From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun May 22 04:05:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8674B412A5 for ; Sun, 22 May 2016 04:05:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9811132B for ; Sun, 22 May 2016 04:05:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4M45vgQ071495 for ; Sun, 22 May 2016 04:05:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209682] [panic] [netinet] arptimer race Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 04:05:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 04:05:57 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209682 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |patch --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun May 22 12:58:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8782FB456A8 for ; Sun, 22 May 2016 12:58:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tangernekeysupport@services.ca) Received: from services.ca (mail.newyorkrehab.com [162.223.61.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 128C41DAB for ; Sun, 22 May 2016 12:58:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tangernekeysupport@services.ca) Reply-To: "Support/Tangerine" From: "Support/Tangerine" To: "" Subject: Reminder - Transaction review required! Sender: "Support/Tangerine" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="= Multipart Boundary 0522160858" Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 12:58:34 GMT Message-ID: <32314169466411801@NEWMAN> X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 12:58:34 -0000 This is a multipart MIME message. --= Multipart Boundary 0522160858 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Your transaction(s) for the following account(s) are now available for reviewing. Please find and download the attached PDF transaction(s) report and follow the instruction. For your security, you must review these transactions by May 25th, 2016. Thank you for cooperation. This email was sent to you by Orange Key Security Corporation, on behalf of Tangerine. --= Multipart Boundary 0522160858 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="Tangerine_Transaction_Review_May-21-2016.pdf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Tangerine_Transaction_Review_May-21-2016.pdf" JVBERi0xLjYNJeLjz9MNCjUxIDAgb2JqDTw8L0xpbmVhcml6ZWQgMS9MIDE1MDM5L08gNTMv RSA5MTk5L04gMS9UIDE0NzI4L0ggWyA0NjIgMTY5XT4+DWVuZG9iag0gICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgDQo1OSAwIG9iag08PC9EZWNvZGVQYXJtczw8L0NvbHVtbnMgNC9QcmVkaWN0b3Ig MTI+Pi9GaWx0ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUvSURbPEVFQjAxM0ExRDk2RjEwN0Q1RjY4ODE3NTgx ODgzNzBDPjw5N0VBNTUxMTJCQTFFQTRGODk4N0VEOEYyMEZFRjcyNT5dL0luZGV4WzUxIDIw XS9JbmZvIDUwIDAgUi9MZW5ndGggNTkvUHJldiAxNDcyOS9Sb290IDUyIDAgUi9TaXplIDcx L1R5cGUvWFJlZi9XWzEgMiAxXT4+c3RyZWFtDQpo3mJiZBBgYGJgSgcSjMIgwhJIMP8DEqwG QIK7BSQmBiRevGRgYmQ4BGQxMDASTfxnnPEdIMAAbKEH+Q0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag1z dGFydHhyZWYNCjANCiUlRU9GDQogICAgICAgIA0KNzAgMCBvYmoNPDwvQyA4OC9GaWx0ZXIv RmxhdGVEZWNvZGUvSSAxMTAvTCA3Mi9MZW5ndGggNzkvUyAzOD4+c3RyZWFtDQpo3mJgYGBj YGB6yAAECqkMqIARiFkYOBqQxdigmIFRjIGHyfCF48o8Bi4/kAATA4P6GqiuTgit/B5CM++F 62dlYLBIg4gyKgMEGAAD8AjxDQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTUyIDAgb2JqDTw8L0xhbmco /v8ARQBOAC0AVQBTKS9MYXN0TW9kaWZpZWQoRDoyMDE2MDUxMjA4NDQ1MikvTWFya0luZm88 PC9MZXR0ZXJzcGFjZUZsYWdzIDAvTWFya2VkIHRydWU+Pi9NZXRhZGF0YSAzIDAgUi9QYWdl TGFiZWxzIDQ3IDAgUi9QYWdlTGF5b3V0L09uZUNvbHVtbi9QYWdlcyA0OSAwIFIvUGllY2VJ bmZvPDwvTWFya2VkUERGPDwvTGFzdE1vZGlmaWVkKEQ6MjAxNjA1MTIwODQ0NTIpPj4+Pi9T dHJ1Y3RUcmVlUm9vdCA3IDAgUi9UeXBlL0NhdGFsb2c+Pg1lbmRvYmoNNTMgMCBvYmoNPDwv QW5ub3RzIDYwIDAgUi9Db250ZW50cyA1NSAwIFIvQ3JvcEJveFswIDAgNjEyIDc5Ml0vTWVk aWFCb3hbMCAwIDYxMiA3OTJdL1BhcmVudCA0OSAwIFIvUmVzb3VyY2VzPDwvQ29sb3JTcGFj ZTw8L0NTMCA2MyAwIFIvQ1MxIDYyIDAgUj4+L0V4dEdTdGF0ZTw8L0dTMCA2NCAwIFI+Pi9G b250PDwvVFQwIDY2IDAgUi9UVDEgNjggMCBSPj4vUHJvY1NldFsvUERGL1RleHQvSW1hZ2VD L0ltYWdlSV0vWE9iamVjdDw8L0ltMCA1OCAwIFI+Pj4+L1JvdGF0ZSAwL1N0cnVjdFBhcmVu dHMgMC9UYWJzL1MvVHlwZS9QYWdlPj4NZW5kb2JqDTU0IDAgb2JqDTw8L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0 ZURlY29kZS9GaXJzdCA2OC9MZW5ndGggNjcwL04gMTAvVHlwZS9PYmpTdG0+PnN0cmVhbQ0K aN6kU9tu2zAM/RU+tg+xLrZkeygMJFmzBmi7Ls7WAUEetERLjMVyYKtbuq8fJTtBL+luhUCI 5KHJI+lYUqAgGSQgOXAmQYbAwwhkBBwzUkDIcZMgohRkDKlALAHGkhhkCkzEHGb4PYXJ/OyM 9F0SfTLIMcpxTe+3mgyqeqlrcgssy7pg5gazORnOWIBOa3NyQcbkw51a3lSFsc2MpzRII4g4 DZJYQiiSQIbyeRzKQEZIuStvwzmZ6IV9sce+KL/7Yh3Jy8J8a+n2jalsls3IeDgcqEYvQUh/ QsyYpd5hAu8GE8CFABHvT//+Br6qTaPRuQJG8n4X5ldAA8rb5uc7+y63ympSbVs8y9zNNQtt LCQpI0O1vdDFam2BUUrJW91CPXweMtqoVQNhREaVsYNBtZv1BL5HL6QxcKx2n8Rzj45UWWzu T6ZFqRu41j9gUpXKnHrsWpWaeAQBn7/Jr6Yeym2t7WJNrqu6VBufum3ZREhmbNWmWPTNaqOB ktzq8hMk3clcqSNbF1tb1eTzg0P4I7qrdDVHBp+bRbUszIrcFqZvmuIQj4q6scO1qlGHTwY4 cTqpXaqugnF+eMxpfac9qQMzbL20a5SUcMo7thwShiH8piJOHsWx/zdib86nIFApznPmerV1 SZJ21f53w2pXJxnzcYrKfT4rwqygj3fX0fnOWi57L0bbI87ak4Q4lz9AOo5tt/lrdSce647L /9Ndb1Btln8UX/yC+FgoX6e+/fj/k2D8VILsHyXo+B1VIn3ynoK+pMq/XdKzPb78HNSkV1u3 H9SG8V75bk9cHnN7rNMmai18gDitdexbpeXk42Ts7GRt7fYNIYu7xlalrhtdfy8Wugl29z9J qQoTqO0WH1rZojLkNMt+CTAAgr3GFQ0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag01NSAwIG9iag08PC9G aWx0ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUvTGVuZ3RoIDEyNTc+PnN0cmVhbQ0KSImEVk1v4zYQvftXzKWA BES0SH1ZxWKBJN7upkCwbW2gh0UPjExL6tqSS1FJ3V/fIfVtR96TDFPizLz35s0sn4pDXohN xk8CPnxYPj8+rcGFjx8f1o+w+Gex/LxxIa0WLHJJtMITF6gbQOxCSANIjovl09GFdbn4ffHp Gb9Y/tbfQrtbzMHDdnzGurPu/uV2izfDdr9wieu6DLYJON3PN6CsCc1MZNcjcQjb48JaCy5h y4tUSKwCHg+5KNQdgL39uwn7aRLWu5GS352ZqH6fAKVXCQRRSLwmgXuQIsGYoCQvKp6ovCzg jVewP/A0FTt4OUNZS6gUV8LRab1f3wovDDDAdrewyr1+b4johQZ7DTiGdDziRQHggzH9+jfL UZlwuFRwX/DDWeVJBRuR1DJXZ1gLJUxSdkCYBfZf21+bDIIhg0Bn4NCY0BgfRIfR127OlRJH GzOzCDRfvgNpcAPScAIpHSK+A6nnd5xuByQHGBHRjL/mRQp1kRw066U0LLv6VtfcF5LYbyHM 8jQTEmRefQcuBZL0mou3ho5BLn/o454Tb8gvbhAxF/aIWM+84CkicoscJDKIGDgRWbXsCBvv jC0tEcE1nNS6A5XJ2uhiSOaraUR4sCMEnLcffdcV92R+rjlio4Qgs3REN+hY9XQM4g6vmPBj jwQNE0974AUCzmuVlTL/D/FrZd6DNpBKPXOVS3zakmB6Ia8gKYtdnSj9dSbLOs3gjKX3Vwyt pn+Os5li6xL8y6HmYZAdgfdLKd8QuNDicgcPvMHtQuxGJA5jJFwFI1YrIV/zRNwZIaAN0ZEN hUNqBihsPa/t0m8WFgE66MrKDwd40SLLjy+1rLBQ6ro/2ZhqaMEehcqLM55W9UHZHv6X2xg+ tDDFQ4l9GVpVJSpQJeJTVraPNwrgSVLWhaqIeWGW7/gG37T38cFdx1RNWA8YoW3/lcbT8tcf CT0KPcQR1RKNlI65ahxQ575lwLAdXUDzR/sG9kJd7LA/VYbySDtV32ldQPNmbesXK/XzbOX0 1nyhbGI9Q2vT4Lp05neC3+QpKrZAvnatZYC8MJlZPHziB1pXAVkZPKyruVBp9+kn03Jzwubq E+5H0/JxQwEt3IQBqJLiyp4MfSsSdlq0cO4lRvJfhBTj2cdiV3uYr1XvQ4gdgjOchFjcYn8J 2TAAIX2/4gBjsjFeZG7Q0ltjgYYzo/Z61Htx2I2F+71CxaSlLrO3z5akkywTUVVGP72vRAPp UTsfPLdD7G3Usxc6v6wSe5UhsYx45su2w7u2nrjjdL63hoNO440NZ6SIefxu+ThdXWqFmuSN VuYdLL5GNwiI7zdNn4lKNGL9IRwRWjw6cYAG0DQ+N83aanxiiblEhgRamm/Jpver/OUgTINN /bMo1dRD7ZBEFuR7896uNC8Mjn65QDm4PkTeeH1JyuPpcDYRfO24zEK3KVA6AgrxrwLmQ4YS quZnKb1lrswdt8vF+nrZq1PU0Spaq/0TIc9wWpkataL0YMR5WZ6E5DcFwqbuNz5ht7L2Jq13 uQRO8mQRMwwf9eYjE/iiaRrsa3Tp3OrczHO3Y2W9sMzG9f4eda0z3a+hmTCr0YBZ6fHx1QCk V8Ceu3FCwSShyynuhMSNmlXXb8UybBIb1B3O3359PuFiLdrpVahZrbBwlo9pK/8vwACWEVE4 DQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTU2IDAgb2JqDTw8L0FsdGVybmF0ZS9EZXZpY2VSR0IvRmls dGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL0xlbmd0aCAyNTk3L04gMz4+c3RyZWFtDQpo3pyWd1RU1xaHz713 eqHNMNIZepMuMID0LiAdBFEYZgYYygDDDE1siKhARBERAUWQoIABo6FIrIhiISioYA9IEFBi MIqoqGRG1kp8eXnv5eX3x73f2mfvc/fZe5+1LgAkTx8uLwWWAiCZJ+AHejjTV4VH0LH9AAZ4 gAGmADBZ6am+Qe7BQCQvNxd6usgJ/IveDAFI/L5l6OlPp4P/T9KsVL4AAMhfxOZsTjpLxPki TsoUpIrtMyKmxiSKGUaJmS9KUMRyYo5b5KWffRbZUczsZB5bxOKcU9nJbDH3iHh7hpAjYsRH xAUZXE6miG+LWDNJmMwV8VtxbDKHmQ4AiiS2CziseBGbiJjEDw50EfFyAHCkuC845gsWcLIE 4kO5pKRm87lx8QK6LkuPbmptzaB7cjKTOAKBoT+Tlcjks+kuKcmpTF42AItn/iwZcW3poiJb mlpbWhqaGZl+Uaj/uvg3Je7tIr0K+NwziNb3h+2v/FLqAGDMimqz6w9bzH4AOrYCIHf/D5vm IQAkRX1rv/HFeWjieYkXCFJtjI0zMzONuByWkbigv+t/OvwNffE9I/F2v5eH7sqJZQqTBHRx 3VgpSSlCPj09lcni0A3/PMT/OPCv81gayInl8Dk8UUSoaMq4vDhRu3lsroCbwqNzef+pif8w 7E9anGuRKPWfADXKCEjdoALk5z6AohABEnlQ3PXf++aDDwXimxemOrE4958F/fuucIn4kc6N +xznEhhMZwn5GYtr4msJ0IAAJAEVyAMVoAF0gSEwA1bAFjgCN7AC+IFgEA7WAhaIB8mADzJB LtgMCkAR2AX2gkpQA+pBI2gBJ0AHOA0ugMvgOrgJ7oAHYASMg+dgBrwB8xAEYSEyRIHkIVVI CzKAzCAGZA+5QT5QIBQORUNxEA8SQrnQFqgIKoUqoVqoEfoWOgVdgK5CA9A9aBSagn6F3sMI TIKpsDKsDRvDDNgJ9oaD4TVwHJwG58D58E64Aq6Dj8Ht8AX4OnwHHoGfw7MIQIgIDVFDDBEG 4oL4IRFILMJHNiCFSDlSh7QgXUgvcgsZQaaRdygMioKiowxRtihPVAiKhUpDbUAVoypRR1Ht qB7ULdQoagb1CU1GK6EN0DZoL/QqdBw6E12ALkc3oNvQl9B30OPoNxgMhobRwVhhPDHhmATM Okwx5gCmFXMeM4AZw8xisVh5rAHWDuuHZWIF2ALsfuwx7DnsIHYc+xZHxKnizHDuuAgcD5eH K8c14c7iBnETuHm8FF4Lb4P3w7Px2fgSfD2+C38DP46fJ0gTdAh2hGBCAmEzoYLQQrhEeEh4 RSQS1YnWxAAil7iJWEE8TrxCHCW+I8mQ9EkupEiSkLSTdIR0nnSP9IpMJmuTHckRZAF5J7mR fJH8mPxWgiJhJOElwZbYKFEl0S4xKPFCEi+pJekkuVYyR7Jc8qTkDclpKbyUtpSLFFNqg1SV 1CmpYalZaYq0qbSfdLJ0sXST9FXpSRmsjLaMmwxbJl/msMxFmTEKQtGguFBYlC2UesolyjgV Q9WhelETqEXUb6j91BlZGdllsqGyWbJVsmdkR2gITZvmRUuildBO0IZo75coL3FawlmyY0nL ksElc3KKco5yHLlCuVa5O3Lv5enybvKJ8rvlO+QfKaAU9BUCFDIVDipcUphWpCraKrIUCxVP KN5XgpX0lQKV1ikdVupTmlVWUfZQTlXer3xReVqFpuKokqBSpnJWZUqVomqvylUtUz2n+owu S3eiJ9Er6D30GTUlNU81oVqtWr/avLqOeoh6nnqr+iMNggZDI1ajTKNbY0ZTVdNXM1ezWfO+ Fl6LoRWvtU+rV2tOW0c7THubdof2pI6cjpdOjk6zzkNdsq6Dbppune5tPYweQy9R74DeTX1Y 30I/Xr9K/4YBbGBpwDU4YDCwFL3Ueilvad3SYUOSoZNhhmGz4agRzcjHKM+ow+iFsaZxhPFu 417jTyYWJkkm9SYPTGVMV5jmmXaZ/mqmb8YyqzK7bU42dzffaN5p/nKZwTLOsoPL7lpQLHwt tll0W3y0tLLkW7ZYTllpWkVbVVsNM6gMf0Yx44o12trZeqP1aet3NpY2ApsTNr/YGtom2jbZ Ti7XWc5ZXr98zE7djmlXazdiT7ePtj9kP+Kg5sB0qHN44qjhyHZscJxw0nNKcDrm9MLZxJnv 3OY852Ljst7lvCvi6uFa6NrvJuMW4lbp9thd3T3Ovdl9xsPCY53HeU+0p7fnbs9hL2Uvllej 18wKqxXrV/R4k7yDvCu9n/jo+/B9unxh3xW+e3wfrtRayVvZ4Qf8vPz2+D3y1/FP8/8+ABPg H1AV8DTQNDA3sDeIEhQV1BT0Jtg5uCT4QYhuiDCkO1QyNDK0MXQuzDWsNGxklfGq9auuhyuE c8M7I7ARoRENEbOr3VbvXT0eaRFZEDm0RmdN1pqraxXWJq09EyUZxYw6GY2ODotuiv7A9GPW MWdjvGKqY2ZYLqx9rOdsR3YZe4pjxynlTMTaxZbGTsbZxe2Jm4p3iC+Pn+a6cCu5LxM8E2oS 5hL9Eo8kLiSFJbUm45Kjk0/xZHiJvJ4UlZSslIFUg9SC1JE0m7S9aTN8b35DOpS+Jr1TQBX9 TPUJdYVbhaMZ9hlVGW8zQzNPZkln8bL6svWzd2RP5LjnfL0OtY61rjtXLXdz7uh6p/W1G6AN MRu6N2pszN84vslj09HNhM2Jm3/IM8krzXu9JWxLV75y/qb8sa0eW5sLJAr4BcPbbLfVbEdt 527v32G+Y/+OT4XswmtFJkXlRR+KWcXXvjL9quKrhZ2xO/tLLEsO7sLs4u0a2u2w+2ipdGlO 6dge3z3tZfSywrLXe6P2Xi1fVl6zj7BPuG+kwqeic7/m/l37P1TGV96pcq5qrVaq3lE9d4B9 YPCg48GWGuWaopr3h7iH7tZ61LbXadeVH8Yczjj8tD60vvdrxteNDQoNRQ0fj/COjBwNPNrT aNXY2KTUVNIMNwubp45FHrv5jes3nS2GLbWttNai4+C48Pizb6O/HTrhfaL7JONky3da31W3 UdoK26H27PaZjviOkc7wzoFTK051d9l2tX1v9P2R02qnq87Inik5Szibf3bhXM652fOp56cv xF0Y647qfnBx1cXbPQE9/Ze8L1257H75Yq9T77krdldOX7W5euoa41rHdcvr7X0WfW0/WPzQ 1m/Z337D6kbnTeubXQPLB84OOgxeuOV66/Jtr9vX76y8MzAUMnR3OHJ45C777uS9pHsv72fc n3+w6SH6YeEjqUflj5Ue1/2o92PriOXImVHX0b4nQU8ejLHGnv+U/tOH8fyn5KflE6oTjZNm k6en3KduPlv9bPx56vP56YKfpX+ufqH74rtfHH/pm1k1M/6S/3Lh1+JX8q+OvF72unvWf/bx m+Q383OFb+XfHn3HeNf7Puz9xHzmB+yHio96H7s+eX96uJC8sPCbAAMA94Tz+w0KZW5kc3Ry ZWFtDWVuZG9iag01NyAwIG9iag08PC9GaWx0ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUvTGVuZ3RoIDIwOD4+ c3RyZWFtDQpo3vr/////b+/+fXz1+8qOHwtiv3Vqf+93+bm9+/tEz69VDF9LGP48vPRr79Rv jYrfmpS/1Qp+6zL59+7x7/Obv7Vo/H1x81u9+I+lhd8a5X8sSP7WIP1zbfnPDXXfavl/HZz1 rdvmz50zP5bn/ViY+fv06t+Xdv+5ffTn1pbf57f92t3/a/+87zP8fyyM+/79+4YNm5YtX3n3 7r1Zs+e+efN2x45d7e1deflFtXWNScnph48cLS2rPH36zNWr1yKi4hhGwSigHgAIMAA7wnoV DQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTU4IDAgb2JqDTw8L0JpdHNQZXJDb21wb25lbnQgOC9Db2xv clNwYWNlIDYzIDAgUi9GaWx0ZXIvRmxhdGVEZWNvZGUvSGVpZ2h0IDE0MC9MZW5ndGggMjc2 MC9TdWJ0eXBlL0ltYWdlL1R5cGUvWE9iamVjdC9XaWR0aCAzNjE+PnN0cmVhbQ0KaN7sm2tj ojgUhoPXUi2IyiAaraW4HRdFFC+4//+Hba4QUFvHzq60c94vY4EE8uTk5OQkgxAIBAKBQCAQ CAQCgUAgEAgEAoFAIBAIBAKBQCAQCAQCgUAgEAgEAoFAIBAIBAKBQCAQCAQCgUAgEOhKadq3 aUrlA93z26q1eqNZ+f0Nu0tjHvR39di6H+e2/mQYZse6qbD1TqO692hN7an3nvT7ge7r7Avs H7eVfnQutcmoA+icQdscS+c2P90d2O75Njk1AK1qKDgZ1o0V9EfGWdS4D6BVjU3OeXJ75GEN sXHKuX2X5tScsoK2OCTc/Ewl1XqxfUbjPs2puYaU8jGp7ggadbHtOHjwye6aFEjj5/u0RsvC S23Kv8nslySO7o9qL95nK6lMcs7RHqH7S0w/+Pssx1h3qW761hgGQF8hDytzzmsZvuibgkYP qU2701J80DnQfd/zXluX0fdfPc97Pr2v9VvPrUsRsOWPZ7OZ93xpBrBaF4uiVtfzumem6P5f zdns7dwd5JnpJH/XOecy6P6o42LTxGZ90ELe5IGoQaKtV/7rjURPDw65b+LeNA/Gn3YcG9vG ZGahSoM9Pcxu1nrYdl2XFBv48mKV1Tn5Sbpo/FC3MTG9+QO7RNCNGvJXe2LTD7I77Xzfeg8u JlWSd3ZmJ31UsWXE4ZWC8wnome2KQWc45tjDNN6js3ZVF79e5HrAcF0lU9Ofm6KgYTue5jyR p10ZpmkDMwu4HFwTWLqsdrON/I5Jyjrk8bojA8wfNvvV709M+UJzovD00+v0le5J5D3nd52/ S+LL8qCtuanGRS73dC4FzWYXZzi1lelcr6bWhZXQ1bDfOuxpAbrVyy+LnR436i57mf3T533n EIuup0umH6xC2+s4asGU9Liw/sPFZAYv33OtMoLWimsq3pgMNG2rels2w9PPlROgW3ZxTWw4 rQy0M+yIx8+A7tVzZZ15yrm4nrXn+YY1WcPwuCSc86Dn53NfKuhC6/hSwNfPp8wGvPekS8EY ixc8sWRG11R65QLoYtKCj6GqeOGTibH0SniWa9gbfdXTvCycc6BTM3GxruuZC8yDtsk9LFde bkArqadelN5z8qBf+Bvs+tj3q02RxzTbGeje+6BZpfJjOLmK6By95vl+dyC8iN4/AY1bZQSt Cfdr4Bn5Psvr2OdA47ZFgwhbsTCRRe6Zja6GNH+AVdA+/wuP5Lxop6s1BTTtvceaBI0V0E6d VtqVdm9obMbmgZuIX1o8Z5MPmKnrMJul4ayC9uRIlpYxtE9Bu6JxU2Gn1AcKCPhNlOvqCui/ HVlFLhzAXQX0E27Td2pnLDrNmIpRYz+nFoHTOLHPL+hafjI0JuXhrIJuCF+ajUCRT1VA2zKx KzwvveWbvQJLsQCmoC1h+dkbW6wbnB8ZaGeeEjoBnaYS5ch4lRahvA/x1FhGnvdn7u/ygNbE ft1bdrPvnli0pViM8KtNbk+2hgpWS0G/snK5MJfBNB60FLRSsgjayGYz/gFmV95SN02ezZwV UEMgfw5LxFkBLVA6FioCy0ArGfSxLUHzDRtH9ZDiJgE9Y/UbtVmqUYfjrUjQ9hhdBK30EI/p 6cMiHBxmdU6N4uLkWS9H0u4MaD4gjQf17pt9BWjeblPd0BfuYSBdNF1GphLOxJKgdasIOpsM lU7g/UkuaHIKyKqU/jyryH+8zwmDK0D/tNXVnJjWzCtA87nQVB2ilYJ+MC5tmKWgDXTZot8D fXqmQJ38/DI56HOgVQ+AnvH1Fv2XUq6fgm58CNqY/yegy6b3Ldq7xqKFI2+ejARal8jtuLio x0+DNk/qrH8J0MJH5zaMR+4VoHkVRkcpx8MtCnrA57T264mCm0HzKKfTPa3zS4AWgaqrLmQb 10QdwtUqs6FYQFDQfNVonp2YbgQt3VE5Evq/DlqMSHUd4Nu9K0DLHLstu0hrZNk73n25WKbV bH0ONP9mU83ot3+WJR36MWh5gMlNp2ttYlwDWi7HDdtjkWtVppApaE1MfdXslQOs14dV7XbQ XVzc3LZMU2+0y5NBeh80//4sV1ORWdOPQFsyi2S6g+lLPU3Js4lVvEBPu6+NaVit194B/X4c LZf/2cpdmzu0nx+rXwO0XHEZeFq1Kq1mmuT/CDRjJ9JDjlPIRwt/3dObbHBbQ5ym/W61aNQW 2ZVOl6H2GyLD9UUsOk2n9xys69g9k/i/ABpNzcs7LDOZA8Tzl5e5qJZtldwMWvo0A/dqL4OO GELl2U35CPQJr6tBo2luA8bNkkpED2kK33GkV3FbnwGt7I49pXU6ZV6uFPcMa3nShnEtaDQ2 0rY79huPNQToyuRkh4yfAbgdNClaXHE+leT8xlWgkTZVN5efem33WtCo0mzY2LZtbAx8lANN ZtX8lrXjeuiToFG1sLNud0oe3w1NhyrdnPA6cs/PwI3Ws05vYnaug/5ys+HZxvSCOc2q0vrV cXvs0wZXzXwvjHuZBTp4LiKQLqszt31tuOxrKGj2YcoJ8prNLkjy1kt6AoUEMeaw7Gfaxi9M g/Q7Na9W1zHW3flYQ60Bu0ka57NfL1ku3eO3BAirm5uJRHo1S39U2nOX2rup1wdpECbqVA/V TvnXkKVPm9efLSlnL4ULrdEEszGEJ6N+yTGfV6XvV1vXj8SKP5vb2FUv8ckwt3ajh+/GY6/1 Oz0pHUPjcbX/3U5oXlBDp2NYpSrSJvrXtLPSSgTKTroCtvjKJ79ZA/q0WnLpPmZDuOKJkwFm qRcQX1Hyf3mZndpwOq+LAKNkm6PfQZY80mRk67T0mBzoN+rcIUe9RMexvhFpXDzvq3IOFlTL 66sLV+zsZLRcLNbh6e1gwy4Gq/Uf6D1qunoSHddVvxHE281ms/0F0HHE/tmtVpvd/hT0joM+ rE4K7pPoGHxzox7o2CYLaNfGesPLzYNBnPxaXeFBgCb/LLeXQJ9RsNyvttF3t2qtOh5Np6N2 t7ioTEEfF2tCITpG+ygkrIKE/BUeEUrWSUQeSYIjMd/jOjkqoPcHWnC9pw8co2SRCNDHIzqG KDhGa1onivZrUi/ah/zPP1NBvI+iKEDLHfMESXzYJcttgPa7BUKHJVrFq+1hh9Bus9uwhw5b AToJj1vyDLu2C9CBuKDdmoFexSEit8J4uzrEARkD21Uc7/9YxAL0IY7j3SLcEeNdHIIkXlCI IdpsNyiKwyM10A0BHW8IMfqQGP5hvNvtDiEFTq4R0OR56koI6BW1+c2CPR4RwJsNrfKPBx0v wpCMceoECKSEQgq26yg+xuF+i5YEErFuYtGE55q6ZNV1LOJgH9Nr1KJJmEEKkMk1Jt3BQZOp b7tHzJgPAJr5aMZQgkbL1XpDUK0WZ0AnCmjSHWdAUwvOgaaRHrgODvrIXEcccIzhgRhgciCu NqE8NwJ0znVQiutdxK/FGejdMYqXOdDLOAyWAHrHo46VnAwpxmBL/oniAwG1EZPhPwl/aHuQ Fr3dxnTCZNcIUurcSRQS/BOSXtuzyfCfgLuM5Y4886eDRknE/z0uFyEN79iSgsZ1NEKj95dJ kMjHkiUJ5dgTQXJM+LXjck8fOLLSNA5Mwzv2k4R1EQrAdfwP2pKAZb2LAMR/rehAIkEw6P8F dfjNcxwgEAgEAoFAIBAIBAKBQCAQCAQCgUAgEAgEAoFAIBAIBAKBQCAQCPQ79a8AAwDYcO4B DQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTEgMCBvYmoNPDwvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL0ZpcnN0 IDMwNi9MZW5ndGggODYxL04gNDAvVHlwZS9PYmpTdG0+PnN0cmVhbQ0KaN68Vk1vEzEQ3Z8y RziA1x/7JaFIaUpFldJGTRGHqIdt6oZVN+vI2QD988CzvY0SOICR4BCPx/vmzdsZe52CUiqJ pylVxLmbkRQwnKQqiAvK04y4pDIVxBVVkhPPqKrg5QBLDIClZUoumAtF3BHlJQksCRAIRIgs J4EQiTxCwipFDirLigT4lYQPKlUVJMCXqYyciqwCHny5zEiCL0cep6BAkARfUcAHXwlNoOBl Dh98FUQ7aVUGH3xVBd9JUvCRMi0zwlRAECkOaZkgBakCOCUhEbxeYqrISVFFRQqvoKqK3rxh k7bebt/XG1QupWs2Re2cndVWd/2N1dqV8XjlUn/tp/qJOLs2rXaxKLGD3DxtNJv3drf0uGtj +tEIOS6NXdetUwmUX5ku0AA4rgHe5MEUwZTBeCmu+N7wYEQwMpjAIgKLCOEihIsQLkO4DOEy hMsQLkO4DOEyiJCBRQYW6Vlu2UXdrV68vXz1YZ68ZDPyGDZnc70c3nG33i7cNvFwv3RqzWZS b9hZs9pZzd52953pNaqB4cy0rfmi79+hZLZtukc239Qdlk1/ALL1WrPT5jP7CXbeYa7nn2rU e2APNWYzdrXr3cMAPIKgM82jNrt+eLa72y5ts9m7SHG4cHM1xm/i7LmbuOFsWDl7XsFWODFf vcYP3b3XGFKPRgseivxPOp3/p76jjeOFysMeGLf9i2/fk/NkndTJKtEJJRbjNtklbdLDe0gM VgjzOuk8wiYNZg5559cevb9KsImmlGIjheqw2YoyOeypg+76fTQeTg6bPHd5uq/tLSiqXxgC 7Dh4SiICKyOwKgKbRWDzCGwRgS0jsFUElqcxYP7n4AW+KirsVcWHM/Xbxvs9omTYubMh8Ai8 /6j8oi2mSzymTTymTzymUTymUyKmU4LHgGMOmYg5ZSLmmImYDoqYDorfdhD33Dmugq6n9HXK rnBzPg13zlKPH3pt/bp3T/SDsTr4fW37gzh3s4zbZtWFJ94/ePzRNn3Trd6be80u7M3ds0yx f6cgcbgioHB/PXnoXpbjPdVLY+u+Md3EtMYukICG3+1PAP8X55hq7P5eDcnyv0/G/yjZwQtd PJ/cE9zAi8px5DzDKHM3L4SXv889a1HwNeo33C+j0Q8BBgAhicikDQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5k b2JqDTIgMCBvYmoNPDwvRmlsdGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL0ZpcnN0IDExL0xlbmd0aCA0NC9O IDIvVHlwZS9PYmpTdG0+PnN0cmVhbQ0KaN4yMVcwUDCxUDC0VLCx0fcrzS2OBvMNFIJi7eyA QsH6LnZ2AAEGAKT7CNcNCmVuZHN0cmVhbQ1lbmRvYmoNMyAwIG9iag08PC9MZW5ndGggMzky Ni9TdWJ0eXBlL1hNTC9UeXBlL01ldGFkYXRhPj5zdHJlYW0NCjw/eHBhY2tldCBiZWdpbj0i 77u/IiBpZD0iVzVNME1wQ2VoaUh6cmVTek5UY3prYzlkIj8+Cjx4OnhtcG1ldGEgeG1sbnM6 eD0iYWRvYmU6bnM6bWV0YS8iIHg6eG1wdGs9IkFkb2JlIFhNUCBDb3JlIDUuNC1jMDA1IDc4 LjE0NzMyNiwgMjAxMi8wOC8yMy0xMzowMzowMyAgICAgICAgIj4KICAgPHJkZjpSREYgeG1s bnM6cmRmPSJodHRwOi8vd3d3LnczLm9yZy8xOTk5LzAyLzIyLXJkZi1zeW50YXgtbnMjIj4K ICAgICAgPHJkZjpEZXNjcmlwdGlvbiByZGY6YWJvdXQ9IiIKICAgICAgICAgICAgeG1sbnM6 eG1wPSJodHRwOi8vbnMuYWRvYmUuY29tL3hhcC8xLjAvIgogICAgICAgICAgICB4bWxuczpw ZGY9Imh0dHA6Ly9ucy5hZG9iZS5jb20vcGRmLzEuMy8iCiAgICAgICAgICAgIHhtbG5zOmRj PSJodHRwOi8vcHVybC5vcmcvZGMvZWxlbWVudHMvMS4xLyIKICAgICAgICAgICAgeG1sbnM6 eG1wTU09Imh0dHA6Ly9ucy5hZG9iZS5jb20veGFwLzEuMC9tbS8iCiAgICAgICAgICAgIHht bG5zOnBkZng9Imh0dHA6Ly9ucy5hZG9iZS5jb20vcGRmeC8xLjMvIj4KICAgICAgICAgPHht cDpDcmVhdGVEYXRlPjIwMTYtMDUtMTJUMDg6NDQ6NDktMDQ6MDA8L3htcDpDcmVhdGVEYXRl PgogICAgICAgICA8eG1wOkNyZWF0b3JUb29sPkFjcm9iYXQgUERGTWFrZXIgMTEgZm9yIFdv cmQ8L3htcDpDcmVhdG9yVG9vbD4KICAgICAgICAgPHhtcDpNb2RpZnlEYXRlPjIwMTYtMDUt MjJUMDU6MjE6NDEtMDQ6MDA8L3htcDpNb2RpZnlEYXRlPgogICAgICAgICA8eG1wOk1ldGFk YXRhRGF0ZT4yMDE2LTA1LTIyVDA1OjIxOjQxLTA0OjAwPC94bXA6TWV0YWRhdGFEYXRlPgog ICAgICAgICA8cGRmOlByb2R1Y2VyPkFjcm9iYXQgRGlzdGlsbGVyIDExLjAgKFdpbmRvd3Mp PC9wZGY6UHJvZHVjZXI+CiAgICAgICAgIDxwZGY6S2V5d29yZHMvPgogICAgICAgICA8ZGM6 Zm9ybWF0PmFwcGxpY2F0aW9uL3BkZjwvZGM6Zm9ybWF0PgogICAgICAgICA8ZGM6Y3JlYXRv cj4KICAgICAgICAgICAgPHJkZjpTZXE+CiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIDxyZGY6bGk+R0hUPC9y ZGY6bGk+CiAgICAgICAgICAgIDwvcmRmOlNlcT4KICAgICAgICAgPC9kYzpjcmVhdG9yPgog ICAgICAgICA8ZGM6dGl0bGU+CiAgICAgICAgICAgIDxyZGY6QWx0PgogICAgICAgICAgICAg ICA8cmRmOmxpIHhtbDpsYW5nPSJ4LWRlZmF1bHQiPiA8L3JkZjpsaT4KICAgICAgICAgICAg PC9yZGY6QWx0PgogICAgICAgICA8L2RjOnRpdGxlPgogICAgICAgICA8ZGM6ZGVzY3JpcHRp b24+CiAgICAgICAgICAgIDxyZGY6QWx0PgogICAgICAgICAgICAgICA8cmRmOmxpIHhtbDps YW5nPSJ4LWRlZmF1bHQiLz4KICAgICAgICAgICAgPC9yZGY6QWx0PgogICAgICAgICA8L2Rj OmRlc2NyaXB0aW9uPgogICAgICAgICA8eG1wTU06RG9jdW1lbnRJRD51dWlkOjg4ZGQzM2E0 LTA0NjAtNDQwZS1hZDg0LTYyOTk2ZGZlMmY4YzwveG1wTU06RG9jdW1lbnRJRD4KICAgICAg ICAgPHhtcE1NOkluc3RhbmNlSUQ+dXVpZDplOGZlOTRkMy1mYjZiLTQzMWQtYjZhYS05NmRm Mjk1Y2U0ZmI8L3htcE1NOkluc3RhbmNlSUQ+CiAgICAgICAgIDx4bXBNTTpzdWJqZWN0Pgog ICAgICAgICAgICA8cmRmOlNlcT4KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgPHJkZjpsaT4zPC9yZGY6bGk+ CiAgICAgICAgICAgIDwvcmRmOlNlcT4KICAgICAgICAgPC94bXBNTTpzdWJqZWN0PgogICAg ICAgICA8cGRmeDpDb21wYW55Lz4KICAgICAgICAgPHBkZng6Q29tbWVudHMvPgogICAgICAg ICA8cGRmeDpTb3VyY2VNb2RpZmllZD5EOjIwMTYwNTEyMTI0NDI1PC9wZGZ4OlNvdXJjZU1v ZGlmaWVkPgogICAgICA8L3JkZjpEZXNjcmlwdGlvbj4KICAgPC9yZGY6UkRGPgo8L3g6eG1w bWV0YT4KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIAog ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAKICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIAogICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAKICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg IAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgCiAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAKICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIAogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgCiAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg IAo8P3hwYWNrZXQgZW5kPSJ3Ij8+DQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5kb2JqDTQgMCBvYmoNPDwvRmls dGVyL0ZsYXRlRGVjb2RlL0ZpcnN0IDUvTGVuZ3RoIDUwL04gMS9UeXBlL09ialN0bT4+c3Ry ZWFtDQpo3jKxVDBQsLHRd84vzStRMNT3zkwpjjY1BgoGxeqHVBak6gckpqcW29kBBBgA6NoL 5w0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag01IDAgb2JqDTw8L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29kZS9GaXJz dCA1L0xlbmd0aCAxOTgvTiAxL1R5cGUvT2JqU3RtPj5zdHJlYW0NCmjeVM7NCsIwEATgV8nN 5KDdhFRUpFAsKoggKHjxEpsVo7UraYr49kYRfw4Lcxi+2RQYsPE4ydtwJM9n841IJnS5YB0a /opXU9+fyaMJjurCBOTFSIHsQyoVDLTWwy7oDkDn3YpOXnram8BWxXRpzuiZlOxAnm3JW5Es 8H6L4TmwJPsnKhVPavkRV55sW+KXLFwTXFW9zB6wHd+62tKt2QmRrKn1JUbTHRzanzel0lql sdDuT1iGOLxxoULORJY9BBgALGZNDQ0KZW5kc3RyZWFtDWVuZG9iag02IDAgb2JqDTw8L0Rl Y29kZVBhcm1zPDwvQ29sdW1ucyA0L1ByZWRpY3RvciAxMj4+L0ZpbHRlci9GbGF0ZURlY29k ZS9JRFs8RUVCMDEzQTFEOTZGMTA3RDVGNjg4MTc1ODE4ODM3MEM+PDk3RUE1NTExMkJBMUVB NEY4OTg3RUQ4RjIwRkVGNzI1Pl0vSW5mbyA1MCAwIFIvTGVuZ3RoIDU2L1Jvb3QgNTIgMCBS L1NpemUgNTEvVHlwZS9YUmVmL1dbMSAyIDFdPj5zdHJlYW0NCmjeYmIAAiZG5fcMTAwse4EE YyeQ4F8MYvWBCGWg7PEKIIuBgXHIE4w3YSym/yAuA0CAAQDpiwduDQplbmRzdHJlYW0NZW5k b2JqDXN0YXJ0eHJlZg0KMTE2DQolJUVPRg0KRg== --= Multipart Boundary 0522160858-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun May 22 14:08:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61A8B45596 for ; Sun, 22 May 2016 14:08:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ndenev@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 834891FDF for ; Sun, 22 May 2016 14:08:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ndenev@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id i142so6018886wmf.0 for ; Sun, 22 May 2016 07:08:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=mlUTx7hk9INXFQHF5Y7eW4sfGXTqVDiM88ktJ1oPttk=; b=mQ4+gHWzn+UBurZqSV54UPQYAhoWZKoX1ILo8XQVYyB321E16LjrYEugd5rT64IW4H doZLo54kx+iNp0qFHytq6KGV5SzaFqUNizZtfOlFui1xsevJ3OxWZEUQNY+T6sDqJxkC 6aKE82LmTsFHhBs9/uQChQagGSBb2xWq1osegC+bybZySWoLrwP0uyZrrOi6axmzAriZ SfyRwqUlssI1NaBJ0pmmK5N601GoynN0kHxCXvRWDW9bKuffPmfzrg01jiguigG9sSKC twfa3/Z46p5xr2ExmD9xAA2WqrAeE7nmPxbhr/mG92n1ZNnn59p4/FF3au7izoyVc+lH QdWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=mlUTx7hk9INXFQHF5Y7eW4sfGXTqVDiM88ktJ1oPttk=; b=meiUGugaPOJh1jZP1p/4fI2aFHMafiBXVlPn2zCIkveoQJdEpgVjKMTIQerVCtuHTj umD9lvBnDYsAbDNBz0axOEwtXQboWNL5Iyf2reZDwyk/3AM6mmbDa8jxxNH3vYLEfpVT AbsL5vyM25A9JNaM4w/WH+S5sMQzgq5eQASTzec6//gyZeAqUPIlEAbgc2WKPiBWbMYp uq9lB81xR3D6oHsrAWzJmx63ZiaE1+CReG8XudCW28ylJ+PdWIExL/52BaX94OJyYUSc V9bTvRk0QXKbpe5+gvBQpQExmH+AiDkFcjfWrqOqXf7TJY8K7TbiaIm5pkYuihm3NA70 m40A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVgVsKcttvTK05yX269u78B/UElYt7coi6tvGr9c42b56Ryo9OKvy4eOO7o2HNFRbXcdY+WrfYgfk0lcQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.133.135 with SMTP id pc7mr12217215wjb.49.1463926092579; Sun, 22 May 2016 07:08:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.143.19 with HTTP; Sun, 22 May 2016 07:08:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 16:08:12 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: epair(4) + bridge(4) + pf(4) nat strangeness From: Nikolay Denev To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 14:08:15 -0000 Hi, I'm seeing something strange on my home router that I can't really explain so any suggestions are welcome. The machine is an Alix APU running FreeBSD mars.home.lan 10.3-STABLE FreeBSD 10.3-STABLE #7: Wed May 18 19:03:58 UTC 2016 root@mars.home.lan:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MARS amd64 It is compiled from svn rev 299223 with added the Codel+Pie patch for ipfw which is not in use at the moment as ipfw has a single pass rule, and the rest is in pf.conf (also in pf.conf I use ALTQ_CODEL) re2 interface is connected to the ISP and pf.conf has "nat on re2" statement, internal LAN network is connected to re0 and wireless clients on wlan0, both are bridged in bridge0. Since I wanted to run Suricata IDS for all internal traffic (both LAN and WLAN), I have created a epair(4) interface, with one end added as "span" port in bridge0, and the other I'm using in Suricata. And here is where the strange stuff happens. For some reason on this epair0b interface I'm seeing what it looks like duplicated traffic from before and after being NATed. For example, short tcpdump on epair0b shows this: 13:54:22.352206 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 29857, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 1480) 10.0.0.13.51413 > XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX.12325: Flags [.], cksum 0xbca8 (correct), seq 59040:60480, ack 88, win 1035, length 1440 13:54:22.355368 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 63, id 29856, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 1480) ZZZ.ZZZ.ZZZ.ZZZ.51413 > XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX.12325: Flags [.], cksum 0x69d8 (correct), seq 59040:60480, ack 88, win 1035, length 1440 10.0.0.13 here is another FreeBSD box running transmission bt client, and XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX is some random peer on the internet, but after this I see on the interface the second packet which looks identical with ip id minus one, and ZZZ.ZZZ.ZZZ.ZZZ is my public IP address assigned to re2. When doing tcpdump directly on bridge0, re0 or wlan0 I do not see this. --Nikolay From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun May 22 21:00:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D306BB45C16 for ; Sun, 22 May 2016 21:00:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1A9B1F92 for ; Sun, 22 May 2016 21:00:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4ML01Jk049096 for ; Sun, 22 May 2016 21:00:50 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201605222100.u4ML01Jk049096@kenobi.freebsd.org> From: bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem reports for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org that need special attention Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 21:00:50 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 21:00:51 -0000 To view an individual PR, use: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users, which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. Status | Bug Id | Description ------------+-----------+--------------------------------------------------- In Progress | 193452 | Dell PowerEdge 210 II -- Kernel panic bce (broadc In Progress | 203422 | mpd/ppoe not working with re(4) with revision 285 In Progress | 206581 | bxe_ioctl_nvram handler is faulty New | 204438 | setsockopt() handling of kern.ipc.maxsockbuf limi New | 205592 | TCP processing in IPSec causes kernel panic New | 206053 | kqueue support code of netmap causes panic Open | 148807 | [panic] 8.1-RELEASE/10.1-STABLE "panic: sbdrop" a Open | 194485 | Userland cannot add IPv6 prefix routes Open | 194515 | Fatal Trap 12 Kernel with vimage Open | 199136 | [if_tap] Added down_on_close sysctl variable to t Open | 201694 | 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jail Open | 206544 | sendmsg(2) (sendto(2) too?) can fail with EINVAL; 12 problems total for which you should take action. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon May 23 03:31:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2E7B462AE; Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [78.47.246.247]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CD0C1706; Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u4N3V6M7046751 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 23 May 2016 05:31:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: ler@lerctr.org Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4N3V1Bt024465; Mon, 23 May 2016 10:31:01 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: NAT SIP ALG To: Larry Rosenman References: <5734D478.2010809@grosbein.net> <9F55FBCB-4B1A-4134-8912-9A5B25F37703@Lodge.me.uk> <5735C8FB.908@grosbein.net> <027cf5fb5beaf0ab01045f49a4a2adb1@thebighonker.lerctr.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, James Lodge , owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: Eugene Grosbein X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <57427975.4070404@grosbein.net> Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 10:31:01 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <027cf5fb5beaf0ab01045f49a4a2adb1@thebighonker.lerctr.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q, LOCAL_FROM autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Report: * 0.0 DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q Date: is 4 days to 4 months after Received: date * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hz.grosbein.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:20 -0000 On 13.05.2016 20:32, Larry Rosenman wrote: > On 2016-05-13 07:30, Eugene Grosbein wrote: >> 13.05.2016 5:26, James Lodge wrote: >> >>> I use siproxd on pfsense and it works really well. >> >> How do you use them? >> >> I have SIP PBX inside private network that has old slow Cisco router as >> NAT box. >> >> The PBX registers with several distinct external SIP providers and >> accepts external >> calls for local call center. I need to replace Cisco router with >> something having much >> more horsepower and consider FreeBSD/amd64 but need to make sure SIP >> won't break. >> >> Will siproxd help me in such case? I still need the PBX to be able to >> register >> directly to external SIP providers as it is administrated by outsourced >> company. >> > > My asterisk server (pbx) registers through my NAT without ANY rules or > what have you. I do have the NAT > option turned on for the 4 providers I connect to. > > That said, sipoxd/pfSense may work as well. I do go through pfSense, > but again do NOT have any SUP proxying. The asterisk server just keeps > a registration open. > > I can get and receive calls. This network uses Asterisk too as internal IP PBX. My router has two external internet connections supplied by distinct ISPs. Internal PBX makes outgoing call using external SIP provider and uses something like this in the first INVITE packet: Content-Type: application/sdp. Content-Length: 268. . v=0. o=root 653657088 653657089 IN IP4 172.19.8.27. s=SimplePBX. c=IN IP4 172.19.8.27. Intelligent NAT ALG should replace noted internal IP with one of its external addresses corresponding to used IP route to SIP provider. How can incoming voice RTP traffic pass without such translation? Eugene Grosbein From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon May 23 03:49:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB656B46895 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 03:49:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: from box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (box-fra-01.niklaas.eu [46.165.253.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79BF212E7 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 03:49:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: by box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B0CAD61FE8; Mon, 23 May 2016 05:48:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 05:48:55 +0200 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: tinc and IPv6 routing, or: how to set up a local IPv6 Message-ID: <20160523034855.GA37797@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 03:49:05 -0000 Hello, I alread consulted freebsd-questions@ [1] but I have remained unsuccessful to solve the following issue. In case this is something obvious, please bear with me. I am not a professional, it's just my hobby to play around with computers. 1: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160519124446.GB2444 I am trying to set up a tinc VPN that connects two servers. In fact, the VPN is working for IPv4, but I cannot get it work for IPv6. Because of this, I assume it's rather a routing problem with IPv6 than a problem with tinc. To be honest, I don't have any experience setting up a local IPv6; so I guess that I'm doing something wrong here. What's working though is public IPv6 connectivity for both machines. The main aim is to connect several jails that are running on two different machines. The jails are in IPv4 networks 10.1.0.0/16 (machine A) and 10.2.0.0/16 (machine B), and in IPv6 networks fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1::/96 (machine A) and fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2::/96 (machine B) respectively. Both on lo1. What follows is, first, system related configuration; and, second, tinc related configuration. The mail is rather lenghty but this should get all important information in place. With tinc's current configuration I end up with the following routing tables: A $ netstat -rn | grep -e 'fd16' -e '10\.' 10.0.0.0/8 link#4 U tap0 10.1.0.1 link#4 UHS lo0 10.1.1.1 link#3 UH lo1 10.2.0.0/16 10.1.0.1 UGS tap0 10.2.0.1 10.1.0.1 UGHS tap0 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::/80 link#4 U tap0 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::1:0:0/96 link#3 U lo1 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::1:0:1 link#4 UHS lo0 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::1:1:1 link#3 UHS lo0 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::2:0:0/96 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::1:0:1 UGS lo1 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::2:0:1 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::1:0:1 UGHS lo1 ff01::%lo1/32 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::1:1:1 U lo1 ff01::%tap0/32 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::1:0:1 U tap0 ff02::%lo1/32 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::1:1:1 U lo1 ff02::%tap0/32 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::1:0:1 U tap0 B $ netstat -rn | grep -e 'fd16' -e '10\.' 10.0.0.0/8 link#4 U tap0 10.1.0.0/16 10.2.0.1 UGS tap0 10.1.0.1 10.2.0.1 UGHS tap0 10.2.0.1 link#4 UHS lo0 10.2.1.1 link#3 UH lo1 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::/80 link#4 U tap0 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::1:0:0/96 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::2:0:1 UGS lo1 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::1:0:1 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::2:0:1 UGHS lo1 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::2:0:0/96 link#3 U lo1 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::2:0:1 link#4 UHS lo0 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::2:1:1 link#3 UHS lo0 ff01::%lo1/32 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::2:1:1 U lo1 ff01::%tap0/32 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::2:0:1 U tap0 ff02::%lo1/32 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::2:1:1 U lo1 ff02::%tap0/32 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::2:0:1 U tap0 Note: 10.{1,2}.1.1 are two jails running on machine A and B respectively. These jails have also assigned IPv6 addresses fd16:dcc0:f4cc::{1,2}:1:1 respectively. 10.{1,2}.0.1 and fd16:dcc0:f4cc::{1,2}:0:1 are manually assigned because tinc's documentation asks you to do so, see configuration below. So, on both machines I can `ping 10.{1,2}.{0,1}.1` and I get a response. But if I `ping6 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::{1,2}:{0,1}:1` I only get a response from the machine the ping6 originates from; that is, routing over the VPN seems to work for IPv4 but not for IPv6. This is how the interfaces look like: A $ ifconfig tap0 tap0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=80000 ether 00:bd:6b:e5:19:00 inet6 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::1:0:1 prefixlen 80 inet6 fe80::2bd:6bff:fee5:1900%tap0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 inet 10.1.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 10.255.255.255 nd6 options=23 media: Ethernet autoselect status: active Opened by PID 6110 B $ ifconfig tap0 tap0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=80000 ether 00:bd:60:ca:17:00 inet6 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::2:0:1 prefixlen 80 inet6 fe80::2bd:60ff:feca:1700%tap0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 inet 10.2.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 broadcast 10.255.255.255 nd6 options=23 media: Ethernet autoselect status: active Opened by PID 16037 I have ipv6_gateway_enable="YES" /etc/rc.conf. See also: A $ sysctl net.inet6.ip6.forwarding net.inet6.ip6.forwarding: 1 B $ sysctl net.inet6.ip6.forwarding net.inet6.ip6.forwarding: 1 I don't think it's a firewall problem because I have set skip on { lo0 tap0 } in /etc/pf.conf, and IPv4 VPN is working. Further, I've already tried disabling the firewall without any success: IPv4 worked while IPv6 didn't. The following is the tinc-up script on each machine that assignes IP addresses and creates routes. I commented out some variations that I tried but haven't had success with either: A $ cat /usr/local/etc/tinc/klaas/tinc-up ifconfig $INTERFACE inet6 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 prefixlen 80 route -6 add -host fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2:0:1 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 route -6 add -net fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2::/96 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 #route -6 add -ifp $INTERFACE -host fd16:dcc0:f4cc::2:0:1 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::1:0:1 #route -6 add -ifp $INTERFACE -net fd16:dcc0:f4cc::2:0:0/96 fd16:dcc0:f4cc::1:0:1 ifconfig $INTERFACE 10.1.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 route -4 add -host 10.2.0.1 10.1.0.1 route -4 add -net 10.2.0.0/16 10.1.0.1 This looks pretty the same on machine B. $INTERFACE gets expanded to the interface that is set in tinc.conf: tap0. I tried the variants with explicitly setting `-ifp $INTERFACE` because I realised that vvv fd16:dcc0:f4cc::1:0:0/96 link#3 U lo1 although vvvv 10.2.0.0/16 10.1.0.1 UGS tap0 Explicitly setting the interface changes the first entry above to tap0. Still I cannot ping the other machine over the VPN via IPv6 though. Whether routing for the IPv6 network is set on lo1 or tap0 also depends on whether I start the jails or the tinc daemon first. I don't know whether that is an important issue. Furhter, I am not sure whether I need to have rtadv running, and if I have to, on which interface, lo1 or tap0? I tried to do so but I get errors, and still couldn't ping the other side of the VPN: A $ cat /etc/rtadvd.conf tap0:\ :addrs#1:addr="fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0::":prefixlen#80:tc=ether: A $ cat /etc/rc.conf rtadvd_enable="YES" rtadvd_interfaces="tap0" A $ grep rtadvd /var/log/messages May 19 10:36:18 A rtadvd[76279]: inet_pton failed for fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1: May 19 10:36:18 A rtadvd[76279]: inet_pton failed for fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1: May 19 10:36:34 A rtadvd[76279]: non-zero lifetime RA on RA receiving interface tap0. Ignored. May 19 10:41:24 A rtadvd[77128]: inet_pton failed for fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1: May 19 10:41:40 A rtadvd[77128]: non-zero lifetime RA on RA receiving interface tap0. Ignored. May 19 10:43:12 A rtadvd[77441]: inet_pton failed for fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1: May 19 10:43:28 A rtadvd[77441]: non-zero lifetime RA on RA receiving interface tap0. Ignored. May 19 10:52:50 A rtadvd[77441]: non-zero lifetime RA on RA receiving interface tap0. Ignored. May 19 12:19:19 A rtadvd[95216]: inet_pton failed for fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1: May 19 12:19:35 A rtadvd[95216]: non-zero lifetime RA on RA receiving interface tap0. Ignored. For those that know tinc: This is tinc.conf on machine A: Name = A ConnectTo = B BindToAddress = BindToAddress = Device = /dev/tap0 It looks pretty the same for machine B. Since the tinc daemons can connect, I assume everything is set up correctly here. This is the host configuration file for A: Address = A.domain.tld Subnet = fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1::/96 Subnet = 10.1.0.0/16 -----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY----- -----END RSA PUBLIC KEY----- Again, the configuration file for machine B looks pretty the same. Except that the subnets are the ones mentioned above. Any help is very much appreciated! Niklaas From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon May 23 09:50:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A4B8B44DCA for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 09:50:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4EBF1AED for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 09:50:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4N9ofqe024330 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 09:50:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 09:50:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: nick@van-laarhoven.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 09:50:43 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166255 --- Comment #12 from Nick Hibma --- This has been MFC-ed to 10-STABLE. I'm not quite sure how to mark this bug as resolved now though. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon May 23 09:54:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42966B47079 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 09:54:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 331DC1F39 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 09:54:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4N9sYWV036271 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 09:54:35 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 09:54:35 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: borjam@sarenet.es X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 09:54:35 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166255 --- Comment #13 from borjam@sarenet.es --- (In reply to eugen from comment #10) Would be better to make it a loader only tunable, and read only at run time, indeed! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon May 23 10:05:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDECDB4734C for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 10:05:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE64F1373 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 10:05:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4NA5DfB095542 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 10:05:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 10:05:13 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: hselasky@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 10:05:13 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166255 Hans Petter Selasky changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hselasky@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #14 from Hans Petter Selasky --- Maybe use "CTLFLAG_RDTUN" ?? 118 SYSCTL_INT(_net_link, OID_AUTO, log_promisc_mode_change, CTLFLAG_R= W, 119 &log_promisc_mode_change, 1, 120 "log promiscuous mode change events"); --HPS --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon May 23 12:53:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7BEFB464C4 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 12:53:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B874710AF for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 12:53:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4NCrFhi004103 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 12:53:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209471] Listen queue overflow due to too many sockets stuck in CLOSED state Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 12:53:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rblayzor@inoc.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 12:53:15 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209471 --- Comment #20 from Robert Blayzor --- After several days now, we normally would see this bug hit. After adding the two sysctl knobs.. net.inet.tcp.drop_synfin=3D1 net.inet.tcp.nolocaltimewait=3D1 This seems to be mitigated on at least so far. I can certainly turn these o= ff and see if the problem appears again. I can't see how the above would be related to the issue we were having though... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon May 23 12:53:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EDF4B46526 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 12:53:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB56411C7 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 12:53:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4NCrONu004454 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 12:53:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209471] Listen queue overflow due to too many sockets stuck in CLOSED state Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 12:53:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: rblayzor@inoc.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_severity Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 12:53:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209471 Robert Blayzor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Mon May 23 16:23:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA005B46346 for ; Mon, 23 May 2016 16:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x233.google.com (mail-ig0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 846AE18E3; Mon, 23 May 2016 16:23:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-x233.google.com with SMTP id ww4so36443285igb.1; Mon, 23 May 2016 09:23:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=xSDlWxwzbvCR9yderd/rsfPQZZgb/sZk9tLnUmXK12E=; b=df0BQYTjsIAI57qeOCAYngic0WW+1klAgLUpCtk77QzRdjTDcw/qqAIWpZpOQezAd+ SFZQtYcsxEW6dP4l5f+FDpmlJua5lfIDl0ciYUhJF6tQPq0bpSrfuefoO0j31bMA7wmR riGM/r9y/SDU131hfuqiZxiqvlUE0S7wmMs0yfW2yL1VfTnbw0Fh2iskOP1GLBeGKq0B 4n/CP0HXq1ul0mNCrPtZ3fQ4NCBnZNog6ti5irm8mc/PEqgZPrJzkGvGJeIhrMm/eCOb vXEgScOBjYoYtqWQ0Fa6tP4umHYVLN+u7tcIGmC2gq19LLIETfSoOCfFyV9vdrJA71bA jbkw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=xSDlWxwzbvCR9yderd/rsfPQZZgb/sZk9tLnUmXK12E=; b=dH0tQ1fPd1qFJQExGPF74UdaeF5iXirGVHvi3v8hQHsbMx+2bWjNmUTGrnUOZTbloi ibDb9pI9OhZXdhwMHbZYpAx0NhasrLnz4+T10pm3lnCqS5TOqeLntMkD0kIBvGQBt1Fh X3jv8SXPRjuYECymANrxnTb2oxdcZAKC8QJDXOmU6Ps1Ot3vAEGqmmYSUheLMOVnxw01 /bQFNmRFygxpaLJE3iOSOAhFRNDrMdnFrajJNXh2Kwj/0gyXDXwm+v1rwLFrUGfaJQz+ QwXtKEEUR52M2lScTixMOhZw7UuX2njHyrCgLo2ZaD6IEOZltbuUpJ2IZznQs2Two3m2 8Row== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXwc6/wbetfZ8Jq5lo6ERvQMY9LhqnO9dxgTP6QeID1x7/E+F9Kxu8rrEGgFj9sea1JolOUgUrSxAzlyA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.131.201 with SMTP id oo9mr13796869igb.15.1464020611922; Mon, 23 May 2016 09:23:31 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.20.70 with HTTP; Mon, 23 May 2016 09:23:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 09:23:31 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wIpmNiJfqk6HwgdQaqgzoyO-Osw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages From: Kevin Oberman To: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2016 16:23:32 -0000 On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 2:54 AM, wrote: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166255 > > --- Comment #13 from borjam@sarenet.es --- > (In reply to eugen from comment #10) > > Would be better to make it a loader only tunable, and read only at run > time, > indeed! > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are the assignee for the bug. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > +1 The knowledge that an interface is being set to promiscuous mode is very important or security. Allowing it to be changed on a running system where that change is likely to go unnoticed leaving you unaware that your network is being snooped via a compromised system. While I don't like the idea of hiding these messages at all and think dealing with the issue through syslog.conf more appropriate, at least don't let the setting be changed on a running system! -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 24 00:57:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6C2B4816D for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:57:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA81E10E3 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:57:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 8B91D16141; Tue, 24 May 2016 00:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 00:57:49 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" Reply-to: D5872+325+9dea0574509cdbb3@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D5872: tcp: Don't prematurely drop receiving-only connections X-Herald-Rules: <64> X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: MmVmNzYzNzljOGQxMmM4MWI4MmNjYzcxMzczIFdDpw0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 00:57:50 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 24 01:00:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE11AB48246 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 01:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA75D1220 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 01:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 490C416268; Tue, 24 May 2016 01:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 01:00:14 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" Reply-to: D6406+325+76b767348064de43@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties Message-ID: <435c7b507ea899c4a387f08bf5ced730@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NTE3YjE0YWU1ZTZhYmMwODc0YTM1NDI5ZGZkIFdDp54= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 01:00:15 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 24 05:40:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 704D6B48768 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 05:40:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E191DD8 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 05:40:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 423C116701; Tue, 24 May 2016 05:40:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 05:40:05 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "hselasky (Hans Petter Selasky)" Reply-to: D6406+325+76b767348064de43@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties Message-ID: <4e25f3d3ab1b42a2e414dfdc5f3ba722@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NTE3YjE0YWU1ZTZhYmMwODc0YTM1NDI5ZGZkIFdD6TU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 05:40:06 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 24 05:42:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD0FB48891 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 05:42:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713011118 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 05:42:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 8D125168F5; Tue, 24 May 2016 05:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 05:42:58 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" Reply-to: D6406+325+76b767348064de43@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NTE3YjE0YWU1ZTZhYmMwODc0YTM1NDI5ZGZkIFdD6eI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 05:42:59 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 24 05:53:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18437B48D68 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 05:53:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B69851C3C for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 05:53:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id B1DBD16E0A; Tue, 24 May 2016 05:53:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 05:53:12 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "hselasky (Hans Petter Selasky)" Reply-to: D6406+325+76b767348064de43@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NTE3YjE0YWU1ZTZhYmMwODc0YTM1NDI5ZGZkIFdD7Eg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 05:53:15 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 24 06:00:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4E6B48F02 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:00:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 088FF1DAE for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:00:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 54E041605C; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:00:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 06:00:47 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" Reply-to: D6406+325+76b767348064de43@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties Message-ID: <2d1b0fd7f51a13c2265d2139a2be7d9b@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NTE3YjE0YWU1ZTZhYmMwODc0YTM1NDI5ZGZkIFdD7g8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 06:00:50 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 24 06:13:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10DAB481C4 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:13:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC7E18B6 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:13:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id A8F2A169B8; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:13:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 06:13:24 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "hselasky (Hans Petter Selasky)" Reply-to: D6406+325+76b767348064de43@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NTE3YjE0YWU1ZTZhYmMwODc0YTM1NDI5ZGZkIFdD8QQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 06:13:25 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 24 06:17:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A354FB4825B for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:17:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647A819FA for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:17:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 879AD16AE9; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:17:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 06:17:23 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "hselasky (Hans Petter Selasky)" Reply-to: D6406+325+76b767348064de43@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NTE3YjE0YWU1ZTZhYmMwODc0YTM1NDI5ZGZkIFdD8fM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 06:17:24 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 24 06:38:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63A2BB48705 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:38:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2346812C5 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:38:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 6680D1629B; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 06:38:32 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" Reply-to: D6406+325+76b767348064de43@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NTE3YjE0YWU1ZTZhYmMwODc0YTM1NDI5ZGZkIFdD9ug= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 06:38:33 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 24 06:38:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B2EB48745 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:38:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F74B13BC for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:38:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id F264D162F9; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:38:57 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 06:38:57 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" Reply-to: D6406+325+76b767348064de43@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties Message-ID: <9dd928f7dc68acd5625978ce0730dc0c@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , Thread-Topic: D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NTE3YjE0YWU1ZTZhYmMwODc0YTM1NDI5ZGZkIFdD9wE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 06:38:58 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 24 06:54:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AFCEB48B36 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:54:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A9E1E10 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:54:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id EC31A16966; Tue, 24 May 2016 06:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 06:54:55 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "hselasky (Hans Petter Selasky)" Reply-to: D6406+325+76b767348064de43@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties Message-ID: <8ac09942aa1d370ffa26a7253d0e3e72@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NTE3YjE0YWU1ZTZhYmMwODc0YTM1NDI5ZGZkIFdD+r8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 06:54:57 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 24 07:06:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E58B48F87 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 07:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A968E1675 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 07:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 2432D166BC; Tue, 24 May 2016 07:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 07:06:17 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" Reply-to: D6406+325+76b767348064de43@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NTE3YjE0YWU1ZTZhYmMwODc0YTM1NDI5ZGZkIFdD/Wk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 07:06:18 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 24 07:09:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA184B47193 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 07:09:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55801B0A for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 07:09:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 500BD167BB; Tue, 24 May 2016 07:09:07 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 07:09:07 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "hselasky (Hans Petter Selasky)" Reply-to: D6406+325+76b767348064de43@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NTE3YjE0YWU1ZTZhYmMwODc0YTM1NDI5ZGZkIFdD/hM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 07:09:08 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 24 07:13:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81955B4752F for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 07:13:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AEB914F0 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 07:13:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id CC77216A11; Tue, 24 May 2016 07:13:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 07:13:43 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" Reply-to: D6406+325+76b767348064de43@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: Thread-Topic: D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NTE3YjE0YWU1ZTZhYmMwODc0YTM1NDI5ZGZkIFdD/yc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 07:13:44 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 24 07:26:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07619B47C1F for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 07:26:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF5B1988 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 07:26:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id 29F4E16FB6; Tue, 24 May 2016 07:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 07:26:58 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "sepherosa_gmail.com (Sepherosa Ziehau)" Reply-to: D6406+325+76b767348064de43@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties Message-ID: <1f6b7f9035b7482063748ae62127c964@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , Thread-Topic: D6406: mbuf: Add a flag for M_HASHTYPE_ to indicate the type has hash properties X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NTE3YjE0YWU1ZTZhYmMwODc0YTM1NDI5ZGZkIFdEAkI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=utf-8; name="D6406.16790.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="D6406.16790.patch" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 07:26:59 -0000 ZGlmZiAtLWdpdCBhL3N5cy9zeXMvbWJ1Zi5oIGIvc3lzL3N5cy9tYnVmLmgKLS0tIGEvc3lzL3N5 cy9tYnVmLmgKKysrIGIvc3lzL3N5cy9tYnVmLmgKQEAgLTMxNiwzMCArMzE2LDQxIEBACiAgKgog ICogTW9zdCBOSUNzIHN1cHBvcnQgUlNTLCB3aGljaCBwcm92aWRlcyBvcmRlcmluZyBhbmQgZXhw bGljaXQgYWZmaW5pdHksIGFuZAogICogdXNlIHRoZSBoYXNoIG1fZmxhZyBiaXRzIHRvIGluZGlj YXRlIHdoYXQgaGVhZGVyIGZpZWxkcyB3ZXJlIGNvdmVyZWQgYnkKLSAqIHRoZSBoYXNoLiAgTV9I QVNIVFlQRV9PUEFRVUUgY2FuIGJlIHNldCBieSBub24tUlNTIGNhcmRzIG9yIGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRp b25zCi0gKiB0aGF0IHByb3ZpZGUgYW4gb3BhcXVlIGZsb3cgaWRlbnRpZmllciwgYWxsb3dpbmcg Zm9yIG9yZGVyaW5nIGFuZAotICogZGlzdHJpYnV0aW9uIHdpdGhvdXQgZXhwbGljaXQgYWZmaW5p dHkuCisgKiB0aGUgaGFzaC4gIE1fSEFTSFRZUEVfT1BBUVVFIGFuZCBNX0hBU0hUWVBFX09QQVFV RV9IQVNIIGNhbiBiZSBzZXQgYnkgbm9uLQorICogUlNTIGNhcmRzIG9yIGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb25z IHRoYXQgcHJvdmlkZSBhbiBvcGFxdWUgZmxvdyBpZGVudGlmaWVyLCBhbGxvd2luZworICogZm9y IG9yZGVyaW5nIGFuZCBkaXN0cmlidXRpb24gd2l0aG91dCBleHBsaWNpdCBhZmZpbml0eS4gIEFk ZGl0aW9uYWxseSwKKyAqIE1fSEFTSFRZUEVfT1BBUVVFX0hBU0ggaW5kaWNhdGVzIHRoYXQgdGhl IGZsb3cgaWRlbnRpZmllciBoYXMgaGFzaAorICogcHJvcGVydGllcy4KICAqLworI2RlZmluZQlN X0hBU0hUWVBFX0hBU0hQUk9QCQkweDgwCS8qIGhhcyBoYXNoIHByb3BlcnRpZXMgKi8KKyNkZWZp bmUJTV9IQVNIVFlQRV9IQVNIKHQpCQkoTV9IQVNIVFlQRV9IQVNIUFJPUCB8ICh0KSkKIC8qIE1p Y3Jvc29mdCBSU1Mgc3RhbmRhcmQgaGFzaCB0eXBlcyAqLwogI2RlZmluZQlNX0hBU0hUWVBFX05P TkUJCQkwCi0jZGVmaW5lCU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfUlNTX0lQVjQJCTEJLyogSVB2NCAyLXR1cGxlICov Ci0jZGVmaW5lCU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfUlNTX1RDUF9JUFY0CQkyCS8qIFRDUHY0IDQtdHVwbGUgKi8K LSNkZWZpbmUJTV9IQVNIVFlQRV9SU1NfSVBWNgkJMwkvKiBJUHY2IDItdHVwbGUgKi8KLSNkZWZp bmUJTV9IQVNIVFlQRV9SU1NfVENQX0lQVjYJCTQJLyogVENQdjYgNC10dXBsZSAqLwotI2RlZmlu ZQlNX0hBU0hUWVBFX1JTU19JUFY2X0VYCQk1CS8qIElQdjYgMi10dXBsZSArIGV4dCBoZHJzICov Ci0jZGVmaW5lCU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfUlNTX1RDUF9JUFY2X0VYCTYJLyogVENQdjYgNC10aXBsZSAr IGV4dCBoZHJzICovCisjZGVmaW5lCU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfUlNTX0lQVjQJCU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfSEFT SCgxKSAvKiBJUHY0IDItdHVwbGUgKi8KKyNkZWZpbmUJTV9IQVNIVFlQRV9SU1NfVENQX0lQVjQJ CU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfSEFTSCgyKSAvKiBUQ1B2NCA0LXR1cGxlICovCisjZGVmaW5lCU1fSEFTSFRZ UEVfUlNTX0lQVjYJCU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfSEFTSCgzKSAvKiBJUHY2IDItdHVwbGUgKi8KKyNkZWZp bmUJTV9IQVNIVFlQRV9SU1NfVENQX0lQVjYJCU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfSEFTSCg0KSAvKiBUQ1B2NiA0 LXR1cGxlICovCisjZGVmaW5lCU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfUlNTX0lQVjZfRVgJCU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfSEFT SCg1KSAvKiBJUHY2IDItdHVwbGUgKworCQkJCQkJCSAgICAqIGV4dCBoZHJzICovCisjZGVmaW5l CU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfUlNTX1RDUF9JUFY2X0VYCU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfSEFTSCg2KSAvKiBUQ1B2NiA0 LXRpcGxlICsKKwkJCQkJCQkgICAgKiBleHQgaGRycyAqLwogLyogTm9uLXN0YW5kYXJkIFJTUyBo YXNoIHR5cGVzICovCi0jZGVmaW5lCU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfUlNTX1VEUF9JUFY0CQk3CS8qIElQdjQg VURQIDQtdHVwbGUgKi8KLSNkZWZpbmUJTV9IQVNIVFlQRV9SU1NfVURQX0lQVjRfRVgJOAkvKiBJ UHY0IFVEUCA0LXR1cGxlICsgZXh0IGhkcnMgKi8KLSNkZWZpbmUJTV9IQVNIVFlQRV9SU1NfVURQ X0lQVjYJCTkJLyogSVB2NiBVRFAgNC10dXBsZSAqLwotI2RlZmluZQlNX0hBU0hUWVBFX1JTU19V RFBfSVBWNl9FWAkxMAkvKiBJUHY2IFVEUCA0LXR1cGxlICsgZXh0IGhkcnMgKi8KKyNkZWZpbmUJ TV9IQVNIVFlQRV9SU1NfVURQX0lQVjQJCU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfSEFTSCg3KSAvKiBJUHY0IFVEUCA0 LXR1cGxlKi8KKyNkZWZpbmUJTV9IQVNIVFlQRV9SU1NfVURQX0lQVjRfRVgJTV9IQVNIVFlQRV9I QVNIKDgpIC8qIElQdjQgVURQIDQtdHVwbGUgKworCQkJCQkJCSAgICAqIGV4dCBoZHJzICovCisj ZGVmaW5lCU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfUlNTX1VEUF9JUFY2CQlNX0hBU0hUWVBFX0hBU0goOSkgLyogSVB2 NiBVRFAgNC10dXBsZSovCisjZGVmaW5lCU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfUlNTX1VEUF9JUFY2X0VYCU1fSEFT SFRZUEVfSEFTSCgxMCkvKiBJUHY2IFVEUCA0LXR1cGxlICsKKwkJCQkJCQkgICAgKiBleHQgaGRy cyAqLwogCi0jZGVmaW5lCU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfT1BBUVVFCQkyNTUJLyogb3JkZXJpbmcsIG5vdCBh ZmZpbml0eSAqLworI2RlZmluZQlNX0hBU0hUWVBFX09QQVFVRQkJNjMJLyogb3JkZXJpbmcsIG5v dCBhZmZpbml0eSAqLworI2RlZmluZQlNX0hBU0hUWVBFX09QQVFVRV9IQVNICQlNX0hBU0hUWVBF X0hBU0goTV9IQVNIVFlQRV9PUEFRVUUpCisJCQkJCQkvKiBvcmRlcmluZytoYXNoLCBub3QgYWZm aW5pdHkqLwogCiAjZGVmaW5lCU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfQ0xFQVIobSkJKChtKS0+bV9wa3RoZHIucnNz dHlwZSA9IDApCiAjZGVmaW5lCU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfR0VUKG0pCSgobSktPm1fcGt0aGRyLnJzc3R5 cGUpCiAjZGVmaW5lCU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfU0VUKG0sIHYpCSgobSktPm1fcGt0aGRyLnJzc3R5cGUg PSAodikpCiAjZGVmaW5lCU1fSEFTSFRZUEVfVEVTVChtLCB2KQkoTV9IQVNIVFlQRV9HRVQobSkg PT0gKHYpKQorI2RlZmluZQlNX0hBU0hUWVBFX0lTSEFTSChtKQkoTV9IQVNIVFlQRV9HRVQobSkg JiBNX0hBU0hUWVBFX0hBU0hQUk9QKQogCiAvKgogICogQ09TL1FPUyBjbGFzcyBhbmQgcXVhbGl0 eSBvZiBzZXJ2aWNlIHRhZ3MuCgo= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 24 09:43:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F812B489F0 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 09:43:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 200A912E0 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 09:43:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4O9hDRQ033134 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 09:43:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 206932] Realtek 8111 card stops responding under high load in netmap mode Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 09:43:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-CURRENT X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: software-freebsd@interfasys.ch X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 09:43:14 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D206932 --- Comment #4 from Olivier - interfaSys s=C3=A0rl --- Using fresh netmap from FreeBSD 11 and a newer pkt-gen, this is what I see. 986.519903 [2163] netmap_ioctl nr_cmd must be 0 not 12 047.486179 [1481] nm_txsync_prologue fail head < kring->rhead || hea= d > kring->rtail 047.510386 [1511] nm_txsync_prologue re0 TX0 kring error: head 107 c= ur 107 tail 106 rhead 52 rcur 52 rtail 106 hwcur 52 hwtail 106 047.534818 [1612] netmap_ring_reinit called for re0 TX0 051.945718 [1481] nm_txsync_prologue fail head < kring->rhead || hea= d > kring->rtail 051.990215 [1511] nm_txsync_prologue re0 TX0 kring error: head 225 c= ur 225 tail 224 rhead 223 rcur 223 rtail 224 hwcur 223 hwtail 224 052.009143 [1612] netmap_ring_reinit called for re0 TX0 At this point pkt-gen exits with error.=20 I've also tried using the netmap software emulation and it crashes even earlier. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 24 13:45:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068E0B48CC6 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:45:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB1851BC6 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:45:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4ODjl2M044240 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:45:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 13:45:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@grosbein.net X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 13:45:49 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166255 --- Comment #15 from eugen@grosbein.net --- Created attachment 170599 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D170599&action= =3Dedit if.c.diff make it read-only loader tunable --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Tue May 24 13:47:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB94B48DA6 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:47:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F18441D7C for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:47:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4ODl9H8046111 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 13:47:09 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 13:47:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@grosbein.net X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 13:47:10 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166255 --- Comment #16 from eugen@grosbein.net --- (In reply to Hans Petter Selasky from comment #14) I've just attached a patch changing the setting from r/w sysctl to r/o load= er tunable. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed May 25 08:41:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DFCDB49986 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 08:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noname.esst@yahoo.com) Received: from nm25-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm25-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.247]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 598941D4D for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 08:41:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noname.esst@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1464165661; bh=8Y6oqJFjnurWhYolukbkpfp7z2O4K9cFN8Zh/XhLT8Y=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:References:From:Subject; b=TqUPhYapsjWaNTj7qjxFqr3KezXnvzg61Np0TMtqdQSzaNfQFAbfPvDohbrQa3wdGPGPoSTpOHYePmVKk00s/qDDjBI7e4ODpbZf8Ru7nRhcG/+i7kUe2CHHcCdiNQYnBTnZb5WQAbmZeMmTnWBzdoRacxoFpYo/3Gx7LunqDIZnWQFhah2GjaAVbsqZSK1ot+3MMU++NftKLFBhIjx+9gZUOFB+GChiyWJRjnWZSDIYJPNiHsh19rpL+0oh42DNBtU03fjTdSIkwvXZJxUw3TZYLTFGXDmEbRBeEqZpGOV3btoUSob6UfSbaUBI3TyY+LELYMcApGRcoYqWQJM4Rw== Received: from [98.138.100.103] by nm25.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 May 2016 08:41:01 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.163] by tm102.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 May 2016 08:41:01 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1064.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 25 May 2016 08:41:01 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 188549.2099.bm@omp1064.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-YMail-OSG: ZOYlvZkVM1lNQkz75yqXMNXmZJCjgXfEm0OcxHu5IsGmnPjUu.8lkpu_AHpwLeh LmSMLDZKCvYUz9oXp1qjlO8lB5ZMkrI5gC2nj2hvKWiaR3mbXIxPiEaizd3Os.1rj_dyvL56qvaY .M30yuHOs736QHLlVqDblr8pGrjS4kkU4BxWxYMHSTrGtcazNFaP2knl1M4WsvHfQl9ngSFTkTu0 2zh8Q4V2VnbyMXW.LiobWYylP5xCjhvlaLiMVIORyIYFLK8n_U2luyXk4uWnid48z754V896WRat T99W.kG9LSr.w52JFbcedSxjzdO5jQxv3tdd.a.jZcEdf.PUbc1crsMKksntn5640l0zfHaaQbv1 ksfaQ2WjGmtjlHQ8dwNYoqX.b7u7GnyFpS8VHq7KqzSXCoI5vShT8YXcT0tRAvP8pSqb13X45jE0 6LRpE77bWTk4FK8q5iRkDwqiZbyl.aaMUVTe1.E_0HmZQ26tVFfjaB5tHv.NBKnngmYuU36QcaIa kpEqJnAQ5eykHMg-- Received: from jws10014.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sendmailws147.mail.ne1.yahoo.com; Wed, 25 May 2016 08:41:00 +0000; 1464165660.713 Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 08:41:00 +0000 (UTC) From: Nomad Esst Reply-To: Nomad Esst To: FreeBSD Hackers , FreeBSD Net Message-ID: <1807465361.275157.1464165660481.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Looking for a freelancer to do some netgraph stuff MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1807465361.275157.1464165660481.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 08:41:08 -0000 HiI'm looking for some one to help us develop an application based on netgraph (you will be payed). Please let me know if you are interested. Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed May 25 09:00:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C817B489C6 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 09:00:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D0AF1C5A for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 09:00:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4P90do0067047 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 09:00:40 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 09:00:39 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 09:00:40 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166255 --- Comment #17 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: n_hibma Date: Wed May 25 09:00:06 UTC 2016 New revision: 300670 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/300670 Log: Change net.link.log_promisc_mode_change to a read-only tunable PR: 166255 Submitted by: eugen.grosbein.net Obtained from: hselasky MFC after: 3 days Changes: head/sys/net/if.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed May 25 09:07:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90011B48D03 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 09:07:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D21D11DC for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 09:07:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4P97NV7000465 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 09:07:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 09:07:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@grosbein.net X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 09:07:24 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166255 --- Comment #18 from eugen@grosbein.net --- (In reply to commit-hook from comment #17) You have missed TUNABLE_INT line from my patch, don't you? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed May 25 09:19:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63758B48F91 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 09:19:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53E1F173F for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 09:19:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4P9J4NZ097272 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 09:19:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 09:19:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: nick@van-laarhoven.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 09:19:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166255 --- Comment #19 from Nick Hibma --- I did miss it, but it works without it: nick@fimkjecurrent:/usr/home/nick % sysctl net.link.log_promisc_mode_change=3D1 sysctl: oid 'net.link.log_promisc_mode_change' is a read only tunable sysctl: Tunable values are set in /boot/loader.conf nick@fimkjecurrent:/usr/home/nick % sysctl net.link.log_promisc_mode_cha= nge net.link.log_promisc_mode_change: 0 nick@fimkjecurrent:/usr/home/nick % grep promisc /boot/loader.conf net.link.log_promisc_mode_change=3D"0" I checked a few other source files and it's a mixed bag. I'll leave it at t= his. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed May 25 13:24:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91E9B49928 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 13:24:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9A931A9F for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 13:24:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4PDOEUE064693 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 13:24:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 13:24:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: portmaster@bsdforge.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 13:24:14 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166255 Chris Hutchinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |portmaster@bsdforge.com --- Comment #20 from Chris Hutchinson --- Sorry to arrive at the party so late. But IMHO this is *really* an issue better targeted to a (sys)logger facilit= y. No? Wouldn't it be fairly trivial to simply *filter* out unwanted messages, rather than adding yet another KNOB to the kernel? Again. Sorry for showing up so late. But I felt strongly about it. So I felt compelled say something. Thanks for your time. --Chris --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 09:45:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900F0B4991F for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 09:45:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 813011820 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 09:45:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4Q9j4Hc015229 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 09:45:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209758] Broadcom 5717 C not working Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 09:45:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 09:45:04 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209758 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 10:14:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C22B4A569 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:14:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 746521CE4 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:14:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QAErAP018083 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:14:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 10:14:53 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@grosbein.net X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 10:14:53 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166255 --- Comment #21 from eugen@grosbein.net --- (In reply to Chris Hutchinson from comment #20) You are essentially proposing the system to spend CPU time generating tons = of messages, pass them from the kernel to userland daemon using socket subsyst= em and then spend more CPU time to filter them. Instead of just not doing that= all in expense of single extra tunnable. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 10:40:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E514B4AA8E for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:40:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4CC91935 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:40:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QAe7UG070022 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:40:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 10:40:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: nick@van-laarhoven.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 10:40:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166255 --- Comment #22 from Nick Hibma --- Let's not have a discussion here on logging techniques. Both points are val= id. Period. The bug report is effectively closed. I'll get someone to close it. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 10:43:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39CBB4ACAD for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:43:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A42CF1C8F for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:43:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QAhlSt082326 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 10:43:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 10:43:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@grosbein.net X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 10:43:47 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166255 --- Comment #23 from eugen@grosbein.net --- (In reply to Nick Hibma from comment #22) Please close it after MFC. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 11:11:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A0DB4B67F for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 11:11:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61BDE1011 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 11:11:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QBBcwh088585 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 11:11:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209758] Broadcom 5717 C not working Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 11:11:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: giulianosperandio@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 11:11:38 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209758 --- Comment #2 from Giuliano --- Created attachment 170672 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D170672&action= =3Dedit pciconf output --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 11:16:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22984B4B8E2 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 11:16:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 138571685 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 11:16:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QBG4vo096794 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 11:16:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209758] Broadcom 5717 C not working Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 11:16:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: giulianosperandio@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 11:16:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209758 --- Comment #3 from Giuliano --- (In reply to Ngie Cooper from comment #1) Dear Ngie Cooper, I have attached the output pciconf at file pciconf.out.txt. DragonFlyBSD has also a if_bge driver. I cannot understand the difference between if_bge and if_bnx, they seem to be quite similar. https://www.dragonflybsd.org/cgi/web-man?command=3Dif_bge§ion=3DANY(In = reply to Ngie Cooper from comment #1) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 13:15:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BCCB4B650 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 13:15:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFEB013AC for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 13:15:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QDF4BS076321 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 13:15:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209758] Broadcom 5717 C not working Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 13:15:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: giulianosperandio@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 13:15:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209758 --- Comment #4 from Giuliano --- Actually, I have tried first to install FreeNAS 9.10. As the system doesn't works, I started to look for why it is not working. As I could retrieve, the source code of DragonFly BSD includes the 5717 C N= IC at if_bnx. The FreeBSD if_bge source code includes only 5717 A and 5717 B N= ICs. The 'C' version is missing. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 13:26:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAD3B4BB0A for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 13:26:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E1A71156 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 13:26:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QDQarf000813 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 13:26:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 13:26:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: portmaster@bsdforge.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 13:26:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166255 --- Comment #24 from Chris Hutchinson --- (In reply to eugen from comment #21) > (In reply to Chris Hutchinson from comment #20) >=20 > You are essentially proposing the system to spend CPU time generating tons > of messages, pass them from the kernel to userland daemon using socket > subsystem and then spend more CPU time to filter them. Instead of just not > doing that all in expense of single extra tunnable. I'd just like to go on record as indicating that this is a security related issue, and one would *want* to know about it. In the rare case that this is *not* true. syslog(3) should be asked to deal with it. Has secteam@ weighed in on this? But given this bug has been closed, those of us whom are opposed to this change, will simply need to add a local patch to reverse it. Thank you for your indulgence. --Chris --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 14:00:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7DA9B4B4C7 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 14:00:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A87071769 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 14:00:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QE0WAM081568 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 14:00:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 14:00:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@grosbein.net X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 14:00:33 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166255 --- Comment #25 from eugen@grosbein.net --- Default system behaviour is not changed. Reboot is required to disable logg= ing after a change to loader.conf. So, no patching should be required to stay s= afe. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 14:26:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B54EB4BD4A for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 14:26:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C58B1057 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 14:26:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QEQA6Z070782 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 14:26:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209758] Broadcom 5717 C not working Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 14:26:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: sepherosa@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 14:26:11 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209758 Sepherosa Ziehau changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sepherosa@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Sepherosa Ziehau --- Created attachment 170681 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D170681&action= =3Dedit 5717C patch --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 14:26:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70371B4BDE0 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 14:26:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 615EB1112 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 14:26:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QEQhIX071558 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 14:26:43 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209758] Broadcom 5717 C not working Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 14:26:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: sepherosa@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 14:26:43 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209758 --- Comment #6 from Sepherosa Ziehau --- Heh, it was added a long time ago. And as for why bnx(4) in DragonflyBSD, its mainly because the bnx(4) suppor= t 4 RX rings on all chips, and 4 TX rings on 5717C/5719/5720, and well of course multi-vector MSI-X support. Adding these stuffs to bge(4) caused too much trouble for me back to 2013, bge(4) is already too complex. I have attached the patch for FreeBSD bge(4) to take over 5717C, please tes= t. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 14:40:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48736B4B355 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 14:40:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3899B1D8E for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 14:40:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QEehuD000725 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 14:40:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 14:40:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: portmaster@bsdforge.com X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 14:40:44 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166255 --- Comment #26 from Chris Hutchinson --- (In reply to eugen from comment #25) > Default system behaviour is not changed. Reboot is required to disable > logging after a change to loader.conf. So, no patching should be required= to > stay safe. I understand that. I also agree with you that syslog(3) is not an ideal option, either. But as it stands, this new "switch" is still a security risk -- it opens a potential "backdoor", however unlikely some feel it might be. I'm just not sure that the need, outweighs the risk. Is there /really/ no other possible solution. Must a decision on this be made right now? Or could more time be given, in hopes a better solution might be found? Lastly, I know status of this bug is essentially "closed", and I apologize for responding so late. I would have responded earlier. But I was sure a patch in this direction, would have been rejected. --Chris --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 15:10:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5F6B4BD13 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 15:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEED112F8 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 15:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QFAUa8093922 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 15:10:30 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 15:10:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: eugen@grosbein.net X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 15:10:31 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166255 --- Comment #27 from eugen@grosbein.net --- (In reply to Chris Hutchinson from comment #26) > Must a decision on this be made right now? Or could more time be given, in hopes a better solution might be found? The problem report's presented 2012-03-19 (with the patch), how many more y= ears it should take? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 15:12:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFCDB4BEBC for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 15:12:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2CD81795 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 15:12:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QFC6Hw050302 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 15:12:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 15:12:07 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 8.3-PRERELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: nick@van-laarhoven.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 15:12:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166255 --- Comment #28 from Nick Hibma --- Guys, please stop discussing this topic in a bug report. Take it to freebsd-net@, freebsd-security@, freebsd-current@, etc. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 16:07:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97501B4BFB0 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 16:07:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from hz.grosbein.net (hz.grosbein.net [78.47.246.247]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "hz.grosbein.net", Issuer "hz.grosbein.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 163EF1CF6 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 16:07:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Received: from eg.sd.rdtc.ru (root@eg.sd.rdtc.ru [62.231.161.221]) by hz.grosbein.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u4QG6fPS062380 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 26 May 2016 18:06:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) X-Envelope-From: eugen@grosbein.net X-Envelope-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from [10.58.0.10] (dadv@dadvw [10.58.0.10]) by eg.sd.rdtc.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u4QG6VXY060495 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 26 May 2016 23:06:32 +0700 (KRAT) (envelope-from eugen@grosbein.net) Subject: Re: [Bug 166255] [net] [patch] It should be possible to disable "promiscuous mode enabled" messages To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: Cc: Chris Hutchinson From: Eugene Grosbein Message-ID: <57471F08.1080908@grosbein.net> Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 23:06:32 +0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q, LOCAL_FROM autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Report: * 0.0 DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_Q Date: is 4 days to 4 months after Received: date * -2.3 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 2.6 LOCAL_FROM From my domains X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on hz.grosbein.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 16:07:08 -0000 Moving this to net@ per request. > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166255 > > --- Comment #26 from Chris Hutchinson --- > (In reply to eugen from comment #25) >> Default system behaviour is not changed. Reboot is required to disable >> logging after a change to loader.conf. So, no patching should be required to >> stay safe. > > I understand that. I also agree with you that syslog(3) is not an > ideal option, either. But as it stands, this new "switch" is still > a security risk -- it opens a potential "backdoor", however unlikely > some feel it might be. I'm just not sure that the need, outweighs > the risk. Is there /really/ no other possible solution. Must a > decision on this be made right now? Or could more time be given, > in hopes a better solution might be found? > > Lastly, I know status of this bug is essentially "closed", > and I apologize for responding so late. I would have responded > earlier. But I was sure a patch in this direction, would have > been rejected. The PR and patch make it possible to not log "promisc. mode changed" messages. In short, you insist that in should NOT be possible to disable those logs in any way, right? Eugene Grosbein From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 17:13:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0096CB4A568 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 17:13:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from webmail2.jnielsen.NET (webmail2.jnielsen.net [50.114.224.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "webmail2.jnielsen.net", Issuer "freebsdsolutions.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB19F1D54 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 17:13:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from jnielse-ml.domo.com (50-207-241-62-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.207.241.62]) (authenticated bits=0) by webmail2.jnielsen.NET (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u4QHDRjK070604 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 26 May 2016 11:13:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) X-Authentication-Warning: webmail2.jnielsen.NET: Host 50-207-241-62-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.207.241.62] claimed to be jnielse-ml.domo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: Bridge interface and ARP traffic From: John Nielsen In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 11:13:28 -0600 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9746AF3A-3440-4277-9D25-E78B04A35A6D@jnielsen.net> References: To: Aqz X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 17:13:41 -0000 > On May 20, 2016, at 12:30 AM, Aqz wrote: >=20 > Hello, >=20 > I have a very strange issue with passing ARP traffic through bridge > interface. > I'm using FreeBSD 10.3-REL VMWare virtual machine as bridge between = two > networks using the same IP address space. Bridge interface doesn't = have IP > address assigned so it acts more like a switch between those two = virtual > networks - let's call them NET and PUB. > Gateway for our network is in NET vlan, all the virtual machines are = in the > PUB vlan. >=20 > Traffic passes through this bridge, but there are few problems. >=20 > I have to manually add static ARP table entries for gateway on all the > machines in PUB network - I can see ARP broadcasts from machines = asking > where's the gateway, and the reply but only on one of bridged = interfaces - > the one from NET side. The response is not visible on bridge = interface, nor > the PUB vlan interface. >=20 > Also, when I try to ping a machine that's in NET network from PUB = network > all network traffic suddenly stops, even when I'm pinging some = nonexistent > host. I have to use virtual console and ping for ex. DNS server, or = any > internet host to make traffic start again. >=20 > I'm not sure what I'm doing wrong - I've been using a similar = configuration > before (with physical machines). >=20 > Here's my ifconfig output http://aquaz.eu/bridgeifconfig.txt The first thing to check is the hypervisor. Do you have your VM = configured to allow the NICs to use promiscuous mode? Is there any kind = of IP/MAC matching or filtering going on? Next thing to check is firewall in the VM. Is IPFW or PF enabled? What = is the output of "sysctl net.link.bridge" ? The ping problems are definitely weird, not sure what to think about = that. JN= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 17:24:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05568B4A807 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 17:24:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9EAD1247 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 17:24:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QHOipE044662 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 17:24:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 17:24:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash, needs-qa, vimage X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: bz@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable10? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 17:24:45 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D201694 --- Comment #17 from Bjoern A. Zeeb --- Just to confirm: this is believed to a problem with pf only at this point, right? Is it also still true, that this only happens with pf compiled in but not if loaded as a module? I have various other problems with pf an VNETs in HEAD to address. I am not surprised. Is there any chance you could test changes on non-10.2 in the future? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 17:30:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84809B4A9E1 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 17:30:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: from reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (reviews.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:607c::16:b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F59C147D for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 17:30:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from daemon-user@freebsd.org) Received: by reviews.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1346) id B45A89AD6; Thu, 26 May 2016 17:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 17:30:31 +0000 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org From: "bz (Bjoern A. Zeeb)" Reply-to: D1944+325+8925873bdc96dfc2@reviews.freebsd.org Subject: [Differential] D1944: PF and VIMAGE fixes Message-ID: <98bb81bca4c28fa92540462b27f2444c@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: , Thread-Topic: D1944: PF and VIMAGE fixes X-Herald-Rules: none X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-To: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: X-Phabricator-Cc: Precedence: bulk In-Reply-To: References: Thread-Index: NDc2NzM0MzY4OTdiYThiNTU1MjY2ZDZmMTJiIFdHMrc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 17:30:32 -0000 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 18:19:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93547B4B8B6 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 18:19:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83C3714C8 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 18:19:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QIIxCx062089 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 18:19:00 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 201694] 10.2-BETA2 crashing when killing VIMAGE/VNET jails Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 18:19:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.2-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: crash, needs-qa, vimage X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: freebsd@otoh.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable10? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 18:19:00 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D201694 --- Comment #18 from Paul Armstrong --- As far as I know, this is only a PF (well, more specifically, ALTQ) problem= (I haven't tested the others extensively). Last I checked, compiling PF in directly was a non-starter. PF must be a module and ALTQ must be compiled in (maybe that's the problem.= ..). I'm happy to test changes. Just point me at a patchset and let me know the version it's to be applied against (or if it's post checking, let me know w= hich version of CURRENT it's in). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 19:36:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860B9B4B104; Thu, 26 May 2016 19:36:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: from box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (box-fra-01.niklaas.eu [46.165.253.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9731516; Thu, 26 May 2016 19:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: by box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4682161FEC; Thu, 26 May 2016 21:36:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 21:36:02 +0200 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff To: tinc@tinc-vpn.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD Message-ID: <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> Mail-Followup-To: tinc@tinc-vpn.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oFbHfjnMgUMsrGjO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160519124446.GB2444@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160523034855.GA37797@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160524061707.GA77980@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 19:36:10 -0000 --oFbHfjnMgUMsrGjO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I was eventually able to solve this issue. I asked for help on several mailing lists. So, for reference, here are links to the relevant threads: https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2016-May/271810.html https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2016-May/045349.html https://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/2016-May/004573.html Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff [2016-05-24 08:17 +0200] : > I want to serve IPv4 subnets 10.1.0.0/16 (machine A) and 10.2.0.0/16 > (machine B), and IPv6 subnets fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1::/96 (machine A) and > fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2::/96 (machine B) respectively. The jails are > connected on lo1. Here lies the first problem. It seems that it's not legitimate to assign /96 subnets when using unique local addresses (ULAs). I was right getting some /48 subnet for my local IPv6 network; some easy way to get one generated randomly is http://unique-local-ipv6.com/ . But instead of assigning /96 subnets to each host, you must assign /64 subnets. I guess (but I am not sure because I have not found any reference that mentions this explicitly) you *must not* use any other subnet when dealing with ULAs. So I decided for the following two subnets for machine A and B respectively: fd16:dcc0:f4cc:1::/64 and fd16:dcc0:f4cc:2::/64. > The following is the tinc-up script on each machine that assignes IP > addresses and creates routes. I commented out some variations that > I tried but haven't had success with either: >=20 > A $ cat /usr/local/etc/tinc/klaas/tinc-up > ifconfig $INTERFACE inet6 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 prefixlen 80 > route -6 add -host fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2:0:1 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 > route -6 add -net fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2::/96 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 > #route -6 add -ifp $INTERFACE -host fd16:dcc0:f4cc::2:0:1 fd16:dcc= 0:f4cc::1:0:1 > #route -6 add -ifp $INTERFACE -net fd16:dcc0:f4cc::2:0:0/96 fd16:dcc= 0:f4cc::1:0:1 >=20 > ifconfig $INTERFACE 10.1.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 > route -4 add -host 10.2.0.1 10.1.0.1 > route -4 add -net 10.2.0.0/16 10.1.0.1 In addition, it seems not sufficient to solely assign IP address, but you must also assign a route for the respective foreign (!) subnet(s) to the tap interface. Without these I couldn't get the connection working. Thus, you get the following tinc-up scripts for both machines: A $ cat /usr/local/etc/tinc/tinc-up ifconfig $INTERFACE inet6 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:1::1 prefixlen 48 alias ifconfig $INTERFACE 10.1.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 alias route add -inet6 -net fd16:dcc0:f4cc:2::/64 -interface $INTERFACE B $ cat /usr/local/etc/tinc/tinc-up ifconfig $INTERFACE inet6 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:2::1 prefixlen 48 alias ifconfig $INTERFACE 10.2.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 alias route add -inet6 -net fd16:dcc0:f4cc:1::/64 -interface $INTERFACE The following you should include into tinc-down to clean up the route when the daemon is shut down (alter this for machine B respectively): route add -inet6 -net fd16:dcc0:f4cc:1::/64 -interface $INTERFACE To make this complete, these are the relevant host configurations for tinc: A $ cat /usr/local/etc/tinc/hosts/A Address =3D A Subnet =3D fd16:dcc0:f4cc:1::/64 Subnet =3D 10.1.0.0/16 -----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY----- -----END RSA PUBLIC KEY----- A $ cat /usr/local/etc/tinc/hosts/B Address =3D B Subnet =3D fd16:dcc0:f4cc:2::/64 Subnet =3D 10.2.0.0/16 -----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY----- -----END RSA PUBLIC KEY----- For reference -- in hope that duckduckgo does a good job indexing this and prevents others from struggling the same way as I did -- here are the errors I would get from tinc if either the subnet was not set up correctly (see above) or if I had not configured the routes: Cannot route packet: neighbor solicitation request for unknown address = fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 In hope that nobody else has to struggle with this as long as I did. Niklaas --oFbHfjnMgUMsrGjO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXR1AZAAoJEG2fODeJrIU/5OkP/0RJ4PrCLOaN6zxNqnziSkIE mUqwhR1Nql3o6+amn1/EsJ7cT2XBulvWV5Xmk3QmRsa1L5+xSx0AqMX7zNRJOOh2 0Ypjg2OE7E7jgJ+Tu6uiwMOlw8x0QM+m3jzYSUkTsyNWydyjzmXDCB//T8QVhMQZ sI5zpHDW+ehfu1Cl+4pEyD+/FfJ/sOGHmzkkHF4iO30vEeHuqZ8Y28v/enKvuYvJ u0XWjAk8DLIe0aKsEPJLRyrPKLVwj6H/E2N5AE0upxMMhv29XJfX0Gu7V9n0YYIX zDDdsKMiogyzlj/R3FV3dl5A6uljeO77Zb+oNhoA10MijCMEiUqUMdZgShZ4wlNp s1Ko7OdAQzj3lP1pZ9eHzqisXIZawAEf1qrKRLcpse/kPmbLCA9zL2vRjuzeWvtT dQwOMTgF7gkqgQbexL6MUruSL7p3yRLtexlF9LJLEoELtjQ0NAP8loSSj9J9Bzgo Hhk2PX9i2iQWFGojbhyqB+hgdVjG+Sv2ufP9YTHy/ilbIK4+5RohUxs7TKfNiq3G 7+WMuhZMzezUfbVwisUarIrji+8h4+bkTxEI/secCAQ6fb73eRHeATQYEj/c4/ol PlE0r9tAzV89NZeIvrJ35qlT76ojxtXggOr5THB6T2mLulxEg70moGVIXv748jRD pUoh/xttHM/L+RkNeUWb =UQWs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oFbHfjnMgUMsrGjO-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 20:26:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C10FB4BD6F for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 20:26:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D34C11A0 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 20:26:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QKQSmo041946 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 20:26:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209758] Broadcom 5717 C not working Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 20:26:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: giulianosperandio@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 20:26:28 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209758 --- Comment #7 from Giuliano --- Dear Sepherosa, I wish to thank you very much for your help. I'm sorry my ignorance but I h= ave looked for how to compile this patch and I did not found. Is it possible to return the necessary commands to do this? (or a link with instructions) Best regards, Giuliano --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 20:32:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B8DB4B14E for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 20:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4F7718B6 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 20:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QKWbvm064446 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 20:32:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209758] Broadcom 5717 C not working Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 20:32:37 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: ngie@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 20:32:37 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209758 --- Comment #8 from Ngie Cooper --- (In reply to Giuliano from comment #7) cd /usr/src fetch -o - https://bz-attachments.freebsd.org/attachment.cgi?id=3D170681 | = patch -p1 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 20:52:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E39B4B681 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 20:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47FE513A8 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 20:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QKqqqH016091 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 20:52:52 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209758] Broadcom 5717 C not working Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 20:52:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: giulianosperandio@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 20:52:52 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209758 --- Comment #9 from Giuliano --- Dear Ngie, I have triple checked typing to be sure it is not my mistake. There is a er= ror: fetch: No match. Hmm... I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere. Best regards, Giuliano --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Thu May 26 21:22:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5522FB4BE83 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 21:22:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 466ED1772 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 21:22:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4QLMfms081556 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 21:22:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209758] Broadcom 5717 C not working Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 21:22:41 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: ngie@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 21:22:42 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209758 --- Comment #10 from Ngie Cooper --- (In reply to Giuliano from comment #9) The command I provided is for use with FreeBSD. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 00:19:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E3FB4B798 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:19:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2ED11B83 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:19:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4R0Jc53039351 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:19:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209471] Listen queue overflow due to too many sockets stuck in CLOSED state Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 00:19:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: rblayzor@inoc.net X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 00:19:39 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209471 --- Comment #21 from Robert Blayzor --- This finally showed it's head again... sonewconn: pcb 0xfffff80001b2bc40: Listen queue overflow: 301 already in qu= eue awaiting acceptance (25 occurrences) sonewconn: pcb 0xfffff80001b2bc40: Listen queue overflow: 301 already in qu= eue awaiting acceptance (28 occurrences) sonewconn: pcb 0xfffff80001b2bc40: Listen queue overflow: 301 already in qu= eue awaiting acceptance (25 occurrences) ... netstat -an | grep CLOSED | wc -l 301 procstat -ta 726 100087 dovecot - 1 120 sleep kqread 61961 100200 dovecot - 3 120 sleep vmf_de The process is dovecot... and when I see this happen, the state is stuck in "vmf_de" which is from the patch in Bug 204426 tcpdrop -l -a | tail tcpdrop 2607:f058:110:2::1:1 4190 2607:f058:110:2::f:0 49170 tcpdrop 2607:f058:110:2::1:1 4190 2607:f058:110:2::f:1 55998 tcpdrop 2607:f058:110:2::1:1 4190 2607:f058:110:2::f:0 47559 tcpdrop 2607:f058:110:2::1:1 4190 2607:f058:110:2::f:1 36319 tcpdrop 2607:f058:110:2::1:1 4190 2607:f058:110:2::f:0 47496 tcpdrop 2607:f058:110:2::1:1 4190 2607:f058:110:2::f:1 46326 tcpdrop 2607:f058:110:2::1:1 4190 2607:f058:110:2::f:0 36871 tcpdrop 2607:f058:110:2::1:1 4190 2607:f058:110:2::f:1 24142 tcpdrop 2607:f058:110:2::1:1 4190 2607:f058:110:2::f:0 7962 tcpdrop 2607:f058:110:2::1:1 4190 2607:f058:110:2::f:1 13402 [~] sudo tcpdrop 2607:f058:110:2::1:1 4190 2607:f058:110:2::f:0 7962 tcpdrop: 2607:f058:110:2::1:1 4190 2607:f058:110:2::f:0 7962: No such proce= ss [~] sudo tcpdrop 2607:f058:110:2::1:1 4190 2607:f058:110:2::f:1 13402 tcpdrop: 2607:f058:110:2::1:1 4190 2607:f058:110:2::f:1 13402: No such proc= ess --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 04:11:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181BAB4CB39; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:11:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x236.google.com (mail-it0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA58E110E; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:11:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x236.google.com with SMTP id l63so66169657ita.1; Thu, 26 May 2016 21:11:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to; bh=MMnVUoWs3jKpkw5MD8Ojk20DzQUjpDNRfiK5jIuUJ94=; b=ER8XfIkaLddC3ONLJB+Bgep5LHlhm7i8t5llz3ZrIW2dd08mjNuQK26Dkz/YL2B2sG zhpJtAABNTIXBOg6XoR6caCzgpEDxkGb0bxrb4Mrbqwlo3VDeuo+mkTvup9Ejjc+UaRC iJ543X6rYFLsbDYcbfAxbQnq6wYE/F7B2u1NfE+f/3LZ6DzHvecxj5kLHx5xnfoPqElz EZEWfYqzvCU2mUdxgDhxtEZGNVh2Aae2fJ4FnzaMbuOAyxf8/utbs5V3F8IChxPjMMrQ 9wRPAhJekT6tCCUgV0A6QaFgDQ9o1Ob+FFiJoOTxn8atD9JrapVz3cxRfXkrkjVnCoZl E5Zg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=MMnVUoWs3jKpkw5MD8Ojk20DzQUjpDNRfiK5jIuUJ94=; b=SCwR5BK8p4X7KtTa67SY2smDuX21Wkq0bEvrul1cjsXegyIViT28/8GUUTbmu3Q8YK mkYckSucRqCflZW434/zxS7rtoS6S3cFu8zfhqzWstCq6f/f4X3r3xElmySunfG6LEeR 62AHntQcpD0tzW+J08MnFrNrWlFuZ3VeF31DjHEewTOaJzP/feEh9R+q6KwI53UsjBtz DRdfAJTE1Y2gjVPy/BZyyNiUjy9373bJ96OcT0zY/dVRC8LYJrByOGiyC5p41w9c2x72 UTffCyFCHv1Spk/aHN1XvNCPq0NsZSB3mJPucFojsqEO2JxX5lf7IqORrhS09Wr9zNY/ JqPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIz+Tv1tsZcTCt0Eq8PBFVdF3MKadvZZHjpwPktPZ06FGAZSn724TDUXdCIs83z2pN2duqN13wvq7rzeg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.36.64.14 with SMTP id n14mr5868120ita.53.1464322311801; Thu, 26 May 2016 21:11:51 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.20.70 with HTTP; Thu, 26 May 2016 21:11:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> References: <20160519124446.GB2444@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160523034855.GA37797@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160524061707.GA77980@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 21:11:51 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wkgzkCxX1DBRthV7v-RSAXk5tag Message-ID: Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD From: Kevin Oberman To: tinc@tinc-vpn.org, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , Mailinglists FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 04:11:53 -0000 On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff < stdin@niklaas.eu> wrote: > I was eventually able to solve this issue. I asked for help on several > mailing lists. So, for reference, here are links to the relevant > threads: > > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2016-May/271810.html > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2016-May/045349.html > https://www.tinc-vpn.org/pipermail/tinc/2016-May/004573.html > > Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff [2016-05-24 08:17 +0200] : > > > I want to serve IPv4 subnets 10.1.0.0/16 (machine A) and 10.2.0.0/16 > > (machine B), and IPv6 subnets fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1::/96 (machine A) and > > fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2::/96 (machine B) respectively. The jails are > > connected on lo1. > > Here lies the first problem. It seems that it's not legitimate to assign > /96 subnets when using unique local addresses (ULAs). I was right > getting some /48 subnet for my local IPv6 network; some easy way to get > one generated randomly is http://unique-local-ipv6.com/ . But instead of > assigning /96 subnets to each host, you must assign /64 subnets. I guess > (but I am not sure because I have not found any reference that mentions > this explicitly) you *must not* use any other subnet when dealing with > ULAs. > > So I decided for the following two subnets for machine A and > B respectively: fd16:dcc0:f4cc:1::/64 and fd16:dcc0:f4cc:2::/64. > > > The following is the tinc-up script on each machine that assignes IP > > addresses and creates routes. I commented out some variations that > > I tried but haven't had success with either: > > > > A $ cat /usr/local/etc/tinc/klaas/tinc-up > > ifconfig $INTERFACE inet6 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 prefixlen 80 > > route -6 add -host fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2:0:1 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 > > route -6 add -net fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:2::/96 > fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 > > #route -6 add -ifp $INTERFACE -host fd16:dcc0:f4cc::2:0:1 > fd16:dcc0:f4cc::1:0:1 > > #route -6 add -ifp $INTERFACE -net fd16:dcc0:f4cc::2:0:0/96 > fd16:dcc0:f4cc::1:0:1 > > > > ifconfig $INTERFACE 10.1.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 > > route -4 add -host 10.2.0.1 10.1.0.1 > > route -4 add -net 10.2.0.0/16 10.1.0.1 > > In addition, it seems not sufficient to solely assign IP address, but > you must also assign a route for the respective foreign (!) subnet(s) to > the tap interface. Without these I couldn't get the connection working. > Thus, you get the following tinc-up scripts for both machines: > > A $ cat /usr/local/etc/tinc/tinc-up > ifconfig $INTERFACE inet6 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:1::1 prefixlen 48 alias > ifconfig $INTERFACE 10.1.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 alias > > route add -inet6 -net fd16:dcc0:f4cc:2::/64 -interface $INTERFACE > > > B $ cat /usr/local/etc/tinc/tinc-up > ifconfig $INTERFACE inet6 fd16:dcc0:f4cc:2::1 prefixlen 48 alias > ifconfig $INTERFACE 10.2.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0 alias > > route add -inet6 -net fd16:dcc0:f4cc:1::/64 -interface $INTERFACE > > The following you should include into tinc-down to clean up the route > when the daemon is shut down (alter this for machine B respectively): > > route add -inet6 -net fd16:dcc0:f4cc:1::/64 -interface $INTERFACE > > To make this complete, these are the relevant host configurations for > tinc: > > A $ cat /usr/local/etc/tinc/hosts/A > Address = A > Subnet = fd16:dcc0:f4cc:1::/64 > Subnet = 10.1.0.0/16 > > -----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY----- > > -----END RSA PUBLIC KEY----- > > > A $ cat /usr/local/etc/tinc/hosts/B > Address = B > Subnet = fd16:dcc0:f4cc:2::/64 > Subnet = 10.2.0.0/16 > > -----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY----- > > -----END RSA PUBLIC KEY----- > > For reference -- in hope that duckduckgo does a good job indexing this > and prevents others from struggling the same way as I did -- here are > the errors I would get from tinc if either the subnet was not set up > correctly (see above) or if I had not configured the routes: > > Cannot route packet: neighbor solicitation request for unknown address > fd16:dcc0:f4cc:0:0:1:0:1 > > In hope that nobody else has to struggle with this as long as I did. > > Niklaas > There are a lot of excellent reasons to avoid ULAs. There are a very few good, or even so-so reasons to use them. The most commonly cited reason is security which is almost always wrong. In almost 20 years of working with IPv6 I have yet to see any valid security reason for using ULAs. There are any number of excellent papers on this. The most valid use is when you can only get a /64 from your provider. RFCs recommend a minimum assignment to residential customers of a /56 but many providers seem to have missed this, so there is no choice. prefixes longer than /64 are effectively not possible. IPv6 does not care, but the supporting protocols , make a /64 or shorter assumption. More intractable is that hardware also often make similar assumptions. As you learned, you really, really don't waste your time trying to make it work. I really guess all of this needs to be in the handbook so people don't waste time trying to do things that are documented to either not work or not work effectively. And, unless you are really, really sure you need ULAs, They mostly just break things. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 04:52:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81641B46544 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:52:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmarquess@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x235.google.com (mail-it0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56799147E for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:52:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmarquess@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x235.google.com with SMTP id l63so66550089ita.1 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 21:52:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=EFgJJvXSUKCLiX+88jaAFX6OWsMolRadSyW3vTK+eN4=; b=YqvyzoeVvCZJbEI98gSO9eEPLY49c5Eo6/EJM4VDtS824H7pLAYO9D3D55wYTrlnhP klxil40jW37asNy9Xmv6tqPSVc0bMs33d1glXbhKcMyYflS2yy1DZgXalo/+SG1KHLHm CvL/F8ELo56BOiiNkNPUNDnzACTUyMGPxCeg0xRHvqGQzX2gkdKyuYlnWbgXiYyKa5Wj XSBmM1NLkdBc9MO/dbAiGNTL8XoxGvzkfccqYSApvKIBZJP4cqgS20X0Q6j/vZgMORtp 99Ko+IVdkJ3SJ8/D80WmhHJm3aXw17MKQxj5Cu7neoFgi9PX47DnvyHdtIqI4mQn45vN HWOg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=EFgJJvXSUKCLiX+88jaAFX6OWsMolRadSyW3vTK+eN4=; b=GWO+vnzrhYgzmRTdwZ2AbmxzSDOYa8RAxlGRuhTa4LK/DGLsfkllybpphFzBfmz0Bw ciAUULHERBsWsFb3T1I6ubA2wg1446ubxofbmaCrLIBWJBKVm1mKXs7Ly82xh35HKXQJ s5uJMzx3PvOHr4NnscCO+T8nXUPyjhpjFC5iV5Y+sgwMXnSphnG24AFzFlE0kJJpHy5N O/Y2yEoZ/7B6SRcF4fS6PmGqHt2zkJf4O3jHhjSPjJFphyTsD9Bjp8TYPTYsvvhWi6p1 1ZYjmAa0SaWuJ2o419AUwN09eaBnPvkOHPlQ71SdfvUpGe9XI0aH4z/ceucQdQWzjjV/ ghmQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIQV+JxQM1xEkAxENa2l39RTRDeF64+Eck9ajIrbaVK67HeHVCryWdITq1ZZtsWSgpN5qIt6JYAsbR3EA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.36.65.168 with SMTP id b40mr6530292itd.10.1464324765643; Thu, 26 May 2016 21:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.148.69 with HTTP; Thu, 26 May 2016 21:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 23:52:45 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Changing MTU on cxgbe From: Dustin Marquess To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 04:52:46 -0000 After my many issues with ixgbe & ixv, I ended up removing the Intel X520s with Chelsio T420-CR and the Intel X710s with Chelsio T520-CR. So far so good, except I can't seem to change the MTU away from 1500. In fact, ifconfig can't seem to change the mtu at all. On -CURRENT as of yesterday: # ifconfig -m cxgbe0 cxgbe0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=ec07bb capabilities=ecc7bb ether 00:07:43:11:2b:80 nd6 options=29 media: Ethernet 10Gbase-Twinax status: active supported media: media 10Gbase-Twinax mediaopt full-duplex # ifconfig cxgbe0 mtu 9000 ifconfig: ioctl SIOCSIFMTU (set mtu): Invalid argument # ifconfig cxgbe0 mtu 1500 ifconfig: ioctl SIOCSIFMTU (set mtu): Invalid argument Any ideas? Also, the Chelsios don't seem to use iovctl to do SR-IOV like the Intels did (I'm using bhyve). I assume that's what the hw.cxgbe.num_vis loader setting is for? Thanks! -Dustin From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 04:57:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0823EB465C2 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:57:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu) Received: from hergotha.csail.mit.edu (wollman-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:ccb::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B328816BA for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 04:57:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu) Received: from hergotha.csail.mit.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hergotha.csail.mit.edu (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id u4R4vYiZ018912; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:57:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman@hergotha.csail.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by hergotha.csail.mit.edu (8.14.9/8.14.4/Submit) id u4R4vYqu018911; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:57:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 00:57:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <201605270457.u4R4vYqu018911@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> To: dmarquess@gmail.com Subject: Re: Changing MTU on cxgbe References: Organization: none Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (hergotha.csail.mit.edu [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 27 May 2016 00:57:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on hergotha.csail.mit.edu X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 04:57:37 -0000 In article you write: ># ifconfig -m cxgbe0 >cxgbe0: flags=8943 ># ifconfig cxgbe0 mtu 9000 >ifconfig: ioctl SIOCSIFMTU (set mtu): Invalid argument I believe this device, like many others, does not allow the MTU (or actually the MRU) to be changed once the receive ring has been set up You may be able to do it if you down the interface first, or you may have to do it at boot time before anything else (and in particular before the interface is marked "up" for the first time). -GAWollman From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 05:53:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8269BB4C1E8; Fri, 27 May 2016 05:53:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark.tinka@seacom.mu) Received: from the-host.seacom.mu (ge-1.ln-01-jnb.za.seacomnet.com [105.28.96.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 227621F38; Fri, 27 May 2016 05:53:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark.tinka@seacom.mu) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=Mark-Tinkas-MacBook.local) by the-host.seacom.mu with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id O7TN0T-0003O3-OG; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:53:17 +0200 Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD To: tinc@tinc-vpn.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> From: Mark Tinka Message-ID: <016845dd-2c42-5aeb-f65d-02a6fb77acec@seacom.mu> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 07:53:17 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="295T7DuFa0DalPJ4oRE949Xjwnnfl9GUm" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 05:53:30 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --295T7DuFa0DalPJ4oRE949Xjwnnfl9GUm Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="W06wNlo2SC21CdDLEvFtBrMShbn6MqeRA" From: Mark Tinka To: tinc@tinc-vpn.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <016845dd-2c42-5aeb-f65d-02a6fb77acec@seacom.mu> Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD References: <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> In-Reply-To: <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> --W06wNlo2SC21CdDLEvFtBrMShbn6MqeRA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 26/May/16 21:36, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: > Here lies the first problem. It seems that it's not legitimate to assig= n > /96 subnets when using unique local addresses (ULAs). I was right > getting some /48 subnet for my local IPv6 network; some easy way to get= > one generated randomly is http://unique-local-ipv6.com/ . But instead o= f > assigning /96 subnets to each host, you must assign /64 subnets. I gues= s > (but I am not sure because I have not found any reference that mentions= > this explicitly) you *must not* use any other subnet when dealing with > ULAs. > > So I decided for the following two subnets for machine A and > B respectively: fd16:dcc0:f4cc:1::/64 and fd16:dcc0:f4cc:2::/64. Interesting, I did not know that. I know that if you want SLAAC to work, you need to assign a /64 prefix. We use /112's for hosts but based on GUA's, and that works fine. Mark. --W06wNlo2SC21CdDLEvFtBrMShbn6MqeRA-- --295T7DuFa0DalPJ4oRE949Xjwnnfl9GUm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXR+DNAAoJEGcZuYTeKm+GKBYP/0+5uKcj4znpwEJ441oT6xDN OUlP2+L8jthDU6R1J4OYXHeoHl9OtpyZVHodwn1mqeqxvo5saOtXcbYqsRGGKWQS rEF0RPw97ZJW2MmjR+wp7Pv+xiUarlOcg9WouO6QcbsZJm4hcdpD7hOTG5VHYYvv 3E6rnB1DbkQbJoB6p1ESyFDBhFjambZP2jZIVRjHabYRMmrRoiBjEAKfywt3Rv24 R5YTB0Z3FG0rZNSy+iAoeAaUTsS54Z2lvmcXCJQqKWBEmiWG8wV2kDynWf6bXDZ1 eVc81fAGYH5EHwxMDFmGg2fjdmdv7d8Cr9PciigxgMSQhPs1BUN/zMKW32+sGTnH Y6pzdWmjeca67uqeoS3ekmxQZgu/hX65+sqkQ2JQyL2M7dmrYwlcJDOHMTyHIyzS yOtFceBi9w+LCb43WF512oJzE8oaexLYjqH9jkRPBkjyjPlNuhqdrK34pRNmHNN/ 49ILZ4kJjym54thtdTQfb/gltOA8mTSK6kb1TLOjCFypvksQSx4xFcAVGBMNnecd EV0ydzRHWVzCx8KzSxHiJeN1BQk+I0fxIM4XNnF7Bv1sqfN/dLmPSB4yaI/CQkE9 KLMPpwhoEGX8hi1AsHdqnYbLRNED3QeS5/P3yI+A9zNiDbtwohr01ERT4HFAAyGA ebQEvrq3AUvUvqkuj40T =swk0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --295T7DuFa0DalPJ4oRE949Xjwnnfl9GUm-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 05:54:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB8CB4C2B9; Fri, 27 May 2016 05:54:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark.tinka@seacom.mu) Received: from the-host.seacom.mu (ge-1.ln-01-jnb.za.seacomnet.com [105.28.96.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D61C10CE; Fri, 27 May 2016 05:54:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark.tinka@seacom.mu) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=Mark-Tinkas-MacBook.local) by the-host.seacom.mu with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id O7TN2U-0003O8-D5; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:54:30 +0200 Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD To: Kevin Oberman , tinc@tinc-vpn.org, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , Mailinglists FreeBSD References: <20160519124446.GB2444@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160523034855.GA37797@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160524061707.GA77980@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> From: Mark Tinka Message-ID: Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 07:54:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 05:54:34 -0000 On 27/May/16 06:11, Kevin Oberman wrote: > There are a lot of excellent reasons to avoid ULAs. There are a very few > good, or even so-so reasons to use them. The most commonly cited reason is > security which is almost always wrong. In almost 20 years of working with > IPv6 I have yet to see any valid security reason for using ULAs. There are > any number of excellent papers on this. > > The most valid use is when you can only get a /64 from your provider. RFCs > recommend a minimum assignment to residential customers of a /56 but many > providers seem to have missed this, so there is no choice. prefixes longer > than /64 are effectively not possible. IPv6 does not care, but the > supporting protocols , make a /64 or shorter assumption. More intractable > is that hardware also often make similar assumptions. As you learned, you > really, really don't waste your time trying to make it work. > > I really guess all of this needs to be in the handbook so people don't > waste time trying to do things that are documented to either not work or > not work effectively. And, unless you are really, really sure you need > ULAs, They mostly just break things. Fully agree. Mark. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 06:01:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61508B4C472 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmarquess@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3246A152A for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:01:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmarquess@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pa0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id xk12so36853727pac.0 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 23:01:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject :mime-version; bh=C/SRH6IE6UBsJl19OWqRnKfK0HytzLnHkZTzkwkP23A=; b=x6TlC8vo3LjqVGMS8QOUQ8SjK+aifpyz6VlnMXjkBvCPVUzr7R03ZRApvqwPoLDz2Y WBCY4j+Fq6JhFe2AUqCjiCYt/duZzr/rMjlwBsO5d0Q5KFfOktaufG39YSZf2Uo5wfp4 q7KeHs0rhHOdJnVJuRXYqZSAbF669oO1Xwuv/ErmzL6rzjUQhq06wqSAHAN5rZZZln/R R6MYFBwp1DVyBlCYuSynsHk+lPnI3uiM4JLfPk8piMyOAMlFqeI83YOHFHketiMxUDlM JrzAYamdpdCWmJ+MogqCvKcdF50l3dwPdeEHKM4Uq7H6nVa/gxih48a0kWeoJTGz0RLG ekuA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:mime-version; bh=C/SRH6IE6UBsJl19OWqRnKfK0HytzLnHkZTzkwkP23A=; b=GAnYH3lJZQtgE2zCiVh8NLfXUm0+xflrSU+OkgpnQ+UzEOI7RmX1DJGGDvVyRVSVCu tplmya4BCdT/dD/kAkukQM9w/tvv3y3DhMVpusDDcBe3/xa8p+yifenG2DWW0m1HvaLz IN+nt4LdBSwH1OZI1q1kGbrLOaz8OLriB2Fh6odpkq4uV2gx/5VyJMIN82+0PN9IhLci +AbxyJ99WGOGjYEF6RWhNjWhO4NHKAeQs9jtTzW2WvKx3X34fT5LhoG7MUzVt+2R5HUZ XUJFe8fNVvMju8tsNG2tmFZ4orZXHh1EM7QoRNKSUj5qmXJ2J57GVMCIA6eLaiU1GTS5 QkyA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tK73Qc8crMptMtt3ITxjk01+1qBEIhUK6n9uDEIsLGeIbmL7KtksN30yNMZYZl+hQ== X-Received: by 10.66.164.195 with SMTP id ys3mr19531745pab.97.1464328859711; Thu, 26 May 2016 23:00:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.outlook.com (ec2-52-34-97-60.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com. [52.34.97.60]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e2sm10327706pfd.20.2016.05.26.23.00.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 26 May 2016 23:00:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 06:00:58 +0000 (UTC) From: Dustin Marquess To: Garrett Wollman Cc: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <201605270457.u4R4vYqu018911@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> References: <201605270457.u4R4vYqu018911@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> Subject: Re: Changing MTU on cxgbe MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Outlook for iOS and Android Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 06:01:00 -0000 I tried setting it via ifconfig_cxgbe0 in rc.conf, but that didn't seem to work either. -Dustin On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 9:57 PM -0700, "Garrett Wollman" wrote: In article you write: ># ifconfig -m cxgbe0 >cxgbe0: flags=8943 ># ifconfig cxgbe0 mtu 9000 >ifconfig: ioctl SIOCSIFMTU (set mtu): Invalid argument I believe this device, like many others, does not allow the MTU (or actually the MRU) to be changed once the receive ring has been set up You may be able to do it if you down the interface first, or you may have to do it at boot time before anything else (and in particular before the interface is marked "up" for the first time). -GAWollman From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 06:35:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DA3B4CD0B for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:35:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nparhar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x235.google.com (mail-pf0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4692C1D8D for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:35:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nparhar@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf0-x235.google.com with SMTP id b124so38778631pfb.0 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 23:35:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=7866RGmquE2klJ++nINFni6n2hKxsPfba6ek0612MWA=; b=Xp0/38r5nLPPxS4gLn8bmZXxakDRCU4ynnDnM4gEpwfSBL325h9YgHmVjUIayGqXT7 ljaENAv0KL+SOGWSTBzgVr9/pgpMnGNx5RgtkwQz9P4FvcXlOGenS6lRQU+R76NG4OAp pbqS9+0BhbVTxxdqY2yj1BUj/d/Iushk5n7gh0FiBVfMnX8K9cEUTHOnn9T4LhtnC8qw 9YYrM0X3Tby0uSz440cVnPRkD5XjRv3Xmx993ovp/5x2tp+ueWbViuEbhY9OZtsK2gqO UR0FfWNtX3xyWMOSBqbokfvC1tK/22A7kvlj9/8Hq2z/Gx7dB6twhFMp3ZrgbvCiEhP5 Uhsw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=7866RGmquE2klJ++nINFni6n2hKxsPfba6ek0612MWA=; b=d/3785ZawCmX7hsPNUztDwRUmXe6ZdSfJ9T2BlurSdsxoKnBPBDny7svNm8QrZRV33 JPXqPgKUPhpcBk0apsamCHD8NNXL8ukQPLVLj2rBu7xewnzsRkf5yRlDp1U9+iH/zJ30 NP6ct39a+CkZi9+zES+ZWq4TXLl9moYfInF+uddHa2jtRAceIhbzMkr6AtCAjcF3cOll zd0SxzJwu+prh6p8BWZDVuaHjQ5SFmVNKqZq5WK3pSfl8IY/nT80tRRSHVYXP+Ukxdad r8kWFqdhMvCx2b3Roj8QxjFM4iEyPM8YEBmeRuIUFOxYqZdW+pSn4oJ207avlrxgkVVY j+LA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tICctpEiWdeW1q0guyHouM8JuMFThNnrL/ho2vcZsI/3NE8IhRPWwep3iBfHlEH0w== X-Received: by 10.98.23.18 with SMTP id 18mr20037805pfx.96.1464330931640; Thu, 26 May 2016 23:35:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ox ([2601:641:c180:c600:29bb:647c:963d:7705]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 7sm10625626pfn.30.2016.05.26.23.35.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 26 May 2016 23:35:30 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Navdeep Parhar Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 23:35:22 -0700 From: Navdeep Parhar To: Dustin Marquess Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Changing MTU on cxgbe Message-ID: <20160527063522.GA10148@ox> Mail-Followup-To: Dustin Marquess , freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 06:35:32 -0000 On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 11:52:45PM -0500, Dustin Marquess wrote: > After my many issues with ixgbe & ixv, I ended up removing the Intel > X520s with Chelsio T420-CR and the Intel X710s with Chelsio T520-CR. > So far so good, except I can't seem to change the MTU away from 1500. > In fact, ifconfig can't seem to change the mtu at all. On -CURRENT as > of yesterday: > > # ifconfig -m cxgbe0 > cxgbe0: flags=8943 > metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=ec07bb > capabilities=ecc7bb > ether 00:07:43:11:2b:80 > nd6 options=29 > media: Ethernet 10Gbase-Twinax > status: active > supported media: > media 10Gbase-Twinax mediaopt full-duplex > > # ifconfig cxgbe0 mtu 9000 > ifconfig: ioctl SIOCSIFMTU (set mtu): Invalid argument > > # ifconfig cxgbe0 mtu 1500 > ifconfig: ioctl SIOCSIFMTU (set mtu): Invalid argument > > Any ideas? It should have worked. I tried just now on a system running -CURRENT as of today (r300785) and didn't encounter any problems. # ifconfig cxl0 up # ifconfig cxl0 mtu 500 # ifconfig cxl0 mtu 3333 # ifconfig cxl0 mtu 7992 ... Is the cxgbe/cxl ifnet part of a lagg or bridge or something like that? Run this while you try the ifconfig and see what ioctls are failing with EINVAL. You may have to do a "kldload dtraceall" before this. # dtrace -n 'fbt::*_ioctl:return /arg1 == 22/ {}' > Also, the Chelsios don't seem to use iovctl to do SR-IOV like the > Intels did (I'm using bhyve). I assume that's what the > hw.cxgbe.num_vis loader setting is for? num_vis does create multiple autonomous ifnets that share the same physical port but it doesn't involve SR-IOV. Regards, Navdeep From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 06:37:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFDCB4CE23 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:37:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nparhar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x230.google.com (mail-pf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F285A100E for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 06:37:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nparhar@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id f144so25655209pfa.3 for ; Thu, 26 May 2016 23:37:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ragZqB4y4HnfbjfFo6/kP9jDPUR64bA9ceX2rhDSyA8=; b=odkVAJTFtDs6RBntjBkktZPRefG46onzWELSXmPzBzpu5tnm6KFR/Vp4IT3LFjUey4 clyoEPo3fx6bNwrWS1AxJrRoHsGg5folIgHRR9mnp8tx2kruwJdBB19kx9cXwypQYdy+ asviOsX9/sC2OQhVuuQ+C6oyk22TMy266+UBjnh0WdYIxI0OAnDAXUO10i8qOArVPHz3 +exIqWmjOpnlsPPb5iy8wsGleNnOlAMwZMRk7hOPcb5ax/e1msyAQNh/cUPN0GDB5E17 j42c4w/PxYUKEZ2AZLDB/MmSGpNmTTKTM5DkeWN6C2af/5oBnneCi21H9ayDIDGFJmeD Dgpg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ragZqB4y4HnfbjfFo6/kP9jDPUR64bA9ceX2rhDSyA8=; b=d7vatazTYjbkVwBBieHxd/ItLtwWbGc5wsBpsIow3EsALBelZ3yTvz1gOrAfcObzgd /1iKfovXLdfM71/ocGivrvXLdSJLt0O0qKjn17GdspRtNHBHkyIfV3aBaMxq21lnhVUg NJghvI3YWsymoPnmgO2O/Q0svNHpPthQZrVMrj6FSfMQL7oy/cAlbDZ6g7PZM1InvFnx dATVW7DJhb2tKI3yB+EQzvHsvv9rQiWbh0+QrlXO+6+2EpgQuyl44aI2k2LqQdb2I5kU SJTscSUsnh0UB3hD1306YTWMyeU8ODrkQUfZ/9ZmOEdVzTZy08Y7ZYojcCGZq0hc9F4y PYVw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKa8fza2RsNsDFRPGFEdixhrpbOMrLbiD5K08HQHBHcgTPbt81218j5N2BNyCn1Qw== X-Received: by 10.98.28.74 with SMTP id c71mr15778959pfc.131.1464331054525; Thu, 26 May 2016 23:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ox ([2601:641:c180:c600:29bb:647c:963d:7705]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id vw1sm25092827pab.35.2016.05.26.23.37.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 26 May 2016 23:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 23:37:31 -0700 From: Navdeep Parhar To: Garrett Wollman Cc: dmarquess@gmail.com, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Changing MTU on cxgbe Message-ID: <20160527063731.GB10148@ox> Mail-Followup-To: Garrett Wollman , dmarquess@gmail.com, freebsd-net@freebsd.org References: <201605270457.u4R4vYqu018911@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201605270457.u4R4vYqu018911@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 06:37:35 -0000 On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:57:34AM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > In article you write: > > ># ifconfig -m cxgbe0 > >cxgbe0: flags=8943 > > ># ifconfig cxgbe0 mtu 9000 > >ifconfig: ioctl SIOCSIFMTU (set mtu): Invalid argument > > I believe this device, like many others, does not allow the MTU (or > actually the MRU) to be changed once the receive ring has been set up This is not correct. You can change the MTU of a cxgbe/cxl interface at any time (whether it's up or down, passing traffic or idle, etc.). Regards, Navdeep From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 07:00:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B053B4B39B for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:00:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66E921B5D for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:00:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: (qmail 83570 invoked from network); 27 May 2016 06:53:55 -0000 Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (HELO localhost) (195.1.209.33) by bizet.nethelp.no with SMTP; 27 May 2016 06:53:55 -0000 Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 08:53:55 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20160527.085355.74680254.sthaug@nethelp.no> To: mark.tinka@seacom.mu Cc: tinc@tinc-vpn.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD,Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD From: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: <016845dd-2c42-5aeb-f65d-02a6fb77acec@seacom.mu> References: <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <016845dd-2c42-5aeb-f65d-02a6fb77acec@seacom.mu> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 07:00:41 -0000 > > Here lies the first problem. It seems that it's not legitimate to assign > > /96 subnets when using unique local addresses (ULAs). I was right > > getting some /48 subnet for my local IPv6 network; some easy way to get > > one generated randomly is http://unique-local-ipv6.com/ . But instead of > > assigning /96 subnets to each host, you must assign /64 subnets. I guess > > (but I am not sure because I have not found any reference that mentions > > this explicitly) you *must not* use any other subnet when dealing with > > ULAs. > > > > So I decided for the following two subnets for machine A and > > B respectively: fd16:dcc0:f4cc:1::/64 and fd16:dcc0:f4cc:2::/64. > > Interesting, I did not know that. > > I know that if you want SLAAC to work, you need to assign a /64 prefix. > > We use /112's for hosts but based on GUA's, and that works fine. I don't see any problem using ULA with for instance /124 netmask: lab1# ifconfig bce1.85 inet6 fd00:8c0:3::521/124 lab1# ifconfig bce1.85 bce1.85: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=103 ether 00:1a:64:94:d9:ae inet 172.17.85.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.17.85.255 inet6 fe80::21a:64ff:fe94:d9ae%bce1.85 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x15 inet6 fd00:8c0:3::521 prefixlen 124 nd6 options=21 lab2# ifconfig bce1.85 inet6 fd00:8c0:3::522/124 lab2# ifconfig bce1.85 bce1.85: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=103 ether 00:1a:64:78:fa:ea inet 172.17.85.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.17.85.255 inet6 fe80::21a:64ff:fe78:faea%bce1.85 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x13 inet6 fd00:8c0:3::522 prefixlen 124 nd6 options=21 lab2# ping6 fd00:8c0:3::521 PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) fd00:8c0:3::522 --> fd00:8c0:3::521 16 bytes from fd00:8c0:3::521, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=0.600 ms 96 bit works too: lab1# ifconfig bce1.85 inet6 fd00:8c0:3:1:1:1::1/96 lab2# ifconfig bce1.85 inet6 fd00:8c0:3:1:1:1::2/96 lab2# ping6 fd00:8c0:3:1:1:1::1 PING6(56=40+8+8 bytes) fd00:8c0:3:1:1:1:0:2 --> fd00:8c0:3:1:1:1:0:1 16 bytes from fd00:8c0:3:1:1:1:0:1, icmp_seq=0 hlim=64 time=0.585 ms Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 07:09:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A63CB4B6D4; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:09:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from niklaas@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu) Received: from box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (box-fra-01.niklaas.eu [46.165.253.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3162713A0; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:09:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from niklaas@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu) Received: by box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 17D6961FEC; Fri, 27 May 2016 09:09:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 09:09:01 +0200 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, tinc@tinc-vpn.org, Mailinglists FreeBSD Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD Message-ID: <20160527070901.GA7911@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, tinc@tinc-vpn.org, Mailinglists FreeBSD References: <20160519124446.GB2444@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160523034855.GA37797@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160524061707.GA77980@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 07:09:04 -0000 --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Kevin Oberman [2016-05-26 21:11 -0700] : > There are a lot of excellent reasons to avoid ULAs. There are a very > few good, or even so-so reasons to use them. The most commonly cited > reason is security which is almost always wrong. In almost 20 years of > working with IPv6 I have yet to see any valid security reason for > using ULAs. There are any number of excellent papers on this. Kevin, thanks for your comment. I have no professional background in IT, so I really appreciate your remarks. > The most valid use is when you can only get a /64 from your provider. I got a /112 for each of my virtual servers... So, I decided to go for ULAs for the VPN between them. > I really guess all of this needs to be in the handbook so people don't > waste time trying to do things that are documented to either not work > or not work effectively. And, unless you are really, really sure you > need ULAs, They mostly just break things. I agree. In addition, I would like to emphasise that it should be in both FreeBSD's and tinc's handbook. I guess I could have known, if I had read the RFCs, but adding some notes in the handbook(s) would ease things a lot. --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXR/KHAAoJEG2fODeJrIU/ai8P/jQRlPHFPp7cZ7Ws1jwo5erm knh1UJHdNUknRyxgLAYxFK35tYiEKgWNS3m/Ra03iRmXozS9R+IrDkJdxI4ik9o5 5DlSIr8MMB9dsghOoPQfIAEwW8yOsIFdPs+FohpbSevm7MIEpjncvhV+6yTA6LDs +ZP0bGTGTm+/wFwVNYjvbwhCd7PtRXTsUGPNjU/byMT48eNg/mHDnIszJQTE00JM 0KXtzbsPBETjc8FPTJqYfOR0EjrPO99y1uF9ZKVSyw37D7nRIgTAQFO1nZmZ7Q27 U7eIbwwOIW12M1fl2YA+HSWkW1tXDxOAznwi27Cjz/YHETqmqECYa4Gkl9/NIUvS i8MM6VsLD/62gr6CvfaMMugLm9gqxx/OoQtYAYwdE0a4J1y/PoIvVfxfqb1tmdw2 DO0qePwrTHh5YBaXaUIOTjhgMxjtyxfJh41gM0viATNkVRo6B19oTnen+9ba3TST Fm2u4+r8wT+HvPZJvk5VLaHAj5Ic5wDR8WiiDxgLDMOtka+2k7uW5dS7gk7I3lQ1 4nxpLAdD+DKyuhlc91VVAJwG0RQ3V3iecLHe3xeg/bM+8KZYCqxJ5FL9Pwati8mt iETPapfToPvskh38gQluOXidbhnqjc5QDZ3rinNke7AK1a07odLO2ayi2rq77YEq l72rDOf2bEfsA1vXLDqi =etyx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 07:23:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678B5B4BC1A for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:23:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kmacybsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x22b.google.com (mail-ig0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30F1E1D84 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:23:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kmacybsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id ww4so103354231igb.1 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:23:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to; bh=HU0eRMDXIAYfzzHTNWt3nXYgZWMp1YctKXQP8am165o=; b=N3RsM/8eKWHRD0lmq1ujmIPbNYJFLJ0UGsKtEc/fp7nn54GEo28CNw4+O2XtagBn2N 6/H6qm4SEgz0R88jvr2FZ5C2EvOW//Cn99ZbFWwCRjKd7HpJzKa0heWF9K7Wm6RZvvou HF7NqNUqS4FkCFR3wR0DrI5Q64BORxxwBHWgIMXJp1D4Wy/wNcRbHfhIEVT+RIti+1/d 5wDXnjL7lSjFQ4mPUpGV3rdZFLDNxiRUzFEkYc2MO7WyuCi+gOmkI7DHvZqkH20hFm2L In9/4TxN3c6B4XyK5KjQsmu0C7Oy4olv4WC0mfvKgz9Uk68lofGx6tMq2adB5pXB+xan jr+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=HU0eRMDXIAYfzzHTNWt3nXYgZWMp1YctKXQP8am165o=; b=jwJ0+PqwaQsKqchLRGGwr40iJPYLYFMjOuMqk64MzSdhu9181r7nwVP4usf5kkMQMa 01fTBv7A4KKTmNFXHSCqK3lE/ZRAnx6nPOMogKs+iM9SnFTV1THQctmrlSiE9wXyspfh T5xZgPFFE4OO9IZoDuSSYaBAUG/veuQDBOsogW09tX5pn3DbLN0g4EMEkJVPnjxpNyB7 +ZQhBbpee/CSn7yblg+gXy0BAdAf52H6/2jk6AWu7ACBco5Gnf9T+As6tHK6yDTejcGv DbqCJpERE/4dKUd9Cp1OdNrFPtxleLExdfzv4Tgu52/SDfJ3M6bIbFLPvZlPL+5pIGKa tEoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIiYiFv/ICVBfTwTBQhwRPvj4wr97sdEqi00oK1lU1ADPQtCbbtQm94iOkUgbrEkaWJGoAEAWA7Z/keAw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.228.47 with SMTP id sf15mr6574121igc.63.1464333782562; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:23:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kmacybsd@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.132.212 with HTTP; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:23:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160527063731.GB10148@ox> References: <201605270457.u4R4vYqu018911@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <20160527063731.GB10148@ox> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 00:23:02 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 39a80qSqhs237gU6Ee_aMqV87Wo Message-ID: Subject: Re: Changing MTU on cxgbe From: "K. Macy" To: Garrett Wollman , "dmarquess@gmail.com" , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 07:23:03 -0000 On Thursday, May 26, 2016, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:57:34AM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > > In article < > CAJpsHY4vF5Ky6GuAusLOOROgiQuyD2CcRmVxu8x3cArQRZxcbg@mail.gmail.com > > you write: > > > > ># ifconfig -m cxgbe0 > > >cxgbe0: flags=8943 > > > > ># ifconfig cxgbe0 mtu 9000 > > >ifconfig: ioctl SIOCSIFMTU (set mtu): Invalid argument > > > > I believe this device, like many others, does not allow the MTU (or > > actually the MRU) to be changed once the receive ring has been set up > > This is not correct. You can change the MTU of a cxgbe/cxl interface at > any time (whether it's up or down, passing traffic or idle, etc.). For some reason the stack needs init to be called when the MTU is changed for it to actually change the size of the packets passed to the driver. At least cxgb does not do that. I'm not at my computer right now, but cxgbe may be the same. If that's the case just up / down the interface. It _will_ take effect without that if it's passed at module load. > > Regards,ll > Navdeep > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 07:29:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8173B4BD35 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:29:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nparhar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A88FC1056; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:29:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nparhar@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pa0-x230.google.com with SMTP id eu11so28522297pad.3; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:29:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=s3z8xufxkkFz+gEd6kq2Z6UsE2Lh/Zhz6p0BcQW8xqA=; b=M/yAOgR3rolLgUuj46knzSgT5GMrswh4sbPo0GK8d0mQiwF2FX5S0SODwLrcXo7//H BOBQHunxA1PULYP64mEqGTjNm6JB8sR6+KBF4OxRE5Qw9Wg+DrcTak5DpoFtdbKjFbYQ IDpi3HJmN1M/9u/HdvxTSKpw8If04hgS0uoF2hJR97sOmjnIh3zsGPbVMr4QhFYPlcjS 2lj9BtvttNlxLF3TWyDJ2QOhWpPWS8QgW558YFcEOFtu6DR5Hd+rUK+/LuA5TlPjqsro Thir+xvYIKCkvlXxK922ooj2pg4+dET68gKAsiGJZDADQwmMt9qaXwRZNhbLf0N3LK7J Da2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=s3z8xufxkkFz+gEd6kq2Z6UsE2Lh/Zhz6p0BcQW8xqA=; b=G0Tto6caF3t1vQDDJFDl4lUQJQyWd0uZOHm6RlCmd9MS9ekAJL9zeXkSDqIjOG5zuK BnR1lqZkclTb8FwpomrDKI6AfC1NM+yCl2BE/V+I/6ZlDqrMI4bSFmDLka+U9I6O0QD5 r8i9epKY3r/NRglomVaNCznDYXDFpVrV7rbTaoiGnpSPp1jYSMsAX/M/ERi936ZIIdtq qa238FOoZW9QLxVD3ADmmD/QJELrOPRglrL45izo2BoVLHo96WUKB1kr2PNCj+0gXfEp 1C8y3xMMvPaGd0fueuZuV8pvH5bnT3k37JlFD5OOuOpVurlMNl4lVjanDdKxYTHSv8NU tfxQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJTAKhHlEcqA8yL+jb9vrhM06KJISANd0nloIMLV3RvOS/EAoGQNPKW0/IMnRBkRg== X-Received: by 10.66.136.41 with SMTP id px9mr20270211pab.80.1464334195129; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ox ([2601:641:c180:c600:29bb:647c:963d:7705]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h16sm11119112pfj.0.2016.05.27.00.29.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 27 May 2016 00:29:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 00:29:51 -0700 From: Navdeep Parhar To: "K. Macy" Cc: Garrett Wollman , "dmarquess@gmail.com" , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Changing MTU on cxgbe Message-ID: <20160527072951.GC10148@ox> Mail-Followup-To: "K. Macy" , Garrett Wollman , "dmarquess@gmail.com" , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" References: <201605270457.u4R4vYqu018911@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <20160527063731.GB10148@ox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 07:29:55 -0000 On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:23:02AM -0700, K. Macy wrote: > On Thursday, May 26, 2016, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:57:34AM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > > > In article < > > CAJpsHY4vF5Ky6GuAusLOOROgiQuyD2CcRmVxu8x3cArQRZxcbg@mail.gmail.com > > > you write: > > > > > > ># ifconfig -m cxgbe0 > > > >cxgbe0: flags=8943 > > > > > > ># ifconfig cxgbe0 mtu 9000 > > > >ifconfig: ioctl SIOCSIFMTU (set mtu): Invalid argument > > > > > > I believe this device, like many others, does not allow the MTU (or > > > actually the MRU) to be changed once the receive ring has been set up > > > > This is not correct. You can change the MTU of a cxgbe/cxl interface at > > any time (whether it's up or down, passing traffic or idle, etc.). > > > For some reason the stack needs init to be called when the MTU is changed > for it to actually change the size of the packets passed to the driver. At > least cxgb does not do that. I'm not at my computer right now, but cxgbe > may be the same. If that's the case just up / down the interface. It _will_ > take effect without that if it's passed at module load. The problem that was reported was that the ioctl that sets the MTU failed, not that the ioctl succeeded but the MTU change did not take effect. Regards, Navdeep From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 07:38:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC16B4C10E for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:38:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kmacybsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x22e.google.com (mail-it0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 174D11A0C; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:38:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kmacybsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id l63so68277665ita.1; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:38:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to; bh=8Kz9Nb6VsMB7Y0Rjaj3CT6aY6JGNP6Tx6pGaNJcGGgE=; b=LfbIG8oy3B05ISGkQgoqd4PWJq1wtTYL/YVgGWN4KqqpUp3WI4WHiWoc4N45LtKRAf U9h/i+gDd+v4V8AmXQ/fyYFLE8oJqGHgg/+S3q/oCXNPCPAPq2VifQZfYpTcvwGWE3/f N7yQ8BnlqvRRB2dpXc5Tgu2dwcjaHYZzqcEKy6SkohVhMl2YDRwFOhX6xViWNZVPfUvt /HU18NikU86GSldfgK5K40/OJJOPACc6BmWZWNWTnBLim9JjDdqPnazNIWh6r6fK+uP+ 7GH9i6dy4/4KtSpzU1tuRNjaH5oWuXQxxmhfdoH8gqz3L2Mz793G4/Nc96WaEEQf/xCq SVRQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=8Kz9Nb6VsMB7Y0Rjaj3CT6aY6JGNP6Tx6pGaNJcGGgE=; b=mli4sft8fNI4OVpc+61DLOOzMubuqwMIl3ExdzoX0wg3Yx0HCEApN3RYLJuLNI/7sl JRqWEmjoUnuojSMcztc5mR2rxrDj5b5wsytlBTmmXmb+UDU8sp7iqsLAt0MLVNC0q5mF mxRIlGplQJmZEu+WVQNh86KXM5rgI6n5wd7Zs7dfHqUOE/T5l6VSkJQnqt7HiMUIGnez 7f1/wfWQRaN0/JSPwDlYDbPqjQuUZDLamNbo+P5FY5rdzO/cmV4ou+aNngpKQHOBu/KS MQ3NuITsKKd7tvIQrLiF+LPRLSl/+mHxpIhEAW5yjPs08qS+Ot9lL7RSkZL+yUU7S4mS eQUw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIGdthrEjIMugR/r9Iwx/pRkOkIGaI6OKG88F5ncUT0Os1vo9v87TWIQLDL2eFvtgdu1yn4IywHYnFbRQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.36.29.13 with SMTP id 13mr6475022itj.99.1464334687513; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:38:07 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kmacybsd@gmail.com Received: by 10.107.132.212 with HTTP; Fri, 27 May 2016 00:38:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160527072951.GC10148@ox> References: <201605270457.u4R4vYqu018911@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <20160527063731.GB10148@ox> <20160527072951.GC10148@ox> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 00:38:07 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: KbuuQhfph4buc54EaZ3FD4S4S-U Message-ID: Subject: Re: Changing MTU on cxgbe From: "K. Macy" To: "K. Macy" , Garrett Wollman , "dmarquess@gmail.com" , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 07:38:08 -0000 On Friday, May 27, 2016, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:23:02AM -0700, K. Macy wrote: > > On Thursday, May 26, 2016, Navdeep Parhar > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:57:34AM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > > > > In article < > > > CAJpsHY4vF5Ky6GuAusLOOROgiQuyD2CcRmVxu8x3cArQRZxcbg@mail.gmail.com > > > > > you write: > > > > > > > > ># ifconfig -m cxgbe0 > > > > >cxgbe0: flags=8943 > > > > > > > > ># ifconfig cxgbe0 mtu 9000 > > > > >ifconfig: ioctl SIOCSIFMTU (set mtu): Invalid argument > > > > > > > > I believe this device, like many others, does not allow the MTU (or > > > > actually the MRU) to be changed once the receive ring has been set up > > > > > > This is not correct. You can change the MTU of a cxgbe/cxl interface > at > > > any time (whether it's up or down, passing traffic or idle, etc.). > > > > > > For some reason the stack needs init to be called when the MTU is changed > > for it to actually change the size of the packets passed to the driver. > At > > least cxgb does not do that. I'm not at my computer right now, but cxgbe > > may be the same. If that's the case just up / down the interface. It > _will_ > > take effect without that if it's passed at module load. Sorry. Continue on. -M > > The problem that was reported was that the ioctl that sets the MTU > failed, not that the ioctl succeeded but the MTU change did not take > effect. > Regards, > Navdeep > From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 08:03:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF1CB4CAA1 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 08:03:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D3291C6D for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 08:03:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4R83VEY000133 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 08:03:32 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209758] Broadcom 5717 C not working Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 08:03:32 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: shurd@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 08:03:32 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209758 --- Comment #11 from Stephen Hurd --- (In reply to Giuliano from comment #9) Add single-quotes around the URL or escape the question mark: cd /usr/src fetch -o - 'https://bz-attachments.freebsd.org/attachment.cgi?id=3D170681' | patch -p1 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 08:11:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49DAAB4CC1E; Fri, 27 May 2016 08:11:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: from box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (box-fra-01.niklaas.eu [IPv6:2a00:c98:2200:af07:6::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DFD1E21; Fri, 27 May 2016 08:11:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: by box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6112361FEC; Fri, 27 May 2016 10:11:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 10:11:12 +0200 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, tinc@tinc-vpn.org Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD,Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD Message-ID: <20160527081112.GA9827@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, tinc@tinc-vpn.org References: <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <016845dd-2c42-5aeb-f65d-02a6fb77acec@seacom.mu> <20160527.085355.74680254.sthaug@nethelp.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160527.085355.74680254.sthaug@nethelp.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 08:11:15 -0000 --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline sthaug@nethelp.no [2016-05-27 08:53 +0200] : > I don't see any problem using ULA with for instance /124 netmask: [...] > 96 bit works too: [...] FreeBSD version? Mine is 10.3-RELEASE-p3. Dunno. Could be that I made some mistake but I also tried the setup with /96 and adding the route to the tap0 interface and it did not work. Niklaas --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXSAERAAoJEG2fODeJrIU/gT8P/jmFYdb80paqS3JMoIuIha3O OT4hlqGjC2fifqrUSNFbacly/32aHnYkJflj1L9i+yxpBj+xsqCjCC7jlBAcA/S3 y3i9ssyAINGnpJFPNJlfy0HGnLFQmtSIpKMF78okbp5a2C8yc/faaPWNbL+ENk9/ 1cRF5D+OHJcIX7vYG4GEiAGbDeyT46ShcCc4X96Ib9JUlG9MOcA41RlyDmjWDPPL b7DhUg1+3GcJNzEJyjw5Ku1bXx8FEjFlYg7lLzkNNtdqTKe9DYyUIcQKshdjQX++ es+QNQ7DWE7FANdobaGJOOhwbVhw79zRxNHNlA9P+RCsqubJSbFSveQm1ywhvM5n keWJextLhWxFkeFwQcSfYEOX0RDAk0fZmKTHOb+/aCiTVfgCbghn/Aa1qaAViM1x iRduZOrZj49iK/C2h0yU4vyCUpZKAO1GQx3VcmXnirBjeLrUkfqK6QLwhLE5RIBT uw5LkJhbw0erdRvP2Mhuxb9swY6V2GG14L1m7pTc6hvy4aMEB0daiAjggfPOEu0s JD7weR1rMbeGFszkdbLZ8C3LJNwyxpL+L6+4Ob2dcT7vBWBrjK/R3TmrcUPnpsff bGEmeGODyVWg9z2GxGrhescn+z7YFEx9tN/EVyxJKbycxNCHbi0KhEvrr69l1CKd WcEih1wMqJeo5SlkgbU5 =7FDq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 08:40:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B743B49739 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 08:40:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 581DA1082 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 08:40:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no) Received: (qmail 89479 invoked from network); 27 May 2016 08:40:32 -0000 Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (HELO localhost) (195.1.209.33) by bizet.nethelp.no with SMTP; 27 May 2016 08:40:32 -0000 Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 10:40:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <20160527.104032.41706561.sthaug@nethelp.no> To: stdin@niklaas.eu Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, tinc@tinc-vpn.org Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD,Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD From: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: <20160527081112.GA9827@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> References: <016845dd-2c42-5aeb-f65d-02a6fb77acec@seacom.mu> <20160527.085355.74680254.sthaug@nethelp.no> <20160527081112.GA9827@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 08:40:35 -0000 > > I don't see any problem using ULA with for instance /124 netmask: > [...] > > 96 bit works too: > [...] > > FreeBSD version? Mine is 10.3-RELEASE-p3. lab1 is 10.3-PRERELEASE r297313M lab2 is 10.2-STABLE r288601M Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 10:23:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84E5B4BA72 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 10:23:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D96F21A0D for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 10:23:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4RANMe5060716 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 10:23:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209758] Broadcom 5717 C not working Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 10:23:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: giulianosperandio@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 10:23:23 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209758 --- Comment #12 from Giuliano --- (In reply to Stephen Hurd from comment #11) Dear Stephen, single-quote makes fetch command works. But the patch command ask for 'File= to patch:' and I have no idea what to type. Is it possible to have a new modul= e to execute kldload? Best regards, Giuliano --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 11:06:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C4D9B4C7CB for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 11:06:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C7AA1F82 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 11:06:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4RB6IR4097681 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 11:06:18 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 204735] [net] Outgoing packets being sent via wrong interface Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 11:06:18 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: ykirill@yahoo.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 11:06:18 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D204735 ykirill@yahoo.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ykirill@yahoo.com --- Comment #2 from ykirill@yahoo.com --- I faced the same problem. After some time some outgoing connections starts = to balance on all available interfaces. Clearing and then applying default rou= te helps for some time. I removed pf and rewrite all my rules for ipfw but pro= blem is reappearing after some time. My kernels are mostly copied from 9 STABLE with additions from 10 STABLE a= nd have too: options FLOWTABLE # per-cpu routing cache Now i disabled it with: sysctl net.flowtable.enable=3D0 I'll look if this problem happens again --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 17:32:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2647B4C4C4 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 17:32:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmarquess@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x243.google.com (mail-io0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A46514C5; Fri, 27 May 2016 17:32:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmarquess@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x243.google.com with SMTP id m17so5719601ioi.3; Fri, 27 May 2016 10:32:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=XYmAnMlzlluFwfWX30e242sZ3H2tVoMTiIce7CW5Ln8=; b=RMv309SxecGp/e1vlrT5OlA/v88umzhnTCqbw3mQafh0bTOxfWCNxH/AiYFDaEoU9W pH/6PwtWCssKcdq8tAAsJ4+SuwStQmCmkmCRL+zfpFTFaRK0T6njaGJ/2ulm1Po/FdW5 /o0HUJ4FJQcQtnrmtwO+iNEx+QGzf+nELkQ8eTmUOBT+5JmSQprTmVdBDsJYCRcQLFXg fZ4kxL1qEG0uq2m4lTvRAhTF1Y3dGbAczUgxiZtf8v9ze7heYdn6+1VtNEqm68gM7gB3 pbrTgaTgo6f4BFtIxqEMONjNqUbd+LRroqZF69mb6NEl+zgTS9oJVWfmxF9lXOsRL5b4 qbqg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=XYmAnMlzlluFwfWX30e242sZ3H2tVoMTiIce7CW5Ln8=; b=IiFnEsZ7oIPjwPnUCPaulwTHw+KcK++JDHxTpwP7cJj/HKbm8FI6EK03hO4Gd6i16M 2QYsPRSpD8fHD8TV+gax9UYOX9Lb/YnVMZrFPgCx9RwEOQF+lbk8FCz7u1WuKSrQF4jD f1KGDvdrXjNdrWsnUorgfmkFQ9oHAP0QSPrGHCzK9lCrl9ZGQS0guO51YtZN3bPAz5m5 kMJx33kMj5Elm8r2S1+VUv9bLhu2S64wzT+qRYFlGzTy4JV1jpPWwfsQBOVi2Y3I0BV5 tdb+Yc2M4gE+Tslq5OpMc+skqOV51PG4NeuaczU6a+t8VyeE3h6mJjgbHuzwyAlZdI1l 9Aow== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJ4KbLYp1EaIpgKoIof9TT43z+EI3tk5JwBMFBZG6zDfkADxaVvoPh78ee8G99GHJ1nvZHsXPsIdbz63w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.46.158 with SMTP id u30mr14620116iou.162.1464370372818; Fri, 27 May 2016 10:32:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.107.148.69 with HTTP; Fri, 27 May 2016 10:32:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160527072951.GC10148@ox> References: <201605270457.u4R4vYqu018911@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <20160527063731.GB10148@ox> <20160527072951.GC10148@ox> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 12:32:52 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Changing MTU on cxgbe From: Dustin Marquess To: "K. Macy" , Garrett Wollman , "dmarquess@gmail.com" , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 17:32:53 -0000 Okay, so ya, I'm stupid. The MTU won't change w/ ifconfig on the command line because of the lagg/bridge. The real issue seems to be ifconfig ordering, eg: ifconfig_cxgbe0="mtu 9000 toe4 toe6 up" Works ifconfig_cxgbe0="toe4 toe6 mtu 9000 up" Does NOT. So that's what was biting me in the butt. Sorry for the spam guys! -Dustin On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 2:29 AM, Navdeep Parhar wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:23:02AM -0700, K. Macy wrote: >> On Thursday, May 26, 2016, Navdeep Parhar wrote: >> >> > On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:57:34AM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: >> > > In article < >> > CAJpsHY4vF5Ky6GuAusLOOROgiQuyD2CcRmVxu8x3cArQRZxcbg@mail.gmail.com >> > > you write: >> > > >> > > ># ifconfig -m cxgbe0 >> > > >cxgbe0: flags=8943 >> > > >> > > ># ifconfig cxgbe0 mtu 9000 >> > > >ifconfig: ioctl SIOCSIFMTU (set mtu): Invalid argument >> > > >> > > I believe this device, like many others, does not allow the MTU (or >> > > actually the MRU) to be changed once the receive ring has been set up >> > >> > This is not correct. You can change the MTU of a cxgbe/cxl interface at >> > any time (whether it's up or down, passing traffic or idle, etc.). >> >> >> For some reason the stack needs init to be called when the MTU is changed >> for it to actually change the size of the packets passed to the driver. At >> least cxgb does not do that. I'm not at my computer right now, but cxgbe >> may be the same. If that's the case just up / down the interface. It _will_ >> take effect without that if it's passed at module load. > > The problem that was reported was that the ioctl that sets the MTU > failed, not that the ioctl succeeded but the MTU change did not take > effect. > > Regards, > Navdeep From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 19:02:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E288B4CEBA; Fri, 27 May 2016 19:02:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x235.google.com (mail-it0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 573F913A0; Fri, 27 May 2016 19:02:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x235.google.com with SMTP id e62so2096106ita.1; Fri, 27 May 2016 12:02:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to; bh=nJS2Je+3RDUc38YB+t6fvDpWhG/fxJJG5Cb7o3y4cJI=; b=q85oDAVOs28GrP3Sn0j/n/qISH9MgvVanY6CYdBxZ3p51JRDy2GuxY2J84jRg//U+S 3Bs/1r326ywQnodBPu05GkXgprgsnGg7pU/0qlpe+5pItoAWzqzaGqJWdnfYMP3rAyEe HHxsEPsaE0asoEV9GSpLbtzvVQtDODxft9ZtdAv6zwzpTw79sTz90bl7bXQKs0VO7OeH p4noT3np2SvEdNzXFjqzQes05iVFXQPfCRjx6EkV8kTFIsCJH0d/9UWx5xUq8QL0A7cs YkW5UDM7+Zo8QIx0ZfhaPj9H+qMnDF54+qmx3vU++6RPiahNjvZKUgxCWhX0k/vVNXrE BzxA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=nJS2Je+3RDUc38YB+t6fvDpWhG/fxJJG5Cb7o3y4cJI=; b=BJp9LHOhoa8pGknshtos2vyXFZw3Ma3aPCapa2o/0uStyoWn2vfm8tFdT+PutFEc69 dk/OO+P9HXe6qbIP46lhwW2JnfUHPIIYH3ZOm2LCD7BZaj8aZYeExRZcbd2Q/PcO0Ph6 I4N5mQ4uZF2sTlkLH8uf534IhPZmTGlrnnKaXP+dF7WO7rOeHFaKr6EqqgaPf4J2fa/D uxvttE/AHE84uLsZAWMsc949YNDosa9BJIAv5X9Mt7DDNL/X0Fc1I4dWdPvsVfpC5WK4 zW7tgQzM99lJ9V07AIBRQholiAzfIeJwBIvKB4pFau8h9IyZ/sNbv4XdqLtxABxSV96D z+HQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLO3RGM8DjYmocYF9IQ3UKqc6zgzW1eiGjw+0f1ProVp2ulEJaz4wNiEYdGOxOCFFXvAdWNlBq+Qiwz4A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.36.123.77 with SMTP id q74mr123759itc.44.1464375753778; Fri, 27 May 2016 12:02:33 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.20.70 with HTTP; Fri, 27 May 2016 12:02:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160527070901.GA7911@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> References: <20160519124446.GB2444@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160523034855.GA37797@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160524061707.GA77980@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160527070901.GA7911@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 12:02:33 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: eB2PKT8HHgolet4H_YlNQkQx0Z0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD From: Kevin Oberman To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , tinc@tinc-vpn.org, Mailinglists FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 19:02:34 -0000 On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff < niklaas@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> wrote: > Kevin Oberman [2016-05-26 21:11 -0700] : > > > The most valid use is when you can only get a /64 from your provider. > > I got a /112 for each of my virtual servers... So, I decided to go for > ULAs for the VPN between them. > This is fine, but why not use link-local for the VPN links? That's the primary reason for them. (N.B. I am not aware of your architectural details, and ULAs for the VPNs might be appropriate.) As long as they are properly allocated and statically routed, you can use a /112 or any other prefix length, just don't assume that they will work in any more global environment. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 19:30:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28851B4C7DD; Fri, 27 May 2016 19:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: from box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (box-fra-01.niklaas.eu [IPv6:2a00:c98:2200:af07:6::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69E019F2; Fri, 27 May 2016 19:30:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: by box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E769161FED; Fri, 27 May 2016 21:30:49 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 21:30:49 +0200 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , tinc@tinc-vpn.org Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD Message-ID: <20160527193049.GD11877@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , tinc@tinc-vpn.org References: <20160519124446.GB2444@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160523034855.GA37797@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160524061707.GA77980@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160527070901.GA7911@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WChQLJJJfbwij+9x" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 19:30:53 -0000 --WChQLJJJfbwij+9x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Kevin Oberman [2016-05-27 12:02 -0700] : > This is fine, but why not use link-local for the VPN links? That's the > primary reason for them. (N.B. I am not aware of your architectural > details, and ULAs for the VPNs might be appropriate.) Is it? I didn't know that I can use link-local addresses for the VPN too. How do I decide between link-local or unique-local addresses for the VPN? What do I make the decision dependent on? Niklaas --WChQLJJJfbwij+9x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXSKBjAAoJEG2fODeJrIU/k2UP+wc2+VwecVLCTJPgMZ/8dAUy IoD/SoQUG19UhKXH8ciPN44/HbioQ3pOUgqea9RbKxkvyrM48KhqhN9ElwoqHbrl S2gB4ktpeP1vdECaUS4VAXtG6i/RPf64QbruVqw30u1l5bSwEaYLUSkzWFlEKXqt NBOlUqOob8oNzwsuKRonkL+wDqeWtKINA1vlfgz/kB8W9JTQUtj2fh3ZBKkRGapq Pu5I/tSNMSEvmp7wGTficP3Xjy46CXyVg0mOaGU9KkUab/FaNVuYSvmJP1ytuCzU WGAXwmR71e2Mh5gl9JidNcv0x5uCMWoMQJz5jdDzi3MUHMMLOtEaSPRYlA9xvnxR apcfdOfn/3sQU2dCYVkPDvFjNEOoSoNU69d2P2AgS9ceUXD8lZxPIcZaB5MrYlR1 5w9kMQ3pSWh0vYXsYESNjiqYOvcwuPXX98Ri4EdSOAz2ksZ61XyApQxCjMaH1Y62 /0HQEsD6gSV9IzI7aIzDWiFim6N8JG8CDsBivfyi7K9bB3hSqCPbPEzVyj5Zt9qf +jduTDfl3mIlZwDPtOlEyi2mQytYxO5d3TpQ40nCqT1V2ew2AsWQO7rlvioLAz63 MfLyMc34EJt19Wr6apuGI0zu7QvFbltPIn8/pc+0I4aSumJwN5SmbjL/6imZQc3G ZrpVNLQ4pFalXlF+xr1j =jpwW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WChQLJJJfbwij+9x-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 21:15:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8323B4DCF6 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 21:15:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A938F1CBD for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 21:15:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4RLF4i5016987 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 21:15:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209758] Broadcom 5717 C not working Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 21:15:05 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: giulianosperandio@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 21:15:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209758 --- Comment #13 from Giuliano --- (In reply to Giuliano from comment #12) SOLVED. What I did: - I follow the steps showed in the link below (until the Step 3). https://github.com/freenas/freenas-build/wiki/FreeNAS-9.10---10-%E2%80%94-S= etting-up-a-FreeNAS-build-environment - Add the patch in the attachments cd /usr/src fetch -o - https://bz-attachments.freebsd.org/attachment.cgi?id=3D170681 | = patch -p1 - Do the remaining steps 4 and 5. I wish to thank Ngie Cooper, Sepherosa and Stephen -- otherwise I could not solve this problem. Best regards, Giuliano Sperandio --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 21:57:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7630CB4CC1C; Fri, 27 May 2016 21:57:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark.tinka@seacom.mu) Received: from the-host.seacom.mu (ge-0.ln-02-jnb.za.seacomnet.com [105.16.164.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B7EE1CF5; Fri, 27 May 2016 21:57:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark.tinka@seacom.mu) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=Mark-Tinkas-MacBook.local) by the-host.seacom.mu with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id O7UVO8-0004IS-D1; Fri, 27 May 2016 23:57:44 +0200 Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , tinc@tinc-vpn.org References: <20160519124446.GB2444@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160523034855.GA37797@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160524061707.GA77980@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160527070901.GA7911@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160527193049.GD11877@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> From: Mark Tinka Message-ID: <58c1e30b-a39f-3faf-2a7c-f3ab8cb42fed@seacom.mu> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 23:57:43 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160527193049.GD11877@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="arvkIRpGFkWk7fQieQBjHp5LqVo7ntFEA" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 21:57:50 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --arvkIRpGFkWk7fQieQBjHp5LqVo7ntFEA Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="r8ppCOoGSFvD6OIwJub8qAAId8C9NaH9u" From: Mark Tinka To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , tinc@tinc-vpn.org Message-ID: <58c1e30b-a39f-3faf-2a7c-f3ab8cb42fed@seacom.mu> Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD References: <20160519124446.GB2444@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160523034855.GA37797@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160524061707.GA77980@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160527070901.GA7911@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160527193049.GD11877@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> In-Reply-To: <20160527193049.GD11877@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> --r8ppCOoGSFvD6OIwJub8qAAId8C9NaH9u Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 27/May/16 21:30, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: > Is it? I didn't know that I can use link-local addresses for the VPN > too. How do I decide between link-local or unique-local addresses for > the VPN? What do I make the decision dependent on? Don't do it! For any service, use GUA's. Always. Mark. --r8ppCOoGSFvD6OIwJub8qAAId8C9NaH9u-- --arvkIRpGFkWk7fQieQBjHp5LqVo7ntFEA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXSMLYAAoJEGcZuYTeKm+GlTEP/0TkPz7SnT0MmvFYv3X0jJwA yDhkgbi0lCjLmBeR3g7j3DmK4tL6Zn1fNlttdW5pZDxdCr8PHHLMnexqTQUUX3ai xrscW0As5vMnBK5pMy5wL4qIj6blgolMjNAV+1jwTkBEfLSG0Gp1ByVCjMTh7RwJ umKng82UM25mQKeVI3HiwnM4kiXKaK2LqUbltBT6+HfofEzOZBkWI02uZrMlGcsg RAbPemVnXXETs9Vl/IxV0CbdkgnraH7xh+edJPiSm1yxBB3t6E5z1wJwNJflWSs+ wnQt+nNVfhzOXmlGtViulx8R9UHEHY3hjchPyZ9r+FvDk+D2nK0Y6Ty/Y9IevKg4 JXMYwvXauH6j8T/vC75YLK05ZA9vNctqqDlH/WDTVKLdt/DsBfDx975WRlpigVva xx2QIlWwBh/xv4iOD2Ch/DB9i2wKJ+TVR4jPZLDNdV2L0ttZC67sC++1Gll75vRq v5opqfrIr2m58L2TyPgRwZi3lZiMp6f6gfpfrGPP7yA1LxbnV/a87qXe0CyUJKNv xug2lpyuB8eovHp5qig8jRHbcAk1wHftRyo59XBHwLRtXF7drn/n5qKT867bzcu6 oq55ntKfFNDH+fToh3/HChzL7m9Xcl3h/7JePoXKJfC5+KClI6sw7FEhbMMoSrs3 ELd7i+GdoFP8LxEmpJJF =4l7b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --arvkIRpGFkWk7fQieQBjHp5LqVo7ntFEA-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Fri May 27 22:20:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453C2B4D196; Fri, 27 May 2016 22:20:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark.tinka@seacom.mu) Received: from the-host.seacom.mu (ge-0.ln-02-jnb.za.seacomnet.com [105.16.164.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE6BE199C; Fri, 27 May 2016 22:20:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark.tinka@seacom.mu) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=Mark-Tinkas-MacBook.local) by the-host.seacom.mu with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id O7UVN2-0004II-GZ; Fri, 27 May 2016 23:57:02 +0200 Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD To: Kevin Oberman , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , tinc@tinc-vpn.org, Mailinglists FreeBSD References: <20160519124446.GB2444@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160523034855.GA37797@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160524061707.GA77980@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160526193602.GF49239@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160527070901.GA7911@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> From: Mark Tinka Message-ID: Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 23:57:02 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 22:20:26 -0000 On 27/May/16 21:02, Kevin Oberman wrote: > This is fine, but why not use link-local for the VPN links? That's the > primary reason for them. That's really not good advice. I'd caution against using link-local addresses for any type of service. Link-local addresses are used for host-to-host communications on the same Layer 2 segment. Routers will not forward traffic with link-local addresses. Besides, link-local addresses are automatically created. They cannot be guaranteed to be unique anymore than they can be guaranteed to be constant. Mark. From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat May 28 03:26:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF10B4D1E6 for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 03:26:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C211183F for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 03:26:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u4S3QmgN046754 for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 03:26:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209758] Broadcom 5717 C not working Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 03:26:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: giulianosperandio@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 03:26:49 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209758 Giuliano changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |FIXED --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat May 28 06:38:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53191B4DFD3; Sat, 28 May 2016 06:38:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: from box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (box-fra-01.niklaas.eu [IPv6:2a00:c98:2200:af07:6::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4051F0F; Sat, 28 May 2016 06:38:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: by box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1717161FEC; Sat, 28 May 2016 08:38:13 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 08:38:13 +0200 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , tinc@tinc-vpn.org, Mailinglists FreeBSD Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD Message-ID: <20160528063813.GE11877@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> Mail-Followup-To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , tinc@tinc-vpn.org, Mailinglists FreeBSD MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FN+gV9K+162wdwwF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <58c1e30b-a39f-3faf-2a7c-f3ab8cb42fed@seacom.mu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 06:38:16 -0000 --FN+gV9K+162wdwwF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark Tinka [2016-05-27 23:57 +0200] : > On 27/May/16 21:02, Kevin Oberman wrote: >=20 > > This is fine, but why not use link-local for the VPN links? That's > > the primary reason for them. >=20 > That's really not good advice. >=20 > I'd caution against using link-local addresses for any type of > service. >=20 > Link-local addresses are used for host-to-host communications on the > same Layer 2 segment. Routers will not forward traffic with link-local > addresses. >=20 > Besides, link-local addresses are automatically created. They cannot > be guaranteed to be unique anymore than they can be guaranteed to be > constant. Thanks for repeating that. That's how I understood it as a novice too. :-) And that's why I thought I should not go for them. Because I don't have many GUAs available, I thought I should go for ULAs then. Niklaas --FN+gV9K+162wdwwF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXSTzJAAoJEG2fODeJrIU/VogP/2fP2bq+FbsdyA/IcYSIQMgT psqrrMs7G/9CfS8CDSNI44PCe1Ja7ugk6P18W4gYH7t2ZLNaDABdz7NCThYQed1p 0bhVUFaZWyGvDmZV5H8CfAzZmJSyM5ikhfIUmw/rhRo8UfsWBIzNANOhBu739zrH 6Mmmb+tr3ToA35l+dmh0oR8+MHF80dbGnZ6Fj5id2R4aWVea2W2HhWCAoXX3sS2L uUGyXcdPaS63Y8G4p02v4uwSk7SrBEVMluDOi2d0Ds7aKAqYo0GcXfx9Llb/NruD DYYhgSlVeXqPMMNeaxCXHCJ2iWKoGqNulCoZmYlpTrP4w6J3POH4OoUtWa3MrP4r 0hf5ZuQKYt2wJSdkj3qlMq6utRT6IVT69hlB85aFpPRPFiFmMkRmfqyiye5I1jDB 7Qrrwi91IFNkbZLzy+u6LMEbcbwwdFxYJzOZcamC3VvLN2pNXZRg8HNJ/MsLAOP/ Vjk2QfD/pIaGDLiVn44jYBRC22EulWVYbTXhGc8DTZjaCiIMokZwJKH18AuFUf+N 4h83atlXQ6G8RmObptqiJPlsUUIunY7Qj/CuihMCekdtP73+mDrnfiGolwsVFor2 4b7KCvi2BSPDmTmFsgeIhkSrfVFTQinGSL7cf+HsRkAx8OiGlfxODhTspTmyzex7 xhKWZoGNhjnHpVsGaCHn =05TO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FN+gV9K+162wdwwF-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat May 28 07:19:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF8BB4D7E1 for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 07:19:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F8541D4E for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 07:19:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5B0D3B4D7E0; Sat, 28 May 2016 07:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586EDB4D7DE for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 07:19:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail104.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail104.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.246]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C511D4D for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 07:19:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from c122-106-149-109.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au (c122-106-149-109.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.149.109]) by mail104.syd.optusnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6085C427114 for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 17:19:18 +1000 (AEST) Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 17:19:17 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org To: net@freebsd.org Subject: ifconfig creates a bogus(?) route Message-ID: <20160528154122.C1843@besplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Optus-CM-Score: 0 X-Optus-CM-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=c+ZWOkJl c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=R/f3m204ZbWUO/0rwPSMPw==:117 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=n-5BTmeRK2mygF_K7vIA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 07:19:28 -0000 Sometime between r191220 and r201220, ifconfig started creating a bogus(?) static route. The following is under r248255 with "ifconfig em0 inet 192.168.2.8" (where 192.168.2.8 is for the local host and I don't bother typing the netmsk) done before bringing up lo0: Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire 192.168.2.0/24 link#1 U 0 0 em0 192.168.2.8 link#1 UHS 0 0 lo0 The bogus(?) route points to itself (route get shows this more clearly), and doesn't work. I know little about routiing, but can fix things like this manually. Simply "route delete" on the bogus(?) route works in this case. An alias for lo0 also works. Netif is lo0 although lo0 is not up yet. Normally lo0 is brought up before em0. This makes no obvious difference, but then bringing up lo0 again removes the bogus(?) route. The order em0, lo0, lo0 doesn't remove the bogus(?) route. After the bogus(?) route is removed, netstat -r[n] stops showing any route except in old versions of FreeBSD it does show it as something like "192.168.2.8 UHLW 0 em0 " after using it. (I use many different kernel versions and only a 1 userland version except for utilities like netstat whose ABI keeps breaking, and haven't found newer version of netstat and/or flags on it to show all the details.) Similary for other local machines. After the bogus(?) route is removed, route get 192.168.2.8 shows a working route even before it is used. The main differences are that the destination changes from 192.168.2.8 (self) to 192.168.2.0 (link) and the interface changes from em0 to if0. That actually seems more bogus -- it will have to be translated back to the "bogus(?) route to work. How is this supposed to work? freefall seems to have the bogus(?) route, but it works. Routing utilities seem to be broken on ref11-i386 (route can't even find localhost). Bruce From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat May 28 12:11:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D9AB4C87B; Sat, 28 May 2016 12:11:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark.tinka@seacom.mu) Received: from the-host.seacom.mu (ge-0.ln-02-jnb.za.seacomnet.com [105.16.164.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CC45122A; Sat, 28 May 2016 12:11:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark.tinka@seacom.mu) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=Mark-Tinkas-MacBook.local) by the-host.seacom.mu with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id O7VZ7C-00054M-AK; Sat, 28 May 2016 14:11:36 +0200 Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , tinc@tinc-vpn.org, Mailinglists FreeBSD References: <20160528063813.GE11877@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> From: Mark Tinka Message-ID: Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 14:11:35 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160528063813.GE11877@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CJTbPUaw9IcJkqFDbTUTKA89SILulpF9W" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 12:11:44 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --CJTbPUaw9IcJkqFDbTUTKA89SILulpF9W Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="pBg6uaqjDOar3F3DsdoT27PPKA01H7I2O" From: Mark Tinka To: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , tinc@tinc-vpn.org, Mailinglists FreeBSD Message-ID: Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD References: <20160528063813.GE11877@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> In-Reply-To: <20160528063813.GE11877@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> --pBg6uaqjDOar3F3DsdoT27PPKA01H7I2O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 28/May/16 08:38, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: > Thanks for repeating that. That's how I understood it as a novice too. > :-) And that's why I thought I should not go for them. Because I don't > have many GUAs available, I thought I should go for ULAs then. Why don't you have GUA IPv6 address space? Your ISP should be able to assign you a /48 or /56 prefix for you to use on your LAN. That's more than plenty of space. Mark. --pBg6uaqjDOar3F3DsdoT27PPKA01H7I2O-- --CJTbPUaw9IcJkqFDbTUTKA89SILulpF9W Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXSYr4AAoJEGcZuYTeKm+GoeEP/3DzD2wCMXSnWqqEQXUH5mec g7Iiw5nq4Hci0YVpOLuQ4WaE7afXJJk6RthaI8NHYNQL6km3wlbboz5EzG2dcKZL IDzr5eD0Aj7So5Ve7t0Y8KS8QHxFS2scu0B5qBXXQi60kcajfQryxIFcHzAFrgem SiQ/7GUwgNFa733YACh9EKe5grRLDTEg0lXgdo7s7ApXNgZAaduELX3sAH/SqEGA WUpyWew/jTcqnxRDV+yu5AM3FxdfR1thQ9FHT5oSEtCKCosykPuEn+D3KZ7kJKX4 9Rjnqx6tuWAU6jfEyl/BXzbjSFp1Cv0d8L+Qk4tlIspyVW1Y4IYPAKEDw4dLHnTN PgGT4GgdyZtH3/4iEjcNwP1cTXyMFBUim8SHcqcZPJSikAgndA4TSrb3O7CCoUzp y32u5V/QCFsfXemDH4tb+gd2WiDx4ZHLgfDBNnvZGLuU3EecCmO06mTlKApdkxKN aKQElQzcX2aWQQHXQqvtGFXH119fiQk5DtgdD4JjV7uDbe72yavtx1Qruv0UxGAp ksvaE6XzbBCSUSorcLlwewO1yp1uT2x2/UtF18f1V9WFZfwEpuSmfhrmbvE0vwn3 3rwkLORCvsENvqTnfkMg8rMfd3Vjx7CgHFXXRwWpChxfQN7uallEZZ2pELo3aHfz dK0T5RKJebDrxJmb4fzD =6Aaq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CJTbPUaw9IcJkqFDbTUTKA89SILulpF9W-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat May 28 15:48:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 542EBB4E926 for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 15:48:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ddesimone@verio.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1021E64 for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 15:48:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ddesimone@verio.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 26B7FB4E925; Sat, 28 May 2016 15:48:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26611B4E924 for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 15:48:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ddesimone@verio.net) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0062.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C64951E63 for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 15:48:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ddesimone@verio.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=verioit.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-verio-net; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=RCbfWg7n4R5NksBfO6JsrFMIyqMei21v2hLZm7ztH2o=; b=g144ERRHZo5LykXTBv3fV7uRZHDEll4Gohgd9Pu2kyuEDWHdWHkJMp4EURDLnm0pP9SbybPjJKHVVQmDQ1ggH64sf/T6yMxkhvJV8SSSe4ZLDqjJKM5lIFequ4cU3tbANrQqJAtoRW3dkzCADNTdZk83mqwcyZnUMH30+LBaSEc= Received: from SN1PR08MB1821.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.162.134.27) by SN1PR08MB1822.namprd08.prod.outlook.com (10.162.134.28) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.506.2; Sat, 28 May 2016 15:48:34 +0000 Received: from SN1PR08MB1821.namprd08.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.134.27]) by SN1PR08MB1821.namprd08.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.134.27]) with mapi id 15.01.0506.011; Sat, 28 May 2016 15:48:34 +0000 From: David DeSimone To: Bruce Evans CC: "net@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: ifconfig creates a bogus(?) route Thread-Topic: ifconfig creates a bogus(?) route Thread-Index: AQHRuLFMF5We0vuhzUGy08H3Fj8zKJ/OfgJQ Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 15:48:34 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20160528154122.C1843@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: <20160528154122.C1843@besplex.bde.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: optusnet.com.au; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;optusnet.com.au; dmarc=none action=none header.from=verio.net; x-originating-ip: [173.71.11.10] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 4cd68d7e-8664-470a-b574-08d3870f8703 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN1PR08MB1822; 5:k9TypqJM62TlvZJFL+U8siilc+Ft90Evm9nP8QGohoel1nw0y9E9SwcJnLCz6XAws5xbhTviVnrfOhK/+Y0Fuog93nRxDO/LBS8ePeKBSqm+jBHeypGU/clsoPzLMXGbuVIxBIG6bG3Td1ZN1Zo9tw==; 24:WnTbNW5cc2tQPB/hiS/Avnt4o/98FBlt2SxdgWVKPXM/QaILX+8SjZKggwlmika4H54ocjGNp1K7GUlU8soXVRbdKnmdbVsBXD2cX7j9bek=; 7:9FilAJggZlsE9e4wSf52FlEetPgZoKgVet0SY51Fe2GREAvyZqundWIeBSp7n/MMF86Z0+xEkaYg42UAMfpapXu9w9Hc3psmH2VAd5AVYnE59XvFfg2Zo0E7LbxCoMf2S+e9L72jS/cUIQtVs2ykhdpzrzSASRkS7qV7Qvo8OLYWLuRiXkYSQWpMDOupCPKf x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN1PR08MB1822; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(242903309895634)(104828721160424); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001); SRVR:SN1PR08MB1822; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN1PR08MB1822; x-forefront-prvs: 09565527D6 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(24454002)(3846002)(6116002)(102836003)(1220700001)(586003)(2950100001)(77096005)(5008740100001)(81166006)(106116001)(74316001)(8936002)(8676002)(87936001)(189998001)(92566002)(33656002)(110136002)(76176999)(50986999)(2906002)(66066001)(11100500001)(99286002)(9686002)(86362001)(5002640100001)(4326007)(54356999)(122556002)(19580395003)(10400500002)(5890100001)(19580405001)(5003600100002)(3660700001)(3280700002)(5004730100002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:SN1PR08MB1822; H:SN1PR08MB1821.namprd08.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: verio.net X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 May 2016 15:48:34.3954 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 281c3918-264a-4db4-ab20-2dafa1dca324 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1PR08MB1822 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 15:48:46 -0000 Bruce Evans wrote: > Sometime between r191220 and r201220, ifconfig started creating a bogus(?= ) static route. > The following is under r248255 with "ifconfig em0 inet 192.168.2.8" (wher= e 192.168.2.8 is > for the local host and I don't bother typing the netmsk) done before brin= ging up lo0: > > Routing tables > > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expir= e > 192.168.2.0/24 link#1 U 0 0 em0 > 192.168.2.8 link#1 UHS 0 0 lo0 Why do you feel the route is bogus? Is it because it has a netmask? If you don't supply a netmask, ifconfig will assume one based on the "class= " (A, B, C) of the IP you've supplied. 192.168.2.8 is a Class C address an= d gets a /24 netmask by default. > The bogus(?) route points to itself (route get shows this more clearly), = and doesn't work. > I know little about routiing, but can > fix things like this manually. S= imply "route delete" > on the bogus(?) route works in this case. An alias for lo0 also works. In router parlance, the route would be called a "connected" route, showing = that not only do you have an IP on the subnet, but by virtue of the netmask= , you are "connected" to every other IP in the same subnet range, through t= hat interface. It will cause your system to send ARP requests through that= interface for any other IP in the range, in order to communicate with them= . -- David DeSimone Professional Services Design Engineer at NTT America ________________________________ This email message is intended for the use of the person to whom it has bee= n sent, and may contain information that is confidential or legally protect= ed. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in = error, you are not authorized to copy, distribute, or otherwise use this me= ssage or its attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by return e-= mail and permanently delete this message and any attachments. makes no warr= anty that this email is error or virus free. Thank you. ________________________________ This email message is intended for the use of the person to whom it has bee= n sent, and may contain information that is confidential or legally protect= ed. If you are not the intended recipient or have received this message in = error, you are not authorized to copy, distribute, or otherwise use this me= ssage or its attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by return e-= mail and permanently delete this message and any attachments. NTT America m= akes no warranty that this email is error or virus free. Thank you. ________________________________ From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat May 28 18:40:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4FA5B4EA50; Sat, 28 May 2016 18:40:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: from box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (box-fra-01.niklaas.eu [46.165.253.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77449141A; Sat, 28 May 2016 18:40:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stdin@niklaas.eu) Received: by box-fra-01.niklaas.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E104661FEC; Sat, 28 May 2016 20:40:27 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 20:40:27 +0200 From: Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, tinc@tinc-vpn.org, Mailinglists FreeBSD Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD Message-ID: <20160528184027.GF11877@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, tinc@tinc-vpn.org, Mailinglists FreeBSD References: <20160528063813.GE11877@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Il7n/DHsA0sMLmDu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 18:40:37 -0000 --Il7n/DHsA0sMLmDu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mark Tinka [2016-05-28 14:11 +0200] : > Why don't you have GUA IPv6 address space? >=20 > Your ISP should be able to assign you a /48 or /56 prefix for you to > use on your LAN. That's more than plenty of space. As I wrote, I only got a /112 form my ISP. This still exceeds the amount of addresses that I need but I decided to go for ULAs for flexibility. Anyway, it's working. :-) Niklaas --Il7n/DHsA0sMLmDu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXSeYGAAoJEG2fODeJrIU/TtAP/0jg9kl2gPSROVGzupJRS2nz 8OS79jYMpRtflCsY91D9k5HGvtSBrPVes3DmiZsZvRU9nrFeQumxNRvRHrd8Bp5K AUNpSXJGER6QBnzUX+C/g/fh1GVYWk3ahE9FkC5WMYqqQ4mESNyb0XReiHKPpTdg sLSLIL9eefNlVawj1NmRR6JIF43uHOrzSKSIoFr6xOFeQ/CuBQOdA07YHFzsdqEr 9zAETfS4+GKNYJ6QVJUAcDBFtRpt7dA4RJr2wnF1WQ7AQjVWuPeGfxVRfqabSZnv YMX7wvUWoOyqSC1ajPhqqlcW/1Npm5qsc1isq/AUt/g8p/cQ5mvtWWwkJo4rDxBb 4o0zQ5k05NLCmsrlrmSlSzdO0bdD6DDrqmtAXU8W4+xV8RaXAk+UvTJqKHAB4aZS ou0ub9aVE1T6YraaraN2GL0miqdB4NFd9q/1T5H3rONSX2DPgS0ZX3+B1+eACv9k zQNgro6HOA0b8gASARPXAPollszhEpSrANiNbpge2kmaXQwuoZLgb83YQvHFNLrp nLoqODFQRNvtvzpbz7WuS0mbwxBZJqjoez1nV1BkFWLxeMIc/UwDDi9XJAkUTChn AEq5a9zK2/3An5QQov6SnPJt5rKMNS6AjVWkceGla0yBWhorsJLrXZz4V+Qyn7Zt NzR0ay6VQTG23+Hs/HCO =B9gA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Il7n/DHsA0sMLmDu-- From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat May 28 18:55:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7198EB4EFDF for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 18:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpaasial@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5504312BD for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 18:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpaasial@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 543B9B4EFDE; Sat, 28 May 2016 18:55:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E66B4EFDC for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 18:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpaasial@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x22a.google.com (mail-oi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D41712BC for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 18:55:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpaasial@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id w184so212591654oiw.2 for ; Sat, 28 May 2016 11:55:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=0ZCfshdlvCRLKJQwrAS8DkyyH+HArCk2ke6g0co0c2U=; b=NXBlq05XsNOsTX8LNAP+l2kd1mad2y+0Ctxfzg8CmE2CPk1PSTTL60TjItEbIAubKs y2B9L2TMzHdSue8zAk3BZNP3uVGZCwIU0J7VzO4ulICnXOiCuMgYaaTSEhWdumrZnN0Z 4snt5V2RJvhI9iCMVIf6H7yUGIaXV5p+W/limzmDQ9X163+fUxay/dXbuQ8HF7LC3Rml lP1THTYPYt5XdB3XvRbyxZe0WC4QycSEKrQMjgStXu0mfEXzCY+KIp5N19AyGVLagRVo k3jccsaGooCxaGS5gP/rUvNV2o4b7ygK20zYRFsY58xZkdg0HVKqEtDPBhwEgWGzwv5e bjUA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=0ZCfshdlvCRLKJQwrAS8DkyyH+HArCk2ke6g0co0c2U=; b=mhFopB9QlAtko7k5eSYyHjvgJm0Cfm8ML6o5D1Q4bjlMIheRpDmK31hQnuDzXDJZAx a8CHorbBXGP7Riwvz65UKrygVeQ2Pq8PHY8tg68sNXh1blyb+hZFHdRcVSaTSVOhvihD 1OSz9c4q9qMaEFGibqcJPSSmzEEfOAjeQ33MfFDgtlJ/NK7nKtkOawb4Iz0Qv1r9w60A IljgXyVfSO1aKgqtTbZnMKepuyypXIgQPoSHfqwNjfIO1/Xb70XMQt2SOt/KNkbkNsYx xHNTtx5/a+ekozLaCxPBWG5O/VHC7LOrG2VEtwTlkERrPK2JVbMcqRbwknMCsVAoVTZU oBdw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLn2q51VJHEz0cJfMr2WnbylU0K6JREmJKvT6PSVZpzRLa+EnzkLKQNzivr9PyYrqxjcdvQqIlP3JaMCg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.77.216 with SMTP id a207mr1724728oib.46.1464461729272; Sat, 28 May 2016 11:55:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.157.45.234 with HTTP; Sat, 28 May 2016 11:55:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160528154122.C1843@besplex.bde.org> References: <20160528154122.C1843@besplex.bde.org> Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 21:55:29 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ifconfig creates a bogus(?) route From: Kimmo Paasiala To: Bruce Evans Cc: "net@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 18:55:30 -0000 On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Bruce Evans wrote: > Sometime between r191220 and r201220, ifconfig started creating a bogus(?) > static route. The following is under r248255 with > "ifconfig em0 inet 192.168.2.8" (where 192.168.2.8 is for the local host > and I don't bother typing the netmsk) done before bringing up lo0: > > Routing tables > > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire > 192.168.2.0/24 link#1 U 0 0 em0 > 192.168.2.8 link#1 UHS 0 0 lo0 > > The bogus(?) route points to itself (route get shows this more clearly), > and doesn't work. I know little about routiing, but can fix things like > this manually. Simply "route delete" on the bogus(?) route works in this > case. An alias for lo0 also works. > > Netif is lo0 although lo0 is not up yet. Normally lo0 is brought up before > em0. This makes no obvious difference, but then bringing up lo0 again > removes the bogus(?) route. The order em0, lo0, lo0 doesn't remove the > bogus(?) route. > > After the bogus(?) route is removed, netstat -r[n] stops showing any route > except in old versions of FreeBSD it does show it as something like > "192.168.2.8 UHLW 0 em0 " after using it. > (I use many different kernel versions and only a 1 userland version > except for utilities like netstat whose ABI keeps breaking, and > haven't found newer version of netstat and/or flags on it to show > all the details.) Similary for other local machines. > > After the bogus(?) route is removed, route get 192.168.2.8 shows a working > route even before it is used. The main differences are that the > destination changes from 192.168.2.8 (self) to 192.168.2.0 (link) and > the interface changes from em0 to if0. That actually seems more bogus -- > it will have to be translated back to the "bogus(?) route to work. > > How is this supposed to work? freefall seems to have the bogus(?) route, > but it works. Routing utilities seem to be broken on ref11-i386 > (route can't even find localhost). > > Bruce As far as I know there's nothing wrong with those two routes. They are both needed to allow local connections to the address bound on the interface to be sourced from the localhost 127.0.0.1 address and traffic leaving the system via the interface to be sourced from the address bound on the interface. Someone correct me if I'm off with the details. -Kimmo From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat May 28 19:09:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28499B4E2EF; Sat, 28 May 2016 19:09:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark.tinka@seacom.mu) Received: from the-host.seacom.mu (ge-0.ln-02-jnb.za.seacomnet.com [105.16.164.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B72271A90; Sat, 28 May 2016 19:09:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark.tinka@seacom.mu) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=Mark-Tinkas-MacBook.local) by the-host.seacom.mu with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id O7WIJP-0005J9-69; Sat, 28 May 2016 21:09:25 +0200 Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, tinc@tinc-vpn.org, Mailinglists FreeBSD References: <20160528063813.GE11877@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160528184027.GF11877@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> From: Mark Tinka Message-ID: <4b54c59e-5ae4-ef44-d11d-9809772fd4ac@seacom.mu> Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 21:09:24 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160528184027.GF11877@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JLdcjnq7GeJgJ5bp0aXM5mg2e8hx4avCv" X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 May 2016 19:09:31 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --JLdcjnq7GeJgJ5bp0aXM5mg2e8hx4avCv Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="dklMlUfPO2SIx195RtmNXlRPfN504AiH8" From: Mark Tinka To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, tinc@tinc-vpn.org, Mailinglists FreeBSD Message-ID: <4b54c59e-5ae4-ef44-d11d-9809772fd4ac@seacom.mu> Subject: Re: IPv6, ULAs and FreeBSD References: <20160528063813.GE11877@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> <20160528184027.GF11877@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> In-Reply-To: <20160528184027.GF11877@box-fra-01.niklaas.eu> --dklMlUfPO2SIx195RtmNXlRPfN504AiH8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 28/May/16 20:40, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: > As I wrote, I only got a /112 form my ISP. This still exceeds the amoun= t > of addresses that I need but I decided to go for ULAs for flexibility. > > Anyway, it's working. :-) I'd suggest going back to your ISP and asking for at least a /56. If they don't want to give you this, time to look for another ISP. Mark. --dklMlUfPO2SIx195RtmNXlRPfN504AiH8-- --JLdcjnq7GeJgJ5bp0aXM5mg2e8hx4avCv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXSezlAAoJEGcZuYTeKm+G2f4QAIczw3FepZ/p3K7KkWyX2ax2 IK0Z5yKSNuFssAMbLUAhJTLpac89fFyQoVZ4RDQjL8fb1BqmzYPlz3ve+SoEGmPN RnnvLALutW8G6PtILGxgXgLZwjMEb5DBtmMnlJyPbPPhTDHsm23pgDaTOQ2rO7rr GKWxVv7cn0rd1XBcHdgK1NaTIuejmJaJ7Uc6hdwvq737HsX4jcbamCQp5VSPDplm jrw6lgW3dAUgRJghETupTx8p+X9Ajn5Ha4YBZYRMsrkGxaZIWmQDN/DhdCgKdWW6 wLYAmzpOKYfW3DZBzbzwTiO85VaJPk5NUtSMqvd9cHzmMMhPH1NSww30pYnjoWzo iOKQ9INsFE65ewhoEbckVRsPqzrepj02UP8hdQtV9iNvb8SdqbhSXwja/IUnggMa u7IWHMGlfK5FIG9AJVTqxHQwHYgAneUxer/yOwtYjjXD7KCWiJiC7ItvHVwizhL6 gM3h8hd7FSAb7qumpPQvgrk7HwDMxxTSnR8fcDyFrCdV0gr9QJ9A8bs+7AYLg/bz nDswZMITZT9IiOKHpxKVgtrFEEK0/fcHCAxWdpZtpvCqjKOoy7GFM2eNGOLDTyEv xyY+T3BHB2lCh4OItZCfMCVjKrdD/zWcJPPJ8MAdWpqbVjm0NwZVDT+qvURigjPJ LgVUEcDMW7W/GVMKvXW+ =c07Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JLdcjnq7GeJgJ5bp0aXM5mg2e8hx4avCv--