessoal: dudu.meyer@gmail.com profissional: ddm.farmaciap@saude.gov.br From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Jul 10 20:03:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95D51997DD9 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:03:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rizzo.unipi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x231.google.com (mail-la0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00BD91892 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:03:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rizzo.unipi@gmail.com) Received: by labgy5 with SMTP id gy5so119256468lab.2 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:03:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=iJrKlwEfIYBzs54aqXfXnBI1WGL0QvSnzbnPw/zjArQ=; b=g47Y10pAXqFI5KpFFJjRNIbaGRMwntT2G7VLXlMppAJDuA6QPrQPRmRScXTapfTPWo lEFvm3FR5xUo6sV5KBR1zQstqDuivFC1gv35xNGzGsDaFTIY7vRtanyNdMjjLx6JbaFz fC5mwjgyCZWOZviNGHrrjoMJXBo0SJ9yBRS4fukFWdycR+m37CAnbGUcVZWdMX1AiA/d 33n6nXd/2Df3b7r8QIoV/PTSh1Y3a26arSyRLF7ThXN4iNMBVSP1nb1OvT8tbBECjmXU V6fm29dTejJXaGC/TCbrOK1MXKTzG4mPziuUiUrDBrjHc1kmfEmO7CcbVozFyZTJI85l hgxg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.125.166 with SMTP id mr6mr21191830lbb.83.1436558591821; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:03:11 -0700 (PDT) Sender: rizzo.unipi@gmail.com Received: by 10.114.230.103 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:03:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 22:03:11 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: G88MMxhcQvlgUdEKbcXoKXsdLTw Message-ID: Subject: Re: netmap-ipfw: kipfw two instances sharing same port From: Luigi Rizzo To: Eduardo Meyer Cc: Pavel Odintsov , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:03:16 -0000 On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Eduardo Meyer wrote= : > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Meyer >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov < >>> pavel.odintsov@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Hello! >>> > >>> > You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instance >>> of >>> > kipfw on each pair: >>> > kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 >>> > kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix1-1 >>> > >>> > And so on ;) i have about 12 mpps with this configuration (on Linux >>> > netmap). >>> > >>> >>> Wow cool hint and cool numbers. >>> >>> I will get everything properly bridged on both kipfw instances, right? >>> >>> I need to simulate like a 3-port bridge... this would me more like >>> >>> kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 >>> kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix2-0 >>> >>> But I need the same traffic coming on the wire on ix0 to be available o= n >>> both ix1 and ix2. >>> >> >> =E2=80=8Bit won't replicate traffic on the other two ports, >> that's a different logic. >> >> cheers >> luigi >> > > yeah it's what I thought, > different queues, different packets > > what about the first approach? should I expect issues? > > kipfw netmap:ix0 netmap:ix1 > kipfw netmap:ix0 netmap:ix2 > =E2=80=8Bit won't do what anything sensible: processes will compete for packets randomly passing them to one or the other port. =E2=80=8Bcheers luigi=E2=80=8B From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri Jul 10 20:13:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACEC997F5A for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:13:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu.meyer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x22f.google.com (mail-qk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 517C71C6C for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:13:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dudu.meyer@gmail.com) Received: by qkhu186 with SMTP id u186so214547109qkh.0 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:13:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=G/u2J6d5dAU4xMQSZwm0ycCZnPPIDkrdWjr4ao+05eM=; b=PA0J/AFpjVWzq2q0Bbs4OJY2xazXK7iQeFryfLNCROe4bcZHbDetiWEMbz3a+D+EjG R1c2vq5yhCSwsRsVSEIxVHaJKKqTgDPiV844OHas5x2eR5Qz+/mZgiSBBObk5xp1nT8s ZdXJ7voyo9Z12qnQL46wT8Wv9N52QLcuKyJF8pqVrgSMdYA0fpLr2sKXVzE4/xRGYij9 9+lnAee7igtjPmi8UMEZ0MFzGRzPqvtxAWBH8pcjA3bwplf2W+KtEbEriYWrZiM3tzYR dJzJYqvfF7KhaEqDYCj5OX2D+ubGkCX2VnZnAny86GTTvGKiHjs/toM5q9jgjCWQTB7k i/gw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.231.8 with SMTP id b8mr38036803qhc.55.1436559191566; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:13:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.96.111.232 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 13:13:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 17:13:11 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: netmap-ipfw: kipfw two instances sharing same port From: Eduardo Meyer To: Luigi Rizzo Cc: Pavel Odintsov , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 20:13:12 -0000 On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Eduardo Meyer > wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Eduardo Meyer >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Pavel Odintsov < >>>> pavel.odintsov@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Hello! >>>> > >>>> > You could enable multiple queues for each NIC and run single instanc= e >>>> of >>>> > kipfw on each pair: >>>> > kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 >>>> > kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix1-1 >>>> > >>>> > And so on ;) i have about 12 mpps with this configuration (on Linux >>>> > netmap). >>>> > >>>> >>>> Wow cool hint and cool numbers. >>>> >>>> I will get everything properly bridged on both kipfw instances, right? >>>> >>>> I need to simulate like a 3-port bridge... this would me more like >>>> >>>> kipfw netmap:ix0-0 netmap:ix1-0 >>>> kipfw netmap:ix0-1 netmap:ix2-0 >>>> >>>> But I need the same traffic coming on the wire on ix0 to be available = on >>>> both ix1 and ix2. >>>> >>> >>> =E2=80=8Bit won't replicate traffic on the other two ports, >>> that's a different logic. >>> >>> cheers >>> luigi >>> >> >> yeah it's what I thought, >> different queues, different packets >> >> what about the first approach? should I expect issues? >> >> kipfw netmap:ix0 netmap:ix1 >> kipfw netmap:ix0 netmap:ix2 >> > > =E2=80=8Bit won't do what anything sensible: > processes will compete for packets randomly > passing them to one or the other port. > > =E2=80=8Bcheers > luigi=E2=80=8B > > Ok so it's a no-go for what I need, I would need to hack into kipfw to have a 3-port filtered bridge it looks like. And i don't believe there's existing code to find out which traffic should go to which port, so it's a whole new thing to code right? Thank you. --=20 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Eduardo Meyer pessoal: dudu.meyer@gmail.com profissional: ddm.farmaciap@saude.gov.br From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Jul 11 15:09:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6616099817D for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 15:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lyseconcept@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E08157A for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 15:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lyseconcept@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 43B7999817C; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 15:09:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4345499817B for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 15:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lyseconcept@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D37341579 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 15:09:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lyseconcept@gmail.com) Received: by wgxm20 with SMTP id m20so85371697wgx.3 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 08:09:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date :to:mime-version; bh=47DEQpj8HBSa+/TImW+5JCeuQeRkm5NMpJWZG3hSuFU=; b=qmLyQy5ZCNjIuL4T8uaj/88z3n/MS/+YzgSZixDV/s82S7D+4ZHBKKJTgl7an0to2c c2WIavlei/A8semk9MZT5uaYFM5THeXGCiOLUW9MXPOfPSgNHZpBxVT9AW/tNCXMd+3A Pdwnh5/EhFQN5Ycr7U1808lpQDCOGbUN5JuEIRLYsHCwKqMSG5wZhBfmjR75zox6nJUV 4ZHxxwXepNOF8jzyhUnJ9QK/BLv49JTMqNAY7qb8rlM6j8pZpx5EKJrTNHUblNTFRKM4 AxifohO4VRcEzDYOHR4KuQfhOVmhX+VTVeRNzqNye4MY2Baw8tQP6qW+6g54emQA1mMY +g4w== X-Received: by 10.180.13.199 with SMTP id j7mr7356421wic.40.1436627340292; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 08:09:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc3.home (AToulon-552-1-282-11.w86-211.abo.wanadoo.fr. [86.211.161.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fb3sm3910035wib.21.2015.07.11.08.08.54 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Jul 2015 08:08:55 -0700 (PDT) From: jean marius d'alexandris Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Bonjour Existe t il une version pour Mac OS X 10.8 merci d'avance jean Marius Message-Id: <68C66B51-6C3D-42B3-B718-EDC68326DA7E@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 17:08:59 +0200 To: net@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 15:09:02 -0000