From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 25 01:12:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00018F17 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 01:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4CC9BD1 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 01:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-61-84.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.61.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E148E2474E; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 02:11:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t0P1Bwk2002000; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 02:11:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 02:11:58 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Alex Maleev Subject: Re: FreeBSD Message-Id: <20150125021158.791364b0.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 01:12:09 -0000 On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 23:04:37 +0300, Alex Maleev wrote: > What do you recommend for the release of the computer: Nvidia GeForse GTH > 550 Ti, Intel Core i3-2100 3.10GHz Current FreeBSD 10.1 amd64 is probably the right choice. Consult the X drivers (probably nvidia-driver) for GPU support. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 25 04:24:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A704B51 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 04:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DECF5E73 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 04:24:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id t0P4OZKx006436 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 20:24:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.14.2/Submit) with UUCP id t0P4OZT6006435 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 24 Jan 2015 20:24:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from fbsd81 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA22296; Sat, 24 Jan 15 20:15:05 PST Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 20:15:05 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com (Perry Hutchison) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit logs Message-Id: <54c46dc9.g8hlWlQMinVEej1f%perryh@pluto.rain.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 04:24:42 -0000 How would I go about either viewing online, or downloading to view offline, the svn commit logs for base for the last month -- without needing to "svn co" all of base/head? (I don't run current.) Poudriere is complaining that one of my ports no longer builds on HEAD, and I'm wondering if there may have been an incompatible change in a .h file. I haven't found anything obviously related in base/head/UPDATING, nor in the archives of current@. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 25 09:16:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77BACFB5 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 09:16:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay106.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay106.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12EB0B36 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 09:16:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=Xz9Uco7AEzg9ElRFdtKQLJViOsXK4SGQVO9ewqrYxis= c=1 sm=2 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=GKysJfYJAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=jdHI3jPs8rvgWcybOPEA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmkJANGzxFRbsIcT/2dsb2JhbABagwZSWcYwCoVrBAICgQ5EAQEBAQF9hA0BAQQBAjccGAsQCxgJJQ8ZER4ZiDABCNFCAQEBAQEBAQMBAQEBAQEYBI94B4QpBZI5gziCHZI9IoNvPTGCQgEBAQ Received: from 19.135-176-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.176.135.19]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2015 10:16:18 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0P9GHSD001021; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:16:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:16:17 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: perryh@pluto.rain.com (Perry Hutchison) Subject: Re: svn commit logs Message-ID: <20150125101617.1977d2c5@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <54c46dc9.g8hlWlQMinVEej1f%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <54c46dc9.g8hlWlQMinVEej1f%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 09:16:21 -0000 On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 20:15:05 -0800 perryh@pluto.rain.com (Perry Hutchison) wrote: > How would I go about either viewing online, or downloading to view > offline, the svn commit logs for base for the last month -- without > needing to "svn co" all of base/head? (I don't run current.) > > Poudriere is complaining that one of my ports no longer builds on > HEAD, and I'm wondering if there may have been an incompatible > change in a .h file. I haven't found anything obviously related > in base/head/UPDATING, nor in the archives of current@. The mailing list archives maybe: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 25 09:37:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C180C7DC for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 09:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com (mail-wg0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53EB0DB1 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 09:37:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id y19so4368729wgg.11 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 01:37:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=a6Mf4ikFY7M1OXee5pnD3o9AZJwSa90k7RbSZfOOEtA=; b=dnNGojMq/LMyuLAfSdrmCWH8oIry7J6O9R/6GINmKvBlLNIe1TuJ+sHuX/qqF//D6F M0jejJ+lm4LYYnuXPWMeb/Livsf1+t8RSgCTO7yVanmcUoQC5UQhzoW2oh6lhyfTUEq5 o5zrxwmdeM1SX72yw9YNWGx79X050sE1+bc7L8lUzlbykoYRb5uqPrn++rmOLWDjoIT0 jGNjLn7arSgIgDH9SmF3/U1KOHFUFSHvaCzMjvfYswX+3MktvzbD5aD2t1Cg4/dCTiv1 2jW5wr36/SUh3r19kBT1iZAYNytq1BlEA0G3CzpMSiOOgq9xdsd1wTi1JH/wAiexPjtP k/oQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.87.42 with SMTP id u10mr15008550wiz.51.1422178644667; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 01:37:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.14.170 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 01:37:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54c46dc9.g8hlWlQMinVEej1f%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <54c46dc9.g8hlWlQMinVEej1f%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:37:24 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit logs From: Johan Hendriks To: Perry Hutchison Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 09:37:26 -0000 Op zondag 25 januari 2015 heeft Perry Hutchison het volgende geschreven: > How would I go about either viewing online, or downloading to view > offline, the svn commit logs for base for the last month -- without > needing to "svn co" all of base/head? (I don't run current.) > > Poudriere is complaining that one of my ports no longer builds on > HEAD, and I'm wondering if there may have been an incompatible > change in a .h file. I haven't found anything obviously related > in base/head/UPDATING, nor in the archives of current@. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org " > You could try freshbsd.org It logs commits from all major bsd projecs. Regards Johan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 25 14:50:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB03D838 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:50:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from potato.growveg.org (potato.growveg.org [62.49.247.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43E36CED for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:50:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from john by potato.growveg.org with local (Exim 4.85 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YFNyA-000A1A-EA for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:15:18 +0000 Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:15:18 +0000 From: John To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: real IP and rfc1918 IP on the same machine - how? Message-ID: <20150125141518.GA23664@potato.growveg.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: John X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john@potato.growveg.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on potato.growveg.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 14:50:23 -0000 hello freebsd-questions, I have a workstation with two NICs - one wired (real IP address on a /28) and one wireless, which I want to configure to use the protected wireless LAN on 192.168.100.0/24. I want the internet to route through real IP address, and I want access to the wireless LAN. I don't want to route out to the internet through the wireless LAN, I just need to be able to contact the machines within it. The wireless LAN itself has its own gateway, which is not this machine but a wifi access point. How can I configure the ath0 interface so it sees the wireless LAN but doesn't break routing to the outside world on this machine? Both interfaces will have static IPs. I have tried statically assigning ath0 (wireless interface) to 192.168.100.100 255.255.255.0 , em0 interface to [real IP] and default gateway to the real IP of the gateway, but once I bring the interfaces up I cannot access the real IP of the default gateway. can anyone help? thanks, -- John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 25 15:16:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C9D4FAB for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:16:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a26.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E155CF3C for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:16:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a26.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a26.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F70B8058; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 07:16:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=doomgeek.com; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s= doomgeek.com; bh=MqiusSQXJXYUH84JusWDDsj5pmY=; b=ED2sDODoemscUHx V/Acaqq5p8OAH7B6/FuGvX5I/uXRbjG7WQsYUwgH8F7TPu8XDPFBLOU/G/zNj560 xUbITy4OaXfQFypYOLGsOVsRR4ink3DMKZ1VksiGJlc5pgiWVJNbKv/0fiZ/SZ2O tr8NeJ5FnCPx/X7MfP6FrjGJ1ej8= Received: from [10.0.66.52] (c-73-20-92-222.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [73.20.92.222]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: geek@doomgeek.com) by homiemail-a26.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D24DB8057; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 07:16:12 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: real IP and rfc1918 IP on the same machine - how? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: Matthew Hardcastle In-Reply-To: <20150125141518.GA23664@potato.growveg.org> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 08:16:11 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20150125141518.GA23664@potato.growveg.org> To: John X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 15:16:19 -0000 > On Jan 25, 2015, at 7:15 AM, John = wrote: >=20 > hello freebsd-questions, >=20 > I have a workstation with two NICs - one wired (real IP address on a=20= > /28) and one wireless, which I want to configure to use the protected=20= > wireless LAN on 192.168.100.0/24. I want the internet to route through=20= > real IP address, and I want access to the wireless LAN. I don't want = to=20 > route out to the internet through the wireless LAN, I just need to be=20= > able to contact the machines within it. The wireless LAN itself has = its=20 > own gateway, which is not this machine but a wifi access point. >=20 > How can I configure the ath0 interface so it sees the wireless LAN but=20= > doesn't break routing to the outside world on this machine? Both=20 > interfaces will have static IPs. I have tried statically assigning = ath0=20 > (wireless interface) to 192.168.100.100 255.255.255.0 , em0 interface = to=20 > [real IP] and default gateway to the real IP of the gateway, but once = I=20 > bring the interfaces up I cannot access the real IP of the default=20 > gateway. >=20 > can anyone help? >=20 > thanks, >=20 > --=20 > John=20 Hi John, The setup you=E2=80=99re describing is pretty standard and should = =E2=80=9Cjust work=E2=80=9D when configured correctly. It sounds like = you may have misconfigured one of your interfaces. The output of = `ifconfig`, `netstat -rn`, and `grep ^ifconfig /etc/rc.conf` would be = helpful in diagnosing your issue. Also, I noticed you say your wired interface is a /28 but then state = it=E2=80=99s configured as a /24. Perhaps this is your issue? Matt= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 25 16:50:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C57622FE for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 16:50:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from potato.growveg.org (potato.growveg.org [62.49.247.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 824E2A3E for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 16:50:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from john by potato.growveg.org with local (Exim 4.85 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YFQOB-000A9c-8X for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 16:50:19 +0000 Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 16:50:19 +0000 From: freebsd-lists@potato.growveg.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: real IP and rfc1918 IP on the same machine - how? Message-ID: <20150125165019.GA38580@potato.growveg.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20150125141518.GA23664@potato.growveg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: John X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john@potato.growveg.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on potato.growveg.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 16:50:28 -0000 On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 08:16:11AM -0700, Matthew Hardcastle wrote: > > Hi John, > > The setup you’re describing is pretty standard and should “just work” > when configured correctly. It sounds like you may have misconfigured > one of your interfaces. The output of `ifconfig`, `netstat -rn`, and > `grep ^ifconfig /etc/rc.conf` would be helpful in diagnosing your > issue. > > Also, I noticed you say your wired interface is a /28 but then state > it’s configured as a /24. Perhaps this is your issue? Ah sorry I've probably worded it wrongly. em0 = wired interface = real ip on a /28 = 255.255.255.240 netmask ath0 = wireless interface = 192.168.100.100 netmask 255.255.255.0 Something just occurred to me. If the default route i.e. 0.0.0.0/0 -> my real router ip then how am I going to exclude 192.168.100.0/24 ? -- John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 25 16:56:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6F093F4 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 16:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from l2mail1.panix.com (l2mail1.panix.com [166.84.1.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23B9A6E for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 16:56:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailbackend.panix.com (mailbackend.panix.com [166.84.1.89]) by l2mail1.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1B0CB20 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:39:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from gopherwood-6.local (nat-130-132-173-128.central.yale.edu [130.132.173.128]) by mailbackend.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE71013C0A for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:38:57 -0500 (EST) Received: by gopherwood-6.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2F3D91613FD0; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:38:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 11:38:50 -0500 From: Cory Francis Myers To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: login_tty /dev/console: Inappropriate ioctl for device Message-ID: <20150125163850.GD5396@gopherwood-6.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 16:56:30 -0000 Since upgrading to 10.1-RELEASE-p3, a Xen DomU running an HVM kernel complains of the following--- > Jan 24 22:06:06 knossos getty[3883]: login_tty /dev/console: Inappropriate ioctl for device > Jan 24 22:06:06 knossos getty[3885]: login_tty /dev/console: Inappropriate ioctl for device > Jan 24 22:06:06 knossos getty[3887]: login_tty /dev/console: Inappropriate ioctl for device > Jan 24 22:06:07 knossos getty[3889]: login_tty /dev/console: Inappropriate ioctl for device > Jan 24 22:06:07 knossos init: getty repeating too quickly on port /dev/console, sleeping 30 secs ---although via Xen I can connect to its ttyu0 just fine. The relevant lines in "/etc/ttys": > console "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt100 on secure > > [...] > > ttyu0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" vt100 onifconsole secure I'd be grateful for any advice. --- cfm. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 25 17:51:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1124FE0 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 17:51:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a104.g.dreamhost.com (sub4.mail.dreamhost.com [69.163.253.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D241AF86 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 17:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from homiemail-a104.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a104.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F512004692F; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 09:51:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=doomgeek.com; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s= doomgeek.com; bh=OGtq5aD5l1+lGAuAf+i83K7hLcU=; b=bu1TjF+6Z1+ZCAM CUK2AQTgwOk0y3lxDTvNKSDsw3AWyJhJEKIY57GWLhXO+ZrlokIj+vCHL9MF4IWs QWcNbU+kkFg7bT+ZXTxJ2sfM2YGYE1P+onIvhO7vcv7mc6nkjYXDUCpwOwWzPA0B B105mRakW4WPLNLipsAVTi6/OoFY= Received: from [10.0.66.52] (c-73-20-92-222.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [73.20.92.222]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: geek@doomgeek.com) by homiemail-a104.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E7CD20046912; Sun, 25 Jan 2015 09:51:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: real IP and rfc1918 IP on the same machine - how? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: Matthew Hardcastle In-Reply-To: <20150125165019.GA38580@potato.growveg.org> Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:51:51 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <44F0B11B-918A-4A44-8F90-99778991ED14@doomgeek.com> References: <20150125141518.GA23664@potato.growveg.org> <20150125165019.GA38580@potato.growveg.org> To: freebsd-lists@potato.growveg.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 17:51:53 -0000 > On Jan 25, 2015, at 9:50 AM, freebsd-lists@potato.growveg.org wrote: >=20 > Ah sorry I've probably worded it wrongly.=20 >=20 > em0 =3D wired interface =3D real ip on a /28 =3D 255.255.255.240 = netmask > ath0 =3D wireless interface =3D 192.168.100.100 netmask 255.255.255.0 >=20 > Something just occurred to me. If the default route i.e. 0.0.0.0/0 -> = my=20 > real router ip then how am I going to exclude 192.168.100.0/24 ? > --=20 > John=20 You don=E2=80=99t need to do anything other than assign the IP and = subnet to your wireless interface to exclude it from the default route. = Your computer decides which interface it will send a packet out of based = on the most specific route for that packet it can find in the routing = table. For example, If you have a packet destined for 192.168.100.1 your = computer will choose your wireless interface because the packet matches = 192.168.100.0/24 more specifically that it matches 0.0.0.0/0. Double checking your routing table (by running `netstat -rn`) and your = interface configuration (by running `ifconfig` and `grep ^ifconfig = /etc/rc.conf`) will allow us to make sure you=E2=80=99re interfaces are = actually configured as your expect they are. Matt= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 05:14:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3CB9105 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 05:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail190.atl81.rsgsv.net (mail190.atl81.rsgsv.net [198.2.129.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAB20AB1 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 05:14:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=mail190.atl81.rsgsv.net; h=Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Date:Message-ID:List-ID:List-Unsubscribe:Sender:Content-Type:MIME-Version; i=team=3Dpivotpointresearch.com@mail190.atl81.rsgsv.net; bh=0y6CibaXYPnJlDdPoBM9+hhAHT4=; b=ZGw9o2wpnRJGc7cuscKQZtn8zAnDORXgs+xHXjk1vY+LnW1eLUiR8KpWpZTrMu1MiIkJ+jWEwXhI QmQ6hz69Ci3daNNn5H1qxhoRRlYWpbMbOqpriAqPLJuXX6berIY6JgcdQZQR29O2eyMTkjOmKBrd a4rksIesN4ij8Jg1UpM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=mail190.atl81.rsgsv.net; b=NT/7a3I+EuJX35HffMvksmIY9+PEvaiufqxHSzPZk0CtcS2kSsqdpF9rKvq/oTZ/AnZUe3F1ub/p 7+yXgfigQMOxs39l5LRsw5CCKNv67bvMaOFGlXb9GFZZbLPvE390x+RBPMptbR/att8iF2QtflM8 LyZzPndJ3rYITsZ9dSQ=; Received: from (127.0.0.1) by mail190.atl81.rsgsv.net id hon6l61ohk0n for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 04:59:50 +0000 (envelope-from ) Subject: =?utf-8?Q?Coder=20perspectives=20matter=21?= From: =?utf-8?Q?Pivot=20Point=20and=20Coderdojo=20Foundation?= Reply-To: =?utf-8?Q?Pivot=20Point=20and=20Coderdojo=20Foundation?= To: Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 04:59:50 +0000 Message-ID: X-Mailer: MailChimp Mailer - **CID01843467da0ea92e0e57** X-Campaign: mailchimpc882bfb77c5d4e9b978afdb17.01843467da X-campaignid: mailchimpc882bfb77c5d4e9b978afdb17.01843467da X-Report-Abuse: Please report abuse for this campaign here: http://www.mailchimp.com/abuse/abuse.phtml?u=c882bfb77c5d4e9b978afdb17&id=01843467da&e=0ea92e0e57 X-MC-User: c882bfb77c5d4e9b978afdb17 X-Feedback-ID: 34127189:34127189.802857:us9:mc X-Accounttype: pd Sender: "Pivot Point and Coderdojo Foundation" x-mcda: FALSE MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="fixed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 05:15:00 -0000 Please watch for Pivotal Perspectives invitations View this email in your browser (http://us9.campaign-archive2.com/?u=3Dc88= 2bfb77c5d4e9b978afdb17&id=3D01843467da&e=3D0ea92e0e57) ** Coder perspectives matter! ------------------------------------------------------------ In the next few weeks you will be receiving a few invitations from us to s= hare your software developer perspectives with some of the world's largest= tech companies who are actively making plans to launch new and improved p= rograms and products that developers around the world will be using. This will be a great opportunity for you to influence the direction of tho= se developer platforms=2C programs and tools and at the same time support= the good work that CoderDojo (http://www.coderdojo.com?mc_cid=3D01843467d= a&mc_eid=3D[UNIQID]) is doing to connect developers with kids who want to= learn software programming languages. Thanks in advance for your participation and please forward this email to= any coder colleagues who might be interested in participating in this pro= gram or have them visit www.pivotpointresearch.com/jointhepanel http://www.pivotpointresearch.com/jointhepanel?mc_cid=3D01843467da&mc_eid= =3D[UNIQID] =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Copyright =C2=A9 2015 Pivot Point Research Group and CoderDojo Foundation= =2C All rights reserved. You are registered as a member of the Pivotal Perspectives Advisory Panel Our mailing address is: Pivot Point Research Group and CoderDojo Foundation 40 Lake Bellevue Drive Suite 100 Bellevue=2C WA 98005 USA ** unsubscribe from this list (http://pivotpointresearch.us9.list-manage.c= om/unsubscribe?u=3Dc882bfb77c5d4e9b978afdb17&id=3Ddac6d932e6&e=3D0ea92e0e57&= c=3D01843467da) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 06:21:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 103B7E4F for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "SDF.ORG" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA2AAFE4 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:bennett@otaku.freeshell.org [192.94.73.9]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0Q624jg018844 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO) for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:02:05 GMT Received: (from bennett@localhost) by sdf.org (8.14.8/8.12.8/Submit) id t0Q6247U019973 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 00:02:04 -0600 (CST) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <201501260602.t0Q6247U019973@sdf.org> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 00:02:04 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: buildworld, buildkernel, and devel/cache User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 6/20/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:21:22 -0000 I am now running FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE (amd64) r277396 and have installed devel/ccache. In /etc/make.conf I have WITH_CCACHE_BUILD=yes CCACHE_CPP2=1 In /etc/src.conf I have WITH_LLDB= In /root/.profile I have CCACHE_DIR=/buildwork/ccache export PATH=/usr/local/libexec/ccache:$PATH export CCACHE_PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin In /root/.cshrc.extensions, a file I source from /root/.cshrc, I have setenv CCACHE_DIR /buildwork/ccache setenv PATH /usr/local/libexec/ccache:$PATH setenv CCACHE_PATH /usr/bin:/usr/local/bin ccache seems to be working just fine for building ports with portmaster, but I don't see any evidence that either "make buildworld" or "make buildkernel" make any use of ccache at all. I've searched the archives for several FreeBSD lists, but haven't turned up anything helpful. If someone knows what I need to do to get ccache involved in buildworld and buildkernel, would you share it here please? I would very much like to reduce the times for those builds. Also, if so, please Cc me directly because I'm currently subscribed only to the digest form of these lists, which means I may not see responses until the digest arrives, which is often a day or more after a followup is posted. Thanks greatly for any help on this! Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at sdf.org *xor* bennett at freeshell.org * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 06:49:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A83BC60A for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:49:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bucksport.safeport.com (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D42A30D for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:49:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bucksport.safeport.com (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]) by bucksport.safeport.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0Q6QcKX067846 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 01:26:38 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 01:26:37 -0500 (EST) From: doug@safeport.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: libpng16.so.16 not found Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 01:26:38 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:49:18 -0000 My FreeBSD muse suggested I might be a better result from a site I was testing by using Chrome. Installing the chromium package begot the not found in the subject running firefox. There was a similar problem with chrome itself. As I run xfce on a 10.0 system, my first attempt was to see if I could fix the issue. The following set of pkg commands posed on FreeBSD forum by Anil-G: pkg check --shlibs -nva | grep -v done pkg version -vRL=|less pkg upgrade -n seemed promising. The first command yields the shared libs that need to be upgraded. The version command lists packages that need updated and the upgrade command tell you what will be upgraded. Check showed only one library for firefox but the upgrade command indicated 100s of thing to be replaced and/or updated included Xorg and Xfce. So I tried replacing the one lib. This lead to a series of changes eventually breaking midori. At this point I "gave up and ran the whole process in single user mode. This took less that 15-20 minutes and worked perfectly. 'pkg autoremove' then removed the orphaned packages. To me this is the 'holy grail' of X-windows on FreeBSD. Would portupgrade or postmaster have allowed me to skip updating Xfce and Xorg? If not what advantages do they offer at this point? _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-217-9220 Fax: 301-217-9277 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 08:24:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4B0F815 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:24:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frv27.fwdcdn.com (frv158.fwdcdn.com [212.42.77.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74129D6A for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:24:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=fsm; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=bMyM/KRmst0HGZBC5KaChkLdWEBc103WrnDMyGvWkxc=; b=mTCqYKeVuzOnLfw2YU04alINoLWL91JgelcMBPELP4iFZ/xVDz1dELlAgN45USGgdtuwmUEniMnM77Mw4CgGNb4ywMAHKfgoqkIvCddi5ogudrAn06Azcx+5cf4xWHX9LUZ8y86SWV4G01a01us5Pg3L6wPwfFd31PeQa2Liy9Q=; Received: from [5.248.240.69] (helo=nonamehost.local) by frv27.fwdcdn.com with esmtpsa ID 1YFey7-000HW4-8c ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:24:23 +0200 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:24:22 +0200 From: Ivan Klymenko To: Scott Bennett Subject: Re: buildworld, buildkernel, and devel/cache Message-ID: <20150126102422.518a48db@nonamehost.local> In-Reply-To: <201501260602.t0Q6247U019973@sdf.org> References: <201501260602.t0Q6247U019973@sdf.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Authentication-Result: IP=5.248.240.69; mail.from=fidaj@ukr.net; dkim=pass; header.d=ukr.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 08:24:38 -0000 =D0=92 Mon, 26 Jan 2015 00:02:04 -0600 Scott Bennett =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: > I am now running FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE (amd64) r277396 and have > installed devel/ccache. In /etc/make.conf I have >=20 > WITH_CCACHE_BUILD=3Dyes > CCACHE_CPP2=3D1 >=20 > In /etc/src.conf I have >=20 > WITH_LLDB=3D >=20 > In /root/.profile I have >=20 > CCACHE_DIR=3D/buildwork/ccache > export PATH=3D/usr/local/libexec/ccache:$PATH > export CCACHE_PATH=3D/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin >=20 > In /root/.cshrc.extensions, a file I source from /root/.cshrc, I have >=20 > setenv CCACHE_DIR /buildwork/ccache > setenv PATH /usr/local/libexec/ccache:$PATH > setenv CCACHE_PATH /usr/bin:/usr/local/bin >=20 > ccache seems to be working just fine for building ports with > portmaster, but I don't see any evidence that either "make > buildworld" or "make buildkernel" make any use of ccache at all. > I've searched the archives for several FreeBSD lists, but haven't > turned up anything helpful. If someone knows what I need to do to > get ccache involved in buildworld and buildkernel, would you share it > here please? I would very much like to reduce the times for those > builds. Also, if so, please Cc me directly because I'm currently > subscribed only to the digest form of these lists, which means I may > not see responses until the digest arrives, which is often a day or > more after a followup is posted. Thanks greatly for any help on this! >=20 This file is in some ways you can help /usr/local/share/doc/ccache/ccache-howto-freebsd.txt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 09:39:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D3E4ECC for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:39:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DUB004-OMC4S14.hotmail.com (dub004-omc4s14.hotmail.com [157.55.2.89]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FF06798 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:39:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from DUB123-W34 ([157.55.2.72]) by DUB004-OMC4S14.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 01:38:37 -0800 X-TMN: [ExOTP94hUx4pwPX7GfkDeaWUQ/tmo06B] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: Manish Jain To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Still more USB woes on freebsd-10.1-i386 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:38:37 +0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: , MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jan 2015 09:38:37.0622 (UTC) FILETIME=[DC5DF560:01D0394B] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:39:48 -0000 > Date: Fri=2C 2 Jan 2015 21:14:08 +0530 > From: bourne.identity@hotmail.com > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: USB woes on freebsd-10.1-i386 >=20 >=20 > Hi=2C >=20 > I installed FreeBSD-10.1-i386 with GNOME on my AMD Athlon computer (3.4=20 > GHz=2C 1.75 GB RAM) a couple of months ago. While I am generally happy=20 > with my OS (to the extent that I hardly ever need to boot into Windows=20 > XP SP3)=2C there are a couple of USB-related problems that won't go away= =20 > on my system and that I can't fix by myself. >=20 > 1) My Canon PIXMA MG2470 printer does not print. Although a) all=20 > necessary ports are installed=2C b) print/cups-base has been built with= =20 > libusb=2C and c) the printer is recognized immediately by the system the= =20 > moment it is switched on=2C the list of local printers in CUPS=20 > browser-based configuration is empty. Further=2C the printer - when=20 > switched on - shows up at an indeterminate location /dev/usb/2.X.0 (X=20 > could be 3 or 5 or 6)=2C despite explicitly being hooked to /dev/usb/2.6.= 0=20 > in /etc/devfs.rules >=20 > 2) The APC UPS attached to my system is not able to shut down my system=20 > in case of a power failure=2C although apcupsd.conf is configured to=20 > initiate a system shutdown when battery level falls below 5 minutes=20 > remaining. Running self-test with acptest succeeds with result PASSED=2C= =20 > but battery calibration with apctest fails with the message "Failed to=20 > read current battery level" despite battery level being 100% and load=20 > being in the region of 20% (percentage figures as reported by APC=20 > Powerchute v3.0.2 on Windows XP SP3). >=20 > Both printer and UPS work seamlessly under Windows XP SP3. >=20 > I am attaching to this message a zip archive containing : >=20 > output of 'uname -a' > list of ports installed > latest log of dmesg > copy of /etc/rc.conf >=20 >=20 > Thanks for any help. >=20 >=20 > Regards=2C >=20 > Manish Jain > +91-98995-82709 It gets worse. Now my standard 101-key Logitech keyboard freezes (without r= ecovering) while using GNOME. So now I have 3 devices which don't work : 1) UPS which can run a self-test but is unable to shut down the computer up= on power failure 2) printer which does not get detected 3) keyboard which freezes after a while Although each problem can be attributed to a separate port=2C the common th= read is USB. All 3 devices work perfectly under Windows XP SP3. The externa= l USB hub I use can be ruled out because the printer and keyboard are conne= cted directly to motherboard ports. Unless there is a trouble-shooting manual=2C all I can do is wait for the n= ext FreeBSD release - and let Microsoft win the argument for the meanwhile. Regards=2C Manish Jain = From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 12:45:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37D0B5C9 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:45:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "SDF.ORG" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1899BCCA for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:45:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:bennett@otaku.freeshell.org [192.94.73.9]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0QCjU96016958 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO) for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:45:30 GMT Received: (from bennett@localhost) by sdf.org (8.14.8/8.12.8/Submit) id t0QCjUMD009768 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:45:30 -0600 (CST) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <201501261245.t0QCjUMD009768@sdf.org> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:45:30 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildworld, buildkernel, and devel/cache User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 6/20/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:45:36 -0000 On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:24:22 +0200 Ivan Klymenko wrote: >? Mon, 26 Jan 2015 00:02:04 -0600 >Scott Bennett ?????: > >> I am now running FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE (amd64) r277396 and have >> installed devel/ccache. In /etc/make.conf I have >> >> WITH_CCACHE_BUILD=yes >> CCACHE_CPP2=1 >> >> In /etc/src.conf I have >> >> WITH_LLDB= >> >> In /root/.profile I have >> >> CCACHE_DIR=/buildwork/ccache >> export PATH=/usr/local/libexec/ccache:$PATH >> export CCACHE_PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin >> >> In /root/.cshrc.extensions, a file I source from /root/.cshrc, I have >> >> setenv CCACHE_DIR /buildwork/ccache >> setenv PATH /usr/local/libexec/ccache:$PATH >> setenv CCACHE_PATH /usr/bin:/usr/local/bin >> >> ccache seems to be working just fine for building ports with >> portmaster, but I don't see any evidence that either "make >> buildworld" or "make buildkernel" make any use of ccache at all. >> I've searched the archives for several FreeBSD lists, but haven't >> turned up anything helpful. If someone knows what I need to do to >> get ccache involved in buildworld and buildkernel, would you share it >> here please? I would very much like to reduce the times for those >> builds. Also, if so, please Cc me directly because I'm currently >> subscribed only to the digest form of these lists, which means I may >> not see responses until the digest arrives, which is often a day or >> more after a followup is posted. Thanks greatly for any help on this! >> > >This file is in some ways you can >help /usr/local/share/doc/ccache/ccache-howto-freebsd.txt I had read that and hadn't seen how that would work, but after seeing your reply, I tried adding the three lines to /etc/make.conf and got errors, like I had expected: make: "/etc/make.conf" line 18: Missing dependency operator make: RE substitution error: repetition-operator operand invalid make: Unclosed substitution for CXX (, missing) make: "/etc/make.conf" line 20: Undefined variable "${CXX:C,^c++,/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/c++,1}" make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue make: stopped in /usr/src So my question remains. Please respond if you have something that you have tried and know works. Thanks in advance. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at sdf.org *xor* bennett at freeshell.org * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 13:34:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BA131E0 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:34:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kirk-ext.obspm.fr (kirk-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.193.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.obspm.fr", Issuer "TERENA SSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AACCC1F1 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:34:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pcjas.obspm.fr (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by kirk-ext.obspm.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/DIO Observatoire de Paris - 15/04/10) with ESMTP id t0QDXnO2018833 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:33:50 +0100 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:34:06 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: mrsas on Dell R730 Message-ID: <20150126133406.GA25856@pcjas.obspm.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (kirk-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.193.20]); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:33:50 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at kirk-ext.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:34:08 -0000 Hi everyone. I've a new R730, and I just install FreeBSD 10.1 with mrsas driver for the raid card (the mfi don't works). Now the server is up and running I would like to known if they are any method to get the status of the raid card ? I just pull out one disk from the raid luns so the volume should be on degraded mode, but I don't see anywhere. No message on the dmesg. And through camcontrol I don't see how I can get the status. Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO btiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex France Tlphone : +33 1 45 07 76 26/+33 6 86 69 95 71 xmpp: jas@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: lun 26 jan 2015 14:31:37 CET From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 13:48:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 345BFA0F for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from raven.philkeogh.com (unknown [IPv6:2600:3c01::f03c:91ff:fe96:d731]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F855382 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by raven.philkeogh.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id t0QDm5g3023139; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 05:48:06 -0800 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 05:48:05 -0800 (PST) From: Philip Keogh X-X-Sender: pkeogh@raven.philkeogh.com To: Albert Shih Subject: Re: mrsas on Dell R730 In-Reply-To: <20150126133406.GA25856@pcjas.obspm.fr> Message-ID: References: <20150126133406.GA25856@pcjas.obspm.fr> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:48:07 -0000 On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Albert Shih wrote: > Hi everyone. > > I've a new R730, and I just install FreeBSD 10.1 with mrsas driver for > the raid card (the mfi don't works). > > Now the server is up and running I would like to known if they are any > method to get the status of the raid card ? > > I just pull out one disk from the raid luns so the volume should be on > degraded mode, but I don't see anywhere. No message on the dmesg. > And through camcontrol I don't see how I can get the status. > > Regards. > > JAS > Have you tried the MegaCli or MegaCli6? It works on PERC controllers. The commands and syntax take a while to get used to, and comprehensive documentation is sparse - http://tools.rapidsoft.de/perc/ is a good resource as well as IBM's manual for their implementation at http://goo.gl/0mLjEl to learn more. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 13:55:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66CC5CAA for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:55:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (smtp1.hushmail.com [65.39.178.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D622660 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D9866401AA for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:23:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w3.hushmail.com [65.39.178.62]) by smtp1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:23:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 70653C039D; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:23:00 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:23:00 +0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: opensmtpd: procmail: not found From: opendaddy@hushmail.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150126132300.70653C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:55:55 -0000 Hello! Trying to set up opensmtpd-5.4.2_4,1 with procmail-3.22_8 in FreeBSD. But why am I getting `Error ("procmail: not found")` in my maillog? # whereis procmail procmail: /usr/local/bin/procmail /usr/local/man/man1/procmail.1.gz /usr/ports/mail/procmail # tail /var/log/maillog Jan 26 14:03:00 mybox smtpd[23304]: delivery: TempFail for d597675f24cee290: from=, to=, user=od, method=mda, delay=4h3m, stat=Error ("procmail: not found") Jan 26 14:03:00 mybox smtpd[23304]: delivery: TempFail for e4140b5dd7ea72d6: from=, to=, user=od, method=mda, delay=6h3m, stat=Error ("procmail: not found") Jan 26 14:03:38 mybox smtpd[23304]: delivery: TempFail for 32dd47600d1932d6: from=, to=, user=root, method=mda, delay=10h2m5s, stat=Error (not allowed to deliver to: root) Jan 26 14:03:44 mybox smtpd[23304]: delivery: TempFail for a3eaad599787ed6d: from=, to=, user=root, method=mda, delay=10h2m5s, stat=Error (not allowed to deliver to: root) Jan 26 14:04:05 mybox smtpd[23304]: delivery: TempFail for 07046d21c7295fb5: from=, to=, user=od, method=mda, delay=3h4m5s, stat=Error ("procmail: not found") Jan 26 14:04:05 mybox smtpd[23304]: delivery: TempFail for b2a27ab830130533: from=, to=, user=od, method=mda, delay=13h4m5s, stat=Error ("procmail: not found") Jan 26 14:04:05 mybox smtpd[23304]: delivery: TempFail for c269a1e9e53cdbdf: from=, to=, user=od, method=mda, delay=13h4m5s, stat=Error ("procmail: not found") Jan 26 14:04:11 mybox smtpd[23304]: delivery: TempFail for 5763f68ddff9d148: from=<>, to=, user=od, method=mda, delay=5h10m5s, stat=Error ("procmail: not found") Jan 26 14:04:11 mybox smtpd[23304]: delivery: TempFail for 7c61aa15a65bf623: from=<>, to=, user=od, method=mda, delay=1h10m5s, stat=Error ("procmail: not found") Jan 26 14:05:20 mybox smtpd[23304]: delivery: TempFail for cf077883a36bcae2: from=, to=, user=od, method=mda, delay=1h5m20s, stat=Error ("procmail: not found") # cat /usr/local/etc/mail/smtpd.conf listen on 127.0.0.1 port 25 table aliases db:/etc/mail/aliases.db accept for local deliver to mda "/usr/local/bin/procmail -f -" accept from any for domain "mydomain.com" deliver to mda "/usr/local/bin/procmail -f -" accept from local for any relay Many thanks! O.D. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 14:11:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 501D2B5 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:11:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kirk-ext.obspm.fr (kirk-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.193.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.obspm.fr", Issuer "TERENA SSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D662C84A for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:11:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pcjas.obspm.fr (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by kirk-ext.obspm.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/DIO Observatoire de Paris - 15/04/10) with ESMTP id t0QEAZw9012538 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:10:36 +0100 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:10:52 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: Philip Keogh Subject: Re: mrsas on Dell R730 Message-ID: <20150126141052.GA25999@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <20150126133406.GA25856@pcjas.obspm.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (kirk-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.193.20]); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:10:36 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at kirk-ext.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:11:12 -0000 Le 26/01/2015 05:48:05-0800, Philip Keogh a crit > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Albert Shih wrote: > > Hi everyone. > > > > I've a new R730, and I just install FreeBSD 10.1 with mrsas driver for > > the raid card (the mfi don't works). > > > > Now the server is up and running I would like to known if they are any > > method to get the status of the raid card ? > > > > I just pull out one disk from the raid luns so the volume should be on > > degraded mode, but I don't see anywhere. No message on the dmesg. > > And through camcontrol I don't see how I can get the status. > > > > Regards. > > > > JAS > > > > Have you tried the MegaCli or MegaCli6? YEEESSSSSS.....it's working... Thanks. Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO btiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex France Tlphone : +33 1 45 07 76 26/+33 6 86 69 95 71 xmpp: jas@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: lun 26 jan 2015 15:09:06 CET From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 14:12:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DE671AD for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:12:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dnvrco-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.73.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE068906 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:12:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [204.210.114.114] ([204.210.114.114:64402] helo=localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com) by dnvrco-oedge03 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 95/18-06689-1AA46C45; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:09:38 +0000 Received: by localhost.hawaii.res.rr.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 145785CE4; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 04:14:29 -1000 (HST) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 04:14:28 -1000 From: parv To: opendaddy@hushmail.com Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found Message-ID: <20150126141428.GA43445@holstein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: opendaddy@hushmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20150126132300.70653C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150126132300.70653C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.64.142:25 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=dqxVCjQ4 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lLOF/jpPrR0dcgWXP1EvZg==:117 a=lLOF/jpPrR0dcgWXP1EvZg==:17 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=Ymsr-CWnAAAA:8 a=YNv0rlydsVwA:10 a=8c8-Wn2gAAAA:8 a=FH0sDxpYWAezHcED468A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:12:57 -0000 in message <20150126132300.70653C039D@smtp.hushmail.com>, wrote opendaddy@hushmail.com thusly... > > Hello! > > Trying to set up opensmtpd-5.4.2_4,1 with procmail-3.22_8 in > FreeBSD. But why am I getting `Error ("procmail: not found")` in > my maillog? > > # whereis procmail > procmail: /usr/local/bin/procmail /usr/local/man/man1/procmail.1.gz /usr/ports/mail/procmail Is procmail actually installed, for locate database could be old and thus whereis would be lying? What is the output of ... # whereis procmail | xargs ls -l ... ? > # tail /var/log/maillog > Jan 26 14:03:00 mybox smtpd[23304]: delivery: TempFail for \ > d597675f24cee290: from=, to=, user=od, \ > method=mda, delay=4h3m, stat=Error ("procmail: not found") ... Another possibility is that some command actually run by procmail is missing. -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 14:30:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BF44625 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kirk-ext.obspm.fr (kirk-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.193.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.obspm.fr", Issuer "TERENA SSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5590A90 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:30:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pcjas.obspm.fr (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by kirk-ext.obspm.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/DIO Observatoire de Paris - 15/04/10) with ESMTP id t0QEUPRI009203 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:30:26 +0100 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:30:42 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: pkg URL PACKAGESITE Message-ID: <20150126143042.GB25999@pcjas.obspm.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (kirk-ext.obspm.fr [145.238.193.20]); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:30:26 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at kirk-ext.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:30:30 -0000 Hi everyone. I'm running a poudriere on one server who build everything for me. I would like to create a mirror of this repository only a mirror of the package so, just another nginx/apache and a rsync. Is it possible to put two URL (knowning it's just a mirror) inside the pkg repository config ? So if one is down pkg use the other. Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO btiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex France Tlphone : +33 1 45 07 76 26/+33 6 86 69 95 71 xmpp: jas@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: lun 26 jan 2015 15:27:31 CET From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 14:44:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 587CD9CB for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30DC0C62 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D321933C1D; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:38:52 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 45DF939819; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:38:52 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Albert Shih Subject: Re: pkg URL PACKAGESITE References: <20150126143042.GB25999@pcjas.obspm.fr> Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:38:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20150126143042.GB25999@pcjas.obspm.fr> (Albert Shih's message of "Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:30:42 +0100") Message-ID: <44386xppxg.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:44:28 -0000 Albert Shih writes: > I would like to create a mirror of this repository only a mirror of the > package so, just another nginx/apache and a rsync. > > Is it possible to put two URL (knowning it's just a mirror) inside the pkg > repository config ? So if one is down pkg use the other. Give them different repository configs, and set the PRIORITY values in them. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 14:55:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A899AB5F for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E81FD59 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t0QEseS5023748 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:54:55 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t0QEseS5023748 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1422284096; bh=sq0iiu4uk4NNZ6OYIWtNWo9GKJ4qu+0rYxW3i7Dmbss=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Mon,=2026=20Jan=202015=2014:54:39=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-questi ons@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20pkg=20URL=20PACKAGESITE|Reference s:=20<20150126143042.GB25999@pcjas.obspm.fr>|In-Reply-To:=20<20150 126143042.GB25999@pcjas.obspm.fr>; b=kcKmpOqb2qjzqlverlF3BztMi4kR4tmunbbmq33mC4AIakQHOK3jZIIxW561o+cWr sjCky4ft2TulVzIGXSuM4eVEJm63i+fGB2A2lM5+Y+0qn3NLv+aQ+AUyenY0L2hdoW bQtwo6ycnw0VHtsDT4VrTV1eQPxyA6UI8CtVHVos= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <54C6552F.20004@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:54:39 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg URL PACKAGESITE References: <20150126143042.GB25999@pcjas.obspm.fr> In-Reply-To: <20150126143042.GB25999@pcjas.obspm.fr> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CnLQokfFXL5Wt2wbXRf1opnSnradGh2qL" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:55:07 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --CnLQokfFXL5Wt2wbXRf1opnSnradGh2qL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/26/15 14:30, Albert Shih wrote: > I'm running a poudriere on one server who build everything for me. >=20 > I would like to create a mirror of this repository only a mirror of the= > package so, just another nginx/apache and a rsync. >=20 > Is it possible to put two URL (knowning it's just a mirror) inside the = pkg > repository config ? So if one is down pkg use the other. This is what pkg+http:// or pkg+https// style URLs and MIRROR_TYPE=3DSRV are for. You create some SRV records in the DNS which resolve to the list of URLs you want your pkg repo to be available at. _http._tcp.pkg.example.com IN SRV 10 10 80 pkg1.example.com _http._tcp.pkg.example.com IN SRV 50 10 80 pkg2.example.com Check the docco on SRV records -- you can use the 'priority' field to direct traffic to one server primarily, and then try the other one if the first fails. Cheers, Matthew --CnLQokfFXL5Wt2wbXRf1opnSnradGh2qL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUxlUvXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnXisP/36zGNaCXM4w0jD9Tm2buAI8 P45Kk1ftBFtXfpIS6cv1r1h2D8cboQ/RvhV+TrmjNSUKOPSO6fysSC1lnYXZ3H8T clSAwfCp/fXwbdZcT1nx56Aw8cuX3QXWnK6ZOxv5419jBwK+tOzMXzaBdqx+jPJn nJEGR6PQ/f8Zn2tuZSshatKHZuaXycEcxBwzwBSKehoAb/Nxex9Wc+KdeXXEEdJq Y6Q/bDGTVWMDRGXxun0wRZ1lcoHg1wUjbqy96IjFQXMW0vWoQ2OfqyscHUAdxzQg 7nZ6n2Vgx+8Neq68aP++XPsc9f23oAkkL9H593Y8txm1Z9hxPN2reuuq8xvjjvup q8EkevbZh4IhHhmP5XUah9pVENTrPoLyRAWi7C/ecKDIaClQ3KoME/oPxhb7jNDc kogCj5pWthBvaL03SIhnPrBj03wHmpGRz9SoQC6EjJqFJ/GR8z8FDty/Wl0RqqCH lEPe5n+xBQFpMp90Zitb9h/FaeLasNjwSi4TmPljR79yI3qFYSpmCu/S2+/4dq+x ZJpaUE+QVRc3uiFotHYyhTeZkLesHCJPMdAs3F1QE3QB1zvs1XRPx2qQip2CW8an o1IBQY6pLcFU4euVPLjOZbwCKZAW2qEXDqqhQGfjHZNq41mbxReS8hWx+2igyCHu +gXAqFV8jJaVkpA0ndT6 =c4fZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CnLQokfFXL5Wt2wbXRf1opnSnradGh2qL-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 14:57:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3FEBCD5 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:57:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (smtp1.hushmail.com [65.39.178.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97043D76 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:57:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D92E401DC for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w3.hushmail.com [65.39.178.62]) by smtp1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 29F78C039D; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:56:59 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:56:58 +0000 To: "parv" Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found From: opendaddy@hushmail.com In-Reply-To: <20150126141428.GA43445@holstein.holy.cow> References: <20150126132300.70653C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126141428.GA43445@holstein.holy.cow> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150126145659.29F78C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, misc@opensmtpd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:57:00 -0000 Hi! On 26. januar 2015 at 2:02 PM, "parv" wrote: > >Is procmail actually installed, for locate database could be old >and thus whereis would be lying? What is the output of ... > > # whereis procmail | xargs ls -l Awesome man! Looks like locate is clueless: # whereis procmail | xargs ls -l ls: procmail:: No such file or directory -rwsr-sr-x 1 root mail 98224 Oct 3 04:19 /usr/local/bin/procmail -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10793 Oct 3 04:19 /usr/local/man/man1/procmail.1.gz Just ran: # /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb >>> WARNING >>> Executing updatedb as root. This WILL reveal all filenames >>> on your machine to all login users, which is a security risk. But I'm still getting `ls: procmail:: No such file or directory`. Ideas? Many thanks! O.D. > >> # tail /var/log/maillog >> Jan 26 14:03:00 mybox smtpd[23304]: delivery: TempFail for \ >> d597675f24cee290: from=, to=, user=od, \ >> method=mda, delay=4h3m, stat=Error ("procmail: not found") >... > >Another possibility is that some command actually run by procmail >is >missing. > > >-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 15:11:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA775EE1 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x235.google.com (mail-ig0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 818CAF45 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:11:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hn18so8770190igb.2 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 07:11:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=f7Nnb3j2SpPBFLUtQyHE/wsVLMPUB2dXcbQIGnN7wYc=; b=CKwKzk4nlLGwWVS5qIlSuTwuAjtot8f7h3Eamew+HE/DV2AEcd53/bSI9qTTa2Vfc9 viCswhgJumj/GjiOm4/ktbB/OZ1S9GBMAGLELXTEK7G43uMao03Npe/aHdQJ/xKTYLm4 71h8WNPvWUpCEKziHKiwIO89HuS/9Oz9Bg7wzYx75rvtxEqblPzrJ4H0elvoooN48sm0 APdF5v2Rg8QVJ8++L1elyCsFbxFzLNtnHuV8MHzvWQ3DvHWYV98qKGE1t24GvePe5w8J +hOXnsrMWbEvBI1EluQgr3yNmKMlaWG21LNRk1mwHH6hsmw6QZFbogkHA7Wp6T7pvn3k xRIg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.94.79 with SMTP id a15mr21076234icn.30.1422285092863; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 07:11:32 -0800 (PST) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.225.38 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 07:11:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:11:32 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2w-iXjRNZVxLUixyU4oFljIoCdw Message-ID: Subject: Source Build Question From: Rick Miller To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:11:33 -0000 Hi all, The output below is an excerpt from 2 source builds of the same source (releng/10.0) on 2 different hosts. The obvious difference is "all" vs "depend", but what exactly does this signify and does it impact the performance of a build? /*** Source build, Host 1 ***/ ===> lib/clang/libllvmanalysis (all) ===> lib/clang/libllvmarchive (all) ===> lib/clang/libllvmasmparser (all) ===> lib/clang/libllvmasmprinter (all) ===> lib/clang/libllvmbitreader (all) ===> lib/clang/libllvmbitwriter (all) /*** Source build, Host 2 ***/ ===> lib/clang/libllvmanalysis (depend) ===> lib/clang/libllvmarchive (depend) ===> lib/clang/libllvmasmparser (depend) ===> lib/clang/libllvmasmprinter (depend) ===> lib/clang/libllvmbitreader (depend) ===> lib/clang/libllvmbitwriter (depend) -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 15:35:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8421275 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (smtp3.hushmail.com [65.39.178.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC020208 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 781FBE0230 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w3.hushmail.com [65.39.178.62]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 563E7C0392; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:00:30 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:00:30 +0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?U1BBTTog6Ieq5Yqo5Zue5aSN77yab3BlbnNtdHBkOiBwcm9jbWFpbDogbm90IGZvdW5k?= From: opendaddy@hushmail.com In-Reply-To: <20150126135613.D9B7DD718AF@agent01.agent.vmail.yz.sinanode.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150126150030.563E7C0392@smtp.hushmail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:35:54 -0000 On 26. januar 2015 at 1:49 PM, jzsf@vip.sina.com wrote: > >已收到您的来信！ > 谢谢！ > 荆州盛发 Anybody else getting bombarded with these every time they post to questions? O.D. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 15:47:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0E47635 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:47:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 555E8358 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:47:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t0QFlS3C024858 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:47:28 GMT (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=freebsd.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t0QFlS3C024858 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t0QFlS3C024858; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <54C66190.5020101@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:47:28 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Source Build Question References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x4XXeeaPV2mpXcFkPOKFUx52VEeevpWgh" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:47:38 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --x4XXeeaPV2mpXcFkPOKFUx52VEeevpWgh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/26/15 15:11, Rick Miller wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > The output below is an excerpt from 2 source builds of the same source > (releng/10.0) on 2 different hosts. The obvious difference is "all" vs= > "depend", but what exactly does this signify and does it impact the > performance of a build? >=20 > /*** Source build, Host 1 ***/ > =3D=3D=3D> lib/clang/libllvmanalysis (all) > =3D=3D=3D> lib/clang/libllvmarchive (all) > =3D=3D=3D> lib/clang/libllvmasmparser (all) > =3D=3D=3D> lib/clang/libllvmasmprinter (all) > =3D=3D=3D> lib/clang/libllvmbitreader (all) > =3D=3D=3D> lib/clang/libllvmbitwriter (all) >=20 > /*** Source build, Host 2 ***/ > =3D=3D=3D> lib/clang/libllvmanalysis (depend) > =3D=3D=3D> lib/clang/libllvmarchive (depend) > =3D=3D=3D> lib/clang/libllvmasmparser (depend) > =3D=3D=3D> lib/clang/libllvmasmprinter (depend) > =3D=3D=3D> lib/clang/libllvmbitreader (depend) > =3D=3D=3D> lib/clang/libllvmbitwriter (depend) >=20 If you're starting from a pristine, newly checked-out source tree in /usr/src and an empty /usr/obj in both cases, then you should see the 'depend' target getting processed fairly early in the build. It's analysing each file of C code to find what headers each depends on. Once this analysis has been done, and the results saved to '.depend' files scattered around various directories under /usr/obj, then there's no need to repeat that step unless any of the C code files are newer (ie. more recently modified) than the generated .depend files. On second and subsequent builds in the same source tree, you may not see the depends being processed again. A simple 'make clean' doesn't (IIRC) remove the generated .depend files -- for that you need to run 'make cleandir ; make cleandir' (Yes, the same thing twice.) or destroying and recreating /usr/obj some other way. It's often faster to have that as a separate partition, and then drop and recreate the filesystem on it than to go around deleting all the files in that directory tree. Cheers, Matthew --x4XXeeaPV2mpXcFkPOKFUx52VEeevpWgh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUxmGQXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnsJsP/3L8XWWcht1faMjGmqmgM5CW qytXnwMcngan109n7Oh3LD9hclnQ5tsGQHeLbNeq0IRh8gHYtlj4Xstuz4kPCbK5 m439bARw1BPoHaaIbSrJXwRUl70KXVpiOJ0y8KTJ5d/lmqkoKZ3R6gb7Lvl/+y/i 1rMaZDfkb6K9UbFfYa5pwGHK+5Lj6E+1f8YZjFb+/YfCZrdcROmRPj3PKeK6RGw1 LDoOvrWBglYK8qnxvQ/0Y2Bq4u5q/rjgYxC03DpDYHhiyjrZyPuAzeATMDVuLk3s JIEMnVMzbGE27iMR/LI+Mz/+dVcOiKN+bPn180in/xrwhY2CzSdciUKKNnW6bJSc Ze5/cdE0xAstWOvSaVEe9y16u5DQgqcACwbtvbEH/B9QPsFi/d513Xn/5kYTTDiG oEvYQZt+/+KEwlnmvFsO7nmfr8Wn9HQ7pTChGWK3ianV6gx/VF8ASe+C2qrgkbCS WcKZyRqFFAY6Vs9PTYTNoOjFV5ANwYszA7xoKMx0uAAJzBGhGC9UlNDNin7bkVoM z2u4azJMhmzFX0kcA8QxGf6liHFGGtet94RanvOAc1KzeloJS4PlTCXZfCngN4lh 9MXCteI6pt1MHU3o9UMFMmpv/Lqk4fLHclz1unMyYKSJ86akqYQ7ckuXFxDR/CeY +7xr8QFdPPiaZvEK9L++ =M43J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --x4XXeeaPV2mpXcFkPOKFUx52VEeevpWgh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 15:52:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC67A74D for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baobab.bilink.net (baobab.bilink.net [212.45.144.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7818E623 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:52:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baobab.bilink.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3kWFlF0XzJzRRrx for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:45:13 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mcs.it Received: from baobab.bilink.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (baobab.mcs.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 11027) with ESMTP id xc3k83UGRBxa for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:45:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from hermes.mcs.it (hermes.mcs.it [192.168.132.21]) by baobab.bilink.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3kWFlD70VnzRRrw for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:45:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from mordeus (unknown [192.168.44.6]) by hermes.mcs.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761781B7580 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:45:12 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:45:16 +0100 From: Luciano Mannucci To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Simple NAT X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) X-Face: 4qPv4GNcD; h<7Q/sK>+GqF4=CR@KmnPkSmwd+#%\F`4yjKO3"C]p'z=(oWRnsYBQGM\5g:4skqQY0NnV'dM:Mm:^/_+I@a"; [-s=ogufdF"9ggQ'=y MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <3kWFlD70VnzRRrw@baobab.bilink.it> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 15:52:27 -0000 Hello, I have a freebsd machine (FreeBSD troika 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0 r274401) with openvpn that works like a charm :-)... I wish to nat one and only one of my openvpn clients, possibly for a single destination. What's the better way to avoid disturbing the rest of the operations? Any clues? Is IPFW my friend? Thanks for the patience, luciano. -- /"\ /Via A. Salaino, 7 - 20144 Milano (Italy) \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN / PHONE : +39 2 485781 FAX: +39 2 48578250 X AGAINST HTML MAIL / E-MAIL: posthamster@sublink.sublink.ORG / \ AND POSTINGS / WWW: http://www.lesassaie.IT/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 16:00:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30E9B914 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:00:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3221695 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0QG0G4I004799 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:00:16 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t0QG0GR9004796; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:00:16 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:00:16 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Scott Bennett Subject: Re: buildworld, buildkernel, and devel/cache In-Reply-To: <201501261245.t0QCjUMD009768@sdf.org> Message-ID: References: <201501261245.t0QCjUMD009768@sdf.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:00:16 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:00:25 -0000 On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Scott Bennett wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:24:22 +0200 Ivan Klymenko wrote: >>> In /root/.profile I have >>> >>> CCACHE_DIR=/buildwork/ccache >>> export PATH=/usr/local/libexec/ccache:$PATH >>> export CCACHE_PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin >>> >>> In /root/.cshrc.extensions, a file I source from /root/.cshrc, I have >>> >>> setenv CCACHE_DIR /buildwork/ccache >>> setenv PATH /usr/local/libexec/ccache:$PATH >>> setenv CCACHE_PATH /usr/bin:/usr/local/bin >>> >> This file is in some ways you can >> help /usr/local/share/doc/ccache/ccache-howto-freebsd.txt > > I had read that and hadn't seen how that would work, but after seeing > your reply, I tried adding the three lines to /etc/make.conf and got errors, > like I had expected: > > make: "/etc/make.conf" line 18: Missing dependency operator > make: RE substitution error: repetition-operator operand invalid > make: Unclosed substitution for CXX (, missing) > make: "/etc/make.conf" line 20: Undefined variable "${CXX:C,^c++,/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/c++,1}" > make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue > make: stopped in /usr/src > > So my question remains. Please respond if you have something that > you have tried and know works. > Thanks in advance. They are shell variables, so set them in the shell, .cshrc or the two alternatives mentioned above. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 16:31:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6833E536 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:31:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C5F7B34 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-45.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.45]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0QGV76e020499 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:31:07 -0600 Message-ID: <54C66D42.4040402@hiwaay.net> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:37:22 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: 425 security bad ip connecting Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:31:15 -0000 I get the above or '425 Failed to establish connection' recently (today) when trying to connect to ftp://ftp.gtlib.gatech.edu to look for *BSD ISO's .... This has worked OK in the past (late last year) .... I am using FireFox & tor to try to connect, as I have done for years now (actually years w/ firefox, months w/ tor in the mix) .... firefox-33.0,1, FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5, tor-0.2.4.24. I did a pkg upgrade in late Dec.2014, but have used ftp connections through FF since then .... Any clues appreciated, any more info gladly provided .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 16:34:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 415B0746 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:34:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.52.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE27B70 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:34:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id 50DF8CB8C9C; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:34:11 -0600 (CST) Received: from 128.135.70.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:34:11 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <31948.128.135.70.2.1422290051.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <20150126150030.563E7C0392@smtp.hushmail.com> References: <20150126150030.563E7C0392@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:34:11 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: SPAM: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=E8=87=AA=E5=8A=A8=E5=9B=9E=E5=A4=8D=EF=BC=9Aopensmtpd:_pr?= ocmail: not found From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: opendaddy@hushmail.com Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:34:19 -0000 On Mon, January 26, 2015 9:00 am, opendaddy@hushmail.com wrote: > On 26. januar 2015 at 1:49 PM, jzsf@vip.sina.com wrote: >> >>已收到您的来信！ >> 谢谢！ >> 荆州盛发 > > Anybody else getting bombarded with these every time they post to > questions? > > O.D. > We had discussion once about spam with "From:" line containing sina.com once in this list. Basically spam was sent to the list after majority of first messages starting new thread. There were variety of suggestions asking admins of list or even admins of MX to block whole ranges of IPs assigned to the same owner as spam originating IP. Yes, it is I who is that nasty ;-) - this is what I do on my mail servers (after always unsuccessful attempts to contact abuse@that.domain then postmaster@that.domain). It looks like admins of the list did fair job in mitigating that, THANKS! If the originating blocks of IPs were blocked (and mail To: addresses in these blocks is not being sent through mail lists), then bad guys must have some different e-mail address subscribed to the list, and a script parsing messages to extract sender, then add it to spam database. That would be my guess. In this case none of this junk will come through main list, but (some of) the list members will get spam from it which seems to be your case. If I had to solve what is happening to you, I would start rejecting mail from blocks of IPs spam originates (if you have to have your server comply RFCs, you may need to contact domain authorities with abuse complaint first - someone more knowledgeable will correct me). I probably am lucky to have already blocked the origin. Valeri PS Someone deciphered content once and said it is innocent "vacation" autoresponse in Chinese. I personally don't find it innocent neither to have autoresponse sent to mail list, nor the message (even a signature) sent to some mail list in foreign language. Foreign, being different from mail list language. I can write in at least two different languages which will be foreign for this list. I will consider it fair if I will be kicked by people for it if I ever do that ;-) ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 16:53:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BD74AAC for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:53:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13D75D57 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:53:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t0QGquMY026258 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:52:57 GMT (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=freebsd.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t0QGquMY026258 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t0QGquMY026258; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <54C670E1.9030306@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:52:49 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 425 security bad ip connecting References: <54C66D42.4040402@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <54C66D42.4040402@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5adHnC9dVWndOSUHqhhmXVdWUn3nuqEh8" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:53:08 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --5adHnC9dVWndOSUHqhhmXVdWUn3nuqEh8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/26/15 16:37, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > I get the above or '425 Failed to establish connection' recently (today= ) > when trying to connect to ftp://ftp.gtlib.gatech.edu to look for *BSD > ISO's ....=20 Looks like some sort of network connectivity problem, probably temporarily causing packet loss. What a few hours and try again: with luch either you'll get a different route through the Tor network avoiding the problems, or the underlying cause will have been fixed. > This has worked OK in the past (late last year) .... I am > using FireFox & tor to try to connect, as I have done for years now > (actually years w/ firefox, months w/ tor in the mix) .... > firefox-33.0,1, FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5, tor-0.2.4.24. I did a pkg > upgrade in late Dec.2014, but have used ftp connections through FF sinc= e > then .... Any clues appreciated, any more info gladly provided .... Why not ftp://ftp.freebsd.org -- which will give you an FTP server close to your exit point from tor ? Plus I believe the deal now is that you should be using the 'Tor browser' -- which is a copy of an older version of Firefox, with patches and other anonymity stuff already built in, rather than the old method of applying patches to a regular FF install. Cheers, Matthew --5adHnC9dVWndOSUHqhhmXVdWUn3nuqEh8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUxnDhXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnvigP/3VBaxcx1f5i2IB2l6ywpe/f VKUHvKyEw2eFIX2LQv5HGLMag+ipa2KO5zU4KYHvykgbBFwkwei2cLtj16E+BaLz vlugvQEquiNCTyzBn3+Cs/aR5OEal2whtcHbWwxf9KSl+K97Yad4vo64waGXM3d5 +Ux9I6hb8+x8hKAADk2NP6X6ulA46MOMMniZwJQGH7rju3FU2mgLnwMCvdCzIDPR 4o1tFDQ/yx5gPQp/UnEvToq+PNG0DKsPZL5bt45NpIww/6VMZVubJl1vSYAlqIxO UbVdFtOHZz4e81kTOLGHgovE738apAxLF1dg/nlgJJbGIN+g9mt4ouZHllICLpiC XGt0++DDHMZFKzj69dXK/A2tvv95ACbZ/tqn0HT5RzTAu5e9foVNrHsf5sOGh3UA ZRRpr4b+a3H8djN1Ti7szC1etqwlVgX2yuG8vM7NoUC0NF/0GwAwHcJQU+G6jNJb hQ+yW9fB7gutInEHK+hh9WVviWYrlt502TFPch/HtlMIIM7ojOVhXcRCQPN3M+gW wZSsRqL0pO2fTdeVBAS0Mz8zfmkOm/g9oRSEz2SraqoT3cXlOj70MTxUeNR8vHMf bHT4Ip7PsY/DD/gFFW7nWZg2qGtWc1sRYG4erq4AtUjKZ/+W1tY8KqfD71LhQZ3C SuQr+vHFCRMA5trAmGT3 =JMnP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5adHnC9dVWndOSUHqhhmXVdWUn3nuqEh8-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 16:58:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F365BD0 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:58:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA8A8D9F for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:58:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-45.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.45]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0QGwn8A007468 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:58:49 -0600 Message-ID: <54C673C0.6080800@hiwaay.net> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:05:04 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 425 security bad ip connecting References: <54C66D42.4040402@hiwaay.net> <54C670E1.9030306@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <54C670E1.9030306@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:58:51 -0000 On 01/26/15 10:52, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 01/26/15 16:37, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> I get the above or '425 Failed to establish connection' recently (today) >> when trying to connect to ftp://ftp.gtlib.gatech.edu to look for *BSD >> ISO's .... > Looks like some sort of network connectivity problem, probably > temporarily causing packet loss. What a few hours and try again: with > luch either you'll get a different route through the Tor network > avoiding the problems, or the underlying cause will have been fixed. > >> This has worked OK in the past (late last year) .... I am >> using FireFox & tor to try to connect, as I have done for years now >> (actually years w/ firefox, months w/ tor in the mix) .... >> firefox-33.0,1, FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5, tor-0.2.4.24. I did a pkg >> upgrade in late Dec.2014, but have used ftp connections through FF since >> then .... Any clues appreciated, any more info gladly provided .... > Why not ftp://ftp.freebsd.org -- which will give you an FTP server close > to your exit point from tor ? Good point, I'll look there .... > > Plus I believe the deal now is that you should be using the 'Tor > browser' -- which is a copy of an older version of Firefox, with patches > and other anonymity stuff already built in, rather than the old method > of applying patches to a regular FF install. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > The Tor-browser isn't ported to 9.3R as of late Dec.2014 .... I probably wouldn't mind using it, but don't particularly want to have to wrestle it on-board (i.e. compile it up from scratch, fix issues, etc.), getting lazy in my old age :-/ .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 17:01:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51C76C99 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:01:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03BC8E56 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-45.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.45]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0QH1uBY009627 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:01:57 -0600 Message-ID: <54C6747B.4050400@hiwaay.net> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:08:11 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 425 security bad ip connecting References: <54C66D42.4040402@hiwaay.net> <54C670E1.9030306@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <54C670E1.9030306@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:01:58 -0000 On 01/26/15 10:52, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Why notftp://ftp.freebsd.org -- which will give you an FTP server close > to your exit point from tor ? just tried it, same thing :-/ .... (actually tried ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/9.3/, was gonna page back up to different arch's) -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 17:44:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E7B957C for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:44:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from james.speedmail.se (james.speedmail.se [46.59.72.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1C682E4 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:43:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from james.speedmail.se (james [46.59.72.75]) by james.speedmail.se (Postfix/submission) with ESMTPA id CB857409EE for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:34:59 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:34:59 +0100 From: knerking@speedmail.se To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: installing perl::SDL from cpan fails when compiling c-source Message-ID: <498de408968c66b1ddd8fdcc28d7e306@speedmail.se> X-Sender: knerking@speedmail.se User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:44:00 -0000 Hi, it fails when Alien::SDL is trying to compile SDL_pango. (a part of SDL) It's just c-source and it compiles with mingw on Windows. Can it be the compiler used by FreeBSD? I installed gcc, but it made no difference.. regards Mix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 18:25:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90099B8E for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:25:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (mail-ob0-f175.google.com [209.85.214.175]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C66B90A for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:25:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id wp4so9197156obc.6 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:25:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=4haoepqzU+FXFkpyH/TXhRwnwmJawR/fp487zEeBeM8=; b=Wd/Jq8BzwUdoQncJ1VPd/zte9/n2RZhSPELFIqGzZ83yvF/YSiVYiIqY6skN/1T6wB Xiqgf0d88rQ3HsobN3GWrLL5TNpn6ZbJyXjrNDNXXtQkMbJHu/S+W4kxwAmtwnQthuUw OGTuxLMRLaRp1S1So7MZkP9OBqrCQiQya4PIWKOWOti+YMQZViX57cOk6qQ10T24z5fs vuLMIDMDgoGupX+YgLIhZOUseitskxheohnljqOMpDTvpz3MlFTbfmxh09YlrF7fqt9q 5vDOSqEH0OKsBOOldne7J96IMsCOMgvJpgxzE1pTZD/L/6C/iG/0Yqo6vEhVIVnEa3zX 6X3A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn0urRtMbn38xI4EsogkBsppBLIZMYNBz4O/cuBQDqAvDFustoECDGADxvK11pJBg5W0jLk MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.234.15 with SMTP id ua15mr13505044obc.77.1422296737650; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:25:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.51.196 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:25:37 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [93.221.163.124] Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:25:37 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: [Semi-OT] SFF-8087 to eSata? From: "C. P. Ghost" To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:25:44 -0000 Hello, I'm trying to connect an external enclosure for SATA drives which comes with a single eSata connector for 8 drives in JBOD mode on one side (it's an IcyBox IB-3680SU3) to an HBA which comes with 2 external SFF-8087 connectors for 4 drives each (that's an Avago SAS HBA 9207-8e, which supports up to 1024 HDDs according to specs). I'm trying to set up an external ZFS pool on those 8 drives. Now, I'm wondering what kind of cable or cable wizardry I need to get both SFF-8087 with the single JBOD eSata port connected. Is that possible at all? I'm not that familiar with that setup. Any help or hints appreciated. Thanks, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 18:35:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 552BF11C for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:35:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22e.google.com (mail-ie0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1945EA2F for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:35:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f174.google.com with SMTP id vy18so10459439iec.5 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:35:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qZ8h4kXg4kt45hnW4kF8kyMq10ZEVeqC3BCMS2ykMqE=; b=kcA4paxgRTUldoblZXWRu66DRdteEboI5KW8wXUXOlwXc+DMAA4dx9Xb7B9m2GF7I6 tbe+al+wCPAHcJBCqyqZd9wTqH4ENv1xtNnSnm81tTywPI7Rx1WN72/iph9Pbu1MjU6m wWmljJEAXcw0jB3KUhWjmROSUEIvwS8IsmOIW2RfOCBlhg0/+1HBw3cyOoodO7luXYXO oK5mkO95y309GRsTv6jkwgZbMIyHBzF2VeCLmtbHWPZ9MXGATncWdXBBRLsSea4+dSPX l90siAGIs2znuZOAUPmqZDTllU77pQ70+2r4NvfhZhViaeWzYt80mYiQtyDIQrzGhuls 1k1g== X-Received: by 10.50.25.166 with SMTP id d6mr17767315igg.41.1422297342428; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:35:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([73.3.70.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s94sm6315945ioe.40.2015.01.26.10.35.41 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:35:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54C688FC.4070209@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 11:35:40 -0700 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Semi-OT] SFF-8087 to eSata? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:35:43 -0000 On 01/26/2015 11:25 AM, C. P. Ghost wrote: > HBA which comes with 2 external SFF-8087 connectors > for 4 drives each (that's an Avago SAS HBA 9207-8e, which > supports up to 1024 HDDs according to specs). I'm trying to understand your statement above. You say each external sff supports 4 drives, yet you say the HBA supports 1024 drives. So, where are all the rest of the ports of the HBA? I know of eSATA chipset that understands when it is connected (via a single connector) to a disk farm. Does you ssf port understand it is connected to a disk farm box? If yes, can you configure your hba to make it talk to a multi-disk (i.e. more than 4 disks) farm via one of the ssf ports? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 18:43:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5245430E for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "SDF.ORG" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28EF3B26 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:43:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:bennett@otaku.freeshell.org [192.94.73.9]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0QIhXfm022509 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:43:34 GMT Received: (from bennett@localhost) by sdf.org (8.14.8/8.12.8/Submit) id t0QIhX78006200; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:43:33 -0600 (CST) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <201501261843.t0QIhX78006200@sdf.org> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:43:33 -0600 To: wblock@wonkity.com Subject: Re: buildworld, buildkernel, and devel/cache References: <201501261245.t0QCjUMD009768@sdf.org> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 6/20/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:43:40 -0000 On Mon., 27 January 2015, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Scott Bennett wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:24:22 +0200 Ivan Klymenko wrote: > >>> In /root/.profile I have > >>> > >>> CCACHE_DIR=/buildwork/ccache > >>> export PATH=/usr/local/libexec/ccache:$PATH > >>> export CCACHE_PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin > >>> > >>> In /root/.cshrc.extensions, a file I source from /root/.cshrc, I have > >>> > >>> setenv CCACHE_DIR /buildwork/ccache > >>> setenv PATH /usr/local/libexec/ccache:$PATH > >>> setenv CCACHE_PATH /usr/bin:/usr/local/bin > >>> > >> This file is in some ways you can > >> help /usr/local/share/doc/ccache/ccache-howto-freebsd.txt > > > > I had read that and hadn't seen how that would work, but after seeing > > your reply, I tried adding the three lines to /etc/make.conf and got errors, > > like I had expected: > > > > make: "/etc/make.conf" line 18: Missing dependency operator > > make: RE substitution error: repetition-operator operand invalid > > make: Unclosed substitution for CXX (, missing) > > make: "/etc/make.conf" line 20: Undefined variable "${CXX:C,^c++,/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/c++,1}" > > make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue > > make: stopped in /usr/src > > > > So my question remains. Please respond if you have something that > > you have tried and know works. > > Thanks in advance. > > They are shell variables, so set them in the shell, .cshrc or the two > alternatives mentioned above. Well, the instructions in that file say, To use ccache for base add the following to /etc/make.conf. You can replace cc and c++ with the compilers of your choice. (re- member that only GCC and Clang can build world and kernel) && exists(/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc) CC:=${CC:C,^cc,/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc,1} CXX:=${CXX:C,^c++,/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/c++,1} which was why I had put those three lines into /etc/make.conf. On your suggestion, I moved them to /root/.profile and /root/.cshrc.extensions, with the results that in the csh case, I got (as expected) the Badly placed ()'s. error. sh gave no errors, so I started a buildworld, which has been running for a little while already, but with no evidence to be found (e.g., no counters increasing in "ccache -s" output, no ccache seen running in top, the only instances of ccache in lastcomm(1) output are the ones I entered manually to check the counters) that ccache is being used by buildworld at all. I have not yet tried any ports updates to see whether addition of those three lines to .profile had any adverse effect upon that process. Thanks for the try, though. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at sdf.org *xor* bennett at freeshell.org * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 18:44:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FF683A2 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f49.google.com (mail-oi0-f49.google.com [209.85.218.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE688B39 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:44:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f49.google.com with SMTP id a3so8595724oib.8 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:43:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7Re6hdw+2h7h+JEwCqbDhjPJixGPKoqeL1BFj+FxJQc=; b=Z+ntNVpqrO3vvIXil7SXYofxPmJO7gH4DbYbmPw8z6CQ0BgbwXCXtvNrZ7Spd6hZKR staPDqeL0YAAtuOmcI+cjYxCWPY3jXYUAjdHKpitJqPBVHnvbppj4SvGXeXGK930gfC7 MpDYLbxfdE/L94qBCuHwuWkcpt0FQWmS2F60oGhpL5kbl5GKC3FEr2Atxj5e9mczZ0gT Q/En9aDLhkQ+7ApOJa1IQJiq3mRprVotY6Pqeq3Tjwo9AS6zXGhvXQ5j8r2x4JHlk8Bm oZ2X+VldjW8YfiZER4NJ/kFh4xCo+oFE63OdqB3K3f9G40vJGxAR8SMJKSQglZPvIXHk wXoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm8qlJcSLdPm7zbAKQ3CazYxLN74u5U3HbckcLpt4qhjP2pV5sQct++0d7IFGIIPb240QS0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.230.6 with SMTP id su6mr13833656oec.44.1422297837194; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:43:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.51.196 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:43:57 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [93.221.163.124] In-Reply-To: <54C688FC.4070209@gmail.com> References: <54C688FC.4070209@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:43:57 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Semi-OT] SFF-8087 to eSata? From: "C. P. Ghost" To: jd1008 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:44:05 -0000 On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:35 PM, jd1008 wrote: > > On 01/26/2015 11:25 AM, C. P. Ghost wrote: > >> HBA which comes with 2 external SFF-8087 connectors >> for 4 drives each (that's an Avago SAS HBA 9207-8e, which >> supports up to 1024 HDDs according to specs). >> > I'm trying to understand your statement above. > You say each external sff supports 4 drives, yet > you say the HBA supports 1024 drives. > So, where are all the rest of the ports of the HBA? > Hello, I assume they mean 1024 with SATA expanders. AFAICS, it's 4 drives per SFF-8087 connector, if it's directly connected to 4 drives. > I know of eSATA chipset that understands when it > is connected (via a single connector) to a disk farm. > > Does you ssf port understand it is connected to a > disk farm box? If yes, can you configure your hba > to make it talk to a multi-disk (i.e. more than 4 disks) > farm via one of the ssf ports? > I'll have to try it as soon as I'm in front of that box (give or take a few days). If the SFF port can talk to multidisk, would a SFF-to-eSATA cable (if there's such a thing) do the job? That's not an optimum setup for sure, but it's for cold storage anyway. As long as all drives can be accessed through the SFF port albeit slower than directly attached, that's okay with me and the owner of that machine. You've got to wonder what weird setups some people come up with... *laughing*. Thanks, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 20:25:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A8379A6 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:25:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oslo.ath.cx (oslo.ath.cx [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:42e4::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "oslo.ath.cx", Issuer "oslo.ath.cx" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6AFC8CA for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oslo.ath.cx (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id ba621472; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:25:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:25:02 +0100 From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: opendaddy@hushmail.com Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found Message-ID: <20150126202502.GA40007@oslo.ath.cx> References: <20150126132300.70653C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126141428.GA43445@holstein.holy.cow> <20150126145659.29F78C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150126145659.29F78C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, misc@opensmtpd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:25:06 -0000 On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 02:56:58PM +0000, opendaddy@hushmail.com wrote: > Hi! > > On 26. januar 2015 at 2:02 PM, "parv" wrote: > > > >Is procmail actually installed, for locate database could be old > >and thus whereis would be lying? What is the output of ... > > > > # whereis procmail | xargs ls -l > > Awesome man! Looks like locate is clueless: > > # whereis procmail | xargs ls -l > ls: procmail:: No such file or directory > -rwsr-sr-x 1 root mail 98224 Oct 3 04:19 /usr/local/bin/procmail > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10793 Oct 3 04:19 /usr/local/man/man1/procmail.1.gz > > Just ran: > > # /usr/libexec/locate.updatedb > >>> WARNING > >>> Executing updatedb as root. This WILL reveal all filenames > >>> on your machine to all login users, which is a security risk. > > But I'm still getting `ls: procmail:: No such file or directory`. Ideas? To understand why you get this error run: % whereis procmail | xargs -t ls -l or % whereis procmail | xargs -t -n1 ls -l Do you have a .forward file in $HOME with the content "|procmail"? -- Herbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 20:37:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A39942F7 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64A45A31 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-61-84.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.61.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C96724ADD; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:36:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t0QKawSK002131; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:36:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:36:58 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Luciano Mannucci Subject: Re: Simple NAT Message-Id: <20150126213658.48423c08.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <3kWFlD70VnzRRrw@baobab.bilink.it> References: <3kWFlD70VnzRRrw@baobab.bilink.it> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:37:08 -0000 On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:45:16 +0100, Luciano Mannucci wrote: > I have a freebsd machine (FreeBSD troika 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE #0 > r274401) with openvpn that works like a charm :-)... > I wish to nat one and only one of my openvpn clients, possibly for a > single destination. What's the better way to avoid disturbing the rest > of the operations? > Any clues? > Is IPFW my friend? Yes, that should work. In /etc/rc.conf, set natd_enable="YES" natd_interface="xl0" where "xl0" is the "outer" interface. In your custom /etc/ipfw.conf, add the rule add divert natd ip from any to any via xl0 and refine the "from any to any" part to reflect the IP addresses (and maybe specific ports) for the connection you want to translate, so the rule will only allow for that _one_ destination you want to enable. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 20:43:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D73842F for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:43:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from james.speedmail.se (james.speedmail.se [46.59.72.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1295B1D for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:43:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from james.speedmail.se (james [46.59.72.75]) by james.speedmail.se (Postfix/submission) with ESMTPA id 5C7E242155 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:43:35 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:43:35 +0100 From: knerking@speedmail.se To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: installing perl::SDL from cpan fails when compiling c-source In-Reply-To: <498de408968c66b1ddd8fdcc28d7e306@speedmail.se> References: <498de408968c66b1ddd8fdcc28d7e306@speedmail.se> Message-ID: <22508d3d992328a17c24797bee9f2f48@speedmail.se> X-Sender: knerking@speedmail.se User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:43:38 -0000 2015-01-26 18:34 skrev knerking@speedmail.se: > Hi, > > it fails when Alien::SDL is trying to compile SDL_pango. (a part of SDL) > > It's just c-source and it compiles with mingw on Windows. Can it be the > compiler > > used by FreeBSD? I installed gcc, but it made no difference.. > > regards Mix > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions [1] > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" For others trying: I solved this by installing the binary SDL-libs with pkg, before installing the perl::SDL module But it does not explain why the source could not be compiled.. /Mix Links: ------ [1] http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 21:24:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BA5F5F6 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.bein.link (bein.link [37.252.124.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36AFC81 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thinkpad.localnet (home.bein.link [172.16.32.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bein.link (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7BEA1AF182; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:16:42 +0000 (UTC) From: Maxim Filimonov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Polytropon Subject: Re: Simple NAT Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:16:35 +0300 Message-ID: <355611034.aCCaRRifNT@thinkpad> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.2 (FreeBSD/10.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.14.2; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20150126213658.48423c08.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <3kWFlD70VnzRRrw@baobab.bilink.it> <20150126213658.48423c08.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart3625970.RkfLBurhZK"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Luciano Mannucci X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:24:37 -0000 --nextPart3625970.RkfLBurhZK Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Monday 26 January 2015 21:36:58 Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:45:16 +0100, Luciano Mannucci wrote: > > I have a freebsd machine (FreeBSD troika 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-= RELEASE > > #0 r274401) with openvpn that works like a charm :-)... > > I wish to nat one and only one of my openvpn clients, possibly for = a > > single destination. What's the better way to avoid disturbing the r= est > > of the operations? > > Any clues? > > Is IPFW my friend? >=20 > Yes, that should work. In /etc/rc.conf, set >=20 > =09natd_enable=3D"YES" > =09natd_interface=3D"xl0" >=20 Why use natd, when ipfw can do kernel NAT? Just do the following: ipfw nat 1 config if log reset same_ports=20 ipfw add 00011 nat 1 ip from / to any out xmit=20 ipfw add 00012 nat 1 ip from any to in recv And replace , , , with the= =20 appropriate values. =2D-=20 wbr, Maxim Filimonov --nextPart3625970.RkfLBurhZK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJUxq6zAAoJEFvTvdclWgYFmaQQAIFnDgT1s7Fd7qBPzdNALfW8 +b3SgugjaLWi6UUdStG/6z7MXTQ63Pf77Cgk4oeHCNiQnYO2+8AytYQ9HMX904z6 R0tDNaKUFwE+FOPVk0pOMJNzvdOleDsbKeCSSO6DsfDxYTMxDn0MIraPAVgSXLX+ P3F9ZpVx1Nqg6MZyMfUdZhE08JaWw4G+HEeYvn9fPVAP/c8zurW6sp+SuVE5WXXT xvEeecs/4YFWiCSzwSGtjhUor9bESYS/1frxya7fhl3JMTs7TUV4OPXphF/9+FY0 IUsWIcKxy4f/OD/96aVxFzCQmDTil3aiGRsWG/RWLvoMaM25TY4zOy2W0h2h5scC ppb9EY22D+f011X8WhO1m7FQup+edA3di1gFNxHiQw5W+q6mHOH+RTdC6E7FGe9G mUb5t3nu7qX1NPKtuoy70ubXhf+kuXxXNy6kgjaYYA4meIDieM5v/1QLFA6hvvpn KXOeW9mIWn877PD1exIG2qEWvxtI6Lcu/3Tl2+udzYbF8rOzHl3kaGpVc71uQ1R/ OpW4VNty7ytEiWDwgP8juU0qpzOKz3kxm+rZqCvlatjkcGGeIo9H0CNKyGfZIRiv 6Oq8vGTKW7b284OrPZWAllDLTMSFExGnNERoOOVbKxJW1iIN9PQRdKOiS/0e71g5 mnEJutUexbz8LVp28mq2 =Gpjc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3625970.RkfLBurhZK-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 21:33:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B795B15 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:33:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5612D1D7 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:33:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-61-84.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.61.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86BD03CD36; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 22:33:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t0QLXB95002297; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 22:33:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 22:33:11 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Maxim Filimonov Subject: Re: Simple NAT Message-Id: <20150126223311.2e94d3cd.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <355611034.aCCaRRifNT@thinkpad> References: <3kWFlD70VnzRRrw@baobab.bilink.it> <20150126213658.48423c08.freebsd@edvax.de> <355611034.aCCaRRifNT@thinkpad> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Luciano Mannucci X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:33:22 -0000 On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:16:35 +0300, Maxim Filimonov wrote: > On Monday 26 January 2015 21:36:58 Polytropon wrote: > > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:45:16 +0100, Luciano Mannucci wrote: > > > I have a freebsd machine (FreeBSD troika 10.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE > > > #0 r274401) with openvpn that works like a charm :-)... > > > I wish to nat one and only one of my openvpn clients, possibly for a > > > single destination. What's the better way to avoid disturbing the rest > > > of the operations? > > > Any clues? > > > Is IPFW my friend? > > > > Yes, that should work. In /etc/rc.conf, set > > > > natd_enable="YES" > > natd_interface="xl0" > > > > Why use natd, when ipfw can do kernel NAT? You're right, that's probably easier. Because I didn't have a configuration example at hand, I took one from an older system still relying on natd. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 23:29:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6751BC6 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AB09160 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:29:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0QNTcVU014671 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:29:38 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t0QNTcnt014664; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:29:38 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:29:38 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Scott Bennett Subject: Re: buildworld, buildkernel, and devel/cache In-Reply-To: <201501261843.t0QIhX78006200@sdf.org> Message-ID: References: <201501261245.t0QCjUMD009768@sdf.org> <201501261843.t0QIhX78006200@sdf.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:29:38 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:29:41 -0000 On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Scott Bennett wrote: > On Mon., 27 January 2015, Warren Block wrote: >> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Scott Bennett wrote: >>> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:24:22 +0200 Ivan Klymenko wrote: >>>>> In /root/.profile I have >>>>> >>>>> CCACHE_DIR=/buildwork/ccache >>>>> export PATH=/usr/local/libexec/ccache:$PATH >>>>> export CCACHE_PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin >>>>> >>>>> In /root/.cshrc.extensions, a file I source from /root/.cshrc, I have >>>>> >>>>> setenv CCACHE_DIR /buildwork/ccache >>>>> setenv PATH /usr/local/libexec/ccache:$PATH >>>>> setenv CCACHE_PATH /usr/bin:/usr/local/bin >>>>> >>>> This file is in some ways you can >>>> help /usr/local/share/doc/ccache/ccache-howto-freebsd.txt >>> >>> I had read that and hadn't seen how that would work, but after seeing >>> your reply, I tried adding the three lines to /etc/make.conf and got errors, >>> like I had expected: >>> >>> make: "/etc/make.conf" line 18: Missing dependency operator >>> make: RE substitution error: repetition-operator operand invalid >>> make: Unclosed substitution for CXX (, missing) >>> make: "/etc/make.conf" line 20: Undefined variable "${CXX:C,^c++,/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/c++,1}" >>> make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue >>> make: stopped in /usr/src >>> >>> So my question remains. Please respond if you have something that >>> you have tried and know works. >>> Thanks in advance. >> >> They are shell variables, so set them in the shell, .cshrc or the two >> alternatives mentioned above. > > Well, the instructions in that file say, > > To use ccache for base add the following to /etc/make.conf. You > can replace cc and c++ with the compilers of your choice. (re- > member that only GCC and Clang can build world and kernel) > > && exists(/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc) > CC:=${CC:C,^cc,/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc,1} > CXX:=${CXX:C,^c++,/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/c++,1} > > which was why I had put those three lines into /etc/make.conf. On your > suggestion, I moved them to /root/.profile and /root/.cshrc.extensions, > with the results that in the csh case, I got (as expected) the > > Badly placed ()'s. > > error. sh gave no errors, so I started a buildworld, which has been running > for a little while already, but with no evidence to be found (e.g., no > counters increasing in "ccache -s" output, no ccache seen running in top, > the only instances of ccache in lastcomm(1) output are the ones I entered > manually to check the counters) that ccache is being used by buildworld at > all. I have not yet tried any ports updates to see whether addition of > those three lines to .profile had any adverse effect upon that process. > Thanks for the try, though. I might have missed something, so let's back up. Shell variables need to be set, and entries in make.conf need to be added. Both are needed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 26 23:54:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2478831E for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (smtp1.hushmail.com [65.39.178.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0680D657 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 85AD0401ED for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:54:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w3.hushmail.com [65.39.178.62]) by smtp1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:54:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id BD7B7C039E; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:54:09 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:54:09 +0000 To: "Herbert J. Skuhra" , parv@pair.com Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found From: opendaddy@hushmail.com In-Reply-To: <20150126202502.GA40007@oslo.ath.cx> References: <20150126132300.70653C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126141428.GA43445@holstein.holy.cow> <20150126145659.29F78C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126202502.GA40007@oslo.ath.cx> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150126235409.BD7B7C039E@smtp.hushmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, misc@opensmtpd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:54:12 -0000 Hello, On 26. januar 2015 at 8:18 PM, "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote: > >To understand why you get this error run: > >% whereis procmail | xargs -t ls -l Indeed, similar to the command parv gave me earlier: # whereis procmail | xargs -t -n1 ls -l ls -l procmail: ls: procmail:: No such file or directory ls -l /usr/local/bin/procmail -rwsr-sr-x 1 root mail 98224 Oct 3 04:19 /usr/local/bin/procmail ls -l /usr/local/man/man1/procmail.1.gz -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10793 Oct 3 04:19 /usr/local/man/man1/procmail.1 .gz >Do you have a .forward file in $HOME with the content "|procmail"? No, I do not. I just copied my smtpd.conf from OpenBSD where it was all working fine. I have no idea what's going on here. Why is procmail acting up? Thanks. O.D. > >-- >Herbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 00:05:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB2A34C2 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x233.google.com (mail-we0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72F457AF for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:05:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id q59so12015496wes.10 for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:05:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=CqXgulwuzhqT4+h96NCbUvmzDEOkh8BZ+J21+l66qOA=; b=B1k6y+MrU3ledJ8G7hyq/mZoMdt2ULgyTjwwKJ3yNqbRJtFL2r3AL1SzOhAzo8dzos zlGyC7KQRSqdpEEPNumO9ZdYOtNxZXb9cUHvn0w+Iwqh141HDjYPKSM6U1s2ZpOdSFvs KUCfMK57NVCkBaEOWRtCPSTIuSl0L9PWpxPCTAMoPKsk268q2TJRHC6CB92cuKvd72FE yNRaXFJmAF7PoZVHbQ7imMKqbSYs6PB2AWHpCbUWQUpJAwl5eR0SH4vUkJynh+nQqzjK 5hJzHV6OkCBuUVR+IYnx20B8eWzdjramgFfSx1+81bFUMSgTVOzJCWU2quxs0pfl/quZ 5Yhg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.126.99 with SMTP id mx3mr328759wib.66.1422317124660; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:05:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.241.132 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:05:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150126150030.563E7C0392@smtp.hushmail.com> References: <20150126135613.D9B7DD718AF@agent01.agent.vmail.yz.sinanode.com> <20150126150030.563E7C0392@smtp.hushmail.com> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:05:24 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFNQQU06IOiHquWKqOWbnuWkje+8mm9wZW5zbXRwZDogcHJvY21haWw6IG5vdCBmbw==?= =?UTF-8?B?dW5k?= From: Ben Woods To: "opendaddy@hushmail.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:05:27 -0000 Yes. On Tuesday, January 27, 2015, wrote: > On 26. januar 2015 at 1:49 PM, jzsf@vip.sina.com wrote: > > > >=E5=B7=B2=E6=94=B6=E5=88=B0=E6=82=A8=E7=9A=84=E6=9D=A5=E4=BF=A1=EF=BC=81 > > =E8=B0=A2=E8=B0=A2=EF=BC=81 > > =E8=8D=86=E5=B7=9E=E7=9B=9B=E5=8F=91 > > Anybody else getting bombarded with these every time they post to > questions? > > O.D. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org " --=20 -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 00:14:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1966F6F4 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.cyberleo.net (paka.cyberleo.net [216.226.128.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9EE18BA for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.44.4] (vitani.den.cyberleo.net [216.80.73.130]) by mail.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 051FC1650E; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:07:10 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <54C6D6AE.7040306@cyberleo.net> Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:07:10 -0600 From: CyberLeo Kitsana User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "C. P. Ghost" , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: [Semi-OT] SFF-8087 to eSata? References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:14:18 -0000 On 01/26/2015 12:25 PM, C. P. Ghost wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to connect an external enclosure for SATA drives > which comes with a single eSata connector for 8 drives in > JBOD mode on one side (it's an IcyBox IB-3680SU3) to an > HBA which comes with 2 external SFF-8087 connectors > for 4 drives each (that's an Avago SAS HBA 9207-8e, which > supports up to 1024 HDDs according to specs). That HBA has an SFF-8088 port (well, two), not SFF-8087. SFF-8088 is external, the 8087 variant is internal, and looks completely different. It looks like the enclosure funnels all disks through a single link, probably via something like a SATA port multiplier if you're lucky; but as the glossy pointedly leaves out support for anything but Windows 7/8 and OSX, it may well be a proprietary driver necessary to expose all eight bays. If my experience with similar setups is any indication, you're likely to want to toss this thing down the stairs in short order. > I'm trying to set up an external ZFS pool on those 8 drives. I did something similar, but chose to dedicate a link to each drive instead of faffing about with expanders or port multipliers. An LSI 9207-8e HBA, two Addonics AD4SMSAS bridges, a little creative dremeling, and a couple Amphenol SFF-8088 cables hooked up two enclosures nicely. > Now, I'm wondering what kind of cable or cable wizardry > I need to get both SFF-8087 with the single JBOD eSata > port connected. Is that possible at all? SFF-8087 and SFF-8088 both carry four SAS/SATA links; in theory, you would only need one, so something like this[1] would be most useful for you. The other seven lanes could be used for other things. [1] http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000JQ51CM -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Technical Administrator CyberLeo.Net Webhosting http://www.CyberLeo.Net Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 02:05:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32353126 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:05:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6977F7EF for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:05:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id t0R1xc3H091476 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:59:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <54C6F10A.203@bananmonarki.se> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:59:38 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SPAM: =?UTF-8?B?6Ieq5Yqo5Zue5aSN77yab3BlbnNtdHBkOiBwcm9jbWFp?= =?UTF-8?B?bDogbm90IGZvdW5k?= References: <20150126150030.563E7C0392@smtp.hushmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150126150030.563E7C0392@smtp.hushmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:05:57 -0000 On 2015-01-26 16:00, opendaddy@hushmail.com wrote: > On 26. januar 2015 at 1:49 PM, jzsf@vip.sina.com wrote: >> >> 已收到您的来信！ >> 谢谢！ >> 荆州盛发 > > Anybody else getting bombarded with these every time they post to questions? > No. Never seen it before you posted it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 02:57:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0926B9F1 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:57:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAD8DC5D for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:57:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0R2lIuD004929 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:47:18 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:47:18 -0600 From: dweimer To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Bacula 7.0.5 suddenly unable to resolve host names. Organization: dweimer.net Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Message-ID: <2317b3435a1568d3c1e5d49c5dd01286@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1-beta X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 02:57:37 -0000 I have a FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p4 system running Bacula 7.0.5 in a jail. That suddenly (backups ran just after midnight this morning without errors) can't resolve host names. I was unable to run my commands to switch out my external hard drive for a new weeks worth of backups. After some investigation I was only able to get the system back up and running by editing all of my Bacula configuration files and replacing the fully qualified domain host names with their IP Addresses. I can do nslookup (have bind-tools installed in jail) and get the IPs for every host name instantaneously, so no problem with DNS. I can alos use the host command followed by the host name, no issues there either. Anyone have any ideas what to check as to how the system resolves the host names to IPs that might be broken causing the Bacula programs to have issues? I tried reinstalling the Bacula ports, rebooting the jail, nothing seems to resolve it, debugging doesn't issue any notice about name resolution, at debug level 300 it just lists a timeout connecting. Though I haven't been able to find much on baculas debugging levels yet. I may do more testing tomorrow evening with higher levels to see if I can get an error that means something useful. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 05:59:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 366ADF11 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 05:59:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E148A143 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 05:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-69.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.69]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0R5xaof018526 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 23:59:37 -0600 Message-ID: <54C72ABF.8050504@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:05:51 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: qemu on FreeBSD 9.3R .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 05:59:39 -0000 .... I pkg-installed kqemu-kmod-1.3.0.p11_12 & qemu-0.11.1_18 for FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5 & followed instructions on http://virtuallyhyper.com/2013/02/running-vms-on-freebsd-using-qemu-with-vde/ down to the point of installing a VM. The example installs a RHEL guest, I wanted to try WinXP, so I did 'qemu -cdrom ../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -localtime' from the directory containing the HDD image 'HDD.img'. The screen (rxvt-2.6.4_6 running stock csh) immediately grunged up & left itself in a grunged up state :-/. Is there a way to re-initialize the rxvt state after such antics, to get it to forget whatever grunged state the (failed, I killed it after ~45 min.) qemu process left it in ? TIA .... P.S.: the qemu man page is also somewhat off/out of date, some of the options mentioned there don't work .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 06:02:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 279EDFC6 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 06:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CED601F8 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 06:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-69.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.69]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0R622jF019727 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:02:02 -0600 Message-ID: <54C72B51.8030101@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:08:17 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: qemu on FreeBSD 9.3R .... References: <54C72ABF.8050504@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <54C72ABF.8050504@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 06:02:04 -0000 On 01/27/15 00:05, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > > .... I pkg-installed kqemu-kmod-1.3.0.p11_12 & qemu-0.11.1_18 for > FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5 & followed instructions on > http://virtuallyhyper.com/2013/02/running-vms-on-freebsd-using-qemu-with-vde/ > down to the point of installing a VM. The example installs a RHEL > guest, I wanted to try WinXP, so I did 'qemu -cdrom > ../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -localtime' from the > directory containing the HDD image 'HDD.img'. The screen (rxvt-2.6.4_6 > running stock csh) immediately grunged up & left itself in a grunged > up state :-/. Is there a way to re-initialize the rxvt state after > such antics, to get it to forget whatever grunged state the (failed, I > killed it after ~45 min.) qemu process left it in ? TIA .... > > P.S.: the qemu man page is also somewhat off/out of date, some of the > options mentioned there don't work .... > > P.P.S: the grunged up state applies to the mouse only, keyboard & display of text, etc. works AOK, but click-&-drag to select text & other mouse based interactions don't work .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 08:32:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48E5F32B for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oslo.ath.cx (oslo.ath.cx [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:42e4::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "oslo.ath.cx", Issuer "oslo.ath.cx" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADFC7327 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:32:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oslo.ath.cx (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id c3556ec9; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:32:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:32:23 +0100 From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: opendaddy@hushmail.com Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found Message-ID: <20150127083223.GA46908@oslo.ath.cx> References: <20150126132300.70653C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126141428.GA43445@holstein.holy.cow> <20150126145659.29F78C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126202502.GA40007@oslo.ath.cx> <20150126235409.BD7B7C039E@smtp.hushmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150126235409.BD7B7C039E@smtp.hushmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, misc@opensmtpd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:32:28 -0000 On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:54:09PM +0000, opendaddy@hushmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > On 26. januar 2015 at 8:18 PM, "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote: > > > >To understand why you get this error run: > > > >% whereis procmail | xargs -t ls -l > > Indeed, similar to the command parv gave me earlier: > > # whereis procmail | xargs -t -n1 ls -l > ls -l procmail: > ls: procmail:: No such file or directory Got it? > ls -l /usr/local/bin/procmail > -rwsr-sr-x 1 root mail 98224 Oct 3 04:19 /usr/local/bin/procmail > ls -l /usr/local/man/man1/procmail.1.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 10793 Oct 3 04:19 /usr/local/man/man1/procmail.1 .gz > > >Do you have a .forward file in $HOME with the content "|procmail"? > > No, I do not. I just copied my smtpd.conf from OpenBSD where it was all working fine. > > I have no idea what's going on here. Why is procmail acting up? > > Thanks. I guess the error does not come from your smtpd.conf, otherwise the log would show: Jan 26 14:05:20 mybox smtpd[23304]: delivery: TempFail for cf077883a36bcae2: from=, to=, user=od, method=mda, delay=1h5m20s, stat=Error ("/usr/local/bin/procmail: not found") and not: Jan 26 14:05:20 mybox smtpd[23304]: delivery: TempFail for cf077883a36bcae2: from=, to=, user=od, method=mda, delay=1h5m20s, stat=Error ("procmail: not found") At least that's what's happening on my system (FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE). So obviously something else is calling 'procmail' and /usr/local/bin missing in $PATH! Maybe 'smtpd -dv' shows more information? -- Herbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 11:03:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5DD132B for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baobab.bilink.net (baobab.bilink.net [212.45.144.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FA5E6A5 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baobab.bilink.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3kWlRk0HMbzRRs0 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:03:30 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mcs.it Received: from baobab.bilink.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (baobab.mcs.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 11027) with ESMTP id 5dSDAxxY1ARC for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:03:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from hermes.mcs.it (hermes.mcs.it [192.168.132.21]) by baobab.bilink.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3kWlRj6h2RzRRrr for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:03:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from mordeus (unknown [192.168.44.6]) by hermes.mcs.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0C41B757D for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:03:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:03:30 +0100 From: Luciano Mannucci To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Simple NAT In-Reply-To: <355611034.aCCaRRifNT@thinkpad> References: <3kWFlD70VnzRRrw@baobab.bilink.it> <20150126213658.48423c08.freebsd@edvax.de> <355611034.aCCaRRifNT@thinkpad> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) X-Face: 4qPv4GNcD; h<7Q/sK>+GqF4=CR@KmnPkSmwd+#%\F`4yjKO3"C]p'z=(oWRnsYBQGM\5g:4skqQY0NnV'dM:Mm:^/_+I@a"; [-s=ogufdF"9ggQ'=y MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <3kWlRj6h2RzRRrr@baobab.bilink.it> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:03:31 -0000 On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:16:35 +0300 Maxim Filimonov wrote: > ipfw nat 1 config if log reset same_ports > ipfw add 00011 nat 1 ip from / to any out xmit > > ipfw add 00012 nat 1 ip from any to in recv > > And replace , , , with the > appropriate values. Ok I'll try this. I suppose I need to reboot... (it's a production server :-) Tanks, luciano. -- /"\ /Via A. Salaino, 7 - 20144 Milano (Italy) \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN / PHONE : +39 2 485781 FAX: +39 2 48578250 X AGAINST HTML MAIL / E-MAIL: posthamster@sublink.sublink.ORG / \ AND POSTINGS / WWW: http://www.lesassaie.IT/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 11:10:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D04E1481 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:10:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (smtp3.hushmail.com [65.39.178.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3A87771 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:10:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C3E3DE01E0 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:10:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.46]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:10:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 6FDC9E03D5; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:10:42 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:10:42 +0000 To: "Herbert J. Skuhra" Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found From: opendaddy@hushmail.com In-Reply-To: <20150127083223.GA46908@oslo.ath.cx> References: <20150126132300.70653C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126141428.GA43445@holstein.holy.cow> <20150126145659.29F78C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126202502.GA40007@oslo.ath.cx> <20150126235409.BD7B7C039E@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127083223.GA46908@oslo.ath.cx> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150127111042.6FDC9E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, misc@opensmtpd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:10:43 -0000 On 27. januar 2015 at 8:25 AM, "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote: > >On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:54:09PM +0000, opendaddy@hushmail.com > >I guess the error does not come from your smtpd.conf, otherwise >the log >would show: > >Jan 26 14:05:20 mybox smtpd[23304]: delivery: TempFail for >cf077883a36bcae2: from=, to=, user=od, >method=mda, delay=1h5m20s, stat=Error ("/usr/local/bin/procmail: >not found") > >and not: > >Jan 26 14:05:20 mybox smtpd[23304]: delivery: TempFail for >cf077883a36bcae2: from=, to=, user=od, >method=mda, delay=1h5m20s, stat=Error ("procmail: not found") > >At least that's what's happening on my system (FreeBSD 10.1- >STABLE). I see, I see. I'm on FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE. >So obviously something else is calling 'procmail' and >/usr/local/bin missing in $PATH! > >Maybe 'smtpd -dv' shows more information? # smtpd -dv fatal: control socket already listening Thanks! O.D. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 11:59:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BC7256E for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:59:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oslo.ath.cx (oslo.ath.cx [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:42e4::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "oslo.ath.cx", Issuer "oslo.ath.cx" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDEFCCD8 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oslo.ath.cx (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 3679eb25; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:59:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:59:35 +0100 From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: opendaddy@hushmail.com Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found Message-ID: <20150127115935.GA46981@oslo.ath.cx> References: <20150126132300.70653C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126141428.GA43445@holstein.holy.cow> <20150126145659.29F78C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126202502.GA40007@oslo.ath.cx> <20150126235409.BD7B7C039E@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127083223.GA46908@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127111042.6FDC9E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150127111042.6FDC9E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, misc@opensmtpd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:59:39 -0000 On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:10:42AM +0000, opendaddy@hushmail.com wrote: > On 27. januar 2015 at 8:25 AM, "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote: > > > >On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:54:09PM +0000, opendaddy@hushmail.com > > > >I guess the error does not come from your smtpd.conf, otherwise > >the log > >would show: > > > >Jan 26 14:05:20 mybox smtpd[23304]: delivery: TempFail for > >cf077883a36bcae2: from=, to=, user=od, > >method=mda, delay=1h5m20s, stat=Error ("/usr/local/bin/procmail: > >not found") > > > >and not: > > > >Jan 26 14:05:20 mybox smtpd[23304]: delivery: TempFail for > >cf077883a36bcae2: from=, to=, user=od, > >method=mda, delay=1h5m20s, stat=Error ("procmail: not found") > > > >At least that's what's happening on my system (FreeBSD 10.1- > >STABLE). > > I see, I see. I'm on FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE. > > >So obviously something else is calling 'procmail' and > >/usr/local/bin missing in $PATH! > > > >Maybe 'smtpd -dv' shows more information? > > # smtpd -dv > fatal: control socket already listening Well, you have to stop opensmtpd first. # service smtpd stop or # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/smtpd stop -- Herbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 12:25:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 591B8CEF for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:25:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.hushmail.com (smtp2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ABC81BF for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:25:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3B318A0288 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:48:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.46]) by smtp2.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:48:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id C35B7E03D5; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:48:30 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:48:30 +0000 To: "Edgar Pettijohn" , misc@opensmtpd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found From: opendaddy@hushmail.com In-Reply-To: <54C775FE.6020501@pettijohn-web.com> References: <20150126132300.70653C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126141428.GA43445@holstein.holy.cow> <20150126145659.29F78C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126202502.GA40007@oslo.ath.cx> <20150126235409.BD7B7C039E@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127083223.GA46908@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127111042.6FDC9E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <54C775FE.6020501@pettijohn-web.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150127114830.C35B7E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:25:55 -0000 Hello! On 27. januar 2015 at 11:21 AM, "Edgar Pettijohn" wrote: >>> >>> Maybe 'smtpd -dv' shows more information? >> # smtpd -dv >> fatal: control socket already listening >> >> Thanks! >> >> O.D. >> >> >Remember to "service smtpd stop" first, before this test. Ah yes! Now we got some action: # smtpd -dv debug: init ssl-tree info: OpenSMTPD 5.4.2p1 starting debug: bounce warning after 4h debug: using "fs" queue backend debug: using "ramqueue" scheduler backend debug: using "ram" stat backend info: startup [debug mode] mfa: building simple chains... debug: queue: done loading queue into scheduler mfa: building complex chains... mfa: done building complex chains mfa: done building default chain libevent 2.0.22-stable (kqueue) debug: parent_send_config_ruleset: reloading debug: parent_send_config_mfa: reloading debug: parent_send_config: configuring smtp debug: mfa ready debug: smtp: listen on 127.0.0.1 port 25 flags 0x0 pki "" debug: smtp: will accept at most 29120 clients debug: smtpd: scanning offline queue... debug: smtpd: offline scanning done debug: scheduler: evp:b757c52fd160fb0d scheduled (mda) mda: new user f72ba568b9efd05b for ":root" debug: lka: userinfo :root debug: mda: new session f72ba569c103cbc9 for user ":root" evpid b7 57c52fd160fb0d debug: mda: no more envelope for ":root" debug: mda: got message fd 4 for session f72ba569c103cbc9 evpid b757c52fd160 fb0d debug: mda: querying mda fd for session f72ba569c103cbc9 evpid b757c52fd160f b0d debug: smtpd: forking mda for session f72ba569c103cbc9: "/usr/local/bin/proc mail -f -" as root delivery: TempFail for b757c52fd160fb0d: from=<>, to=, user=root , method=mda, delay=4h50m5s, stat=Error (not allowed to deliver to: root) debug: mda: session f72ba569c103cbc9 done debug: mda: user "root" becomes runnable debug: mda: all done for user ":root" debug: scheduler: evp:3ea50754ebc57df8 scheduled (mda) mda: new user f72ba56a06a86a79 for ":root" debug: lka: userinfo :root debug: mda: new session f72ba56b009d2ba4 for user ":root" evpid 3e a50754ebc57df8 debug: mda: no more envelope for ":root" debug: mda: got message fd 4 for session f72ba56b009d2ba4 evpid 3ea50754ebc5 7df8 debug: mda: querying mda fd for session f72ba56b009d2ba4 evpid 3ea50754ebc57 df8 debug: smtpd: forking mda for session f72ba56b009d2ba4: "/usr/local/bin/proc mail -f -" as root delivery: TempFail for 3ea50754ebc57df8: from=<>, to=, user=root , method=mda, delay=4h50m5s, stat=Error (not allowed to deliver to: root) debug: mda: session f72ba56b009d2ba4 done debug: mda: user "root" becomes runnable debug: mda: all done for user ":root" Thank you! O.D. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 12:40:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 703BC1CB for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:40:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "SDF.ORG" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53F8036B for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:40:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:bennett@otaku.freeshell.org [192.94.73.9]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0RCe9Wr015805 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:40:09 GMT Received: (from bennett@localhost) by sdf.org (8.14.8/8.12.8/Submit) id t0RCe9GA006605; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 06:40:09 -0600 (CST) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <201501271240.t0RCe9GA006605@sdf.org> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 06:40:09 -0600 To: wblock@wonkity.com Subject: Re: buildworld, buildkernel, and devel/cache References: <201501261245.t0QCjUMD009768@sdf.org> <201501261843.t0QIhX78006200@sdf.org> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 6/20/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:40:23 -0000 Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Scott Bennett wrote: > > > On Mon., 27 January 2015, Warren Block wrote: > >> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Scott Bennett wrote: > >>> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 10:24:22 +0200 Ivan Klymenko wrote: > >>>>> In /root/.profile I have > >>>>> > >>>>> CCACHE_DIR=/buildwork/ccache It occurs to me that the above line might not propagate its value down into subshells (e.g., sh(1) run by buildworld, buildkernel, etc.), so I have just now replaced it with export CCACHE_DIR=/buildwork/ccache so that, if I ever get buildworld or buildkernel to run ccache, it should find the correct cache location. > >>>>> export PATH=/usr/local/libexec/ccache:$PATH > >>>>> export CCACHE_PATH=/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin > >>>>> > >>>>> In /root/.cshrc.extensions, a file I source from /root/.cshrc, I have > >>>>> > >>>>> setenv CCACHE_DIR /buildwork/ccache > >>>>> setenv PATH /usr/local/libexec/ccache:$PATH > >>>>> setenv CCACHE_PATH /usr/bin:/usr/local/bin > >>>>> > >>>> This file is in some ways you can > >>>> help /usr/local/share/doc/ccache/ccache-howto-freebsd.txt > >>> > >>> I had read that and hadn't seen how that would work, but after seeing > >>> your reply, I tried adding the three lines to /etc/make.conf and got errors, > >>> like I had expected: > >>> > >>> make: "/etc/make.conf" line 18: Missing dependency operator > >>> make: RE substitution error: repetition-operator operand invalid > >>> make: Unclosed substitution for CXX (, missing) > >>> make: "/etc/make.conf" line 20: Undefined variable "${CXX:C,^c++,/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/c++,1}" > >>> make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue > >>> make: stopped in /usr/src > >>> > >>> So my question remains. Please respond if you have something that > >>> you have tried and know works. > >>> Thanks in advance. > >> > >> They are shell variables, so set them in the shell, .cshrc or the two > >> alternatives mentioned above. > > > > Well, the instructions in that file say, > > > > To use ccache for base add the following to /etc/make.conf. You > > can replace cc and c++ with the compilers of your choice. (re- > > member that only GCC and Clang can build world and kernel) > > > > && exists(/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc) > > CC:=${CC:C,^cc,/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc,1} > > CXX:=${CXX:C,^c++,/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/c++,1} > > > > which was why I had put those three lines into /etc/make.conf. On your > > suggestion, I moved them to /root/.profile and /root/.cshrc.extensions, > > with the results that in the csh case, I got (as expected) the > > > > Badly placed ()'s. > > > > error. sh gave no errors, so I started a buildworld, which has been running > > for a little while already, but with no evidence to be found (e.g., no > > counters increasing in "ccache -s" output, no ccache seen running in top, > > the only instances of ccache in lastcomm(1) output are the ones I entered > > manually to check the counters) that ccache is being used by buildworld at > > all. I have not yet tried any ports updates to see whether addition of > > those three lines to .profile had any adverse effect upon that process. > > Thanks for the try, though. > > I might have missed something, so let's back up. Shell variables need > to be set, and entries in make.conf need to be added. Both are needed. Yes. I guess I'm missing your point. I followed the instructions in /usr/local/share/doc/ccache/ccache-howto-freebsd.txt, which turned out to cause errors on the three lines in question from those instructions. I then followed your suggestion to move them, and that was ineffective in .profile and caused errors in .cshrc.extensions. So I don't see how those particular shell variables are to be set. The only other entry for /etc/make.conf is the entry that, by itself, is sufficient to build ports using ccache, and that, as I noted originally, was working just fine. With CCACHE_DIR set in .profile and set as an environment variable in .cshrc.extensions, ports even get built okay with ccache cacheing its data in the correct file system. (Yay!) But if there are other /etc/make.conf entries needed (but undocumented?) or other shell/environment variables needed (also undocumented?) to get buildworld and buildkernel to use ccache, the please clarify. And thanks, Walter, for your attention to this. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at sdf.org *xor* bennett at freeshell.org * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 12:56:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EBC34A2 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:56:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oslo.ath.cx (oslo.ath.cx [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:42e4::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "oslo.ath.cx", Issuer "oslo.ath.cx" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0038F7B6 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oslo.ath.cx (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 42f2618a; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:56:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:56:49 +0100 From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: opendaddy@hushmail.com Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found Message-ID: <20150127125649.GA51008@oslo.ath.cx> References: <20150126132300.70653C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126141428.GA43445@holstein.holy.cow> <20150126145659.29F78C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126202502.GA40007@oslo.ath.cx> <20150126235409.BD7B7C039E@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127083223.GA46908@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127111042.6FDC9E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <54C775FE.6020501@pettijohn-web.com> <20150127114830.C35B7E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150127114830.C35B7E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, misc@opensmtpd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:56:52 -0000 On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:48:30AM +0000, opendaddy@hushmail.com wrote: > Hello! > > On 27. januar 2015 at 11:21 AM, "Edgar Pettijohn" wrote: > >>> > >>> Maybe 'smtpd -dv' shows more information? > >> # smtpd -dv > >> fatal: control socket already listening > >> > >> Thanks! > >> > >> O.D. > >> > >> > >Remember to "service smtpd stop" first, before this test. > > Ah yes! Now we got some action: > > # smtpd -dv > debug: init ssl-tree > info: OpenSMTPD 5.4.2p1 starting > debug: bounce warning after 4h > debug: using "fs" queue backend > debug: using "ramqueue" scheduler backend > debug: using "ram" stat backend > info: startup [debug mode] > mfa: building simple chains... > debug: queue: done loading queue into scheduler > mfa: building complex chains... > mfa: done building complex chains > mfa: done building default chain > libevent 2.0.22-stable (kqueue) > debug: parent_send_config_ruleset: reloading > debug: parent_send_config_mfa: reloading > debug: parent_send_config: configuring smtp > debug: mfa ready > debug: smtp: listen on 127.0.0.1 port 25 flags 0x0 pki "" > debug: smtp: will accept at most 29120 clients > debug: smtpd: scanning offline queue... > debug: smtpd: offline scanning done > debug: scheduler: evp:b757c52fd160fb0d scheduled (mda) > mda: new user f72ba568b9efd05b for ":root" > debug: lka: userinfo :root > debug: mda: new session f72ba569c103cbc9 for user ":root" evpid b7 57c52fd160fb0d > debug: mda: no more envelope for ":root" > debug: mda: got message fd 4 for session f72ba569c103cbc9 evpid b757c52fd160 fb0d > debug: mda: querying mda fd for session f72ba569c103cbc9 evpid b757c52fd160f b0d > debug: smtpd: forking mda for session f72ba569c103cbc9: "/usr/local/bin/proc mail -f -" as root > delivery: TempFail for b757c52fd160fb0d: from=<>, to=, user=root , method=mda, delay=4h50m5s, stat=Error (not allowed to deliver to: root) > debug: mda: session f72ba569c103cbc9 done > debug: mda: user "root" becomes runnable > debug: mda: all done for user ":root" > debug: scheduler: evp:3ea50754ebc57df8 scheduled (mda) > mda: new user f72ba56a06a86a79 for ":root" > debug: lka: userinfo :root > debug: mda: new session f72ba56b009d2ba4 for user ":root" evpid 3e a50754ebc57df8 > debug: mda: no more envelope for ":root" > debug: mda: got message fd 4 for session f72ba56b009d2ba4 evpid 3ea50754ebc5 7df8 > debug: mda: querying mda fd for session f72ba56b009d2ba4 evpid 3ea50754ebc57 df8 > debug: smtpd: forking mda for session f72ba56b009d2ba4: "/usr/local/bin/proc mail -f -" as root > delivery: TempFail for 3ea50754ebc57df8: from=<>, to=, user=root , method=mda, delay=4h50m5s, stat=Error (not allowed to deliver to: root) > debug: mda: session f72ba56b009d2ba4 done > debug: mda: user "root" becomes runnable > debug: mda: all done for user ":root" 1. Create an alias for root and run newaliases. 2. Show debug output for the error "procmail: not found" -- Herbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 13:31:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 57EBAD52 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oslo.ath.cx (oslo.ath.cx [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:42e4::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "oslo.ath.cx", Issuer "oslo.ath.cx" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B90CDBCC for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:31:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oslo.ath.cx (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1c981521; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:31:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:31:52 +0100 From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: opendaddy@hushmail.com Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found Message-ID: <20150127133152.GB51008@oslo.ath.cx> References: <20150126141428.GA43445@holstein.holy.cow> <20150126145659.29F78C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126202502.GA40007@oslo.ath.cx> <20150126235409.BD7B7C039E@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127083223.GA46908@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127111042.6FDC9E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <54C775FE.6020501@pettijohn-web.com> <20150127114830.C35B7E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127125649.GA51008@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127130249.6B345E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150127130249.6B345E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, misc@opensmtpd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:31:55 -0000 On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:02:49PM +0000, opendaddy@hushmail.com wrote: > On 27. januar 2015 at 12:49 PM, "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote: > > > >1. Create an alias for root and run newaliases. > > I already have this (I've also run newaliases): > > # cat /etc/mail/aliases Try /usr/local/etc/mail/aliases instead. > >2. Show debug output for the error "procmail: not found" > > How do I debug that error? Do you mean with `smtpd -dv`? Yes. Fix the alias problem or send e-mail to a different user. -- Herbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 13:35:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 397C8E3A for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:35:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (smtp10.hushmail.com [65.39.178.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1419C09 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A2EBC0222 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.46]) by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 6B345E03D5; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:02:49 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:02:49 +0000 To: "Herbert J. Skuhra" Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found From: opendaddy@hushmail.com In-Reply-To: <20150127125649.GA51008@oslo.ath.cx> References: <20150126132300.70653C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126141428.GA43445@holstein.holy.cow> <20150126145659.29F78C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126202502.GA40007@oslo.ath.cx> <20150126235409.BD7B7C039E@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127083223.GA46908@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127111042.6FDC9E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <54C775FE.6020501@pettijohn-web.com> <20150127114830.C35B7E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127125649.GA51008@oslo.ath.cx> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150127130249.6B345E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, misc@opensmtpd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:35:56 -0000 On 27. januar 2015 at 12:49 PM, "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote: > >1. Create an alias for root and run newaliases. I already have this (I've also run newaliases): # cat /etc/mail/aliases root: opendaddy # Basic system aliases -- these MUST be present MAILER-DAEMON: postmaster postmaster: root # General redirections for pseudo accounts _dhcp: root _pflogd: root auditdistd: root >2. Show debug output for the error "procmail: not found" How do I debug that error? Do you mean with `smtpd -dv`? O.D. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 13:44:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB063180 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mxout01.bytecamp.net (mxout01.bytecamp.net [212.204.60.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F863D19 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:44:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mxout01.bytecamp.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5090E315841; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:39:00 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=bytecamp.net; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20140709; bh=MN0LeBMjGRylebV1KVqOC8IEN/o=; b=4X18zECKDFWtyUic0ixQ1OF9/38S2OQcNpLGdEEnHNfs6/V6KvQTv9UvqCCsPwJZ6YrP7Xhql9Lj0lfl4Njfu09Vxo18+UD/jJv0EP8YKabava7zQnlt/ljHFUYdR+zOSHoUYzays69U1y9nnydetcTILl5PY/tuRJ4THP1PIuc= Received: from mail.bytecamp.net (mailstore.bytecamp.net [212.204.60.20]) by mxout01.bytecamp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC40F31581A for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:38:59 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 40216 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jan 2015 14:35:10 +0100 Received: from housing58.bytecamp.net (HELO ?212.204.60.58?) (rs%bytecamp.net@212.204.60.58) by mail.bytecamp.net with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Jan 2015 14:35:10 +0100 Message-ID: <54C7940E.3000509@bytecamp.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:35:10 +0100 From: Robert Schulze Organization: bytecamp GmbH User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: opendaddy@hushmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found References: <20150126132300.70653C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126141428.GA43445@holstein.holy.cow> <20150126145659.29F78C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126202502.GA40007@oslo.ath.cx> <20150126235409.BD7B7C039E@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127083223.GA46908@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127111042.6FDC9E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <54C775FE.6020501@pettijohn-web.com> <20150127114830.C35B7E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150127114830.C35B7E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:44:51 -0000 Hi, Am 27.01.2015 um 12:48 schrieb opendaddy@hushmail.com: > # smtpd -dv > [...] > debug: smtpd: forking mda for session f72ba569c103cbc9: "/usr/local/bin/proc mail -f -" as root just to clarify: is the blank between "proc" and "mail" intentional? Maybe you just have misconfigured this tiny bit. with kind regards, Robert Schulze From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 14:58:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D900DECC for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:58:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (smtp10.hushmail.com [65.39.178.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8B5A7C5 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:58:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CC606C021D for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:58:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.46]) by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:58:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 9410CE03D5; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:58:33 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:58:33 +0000 To: "Herbert J. Skuhra" Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found [SOLVED] From: opendaddy@hushmail.com In-Reply-To: <20150127133152.GB51008@oslo.ath.cx> References: <20150126141428.GA43445@holstein.holy.cow> <20150126145659.29F78C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126202502.GA40007@oslo.ath.cx> <20150126235409.BD7B7C039E@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127083223.GA46908@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127111042.6FDC9E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <54C775FE.6020501@pettijohn-web.com> <20150127114830.C35B7E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127125649.GA51008@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127130249.6B345E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127133152.GB51008@oslo.ath.cx> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150127145833.9410CE03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> Cc: Robert Schulze , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, misc@opensmtpd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:58:36 -0000 On 27. januar 2015 at 1:24 PM, "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote: > >Try /usr/local/etc/mail/aliases instead. > Oh man -- that was it! Now getting `delivery: Ok`. Thank you so much. You and everyone else who chipped in. Time to send some emails. All the best, O.D. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 14:58:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F1C1ECD for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (smtp3.hushmail.com [65.39.178.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40E7D7C6 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:58:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 26399E01EC for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:58:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.46]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:58:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id E354AE03D5; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:58:35 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:58:35 +0000 To: "Robert Schulze" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found From: opendaddy@hushmail.com In-Reply-To: <54C7940E.3000509@bytecamp.net> References: <20150126132300.70653C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126141428.GA43445@holstein.holy.cow> <20150126145659.29F78C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126202502.GA40007@oslo.ath.cx> <20150126235409.BD7B7C039E@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127083223.GA46908@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127111042.6FDC9E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <54C775FE.6020501@pettijohn-web.com> <20150127114830.C35B7E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <54C7940E.3000509@bytecamp.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150127145835.E354AE03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:58:37 -0000 On 27. januar 2015 at 1:32 PM, "Robert Schulze" wrote: > >just to clarify: is the blank between "proc" and "mail" >intentional? >Maybe you just have misconfigured this tiny bit. > My bad, that sometimes happens when I copy/paste from PuTTY :-) Thanks for the observation though! All the best, O.D. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 15:08:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D56DA143 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:08:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (smtp10.hushmail.com [65.39.178.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3EFA8E0 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A189C017B for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.46]) by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:08:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id BC37DE03D5; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:08:40 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:08:40 +0000 To: "Herbert J. Skuhra" Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found [FALSE ALERT - STILL UNRESOLVED] From: opendaddy@hushmail.com In-Reply-To: <20150127145833.9410CE03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> References: <20150126141428.GA43445@holstein.holy.cow> <20150126145659.29F78C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126202502.GA40007@oslo.ath.cx> <20150126235409.BD7B7C039E@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127083223.GA46908@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127111042.6FDC9E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <54C775FE.6020501@pettijohn-web.com> <20150127114830.C35B7E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127125649.GA51008@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127130249.6B345E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127133152.GB51008@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127145833.9410CE03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150127150840.BC37DE03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> Cc: Robert Schulze , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, misc@opensmtpd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:08:42 -0000 I apologize for the inconvenience, but the `procmail: not found` errors are still there. As for aliases, it seems FreeBSD supports both /etc/mail/aliases and /usr/local/etc/mail/aliases. O.D. On 27. januar 2015 at 2:51 PM, opendaddy@hushmail.com wrote: > >On 27. januar 2015 at 1:24 PM, "Herbert J. Skuhra" > wrote: >> >>Try /usr/local/etc/mail/aliases instead. >> > >Oh man -- that was it! Now getting `delivery: Ok`. > >Thank you so much. You and everyone else who chipped in. Time to >send some emails. > >All the best, >O.D. > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 15:25:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26DEB325 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:25:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mxout01.bytecamp.net (mxout01.bytecamp.net [212.204.60.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB84DAAB for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:25:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mxout01.bytecamp.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E59BE30FE01; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:25:38 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=bytecamp.net; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=20140709; bh=Snp3+aeAXT1duwhCilhhPHardCk=; b=VlPhAxQ2bt8q4bN4+2M8D1H4NsAiCWRqOxsdyIFYqUkHqNeIU5sJvNuwjkd7OQXtaXWMlYOmkPjO/X2oo8tWM72GWjaRFif/UXplz1Y94KELeQzTVx5Cr6P0f5wvO7LIpQ+IJJObzQMcM4cdSdmH5suxZFPlISQMufV7F8YJJ10= Received: from mail.bytecamp.net (mailstore.bytecamp.net [212.204.60.20]) by mxout01.bytecamp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9488230FDB2 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:25:38 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 99516 invoked by uid 89); 27 Jan 2015 16:25:38 +0100 Received: from housing58.bytecamp.net (HELO ?212.204.60.58?) (rs%bytecamp.net@212.204.60.58) by mail.bytecamp.net with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 27 Jan 2015 16:25:38 +0100 Message-ID: <54C7ADF2.3060604@bytecamp.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:25:38 +0100 From: Robert Schulze Organization: bytecamp GmbH User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: opendaddy@hushmail.com Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found [FALSE ALERT - STILL UNRESOLVED] References: <20150126141428.GA43445@holstein.holy.cow> <20150126145659.29F78C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126202502.GA40007@oslo.ath.cx> <20150126235409.BD7B7C039E@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127083223.GA46908@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127111042.6FDC9E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <54C775FE.6020501@pettijohn-web.com> <20150127114830.C35B7E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127125649.GA51008@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127130249.6B345E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127133152.GB51008@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127145833.9410CE03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127150840.BC37DE03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150127150840.BC37DE03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:25:42 -0000 Hi, Am 27.01.2015 um 16:08 schrieb opendaddy@hushmail.com: > I apologize for the inconvenience, but the `procmail: not found` errors are still there. > well, it must be called from somewhere. Maybe 'grep -r procmail /usr/local/etc/mail/' shows another location in the config files. with kind regards, Robert Schulze From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 15:32:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC873585 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E73AB86 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0RFWFSD050060 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:32:15 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t0RFWFv7050057; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:32:15 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:32:15 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Scott Bennett Subject: Re: buildworld, buildkernel, and devel/cache In-Reply-To: <201501271240.t0RCe9GA006605@sdf.org> Message-ID: References: <201501261245.t0QCjUMD009768@sdf.org> <201501261843.t0QIhX78006200@sdf.org> <201501271240.t0RCe9GA006605@sdf.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:32:15 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:32:18 -0000 On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Scott Bennett wrote: >> I might have missed something, so let's back up. Shell variables need >> to be set, and entries in make.conf need to be added. Both are needed. > > Yes. I guess I'm missing your point. I followed the instructions in > /usr/local/share/doc/ccache/ccache-howto-freebsd.txt, which turned out to > cause errors on the three lines in question from those instructions. I then > followed your suggestion to move them, and that was ineffective in .profile > and caused errors in .cshrc.extensions. So I don't see how those particular > shell variables are to be set. > The only other entry for /etc/make.conf is the entry that, by itself, > is sufficient to build ports using ccache, and that, as I noted originally, > was working just fine. With CCACHE_DIR set in .profile and set as an > environment variable in .cshrc.extensions, ports even get built okay with > ccache cacheing its data in the correct file system. (Yay!) > But if there are other /etc/make.conf entries needed (but undocumented?) > or other shell/environment variables needed (also undocumented?) to get > buildworld and buildkernel to use ccache, the please clarify. I just reinstalled devel/ccache to test this. The options to create links to clang and llvm were turned on in the port. My old settings in /root/.cshrc were uncommented: setenv PATH /usr/local/libexec/ccache:$PATH setenv CCACHE_PATH /usr/bin:/usr/local/bin setenv CCACHE_DIR /usr/.ccache setenv CCACHE_COMPRESS yes The last two are additions. (I found that compression helped fit more files in the same space without measurably slowing down the build.) In /etc/make.conf, I added this: .if (!empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/src*) || !empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/obj*)) .if !defined(NOCCACHE) && exists(/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc) CC:=${CC:C,^cc,/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc,1} CXX:=${CXX:C,^c\+\+,/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/c++,1} .endif .endif This is on 10.1-STABLE. make(1) changed a while back, so very old versions of FreeBSD might have errors with those. I logged back in as root and started a buildworld, and see this: /usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc -m32 ... > And thanks, Walter, for your attention to this. You're welcome, Steve. :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 16:05:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 716B7966 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:05:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oslo.ath.cx (oslo.ath.cx [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:42e4::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "oslo.ath.cx", Issuer "oslo.ath.cx" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE9BAEA6 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:05:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oslo.ath.cx (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 2d8cfec1; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:05:36 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:05:36 +0100 From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: opendaddy@hushmail.com Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found [FALSE ALERT - STILL UNRESOLVED] Message-ID: <20150127160536.GC51008@oslo.ath.cx> References: <20150126235409.BD7B7C039E@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127083223.GA46908@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127111042.6FDC9E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <54C775FE.6020501@pettijohn-web.com> <20150127114830.C35B7E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127125649.GA51008@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127130249.6B345E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127133152.GB51008@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127145833.9410CE03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127150840.BC37DE03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150127150840.BC37DE03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, misc@opensmtpd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:05:41 -0000 Please show output of 'smtpd -dv' and (user's) procmailrc. On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 03:08:40PM +0000, opendaddy@hushmail.com wrote: > I apologize for the inconvenience, but the `procmail: not found` errors are still there. > > As for aliases, it seems FreeBSD supports both /etc/mail/aliases and /usr/local/etc/mail/aliases. > > O.D. > > On 27. januar 2015 at 2:51 PM, opendaddy@hushmail.com wrote: > > > >On 27. januar 2015 at 1:24 PM, "Herbert J. Skuhra" > > wrote: > >> > >>Try /usr/local/etc/mail/aliases instead. > >> > > > >Oh man -- that was it! Now getting `delivery: Ok`. > > > >Thank you so much. You and everyone else who chipped in. Time to > >send some emails. > > > >All the best, > >O.D. > > > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > >unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > -- > You received this mail because you are subscribed to misc@opensmtpd.org > To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscribe@opensmtpd.org > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 17:02:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B09FF24E for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D2417C6 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-54.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.54]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0RH2hic018754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:02:44 -0600 Message-ID: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:08:58 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:02:51 -0000 .... FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5, qemu-0.11.1_18, kqemu-kmod-1.3.0.p11_12 ? I have tried w/ kqemu loaded & unloaded (recommended online), w/ -nographic, w/ -vga std, etc. No love. All I want to do is run a WinXP 32bit VM &/or a 64-bit Win7 VM from my desktop (xfce-4.10_7, xorg-7.7_1, xf86-video-vesa-2.3.3_5) :-/ .... Several online sites imply that it works OK, 1 specifically w/ FreeBSD 9 no less. Any clues appreciated, any more info gladly provided .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 21:05:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 025FC830 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 21:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net (lb3-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net [194.109.24.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BCF5AA3 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 21:05:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.home ([83.162.243.5]) by smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net with ESMTP id l94P1p00707iGuj0194Q0h; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:04:24 +0100 Received: by slackbox.erewhon.home (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0F04A12426; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:04:23 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:04:22 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... Message-ID: <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> Mail-Followup-To: "William A. Mahaffey III" , FreeBSD Questions !!!! References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 21:05:37 -0000 --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:08:58AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >=20 >=20 > .... FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5, qemu-0.11.1_18, kqemu-kmod-1.3.0.p11_12 ? I= =20 > have tried w/ kqemu loaded & unloaded (recommended online), w/=20 > -nographic, w/ -vga std, etc. No love. All I want to do is run a WinXP=20 > 32bit VM &/or a 64-bit Win7 VM from my desktop (xfce-4.10_7, xorg-7.7_1,= =20 > xf86-video-vesa-2.3.3_5) :-/ .... Several online sites imply that it=20 > works OK, 1 specifically w/ FreeBSD 9 no less. Any clues appreciated,=20 > any more info gladly provided .... This version is *ancient*. I would suggest trying qemu-devel instead, becau= se that provides qemu-2.2.0. Last time I tried it 0.11 with or without qkemu crashed a lot. According to the website, qemu version 0.11 and up do not support kqemu anymore (see http://wiki.qemu.org/KQEMU), so you don't need that anymore. In time (and if your processor is new enough to have =E2=80=9Cextended page= tables=E2=80=9D) I guess qemu on FreeBSD could be replaced by the bhyve hypervisor that is now= in 10.x and is being developed further in HEAD. Currently bhyve can load FreeB= SD, OpenBSD, NetBSD and Linux guests. Support to run windoze as a guest will co= me in the future. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 5753 3324 1661 B0FE 8D93 FCED 40F6 D5DC A38A 33E0 (keyID: A38A33E0) --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJUx/1WAAoJEED21dyjijPgeRQQALaIGRxjGwWRREsPnX8hNXBO UAi9qdkaCQ/Gprkik+00o5vmTVjqGHlJX6JerfC6GlFnILq1s2jJ2W0mGUVLjX/L T8zW5UPkKzoE34Hsz/azBzh70rvGQsc23D2k5IT1tF40N0ZJoZyNY1flNRM1FyHf HPeBCH78QIbHXyp5vK33qtd0TiyDA1oLZ62YSCnyqr01y1yJLM1oRQDEwFeANb3C pm3LfVbBeBZZPJ7u75aXojGRVX3UY3rSTzy5uEwsTdp/Q4fDKWbdU4qe+5QA0fwa tl/hQ3Ba/olHoc75PdaTOw7FAidykAwnBDsd/ubNiJRdkJRUInspp7Z/+/v9ppxf yxQGdTfBRR+wW+JSH4U0oErTIjWe2V+KRVVimfgyBLfi4tI1gtWofS3J/rtlBiYW BalSMzFh0IhGV3zRddcazI+/7bVH/zkuTp2gADBbk8jYYVNWJ6lZ0rLWVcBYC32w eOfymh92Wl/jwIiVc0LbxiGJGwm8TrYIU5IKEef10XFRdlVI4ukxrgG2FE5ab+5h 4rmMIQDnh/582BS959ZKmJSMH3Ag+UwevLAOMd1XSX+HazYwRx5UFiYFs/b7wmKk OqSEXTKUT3kE721eQUV6B9h5HL6lmzZ6Y1TUXJBUknjPeMNIdQI7q6PFrTdLsp4T GtoJUdQP4J0oVXVi2lUk =g+uX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 21:33:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D70A3D6 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 21:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a0i241.smtpcorp.com (a0i241.smtpcorp.com [216.22.15.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0573FDEA for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 21:33:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smtpcorp.com; s=a0_1; h=Feedback-ID:X-Smtpcorp-Track:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From; bh=MXpVtTD8LYVZaSt0UiWAz9MgCK9VVRj9mFOsHJ29cmY=; b=Jux1Zs8zMQ2jF94gQfaW4J7gsImI1sgOWIzurWUFQK7uywS61jY4fTR0J6JHbW6eTqLlAlEDbyEi9sHmC2H5CQSufSMvIGY2Gx8Uc0Qxvz7Z1bSW4bmyWrqcBWAEEPRfzwVzP5OUBaX1H6CpuofbuuO2lSe0wMvy2Icu1wku500=; From: Daniel Corbe To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:31:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> (Roland Smith's message of "Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:04:22 +0100") Message-ID: <87iofrsyft.fsf@corbe.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Smtpcorp-Track: 1YGDMmNRKHPhFU.yjOtluliv Feedback-ID: 10661m:10661aegzayD:10661sjY01NsBdY:SMTPCORP Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 21:33:50 -0000 Roland Smith writes: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:08:58AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >> .... FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5, qemu-0.11.1_18, kqemu-kmod-1.3.0.p11_12 ? I= =20 >> have tried w/ kqemu loaded & unloaded (recommended online), w/=20 >> -nographic, w/ -vga std, etc. No love. All I want to do is run a WinXP=20 >> 32bit VM &/or a 64-bit Win7 VM from my desktop (xfce-4.10_7, xorg-7.7_1,= =20 >> xf86-video-vesa-2.3.3_5) :-/ .... Several online sites imply that it=20 >> works OK, 1 specifically w/ FreeBSD 9 no less. Any clues appreciated,=20 >> any more info gladly provided .... > > This version is *ancient*. I would suggest trying qemu-devel instead, bec= ause > that provides qemu-2.2.0. Last time I tried it 0.11 with or without qkemu > crashed a lot. > > According to the website, qemu version 0.11 and up do not support kqemu > anymore (see http://wiki.qemu.org/KQEMU), so you don't need that > anymore. This brings up an interesting question. Is kqemu-kmod and kqemu's idead of "kqemu" the same thing? If so, good luck to anyone trying to virtualize production loads with qemu on FreeBSD. Are there alternatives? KVM's documentation on the subject seems dated: http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/BSD But I'm not entirely convinces kqemu-kmod =3D=3D kqemu if KVM is even bothering to mention it. > > In time (and if your processor is new enough to have =E2=80=9Cextended pa= ge tables=E2=80=9D) I > guess qemu on FreeBSD could be replaced by the bhyve hypervisor that is n= ow in > 10.x and is being developed further in HEAD. Currently bhyve can load Fre= eBSD, > OpenBSD, NetBSD and Linux guests. Support to run windoze as a guest will = come > in the future. > I'm patiently waiting for bhyve to get VGA BIOS support so I can run Windows guests. In a perfect world maybe. -Daniel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 21:54:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5056B902 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 21:54:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A2A2FFA for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 21:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-61.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.61]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0RLsJD3026665 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:54:20 -0600 Message-ID: <54C80A82.2000405@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 16:00:34 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> In-Reply-To: <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 21:54:22 -0000 On 01/27/15 15:04, Roland Smith wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:08:58AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> >> .... FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5, qemu-0.11.1_18, kqemu-kmod-1.3.0.p11_12 ? I >> have tried w/ kqemu loaded & unloaded (recommended online), w/ >> -nographic, w/ -vga std, etc. No love. All I want to do is run a WinXP >> 32bit VM &/or a 64-bit Win7 VM from my desktop (xfce-4.10_7, xorg-7.7_1, >> xf86-video-vesa-2.3.3_5) :-/ .... Several online sites imply that it >> works OK, 1 specifically w/ FreeBSD 9 no less. Any clues appreciated, >> any more info gladly provided .... > This version is *ancient*. I would suggest trying qemu-devel instead, because > that provides qemu-2.2.0. Last time I tried it 0.11 with or without qkemu > crashed a lot. > > According to the website, qemu version 0.11 and up do not support kqemu > anymore (see http://wiki.qemu.org/KQEMU), so you don't need that anymore. > > In time (and if your processor is new enough to have “extended page tables”) I > guess qemu on FreeBSD could be replaced by the bhyve hypervisor that is now in > 10.x and is being developed further in HEAD. Currently bhyve can load FreeBSD, > OpenBSD, NetBSD and Linux guests. Support to run windoze as a guest will come > in the future. > > Roland CPU is AMD Jaguar Kabini, I would guess that'll do in time. Do I need to remove qemu when I install qemu-devel ? Does qemu-devel include already compiled up executables or is it a ports effort (no problema, just curious) ? I was a bit surprised at how old the qemu was, OpenBSD supposedly has newer, & I thought they were always behind FreeBSD for security .... Why is the qemu moribund ? -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 22:56:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43564A3D for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:56:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (smtp1.hushmail.com [65.39.178.135]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21E8E927 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp1.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 019B44010A for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w5.hushmail.com [65.39.178.80]) by smtp1.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:55:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 4A246A00E6; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:55:53 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:55:53 +0000 To: "Robert Schulze" Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found [FALSE ALERT - STILL UNRESOLVED] From: opendaddy@hushmail.com In-Reply-To: <54C7ADF2.3060604@bytecamp.net> References: <20150126141428.GA43445@holstein.holy.cow> <20150126145659.29F78C039D@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150126202502.GA40007@oslo.ath.cx> <20150126235409.BD7B7C039E@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127083223.GA46908@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127111042.6FDC9E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <54C775FE.6020501@pettijohn-web.com> <20150127114830.C35B7E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127125649.GA51008@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127130249.6B345E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127133152.GB51008@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127145833.9410CE03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127150840.BC37DE03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <54C7ADF2.3060604@bytecamp.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150127225553.4A246A00E6@smtp.hushmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:56:01 -0000 On 27. januar 2015 at 3:18 PM, "Robert Schulze" wrote: > >well, it must be called from somewhere. > >Maybe 'grep -r procmail /usr/local/etc/mail/' shows another >location in the config files. Good guess, but unfortunately there are no stray locations. Cc'ing you in the next email I'm about to send. O.D. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 27 22:56:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73298BBD for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (smtp3.hushmail.com [65.39.178.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B99E947 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 49FD1E0240 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:56:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w5.hushmail.com [65.39.178.80]) by smtp3.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:56:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 85321A00E6; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:56:50 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:56:50 +0000 To: "Herbert J. Skuhra" , "Robert Schulze" Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found [FALSE ALERT - STILL UNRESOLVED] From: opendaddy@hushmail.com In-Reply-To: <20150127160536.GC51008@oslo.ath.cx> References: <20150126235409.BD7B7C039E@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127083223.GA46908@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127111042.6FDC9E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <54C775FE.6020501@pettijohn-web.com> <20150127114830.C35B7E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127125649.GA51008@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127130249.6B345E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127133152.GB51008@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127145833.9410CE03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127150840.BC37DE03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127160536.GC51008@oslo.ath.cx> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150127225650.85321A00E6@smtp.hushmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, misc@opensmtpd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:56:58 -0000 On 27. januar 2015 at 3:58 PM, "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote: > > Please show output of 'smtpd -dv' It's quite big so I put it here instead: https://gist.github.com/anonymous/bf9b0a7e935d6e961c05 > and (user's) procmailrc. I don't have one actually. I'm using this approach: https://calomel.org/opensmtpd.html Thanks! O.D. > >On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 03:08:40PM +0000, opendaddy@hushmail.com >wrote: >> I apologize for the inconvenience, but the `procmail: not found` >errors are still there. >> >> As for aliases, it seems FreeBSD supports both /etc/mail/aliases >and /usr/local/etc/mail/aliases. >> >> O.D. >> >> On 27. januar 2015 at 2:51 PM, opendaddy@hushmail.com wrote: >> > >> >On 27. januar 2015 at 1:24 PM, "Herbert J. Skuhra" >> > wrote: >> >> >> >>Try /usr/local/etc/mail/aliases instead. >> >> >> > >> >Oh man -- that was it! Now getting `delivery: Ok`. >> > >> >Thank you so much. You and everyone else who chipped in. Time >to >> >send some emails. >> > >> >All the best, >> >O.D. >> > >> >_______________________________________________ >> >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- >> >unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> -- >> You received this mail because you are subscribed to >misc@opensmtpd.org >> To unsubscribe, send a mail to: misc+unsubscribe@opensmtpd.org >> From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 01:11:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DF777A9 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 01:11:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68D909C9 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 01:11:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-61.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.61]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0S1BppT026249 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 19:11:51 -0600 Message-ID: <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 19:18:06 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> In-Reply-To: <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 01:11:53 -0000 On 01/27/15 15:04, Roland Smith wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:08:58AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> >> .... FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5, qemu-0.11.1_18, kqemu-kmod-1.3.0.p11_12 ? I >> have tried w/ kqemu loaded & unloaded (recommended online), w/ >> -nographic, w/ -vga std, etc. No love. All I want to do is run a WinXP >> 32bit VM &/or a 64-bit Win7 VM from my desktop (xfce-4.10_7, xorg-7.7_1, >> xf86-video-vesa-2.3.3_5) :-/ .... Several online sites imply that it >> works OK, 1 specifically w/ FreeBSD 9 no less. Any clues appreciated, >> any more info gladly provided .... > This version is *ancient*. I would suggest trying qemu-devel instead, because > that provides qemu-2.2.0. Last time I tried it 0.11 with or without qkemu > crashed a lot. > > According to the website, qemu version 0.11 and up do not support kqemu > anymore (see http://wiki.qemu.org/KQEMU), so you don't need that anymore. > > In time (and if your processor is new enough to have “extended page tables”) I > guess qemu on FreeBSD could be replaced by the bhyve hypervisor that is now in > 10.x and is being developed further in HEAD. Currently bhyve can load FreeBSD, > OpenBSD, NetBSD and Linux guests. Support to run windoze as a guest will come > in the future. > > Roland OK, I have qemu-devel compiled & installed, kqemu unloaded from the kernel, & (hopefully) a build of a VM underway, command-line: qemu -cdrom ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon -vga std -nographic -no-acpi -localtime, w/ qemu softlinked to qemu-system-x86_64 in /usr/local/bin. How long is this expected to take :-) ? TIA & thx for everything so far .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 02:50:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 764E6447 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 02:50:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x234.google.com (mail-lb0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E749E5EF for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 02:50:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f180.google.com with SMTP id b6so16329159lbj.11 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 18:50:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=TKuQuwmTUROwyzQSwtcPYfRX+SnpxrshZN5FZ7eS0+k=; b=W+vcz0lOklK+oz0pWT+ivDVtrYWQ+PuBafHUzGB7oulKkHugC3GEd6aL2Z4Pe1UT5Y n97RZWc4FK2cf4a6aeQXpaDgt1XKTTwSJHwPrZlgUbARtwdnUVXDOTC4x+gVlE8EMD9D dXHEZ+fd6IEQTvimsYwVjudNQW29X/KhQ8iTEst1esz/5uLNPGHlv5Qkz/ryImUMBL8K lx1TPyBkBokrUMqYmWWFcoByHWNJBwesgG6IBrIzrrqPiPZcoj6U3YPy5VR4/vvYvkhO hfRRO5Z6eX3klCbHRUhwFc2s1niidWx0DeJ8/OmLZ7Rw7RntZ1pwCH5xL81zm+Xazgam 6TMQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.203.230 with SMTP id kt6mr5211927lac.38.1422413439881; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 18:50:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.161.1 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 18:50:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <54B37A5F.5050302@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 20:50:39 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: freebsd-update questions From: Andrew Gould To: "Brian W." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 02:50:42 -0000 On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Brian W. wrote: > A key thing to watch for in the conf files is that markers will be put in > place so you can see what's new; those need to be deleted. > When I attempted an upgrade to 10.1-RELEASE, I got a message that certain configuration files couldn't be merged and that I should hit the enter button to merge them manually in vi. In vi, the first line was a series of left pointing arrows and a reference to version 10.0. That was followed by the content of the new configuration file. (I think it was new because the lines I added to the existing files weren't there.) The last line was a series of right pointing errors and a reference to version 10.1. What am I supposed to do to keep the old configuration file contents? There are no instructions. Thanks, Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 04:11:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 845A2606 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 04:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F149F19 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 04:11:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-158.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.158]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0S4BYwa009171 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:11:35 -0600 Message-ID: <54C862ED.6050704@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:17:49 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 04:11:37 -0000 On 01/27/15 19:18, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 01/27/15 15:04, Roland Smith wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:08:58AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>> >>> .... FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5, qemu-0.11.1_18, kqemu-kmod-1.3.0.p11_12 >>> ? I >>> have tried w/ kqemu loaded & unloaded (recommended online), w/ >>> -nographic, w/ -vga std, etc. No love. All I want to do is run a WinXP >>> 32bit VM &/or a 64-bit Win7 VM from my desktop (xfce-4.10_7, >>> xorg-7.7_1, >>> xf86-video-vesa-2.3.3_5) :-/ .... Several online sites imply that it >>> works OK, 1 specifically w/ FreeBSD 9 no less. Any clues appreciated, >>> any more info gladly provided .... >> This version is *ancient*. I would suggest trying qemu-devel instead, >> because >> that provides qemu-2.2.0. Last time I tried it 0.11 with or without >> qkemu >> crashed a lot. >> >> According to the website, qemu version 0.11 and up do not support kqemu >> anymore (see http://wiki.qemu.org/KQEMU), so you don't need that >> anymore. >> >> In time (and if your processor is new enough to have “extended page >> tables”) I >> guess qemu on FreeBSD could be replaced by the bhyve hypervisor that >> is now in >> 10.x and is being developed further in HEAD. Currently bhyve can load >> FreeBSD, >> OpenBSD, NetBSD and Linux guests. Support to run windoze as a guest >> will come >> in the future. >> >> Roland > > OK, I have qemu-devel compiled & installed, kqemu unloaded from the > kernel, & (hopefully) a build of a VM underway, command-line: qemu > -cdrom ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu > athlon -vga std -nographic -no-acpi -localtime, w/ qemu softlinked > to qemu-system-x86_64 in /usr/local/bin. How long is this expected to > take :-) ? TIA & thx for everything so far .... Well, I killed this after 5+ hrs & tried the same command w/ qemu-system-i386, killed it after 54 min. Both gave a small bit of gibberish in the CLI window I started them in, then nothing until killed :-/ .... Is anyone onlist successfully using qemu-devel 2.2.0 under FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5 w/ windoze VM's :-) ? TIA .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 07:15:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8228D7FB for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:15:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net (lb3-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net [194.109.24.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06725641 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:15:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.home ([83.162.243.5]) by smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net with ESMTP id lKEh1p00907iGuj01KEiPD; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:14:42 +0100 Received: by slackbox.erewhon.home (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5FAE6123EB; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:14:41 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:14:41 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... Message-ID: <20150128071441.GA29698@slackbox.erewhon.home> Mail-Followup-To: "William A. Mahaffey III" , FreeBSD Questions !!!! References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:15:56 -0000 --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 07:18:06PM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 01/27/15 15:04, Roland Smith wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:08:58AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> > >> .... FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5, qemu-0.11.1_18, kqemu-kmod-1.3.0.p11_12 ?= I > >> have tried w/ kqemu loaded & unloaded (recommended online), w/ > >> -nographic, w/ -vga std, etc. No love. All I want to do is run a WinXP > >> 32bit VM &/or a 64-bit Win7 VM from my desktop (xfce-4.10_7, xorg-7.7_= 1, > >> xf86-video-vesa-2.3.3_5) :-/ .... Several online sites imply that it > >> works OK, 1 specifically w/ FreeBSD 9 no less. Any clues appreciated, > >> any more info gladly provided .... > > This version is *ancient*. I would suggest trying qemu-devel instead, b= ecause > > that provides qemu-2.2.0. Last time I tried it 0.11 with or without qke= mu > > crashed a lot. > > > > According to the website, qemu version 0.11 and up do not support kqemu > > anymore (see http://wiki.qemu.org/KQEMU), so you don't need that anymor= e. > > > > In time (and if your processor is new enough to have =E2=80=9Cextended = page tables=E2=80=9D) I > > guess qemu on FreeBSD could be replaced by the bhyve hypervisor that is= now in > > 10.x and is being developed further in HEAD. Currently bhyve can load F= reeBSD, > > OpenBSD, NetBSD and Linux guests. Support to run windoze as a guest wil= l come > > in the future. > > > > Roland >=20 > OK, I have qemu-devel compiled & installed, kqemu unloaded from the=20 > kernel, & (hopefully) a build of a VM underway, command-line: qemu=20 > -cdrom ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon = =20 > -vga std -nographic -no-acpi -localtime, w/ qemu softlinked to=20 > qemu-system-x86_64 in /usr/local/bin. How long is this expected to take= =20 > :-) ? TIA & thx for everything so far .... If you are using a 64-bit build of XP the GUI should come up pretty fast. Installing XP will seem to take ages. :-) Trying to run a 32-bit XP on a 64-bit emulator won't work at all, IIRC. I think it won't even boot. Depending on which windows programs you need to run, there is a pre-built 32-bit Wine for AMD64 available in ports. That might run them faster because it's not a VM. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 5753 3324 1661 B0FE 8D93 FCED 40F6 D5DC A38A 33E0 (keyID: A38A33E0) --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJUyIxhAAoJEED21dyjijPgcfEQAIqbeP60VLzq0i6gMAvqzCyG stF9OhNtIEwlYvcZdSreQGGy8Jh4yetr+LRQmt0N+3lk4WqATazhBMJvUBeaN1yM tduVzaeuSa2pa1N71USzWxMJuCp4W1rUMtG1eJH2wwxFkod+th8Iwzf7CY1f5ZT9 azQBdVEOZ2s2KimURK9VEnQzgoytE52/dMiWq1ni60DGQa1Fws4oRmGz3sqQW8Mh /VLInZfOcnCYrl0YRtUzVd8RnYYwU9nJrMo6NitOADF8sBKevn7fmgl8iVvDEVPs wQ2z5NShZ9BRilio2tf6vZYShyw9MfEYQsoJqITSr6BX+aImjyXQTdj4d/Jz0Yqe V8+XATMO6TRtn1V0SkfuOyPMryoMSdWBE0D88OsAjMSm13/CuU2gaO1zoOhRRgGv FxSPy6OcB7oGXpXPjoQdHH9hBtSazz8XEixgMmLaVK7A683cI4H8HEcUHMyfuwoy prmkGY6rKlD62Y2R9oLs2W0v5LBGBYzvabjz8McTfCh6GrLtiPL/pHjz4fu+JLqB UQ/4DJWvEFxIjJTcQV2+f0Yi9ENNFmSoHBArFGKeeFF7CGfb2B7Y34YTkv/Z2Geh iorZm3hV2qo0qSXPPm0Yw5U2lfR3vSNrDpIeR9LtWVSSZB2hywDb4ZYVrSofNbRu abVX3h43Wg5HC8iBF2/y =m36b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 07:16:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B516897 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 896CA657 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:16:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from worm.infracaninophle.co.uk (worm.infracaninophle.co.uk [81.2.117.101] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t0S7G5uG072574 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:16:12 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t0S7G5uG072574 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1422429373; bh=Ynx6uSiXaVki37qQKq1BMvYsRTEpd0Ljk/wKBUvxrcg=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Wed,=2028=20Jan=202015=2007:15:52=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20Andrew=20Gould =20,=20=0D=0A=20"Brian=20W."=20|CC:=20FreeBSD=20Mailing=20List=20|Subject:=20Re:=20freebsd-update=20questions|Referen ces:=20=09<54B37A5F.5050302@infracaninophile.co.uk>=09=09=20|In-Reply-To:=20; b=pjDujrM61HJlivDSDOi0vMRS6H6FgFFdIvt05cZOHyJJPEGt8+8cmu8zQ3nwxDSnf EQf8L5m4yOfGRA8z6b/8oobE2rSbGHvnN6cSEAv92DGSKNgJdmubU0EoKwK12V03TL rvsa3/wtWsH45JB5TVGH3r9INPkZvEqnDx0RNUn0= Message-ID: <54C88CA8.7010808@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:15:52 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Gould , "Brian W." Subject: Re: freebsd-update questions References: <54B37A5F.5050302@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GUG8l7kPstdPnwpuGQGRfSoUWlkFqHcxW" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:16:24 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --GUG8l7kPstdPnwpuGQGRfSoUWlkFqHcxW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2015/01/28 02:50, Andrew Gould wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Brian W. wrot= e: >=20 >> A key thing to watch for in the conf files is that markers will be put= in >> place so you can see what's new; those need to be deleted. >> > When I attempted an upgrade to 10.1-RELEASE, I got a message that certa= in > configuration files couldn't be merged and that I should hit the enter > button to merge them manually in vi. >=20 > In vi, the first line was a series of left pointing arrows and a refere= nce > to version 10.0. That was followed by the content of the new > configuration file. (I think it was new because the lines I added to th= e > existing files weren't there.) >=20 > The last line was a series of right pointing errors and a reference to > version 10.1. >=20 > What am I supposed to do to keep the old configuration file contents? > There are no instructions. This is freebsd-update asking you to resolve conflicts in a three-way merge between the file as supplied with the old version of FreeBSD, the equivalent in the new version, and the file that is actually present on your system. The >>>>>>>>, =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D and <<<<<<<< mark= ers are a standard convention for indicating where there were areas of the file that were changed differently between old --> new and old --> what's on your system: what is generally called a 'merge conflict.' Edit the file so it has the contents you want. The sections indicated by >>>>>>> etc markers are usually smaller than the whole file. It's important to remove all the markers in those files, or various things may not start up correctly when you reboot. Cheers, Matthew --GUG8l7kPstdPnwpuGQGRfSoUWlkFqHcxW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUyIy2AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnhHkP/jfoUeF1e8oB19ixNQ7hJF7p A31DAPTTR+B0Amd5LkZfVzhgHLGH2ImoEIEiLDz+xgrh2G+IZ4D6a7XcwqQ1MReu 94oud5vH8eCbISJbATorHOAjtD/SshMUSkq0I/KZbwML6FH2XJTyU66p53AQYMbl erlUFStQu2pdnbihgqL+3K0xW0aTO8gxlbvoLQFW1YrdpH+8hROrwgInCAglylOO bUR7ESPiLRLDTg0IRcVVTQkEG++EeZZesiT4vGsLI3OyQBMBMT6tAul8vnZOPIWz ljbUFctMz4D/1qXCJUfdb1ip0pr8aNoVd1YxgUMAA3Aa51h6gG7N7BsV68mQ4iuR 4tbiAFNcpylAXJr6NKZFUtJGdpSX+fcdEHADNA8f0s4lbvy6cgzSKHLUomB+O5Ia A0agle8wtJC0vyhoeUr7B9eXnAYw0Jm2IsR8gF7QE+spSRIVuE/nmS8bki8YQdht zNE/ly2oeOcybtzT+Rdc+zHJ+1ga1JHi0AIRE7WpiTF8wc4OrThSzDY72pxIG5zb SxFg/c/EezYuCBDJe2F++bvMQzhHQVcNRoEGY+or3SHtfvJT4IXLFm8sg4NHBGk+ VUKJqpk8fvbS3R00NZGGCElP1RpH6uU+rmiEQDx8b7b9l+1YbqiF0k7g8YzUmkNw n/nXQI4JqyFSE2e9n4eP =gIqc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GUG8l7kPstdPnwpuGQGRfSoUWlkFqHcxW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 07:36:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67BDD6B for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:36:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "SDF.ORG" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D4EC8B8 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:36:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.org (IDENT:bennett@otaku.freeshell.org [192.94.73.9]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0S7ZrJk016867 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO); Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:35:53 GMT Received: (from bennett@localhost) by sdf.org (8.14.8/8.12.8/Submit) id t0S7ZqRD021239; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 01:35:52 -0600 (CST) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <201501280735.t0S7ZqRD021239@sdf.org> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 01:35:52 -0600 To: wblock@wonkity.com Subject: Re: buildworld, buildkernel, and devel/cache References: <201501261245.t0QCjUMD009768@sdf.org> <201501261843.t0QIhX78006200@sdf.org> <201501271240.t0RCe9GA006605@sdf.org> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 6/20/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:36:03 -0000 Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015, Scott Bennett wrote: > > >> I might have missed something, so let's back up. Shell variables need > >> to be set, and entries in make.conf need to be added. Both are needed. > > > > Yes. I guess I'm missing your point. I followed the instructions in > > /usr/local/share/doc/ccache/ccache-howto-freebsd.txt, which turned out to > > cause errors on the three lines in question from those instructions. I then > > followed your suggestion to move them, and that was ineffective in .profile > > and caused errors in .cshrc.extensions. So I don't see how those particular > > shell variables are to be set. > > The only other entry for /etc/make.conf is the entry that, by itself, > > is sufficient to build ports using ccache, and that, as I noted originally, > > was working just fine. With CCACHE_DIR set in .profile and set as an > > environment variable in .cshrc.extensions, ports even get built okay with > > ccache cacheing its data in the correct file system. (Yay!) > > But if there are other /etc/make.conf entries needed (but undocumented?) > > or other shell/environment variables needed (also undocumented?) to get > > buildworld and buildkernel to use ccache, the please clarify. > > I just reinstalled devel/ccache to test this. The options to create > links to clang and llvm were turned on in the port. My old settings in > /root/.cshrc were uncommented: > > setenv PATH /usr/local/libexec/ccache:$PATH > setenv CCACHE_PATH /usr/bin:/usr/local/bin > setenv CCACHE_DIR /usr/.ccache > setenv CCACHE_COMPRESS yes > > The last two are additions. (I found that compression helped fit more > files in the same space without measurably slowing down the build.) Thanks for that comment. I had left compression disabled because I was worried about the time requirement. On your tip, I added the same line to .cshrc.extensions. > > In /etc/make.conf, I added this: > > .if (!empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/src*) || !empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/obj*)) Huh. The above line is not present in the installed /usr/local/share/doc/ccache/ccache-howto-freebsd.txt file on my system. Maybe I should reinstall devel/ccache to see if an updated, corrected version appears? > .if !defined(NOCCACHE) && exists(/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc) In the line above, everything before the "&&" is missing in the doc file. > CC:=${CC:C,^cc,/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc,1} > CXX:=${CXX:C,^c\+\+,/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/c++,1} In the line above, the pluses are not escaped in the installed doc file. > .endif > .endif And the two .endif lines are also missing in the doc file. I replaced the three lines in my /etc/make.conf with the lines you show above, and now it all works beautifully. Thank you very, very much. > > This is on 10.1-STABLE. make(1) changed a while back, so very old > versions of FreeBSD might have errors with those. I'm running 10.1-STABLE. > > I logged back in as root and started a buildworld, and see this: > > /usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc -m32 ... > > > And thanks, Walter, for your attention to this. > > You're welcome, Steve. :) Oh, good grief! I apologize most profusely for the typo, Warren. I don't know why I typed that, but will chalk it up to yet another of my infamous posting-hours-past-my-bedtime brain farts. Sigh. :-( Thanks again, though. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at sdf.org *xor* bennett at freeshell.org * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 07:44:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F4116A9 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com (mail-lb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B5BE9AE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id l4so17254023lbv.3 for ; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 23:44:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=jguXFP4isiPNz4N+47rGdSqdkyf0Awp54nkzLHyofEs=; b=hOCW1yxQ3+qqsCLs1NdDg1B16/odoQ98gMRBLXpcno6BDQH+afK0NtN7DMyFGDlW85 4WulHq1mo2jrADfT9ZRbNVHczzzAPZf0sxUCswuVZ7M/pSDU5TaQvaSbjnXIidPm9oUN 6qqEgvjlY82pcnKagKUuuA0NRFTj7bqM3mXKkOVcNWzgNLcWYKmhof/EJjwVWQQtBtVo cuN3OkvlQ1mr8Uu5iUftl3jaOFvZq+qD2B99u+U29DyVxBlP++yXXmCg3CAt6+grqbzR aNQRx1s3h43CjHDPGDF30dy9g8kfEV/SyRSeO1X2j/iyanGRpi0nvChyHipG/jah8sH+ RT+g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.203.230 with SMTP id kt6mr6158615lac.38.1422431084903; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 23:44:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.161.1 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Jan 2015 23:44:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54C88CA8.7010808@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <54B37A5F.5050302@infracaninophile.co.uk> <54C88CA8.7010808@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 01:44:44 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: freebsd-update questions From: Andrew Gould To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "Brian W." , FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:44:47 -0000 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 1:15 AM, Matthew Seaman < m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > On 2015/01/28 02:50, Andrew Gould wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Brian W. > wrote: > > > >> A key thing to watch for in the conf files is that markers will be put > in > >> place so you can see what's new; those need to be deleted. > >> > > When I attempted an upgrade to 10.1-RELEASE, I got a message that certain > > configuration files couldn't be merged and that I should hit the enter > > button to merge them manually in vi. > > > > In vi, the first line was a series of left pointing arrows and a > reference > > to version 10.0. That was followed by the content of the new > > configuration file. (I think it was new because the lines I added to the > > existing files weren't there.) > > > > The last line was a series of right pointing errors and a reference to > > version 10.1. > > > > What am I supposed to do to keep the old configuration file contents? > > There are no instructions. > > This is freebsd-update asking you to resolve conflicts in a three-way > merge between the file as supplied with the old version of FreeBSD, the > equivalent in the new version, and the file that is actually present on > your system. The >>>>>>>>, ========= and <<<<<<<< markers are a > standard convention for indicating where there were areas of the file > that were changed differently between old --> new and old --> what's on > your system: what is generally called a 'merge conflict.' > > Edit the file so it has the contents you want. The sections indicated > by >>>>>>> etc markers are usually smaller than the whole file. It's > important to remove all the markers in those files, or various things > may not start up correctly when you reboot. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > > I am being asked to manually merge master.passwd and passwd. Rather than risk making a mistake on the passwords, can I copy the files from /etc/ to /var/db/freebsd-update/merge/new/etc/? Thanks, Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 08:08:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78654B05 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:08:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01DC8BCC for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t0S881eZ074080 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:08:08 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t0S881eZ074080 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1422432488; bh=eimA3lc+AxLDLfhVjfUHpoU66raqvIlWSl63zUx3x+I=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Wed,=2028=20Jan=202015=2008:07:53=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20Andrew=20Gould =20|CC:=20"Brian=20W."=20,=20=0D=0A=20FreeBSD=20Mailing=20List=20|Subject:=20Re:=20freebsd-update=20questions|Referen ces:=20=09<54B37A5F.5050302@infracaninophile.co.uk>=09=09=09=09<54C88CA8.7010808@infracaninophile.co.uk>=20|In-Reply -To:=20; b=OJ0Z4VYX4nE5RoEowU4aR2AS/80T1Kz3vEeUyXk4EVJIdz0srrYMufej5P3HwurC7 E4F8WVnrNKTh3n4AiyOYeX+0QKOXZ1uklipBT+Iel5lRgT+Bgy6tb0KxU0qivgOrOE 7aVR4fqgkOoHWCAHoix8/+KLRMsRE8uq2aR1cKSk= Message-ID: <54C898D9.6000900@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:07:53 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Gould Subject: Re: freebsd-update questions References: <54B37A5F.5050302@infracaninophile.co.uk> <54C88CA8.7010808@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: OpenPGP: id=E1ECF9BB Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v3spcCqVfrk51rpfjHlc9gep5CsuVFdJb" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: "Brian W." , FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:08:14 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --v3spcCqVfrk51rpfjHlc9gep5CsuVFdJb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 28/01/2015 07:44, Andrew Gould wrote: > I am being asked to manually merge master.passwd and passwd. Rather th= an > risk making a mistake on the passwords, can I copy the files from /etc/= to > /var/db/freebsd-update/merge/new/etc/? What you are editing is a copy of the master.passwd file held in freebsd-update's work area, which it will only move into place once you run 'freebsd-update install' So fluffing the merge edit is not going to immediately screw up your system. It should be possible to overwrite the copy of master.passwd in freebsd-update's prep area -- no idea if that works, but I can't see any reason why not. However it's not a usual thing to do, and you'ld be better advised to not screw up the merge edits. One thing that may help you: by default freebsd-update uses vi as the default editor for these merge conflict resolutions. You can substitute whatever editor you prefer simply by setting the EDITOR environment variable before you start. Many editors will recognise you're dealing with a merge conflict and put you into a special mode to make that easier= =2E I don't know why it's asking you about /etc/passwd as that's a file derived directly from master.passwd -- don't worry too much about it, and just run 'pwd_mkdb -p' before you reboot. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk --v3spcCqVfrk51rpfjHlc9gep5CsuVFdJb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUyJjhXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATJuIP/3t5t39I9i8DCow3RVhnC3mA gaL7jvu+5BczSzHD/E8ilSvvVgaqUvORczir04IIuL10RbnCOjUy7NsZw0UfXzUW rK0qs4YeaOsB9MxrJUPeOUp2lRruEGMVbB56k7injNdIsOz+Kb/zY6Ut3p9FFniy VxF/8ykQfbmB4gS3rjo9QU03kpzERKuPYCc+Y5sEoyQscMvPfuZnicB0fqz/q44J 4BFKRMlAs1lnleaXXTQOyDxoKQOyhCy9hpZm+osDek0nU0gojerl/Li32v7Y+ktY WKs+KSMwqvUHTrHjgqLad2BvPxzJTYMRkjH2fNp4+e7cGepF7GUoICzhmmAS9xfb MsWdXmsanjb/AIcWo5jOD0fG1QiBhI97DFUVbaNtig7MGTAxRVdfE9fqIzAI4Mxn oSVZKtL1r529OIBLIZfEpHTuQxJxVQtpHdaclAVVt6tOOhRv7VHeSd/XLlWRdKj/ wgcZxSDc9LTGMBHMzjRVz/1q90+dugmuZL3W8/dZ9xbg0F6JlEI+pbqpe1rULh3d HU+0udQfz0Huswap9oYRHJp0qRVntAQxwlXC5jaKmLGwv8RcRxfYKGo2ERx5vrQ/ m2thVeWHXtBL4I4eJtKlSEfr/qbAMjFMDYCg3kC4KkmxQFOIwAsUBq2r7ITXjSvU PODUFTiuzVsjNlNFwlg0 =afaf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --v3spcCqVfrk51rpfjHlc9gep5CsuVFdJb-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 08:11:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8302FBB6 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62639C79 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 16DFC6D86BAB; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:11:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:11:45 -0800 From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: php55 change on datetime functions? Message-ID: <20150128081145.GA17133@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:11:46 -0000 --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I just recently did an upgrade; I am now at: FreeBSD home.parts-unknown.org 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 r277815: = Tue Jan 27 16:02:25 PST 2015 root@home.parts-unknown.org:/usr/obj/usr/s= rc/sys/GENERIC amd64 I have updated as many of my ports as I could. All of a sudden, my Drupal site is throwing errors whenever I try to add content. It's logging: PDOException: SQLSTATE[22007]: Invalid datetime format: 1366 Incorrect string value: '\xF0\x9F\x92\x9B\xF0\x9F...' The Drupal code hasn't changed since version 7.34 came out in November (and it's even been a while since I updated any modules). So I'm assuming this is really a PHP thing. But I have no idea what to do about it. --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUyJnAAAoJEBV64x4SNmArPqQQAK8/aOKeTDAa4BFk7RO15j85 rdyYF4gOz5rqNWXhpKTCQCVBsPrT3tppgU9+MCVsd9TzMiOF3S4HjCqYjLJd7C3W Z5gSKGjPo9KTSJqVqI4GPYaqpbSGpmSxg0SOV0e9NLeqaE/2geOZHwTpsNXulWew BJYd4VDIO/+VwDJyPMotunAiPun2biQ7WKjOihD70upwGEA7lyXbOW7M+P1FPVRX YDuAL44PbTB8Na3VKRkH0spXhvbF1OI8olgnlZWlI8OGDyW9HGrcwAsV0yCHfX/H fIumlYHoyds6oanFpHcY69F4aRZhvVFmNXCtl07uaoGeIkwCZZIE78rv3/xtnXba 41o0sR+j0JWVKDIx6+VJvyk1TRI6xGGsRKsqCsaFKoX1mqwnmi+OybM8f3K9+ZZK 24PS5yTpdIFLztc0bDU/3s1eq0tw7pSVJtIzFg9KXD6x4WHl1A8QjY4AjTuCPJdA 9qN00YVX9zjtvTmD0t/83H+R6HiXpwbjOg2kwXO040O3sSYaB75aDnyRqLT2fk3y xUQbEXx7DdbWpUOqxrPnqANN7MSZym8HUYHUVSYpVTteX9TQ3MlqedTS7VU30KpY ZKtK36/6flbDQrro0hkaFTgkEEv9KAycHfnZppGZ9GbauiehuBF36/M12zprqZCd MztiqrTpSW/VRM+hBVYr =Yyb1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 08:37:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 013641A5 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x230.google.com (mail-lb0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FB8FE93 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f176.google.com with SMTP id z12so17350284lbi.7 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:37:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=CelWCOa/HJA4mOVeT69xeGOfhh9z/xNuZSjbX0bmMsM=; b=WuGH5l3VF061JOm+6AfgPo/t8SYEKWrAKm6tgcFFtSaBa420/layBBCdF89uhybMsE gnGUyfYzA2uUTTKViEjVoBrxX/T6zdvrhACrA/wPm17g4OOpIQy+G2+3jXN0obEophAF JWMUCut1IsC7qf1dSYMPH8iBRjopszkwZOyBc7KBL51r7gnlhXKLnLzcapECd5B4gCnk RhF/VJld+SLr/42uk0SyOYOjz4lnHTwhMY3jNLe+MvR+HeZZmjw3ctd08BSZTKwczRjr n5F+/zM33vwKXbtfKNxgx3EHhuWFaGU5NLHsxth3g+B4qa+mMXnqg9ZVEQcOZ4j4jwdQ kbRw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.129.195 with SMTP id ny3mr6617983lbb.10.1422434230300; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:37:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.25.161.1 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 00:37:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54C898D9.6000900@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <54B37A5F.5050302@infracaninophile.co.uk> <54C88CA8.7010808@infracaninophile.co.uk> <54C898D9.6000900@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 02:37:10 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: freebsd-update questions From: Andrew Gould To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "Brian W." , FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:37:13 -0000 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Matthew Seaman < m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > On 28/01/2015 07:44, Andrew Gould wrote: > > I am being asked to manually merge master.passwd and passwd. Rather than > > risk making a mistake on the passwords, can I copy the files from /etc/ > to > > /var/db/freebsd-update/merge/new/etc/? > > What you are editing is a copy of the master.passwd file held in > freebsd-update's work area, which it will only move into place once you > run 'freebsd-update install' So fluffing the merge edit is not going to > immediately screw up your system. It should be possible to overwrite > the copy of master.passwd in freebsd-update's prep area -- no idea if > that works, but I can't see any reason why not. However it's not a > usual thing to do, and you'ld be better advised to not screw up the > merge edits. > > One thing that may help you: by default freebsd-update uses vi as the > default editor for these merge conflict resolutions. You can substitute > whatever editor you prefer simply by setting the EDITOR environment > variable before you start. Many editors will recognise you're dealing > with a merge conflict and put you into a special mode to make that easier. > > I don't know why it's asking you about /etc/passwd as that's a file > derived directly from master.passwd -- don't worry too much about it, > and just run 'pwd_mkdb -p' before you reboot. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. > > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey > JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk > > Thank you for your help. Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 08:42:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 839F889E for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:42:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from oslo.ath.cx (oslo.ath.cx [IPv6:2a01:4f8:200:42e4::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "oslo.ath.cx", Issuer "oslo.ath.cx" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1D9EF8C for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:42:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by oslo.ath.cx (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 6d282527; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:42:13 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:42:13 +0100 From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: opendaddy@hushmail.com Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found [FALSE ALERT - STILL UNRESOLVED] Message-ID: <20150128084213.GA89054@oslo.ath.cx> References: <20150127111042.6FDC9E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <54C775FE.6020501@pettijohn-web.com> <20150127114830.C35B7E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127125649.GA51008@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127130249.6B345E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127133152.GB51008@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127145833.9410CE03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127150840.BC37DE03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127160536.GC51008@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127225650.85321A00E6@smtp.hushmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150127225650.85321A00E6@smtp.hushmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, misc@opensmtpd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:42:17 -0000 On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:56:50PM +0000, opendaddy@hushmail.com wrote: > On 27. januar 2015 at 3:58 PM, "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote: > > > > Please show output of 'smtpd -dv' > > It's quite big so I put it here instead: > > https://gist.github.com/anonymous/bf9b0a7e935d6e961c05 > > > and (user's) procmailrc. > > I don't have one actually. I'm using this approach: > > https://calomel.org/opensmtpd.html This is still your config, right? ---- listen on 127.0.0.1 port 25 table aliases db:/etc/mail/aliases.db accept for local deliver to mda "/usr/local/bin/procmail -f -" accept from any for domain "mydomain.com" deliver to mda "/usr/local/bin/procmail -f -" accept from local for any relay ---- I've missed the "table aliases..." line. Remove the 'table aliases...' line, put your aliases in /usr/local/etc/mail/aliases and run newaliases. Or add 'alias ' to your accept line. 2. There are only test mails in your queue, right? Please remove them and try sending new e-mails while running 'smtpd -dv'. 3. If you still get the error "procmail: not found" add a new user and send him a test e-mail. -- Herbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 10:04:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6998E12D for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avasout08.plus.net (avasout08.plus.net [212.159.14.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE66DADD for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:04:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout08 with smtp id lN1P1p003516WCc01N1QRZ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:01:24 +0000 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=D6jJK5hj c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=YNv0rlydsVwA:10 a=R_4_8qS_AAAA:8 a=3qwbKGwn-neA9Fce3lMA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=B3NsJvm5tdUA:10 a=g3L1QcB-zvgA:10 a=Xv4Ta-DLJz0A:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YGPR3-0000up-IF; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:01:23 +0000 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:01:21 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Message-ID: <20150128100121.2cca4524@curlew.lan> In-Reply-To: <54C862ED.6050704@hiwaay.net> References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> <54C862ED.6050704@hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mike@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:04:37 -0000 On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:17:49 -0600 "William A. Mahaffey III" wrote: > Is anyone onlist successfully using qemu-devel 2.2.0 under > FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5 w/ windoze VM's It's a long time since I tried qemu. I'm running Virtualbox (emulators/virtualbox-ose) instead and Windows XP runs fine with it. For best results you need to install virtualbox guest additions for Windows on the guest system. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 11:27:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 884C275F for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.hushmail.com (smtp2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 662913E0 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp2.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 62E21A0247 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:27:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.46]) by smtp2.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id A29F6E03D7; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:27:39 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:27:39 +0000 To: "Herbert J. Skuhra" Subject: Re: opensmtpd: procmail: not found [DROPPED - DON'T NEED PROCMAIL IN THE FIRST PLACE] From: opendaddy@hushmail.com In-Reply-To: <20150128084213.GA89054@oslo.ath.cx> References: <20150127111042.6FDC9E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <54C775FE.6020501@pettijohn-web.com> <20150127114830.C35B7E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127125649.GA51008@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127130249.6B345E03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127133152.GB51008@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127145833.9410CE03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127150840.BC37DE03D5@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150127160536.GC51008@oslo.ath.cx> <20150127225650.85321A00E6@smtp.hushmail.com> <20150128084213.GA89054@oslo.ath.cx> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150128112739.A29F6E03D7@smtp.hushmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, misc@opensmtpd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:27:42 -0000 Dear Herbert, Thank you so much for guiding me through all of this but I just realized I don't really need procmail in the first place. Besides, being used to all these pretty configs from pf and opensmtpd, procmail's .procmailrc / .forward was a real letdown anyway. All the best, O.D. On 28. januar 2015 at 8:35 AM, "Herbert J. Skuhra" wrote: > >On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:56:50PM +0000, opendaddy@hushmail.com >wrote: >> On 27. januar 2015 at 3:58 PM, "Herbert J. Skuhra" > wrote: >> > >> > Please show output of 'smtpd -dv' >> >> It's quite big so I put it here instead: >> >> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/bf9b0a7e935d6e961c05 >> >> > and (user's) procmailrc. >> >> I don't have one actually. I'm using this approach: >> >> https://calomel.org/opensmtpd.html > >This is still your config, right? > >---- >listen on 127.0.0.1 port 25 > >table aliases db:/etc/mail/aliases.db > >accept for local deliver to mda "/usr/local/bin/procmail -f -" >accept from any for domain "mydomain.com" deliver to mda >"/usr/local/bin/procmail -f -" > >accept from local for any relay >---- > >I've missed the "table aliases..." line. > >Remove the 'table aliases...' line, put your aliases in >/usr/local/etc/mail/aliases and run newaliases. >Or add 'alias ' to your accept line. > >2. There are only test mails in your queue, right? Please remove >them and >try sending new e-mails while running 'smtpd -dv'. > >3. If you still get the error "procmail: not found" add a new user >and >send him a test e-mail. > >-- >Herbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 14:13:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 895BCBCA for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:13:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51D47969 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:13:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-152.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0SEDGcw031301 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:13:17 -0600 Message-ID: <54C8EFF3.6050803@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:19:31 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> <20150128071441.GA29698@slackbox.erewhon.home> In-Reply-To: <20150128071441.GA29698@slackbox.erewhon.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:13:19 -0000 On 01/28/15 01:14, Roland Smith wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 07:18:06PM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> On 01/27/15 15:04, Roland Smith wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:08:58AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>>> .... FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5, qemu-0.11.1_18, kqemu-kmod-1.3.0.p11_12 ? I >>>> have tried w/ kqemu loaded & unloaded (recommended online), w/ >>>> -nographic, w/ -vga std, etc. No love. All I want to do is run a WinXP >>>> 32bit VM &/or a 64-bit Win7 VM from my desktop (xfce-4.10_7, xorg-7.7_1, >>>> xf86-video-vesa-2.3.3_5) :-/ .... Several online sites imply that it >>>> works OK, 1 specifically w/ FreeBSD 9 no less. Any clues appreciated, >>>> any more info gladly provided .... >>> This version is *ancient*. I would suggest trying qemu-devel instead, because >>> that provides qemu-2.2.0. Last time I tried it 0.11 with or without qkemu >>> crashed a lot. >>> >>> According to the website, qemu version 0.11 and up do not support kqemu >>> anymore (see http://wiki.qemu.org/KQEMU), so you don't need that anymore. >>> >>> In time (and if your processor is new enough to have “extended page tables”) I >>> guess qemu on FreeBSD could be replaced by the bhyve hypervisor that is now in >>> 10.x and is being developed further in HEAD. Currently bhyve can load FreeBSD, >>> OpenBSD, NetBSD and Linux guests. Support to run windoze as a guest will come >>> in the future. >>> >>> Roland >> OK, I have qemu-devel compiled & installed, kqemu unloaded from the >> kernel, & (hopefully) a build of a VM underway, command-line: qemu >> -cdrom ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon >> -vga std -nographic -no-acpi -localtime, w/ qemu softlinked to >> qemu-system-x86_64 in /usr/local/bin. How long is this expected to take >> :-) ? TIA & thx for everything so far .... > If you are using a 64-bit build of XP the GUI should come up pretty fast. > Installing XP will seem to take ages. :-) Trying to run a 32-bit XP on a > 64-bit emulator won't work at all, IIRC. I think it won't even boot. > > Depending on which windows programs you need to run, there is a pre-built > 32-bit Wine for AMD64 available in ports. That might run them faster because > it's not a VM. > > Roland Hmmmmm .... OK, I was/am using 32-bit WinXP, maybe that's part of the problem. I eventually killed this process after 5+ hrs w/ no visible progress & tried again w/ qemu-system-i386 & the rest of the command line args, still (apparently) nogo, killed it after about 1 hr., no visible progress. I never saw *any* GUI pop up in either case. I'm a bit confused here, I thought the qemu executable needed to match the host as much as possible, that's why I tried the x86_64 qemu 1st. I think I am (partly) confused on that point because I have an older qemu (0.13.0-1.fc14) running elsewhere (FC14 64-bit boxen) w/ CentOS 5 & XP VM's which run (mostly) OK. Those installs have a plain qemu executable, as well as about 20 other specifically labeled executables (see below from 1 of the FC14 boxen). I used the plain qemu to build the 2 VM's mentioned previously. The build of qemu-devel built about 2 dozen qemu-system-* executables, does that executable need to match the host or guest OS ? Also, what FreeBSD version were/are you running qemu on ? When you say ages to install XP, is that (many?) hours ? TIA & thx .... [wam@Q6600, ~, 8:17:47am] 1188 % lltr /usr/bin/qemu* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1937400 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-arm* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2612872 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-kvm* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1724072 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-m68k* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1914632 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-system-sparc* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2522920 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 277824 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-img* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1937736 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-sparc64* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 287264 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-io* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2579464 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-system-mips64el* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1644008 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-alpha* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2565672 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-system-mips64* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1613744 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-sh4eb* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1753448 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-system-sh4eb* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2828680 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-system-ppc* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2449576 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-ppc* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2770408 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-ppc64abi32* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1753448 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-system-sh4* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 266976 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-nbd* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 3179272 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-system-ppc64* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1574000 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-cris* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1961872 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-mipsel* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1938720 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-armeb* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2478600 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-system-mips* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1609640 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-sh4* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1783784 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-system-m68k* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2770240 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-ppc64* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1956480 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-x86_64* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2829000 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-system-ppcemb* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1739424 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-sparc* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2455640 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1932816 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-sparc32plus* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2821752 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-system-arm* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1963208 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-mips* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1919656 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-i386* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2474504 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-system-mipsel* -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1665648 Oct 19 2010 /usr/bin/qemu-system-cris* [wam@Q6600, ~, 8:17:52am] 1189 % file /usr/bin/qemu /usr/bin/qemu: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, stripped [wam@Q6600, ~, 8:17:58am] 1190 % file /usr/bin/qemu-x86_64 /usr/bin/qemu-x86_64: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, stripped [wam@Q6600, ~, 8:18:02am] 1191 % file /usr/bin/qemu-i386 /usr/bin/qemu-i386: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, stripped [wam@Q6600, ~, 8:18:06am] 1192 % file /usr/bin/qemu-sparc /usr/bin/qemu-sparc: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.32, stripped [wam@Q6600, ~, 8:18:10am] 1193 % -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 14:23:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19793E7 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBBCAA8F for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:23:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-152.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0SENtkM005899 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:23:55 -0600 Message-ID: <54C8F271.8060101@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:30:09 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> <54C862ED.6050704@hiwaay.net> <20150128100121.2cca4524@curlew.lan> In-Reply-To: <20150128100121.2cca4524@curlew.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:23:57 -0000 On 01/28/15 04:01, Mike Clarke wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 22:17:49 -0600 > "William A. Mahaffey III" wrote: > >> Is anyone onlist successfully using qemu-devel 2.2.0 under >> FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5 w/ windoze VM's > It's a long time since I tried qemu. I'm running Virtualbox > (emulators/virtualbox-ose) instead and Windows XP runs fine with it. For > best results you need to install virtualbox guest additions for Windows > on the guest system. > I tried virtualbox some months ago & had serious problems (crashed the system w/ file-system corruption). I suspect pilot error, so I posted about that & was referred to a virtualbox list @ Oracle (or whoever maintains v-box). I tried to subscribe & it never replied. I was using V4.3.10-ish at that time, it's up to 4.3.20 now. I gave up back then due to the crashes. I am AOK w/ virtualbox if it (now) works. What version of it (v-box) & FreeBSD are you using ? TIA & thx for the reply :-) .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 14:40:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DACA17D0 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avasout07.plus.net (avasout07.plus.net [84.93.230.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F4D7C1D for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:40:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout07 with smtp id lSft1p003516WCc01Sfuj6; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:39:54 +0000 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=TqhohVnh c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=YNv0rlydsVwA:10 a=R_4_8qS_AAAA:8 a=zAhxFCxdJifFIdr3YoUA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=stVXZ9mVMoUA:10 a=_sbC5OyzlvYA:10 a=xbzPfEbfWBYA:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YGTma-0001b2-Ob for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:39:53 +0000 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:39:52 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20150128143952.064ecfbe@curlew.lan> In-Reply-To: <54C8F271.8060101@hiwaay.net> References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> <54C862ED.6050704@hiwaay.net> <20150128100121.2cca4524@curlew.lan> <54C8F271.8060101@hiwaay.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mike@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:40:03 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:30:09 -0600 "William A. Mahaffey III" wrote: > I am AOK w/ virtualbox if it (now) works. What version > of it (v-box) & FreeBSD are you using ? TIA & thx for the reply :-) . curlew:/etc% freebsd-version -ku 10.1-RELEASE-p5 10.1-RELEASE-p5 curlew:/etc% pkg info -x virtualbox virtualbox-ose-4.3.20_4 virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.3.20 It also ran OK on 9.1-RELEASE before upgrading to 10 -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 14:46:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFBE5908 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86971CFE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0SEkcaa002772 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:46:38 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t0SEkbCM002769; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:46:37 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:46:37 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Scott Bennett Subject: Re: buildworld, buildkernel, and devel/cache In-Reply-To: <201501280735.t0S7ZqRD021239@sdf.org> Message-ID: References: <201501261245.t0QCjUMD009768@sdf.org> <201501261843.t0QIhX78006200@sdf.org> <201501271240.t0RCe9GA006605@sdf.org> <201501280735.t0S7ZqRD021239@sdf.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:46:38 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:46:46 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Scott Bennett wrote: > Warren Block wrote: >> >> In /etc/make.conf, I added this: >> >> .if (!empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/src*) || !empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/obj*)) > > Huh. The above line is not present in the installed > /usr/local/share/doc/ccache/ccache-howto-freebsd.txt file on my system. Maybe > I should reinstall devel/ccache to see if an updated, corrected version > appears? The port has the DOCS option disabled by default. I left it like that, then couldn't find the installed file, and used the temporary version in the port directory: work/ccache-howto-freebsd.txt >> .if !defined(NOCCACHE) && exists(/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc) > > In the line above, everything before the "&&" is missing in the doc file. Maybe you have an old version of the text file from a previous installation, and the port is not installing a new one because of the DOCS default setting. >>> And thanks, Walter, for your attention to this. >> >> You're welcome, Steve. :) > > Oh, good grief! I apologize most profusely for the typo, Warren. I don't > know why I typed that, but will chalk it up to yet another of my infamous > posting-hours-past-my-bedtime brain farts. Sigh. :-( Not a problem, I thought it was funny. :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 15:06:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15DA990 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.cyberleo.net (paka.cyberleo.net [216.226.128.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADE5F17 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.44.4] (vitani.den.cyberleo.net [216.80.73.130]) by mail.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EEB3C17429; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:06:50 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <54C8FB09.5030305@cyberleo.net> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:06:49 -0600 From: CyberLeo Kitsana User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "William A. Mahaffey III" , "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> <20150128071441.GA29698@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C8EFF3.6050803@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <54C8EFF3.6050803@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:06:59 -0000 On 01/28/2015 08:19 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 01/28/15 01:14, Roland Smith wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 07:18:06PM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>> On 01/27/15 15:04, Roland Smith wrote: >>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:08:58AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III >>>> wrote: >>>>> .... FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5, qemu-0.11.1_18, >>>>> kqemu-kmod-1.3.0.p11_12 ? I >>>>> have tried w/ kqemu loaded & unloaded (recommended online), w/ >>>>> -nographic, w/ -vga std, etc. No love. All I want to do is run a WinXP >>>>> 32bit VM &/or a 64-bit Win7 VM from my desktop (xfce-4.10_7, >>>>> xorg-7.7_1, >>>>> xf86-video-vesa-2.3.3_5) :-/ .... Several online sites imply that it >>>>> works OK, 1 specifically w/ FreeBSD 9 no less. Any clues appreciated, >>>>> any more info gladly provided .... >>>> This version is *ancient*. I would suggest trying qemu-devel >>>> instead, because >>>> that provides qemu-2.2.0. Last time I tried it 0.11 with or without >>>> qkemu >>>> crashed a lot. >>>> >>>> According to the website, qemu version 0.11 and up do not support kqemu >>>> anymore (see http://wiki.qemu.org/KQEMU), so you don't need that >>>> anymore. >>>> >>>> In time (and if your processor is new enough to have extended page >>>> tables) I >>>> guess qemu on FreeBSD could be replaced by the bhyve hypervisor that >>>> is now in >>>> 10.x and is being developed further in HEAD. Currently bhyve can >>>> load FreeBSD, >>>> OpenBSD, NetBSD and Linux guests. Support to run windoze as a guest >>>> will come >>>> in the future. >>>> >>>> Roland >>> OK, I have qemu-devel compiled & installed, kqemu unloaded from the >>> kernel, & (hopefully) a build of a VM underway, command-line: qemu >>> -cdrom ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon >>> -vga std -nographic -no-acpi -localtime, w/ qemu softlinked to >>> qemu-system-x86_64 in /usr/local/bin. How long is this expected to take >>> :-) ? TIA & thx for everything so far .... >> If you are using a 64-bit build of XP the GUI should come up pretty fast. >> Installing XP will seem to take ages. :-) Trying to run a 32-bit XP on a >> 64-bit emulator won't work at all, IIRC. I think it won't even boot. >> >> Depending on which windows programs you need to run, there is a pre-built >> 32-bit Wine for AMD64 available in ports. That might run them faster >> because >> it's not a VM. >> >> Roland > > Hmmmmm .... OK, I was/am using 32-bit WinXP, maybe that's part of the > problem. I eventually killed this process after 5+ hrs w/ no visible > progress & tried again w/ qemu-system-i386 & the rest of the command > line args, still (apparently) nogo, killed it after about 1 hr., no > visible progress. I never saw *any* GUI pop up in either case. What, precisely, are you expecting to witness while running the Windows XP install ISO? To my knowledge, it does not support anything but GUI installation, and it looks like you have turned off graphics output using the -nographic flag. > I'm a bit > confused here, I thought the qemu executable needed to match the host as > much as possible, that's why I tried the x86_64 qemu 1st. The qemu executable you use is the one you want the guest to emulate, not the one that matches your host. qemu-system-x86_64 will emulate a 64-bit Intel/AMD system; qemu-system-i386 will emulate a 32-bit Intel/AMD system; qemu-system-mips will emulate a MIPS-architecture system. All will run on the host upon which they were built. -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Technical Administrator CyberLeo.Net Webhosting http://www.CyberLeo.Net Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 15:59:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BE151C1 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:59:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nk11p03mm-asmtp001.mac.com (nk11p03mm-asmtpout001.mac.com [17.158.232.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 533FC75E for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:59:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.10] (54691C68.cm-12-2a.dynamic.ziggo.nl [84.105.28.104]) by nk11p03mm-asmtp001.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.35.0 64bit (built Dec 4 2014)) with ESMTPSA id <0NIW00IGX9Q8VK00@nk11p03mm-asmtp001.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:58:59 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.13.68,1.0.33,0.0.0000 definitions=2015-01-28_02:2015-01-28,2015-01-28,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1412080000 definitions=main-1501280162 From: Joseph Kakisina Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Subject: trying to install FreeBSD 10.0 CD in a PowerPC G5 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:58:56 +0100 Message-id: <354D648A-9EE2-455C-821A-6FB75283DB4D@icloud.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Cc: Joseph Kakisina X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:59:10 -0000 Dear sir, I=E2=80=99ve purchased the FreeBSD 10.0 insulation CD=E2=80=99s and want = to install FreeBSD on my =E2=80=98old=E2=80=99 PowerPC G5. After starting up with cmd-option O-F I typed the command boot cd:,\ppc\chrp\loader cd:0 and hit return the system appends load-size=3D0 adler32=3D1 so I see on the screen boot cd:,\ppc\chrp\loader cd:0 load-size=3D0 adler32=3D1 I got the error message LOAD-SIZE is too small What should I do to fix this error ? Kind regards, Joseph Kakisina= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 16:08:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4783533E for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:08:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10A9B85A for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-152.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.152]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0SG7wdF015286 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:07:59 -0600 Message-ID: <54C90AD5.9090807@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:14:13 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> <20150128071441.GA29698@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C8EFF3.6050803@hiwaay.net> <54C8FB09.5030305@cyberleo.net> In-Reply-To: <54C8FB09.5030305@cyberleo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:08:01 -0000 On 01/28/15 09:06, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote: > On 01/28/2015 08:19 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> On 01/28/15 01:14, Roland Smith wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 07:18:06PM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>>> On 01/27/15 15:04, Roland Smith wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:08:58AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> .... FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5, qemu-0.11.1_18, >>>>>> kqemu-kmod-1.3.0.p11_12 ? I >>>>>> have tried w/ kqemu loaded & unloaded (recommended online), w/ >>>>>> -nographic, w/ -vga std, etc. No love. All I want to do is run a WinXP >>>>>> 32bit VM &/or a 64-bit Win7 VM from my desktop (xfce-4.10_7, >>>>>> xorg-7.7_1, >>>>>> xf86-video-vesa-2.3.3_5) :-/ .... Several online sites imply that it >>>>>> works OK, 1 specifically w/ FreeBSD 9 no less. Any clues appreciated, >>>>>> any more info gladly provided .... >>>>> This version is *ancient*. I would suggest trying qemu-devel >>>>> instead, because >>>>> that provides qemu-2.2.0. Last time I tried it 0.11 with or without >>>>> qkemu >>>>> crashed a lot. >>>>> >>>>> According to the website, qemu version 0.11 and up do not support kqemu >>>>> anymore (see http://wiki.qemu.org/KQEMU), so you don't need that >>>>> anymore. >>>>> >>>>> In time (and if your processor is new enough to have extended page >>>>> tables) I >>>>> guess qemu on FreeBSD could be replaced by the bhyve hypervisor that >>>>> is now in >>>>> 10.x and is being developed further in HEAD. Currently bhyve can >>>>> load FreeBSD, >>>>> OpenBSD, NetBSD and Linux guests. Support to run windoze as a guest >>>>> will come >>>>> in the future. >>>>> >>>>> Roland >>>> OK, I have qemu-devel compiled & installed, kqemu unloaded from the >>>> kernel, & (hopefully) a build of a VM underway, command-line: qemu >>>> -cdrom ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon >>>> -vga std -nographic -no-acpi -localtime, w/ qemu softlinked to >>>> qemu-system-x86_64 in /usr/local/bin. How long is this expected to take >>>> :-) ? TIA & thx for everything so far .... >>> If you are using a 64-bit build of XP the GUI should come up pretty fast. >>> Installing XP will seem to take ages. :-) Trying to run a 32-bit XP on a >>> 64-bit emulator won't work at all, IIRC. I think it won't even boot. >>> >>> Depending on which windows programs you need to run, there is a pre-built >>> 32-bit Wine for AMD64 available in ports. That might run them faster >>> because >>> it's not a VM. >>> >>> Roland >> Hmmmmm .... OK, I was/am using 32-bit WinXP, maybe that's part of the >> problem. I eventually killed this process after 5+ hrs w/ no visible >> progress & tried again w/ qemu-system-i386 & the rest of the command >> line args, still (apparently) nogo, killed it after about 1 hr., no >> visible progress. I never saw *any* GUI pop up in either case. > What, precisely, are you expecting to witness while running the Windows > XP install ISO? To my knowledge, it does not support anything but GUI > installation, and it looks like you have turned off graphics output > using the -nographic flag. I know, when I ran it w/o the -nographics flag, it left the rxvt terminal in a fubared state when I killed it using killall from another terminal window :-/. I did notice that if I killed it w/ a ctrl-C from the terminal it was running in, the terminal was not fubared. I guess I'll try again w/ graphics, & the i386 qemu .... >> I'm a bit >> confused here, I thought the qemu executable needed to match the host as >> much as possible, that's why I tried the x86_64 qemu 1st. > The qemu executable you use is the one you want the guest to emulate, > not the one that matches your host. qemu-system-x86_64 will emulate a > 64-bit Intel/AMD system; qemu-system-i386 will emulate a 32-bit > Intel/AMD system; qemu-system-mips will emulate a MIPS-architecture > system. All will run on the host upon which they were built. Thanks, I was confused about that due to past experience under Linux, where there was an amorphous qemu executable that apparently executed the correct system-specific emulator in turn. Thanks for the clarification. -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 16:24:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B104C7A9 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7937AA36 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-72.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0SGO1CD027392 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:24:02 -0600 Message-ID: <54C90E98.3080304@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:30:16 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> <20150128071441.GA29698@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C8EFF3.6050803@hiwaay.net> <54C8FB09.5030305@cyberleo.net> In-Reply-To: <54C8FB09.5030305@cyberleo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 16:24:03 -0000 On 01/28/15 09:06, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote: > On 01/28/2015 08:19 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> On 01/28/15 01:14, Roland Smith wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 07:18:06PM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>>> On 01/27/15 15:04, Roland Smith wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:08:58AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> .... FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5, qemu-0.11.1_18, >>>>>> kqemu-kmod-1.3.0.p11_12 ? I >>>>>> have tried w/ kqemu loaded & unloaded (recommended online), w/ >>>>>> -nographic, w/ -vga std, etc. No love. All I want to do is run a WinXP >>>>>> 32bit VM &/or a 64-bit Win7 VM from my desktop (xfce-4.10_7, >>>>>> xorg-7.7_1, >>>>>> xf86-video-vesa-2.3.3_5) :-/ .... Several online sites imply that it >>>>>> works OK, 1 specifically w/ FreeBSD 9 no less. Any clues appreciated, >>>>>> any more info gladly provided .... >>>>> This version is *ancient*. I would suggest trying qemu-devel >>>>> instead, because >>>>> that provides qemu-2.2.0. Last time I tried it 0.11 with or without >>>>> qkemu >>>>> crashed a lot. >>>>> >>>>> According to the website, qemu version 0.11 and up do not support kqemu >>>>> anymore (see http://wiki.qemu.org/KQEMU), so you don't need that >>>>> anymore. >>>>> >>>>> In time (and if your processor is new enough to have extended page >>>>> tables) I >>>>> guess qemu on FreeBSD could be replaced by the bhyve hypervisor that >>>>> is now in >>>>> 10.x and is being developed further in HEAD. Currently bhyve can >>>>> load FreeBSD, >>>>> OpenBSD, NetBSD and Linux guests. Support to run windoze as a guest >>>>> will come >>>>> in the future. >>>>> >>>>> Roland >>>> OK, I have qemu-devel compiled & installed, kqemu unloaded from the >>>> kernel, & (hopefully) a build of a VM underway, command-line: qemu >>>> -cdrom ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon >>>> -vga std -nographic -no-acpi -localtime, w/ qemu softlinked to >>>> qemu-system-x86_64 in /usr/local/bin. How long is this expected to take >>>> :-) ? TIA & thx for everything so far .... >>> If you are using a 64-bit build of XP the GUI should come up pretty fast. >>> Installing XP will seem to take ages. :-) Trying to run a 32-bit XP on a >>> 64-bit emulator won't work at all, IIRC. I think it won't even boot. >>> >>> Depending on which windows programs you need to run, there is a pre-built >>> 32-bit Wine for AMD64 available in ports. That might run them faster >>> because >>> it's not a VM. >>> >>> Roland >> Hmmmmm .... OK, I was/am using 32-bit WinXP, maybe that's part of the >> problem. I eventually killed this process after 5+ hrs w/ no visible >> progress & tried again w/ qemu-system-i386 & the rest of the command >> line args, still (apparently) nogo, killed it after about 1 hr., no >> visible progress. I never saw *any* GUI pop up in either case. > What, precisely, are you expecting to witness while running the Windows > XP install ISO? To my knowledge, it does not support anything but GUI > installation, and it looks like you have turned off graphics output > using the -nographic flag. > >> I'm a bit >> confused here, I thought the qemu executable needed to match the host as >> much as possible, that's why I tried the x86_64 qemu 1st. > The qemu executable you use is the one you want the guest to emulate, > not the one that matches your host. qemu-system-x86_64 will emulate a > 64-bit Intel/AMD system; qemu-system-i386 will emulate a 32-bit > Intel/AMD system; qemu-system-mips will emulate a MIPS-architecture > system. All will run on the host upon which they were built. > > P.S. to last reply: running the correct qemu w/ graphics is looking more promising: [root@kabini1, WinXP, 8:10:28am] 499 % qemu-system-i386 -cdrom ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon -vga std -no-acpi -localtime (:20221): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:20:09am] 500 % pe TERM=xterm BLOCKSIZE=K MAIL=/var/mail/root PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/root/bin SHELL=/bin/csh HOME=/root USER=root HOSTTYPE=FreeBSD VENDOR=amd OSTYPE=FreeBSD MACHTYPE=x86_64 SHLVL=1 PWD=/home/VMs/qemu/WinXP LOGNAME=root GROUP=wheel HOST=kabini1.local TIME= whew !!!! that took (%U cpu + %S sys) sec., %E elapsed time tot, %P CPU efficiency (%X text, %D data, %M max) KB, (%I+%O) io, %F pfs + %W swaps LC_ALL=C EDITOR=vi PAGER=more [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:20:30am] 501 % setenv DISPLAY ":0.0" [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:21:43am] 502 % pe TERM=xterm BLOCKSIZE=K MAIL=/var/mail/root PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/root/bin SHELL=/bin/csh HOME=/root USER=root HOSTTYPE=FreeBSD VENDOR=amd OSTYPE=FreeBSD MACHTYPE=x86_64 SHLVL=1 PWD=/home/VMs/qemu/WinXP LOGNAME=root GROUP=wheel HOST=kabini1.local TIME= whew !!!! that took (%U cpu + %S sys) sec., %E elapsed time tot, %P CPU efficiency (%X text, %D data, %M max) KB, (%I+%O) io, %F pfs + %W swaps LC_ALL=C EDITOR=vi PAGER=more DISPLAY=:0.0 [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:21:44am] 503 % qemu-system-i386 -cdrom ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon -vga std -no-acpi -localtime Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key (:20227): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0.0 [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:21:48am] 504 % I am logged into root via 'su' from my regular user, rxvt-2.6.4_6 terminal window, system tcsh, xfce-4.10_7 desktop, xorg-server-1.14.7_1,1, FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5 .... The su process doesn't get the graphics environment set correctly for root, I see this a lot :-/ .... What do I need to do to get the GUI to display for me ? TIA & thanks for your reply. -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 19:24:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4672456C for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lb3-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net (lb3-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net [194.109.24.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A72AFF52 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:24:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.home ([83.162.243.5]) by smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net with ESMTP id lXQk1p00F07iGuj01XQl25; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:24:46 +0100 Received: by slackbox.erewhon.home (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E6FD712426; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:24:44 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:24:44 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... Message-ID: <20150128192444.GA31295@slackbox.erewhon.home> Mail-Followup-To: "William A. Mahaffey III" , FreeBSD Questions !!!! References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> <20150128071441.GA29698@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C8EFF3.6050803@hiwaay.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54C8EFF3.6050803@hiwaay.net> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:24:50 -0000 --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 08:19:31AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 01/28/15 01:14, Roland Smith wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 07:18:06PM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> On 01/27/15 15:04, Roland Smith wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:08:58AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wro= te: > >>>> .... FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5, qemu-0.11.1_18, kqemu-kmod-1.3.0.p11_12= ? I > >>>> have tried w/ kqemu loaded & unloaded (recommended online), w/ > >>>> -nographic, w/ -vga std, etc. No love. All I want to do is run a Win= XP > >>>> 32bit VM &/or a 64-bit Win7 VM from my desktop (xfce-4.10_7, xorg-7.= 7_1, > >>>> xf86-video-vesa-2.3.3_5) :-/ .... Several online sites imply that it > >>>> works OK, 1 specifically w/ FreeBSD 9 no less. Any clues appreciated, > >>>> any more info gladly provided .... > >>> This version is *ancient*. I would suggest trying qemu-devel instead,= because > >>> that provides qemu-2.2.0. Last time I tried it 0.11 with or without q= kemu > >>> crashed a lot. > >>> > >>> According to the website, qemu version 0.11 and up do not support kqe= mu > >>> anymore (see http://wiki.qemu.org/KQEMU), so you don't need that anym= ore. > >>> > >>> In time (and if your processor is new enough to have =E2=80=9Cextende= d page tables=E2=80=9D) I > >>> guess qemu on FreeBSD could be replaced by the bhyve hypervisor that = is now in > >>> 10.x and is being developed further in HEAD. Currently bhyve can load= FreeBSD, > >>> OpenBSD, NetBSD and Linux guests. Support to run windoze as a guest w= ill come > >>> in the future. > >>> > >>> Roland > >> OK, I have qemu-devel compiled & installed, kqemu unloaded from the > >> kernel, & (hopefully) a build of a VM underway, command-line: qemu > >> -cdrom ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon > >> -vga std -nographic -no-acpi -localtime, w/ qemu softlinked to If you specify -nographic you won't see *anything*. How are you going to interact with the windows installer that way? :-) Try: qemu-system-i386 -cdrom ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -bo= ot d Booting a windows HD image takes around 90 seconds on my machine. Slackware Linux takes around 120 seconds. Qemu isn't exactly a speed demon... > >> qemu-system-x86_64 in /usr/local/bin. How long is this expected to take > >> :-) ? TIA & thx for everything so far .... > > If you are using a 64-bit build of XP the GUI should come up pretty fas= t. > > Installing XP will seem to take ages. :-) Trying to run a 32-bit XP on a > > 64-bit emulator won't work at all, IIRC. I think it won't even boot. > > > > Depending on which windows programs you need to run, there is a pre-bui= lt > > 32-bit Wine for AMD64 available in ports. That might run them faster be= cause > > it's not a VM. > > > > Roland >=20 > Hmmmmm .... OK, I was/am using 32-bit WinXP, maybe that's part of the=20 > problem. I eventually killed this process after 5+ hrs w/ no visible=20 > progress & tried again w/ qemu-system-i386 & the rest of the command=20 > line args, still (apparently) nogo, killed it after about 1 hr., no=20 > visible progress. I never saw *any* GUI pop up in either case. I'm a bit= =20 > confused here, I thought the qemu executable needed to match the host as= =20 > much as possible, that's why I tried the x86_64 qemu 1st. It should match the *guest*. The postfix after qemu indicates which architecture it is emulating. If you only need an emulator for i386 and x86-64, enable te X86_TARGETS opt= ions. That will skip all the other architectures. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 5753 3324 1661 B0FE 8D93 FCED 40F6 D5DC A38A 33E0 (keyID: A38A33E0) --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJUyTd8AAoJEED21dyjijPgxM8P/iwIbHCtFdSrpd0iArBjXif3 Ll3Y6QhxkTS0lWCJLyTUmSTGSZ/3uxGXKt/UtNu+RMJ3XvsQzSpEhjzYSE0q0pKT hSNXo7SOWbHOt3cdZzCk28trQjElqS0wZI0BNulqeFGyxKhXnebcrK9KTJLnM50j 8R0304mvH8tHMGzZQV4lUxTIJEWc0sV720CqxYwC4KrOKcAP4/xHy8tMEgSjoWb5 lskHRXbGYKDDPELxhkO61IQpAA//ubalG5+0g9fy9TmxFc0plY+LjaTUPMjo9Us8 iA2D9+yAXhFf/CSNVTm0/+LxUfqfNs2zXg2tt1N/fki93SMPyw4+WrJVO9mu7+Sn 7IwFgBGld1Z6CsODF8JYokSIK0QyG6cNl9hhLeb714hbpVstY9Op+780nrRNQSSj qwAUyOLKwXgHzTpR+JM59nt8XnlaNi4hJ/gj560nQW3LRn5kiY1H5RDzBAyVgxYS +nrq2oowtTBwB6HVCZb1dTdepQ3Crrk38ysmgvg60sjuhGqXDebKzle04UsAC1Ol Z/FnGm8BgoeKENUJ6FKDH2Wr02GGN6W2jhiKXwUJPJZJsN4keM5IHBi2hPxC8JOT xemKfFVfhQ6Nd3GAr/+3JmltXkukagOs99zL6kAlIvz23vbgI40t0GJq3qvYXc67 T9hCDWs1qWvyWmZqpI/I =Y8k0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 19:52:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF21B94C for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x22f.google.com (mail-yk0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3E9936E for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 9so9833563ykp.6 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:52:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:organization:mime-version :content-type; bh=80OvtdDSz3y1/+pi2wRf2R7ECDcZSN4V15SxVYl1pxc=; b=H8PG0Vr/ez+/uocb7Bka72vELXGGlWgmGSJPdYMD62oiGACPbATburiEgZDQQzZ53+ uz7TTz7dpyKQyYA1M2WUsa3OqArOglyfC24cl5tnQvE/8Nsex1X96JdPdJZNyE4f0VOR V/NLBFf80aN04nk6DNKbgzXDLMSCgFMxFT710= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :organization:mime-version:content-type; bh=80OvtdDSz3y1/+pi2wRf2R7ECDcZSN4V15SxVYl1pxc=; b=DB2yPBrl8JcHc+iNAetCrEcEvY6Ba8DQcf6VicyQIhl6/0UuhofkWsbjoknBHXHHfd KGR8Z9VYtaIhERZFGOi4CKLY4ztLoYNwDMSd4VCXNnS44kc3ieMLMo5TB25rJv5rr3xy geXbBktmS4ly0EB6D0eBcfS/mlY/vJsU6hz4sGMe4ZiG9B++97jS5ovqIw6bVPbKvULB t/IGl0TXpOd+47aScTaGLmnI0WSS76D0GgWiYl805vF7y5cNUrQbtZCEEeYRpmFYUjW5 0AajutsQPCrINV6h+FcSIMoTdmy4mX9SVw1Tl+8U34oTPs5UmaUUYJeYbJOrMR/09Utc uy2A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkk1DJeNYmJJQsx6ReDW0DXPz7SBXqVqi0v+MRqIRWZY60e+8Ra6jh9apxn85nbMq3IvhvB X-Received: by 10.236.202.173 with SMTP id d33mr1907032yho.184.1422474777592; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:52:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o47sm3134467yhd.48.2015.01.28.11.52.56 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:52:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com [76.182.104.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3kXb882G3fz3DlWj for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:52:56 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:52:47 -0500 From: Jerry To: User questions Subject: Linux "Ghost" Remote Code Execution Vulnerability Message-ID: <20150128145247.5086e9a4@scorpio> Reply-To: User questions Organization: seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/XcfEeRY9E2_v9pX/jQsocY3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:52:59 -0000 --Sig_/XcfEeRY9E2_v9pX/jQsocY3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Does this vulnerability affect FreeBSD? https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/current-activity/2015/01/27/Linux-Ghost-Remote= -Code-Execution-Vulnerability --=20 Jerry --Sig_/XcfEeRY9E2_v9pX/jQsocY3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUyT4PAAoJEElTsHIJnX8efRcH+wTl8H211Ni47wUBdOq8wtso jOmo3Rw2I5lGrXEaKAaEdaYUEdgkC0V+xvurLwmRFiQvVBY6GHW7/WGEDWfMUGY6 bxvypDhOdFTfRV1PxAZK5jnALlcHjIh9vAWTJaANWJbiXOt9Oqw3Gq5tNkj49Nxf HmZ3V5/IiAVlhShnopfj/HBSbLgxzT0ZSs+BsMbqneM/xKioWa95uOBqrgk7mH7t OqG92/oic3r2pNsRItDTCoCjk4pKPoAsCPzGzlqi9BVo8yst7+fYDOn9hzeXX5I6 llRSr/3j9POPj+PPG+tkssdC2/zEVH5XcWYm/vV/a7JAWGv1GJEKaIsTL84Qj0w= =Qt3X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/XcfEeRY9E2_v9pX/jQsocY3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 20:19:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 969F6705 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D96789E for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-84.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.84]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0SKJO3d018727 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:19:25 -0600 Message-ID: <54C945C3.3070607@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:25:39 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> <20150128071441.GA29698@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C8EFF3.6050803@hiwaay.net> <20150128192444.GA31295@slackbox.erewhon.home> In-Reply-To: <20150128192444.GA31295@slackbox.erewhon.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:19:32 -0000 On 01/28/15 13:24, Roland Smith wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 08:19:31AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> On 01/28/15 01:14, Roland Smith wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 07:18:06PM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>>> On 01/27/15 15:04, Roland Smith wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:08:58AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>>>>> .... FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5, qemu-0.11.1_18, kqemu-kmod-1.3.0.p11_12 ? I >>>>>> have tried w/ kqemu loaded & unloaded (recommended online), w/ >>>>>> -nographic, w/ -vga std, etc. No love. All I want to do is run a WinXP >>>>>> 32bit VM &/or a 64-bit Win7 VM from my desktop (xfce-4.10_7, xorg-7.7_1, >>>>>> xf86-video-vesa-2.3.3_5) :-/ .... Several online sites imply that it >>>>>> works OK, 1 specifically w/ FreeBSD 9 no less. Any clues appreciated, >>>>>> any more info gladly provided .... >>>>> This version is *ancient*. I would suggest trying qemu-devel instead, because >>>>> that provides qemu-2.2.0. Last time I tried it 0.11 with or without qkemu >>>>> crashed a lot. >>>>> >>>>> According to the website, qemu version 0.11 and up do not support kqemu >>>>> anymore (see http://wiki.qemu.org/KQEMU), so you don't need that anymore. >>>>> >>>>> In time (and if your processor is new enough to have “extended page tables”) I >>>>> guess qemu on FreeBSD could be replaced by the bhyve hypervisor that is now in >>>>> 10.x and is being developed further in HEAD. Currently bhyve can load FreeBSD, >>>>> OpenBSD, NetBSD and Linux guests. Support to run windoze as a guest will come >>>>> in the future. >>>>> >>>>> Roland >>>> OK, I have qemu-devel compiled & installed, kqemu unloaded from the >>>> kernel, & (hopefully) a build of a VM underway, command-line: qemu >>>> -cdrom ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon >>>> -vga std -nographic -no-acpi -localtime, w/ qemu softlinked to > If you specify -nographic you won't see *anything*. How are you going to > interact with the windows installer that way? :-) > > Try: > > qemu-system-i386 -cdrom ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d > > Booting a windows HD image takes around 90 seconds on my machine. Slackware > Linux takes around 120 seconds. Qemu isn't exactly a speed demon... I tried this (plus -noacpi -localtime) & got X11 errors: [root@kabini1, WinXP, 8:10:28am] 499 % qemu-system-i386 -cdrom ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon -vga std -no-acpi -localtime (:20221): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:20:09am] 500 % pe TERM=xterm BLOCKSIZE=K MAIL=/var/mail/root PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/root/bin SHELL=/bin/csh HOME=/root USER=root HOSTTYPE=FreeBSD VENDOR=amd OSTYPE=FreeBSD MACHTYPE=x86_64 SHLVL=1 PWD=/home/VMs/qemu/WinXP LOGNAME=root GROUP=wheel HOST=kabini1.local TIME= whew !!!! that took (%U cpu + %S sys) sec., %E elapsed time tot, %P CPU efficiency (%X text, %D data, %M max) KB, (%I+%O) io, %F pfs + %W swaps LC_ALL=C EDITOR=vi PAGER=more [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:20:30am] 501 % setenv DISPLAY ":0.0" [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:21:43am] 502 % pe TERM=xterm BLOCKSIZE=K MAIL=/var/mail/root PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/root/bin SHELL=/bin/csh HOME=/root USER=root HOSTTYPE=FreeBSD VENDOR=amd OSTYPE=FreeBSD MACHTYPE=x86_64 SHLVL=1 PWD=/home/VMs/qemu/WinXP LOGNAME=root GROUP=wheel HOST=kabini1.local TIME= whew !!!! that took (%U cpu + %S sys) sec., %E elapsed time tot, %P CPU efficiency (%X text, %D data, %M max) KB, (%I+%O) io, %F pfs + %W swaps LC_ALL=C EDITOR=vi PAGER=more DISPLAY=:0.0 [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:21:44am] 503 % qemu-system-i386 -cdrom ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon -vga std -no-acpi -localtime Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key (:20227): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0.0 [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:21:48am] 504 % I have had this problem before, when I 'su' to root (usually from an rxvt terminal running csh as a regular user), the environment isn't set up correctly for most X11 stuff to work correctly when invoked from that root CLI. I have posted about this before, but it still persists. Any clue how to get this to work for me :-) ? TIA & thanks for your reply. > >>>> qemu-system-x86_64 in /usr/local/bin. How long is this expected to take >>>> :-) ? TIA & thx for everything so far .... >>> If you are using a 64-bit build of XP the GUI should come up pretty fast. >>> Installing XP will seem to take ages. :-) Trying to run a 32-bit XP on a >>> 64-bit emulator won't work at all, IIRC. I think it won't even boot. >>> >>> Depending on which windows programs you need to run, there is a pre-built >>> 32-bit Wine for AMD64 available in ports. That might run them faster because >>> it's not a VM. >>> >>> Roland >> Hmmmmm .... OK, I was/am using 32-bit WinXP, maybe that's part of the >> problem. I eventually killed this process after 5+ hrs w/ no visible >> progress & tried again w/ qemu-system-i386 & the rest of the command >> line args, still (apparently) nogo, killed it after about 1 hr., no >> visible progress. I never saw *any* GUI pop up in either case. I'm a bit >> confused here, I thought the qemu executable needed to match the host as >> much as possible, that's why I tried the x86_64 qemu 1st. > It should match the *guest*. The postfix after qemu indicates which > architecture it is emulating. > > If you only need an emulator for i386 and x86-64, enable te X86_TARGETS options. > That will skip all the other architectures. > > > Roland Thanks, I eventually figured that out, we'll see what happens next .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 20:24:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB517950 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:24:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x233.google.com (mail-pa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B6F6978 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:24:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id fb1so29337305pad.10 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 12:24:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=fNCLynYs8rfH+uVMlhu4iV0UBaSkTm66B833991i/q8=; b=sSoOaE19V2MsM094JdpScqOgfg3FMSsfNDSwXtdSxcxBsC4JZGHzwL85YzTQaFPG7X erbNsJPBkiKbIishXunwFEsDPolwuJ8zkgDs/z7pBdGJgNa3V9XpqWXy1Srq71hILhTR D5RAPPiqiBoXVpb/DFyAIhHMygVUdDlSzOFoGzqcGITG3zStVuX9SztYwWSxzgRy0Dz6 2iPowShYfz26i3Lfym02tuZMIuQa7O8UixZMdBewqA7o8nSXLFyVznJX9HI6ZC/mEXwQ NSlfcMPw+KoWRCNcutB8KyZoiyOcAkvPEQ0kp32Jkz8LL7v5cDijAr+uclHKFd5hbdhW Qqjg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.70.45.17 with SMTP id i17mr8775797pdm.13.1422476685111; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 12:24:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.101.133 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 12:24:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150128145247.5086e9a4@scorpio> References: <20150128145247.5086e9a4@scorpio> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:24:45 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Linux "Ghost" Remote Code Execution Vulnerability From: Adam Vande More To: User questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:24:45 -0000 On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Jerry wrote: > Does this vulnerability affect FreeBSD? > > > https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/current-activity/2015/01/27/Linux-Ghost-Remote-Code-Execution-Vulnerability > Probably the linuxulator. -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 20:35:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8918C17 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.52.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7FFAC6 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id 14ADDCB8CA0; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:35:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from 128.135.70.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:35:08 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <56822.128.135.70.2.1422477308.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:35:08 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Linux "Ghost" Remote Code Execution Vulnerability From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "Adam Vande More" Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal References: <20150128145247.5086e9a4@scorpio> In-Reply-To: Cc: User questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:35:15 -0000 On Wed, January 28, 2015 2:24 pm, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Jerry wrote: > >> Does this vulnerability affect FreeBSD? >> https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/current-activity/2015/01/27/Linux-Ghost-Remote-Code-Execution-Vulnerability This is glibc gethostbyname: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/01/27/9 FreeBSD doesn't use glibc in base system (as far as I know). And I do not see glibc in ports... Valeri > > Probably the linuxulator. > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 19:59:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D365EF05; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:59:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fallback2.mail.ru (fallback2.mail.ru [94.100.179.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706183E7; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:59:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from f420.i.mail.ru (f420.i.mail.ru [185.5.136.91]) by fallback2.mail.ru (mPOP.Fallback_MX) with ESMTP id 0938851DFE56; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:34:35 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mail.ru; s=mail2; h=Content-Type:Message-ID:Reply-To:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:From; bh=f/XONwWSzxHDhWhYR1PtwlUc01X57srY9aLcqqCVZSY=; b=vG2IYcARKiyJrAeX3zZ+L8GkruQkDIEiViHM9ALq/GjSGeMAkYM8lei1H3F6ujLIdcxN/+b62SBz6VXTJuIkZHQT5GEKyqognBQjeUE5NX2dJqjxFACxUkmTuU7e0MsGI5JWiPaYGPwdQIg2847Pq86DWyURPlD8rUJOAnh0Rlc=; Received: from [2.89.204.82] (ident=mail) by f420.i.mail.ru with local (envelope-from ) id 1YGYNe-0004H7-KD; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:34:26 +0300 Received: from [2.89.204.82] by e.mail.ru with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:34:26 +0300 From: =?UTF-8?B?0JjQstCw0L0g0J/RkdGC0YA=?= To: freebsd-drivers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?cnRsaW5rIGRyaXZlciBzdXBwb3J0?= MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mail.Ru Mailer 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [2.89.204.82] Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:34:26 +0300 Reply-To: =?UTF-8?B?0JjQstCw0L0g0J/RkdGC0YA=?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1422473666.923685249@f420.i.mail.ru> X-Mras: Ok X-Spam: undefined X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:10:39 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:59:22 -0000 IERlYXIgU2lyL01hZGFtLAoKV2hlbiB3aWxsIEZyZWVCU0Qgc3VwcG9ydHMgUlQzMjkwIFdpcmVs ZXNzIGRyaXZlcj8KCgpCZXN0IHJlZ2FyZHMsCkl2YW4gUGV0ZXJzLgo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 21:15:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 996DBC45 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avasout07.plus.net (avasout07.plus.net [84.93.230.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B7FAFB2 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([84.92.153.232]) by avasout07 with smtp id lZF61p00B516WCc01ZF7mH; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:15:07 +0000 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=TqhohVnh c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:117 a=lfSX4pPLp9EkufIcToJk/A==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=YNv0rlydsVwA:10 a=AfEfcmvjAAAA:8 a=eu7-mJZ4AAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=wIoS1S5q7mizDJT0D1gA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=QS-zhIznbEYA:10 a=bJEULNVhwhEA:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1YGZx0-0000vp-Ip for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:15:06 +0000 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:15:02 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20150128211502.265ec2e0@curlew.lan> In-Reply-To: <20150128145247.5086e9a4@scorpio> References: <20150128145247.5086e9a4@scorpio> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: mike@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Re: Linux "Ghost" Remote Code Execution Vulnerability Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:15:12 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:52:47 -0500 Jerry wrote: > Does this vulnerability affect FreeBSD? > > https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/current-activity/2015/01/27/Linux-Ghost-Remote-Code-Execution-Vulnerability Yes, this morning pkg audit returned this: linux_base-c6-6.6_1 is vulnerable: glibc -- gethostbyname buffer overflow CVE: CVE-2015-0235 WWW: http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/0765de84-a6c1-11e4-a0c1-c485083ca99c.html But 6.6_2 which uses a GHOST-free version of glibc was committed to ports earlier today. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 21:27:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 539B530E for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:27:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.bqwireless.com (mail.bqwireless.com [81.4.127.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BE01E3 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:16:43 +0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jack Eriksen Subject: Interested in a cooperation X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 21:27:18 -0000 Dear webmaster, My name is Jack and I found http://docs.freebsd.org/ while browsing. I would like to offer you an interesting cooperation in which we can exchange links or articles or even banners. As you probably already know, with exchanging links we can improve our Google ranking and receive more visitors to our site. I have a selection of high quality websites that are very related to yours and I am able to give you a link from them in exchange for a link from you site. Let me know if you are interested and I will send you more information. Thanks, Jack Eriksen http://www.bqwireless.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 22:03:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3882E860 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (smtp10.hushmail.com [65.39.178.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EB699A8 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A70A4C0135 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:02:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w3.hushmail.com [65.39.178.62]) by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:02:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 70690C0392; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:02:58 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:02:58 +0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: PF: Why is FreeBSD using an ancient version of PF? From: opendaddy@hushmail.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150128220258.70690C0392@smtp.hushmail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:03:05 -0000 Hello, Are there any plans to update FreeBSD's version of PF? That way one wouldn't have to maintain a separate rules for FreeBSD's ancient PF syntax. Many thanks! O.D. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 22:22:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60A64BB7 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (smtp10.hushmail.com [65.39.178.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46CE1BC8 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:22:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp10.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FF77C02EE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w3.hushmail.com [65.39.178.62]) by smtp10.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:22:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 4E9C4C03CC; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:22:28 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:22:28 +0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: spamd: greyreader failed (No such file or directory) From: opendaddy@hushmail.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150128222228.4E9C4C03CC@smtp.hushmail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:22:29 -0000 Hello, Trying to set up spamd (http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/spamd.html): rc.conf pf_enable="YES" obspamd_enable="YES" obspamlogd_enable="YES" I added `fdescfs /dev/fd fdescfs rw 0 0` to `/etc/fstab`, ran `mount -a`, `cd /usr/local/etc/spamd && cp spamd.conf.example spamd.conf` and then `/usr/local/etc/rc.d/obspamd start`, but `/var/log/messages` reports: `spamd: greyreader failed (No such file or directory)`. I came across https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/spamd-spam-trapping-crashes.11388/ but with no solution. Anybody have any ideas? Many thanks! O.D. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 22:41:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0202DFFE for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:41:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3204D2E for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id rd3so30583239pab.3 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:41:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=C6HdliiYoiz6WmnKSdIaYBWHQ9ml4s2nOgbCTCDkUik=; b=OCXIxp/4C/QUNxu4/1xmiXmHg4ApYLMDt5uHI3kjFC5dcwyOWmKu+rA/2U2MlV5yE8 z9e1aVuJvWDFXEg3KpnIbJ4Ml1vXA2zWWv2ygmPpliyg4iN1d523j53ET1YGBE6LXdpB SApwl/L2PO6hwtuf6VlAM8IsY1uFNuVWc5JQCupprGTWnwgicJ6o/kWIKPLlPodR2+6a PzfNbtw842VoDZco+9jLzxYQmfnrXWwVPOS25oC+XDJvERouQJsTiJi7FXCIaVuoUhg6 +tab08k+Ord29aVleGxF0pR8FIsWoEyByL/ARZLk1bZyOBTuOu3RZmrqpwIk2ICYf826 TGTA== X-Received: by 10.70.126.68 with SMTP id mw4mr9496028pdb.106.1422484860339; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:41:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.113.113] ([120.29.76.243]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w3sm5765081pbs.11.2015.01.28.14.40.58 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:40:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54C9657A.7090908@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 06:40:58 +0800 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: opendaddy@hushmail.com Subject: Re: PF: Why is FreeBSD using an ancient version of PF? References: <20150128220258.70690C0392@smtp.hushmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20150128220258.70690C0392@smtp.hushmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:41:01 -0000 opendaddy@hushmail.com wrote: > Hello, > > Are there any plans to update FreeBSD's version of PF? That way one wouldn't have to maintain a separate rules for FreeBSD's ancient PF syntax. > > Many thanks! > > O.D. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > This has been discussed many times. Check the archives for your answer. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 22:48:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C4EA51D for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter01.peakinternet.com (filter01.peakinternet.com [207.55.16.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0913E20 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmail-mta01.peak.org ([207.55.16.111]) by filter01.peakinternet.com ({e1c81c21-e4c4-4528-aa90-7a27869c545a}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTPS id 20150128224413224 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:44:13 +0000 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: Received: from zmail-mta01.peak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmail-mta01.peak.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B2DDC4C01 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:44:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zmail-mta01.peak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE7DF631D for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:44:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from zmail-mta01.peak.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zmail-mta01.peak.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 1q8MUBQ91tkM for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:44:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailproxy-lb-05.peak.org (mailproxy-lb-05.peak.org [207.55.17.95]) by zmail-mta01.peak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A4FC4C01 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:44:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from carlj by elk.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YGbLH-0004gy-0x for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:44:11 -0800 From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> <20150128071441.GA29698@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C8EFF3.6050803@hiwaay.net> <20150128192444.GA31295@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C945C3.3070607@hiwaay.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:44:10 -0800 In-Reply-To: <54C945C3.3070607@hiwaay.net> (William A. Mahaffey, III's message of "Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:25:39 -0600") Message-ID: <871tme34qt.fsf@elk.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-MAG-OUTBOUND: peakinternet.redcondor.net@207.55.16/22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:48:25 -0000 "William A. Mahaffey III" writes: > DISPLAY=:0.0 > [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:21:44am] 503 % qemu-system-i386 -cdrom > ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon -vga > std -no-acpi -localtime > Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key > (:20227): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0.0 > [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:21:48am] 504 % > > > I have had this problem before, when I 'su' to root (usually from an > rxvt terminal running csh as a regular user), the environment isn't > set up correctly for most X11 stuff to work correctly when invoked > from that root CLI. I have posted about this before, but it still > persists. Any clue how to get this to work for me :-) ? TIA & thanks > for your reply. I don't usually run X11 apps as root, but I have ~/.Xauthority for root symbolic linked to ~/.Xauthority for the user that is running X11. I just tested with xclock and root can run that properly. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 28 23:15:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FFA8F38 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 23:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com (smtp5.hushmail.com [65.39.178.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "Self-signed" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14AF319D for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 23:15:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp5.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 286086022C for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w3.hushmail.com [65.39.178.62]) by smtp5.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:42:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99) id 03BB7C0376; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:42:34 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:42:34 +0000 To: "Ernie Luzar" Subject: Re: PF: Why is FreeBSD using an ancient version of PF? From: opendaddy@hushmail.com In-Reply-To: <54C9657A.7090908@gmail.com> References: <20150128220258.70690C0392@smtp.hushmail.com> <54C9657A.7090908@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-Id: <20150128224235.03BB7C0376@smtp.hushmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 23:15:46 -0000 On 28. januar 2015 at 10:33 PM, "Ernie Luzar" wrote: > >This has been discussed many times. Check the archives for your >answer. Cool, thanks. O.D. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 00:07:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD14EEDD for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:07:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 758C98C7 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:07:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-100.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0T07WZo032068 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:07:33 -0600 Message-ID: <54C97B3B.7030003@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:13:47 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> <20150128071441.GA29698@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C8EFF3.6050803@hiwaay.net> <20150128192444.GA31295@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C945C3.3070607@hiwaay.net> <871tme34qt.fsf@elk.localnet> In-Reply-To: <871tme34qt.fsf@elk.localnet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:07:35 -0000 On 01/28/15 16:44, Carl Johnson wrote: > "William A. Mahaffey III" writes: > > >> DISPLAY=:0.0 >> [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:21:44am] 503 % qemu-system-i386 -cdrom >> ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon -vga >> std -no-acpi -localtime >> Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key >> (:20227): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0.0 >> [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:21:48am] 504 % >> >> >> I have had this problem before, when I 'su' to root (usually from an >> rxvt terminal running csh as a regular user), the environment isn't >> set up correctly for most X11 stuff to work correctly when invoked >> from that root CLI. I have posted about this before, but it still >> persists. Any clue how to get this to work for me :-) ? TIA & thanks >> for your reply. > I don't usually run X11 apps as root, but I have ~/.Xauthority for root > symbolic linked to ~/.Xauthority for the user that is running X11. I > just tested with xclock and root can run that properly. > Thanks for the reply. My /root already has a .Xauthority, should I ditch it ? -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 00:11:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60EA7FA2 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:11:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29DD28F5 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:11:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-19-100.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.19.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0T0BBDV001222 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:11:11 -0600 Message-ID: <54C97C16.30003@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:17:26 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> <20150128071441.GA29698@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C8EFF3.6050803@hiwaay.net> <20150128192444.GA31295@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C945C3.3070607@hiwaay.net> <871tme34qt.fsf@elk.localnet> <54C97B3B.7030003@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <54C97B3B.7030003@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:11:13 -0000 On 01/28/15 18:13, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 01/28/15 16:44, Carl Johnson wrote: >> "William A. Mahaffey III" writes: >> >> >>> DISPLAY=:0.0 >>> [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:21:44am] 503 % qemu-system-i386 -cdrom >>> ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon -vga >>> std -no-acpi -localtime >>> Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key >>> (:20227): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0.0 >>> [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:21:48am] 504 % >>> >>> >>> I have had this problem before, when I 'su' to root (usually from an >>> rxvt terminal running csh as a regular user), the environment isn't >>> set up correctly for most X11 stuff to work correctly when invoked >>> from that root CLI. I have posted about this before, but it still >>> persists. Any clue how to get this to work for me :-) ? TIA & thanks >>> for your reply. >> I don't usually run X11 apps as root, but I have ~/.Xauthority for root >> symbolic linked to ~/.Xauthority for the user that is running X11. I >> just tested with xclock and root can run that properly. >> > > Thanks for the reply. My /root already has a .Xauthority, should I > ditch it ? > Answer: Yes. replacing /root/.Xauthority w/ /home/wam/.Xauthority worked :-) !!!! Hooray !!!! -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 00:17:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 440862E5 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:17:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net (lb1-smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net [194.109.24.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A23149CB for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:17:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.home ([83.162.243.5]) by smtp-cloud2.xs4all.net with ESMTP id lcGg1p00B07iGuj01cGh7R; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 01:16:41 +0100 Received: by slackbox.erewhon.home (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 38594123E6; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 01:16:40 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 01:16:40 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... Message-ID: <20150129001640.GA35821@slackbox.erewhon.home> Mail-Followup-To: "William A. Mahaffey III" , FreeBSD Questions !!!! References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> <20150128071441.GA29698@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C8EFF3.6050803@hiwaay.net> <20150128192444.GA31295@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C945C3.3070607@hiwaay.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54C945C3.3070607@hiwaay.net> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: FreeBSD Questions !!!! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:17:54 -0000 --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 02:25:39PM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 01/28/15 13:24, Roland Smith wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 08:19:31AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> On 01/28/15 01:14, Roland Smith wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 07:18:06PM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wro= te: > >>>> On 01/27/15 15:04, Roland Smith wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:08:58AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III w= rote: > >>>>>> .... FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5, qemu-0.11.1_18, kqemu-kmod-1.3.0.p11_= 12 ? I > >>>>>> have tried w/ kqemu loaded & unloaded (recommended online), w/ > >>>>>> -nographic, w/ -vga std, etc. No love. All I want to do is run a W= inXP > >>>>>> 32bit VM &/or a 64-bit Win7 VM from my desktop (xfce-4.10_7, xorg-= 7.7_1, > >>>>>> xf86-video-vesa-2.3.3_5) :-/ .... Several online sites imply that = it > >>>>>> works OK, 1 specifically w/ FreeBSD 9 no less. Any clues appreciat= ed, > >>>>>> any more info gladly provided .... > >>>>> This version is *ancient*. I would suggest trying qemu-devel instea= d, because > >>>>> that provides qemu-2.2.0. Last time I tried it 0.11 with or without= qkemu > >>>>> crashed a lot. > >>>>> > >>>>> According to the website, qemu version 0.11 and up do not support k= qemu > >>>>> anymore (see http://wiki.qemu.org/KQEMU), so you don't need that an= ymore. > >>>>> > >>>>> In time (and if your processor is new enough to have =E2=80=9Cexten= ded page tables=E2=80=9D) I > >>>>> guess qemu on FreeBSD could be replaced by the bhyve hypervisor tha= t is now in > >>>>> 10.x and is being developed further in HEAD. Currently bhyve can lo= ad FreeBSD, > >>>>> OpenBSD, NetBSD and Linux guests. Support to run windoze as a guest= will come > >>>>> in the future. > >>>>> > >>>>> Roland > >>>> OK, I have qemu-devel compiled & installed, kqemu unloaded from the > >>>> kernel, & (hopefully) a build of a VM underway, command-line: qemu > >>>> -cdrom ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athl= on > >>>> -vga std -nographic -no-acpi -localtime, w/ qemu softlinked to > > If you specify -nographic you won't see *anything*. How are you going to > > interact with the windows installer that way? :-) > > > > Try: > > > > qemu-system-i386 -cdrom ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 25= 6 -boot d > > > > Booting a windows HD image takes around 90 seconds on my machine. Slack= ware > > Linux takes around 120 seconds. Qemu isn't exactly a speed demon... >=20 > I tried this (plus -noacpi -localtime) & got X11 errors: >=20 > [root@kabini1, WinXP, 8:10:28am] 499 % qemu-system-i386 -cdrom=20 > ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon -vga std= =20 > -no-acpi -localtime >=20 > (:20221): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: > I have had this problem before, when I 'su' to root (usually from an=20 > rxvt terminal running csh as a regular user), the environment isn't set= =20 > up correctly for most X11 stuff to work correctly when invoked from that= =20 > root CLI. I have posted about this before, but it still persists. Any=20 > clue how to get this to work for me :-) ? TIA & thanks for your reply. Don't run qemu as root. :-) It is not necessary. As a general principle, anything that doesn't *require* root should be run as a normal user. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 5753 3324 1661 B0FE 8D93 FCED 40F6 D5DC A38A 33E0 (keyID: A38A33E0) --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJUyXvoAAoJEED21dyjijPg8mIP/iGOR3zdFeDTXAO4OVz0YTkW o0zUl8cdKCMP991BBBxFM8utg+Q7dxjyLAt1EjFyIglwt9QirdF5vG+S4z+PImBm RbdLo3LFoB1PyKIma0tkC9HbF2h30Rv6YwdCFoeqaFqzushBVQ9ZdG2NKxRxHsI3 vWhG6Adv1mUvqbqhRuHsSJYzwvdJ3ANaxDpSrd5AsC4ZakvNz6ZtYfV8Ta+TMmA4 Abuol0wdnOeSCHd+AgBmFwA66m4gLksAntY6y8JFh1s3RNNZvwwj6tGKQgXws6SK wDevyGGdLNa+Z9N7zEly4XQhs5Lj+ts9aKWh0rmEyQRhtd6R58Lp2TDa6/umanIT C0EixMYPeQDyhAF051qCtU2kXG/mFKEVkaNY00IDl+W1AvDXyXk4ogj3o31ZZLJ/ jzVuHB7sRAwmkX5DB3Ihj82tTUZXIMau9g0W323/JrNYDYKx6pP1FdRNAJOWnT4w bxtbN5j1XOqEHqoqJyRVaBpBWSBn7cDO9xm5pub7t3TzBpab05lAKBSAAOCRbmEm AsOf9AgX6pszIp9NFpJlsLoDkuXGuDCpcF12a6CVIhrNXTECBx1piNtmrgmTMIQ8 GWIdrYeCPNuWZnOgxViOEHzdjZa70LcryZI0bOKehM1qM+yoV2BQW3I7oyJa3n/A vfGpb2eQR0qVTnMMzVK1 =f4Nq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5vNYLRcllDrimb99-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 01:03:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0150232B for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 01:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD033E9E for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 01:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-174.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.174]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0T139Kj025101 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:03:10 -0600 Message-ID: <54C98844.2030604@hiwaay.net> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:09:24 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> <20150128071441.GA29698@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C8EFF3.6050803@hiwaay.net> <20150128192444.GA31295@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C945C3.3070607@hiwaay.net> <20150129001640.GA35821@slackbox.erewhon.home> In-Reply-To: <20150129001640.GA35821@slackbox.erewhon.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 01:03:12 -0000 On 01/28/15 18:16, Roland Smith wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 02:25:39PM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> On 01/28/15 13:24, Roland Smith wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 08:19:31AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>>> On 01/28/15 01:14, Roland Smith wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 07:18:06PM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>>>>> On 01/27/15 15:04, Roland Smith wrote: >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 11:08:58AM -0600, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>>>>>>> .... FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5, qemu-0.11.1_18, kqemu-kmod-1.3.0.p11_12 ? I >>>>>>>> have tried w/ kqemu loaded & unloaded (recommended online), w/ >>>>>>>> -nographic, w/ -vga std, etc. No love. All I want to do is run a WinXP >>>>>>>> 32bit VM &/or a 64-bit Win7 VM from my desktop (xfce-4.10_7, xorg-7.7_1, >>>>>>>> xf86-video-vesa-2.3.3_5) :-/ .... Several online sites imply that it >>>>>>>> works OK, 1 specifically w/ FreeBSD 9 no less. Any clues appreciated, >>>>>>>> any more info gladly provided .... >>>>>>> This version is *ancient*. I would suggest trying qemu-devel instead, because >>>>>>> that provides qemu-2.2.0. Last time I tried it 0.11 with or without qkemu >>>>>>> crashed a lot. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> According to the website, qemu version 0.11 and up do not support kqemu >>>>>>> anymore (see http://wiki.qemu.org/KQEMU), so you don't need that anymore. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In time (and if your processor is new enough to have “extended page tables”) I >>>>>>> guess qemu on FreeBSD could be replaced by the bhyve hypervisor that is now in >>>>>>> 10.x and is being developed further in HEAD. Currently bhyve can load FreeBSD, >>>>>>> OpenBSD, NetBSD and Linux guests. Support to run windoze as a guest will come >>>>>>> in the future. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Roland >>>>>> OK, I have qemu-devel compiled & installed, kqemu unloaded from the >>>>>> kernel, & (hopefully) a build of a VM underway, command-line: qemu >>>>>> -cdrom ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon >>>>>> -vga std -nographic -no-acpi -localtime, w/ qemu softlinked to >>> If you specify -nographic you won't see *anything*. How are you going to >>> interact with the windows installer that way? :-) >>> >>> Try: >>> >>> qemu-system-i386 -cdrom ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d >>> >>> Booting a windows HD image takes around 90 seconds on my machine. Slackware >>> Linux takes around 120 seconds. Qemu isn't exactly a speed demon... >> I tried this (plus -noacpi -localtime) & got X11 errors: >> >> [root@kabini1, WinXP, 8:10:28am] 499 % qemu-system-i386 -cdrom >> ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon -vga std >> -no-acpi -localtime >> >> (:20221): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: > > >> I have had this problem before, when I 'su' to root (usually from an >> rxvt terminal running csh as a regular user), the environment isn't set >> up correctly for most X11 stuff to work correctly when invoked from that >> root CLI. I have posted about this before, but it still persists. Any >> clue how to get this to work for me :-) ? TIA & thanks for your reply. > Don't run qemu as root. :-) It is not necessary. As a general principle, > anything that doesn't *require* root should be run as a normal user. > > Roland Probably good advice, I didn't think of it in time .... The install is proceeding apace after I copied my $USER/.Xauthority to /root .... I will only be using those VM's as $USER, not root .... If all finishes up well, I may redo it as $USER .... Thanks. -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 02:38:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75F53FD9 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 02:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35E95BC2 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 02:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-61-84.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.61.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 904A927643 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:38:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t0T2cciV002332 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:38:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:38:38 +0100 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux "Ghost" Remote Code Execution Vulnerability Message-Id: <20150129033838.810254de.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20150128145247.5086e9a4@scorpio> References: <20150128145247.5086e9a4@scorpio> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 02:38:49 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:52:47 -0500, Jerry wrote: > Does this vulnerability affect FreeBSD? > > https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/current-activity/2015/01/27/Linux-Ghost-Remote-Code-Execution-Vulnerability FreeBSD's gethostbyname() is located in the standard C library, which is libc, not glibc (that Linux is using), so probably FreeBSD is not affected. However, programs linked against glibc and run in the Linux ABI environment might be affected, I assume. You can find a demonstration program here: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/01/27/9 It's in section 4. On my home system, I get this: % cc -Wall -o ghost ghost.c % ./ghost should not happen Surprise: Neither "vulnerable" nor "not vulnerable" is printed. That result is interesting. It might indicate ternary logic. YES, NO, FILE_NOT_FOUND. :-) Note that 4.1 explicitely talks about "The GNU C Library" which FreeBSD does not use (or have). Section 4 mentions other programs (such as mount.nfs, ping, procmail) for further explanation. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 03:06:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 341365D4 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:06:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22c.google.com (mail-ie0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE319F92 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id rd18so28176949iec.3 for ; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:06:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Npt+tpJha+Utj/3URXNbv0vRCxF8c2P0o8FajtuZ5Ho=; b=AyNOXBLC9bTSj26lXViiP9MC+nKZPbgkKqMgL5U8YinIfenKQSPeNrIgUjHneYSlfz Qv1Up1CD0anP95INqQGDb4kpkR3FdjMvgEOvsK6JJuuwxuw2FAz/PpbduRIdMqXtPuuZ fa5PzAkgtMRm217H13qVDbzeZ/AloBcT4HfJCoRSClpfVbu0/D5+I0FNGFTwo4CFs6DZ G7tALHJtCQaBWKyDAao6n9zWr6wdEg6re4D7c3655sRjYaBU1OucBdcDbPS0vMT9cmUB 2CVuzIARJ/qTSNDUWFM/FzJYV8K7LCMOxJAe6+WDVwNRpnO7pwL56AeevuYcboZNIq9E /Yug== X-Received: by 10.42.145.5 with SMTP id d5mr862525icv.8.1422500776963; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:06:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([50.243.6.59]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t8sm303995igs.21.2015.01.28.19.06.16 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:06:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54C9A3A7.5080202@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:06:15 -0700 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux "Ghost" Remote Code Execution Vulnerability References: <20150128145247.5086e9a4@scorpio> <20150129033838.810254de.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20150129033838.810254de.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:06:18 -0000 On 01/28/2015 07:38 PM, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:52:47 -0500, Jerry wrote: >> Does this vulnerability affect FreeBSD? >> >> https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/current-activity/2015/01/27/Linux-Ghost-Remote-Code-Execution-Vulnerability > FreeBSD's gethostbyname() is located in the standard C library, > which is libc, not glibc (that Linux is using), so probably > FreeBSD is not affected. However, programs linked against > glibc and run in the Linux ABI environment might be affected, > I assume. > > You can find a demonstration program here: > > http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/01/27/9 > > It's in section 4. > > On my home system, I get this: > > % cc -Wall -o ghost ghost.c > % ./ghost > should not happen > > Surprise: Neither "vulnerable" nor "not vulnerable" is printed. > That result is interesting. It might indicate ternary logic. > YES, NO, FILE_NOT_FOUND. :-) > > Note that 4.1 explicitely talks about "The GNU C Library" > which FreeBSD does not use (or have). Section 4 mentions > other programs (such as mount.nfs, ping, procmail) for > further explanation. Then you do not have the real mccoy. This is the real Mccoy: /* ghosttest.c: GHOST vulnerability tester */ /* Credit: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/01/27/9 */ #include #include #include #include #include #define CANARY "in_the_coal_mine" struct { char buffer[1024]; char canary[sizeof(CANARY)]; } temp = { "buffer", CANARY }; int main(void) { struct hostent resbuf; struct hostent *result; int herrno; int retval; /*** strlen (name) = size_needed - sizeof (*host_addr) - sizeof (*h_addr_ptrs) - 1; ***/ size_t len = sizeof(temp.buffer) - 16*sizeof(unsigned char) - 2*sizeof(char *) - 1; char name[sizeof(temp.buffer)]; memset(name, '0', len); name[len] = '\0'; retval = gethostbyname_r(name, &resbuf, temp.buffer, sizeof(temp.buffer), &result, &herrno); if (strcmp(temp.canary, CANARY) != 0) { puts("vulnerable"); exit(EXIT_SUCCESS); } if (retval == ERANGE) { puts("not vulnerable"); exit(EXIT_SUCCESS); } puts("should not happen"); exit(EXIT_FAILURE); } From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 03:43:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2272F98E for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [50.250.218.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C4EF402 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CAF746D86BA9; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:43:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 19:43:11 -0800 From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: mysql dependencies, but I have mariadb Message-ID: <20150129034311.GB86143@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:43:19 -0000 --BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I'm increasingly running into trouble building ports because they depend on the original mysql. I use mariadb and everything I see says this is preferable to mysql. Is there a way to tell pkg and the ports to accept mariadb equivalents of mysql packages? Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUyaxPAAoJEBV64x4SNmAr9DYP/1582b7yidYx16YaW/Ki+hwR erFFq6s/Bxi9P8/3zBQ0FkSNivT/sBzg3ksbl1EIYc55frg7GhfZJdvvWY/ehbZo 0xAcg4bhHPUQd8ZgEZ8ebxRalFc8VJaYUNzjsdvIohksQrdcGpnRvwISz2MCPoFm B1uiBwgDe4dfsMbGZiuNp/Nk0qUsysinlUPh2JHm9ROdNBaekuAktFZrD6JYmhGY U3eRyG73xlOnva51J8nisNS9FOY9yidBmwgXQsO5DFYkxxlovY2kpNyCkm3UG0B7 3KIT4CUH9B+P1iXqY65a+SZlxJ6Y5cVJNyyU84AkEXaVciN9FxIRjsT7+XDFQmq7 1U4NhWJjjTQaZ+QX0xA4vd2lAO17LmcK+auNKWrnSq5CsVeqnKLdlmnhEF/Xs43V t9ckF6TVIAbyzSLf1xyxsjL2H5Y0EYi5UmuMTNINqzpX9fEorFlwAyMUQGH/YhiI O2JGr5H4pxUk8IBNrc82Zr+Z/c62yccxrv9yVDHiGH3O+lMPNoi877LwsZ5CMm8D 2nVrrIQw/a9y0aRMK04LUHD4H6JIAkS5CngkmzRPkXZOciNCHBuP16pvz2NesKvA rdVgzXURDmOaGK9SirtU6/FzLTP1Ih6ipPwHCn6ZcF4JvoQ95xcqJoQPIuaYW0nI VoRhziSIxOpPTXc7jVje =pJQJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BwCQnh7xodEAoBMC-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 03:53:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E90A7B4B for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EE206D9 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:53:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-61-84.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.61.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDD5027640; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 04:53:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t0T3rh9f002698; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 04:53:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 04:53:43 +0100 From: Polytropon To: jd1008 Subject: Re: Linux "Ghost" Remote Code Execution Vulnerability Message-Id: <20150129045343.59f750ea.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <54C9A3A7.5080202@gmail.com> References: <20150128145247.5086e9a4@scorpio> <20150129033838.810254de.freebsd@edvax.de> <54C9A3A7.5080202@gmail.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 03:53:48 -0000 On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:06:15 -0700, jd1008 wrote: > > On 01/28/2015 07:38 PM, Polytropon wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:52:47 -0500, Jerry wrote: > >> Does this vulnerability affect FreeBSD? > >> > >> https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/current-activity/2015/01/27/Linux-Ghost-Remote-Code-Execution-Vulnerability > > FreeBSD's gethostbyname() is located in the standard C library, > > which is libc, not glibc (that Linux is using), so probably > > FreeBSD is not affected. However, programs linked against > > glibc and run in the Linux ABI environment might be affected, > > I assume. > > > > You can find a demonstration program here: > > > > http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/01/27/9 > > > > It's in section 4. > > > > On my home system, I get this: > > > > % cc -Wall -o ghost ghost.c > > % ./ghost > > should not happen > > > > Surprise: Neither "vulnerable" nor "not vulnerable" is printed. > > That result is interesting. It might indicate ternary logic. > > YES, NO, FILE_NOT_FOUND. :-) > > > > Note that 4.1 explicitely talks about "The GNU C Library" > > which FreeBSD does not use (or have). Section 4 mentions > > other programs (such as mount.nfs, ping, procmail) for > > further explanation. > Then you do not have the real mccoy. I'm a doctor, not a cuckoo clock! :-) > This is the real Mccoy: > > /* ghosttest.c: GHOST vulnerability tester */ > /* Credit: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/01/27/9 */ > #include > #include > #include > #include > #include > > #define CANARY "in_the_coal_mine" > > struct { > char buffer[1024]; > char canary[sizeof(CANARY)]; > } temp = { "buffer", CANARY }; > > int main(void) { > struct hostent resbuf; > struct hostent *result; > int herrno; > int retval; > > /*** strlen (name) = size_needed - sizeof (*host_addr) - sizeof > (*h_addr_ptrs) - 1; ***/ > size_t len = sizeof(temp.buffer) - 16*sizeof(unsigned char) - > 2*sizeof(char *) - 1; > char name[sizeof(temp.buffer)]; > memset(name, '0', len); > name[len] = '\0'; > > retval = gethostbyname_r(name, &resbuf, temp.buffer, > sizeof(temp.buffer), &result, &herrno); > > if (strcmp(temp.canary, CANARY) != 0) { > puts("vulnerable"); > exit(EXIT_SUCCESS); > } > if (retval == ERANGE) { > puts("not vulnerable"); > exit(EXIT_SUCCESS); > } > puts("should not happen"); > exit(EXIT_FAILURE); > } Tested with the code from your message (and the one directly copied from the web page mentioned): % cc -Wall -o ghosttest ghosttest.c && ./ghosttest should not happen But that's maybe because my home system isn't a _current_ FreeBSD version, that's why it offers a 3rd choice... ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 04:05:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62C7BC92 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 04:05:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.cyberleo.net (paka.cyberleo.net [216.226.128.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EFB481B for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 04:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.44.4] (vitani.den.cyberleo.net [216.80.73.130]) by mail.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFBB3178AB; Wed, 28 Jan 2015 23:05:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <54C9B188.2050808@cyberleo.net> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 22:05:28 -0600 From: CyberLeo Kitsana User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "William A. Mahaffey III" , "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> <20150128071441.GA29698@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C8EFF3.6050803@hiwaay.net> <54C8FB09.5030305@cyberleo.net> <54C90E98.3080304@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <54C90E98.3080304@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 04:05:32 -0000 On 01/28/2015 10:30 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:21:44am] 503 % qemu-system-i386 -cdrom > ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon -vga std > -no-acpi -localtime > Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key > (:20227): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0.0 > [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:21:48am] 504 % > > I am logged into root via 'su' from my regular user, rxvt-2.6.4_6 > terminal window, system tcsh, xfce-4.10_7 desktop, > xorg-server-1.14.7_1,1, FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5 .... The su process > doesn't get the graphics environment set correctly for root, I see this > a lot :-/ .... What do I need to do to get the GUI to display for me ? > TIA & thanks for your reply. Either authorize root by running this, as the user logged into X: xhost +si:localuser:root or copy the xauth cookie into root's account using something like the following: sh -c 'xauth list "${DISPLAY}" | sed -e "s/^/add /" | sudo xauth' But I suppose a better question is: why are you running qemu as root? -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Technical Administrator CyberLeo.Net Webhosting http://www.CyberLeo.Net Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 09:51:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20A86EF6 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:51:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relaygateway01.edpnet.net (relaygateway01.edpnet.net [212.71.1.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A615BEA1 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:51:54 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AocLACQBylTV2568/2dsb2JhbABagwYiMEIXgwHBUQaFbwSBIUQBAQEBAX2ENgQvXxMOAhEFJYhnsEGPSJEXhRaQFYIXDC8RgTAFkj+FVgGSRiKBRQyCHj0xgkIBAQE X-IPAS-Result: AocLACQBylTV2568/2dsb2JhbABagwYiMEIXgwHBUQaFbwSBIUQBAQEBAX2ENgQvXxMOAhEFJYhnsEGPSJEXhRaQFYIXDC8RgTAFkj+FVgGSRiKBRQyCHj0xgkIBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,485,1418079600"; d="scan'208";a="306712821" Received: from 213.219.158.188.adsl.dyn.edpnet.net (HELO mordor.lan) ([213.219.158.188]) by relaygateway01.edpnet.net with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 29 Jan 2015 10:11:10 +0100 Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 10:50:42 +0100 From: Julien Cigar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: pkg upgrade fails to bring in dependencies ...? Message-ID: <20150129095041.GR1183@mordor.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qxmd2aOE9n9J83EO" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:51:56 -0000 --qxmd2aOE9n9J83EO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Any idea for the following: https://dpaste.de/NB81/raw ? In other words, there is a shared library bump for png (1.5.x -> 1.6.x) and I don't understand why pkg doesn't upgrade all the packages which depend on png. This is with a custom repo (poudriere) and pkg 1.4.7. Should I fill a bug report ? Thanks, Julien --=20 Julien Cigar Belgian Biodiversity Platform (http://www.biodiversity.be) PGP fingerprint: EEF9 F697 4B68 D275 7B11 6A25 B2BB 3710 A204 23C0 No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. --qxmd2aOE9n9J83EO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCgAGBQJUygJxAAoJEAi2KiTKQR5pmI8P/jCIYQGstElaJUmOi3a06InS 1uQ06OFiWHsF0t94UA1MqnQQwtSCoDPBgNTaqwG+1wEnHWB+EyVcMlnB3XIuY/4X C7aU/Z0C8E0iW+NudG4ORbO17V23Ydd4IKL5dnD+U2mlvfBZXfEM30D4QflwbEuK VMYnSzK4PwtTfuuSdm6S1UsPkhACGVQU1F7rLtH4p1JqkWYIPuISH7XlJty5uE4Y 98Lun7XPIDPNIUAdPNSUDM20c3Xc3wP9VtVPGMs1hyeTPSneI+HeFfHYH17i9yWi h/D0jIdPaimZlh3vJ/5L4fGVBji/ve/G1ycvElhc6GNHDfOLy4uTFuHQDTlrHTSS 6hJvj4ffUY93em1tOLSdpDc+WbLrslwlhuc4vwTCPJlVyQctZX4uA2bpjGJlBB00 JTN7v2BhgdtJYnNftcYis0qEPvrxhxsFt/nbn5BY84ig11r+cVwqZx90Ow7KBOEv t9zRyQ49SU9LkSkx4arUVYnaC+tURy6bdBeL2+GZ46z7Kwq+pX+PurkGibopvkbo 0RIHfrpGFAjXTCUPd5KUOOENgbgcRTf40CZEnU6bVTbBoVv07KadTKffJvqMJwhk kwDfvqTVOkhd4Zzaiu90AKpvPXK4eUF1hor8NX52ShYS0n4UVJqmrNpVt3KCTPlI XvjfRrutLGiSju0+QWXn =guA7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qxmd2aOE9n9J83EO-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 14:34:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5E90588 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 14:34:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.52.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925C91E0 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 14:34:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id 821F8CB8C9D; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 08:34:31 -0600 (CST) Received: from 69.209.237.9 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 08:34:31 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <7617.69.209.237.9.1422542071.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <20150129045343.59f750ea.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20150128145247.5086e9a4@scorpio> <20150129033838.810254de.freebsd@edvax.de> <54C9A3A7.5080202@gmail.com> <20150129045343.59f750ea.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 08:34:31 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Linux "Ghost" Remote Code Execution Vulnerability From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "Polytropon" Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, jd1008 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 14:34:33 -0000 On Wed, January 28, 2015 9:53 pm, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 20:06:15 -0700, jd1008 wrote: >> >> On 01/28/2015 07:38 PM, Polytropon wrote: >> > On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:52:47 -0500, Jerry wrote: >> >> Does this vulnerability affect FreeBSD? >> >> >> >> https://www.us-cert.gov/ncas/current-activity/2015/01/27/Linux-Ghost-Remote-Code-Execution-Vulnerability >> > FreeBSD's gethostbyname() is located in the standard C library, >> > which is libc, not glibc (that Linux is using), so probably >> > FreeBSD is not affected. However, programs linked against >> > glibc and run in the Linux ABI environment might be affected, >> > I assume. >> > >> > You can find a demonstration program here: >> > >> > http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/01/27/9 >> > >> > It's in section 4. >> > >> > On my home system, I get this: >> > >> > % cc -Wall -o ghost ghost.c >> > % ./ghost >> > should not happen >> > >> > Surprise: Neither "vulnerable" nor "not vulnerable" is printed. >> > That result is interesting. It might indicate ternary logic. >> > YES, NO, FILE_NOT_FOUND. :-) >> > >> > Note that 4.1 explicitely talks about "The GNU C Library" >> > which FreeBSD does not use (or have). Section 4 mentions >> > other programs (such as mount.nfs, ping, procmail) for >> > further explanation. >> Then you do not have the real mccoy. > > I'm a doctor, not a cuckoo clock! :-) > > > >> This is the real Mccoy: >> >> /* ghosttest.c: GHOST vulnerability tester */ >> /* Credit: http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2015/01/27/9 */ >> #include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> #include >> >> #define CANARY "in_the_coal_mine" >> >> struct { >> char buffer[1024]; >> char canary[sizeof(CANARY)]; >> } temp = { "buffer", CANARY }; >> >> int main(void) { >> struct hostent resbuf; >> struct hostent *result; >> int herrno; >> int retval; >> >> /*** strlen (name) = size_needed - sizeof (*host_addr) - sizeof >> (*h_addr_ptrs) - 1; ***/ >> size_t len = sizeof(temp.buffer) - 16*sizeof(unsigned char) - >> 2*sizeof(char *) - 1; >> char name[sizeof(temp.buffer)]; >> memset(name, '0', len); >> name[len] = '\0'; >> >> retval = gethostbyname_r(name, &resbuf, temp.buffer, >> sizeof(temp.buffer), &result, &herrno); >> >> if (strcmp(temp.canary, CANARY) != 0) { >> puts("vulnerable"); >> exit(EXIT_SUCCESS); >> } >> if (retval == ERANGE) { >> puts("not vulnerable"); >> exit(EXIT_SUCCESS); >> } >> puts("should not happen"); >> exit(EXIT_FAILURE); >> } > > Tested with the code from your message (and the one directly > copied from the web page mentioned): > > % cc -Wall -o ghosttest ghosttest.c && ./ghosttest > should not happen > > But that's maybe because my home system isn't a _current_ > FreeBSD version, that's why it offers a 3rd choice... ;-) > It says "shouldn't happen" because people running systems with non-GNU libc shouldn't test glibc vulnerability, they should sit back and happily drink coffee or tea instead ;-) Valeri ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 15:19:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 724CCF53 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A2FD92B for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-159.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.159]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t0TFJ63A020043 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:19:07 -0600 Message-ID: <54CA50E1.2060607@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:25:21 -0600 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Re: Is QEMU working/reliable under .... References: <54C7C62A.5030605@hiwaay.net> <20150127210422.GA27921@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C838CE.7040502@hiwaay.net> <20150128071441.GA29698@slackbox.erewhon.home> <54C8EFF3.6050803@hiwaay.net> <54C8FB09.5030305@cyberleo.net> <54C90E98.3080304@hiwaay.net> <54C9B188.2050808@cyberleo.net> In-Reply-To: <54C9B188.2050808@cyberleo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 15:19:09 -0000 On 01/28/15 22:05, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote: > On 01/28/2015 10:30 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:21:44am] 503 % qemu-system-i386 -cdrom >> ../../../ISOs/winxp.iso -hda HDD.img -m 256 -boot d -cpu athlon -vga std >> -no-acpi -localtime >> Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key >> (:20227): Gtk-WARNING **: cannot open display: :0.0 >> [root@kabini1, WinXP, 10:21:48am] 504 % >> >> I am logged into root via 'su' from my regular user, rxvt-2.6.4_6 >> terminal window, system tcsh, xfce-4.10_7 desktop, >> xorg-server-1.14.7_1,1, FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p5 .... The su process >> doesn't get the graphics environment set correctly for root, I see this >> a lot :-/ .... What do I need to do to get the GUI to display for me ? >> TIA & thanks for your reply. > Either authorize root by running this, as the user logged into X: > > xhost +si:localuser:root > > or copy the xauth cookie into root's account using something like the > following: > > sh -c 'xauth list "${DISPLAY}" | sed -e "s/^/add /" | sudo xauth' > > But I suppose a better question is: why are you running qemu as root? > Someone else already pointed out that running qemu as root is unnecessary :-). I suppose my answer would be 'out of ignorance' (I *think* I recall you had to do that under FC14, the last time I used it there was several years back). In any event, I copied the .Xauthority from my $USER to /root & all went well. I have the VM (guest) setup & can boot it from $USER (Hooray, couldn't do that under FC14), so I am relatively happy. The guest can't see the host, which is a problem, my read of the man page & the qemu help output implies that I can fix this on the fly w/ a combination of more args to qemu &/or host configuration. I will be back w/ questions there if needed, but I seem to be OK for now. Thanks to all who assisted :-) !!!! -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 16:33:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9A3D692 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:33:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outbound.ifdnrg.com (outbound.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.38]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1B7356 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:33:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.5] (97e5f7bf.skybroadband.com [151.229.247.191]) (authenticated bits=0) by outbound.ifdnrg.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t0TGVYSC087843 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:31:42 GMT (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) X-Authentication-Warning: outbound.ifdnrg.com: Host 97e5f7bf.skybroadband.com [151.229.247.191] claimed to be [192.168.0.5] Message-ID: <54CA6069.7080804@ifdnrg.com> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:31:37 +0000 From: Paul Macdonald User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: php55 change on datetime functions? References: <20150128081145.GA17133@home.parts-unknown.org> In-Reply-To: <20150128081145.GA17133@home.parts-unknown.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:33:01 -0000 On 28/01/2015 08:11, David Benfell wrote: > SQLSTATE[22007]: Invalid datetime format try this? http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17598629/mysql-incorrect-datetime-format -- ------------------------- Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd Web and video hosting ------------------------- t: 0131 5548070 m: 07970339546 e: paul@ifdnrg.com w: http://www.ifdnrg.com ------------------------- IFDNRG 40 Maritime Street Edinburgh EH6 6SA ---------------------------------------------------- High Specification Dedicated Servers from 100.00pm ---------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 16:34:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ED92745 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:34:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.physics.umn.edu (smtp.spa.umn.edu [128.101.220.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BDE4376 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:34:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-66-41-25-68.hsd1.mn.comcast.net ([66.41.25.68] helo=[192.168.0.137]) by mail.physics.umn.edu with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YGrO1-000Mqp-Bp for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:52:05 -0600 Message-ID: <54CA5722.5000807@physics.umn.edu> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 09:52:02 -0600 From: Graham Allan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mysql dependencies, but I have mariadb References: <20150129034311.GB86143@home.parts-unknown.org> In-Reply-To: <20150129034311.GB86143@home.parts-unknown.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:34:49 -0000 I don't have any definitive answer for you but I *believe* you want to set something like: USE_MYSQL_VER=55m where the "m" signifies to use the mariadb variant... Sorry but that's the extent of my notes on the subject! Graham On 1/28/2015 9:43 PM, David Benfell wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm increasingly running into trouble building ports because they > depend on the original mysql. I use mariadb and everything I see says > this is preferable to mysql. > > Is there a way to tell pkg and the ports to accept mariadb equivalents > of mysql packages? > > Thanks! > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 19:42:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F224F1A for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:42:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [50.250.218.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45194E65 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:42:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D9FFD6D86BA9; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:42:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:42:38 -0800 From: David Benfell To: Paul Macdonald Subject: Not really RESOLVED, but also not php55's fault: Re: php55 change on datetime functions? Message-ID: <20150129194238.GB50850@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20150128081145.GA17133@home.parts-unknown.org> <54CA6069.7080804@ifdnrg.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54CA6069.7080804@ifdnrg.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:42:40 -0000 --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 04:31:37PM +0000, Paul Macdonald wrote: > On 28/01/2015 08:11, David Benfell wrote: > > SQLSTATE[22007]: Invalid datetime format > try this? > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17598629/mysql-incorrect-datetime-form= at >=20 Actually, it turned out the blame for this lies with Drupal. I even reproduced it on drupal.org. (No, I really do not go around trying to induce errors on other people's sites. Facepalm. I was trying to add a note to a similar bug report.) It never even occurred to me that some weird characters--emoji actually--might be a problem. But they are for Drupal: https://www.drupal.org/node/2260317/revisions/view/7217519/7217521 --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUyo0uAAoJEBV64x4SNmAr6A0QAKi9uW4BI6Tnjxx1Z1OSwKvq qCIf1PjFVwGcHPAcoxPYxDeKMqvP1paZMPTdq/zRofi72AMB7ysvl6GQNRis06e+ aMHUqL+nc3XGsv5XimfJKq4uizqWSCEpsyW06h4R61xmmBLAPbLuo4ConR2PvRCr Zj6+TatHHe85RtuqTuSWqCMLfHjEPrhLGYLUGdSwNjXrynG1nSTZKjCsTjeWox/n f5XLTrxHk0zgcTeVK0xKMVV6B/d/hik92ycRqSHlradGTuhdxHSIwF/IW3mqAAVE rjPz2QugXOm5o2C+S/M51eLpQsAUYaVE/dgy7b4Ek8G5jf6c+x5dsDUPwfWtKUWE EfISIqgB4qDHFsfCQhps5As/1YGKNhlGDop43vMQd/NAQ+OPsCkF8v/UmOTAJfL0 9i3Q2YVOg3odQVOdzT7wZougn0Ig5M3dZYaAjU3KmSjHaiMxDfLG2Us+rPImqCnF lQJoQGrNL88BMcpj7ZB7nbajqS1+DeILurZ4n9QZx0NrZsd0U1Lw3TXIZUgXa/+w rm2s38+dq5K2ifnj2yA6156dUyyTKdBeUwQRSH2pas5iA3GLYILNJhTrbGwar3/j 7JEUBPIYO0pPqVhkWt4ZSMfA4OfKu4tflJyAF6UQEIh3udOaHtCZjkcACYnIcsKN i+WiqLQuiSdrgah2L9P6 =/TtJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 19:43:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4DA9FA9 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oi0-f42.google.com (mail-oi0-f42.google.com [209.85.218.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C4C9E7A for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f42.google.com with SMTP id i138so30266738oig.1 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:43:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=MirZtX1OBz2Yb2n5LhV2vMpyUvjntkoX/NHjIA4NRag=; b=dva2e/v6rrzG/nw6pDWnyOe6SSF3po/Fi/hZqTwPcXT9eAGe5iT4JP+VjFUKWshPIk Faro/0Qc7VfQOoMiIdZB3JW5++WPTYSdqe9V1LjCZc4mwUGCIkdrqC96V4AWDHifYlYG dnmt2CT8epA84/p8ce7p6710vUL2twAF72SYfWfoQYIhB93rlBj2aEGWGU+vjAgN0NU5 Blj+5M/Qq1LQkDA5tFvNuGntc2N9Yr1Xh4C+sd/Js7dUKgAgzu/BkL0GlGySomMExPyH /ysNlMUfXHqEFI2bFJL5t5BXdxyxh6TR/ZbKF7rnah/JvJG2tr7ghIbRvk/jvbrfsnMA FV8Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl17iCx07e6t4MBaE6NC9NAq890BKf6FqGTpJ5jRn1ak3iw6PPD2eaz7WSY8xw4S5/Bbr61 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.185.198 with SMTP id j189mr1448742oif.72.1422560596270; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:43:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.202.51.196 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:43:16 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [93.221.161.223] In-Reply-To: <54C6D6AE.7040306@cyberleo.net> References: <54C6D6AE.7040306@cyberleo.net> Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:43:16 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Semi-OT] SFF-8087 to eSata? From: "C. P. Ghost" To: CyberLeo Kitsana Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:43:17 -0000 On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 1:07 AM, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote: > On 01/26/2015 12:25 PM, C. P. Ghost wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm trying to connect an external enclosure for SATA drives > > which comes with a single eSata connector for 8 drives in > > JBOD mode on one side (it's an IcyBox IB-3680SU3) to an > > HBA which comes with 2 external SFF-8087 connectors > > for 4 drives each (that's an Avago SAS HBA 9207-8e, which > > supports up to 1024 HDDs according to specs). > > That HBA has an SFF-8088 port (well, two), not SFF-8087. SFF-8088 is > external, the 8087 variant is internal, and looks completely different. > You're right, it's two SFF-8088 ports, not 8087. My mistake. The HBA identifies itself like this on that machine (flashed firmware and BIOS from P17 to P19 to match FreeBSD's own mps driver): mps0: port 0xd000-0xd0ff mem 0xfe9f0000-0xfe9fffff,0xfe980000-0xfe9bffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci2 mps0: Firmware: 19.00.00.00, Driver: 19.00.00.00-fbsd mps0: IOCCapabilities: 5285c Looks like it is usable on FreeBSD 10.1 / amd64 without any proprietary driver. So far, so good (keeping fingers crossed). It looks like the enclosure funnels all disks through a single link, > probably via something like a SATA port multiplier if you're lucky; but > as the glossy pointedly leaves out support for anything but Windows 7/8 > and OSX, it may well be a proprietary driver necessary to expose all > eight bays. If my experience with similar setups is any indication, > you're likely to want to toss this thing down the stairs in short order. > I'll get physical access to the enclosure in about two days. I hope all drives / bays are exposed throught that port multiplier; even if the performance will be terrible. If not, I'll recommend to toss that enclosure away, and to get a real SAS enclosure instead. > I'm trying to set up an external ZFS pool on those 8 drives. > > I did something similar, but chose to dedicate a link to each drive > instead of faffing about with expanders or port multipliers. An LSI > 9207-8e HBA, two Addonics AD4SMSAS bridges, a little creative dremeling, > and a couple Amphenol SFF-8088 cables hooked up two enclosures nicely. > Yes, that's a very good idea. I'll keep it in mind. :) > Now, I'm wondering what kind of cable or cable wizardry > > I need to get both SFF-8087 with the single JBOD eSata > > port connected. Is that possible at all? > > SFF-8087 and SFF-8088 both carry four SAS/SATA links; in theory, you > would only need one, so something like this[1] would be most useful for > you. The other seven lanes could be used for other things. > > [1] http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000JQ51CM > That's exactly what I had in mind: using one eSATA connector to connect to the port multiplier of the enclosure, and leave the other 3 connectors dangling, for future use (using only one of the two 8088 ports). The HBA *should* access 8 drives through this single eSATA connector... if the SATA port multiplier of the enclosure is smart enough. At least, that's the theory. Will see how it plays out IRL. Thanks, -cpghost. > -- > Fuzzy love, > -CyberLeo > Technical Administrator > CyberLeo.Net Webhosting > http://www.CyberLeo.Net > > > Furry Peace! - http://www.fur.com/peace/ > -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 19:46:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21E49108 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:46:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3F79EA6 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 45DFA6D86BA9; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:45:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 11:45:59 -0800 From: David Benfell To: Graham Allan Subject: Re: mysql dependencies, but I have mariadb Message-ID: <20150129194559.GC50850@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20150129034311.GB86143@home.parts-unknown.org> <54CA5722.5000807@physics.umn.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5G06lTa6Jq83wMTw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54CA5722.5000807@physics.umn.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 19:46:00 -0000 --5G06lTa6Jq83wMTw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 09:52:02AM -0600, Graham Allan wrote: > I don't have any definitive answer for you but I *believe* you want to=20 > set something like: >=20 > USE_MYSQL_VER=3D55m >=20 > where the "m" signifies to use the mariadb variant... Oh, how embarassing. The line was sitting right there in my /etc/make.conf. I didn't notice it. Apparently, what I want is: WANT_MYSQL_VER=3D55m # 55m for MariaDB, 55p for Percona > Sorry but that's the extent of my notes on the subject! But you pointed me at the right thing. Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --5G06lTa6Jq83wMTw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUyo33AAoJEBV64x4SNmArdI8QAIS/2gKvjv9UzEC6/lgRLAUT VHgCilBkCz/8i1JSjZsXC7H+Z9HGDP+ZBztmwHdHXA1RBwfVvGYYUcqnRo8y3Lvs Zg5z26WB7IAukz2AmxLvgGK4huCUyAVjc23or4j0M+QIB2G0ZcaTIkNVTac+1u2h KzoXHjbwDSl1p4Te4PxCkiVslsEUL/1Y9BOjfSx0ETI68QM6lDyExwzDJwBjgYFz +AQbCbUKdJuLmFiyOz2OZz8cxkLGEYc8a6S8/0mhDrd7AcKvxpbQ2EBIrD/jcKSH IEJAPzAZ4MaY3HpXNSwpYBlZ63sBm3xdwzkvjzzCt90OWfo1Xtk3yk0KdzyAjacj 89P00pY6+qLhuZh0PWXpYb+svj0QOoBwGHwLcOa2TXxZgRK4LKMjE/JUvyfHC4ep ybei7AFzL/xvCPaFDo+BpzrdUTmrCgYL3m8oGrihQkj4Qz3l41p2/iY5S7FPz7Ue mSclm5mtDDNAvEL6fOIwGQjBCLAYAwJdx9k4sbCc7jMc/gXmm9GlD9gKrVEdlUU7 kze9BqTZBN5TkFOTJiANsV+upLtQQjB4/PFzjhXnE/qcUIErIYdu4WXp8FWdc2Xv 8RI80NKf+VsmQ6UUwoIaDmQ0RVp1fmpKBs1aEuSUtNzG6bSK3NZiYAFnOqNd5pyZ 0QTyP8J9+cvJhiWWvTvb =EV8S -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5G06lTa6Jq83wMTw-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 20:15:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7D186B3 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:15:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.physics.umn.edu (smtp.spa.umn.edu [128.101.220.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 855FF23F for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:15:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from peevish.spa.umn.edu ([128.101.220.230]) by mail.physics.umn.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1YGvV4-0008dI-MM; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 14:15:38 -0600 Received: by peevish.spa.umn.edu (Postfix, from userid 5000) id 9B9B84FE; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 14:15:38 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 14:15:38 -0600 From: Graham Allan To: David Benfell Subject: Re: mysql dependencies, but I have mariadb Message-ID: <20150129201538.GB31947@physics.umn.edu> References: <20150129034311.GB86143@home.parts-unknown.org> <54CA5722.5000807@physics.umn.edu> <20150129194559.GC50850@home.parts-unknown.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150129194559.GC50850@home.parts-unknown.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:15:40 -0000 On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:45:59AM -0800, David Benfell wrote: > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 09:52:02AM -0600, Graham Allan wrote: > > I don't have any definitive answer for you but I *believe* you want to > > set something like: > > > > USE_MYSQL_VER=55m > > > > where the "m" signifies to use the mariadb variant... > > Oh, how embarassing. The line was sitting right there in my > /etc/make.conf. I didn't notice it. Apparently, what I want is: > > WANT_MYSQL_VER=55m # 55m for MariaDB, 55p for Percona Just to throw in a third variant I checked our tinderbox env, and what I actually have there is: WITH_MYSQL_VER=55m which did work correctly last time I built everything. Now I find my tinderbox notes, they say something to the effect "USE_*, WANT_*, and HAVE_* macros must NEVER be passed in make.conf, in the environment, or on the make command line." I wish I could give you a reference for that; I'm pretty sure I didn't make it up :-) Oh, there's some reference to this in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk: # Note: the distinction between the USE_* and WANT_* variables, and the # WITH_* and WITHOUT_* variables, are that the former are restricted to # usage inside the ports framework, and the latter are reserved for user- # settable options. (Setting USE_* in /etc/make.conf is always wrong). and also some useful bits in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.database.mk Glad I found that again, I'd forgotten why we did it this way! Graham From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 20:22:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 137CB861 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E48C734E for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2B7FD6D86BA9; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:22:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 12:22:17 -0800 From: David Benfell To: Graham Allan Subject: Re: mysql dependencies, but I have mariadb Message-ID: <20150129202217.GA94413@home.parts-unknown.org> References: <20150129034311.GB86143@home.parts-unknown.org> <54CA5722.5000807@physics.umn.edu> <20150129194559.GC50850@home.parts-unknown.org> <20150129201538.GB31947@physics.umn.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="17pEHd4RhPHOinZp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150129201538.GB31947@physics.umn.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:22:18 -0000 --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 02:15:38PM -0600, Graham Allan wrote: >=20 > Just to throw in a third variant I checked our tinderbox env, and what I > actually have there is: >=20 > WITH_MYSQL_VER=3D55m >=20 > which did work correctly last time I built everything. Now I find my > tinderbox notes, they say something to the effect "USE_*, WANT_*, and > HAVE_* macros must NEVER be passed in make.conf, in the environment, or > on the make command line." I wish I could give you a reference for that; > I'm pretty sure I didn't make it up :-) >=20 I have changed accordingly. I haven't tried the builds that were broken yet. Thanks! --=20 David Benfell See https://parts-unknown.org/node/2 if you don't understand the attachment. --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUypZ5AAoJEBV64x4SNmArd+4P/jWsyZZUFmnDbp+LzofGB0pW IbP41xqBtcjfRYld0JLgMLb5hYuvlzpam3+9sEIaydobX1m2O7ubOP3DuIUePl38 gcmxj3fUBuXk5meu9BmHoYu1V5YsG1fC8N1eyotR9qQ/3WDND9LVkan2RqhEyaoe GaUqLUJ52nUT2T3ypiKqzGbyNyDH/E9d138FEV1SKoBPfi0UkctDL8pZpjutTOay nIjya/Oha/tmXb+RPpmR7nsgH9S+coMiVf41F9EH5AzvBMypMRZ5zFM6TNuoZg/u Quz6wW2bBXBUL0dghUWP/fEG+XPFq1dpYJPWQ0M7QXo7r2lrR7BkIOBrt3xs+f/Z jOp6t/JyvHzOv6NYg5eADU/JSDPG+az5gYYWegi5T0KtYl4oQtS/q3jCT0GJN+SJ iqX6UMbIEvtYEeUIKWKnuHsdV0GeVbOGkCRDYym2fgvOO+Xlo5mHmTvtq5TPYBQ/ e7rICSyAXkdn7pW4KG/xyd3qolCD4kgU5XaquXVKbhpTuYpIB7hU94usgYDEASoR cHWsI7Kohh8gphjsucG0qvKU5RwC6fD5y00o4pfiLZEbS3nAlwUw92zs7gG6GAiR NnFdpplhp0QNO7fEL6xUtBKDH0jrHv3/ZCtqRBNTHE09+ebVhiSy8H0XMnLAGjjB DMFowS46n4e5CSAZK8Hi =rkWh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 00:53:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59CD3380 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:53:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from backend.citywest.ca (backend.citywest.ca [69.176.191.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 08BA2350 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:53:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32121 invoked from network); 30 Jan 2015 00:46:37 -0000 Received: from 71conn34.rupert.net (HELO CWPR10) (kwoody@citywest.ca@69.176.191.34) by backend.citywest.ca with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP (724a6de2-a819-11e4-a7b8-00215edca3d4); Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:46:37 -0800 From: "Keith" To: Subject: FBSD 8.1 Libtool Upgrade. Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:46:21 -0800 Message-ID: <006601d03c26$2af5f3d0$80e1db70$@citywest.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdA8I+JJcy5+Dd3YR2e6+IAQAGMYWg== Content-Language: en-us X-MagicMail-UUID: 724a6de2-a819-11e4-a7b8-00215edca3d4 X-MagicMail-Authenticated: kwoody@citywest.ca X-MagicMail-SourceIP: 69.176.191.34 X-MagicMail-EnvelopeFrom: X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:53:19 -0000 Was going to install NRPE, nagios tool and got this error: ===> Found libtool-2.2.6b, but you need to upgrade to libtool>=2.4 Now this is a production machine running FBSD 8.1 and: Dovecot 2.2.9 Postfix 2.7.1 I am a little concerned about updating a library like this, but from what I have read here: http://www.freshports.org/devel/libtool Neither of these programs use libtool to either build or are needed to run. Those are the only programs that run on this machine except for the usual out of the box type stuff. Would it be safe to upgrade libtool? Thanks, Keith From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 05:32:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AE585F2 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 05:32:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x230.google.com (mail-we0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7D06242 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 05:32:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id w62so25135865wes.7 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 21:32:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=f9EzmFELpkYrYs46xYAqB3P7Td7tWjb0eMkSjzZHYbE=; b=YfnfJBBpjFTvQpuAyzd3MOLAz1UAlJag+20jcLA425hAaSA65mVBO2Y9NlZpJWJC5J L2aTYW/NLNh/S1k8LV7jiaZxIkhNYttN8qb47jLMQv/akC6hcb1XlCpHCOJX6YeJdpl0 Zy9QzLIfrFNVeEzh+BpRIuuGm7Q4WHcFAlpG8V0rKE+BVL8zzIJe19E39+JNTbAVF6tQ PLl1nnfFvFLWKO+r5t8jJ23Z+mcugBtjCBca0LhiCQsgNR1Qd1Z3Iw1ZGRooqbnYoyFT fVgn9uDBEPRfcXc+oJq3x6ZMCPK8RN5VDCKA3UmCnvqOKnXTPDcWBL3ag9ZJ6CE+GJ9V 3Ayg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.237.41 with SMTP id uz9mr8623059wjc.80.1422595938760; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 21:32:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.207.44 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 21:32:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:02:18 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Library in freebsd From: eras mus To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 05:32:21 -0000 Dear All, I am trying to install python-ldap in Plone 4.. I am getting error http://pastebin.com/EFvwDqk8 I was adviced to install libldap2-dev (this is name in ubuntu). How could i install it in Freebsd ? Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 05:48:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10D40870 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 05:48:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x22f.google.com (mail-pa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2ADA36C for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 05:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id lj1so48105801pab.6 for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 21:48:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Fb6tvTm1JHnkbJKLA1AU1DIYKEj5rH0EQQxaHVqR91E=; b=Vrlr0MP6XBJ1R7AuJsd5FyjjEzDpe3BEYJYm7FbAJKTv7xgKZHdyUG7nPjA1vWx3JU 7nLdNunuqbAX3c+vgqvjfcvdqFtxoQ2pD4orJnN/VmMYTv4nVnRc5VhcIB94C8ZhcaIu ErRSibrz9tof842LOgsF3pZMIOteOAcWsq7kT3xhM3YM7UJRC+mvOLKfRpa8Ff8LfSOE ycJeBJWxykCScwK4xPC1gXEThsDYefbzryHq55+bCY2KF7YRGMeVUvw6eiwKBmy9JAlC 2Zq+b7XVvVLDaH2UF6xnygCflIyoUJVxwhsL6kFQ3u0oS17/vQuBiLfluxgSovBM1DtF qLWA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.157.67 with SMTP id wk3mr6276125pab.95.1422596935329; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 21:48:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.101.133 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Jan 2015 21:48:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 23:48:55 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Library in freebsd From: Adam Vande More To: eras mus Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 05:48:56 -0000 On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:32 PM, eras mus wrote: > Dear All, > > I am trying to install python-ldap in Plone 4.. > I am getting error > http://pastebin.com/EFvwDqk8 > > I was adviced to install libldap2-dev (this is name in ubuntu). > > How could i install it in Freebsd ? > pkg install openldap-client -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 11:23:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 478E827D for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:23:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay101.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay101.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA3EB0A for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:23:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=aVuRYB9jFzFsbHnyIO6WTXMsFsysg296qeRS+2aVNsk= c=1 sm=2 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=q56oFxeYAAAA:8 a=daCOBSBCP3r2ydJTVJgA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2AKCQAyactU/xOHsFtagwZSWcRshWsEAgKBHEQBAQEBAX2EDQEFOhwjEAsYCSUPKh4GEwmIJwEI1icBAQEBAQUBAQEBHo0/gjkHhCkFmB2BGIVCi3giggQagVE9MYJCAQEB Received: from 19.135-176-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.176.135.19]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 30 Jan 2015 12:22:27 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t0UBMPPE001828; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 12:22:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 12:22:25 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: "Keith" Subject: Re: FBSD 8.1 Libtool Upgrade. Message-ID: <20150130122225.2d30c9f8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <006601d03c26$2af5f3d0$80e1db70$@citywest.ca> References: <006601d03c26$2af5f3d0$80e1db70$@citywest.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:23:59 -0000 On Thu, 29 Jan 2015 16:46:21 -0800 "Keith" wrote: > Was going to install NRPE, nagios tool and got this error: > > ===> Found libtool-2.2.6b, but you need to upgrade to libtool>=2.4 > > Now this is a production machine running FBSD 8.1 and: > > Dovecot 2.2.9 > Postfix 2.7.1 > > I am a little concerned about updating a library like this, but from what > I have read here: > > http://www.freshports.org/devel/libtool > > Neither of these programs use libtool to either build or are needed to run. > > Those are the only programs that run on this machine except for the usual > out of the box type stuff. > > Would it be safe to upgrade libtool? Libtool is not a library. It's a build tool to build libraries. So it's a probably safe. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 12:45:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4A112D1 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 12:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E118365 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 12:45:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id h11so2766246wiw.5 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 04:44:56 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LeCZeCkPb+9beQN4KrxfM8R8+LuJVDVycdWtIwdSq3I=; b=m4f3BQUWreIeDXqiqJ/A6MkyQdWRSTjNMem8sj7Y/ukrKJPV5kXRlhAYx7auxNO+e0 k9av5N8PblZ3RQt75cMg+ARQRqTILVfLBq63s6PwfUt20Mgwq3aP+04yAdWCGuu9MWji ooqs2vho1FLm6EBGftDiBQAlg6bY4M0isryDrk7rRfDn+5SQHTN7J9u6WVOw07j3ILZI JfYLwh5Qeg94V4OaTavAFtv6Wdd1BidBmoPQWWzpfj307m49dBHq8TSbU1FGOCUnEnr8 Giwffksya4Ngb8FrKEPrrt8eJaIpUIUjEQU7v7RCQgE/zTiI5BilCMVpRKWYExsHKbKb mhyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlt4Hi33Bz4+mBPXB5mlWhGNrVKIsGvE2WOSKVzLX2sp7OjeDEEn/snrfe024Rp1uKCr76s MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.182.67 with SMTP id ec3mr4535167wic.58.1422621896870; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 04:44:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.178.68 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 04:44:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.178.68 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 04:44:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150124164733.GA1669@workbox.Home> References: <20150124164733.GA1669@workbox.Home> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:44:56 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to use two kinds of fonts in x11-wm/dwm bar? From: alphachi To: Bigby James Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "list: freebsd" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 12:45:05 -0000 Thanks! I got it. 2015-1-25 =E4=B8=8A=E5=8D=8812:47=E4=BA=8E "Bigby James" =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > After this, I set the default font to monospace in Firefox and test - > it's > > ok. When I reinstall dwm, the default font of dwm changes to Terminus, > but > > all chars that should use Noto, like CJK chars, can't display correctly= - > > they display as many solid blocks. > > The short answer is that you can only have one font in the dwm statusline= . > There's a patch that allows you to use multiple TTF fonts, which a) you'l= l > have > to apply yourself using patch(1); and b) is incompatible with the XFT > patch.[1] > It also heavily modifies the dwm source code, so any other patches you > wish to > apply afterward will almost certainly have to be applied manually (using = a > text > editor to paste in the diff). > > If you're seeing Terminus in the statusline after reinstalling dwm, then > you > likely overwrote your modified source with the default source during > reinstallation. That's the only explanation I can see for your font > changing > to the default without you modifying the config file. > > [1]: http://dwm.suckless.org/patches/pango > > -- > "A common mistake that people make when trying to design something > completely > foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas > Adams > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 13:04:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14A0079D for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:04:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x235.google.com (mail-ie0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D086377C for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:04:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id rp18so3116523iec.12 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 05:04:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LfXx9g/d53qKI4MBZii9YCL/6yq4lk8RPAORj7k/+sA=; b=V2W7wsiMWFN7P0RnD8PPQk5Uyp8rARiFk8R5NcalaVVmOSdFi73WC4ofdgNPK438S4 f1v3AH67EOJ91YY6UKtt7IwglDMyHOVB2cY/uKFjsg6OPKekLhQHLUAfp2jySyarWBqr gYvU+4LTnmpcphMRwX08kKMfSX3Lx8q0tqegFRMjJ2RG6q4Xrj8WaTGFItkF60Wj6EKE yoWv8ZZMyJ+2eidQgo9aeR0pQj+FtKxBXmREI09D9NO6uOZUrsmykzvUk5daKuGoriCc IkIR8RlwFf2ohvc0TP7bRoDjlte7nD9ULug2llQOvIX/tcpCzqCzOXR7vQo4yPJhC4l5 1SRA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.148.206 with SMTP id w197mr7020804iod.73.1422623056227; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 05:04:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.15.193 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 05:04:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 18:34:16 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Perfomance counter tool From: Sai Prajeeth To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:04:17 -0000 Hello list, I am not sure if this has been asked before but does FreeBSD have any tool to measure performance counters like Linux's 'Perf' ? Some command line tool that can spit out the IPC of the system or something like that? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 13:24:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1532FC56 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:24:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9CB9297D for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t0UDNwUD052081 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:23:59 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t0UDNwUD052081 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1422624239; bh=I7i0Bi7ux1rtovOHddL872FznpcJBNu01xJPr6X0Qdk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Fri,=2030=20Jan=202015=2013:23:58=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-questi ons@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Perfomance=20counter=20tool|Refer ences:=20|In-Reply-To:=20; b=AEVCWoKAEdvl3xCPxlAGQbxQ+hEDBt64TUPXJ+YyvGYuGWLVZ4sx9h7BOct2/ExjD FTCT8fi9ne2wnLlJr7u081oMK5XUApCxLpv2jyh4xsUTw8KwDNZmrW6CL+BHbK+Z5F x4f1qad2f40XcnYBNwGr9TGqF2Gku4OC/T1ZDy8E= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <54CB85EE.2060301@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:23:58 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Perfomance counter tool References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NTriKB4oassWiQoC7W2qjudqvXEf6kV9d" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 13:24:07 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --NTriKB4oassWiQoC7W2qjudqvXEf6kV9d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/30/15 13:04, Sai Prajeeth wrote: > I am not sure if this has been asked before but does FreeBSD have any t= ool > to measure performance counters like Linux's 'Perf' ? Some command line= > tool that can spit out the IPC of the system or something like that? pmcstat(8) dtrace(1) -- see also https://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace Cheers, Matthew --NTriKB4oassWiQoC7W2qjudqvXEf6kV9d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUy4XuXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnSMsQAKrtKmEV3sA8Am268jx+FAxc Z5L+cbuxpqMUaO+htHl77L0/E9pV5WgsIyVEJuvJM1REHA4DJnGqhaq8Nh5w8eQd 8MdTnfsBlFuDarLtUI+IBr9nBsDr4jSx1mhYAsHd2derukFB8ro1xRJoEZFHS8Ch EBHS9jdH2nrdSasFyl6aHaTN8fOGJshD9AXDicme0gYqtBGOVUOP70rx6arIhAso PuAcNhtYFPevYngmr2htR8UVCLwYa5NDZfPnOBL4rRYsbns3aNCzgjgcjA2BfdzK AxfNpXow1GdnANndLN4UqSCF8eKmZJWjFhHBO8JbFAINQ243MsZ/4gdyy3w0QD2G uu/TrUXx5WaRLTNZQPqE8RgeAuLpGz3UGLsm4dZDiVYYSccR7qdHqD+yWdcO6DUW m4TJz8KrZsopjYk9/Bqk9nNoY83UlDgCuM/Pl+RyqOa+FfvmjMLEztp4C2UluiPm ySCMbi0Jz+FMlyaOLqCVt3YBmk6Jm+EXjEok1WEn3DMYQrQs3HAlbUQtJ6cgqPeh WDUlcPk5dwTh9X8fCkNyoezKng7mr6SxE659Uc5oM7VEK+2XgiKNkj1UzF3ttrOz 18WdR0So9skmQG3GnPk1vkYideaMSEKCfzFlBoBjFzEz8fx4cpSZowYJVeF6Ofwf h4FJ3gPCTzeP/qsLhPtc =n6Eo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NTriKB4oassWiQoC7W2qjudqvXEf6kV9d-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 14:46:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5D5C4ED for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x232.google.com (mail-we0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D9F63B3 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:46:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f178.google.com with SMTP id k48so27528827wev.9 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:46:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ClkHOJjKyG6O4ZkRvebnQViqAUo8oDYbNdvsfux/kRM=; b=a3LP0VHVKjL5doJ8XdNW6y/xHOkU/62NP30gYts2S6knSDOkc4lZHcmrwgYUyQs/aN MoIZIOy6VZt8vLlKpicBLXjqznXZRMGOVSedJKv7QzQ825RMM6fpPZciidtyZtOgOBlT aKlTgkvLFYa4APpEj6o9Q5MnAFHkO3BDG71tZ++N9bbDQlFuH8Zc7drpyM6Noz666SZt 0ITqy+KaA3mnFbDftnMjzbAlLam7CAtoJbn+pB23DLETpVndOVKfQsRvR1rgGsoaAZgJ ReLBKXm/BdLF/TJm13UUuuKPQIloUJXSkt8HHcN3Dp2xTyCJcfXpg2UHat0t9t2+GkaB +U5w== X-Received: by 10.194.200.68 with SMTP id jq4mr6259636wjc.128.1422629210974; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:46:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from Marc-Thinkpad (AOrleans-656-1-128-26.w92-152.abo.wanadoo.fr. [92.152.71.26]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id e18sm15219445wjz.27.2015.01.30.06.46.49 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 30 Jan 2015 06:46:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:46:48 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?TcOkcms=?= Owen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: PXE server to boot linux system Message-ID: <20150130154648.2ad757ff@Marc-Thinkpad> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 14:46:53 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to setup a FreeBSD system as a TFTP server which would allow me to boot a Ubuntu root partition on the network. All the documentation I've found either concerns FreeBSD as both client and server or a FreeBSD server booting installation ISOs. I don't want to boot ISO images, I want to boot a real linux system on the network. Is that possible? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 16:40:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCA26AF7 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:40:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rr-iv.baywinds.org (50-196-187-251-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.196.187.251]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3DAD2F3 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:40:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.0.2.130] (rr-iii.baywinds.org [192.0.2.130]) by rr-iv.baywinds.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id t0UGNE38002167 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:23:15 -0800 Message-ID: <54CBAFF2.9000808@baywinds.org> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 08:23:14 -0800 From: Bruce Ferrell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PXE server to boot linux system References: <20150130154648.2ad757ff@Marc-Thinkpad> In-Reply-To: <20150130154648.2ad757ff@Marc-Thinkpad> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:40:14 -0000 On 01/30/2015 06:46 AM, Märk Owen wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to setup a FreeBSD system as a TFTP server which would allow > me to boot a Ubuntu root partition on the network. All the > documentation I've found either concerns FreeBSD as both client and > server or a FreeBSD server booting installation ISOs. > > I don't want to boot ISO images, I want to boot a real linux system on > the network. Is that possible? > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I'm relatively certain dhcp and tftp aren't different freebsd to linux, so what you need to do is configure dhpc/tftp and properly place the pxelinux.0 file on the tftp server, then place either a specif pxelinux config file per the instructions in the link below https://help.ubuntu.com/community/DisklessUbuntuHowto From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 19:23:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07F33B70 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:23:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hindenburg.barfooze.de (smtp6.barfooze.de [IPv6:2001:bc8:397c:500::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "", Issuer "" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85F5CC2D for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:23:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hindenburg.barfooze.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hindenburg.barfooze.de (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t0UJNpa0040616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:23:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mw@hindenburg.barfooze.de) Received: (from mw@localhost) by hindenburg.barfooze.de (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id t0UJNpGA040615 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:23:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mw) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:23:51 +0100 From: Moritz Wilhelmy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: dump(8) file format Message-ID: <20150130192351.GR16100@barfooze.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:23:57 -0000 Hello, Just wondering: Is there any documentation regarding the format of FFS dumps generated by dump(8)? I'd be interested in poking around in my disk dumps with a perl script or something. --- Perhaps one could even write a fuse file system that can union-mount multiple layers of FFS dumps read-only? Best, Moritz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 19:51:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E2E0BB for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from remote.thehowies.com (50-197-91-217-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.197.91.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "remote.thehowies.com", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09299ED9 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PRIMARY.thehowies.local ([fe80::967:7eb6:ee49:3820]) by PRIMARY.thehowies.local ([fe80::967:7eb6:ee49:3820%11]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:49:51 -0800 From: John Howie To: Moritz Wilhelmy , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: dump(8) file format Thread-Topic: dump(8) file format Thread-Index: AQHQPMJPMxTOMhDi6ECxAYfu2Y7smpzZEkwA Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:49:50 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20150130192351.GR16100@barfooze.de> In-Reply-To: <20150130192351.GR16100@barfooze.de> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/15.6.0.150113 x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.23] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <600D344009CD4B438D7FA4F207CD795F@thehowies.local> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:51:01 -0000 SGkgTW9yaXR6LA0KDQpUcnk6IG1hbiA1IGR1bXBmaWxlDQoNClJlZ2FyZHMsDQoNCkpvaG4NCg0K DQoNCg0KDQpPbiAxLzMwLzE1LCAxMToyMyBBTSwgIk1vcml0eiBXaWxoZWxteSIgPG1vcml0ekB3 emZmLmRlPiB3cm90ZToNCg0KPkhlbGxvLA0KPg0KPkp1c3Qgd29uZGVyaW5nOiBJcyB0aGVyZSBh bnkgZG9jdW1lbnRhdGlvbiByZWdhcmRpbmcgdGhlIGZvcm1hdCBvZiBGRlMNCj5kdW1wcyBnZW5l cmF0ZWQgYnkgZHVtcCg4KT8NCj4NCj5JJ2QgYmUgaW50ZXJlc3RlZCBpbiBwb2tpbmcgYXJvdW5k IGluIG15IGRpc2sgZHVtcHMgd2l0aCBhIHBlcmwgc2NyaXB0DQo+b3Igc29tZXRoaW5nLiAtLS0g UGVyaGFwcyBvbmUgY291bGQgZXZlbiB3cml0ZSBhIGZ1c2UgZmlsZSBzeXN0ZW0gdGhhdCANCj5j YW4gdW5pb24tbW91bnQgbXVsdGlwbGUgbGF5ZXJzIG9mIEZGUyBkdW1wcyByZWFkLW9ubHk/DQo+ DQo+DQo+QmVzdCwNCj4NCj5Nb3JpdHoNCj5fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KPmZyZWVic2QtcXVlc3Rpb25zQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnIG1haWxpbmcg bGlzdA0KPmh0dHA6Ly9saXN0cy5mcmVlYnNkLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL2ZyZWVic2Qt cXVlc3Rpb25zDQo+VG8gdW5zdWJzY3JpYmUsIHNlbmQgYW55IG1haWwgdG8gDQo+ImZyZWVic2Qt cXVlc3Rpb25zLXVuc3Vic2NyaWJlQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnIg0K From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 19:55:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8E7318F for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hindenburg.barfooze.de (smtp6.barfooze.de [IPv6:2001:bc8:397c:500::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "", Issuer "" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4928FF0F for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hindenburg.barfooze.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hindenburg.barfooze.de (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t0UJtZjv041228 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:55:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mw@hindenburg.barfooze.de) Received: (from mw@localhost) by hindenburg.barfooze.de (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id t0UJtZEd041227; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:55:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mw) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:55:35 +0100 From: Moritz Wilhelmy To: John Howie Subject: Re: dump(8) file format Message-ID: <20150130195535.GS16100@barfooze.de> References: <20150130192351.GR16100@barfooze.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:55:39 -0000 Hi John, On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 19:49:50 +0000, John Howie wrote: > Hi Moritz, > > Try: man 5 dumpfile > On my FreeBSD 10.0 machine there is no such manpage, and the SEE ALSO section in the dump(8) manual page does not mention anything like it, hence the question. $ man 5 dumpfile No manual entry for dumpfile $ man 5 dump No manual entry for dump $ man -k dumpfile dumpfile: nothing appropriate Best regards, Moritz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 19:59:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB4B3252 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:59:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from remote.thehowies.com (50-197-91-217-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.197.91.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "remote.thehowies.com", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97233F3F for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:59:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PRIMARY.thehowies.local ([fe80::967:7eb6:ee49:3820]) by PRIMARY.thehowies.local ([fe80::967:7eb6:ee49:3820%11]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 11:59:01 -0800 From: John Howie To: Moritz Wilhelmy Subject: Re: dump(8) file format Thread-Topic: dump(8) file format Thread-Index: AQHQPMJPMxTOMhDi6ECxAYfu2Y7smpzZEkwAgACHt4D//3rYAA== Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:59:00 +0000 Message-ID: <83921816-8258-41A7-B42F-0C358DD45ABD@thehowies.com> References: <20150130192351.GR16100@barfooze.de> <20150130195535.GS16100@barfooze.de> In-Reply-To: <20150130195535.GS16100@barfooze.de> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/15.6.0.150113 x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.23] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:59:51 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 19:59:02 -0000 SGkgTW9yaXR6LA0KDQpCQ2PigJlpbmcgZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnMuDQoNCkJpemFycmUuIEl0 IGlzIGluIHRoZSBIVE1MIG1hbiBwYWdlcyBvbiBmcmVlYnNkLm9yZy4gSXQgaXMgbm90IHRydWx5 IG11Y2ggDQpoZWxwIC0gaXQganVzdCBnaXZlcyB5b3UgYW4gb3ZlcnZpZXcuDQoNCkhhdmUgeW91 IHRyaWVkIGxvb2tpbmcgYXQgdGhlIHNvdXJjZSBjb2RlLCB1bmRlciAvdXNyL3NyYz8NCg0KUmVn YXJkcywNCg0KSm9obg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCk9uIDEvMzAvMTUsIDExOjU1IEFNLCAiTW9yaXR6IFdp bGhlbG15IiA8bW9yaXR6QHd6ZmYuZGU+IHdyb3RlOg0KDQo+SGkgSm9obiwNCj4NCj5PbiBGcmks IEphbiAzMCwgMjAxNSBhdCAxOTo0OTo1MCArMDAwMCwgSm9obiBIb3dpZSB3cm90ZToNCj4+IEhp IE1vcml0eiwNCj4+IA0KPj4gVHJ5OiBtYW4gNSBkdW1wZmlsZQ0KPj4gDQo+DQo+T24gbXkgRnJl ZUJTRCAxMC4wIG1hY2hpbmUgdGhlcmUgaXMgbm8gc3VjaCBtYW5wYWdlLCBhbmQgdGhlIFNFRSBB TFNPDQo+c2VjdGlvbiBpbiB0aGUgZHVtcCg4KSBtYW51YWwgcGFnZSBkb2VzIG5vdCBtZW50aW9u IGFueXRoaW5nIGxpa2UgaXQsDQo+aGVuY2UgdGhlIHF1ZXN0aW9uLg0KPg0KPiQgbWFuIDUgZHVt cGZpbGUNCj5ObyBtYW51YWwgZW50cnkgZm9yIGR1bXBmaWxlDQo+JCBtYW4gNSBkdW1wDQo+Tm8g bWFudWFsIGVudHJ5IGZvciBkdW1wDQo+JCBtYW4gLWsgZHVtcGZpbGUNCj5kdW1wZmlsZTogbm90 aGluZyBhcHByb3ByaWF0ZQ0KPg0KPg0KPkJlc3QgcmVnYXJkcywNCj4NCj5Nb3JpdHoNCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 23:10:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12154CA for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 23:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (ns.dreamchaser.org [66.109.141.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB7035E3 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 23:10:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [192.168.151.122]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id t0UMms2n000692 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:48:54 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <54CC0A56.8050503@dreamchaser.org> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:48:54 -0700 From: Gary Aitken Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: /etc/make.conf PERL_VERSION Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [192.168.151.101]); Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:48:54 -0700 (MST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 23:10:38 -0000 Looking at my /etc/make.conf, I see it has the following: # added by use.perl 2013-08-03 12:47:28 PERL_VERSION=5.14.4 Yet the installed version is 5.16 $pkg info | grep perl perl5.16-5.16.3_18 It appears this was added by one of the build scripts; does it serve any purpose / cause problems if out of sync with the actual installed version? Thanks, Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 31 00:22:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B9277F7 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 00:22:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09B57D95 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 00:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id l61so29847991wev.8 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:22:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=s1Ro27ZvzziHLXEhAlRNy0h6WdlhI63q3M6PJab1vmU=; b=nYCaeyADUOPG1iuK8RUNpXZLYYU4M4/rVBN8ugo1D8zGZk/uimukNkbnKfz4kbH4e2 iAkO/l67b3Y18eWsGsWiISSkbZyoJRa/1CZXjCOtw8eq+m9IDYUuqt6msXwwisjL4F3l +eojkiIVPiVFKoeVc8hqnISKZfDsoLDcfJs6zcPITOT5yvkARzwztLsGvKlXiJgocG9j iEhqAQOMqpD1lHrWouJ/6QFZD5Kt0cJM/QmvT3+H4NQycq9LVfS9yptE9osbTk7Bm7Pm 1jjEyEtTtxcMI8BxLegNYF/zTL2DLes2RCQw6i9DdclKHWMpjxypvmdlSh8Kb4L3AzvZ 3lHg== X-Received: by 10.180.93.226 with SMTP id cx2mr197313wib.63.1422663743990; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:22:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.35.135 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 16:22:03 -0800 (PST) From: Maurizio De Santis Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 01:22:03 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: etcupdate bootstrapping fails with "make: don't know how to make distrib-dirs. Stop" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 00:22:26 -0000 Hello, I'm trying to bootstrap etcupdate without success. This is what I'm doing: root@host:~ # etcupdate extract -L log.txt Failed to build new tree. root@host:~ # cat log.txt >>> extract command: tarball= >>> Building tree at /var/db/etcupdate/current with make make: don't know how to make distrib-dirs. Stop make: stopped in /usr/src root@host:~ # Am I doing anything wrong? Thank you -- Maurizio De Santis From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 31 05:58:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 592E7FD5 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 05:58:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1396BF1E for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 05:58:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-61-84.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.61.84]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B567E3CCBB; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:52:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t0V5qmhB002112; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:52:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 06:52:48 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Moritz Wilhelmy Subject: Re: dump(8) file format Message-Id: <20150131065248.d1c295f9.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20150130192351.GR16100@barfooze.de> References: <20150130192351.GR16100@barfooze.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 05:58:58 -0000 On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 20:23:51 +0100, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote: > Hello, > > Just wondering: Is there any documentation regarding the format of FFS > dumps generated by dump(8)? The source code provides documentation. Have a look at the contents of /usr/src/sbin/dump as well as of /usr/src/sbin/restore. You could say that the file /usr/src/sbin/restore/restore.h has a "file format description" of dump files. > I'd be interested in poking around in my disk dumps with a perl script > or something. --- Perhaps one could even write a fuse file system that > can union-mount multiple layers of FFS dumps read-only? That sounds a bit complicated, as the files are, if I remember correctly, sequencial files, so you'd probably have to "preprocess" the whole file. Note that it's not a file archive, but a file _system_ dump. But maybe obtaining "header informations" is sufficient for some imaginable purposes? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...