From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 06:55:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18E43F2E for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 06:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x236.google.com (mail-wg0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB6B1CF7 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 06:55:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id b13so33341908wgh.13 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 22:55:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=t3NWvP/w2iLWMYXavs4eWG4LKYkd0WM7hYEWOvahsjg=; b=AcXN38zI13hhRCmHTjHw/2bv+uvBXH9V55DvAltE9fIDmI29zTfk3C5tfhFapICKS5 lTAadnT2MrSp84DJms+tzoz8JMzTGir9OHUcpNHHSjDADacHC6HlN+w/gYrNouzYRTOb M3wHsWg7sBGXAciIDi8ireH8BIPJ/1VOx8FPgiYABTUfKMy6hAyWGFdkGOes2Kq0kh9W sL3evCuym0VcUpLJU/xtG7xny0RKuij3RzWdy3cg/XMvOVkcHzVJTlevLrbByBJn3Qdp zA3qEALx3Uc9/gzludYUdAaGF2WOzPZSQoy0o2pI1XxuNwIZoxUPNk5LhjZ+ygAUvpz1 1tOw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.14.136 with SMTP id p8mr11611687wic.20.1422773735084; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 22:55:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.131.166 with HTTP; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 22:55:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54C8AC60.3080200@interlinked.me> References: <54C8AC60.3080200@interlinked.me> Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 00:55:35 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Selecting at least one option out of multiple groups From: Scot Hetzel To: Elizabeth Myers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 06:55:37 -0000 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 3:31 AM, Elizabeth Myers wrote: > Hello, > > I am porting a piece of software (purple-plugin-pack) to FreeBSD. It > contains numerous plugins for Pidgin all under one pack (over 50). They Is this going to be one port that installs over 50 plugins (based on what is selected), or is it going to be over 50+1 ports? +1 port (pidgin-purple-plugin-pack) [meta-port (see x11/kde4 for an example)] - allows you to select which purple plugins to install (depends on selected pidgin-purple-plugin-* ports) over 50 ports - individual port for each plugin (i.e. graphics/pidgin-purple-plugin-album net-im/pidgin-purple-plugin-autoprofile net-im/pidgin-purple-plugin-autoreply net-im/pidgin-purple-plugin-awaynotify shells/pidgin-purple-plugin-bash ...) - allows individual plugins to be installed/de-installed without having to re-install the purple-plugin-pack Note: you could also drop the -purple-plugin from the individual port names (i.e. graphics/pidgin-album). Just identify that the plugin is from the purple-plugin pack in the pkg-descr file for each port. > all compile, but I want to make it configurable which plugins are > installed, but it makes no sense unless at least one plugin is set. So > far I have the following: > > 8<========== snip ==========>8 > OPTIONS_MULTI= plugins > OPTIONS_MULTI_PLUGINS= ALBUM AUTOPROFILE AUTOREPLY AWAYNOTIFY BASH > BIT \ ... > 8<========== snip ==========>8 > > Which is fine and works as expected (at least one option must be > selected). However, here is my dilemma. Some of the plugins provide > additional protocols. I'd like to group them under their own section, > since there's at least 5 or so, and it's logical for those who just want > additional protocols without the other fluff. > If you go the over 50+1 ports route, each port could have it's own option settings. -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were maimed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 10:43:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2915A4FB for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 10:43:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wilcox-tech.com (mail.foxkit.us [192.99.209.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.wilcox-tech.com", Issuer "mail.wilcox-tech.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D60503E9 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 10:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15132 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2015 10:44:53 -0000 Received: from ip68-13-243-137.ok.ok.cox.net (HELO ?192.168.1.253?) (emyers@wilcox-tech.com@68.13.243.137) by mail.foxkit.us with ESMTPA; 1 Feb 2015 10:44:53 -0000 Message-ID: <54CE034D.6030502@interlinked.me> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 04:43:25 -0600 From: Elizabeth Myers User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scot Hetzel Subject: Re: Selecting at least one option out of multiple groups References: <54C8AC60.3080200@interlinked.me> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 10:43:32 -0000 On 02/01/15 00:55, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 3:31 AM, Elizabeth Myers > wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I am porting a piece of software (purple-plugin-pack) to FreeBSD. It >> contains numerous plugins for Pidgin all under one pack (over 50). They > > Is this going to be one port that installs over 50 plugins (based on > what is selected), or is it going to be over 50+1 ports? I was thinking one port, since they come as a pack, and the idea of adding over 50 ports to the tree is... well, that's 50 ports I'd have to submit. That's quite an undertaking. > +1 port (pidgin-purple-plugin-pack) [meta-port (see x11/kde4 for an example)] > - allows you to select which purple plugins to install (depends on > selected pidgin-purple-plugin-* ports) If there's a meta port, I guess it wouldn't matter if no plugins were selected by it? I still think it'd be ideal to categorise them in the meta port, at least by protocol/general use. > over 50 ports > - individual port for each plugin (i.e. > graphics/pidgin-purple-plugin-album > net-im/pidgin-purple-plugin-autoprofile > net-im/pidgin-purple-plugin-autoreply > net-im/pidgin-purple-plugin-awaynotify > shells/pidgin-purple-plugin-bash > ...) > - allows individual plugins to be installed/de-installed without > having to re-install the purple-plugin-pack This is definitely appealing, I will admit. > If you go the over 50+1 ports route, each port could have it's own > option settings. So far none of the plugins in the pack have their own option settings, as far as I can tell. This does leave open the possibility, though. -- Cheers, Elizabeth Myers From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 10:55:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E2EC73F for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 10:55:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.wilcox-tech.com (mail.foxkit.us [192.99.209.192]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.wilcox-tech.com", Issuer "mail.wilcox-tech.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B48B66A2 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 10:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20690 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2015 10:56:35 -0000 Received: from ip68-13-243-137.ok.ok.cox.net (HELO ?192.168.1.253?) (emyers@wilcox-tech.com@68.13.243.137) by mail.foxkit.us with ESMTPA; 1 Feb 2015 10:56:35 -0000 Message-ID: <54CE060D.8040902@interlinked.me> Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 04:55:09 -0600 From: Elizabeth Myers User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ports@freebsd.org >> FreeBSD Ports" Subject: [NEW PORT] x11-fonts/symbola - a Unicode 7.0 font Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 10:55:12 -0000 Hello, I'm posting this in case the bugzilla issue got lost in the noise. I know four days is a bit hasty, though *puts on flameproof garments*. See issue: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197090 This font also contains numerous emoji, which is what I use for emoji support here. Not in colour, of course, but it's still better than nothing. If anyone has any comments/rotten tomatoes to pelt at me, go right on ahead. -- Cheers, Elizabeth From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 11:09:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEDB2978 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 11:09:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cpsmtpb-ews03.kpnxchange.com (cpsmtpb-ews03.kpnxchange.com [213.75.39.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293AF7DE for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 11:09:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cpsps-ews29.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.195]) by cpsmtpb-ews03.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Sun, 1 Feb 2015 12:07:58 +0100 Received: from CPSMTPM-CMT108.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.24]) by cpsps-ews29.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Sun, 1 Feb 2015 12:07:58 +0100 Received: from donald.offrom.nl ([77.170.60.162]) by CPSMTPM-CMT108.kpnxchange.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.0.6002.18264); Sun, 1 Feb 2015 12:07:57 +0100 Received: from squid (squid.offrom.nl [192.168.0.72]) by donald.offrom.nl (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t11B7tXe081444 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 12:07:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Willy@Offermans.Rompen.nl) Received: from willy by squid with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YHsNf-0007oU-Mx for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2015 12:07:55 +0100 Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 12:07:55 +0100 From: Willy Offermans To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: net/isc-dhcp42-server and ldap support Message-ID: <20150201110755.GA29354@vpn.offrom.nl> Reply-To: Willy@Offermans.Rompen.nl MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on donald.offrom.nl X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Feb 2015 11:07:58.0036 (UTC) FILETIME=[55E6B940:01D03E0F] X-RcptDomain: freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 11:09:12 -0000 Dear FreeBSD friends, I like to install net/isc-dhcp42-server with LDAP and LDAP_SSL support. However upon compilation, I received the following error message: gmake[3]: Entering directory '/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.7/omapip' cc -O2 -pipe -fPIC -fstack-protector -DLDAP_DEPRECATED -fno-strict-aliasing -I../bind/include -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib -fstack-protector -o svtest test.o libomapi.a ../bind/lib/libdns.a ../bind/lib/libisc.a -llber -lldap -L/usr/local/lib -lssl libomapi.a(buffer.o): In function `omapi_connection_copyin': buffer.c:(.text+0x76b): undefined reference to `isc__socket_fdwatchpoke' libomapi.a(dispatch.o): In function `omapi_register_io_object': dispatch.c:(.text+0x3aa): undefined reference to `isc__socket_fdwatchcreate' libomapi.a(dispatch.o): In function `omapi_reregister_io_object': dispatch.c:(.text+0x50d): undefined reference to `isc__socket_fdwatchpoke' libomapi.a(dispatch.o): In function `omapi_unregister_io_object': dispatch.c:(.text+0x677): undefined reference to `isc__socket_cancel' dispatch.c:(.text+0x67f): undefined reference to `isc__socket_detach' libomapi.a(isclib.o): In function `isclib_cleanup': isclib.c:(.text+0x27): undefined reference to `isc__task_shutdown' isclib.c:(.text+0x30): undefined reference to `isc__task_detach' isclib.c:(.text+0x40): undefined reference to `isc__timermgr_destroy' isclib.c:(.text+0x50): undefined reference to `isc__socketmgr_destroy' isclib.c:(.text+0x60): undefined reference to `isc__taskmgr_destroy' isclib.c:(.text+0x6f): undefined reference to `isc__app_ctxfinish' isclib.c:(.text+0x86): undefined reference to `isc__appctx_destroy' isclib.c:(.text+0x9e): undefined reference to `isc__mem_detach' libomapi.a(isclib.o): In function `dhcp_context_create': isclib.c:(.text+0x10b): undefined reference to `isc__mem_create' isclib.c:(.text+0x12c): undefined reference to `isc__appctx_create' isclib.c:(.text+0x13d): undefined reference to `isc__app_ctxstart' isclib.c:(.text+0x1a6): undefined reference to `isc__task_create' libomapi.a(isclib.o): In function `dhcp_signal_handler': isclib.c:(.text+0x446): undefined reference to `isc__app_ctxsuspend' cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) gmake[3]: *** [svtest] Error 1 Makefile:390: recipe for target 'svtest' failed gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.7/omapip' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Makefile:412: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.7' *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server How can I compile isc-dhcp42-server with LDAP and LDAP_SSL support? -- Met vriendelijke groeten, With kind regards, Mit freundlichen Gruessen, De jrus wah, Wiel ************************************* W.K. Offermans Powered by .... (__) \\\'',) \/ \ ^ .\._/_) www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 22:38:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B8F3878 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 22:38:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (cl-1657.chi-02.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4978:f:678::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A789EE49 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 22:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id t11Mbpr6032332; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 14:37:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201502012237.t11Mbpr6032332@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 14:37:51 -0800 (PST) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: testing the value of ${CXX} in ports Makefile To: jbeich@vfemail.net In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 22:38:02 -0000 On 31 Jan, Jan Beich wrote: > Don Lewis writes: > >> PORTNAME= junk >> PORTVERSION= 0.0.0 >> CATEGORIES= devel >> DISTFILES= >> >> MAINTAINER= truckman@FreeBSD.org >> COMMENT= junk >> >> USE_GCC= 4.9+ >> >> .include >> >> post-patch: >> echo CXX=${CXX} >> .if ${CXX} == g++49 > > This idiom may lead to crashes. According to the wiki[1] mixing > libstdc++ and libc++ is only supported when both are linked against > libcxxrt. lang/gcc by default use libsupc++, so you'd have to add Yeah, been there, done that. I found this out firsthand on FreeBSD 10 when I pulled in a dependency that was compiled with clang. > USES= compiler:gcc-c++11-lib > > to force the port use devel/libc++. At least for now I'm happy to stick with libstdc++. The code currently doesn't even compile with clang, hence USES_GCC=yes. If I USES= compiler:gcc-c++11-lib > Also, the following wouldn't work > > .if ${CHOSEN_COMPILER_TYPE} == "gcc" && ${COMPILER_VERSION} == 49 > > because COMPILER_VERSION or COMPILER_FEATURES are evaluated against > COMPILER_TYPE, not CHOSEN_COMPILER_TYPE. Yup, that appears to be the case. > [1] https://wiki.freebsd.org/NewC++Stack#Mixing_Libraries_using_Libc.2B-.2B-_and_Libstdc.2B-.2B- USES=compiler:gcc-c++11-lib allows me to force GCC, but it looks like I always get the default version from ports and USE_GCC is ignored. CXX is still not updated early enough. PORTNAME= junk PORTVERSION= 0.0.0 CATEGORIES= devel DISTFILES= MAINTAINER= truckman@FreeBSD.org COMMENT= junk USES= compiler:gcc-c++11-lib .include post-patch: @echo CXX=${CXX} @echo GCC_DEFAULT=${GCC_DEFAULT} @echo CHOSEN_COMPILER_TYPE=${CHOSEN_COMPILER_TYPE} .if ${CXX} == g++48 @echo g++48 was detected .endif .if ${CXX} == c++ @echo .if thinks CXX is still clang .endif .include # make patch ===> Patching for junk-0.0.0 CXX=g++48 GCC_DEFAULT=4.8 CHOSEN_COMPILER_TYPE=gcc .if thinks CXX is still clang From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 1 22:44:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8075495F for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 22:44:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (cl-1657.chi-02.us.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:4978:f:678::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04439EF7 for ; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 22:44:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id t11MiTkw032345; Sun, 1 Feb 2015 14:44:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201502012244.t11MiTkw032345@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2015 14:44:29 -0800 (PST) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: testing the value of ${CXX} in ports Makefile To: FreeBSD@shaneware.biz In-Reply-To: <54CC8935.5020906@ShaneWare.Biz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 22:44:41 -0000 On 31 Jan, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 31/01/2015 10:55, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 31 Jan, Shane Ambler wrote: >>> On 30/01/2015 14:13, Don Lewis wrote: > >> post-patch: >> @echo CXX=${CXX} >> @echo GCC_DEFAULT=${GCC_DEFAULT} >> .if ${CHOSEN_COMPILER_TYPE} == gcc and ${COMPILER_VERSION} == 49 >> @echo g++49 was detected >> .else >> @echo g++49 was not detected >> .endif >> >> # make patch >> make: "/usr/ports/editors/junk/Makefile" line 17: Malformed conditional (${CHOSEN_COMPILER_TYPE} == gcc and ${COMPILER_VERSION} == 49) >> make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue > > yeah my bad - don't know why I typed `and` instead of `&&` > >>> You may also want to consider patching with - >>> >>> #if (__GNUC__ == 4) && (__GNUC_MINOR__ == 9) >>> // 4.9 specific changes >>> #endif >> >> That would work if I was patching C or C++ code, but I'm actually patching >> a file that is used to set the the -O value for CFLAGS. The build stuff >> in the port is pretty strange and uses different optimization levels for >> for different parts of the build and one of choices that it makes >> triggers a code generation bug in gcc 4.9. > > What is the build system used? > > Can the build files do something like > > COMPVERS=`${CXX} --version | grep -e gcc -e 4.9` > if [ ! -z $COMPVERS ] > ${CXX} -O2 > else > ${CXX} -Os > fi As near as I can figure out, it's a mixture of gmake and dmake kicked off by a perl wrapper and both flavors have to be patched. It just seems easier to use four lines of shell code to change two instances of -Os than to try to figure out how to get two different flavors of make to do what I want (and verify that it actually works). I could maybe use the time I save on creating a gcc bug report and getting the compiler fixed. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 05:00:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8DCA6B2 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 05:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nschwmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com (nschwmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.189.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7FA97F for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 05:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nschwcmgw08p ([61.9.190.168]) by nschwmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20150202050054.HDVL23397.nschwmtas03p.mx.bigpond.com@nschwcmgw08p>; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 05:00:54 +0000 Received: from hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au ([203.41.22.114]) by nschwcmgw08p with BigPond Outbound id nH0t1p00D2ThMyb01H0t4D; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 05:00:54 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=F6HVh9dN c=1 sm=1 a=tBIanQelQkU72CJWnm+MWA==:17 a=XD52yEjQpfAA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=GHIR_BbyAAAA:8 a=0HtSIViG9nkA:10 a=NEAV23lmAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=xMqRJfp6E8vYTRfU6HMA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=qX2WUoyAXkUA:10 a=aeXgb-RCXw0A:10 a=tBIanQelQkU72CJWnm+MWA==:117 Received: from [10.0.5.3] (ewsw01.hs [10.0.5.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by hermes.heuristicsystems.com.au (8.14.5/8.13.6) with ESMTP id t1250OaU017475 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:00:29 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dewayne.geraghty@heuristicsystems.com.au) Message-ID: <54CF0466.9020201@heuristicsystems.com.au> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:00:22 +1100 From: Dewayne Geraghty User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Morante Subject: Re: Use GCC only for specific ARCH References: <5488002D.6080200@morante.net> In-Reply-To: <5488002D.6080200@morante.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 05:00:57 -0000 On 10/12/2014 7:11 PM, Daniel Morante wrote: > I have a port that builds fine on a 9.3 amd64, but on 9.3 i386 it > fails on this line: > > inline int64 GetMaxMoney() { return nBestHeight <= HARDFORK_HEIGHT_1 ? > 50000000000 * COIN : 25000000000 * COIN; } > > With the following error: > > "integer constant is too large for 'long' type" > > If I add "USE_GCC=yes" to the port's Makefile, it builds successfully > on i386. I'd like to apply this 'fix' only to the 32-bit platform so > I did the following: > > .if ${ARCH} == "i386" > USE_GCC=yes > .endif > > Is that the 'correct' way to do things? > > The port can be found here: > https://github.com/tuaris/FreeBSD-Coin-Ports/blob/master/ports/kittehcoin/Makefile#L80 > > Daniel, In addition to USE_GCC=yes in your make.conf, you'll also need to add to /etc/libmap.conf libgcc_s.so.1 gcc48/libgcc_s.so.1 libgomp.so.1 gcc48/libgomp.so.1 libobjc.so.4 gcc48/libobjc.so.2 libssp.so.0 gcc48/libssp.so.0 libstdc++.so.6 gcc48/libstdc++.so.6 # I don't believe I use these, but to easily avoid further troubleshooting, they're here libatomic.so.1 gcc48/libatomic.so.1 libgomp.so.1 gcc48gcc48/libgomp.so.1 libquadmath.so.0 gcc48/libquadmath.so.0 So with libmap.conf configured, a simple cd /usr/ports/security/nmap && make clean deinstall package; pkg add nmap-6.47.txz results in, I've added the '<<<<<' for reference: # ldd /usr/local/bin/nmap /usr/local/bin/nmap: libpcre.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.1 (0x80095d000) libpcap.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libpcap.so.1 (0x800bd0000) libssl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x800e15000) libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x801081000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/gcc48/libstdc++.so.6 (0x80148c000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x801796000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/gcc48/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x8019bd000) <<<<<< libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x801bd2000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x801f76000) without libmap.conf you'll have /usr/local/bin/nmap: libpcre.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.1 (0x80095d000) libpcap.so.1 => /usr/local/lib/libpcap.so.1 (0x800bd0000) libssl.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.8 (0x800e15000) libcrypto.so.8 => /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x801081000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/gcc48/libstdc++.so.6 (0x80148c000) libm.so.5 => /lib/libm.so.5 (0x801796000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x8019bd000) <<<<<< libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x801bcb000) libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x801f6f000) Aside: I came across this as I was getting 'bus error' while building /usr/ports/security/p5-IO-Socket-SSL with march=prescott. As it turns out, the problem was repeatable with echo 'eval { require Net::SSLeay; $Net::SSLeay::trace=1; Net::SSLeay::randomize(); };' > /tmp/a; perl /tmp/a bus error Rebuilding SSLEAY and perl5.20 with gcc enabled me to continue working, without changing my CFLAGS statement CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe -g0 -ggdb0 -march=prescott -mtune=prescott -fno-strict-aliasing I initially tried to turn off stack-protector, however even applying to /etc/make.conf WITHOUT_SSP=yes SSP_UNSAFE=yes perl5.20 continued to add --stack-protector to CFLAGS. Yes, I even mv bsd.ssp.mk bsd.ssp.mk-hide; touch bsd.ssp.mk it was simply too elusive... I should mention that I added to make.conf the following as I also use ccache (3.2) CC:=/usr/local/libexec/ccache/gcc48 cc:=/usr/local/libexec/ccache/gcc48 gcc48:=/usr/local/libexec/ccache/gcc48 CXX:=/usr/local/libexec/ccache/g++48 c++:=/usr/local/libexec/ccache/g++48 g++48:=/usr/local/libexec/ccache/g++48 I suspect that I should only need CC and CXX, but I'm not very technical. Thanks for your hint about USE_GCC=yes in make.conf, along with https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/custom-gcc/configuring-ports-gcc.html It started me down an alternate road :) After clearing the ccache and /var/ports, my first attempt of using gcc48 using -march pentium3 (on i386) and core2 (on amd64), failed to build 7 ports; interestingly using clang they successfully built all 655 packages. (??) Regards, Dewayne. -- For the talkers: “The superior man acts before he speaks, and afterwards speaks according to his action.” For everyone else: “Life is really simple, but we insist on making it complicated.” From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 07:26:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6EA927C for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 07:26:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90A7E9B9 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 07:26:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7::6c9a:cbdb:e71:930b] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:6c9a:cbdb:e71:930b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D8825C2E; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:26:48 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Use GCC only for specific ARCH Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B4E31A69-7CF3-4AF2-B290-86C2E30A68D1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b4 (755500a+) From: Dimitry Andric In-Reply-To: <20141210082930.GA92094@elch.exwg.net> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 08:26:43 +0100 Message-Id: References: <5488002D.6080200@morante.net> <20141210082930.GA92094@elch.exwg.net> To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 07:26:51 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_B4E31A69-7CF3-4AF2-B290-86C2E30A68D1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 10 Dec 2014, at 09:29, Christoph Moench-Tegeder = wrote: >=20 > ## Daniel Morante (daniel@morante.net): >=20 >> I have a port that builds fine on a 9.3 amd64, but on 9.3 i386 it = fails >> on this line: >>=20 >> inline int64 GetMaxMoney() { return nBestHeight <=3D = HARDFORK_HEIGHT_1 ? >> 50000000000 * COIN : 25000000000 * COIN; } >>=20 >> With the following error: >>=20 >> "integer constant is too large for 'long' type" >=20 > I believe the fix is to make sure those constants are interpreted as > "long long", e.g. by post-fixing LL. Or by using the ugly-looking, but more portable INT64_C() macro. -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_B4E31A69-7CF3-4AF2-B290-86C2E30A68D1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.26 iEYEARECAAYFAlTPJrcACgkQsF6jCi4glqMCWwCdFzSfe9jnp0eK4hJzYub478lv c78AnjFdKJYs/Ozr2yjEZaoTaZrHViun =Ka11 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_B4E31A69-7CF3-4AF2-B290-86C2E30A68D1-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 09:36:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9448F48E for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:36:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 806E58D2 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:36:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t129aMS7059111 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:36:22 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t129aMRc059109; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:36:22 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201502020936.t129aMRc059109@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:36:22 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 09:36:22 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ textproc/py-jaxml | 3.02 | 18.02 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/bluefish | 2.2.6 | 2.2.7 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 09:46:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 524DA6DD for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cpsmtpb-ews02.kpnxchange.com (cpsmtpb-ews02.kpnxchange.com [213.75.39.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF1E39CA for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 09:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cpsps-ews06.kpnxchange.com ([10.94.84.173]) by cpsmtpb-ews02.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:45:32 +0100 Received: from CPSMTPM-CMT106.kpnxchange.com ([195.121.3.22]) by cpsps-ews06.kpnxchange.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.17514); Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:45:31 +0100 Received: from donald.offrom.nl ([77.170.60.162]) by CPSMTPM-CMT106.kpnxchange.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.0.6002.18264); Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:45:31 +0100 Received: from squid (squid.vpn.offrom.nl [10.168.0.72]) by donald.offrom.nl (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t129jSnc092152; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:45:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from Willy@Offermans.Rompen.nl) Received: from willy by squid with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YIDZL-0007bY-9w; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 10:45:23 +0100 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:45:23 +0100 From: Willy Offermans To: Willy Offermans Subject: Re: net/isc-dhcp42-server and ldap support Message-ID: <20150202094523.GA5143@vpn.offrom.nl> Reply-To: Willy@Offermans.Rompen.nl References: <20150201110755.GA29354@vpn.offrom.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150201110755.GA29354@vpn.offrom.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on donald.offrom.nl X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Feb 2015 09:45:31.0655 (UTC) FILETIME=[FC0AA170:01D03ECC] X-RcptDomain: freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 09:46:47 -0000 Dear FreeBSD friends, I can report that I can compile isc-dhcp41-server with LDAP and LDAP_SSL support and that I'm __not__ able to compile isc-dhcp42-server and isc-dhcp43-server with LDAP and LDAP_SSL support. The error for isc-dhcp42-server can be found below, after the error of isc-dhcp43-server. B.t.w. I'm running FreeBSD 10.1 Despite the fact that I can understand the error message of isc-dhcp43-server, I do not fully agree with it. I can imagine that isc-dhcp41-server-4.1.e_9,2 and isc-dhcp43-server-4.3.1 will copy files into the same place, but compiling is different from installation! If the error-message would appear upon ``make install'', then I would agree, but now the error-message is inappropriate to my opinion. root@kwik:/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp43-server # make ===> isc-dhcp43-server-4.3.1 conflicts with installed package(s): isc-dhcp41-server-4.1.e_9,2 They install files into the same place. You may want to stop build with Ctrl + C. ===> License ISCL accepted by the user ===> Found saved configuration for isc-dhcp43-server-4.3.1 ===> isc-dhcp43-server-4.3.1 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by isc-dhcp43-server-4.3.1 for building ===> isc-dhcp43-server-4.3.1 conflicts with installed package(s): isc-dhcp41-server-4.1.e_9,2 They will not build together. Please remove them first with pkg delete. *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp43-server *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp43-server root@kwik:/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp43-server # On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 12:07:55PM +0100, Willy Offermans wrote: > Dear FreeBSD friends, > > I like to install net/isc-dhcp42-server with LDAP and LDAP_SSL support. > However upon compilation, I received the following error message: > > gmake[3]: Entering directory > '/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.7/omapip' > cc -O2 -pipe -fPIC -fstack-protector -DLDAP_DEPRECATED > -fno-strict-aliasing -I../bind/include -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib > -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib > -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib -fstack-protector -o svtest test.o > libomapi.a ../bind/lib/libdns.a ../bind/lib/libisc.a -llber -lldap > -L/usr/local/lib -lssl > libomapi.a(buffer.o): In function `omapi_connection_copyin': > buffer.c:(.text+0x76b): undefined reference to `isc__socket_fdwatchpoke' > libomapi.a(dispatch.o): In function `omapi_register_io_object': > dispatch.c:(.text+0x3aa): undefined reference to > `isc__socket_fdwatchcreate' > libomapi.a(dispatch.o): In function `omapi_reregister_io_object': > dispatch.c:(.text+0x50d): undefined reference to `isc__socket_fdwatchpoke' > libomapi.a(dispatch.o): In function `omapi_unregister_io_object': > dispatch.c:(.text+0x677): undefined reference to `isc__socket_cancel' > dispatch.c:(.text+0x67f): undefined reference to `isc__socket_detach' > libomapi.a(isclib.o): In function `isclib_cleanup': > isclib.c:(.text+0x27): undefined reference to `isc__task_shutdown' > isclib.c:(.text+0x30): undefined reference to `isc__task_detach' > isclib.c:(.text+0x40): undefined reference to `isc__timermgr_destroy' > isclib.c:(.text+0x50): undefined reference to `isc__socketmgr_destroy' > isclib.c:(.text+0x60): undefined reference to `isc__taskmgr_destroy' > isclib.c:(.text+0x6f): undefined reference to `isc__app_ctxfinish' > isclib.c:(.text+0x86): undefined reference to `isc__appctx_destroy' > isclib.c:(.text+0x9e): undefined reference to `isc__mem_detach' > libomapi.a(isclib.o): In function `dhcp_context_create': > isclib.c:(.text+0x10b): undefined reference to `isc__mem_create' > isclib.c:(.text+0x12c): undefined reference to `isc__appctx_create' > isclib.c:(.text+0x13d): undefined reference to `isc__app_ctxstart' > isclib.c:(.text+0x1a6): undefined reference to `isc__task_create' > libomapi.a(isclib.o): In function `dhcp_signal_handler': > isclib.c:(.text+0x446): undefined reference to `isc__app_ctxsuspend' > cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see > invocation) > gmake[3]: *** [svtest] Error 1 > Makefile:390: recipe for target 'svtest' failed > gmake[3]: Leaving directory > '/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.7/omapip' > gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > Makefile:412: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed > gmake[2]: Leaving directory > '/usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server/work/dhcp-4.2.7' > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/net/isc-dhcp42-server > > How can I compile isc-dhcp42-server with LDAP and LDAP_SSL support? > > > -- > Met vriendelijke groeten, > With kind regards, > Mit freundlichen Gruessen, > De jrus wah, > > Wiel > > ************************************* > W.K. Offermans > > Powered by .... > > (__) > \\\'',) > \/ \ ^ > .\._/_) > > www.FreeBSD.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Met vriendelijke groeten, With kind regards, Mit freundlichen Gruessen, De jrus wah, Wiel ************************************* W.K. Offermans Powered by .... (__) \\\'',) \/ \ ^ .\._/_) www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 15:52:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D69FFF02 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 15:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.mimar.rs (smtp.mimar.rs [193.53.106.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C01849 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 15:52:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vscan.mimar.rs (vscan.mimar.rs [193.53.106.134]) by smtp.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB8389470 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:43:15 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mimar.rs; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :x-mailer:message-id:subject:subject:from:from:date:date :received:received; s=mimar-0901; t=1422891788; x=1424706189; bh=0XG3XXelT4jFvVJaZLKD6dMqs/eNqJqt2W8PZWIA4M0=; b=nz4dLFenhbJw jv8C03yLn+BCy/n47bk9LcLaxcWgmeR2DnRB1Gefaf507RF864Th/Wps7p4YuWJx wUUB8GrPIE7v6qIOMNgt1NG47zzwgvpu6LciMzEMKXGuC80+gppEAlUl2VHlbusn w9QNReiF/8rCitFai8mO0Plf3XWp1hw= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mimar.rs Received: from smtp.mimar.rs ([193.53.106.135]) by vscan.mimar.rs (vscan.mimar.rs [193.53.106.134]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id n_sM3KtLicGv for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:43:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from efreet.mimar.rs (nat.kappastar.com [193.53.106.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marko.cupac@mimar.rs) by smtp.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4D1689460 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:43:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:43:01 +0100 From: Marko =?UTF-8?B?Q3VwYcSH?= To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: mail/dovecot2: who calls doveconf upon boot? Message-ID: <20150202164301.29d6d14b@efreet.mimar.rs> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 15:52:52 -0000 Hi, for a few years I had all the components of my e-mail system on single server. This includes mainly postfix as smtp server, amavisd-new and clamav for content scanning, and dovecot2 as imap server. Now I want to split it so every major component gets its own host. I have first moved dovecot2 to another server, which worked without any problems. Next, I moved amavisd-new and clamav which also went OK. Finally, I moved postfix and it appears to work OK, however there's this console message upon boot saying: doveconf: Fatal: open(/usr/local/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf) failed: No such file or directory (copy example configs from /usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/example-config/) My question is: Who calls doveconf, and for what purpose? Dovecot is installed on this server only because as postfix' dependency, and it does not have record in rc.conf. This is on 10.1-RELEASE-p5, with postfix-2.11.3_3,1 with dovecot2 option, and dovecot2-2.2.15_2, both built in poudriere. Thank you in advance, --=20 Marko Cupa=C4=87 https://www.mimar.rs From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 16:05:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DF733BF for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thyme.infocus-llc.com (thyme.infocus-llc.com [199.15.120.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9B1D972 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:05:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-65-60-66.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.65.60.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by thyme.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42DA137B402; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:05:21 -0600 (CST) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3kbYsD59zZz2QH; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:05:20 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:05:20 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Marko =?utf-8?B?Q3VwYcSH?= Subject: Re: mail/dovecot2: who calls doveconf upon boot? Message-ID: <20150202160520.GB79227@over-yonder.net> References: <20150202164301.29d6d14b@efreet.mimar.rs> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20150202164301.29d6d14b@efreet.mimar.rs> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23-fullermd.4 (2014-03-12) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.6 at thyme.infocus-llc.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:05:29 -0000 On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 04:43:01PM +0100 I heard the voice of Marko Cupać, and lo! it spake thus: > > My question is: Who calls doveconf, and for what purpose? A quick look at the dovecot.in rc script in the ports tree suggests that it's unconditionally running dovecot when it's run try try and populate base_dir, whether $dovecot_enable or not. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 16:48:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 248F7646 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8725EEA for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YIKB5-000Fav-7g; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 17:48:47 +0100 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:48:47 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Marko Cupa?? , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail/dovecot2: who calls doveconf upon boot? Message-ID: <20150202164847.GH44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150202164301.29d6d14b@efreet.mimar.rs> <20150202160520.GB79227@over-yonder.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150202160520.GB79227@over-yonder.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 16:48:50 -0000 Hi! > > My question is: Who calls doveconf, and for what purpose? > > A quick look at the dovecot.in rc script in the ports tree suggests > that it's unconditionally running dovecot when it's run try try and > populate base_dir, whether $dovecot_enable or not. I prepared a patch that tries to fix it: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197275 Marko: Can you test wether it works for you ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 19:00:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEB4EB37 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 19:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com (mail-la0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 537342ED for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 19:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id hz20so44060893lab.6 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 11:00:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=XHg5YDkpc4wYH2Ksyu0qmqRC5fAaCkMp2qOOjEDjIfY=; b=YeEN2heIEmBj+r6e6K71swaiXkrvvTx4V0ue8eGiUsIW5kGTf234KwvAhIydpTAGqP XSHb8uzEq8WTy1oeoQQpszETRGrZ9CMdJ79GGMdJPILhfPe5ekBeGX909p873qktjieP eiE9mRX8zONM+Kfbd2yQN9JqTDtv66E15il1Mn9cVJozGRqLB0D8OTlVY5hzPc3UtO5N X76i7LhGmol7zCVTSMuR6/8UCaqtLEYQ35PFOe14GVCTrfo/dIPWedu5oS3AkSy/21la KqxzQf5bHDenDvxDXiG9LHAg/N97D/8CKCcZyrSClfm23ggsxjZttpXLhGtaN+uC3NO0 LYlw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.8.1 with SMTP id n1mr20325250laa.47.1422903647288; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 11:00:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.21.14 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 11:00:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20150126152433.52f07277f377f9396b65c9a8@mimar.rs> <20150127.002919.335530336.yasu@utahime.org> <20150126163934.32f199d43d86a70b00dd7e4a@mimar.rs> <20150127.010539.230444205.yasu@utahime.org> <54C6695E.6010704@freebsd.org> <20150126212514.56c8f0866f1d63bb98089dd0@mimar.rs> <20150126235655.5d371915@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <20150127035200.GF44537@home.opsec.eu> <54C73A0E.8050501@FreeBSD.org> <20150127115151.afeb1ee969a562e8f42e300c@mimar.rs> <20150128155846.76d77a18@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 11:00:47 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: www/squid does not shutdown via rc From: Nick Rogers To: Kevin Oberman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML , "Dr. Peter Voigt" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 19:00:50 -0000 On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: > > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:51:51 +0100 > > Marko Cupa=C4=87 wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:11:10 +0000 > > > Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > > > > > On 2015/01/27 03:52, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > > > > Doesn't installing a custom kernel break freebsd-update ? > > > > > > > > No. freebsd-update has always supported using a custom kernel. It > > > > helps if you name your kernel something other than GENERIC, which > > > > you do by creating a modofoed kernel config file > > > > in /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf (or i386 if that's your architecture): > > > > eg. > > > > > > > > % cat FOO > > > > include GENERIC > > > > > > > > ident FOO > > > > > > > > and then add: > > > > > > > > KERNCONF=3D FOO > > > > > > > > to /etc/make.conf > > > > > > > > You should also edit /etc/freebsd-update.conf and change the > > > > 'Components' line to remove 'kernel' from the list. > > > > > > > > None of this is absolutely necessary, but it will help you avoid > > > > accidentally ending up with the generic kernel. > > > > > > > > In any case, what you will need to do is rebuild your kernel and > > > > reinstall it any time freebsd-update touches the kernel. You can > > > > use freebsd-update to maintain the kernel sources, which will pull > > > > in the needed updates to the kernel sources. > > > > > > The timing for this is really unfortunate for me, because I have just > > > re-installed my FreeBSD fleet of some 20 virtual servers without > > > sources included, and I just introduced "binary only" policy (ok I do > > > build my own ports on one server in poudriere, but all other servers > > > use packages). > > > > > > I guess theoretically it is possible to make "kernel build server" > > > which will build custom kernel for distribution to other servers. I > > > am just not sure how will RELEASE userland tolerate STABLE kernel. > > > > > > Does this sound reasonable? Any tips? > > > > > > Thank you in advance, > > > > Thanks to all who contributed to this thread. > > > > Sorry for the late response. I've had guests for hte past few days and > simply have not had time to properly address your concerns. > > While most of these concerns are not an issue, exactly why gets a bit mor= e > complex. And there are some real issues, but this is an exceptionally > simple case and eliminates most of them. See comments in-line. > > > > > @Kevin: > > Your outline of kernel patching procedure is helpful and corresponds > > in most aspects what I have thought so far. I aggree with you that > > patching, building and installing a custom kernel can be managed. And I > > am sure that I can do it. > > > > So getting a custom kernel installed is one thing but keeping your > > system in a manageable way is another. Kurt and Mattew pointed out that > > you want to keep freebsd-update working in a reliable way and this > > obviously needs some manual interaction. Information about it is > > not too easily gathered and answers given here still leave some > > question open to me. > > > > It does, but very little. In general, freebsd-update is a binary update > tool. While it does update sources, if they are present, it makes no use = of > those sources. > > My instructions provided for saving the GENERIC kernel where freebsd-upda= te > will use it instead of the running kernel. /boot/GENERIC is used only be > freebsd-update. It is otherwise unneeded. This does not touch any files > that will normally require merging, which is often the main complication.= I > am unsure whether it will require a merge of the modified source files, b= ut > that is easily avoidable renaming /sys/kern/kern_sig.c.orig to overwrite > the patched /sys/kern/kern_sig.c file, returning the sources to their > original condition. > # cp /sys/kern/kern_sig.c.orig /sys/kern/kern_sig.c > > This is not really required, but will assure that, from the perspective o= f > freebsd-update, the system will be entirely unchanged. There is simply no > impact on future updates as there are no changes left. > > > > I have had a hard time with freebsd-update when upgrading 10.0-RELEASE > > -> 10.1-RELEASE: > > > > > https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/segmentation-fault-while-upgrading-fro= m-10-0-release-to-10-1-release.48977/page-2#post-277094 > > and I do not want to get even more trouble letting > > freebsd-update confuse my system with a mixture of GENERIC and custom > > kernels ending in a situation where none of them is able to boot. > > > > I have learned that I can advice freebsd-update to not update my kernel > > but am still confused whether it is the version under /boot/GENERIC or > > the one under /boot/kernel. And I would like to know how to tell > > FreeBSD how to boot a certain kernel. All I know so far is that if a > > kernel fails to boot you have to boot into recovery and move kernel.old > > to kernel. Is there a boot menu available with the FreeBSD boot loader > > which would simplify life a lot? > > > > The running kernel is in boot/kernel. /boot/GENERIC is not present unless > you create it and, when present, it is used as the kernel which > frebsd-update will patch in the upgrade phase and then install in the > install phase. Actually, the Handbook recommends always keeping a copy of > the GENERIC kernel as /boot/GENERIC. There is no reason not to allow > freebsd-update to update the kernel as it will use /boot/GENERIC and igno= re > the running /boot/kernel/kernel. > Should /boot/GENERIC be a directory containing the contents of the default RELEASE kernel (i.e., a copy of /boot/kernel, including /boot/kernel/kernel, modules, and symbols) OR the actual kernel file itself (i.e., a copy of /boot/kernel/kernel)? > The only issue is a freebsd-update security patch prior to the release of > 10.2 that updates the kernel. To this date there have been none, but it i= s > certainly a possibility. If that should happen, the kernel will no longer > have these patches and you will need to re-apply them, following the same > instructions. Once 10.2 is released, the patches will no longer be needed= . > > > > Furthermore, installing a custom kernel influcences a subsequent build > > world process in a way that I do not yet fully understand. > > > > This is not really a "custom kernel" as it is usually meant. That usually > implies changes to the kernel config file, not patches to the kernel. It > gets a bit more complex if the patches touch code used in any kernel > modules. If that is the case, the process would involve a couple more > steps, but this patch does not do any such things. This is a very simple > case. > > > > > If all above is clarified I could go the way of using a custom kernel. > > But to be honest: I would do it only, because I have just one > > FreeBSD server to mannage this way. The other FreeBSD based servers > > have FreeNAS and pfSense and are managed differently. But if I was an > > administrator with several FreeBSD servers, this would not be a way to > > go. > > > > Actually, dealing with multiple systems would be very little more complex > as, once you have the new kernel built, you simply can copy it to > /boot/kernel/kernel on all other systems. Also copy /boot/GENERIC so that > the next freebsd-update will not be impacted. In any case, you won't need > to worry about this. > > I will agree that, should you not feel comfortable with doing this, you > should not, but it is a very simple case and is a good way to learn about= a > few of the commonly used tools that a system admin may run into on > occasion. I would strongly suggest that you also read the section of the > Handbook that deals with freebsd-update as it may clarify some issues > better than I have. It is at > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgra= ding-freebsdupdate.html > . > It does talk about /boot/GENERIC, which the man page fails to cover. > -- > Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 21:13:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57615D81 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 21:13:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fun.ee.lbl.gov (fun.ee.lbl.gov [IPv6:2620:83:8000:102::ca]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "fun.ee.lbl.gov", Issuer "ACS 3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2711F3F0 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 21:13:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hot.ee.lbl.gov (hot.ee.lbl.gov [131.243.2.203]) (authenticated bits=0) by fun.ee.lbl.gov (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t12LDnqJ020513 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 13:13:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54CFE88D.8000607@ee.lbl.gov> Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 13:13:49 -0800 From: Craig Leres User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Bug 197107] [MAINTAINER] security/bro, security/broccoli: Update to 2.3.2 (includes two CVE fixes) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 21:13:52 -0000 I posted a PR to update security/bro and security/broccoli last week: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197107 But nothing has really happened since then. I'm not entirely sure I understand how maintainer updates work these days; what am I doing wrong? Craig From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 21:17:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86C70E0 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 21:17:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39E94666 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 21:17:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YIONQ-000G2h-FJ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 22:17:48 +0100 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 22:17:48 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Craig Leres Subject: Re: [Bug 197107] [MAINTAINER] security/bro, security/broccoli: Update to 2.3.2 (includes two CVE fixes) Message-ID: <20150202211748.GJ44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <54CFE88D.8000607@ee.lbl.gov> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54CFE88D.8000607@ee.lbl.gov> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 21:17:50 -0000 Hi! > I posted a PR to update security/bro and security/broccoli last week: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197107 > > But nothing has really happened since then. I'm not entirely sure I > understand how maintainer updates work these days; what am I doing wrong? Nothing, it's just that committers are busy 8-( -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 22:29:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F26B51E for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 22:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C291DB2 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 22:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YIPUP-000G92-TD; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 23:29:05 +0100 Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 23:29:05 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Craig Leres , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Bug 197107] [MAINTAINER] security/bro, security/broccoli: Update to 2.3.2 (includes two CVE fixes) Message-ID: <20150202222905.GK44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <54CFE88D.8000607@ee.lbl.gov> <20150202211748.GJ44537@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150202211748.GJ44537@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 22:29:05 -0000 Hi! > > I posted a PR to update security/bro and security/broccoli last week: > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197107 > > > > But nothing has really happened since then. I'm not entirely sure I > > understand how maintainer updates work these days; what am I doing wrong? > > Nothing, it's just that committers are busy 8-( It's updated now. The CPE value and stuff would be cool 8-) -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 23:33:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D47E832 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 23:33:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x234.google.com (mail-ig0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2EA0774 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 23:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f180.google.com with SMTP id b16so20658072igk.1 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 15:33:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=W2ryQk/+DWNpscGzTYCAVvc4pDJjKCZdWNstI3qTjEI=; b=iD4U38wesLm7iouoI6+PfLLiYeja7LRimqpOGXNlpo9l/1SAlSeMSk9czOMGIKySNE Sk4NjPjKPC67sikiHMsDVo/EpuGikTThweNi7Sg81VkvwIRGLmRq8Poiyxy4QmPFEMbz 76FcI0Hj96lbQgpZLO6XkcIkmEcD1ylLrVaOZTIY+v8nENr9kPwow8JrjdmMlzPWsro1 snRKkYN6lH4YOsdW5JGDScrQZFiCCQpaeahk1bs5w7ug/w0ENgny65nJvnV6KwnK4rDW Zr8lqeVpPnHLVKoz7nOxbPmWhZKRoeUr/UA1ujA4uvvrY0NtSGDEdBf/vPcUUa7673Ry /9gg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.70.89.225 with SMTP id br1mr33353194pdb.8.1422919985205; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 15:33:05 -0800 (PST) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.67.22.231 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 15:33:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20150126152433.52f07277f377f9396b65c9a8@mimar.rs> <20150127.002919.335530336.yasu@utahime.org> <20150126163934.32f199d43d86a70b00dd7e4a@mimar.rs> <20150127.010539.230444205.yasu@utahime.org> <54C6695E.6010704@freebsd.org> <20150126212514.56c8f0866f1d63bb98089dd0@mimar.rs> <20150126235655.5d371915@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> <20150127035200.GF44537@home.opsec.eu> <54C73A0E.8050501@FreeBSD.org> <20150127115151.afeb1ee969a562e8f42e300c@mimar.rs> <20150128155846.76d77a18@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 15:33:04 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: yqovHm5bxKJ2BFc1BLT8WNMDs-M Message-ID: Subject: Re: www/squid does not shutdown via rc From: Kevin Oberman To: Nick Rogers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML , "Dr. Peter Voigt" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 23:33:06 -0000 On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Nick Rogers wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:51 PM, Kevin Oberman > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: >> >> > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:51:51 +0100 >> > Marko Cupa=C4=87 wrote: >> > >> > > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:11:10 +0000 >> > > Matthew Seaman wrote: >> > > >> > > > On 2015/01/27 03:52, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> > > > > Doesn't installing a custom kernel break freebsd-update ? >> > > > >> > > > No. freebsd-update has always supported using a custom kernel. I= t >> > > > helps if you name your kernel something other than GENERIC, which >> > > > you do by creating a modofoed kernel config file >> > > > in /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf (or i386 if that's your architecture): >> > > > eg. >> > > > >> > > > % cat FOO >> > > > include GENERIC >> > > > >> > > > ident FOO >> > > > >> > > > and then add: >> > > > >> > > > KERNCONF=3D FOO >> > > > >> > > > to /etc/make.conf >> > > > >> > > > You should also edit /etc/freebsd-update.conf and change the >> > > > 'Components' line to remove 'kernel' from the list. >> > > > >> > > > None of this is absolutely necessary, but it will help you avoid >> > > > accidentally ending up with the generic kernel. >> > > > >> > > > In any case, what you will need to do is rebuild your kernel and >> > > > reinstall it any time freebsd-update touches the kernel. You can >> > > > use freebsd-update to maintain the kernel sources, which will pull >> > > > in the needed updates to the kernel sources. >> > > >> > > The timing for this is really unfortunate for me, because I have jus= t >> > > re-installed my FreeBSD fleet of some 20 virtual servers without >> > > sources included, and I just introduced "binary only" policy (ok I d= o >> > > build my own ports on one server in poudriere, but all other servers >> > > use packages). >> > > >> > > I guess theoretically it is possible to make "kernel build server" >> > > which will build custom kernel for distribution to other servers. I >> > > am just not sure how will RELEASE userland tolerate STABLE kernel. >> > > >> > > Does this sound reasonable? Any tips? >> > > >> > > Thank you in advance, >> > >> > Thanks to all who contributed to this thread. >> > >> >> Sorry for the late response. I've had guests for hte past few days and >> simply have not had time to properly address your concerns. >> >> While most of these concerns are not an issue, exactly why gets a bit mo= re >> complex. And there are some real issues, but this is an exceptionally >> simple case and eliminates most of them. See comments in-line. >> >> > >> > @Kevin: >> > Your outline of kernel patching procedure is helpful and corresponds >> > in most aspects what I have thought so far. I aggree with you that >> > patching, building and installing a custom kernel can be managed. And = I >> > am sure that I can do it. >> > >> > So getting a custom kernel installed is one thing but keeping your >> > system in a manageable way is another. Kurt and Mattew pointed out tha= t >> > you want to keep freebsd-update working in a reliable way and this >> > obviously needs some manual interaction. Information about it is >> > not too easily gathered and answers given here still leave some >> > question open to me. >> > >> >> It does, but very little. In general, freebsd-update is a binary update >> tool. While it does update sources, if they are present, it makes no use >> of >> those sources. >> >> My instructions provided for saving the GENERIC kernel where >> freebsd-update >> will use it instead of the running kernel. /boot/GENERIC is used only be >> freebsd-update. It is otherwise unneeded. This does not touch any files >> that will normally require merging, which is often the main complication= . >> I >> am unsure whether it will require a merge of the modified source files, >> but >> that is easily avoidable renaming /sys/kern/kern_sig.c.orig to overwrite >> the patched /sys/kern/kern_sig.c file, returning the sources to their >> original condition. >> # cp /sys/kern/kern_sig.c.orig /sys/kern/kern_sig.c >> >> This is not really required, but will assure that, from the perspective = of >> freebsd-update, the system will be entirely unchanged. There is simply n= o >> impact on future updates as there are no changes left. >> >> >> > I have had a hard time with freebsd-update when upgrading 10.0-RELEASE >> > -> 10.1-RELEASE: >> > >> > >> https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/segmentation-fault-while-upgrading-fr= om-10-0-release-to-10-1-release.48977/page-2#post-277094 >> > and I do not want to get even more trouble letting >> > freebsd-update confuse my system with a mixture of GENERIC and custom >> > kernels ending in a situation where none of them is able to boot. >> > >> > I have learned that I can advice freebsd-update to not update my kerne= l >> > but am still confused whether it is the version under /boot/GENERIC or >> > the one under /boot/kernel. And I would like to know how to tell >> > FreeBSD how to boot a certain kernel. All I know so far is that if a >> > kernel fails to boot you have to boot into recovery and move kernel.ol= d >> > to kernel. Is there a boot menu available with the FreeBSD boot loader >> > which would simplify life a lot? >> > >> >> The running kernel is in boot/kernel. /boot/GENERIC is not present unles= s >> you create it and, when present, it is used as the kernel which >> frebsd-update will patch in the upgrade phase and then install in the >> install phase. Actually, the Handbook recommends always keeping a copy o= f >> the GENERIC kernel as /boot/GENERIC. There is no reason not to allow >> freebsd-update to update the kernel as it will use /boot/GENERIC and >> ignore >> the running /boot/kernel/kernel. >> > > Should /boot/GENERIC be a directory containing the contents of the defaul= t > RELEASE kernel (i.e., a copy of /boot/kernel, including > /boot/kernel/kernel, modules, and symbols) OR the actual kernel file itse= lf > (i.e., a copy of /boot/kernel/kernel)? > It should be the kernel file, itself. Copy /boot/kernel/kernel to /boot/GENERIC. If you have a modified kernel you can grab the release kernel from a memstick or other distro. I think the Handbook covers it. I really recommend reading the freebsd-update section before messing with this stuff. It's not terribly long, but provides more detailed information on how to use it than the man page which is more technical and rather terse= . Note that this allows freebsd-update to deal with custom kernels, but not code mods to things that go into modules. -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 2 23:49:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 002ECBD1 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 23:49:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x235.google.com (mail-qc0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFAAD8A1 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 23:49:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f181.google.com with SMTP id l6so32876055qcy.12 for ; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 15:49:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=H1jo646JIJtR0Ttdr1249jH7h27kiIDlOh08Xwxzgc8=; b=F4x5NG9v5F0WI4f4KkNueZzFKev8JdG22xU2fMdgbqnxWtF8GTEECxCh3A5KHpKVrA gOdPg61+pSkIt5UDgOjwSSrzGa0jKtrUHdktVfVMvAoqdwhFN5CUpSO0mmY6osuNczXM ZRxMBa+WKrspqC97P/BOR5efXfuuOIB862ZU6EhMiKUHIJ3NXVdJpbS6PjO4MEyx+z5p B7gEDOLLWXhRMpP8sLF1imJamxJ5gqUIkcHQBh2W6KX6+sCQfThE5/mKsrGhExhKYjtC 4KEsdo1PlGdGVOz9sSSMfvRYZPufoRYUFNKoofpkxAqkw624nqUENmcTV/Ai5PVkcCgy hbow== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.7.197 with SMTP id e5mr47739217qae.64.1422920940896; Mon, 02 Feb 2015 15:49:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.140.16.203 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 15:49:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:49:00 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: lang/clisp From: Wesley Ellis To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2015 23:49:02 -0000 I would like to restore the lang/clisp port, and maintain it if I can. The problem I run into is when I try to follow the directions here: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/committers-guide/ports.html#idp59657552 My connection was being closed on the svn cp 'svn+ssh://...' so I went to the svn via browser to see why. Turns out the lang/clisp is not there. So, how do I re-add this port? Thanks, Wes From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 01:11:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 901E92C7 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 01:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay.ox.registrar-servers.com (relay.ox.registrar-servers.com [199.188.203.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.registrar-servers.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 298217C for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 01:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20972 invoked by uid 89); 3 Feb 2015 01:11:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO imap2-3.ox.privateemail.com) (192.64.116.208) by relay.ox.registrar-servers.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 3 Feb 2015 01:11:34 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FEC8C0082 for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 20:11:27 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap2.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id vnHXujCvXJEW for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 20:11:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from etsiit (unknown [77.229.99.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E0778C007D for ; Mon, 2 Feb 2015 20:11:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <1422925874.6165.6.camel@fbsd.es> Subject: Re: lang/clisp From: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 02:11:14 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10 (3.12.10-1.fc21) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 01:11:37 -0000 Hi, To re-add a deleted port do the following: E.g. lang/clisp # mkdir svn-ports # svn checkout svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head svn-ports # cd svn-port/lang && svn cp svn://svn.freebsd/org/ports/head/lang/clisp/@{2014-07-01} clisp Regards, -- Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 08:22:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F892A01 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 08:22:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.mimar.rs (smtp.mimar.rs [193.53.106.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DF1967A for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 08:22:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vscan.mimar.rs (vscan.mimar.rs [193.53.106.134]) by smtp.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E7E898E2; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:22:09 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mimar.rs; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:subject:from :from:date:date:received:received; s=mimar-0901; t=1422951726; x=1424766127; bh=JFJnXvPSmgAJT+yDuFpLadnxEL4ubHD6E4QBSmNjOYU=; b= 0qYBfAmvS/hFyWYqQ7SnFR+n6gwjHc6nTx/lTv0n5czRkogLYOs2Ea3bKWsq5HQ0 PQjkVeBeJ0P2BRkEXSbCgXsKZM38/jTuKi+7sQ+Wx5PNOM6pAIWfXG8nRLhpv0fN uCVj/E9WS76kvk/am/zVCo6cHci5zWNyv1et5Lejp9c= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mimar.rs Received: from smtp.mimar.rs ([193.53.106.135]) by vscan.mimar.rs (vscan.mimar.rs [193.53.106.134]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 5yXJgUPbXkF1; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:22:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from efreet.mimar.rs (nat.kappastar.com [193.53.106.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marko.cupac@mimar.rs) by smtp.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 11CD489477; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:22:06 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:22:05 +0100 From: Marko =?UTF-8?B?Q3VwYcSH?= To: Kurt Jaeger Subject: Re: mail/dovecot2: who calls doveconf upon boot? Message-ID: <20150203092205.64543f00@efreet.mimar.rs> In-Reply-To: <20150202164847.GH44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150202164301.29d6d14b@efreet.mimar.rs> <20150202160520.GB79227@over-yonder.net> <20150202164847.GH44537@home.opsec.eu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 08:22:12 -0000 On Mon, 2 Feb 2015 17:48:47 +0100 Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! >=20 > > > My question is: Who calls doveconf, and for what purpose? > >=20 > > A quick look at the dovecot.in rc script in the ports tree suggests > > that it's unconditionally running dovecot when it's run try try and > > populate base_dir, whether $dovecot_enable or not. >=20 > I prepared a patch that tries to fix it: >=20 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197275 >=20 > Marko: Can you test wether it works for you ? >=20 Wow, that was fast :) I can confirm there is no error message on dovecot2-2.2.15_3. Thank you, --=20 Marko Cupa=C4=87 https://www.mimar.rs From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 09:48:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6620082E for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 528C7EC7 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t139mbdE003231 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:48:37 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t139mbf8003230; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:48:37 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201502030948.t139mbf8003230@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 09:48:37 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 09:48:37 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ audio/fapg | 0.41 | 0.42 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 11:03:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D337CCCD for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:03:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mes-kc-out-176.messagestream.com (mes-kc-out-176.messagestream.com [46.175.48.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "*.messageexchange.com", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ED7F9A1 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Exch-17.MessageExchange.com ([46.175.48.75]) by mes-kc-out-176.messagestream.com with MailEnable ESMTP; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:00:13 +0000 Received: from CAS11.MessageExchange.com (46.175.48.193) by Exch-17.MessageExchange.com (46.175.48.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.181.6; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:00:14 +0000 Received: from mail.messageexchange.com (46.175.48.60) by Cas11.MessageExchange.com (46.175.48.193) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.181.6; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 11:00:12 +0000 X-Mailer: YahooMailIosMobile/0.0 YahooMailWebService/0.8.203.740 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 12:00:08 +0000 From: Edward Shriver Subject: from Edward Shriver To: rev72alex , ports , rboggs , spitzer news request , highereducation , heyellowyuyp , heyellowyuyp , Edward Shriver MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 11:03:20 -0000 Hi! How are you? Breaking news [1]http://vospitatel-enm.ru/noise.php it works! Edward Shriver [2]Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone References 1. http://vospitatel-enm.ru/noise.php 2. https://overview.mail.yahoo.com/?.src=iOS From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 12:31:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98CD175B for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 12:31:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm15-vm1.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm15-vm1.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 639995FD for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 12:31:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1422966545; bh=fEr3djpEH5Z6HqZ2onLR3zz2sVhPEospnuSy31RUwPs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From:Subject; b=XNDPqVIAyB/vM8jhMfWXsJ7qMRwVwszFnii5f84lBxVp1bYEyC0KvrelUAJ83WTXhCDdIebu/TgiNb3XpVZ95Mm/mEz6q64hb51nbEUEGO3nVBJCfkI/5zeKOVeV8jCLRUvpR6/04+PBIIertzP7xFcSN8nm5lLCM/ktMQ1R7uEFxSa9GnepR+/Md7LHM9/gHjfVXXh26MDFrvBm6qJNRoD7hiRMtSLTLWzNYmq6iU5e6mjcReGWgllde+CfVW8173nG5JwSfop0xskAGRfVAbLs88UK1bMMQDLBjL4wbr9QvBrbVACnwjvxwWkiipjEj4pTuwfLxgDySvkIvVz3Tw== Received: from [216.39.60.166] by nm15.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Feb 2015 12:29:05 -0000 Received: from [98.138.104.97] by tm2.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Feb 2015 12:29:05 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Feb 2015 12:29:04 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 901212.67634.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <901212.67634.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 12:29:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 7QyGb0cVM1mSWaL1bpxVqIWnThQvLoVIFmw5t_M26SKVlez SFjRMSQ1C3.YzwQBCZqxVdYrW7JeXIp4j3s.4boxzuKI9adXfSTmLf6Z.x8B WItmCGj4HAJGnmJETieFv8PueLj68En.KhWXUnikUrQMiC7jZxICa6HRRd1T 9OgZAlJRnMS2Q1_kXuuQLwNetQMRBzthZm3spBsKIBucA8e2ih5UQHZ267Bm Uv3Xouu.He6WoUMreIg3ZUfcVIivwtXmCrGB.mLy1EU5IcGL.EQOO5cty6.T 3LrAT2IR9g.zi56tLIfszBjKTBHXE.Xr45TRWU.0gc6S.iyv1dhYAIJieWJy Sj9zuUtjr_MiFqggEtt4DTjpcIaRPXa5rPcsjGU9CsYqMlFne10h7Xq.Xe2B 9foONhRz5Wm5inj1tNFP9HE2WrKKdAk_jsdKCMvdkaS55uDvF7MsVIOQCP69 Dqp9zQVAC5ZvMkrk5tTxetMCNNS9x8NmiiTmr8KnOn11Syvh0XKrT4pCShoe nd1XjpPwVQEUq.xqZFAnmuzEE4bxyORaJqbl4liiWYUYwuau9eumsDcHjL5c - X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: How to use mkntfs, I get "not a block device" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 12:31:29 -0000 I can't format a partition for NTFS with fusefs-ntfs port, using mkntfs. Error message is root@amelia:~ # mkntfs /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 is not a block device. Refusing to make a filesystem here! This doesn't happen with filesystems supported by the base system (UFS, FAT32). I was able to mount an NTFS partition read-write after "kldload fuse", so I did "kldload fuse" here, but that didn't work for mkntfs. I noticed that typing mount by itself showed the mounted NTFS partition as /dev/fuse, but for mkntfs, I don't have anything mounted. I believe one can only mount an already-existing filesystem, so what to do for mkntfs? As I type this message, something strange has happened: key with apostrophe (unshifted) and double quotes (upshift) has gone dead, don't know if the keyboard (PS/2, dating to July 2001), or if some quirk has happened with this FreeBSD-current amd64 system, will try rebooting into FreeDOS or NetBSD, or even starting X. uname -a shows FreeBSD amelia 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #3 r278021: Mon Feb 2 04:18:13 UTC 2015 root@amelia:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SANDY11NC amd64 I create the apostrophe and double quote by the old trick Alt-039 and Alt-034. If necessary, I have USB keyboard to switch to on reboot. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 14:33:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 842CFC0; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 14:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmailer.gwdg.de (fmailer.gwdg.de [134.76.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 413DB7BB; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 14:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from um-excht-a01.um.gwdg.de ([134.76.11.221] helo=email.gwdg.de) by mailer.gwdg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YIeXc-0002dL-Rw; Tue, 03 Feb 2015 15:33:24 +0100 Received: from pc028.nfv (134.76.242.1) by email.gwdg.de (134.76.9.210) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 15:32:04 +0100 Message-ID: <54D0DBE0.1050605@gwdg.de> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2015 15:32:00 +0100 From: Rainer Hurling User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: graphics/gdal: /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 problem Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Level: - X-Virus-Scanned: (clean) by clamav Cc: sunpoet@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 14:33:34 -0000 For some time now, I get the following message, when I use some of the GDAL tools (graphics/gdal) on FreeBSD HEAD (11.0-CURRENT r278036). For example, if I try: #gdalinfo --version ERROR 1: /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version GCC_4.6.0 required by /usr/local/lib/gcc48/libgfortran.so.3 not found ERROR 1: /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version GCC_4.6.0 required by /usr/local/lib/gcc48/libgfortran.so.3 not found GDAL 1.11.1, released 2014/09/24 Because of this, GDAL is not usable for me with ports like math/saga or graphics/qgis on HEAD. They core dump right after starting them. The port graphics/gdal itself builds and installs fine. Don't know, if this is relevant: On my boxes, devel/libc++ is installed by other ports. Obviously, there is something odd between clang (base) and gcc (ports). Is this a known problem? Thanks for any help. Regards, Rainer Hurling From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 22:33:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9599E794 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 22:33:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2793B9A8 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 22:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp118-210-222-217.lns20.adl6.internode.on.net (HELO midget.dons.net.au) ([118.210.222.217]) by ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2015 09:03:20 +1030 Received: from auxxoconnd1m1.dons.net.au (AUXXOCONND1M1.dons.net.au [10.0.2.104]) (authenticated bits=0) by midget.dons.net.au (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t13MXBpQ061874 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:03:18 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from darius@dons.net.au) Subject: Re: How to use mkntfs, I get "not a block device" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "O'Connor, Daniel" In-Reply-To: <901212.67634.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:03:11 +1030 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <43567E46-07C9-4067-B9A7-18080B93B64B@dons.net.au> References: <901212.67634.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> To: Thomas Mueller X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) X-Spam-Score: -2.91 () ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 on 10.0.2.1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 22:33:29 -0000 > On 3 Feb 2015, at 22:59, Thomas Mueller = wrote: >=20 > I can't format a partition for NTFS with fusefs-ntfs port, using = mkntfs. >=20 > Error message is >=20 > root@amelia:~ # mkntfs /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 = =20 > /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 is not a block device. = =20 > Refusing to make a filesystem here! =20 The port should really patch this out (IMO) - it doesn't make sense on = FreeBSD since it doesn't _have_ block devices. If you pass it the -F flag it should let your format the disk. -- Daniel O'Connor "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 3 22:51:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF38CE45 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 22:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82BD7B82 for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2015 22:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp118-210-222-217.lns20.adl6.internode.on.net (HELO midget.dons.net.au) ([118.210.222.217]) by ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 04 Feb 2015 09:21:44 +1030 Received: from auxxoconnd1m1.dons.net.au (AUXXOCONND1M1.dons.net.au [10.0.2.104]) (authenticated bits=0) by midget.dons.net.au (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t13Mpb09092118 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:21:42 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from darius@dons.net.au) Subject: Re: How to use mkntfs, I get "not a block device" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "O'Connor, Daniel" In-Reply-To: <43567E46-07C9-4067-B9A7-18080B93B64B@dons.net.au> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:21:36 +1030 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <134D33C1-973F-46E8-AC09-29CAF8DB3A99@dons.net.au> References: <901212.67634.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <43567E46-07C9-4067-B9A7-18080B93B64B@dons.net.au> To: Thomas Mueller X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) X-Spam-Score: -2.909 () ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,URIBL_BLOCKED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 on 10.0.2.1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2015 22:51:46 -0000 > On 4 Feb 2015, at 09:03, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: >> On 3 Feb 2015, at 22:59, Thomas Mueller = wrote: >>=20 >> I can't format a partition for NTFS with fusefs-ntfs port, using = mkntfs. >>=20 >> Error message is >>=20 >> root@amelia:~ # mkntfs /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 = =20 >> /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 is not a block device. = =20 >> Refusing to make a filesystem here! =20 >=20 > The port should really patch this out (IMO) - it doesn't make sense on = FreeBSD since it doesn't _have_ block devices. > If you pass it the -F flag it should let your format the disk. I filed https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197301 which = fixes it. -- Daniel O'Connor "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 4 06:10:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C697EBB for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 06:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm18-vm9.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm18-vm9.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.62.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FE45DD1 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 06:10:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1423029811; bh=NBWEVH6xYeRv1ytB3V4XWs3l9kPwQI9uSrtxWq5EWos=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:From:Subject; b=Mq/0veJmyhlyE7aKCd+NUXv172hG8N7ayS6qifgWDLGu3ttfowcUnUI29R0my6pi9paqGmjCSfFmhjuUGTOAWzJFV244QPvpTEukhgdkyptMYLnAzhy+4aGywCt6x3bP/QSP2yQxcpyf2u7DEvbNFPFWNS//QKCVXsHQSmsDSFLPG8MA/pGb3RGd8+RvyO7vpzy1q9rViEySAnqFgrH39jcto8QMS7ffWuzd8jG9Zda+qFdWHg9KCM4MWoh5PlkAkKtnfR2jSZ8P7jiGqn+bInz40gujb6IZdm7d6PyQXVhQfdfh/xkn+dW82OCSsHZ8Z46r86iqARqPzU09Ij18ow== Received: from [216.39.60.171] by nm18.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Feb 2015 06:03:31 -0000 Received: from [98.138.104.96] by tm7.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Feb 2015 06:03:31 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp116.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Feb 2015 06:03:31 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 529722.90705.bm@smtp116.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <529722.90705.bm@smtp116.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 06:03:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 7P9jb7UVM1kbhzvQbEJZYmeOeyw577uPOM31d_E2MLFG0N_ qDq6TlntNWgDi52GU_oEX.DYk31hwrN_ZmFBT9OTlPTwRszdZ5fuqEfE0Tic OeOXIH1QtTFOfWQPpfNKZlHcouZaoUxRVCtkVuAWi71YUp1es_HCuqupsEG4 4WnxtzqN49pxOclKgnBvh_tQgaQdjbIjwdPeHP6ZZft4rw2jaCxsxlgZ2nr6 I96YqTqTBCd1jGUpyANvoxGPOxHgDQQjlb60nKXjOfT.ppmgzKXCFVb1RG3Q 2qf0EptDNVTNIRlrhn6j46dMzlUIrPdraGxgIQrfkbCYDf052xsVOBzVonbm m_VtV1g0pwCaEbCemgLDgehu4nKovX9ZLCG17jvQUDfThRLMRslE4gpKjJqF fQjEWJL6hR2C3LI_aAmTtSIItuchZREuTT8Csd0rq5xkkTgMyljmv28MOExQ EON2KdKzTcpgzoWHzKQ5.58bgXEISo9FV0175Uk6oG7...1VY7bhEyYbsz0j J4VY3gui8hnYHnA4liYg8wQFBX011_7toxAYBeQG_w9kwOHhU2EeQMKkjo0a nbbnd7XXtBR9RCA09HIXak1xjIV6NkTibtoLYXTi_a1q5LgkWQC12wxy8Gok gBojIzL.xzzU- X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Missing dependency readline in devel/libtool, wrong libreadline.so version Cc: johans@freebsd.org, autotools@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 06:10:02 -0000 Trying to update devel/libtool, I get /usr/local/bin/libtoolize with 0 bytes. There is a message Making install in . /bin/mkdir -p '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/bin' install -o root -g wheel -m 555 libtool '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/bin' GREP='/usr/bin/grep' SED='/usr/bin/sed' './build-aux/inline-source' libtoolize > '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/bin/libtoolize' Shared object "libreadline.so.8" not found, required by "gawk" I cd'ed to /usr/local/lib, and ln -s libreadline.so.6 libreadline.so.8 I read on freebsd-ports emailing list that such a kludge is dubious, but figured there was no choice. and then re-portmastered devel/libtool, and got /usr/local/bin/libtoolize with 129197 bytes, now hope this is the correct one and will work for things that depend on libtoolize. It looks like devel/readline, maybe also lang/gawk, should be listed as a dependency for libtool. I portmastered multimedia/libva apparently successfully, one port that was snagged by the zero-byte /usr/local/bin/libtoolize. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 4 09:49:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2304BC7 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE157882 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:49:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t149nMcd084698 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:49:22 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t149nMxx084697; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:49:22 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201502040949.t149nMxx084697@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:49:22 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 09:49:22 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/bglibs | 1.106 | 2.02 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/rubygem-hashie | 3.2.0 | 3.4.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net/pen | 0.25.1 | 0.26.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 4 10:01:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 272ACD62 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 10:01:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm11-vm5.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm11-vm5.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.114.228]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5897988 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 10:01:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1423043918; bh=vCX6KRqFQB8XVVtXOb9hfYveuGRjEmC1vhtKpSSD8kk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=H1R4nSg3WOF5yVJM/8X9GB649QtQl/DANaBXOatEyE81djjTFhx+yqceDUzPoGXbYJL9JEQDiXacGcETNr/gwO1jAWhWvc2TIHoL7drKV8YknYjyAMEQTfTmePPnxZZ+z/naGwF0BfCGk9QtdkUjsxs441yKEAATPLRuAC86lluYSNSyoLs2/NDPHaJ0G/69+7Vc7rUoIdHb9QLz0j/Mo9wdu4fdfQ26wQ6rLimhZwyIEqnMr8YJrhWiuWLqh3OLjbvw1GIYR/v0tdbW/jwQ1aOAgof8ycBrW33BbS7xiRXZV/wgBJM9B5xZSxrev10E4N9Ut5qFPl8NPsrd2iJbbQ== Received: from [66.196.81.161] by nm11.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Feb 2015 09:58:38 -0000 Received: from [98.138.104.97] by tm7.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Feb 2015 09:58:38 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 04 Feb 2015 09:58:38 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 666687.83990.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <666687.83990.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:58:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: SeRNgL0VM1keF17DrBEW1uLNllHnW3S67dAYDdEX9W6F4zq W7IZqIhmtnaUU823mUhnG8ci2W74mPOD3eZEkxLM000Vst3dDOEFdz6mJpnE 5rGgMV.0fH9JSCPB2prDVwEGbsxcKEqOhYY6_e.9Jxl_MmwTeDRM2jaRA3Gv Jq3FlhiDEsTosJ917oavaEpVA9zSNR7Is_StHtrF59EeFV9XXvZbJxF8Os.T 80HeQWqUDTuh5yT2HXH0RWATTA4kpmRgKVu5AgKPkEYpc99tgWWuy843U9JD 2.8cNZeT19a9tKruOKNf5vMfjH3ThdgptmpJsN_PtlcoGn7mYYlGD9PlMBzB G7WVaD2EYDmmy1lr7jmK3v4mIZiGBxqwVuKMUqGCuY_wFujBXLcBSha_1naM Wysoq3W1Q5ZDJydDNkFY82PamRVwIp9dneBy4vSq6HNmRco5CO.IC8jmNhIR MXRhKLlPeIIkEg3tWcHbehV7QqwkpLGkWXYx62PK3AJQtYRdBw8CWkDWJfJB o23ikWs7ybKLgKMyhBHNeIxizuYGUjlQUwj9ok6xiTUCzJUvx_5FIZO8yaPt LolZ9COIXdZshuS5U7Ut4L9LTplSw2AdDZE8ozN0YUqElPYw84rUyBZ4pzDE W1czKkdIbxvaKzMVDmSmPp6eXWNqgKxxUww-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to use mkntfs, I get "not a block device" References: <901212.67634.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <43567E46-07C9-4067-B9A7-18080B93B64B@dons.net.au> <134D33C1-973F-46E8-AC09-29CAF8DB3A99@dons.net.au> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 10:01:03 -0000 > On 4 Feb 2015, at 09:03, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: >> On 3 Feb 2015, at 22:59, Thomas Mueller wrote: >> I can't format a partition for NTFS with fusefs-ntfs port, using mkntfs. >> Error message is >> root@amelia:~ # mkntfs /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 >> /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 is not a block device. >> Refusing to make a filesystem here! > The port should really patch this out (IMO) - it doesn't make sense on FreeBSD since it doesn't _have_ block devices. > If you pass it the -F flag it should let your format the disk. > I filed https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197301 which fixes it. > Daniel O'Connor Should I wait for the bug fix to show in sysutils/fusefs-ntfs, or should I just do mkntfs -F /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 ? after kldload fuse . I thought I'd seen error messages referring to block devices, or "not a block device" in FreeBSD and NetBSD before. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 4 11:51:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F0B7139 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:51:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT004-OMC3S22.hotmail.com (snt004-omc3s22.hotmail.com [65.55.90.161]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E21E18E7 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT406-EAS33 ([65.55.90.136]) by SNT004-OMC3S22.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Wed, 4 Feb 2015 03:50:02 -0800 X-TMN: [1UWmrGJOxxar7j3YyXmc1UXp8+nQ9LAGCV82I8BSDJ8=] X-Originating-Email: [sumithananth@outlook.com] Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Sumitha Anantharaman To: "=?utf-8?Q?ports@FreeBSD.org?=" Subject: =?utf-8?Q?download_offline_enable_freesoftware_download?= Importance: Normal Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 10:38:14 +0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Feb 2015 11:50:02.0389 (UTC) FILETIME=[B5C5AC50:01D04070] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "=?utf-8?Q?ports@freeBSD.org?=" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 11:51:15 -0000 DQoNCg0KDQpTZW50IGZyb20gV2luZG93cyBNYWls From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 4 17:45:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EB836CB for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:45:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailfilter.dawnsign.com (draco.dawnsign.com [216.70.247.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AAF9ADC for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Draco.dawnsign.com (draco.dawnsign.com [192.168.101.33]) by mailfilter.dawnsign.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA70211513; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:36:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from DRACO.dawnsign.com ([fe80::6062:7fef:2376:a729]) by Draco.dawnsign.com ([fe80::6062:7fef:2376:a729%10]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:36:25 -0800 From: Doug Sampson To: "'masaki@club.kyutech.ac.jp'" Subject: FreeBSD Port: reposado-0.0.20130415 Thread-Topic: FreeBSD Port: reposado-0.0.20130415 Thread-Index: AdBAoRPQUfSB8VPyS/6xOs+FETM2Mg== Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 17:36:23 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.101.149] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "'ports@FreeBSD.org'" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 17:45:06 -0000 Greg Neagle has released an update to reposado (https://github.com/wdas/rep= osado) involving a new option to remove config-data attributes from product= dist files five days ago. When will we see this update in the FreeBSD ports tree? ~Doug From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 4 18:40:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C25270E for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 18:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2880B274 for ; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 18:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YJ4s1-000NkL-Cp; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 19:40:13 +0100 Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 19:40:13 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Doug Sampson Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: reposado-0.0.20130415 Message-ID: <20150204184013.GN44537@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: "'ports@FreeBSD.org'" , "'masaki@club.kyutech.ac.jp'" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 18:40:25 -0000 Hi! > Greg Neagle has released an update to reposado > (https://github.com/wdas/reposado) involving a new option to remove > config-data attributes from product dist files five days ago. > > When will we see this update in the FreeBSD ports tree? There's a PR now, if it's approved, I'll commit it: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197328 -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 4 18:55:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53F16992; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 18:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx1.stack.nl (relay02.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::104]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailhost.stack.nl", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 136365E0; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 18:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from toad.stack.nl (toad.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::135]) by mx1.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2633592D9; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 19:55:15 +0100 (CET) Received: by toad.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 801) id E2BE2730D7; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 19:55:15 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 19:55:15 +0100 From: Johan van Selst To: Thomas Mueller Subject: Re: Missing dependency readline in devel/libtool, wrong libreadline.so version Message-ID: <20150204185515.GA21500@stack.nl> References: <529722.90705.bm@smtp116.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <529722.90705.bm@smtp116.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> OpenPGP: id=31c8d089ddb696c6f3c129c0a9c86c8dd3ae8d3a; preference=signencrypt User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: autotools@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 18:55:19 -0000 --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Thomas, Thomas Mueller wrote: > Trying to update devel/libtool, I get /usr/local/bin/libtoolize with 0 by= tes. > There is a message=20 > Shared object "libreadline.so.8" not found, required by "gawk" [snip] > It looks like devel/readline, maybe also lang/gawk, should be listed > as a dependency for libtool. I think a better solution would be to make lang/gawk use the readline library from base and to make devel/libtool use awk from base. I'll look into this (soon). Regards, Johan --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF4EAREIAAYFAlTSaxMACgkQAEpMHW8nCPQJMwEA0xeICqUO7TfXxQmx1HAGqVAI rQrYb+64bVVdKJ2r9tsA/1I9wIKcojZVivrniN864UDHEhEr9+ceXPRKbsy0o7P2 =GjN6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 4 19:03:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A6F7D1F; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 19:03:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC3146DE; Wed, 4 Feb 2015 19:03:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id fb4so34062151wid.2; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 11:03:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=5riRWJdaWtVrmvSfMMoDTcLOBiM3/f8NTpak/USTYyg=; b=Wbm00zO7iFqg/MKwIwUu2OgBMSCe5UwFv9qBR6tejgP/fDpWB3IHZ6zCoejX6Onu+R mIa38T2ALc4MdasYTD7cJQ4sO9PVCvlj6AWR7M4O2Vh2RndUb3BWR88d4sC37x1df9D3 h7h3u2kwJ9l/w39yE2oeXnf7k18oxMy7QB2NEfaOBzMR6WzO+OXMUIBh9lfJfZwG3luZ 2NvDIrNRsO7TZAAGVoxQ68zdKvuPv5SJdYFvykIHRHictAK9Ia8//YtIMsjotTSuVPUg kh9U/A1yJ6b4Fv7imCOzfozemq0tfpOeYH2C8OWKlDCPWphH2+/7YeM8M5JFpZO/Zgf0 iZYg== X-Received: by 10.180.93.132 with SMTP id cu4mr47951493wib.49.1423076612222; Wed, 04 Feb 2015 11:03:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w16sm30470078wia.15.2015.02.04.11.03.30 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Feb 2015 11:03:31 -0800 (PST) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 20:03:28 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Johan van Selst Subject: Re: Missing dependency readline in devel/libtool, wrong libreadline.so version Message-ID: <20150204190328.GQ11558@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <529722.90705.bm@smtp116.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20150204185515.GA21500@stack.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="K9fy5ol1Oes4Q/ix" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150204185515.GA21500@stack.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: Thomas Mueller , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, autotools@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 19:03:34 -0000 --K9fy5ol1Oes4Q/ix Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 07:55:15PM +0100, Johan van Selst wrote: > Hi Thomas, >=20 > Thomas Mueller wrote: > > Trying to update devel/libtool, I get /usr/local/bin/libtoolize with 0 = bytes. > > There is a message=20 > > Shared object "libreadline.so.8" not found, required by "gawk" > [snip] >=20 > > It looks like devel/readline, maybe also lang/gawk, should be listed > > as a dependency for libtool. >=20 > I think a better solution would be to make lang/gawk use the readline > library from base and to make devel/libtool use awk from base. >=20 > I'll look into this (soon). >=20 >=20 > Regards, > Johan libtool should use config.site which enforce using awk from base. This should not happen. Having the full log of the build may help understanding what happen. Are you cherry-picking your updates or are you using something like portmaster/portupgrade? Best regards, Bapt --K9fy5ol1Oes4Q/ix Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlTSbQAACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzP1ACbBd+tNgj2byqBg0hgwPwwjkym krAAoIO64NCo150H4fymzynNY2KH9yAS =PVTG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --K9fy5ol1Oes4Q/ix-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 03:26:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 577ECACD for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 03:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE9CE881 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 03:26:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp118-210-222-217.lns20.adl6.internode.on.net (HELO midget.dons.net.au) ([118.210.222.217]) by ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2015 13:51:32 +1030 Received: from auxxoconnd1m1.dons.net.au (AUXXOCONND1M1.dons.net.au [10.0.2.104]) (authenticated bits=0) by midget.dons.net.au (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t153LUe1006082 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:51:31 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from darius@dons.net.au) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Subject: Re: How to use mkntfs, I get "not a block device" From: "O'Connor, Daniel" In-Reply-To: <666687.83990.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 13:51:30 +1030 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <901212.67634.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <43567E46-07C9-4067-B9A7-18080B93B64B@dons.net.au> <134D33C1-973F-46E8-AC09-29CAF8DB3A99@dons.net.au> <666687.83990.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> To: Thomas Mueller X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) X-Spam-Score: -2.91 () ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 on 10.0.2.1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 03:26:42 -0000 > On 4 Feb 2015, at 20:28, Thomas Mueller = wrote: >> The port should really patch this out (IMO) - it doesn't make sense = on FreeBSD since it doesn't _have_ block devices. >> If you pass it the -F flag it should let your format the disk. >>=20 > Should I wait for the bug fix to show in sysutils/fusefs-ntfs, or = should I just do > mkntfs -F /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 ?=20 > after kldload fuse . Just use -F. Note that mkntfs is unrelated to fuse - you can use the NTFS tools = without touching FUSE at all - the only time FUSE is involved is when = you mount an NTFS volume. > I thought I'd seen error messages referring to block devices, or "not = a block device" in FreeBSD and NetBSD before. They were removed a while ago :) -- Daniel O'Connor "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 09:42:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B0A1619 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 09:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.unix-experience.fr (195-154-176-227.rev.poneytelecom.eu [195.154.176.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC0CDDE8 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 09:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.unix-experience.fr (unknown [192.168.200.21]) by smtp.unix-experience.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E4282A530 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 09:37:33 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: scanned by unix-experience.fr Received: from smtp.unix-experience.fr ([192.168.200.21]) by smtp.unix-experience.fr (smtp.unix-experience.fr [192.168.200.21]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6qP_h-dWenOY for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 09:37:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unix-experience.fr (repo.unix-experience.fr [192.168.200.30]) by smtp.unix-experience.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 806912A519 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 09:37:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=unix-experience.fr; s=uxselect; t=1423129051; bh=OW3QNNn4+NwF//OrGf6c0HXBcrudVMuHlextzyKffr8=; h=Date:From:Subject:To; b=dKNUk9bZYNrsaGt2lWeGZoPZQz7kGLUiREZKVs6Yb6sgB6hCSzNRr5t/zUFcsE77V g9zujwHpN1/nf8Bt/Jstcy2N6/qcDrMszccTh92lMR8qnkDzdKWh1y1V3f8obbHnrs cCPKB80GCyjaGQp7NaUvWu7hYG+FeYuaC01hQyR4= Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 09:37:31 +0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: RainLoop/1.7.2.220 From: "=?utf-8?B?TG/Dr2MgQmxvdA==?=" Subject: Rainloop update approved To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 09:42:48 -0000 Hi,=0A i approved https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197= 343=0A=0A Can you commit it to ports ?=0A=0A Thanks.=0A=0A Regards,=0A=0A= Lo=C3=AFc Blot,=0A UNIX Systems, Network and Security Engineer=0Ahttp://= www.unix-experience.fr (http://www.unix-experience.fr) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 10:06:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C403CBE for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 10:06:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58CC19F for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 10:06:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t15A6rWr026578 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 10:06:53 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t15A6rAY026577; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 10:06:53 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201502051006.t15A6rAY026577@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 10:06:53 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 10:06:53 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/jasperreports | 5.5.2 | 6.0.2 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 11:33:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6747174 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:33:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm23-vm7.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm23-vm7.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.115.166]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12119BFC for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:33:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1423135630; bh=UdU5kZECeZ9J0WTcjcpPXom6fL7C9idNWEaRjt9tvOs=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=gSZmYl84bIf7vzQU16uj3jpN0Rf1ehBLdt08xqJAK7U3MWvY3esfHer7P+AbQNWx+RkzTmNJBaCIY71Gp1pxkmpQsI+2ssbga1/xqUp2cjG8GFaYfDTBJpCyl1oNQnKVXntzyXBjL6EENEOfuPJphTut5gd78z5PP0T4kOCk+67VAc5S+hijeHhZGBLuPtlpgX4/fhWEfBVWFcuG00JyDPj9FStMjqsEe3i5JTBlIr+teddAXdAzDXJVNqW42g1hWhmk+Ic/x/eyMfP53FUqc9vSUvyrSV+Iko64qXaKSkxzKLf0Ts7dvNZjGYZ8NjHQ0UgXYa+UGzo0OLTdR+k2FQ== Received: from [66.196.81.163] by nm23.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2015 11:27:10 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.242] by tm9.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2015 11:27:10 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2015 11:27:10 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 725275.1901.bm@smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <725275.1901.bm@smtp113.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:27:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: yKuMtYQVM1l7I2giOd94IqDwhmh0lq26rp8PWkwOFhO_OIg YuAhADo6ur5JPmsVRYzerD2IRBA4yN0MbXxkPH7u5oY4PJbiy_xyFrKSN7kr URds_DnO9RrMGah9J8.CI.3WNNIgdHr54BwgNfYd9mij8kO_giiGf1vO4FRV aYLfPb376Y.C3dK27pKnIFnghM7ruxudoc7qlxxXiJfXPRyc89nL4I65tl.R _IugUYswEdmLDR87QoMgWRXHx0Ha64rMCfrwmdqqhM5S4bQBLyH8YCFDNiIX BpGBBjk2EWpaSerpnBzJEZ31nqF_JaAlFx8s1k3n2.rd9AZhqhqUn6FRNxYu qaj6jUal.WWS7eva23BWkWlqx4WJbTjyL2kv9SURNTD.g9uLAOIjqvQKx4Es a_RLeMsX6rezEy57UW0gq8MJ0s.pIgooh8LRXBW8lk2dfA7ByuHTA6Ho9Inv sK9LI2jDhpTvUBlYEWU9AhDn.okEN2IVS3gUtUK9PqTZ_04mpUhjijWS8arK Swf8SYLoeA.br0XnKZf_n3n_64PVbumWyDSidz9Ee2Q.xWk0msyh8bj._2jW RPqmoqiGlXWgV.TXKZKWES49CthlM_pDGlRqb1BvZfTm3.OVL8_2_NSZiqTx EcHEPK5Ev7aJLXw-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Missing dependency readline in devel/libtool, wrong libreadline.so version References: <529722.90705.bm@smtp116.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20150204185515.GA21500@stack.nl> <20150204190328.GQ11558@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Cc: bapt@freebsd.org, johans@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 11:33:13 -0000 On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 07:55:15PM +0100, Johan van Selst wrote: > Hi Thomas, > Thomas Mueller wrote: > > Trying to update devel/libtool, I get /usr/local/bin/libtoolize with 0 bytes. > > There is a message > > Shared object "libreadline.so.8" not found, required by "gawk" > [snip] > > It looks like devel/readline, maybe also lang/gawk, should be listed > > as a dependency for libtool. > I think a better solution would be to make lang/gawk use the readline > library from base and to make devel/libtool use awk from base. > > I'll look into this (soon). > Regards, > Johan Baptiste Daroussin responded: > libtool should use config.site which enforce using awk from base. > This should not happen. > Having the full log of the build may help understanding what happen. > Are you cherry-picking your updates or are you using something like > portmaster/portupgrade? > Best regards, > Bapt Either use awk from base, or get the correct libreadline.so.* I use portmaster. I will send a separate email, since it's on the other computer, with full /libtool-11amd64.log3 file. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 11:34:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80706126 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:34:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm26-vm5.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm26-vm5.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.115.212]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36F3DC0C for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:34:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1423135653; bh=vBvvYLH21vYyRZrBnfF9OfT/V1cHuQru14lia9qBoRs=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:From:Subject; b=JADHYMRJmi9vB3t8yFgP1lIjNDzIeztj4/cteUviPfzSESRnn3NbHNEJzVzuhBVHKlxISS3nmdJCQnVV9jr5rjHbYdlhYPyQn7LFpoFFUiG7E17xWMY387hthpnAL7pcqaf567tTQPPvi+BvlpOjKwFsfZ2nS644UQkwaUQekOOkDz02bruvm34A9dxFFfeUDgW6MxJOaOsQYvNvn8YfxeWm9FYrFluq1nsy3wwBj0ABHQp2OdPI1jCHue5MuR+oxh/9u7ljUPeRCUX0cwRojFGJanpK0oJNePwR2rQbsyMUWg+kEH8zwp0v+06AEucF1tBRfF9WVNVH2qEM5zmZIA== Received: from [66.196.81.161] by nm26.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2015 11:27:33 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.240] by tm7.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2015 11:27:33 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp111.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2015 11:27:32 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 929039.77151.bm@smtp111.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <929039.77151.bm@smtp111.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 03:27:32 -0800 (PST) X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: t5qHQ_4VM1m1cnvFCGi4j6g3._.Y2Oe4SqVZ2O_q2zot6Qg vegz.0x66uiIBh9Ol4fvPvnxLoKlVhfdeiePq4q850i0_4jK.4s1zdarC6uT JGR0WdW8OrRrvS6PunRhAfm1zPJ9zUEJn3qNLkKMng3isGwlw8yN5tYQrSJm R4L27kHM8c7NUyF.Tbq0z2fPtrevvAWpsSp_SDHsKE0Tht9fQMQ76mSce5ZT 3a_A.HA_5t2bQQaku_UqOFKfZHas33DT6VNfk5UJVGOIRp2oLpbOZNZcf_xh XFpZNOL.nhRor6IgakJ2iQSmlW9ngqwudK0S6DuAQkB_PuFVaRiqLM5shScd BjsKYzSuIeKHI6Pjyj1E7sqya8NGpkoURakhQMoGy0_vhXJwaOwRwb6g1uBl EzjbUuLKA_aXFBea_oxeNu_Sui_724NQEwNkItoDdiYt8fqqqraSUFEzU0GC uozRmKtlBBeE8i3hoR5GbGOwl6qkli4FTpWmMI6ZVFgIheJpiJGUkeJhGRJ6 FvX01HnQ4uS7Irt5d7hPiFmxKsjSBYbfHaOJfh4K5Sd.kDesJfCWusStFJtf r.fbacXSEqCb9xJuwV5JgC3Q1DjPnW96nFU3W_XN9m_6IgfIOPjl2XSsBdSH ySP6cpMWh11Ar.51.TPfem8ymvFui001yJ.Bx3TsnKrwW7AcQTTbeQehXxG. Omcqc8HAON.3K_FhtoJt3aR9OAvW0Qs0eCWABDGzZokkBDryZO5DU.zuaBvd xet3ad5LVU6ZqTWpd.iyrHCPQzyHFOaLjGRYHdAiVOWckXb_puQXB4UmQZRI 8JLvMJJn9TWzQWvQIx.ZODaQ4a9FB_JXGepOs9sCJvINT0OXx9eEmaVVUkfd wgBp6HaE7W0p.j7ta69KXx4JIrpTjbwVpc0FoIXYxXH3a9sy7yOXyXufE7h7 3KWNm4JU9_c2UVO3MtatGdnWJYvE8KizYkHD29jKU8WkWmMpN4e2DTqSBMk5 z81O16J8pKiw7_fu9EWuXRWCv X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Missing dependency readline in devel/libtool, wrong libreadline.so version Cc: johans@freebsd.org, bapt@freebsd.org, autotools@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 11:34:04 -0000 Trying to update devel/libtool, I get /usr/local/bin/libtoolize with 0 bytes. There is a message Making install in . /bin/mkdir -p '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/bin' install -o root -g wheel -m 555 libtool '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/bin' GREP='/usr/bin/grep' SED='/usr/bin/sed' './build-aux/inline-source' libtoolize > '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/bin/libtoolize' Shared object "libreadline.so.8" not found, required by "gawk" Here is the requested full build log with the error: ]0;portmaster: libtool-2.4.2.418 ===>>> Currently installed version: libtool-2.4.2.418 ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/devel/libtool ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports ===>>> Launching 'make checksum' for devel/libtool in background ===>>> Gathering dependency list for devel/libtool from ports ===>>> Initial dependency check complete for devel/libtool ]0;portmaster: libtool-2.4.2.418 ===>>> Starting build for devel/libtool <<<=== ===>>> All dependencies are up to date ===> Cleaning for libtool-2.4.5 ===> License GPLv2 accepted by the user ===> libtool-2.4.5 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by libtool-2.4.5 for building ===> Extracting for libtool-2.4.5 => SHA256 Checksum OK for libtool-2.4.5.tar.xz. ===> Patching for libtool-2.4.5 ===> libtool-2.4.5 depends on executable: gm4 - found ===> libtool-2.4.5 depends on executable: makeinfo - found ===> Configuring for libtool-2.4.5 configure: loading site script /usr/ports/Templates/config.site ## ------------------------- ## ## Configuring libtool 2.4.5 ## ## ------------------------- ## checking for GNU M4 that supports accurate traces... /usr/local/bin/gm4 checking whether /usr/local/bin/gm4 accepts --gnu... yes checking how m4 supports trace files... --debugfile checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... (cached) /bin/mkdir -p checking for gawk... (cached) /usr/bin/awk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether make supports nested variables... yes checking whether make supports nested variables... (cached) yes checking build system type... amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0 checking host system type... amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0 configure: autobuild project... GNU Libtool configure: autobuild revision... 2.4.5 configure: autobuild hostname... amelia configure: autobuild mode... default configure: autobuild timestamp... 20150204T025723Z checking for gcc... cc checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking for suffix of executables... checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking whether cc understands -c and -o together... yes checking for style of include used by make... GNU checking dependency style of cc... gcc3 checking how to run the C preprocessor... cpp checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... (cached) /usr/bin/grep checking for egrep... (cached) /usr/bin/egrep checking for Minix Amsterdam compiler... no checking for ar... ar checking for ranlib... ranlib checking how to run the C preprocessor... cpp checking how to print strings... printf checking for a sed that does not truncate output... (cached) /usr/bin/sed checking for fgrep... (cached) /usr/bin/fgrep checking for ld used by cc... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking for BSD- or MS-compatible name lister (nm)... /usr/local/bin/nm -B checking the name lister (/usr/local/bin/nm -B) interface... BSD nm checking whether ln -s works... yes checking the maximum length of command line arguments... (cached) 262144 checking how to convert amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0 file names to amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0 format... func_convert_file_noop checking how to convert amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0 file names to toolchain format... func_convert_file_noop checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r checking for objdump... objdump checking how to recognize dependent libraries... pass_all checking for dlltool... no checking how to associate runtime and link libraries... printf %s\n checking for archiver @FILE support... no checking for strip... strip checking for ranlib... (cached) ranlib checking command to parse /usr/local/bin/nm -B output from cc object... ok checking for sysroot... no checking for a working dd... /bin/dd checking how to truncate binary pipes... /bin/dd bs=4096 count=1 checking for mt... mt checking if mt is a manifest tool... no checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes checking for sys/types.h... (cached) yes checking for sys/stat.h... (cached) yes checking for stdlib.h... (cached) yes checking for string.h... (cached) yes checking for memory.h... (cached) yes checking for strings.h... (cached) yes checking for inttypes.h... (cached) yes checking for stdint.h... (cached) yes checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes checking for dlfcn.h... (cached) yes checking for objdir... .libs checking if cc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... yes checking for cc option to produce PIC... -fPIC -DPIC checking if cc PIC flag -fPIC -DPIC works... yes checking if cc static flag -static works... yes checking if cc supports -c -o file.o... yes checking if cc supports -c -o file.o... (cached) yes checking whether the cc linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no checking dynamic linker characteristics... freebsd11.0 ld.so checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking for shl_load... no checking for shl_load in -ldld... no checking for dlopen... (cached) yes checking whether a program can dlopen itself... yes checking whether a statically linked program can dlopen itself... no checking whether stripping libraries is possible... no checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... yes checking what extension is used for runtime loadable modules... .so checking what variable specifies run-time module search path... LD_LIBRARY_PATH checking for the default library search path... /lib /usr/lib checking for library containing dlopen... none required checking for dlerror... yes checking for shl_load... (cached) no checking for shl_load in -ldld... (cached) no checking for dld_link in -ldld... no checking for _ prefix in compiled symbols... no checking whether deplibs are loaded by dlopen... yes checking for argz.h... (cached) no checking for error_t... no checking for argz_add... no checking for argz_append... no checking for argz_count... (cached) no checking for argz_create_sep... no checking for argz_insert... no checking for argz_next... (cached) no checking for argz_stringify... (cached) no checking whether libtool supports -dlopen/-dlpreopen... yes checking for unistd.h... (cached) yes checking for dl.h... (cached) no checking for sys/dl.h... no checking for dld.h... no checking for mach-o/dyld.h... no checking for dirent.h... (cached) yes checking for closedir... (cached) yes checking for opendir... (cached) yes checking for readdir... (cached) yes checking for strlcat... (cached) yes checking for strlcpy... (cached) yes checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler... yes checking whether c++ accepts -g... yes checking dependency style of c++... gcc3 checking how to run the C++ preprocessor... c++ -E checking for ld used by c++... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking whether the c++ linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking for c++ option to produce PIC... -fPIC -DPIC checking if c++ PIC flag -fPIC -DPIC works... yes checking if c++ static flag -static works... yes checking if c++ supports -c -o file.o... yes checking if c++ supports -c -o file.o... (cached) yes checking whether the c++ linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking dynamic linker characteristics... freebsd11.0 ld.so checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking for g77... no checking for xlf... no checking for f77... no checking for frt... no checking for pgf77... no checking for cf77... no checking for fort77... no checking for fl32... no checking for af77... no checking for xlf90... no checking for f90... no checking for pgf90... no checking for pghpf... no checking for epcf90... no checking for gfortran... no checking for g95... no checking for xlf95... no checking for f95... no checking for fort... no checking for ifort... no checking for ifc... no checking for efc... no checking for pgfortran... no checking for pgf95... no checking for lf95... no checking for ftn... no checking for nagfor... no checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran 77 compiler... no checking whether accepts -g... no checking for gfortran... no checking for g95... no checking for xlf95... no checking for f95... no checking for fort... no checking for ifort... no checking for ifc... no checking for efc... no checking for pgfortran... no checking for pgf95... no checking for lf95... no checking for ftn... no checking for nagfor... no checking for xlf90... no checking for f90... no checking for pgf90... no checking for pghpf... no checking for epcf90... no checking for g77... no checking for xlf... no checking for f77... no checking for frt... no checking for pgf77... no checking for cf77... no checking for fort77... no checking for fl32... no checking for af77... no checking whether we are using the GNU Fortran compiler... no checking whether accepts -g... no checking for gccgo... no checking for gcj... no checking for windres... no checking that generated files are newer than configure... done configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating config.h config.status: executing tests/atconfig commands config.status: executing depfiles commands config.status: executing libtool commands ===> Building for libtool-2.4.5 GEN libtoolize GEN libltdl/libltdl/lt__argz.h /usr/bin/make all-recursive Making all in . MAKEINFO ./doc/libtool.info CC libltdl/loaders/dlopen.lo CCLD libltdl/dlopen.la CC libltdl/loaders/libltdl_libltdlc_la-preopen.lo CC libltdl/libltdl_libltdlc_la-lt__alloc.lo CC libltdl/libltdl_libltdlc_la-lt_dlloader.lo CC libltdl/libltdl_libltdlc_la-lt_error.lo CC libltdl/libltdl_libltdlc_la-ltdl.lo CC libltdl/libltdl_libltdlc_la-slist.lo CC libltdl/lt__argz.lo CCLD libltdl/libltdlc.la ===> Staging for libtool-2.4.5 ===> Generating temporary packing list /usr/bin/make install-recursive Making install in . /bin/mkdir -p '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/bin' install -o root -g wheel -m 555 libtool '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/bin' GREP='/usr/bin/grep' SED='/usr/bin/sed' './build-aux/inline-source' libtoolize > '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/bin/libtoolize' Shared object "libreadline.so.8" not found, required by "gawk" rm -rf '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool'/* install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './m4/libtool.m4' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/aclocal/libtool.m4' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './m4/ltargz.m4' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/aclocal/ltargz.m4' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './m4/ltdl.m4' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/aclocal/ltdl.m4' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './m4/ltoptions.m4' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/aclocal/ltoptions.m4' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './m4/ltsugar.m4' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/aclocal/ltsugar.m4' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './m4/ltversion.m4' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/aclocal/ltversion.m4' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './m4/lt~obsolete.m4' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/aclocal/lt~obsolete.m4' install -o root -g wheel -m 555 './build-aux/compile' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/build-aux/compile' install -o root -g wheel -m 555 './build-aux/config.guess' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/build-aux/config.guess' install -o root -g wheel -m 555 './build-aux/config.sub' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/build-aux/config.sub' install -o root -g wheel -m 555 './build-aux/depcomp' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/build-aux/depcomp' install -o root -g wheel -m 555 './build-aux/install-sh' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/build-aux/install-sh' install -o root -g wheel -m 555 './build-aux/missing' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/build-aux/missing' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './build-aux/ltmain.sh' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/build-aux/ltmain.sh' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/COPYING.LIB' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/COPYING.LIB' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/Makefile.am' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/Makefile.am' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/README' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/README' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/configure.ac' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/configure.ac' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/aclocal.m4' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/aclocal.m4' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/Makefile.in' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/Makefile.in' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/config-h.in' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/config-h.in' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/configure' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/configure' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/libltdl/lt__alloc.h' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/libltdl/lt__alloc.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/libltdl/lt__argz_.h' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/libltdl/lt__argz_.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/libltdl/lt__dirent.h' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/libltdl/lt__dirent.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/libltdl/lt__glibc.h' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/libltdl/lt__glibc.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/libltdl/lt__private.h' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/libltdl/lt__private.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/libltdl/lt__strl.h' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/libltdl/lt__strl.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/libltdl/lt_dlloader.h' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/libltdl/lt_dlloader.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/libltdl/lt_error.h' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/libltdl/lt_error.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/libltdl/lt_system.h' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/libltdl/lt_system.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/libltdl/slist.h' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/libltdl/slist.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/loaders/dld_link.c' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/loaders/dld_link.c' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/loaders/dlopen.c' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/loaders/dlopen.c' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/loaders/dyld.c' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/loaders/dyld.c' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/loaders/load_add_on.c' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/loaders/load_add_on.c' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/loaders/loadlibrary.c' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/loaders/loadlibrary.c' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/loaders/preopen.c' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/loaders/preopen.c' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/loaders/shl_load.c' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/loaders/shl_load.c' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/lt__alloc.c' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/lt__alloc.c' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/lt__argz.c' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/lt__argz.c' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/lt__dirent.c' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/lt__dirent.c' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/lt__strl.c' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/lt__strl.c' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/lt_dlloader.c' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/lt_dlloader.c' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/lt_error.c' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/lt_error.c' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/ltdl.c' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/ltdl.c' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/ltdl.h' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/ltdl.h' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/ltdl.mk' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/ltdl.mk' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 './libltdl/slist.c' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/slist.c' chmod a+x '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/share/libtool/configure' /bin/mkdir -p '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/info' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 ./doc/libtool.info '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/info' install-info --info-dir='/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/info' '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/info/libtool.info' /bin/mkdir -p '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/man/man1' install -o root -g wheel -m 0644 ./doc/libtool.1 ./doc/libtoolize.1 '/usr/ports/devel/libtool/work11.amd64/stage/usr/local/man/man1' ====> Compressing man pages (compress-man) ===>>> Creating a backup package for old version libtool-2.4.2.418 Creating package for libtool-2.4.2.418 Updating database digests format... done Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 0 packages in the universe): Installed packages to be REMOVED: libtool-2.4.2.418 The operation will free 2 MiB. [1/1] Deinstalling libtool-2.4.2.418... [1/1] Deleting files for libtool-2.4.2.418... done ===> Installing for libtool-2.4.5 ===> Checking if libtool already installed ===> Registering installation for libtool-2.4.5 as automatic Installing libtool-2.4.5... ===>>> Creating a package for new version libtool-2.4.5 ===>>> Package saved to /usr/packages/All ===>>> Deleting stale distfile: libtool-2.4.2.418.tar.xz ===>>> Upgrade of libtool-2.4.2.418 to libtool-2.4.5 complete Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 11:46:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D032E8C5 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm15-vm10.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm15-vm10.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.115.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B8BCD4D for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:46:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1423136632; bh=QzpTZ981Ck4t50ChHkBESBQwtI/U+xP31DRdGiO6YiQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=BTmaal4bWXB4TIorXUJ454AZ3xAqHr5b+Sv+bDYvdSi/EL+/4kZKnyCOpAM27O7TkJu6W+Ogp1Oxs9Azpfqa2gym7YRIkzrgdodOiBNmZwxKEXRsrIRHEWWuuOvEkdsX91myXahtWcggv/ZbQcr4LGslLLpF6GANk5RcKIHZTdzh40eYC1x4zjTMoFmk0YVY2UC17AYuE2zz4xyCOn2d/DgH4dSN6mottHbmlKa55W1oyjWcRljCUlJmxpHiJaBkyQK5B7PqY/Ks8+ZhfKqCaPO3oq/FMhXnLCwSdIU5MIxtjg/zpqY7v5PZIrmPZRSfd9DbPdVZPTz0EuQaqOCATg== Received: from [66.196.81.164] by nm15.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2015 11:43:52 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.244] by tm10.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2015 11:43:52 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp115.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2015 11:43:52 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 469946.64698.bm@smtp115.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <469946.64698.bm@smtp115.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:43:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: .hXprG8VM1li07iOgpX.UkrFXiifLYukWx90g7y6jvLEs6o ATFZCmAMVe97jf_gus97lNLFf5AKFBXvp5_Bf9Xji4bWutV.cUwcRQSjdmN7 eZbLX3ihnIP5NBTuO4nlxu8PbEk4qOZuZH91p3tERfpzYTu9FPkkPMwZWhmv xI.lezOxMLhyBL_eM39Y46xa_Jx9TFIB4_StV4hc6_1_rzBODXc9GBWCjebF 5TZY08gywUQiMuZURzMJI0k42Q9UztZ7lXHciKSXPSpIQiEWQIhlclE4BKCu mU.Dy0pesjnGMdDMTy8yoJ2gLl4RvvTdOiX5Gr__ep.b9Rp7A9wkMTnb2zbK 9xMGt851oKEuGI9APfuk3dHCAJXs4DlcSPvJqvx0jlDSXV_BoElPjse4gTTy 4LSSoLt1.2VT7jf3b60rdBDgksFF9xjfUniM0.kfjd54IM9SKHQzAzqGeCYE GOA8OAAwMUX8jOLzCE0T_njXpB.ozHGpDVNJVWkAwpYFDXnPD64uhUP2pcBA SQ0OKz.mEFZ7zAOw2eq4rItbEGdhfFs4TKNWIWBva8Wh.mvW37lTYGvXdsdI - X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to use mkntfs, I get "not a block device" References: <901212.67634.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <43567E46-07C9-4067-B9A7-18080B93B64B@dons.net.au> <134D33C1-973F-46E8-AC09-29CAF8DB3A99@dons.net.au> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 11:46:24 -0000 > > On 4 Feb 2015, at 20:28, Thomas Mueller wrote: > >> The port should really patch this out (IMO) - it doesn't make sense on FreeBSD since it doesn't _have_ block devices. > >> If you pass it the -F flag it should let your format the disk. >> > > Should I wait for the bug fix to show in sysutils/fusefs-ntfs, or should I just do > > mkntfs -F /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 ? > > after kldload fuse . > Just use -F. > Note that mkntfs is unrelated to fuse - you can use the NTFS tools without touching FUSE at all - the only time FUSE is involved is when you mount an NTFS volume. > > I thought I'd seen error messages referring to block devices, or "not a block device" in FreeBSD and NetBSD before. > They were removed a while ago :) > Daniel O'Connor I just did with -F, got the message that Windows won't be able to boot from such a device, then get Initializing device with zeroes: 0% (now up to 3% as I type this on other computer. I can wait, really need to go to bed.) I wasn't planning to run MS-Windows, and don't know if there is anything else that could boot from NTFS. Thanks for help! Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 17:47:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35ABFA15 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:47:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5C2DECC for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:47:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YJQWm-0002Ui-N1; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 18:47:44 +0100 Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 18:47:44 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= Blot Subject: Re: Rainloop update approved Message-ID: <20150205174744.GP44537@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 17:47:45 -0000 Hi! > i approved https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197343 > > Can you commit it to ports ? Done. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 19:36:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C2A0663 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 19:36:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm14.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm14.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.62.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28451E0C for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 19:36:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s2048; t=1423164839; bh=pm+bAUYdksHUUbsAOxzqayew9eEH2SwzfInqtmqnaHc=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:From:Subject; b=P6m11kOPFlmv0/yxkxgVFGED3JGpxZ4iTtboQJT4F/EOIhu8TKXZ9v8WnPenHq3fjKXJ6K9zdwJchRKbab2oI3wawwRoMHV44hmrcfHEToYVPNuw5631H/gfJd19vqc23S8di2pyGAnIcXxS9A0JwNJ+SVpZhWbFwqh780B65wpNb9nuES6rCUBOIo8x7oK3ko92LmYdcoYExGWyBuVQlNs5Jbns2FpYYjCaD47CunBVQu6IbGXjgav13IDJkE5Gdyx+43qzscHEtd32zCiRNuKXscN+kPDJyEe7sSVu+DuDY5DFBCCC3piq/uuOye2awcSZSI70pKFs3WUPl+QwBw== Received: from [216.39.60.166] by nm14.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2015 19:33:59 -0000 Received: from [98.138.104.98] by tm2.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2015 19:33:59 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Feb 2015 19:33:58 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 859719.90543.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <859719.90543.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 19:33:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: GqeZMKwVM1llmVKfXh8u9WZvFcry.5OUNuGIbSNf2VtrG13 Fl6bW_5_3O7vKu9X43szoGSSkrwShUZxuWGJlgNEzbgXtXSpBS2gXArwNq40 0VpExBDMeS9gqLpWGx0.ONBE1nZ7lHf7dOyiBPIfNbWo46AaBkJ3YYvIfPGi GzClyr1H8wr6gdWsxlgy45XUtjDCMIDcUj2blEKKetbs2mVBK_YTDaAsL5Yi j7qoeg.v0shOy44CbSANFdPEgWefddJCZAnEAy7FPOBNC7zrl42Mjzas49vd k9.T4U9KKufPiwak6D51U10lnr.esBBn0uhzWEApNwwMEPHhyxcnQnMar2qr X11lv6yfJCAqE3kY1y627SmGpQqkqrilc1fnyyq56vmwCpQa.k6ZiXYh1bIE 3KEhTQMF2Gc2MkeMQ6bfoi_00_1MqQkh0V.eAtuaRNHGErEOo5XA_D9DcdgT YG8qeMxvY7AYJ.QMGfnAdq3xgVPBS5KqXC3E0999.N4c.X.hWjcQtnu.TWjI .Civ9yyxsWgr1W61H5JzwKUwc0elRUpVG3NlbKdHQWvtYDNqNsUV.x1dq X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to use mkntfs, I get "not a block device" Cc: "O'Connor, Daniel" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 19:36:25 -0000 In running mkntfs -F /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 I got (do I need to be concerned?) root@amelia:/usr/ports # mkntfs -F /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 is not a block device. mkntfs forced anyway. The partition start sector was not specified for /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 and it could not be obtained automatically. It has been set to 0. The number of sectors per track was not specified for /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 and it could not be obtained automatically. It has been set to 0. The number of heads was not specified for /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 and it could not be obtained automatically. It has been set to 0. Cluster size has been automatically set to 4096 bytes. To boot from a device, Windows needs the 'partition start sector', the 'sectors per track' and the 'number of heads' to be set. Windows will not be able to boot from this device. Initializing device with zeroes: 0% 100% - Done. Creating NTFS volume structures. mkntfs completed successfully. Have a nice day. root@amelia:/usr/ports # It took many hours, partition size was 500 GB, I let it run while I was in bed. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 20:52:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 186D8D6F for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 20:52:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAB11A2A for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 20:52:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YJTPx-0002tn-HB for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 21:52:53 +0100 Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:52:53 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: pkg and https-based repo with self-signed cert Message-ID: <20150205205253.GQ44537@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 20:52:54 -0000 Hi! How do I get pkg to accept a self-signed cert if the repo is running under https ? Thanks for any hints! -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 20:55:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FE45F4A for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 20:55:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE36CA47 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 20:55:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YJTSB-0002uT-QM for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 21:55:11 +0100 Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:55:11 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg and https-based repo with self-signed cert Message-ID: <20150205205511.GR44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150205205253.GQ44537@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150205205253.GQ44537@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 20:55:12 -0000 Hi! > How do I get pkg to accept a self-signed cert if the repo is running > under https ? > > Thanks for any hints! man 3 fetch says export SSL_NO_VERIFY_PEER=1 should work. Tested, yes, it works. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 20:57:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77D4A19C for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 20:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.grem.de (outcast.grem.de [213.239.217.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE110A70 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 20:57:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26193 invoked by uid 89); 5 Feb 2015 20:57:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.250.192?) (mg@grem.de@88.217.180.225) by mail.grem.de with ESMTPA; 5 Feb 2015 20:57:30 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: pkg and https-based repo with self-signed cert From: Michael Gmelin X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B466) In-Reply-To: <20150205205511.GR44537@home.opsec.eu> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:59:38 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <01995384-5D03-4C8B-B998-83CCC128FF44@grem.de> References: <20150205205253.GQ44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150205205511.GR44537@home.opsec.eu> To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 20:57:39 -0000 > On 05 Feb 2015, at 21:55, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >=20 > Hi! >=20 >> How do I get pkg to accept a self-signed cert if the repo is running >> under https ? >>=20 >> Thanks for any hints! >=20 > man 3 fetch says >=20 > export SSL_NO_VERIFY_PEER=3D1 That will accept *any* cert, not certain if that's what you want (depends on= your use case). You can set environment variables in pkg.conf (PKG_ENV if I remember correct= ly) >=20 > should work. Tested, yes, it works. >=20 > --=20 > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to g= o ! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 21:02:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD78D627 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:02:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.grem.de (outcast.grem.de [213.239.217.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31C09BA5 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:02:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26185 invoked by uid 89); 5 Feb 2015 20:55:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.250.192?) (mg@grem.de@88.217.180.225) by mail.grem.de with ESMTPA; 5 Feb 2015 20:55:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: pkg and https-based repo with self-signed cert From: Michael Gmelin X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B466) In-Reply-To: <20150205205253.GQ44537@home.opsec.eu> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:57:50 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <17BD0577-90A1-4F76-A67B-0E6EF091DEC6@grem.de> References: <20150205205253.GQ44537@home.opsec.eu> To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 21:02:26 -0000 > On 05 Feb 2015, at 21:52, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >=20 > Hi! >=20 > How do I get pkg to accept a self-signed cert if the repo is running > under https ? >=20 > Thanks for any hints! >=20 Hi Kurt, I wrote a blog post about that in 2013, which should still work for the most= part (all patches required for that are in the source tree by now): http://blog.grem.de/sysadmin/Trusted-Package-Distribution-With-pkgng-2013-03= -30.html - Michael > --=20 > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to g= o ! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 21:18:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43B28B83 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF452D17 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:18:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YJToV-0002yT-IF for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 22:18:15 +0100 Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 22:18:15 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: pkg and https-based repo with self-signed cert Message-ID: <20150205211815.GS44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150205205253.GQ44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150205205511.GR44537@home.opsec.eu> <01995384-5D03-4C8B-B998-83CCC128FF44@grem.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01995384-5D03-4C8B-B998-83CCC128FF44@grem.de> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 21:18:15 -0000 Hi! > >> How do I get pkg to accept a self-signed cert if the repo is running > >> under https ? > > man 3 fetch says > > > > export SSL_NO_VERIFY_PEER=1 To be more exact: cd /usr/local/etc/ cp pkg.conf.sample pkg.conf vi pkg.conf ------------- PKG_ENV : { SSL_NO_VERIFY_PEER: 1 } ------------- will do this without the explicit environment variable. > That will accept *any* cert, not certain if that's what you want > (depends on your use case). Well, it's not perfect, but it's good enough for now. > You can set environment variables in pkg.conf (PKG_ENV if I > remember correctly) Yes, that helped. I had to copy the syntax from the pkg.conf.sample with the ALIASes. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 21:39:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CA79A9D for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:39:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5782FA7 for ; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp118-210-197-72.lns20.adl6.internode.on.net (HELO midget.dons.net.au) ([118.210.197.72]) by ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 06 Feb 2015 08:09:24 +1030 Received: from auxxoconnd1m1.dons.net.au (AUXXOCONND1M1.dons.net.au [10.0.2.104]) (authenticated bits=0) by midget.dons.net.au (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t15LdKpu018617 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 6 Feb 2015 08:09:23 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from darius@dons.net.au) Subject: Re: How to use mkntfs, I get "not a block device" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "O'Connor, Daniel" In-Reply-To: <859719.90543.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 08:09:20 +1030 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <859719.90543.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> To: Thomas Mueller X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) X-Spam-Score: -2.91 () ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 on 10.0.2.1 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 21:39:33 -0000 > On 6 Feb 2015, at 06:03, Thomas Mueller = wrote: >=20 > In running=20 > mkntfs -F /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 >=20 > I got (do I need to be concerned?) >=20 > root@amelia:/usr/ports # mkntfs -F /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 > /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 is not a block device. > mkntfs forced anyway. > The partition start sector was not specified for /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 = and it could not be obtained automatically. It has been set to 0. > The number of sectors per track was not specified for = /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 and it could not be obtained automatically. It has = been set to 0. > The number of heads was not specified for /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 and it = could not be obtained automatically. It has been set to 0. > Cluster size has been automatically set to 4096 bytes. > To boot from a device, Windows needs the 'partition start sector', the = 'sectors per track' and the 'number of heads' to be set. > Windows will not be able to boot from this device. > Initializing device with zeroes: 0%=20 > 100% - Done. > Creating NTFS volume structures. > mkntfs completed successfully. Have a nice day. > root@amelia:/usr/ports #=20 So long as you don't want to do boot Windows from it, it should be fine. I imagine the port could be fixed to fetch those but I guess no one has = bothered. > It took many hours, partition size was 500 GB, I let it run while I = was in bed. I forgot - it does a full format (i.e. zeroes every sector) by default - = if you pass -f it will do a quick format instead (see the man page) -- Daniel O'Connor "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 21:55:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3C1A438; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:55:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com (mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B1F23A; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:55:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Trace: 160201872/mk-outboundfilter-1.mail.uk.tiscali.com/PIPEX/$ON_NET_AUTH_ACCEPTED/pipex-temporary-group/81.170.77.10/-4.0/crees@physics.org X-SBRS: -4.0 X-RemoteIP: 81.170.77.10 X-IP-MAIL-FROM: crees@physics.org X-SMTP-AUTH: bayofrum@uwclub.net X-MUA: K-9 Mail for Android X-IP-BHB: Once X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkwHAF3m01RRqk0KPGdsb2JhbABagwZSWYMBsAGPSIV2AoEbRAEBAQEBBgEBAQE4O4QNAQEEIw8BIyMQCxgCAiYCAjkKFAYBDQWIGQMRBAnAG5YyAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSBIYkfgw6BWQEBTweCaC6BEwEEkmiEF4JcgwOCFg+De4IxhgCEEG8BAQEBgQeBNwEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: AkwHAF3m01RRqk0KPGdsb2JhbABagwZSWYMBsAGPSIV2AoEbRAEBAQEBBgEBAQE4O4QNAQEEIw8BIyMQCxgCAiYCAjkKFAYBDQWIGQMRBAnAG5YyAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSBIYkfgw6BWQEBTweCaC6BEwEEkmiEF4JcgwOCFg+De4IxhgCEEG8BAQEBgQeBNwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,526,1418083200"; d="scan'208";a="160201872" X-IP-Direction: OUT Received: from 81-170-77-10.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com (HELO pegasus.bayofrum.net) ([81.170.77.10]) by smtp.pipex.tiscali.co.uk with ESMTP; 05 Feb 2015 21:55:29 +0000 Received: from [10.33.53.57] (unknown [149.254.182.154]) by pegasus.bayofrum.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F163167484; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:55:25 +0000 (GMT) User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: transmission-daemon-2.84_1 From: Chris Rees Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 21:55:18 +0000 To: Andrew Hotlab , "crees@FreeBSD.org" Message-ID: X-bayofrum-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-bayofrum-MailScanner-ID: F163167484.AD8E4 X-bayofrum-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-bayofrum-MailScanner-From: crees@physics.org X-Spam-Status: No Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 21:55:39 -0000 Hi Andrew, On 5 February 2015 19:41:54 GMT+00:00, Andrew Hotlab wrote: >Hi to all. Sorry to disturb, but I had not been able to solve the issue >by myself, and I suspect the problem lies somewhere after the version >2.82 of Transmission. >I have been happily run transmission daemon in a jail for several >years, but since the version 2.83 the daemon makes a core dumps and >exits after a fews second since it starts. >I waited for the latest 2.84 release, but the problem still plague me. >I'm running it on FreeBSD 9.3/amd64. It crashes both inside and outside >a jail. >It looks like there is some other people having issue with the latest >releases:https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/transmission-exited-on-signal-11-core-dumped.49483/https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197125 >If it can help, I just tried running the 2.84 port inside a FreeBSD >10.1/amd64 jail, and it works fine. I attached the gzipped core dump of >transmission-daemon 2.84 on FreeBSD 9.3. I was never able to reproduce the bug, and suggested to the original reporter that they contact upstream. I've been particularly useless with bugs semi-recently for several reasons, so I'm really sorry that I haven't been able to personally investigate. Are the configuration and torrents identical for both instances you're trying? Chris -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 5 23:12:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CC10619; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 23:12:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x229.google.com (mail-wg0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8FE7D4F; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 23:12:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id a1so10411449wgh.0; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 15:12:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=zC2LXYdb+8yHX0P175jt+mjyxAuCn13/SMi85+5TDIA=; b=skoUzfAggo6QLfMZcooJQsuxx4lvAk6Vszi8e5e74NauYTzDKs47NvokSlqDizBgDo 7Uy+4gAD5UdpEwpY1f5bRS7R0IgeAI+f0w0qL+fipSXRx6adhldXIs9jpLTgeyKyX3u7 tj0hYnF9qHCpJhy7Fq8SbOHgjGcb7XI1vHgbZLg9Ou8lISXEC/CbZQk3xyTKCSahmv6u RkryAyEpDq4OWMvAQ6BkmB521pTYIpFdj2wqinZeV9+XJEJ/hhnrCrDQB8ikZ42XYGDp d18WfiKARiDORD0lpjR6/DjFGQ6mLtZ8BiMi5o2Csrz/9YrIJTVjqJJ14FeUxfTucptF X0Sw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.195.13.104 with SMTP id ex8mr1327514wjd.12.1423177923159; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 15:12:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.241.132 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:12:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 07:12:03 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: transmission-daemon-2.84_1 From: Ben Woods To: Chris Rees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "crees@FreeBSD.org" , Andrew Hotlab , "ports@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 23:12:05 -0000 For the record, I am running transmission-daemon 2.84_1 in a jail on FreeBSD 10.1 amd64 with no issues. I have the following lines in rc.conf: transmission_enable="YES" transmission_download_dir="/media/downloads" transmission_flags="-a 127.0.0.*,192.168.1.*" Regards, Ben On Friday, February 6, 2015, Chris Rees wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On 5 February 2015 19:41:54 GMT+00:00, Andrew Hotlab < > andrew.hotlab@hotmail.com > wrote: > >Hi to all. Sorry to disturb, but I had not been able to solve the issue > >by myself, and I suspect the problem lies somewhere after the version > >2.82 of Transmission. > >I have been happily run transmission daemon in a jail for several > >years, but since the version 2.83 the daemon makes a core dumps and > >exits after a fews second since it starts. > >I waited for the latest 2.84 release, but the problem still plague me. > >I'm running it on FreeBSD 9.3/amd64. It crashes both inside and outside > >a jail. > >It looks like there is some other people having issue with the latest > >releases: > https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/transmission-exited-on-signal-11-core-dumped.49483/https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197125 > >If it can help, I just tried running the 2.84 port inside a FreeBSD > >10.1/amd64 jail, and it works fine. I attached the gzipped core dump of > >transmission-daemon 2.84 on FreeBSD 9.3. > > I was never able to reproduce the bug, and suggested to the original > reporter that they contact upstream. I've been particularly useless with > bugs semi-recently for several reasons, so I'm really sorry that I haven't > been able to personally investigate. > > Are the configuration and torrents identical for both instances you're > trying? > > Chris > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " > -- -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 01:54:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 408833FE for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 01:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com (mail-pd0-f180.google.com [209.85.192.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 151D9DF8 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 01:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdjy10 with SMTP id y10so11385158pdj.9 for ; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 17:54:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=0NBoUw283KO/daojhVgD9rIzestfyN+9+BUg+8Wcysw=; b=uFqfFBCm/qViUKPRhRT4dP8zXzmPrpLkcuprWova/v9vMO4yJH2HSYFyLmXlciBE87 DRmRKN9AFR+jHwYDTYscLP1bPT4xk7rE4bnTVg97brkt+hBQKVF1zpEWghwHVLpKzxC1 WXLarLxgDATaiKJfEda8rv7714cYZZKlM3dE7XatHu6nTzT4tm4/yyNHfmlO/Y+aa+0K Qt92yaO6eVgGCKui4vqHDBjt1vxZn1W3kahUuoPgrEAp4iRyQrbADPftmMwo6/P+HxUu 7SuqlBysuwSp790dl3jsWFtOZuFORHtqf4m6BLmCVmaYXw9UME9+AdKW0+L8WVP3u1rR vHQA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.138.194 with SMTP id qs2mr1820841pbb.8.1423187645562; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 17:54:05 -0800 (PST) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.67.22.231 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:54:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <859719.90543.bm@smtp118.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:54:05 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4y59Gz056TNTRGSo_LPALY6-sRI Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to use mkntfs, I get "not a block device" From: Kevin Oberman To: "O'Connor, Daniel" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Thomas Mueller , FreeBSD Ports ML X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 01:54:12 -0000 On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 1:39 PM, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: > > > On 6 Feb 2015, at 06:03, Thomas Mueller > wrote: > > > > In running > > mkntfs -F /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 > > > > I got (do I need to be concerned?) > > > > root@amelia:/usr/ports # mkntfs -F /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 > > /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 is not a block device. > > mkntfs forced anyway. > > The partition start sector was not specified for /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 and > it could not be obtained automatically. It has been set to 0. > > The number of sectors per track was not specified for > /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 and it could not be obtained automatically. It has > been set to 0. > > The number of heads was not specified for /dev/gpt/SeaExp1-03 and it > could not be obtained automatically. It has been set to 0. > > Cluster size has been automatically set to 4096 bytes. > > To boot from a device, Windows needs the 'partition start sector', the > 'sectors per track' and the 'number of heads' to be set. > > Windows will not be able to boot from this device. > > Initializing device with zeroes: 0% > > 100% - Done. > > Creating NTFS volume structures. > > mkntfs completed successfully. Have a nice day. > > root@amelia:/usr/ports # > > So long as you don't want to do boot Windows from it, it should be fine. > > I imagine the port could be fixed to fetch those but I guess no one has > bothered. > > > It took many hours, partition size was 500 GB, I let it run while I was > in bed. > > I forgot - it does a full format (i.e. zeroes every sector) by default - > if you pass -f it will do a quick format instead (see the man page) > > -- > Daniel O'Connor > "The nice thing about standards is that there > are so many of them to choose from." > -- Andrew Tanenbaum > GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C > > I might also suggest an init job to unmount all fusefs file systems at shutdown. It appears that the fuse daemon may exist before volumes are unmounted. I was having to do a disk repair fairly often to fix issues with both NTFS and ExFAT volumes after updating them and shutting down the system with them still mounted. I added the following init script to /usr/local/etc/rc.d. Since then, I have not had a corruption of an NTFS system. I am not currently using ExFAT. #!/bin/sh # # PROVIDE: unmount-fuse # REQUIRE: DAEMON # BEFORE: LOGIN # KEYWORD: shutdown nostart . /etc/rc.subr name="unmount-fuse" start_cmd=":" stop_cmd="fuse_stop" fuse_stop() { local err fusefs # unmount fuse filesystems err=0 echo -n 'Unmounting all fusefs filesystems...' for fs in `df | grep ^/dev/fuse | cut -f6 -w` ; do echo -n " $fs" umount $fs done echo "" } load_rc_config $name run_rc_command "$1" -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 06:50:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E339568 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 06:50:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx.waitman.net (mx.waitman.net [136.0.16.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392B9FB1 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 06:50:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mx.waitman.net (Postfix, from userid 2) id D51DD435A6; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 22:43:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=waitman.net; s=default; t=1423204990; bh=tx+i2GGj8OhIwGXAAWL5eRjKbymo90uTeQfiJp2S3IE=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Reply-To; b=hKBeh3XUA3CLhstHps9u5PKcuhJ2Yj/KuCui7P6llI3sByKRzw23LQkpdY2wqmugW BW/8krS3gKWGZrggllzPPIXdcp52fnKlKqbKEvb8B7ZLEFrQnDLgLgRWhtjUy0zvUX DiQ/rhiD7xHzM/VeuOJ9lDTyht+ZSAiOWojz08fc= Received: from 70.90.171.37 by mx.waitman.net with HTTP; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 22:43:10 -0800 Message-ID: <89510189ec45d18c41eb40e03420a429.squirrel@mx.waitman.net> Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 22:43:10 -0800 Subject: poudriere and astro/gpsd From: "Waitman Gobble" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Reply-To: waitman@waitman.net User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.2 [SVN] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 06:50:36 -0000 Hi, Is there a solution for this problem? #poudriere bulk -j 11armv632 -p local -f build-rpi-b-gpsd.ports [00:00:28] ====>> Starting jail 11armv632-local [00:00:28] ====>> Creating user/group nobodyjexec: execvp(): pw: Exec format error [00:00:28] ====>> Error: Unable to create group nobody Thank you, -- Waitman Gobble Los Altos California USA +1.510-830-7975 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 08:48:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F6D9C4E for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 08:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15FEBCE1 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 08:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t168mShK020309 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 08:48:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 196930] [Patch] security/ipsec-tools: Upgrade to 0.8.2 and add wildcard-PSK-option Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:48:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: bugzilla.freebsd@omnilan.de X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vanhu@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 08:48:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196930 Harald Schmalzbauer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #6 from Harald Schmalzbauer --- (In reply to ncrogers from comment #5) I guess vanhu@ (maintainer) has replied in comment4, but according to svn log it seems he doesn't have committ bit. I don't have either... Who/how can we find somebody? CCing ports@ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 09:04:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26200117 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:04:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B183E81 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:04:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1694pnQ026793 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:04:51 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 196930] [Patch] security/ipsec-tools: Upgrade to 0.8.2 and add wildcard-PSK-option Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 09:04:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: pi@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vanhu@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 09:04:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196930 Kurt Jaeger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pi@FreeBSD.org Status|New |In Progress --- Comment #7 from Kurt Jaeger --- I'll test it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 09:38:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19983ACE for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:38:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00123218 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:38:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t169cZUK023654 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:38:35 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t169cZoV023653; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:38:35 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201502060938.t169cZoV023653@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:38:35 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 09:38:36 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ converters/p5-Encode | 2.68 | 2.70 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/pecl-mongo | 1.6.0 | 1.6.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/pgpoolAdmin | 3.3.1 | 3.4.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ mail/qmail-autoresponder | 0.97 | 0.98 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 10:59:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3B4C913 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:59:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.eeeit.de (mail.eeeit.de [37.120.160.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A76AED13 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 10:59:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.eeeit.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eeeit.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC7281801 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 11:59:01 +0100 (CET) Received: (from www@localhost) by mail.eeeit.de (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t16Ax1ba010664; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 11:59:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mike@reifenberger.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.eeeit.de: www set sender to mike@reifenberger.com using -f To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Dependent ports use different c++ compilers X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:59:01 +0000 From: mike@reifenberger.com Message-ID: <82331707f0d5a232c9b9368f7d056996@reifenberger.com> X-Sender: mike@reifenberger.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:59:04 -0000 Hi, kicad-devel depends at least on two c++ libraries: boost-lib and webkit-gtk2. kicad-devel and boost uses: USES+= compiler:c++11-lang This leads at least under FreeBSD 9.3 and 10.* to the usage of clang++ webkit-gtk2 uses: USES += compiler:c++11-lib This leads at least under FreeBSD 9.3 to the usage of GNU g++ (FreeBSD 10+ is using clang++) and this leads to missing symbols when linking kicad-devel. How can this dilemma be resolved? Greetings --- Mike (mr@) From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 17:01:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07A79D07 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 17:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.rlwinm.de (smtp.rlwinm.de [148.251.233.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC385DC0 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 17:01:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from m4800.rlwinm.de (unknown [87.253.189.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.rlwinm.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 020F715AFA for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 18:01:32 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54D4F36C.6050401@rlwinm.de> Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 18:01:32 +0100 From: Crest User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg and https-based repo with self-signed cert References: <20150205205253.GQ44537@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20150205205253.GQ44537@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 17:01:43 -0000 On 05.02.2015 21:52, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > How do I get pkg to accept a self-signed cert if the repo is running > under https ? > > Thanks for any hints! There is no need to use TLS as transport encryption, because repos can be signed. It's not only more efficient to transport unencrypted signed files than relying on transport encryption it also allows repos to be replicated to untrusted mirrors and proxies. There is no harm in encrypting your HTTP transfers with TLS if your package mirror enough CPU power to spare. You gain little by encrypting your package downloads because a passive attacker can still fingerprint the fetched packages by their size and dependencies. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 17:19:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0698694 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 17:19:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9189FF50 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 17:19:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YJmYm-0004rr-Lw; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 18:19:16 +0100 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 18:19:16 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Crest Subject: Re: pkg and https-based repo with self-signed cert Message-ID: <20150206171916.GT44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150205205253.GQ44537@home.opsec.eu> <54D4F36C.6050401@rlwinm.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54D4F36C.6050401@rlwinm.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 17:19:15 -0000 Hi! > > How do I get pkg to accept a self-signed cert if the repo is running > > under https ? > > Thanks for any hints! > There is no need to use TLS as transport encryption, because repos can > be signed. It's more along the lines of 'encrypt all the things'... I'm playing with changing all http stuff to https in general and one of them is my repo... -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 19:03:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB853A1C for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 19:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.mimar.rs (smtp.mimar.rs [193.53.106.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6677ADA1 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 19:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vscan.mimar.rs (vscan.mimar.rs [193.53.106.134]) by smtp.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA32D898D6 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 20:03:14 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mimar.rs; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:mime-version :x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:subject:from :from:date:date:received:received; s=mimar-0901; t=1423249391; x=1425063792; bh=1sN3sg1TLje9fkBQDYeNRGWO9mxuolFTWnPDstPKuZQ=; b= lay49v+790weCqL9q41Jw4Xrmo4NNxKc1uQVD3LjcebUulfBdcUa3J+7Ad/Yjd0S GFD1NAb87WqdyDnbc0NFask6vqrCaK97FenUi8Y/N9uXh8rI+HbJjHtJdM1biMq2 LJRD2ERmR62/5UKtKVrHe60/+6dTIY6S+EX7z75G0Hg= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mimar.rs Received: from smtp.mimar.rs ([193.53.106.135]) by vscan.mimar.rs (vscan.mimar.rs [193.53.106.134]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 7AMcD3ZPcGmO for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 20:03:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from efreet.mimar.rs (178-223-63-13.dynamic.isp.telekom.rs [178.223.63.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marko.cupac@mimar.rs) by smtp.mimar.rs (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9EA27898D5 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 20:03:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 20:03:09 +0100 From: Marko =?UTF-8?B?Q3VwYcSH?= To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg and https-based repo with self-signed cert Message-ID: <20150206200309.0d2fb13c@efreet.mimar.rs> In-Reply-To: <20150206171916.GT44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150205205253.GQ44537@home.opsec.eu> <54D4F36C.6050401@rlwinm.de> <20150206171916.GT44537@home.opsec.eu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 19:03:18 -0000 On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 18:19:16 +0100 Kurt Jaeger wrote: > It's more along the lines of 'encrypt all the things'... >=20 > I'm playing with changing all http stuff to https in general and > one of them is my repo... Indeed, it could happen that - in a few years or a few decades - someone finds log with "metadata" showing me installing encrypted signed packages from my own pkg repo. Who can be sure that punishment for such actions won't be imprisonment or death at that time? Better be safe than sorry... :tongue in a cheek (or not?): --=20 Marko Cupa=C4=87 https://www.mimar.rs From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 19:31:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31BC7F5A for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 19:31:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com (mail-wi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BECF4FAD for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 19:31:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id bs8so4813648wib.5 for ; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 11:31:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=kiDFkRcwqQg2nG1OYaO6vgUAHqOSoYrqyj2w1PHy0UQ=; b=AfXDghApbEmpakKUB1mwuB0kGsdL3VD4h8NJzt4lxcCCJ7rJcOWjJ8u2lSorpjEfWe 1pdmG0PCQjZpz/z0LPuoQJpW/qB+7yN/nnZcjGAwmSLG9du+dXjWwHTarSMRa0oN5Pnd w0b5W+qJ2768XThznpINOFYQi/4XvCeaNhK1WsGq23LuO51xBA3sJ5Sx1HRhcTMZ74y7 GHlb4Xx6houCm7863sbu41Jz4VVWdn7co3jZjqGwWboZ+xdYc5NsDRFX2XjL69cGULDC PhfF3WdAuQtuf4QYhKPtTwmXCk/iYW2ni52J5b+buZRDtxAlWtPHZ6d8GoShH1ZboxH3 quvA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.90.210 with SMTP id by18mr10844990wjb.80.1423251065875; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 11:31:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.81.1 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 11:31:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 20:31:05 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Hotfix and unbreak update that need to be commited From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 19:31:08 -0000 Could any commiter take care of https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197378 that updates devel/visualparadigm with a hotfix just released by the upstream project? Please note that there was a previous yet-to-be-commited bug report (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197108) that is subdued by the one above. And if the commiter is kind enough to take care of https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197135 that updates graphics/opennurbs since it seems to break cad/qcad (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187506) due to a nasty zlib miss interaction, it would be really appreciated :) Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 19:40:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24661180 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 19:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09B9E1C9 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 19:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t16Jej3s032058 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 19:40:45 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 196930] [Patch] security/ipsec-tools: Upgrade to 0.8.2 and add wildcard-PSK-option Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 19:40:45 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: pi@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pi@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 19:40:47 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196930 Kurt Jaeger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|vanhu@FreeBSD.org |pi@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #8 from Kurt Jaeger --- builds fine on 10.1a, 9.3a, but breaks on 8.4i ? http://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/security__ipsec-tools-84i-1423248840.txt Any ideas ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 19:50:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F34271D for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 19:50:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 041E4250 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 19:50:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t16JodwK041434 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 19:50:39 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 196930] [Patch] security/ipsec-tools: Upgrade to 0.8.2 and add wildcard-PSK-option Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 19:50:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: pi@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pi@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 19:50:40 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196930 --- Comment #9 from Kurt Jaeger --- ipsec-tools is excpecting utmpx which is missing on 8.x. So this version is only for newer versions of FreeBSD. Can someone provide a patch to still work with utmp ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 19:58:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37D7593D for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 19:58:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DE4B36E for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 19:58:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t16JweRA079038 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 19:58:40 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 196930] [Patch] security/ipsec-tools: Upgrade to 0.8.2 and add wildcard-PSK-option Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 19:58:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: ohauer@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pi@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 19:58:41 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196930 Olli Hauer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ohauer@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #10 from Olli Hauer --- Perhaps Ed can take a look. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2010-January/014893.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 20:04:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0875EB6C for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 20:04:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3D60635 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 20:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t16K4S3E019457 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 20:04:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 196930] [Patch] security/ipsec-tools: Upgrade to 0.8.2 and add wildcard-PSK-option Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 20:04:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: pi@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pi@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 20:04:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196930 --- Comment #11 from Kurt Jaeger --- Thanks, I poked ed@ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 20:20:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42722FE5 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 20:20:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 298647CF for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 20:20:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t16KK5r8065114 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 20:20:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 196930] [Patch] security/ipsec-tools: Upgrade to 0.8.2 and add wildcard-PSK-option Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 20:20:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pi@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 20:20:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196930 John Marino changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org | --- Comment #12 from John Marino --- *Never* CC the ports mailing list, thanks. I am removing it from the list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 20:38:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3541868B for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 20:38:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2F269B4 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 20:38:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YJpfO-0005SI-M0; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 21:38:18 +0100 Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:38:18 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Fernando =?iso-8859-1?Q?Apestegu=EDa?= Subject: Re: Hotfix and unbreak update that need to be commited Message-ID: <20150206203818.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 20:38:18 -0000 Hi! > Could any commiter take care of > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197378 > that updates devel/visualparadigm with a hotfix just released by the > upstream project? I'm testing it right now. > Please note that there was a previous yet-to-be-commited bug report > (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197108) that is > subdued by the one above. So I've closed that older PR as it's superseded by the newer PR. > And if the commiter is kind enough to take care of > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197135 that updates Done. > graphics/opennurbs since it seems to break cad/qcad > (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187506) due to a > nasty zlib miss interaction, it would be really appreciated :) Closed 187506 as resolved. I did not do run-tests, as I have no pratical experience with those programs, but if its broken, please open a new PR. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 20:54:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 810C3E53 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 20:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp78.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp78.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B7CEC3D for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 20:54:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp10.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp10.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7483C3804A5 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:45:37 -0500 (EST) Received: by smtp10.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: rhavenn-AT-rhavenn.net) with ESMTPSA id 197ED38054C for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 15:45:36 -0500 (EST) X-Sender-Id: rhavenn@rhavenn.net Received: from vash.rhavenn.local ([UNAVAILABLE]. [209.112.171.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:25 (trex/5.4.2); Fri, 06 Feb 2015 20:47:52 GMT Received: from localhost (4000@localhost [local]); by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 45ef3b10; for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 11:45:35 -0900 (AKST) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 11:45:35 -0900 From: Henrik Hudson To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: www/linkchecker change? Message-ID: <20150206204535.GA3489@vash.rhavenn.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 20:54:01 -0000 So, installing www/linkchecker without GTK2 and/or QT4 selected still pulls in a lot of GUI options due to the INSTALLS_ICONS option. Can this be changed to: .if ${PORT_OPTIONS:MGTK2} || ${PORT_OPTIONS:MQT4} INSTALLS_ICONS= yes .endif That keeps it more basic for a server / console install. Yes? No? thanks. henrik -- Henrik Hudson lists@rhavenn.net ----------------------------------------- "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr; UF From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 21:38:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EAECA51 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:38:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.grem.de (outcast.grem.de [213.239.217.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 942A5F5 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 21:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40306 invoked by uid 89); 6 Feb 2015 21:38:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.84.119.154?) (mg@grem.de@109.43.0.108) by mail.grem.de with ESMTPA; 6 Feb 2015 21:38:02 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: pkg and https-based repo with self-signed cert From: Michael Gmelin X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B466) In-Reply-To: <20150206200309.0d2fb13c@efreet.mimar.rs> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 22:40:10 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <93AF79F4-2F54-4490-80D5-B7B68045F234@grem.de> References: <20150205205253.GQ44537@home.opsec.eu> <54D4F36C.6050401@rlwinm.de> <20150206171916.GT44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150206200309.0d2fb13c@efreet.mimar.rs> To: =?utf-8?Q?Marko_Cupa=C4=87?= Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 21:38:13 -0000 > On 06 Feb 2015, at 20:03, Marko Cupa=C4=87 wrote: >=20 > On Fri, 6 Feb 2015 18:19:16 +0100 > Kurt Jaeger wrote: >=20 >> It's more along the lines of 'encrypt all the things'... >>=20 >> I'm playing with changing all http stuff to https in general and >> one of them is my repo... >=20 > Indeed, it could happen that - in a few years or a few decades - someone > finds log with "metadata" showing me installing encrypted signed > packages from my own pkg repo. Who can be sure that punishment for such > actions won't be imprisonment or death at that time? Better be safe > than sorry... >=20 > :tongue in a cheek (or not?): For me it's about bidirectional trust as I'm also building "private" package= s. Plus, I don't want any unencrypted traffic on our network. > --=20 > Marko Cupa=C4=87 > https://www.mimar.rs > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 6 22:00:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C8F71AF for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 22:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEB8831A for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 22:00:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id n3so5555347wiv.3 for ; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 14:00:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=T9I/rJ6Zy0mJC22iOhbQ4dSVwkQbrbMkMVKg0PS/uZw=; b=qlMB3A7bRjTLE/TN0LFxWZuh8H7XxXLh0GTKoCUgaddUrrytKlSckTwQK4Xos11fka ZAW/vL9B7ObM4f5UO9QHw083Zfcvb81NiP58LLtZEPYmVA3NxSo7wmuVRNxUxDvScogw 4DsJh3SCOwiEV+aX9ZwC8cZfOntvhXQD6gWDPUhpn/kOPZRvAjJKSix+o1bVG9I4c/t8 iXOAn6BTQRIZICrJBQUTphsJWWRWY59t+BaFeA7VQRal/w2jJst+IHlolUbSf4dAPR4I Ec896uySByXGtSX9cIzbPHZo9IdSyZL0mzIPJUTEFoYJB1QDNFY8y89Ngrccm3xYoxvO jNzQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.90.210 with SMTP id by18mr12113771wjb.80.1423260050747; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 14:00:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.81.1 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:00:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.81.1 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:00:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150206203818.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150206203818.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 23:00:50 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hotfix and unbreak update that need to be commited From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= To: Kurt Jaeger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 22:00:53 -0000 El 06/02/2015 21:38, "Kurt Jaeger" escribi=C3=B3: > > Hi! > > > Could any commiter take care of > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197378 > > that updates devel/visualparadigm with a hotfix just released by the > > upstream project? > > I'm testing it right now. > > > Please note that there was a previous yet-to-be-commited bug report > > (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197108) that is > > subdued by the one above. > > So I've closed that older PR as it's superseded by the newer PR. > > > And if the commiter is kind enough to take care of > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197135 that updates > > Done. > > > graphics/opennurbs since it seems to break cad/qcad > > (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D187506) due to a > > nasty zlib miss interaction, it would be really appreciated :) > > Closed 187506 as resolved. I did not do run-tests, as I have no > pratical experience with those programs, but if its broken, > please open a new PR. Ok. Thanks! > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 01:31:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 633E8C09 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 01:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x22a.google.com (mail-qa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E69EC8C for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 01:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id dc16so13647810qab.1 for ; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 17:31:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2AuP5z5EXfnk3zYv77sZvh1zegQaweVnOnkGFnfidfg=; b=k8SD+GMkA8Pkr95xQEqlexL1Hzarya90iPWJ8QePaA6YiCsnoZyqrPFx0spE/kOfs8 JUxwTQtCzUeWCc7vCnqcVLUgBYyuD/CRM1rlgnParKUyeM+InUAal3+mcRFZZWRRwPBt nYZCHptG7Y+xxl+0tIn2fFdgBeYJCCrPdMVWslWe7AVzShXeRgblId7n2z1LKi8xsacT uB2uwF3AJWj6Jg+HlFQ7ItVjt231zwwpR3DaCljLGMgF/rrRJ7RgKQ7YVgtYULTMhf8g NFRFEJgNhYPBWVskwQzM/NQ/abgOWg7/SsmAjQQ5i87xZ7z7SwVithQSY0k9YrmCAQhF OzhQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.72.8 with SMTP id k8mr15045807qaj.26.1423272670305; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 17:31:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.158.137 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 17:31:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 03:31:10 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Is NO_PKG_REGISTER still supposed to work? From: Kimmo Paasiala To: freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 01:31:11 -0000 >From bsd.port.mk: # NO_PKG_REGISTER # - Don't register a port installation as a package. However, testing this with a port results in the port installation performing the staging part only and the final installation from the stage directory on to the system being skipped when NO_PKG_REGISTER is set. Is this still supposed to work? -Kimmo From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 02:52:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA25BC96 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 02:52:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from maul.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87CAE683 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 02:52:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rancor.immure.com ([10.1.132.9]) by maul.immure.com with esmtp (Exim 4.85 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YJpuu-00078Y-2T for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 14:54:20 -0600 Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t16KsJJT097416 for ; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:54:19 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t16KsJdS097415 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:54:19 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:54:19 -0600 From: Bob Willcox To: ports list Message-ID: <20150206205419.GD96060@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 10.1.132.9 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bob@immure.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on maul.immure.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: multimedia/x264 build failure X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on maul.immure.com) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 02:52:36 -0000 I'm getting the following error when trying to build x264: cc -o x264 x264.o input/input.o input/timecode.o input/raw.o input/y4m.o output/raw.o output/matroska.o output/matroska_ebml.o output/flv.o output/flv_bytestream.o filters/filters.o filters/video/video.o filters/video/source.o filters/video/internal.o filters/video/resize.o filters/video/cache.o filters/video/fix_vfr_pts.o filters/video/select_every.o filters/video/crop.o filters/video/depth.o input/thread.o output/mp4.o -lgpac -lz -L/usr/local/lib -lx264 -m64 -fstack-protector -L/usr/local/lib -lm -pthread x264.o: In function `main': x264.c:(.text+0x1aea): undefined reference to `x264_encoder_open_142' cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) Makefile:177: recipe for target 'x264' failed gmake[1]: *** [x264] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/multimedia/x264/work/x264-snapshot-20140827-2245-stable' ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the failure to the maintainer. *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/multimedia/x264 Also, I get these warnings on every compilation: cc -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wshadow -O3 -ffast-math -m64 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -I. -I. -I/usr/local/include -std=gnu99 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-tree-vectorize -c -o output/mp4.o output/mp4.c warning: unknown warning option '-Wno-maybe-uninitialized'; did you mean '-Wno-uninitialized'? [-Wunknown-warning-option] warning: unknown warning option '-Wno-maybe-uninitialized'; did you mean '-Wno-uninitialized'? [-Wunknown-warning-option] But they don't seem to be failing the build (it's the link error shown above). I'm currently at revision 378554 (just updated minutes ago). System info: FreeBSD vader.immure.com 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 r276511: Thu Jan 1 16:19:21 CST 2015 bob@vader.immure.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 Bob -- Bob Willcox | You climb to reach the summit, but once bob@immure.com | there, discover that all roads lead down. Austin, TX | -- Stanislaw Lem, "The Cyberiad" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 03:11:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FCEED4 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 03:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3CF991 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 03:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp118-210-122-88.lns20.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([118.210.122.88]) by ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2015 13:40:56 +1030 Message-ID: <54D5823F.9070503@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 13:40:55 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: mike@reifenberger.com, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dependent ports use different c++ compilers References: <82331707f0d5a232c9b9368f7d056996@reifenberger.com> In-Reply-To: <82331707f0d5a232c9b9368f7d056996@reifenberger.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 03:11:05 -0000 On 06/02/2015 21:29, mike@reifenberger.com wrote: > Hi, > kicad-devel depends at least on two c++ libraries: boost-lib and > webkit-gtk2. > > kicad-devel and boost uses: > USES+= compiler:c++11-lang > This leads at least under FreeBSD 9.3 and 10.* to the usage of clang++ > > webkit-gtk2 uses: > USES += compiler:c++11-lib > This leads at least under FreeBSD 9.3 to the usage of GNU g++ (FreeBSD > 10+ is using clang++) > and this leads to missing symbols when linking kicad-devel. > > How can this dilemma be resolved? > > Greetings > --- > Mike (mr@) The newc++stack wiki page has some tips on using both libc++ and libstdc++ https://wiki.freebsd.org/NewC++Stack -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing Shane Ambler From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 04:17:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27CFB9E1 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 04:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5602CFC4 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 04:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p57BCF3DE.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.188.243.222]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t173Yuvd050895; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 04:34:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id t173VK2o022976; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 04:31:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t173Umnm003266; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 04:31:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201502070331.t173Umnm003266@fire.js.berklix.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Fund a FreeBSD manager maybe ? Was: BIND REPLACE_BASE option From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:30:59 +0100." <54B66183.8040403@sorbs.net> Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 04:30:48 +0100 Cc: Michelle Sullivan X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 04:17:53 -0000 Michelle Sullivan wrote: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:30:59 +0100 > Matt Smith wrote: > > On Jan 14 12:15, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > >> > >> Well, like I said, REPLACE_BASE was an abomination that should never > >> have > >> existed, now that it's gone, it'll never get back, and you'll never > >> see it > >> again. > >> > > > > Doug Barton who used to maintain BIND in both the base system and the > > port used to always say that the version in the base system was only > > designed to be used as a local resolver on a laptop/desktop. If it was > > used as a proper DNS server the port version was meant to be used > > instead. Based on this it makes perfect sense why BIND was replaced > > with local Unbound in the base, and the ports system still has BIND > > for people that were using it. > > Was this ever documented? (I've been using bind in base for servers for > many years and this is the first time I've heard of it - and it is > unlikely I'm the only one.) Agreed, Ditto. In 'man named' on 9.2-RELEASE there's no: For local resolver only. Will be deleted on release 9.3. Migrate to ports/dns/bind9[689] About the same time, working ports demime & majordomo also got butchered, delaying me; deletions delayed that person late leaving work who also mentioned nslookup & asked approx: "~Will it ever end ?~. No. Unscheduled removals won't stop, unless FreeBSD gets a manager to enforce proper warning schedules & discipline code butchers who have intermittently damaged FreeBSD for years. Many people hosting FreeBSD dont have time to waste tracking many lists in case butchers delete code. Un-warned deletions are Un-professional. Labelling someone a manager is easy; getting a good manager is harder; one tough enough to suspend commiters (inc. perhaps friends) yet harder; one effective without the range of carrots & sticks available for paid employees, yet harder, & we'd hope that manager be unpaid too ? That reliable miracle hasn't happened yet. Too much code has been deleted un-warned between releases. Maybe the FreeBSD Foundation could fund a part time Change Warning Manager: - To impose regular unilateral 30/90 day suspensions on commiters, without need of consuming core debate. - To implement SVN reversals of suspended commiters. - Not allowed to commit own stuff, just notices scheduling later changes, - Subject to being dismissed by a 2/3 vote of core. It would make FreeBSD more professional & dependable, & benefit user businesses who could consider with core@freebsd.org & https://www.freebsdfoundation.org/board how they might contribute to & shape such a function. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com Indent previous with "> ". Interleave reply paragraphs like a play script. Send plain text, not quoted-printable, HTML, base64, or multipart/alternative. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 06:42:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13CB32F1 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 06:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA53EE76 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 06:42:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id l61so17481521wev.8 for ; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 22:42:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=CvqV3DL1SfjzUNOLphno8z7E/ncZdDNjgipg2hrPnPk=; b=fXyWwSKhEcczOOx9ObC/9tf3cbzR9edb1do7knoZ/ahopcyz047PRO0naVVnV89m7P NGamQMF5vKGbCgNen85VGsQ+0l3DRqt2WlSUvr/u2lNC1WG/YqR9ZEGmY/xx5mEgemvw GvEoGblHjXqk4AXNpMowmR8vS0htKOYY45rkHNXd04RqaVOMdQCUpNAwdu5j4JvFT7c2 YHS7TRVl9JNJgl2AH4lbp0YzqNOfvnR/6YUjcNVTJcICApQVJvlcjpzmrfsr5aazW2mD YSGnSlL5k0XHXWHWVopsCIkt1/PR/xL9YG1dF5jkHj00lUzG0WNpYO9q+/6OJMANmW8p 7GXQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.7.199 with SMTP id l7mr11139122wia.66.1423291365009; Fri, 06 Feb 2015 22:42:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.241.132 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 22:42:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150206205419.GD96060@rancor.immure.com> References: <20150206205419.GD96060@rancor.immure.com> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 14:42:44 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: multimedia/x264 build failure From: Ben Woods To: Bob Willcox Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: ports list X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 06:42:47 -0000 This issue was discussed in November here: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2014-November/096717.html The result was an entry being added to UPDATING, which can be found here: https://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=2729771+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2014/svn-ports-all/20141130.svn-ports-all "With the recent split of multimedia/x264 in library and binary and library components, if an application that uses libx264 is updated before x264 itself, multimedia/libx264 will conflict with the existing x264 package. Delete this package before continuing any update that depends on it: # pkg delete -f x264 Install the updated x264 and/or upgrade the other applications that depend on libx264, such as ffmpeg." Regards, Ben On Saturday, February 7, 2015, Bob Willcox wrote: > I'm getting the following error when trying to build x264: > > cc -o x264 x264.o input/input.o input/timecode.o input/raw.o input/y4m.o > output/raw.o output/matroska.o output/matroska_ebml.o output/flv.o > output/flv_bytestream.o filters/filters.o filters/video/video.o > filters/video/source.o filters/video/internal.o filters/video/resize.o > filters/video/cache.o filters/video/fix_vfr_pts.o > filters/video/select_every.o filters/video/crop.o filters/video/depth.o > input/thread.o output/mp4.o -lgpac -lz -L/usr/local/lib -lx264 -m64 > -fstack-protector -L/usr/local/lib -lm -pthread > x264.o: In function `main': > x264.c:(.text+0x1aea): undefined reference to `x264_encoder_open_142' > cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see > invocation) > Makefile:177: recipe for target 'x264' failed > gmake[1]: *** [x264] Error 1 > gmake[1]: Leaving directory > '/usr/ports/multimedia/x264/work/x264-snapshot-20140827-2245-stable' > ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. > Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the failure to > the maintainer. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/multimedia/x264 > > > Also, I get these warnings on every compilation: > > cc -Wno-maybe-uninitialized -Wshadow -O3 -ffast-math -m64 -O2 -pipe > -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -I. -I. -I/usr/local/include > -std=gnu99 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-tree-vectorize -c -o output/mp4.o > output/mp4.c > warning: unknown warning option '-Wno-maybe-uninitialized'; did you mean > '-Wno-uninitialized'? > [-Wunknown-warning-option] > warning: unknown warning option '-Wno-maybe-uninitialized'; did you mean > '-Wno-uninitialized'? > [-Wunknown-warning-option] > > But they don't seem to be failing the build (it's the link error shown > above). > > I'm currently at revision 378554 (just updated minutes ago). > > System info: > > FreeBSD vader.immure.com 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 r276511: Thu > Jan 1 16:19:21 CST 2015 bob@vader.immure.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > amd64 > > > Bob > > -- > Bob Willcox | You climb to reach the summit, but once > bob@immure.com | there, discover that all roads lead down. > Austin, TX | -- Stanislaw Lem, "The Cyberiad" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " > -- -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 07:19:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22143607 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 07:19:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC45C184 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 07:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YJzg4-0006Dc-Um; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:19:40 +0100 Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:19:40 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Fernando =?iso-8859-1?Q?Apestegu=EDa?= Subject: Re: Hotfix and unbreak update that need to be commited Message-ID: <20150207071940.GV44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150206203818.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 07:19:48 -0000 Hi! > > > And if the commiter is kind enough to take care of > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197135 that updates > > > > Done. jbeich suggests in https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/2015-February/084775.html that you improve the patch using SRC_BASE and test if SRC_BASE is available. Can you submit this and send me the PR ? I'll get it committed. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 08:04:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 553E7C83 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:04:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.73.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2320A7C8 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:04:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [204.210.114.114] ([204.210.114.114:41701] helo=localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com) by dnvrco-oedge03 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 76/49-09861-D17C5D45; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:04:45 +0000 Received: by localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5393E5D28; Fri, 6 Feb 2015 22:09:49 -1000 (HST) Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 22:09:49 -1000 From: parv To: gecko@FreeBSD.org Subject: When trying to run www/firefox 35.0_1,1: "Bus error (core dumped)" Message-ID: <20150207080949.GA1778@holstein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: gecko@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.64.142:25 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=DfmZq5dW c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lLOF/jpPrR0dcgWXP1EvZg==:117 a=lLOF/jpPrR0dcgWXP1EvZg==:17 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=Ymsr-CWnAAAA:8 a=0HtSIViG9nkA:10 a=d9Pzsa_e0kGRH1F82X4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:04:53 -0000 Please CC me as I am not subscribed to any of gecko@ & ports@ lists. Hi there, While trying to run firefox 35.0_1,1, I get ... Bus error (core dumped) "sem" has been already complied in kernel of ... FreeBSD holstein.holy.cow 8.4-STABLE FreeBSD 8.4-STABLE #1 r277822: Tue Jan 27 21:38:21 HST 2015 root@holstein.holy.cow:/misc/obj/misc/src.svn/8/sys/X200-SMP.8 i386 # kldtstat -v | fgrep sem 231 sysvsem 233 sem ... loading via /boot/loader.conf does not make a difference. And now, ident ... # ident /usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile /usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile: $FreeBSD: head/www/firefox/Makefile 378529 2015-02-06 12:08:43Z jbeich $ "Bus error" happens every time when trying to run firefox. - parv -- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 08:28:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32A2C249 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org (portsmon.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21360997 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.104]) by portsmon.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t178S8j8079601 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:08 GMT (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:08 GMT Message-Id: <201502070828.t178S8j8079601@portsmon.freebsd.org> From: linimon@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Reply-To: portmgr-feedback@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:28:09 -0000 As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. One common problem is that recent versions of FreeBSD use clang instead of gcc by default. Another common problem is that the compiles succeed on the i386 and amd64 architecture (e.g. the common Intel PC), but fail on one or more of the other architectures due to assumptions about things such as size of various types, byte-alignment issues, and so forth. In occasional cases we see that the same port may have different errors in different build environments. The script that runs on the build cluster uses heuristics to try to 'guess' the error type to help you isolate problems, but it is only a rough guide. One more note: on occasion, there are transient build errors seen on the build farm. Unfortunately, there is not yet any way for this algorithm to tell the difference (humans are much, much better at this kind of thing.) The errors are listed below. In the case where the same problem exists on more than one build environment, the URL points to the latest errorlog for that type. (By 'build environment' here we mean 'combination of 8.x/9.x/10.x/-current with target architecture'.) portname: audio/raproxy broken because: Unfetchable build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audio&portname=raproxy portname: biology/platon broken because: Unfetchable build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=biology&portname=platon portname: biology/tinker broken because: Checksum and size mismatch build errors: http://beefy1.isc.freebsd.org/bulk/93i386-RELENG_9_3/latest/logs/errors/tinker-6.2.06_4.log overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=biology&portname=tinker portname: cad/cider broken because: Will not build with bmake and USES=fmake will not solve the issue build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=cad&portname=cider portname: databases/gtksql broken because: Fails to configure build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databases&portname=gtksql portname: databases/tora broken because: Does not compile with clang (include ) build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databases&portname=tora portname: deskutils/glipper broken because: Uses unknown GNOME components pygnomedesktop and pygnomeextras build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=deskutils&portname=glipper portname: deskutils/gnochm broken because: Uses unknown GNOME component pygnomeextras build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=deskutils&portname=gnochm portname: deskutils/kupfer broken because: Uses unknown GNOME component pygnomedesktop build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=deskutils&portname=kupfer portname: deskutils/timer-applet broken because: Uses unknown GNOME component pygnomedesktop build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=deskutils&portname=timer-applet portname: devel/lua-gettext broken because: doesn't fetch build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=lua-gettext portname: devel/lua-pty broken because: doesn't fetch build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=lua-pty portname: devel/p5-Cdk broken because: Does not build with Perl 5.18 or above build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=p5-Cdk portname: devel/xtla broken because: Fails to package build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=xtla portname: editors/scribes broken because: Uses unknown GNOME component pygnomeextras build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=editors&portname=scribes portname: emulators/linux_base-gentoo-stage3 broken because: Fails to package build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=emulators&portname=linux_base-gentoo-stage3 portname: emulators/linux_dist-gentoo-stage3 broken because: Fails to package build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=emulators&portname=linux_dist-gentoo-stage3 portname: games/py-pychess broken because: Uses unknown GNOME component pygnomedesktop build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=games&portname=py-pychess portname: games/wmfortune broken because: No public disfiles build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=games&portname=wmfortune portname: graphics/gnash broken because: unable to link in libboost_system build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=gnash portname: graphics/xfpovray broken because: Fails to link build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=xfpovray portname: mail/mail-notification broken because: Run-time failure with Gnome 3 build errors: http://beefy1.isc.freebsd.org/bulk/93i386-RELENG_9_3/latest/logs/errors/mail-notification-5.4_11.log overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=mail&portname=mail-notification portname: multimedia/bombono broken because: does not build on 10.x+ build errors: http://beefy2.isc.freebsd.org/bulk/101amd64-RELENG_10_1/latest/logs/errors/bombono-1.2.2_5.log overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=multimedia&portname=bombono portname: net/nocatsplash broken because: Broken pkg-install script, should use USERS and UIDs build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=net&portname=nocatsplash portname: security/arirang broken because: Does not build with Ruby 2.0 or newer build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=security&portname=arirang portname: www/diamanda broken because: Does not work with current django build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=www&portname=diamanda From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 08:28:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA5DE342 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org (portsmon.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 986B39A7 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.104]) by portsmon.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t178SFnQ080608 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:15 GMT (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:15 GMT Message-Id: <201502070828.t178SFnQ080608@portsmon.freebsd.org> From: linimon@FreeBSD.org To: ports@FreeBSD.org Reply-To: portmgr-feedback@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:28:15 -0000 As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports that are marked as "broken" in their Makefiles. In many cases these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD build environments. One common problem is that recent versions of FreeBSD use clang instead of gcc by default. Another common problem is that the compiles succeed on the i386 and amd64 architecture (e.g. the common Intel PC), but fail on one or more of the other architectures due to assumptions about things such as size of various types, byte-alignment issues, and so forth. In occasional cases we see that the same port may have different errors in different build environments. The script that runs on the build cluster uses heuristics to try to 'guess' the error type to help you isolate problems, but it is only a rough guide. One more note: on occasion, there are transient build errors seen on the build farm. Unfortunately, there is not yet any way for this algorithm to tell the difference (humans are much, much better at this kind of thing.) The errors are listed below. In the case where the same problem exists on more than one build environment, the URL points to the latest errorlog for that type. (By 'build environment' here we mean 'combination of 8.x/9.x/10.x/-current with target architecture'.) portname: archivers/ruby-lha broken because: Does not build with Ruby 2.0 or Ruby 2.1 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=archivers&portname=ruby-lha portname: audio/aureal-kmod broken because: does not build build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audio&portname=aureal-kmod portname: audio/mp3splt-gtk broken because: Fails to configure build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audio&portname=mp3splt-gtk portname: audio/padevchooser broken because: needs update to support pulseaudio 5.0 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audio&portname=padevchooser portname: audio/raproxy broken because: Unfetchable build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audio&portname=raproxy portname: audio/xmms-openspc broken because: does not build on FreeBSD 10.x and later build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=audio&portname=xmms-openspc portname: biology/platon broken because: Unfetchable build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=biology&portname=platon portname: biology/tinker broken because: Checksum and size mismatch build errors: http://beefy1.isc.freebsd.org/bulk/93i386-RELENG_9_3/latest/logs/errors/tinker-6.2.06_4.log overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=biology&portname=tinker portname: cad/cider broken because: Will not build with bmake and USES=fmake will not solve the issue build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=cad&portname=cider portname: databases/gtksql broken because: Fails to configure build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databases&portname=gtksql portname: databases/mariadb-client broken because: Does not build under FreeBSD 10 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databases&portname=mariadb-client portname: databases/mariadb-server broken because: Does not build under FreeBSD 10 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databases&portname=mariadb-server portname: databases/py-fdb broken because: Does not compile on FreeBSD 9 i386 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databases&portname=py-fdb portname: databases/pydbdesigner broken because: Needs an unsupported version of wxWidgets build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databases&portname=pydbdesigner portname: databases/tora broken because: Does not compile with clang (include ) build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databases&portname=tora portname: deskutils/deskbar-applet broken because: Uses unknown GNOME components pygnomedesktop and evolutiondataserver build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=deskutils&portname=deskbar-applet portname: deskutils/gimmie broken because: Uses unknown GNOME components pygnomedesktop and pygnomeextras build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=deskutils&portname=gimmie portname: deskutils/glipper broken because: Uses unknown GNOME components pygnomedesktop and pygnomeextras build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=deskutils&portname=glipper portname: deskutils/gnochm broken because: Uses unknown GNOME component pygnomeextras build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=deskutils&portname=gnochm portname: deskutils/hamster-applet broken because: Uses unknown GNOME components pygnomedesktop and gnomecontrolcenter2 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=deskutils&portname=hamster-applet portname: deskutils/kupfer broken because: Uses unknown GNOME component pygnomedesktop build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=deskutils&portname=kupfer portname: deskutils/ontv broken because: Uses unknown GNOME components pygnomedesktop and pygnomeextras build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=deskutils&portname=ontv portname: deskutils/timer-applet broken because: Uses unknown GNOME component pygnomedesktop build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=deskutils&portname=timer-applet portname: devel/frama-c broken because: Fails to build with ocamlgraph 1.8.6 build errors: http://beefy2.isc.freebsd.org/bulk/83amd64-default/latest/logs/errors/frama-c-20120901.log ((not currently populated)) overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=frama-c portname: devel/lua-gettext broken because: doesn't fetch build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=lua-gettext portname: devel/lua-pty broken because: doesn't fetch build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=lua-pty portname: devel/p5-Cdk broken because: Does not build with Perl 5.18 or above build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=p5-Cdk portname: devel/rubygem-igraph broken because: does not build with igraph-0.7.1 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=rubygem-igraph portname: devel/rubygem-rcov broken because: Does not work with Ruby 2.x build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=rubygem-rcov portname: devel/xtla broken because: Fails to package build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=xtla portname: editors/scribes broken because: Uses unknown GNOME component pygnomeextras build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=editors&portname=scribes portname: emulators/kqemu-kmod broken because: KPI changes in 10 and up, use bhyve or vbox build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=emulators&portname=kqemu-kmod portname: emulators/linux_base-gentoo-stage3 broken because: Fails to package build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=emulators&portname=linux_base-gentoo-stage3 portname: emulators/linux_dist-gentoo-stage3 broken because: Fails to package build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=emulators&portname=linux_dist-gentoo-stage3 portname: finance/openerp-server broken because: Non-functional as shipped (Operational Error)(PR: 186262) build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=finance&portname=openerp-server portname: games/gtkradiant broken because: Does not support modern png build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=games&portname=gtkradiant portname: games/linux-candycruncher-demo broken because: Does not fetch build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=games&portname=linux-candycruncher-demo portname: games/linux-coldwar-demo broken because: Does not fetch build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=games&portname=linux-coldwar-demo portname: games/linux-gorky17-demo broken because: Does not fetch build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=games&portname=linux-gorky17-demo portname: games/linux-hdb-demo broken because: Does not fetch build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=games&portname=linux-hdb-demo portname: games/linux-majesty-demo broken because: Does not fetch build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=games&portname=linux-majesty-demo portname: games/py-pychess broken because: Uses unknown GNOME component pygnomedesktop build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=games&portname=py-pychess portname: games/spring broken because: Fails to build build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=games&portname=spring portname: games/wmfortune broken because: No public disfiles build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=games&portname=wmfortune portname: graphics/gnash broken because: unable to link in libboost_system build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=gnash portname: graphics/kuickshow-kde4 broken because: depends on imlib build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=kuickshow-kde4 portname: graphics/opengtl broken because: Depends on deleted devel/llvm32 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=opengtl portname: graphics/p5-Geo-KML broken because: Upstream disabled support for textproc/p5-XML-Compile > 1.43 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=p5-Geo-KML portname: graphics/p5-Image-Scale broken because: Uses undocumented giflib API build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=p5-Image-Scale portname: graphics/sng broken because: Does not support modern png build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=sng portname: graphics/xfpovray broken because: Fails to link build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=xfpovray portname: japanese/netype broken because: depends on imlib build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=japanese&portname=netype portname: japanese/p5-Text-MeCab broken because: Does not build with Perl 5.18 or above build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=japanese&portname=p5-Text-MeCab portname: lang/ecl broken because: Fails to link with new libgc build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=lang&portname=ecl portname: lang/pure broken because: Depends on deleted devel/llvm32 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=lang&portname=pure portname: mail/mail-notification broken because: Run-time failure with Gnome 3 build errors: http://beefy1.isc.freebsd.org/bulk/93i386-RELENG_9_3/latest/logs/errors/mail-notification-5.4_11.log overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=mail&portname=mail-notification portname: mail/maildirsync broken because: Does not build with Perl 5.18 or above build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=mail&portname=maildirsync portname: mail/p5-MIME-Fast broken because: Does not build with Perl 5.18 or above build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=mail&portname=p5-MIME-Fast portname: mail/qar-bufo broken because: Does not build with Perl 5.18 or above build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=mail&portname=qar-bufo portname: math/isabelle broken because: Build seems to hang on the package builders build errors: http://beefy1.isc.freebsd.org/bulk/83i386-default/latest/logs/errors/isabelle-2009.2.log ((not currently populated)) overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=math&portname=isabelle portname: math/ruby-numru_units broken because: Does not build with Ruby 2.0 or newer build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=math&portname=ruby-numru_units portname: multimedia/arista broken because: Uses unknown GNOME component pygnomedesktop build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=multimedia&portname=arista portname: multimedia/bombono broken because: does not build on 10.x+ build errors: http://beefy2.isc.freebsd.org/bulk/101amd64-RELENG_10_1/latest/logs/errors/bombono-1.2.2_5.log overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=multimedia&portname=bombono portname: multimedia/subtitleeditor broken because: Does not compile on FreeBSD 10.0 and later build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=multimedia&portname=subtitleeditor portname: net-im/skype4 broken because: Skype 4.3 is missing several Linux syscalls. build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=net-im&portname=skype4 portname: net-mgmt/netxms broken because: Fails to package build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=net-mgmt&portname=netxms portname: net-mgmt/tcptrack broken because: binary segfaults build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=net-mgmt&portname=tcptrack portname: net/cyphesis broken because: Does not compile on FreeBSD 10+ build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=net&portname=cyphesis portname: net/gpxe broken because: does not build on FreeBSD 10.x and later build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=net&portname=gpxe portname: net/nocatsplash broken because: Broken pkg-install script, should use USERS and UIDs build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=net&portname=nocatsplash portname: net/openospfd broken because: requires old CARP implementation (interface layer) build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=net&portname=openospfd portname: net/service-discovery-applet broken because: Uses unknown GNOME component pygnomedesktop build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=net&portname=service-discovery-applet portname: net/spserver broken because: Misuse libevent API build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=net&portname=spserver portname: ports-mgmt/gnome-packagekit broken because: Uses unknown GNOME component gnomemenus build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=ports-mgmt&portname=gnome-packagekit portname: print/ghostscript7 broken because: Does not support modern png build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=print&portname=ghostscript7 portname: print/ghostscript7-nox11 broken because: Does not support modern png build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=print&portname=ghostscript7-nox11 portname: print/gnome-specimen broken because: Uses unknown GNOME component pygnomedesktop build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=print&portname=gnome-specimen portname: print/sgf2tex broken because: Fails to build build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=print&portname=sgf2tex portname: science/meep broken because: Depends on conflicting guile and guile2 (via libctl) build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=science&portname=meep portname: science/py-scimath broken because: Fails to build build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=science&portname=py-scimath portname: security/arirang broken because: Does not build with Ruby 2.0 or newer build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=security&portname=arirang portname: security/p5-Crypt-GOST broken because: Does not build with Perl 5.18 or above build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=security&portname=p5-Crypt-GOST portname: security/p5-Crypt-TEA broken because: Does not build with Perl 5.18 or above build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=security&portname=p5-Crypt-TEA portname: sysutils/pesign broken because: This port requires ppoll(2) system call build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=sysutils&portname=pesign portname: sysutils/puppet27 broken because: Does not work with Ruby 2.0 or Ruby 2.1 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=sysutils&portname=puppet27 portname: sysutils/py-salt-api broken because: Conflicts with py27-salt-2014.7.0 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=sysutils&portname=py-salt-api portname: textproc/aiksaurus-gtk broken because: does not link against GTK2 on FreeBSD 10+ build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=textproc&portname=aiksaurus-gtk portname: textproc/pecl-cld broken because: Missing headers with cld 20150113 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=textproc&portname=pecl-cld portname: textproc/refdb broken because: Fails to link build errors: http://beefy2.isc.freebsd.org/bulk/101amd64-RELENG_10_1/latest/logs/errors/refdb-0.9.9_7.log overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=textproc&portname=refdb portname: www/diamanda broken because: Does not work with current django build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=www&portname=diamanda portname: www/mod_cplusplus broken because: does not build with new clang build errors: http://beefy2.isc.freebsd.org/bulk/101amd64-RELENG_10_1/latest/logs/errors/ap22-mod_cplusplus-1.5.4_3.log overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=www&portname=mod_cplusplus From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 08:28:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A475D3E0 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org (portsmon.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9575A9B9 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.104]) by portsmon.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t178SKTv080844 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:20 GMT (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:20 GMT Message-Id: <201502070828.t178SKTv080844@portsmon.freebsd.org> From: linimon@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Reply-To: portmgr-feedback@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:28:20 -0000 As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on the existing port. In some cases, ports are marked for removal because they fail to build and install correctly from their sources, or otherwise fail in operation. The ports, and the reason and date that they have been scheduled for removal, are listed below. If no one has stepped forward before that time to propose a way to fix the problems (such as via a PR), the ports will be deleted. portname: net/xrdesktop description: GTK frontend to rdesktop maintainer: ports@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: Unmaintained upstream - please use net/xrdesktop2 instead expiration date: 2015-02-28 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=net&portname=xrdesktop portname: www/squid33 description: HTTP Caching Proxy maintainer: ports@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: Reached EOL on 28 August 2014, use www/squid (v3.4) instead expiration date: 2015-05-31 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=www&portname=squid33 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 08:28:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85496400 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org (portsmon.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E0B19BE for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.104]) by portsmon.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t178SNPk081111 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:23 GMT (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:23 GMT Message-Id: <201502070828.t178SNPk081111@portsmon.freebsd.org> From: linimon@FreeBSD.org To: ports@FreeBSD.org Reply-To: portmgr-feedback@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD ports which are currently marked forbidden X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:28:23 -0000 As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about ports that are marked as "forbidden" in their Makefiles. Often, these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known exploits. An overview of each port, including errors seen on the build farm, is included below. portname: x11/nvidia-driver-173 forbidden because: vulnerable to denial of service or arbitrary code execution (CVE-2014-8298) build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=x11&portname=nvidia-driver-173 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 08:28:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9080C3E6 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org (portsmon.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72E339BD for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmon.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.104]) by portsmon.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t178SLdL081076 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:21 GMT (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:28:21 GMT Message-Id: <201502070828.t178SLdL081076@portsmon.freebsd.org> From: linimon@FreeBSD.org To: ports@FreeBSD.org Reply-To: portmgr-feedback@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:28:21 -0000 As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on the existing port. In some cases, ports are marked for removal because they fail to build and install correctly from their sources, or otherwise fail in operation. The ports, and the reason and date that they have been scheduled for removal, are listed below. If no one has stepped forward before that time to propose a way to fix the problems (such as via a PR), the ports will be deleted. portname: databases/db48 description: The Berkeley DB package, revision 4.8 maintainer: mandree@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: Please migrate to db5 or db6 expiration date: 2015-02-28 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=databases&portname=db48 portname: devel/ocaml-equeue description: The Equeue library for OCaml maintainer: michipili@gmail.com deprecated because: Superseded by www/ocaml-net expiration date: 2015-08-20 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=ocaml-equeue portname: devel/subversion16 description: Version control system maintainer: lev@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: unsupported since 2013-06-18, missing CVE fixes expiration date: 2015-03-31 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=devel&portname=subversion16 portname: dns/bind10 description: Development version of ISC BIND 10 DNS Suite maintainer: mat@FreeBSD.org status: IGNORE deprecated because: Is not developed any more, use dns/bundy expiration date: 2015-12-31 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=dns&portname=bind10 portname: dns/maradns1 description: DNS server with focus on security and simplicity maintainer: mat@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: MaraDNS 1 end-of-life: June 21, 2015, use dns/maradns expiration date: 2015-06-21 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=dns&portname=maradns1 portname: finance/openerp-server description: Open source application ERP & CRM in Python using Postgresql maintainer: pakhom706@gmail.com status: BROKEN deprecated because: Broken for more than 6 months expiration date: 2015-02-28 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=finance&portname=openerp-server portname: graphics/p5-Geo-KML description: Perl Module to Create Google Earth KML/KMZ maintainer: perl@FreeBSD.org status: BROKEN deprecated because: expiration date: 2015-02-28 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=graphics&portname=p5-Geo-KML portname: lang/perl5.16 description: Practical Extraction and Report Language maintainer: perl@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: Unsupported, please upgrade to a more recent version of Perl expiration date: 2015-07-31 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=lang&portname=perl5.16 portname: lang/ruby19 description: Object-oriented interpreted scripting language maintainer: ruby@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: Upstream support ends February 23, 2015 expiration date: 2015-02-23 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=lang&portname=ruby19 portname: math/isabelle description: Generic proof assistant maintainer: beyert@cs.ucr.edu status: BROKEN deprecated because: Broken for more than 6 months expiration date: 2015-02-28 build errors: http://beefy1.isc.freebsd.org/bulk/83i386-default/latest/logs/errors/isabelle-2009.2.log ((not currently populated)) overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=math&portname=isabelle portname: net/spserver description: TCP server framework library written in C++ based on libevent maintainer: vanilla@FreeBSD.org status: BROKEN deprecated because: Broken for more than 6 months expiration date: 2015-02-28 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=net&portname=spserver portname: net/xrdesktop description: GTK frontend to rdesktop maintainer: ports@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: Unmaintained upstream - please use net/xrdesktop2 instead expiration date: 2015-02-28 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=net&portname=xrdesktop portname: ports-mgmt/portbuilder description: Concurrent FreeBSD port builder maintainer: dbn@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: Unmaintained, please use ports-mgmt/poudriere. expiration date: 2015-03-31 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=ports-mgmt&portname=portbuilder portname: ports-mgmt/porteasy description: Tool for fetching and building ports maintainer: des@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: Does not support pkgng expiration date: 2015-02-28 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=ports-mgmt&portname=porteasy portname: sysutils/rsyslog7-devel description: Syslogd supporting SQL, TCP, and TLS maintainer: brd@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: EoL, use sysutils/rsyslog8 expiration date: 2015-02-13 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=sysutils&portname=rsyslog7-devel portname: sysutils/rsyslog8-devel description: Syslogd supporting SQL, TCP, and TLS maintainer: brd@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: EoL, use sysutils/rsyslog8 expiration date: 2015-02-13 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=sysutils&portname=rsyslog8-devel portname: www/mediawiki122 description: The wiki engine used by Wikipedia maintainer: wen@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: Deprecated by upstream, use www/mediawiki12{3,4} instead expiration date: 2015-02-28 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=www&portname=mediawiki122 portname: www/mod_cplusplus description: Apache module for loading C++ objects as handlers maintainer: apache@FreeBSD.org status: BROKEN deprecated because: written for apache 2.0, no longer maintained upstream expiration date: 2015-02-28 build errors: http://beefy2.isc.freebsd.org/bulk/101amd64-RELENG_10_1/latest/logs/errors/ap22-mod_cplusplus-1.5.4_3.log overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=www&portname=mod_cplusplus portname: www/moodle26 description: Course management system based on social constructionism maintainer: wen@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: Deprecated by upstream, use www/moodle2{7,8} instead expiration date: 2015-04-17 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=www&portname=moodle26 portname: www/py-django15 description: High-level Python Web framework maintainer: lwhsu@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: not supported by upstream expiration date: 2015-02-28 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=www&portname=py-django15 portname: www/squid33 description: HTTP Caching Proxy maintainer: ports@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: Reached EOL on 28 August 2014, use www/squid (v3.4) instead expiration date: 2015-05-31 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=www&portname=squid33 portname: www/typo345 description: The typo3 content management system maintainer: freebsd-ports@charlieroot.de deprecated because: Upgrade to www/typo3 or www/typo3-lts expiration date: 2015-03-31 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=www&portname=typo345 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 08:45:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3680A89; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90409BD5; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from u10-2-32-011.office.norse-data.com (unknown [50.204.88.51]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFC9D341F8AC; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 00:45:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54D5D0D4.8030907@freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 00:46:12 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mathieu Arnold , Doug Barton Subject: Re: BIND REPLACE_BASE option References: <54AF4E89.20308@dougbarton.us> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:45:34 -0000 On 1/9/15 5:42 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +--On 8 janvier 2015 19:44:09 -0800 Doug Barton wrote: > | Can you please explain why this option was removed? It's been in the > | ports for over 13 years, and lots of users utilized it. > | > | I realize that BIND is no longer in the base in 10.x, but that would > | be a reason to make the option conditional, to continue to support the > | substantial user base that is still on 8.x and 9.x. > > I only removed it from bind99, it was never there in bind910. I removed it > because it was a poor design idea to begin with, and it was making the port > harder to maintain. Also, it was overwriting files in the base system, > which is a thing we do not want to do. > > All you need to do is add: > > named_program="/usr/local/sbin/named" > > to your rc.conf, like the message says when you install the port. > > It was a bit like the /usr/bin/perl symlink, it was time for it to go. > And on the 8395th day the ports team looked at the OS and declared it clean, and it was without users and their cumbersome legacy requirements and they rejoiced for now they could do all they needed any wanted. And it was implemented in shell, C, and make just like the first day and no one was bothered by change, except the users. And there was some rejoicing (not too much as honestly most of the users left) and it was good. -Alfred From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 08:56:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21B96DCA for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:56:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7507CB5 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:56:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from worm.infracaninophle.co.uk (worm.infracaninophle.co.uk [81.2.117.101] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t178ugUq034981 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:56:43 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t178ugUq034981 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t178ugUq034981; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral Message-ID: <54D5D34C.20302@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:56:44 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is NO_PKG_REGISTER still supposed to work? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:56:55 -0000 On 2015/02/07 01:31, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > From bsd.port.mk: > > # NO_PKG_REGISTER > # - Don't register a port installation as a package. > > However, testing this with a port results in the port installation > performing the staging part only and the final installation from the > stage directory on to the system being skipped when NO_PKG_REGISTER is > set. Is this still supposed to work? I doubt it. pkg(8) doesn't have the capability to install a package without updating the package database. Plus why would you even want to do that nowadays? As I recall NO_PKG_REGISTER was a work-around for not having staging or tools like poudriere where you can build a package without scribbling on your live system. Cheers, Matthew From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 09:31:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC9834AA for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:31:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8CE0F42 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:31:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t179VYKx004116 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:31:34 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t179VYlY004113; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:31:34 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201502070931.t179VYlY004113@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:31:34 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 09:31:35 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/jasperreports | 5.5.2 | 6.0.3 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/bglibs | 1.106 | 2.03 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 09:33:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F8BE5B1; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.pingpong.net (mail2.pingpong.net [79.136.116.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08BF8FDF; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:33:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.10] (h-85-24-195-48.na.cust.bahnhof.se [85.24.195.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99E3951F8; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 10:33:48 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: postgresql93 port and libedit From: Palle Girgensohn X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B466) In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 10:33:48 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20150115160113.GE98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150117004151.GO98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <171ED59D-E445-4605-B72C-E9ED8A74CA28@pingpong.net> <20150117140935.GQ98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150117145425.GR98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> To: Waitman Gobble Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , "pgsql@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 09:33:58 -0000 Hello, I switched to Libedit with the latest release, and it appears that some colo= ur code support is missing from Libedit. Any of you know or have ideas how t= o fix this? Is it just not implemented yet in Libedit? I cod of course add a= n option to build with readline, but I am more inclined to just switch back r= ather than having one more option/complication in the port. So could you ple= ase advice, is there a way to make this user happy using Libedit? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197362 Palle > 17 jan 2015 kl. 16:08 skrev Waitman Gobble : >=20 >> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 7:00 AM, Waitman Gobble wro= te: >>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:54 AM, Baptiste Daroussin w= rote: >>>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 06:38:10AM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>>>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Baptiste Daroussin = wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 10:37:49AM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> 17 jan 2015 kl. 01:41 skrev Baptiste Daroussin : >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 08:02:22PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:27:14PM -0800, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> I noticed that postgresql93-client port pulls in readline, which i= s GPLv3. >>>>>>>>>> When I get rid of readline in Makefile 'USES' and also change the= >>>>>>>>>> bottom of the Makefile in postgresql93-server, >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> ... >>>>>>>>>> .include "${.CURDIR}/../postgresql92-server/Makefile" >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> CONFIGURE_ARGS+=3D--with-libedit-preferred >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>>> It builds without readline and links against libedit in base: >>>>>>>>> except that libedit is not really an alternative as it does not su= pprot unicode >>>>>>>>> (except in head) one solution would be to try linking against the e= ditline port >>>>>>>>> which contains the same fixes as libedit in head and see if it wor= ks. >>>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>> Bapt >>>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>>> Thanks so much for the feedback. I've considered the options regard= ing >>>>>>>> my project and I think it's more work to handle end-user devices wi= th >>>>>>>> a pkg repository if I indeed must manage custom ports built using >>>>>>>> customized sources. Distributing the initial appliance isn't the >>>>>>>> problem, i'm working out an update strategy for down the road. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> https://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/pglibedit.diff >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> This patch works for me and accepts perfectly unicode. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Can anyone from the postgresql team test, generalize to other posteg= resql >>>>>>> versions? (please keep it using the port version of libedit). >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>> Bapt >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Looks like a reasonable patch. I have a hard time finding the differe= nces between readine and ilbedit. It aims at 100% API compatibility. How goo= d is libedit? If it degrades functionality compared to readline it should re= ally be an option, but I agree, lesser options are preferred. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> Palle >>>>> It is not 100% compatible but I think it implements all pgsql requirem= ents, only >>>>> the version in ports and he head handle correctly unicode. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Some of the default settings are a bit different most ^W but that can b= e changed >>>>> via .editrc >>>>>=20 >>>>> mysql has tips about the differences: >>>>> https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17952_01/refman-5.6-en/mysql-tips.html >>>>>=20 >>>>> =46rom what I can read in the code psql only uses compatible interface= s. >>>>>=20 >>>>> As the one who have done the latet updates on libedit both base and po= rts, I >>>>> would recommand to only use the version from ports on all version of Fre= eBSD as >>>>> I can add quick fixes if needed. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Once I'm sure the libedit in base is good enough everywhere we would b= e able to >>>>> switch on the base version if people prefers to avoid an external dep.= >>>>>=20 >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Bapt >>>>=20 >>>> Looks great. The patch looks fine, however there is an issue that the >>>> configure script in postgresql93 src still needs readline. If readline >>>> is already on the machine then it builds fine, however if it is not >>>> then the build fails. adding 'readline' back into USES will fix that >>>> problem, and the resulting client is still linked to libedit and not >>>> readline.. however the pkg will show a dependency on readline and pull >>>> that in. The configure script is based on having readline, if you use >>>> the --without-readline switch it won't even use libedit, however if >>>> you use --with-libedit-preferred it will check for readline and then >>>> switch the library linking order from 'readline libedit' to 'libedit >>>> readline'. >>>>=20 >>>> I think the configure script for postgresql needs some rework so that >>>> it only uses libedit, and the option would be --with-readline or >>>> --with-libedit. >>>>=20 >>>> if 'readline' is removed from the Makefile (and readline is already >>>> installed on the machine) then the package will build fine without the >>>> dependency on readline. It's kind of a tricky predicament that it >>>> needs it but not really. >>>>=20 >>>> As far as a port, I'm not sure how to 'optionally' replace the >>>> configure script with what is in 'files' if the libedit option is >>>> selected. I'm sure there is an example in the ports tree, just haven't >>>> yet taken the time to check. >>>=20 >>> I have no readline installed and I can see: >>> checking for rl_completion_append_character... no >>> checking for rl_completion_matches... yes >>> checking for rl_filename_completion_function... yes >>> checking for append_history... no >>> checking for history_truncate_file... yes >>>=20 >>> Which is what I was expected. >>>=20 >>> With libedit-prefered it checks: >>> READLINE_ORDER=3D"-ledit -lreadline" >>>=20 >>> So from what I can see everything ok :) >>>=20 >>> Bapt >>=20 >>=20 >> Hmmm, I'll check again. The build was failing for me using poudriere. >> it looks to me like the configure script checks for readline existence >> and the with-libedit-preferred check block is inside the readline >> check block.. >>=20 >> -- >> Waitman Gobble >> Los Altos California USA >> 510-830-7975 >=20 > ... I think that's why '--without-readline' option help reads 'without > readline AND libedit' >=20 > --=20 > Waitman Gobble > Los Altos California USA > 510-830-7975 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 09:38:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8422B6B1 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com (mail-wg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18990E for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id y19so17740419wgg.11 for ; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 01:38:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AoXuJdXqGIM7u9MZkl0advbQdqfkchRwb/WEiJxbz6g=; b=wIoq2ILZwTxZ//8RKAp08fR5VbJZnjqbrBSxJfPspoNzkZ20SpQi+SB/TrQBII7rX8 cEY+hssd0axjHsMkG7plVeY9T1ptV23QBC1ynDpv7J2MaiEyqDeLdHu2tABigGomdJaK L3B5+Wulw+IR4j/03KHe9H7sBuQ8nbhHnKzWBhXTxw4OHot5qgOjp8dH4VaFnVixJ0lY 8DS35mQW1abDBSYL3LAst31PYkNVcZf3aKDDpAMhrMJ+ZwGV0BptISoSG4CUhJ2XB2J4 TD68KM16XOcY0ROOD2lyri8z9mWcuytAmoMhHsLYAhVc4Fn77HLLfTDknlIBq8mVWOme zX/A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.80.67 with SMTP id p3mr4775378wix.55.1423301914595; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 01:38:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.27.210.200 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 01:38:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <89510189ec45d18c41eb40e03420a429.squirrel@mx.waitman.net> References: <89510189ec45d18c41eb40e03420a429.squirrel@mx.waitman.net> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 01:38:34 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: poudriere and astro/gpsd From: Waitman Gobble To: Waitman Gobble Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 09:38:37 -0000 On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote= : > > Hi, > > Is there a solution for this problem? > > #poudriere bulk -j 11armv632 -p local -f build-rpi-b-gpsd.ports > > [00:00:28] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Starting jail 11armv632-local > [00:00:28] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Creating user/group nobodyjexec: execvp(): pw: = Exec > format error > [00:00:28] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Error: Unable to create group nobody > > Thank you, > > -- > Waitman Gobble > Los Altos California USA > +1.510-830-7975 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" So I didn't have luck building astro/gpsd in poudriere. I made a BSD Makefile and ripped out all the Python, scons stuff. And I just wasn't getting excited at all about a scons/python build on a Raspberry Pi :) IF someone wants to try.. https://github.com/waitman/gpsd-release-3.11-mod it's bare-bones no configure. Edit Makefile to set prefix other than /usr/l= ocal/ these are supported: make, make install, make deinstall, make clean builds with clang in base. tested on a pi: # uname -a FreeBSD ARTiming150102 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r277133: Tue Jan 13 20:18:52 PST 2015 waitman@rpidev.waitman.net:/usr/home/waitman/crochet-freebsd/work/obj/arm.a= rmv6/usr/src/sys/TMRDEV arm tested with a USGlobalSat BU-353-S4 GPS device # gpsd -n /dev/ttyU0 # gpspipe -w -n 10 {"class":"VERSION","release":"3.11","rev":"3.11","proto_major":3,"proto_min= or":9} {"class":"DEVICES","devices":[{"class":"DEVICE","path":"/dev/ttyU0","driver= ":"SiRF","subtype":"?\u0006GSD4e_4.1.2-P1_RPATCH.03-GNC03-F-GPS-4R-1304034 04/09/2013 10","activated":"2015-02-07T09:27:03.511Z","flags":1,"native":1,= "bps":4800,"parity":"N","stopbits":1,"cycle":1.00}]} {"class":"WATCH","enable":true,"json":true,"nmea":false,"raw":0,"scaled":fa= lse,"timing":false,"split24":false,"pps":false} {"class":"SKY","tag":"MID4","device":"/dev/ttyU0","time":"2015-02-07T09:27:= 04.000Z","xdop":5.26,"ydop":2.53,"vdop":8.93,"tdop":8.93,"hdop":2.00,"gdop"= :13.91,"pdop":10.67,"satellites":[{"PRN":2,"el":81,"az":99,"ss":27,"used":t= rue},{"PRN":10,"el":27,"az":93,"ss":19,"used":true},{"PRN":6,"el":38,"az":4= 6,"ss":24,"used":true},{"PRN":12,"el":73,"az":336,"ss":27,"used":true},{"PR= N":24,"el":37,"az":217,"ss":18,"used":true},{"PRN":5,"el":16,"az":153,"ss":= 22,"used":true},{"PRN":29,"el":19,"az":271,"ss":0,"used":false},{"PRN":25,"= el":33,"az":313,"ss":11,"used":false},{"PRN":20,"el":18,"az":55,"ss":0,"use= d":false},{"PRN":17,"el":3,"az":75,"ss":0,"used":false},{"PRN":138,"el":44,= "az":156,"ss":0,"used":false}]} {"class":"TPV","tag":"MID2","device":"/dev/ttyU0","mode":3,"time":"2015-02-= 07T09:27:04.000Z","ept":0.005,"lat":37.360836008,"lon":-122.104876271,"alt"= :85.829,"epx":78.948,"epy":37.880,"epv":205.329,"track":37.1664,"speed":0.1= 75,"climb":0.023,"eps":157.90,"epc":410.66} {"class":"TPV","tag":"MID2","device":"/dev/ttyU0","mode":3,"time":"2015-02-= 07T09:27:05.000Z","ept":0.005,"lat":37.360836008,"lon":-122.104876271,"alt"= :85.829,"epx":78.948,"epy":37.880,"epv":205.329,"track":314.0445,"speed":0.= 092,"climb":-0.084,"eps":157.90,"epc":410.66} {"class":"TPV","tag":"MID2","device":"/dev/ttyU0","mode":3,"time":"2015-02-= 07T09:27:06.000Z","ept":0.005,"lat":37.360843169,"lon":-122.104876271,"alt"= :86.436,"epx":78.948,"epy":37.880,"epv":205.329,"track":337.9001,"speed":0.= 177,"climb":-0.008,"eps":157.90,"epc":410.66} {"class":"SKY","tag":"MID4","device":"/dev/ttyU0","time":"2015-02-07T09:27:= 07.000Z","xdop":5.26,"ydop":2.53,"vdop":8.93,"tdop":8.93,"hdop":2.00,"gdop"= :13.91,"pdop":10.67,"satellites":[{"PRN":2,"el":81,"az":99,"ss":27,"used":t= rue},{"PRN":10,"el":27,"az":93,"ss":20,"used":true},{"PRN":6,"el":38,"az":4= 6,"ss":25,"used":true},{"PRN":12,"el":73,"az":336,"ss":27,"used":true},{"PR= N":24,"el":37,"az":217,"ss":18,"used":true},{"PRN":5,"el":16,"az":153,"ss":= 22,"used":true},{"PRN":29,"el":19,"az":271,"ss":0,"used":false},{"PRN":25,"= el":33,"az":313,"ss":12,"used":false},{"PRN":20,"el":18,"az":55,"ss":0,"use= d":false},{"PRN":17,"el":3,"az":75,"ss":0,"used":false},{"PRN":138,"el":44,= "az":156,"ss":0,"used":false}]} {"class":"TPV","tag":"MID2","device":"/dev/ttyU0","mode":3,"time":"2015-02-= 07T09:27:07.000Z","ept":0.005,"lat":37.360847801,"lon":-122.104882270,"alt"= :85.762,"epx":78.948,"epy":37.880,"epv":205.329,"track":37.1664,"speed":0.1= 75,"climb":0.023,"eps":157.90,"epc":410.66} {"class":"TPV","tag":"MID2","device":"/dev/ttyU0","mode":3,"time":"2015-02-= 07T09:27:08.000Z","ept":0.005,"lat":37.360847801,"lon":-122.104882270,"alt"= :85.762,"epx":78.948,"epy":37.880,"epv":205.329,"track":69.1563,"speed":0.1= 13,"climb":-0.053,"eps":157.90,"epc":410.66} It's definitely a CPU cooker on the Pi. I need to take a look at strategies for minimizing resource utilization. --=20 Waitman Gobble Los Altos California USA 510-830-7975 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 10:14:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51874C84 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 10:14:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3C5D5E4 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 10:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id hi2so1994121wib.1 for ; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 02:14:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=M+ekE7TYtqUuW++uuFY9vltD37ZUm1GAm84VvPTSCzc=; b=pz9y8YUJbopeYSm1TX+0d8/oPVCgZXpOPexmPShQ1nDnz3sgqY/pvUlxk5j4Ul+p9w JXIAYPE+DVDjXKqibPZE8s1YNB2P52FLgAAP94pVsq15oDCDJTwSNph2SUS+HG+FA9m7 V+eYFASu+RxrM7+5xywbyHfvhuHBBb3/cH3Uv6V01OqFTgFjoI6lAmflt8b3+2yY+M1+ hatqxwwBwIW0C7YIxkmwNPyjdnBFWnTb6AANVtD91I3BMB82do/ZniyjZaglOGMjAc+Z jRZLEoesUWZnVR0vbUgDCtrgGJFqNPgkWZ4OY5kFNQa3iuUhI+OMIxMvOnaazvYQF50d zCpg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.103.170 with SMTP id fx10mr12341464wib.24.1423304057288; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 02:14:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.81.1 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 02:14:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.81.1 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 02:14:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150207071940.GV44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150206203818.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150207071940.GV44537@home.opsec.eu> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 11:14:17 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hotfix and unbreak update that need to be commited From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= To: Kurt Jaeger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 10:14:19 -0000 El 07/02/2015 08:19, "Kurt Jaeger" escribi=C3=B3: > > Hi! > > > > > And if the commiter is kind enough to take care of > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197135 that updates > > > > > > Done. > > jbeich suggests in > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/2015-February/084775.html > > that you improve the patch using SRC_BASE and test if SRC_BASE > is available. Can you submit this and send me the PR ? I'll get it committed. > I'm away from my computer for some time, but I'll do it and cone back to you soon. Cheers > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 11:27:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA00B5BD; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 11:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com (mail-we0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31238C31; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 11:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id w62so811608wes.9; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 03:27:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ek0jskAXAT9a4eQM9jzqY8VtfQH7vwmgOIDWOUPfRCY=; b=GraiCxJFsnCL6Qyvr+QX2eFFG39wxmuaLY0QGhXrEhmUDalaHycjPDDkyaZYrffUil +m4WSGGyrFt3n3vyhxEzFGO5GPsI7fi/CAxH82kOM3r6OnajOfx7K3XF1RgBahWEL/Yx 11vJW9LAU+oY3UIYkXk+GdVpSfyRvUfo5cxa8AO0ZqI9EDm90YGkACrFof0SI/lCqXDT JaUG8QMCP7jsZL1MDb6aTJ/ZYpSy74ATdOIN+NAZwiF07mGuudPGbydBWzcniWjm/o86 WY2OVzF7FRTIQmI3EBLaqRFmQq6AkJV1uZt+KLEPgP1ip3nmiVnfBGlNUxOOBI1bulDA GNWQ== X-Received: by 10.180.79.106 with SMTP id i10mr5298156wix.35.1423308465591; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 03:27:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bv6sm7212877wjb.30.2015.02.07.03.27.44 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 07 Feb 2015 03:27:44 -0800 (PST) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 12:27:42 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Palle Girgensohn Subject: Re: postgresql93 port and libedit Message-ID: <20150207112742.GA7344@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150115160113.GE98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150117004151.GO98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <171ED59D-E445-4605-B72C-E9ED8A74CA28@pingpong.net> <20150117140935.GQ98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150117145425.GR98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "pgsql@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , Waitman Gobble X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:27:47 -0000 --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 10:33:48AM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I switched to Libedit with the latest release, and it appears that some c= olour code support is missing from Libedit. Any of you know or have ideas h= ow to fix this? Is it just not implemented yet in Libedit? I cod of course = add an option to build with readline, but I am more inclined to just switch= back rather than having one more option/complication in the port. So could= you please advice, is there a way to make this user happy using Libedit? >=20 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197362 >=20 > Palle >=20 I'll have a look asap. Best regards, Bapt --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlTV9q4ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyUsgCfU82ZbREahiQAS0GdkCJ/kBDH OmMAn03puMuN0xJgCAuyqxY9WE1mmXv7 =/CpO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9jxsPFA5p3P2qPhR-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 11:38:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2B8A6CA for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 11:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C560CFB for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 11:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YK3iY-0006uc-Hv; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 12:38:30 +0100 Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 12:38:30 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Fernando =?iso-8859-1?Q?Apestegu=EDa?= , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Hotfix and unbreak update that need to be commited Message-ID: <20150207113830.GW44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150206203818.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150206203818.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:38:33 -0000 Hi! > > Could any commiter take care of > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197378 > > that updates devel/visualparadigm with a hotfix just released by the > > upstream project? > > I'm testing it right now. It's committed. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 12:52:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9E425EE; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 12:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x22d.google.com (mail-qc0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77B205FA; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 12:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id m20so16044646qcx.4; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 04:52:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=6QF+99qj3W/uS4/BSeVjTDKiqqhbPv5i1yRNvOA8mE4=; b=beWOTKmCLdDrsa9Y/9O7Z1+iukcULUqUGamMpXigs6v4bJvXzcSNJkZbcZMuWYGd1t cqhioJG1gQsUGOLCzHdGgcU3wbTjr6MtBFdvoN21a31X1ZT6jBukjkbBOFnWaRiSn5mZ x+PjMsZxeLaA2ombnwzYMufc1bpHcxKDFiTNZ1RwPNMDpP8ppJVJMS8wORxYcRB+wE0F hmGR6hmeBSoAnGmHWqmYtLQU1JBictGSLhBPoQh2hWYSzo35+oCHe6f2zZSylpVlp8LH lSzNlqk5QMGz42ujUMFXxDT1U9G+OUAP/HCM3rcLwgicxIwtgcghKZF2SvBTCCBGsGQe rVvg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.38.114 with SMTP id s105mr18478339qgs.106.1423313562859; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 04:52:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.96.158.137 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 04:52:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54D5D34C.20302@FreeBSD.org> References: <54D5D34C.20302@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 14:52:42 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is NO_PKG_REGISTER still supposed to work? From: Kimmo Paasiala To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 12:52:44 -0000 On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 2015/02/07 01:31, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: >> From bsd.port.mk: >> >> # NO_PKG_REGISTER >> # - Don't register a port installation as a package. >> >> However, testing this with a port results in the port installation >> performing the staging part only and the final installation from the >> stage directory on to the system being skipped when NO_PKG_REGISTER is >> set. Is this still supposed to work? > > I doubt it. pkg(8) doesn't have the capability to install a package > without updating the package database. Plus why would you even want to > do that nowadays? As I recall NO_PKG_REGISTER was a work-around for not > having staging or tools like poudriere where you can build a package > without scribbling on your live system. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > Would it be a good idea to remove it completely from bsd.port.mk for clarity and simplifying the code? I can see a few places in the file where it it's used in conditions and those look like no-ops now assuming NO_PKG_REGISTER is not used by anyone anymore. -Kimmo From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 13:00:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD5347DE; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 13:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.pingpong.net (mail2.pingpong.net [79.136.116.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D95262D; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 13:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.10] (h-85-24-195-48.na.cust.bahnhof.se [85.24.195.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6F042581A; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 14:00:10 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: postgresql93 port and libedit From: Palle Girgensohn X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12B466) In-Reply-To: <20150207112742.GA7344@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 14:00:10 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <224B8CCA-D2AE-4E3A-AD38-D7CF413F5610@pingpong.net> References: <20150115160113.GE98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150117004151.GO98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <171ED59D-E445-4605-B72C-E9ED8A74CA28@pingpong.net> <20150117140935.GQ98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150117145425.GR98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150207112742.GA7344@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: "pgsql@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , Waitman Gobble X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 13:00:14 -0000 > 7 feb 2015 kl. 12:27 skrev Baptiste Daroussin : >=20 >> On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 10:33:48AM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: >> Hello, >>=20 >> I switched to Libedit with the latest release, and it appears that some c= olour code support is missing from Libedit. Any of you know or have ideas ho= w to fix this? Is it just not implemented yet in Libedit? I cod of course ad= d an option to build with readline, but I am more inclined to just switch ba= ck rather than having one more option/complication in the port. So could you= please advice, is there a way to make this user happy using Libedit? >>=20 >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197362 >>=20 >> Palle > I'll have a look asap. >=20 > Best regards, > Bapt Also, history search, ctrl-R, seems to not have been implemented in libedit?= I'm leaning towards making libedit optional, at least for now. Opinions?= From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 14:07:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 816C54BE; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 14:07:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06D6BC28; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 14:07:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hi2so2859622wib.3; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 06:07:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=4270rkcDS5hd/seg/36XO4WjPTnWWtpqXR0s3SXvXOQ=; b=W3510chH80232hzkp5oqg8wMtXOLxBKo9Vf5uDc6Tv0HS/G/Z+uJZxOWBsG8OHLt+i 65ptJtRyF9r+YDoajMkYT3WSe//rpbL5VY9u0v3dB5UFi85UwNtb+CK+BklxhMmneOYJ GOu+Ulg0vAp36y/vQHj2gDAIfgNz7Gx9l9Jc9xkNFsuPju7A5Z/ksFkLsdDn9MRn13V4 ifmozeHpsOzTchFdPuRf77dJgV4+kNuPtPwDOH1NbKEUnHleViYC44RCVxoC5aPoI36m hDgx550MdsEW9nhBIn5B2cfpuc9KLuS5DAmKl7bOHJFq0mskV53RsHg4PhvthZezoD7E +oUw== X-Received: by 10.194.61.173 with SMTP id q13mr19612892wjr.137.1423318070497; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 06:07:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pr9sm7771126wjc.4.2015.02.07.06.07.48 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 07 Feb 2015 06:07:49 -0800 (PST) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 15:07:47 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Palle Girgensohn Subject: Re: postgresql93 port and libedit Message-ID: <20150207140747.GB7344@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150117004151.GO98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <171ED59D-E445-4605-B72C-E9ED8A74CA28@pingpong.net> <20150117140935.GQ98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150117145425.GR98528@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150207112742.GA7344@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <224B8CCA-D2AE-4E3A-AD38-D7CF413F5610@pingpong.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <224B8CCA-D2AE-4E3A-AD38-D7CF413F5610@pingpong.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "pgsql@FreeBSD.org" , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" , Waitman Gobble X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 14:07:52 -0000 --SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 02:00:10PM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: >=20 >=20 > > 7 feb 2015 kl. 12:27 skrev Baptiste Daroussin : > >=20 > >> On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 10:33:48AM +0100, Palle Girgensohn wrote: > >> Hello, > >>=20 > >> I switched to Libedit with the latest release, and it appears that som= e colour code support is missing from Libedit. Any of you know or have idea= s how to fix this? Is it just not implemented yet in Libedit? I cod of cour= se add an option to build with readline, but I am more inclined to just swi= tch back rather than having one more option/complication in the port. So co= uld you please advice, is there a way to make this user happy using Libedit? > >>=20 > >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197362 > >>=20 > >> Palle > > I'll have a look asap. > >=20 > > Best regards, > > Bapt >=20 > Also, history search, ctrl-R, seems to not have been implemented in libed= it? >=20 > I'm leaning towards making libedit optional, at least for now. Opinions? Sounds a good plan to move it back optional I'll dig for ctrl-R as well as it should work. Bapt --SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlTWHDMACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwNxwCfSSB8koGleqlTsKUSD3JoKKKg iTYAoIVcZwV+f4ghiha2spV5NnlcQV1B =2FE9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SkvwRMAIpAhPCcCJ-- From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 14:32:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 151EFB7F for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 14:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBB32E7B for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 14:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id k14so18570136wgh.10 for ; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 06:32:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hhOeL3qC/0tGpURDEvh9iOA5boNLetBGVdRV5ur9AO0=; b=iWN1cMoxMl9Cfuoy0H15cHjoK1KnCDp7drprqBd/hgQsRFvHlZjOOL2d4tq+8UR5gj idqJvbsqFpI0DWP1lkDO0XJVAoJykQpCQQ3Ro/NuzU6w699GY9iE96aYZXhR1kNP875G 1p5AHKwUoSFSTPIGP49cLDimceijjLY5ZcwsYZG3u2pPmdlx6taZXB5/wng+aGDY8aQZ 7pOCIBNMey35zU9V/r+wkX+C46Dy6kb7u9bCDVO8l9xC1yueC74l+rB4QNmyZhRGzw/E bKCH9cYYAAuBzrj5IuL7ootuyj3ITY3DCB8RQ8DXMWrj5KNuGDGYXgxe8D175DXN4YK0 +9OA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.81.98 with SMTP id z2mr14959117wix.40.1423319549990; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 06:32:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.81.1 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 06:32:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.81.1 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 06:32:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150207113830.GW44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150206203818.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150207113830.GW44537@home.opsec.eu> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 15:32:29 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hotfix and unbreak update that need to be commited From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= To: Kurt Jaeger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 14:32:32 -0000 El 07/02/2015 12:38, "Kurt Jaeger" escribi=C3=B3: > > Hi! > > > > Could any commiter take care of > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197378 > > > that updates devel/visualparadigm with a hotfix just released by the > > > upstream project? > > > > I'm testing it right now. > > It's committed. Thanks! > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 15:02:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD8966FE for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 15:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91DFB166 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 15:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.2]) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t17F2UBB006903 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 15:02:30 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t17F2UJS006902 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 15:02:30 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 15:02:30 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201502071502.t17F2UJS006902@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed for 8.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 15:02:30 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-8 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility --- --- describe.arabic --- --- describe.archivers --- --- describe.astro --- --- describe.audio --- --- describe.benchmarks --- --- describe.biology --- --- describe.cad --- --- describe.chinese --- --- describe.comms --- --- describe.converters --- --- describe.databases --- --- describe.deskutils --- --- describe.devel --- --- describe.dns --- --- describe.editors --- --- describe.emulators --- --- describe.finance --- --- describe.french --- --- describe.ftp --- [...] --- describe.misc --- --- describe.multimedia --- --- describe.net --- --- describe.net-im --- --- describe.devel --- make[5]: "/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/devel/py-stevedore/Makefile" line 19: Unassociated shell command "${PKGNAMEPREFIX}pbr>=0.10.0:${PORTSDIR}/devel/py-pbr ${PKGNAMEPREFIX}six>=1.7.0:${PORTSDIR}/devel/py-six" make[5]: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue===> devel/py-stevedore failed *** [describe.devel] Error code 1 make[2]: stopped in /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports make[2]: stopped in /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports 1 error Committers on the hook: antoine bofh gerald johans mandree nivit riggs Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': U lang/gcc49/Makefile U lang/gcc49/distinfo U print/ft2demos/Makefile U print/ft2demos/distinfo U archivers/lzo2/Makefile U archivers/lzo2/distinfo D archivers/lzo2/files/patch-util__check.sh U archivers/lzo2/files/patch-lzotest__lzotest.c U devel/patch/distinfo U devel/patch/Makefile U devel/py-stevedore/Makefile U audio/libsidplayfp/Makefile U audio/libsidplayfp/distinfo U audio/libsidplayfp/files/patch-Makefile.in U mail/dbmail/Makefile U mail/dbmail/distinfo U MOVED U sysutils/3dm/Makefile U sysutils/dar/pkg-plist U sysutils/dar/Makefile U sysutils/dar/distinfo U sysutils/Makefile U sysutils/parallel/Makefile U sysutils/parallel/distinfo A sysutils/avfs A sysutils/avfs/pkg-plist A sysutils/avfs/Makefile A sysutils/avfs/distinfo A sysutils/avfs/pkg-descr A sysutils/avfs/files A sysutils/avfs/files/patch-scripts_mountavs A sysutils/avfs/files/patch-scripts_umountavs A sysutils/avfs/files/patch-src_Makefile.in Updated to revision 378594. From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 15:52:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B251155 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 15:52:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE3507CB for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 15:52:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id em10so1230264wid.4 for ; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 07:52:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=H69QcKJ8+ht7xRrPA3Jc/QZjjhFauPEMuCn5tgLxnEg=; b=02ZdwNznHBoO8B13NouYeIT6mgV4hHBVXkZNsKYXLscufyjNHGMwpnmjNVpeAViBAk 7ranFFclBM/8IiAHCJL+ePoOL3Kk53H6yp3eLCGR9CGHUaGpkzsizFoWsfP5wENcJ+OH FcojHwpSLeAl+MhV/YTk3m65/6N9gZm+X+cEE4U4DbiRA/P3IHhOJHEwGSSmO4aH/vQF 8yyqztDGxntj9ovWE2QFyiR+kY/47axtYqrhOijP5yMwJGjsVtY3a30ybXnEaHwC5mO8 GnnCBtLt9w9BRZOgEosyOOk5RLOxGTI4E628WjaHjprPbb6DREnG384H46puptxVq61J l3ng== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.105.10 with SMTP id gi10mr15223587wib.24.1423324373265; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 07:52:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.81.1 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 07:52:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20150206203818.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150207071940.GV44537@home.opsec.eu> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 16:52:53 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hotfix and unbreak update that need to be commited From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= To: Kurt Jaeger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 15:52:55 -0000 On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa wrote: > > El 07/02/2015 08:19, "Kurt Jaeger" escribi=C3=B3: >> >> Hi! >> >> > > > And if the commiter is kind enough to take care of >> > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197135 that >> > > > updates >> > > >> > > Done. >> >> jbeich suggests in >> >> >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/2015-February/084775.h= tml >> >> that you improve the patch using SRC_BASE and test if SRC_BASE >> is available. Can you submit this and send me the PR ? I'll get it >> committed. Done: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D197394 >> > > I'm away from my computer for some time, but I'll do it and cone back to = you > soon. > > Cheers > >> -- >> pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years t= o >> go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 17:12:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2013766D for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 17:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C91B1EAB for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 17:12:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YK8vO-0007Qd-8e; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 18:12:06 +0100 Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 18:12:06 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Fernando =?iso-8859-1?Q?Apestegu=EDa?= Subject: Re: Hotfix and unbreak update that need to be commited Message-ID: <20150207171206.GX44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150206203818.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150207071940.GV44537@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:12:08 -0000 Hi! > >> jbeich suggests in > >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/2015-February/084775.html > >> that you improve the patch using SRC_BASE and test if SRC_BASE > >> is available. Can you submit this and send me the PR ? I'll get it > >> committed. > Done: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197394 Committed, thanks! -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 17:22:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82982D93 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 17:22:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from maul.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50C21FC6 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 17:22:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rancor.immure.com ([10.1.132.9]) by maul.immure.com with esmtp (Exim 4.85 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YK6oz-000AGT-Oi; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:57:22 -0600 Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t17EvLW5091350; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:57:21 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t17EvLHG091349; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:57:21 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 08:57:21 -0600 From: Bob Willcox To: Ben Woods Message-ID: <20150207145720.GE76302@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20150206205419.GD96060@rancor.immure.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 10.1.132.9 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bob@immure.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on maul.immure.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Re: multimedia/x264 build failure X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on maul.immure.com) Cc: ports list X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:22:37 -0000 On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 02:42:44PM +0800, Ben Woods wrote: > This issue was discussed in November here: > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2014-November/096717.html > > The result was an entry being added to UPDATING, which can be found here: > https://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=2729771+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2014/svn-ports-all/20141130.svn-ports-all > > "With the recent split of multimedia/x264 in library and binary and > library components, if an application that uses libx264 is updated > before x264 itself, multimedia/libx264 will conflict with the existing > x264 package. Delete > this package before continuing any update that depends on it: > > # pkg delete -f x264 > > Install the updated x264 and/or upgrade the other applications that > depend on libx264, such as ffmpeg." Thanks Ben for your response. So, I went ahead and deleted x264 and then ran 'portupgrade -a' to upgrade the dependent packages (ffmpeg & minidlna in my case, I believe). Is that all I need to do? Note that the x264 package did not reinstall. Is this because I no longer need it? Thanks, Bob -- Bob Willcox | You climb to reach the summit, but once bob@immure.com | there, discover that all roads lead down. Austin, TX | -- Stanislaw Lem, "The Cyberiad" From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 17:23:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B843DE1D for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 17:23:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x235.google.com (mail-yh0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F23FFCA for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 17:23:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f53.google.com with SMTP id v1so8762021yhn.12 for ; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 09:23:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=zz8J4SDPpAiHbYAFni7lTTPhbYHqV4ytOQX4EHAcSj0=; b=Pj3BjDcweIuMt/tRNVJ0Nv2/yIXGkI1vU2AEwAjax+RVzij/l/NXgyTAap1C9JIJ5l oFV6s7R45TOc995nElm5Xq4ztq/4mdKMf/IV9EvWWrZLMTCNwloFjg/SMdPYQR0qZkM+ vHhRKX1P5uv+gqUR/auY3fMnt4mRhvpmFFOib9+UgHdZsGpdnP9Q8ZYCHQIuE1ur2/lT DQT7w5bG3jZhiDPOZUoaVDB9089ThwUba5NG4xqejD/ObREGAIZCelSQ0FePG/RUdPtc 8rz9EbznqIL/cjAIT6jIFKPVQgT0a6s0RXdNNojPANI4AQPvU4PWMbHFULVMQKA3TwAm 3a6w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.30.98 with SMTP id j62mr3356466yha.105.1423329783494; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 09:23:03 -0800 (PST) Sender: antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com Received: by 10.170.142.198 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:23:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150207171206.GX44537@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150206203818.GU44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150207071940.GV44537@home.opsec.eu> <20150207171206.GX44537@home.opsec.eu> Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 17:23:03 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: QdnaYim96l5uW3a-TvP01IMgExc Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hotfix and unbreak update that need to be commited From: Antoine Brodin To: Kurt Jaeger Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:23:04 -0000 On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> >> jbeich suggests in > >> >> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-all/2015-February/084775.html > >> >> that you improve the patch using SRC_BASE and test if SRC_BASE >> >> is available. Can you submit this and send me the PR ? I'll get it >> >> committed. > >> Done: >> >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197394 > > Committed, thanks! I fixed the check but this still looks wrong, why doesn't the port link dynamically against zlib? If there is a vulnerability in zlib, the port won't be fixed by a zlib update. Cheers, Antoine From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 18:03:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 683AC8DC for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 18:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C23968D for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 18:03:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.2]) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t17I3xIr091363 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 18:03:59 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t17I3xuP091361 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 18:03:59 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 18:03:59 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201502071803.t17I3xuP091361@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX now builds successfully on 8.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 18:03:59 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 7 22:14:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F280EBF for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 22:14:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22b.google.com (mail-we0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4B48E89 for ; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 22:14:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id k11so20055063wes.2 for ; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 14:14:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=OPEteZBB5qwTy5ddOyPJLXMj6U33ns7ahzkb+Rtw55c=; b=Xm902A1mSubp4x+X1Dhymf+HPfm07HlHNrZe3ZtYUVaxFGOWi2gboPsSf8vUfbKic/ UkkiDKWRtiy67EvRNhNs6fGhfRqvek93ny3FlGfiMkJcrRaqW2Lq9yYUqiRC+wS8I6aq 0r2ZUZH9DXCVLUZ2pmEdMNumCWVU1N9rNdzGpBM8jMFrP/M5m+J5hu2GK/0x5zgbc+gj QvwJ94SDzM/0+P3q8/hCsRNATIwvY1FWZHyFP8zG1k92n0gktAU+jhNYSqesh1G5LJ5A iYrUVSUOfiLBjggZ/YCK1OiPSvGCvH8VwyUV4i3VfBUj47Z4hQX8E3mAIjLiwOHu2h9+ hGLQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.7.199 with SMTP id l7mr18865270wia.66.1423347272313; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 14:14:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.241.132 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 14:14:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150207145720.GE76302@rancor.immure.com> References: <20150206205419.GD96060@rancor.immure.com> <20150207145720.GE76302@rancor.immure.com> Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 06:14:32 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: multimedia/x264 build failure From: Ben Woods To: Bob Willcox Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: ports list X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 22:14:34 -0000 Correct. x264 port is no longer needed. Instead, the libx264 port is used (and should be installed automatically). On Saturday, February 7, 2015, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Sat, Feb 07, 2015 at 02:42:44PM +0800, Ben Woods wrote: > > This issue was discussed in November here: > > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2014-November/096717.html > > > > The result was an entry being added to UPDATING, which can be found here: > > > https://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=2729771+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2014/svn-ports-all/20141130.svn-ports-all > > > > "With the recent split of multimedia/x264 in library and binary and > > library components, if an application that uses libx264 is updated > > before x264 itself, multimedia/libx264 will conflict with the existing > > x264 package. Delete > > this package before continuing any update that depends on it: > > > > # pkg delete -f x264 > > > > Install the updated x264 and/or upgrade the other applications that > > depend on libx264, such as ffmpeg." > > Thanks Ben for your response. > > So, I went ahead and deleted x264 and then ran 'portupgrade -a' to upgrade > the > dependent packages (ffmpeg & minidlna in my case, I believe). Is that all > I need to do? Note that the x264 package did not reinstall. Is this because > I no longer need it? > > Thanks, > Bob > > -- > Bob Willcox | You climb to reach the summit, but once > bob@immure.com | there, discover that all roads lead down. > Austin, TX | -- Stanislaw Lem, "The Cyberiad" > -- -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com