From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 00:48:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B47FD761 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 00:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x230.google.com (mail-we0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4770DDEC for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 00:48:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id p10so8813947wes.7 for ; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 16:48:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/oNhkarbKId+7IH2DmW+hR3MWU9SQrgPRr5XEgPExk0=; b=UZrLZn6W9mZYsUBjQWkalKLd+VP8lT2HxWhgV8YO/UFSI28856BTXsZqCJH9OSLAE0 Zdsn9w9fdK7LXzSv1OMqHKv+1WDOTK5yxI6QWFHLMVgrSy4Sdd9LdNkrmJTnHn29ZN9x DwWE18b2ueVvPtPz8jSyHGrKqsKO/hX+49Btem/mmzprTlufq+r+NtX8lxtooox9X648 SwkbTUCD2ZzTkqh0uTfpobT6H80T8CZvJWoW9A06rfVyv9A37aiw6e0wTjYU2/kjp2HD KBEKXeRRIzC3c+fhGQ3/f5+Gjd51l4P/8xxRXi6zkXBD5WGLv7zaaoLbc1WvwIRKFPNU AGSg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.79.131 with SMTP id j3mr10226169wix.33.1423356533354; Sat, 07 Feb 2015 16:48:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.241.132 with HTTP; Sat, 7 Feb 2015 16:48:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 08:48:53 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Unable to boot after upgrade to 10.1-RELEASE From: Ben Woods To: Manas Bhatnagar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 00:48:55 -0000 I'm no expert in kernel debugging, but this looks like the issue described in /usr/src/UPDATING entry 20121223 and explained in the second bullet point here: https://www.freebsd.org/releases/10.1R/errata.html#open-issues Are you on i386 (32 bit as opposed to amd64 64 bit)? Are you running a multi-disk ZFS (mirror or raidz)? If so, the GENERIC kernel used in FreeBSD 10.1 will not work for you, and you will need to build a custom kernel with options KSTACK_PAGES=4 Regards, Ben On Sunday, February 8, 2015, Manas Bhatnagar wrote: > Hello, > > I tried to update a 10.0-RELEASE system to 10.1-RELEASE. > I am running ZFS + GELI on root. > This is what I see after rebooting: > http://i.imgur.com/1IGpHa3.png > Any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Manas > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org " > -- -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 05:19:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 800C5CC for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 05:19:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17485929 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 05:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp118-210-122-88.lns20.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([118.210.122.88]) by ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 08 Feb 2015 15:49:52 +1030 Message-ID: <54D6F1F7.6050107@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 15:49:51 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arthur Chance , "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW script that supports some kind of rc.d directory? References: <54D5EC86.6050806@qeng-ho.org> In-Reply-To: <54D5EC86.6050806@qeng-ho.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 05:19:59 -0000 On 07/02/2015 21:14, Arthur Chance wrote: > On 07/02/2015 10:02, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> This seems like the kind of thing that people have needed often enough >> -- for example when you want to have specific ipfw rules for specific >> installed services, and your ipfw config to be multiple files loaded in >> some kind of order, but my google-fu is failing me. >> >> Failing that, I know FreeBSD has some rcorder, which might be usable for >> this, but I don't know if it's extensible to a whole separate class of >> things (or if trying to do that is overkill). >> >> Is this a problem someone else has had/solved before? >> > > I've no idea if someone has already done this, but the final form of > ipfw in the manual is > > ipfw [-cfnNqS] [-p preproc [preproc-flags]] pathname > > Using cpp as the preprocessor (or maybe m4 if you're a quote loving > masochist :-) would let you use #include or the equivalent. That's not > quite up what you're asking, but a start. m4 with syscmd and (s)include > would go further. > > I think the major problem would be if different sets of rules had to be > interleaved. That would require a careful choice of rule numbering. > In /etc/rc.conf you can specify firewall_script="/etc/rc.firewall" - rc.firewall is the system example of ipfw setup. As /etc/rc.firewall is a shell script you can pull in any other files you want. The example includes /etc/defaults/rc.conf and /etc/rc.conf to get variables that it uses. You could set up yours to ls a specific dir and suckup all the files in it. -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing Shane Ambler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 07:55:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C562BBE for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 07:55:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU004-OMC4S9.hotmail.com (blu004-omc4s9.hotmail.com [65.55.111.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 532AE869 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 07:55:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU436-SMTP258 ([65.55.111.135]) by BLU004-OMC4S9.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22751); Sat, 7 Feb 2015 23:53:24 -0800 X-TMN: [b2k9pl3Z+h9tOSIZCbp6O+5qsT4E3aI/] X-Originating-Email: [bourne.identity@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 13:23:12 +0530 From: Manish Jain User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freeb >> User Questions" Subject: why does tar archive directory differently based on command line? X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 150207-1, 07-02-2015), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Feb 2015 07:53:21.0921 (UTC) FILETIME=[4F493710:01D04374] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 07:55:36 -0000 Hi, I am having problems trying to understand why does tar archive differently with the following 2 commands, presuming xyz is a sub-directory : tar -c -f - ./xyz | gzip > xyz.tar.gz//xyz nested one level under . and .. tar -c -f - xyz | gzip > xyz.tar.gz//no . or .. With the first invocation, I get a top-level nesting that just has . and .. With the second, I get a top-level nesting that has xyz, which is much preferable The first invocation leads to an absurdity that you have to cd into . (sounds recursively impossible) to actually get to xyz Thanks for any help. -- Regards, Manish Jain +91-98995-82709 --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 14:59:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 478FD949; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 14:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x231.google.com (mail-ig0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CA8220B; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 14:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f177.google.com with SMTP id z20so11641460igj.4; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 06:59:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=q0ybmrFalyIrFK+/UJZ0Vzsfsz9574ILkGjUiPgkDYA=; b=vPytLl1pnSIjOaUMwQWEBLI+bSBUC3GOHqAuLoBhWJUL5ZEmgj6PlFraCeauf+qgwX GXLtwBrG4InH65F0zayTPFv9V7pm2jVsaxV7Bxrfi8peg0Qa81exorRuMPTlnaSczUrC tInmLRyJYuaDcObcTodp18AwjzIwXd9mIzShevR3bHVU9e+fSg+mgncmDO0HAF00aJf7 SbI8103uawANixlwDTADg4Bfik1n9zITsx7nW7D+NYKnceAHuVzUpDAwsutv2QQl99tT IMGkbrV6QYoAan6kdlrN8ktn6EMFC3IUok3Wq/PMb/EdTPjkt1a+9Jwfa1tz9LpjQJd5 +h5Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.9.91 with SMTP id j88mr21020375ioi.91.1423407568374; Sun, 08 Feb 2015 06:59:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.240.36 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 06:59:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 15:59:28 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: HTTPS/TLS issue on a NDIS wrapped NIC From: Simone Lombardo To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 14:59:29 -0000 Hi Adrian, thanks for the reply. I have not seen other side effect other than cited ones. it works fine also with various P2P and FTP protocols for instance. I have probed the interface with netstat -id but the dropped and error packet counters sign 0, so it doesn't seem explicity droppped by the if_ndis module. I guess further investigations requires a demo web server to check if it is the remote peer to discard packets or the nic is falsely reporting their transmission. Is there any sysctl or debug feature you know to check if it discarded by the local upper layers? Thanks, Simone 2015-02-07 17:30 GMT+01:00 Adrian Chadd : > .. or if that isn't breaking things, maybe there's some packet > corruption going on that triggers encryption failures? Normally a > corrupted packet would just be dropped by some part of the stack. > > > -adrian > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 8 17:57:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB7A2A37 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 17:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A207F641 for ; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 17:57:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8CE33C1D; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 12:57:21 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id B68C83980F; Sun, 8 Feb 2015 12:57:20 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Manish Jain Subject: Re: why does tar archive directory differently based on command line? References: Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 12:57:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Manish Jain's message of "Sun, 8 Feb 2015 13:23:12 +0530") Message-ID: <44bnl4qoan.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 17:57:27 -0000 Manish Jain writes: > I am having problems trying to understand why does tar archive > differently with the following 2 commands, presuming xyz is a > sub-directory : > > tar -c -f - ./xyz | gzip > xyz.tar.gz//xyz nested one level under . and .. > tar -c -f - xyz | gzip > xyz.tar.gz//no . or .. > > With the first invocation, I get a top-level nesting that just has . and .. > With the second, I get a top-level nesting that has xyz, which is much > preferable Right. tar(1) stores the path to the file. This is essential functionality, so if you want a particular path stored, you provide that path in the way you invoke tar in the first place. > The first invocation leads to an absurdity that you have to cd into > . (sounds recursively impossible) to actually get to xyz It's neither absurd nor recursively impossible (whatever that means). If you were planning to extract the tar file from one level higher up the destination tree, it would be exactly what you would want. Perhaps you would be happier with a GUI application for creating your tar files. There are many fine choices, and you probably have one (or more) already installed on your system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 03:53:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1531BB13 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 03:53:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.umail10.cn4e.com (umail10.cn4e.com [219.239.95.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED91D33 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 03:52:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smail116.cn4e.com (smail116.cn4e.com [124.202.153.116]) by mail.umail10.cn4e.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73ABDFE4487 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:52:58 +0800 (CST) X-Bordeaux-Score: 550 X-Spam-Flag: NO Received: from localhost([180.173.154.98]) by smail116.cn4e.com(5.0.0.3a) with ESMTP id 398C040A0006.46.1423453978.75008; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:52:58 +0800 (CST) X-BQId: 398C040A0006.46.1423453978.75008.1 X-Bordeaux-Type: AUTHSMTP X-35BMId: 398C040A0006.46.1423453978.75008.1 X-Bordeaux-LOG: SA: TSMF, 3-550-1-83886336,3-550-1-83886336,3-550-1-83886336 eJzt2ctOwkAUBmA2ulFfwNUsdcE45S4xBqhFCIUhMCZuh2G4JKWjnTbhUV34Br6BK9vYhWkiYUO H6Pma5iTNWfy7v9OeFL5d3ryxn9Omo5FjM2Q1CLbqZWxVK/i2UQD/xPseO3rD155l1bDwKxILtU HOdMjGqKOCueTRtlWuXlUxia8yvz54YgBA3k7Tme0Pp+dS5CrBvZ7SobF4wJDPPXbo4OAxAABH7 Cyd2f5oP7Eeculjf2QsGjDoI75LuI7Jjp12FK6kH64FD9fKRzoSQmq9iLy8QgIAjDpPZ7Y/hu2+ i7oTOmyiuw33+VIGpNYSflGGUqySjxX3xjKDw0vOHzzug5cdZ88SIaSUWyIAwLG5SGe2Pyb2mCF G4/ZYBFLO9Lz4GkmdvGfqVjd+0pk+YBUsoUT+qKQ/JnbTeWa/79ABkttQBj73UPIrZKa2ueUDAJ j3BdK5Xng= X-Bordeaux-Detail: eJxzsrIKjgwOcfW1snIGI0MDYysrE3MrK1MDLidMSRMrKyMDEEaR9YDIGhpaWVkCZY1RZYHIEaz FwAgoZ2WlkVeak6OJZrofyHQgAFLmMCUAqLwmTg== X-Bordeaux-Action-libantispam.so: Action: Relay[NEXT,10000,550:550:550] X-Bordeaux-Action-libspamsa.so: X-Bordeaux-Action-libclamav.so: X-Bordeaux-Action-libsmtpext.so: Message-ID: <863189197378A2CC0A3C17A8E071F2C3149D8EC75@CN-ETECH.COM> From: "Helen" Reply-To: To: Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:49:44 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Joinf MailSystem 8.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 03:53:00 -0000 RGVhciBteSBmcmllbmQ7DQpHb29kIGRheS4NClRoaXMgaXMgSGVsZW4gZnJvbSBFemxpZmUgQ28u LCBMdGQsIGVzdGFibGlzaGVkIGluIDIwMDMuDQpJIGtub3cgeW91IGZyb20gdGhlIGludGVybmV0 Lg0KV2UgYXJlIG9uZSBvZiB0aGUgbGVhZGluZyBjb21wYW5pZXMgaW4gcmVzZWFyY2ggJmRldmVs b3BtZW50LCBwcm9kdWN0aW9uIGFuZCBzYWxlcyBvZiBib2R5IHdhcm1lciwgaGFuZCB3YXJtZXIs IGZvb3Qgd2FybWVyLCB0b2Ugd2FybWVyLCBoZWF0aW5nLCBsaWZlIGdpZnQgcHJvZHVjdHMgaW4g Q2hpbmEuIA0KV2UgaGF2ZSAxMDAgd29ya2VycyBhbmQgYW5udWFsIHByb2R1Y3Rpb24gY2FwYWNp dHkgb2YgbGlmZSBwcm9kdWN0cyBoYXMgcmVhY2hlZCAxNTAsIDAwMCwgMDAwIHBpZWNlcy4NCldl IGhhdmUgZGlmZmVyZW50IGFzc2VtYmx5IGxpbmVzIHRoYXQgYXJlIHN1cGVydmlzZWQgYW5kIG1h bmFnZWQgYnkgcHJvZmVzc2lvbmFsIGRlc2lnbmVycyBhbmQgbWFuYWdlcnMuDQpPdXIgYWltIGlz IHRvIG1ha2UgeW91ciBsaWZlIGVhc3kgYW5kIGhhcHB5IHdpdGggaGlnaCB0ZWNobm9sb2d5Lg0K T3VyIHByb2R1Y3RzIGhhcyBiZWVuIGF3YXJkZWQgd2l0aCBDaGluZXNlLCBVU0EsIEdlcm1hbnks IGV0YyAtICBjZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9ucy4NCldlIHN0aWxsIG1ha2UgZWZmb3J0cyB0byBzdGVhZGls eSBwcm9ncmVzc2lvbiBhbmQgY3JlYXRpb24gb2YgbmV3IHByb2R1Y3RzLg0KV2UgcHJvdmlkZSBo aWdoIHF1YWxpdHkgcHJvZHVjdCB3aXRoIGNvbXBldGl0aXZlIHByaWNlIGFuZCBwcm9mZXNzaW9u YWwgc2VydmljZS4NCkZyZWUgc2FtcGxlIGlzIGZvciB5b3VyIHRlc3RpbmcgLg0KDQoNCkNvdWxk IHlvdSBnaXZlIHVzIGEgY2hhbmNlIHRvIHNlcnZlIHlvdSBpbiBjb2xvciwgY2F0Y2hlciwgc3Bv cnQgdG93ZWwsIGRhaWx5IGxpZmUgcHJvZHVjdHM/DQpMb29raW5nIGZvcndhcmQgIHRvIHlvdXIg a2luZGx5IHJlcGx5Lg0KDQoNCkJlc3QgUmVnYXJkcyENCj09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0NCkhlbGVuIFpoYW5n IA0KU2hhbmdoYWkgRXpsaWZlIENvLiBMdGQNCkFkZDogTm8uNDc5IENodW5kb25nIHJvYWQsTWlu aGFuZyBkaXN0cmljdCwgU2hhbmdoYWkgMjAxMTA4LCBDaGluYQ0KVGVsOjAwODYgMjE1NDcxMDAx MC04MDY3DQpGYXg6MDA4NiAyMSA2MTI5IDQ3NzkNCk1vYihWaWJlci9XaGF0c2FwcCk6IDAwODYg MTU4MDE3OTUwOTQNClNreXBlIElEOiBzaC5zZmZpbHRlY2gzDQpFbWFpbDogc2FsZXMyQGV6bGlm ZWNuLmNvbQ== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 09:54:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3C6B506 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 09:54:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-nf-106.his.com (smtp-nf-106.his.com [216.194.251.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CFC890 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 09:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cuda201.his.com (cuda201.his.com [216.194.248.226]) by smtp-nf-106.his.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D8D860C57 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 04:54:06 -0500 (EST) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1423475645-061c410fdc1f36b0001-jLrpzn Received: from smtp-nf-202.his.com (smtp-nf-202.his.com [216.194.248.252]) by cuda201.his.com with ESMTP id uxCwFuJlXXarT4jn; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 04:54:05 -0500 (EST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: tom@invisible-island.net X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 216.194.248.252 Received: from mail-sterling.his.com (mail-sterling.his.com [216.194.248.141]) by smtp-nf-202.his.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77750600B2; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 04:54:05 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail-sterling.his.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A1A3F80002; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 04:54:04 -0500 (EST) X-Barracuda-RBL-Trusted-Forwarder: 216.194.248.141 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail-sterling.his.com Received: from mail-sterling.his.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail-sterling.his.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UOkTRTp6w-Df; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 04:54:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from aerie (pool-71-178-218-187.washdc.fios.verizon.net [71.178.218.187]) by mail-sterling.his.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1C553F80001; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 04:54:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from tom by aerie with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1YKl2b-00006b-4s; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 04:54:05 -0500 X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 71.178.218.187 Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 04:54:05 -0500 From: Thomas Dickey To: Matthias Apitz , Thomas Dickey , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: key Shift+Prior not working for scroll-up in xterm but in urxvt Message-ID: <20150209095405.GA32691@aerie.jexium-island.net> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: key Shift+Prior not working for scroll-up in xterm but in urxvt Reply-To: dickey@his.com References: <20150206081525.GA1828@c720-r276659> <20150206092525.GA3070@aerie.jexium-island.net> <20150206130348.GA2764@c720-r276659> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150206130348.GA2764@c720-r276659> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Barracuda-Connect: smtp-nf-202.his.com[216.194.248.252] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1423475645 X-Barracuda-URL: https://spam.his.com:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi Received-SPF: none (his.com: tom@invisible-island.net does not designate permitted sender hosts) X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at his.com X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=7.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.15071 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:54:26 -0000 --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 02:03:48PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El d=C3=ADa Friday, February 06, 2015 a las 04:25:25AM -0500, Thomas Dick= ey escribi=C3=B3: >=20 > > > I run this 11C on a small netbook (Acer C720) which does not have phy= sical > > > keys for PG_UP/DOWN; that's why I use xmodmap to define=20 > > >=20 > > > Mode_switch + UP --> Prior > > > Mdee_switch + Down --> Next > > >=20 > > > xmodmap -e "keycode 98 =3D Up Up Prior" > > > xmodmap -e "keycode 104 =3D Down Down Next" > > >=20 > > > When I now do in the terminal urxvt holding down both Mode_switch and > > > Shift, it scrolls fine with the Up and Down keys as expected: the > > > terminal window is scrolled up and down. > > >=20 > > > When I do the same, the key is delivered to the xterm itself and I can > > > see them, for example, with 'od -c' as: > > >=20 > > > $ od -c > > > ^[[5;2~^[[5;2~ > > > ^[[6;2~^[[6;2~ > > > 0000000 033 [ 5 ; 2 ~ 033 [ 5 ; 2 ~ \n 033 [ = 6 > > > 0000020 ; 2 ~ 033 [ 6 ; 2 ~ \n = =20 > > > 0000032 > > >=20 > > > The 033 [ 5 ; 2 ~ for Up and the 033 [ 6 ; 2 ~ for down. > > >=20 > > > Why this does not work in xterm? > >=20 > > That depends on what you want it to do (you did not say). >=20 > I think, I said what I want: that with Mode_switch+Shift+Up/Down it does > scrolling in xterm as it does in uRxvt. >=20 > I followed your hints an tried configurations in the file > ~/.Xdefaults-hostname: >=20 > *VT100.translations: #override \ > ShiftUp: scroll-back(1,page) \n\ > ShiftDown: scroll-forw(1,page) \n\ > ShiftF9: string("hola") >=20 > (the last line for F9 is only to see if the file works at all). >=20 > With the above config it now scrolls in xterm with Shift-Up/Down. But > I'm unable to configure that it scrolls with Mode_switch+Shift+Up/Down > and I want to have this to use the same key sequence in xterm and uRxvt > and not always have to think where I am. >=20 > Any idea? Thanks not immediately: my keyboard does not have a mode_switch key (unless I tinker with xmodmap...). But here's a guess: Xt's translations don't know about mode_switch as such, so a fix is likely to be in xmodmap. While xmodmap's manpage is vague about the recognized modifiers, mentioning them by name only once: clear MODIFIERNAME This removes all entries in the modifier map for the given m= od=E2=80=90 ifier, where valid name are: Shift, Lock, Control, Mod1, Mo= d2, Mod3, Mod4, and Mod5 (case does not matter in modifier nam= es, although it does matter for all other names). For examp= le, ``clear Lock'' will remove all any keys that were bound to = the shift lock modifier. The source code for the xmodmap program does not have a table of these name= s. That is in the library. The library defines this table: static ModifierRec modifiers[] =3D { {"Shift", 0, ParseModImmed,ShiftMask}, {"Lock", 0, ParseModImmed,LockMask}, {"Ctrl", 0, ParseModImmed,ControlMask}, {"Mod1", 0, ParseModImmed,Mod1Mask}, {"Mod2", 0, ParseModImmed,Mod2Mask}, {"Mod3", 0, ParseModImmed,Mod3Mask}, {"Mod4", 0, ParseModImmed,Mod4Mask}, {"Mod5", 0, ParseModImmed,Mod5Mask}, {"Meta", 0, ParseModSym, XK_Meta_L}, {"m", 0, ParseModSym, XK_Meta_L}, {"h", 0, ParseModSym, XK_Hyper_L}, {"su", 0, ParseModSym, XK_Super_L}, {"a", 0, ParseModSym, XK_Alt_L}, {"Hyper", 0, ParseModSym, XK_Hyper_L}, {"Super", 0, ParseModSym, XK_Super_L}, {"Alt", 0, ParseModSym, XK_Alt_L}, {"Button1", 0, ParseModImmed,Button1Mask}, {"Button2", 0, ParseModImmed,Button2Mask}, {"Button3", 0, ParseModImmed,Button3Mask}, {"Button4", 0, ParseModImmed,Button4Mask}, {"Button5", 0, ParseModImmed,Button5Mask}, {"c", 0, ParseModImmed,ControlMask}, {"s", 0, ParseModImmed,ShiftMask}, {"l", 0, ParseModImmed,LockMask}, }; and also in the library it treats the mode-switch specially (without naming it): InitialI.h:307: Modifiers mode_switch; /* keyboard group modifi= ers */ TMkey.c:451: pd->mode_switch =3D 0; TMkey.c:464: if ((keysym =3D=3D XK_Mode_switch) && (i > 2)) TMkey.c:465: pd->mode_switch |=3D 1 << i; TMkey.c:531: *modifiers_return =3D (ShiftMask|LockMask) | pd->mode_switc= h | pd->num_lock; TMkey.c:541: if ((per > 2) && (modifiers & pd->mode_switch)) { So... I think that you could make this work by using xmodmap to assign one of the mod1-mod5 modifier names to the mode-switch key, and using that modifier in a translations resource binding for xterm. --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlTYg70ACgkQcCNT4PfkjtsTSACg3PYoZzvq8ciKtHSCzapWyZYI SsgAoK7t6xjKoIBwP0v0RsKbFNp6+cN0 =3dzR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 10:20:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D778AAEA for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 10:20:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 968D7B24 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 10:20:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.15.238.230] (helo=c720-r276659) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YKlRc-0006Jr-CQ; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:19:56 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:19:54 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Thomas Dickey Subject: Re: key Shift+Prior not working for scroll-up in xterm but in urxvt Message-ID: <20150209101953.GA2158@c720-r276659> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , Thomas Dickey , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20150206081525.GA1828@c720-r276659> <20150206092525.GA3070@aerie.jexium-island.net> <20150206130348.GA2764@c720-r276659> <20150209095405.GA32691@aerie.jexium-island.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20150209095405.GA32691@aerie.jexium-island.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r269739 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.15.238.230 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 10:20:08 -0000 El día Monday, February 09, 2015 a las 04:54:05AM -0500, Thomas Dickey escribió: > On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 02:03:48PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > El día Friday, February 06, 2015 a las 04:25:25AM -0500, Thomas Dickey escribió: > > > > > > I run this 11C on a small netbook (Acer C720) which does not have physical > > > > keys for PG_UP/DOWN; that's why I use xmodmap to define > > > > > > > > Mode_switch + UP --> Prior > > > > Mdee_switch + Down --> Next > > > > > > > > xmodmap -e "keycode 98 = Up Up Prior" > > > > xmodmap -e "keycode 104 = Down Down Next" > > > > > > > > When I now do in the terminal urxvt holding down both Mode_switch and > > > > Shift, it scrolls fine with the Up and Down keys as expected: the > > > > terminal window is scrolled up and down. > > > > > > > > When I do the same, the key is delivered to the xterm itself and I can > > > > see them, for example, with 'od -c' as: > > > > > > > > $ od -c > > > > ^[[5;2~^[[5;2~ > > > > ^[[6;2~^[[6;2~ > > > > 0000000 033 [ 5 ; 2 ~ 033 [ 5 ; 2 ~ \n 033 [ 6 > > > > 0000020 ; 2 ~ 033 [ 6 ; 2 ~ \n > > > > 0000032 > > > > > > > > The 033 [ 5 ; 2 ~ for Up and the 033 [ 6 ; 2 ~ for down. > > > > > > > > Why this does not work in xterm? > > > > > > That depends on what you want it to do (you did not say). > > > > I think, I said what I want: that with Mode_switch+Shift+Up/Down it does > > scrolling in xterm as it does in uRxvt. > > > > I followed your hints an tried configurations in the file > > ~/.Xdefaults-hostname: > > > > *VT100.translations: #override \ > > ShiftUp: scroll-back(1,page) \n\ > > ShiftDown: scroll-forw(1,page) \n\ > > ShiftF9: string("hola") > > > > (the last line for F9 is only to see if the file works at all). > > > > With the above config it now scrolls in xterm with Shift-Up/Down. But > > I'm unable to configure that it scrolls with Mode_switch+Shift+Up/Down > > and I want to have this to use the same key sequence in xterm and uRxvt > > and not always have to think where I am. > > > > Any idea? Thanks > > not immediately: my keyboard does not have a mode_switch key > (unless I tinker with xmodmap...). My keyboard does not has this key either; I'm using xmodmap and redefine the so called Windows-key with: xmodmap -e "keycode 0x40 = Mode_switch" If you want to test my problem, you could use this. About the rest of your hints I have to think deeper; Thx matthias -- Matthias Apitz, guru@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ +49-170-4527211 La referencia de la Duma a la anexión de la RDA, en este caso al contrario con la Crimlía sin referéndum, no solamente tiene gracia sino da en el blanco.- Marinos Yannikos @MarinosYannikos en un blog de RTdeutsch. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 13:11:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AA76318 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 13:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x233.google.com (mail-pa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26A2CF49 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 13:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id eu11so12026062pac.10 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 05:11:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :date:subject:to; bh=0oQ6VTijvFYBCpyKB887ML7rznRDIfuN8KA9udn2Gug=; b=S8am5BL1CMG78ZsW6TMAHamiCqgC/At29mYc6Dzd8IRiPBlZvMfCXX7mRZA+82yucM Gl0LDBC9YiWsItNN1uEU6enKY6MjxJfKpoTINQrzJ30FGU6LsoaCfPZ9R1KXKJYsWZ4G TSbZYxnjkcmNPyDnmvu+U/XT/Oq8vdmmnDf1AePNH/r6kW2FCAIEMf3xzrw+RcnFV1bk u51dJ7s7ksokfeCspZZ/JDjc15yGBi/27R2PgWKugqyZsFgGf010LPiLJ6d69QSaYsFm WrsMe5QlOVSxf8qgubNA0xS5F30Vrj9TW8ki/cECmBOHrxENJzhwXYV90XPdSrC8KtUR W75A== X-Received: by 10.66.187.237 with SMTP id fv13mr29059171pac.47.1423487475633; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 05:11:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([114.125.10.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bc4sm16486187pac.4.2015.02.09.05.11.13 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Feb 2015 05:11:14 -0800 (PST) From: 2AE3F4C4 X-Google-Original-From: 2AE3F4C4 X-Mailer: BlackBerry Email (10.2.1.3442) Message-ID: <20141015012425.5865623.93032.206@gmail.com> Subject: 5.2.1 miniinst cd panic during 3rd phase boot (kernel start). To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 13:30:16 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 13:11:16 -0000 X-Original-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:24:25 +0700 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 13:11:16 -0000 2AE3F4C4 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 13:13:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3CA149E for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 13:13:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com (mail-pd0-f174.google.com [209.85.192.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA428F60 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 13:13:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdbfp1 with SMTP id fp1so422564pdb.9 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 05:13:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :date:subject:to:cc; bh=0oQ6VTijvFYBCpyKB887ML7rznRDIfuN8KA9udn2Gug=; b=EeRqPkUv/vItpaqq2YaOv8vTaKda+Rl5eJHxCQmbq36njcgqRtqEQJ9eyCD6+kzHqQ vfI2OuXNbsUtwJuLyOzRdYgtY3rnwORRX0sX5AjdYFHkEDIoN+SjPm7HD88LaadiNKqQ 4/UHXViV4mIu2d6OeCE30pZFY+Y6wMTa/sTWfdOd/oVJk2c01rnirRNAdCHX3Kq/rf8P pz9BcTCcJYUqq+gGZJs8c5pYT0a0h3MtNM2KN05ZtvVP+wMU2jbu+FsQMypjooh+VGXE bV+eFurSgTtn152uUuoYAtfz9h7OLkGRAiDKRZE1ltiPzvXI5IIwOPX8ZaMOPmKFJUnJ V/6A== X-Received: by 10.68.200.201 with SMTP id ju9mr15336654pbc.157.1423487597756; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 05:13:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([114.125.10.6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ua7sm16497717pab.37.2015.02.09.05.13.15 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Feb 2015 05:13:16 -0800 (PST) From: 2AE3F4C4 X-Google-Original-From: 2AE3F4C4 X-Mailer: BlackBerry Email (10.2.1.3442) Message-ID: <20141015012627.5865623.55801.209@gmail.com> Subject: CVSUP question To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 13:30:40 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: Panca Agus Ananda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 13:13:23 -0000 X-Original-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 08:26:27 +0700 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 13:13:23 -0000 2AE3F4C4 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 13:59:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DC94E82 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 13:59:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C89660D for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 13:59:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.15.238.230] (helo=c720-r276659) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YKorj-0006UV-7T; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:59:07 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 14:59:03 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: Thomas Dickey Subject: Re: key Shift+Prior not working for scroll-up in xterm but in urxvt Message-ID: <20150209135903.GA4168@c720-r276659> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , Thomas Dickey , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20150206081525.GA1828@c720-r276659> <20150206092525.GA3070@aerie.jexium-island.net> <20150206130348.GA2764@c720-r276659> <20150209095405.GA32691@aerie.jexium-island.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20150209095405.GA32691@aerie.jexium-island.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r269739 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.15.238.230 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 13:59:13 -0000 El día Monday, February 09, 2015 a las 04:54:05AM -0500, Thomas Dickey escribió: > not immediately: my keyboard does not have a mode_switch key > (unless I tinker with xmodmap...). > > But here's a guess: > > Xt's translations don't know about mode_switch as such, so a fix is > likely to be in xmodmap. While xmodmap's manpage is vague about the > recognized modifiers, mentioning them by name only once: > > clear MODIFIERNAME > This removes all entries in the modifier map for the given mod‐ > ifier, where valid name are: Shift, Lock, Control, Mod1, Mod2, > Mod3, Mod4, and Mod5 (case does not matter in modifier names, > although it does matter for all other names). For example, > ``clear Lock'' will remove all any keys that were bound to the > shift lock modifier. > > The source code for the xmodmap program does not have a table of these names. > That is in the library. The library defines this table: > > static ModifierRec modifiers[] = { > {"Shift", 0, ParseModImmed,ShiftMask}, > {"Lock", 0, ParseModImmed,LockMask}, > {"Ctrl", 0, ParseModImmed,ControlMask}, > {"Mod1", 0, ParseModImmed,Mod1Mask}, > {"Mod2", 0, ParseModImmed,Mod2Mask}, > {"Mod3", 0, ParseModImmed,Mod3Mask}, > {"Mod4", 0, ParseModImmed,Mod4Mask}, > {"Mod5", 0, ParseModImmed,Mod5Mask}, > {"Meta", 0, ParseModSym, XK_Meta_L}, > {"m", 0, ParseModSym, XK_Meta_L}, > {"h", 0, ParseModSym, XK_Hyper_L}, > {"su", 0, ParseModSym, XK_Super_L}, > {"a", 0, ParseModSym, XK_Alt_L}, > {"Hyper", 0, ParseModSym, XK_Hyper_L}, > {"Super", 0, ParseModSym, XK_Super_L}, > {"Alt", 0, ParseModSym, XK_Alt_L}, > {"Button1", 0, ParseModImmed,Button1Mask}, > {"Button2", 0, ParseModImmed,Button2Mask}, > {"Button3", 0, ParseModImmed,Button3Mask}, > {"Button4", 0, ParseModImmed,Button4Mask}, > {"Button5", 0, ParseModImmed,Button5Mask}, > {"c", 0, ParseModImmed,ControlMask}, > {"s", 0, ParseModImmed,ShiftMask}, > {"l", 0, ParseModImmed,LockMask}, > }; > > and also in the library it treats the mode-switch specially (without naming > it): > > InitialI.h:307: Modifiers mode_switch; /* keyboard group modifiers */ > TMkey.c:451: pd->mode_switch = 0; > TMkey.c:464: if ((keysym == XK_Mode_switch) && (i > 2)) > TMkey.c:465: pd->mode_switch |= 1 << i; > TMkey.c:531: *modifiers_return = (ShiftMask|LockMask) | pd->mode_switch | pd->num_lock; > TMkey.c:541: if ((per > 2) && (modifiers & pd->mode_switch)) { > > So... I think that you could make this work by using xmodmap to assign > one of the mod1-mod5 modifier names to the mode-switch key, and using > that modifier in a translations resource binding for xterm. I tried your hint: $ xmodmap -pk | fgrep Mode_switch 8 0xff7e (Mode_switch) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0xff7e (Mode_switch) 64 0xff7e (Mode_switch) 0x0000 (NoSymbol) 0xff7e (Mode_switch) $ xmodmap -e 'add Mod3 = Mode_switch' X Error of failed request: BadValue (integer parameter out of range for operation) Major opcode of failed request: 118 (X_SetModifierMapping) Value in failed request: 0x17 Serial number of failed request: 11 Current serial number in output stream: 11 Perhaps, I understand you wrong? matthias -- Matthias Apitz, guru@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ +49-170-4527211 La referencia de la Duma a la anexión de la RDA, en este caso al contrario con la Crimlía sin referéndum, no solamente tiene gracia sino da en el blanco.- Marinos Yannikos @MarinosYannikos en un blog de RTdeutsch. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 16:41:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A513CC54 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 16:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CA5FB3B for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 16:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id z2so7623782wiv.1 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 08:41:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/kbfQdDXhQckSaCuYMwPx+/C0bn7vHeiSam+UduGyKo=; b=A7G8+pJI0c3jzfAb9tnQ2d9nDXZYbuOg2y3yhacSyF+Q1ISSBu+kAP7AR6qiUobo+3 sEqdWrEMQfDcL00KdEQpCBJ4RE4oWDdK1K8PirOjI9z6w97zJ92ZYPcGoDrpKU0AbWUn DC4DrXI/7bQ6wFoHOa8RS47zaCBbsqQOVDQHtBXS1s4gR28KzQMsKffqW3uqqIwhK3LN RZzPdj2VFUZ2mkhtf2T4AiM7n13Ji5y71DIrKzU1bWXJocRHJNBd3bCkH95doqUAGsgt Py1mP+ZneAle8sgPwrHH8xuhCQyx960LwnIGE1VDMRmPEluF7p7a3QGsvFDPikUM93vh IC8A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.236.200 with SMTP id uw8mr43250490wjc.10.1423500082614; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 08:41:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.157.69 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 08:41:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 08:41:22 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: /etc/pf.conf missing From: Chris Stankevitz To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 16:41:24 -0000 Hello, Q: Should I be alarmed? Handbook section 30.3.1 says "The default ruleset is already created and is named /etc/pf.conf" but that file does not exist on my hard drive. 10.1-RELEASE-p5 Thank you, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 17:12:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA4E7912 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 17:12:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B04EB6 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 17:12:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34CE33C1D; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 12:12:03 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id B15FE39814; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 12:12:02 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Chris Stankevitz Subject: Re: /etc/pf.conf missing References: Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 12:12:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Chris Stankevitz's message of "Mon, 9 Feb 2015 08:41:22 -0800") Message-ID: <44h9uvvwkd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:12:16 -0000 Chris Stankevitz writes: > Q: Should I be alarmed? > > Handbook section 30.3.1 says "The default ruleset is already created > and is named /etc/pf.conf" but that file does not exist on my hard > drive. The Handbook (or at least the obvious interpretation of what it says; the awkward phrasing may mean that it was mis-edited at some point) is incorrect. I'm not sure that a one-size-fits-all default ruleset (of the sort that exists for ipfw) is practical for pf. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 17:25:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5379ABB for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 17:25:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x236.google.com (mail-ob0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E534D0 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 17:25:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id nt9so26041215obb.13 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:25:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; bh=rmLdcyk5HljtyxdtOFJDQYI2lQyqNevKKzI/Yq42RQY=; b=ObRpZc44Q8/ktO88GGH7neme18uBD0KzYI9u5DpxWwSXrnzQO9yUh1ky2Jb7obb+KI tzWayjYdnWQmFEqTPPBS4KfCN1Kl/M3KE48Em+Xn7MiyPBXWcVUc7LRKUcgIF5b/7Gie SRux4w1873jO6thuYJ8NxoI/TnX7NiCWd+DJ6gHBBvY6gNJeJYso5ogqPBUDXc+Fians 6iat911VMliDNv7TQOwFbSY1o+EWvgR9aOQIAn7IGDsK01bbVfcQC5hO2ddGuf3j7Vdg 5UmpSVuEXmceX43W7Nb5H3PmyYDQ5R1G5Zr3C2cqO4tFLc6tbqw/Qb9lQcV13emeFrLs cgRQ== X-Received: by 10.202.194.212 with SMTP id s203mr12010471oif.115.1423502708397; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:25:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.64] (pool-173-57-168-11.dllstx.fios.verizon.net. [173.57.168.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p6sm5588562oib.13.2015.02.09.09.25.06 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:25:07 -0800 (PST) References: <44h9uvvwkd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: <44h9uvvwkd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPad Mail (12B440) From: Matthew Pherigo Subject: Re: /etc/pf.conf missing Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:25:08 -0600 To: Lowell Gilbert Cc: freebsd-questions , Chris Stankevitz X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:25:09 -0000 Yes, it seems to be incorrect there. Instead, it should probably mention the= directory at /usr/share/examples/pf/, which contains a complete sample pf.c= onf, along with some other rulesets for more fringe use cases. --Matt > On Feb 9, 2015, at 11:12 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >=20 > Chris Stankevitz writes: >=20 >> Q: Should I be alarmed? >>=20 >> Handbook section 30.3.1 says "The default ruleset is already created >> and is named /etc/pf.conf" but that file does not exist on my hard >> drive. >=20 > The Handbook (or at least the obvious interpretation of what it says; > the awkward phrasing may mean that it was mis-edited at some point) is > incorrect.=20 >=20 > I'm not sure that a one-size-fits-all default ruleset (of the sort that > exists for ipfw) is practical for pf. >=20 >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 17:38:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51AA9709 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 17:38:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10F0C263 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 17:38:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-63-165.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.63.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F54E3CCDD; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:30:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t19HU6pF002507; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:30:06 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:30:06 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Lowell Gilbert Subject: Re: /etc/pf.conf missing Message-Id: <20150209183006.c3902b51.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <44h9uvvwkd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <44h9uvvwkd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions , Chris Stankevitz X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:38:58 -0000 On Mon, 09 Feb 2015 12:12:02 -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Chris Stankevitz writes: > > > Q: Should I be alarmed? > > > > Handbook section 30.3.1 says "The default ruleset is already created > > and is named /etc/pf.conf" but that file does not exist on my hard > > drive. > > The Handbook (or at least the obvious interpretation of what it says; > the awkward phrasing may mean that it was mis-edited at some point) is > incorrect. > > I'm not sure that a one-size-fits-all default ruleset (of the sort that > exists for ipfw) is practical for pf. There is an example file at /usr/share/examples/pf/pf.conf as well as in "man 5 pf.conf", which reads in section FILES: /etc/pf.conf Default location of the ruleset file. This leaves the _possible_ interpretation that the file is supplied with the OS, but the _reasonable_ interpratation is that the file should be located like this per default _when_ it is present (and to be present, supplied by the administrator). So it doesn't look that this file is already created, unlike, for comparison, /etc/ps.os. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 17:50:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C957BE3B for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 17:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x235.google.com (mail-ig0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 923FF3A4 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 17:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id hn18so17980174igb.2 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:50:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mLAYQJrILpKSPAgx8feN/K5p+Gnf6eG9mwKX4Unlml8=; b=IQX1zN369fUHoGddovFVVQsPVq4Y9W8SLB6f1WjB60zXx1wj0c4Iz/iTutugYo3TtB Jjb+6M8trFvan0RqOAeajkEIGL3Lf0yXllsj1sdNz6v3flTwaF2u+DXS4WqlairtAMbs iLGbDwte1pircJIa4BNyXYcXqNLvc0xH9xLqLDNtr6Bd/+SYqoNk9MzbLA5XIj0+ViFQ Tb01gSOdUq647uF6q0x0FOuE7BGdYz/F4xCXrC0NO6E0TP2chYMBsuVyHXPA1PgL/Cp7 NXBN6661h0IHenORa2y0bIm0CiRZkQ7GlkSDl/N5/Oe41mMFrhwS4B+3Rr9ifzGsq1lv stQw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.200.136 with SMTP id ew8mr26061003icb.59.1423504213007; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:50:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.171.47 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 09:50:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:50:12 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Error installing postgresql94-plpython from ports From: Jason Garrett To: FreeBSD-Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:50:13 -0000 Hello all, I have been getting this error for the last several days while trying to install postgresql94-plpython from ports... ===> Registering installation for postgresql94-plpython-9.4.1 pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/databases/postgresql94-plpython/work/stage/usr/local/lib/postgresql/plpython2.so: No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/databases/postgresql94-plpython/work/stage/usr/local/share/postgresql/extension/plpythonu.control: No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/databases/postgresql94-plpython/work/stage/usr/local/share/postgresql/extension/plpythonu--1.0.sql: No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/databases/postgresql94-plpython/work/stage/usr/local/share/postgresql/extension/plpythonu--unpackaged--1.0.sql: No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/databases/postgresql94-plpython/work/stage/usr/local/share/postgresql/extension/plpython2u.control: No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/databases/postgresql94-plpython/work/stage/usr/local/share/postgresql/extension/plpython2u--1.0.sql: No such file or directory pkg-static: Unable to access file /usr/ports/databases/postgresql94-plpython/work/stage/usr/local/share/postgresql/extension/plpython2u--unpackaged--1.0.sql: No such file or directory *** Error code 74 Looks like it's having trouble finding the required files above... Anyone have a workaround? I tried submitting a bug report but ended up getting locked out of my account due to too many incorrect password attempts. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 18:04:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08EF9679 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:04:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D492C7C6 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 18:04:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2B8A33C28; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 13:04:23 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 7AB2A39814; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 13:04:23 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Matthew Pherigo Subject: Re: /etc/pf.conf missing References: <44h9uvvwkd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Reply-To: freebsd-questions Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 13:04:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Matthew Pherigo's message of "Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:25:08 -0600") Message-ID: <44a90nvu54.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 18:04:30 -0000 Matthew Pherigo writes: > Yes, it seems to be incorrect there. Instead, it should probably > mention the directory at /usr/share/examples/pf/, which contains a > complete sample pf.conf, along with some other rulesets for more > fringe use cases. It does mention the examples. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 19:07:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32315648 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com (mail-we0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C562CE8F for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id l61so28922950wev.13 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:07:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=sFYu/AO3dQ+O4NdqzH5IJs2x3h4vA9aIuyV1IBK9mP4=; b=Zcd2qwF2Jp209o62hS1HoIvMxS/O2njajotG5BA4VZSIxA5NFM5xIq8MmozpPxPNJF ++xqn7Osy6YJ2Fg2gIy2bblcn1R6lBjCK1xLZslYUN+lE9rPcdRnhJ1r/sir2DM/2/UD ewXKVYj1rmvCUqclepT4UQ5GInUL2n19uvAGO3JgpwXiIvP8Q1FrP9chb/6+uVLgsTw7 KBc4H7MgDeWCt1IUJMQAabCZCwHNL0KtmcAapggTCY7D+2tEWhpbzSuiVeXeG5Ac3AAz keD/aPRN9+UGBhV2snWzvRlejfhhepabl8stnWYdDbDlikiqET7NrGhmJXMgrioKzKvC FN9A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.90.177 with SMTP id bx17mr37856930wib.36.1423508877183; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:07:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.157.69 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:07:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:07:57 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: obspamd_enable, obspamd_flags From: Chris Stankevitz To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:07:59 -0000 Q: What is the rc.conf "enable" command for spamd? A: obspamd_enable="YES" Q: How did you know that? A: grep enable /usr/ports/mail/spamd/files/pkg-message.in Q: Why the "ob" prefix? A: Who knows. Q: What is the rc.conf "flags" command for spamd? A: [your answer here] Q: How did you know that? A: [your answer here... please don't say "bing"] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 19:20:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12D6ACC5 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:20:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from a0i241.smtpcorp.com (a0i241.smtpcorp.com [216.22.15.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE4E1DE for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:20:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smtpcorp.com; s=a0_1; h=Feedback-ID:X-Smtpcorp-Track:Message-ID:Date:Subject:To:From; bh=KqBAjyrwWybp1llaq+WMMnckJhTbsp168dDxsybhpg0=; b=ewXSqUWpxHqDZRUMwTgUYuRSOnpf6gLeQ/nM9+whc6sHzJkhLvTNjpDvoReD2FlpxHPAqyBa1buma6GmLLhZjZl27OWDJ2E1NMJi+jod4KDWzf64oDXbltGoJvC1YlM8GXWgUZGHQP1L+2+lADaI+vOsx/sEBvjSs+xhiN9LISg=; From: Daniel Corbe To: Lowell Gilbert Subject: Re: /etc/pf.conf missing References: <44h9uvvwkd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:20:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <44h9uvvwkd.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> (Lowell Gilbert's message of "Mon, 09 Feb 2015 12:12:02 -0500") Message-ID: <87twyuj3hw.fsf@corbe.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Smtpcorp-Track: 1YKtswmk-zWw7M.2QiLF3dvq Feedback-ID: 10661m:10661aegzayD:10661sqsQoeqcWA:SMTPCORP Cc: freebsd-questions , Chris Stankevitz X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:20:44 -0000 Lowell Gilbert writes: > Chris Stankevitz writes: > >> Q: Should I be alarmed? >> >> Handbook section 30.3.1 says "The default ruleset is already created >> and is named /etc/pf.conf" but that file does not exist on my hard >> drive. > > The Handbook (or at least the obvious interpretation of what it says; > the awkward phrasing may mean that it was mis-edited at some point) is > incorrect. > > I'm not sure that a one-size-fits-all default ruleset (of the sort that > exists for ipfw) is practical for pf. > > The first time I ever messed with pf it was extremely difficult finding practical examples. Maybe what the distribution needs is more of this and less of a one-size-fits-all approach. Teaching tools in the form of configuration examples is also a great way to get people thinking about security issues. For example: How do you get small offices and home users thinking about inbound connectivity to their IPv6 endpoints now that NAT is no longer a thing? And I know NAT is a terrible example of a security model; but generally speaking, people are going to want NAT-like functionality in IPv6 where you're only passing inbound traffic to inside hosts on established connections. IE: # Default deny block out inet6 all block in inet6 all # NAT-like behavior pass out inet6 proto tcp flags S/SA keep state pass out inet6 proto {udp, icmp6} flags S/SA modulate state # Inbound rules go here ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 19:27:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35802421 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:27:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-f173.google.com (mail-lb0-f173.google.com [209.85.217.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFFBE15B for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f173.google.com with SMTP id n10so4756163lbv.4 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:27:30 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Vo+3lNwhnEp3FQthHAFHwn/7L8TAewlXtOLTP28k1fM=; b=K8XSJNUTDe2BJh7R4AUYN0G0IDJUTfI9Gk/qk9dQN6hiTZh1BQSrtYcuL/xunqcV6D B34s9SC/bGZojkj+qFAmbblcMPuM+XadCI2TkcqeHJ33dUlWgYsVwY7NSXuThH9zD6AT ZscPNQaBVAOnoXMloHc7jDVRPid3zHZ4fy8tGjJPr+CE3vNbwDIyv30tNIF/rLhIYUL2 i4bxEOkITXqcftF+g/VY1bmxWEecbu/nk1U3CzmV9IWbTNrlghWJe/obarcrVifHweZX gZncgdh5dn1hUjMJ5kLUmm0LH96aOy+O5Oimjt6lCnqP5U6bVsgIpL/2ycRP9ARf7rsJ MMOw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlo0QMSEmZIG/Zvp3a0R21C9++z9KgmX7BTyMfSwxee/l75lgPQ/0frhAjmBj5YPHbagRUx MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.244.163 with SMTP id xh3mr19556202lac.25.1423510050142; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:27:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.112.137 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:27:30 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [140.239.2.162] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:27:30 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: obspamd_enable, obspamd_flags From: "Brian W." To: Chris Stankevitz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:27:39 -0000 I dont use this but a read of the makefile suggests ob is an openbsd reference. # If you are a CPANEL user the this option is for you! # CPANEL sends periodic a 'kill -TERM spamd' to the SpamAssassin spamd, and # this kills also the OpenBSD spamd daemon. # With this option spamd will be installed as obspamd, and the rc script will # be adjusted. Man page and pid file will not be renamed! On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Chris Stankevitz wrote: > Q: What is the rc.conf "enable" command for spamd? > > A: obspamd_enable="YES" > > > Q: How did you know that? > > A: grep enable /usr/ports/mail/spamd/files/pkg-message.in > > > Q: Why the "ob" prefix? > > A: Who knows. > > > Q: What is the rc.conf "flags" command for spamd? > > A: [your answer here] > > > Q: How did you know that? > > A: [your answer here... please don't say "bing"] > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 19:56:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3683C14 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f176.google.com (mail-ie0-f176.google.com [209.85.223.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 871C3693 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:56:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iebtr6 with SMTP id tr6so19269840ieb.2 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:55:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=PedHf4bW422vOCyIOqDmJ6ORpsZ4lnG6XtLYz8vrO7w=; b=hc1MuNf8aZFNRk8ztxJZHtVH/IAlZdufyvO0w/EWE5XLOZWZFFXpvA7zPw+urEnbcR hZteUpdLZkiC+FtllWBZ9J7GASgfzEU/kYFJiUwDr+EXmmTB3nIAXanpvk7dk/kmMZtn cAOO5mVh9+17XguJgjmN2KeZL9JHSelmii0+HHCqM/6MOS3AlrWY+BDeGziGfJYjaBmt aliomdVz0suPdassqRfkQUHOH1pYAiSgSrOjfBdddAl1eLl+Rm+UPPV9eqkv1pXz0m6R HjUze4xhqNLfTS/kHJPngMdpjwrr7LqfE4WRYtFuVrjVfYlmkUxYDGr7lqcP9G+iSEYI T57w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.139.13 with SMTP id iu13mr27459724icc.55.1423511759547; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:55:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.29.169 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:55:59 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 14:55:59 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: See which user is deleting files From: Jeremy Gransden To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:56:00 -0000 Is there a way to log when files get deleted and by whom? thanks, J From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 19:59:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1600D43 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com (mail-pd0-f180.google.com [209.85.192.180]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 897AF6C2 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdbft15 with SMTP id ft15so33441440pdb.11 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:59:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kMyeGQEkQKbwOpGYHhh/r1UbLBgjBDaDdxe1to0Zyjk=; b=HqdqLKjqXwID2NZlh9cev2mhTVA6eVZe9KY5NxbjMTHwEBou08pDSnQ0IlOV9BZ2sU bpjTvR/8dV4WFbnOwg0CESxZmydLM2z9wQoZ6wFJLM9FsdCQ9sotsV3QNkRycBr9cXwy I7LB7wu7+4ggtRefNl8Uu2+D4dE3CX8RsOKe/Uq9tEizB25a3P4Qf7cBxH+3m4XJRDO3 eNNIRUdqVx2CEEos+46g6N7VXasEyFY4i3Zamx7XH+I+gvNT0zuDw3b6oLyyfGJ9Catj 3MO7sKSYrmYWKS+G4MznHlAB9IAFwlVknuzkVLXnzNqiklOz2VQ0Gw4EMGziGpYVvI2V /o1Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.70.48.33 with SMTP id i1mr31554928pdn.153.1423511981500; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:59:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.110.134 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 11:59:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 13:59:41 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: See which user is deleting files From: Adam Vande More To: Jeremy Gransden Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:59:47 -0000 On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Jeremy Gransden wrote: > Is there a way to log when files get deleted and by whom? > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/audit.html -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 20:02:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FC1AE30 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 20:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C449E7D4 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 20:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-63-165.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.63.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A2F33CD85; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:02:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t19K2dc7002946; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:02:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:02:39 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Jeremy Gransden Subject: Re: See which user is deleting files Message-Id: <20150209210239.fe545836.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:02:43 -0000 On Mon, 9 Feb 2015 14:55:59 -0500, Jeremy Gransden wrote: > Is there a way to log when files get deleted and by whom? A possible approach would be to make /bin/rm a script that logs the required information. Or, on a per-user or global basis, an alias (but this depends on the shell heavily). The idea with the script sounds a little better because it would already get the evaluated shell arguments, and all programs (!) that call /bin/rm would be "affected". Of course, if a program doesn't use /bin/rm, but instead calls unlink(), it doesn't work anymore. THis will probably be true for most UI-based programs (for example deleting from X file managers, or even with Midnight Commander's PF8). It's probably a better idea to use a file alteration monitor to track when files disappear. However, I don't know if those tools around have the ability to determine _who_ deleted files... Maybe there are accounting tools that track I/O activity in a way that they can capture the creation of files in the same way as their removal? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 20:07:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9F28FFD for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 20:07:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.indylix.nl (mail.indylix.nl [31.220.44.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9919881B for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 20:07:39 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <54D91141.3060707@indylix.nl> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=indylix.nl; s=o26EqTc7; t=1423511878; bh=RsF33KPMU8Z9ytBMTRxiY2KYOh5APPXDBJBdgc0oZAU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=Bav352BS5b0I/d0ZoZS/fW+KIKP/7AlFpNInETfrjO18hwpF6YnVyede9IaB7784N jn+08D39hLmFMJNqQ1s/faUWfOYChkXu56P4QOR0mPdwJjQ7bmEg3PFUSVy57qMo2g IY7JcxTiZXguSm114afE8QntVFbkwhgnywH1h67ue+qeaIcYCgWOkoVuqyB+nvKlFc l4xRCWDmZ3upkW+EUwZf9UydKUs0VN7gBTyebT5fKP4RJMQfEel+XUKVYTdiKrhSye 4V0Zu/6thz4YBgVySxaqWjxMoLKAzLOwpmOfz+EqEOI6yWJ3F1N6TpMs+l4niPXNPS YSKQE79PYBpaQ== Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:57:53 +0100 From: Robert Sevat MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: See which user is deleting files References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2LqkLJIrcUBGgWMSrquqjvoP7mTEBwtRm" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:07:40 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --2LqkLJIrcUBGgWMSrquqjvoP7mTEBwtRm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey, You can turn on auditing and have it specifically log file deletion event= s. https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/audit.html "fd file delete Audit events where file deletion occurs." Kind Regards, Robert Sevat On 02/09/2015 08:55 PM, Jeremy Gransden wrote: > Is there a way to log when files get deleted and by whom? >=20 >=20 > thanks, > J > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd= =2Eorg" >=20 --2LqkLJIrcUBGgWMSrquqjvoP7mTEBwtRm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU2RFBAAoJEOBNTiYXv1P06WUP/18ZvwtCagK92aCxFMUptJJe obX+JQkiYm84MadXgAXQvcB8VyIBdhtW+aZcHePuGgbDQeGlvXd4/Qzgsgp95M+C ups6RsWemQ+DSLR2hax1sPn2oV+idMhUPiT97Efo8VJLhdeu4KjFzENwrnhqB48a bSN2xHiCG9d87AU+ZQanEgjNun2t/IWIRaEKStu/5H0B19LpsmbjMnjt+CHOC+Kz fcTcaMrhNfCOlBKxc79FpPhAivGcAVi288UEX1N63gaBH7vdUwUuKW2CumBKl+9M cnbR11YZtSlGi9fSJ0H4PKy6fSvRTBiGGI3iA+quFBvL0c9YDIU4XcF0ojIcJLuU SyAy6XCL0Ik+UUD8PyrpOYivdVk/SfIF3BA4IWFw75e4x3h3x0u7eUrjnFP2d2vR avdyIMdfMm4sr82tqU/y33PPBWBN9OZYOi0YRrDllj5I6HjV3KzapFWWNMbdB9wx BK37YSKufuYsx5dqJ5lVHuINhVNGir89ceIbKYqfrCa7eRzVGYqvqA5uQyMwWyar aHtJJmM8jR/T/cDEhf5DuZ5UzX8rgL7IbjsyNAgZNbN6TNjSaAVm8HmN2htauEJx 01SCqreHTxOo6oLVcak6sZrfLiVweZVMXCNHMqA1uxAeD5S32ag+TR5zHhLlbvsr ljL16qOQ0FwoZL+t0dOA =D7jW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2LqkLJIrcUBGgWMSrquqjvoP7mTEBwtRm-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 21:28:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60124455 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03389142 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.7] ([95.208.217.184]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MLAED-1YKetF15az-000Lq3 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:28:00 +0100 From: Wolfgang Kamradek Subject: FreeBSD 10.1 Installation on Acer Aspire ES1 111M C56A with eMMC SSD Message-Id: <159F57D2-365A-4F1B-A60D-DABD7B2B4FC5@kamradek.de> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 22:27:59 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.1 \(1993\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1993) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:kF0V/1BnJZJpD+pVeEkLYiYGHo6GT5Gaqs8odcvswd60EsGmV37 8mHQ+QIpk5wdIdzLdSh88Sh8C0s6sKOHQyt/00B4W/FVoOxDvZmsVxNYl0bzTMyCi8O5FOk m48v1Duo5k4Gi/7fqmjCwiguRiYjqtEx5cpknmP7hDT9RImO2J2bJFviKyxyXmYTZJGm6G4 zs4RLUq9jzaxRE8P4pwTw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 21:28:09 -0000 Hello, I just bought a new Acer E11 111M C56A with 32GB eMMC disc. = Unfortunately FreeBSD completely ignores this disc during the = installation step to auto configure ZFS or UFS. The eMMC Disc does not show up at all. Some Details: - x64 Installer boots fine in Legacy mode from external USB DVD. - ZFS auto configure finds 0 disks - UFS auto configure stops with the following error: "Partitioning error = - An installation step has been aborted. Would you like to restart..." - Manual Disk Setup also stops directly with the same error as UFS auto = configure (partitioning error) I thought that I could maybe manually add a missing driver with a shell = or load a missing kernel module to be able to detect the device? User = wblock@forums.freebsd gave me a hint that this eMMC device is maybe not = supported by mmc(4).=20 On the other hand I learned from diverse websites that it's possible to = boot FreeBSD from eMMC devices for the BeagleBone. Also Linux = installation, I tried arch and mint so far, is not a problem. = Unfortunately my FreeBSD skills are limited... Any hints are highly appreciated. Thanks in advance, \\'.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 21:33:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B8E269D for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x229.google.com (mail-ig0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E62322D for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 21:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hl2so17949470igb.0 for ; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 13:33:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NIRP/Olmx4705p1E1pkONNcJ2qrCy7WwR+Uw49wv6+4=; b=sX6FVLl0KX8P53D9q8gBJ6xSoBjbuyIxEOGnFrPpa0qdW+QgeC0Ta0mTVpcIzQ7oes mCRzA7mIjmiCfTK5vzekOFVUnJiYZ1gUh3lNdVfCiTOTnJe0H/6R+OSwQGcC3jmRSxAv prefO88zhYCrH828MTW5dBOIcJJsLMtskgqP2DEIe5e3lcNLT4EsL9LlCTtTabIOEB9O LFZ5Utz8pBPfvqmMtDRvM+1RcE9836suE8aabV3Rz3VS4UX9CU7MEAEb/0Q8PUepC+56 9LxAtNXHNZnJbEHXMD9pqzHoq3jY1gFFFDZwksNIW/+Xp8ZiYPDYtgTIXt4oCPlC5zDu i03Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.49.43 with SMTP id r11mr19890993ign.18.1423517583728; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 13:33:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.29.169 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 13:33:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54D91141.3060707@indylix.nl> References: <54D91141.3060707@indylix.nl> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 16:33:03 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: See which user is deleting files From: Jeremy Gransden To: Robert Sevat Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 21:33:04 -0000 That looks very promising. Thank you very much. thanks, J On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Robert Sevat wrote: > Hey, > > You can turn on auditing and have it specifically log file deletion events. > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/audit.html > > "fd file delete Audit events where file deletion occurs." > > Kind Regards, > Robert Sevat > > On 02/09/2015 08:55 PM, Jeremy Gransden wrote: > > Is there a way to log when files get deleted and by whom? > > > > > > thanks, > > J > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 9 22:04:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27FC9475 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 22:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 904917CF for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 22:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t19M4dLY044490 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 22:04:50 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t19M4dLY044490 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t19M4dLY044490; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral Message-ID: <54D92EED.8060001@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:04:29 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: obspamd_enable, obspamd_flags References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fuCGaX8mDaD5amcgKgNSMdgnAFgRJQhDw" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 22:04:57 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --fuCGaX8mDaD5amcgKgNSMdgnAFgRJQhDw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/02/2015 19:07, Chris Stankevitz wrote: > Q: Why the "ob" prefix? >=20 > A: Who knows. It's 'OpenBSD spamd' to distinguish it from 'sa-spamd' which is part of SpamAssassin. The answers to your third and fourth questions are to be found in the spamd(8) man page -- meaning you should type: % man 8 spamd because if you leave out the section number, you'll get spamd(1) which describes the /other/ spamd... Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --fuCGaX8mDaD5amcgKgNSMdgnAFgRJQhDw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJU2S72XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATHF8P/0wW9daCyZXLes4NpGQb139n NZ1yRTwQJy4MFgjBO9I4RwkuCneuumyveie4IHpC7hTDGcR7GQtydAIvUQJMf+y5 jvWuQJqwLYBw6zJMxc6n7ET4YynThROclDDxhC7HsD5ZYWL+RG2C5Wyt02Ru/TpD 28RZZffulartCswmmYlV5JczvlMvnPFkEIQYI03fxFzZA4uy2+0MrDKfmUtww4Gl kTqLQQYWfO/rnP5pOySLvaY/1oOoO8uG1Haf8sHVBdirr8TweOHbRiphmiYOYIJW Y9ypQI/sC+5SzCSlVIaPCaNfinY6GfVHw8bKU+3ocYrpw9ZcLR0PYNKu+o2fqrAd hDRlPqBxInx40GEIRqZUi/LOHe8cbcbowLzWlfWuaxidBpgisdGnAU67AFD/fN/B N0LI4feC3r6YJC46EHmpa34hK1Lsc46wBzo1O3W2QaLBSoIxiRSVKimBH7GyZP8W SyTgy514kLJajdKqpO/CH11v2BJbcjghXRMSy2LUoKetUClN/5zpPOlGhWp34TJj 6DZEMYuHS0GPX8PIhYLVXNV1t1zoGEiWdCB7RNBnP2JTUBw8quD9ALienhWJqrWt g8msSvvYerGHjfw6LATm3yTF4rCUoMBAs1RH5nrhSUSmxAlBnAQkJFAXFBs2n+sE EEiLiUvFbVVOwwBjDR0v =nGib -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fuCGaX8mDaD5amcgKgNSMdgnAFgRJQhDw-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 10:01:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00001D9E for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:01:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.spotlightcrm.com (spotlightcrm.com [198.38.92.163]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69AC16F for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BETASVR (abts-mum-dynamic-225.66.70.182.airtelbroadband.in [182.70.66.225]) by mail.spotlightcrm.com with SMTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 01:46:00 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "John Peterson" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Reply-To: jpeterson@spotlightleads.com Date: 10 Feb 2015 15:13:02 +0530 Subject: SpotLighter on your iPhone for $200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:01:19 -0000 =0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A
=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A= =0D=0A= =0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A= =0D=0A= =0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A= =0D=0A=0D=0A= =0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A= =0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A= =0D=0A=0D=0A
=0D=0A

=0D=0A

Dear Exhibitor ,

=0D=0A

 

=0D=0A=0D=0A= =0D=0A=0D=0A
= =0D=0A

=

=0D=0A

=0D=0A

For select shows, you can download SpotLighterTM= app on your iPhone for $200 rental per show per device.

= =0D=0A

 

=0D=0A
    =0D=0A
  • =0D=0AScan= barcoded badge using iPhone camera.=0D=0A
  • =0D=0A
    SpotLighter does not need= constant connection with internet to get information from the barcode badge.
    = =0D=0A
  • =0D=0A
    You can scan badges, view lead details even when disconnected= from network.
    =0D=0A
  • =0D=0A
    No compromise on SpotLighter= features.
    =0D=0A
  • =0D=0A
    Lead qualification with 20 choices.
    = =0D=0A
  • =0D=0A
    Free format notes can be associated with each lead.
    = =0D=0A
  • =0D=0A
    Lead report in excel format.
    =0D=0A
  • =0D=0AImpressive= and easy to use state-of-the-art system.=0D=0A
  • =0D=0APhone= support during the rental period.
= =0D=0A

Please let us know your show names so we can give you proposal for= SpotLighter.

=0D=0A

If you do not have iPhone, SpotLighter is still available= at $350 including our hardware.

=0D=0A

For more information on= the product, click links below.

=0D=0A

 

=0D=0A

= SpotLighter Overview

=0D=0A

 

=0D=0A

= Sample Report

=0D=0A

 

=0D=0A

Please contact John on 703 665= 6607 for any queries or urgent requirements related to SpotLighter.

=0D=0A

 

=0D=0A

SpotLighter Marketing Team

= =0D=0A

spotlightermarketing@spotlightleads.com

= =0D=0A

Phone: 703 665 6607 

=0D=0A

 

= =0D=0A

SpotLighter Lead Retrieval system from VarIT Inc.

=0D=0A

 

=0D=0A

=0D=0A

=0D=0ATo unsubscribe from Spotlighter= mailer program kindly Click= here. =0D=0A

=0D=0A

 

From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 10:29:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 438D23AA for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:29:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f173.google.com (mail-ie0-f173.google.com [209.85.223.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1546B6CF for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:29:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iebtr6 with SMTP id tr6so23501187ieb.4 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 02:29:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=oHuhi2P16gN4KlR3VGOe3wDzBYilZbtj5bMD311EpRs=; b=Zjb1Ed9ghUfmyXNBTjhNZ63Oz6F+GAUMJi2QvnBmnOoMt0O7xTcrbgdGyBZLa3Ox/w H77v10rSvXRQ6nQ4Ajeh/dR0U6nrDQ/J0DRjz9X/F4N6Yw3jYrkz/aNZyrldZlhwPwAj 73kGpuABv+fQpgQXIUUhWOzxpBCVakB6g4hWdbBrccsMtqOZAZcIIIPZHM7tB8j9/9tn Zh3kdAi93eb+VL9K7mg250edpFHd1uJsZ5DxTm+/xY1VmR8q2jFTLyZ49TBvZN+0A+LG iCavaWnRP05R6vd5xeHEGP12Lrchr9tTdcyWIX2sBHSKrOVcBq7H1xFgYqSkOBPYspv2 IuSQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.43.89.136 with SMTP id be8mr5019731icc.57.1423564154097; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 02:29:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.120.9 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 02:29:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.120.9 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 02:29:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:29:13 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Spam From: Malcolm Matalka To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:29:15 -0000 This mailing list produces almost all of the spam I receive. Is there any plan to reduce the spam? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 15:52:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B803F85C for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from topdeck.tinsleyviaduct.com (7.9.f.d.3.0.e.f.f.f.9.e.a.d.6.1.7.9.d.7.9.2.f.f.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa [IPv6:2001:8b0:ff29:7d97:16da:e9ff:fe03:df97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C954EE1 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailgate.tinsleyviaduct.com ([2001:8b0:ff29:7d97::25:1] helo=topdeck.tinsleyviaduct.com ident=phil) by topdeck.tinsleyviaduct.com with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YLD7O-0003z4-Gm for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:52:55 +0000 Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:52:54 +0000 From: Phil Reynolds To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spam Message-ID: <20150210155254.736611dc@topdeck.tinsleyviaduct.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:52:58 -0000 On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:29:13 +0100 Malcolm Matalka wrote: > This mailing list produces almost all of the spam I receive. Is there > any plan to reduce the spam? The list is open for posting to by non-members. There are reasons for this, but this also means it is open to spam. Annoying, but nothing that can really be done about it. -- Phil Reynolds mail: phil-freebsd@tinsleyviaduct.com Web: http://phil.tinsleyviaduct.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 17:12:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BDCA32F for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:12:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-vc0-x22b.google.com (mail-vc0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C4E49FC for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:12:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id kv19so5905021vcb.2 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:12:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=68NWFAEoO+MYmIGrPJh/34O0gsx5VHOqS1OEV0eD6bo=; b=p8ux7E4PL3Oq0oGjS6Uk1OejxOpiGnbQ+SxQ9KiIyJBc+kXKdIKeJwSquKt9+tMX9J rwTVfKizSxNsPlEFjrU+5eUumIaONNrEsmHsxAHKxloxKU2h3s0W22E6527/8MD49Dpv 1GQppPuAw5meW39Rt/oeCupue9XI5+F03uDuiZ9SqVTDwzHKHhE2jUVOr6O5SkcNJTpg PsO+r5uxfbo1fbq32XmKHRPzketGEB4TwFp9cw9DupbJUNWfT01w01s5SQxUMceknfau Oq4i9A9n+vMms994Tq2gUA1pTbr/n6vAwCKmLI4t3/YhhQdTyU2f19p+YKuwoqvzNZQm FKtA== X-Received: by 10.52.99.230 with SMTP id et6mr12632324vdb.17.1423588332944; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:12:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from smaug.zep.net (pool-173-73-139-83.washdc.fios.verizon.net. [173.73.139.83]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x7sm863332vdi.16.2015.02.10.09.12.12 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:12:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54DA3BEB.7020400@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:12:11 -0500 From: zep User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spam References: <20150210155254.736611dc@topdeck.tinsleyviaduct.com> In-Reply-To: <20150210155254.736611dc@topdeck.tinsleyviaduct.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:12:14 -0000 On 02/10/2015 10:52 AM, Phil Reynolds wrote: > On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:29:13 +0100 > Malcolm Matalka wrote: > >> This mailing list produces almost all of the spam I receive. Is there >> any plan to reduce the spam? > The list is open for posting to by non-members. There are reasons for > this, but this also means it is open to spam. Annoying, but nothing > that can really be done about it. I don't know that that's true/accurate. there might not be anything that can easily be done about it but there are a wide range of spam catching programs and other methodologies that could be implemented. -- public gpg key id: AE60F64C From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 17:33:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A9898C3 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com (mail-pa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04861C48 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:33:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id kx10so27559297pab.13 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:33:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :thread-index:content-language; bh=0aLD/fbPb76588Niviy1zw12m6eNPuFheLnoTVM4jys=; b=Q16+NA0W68jpwtet9oIwChQoYFdNLF60PukoHrsr1Z4VElJwB53YIH+Gw8hrzdOhOJ Qi9byI+AApje2mb/dvPY7dfxVp5qfBhNFQKkl7gHncKwuP5bsS8/GWhmTfQG5Jko8Y2K 3QgaDokPa1Bw9Fjurn/Ch6nDQvnSJLrkqSnT3qlivaeiYI6Dfl4Hlww50jiSH0DXDIH5 UwxkSh85hMzdG4HejqkpXMz80cDPj+fdWewDxfTcoioMuM2b+aQTPqejBSyr3yGO4Asf MNlR/aTIcQUPUY7sZWLKMx+Q5HALZ67eAkt5tTn5Oob1WmW1R8g01axUU93YEUXuSLA6 wVIw== X-Received: by 10.70.50.194 with SMTP id e2mr39866952pdo.74.1423589584431; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:33:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from astraticoPiCi (ppp079166140044.access.hol.gr. [79.166.140.44]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qj3sm17540380pac.31.2015.02.10.09.33.01 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:33:03 -0800 (PST) From: "xripro" To: Subject: libsupc++.so.1 problem after launching opera Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:32:54 +0200 Message-ID: <004b01d04557$9fe969d0$dfbc3d70$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AdBFVpcjSnNVtPojQTqJpc/KoU9Dzw== Content-Language: el Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:33:05 -0000 Hi to all, I am on current r278361 and I have installed www/opera. When I am launching opera I get this error message: Error locating 'readfile' - Shared object "libsupc++.so.1" not found, required by "libstdc++.so.6" The browser seems to start up normally but it display some of the web pages that I am trying to browse. How can I resolve this error? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 19:07:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62A45D86 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E29AB8A1 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:07:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hi2so6443676wib.0 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:07:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:content-type:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hTXbPUQpZAknfVel/fJRGElUZUsAo6FulLPJJOGErkU=; b=mdxJAYEDNdKFgO0yRm1O7+RrNxF9bT+TFBhnEJXuaZdW+SfzI16l83W1twpn5mvAU5 PwnIOcJDLYm9dXjomo0OCuol1UVYuAAVZl8hczZOds8LjYd8+uW8+OGdo+M98pac8JPz QHAeoTg2q2UBSxHzXnP1Ypqf6EyXyp3wHlrp55CxOK6TbmlvI5SxpcZricfEq9ny/tZn BYbbwaZtNgOLFa47hQI+/FiKFPp6ASyAxtNal/+cS+jW85ESwGJplIPcFSNZHMiVvprU fhWyt0KxH0umNmL7yMl5sLfpsMTYu9iFRZHyXtXprKRBAivMyfABohECK9+SBsCpBbVN PEzg== X-Received: by 10.180.210.203 with SMTP id mw11mr49204896wic.53.1423595243439; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:07:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from x220.optiplex-networks.com (optiplexnetworks.plus.com. [212.159.80.17]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x18sm20052690wia.12.2015.02.10.11.07.22 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:07:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1423595241.32285.11.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Net-SNMP not loading UCD-DISKIO-MIB? From: Kaya Saman To: freebsd-questions Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:07:21 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.10 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:07:25 -0000 Hi, I graph my system's usage via snmp and rrd. For some reason the net-snmp package isn't loading the diskio MIB?? The package was built from @Ports with perl selected among a few other modules. I clearly have the MIB in /usr/local/share/snmp/mibs: -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 4613 Feb 8 07:45 UCD-DISKIO-MIB.txt however, for some reason it isn't being loaded. Running an snmpwalk and 'grepping' for disk or DISK doesn't show anything at all. I've checked the snmpd.log which isn't showing anything outside of "connection established at ...." The config file hasn't changed from when the mib worked till now. I'm wondering if anyone can help me with this; Though not sure what more information to provide? Running snmpwalk with the -Cp flag I get this: HOST-RESOURCES-MIB::hrSWRunParameters.93288 = STRING: "ucd-io" as response but that's all. Many thanks. Kaya From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 19:14:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37C1DFA5 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:14:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA9E896F for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-63-165.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.63.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F0443CC56; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:13:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t1AJDsXb002125; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:13:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:13:53 +0100 From: Polytropon To: zep Subject: Re: Spam Message-Id: <20150210201353.91cc3a33.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <54DA3BEB.7020400@gmail.com> References: <20150210155254.736611dc@topdeck.tinsleyviaduct.com> <54DA3BEB.7020400@gmail.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:14:04 -0000 On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:12:11 -0500, zep wrote: > > On 02/10/2015 10:52 AM, Phil Reynolds wrote: > > On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:29:13 +0100 > > Malcolm Matalka wrote: > > > >> This mailing list produces almost all of the spam I receive. Is there > >> any plan to reduce the spam? > > The list is open for posting to by non-members. There are reasons for > > this, but this also means it is open to spam. Annoying, but nothing > > that can really be done about it. > > I don't know that that's true/accurate. there might not be anything > that can easily be done about it but there are a wide range of spam > catching programs and other methodologies that could be implemented. Due to the content and "construction" of spam messages, it should be easy for postprocessing filters to eliminate them from the inbox (or already deny their receiving to the inbox). But do people really feel this is needed? In my experience, is less than 10 messages of spam per day, so it's easier to me to press DEL (which is a function of my "stupid" MUA) that few times than to install, train, and maintain a spam filter software. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 19:32:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2E9131A for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x233.google.com (mail-yk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CD84B9C for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f179.google.com with SMTP id 9so1634094ykp.10 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:32:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=SiPMyt/3u6ahSduKgRm7CdleTNSKZdUogcNXe7+vqIU=; b=DLbkZUEiBDOKWNZZnQ4dL2VI5JL1TbjchC+lmnKj0w3YjcLH5AHrkCSdfvCAzw2o2j 7QcCQ4VHmu+OKJ3voFB2yQev/bxaQpUtxwPXXEY5vhWnd4BEeeJ1XeNLIuoMA2kqQwPp kxOUP7H+CtQW7OOxjO384kNjCaCpU1oyao1YDSsTD981DWUtBPciss8Kytou05FMmCml cdMl45mQ09QtZLAMrzsiuf7GFX1/LprUYFjanhHK5xFklFerVv2sn9IiAeqo1LVOf5JB dE1HkkN4tfoxC+FA4Mq2C0L5LBRgB27EDPHfy4NAjGbPlJd19nicWKm2IcVBALd71wRB pxAg== X-Received: by 10.236.110.138 with SMTP id u10mr6800014yhg.134.1423596728666; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:32:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from k8-bsd.hsd1.ga.comcast.net ([2601:0:4600:611:2ed0:5aff:fe78:91ca]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id f45sm10435037yhf.28.2015.02.10.11.32.08 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:32:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:32:41 -0500 From: R0B_ROD To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Spam Message-ID: <20150210193241.GA31848@k8-bsd.hsd1.ga.comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:32:09 -0000 I understand the discussion but why isnt anyone coding anything for it already??? To the person who began the thread: How is it that a simple delete of a few emails with 'd' in mutt is a lot of work for you? I have gotten 4-5 spam mails from this list in the past 6 weeks. If it bothers you come and help out, make some stuff up, even pseudo code on paper and pencil...Lets motivated each other instead of ranting and complaining or dreaming. Lets do it. Arent we a bunch of UNIX-wizards?? Trust me that is I had remotely the skill that many of you have and I could come up with a basic local shell script to filter out some spam. :) XD :P Peace From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 19:32:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B3CF420 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:32:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.radel.com (fly.radel.com [70.184.242.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC22FBB5 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:32:48 +0000 (UTC) X-CGP-ClamAV-Result: CLEAN X-VirusScanner: Niversoft's CGPClamav Helper v1.18.5 (ClamAV engine v0.98.5) Received: from [2001:470:880a:4389:6542:69c3:15ae:e1c5] (account jon@radel.com HELO gravenstein.local) by radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.11 _community_) with ESMTPSA id 521209 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:32:37 +0000 Message-ID: <54DA4EC5.5040505@radel.com> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 13:32:37 -0500 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spam References: <20150210155254.736611dc@topdeck.tinsleyviaduct.com> <54DA3BEB.7020400@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54DA3BEB.7020400@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms000107090008080702060607" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:32:49 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms000107090008080702060607 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2/10/15 12:12 PM, zep wrote: > On 02/10/2015 10:52 AM, Phil Reynolds wrote: >> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:29:13 +0100 >> Malcolm Matalka wrote: >> >>> This mailing list produces almost all of the spam I receive. Is there= >>> any plan to reduce the spam? >> The list is open for posting to by non-members. There are reasons for >> this, but this also means it is open to spam. Annoying, but nothing >> that can really be done about it. > I don't know that that's true/accurate. there might not be anything > that can easily be done about it but there are a wide range of spam > catching programs and other methodologies that could be implemented. > You mean like the ones I have implemented that filter out almost all the = spam on this list and leave me little residue but the endless and=20 relatively pointless chatter on the topic? Read the archives. The folks = who run the lists have their policies. Some people are convinced they=20 could do better. They quite possibly could. But they don't run the=20 lists. So stop spamming me about spam. And, yes, the horse really is de= ad. --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms000107090008080702060607 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIILBDCC BRowggQCoAMCAQICEG0Z6qcZT2ozIuYiMnqqcd4wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQAwga4xCzAJBgNV BAYTAlVTMQswCQYDVQQIEwJVVDEXMBUGA1UEBxMOU2FsdCBMYWtlIENpdHkxHjAcBgNVBAoT FVRoZSBVU0VSVFJVU1QgTmV0d29yazEhMB8GA1UECxMYaHR0cDovL3d3dy51c2VydHJ1c3Qu Y29tMTYwNAYDVQQDEy1VVE4tVVNFUkZpcnN0LUNsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQg RW1haWwwHhcNMTEwNDI4MDAwMDAwWhcNMjAwNTMwMTA0ODM4WjCBkzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0Ix GzAZBgNVBAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UE ChMRQ09NT0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxOTA3BgNVBAMTMENPTU9ETyBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGlj YXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoC ggEBAJKEhFtLV5jUXi+LpOFAyKNTWF9mZfEyTvefMn1V0HhMVbdClOD5J3EHxcZppLkyxPFA GpDMJ1Zifxe1cWmu5SAb5MtjXmDKokH2auGj/7jfH0htZUOMKi4rYzh337EXrMLaggLW1DJq 1GdvIBOPXDX65VSAr9hxCh03CgJQU2yVHakQFLSZlVkSMf8JotJM3FLb3uJAAVtIaN3FSrTg 7SQfOq9xXwfjrL8UO7AlcWg99A/WF1hGFYE8aIuLgw9teiFX5jSw2zJ+40rhpVJyZCaRTqWS D//gsWD9Gm9oUZljjRqLpcxCm5t9ImPTqaD8zp6Q30QZ9FxbNboW86eb/8ECAwEAAaOCAUsw ggFHMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFImCZ33EnSZwAEu0UEh83j2uBG59MB0GA1UdDgQWBBR6E04AdFvG eGNkJ8Ev4qBbvHnFezAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAQYwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADARBgNV HSAECjAIMAYGBFUdIAAwWAYDVR0fBFEwTzBNoEugSYZHaHR0cDovL2NybC51c2VydHJ1c3Qu Y29tL1VUTi1VU0VSRmlyc3QtQ2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGljYXRpb25hbmRFbWFpbC5jcmwwdAYI KwYBBQUHAQEEaDBmMD0GCCsGAQUFBzAChjFodHRwOi8vY3J0LnVzZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20vVVRO QWRkVHJ1c3RDbGllbnRfQ0EuY3J0MCUGCCsGAQUFBzABhhlodHRwOi8vb2NzcC51c2VydHJ1 c3QuY29tMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBBQUAA4IBAQCF1r54V1VtM39EUv5C1QaoAQOAivsNsv1Kv/av QUn1G1rF0q0bc24+6SZ85kyYwTAo38v7QjyhJT4KddbQPTmGZtGhm7VNm2+vKGwdr+XqdFqo 2rHA8XV6L566k3nK/uKRHlZ0sviN0+BDchvtj/1gOSBH+4uvOmVIPJg9pSW/ve9g4EnlFsjr P0OD8ODuDcHTzTNfm9C9YGqzO/761Mk6PB/tm/+bSTO+Qik5g+4zaS6CnUVNqGnagBsePdIa XXxHmaWbCG0SmYbWXVcHG6cwvktJRLiQfsrReTjrtDP6oDpdJlieYVUYtCHVmdXgQ0BCML7q peeU0rD+83X5f27nMIIF4jCCBMqgAwIBAgIQUaWQdTU6RvxxeOjTUN4DtDANBgkqhkiG9w0B AQUFADCBkzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4G A1UEBxMHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09NT0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxOTA3BgNVBAMTMENP TU9ETyBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQTAeFw0xMjAz MjcwMDAwMDBaFw0xNTAzMjcyMzU5NTlaMIH6MQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzEOMAwGA1UEERMFMjIx NTAxCzAJBgNVBAgTAlZBMRQwEgYDVQQHEwtTcHJpbmdmaWVsZDEaMBgGA1UECRMRNjkxNyBS aWRnZXdheSBEci4xFTATBgNVBAoTDEpvbiBULiBSYWRlbDEyMDAGA1UECxMpSXNzdWVkIHRo cm91Z2ggSm9uIFQuIFJhZGVsIEUtUEtJIE1hbmFnZXIxHzAdBgNVBAsTFkNvcnBvcmF0ZSBT ZWN1cmUgRW1haWwxEjAQBgNVBAMTCUpvbiBSYWRlbDEcMBoGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYNam9uQHJh ZGVsLmNvbTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAMuufqoh9QnyjZTH7UdO wpx6XnRz/94zoK1C1SaAepIRMyInXiwOVwT7iXKtkeRGEQA2vwTyqu5JVcvWkGxlTWPACgDW dDE3296Up2K9CFfrm+RKdlc6xfMklR7qQWyNw5ULkeOZZOIoSAlVAJPhjIvHcf0UPxjTqgtP 4JafBBvL8RFhMAm74I1kWltMcFPVm1sLFDR1CDZ48/zqmhK/0ppbiBGapi8vAO382laFgHaN 8ODBFBffom5zjL/I9SggGGAdtwi7Vp2cjzgtuNVyORPv5Jz9zLylVKlhNvyq3VjbWXuJNw0E J03F/UkjQsqsCkQnSdHAxtPkGhoBw/UvqEsCAwEAAaOCAccwggHDMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFHoT TgB0W8Z4Y2QnwS/ioFu8ecV7MB0GA1UdDgQWBBR8oxwxzLSB4/equQ4EqdH5Fld3sTAOBgNV HQ8BAf8EBAMCBaAwDAYDVR0TAQH/BAIwADAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDBAYIKwYBBQUH AwIwRgYDVR0gBD8wPTA7BgwrBgEEAbIxAQIBAwUwKzApBggrBgEFBQcCARYdaHR0cHM6Ly9z ZWN1cmUuY29tb2RvLm5ldC9DUFMwVwYDVR0fBFAwTjBMoEqgSIZGaHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21v ZG9jYS5jb20vQ09NT0RPQ2xpZW50QXV0aGVudGljYXRpb25hbmRTZWN1cmVFbWFpbENBLmNy bDCBiAYIKwYBBQUHAQEEfDB6MFIGCCsGAQUFBzAChkZodHRwOi8vY3J0LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNv bS9DT01PRE9DbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbmFuZFNlY3VyZUVtYWlsQ0EuY3J0MCQGCCsG AQUFBzABhhhodHRwOi8vb2NzcC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20wGAYDVR0RBBEwD4ENam9uQHJhZGVs LmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOCAQEAJB+JWM2MbG5rR7/RCEm8bQRziBfl/FztfoV6dDGU Y0uTRegiwM2LA/GHGju7xtp49MrcmEciZs6Di2pvGzS5m/v5IBT0gMK6dyplBmBe4BXzwckE 1MH/iui+VstVHds+36SsQqPCtVmFWlX6QN56F6aGSCjI27f2mUYL3NBr6DPsslRIhF9PamKQ Bp4Y25/hnd+paEGIF6AZM3Uv7TvsTdCaBOt3dLrwUIpyQex5yqO8GPKWwgEPKxKiro7uLNNY yZU4dEEenQIi/4SD49XHd9Zqwf60jKVPeZjcrK7QSSQ8dlOYOGH60WBBFVwD1CCBCLSJnglY Dwh5wcgQG9ZRvjGCBBkwggQVAgEBMIGoMIGTMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3Jl YXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVyMRAwDgYDVQQHEwdTYWxmb3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0Eg TGltaXRlZDE5MDcGA1UEAxMwQ09NT0RPIENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgU2Vj dXJlIEVtYWlsIENBAhBRpZB1NTpG/HF46NNQ3gO0MAkGBSsOAwIaBQCgggJFMBgGCSqGSIb3 DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0BBwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTE1MDIxMDE4MzIzN1owIwYJKoZI hvcNAQkEMRYEFPKqj0yjwriHwU9Ob3WznGAH7CfQMGwGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFfMF0wCwYJYIZI AWUDBAEqMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBAjAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZI hvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgbkGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGBqzCBqDCB kzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMH U2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09NT0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxOTA3BgNVBAMTMENPTU9ETyBD bGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQQIQUaWQdTU6RvxxeOjT UN4DtDCBuwYLKoZIhvcNAQkQAgsxgauggagwgZMxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJH cmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBD QSBMaW1pdGVkMTkwNwYDVQQDEzBDT01PRE8gQ2xpZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBT ZWN1cmUgRW1haWwgQ0ECEFGlkHU1Okb8cXjo01DeA7QwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEAlRJH anbm7ryUzBHa+VWZBKPOL9PZPuPp6GzUkFI5lsYmDKTU9kp0w81qVbTtEwY47Vu73tLUzPHs Z9align9kLUhGsoOD9Ofj22WhOQ6BlnVCyJ9w+R0SJPTBIW04zjujOgugkvtJuGFnwwoD4h2 U1EIKqEOZwfjkkd3Ms+GLofbw6zXDt7EC0iKOE/J9zL4oNRciqp16YwdWjZOswqxWMVxLB3s yRxrMHGgDDMnNwpaX1BENwAw9c/hIbkllC+a6JJebiS7tsd/lkNu7wKf8pctuoeRSIxdbiHL a6eJTpjrGijBWAGNxvldRza8nihbZqAypzuUZLEfnrVZo5ZjuwAAAAAAAA== --------------ms000107090008080702060607-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 19:34:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C43B4501 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x22b.google.com (mail-yk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78ED0BF1 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 10so15217210ykt.2 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:34:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=5cxf1QnsjSTppBl4KmBNHc3qKEJ2MaylrKx8/CmiuFA=; b=OP5LgIhf91pBMHk51zAlUO97N1OO6CGbMIVcUgH3P4BX3Fhwz7jiEX0m0fI22vfmR6 93s26sYQTlEPxsEQH8zI9q1kjsHM0K5YPAt94UA6CfEcANKQCFVawnZAWnpmofOoUU4y jLLm9Eaalb8QN/FuLFyb3QR0KrBTTPJnDbJPPqfj8KNE5g5kWonoRM4z5sfzrIR+5NM5 frbr74teVBuRVAxo18yPaUE+jwU+M0I2zYpkhso4cX9UsAPK7jAvCMXn2FH/iHjvE8Wj MVCetSuEog1A/wGai5300zzq11RgOHn4McTULO7u/HHvltdKLZaispSeqdSpM7S9jddv ZbvQ== X-Received: by 10.236.209.65 with SMTP id r41mr9476365yho.152.1423596898788; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:34:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from k8-bsd.hsd1.ga.comcast.net ([2601:0:4600:611:2ed0:5aff:fe78:91ca]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 35sm10437338yhu.32.2015.02.10.11.34.58 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:34:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:35:32 -0500 From: R0B_ROD To: Jon Radel Subject: Re: Spam Message-ID: <20150210193532.GA32471@k8-bsd.hsd1.ga.comcast.net> References: <20150210155254.736611dc@topdeck.tinsleyviaduct.com> <54DA3BEB.7020400@gmail.com> <54DA4EC5.5040505@radel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54DA4EC5.5040505@radel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:34:59 -0000 On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 01:32:37PM -0500, Jon Radel wrote: > On 2/10/15 12:12 PM, zep wrote: > > On 02/10/2015 10:52 AM, Phil Reynolds wrote: > >> On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:29:13 +0100 > >> Malcolm Matalka wrote: > >> > >>> This mailing list produces almost all of the spam I receive. Is there > >>> any plan to reduce the spam? > >> The list is open for posting to by non-members. There are reasons for > >> this, but this also means it is open to spam. Annoying, but nothing > >> that can really be done about it. > > I don't know that that's true/accurate. there might not be anything > > that can easily be done about it but there are a wide range of spam > > catching programs and other methodologies that could be implemented. > > > > You mean like the ones I have implemented that filter out almost all the > spam on this list and leave me little residue but the endless and > relatively pointless chatter on the topic? Read the archives. The folks > who run the lists have their policies. Some people are convinced they > could do better. They quite possibly could. But they don't run the > lists. So stop spamming me about spam. And, yes, the horse really is dead. > > > --Jon Radel > jon@radel.com > Understood. Glad I have clarity that there are policies. I am new to the community forgive me. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 19:36:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C7DA5A7; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:36:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com (mail-wi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7652C0A; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:36:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id hm9so16820978wib.5; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:36:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=q1t49HsNL+hcKU2wK6cPoeGwvfTwJIiDxON3GxhLmjs=; b=TPBMYjO+Ua9RLiDLW6Zt2lZOdeTP1R+prYEUwE0RJsV0vOg63EUZaITPJINwEkpWSJ TIAv7P32xUyRPC9MNGPeln3aCyYsUyMJQUrfd8ZRlRP9KQ08/5gFLe6jZjdwjZV6OdW8 6leanQlc5mVzg5sUdMQXDrB9nwUbACjev99bbfIOUwGj0Qj7LjM3T1zYBJSi1CNzV0rb DzZCXzfoJIW5wcD7UXdTUL+Qo8QVGWdKH7Qire8wnbBPRf6AIM7isUXN0Xw7bpj6UM6K xaroJnKDUlxvRxVeyDznJf3ENjLq3ZN3qloVEkpNJIyVwWcQZNg70A7i3A0usjSMjuLj oTfQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.10.68 with SMTP id g4mr56149283wjb.5.1423596976080; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:36:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.157.69 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:36:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54D92EED.8060001@FreeBSD.org> References: <54D92EED.8060001@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:36:16 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: obspamd_enable, obspamd_flags From: Chris Stankevitz To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 19:36:18 -0000 On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > It's 'OpenBSD spamd' to distinguish it from 'sa-spamd' which is part of > SpamAssassin. Got it, thank you. > The answers to your third and fourth questions are to be found in the > spamd(8) man page -- meaning you should type: I used trial and error to determine that obspamd_flags is the name of the rc.conf variable used to pass flags to spamd. I found no indication in 'man 8 spamd' that obspamd_flags is a valid variable name within rc.conf. I also could find no reference in 'man rc.conf'. It's probably no surprise that I guessed obspamd_flags: after all I knew obspamd_enable was a valid variable from pkg-message.in. I guess I was just looking for something more authoritative than "guess and check". Thank you for your help, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 20:16:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4139F505 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:16:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x22a.google.com (mail-yk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDCEB96 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:16:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f170.google.com with SMTP id q9so15340565ykb.1 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:16:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=NLY3J464SQopCc9maMNUoXdVeog49CFUYppktoSo67I=; b=ofR5DDtXNPVtoWo3SZK8atTOcwEBLRNbD1fIfi8tONUxo0gT7uqx6UOg/4kSSrIho1 1ITtz81rPoU4BJOZLnvZTN614OgG9zno4Ufp03LEpcmVeND2Atx0gWnXcwJH6R4xV9sd gxy0HaxTYVb7dIdabwCKZaJkzPmtZXPOJBYNbHmv4GA2bvjm5TeEqDyrYo+P+AldA83+ u+P5thcNmryHiDxdJ8X7mQ07kqVwD1U4GHLYw9f5zWaMmj4l0X3XHugfo8RiPvWfy5X4 6ME/04HmCm97YgZ9NUAepNJgY06OBJl+sg4j/1iA9n5plv+DWUNwNAXC8v2MTGOyOLSi WrGw== X-Received: by 10.236.36.65 with SMTP id v41mr6402550yha.102.1423599408108; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:16:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from k8-bsd.hsd1.ga.comcast.net ([2601:0:4600:611:2ed0:5aff:fe78:91ca]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o30sm10512370yha.37.2015.02.10.12.16.47 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:16:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:17:21 -0500 From: R0B_ROD To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Custom Kernel build and ZFS prefetch Message-ID: <20150210201721.GA45296@k8-bsd.hsd1.ga.comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 20:16:49 -0000 # kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 40 0xffffffff80200000 e340d8 kernel 2 1 0xffffffff81035000 2f9740 zfs.ko 3 2 0xffffffff8132f000 6678 opensolaris.ko 4 1 0xffffffff81411000 119559 radeonkms.ko 5 1 0xffffffff8152b000 48587 drm2.ko 6 4 0xffffffff81574000 22b6 iicbus.ko 7 1 0xffffffff81577000 1a56 iic.ko 8 1 0xffffffff81579000 1e4a iicbb.ko 9 1 0xffffffff8157b000 18f1 radeonkmsfw_PALM_pfp.ko 10 1 0xffffffff8157d000 1cee radeonkmsfw_PALM_me.ko 11 1 0xffffffff8157f000 136c radeonkmsfw_SUMO_rlc.ko # uname -a FreeBSD k8-bsd 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0: Mon Feb 9 20:42:19 EST 2015 root@k8-bsd:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MDFK4.2 amd64 KERNCONF: profile 2 cpu HAMMER ident MDFK makeoptions DEBUG=-g # Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols makeoptions WITH_CTF=1 # Run ctfconvert(1) for DTrace support options SCHED_ULE # ULE scheduler options PREEMPTION # Enable kernel thread preemption options INET # InterNETworking options INET6 # IPv6 communications protocols options TCP_OFFLOAD # TCP offload options SCTP # Stream Control Transmission Protocol options FFS # Berkeley Fast Filesystem options SOFTUPDATES # Enable FFS soft updates support options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories options UFS_GJOURNAL # Enable gjournal-based UFS journaling options QUOTA # Enable disk quotas for UFS options MD_ROOT # MD is a potential root device options NFSCL # New Network Filesystem Client options NFSD # New Network Filesystem Server options NFSLOCKD # Network Lock Manager options NFS_ROOT # NFS usable as /, requires NFSCL options MSDOSFS # MSDOS Filesystem options CD9660 # ISO 9660 Filesystem options PROCFS # Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS) options PSEUDOFS # Pseudo-filesystem framework options GEOM_PART_GPT # GUID Partition Tables. options GEOM_LABEL # Provides labelization options COMPAT_FREEBSD32 # Compatible with i386 binaries options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4 options COMPAT_FREEBSD5 # Compatible with FreeBSD5 options COMPAT_FREEBSD6 # Compatible with FreeBSD6 options COMPAT_FREEBSD7 # Compatible with FreeBSD7 options SCSI_DELAY=5000 # Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI options KTRACE # ktrace(1) support options STACK # stack(9) support options SYSVSHM # SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG # SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM # SYSV-style semaphores options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B real-time extensions options PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=128 # Prevent printf output being interspersed. options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev options HWPMC_HOOKS # Necessary kernel hooks for hwpmc(4) options AUDIT # Security event auditing options CAPABILITY_MODE # Capsicum capability mode options CAPABILITIES # Capsicum capabilities options PROCDESC # Support for process descriptors options MAC # TrustedBSD MAC Framework options KDTRACE_FRAME # Ensure frames are compiled in options KDTRACE_HOOKS # Kernel DTrace hooks options DDB_CTF # Kernel ELF linker loads CTF data options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE # Include this file in kernel # Debugging support. Always need this: options KDB # Enable kernel debugger support. options KDB_TRACE # Print a stack trace for a panic. # Make an SMP-capable kernel by default options SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel # CPU frequency control, temp device cpufreq device cpuctl # Bus support. device agp device acpi options ACPI_DMAR device pci # ATA controllers device ahci # AHCI-compatible SATA controllers device ata options ATA_STATIC_ID # Static device numbering # ATA/SCSI peripherals device scbus # SCSI bus (required for ATA/SCSI) device da # Direct Access (disks) device cd # CD device pass # Passthrough device (direct ATA/SCSI access) # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller device atkbd # AT keyboard device psm # PS/2 mouse device kbdmux # keyboard multiplexer # Video device vga # VGA video card driver device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support options VESA # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console device sc options SC_PIXEL_MODE # add support for the raster text mode # vt is the new video console driver device vt device vt_vga device vt_efifb # Wireless NIC cards device bpf # Needed for wlan0 & DHCP device wlan # 802.11 support options IEEE80211_DEBUG # enable debug msgs options IEEE80211_AMPDU_AGE # age frames in AMPDU reorder q's options IEEE80211_SUPPORT_MESH # enable 802.11s draft support device wlan_wep # 802.11 WEP support device wlan_ccmp # 802.11 CCMP support device wlan_tkip # 802.11 TKIP support device wlan_amrr # AMRR transmit rate control algorithm device ath # Atheros NICs device ath_pci # Atheros pci/cardbus glue device ath_hal # pci/cardbus chip support options ATH_ENABLE_11N # Enable 802.11n support for AR5416 and later device ath_rate_sample # SampleRate tx rate control for ath # PCI-E NIC device miibus device re # 8101 Realtek # MMC/SD !NO-SUPPORT-YET device mmc device mmcsd device sdhci # Pseudo devices. device loop # Network loopback device random # Entropy device device padlock_rng # VIA Padlock RNG device rdrand_rng # Intel Bull Mountain RNG device ether # Ethernet support device vlan # 802.1Q VLAN support device tun # Packet tunnel. device md # Memory "disks" device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling device faith # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation) device firmware # firmware assist module # USB support options USB_DEBUG # enable debug msgs device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface device ehci # EHCI PCI->USB interface (USB 2.0) device xhci # XHCI PCI->USB interface (USB 3.0) device usb # USB Bus (required) device ukbd # Keyboard device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da # Sound support device sound # Generic sound driver (required) device snd_hda # Intel High Definition Audio # VirtIO support device virtio # Generic VirtIO bus (required) device virtio_pci # VirtIO PCI device device vtnet # VirtIO Ethernet device device virtio_blk # VirtIO Block device device virtio_scsi # VirtIO SCSI device device virtio_balloon # VirtIO Memory Balloon device device hyperv EOF I was curious if I can compile the modules above into the kernel and if that would be a good idea. I have made 6 kernels so far just cuz I keep reinstalling to learn more. Im on Root-on-ZFS this time and I can really tell a speed difference in building and making ports. Also I have 4gb of RAM with 4gb swap and was wondering if enabling the "vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0" would help if any. Comments? Thanks for the help. # cat loader.conf kern.geom.label.gptid.enable="0" zfs_load="YES" hw.vga.textmode=0 kern.vty=vt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 21:33:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92911DE1 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:33:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E0E1BB2 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:33:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YLIQn-0000uP-0H for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:33:17 +0100 Received: from 65.75.36.70 ([65.75.36.70]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:33:16 +0100 Received: from gyliamos by 65.75.36.70 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:33:16 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Will Parsons Subject: Re: Spam Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:33:10 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: <20150210155254.736611dc@topdeck.tinsleyviaduct.com> Reply-To: gyliamos@gmail.com X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.75.36.70 User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:33:26 -0000 Phil Reynolds wrote: > On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:29:13 +0100 > Malcolm Matalka wrote: > >> This mailing list produces almost all of the spam I receive. Is there >> any plan to reduce the spam? > > The list is open for posting to by non-members. There are reasons for > this, but this also means it is open to spam. Annoying, but nothing > that can really be done about it. One possibility is to use Gmane and a newsreader to access the mailing list. That's what I do, and I have no problem at all with spam. -- Will From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 23:00:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4500F942 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:00:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp205.alice.it (smtp205.alice.it [82.57.200.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9024834 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:00:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from soth.ventu (79.50.25.5) by smtp205.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 547D8A4D0F3C6BD1 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:55:44 +0100 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1AMtWwW089996 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:55:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <54DA8C63.8000303@netfence.it> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:55:31 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clarifications on ACPI driver References: <54D25DF1.9030603@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:00:56 -0000 On 02/04/15 21:50, Michael Powell wrote: > Andrea Venturoli wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> I read in the handbook (12.13.1) "the acpi(4) driver is loaded by >> default at system boot and should *not* be compiled into the kernel". >> >> Yet I see "device acpi" in GENERIC. > > This is only so for the 32-bit i386 build. You will not see this in the 64- > bit x86_64 build. Uh??? > # cd /usr/src/ > # svn update > Updating '.': > At revision 278542. > # svn status > # svn info > Path: . > Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src > URL: https://svn0.eu.freebsd.org/base/releng/10.1 > Relative URL: ^/releng/10.1 > Repository Root: https://svn0.eu.freebsd.org/base > Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f > Revision: 278542 > Node Kind: directory > Schedule: normal > Last Changed Author: delphij > Last Changed Rev: 277808 > Last Changed Date: 2015-01-27 20:37:02 +0100 (Tue, 27 Jan 2015) > > # grep -i acpi sys/i386/conf/GENERIC > device acpi > # grep -i acpi sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC > device acpi > options ACPI_DMAR > # As you can see "device acpi" is present in both i386's and amd64's GENERIC. bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 23:09:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DC40E21 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yh0-x229.google.com (mail-yh0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7DBC8A3 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:09:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f41.google.com with SMTP id 29so47608yhl.0 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:09:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=q9O4FIAtalPYvj4gIdQLWNW7wGpP5teQrmp5cv5bdDs=; b=I+mEA9RWUzcXK57NMZB1WNFpsLIWcxIbw5wPsBgdmh1PlaY1l+CBlT5eWDiVXGq6Xx 8iuSNkfEfnsfHYud+lE28UCak1BMfpyjHIJWuXjBr9d6FWFsXfSlvQiHgr1DWkHNNZt8 csRPWDd4EIIOobpE8xT6Fv5wL0W3eQQyaHkxHkGFKpFE6hrZq1AKf6g1dKOURzxV7FCE KxeI9wrQTOGwmhr7nuQrjz1fgKm1utIpPfaVk8/AGoCsqVephkM1cgRXXs4OE7K0jZaw vZLV+I3oOdwh/5EZ0vVatjXIxE171j47dpI4986IvlDQMNHLzXuIYYrF011Uv2dRRpqi nRlQ== X-Received: by 10.236.222.232 with SMTP id t98mr10167551yhp.122.1423609784866; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:09:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from k8-bsd.hsd1.ga.comcast.net ([2601:0:4600:611:2ed0:5aff:fe78:91ca]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q13sm10864203yhb.4.2015.02.10.15.09.44 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:09:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:10:17 -0500 From: R0B_ROD To: Andrea Venturoli Subject: Re: Clarifications on ACPI driver Message-ID: <20150210231017.GA89620@k8-bsd.hsd1.ga.comcast.net> References: <54D25DF1.9030603@netfence.it> <54DA8C63.8000303@netfence.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54DA8C63.8000303@netfence.it> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:09:46 -0000 On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 11:55:31PM +0100, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 02/04/15 21:50, Michael Powell wrote: > > Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > > >> Hello. > >> > >> I read in the handbook (12.13.1) "the acpi(4) driver is loaded by > >> default at system boot and should *not* be compiled into the kernel". > >> > >> Yet I see "device acpi" in GENERIC. I have built 6 kernels with 'device acpi' on AMD64 E-300 HP 2000-2b19WM all have worked fine. Its like you said it was in GENERIC. I use FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE. ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 23:43:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE35D9C9 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:43:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7BE8C90 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:43:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=vgwOrsFn0/8r8AF4EKubkRkKnKaowxj754gzSofxWjY=; b=M4HKXmisyNnWXLKDRJS++bJ5+d4WAVhXcCFsk1aPrf/3W08lNfPLYIG8niA/1G7MPPrU5y7rsHKhLQo8AnwbXTp7+uJSb61ANT7ojNFPCLqMfJn7NYx3VUaNzx+i6JbpTUBYH5sFxS/xjeQhrIPeuX4+YzKAsEQKneGAhoKXG7Q=; Received: from [114.121.158.163] (port=60891 helo=B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YLKSP-002KI4-0T; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 16:43:06 -0700 Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 07:42:58 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: R0B_ROD Subject: Re: Spam Message-ID: <20150211074258.115f0014@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <20150210193241.GA31848@k8-bsd.hsd1.ga.comcast.net> References: <20150210193241.GA31848@k8-bsd.hsd1.ga.comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:43:12 -0000 Hi, On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:32:41 -0500 R0B_ROD wrote: > I understand the discussion but why isnt anyone coding anything for > it already??? To the person who began the thread: How is it that a out of a very simple reason. The spam coming directly from the list is minor. But there are harvesters active and they send out spam to the harvested addresses. > simple delete of a few emails with 'd' in mutt is a lot of work for > you? I have gotten 4-5 spam mails from this list in the past 6 weeks. Yes, and today more than 20 claiming to come from this list. They can easily be filtered and go directly into a folder marking them as spam from FreeBSD. This make it easier for me to find false positives even if I did not have one since I started the filtering. > If it bothers you come and help out, make some stuff up, even pseudo > code on paper and pencil...Lets motivated each other instead of > ranting and complaining or dreaming. Lets do it. Arent we a bunch of > UNIX-wizards?? Trust me that is I had remotely the skill that many of > you have and I could come up with a basic local shell script to > filter out some spam. :) XD :P Peace > The people who did claws mail did already the work. It is just about applying it. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 23:53:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 547F6C1C for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:53:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yk0-x22b.google.com (mail-yk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D44BDD1 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:53:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yk0-f171.google.com with SMTP id 10so104924ykt.2 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:53:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=jkCzz4/CRPuGSG6uLtVFednxtGaig6dJZnsqeB2dg+I=; b=Wt1dQOehrRCZi75n2UOtF0YugXBLeHQYeABrorxaMjAchVid+N5/7PzdfS/pWTrgx8 P2fGZJm8zDX0XvcsDqCiJeovMN681WusceUhzJ//M4HhyrnExfo7l0gY7YUryQ3F+sdS I3fsQfc0CEuOxzqhYkocLGJy7Zk8CWJFxUvlGI9g1US51kB5WF8Xdf6dwfjVvmpwInE4 GUNj5VzcIQrBZajqdNlhOoTfje4MmoHTuWXqH+JhXAf1C21lfpAwXWXAylUQK4Y5gJV3 O4pQS4vZc/lTtJ/X6xSFZWI3lxtneaGBXwXnHmK+beyHT7cEFxAIQ1RzUZNO7AQ5v5K7 NyqQ== X-Received: by 10.236.26.210 with SMTP id c58mr816924yha.72.1423612394167; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:53:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from k8-bsd.hsd1.ga.comcast.net ([2601:0:4600:611:2ed0:5aff:fe78:91ca]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b38sm10943323yha.3.2015.02.10.15.53.13 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:53:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:53:47 -0500 From: R0B_ROD To: Erich Dollansky Subject: Re: Spam Message-ID: <20150210235347.GA61384@k8-bsd.hsd1.ga.comcast.net> References: <20150210193241.GA31848@k8-bsd.hsd1.ga.comcast.net> <20150211074258.115f0014@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150211074258.115f0014@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:53:15 -0000 On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 07:42:58AM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:32:41 -0500 > R0B_ROD wrote: > > > I understand the discussion but why isnt anyone coding anything for > > it already??? To the person who began the thread: How is it that a > > out of a very simple reason. The spam coming directly from the list is > minor. But there are harvesters active and they send out spam to the > harvested addresses. > > > simple delete of a few emails with 'd' in mutt is a lot of work for > > you? I have gotten 4-5 spam mails from this list in the past 6 weeks. > > Yes, and today more than 20 claiming to come from this list. They can > easily be filtered and go directly into a folder marking them as spam > from FreeBSD. This make it easier for me to find false positives even > if I did not have one since I started the filtering. > > > If it bothers you come and help out, make some stuff up, even pseudo > > code on paper and pencil...Lets motivated each other instead of > > ranting and complaining or dreaming. Lets do it. Arent we a bunch of > > UNIX-wizards?? Trust me that is I had remotely the skill that many of > > you have and I could come up with a basic local shell script to > > filter out some spam. :) XD :P Peace > > > The people who did claws mail did already the work. It is just about > applying it. > > Erich j/k I really haven't gotten into any emails. Felt like messing with ya. :) -Roberto From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 23:53:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B88BCA6 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:53:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA70ADDD for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:53:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YLKcl-0005Ub-0x for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:53:47 +0100 Received: from vps.jonz.net ([216.17.42.59]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:53:47 +0100 Received: from SPAM_TRAP_gmane by vps.jonz.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:53:47 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jonesy Subject: Re: Spam Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <20150210155254.736611dc@topdeck.tinsleyviaduct.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: vps.jonz.net User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:53:52 -0000 On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 21:33:10 +0000 (UTC), Will Parsons wrote: > Phil Reynolds wrote: >> Malcolm Matalka wrote: >> >>> This mailing list produces almost all of the spam I receive. Is there >>> any plan to reduce the spam? >> >> The list is open for posting to by non-members. There are reasons for >> this, but this also means it is open to spam. Annoying, but nothing >> that can really be done about it. > > One possibility is to use Gmane and a newsreader to access the mailing > list. That's what I do, and I have no problem at all with spam. +1 I use `slrn` and pull from gmane.os.freebsd.questions As well from a few other Gmane groups. Jonesy -- Marvin L Jones | Marvin | W3DHJ | FreeBSD 38.238N 104.547W | @ jonz.net | Jonesy | linux OS/2 * Killfiling google & XXXXbanter.com: jonz.net/ng.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 02:37:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C5135A1 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 02:37:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mario.brtsvcs.net (mario.brtsvcs.net [199.48.128.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F6DDF32 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 02:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (c-71-59-211-166.hsd1.or.comcast.net [71.59.211.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mario.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 778A02C1613; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 02:37:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:7:2580:181:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29] (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:2580:181:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D73DA268; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:37:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54DAC04C.7010503@bluerosetech.com> Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:37:00 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erich Dollansky , R0B_ROD Subject: Re: Spam References: <20150210193241.GA31848@k8-bsd.hsd1.ga.comcast.net> <20150211074258.115f0014@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <20150211074258.115f0014@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 02:37:19 -0000 On 2015-02-10 15:42, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:32:41 -0500 > R0B_ROD wrote: > >> I understand the discussion but why isnt anyone coding anything for >> it already??? To the person who began the thread: How is it that a > > out of a very simple reason. The spam coming directly from the list is > minor. But there are harvesters active and they send out spam to the > harvested addresses. Which is why list-specific email aliases are so useful. Email to list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com that didn't originate from freebsd.org's servers gets marked as read and filed in my Trash folder. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 08:58:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B62ACD47 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:58:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18DFAEC3 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:58:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t1B8wOKX012170 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:58:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t1B8wNLq012167; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:58:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 09:58:23 +0100 (CET) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: R0B_ROD Subject: Re: Custom Kernel build and ZFS prefetch In-Reply-To: <20150210201721.GA45296@k8-bsd.hsd1.ga.comcast.net> Message-ID: References: <20150210201721.GA45296@k8-bsd.hsd1.ga.comcast.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on mail.fig.ol.no Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:58:33 -0000 On Tue, 10 Feb 2015 15:17-0500, R0B_ROD wrote: > # kldstat >From my own experience some of these modules can be statically compiled in the kernel: > Id Refs Address Size Name > 1 40 0xffffffff80200000 e340d8 kernel > 2 1 0xffffffff81035000 2f9740 zfs.ko > 3 2 0xffffffff8132f000 6678 opensolaris.ko Use options ZFS for zfs.ko and opensolaris.ko. > 4 1 0xffffffff81411000 119559 radeonkms.ko > 5 1 0xffffffff8152b000 48587 drm2.ko > 6 4 0xffffffff81574000 22b6 iicbus.ko > 7 1 0xffffffff81577000 1a56 iic.ko > 8 1 0xffffffff81579000 1e4a iicbb.ko Use: device iicbus device iicbb device ic device iic > 9 1 0xffffffff8157b000 18f1 radeonkmsfw_PALM_pfp.ko > 10 1 0xffffffff8157d000 1cee radeonkmsfw_PALM_me.ko > 11 1 0xffffffff8157f000 136c radeonkmsfw_SUMO_rlc.ko I may be wrong, but I doubt you can have drm2 and radeonkms statically compiled in the kernel. There's a good reason to avoid compiling the KMS drivers in the kernel. In the event of a major bug, it can be beneficial to have a running system with only the VGA driver active. Plus, you can experiment with different versions of the .ko files. At any rate, /usr/src/sys/conf/NOTES and /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/NOTES are your friends. However, you won't find options ZFS mentioned anywhere but in /usr/src/sys/conf/files and even there the option is a bit obscured. > # uname -a > FreeBSD k8-bsd 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0: > Mon Feb 9 20:42:19 EST 2015 > root@k8-bsd:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MDFK4.2 amd64 > > KERNCONF: > > profile 2 > cpu HAMMER > ident MDFK > > makeoptions DEBUG=-g # Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols > makeoptions WITH_CTF=1 # Run ctfconvert(1) for DTrace support > > options SCHED_ULE # ULE scheduler > options PREEMPTION # Enable kernel thread preemption > options INET # InterNETworking > options INET6 # IPv6 communications protocols > options TCP_OFFLOAD # TCP offload > options SCTP # Stream Control Transmission Protocol > options FFS # Berkeley Fast Filesystem > options SOFTUPDATES # Enable FFS soft updates support > options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists > options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories > options UFS_GJOURNAL # Enable gjournal-based UFS journaling > options QUOTA # Enable disk quotas for UFS > options MD_ROOT # MD is a potential root device > options NFSCL # New Network Filesystem Client > options NFSD # New Network Filesystem Server > options NFSLOCKD # Network Lock Manager > options NFS_ROOT # NFS usable as /, requires NFSCL > options MSDOSFS # MSDOS Filesystem > options CD9660 # ISO 9660 Filesystem > options PROCFS # Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS) > options PSEUDOFS # Pseudo-filesystem framework > options GEOM_PART_GPT # GUID Partition Tables. > options GEOM_LABEL # Provides labelization > options COMPAT_FREEBSD32 # Compatible with i386 binaries > options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4 > options COMPAT_FREEBSD5 # Compatible with FreeBSD5 > options COMPAT_FREEBSD6 # Compatible with FreeBSD6 > options COMPAT_FREEBSD7 # Compatible with FreeBSD7 > options SCSI_DELAY=5000 # Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI > options KTRACE # ktrace(1) support > options STACK # stack(9) support > options SYSVSHM # SYSV-style shared memory > options SYSVMSG # SYSV-style message queues > options SYSVSEM # SYSV-style semaphores > options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B real-time extensions > options PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=128 # Prevent printf output being interspersed. > options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev > options HWPMC_HOOKS # Necessary kernel hooks for hwpmc(4) > options AUDIT # Security event auditing > options CAPABILITY_MODE # Capsicum capability mode > options CAPABILITIES # Capsicum capabilities > options PROCDESC # Support for process descriptors > options MAC # TrustedBSD MAC Framework > options KDTRACE_FRAME # Ensure frames are compiled in > options KDTRACE_HOOKS # Kernel DTrace hooks > options DDB_CTF # Kernel ELF linker loads CTF data > options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE # Include this file in kernel > > # Debugging support. Always need this: > options KDB # Enable kernel debugger support. > options KDB_TRACE # Print a stack trace for a panic. > > # Make an SMP-capable kernel by default > options SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel > > # CPU frequency control, temp > device cpufreq > device cpuctl > > # Bus support. > device agp > device acpi > options ACPI_DMAR > device pci > > # ATA controllers > device ahci # AHCI-compatible SATA controllers > device ata > options ATA_STATIC_ID # Static device numbering > > # ATA/SCSI peripherals > device scbus # SCSI bus (required for ATA/SCSI) > device da # Direct Access (disks) > device cd # CD > device pass # Passthrough device (direct ATA/SCSI access) > > # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse > device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller > device atkbd # AT keyboard > > device psm # PS/2 mouse > device kbdmux # keyboard multiplexer > > # Video > device vga # VGA video card driver > device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support > options VESA > > # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console > device sc > options SC_PIXEL_MODE # add support for the raster text mode > > # vt is the new video console driver > device vt > device vt_vga > device vt_efifb > > # Wireless NIC cards > device bpf # Needed for wlan0 & DHCP > device wlan # 802.11 support > options IEEE80211_DEBUG # enable debug msgs > options IEEE80211_AMPDU_AGE # age frames in AMPDU reorder q's > options IEEE80211_SUPPORT_MESH # enable 802.11s draft support > device wlan_wep # 802.11 WEP support > device wlan_ccmp # 802.11 CCMP support > device wlan_tkip # 802.11 TKIP support > device wlan_amrr # AMRR transmit rate control algorithm > device ath # Atheros NICs > device ath_pci # Atheros pci/cardbus glue > device ath_hal # pci/cardbus chip support > options ATH_ENABLE_11N # Enable 802.11n support for AR5416 and later > device ath_rate_sample # SampleRate tx rate control for ath > > # PCI-E NIC > device miibus > device re # 8101 Realtek > > # MMC/SD !NO-SUPPORT-YET > device mmc > device mmcsd > device sdhci > > # Pseudo devices. > device loop # Network loopback > device random # Entropy device > device padlock_rng # VIA Padlock RNG > device rdrand_rng # Intel Bull Mountain RNG > device ether # Ethernet support > device vlan # 802.1Q VLAN support > device tun # Packet tunnel. > device md # Memory "disks" > device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling > device faith # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation) > device firmware # firmware assist module > > > # USB support > options USB_DEBUG # enable debug msgs > device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface > device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface > device ehci # EHCI PCI->USB interface (USB 2.0) > device xhci # XHCI PCI->USB interface (USB 3.0) > device usb # USB Bus (required) > device ukbd # Keyboard > device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da > > # Sound support > device sound # Generic sound driver (required) > device snd_hda # Intel High Definition Audio > > # VirtIO support > device virtio # Generic VirtIO bus (required) > device virtio_pci # VirtIO PCI device > device vtnet # VirtIO Ethernet device > device virtio_blk # VirtIO Block device > device virtio_scsi # VirtIO SCSI device > device virtio_balloon # VirtIO Memory Balloon device > > device hyperv > > EOF > > I was curious if I can compile the modules above into the kernel and > if that would be a good idea. I have made 6 kernels so far just cuz > I keep reinstalling to learn more. Im on Root-on-ZFS this time and I > can really tell a speed difference in building and making ports. > Also I have 4gb of RAM with 4gb swap and was wondering if enabling > the "vfs.zfs.prefetch_disable=0" would help if any. Comments? Thanks > for the help. You really should have more than 4 GiB of memory for any serious use of ZFS. If this system is simply for experimentation and learning, then knock yourself out. > > # cat loader.conf > kern.geom.label.gptid.enable="0" > zfs_load="YES" > hw.vga.textmode=0 > kern.vty=vt -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestl, | Trond Endrestl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 18:38:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0D63DB4 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server1.shellworld.net (shellworld.net [69.60.117.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF90898 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server1.shellworld.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server1.shellworld.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B88122950 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:31:34 -0500 (EST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Question about a Remote DRAC on a Dell Server MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <18636.1423679494.1@server1.shellworld.net> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 12:31:34 -0600 From: "Martin G. McCormick" Message-Id: <20150211183134.3B88122950@server1.shellworld.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:38:06 -0000 We have a new Dell Server running FreeBSD9.3 and our problem is that when trying to operate the system remotely via ipmitool and a command-line console, The FreeBSD kernel displays all boot messages as it should but then we lose contact because the system wants to go to a GUI console which will not work over a text-only channel. I remember discussion of a parameter last Fall, some time, that may have something to do with this behavior. Does this sound familiar to anybody? Thanks for any suggestions. This is a new problem to encounter and appears to be the only thing wrong with the system. Martin McCormick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 18:44:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 708F2F06 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:44:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f176.google.com (mail-ob0-f176.google.com [209.85.214.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A9DE971 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:44:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id wo20so5092591obc.7 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:44:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=HElIYAoC57G9H/jRobjPy/T5KhHsCKIjqOOkzj2LeLc=; b=R4ZDp3KdqOavjiUboG1MB/RyNIFeRlZ/tyyQNQekyE9umc8To2oOBAsiwU9ggNGfwQ uOEH3BEVZwOSTw9TGBgOikg1inIubCfmIliVZJ0YEN7kVjaBb+g2s85z38UDxQuUeVSj QjIwHZlzhPAAoZPmJpIsDbK7ZhMvK3tz/otV8C1NR4BKz0wYMREugadcXdpcLwRGsB6n CUMtIMeKoTzu5iyim+7qbWokPGFCXBnsUJGSOyBALf+Mu+6spjv4xB5IfoPhQZbeRutH T2uxAz3vN4qZcMEFwmZeugghvgWqFECUSGcyPd6pAIxH8hjR/yJQXHGRq3/ikV6NhrPV d0YA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlt21lLkVh292ZvErm03EJF2PTBi6hfFMQgYBfS0j9DhIn57NXzxkKOJXh6pxD5/KkVaSzK MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.71.39 with SMTP id r7mr29647obu.42.1423680247870; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:44:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.33.104 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:44:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150211183134.3B88122950@server1.shellworld.net> References: <20150211183134.3B88122950@server1.shellworld.net> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 10:44:07 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Question about a Remote DRAC on a Dell Server From: Michael Sierchio To: "Martin G. McCormick" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:44:15 -0000 On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Martin G. McCormick wrote: > > We have a new Dell Server running FreeBSD9.3 and our > problem is that when trying to operate the system remotely via > ipmitool and a command-line console, The FreeBSD kernel displays > all boot messages as it should but then we lose contact because > the system wants to go to a GUI console which will not work over > a text-only channel. The problem may simply be your /etc/ttys. You need to turn on getty on one or more of the serial ports. The section for serial terminals on my machine looks like this: # Serial terminals # The 'dialup' keyword identifies dialin lines to login, fingerd etc. ttyu0 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup on secure - M From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 21:00:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7D71FAA for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:00:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com (mail-pd0-f174.google.com [209.85.192.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDF6CC86 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:00:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdbfp1 with SMTP id fp1so6743230pdb.9 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:00:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :date:subject:to; bh=0oQ6VTijvFYBCpyKB887ML7rznRDIfuN8KA9udn2Gug=; b=DXsnyGBCe4dTTPyezaPUE5ogbkKZ11jhThKKaSv9zX02ytaimPjYlZfHxKRybiew5m 3yXWPMpCJMHVpdTUpkSqnlZx2F0p09YdJdnJRxghbUYWQ69FjRNpWdS+5LC8v6bXcuu6 CwYs7LRHcMk1TjGyPzjLktxE0JGe51e2TpcCUNLoZE0J8wLXwRUoyghD5rqOxN92xgqc 7g1UfvMIq3+tunJ17JiM/Pnh2ZKdq93Et5A+84WQ0TMUKhETWpHfsbCk5ARn0yJed6fb Hqca3vkM1PYqor82gIkvNcCqYHA/5r1Va3S4dA7dzxBY/aKTAdLPNiisoIwqA9+0jvoF A+iQ== X-Received: by 10.67.23.101 with SMTP id hz5mr662985pad.47.1423688402299; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:00:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([114.125.14.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wa3sm1775371pac.15.2015.02.11.13.00.00 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:00:01 -0800 (PST) From: 2AE3F4C4 X-Google-Original-From: 2AE3F4C4 X-Mailer: BlackBerry Email (10.2.1.3442) Message-ID: <20150211210000.5865622.28223.575@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 04:00:00 +0700 Subject: Re: Bootloader bombing out with USB disk attached - suggestions? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:00:09 -0000 2AE3F4C4 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 21:00:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A5A3FAC for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:00:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB157C88 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id hz1so6457719pad.9 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:00:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :date:subject:to; bh=17dLRKqUFPo5oiMKp4h6Q4IkzVEFqI36uyX26Hrt4+k=; b=Eso2APEAdOR+Awr/bfCUk/rRxjRG3ckxFleSAbvZXsWuHKyX2OkJLwzfGoqh/14OIs hEJT69lKwNM9SqA+WbJ2/6UvAWQZqQvxtx3IenyaEQacBG96efJn/e1qey19u9nmKaJA 8d0EKgpVEzbtXLxSv6AZx99zW7A4gzY8EOl/wr3qvR0y52ftzZjBzpomdaXCz9BkTOwl 9Clva8Ul4s2WGccGKeV2hMKw6ThS0lNmvzj3c4iqTmMU2vAW5gW9KjMXp/lAT8msWxSP NHt096XJcCTTOwjdloU90NJhhxYP3+aj5RpXzTUWrpG4L1KfP9cKYBxsq3xVRPNyMOKh +bmA== X-Received: by 10.70.49.43 with SMTP id r11mr676522pdn.25.1423688409078; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:00:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([114.125.14.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wa3sm1775371pac.15.2015.02.11.13.00.06 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:00:08 -0800 (PST) From: 2AE3F4C4 X-Google-Original-From: 2AE3F4C4 X-Mailer: BlackBerry Email (10.2.1.3442) Message-ID: <20150211210006.5865622.79165.576@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 04:00:06 +0700 Subject: Re: HP DX5150 and screen-savers To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:00:10 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 21:00:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1609E134 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f181.google.com (mail-pd0-f181.google.com [209.85.192.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E02CBC8C for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdev10 with SMTP id v10so6751521pde.7 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:00:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :date:subject:to; bh=0oQ6VTijvFYBCpyKB887ML7rznRDIfuN8KA9udn2Gug=; b=xTEB1Xli5neZNYh97StMYvIb0FYv+xk0P+pNYj8c3zo72oESjI6/HNE+KinBoLxTed Uz2AiKx69f/ceBFPvq3GCP8r3Cls+Xc7LtKIzdfqJx07oqxffOOhsPJK7rIwMGp1IA1R 5I71JmHQweCJ98Dp5ClRMda3JKDLzLC2whi/pL3eFzzRU7ktotwF5t2FTmmTun4ufACm VtbsKgjtx8UVqECV/iHm2K75Yk02P4M1vTXjHqMJTTyl/cB9W6R6qVhleeonXaOf/ZMJ yksQYIAeOBfrtF+IjMbQsVVAGCcYVwvsbAG1vG69N2KtnlbQxdztAI6wG+3GFUPVzvEM d7YA== X-Received: by 10.70.123.1 with SMTP id lw1mr978709pdb.26.1423688414269; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:00:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([114.125.14.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wa3sm1775371pac.15.2015.02.11.13.00.12 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:00:13 -0800 (PST) From: 2AE3F4C4 X-Google-Original-From: 2AE3F4C4 X-Mailer: BlackBerry Email (10.2.1.3442) Message-ID: <20150211210012.5865622.97481.577@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 04:00:12 +0700 Subject: Re: mplayer configuration question To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:00:15 -0000 2AE3F4C4 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 21:01:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5A7E1E8 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:01:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com (mail-pd0-f170.google.com [209.85.192.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBA55CBA for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:01:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdjg10 with SMTP id g10so6821482pdj.1 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:01:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :date:subject:to; bh=5+DPw70+R1MI01DGcP3nhUil7GY4RfAapPPD0hjSqIE=; b=SrToKjx7OtFYW4ISw+9tzNhz80jbQEdo4cUXGMjjFKqNSyRTNiyAHyawJgO/j22Ivb 3n/720HGWgOCc+RVNKehvD3rFd+9aryNC2u8NrpDY69F7bR5/SGGE1/jZWA2ORUn7K8Z sywZ4ZnxMCkyl72wYeOhqyXnlf4ny4ZMThW3vFkT796XmXSRDIo1Ddmv6UZnsckYbUVI +qkwSj5s6c2QgnStzTiTdQ0RkLbfRdVC2ZDQbDkms5HG+Pjl0b9XTUe33M+nmg/nda2B SnubcIJEoq14CPzeREHWk/7SwF/lZ/vlaO/0zjmZuYDpcTdxKlBQ6QwQs9KDTlshlS8R 3Cqw== X-Received: by 10.68.112.194 with SMTP id is2mr460702pbb.161.1423688500871; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:01:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([114.125.14.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u5sm1721316pdh.54.2015.02.11.13.01.37 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:01:40 -0800 (PST) From: 2AE3F4C4 X-Google-Original-From: 2AE3F4C4 X-Mailer: BlackBerry Email (10.2.1.3442) Message-ID: <20150211210134.5865622.72857.580@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 04:01:34 +0700 Subject: Re: Two local X-servers To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:01:47 -0000 2AE3F4C4 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 21:01:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E75A126B for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f171.google.com (mail-pd0-f171.google.com [209.85.192.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD6A0D4B for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdbfl12 with SMTP id fl12so6785129pdb.4 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:01:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :date:subject:to; bh=0oQ6VTijvFYBCpyKB887ML7rznRDIfuN8KA9udn2Gug=; b=zRhgTWXx6Mj6NRP7VGevPuDHqRr7jYBKi7kOjPxZ7/4L62pTmNRV4jabliLExyqu2G yBf/oMfLu3FAmyjAFKcFWAuBaW2XcZf66mbukeICHMK6aPtvZSiNmM3fUpym4ux840L6 6IuzCkIgqZZL9EZAa18MNt3wNDAsGaNB9/F03AW0SHFS0+FkRgHglCF0NPys5NhUm6pf Sfn1STij2OHSoLOnJLnsgGlHq1Mg9xkZpqDXwXRs+gOYnCFMNhF31pd1FbdXD6MGPzxX MXIhZ/8qHYu9SrE6ubi9w41IxGYpwHPoieY8mTe1oiPW+ns9lP33jAaFiJVoTbdRJJ4q vj3w== X-Received: by 10.66.217.164 with SMTP id oz4mr501971pac.155.1423688513784; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:01:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([114.125.14.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qc8sm1674678pdb.86.2015.02.11.13.01.52 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:01:53 -0800 (PST) From: 2AE3F4C4 X-Google-Original-From: 2AE3F4C4 X-Mailer: BlackBerry Email (10.2.1.3442) Message-ID: <20150211210151.5865622.54264.581@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 04:01:51 +0700 Subject: Re: Two local X-servers To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:02:00 -0000 2AE3F4C4 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 11 21:02:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7AF726C for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com (mail-pd0-f174.google.com [209.85.192.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A038ED4D for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdjp10 with SMTP id p10so6808354pdj.3 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:02:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :date:subject:to; bh=nQUVwxFoCkc7J3zst/EN2Ma6Iq0gMmULVMVaIeSNTyo=; b=f0Fhp5bKDVUsOfGH+CYO0TX7JWgmKMIA9LRgwGxmPzd2yd+Wcwt0ysJduWuxd9p5Jl agnk/6WeYM1OhVXEPvcNwzrxxDPrvu3f4lzVAb1aJIHU1nrQaR7ZL8f5kMVloB3UO8Vp j1C4S+anl16qnnpgX7cA4Vu8A67kdEkEBJ65w6wQVaZGiJXms8dF1b6hqvCW4urIWwi4 IpLFZEgRbwijX5Pe11I5H94crOCEIx9tADKRiziVv3W7PapWu+HYho74EBtMwSGHPzP3 5g4F3XYWqT+tWONsMW1Ykh06YxGt59PhyAUY8Pd8Szx5nI6g85BUXd9ZO421AB4bUfPv y6Zw== X-Received: by 10.68.200.97 with SMTP id jr1mr527102pbc.123.1423688520286; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:02:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([114.125.14.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qc8sm1674678pdb.86.2015.02.11.13.01.58 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 11 Feb 2015 13:01:59 -0800 (PST) From: 2AE3F4C4 X-Google-Original-From: 2AE3F4C4 X-Mailer: BlackBerry Email (10.2.1.3442) Message-ID: <20150211210157.5865622.17825.582@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 04:01:57 +0700 Subject: 2AE3F4C4 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:02:00 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 02:35:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A4A1ADA for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 02:35:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB1C7259 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 02:35:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YLjcN-0001Ix-T7 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 03:35:04 +0100 Received: from vps.jonz.net ([216.17.42.59]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 03:35:03 +0100 Received: from SPAM_TRAP_gmane by vps.jonz.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 03:35:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jonesy Subject: Re: 2AE3F4C4 Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 02:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 6 Message-ID: References: <20150211210157.5865622.17825.582@gmail.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: vps.jonz.net User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 02:35:17 -0000 On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 04:01:57 +0700, 2AE3F4C4 wrote: > the Subject: 2AE3F4C4 = decimal 719,582,404 You're welcome. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 03:09:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 764D72F7 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 03:09:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (pb-sasl1.int.icgroup.com [208.72.237.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 446708F2 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 03:09:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845A937CC1; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:09:11 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:date:subject:to :message-id:mime-version; s=sasl; bh=7fG3wU/wytBaQ+ErnL7dDjx4c/Q =; b=mRWz6Y1nHZpZc+fmWQVhYdpCYGFxOmOeRJA+gEvQoGvrhpAFuuf+/B/RFOW lgm0MUVUBfBC9cZamkQoVHJnMiicUG8SiAZx/leQooSXFUvPlEcoQ8R8M+15TvCb TVC2HpPIMfGkPxxGkL6oJ1VDjBeHbb4LYIvpEWQUWr61LP1w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:date:subject:to :message-id:mime-version; q=dns; s=sasl; b=j3OCR6l3Tq73xiAM6mSDb qyuAqTbY5hvIf55ktA4/euQb0qixkFRpgsOwZAdYtjY+iPTC2wW39VBZhGWkcQcN TOHssWTo+XkvyoBJdhc7b7d2YpsZi8+7H59izFiD1PQdqavruiqZNL8ZRn2GPGSK vjDW4alFlHaF6s+aMq3gVc= Received: from pb-sasl1.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7410937CC0; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:09:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from almini.rcthomas.org (unknown [208.53.120.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B29237CBF; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:09:10 -0500 (EST) From: Rick Thomas Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:09:08 -0800 Subject: How to adjust clock frequency in FreeBSD 10.1 ? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 83FC3A02-B264-11E4-BC03-8FDD009B7A5A-02150157!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 03:09:12 -0000 Hi All, I=92ve got a machine with a really bad clock. When I run NTP on it, the = freq goes straight to 500.0 (over a period of a few days) and stays = there, while the offset grows and grows. I recently switched this machine from Debian Linux to FreeBSD (wanting = to learn more about FreeBSD). Under Linux, I used adjtimex to modify = the TICK value and (once I had converged on the right value) NTP was = able to stabilize the clock. Is there an equivalent hack for FreeBSD? Thanks! Rick= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 05:36:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E9C96C5 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 05:36:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com (mail-pa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B3939DB for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 05:36:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id lf10so8932613pab.12 for ; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:36:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kjpYAPql8USru8lXVBtixwjJZ9/HQnNoCbSf36CTIvQ=; b=d3sUpJiOVF7qPEbySLGbWWLX3loweRQHkV+d/5jwKsTSSx6pM/HEWA7xcglJMrtIdc W5D+ns0MG87WUw8tx3pOfKVmmTUqqCs6sAouWBN1PPZDxgU8ioM4IwSLOmwCPGie10Q3 ILVm2WQpozL1OcH4viRd+ipIIOsWJIJ8OCGgcI7UEkPBNB3hvmFno6uKNnEBaQWm4vIY ZT+hxyDuQui30OFOKE4kTYNeX+SeivGl+RHnM5KvL1TN2s2N+whIemCc2vLnMTARS3U3 k011lKpLtF37WkhU51TC1Nqp3X2wsWfImhMQl4YfroOrxZ+PP3DI/hlOtcViCeIfAqzL WSwA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.200.36 with SMTP id jp4mr3280160pbc.153.1423719384930; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:36:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.110.134 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:36:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:36:24 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to adjust clock frequency in FreeBSD 10.1 ? From: Adam Vande More To: Rick Thomas Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 05:36:25 -0000 On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Rick Thomas wrote: > Hi All, > > I=E2=80=99ve got a machine with a really bad clock. When I run NTP on it= , the > freq goes straight to 500.0 (over a period of a few days) and stays there= , > while the offset grows and grows. > > I recently switched this machine from Debian Linux to FreeBSD (wanting to > learn more about FreeBSD). Under Linux, I used adjtimex to modify the TI= CK > value and (once I had converged on the right value) NTP was able to > stabilize the clock. > > Is there an equivalent hack for FreeBSD? > You may wish to play around w/ sysctl kern.timecounter to find a setting that works for you. --=20 Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 08:42:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31F1077C for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from trent.utfs.org (trent.utfs.org [IPv6:2a03:3680:0:3::67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4731E80 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:42:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by trent.utfs.org (Postfix, from userid 8) id AB2B63DB43; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:41:52 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on trent.utfs.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=2.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, TO_NO_BRKTS_PCNT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from trent.utfs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by trent.utfs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1531F3DACD for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:41:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by trent.utfs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AC43DAC7 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:41:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:41:51 -0800 (PST) From: Christian Kujau To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD 10.1 crashing under load Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.19.4 (DEB 40 2013-11-18) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP (127.0.0.1 at Thu Feb 12 09:41:52 2015 +0100 (CET)) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 08:42:05 -0000 Hi, I have a Lenovo Ideapad S10 netbook running FreeBSD 10.1-p5 and ever since I switched from Linux Fedora to FreeBSD the system crashes regularly when the system is under a bit of load :-\ This netbook is operated in a headless mode, so I'm not using Wifi, Bluetooth or other fancy hardware features this netbook might have, only the system's disk and ethernet. I've put a few more details below, but what I wanted to ask is: are there any flags to set in FreeBSD so that it's more chatty when it crashes? Right now the system just reboots but leaves nothing in the system log as to _why_ it crashed. I've configured a crash dump device as per [0] but no crash dump is ever taken. I'm running with encrypted swap (via GELI), maybe crashdumping doesn't work with encrypted swap? I tried to set ddb_enable=YES in rc.conf but the standard kernel doesn't appear to have debugging enabled: # /etc/rc.d/ddb start /etc/rc.d/ddb: WARNING: failed precmd routine for ddb # sysctl debug.ddb.scripting.scripts sysctl: unknown oid 'debug.ddb.scripting.scripts': No such file or directory I don't have a serial console for this machine. Does anybody have any hints to to debug this thing? I haven't touched any boot parameters yet, anybody got a hint which knob to turn there? Thanks, Christian. [0] https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html $ kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 28 0xc0400000 13a367c kernel 2 1 0xc606c000 12000 geom_eli.ko 3 1 0xc607f000 22000 crypto.ko 4 1 0xc5f7b000 4000 fdescfs.ko 5 1 0xc628a000 8000 linprocfs.ko 6 2 0xc629e000 4a000 linux.ko 7 1 0xc6298000 3000 linsysfs.ko 8 1 0xc61b9000 2000 blank_saver.ko 9 1 0xc68c4000 5000 nullfs.ko The only "exotic" part here is the enabled Linux compatibility: I'm running a (headless) sysutils/linux-crashplan installation on this system but for some reason it's not running with a native FreeBSD JRE but needs java/linux-sun-jre17 to work. When running, this spawns some ~40 java processes that can be quite active on both CPU and network & disk I/O. It uses a lot of memory too and the machine does only have 1GB of physical memory (+1GB swap) but even if the application would use too much memory I'd expect the application to crash, not the whole system. The following is from "top -b" right before the machine crashed: =================================================================== 97 processes: 1 running, 96 sleeping Mem: 57M Active, 630M Inact, 281M Wired, 3104K Cache, 176M Buf, 6808K Free Swap: 1024M Total, 92M Used, 932M Free, 8% Inuse PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 91068 crashplan 1 52 19 1179M 69228K biord 0 0:21 36.18% java 24505 crashplan 1 40 19 1179M 69228K futex 1 11:13 0.78% java 24509 crashplan 1 40 19 1179M 69228K futex 0 0:10 0.49% java 40623 crashplan 1 39 19 1179M 69228K futex 1 179:40 0.00% java 5750 chrisk 1 20 0 15144K 2744K select 0 39:18 0.00% screen 5764 root 1 52 0 11048K 1276K wait 0 35:42 0.00% bash =================================================================== -- BOFH excuse #236: Fanout dropping voltage too much, try cutting some of those little traces From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 09:10:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C2C9C33 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f177.google.com (mail-ie0-f177.google.com [209.85.223.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E08A811E for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:10:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iecat20 with SMTP id at20so10332608iec.12 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 01:10:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Bz//Bp6PInuWLmCZk5ONhEgiWB/CARqJgmTJrDEYSQI=; b=ufDkQVYVLiIsMo9CnFRwhoh9nbStkDeOU2NkqzL0uTjCSFRaJGpLzC3Stdky9DJYcQ Sj5g78opkOqXDe5uS0OpIgXJATMsSzQkW9sREWkOgEsfo+QlIWA/iy7hzvcwaR8ML7K3 BcFqwwD+rPxY0JfN6PGP1KT2g9ABgLowTS0BFvw2LfLdK7/DzZHNOUGySXeTvd6pBhCe 4GTYu6gbqAtpeQ3mCql2832IcoJ2KjsY9BqueG790o6v9fENd3lRS65fuEfaxfl7QPH1 4Jo92hBU5YketEHvz+7PKBjiAweQTBydLgmdGn+hNd9kAYU88t96AS2wRm0F6BES73m9 R3+g== X-Received: by 10.42.188.133 with SMTP id da5mr7253084icb.37.1423732232932; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 01:10:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.119.34 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 01:10:12 -0800 (PST) From: Alexander Lunev Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:10:12 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: booting two freebsd slices from syslinux (boots always the first freebsd slice) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:10:34 -0000 Hello everyone! I'm trying to make bootable USB flash for servers install and recovery. To make it one USB for all my needs, i've come to this partitioning scheme: % gpart show da0 => 63 15734721 da0 MBR (7.5G) 63 8241282 1 fat32 [active] (3.9G) 8241345 3071943 2 freebsd (1.5G) 11313288 3071943 3 freebsd (1.5G) 14385231 1349523 4 freebsd (659M) 15734754 30 - free - (15K) % ls -l /dev/da da0% da0s1% da0s2% da0s2a% da0s3% da0s3a% da0s4% da0s4a% First partition is fat32 with HP SPP on it, which is booting by syslinux loader. Second is for FreeBSD 10.1-R 32bit system (root mounting from /dev/ufs/fbsd32). Third is for FreeBSD 10.1-R 64bit system (root mounting from /dev/ufs/fbsd64). Fourth is common to both FreeBSD systems /root folder. To make 2nd and 3rd partitions bootable i've make them with 'bsdlabel -B -w /dev/da0s2' and 'bsdlabel -B -w /dev/da0s3'. Here comes syslinux.cfg: label fbsd32 MENU LABEL FreeBSD 32bit KERNEL chain.c32 APPEND boot 2 label fbsd64 MENU LABEL FreeBSD 64bit KERNEL chain.c32 APPEND boot 3 label fbsd4 MENU LABEL FreeBSD 4part KERNEL chain.c32 APPEND boot 4 While booting if i choose label for "fbsd32" label, it boots 32bit system from da0s2. And when i choose "fbsd64" label it also boots 32bit system! I've make "fbsd4" label for testing purposes, it tries to boot from da0s4 slice and it's not booting since there are no boot code in it. Why does it boot from da0s2 system when i choose fbsd64 label? How can i debug booting process? -- your sweet isn't ready yet From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 17:46:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B58ADEC for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:46:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x22f.google.com (mail-lb0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F240A285 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:46:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f175.google.com with SMTP id n10so11005495lbv.6 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:46:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=CK571RnksEKIjopb1J5/rqwaI2Ba8DfkYy8QKE3R/SM=; b=GcPxgSV/i151Ox0/AP8O4zDQPxk0iGB0QoJIo29NrD++zVwdCDyJ2pEpjuTAlu1LpE Nz7mwHOv8hRlm1cKdg4ZiuH5gp+cUNoVLKWgDVKUqwbiSRPOqusVMFjbkqAm+IOKg9VK MaVbZBnu2lRa3Nc3NzUXSrmQdW8qlESH8xZzKoRqvXhsI/q7BhBlWuYTjyH1nBRqMtFp iyZqejuPDj/+ssnkGxL19c0wT43p7VZHOexyJ9b2ViBsNrgSiJtMTmTg0c8oGisfWFMv 0MRWhiLAs4VUtFV4e5VZzqiapNFR9DGWPoqX7UAXs5eWE51WfgWz6Q8ScjmEbZwUfFpc TDtw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.132.67 with SMTP id os3mr4465691lbb.90.1423763209938; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:46:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.208.41 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 09:46:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:46:49 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Automatic Installation From: Felipe Agnelli Barbosa To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:46:52 -0000 Hi guys, I'm finding a way to automate the installation from the FreeBSD server, with PXE. I saw some examples like with PXE/TFTP, dhcp, nfs and sysinstall, another examples with Cobbler(but until version 9.0[0]). So, what i would to know is your experience about it and what you guys think the best way to automate the process of installation from FreeBSD. Maybe I will join the Puppet or Chef in that process. [0] http://www.cobblerd.org/manuals/2.4.0/1/2_-_Distribution_Support.html Thanks in advance. Regards, Felipe From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 20:36:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40ADFCD5; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [192.94.73.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ma.sdf.org", Issuer "ma.sdf.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E46D893; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:36:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ma.sdf.org (IDENT:U2FsdGVkX19BKXACL3cLNkYhpa0JGf2gThYHmEv/qlQ@ma.sdf.org [192.94.73.31]) by sdf.org (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id t1CKPZBB022068; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:25:35 GMT MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:25:35 -0600 From: cpet To: Felipe Agnelli Barbosa Subject: Re: Automatic Installation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <57788523315836c58d38fef432752ea6@sdf.org> X-Sender: cpet@sdf.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 20:36:12 -0000 On 2015-02-12 11:46, Felipe Agnelli Barbosa wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm finding a way to automate the installation from the FreeBSD server, > with PXE. > I saw some examples like with PXE/TFTP, dhcp, nfs and sysinstall, > another > examples with Cobbler(but until version 9.0[0]). > > So, what i would to know is your experience about it and what you guys > think the best way to automate the process of installation from > FreeBSD. > Maybe I will join the Puppet or Chef in that process. > > [0] > http://www.cobblerd.org/manuals/2.4.0/1/2_-_Distribution_Support.html > > > Thanks in advance. > > Regards, > Felipe > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" There is no scripting language for bsdinstall as it in itself is a shell script. So just modify to suite your needs. As I can't find any info regarding this. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 12 23:06:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9BBF642 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:06:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74964AF5 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ierx19 with SMTP id x19so15763795ier.3 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:05:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=P6yNQTu9U+fePDQz3qfYDl5CgQE3NRDnMtP0myOfsPk=; b=kPQZTbccJ7lxxg2U9Ttw7g+lkH3cUlvSkaPI7OohDdq6KokzDSfBPHqDQqzpTsLzIO +1Nd31nrsI+Fmy0qT15AHt5YIEIuHn37U/9SxsJTBIwrvkLwlqMk7tZYMvIJaI6Z7XqO 1KvDz/Nmb8aO+NhxMoLDzOiSvfOeN0qvyhfOCWhsjERwMofbXFnp7KsjY3fP7EmXaMu4 fKyv3LkLzPooZzUGA/kVnUgWGI2G+TRHBYbQUiLkjdxV8Smn1PNpQr25HRH9N8NMZQwE vDXl4b2o9N3oNuWGhPHlGbdpgq7tCYaqiCX6U9KstLm4a05WwbdE51v+YyjbW7i7A7Wi yHCw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.80.12 with SMTP id n12mr944451igx.29.1423782355635; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:05:55 -0800 (PST) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.225.82 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:05:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 18:05:55 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: xX7m5qL0QRDiRLPBR1Lawnwr_uc Message-ID: Subject: Re: Automatic Installation From: Rick Miller To: Felipe Agnelli Barbosa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 23:06:02 -0000 On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Felipe Agnelli Barbosa wrote: > Hi guys, > > I'm finding a way to automate the installation from the FreeBSD server, > with PXE. > I saw some examples like with PXE/TFTP, dhcp, nfs and sysinstall, another > examples with Cobbler(but until version 9.0[0]). > > So, what i would to know is your experience about it and what you guys > think the best way to automate the process of installation from FreeBSD. > Maybe I will join the Puppet or Chef in that process. At a high level, there's no difference between a PXE auto install between 8.x and 10.x. DHCP, TFTP, and network accessible media are all that are needed. The differences are in the low level implementations and tools. A FreeBSD PXE Workflow diagram[1] (see references) illustrates the overall flow. The diagram specifically refers to an 8.x implementation, but also applies to 10.x just with different tools. I've implemented this with, both, FreeBSD 8.x and 10.x, but skipped 9.x for various reasons. My blog[2] has a number of posts[3] related to auto installing FreeBSD that are written specifically for 8.x, but some of the content is still relevant for 10.x. Time has been the biggest reason nothing has been posted about my experiences with 10.x. Cobbler was the platform used and, IIRC, the only real change necessary for 10.x was to update the distro signatures. The patch was not submitted back due to time pressure and the implementation was sub-optimal. Time pressure has also prevented retrofitting. 8.x was implemented using a customized bootonly ISO to fire up an automated sysinstall, but 10.x introduced bsdinstall and a bug[4] that prevented the bootonly ISO from working. So, the 10.x implementation used a customized mfsBSD[5] image implementing automated bsdinstall. The installerconfig implemented here is custom and written in such a manner that it bypasses bsdinstall's main functions, but this is not required. It was implemented this way to leverage features of Cobbler that enabled more dynamic control of installations via Cobbler. The bsdinstall man page[6] covers scripting an install. Cobbler provides management of DHCP and hosts the iPXE, mfsBSD, and installation media. iPXE is transferred via TFTP and retrieves mfsBSD over HTTP which, in turn, runs bsdinstall and installs a binary distribution fetched via HTTP from Cobbler. The DHCP server responds with a filename for the client to download. [1] http://hostileadmin.com/images/FreeBSD_PXE_Install_Workflow.gif [2] http://blog.hostileadmin.com/ [3] http://blog.hostileadmin.com/?s=cobbler [4] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190939 [5] http://mfsbsd.vx.sk [6] https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=bsdinstall HTH -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 00:07:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 844AC57E for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cloud68.cbsend.com (cloud68.cbsend.com [173.242.20.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FE46153 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:07:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=smtp_dkim; d=mta-server54.com; h=Message-ID:Reply-To:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Sender; i=bounce@mta-server54.com; bh=0woSGLXdRl8m2Dvvy6LF61NAH28=; b=gwWnwQcr56N1sTbaB4MEmaeibHuZa5Sb8WKjRsDQjxuRFGpVbQEx6d+nOWaeGt/1oN3zVjXNVxrZ CPZ8v47mqGOirfijQy4mFq3gDCykpMxvu6ScUe/UeKuJ/LXMIoq+wVAA6Ka2weuS22H/bSQf888S SD11i40JJ6p1txBBsKE= Received: by cloud68.cbsend.com id hrl0801mar8p for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 19:01:16 -0500 (envelope-from ) Message-ID: <05e2140d67639ef988cc14523e03f135@gtevent.org.uk> Reply-To: "Sustainable Communities 2015 Conference" From: "Sustainable Communities 2015 Conference" To: Subject: Ofgem Confirmed to Speak Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 19:01:03 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Thread-Index: nknjjtkjkpkmkikqkjjtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkkklkmkj Content-Language: en-us Sender: "Sustainable Communities 2015 Conference" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:07:26 -0000 Rhys Yates, Marketing Executive Tel: + 44 (0) 161 713 3878 =20 =09 =09 <= http://links.mta-server54.com/CBLT/nijtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkmkikqkjj= tkjkikhknkpkikhjtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkkklkmkjjtkhjtkmkmkkkqkiov= > =09 OVERVIEW <= http://links.mta-server54.com/CBLT/nijtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkmkikqkjj= tkjkikhknkpkikijtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkkklkmkjjtkhjtkmkmkkkqkiov= > WHO WILL ATTEND <= http://links.mta-server54.com/CBLT/nijtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkmkikqkjj= tkjkikhknkpkikjjtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkkklkmkjjtkhjtkmkmkkkqkiov= > WHY ATTEND = <= http://links.mta-server54.com/CBLT/nijtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkmkikqkjj= tkjkikhknkpkikkjtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkkklkmkjjtkhjtkmkmkkkqkiov= > WHERE AND WHEN <= http://links.mta-server54.com/CBLT/nijtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkmkikqkjj= tkjkikhknkpkikljtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkkklkmkjjtkhjtkmkmkkkqkiov= > SPEAKERS <= http://links.mta-server54.com/CBLT/nijtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkmkikqkjj= tkjkikhknkpkikmjtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkkklkmkjjtkhjtkmkmkkkqkiov= > = =20 <= http://links.mta-server54.com/CBLT/nijtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkmkikqkjj= tkjkikhknkpkiknjtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkkklkmkjjtkhjtkmkmkkkqkiov= > <= http://links.mta-server54.com/CBLT/nijtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkmkikqkjj= tkjkikhknkpkikojtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkkklkmkjjtkhjtkmkmkkkqkiov= > =20 Sustainable Communities 2015: Mitigate and Adapt The Mermaid Conference & Events Centre, London, 17th March 2015 =20 =09 Govtoday and Securing the Future are pleased to be hosting Sustainable = Communities 2015. The conference will be held on 17th March 2015 at the = Mermaid Conference Centre, London=2E REGISTER YOUR PLACE TODAY <= http://links.mta-server54.com/CBLT/nijtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkmkikqkjj= tkjkikhknkpkikpjtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkkklkmkjjtkhjtkmkmkkkqkiov= > Discounts for Group Bookings Available VIEW FULL DETAILS OF THE PROGRAMME <= http://links.mta-server54.com/CBLT/nijtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkmkikqkjj= tkjkikhknkpkikqjtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkkklkmkjjtkhjtkmkmkkkqkiov= > Rhys Yates Marketing Executive Tel: + 44 (0) 161 713 3878 This conference is a must attend event for housing and allied = professionals to learn how they can continue to move forward in making = domestic properties greener and more resilient to the effects of climate = change=2E =20 There a number of government policies, reports and schemes which will be = discussed at Sustainable Communities 2015. Crucially, the documents need = to be fully understood by local delivery bodies in order for full = compliance and, where applicable, full advantage to be garnered. =09 Confirmed Speakers INCLUDE: =09 Tim Pryce Head of Public Sector The Carbon Trust =20 =09 Paul Fisher Associate Director - Domestic RHI Ofgem =20 =09 Ute Collier Energy Lead Committee on Climate Change =20 =09 Tom Griffiths Deputy Director for Local Growth Analysis Department for Business, Innovation and Skills =20 =09 Jim Hodgson Healthy & Resilient Communities Lead Environment Agency =20 <= http://links.mta-server54.com/CBLT/nijtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkmkikqkjj= tkjkikhknkpkjkhjtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkkklkmkjjtkhjtkmkmkkkqkiov= > Forward this email <= http://links.mta-server54.com/CBLT/nijtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkmkikqkjj= tkjkikhknkpkjkijtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkkklkmkjjtkhjtkmkmkkkqkiov= > Email correspondence from: Govtoday, White Tower, MediaCity UK, Salford, United Kingdom, M50 2NT=2E UseUnsubscribe < = http://links.mta-server54.com/CBUT/nijtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkmkikqkjj= tlwjtkiknkmknkmkhkikmjtkjkpkkklkmkjjtkhjtkmkmkkkqkiov= >for removal=2E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 11:02:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 358AD5B3 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from d2ux.org (static.140.151.9.5.clients.your-server.de [5.9.151.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C73E46 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from d2ux.org (unknown [10.0.0.4]) by d2ux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC8641FE109 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:53:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from d2ux.org ([10.0.0.4]) by d2ux.org (d2ux.org [10.0.0.4]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ung5eJcLFaes for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:53:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.d2ux.org (unknown [10.0.0.7]) by d2ux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533441FD72D for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:53:09 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:53:09 +0100 From: Matthias Petermann To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Comodo root certificate missing - what to =?UTF-8?Q?do=3F?= Message-ID: X-Sender: matthias@petermann-it.de User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.5 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:02:44 -0000 Hello, I try to update a dynamic DNS entry at EuroDNS using ddclient(EuroDynDNS). Ddclient is configured so that it accesses https://update.eurodyndns.org. When I open this URL in Firefox, the certificate is accepted. The situation is different with ddclient or the openssl client. Both clients complain about the lack of local publisher certificate (see below). The following findings from various forums I've checked: * I use OpenSSL in base * Ca_root_nss-3.17.4_1 from the ports installed * Link from /etc/ssl/cert.pem exixtiert on /usr/local/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt (manually created) I have also tried the Comodo SSL certificates from https://support.comodo.com/index.php?/Default/Knowledgebase/Article/View/979/108/domain-validation-sha-2 attach it to /etc/ssl/cert.pem. None of this has brought an improvement. Where could the problem be? Thanks in advance and best regards, Matthias root@bsdberry:/usr/local/share/certs # openssl s_client -CAfile /etc/ssl/cert.pem -connect update.eurodyndns.org:443 CONNECTED(00000003) depth=0 OU = Domain Control Validated, OU = COMODO SSL, CN = update.eurodyndns.org verify error:num=20:unable to get local issuer certificate verify return:1 depth=0 OU = Domain Control Validated, OU = COMODO SSL, CN = update.eurodyndns.org verify error:num=27:certificate not trusted verify return:1 depth=0 OU = Domain Control Validated, OU = COMODO SSL, CN = update.eurodyndns.org verify error:num=21:unable to verify the first certificate verify return:1 --- Certificate chain 0 s:/OU=Domain Control Validated/OU=COMODO SSL/CN=update.eurodyndns.org i:/C=GB/ST=Greater Manchester/L=Salford/O=COMODO CA Limited/CN=COMODO SSL CA --- Server certificate -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE----- MIIFCDCCA/CgAwIBAgIQWrYgr7Hn0XCbNU1k3bTIfjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADBw MQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3JlYXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVyMRAwDgYD VQQHEwdTYWxmb3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0EgTGltaXRlZDEWMBQGA1UE AxMNQ09NT0RPIFNTTCBDQTAeFw0xNDA4MjIwMDAwMDBaFw0xNTA4MjkyMzU5NTla MFgxITAfBgNVBAsTGERvbWFpbiBDb250cm9sIFZhbGlkYXRlZDETMBEGA1UECxMK Q09NT0RPIFNTTDEeMBwGA1UEAxMVdXBkYXRlLmV1cm9keW5kbnMub3JnMIIBIjAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAvpdpoTcpiA69SRoQHgpTgpnZ8hGQ SG/ssUx7hYdpYv8zNiaLSxJoBNRzn2zKI/2783SHctFaX8HpjY1iEe1mCWV+XCNV H+YM6wSo6QJ36VUwv/JmaMswPpwYJR+huUtFt2WSIlr/kknDvQ10N4NpqbaF+ryk lXUm/L4kuf/3hJ4wehxLf/KTGtng1aISBk4MrlVI0R7vFvY9zfthTR97AQ24yggz OHZnXPk0VcdTHPh8UPl1zvd2hKddmfXXxrkiVhxukgk+/o3i2DWVO3dD8ssS7c+i tubFIXxnIZoOql+Y7koVwm1E4KCzrcpL0WEar5R5Pry01KDESkyickQiQwIDAQAB o4IBtDCCAbAwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUG2u9H4pJGJRUN1W0IBftN7l3GH0wHQYDVR0O BBYEFPVfl0OTHa0e4bVZ08XUnEh+R8iVMA4GA1UdDwEB/wQEAwIFoDAMBgNVHRMB Af8EAjAAMB0GA1UdJQQWMBQGCCsGAQUFBwMBBggrBgEFBQcDAjBPBgNVHSAESDBG MDoGCysGAQQBsjEBAgIHMCswKQYIKwYBBQUHAgEWHWh0dHBzOi8vc2VjdXJlLmNv bW9kby5jb20vQ1BTMAgGBmeBDAECATA4BgNVHR8EMTAvMC2gK6AphidodHRwOi8v Y3JsLmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbS9DT01PRE9TU0xDQS5jcmwwaQYIKwYBBQUHAQEEXTBb MDMGCCsGAQUFBzAChidodHRwOi8vY3J0LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbS9DT01PRE9TU0xD QS5jcnQwJAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbTA7BgNV HREENDAyghV1cGRhdGUuZXVyb2R5bmRucy5vcmeCGXd3dy51cGRhdGUuZXVyb2R5 bmRucy5vcmcwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEFBQADggEBAJlb7hOlIhfdQQP7EGo3lpwH7dYm gVPL78bLN+Xe+TIuCvq8bewv9Tv7FuwLGOwVcZQ0mfadsE9mY2aixMhwCwmUhtUx tF0ebRg616WF3p27rTksdLyvA9R+GUmwL4CawCOvyWSj5KwUS6gGuVgt+XCGiITQ dUfCYIBs2w9bwBRNbRGIhlWrdJVnzIsxiGpLZBXXDe0WPGXEmOJcRZCNEU1ZdIPj E6j+0R0z5JZHyMIsm1vuBOlohiTR/Em/kyT8N1boH0mGSa9oXlP32ip7p5KGSSht FKheeoE4rTAn4SWvxdvvV2P5M+uDWOa2RSTMoYmNzvjVqfvMw15I1QByDTs= -----END CERTIFICATE----- subject=/OU=Domain Control Validated/OU=COMODO SSL/CN=update.eurodyndns.org issuer=/C=GB/ST=Greater Manchester/L=Salford/O=COMODO CA Limited/CN=COMODO SSL CA --- No client certificate CA names sent --- SSL handshake has read 2009 bytes and written 521 bytes --- New, TLSv1/SSLv3, Cipher is DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA Server public key is 2048 bit Secure Renegotiation IS supported Compression: NONE Expansion: NONE SSL-Session: Protocol : TLSv1.2 Cipher : DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA Session-ID: E0996764ACCDE112BAE4307B4A15255C33917699528F12FF31A94AE445C9C83C Session-ID-ctx: Master-Key: 2AB611143A51C8D2967F630DA1DD4555BB065BDA7B12C12A6F78E70D7E9A8AE465DEBD3AD551F8E7BE6D4CB75F2597E1 Key-Arg : None PSK identity: None PSK identity hint: None SRP username: None Start Time: 1423827038 Timeout : 300 (sec) Verify return code: 21 (unable to verify the first certificate) --- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 13:10:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 572C81B9 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:10:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x22e.google.com (mail-lb0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B70A9D80 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:10:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f174.google.com with SMTP id z11so15397960lbi.5 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:10:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=K5y4PWkr+DC4d+L1qC0PsNoR7WoWuCdj7qO+BbPiN9g=; b=nZGMqVZm6t+mEmkZ445tIIb6VDwqZ81Z1YzSmZnclpAfT1jQ+eUX8fX2Nkk6EVsxft QWZdSSTjnEEO1O6AgIo5ThlJRYq2JOiea1bFq1mz7ZnQHMCCoB2YhECYjfU/Q1femsDx nfZ53UZrRKZL+jnyWPUWfF84qMbOClvIGX61P85J9ajKaypN4N8T88Re9xqH/S85B7zt OYJA4SlBegEE4jEm4UhBgDDGx9K9EL73E+Y+w/fQ9iIL6b24+OG6AOPQhR0ZWVYlVQ7c li56a+dWbrgoPoEHVSUNSxr7OYqGq3xZhx4HmKZACLxl87pnNQLJP/t7O65SP8qEIda/ pAhw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.43.18 with SMTP id s18mr8031921lal.26.1423833051390; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:10:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.208.41 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:10:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:10:51 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Automatic Installation From: Felipe Agnelli Barbosa To: Rick Miller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:10:54 -0000 Hi Rick and folks, This information is very useful for me, thanks for sharing. How do you use the network with the auto install system? I explain, for example, in your server, do you have more than one interface?, one for the "production network" and another to "auto installation system", or, in the same interface, two vlans with tagged port, or merely, put the auto install server in the same network? Which of those do you suggests to me? Thanks for your time, Regards, Felipe 2015-02-12 21:05 GMT-02:00 Rick Miller : > > > On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:46 PM, Felipe Agnelli Barbosa < > no.molas@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I'm finding a way to automate the installation from the FreeBSD server, >> with PXE. >> I saw some examples like with PXE/TFTP, dhcp, nfs and sysinstall, anoth= er >> examples with Cobbler(but until version 9.0[0]). >> >> So, what i would to know is your experience about it and what you guys >> think the best way to automate the process of installation from FreeBSD. >> Maybe I will join the Puppet or Chef in that process. > > > At a high level, there's no difference between a PXE auto install between > 8.x and 10.x. DHCP, TFTP, and network accessible media are all that are > needed. The differences are in the low level implementations and tools. = A > FreeBSD PXE Workflow diagram[1] (see references) illustrates the overall > flow. The diagram specifically refers to an 8.x implementation, but also > applies to 10.x just with different tools. > > I've implemented this with, both, FreeBSD 8.x and 10.x, but skipped 9.x > for various reasons. My blog[2] has a number of posts[3] related to auto > installing FreeBSD that are written specifically for 8.x, but some of the > content is still relevant for 10.x. Time has been the biggest reason > nothing has been posted about my experiences with 10.x. > > Cobbler was the platform used and, IIRC, the only real change necessary > for 10.x was to update the distro signatures. The patch was not submitte= d > back due to time pressure and the implementation was sub-optimal. Time > pressure has also prevented retrofitting. > > 8.x was implemented using a customized bootonly ISO to fire up an > automated sysinstall, but 10.x introduced bsdinstall and a bug[4] that > prevented the bootonly ISO from working. So, the 10.x implementation use= d > a customized mfsBSD[5] image implementing automated bsdinstall. The > installerconfig implemented here is custom and written in such a manner > that it bypasses bsdinstall's main functions, but this is not required. = It > was implemented this way to leverage features of Cobbler that enabled mor= e > dynamic control of installations via Cobbler. The bsdinstall man page[6] > covers scripting an install. > > Cobbler provides management of DHCP and hosts the iPXE, mfsBSD, and > installation media. iPXE is transferred via TFTP and retrieves mfsBSD ov= er > HTTP which, in turn, runs bsdinstall and installs a binary distribution > fetched via HTTP from Cobbler. The DHCP server responds with a filename > for the client to download. > > [1] http://hostileadmin.com/images/FreeBSD_PXE_Install_Workflow.gif > [2] http://blog.hostileadmin.com/ > [3] http://blog.hostileadmin.com/?s=3Dcobbler > [4] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D190939 > [5] http://mfsbsd.vx.sk > [6] https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=3Dbsdinstall > > HTH > > -- > Take care > Rick Miller > --=20 " A d=C3=BAvida =C3=A9 o principio da sabedoria " From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 13:21:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DFCB366 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x22b.google.com (mail-ig0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3886EE98 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f171.google.com with SMTP id h15so10439332igd.4 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:21:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=IPzuaJQeaeZPcFRgk/BlddMy9yOIyWliAXYV13j2WXw=; b=G7xTHH26cu34PJBeQCqTGHSNvPoTDYBJXUDa7iVarTermXGIwKOf6Wg2mghigFanCd TpmEGdRWaUlo3X0FjrswFxBRZZpW41Rk0ge8svOniaY3P3KngZ4waRqzBvWRQCqwvR87 YvY0ZGSCox/A6tqQUNljtdt1Skuky5rblA99daAemB4bfsSYAyPZDNcbguXwmsW1l9hU 1o5JuwCEFHpIzs/pPt9Tsl9AuV5qCoO1c7BxSl/WNzURnFMkN4jaXMs9mx3NnTs/D1qg bgS82VZRiPv1cXxXHFKBOlHWJj9urtuVHiyjWk0mQOvxSpk4q8kJ9ZVUyJajszKLPcD2 vNfw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.118.197 with SMTP id y5mr517353icq.9.1423833686599; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:21:26 -0800 (PST) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.225.82 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:21:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:21:26 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: giE9mXLjg_mvcFqGw6Fp894iw2I Message-ID: Subject: Re: Automatic Installation From: Rick Miller To: Felipe Agnelli Barbosa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:21:27 -0000 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Felipe Agnelli Barbosa wrote: > Hi Rick and folks, > > This information is very useful for me, thanks for sharing. > > How do you use the network with the auto install system? > I explain, for example, in your server, do you have more than one > interface?, one for the "production network" and another to "auto > installation system", or, in the same interface, two vlans with tagged > port, or merely, put the auto install server in the same network? > > Which of those do you suggests to me? > Any of these approaches are feasible and dependent largely on the environment available to you. That said, putting the install server on a service network is probably suboptimal. -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 13:36:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AC3A730 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f51.google.com (mail-la0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93467FBE for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by labhs14 with SMTP id hs14so15880926lab.1 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:36:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=xvTsg6MPs00xX13coyrfIHBVDutaizcvHIn7nNFPe9c=; b=t7KjcMbAtr4OwCxAM6Ipu++hDddsmu0CY6gV9YgEODsevWQsSRcYfs2qHyBWPzp/HA qYKm1AG5fcpUP8+hvayvpsnM512JUOqmFIDJW8wmp+EkyGYwbgoeiY/pVPJBgFq1OptU L6bY3CxirlbMUBo/onSNpADDcOspwWb+jxR1VXQd+/2MAjCAsOx7nNmDDfY7h97f4N2A aH69amy86b/hgZq/tT6Xq/tj0BEDWWXnQ0AzSy+NQ9E6ACZA3DUJJmxIL7VlI7vlzhN/ c/60zP6rlYmmIrqhs7+RLKRfl9AXDF8Yy1AeeIwkJi9Z3h1hclciwB9ewqzKBEEE6NL8 J9VA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.29.198 with SMTP id m6mr8343826lah.102.1423834571898; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:36:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.208.41 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 05:36:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:36:11 -0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Automatic Installation From: Felipe Agnelli Barbosa To: Rick Miller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:36:15 -0000 Ok Rick, I will studying this case to deploy. Thanks for your help. 2015-02-13 11:21 GMT-02:00 Rick Miller : > > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 8:10 AM, Felipe Agnelli Barbosa < > no.molas@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Rick and folks, >> >> This information is very useful for me, thanks for sharing. >> >> How do you use the network with the auto install system? >> I explain, for example, in your server, do you have more than one >> interface?, one for the "production network" and another to "auto >> installation system", or, in the same interface, two vlans with tagged >> port, or merely, put the auto install server in the same network? >> >> Which of those do you suggests to me? >> > > Any of these approaches are feasible and dependent largely on the > environment available to you. That said, putting the install server on a > service network is probably suboptimal. > > -- > Take care > Rick Miller > --=20 " A d=C3=BAvida =C3=A9 o principio da sabedoria " From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 14:13:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2421ABB for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:13:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ig0-x22a.google.com (mail-ig0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC7705F6 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:13:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f170.google.com with SMTP id l13so14820631iga.1 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 06:13:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=alIEOjvxwItCzOrp9rcOnvoBiK/FQAjW5JPdXgJu/hc=; b=JrB44vWHarJNblRE7/qu7B8Phnef+t4fkqE1KeWmDdUR2AXHQUmDPllGvbufFB+Eex 19SRIudZV/e2xF385USPDasSSWOFXBAcI8h7CNf4pSP7Q3MRYB+0/x/7bxTcTd0Ufv+x 6oK8d9d/AnxZW90Hc+kYhNh9W/xQ9Rge/ZjDgKVvRSwzktBEMC1/1rZHpE9J6WxM/Cik KNhnr6Xh+jdhgDOeBxocgCIs4/hdTjt7ZsBBSYmDFLawC5OB9p+AgIQq6EGV6eKThkOL CAdpkuoU2LXqCaROagdDEyPr5O0fo49P04UoxfEYb8YUVBef9tuUIEFCRbtvd6Ts0guA qRXQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.79.229 with SMTP id m5mr3793797igx.23.1423836803242; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 06:13:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.224.205 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 06:13:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:43:15 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: UPnP inspector and mediatomb on different Subnets. From: KK CHN To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 14:13:24 -0000 List, I installed mediatomb in my FreeBSD10 box with a recompiled the kernel with option MROUTING for multicast support. I referred this link for help ==> virtuallyhyper.com/2012/10/installing-mediatomb-on-freebsd-9-and-connecting-to-it-with-xbmc-from-a-fedora-17-os/ Mediatomb installed on this box up and running I can point my Desktop PC browse to the URL http://my_server_ip:49152 showing the mediatomb html page .. But, from my Desktop pc, I launched the UPnP inspector as in the tutorial, but it wont showing the mediatomb server in the dialog window of my Desktop. Here my Desktop PC is on 10.184.39.120 subnet and My FreeBSD mediatomb server is in 10.184.0.37 net work. I suspect the UPnP inspector failed to find the mediatomb inspector due to they are on different subnets. A work around, that I am not very familiar with is to install OpenVPN server in freebsd box and OpenVPN client in my Desktop PC. to make a Virtual network of the server and desktop pc on same subnet. ( http://mediatomb.cc/dokuwiki/faq:faq#my_upnp_player_can_not_see_mediatomb_what_is_wrong says to do the VPN tunneling) So I given a try.. I have done that and started OpenVPN in server box and client in Desktop PC I can see that from the ifconfig output of my server box the "tun0" interface is up and running tun0: flags=8051 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=80000 inet6 fe80::20e:cff:fee4:62c%tun0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 inet 10.8.0.1 --> 10.8.0.2 netmask 0xffffffff nd6 options=21 Opened by PID 62158 And in Desktop pc I started the client by# openvpn --script-security 2 --config /etc/openvpn/client.conf I can see tun0 up and running.. tun0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 inet addr:10.8.0.6 P-t-P:10.8.0.5 Mask:255.255.255.255 UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:10 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 RX bytes:3542 (3.4 KiB) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B) But still when I launch the UPnP inspector from the Desktop PC, it unable to show the mediatomb server in the client window.. Am I doing something wrong or Please shed some light to solve this issue. FreeBSD box compiled for options MROUTING uname -a ==> FreeBSD dms 10.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE #2: Thu Feb 12 19:27:31 IST 2015 root@dms:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386 Any more inputs required, Please specify the information required.. I can attach the traceback/paste to a pastebin and can give more inputs.. Please shed some light in this regard.. I am able to ping from the Desktop pc after the OpenVPN setting up root@[openvpn]#ping 10.184.0.37 (Original Remote IP of FBSD Box specified in the openvpn client.conf) PING 10.184.0.37 (10.184.0.37) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.184.0.37: icmp_req=1 ttl=63 time=0.223 ms 64 bytes from 10.184.0.37: icmp_req=2 ttl=63 time=0.256 ms Also ping the new tun0 iP to the server box also works root@kk[openvpn]#ping 10.8.0.1 PING 10.8.0.1 (10.8.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.8.0.1: icmp_req=1 ttl=64 time=0.778 ms 64 bytes from 10.8.0.1: icmp_req=2 ttl=64 time=0.720 ms ^Z This is the netstat -r output in client PC root@dhaneshkk[openvpn]#netstat -rn Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags MSS Window irtt Iface 0.0.0.0 10.184.39.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 10.8.0.1 10.8.0.5 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 tun0 10.8.0.5 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 tun0 10.184.39.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 netstat -r output of server box is Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 10.184.0.1 UGS 0 46021 em0 10.8.0.0/24 10.8.0.2 UGS 0 447 tun0 10.8.0.1 link#4 UHS 0 0 lo0 10.8.0.2 link#4 UH 0 8 tun0 10.184.0.0/24 link#1 U 0 3817 em0 10.184.0.37 link#1 UHS 0 0 lo0 127.0.0.1 link#3 UH 0 27650 lo0 Internet6: ...................... Do I have to add any manual root after the OpenVPN setup in both server and client PCs? If so how to add? what to add? Here is my openvpn.conf file of server box.. cat openvpn.conf ################################################# # Sample OpenVPN 2.0 config file for # # multi-client server. # # # # This file is for the server side # # of a many-clients <-> one-server # # OpenVPN configuration. # # # # OpenVPN also supports # # single-machine <-> single-machine # # configurations (See the Examples page # # on the web site for more info). # # # # This config should work on Windows # # or Linux/BSD systems. Remember on # # Windows to quote pathnames and use # # double backslashes, e.g.: # # "C:\\Program Files\\OpenVPN\\config\\foo.key" # # # # Comments are preceded with '#' or ';' # ################################################# # Which local IP address should OpenVPN # listen on? (optional) ;local a.b.c.d # Which TCP/UDP port should OpenVPN listen on? # If you want to run multiple OpenVPN instances # on the same machine, use a different port # number for each one. You will need to # open up this port on your firewall. port 1194 # TCP or UDP server? ;proto tcp proto udp # "dev tun" will create a routed IP tunnel, # "dev tap" will create an ethernet tunnel. # Use "dev tap0" if you are ethernet bridging # and have precreated a tap0 virtual interface # and bridged it with your ethernet interface. # If you want to control access policies # over the VPN, you must create firewall # rules for the the TUN/TAP interface. # On non-Windows systems, you can give # an explicit unit number, such as tun0. # On Windows, use "dev-node" for this. # On most systems, the VPN will not function # unless you partially or fully disable # the firewall for the TUN/TAP interface. ;dev tap dev tun # Windows needs the TAP-Win32 adapter name # from the Network Connections panel if you # have more than one. On XP SP2 or higher, # you may need to selectively disable the # Windows firewall for the TAP adapter. # Non-Windows systems usually don't need this. ;dev-node MyTap # SSL/TLS root certificate (ca), certificate # (cert), and private key (key). Each client # and the server must have their own cert and # key file. The server and all clients will # use the same ca file. # # See the "easy-rsa" directory for a series # of scripts for generating RSA certificates # and private keys. Remember to use # a unique Common Name for the server # and each of the client certificates. # # Any X509 key management system can be used. # OpenVPN can also use a PKCS #12 formatted key file # (see "pkcs12" directive in man page). ca ca.crt cert server.crt key server.key # This file should be kept secret # Diffie hellman parameters. # Generate your own with: # openssl dhparam -out dh2048.pem 2048 #dh dh2048.pem dh dh1024.pem # Network topology # Should be subnet (addressing via IP) # unless Windows clients v2.0.9 and lower have to # be supported (then net30, i.e. a /30 per client) # Defaults to net30 (not recommended) ;topology subnet # Configure server mode and supply a VPN subnet # for OpenVPN to draw client addresses from. # The server will take 10.8.0.1 for itself, # the rest will be made available to clients. # Each client will be able to reach the server # on 10.8.0.1. Comment this line out if you are # ethernet bridging. See the man page for more info. server 10.8.0.0 255.255.255.0 # Maintain a record of client <-> virtual IP address # associations in this file. If OpenVPN goes down or # is restarted, reconnecting clients can be assigned # the same virtual IP address from the pool that was # previously assigned. ifconfig-pool-persist ipp.txt # Configure server mode for ethernet bridging. # You must first use your OS's bridging capability # to bridge the TAP interface with the ethernet # NIC interface. Then you must manually set the # IP/netmask on the bridge interface, here we # assume 10.8.0.4/255.255.255.0. Finally we # must set aside an IP range in this subnet # (start=10.8.0.50 end=10.8.0.100) to allocate # to connecting clients. Leave this line commented # out unless you are ethernet bridging. ;server-bridge 10.8.0.4 255.255.255.0 10.8.0.50 10.8.0.100 # Configure server mode for ethernet bridging # using a DHCP-proxy, where clients talk # to the OpenVPN server-side DHCP server # to receive their IP address allocation # and DNS server addresses. You must first use # your OS's bridging capability to bridge the TAP # interface with the ethernet NIC interface. # Note: this mode only works on clients (such as # Windows), where the client-side TAP adapter is # bound to a DHCP client. ;server-bridge # Push routes to the client to allow it # to reach other private subnets behind # the server. Remember that these # private subnets will also need # to know to route the OpenVPN client # address pool (10.8.0.0/255.255.255.0) # back to the OpenVPN server. ;push "route 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0" ;push "route 192.168.20.0 255.255.255.0" # To assign specific IP addresses to specific # clients or if a connecting client has a private # subnet behind it that should also have VPN access, # use the subdirectory "ccd" for client-specific # configuration files (see man page for more info). # EXAMPLE: Suppose the client # having the certificate common name "Thelonious" # also has a small subnet behind his connecting # machine, such as 192.168.40.128/255.255.255.248. # First, uncomment out these lines: ;client-config-dir ccd ;route 192.168.40.128 255.255.255.248 # Then create a file ccd/Thelonious with this line: # iroute 192.168.40.128 255.255.255.248 # This will allow Thelonious' private subnet to # access the VPN. This example will only work # if you are routing, not bridging, i.e. you are # using "dev tun" and "server" directives. # EXAMPLE: Suppose you want to give # Thelonious a fixed VPN IP address of 10.9.0.1. # First uncomment out these lines: ;client-config-dir ccd ;route 10.9.0.0 255.255.255.252 # Then add this line to ccd/Thelonious: # ifconfig-push 10.9.0.1 10.9.0.2 # Suppose that you want to enable different # firewall access policies for different groups # of clients. There are two methods: # (1) Run multiple OpenVPN daemons, one for each # group, and firewall the TUN/TAP interface # for each group/daemon appropriately. # (2) (Advanced) Create a script to dynamically # modify the firewall in response to access # from different clients. See man # page for more info on learn-address script. ;learn-address ./script # If enabled, this directive will configure # all clients to redirect their default # network gateway through the VPN, causing # all IP traffic such as web browsing and # and DNS lookups to go through the VPN # (The OpenVPN server machine may need to NAT # or bridge the TUN/TAP interface to the internet # in order for this to work properly). ;push "redirect-gateway def1 bypass-dhcp" # Certain Windows-specific network settings # can be pushed to clients, such as DNS # or WINS server addresses. CAVEAT: # http://openvpn.net/faq.html#dhcpcaveats # The addresses below refer to the public # DNS servers provided by opendns.com. ;push "dhcp-option DNS 208.67.222.222" ;push "dhcp-option DNS 208.67.220.220" # Uncomment this directive to allow different # clients to be able to "see" each other. # By default, clients will only see the server. # To force clients to only see the server, you # will also need to appropriately firewall the # server's TUN/TAP interface. ;client-to-client # Uncomment this directive if multiple clients # might connect with the same certificate/key # files or common names. This is recommended # only for testing purposes. For production use, # each client should have its own certificate/key # pair. # # IF YOU HAVE NOT GENERATED INDIVIDUAL # CERTIFICATE/KEY PAIRS FOR EACH CLIENT, # EACH HAVING ITS OWN UNIQUE "COMMON NAME", # UNCOMMENT THIS LINE OUT. ;duplicate-cn # The keepalive directive causes ping-like # messages to be sent back and forth over # the link so that each side knows when # the other side has gone down. # Ping every 10 seconds, assume that remote # peer is down if no ping received during # a 120 second time period. keepalive 10 120 # For extra security beyond that provided # by SSL/TLS, create an "HMAC firewall" # to help block DoS attacks and UDP port flooding. # # Generate with: # openvpn --genkey --secret ta.key # # The server and each client must have # a copy of this key. # The second parameter should be '0' # on the server and '1' on the clients. ;tls-auth ta.key 0 # This file is secret # Select a cryptographic cipher. # This config item must be copied to # the client config file as well. ;cipher BF-CBC # Blowfish (default) ;cipher AES-128-CBC # AES ;cipher DES-EDE3-CBC # Triple-DES # Enable compression on the VPN link. # If you enable it here, you must also # enable it in the client config file. comp-lzo # The maximum number of concurrently connected # clients we want to allow. ;max-clients 100 # It's a good idea to reduce the OpenVPN # daemon's privileges after initialization. # # You can uncomment this out on # non-Windows systems. ;user nobody ;group nobody # The persist options will try to avoid # accessing certain resources on restart # that may no longer be accessible because # of the privilege downgrade. persist-key persist-tun # Output a short status file showing # current connections, truncated # and rewritten every minute. status openvpn-status.log # By default, log messages will go to the syslog (or # on Windows, if running as a service, they will go to # the "\Program Files\OpenVPN\log" directory). # Use log or log-append to override this default. # "log" will truncate the log file on OpenVPN startup, # while "log-append" will append to it. Use one # or the other (but not both). ;log openvpn.log ;log-append openvpn.log # Set the appropriate level of log # file verbosity. # # 0 is silent, except for fatal errors # 4 is reasonable for general usage # 5 and 6 can help to debug connection problems # 9 is extremely verbose verb 3 # Silence repeating messages. At most 20 # sequential messages of the same message # category will be output to the log. ;mute 20 ################################################# Her is my client.conf file of openvpn client box.. boss@kk[openvpn]$cat client.conf ############################################## # Sample client-side OpenVPN 2.0 config file # # for connecting to multi-client server. # # # # This configuration can be used by multiple # # clients, however each client should have # # its own cert and key files. # # # # On Windows, you might want to rename this # # file so it has a .ovpn extension # ############################################## # Specify that we are a client and that we # will be pulling certain config file directives # from the server. client # Use the same setting as you are using on # the server. # On most systems, the VPN will not function # unless you partially or fully disable # the firewall for the TUN/TAP interface. ;dev tap dev tun # Windows needs the TAP-Win32 adapter name # from the Network Connections panel # if you have more than one. On XP SP2, # you may need to disable the firewall # for the TAP adapter. ;dev-node MyTap # Are we connecting to a TCP or # UDP server? Use the same setting as # on the server. ;proto tcp proto udp # The hostname/IP and port of the server. # You can have multiple remote entries # to load balance between the servers. remote 10.184.0.37 1194 ;remote my-server-2 1194 # Choose a random host from the remote # list for load-balancing. Otherwise # try hosts in the order specified. ;remote-random # Keep trying indefinitely to resolve the # host name of the OpenVPN server. Very useful # on machines which are not permanently connected # to the internet such as laptops. resolv-retry infinite # Most clients don't need to bind to # a specific local port number. nobind # Downgrade privileges after initialization (non-Windows only) ;user nobody ;group nogroup user nobody group nogroup # Try to preserve some state across restarts. persist-key persist-tun # If you are connecting through an # HTTP proxy to reach the actual OpenVPN # server, put the proxy server/IP and # port number here. See the man page # if your proxy server requires # authentication. ;http-proxy-retry # retry on connection failures ;http-proxy [proxy server] [proxy port #] # Wireless networks often produce a lot # of duplicate packets. Set this flag # to silence duplicate packet warnings. ;mute-replay-warnings mute-replay-warnings # SSL/TLS parms. # See the server config file for more # description. It's best to use # a separate .crt/.key file pair # for each client. A single ca # file can be used for all clients. ca /etc/openvpn/certs/ca.crt cert /etc/openvpn/certs/kk.crt key /etc/openvpn/certs/kk.key # Verify server certificate by checking # that the certicate has the nsCertType # field set to "server". This is an # important precaution to protect against # a potential attack discussed here: # http://openvpn.net/howto.html#mitm # # To use this feature, you will need to generate # your server certificates with the nsCertType # field set to "server". The build-key-server # script in the easy-rsa folder will do this. ns-cert-type server # If a tls-auth key is used on the server # then every client must also have the key. ;tls-auth ta.key 1 # Select a cryptographic cipher. # If the cipher option is used on the server # then you must also specify it here. ;cipher x # Enable compression on the VPN link. # Don't enable this unless it is also # enabled in the server config file. comp-lzo # Set log file verbosity. verb 3 # Silence repeating messages ;mute 20 up /etc/openvpn/update-resolv-conf down /etc/openvpn/update-resolv-conf ################################################# ifconfig out put of Client box boss@kk[openvpn]$/sbin/ifconfig eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 74:46:a0:8e:43:6b inet addr:10.184.39.120 Bcast:10.184.39.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::7646:a0ff:fe8e:436b/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:633611 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:253003 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:345194263 (329.2 MiB) TX bytes:41049274 (39.1 MiB) Interrupt:20 Memory:f7d00000-f7d20000 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:65536 Metric:1 RX packets:92 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:92 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:7132 (6.9 KiB) TX bytes:7132 (6.9 KiB) tun0 Link encap:UNSPEC HWaddr 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 inet addr:10.8.0.6 P-t-P:10.8.0.5 Mask:255.255.255.255 UP POINTOPOINT RUNNING NOARP MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:17 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:100 RX bytes:5481 (5.3 KiB) TX bytes:168 (168.0 B) wlan0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 10:fe:ed:8c:19:47 inet6 addr: fe80::12fe:edff:fe8c:1947/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:38182 errors:0 dropped:1 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:2273 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:4403352 (4.1 MiB) TX bytes:446232 (435.7 KiB) ########################## IFCONFIG Output of Server box # ifconfig em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=209b ether 00:0e:0c:e4:06:2c inet 10.184.0.37 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.184.0.255 inet6 fe80::20e:cff:fee4:62c%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 nd6 options=29 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active em1: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=209b ether 00:0e:0c:e4:06:2d nd6 options=29 media: Ethernet autoselect status: no carrier lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=600003 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x3 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 nd6 options=21 tun0: flags=8051 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=80000 inet6 fe80::20e:cff:fee4:62c%tun0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 inet 10.8.0.1 --> 10.8.0.2 netmask 0xffffffff nd6 options=21 Opened by PID 62158 Also the mediatomb is listening on the new VPN IP of server box /etc/rc.conf mediatomb_enable="YES" mediatomb_flags="-i 10.8.0.1" // New openVPN ip address I can access in the browser of my Desktop PC to the URL of server http://10.8.0.1:49152 (OpenVPN assigned IP) mediatomb web html page showing.. http://10.184.0.37:49152 of the real IP also showing the mediatomb web page in browser. But launching the UPnP inspector from the client PC unable to detect the mediatomb server.. Definitely a N/W configuration issue.. Please help with your valuable suggestions and tips. Dhanesh. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 15:16:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E2576B9 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0998D04 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dutch.freebsd.net ([172.15.184.248]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MaIcY-1Y2ZG93daC-00Jr8B; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:15:58 +0100 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:15:39 -0500 From: Dutch Ingraham To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Aliased Fonts in Xombrero Message-ID: <20150213151539.GA1005@dutch.freebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:xKx7lCznwiq7egOqngtSpWEuinw08QiCWRhXwek1CdhCdz5gGS+ KK0RG1birr22KfQwJqU7YOzwIhQKfBn3oPMNPio6wAa3oDT4ot6aXXwpX5mafVy0UNh3wLn 9oOaGc9kv6485gPUqu9etJ5DYDznCt3QmXaV+D1/w7gCyLcz6jkQaeHCwJwjn2F2w9IxVFE iwYp7putUJV+KikjKR9RA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:16:06 -0000 Hello all: I'm having a problem with severe aliasing in Xombrero. This only happens on certain sites such as github and computerworld. Most other sites render fine. I have followed the handbook at section 6.6. and here are the fonts I have installed: /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts % ls -l total 200 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 66048 Nov 14 20:30 100dpi drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 66048 Nov 14 20:31 75dpi drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Jan 18 17:19 Liberation drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Nov 14 20:32 OTF drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Nov 14 20:32 TTF drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1536 Nov 14 20:32 Type1 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2560 Nov 14 20:31 cyrillic drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Nov 14 20:32 dejavu drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 1024 Nov 14 20:29 encodings drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 12800 Nov 14 20:31 misc drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 6144 Jan 7 19:03 terminus-font drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 3072 Jan 10 15:03 urwfonts drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Nov 14 20:24 util drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Jan 10 15:02 webfonts I also have each font in my font path in my xorg.conf.d/files.conf. Further, I have a fonts.dir for most: /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/fonts.dir /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/fonts.dir /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/Liberation/fonts.dir /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/OTF/fonts.dir /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/fonts.dir /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.dir /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/fonts.dir /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/dejavu/fonts.dir /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.dir /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/terminus-font/fonts.dir /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/urwfonts/fonts.dir /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/webfonts/fonts.dir Others seem to have the same problem[1] but I haven't seem a solution posted. Any pointers to a solution are appreciated. If you need further information, please let me know. Thanks. [1]https://github.com/conformal/xombrero/issues/72 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 15:59:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 736E7583 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:59:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from host202-129-static.10-188-b.business.telecomitalia.it (host202-129-static.10-188-b.business.telecomitalia.it [188.10.129.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E35D126 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:59:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.60] (MAURIZIO-PC [192.168.0.60]) by host202-129-static.10-188-b.business.telecomitalia.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D371694D; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:59:00 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <54DE1F44.3010802@cloverinformatica.it> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:59:00 +0100 From: Maurizio Vairani User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dutch Ingraham , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Aliased Fonts in Xombrero References: <20150213151539.GA1005@dutch.freebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20150213151539.GA1005@dutch.freebsd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:59:09 -0000 Il 13/02/2015 16:15, Dutch Ingraham ha scritto: > Hello all: > > I'm having a problem with severe aliasing in Xombrero. This only > happens on certain sites such as github and computerworld. Most other > sites render fine. > > I have followed the handbook at section 6.6. and here are the fonts I > have installed: > > /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts % ls -l > total 200 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 66048 Nov 14 20:30 100dpi > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 66048 Nov 14 20:31 75dpi > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Jan 18 17:19 Liberation > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Nov 14 20:32 OTF > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Nov 14 20:32 TTF > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1536 Nov 14 20:32 Type1 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 2560 Nov 14 20:31 cyrillic > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Nov 14 20:32 dejavu > drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 1024 Nov 14 20:29 encodings > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 12800 Nov 14 20:31 misc > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 6144 Jan 7 19:03 terminus-font > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 3072 Jan 10 15:03 urwfonts > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Nov 14 20:24 util > drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Jan 10 15:02 webfonts > > I also have each font in my font path in my xorg.conf.d/files.conf. > Further, I have a fonts.dir for most: > > /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/fonts.dir > /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/fonts.dir > /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/Liberation/fonts.dir > /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/OTF/fonts.dir > /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/fonts.dir > /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/fonts.dir > /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic/fonts.dir > /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/dejavu/fonts.dir > /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc/fonts.dir > /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/terminus-font/fonts.dir > /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/urwfonts/fonts.dir > /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/webfonts/fonts.dir > > Others seem to have the same problem[1] but I haven't seem a solution > posted. > > Any pointers to a solution are appreciated. If you need further information, > please let me know. Thanks. > > [1]https://github.com/conformal/xombrero/issues/72 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hi, in my laptop I have removed the two directories: /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi and Firefox looks like in Windows. If you need more fonts you can look at this excellent guide: https://cooltrainer.org/a-freebsd-desktop-howto/#install-fonts Maurizio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 16:04:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0744E71B for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7DC61F8 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:04:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dutch.freebsd.net ([172.15.184.248]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LgIio-1XqWkl2B6a-00niXn; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:04:39 +0100 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:04:36 -0500 From: Dutch Ingraham To: William Bulley Subject: Re: Aliased Fonts in Xombrero Message-ID: <20150213160436.GB1005@dutch.freebsd.net> References: <20150213153033.GS75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150213153033.GS75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:hhisThuVOx3et2UCuJ3hnf3hU5fElftiRsL7yFl7TG6xDbJaNLF m2nEB3uQCdkpaGshVFLNwCVMJ5mTGB9GwUyXuM2B+XtNY/uJ8jFfRUym8tb+oJF2nXb1gyM txNiAf1dRjnKJR5E/9g1NCF0jttNBmkYQGMtnEcK3QJOb9ZdelK3tFBDDQhxG309N3nYv8B Pb7iG7WcvmS0VnscTQVjw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:04:47 -0000 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 10:30:34AM -0500, William Bulley wrote: > According to Dutch Ingraham on Fri, 02/13/15 at 10:15: > > > > I'm having a problem with severe aliasing in Xombrero. This only > > happens on certain sites such as github and computerworld. Most other > > sites render fine. > > I am curious: what version of FreeBSD are you running? > > What version of xombrero are you using? > > How recently have you built either (if you build them)? > > Regards, > > web... > Sorry - here you go: FreeBSD dutch.freebsd.net 10.1-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p5 #0: Tue Jan 27 08:55:07 UTC 2015 Xombrero is version 1.6.3, built from ports Thu Jan 8 19:59:16 EST 2015 and was built with GTK2; the GTK3 version acts the same, though. The base system was installed around November 14, 2014 and last updated yesterday. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 16:19:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7EF625B for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 938513D6 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:19:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dutch.freebsd.net ([172.15.184.248]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MYfnI-1Y8brf3Tjm-00VMXO; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:19:46 +0100 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:19:42 -0500 From: Dutch Ingraham To: Maurizio Vairani Subject: Re: Aliased Fonts in Xombrero Message-ID: <20150213161942.GC1005@dutch.freebsd.net> References: <20150213151539.GA1005@dutch.freebsd.net> <54DE1F44.3010802@cloverinformatica.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54DE1F44.3010802@cloverinformatica.it> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:6wAc88Nx9Fnptzyz0S37YNU81cXKnrVukZVgmJ+lYdlcYo61Faj 2xTIW0cUG0NC/CCTexOX02SoQiO6GMA1wg1lQEIykmSg4cbIuzkN+dAGEDQ9QYpIiujibF2 VWHxefTzPkdSxpthQn+wTaMGNZ+V6lyXexOFe9s0R23o/+La/KjrZ9Oct9V3nDy3laP5bp3 s3CMvBg6wRFJtA4Vs/5uQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:19:50 -0000 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:59:00PM +0100, Maurizio Vairani wrote: > Il 13/02/2015 16:15, Dutch Ingraham ha scritto: > > Hello all: > > > > I'm having a problem with severe aliasing in Xombrero. This only > > happens on certain sites such as github and computerworld. Most other > > sites render fine. > > > > I have followed the handbook at section 6.6. and here are the fonts I > > have installed: > Hi, > in my laptop I have removed the two directories: > > /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi > /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi > > and Firefox looks like in Windows. > > If you need more fonts you can look at this excellent guide: > https://cooltrainer.org/a-freebsd-desktop-howto/#install-fonts > > Maurizio > > Thanks, Maurizio. Looks like others arrived at the same conclusion: http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/140333/blurred-75-100-dpi- xorg-font-packages-with-webkit I have the same issue with that poster, i.e., I'm not sure what cascading effect removing those legacy fonts may have. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 16:50:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 359D33E9 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:50:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f179.google.com (mail-wi0-f179.google.com [209.85.212.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C325E950 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f179.google.com with SMTP id hi2so13476671wib.0 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:50:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :user-agent; bh=sxbLvOzf502ezlJVpQzG5TAtqGMbUhasYZJ3QshnDow=; b=Z5NYnsaw0NL+jTZqk2Zby/XthT/8PvCAVF8nTpX2k71ikTL06tLDPfeOygUEueyaT8 pci6yYaJH9SmAyD6WAC+xATobpePHZLB3w1GMeyQqrH06WpJfssDk/bi5riCaHqi6AUG ONKdExMLJI2oH8VV/YbWucwYQ2GmjeEvy5a5K+N7O4oO9/tpNXrqIqUMAArFDoUiiUBy za+jpA0rdw7QYIisqmz6WgHmBgyG0tVmriJPwCGcy6xqTH/vw4xiwU8e5u2UuJ5iNQvX edqoO5kG9f521YRQHkAm7HniPIZ6FrsolumQ2P1ws4+6XsIWkoEpLSnDaVGj4UaJUqaS 0vUg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlBFDuAmNSg6kwpqC5wch/HjHIgj4lVeKG5svGdGN8nYnJaVbds3fyOLxzZCyuzKq26IOB6 X-Received: by 10.180.211.206 with SMTP id ne14mr17536544wic.79.1423846216253; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:50:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu. [141.213.135.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x6sm10773733wjf.24.2015.02.13.08.50.15 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:50:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 11:45:17 -0500 From: William Bulley To: Dutch Ingraham Subject: Re: Aliased Fonts in Xombrero Message-ID: <20150213164517.GV75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Dutch Ingraham , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:50:19 -0000 According to Dutch Ingraham on Fri, 02/13/15 at 11:04: > > FreeBSD dutch.freebsd.net 10.1-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p5 #0: > Tue Jan 27 08:55:07 UTC 2015 > > Xombrero is version 1.6.3, built from ports Thu Jan 8 19:59:16 EST > 2015 and was built with GTK2; the GTK3 version acts the same, though. > > The base system was installed around November 14, 2014 and last > updated yesterday. I am running 10.1-STABLE built/updated Jan 31 about two weeks ago. I was unable to build xombrero (1.6.3,2) and found there is an outstanding, unresolved bugzilla bug report dated August 2014: "www/xombrero -1.6.3 build failed settings.o" at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192779 I am curious how you were able to get xombrero to build... ;-) Regards, web... -- /"\ ASCII RIBBON / William Bulley \ / CAMPAIGN AGAINST / X HTML E-MAIL AND / E-MAIL: web@umich.edu / \ LISTSERV POSTINGS / 72 characters width template ----------------------------------------->| From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 17:06:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BAEAB1C for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:06:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58632C03 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:06:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dutch.freebsd.net ([172.15.184.248]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LwrCo-1XXtwL0G2y-016MYn; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:06:37 +0100 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:06:33 -0500 From: Dutch Ingraham To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Aliased Fonts in Xombrero Message-ID: <20150213170633.GD1005@dutch.freebsd.net> References: <20150213164517.GV75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150213164517.GV75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:DXGSbRT0FDv1c5ftKhbIs/h/Ci7+DUmi7k1YE/iU1xYzlpfQ01/ zuVNHkDtMKA8jsV4vc0DflTj4zvp+Vl7/caj8Fm9AUjCvGM6hZouRQoFStV7iAEVN0yYydB emVANqoOUChxJ0az5f5S3f/dfIpMXnk9s9yhuZpT5FfQpDrLbutvS6GeQJfLqjdLGbAiaww HFh1oiv2En1pGrc4WH5cQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Cc: web@umich.edu X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:06:40 -0000 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:45:17AM -0500, William Bulley wrote: > According to Dutch Ingraham on Fri, 02/13/15 at 11:04: > > > > FreeBSD dutch.freebsd.net 10.1-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p5 #0: > > Tue Jan 27 08:55:07 UTC 2015 > > > > Xombrero is version 1.6.3, built from ports Thu Jan 8 19:59:16 EST > > 2015 and was built with GTK2; the GTK3 version acts the same, though. > > > > The base system was installed around November 14, 2014 and last > > updated yesterday. > > I am running 10.1-STABLE built/updated Jan 31 about two weeks ago. > > I was unable to build xombrero (1.6.3,2) and found there is an > outstanding, unresolved bugzilla bug report dated August 2014: > > "www/xombrero -1.6.3 build failed settings.o" at > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192779 > > I am curious how you were able to get xombrero to build... ;-) > > Regards, > > web... I don't recall having a problem building it; in fact, I installed on a couple of different machines. The first one I compiled with GTK3, but that had a tendency to crash often (at least at first), so I built the next machine with GTK2. Other than visually, there doesn't seem to be much difference between the two in high-level operation (i.e., no config differences.) Both of these builds were done this year on 10.1-RELEASE versions of amd64. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 17:24:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45DCEF10 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f179.google.com (mail-we0-f179.google.com [74.125.82.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2A1FE26 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:24:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id u56so17901230wes.10 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:23:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :user-agent; bh=dFkFELx3AlR29rxNOrXbzfrE4AHFFAmAu6RgBeGM6AE=; b=c2O4I3Yni04PQgkl69xT315kyR177D42f8s135V4JNp90OTI/Nu/9+zXs/XtT6kSxD CPqNEJlx52LPqn7rJ6glcW884dEEnHJPrfyA0FatnDgQfoTie+O1iODmGSzOYr24+YgC 4hg50L609xcDUV9nS1r4gzkrnKsluaIveSnBYYRDg4YvXBxsC4GH/M4ViqsFUpXJELLJ vfx6+vguF8IU8457150XWTGcXyaxmN0B5xbc2sKIcg4slGw4TenCZu6mIpTUUVALR3Ip KBPVtrL4kSxlrnOBbc6ctc9KL0iQfaUVtrjT/Hg1A2X2RgfgUZbT9ohVH3Uv2cBscBGY 3xWQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkChbvpLtqbsZcC1wcdQa5L4/1rBssg6qMpXekjNQP06wmLtV88jpMe6xt5iBQxO+QrIRSK X-Received: by 10.194.176.33 with SMTP id cf1mr19563901wjc.19.1423848237888; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:23:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu. [141.213.135.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id z6sm7736553wix.20.2015.02.13.09.23.56 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:23:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:18:59 -0500 From: William Bulley To: Dutch Ingraham Subject: Re: Aliased Fonts in Xombrero Message-ID: <20150213171859.GZ75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Dutch Ingraham , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:24:06 -0000 According to Dutch Ingraham on Fri, 02/13/15 at 12:06: > > I don't recall having a problem building it; in fact, I installed on a > couple of different machines. The first one I compiled with GTK3, but > that had a tendency to crash often (at least at first), so I built the > next machine with GTK2. Other than visually, there doesn't seem to be > much difference between the two in high-level operation (i.e., no config > differences.) Both of these builds were done this year on 10.1-RELEASE > versions of amd64. Well, that is strange then. I'm also running amd64. Everything was built afresh about two weeks ago: system (buildworld, installworld), ports (svn update /usr/ports), and yet when I run this command: # portmaster -K -B -D www/xombrero the build fails and I get the same error signature as listed in that unresolved bugzilla report from August 2014. The xombrero-1.6.3,2 description on freebsd.org: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/www/xombrero/ lists most recent changes about two months ago, so I'm getting the same source as you must have. I'm very confused about all this... Regards, web... -- /"\ ASCII RIBBON / William Bulley \ / CAMPAIGN AGAINST / X HTML E-MAIL AND / E-MAIL: web@umich.edu / \ LISTSERV POSTINGS / 72 characters width template ----------------------------------------->| From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 17:31:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C597C1B2 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91BF3F3D for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:31:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dutch.freebsd.net ([172.15.184.248]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MTT8L-1YCBJd3KHH-00SM19; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:31:23 +0100 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:31:10 -0500 From: Dutch Ingraham To: Maurizio Vairani Subject: Re: Aliased Fonts in Xombrero Message-ID: <20150213173110.GA61672@dutch.freebsd.net> References: <20150213151539.GA1005@dutch.freebsd.net> <54DE1F44.3010802@cloverinformatica.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54DE1F44.3010802@cloverinformatica.it> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:4ydsQ54ZspeZpDTorvVQAQUlUPgFUnsWpz7AfV8u+oyeQU7xnrx bDfrdjqIHaAHbayrwJd8Cxkui2dU8VI8TEaF/7FBZ1z/ssLKiNlalu69huzdFJSArBgbXTb jk+6toA8+5wXJdW4Bxfz4vR+ODsU3IgscK5HZ98qYA1F2qBBsWTvbNWBY0W+nrA/VyB+1kM hjK1+H+618xKjbGsN6d+g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:31:27 -0000 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:59:00PM +0100, Maurizio Vairani wrote: > Il 13/02/2015 16:15, Dutch Ingraham ha scritto: > > Hello all: > > > > I'm having a problem with severe aliasing in Xombrero. This only > > happens on certain sites such as github and computerworld. Most other > > sites render fine. > > > > I have followed the handbook at section 6.6. and here are the fonts I > > have installed: > Hi, > in my laptop I have removed the two directories: > > /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi > /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi > > and Firefox looks like in Windows. > > If you need more fonts you can look at this excellent guide: > https://cooltrainer.org/a-freebsd-desktop-howto/#install-fonts > > Maurizio > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Maurizio: My curiosity got the better of me and I tried removing those two font families. Unfortunately, it had no effect upon the problem. Same aliasing on the same sites. I'm sure this is a configuration problem, and not a lack-of-fonts problem, as Xombrero renders cleanly without aliasing on other operating systems with the same fonts. I just need a hint as to where the knob is on Freebsd. Thanks for your suggestions. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 17:41:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38ADB742 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0444ADA for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dutch.freebsd.net ([172.15.184.248]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M70Cp-1XQUKZ3m0j-00wlZA for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:41:27 +0100 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:41:24 -0500 From: Dutch Ingraham To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Aliased Fonts in Xombrero Message-ID: <20150213174123.GB61672@dutch.freebsd.net> References: <20150213171859.GZ75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150213171859.GZ75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:6WLNfRRDa/VUpwHTMACU/ir9+V2neo649Gvx5c17xH9W/0RySgC +R6zD74f/e+UfzfjomejjAEctFcGtVMBLnnic3ASSLr4/YeL9xT5Dibk0GT3PRnE2895m4e Q0du1K3ejqAueFfFur7sugkvOHf+GpnlsfAuGFpsMW7xtdYmvTH/L3YdxQ5RoHwwY+fXNhw YA/T2eG5e823KfjNNpvsA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:41:28 -0000 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:18:59PM -0500, William Bulley wrote: > According to Dutch Ingraham on Fri, 02/13/15 at 12:06: > > > > I don't recall having a problem building it; in fact, I installed on a > > couple of different machines. The first one I compiled with GTK3, but > > that had a tendency to crash often (at least at first), so I built the > > next machine with GTK2. Other than visually, there doesn't seem to be > > much difference between the two in high-level operation (i.e., no config > > differences.) Both of these builds were done this year on 10.1-RELEASE > > versions of amd64. > > Well, that is strange then. I'm also running amd64. Everything was > built afresh about two weeks ago: system (buildworld, installworld), > ports (svn update /usr/ports), and yet when I run this command: > > # portmaster -K -B -D www/xombrero > > the build fails and I get the same error signature as listed in that > unresolved bugzilla report from August 2014. The xombrero-1.6.3,2 > description on freebsd.org: > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/www/xombrero/ > > lists most recent changes about two months ago, so I'm getting the > same source as you must have. I'm very confused about all this... > > Regards, > > web... Well, I don't use those parameters, but they shouldn't cause a build problem. Have you tried building with ? (I also presume you are using the standard base clang compiler?) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 17:53:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 601C1B01 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:53:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com [209.85.212.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECCA7255 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id r20so13933299wiv.2 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:53:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :user-agent; bh=tU0pq0h8aPgHeMiimE8C1xRng7xAndCjFhq0Wkje7pA=; b=C5aTVuHWad1ejr54gc2Rl7HR//k2zv3BS4mQ4wGyGJUZ0GfqBvdUv33eBZTVogJNGA SQyAzWL6MLPkMZAuvShahNCjxyEyRhxfmVv7iXkyn1yIaU2ZwfvVoExQarpkPzr4t6zc +seYPTDhJzs2Xa9oUoYnsIms4o32u5tOsn4HnMFtKbvcgmEwowsbdtRpDR/+LZ6bPgHd jv35ry0KBlB3JC6j5BushwLiwhTiutNwZHik+TexPF9I3Z8S6tbhyXGtWELx608NZrQY kNYfmYULlknjGCm1rUoAs4eYBcprQkU0R5iTWs5wgaBODTNC6Nps2zqaiXDEBkVYFNiI B6LA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmMMIr+jGibIvKTXiA8gaqUrApnTNjFiiSZc8I0fMky32FEqDiap8BWsS1ykeeUeJUuGIqQ X-Received: by 10.181.29.168 with SMTP id jx8mr18570822wid.8.1423850004965; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:53:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu. [141.213.135.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g8sm7856909wiy.6.2015.02.13.09.53.23 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:53:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:48:26 -0500 From: William Bulley To: Dutch Ingraham Subject: Re: Aliased Fonts in Xombrero Message-ID: <20150213174826.GB75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Dutch Ingraham , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 17:53:33 -0000 According to Dutch Ingraham on Fri, 02/13/15 at 12:41: > > Well, I don't use those parameters, but they shouldn't cause a build > problem. Have you tried building with ? (I also > presume you are using the standard base clang compiler?) I agree. Yes, I first tried MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes, but the same error occurred. Yes, I am using the base clang compiler. I like xombrero. I wish I could get past this and get it to build. :-( I tried to contact the port maintainer (zeising@FreeBSD.org) and the "antoine" person who made the most recent changes listed here: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/www/xombrero/ but I don't recall getting any response. Once I found the bugzilla report, I decided not to pile on by making another bugzilla report. Regards, web... -- /"\ ASCII RIBBON / William Bulley \ / CAMPAIGN AGAINST / X HTML E-MAIL AND / E-MAIL: web@umich.edu / \ LISTSERV POSTINGS / 72 characters width template ----------------------------------------->| From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 18:22:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4340B583 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2AF07A9 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t1DIMDAW052564; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:22:14 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <54DE40D5.3010002@qeng-ho.org> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:22:13 +0000 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dutch Ingraham , Maurizio Vairani Subject: Re: Aliased Fonts in Xombrero References: <20150213151539.GA1005@dutch.freebsd.net> <54DE1F44.3010802@cloverinformatica.it> <20150213161942.GC1005@dutch.freebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20150213161942.GC1005@dutch.freebsd.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:22:25 -0000 On 13/02/2015 16:19, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:59:00PM +0100, Maurizio Vairani wrote: >> Il 13/02/2015 16:15, Dutch Ingraham ha scritto: >>> Hello all: >>> >>> I'm having a problem with severe aliasing in Xombrero. This only >>> happens on certain sites such as github and computerworld. Most other >>> sites render fine. >>> >>> I have followed the handbook at section 6.6. and here are the fonts I >>> have installed: >> Hi, > >> in my laptop I have removed the two directories: >> >> /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi >> /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi >> >> and Firefox looks like in Windows. >> >> If you need more fonts you can look at this excellent guide: >> https://cooltrainer.org/a-freebsd-desktop-howto/#install-fonts >> >> Maurizio >> >> > Thanks, Maurizio. Looks like others arrived at the same conclusion: > http://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/140333/blurred-75-100-dpi- > xorg-font-packages-with-webkit > > I have the same issue with that poster, i.e., I'm not sure what > cascading effect removing those legacy fonts may have. What happens if you reorganise the FontPath directives in /etc/xorg.conf so the {100,75}dpi directories come last? I'm fairly certain the directories are searched in order. -- Those who do not learn from computing history are doomed to GOTO 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 18:27:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75ED7668 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:27:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4156A7EB for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:27:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dutch.freebsd.net ([172.15.184.248]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LlmQo-1XnHBZ2Vns-00ZReU for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:27:05 +0100 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:27:02 -0500 From: Dutch Ingraham To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Aliased Fonts in Xombrero Message-ID: <20150213182702.GC61672@dutch.freebsd.net> References: <20150213174826.GB75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150213174826.GB75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:zt1og5OikOwixbmUJjOoAIhM/gxmXLhUI++OFl+1g88ApMWp4Dz oMrGNh19aR+/j+1YnLAZTXOfpX8YcxiWxgxk5rCCDlGQ00bMCOjoyxHNCZk+VXQvoFAD9uj PHIwdfX9BkIqZ2cOJUL5/6i/8ew+0zd1QMivwcRA7Mp+us3n1wmclnW/qYgX5J/MzGSCFEw 74QuFhZJl2rx14iTaL3+A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:27:07 -0000 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:48:26PM -0500, William Bulley wrote: > According to Dutch Ingraham on Fri, 02/13/15 at 12:41: > > > > Well, I don't use those parameters, but they shouldn't cause a build > > problem. Have you tried building with ? (I also > > presume you are using the standard base clang compiler?) > > I agree. > > Yes, I first tried MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes, but the same error occurred. > > Yes, I am using the base clang compiler. > > I like xombrero. I wish I could get past this and get it to build. :-( > > I tried to contact the port maintainer (zeising@FreeBSD.org) and the > "antoine" person who made the most recent changes listed here: > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/www/xombrero/ > > but I don't recall getting any response. Once I found the bugzilla > report, I decided not to pile on by making another bugzilla report. > > Regards, > > web... Have you tried installing the package? Some recommend against mixing ports and packages, but I haven't run into problems doing that lately. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 18:34:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D389B4B for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A7DF8E6 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:34:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id kq14so20563145pab.3 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:34:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=DCL3Oa4tDPVK0wFX+sHkaNlroNQHydc/adbbg9FvMAY=; b=iZ1TtwFRthrjCdM1r9ZLlRvhqnJj5WegO1p+eqcWqUr0x7xgesXhLCtzF5T8TreVPN 4CP2yH9vORtfCICz9PDgP9Eeuv9Inx9Qj53Jx/n4RpPeG151+8TyVYs+lYfQSwAXNwl5 XwziqMzfTaY3Wtlckmd/pGTVGsIP0V1oGETgXPDjbnOdANgivC3j1nu0EqLP47haheUZ k9MlkiffQ5T9K/opnuXQWE5V7UfRl+RFv7h4z6SaEFhysihZ8kRJpR2qMLawhRu0cBqx 2n95Zz+IzM/t63DOCPN88F1gV0GuMvWmk3GhkvAdvXVv4TfDOON2Ziqf+IM6bDqA1al5 QWsg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.200.36 with SMTP id jp4mr17114903pbc.153.1423852469867; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:34:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.110.134 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 10:34:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150213174826.GB75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> References: <20150213174826.GB75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:34:29 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Aliased Fonts in Xombrero From: Adam Vande More To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:34:30 -0000 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 11:48 AM, William Bulley wrote: > > I agree. > > Yes, I first tried MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes, but the same error occurred. > > Yes, I am using the base clang compiler. > > I like xombrero. I wish I could get past this and get it to build. :-( > > I tried to contact the port maintainer (zeising@FreeBSD.org) and the > "antoine" person who made the most recent changes listed here: > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/www/xombrero/ > > but I don't recall getting any response. Once I found the bugzilla > report, I decided not to pile on by making another bugzilla report. > Maybe you could include useful build failure output in the bug since the stuff there now is meaningless. If that's all effort someone is willing to put into a bug report, might as well just save your time and not even submit it. -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 18:50:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D892C204 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2C51A40 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dutch.freebsd.net ([172.15.184.248]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LpL87-1Xi4Mg2hnR-00fEBi; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:50:51 +0100 Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 13:50:39 -0500 From: Dutch Ingraham To: Arthur Chance Subject: Re: Aliased Fonts in Xombrero Message-ID: <20150213185029.GA88355@dutch.freebsd.net> References: <20150213151539.GA1005@dutch.freebsd.net> <54DE1F44.3010802@cloverinformatica.it> <20150213161942.GC1005@dutch.freebsd.net> <54DE40D5.3010002@qeng-ho.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54DE40D5.3010002@qeng-ho.org> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:+MHOs3w/Yz5MiQYH20EVMshzFDjrjpWho9vvBkw21pHih5K6/9C JfQpnbGqFRLM4UffLvZfeQwtk/J7OLNzMKz5oZIuuGgIZSw/jAksrYwXj1GGsy7GNzrFAnL XJeG/8sq3s4jM59dBptJU7eHdkzp5ubSi3Y0n1Dl5MTiQI3CwwoSwsW4fNg6JJJzTzQJ8wt YD9r8ELIDIlZ+UGau2pmQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Cc: Maurizio Vairani , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:50:57 -0000 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 06:22:13PM +0000, Arthur Chance wrote: > On 13/02/2015 16:19, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:59:00PM +0100, Maurizio Vairani wrote: > >> Il 13/02/2015 16:15, Dutch Ingraham ha scritto: > > What happens if you reorganise the FontPath directives in /etc/xorg.conf > so the {100,75}dpi directories come last? I'm fairly certain the > directories are searched in order. > Arthur: No dice. Tried removing and moving down in the list - no change in problem. I'm pretty sure it is not a fonts per se issue, but a dependency-configuration issue, like gobject, pixman, renderproto, etc., I just have no idea which one(s). I'd like to hear from someone running Xombrero that does NOT have the issue and we could compare notes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 20:13:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 261D0885 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D31DB353 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:13:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YMMcB-0007x5-NA for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:13:27 +0100 Received: from pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.82.127]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:13:27 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:13:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: Clarifications on ACPI driver Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:13:20 -0500 Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: <54D25DF1.9030603@netfence.it> <54DA8C63.8000303@netfence.it> Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-82-127.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:13:38 -0000 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 02/04/15 21:50, Michael Powell wrote: >> Andrea Venturoli wrote: [snip] >> >> This is only so for the 32-bit i386 build. You will not see this in the >> 64- bit x86_64 build. > > Uh??? [snip] >> >> # grep -i acpi sys/i386/conf/GENERIC >> device acpi >> # grep -i acpi sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC >> device acpi >> options ACPI_DMAR >> # > > As you can see "device acpi" is present in both i386's and amd64's > GENERIC. I was wondering why on earth there was so much difference between what you were reporting and what I was seeing. Turns out you are indeed completely correct. I had originally cut-and-pasted the 'device acpi' into the Kate (GUI KDE editor) search feature "Find" and it returned nothing. Various permutations don't work either, and using 'acpi' as the search term is the only one that actually found these entries in the GENERIC .conf file(s). When using CLI commands such as above it works as expected. This is some form of regression in Kate - I have done things like this for such a long time I expected it to still "Just Work", only now it does not. Some kind of problem parsing the gap between the two words. Used to work; now it's broken. Sigh... -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 20:49:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2ED59581 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:49:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C66C88CE for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:49:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id x12so5347950wgg.6 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:49:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:user-mail-address:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=t15F1+CfbpvuW586h6Ckt8iSk6ivWShmUH0O+vDKVQM=; b=v7R/vVaUImvBKmlNH9FKByCJc+4cfuUaCeF7fcYwQMtUwdR5kjrhXsDq7ZJlcGVI3t 5Ex91B0A6Ela1P+TTCuYKAAUaq8k88hBiNLTU8goiXqz7yd3DeSNB8CCVZMntC/4Bz7B c1vt8u47Kb9CkhgQDIcJ7DKdehrLZ564CmU3RBRXI4K+lyZaV2R7Un1JGfhhig5umBEa KILn1XzqrDXlnwp93kKpSgFQiegc6CNAbZIc+ubZuWinBf5FBMB/SvK6tYYgD8XFta1P XndDZL3Q7eY3c3rCkewEKZ+6MPMAj9o85G2u6OT0L8tCorgiNK48ECBZd5xyWbfCMusM FDAw== X-Received: by 10.194.239.129 with SMTP id vs1mr21929126wjc.158.1423860559050; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:49:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from jedi.localdomain (adsl-dyn205.78-98-197.t-com.sk. [78.98.197.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fo9sm4359129wib.16.2015.02.13.12.49.18 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:49:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by jedi.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A1C1C5374; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:49:17 +0100 (CET) From: Ludovit Koren To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: HP Proliant MicroServer Gen8 User-Mail-Address: ludovit.koren@gmail.com Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:49:17 +0100 Message-ID: <86iof5bkqa.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:49:21 -0000 Hi, I am considering HP Proliant MicroServer Gen8 as a home NAS. Has anybody experience with the hardware especially with availabilty of the driver for HP Dynamic Smart Array B120i and 332i Ethernet Adapter which are in the server? I was not able to get any relevant information. Regards, lk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 20:49:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8AF4870 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f53.google.com (mail-la0-f53.google.com [209.85.215.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A35A8E7 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:49:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by labpv20 with SMTP id pv20so18627357lab.8 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:49:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AC5bFCUW7uFK4Mym2tgJejfy/FNnkLHAkiC18W4vyNI=; b=Yd8ESi2R1pO2W0lzOc/Ib9DByuf1bcyAxaBE+xZ1CaJUxgsRRG8+5vIuWpKPEGKyqq 8eZwnHFDz/mi/XyAzGRDd/p81k3VouMDcW7ycnnLju3ld4a4CATrbqY/OG5YRapj8aol KMPMUgdZ+ckhf0t011y+PC8N55kRf9J0b2ji4w9LeeBnCUOibM3hqC/SeGV5Ksj2uFzS AzIFBxTt/ppK8+DP0jTKbQyboQ0ufeJCqMJIimghHl4mbLosSJ1v596P0gfcuSrbGqKX McYZLvzYT5pM0TO2t7dczaNE6Xe7VhfBa1+VYYpga5dOb2T//njdGifeaNigg8bbZb/Z bfRw== X-Received: by 10.112.167.4 with SMTP id zk4mr4237110lbb.74.1423860595046; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:49:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from lazlar.no-ip.biz (213-64-218-92-no126.business.telia.com. [213.64.218.92]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x5sm1542918lax.44.2015.02.13.12.49.54 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:49:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54DE6371.4070609@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:49:53 +0100 From: Rolf Nielsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User questions Subject: Batch editing an SQLite db Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:49:57 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 I recently changed from one ROM to another on my Android phone. The old one and the new one use different mount points for the external SD card, and because of this the music playlists I've painstakingly created are utterly useless. The player refuses to even open them, because the files in them are non-existent. These are SQLite database files, and I've been able to open them with the SQLiteEditor app for Android, but I've not found an option to replace all occurances of a string with something else. I have eight playlists with some 500 songs each, so editing them manually would be tedious. Is there something in the ports tree that can do this? SQL isn't a language I speak fluently, so I'd need some pointers as well. Basically I need to substitute "sdcard1" for "extSdcard". TIA, Rolf Nielsen -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU3mNgAAoJEPJMW41Co4JgIF8P/RZBX6Pk5pb2TXjwQREAYjBT yXmj3GWO9XSBvVlhpgNjpshkYar/H9ZMNVQvOijLf0gt/cQZ1/SeHhSKV9fHhDNl O54PHLbJH3zwJZyS0srxJnkw7YWg+KIxWjNTE3x2vjbmdTT86UryNSMd4kdcYQN6 gP2aJFXC/wjEDLO71Zh2WYD6fsbi1vyxxBz4hXZlfvfQV9J2cGfXXd/HnsC41lia MoAJ+T6MRGwmrt3fYXbVRKixQAZMowfyW7mNQcr5uVjwFHhZcjWXRXfkp+hctyK9 VgKqKfalszjkcyYTxLo45CnFzCF8qhIP2f8zpPhvtHvA15sO9DhpnA6BSkBgOwgB wR8EG3sg9CPLMH0IdAvUVnhQGSuR2fJ9wH/H2QXk3/3LrauUjnpskiEWhDQ5/qZj 9sMIaNPcsuj2EdqSUV3gZlfUHQPakSDO1OuPBoacK2BKQjRaugO/RQpqokm2cXMa KLpBiNGO8kbavCP4uoZmPs3xjhrUSD/8iO0kOt4Pbby9ffFnPVQtHjAWaX1BQLHl BMC0VXEtYrDJjndYpp2tMUuP5iwi3v8QSMviUAeUPMJtW03dlF+rSqBzDKVxbtlw YoNWRICvCbrNFFJJSnxs5GOLk0cVZtJ+jC97Xq6ais3l2ev/HWPnfICYyILlGFK+ onlq3WP7JtF8/luE5FI3 =QZ8L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 20:54:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D1C2BC8 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:54:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-f170.google.com (mail-we0-f170.google.com [74.125.82.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 238FD9D7 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:54:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id q59so18946224wes.1 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:54:11 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :user-agent; bh=nUQw5pubmHG3+y4iUTlD4xh9lm4e5zR0N71ynuw5HSY=; b=QRZOUO8W/7eyhjdJPZTnHVKJ88+jBTfUfPnNuwLJ3+FEsb+DSXuLGI7oAT4KaO2zNA erujS+nnaNz5KW2apH2c7rBKys7DEP/lAzkDl/76jko0RR0pLoIe91dwK9IusqlQBGkf vC+G9wtY3Ww6xb1Dk3C862Hzrr6PWVZgzN8WNcoW3h/m9D6G+MBEJk5AX5Ro5fa5hl83 Qj0ilJSqt8Tz6O8JzVAUVNPtwskxGdqTsh9R+dVMS5VgpXFZS4NGL4m/DbJU6brn73u7 rtLT4nuLZTsBZvmFjUR9OOpTC4sqGS3apcihe6XA11rafDHl02/Z7GgTJ/FHIBZnpmPt UbMA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmLYiixpE21xUIv5aWiT0M+PAUu/8Axh76NG5J+7Eq9S1jNvpw6N3LRsGCpas6AtXi46P32 X-Received: by 10.194.190.111 with SMTP id gp15mr22904887wjc.132.1423860851047; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:54:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu. [141.213.135.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fs8sm4390130wib.8.2015.02.13.12.54.10 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:54:10 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:49:12 -0500 From: William Bulley To: Dutch Ingraham Subject: Re: Aliased Fonts in Xombrero Message-ID: <20150213204912.GH75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Dutch Ingraham , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:54:19 -0000 According to Dutch Ingraham on Fri, 02/13/15 at 13:27: > > Have you tried installing the package? Some recommend against mixing > ports and packages, but I haven't run into problems doing that lately. No. I always build from source. IMHO the bugzilla report should be addressed and retired, but I'm not able to spend the time searching. Since it works for you (building from source), there is little pressure to fix a problem that probably only affects a small number of users... :-) Regards, web... -- /"\ ASCII RIBBON / William Bulley \ / CAMPAIGN AGAINST / X HTML E-MAIL AND / E-MAIL: web@umich.edu / \ LISTSERV POSTINGS / 72 characters width template ----------------------------------------->| From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 13 20:57:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21183C7B for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB77A9F9 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:57:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id l15so14760036wiw.5 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:57:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :user-agent; bh=1px7sOk4DO7I89DDe9/k26lmNBONFRVUNqi7DTZ9HZQ=; b=bCbiEXZkaKi9Q2uonwEiA37PyMkhAMnqAn6e5vpeYlDdk72gi0tf2su3Q6IoqjVyDp yYsMnfUUJ+2E8TGSMNaWxNzpxG4KNz94YAd2cmjcAvIbKqyRgLPUsFLImDigCbTQzd5g A4awqTfLIl8iWxH/WwJmlC75nKcv/SjuGhmQCEplH8H8n1ukY1Bs5FFDKndWJk+gBJeR gxGqfLmuWC04wUkNoRere8/7EH4u/u5vh2TRf2NHVw8+/dKVYI0JzH75T7pFF181Y9Nk 3ft9Q5/uCExX9kzi8TP8KPQ08fE3+qmNueaLmhBbQhpDUNgZC+pKMK6DrcafkWcZyXTk mCUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkiDWMzD/olL7hMO3TaiQKHldb22Yjeygb0AyX7oRWKnVUYkntR4EatpdhTuiOtfbSwmKar X-Received: by 10.194.108.162 with SMTP id hl2mr22835437wjb.134.1423861065275; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:57:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu. [141.213.135.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id g10sm4401461wic.7.2015.02.13.12.57.44 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Feb 2015 12:57:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:52:47 -0500 From: William Bulley To: Adam Vande More Subject: Re: Aliased Fonts in Xombrero Message-ID: <20150213205247.GI75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Adam Vande More , FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 20:57:53 -0000 According to Adam Vande More on Fri, 02/13/15 at 13:34: > > Maybe you could include useful build failure output in the bug since the > stuff there now is meaningless. > > If that's all effort someone is willing to put into a bug report, might as > well just save your time and not even submit it. Are you serious? The bugzilla report shows exactly what I ran into. :-) What more (short of "piling on") should I provide? I'd be happy to include what I see when the error occurs, but I didn't want to just say "me too". I will add to the report, in great detail, if you don't think that would be impolite. Thanks. Regards, web... -- /"\ ASCII RIBBON / William Bulley \ / CAMPAIGN AGAINST / X HTML E-MAIL AND / E-MAIL: web@umich.edu / \ LISTSERV POSTINGS / 72 characters width template ----------------------------------------->| From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 00:25:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C950D755 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 00:25:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f172.google.com (mail-pd0-f172.google.com [209.85.192.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FCB7DB for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 00:25:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdbnh10 with SMTP id nh10so18351640pdb.11 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:25:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=bOa3ygbAYcXzCQm9Po5oQDhbO83gq1fRZ0vcV11opUQ=; b=C05wm7PBFFAEjuQJ3O32PJVccZQux+8WMfWCdP7GRBsOy29DcIj3Znf7i86O7f1Jy2 U4ABwnzWRTvpO4zTEJlBLuJ5jbHixeqRC34te2GRbijy322sgTjneSfkBhnQJN0rVLCV LUWh6C5c7aqKT3xjyPuosMcyU3limo4fHELhZTEVw1NCyh0kNFIdJovQIgejj6h+7Ule fBwxtyQhEmYPnH65sYNGFoHXbGxdlqGAMvVT6L/AfaC2kiZAk0rp3BU26gkbsu/XnEZx yEREGeymlEl22W8k2dZ8/KBWcLtBF86DpMOw8FElNnu36tF5T16iPt3zuekmjVKB4d3I 9vSQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.70.34.14 with SMTP id v14mr19485133pdi.132.1423873513667; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:25:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.110.134 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 16:25:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150213205247.GI75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> References: <20150213205247.GI75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:25:13 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Aliased Fonts in Xombrero From: Adam Vande More To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 00:25:20 -0000 On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 2:52 PM, William Bulley wrote: > The bugzilla report shows exactly what I ran into. :-) > That is not in dispute. > What more (short of "piling on") should I provide? > If you don't know what information to provide, the most comprehensive method is to run the build in a typescript w/ MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE set: cd /usr/ports/www/xombrero script xombrero.build make MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=1 And post/upload the relevant bits. Generally, +/- 20 lines from the FIRST error is what is needed to assess why the failure is occurring. Sometimes more info is needed like uname, freebsd-version, arch, port options, /etc/make.conf, other installed pkgs, how was make called, etc. Also, a "me too" isn't harmful especially if no one else has said it. A "me too" is probably also desired if some period of activity has passed eg *bump*. A bug report with all the sufficient information has a much better chance of being pursued than one where information needs to be teased out of the user. -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 01:40:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1700163E for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 01:40:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAF2B964 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 01:40:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-63-165.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.63.165]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1BE227629; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 02:33:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t1E1X5Z2003080; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 02:33:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 02:33:05 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Rolf Nielsen Subject: Re: Batch editing an SQLite db Message-Id: <20150214023305.fab9370d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <54DE6371.4070609@gmail.com> References: <54DE6371.4070609@gmail.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: User questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 01:40:36 -0000 On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:49:53 +0100, Rolf Nielsen wrote: > I recently changed from one ROM to another on my Android phone. The > old one and the new one use different mount points for the external SD > card, and because of this the music playlists I've painstakingly > created are utterly useless. The player refuses to even open them, > because the files in them are non-existent. These are SQLite database > files, and I've been able to open them with the SQLiteEditor app for > Android, but I've not found an option to replace all occurances of a > string with something else. I have eight playlists with some 500 songs > each, so editing them manually would be tedious. Is there something in > the ports tree that can do this? SQL isn't a language I speak > fluently, so I'd need some pointers as well. Basically I need to > substitute "sdcard1" for "extSdcard". Do you have r/w access to the database file and a SQLite installation you can use? Then you can use its replace() function with an UPDATE command: UPDATE SET = replace(, 'sdcard1', 'extSdcard') WHERE LIKE '%sdcard1%'; Here is the name of the table which contains the playlist entries, and is the "column name" under which playlist entriy paths are stored. "Sadly", I don't have to mess with SQL regularly anymore. So not tested. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 02:11:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACE4791C for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 02:11:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com (mail-la0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ACE3C05 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 02:11:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by labge10 with SMTP id ge10so19587282lab.12 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:11:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8wyWg+8e3WMjkeRyilA1mWHwi9PG/nxQyiXf5W6APsA=; b=eovjscrJkBzB0dsckSkokWzlNC33ONiIs32zwE2J/FMFRYI/0TCl/hF6eWmZZKAHUA 6dkJ+JKZyPoe50/Kpz/cc0DMs7iXZ5SMKkeonWOp1nyObZ4L4cqhwZqtVTY1rNwVe74m y4FUNE5vl38r4dQ+fg7jnHVNHVm6OOPne3scfI/k6VJeyFXHueqfZDWUHSullsufCjWM GJPP7rISfzygszVNHxG8lAKpk+jBafTqEMsPd9f0LbkAHxpsJ5+Cz4jr7n3VCVYPLRvA jaARIXuBwUWl/N1CT8JbTVkP6VdYHmUfzQ3kIsfk6m5BnF9fwGUc5fvEY2Ck0l7abvfU bC6Q== X-Received: by 10.112.126.98 with SMTP id mx2mr10918143lbb.84.1423879909055; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:11:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from lazlar.no-ip.biz (213-64-218-92-no126.business.telia.com. [213.64.218.92]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wq3sm1662816lbb.24.2015.02.13.18.11.48 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Feb 2015 18:11:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54DEAEE4.5090704@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 03:11:48 +0100 From: Rolf Nielsen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon Subject: Re: Batch editing an SQLite db References: <54DE6371.4070609@gmail.com> <20150214023305.fab9370d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20150214023305.fab9370d.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: User questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 02:11:51 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 2015-02-14 02:33, Polytropon wrote: > On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:49:53 +0100, Rolf Nielsen wrote: >> I recently changed from one ROM to another on my Android phone. >> The old one and the new one use different mount points for the >> external SD card, and because of this the music playlists I've >> painstakingly created are utterly useless. The player refuses to >> even open them, because the files in them are non-existent. These >> are SQLite database files, and I've been able to open them with >> the SQLiteEditor app for Android, but I've not found an option to >> replace all occurances of a string with something else. I have >> eight playlists with some 500 songs each, so editing them >> manually would be tedious. Is there something in the ports tree >> that can do this? SQL isn't a language I speak fluently, so I'd >> need some pointers as well. Basically I need to substitute >> "sdcard1" for "extSdcard". > > Do you have r/w access to the database file and a SQLite > installation you can use? Then you can use its replace() function > with an UPDATE command: > > UPDATE SET = replace(, 'sdcard1', > 'extSdcard') WHERE LIKE '%sdcard1%'; > > Here is the name of the table which contains the > playlist entries, and is the "column name" under which > playlist entriy paths are stored. > > "Sadly", I don't have to mess with SQL regularly anymore. So not > tested. :-) > > I have root access to my phone, so r/w access isn't going to be a problem. I also have SQLite installed (as a dependency of some other port(s)) on my home computer. I will try this during the weekend. If I'm not mistaken, you and I are in the same TZ, which means we're both up so late it's actually early... Suffice it to say, I'm not up for the task right now. I'll report back once I've tried it. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJU3q7XAAoJEPJMW41Co4JgsncP/3x+qxqvC2WxAJccvep51TFz gbMFIpej4aYkte1u9outePPP5QATmyEu8bpkxP1H37gcuqyPBw5eT2ZLoQmF8QER 8Ghxwh4mV2+wvyW3XmaxGxIC01wOcZfHmPRFfGv43laIjzMaV50EBmN4Wuy+HOPT k/AVgwAjMRFhqJV7sncwLgRkIHxQ9J6Hlw+sPscEMPYQHt+A07THCwoNgBQuC529 CLK/qCHi4KVnEy/NWS4ucGphCoIL4wjmdYhDQEipMRxJtby+GnIeE5P4YjJ8J/+F sgvLrzYNmFuwJ7Coi5ixLxtfBoVjKu1ym/9GjHWAUNfv+wkHgwAvMD4yA6gNaPWv dVkIrETawSgPX2RSzbz36vinMpPVULoR8AmRtb8tNR8OdRYXT2eZteQ7xUIpBQJC ET7QrFFDOvLi8ORlqWlJLjEjV4ziQoJEzq4T9f0CLmzez+1uK3qKC0vKIpHQ9nf2 D7iFHjMmtOIN72o+aytg2ZLU8twcTupbI4OBSdEXft5Nzx/gSu9IddiVs1E/Q7Bp ID0Etoy8ITwE8iiFWj6cmoUmeZx/rMjmtE5kbaauGVaeKl8r6srnrqcJlIXn3Pq5 43RC5PrlJi0SXALVT4DVOc0yZGDSyOP9kF89UyOMlZjhzAxN3jW7LNKHdR1FA4yE ewNYyOZjgwsgzJIGw08O =aRxG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 03:30:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44406189 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 03:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com (mail-wg0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEB673DA for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 03:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f49.google.com with SMTP id l18so20155148wgh.8 for ; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:30:17 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :user-agent; bh=MtrqrC7pCopasD0RPpYjCqNcap1XjEcSKt/OFF53/zM=; b=Rr6SjodL0JBvTpgqaps0UuMbNzPxfgydv8wfTi/QB97iKhkhz02X3g7fIretqO0Q7L jD8Huo5XkCAHoR7dmlYPUH1Ya1MOD6dgPY9JmfrCbPZxlwl0fuLikVdLJDDb0QYsEUfE VjqEsHLzXihXFfLAqCFdM611s9MUraZS2681xlrBYeOTt8kMzZniHZb34LRSnydpdz79 WXsAqMuRJl40d6lRqzIBtswqM4yrb3DmniAu0MpeXNQMwqsvbYx7UFaTxVBuyM42Qt/B v5IoQIOfILR2jQJaK750sJbRexTbgLS+5pOLue7Lq7vtQyomPpg7CFKjEeGUJo8VYBpr C6Sg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn3/Tc9XNT9CpftNrCDJA7yUgrdLyb1Z7t2dZ6Awq+jbvB08DKabAPo9KGyovMElZEM51Sn X-Received: by 10.194.240.164 with SMTP id wb4mr24779697wjc.66.1423884616948; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:30:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu. [141.213.135.249]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dm6sm9335920wib.22.2015.02.13.19.30.15 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Feb 2015 19:30:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 22:25:18 -0500 From: William Bulley To: Adam Vande More Subject: Re: Aliased Fonts in Xombrero Message-ID: <20150214032518.GL75183@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> Mail-Followup-To: Adam Vande More , FreeBSD Questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 03:30:19 -0000 According to Adam Vande More on Fri, 02/13/15 at 19:25: > > If you don't know what information to provide, the most comprehensive > method is to run the build in a typescript w/ MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE set: > > cd /usr/ports/www/xombrero > script xombrero.build make MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=1 > > And post/upload the relevant bits. > > Generally, +/- 20 lines from the FIRST error is what is needed to assess > why the failure is occurring. Sometimes more info is needed like uname, > freebsd-version, arch, port options, /etc/make.conf, other installed pkgs, > how was make called, etc. > > Also, a "me too" isn't harmful especially if no one else has said it. A > "me too" is probably also desired if some period of activity has passed eg > *bump*. > > A bug report with all the sufficient information has a much better chance > of being pursued than one where information needs to be teased out of the > user. I did a lot of that earlier this afternoon. If more is desired, I can easily provide. Since uname(1) gives most of that, I could add that here: FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0: Sat Jan 31 16:16:23 EST 2015 amd64 I'm not sure what is meant by "port options" since after "svn update"ing my ports tree, and "making" over 900 ports (without incident) using portmaster as I indicated earlier, I was left with only www/xombrero wanting... :-( unix% cat /etc/make.conf CFLAGS+= -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe COPTFLAGS+= -O -pipe DOC_LANG=en_US.ISO8859-1 WITH_MOZILLA=firefox WITH_GECKO=firefox OPTIONS_UNSET=CUPS OPTIONS_SET=LPR WITH_BDB_VER=5 MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER=10 TRACEROUTE_NO_IPSEC=TRUE OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=c6 OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=c6 WITH_PKGNG=yes Again, I didn't call make(1) explicitly as I have taken to using portmaster(8) for its value add. Thanks for all the help. I hope some of my info helps, too. Regards, web... -- /"\ ASCII RIBBON / William Bulley \ / CAMPAIGN AGAINST / X HTML E-MAIL AND / E-MAIL: web@umich.edu / \ LISTSERV POSTINGS / 72 characters width template ----------------------------------------->| From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 11:42:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E4E7B7C for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:42:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (pb-sasl1.int.icgroup.com [208.72.237.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6843D6DE for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F382D68C; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 06:42:26 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=sasl; bh= bizfBk3XheW2doZ8mQIKgIMv+qE=; b=cE2k3DJVkayT+ObYTJ/Y1Oe1bneqZfcQ oBNHxpiUdl3mVwdVkJ24kviZzPpa337ZQneJ0aGf86KEzHYPUtD/VO0EIulGk+0t Lbc3Sr9Dos5cP/ErTriLCIACSWRoI5pA2Dkh+BoE8kwjW1xxnc3ojm49K9JWNV/x MKrfBxmVvS4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= sasl; b=wywPocHUiMdky2pghJJvIYbdU2CMoU6Lox4fSvZT/KS6QuBHvY1YynNe bw7UZ62ydcfuCO9eJBJLVm9pVuMt8bvWZ1pxUL9xhhg+nW5dQMDCUS5txV3L/Scm LE2ileRvazjRGNCAUmxkvXBt9zWsxu+y9jNJ/kd+L96+QtQVBvI= Received: from pb-sasl1.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D5782D68B; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 06:42:26 -0500 (EST) Received: from almini.rcthomas.org (unknown [208.53.120.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BFA12D68A; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 06:42:25 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: How to adjust clock frequency in FreeBSD 10.1 ? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Rick Thomas In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 03:42:22 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Adam Vande More X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8C3905FC-B43E-11E4-8084-8FDD009B7A5A-02150157!pb-sasl1.pobox.com Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:42:34 -0000 On Feb 11, 2015, at 9:36 PM, Adam Vande More = wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:09 PM, Rick Thomas = wrote: >=20 >> Hi All, >>=20 >> I=92ve got a machine with a really bad clock. When I run NTP on it, = the >> freq goes straight to 500.0 (over a period of a few days) and stays = there, >> while the offset grows and grows. >>=20 >> I recently switched this machine from Debian Linux to FreeBSD = (wanting to >> learn more about FreeBSD). Under Linux, I used adjtimex to modify = the TICK >> value and (once I had converged on the right value) NTP was able to >> stabilize the clock. >>=20 >> Is there an equivalent hack for FreeBSD? >>=20 >=20 > You may wish to play around w/ >=20 > sysctl kern.timecounter >=20 > to find a setting that works for you. When I try to change the frequency with (e.g.) sysctl kern.timecounter.tc.timebase.frequency=3D36000000 I get sysctl: oid =91kern.timecounter.tc.timebase.frequency' is read only Is there some other way to set the frequency? Thanks! Rick= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 12:50:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 164C7A74 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:50:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com (mail-pd0-f179.google.com [209.85.192.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE3CDC9B for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pdbfp1 with SMTP id fp1so20789341pdb.5 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 04:50:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=mlmpgkjP5OzY7bwfRIGRfROUhGiDUZs6WRnOmHl1a8I=; b=FhZqhBMwnb5q+7aAMbGRfKzboMxMiDlGNjI2lJk7HaLa7dumraOrEYJ3+6wy6Ls5l/ dBzbXgJpNRA6EiljE9WbjITtVaGiDE9oOCRqeS/0Bscyaq1r1mWcyv/Z3G+veBp4TQaI Z5uzAllsmz8qw9mFDg4xPJU0O0HeaJlsnU8Mv7zd9SaNwN620DcRTLPY7q/M7n42fjOU 3Q1DW1fWaXzlRzBDNBNZbRCiOFkYhswLNRJQEpwy7HkNxze2lXT9GqPCxIjmdXhp9Y05 ENaAjXcifTgYVDZZdmkzi2noExNxmP3fX4f4uPehu+IapJ56VNfYXwttiXbpbMm+iwhg NclQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.69.36 with SMTP id b4mr16481535pbu.132.1423918214607; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 04:50:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.110.134 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 04:50:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 06:50:14 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to adjust clock frequency in FreeBSD 10.1 ? From: Adam Vande More To: Rick Thomas Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:50:21 -0000 On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Rick Thomas wrote: > When I try to change the frequency with (e.g.) > sysctl kern.timecounter.tc.timebase.frequency=3D36000000 > > I get > sysctl: oid =E2=80=98kern.timecounter.tc.timebase.frequency' is read = only > Yeah, pretty clear that sysctl isn't going to help you in any way in "man 4 timecounters" Is there some other way to set the frequency? > Sure, but I thought keeping accurate time was the goal? If so, sharing the output from the first command I gave you is a good start. --=20 Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 13:53:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0C614E7 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:53:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm31-vm4.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com (nm31-vm4.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com [212.82.97.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 429DD262 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:53:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.es; s=s2048; t=1423921992; bh=+rFEXE+/jrnwpwD4Chs/MGJBBeXgj9nJTUd9U+KnRRw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From:Subject; b=sy2SzKsAAxcJ9C/momv+zfJAve+Tc5quSpo4sunMQx67vG2ipb6kD7RvMMsdpOE1ouxZel72sd/ODB9BI8UiwjSqPokG3J1iMUX6HnxVtmZUNNaWciPVmD8Av5wtn/CVK4yyOYr6taBcIhVZIZSOcfpeRwKCdORtScMc1nM5ZmeA88CV4J9zRoCA9UJRwOkOabm7HdnARvkLsvfj0x6B6CRPnOrrtj0fPcxL5aA5rqa2H0dJxDDk4rw4LPTO5qN7W7VVxoANl2FXgAPxksjpzPOt6nhj4f8v6epgpSLzFWCULxhWDeaqdWFc2sUAyEZ3zrAB/Ml62dxt7Yx/3P3QDQ== Received: from [212.82.98.125] by nm31.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Feb 2015 13:53:12 -0000 Received: from [46.228.39.93] by tm18.bullet.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Feb 2015 13:53:12 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp130.mail.ir2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Feb 2015 13:53:12 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 694086.92465.bm@smtp130.mail.ir2.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: _Mz0f_8VM1m3KC.CuH.k3UC8HPJivazDgyoNrLq..Pgzi8y 52UIULKN_JSvRSEpbsLfUm2.b1coD3sCMj2XqsIADhsqVYR6ZckjIpY3OY3t 1.T2YjXLTzsPIiJWU0CGiLaW5NLq9fbbh0CDxa7xNRUxo02qbLHlRomsCwt0 OhL3yzD8ezbBrAVrsK4iGWh0vKBI42Ut_5S9bda2a2fxDZbnfMlaw7E4ux_Z _yCAqHw888MUYMw.MnOpNIuZ3hED5PafXNgF6fDMcInp0nyWb6Ymh8XldS_c mAGWU8TUQuheHD_EnvCRprAbOw0yKbI_8535TDCwqLhNp_v9Z524s5J0.wrm CMs9EruQzaX.dpNBTdigL8w7Mj7eQ1jhU6QWB.OYnHs7nDhcqXGD5HFAnmir FQeEJ28VmQ3a_gpHAwmWuGfE1CXO262o9RRyyHv42y6Gm.rSlqNjTRNnchk. Nns6xtRY28Y686VEUqJXW_uO5LzyVLlK60dIDLuueEHOI9cM.gLu6.1tV_xV AS7gk6Ir0ts.Ng9EioZB0Ra23efVJByQIaiO5 X-Yahoo-SMTP: mX392iiswBAeJNdO_s.EW62LZDJR Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:53:46 +0100 From: Eduardo Morras To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to adjust clock frequency in FreeBSD 10.1 ? Message-Id: <20150214145346.3bd06f6ffe0f7d6dc658bc64@yahoo.es> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.2 (GTK+ 2.24.25; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:53:23 -0000 On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 06:50:14 -0600 Adam Vande More wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Rick Thomas > wrote: > > > When I try to change the frequency with (e.g.) > > sysctl kern.timecounter.tc.timebase.frequency=36000000 > > > > I get > > sysctl: oid ‘kern.timecounter.tc.timebase.frequency' is read > > only > > > > Yeah, pretty clear that sysctl isn't going to help you in any way in > "man 4 timecounters" > > Is there some other way to set the frequency? > > > > Sure, but I thought keeping accurate time was the goal? If so, > sharing the output from the first command I gave you is a good start. Perhaps using powerd? It can adjust the Hz of cpu. --- --- Eduardo Morras From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 13:55:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44F0B585 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:55:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x22a.google.com (mail-lb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB10E278 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:55:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f170.google.com with SMTP id u14so20149637lbd.1 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 05:55:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=berentweb.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=w2KiZHd9VJpJrlr8Ck9tIZYagp1RHDlueYq28WOwjBc=; b=INz1RjDQWJPMejGWUtPs4zaoJ5tVKUV0GGE/Yp2s5FG/lFAYoaQKGihwd4mhE6WNC5 f9Hhga5pvD8/PBZ5Y8aPZnohy8YozYxP1Ecjslw2OKSG/5ugigWUNyYCJZSlm45txWhn 1kN8WsvzHeOyVdTw2GnmS9/JEQhtUNSgwtAyc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=w2KiZHd9VJpJrlr8Ck9tIZYagp1RHDlueYq28WOwjBc=; b=OJ6d7lPRiGyirhgwmp3no3mwDMDi0CyQwPXHYhMocVewBZIk4R22QGIdqpDZYjgA/k UPXg0hFz7A1OxlRyqn+0AuAhEN3Ugfbt6fDlSqyIvSA9x1mT4eAecXEVUJRXSNQb6/3i sOh/yQhFnfV+5SnR5yO7o5TgcwYLEpRU84aPxJ+kNf/1j7FevZz8RH2FRithRqZ0N45U qtKwWHKpPmg24ap9pVQI3T5Nj9i2u68WdLI5+3XArPAUWgAu49z/BtQRw/U9QK83j128 XKNeMDbLHkQoXnQEjM1bw9AyanIpYD4vB81V6VyniXhD5UxVKQKNx+ZcP7W9JS3nD7wd nEOg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlZ6uBONGMIYXzs7KODuQjPNp9i2eQn5/60f/4WvP8ZJwIHCqPvzwnrcwkqGJW72XFLSOsr X-Received: by 10.152.30.66 with SMTP id q2mr12579939lah.107.1423922156534; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 05:55:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from rsbsd.rsb ([31.200.16.102]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ba3sm1916710lbc.35.2015.02.14.05.55.54 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Feb 2015 05:55:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:55:52 +0200 From: Beeblebrox To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Syslogd: remote logging saves to wrong file Message-ID: <20150214155552.3216c695@rsbsd.rsb> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 13:55:59 -0000 I'm trying once more to get remote logging to work properly. The handbook s= tates (https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/configtuning-syslog.html): "On the log server, edit /etc/syslog.conf to specify +192.168.2.n/24 *.* /var/log/client1.log" This does not work however, and all client logs are being saved to host's o= wn /var/log/messages instead of the per client logfile specified in syslog.= conf. Host syslogd is started with the (-a) flag, so there's no problem with list= ening. --=20 FreeBSD_amd64_11-Current_RadeonKMS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 14:10:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 259328B8 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:10:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colorhost.siccegge.de (colorhost.siccegge.de [IPv6:2a00:f48:1026:0:f1f7:0:cf4a:fab8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF0DC39F for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:10:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=christoph-egger.org; s=2014-10-12-colorhost; h=Subject:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date:References:Cc:To:From; bh=A4Nmh1HsevDdpK0zaNjLM/jkNHoQV8ssEZINZ1iv+Sg=; b=sXUYYMQUqGSaCNvymxWy2B02Id1Db88+BK2zs3REovGL+ZNloIWSN9g7fVthX8n9zucnaT7oTFbZYZXsGDcxEEO8ZC21Kuc6N9frk4qGbSrnJbPXchQ3gm9uuRUZakYqjbUEcFjUf4lT2g5QFhvxfJjn3nO7Qi05Y1w40qqBFBrMujkEQL5kvz+3i8HLvgKN5qrV55/+ATsiaSAvPApQ0AaDyAhuae+YfINwoZc4iumHM2g6r91/MJE+cX40D5HH3dy4mInmzDxPgunW4/BJhHrq23VhGn9lUzk/uuj2S+akOFyzQP6H+DnlMZN06MClajUJo0cF4ZsR3wfeFLyu7A==; Received: from hepworth.siccegge.de ([2001:470:74e1:3151::f001]) by colorhost.siccegge.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YMdPb-0006vf-9c; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:10:14 +0000 From: Christoph Egger To: Ludovit Koren Organization: Privat References: <86iof5bkqa.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:09:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86iof5bkqa.fsf@gmail.com> (sfid-20150213_214830_373505_918E4F5E) (Ludovit Koren's message of "Fri, 13 Feb 2015 21:49:17 +0100") Message-ID: <87pp9cshya.fsf@anonymous.siccegge.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:470:74e1:3151::f001 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: christoph@christoph-egger.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on colorhost.siccegge.de X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=9.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Subject: Re: HP Proliant MicroServer Gen8 X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on colorhost.siccegge.de) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:10:20 -0000 Hi! Ludovit Koren writes: > I am considering HP Proliant MicroServer Gen8 as a home NAS. Has anybody > experience with the hardware especially with availabilty of the driver > for HP Dynamic Smart Array B120i and 332i Ethernet Adapter which are in > the server? Friend of mine runs one with FreeBSD. Network just works(tm) and for the disk controller the easiest way is to just get it into AHCI mode which also just works then on FreeBSD Christoph -- 9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731 Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 16:52:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6496EF1 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 16:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com (mail-wg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F0E883D for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 16:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id k14so19121514wgh.4 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 08:52:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:user-mail-address:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=EbQRHXP0foKmabiKTbUqF5USE4tl1a8/72qaKTNQ3J0=; b=YZ7yGVFDWNutI1H2pr0WJedmWuRuL8nasbXi/S39LzHOrl0dtYlcyY1NYh++gJYSUX PLnIjYk7/ACrpXoWJWakbzktMyvlndyIm+tg+V6FsA1tbveNv6DeSeQcxcNieMVPbROM brzVuz07xU/bRYZ/VXHk42gKuWoJWrkoT9y1r8CM3JjMhkhQJlhgxONR5fL3XTCkTGbT rt0vd7ohU0Woh2u0MPwpogqlfs2Y/pWek/GNlkmrNOWoc8O4KZSKtoS8Ak3SRDHbjULF V8i4afLmpD5QZ4BgOHZwk0NHAg7uUrS9ZdQA40QixmuEecnRZ4ggoe/wt9gW7Gvd4iXx 9aEQ== X-Received: by 10.194.84.176 with SMTP id a16mr30438616wjz.113.1423932762699; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 08:52:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from jedi.localdomain (adsl-dyn205.78-98-197.t-com.sk. [78.98.197.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c4sm7740616wik.0.2015.02.14.08.52.41 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Feb 2015 08:52:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by jedi.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 125) id DDAC9905D; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:53:42 +0100 (CET) Received: by jedi.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 10F5A5318; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:48:32 +0100 (CET) From: Ludovit Koren To: Christoph Egger Subject: Re: HP Proliant MicroServer Gen8 References: <86iof5bkqa.fsf@gmail.com> <87pp9cshya.fsf@anonymous.siccegge.de> User-Mail-Address: ludovit.koren@gmail.com Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:48:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87pp9cshya.fsf@anonymous.siccegge.de> (Christoph Egger's message of "Sat, 14 Feb 2015 15:09:33 +0100") Message-ID: <86fva830db.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Ludovit Koren , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 16:52:44 -0000 >>>>> Christoph Egger writes: > Hi! > Ludovit Koren writes: >> I am considering HP Proliant MicroServer Gen8 as a home NAS. Has anybody >> experience with the hardware especially with availabilty of the driver >> for HP Dynamic Smart Array B120i and 332i Ethernet Adapter which are in >> the server? > Friend of mine runs one with FreeBSD. Network just works(tm) and for the > disk controller the easiest way is to just get it into AHCI mode which > also just works then on FreeBSD Thank you very much lk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 18:14:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6186FB7B for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glockenspiel.complete.org (glockenspiel.complete.org [192.99.4.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B1211E2 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [63.245.179.205] (helo=hephaestus.lan.complete.org) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtps (with TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (TLS peer CN christoph.complete.org, certificate verified) (Exim 4.80) id 1YMgmg-0000ct-B6 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:45:38 -0600 Received: from [::1] by hephaestus.lan.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YMgmd-0003YH-9Y for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:45:35 -0600 Message-ID: <54DF89BE.6010005@complete.org> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:45:34 -0600 From: John Goerzen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Ports/Packages and release engineering Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:14:18 -0000 Hello folks, FreeBSD was my first Unix roughly 20 years ago now, and I'm looking to pick it back up again. (I've been using Debian since then.) My knowledge is, ahem, dated ;-) I have some questions pertaining to the ports and packages -- hopefully this is the right list for them (I could take it to -ports if that would be better.) The questions mainly relate to two main lines of thought: ensuring consistency within the ports/packages collection, and ensuring consistency between ports and the base system. A lot of my questions may be "OK, I'm used to this happening in way X. What is the FreeBSD way= ?" So, it looks to me that ports is essentially always a -CURRENT tree. I don't see any reference in the handbook to selecting different branches of ports, or different branches that might happen to match different RELEASE versions. How, then, is quality maintained within the ports?=20 Is it just luck of the draw on when a local update happens that it gets a version that didn't have a silly bug that got corrected a day later, or how do ports get tested before being released to everyone? One thing I know from Debian is that there we often have "transitions" from Debian's unstable (roughly -CURRENT) to testing (roughly -STABLE) when certain groups of packages have to be transitioned in sync in order to avoid breakage. This might be things relating to KDE (such as Digikam), or another example is Haskell, where new versions of the compiler ghc introduce a different ABI requiring all the Haskell module packages to be rebuilt. There are plenty of examples, though. How are these handled in FreeBSD? When packages are updated, what happens to their config files and rc.d scripts? Are files in /usr/local/etc, /etc, {/usr/local,}/etc/rc.d never modified automatically, or is the administrator prompted on what to do (as in Debian)? If they are never modified automatically, how does a person know what changes to make after an update? This brings me to the question of how the ports/packages relate to the base system. A couple of things surprised me in researching this question: the first being the comment in the Handbook to reinstall the entire ports/packages system after a base system upgrade to a new major version, due to ABI incompatibilities. I would have thought backward ABI compatibility would be a pretty important design goal in FreeBSD.=20 The other thing was that ports are only tested against -CURRENT and -STABLE, therefore implying that even the current -RELEASE may not have working ports (let alone even an LTS -RELEASE). That leaves me concerned about the long-term viability of managing FreeBSD systems, but also wondering if I'm missing out on some important bit of information he= re. Speaking of which, when the base system is upgraded, how are administrator customizations in /etc and related configuration locations preserved? (Same question as with the ports updates above.) Another small question: I ran something like "pkg install xserver-xorg digikam vim screen bash" the other day in my FreeBSD test VM. I discovered quite a bit of information was printed out at the end from various packages, which scrolled off the screen. Is there a way to re-display all that information? It seems if it's important enough to display, it's important enough to display long enough to read ;-) Thanks everyone, John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 18:36:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7507D8E for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79E87639 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id va2so30521682obc.1 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:36:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=RMIei+tMWRMerIYcPyoC6jvIzfAdiTB//JdTB1fl9gQ=; b=k6l+6G+KnxkN7iEHH+GM9XqtzskLC7x2hErk6+E3/5mmFwEyuykxZcMLBkcIBfjKzL 1eDyf9dBLW3eV5iCPEj6pnYrq5w/cnCdspEPp8iA4MznfAse5NQrx4r80E/6bxpo1h+z 0sHB73jZMhBpqXe1uoW0HhCtHqgAmWIJ9EX0bMk2d6ZMpJmZA4SSxUnXOvkpFlzhNVE+ ddzHluxDrsYsBHJr/2A/RwS00qI0XmEklE4owYu/rwsWJSbqUpFYGCIvrS8arNu28UOm atGjeW8QMQmQ8EQGjhAJCPCD4QV6orptBxVAk1jseRb9BPt0/OdJTY8a64wKJ2b/kIE6 KaqA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.102.41 with SMTP id fl9mr2652986oeb.33.1423938987743; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:36:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.247.74 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:36:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54DF89BE.6010005@complete.org> References: <54DF89BE.6010005@complete.org> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:36:27 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ports/Packages and release engineering From: jungle Boogie To: John Goerzen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:36:28 -0000 Hi John, On 14 February 2015 at 09:45, John Goerzen wrote: > So, it looks to me that ports is essentially always a -CURRENT tree. I > don't see any reference in the handbook to selecting different branches > of ports, or different branches that might happen to match different > RELEASE versions. How, then, is quality maintained within the ports? > Is it just luck of the draw on when a local update happens that it gets > a version that didn't have a silly bug that got corrected a day later, > or how do ports get tested before being released to everyone? That's not my understanding. I think/thought ports will need to compile on all supported x86, including 8.4. Ports are often updated but that doesn't mean they don't run on older versions. You can track ports here: https://www.freshports.org/ It's important to read UPDATING: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/UPDATING (also at /usr/ports) Sorry, I don't have enough experience to comfortably answer the other questions. I will say that I have seen the message reinstall the entire ports/packages system. I saw that going from 10.0 to 10.1 and I didn't re-install any ports/packages and had no issues. > Another small question: I ran something like "pkg install xserver-xorg > digikam vim screen bash" the other day in my FreeBSD test VM. I > discovered quite a bit of information was printed out at the end from > various packages, which scrolled off the screen. Is there a way to > re-display all that information? It seems if it's important enough to > display, it's important enough to display long enough to read ;-) IME, pkg is just telling you what's being installed. In fact, I find the one-line-per package better than debian's many packages on one line. I use tmux so here's my screen install: pkg install screen Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. The following 1 packages will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: screen: 4.2.1_5 The process will require 958 KiB more space. Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) [1/1] Installing screen-4.2.1_5... [1/1] Extracting screen-4.2.1_5: 100% If you later want to see versions of packages, you can use `pkg version` For instance: tmux-1.9a = -- ------- inum: 883510009027723 sip: jungleboogie@sip2sip.info xmpp: jungle-boogie@jit.si From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 18:57:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FA565E7 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-f179.google.com (mail-ie0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A79F847 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iecrl12 with SMTP id rl12so24038642iec.4 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:56:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4Ltgn2e/fOqBCjVcBsW0cTWYGuo3e63hJqFnhS7+NM8=; b=qUfKUgAQXyofQdbzvCALAVlEsz7a6bSzM3sSXkVkSAuhmI+V892T6moJVnHEhUFy3d uKmm3qWuDVsrJW2SN9kHv/WFvdIA0OgRxpoCzSr7DhYF+znCawgzjBL9w4f3ve4WCmbY J8W99032/LzYpRHr7vI5wRMgcLAv6mDbzdRuhFD68DL3t5FI2zadYQTl8kfDnoVsBrse tSzLAhiCBih7el53i9jOoIGrH/wKoLA08sQaua1spALzcDL4lX90Qr62upFnrFRHdBLw y4zJeqnBsfeuLU8YTM7B8aLAzYMLKhU/hL/4kw5cOgne8MsaCNVFGo2/q+pKZYw4KJmU qWyA== X-Received: by 10.107.25.135 with SMTP id 129mr21034126ioz.44.1423940219183; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:56:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([73.3.70.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id io9sm5430685igb.0.2015.02.14.10.56.58 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:56:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54DF9A79.6070601@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:56:57 -0700 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports/Packages and release engineering References: <54DF89BE.6010005@complete.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:57:06 -0000 On 02/14/2015 11:36 AM, jungle Boogie wrote: >> >Another small question: I ran something like "pkg install xserver-xorg >> >digikam vim screen bash" the other day in my FreeBSD test VM. I >> >discovered quite a bit of information was printed out at the end from >> >various packages, which scrolled off the screen. Is there a way to >> >re-display all that information? It seems if it's important enough to >> >display, it's important enough to display long enough to read;-) One way to save all that stuff that scrolls off the screen is to run the pkg command as follows: script /tmp/pkg.out pkg install xserver-xorg digikam vim screen bash 2>&1 exit now you can view /tmp/pkg.out for all the stuff that scrolled off the screen. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 19:00:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D827498D for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:00:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0121.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.121]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CEB487C for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:00:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.21] (73.5.142.244) by BN3PR0301MB0834.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.154.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.81.19; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 18:44:49 +0000 Message-ID: <54DF979B.4050301@my.hennepintech.edu> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 12:44:43 -0600 From: Andrew Berg User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: Re: Ports/Packages and release engineering References: <54DF89BE.6010005@complete.org> In-Reply-To: <54DF89BE.6010005@complete.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [73.5.142.244] X-ClientProxiedBy: CY1PR0601CA0018.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (25.160.162.28) To BN3PR0301MB0834.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (25.160.154.144) Authentication-Results: freebsd.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN3PR0301MB0834; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004); SRVR:BN3PR0301MB0834; X-Forefront-PRVS: 0487C0DB7E X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(6049001)(24454002)(51704005)(77096005)(2950100001)(88552001)(42186005)(107886001)(89122001)(87266999)(87976001)(33656002)(2351001)(59896002)(92566002)(50466002)(64126003)(23676002)(54356999)(110136001)(65816999)(80316001)(50986999)(83506001)(450100001)(62966003)(77156002)(46102003)(76176999)(47776003)(122386002)(40100003)(75432002)(556974002)(65806001)(86362001)(66066001)(65956001)(89472002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN3PR0301MB0834; H:[10.0.0.21]; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:nov; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en; X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN3PR0301MB0834; X-OriginatorOrg: my.hennepintech.edu X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Feb 2015 18:44:49.9909 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN3PR0301MB0834 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:00:20 -0000 On 2015.02.14 11:45, John Goerzen wrote: > So, it looks to me that ports is essentially always a -CURRENT tree. I > don't see any reference in the handbook to selecting different branches > of ports, or different branches that might happen to match different > RELEASE versions. It's similar to -CURRENT, I suppose. There are quarterly branches where big changes are put off until the next quarter, but security updates are still applied. There are actually tags for each release, though they are not generally useful except as reference points. Ports are made to work with all supported releases. > How, then, is quality maintained within the ports? > Is it just luck of the draw on when a local update happens that it gets > a version that didn't have a silly bug that got corrected a day later, > or how do ports get tested before being released to everyone? Generally, maintainers are responsible for their individual ports. Larger changes (especially ones that affect significant chunks of the tree) are reviewed and approved before being committed. Mistakes and oversights do happen, even with several people looking at the patch. > One thing I know from Debian is that there we often have "transitions" > from Debian's unstable (roughly -CURRENT) to testing (roughly -STABLE) > when certain groups of packages have to be transitioned in sync in order > to avoid breakage. This might be things relating to KDE (such as > Digikam), or another example is Haskell, where new versions of the > compiler ghc introduce a different ABI requiring all the Haskell module > packages to be rebuilt. There are plenty of examples, though. How are > these handled in FreeBSD? Things are kept in sync with upstream as far as major versions go. For example, Python 2.7, 3.3, and 3.4 are all still supported upstream, so there are individual ports for each, and you don't really need to worry about your default Python suddenly being upgraded from 2.7 to 3.4 unless you explicitly make it so. This goes for anything where multiple versions are supported upstream - gcc, clang, Apache, perl, etc.. As I said above, ports are expected to work on all supported versions of FreeBSD. It's not "version X of KDE works on 8 and version Y works on 9 and version Z works on 10", it's "version Z works on 8, 9, and 10". > > When packages are updated, what happens to their config files and rc.d > scripts? Are files in /usr/local/etc, /etc, {/usr/local,}/etc/rc.d > never modified automatically, or is the administrator prompted on what > to do (as in Debian)? If they are never modified automatically, how > does a person know what changes to make after an update? rc scripts shouldn't be modified by the user. Configuration files aren't tracked by ports because it's silly to push a configuration on users. Ports *should* come with example configuration files, and if there are any changes to be made to configuration that aren't obvious (a major version change should signal you to go look at upstream docs, but sometimes upstream changes things like that between major releases for no good reason), then maintainers *should* include a message. Again, maintainers are responsible for their ports. > This brings me to the question of how the ports/packages relate to the > base system. A couple of things surprised me in researching this > question: the first being the comment in the Handbook to reinstall the > entire ports/packages system after a base system upgrade to a new major > version, due to ABI incompatibilities. I would have thought backward > ABI compatibility would be a pretty important design goal in FreeBSD. It is only a goal between minor versions. New major versions are free to break lots of things, but new minor versions must not break anything. This is the whole point of having separate release branches. > The other thing was that ports are only tested against -CURRENT and > -STABLE, therefore implying that even the current -RELEASE may not have > working ports (let alone even an LTS -RELEASE). That leaves me > concerned about the long-term viability of managing FreeBSD systems, but > also wondering if I'm missing out on some important bit of information here. Ports are almost always tested against release versions, and having ports work on releases is far, far more important than having them work on -STABLE or -CURRENT. -CURRENT isn't even considered "supported" by the ports tree, and having things work on it is best effort since it can easily have breaking changes with little more than a post to the current mailing list as warning. > Speaking of which, when the base system is upgraded, how are > administrator customizations in /etc and related configuration locations > preserved? (Same question as with the ports updates above.) Files are merged, and you decide how to handle changes. > Another small question: I ran something like "pkg install xserver-xorg > digikam vim screen bash" the other day in my FreeBSD test VM. I > discovered quite a bit of information was printed out at the end from > various packages, which scrolled off the screen. Is there a way to > re-display all that information? It seems if it's important enough to > display, it's important enough to display long enough to read ;-) portmaster does some things to make sure that all the pkg-messages are displayed at the end and piped into less if necessary. I suppose you could make a feature request for pkg to do that. I suspect many have not found it that much of an issue because they can use tmux or some other console to scroll up. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 19:17:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86436EF6 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (pb-sasl1.int.icgroup.com [208.72.237.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDD6A17 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3F7356F6; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:17:07 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=sasl; bh= Y3Jq0HYj/mt1HRsgvu1vQN8rgLw=; b=ZtMUKVxFyPlV1puYWU8O9+N4psejC/wY fD2swuMZJxVFLkxP0TKUZls9JEK+cIwSmIwrKOzcOAbY0L5BosYJtwu8d1Rt5/6s 7+U13cLZfltGmpUJ2hnLzUT6ga6rCb7rjohOwSk+G5WLHtHkrZCCy5yCSnQ9QCUi wkqv+9UvDSs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; q=dns; s= sasl; b=xMT8xIj7s/esKBGSdPIclzb6o1rcDi7ATJaNnYGtY6D+4zAWy92ct99r YhZ9WVMhykCFt6/3ecEn7iX8AQWfJ9blCFkhz2/tsjKO/4+HK6lm0epNzuPoKX7I wEkE6k5c0w5EZge04Cb2X3Qk8oky48RNzVKJFhrA6uiZvwxT96A= Received: from pb-sasl1.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2981E356F5; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:17:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from almini.rcthomas.org (unknown [208.53.120.31]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38C49356F4; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:17:06 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: How to adjust clock frequency in FreeBSD 10.1 ? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: Rick Thomas In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 11:17:03 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <2F352B9F-A1CA-47D3-B17D-4C7918B80636@pobox.com> References: To: Adam Vande More X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 10C396A4-B47E-11E4-927E-8FDD009B7A5A-02150157!pb-sasl1.pobox.com Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:17:09 -0000 On Feb 14, 2015, at 4:50 AM, Adam Vande More = wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Rick Thomas = wrote: >=20 >> When I try to change the frequency with (e.g.) >> sysctl kern.timecounter.tc.timebase.frequency=3D36000000 >>=20 >> I get >> sysctl: oid =91kern.timecounter.tc.timebase.frequency' is read = only >>=20 >=20 > Yeah, pretty clear that sysctl isn't going to help you in any way in = "man 4 > timecounters" >=20 > Is there some other way to set the frequency? >>=20 >=20 > Sure, but I thought keeping accurate time was the goal? If so, = sharing the > output from the first command I gave you is a good start. Ooops=85 Sorry! I thought I had already done that. In any case, here = it is: > [root@grey ~]# sysctl kern.timecounter > kern.timecounter.fast_gettime: 1 > kern.timecounter.tick: 1 > kern.timecounter.choice: timebase(0) dummy(-1000000) > kern.timecounter.hardware: timebase > kern.timecounter.alloweddeviation: 5 > kern.timecounter.stepwarnings: 0 > kern.timecounter.tc.timebase.mask: 4294967295 > kern.timecounter.tc.timebase.counter: 1981288884 > kern.timecounter.tc.timebase.frequency: 33290001 > kern.timecounter.tc.timebase.quality: 0 > [root@grey ~]#=20 I=92m guessing that by tuning the timebase.frequency number, I can make = the clock run effectively slower or faster. If I find the right value, = I can correct the problem I=92m seeing with ntpd. In case it matters, this is a powerpc Macintosh G4, so the only = available timecounter is =93timebase=94. Switching to a different = timecounter is not an available option. Rick= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 19:27:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2BB480C for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:27:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23302B27 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:27:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t1EJRhlj006344 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:27:43 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t1EJRhlj006344 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t1EJRhlj006344; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral Message-ID: <54DFA1A2.50508@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:27:30 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports/Packages and release engineering References: <54DF89BE.6010005@complete.org> In-Reply-To: <54DF89BE.6010005@complete.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="L8vktwO1GQU52G09k7MgBR2xoFUakK07k" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 19:27:51 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --L8vktwO1GQU52G09k7MgBR2xoFUakK07k Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 14/02/2015 17:45, John Goerzen wrote: > Another small question: I ran something like "pkg install xserver-xorg > digikam vim screen bash" the other day in my FreeBSD test VM. I > discovered quite a bit of information was printed out at the end from > various packages, which scrolled off the screen. Is there a way to > re-display all that information? It seems if it's important enough to > display, it's important enough to display long enough to read ;-) pkg info -D pkgname will show you the package message again. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --L8vktwO1GQU52G09k7MgBR2xoFUakK07k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJU36GuXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATIVUP/RFL7j1I8hu1fQMoVHg+tDSR LFxHFrbN7x8A78WvpWqE31J2kSfic9sk7JKx+P2tieKNzN/KEIIsrKcqjEz1sz00 gmJBR6wQQP6Pkh60KnAOcO1iw75eyNpgUzU21LszQxlwJ0aiHTWLpyaEM7ZtGgTN EVHDKdDRG7o6yhpF1ISVwOJP9mNwADQxwSiS++qkkfBFiLLDHwxp13bQTXGA//Ud L89vJJnRnhwgCmXDrlhgzDJLH3pWQB6fKPXe3OMhH3k6lPr/L8WqS4lChWm/SzbU cqGCmT5cdik27NPHYGAw44FfJXPAtYgdoRxDHHrH7Go3CHvbprmETIcxz3xO6E1E IztcJ4tSM5h/svNlOb8PNAuAzEoJFVo1BvTTX9LpwezpaCf12Ye/XAFJXDivr2Sp /TnWqk+n0QYRBBra89l0r/up8ETPVMq3jE0Sw6SCDC3n8TUccDZpDrE7A9Pb8w9v MR2tvSUkZ89gLbQQgDoB7bo+dIW0SNs8MCMRA2nAhbFb6nTmjzT4jIyPKMxAhCai ke1BYVL9174KGdnJtUv0VU1nEiL+eWeB4PmJgnAWSqYoe/87QHc+GMldrG0KQInv JYj60yTCUsxz8ne0po+1isNQR4FNa8rNVgMUIm0fb2MSV6MpwyIkfMpFiriTQxEL uSZzAVxGUc6MsgnZDy99 =54QH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --L8vktwO1GQU52G09k7MgBR2xoFUakK07k-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 20:00:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDC3D815 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "ca.infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 580E0E3C for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:00:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t1EK0hju007131 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:00:44 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=infracaninophile.co.uk DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t1EK0hju007131 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1423944044; bh=qv5PfykOllAgtAvD46wZ9c2PxGSZmdkWkRjSwtnCwRU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Sat,=2014=20Feb=202015=2020:00:34=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-questi ons@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Ports/Packages=20and=20release=20 engineering|References:=20<54DF89BE.6010005@complete.org>|In-Reply -To:=20<54DF89BE.6010005@complete.org>; b=KCsNlIQax7SgvZzrfGXCHIEECEiIeTHtS5UrSLdft8FZcCIIaKMUau5I3U0VvBqH6 S/vumVTRa1NXfIHSP8RbJIWdTg75t+Fs+d8wTFdBWYYcAMXmgX/Z1z1NtFtsm1Drot lkRjIZNfRggIYV+ZwhvJ3fK2ZSPSelAGRuVIbMCY= Message-ID: <54DFA962.2010509@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:00:34 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports/Packages and release engineering References: <54DF89BE.6010005@complete.org> In-Reply-To: <54DF89BE.6010005@complete.org> OpenPGP: id=E1ECF9BB Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fDlnNM4IELDQL1VUsoEwKAeU5VA7ikuvt" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.6 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 20:00:49 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --fDlnNM4IELDQL1VUsoEwKAeU5VA7ikuvt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 14/02/2015 17:45, John Goerzen wrote: > So, it looks to me that ports is essentially always a -CURRENT tree. I= > don't see any reference in the handbook to selecting different branches= > of ports, or different branches that might happen to match different > RELEASE versions. How, then, is quality maintained within the ports?=20 > Is it just luck of the draw on when a local update happens that it gets= > a version that didn't have a silly bug that got corrected a day later, > or how do ports get tested before being released to everyone? Correct. There can be mistakes committed to the ports. In fact it happens reasonably frequently. However, we do have some quite stringent requirements about integration testing before and after commits are made: certainly anyone submitting patches is nowadays asked to provide 'poudriere testport' output showing the package builds successfully and passes the built-in tests the ports tree uses. Committers are also meant to run these sorts of tests before they commit anything, but they are generally trusted to behave sensibly and don't have to provide proof of doing so. There's also an automated testing process which will generate warning messages to port maintainers / committers if any port fails to build properly. So while mistakes do happen, they tend to only affect individual ports and then for only fairly short periods of time. Generally you're pretty unlikely to run into problems on that score. > One thing I know from Debian is that there we often have "transitions" > from Debian's unstable (roughly -CURRENT) to testing (roughly -STABLE) > when certain groups of packages have to be transitioned in sync in orde= r > to avoid breakage. This might be things relating to KDE (such as > Digikam), or another example is Haskell, where new versions of the > compiler ghc introduce a different ABI requiring all the Haskell module= > packages to be rebuilt. There are plenty of examples, though. How are= > these handled in FreeBSD? Yes. When really important sub-systems get updated, or changes are made that affect large numbers of ports, there will be an exp-run, which is an experimental build of the entire ports tree to ensure everything still works. > When packages are updated, what happens to their config files and rc.d > scripts? Are files in /usr/local/etc, /etc, {/usr/local,}/etc/rc.d > never modified automatically, or is the administrator prompted on what > to do (as in Debian)? If they are never modified automatically, how > does a person know what changes to make after an update? Ports don't put any config files into /etc -- only /usr/local/etc. Similarly ports only put startup scripts into /usr/local/etc/rc.d -- this division of ports and base is one of the FreeBSD fundamentals, which I'm sure you'll be recalling from your previous experience now. Configuration files are *not* owned by ports per-se, so they aren't necessarily removed or modified when a port is deleted or updated. Instead the port owns various sample configuration files, which generally have the same name as the actual config with '.sample' appended (other naming variations exist, but '.sample' is by far the commonest.) These the port will replace at will. When a port is installed the first time then the sample config file is copied to the real config file name. When the port is removed or upgraded, then the config file is removed if and only if it is identical to the sample file.= There isn't a capacity for doing a three-way merge in the ports at the moment, so if the upstream has made incompatible changes to the config file format the administrator will have to merge those manually. This is fortunately a fairly rare event. 3-way merge capability has been added to pkg(8) but that capability hasn't been applied to the ports yet.= > This brings me to the question of how the ports/packages relate to the > base system. A couple of things surprised me in researching this > question: the first being the comment in the Handbook to reinstall the > entire ports/packages system after a base system upgrade to a new major= > version, due to ABI incompatibilities. I would have thought backward > ABI compatibility would be a pretty important design goal in FreeBSD.=20 > The other thing was that ports are only tested against -CURRENT and > -STABLE, therefore implying that even the current -RELEASE may not have= > working ports (let alone even an LTS -RELEASE). That leaves me > concerned about the long-term viability of managing FreeBSD systems, bu= t > also wondering if I'm missing out on some important bit of information = here. Reinstalling all your ports on a major version upgrade is still a requirement, yes. But it is something that may not remain so for a great deal of time longer, given the advent of symbol versioning in the base system shared libraries. While you can still *run* a port installed for, say, 9.3-RELEASE once you've upgraded to 10.1-RELEASE, until everything in the base system has appropriate symbol versioning applied you'll very quickly get into a pickle if you try and update some ports selectively: effectively you would end up with one binary trying to dynamically link against two or more different versions of the same shared library: something that always ends in tears. So, yes, for now: reinstall all your ports when you do a major version upgrade. Note that freebsd-update(8) advises reinstalling all ports even if you're only doing a minor version upgrade (eg. 10.0 to 10.1) This is *not* necessary. > Speaking of which, when the base system is upgraded, how are > administrator customizations in /etc and related configuration location= s > preserved? (Same question as with the ports updates above.) It depends how you go about updating the base system, but all the widely used methods run you through some sort of 3-way merge process to handle stuff under /etc and the like. It's built into freebsd-update(8), and if you're upgrading by building from source, then you should be running mergemaster(8) as a standard part of that process. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk --fDlnNM4IELDQL1VUsoEwKAeU5VA7ikuvt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJU36lrXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATEGwQAIBdRuVKN1rnKGJ+6pIC7wiQ bW2RlbIAOrwM9CDXHri24DLMMxmgGnFU2QGAduKY1QzwBsmXQ+9yIANSI3NG5X1h KzZYKC2IzZiad6dKBiH0i2dKj2w5bCsTzXO5lS0/ImcuPAzHpYWhh4fODmnDqlUB eocRtU2qcWYDPsiYjeiUdrFKhO4ms4yvePG+aOh/c7x5AdHM9WErTL/1upNShgoY 5Rb42uOJoKZwGVQ5hbCEnf1ZoaNDkR1rHV5H+A1lAwb4p42a9V9HJIe3aGEFe6ss jkmu3vSa3KWfL7XnhSyi5DS3/5wu4oXEfs7a6OIhAsxkpqTgBY88KAmK61+8cCl9 0T5t1T65WXjc8xgCH8fSX/4Jw5leAytHqxuxzJqfRP9IZbHArOG+jLV/2TVT43+N ZIbla9Nl66KSZYimJ5O33dMv0HCYbN9ll4XOWHvWpHDggmdGd6yhuYaeU8Kzso2R Pies6e9oySSJosjqhvFSiyH1YQl/gEBbfCAMSbEfhIQboS3FQsC6CG2NOHaMlL7a 1z6ClqljuaxXxuZVK63P+t60jEbwiMx+4FOZ65bhoxX/QKTrJu0oBn39E03YRgA+ GYNnU18cc27wjhFkV4TzftmjO9ZPMIArEee2YRR+ik7z5LKRAoHFWiWX4xYz5O95 P/Zxm/yK4nV5NsRHaaAf =fG9v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fDlnNM4IELDQL1VUsoEwKAeU5VA7ikuvt-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 23:25:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A097E26 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 23:25:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01263390 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 23:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YMm59-0002Pj-Bd for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 00:25:03 +0100 Received: from 63-245-179-205.ip.mtelco.net ([63-245-179-205.ip.mtelco.net]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 00:25:03 +0100 Received: from jgoerzen by 63-245-179-205.ip.mtelco.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 00:25:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: John Goerzen Subject: Re: Ports/Packages and release engineering Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 23:20:53 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 52 Message-ID: References: <54DF89BE.6010005@complete.org> <54DFA962.2010509@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 63.245.179.205 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/31.0 Iceweasel/31.4.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 23:25:13 -0000 Matthew Seaman infracaninophile.co.uk> writes: > > On 14/02/2015 17:45, John Goerzen wrote: > Configuration files are *not* owned by ports per-se, so they aren't > necessarily removed or modified when a port is deleted or updated. > Instead the port owns various sample configuration files, which > generally have the same name as the actual config with '.sample' > appended (other naming variations exist, but '.sample' is by far the > commonest.) These the port will replace at will. When a port is > installed the first time then the sample config file is copied to the > real config file name. When the port is removed or upgraded, then the > config file is removed if and only if it is identical to the sample file. > > There isn't a capacity for doing a three-way merge in the ports at the > moment, so if the upstream has made incompatible changes to the config > file format the administrator will have to merge those manually. This > is fortunately a fairly rare event. 3-way merge capability has been > added to pkg(8) but that capability hasn't been applied to the ports yet. Matthew, thank you for your very helpful reply. A few small outstanding questions: I actually expect to use pkg(8) rather than ports almost all of the time. So it sounds nice that pkg(8) can do this, but I am confused about the relation between ports and pkg. I see some rather contradictory information out there, and wonder if this changed in FreeBSD 9 or 10? I see some people saying that a person always needs to tell the ports system to register with pkg, but then I don't see anything in the Handbook saying to do that these days. So if a port only supplies a .sample, on what basis would pkg do a 3-way merge, since nobody is likely to modify .sample directly? > Reinstalling all your ports on a major version upgrade is still a > requirement, yes. But it is something that may not remain so for a > great deal of time longer, given the advent of symbol versioning in the > base system shared libraries. While you can still *run* a port > installed for, say, 9.3-RELEASE once you've upgraded to 10.1-RELEASE, > until everything in the base system has appropriate symbol versioning > applied you'll very quickly get into a pickle if you try and update some > ports selectively: effectively you would end up with one binary trying > to dynamically link against two or more different versions of the same > shared library: something that always ends in tears. Ah. OK. So is there really that much churn in base system libraries? It's not necessarily an issue for me, but just a surprise; I'm used to systems where most binaries that are a decade old still work fine on modern systems. Thanks again, John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 23:31:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B1CA4D5 for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 23:31:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from glockenspiel.complete.org (glockenspiel.complete.org [192.99.4.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8BB465B for ; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 23:31:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [63.245.179.205] (helo=hephaestus.lan.complete.org) by glockenspiel.complete.org with esmtps (with TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (TLS peer CN christoph.complete.org, certificate verified) (Exim 4.80) id 1YMmBK-0001qy-TU for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:31:27 -0600 Received: from [::1] by hephaestus.lan.complete.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1YMmBH-0008Ap-LX for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:31:23 -0600 Message-ID: <54DFDACA.3030709@complete.org> Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 17:31:22 -0600 From: John Goerzen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Is pkg silently ignoring failures? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2015 23:31:29 -0000 Hello, So today I ran a pkg install which included nspluginwrapper. Apparently I should have first run kldload linux before running pkg install nspluginwrapper, but I didn't. I happened to be capturing the output of the session under script(1), but the only reason I knew anything was amiss was that I happened to glance at the screen at the right time. I got errors like: [132/681] Installing linux_base-c6-6.6_3... sysctl: unknown oid 'compat.linux.osrelease': No such file or directory linuxulator is not (kld)loaded, exiting pkg: PRE-INSTALL script failed Extracting linux_base-c6-6.6_3: 100% +++ Some programs may need linprocfs, please add it to /etc/fstab! +++ Running linux ldconfig... ELF binary type "3" not known. /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig: Exec format error Extracting linux-c6-expat-2.0.1_1: 100% ELF binary type "3" not known. /compat/linux/sbin/ldconfig: Exec format error pkg: POST-INSTALL script failed and so forth. So all these pre-install and post-install scripts are failing. I assume this means the package isn't properly installed or configured. But: # pkg install linux_base-c6 Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) The most recent version of packages are already installed So my questions are: 1) Shouldn't pkg have given me some indication at the end that "packages X, Y, and Z didn't install correctly"? 2) How do I figure out which packages were impacted (without painstaking through the entire output of script)? 3) How do I fix it? Thanks! John