From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jul 12 04:21:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BB4997ACD for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 04:21:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reg@dwf.com) Received: from deneb.dwf.com (70-90-202-97-Albuquerque.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.90.202.97]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4993930 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 04:21:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from reg@dwf.com) Received: from deneb.dwf.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by deneb.dwf.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id t6C427Dg001385; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 22:02:07 -0600 Message-Id: <201507120402.t6C427Dg001385@deneb.dwf.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3 To: FreeBSD questions , reg@dwf.com Subject: FreeBSD install. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 22:02:07 -0600 From: reg@dwf.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 04:21:44 -0000 OK, Im confused, or not impressed, choose one. I have been trying for several months to put PCBSD 10.1 and FreeBSD 10.1 on one disk. I finally gave up, and am installing FreeBSD over the top of my previous PCBSD. sigh. After several attempts to put FreeBSD in a partition on the disk I gave up, and let it have the full 500GB disk. Mumph. The install seems to go well, I give it an IP address, hostname, etc, and get down to the point where you reboot. I say yes to the reboot, and instead of rebooting from disk, I get the bios messages (Im using a mbr) that say its trying to boot from the ethernet. I went back and did this a 2nd time, just to be sure, but got the same result. What gives? I dont remember having this sort of problem when I ran FreeBSD 20 years ago? And why isnt the installer smart enough to install to a partition, every other OS in existence can do that. -- Reg.Clemens reg@dwf.com From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jul 12 06:03:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADAE998E31 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:03:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from douhisi.pair.com (douhisi.pair.com [209.68.5.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3BA6FD8 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:03:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from [10.2.2.1] (pool-173-48-121-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [173.48.121.235]) by douhisi.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 151B43F6FC for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 02:03:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <55A20318.8010506@sneakertech.com> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 02:03:04 -0400 From: Quartz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: Questions about freebsd-update References: <559C6B73.8050509@sneakertech.com> <559EA8B8.8080701@sneakertech.com> <559ED47E.8050905@hiwaay.net> <559F25F8.1030508@sneakertech.com> <559F2853.5000103@sneakertech.com> <55A12660.9090304@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <55A12660.9090304@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:03:16 -0000 >When you install Windows and a service pack, you can't stop in > the half of the service pack installation. > > freebsd-update make the same thing like windows update, it will install > security updates. Well, sorta. With Windows or OSX or whatever you can get a list of all the updates it wants to install and you can check/uncheck them individually, and you can download a lot of the major updates/KBs/service packs separately and install them offline if you need to. I was hoping there was something similar for FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jul 12 06:33:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E059995C6 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:33:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from douhisi.pair.com (douhisi.pair.com [209.68.5.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4D5D1C6F for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:33:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from [10.2.2.1] (pool-173-48-121-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [173.48.121.235]) by douhisi.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 377C93F6E1; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 02:33:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <55A20A31.5090309@sneakertech.com> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 02:33:21 -0400 From: Quartz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: reg@dwf.com CC: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD install. References: <201507120402.t6C427Dg001385@deneb.dwf.com> In-Reply-To: <201507120402.t6C427Dg001385@deneb.dwf.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:33:24 -0000 > I say yes to the reboot, and instead of rebooting from disk, I > get the bios messages (Im using a mbr) that say its trying to > boot from the ethernet. I think first you need to narrow this down and figure out if this is a case where the bios doesn't want to see it, or *can't*. Try messing with your boot device order and disable net/PXE booting, rearrange it so the HD is first, and/or bring up the 'boot device menu' during boot (usually hold F12) and see if you can force it to pick the drive. > And why isnt the installer smart enough to install to a partition, > every other OS in existence can do that. The installer has always been rather primitive honestly. The boot0/boot1 loaders aren't amazing either. I think your best bet (assuming you want to give it another go) is install PC-BSD first with grub and set up and format all the partitions with their necessary gpt labels there, then boot the FreeBSD installer but drop into the shell mode and manually mount your partitions and manually extract all the stuff into them. Then add what you need to your grub configs. Here's an old link about doing something like this for FreeBSD v8, I think most of it still applies to v10. http://www.freebsdonline.com/content/view/732/531/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jul 12 08:11:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B86B9995DE for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:11:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hans@beastielabs.net) Received: from testsoekris.hotsoft.nl (unknown [IPv6:2001:888:1227:0:200:24ff:fec9:5934]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A2AE199 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:11:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hans@beastielabs.net) Received: from beastie.hotsoft.nl (beastie.hotsoft.nl [IPv6:2001:888:1227:0:219:d1ff:fee8:91eb]) by testsoekris.hotsoft.nl (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t6C8Asub091203; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 10:10:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hans@beastielabs.net) Message-ID: <55A2210E.6050601@beastielabs.net> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 10:10:54 +0200 From: Hans Ottevanger User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: reg@dwf.com CC: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD install. References: <201507120402.t6C427Dg001385@deneb.dwf.com> In-Reply-To: <201507120402.t6C427Dg001385@deneb.dwf.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:11:07 -0000 On 07/12/15 06:02, reg@dwf.com wrote: > > OK, Im confused, or not impressed, choose one. > > I have been trying for several months to put PCBSD 10.1 and FreeBSD 10.1 > on one disk. I finally gave up, and am installing FreeBSD over > the top of my previous PCBSD. sigh. > > After several attempts to put FreeBSD in a partition on the disk > I gave up, and let it have the full 500GB disk. Mumph. > > The install seems to go well, I give it an IP address, hostname, > etc, and get down to the point where you reboot. > > I say yes to the reboot, and instead of rebooting from disk, I > get the bios messages (Im using a mbr) that say its trying to > boot from the ethernet. > > I went back and did this a 2nd time, just to be sure, but got > the same result. > It would be nice to know what happens if you disable booting from the network in the BIOS. Also, it might be helpful if you tell us a bit more about the hardware you are using. > What gives? > I dont remember having this sort of problem when I ran FreeBSD > 20 years ago? > I have seen this happening occasionally the past 20 years, often related to specific hardware and not just with FreeBSD. In most cases it could be fixed. > And why isnt the installer smart enough to install to a partition, > every other OS in existence can do that. > Though I have not attempted to multi-boot for ages, I hear about many people still doing this successfully, even from a single disk. FWIW, the issues I hear about when attempting multi-boot are mostly related to boot managers. Could you be more specific about your issues with the installer? Kind regards, Hans Ottevanger Eindhoven, Netherlands www.beastielabs.net From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jul 12 07:23:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29C3999D91 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 07:23:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gosha-necr@yandex.ru) Received: from forward14o.cmail.yandex.net (forward14o.cmail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a72::1e4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 743B21002 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 07:23:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gosha-necr@yandex.ru) Received: from web24o.yandex.ru (web24o.yandex.ru [95.108.205.124]) by forward14o.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 957A3212B6 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 10:23:40 +0300 (MSK) Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by web24o.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 3D6A964C2642; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 10:23:40 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1436685820; bh=LbH+Dj1yKM+ozXzIk2gdJJxp64c+YqAOAHv3O9bQP2I=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=xCi9P1JxdsYm7oK9lMpRBOwCl+GINffVsolDfPoFq31TUF8scqBxbuiIfP3ax1wAC 61jSzx9H7nX6QycHZedtgK1ld15wINAX+PnJTga6Blx49SQfuUfpuKgNeOybfHWWSb 0jIaVNr5DeAZhNakFZwFRfhgsUJ5FStbGZZ1/Ggs= Received: by web24o.yandex.ru with HTTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 10:23:39 +0300 From: =?koi8-r?B?59XM0cXXIOfP28E=?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Error on make buildworld MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <3632771436685819@web24o.yandex.ru> X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 12:23:39 +0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 12:14:07 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 07:23:46 -0000 R29vZCBkYXkhCgpJIGhhdmUgYSB0ZXN0IGxhcHRvcCB3aXRoIGkzODYtQ1VSUkVOVCBpbnN0YWxs ZWQuCgpBbmQgbm93IEkgaGF2ZSBwcm9ibGVtIHdpdGggYnVpbGR3b3JsZC4gQ2FuIHlvdSBwbGVh c2UgaGVscCBtZSB3aXRoIHRoYXQgcHJvYmxlbT8KCnVuYW1lIC1hCj09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PQpGcmVlQlNEIEJTRC1WQUlPIDExLjAtQ1VSUkVOVCBGcmVlQlNEIDExLjAtQ1VS UkVOVCAjMTogRnJpIEp1bCAxMCAwODoxMjo1MiBNU0sgMjAxNSAgICAgdGVzdEBCU0QtVkFJTzov dXNyL29iai91c3Ivc3JjL3N5cy9WQUlPICBpMzg2CgptYWtlLmNvbmYKPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09CkNQVVRZUEUgPz0gICAgICBwZW50aXVtLW0KQ0ZMQUdTICA9ICAgICAgIC1P cyAtcGlwZSAtbXR1bmU9cGVudGl1bS1tIC1tc3NlIC1tc3NlMgpDT1BURkxBR1M9ICAgICAgLU9z IC1waXBlIC1tdHVuZT1wZW50aXVtLW0gLW1zc2UgLW1zc2UyCgpOT19XRVJST1IgICAgICAgPSAK V0VSUk9SICAgICAgICAgID0gCgpLRVJOQ09ORj0gICAgICAgVkFJTwpNQUxMT0NfUFJPRFVDVElP TiAgICAgICA9IHllcwpXSVRIX1BLR05HICAgICAgPSB5ZXMKCkxPQ0FMSVpFRF9MQU5HICA9IHll cwpERUZBVUxUX1ZFUlNJT05TPSBwZXJsNT01LjIyIHJ1Ynk9Mi4yIHBocD01LjYKCgpzcmMuY29u Zgo9PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0KV0lUSE9VVF9BQ0NUPVlFUwojV0lUSE9VVF9B TUQ9WUVTCldJVEhPVVRfQVNTRVJUX0RFQlVHPVlFUwpXSVRIT1VUX0FUTT1ZRVMKV0lUSE9VVF9B VURJVD1ZRVMKV0lUSE9VVF9BVVRIUEY9WUVTCldJVEhPVVRfQkhZVkU9WUVTCldJVEhPVVRfQkxV RVRPT1RIPVlFUwpXSVRIT1VUX0JTTk1QPVlFUwoKV0lUSE9VVF9DQVBTSUNVTT1ZRVMKV0lUSE9V VF9DQ0Q9WUVTCldJVEhPVVRfQ0RETD1ZRVMKCiNXSVRIT1VUX0NMQU5HPVlFUwojV0lUSE9VVF9D TEFOR19JU19DQz1ZRVMKI1dJVEhfR0NDPVlFUwojV0lUSF9HTlVDWFg9WUVTCgpXSVRIT1VUX0NU TT1ZRVMKV0lUSE9VVF9DVEY9WUVTCldJVEhPVVRfRkRUPVlFUwpXSVRIT1VUX0ZMT1BQWT1ZRVMK V0lUSE9VVF9HQU1FUz1ZRVMKV0lUSE9VVF9HREI9WUVTCldJVEhPVVRfSFRNTD1ZRVMKV0lUSE9V VF9IWVBFUlY9WUVTCgpXSVRIX0lDT05WPXllcwojV0lUSF9JQ09OVl9DT01QQVQ9eWVzCgpXSVRI T1VUX0lORVQ2PVlFUwpXSVRIT1VUX0lORVREPVlFUwojV0lUSE9VVF9JTkZPPVlFUwpXSVRIT1VU X0lQRklMVEVSPVlFUwpXSVRIT1VUX0lQWD1ZRVMKV0lUSE9VVF9JU0NTST1ZRVMKCldJVEhPVVRf S0RVTVA9WUVTCldJVEhPVVRfS0VSQkVST1M9WUVTCldJVEhPVVRfS0VSTkVMX1NZTUJPTFM9WUVT CldJVEhPVVRfS1ZNPVlFUwpXSVRIT1VUX0xQUj1ZRVMKV0lUSE9VVF9NQUlMPVlFUwpXSVRIT1VU X05DUD1ZRVMKV0lUSE9VVF9ORElTPVlFUwpXSVRIT1VUX05FVEdSQVBIPVlFUwpXSVRIT1VUX05J Uz1ZRVMKV0lUSE9VVF9PRkVEPVlFUwpXSVRIT1VUX1BGPVlFUwpXSVRIT1VUX1BNQz1ZRVMKV0lU SE9VVF9RVU9UQVM9WUVTCldJVEhPVVRfUkNNRFM9WUVTCldJVEhPVVRfUkNTPVlFUwpXSVRIT1VU X1NIQVJFRE9DUz1ZRVMKI1dJVEhPVVRfU1NQPVlFUwpXSVRIT1VUX1RGVFA9WUVTCldJVEhPVVRf VU5CT1VORD1ZRVMKI1dJVEhPVVRfVVNCPVlFUwojV0lUSE9VVF9XSVJFTEVTUz1ZRVMKV0lUSE9V VF9aRlM9WUVTCgptYWtlIGJ1aWxkd29ybGQKPT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09CmNj ICAtZnBpYyAtRFBJQyAgLU9zIC1waXBlIC1tdHVuZT1wZW50aXVtLW0gLW1zc2UgLW1zc2UyIC1t YXJjaD1wZW50aXVtLW0gIC1ESEFWRV9DT05GSUdfSCAtRHl5bHZhbD1wY2FweXlsdmFsIC1JL3Vz ci9zcmMvbGliL2xpYnBjYXAgLUkuIC1EX1VfPSJfX2F0dHJpYnV0ZV9fKCh1bnVzZWQpKSIgLURI QVZFX1NOUFJJTlRGIC1ESEFWRV9WU05QUklOVEYgLUkvdXNyL3NyYy9saWIvbGlicGNhcC8uLi8u Li9jb250cmliL2xpYnBjYXAgLUROREVCVUcgLXN0ZD1nbnU5OSAtZnN0YWNrLXByb3RlY3RvciAt V25vLXBvaW50ZXItc2lnbiAtV25vLWVtcHR5LWJvZHkgLVduby1zdHJpbmctcGx1cy1pbnQgLVdu by11bnVzZWQtY29uc3QtdmFyaWFibGUgLVduby10YXV0b2xvZ2ljYWwtY29tcGFyZSAtV25vLXVu dXNlZC12YWx1ZSAtV25vLXBhcmVudGhlc2VzLWVxdWFsaXR5IC1Xbm8tdW51c2VkLWZ1bmN0aW9u IC1Xbm8tZW51bS1jb252ZXJzaW9uIC1Xbm8tdW51c2VkLWxvY2FsLXR5cGVkZWYgLVduby1zd2l0 Y2ggLVduby1zd2l0Y2gtZW51bSAtV25vLWtuci1wcm9tb3RlZC1wYXJhbWV0ZXIgLVduby1wYXJl bnRoZXNlcyAtUXVudXNlZC1hcmd1bWVudHMgLWMgc2Nhbm5lci5jIC1vIHNjYW5uZXIuU28KY2Mg IC1mcGljIC1EUElDICAtT3MgLXBpcGUgLW10dW5lPXBlbnRpdW0tbSAtbXNzZSAtbXNzZTIgLW1h cmNoPXBlbnRpdW0tbSAgLURIQVZFX0NPTkZJR19IIC1EeXlsdmFsPXBjYXB5eWx2YWwgLUkvdXNy L3NyYy9saWIvbGlicGNhcCAtSS4gLURfVV89Il9fYXR0cmlidXRlX18oKHVudXNlZCkpIiAtREhB VkVfU05QUklOVEYgLURIQVZFX1ZTTlBSSU5URiAtSS91c3Ivc3JjL2xpYi9saWJwY2FwLy4uLy4u L2NvbnRyaWIvbGlicGNhcCAtRE5ERUJVRyAtc3RkPWdudTk5IC1mc3RhY2stcHJvdGVjdG9yIC1X bm8tcG9pbnRlci1zaWduIC1Xbm8tZW1wdHktYm9keSAtV25vLXN0cmluZy1wbHVzLWludCAtV25v LXVudXNlZC1jb25zdC12YXJpYWJsZSAtV25vLXRhdXRvbG9naWNhbC1jb21wYXJlIC1Xbm8tdW51 c2VkLXZhbHVlIC1Xbm8tcGFyZW50aGVzZXMtZXF1YWxpdHkgLVduby11bnVzZWQtZnVuY3Rpb24g LVduby1lbnVtLWNvbnZlcnNpb24gLVduby11bnVzZWQtbG9jYWwtdHlwZWRlZiAtV25vLXN3aXRj aCAtV25vLXN3aXRjaC1lbnVtIC1Xbm8ta25yLXByb21vdGVkLXBhcmFtZXRlciAtV25vLXBhcmVu dGhlc2VzIC1RdW51c2VkLWFyZ3VtZW50cyAtYyAvdXNyL3NyYy9saWIvbGlicGNhcC8uLi8uLi9j b250cmliL2xpYnBjYXAvc2YtcGNhcC5jIC1vIHNmLXBjYXAuU28KY2MgIC1mcGljIC1EUElDICAt T3MgLXBpcGUgLW10dW5lPXBlbnRpdW0tbSAtbXNzZSAtbXNzZTIgLW1hcmNoPXBlbnRpdW0tbSAg LURIQVZFX0NPTkZJR19IIC1EeXlsdmFsPXBjYXB5eWx2YWwgLUkvdXNyL3NyYy9saWIvbGlicGNh cCAtSS4gLURfVV89Il9fYXR0cmlidXRlX18oKHVudXNlZCkpIiAtREhBVkVfU05QUklOVEYgLURI QVZFX1ZTTlBSSU5URiAtSS91c3Ivc3JjL2xpYi9saWJwY2FwLy4uLy4uL2NvbnRyaWIvbGlicGNh cCAtRE5ERUJVRyAtc3RkPWdudTk5IC1mc3RhY2stcHJvdGVjdG9yIC1Xbm8tcG9pbnRlci1zaWdu IC1Xbm8tZW1wdHktYm9keSAtV25vLXN0cmluZy1wbHVzLWludCAtV25vLXVudXNlZC1jb25zdC12 YXJpYWJsZSAtV25vLXRhdXRvbG9naWNhbC1jb21wYXJlIC1Xbm8tdW51c2VkLXZhbHVlIC1Xbm8t cGFyZW50aGVzZXMtZXF1YWxpdHkgLVduby11bnVzZWQtZnVuY3Rpb24gLVduby1lbnVtLWNvbnZl cnNpb24gLVduby11bnVzZWQtbG9jYWwtdHlwZWRlZiAtV25vLXN3aXRjaCAtV25vLXN3aXRjaC1l bnVtIC1Xbm8ta25yLXByb21vdGVkLXBhcmFtZXRlciAtV25vLXBhcmVudGhlc2VzIC1RdW51c2Vk LWFyZ3VtZW50cyAtYyAvdXNyL3NyYy9saWIvbGlicGNhcC8uLi8uLi9jb250cmliL2xpYnBjYXAv c2YtcGNhcC1uZy5jIC1vIHNmLXBjYXAtbmcuU28KY2MgIC1mcGljIC1EUElDICAtT3MgLXBpcGUg LW10dW5lPXBlbnRpdW0tbSAtbXNzZSAtbXNzZTIgLW1hcmNoPXBlbnRpdW0tbSAgLURIQVZFX0NP TkZJR19IIC1EeXlsdmFsPXBjYXB5eWx2YWwgLUkvdXNyL3NyYy9saWIvbGlicGNhcCAtSS4gLURf VV89Il9fYXR0cmlidXRlX18oKHVudXNlZCkpIiAtREhBVkVfU05QUklOVEYgLURIQVZFX1ZTTlBS SU5URiAtSS91c3Ivc3JjL2xpYi9saWJwY2FwLy4uLy4uL2NvbnRyaWIvbGlicGNhcCAtRE5ERUJV RyAtc3RkPWdudTk5IC1mc3RhY2stcHJvdGVjdG9yIC1Xbm8tcG9pbnRlci1zaWduIC1Xbm8tZW1w dHktYm9keSAtV25vLXN0cmluZy1wbHVzLWludCAtV25vLXVudXNlZC1jb25zdC12YXJpYWJsZSAt V25vLXRhdXRvbG9naWNhbC1jb21wYXJlIC1Xbm8tdW51c2VkLXZhbHVlIC1Xbm8tcGFyZW50aGVz ZXMtZXF1YWxpdHkgLVduby11bnVzZWQtZnVuY3Rpb24gLVduby1lbnVtLWNvbnZlcnNpb24gLVdu by11bnVzZWQtbG9jYWwtdHlwZWRlZiAtV25vLXN3aXRjaCAtV25vLXN3aXRjaC1lbnVtIC1Xbm8t a25yLXByb21vdGVkLXBhcmFtZXRlciAtV25vLXBhcmVudGhlc2VzIC1RdW51c2VkLWFyZ3VtZW50 cyAtYyB2ZXJzaW9uLmMgLW8gdmVyc2lvbi5TbwpidWlsZGluZyBzaGFyZWQgbGlicmFyeSBsaWJw Y2FwLnNvLjgKY2MgICAtZnN0YWNrLXByb3RlY3RvciAtc2hhcmVkIC1XbCwteCAtV2wsLS1mYXRh bC13YXJuaW5ncyAtV2wsLS13YXJuLXNoYXJlZC10ZXh0cmVsICAtbyBsaWJwY2FwLnNvLjggLVds LC1zb25hbWUsbGlicGNhcC5zby44ICBgTk09J25tJyBsb3JkZXIgZ3JhbW1hci5TbyBwY2FwLWJw Zi5TbyBwY2FwLW5ldG1hcC5TbyBwY2FwLlNvIHBjYXAtY29tbW9uLlNvIGluZXQuU28gZmFkLWdl dGFkLlNvIGdlbmNvZGUuU28gb3B0aW1pemUuU28gbmFtZXRvYWRkci5TbyBldGhlcmVudC5TbyBz YXZlZmlsZS5TbyBicGZfZmlsdGVyLlNvIGJwZl9pbWFnZS5TbyBicGZfZHVtcC5TbyBzY2FubmVy LlNvIHNmLXBjYXAuU28gc2YtcGNhcC1uZy5TbyB2ZXJzaW9uLlNvIHwgdHNvcnQgLXFgIAo9PT0+ IGxpYi9saWJwcm9jIChhbGwpCj09PT4gbGliL2xpYnByb2NzdGF0IChhbGwpCmNjICAgLU9zIC1w aXBlIC1tdHVuZT1wZW50aXVtLW0gLW1zc2UgLW1zc2UyIC1tYXJjaD1wZW50aXVtLW0gIC1JLiAt SS91c3Ivc3JjL2xpYi9saWJwcm9jc3RhdCAtRF9LVk1fVk5PREUgLUROREVCVUcgLXN0ZD1nbnU5 OSAtZnN0YWNrLXByb3RlY3RvciAtV3N5c3RlbS1oZWFkZXJzIC1XYWxsIC1Xbm8tZm9ybWF0LXky ayAtVyAtV25vLXVudXNlZC1wYXJhbWV0ZXIgLVdzdHJpY3QtcHJvdG90eXBlcyAtV21pc3Npbmct cHJvdG90eXBlcyAtV3BvaW50ZXItYXJpdGggLVdyZXR1cm4tdHlwZSAtV2Nhc3QtcXVhbCAtV3dy aXRlLXN0cmluZ3MgLVdzd2l0Y2ggLVdzaGFkb3cgLVd1bnVzZWQtcGFyYW1ldGVyIC1XY2FzdC1h bGlnbiAtV2NoYXItc3Vic2NyaXB0cyAtV2lubGluZSAtV25lc3RlZC1leHRlcm5zIC1XcmVkdW5k YW50LWRlY2xzIC1Xb2xkLXN0eWxlLWRlZmluaXRpb24gLVduby1wb2ludGVyLXNpZ24gLVdtaXNz aW5nLXZhcmlhYmxlLWRlY2xhcmF0aW9ucyAtV3RocmVhZC1zYWZldHkgLVduby1lbXB0eS1ib2R5 IC1Xbm8tc3RyaW5nLXBsdXMtaW50IC1Xbm8tdW51c2VkLWNvbnN0LXZhcmlhYmxlIC1RdW51c2Vk LWFyZ3VtZW50cyAtYyAvdXNyL3NyYy9saWIvbGlicHJvY3N0YXQvY2Q5NjYwLmMgLW8gY2Q5NjYw Lm8KY2MgICAtT3MgLXBpcGUgLW10dW5lPXBlbnRpdW0tbSAtbXNzZSAtbXNzZTIgLW1hcmNoPXBl bnRpdW0tbSAgLUkuIC1JL3Vzci9zcmMvbGliL2xpYnByb2NzdGF0IC1EX0tWTV9WTk9ERSAtRE5E RUJVRyAtc3RkPWdudTk5IC1mc3RhY2stcHJvdGVjdG9yIC1Xc3lzdGVtLWhlYWRlcnMgLVdhbGwg LVduby1mb3JtYXQteTJrIC1XIC1Xbm8tdW51c2VkLXBhcmFtZXRlciAtV3N0cmljdC1wcm90b3R5 cGVzIC1XbWlzc2luZy1wcm90b3R5cGVzIC1XcG9pbnRlci1hcml0aCAtV3JldHVybi10eXBlIC1X Y2FzdC1xdWFsIC1Xd3JpdGUtc3RyaW5ncyAtV3N3aXRjaCAtV3NoYWRvdyAtV3VudXNlZC1wYXJh bWV0ZXIgLVdjYXN0LWFsaWduIC1XY2hhci1zdWJzY3JpcHRzIC1XaW5saW5lIC1XbmVzdGVkLWV4 dGVybnMgLVdyZWR1bmRhbnQtZGVjbHMgLVdvbGQtc3R5bGUtZGVmaW5pdGlvbiAtV25vLXBvaW50 ZXItc2lnbiAtV21pc3NpbmctdmFyaWFibGUtZGVjbGFyYXRpb25zIC1XdGhyZWFkLXNhZmV0eSAt V25vLWVtcHR5LWJvZHkgLVduby1zdHJpbmctcGx1cy1pbnQgLVduby11bnVzZWQtY29uc3QtdmFy aWFibGUgLVF1bnVzZWQtYXJndW1lbnRzIC1jIC91c3Ivc3JjL2xpYi9saWJwcm9jc3RhdC9jb21t b25fa3ZtLmMgLW8gY29tbW9uX2t2bS5vCmNjICAgLU9zIC1waXBlIC1tdHVuZT1wZW50aXVtLW0g LW1zc2UgLW1zc2UyIC1tYXJjaD1wZW50aXVtLW0gIC1JLiAtSS91c3Ivc3JjL2xpYi9saWJwcm9j c3RhdCAtRF9LVk1fVk5PREUgLUROREVCVUcgLXN0ZD1nbnU5OSAtZnN0YWNrLXByb3RlY3RvciAt V3N5c3RlbS1oZWFkZXJzIC1XYWxsIC1Xbm8tZm9ybWF0LXkyayAtVyAtV25vLXVudXNlZC1wYXJh bWV0ZXIgLVdzdHJpY3QtcHJvdG90eXBlcyAtV21pc3NpbmctcHJvdG90eXBlcyAtV3BvaW50ZXIt YXJpdGggLVdyZXR1cm4tdHlwZSAtV2Nhc3QtcXVhbCAtV3dyaXRlLXN0cmluZ3MgLVdzd2l0Y2gg LVdzaGFkb3cgLVd1bnVzZWQtcGFyYW1ldGVyIC1XY2FzdC1hbGlnbiAtV2NoYXItc3Vic2NyaXB0 cyAtV2lubGluZSAtV25lc3RlZC1leHRlcm5zIC1XcmVkdW5kYW50LWRlY2xzIC1Xb2xkLXN0eWxl LWRlZmluaXRpb24gLVduby1wb2ludGVyLXNpZ24gLVdtaXNzaW5nLXZhcmlhYmxlLWRlY2xhcmF0 aW9ucyAtV3RocmVhZC1zYWZldHkgLVduby1lbXB0eS1ib2R5IC1Xbm8tc3RyaW5nLXBsdXMtaW50 IC1Xbm8tdW51c2VkLWNvbnN0LXZhcmlhYmxlIC1RdW51c2VkLWFyZ3VtZW50cyAtYyAvdXNyL3Ny Yy9saWIvbGlicHJvY3N0YXQvY29yZS5jIC1vIGNvcmUubwpjYyAgIC1PcyAtcGlwZSAtbXR1bmU9 cGVudGl1bS1tIC1tc3NlIC1tc3NlMiAtbWFyY2g9cGVudGl1bS1tICAtSS4gLUkvdXNyL3NyYy9s aWIvbGlicHJvY3N0YXQgLURfS1ZNX1ZOT0RFIC1ETkRFQlVHIC1zdGQ9Z251OTkgLWZzdGFjay1w cm90ZWN0b3IgLVdzeXN0ZW0taGVhZGVycyAtV2FsbCAtV25vLWZvcm1hdC15MmsgLVcgLVduby11 bnVzZWQtcGFyYW1ldGVyIC1Xc3RyaWN0LXByb3RvdHlwZXMgLVdtaXNzaW5nLXByb3RvdHlwZXMg LVdwb2ludGVyLWFyaXRoIC1XcmV0dXJuLXR5cGUgLVdjYXN0LXF1YWwgLVd3cml0ZS1zdHJpbmdz IC1Xc3dpdGNoIC1Xc2hhZG93IC1XdW51c2VkLXBhcmFtZXRlciAtV2Nhc3QtYWxpZ24gLVdjaGFy LXN1YnNjcmlwdHMgLVdpbmxpbmUgLVduZXN0ZWQtZXh0ZXJucyAtV3JlZHVuZGFudC1kZWNscyAt V29sZC1zdHlsZS1kZWZpbml0aW9uIC1Xbm8tcG9pbnRlci1zaWduIC1XbWlzc2luZy12YXJpYWJs ZS1kZWNsYXJhdGlvbnMgLVd0aHJlYWQtc2FmZXR5IC1Xbm8tZW1wdHktYm9keSAtV25vLXN0cmlu Zy1wbHVzLWludCAtV25vLXVudXNlZC1jb25zdC12YXJpYWJsZSAtUXVudXNlZC1hcmd1bWVudHMg LWMgL3Vzci9zcmMvbGliL2xpYnByb2NzdGF0L2xpYnByb2NzdGF0LmMgLW8gbGlicHJvY3N0YXQu bwovdXNyL3NyYy9saWIvbGlicHJvY3N0YXQvbGlicHJvY3N0YXQuYzo4MjM6Mjogd2FybmluZzog dmFyaWFibGUgJ2ZpbGVzJyBpcyB1c2VkIHVuaW5pdGlhbGl6ZWQgd2hlbmV2ZXIgc3dpdGNoIGRl ZmF1bHQgaXMgdGFrZW4gWy1Xc29tZXRpbWVzLXVuaW5pdGlhbGl6ZWRdCiAgICAgICAgZGVmYXVs dDoKICAgICAgICBefn5+fn5+Ci91c3Ivc3JjL2xpYi9saWJwcm9jc3RhdC9saWJwcm9jc3RhdC5j OjgyNjo2OiBub3RlOiB1bmluaXRpYWxpemVkIHVzZSBvY2N1cnMgaGVyZQogICAgICAgIGlmIChm aWxlcyA9PSBOVUxMICYmIGVycm5vICE9IEVQRVJNKSB7CiAgICAgICAgICAgIF5+fn5+Ci91c3Iv c3JjL2xpYi9saWJwcm9jc3RhdC9saWJwcm9jc3RhdC5jOjgwMjozMjogbm90ZTogaW5pdGlhbGl6 ZSB0aGUgdmFyaWFibGUgJ2ZpbGVzJyB0byBzaWxlbmNlIHRoaXMgd2FybmluZwogICAgICAgIHN0 cnVjdCBraW5mb19maWxlICpraWYsICpmaWxlczsKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICBeCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgID0gTlVM TApTdGFjayBkdW1wOgowLiAgICAgIFByb2dyYW0gYXJndW1lbnRzOiAvdXNyL29iai91c3Ivc3Jj L3RtcC91c3IvYmluL2NjIC1jYzEgLXRyaXBsZSBpMzg2LXVua25vd24tZnJlZWJzZDExLjAgLWVt aXQtb2JqIC1kaXNhYmxlLWZyZWUgLWRpc2FibGUtbGx2bS12ZXJpZmllciAtbWFpbi1maWxlLW5h bWUgbGlicHJvY3N0YXQuYyAtbXJlbG9jYXRpb24tbW9kZWwgc3RhdGljIC1tdGhyZWFkLW1vZGVs IHBvc2l4IC1tZGlzYWJsZS1mcC1lbGltIC1tYXNtLXZlcmJvc2UgLW1jb25zdHJ1Y3Rvci1hbGlh c2VzIC10YXJnZXQtY3B1IHBlbnRpdW0tbSAtdGFyZ2V0LWZlYXR1cmUgK3NzZSAtdGFyZ2V0LWZl YXR1cmUgK3NzZTIgLWR3YXJmLWNvbHVtbi1pbmZvIC1jb3ZlcmFnZS1maWxlIC91c3Ivb2JqL3Vz ci9zcmMvbGliL2xpYnByb2NzdGF0L2xpYnByb2NzdGF0Lm8gLXJlc291cmNlLWRpciAvdXNyL29i ai91c3Ivc3JjL3RtcC91c3IvYmluLy4uL2xpYi9jbGFuZy8zLjYuMSAtRCBfS1ZNX1ZOT0RFIC1E IE5ERUJVRyAtSSAuIC1JIC91c3Ivc3JjL2xpYi9saWJwcm9jc3RhdCAtaXN5c3Jvb3QgL3Vzci9v YmovdXNyL3NyYy90bXAgLU9zIC1Xc3lzdGVtLWhlYWRlcnMgLVdhbGwgLVduby1mb3JtYXQteTJr IC1XIC1Xbm8tdW51c2VkLXBhcmFtZXRlciAtV3N0cmljdC1wcm90b3R5cGVzIC1XbWlzc2luZy1w cm90b3R5cGVzIC1XcG9pbnRlci1hcml0aCAtV3JldHVybi10eXBlIC1XY2FzdC1xdWFsIC1Xd3Jp dGUtc3RyaW5ncyAtV3N3aXRjaCAtV3NoYWRvdyAtV3VudXNlZC1wYXJhbWV0ZXIgLVdjYXN0LWFs aWduIC1XY2hhci1zdWJzY3JpcHRzIC1XaW5saW5lIC1XbmVzdGVkLWV4dGVybnMgLVdyZWR1bmRh bnQtZGVjbHMgLVdvbGQtc3R5bGUtZGVmaW5pdGlvbiAtV25vLXBvaW50ZXItc2lnbiAtV21pc3Np bmctdmFyaWFibGUtZGVjbGFyYXRpb25zIC1XdGhyZWFkLXNhZmV0eSAtV25vLWVtcHR5LWJvZHkg LVduby1zdHJpbmctcGx1cy1pbnQgLVduby11bnVzZWQtY29uc3QtdmFyaWFibGUgLXN0ZD1nbnU5 OSAtZmNvbnN0LXN0cmluZ3MgLWZkZWJ1Zy1jb21waWxhdGlvbi1kaXIgL3Vzci9vYmovdXNyL3Ny Yy9saWIvbGlicHJvY3N0YXQgLWZlcnJvci1saW1pdCAxOSAtZm1lc3NhZ2UtbGVuZ3RoIDI3MSAt c3RhY2stcHJvdGVjdG9yIDEgLW1zdGFja3JlYWxpZ24gLWZvYmpjLXJ1bnRpbWU9Z251c3RlcCAt ZmRpYWdub3N0aWNzLXNob3ctb3B0aW9uIC1mY29sb3ItZGlhZ25vc3RpY3MgLXZlY3Rvcml6ZS1s b29wcyAtdmVjdG9yaXplLXNscCAtbyBsaWJwcm9jc3RhdC5vIC14IGMgL3Vzci9zcmMvbGliL2xp YnByb2NzdGF0L2xpYnByb2NzdGF0LmMgCjEuICAgICAgPGVvZj4gcGFyc2VyIGF0IGVuZCBvZiBm aWxlCjIuICAgICAgUGVyLW1vZHVsZSBvcHRpbWl6YXRpb24gcGFzc2VzCjMuICAgICAgUnVubmlu ZyBwYXNzICdDYWxsR3JhcGggUGFzcyBNYW5hZ2VyJyBvbiBtb2R1bGUgJy91c3Ivc3JjL2xpYi9s aWJwcm9jc3RhdC9saWJwcm9jc3RhdC5jJy4KNC4gICAgICBSdW5uaW5nIHBhc3MgJ0p1bXAgVGhy ZWFkaW5nJyBvbiBmdW5jdGlvbiAnQHByb2NzdGF0X2dldGZpbGVzX3N5c2N0bCcKY2M6IGVycm9y OiB1bmFibGUgdG8gZXhlY3V0ZSBjb21tYW5kOiBTZWdtZW50YXRpb24gZmF1bHQgKGNvcmUgZHVt cGVkKQpjYzogZXJyb3I6IGNsYW5nIGZyb250ZW5kIGNvbW1hbmQgZmFpbGVkIGR1ZSB0byBzaWdu YWwgKHVzZSAtdiB0byBzZWUgaW52b2NhdGlvbikKRnJlZUJTRCBjbGFuZyB2ZXJzaW9uIDMuNi4x ICh0YWdzL1JFTEVBU0VfMzYxL2ZpbmFsIDIzNzc1NSkgMjAxNTA1MjUKVGFyZ2V0OiBpMzg2LXVu a25vd24tZnJlZWJzZDExLjAKVGhyZWFkIG1vZGVsOiBwb3NpeApjYzogbm90ZTogZGlhZ25vc3Rp YyBtc2c6IFBMRUFTRSBzdWJtaXQgYSBidWcgcmVwb3J0IHRvIGh0dHBzOi8vYnVncy5mcmVlYnNk Lm9yZy9zdWJtaXQvIGFuZCBpbmNsdWRlIHRoZSBjcmFzaCBiYWNrdHJhY2UsIHByZXByb2Nlc3Nl ZCBzb3VyY2UsIGFuZCBhc3NvY2lhdGVkIHJ1biBzY3JpcHQuCmNjOiBub3RlOiBkaWFnbm9zdGlj IG1zZzogCioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqCgpQTEVBU0UgQVRUQUNIIFRIRSBGT0xMT1dJTkcg RklMRVMgVE8gVEhFIEJVRyBSRVBPUlQ6ClByZXByb2Nlc3NlZCBzb3VyY2UocykgYW5kIGFzc29j aWF0ZWQgcnVuIHNjcmlwdChzKSBhcmUgbG9jYXRlZCBhdDoKY2M6IG5vdGU6IGRpYWdub3N0aWMg bXNnOiAvdG1wL2xpYnByb2NzdGF0LTYxNTBlNi5jCmNjOiBub3RlOiBkaWFnbm9zdGljIG1zZzog L3RtcC9saWJwcm9jc3RhdC02MTUwZTYuc2gKY2M6IG5vdGU6IGRpYWdub3N0aWMgbXNnOiAKCioq KioqKioqKioqKioqKioqKioqCioqKiBFcnJvciBjb2RlIDI1NAoKU3RvcC4KbWFrZVs1XTogc3Rv cHBlZCBpbiAvdXNyL3NyYy9saWIvbGlicHJvY3N0YXQKKioqIEVycm9yIGNvZGUgMQoKU3RvcC4K bWFrZVs0XTogc3RvcHBlZCBpbiAvdXNyL3NyYy9saWIKKioqIEVycm9yIGNvZGUgMQoKU3RvcC4K bWFrZVszXTogc3RvcHBlZCBpbiAvdXNyL3NyYwoqKiogRXJyb3IgY29kZSAxCgpTdG9wLgptYWtl WzJdOiBzdG9wcGVkIGluIC91c3Ivc3JjCioqKiBFcnJvciBjb2RlIDEKClN0b3AuCm1ha2VbMV06 IHN0b3BwZWQgaW4gL3Vzci9zcmMKKioqIEVycm9yIGNvZGUgMQoKU3RvcC4KbWFrZTogc3RvcHBl ZCBpbiAvdXNyL3NyYwpyb290QEJTRC1WQUlPOi91c3Ivc3JjICMgCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jul 12 12:33:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38F3F99978A for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 12:33:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from bede.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org", Issuer "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2E662FD5 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 12:33:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t6CCERxb033211; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 13:14:27 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <55A25A23.800@qeng-ho.org> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 13:14:27 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Quartz , Aleksandr Miroslav CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS: zdev names don't match devices References: <55A03DB2.3020407@sneakertech.com> In-Reply-To: <55A03DB2.3020407@sneakertech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 12:33:55 -0000 On 10/07/2015 22:48, Quartz wrote: >> Did I screw >> up my zfs setup? > > No. This is a quirk of the way the 10.x installer/ZFS works. There are a > handful of different ways to identify a disk on FreeBSD besides the > device ID, including UUIDs and gpt labels and such. Device IDs will > change if you ever add/remove/reorder the physical drives, so the > installer uses the other methods to be safer. I don't know why it uses a > mix instead of doing the same thing for each drive though. I've been bitten by the fact that disk partitions can have several names before. Depending on the exact set up the same partition could be called some or all of /dev/ada0p3, /dev/gpt/$gptlabel, /dev/gptid/$uuid, /dev/diskid/DISK-${disklabel}p3 or /dev/ufs/$ufslabel. ZFS pool importing seems to pretty much randomise which forms get used. Personally I prefer to use partition names of the form /dev/gpt/xx-label where xx- is a per machine and disk prefix so I can move disks between machines without confusion in case of problems. I haven't actually got round to trying this yet, but the appearance the various forms of partition name under /dev seem to be controlled by the kern.geom.label.xxx.enable sysctls. Thus if you wish to see the /dev/gpt forms and not have ZFS grab some alternate name, try putting kern.geom.label.gptid.enable=0 kern.geom.label.disk_ident.enable=0 into /boot/loader.conf -- Those who do not learn from computing history are doomed to GOTO 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jul 12 13:30:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236429991AE for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 13:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from romapera15@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x235.google.com (mail-la0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FAFE1B2B for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 13:30:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from romapera15@gmail.com) Received: by laar3 with SMTP id r3so288300005laa.0 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:30:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=PsTU540Stqqfgxf9sGHj2m0Ljde21xtN/kbTw2S/zXw=; b=Hgz8PBvFwdA5Aub2x+lgZWJcfbhuScytT1B0bu2PI12vUaXVgd0RNXj0eLSKXERBqo EluqT87uNVQdsOT4wNzGJS61NPv/cHt6W54py8gKEK/u3d8Ex/ew4QI9J/snaJHVz0jw QvpjmnpqgbEKGvonen1cK2qDDuCf+xc5U0LL1FONDkmp6uzZtq2BsdC+mV0McrWFTzyU MnJMSIbCaCeQJ+4BjCGNZa8afA1YEPyG2/fZ3wfAFGisGSTDuLfTG5JgYV0vSydKYmMr 8wkH7U+pIRVMAsK68czSdgp16OGdUGFREVckVV5/PR8jtcz5CrKVGMKK9qr8xjyZiHnn xHVg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.87.131 with SMTP id ay3mr2881000lab.27.1436707822718; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:30:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.205.209 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:30:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 10:30:22 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [OFF-TOPIC] The that are IXP of Ashburn in Virginia, LAX or WU Seattle and what are its importance? From: =?UTF-8?Q?fran=C3=A7ai_s?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 13:30:25 -0000 *The that are IXP of Ashburn in Commonwealth of Virginia, *LAX or WU Seattle and what are its importance? 2015-07-11 20:03 GMT-03:00 fran=C3=A7ai s : > The that are IXP of Ashburn in Virginia, LAX or WU Seattle and what are > its importance? > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jul 12 14:10:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB46999876 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:10:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@rvijay.me) Received: from mail11.rvijay.me (mail11.rvijay.me [107.6.164.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27271C58 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:10:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@rvijay.me) Received: from mail10.rvijay.me (mail10.rvijay.me [89.233.108.53]) by mail11.rvijay.me (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E131E61163 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:38:46 +0530 (IST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail10.rvijay.me (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C3D241AB for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:08:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=rvijay.me; h= content-type:content-type:subject:subject:to:mime-version :user-agent:from:from:date:date:message-id; s=20130919; t= 1436710120; x=1437574121; bh=jFeDZIzgG3V9t//HIl1nzEgydj9B6wxqsLy nLuTtgpo=; b=dpiSRZ33NfeeTtpavvfXvUC08q07Tzy6+97ZxRC12abeeBmrbOV 9gGg9Gv3kEUiod3+bcD4nD5Q4mRflDI+7F2ctKPR5rdmi4zNWMEi7og8tpbnNvAI 8VORUQ2b+OBvcz60yekK0sGyE06d6chgPse0U7/h9dVjxC8GLSoA3hao= Received: from mail10.rvijay.me ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail10.rvijay.me [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id U42JJF3m9CqQ for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:08:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Vijays-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [49.207.184.142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail10.rvijay.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8C31D2405F for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:08:39 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <55A274E5.50903@rvijay.me> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 19:38:37 +0530 From: Vijay Rajah User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD questions Subject: Openssl + Via Padlock Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:10:33 -0000 Hello List, I have a system with VIA chipset. I want to compile openssl with padlock support. I'm getting "Illegal instruction" error, when I try to use the sha256library root@my-host:~ # dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=512 | /usr/local/bin/openssl sha256 Illegal instruction (core dumped) This is a dedicated server. This is a fresh install of FreeBSD 10.1. I installed Openssl from ports Here are the details.. root@my-host:~ # uname -a FreeBSD my-host 10.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 root@my-host:~ # freebsd-version 10.1-RELEASE-p14 root@my-host:~ # /usr/local/bin/openssl version OpenSSL 1.0.2d 9 Jul 2015 root@my-host:~ # /usr/local/bin/openssl engine (dynamic) Dynamic engine loading support (padlock) VIA PadLock: RNG ACE2 PHE NANO root@my-host:~ # dmesg | grep -i via CPU: VIA Nano processor U2250 (1.6GHz Capable) (1596.04-MHz K8-class CPU) VIA Padlock Features=0x70dcc . . . root@my-host:~ # kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 10 0xffffffff80200000 1756638 kernel 2 1 0xffffffff81a11000 26c7 pflog.ko 3 1 0xffffffff81a14000 32339 pf.ko 4 1 0xffffffff81a47000 2b1d padlock.ko 5 1 0xffffffff81a4a000 1f565 crypto.ko Examining the core file with GDB give me the following # gdb /usr/local/bin/openssl openssl.core . . (gdb) bt #0 0x00000008014f2c7e in padlock_sha256_update () from /usr/local/lib/engines/libpadlock.so #1 0x0000000800c3499f in md_read () from /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 #2 0x0000000800c1c724 in BIO_read () from /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 #3 0x00000000004228d0 in do_fp () #4 0x0000000000422683 in dgst_main () #5 0x000000000041b77d in do_cmd () #6 0x000000000041b606 in main () (gdb) disassemble 0x00000008014f2c7e . . . 0x00000008014f2c7b : mov %rdx,%rcx *0x00000008014f2c7e : xsha256 * 0x00000008014f2c81 : shl $0x6,%rdx . . . Hence, it appears that the openssl command fails at the "xsha256" instruction. This appears to be VIA chip's instruction?? Any ideas as to why this is failing? -Thanks in advance Vijay From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jul 12 14:11:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FA0E99997F for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:11:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@buildingonline.com) Received: from alisocreek.buildingonline.net (alisocreek.buildingonline.net [204.109.62.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122261E6C for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:11:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@buildingonline.com) Received: by alisocreek.buildingonline.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id 20675BCFFF2; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 07:04:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on alisocreek.buildingonline.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from Brady.local (busarow2 [69.51.79.5]) (Authenticated sender: dan@dpcsys.com) by alisocreek.buildingonline.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3D33CBCA112 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 07:04:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55A273D9.5080108@buildingonline.com> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 08:04:09 -0600 From: Dan Busarow Organization: BuildingOnline.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: freebsd-update and whatis References: <20150712130057.45FA6BCFE10@alisocreek.buildingonline.net> In-Reply-To: <20150712130057.45FA6BCFE10@alisocreek.buildingonline.net> X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <20150712130057.45FA6BCFE10@alisocreek.buildingonline.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:11:43 -0000 I have 9 servers running 9.3-RELEASE p19 They are all pretty much identical at the / and /usr level with differences in /usr/local On two of these servers, freebsd-update keeps updating /usr/share/man/whatis after periodic weekly updates whatis The other 7 don't care. I know I can add /usr/share/man/whatis to freebsd-update.com IgnorePaths But.. what I'd really like to know is what may have triggered this behavior only on two out of 9 servers? Thanks, Dan -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: alisocreek.buildingonline.net security updates Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:00:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Charlie Root To: root@buildingonline.net Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. Fetching metadata signature for 9.3-RELEASE from update.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. The following files will be updated as part of updating to 9.3-RELEASE-p19: /usr/share/man/whatis From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jul 12 20:16:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCA4499BB1B for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 20:16:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8937C12C0 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 20:16:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-114.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 689D93CD36; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 22:16:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t6CKGfmq002107; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 22:16:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 22:16:41 +0200 From: Polytropon To: reg@dwf.com Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD install. Message-Id: <20150712221641.69f81f00.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <201507120402.t6C427Dg001385@deneb.dwf.com> References: <201507120402.t6C427Dg001385@deneb.dwf.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 20:16:47 -0000 On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 22:02:07 -0600, reg@dwf.com wrote: > I have been trying for several months to put PCBSD 10.1 and FreeBSD 10.1 > on one disk. I finally gave up, and am installing FreeBSD over > the top of my previous PCBSD. sigh. It should be no big problem to allocate two slices, put FreeBSD in one, PC-BSD in the other, and add the FreeBSD boot manager to select which OS to boot. This has been possible for decades now, and it isn't "special". > After several attempts to put FreeBSD in a partition on the disk > I gave up, and let it have the full 500GB disk. Mumph. Did you use MBR or GPT partitioning? As far as I remember, the GPT approach doesn't support boot manager use yet. > The install seems to go well, I give it an IP address, hostname, > etc, and get down to the point where you reboot. > > I say yes to the reboot, and instead of rebooting from disk, I > get the bios messages (Im using a mbr) that say its trying to > boot from the ethernet. This indicates that you've missed to add a boot record for the disk, so obviously the BIOS doesn't find anything that screams "Here! Here! I'm bootable!" :-) > I went back and did this a 2nd time, just to be sure, but got > the same result. So you missed the boot part a second time. > What gives? > I dont remember having this sort of problem when I ran FreeBSD > 20 years ago? Yes, this kind of problems seems to happen now that many parts of FreeBSD are in a "transition phase"... :-( > And why isnt the installer smart enough to install to a partition, > every other OS in existence can do that. Depends on how "every other OS in existence" defines what "partition" means. :-) But you're right - what you plan to do is possible with MBR slices (commonly called "DOS primary partitions"). Let's say you have 500 GB and want to use it as 50/50. Then you prepare the disk as follows: ada0 <- for boot manager ada0s1 <- for FreeBSD ada0s2 <- for PC-BSD You can do this either with gpart (using MBR partitioning) or with fdisk, the "old" tool for dealing with MBR. Use boot0cfg to add the boot manager. The slices can be formatted to carry _one_ file system (no further subpartitioning a la disklabel), it has to be an 'a' partition (bootable partition): ada0s1a ada0s2a Use bsdlabel to create it, spanning the whole disk size. Use newfs to initialize it, or leave that task to the installers of FreeBSD and PC-BSD. Result: The BIOS will now see ada0 bootable. It will continue to transfer control to the boot manager. The boot manager then will see two slices carrying a bootable file system each, and will let you decide which one to boot. As soon as control is transfered to one of the slices, the kernel loader will load the kernel, mount the root file system, and continue booting the OS. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jul 12 21:44:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6E099B9B8 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:44:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dereks@lifeofadishwasher.com) Received: from mail-qg0-x22f.google.com (mail-qg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 365D010A0 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:44:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dereks@lifeofadishwasher.com) Received: by qgef3 with SMTP id f3so99440770qge.0 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:44:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifeofadishwasher.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=50MKZQSmdcKCS1Ay9ID+PtmE9eFDXbAqhzOQa8s5yrk=; b=H2vhcu2WsUHg5fgk3X7aJvZ749Ed4LSmwDj3q1h2k6xmVm903EEdVetpFeBqpvDZFk Wxwr/tW+hkw7iOhB//DuD20Ssv2D/6pnZbBZjU4aXkARS2y5xEdckpwY1FxwMddgnCou /lfChg7sG/YWaK7gCE+zM02FavlL6uetJHJic= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=50MKZQSmdcKCS1Ay9ID+PtmE9eFDXbAqhzOQa8s5yrk=; b=R1S1OLluoUa5UJO3N/SUF2Uqpji3f2Uw7oGgb56b2EBxc7GYvqrzTMiOYsqT8misg+ XWtpb32mE5uwpfBJfIPliB7YBAFHrRkWiKuLC5UiNRc0Hyd6F/IZBprgQr/MVPoyyhOD 09PSP1bh+5VUMB7hwKTjP0igBBYkq6Eu1o0r4opGwZTtZ7t6pDr787wnKZhNwvpG1HYk b7duRlmvCGSVkee2cvRQ4NAvMp7l6bx7YcPu0eRx6tSAYr4nqjWnNI+xVUIXPA9IyXBf DPBohzpU0aUTYYn7bZ8yle4ZYf/3o9sC+zgh98kWyYHXmaILtefw0vsV+VLDf14dtn+f LUdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnQ2x+7ZoiHFd+yWktR55MVplQrrATyIpRC7vgwbn6y+LjLi7Ch8xg3Gslnvd94FJlK5ql+ X-Received: by 10.140.233.140 with SMTP id e134mr52076575qhc.63.1436737482084; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:44:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lifeofadishwasher.com (c-71-206-246-125.hsd1.pa.comcast.net. [71.206.246.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 20sm1960870qkp.39.2015.07.12.14.44.39 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 12 Jul 2015 14:44:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lifeofadishwasher.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 12 Jul 2015 17:44:39 -0400 Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 17:44:39 -0400 From: Derek Schrock To: Dan Busarow Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update and whatis Message-ID: <20150712214439.GA25794@ircbsd> References: <20150712130057.45FA6BCFE10@alisocreek.buildingonline.net> <55A273D9.5080108@buildingonline.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55A273D9.5080108@buildingonline.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:44:43 -0000 Ran in the same problem and if anyone disagrees please correct me this is all based off my observations. Your whatis database file is being rebuilt on a weekly basis and your system has some third party or orphaned base files. /etc/periodic/weekly/320.whatis is ran on a weekly basis: $ fgrep weekly /etc/crontab # Perform daily/weekly/monthly maintenance. 15 4 * * 6 root periodic weekly You can see this by running freebsd-update, 320.whatis, then freebsd-update again: # freebsd-update fetch Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 10.1-RELEASE from update5.freebsd.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. The following files will be updated as part of updating to 10.1-RELEASE-p14: /usr/share/man/whatis # freebsd-update install Installing updates... done. # freebsd-update fetch Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 10.1-RELEASE from update5.freebsd.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. No updates needed to update system to 10.1-RELEASE-p14. # /etc/periodic/weekly/320.whatis Rebuilding whatis database: # freebsd-update fetch Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 10.1-RELEASE from update6.freebsd.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. The following files will be updated as part of updating to 10.1-RELEASE-p14: /usr/share/man/whatis But why is your base not in sync with the environment that builds the freebsd-update binaries? When you run freebsd-update there's a possibility that between updates (more likely between major updates) there's a chance old files were removed. These could be libs, include, binaries, man pages (in this case). ex: Upgrade from 9.X to 10.X pkg_* was removed including the binaries, support, and man files among other things that changed in 9->10. I haven't tested this yet however freebsd-update.conf does have an option: AllowDelete The single parameter following this keyword must be ``yes'' or ``no'' and specifies whether freebsd-update is allowed to delete files, directories, and symlinks as part of updates downloaded. I don't know if this cleans the no older used/orphaned files it doesn't appear to retroactively clean up if you've had it off. I believe another option is to use /usr/src/Makefile if you have /usr/src (or a checked out source tree). I don't know if using github.com/freebsd/freebsd/ releng/10.1 or stable/10 branch is correct. Using a system installed /usr/src that's updated via freebsd-update might be the correct way to go. ex: $ fgrep delete-old Makefile # delete-old - Delete obsolete directories/files. # delete-old-dirs - Delete obsolete directories. # delete-old-files - Delete obsolete files. # delete-old-libs - Delete obsolete libraries. # 9. `make delete-old' # 11. `make delete-old-libs' (in case no 3rd party program uses them # anymore) delete-old delete-old-dirs delete-old-files delete-old-libs \ # git branch master releng/10.1 * stable/10 # make delete-old >>> Removing old files (only deletes safe to delete libs) remove /usr/share/man/man9/NDHASGIANT.9.gz? ..... I would like to know the best way to clean up old/orphaned base files. - freebsd-update (but then how do you clean up from previous updates when you had AllowDelete set to the default value no?). - /usr/src/Makefile # make -C /usr/src/ delete-old # delete-old{,-dirs,-files,-libs) I believe the only risk here is if you delete a lib that's still being used by a third party utility - or some other method I didn't mention. Parsing INDEX files from freebsd-update server might be an option however very risky. Side note: It appears there was once a handbook article for delete-old and delete-old-{dirs,files,libs} however it was removed. Should it return? On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 08:04:09AM -0600, Dan Busarow wrote: > I have 9 servers running 9.3-RELEASE p19 > > They are all pretty much identical at the / and /usr level with > differences in /usr/local > > On two of these servers, freebsd-update keeps updating > /usr/share/man/whatis after periodic weekly updates whatis > > The other 7 don't care. > > I know I can add /usr/share/man/whatis to freebsd-update.com IgnorePaths > > But.. what I'd really like to know is what may have triggered this > behavior only on two out of 9 servers? > > Thanks, > Dan > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: alisocreek.buildingonline.net security updates > Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:00:57 -0700 (PDT) > From: Charlie Root > To: root@buildingonline.net > > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. > Fetching metadata signature for 9.3-RELEASE from update.FreeBSD.org... done. > Fetching metadata index... done. > Inspecting system... done. > Preparing to download files... done. > > The following files will be updated as part of updating to 9.3-RELEASE-p19: > /usr/share/man/whatis > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 13 00:27:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E713199980B for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:27:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7051029CF for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:27:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t6D0RfVi038343 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 12 Jul 2015 18:27:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t6D0ReXK038340; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 18:27:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 18:27:40 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Polytropon cc: reg@dwf.com, FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD install. In-Reply-To: <20150712221641.69f81f00.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: References: <201507120402.t6C427Dg001385@deneb.dwf.com> <20150712221641.69f81f00.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 12 Jul 2015 18:27:41 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:27:55 -0000 On Sun, 12 Jul 2015, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 22:02:07 -0600, reg@dwf.com wrote: >> I have been trying for several months to put PCBSD 10.1 and FreeBSD 10.1 >> on one disk. I finally gave up, and am installing FreeBSD over >> the top of my previous PCBSD. sigh. > > It should be no big problem to allocate two slices, put > FreeBSD in one, PC-BSD in the other, and add the FreeBSD > boot manager to select which OS to boot. This has been > possible for decades now, and it isn't "special". > > > >> After several attempts to put FreeBSD in a partition on the disk >> I gave up, and let it have the full 500GB disk. Mumph. > > Did you use MBR or GPT partitioning? As far as I remember, > the GPT approach doesn't support boot manager use yet. Grub can do that. Doing it from the installer will require command-line use and familiarity with the tools: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/gpt-multiboot.49055/ Instead of dual-booting, I recommend using VM software. VirtualBox is free, does not require any messing about with existing partitions, and allows the VM client to run at the same time as the host. >> And why isnt the installer smart enough to install to a partition, >> every other OS in existence can do that. > > Depends on how "every other OS in existence" defines what "partition" > means. :-) I'm fairly sure that the installer will install to a partition if one is available or created with the partitioning screen. It will still be up to the user to install boot0, which of course only works with MBR primary partitions. The four-partition limit of MBR often means that the ugly partition-with-a-partition format is required: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/creating-a-traditional-mbr-layout-with-bsdinstall.45072/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 13 01:07:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C262999E12 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 01:07:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C28E1C09 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 01:07:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-114.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 155E43CF00; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 03:07:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t6D179no002190; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 03:07:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 03:07:09 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Warren Block Cc: reg@dwf.com, FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: FreeBSD install. Message-Id: <20150713030709.e8888fe3.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <201507120402.t6C427Dg001385@deneb.dwf.com> <20150712221641.69f81f00.freebsd@edvax.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 01:07:22 -0000 On Sun, 12 Jul 2015 18:27:40 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 12 Jul 2015, Polytropon wrote: > > > On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 22:02:07 -0600, reg@dwf.com wrote: > >> I have been trying for several months to put PCBSD 10.1 and FreeBSD 10.1 > >> on one disk. I finally gave up, and am installing FreeBSD over > >> the top of my previous PCBSD. sigh. > > > > It should be no big problem to allocate two slices, put > > FreeBSD in one, PC-BSD in the other, and add the FreeBSD > > boot manager to select which OS to boot. This has been > > possible for decades now, and it isn't "special". > > > > > > > >> After several attempts to put FreeBSD in a partition on the disk > >> I gave up, and let it have the full 500GB disk. Mumph. > > > > Did you use MBR or GPT partitioning? As far as I remember, > > the GPT approach doesn't support boot manager use yet. > > Grub can do that. Doing it from the installer will require command-line > use and familiarity with the tools: > https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/gpt-multiboot.49055/ Yes, Grub is a possible solution. I just wanted to point out that our _native_ boot manager isn't yet able to operate on GPT, but will work fine with MBR. > >> And why isnt the installer smart enough to install to a partition, > >> every other OS in existence can do that. > > > > Depends on how "every other OS in existence" defines what "partition" > > means. :-) > > I'm fairly sure that the installer will install to a partition if one is > available or created with the partitioning screen. It will still be up > to the user to install boot0, which of course only works with MBR > primary partitions. The encountered problem is that even if a system has been properly installed, it won't boot until either the standard MBR or the boot manager has been installed. This is what has been forgotten, I assume. > The four-partition limit of MBR often means that > the ugly partition-with-a-partition format is required: > https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/creating-a-traditional-mbr-layout-with-bsdinstall.45072/ It's often much easier to use the CLI tools here: gpart or fdisk for partitioning, bsdlabel for creating labels. It's not that hard. :-) On the other hand, sysinstall dealt with this way of installing surprisingly easy, but sysinstall is no more. For everything bsdinstall doesn't natively handle, the CLI tools will still work. With 4 "DOS primary partitions" (slices), up to 4 operating systems can be installed. If the FreeBSD boot manager is in use, it can select which one. Almost all (common) operating systems still support installing this way. Only on systems that _require_ GPT partitioning, it will fail to be applied. Grub is an excellent replacement in such cases. And it's not hard to use either. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 13 01:42:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443BB99B40E for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 01:42:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from douhisi.pair.com (douhisi.pair.com [209.68.5.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1EFF71AFE for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 01:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from [10.2.2.1] (pool-173-48-121-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [173.48.121.235]) by douhisi.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 435B33F6D6; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:42:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <55A31780.2050103@sneakertech.com> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:42:24 -0400 From: Quartz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: kpneal@pobox.com CC: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: Questions about freebsd-update References: <559C6B73.8050509@sneakertech.com> <559EA8B8.8080701@sneakertech.com> <559ED47E.8050905@hiwaay.net> <559F25F8.1030508@sneakertech.com> <559F2853.5000103@sneakertech.com> <55A12660.9090304@gmx.de> <55A20318.8010506@sneakertech.com> <20150712192836.GA3919@neutralgood.org> In-Reply-To: <20150712192836.GA3919@neutralgood.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 01:42:32 -0000 > What level of granularity would you prefer for freebsd-update? With OSX/Windows I can see the past list of system updates/KBs made available since the base OS came out. I apparently can't do that with freebsd-update. With OSX/Windows I have the option of foregoing the most recent update(s) and installing only an older version if necessary. I apparently can't do that with freebsd-update. With OSX/Windows I have the ability to download some of the major updates separately as standalone packages, which I can then copy over via usb stick and install offline. I apparently can't do that with freebsd-update. I originally started this thread hoping that I was just wrong about freebsd-update, that maybe it was more advanced than I thought, that there was a simpler way to do updates besides the src/make/install dance. It's clear to me now that the situation is what I thought it was, so I'll just continue dealing with it the way I always have. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 13 03:51:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551F999B8E1 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 03:51:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jungleboogie0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x22b.google.com (mail-ig0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BE0D2EEC for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 03:51:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jungleboogie0@gmail.com) Received: by igcqs7 with SMTP id qs7so48468707igc.0 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 20:51:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2TKd2aw/6pLeMSf3AIIhTXuIf9nG0cEFsN4QdzWKW78=; b=LtcKzy0JQf3SdVd/AtYUw6EOVTC0S75L2yrP4+ynqBFfG8dVjI+9/DReFoSGfo4fBH Bs6z0lm2spoMrWBXhG+UroEEddxrCXvrHUxwPT7JyQHLTiT3q4yTzsH+sG+aN/MLJtk8 wTX1PjTQQ16BlmkGQyq7Y1fdrLDD9IQo5HfTrgpQJzRvD2hDFyy4KoKbmYrUJ9lDB5mF ffCSIkUeOU9O7Ho0dJiFA+FaYByGyqia+qUhAroLNVjZuCtfyzKNqDmwh9yeEVtw4sbz hLk7HPwrtcL5Z7OINrRbAJoWfCDNx48dM3HqXeLxAPoGIVhBQrlDgQvNfa0XmRBoQFys Osig== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.61.195 with SMTP id s3mr10028175igr.62.1436759479425; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 20:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.79.74.130 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 20:51:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.79.74.130 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 20:51:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55A31780.2050103@sneakertech.com> References: <559C6B73.8050509@sneakertech.com> <559EA8B8.8080701@sneakertech.com> <559ED47E.8050905@hiwaay.net> <559F25F8.1030508@sneakertech.com> <559F2853.5000103@sneakertech.com> <55A12660.9090304@gmx.de> <55A20318.8010506@sneakertech.com> <20150712192836.GA3919@neutralgood.org> <55A31780.2050103@sneakertech.com> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 20:51:19 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Questions about freebsd-update From: jungle Boogie To: Quartz Cc: FreeBSD Questions , kpneal@pobox.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 03:51:20 -0000 On Jul 12, 2015 6:42 PM, "Quartz" wrote: > > >> What level of granularity would you prefer for freebsd-update? > > > > > > I originally started this thread hoping that I was just wrong about freebsd-update, that maybe it was more advanced than I thought, that there was a simpler way to do updates besides the src/make/install dance. It's clear to me now that the situation is what I thought it was, so I'll just continue dealing with it the way I always have. > > There is hopes that pkg will replace freebsd-update in the near future. Granted, it may not meet all your needs, but I encourage you to track that closely and give your input. For more details, see this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Br6izhH5P1I From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 13 04:01:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3A699BAB1 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:01:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from geonosis.vindaloo.com (geonosis.vindaloo.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:26b:0:ac18:9026:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.vindaloo.com", Issuer "Vindaloo CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B36D5143A for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:01:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:26b:22c9:d0ff:fecc:b867] (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:26b:22c9:d0ff:fecc:b867]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by geonosis.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC51BBFD6; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:01:11 -0400 (EDT) From: Christopher Hilton X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BCCEDF9F-5B36-4E3E-B003-B712997B3121"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 00:01:10 -0400 Subject: pkg: Cannot solve job using SAT solver To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org." Message-Id: <33A35C0F-4769-4343-8DB9-0E04612779C7@vindaloo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:01:14 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_BCCEDF9F-5B36-4E3E-B003-B712997B3121 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 This morning I updated my poudriere repository. Attempting to update = packages on a client results in this: dagobah root # pkg upgrade -f Updating Vindaloo repository catalogue... Vindaloo repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking for upgrades (184 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (184 candidates): 100% pkg: Cannot solve problem using SAT solver: upgrade rule: upgrade local perl5-5.20.2_4 to remote perl5-5.18.4_11 cannot install package perl5, remove it from request? [Y/n]: n pkg: cannot solve job using SAT solver dagobah root # pkg delete perl5 No matter what you choose, pkg fails with an error: =93Cannot solve job = using SAT solver=94 On the poudriere server I notice that I now have two perl binaries: = perl5-5.20.x_y and perl5-5.18.x_y Is the issue here that I have two = perl5 packages in the repo index. Will rebuilding the repo from scratch = fix this? Chris __o "All I was trying to do was get home from work." _`\<,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)____.___o____..___..o...________ooO..._____________________ Christopher Sean Hilton [chris/at/vindaloo/dot/com] --Apple-Mail=_BCCEDF9F-5B36-4E3E-B003-B712997B3121 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVozgHAAoJEE2ar4QHIpj4QwYP/02AsvabyS37TUX7ZSroANEm mq6GzN9acPQxNIEUhARt35EfD3WB+N/4zCEkbShEB7pmIK4MxpwN/VFy2iHhLDWy ioen5fwd5EwDS4hwihxhvSEqYttWpqHN/BpoHJ7TYI1V3BTRzXjEkQGKyKtkruXL QAE5rqSgYTa6Xi3uro5mFG9jS1EldXXtfaECH/LdDTPXLEYWFawMGNaUX1vrg5qu ZYnAYfec4VHqpsN1OYig28mFQGq/vKPGAQWxOWKrvjsO9ON0MvfokrC5tl52XS8e dUu3M8JvDZFNchP0ZKFpnrGZfIKgj+iL4oeKlrpwpVWxFbwabTaW/6Utuz5sH/M7 HD+5oJvVXuFQfOKvWZUG15jKkVgq1Dfb619dHi3SCYKtSa3gwc5hX8UE/7NCJAIn nsoLXD6AfmqI99AjbrzcCrSmmnMc7xgW2sMti4rADnyRDiGDtpRxQC0xA2V3ZRf3 JkfochO9wGinFwg/eI3f/emx3LkBLT8oekDHjBsdn015e/Iz+iJQHBfJgm1kh6Bo JJ9EA//Na3AcpdHGc37FVVOLEDI2HT1rs6FRY0RcY7ztvvNZUAxd18VGqwNUR8Vl y2o/caxfdr7vG41J4LX1uO+4/2IcwKOlBnWrtbLIzweT+q0+cf6gQMfDL17dVAN7 9Xf+xQm9SHwRts+OMibe =WL3j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_BCCEDF9F-5B36-4E3E-B003-B712997B3121-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 13 04:19:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B8FE99BCB7; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:19:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AC521B09; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:19:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (ppp121-45-240-47.lns20.per4.internode.on.net [121.45.240.47]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t6D4JC7U068409 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:19:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <55A33C4B.5080303@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 12:19:23 +0800 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Peyrolon , FreeBSD Questions , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Getting Asus FM200 working with FreeBSD References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:19:19 -0000 On 7/11/15 8:29 PM, Daniel Peyrolon wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm trying to get FreeBSD-CURRENT up and running with anything different > than console-only on an Asus FM200. I created a wiki page for it: [1]. > > I've tried GhostBSD on it, and everything pretty much worked, except > suspend/resume, and audio. what about PCBSD? > I've CURRENT [2] installed on it, but so far, I haven't been able to get it > working, vesa is not even being loaded (error 19). Any idea, suggestions? > > [1]: https://wiki.freebsd.org/Laptops/ASUS_FM200 > [2]: FreeBSD BlackBox 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r285358: Fri Jul > 10 18:40:27 CEST 2015 root@BlackBox:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 13 06:37:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B3D99B31C for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:37:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27FBB1FC0 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:37:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local ([192.168.100.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t6D6aoW2001671 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 07:36:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t6D6aoW2001671 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t6D6aoW2001671; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host [192.168.100.2] claimed to be liminal.local Message-ID: <55A35C7A.5080809@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 07:36:42 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg: Cannot solve job using SAT solver References: <33A35C0F-4769-4343-8DB9-0E04612779C7@vindaloo.com> In-Reply-To: <33A35C0F-4769-4343-8DB9-0E04612779C7@vindaloo.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="6NQEXaLd1Xr0ahClDbLOkbVGfSej47bmC" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:37:07 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --6NQEXaLd1Xr0ahClDbLOkbVGfSej47bmC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 13/07/2015 05:01, Christopher Hilton wrote: > On the poudriere server I notice that I now have two perl binaries: > perl5-5.20.x_y and perl5-5.18.x_y Is the issue here that I have two > perl5 packages in the repo index. Will rebuilding the repo from > scratch fix this? The default version of perl switched from 5.18 to 5.20 some time ago... However, you shouldn't end up with mixed dependencies in your repo -- poudriere is pretty careful about rebuilding any package where there's a change in its dependency tree. That's independent of being able to build several different versions of perl itself -- but only one of those should be what anything else in the repo depends on. Doing a full rebuild shouldn't be necessary but it might give you peace of mind. The situation you describe more frequently occurs if you have configured more than one repository, and those have different default versions of perl. Use 'pkg -vv' to see a summary of your repo configuration. Remember that all released versions of FreeBSD come with the default FreeBSD repos automatically configured nowadays. You can turn the default repo off by creating /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf with the contents: FreeBSD: { enabled: no } Cheers, Matthew --6NQEXaLd1Xr0ahClDbLOkbVGfSej47bmC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVo1yBXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkAT4voP/2NEfHaT7U2154/ZtvIwOCpR TU/au/a3Gb/nL+Xfd1hmMWv8EOTB9MXaUkL3wjy+yOio4qq2JhMHdNqP9wErNqng RW94kKWg+opRQgK9gG6g3CZaLxbMygs+6QikvpSlAKSoUz9UmkU7ArRP+qjrNUQf pltMHrLCvHFqmoAklQxtEQVIbdsj8PNrQv1myco9vqgAsDoQBFm97kmjzY0NdG3b D1t1q6oQXhIX4kx+o85gjiuewdb8BDLxyOyt8ZQrY5VCa8gdswjNBF7sgu+uOFGz OT0BBzcBbuXt7fQNtNoeQVKY4Se9Mj5rFPK/pH8ZDqj+dRBlgfI2fh4mfYktor7X sHnRg8TydJzWKVDj3j1DwDx/BprVrOu+w/JMj3tfH7mVC74KuDAQu8y+m4IdJdqQ J4eh8fcWiqkNudntdXIl2GmM2CPuSxG6UcNlUxwxoJTjoYDUhyCXvnA/zJa4rm9r sNjeVqALjBkswT7IP+R9gY13VyRka/Bgm2ypyoP2/FJKMbJE+30nc/nCl8vxFpiV FUhW9GfLIOdLnvs3JIHrZxmjdp6rb3BIgI9ER9CGcWU0msjngLjanQ6eiQC94RVF 9HpuwWt6sZnN5B6ol9enYoh4Y28Nfii9gL76wEFaqxzt+dDIuOkF6PYSjIyAOzF0 f5yYUogw+Pb2+4aDKYJm =Hj+c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6NQEXaLd1Xr0ahClDbLOkbVGfSej47bmC-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 13 11:15:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C7399B1BA; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:15:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuchalia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x233.google.com (mail-la0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4B2CCEB; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:15:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tuchalia@gmail.com) Received: by lagw2 with SMTP id w2so12390306lag.3; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:15:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=JYjgtmFjJc9vLFAJQFJ1cUktAetjvpTlpvJVa3uZBNs=; b=a6IMoRFsZAgYWTHpfvQNWN+SXwInxZIZ9b29U7jQHsJXnbA2Q8DrV0pQeOr/OLVvEs QQ9iiBsZ1tj9ZLk+8UfdyqjvXACiBcAwTUWpjbFeGxjWK7jGktVcO+5PTAPCTS66/1aw JzmHoQ9679lNiTlpijmAGp/VeVO+u4zd1IqGaoC3YIIhQzGm54rsAJxb37ui48tVzOYz FbtKz2k/JSD6+ucGOSYRNr5CFXLtqLjV8JvH84fr8SU90DTjqbvn6Ss/4ocaPnyxkrJ3 mYLdMYZHvAY7DGYrIgI+dCJhMohBmQDNRN0o/z5t65BuL6Q381l6sZBC1hZpv5cJ60Is LilA== X-Received: by 10.152.1.4 with SMTP id 4mr32081641lai.25.1436786143795; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 04:15:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <55A33C4B.5080303@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <55A33C4B.5080303@freebsd.org> From: Daniel Peyrolon Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:15:34 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Getting Asus FM200 working with FreeBSD To: Julian Elischer , FreeBSD Questions , "freebsd-current@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:15:46 -0000 Hi, > what about PCBSD? Probably should have said something about PCBSD... It didn't work when trying to start X, it couldn't find the adapter. I will nevertheless try the last images tomorrow, when I can, and let you know. El lun., 13 jul. 2015 a las 6:19, Julian Elischer () escribi=C3=B3: > On 7/11/15 8:29 PM, Daniel Peyrolon wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'm trying to get FreeBSD-CURRENT up and running with anything differen= t > > than console-only on an Asus FM200. I created a wiki page for it: [1]. > > > > I've tried GhostBSD on it, and everything pretty much worked, except > > suspend/resume, and audio. > what about PCBSD? > > I've CURRENT [2] installed on it, but so far, I haven't been able to ge= t > it > > working, vesa is not even being loaded (error 19). Any idea, suggestion= s? > > > > [1]: https://wiki.freebsd.org/Laptops/ASUS_FM200 > > [2]: FreeBSD BlackBox 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0 r285358: Fri > Jul > > 10 18:40:27 CEST 2015 root@BlackBox:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > > > > > -- Daniel From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 13 08:25:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B273C99BA2D; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:25:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexl@mellanox.com) Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1on0097.outbound.protection.outlook.com [157.56.112.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DC0A1448; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:25:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexl@mellanox.com) Received: from AM3PR05MB532.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.244.146) by AM3PR05MB0950.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.161.33.27) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.213.14; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:25:21 +0000 Received: from AM3PR05MB529.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.243.155) by AM3PR05MB532.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.244.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.207.19; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:25:20 +0000 Received: from AM3PR05MB529.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.242.243.155]) by AM3PR05MB529.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.242.243.155]) with mapi id 15.01.0207.004; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:25:20 +0000 From: Alex Liptsin To: "'freebsd-net@freebsd.org'" <'freebsd-net@freebsd.org'>, "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" <'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'> Subject: VLAN priority Thread-Topic: VLAN priority Thread-Index: AdC9RXQR95/kDOflT5CRzcPN9W+DiA== Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:25:20 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: freebsd.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; x-originating-ip: [193.47.165.251] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM3PR05MB532; 5:GwfwArgzunUXmOBwhTXrVXj61aegSPqfQmh3oa9YjvNvCmkJGeFygem8HEEZzcZWp1Ud6nxtNaU0nAXKDzR2Xvr9w8CmYgUiLTfFe4avsK3azquYxE3M5087JIiNSFdSNdACrl7ZGXHtGoQahLAA+w==; 24:1HJUm9cAR/8Vy/3ksGjDM12QAWww9rcAaDdGVxI9Ht2W9x4MQEIpYYClHAwhSwwSD1Ckb4lLQvPHqS+EnAnMiWQevpDI7eP5Hc0vmkC8/vY=; 20:bXEcXNDK5buTaxgX18rppOjfOxq7ca2rU6d2YFvW4Ol6c5wtTBXU3jZ2Hat15Uxg1JRKpU6oqXMaiA46vyb6Hg== x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM3PR05MB532; UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM3PR05MB0950; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(108003899814671); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:AM3PR05MB532; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM3PR05MB532; x-forefront-prvs: 0636271852 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(164054003)(229853001)(87936001)(19625215002)(221733001)(189998001)(46102003)(2900100001)(5002640100001)(62966003)(5001960100002)(109986003)(66066001)(450100001)(77096005)(19300405004)(19580395003)(15975445007)(77156002)(33656002)(86362001)(122556002)(2656002)(76576001)(107886002)(5001920100001)(110136002)(40100003)(102836002)(5003600100002)(558084003)(50986999)(16236675004)(92566002)(54356999)(74316001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:AM3PR05MB532; H:AM3PR05MB529.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Jul 2015 08:25:20.5188 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: a652971c-7d2e-4d9b-a6a4-d149256f461b X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM3PR05MB532 X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics: 1; AM3PR05MB0950; 2:qU2MigwtSA4BCfXpoLSalcG6/a7mdFNOLWaXzTxQIMQjhNcL3NALAzMxm3uUH6F1; 3:rqQIkGH2IjYcWM9e4hEixdiODCwgqrK9oy8oIfFuHUGvcGfzx5/ubiCXvlnZQThkAoiK8ls3MuLTZ/zp2BNeCAwItOKnkFt4fg056WukQ3MEnZghmC1XILBAkSUocF5g5OHdY9FKW9dBS7BirNvQtA==; 25:cIYr6u9HFXWJ/gfMsm7FjumeRdNTD3pMLrGTmg8XX80dK0aZwJGca0bqxxkNSgN6fTgY6IMRW+e6ft/TRKoKlksQK5i80Fseehm5NVSei3iqdj5qaOJDLHdbtuUbo36eJbZs0MspZEZ+Il8Z8uvsQTvUgMFiIbAQdLP9wYdJHJv6B6u0l//4Q+B+W/xFfp3+C+hYg/9f1TK3EXwxsRS1j4ixBZ84KMfGKRw1XBYVKw+B7lU4vwcdUgVc50eQC80T; 23:pKc/lSlDN8hUwyEXeOp2MJl1mHdPeFt6yyvScqsEmzzR+6p2GtgaGyQllmfCGrHmO85HUVuZtRWDlofhJ7yIIGMlj6qHuedSmEz7vF7qlEatfTE2DdbGRpusuRxDfxP3t0uYHqJqQKxM4wr/uNdyrcSqSWQ4B+5RN5Yehy7eOi0m3PlX9aTtEMfQqXDnIUsoQL/I8MEZpsiIeApibOo+LZxTrTtmm07FkZpe9fuoVLvloAqC798JFlaeI0vgscAQ X-OriginatorOrg: Mellanox.com X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:47:36 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:25:24 -0000 Hi. How can I configure VLAN priority on FreeBSD10-STABLE or FreeBSD11-CURRENT= ? Thanks, Alex. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 13 13:19:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6D299B3DA for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from geonosis.vindaloo.com (geonosis.vindaloo.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:26b:0:ac18:9026:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.vindaloo.com", Issuer "Vindaloo CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1AE0C10; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from hadar.vindaloo.com (hadar.vindaloo.com [172.24.145.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by geonosis.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7452EBFD7; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 09:19:50 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: pkg: Cannot solve job using SAT solver Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_33B04F71-3D12-47E2-9E0E-6E0D9AD7AC2F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5 From: Christopher Hilton In-Reply-To: <55A35C7A.5080809@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 09:19:47 -0400 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <4D911D0D-43F7-4F3A-8780-1BE2A85C88A6@vindaloo.com> References: <33A35C0F-4769-4343-8DB9-0E04612779C7@vindaloo.com> <55A35C7A.5080809@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthew Seaman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:19:53 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_33B04F71-3D12-47E2-9E0E-6E0D9AD7AC2F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 On Jul 13, 2015, at 2:36 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 13/07/2015 05:01, Christopher Hilton wrote: >> On the poudriere server I notice that I now have two perl binaries: >> perl5-5.20.x_y and perl5-5.18.x_y Is the issue here that I have two >> perl5 packages in the repo index. Will rebuilding the repo from >> scratch fix this? >=20 > The default version of perl switched from 5.18 to 5.20 some time = ago... > However, you shouldn't end up with mixed dependencies in your repo -- > poudriere is pretty careful about rebuilding any package where there's = a > change in its dependency tree. That's independent of being able to > build several different versions of perl itself -- but only one of = those > should be what anything else in the repo depends on. >=20 > Doing a full rebuild shouldn't be necessary but it might give you = peace > of mind. >=20 > The situation you describe more frequently occurs if you have = configured > more than one repository, and those have different default versions of > perl. Use 'pkg -vv' to see a summary of your repo configuration. > Remember that all released versions of FreeBSD come with the default > FreeBSD repos automatically configured nowadays. You can turn the > default repo off by creating /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf = with > the contents: >=20 > FreeBSD: { enabled: no } >=20 > Cheers, >=20 > Matthew >=20 >=20 After reading UPDATING, I last rebuilt the poudriere repo on May 14th. = The Perl rev from 5.18 to 5.20 happened sometime around then. I=92ve only got one repo, the FreeBSD one is turned of. I let poudriere = rebuild a clean repo overnight and the problem has cleared. Thanks for the help!!! Chris __o "All I was trying to do was get home from work." _`\<,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)____.___o____..___..o...________ooO..._____________________ Christopher Sean Hilton [chris/at/vindaloo/dot/com] --Apple-Mail=_33B04F71-3D12-47E2-9E0E-6E0D9AD7AC2F Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVo7rzAAoJEE2ar4QHIpj41QAQALNMrcEXeSaAdADGmcaM9KBO CSTzPzqHCLdVA6D3c3nol/gRTkl8toZYVAbVDSma7kZ4v/fRok+UgDApsc0wy7Fa BGA35UNGMQG8lhXJRaBVle1JX5tN3EY0OfGMFkYKm+vO5yzTOJUtSSgW68KtP6rF +H2GSyjOCNd/JZqGOBcFQiOHhipKKz1Atq2AY9OCuJkFocnQHSJgMmhkpfkBUxhO YWvae0x5L+DnkpcLo+Zf8kMBxLxTSwCLGM/rJvWPMSi7Ki+upJ85c2/Pm/Cp5sgN mRC5aEOihdsZIZuwgFpEHaN5XuB/D3W39IyDFhoKWz7t/sZoZDxQ4y1Joe9EZ7f+ 1ccZJV7sUZYESjB12jGvGP282CUIfT61QgHNhCiKYZ9g+YHkaWSIiTfVrFeI3Je1 Oj5mE1OE9zNz/4B9jLdFKpzpesTGbx4OAE3z4XWMyMOqo7nJn7pVwS2JMmS0NC1s siC4PRevnrp3+i8JCUmlvv02xDufdWILYjEcRucOgGo8SHQoHHycJQE9cwSSobpR 0rT+SlARBlmooJpW9/XPInuC2HRmSNpPK1jjrrjhqROtx8yQKI4rb5PVzrp0qO6F 4h8DVFPCFZ4Ol3rDoej2XgGytT2i+zZosh6moHEp+gIadkfoNT2MiObOaaBniqkM JEdBMg/XNrDBltH5Www3 =IonG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_33B04F71-3D12-47E2-9E0E-6E0D9AD7AC2F-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 13 13:52:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F18299BC9B for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:52:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 405319AC for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:52:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-207-98-175-216.knology.net [207.98.175.216] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t6DDpIqX013213 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:51:19 -0500 Message-ID: <55A3C256.8080505@hiwaay.net> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:57:33 -0453 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Tor/OpenSSL question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:52:47 -0000 I am using tor (client) to help w/ privacy while browsing. I sporadically have to reboot it if it gets itself into a wad. When I do, I get messages like the following: Jul 12 07:58:40.383 [notice] Opening Socks listener on 127.0.0.1:9050 Jul 12 07:58:40.000 [notice] Parsing GEOIP IPv4 file /usr/local/share/tor/geoip. Jul 12 07:58:40.000 [notice] Parsing GEOIP IPv6 file /usr/local/share/tor/geoip6. Jul 12 07:58:40.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 0%: Starting Jul 12 07:58:42.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 80%: Connecting to the Tor network Jul 12 07:58:43.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 85%: Finishing handshake with first hop Jul 12 07:58:43.000 [notice] We weren't able to find support for all of the TLS ciphersuites that we wanted to advertise. This won't hurt security, but it might make your Tor (if run as a client) more easy for censors to block. Jul 12 07:58:43.000 [notice] To correct this, use a more recent OpenSSL, built without disabling any secure ciphers or features. Jul 12 07:58:44.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 90%: Establishing a Tor circuit Jul 12 07:58:45.000 [notice] Tor has successfully opened a circuit. Looks like client functionality is working. Jul 12 07:58:45.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 100%: Done Jul 12 12:28:01.000 [notice] Your Guard TORy0 ($1B3B5A29A431B8FE131C952A2AE1C2A3DE9763D1) is failing to carry more streams on its circuits than usual. Most likely this means the Tor network is overloaded or your network connection is poor. Use counts are 64/94. Success counts are 180/239. 233 circuits completed, 38 were unusable, 15 collapsed, and 40 timed out. For reference, your timeout cutoff is 921 seconds. It mentions that it doesn't see the latest OpenSSL. Any reason FreeBSD 9.3R isn't using that latest OpenSSL ? Not a huge issue, but puzzling. TIA & have a good one. BTW: [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:55:19am] 528 % uname -a FreeBSD kabini1.local 9.3-RELEASE-p13 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p13 #0: Tue Apr 7 03:01:12 UTC 2015 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [root@kabini1, /etc, 8:55:20am] 528 % tor-0.2.6.9, torsocks-2.0.0, openssl-1.0.2_3 -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 13 14:35:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55D79998D7 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:35:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@buildingonline.com) Received: from alisocreek.buildingonline.net (alisocreek.buildingonline.net [204.109.62.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D16A22 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:35:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@buildingonline.com) Received: by alisocreek.buildingonline.net (Postfix, from userid 58) id 40197BCCF9B; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 07:35:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on alisocreek.buildingonline.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from Brady.local (busarow2 [69.51.79.5]) (Authenticated sender: dan@dpcsys.com) by alisocreek.buildingonline.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1807ABC9FB7; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 07:35:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55A3CCA5.4070207@buildingonline.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:35:17 -0600 From: Dan Busarow Organization: BuildingOnline.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derek Schrock CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update and whatis References: <20150712130057.45FA6BCFE10@alisocreek.buildingonline.net> <55A273D9.5080108@buildingonline.com> <20150712214439.GA25794@ircbsd> In-Reply-To: <20150712214439.GA25794@ircbsd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:35:28 -0000 Derek, Thanks for suggesting old directories. I hadn't thought to check that. Both of these servers have drupal websites on them and drush was making it's backup copies in /usr/drush-backups I moved that to /usr/home/drush/drush-backups and all is good now. Thanks, Dan -- Dan Busarow dan@buildingonline.com 949 496 6648 x218 Follow BuildingOnline on: http://Twitter.com/BuildingOnline http://Facebook.com/BuildingOnline http://Linkedin.com/groupRegistration?gid=1925831 On 7/12/15 3:44 PM, Derek Schrock wrote: > Ran in the same problem and if anyone disagrees please correct me this > is all based off my observations. > > Your whatis database file is being rebuilt on a weekly basis and your > system has some third party or orphaned base files. > > /etc/periodic/weekly/320.whatis is ran on a weekly basis: > > $ fgrep weekly /etc/crontab > # Perform daily/weekly/monthly maintenance. > 15 4 * * 6 root periodic weekly > > You can see this by running freebsd-update, 320.whatis, then > freebsd-update again: > > # freebsd-update fetch > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. > Fetching metadata signature for 10.1-RELEASE from update5.freebsd.org... done. > Fetching metadata index... done. > Inspecting system... done. > Preparing to download files... done. > > The following files will be updated as part of updating to 10.1-RELEASE-p14: > /usr/share/man/whatis > > # freebsd-update install > Installing updates... done. > > # freebsd-update fetch > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. > Fetching metadata signature for 10.1-RELEASE from update5.freebsd.org... done. > Fetching metadata index... done. > Inspecting system... done. > Preparing to download files... done. > > No updates needed to update system to 10.1-RELEASE-p14. > # /etc/periodic/weekly/320.whatis > > Rebuilding whatis database: > > # freebsd-update fetch > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. > Fetching metadata signature for 10.1-RELEASE from update6.freebsd.org... done. > Fetching metadata index... done. > Inspecting system... done. > Preparing to download files... done. > > The following files will be updated as part of updating to 10.1-RELEASE-p14: > /usr/share/man/whatis > > But why is your base not in sync with the environment that builds the > freebsd-update binaries? When you run freebsd-update there's a > possibility that between updates (more likely between major updates) > there's a chance old files were removed. These could be libs, include, > binaries, man pages (in this case). > > ex: Upgrade from 9.X to 10.X pkg_* was removed including the binaries, > support, and man files among other things that changed in 9->10. > > I haven't tested this yet however freebsd-update.conf does have an > option: > > AllowDelete The single parameter following this keyword must be > ``yes'' or ``no'' and specifies whether freebsd-update > is allowed to delete files, directories, and symlinks > as part of updates downloaded. > > I don't know if this cleans the no older used/orphaned files it doesn't > appear to retroactively clean up if you've had it off. > > I believe another option is to use /usr/src/Makefile if you have > /usr/src (or a checked out source tree). I don't know if using > github.com/freebsd/freebsd/ releng/10.1 or stable/10 branch is correct. > Using a system installed /usr/src that's updated via freebsd-update > might be the correct way to go. > > ex: > > $ fgrep delete-old Makefile > # delete-old - Delete obsolete directories/files. > # delete-old-dirs - Delete obsolete directories. > # delete-old-files - Delete obsolete files. > # delete-old-libs - Delete obsolete libraries. > # 9. `make delete-old' > # 11. `make delete-old-libs' (in case no 3rd party program uses them > # anymore) > delete-old delete-old-dirs delete-old-files delete-old-libs \ > > # git branch > master > releng/10.1 > * stable/10 > # make delete-old > >>> Removing old files (only deletes safe to delete libs) > remove /usr/share/man/man9/NDHASGIANT.9.gz? > ..... > > I would like to know the best way to clean up old/orphaned base files. > > - freebsd-update (but then how do you clean up from previous updates > when you had AllowDelete set to the default value no?). > - /usr/src/Makefile > # make -C /usr/src/ delete-old # delete-old{,-dirs,-files,-libs) > I believe the only risk here is if you delete a lib that's still > being used by a third party utility > - or some other method I didn't mention. Parsing INDEX files from > freebsd-update server might be an option however very risky. > > Side note: It appears there was once a handbook article for > delete-old and delete-old-{dirs,files,libs} however it was removed. > Should it return? > > On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 08:04:09AM -0600, Dan Busarow wrote: >> I have 9 servers running 9.3-RELEASE p19 >> >> They are all pretty much identical at the / and /usr level with >> differences in /usr/local >> >> On two of these servers, freebsd-update keeps updating >> /usr/share/man/whatis after periodic weekly updates whatis >> >> The other 7 don't care. >> >> I know I can add /usr/share/man/whatis to freebsd-update.com IgnorePaths >> >> But.. what I'd really like to know is what may have triggered this >> behavior only on two out of 9 servers? >> >> Thanks, >> Dan >> >> >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >> Subject: alisocreek.buildingonline.net security updates >> Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 06:00:57 -0700 (PDT) >> From: Charlie Root >> To: root@buildingonline.net >> >> Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. >> Fetching metadata signature for 9.3-RELEASE from update.FreeBSD.org... done. >> Fetching metadata index... done. >> Inspecting system... done. >> Preparing to download files... done. >> >> The following files will be updated as part of updating to 9.3-RELEASE-p19: >> /usr/share/man/whatis >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 13 17:40:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42EA999B443 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:40:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE070834 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:40:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from moby.local ([37.6.29.167]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MYbFe-1ZREf20lNa-00VSbK for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:40:34 +0200 Message-ID: <55A3F7F2.3060400@gmx.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:40:02 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions" Subject: tar: Damaged tar archive, Retrying... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:QKiKei/LLSN3XZSX3qmOMIsMwqxlLsMfX5v52uLVhznx/zkzIuv 3dSIGr1zf+9LcCw8qawJM/Qfv8SLvfEGLkRt4EbmTfM5Und7dBVnMBMNM6Xz0XW3tlvIx7b aHbRsihst42sK0r1i69kAlH9azBoDh8OEjlzedEcabcHoCY6gcH3UeRLknR0NasxZUJGuvI 5z0B8GM1Y5EyYFif9WvDg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:je8bYdVTfi0=:7ulIJnu8uc4/reX8lKibFp wR7jQe+5uJ2Rh+lOZ2KxnmnyU8CYGaVwhZgDZWTUmGk8k+49PySPaH2xHUIaMehVWDpI+Cu0P sSjiX1046LQx2UHLgTFqPPOkjDlSOvVC60qHQblkCCVU57I5mF06LzdfPkPWUJQrJOrnrqXrB pDJmvxSqJbHKGClunYa1fLAgcSvj6+EKJyeMguI5GTVIRpZfc77Kl+oF4effD05cVa630M6wk ex7euaB0kNiFhj29KRVb7oTkm1QfOt4mI3N4BHV1LK5FUgCvjkMKgNoHNMrVnUGwu4TWOqPwv 3fQdvNbuD0p0nUqIKyc6RG1P4zcqqrpP8gc4asvjA3uASWffcrGVzd80wRy/pQKcweGBtQn+B 0VryAY/bltcAjO8oGLHtoJS3/n0IPt+jUZ1+LZdbgbqqXYMRAgu923IBw2S92NcBtRIygFhuA 4PXZSsEce3yGYRiwhkZY0+BvxcViKJKYcVnwLwVeDxOh/tFHqhj5k0OYd+wePOxiuy/HBoybz UG2dr0RCRr838cGFteSbkSgNrsFFg6N7CEoAfS9/GIVNbzDNXYGS/6+fsmNt8MsuTwrHZfyO6 FR9YY9IU2Q5I8SGcF/rh6aswRbNk8OpouEgNabsRU9WpuEXoYvOQOoFkIv+wT5U8moH4oHDdo fYu5jM0LBzrF2td9nDKbK6KOwaWcHyjr+0FLBS352Y45xgwZuOYnBNk2OyOfO9q7URow= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:40:42 -0000 Hi, I am currently using tar to copy some very files to another host and got this: > tar: Damaged tar archive > tar: Retrying... > tar: Damaged tar archive > tar: Retrying... > tar: Damaged tar archive > tar: Retrying... > tar: Damaged tar archive > tar: Retrying... > tar: Damaged tar archive The copy is done using tar|nc and nc|tar on the receiving host. This looks like a bug and I wonder whether the copy is OK. Thoughts? TIA, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 13 18:45:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3A999C15B for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 18:45:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x231.google.com (mail-ob0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1523CE95 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 18:45:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: by obbop1 with SMTP id op1so235040306obb.2 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:45:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=1ELtoq3eQdYGvRnOnzJKc5gDWGAgbhjGO0aE5QQshB4=; b=jYn427hNv7OmY8joH1Binj6kDKnKRcEGLxNJyhNzT4e4dWEq7yzaMk04YP8QuhYS15 iinRMnLjkFQrEL+vDBXZMYoUFpD2HJk1a1wOTkR2XQnJ5sfiV7mE2WrPIwxoMIDoKY+0 jAQQgC4Uq9bqmYhJzOkek+7xFUNPFIQA6N6Nma4aVobch8rvwMmEuE+Kw3t7UxMhLVWn Zi/hVFWMoCTNMSNfy3JPMIjW04tPRscYolOdoGGWeUq+xLrdJQy+cGF6swZbOwnlffKY 7BX4IiG9jKpI58Qki/C38oEEtrh/v3oV7EtqGYOEoFoTlxuYxWyhkcxUgEa0tag+oiu3 ZEfQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.69.7 with SMTP id a7mr19871060oeu.14.1436813133326; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:45:33 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.8.142 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 11:45:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:45:33 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: B-zPPCfzX4zkcitfKvtmgn4IzV0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: buildworld failing with freebsd-update server From: Rick Miller To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 18:45:34 -0000 On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Rick Miller wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm attempting to build a freebsd-update distribution based on the > instructions for building a FreeBSD Update Server[1], but buildworld is > failing during buildworld world0 and world1. The distribution being built > is amd64 10.0-RELEASE on an amd64 10.0-RELEASE-p18 node. > > Signs of trouble first appears in init.sh's STDOUT while executing > buildworld() world0. It errors citing the following error with no further > detail. If the command is executed manually substituting valid values for > the variables, it outputs the jail command usage implying incorrect syntax. > > "jail: /usr/bin/env -i > PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/root/bin > RELP=10.0-RELEASE BRANCH_OVERRIDE= TARGET=amd64 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 /bin/sh > -e: failed" > > Both buildworld errors are hyperlinked below: > > world0: http://hostileadmin.com/logs/buildworld_world0_error.txt > world1: http://hostileadmin.com/logs/buildworld_world1_error.txt > > The amd64 10.0-RELEASE build.conf is: > > /*** begin build.conf ***/ > # cat build.conf > # SHA256 hash of disc1.iso image. > export > RELH=9c377b4a4e63443c0b210080694de26133e6a276eddb07c7e00e1c9aebd84109 > export FTP=http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/10.0/ > > # Components of the world, source, and kernels > export WORLDPARTS="base doc" > export SOURCEPARTS="src" > export KERNELPARTS="kernel" > > # EOL date > export EOL=1484870400 > /*** end build.conf ***/ > > > It's unclear if the fatal error is the jail error or the buildworld errors > or a combination of the two, but the jail error seemingly implies > buildworld is occurring in /usr/src outside of the jail and may be the main > cause of the failures. Does this sound reasonable? Does anyone have any > guidance to debug this scenario? > The jail error in STDOUT has been confirmed to be a result of make's stop error hyperlinked to in the above thread. This error is occurring with the stock FreeBSD-10.0-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso. Is there a problem with the ISO? -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 13 19:10:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFFE99C95D for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:10:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-f170.google.com (mail-ig0-f170.google.com [209.85.213.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EB0F1951 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:10:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: by igbij6 with SMTP id ij6so29336933igb.1 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 12:10:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=references:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; bh=7HSp+Crtli4myHYfGPYjckUy//BUzuWiGXlTne0BY0c=; b=XufnAQ5Pqtqq+5szpOoypwhd9ZzrjTgthBbiar3Fs5p973P93of4KEl1fNRLFnDVsW 29KBzZeoZF5mCPBVPf2BCWyPX8OAaqYcfl2kJDPe7BSAaqWKPStajxCbT+12MxHePvcd mWRDWlm4W06TQ/295uuQXECiPotWSdrkyOJ1LCY8e1GGjYK27EpACZan0AKUxzj6kyrW W+mvYsbhBo14cVMotCnPfQvxMcaJZm908m1Zw1/NYQLY+a9E0sbzcuMM5hffzeBCQ2Hq +0bQ7Wkzkpl78+CBFL6rKXJ0bjiZ1W6XYM61Gbxb94BCcUcAcG4i21RQokD/LkPItcMH 3MqA== X-Received: by 10.107.10.93 with SMTP id u90mr19236125ioi.160.1436814634030; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 12:10:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WorkBox.Home.gmail.com (75-168-176-141.mpls.qwest.net. [75.168.176.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j20sm6261612igt.5.2015.07.13.12.10.32 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Jul 2015 12:10:33 -0700 (PDT) References: <55A03950.6090209@gmail.com> <55A05CFE.90608@columbus.rr.com> <55A0843A.9050806@gmail.com> <20150711045325.9eed25ae.freebsd@edvax.de> <44io9qj1gg.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <20150711191106.bca7e735.freebsd@edvax.de> From: Brandon J. Wandersee To: Polytropon Cc: Lowell Gilbert , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, jd1008 Subject: Re: Building TB from source code In-reply-to: <20150711191106.bca7e735.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 14:10:31 -0500 Message-ID: <86r3ob7u1k.fsf@WorkBox.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:10:35 -0000 >> > Poudriere will use the sources from the FreeBSD ports collection. >> >> Which in the case of Firefox and Thunderbird, >> will pull in the sources from mozilla.com. > > And probably add FreeBSD-specific patches. > 38 patches, to be precise. I can't think of a single Unix-like OS (short of LFS) on which it is regular practice to build and install using autotools and the upstream Makefile. Debian, Arch, Gentoo, CRUX, Slackware, OpenSuSE, FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD--in all cases, it's strongly recommended that the system's native software management tools be used to build a package that can be installed and tracked for easy updates, customization, and removal. -- ================================================================= :: Brandon Wandersee :: :: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com :: ================================================================== 'A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.' - Douglas Adams ================================================================== From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 13 20:45:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3FD699CB70 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:45:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-f177.google.com (mail-ie0-f177.google.com [209.85.223.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96D741568 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:45:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: by iecuq6 with SMTP id uq6so243658747iec.2 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:45:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=references:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; bh=eUrQyxytfX3wwp/YHCsJ1AZZqvmBABp3Wa+YldX0aVo=; b=bHMVkHcOWB6F/TLSP8Rmww84a8vgcrOHDwT5gjvHZ9pl0P7thHDOFcAzM4WaJtIAPi rFefeHzpZ4RHTvsb8H0KEc/VEgHSpVpuH6n1T9MkfxZG8Oq5QsWeCEkmTQ1SrJcHrNIX hyvEjGuNf5eyH26mGQtMFwvEvmtkLzWf/+UyuXejJnxvm9gJ6BjOv0tRrV5WG4qQQbT8 EPBOFdOlDAFcclTlAq9sDIy2g8hti8p/Z21kw4fBVRu+A3Xj6M+bMOEVUJWMewxfDdm9 yquwBYdK8TFmmJiCaNq3Gl8kiAofxbDKsqTBigbtJkIeU82UiFsAg4E6hVPkMcf6aTdb rcNQ== X-Received: by 10.107.153.5 with SMTP id b5mr18902274ioe.143.1436820322611; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:45:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WorkBox.Home.gmail.com (75-168-176-141.mpls.qwest.net. [75.168.176.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m1sm6423201igv.8.2015.07.13.13.45.20 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:45:21 -0700 (PDT) References: <559C6B73.8050509@sneakertech.com> <559EA8B8.8080701@sneakertech.com> <559ED47E.8050905@hiwaay.net> <559F25F8.1030508@sneakertech.com> <559F2853.5000103@sneakertech.com> <55A12660.9090304@gmx.de> <55A20318.8010506@sneakertech.com> From: Brandon J. Wandersee To: Quartz Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: Questions about freebsd-update In-reply-to: <55A20318.8010506@sneakertech.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:45:19 -0500 Message-ID: <86pp3v7pnk.fsf@WorkBox.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:45:28 -0000 Quartz writes: >>When you install Windows and a service pack, you can't stop in >> the half of the service pack installation. >> >> freebsd-update make the same thing like windows update, it will install >> security updates. > > Well, sorta. With Windows or OSX or whatever you can get a list of all > the updates it wants to install and you can check/uncheck them > individually, and you can download a lot of the major > updates/KBs/service packs separately and install them offline if you > need to. I was hoping there was something similar for FreeBSD. The analogy remains apt. When you update a Windows system, you do indeed have the option to select which updates are installed and which are withheld, but each of those updates is a single package comprising multiple files. The same holds for freebsd-update: when you use it, you get an update containing multiple files that have been modified with the latest changes. The difference is that you don't get to install updates 1-3, 5, 7, and 10-13. You have to install all of them. This may be less slightly less versatile than the Windows and OS X cases, but that's irrelevant, because the design and development model of FreeBSD is fundamentally different. It seems to me that there are two roadblocks to understanding, here: first, the behavior you describe--having multiple updates installed with freebsd-update, without any choice in which ones get installed--will only occur provided you do not update your system every time a FreeBSD Security Advisory or Errata Notice is sent out. In such a case, when you finally get around to updating the system, yes, every previous update will be installed along with the latest one. The reasoning behind this is, quite simply, that the only reason a x.x-RELEASE version of FreeBSD gets updated is for major security and bug fixes, and since freebsd-update is just a convenient way of getting security and bug fixes on x.x-RELEASE versions, there's no reason to apply some updates but not others. To put this another way: the updates you get with freebsd-update are inherently conservative, and don't introduce any new, untested features. *Only updates considered vital to a stable, secure system are included.* All of the testing and experimentation takes place in the -STALBE and -CURRENT branches, which cannot be updated via freebsd-update anyway. The only way to avoid a bulk update is to track the releng/* or stable/* branch of your version of FreeBSD (such as releng/10), manually update your local source repository to whichever commit you wish to test, and rebuild world. This brings up the second possible barrier to understanding: even supposing you updated your system by rebuilding world from source one commit at a time, you still wouldn't have absolute control over everything that got updated, because a single commit to the FreeBSD source tree could contain changes to multiple, unrelated facets of the system. So even a single commit could still function much the same way a freebsd-update distribution would: multiple files from multiple facets of the system being updated simultaneously. There's simply no way to get control over every single aspect of the system short of manually patching every single file. Again, though, in the case of releng/* branches, the updates are inherently conservative: only those things immediately necessary to maintaining or enhancing security and stability are changed. So not only is there no greatly compelling reason to apply individual updates via freebsd-update, but the only compelling reason to build from source is to control the components installed with the base system via src.conf(5). In either case, the only updates to the base system you'll receive are those you really shouldn't be passing up anyway, and which shouldn't have any profound effect on how third-party applications function on the system. -- ================================================================= :: Brandon Wandersee :: :: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com :: ================================================================== 'A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.' - Douglas Adams ================================================================== From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 13 20:57:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BBF799CE5A for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:57:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3175E2E1 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:57:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-114.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A912924DA6; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 22:57:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t6DKv9oS002198; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 22:57:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 22:57:09 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Nikos Vassiliadis Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions" Subject: Re: tar: Damaged tar archive, Retrying... Message-Id: <20150713225709.55553c98.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <55A3F7F2.3060400@gmx.com> References: <55A3F7F2.3060400@gmx.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:57:22 -0000 On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:40:02 +0300, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently using tar to copy some very files to another host and > got this: > > tar: Damaged tar archive > > tar: Retrying... > > tar: Damaged tar archive > > tar: Retrying... > > tar: Damaged tar archive > > tar: Retrying... > > tar: Damaged tar archive > > tar: Retrying... > > tar: Damaged tar archive > > The copy is done using tar|nc and nc|tar on the receiving host. > This looks like a bug and I wonder whether the copy is OK. Create a checksum list on the source and the target machine, them compare both. This should give you a good overview of the files to be identical. Furthermore: Are you using compression? If yes: Is it using the same compression libraries on both sides? (Just a guess, it should not have to matter...) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jul 13 23:40:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595C1995D33 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 23:40:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE1E49FC for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 23:40:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from moby.local ([37.6.29.167]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MOOdZ-1ZINps2GOL-005tko; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 01:40:41 +0200 Message-ID: <55A44C50.70500@gmx.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 02:40:00 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon CC: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions" Subject: Re: tar: Damaged tar archive, Retrying... References: <55A3F7F2.3060400@gmx.com> <20150713225709.55553c98.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20150713225709.55553c98.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:5v8xpx2bOh0LZdN8uANizQw5+coFi0TK9Dj2451XUZ86LwTZzFY 8uf3LlDdWIpN9qn5hSWrVnsEUL6MfS6v96O1f0ckNhGCzqwJWNhFrI0/Rg1mzSekd/0h119 RwLofZFBwDE9+0XUqgGRMminidCYPN4Bvp2Jdi9UF3S5YHCk2IeIPcxVr9SOm5CHKJqaJ56 rbpQenmBQ0GZd95Jm9fnA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:ZezLR4mPc7A=:ca4g+THHoAEigGNRAcr571 JcBr49cVXHeQRZdddAQ+nb7OHq1lR2wslUb6jJhY4JKW0+86w1lEQknT21dQdrV/T3hNlgr47 odg08OeFmQvTNZOHqrdKU/qEGTYoGW6NwilQZ76qEIGVkMQkDomF6ZOXs1gqLGmyAR/eRWPxW 9CzjCXBb/dwA+ABlbpsvk/2ToLVmoDo5BcSTJZky4pf1f067Gq2PJUa5P+EJhr+iY2EaRfque uR+sXYLFMvS4DzkpajO7ABqQFe1QMnsHBiqmLlWcH890EGC47VHSvj0DD0KHJL8th2El5a2GH QNlZ29IcCZmDqTeDQzhCeCCDLDPbTCZ0kA6YdAW/Ep+hhwDGgo0JRqSulivfNFxd6jUodA2yw qLkV2CrwOOOicSCAcc/FtHrWL4fN2Bh7SXUghSp0l633CBfwSDMYI/bGPkdk960YvvUUDtFSQ gBTYERq5jo3GtLlRu03rO4tW3JmVsQ3AxtjpfykFq5i1Bii7nMgcAunRizuZXOu7/Hi7tRclv v0jLU6wfbWbDBd9FCMlA6XkL8m176xvytWLRck/opn6HffdeFJVc1aTx1i2DJBAbxVU6oPxqT ifWCIiuqulk44ucjezsru0IkKdVpn+fAZt7QQObNvvZ0SO3rnZGUz20X4mr2Hcrx5eSVwFJrl jPjQjZHymwG4s/wRiMH3xLsJwNGPkwq91ntn6HQji3+emd4GmOWZnkO0bMPpqSyudDmc= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 23:40:50 -0000 On 07/13/15 23:57, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:40:02 +0300, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am currently using tar to copy some very files to another host and >> got this: >>> tar: Damaged tar archive >>> tar: Retrying... >>> tar: Damaged tar archive >>> tar: Retrying... >>> tar: Damaged tar archive >>> tar: Retrying... >>> tar: Damaged tar archive >>> tar: Retrying... >>> tar: Damaged tar archive >> >> The copy is done using tar|nc and nc|tar on the receiving host. >> This looks like a bug and I wonder whether the copy is OK. > > Create a checksum list on the source and the target machine, > them compare both. This should give you a good overview of > the files to be identical. For sure a checksum will do that. I am lucky that the system has an SSD, those files are huge. Results: Two out of three files are OK. One was removed, maybe the one that printed out the warnings. This is definitely something that should be further investigated:) > Furthermore: Are you using compression? If yes: Is it using > the same compression libraries on both sides? (Just a guess, > it should not have to matter...) > > > No, I am not using compression. Just tar. I am very curious regarding this. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 00:10:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30F949995DF for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 00:10:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA5E111EA for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 00:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-114.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FD7A3CD88; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 02:10:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t6E09x8p002976; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 02:10:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 02:09:59 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Nikos Vassiliadis Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions" Subject: Re: tar: Damaged tar archive, Retrying... Message-Id: <20150714020959.bf3d8121.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <55A44C50.70500@gmx.com> References: <55A3F7F2.3060400@gmx.com> <20150713225709.55553c98.freebsd@edvax.de> <55A44C50.70500@gmx.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 00:10:05 -0000 On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 02:40:00 +0300, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > > > On 07/13/15 23:57, Polytropon wrote: > > On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:40:02 +0300, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I am currently using tar to copy some very files to another host and > >> got this: > >>> tar: Damaged tar archive > >>> tar: Retrying... > >>> tar: Damaged tar archive > >>> tar: Retrying... > >>> tar: Damaged tar archive > >>> tar: Retrying... > >>> tar: Damaged tar archive > >>> tar: Retrying... > >>> tar: Damaged tar archive > >> > >> The copy is done using tar|nc and nc|tar on the receiving host. > >> This looks like a bug and I wonder whether the copy is OK. > > > > Create a checksum list on the source and the target machine, > > them compare both. This should give you a good overview of > > the files to be identical. > > For sure a checksum will do that. I am lucky that the system has an > SSD, those files are huge. Results: > Two out of three files are OK. One was removed, maybe the one > that printed out the warnings. While md5 doesn't provide you an exact 1:1 comparison of files, it's good to spot irregularities, as you could see. So there really is something different on the target side. > This is definitely something that should be further investigated:) If you grep through the sources, you'll find that the error message originates from libarchive, not tar itself (directly). Involved files: /usr/src/lib/libarchive/archive_read_support_format_tar.c /usr/src/usr.bin/tar/read.c Is there a significant version mismatch between source and target system? It shouldn't affect readability of tar archives (simply because tar is _the_ universal archiving format across operating systems), but maybe you can check that. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 00:27:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0905499992B for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 00:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wiml@omnigroup.com) Received: from omnigroup.com (omnigroup.com [198.151.161.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "omnigroup.com", Issuer "The Omni Group CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E14AA1AD9 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 00:27:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wiml@omnigroup.com) Received: from machamp.omnigroup.com (machamp.omnigroup.com [198.151.161.135]) by omnigroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FF0241AD8C for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.4.3.119] (pfsense.omnigroup.com [198.151.161.131]) by machamp.omnigroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47A9111A28D0 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:15:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Wim Lewis Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Naming a locally-built version of a package Message-Id: <37E1F657-243D-4F8F-A563-0C17B344D1B9@omnigroup.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:19:09 -0700 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 00:27:28 -0000 Is there a particular recommended practice for naming a locally-built = package that is built with a local patch, or different configure = options, etc., so that it works well with the rest of the package = system, particularly dependencies and things? Ideally: let's say I'm building a custom version of Foo-1.3. I'd like to = name it such that: - Existing packages that require Foo will be satisfied by my patched = Foo - Local packages which require my patched Foo can specify a = dependency on it Less important but nice: - pkg audit will still recognize my Foo as Foo and inform me of = things I should know - The system won't suggest to "upgrade" my Foo to a non-patched Foo = of a later version=20 Is this (or a subset) possible with pkgng? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 04:08:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCA099C8CC for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 04:08:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vasya.pupkin.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com (mail-wi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D1D621C6 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 04:08:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vasya.pupkin.bsd@gmail.com) Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so3520946wib.0 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 21:08:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=F+l70WlVZAjAO6YCaKEzxR+bsa3M2UVJ/j/3FIdrlVg=; b=oGXh5Y3qiAmxeYgyef8ZEmgxnHQ7yvU6Iwukd+LU/ltFtAZp7ZQaZfK4gxGX34qZbA 7RP5jNaYq7F0BXwzlcpQJ8YQmFlGaL3KLLQXVCPvHDU5dCQV3UcakuDC7mXbV5ly1yvH Dk8DeS8JJ7mOqhFo9X99WSzL3RUJOL6t3XuMXiB1s+I0ETpUyUowD6xx3ZmINwDhbY08 NqPAp4odf2bFL1mxvgXFxkfqgVUnG+kbUllSVylS08+6uFDGGmHeKeQf/ysyakorI6yb JpVQZKGnZbUopaGLwmzyvpA0AemXd0xXHyh4/J6ikpFGw44eUOoyUjqxJhsgvq+U3InU Otmg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.185.146 with SMTP id fc18mr70771844wjc.46.1436846898260; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 21:08:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.179.26 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 21:08:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:08:18 +0500 Message-ID: Subject: How set CFLAGS for individual port? From: =?UTF-8?B?0JLQsNGB0LjQu9C40Lkg0JjQstCw0L3QvtCy0LjRhw==?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 04:08:21 -0000 Hi! I have a -CURRENT i386 machine. And my make.conf have build options: CFLAGS= -Os -pipe But some ports not builds by clang 3.6.1 with any optimizations except -O0 (for example devel/gettext-tools), and solution for older BSD versions: .if ${.CURDIR} == "/usr/ports/devel/gettext-tools" CFLAGS= -O0 -pipe .endif not works now. It give that error: make: "/etc/make.conf" line 26: Unassociated shell command "CFLAGS = -O0 -pipe -march=pentium-m" make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continuemake: "/etc/make.conf" line 26: Unassociated shell command "CFLAGS = -O0 -pipe -march=pentium-m" make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue===>>> Launching 'make checksum' for devel/gettext-tools in background make: make: ""/etc/make.conf/etc/make.conf" line 26: " line 26: Unassociated shell command "CFLAGS = -O0 -pipe -march=pentium-m"Unassociated shell command "CFLAGS = -O0 -pipe -march=pentium-m" make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continuemake: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/gettext-tools ===>>> Gathering dependency list for devel/gettext-tools from ports make: "/etc/make.conf" line 26: Unassociated shell command "CFLAGS = -O0 -pipe -march=pentium-m" make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue ===>>> Cannot cd to make: ===>>> Aborting update How can i set various build options for individual ports? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 04:35:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C065999CEA1 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 04:35:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8474C2D56 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 04:35:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-114.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 812AD3CD0B; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 06:35:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t6E4ZBof005931; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 06:35:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 06:35:11 +0200 From: Polytropon To: =?UTF-8?B?0JLQsNGB0LjQu9C40Lkg0JjQstCw0L3QvtCy0LjRhw==?= Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How set CFLAGS for individual port? Message-Id: <20150714063511.6e167ffb.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 04:35:21 -0000 On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:08:18 +0500, Василий Иванович wrote: > Hi! > > I have a -CURRENT i386 machine. And my make.conf have build options: > CFLAGS= -Os -pipe > But some ports not builds by clang 3.6.1 with any optimizations except -O0 > (for example devel/gettext-tools), and solution for older BSD versions: > .if ${.CURDIR} == "/usr/ports/devel/gettext-tools" > CFLAGS= -O0 -pipe > .endif > > not works now. It give that error: > make: "/etc/make.conf" line 26: Unassociated shell command "CFLAGS = > -O0 -pipe -march=pentium-m" > make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continuemake: "/etc/make.conf" > line 26: Unassociated shell command "CFLAGS = -O0 -pipe > -march=pentium-m" > make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue===>>> Launching 'make > checksum' for devel/gettext-tools in background > make: make: ""/etc/make.conf/etc/make.conf" line 26: " line 26: > Unassociated shell command "CFLAGS = -O0 -pipe > -march=pentium-m"Unassociated shell command "CFLAGS = -O0 -pipe > -march=pentium-m" > > make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continuemake: Fatal errors > encountered -- cannot continue > make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/gettext-tools > ===>>> Gathering dependency list for devel/gettext-tools from ports > make: "/etc/make.conf" line 26: Unassociated shell command "CFLAGS = > -O0 -pipe -march=pentium-m" > make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue > ===>>> Cannot cd to make: > ===>>> Aborting update > > How can i set various build options for individual ports? Try this: .if ${.CURDIR:M*/devel/gettext-tools*} CFLAGS= -O0 -pipe .endif This will apply CFLAGS as intended (and therefore discard any other CFLAGS setting) for the port at its top level as well as any subdirectories. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 04:54:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB669245 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 04:54:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vasya.pupkin.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x231.google.com (mail-wg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13FC92686 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 04:54:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vasya.pupkin.bsd@gmail.com) Received: by wgmn9 with SMTP id n9so58264375wgm.0 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 21:54:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=GjHd/jx7QiNXeRdlXrAfmspaVhVfxtIagwNjLubFVSQ=; b=psA9KL3/Ad9WfeUPP7BH8SurbwDsxL7FkyQCmHN+K3Nf7NXvhslDr5AF5PmhG/lhfT CBafqgHBWsQ0OJOhuHRiWlQqsmQXHaTVJ6OgRvltCLW77ZgYhNDYtbB+xiWRwWNgxKLk f8KiMrMHbtj0m2ybOfC6xk/7g7X7AZvwAIZ+Ffb/jvaaFZbC8iskipOf8Yp9vmmxrjdx xhBPctNsgySsCtKKaXPC787+ooCPf9LBuGjkdRcc4/ASGK5Z7SfL2c6qZV84zF0hv1pq mHOuMqdhNMGEBED5CYLMnLXSdWQWIxmgaOtuGBsvTQIrRl0rcbYlCjO//X5GM41rAEBt Fmiw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.178.5 with SMTP id cu5mr3335086wjc.59.1436849696243; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 21:54:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.27.179.26 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 21:54:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150714063511.6e167ffb.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20150714063511.6e167ffb.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:54:56 +0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How set CFLAGS for individual port? From: =?UTF-8?B?0JLQsNGB0LjQu9C40Lkg0JjQstCw0L3QvtCy0LjRhw==?= To: Polytropon Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 04:54:58 -0000 2015-07-14 9:35 GMT+05:00 Polytropon : > On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:08:18 +0500, =D0=92=D0=B0=D1=81=D0=B8=D0=BB=D0=B8= =D0=B9 =D0=98=D0=B2=D0=B0=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=B2=D0=B8=D1=87 wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I have a -CURRENT i386 machine. And my make.conf have build options: > > CFLAGS=3D -Os -pipe > > But some ports not builds by clang 3.6.1 with any optimizations except > -O0 > > (for example devel/gettext-tools), and solution for older BSD versions: > > .if ${.CURDIR} =3D=3D "/usr/ports/devel/gettext-tools" > > CFLAGS=3D -O0 -pipe > > .endif > > > > not works now. It give that error: > > make: "/etc/make.conf" line 26: Unassociated shell command "CFLAGS = =3D > > -O0 -pipe -march=3Dpentium-m" > > make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continuemake: "/etc/make.conf" > > line 26: Unassociated shell command "CFLAGS =3D -O0 -pipe > > -march=3Dpentium-m" > > make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue=3D=3D=3D>>> Launching= 'make > > checksum' for devel/gettext-tools in background > > make: make: ""/etc/make.conf/etc/make.conf" line 26: " line 26: > > Unassociated shell command "CFLAGS =3D -O0 -pipe > > -march=3Dpentium-m"Unassociated shell command "CFLAGS =3D -O0 -pipe > > -march=3Dpentium-m" > > > > make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continuemake: Fatal errors > > encountered -- cannot continue > > make: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/gettext-tools > > =3D=3D=3D>>> Gathering dependency list for devel/gettext-tools from por= ts > > make: "/etc/make.conf" line 26: Unassociated shell command "CFLAGS = =3D > > -O0 -pipe -march=3Dpentium-m" > > make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue > > =3D=3D=3D>>> Cannot cd to make: > > =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update > > > > How can i set various build options for individual ports? > > Try this: > > .if ${.CURDIR:M*/devel/gettext-tools*} > CFLAGS=3D -O0 -pipe > .endif > > This will apply CFLAGS as intended (and therefore discard any > other CFLAGS setting) for the port at its top level as well as > any subdirectories. > > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > Thanks Polytropon! I'm tryin your suggestion and it gives me error againg. After that I'm tryin to delete TAB aligment before CFLAGS=3D... and it works! Sorry for my mistake :) From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 05:58:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679579BC7 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 05:58:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2378A2C54 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 05:58:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-74-114.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.74.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E988424E72; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 07:58:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id t6E5w9Vu006204; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 07:58:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 07:58:09 +0200 From: Polytropon To: =?UTF-8?B?0JLQsNGB0LjQu9C40Lkg0JjQstCw0L3QvtCy0LjRhw==?= Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How set CFLAGS for individual port? Message-Id: <20150714075809.57674e50.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20150714063511.6e167ffb.freebsd@edvax.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 05:58:14 -0000 On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:54:56 +0500, Василий Иванович wrote: > I'm tryin your suggestion and it gives me error againg. After that I'm > tryin to delete TAB aligment before CFLAGS=... and it works! The tab character in the 1st column is significant in Makefile, and make.conf seems to inherit this behaviour in this case. Not all files are "pretty printing" capable. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 08:50:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC3C99C194 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 08:50:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C711D27D for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 08:50:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t6E8oXF2033657 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:50:40 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=freebsd.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t6E8oXF2033657 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t6E8oXF2033657; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <55A4CD4E.3040003@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:50:22 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Naming a locally-built version of a package References: <37E1F657-243D-4F8F-A563-0C17B344D1B9@omnigroup.com> In-Reply-To: <37E1F657-243D-4F8F-A563-0C17B344D1B9@omnigroup.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cekIi6qv51EPlEIVrr1iCWlU2Xw1RJpWb" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 08:50:47 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --cekIi6qv51EPlEIVrr1iCWlU2Xw1RJpWb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/14/15 01:19, Wim Lewis wrote: > Is there a particular recommended practice for naming a > locally-built package that is built with a local patch, or different co= nfigure > options, etc., so that it works well with the rest of the package > system, particularly dependencies and things? If what you're doing is tweaking an existing package built out of the ports tree, then mostly people wouldn't bother giving it a special name. It's just a locally built version of the 'foobar' package. However, it is perfectly feasible to create your own ports and overlay on the ports tree. You can add a Makefile.local at pretty much any level of the tree so you can add Makefile-foo to an individual port (eg. to add new options or similar). Similarly you can add your own ports or even entire new categories of ports. For the sort of thing you want to do, you would probably want to create a slave port with the original as master -- which is certainly the way to go if you happened to want to build both modified and unmodified versions of the port. > Ideally: let's say I'm building a custom version of Foo-1.3. I'd like t= o name it such that: > - Existing packages that require Foo will be satisfied by my patched= Foo > - Local packages which require my patched Foo can specify a dependen= cy on it This is much harder. Dependencies are registered against the PKGNAME of a port, and that is required by pkg(8) to be unique across the ports tree. You'ld probably have to modify all the dependent ports to change their RUN_DEPENDS or LIB_DEPENDS settings to point to your modified port.= As I said above, usually people just use the original port name with their own modifications, and it's mostly because of dependency tracking like this. There was discussion at BSDCan about introducing 'flexible dependencies' -- which is essentially a list of packages (including version number ranges) that could be used to fulfil a dependency, but even so, you'ld still have to add your custom ports to that list. > Less important but nice: > - pkg audit will still recognize my Foo as Foo and inform me of thin= gs I should know > - The system won't suggest to "upgrade" my Foo to a non-patched Foo = of a later version=20 >=20 > Is this (or a subset) possible with pkgng? pkg audit matches against the PKGNAME as I recall, so doubtful that it would alert you to security problems in your modified package. However, it is certainly possible to tell pkg(8) not to mess with locally customized packages. See pkg-lock(8). The mechanism is not entirely as smooth as we would like it to be, and pkg(8) should grow the intelligence to understand that replacing a package 'Foo with option bar' with a package 'Foo without option bar' is something that should be avoided wherever possible. Cheers, Matthew --cekIi6qv51EPlEIVrr1iCWlU2Xw1RJpWb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVpM1YAAoJEABRPxDgqeTnuUAP/it/0EDbPDeZDOkM8PR6ejPU BAqcAVmm0aYDwk3/CnMXAjWbVhC1yJZEXyjf9Z7TFUg7q/8NrI9rNSgJiW3hOvp0 ulO+KJc4l4jnwzo+d8D7NjOrqFUEosafeo1xCTqIb9EZmFoxlYJTM4rJUpdv6U0U m8SmpjAAzH+rFFhlnewjo4vYWi3P+J2i/iR0ZtWhy1V3BbbZJscpWd6Lu56L5jeH lV+kRfiNjjZDkYT5kaQpohpaGC/GqhuorENjTyH9pVPsm+w7aNtf0jodr9WXT/1M ppXGH4ROU119sDdJS4c1U48GP9cxc6O7733uLtoJhT8jOT4vtGre1RCAmetS6Zyc 0wkvWAdFyH9Gm9huLCWIj3one4h9fBsK0fJcupGJUtuqSMUqxavy+uTGuDn+SQBN sxLr5epcO9SIFOjmZbfdWK2dNDwbOcWFnKNN9Tk9v1PyYxMQmP5aaTFV0VYxmdQp n9ZGUXTpYFyaQhX39EC+EXjYh99VzJHX+qhbzuE4qhGV2kqOz6MuGWLZG9prIfeN qJj23O9E9w+kC91on2knmRFJz8Q+eJuOBTcwmeNIxD/phMv8ArZUTca/HR8ShfSR e9UhQlI5J/2FE2UFyTBD7aMxYIVhxgSd/JVLFcuzbwRzFR7EFoRqMNRde8pNEJcQ Ns5EY7zpCIZm3jc5dXYY =kwJQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cekIi6qv51EPlEIVrr1iCWlU2Xw1RJpWb-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 10:35:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5E599C38D for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:35:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE124F4 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:35:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1ZExY4-003BeN-5w>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:34:52 +0200 Received: from p578a69f9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([87.138.105.249] helo=freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1ZExY4-001YsL-0D>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:34:52 +0200 Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:34:46 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Howto create password hash for Windows server 2012 with freeBSD/Samba Message-ID: <20150714123446.3dfc808d@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.27; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: 87.138.105.249 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:35:02 -0000 Scenario: A CURRENT box is to mount a share from a windows server 2012r2 machine using autofs(5). Setting up the SHAREs on Windows 2012 side and connecting to those shares via FreeBSD's mount_smbfs(8) manually went smoothly. But when it comes to automated mounting a Windows 2012 share via automounter (autofs) I fail. Autofs is setup using mount_smbfs with the "-N" option. regarding the documentation /etc/nsmb.conf is looked up for an appropriate setup and password=XXXXX field. Cleartext passwords do not work with M$ server 2012r2. Now I'm looking for a way to generate a "Hash" to put it into /etc/nsmb.conf. Some websites tell the hash is NT MD4 hash. generating a md4 hash with FreeBSD's onboard-tools is not possible, as far as i can see. crypt(3) uses the ability to generate a NT hash depending on the mode set for using the appropriate hash algorithm, but I can not see how I could use/misuse passwd or any related onboard tool to emmit a NT hash. Please CC me via email (not subscribing the list) and help and suggestions are highly appreciated. Thanks in advance, Oliver From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 12:26:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C2899CF3A for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:26:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48FE616A for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:26:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-207-98-175-216.knology.net [207.98.175.216] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t6ECQVHX010578 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 07:26:32 -0500 Message-ID: <55A4FFF7.2020400@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 07:32:46 -0453 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: Another tor question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 12:26:34 -0000 .... I am using tor with firefox to browse the web. Some sites seem to detect & block this type of access. Sometimes, however, I seem to slither through, usually 1st thing in the A.M. after my (cable-modem) access has been offline all night & tor has dropped all of its circuits (according to its log file). Is that in fact an accurate analysis, i.e. I am browsing 'naked' until tor re-establishes circuits ? System info: [root@kabini1, /etc, 7:31:25am] 551 % uname -a FreeBSD kabini1.local 9.3-RELEASE-p13 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p13 #0: Tue Apr 7 03:01:12 UTC 2015 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 [root@kabini1, /etc, 7:31:32am] 552 % tor-0.2.6.9, torsocks-2.0.0 From tor's log file: [root@kabini1, /etc, 7:26:59am] 440 % ( tail -20 /var/log/tor ; date ) Jul 13 22:36:09.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. Discarding this circuit. Jul 13 22:42:30.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. Discarding this circuit. Jul 13 22:42:31.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. Discarding this circuit. Jul 13 22:42:32.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. Discarding this circuit. Jul 13 22:43:49.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. Discarding this circuit. Jul 13 22:48:54.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. Discarding this circuit. Jul 13 22:50:11.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. Discarding this circuit. Jul 13 22:50:12.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. Discarding this circuit. Jul 13 22:50:13.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. Discarding this circuit. Jul 13 22:50:14.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. Discarding this circuit. Jul 13 22:54:03.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. Discarding this circuit. Jul 13 22:54:04.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. Discarding this circuit. Jul 13 22:54:05.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. Discarding this circuit. Jul 13 22:56:38.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. Discarding this circuit. Jul 13 22:56:39.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. Discarding this circuit. Jul 13 22:56:40.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. Discarding this circuit. Jul 13 22:56:41.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. Discarding this circuit. Jul 13 22:56:42.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. Discarding this circuit. Jul 14 01:58:43.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 1 day 18:00 hours, with 0 circuits open. I've sent 27.67 MB and received 111.14 MB. Jul 14 01:58:43.000 [notice] Average packaged cell fullness: 66.503%. TLS write overhead: 9% Tue Jul 14 07:30:39 MCDT 2015 [root@kabini1, /etc, 7:30:39am] 440 % -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 14:51:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDAD9A1288; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 14:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "www.dweimer.net", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BC01D2A; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 14:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.local (webmail [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t6EENxCx091290 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:24:00 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.dweimer.local (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t6EENxxj091289; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:23:59 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) X-Authentication-Warning: webmail.dweimer.local: www set sender to dweimer@dweimer.net using -f To: "O. Hartmann" Subject: Re: Howto create password hash for Windows server 2012 with freeBSD/Samba X-PHP-Script: www.dweimer.net/webmail/index.php for 71.86.41.122, 192.168.5.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:23:59 -0500 From: dweimer Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: dweimer.net Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: <20150714123446.3dfc808d@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> References: <20150714123446.3dfc808d@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> Message-ID: <2198a51d3af1d9546e6da2afc70690d9@dweimer.net> X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 14:51:51 -0000 On 07/14/2015 5:34 am, O. Hartmann wrote: > Scenario: > > A CURRENT box is to mount a share from a windows server 2012r2 machine > using > autofs(5). > > Setting up the SHAREs on Windows 2012 side and connecting to those > shares via > FreeBSD's mount_smbfs(8) manually went smoothly. > > But when it comes to automated mounting a Windows 2012 share via > automounter > (autofs) I fail. Autofs is setup using mount_smbfs with the "-N" > option. > regarding the documentation /etc/nsmb.conf is looked up for an > appropriate > setup and password=XXXXX field. Cleartext passwords do not work with M$ > server > 2012r2. Now I'm looking for a way to generate a "Hash" to put it > into /etc/nsmb.conf. > > Some websites tell the hash is NT MD4 hash. generating a md4 hash with > FreeBSD's onboard-tools is not possible, as far as i can see. crypt(3) > uses the > ability to generate a NT hash depending on the mode set for using the > appropriate hash algorithm, but I can not see how I could use/misuse > passwd or > any related onboard tool to emmit a NT hash. > > Please CC me via email (not subscribing the list) and help and > suggestions are > highly appreciated. > use: smbutil crypt -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 15:35:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BBA89A1EFA; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:35:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8283F3; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:35:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1ZF2Ef-003tNu-OY>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:35:09 +0200 Received: from x5ce121a1.dyn.telefonica.de ([92.225.33.161] helo=thor.walstatt.dynvpn.de) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1ZF2Ef-00231q-Gd>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:35:09 +0200 Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:35:04 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" To: dweimer Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Howto create password hash for Windows server 2012 with freeBSD/Samba Message-ID: <20150714173504.24b14c3b.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <2198a51d3af1d9546e6da2afc70690d9@dweimer.net> References: <20150714123446.3dfc808d@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> <2198a51d3af1d9546e6da2afc70690d9@dweimer.net> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.27; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/de7/RmtO2bZ9KyYqmcBmp8q"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-IP: 92.225.33.161 X-ZEDAT-Hint: A X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:35:13 -0000 --Sig_/de7/RmtO2bZ9KyYqmcBmp8q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:23:59 -0500 dweimer schrieb: > On 07/14/2015 5:34 am, O. Hartmann wrote: > > Scenario: > >=20 > > A CURRENT box is to mount a share from a windows server 2012r2 machine= =20 > > using > > autofs(5). > >=20 > > Setting up the SHAREs on Windows 2012 side and connecting to those=20 > > shares via > > FreeBSD's mount_smbfs(8) manually went smoothly. > >=20 > > But when it comes to automated mounting a Windows 2012 share via=20 > > automounter > > (autofs) I fail. Autofs is setup using mount_smbfs with the "-N"=20 > > option. > > regarding the documentation /etc/nsmb.conf is looked up for an=20 > > appropriate > > setup and password=3DXXXXX field. Cleartext passwords do not work with = M$=20 > > server > > 2012r2. Now I'm looking for a way to generate a "Hash" to put it > > into /etc/nsmb.conf. > >=20 > > Some websites tell the hash is NT MD4 hash. generating a md4 hash with > > FreeBSD's onboard-tools is not possible, as far as i can see. crypt(3)= =20 > > uses the > > ability to generate a NT hash depending on the mode set for using the > > appropriate hash algorithm, but I can not see how I could use/misuse=20 > > passwd or > > any related onboard tool to emmit a NT hash. > >=20 > > Please CC me via email (not subscribing the list) and help and=20 > > suggestions are > > highly appreciated. > >=20 >=20 > use: > smbutil crypt >=20 Thank you for responding. I did use smbutil crypt, placed the output in /etc/nsmb.conf (tagged: password=3D$$1XXXXXXXX) as suggested by the manpage. Manpage of nsmb.conf reports the user's private config file is ~/nsmb.conf,= but having that file, I get a "no cfg file found" error - it seems the manpage is wron= g. Having ~/.nsmbrc avoids that error. But anyway, only interactive mounting works. No automated one! --Sig_/de7/RmtO2bZ9KyYqmcBmp8q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVpSwoAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8+hAIAOO7B6fu6g49kDm0TmMBzfoQ d+U9XtKjFJJUwP9IkjWhxrhSLyuj1OWxpn9MqEWSdmB5SSH1LGpvHlsa9dWLtelf c3Gr3vl/Lj+mlWG6GN3JpK5DF25CYOe+o34n32iY/g9kOfPG/2ZDOZMM4NCOciXK Op0fFWfmkRtvrP7FLfmlPj5FEiMF4N9GzOTrXRupNrCBB3i7YCIim/Jx90hEPFsT nt2I+qDmPjD0WL+5tsnprTzULoAJvNnWFJfk/IKyaMV+aPWeAFPU+of13OiKQj9N Uxifs4n/KHuLhQZFy7UM/gxDrE1r/Ex6+4HN15nggkKjaqqrIrRL/fhK6TQ7p+Y= =wXSi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/de7/RmtO2bZ9KyYqmcBmp8q-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 15:53:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB619A133D for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:53:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "www.dweimer.net", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80D4A133 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:53:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.local (webmail [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t6EFrWOK095326 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:53:32 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.dweimer.local (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t6EFrWAc095325; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:53:32 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) X-Authentication-Warning: webmail.dweimer.local: www set sender to dweimer@dweimer.net using -f To: "O. Hartmann" Subject: Re: Howto create password hash for Windows server 2012 with freeBSD/Samba X-PHP-Script: www.dweimer.net/webmail/index.php for 71.86.41.122, 192.168.5.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:53:32 -0500 From: dweimer Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: dweimer.net Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: <20150714173504.24b14c3b.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <20150714123446.3dfc808d@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> <2198a51d3af1d9546e6da2afc70690d9@dweimer.net> <20150714173504.24b14c3b.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Message-ID: X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:53:34 -0000 On 07/14/2015 10:35 am, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:23:59 -0500 > dweimer schrieb: > >> On 07/14/2015 5:34 am, O. Hartmann wrote: >> > Scenario: >> > >> > A CURRENT box is to mount a share from a windows server 2012r2 machine >> > using >> > autofs(5). >> > >> > Setting up the SHAREs on Windows 2012 side and connecting to those >> > shares via >> > FreeBSD's mount_smbfs(8) manually went smoothly. >> > >> > But when it comes to automated mounting a Windows 2012 share via >> > automounter >> > (autofs) I fail. Autofs is setup using mount_smbfs with the "-N" >> > option. >> > regarding the documentation /etc/nsmb.conf is looked up for an >> > appropriate >> > setup and password=XXXXX field. Cleartext passwords do not work with M$ >> > server >> > 2012r2. Now I'm looking for a way to generate a "Hash" to put it >> > into /etc/nsmb.conf. >> > >> > Some websites tell the hash is NT MD4 hash. generating a md4 hash with >> > FreeBSD's onboard-tools is not possible, as far as i can see. crypt(3) >> > uses the >> > ability to generate a NT hash depending on the mode set for using the >> > appropriate hash algorithm, but I can not see how I could use/misuse >> > passwd or >> > any related onboard tool to emmit a NT hash. >> > >> > Please CC me via email (not subscribing the list) and help and >> > suggestions are >> > highly appreciated. >> > >> >> use: >> smbutil crypt >> > > Thank you for responding. > > I did use smbutil crypt, placed the output in /etc/nsmb.conf (tagged: > password=$$1XXXXXXXX) as suggested by the manpage. > > Manpage of nsmb.conf reports the user's private config file is > ~/nsmb.conf, but having > that file, I get a "no cfg file found" error - it seems the manpage is > wrong. > Having ~/.nsmbrc avoids that error. > > But anyway, only interactive mounting works. No automated one! I use /etc/nsmb.conf [WORKSTATION:DWEIMER] password=$$1... addr=192.168.5.66 then in /etc/fstab # Samba File Systems //dweimer@workstation/Music /smbfs/workstation/Music smbfs rw,late,-N 0 0 //dweimer@workstation/Documents /smbfs/workstation/Documents smbfs rw,late,-N 0 0 //dweimer@workstation/Downloads /smbfs/workstation/Downloads smbfs rw,late,-N 0 0 //dweimer@workstation/Pictures /smbfs/workstation/Pictures smbfs rw,late,-N 0 0 //dweimer@workstation/Videos /smbfs/workstation/Videos smbfs rw,late,-N 0 0 I haven't tried getting it to work under a regular user, but this works great with one exception, it makes booting take forever when it gets to the point it mounts these. Not sure why it takes so long, its fast to access the files when mounted. I have been using this setup for a couple of years to enable access via the Pydio web application on my server to my files from my laptop and iPhone if needed remotely. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 16:05:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B549A1647 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:05:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-f193.google.com (mail-ig0-f193.google.com [209.85.213.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F15D09F6 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:05:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: by igbqa2 with SMTP id qa2so1353237igb.0 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:05:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=references:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; bh=YjhqPFXPHotp6ZTONAEiAwAefp3ltfMtyfoSCg/gp9Y=; b=RLCFQQNijGBQNVffhpDt9wswUN+5w7F5afY8cQW9hPwzguJrDHOglCmPlyaYP5ciQ0 fZ7q5gvIr2kkpK+8yFj3IuusoC6WJ9JZq2azENuRdU8gLSKjBqYfSBw8UDiBrhaAI3aR NmdqLVha6lSyFzoQWshrMr4XnLdFvmGNQDyJvwlgoLwYstkYl4iuE/LYJ0AAtcfAHL4s LfUkB0uuZQjM/zXL7KYBtEb3+z3Jf1mMI1N/l3Kq8TsiK/pXF83RqoIrXua2LgIOIih6 E3xefEDXXsStKo0fSe8XwIOpllRsV4Mn4THK8v+oJTwhdM+w9KmWCRpxuN4IUMBN7zOn odsg== X-Received: by 10.107.137.154 with SMTP id t26mr53219463ioi.13.1436882152666; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 06:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WorkBox.Home.gmail.com (75-168-176-141.mpls.qwest.net. [75.168.176.141]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ji7sm1616352igb.2.2015.07.14.06.55.50 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 06:55:51 -0700 (PDT) References: <37E1F657-243D-4F8F-A563-0C17B344D1B9@omnigroup.com> From: Brandon J. Wandersee To: Wim Lewis Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Naming a locally-built version of a package In-reply-to: <37E1F657-243D-4F8F-A563-0C17B344D1B9@omnigroup.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 08:55:49 -0500 Message-ID: <86oajevo62.fsf@WorkBox.Home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:05:21 -0000 Wim Lewis writes: > Is there a particular recommended practice for naming a locally-built > package that is built with a local patch, or different configure > options, etc., so that it works well with the rest of the package > system, particularly dependencies and things? > > Ideally: let's say I'm building a custom version of Foo-1.3. I'd like to name it such that: > - Existing packages that require Foo will be satisfied by my patched Foo > - Local packages which require my patched Foo can specify a dependency on it > Less important but nice: > - pkg audit will still recognize my Foo as Foo and inform me of things I should know > - The system won't suggest to "upgrade" my Foo to a non-patched Foo of a later version > > Is this (or a subset) possible with pkgng? > If you're just build a small number of packages (maybe 5 or fewer), use `pkg lock`. If you're build lots of custom packages, set up a personal package repository. pkg(8) is capable of distinguishing between different builds of a package via a) origin, and b) custom build-time options--no need to change the name. -- ================================================================= :: Brandon Wandersee :: :: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com :: ================================================================== 'A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.' - Douglas Adams ================================================================== From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 16:05:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9125D9A1667 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:05:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x229.google.com (mail-ig0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C813A8C for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:05:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: by iggp10 with SMTP id p10so101736987igg.0 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:05:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fGUktXLv6Y5C1vX/wA39MA2TZoE673m2FZJM5HQjCYU=; b=COB54d4OS813+Seb/bjNBgYThO0ypY01hTy5GjrcQgx8vswhb0dTYvHk4iOpimQOZM JWVO9UOCFhdOIZr7BttxBLlJ6m9A4zXs5/5qJ3rKja+daSJ6v1hLcrUGdL444uJv29Mq iU0/mRtZSFO6TbPOune/nG2WCyLEHpo4hC6h3H5kXMwJN2zkXkU5cn9f+U7PBGioHlb0 7i9Z4wzcPpZK65YIHH46kcqvyFhyA7ZE32Dx2Vq2IyK3qP6BMLNkUo6XBVPIg2uLJRTR fNwX9Lff5ye68bGqcP6T8nP7A9rD0FOcaDmbAmg3sNk1nNRGXX1rO6RETG9woxT7MVYO ejNA== X-Received: by 10.50.40.42 with SMTP id u10mr15870210igk.71.1436889949959; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:05:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([50.243.6.59]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id o19sm8107135igs.18.2015.07.14.09.05.49 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:05:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55A5335C.9040907@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 10:05:48 -0600 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Another tor question References: <55A4FFF7.2020400@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <55A4FFF7.2020400@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:05:51 -0000 On 07/14/2015 06:25 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > > .... I am using tor with firefox to browse the web. Some sites seem to > detect & block this type of access. Sometimes, however, I seem to > slither through, usually 1st thing in the A.M. after my (cable-modem) > access has been offline all night & tor has dropped all of its > circuits (according to its log file). Is that in fact an accurate > analysis, i.e. I am browsing 'naked' until tor re-establishes circuits > ? System info: > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 7:31:25am] 551 % uname -a > FreeBSD kabini1.local 9.3-RELEASE-p13 FreeBSD 9.3-RELEASE-p13 #0: Tue > Apr 7 03:01:12 UTC 2015 > root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > [root@kabini1, /etc, 7:31:32am] 552 % > > tor-0.2.6.9, torsocks-2.0.0 > > From tor's log file: > > [root@kabini1, /etc, 7:26:59am] 440 % ( tail -20 /var/log/tor ; date ) > Jul 13 22:36:09.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. > Discarding this circuit. > Jul 13 22:42:30.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. > Discarding this circuit. > Jul 13 22:42:31.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. > Discarding this circuit. > Jul 13 22:42:32.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. > Discarding this circuit. > Jul 13 22:43:49.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. > Discarding this circuit. > Jul 13 22:48:54.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. > Discarding this circuit. > Jul 13 22:50:11.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. > Discarding this circuit. > Jul 13 22:50:12.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. > Discarding this circuit. > Jul 13 22:50:13.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. > Discarding this circuit. > Jul 13 22:50:14.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. > Discarding this circuit. > Jul 13 22:54:03.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. > Discarding this circuit. > Jul 13 22:54:04.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. > Discarding this circuit. > Jul 13 22:54:05.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. > Discarding this circuit. > Jul 13 22:56:38.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. > Discarding this circuit. > Jul 13 22:56:39.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. > Discarding this circuit. > Jul 13 22:56:40.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. > Discarding this circuit. > Jul 13 22:56:41.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. > Discarding this circuit. > Jul 13 22:56:42.000 [warn] Failed to find node for hop 0 of our path. > Discarding this circuit. > Jul 14 01:58:43.000 [notice] Heartbeat: Tor's uptime is 1 day 18:00 > hours, with 0 circuits open. I've sent 27.67 MB and received 111.14 MB. > Jul 14 01:58:43.000 [notice] Average packaged cell fullness: 66.503%. > TLS write overhead: 9% > Tue Jul 14 07:30:39 MCDT 2015 > [root@kabini1, /etc, 7:30:39am] 440 % > > You found a chink in tor's armor :) From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 16:40:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CD979A1CC2 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:40:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pki2.com) Received: from btw.pki2.com (btw.pki2.com [IPv6:2001:470:a:6fd::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60348CF8 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:40:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pki2.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by btw.pki2.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t6EGeTGw051871 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:40:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@pki2.com) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 btw.pki2.com t6EGeTGw051871 Authentication-Results: btw.pki2.com; dmarc=none header.from=pki2.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pki2.com; s=pki2; t=1436892029; bh=rJvt5+jDV4UM8ii3B7Ci/NIP4MhrrwqVGaO5FYAl9/s=; h=Subject:From:To:Date; z=Subject:=20What's=20the=20magic=20of=20linking=20against=20iconv= 20(clang/gcc5)?|From:=20Dennis=20Glatting=20|To: =20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Date:=20Tue,=2014=20Jul=202015=20 09:40:29=20-0700; b=aq0KVUi10aWmia7vflGV7ZCQ33KFHzjTXXadxVTqtbBbmFAqHHMFwEgLZkkPxGt0m 0SAog5kgAxYj8Th+ItBUAAxWmqPGHJIHMG/1YGmlPBKlM/siYm8TsVnrBnfleCbvha FyHtp/J3wgK+TTOx29EipTl11PGtCAJtkJsaoO2gpdLU3R7/8fx+dy79PqJmcdPILs 2Cp6RgLYBlQif65cjj6y45jU7j37ftAfxOW3gliNRdXHAQPeGXvFIJits/+KtacssA nIwqfw/aQN8ofExP0hcWZ9p6KH1e1xD2zPN9ZilC1vWfwLP7PTW+GhVlzpSu7WMyk8 C1PZxvMcGb6Pg== Message-ID: <1436892029.68808.8.camel@pki2.com> Subject: What's the magic of linking against iconv (clang/gcc5)? From: Dennis Glatting To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:40:29 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SoftwareMunitions-MailScanner-Information: Dennis Glatting X-SoftwareMunitions-MailScanner-ID: t6EGeTGw051871 X-SoftwareMunitions-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: freebsd@pki2.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:40:42 -0000 My system: root@Tasha# uname -a FreeBSD Tasha 10.2-BETA1 FreeBSD 10.2-BETA1 #0 r285434: Sun Jul 12 16:57:18 PDT 2015 root@Tasha:/disk-2/obj/disk-1/src/sys/SMUNI-FreeBSD10-amd64 amd64 I have a very simple program: #include #include int main( void ) { iconv_t fd = 0; iconv_close( fd ); return 0; } If I compile with clang, I have no trouble: root@Tasha# cc foo.c root@Tasha# However, if I compiler with gcc5: root@Tasha# gcc5 foo.c /tmp//ccDHDghd.o: In function `main': foo.c:(.text+0x18): undefined reference to `libiconv_close' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status According to iconv(3), I should link against c yet I get the same error: root@Tasha# gcc5 foo.c -lc /tmp//ccsKwlf3.o: In function `main': foo.c:(.text+0x18): undefined reference to `libiconv_close' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status I'm confused why this doesn't work and have searched through the system libraries. (I have verbose output below). I /only/ have a problem with iconv. There is some difference between these compilers that I do not understand. Clue please. (BTW, I'm compiling GNURadio 3.7.8git. There are two patches and everything compiles except where iconv is referenced.) root@Tasha# cc -v foo.c FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512 Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.2 Thread model: posix Selected GCC installation: "/usr/bin/cc" -cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.2 -emit-obj -mrelax-all -disable-free -disable-llvm-verifier -main-file-name foo.c -mrelocation-model static -mdisable-fp-elim -masm-verbose -mconstructor-aliases -munwind-tables -target-cpu x86-64 -v -resource-dir /usr/bin/../lib/clang/3.4.1 -fdebug-compilation-dir /lib -ferror-limit 19 -fmessage-length 80 -mstackrealign -fobjc-runtime=gnustep -fdiagnostics-show-option -fcolor-diagnostics -vectorize-slp -o /tmp/foo-2bbf11.o -x c foo.c clang -cc1 version 3.4.1 based upon LLVM 3.4.1 default target x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.2 ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/bin/../lib/clang/3.4.1/include" #include "..." search starts here: #include <...> search starts here: /usr/include/clang/3.4.1 /usr/include End of search list. "/usr/bin/ld" --eh-frame-hdr -dynamic-linker /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 --hash-style=both --enable-new-dtags -o a.out /usr/lib/crt1.o /usr/lib/crti.o /usr/lib/crtbegin.o -L/usr/lib /tmp/foo-2bbf11.o -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed -lc -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed /usr/lib/crtend.o /usr/lib/crtn.o root@Tasha# gcc5 -v foo.c -lc Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc5 COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/libexec/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2 Configured with: ./../gcc-5.1.0/configure --with-build-config=bootstrap-debug --disable-nls --enable-gnu-indirect-function --libdir=/usr/local/lib/gcc5 --libexecdir=/usr/local/libexec/gcc5 --program-suffix=5 --with-as=/usr/local/bin/as --with-gmp=/usr/local --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/local/lib/gcc5/include/c++/ --with-ld=/usr/local/bin/ld --with-pkgversion='FreeBSD Ports Collection' --with-system-zlib --with-ecj-jar=/usr/local/share/java/ecj-4.5.jar --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,java --prefix=/usr/local --localstatedir=/var --mandir=/usr/local/man --infodir=/usr/local/info/gcc5 --build=x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2 Thread model: posix gcc version 5.1.0 (FreeBSD Ports Collection) COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64' /usr/local/libexec/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0/cc1 -quiet -v foo.c -quiet -dumpbase foo.c -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -auxbase foo -version -o /tmp//ccIJPCLY.s GNU C11 (FreeBSD Ports Collection) version 5.1.0 (x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2) compiled by GNU C version 5.1.0, GMP version 5.1.3, MPFR version 3.1.2, MPC version 1.0.3 GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072 ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/lib/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0/../../../../../x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/include" #include "..." search starts here: #include <...> search starts here: /usr/local/lib/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0/include /usr/local/include /usr/local/lib/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0/include-fixed /usr/include End of search list. GNU C11 (FreeBSD Ports Collection) version 5.1.0 (x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2) compiled by GNU C version 5.1.0, GMP version 5.1.3, MPFR version 3.1.2, MPC version 1.0.3 GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072 Compiler executable checksum: d704dda7d1acf1756f63bafb76e30605 COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64' /usr/local/bin/as -v -o /tmp//cc2Z6z3x.o /tmp//ccIJPCLY.s GNU assembler version 2.25 (x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2) using BFD version (GNU Binutils) 2.25 COMPILER_PATH=/usr/local/libexec/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0/:/usr/local/libexec/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0/:/usr/local/libexec/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/:/usr/local/lib/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0/:/usr/local/lib/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/:/usr/local/lib/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0/../../../../../x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/bin/ LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/lib/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0/:/usr/local/lib/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0/../../../../../x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/lib/:/usr/local/lib/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0/../../../:/lib/:/usr/lib/ COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x86-64' /usr/local/libexec/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0/collect2 -plugin /usr/local/libexec/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0/liblto_plugin.so -plugin-opt=/usr/local/libexec/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0/lto-wrapper -plugin-opt=-fresolution=/tmp//ccMod0QF.res -plugin-opt=-pass-through=-lgcc -plugin-opt=-pass-through=-lgcc_s -plugin-opt=-pass-through=-lc -plugin-opt=-pass-through=-lgcc -plugin-opt=-pass-through=-lgcc_s --eh-frame-hdr -V -dynamic-linker /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 /usr/lib/crt1.o /usr/lib/crti.o /usr/local/lib/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0/crtbegin.o -L/usr/local/lib/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0 -L/usr/local/lib/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0/../../../../../x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/lib -L/usr/local/lib/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0/../../.. /tmp//cc2Z6z3x.o -lc -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed -lc -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed /usr/local/lib/gcc5/gcc/x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/5.1.0/crtend.o /usr/lib/crtn.o GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.25 Supported emulations: elf_x86_64_fbsd elf_i386_fbsd elf_x86_64 elf_i386 elf_l1om elf_l1om_fbsd elf_k1om elf_k1om_fbsd /tmp//cc2Z6z3x.o: In function `main': foo.c:(.text+0x18): undefined reference to `libiconv_close' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 18:04:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 034B29A125D for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:04:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay118.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay118.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F76FFD3 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:04:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=yz6z4UlqfYe1Iv9USMliYggvHmbgQ4ACOrhY3D/q6Wc= c=1 sm=2 a=IoZrpO97AAAA:8 a=FuVK2u3hnbUzN0jQfmcA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2CUBgA3TqVV/++YsFtbgxOBPcNIAoFLPBEBAQEBAQEBgQqEJAEBBDocIxALDgoJJQ8qHgYTiDIBzzsBAQEBAQUBAQEBHotMhQYHhCsBBJQyjAWBQYQYkxYmggwcgVU8MYJLAQEB Received: from 239.152-176-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.176.152.239]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 14 Jul 2015 20:03:49 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t6EI3kp6004875; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 20:03:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 20:03:45 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Dennis Glatting Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's the magic of linking against iconv (clang/gcc5)? Message-ID: <20150714200345.04354c5b@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <1436892029.68808.8.camel@pki2.com> References: <1436892029.68808.8.camel@pki2.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:04:59 -0000 On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:40:29 -0700 Dennis Glatting wrote: > My system: > > root@Tasha# uname -a > FreeBSD Tasha 10.2-BETA1 FreeBSD 10.2-BETA1 #0 r285434: Sun Jul 12 > 16:57:18 PDT 2015 > root@Tasha:/disk-2/obj/disk-1/src/sys/SMUNI-FreeBSD10-amd64 amd64 > > > I have a very simple program: > > #include > #include > > int > main( void ) { > > iconv_t fd = 0; > > iconv_close( fd ); > > return 0; > } > > > If I compile with clang, I have no trouble: > > root@Tasha# cc foo.c > root@Tasha# > > However, if I compiler with gcc5: > > root@Tasha# gcc5 foo.c > /tmp//ccDHDghd.o: In function `main': > foo.c:(.text+0x18): undefined reference to `libiconv_close' > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > According to iconv(3), I should link against c yet I get the same error: > > root@Tasha# gcc5 foo.c -lc > /tmp//ccsKwlf3.o: In function `main': > foo.c:(.text+0x18): undefined reference to `libiconv_close' > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > I'm confused why this doesn't work and have searched through the system > libraries. (I have verbose output below). I /only/ have a problem with > iconv. There is some difference between these compilers that I do not > understand. > > Clue please. The lang/gcc* ports always compile with -I/usr/local/include, so they end up including /usr/local/include/iconv.h which belongs to libiconv while clang includes /usr/include/iconv.h. So with gcc you either have to link with -liconv or compile with -DLIBICONV_PLUG which makes /usr/local/include/iconv.h behave like /usr/include/iconv.h. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 18:23:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10DA19A18A4 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:23:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wiml@omnigroup.com) Received: from omnigroup.com (omnigroup.com [198.151.161.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "omnigroup.com", Issuer "The Omni Group CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF481F5E for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:23:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wiml@omnigroup.com) Received: from machamp.omnigroup.com (machamp.omnigroup.com [198.151.161.135]) by omnigroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B42E2425DF2 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.4.3.119] (pfsense.omnigroup.com [198.151.161.131]) by machamp.omnigroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB67411B1733 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:20:06 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: Naming a locally-built version of a package From: Wim Lewis In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:23:53 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6C655B93-082B-4782-872B-F411BA722F85@omnigroup.com> References: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:23:56 -0000 On 14 Jul 2015, at 09:50 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > As I said above, usually people just use the original port name with > their own modifications, and it's mostly because of dependency = tracking > like this. That makes sense (and in my case is what I'd want to do anyway; my local = version of Foo *is* Foo, just with some local tweaks). Is $PORTREVISION a good place to note the presence and revision of my = local changes (e.g., as "o3" since only one letter is allowed)? Is pkg's = version-number-comparison behavior documented somewhere--- how it orders = alphabetics and what it does with the VERSION and REVISION parts of the = version string? > it is certainly possible to tell pkg(8) not to mess with locally = customized packages. See pkg-lock(8) That looks useful, thanks for the pointer! > The mechanism is not > entirely as smooth as we would like it to be, and pkg(8) should grow = the > intelligence to understand that replacing a package 'Foo with option > bar' with a package 'Foo without option bar' is something that should = be > avoided wherever possible. Would it be reasonable to treat local patches as options? That is, my = local variant of Foo-1.3_5 would still be named Foo-1.3_5.o3, but would = have the option SPIFFY_LOCAL_PATCH. I've noticed that pkg records the = build options of packages but it's not clear to me what it does with = that information (if anything; is this just there to support future = behavior that hasn't been implemented yet?). From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 18:31:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C169A1B0C for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:31:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AED194B for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:31:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from moby.local ([37.6.29.167]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MK4fR-1ZDhPM0oHV-001OUS; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 20:31:25 +0200 Message-ID: <55A55559.4070806@gmx.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:30:49 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon CC: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions" Subject: Re: tar: Damaged tar archive, Retrying... References: <55A3F7F2.3060400@gmx.com> <20150713225709.55553c98.freebsd@edvax.de> <55A44C50.70500@gmx.com> <20150714020959.bf3d8121.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20150714020959.bf3d8121.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:qxpW8xVCivJHWsSF2Th5SVjxoeF3cFUINO4RKGejq97wTcmcT1z FGy4VRInOHj2GJYbE+AO5ABXTUoK9aChATB6udwZviOZP2tLxf02HJvwuwyXrrx3MkyHQRh 0YQInzNMCtERuP7tUL1rqMwFFWSWjh4giNctHiH+4mCHHkY3sQ/jUA2kV7ggWTZ9leHQu1B 5oH+UBlsO8KUMdVwPsXwA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:kYJ8bE+f5M8=:ivQ9Bpa9wLxvUWygKAzxxO Ilya4XB9s8w87aSANu6QhqCtzQ0GKumtrmk57WDJ1zqE+1IpbbrcA0+Ziu7AQ4XnamS4RsJH1 5rEen+5/uC7zFzt4p06QALM647chcWi2NvSkfZjU3ZNbu9EBdrXYXT1seIKToBncd+y5cV5Vy pdbKeie5S7j2fNUYcU0hecQnzQlFLECJrZkUpjYlXMsokGsf6M5z/9M5hFuCsJSMFSQoZiPAP JBCxnU4dc/gvWbOfTEhdlynsffJzO09SAjwnUrRJBZc6SZTGu1nF872ZJCtNCnosGW0k5k5wy n+48Oe3lpkVkYoLRFqJniA9r6vL1pd5ZKb6tYNo8K11NsKeYjfabWfkRCcnT/rxn05HAQB6Ui eBJ2NosKqLne0bLzBASZZUzZ6BJe3RQBQQ+KDl/UK9YMjNDfD+NazWHzbPcgZHz+Crj85+7tL 4BGKCCPgQyXHDzxGFDqclwI57kS7R/hRsvQKPMK4YomJsP1SQvG+0c7m0rAiiEKuUvSvbyfe2 lyfea2lCXKZvYuCCMCx3LAUxMA9dLmwCFr3tf3f/eAVu9q//ajAmOn7ATCv3CP3BsErUCVsO1 hPmCaht0bVfTpos9E4qLK1LFTfwDpKmE25N/EfJOBq1GThF0LuARKqibNJ6otIR47veu2/zSq kmusObnhMRhWw9esjzBtcR/vD/lL0bvokMg67UDvq9g0mCkjGDxPcVjd5EfGQz+5mGsM= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:31:34 -0000 On 07/14/15 03:09, Polytropon wrote: > Is there a significant version mismatch between source and > target system? It shouldn't affect readability of tar archives > (simply because tar is _the_ universal archiving format > across operating systems), but maybe you can check that. > > No both machines are 10-STABLE. I just forwarded the issue to stable@ AKA further investigation ;) http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2015-July/082746.html From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 18:52:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78C79A10B8 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:52:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com (mail-oi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 975BDC92 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:52:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: by oihq81 with SMTP id q81so12921098oih.2 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:52:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=6N0u1MvGZ0s0SDoJPckaAqLXyyxZ7TD7jHnOLxhZI2o=; b=Ra9YHEej8lymlFjWZtjOw/ZASHSwjZgPjPuDVj1VpXnnxOJlzy4I6QOT/cCElhM5YJ GocG5ly+xMlrDVzYut3Vc7a64uHue8m3uX5M7c0f8yAcs404vAt1nQ/1mRkAQiZnhWMt Qb5nhFlhHMshtjwPTHi5EVTklo9B/BzukI0JhTJH7vjX53kQForSF8L5qbt+/8FHvmR2 JnEnJ7vUPv7fjjkFZRtgYrvyIbeIqg/aFnNPwJuX4V1QxRgtdo3la6mf1waGle8zFR0q wbcjGuerMBQsGVECCG8QrEmbjupS88DjeURAw0uLuCcQaoAqlmVW/770IhvnPx4rgk6H TVNA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.232.67 with SMTP id f64mr29713oih.63.1436899970475; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:52:50 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.8.142 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:52:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 14:52:50 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: efd4h4gjHqPdc1e00dZrIekW_L4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: buildworld failing with freebsd-update server From: Rick Miller To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:52:52 -0000 On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Rick Miller wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm attempting to build a freebsd-update distribution based on the > instructions for building a FreeBSD Update Server[1], but buildworld is > failing during buildworld world0 and world1. The distribution being built > is amd64 10.0-RELEASE on an amd64 10.0-RELEASE-p18 node. > > Signs of trouble first appears in init.sh's STDOUT while executing > buildworld() world0. It errors citing the following error with no further > detail. If the command is executed manually substituting valid values for > the variables, it outputs the jail command usage implying incorrect syntax. > > "jail: /usr/bin/env -i > PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/root/bin > RELP=10.0-RELEASE BRANCH_OVERRIDE= TARGET=amd64 TARGET_ARCH=amd64 /bin/sh > -e: failed" > > Both buildworld errors are hyperlinked below: > > world0: http://hostileadmin.com/logs/buildworld_world0_error.txt > world1: http://hostileadmin.com/logs/buildworld_world1_error.txt > > > [1] > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/freebsd-update-server/index.html > Resolved. Increasing total RAM from 16GB to 32GB proved successful in resolving the errors suggesting resources were constrained. -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 20:43:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2129A1596 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 20:43:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@odin.blazingdot.com) Received: from odin.blazingdot.com (odin.blazingdot.com [204.109.60.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4DD11B35 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 20:43:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcus@odin.blazingdot.com) Received: by odin.blazingdot.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 35E4F1320ED; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 13:43:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 13:43:05 -0700 From: Marcus Reid To: Nikos Vassiliadis Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions" Subject: Re: tar: Damaged tar archive, Retrying... Message-ID: <20150714204305.GA89782@blazingdot.com> References: <55A3F7F2.3060400@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55A3F7F2.3060400@gmx.com> X-Coffee-Level: nearly-fatal User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 20:43:06 -0000 On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 08:40:02PM +0300, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently using tar to copy some very files to another host and > got this: > > tar: Damaged tar archive > > tar: Retrying... > > tar: Damaged tar archive > > tar: Retrying... > > tar: Damaged tar archive > > tar: Retrying... > > tar: Damaged tar archive > > tar: Retrying... > > tar: Damaged tar archive > > The copy is done using tar|nc and nc|tar on the receiving host. > This looks like a bug and I wonder whether the copy is OK. I have submitted a bug report for a problem that causes this output. It's likely the same bug that you're encountering. The fix is upstream in libarchive, but in the meantime you can use gtar :( https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201506 Marcus From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 21:15:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CE289A1F54 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:15:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C28F414CD for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:15:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local ([192.168.100.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id t6ELF62Y049198 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:15:06 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t6ELF62Y049198 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t6ELF62Y049198; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host [192.168.100.2] claimed to be liminal.local Message-ID: <55A57BDA.50901@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:15:06 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Naming a locally-built version of a package References: <6C655B93-082B-4782-872B-F411BA722F85@omnigroup.com> In-Reply-To: <6C655B93-082B-4782-872B-F411BA722F85@omnigroup.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8p2RIqHHwCbwmRXC3QJsKMbDN1QEwqwN4" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 21:15:12 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --8p2RIqHHwCbwmRXC3QJsKMbDN1QEwqwN4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 14/07/2015 19:23, Wim Lewis wrote: > Is $PORTREVISION a good place to note the presence and revision of > my local changes (e.g., as "o3" since only one letter is allowed)? Is p= kg's > version-number-comparison behavior documented somewhere--- how it order= s > alphabetics and what it does with the VERSION and REVISION parts of the= > version string? You can test the ordering of two version strings using 'pkg version -t' Note however, if your modified version is Foo-1.0.0.o1 and an update is pulled in from upstream then the regular port version Foo-1.0.1 will supersede your locally modified version. You might find it more effective to use an epoch number instead: Foo-1.0.0;1 which will always sort higher than anything without the ';1' bit. Beware though that once you've added an epoch number you can never remove it. > Would it be reasonable to treat local patches as options? That is, my > local variant of Foo-1.3_5 would still be named Foo-1.3_5.o3, but > would have the option SPIFFY_LOCAL_PATCH. I've noticed that pkg > records the build options of packages but it's not clear to me what > it does with that information (if anything; is this just there to > support future behavior that hasn't been implemented yet?). pkg(8) tracks the option settings almost entirely for documentation purposes at the moment. They don't feature in what the solver is doing currently -- but keep watching this space. You can add your local changes as new options if you like, but I don't think it's going to have quite the effect you're hoping it will. There are a number of changes which are going to hit the ports in the nea= r future, particularly 'FLAVOURS' which you might find interesting. FLAVOURS is all about compiling certain ports several times with alternate dependency choices, eg. 'Foo with mysql' vs. 'Foo with postgresql' vs 'Foo with sqlite' Cheers, Matthew --8p2RIqHHwCbwmRXC3QJsKMbDN1QEwqwN4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVpXvaXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATCxwP/A8bQYTjI4QpX/o/IEu26Z4F 9i1EHpA9PrN3w+SrIMjR93sFq3/nRJq2W7DTihqzQKdSKyf0gHST2RcqNEPWJbM8 876CsT/A859kgII4efLmQ0lO+pfHOjtSQ63Nyt5BXqyFzRdxysXHqGI4phTKpqKZ WBsTI92+nbAl3t/WOXQq3iO/e7YPKGIjyd6XLCXdsEExojlj/aSYqsW/vMihMYf6 w7FSHYldtunEPAqH9oHKrkFaWd4rzTGgJhE0eyOPxhDV0JuE0iJv8xSKXYap0rBm aRwuEQj0t3wbzJQJq+lIVdSoxNbV5HAeuEpTq7BDg0xBOVk8XZo9eKGg0hjga/3F PzCgGZZGrL/QUkuN48TUooRmOdqAItnaxRAfxLv8rRn258zvBEKPym5l4kV/mlmo 2kfP0gDIGxa2gctGifAnsKrJKitLCFQoQpE6z+5OY8xSrrKdJugYL78gAnKZJ5oE PeKsyTPRYo77ecIbC93Xuz7Vx+3D/ATzaLwvoxMkHstFYNcuJ4rbxIkxTdOpjmA+ Q47R2ZAGjA4JsE91fk0z1DO6n56N7aQtAnWvYHJ3AVoRIv3ROsO3I5Zmkak9F7IG +e0/CWVIJPVjjU0hQJ90r8v+skgc2fY5BaajBfFiLo3nOQVlx1tb653Ld0jAw1Nf G2nSGXUb7mCXECq24eYn =KD/Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8p2RIqHHwCbwmRXC3QJsKMbDN1QEwqwN4-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 22:29:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89879A2315 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:29:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x22e.google.com (mail-ie0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D50B1964 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:29:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: by ieik3 with SMTP id k3so21630635iei.3 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:29:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NhcKJxWdGve9KQf3SGNUS1l0xI3sUFTX0PyHpwhilsQ=; b=mBjntUvuvBdOVB2ePpKNvHcfDZZPtZACuoxf7CNMAb/qvuD5z84MvN4mu61wGshtSv ApVwrxXpsTf/bkf20M1w1ya34lzGPa+6IwZObrKlr/02hrf6/ljw8dntP/ms1SHnJQyj /E4VeT5V3cXCoQgC/aw6nEPxDm5MWep+x1KwbZfDXLOJRMZR3c4KGWbbYoj6ERPy86Tu 0mS3aeLeYX2n2xZu6hujPRSnBX52UsNlEs9y+dNM45Rskn3+CfKf5uaSbHs4k5cqx23o 4aXbdGWASYHrkg1nK3xlJzmg9wWtV/YBd1A4cIx8TzVCi3VJgzKPWYJKQ5wHC08hsHRW oYSg== X-Received: by 10.107.153.66 with SMTP id b63mr1067556ioe.101.1436912970972; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:29:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([50.243.6.59]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id h138sm1499690ioe.2.2015.07.14.15.29.29 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:29:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55A58D3A.1070600@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:29:14 -0600 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Users Subject: Snowden, NSA spying, hard drive malware ... what we need is a UN privacy watchdog! Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:29:31 -0000 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/03/04/eff_un_human_rights/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 22:33:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09449A2450 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:33:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CE3C1DA0 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:33:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: by igvi1 with SMTP id i1so64862678igv.1 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:33:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hpXjx94/p3QOx5o2xG6EnX+W68I/k0lZY/0ZCXnF4OE=; b=dKx9cC1yALqVfnvEiaz7Xfg6oV8aaHJaIZoPfO4bOWfekF5/MRXGM7qoLVtsOcSv+7 LyvBY6G8Zsy1YnwxdoyMeem771eGSfqITjqL69caCJmXVgZk+gnt9hGhOiREjzigWQEB Decwuf5P93yUax/rdRzFrxuAwEnosvEY1Mt0PvCc3brbTyyX8ekQO8q5qh0TyDRxT1TQ 06z43qiu/M437TsKorBTA/v8NOHGRqxwUNacgMbUR/QVOuUv27D4gbGjW2DfyuesJJS+ C1u/UYIPiN2HtNjw+8vfC2W9N4O25qF8sXyCorOJi0zw4xigMB4D7RVqxUqbP3uQt78k KFug== X-Received: by 10.107.160.141 with SMTP id j135mr1063894ioe.43.1436913191851; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:33:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([50.243.6.59]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id a139sm1507626ioa.14.2015.07.14.15.33.10 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:33:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55A58E26.7060207@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:33:10 -0600 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Users Subject: SHA-1 crypto hash retirement fraught with problems Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:33:12 -0000 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/04/30/sha_2_migration_headaches/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 22:34:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A959A24FE for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:34:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 893AF1F5F for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:34:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-207-98-175-216.knology.net [207.98.175.216] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t6EMYEvc008248 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:34:14 -0500 Message-ID: <55A58E65.9050000@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:40:28 -0453 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Naming a locally-built version of a package References: <6C655B93-082B-4782-872B-F411BA722F85@omnigroup.com> <55A57BDA.50901@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <55A57BDA.50901@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:34:21 -0000 On 07/14/15 16:21, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 14/07/2015 19:23, Wim Lewis wrote: > >> Is $PORTREVISION a good place to note the presence and revision of >> my local changes (e.g., as "o3" since only one letter is allowed)? Is pkg's >> version-number-comparison behavior documented somewhere--- how it orders >> alphabetics and what it does with the VERSION and REVISION parts of the >> version string? > You can test the ordering of two version strings using 'pkg version -t' > > Note however, if your modified version is Foo-1.0.0.o1 and an update is > pulled in from upstream then the regular port version Foo-1.0.1 will > supersede your locally modified version. You might find it more > effective to use an epoch number instead: Foo-1.0.0;1 which will always > sort higher than anything without the ';1' bit. Beware though that once > you've added an epoch number you can never remove it. > >> Would it be reasonable to treat local patches as options? That is, my >> local variant of Foo-1.3_5 would still be named Foo-1.3_5.o3, but >> would have the option SPIFFY_LOCAL_PATCH. I've noticed that pkg >> records the build options of packages but it's not clear to me what >> it does with that information (if anything; is this just there to >> support future behavior that hasn't been implemented yet?). > pkg(8) tracks the option settings almost entirely for documentation > purposes at the moment. They don't feature in what the solver is doing > currently -- but keep watching this space. You can add your local > changes as new options if you like, but I don't think it's going to have > quite the effect you're hoping it will. Hmmmm .... If it is indeed aware of pkg options, could it decide to favor pkg's w/ other-than-std. options, on the assumption that the user was locally overriding something on his/her own judgment ? $0.02, no more, no less .... > > There are a number of changes which are going to hit the ports in the near > future, particularly 'FLAVOURS' which you might find interesting. > FLAVOURS is all about compiling certain ports several times with > alternate dependency choices, eg. 'Foo with mysql' vs. 'Foo with > postgresql' vs 'Foo with sqlite' > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 22:48:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8C29A293B for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:48:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x22f.google.com (mail-ie0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43F2F115B for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:48:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: by iebmu5 with SMTP id mu5so21673005ieb.1 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:48:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=yRvIU3dilCcwgz1JxF1G0TKbkVkL5eEA5l96AO/X6A8=; b=WckfsBWFQnuROOmCkE3VppNhsXMe0941NrIwLicMyM/BwEOiQbE/GP223kqxBWp1GG qnXYj9b/F1b0NZPa4x8sjqT0CRoAAgYNlF9scAwP/+PpFv3kXT2HcdK8meGYsh8ay48Y ncv2Hw6XwyKdoXdArj2MNmYh5N9nWfJJqqxRx8Rm27rJLvAG3awJF3fFto0fyd2aSUWz x9pE1mgjc1L61mkNAd6SalH399MZNfnoYkpC89QNIGE1iAX29kd/impekXEEcTJ9THx7 7fJ2kxUep+4KE8mD6AfrgQS2JgbOKY5/P1OPcozdkuC8zP/CnCoyHO5z5+m5BGMrL+xp OYOw== X-Received: by 10.50.17.104 with SMTP id n8mr22570347igd.21.1436914101712; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:48:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([50.243.6.59]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m193sm1529621iom.19.2015.07.14.15.48.20 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:48:21 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55A591B1.6000507@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:48:17 -0600 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lowell Gilbert , FreeBSD Users Subject: Re: Snowden, NSA spying, hard drive malware ... what we need is a UN privacy watchdog! References: <55A58D3A.1070600@gmail.com> <44vbdmxsxc.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> In-Reply-To: <44vbdmxsxc.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:48:22 -0000 Mr. Lowell, It is YOU who is utterly RUDE!!! You should unsubscribe, or someone should unsubscribe you and ban you from the list. Hard Drive Malware is infecting all OS'es, and it is of UTMOST importance, not only to FBSD users/developers, but ALL OS'es and their users. On 07/14/2015 04:42 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Spamming is rude. > Please stop. > > If you want to discuss this stuff with FreeBSD users, try the -chat list. > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 22:58:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7AE99A2B23 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:58:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from radel.com (fly.radel.com [70.184.242.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "*.radel.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DABB1BC7 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:58:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) X-CGP-ClamAV-Result: CLEAN X-VirusScanner: Niversoft's CGPClamav Helper v1.18.7 (ClamAV engine v0.98.7) Received: from [2001:470:880a:4389:a409:da84:c4ce:4e1a] (account jon@radel.com HELO gravenstein.local) by radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.2 _community_) with ESMTPSA id 822913 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:57:53 +0000 Subject: Re: Snowden, NSA spying, hard drive malware ... what we need is a UN privacy watchdog! To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <55A58D3A.1070600@gmail.com> <44vbdmxsxc.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <55A591B1.6000507@gmail.com> From: Jon Radel Message-ID: <55A593F1.2000307@radel.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:57:53 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55A591B1.6000507@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms060604010206010000020900" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:58:03 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms060604010206010000020900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 7/14/15 6:48 PM, jd1008 wrote: > It is YOU who is utterly RUDE!!! IMHO, you're way ahead in the rudeness game at this point. Forwarding=20 private correspondence to the list is iffy at best. > Hard Drive Malware is infecting all OS'es, and it is of UTMOST > importance, not only to FBSD users/developers, but ALL OS'es > and their users. Forwarding links to articles on The Register is somewhat off-topic for=20 the FreeBSD list, and you certainly didn't add any value. What, you=20 think we don't know about The Register or aren't capable of deciding=20 whether to keep up with their articles all by ourselves? How rude. --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms060604010206010000020900 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExDzANBglghkgBZQMEAgEFADCABgkqhkiG9w0BBwEAAKCC Cq8wggSvMIIDl6ADAgECAhEA4CPLFRKDU4mtYW56VGdrITANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFADBvMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJTRTEUMBIGA1UEChMLQWRkVHJ1c3QgQUIxJjAkBgNVBAsTHUFkZFRydXN0IEV4 dGVybmFsIFRUUCBOZXR3b3JrMSIwIAYDVQQDExlBZGRUcnVzdCBFeHRlcm5hbCBDQSBSb290 MB4XDTE0MTIyMjAwMDAwMFoXDTIwMDUzMDEwNDgzOFowgZsxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYD VQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNP TU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMUEwPwYDVQQDEzhDT01PRE8gU0hBLTI1NiBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVu dGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQTCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCC AQoCggEBAImxDdp6UxlOcFIdvFamBia3uEngludRq/HwWhNJFaO0jBtgvHpRQqd5jKQi3xdh TpHVdiMKFNNKAn+2HQmAbqUEPdm6uxb+oYepLkNSQxZ8rzJQyKZPWukI2M+TJZx7iOgwZOak +FaA/SokFDMXmaxE5WmLo0YGS8Iz1OlAnwawsayTQLm1CJM6nCpToxDbPSBhPFUDjtlOdiUC ISn6o3xxdk/u4V+B6ftUgNvDezVSt4TeIj0sMC0xf1m9UjewM2ktQ+v61qXxl3dnUYzZ7ifr vKUHOHaMpKk4/9+M9QOsSb7K93OZOg8yq5yVOhM9DkY6V3RhUL7GQD/L5OKfoiECAwEAAaOC ARcwggETMB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFK29mHo0tCb3+sQmVO8DveAky1QaMB0GA1UdDgQWBBSSYWuC 4aKgqk/sZ/HCo/e0gADB7DAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAYYwEgYDVR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADAd BgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUHAwQwEQYDVR0gBAowCDAGBgRVHSAAMEQGA1Ud HwQ9MDswOaA3oDWGM2h0dHA6Ly9jcmwudXNlcnRydXN0LmNvbS9BZGRUcnVzdEV4dGVybmFs Q0FSb290LmNybDA1BggrBgEFBQcBAQQpMCcwJQYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGWh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnVz ZXJ0cnVzdC5jb20wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQADggEBABsqbqxVwTqriMXY7c1V86prYSvACRAj mQ/FZmpvsfW0tXdeDwJhAN99Bf4Ss6SAgAD8+x1banICCkG8BbrBWNUmwurVTYT7/oKYz1gb 4yJjnFL4uwU2q31Ypd6rO2Pl2tVz7+zg+3vio//wQiOcyraNTT7kSxgDsqgt1Ni7QkuQaYUQ 26Y3NOh74AEQpZzKOsefT4g0bopl0BqKu6ncyso20fT8wmQpNa/WsadxEdIDQ7GPPprsnjJT 9HaSyoY0B7ksyuYcStiZDcGG4pCS+1pCaiMhEOllx/XVu37qjIUgAmLq0ToHLFnFmTPyOInl tukWeh95FPZKEBom+nyK+5swggX4MIIE4KADAgECAhBzVOU8fWu0zQ1gaQ38zgEbMA0GCSqG SIb3DQEBCwUAMIGbMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3JlYXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVy MRAwDgYDVQQHEwdTYWxmb3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0EgTGltaXRlZDFBMD8GA1UE AxM4Q09NT0RPIFNIQS0yNTYgQ2xpZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBTZWN1cmUgRW1h aWwgQ0EwHhcNMTUwMzMwMDAwMDAwWhcNMTgwMzI5MjM1OTU5WjCB+jELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMx DjAMBgNVBBETBTIyMTUwMQswCQYDVQQIEwJWQTEUMBIGA1UEBxMLU3ByaW5nZmllbGQxGjAY BgNVBAkTETY5MTcgUmlkZ2V3YXkgRHIuMRUwEwYDVQQKEwxKb24gVC4gUmFkZWwxMjAwBgNV BAsTKUlzc3VlZCB0aHJvdWdoIEpvbiBULiBSYWRlbCBFLVBLSSBNYW5hZ2VyMR8wHQYDVQQL ExZDb3Jwb3JhdGUgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsMRIwEAYDVQQDEwlKb24gUmFkZWwxHDAaBgkqhkiG 9w0BCQEWDWpvbkByYWRlbC5jb20wggEiMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4IBDwAwggEKAoIBAQDe 1Rth9hbQqaODn++C5dVAQH9nM2VH3oPazZufOwmIG2SXI/v3PuemcQQ3JkhmpQ06gYszyXbk TCLsqvEfalYj81jdt/K5lT4aVdj0LfJIWyTcU95V2rsCuHsSvn/PnIcsEtXg53rCtqS4EOtJ 9u3rY2hP8YCiyz1yY3mn4nKJs93MHG4AkXYuVpzfaIADETcVrA+razvXEfnDJXXDZZ9ZuuV1 06yIovOvhYWSlaVu8nrSHJjXFZI2IXwgIeVBoMih3yu6LLj14I/YdZ0rIA8K+UNB+NW6Ri3u wHXBbr4jh3ZqkrqIVUrf1VeybhdrJcdqXdMNHjKDSlCoaxYRbLy1AgMBAAGjggHVMIIB0TAf BgNVHSMEGDAWgBSSYWuC4aKgqk/sZ/HCo/e0gADB7DAdBgNVHQ4EFgQUz9YB10WEfBNHskRw o/0vh8qaQuwwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgWgMAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwHQYDVR0lBBYwFAYIKwYB BQUHAwQGCCsGAQUFBwMCMEYGA1UdIAQ/MD0wOwYMKwYBBAGyMQECAQMFMCswKQYIKwYBBQUH AgEWHWh0dHBzOi8vc2VjdXJlLmNvbW9kby5uZXQvQ1BTMF0GA1UdHwRWMFQwUqBQoE6GTGh0 dHA6Ly9jcmwuY29tb2RvY2EuY29tL0NPTU9ET1NIQTI1NkNsaWVudEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9u YW5kU2VjdXJlRW1haWxDQS5jcmwwgZAGCCsGAQUFBwEBBIGDMIGAMFgGCCsGAQUFBzAChkxo dHRwOi8vY3J0LmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbS9DT01PRE9TSEEyNTZDbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlv bmFuZFNlY3VyZUVtYWlsQ0EuY3J0MCQGCCsGAQUFBzABhhhodHRwOi8vb2NzcC5jb21vZG9j YS5jb20wGAYDVR0RBBEwD4ENam9uQHJhZGVsLmNvbTANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQsFAAOCAQEAS1Pe +gBgP+SQ/a5I5e7zX0Rg0DhH378LHlZixJgS6LfCPL2edKMUQi3Th9GXfLjdeyeWuMWoz925 ZzBHcPwkBeH+iM/AEhu0Dhi0kop/p66g9tEPJUZ/KDsqxddNDrD0Typn3/33pHTjJEDqydzA gwB0Nn8blpMbqSwT+j8wuPakfLsj1cSDzXrTLLsmIQB7auAyaYXdWyW8Yqw336rLUCvjOUfn qOOyjVsieTw/0PLoOHJaGyez+VtV4eyi6p1SNiX32A+fvxBMzKQLCokE43cXItc9Okzq//f2 fuvGp17r8mpm4OjjM5E2kwsg9bBPUBMR4/sxosKVLn0o9rxlozGCBEEwggQ9AgEBMIGwMIGb MQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3JlYXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVyMRAwDgYDVQQHEwdT YWxmb3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0EgTGltaXRlZDFBMD8GA1UEAxM4Q09NT0RPIFNI QS0yNTYgQ2xpZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBTZWN1cmUgRW1haWwgQ0ECEHNU5Tx9 a7TNDWBpDfzOARswDQYJYIZIAWUDBAIBBQCgggJhMBgGCSqGSIb3DQEJAzELBgkqhkiG9w0B BwEwHAYJKoZIhvcNAQkFMQ8XDTE1MDcxNDIyNTc1M1owLwYJKoZIhvcNAQkEMSIEIJN6zz++ dXGHSlJfUka8N5u7mZiTW+Q/OcEbQuCkfIsXMGwGCSqGSIb3DQEJDzFfMF0wCwYJYIZIAWUD BAEqMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBAjAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcN AwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgwgcEGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGBszCBsDCBmzEL MAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2Fs Zm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09NT0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxQTA/BgNVBAMTOENPTU9ETyBTSEEt MjU2IENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBAhBzVOU8fWu0 zQ1gaQ38zgEbMIHDBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGBs6CBsDCBmzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNV BAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMHU2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09N T0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxQTA/BgNVBAMTOENPTU9ETyBTSEEtMjU2IENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50 aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBAhBzVOU8fWu0zQ1gaQ38zgEbMA0GCSqGSIb3 DQEBAQUABIIBADElQIBEsUoZK4YKwelWi4lOxwt1JUETWJ6Afr9IwHhA7tcjBeu+yrEBMwrQ KmlWmLAtME64+MvB0E3KfV0aC2TJDKAijZE9hm/a+KdhUukLSO34inc6HO2mK0oFU4haAv2I hImI9mVRTcHR9TYQLRAGW+WdVAHQmPXy8rcgjnJzrLxtIJuMUmMS6ImujnQrW/H6XZQDdlOv VXsbMmByy/Zt8cbF82fu0v4EyUrnthv6BggbWkBq+9K25V8lzGNH8K+9UHVtl4dB1HTVQngF lMJOARgg4xD4ynNvBMsEDEBuH0YOXIZY5ocEy1v3NiQ3mTEOnbmjZo9vE09XoQYQvh4AAAAA AAA= --------------ms060604010206010000020900-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 22:59:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5189D9A2D27 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:59:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x22b.google.com (mail-ie0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DF381CA4 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:59:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: by ieik3 with SMTP id k3so22004648iei.3 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:59:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3rce56QtrKb8tpF7W5ZjLL/X67NuTjqnrJJ1afFz5fA=; b=ASuJTEOMm2bdw8aqMSv5nk8AOt9Ba1E1bqLzv35QpKGRHgRJ0EBdNvmwiAh5uWGgz1 9VwD7sHi2B2TLSAUH9gygVeRTe3YJsB+euxEy/U3pMl9uUC2SWyURkJLiP4vzcLBYww2 ixsSNGEfnYqTKnGwlaJAEo3K1XD1bM5f+HFMYbBDXblri8KoYAXcfV9KwsIqKuiLoJIm HqXVaah1HYMNOpC8QcHikwCB0UvHB+ERMezc9YmIYbtILrkm30ALKcq0Hmmh3R1gJPpU FB5KYigwJI7qrtUCWmpSZXKEbP5AvemZYnOINUC0/CM80GPZeEucs+f/LOl7QcN4uxnF Gs+A== X-Received: by 10.107.164.168 with SMTP id d40mr1228256ioj.130.1436914771465; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:59:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([50.243.6.59]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l62sm1534808iol.36.2015.07.14.15.59.30 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 15:59:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55A59451.6030900@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:59:29 -0600 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Users Subject: another NSA leak: Network security code appears on GitHub Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 22:59:32 -0000 http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/09/nsa_network_security_code_leaks_onto_github/ So, who on FBSD dev team is scanning the kernel, compilers, C/C++ libraries, application and app libraries for security ? I do not think anyone is. It is an absolutely daunting task. It is the state of the world today. So incredibly unfortunate. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 23:02:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BC79A2E76 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:02:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x229.google.com (mail-ig0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D2491F87 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:02:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: by igvi1 with SMTP id i1so65234900igv.1 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:02:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YYzZz3uvihQILVeWCcD2d6Qh7L5TEcvG+4BiNr92xnQ=; b=M/ys4SPOJphLXFZ8wTiLmZzU7p/p5ZL8wLz9BzKpg1fnSFCgUpbSmfX55Ca0Fb6+GN kDKe/INrOjDgF6/jifYGjho9cE2uny2YjivKoSVIH1o/gvXFaDS1j3Do0n4G7skTtCIy 1urn9p611BjbrXoHEVpxK+rhZ5nVpdoTAmN85OWgHEtpMAyal3BqvP67AM1+9WT3X1iT gcYIbWlfVzrGo4nB0yYRitLgUdaEr/jzclNEarNqwDFs4gGjXGYYP0SpYGTwWGq+X1xL 28YUlBnDEaGW0E9zdmsGqMWT4rUfw+XYLGsU0mfQXzD+J6z5kjLOEZX7ULbyVdvIUbpy rUtw== X-Received: by 10.50.171.228 with SMTP id ax4mr16617956igc.32.1436914926976; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:02:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([50.243.6.59]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id kk9sm8843627igb.7.2015.07.14.16.02.06 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:02:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55A594ED.3030005@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:02:05 -0600 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Snowden, NSA spying, hard drive malware ... what we need is a UN privacy watchdog! References: <55A58D3A.1070600@gmail.com> <44vbdmxsxc.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <55A591B1.6000507@gmail.com> <55A593F1.2000307@radel.com> In-Reply-To: <55A593F1.2000307@radel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:02:07 -0000 You are voicing a mere opinion of someone who thinks he represents everyone else on this list, that no one else wants to know about such important issues. On 07/14/2015 04:57 PM, Jon Radel wrote: > On 7/14/15 6:48 PM, jd1008 wrote: >> It is YOU who is utterly RUDE!!! > IMHO, you're way ahead in the rudeness game at this point. Forwarding > private correspondence to the list is iffy at best. >> Hard Drive Malware is infecting all OS'es, and it is of UTMOST >> importance, not only to FBSD users/developers, but ALL OS'es >> and their users. > Forwarding links to articles on The Register is somewhat off-topic for > the FreeBSD list, and you certainly didn't add any value. What, you > think we don't know about The Register or aren't capable of deciding > whether to keep up with their articles all by ourselves? How rude. > > --Jon Radel > jon@radel.com > > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jul 14 23:52:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C04B9A1944 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:52:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pki2.com) Received: from btw.pki2.com (btw.pki2.com [IPv6:2001:470:a:6fd::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC8851925; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:52:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pki2.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by btw.pki2.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t6ENqZMA018964; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:52:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@pki2.com) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 btw.pki2.com t6ENqZMA018964 Authentication-Results: btw.pki2.com; dmarc=none header.from=pki2.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=pki2.com; s=pki2; t=1436917955; bh=11gLMzwZr/9pbYIwFHhj3FN0mRgVkcLls1WZ9kSiJ+o=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; z=Subject:=20Re:=20What's=20the=20magic=20of=20linking=20against=20 iconv=20(clang/gcc5)?|From:=20Dennis=20Glatting=20|To:=20Tijl=20Coosemans=20|Cc:=20freebsd-quest ions@freebsd.org|Date:=20Tue,=2014=20Jul=202015=2016:52:35=20-0700 |In-Reply-To:=20<20150714200345.04354c5b@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.o rg>|References:=20<1436892029.68808.8.camel@pki2.com>=0D=0A=09=20< 20150714200345.04354c5b@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>; b=HWxyewqdSszImx/BktfqBcZ9R5WM+rGDDFJzU0OYpIu6Zpmad2+LbJs4pRJFPy0Cq zPnECqwkld59WrXfjYkwfPDqU8dFnZ+DKtXRUY3f/XmFt8BkCIIb7CU0WVfQ1Al+EI aT06pynj04cZQaXqM7y8pG2HZN1Y4IoWOY8efCRPyzMzDTQpskgt+NrB7NcKMvX2zX 23J14JSD0gpRQibuIGrHjE4MlaDMjane51kkpEMQqsRC9uX31mZZdkPBEPIzkW3iOP ADG9cy9Mhe3VnIwJ+A2jQdLDMZxZmBcW+/zC7lO4+YsgjrlWaeANbwKz8YWBnDzPFT 12+3Ae8KhD3Hg== Message-ID: <1436917955.52012.0.camel@pki2.com> Subject: Re: What's the magic of linking against iconv (clang/gcc5)? From: Dennis Glatting To: Tijl Coosemans Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 16:52:35 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20150714200345.04354c5b@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> References: <1436892029.68808.8.camel@pki2.com> <20150714200345.04354c5b@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SoftwareMunitions-MailScanner-Information: Dennis Glatting X-SoftwareMunitions-MailScanner-ID: t6ENqZMA018964 X-SoftwareMunitions-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: freebsd@pki2.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:52:48 -0000 Thanks. I'll give it a shot. On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 20:03 +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 09:40:29 -0700 Dennis Glatting wrote: > > My system: > > > > root@Tasha# uname -a > > FreeBSD Tasha 10.2-BETA1 FreeBSD 10.2-BETA1 #0 r285434: Sun Jul 12 > > 16:57:18 PDT 2015 > > root@Tasha:/disk-2/obj/disk-1/src/sys/SMUNI-FreeBSD10-amd64 amd64 > > > > > > I have a very simple program: > > > > #include > > #include > > > > int > > main( void ) { > > > > iconv_t fd = 0; > > > > iconv_close( fd ); > > > > return 0; > > } > > > > > > If I compile with clang, I have no trouble: > > > > root@Tasha# cc foo.c > > root@Tasha# > > > > However, if I compiler with gcc5: > > > > root@Tasha# gcc5 foo.c > > /tmp//ccDHDghd.o: In function `main': > > foo.c:(.text+0x18): undefined reference to `libiconv_close' > > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > > > According to iconv(3), I should link against c yet I get the same error: > > > > root@Tasha# gcc5 foo.c -lc > > /tmp//ccsKwlf3.o: In function `main': > > foo.c:(.text+0x18): undefined reference to `libiconv_close' > > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > > > > I'm confused why this doesn't work and have searched through the system > > libraries. (I have verbose output below). I /only/ have a problem with > > iconv. There is some difference between these compilers that I do not > > understand. > > > > Clue please. > > The lang/gcc* ports always compile with -I/usr/local/include, so they > end up including /usr/local/include/iconv.h which belongs to libiconv > while clang includes /usr/include/iconv.h. So with gcc you either > have to link with -liconv or compile with -DLIBICONV_PLUG which makes > /usr/local/include/iconv.h behave like /usr/include/iconv.h. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 15 00:20:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5242799C186 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:20:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@thehowies.com) Received: from remote.thehowies.com (50-197-91-217-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.197.91.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "remote.thehowies.com", Issuer "RapidSSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DF1A167F for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:20:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@thehowies.com) Received: from PRIMARY.thehowies.local ([fe80::497b:de8e:1045:4c2a]) by PRIMARY.thehowies.local ([fe80::497b:de8e:1045:4c2a%24]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:19:19 -0700 From: John Howie To: jd1008 CC: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Snowden, NSA spying, hard drive malware ... what we need is a UN privacy watchdog! Thread-Topic: Snowden, NSA spying, hard drive malware ... what we need is a UN privacy watchdog! Thread-Index: AQHQvoSZ/85Va4HBHUG4nzPp+3C5Sp3bkXEXgAB35oCAAAEsgP//oDyg Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:19:19 +0000 Message-ID: References: <55A58D3A.1070600@gmail.com> <44vbdmxsxc.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <55A591B1.6000507@gmail.com> <55A593F1.2000307@radel.com>,<55A594ED.3030005@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <55A594ED.3030005@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:20:28 -0000 Jon represents me. jd1008, this is off-topic and you broke a rule about pos= ting private correspondence. Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 14, 2015, at 19:02, jd1008 wrote: >=20 > You are voicing a mere opinion of someone who thinks he represents > everyone else on this list, that no one else wants to know about such > important issues. >=20 >=20 >> On 07/14/2015 04:57 PM, Jon Radel wrote: >>> On 7/14/15 6:48 PM, jd1008 wrote: >>> It is YOU who is utterly RUDE!!! >> IMHO, you're way ahead in the rudeness game at this point. Forwarding pr= ivate correspondence to the list is iffy at best. >>> Hard Drive Malware is infecting all OS'es, and it is of UTMOST >>> importance, not only to FBSD users/developers, but ALL OS'es >>> and their users. >> Forwarding links to articles on The Register is somewhat off-topic for t= he FreeBSD list, and you certainly didn't add any value. What, you think we= don't know about The Register or aren't capable of deciding whether to kee= p up with their articles all by ourselves? How rude. >>=20 >> --Jon Radel >> jon@radel.com >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 15 03:18:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09669A2EC0 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:18:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6339726C3 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:18:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFDDf-0003iC-5e for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 05:18:51 +0200 Received: from vps.jonz.net ([216.17.42.59]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 05:18:51 +0200 Received: from SPAM_TRAP_gmane by vps.jonz.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 05:18:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jonesy Subject: Re: Snowden, NSA spying, hard drive malware ... what we need is a UN privacy watchdog! Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:18:46 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 5 Message-ID: References: <55A58D3A.1070600@gmail.com> <44vbdmxsxc.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <55A591B1.6000507@gmail.com> <55A593F1.2000307@radel.com> <55A594ED.3030005@gmail.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: vps.jonz.net User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:18:55 -0000 On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:19:19 +0000, John Howie wrote: > Jon represents me. jd1008, this is off-topic and > you broke a rule about posting private correspondence. Yup. WAY over the top. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 15 03:26:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418CA99B157 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:26:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from liangshengjun@huawei.com) Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.65]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "myname.my.domain", Issuer "www.mirapoint.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CD892B43 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:26:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from liangshengjun@huawei.com) Received: from 172.24.2.119 (EHLO SZXEMI403-HUB.china.huawei.com) ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id COT13417; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:25:31 +0800 (CST) Received: from SZXEMI502-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.98]) by SZXEMI403-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.83.65.55]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:25:20 +0800 From: liangshengjun To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: freebsd v10.1 usb dwc-otg controller question Thread-Topic: freebsd v10.1 usb dwc-otg controller question Thread-Index: AdC+reDGuDZROSfNSfW5DlpX3vdk4A== Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:25:20 +0000 Message-ID: <89FBC1DE4212CF47B4703A5CF8466DFBB97D50@szxemi502-mbx.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.63.194.65] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:26:59 -0000 Hi , Now I am porting the dwc-otg driver (FreeBSD v10.1) for X_ platform ,which = PHY version is "3.00a 10-AUG-2012" of Synopsys. And the dwc-otg controller is config default as device mode, but some inter= rupt event is not trigger when connect to host port(PC) . So I distrusted whether freebsd dwc-otg driver is supported for older older= version of synopsys controller? please help to check follow case: 1. which version of synopsys is FreeBSD_v10.1 dwc driver designed for= ? 2. whether the FreeBSD_v10.1 dwc driver supports the dwc driver versi= on "3.00a 10-AUG-2012" controller? 3. If unsupported , any suggestion for how to improve FreeBSD_v10.1 d= wc driver to workwith version "3.00a 10-AUG-2012" controller? Looking forward to your response, thank you. Best Wishes Shengjun Liang From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 15 06:13:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E0679A224C for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 06:13:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3042810A6 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 06:13:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFFwG-0003Da-8a for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:13:04 +0200 Received: from pool-72-66-1-32.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([72.66.1.32]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:13:04 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-72-66-1-32.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 08:13:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Subject: Re: another NSA leak: Network security code appears on GitHub Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 02:12:50 -0400 Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: <55A59451.6030900@gmail.com> Reply-To: nightrecon@hotmail.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-72-66-1-32.washdc.fios.verizon.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 06:13:07 -0000 jd1008 wrote: [snip] > So, who on FBSD dev team is scanning the kernel, compilers, C/C++ > libraries, application and app libraries for security ? https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/coverity.html https://scan.coverity.com/projects/317 http://www.coverity.com/press-releases/press_story58_05_20_08/ > I do not think anyone is. It is an absolutely daunting task. You would be mistaken. By way of an example, or two: http://hardenedbsd.org/ https://opnsense.org/ > It is the state of the world today. Yep. So many people who simply cannot read. Then they get on the IntarWebZ and attempt writing, spouting off about so much they know so little about. > So incredibly unfortunate. So is uninformed trolling. Get some clue. Then your trolling can become entertainment. I'm certain the 'Never Say Anything' crowd will get a good laugh. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 15 06:28:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396A39A252C for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 06:28:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrisstankevitz@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x229.google.com (mail-la0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5124187F for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 06:28:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrisstankevitz@gmail.com) Received: by lagx9 with SMTP id x9so18565708lag.1 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:28:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=2MT4e+15PWc72vuHZJB79ClVTj2RkJF0i4F+NJg5e5A=; b=EQZuTFRhZEvRPjVomsBbbUVSkP4pytemjlU6G/NFNIuZ2irlXWNzixvSpqaMmiydlC cKeY9h2VLxpvrYrbZqsPRKBh2Qf/u8hcPp/G+KMo9y4X04xza4Luc0MQThYyFtzGLpoP twJmpMM8K3g0s/H36KvlXBC0ybgiINUVDD4yk8u2k4j7zsgPDeawzLC6JNTlzUpUzPdZ Y+hCLdCMvhs7Si3yukeSX1VrTSPZ3EG0v75reaqRYvnuuZ9G6x1IhsnFjGjF0w1twipn g3Q3euL57w4Fxk3wBuirTMcsZvlvON1MTIAbPdTmTPU4JI4dxK4MFwgiUtjPYUZQXljR MYrQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.115.142 with SMTP id jo14mr2453790lab.62.1436941735781; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:28:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.208.208 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:28:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <558F99B6.2080205@sneakertech.com> <559070CC.8040105@sneakertech.com> <20150628232208.GA69625@neutralgood.org> Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:28:55 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Corrupt GPT on ZFS full-disks that shouldn't be using GPT From: Chris Stankevitz To: kpneal@pobox.com Cc: Quartz , freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 06:28:58 -0000 On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote: > Can I use dd on a /dev/daX that is currently part of an > imported, mounted, and online zpool? No. If you try to use dd to overwrite the last sector of the drive while it (the entire drive) is used by zfs, you will get "dd: /dev/daX: Operation not permitted". Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 15 06:53:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED579A2A18 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 06:53:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from benfell@parts-unknown.org) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [50.250.218.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58C171510 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 06:53:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from benfell@parts-unknown.org) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 80) id 210E8592AB86; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 2601:645:501:18f0:7277:81ff:fe34:d8fd ([2601:645:501:18f0:7277:81ff:fe34:d8fd]) by mail.parts-unknown.org (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:53:02 -0700 Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 23:53:02 -0700 Message-ID: <20150714235302.Horde.YWcl-WNJiDYy4oTaR-35dXC@mail.parts-unknown.org> From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: now *neither* version of cclient works User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_n5GgmuAKIikwRbTfy5SaIsf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 06:53:09 -0000 This message is in MIME format and has been PGP signed. --=_n5GgmuAKIikwRbTfy5SaIsf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I guess it had to happen sometime. With php56-imap, no matter which version of cclient I use, I get a segfault= . vegan# freebsd-version ; uname -a 10.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD vegan.parts-unknown.org 10.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD=20=20 10.2-PRERELEASE=20#0 r284882: Fri Jun 26 21:31:36 PDT 2015=20=20=20=20=20= =20 root@vegan.parts-unknown.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC=20 amd64 I've been having to bounce back and forth between amanda-cclient and=20=20 the=20traditional cclient. And now neither works. Is there a sane=20=20 approach=20to this problem? Thanks! --=20 David Benfell --=_n5GgmuAKIikwRbTfy5SaIsf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: PGP Digital Signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJVpgNOAAoJEBV64x4SNmArB7EQAJB0F7GUl2Y3BmryzvqkTgcf qyXJwV7cSJnEw5U5MmtnluyJGhMaxO27y8LEEv4qDxZGkZfl7GZZio2fEYGxLPMx 0CudmOCm69Ewyyp0e+8RNw/oG2H96TQh3OZf04CqzM4MwEdE83JoIupYjcAPQMrq 5TdyJ91K7tYAfqgw4RBAzmADCs33cS4BdVMMJ8zSjMR7TlbZMssOcOqqq0hOy1St BiC+u9k6zCASHX53IGxIZ428ex/ELqg+oIZNFqAaCo6v3hOvOhAtyZxcP/Ix2O1x ziDEsrmXzhAsAzIG/MgTSZWMcQzXgoE9dUMQ4uhO7IkkL7/tWjYcJty17VwBRa5/ 73orxnrhDeI9FCnIyClkdHOoOQ/+UCt4EVRI4tazcK7V+ACIkGEs0lfTVk8j7+Sd 6FwopkKI5xegTqu9gbJDNbJ3+U5CRm1JrIVQ1pEW6+VJ51DJP+2wNE7P0QiPPQC4 G8ZGx8aFByI+kvHQFpEfM3azExuKh8z0tkhdpd2k6qiXu45D/b0hsB0KHFjKvE47 PRU48PBejdRShzU1mqceurldaHYvg9wr81tzSb5X0ot6j0z2sp74IPQha/cMNHjx qOpaRTI9LV4XbH/6+UTCe7dP1vpqVyZ2hlHs3HNSqpqvaJDdWnuYhl/70+981vg1 fiItwU+pJZcpVjWxtsiD =4Bvs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_n5GgmuAKIikwRbTfy5SaIsf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 15 07:41:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5103E9A227C for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:41:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from douhisi.pair.com (douhisi.pair.com [209.68.5.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 257341259 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:41:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from [10.2.2.1] (pool-173-48-121-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [173.48.121.235]) by douhisi.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3E593F7BF; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:41:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <55A60E9D.6090903@sneakertech.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 03:41:17 -0400 From: Quartz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jd1008 CC: FreeBSD Users Subject: Re: Snowden, NSA spying, hard drive malware ... what we need is a UN privacy watchdog! References: <55A58D3A.1070600@gmail.com> <44vbdmxsxc.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> <55A591B1.6000507@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <55A591B1.6000507@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:41:26 -0000 > Mr. Lowell, > It is YOU who is utterly RUDE!!! > You should unsubscribe, or someone should unsubscribe you and ban you > from the list. With all due respect, he has a legitimate complaint here. This is a list specifically for people to get help with FreeBSD, not a list for general discussion about general computer topics. To make matters worse, you're not even really starting any sort of a discussion or trying to relate it to FreeBSD in any way- you're just posting random links. Complaining about this in this context is not rude (however, replying to an off-list message back to the list definitely IS). > Hard Drive Malware is infecting all OS'es, Except that article wasn't even about drive malware. In fact the words 'drive' and 'malware' weren't anywhere in the body. They just threw that into the title as clickbait (a repeat problem with The Register). Even if it was actually about malware, unless the malware was an issue that was related to FreeBSD in some way it doesn't belong on this list. >> You are voicing a mere opinion of someone who thinks he represents > everyone else on this list, I think you opened up a can of worms with this statement and invited everyone to complain to you. >that no one else wants to know about such > important issues. It's not like people live in here or something, we look at other news the same way you do and can get this information the same way you can. It's clear that general computer security issues are important to you, and that's fine in itself, but this isn't the right place to talk about it. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 15 12:00:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7E9F9A2192 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 12:00:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 491DF2833 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 12:00:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass@gmx.com) Received: from moby.local ([37.6.29.167]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LlYrb-1YeuTh2ydr-00bHuI; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:00:22 +0200 Message-ID: <55A64B2B.3040709@gmx.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:59:39 +0300 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcus Reid CC: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions" Subject: Re: tar: Damaged tar archive, Retrying... References: <55A3F7F2.3060400@gmx.com> <20150714204305.GA89782@blazingdot.com> In-Reply-To: <20150714204305.GA89782@blazingdot.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:bQGqZPT/lWriBhkCU9bqS4NUp7diLYPvm9MCEd4mrm/wkAEe1yD Wk2EKOq4m2YQWY/4ypAkaPJksqjAsDwXCHCDnBmd3lGDt9+oWQZUPSD1wimWn8ahKWq7o3S zJ5nhpm+ytPcn/WY/SRZs/s5LIQPMisgvFy9lONyvg4ZrLT+SYI8ePpWUECeIn+zh3CwkpF ie5fd9vhlMif1zskGuo+g== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:C+PorDoKKcU=:FLDij5b3o5Pdycc/tpVgfw Vg8e5Ahe5Y2a8kWYi+ApSFQAAtvusqK1UvE+Qo0jf3Q7dHjHqV8Xq4FR+Ml73zyB9u4T9LJ1p lY4fUQpBcT0xuKUaiM3xWbQKPIoKFixju5YSVAtJWQHTImrhJLbUsrzjuh78T1pYX5aPgRimk zpJhMzOvmv4iIX+tsYebmtg2HQklkeyLr94ZLEBCG8CCq1o2rx+3LAOdPGOFEf2mJN3FddHG3 NKHwNFtjplcDWXTLUXTGcvuC00QiZhLRxxsTmsgBGvlqJ0nUHf5Tq3aHPKXOZ3RFDo/1GrjcB 6Aimep9kZn1HlAEwdAH+F/IocxTNVWekQni3Y+2pXJLDtjrY1y7bzwDdec+7a8LLIHYlKgyDn CWMbQ6uOH1vGWZ3OKJ1jcjyWOgMLkA79oAlZgQC5CSzWSz/nEUT9Ts+vazfMTGr/p4lt2dvcA YD4uSnRN31idw1nID1hLQR/F/Dt6tmVPaf+tnLOQVg4pQljZh1cIP33MvPqCgFLFaL4jowVl7 n/QOkB3M5FYTRTc5ujL1HUoSlR8IfmiMP4yAnDOqY2D1izbHRfDmY9gKtldB8Z+LK+pXNTp3S LkJVdSEv2Lr0ciOB1NOeo4PuTj64Ms2qVhONz8mMxCyeHIy2V6gDCKRU/LP6SeHRUP20WVDmY aTXH1x0P91Zy/64G9Lt8ped0hIAe7E8kKQ/7MEvENUtQ0JzH/BbY53XZAvk1GG2eMHeg= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 12:00:26 -0000 On 07/14/15 23:43, Marcus Reid wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 08:40:02PM +0300, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am currently using tar to copy some very files to another host and >> got this: >>> tar: Damaged tar archive >>> tar: Retrying... >>> tar: Damaged tar archive >>> tar: Retrying... >>> tar: Damaged tar archive >>> tar: Retrying... >>> tar: Damaged tar archive >>> tar: Retrying... >>> tar: Damaged tar archive >> >> The copy is done using tar|nc and nc|tar on the receiving host. >> This looks like a bug and I wonder whether the copy is OK. > > I have submitted a bug report for a problem that causes this output. > It's likely the same bug that you're encountering. > > The fix is upstream in libarchive, but in the meantime you can use gtar > :( > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201506 Ok. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 15 17:39:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5A79A2A8C for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:39:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com (mail-pa0-f41.google.com [209.85.220.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE31B1EEC for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:39:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: by pactm7 with SMTP id tm7so27805804pac.2 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:39:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=tLr42k0TSv96ulyWacfQdBK7kucXVREDUsbl8uzGsrA=; b=XpaFDSsGMrcbdS2DJcl/pn7lTmgHCUQsfMkmVc1QSUFWNLZPmksVrKfNotS178oK4q oRE3/znyuTa7fAcihdgbbePDxn7hZZSBnfTWG8DPdQNTr3T9dZk8I8iNmOg/CFfdH4cq XMOSMUu7/cMWsk48VtMnxQGxbxhNnE8+LQ3fdkpXF1UFe2jH7rf9hwY33M7yMUnIDF8W 2Ed31jJ75fZPfOPSLcemzxdnM5O1nSMqL+ZjFj1uN1b3bgdtflD9jPtzxuHR3TnlQRaC F1V9cVPKyf+9BHZ2XkmS6+Cx0zI0ajMVzrPeOBtihUewwo5tu87Dd8As8gPNH6ETK1K0 RGJg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk2WQFyWdBTwlfXo1a+vpxHWC+5bpofIr6JeE5XVz9ohniJuU2QN2TREcZbEyJaEXD1bLvV MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.70.30.193 with SMTP id u1mr10150100pdh.59.1436981947526; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.75.136 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:39:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:39:07 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Problem installing PC-BSD 10 cd9660 ... PCBSD_INSTALL failed with error 19 From: Alejandro Imass To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:39:14 -0000 Hi, I have this same exact problem: http://wiki.pcbsd.org/index.php/Talk:Installation_Troubleshooting But I am not sure I am doing the suggested solution. 1) Pressing 2 or Esc right after Welcome to GRUB! does not stop the graphical screen to show up. 2) So I press 'e' to edit commands before booting and prompted with an Emacs style editor. 3) I add set debug.acpi.disabled ="hostres" right before the line that says set kFreeBSD.vfs.root.mountfrom=cd9660..... 4) Press Ctrl-X to boot the install but always results in same error mounting from cd9660:/dev/iso9660/FREEBSD_INSTALL failed with error 19 Not sure what to do at this point. Thanks! Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 15 17:47:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37D39A2D59 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:47:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greg@mail.gregs-garage.com) Received: from mail.gregs-garage.com (99-158-164-253.uvs.cicril.sbcglobal.net [99.158.164.253]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0BE319D9 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:47:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from greg@mail.gregs-garage.com) Received: from mail.gregs-garage.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gregs-garage.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTP id t6FHacSi024472 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 12:36:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from greg@mail.gregs-garage.com) Received: (from www@localhost) by mail.gregs-garage.com (8.15.2/8.15.1/Submit) id t6FHacqD024471; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 12:36:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from greg@mail.gregs-garage.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.gregs-garage.com: www set sender to greg@localhost using -f To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Kerberos X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 12:36:38 -0500 From: greg Message-ID: <75d664eeb361264e9b4560a89b1a32bf@mail.gregs-garage.com> X-Sender: greg@localhost User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.2 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.gregs-garage.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:47:54 -0000 Setting up a fresh install of FreeBSD 10.1 to run RT42 on Apache 2.4 with PHP 5.6 & a MySQL 5.6 backend. So far, so good. Now trying to configure Apache to authenticate against a fresh install of Windows 2012 using ap24-mod_auth_kerb2, and I'm running into a brick wall. uname -a : FreeBSD ATBSD01 10.1-RELEASE-p10 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Wed May 13 06:54:13 UTC 2015 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 So far I've created a user on the Windows domain to use in the keytab I've configured my krb5.conf file I've generated a keytab file on the Windows box, and installed it on the FreeBSD server, and configured Apache to use the keytab to authenticate a test directory, but so far, no luck. To troubleshoot the config, I've been trying using the command line tools for Kerberos. Here's my krb5.conf: [libdefaults] default_realm = EXAMPLE.LOCAL [domain_realm] .example.local = EXAMPLE.LOCAL example.local = EXAMPLE.LOCAL [realms] EXAMPLE.LOCAL = { admin_server=ad01.example.local:749 kdc=ad01.example.local:88 } Here's the command I ran on the windows box: C:\Windows\system32>ktpass -princ HTTP/ad01.example.local@EXAMPLE.LOCAL -mapuser aduser -pass P@$$word -ptype KRB5_NT_PRINCIPAL -out :\temp\krb5.keytab I then copy the krb5.keytab file to the /etc directory on the FreeBSD server, then run chown root:wheel on the file, and chmod 600. From the FreeBSD box, I can do the following: $ kinit aduser aduser@EXAMPLE.LOCAL's Password: P@$$word $ klist Credentials cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_1001 Principal: aduser@EXAMPLE.LOCAL Issued Expires Principal Jul 15 12:06:49 2015 Jul 15 22:06:49 2015 krbtgt/EXAMPLE.LOCAL@EXAMPLE.LOCAL It works. However if I try: $ kinit -k aduser I get: kinit: krb5_get_init_creds: Already tried ENC-TS-info, looping ("kinit -t /etc/krb5.keytab aduser" returns the same) I've tried to validate the keytab file by running: $ ktutil list and get the following: Vno Type Principal Aliases 27 arcfour-hmac-md5 HTTP/ad01.example.local@EXAMPLE.LOCAL I get the same result if I run as root. I've sat and combed through WireShark captures, and the only thing I notice is that if I run kinit without the keytab, I can see the windows server responding a single time with an error message of "KRB5KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_REQUIRED", it then continues through the communication and a ticket is created. However if I attempt to use kinit and specify the keytab file, I see two "KRB5KDC_ERR_PREAUTH_REQUIRED" errors, one after the other, and the communication stops. I'm guessing that either the password was never saved correctly to the keytab or kinit isn't reading / transmitting it to the Windows server. I've tried multiple versions of the keytab file (as seen by the version number from kutil, this was attempt 28) with the same result. I've tried specifying the encoding type, changing the username to domain\username, as well as username@domain.local, nothing seems to work. Any ideas on how to progress from here? Best regards. Greg Groth From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 15 18:08:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45FA49A21CA for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:08:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from douhisi.pair.com (douhisi.pair.com [209.68.5.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 223AA1645 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:08:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from [10.2.2.1] (pool-173-48-121-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [173.48.121.235]) by douhisi.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37A083F878; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:08:41 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <55A6A1A8.6000207@sneakertech.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:08:40 -0400 From: Quartz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alejandro Imass CC: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Problem installing PC-BSD 10 cd9660 ... PCBSD_INSTALL failed with error 19 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:08:43 -0000 Although PC-BSD is FreeBSD under the hood they do different things with their installer so I'm not sure how much people on this list will be able to help you. > 1) Pressing 2 or Esc right after Welcome to GRUB! does not stop the > graphical screen to show up. IIRC, older/some versions of grub never got around to natively supporting usb, and so you need to go into your bios and set legacy usb mode to emulate a PS/2 keyboard. ...unless you already did that, in which case I'm out of ideas :) > 3) I add set debug.acpi.disabled ="hostres" right before the line that > says set kFreeBSD.vfs.root.mountfrom=cd9660..... If the latest PC-BSD installer is anything like FreeBSD's you're not supposed to be editing any file, but rather passing options to the boot process directly on a sort of command line. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 15 18:27:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA5B19A25FB for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:27:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1B58168E for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:27:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC7E020784 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:27:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:27:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=icwIZIoESIaxREr fEXXauqLlozc=; b=YvGmQG3A8mKa9EGKccWAvZf/5lKX/0Y3XP45cgxUMTCj/IW ayPkwpvA0HFwPDwpPp4YpUtonA5s5FH23GliqSlkX18EhT46qs2I1k5TZv3PNqTk XKLue/ZAQoacfBcUwEsK8gMhurKYuWC29yICwvSyef4YcbbqWw251m2o1OCc= Received: by web3.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id A883310DC57; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:27:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1436984873.1408153.324643337.5EEC6AAD@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: vTxGIid/eWzSuG3xr0QJyDzvEyGocbxOVzUdrfHWeI0B 1436984873 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: benfell@parts-unknown.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-63a5d8c6 Subject: Re: now *neither* version of cclient works Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:27:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20150714235302.Horde.YWcl-WNJiDYy4oTaR-35dXC@mail.parts-unknown.org> References: <20150714235302.Horde.YWcl-WNJiDYy4oTaR-35dXC@mail.parts-unknown.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:27:54 -0000 On Wed, Jul 15, 2015, at 01:53, David Benfell wrote: > Hi all, > > I guess it had to happen sometime. > > With php56-imap, no matter which version of cclient I use, I get a > segfault. > > vegan# freebsd-version ; uname -a > 10.2-PRERELEASE > FreeBSD vegan.parts-unknown.org 10.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD > 10.2-PRERELEASE #0 r284882: Fri Jun 26 21:31:36 PDT 2015 > root@vegan.parts-unknown.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > I've been having to bounce back and forth between amanda-cclient and > the traditional cclient. And now neither works. Is there a sane > approach to this problem? > Is this your problem? Warning The IMAP, recode, YAZ and Cyrus extensions cannot be used in conjuction, because they share the same internal symbols. Note: Yaz 2.0 and above does not suffer from this problem. http://php.net/manual/en/imap.installation.php From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 15 18:49:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD1E9A2ADB for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:49:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C38061EB8 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:49:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57964205D5 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:49:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:49:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=LMVSB9fT2nmAr1/ GNt7y3wEHOtw=; b=kFosr1J+U/7aTLYj9dBkOSXyqABYUvFMYqVl6yeEetyXSQa EUDmRTI4fhUDhfMYnzZC3BvPQsahDvcrb6SPwQsX9WpggexG7rw7qXQ17nP79dAC 0MxSyxxKRB4UbMBN4GtjYhvib5saex/lbeIVJaYRMy0IyL/YCvcw1QMqvZ9E= Received: by web3.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 2BFF410DD69; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:49:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1436986163.1413191.324661081.78935161@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: ufgxXivkAEmWg3tAxY+eMQ3LTlfCdr6iFKzeDhj9DnHI 1436986163 From: Mark Felder To: Marcus Reid , Nikos Vassiliadis Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-63a5d8c6 Subject: Re: tar: Damaged tar archive, Retrying... Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:49:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20150714204305.GA89782@blazingdot.com> References: <55A3F7F2.3060400@gmx.com> <20150714204305.GA89782@blazingdot.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:49:25 -0000 On Tue, Jul 14, 2015, at 15:43, Marcus Reid wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 08:40:02PM +0300, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am currently using tar to copy some very files to another host and > > got this: > > > tar: Damaged tar archive > > > tar: Retrying... > > > tar: Damaged tar archive > > > tar: Retrying... > > > tar: Damaged tar archive > > > tar: Retrying... > > > tar: Damaged tar archive > > > tar: Retrying... > > > tar: Damaged tar archive > > > > The copy is done using tar|nc and nc|tar on the receiving host. > > This looks like a bug and I wonder whether the copy is OK. > > I have submitted a bug report for a problem that causes this output. > It's likely the same bug that you're encountering. > > The fix is upstream in libarchive, but in the meantime you can use gtar > :( > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201506 > Thanks for pointing out this PR. I'll try to get some movement behind this. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jul 15 18:49:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27E69A2AF0 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:49:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-pd0-f174.google.com (mail-pd0-f174.google.com [209.85.192.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D32991F1E for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:49:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: by pdbqm3 with SMTP id qm3so29551960pdb.0 for ; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:49:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=clXSjnqDJ+ETRNg43knx68Y0KRKSAQQ2UagpVibKgwM=; b=W6kWIV1BMoG9lm0xgRjAWSAJNEYA8jth7zTQJ+iRQdK47Yb9oQ6JgIfBSYbJY+lph1 omnjGcRzmmPwoIkKijLQ8BXsvJH5soRNDC2M+Jdop9z7YkajT2y8vq8YVuiRqEeNqvah alSY/GlIAIFBNmiC+ADcv0YOI5h7uZdCU4FAMtC2PSg5egmjSVv2lqyVZtSyku2PKmSB SMJLVHK2sJw7jWn57HV6Yg4E5OkUnixCCRBO69ieMw+o9tOc7M8U6yVLbXNhzL6ACOcV vwlD0ONWZ71mNZ/JsOyTv0oTqJTTS28Lu5CaA6iof8GCQPo+7lcDUiJrK9REkcPPTBAn dgaA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnLSf15RJWtgawKWZfM7dy9BgqtpHKEMTzTcFbdxcrMh2trOxLDUBuftId6oVbJ1yP4Opwm MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.219.42 with SMTP id pl10mr10480936pbc.154.1436982261970; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.75.136 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:44:21 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: OT - To the people at sina.com From: Alejandro Imass To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:49:39 -0000 Can you please shut off your auto-responders!! It is very annoying. Thanks! Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 00:08:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13189A2B7E for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:08:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from knusbaum@sdf.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "SDF.ORG" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6488310E7 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:08:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from knusbaum@sdf.org) Received: from sverige.freeshell.org (IDENT:knusbaum@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.5]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6G08ZQ6016171 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified NO) for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:08:35 GMT Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:08:35 +0000 (UTC) From: Kyle X-X-Sender: knusbaum@iceland.freeshell.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Ext4 Kernel Panic Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (NEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (sdf.lonestar.org [192.94.73.23]); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:08:35 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 00:08:46 -0000 So I mount an ext4 partition like so: # mount -r -t ext2fs /dev/ada2p1 /mnt And then I try to copy some files. This consistently results in a kernel panic. The core dump is here: http://knusbaum.inlisp.org/core.txt Anyone seen anything like this? Thanks, knusbaum@sdf.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 01:57:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5098F9A343A for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 01:57:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sliderule.demon.co.uk) Received: from smtp.demon.co.uk (mdfmta010.mxout.tch.inty.net [91.221.169.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E315F1252 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 01:57:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sliderule.demon.co.uk) Received: from smtp.demon.co.uk (unknown [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mdfmta010.tch.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AEE0400F05 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:50:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from mdfmta004.tch.inty.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mdfmta004.tch.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B700AC40FE for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:50:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from mdfmta004.tch.inty.net (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mdfmta004.tch.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C978CAC40B7 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:50:32 +0100 (BST) Received: from [192.168.254.7] (unknown [80.177.21.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mdfmta004.tch.inty.net (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:50:32 +0100 (BST) Subject: Re: Ext4 Kernel Panic To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Steve Burton Message-ID: <55A70DE8.9090302@sliderule.demon.co.uk> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:50:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-MDF-HostID: 17 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 01:57:24 -0000 On 16/07/2015 01:08, Kyle wrote: > > So I mount an ext4 partition like so: > > # mount -r -t ext2fs /dev/ada2p1 /mnt > > And then I try to copy some files. This consistently results in a > kernel panic. > > The core dump is here: http://knusbaum.inlisp.org/core.txt > > Anyone seen anything like this? > > Thanks, > > knusbaum@sdf.org > SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I'm curious. Does the ext2fs driver support ext4 ? Steve. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 02:16:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BF59A382B for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:16:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stoa@gmx.us) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 484AF1DEF for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:16:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stoa@gmx.us) Received: from puffyzz.attlocal.net ([24.116.197.15]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MaIw0-1ZZR1O3ii8-00JpKr for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 04:16:19 +0200 Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 21:16:08 -0500 From: Dutch Ingraham To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ext4 Kernel Panic Message-ID: <20150716021608.GA6831@puffyzz.attlocal.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:THcfMJFVr0jZwx6jFG1AxSYSsWSNuGk01G0K0YKZz/3sVwblW40 nmYeUMt53p5/+sjOlWMrDRUX5S+/N5snz1AvSUM9TpGieZXl17MObruHxhTKV8VRubsT/Gw SJX2fTiq4WknnAtELc38oooHW0SaFFYHJZGBexridMgY3PGdqAGeK30eLHg6QQ5hkYk9MCn KP090Fqq+MWJT0Onoe7uQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:j92S/HXT+MQ=:yK04iSr1MlauMtkoyMvlv4 zQS2tRcnXkUwj/VZ86wl4w4AKn2zvBJy+pCotrhCOQwzf99c9+JjPG+kjiqebMDgrFsHW9h7M tt0uFJYfyhdDGuJs8avvMHSj9k9en0+JN5gsaVidZsw9jsC5pCCzxEoO0Oo7E0AM7XXa9jfuE tTPOaxMwJRWBwh6JZpxrmM66yXTRxrD4A7HczgK6YqL9tCv5posnWWofzWoMwpLjHhxyzghkm 1G5NP9t6MlpW+HDRR63GXXG0RnX4/N6qSJgDhm2WTe+6KvgGCkpA206clGeGehdEn6tJjpOor CfHg0AaYSXXjgoc4uSHgAAIb4I60BVLb2Su0c1ZXT4NmgwuMTkHBvrllCugqZrm9NyTjALiT6 gI/+QRss/gagQn61p5n+ZVJgfiRQLIpLktBqBmQLXP34eeuc525ICAONuYGwta2/4nR0p/dN8 6J6e0oGP7AYZuZXI9ED3izazVtPTELghuCUnW+bNwO+3zoSxwNvFhqf0GydPnrBtOEb46Z/b0 1rPGj10iQq/1ILtCQcWnVMc1ylmrToqRwVPNAz1b6U+3k9Ck7Xk7DT+mHeKSde+x4pMKkhXUg mIOi9PLwBbS/u5ln0xhSZOxgzEx8x0RCLUkHgE97szweG8nxK8vcTvjFVdxbrO0K7sOaP9rGG C+11v79jVxrKEynmIAp+h1ZIaEHPTSAkE93fIKe9hG5dcsQ== X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:16:27 -0000 On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:08:35AM +0000, Kyle wrote: > > So I mount an ext4 partition like so: > > # mount -r -t ext2fs /dev/ada2p1 /mnt > > And then I try to copy some files. This consistently results in a kernel > panic. As I understand it, once the kernel module is manually loaded, the ext2fs(5) driver will allow reads from and writes to an ext2 filesystem, but will only support reads of an ext4 filesystem. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 02:39:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 156D09A3C8A for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:39:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from knusbaum@sdf.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "SDF.ORG" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4BBF1BB5 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:39:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from knusbaum@sdf.org) Received: from sverige.freeshell.org (IDENT:knusbaum@sverige.freeshell.org [192.94.73.5]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6G2dF9P010408 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified NO); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:39:16 GMT Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:39:15 +0000 (UTC) From: Kyle X-X-Sender: knusbaum@iceland.freeshell.org To: Dutch Ingraham cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ext4 Kernel Panic In-Reply-To: <20150716021608.GA6831@puffyzz.attlocal.net> Message-ID: References: <20150716021608.GA6831@puffyzz.attlocal.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (NEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 02:39:28 -0000 On Wed, 15 Jul 2015, Dutch Ingraham wrote: > Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 21:16:08 -0500 > From: Dutch Ingraham > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Ext4 Kernel Panic > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:08:35AM +0000, Kyle wrote: >> >> So I mount an ext4 partition like so: >> >> # mount -r -t ext2fs /dev/ada2p1 /mnt >> >> And then I try to copy some files. This consistently results in a kernel >> panic. > > As I understand it, once the kernel module is manually loaded, the ext2fs(5) > driver will allow reads from and writes to an ext2 filesystem, but will > only support reads of an ext4 filesystem. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I should have clarified. I'm copying FROM the ext4 partition TO a different partition. The ext4 partition is mounted read-only (notice the -r) Even if I was trying to write to an ext4 partition, it should result in some sort of error, not a panic. knusbaum@sdf.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 03:28:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F13199C500 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 03:28:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from benfell@parts-unknown.org) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [IPv6:2001:470:67:119::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 345FA1962 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 03:28:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from benfell@parts-unknown.org) Received: by mail.parts-unknown.org (Postfix, from userid 80) id 0E179592AB87; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 20:28:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.parts-unknown.org (mail.parts-unknown.org [2001:470:67:119::4]) by mail.parts-unknown.org (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 20:28:51 -0700 Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 20:28:51 -0700 Message-ID: <20150715202851.Horde.-1cxzkPoUNa-9SZeXZUO_Mj@mail.parts-unknown.org> From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: SOLVED: Re: now *neither* version of cclient works References: <20150714235302.Horde.YWcl-WNJiDYy4oTaR-35dXC@mail.parts-unknown.org> <1436984873.1408153.324643337.5EEC6AAD@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1436984873.1408153.324643337.5EEC6AAD@webmail.messagingengine.com> User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=_c4EJcxtWHTmjbX-5mV2J-QV"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 03:28:53 -0000 This message is in MIME format and has been PGP signed. --=_c4EJcxtWHTmjbX-5mV2J-QV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoting Mark Felder : > On Wed, Jul 15, 2015, at 01:53, David Benfell wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I guess it had to happen sometime. >> >> With php56-imap, no matter which version of cclient I use, I get a >> segfault. > > Is this your problem? > > Warning > > The IMAP, recode, YAZ and Cyrus extensions cannot be used in conjuction, > because they share the same internal symbols. Note: Yaz 2.0 and above > does not suffer from this problem. > > http://php.net/manual/en/imap.installation.php Looks like it. I had php56-recode installed. I tried removing it,=20=20 rebuilding=20php56-imap, and now it all seems happy. Thanks! --=20 David=20Benfell --=_c4EJcxtWHTmjbX-5mV2J-QV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: PGP Digital Signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAABAgAGBQJVpyTzAAoJEBV64x4SNmArf1cP/RJtbHy2pIrM/beU3Lvlk0nH cEOTbRJ6G/rvuCQtBnwl2JQOdErHHVdtWXT+MzbwMlwoTLhuf0G/0M3UMXH1x64+ YD1SUY/bHz7GMbUbgGj7LJCbmTYq9NI2cg6Kx8SoNhJEEXaCmFJq9JCrWlOByrl7 OmICOMnJ1oVDlIEGHDOUaQmpVeN1bYBVXIv2n0Rt2Zq3aiDCEAHPXzlwfFyAhp5e 9FJvXKskkpjrEMdMIy19fTf78GEjuU+oFkYGg/hxGw7tg21w7xIdClT3ZQT7hK22 8Sz1/eBBp+syCzXaZnzfhcTcVsxyNdGv6/t/YBTJAcltrtI2wVPFbm8kyJL3e8FU nuCS5ZhNu8ziWuC3YVFu3nOpvtrhsFwdojRooNvPZz4G7SFdxOmJiujZxmv43P4g DbI5pBlpDJFAIJZzAErVsJBekyzmKdcHTdzX7EU7CVVXrOoFsbFPILp4I781mUy6 aQCriWYaME5rqMpStMIgZbbPXXhGWJ2XWQ1ExqaPrTfJKSubchZedXMDQCEGaE36 tpB3mXjEl0yq2M+LG1Ieg3DuE71WGc+z5M+Np2cbt/ynVVc4FyoQdScmicc0sPwm 9TLcx8jXfipjxHOqsVbTx93dpZMlY7vLNIyxtWb19Bb5duT6pDGVxoCFZm1ll5bI 5fMFQZg2vGvi/FpDPWff =cf7c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_c4EJcxtWHTmjbX-5mV2J-QV-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 07:20:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5243B9A3A61 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:20:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raimund.sacherer@logitravel.com) Received: from formentor.toolfactory.net (pina.toolfactory.net [213.97.158.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F299610B4 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raimund.sacherer@logitravel.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by formentor.toolfactory.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0475177AE1; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:12:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from formentor.toolfactory.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (formentor.toolfactory.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id AdC15gwRMJqL; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:12:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by formentor.toolfactory.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE85178050; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:12:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at logpmzimmta01v.toolfactory.net Received: from formentor.toolfactory.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (formentor.toolfactory.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id V7YMYHMe0y71; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:12:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from xorrigo.toolfactory.net (xorrigo.toolfactory.net [192.168.2.210]) by formentor.toolfactory.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B86177DB0; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:12:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:12:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Raimund Sacherer Reply-To: Raimund Sacherer To: greg Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1383995814.37100404.1437030764957.JavaMail.zimbra@logitravel.com> In-Reply-To: <75d664eeb361264e9b4560a89b1a32bf@mail.gregs-garage.com> References: <75d664eeb361264e9b4560a89b1a32bf@mail.gregs-garage.com> Subject: Re: Kerberos MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [192.168.2.213] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.8_GA_6184 (ZimbraWebClient - SAF7 (Mac)/8.0.8_GA_6184) Thread-Topic: Kerberos Thread-Index: 6oey7Yr4jOe4ZRie2+5Ognzld7hnBw== X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 07:20:04 -0000 Hello Greg, > C:\Windows\system32>ktpass -princ HTTP/ad01.example.local@EXAMPLE.LOCAL > -mapuser aduser -pass P@$$word -ptype KRB5_NT_PRINCIPAL -out > :\temp\krb5.keytab For what its worth, we have a couple of servers authenticating against an 2012 domain and we create the key tab file like this: setspn -A HTTP/service.host.name windowsusername ktpass -out key.tab -princ HTTP/service.host.name@EXAMPLE.LOCAL -mapUser windowsuser -mapOp set -pass password -crypto RC4-HMAC-NT -pType KRB5_NT_PRINCIPAL At times we have instead of RC4-HMAC-NT set ALL. Hope this helps, best From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 10:25:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA6D9A30F9 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:25:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@cisjournal.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A550C1C95 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:25:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@cisjournal.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A24859A30F8; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:25:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E609A30F4 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:25:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@cisjournal.org) Received: from dmail-031.servers.eqx.misp.co.uk (dmail-031.servers.eqx.misp.co.uk [185.52.24.204]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ED031C94 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:25:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@cisjournal.org) Received: from [39.32.5.239] (helo=user-PC) by dmail-031.servers.eqx.misp.co.uk with esmtpa (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFfKg-0006F6-C6 for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:19:58 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Editor Scientific Journals" To: "questions@freebsd.org" Reply-To: info@cisjournal.org Date: 16 Jul 2015 14:31:42 +0500 Subject: Publication in Scientific Journals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:25:26 -0000 Dear Scientists and Colleagues, It is our pleasure to invite you to send= your valuable contributions in the following Journals: JETCIS (Journal= of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences) Vol. 6 No. 7;= JST (Journal of Science and Technology) Vol. 5 No. 7; Manuscripts can be= uploaded through online system (by browsing the Journal URL) or in an electronic= form (.pdf or .doc) to: editor.scjournal@gmail.com; Sincerely Yours, Managing= Editor Journal of Science and Technology From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 15:38:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502B29A3730 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:38:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABBEE1AD3 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:38:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from testbox.news4all.se (testbox.usenet4all.se [10.0.0.3]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id t6GFc1bx031853 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:38:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <55A7CFFC.4010900@bananmonarki.se> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:38:36 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Python and matplotlib problems Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:38:14 -0000 Hello list. Trying to get a python program to work on 10.1. Got it working for a while on 9.3 but it stopped there too. This is the error I get when moving /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 out. > python FlatCAM.py EndFontMetrics0 ; N L55896 ; B 0 0 1000 1000 ;0 ;ted. All Rights Reserved.. EndFontMetricsPCC z 0 0 ; PCC caron 37 0 ;83 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ;ights Reserved.Shannon is a trademark of Agfa Corporation. Traceback (most recent call last): File "FlatCAM.py", line 3, in from FlatCAMApp import App File "/usr/home/bernt/vebbnerladdningar/flatcam/FlatCAMApp.py", line 18, in from ObjectCollection import * File "/usr/home/bernt/vebbnerladdningar/flatcam/ObjectCollection.py", line 2, in from FlatCAMObj import * File "/usr/home/bernt/vebbnerladdningar/flatcam/FlatCAMObj.py", line 5, in from camlib import * File "/usr/home/bernt/vebbnerladdningar/flatcam/camlib.py", line 15, in from matplotlib.figure import Figure File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/figure.py", line 38, in import matplotlib.colorbar as cbar File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/colorbar.py", line 34, in import matplotlib.collections as collections File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/collections.py", line 27, in import matplotlib.backend_bases as backend_bases File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/backend_bases.py", line 56, in import matplotlib.textpath as textpath File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/textpath.py", line 19, in import matplotlib.font_manager as font_manager File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/font_manager.py", line 1415, in _rebuild() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/font_manager.py", line 1400, in _rebuild fontManager = FontManager() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/font_manager.py", line 1059, in __init__ self.afmlist = createFontList(self.afmfiles, fontext='afm') File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/font_manager.py", line 568, in createFontList font = afm.AFM(fh) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/afm.py", line 346, in __init__ parse_afm(fh) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/afm.py", line 335, in parse_afm doptional = _parse_optional(fh) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/afm.py", line 317, in _parse_optional d[key] = optional[key](fh) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/afm.py", line 250, in _parse_kern_pairs c1, c2, val = _to_str(vals[1]), _to_str(vals[2]), _to_float(vals[3]) ValueError: could not convert string to float: B At the beginning this was the error python FlatCAM.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "FlatCAM.py", line 3, in from FlatCAMApp import App File "/usr/home/bernt/vebbnerladdningar/FlatCAM-8.3/FlatCAM-8.3/FlatCAMApp.py", line 18, in from ObjectCollection import * File "/usr/home/bernt/vebbnerladdningar/FlatCAM-8.3/FlatCAM-8.3/ObjectCollection.py", line 2, in from FlatCAMObj import * File "/usr/home/bernt/vebbnerladdningar/FlatCAM-8.3/FlatCAM-8.3/FlatCAMObj.py", line 5, in from camlib import * File "/usr/home/bernt/vebbnerladdningar/FlatCAM-8.3/FlatCAM-8.3/camlib.py", line 12, in from numpy import arctan2, Inf, array, sqrt, pi, ceil, sin, cos, dot, float32, \ File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/__init__.py", line 170, in from . import add_newdocs File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/add_newdocs.py", line 13, in from numpy.lib import add_newdoc File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/lib/__init__.py", line 18, in from .polynomial import * File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/lib/polynomial.py", line 19, in from numpy.linalg import eigvals, lstsq, inv File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/linalg/__init__.py", line 51, in from .linalg import * File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/linalg/linalg.py", line 29, in from numpy.linalg import lapack_lite, _umath_linalg ImportError: /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version GCC_4.6.0 required by /usr/local/lib/gcc48/libgfortran.so.3 not found From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 16:00:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02D19A3C4E for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 16:00:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AEA61A9E for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 16:00:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-207-98-175-216.knology.net [207.98.175.216] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t6GG0TN3028037 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:00:30 -0500 Message-ID: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:06:44 -0453 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Subject: 64-bit linux emulation Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 16:00:38 -0000 How is progress on this ? Handbook still says linux 64-bit binaries not supported, hopefully out of date :-) .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 16:58:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23809A3766 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 16:58:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x230.google.com (mail-ig0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD8101BCC for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 16:58:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: by iggp10 with SMTP id p10so17619263igg.0 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:58:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O3pItIy3V4H5wS2Df9ShmuKmBIyg2myKrObts7K9EUg=; b=GvW3pxKnyn7JJVohGmPSgm2QGoebyM4ErMs2xcd0Gv/vjGugezO9HK3br+nrZj5vHT Be+8SfnSXVEPf5vr5LX6iGxgIibO949w3geBW61tahj+u82Or6rVxIdnKmRTyjO+FgR+ 6R2PUCJ2xYYTG22Sl1C+5RA0sX224E4Lwqssk7tPLL6sC/pyDnxX1RaGxog6UA+4+7K8 LE1vij4TiKHZ2xIKLpwtkUENPdAjhPjZjp/Xniv3K7uFPy31PWzFOGfNyv2Za4gHhd0x gZPH2c0438YY9/ZUmhQpkb3DiskZPuRhCt1rkqIQUF9DAUkOhImKl6lg0Gf+x1PIdZ9R wmOg== X-Received: by 10.50.40.42 with SMTP id u10mr4444964igk.71.1437065921131; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:58:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([50.243.6.59]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id u35sm5367267iou.7.2015.07.16.09.58.40 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 09:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55A7E2B8.6090405@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:58:32 -0600 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit linux emulation References: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 16:58:42 -0000 On 07/16/2015 09:59 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > > How is progress on this ? Handbook still says linux 64-bit binaries > not supported, hopefully out of date :-) .... > > Hi Bill, if this turns out to be anything like Wine, (not meaning to diss wine - but it does have severe limitations), then it might not be so worth the effort. Since we are on the subject of emulation, why not just use Virtual Box in which to run Linux 64 bit? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 17:11:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51AC39A3B18 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:11:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from avasout07.plus.net (avasout07.plus.net [84.93.230.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B51B8121A for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:11:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([80.229.31.82]) by avasout07 with smtp id t58G1q0041mJoLY0158HAn; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 18:08:17 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=IdN6Ijea c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=cd0K7rcWwnZFf6xQxRobyA==:117 a=cd0K7rcWwnZFf6xQxRobyA==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=DGUKCM7wfUEA:10 a=zOBTXjUuO1YA:10 a=r77TgQKjGQsHNAKrUKIA:9 a=gZbpxnkM3yUA:10 a=3mDzux4s7P6zVX_n-_AA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=hadP5heuYXAA:10 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=PFKTbOOQZT95En3oyB4A:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13] helo=milibyte.co.uk) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZFmdr-0001rI-NC for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 18:08:16 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 18:08:14 +0100 Message-ID: <6911798.EzPSnWE832@curlew.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.1-RELEASE-p10; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <55A7E2B8.6090405@gmail.com> References: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> <55A7E2B8.6090405@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Subject: Re: 64-bit linux emulation X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:11:31 -0000 On Thursday 16 Jul 2015 10:58:32 jd1008 wrote: > Since we are on the subject of emulation, why not just use Virtual Box > in which to run Linux 64 bit? We'd still need emulation for things like nvidia drivers and flash plugin. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 17:19:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6049A3CA2 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:19:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x230.google.com (mail-ie0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36E4A198B for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:19:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: by iebmu5 with SMTP id mu5so60340468ieb.1 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:19:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Xc5txSry/A25OV/qD2XGBIecApt1vMRXmrCLPiBEyGI=; b=cUpMiA8V99EU+ws/7AEFjQHq9Ljesyo4Vmq1U2Dl2UckeY1EYTlIIdzPsjwfJ6F1wa gYyq7ALd/vHkEILIxBNwPQDh6sVHa5BIrWrgboq7c7XkzbGY6McV/cgSTwZlqxQXmcw9 euPcIZrWtfInGqarUul5Hz01uMaZIGAWOwLmoSdi+8uc7BABOag4yimjCVMeuu3OORd/ iuosG2c/vwDUJvQu5NWA3AANySszNe29bBqN4fTn0qOjAFnrDW3qp/YXvcJKXJH58zGZ G+2hJphf+nnziVVskb5MYzm0CJHYmP+6yUUMfxbR8C7+PZC9u3nGG47b7ZxdXarB+ZJ5 czFQ== X-Received: by 10.50.59.211 with SMTP id b19mr4874389igr.42.1437067146604; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:19:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([50.243.6.59]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l62sm5389080iol.36.2015.07.16.10.19.05 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 10:19:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55A7E788.2030904@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:19:04 -0600 From: jd1008 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit linux emulation References: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> <55A7E2B8.6090405@gmail.com> <6911798.EzPSnWE832@curlew.lan> In-Reply-To: <6911798.EzPSnWE832@curlew.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:19:07 -0000 On 07/16/2015 11:08 AM, Mike Clarke wrote: > On Thursday 16 Jul 2015 10:58:32 jd1008 wrote: > >> Since we are on the subject of emulation, why not just use > Virtual Box >> in which to run Linux 64 bit? > We'd still need emulation for things like nvidia drivers and flash > plugin. > Well, Linux does not depend on Nvidia per se', right? Even if you card is Nvidia, VB can use any of it's graphics drivers which (somehow) talk to the FBSD kernel graphics driver for display. Is that not how things are now? With respect to flash, many sites are switching to html5. The opensource flash plugin I used on Linux did not work well, and consumed 150% of CPU :) :) From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 18:03:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E105C9A37D1 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 18:03:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lacey.leanne@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pd0-x22e.google.com (mail-pd0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B429E1B1A for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 18:03:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lacey.leanne@gmail.com) Received: by pdbqm3 with SMTP id qm3so47996334pdb.0 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:03:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ERChyyIkpF76fpAcwMJYiMX07VRWONRIZ7Av922F7eQ=; b=RuhjaOGktHQLENI48gDY0H5AlKE0CZmfkcXpiB2LWtFLNJdqFnj3vtS9YlM3v47jCj qO7+z1wsmuJ9WTQOxt3ePsO2UMLyfGyzFdn+9n9pvBzolx3tcGVh3dcexmKS+9lmy5fl QnwJvbcKjNYZOCl10RtbUWjwRkEjfnDnVzxOT0hj6RK2X+e8+HvQjSCus2ivpqw7Vq7c oJ/wGdUc99rrudEGZI086nR4+E7RCHGAw/CqnZk3fCCcUfJLWG3LyxpoMtCVfmLT3XeA pNfx/ZMJatCZC8jr68h4wtO+Xq/xZm8Vvu7b6jXRW1lFp5LvwR3aoSX5e9PHPfkYQyMK Efnw== X-Received: by 10.68.191.167 with SMTP id gz7mr21242451pbc.43.1437069790218; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.86] ([162.247.40.130]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u2sm8592398pbs.88.2015.07.16.11.03.08 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:03:08 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55A7F1DA.7040106@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 11:03:06 -0700 From: Lacey Powers User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit linux emulation References: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 18:03:11 -0000 On 07/16/2015 08:59 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > > How is progress on this ? Handbook still says linux 64-bit binaries > not supported, hopefully out of date :-) .... > > Hello William, Looks like it's coming along, according to this Quarterly Report: https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2014-10-2014-12.html#Linux-Emulation-Layer,-the-Linuxulator And there are commits referencing the "64-bit Linuxulator" in svn, so you might have some support in 11-CURRENT? https://reviews.freebsd.org/search/query/N4Nlb6bNTrwA/#R Hope that helps answer your question. =) Regards, Lacey From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 19:20:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821069A3C08 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:20:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 322841C96 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:20:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-207-98-175-216.knology.net [207.98.175.216] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t6GJKUHu013362 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:20:31 -0500 Message-ID: <55A803FE.60004@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:26:45 -0453 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit linux emulation References: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> <55A7E2B8.6090405@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <55A7E2B8.6090405@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:20:33 -0000 On 07/16/15 12:04, jd1008 wrote: > > > On 07/16/2015 09:59 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> >> >> How is progress on this ? Handbook still says linux 64-bit binaries >> not supported, hopefully out of date :-) .... >> >> > Hi Bill, > if this turns out to be anything like Wine, > (not meaning to diss wine - but it does have severe limitations), > then it might not be so worth the effort. > > Since we are on the subject of emulation, why not just use Virtual Box > in which to run Linux 64 bit? I tried v-box early last fall & had fairly severe issues (crashed the whole machine) trying to run a 32-bit WinXP VM, so I kinda gave up on it. There have been *many* updates since then, maybe I should go back. If I understand things correctly, emulation *should* be a bit simpler to implement, & *seems* to be up & going under NetBSD, although I have yet to verify that 1st hand. I do have a QEMU 32-bit WinXP VM setup & mostly running, using qemu-devel, so I could try that as well. I may revisit v-box or QEMU, & I will verify what is going on under NetBSD, since I have a newly commissioned 64-bit NetBSD 6.1.5 server up & running. No huge issue, I was just curious about any possible progress on that capability. Thanks :-). -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 19:26:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2B59A3DF3 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:26:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 702C01058 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:26:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-207-98-175-216.knology.net [207.98.175.216] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t6GJQ3uY016010 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:26:04 -0500 Message-ID: <55A8054B.7060700@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:32:18 -0453 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit linux emulation References: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> <55A7F1DA.7040106@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <55A7F1DA.7040106@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:26:05 -0000 On 07/16/15 13:09, Lacey Powers wrote: > On 07/16/2015 08:59 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> >> >> How is progress on this ? Handbook still says linux 64-bit binaries >> not supported, hopefully out of date :-) .... >> >> > > Hello William, > > Looks like it's coming along, according to this Quarterly Report: > > https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2014-10-2014-12.html#Linux-Emulation-Layer,-the-Linuxulator > > > And there are commits referencing the "64-bit Linuxulator" in svn, so > you might have some support in 11-CURRENT? > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/search/query/N4Nlb6bNTrwA/#R > > Hope that helps answer your question. =) > > Regards, > > Lacey Hmmmmm .... well, sorta, I presume they would be back-ported to 9.3R, since that's what I'm running .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 19:26:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F229A3E2A for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:26:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x244.google.com (mail-wi0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A4FA10F1 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:26:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by widjy10 with SMTP id jy10so2388850wid.1 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:26:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=05uMBVZvr9C2PM32IkafgcY9Xd3YFba4uzktlLTTGSI=; b=DaibH7O/hY7MbjPM9uvM05DdORWvWd0zvOc4P/z+ObY/owMu5d34ze3D4QiNpfbZjS UjVkE7uqlvpSapIExVwrrAs2v12LCzyWlIgzfgIv9+ibF0DIKuQQUHMHmn8DsQHONqI0 mBNENsZBfZwQm4ntwTx05Pps66wFnh9wYKKIbLQaD21rkzS8bNmZWRzHY+Ldpw7nFLLx 5fdETiDBswbGhhT8droyaOvo6RbDoj0NzAym+hn48cq4nB1sQSbIMsqfkMmZDk0TYvjE MrHtwoeGjP4vJJJx0bbWRHP2NX1rkgWNR8JJVqsMhAvPd2+8aiAJX70fNFhr3YCs3bg+ HNkg== X-Received: by 10.180.77.200 with SMTP id u8mr9823190wiw.70.1437074809554; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:26:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (5ec1f672.skybroadband.com. [94.193.246.114]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fm8sm4753821wib.9.2015.07.16.12.26.47 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 12:26:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 20:26:44 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit linux emulation Message-ID: <20150716202644.55cbf79b@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <6911798.EzPSnWE832@curlew.lan> References: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> <55A7E2B8.6090405@gmail.com> <6911798.EzPSnWE832@curlew.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.27; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:26:51 -0000 On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 18:08:14 +0100 Mike Clarke wrote: > On Thursday 16 Jul 2015 10:58:32 jd1008 wrote: > > > Since we are on the subject of emulation, why not just use > Virtual Box > > in which to run Linux 64 bit? > > We'd still need emulation for things like nvidia drivers and flash > plugin. The binary nvidia driver is a native FreeBSD driver, the linux dependencies are just there so it can work with linux applications. The 32-bit flash plugin works on 64-bit FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 19:39:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B819A4379 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:39:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79E4816A2 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:39:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id t6GJdv2I062673 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 13:39:57 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t6GJdvOJ062670; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 13:39:57 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 13:39:57 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: "William A. Mahaffey III" cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit linux emulation In-Reply-To: <55A8054B.7060700@hiwaay.net> Message-ID: References: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> <55A7F1DA.7040106@gmail.com> <55A8054B.7060700@hiwaay.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 13:39:57 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:39:59 -0000 On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 07/16/15 13:09, Lacey Powers wrote: >> On 07/16/2015 08:59 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>> >>> >>> How is progress on this ? Handbook still says linux 64-bit binaries not >>> supported, hopefully out of date :-) .... >>> >>> >> >> Hello William, >> >> Looks like it's coming along, according to this Quarterly Report: >> >> https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2014-10-2014-12.html#Linux-Emulation-Layer,-the-Linuxulator >> >> And there are commits referencing the "64-bit Linuxulator" in svn, so you >> might have some support in 11-CURRENT? >> >> https://reviews.freebsd.org/search/query/N4Nlb6bNTrwA/#R >> >> Hope that helps answer your question. =) >> >> Regards, >> >> Lacey > > > Hmmmmm .... well, sorta, I presume they would be back-ported to 9.3R, since > that's what I'm running .... VirtualBox works well on 10-STABLE, provided you accept the default virtual hardware. On 10.1, too, I think. Do you have something that needs an old version of FreeBSD? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 19:54:09 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402959A477D for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:54:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DBC51477 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:54:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-207-98-175-216.knology.net [207.98.175.216] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t6GJs6wq031324 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:54:07 -0500 Message-ID: <55A80BDE.6010604@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:00:21 -0453 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit linux emulation References: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> <55A7F1DA.7040106@gmail.com> <55A8054B.7060700@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:54:09 -0000 On 07/16/15 14:46, Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> On 07/16/15 13:09, Lacey Powers wrote: >>> On 07/16/2015 08:59 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> How is progress on this ? Handbook still says linux 64-bit binaries >>>> not supported, hopefully out of date :-) .... >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Hello William, >>> >>> Looks like it's coming along, according to this Quarterly Report: >>> >>> https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2014-10-2014-12.html#Linux-Emulation-Layer,-the-Linuxulator >>> >>> And there are commits referencing the "64-bit Linuxulator" in svn, >>> so you might have some support in 11-CURRENT? >>> >>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/search/query/N4Nlb6bNTrwA/#R >>> >>> Hope that helps answer your question. =) >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Lacey >> >> >> Hmmmmm .... well, sorta, I presume they would be back-ported to 9.3R, >> since that's what I'm running .... > > VirtualBox works well on 10-STABLE, provided you accept the default > virtual hardware. On 10.1, too, I think. Do you have something that > needs an old version of FreeBSD? That's what I installed when I built the box, website said supported through end of 2016, which I liked. I found some online references back then which were not overly flattering about clang vs. gcc, much (50+ %) slower compiled code, other issues, so I went with 9.3R. I was & am looking for stability & as much performance as I can get out of my puny-ish (AMD sempron 3850) CPU & gfx. Different versions of VBox on 10 vs. 9.3R ? -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 20:57:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE009A35A9 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 20:57:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.70.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECAE21A7F for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 20:57:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7321ACB8C9F; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:56:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 128.135.70.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:56:55 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <56442.128.135.70.2.1437080215.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: References: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> <55A7F1DA.7040106@gmail.com> <55A8054B.7060700@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 15:56:55 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: 64-bit linux emulation From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "Warren Block" Cc: "William A. Mahaffey III" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 20:57:02 -0000 On Thu, July 16, 2015 2:39 pm, Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> On 07/16/15 13:09, Lacey Powers wrote: >>> On 07/16/2015 08:59 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> How is progress on this ? Handbook still says linux 64-bit binaries >>>> not >>>> supported, hopefully out of date :-) .... >>>> >>>> >>> >>> Hello William, >>> >>> Looks like it's coming along, according to this Quarterly Report: >>> >>> https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2014-10-2014-12.html#Linux-Emulation-Layer,-the-Linuxulator >>> >>> And there are commits referencing the "64-bit Linuxulator" in svn, so >>> you >>> might have some support in 11-CURRENT? >>> >>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/search/query/N4Nlb6bNTrwA/#R >>> >>> Hope that helps answer your question. =) >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Lacey >> >> >> Hmmmmm .... well, sorta, I presume they would be back-ported to 9.3R, >> since >> that's what I'm running .... > > VirtualBox works well on 10-STABLE, provided you accept the default > virtual hardware. On 10.1, too, I think. I confirm VirtualBox works perfectly on FreeBSD 10.1. As a matter of fact I never had problems with it; used on 9.3, 10.0, 10.1 (guest systems: Windows XP, 7, FreeBSD 8, 9, 10, CentOS 5, 6, 7, Fedora 5, 13, 16, 20, Ubuntu 10, 14, OpenBSD 4.9, Debian 7, ReactOS,... - list is not complete) Valeri ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 21:13:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD189A3878 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:13:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjuanino@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x244.google.com (mail-ig0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C26410DC for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:13:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjuanino@gmail.com) Received: by igbc1 with SMTP id c1so1908223igb.3 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:13:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=w2t1541bElOoH5lU7jDMuOWqq4uuXDCjh8hJGMLABpo=; b=b7qI1lCCXLkgsdzOz1aOSywGsu/+27KjrGtPNwGjdPr5W9tcwenyPv19uIr3/P61Ym 2aUqDaBRnMZRRaIQLgKfPjPr+Yct0p6i9aX/CxwOTVUiZ5c8ksFioKKyLF2Fz0Mj6Hi7 qvaa2IwOCFeDEiaVB5KBbencRgPCrDSvJyakqfFaegJCpZtfCKUY0E6iwxN9OEI6/i20 m3AXQ28ymWhN7hWC08hdRzmq5te6ey+SiPJXhL3amEUGqy1/aNH3oo6jfAk6a/ktKBVD aFVewLjIyp2pwHP1SWiTaIaeUtJBDu5JCwjf+Bex0pm7Bx0EYFt4UfabRz6aZkRmJ3CI X1XQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.43.226 with SMTP id z2mr7242397igl.65.1437081181969; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:13:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.15.234 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:13:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <56442.128.135.70.2.1437080215.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> References: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> <55A7F1DA.7040106@gmail.com> <55A8054B.7060700@hiwaay.net> <56442.128.135.70.2.1437080215.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 23:13:01 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 64-bit linux emulation From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9zw6kgR2FyY8OtYSBKdWFuaW5v?= To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu Cc: Warren Block , "William A. Mahaffey III" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:13:02 -0000 On 16 July 2015 at 22:56, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > I confirm VirtualBox works perfectly on FreeBSD 10.1. As a matter of fact > I never had problems with it; used on 9.3, 10.0, 10.1 (guest systems: > Windows XP, 7, FreeBSD 8, 9, 10, CentOS 5, 6, 7, Fedora 5, 13, 16, 20, > Ubuntu 10, 14, OpenBSD 4.9, Debian 7, ReactOS,... - list is not complete) Hi, I confirm also this claim: FreeBSD 10.1 in Virtualbox is very stable and works very well as workstation: vtnet net driver works at the same level as the native Windows drivers in terms of speed and stability, and at I/O level I do not notice much difference with the Windows native performance. X window system, with virtualbox driver also performs very well with no problem at all. Clipboard sharing also works as expected, etc etc. The host operating system is Windows 7 64 bits, 8GB RAM, core I5. I am very happy with this scenario, as I have the best of the two worlds: Windows and FreeBSD (yes, Windows has some specifics advantages in some corporate environments). And I am not an ocassional user: I run the combo Windows 7 + Virtualbox + FreeBSD every day in my company. Only I have suffered some sporadic issues, but almost never FreeBSD related but Virtualbox related (and fixed very soon by VirtualBox upstream, though). Regards From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 21:36:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8FE59A3BF0 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:36:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bret.busby@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x242.google.com (mail-ob0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A70381CF9 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:36:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bret.busby@gmail.com) Received: by obbha12 with SMTP id ha12so3585157obb.3 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:36:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WAuud4cc9RHPlZreAhTia7R2gGRAlAiSHXhZDC6HF7k=; b=a71qGZZl7Oda9hqUvRd9+69/0ll2sz2UJLxQ9cqPSUa2ayPVdinv884nksgCbNdSsh DHqCVTEEA7O+h4MCoqD6v+zA0kqam+KKUHCWB3GfbTjgc6oYk6B5VNJC/+j5VhwU5oWK SpW2+4VntWSPqPvNPQNJkX14kaiBZVoNIRNN+Trw93UoD2+YKJpIT0i7qP81YGPU6CRS EPaDocU1CzzO8o1OH+6XeyHxV9riDhy67i5lvOwJfGnYWdWUXOOJt7Y6QeB3orzXfvnb eLqrx1myTPbfv0yuH9DQNCrVFrLthKyNmU7EbxIlx3tDgepBIAwlwGgMbIC3q7OGXxNf lkKw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.1.67 with SMTP id 64mr10093490oib.6.1437082580761; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:36:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.202.65.133 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 14:36:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 05:36:20 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Well and truly off-topic - was Re: 64-bit linux emulation From: Bret Busby To: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:36:21 -0000 On 16/07/2015, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war > ever devised by man." > -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list I realise that this is well and truly off-topic, but, the above quote appears to be consistently in the signature of the poster (rather than something that happened to slide in due to a rotating set of quotations), so, I am curious; without knowing when the quotation was made (when he supposedly said it), has a comparison ever been made and documented, between the M1 Garand, the L1A1, and the M14, and the SVT40? I realise that the first three are of the same ammunition and rimless, and the fourth involves rims, but, I am curious, as they appear fairly similar in functionality. Any responses are probably best sent to me, off-list, due to the off-topic nature of the question. And, to the List Administrator(s); please excuse this so completely off-topic posting, but, with the assertion above, having been posted, my curiosity is piqued. -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .............. "So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll know what the answer means." - Deep Thought, Chapter 28 of Book 1 of "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: A Trilogy In Four Parts", written by Douglas Adams, published by Pan Books, 1992 .................................................... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 22:28:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC7009A44A6 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 22:28:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.70.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9904C18F7 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 22:28:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id 82C36CB8CA3; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:28:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 128.135.70.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:28:06 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <53344.128.135.70.2.1437085686.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:28:06 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: Well and truly off-topic - was Re: 64-bit linux emulation From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "Bret Busby" Cc: "FreeBSD Questions !!!!" Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 22:28:07 -0000 On Thu, July 16, 2015 4:36 pm, Bret Busby wrote: > On 16/07/2015, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > > > >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war >> ever devised by man." >> -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > I realise that this is well and truly off-topic, but, the above quote > appears to be consistently in the signature of the poster (rather than > something that happened to slide in due to a rotating set of > quotations), so, I am curious; without knowing when the quotation was > made (when he supposedly said it), has a comparison ever been made and > documented, between the M1 Garand, the L1A1, and the M14, and the > SVT40? I realise that the first three are of the same ammunition and > rimless, and the fourth involves rims, but, I am curious, as they > appear fairly similar in functionality. > > Any responses are probably best sent to me, off-list, due to the > off-topic nature of the question. > > And, to the List Administrator(s); please excuse this so completely > off-topic posting, but, with the assertion above, having been posted, > my curiosity is piqued. > And if whoever responds includes me in responses too, or, Bret, if you kindly forward them to me, that would be great: I'm curious as well. Thanks! Valeri > -- > Bret Busby > Armadale > West Australia > .............. > > "So once you do know what the question actually is, > you'll know what the answer means." > - Deep Thought, > Chapter 28 of Book 1 of > "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: > A Trilogy In Four Parts", > written by Douglas Adams, > published by Pan Books, 1992 > > .................................................... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jul 16 23:20:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C442E9A4C69 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 23:20:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9063E1126 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 23:20:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wam@hiwaay.net) Received: from kabini1.local (dynamic-207-98-175-216.knology.net [207.98.175.216] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id t6GNKl7J018200 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 18:20:47 -0500 Message-ID: <55A83C4E.1000502@hiwaay.net> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 18:27:01 -0453 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 64-bit linux emulation References: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> <55A7F1DA.7040106@gmail.com> <55A8054B.7060700@hiwaay.net> <56442.128.135.70.2.1437080215.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <56442.128.135.70.2.1437080215.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 23:20:49 -0000 On 07/16/15 16:03, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Thu, July 16, 2015 2:39 pm, Warren Block wrote: >> >On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >> > >>> >>On 07/16/15 13:09, Lacey Powers wrote: >>>> >>>On 07/16/2015 08:59 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>How is progress on this ? Handbook still says linux 64-bit binaries >>>>> >>>>not >>>>> >>>>supported, hopefully out of date:-) .... >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>>Hello William, >>>> >>> >>>> >>>Looks like it's coming along, according to this Quarterly Report: >>>> >>> >>>> >>>https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2014-10-2014-12.html#Linux-Emulation-Layer,-the-Linuxulator >>>> >>> >>>> >>>And there are commits referencing the "64-bit Linuxulator" in svn, so >>>> >>>you >>>> >>>might have some support in 11-CURRENT? >>>> >>> >>>> >>>https://reviews.freebsd.org/search/query/N4Nlb6bNTrwA/#R >>>> >>> >>>> >>>Hope that helps answer your question. =) >>>> >>> >>>> >>>Regards, >>>> >>> >>>> >>>Lacey >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>Hmmmmm .... well, sorta, I presume they would be back-ported to 9.3R, >>> >>since >>> >>that's what I'm running .... >> > >> >VirtualBox works well on 10-STABLE, provided you accept the default >> >virtual hardware. On 10.1, too, I think. > I confirm VirtualBox works perfectly on FreeBSD 10.1. As a matter of fact > I never had problems with it; used on 9.3, 10.0, 10.1 (guest systems: > Windows XP, 7, FreeBSD 8, 9, 10, CentOS 5, 6, 7, Fedora 5, 13, 16, 20, > Ubuntu 10, 14, OpenBSD 4.9, Debian 7, ReactOS,... - list is not complete) > > Valeri > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Valeri Galtsev > Sr System Administrator > Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics > Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics > University of Chicago > Phone: 773-702-4247 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Hmmmmm .... Could well have been pilot error on my end, certainly wouldn't be the 1st time :-/. I *think* I took all defaults except for HDD size & amount of RAM assigned, but nothing else. I posted some questions back in that time frame (Fall 2014), but no resolution. I'll look at it again, it would be *sweet* if it would work fairly seamlessly w/ 32-bit WinXP, 64-bit Win7, maybe some 64-SuSE LTS .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 17 00:05:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7BF9A36CE for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.70.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3201948 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:05:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id 2EA88CB8C9F; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:05:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 128.135.70.2 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:05:15 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <36947.128.135.70.2.1437091515.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:05:15 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Re: 64-bit linux emulation From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal References: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> <55A7F1DA.7040106@gmail.com> <55A8054B.7060700@hiwaay.net> <56442.128.135.70.2.1437080215.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <55A83C4E.1000502@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: <55A83C4E.1000502@hiwaay.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:05:16 -0000 On Thu, July 16, 2015 6:20 pm, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 07/16/15 16:03, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> On Thu, July 16, 2015 2:39 pm, Warren Block wrote: >>> >On Thu, 16 Jul 2015, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>> > >>>> >>On 07/16/15 13:09, Lacey Powers wrote: >>>>> >>>On 07/16/2015 08:59 AM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>>How is progress on this ? Handbook still says linux 64-bit >>>>>> binaries >>>>>> >>>>not >>>>>> >>>>supported, hopefully out of date:-) .... >>>>>> >>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>Hello William, >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>Looks like it's coming along, according to this Quarterly Report: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2014-10-2014-12.html#Linux-Emulation-Layer,-the-Linuxulator >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>And there are commits referencing the "64-bit Linuxulator" in svn, >>>>> so >>>>> >>>you >>>>> >>>might have some support in 11-CURRENT? >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>https://reviews.freebsd.org/search/query/N4Nlb6bNTrwA/#R >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>Hope that helps answer your question. =) >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>Regards, >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>Lacey >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >>Hmmmmm .... well, sorta, I presume they would be back-ported to >>>> 9.3R, >>>> >>since >>>> >>that's what I'm running .... >>> > >>> >VirtualBox works well on 10-STABLE, provided you accept the default virtual hardware. On 10.1, too, I think. >> I confirm VirtualBox works perfectly on FreeBSD 10.1. As a matter of fact >> I never had problems with it; used on 9.3, 10.0, 10.1 (guest systems: Windows XP, 7, FreeBSD 8, 9, 10, CentOS 5, 6, 7, Fedora 5, 13, 16, 20, Ubuntu 10, 14, OpenBSD 4.9, Debian 7, ReactOS,... - list is not complete) > > Hmmmmm .... Could well have been pilot error on my end, certainly wouldn't be the 1st time :-/. I *think* I took all defaults except for HDD size & amount of RAM assigned, but nothing else. I posted some questions back in that time frame (Fall 2014), but no resolution. I'll look at it again, it would be *sweet* if it would work fairly seamlessly w/ 32-bit WinXP, 64-bit Win7, maybe some 64-SuSE LTS .... > I probably should say something about the box I've listed these host systems and vbox guest systems I run on (I hope, it may give you some clues about what happened in your case): root@point:~ # sysctl -a | egrep -i 'hw.machine|hw.model|hw.ncpu' hw.machine: amd64 hw.model: Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2378 hw.ncpu: 8 hw.machine_arch: amd64 root@point:~ # sysctl -a | egrep -i 'memory' Virtual Memory: (Total: 18894936K Active: 18819128K) Real Memory: (Total: 2607240K Active: 2394088K) Shared Virtual Memory: (Total: 259468K Active: 242368K) Shared Real Memory: (Total: 52344K Active: 51300K) Free Memory: 10305512K hw.cbb.start_memory: 2281701376 p1003_1b.memory_protection: 0 p1003_1b.shared_memory_objects: 200112 root@point:~ # uname -a FreeBSD point.uchicago.edu 10.1-RELEASE-p9 FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p9 #2 r282515: Wed May 6 11:00:31 CDT 2015 valeri@point.uchicago.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 (this same box run earlier 9.3 and 10.0 RELEASE) This box has 3ware 9750 RAID controller with 8 drives in RAID-6 configuration, with cache it is fast enough, still I never run more that 3 different virtual machines simultaneously, 1 or 2 usually. (otherwise storage throughput may become bothleneck I think). VMs usually have rather generic amount of RAM: 2GB or 1GB, only Windows7 has 8GB; whatever I run, host system definitely has more than 2GB left for itself (not that I mean to say it needs this amount). Originally (on 9.3 and 10.0) I was building vbox from port; on 10.1 (or at some point on 10.0) I have it installed using pkg. Also, the box has pretty good dual socket tyan systemboard: S3992 if my memory doesn't fail me. And RAM is from good source, never had problems with their ram. (Not that I love myself this much, just when my workstation died I decided not to spend money on replacement, but put in the box spare parts I had on the shelf for servers... if one of them is needed for a server, there goes my workstation... pretty noisy beast too). BTW, if any system crashes my first suspect would be RAM, - but it's probably just me: I usually run RELEASE, nothing experimental. I hope, this helps. Valeri > > -- > > William A. Mahaffey III > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war > ever devised by man." > -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 17 00:45:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA9FC9A3DF3 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:45:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ggroth@gregs-garage.com) Received: from mail.gregs-garage.com (99-158-164-253.uvs.cicril.sbcglobal.net [99.158.164.253]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 793071A71 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:45:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ggroth@gregs-garage.com) Received: from mail.gregs-garage.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gregs-garage.com (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTP id t6H0jAEo052250 for ; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:45:11 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ggroth@gregs-garage.com) Received: (from www@localhost) by mail.gregs-garage.com (8.15.2/8.15.1/Submit) id t6H0jAnF052249; Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:45:10 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ggroth@gregs-garage.com) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.gregs-garage.com: www set sender to ggroth@gregs-garage.com using -f To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kerberos X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:rcube.php MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 19:45:10 -0500 From: Greg Groth In-Reply-To: <1383995814.37100404.1437030764957.JavaMail.zimbra@logitravel.com> References: <75d664eeb361264e9b4560a89b1a32bf@mail.gregs-garage.com> <1383995814.37100404.1437030764957.JavaMail.zimbra@logitravel.com> Message-ID: <4582000dcfad2dc26ca4076d2024f23f@mail.gregs-garage.com> X-Sender: ggroth@gregs-garage.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.2 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.gregs-garage.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 00:45:19 -0000 On 2015-07-16 02:12, Raimund Sacherer wrote: > Hello Greg, > >> C:\Windows\system32>ktpass -princ >> HTTP/ad01.example.local@EXAMPLE.LOCAL >> -mapuser aduser -pass P@$$word -ptype KRB5_NT_PRINCIPAL -out >> :\temp\krb5.keytab > > For what its worth, we have a couple of servers authenticating against > an 2012 domain and we create the key tab file like this: > setspn -A HTTP/service.host.name windowsusername > > ktpass -out key.tab -princ HTTP/service.host.name@EXAMPLE.LOCAL > -mapUser windowsuser -mapOp set -pass password -crypto RC4-HMAC-NT > -pType KRB5_NT_PRINCIPAL > > > At times we have instead of RC4-HMAC-NT set ALL. > > Hope this helps, > > best Many, many thanks for answering. I tried the following from the commandline on the 2012 DC as Admin: C:\setspn -A HTTP/ad01.example.local aduser Checking domain DC=example,DC=local Registering ServicePrincipalNames for CN=ADUSER,CN=Users,DC=example,DC=local HTTP/ad01.example.local Updated object C:\ktpass -out C:\temp\krb5.keytab -princ HTTP/aduser.example.local@EXAMPLE.LOCAL -mapUser aduser -mapOp set -pass P@$$word -crypto RC4-HMAC-NT -pType KRB5_NT_PRINCIPAL Targeting domain controller: AD01.example.local Using legacy password setting method Successfully mapped HTTP/aduser.example.local to aduser. Key created. Output keytab to C:\temp\krb5.keytab: Keytab version: 0x502 keysize 80 HTTP/aduser.example.local@EXAMPLE.LOCAL ptype 1 (KRB5_NT_PRINCIPAL) vno 29 etype 0x17 (RC4-HMAC) keylength 16 (0x923174d28eac78c4c29e92663ad82c2e) Copied the keytab to the /etc on the FreeBSD box (chown root:wheel / chmod600) and tried the following as root: root@BSD01:/ # kinit -k aduser kinit: krb5_get_init_creds: Already tried ENC-TS-info, looping ("root@BSD01:/ # kinit -t /etc/krb5.keytab aduser" returns the same) if I try a bogus user: root@BSD01:/ # kinit -k bogususer kinit: krb5_get_init_creds: Client (bogususer@EXAMPLE.LOCAL) unknown It looks like it's communicating, and locating the user correctly, but something is going awry with the authentication? I've reset the password on the AD multiple times, and have verified I can log onto a workstation located in the "EXAMPLE" domain with the "aduser" credentials. Are there perhaps other permissions that need to be assigned on the DC to "aduser" in order to get this to work? Best regards, Greg Groth From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 17 07:37:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71E29A44B2 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 07:37:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from douhisi.pair.com (douhisi.pair.com [209.68.5.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92DC51194 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 07:37:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from [10.2.2.1] (pool-173-48-121-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [173.48.121.235]) by douhisi.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1D3363F934 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 03:36:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <55A8B09A.7000200@sneakertech.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 03:36:58 -0400 From: Quartz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: [OT] anyone know of a GOOD Windows help forum? References: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> <55A7F1DA.7040106@gmail.com> <55A8054B.7060700@hiwaay.net> <56442.128.135.70.2.1437080215.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 07:37:06 -0000 >> I confirm VirtualBox works perfectly on FreeBSD 10.1. As a matter of fact > Hi, I confirm also this claim: FreeBSD 10.1 in Virtualbox is very > stable and works very well as workstation: vtnet net driver works at While we're on the topic of VirtualBox: I've just spent the last week banging my head against the wall trying to figure out a Windows 7 issue in VB. Today I double checked my sanity by installing fresh on raw hardware only to discover that my problem appears to be a Win7 design flaw or something and not related to VB at all. Anyone know of a GOOD mailing list or forum for figuring out real system issues with Windows? In other words, somewhere that can tell me something besides the generic "disable antivirus / safeboot / re-install" "solutions" that are always thrown around? (My problem is reproducible with a virgin install, so either it's a bug or I'm crazy). From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 17 08:01:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080B09A4B37 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:01:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexandre_ml@outlook.fr) Received: from DUB004-OMC3S22.hotmail.com (dub004-omc3s22.hotmail.com [157.55.2.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9D3C12F3 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:01:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexandre_ml@outlook.fr) Received: from DUB118-W11 ([157.55.2.7]) by DUB004-OMC3S22.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 01:00:03 -0700 X-TMN: [5obJHSfO3RJc82YrjZR1OFgG57f5E0zQ] X-Originating-Email: [alexandre_ml@outlook.fr] Message-ID: From: Alexandre Labarre To: Quartz CC: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: RE: [OT] anyone know of a GOOD Windows help forum? Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:00:03 +0200 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <55A8B09A.7000200@sneakertech.com> References: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> <55A7F1DA.7040106@gmail.com>, <55A8054B.7060700@hiwaay.net>, , <56442.128.135.70.2.1437080215.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu>, , <55A8B09A.7000200@sneakertech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 17 Jul 2015 08:00:03.0776 (UTC) FILETIME=[967DAC00:01D0C066] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:01:25 -0000 > Date: Fri=2C 17 Jul 2015 03:36:58 -0400 > From: quartz@sneakertech.com > CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: [OT] anyone know of a GOOD Windows help forum? >=20 > >> I confirm VirtualBox works perfectly on FreeBSD 10.1. As a matter of f= act >=20 > > Hi=2C I confirm also this claim: FreeBSD 10.1 in Virtualbox is very > > stable and works very well as workstation: vtnet net driver works at >=20 > While we're on the topic of VirtualBox: I've just spent the last week=20 > banging my head against the wall trying to figure out a Windows 7 issue=20 > in VB. Today I double checked my sanity by installing fresh on raw=20 > hardware only to discover that my problem appears to be a Win7 design=20 > flaw or something and not related to VB at all. >=20 > Anyone know of a GOOD mailing list or forum for figuring out real system= =20 > issues with Windows? In other words=2C somewhere that can tell me=20 > something besides the generic "disable antivirus / safeboot /=20 > re-install" "solutions" that are always thrown around? (My problem is=20 > reproducible with a virgin install=2C so either it's a bug or I'm crazy). >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe=2C send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd= .org" Hi Quartz=2C The official Microsoft forum is here http://answers.microsoft.com HTH Regards. Alexandre = From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 17 09:10:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF467996818 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:10:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sabine_baer@t-online.de) Received: from mailout07.t-online.de (mailout07.t-online.de [194.25.134.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailout00.t-online.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90A7118FA for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:10:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sabine_baer@t-online.de) Received: from fwd04.aul.t-online.de (fwd04.aul.t-online.de [172.20.26.149]) by mailout07.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DBC84C22CA; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:00:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.0.234] (Z6Ns9BZ1QhgtyezprL5HKFTK2DLEaJ9ZyBKhphMvlfnG8yxpl4zU1SKRdOKU1-8wCv@[84.128.225.2]) by fwd04.t-online.de with (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) esmtp id 1ZG1Uv-0dCZI80; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:00:01 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: [OT] anyone know of a GOOD Windows help forum? From: Sabine Baer In-Reply-To: <55A8B09A.7000200@sneakertech.com> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:59:56 +0200 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5BD1CA6F-7F31-4CDA-9F48-30C4A4005D33@t-online.de> References: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> <55A7F1DA.7040106@gmail.com> <55A8054B.7060700@hiwaay.net> <56442.128.135.70.2.1437080215.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <55A8B09A.7000200@sneakertech.com> To: Quartz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) X-ID: Z6Ns9BZ1QhgtyezprL5HKFTK2DLEaJ9ZyBKhphMvlfnG8yxpl4zU1SKRdOKU1-8wCv X-TOI-MSGID: 189aac75-3c84-457a-8b2d-3524f94ef14c X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:10:10 -0000 On Jul 17, 2015, at 9:36 AM, Quartz wrote: >>> I confirm VirtualBox works perfectly on FreeBSD 10.1. As a matter of = fact >=20 >> Hi, I confirm also this claim: FreeBSD 10.1 in Virtualbox is very >> stable and works very well as workstation: vtnet net driver works at >=20 > While we're on the topic of VirtualBox: I've just spent the last week = banging my head against the wall trying to figure out a Windows 7 issue = in VB. Today I double checked my sanity by installing fresh on raw = hardware only to discover that my problem appears to be a Win7 design = flaw or something and not related to VB at all. >=20 > Anyone know of a GOOD mailing list or forum for figuring out real = system issues with Windows? In other words, somewhere that can tell me = something besides the generic "disable antivirus / safeboot / = re-install" "solutions" that are always thrown around? (My problem is = reproducible with a virgin install, so either it's a bug or I'm crazy). A long time ago microsoft had it's own newsserver, but the groups still = exist on some servers, e.g. news.individual.de or = news.eternal-september.org. The hierarchy is long and I do not know if you will find an appropriate = group but it's worth to talk about. Sabine= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 17 10:05:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D779A214B for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raimund.sacherer@logitravel.com) Received: from formentor.toolfactory.net (pina.toolfactory.net [213.97.158.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC797117F for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:05:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raimund.sacherer@logitravel.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by formentor.toolfactory.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECCF17819E; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:05:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from formentor.toolfactory.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (formentor.toolfactory.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 3DS3kQL4a8OO; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:04:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by formentor.toolfactory.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1965178194; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:04:59 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at logpmzimmta01v.toolfactory.net Received: from formentor.toolfactory.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (formentor.toolfactory.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id k-HSRzO6nSZB; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:04:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from xorrigo.toolfactory.net (xorrigo.toolfactory.net [192.168.2.210]) by formentor.toolfactory.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B876B177FDE; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:04:59 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:04:58 +0200 (CEST) From: Raimund Sacherer Reply-To: Raimund Sacherer To: Greg Groth Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1705342318.38348913.1437127498114.JavaMail.zimbra@logitravel.com> In-Reply-To: <4582000dcfad2dc26ca4076d2024f23f@mail.gregs-garage.com> References: <75d664eeb361264e9b4560a89b1a32bf@mail.gregs-garage.com> <1383995814.37100404.1437030764957.JavaMail.zimbra@logitravel.com> <4582000dcfad2dc26ca4076d2024f23f@mail.gregs-garage.com> Subject: Re: Kerberos MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [192.168.2.213] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.8_GA_6184 (ZimbraWebClient - SAF7 (Mac)/8.0.8_GA_6184) Thread-Topic: Kerberos Thread-Index: kX0MPBfWxeNDDZV2XZWOcsVSMP9YKQ== X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:05:10 -0000 Hello Greg, on a first glance I can't see anything really out of order, if it helps, I use(d) this pages to setup kerberos and apache auth: http://www.grolmsnet.de/kerbtut/ http://blog.scottlowe.org/2006/08/10/kerberos-based-sso-with-apache/ The account you create for the service principal has to be a user account, it does not work with a machine account. If you authenticate without the key tab, just a user from the ad (create a user and test a kinit user@EXAMPLE.COM, later klist). Check if a simple user authentication works in the first place. Hope that this will help you in any way, Best Ray From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 17 11:23:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724F39A326C for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yk0-x242.google.com (mail-yk0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B6E31BF3 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:23:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: by ykek23 with SMTP id k23so404193yke.0 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 04:23:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=s0zA875LT1TOzkyzVEG51ig9VFirnPPESP9s6EVLjM4=; b=Wrqv+/dUv97AQ5ZklZx/faI13qroFWf2/AyNKxedf0Xnc/co188mqAODPFwhz8Io1o hExZN2zg8wJgJDMGTm5vKSpKgCYAM1IkXeWookC177m/gnE6169/kh41H9mEl1l08zM5 j2QYdYr8eUP69t2wGAFow77qM90r+K1HZCePI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:organization:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=s0zA875LT1TOzkyzVEG51ig9VFirnPPESP9s6EVLjM4=; b=ZwTscPoL2BG8yyFATeStUvAkUAz1ThWPmVFnvZiYe/lxJOetyAbAiTyiosOp9Jh8+D MILtMx1kD/GaavMAPe8BlrVZly7JQS5A+jXQrIHKCxyFW/RrovxLF4fSwuSvGSKMSpzC fgvc6YZ2dDAgYqadb4+FUB7KQMD1SWzzCFWdjbf9bGVrDwKbvqgSA3O1PHaBnxn5vSyK oqpvfItYOswjAdmeoST944wLl1iZsXVvqY2qEyIp4X/AfcEwV+jps+GOGjzNb207M1xn 9GjzgXWcUBw2lDb1vLSkpKt9ojSh4Qhi1die7hSkP2Esxd6RluqLVy1+bYhdY6t6Fvka dfFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQltGXY8dcaSpJr3PqfVBsZ4Y00YDfCVMHG14kqthSgmpswXqTFWvumhjpsk3QRdHUJ9TG69 X-Received: by 10.13.195.66 with SMTP id f63mr15335956ywd.107.1437132211073; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 04:23:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-174-109-28-112.nc.res.rr.com. [174.109.28.112]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a128sm10544670ywf.48.2015.07.17.04.23.30 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 04:23:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3mXqns1vyqz3DljS for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 07:23:29 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at scorpio.seibercom.net Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 07:23:29 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD FreeBSD Subject: Re: [OT] anyone know of a GOOD Windows help forum? Message-ID: <20150717072329.245e3f69@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <5BD1CA6F-7F31-4CDA-9F48-30C4A4005D33@t-online.de> References: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> <55A7F1DA.7040106@gmail.com> <55A8054B.7060700@hiwaay.net> <56442.128.135.70.2.1437080215.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <55A8B09A.7000200@sneakertech.com> <5BD1CA6F-7F31-4CDA-9F48-30C4A4005D33@t-online.de> Reply-To: FreeBSD FreeBSD Organization: seibercom NET X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.27; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:23:32 -0000 On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:59:56 +0200, Sabine Baer stated: > > On Jul 17, 2015, at 9:36 AM, Quartz wrote: > > >>> I confirm VirtualBox works perfectly on FreeBSD 10.1. As a matter of > >>> fact > > > >> Hi, I confirm also this claim: FreeBSD 10.1 in Virtualbox is very > >> stable and works very well as workstation: vtnet net driver works at > > > > While we're on the topic of VirtualBox: I've just spent the last week > > banging my head against the wall trying to figure out a Windows 7 issue > > in VB. Today I double checked my sanity by installing fresh on raw > > hardware only to discover that my problem appears to be a Win7 design > > flaw or something and not related to VB at all. > > > > Anyone know of a GOOD mailing list or forum for figuring out real system > > issues with Windows? In other words, somewhere that can tell me something > > besides the generic "disable antivirus / safeboot / re-install" > > "solutions" that are always thrown around? (My problem is reproducible > > with a virgin install, so either it's a bug or I'm crazy). > > A long time ago microsoft had it's own newsserver, but the groups still > exist on some servers, e.g. news.individual.de or > news.eternal-september.org. The hierarchy is long and I do not know if you > will find an appropriate group but it's worth to talk about. > > Sabine You could try this URL also. It tends to be more technical. https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home -- Jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 17 12:58:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478289A2C52 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:58:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from g8kbvdave@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA36510BD for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from g8kbvdave@googlemail.com) Received: by wgkl9 with SMTP id l9so81609853wgk.1 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 05:58:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:date:mime-version:subject:message-id:priority:in-reply-to :references:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-description; bh=2zbx+akZGGs2aug5m6phG6lRYs0FsGral7Bdsyzaajg=; b=nvt+aBeB6xi/nSPNRxN3uH/iNicX1NRYhfZ24xwXnuWB0BmqpdCwFw5FJExBNGkk8z 0aaxUQv8G4UEyWtJX2Rt8hFnLXkp+atb5rGUide/izZbNELcYxwsVpMSS0labcZKIr3U qtDH+/NVWmPV3OSAnKhXvnAuxELQZuh7I8mTtr1n4Uu03exLkbP6153Wxe9VHG4ZX0at IrRyhhfP8heZT0mAEd5QC6VjgEYV0MZlzHHZAnKeQJPMNjNRe/YhcHU/K0iIlVAiClMi UeP0Gss19kHzxnnFu3MEd8BzZ0/W3C9jEMbYa0QJ4A1yVLWyOsBjLE43j1GeATWGe6Dk pjWw== X-Received: by 10.194.120.230 with SMTP id lf6mr31535909wjb.41.1437137933221; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 05:58:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.16.71] ([217.41.35.220]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id qq1sm18303873wjc.0.2015.07.17.05.58.51 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 05:58:52 -0700 (PDT) From: "Dave B" To: Jerry , FreeBSD FreeBSD Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 13:58:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [OT] anyone know of a GOOD Windows help forum? Message-ID: <55A8FC0A.31187.12E03DC@g8kbvdave.googlemail.com> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20150717072329.245e3f69@seibercom.net> References: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net>, <5BD1CA6F-7F31-4CDA-9F48-30C4A4005D33@t-online.de>, <20150717072329.245e3f69@seibercom.net> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.62) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:58:55 -0000 > On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 10:59:56 +0200, Sabine Baer stated: > > > > > On Jul 17, 2015, at 9:36 AM, Quartz wrote: > > > > >>> I confirm VirtualBox works perfectly on FreeBSD 10.1. As a > > >>> matter of fact > > > > > >> Hi, I confirm also this claim: FreeBSD 10.1 in Virtualbox is very > > >> stable and works very well as workstation: vtnet net driver > > >> works at > > > > > > While we're on the topic of VirtualBox: I've just spent the last > > > week banging my head against the wall trying to figure out a > > > Windows 7 issue in VB. Today I double checked my sanity by > > > installing fresh on raw hardware only to discover that my problem > > > appears to be a Win7 design flaw or something and not related to > > > VB at all. > > > > > > Anyone know of a GOOD mailing list or forum for figuring out real > > > system issues with Windows? In other words, somewhere that can > > > tell me something besides the generic "disable antivirus / > > > safeboot / re-install" "solutions" that are always thrown around? > > > (My problem is reproducible with a virgin install, so either it's > > > a bug or I'm crazy). > > > > A long time ago microsoft had it's own newsserver, but the groups > > still exist on some servers, e.g. news.individual.de or > > news.eternal-september.org. The hierarchy is long and I do not know > > if you will find an appropriate group but it's worth to talk about. > > > > Sabine > > You could try this URL also. It tends to be more technical. > > https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home > > -- > Jerry > > OK, so what is the problem? Maybe I or someone else here can point you in a suitable direction. W7 certainly has a few "features", but most of them can be worked arround. We need to know what version of W7. Starter, Home Premuim, Ultimate, and if 32 or 64 bit. Plus, the salient details of the hardware it's living (or trying to) on, CPU, RAM, desktop/laptop, make/model. etc... (Not all hardware is equal, sadly.) Send that off list if needed, so as not to overly polute this august establishment. The "Stack Overflow" website is pretty good, but can take some searching to get past the kiddies. Generally if you google the basic problem, such as "win7 usb port power management" you get prety good hits. Off list reply if needed. Regards. Dave B. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 17 16:52:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23849A4679 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:52:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@kraus-haus.org) Received: from mail-qk0-f181.google.com (mail-qk0-f181.google.com [209.85.220.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6486C1D80 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:52:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@kraus-haus.org) Received: by qkdv3 with SMTP id v3so73252045qkd.3 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:52:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from :in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=JRSIUFj/g69b6zw1d54RS+5sd0Uw2f+ndWgMI32d8X8=; b=Ik918E0xhHibPOcfFLOlXejTMUn6i2Gb34VYPjSwWFkatOzCDDmLOFIGznZgYhnb+e WRLEpperuM1mpHpHJACBsN7+9CSqstQFgyrhYTHC6gqngTK8GsC9fu+bPU2UbMH8O0d0 AIkUoV0mnacIMOG/HRhQCd+CDIloroPEGj5SFyI/Pixx428QVKnzyQibwmbxXr3shOvs lx5TvERR/vk4qYYnoYdp7/0DIkXLBsRUd1arBs5NIU60hurRN84pj+UuO3XZk+UmobRg 4jcruS4JeKY3BRYzI9pAuGyCtkMd0mnK+5hdNYdIJQdNsl7/SpH30xeU6yUHpIx3Lmiw MWXA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlyRqPBiHrYmVf3/ewoiCfcFOZ9dBePkoIB8JiMP/sVSHhEj8wchPTcsJE0fUv69ZVzpAZa X-Received: by 10.55.21.41 with SMTP id f41mr27831309qkh.48.1437151491904; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:44:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mbp-1.thecreativeadvantage.com (mail.thecreativeadvantage.com. [96.236.20.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b133sm6080412qhc.40.2015.07.17.09.44.50 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 09:44:50 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: 64-bit linux emulation From: Paul Kraus In-Reply-To: <55A83C4E.1000502@hiwaay.net> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 12:44:50 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <52102C1E-FD94-4027-B43C-9406436A4BB3@kraus-haus.org> References: <55A7D51D.1020605@hiwaay.net> <55A7F1DA.7040106@gmail.com> <55A8054B.7060700@hiwaay.net> <56442.128.135.70.2.1437080215.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> <55A83C4E.1000502@hiwaay.net> To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 16:52:48 -0000 On Jul 16, 2015, at 19:20, William A. Mahaffey III = wrote: > On 07/16/15 16:03, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> On Thu, July 16, 2015 2:39 pm, Warren Block wrote: >>> > >>> >VirtualBox works well on 10-STABLE, provided you accept the default >>> >virtual hardware. On 10.1, too, I think. >> I confirm VirtualBox works perfectly on FreeBSD 10.1. As a matter of = fact >> I never had problems with it; used on 9.3, 10.0, 10.1 (guest systems: >> Windows XP, 7, FreeBSD 8, 9, 10, CentOS 5, 6, 7, Fedora 5, 13, 16, = 20, >> Ubuntu 10, 14, OpenBSD 4.9, Debian 7, ReactOS,... - list is not = complete) > Hmmmmm .... Could well have been pilot error on my end, certainly = wouldn't be the 1st time :-/. I *think* I took all defaults except for = HDD size & amount of RAM assigned, but nothing else. I posted some = questions back in that time frame (Fall 2014), but no resolution. I'll = look at it again, it would be *sweet* if it would work fairly seamlessly = w/ 32-bit WinXP, 64-bit Win7, maybe some 64-SuSE LTS =85. I have been using VBox to run production VMs under FBSD 9.x and 10..x = for a couple years now. Some of the guests include: OpenSuSE 12 FBSD 9 and 10 Windows Server 2008 (Windows 7 kernel) Windows Server 2012 Windows 8 Pro Windows 8.1 Pro Ubunutu 14.04 LTS =85 and I=92m suer I=92m missing some :-) That is NOT to say that VBox is perfect. OpenSuSE 13 just would not work = on one specific server running FBSD 9 and (I think) VBox 4.1.x, and = there was the FBSD 9 and VBox 4.0.x system that would reliably corrupt = two specific VM=92s boot blocks, moved them to new VMDK files and the = problem stopped, never did figure our the root cause. But, in general, the combination of FBSD / ZFS / VBox has been very = stage and runs very well for me. -- Paul Kraus paul@kraus-haus.org From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 17 18:54:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D395A9A4BC4 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 18:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mfv@bway.net) Received: from smtp1.bway.net (smtp1.v6.bway.net [IPv6:2607:d300:1::27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0EC91DA6 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 18:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mfv@bway.net) Received: from gecko4 (host-216-220-115-102.dsl.bway.net [216.220.115.102]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m1316v@bway.net) by smtp1.bway.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96AE995882 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:53:56 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bway.net; s=mail; t=1437159236; bh=c0WJlq0XxbCfzHdtp5Akwvblusv9AIKQsmRPvr5Mns0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Reply-To; b=VjTkDgF3+6K1xYP2iH81ZtIG/mijFThokAgtFkFHv1nLqRctEDCtTy0dKuRgMW69h v/0qNl2RQq7zGrQddS9MKJ25h6C5zY+gKiPIcwT4rBXlYxqmbMRS8cS2xY8CaZFRaZ Icwt3DI8JL/alihKbMCUm/vd6NiezxGmj9kW/JNA= Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:53:56 -0400 From: mfv To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Sync Ports to Packages Message-ID: <20150717145356.612a3a1e@gecko4> Reply-To: mfv@bway.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 18:54:05 -0000 Hello, Am trying to write a script to keep my packages and ports in sync but have not been able to find a local file in the package system that contains the revision number of my last upgrade. Once that number is obtained it is possible to sync the port tree. The following script extracts the build number from the appropriate server but needs Internet access: https://gist.github.com/reedacartwright/8622973baf89b263a6d7 Is it possible to extract the same revision number from a local file? Any leads would be appreciated. Cheers ... __o _ \<,_ Marek (+)/ (+) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 17 19:21:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC3129A2075 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 19:21:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F9A1B34 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 19:21:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (router.lan [172.30.250.2]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DDE33C24; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:21:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 1F2C53983C; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:21:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: mfv Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sync Ports to Packages References: <20150717145356.612a3a1e@gecko4> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 15:21:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150717145356.612a3a1e@gecko4> (mfv@bway.net's message of "Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:53:56 -0400") Message-ID: <44mvyulhdx.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 19:21:45 -0000 mfv writes: > Am trying to write a script to keep my packages and ports in sync but > have not been able to find a local file in the package system that > contains the revision number of my last upgrade. Once that number is > obtained it is possible to sync the port tree. > > The following script extracts the build number from the appropriate > server but needs Internet access: > > https://gist.github.com/reedacartwright/8622973baf89b263a6d7 > > Is it possible to extract the same revision number from a local file? svnversion(1) From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 17 19:22:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A270E9A20A6 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 19:22:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DAAC1CC4 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 19:22:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from testbox.news4all.se (testbox.usenet4all.se [10.0.0.3]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id t6HJM1JZ066038 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 21:22:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <55A955E1.9070601@bananmonarki.se> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 21:22:09 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Python and matplotlib problems SOLVED. References: <55A7CFFC.4010900@bananmonarki.se> In-Reply-To: <55A7CFFC.4010900@bananmonarki.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 19:22:12 -0000 On 2015-07-16 17:38, Bernt Hansson wrote: > Hello list. > > Trying to get a python program to work on 10.1. > Got it working for a while on 9.3 but it stopped there too. > > This is the error I get when moving /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 out. > > > > python FlatCAM.py > EndFontMetrics0 ; N L55896 ; B 0 0 1000 1000 ;0 ;ted. All Rights > Reserved.. > EndFontMetricsPCC z 0 0 ; PCC caron 37 0 ;83 0 ; 0 ; 0 ; 0 ;ights > Reserved.Shannon is a trademark of Agfa Corporation. > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "FlatCAM.py", line 3, in > from FlatCAMApp import App > File "/usr/home/bernt/vebbnerladdningar/flatcam/FlatCAMApp.py", line > 18, in > from ObjectCollection import * > File > "/usr/home/bernt/vebbnerladdningar/flatcam/ObjectCollection.py", line > 2, in > from FlatCAMObj import * > File "/usr/home/bernt/vebbnerladdningar/flatcam/FlatCAMObj.py", line > 5, in > from camlib import * > File "/usr/home/bernt/vebbnerladdningar/flatcam/camlib.py", line 15, > in > from matplotlib.figure import Figure > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/figure.py", > line 38, in > import matplotlib.colorbar as cbar > File > "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/colorbar.py", line > 34, in > import matplotlib.collections as collections > File > "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/collections.py", > line 27, in > import matplotlib.backend_bases as backend_bases > File > "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/backend_bases.py", > line 56, in > import matplotlib.textpath as textpath > File > "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/textpath.py", line > 19, in > import matplotlib.font_manager as font_manager > File > "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/font_manager.py", > line 1415, in > _rebuild() > File > "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/font_manager.py", > line 1400, in _rebuild > fontManager = FontManager() > File > "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/font_manager.py", > line 1059, in __init__ > self.afmlist = createFontList(self.afmfiles, fontext='afm') > File > "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/font_manager.py", > line 568, in createFontList > font = afm.AFM(fh) > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/afm.py", > line 346, in __init__ > parse_afm(fh) > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/afm.py", > line 335, in parse_afm > doptional = _parse_optional(fh) > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/afm.py", > line 317, in _parse_optional > d[key] = optional[key](fh) > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib/afm.py", > line 250, in _parse_kern_pairs > c1, c2, val = _to_str(vals[1]), _to_str(vals[2]), _to_float(vals[3]) > ValueError: could not convert string to float: B > > > At the beginning this was the error > > > python FlatCAM.py > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "FlatCAM.py", line 3, in > from FlatCAMApp import App > File > "/usr/home/bernt/vebbnerladdningar/FlatCAM-8.3/FlatCAM-8.3/FlatCAMApp.py", > line 18, in > from ObjectCollection import * > File > "/usr/home/bernt/vebbnerladdningar/FlatCAM-8.3/FlatCAM-8.3/ObjectCollection.py", > line 2, in > from FlatCAMObj import * > File > "/usr/home/bernt/vebbnerladdningar/FlatCAM-8.3/FlatCAM-8.3/FlatCAMObj.py", > line 5, in > from camlib import * > File > "/usr/home/bernt/vebbnerladdningar/FlatCAM-8.3/FlatCAM-8.3/camlib.py", > line 12, in > from numpy import arctan2, Inf, array, sqrt, pi, ceil, sin, cos, > dot, float32, \ > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/__init__.py", > line 170, in > from . import add_newdocs > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/add_newdocs.py", > line 13, in > from numpy.lib import add_newdoc > File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/lib/__init__.py", > line 18, in > from .polynomial import * > File > "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/lib/polynomial.py", line > 19, in > from numpy.linalg import eigvals, lstsq, inv > File > "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/linalg/__init__.py", > line 51, in > from .linalg import * > File > "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/numpy/linalg/linalg.py", line > 29, in > from numpy.linalg import lapack_lite, _umath_linalg > ImportError: /lib/libgcc_s.so.1: version GCC_4.6.0 required by > /usr/local/lib/gcc48/libgfortran.so.3 not found > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 17 21:02:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 581C29A30C5 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 21:02:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: from mail-yk0-f177.google.com (mail-yk0-f177.google.com [209.85.160.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FEFD1874 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 21:02:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from web@umich.edu) Received: by ykdu72 with SMTP id u72so99273840ykd.2 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:02:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:user-agent; bh=fWCxGmXt/BJxiqVb26EwfozjYaZQyA+qKMmGULKz0dc=; b=RuNkyXvlgExYKMdKUEpcm3qhCTg4UvGXZMFo6NY0Oexg+ELFtnqsvVzr0DgpctBIz6 TK+asMXPsyOL3sO7QU2poK8EA+avITHnR/cqZ/2FtycXEhQKBpwFgrkTYt4K9Oq+BFbX 23e0in1Ec0OO+z/vsPDdauwuDezCd/ICd11hoqgMqRrQSG6Ri5SpZXU0XIp0rAtYgeY3 WD/rgep5+TU5GEZ1amkXEnurPQTUv3t8S6vIo3SO+szDKyKNN9wfDF8xCDcK9IuGzmsH TrbfmRTMHq/FaY/9QQopPcOlC81ZzU1uAJ16OzvmB0OSJ9J06461AdaU7DXk9XZGRZy3 SnrA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmK76/iucHaI6lH84MCMrvcl07qGOIHsa29/hnEcs1Myd5Aneo3syZsTTDwyVj2XQIVUFOM X-Received: by 10.13.203.143 with SMTP id n137mr16026837ywd.109.1437146550734; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:22:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (adsl-68-252-134-230.dsl.sfldmi.ameritech.net. [68.252.134.230]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k128sm11200705ywd.45.2015.07.17.08.22.29 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:22:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:22:28 -0400 From: William Bulley To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Can not get Realtek RTL8188CU USB adapter to work on 10.2-BETA1 laptop Message-ID: <20150717152228.GG751@dell4> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 21:02:34 -0000 I have a new laptop with an Intel core i7-5600U CPU running 10.2-BETA1 FreeBSD. I tried following the directions here: https://vzaigrin.wordpress.com/2014/04/14/how-to-setup-usb-wifi-on-raspberry-pi-with-freebsd/ and I tried the directions in the "% man 4 urtwn" man page: To compile this driver into the kernel, place the following lines in your kernel configuration file: device ehci device uhci device ohci device usb device urtwn device wlan Alternatively, to load the driver as a module at boot time, place the following line in loader.conf(5): if_urtwn_load="YES" In both cases, place the following line in loader.conf(5) to acknowledge the firmware license (see below): legal.realtek.license_ack=1 [[I did both: rebuilt kernel AND added two lines to the /boot/loader.conf file]] and This driver requires the firmware built with the urtwnfw module to work. For the loaded firmware to be enabled for use the license at /usr/share/doc/legal/realtek must be agreed by adding the following line to loader.conf(5): legal.realtek.license_ack=1 and The urtwn driver supports Realtek RTL8188CU/RTL8188RU/RTL8188EU/RTL8192CU based USB IEEE 802.11b/g/n wireless network adapters, including: Edimax EW-7811Un [[which is the product I have]] Given that I have the urtwn(4) driver built into the kernel, and that I have those two lines in the /boot/loader.conf file, it isn't surprising that the laptop seems to detect the USB adapter at boot time: unix% dmesg | grep -i urtwn urtwn0: on usbus0 urtwn0: MAC/BB RTL8188CUS, RF 6052 1T1R urtwn0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps urtwn0: 11g rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps However, this error occurs in /var/log/messages when I try to use it: urtwn-rtl8192cfwT: You need to read the LICENSE file in /usr/share/doc/legal/realtek/. urtwn-rtl8192cfwT: If you agree with the license, set legal.realtek.license_ack=1 in /boot/loader.conf. module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (urtwn-rtl8192cfwT_fw, 0xc2aa24f0, 0) error 1 urtwn-rtl8192cfwT: could not load firmware image, error 8 urtwn0: failed loadfirmware of file urtwn-rtl8192cfwT There is in fact, the /usr/share/doc/legal/realtek license file at that location. But the urtwn(4) man page also says this: DIAGNOSTICS urtwn%d: error %d, could not read firmware %s For some reason, the driver was unable to read the microcode file from the filesystem. The file might be missing or corrupted. When I issue this command as root "# ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev urtwn0" I get this error: ifconfig: create: bad value The "could not read firmware" sub-string from the man page is close enough to the generated error sub-string when I try to use the USB adapter: "could not load firmware image" to make me think the microcode file is missing or corrupted. These files are in the /usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/urtwn directory: unix% ls -l /usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/urtwn -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2115 Jul 12 09:22 LICENSE -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 19198 Jul 12 09:22 urtwn-rtl8188eufw.fw.uu -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 21765 Jul 12 09:22 urtwn-rtl8192cfwT.fw.uu -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 21765 Jul 12 09:22 urtwn-rtl8192cfwU.fw.uu Since the adapter reports itself to be a RTL8188CUS, then the first of the three firmware/microcode files above should be loaded, yet the error message reproduced above is looking for the rtl8192cfwT firmware file. But even that file is present -- the second of the above three files. Does anyone know how to make this wi-fi adapter work in 10.2BETA1 on this laptop? It seems to work on the Raspberry Pi (see the URL above) on an earlier 10.x system, so it ought to work today on 10.2BETA1 one might surmise. Any thoughts on how to make this adapter work? Thanks. Regards, web... -- /"\ ASCII RIBBON / William Bulley \ / CAMPAIGN AGAINST / X HTML E-MAIL AND / E-MAIL: web@umich.edu / \ LISTSERV POSTINGS / 72 characters width template ----------------------------------------->| From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 17 21:10:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC0169A31A8 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 21:10:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jasonmader@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qg0-x23a.google.com (mail-qg0-x23a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::23a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A72DF19F9 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 21:10:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jasonmader@gmail.com) Received: by qgy5 with SMTP id 5so43407988qgy.0 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:10:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version:content-type; bh=jNzvY6uFT8fx9eLlNdBxJUwnxcDfCaAAGJeSoirEkoc=; b=Khbgdzk+MiDJOr4qjoU6SQY8i6obwnAzNW4V+h7Y5gOE/KRuEdCZBtuy1JwVCkXszL 62vKaF7mbTWPqUK39buhBCdgMuAd3AXZkghXvlYRe11ZfWwua7NkRsooG4XW4QwVwCV3 hZ5ud+auWwrVxydak5xhkSoqrvqZyvUSNgjsMN9wEB7m8BM0zDv/fW5yqzhjLCz96Zgi 0WnZiTG9bat9R4F46N4dpZGnyf9NQ7bKm4M1Sven5DO//Kbo7lSpd4ILegdWtI6G6c6L md8VCfQVBmBwsjoTBhvaPfjfnuAnNz/VNgK3EKF094Bnx8PMuSSmTIbhK2SLsI5kQ/3r KJ1Q== X-Received: by 10.140.86.105 with SMTP id o96mr350406qgd.11.1437167409627; Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:10:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Doc-Id: 66fced80b71015fd X-Google-Web-Client: true Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 14:10:08 -0700 (PDT) From: jasonmader@gmail.com To: ml-freebsd-questions@googlegroups.com Message-Id: <1f160fed-4d9f-49c7-a27c-d5d0a9b37e93@googlegroups.com> Subject: IPv6 bind() errno 49 in jail MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Google-IP: 129.174.182.23 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 21:19:16 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 21:10:11 -0000 In FreeBSD 10.1 I=CA=BCve encountered an error trying to use IPv6 in a jail= .=20 When nginx starts with, listen [2620:10e:6024:f004::141]:443 ssl; and jail.conf is configured, ip6.addr =3D 2620:10e:6024:f004::141; It=E2=80=99s the following error, [emerg] 2124#0: bind() to [2620:10e:6024:f004::141]:443 failed (49: Can't= =20 assign requested address) Output from truss shows, socket(PF_INET6,SOCK_STREAM,0) =3D 8 (0x8) setsockopt(0x8,0xffff,0x4,0x7fffffffe854,0x4,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) setsockopt(0x8,0x29,0x1b,0x7fffffffe848,0x4,0x0) =3D 0 (0x0) ioctl(8,FIONBIO,0xffffe7fc) =3D 0 (0x0) bind(8,{ AF_INET6 [40be:bd00:800:0:9fe8:ffff:100:0]:36096 },28) ERR#49=20 'Can't assign requested address' write(3,"2015/07/17 16:49:24 [emerg] 4760"...,121) =3D 121 (0x79) nginx: [emerg] bind() to [2620:10e:6024:f004::141]:443 failed (49: Can't=20 assign requested address) So it=E2=80=99s pretty straight forward that bind() will fail. But where is= the=20 address [40be:bd00:800:0:9fe8:ffff:100:0]:36096 coming from? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jul 18 15:06:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3476B9A5759 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:06:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevlo@ns.kevlo.org) Received: from ns.kevlo.org (220-135-115-6.HINET-IP.hinet.net [220.135.115.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ns.kevlo.org", Issuer "ns.kevlo.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDABE12A0; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:06:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevlo@ns.kevlo.org) Received: from ns.kevlo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.kevlo.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t6IF6HkJ009592 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 18 Jul 2015 23:06:17 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from kevlo@ns.kevlo.org) Received: (from kevlo@localhost) by ns.kevlo.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t6IF6HEP009589; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 23:06:17 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from kevlo) Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 23:06:16 +0800 From: Kevin Lo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can not get Realtek RTL8188CU USB adapter to work on 10.2-BETA1 laptop Message-ID: <20150718150616.GA9532@ns.kevlo.org> References: <20150717152228.GG751@dell4> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150717152228.GG751@dell4> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:06:28 -0000 Try running kldload urtwn-rtl8192cfwT or adding this to /boot/loader.conf: urtwn-rtl8192cfwT_load="YES" The latter will require a reboot to take effect. Kevin On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:22:28AM -0400, William Bulley wrote: > > I have a new laptop with an Intel core i7-5600U CPU running 10.2-BETA1 FreeBSD. > > I tried following the directions here: > > https://vzaigrin.wordpress.com/2014/04/14/how-to-setup-usb-wifi-on-raspberry-pi-with-freebsd/ > > and I tried the directions in the "% man 4 urtwn" man page: > > To compile this driver into the kernel, place the following lines in your > kernel configuration file: > > device ehci > device uhci > device ohci > device usb > device urtwn > device wlan > > Alternatively, to load the driver as a module at boot time, place the > following line in loader.conf(5): > > if_urtwn_load="YES" > > In both cases, place the following line in loader.conf(5) to acknowledge > the firmware license (see below): > > legal.realtek.license_ack=1 > > [[I did both: rebuilt kernel AND added two lines to the /boot/loader.conf file]] > > and > > This driver requires the firmware built with the urtwnfw module to work. > For the loaded firmware to be enabled for use the license at > /usr/share/doc/legal/realtek must be agreed by adding the following line > to loader.conf(5): > > legal.realtek.license_ack=1 > > and > > The urtwn driver supports Realtek RTL8188CU/RTL8188RU/RTL8188EU/RTL8192CU > based USB IEEE 802.11b/g/n wireless network adapters, including: > > Edimax EW-7811Un [[which is the product I have]] > > Given that I have the urtwn(4) driver built into the kernel, and that I have > those two lines in the /boot/loader.conf file, it isn't surprising that the > laptop seems to detect the USB adapter at boot time: > > unix% dmesg | grep -i urtwn > urtwn0: on usbus0 > urtwn0: MAC/BB RTL8188CUS, RF 6052 1T1R > urtwn0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps > urtwn0: 11g rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps 6Mbps 9Mbps 12Mbps 18Mbps 24Mbps 36Mbps 48Mbps 54Mbps > > However, this error occurs in /var/log/messages when I try to use it: > > urtwn-rtl8192cfwT: You need to read the LICENSE file in /usr/share/doc/legal/realtek/. > urtwn-rtl8192cfwT: If you agree with the license, set legal.realtek.license_ack=1 in /boot/loader.conf. > module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (urtwn-rtl8192cfwT_fw, 0xc2aa24f0, 0) error 1 > urtwn-rtl8192cfwT: could not load firmware image, error 8 > urtwn0: failed loadfirmware of file urtwn-rtl8192cfwT > > There is in fact, the /usr/share/doc/legal/realtek license file at that > location. But the urtwn(4) man page also says this: > > DIAGNOSTICS > urtwn%d: error %d, could not read firmware %s For some reason, the > driver was unable to read the microcode file from the filesystem. The > file might be missing or corrupted. > > When I issue this command as root "# ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev urtwn0" > I get this error: > > ifconfig: create: bad value > > The "could not read firmware" sub-string from the man page is close enough > to the generated error sub-string when I try to use the USB adapter: > > "could not load firmware image" > > to make me think the microcode file is missing or corrupted. > > These files are in the /usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/urtwn directory: > > unix% ls -l /usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/urtwn > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2115 Jul 12 09:22 LICENSE > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 19198 Jul 12 09:22 urtwn-rtl8188eufw.fw.uu > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 21765 Jul 12 09:22 urtwn-rtl8192cfwT.fw.uu > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 21765 Jul 12 09:22 urtwn-rtl8192cfwU.fw.uu > > Since the adapter reports itself to be a RTL8188CUS, then the first of > the three firmware/microcode files above should be loaded, yet the error > message reproduced above is looking for the rtl8192cfwT firmware file. > But even that file is present -- the second of the above three files. > > Does anyone know how to make this wi-fi adapter work in 10.2BETA1 on > this laptop? It seems to work on the Raspberry Pi (see the URL above) > on an earlier 10.x system, so it ought to work today on 10.2BETA1 one > might surmise. Any thoughts on how to make this adapter work? Thanks. > > Regards, > > web... > > -- > > /"\ ASCII RIBBON / William Bulley > \ / CAMPAIGN AGAINST / > X HTML E-MAIL AND / E-MAIL: web@umich.edu > / \ LISTSERV POSTINGS / > > 72 characters width template ----------------------------------------->| > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jul 18 15:14:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266B19A58DE for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:14:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mfv@bway.net) Received: from smtp2.bway.net (smtp2.bway.net [216.220.96.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 015511880 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:14:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mfv@bway.net) Received: from gecko4 (host-216-220-115-104.dsl.bway.net [216.220.115.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m1316v@bway.net) by smtp2.bway.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9D4095875; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 11:14:38 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bway.net; s=mail; t=1437232479; bh=+nCZK4lZIaOVSMiGkjhdCW9HQEw3PxECjIhltmdJChc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Reply-To; b=KJDEcuBTaDBJrBykOwhzzfXXVN3+OyMFBe4ZSIT0Hh+IFp+cgMKUEGbx0wLqn2rZi iIEEFT/eJnrh9LT5qyduvd3m8j8WkbM2ebJZsbJJrXVt+xf4Xyt/pJ0t9b7Ft2Aqta C4vUGhUpcbeZyjIcr8H5Wy05A7gn7a16ZjKw8rSM= Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 11:14:38 -0400 From: mfv To: Lowell Gilbert Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sync Ports to Packages Message-ID: <20150718111438.10f593f7@gecko4> In-Reply-To: <44mvyulhdx.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> References: <20150717145356.612a3a1e@gecko4> <44mvyulhdx.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> Reply-To: mfv@bway.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:14:49 -0000 > On Fri, 2015-07-17 at 15:21 Lowell Gilbert > wrote: > >mfv writes: > >> Am trying to write a script to keep my packages and ports in sync but >> have not been able to find a local file in the package system that >> contains the revision number of my last upgrade. Once that number is >> obtained it is possible to sync the port tree. >> >> The following script extracts the build number from the appropriate >> server but needs Internet access: >> >> https://gist.github.com/reedacartwright/8622973baf89b263a6d7 >> >> Is it possible to extract the same revision number from a local file? > >svnversion(1) >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hello Lowell, Thanks for your reply. It appears I did not explain my issue clearly. The idea is to have both ports and packages synced to the same build/revision number. To do this I first upgrade the binaries by invoking "pkg upgrade". Then, after using a web browser to check out the appropriate beefy server, I identify the build number of that upgrade. Finally, I update the local ports tree by running "svnup ports -n ". When finished, the ports and packages are synced. It is possible to identify the revision number of the ports tree by using "svnup ports -n". But I can not find a command among the pkg tools that provides the equivalent number by accessing local files. Cheers ... Marek From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jul 18 18:22:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CDAF9A5A27 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 18:22:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 987C21280 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 18:22:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id t6II3n7M037172; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 04:03:50 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 04:03:49 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: William Bulley cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can not get Realtek RTL8188CU USB adapter to work on 10.2-BETA1 laptop In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20150719033342.L21302@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 18:22:02 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 580, Issue 6, Message: 6 On Fri, 17 Jul 2015 11:22:28 -0400 William Bulley wrote: > I have a new laptop with an Intel core i7-5600U CPU running 10.2-BETA1 FreeBSD. > > I tried following the directions here: > > https://vzaigrin.wordpress.com/2014/04/14/how-to-setup-usb-wifi-on-raspberry-pi-with-freebsd/ > > and I tried the directions in the "% man 4 urtwn" man page: > > To compile this driver into the kernel, place the following lines in your > kernel configuration file: > > device ehci > device uhci > device ohci > device usb > device urtwn > device wlan > > Alternatively, to load the driver as a module at boot time, place the > following line in loader.conf(5): > > if_urtwn_load="YES" > > In both cases, place the following line in loader.conf(5) to acknowledge > the firmware license (see below): > > legal.realtek.license_ack=1 > > [[I did both: rebuilt kernel AND added two lines to the /boot/loader.conf file]] What Kevin said, I expect, but I'm a sucker for a splendid bug report :) It does say 'Alternatively', and I'd expect to see something in dmesg about failure to load the module, being already in kernel. Which may not matter here, but I'd expect kldstat -v to show urtwn in kernel. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jul 18 18:22:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43AD59A5A2C for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 18:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hartzell@alerce.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F1A1287 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 18:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hartzell@alerce.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 28E789A5A2B; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 18:22:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287B49A5A2A for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 18:22:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hartzell@alerce.com) Received: from griffon.alerce.com (griffon.alerce.com [206.125.171.162]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "griffon.alerce.com", Issuer "griffon.alerce.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 139DF1286 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 18:22:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hartzell@alerce.com) Received: from griffon.alerce.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by griffon.alerce.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34DF42842D for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 11:15:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postfix.alerce.com (75-149-38-78-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [75.149.38.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by griffon.alerce.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1AF82842C for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 11:15:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by postfix.alerce.com (Postfix, from userid 503) id 03D225A09F2E; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 11:15:36 -0700 (PDT) From: George Hartzell MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <21930.38856.925971.642440@alacrity.local> Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 11:15:36 -0700 To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: loader can't load vmm.ko after upgrade of -STABLE X-Mailer: VM 8.2.0b under 24.5.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0) Reply-To: hartzell@alerce.com X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 18:22:04 -0000 I've filed this as [bug 201679](https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201679). --- I upgraded my 10.2-STABLE system via svn last night, did the build and install world and kernel dance. Generally everything is as it should be. But, I can no longer load `vmm.ko` via the loader, which used to work. I have these lines in `/boot/loader.conf`: ``` vmm_load="YES" pptdevs="0/23/0" ``` and/but at the machine boots, I get this on the console. ``` >> FreeBSD EFI boot block Loader path: /boot/loader.efi Consoles: EFI console Image base: 0x78a69000 EFI version: 2.40 EFI Firmware: EDK II (rev 1.00) FreeBSD/amd64 EFI loader, Revision 1.1 (root@fishy.alerce.com, Sat Jul 18 00:42:15 PDT 2015) Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf /boot/kernel/kernel text=0x1396e50 data=0x132738+0x4d7f40 syms=[0x8+0x159d50+0x8 +0x17465c] /boot/entropy size=0x1000 /boot/kernel/vmm.ko | elf64_obj_loadimage: read failed Hit [Enter] to boot immediately, or any other key for command prompt. Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel]... Start @ 0xffffffff802f9000 ... ``` I am unable to load them by hand via the loader either: ``` OK OK load vmm /boot/kernel/vmm.ko - elf64_obj_loadimage: read failed can't load file '/boot/kernel/vmm.ko': input/output error OK ``` Loading `/boot/kernel.old/vmm.ko` (from the old build) also fails. I can load the module using `kldload` once the system is up and running. I also noticed that the `if_urtwn.ko` module loaded via the loader, so I think that loading kernel modules is not generally broken. ``` root@fishy:~ # kldload vmm root@fishy:~ # kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 9 0xffffffff80200000 1e6fa38 kernel 2 1 0xffffffff82211000 11f42 if_urtwn.ko 3 1 0xffffffff82223000 338ac2 vmm.ko root@fishy:~ # ``` I'd like to get this working. Suggestions? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jul 18 20:01:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED869A5B4A for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 20:01:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ana5.bestschools@gmail.com) Received: from mailer85.gate181.sl.smtp.com (mailer85.gate181.sl.smtp.com [192.40.181.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BBE12B2 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 20:01:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ana5.bestschools@gmail.com) X-MSFBL: ZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmdAMTkyXzQwXzE4MV84NUBzbXRw Y29tXzIxQA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=smtp.com; s=smtpcomcustomers; c=relaxed/simple; q=dns/txt; i=@smtp.com; t=1437248484; h=From:Subject:To:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; bh=QHSFiVFZKqSKsj+NskIw+CGzyAgfYjjnvEcTHDGIEtI=; b=kalvBrJBIYl8YSHu+H103JcuqidV1y9IlwvTevrnmSh4IZ4vdX62mYR5WIZA6GqS 0Rg/YTczGxu5wjF/TcSeUcE7GKwL5mPtUHTNbsj5m1iF/DkATupHoEuPOdMeERgQ mEn5l2zKbsIC9+hVuFTqi9ks4WmrswcF/s43tgqh1W8=; Received: from [23.21.230.67] ([23.21.230.67:38984] helo=offandawaymail.com) by sl-mta07 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.3.2.44647 r(44647)) with ESMTPA id F5/F2-16199-4EBAAA55; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:41:24 +0000 Received: from offandawaymail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by offandawaymail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0AC23666 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple; d=offandawaymail.com; h= content-type:mime-version:to:from:subject:date; s=postfix; bh=Og C74uijnWoVK9pDCNcgNlnSBiY=; b=S9Jfvqv6El8v+H8ig9c0wdgoIA/J3ZCKMV qLdP8Myrjotrb3TyxQ+Zk0kiTKhP95BvsQF3MJgVuXKVjHf0n04ndOkF5HwjH196 oAhb/cAL3IZzZ39YciZR1yLepYHTJ8fwiDBGhC9yCbiP2yqOIiB0ToZpS7TjkSfb 9FbuPZHUw= MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ana Berjuega Subject: Touching base on Wyoming Students and Parents Education Resources Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 19:41:47 +0000 X-SMTPCOM-Tracking-Number: 30e48539-bbe9-4033-b0e6-a2227222e452 Feedback-ID: 6023393:SMTPCOM X-SMTPCOM-Sender-ID: 6023393 X-SMTPCOM-Spam-Policy: SMTP.com is a paid relay service. We do not tolerate UCE of any kind. Please report it ASAP to abuse@smtp.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 20:01:31 -0000 SGkgdGhlcmUsCgpJIGhhZCBzZW50IHlvdSBhbiBlbWFpbCBvciB0d28gc29tZXRpbWUgYWdvIGFi b3V0IHNvbWUgb2YgdGhlIHJlc291cmNlcyBvbiB0aGlzIHBhZ2UgOiBodHRwOi8vd3d3LnBsLmZy ZWVic2Qub3JnL2dhbGxlcnkvbnBnYWxsZXJ5Lmh0bWwuIAoKSSBhbSB3b25kZXJpbmcgaWYgeW91 IGFyZSB0aGUgcGVyc29uIHJlc3BvbnNpYmxlIGZvciBtYWludGFpbmluZyBpdCBiZWNhdXNlIEkg aGF2ZSBzb21lIHF1ZXN0aW9ucy4gSWYgeW91IGFyZSBub3QgdGhlIHJpZ2h0IGNvbnRhY3QsIHBs ZWFzZSBmb3J3YXJkIG1lIG9yIGxldCBtZSBrbm93IHdobyBJIHNob3VsZCBjb250YWN0LiBIb3Bl IHRvIGhlYXIgYmFjayBmcm9tIHlvdSBzb29uLgoKVGhhbmsgeW91LAoKQW5hIEJlcmp1ZWdhCmFu YTUuYmVzdHNjaG9vbHNAZ21haWwuY29tCkJlc3RTY2hvb2xzLmNvbQoyNDQgNXRoIEF2ZSwgU3Vp dGUgSzI2NwpOZXcgWW9yaywgTlkgMTAwMDEKCkVNQUlMIERJU0NMQUlNRVI6IFRoaXMgZW1haWwg YW5kIGFueSBmaWxlcyB0cmFuc21pdHRlZCB3aXRoIGl0IGFyZSBjb25maWRlbnRpYWwgYW5kIGlu dGVuZGVkIHNvbGVseSBmb3IgdGhlIHVzZSBvZiB0aGUgaW5kaXZpZHVhbCBvciBlbnRpdHkgdG8g d2hvbSB0aGV5IGFyZSBhZGRyZXNzZWQuIElmIHlvdSBoYXZlIHJlY2VpdmVkIHRoaXMgZW1haWwg aW4gZXJyb3IgcGxlYXNlIG5vdGlmeSB0aGUgc3lzdGVtIG1hbmFnZXIuIFBsZWFzZSBub3RlIHRo YXQgYW55IHZpZXdzIG9yIG9waW5pb25zIHByZXNlbnRlZCBpbiB0aGlzIGVtYWlsIGFyZSBzb2xl bHkgdGhvc2Ugb2YgdGhlIGF1dGhvciBhbmQgZG8gbm90IG5lY2Vzc2FyaWx5IHJlcHJlc2VudCB0 aG9zZSBvZiB0aGUgY29tcGFueS4gVGhpcyBlbWFpbCBjb21wbGllcyB3aXRoIHRoZSBVLlMuIENB Ti1TUEFNIGFjdCBvZiAyMDAzLiBJZiB5b3UgZG8gbm90IHdpc2ggdG8gcmVjZWl2ZSBmdXR1cmUg ZS1tYWlscywgcGxlYXNlIHJlcGx5IHRvIHRoaXMgZW1haWwgd2l0aCAiVU5TVUJTQ1JJQkUiIGlu IHRoZSBzdWJqZWN0IGxpbmUuIFlvdXIgZW1haWwgYWRkcmVzcyB3aWxsIGJlIHJlbW92ZWQgZnJv bSBvdXIgZGF0YWJhc2Ugd2l0aGluIDctMTAgYnVzaW5lc3MgZGF5cy4= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jul 18 22:07:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 152BE9A5F57 for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 22:07:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com) Received: from know-smtprelay-omc-7.server.virginmedia.net (know-smtprelay-omc-7.server.virginmedia.net [80.0.253.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BAFD156B for ; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 22:07:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zarniwhoop@ntlworld.com) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([81.106.150.188]) by know-smtprelay-7-imp with bizsmtp id ty7N1q00k4481jl01y7NSC; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 23:07:22 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [81.106.150.188] X-Spam: 0 X-Authority: v=2.1 cv=JuUM15MC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=DGj713NdaxKrsjjgQne7PA==:117 a=DGj713NdaxKrsjjgQne7PA==:17 a=NLZqzBF-AAAA:8 a=yEdEr6MRgwAA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=zOBTXjUuO1YA:10 a=2lX-TfwMBlMA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=EhyEOX6OAAAA:8 a=xb1Ys6W25OK56romUPgA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=2-NaOPgZQIYA:10 Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9EE2A860B0; Sat, 18 Jul 2015 23:07:06 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 23:07:06 +0100 From: Ken Moffat To: Ana Berjuega Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Touching base on Wyoming Students and Parents Education Resources Message-ID: <20150718220706.GA12108@milliways> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 22:07:32 -0000 On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 07:41:47PM +0000, Ana Berjuega wrote: > Hi there, > > I had sent you an email or two sometime ago about some of the resources on this page : http://www.pl.freebsd.org/gallery/npgallery.html. > > I am wondering if you are the person responsible for maintaining it because I have some questions. If you are not the right contact, please forward me or let me know who I should contact. Hope to hear back from you soon. > > Thank you, > > Ana Berjuega > ana5.bestschools@gmail.com > BestSchools.com > 244 5th Ave, Suite K267 > New York, NY 10001 > Ana, this is a mailing list, not an individual person. If you did not get a reply to your earlier mails (I remember seeing them), then probably nobody who is subscribed here knows the answer. Taking a quick look at that site (not the specific page) - I assume it *was* a polish mirror - it appears to be *years* out of date ("latest news" is from 2007). I surmise that site is defunct. Your (or your employer's) disclaimer, is, of course, nonsense when sent to a public mailing list. But I assume you cannot prevent it getting attached. ĸen -- This one goes up to eleven!