From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Dec 18 14:56:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECCAC87A34 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from francesco.scaglione@sfr.fr) Received: from smtp26.services.sfr.fr (smtp26.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B1C6EEB for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:56:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from francesco.scaglione@sfr.fr) Received: from Stream (unknown [88.191.55.99]) by msfrf2628.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 8F3521C000407 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 15:46:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from Stream (unknown [88.191.55.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: scaglione.francesco@neuf.fr) by msfrf2628.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTPSA for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 15:46:43 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: sfr.fr; auth=pass (LOGIN) smtp.auth=scaglione.francesco@neuf.fr Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 15:46:43 +0100 From: francesco scaglione To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Pkg problem after upgrading from 9.3 to 10.3 Message-ID: <20161218154643.106f91f2@Stream> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-sfr-mailing: LEGIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:56:53 -0000 After the upgrade (done following with care the Handbook) I get this error: # pkg update Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... pkg: http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:10:amd64/latest/meta.txz: No address record repository FreeBSD has no meta file, using default settings pkg: http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:10:amd64/latest/packagesite.txz: No address record Unable to update repository FreeBSD These are my two FreeBSD.conf (I guess only the second one is used): # cat pkg/FreeBSD.conf # $FreeBSD: releng/10.3/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf 296373 2016-03-04 01:27:38Z marius $ # # To disable this repository, instead of modifying or removing this file, # create a /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf file: # # mkdir -p /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos # echo "FreeBSD: { enabled: no }" > /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf # FreeBSD: { url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/quarterly", mirror_type: "srv", signature_type: "fingerprints", fingerprints: "/usr/share/keys/pkg", enabled: yes } --- # cat /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf FreeBSD: { url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/latest", mirror_type: "srv", enabled: yes } --- I've read that on 10.3 the "Quarterly" repo is the default, isn't? Should I delete the /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf file and try again? Thank you very much for your help, Francesco From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Dec 18 17:06:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D33BC87354 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:06:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4ea:bd49:619b:6cb3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB7A898A for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:06:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:1c1d:86a1:a200:b700]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6973A15B for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:06:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/D6973A15B; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Pkg problem after upgrading from 9.3 to 10.3 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20161218154643.106f91f2@Stream> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <55bca76f-bff9-d528-1096-1f5b7594c8c3@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:06:29 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161218154643.106f91f2@Stream> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k6BS8LXQXReNcc6ASe0lNs28saM9KnTX7" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:06:35 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --k6BS8LXQXReNcc6ASe0lNs28saM9KnTX7 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="OnxiFJREO5l4E1DXnTQ7NExqPfOb06abo"; protected-headers="v1" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <55bca76f-bff9-d528-1096-1f5b7594c8c3@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Pkg problem after upgrading from 9.3 to 10.3 References: <20161218154643.106f91f2@Stream> In-Reply-To: <20161218154643.106f91f2@Stream> --OnxiFJREO5l4E1DXnTQ7NExqPfOb06abo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18/12/2016 14:46, francesco scaglione wrote: > After the upgrade (done following with care the Handbook) I get this > error: >=20 > # pkg update > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > pkg: http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:10:amd64/latest/meta.txz: No > address record > repository FreeBSD has no meta file, using default settings > pkg: http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:10:amd64/latest/packagesite.txz: No= > address record > Unable to update repository FreeBSD This sounds like a problem with the DNS -- although why should this affect you after upgrading to 10.x? Did you switch to enabling the local_unbound service when you upgraded? What does this DNS query return for you? % dig IN SRV _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org That should give you a list of download sites with 'pkgmir.geo.freebsd.org' marked as the highest priority. Connecting to this repo by name will automatically direct you to the closest package mirror to your location. That's pkg0.bme.freebsd.org for people in Europ= e. > These are my two FreeBSD.conf (I guess only the second one is used): >=20 > # cat pkg/FreeBSD.conf > # $FreeBSD: releng/10.3/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf 296373 2016-03-04 > 01:27:38Z marius $ > # > # To disable this repository, instead of modifying or removing this > file, > # create a /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf file: > # > # mkdir -p /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos > # echo "FreeBSD: { enabled: no }" >> /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf > # >=20 > FreeBSD: { > url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/quarterly", > mirror_type: "srv", > signature_type: "fingerprints", > fingerprints: "/usr/share/keys/pkg", > enabled: yes > } > --- > # cat /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf=20 > FreeBSD: { > url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/latest", > mirror_type: "srv", > enabled: yes > } > --- >=20 > I've read that on 10.3 the "Quarterly" repo is the default, isn't? > Should I delete the /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf file and try > again? The quarterly repo is the default nowadays, but you can certainly use the latest package set if you want to. Using quarterly vs latest shouldn't have any bearing on the problems you're experiencing though. Due to the way pkg.conf(5) works, if you have a /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/anything.conf that defines a 'FreeBSD' tag -- this will be merged with the settings from /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf. You can see what the resulting configuration is by running 'pkg -vv' Cheers, Matthew --OnxiFJREO5l4E1DXnTQ7NExqPfOb06abo-- --k6BS8LXQXReNcc6ASe0lNs28saM9KnTX7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYVsIVXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkAT3YoQAI77wbiPOYR+oKd63iKL0JXC aVkJe0g0hjOlMTM1iEtRJnM4VMBS0RV4+86RjBTdiHC4c3MLUTa8PpSKSFZsx+wA xGaFeubViu+FKkzpwBSLD3qHFX0AOZtGiJJgwVilMDyvi/ldCeaFhcfktcDs9JtG mdqh9jCKqmDIO2aaqImYSuDBLw07RjbMtPwB1uW2nwCl6FuIuDvE2ZhnMookSE5l f/hEN1VOoJ0zZBrwzBHiVtSZSECHLOPeT2Tx6m0UczkfJujbICTUuPeNTZ8qPXzr 8XqJ20oWC7FfmVuuz3RUyXH2irXvvCR8jL4p40UqFf79oRjRGCn0m2/hK+kIjU2s Mms4uUqEji8fd3CXw+PwtXSqJAb26AViLMIR039LXZ/n2ub8mFZqiCAVVmBKbZC4 UO+xe+VrpdQP58MNUIFEBoSDF7AjarIUPckKuUwKa0tQ3g1qbRuMXH0I3TePcS4o r5L3ltvuCzOrFSZQXal38nqinVKsDJW8YEuGtMqh2LddQFFedZMtVO8NbiPv8O70 9F7CiwlohD3RGmU5nvYHjCSjl2bXiKN8zqY/AoDp9CAvV9a1SFZjPwnIy2qnZ+p7 3AcqZKfbz1LKKZKAawb2Ep34OGpkck/JmeziOumoNmpCNlJmdxNifMuf/6ynF5sT VikNVSsUg7h81qJZmAtt =Rm70 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k6BS8LXQXReNcc6ASe0lNs28saM9KnTX7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Dec 18 17:36:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DB4C85283 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:36:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from francesco.scaglione@sfr.fr) Received: from smtp26.services.sfr.fr (smtp26.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFEF8C85 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from francesco.scaglione@sfr.fr) Received: from Stream (unknown [88.191.55.99]) by msfrf2620.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1F72A1C000432 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:30:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from Stream (unknown [88.191.55.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: scaglione.francesco@neuf.fr) by msfrf2620.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTPSA for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:30:58 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: sfr.fr; auth=pass (LOGIN) smtp.auth=scaglione.francesco@neuf.fr Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:30:41 +0100 From: francesco scaglione To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pkg problem after upgrading from 9.3 to 10.3 Message-ID: <20161218183041.77f47019@Stream> In-Reply-To: <55bca76f-bff9-d528-1096-1f5b7594c8c3@FreeBSD.org> References: <20161218154643.106f91f2@Stream> <55bca76f-bff9-d528-1096-1f5b7594c8c3@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-sfr-mailing: LEGIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:36:53 -0000 On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:06:29 +0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 18/12/2016 14:46, francesco scaglione wrote: > > After the upgrade (done following with care the Handbook) I get this > > error: > > > > # pkg update > > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > > pkg: http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:10:amd64/latest/meta.txz: No > > address record > > repository FreeBSD has no meta file, using default settings > > pkg: > > http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:10:amd64/latest/packagesite.txz: No > > address record Unable to update repository FreeBSD > > This sounds like a problem with the DNS -- although why should this > affect you after upgrading to 10.x? Did you switch to enabling the > local_unbound service when you upgraded? Uhm, I don't think so... I just answered "y" to a few "does this look reasonable to you" questions. How could I check this? > What does this DNS query return for you? > > % dig IN SRV _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org > > That should give you a list of download sites with > 'pkgmir.geo.freebsd.org' marked as the highest priority. Connecting > to this repo by name will automatically direct you to the closest > package mirror to your location. That's pkg0.bme.freebsd.org for > people in Europe. Right, I've tried first with dig: $ dig IN SRV _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org dig: not found and then with drill: $ drill IN SRV _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org Warning: Could not create a resolver structure: Could not open the files ((null)) Try drill @localhost if you have a resolver running on your machine. > > These are my two FreeBSD.conf (I guess only the second one is used): > > > > # cat pkg/FreeBSD.conf > > # $FreeBSD: releng/10.3/etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf 296373 2016-03-04 > > 01:27:38Z marius $ > > # > > # To disable this repository, instead of modifying or removing this > > file, > > # create a /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf file: > > # > > # mkdir -p /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos > > # echo "FreeBSD: { enabled: no }" > >> /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf > > # > > > > FreeBSD: { > > url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/quarterly", > > mirror_type: "srv", > > signature_type: "fingerprints", > > fingerprints: "/usr/share/keys/pkg", > > enabled: yes > > } > > --- > > # cat /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf > > FreeBSD: { > > url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/latest", > > mirror_type: "srv", > > enabled: yes > > } > > --- > > > > I've read that on 10.3 the "Quarterly" repo is the default, isn't? > > Should I delete the /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf file and > > try again? > > The quarterly repo is the default nowadays, but you can certainly use > the latest package set if you want to. Using quarterly vs latest > shouldn't have any bearing on the problems you're experiencing though. > > Due to the way pkg.conf(5) works, if you have a > /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/anything.conf that defines a 'FreeBSD' tag -- > this will be merged with the settings from /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf. You > can see what the resulting configuration is by running 'pkg -vv' This is the output: $ pkg -vv Version : 1.9.4 PKG_DBDIR = "/var/db/pkg"; PKG_CACHEDIR = "/var/cache/pkg"; PORTSDIR = "/usr/ports"; INDEXDIR = ""; INDEXFILE = "INDEX-10"; HANDLE_RC_SCRIPTS = false; DEFAULT_ALWAYS_YES = false; ASSUME_ALWAYS_YES = false; REPOS_DIR [ "/etc/pkg/", "/usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/", ] PLIST_KEYWORDS_DIR = ""; SYSLOG = true; ABI = "FreeBSD:10:amd64"; ALTABI = "freebsd:10:x86:64"; DEVELOPER_MODE = false; VULNXML_SITE = "http://vuxml.freebsd.org/freebsd/vuln.xml.bz2"; FETCH_RETRY = 3; PKG_PLUGINS_DIR = "/usr/local/lib/pkg/"; PKG_ENABLE_PLUGINS = true; PLUGINS [ ] DEBUG_SCRIPTS = false; PLUGINS_CONF_DIR = "/usr/local/etc/pkg/"; PERMISSIVE = false; REPO_AUTOUPDATE = true; NAMESERVER = ""; HTTP_USER_AGENT = "pkg/1.9.4"; EVENT_PIPE = ""; FETCH_TIMEOUT = 30; UNSET_TIMESTAMP = false; SSH_RESTRICT_DIR = ""; PKG_ENV { } PKG_SSH_ARGS = ""; DEBUG_LEVEL = 0; ALIAS { all-depends = "query %dn-%dv"; annotations = "info -A"; build-depends = "info -qd"; cinfo = "info -Cx"; comment = "query -i \"%c\""; csearch = "search -Cx"; desc = "query -i \"%e\""; download = "fetch"; iinfo = "info -ix"; isearch = "search -ix"; prime-list = "query -e '%a = 0' '%n'"; leaf = "query -e '%#r == 0' '%n-%v'"; list = "info -ql"; noauto = "query -e '%a == 0' '%n-%v'"; options = "query -i \"%n - %Ok: %Ov\""; origin = "info -qo"; provided-depends = "info -qb"; raw = "info -R"; required-depends = "info -qr"; roptions = "rquery -i \"%n - %Ok: %Ov\""; shared-depends = "info -qB"; show = "info -f -k"; size = "info -sq"; } CUDF_SOLVER = ""; SAT_SOLVER = ""; RUN_SCRIPTS = true; CASE_SENSITIVE_MATCH = false; LOCK_WAIT = 1; LOCK_RETRIES = 5; SQLITE_PROFILE = false; WORKERS_COUNT = 0; READ_LOCK = false; PLIST_ACCEPT_DIRECTORIES = false; IP_VERSION = 0; AUTOMERGE = true; VERSION_SOURCE = ""; CONSERVATIVE_UPGRADE = true; PKG_CREATE_VERBOSE = false; AUTOCLEAN = false; DOT_FILE = ""; REPOSITORIES { } VALID_URL_SCHEME [ "pkg+http", "pkg+https", "https", "http", "file", "ssh", "ftp", "ftps", "pkg+ssh", "pkg+ftp", "pkg+ftps", ] ALLOW_BASE_SHLIBS = false; WARN_SIZE_LIMIT = 1048576; METALOG = ""; Repositories: FreeBSD: { url : "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:10:amd64/latest", enabled : yes, priority : 0, mirror_type : "SRV", signature_type : "FINGERPRINTS", fingerprints : "/usr/share/keys/pkg" } > Cheers, > > Matthew Thank you very much for your help, Matthew. Francesco From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Dec 18 17:59:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1BFC85A21 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:59:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 805BA1093 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:59:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:1c1d:86a1:a200:b700]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E81A5A198 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:59:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/E81A5A198; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Pkg problem after upgrading from 9.3 to 10.3 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20161218154643.106f91f2@Stream> <55bca76f-bff9-d528-1096-1f5b7594c8c3@FreeBSD.org> <20161218183041.77f47019@Stream> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:59:47 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161218183041.77f47019@Stream> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="eE28h6gjdpOCQrl7AJ3vDr30gXj9aVbQs" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:00:00 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --eE28h6gjdpOCQrl7AJ3vDr30gXj9aVbQs Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="4NLxoaKaIgv2gXDc4w7VSle04CHfXm5TO"; protected-headers="v1" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: Pkg problem after upgrading from 9.3 to 10.3 References: <20161218154643.106f91f2@Stream> <55bca76f-bff9-d528-1096-1f5b7594c8c3@FreeBSD.org> <20161218183041.77f47019@Stream> In-Reply-To: <20161218183041.77f47019@Stream> --4NLxoaKaIgv2gXDc4w7VSle04CHfXm5TO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18/12/2016 17:30, francesco scaglione wrote: > On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:06:29 +0000 > Matthew Seaman wrote: >> This sounds like a problem with the DNS -- although why should this >> affect you after upgrading to 10.x? Did you switch to enabling the >> local_unbound service when you upgraded? >=20 > Uhm, I don't think so... I just answered "y" to a few "does this look > reasonable to you" questions. How could I check this? Do you have: local_unbound_enable=3D"YES" in /etc/rc.conf? >> What does this DNS query return for you? >> >> % dig IN SRV _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org >> >> That should give you a list of download sites with >> 'pkgmir.geo.freebsd.org' marked as the highest priority. Connecting >> to this repo by name will automatically direct you to the closest >> package mirror to your location. That's pkg0.bme.freebsd.org for >> people in Europe. >=20 > Right, I've tried first with dig: >=20 > $ dig IN SRV _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org > dig: not found Heh. Yes, dig is no longer in the base system in 10.x. I reflexively install bind-tools nowadays. > and then with drill: >=20 > $ drill IN SRV _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org > Warning: Could not create a resolver structure: Could not open the > files ((null)) Try drill @localhost if you have a resolver running on > your machine. OK, this isn't good. I suspect this is the cause of your problems. Try this. # sysrc local_unbound_enable=3DYES # service local_unbound setup # service local_unbound start and try again with drill(1). If there is still no joy, let us know what the contents of /etc/resolv.conf and /var/unbound/forward.conf are. > Repositories: > FreeBSD: {=20 > url : > "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:10:amd64/latest", enabled := > yes, priority : 0, > mirror_type : "SRV", > signature_type : "FINGERPRINTS", > fingerprints : "/usr/share/keys/pkg" > } Apart from the line wrapping having gone a bit wonky (cut'n'paste error?) this looks fine. Cheers, Matthew --4NLxoaKaIgv2gXDc4w7VSle04CHfXm5TO-- --eE28h6gjdpOCQrl7AJ3vDr30gXj9aVbQs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYVs6ZXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATwV4QAIEwc6pPi4atIb7qrmIoAud7 qch7xLCW73hsw+DRzfkpyWJSUjYRtuez6Jc4ZMdB7ChVvKXQ0/PATOYSNuo2Qyn2 7+2INL2fp8226oMg7rWh+mUOouClckksQzzz8IAwt26kysbCeqEM+SRLo30Qy+Fw nsOxKIiL+/zVnPxOUYYpecqKqXS3rQaawpiokaNpxQkCRWUE4/ZmoZwB6G4Z0fxS spw2Tmf5inS9Isk+NW43w6iBUS8uz7rm5u6CgvUq7losDwqpC8UmcSYFR6KTndzN 8zmBZJxln1ahbuMnELN9Dyy3dNOvxZGfkLHRFcmcHSXO2NTHSgw3302u15Ey0eGw 91Pq8loYCxeT7oCzKArLvzVy8p3a8rDvr0h2lUZT+WgEvJplNpiAOlP2jDB7PwWM 3uGjiXxUn5eFj7mN8rBpssQz0OAfobY+CF4Z/X/0Ix8qvH7HXyWXtQBPi3Af6dSM /v8EG6ZGyVqEDbOFj+ATNM6uItkEikI0prErhnnynPlBl3g2DLz8achgAO8VfkzT JV/t7ppoSGtuK2h7sobVVwkwCJeKxn0YsLQN07LTSbwx9kR1aoeXTcR/DFFVeo4I Tuh7sqhY+ibuoBik0ETYS3waqHbiDN0HQS6OR/lqRY5g3CoiSahQV9ul4SO4PByQ 6ZcDfJH+j2k5/GTVRKsk =tBMr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eE28h6gjdpOCQrl7AJ3vDr30gXj9aVbQs-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Dec 18 18:15:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32620C84691 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:15:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.227]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cdptpa-oedge", Issuer "cdptpa-oedge" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1A00E08 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:15:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from [76.181.114.47] ([76.181.114.47:44354] helo=raspberrypi.bildanet.com) by cdptpa-omsmta02 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.9.48312 r(Core:3.6.9.0)) with ESMTP id B6/A0-28949-3E1D6585; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:13:55 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.40] (helo=desktop.example.org) by raspberrypi.bildanet.com with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1cIfy7-0004iU-16 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 13:13:55 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: scrat Subject: Building documentation Message-ID: <3d19a8d7-53bc-4293-58a9-0600d1effdc9@columbus.rr.com> Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 13:13:54 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.7:25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 18:15:05 -0000 I am trying to build the documentation and building with FORMATS="html html-split" works. I then tried to build the pdf version it complained about textproc/fop so I built and installed it. cd /usr/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook make FORMATS=pdf DESTDIR=/tmp install It will build a pdf but when I view it in okular all I get is ###### #### etc for most of the words. I am assuming that I need to install a font, if so which ones as it is not pointed out in fdp-primer. Also I think under the "2.1. Required Tools" section fop should be listed as textproc/docproj doesn't install it. Thanks for the help From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Dec 18 19:04:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBEDC8786D for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 19:04:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C47441F3F for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 19:04:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id uBIJ4FVX097609 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Dec 2016 12:04:15 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id uBIJ4FuJ097606; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 12:04:15 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 12:04:15 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: scrat cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building documentation In-Reply-To: <3d19a8d7-53bc-4293-58a9-0600d1effdc9@columbus.rr.com> Message-ID: References: <3d19a8d7-53bc-4293-58a9-0600d1effdc9@columbus.rr.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.1 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 18 Dec 2016 12:04:16 -0700 (MST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 19:04:20 -0000 On Sun, 18 Dec 2016, scrat wrote: > I am trying to build the documentation and building with FORMATS="html > html-split" works. I then tried to build the pdf version it complained about > textproc/fop so I built and installed it. > > cd /usr/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook > make FORMATS=pdf DESTDIR=/tmp install > > It will build a pdf but when I view it in okular all I get is ###### #### etc > for most of the words. I am assuming that I need to install a font, if so > which ones as it is not pointed out in fdp-primer. Also I think under the > "2.1. Required Tools" section fop should be listed as textproc/docproj > doesn't install it. fop is an optional dependency which can be selected if the port is installed. It will not be installed by the package, which uses the default options. Yes, the instructions could stand to be updated. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Dec 18 19:18:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EF3C87C4E for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 19:18:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cdptpa-oedge", Issuer "cdptpa-oedge" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE508150C for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 19:18:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baho-utot@columbus.rr.com) Received: from [76.181.114.47] ([76.181.114.47:44383] helo=raspberrypi.bildanet.com) by cdptpa-omsmta03 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.9.48312 r(Core:3.6.9.0)) with ESMTP id 46/C6-05528-2A0E6585; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 19:16:50 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.40] (helo=desktop.example.org) by raspberrypi.bildanet.com with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1cIgwz-0004k7-LN; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:16:49 -0500 Subject: Re: Building documentation To: Warren Block References: <3d19a8d7-53bc-4293-58a9-0600d1effdc9@columbus.rr.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: scrat Message-ID: Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 14:16:49 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.88:25 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 19:18:05 -0000 On 12/18/16 14:04, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 18 Dec 2016, scrat wrote: > >> I am trying to build the documentation and building with FORMATS="html >> html-split" works. I then tried to build the pdf version it >> complained about textproc/fop so I built and installed it. >> >> cd /usr/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook >> make FORMATS=pdf DESTDIR=/tmp install >> >> It will build a pdf but when I view it in okular all I get is ###### >> #### etc for most of the words. I am assuming that I need to install >> a font, if so which ones as it is not pointed out in fdp-primer. Also >> I think under the "2.1. Required Tools" section fop should be listed >> as textproc/docproj doesn't install it. > > fop is an optional dependency which can be selected if the port is > installed. It will not be installed by the package, which uses the > default options. Yes, the instructions could stand to be updated. Ok, but do you know how to solve the text being rendered as ######## in the pdf? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Dec 18 22:46:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 598F9C87A56 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 22:46:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from francesco.scaglione@sfr.fr) Received: from smtp26.services.sfr.fr (smtp26.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10AF61DEE for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 22:46:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from francesco.scaglione@sfr.fr) Received: from Stream (unknown [88.191.55.99]) by msfrf2607.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5441B1C002433 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 23:38:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from Stream (unknown [88.191.55.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: scaglione.francesco@neuf.fr) by msfrf2607.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTPSA for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 23:38:06 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: sfr.fr; auth=pass (LOGIN) smtp.auth=scaglione.francesco@neuf.fr Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 23:38:05 +0100 From: francesco scaglione To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pkg problem after upgrading from 9.3 to 10.3 Message-ID: <20161218233805.1978ee55@Stream> In-Reply-To: References: <20161218154643.106f91f2@Stream> <55bca76f-bff9-d528-1096-1f5b7594c8c3@FreeBSD.org> <20161218183041.77f47019@Stream> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-sfr-mailing: LEGIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 22:46:54 -0000 On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:59:47 +0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 18/12/2016 17:30, francesco scaglione wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:06:29 +0000 > > Matthew Seaman wrote: > > >> This sounds like a problem with the DNS -- although why should this > >> affect you after upgrading to 10.x? Did you switch to enabling the > >> local_unbound service when you upgraded? > > > > Uhm, I don't think so... I just answered "y" to a few "does this > > look reasonable to you" questions. How could I check this? > > Do you have: > > local_unbound_enable="YES" > > in /etc/rc.conf? Not now, no; was it there in 9.3? > >> What does this DNS query return for you? > >> > >> % dig IN SRV _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org > >> > >> That should give you a list of download sites with > >> 'pkgmir.geo.freebsd.org' marked as the highest priority. > >> Connecting to this repo by name will automatically direct you to > >> the closest package mirror to your location. That's > >> pkg0.bme.freebsd.org for people in Europe. > > > > Right, I've tried first with dig: > > > > $ dig IN SRV _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org > > dig: not found > > Heh. Yes, dig is no longer in the base system in 10.x. I reflexively > install bind-tools nowadays. > > > and then with drill: > > > > $ drill IN SRV _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org > > Warning: Could not create a resolver structure: Could not open the > > files ((null)) Try drill @localhost if you have a resolver running > > on your machine. > > OK, this isn't good. I suspect this is the cause of your problems. > > Try this. > > # sysrc local_unbound_enable=YES > # service local_unbound setup > # service local_unbound start # sysrc local_unbound_enable=YES local_unbound_enable: NO -> YES # service local_unbound setup Performing initial setup. Extracting forwarders from /etc/resolv.conf. /usr/sbin/local-unbound-setup: cannot open /etc/resolv.conf: No such file or directory No forwarders found in resolv.conf, unbound will recurse. /var/unbound/lan-zones.conf created /var/unbound/control.conf created /var/unbound/unbound.conf created /etc/resolvconf.conf created /usr/sbin/local-unbound-setup: cannot open /etc/resolv.conf: No such file or directory /etc/resolv.conf created # service local_unbound start Starting local_unbound. > and try again with drill(1). If there is still no joy, let us know > what the contents of /etc/resolv.conf and /var/unbound/forward.conf > are. # drill IN SRV _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org Error: error sending query: No (valid) nameservers defined in the resolver But at least, now I have: #pkg update Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... Fetching meta.txz: 100% 944 B 0.9kB/s 00:01 Fetching packagesite.txz: 100% 6 MiB 2.0MB/s 00:03 Processing entries: 100% FreeBSD repository update completed. 25735 packages processed. # pkg upgrade Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking for upgrades (0 candidates): 100% Processing candidates (0 candidates): 100% Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) Your packages are up to date. Should I be happy with that or shall I dig further? Thanks again for your attention, Francesco From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 19 01:09:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7F8C8340B for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 01:09:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4ea:bd49:619b:6cb3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79C78279 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 01:09:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:1c1d:86a1:a200:b700]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 05F1FA2B8 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 01:09:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/05F1FA2B8; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Pkg problem after upgrading from 9.3 to 10.3 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20161218154643.106f91f2@Stream> <55bca76f-bff9-d528-1096-1f5b7594c8c3@FreeBSD.org> <20161218183041.77f47019@Stream> <20161218233805.1978ee55@Stream> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 01:09:43 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161218233805.1978ee55@Stream> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NuIk6KV1q9TdqdvnlX1KFTQsruoDeQpgh" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 01:09:54 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --NuIk6KV1q9TdqdvnlX1KFTQsruoDeQpgh Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="fSCrgjePmttSrxm4VGp4krHriwUAw34om"; protected-headers="v1" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: Pkg problem after upgrading from 9.3 to 10.3 References: <20161218154643.106f91f2@Stream> <55bca76f-bff9-d528-1096-1f5b7594c8c3@FreeBSD.org> <20161218183041.77f47019@Stream> <20161218233805.1978ee55@Stream> In-Reply-To: <20161218233805.1978ee55@Stream> --fSCrgjePmttSrxm4VGp4krHriwUAw34om Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 18/12/2016 22:38, francesco scaglione wrote: > On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:59:47 +0000 > Matthew Seaman wrote: >=20 >> On 18/12/2016 17:30, francesco scaglione wrote: >>> On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:06:29 +0000 >>> Matthew Seaman wrote: =20 >> >>>> This sounds like a problem with the DNS -- although why should this >>>> affect you after upgrading to 10.x? Did you switch to enabling the >>>> local_unbound service when you upgraded? =20 >>> >>> Uhm, I don't think so... I just answered "y" to a few "does this >>> look reasonable to you" questions. How could I check this? =20 >> >> Do you have: >> >> local_unbound_enable=3D"YES" >> >> in /etc/rc.conf? >=20 > Not now, no; was it there in 9.3? No -- local_unbound was new in 10.0 >>>> What does this DNS query return for you? >>>> >>>> % dig IN SRV _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org >>>> >>>> That should give you a list of download sites with >>>> 'pkgmir.geo.freebsd.org' marked as the highest priority. >>>> Connecting to this repo by name will automatically direct you to >>>> the closest package mirror to your location. That's >>>> pkg0.bme.freebsd.org for people in Europe. =20 >>> >>> Right, I've tried first with dig: >>> >>> $ dig IN SRV _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org >>> dig: not found =20 >> >> Heh. Yes, dig is no longer in the base system in 10.x. I reflexively= >> install bind-tools nowadays. >> >>> and then with drill: >>> >>> $ drill IN SRV _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org >>> Warning: Could not create a resolver structure: Could not open the >>> files ((null)) Try drill @localhost if you have a resolver running >>> on your machine. =20 >> >> OK, this isn't good. I suspect this is the cause of your problems. >> >> Try this. >> >> # sysrc local_unbound_enable=3DYES >> # service local_unbound setup >> # service local_unbound start >=20 > # sysrc local_unbound_enable=3DYES > local_unbound_enable: NO -> YES >=20 > # service local_unbound setup > Performing initial setup. > Extracting forwarders from /etc/resolv.conf. > /usr/sbin/local-unbound-setup: cannot open /etc/resolv.conf: No such > file or directory >=20 Yeah -- that's the smoking gun as to why pkg(8) was having problems. You didn't have /etc/resolv.conf or anything set up so your system could do DNS lookups. > No forwarders found in resolv.conf, unbound will recurse. This means that local_unbound will do all the work of DNS lookups itself, rather than handing the task off to the resolvers provided by your ISP (the 'forwarders' it mentions.) It's 6 of one and half-a-dozen of the other as to whether it's better to have forwarders or just have local_unbound recurse for itself. > /var/unbound/lan-zones.conf created > /var/unbound/control.conf created > /var/unbound/unbound.conf created > /etc/resolvconf.conf created > /usr/sbin/local-unbound-setup: cannot open /etc/resolv.conf: No such > file or directory > /etc/resolv.conf created >=20 > # service local_unbound start > Starting local_unbound. >=20 >> and try again with drill(1). If there is still no joy, let us know >> what the contents of /etc/resolv.conf and /var/unbound/forward.conf >> are. >=20 > # drill IN SRV _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org > Error: error sending query: No (valid) nameservers defined in the > resolver Curious. This should work if the local_unbound service is up and running= =2E > But at least, now I have: >=20 > #pkg update > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > Fetching meta.txz: 100% 944 B 0.9kB/s 00:01 =20 > Fetching packagesite.txz: 100% 6 MiB 2.0MB/s 00:03 =20 > Processing entries: 100% > FreeBSD repository update completed. 25735 packages processed. >=20 > # pkg upgrade > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > All repositories are up-to-date. > Checking for upgrades (0 candidates): 100% > Processing candidates (0 candidates): 100% > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > Your packages are up to date. >=20 > Should I be happy with that or shall I dig further? So, enabling local_unbound has meant that you can successfully do DNS lookups now. You don't *have* to do anything more. It does, however, seem you somehow mislaid the configuration that you must have been using with 9.x --- entirely up to you if you can recover what that was or if you'ld prefer to revert back to that. Cheers, Matthew --fSCrgjePmttSrxm4VGp4krHriwUAw34om-- --NuIk6KV1q9TdqdvnlX1KFTQsruoDeQpgh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYVzNdXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkAT11UP/RN6M2ec1/wFrUuvopqlUCR1 wY5jMVGgrDJXaaVlcKrL/idBBlK3QDUzgjVHow5Q5YNrs4cHimoXP0QpxHHnTC3z C1sNhNOK80jc3oybYqmsD0ug+NvtlcwqtFE2PcZNqdG0/SQHXYt0Mmwtk5KY7UpB FDF2m+u/Lb51VHbG7fW2TwAVKmjtdC79W5inyFyOX859pqdnGoq9U7E9ff6uDRDi b79dD6FI3DqsWGRg9KkNNSulXNXXuvqL8NmyyqdDKeHJlnq+D+MTCLqMThEFSGpb ro75F3O+XAAVZ1PR4fmm0xKmN6CL7EBBzoaYEtrxWO10c+qfUKR/Ugz8KJNZJwyp QNKxpFzXqxRwE8nlRgi3mYuC9NlO12gcFiXHFnWQqEKMu2N8ONi3z3o3OKKAh5dz W8fB3dWaxnZ+gv46OwSdkj0t4fiB57f0gatexuOtxwJg4XpXEUEKai+/JrsJ1+U9 /lZG75wVquqr1cQtRWUfYuG3XTo99V8xBpNFNiW2y2EOZ/fz/U9E/S3dUNEUszzg 8aSXQMBwmcRO+4N1NqCeWh+PfquQpximxIeXZCiRkF5ElEWqqRiqRRIP0aV/YQNA 4wVdDbDrB6Lm1VRbI9m5kUMFsMY//A9R44ZSG/jP6ZumgYSzDc8907kckpnAktFZ Zk31IWjdJ4M/r3etKY8G =PA5Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NuIk6KV1q9TdqdvnlX1KFTQsruoDeQpgh-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 19 04:54:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B684C8348B for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 04:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.mehler@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wj0-x22b.google.com (mail-wj0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F186694C for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 04:54:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.mehler@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wj0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id tg4so140722983wjb.1 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 20:54:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Z+9LqFtkxHYCgy6g4K5t1caGdcrjO0FlXAQ5B/qdX58=; b=F/NJDugQzXbmlyqyKKLpQAPVm5oIGdY521ZYZZmOZ08VgURhnN33uAAOHH8iGwxMFF zOON3AgXzUISR88DbD9910IHoQLIW581lnG/xARSU6D8LfNMx0uSuMFpXedIl0LfPs2W 1F9idjlu55GbMDE/Hs9GIolj99v+g82bbU+5GNMnJC4I5iYEHkzh6TQtJyzlqMKESE9+ vjlIMmy5J4Q5Gpxtebp962EENjCg50qKsCFLb/vXpSUiXHuVcTuW4fX4YD7lRcuCK2Q6 DpV+rtyD1UAZVycSC/JcT7l58yUUv0Km20G1UxVOcw7Nno+EITvL1O6UYoogn9vwTP/X DV7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Z+9LqFtkxHYCgy6g4K5t1caGdcrjO0FlXAQ5B/qdX58=; b=hr50rIPQ0w3so4obJ6pjLxS0zMA+7RnTfwwID/0RVsgYNh5TqD83JhJdCDh7pk2DqH p3N55so9kWxwb7GWwp40tacyYgP+sdtQwLXy2ErJp4qaNIgpEUZYQXkFH5rmq+IG0JI7 jMNH5WGT+hzKbRXqUxAtu19ctM0u+AkoD/t0RKqiooehctL/FheU69YY2jzBwf5yjar4 +fZjK1fqbh2wnHzH39HemFYuBwHnd9dslqhrmZx+xdbTqqqaA++0fEcWMda2myYGIcGS U2MhAp7N7weTkvSmXgrV0qwMuRujYnFoj2oupo5dRXQj7pg7vKRmPxNfLSjC09lxXwvR Llgg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02CMc/pfRc0ytLkgcTQzEB+LzQQx0dVtXogBTCtgKYB5WBP8gLf4MPwxy0ve5KHT/fQKlOPqZi1/n73Rw== X-Received: by 10.194.0.197 with SMTP id 5mr14531150wjg.175.1482123281899; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 20:54:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.239.104 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 20:54:41 -0800 (PST) From: David Mehler Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 23:54:41 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: ssl certificate To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 04:54:44 -0000 Hello, Right now I'm doing self-signed ssl certificates, with my own CA. This works fine, but might break. I've got a user who will be connecting via sftp and via https and who might be put off by the self signed aspect. I am wondering if there are any free ssl providers? I know there were once some, but thought they went under. I am wanting something free, but has a broad browser base, Ios, Android, Kindle, windows etc browsers and connection software Es File explorer, filezilla etc. Any suggestions appreciated. Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 19 04:58:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A60C835A8 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 04:58:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amitabhkant@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qt0-x230.google.com (mail-qt0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B805EDB6 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 04:58:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amitabhkant@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt0-x230.google.com with SMTP id p16so135132764qta.0 for ; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 20:58:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=K7TNnE1aLiHy0Af7q9+K6EjiaSpoYTPivJzBMvk/QhM=; b=GM5dtiX2dc98DQOn19PC98q5LaDYg8H+a4ksQ3oiMPlbrUYydXzQ7JvVnj3LvHtsB0 dPf8iLTsPlOshpuzWh+Y1JyVirmUqMR2+5zYLzuuGV9uMhJhapdyv0zgeFFkInaFxa8p qGu9kBLfqSwFb0H3osmKSl20/6eaOIFLxw9kI2vow0pdSzngPg3dtVt5BnxrnYMQZeJ7 KajS0rANcFeXLfVEobwfNCMGWQ1OGB26xzmU4jN/jSvXyH+Ijo/X14EO1FXEjwqrTknR p4Q+lTnqiqlBxLecLqNbjnCGovwaOQrCfYn7wqg3eiW9gQyet/GFNk/pyZOTYHcUnSP1 pfKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=K7TNnE1aLiHy0Af7q9+K6EjiaSpoYTPivJzBMvk/QhM=; b=G5+ztLM/kFSkg2kkhBkhTBlpGkzqa9lpRIxOYb+TzOUmieLuFS71T0uLFNZW1/pVg9 u6NUecddoZ1lxwB9EK5AAkUXHqGpnIP482DyuEo3qOrqTFM+he1a0wP9/xondrJs11sU b5Dm68lo9Viri5b1ZI/ZNjs4VBoKLuCDVn8mGqPJ4DexkgAKwFIU9Mn8FJha3kiHkm7i roSFRPqyR2MvYhKD5T8+FPIdvy3DDlplaqh2+7ugQq79ROCt24QXaF08mfLJImomRPih hwFDUd2dMgIui3I9JEH4V2tc89DUvL3Qu53H9gAlo2qZcu43G8Hlp+FnNbJZbW1Zeb9k LGeg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJNfdnnCVrdhDlynB4/78tDZrkE+tKZYT8VrftFvqKs6JAOKMhTMpKMoOrFZFvKzlR14HIHA1XcHLeDcg== X-Received: by 10.237.44.161 with SMTP id g30mr13737458qtd.144.1482123511923; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 20:58:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.237.55.10 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 20:58:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Amitabh Kant Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:28:11 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ssl certificate To: David Mehler Cc: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 04:58:33 -0000 Try https://letsencrypt.org/ . It has a fairly broad acceptance. On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:24 AM, David Mehler wrote: > Hello, > > Right now I'm doing self-signed ssl certificates, with my own CA. This > works fine, but might break. I've got a user who will be connecting > via sftp and via https and who might be put off by the self signed > aspect. > > I am wondering if there are any free ssl providers? I know there were > once some, but thought they went under. I am wanting something free, > but has a broad browser base, Ios, Android, Kindle, windows etc > browsers and connection software Es File explorer, filezilla etc. > > Any suggestions appreciated. > > Thanks. > Dave. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 19 05:05:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4446FC83818 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 05:05:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@optinet.com) Received: from cobra.acceleratedweb.net (cobra-gw.acceleratedweb.net [207.99.79.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F3AB818B6 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 05:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@optinet.com) Received: (qmail 96006 invoked by uid 110); 19 Dec 2016 04:59:11 -0000 Received: from ool-43549c41.dyn.optonline.net (HELO desktop1) (simon@optinet.com@67.84.156.65) by cobra.acceleratedweb.net with SMTP; 19 Dec 2016 04:59:11 -0000 From: "Simon" To: "David Mehler" , "freebsd-questions" Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 23:59:11 -0500 Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2717) For Windows 2000 (5.1.2600;3) In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: ssl certificate Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 05:05:55 -0000 Email verified SSLs are down to $5 a year. -Simon On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 23:54:41 -0500, David Mehler wrote: >Hello, >Right now I'm doing self-signed ssl certificates, with my own CA. This >works fine, but might break. I've got a user who will be connecting >via sftp and via https and who might be put off by the self signed >aspect. >I am wondering if there are any free ssl providers? I know there were >once some, but thought they went under. I am wanting something free, >but has a broad browser base, Ios, Android, Kindle, windows etc >browsers and connection software Es File explorer, filezilla etc. >Any suggestions appreciated. >Thanks. >Dave. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 19 08:24:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B94C8806F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 08:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vbotka@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wj0-x244.google.com (mail-wj0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c01::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 437B81FF8 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 08:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vbotka@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wj0-x244.google.com with SMTP id j10so22491640wjb.3 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:24:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version; bh=JafxpzPNlf7x7xiVxi7PQ0V5uGVrfx3HZd8qaW/f/jM=; b=YMWtecrKoABQEtHjFJXOy5k5AeAWEM7uC4kxdkVCtVxCkOFhI/ndEZMxd0LC84m/rZ vDX2uY8urR3A1ubl00QrBpIpFGJ7TKVdM3uJ5EB1Z26gpD9rFPC6rwEhxvHMp+dCcc8m 4wTwGFsw8QClKxOrAg/1lF4F/nrf944pexYuI4SYFJwPGp2hYmVIqNYBeVebAmCQ1VVN TbLV7Y+aBRQwFNZBY5XjlFxssKr59nVNEzfVg72meGx96t5oVpvUR7oetCz+WGbAb3vg JAMSJTQcWjSZ9+U9JGmyR7uo7fWS931Nl46QlkODVJ4YLBZmIxGglvvPBmNF9Bcnf62E 08hA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version; bh=JafxpzPNlf7x7xiVxi7PQ0V5uGVrfx3HZd8qaW/f/jM=; b=Jyth67KA5LHXCRGJUVEc73wpOyEhVTOG1mmBaZx/GL/ixmi8plSAv8WTht5GC6RJkX oYP3iBxRWN520vktUy35O2XjClGa5s/EGrbzxDiaS+WQnviaHlkGSYPKUGk7cMho9xc0 va45olWTWct2y0YWQXDfgv6kJUsxp5/ye4+1NCoCwdVsxmBy11rMs8m5ffVy/8mR+laM 7OBmbwFRFRKTEyiZf4trvsDYct24a94IYoNbzhFJe0m43eyiKAxSWDrWNI9UPSnh47Tz TYFPZp+cEidHxLNMex4dsYa6TC6+U78IJW0Ew8vrbdG0OGQwAaqS6HtK6VrYdawQVxZf yyyw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXL12tZcygdgji3atPxKq8T+KeFTyRUPa/oxD/opBQhnGqByfX5a1buBqlvYS87iyg== X-Received: by 10.194.85.137 with SMTP id h9mr12106391wjz.23.1482135845134; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:24:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from planb.netng.org (85-237-234-55.dynamic.orange.sk. [85.237.234.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id wg8sm19479134wjb.42.2016.12.19.00.24.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Dec 2016 00:24:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 09:23:54 +0100 From: Vladimir Botka To: Amitabh Kant Cc: David Mehler , freebsd-questions Subject: Re: ssl certificate Message-ID: <20161219092354.4aa0f1c4@planb.netng.org> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: na X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; i686-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/==0m/8HLU1bc552m70Cw.SJ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 08:24:07 -0000 --Sig_/==0m/8HLU1bc552m70Cw.SJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:28:11 +0530 Amitabh Kant wrote: > Try https://letsencrypt.org/ . It has a fairly broad acceptance. >=20 > On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:24 AM, David Mehler > wrote: > > Hello, > > Right now I'm doing self-signed ssl certificates, with my own CA. This > > works fine, but might break. I've got a user who will be connecting > > via sftp and via https and who might be put off by the self signed > > aspect. > > I am wondering if there are any free ssl providers? Port security/py-certbot (letsencrypt.org client) works fine for me. FYI, Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME) is IETF project https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/ FWIW, you might want to try my scripts and automate the renewal via cron https://github.com/vbotka/le-utils. Available also as an Ansible role https://galaxy.ansible.com/vbotka/leutils/. There are also other letsencrypt clients https://github.com/certbot/certbot/wiki/Links#other-lets-encrypt--acme-clie= nts HTH, Cheers, -vlado --Sig_/==0m/8HLU1bc552m70Cw.SJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYV5kaAAoJEJDRmRKO1E8BtroIAKOeSiVfCxnNRgGcyHQLcEfa YgoQkq5neZoNgoqx9NgIYPeUriLEvSWJsBYP3EyTUD4qtHd873VGK88VmMpqkvJL /Ctcm7vXAch3a+KG1DdzP/bqmXo1DYvRXGyYVyeyVn0xVjkoSIQOzCagBXZ6Z+19 sp+VyISa30kyqwn9r8ARvf1iQkW3ps4OSz9mMJw1KSFDw9ivrfYW3IC0mQPhFy21 C1KF8NeooaWO5VbanwhpZOcYTC7VQPJ7Ny0T4luusz8YOeVPHEDMelEi5MciL6D1 2QUmgCrDQPC/jIs5GAoi3HviGoRcjsO0zHCtBQULrMEzFrBBjV7ApD/0OAsnoVs= =nS/m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/==0m/8HLU1bc552m70Cw.SJ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 19 09:20:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27EB2C88F3C for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 09:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from siskko@mail.bg) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A89666 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 09:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from siskko@mail.bg) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 10F8AC88F3B; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 09:20:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A28C88F3A for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 09:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from siskko@mail.bg) Received: from mx2.mail.bg (mx2.mail.bg [IPv6:2001:67c:16b8:1::2:18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A88C7665 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 09:20:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from siskko@mail.bg) Received: from siskko (unknown [46.10.8.230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.mail.bg (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D59216000BB4 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:20:00 +0200 (EET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=mail.bg; s=default; t=1482139200; bh=WQlOdjLyIGQWfPI2Uu+5tFh8tJ4Tsbxs689GrGSdHcQ=; h=From:Subject:To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Date; b=UnY5x29QNeepiGAGdhE3uKFmt+J8bE+O98F+sexrC+W0m2MSDhkV1hBJKt6Gn5hn9 0SfJt6k/mX5rJdk71GnNjn18dAnf8lCri7yfu4Ns3AwcpUKJV35caDOk/nkO79Q9KD wX3LaqzbrFDdeButhz0gwh14ZfIMTJGdSEz13hmA= From: "Sisi" Subject: =?UTF-8?B?T9C90LvQsNC50L0g0LzQsNCz0LDQt9C40L0=?= To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: "Sisi" Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:19:59 +0200 Priority: urgent X-Priority: 2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: Base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 09:20:03 -0000 0JLQt9C10LzQtdGC0LUgINCT0J7QotCe0JIg0J7QndCb0JDQmdCdINCc0JDQk9CQ0JfQmNCdDQrQ odC/0LXRgdGC0LXRgtC1INC00L4gOTcwINC70LIuINC+0YIg0L3QsNC10Lwg0Lgg0L7QsdGB0LvR g9C20LLQsNGJINC/0LXRgNGB0L7QvdCw0LshDQrQodGC0LDRgNGC0LjRgNCw0LnRgtC1INCS0LDR iNC40Y8g0L7QvdC70LDQudC9INCx0LjQt9C90LXRgSDQodCV0JPQkCEgDQoNCg0KDQrQn9Ce0JvQ o9Cn0JDQktCQ0KLQlToNCg0KL9Ch0L3QuNC80LrQsNGC0LAg0LUg0L3QsCDQv9GA0LjQvNC10YDQ tdC9INCz0L7RgtC+0LIg0L7QvdC70LDQudC9INC80LDQs9Cw0LfQuNC9INC30LAg0LzQvtC00LAv DQrQm9C10YHQtdC9INC30LAg0YPQv9C+0YLRgNC10LHQsCDQutC+0L3RgtGA0L7Qu9C10L0g0L/Q sNC90LXQuw0K0JjQt9Cx0L7RgCDQvdCwINGA0LDQt9C/0LvQsNGJ0LDRgtC10LvQvdC4INC40L3R gdGC0YDRg9C80LXQvdGC0LgNCg0K0J/QvtGC0YDQtdCx0LjRgtC10LvRgdC60LAg0LrQvtC70LjR h9C60LANCtCR0LXQt9Cx0YDQvtC5INC60LDRgtC10LPQvtGA0LjQuA0K0JzQvtCx0LjQu9C90LAg 0LLQtdGA0YHQuNGPDQrQmCDQvtGJ0LUg0LzQvdC+0LPQviDQtNGA0YPQs9C4Li4uIA0KDQoNCg0K 0JLQsNGI0LjRj9GCINC+0L3Qu9Cw0LnQvSDQvNCw0LPQsNC30LjQvSDRidC1INGA0LDQsdC+0YLQ uCAg0LTQtdC90L7QvdC+0YnQvdC+LCDRidC1INCz0LXQvdC10YDQuNGA0LAg0L/RgNC40YXQvtC0 0Lgg0Lgg0YnQtSDQktC4INC00L7QvdC10YHQtSDQsdC10LfQsdGA0L7QuSDQv9C+0LvQt9C4LCDQ sdC10Lcg0LTQsCDRgdC1INC90YPQttC00LDQtSDQvtGCINC90LXQv9C+0YHQuNC70L3QuCDRgNCw 0LfRhdC+0LTQuC4gDQrQm9C10YHQvdC+INC1ISANCtCX0LDQv9C+0YfQvdC10YLQtSDQtNCwINC/ 0YDQvtC00LDQstCw0YLQtSDQvtGJ0LUg0LTQvdC10YEhDQrQodCS0KrQoNCW0JXQotCVINCh0JUg 0KEg0J3QkNChINCh0JXQk9CQIQ0KIA0KICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgDQoNCg0KICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgVW5zdWJzY3JpYmUgbWUgZnJv bSB0aGUgbGlzdA0K From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 19 10:50:39 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3C5C8724C for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:50:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from francesco.scaglione@sfr.fr) Received: from smtp26.services.sfr.fr (smtp26.services.sfr.fr [93.17.128.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA6451EBA for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:50:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from francesco.scaglione@sfr.fr) Received: from biblioteca (production-radiop.rain.fr [194.206.179.1]) by msfrf2628.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2BE7E1C00082F for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:50:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from biblioteca (production-radiop.rain.fr [194.206.179.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: scaglione.francesco@neuf.fr) by msfrf2628.sfr.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTPSA for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:50:35 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: sfr.fr; auth=pass (LOGIN) smtp.auth=scaglione.francesco@neuf.fr Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:50:34 +0100 From: francesco scaglione To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pkg problem after upgrading from 9.3 to 10.3 Message-ID: <20161219115034.547f5732@biblioteca> In-Reply-To: References: <20161218154643.106f91f2@Stream> <55bca76f-bff9-d528-1096-1f5b7594c8c3@FreeBSD.org> <20161218183041.77f47019@Stream> <20161218233805.1978ee55@Stream> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-sfr-mailing: LEGIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:50:40 -0000 On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 01:09:43 +0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 18/12/2016 22:38, francesco scaglione wrote: > > On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:59:47 +0000 > > Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > >> On 18/12/2016 17:30, francesco scaglione wrote: > >>> On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 17:06:29 +0000 > >>> Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> > >>>> This sounds like a problem with the DNS -- although why should > >>>> this affect you after upgrading to 10.x? Did you switch to > >>>> enabling the local_unbound service when you upgraded? > >>> > >>> Uhm, I don't think so... I just answered "y" to a few "does this > >>> look reasonable to you" questions. How could I check this? > >> > >> Do you have: > >> > >> local_unbound_enable="YES" > >> > >> in /etc/rc.conf? > > > > Not now, no; was it there in 9.3? > > No -- local_unbound was new in 10.0 > > >>>> What does this DNS query return for you? > >>>> > >>>> % dig IN SRV _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org > >>>> > >>>> That should give you a list of download sites with > >>>> 'pkgmir.geo.freebsd.org' marked as the highest priority. > >>>> Connecting to this repo by name will automatically direct you to > >>>> the closest package mirror to your location. That's > >>>> pkg0.bme.freebsd.org for people in Europe. > >>> > >>> Right, I've tried first with dig: > >>> > >>> $ dig IN SRV _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org > >>> dig: not found > >> > >> Heh. Yes, dig is no longer in the base system in 10.x. I > >> reflexively install bind-tools nowadays. > >> > >>> and then with drill: > >>> > >>> $ drill IN SRV _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org > >>> Warning: Could not create a resolver structure: Could not open the > >>> files ((null)) Try drill @localhost if you have a resolver running > >>> on your machine. > >> > >> OK, this isn't good. I suspect this is the cause of your problems. > >> > >> Try this. > >> > >> # sysrc local_unbound_enable=YES > >> # service local_unbound setup > >> # service local_unbound start > > > > # sysrc local_unbound_enable=YES > > local_unbound_enable: NO -> YES > > > > # service local_unbound setup > > Performing initial setup. > > Extracting forwarders from /etc/resolv.conf. > > /usr/sbin/local-unbound-setup: cannot open /etc/resolv.conf: No such > > file or directory > > > > Yeah -- that's the smoking gun as to why pkg(8) was having problems. > You didn't have /etc/resolv.conf or anything set up so your system > could do DNS lookups. > > > No forwarders found in resolv.conf, unbound will recurse. > > This means that local_unbound will do all the work of DNS lookups > itself, rather than handing the task off to the resolvers provided by > your ISP (the 'forwarders' it mentions.) Maybe I should have told in the first place that this is a small dedicated hosted server, I'm sorry. > It's 6 of one and half-a-dozen of the other as to whether it's better > to have forwarders or just have local_unbound recurse for itself. > > > /var/unbound/lan-zones.conf created > > /var/unbound/control.conf created > > /var/unbound/unbound.conf created > > /etc/resolvconf.conf created > > /usr/sbin/local-unbound-setup: cannot open /etc/resolv.conf: No such > > file or directory > > /etc/resolv.conf created > > > > # service local_unbound start > > Starting local_unbound. > > > >> and try again with drill(1). If there is still no joy, let us know > >> what the contents of /etc/resolv.conf and /var/unbound/forward.conf > >> are. > > > > # drill IN SRV _http._tcp.pkg.freebsd.org > > Error: error sending query: No (valid) nameservers defined in the > > resolver > > Curious. This should work if the local_unbound service is up and > running. > > > But at least, now I have: > > > > #pkg update > > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > > Fetching meta.txz: 100% 944 B 0.9kB/s 00:01 > > Fetching packagesite.txz: 100% 6 MiB 2.0MB/s 00:03 > > Processing entries: 100% > > FreeBSD repository update completed. 25735 packages processed. > > > > # pkg upgrade > > Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... > > FreeBSD repository is up-to-date. > > All repositories are up-to-date. > > Checking for upgrades (0 candidates): 100% > > Processing candidates (0 candidates): 100% > > Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) > > Your packages are up to date. > > > > Should I be happy with that or shall I dig further? > > So, enabling local_unbound has meant that you can successfully do DNS > lookups now. You don't *have* to do anything more. It does, however, > seem you somehow mislaid the configuration that you must have been > using with 9.x --- entirely up to you if you can recover what that > was or if you'ld prefer to revert back to that. I'll pay more attention before the next upgrade! > Cheers, > > Matthew Thanks again for your help Matthew: for this thread in particular, of course, and for all the others in which your contribution is so important. Francesco From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 19 13:44:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2A7C86295 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:44:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@optinet.com) Received: from cobra.acceleratedweb.net (cobra-gw.acceleratedweb.net [207.99.79.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE7D119BA for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:44:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@optinet.com) Received: (qmail 30593 invoked by uid 110); 19 Dec 2016 13:44:05 -0000 Received: from ool-43549c41.dyn.optonline.net (HELO desktop1) (simon@optinet.com@67.84.156.65) by cobra.acceleratedweb.net with SMTP; 19 Dec 2016 13:44:05 -0000 From: "Simon" To: "freebsd-questions" Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 08:44:06 -0500 Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2717) For Windows 2000 (5.1.2600;3) In-Reply-To: <20161219092354.4aa0f1c4@planb.netng.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: ssl certificate Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:44:08 -0000 On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 09:23:54 +0100, Vladimir Botka wrote: >On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:28:11 +0530 >Amitabh Kant wrote: >> Try https://letsencrypt.org/ . It has a fairly broad acceptance. >>=20 >> On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 10:24 AM, David Mehler >> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > Right now I'm doing self-signed ssl certificates, with my own CA. This >> > works fine, but might break. I've got a user who will be connecting >> > via sftp and via https and who might be put off by the self signed >> > aspect. >> > I am wondering if there are any free ssl providers? >Port security/py-certbot (letsencrypt.org client) works fine for me. >FYI, Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME) is IETF >project https://github.com/ietf-wg-acme/acme/ >FWIW, you might want to try my scripts and automate the renewal via >cron https://github.com/vbotka/le-utils. Available also as an Ansible >role https://galaxy.ansible.com/vbotka/leutils/. >There are also other letsencrypt clients >https://github.com/certbot/certbot/wiki/Links#other-lets-encrypt--acme-clie= >nts >HTH, Cheers, > -vlado Also looking for free domains, servers, and English-speaking admins. Thanks! -Simon From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 19 13:48:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA7E1C86449 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:48:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@optinet.com) Received: from cobra.acceleratedweb.net (cobra-gw.acceleratedweb.net [207.99.79.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 781551BA3 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:48:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@optinet.com) Received: (qmail 30971 invoked by uid 110); 19 Dec 2016 13:48:57 -0000 Received: from ool-43549c41.dyn.optonline.net (HELO desktop1) (simon@optinet.com@67.84.156.65) by cobra.acceleratedweb.net with SMTP; 19 Dec 2016 13:48:57 -0000 From: "Simon" To: "freebsd-questions" Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 08:48:58 -0500 Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2717) For Windows 2000 (5.1.2600;3) In-Reply-To: <20161219092354.4aa0f1c4@planb.netng.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: ssl certificate Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:48:59 -0000 >On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:28:11 +0530 >Amitabh Kant wrote: >> Try https://letsencrypt.org/ . It has a fairly broad acceptance. >>=20 "Today we kicked off our first crowdfunding campaign with the goal of raising enough funds to cover about one month of our operations - $200,000. " $200k a month? automated? nonprofit? :D That isn't free, that is called indirect funding or other people's money. -Simon From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 19 13:50:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1970C865B2 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:50:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from bede.home.qeng-ho.org (bede.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org", Issuer "fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 597781E65 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:50:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from arthur.home.qeng-ho.org (arthur.home.qeng-ho.org [172.23.1.2]) by bede.home.qeng-ho.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id uBJDoj5Y020145; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:50:45 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Subject: Re: ssl certificate To: Simon , freebsd-questions References: <20161219134905.7772621BF4@inbound-queue-3.mail.thdo.gradwell.net> From: Arthur Chance Message-ID: <1575f9f9-95c9-b881-b2b1-79f80381774b@qeng-ho.org> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:50:45 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161219134905.7772621BF4@inbound-queue-3.mail.thdo.gradwell.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:50:55 -0000 On 19/12/2016 13:48, Simon wrote: > >> On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:28:11 +0530 >> Amitabh Kant wrote: > >>> Try https://letsencrypt.org/ . It has a fairly broad acceptance. >>> =20 > > "Today we kicked off our first crowdfunding campaign with the goal > of raising enough funds to cover about one month of our operations > - $200,000. " > > $200k a month? automated? nonprofit? :D > > That isn't free, that is called indirect funding or other people's money. Exactly like the root DNS servers. Do you have problems with those? -- Schrödinger's cat had 18 half lives. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 19 14:04:22 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCAB6C86B2D for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:04:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "miucha.iecc.com", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 DV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 822C117E2 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:04:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 67916 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2016 14:04:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 19 Dec 2016 14:04:26 -0000 Date: 19 Dec 2016 14:03:59 -0000 Message-ID: <20161219140359.17735.qmail@ary.lan> From: "John Levine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: simon@optinet.com Subject: Re: ssl certificate In-Reply-To: <20161219050611.86184.qmail@submit.iecc.com> Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 14:04:23 -0000 >>I am wondering if there are any free ssl providers? I know there were >>once some, but thought they went under. I am wanting something free, >>but has a broad browser base, Ios, Android, Kindle, windows etc >>browsers and connection software Es File explorer, filezilla etc. You want Let's Encrypt. They don't charge for their certs, and their CA is widely accepted. A recept paper says they're now the #3 CA by number of active certs. There are a bunch of different open source clients for LE. I use a cute little shell script called acme.sh for the web and mail certs on my fbsd system. The certs have to be renewed every 3 months so you definitely want to set it up so it can renew automatically. https://github.com/Neilpang/acme.sh R's, John From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 19 15:43:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F56C8896A for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 15:43:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@optinet.com) Received: from cobra.acceleratedweb.net (cobra-gw.acceleratedweb.net [207.99.79.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2239C1925 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 15:43:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@optinet.com) Received: (qmail 39556 invoked by uid 110); 19 Dec 2016 15:43:51 -0000 Received: from ool-43549c41.dyn.optonline.net (HELO desktop1) (simon@optinet.com@67.84.156.65) by cobra.acceleratedweb.net with SMTP; 19 Dec 2016 15:43:51 -0000 From: "Simon" To: "Arthur Chance" , "freebsd-questions" Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:43:51 -0500 Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2717) For Windows 2000 (5.1.2600;3) In-Reply-To: <1575f9f9-95c9-b881-b2b1-79f80381774b@qeng-ho.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: ssl certificate Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 15:43:53 -0000 On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:50:45 +0000, Arthur Chance wrote: >On 19/12/2016 13:48, Simon wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:28:11 +0530 >>> Amitabh Kant wrote: >> >>>> Try https://letsencrypt.org/ . It has a fairly broad acceptance. >>>> =20 >> >> "Today we kicked off our first crowdfunding campaign with the goal >> of raising enough funds to cover about one month of our operations >> - $200,000. " >> >> $200k a month? automated? nonprofit? :D >> >> That isn't free, that is called indirect funding or other people's money. >Exactly like the root DNS servers. Do you have problems with those? No, not exactly. DNS root servers are paid for via domain fees (ICANN). So when I find free domain registration service for my domains it will be just like LE, but until then... ya, I have a problem, I want it free! As long as we're on the same page of being not free, more like donation-supported at the tune of $200k a month! I'm okay with LE concept. People will often call things free when they don't pay for them directly out of pocket. In that sense you can call it free. PS: still looking for free domains, admins, and servers because I believe they ought to be free! -Simon From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 19 15:57:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB25C88F4C for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 15:57:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.20.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5DB198C for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 15:57:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id A1FE5CB8C9E; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 09:57:57 -0600 (CST) Received: from 128.135.52.6 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 09:57:57 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <33573.128.135.52.6.1482163077.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <20161219134903.044CE71804B@kicp.uchicago.edu> References: <20161219134903.044CE71804B@kicp.uchicago.edu> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 09:57:57 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: ssl certificate From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "Simon" Cc: "freebsd-questions" Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 15:57:01 -0000 On Mon, December 19, 2016 7:48 am, Simon wrote: > >>On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 10:28:11 +0530 >>Amitabh Kant wrote: > >>> Try https://letsencrypt.org/ . It has a fairly broad acceptance. >>>=20 > > "Today we kicked off our first crowdfunding campaign with the goal > of raising enough funds to cover about one month of our operations > - $200,000. " > > $200k a month? automated? nonprofit? :D $200k a Month is rather expensive IMHO. We know nothing is free. We know free (in the same sense as in free beer, though the meaning in its name is another "free") FreeBSD has monthly expenses, but probably much smaller. I know (from long existence) FreeBSD likely will still exist and stay free, so I can rely on this prediction and happily run my FreeBSD servers. The Monthly cost of letsencrypt.org, being so high, scares me into scepticism about it be still free (for "customer") and still exist in some future to come. I do use letsencrypt.org for one of our project (they want .org domain), but for the rest of the servers I get (university centrally covered) commercial SSL certificates. And this just suggests to keep it this way. Valeri > > That isn't free, that is called indirect funding or other people's money. > > -Simon > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 19 16:05:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D24C8722A for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:05:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "miucha.iecc.com", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 DV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E3AA1EAA for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:05:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 96637 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2016 16:05:45 -0000 Received: from unknown (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 19 Dec 2016 16:05:45 -0000 Date: 19 Dec 2016 16:05:17 -0000 Message-ID: <20161219160517.18271.qmail@ary.lan> From: "John Levine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: simon@optinet.com Subject: Re: ssl certificate In-Reply-To: <20161219154412.93158.qmail@submit.iecc.com> Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 16:05:45 -0000 >>Exactly like the root DNS servers. Do you have problems with those? > >No, not exactly. DNS root servers are paid for via domain fees (ICANN). Misinformation like this is not helpful. ICANN runs the L root. The other 12 are run by other organizations on essentially a handshake basis, with no money changing hands. >So when I find free domain registration service for my domains it will be >just like LE, but until then... ya, I have a problem, I want it free! You might enjoy .tk. Domains are free, $0. In the meantime, sensible people are all getting their certs from Let's Encrypt. R's, John From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 19 17:02:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5A4C88544 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 17:02:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.20.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82FB1238 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 17:02:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id E9E5DCB8CA4; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:03:48 -0600 (CST) Received: from 128.135.52.6 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:03:48 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <42804.128.135.52.6.1482167028.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <20161219050600.D7AD5718043@kicp.uchicago.edu> References: <20161219050600.D7AD5718043@kicp.uchicago.edu> Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:03:48 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: ssl certificate From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "Simon" Cc: "David Mehler" , "freebsd-questions" Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 17:02:46 -0000 On Sun, December 18, 2016 10:59 pm, Simon wrote: > > Email verified SSLs are down to $5 a year. Which CA authority is his? Thanks. Valeri > > -Simon > > On Sun, 18 Dec 2016 23:54:41 -0500, David Mehler wrote: > >>Hello, > >>Right now I'm doing self-signed ssl certificates, with my own CA. This >>works fine, but might break. I've got a user who will be connecting >>via sftp and via https and who might be put off by the self signed >>aspect. > >>I am wondering if there are any free ssl providers? I know there were >>once some, but thought they went under. I am wanting something free, >>but has a broad browser base, Ios, Android, Kindle, windows etc >>browsers and connection software Es File explorer, filezilla etc. > >>Any suggestions appreciated. > >>Thanks. >>Dave. >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 19 17:55:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A38C88498 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 17:55:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.20.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4C516EE for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 17:55:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id 757F4CB8C9E; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:56:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from 128.135.52.6 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:56:20 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <12862.128.135.52.6.1482170180.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:56:20 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: letsencrypt setup on freebsd From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "David Mehler" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 17:55:18 -0000 On Mon, December 19, 2016 11:32 am, David Mehler wrote: > Hello, > > How did you get letsencrypt set up on FreeBSD? The more I'm reading > the more confusing I'm finding it. Here is what I did (followed mostly these two docs): # https://letsencrypt.org/getting-started/ # https://certbot.eff.org/#freebsd-apache pkg install py27-certbot certbot certonly --webroot -w /usr/local/www/apache24/data -d [your_domain_name].org # Note, that /usr/local/www/apache24/data is webroot of running webserver serving [your_domain_name].org #Certificate and chain have been saved at: /usr/local/etc/letsencrypt/live/cmb-s4.org/fullchain.pem # Now, note that you have to set cron job to renew them as certs # expire after 90 days... # Configure apache vi /usr/local/etc/apache24/extra/httpd-ssl.conf ----- SSLCertificateFile "/usr/local/etc/letsencrypt/live/[your_domain_name].org/cert.pem" SSLCertificateKeyFile "/usr/local/etc/letsencrypt/live/[your_domain_name].org/privkey.pem" SSLCertificateChainFile "/usr/local/etc/letsencrypt/live/[your_domain_name].org/chain.pem" ----- # and restart apache now. # note that there are symlinks: # ls -l /usr/local/etc/letsencrypt/live/[your_domain_name].org/ # and here where actual files are # cd /usr/local/etc/letsencrypt/archive/[your_domain_name].org # check that renew certificate script works /usr/local/bin/certbot renew --dry-run # it only reports about renewing # To not miss the renewal moment, set cronjob twice a day: #crontab -e #----- #27 1,13 * * * /usr/local/bin/certbot renew --quiet #----- # Note that for cron job to work you have to have cron daemon running # I hit this snag as all the above I actually have inside the jail # that runs that service for .org domain I support for on of our projects. # Alternatively you can set cron job outside jail, something like this: crontab -e ----- 27 1,13 * * * /usr/sbin/jexec `/usr/sbin/jls | /usr/bin/grep [your_domain_name_or_rather_jail_name] | /usr/bin/awk '{ print $1 }'` /usr/local/bin/certbot renew --quiet ----- And that should be it. Good luck! Valeri > > Thanks. > Dave. > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Dec 19 20:31:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2B4DC88E31 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:31:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dalescott@shaw.ca) Received: from smtp-out-so.shaw.ca (smtp-out-so.shaw.ca [64.59.136.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 600FE1281 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:31:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dalescott@shaw.ca) Received: from dalet420 ([174.0.43.39]) by shaw.ca with SMTP id J4amcWVICrvfEJ4anckMcI; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:31:29 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shaw.ca; s=s20150330; t=1482179489; bh=otzLo8Tya3I8s1kxlGmrZU3x2GzHP/RQBwD7wPM2AAI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=YXZ+bLrMb35xCp6PXL7lDegzXrPUFRnfvtSn7QDhz5qeJplqe9wQeBxiHnnxX95rq 5QL+gFAXf/tiuwbKQzdbvgrr+am+MkJEhbzdKph4hIkP0d2NbQUeAvHXBewvM1VhDv T4SR0+UoB2hrsi1AVHl/5L4BoLjrkFLp5rnvkv2Ry91ZgkuB4cW86GzCyBY7BZPGEG OhiccHlccib4QKIiFHUESc8pXiHYPlPiuAR2LtTZQvwUscZHWB77F9krBRLJWl4Kqz uSyd4+1wht9Tds+hRrE0bhiNPgHwBlWKCHc73LiSjaL+ToDs7RRIiI8LGMOzwWnBLF t+t/wBjs1C70A== X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=UeUhcOaN c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=TiBur8m8wieNAdBnNdHE5Q==:117 a=TiBur8m8wieNAdBnNdHE5Q==:17 a=DAwyPP_o2Byb1YXLmDAA:9 a=AoeSMSUmAAAA:8 a=1XWaLZrsAAAA:8 a=5mcg790sAAAA:8 a=jU4qhlNgAAAA:8 a=wM0riFMbO3fIUlyj_SMA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=N39g-H9reWkA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=tqHBRAsIgsGn3eyrAgsA:9 a=987u6TnigHqtZAmL:21 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=2UY7SMgi64q-0UtCmZ5F:22 a=nJcEw6yWrPvoIXZ49MH8:22 a=uQeDYW1NI25gHNlrW_eK:22 a=Yzj368saxjB-0pgflKQk:22 a=BKKCjISod1eDJeS0ORpz:22 a=zjWhRoSqWz9hl55Hdlzg:22 From: "Dale Scott" To: Subject: ghdl and compatibility with linux pseudoterminal Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:31:27 -0700 Message-ID: <002101d25a36$e0accac0$a2066040$@shaw.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdJaNVSqRwT6ZPpwQpSBS2BMeiPPfA== Content-Language: en-us X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfPSrP5pLWRjHhGO76OJIkUBgefOiRyx3i86lo3H9yUI77smxthLaZkGPl88Tl90t2f54jxV9KXxxjSQyXRUOODJYo4hzVrD/B+1KUuI+26JKFseb19u1 +kXvQnx0VnmXgTxQqEGAa9HYYJfYa1X9f6YPL8L7ih1B7d6i6ryiI+gu Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:31:37 -0000 Hi, I am trying to use the ghdl package to simulate a micro-coded cpu/sequencer[1] included as part of a FPGA design. The vhdl model for the cpu uses a pseudo-terminal[2] to communicate with the outside world (e.g. using minicom), and ghdl gives an error compiling the cpu with the pseudo-termnal code. Any suggestions? (or a more appropriate list?). dale@whizzer:~/ucodecpu % gmake ghdl -a --ieee=synopsys reg.vhd ghdl -a --ieee=synopsys regfile.vhd ghdl -a --ieee=synopsys alu.vhd ghdl -a --ieee=synopsys prog_cntr.vhd ghdl -a --ieee=synopsys ram.vhd ghdl -a --ieee=synopsys rom.vhd ghdl -a --ieee=synopsys memory.vhd ghdl -a --ieee=synopsys cpu.vhd ghdl -a --ieee=synopsys ulogic.vhd ghdl -a --ieee=synopsys ghdl_uart_pkg.vhd ghdl -a --ieee=synopsys ghdl_uart.vhd ghdl -a --ieee=synopsys ghdl_uart_tb.vhd gcc -c ghdl_pty.c ./uassem full_microcode 2> /dev/null ./gen_rom control.rom 8 32 controlrom.vhd ./gen_rom decision.rom 8 16 decisionrom.vhd ./massem basic_program.s 2> /dev/null ./gen_rom main.rom 14 16 mainrom.vhd ghdl -e -Wl,ghdl_pty.o --ieee=synopsys cpu ghdl: compilation error gmake: *** [Makefile:12: cpu] Error 1 dale@whizzer:~/ucodecpu % Fwiw, I had to comment out the "#include " in ghdl_pty.c as " not found". Thanks, Dale [1] http://minnie.tuhs.org/Programs/UcodeCPU/ghdl_download.html [2] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/alt.sources/25Iy6XQxwBk/ujkYEBm5jrwJ --- Transparency with Trust Blog: http://www.dalescott.net LinkedIn: https://ca.linkedin.com/in/dalescott From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 20 01:36:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B99C887BC for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 01:36:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from citrin+bsd@citrin.ru) Received: from hz.citrin.ru (hz.citrin.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d16:10c3::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3500EA2 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 01:36:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from citrin+bsd@citrin.ru) Received: from x220.lan (c-24-60-168-172.hsd1.ct.comcast.net [24.60.168.172]) by hz.citrin.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A1CAE286ACF for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 01:36:41 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: anyone know what 'ping: sendto: Can't assign requested" means To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Anton Yuzhaninov Message-ID: Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:36:39 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=citrin.ru; s=s0; t=1482197801; bh=lN+JsBVYn5WlUttVbvNwtgnYRr/yxQvkwLMxDuH6gic=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=dQGqqz9CC/lATW0yBolGAcdmLyGTYQv5PfI3igMKntbIl9qFmxlWJDwS1wfQRhI3lqhg6cgmDOuHBbYUnjAPpeYL6fkhiQc1eNFITEv7H4fcO3Wnnzq/vCkwJc6TGDhlxNBn3b9TzFSnq4LcWMqbEmGKpEk+SzFolvsn+N3uUR4= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 01:36:44 -0000 On 12/06/16 13:33, DTD wrote: > > So the question comes down to under what conditions does ping give the > 'sendto: > Can't assign requested address' error. I have not been able to get that to > happen outside of a jailed environment. Outside jails this error happens when you ping address from 127.0.0.0/8 (but not 127.0.0.1) :~> ping 127.0.0.2 PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2): 56 data bytes ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 20 02:15:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA9AC899FB for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 02:15:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milstar2@eml.cc) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EEF4D03 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 02:15:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milstar2@eml.cc) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7E4C0C899FA; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 02:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF55C899F9 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 02:15:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milstar2@eml.cc) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55ACFD02 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 02:15:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milstar2@eml.cc) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569CE207AC for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 21:15:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from web1 ([10.202.2.211]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 19 Dec 2016 21:15:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eml.cc; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= mesmtp; bh=MXwUAT8OwTSltkQBMFWiYfh3ZK0=; b=RUFVNF/1ilsik2XFfqn1J y9+diEgCezlrGBtGkHjZybec1VfqP9R/Fcj8v5qdtgo6MEApwhUdxpQHPjGctWqn Vqiw6tShCfEzB0Fp7BrA8Dk6pM3g1kt1p09mahhuasWACbwSajyqqyinq9N/iHVT RFz/vr3e7tFBCrFir7rbwQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=MXwUAT8OwTSltkQBMFWiYfh3Z K0=; b=XEv/ZolQhY8Jdqr301zUJHbYMC+JEmFRe/qmSe/1W5j6aICLcZToVVcL0 Kqv9ARDjfrLkbRXLsfd+gAQdPofryK7PwTBXXUxhfBN9iLwgWKmbN6yrICMNYV9O 334gQfk9IbQ/0InmoiGqT2YpAa7cRNcbYEl+Y3DEgfpJjbxLDY= X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 30126AA6C5; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 21:15:18 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1482200118.1106059.824327441.01A23424@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: swjatoslaw gerus To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-85983a1c Subject: Comparsion of Solaris , FreeBSD ,Ubuntu Default profile ,bash profile ,bashrc,xinitrc,bash-logout .Xauthority X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <1482200016.1105926.824310673.307BAC4A@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 03:15:18 +0100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 02:15:19 -0000 re: Comparsion of Solaris , FreeBSD ,Ubuntu Default profile ,bash profile ,bashrc,xinitrc,bash-logout .Xauthority & Gentlemen Author of this e-mail have questions about user profile & What must be in user directory ? And what must not be ? #################################################### Author is root but will limit risk -test all in user directory before change system Conditions of test -one user login -start two xterm -xterm -fg green -bg black & keyboard change for user - .Xmodmap PS change for user PS1="*" wine + programm.exe - set/export path for virtual drive .wine/drive_c/program/PP/bin Sony vgn -31 notebook (64 bit 2*2.4 ghz ) to date Ubuntu 16 but lot of problem ... Relevant comment would appreciated -- http://www.fastmail.com - Access all of your messages and folders wherever you are -- http://www.fastmail.com - Email service worth paying for. Try it for free From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 20 03:04:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451F0C89845 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 03:04:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C347A85 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 03:04:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2B809C89844; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 03:04:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B215C89843 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 03:04:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mailrelay10.qsc.de (mailrelay10.qsc.de [212.99.163.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.antispameurope.com", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A666CA83 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 03:04:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de ([213.148.129.14]) by mailrelay10.qsc.de; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:04:04 +0100 Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-28-64.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.28.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 672D23CBF9; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:03:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id uBK33mPm004221; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:03:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:03:48 +0100 From: Polytropon To: swjatoslaw gerus Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Comparsion of Solaris , FreeBSD ,Ubuntu Default profile ,bash profile ,bashrc,xinitrc,bash-logout .Xauthority Message-Id: <20161220040348.c8e60a69.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1482200118.1106059.824327441.01A23424@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1482200118.1106059.824327441.01A23424@webmail.messagingengine.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-cloud-security-sender: freebsd@edvax.de X-cloud-security-recipient: questions@freebsd.org X-cloud-security-Virusscan: CLEAN X-cloud-security-disclaimer: This E-Mail was scanned by E-Mailservice on mailrelay10.qsc.de with 371766834BD X-cloud-security-connect: mx01.qsc.de[213.148.129.14], TLS=1, IP=213.148.129.14 X-cloud-security: scantime:.2235 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 03:04:51 -0000 On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 03:15:18 +0100, swjatoslaw gerus wrote: > re: Comparsion of Solaris , FreeBSD ,Ubuntu > Default profile ,bash profile ,bashrc,xinitrc,bash-logout > .Xauthority & > > Gentlemen > > Author of this e-mail have questions about user profile & > > What must be in user directory ? And what must not be ? Basically, bash configuration files are not provided with FreeBSD, because bash is not part of the operating system. It can be installed as an additional component. FreeBSD's default dialog shell is the C shell (tcsh), with the configuration files /etc/csh.cshrc, /etc/csh.login, /etc/csh.logout (global files) and ~/.cshrc, ~/.login, ~/.logout (user-specific files). The way they are interpreted (e. g., startup file for login shell, interactive shell, or _any_ shell, such as scripting shell invocations) is explained in "man csh". For sh, FreeBSD's default scripting shell, ~/.shrc and ~/.profile are provided according to "man sh". If you install bash, you can also check "man bash" for the use of the files ~/.bashrc, ~/.bash_profile, ~/.bash_login and their system-wide equivalents in /etc (or /usr/local/etc). There are other popular shells you can install, for example zsh or ksh. Those are optional in the view of the operating system. So whatever file is relevant depends on what shell you are using. > Author is root but will limit risk -test all in user directory > before change system > > Conditions of test -one user > > login -start two xterm -xterm -fg green -bg black & > keyboard change for user - .Xmodmap Those entries look like they belong into an X startup file, ~/xinitrc (when you're using "startx") or ~/.xsession (when you're using a display manager such as XDM). > PS change for user PS1="*" That's a strange prompt. :-) In bash, prompt settings usually go to ~/.bashrc; this is a typical setting: PS1="\u@\h:\w\$ " In csh, you can use ~/.cshrc for this purpose: set promptchars = "%#" set prompt = "%n@%m:%~%# " If you wish to use a different shell, check its manual for how to configure the prompt in that shell. > wine + programm.exe - set/export path for virtual drive > .wine/drive_c/program/PP/bin That is possible to setup in a login shell's configuration. Note that is also possible to set $PATH independently from the shell in use: ~/.login_conf can do this. See "man login.conf" for details. > Sony vgn -31 notebook > (64 bit 2*2.4 ghz ) to date Ubuntu 16 but lot of problem ... Even though I've tried to answer with the focus on FreeBSD (which this mailing list is intended for), you can probably translate my advice to any Linux or UNIX operating system. Always check your local documentation. > Relevant comment would appreciated Please try to be more specific in your question, it's not that easy to understand, sorry. (I'm not a native english speaker, so I might have missed what you wanted to ask...) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 20 04:13:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2F3DC87389 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:13:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexmiroslav@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua0-x235.google.com (mail-ua0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD7D912D4 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:13:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexmiroslav@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ua0-x235.google.com with SMTP id b56so5912846uaa.0 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:13:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4HAbMThghZpGPsVD9NMvf4Ew40IkviWye3+j/cOWeS4=; b=hP267IU80OAq/7H7yYodJx1cw/OsRqyCqU/Zvoc8WMtJ4MHZ3qruAdiVVDhp3zRIx6 rPk64/BHJj3/DBwo69LUSvjIKsmmJOcMhijDsIKOk+OjOq1HGfBHGA1JjQF5+qJRAGtj /HnhgghqRTsEbMmYmZUC8lpSwXApTJ+avcw4/BLeLORYwGaNCxo3DIG43Cy0hPGsDvpX jiVG3M0dh5tav0iGLEMUjpl2vJJAoUshRDHJO47IqJcUSntX80u1pYIzpY5Vel1MWb7T QBbtrwRJWIWfgWtud6Y/R9D8mlOQQdVpiEr/Ejl+wEyJgAZ07zLuL8BUKX5LDYtxc+wP ppJA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=4HAbMThghZpGPsVD9NMvf4Ew40IkviWye3+j/cOWeS4=; b=oo8h5Vki4FzTjm0MWBSbWhBfhJrhZzi+wJ38SeQc6i6SkEAYBrN6DEl3I8Ma4rGFgM J2GaFxR8D7xLiGFy2AEb97EqBFlYL18zY1iieyAg53MZOitASeOMRtnQ0qj+hP2Z9yU8 xH7gvhDBVf6DWDQunhRb68xiPoK5rh6LprTCVvjo8fD5XQ/Zlm2B60uwJd4XZtfsf2dZ 18FMr3693r+3PlyJ1K/mZTBIFJN1qt+STSyyL/4UwMTZqxEHl9Sj48XUAyqXUBEDT+Ph /aei55OCmwIaLNpIOVMAAjP+VdXPJn8sACrVSFiKJi3uE06zA7EV4FZyiTooknqXLT3q 4pKw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLfg6O/56offFt1yyDlFJwB8jYEiPVNsz0gsWWDyZwUfEe8ebUxrzuXzXfNYRVTN/EbCPW/4XvAU4D3fw== X-Received: by 10.176.85.158 with SMTP id v30mr13144752uaa.36.1482207202678; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:13:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.39.130 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:13:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Aleksandr Miroslav Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:13:22 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: zfs (zxfer) replication -- "holes" in backups? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:13:24 -0000 On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote: > I'm using a pkg called zfstools to take my snapshots. It takes snapshots > called frequent, hourly, daily, weekly, and monthly. > The problem may have been even more sillier. The snapshots taken by the package zfstools depends on this property: $ zfs get all zroot/usr/home|grep auto-snapshot zroot/usr/home com.sun:auto-snapshot true local It turns out that when I sent my snapshots to my backup machine, I never turned off this property, the backup machine also had zfstools installed, and so was taking snapshots of my backupsnaphots. Hence the holes. I've since cleaned this up, and will let backups run for a few days and see if this fixes the problem. Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 20 05:05:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2622C893D7 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 05:05:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [198.74.231.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B61CE1BA8 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 05:05:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [198.74.231.63]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24C164800A; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:05:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (doug@localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id uBK55w1T025343; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:05:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id uBK55wag025340; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:05:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:05:58 -0500 (EST) From: doug Reply-To: doug@safeport.com To: Anton Yuzhaninov cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: anyone know what 'ping: sendto: Can't assign requested" means In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:05:58 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 05:06:00 -0000 On Mon, 19 Dec 2016, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: > On 12/06/16 13:33, DTD wrote: >> >> So the question comes down to under what conditions does ping give the >> 'sendto: >> Can't assign requested address' error. I have not been able to get that to >> happen outside of a jailed environment. > > Outside jails this error happens when you ping address from 127.0.0.0/8 (but > not 127.0.0.1) > > :~> ping 127.0.0.2 > PING 127.0.0.2 (127.0.0.2): 56 data bytes > ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address Sorry to be dense but I do not understand the comment. I have a LAN with a few hosts: 192.168.2.1 (ISP gateway) tardis.boltsys.com (192.168.2.22) lilac.boltsys.com (192.168.2.44) zeus.boltsys.com (192.168.2.45) thor.boltsys.com (192.168.2.104) 192.168.2.105 hphub.boltsys.com (192.168.2.106) 192.168.2.107 gaia.boltsys.com (192.168.2.110) gsscc.boltsys.com (192.168.2.111) odin.boltsys.com (192.168.2.112) aether.boltsys.com (192.168.2.113) chaos.boltsys.com (192.168.2.117) pontos.boltsys.com (192.168.2.118) 192.168.2.120 192.168.2.125 artemis.boltsys.com (192.168.2.102) The jail host is chaos, jails are gaia, gsscc, and pontos. Without showing examples of all the pings, what I have is that any jail can ping the other jails and the host but can not ping any other host in 192.168.2.0/24, e.g., using gaia: em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=4219b ether c8:9c:dc:eb:ab:fb inet 192.168.2.110 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.2.110 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=600003 lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=600003 inet 127.0.1.1 netmask 0xffffffff gaia:~> ping -c 1 gsscc PING gsscc.boltsys.com (192.168.2.111): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.2.111: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.025 ms -- gaia:~> ping -c 1 pontos PING pontos.boltsys.com (192.168.2.118): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.2.118: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.021 ms --- gaia:~> ping -c 1 artemis PING artemis.boltsys.com (192.168.2.102): 56 data bytes ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address pinging localhost works gaia:~> ping -c 1 localhost PING localhost (127.0.1.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 127.0.1.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.027 ms and (obviously) gaia:~> ping -c 1 microosoft.com PING microosoft.com (52.178.167.109): 56 data bytes ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address Does not. So either that's the way it is suppost to work or there is a 9.3 bug. I assume I could use chaos as a gateway and use NAT via pf/ipfw but thats not worth the effort in the production systems, I can just ping from the host. So my question stands. I can not find out what that error means and do not know how to reproduce it outside of a jail. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 20 08:10:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28FFAC86433 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dualdanismanlik@sendsmail.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5C21069 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dualdanismanlik@sendsmail.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0AA04C86432; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:10:41 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3BBC86431 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dualdanismanlik@sendsmail.net) Received: from g2-s77.valuezon.com (g2-s77.valuezon.com [82.222.187.77]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B0D1068 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:10:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dualdanismanlik@sendsmail.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=g2-s77.valuezon.com; i=@g2-s77.valuezon.com; q=dns/txt; s=valuemail; t=1482221439; h=MIME-Version : Content-Type : Content-Transfer-Encoding : Date : Subject : From : Reply-to : To : List-Unsubscribe : List-ID : Message-ID : Date : Subject : From; bh=VpMwmXp8/U+yBLDaETMx7Ln9ktqVpJkhDlJrjr/6Hpk=; b=RW14Qip0qkxwE4XVgYwlYa8D+jmQib6ceOze/N3mIdq7stUFysfOspJOIqvPFVxF6dp7ff RfwvULD6t2Nw/FOtcriMNgdUxna3ZfR3jIFadCWdcFAl94tskoBxuci+DhAvfImF/Ue1Hlog KllaZ7hIydqvZnMgi4rcnfEoI6Mxs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 10:10:39 +0200 Subject: =?utf-8?b?S3VydW11bnV6dSB2ZSDDh2FsxLHFn2FubGFyxLFuxLF6xLEgWWFzYWwgT2xh?= =?utf-8?b?cmFrIEtvcnVtYSBBbHTEsW5hIEFsZMSxbsSxeiBtxLE/?= From: "=?utf-8?q?Dual_-_Kurumsal_Koruma_Program=C4=B1?=" Reply-to: "=?utf-8?q?Dual_-_Kurumsal_Koruma_Program=C4=B1?=" To: X-OriginalSentTime: 2016-12-20 10:10:39.230476 X-OriginalRecipient: X-Platform: 113117101115116105111110115064102114101101098115100046111114103 Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:10:41 -0000 S3VydW11bnV6dSB2ZSDDh2FsxLHFn2FubGFyxLFuxLF6xLEgWWFzYWwgT2xhcmFrIEtvcnVtYSBB bHTEsW5hIEFsZMSxbsSxeiBtxLE/IApodHRwczovL3N0b3JhZ2UuZ29vZ2xlYXBpcy5jb20vdmFs dWV6b24vc2NyaXB0cy9jLmh0bWw/bWlkPTE3NzgtMTMtODgxODM2LTE5LTgtMTkyMTY4MjE5LTE5 NzYyNjcwJmxpZD03MiZpPTE3NzgmYz0xNzc4Jng9MTEzMTE3MTAxMTE1MTE2MTA1MTExMTEwMTE1 MDY0MTAyMTE0MTAxMTAxMDk4MTE1MTAwMDQ2MTExMTE0MTAzJnQ9VFhUJnA9MiZtPTEzJmI9MCZh PTEmZz0xMSZsPTEwNDExNjExNjExMjA1ODA0NzA0NzExNTEwMTExMDEwMDExNTEwOTA5NzEwNTEw ODA0NjExMDEwMTExNiZscD0vcG9ydGFsLzE3NzgtMTMtODgxODM2LTE5LTgtMTkyMTY4MjE5LTE5 NzYyNjcwLzAvVFIvTUVTU0FHRQpEdWFsIERhbsSxxZ9tYW5sxLFrIEEuxZ4uIHwgMDIxMiAyMTUg NTQgNzYgfCB3d3cuZHVhbGRhbmlzbWFubGlrLmNvbS50ciB8ICB8IA0KIA0KIA== From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 20 12:36:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0409BC87FD6 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:36:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmatalka@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x244.google.com (mail-wm0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81EFD1E2E for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:36:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmatalka@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x244.google.com with SMTP id m203so24039911wma.3 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:36:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=9N3yp2/M/KzDy02QMTIKxeuCusGfvfv3R3L24J0bVlg=; b=mhwZm7Pez+9lQILvlt/Jo7/mt9CwcSmytAn7irOOk0rZyAMU0Y5mUAXcnzA7y0Ztad hSAEAsOcOl+s3AC9iGHcRsocWBYVAo1Hvjt1Uz/EREdkb16R98evlpc584iG9HYtdQyR LQGXp2rxCKB/LMjQukUrh+x6VFCF/JIuRaRk9gAkrGAEfHBb0UBUBp2ESr4xAQEMYTMG LTj1jzeyv+JUyj/qMwWbdTNhFiV93mpHcoN+0aA2ndM0Crl+sRMRiqcUw/4tGiC68NUL x+ki3+shZUbF7uBMc4N8sr8jaKUZbcHgky2LVD3T9z213lLqjWiM+ln7snGpzsrXV5hF D4Lw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=9N3yp2/M/KzDy02QMTIKxeuCusGfvfv3R3L24J0bVlg=; b=Dde+i6nA28QwLq59k7kMr7Qi29dOIhT0YF55WPIfmaNqwRE5nuxsRyA5ZolAOop1lh NF5v7+yV8fxdA78x3dVUGt4ERgAC21XsyB60DU1RfMhO9vz/4mSqiCeucrO916yOqPts /HQlL5+rYp7DhlXFae6l5JmAst9v1MwgzEBHt/Gp14kK4zay9Jw8ZpklQUpddcyGNhPZ /oPUHM+Qk7jjzSDmyWKA/II5UbcYabyY1QS/su5fCNqxUBsRtfPMJvXSZmH9gO9TeykE 3ntQgx5CdocNPTWtY2CEBy1FksSJUZtyAWXl7rIshNNPF7T9tOM1OO49opXTWPEToKYo r5zg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLruK8LJTUMyBYzllfYa9p1eJ0LzpgMsJE6XMKvUpBryxIVhTWsUI1BzCmMLLK0eQ== X-Received: by 10.28.9.80 with SMTP id 77mr1821922wmj.68.1482237415080; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:36:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([37.153.108.22]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e188sm21967908wma.21.2016.12.20.04.36.53 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:36:53 -0800 (PST) From: Malcolm Matalka To: Aleksandr Miroslav Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs (zxfer) replication -- "holes" in backups? References: Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:36:52 +0000 In-Reply-To: (Aleksandr Miroslav's message of "Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:13:22 -0800") Message-ID: <867f6u22vv.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:36:57 -0000 Aleksandr Miroslav writes: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Aleksandr Miroslav > wrote: > >> I'm using a pkg called zfstools to take my snapshots. It takes snapshots >> called frequent, hourly, daily, weekly, and monthly. >> > > The problem may have been even more sillier. The snapshots taken by the > package zfstools depends on this property: > > $ zfs get all zroot/usr/home|grep auto-snapshot > zroot/usr/home com.sun:auto-snapshot true local > > It turns out that when I sent my snapshots to my backup machine, I never > turned off this property, the backup machine also had zfstools installed, > and so was taking snapshots of my backupsnaphots. Hence the holes. I've > since cleaned this up, and will let backups run for a few days and see if > this fixes the problem. I ran into this problem where the snapshots the machine that was backing up to named the snapshots the same thing so zxfer thought the transfer didn't need to happen. I "solved" this by putting the hostname in the snapshot name. There is probably a better way though. > > Alex > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 20 14:33:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46CF8C88146 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:33:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milstar2@eml.cc) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A96C1961 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:33:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milstar2@eml.cc) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 26DD3C88145; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D10C88143 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:33:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milstar2@eml.cc) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5F241960 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:33:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milstar2@eml.cc) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C4D9208B2 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:33:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:33:52 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eml.cc; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= mesmtp; bh=dNAZkNDbEnUl4lU1NQSFMbNXiTk=; b=QY/DKcEhiJVwSwdt91vzc VoR+vqbErBp0oeNhSLJ4MXnlbc4cHZsz0/fMxyRkOutW3v19U49eiB5IsCLAnGXf b8BvgZR+ArkPWwVdzJnN4TEk2dyMEAcR7uAIyxx54d4pM6qo0azeCbbhx4Gy0yW4 LD8D2StRt/++VjS/TNSafE= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=dNAZkNDbEnUl4lU1NQSFMbNXi Tk=; b=mq69fcwrsmd1tY+pp77bho7u/GzyomMufROCARQb6W38CdBXLd7Kc7Okw 6BsTUgphb/0mqTAkyEqE58UwlBmN+Q9gn0xMu58YQ1jMfKsPrqfb+bAMZ1E4DkkA rOVufOKHsLUPsIjFsipxUH1AjEeXrPCb+PhYKFHDi8iaZKVVdA= X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 3F35B9ED4B; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:33:52 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1482244432.3461389.824840089.25391E79@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: swjatoslaw gerus To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-85983a1c Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:33:52 +0100 Subject: Fwd: Dear Sir please inform author about installation of freebsd 1. from network direct 2.if not possible -network+dvd X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <1482244391.3461324.824833529.5D94DC49@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:33:54 -0000 Dear Sir Please inform author about installation of freebsd (english) 1. from network direct 2.if not possible -network+dvd sony vgn-31 2*2.4 ghz , 4gb +256 gb https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ek5BslaS7DM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Spe_r_c6y8 -- swjatoslaw gerus milstar2@eml.cc ----- Original message ----- From: Polytropon To: swjatoslaw gerus Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Comparsion of Solaris , FreeBSD ,Ubuntu Default profile ,bash profile ,bashrc,xinitrc,bash-logout .Xauthority Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:03:48 +0100 On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 03:15:18 +0100, swjatoslaw gerus wrote: > re: Comparsion of Solaris , FreeBSD ,Ubuntu > Default profile ,bash profile ,bashrc,xinitrc,bash-logout > .Xauthority & > > Gentlemen > > Author of this e-mail have questions about user profile & > > What must be in user directory ? And what must not be ? Basically, bash configuration files are not provided with FreeBSD, because bash is not part of the operating system. It can be installed as an additional component. FreeBSD's default dialog shell is the C shell (tcsh), with the configuration files /etc/csh.cshrc, /etc/csh.login, /etc/csh.logout (global files) and ~/.cshrc, ~/.login, ~/.logout (user-specific files). The way they are interpreted (e. g., startup file for login shell, interactive shell, or _any_ shell, such as scripting shell invocations) is explained in "man csh". For sh, FreeBSD's default scripting shell, ~/.shrc and ~/.profile are provided according to "man sh". If you install bash, you can also check "man bash" for the use of the files ~/.bashrc, ~/.bash_profile, ~/.bash_login and their system-wide equivalents in /etc (or /usr/local/etc). There are other popular shells you can install, for example zsh or ksh. Those are optional in the view of the operating system. So whatever file is relevant depends on what shell you are using. > Author is root but will limit risk -test all in user directory > before change system > > Conditions of test -one user > > login -start two xterm -xterm -fg green -bg black & > keyboard change for user - .Xmodmap Those entries look like they belong into an X startup file, ~/xinitrc (when you're using "startx") or ~/.xsession (when you're using a display manager such as XDM). > PS change for user PS1="*" That's a strange prompt. :-) In bash, prompt settings usually go to ~/.bashrc; this is a typical setting: PS1="\u@\h:\w\$ " In csh, you can use ~/.cshrc for this purpose: set promptchars = "%#" set prompt = "%n@%m:%~%# " If you wish to use a different shell, check its manual for how to configure the prompt in that shell. > wine + programm.exe - set/export path for virtual drive > .wine/drive_c/program/PP/bin That is possible to setup in a login shell's configuration. Note that is also possible to set $PATH independently from the shell in use: ~/.login_conf can do this. See "man login.conf" for details. > Sony vgn -31 notebook > (64 bit 2*2.4 ghz ) to date Ubuntu 16 but lot of problem ... Even though I've tried to answer with the focus on FreeBSD (which this mailing list is intended for), you can probably translate my advice to any Linux or UNIX operating system. Always check your local documentation. > Relevant comment would appreciated Please try to be more specific in your question, it's not that easy to understand, sorry. (I'm not a native english speaker, so I might have missed what you wanted to ask...) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... -- http://www.fastmail.com - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service -- http://www.fastmail.com - Send your email first class From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 20 14:50:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4490FC88851 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:50:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9888179 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:50:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id uBKEnwFq019751; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 01:49:59 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 01:49:58 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: John Levine cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, simon@optinet.com Subject: Re: ssl certificate In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20161221012013.T26979@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:50:13 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 655, Issue 2, Message: 7 On 19 Dec 2016 16:05:17 -0000 "John Levine" wrote: [..] Simon sayeth: > >So when I find free domain registration service for my domains it will be > >just like LE, but until then... ya, I have a problem, I want it free! > You might enjoy .tk. Domains are free, $0. Spammers are certainly enjoying them; ${random.alphabet.soup}.tk are lately probing here. I tried locating one after noticing gmail noisily rejecting a .forward for a user. Registrant details hidden, of course. Connect:tk ERROR:"550 unaccountable domain rejected" > In the meantime, sensible people are all getting their certs from > Let's Encrypt. >From your earlier message: > There are a bunch of different open source clients for LE. I use a > cute little shell script called acme.sh for the web and mail certs on > my fbsd system. The certs have to be renewed every 3 months so you > definitely want to set it up so it can renew automatically. > > https://github.com/Neilpang/acme.sh Thanks for info and link. I'll give you 'cute', dunno about 'little' :) cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 20 15:54:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04146C89E79 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:54:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.20.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84B3D3B for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:54:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id 06DDACB8CA5; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:55:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from 128.135.52.6 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:55:33 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <53371.128.135.52.6.1482249333.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <20161221012013.T26979@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20161221012013.T26979@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:55:33 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: ssl certificate From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: "Ian Smith" Cc: "John Levine" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, simon@optinet.com Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:54:30 -0000 On Tue, December 20, 2016 8:49 am, Ian Smith wrote: > In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 655, Issue 2, Message: 7 > On 19 Dec 2016 16:05:17 -0000 "John Levine" wrote: > > [..] > > Simon sayeth: > > > >So when I find free domain registration service for my domains it will > be > > >just like LE, but until then... ya, I have a problem, I want it free! > > > You might enjoy .tk. Domains are free, $0. > > Spammers are certainly enjoying them; ${random.alphabet.soup}.tk are > lately probing here. I tried locating one after noticing gmail noisily > rejecting a .forward for a user. Registrant details hidden, of course. > > Connect:tk ERROR:"550 unaccountable domain rejected" Indeed. Once free/almost free "generic" top domains emerged like .pro, .blog, .tech, .design, ... spammers immediately jumped in and started using them for their wrongdoings. I have a feeling that these domains were specifically made for their advantage. Immediately I had to adjust spam settings to make all originating from these go to Junk. It was really short consideration after which I was quite certain that no serious person willing to communicate serious matter will use these - not in my book. Valeri > > > In the meantime, sensible people are all getting their certs from > > Let's Encrypt. > >>From your earlier message: > > > There are a bunch of different open source clients for LE. I use a > > cute little shell script called acme.sh for the web and mail certs on > > my fbsd system. The certs have to be renewed every 3 months so you > > definitely want to set it up so it can renew automatically. > > > > https://github.com/Neilpang/acme.sh > > Thanks for info and link. I'll give you 'cute', dunno about 'little' :) > > cheers, Ian > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 20 16:16:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1263FC89274 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:16:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from citrin+bsd@citrin.ru) Received: from hz.citrin.ru (hz.citrin.ru [88.198.212.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C02D1187B for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from citrin+bsd@citrin.ru) Received: from x220.lan (c-24-60-168-172.hsd1.ct.comcast.net [24.60.168.172]) by hz.citrin.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7FC70286AB2 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: blacklistd(8) - entries don't removed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5ee1dcc7-643b-a7b1-7d1c-1017599bdfe5@citrin.ru> <5844BA83.8030601@gmail.com> From: Anton Yuzhaninov Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 11:16:29 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5844BA83.8030601@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=citrin.ru; s=s0; t=1482250590; bh=tApbf/n3b7Vcy8GTdj2JlpUaAFnajquC1BgbI1zo5yA=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=4EezOBzgyRR3QlRyjpHJYpl1gj+2+PBok9TYvIDbGiz2AfeklExserqO7C/okd5pGLkKmY+IKD3eDmdx+GOZSurMYgHZIZt6l0GykhBlbDv1MOoROcm1yqOQeE31dQxoCLOoMplj/OmdLOcZRLbYKHe8pKLJNm1VkMb7X1Sdi/4= X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:16:40 -0000 On 12/04/16 19:53, Ernie Luzar wrote: > Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: >> I started to use blacklistd(8) to protect sshd from bruteforce. >> >> Entries are added to ipfw table via controlprog but never removed. >> >> Blocked hosts after some time are removed from state database but even in >> blacklistd -C /usr/local/libexec/blacklistd-helper -r -d -v >> I see no attempts to run blacklistd-helper rem It turned out, that blacklistd expects string OK from blacklistd-helper script. echo 'OK' in script is workaround working for me. Some time ago this was committed to head: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/306695 This behavior of blacklistd is unexpected and undocumented in man though. > Seems your the first person to use this new function in 11.0. Read its > man page for email of person who ported this from openbsd and contact > him directly. It was ported from NetBSD and in NetBSD 7.0.2 blacklistd has the same problem - script should print 'OK' string. I don't like this, but it seems to be not a bug, but a bad designed feature. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 20 16:58:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F11DC8923A for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:58:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wj0-x232.google.com (mail-wj0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c01::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38DDD1B15 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:58:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wj0-x232.google.com with SMTP id tg4so182791176wjb.1 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:58:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XhxbEONAcbbuiYumeiy3s3d4hkPcm3HSFgUGKkBUaGk=; b=PYwDo+OzCR6MVeSvClxTnMdwRz30d1etpyZOIMrMHx2ErKfw5e4F4O2rrRpprNbA7Q XSdD7UeAXDPrc8UYIwmibMjjv39X6lpNuh5y85qnI+wdRA/bAyMnnUO2/+Y0OAZdCMtP fNPw7IC07MKPDABzRIGlESVUWXv6w3dHtzAjAGxedHi7qCVsujHEHPLX2zQYCyABfJ0i KKfOODSlmWlaBDzn1BI3kpeCL6PcG2yCWI5oXKQeLviDdadr0GXTgYJ69tsRd0e7QAdR Wl9kBwb5WWuL77BqYi132fnIQc2jM85NSlk1q0+nrNIpSq0KtkF3bU2nrlPVhLP/5/9t XSPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XhxbEONAcbbuiYumeiy3s3d4hkPcm3HSFgUGKkBUaGk=; b=JZaNlO/y4CWKgJmsDfOfUtxlL2j7gD8peSdFjosAh8AV9X7m1fqM3mc0WbhhYuVPu3 NalfkAA+X0cWPYrfTbJGZZM+9u2LUDcHyhV67hnJ+SW20Rl7eSrz5BIGgxllgrps5eJa /kuHpjLA9KQ0W1daYh+3VAw7RnRHuXanSzGrVGXPBEmnvRMk//rKrjtwUfnz3JV3sBC8 8iWTEOfv7WONlrUvg5CfBLjMgTNzf4ygtBYrBsW+SuOxVH2xWzwicgl9Pnaj5oKsmg0W SiYH2tiK2KCSoY1o4G+Zxx7MfJAk+Fp8XYQmwIBCXAD4VPEbCGnlF1u2cjzwPq8hzZ7e 11VQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXL+lmuvFYRg9LgFxrgsnS4RvaanSIm4IKquaAc72rgufIfOrxaAKwFvUZAb+XMD4XB4NpUxP+yN3TYSzA== X-Received: by 10.194.177.231 with SMTP id ct7mr196916wjc.221.1482253084513; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:58:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.169.195 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:58:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Adam Vande More Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 10:58:04 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: anyone know what 'ping: sendto: Can't assign requested" means To: DTD Cc: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:58:06 -0000 On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:33 PM, DTD wrote: > For truth in advertising this is pinging from a jail. The problem is > limited to pinging outside of the jailed environment. I took a shot a the > ping source to see if there was an illuminating comment around the message > but got lost in tacking this through libc source. > > I can show this is not a routing issue and the jails can ping. Our LAN has > a > dozen or so devices all in the network 192.168.2.0/24. To demonstrate the > problem I used two hosts in the LAN and some external systems. The jail > environment is chaos (host) and two jails, gaia and gsscc. First, from > either > jail all the above is ping-able: > > From gaia: > > gaia:~> ping -c 2 chaos > PING chaos.boltsys.com (192.168.2.117): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.117: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.020 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.117: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.047 ms > > --- chaos.boltsys.com ping statistics --- > 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.020/0.034/0.047/0.013 ms > gaia:~> ping -c 2 gsscc > PING gsscc.boltsys.com (192.168.2.111): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.111: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.022 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.111: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.023 ms > > artemis is a host on the 192.168.2.0/24: > > gaia:~> ping -c 2 artemis > PING artemis.boltsys.com (192.168.2.102): 56 data bytes > ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address > ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address > > The message indicates it can't use the correct source address eg ping -S -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 20 17:13:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7DF4C89CDD for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:13:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "miucha.iecc.com", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 DV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E446A89 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:13:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 49876 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2016 17:13:51 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-type:user-agent; s=c2d3.585966cf.k1612; bh=Nl492nSarBnDSLDkKF0UHVs2pdyn12BzsbQql6akuyY=; b=E6qDCoS2+yXcXvGTjQZ8zw2zVo9ys6PQRc1DrjEoZsl+1XFRLojw4gDc6Eh9BISBllhOqokK9f3tbwc8bNykSpRUZu5VclfJoW0pxC3D36FOjHO6m2jBk63zAsTU5Q8UvxBt2koAgAxwRd9ELhZJ9xg1kA0WtoeplpCe62Gj9RtaIOXxHlnP0qYdIL5xAeQ8G1N7Op8pvwe4xTODwv5SwZEijEhGKBzesyN9m/jSeHXVNZGSa6mI51I7E/XTdJY+ Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTPS (TLS1.0/X.509/SHA1) via TCP6; 20 Dec 2016 17:13:51 -0000 Date: 20 Dec 2016 12:13:45 -0500 Message-ID: From: "John R. Levine" To: "Valeri Galtsev" Cc: "Ian Smith" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cheap domain and ssl certificate In-Reply-To: <53371.128.135.52.6.1482249333.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> References: <20161221012013.T26979@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <53371.128.135.52.6.1482249333.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (OSX 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:13:47 -0000 > Indeed. Once free/almost free "generic" top domains emerged like .pro, > .blog, .tech, .design, ... spammers immediately jumped in and started > using them for their wrongdoings. I have a feeling that these domains were > specifically made for their advantage. ... Having met some of the people who run these domains, I'd say you overestimate their ability to plan ahead. What generally happens is that they had a business plan and revenue projections which they missed because their domains serve no actual need. So they panic and have a cut price fire sale, at which point it's utterly predictable that the only customers interested in bulk cheap domains are crooks. Let's Encrypt, on the other hand, was intended from the start not to charge so their system is working the way it's intended to. Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 20 17:35:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1508C892B8 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:35:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from diane.neal@expertdetailsoftware.xyz) Received: from mail-pf0-x22b.google.com (mail-pf0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BECE412E0 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:35:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from diane.neal@expertdetailsoftware.xyz) Received: by mail-pf0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id c4so30026655pfb.1 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:35:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=expertdetailsoftware-xyz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DScytkxBrjXPRZKUdh15kdM+N+YMMUNH2SE6Ow33cVA=; b=GEW1sU/9K5NRAWL8pqDDLUVhnmh/LjWUXM9tvz96XJFb4lVHm8v32rF8f1D+7JF2og fF7KavLSXn7llato5jmraHlZfrodeUFRhS7sl6BnVPNP0BdDVMtGP29LExjEBh8y1gbW sj0Zfxspk/JkrrGS5fZqpnn7jm9n+oSPOXJLVtKA3cCzHj92ShbnBAON3Rqici4zTpyY oj2nT/++csSVFDkErywt42zfcqaKNcCSV7TXC5JnR1/qX/UO8TmEyS+P2aX/wWO+u05J WZxGvhCAG5cqXol2NGGyYAtuWoiECKvChVGtgnnUZsLokff8aRl2xwn7/cZdSLadiFcv pqhg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DScytkxBrjXPRZKUdh15kdM+N+YMMUNH2SE6Ow33cVA=; b=U2GamJL6haKLWYmCnJVxuXHKwwdbEFLYwomqcv2SUaSUdX/LXHoXa4am5r84xAvJS/ XzVFoMSicyVuE+uf7H9WsHRjN4+6TytuLuhSIUB/sz7NvKFixL5LQYO96M0ob1twJHHb S3lIYVbxtA4bkDkPswVXE32OOabbXSVAJ1/bcmUgUudNrfVsCNU1vKS1AoQJ0yL28SuN ARbxxG/SmRWOBL41i8Kx2MNn70rBXroy6rHjJ08fLrjg5mJHQOm9hN6A1zeBUl0K422N nZp9BxI4NDR2g7Iwxk3Kgkw+NYYyan8itBDZA8G9QqHKxLWUvYcf+F/8+lKVgqtWtqqt k4qw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJCJAukUdkLTv7Fqw/VJbE/E5Cy6QAI2VCkI+t80zEO1C7IaOwzvnOrnR+bQEAxwA== X-Received: by 10.99.226.3 with SMTP id q3mr693410pgh.37.1482255343831; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:35:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from WIN-49UB1CRFAIL (ec2-54-213-113-136.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com. [54.213.113.136]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 2sm40945864pgy.27.2016.12.20.09.35.42 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Dec 2016 09:35:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:17:40 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Diane Neal Subject: Best Business VoIP Solution for 2017 Message-ID: <00bff718d4626a31919219c77b972bf8@WIN-49UB1CRFAIL> X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.2.15 (https://github.com/PHPMailer/PHPMailer) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:35:45 -0000 We help business professionals choose the best software solutions.   2017 Business VoIP Buyer's Guide New Features and Capabilities DOWNLOAD NOW In 2017, more businesses will transition to a VoIP phone system. If you are among them—or if you’ll be upgrading an existing VoIP system—you need to learn about the latest technologies and market trends. This buyer’s guide will tell you what you need to know about: trends, hardware, and features. No matter what the size of your business, there is a VoIP solution out there that’s a good fit for your needs. Software Purchase Guide Inc, 501 Silverside Rd, STE 105, Wilmington, DE 19809, USA, contact@softwarepurchaseguide.com You are receiving this email because you have signed up as freebsd-questions@freebsd.org for white papers or comparision guides or have elected to receive information or offers from Software Purchase Guide Inc. If you do not wish to receive white papers or comparision guides or information or offers from Software Purchase Guide Inc. in future unsubscribe here From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 20 17:37:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA03EC89408 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:37:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from bucksport.safeport.com (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CA9A13C0 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:37:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from bucksport.safeport.com (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]) by bucksport.safeport.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uBKHUrsp028886; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:30:53 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:30:53 -0500 (EST) From: DTD To: Adam Vande More cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: anyone know what 'ping: sendto: Can't assign requested" means In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]); Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:30:53 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:37:20 -0000 On Tue, 20 Dec 2016, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:33 PM, DTD wrote: > For truth in advertising this is pinging from a jail. The problem is limited to pinging > outside of the jailed environment. I took a shot a the ping source to see if there was an > illuminating comment around the message but got lost in tacking this through libc source. > > I can show this is not a routing issue and the jails can ping. Our LAN has a > dozen or so devices all in the network 192.168.2.0/24. To demonstrate the > problem I used two hosts in the LAN and some external systems. The jail > environment is chaos (host) and two jails, gaia and gsscc. First, from either > jail all the above is ping-able: > > From gaia: > > gaia:~> ping -c 2 chaos > PING chaos.boltsys.com (192.168.2.117): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.117: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.020 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.117: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.047 ms > > --- chaos.boltsys.com ping statistics --- > 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.020/0.034/0.047/0.013 ms > gaia:~> ping -c 2 gsscc > PING gsscc.boltsys.com (192.168.2.111): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.111: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.022 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.2.111: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.023 ms > > artemis is a host on the 192.168.2.0/24: > > gaia:~> ping -c 2 artemis > PING artemis.boltsys.com (192.168.2.102): 56 data bytes > ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address > ping: sendto: Can't assign requested address > Neat, thanks Adam. gaia:~> ping -S 192.168.2.110 artemis PING artemis.boltsys.com (192.168.2.102) from 192.168.2.110: 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 192.168.2.102: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.974 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.2.102: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=1.082 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.2.102: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.742 ms 64 bytes from 192.168.2.102: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=1.256 ms ^C As 192.168.2.110 is the jail IP address: em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=4219b ether c8:9c:dc:eb:ab:fb inet 192.168.2.110 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.2.110 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active I guess it's a jail thingy in kernel. Seems like a bug to me but I could not even find where the error was coming from. Thank you again. I would (and did not) get -S from 'man ping' as solving the problem Doug _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-217-9220 Fax: 301-217-9277 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 20 19:07:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D004C87ABA for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 19:07:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@optinet.com) Received: from cobra.acceleratedweb.net (cobra-gw.acceleratedweb.net [207.99.79.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 57CF120E for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 19:07:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon@optinet.com) Received: (qmail 26102 invoked by uid 110); 20 Dec 2016 19:07:18 -0000 Received: from ool-43549c41.dyn.optonline.net (HELO desktop1) (simon@optinet.com@67.84.156.65) by cobra.acceleratedweb.net with SMTP; 20 Dec 2016 19:07:18 -0000 From: "Simon" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , "John Levine" Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:07:18 -0500 Priority: Normal X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.20.2717) For Windows 2000 (5.1.2600;3) In-Reply-To: <20161219160517.18271.qmail@ary.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: ssl certificate X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 19:07:25 -0000 On 19 Dec 2016 16:05:17 -0000, John Levine wrote: >>>Exactly like the root DNS servers. Do you have problems with those? >> >>No, not exactly. DNS root servers are paid for via domain fees (ICANN). >Misinformation like this is not helpful. >ICANN runs the L root. The other 12 are run by other organizations on >essentially a handshake basis, with no money changing hands. >>So when I find free domain registration service for my domains it will be >>just like LE, but until then... ya, I have a problem, I want it free! >You might enjoy .tk. Domains are free, $0. >In the meantime, sensible people are all getting their certs from >Let's Encrypt. >R's, >John Essentially? So when those organizations sell ISP related services, such as VeriSign running J server, that is not cost passed down to consumers, no? Or when ARMY runs one, the tax payers are not on the hook? of course not.. It's like *free* peering! No, it isn't free! both sides pay through their provided and paid-for consumer services. You probably think the country roads you drive on are free too because you don't receive a direct bill for them. Like I said, indirectly paid-for. .tk free, ya? well, ya, up to 12 months but for 1+ year there is a standard, not even subsidized fee! So ya, they want you to get the domain and then when you put it to use, of course you will continue to renew it at a fee! Who is spreading misinformation here. For testing purposes you can get some subdomain for free for limited time or even longer use in many places. When I asked about free domains, I was not asking up to 12 months. I meant free as in free, not some limited time BS free. Plus I want .com, .net not some sill .tk When you get free SSL does it say you are special next to it like .tk does? So again, still looking for free domains, servers, admins, and colocation. Maybe Amazon can hook me up with their cloud they make billions off of :D -Simon From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 20 23:30:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3968C898CB for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:30:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 349031822; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:30:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id u144so37353416wmu.1; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:30:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4B6E4WwNq511QP9WsCN3kGJR856PAjIEzDLM7iaObVc=; b=INV8alxVrxw3XXZcABIH+0RLiKVbJRQdn3WDDsGeHQfGblbRbnPL+AJmpZUBMnYxXB xZIMl4dU1ILyeCtkxHedr0RE6lcomklJpwn4urWZJKsKDiJnz18etsqH7HTsN73JAsXh 0I8us/zWElNjQ+LGt4Va4EMvRz6oCHACw9x0gbubfcK8eHklVovDKYbDlLGYz86E2Jct fyLRC3OldfosnHTEPljVSrDB06KPokm1DYvi6u1Fg/ELCIRr6Ca945NBidl8LW5wXCjn eJi1WAx/BKZM6PEnT+fgQvM3DttNsQqIKdjIu+sDgQZ6HOUMs0GFUe3bLhOFi0xpJRko 2hVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=4B6E4WwNq511QP9WsCN3kGJR856PAjIEzDLM7iaObVc=; b=LTsnSDfaSKe+9F7a35IxSeMgfpkV/rp8U1QZvEL0ZYzrsurq11ktijOdsKbY5w20z+ wuzOp/KA0gsu9me9eT49zkKbaoe0PNeP8wFkUXIV2vhJZAaqJNTF6/HE3KnToo5Jqvu9 0kMgeC4DQiBM2grHKzrNY78Wh4eoAql2BGvriR5oQaO3l5AuC9lPPOi/Iz0+SGbOvwJz WkPj4QUxe53+qZIMRu18WMzzudCVrw1eaGSjigap5PIrBBWqrqPIleXlB34FAy/eYqtA D6ss88mjMlpm8V/MENiI2gkN+gt4G9SChCgbkKbLxVyqFY/LOX3yXSp4IMTJ5Pkc1hP1 lWQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIDaVfUuuzySmQDmjjgCKnQ60TENKAcxIN6R+PWYS+47uVhGyuwN4XUtlcjDsRm6S3N7tP3WKHrByMpkw== X-Received: by 10.28.135.5 with SMTP id j5mr4186628wmd.3.1482276646863; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:30:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5ee1dcc7-643b-a7b1-7d1c-1017599bdfe5@citrin.ru> <5844BA83.8030601@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Ben Woods Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:30:36 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: blacklistd(8) - entries don't removed To: Anton Yuzhaninov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "lidl@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 23:30:49 -0000 On Wed., 21 Dec. 2016 at 12:16 am, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote: > It turned out, that blacklistd expects string OK from > blacklistd-helper script. > > echo 'OK' > in script is workaround working for me. > > Some time ago this was committed to head: > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/306695 > > This behavior of blacklistd is unexpected and undocumented in man though. > > It was ported from NetBSD and in NetBSD 7.0.2 blacklistd has the > same problem - script should print 'OK' string. > > I don't like this, but it seems to be not a bug, but a bad designed > feature. > Nice find. Please do raise a bug report to request the man page is updated to explain this feature. Be sure to CC Kurt Lidl (lidl@freebsd.org) in the bug report, as he committed the change and may know enough to ok the man page update. Regards, Ben From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Dec 21 01:29:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC582C88FBD for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 01:29:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1BDB1788 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 01:29:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A10CFC88FBC; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 01:29:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A58C88FBB for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 01:29:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mailrelay15.qsc.de (mailrelay15.qsc.de [212.99.187.254]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.antispameurope.com", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2784B1787 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 01:29:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de ([213.148.129.14]) by mailrelay15.qsc.de; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 02:28:55 +0100 Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-28-64.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.28.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C884E3CBF9; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 02:27:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id uBL1Rqql002157; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 02:27:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 02:27:52 +0100 From: Polytropon To: swjatoslaw gerus Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Comparsion of Solaris , FreeBSD ,Ubuntu Default profile ,bash profile ,bashrc,xinitrc,bash-logout .Xauthority Message-Id: <20161221022752.5bb9b9e6.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1482239868.3440312.824757033.31142D42@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1482200118.1106059.824327441.01A23424@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20161220040348.c8e60a69.freebsd@edvax.de> <1482239868.3440312.824757033.31142D42@webmail.messagingengine.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-cloud-security-sender: freebsd@edvax.de X-cloud-security-recipient: questions@freebsd.org X-cloud-security-Virusscan: CLEAN X-cloud-security-disclaimer: This E-Mail was scanned by E-Mailservice on mailrelay15.qsc.de with 0650E69D34C X-cloud-security-connect: mx01.qsc.de[213.148.129.14], TLS=1, IP=213.148.129.14 X-cloud-security: scantime:.3210 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 01:29:05 -0000 Re-including list and summarizing replies, hope that's okay. On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:17:48 +0100, swjatoslaw gerus wrote: > Dear Sir > > Thank you for you for message > > 1.To date can not perform simpliest task -start with two x11 > Attempt change user .profile -xterm -fg green +bg black & > not worked compiz going to 80 % CPU time (top) The X startup file is ~/.xinitrc or ~/.xsession. However, compiz isn't part of a basic X install and is found typically with "big" desktop environments such as KDE or Gnome. When I read "simpliest task", I do _not_ have Gnome in mind - it just sounds wrong. ;-) > 2. Regulary received Zeitgeist > -------------------------------------------- > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zeitgeist_(free_software) > > will avoid ... > #################### As far as I see, "Zeitgeist" is part of Gnome. Check this forum entry on that problematic topic: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/43569/ As it seems, you get "Zeitgeist" with Gnome, and it's not possible to remove it without breaking Gnome. But I have not tried this, so maybe there is an option to disable "Zeitgeist" when you build from source... Maybe you can check the "Gnome 2 successors" MATE and Cinnamon for _not_ to include that "Zeitgeist" component? > Did FreeBSD have this kind of forced additional software ? No. The operating system is quite "limited" (but fully functional!) in what it installs. After the OS is in place, you can install whatever software you want from a repository of several thousand ported application. Nothing is _forced_ upon you. Check the relevant section in The FreeBSD Handbook: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports.html On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 18:19:00 +0100, swjatoslaw gerus wrote: > re: Those entries look like they belong into an X startup file, > ~/xinitrc (when you're using "startx") or ~/.xsession (when > you're using a display manager such as XDM). > > After display with unity closed (5 minuts computer not used) > on display present Unity? Isn't that a component of Gnome, too? In case you're using Gnome, don't bother using ~/.xinitrc or ~/.xsession. It doesn't work. I've already fought this war and lost. ;-) In order to configure Gnome, you _need_ to use the tools provided by Gnome. There is an "Autostart"-like group or setting where you can add applications that should be started when the user session is launched. That will work. > some kind of tty , but with onboard display with black backround,which > asked for user password Text mode or GUI? It could be GDM, the Gnome display manager. Oh, as we've been talking about Gnome a lot, make sure you read the Gnome project's information: https://www.freebsd.org/gnome/ For more general X configuration (independently of Gnome), like using a display manager or selecting a window manager or desktop environment: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/x-xdm.html https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/x11-wm.html That should cover most typical user situations. > That is what essentialy author will have > no any desktop environment which interfere programm > In this condition author will start 2-3 xterm Then you should say goodbye to Gnome. It's so much trouble to turn Gnome into something which it isn't - a lightweight window manager. Instead, install a lightweight window manager (and display manager if you like), for example WindowMaker. :-) You could also try "Mate" or "Cinnamon", Gnome 2 successors, also not that bad. > 1. passwd -entried > 2. to date started unity with multiple icons , graphics & > > Demand -started equal some kind of tty with onboard display and with > commando line > > from commando line start 2-3 xterm & ( author can make simpeeeee > script sh x.sh) There are alternatives to Gnome. I'd like to recommend KDE which has improved a lot over the last years. But Xfce or Lxde are probably also worth checking. I'm not sure about how FreeBSD's native desktop environment, Lumina, is coming along. https://lumina-desktop.org/get-lumina/ https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/58140/ If you do not need a full desktop environment, there are plenty of excellent window managers. Personally, I'm using WindowMaker for decades now, and I'm very happy with it. There's also fvwm2 which is simple and useful. In worst case, use twm. :-) On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:55:24 +0100, swjatoslaw gerus wrote: > Dear Sir > > If author understand definitions of freebsd correctly > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/x-understanding.html Use https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/x11.html as a better entry point for the X topic. The TOC will have a nice summary of the _steps_ you'll have to take to configure and run X. > For author demand > > than KDE/Gnome DE must be not installed > ############################## > only composite window manager > ############################# > > browsers and programms would start without any icons from commando line That is also possible. For example, you could use Compiz Fusion instead of a more simple window manager. https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/x-compiz-fusion.html However, I have never used this software so I cannot be more specific. I'm not sure in how far it requires Gnome to work, or if it requires a window manager to be present (even if it's just fvwm2). > freebsd default -? FreeBSD doesn't default to any window manager (or X at all). It's up to the user to decide, simply because FreeBSD is a multi-purpose operating system for desktops, servers, and appliances, so you cannot just slap an arbitrary desktop environment into the OS and tell users to "take it or leave it". :-) So if _I_ wanted just a screen with a few terminals, I'd just use something like fvwm2 to begin with. It's so simple and just works. It obeys ~/.xinitrc (which Gnome doesn't) and plays nice with display managers such as xdm (which Gnome also doesn't). And if I'd decide to test another window manager, it's just a simple change of ~/.xinitrc's "exec" statement. Here is an example for a ~/.xinitrc file for use with twm: #!/bin/sh [ -f ~/.xmodmaprc ] && xmodmap ~/.xmodmaprc xsetroot -cursor_name left_ptr xset r rate 250 30 xset b 100 1000 15 xset s off xset -dpms xterm -title "Terminal" -geometry 80x25+100+100 -fg black -bg beige & xterm -title "Terminal" -geometry 80x25+150+150 -fg green -bg black & exec twm If you want to use this file in combination with XDM, you don't need to have duplicate content of ~/.xinitrc and ~/.xsession (because xdm will igonore ~/.xinitrc, and execute ~/.xsession instead). Use this "cascade" in ~/.xsession instead: #!/bin/csh source ~/.cshrc exec ~/.xinitrc It will incorporate your user's shell configuration (here: C shell) and then continue as ~/.xinitrc. So now you can use both xdm and classic "startx". :-) > solaris and freebsd default shell - Korn Shell. > ubuntu defaault shell -bash FreeBSD default dialog shell: C shell (tcsh) FreeBSD default scripting shell: Bourne shell (sh), which technically is an Almquist shell (ash), but quite compatible even with bash -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Dec 21 01:41:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD058C8961F for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 01:41:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-f47.google.com (mail-it0-f47.google.com [209.85.214.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B22ED1289 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 01:41:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brandon.wandersee@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-f47.google.com with SMTP id 75so70207191ite.1 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:41:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=KQvqOV3Ju9D0jPfv7ji/4O6YIKZoBj1AbYcaRCluMx8=; b=mTV7kljv2lW6pbP8vM5gZTtRLJN2CbDO96ZRvsgPJ/hPFK+jmu9jZklZjBuryGsEC6 0DAz4FsGbsItDlnP11Hvsio7Il1j9I8nyRK5yfmgTB+u5IlPCgCHYTD/tB3YEuEOYlVy WyNzZfsi1eqjGi1ChemQ+NMfmGIoUb0piq6iSY3GA7EPfi4QjwAkLhI+J7s2sBm9ey3z vyHMI4naB/BmRM6oKTvMNu11znNZ4j8hIiaGzlbOzJcSAoCEJQa1D6qgMDllDx75+gFK m/+tXXnvyGRvAzZr6ctxFKAX1MaOPVQJv60pItQfSrZerwA5uh1s9PfYMAGt37cFKcwE MptA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKIMzB/n3BwkHcxB3Sar7o4fA5honjtCDfl1pp4sh+iCBhxt09GPLU2iiLZ9DZimQ== X-Received: by 10.36.123.82 with SMTP id q79mr5564610itc.25.1482284496498; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:41:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from WorkBox.homestead.org (65-128-151-1.mpls.qwest.net. [65.128.151.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j143sm7147450ita.1.2016.12.20.17.41.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Dec 2016 17:41:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (WorkBox.homestead.org [local]) by WorkBox.homestead.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id ce37dfef; Tue, 20 Dec 2016 19:41:33 -0600 (CST) References: <867f6u22vv.fsf@gmail.com> User-agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 25.1.1 From: Brandon J. Wandersee To: Malcolm Matalka Cc: Aleksandr Miroslav , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs (zxfer) replication -- "holes" in backups? In-reply-to: <867f6u22vv.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 19:41:33 -0600 Message-ID: <86bmw6m52q.fsf@WorkBox.homestead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 01:41:44 -0000 Malcolm Matalka writes: > Aleksandr Miroslav writes: >> It turns out that when I sent my snapshots to my backup machine, I never >> turned off this property, the backup machine also had zfstools installed, >> and so was taking snapshots of my backupsnaphots. Hence the holes. I've >> since cleaned this up, and will let backups run for a few days and see if >> this fixes the problem. > > I ran into this problem where the snapshots the machine that was backing > up to named the snapshots the same thing so zxfer thought the transfer > didn't need to happen. I "solved" this by putting the hostname in the > snapshot name. There is probably a better way though. I'm not sure there's an entirely elegant way to deal with it. I use zfstools and zxfer myself, and have just accepted having a really long line in the crontab to remove the properties before transfer. I used to use sysutils/zfsnap, which is a pretty good tool in its own right and can avoid the problem of the system holding backups creating new snapshots on the backups. However, it does that by requiring multi-entries for each type of backup iteration, as well as lines for every single dataset, added to /etc/periodic.conf. Works well enough for simple setups, but more complex ones get out of hand. -- :: Brandon J. Wandersee :: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com :: -------------------------------------------------- :: 'The best design is as little design as possible.' :: --- Dieter Rams ---------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Dec 21 14:02:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C63B3C8AFF4 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:02:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from COL004-OMC4S12.hotmail.com (col004-omc4s12.hotmail.com [65.55.34.214]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 908D910F for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:02:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from EUR02-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.34.199]) by COL004-OMC4S12.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Wed, 21 Dec 2016 06:01:05 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=d+RSnnZVFczZd0wlgP2R7OMJv/l+9QHqxO9OyaF1mcU=; b=ubgcTpNZWMRv2uABx6j89yNb0mKzol6Pa3EwRAVQcJCtXbGprTYHIMzktS2ktyDLehKAsqogUTZ0aMpyzLdlEpyqSlIzqLljO9DV3dIIQQTWIt7osKcFOhhIxkvf3Qce7n5lkOsnf2myWvdalGC54nM5SAH8Vm1ZscRSRQ4fZDOWHp0b50Bs+TXlIf8BYI/37gPElcZTL11CwR0vqjKhO1TfkabnKaWd2OjsjSuLYCQy+33iSbrjKDFRBwyV1l6WmNuxLK58/UwfJLohyBQRu1x8OslH9f0tKn7ybXmPDhzHgnqwqn/1BYNWznwFb2nzjJywTvAQ4e5eSXLpXO6xxw== Received: from HE1EUR02FT019.eop-EUR02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.10.58) by HE1EUR02HT093.eop-EUR02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.11.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.761.6; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:01:00 +0000 Received: from VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.152.10.59) by HE1EUR02FT019.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.10.70) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.789.10 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:01:00 +0000 Received: from VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.162.28]) by VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.162.28]) with mapi id 15.01.0789.018; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:01:00 +0000 From: Manish Jain To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Where can I get help for debugging system crash ? Thread-Topic: Where can I get help for debugging system crash ? Thread-Index: AQHSW5Koh1MzOI7ba02P/iuCM+bZyw== Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:00:59 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: freebsd.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;freebsd.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=hotmail.com; x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:536C750DE5B525052835637281B7017F25CF33E467C59EC07E145728FCF64898; UpperCasedChecksum:D6A39CEB23D9A10E50459BD980829F10E9C3CE57109C83E11D913F464D7C859A; SizeAsReceived:7129; Count:34 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-incomingheadercount: 34 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; HE1EUR02HT093; 7:ROE0pgV3ujOez4un46cQxT9wVvmOiN9ADLGJK1RazDWft8MRNIDVRDgKIz1QccPsoIe4urZH4y75IA/WdPD6pwhHu1IKy5b7WTuG0cogQh+dfGtzEw4FEgFYYFynHfVrlSFM/Pf2T9S4nccx5YPqQJF03FSHvIm+fIjOExUi8w3YtQPenb/QWDIoG7FyL9X7n8IVL3qxlSSTrRYTFNTaLJeEhHvdp7NPcTK/JReLwB++dRC9lXVEb9zi2PgScDl70+K1+73I/rZe5jhU2UpumiWrilA+Csncd5gAQxY/g1AN8zK6XYb9uyIb/DECKlk4iclTrpZMSXXKVBxbEs43KNSBogHkecwHNxkfChDJeu6lTxKlbTS5Z6/duD0QJa9Pp7tJek/SyBxDKZFGiuqGzdQiyFxXWActKIyrXMrPyeXRb0ql5CaX8QWBluFgrCMzBKz7HjQejUoby3TWaWuu9g== x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:HE1EUR02HT093; H:VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 7ead3933-43ec-42e5-4c0b-08d429a9ca3b x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(1601124038)(1603103113)(1601125047); SRVR:HE1EUR02HT093; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:HE1EUR02HT093; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:HE1EUR02HT093; x-forefront-prvs: 01630974C0 spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: <033FB4BF7C664B4F87FC1FA8C0FEA18A@eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Dec 2016 14:00:59.8899 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HE1EUR02HT093 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Dec 2016 14:01:05.0511 (UTC) FILETIME=[ABEF5F70:01D25B92] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:02:11 -0000 DQpIaSwNCg0KSSBhbSBydW5uaW5nIGEgRnJlZUJTRCAxMSBhbWQ2NCBib3guIFRoZSBib3ggZ2Vu ZXJhbGx5IHdvcmtzIHdlbGwsIGJ1dCANCm9uY2UgZXZlcnkgd2hpbGUgKGFib3V0IG9uY2UgYSBt b250aCksIHRoZSBzeXN0ZW0gcHJvZHVjZXMgYSBjcmFzaCwgd2l0aCANCmEgbGFyZ2UgY29yZSBm aWxlIGF0IC92YXIvY3Jhc2guIEkgaGFkIGEgY3Jhc2ggeWVzdGVyZGF5LiBUaGUgaW5mby4wIGZv ciANCnRoZSB0aGUgbGFzdCBjb3JlIHJlYWRzIGFzIDoNCg0KRHVtcCBoZWFkZXIgZnJvbSBkZXZp Y2U6IC9kZXYvYWRhMHAzDQogICBBcmNoaXRlY3R1cmU6IGFtZDY0DQogICBBcmNoaXRlY3R1cmUg VmVyc2lvbjogMg0KICAgRHVtcCBMZW5ndGg6IDEwMTI4MzQzMDQNCiAgIEJsb2Nrc2l6ZTogNTEy DQogICBEdW1wdGltZTogVHVlIERlYyAyMCAxOTowNToyOCAyMDE2DQogICBIb3N0bmFtZTogYm91 cm5lLjFkZW50MXR5DQogICBNYWdpYzogRnJlZUJTRCBLZXJuZWwgRHVtcA0KICAgVmVyc2lvbiBT dHJpbmc6IEZyZWVCU0QgMTEuMC1SRUxFQVNFLXAxICMwIHIzMDY0MjA6IFRodSBTZXAgMjkgDQow MTo0MzoyMyBVVEMgMjAxNg0KICAgICByb290QHJlbGVuZzIubnlpLmZyZWVic2Qub3JnOi91c3Iv b2JqL3Vzci9zcmMvc3lzL0dFTkVSSUMNCiAgIFBhbmljIFN0cmluZzogcGFnZSBmYXVsdA0KICAg RHVtcCBQYXJpdHk6IDQwMjU1NjA0MjYNCiAgIEJvdW5kczogMA0KICAgRHVtcCBTdGF0dXM6IGdv b2QNCg0KL2Rldi9hZGEwcDMgY29ycmVzcG9uZHMgdG8gbXkgc3dhcCBwYXJ0aXRpb24uIE15IGJv eCBoYXMgMiBzb2xpZCBzdGF0ZSANCmRpc2tzLCB3aGljaCBwcm92aWRlIGFkYTBwMSAoZWZpKSwg YWRhMHAyICh1ZnMpLCBhZGEwcDMgKHN3YXApLCBhZGEwcDQgDQoodWZzKSBhbmQgYWRhMXMxICh1 ZnMpLg0KDQpJIG5lZWQgaGVscCB0byBkZXRlcm1pbmUgZXhhY3RseSB3aGF0IGlzIHByb2R1Y2lu ZyB0aGUgY3Jhc2ggLSBJcyBpdCANCnNvbWUgaGFyZHdhcmUgcHJvYmxlbSBvciBzb21lIGlzc3Vl IHdpdGggdGhlIEZyZWVCU0QgY29kZSA/IElmIGFueW9uZSANCmNhbiBoZWxwIG1lIGdldCB0aHJv dWdoIHRvIHRoZSByaWdodCBjaGFubmVsLCBJIHdpbGwgYmUgZ3JhdGVmdWwgaW5kZWVkLg0KDQpS ZWdhcmRzDQpNYW5pc2ggSmFpbg0K From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Dec 21 14:26:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00D24C8A60B for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:26:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0CDE4A for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:26:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D6A60C8A60A; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:26:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49E8C8A609 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:26:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mailrelay11.qsc.de (mailrelay11.qsc.de [212.99.187.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.antispameurope.com", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A18AE49 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:26:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de ([213.148.129.14]) by mailrelay11.qsc.de; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:28:17 +0100 Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-28-64.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.28.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 886883CC71; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:25:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id uBLEPiCu002004; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:25:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 15:25:44 +0100 From: Polytropon To: swjatoslaw gerus Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where is readme -downloading via FTP (aktiv,passiv,proxy ) for last version freebsd Message-Id: <20161221152544.6830e7ec.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1482323632.28622.825856145.13A98A71@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1482200118.1106059.824327441.01A23424@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20161220040348.c8e60a69.freebsd@edvax.de> <1482239868.3440312.824757033.31142D42@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20161221022752.5bb9b9e6.freebsd@edvax.de> <1482323632.28622.825856145.13A98A71@webmail.messagingengine.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-cloud-security-sender: freebsd@edvax.de X-cloud-security-recipient: questions@freebsd.org X-cloud-security-Virusscan: CLEAN X-cloud-security-disclaimer: This E-Mail was scanned by E-Mailservice on mailrelay11.qsc.de with 7CFA66A356B X-cloud-security-connect: mx01.qsc.de[213.148.129.14], TLS=1, IP=213.148.129.14 X-cloud-security: scantime:.3220 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:26:35 -0000 On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 13:33:52 +0100, swjatoslaw gerus wrote: > Where is readme -downloading via FTP (aktiv,passiv,proxy ) for last > version freebsd You should find all needed information here: https://www.freebsd.org/where.html If you already have FreeBSD installed, the local manual "man ftp" contains the relevant information regarding active/passive as well as how to set a proxy for FTP downloads. You can also refer to the online manpage: https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ftp&apropos=0&sektion=1&manpath=FreeBSD+11.0-RELEASE&arch=default&format=html The location for manual downloads is: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/ISO-IMAGES/11.0/ Here you can find the 32 bit and 64 bit versions for burning to optical media or for use with USB sticks (both full and minimal). > Author work via wlan 2.4 and 5.3 ghz > > watch -n1 iwconfig .... signal level from -54 dbm untill -84 dbm The FreeBSD Handbook has this information: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-wireless.html Also check this excellent article by Warren Block: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/wireless.html -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Dec 21 17:50:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFEB2C8ABE1 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:50:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 861C41BA3 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:50:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:1c1d:86a1:a200:b700]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D7E9AE53 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/4D7E9AE53; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Where can I get help for debugging system crash ? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <141a0360-2da5-4769-cadd-48c504edc996@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:49:54 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r3c0XEArsV6rfcJbPvPxWskE8cQ5G1EwH" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:50:13 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --r3c0XEArsV6rfcJbPvPxWskE8cQ5G1EwH Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="XADQ01T3AEio9ioHNPk6asdSgwJhqSe5O"; protected-headers="v1" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <141a0360-2da5-4769-cadd-48c504edc996@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Where can I get help for debugging system crash ? References: In-Reply-To: --XADQ01T3AEio9ioHNPk6asdSgwJhqSe5O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21/12/2016 14:00, Manish Jain wrote: > I am running a FreeBSD 11 amd64 box. The box generally works well, but = > once every while (about once a month), the system produces a crash, wit= h=20 > a large core file at /var/crash. I had a crash yesterday. The info.0 fo= r=20 > the the last core reads as : >=20 > Dump header from device: /dev/ada0p3 > Architecture: amd64 > Architecture Version: 2 > Dump Length: 1012834304 > Blocksize: 512 > Dumptime: Tue Dec 20 19:05:28 2016 > Hostname: bourne.1dent1ty > Magic: FreeBSD Kernel Dump > Version String: FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p1 #0 r306420: Thu Sep 29=20 > 01:43:23 UTC 2016 > root@releng2.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC > Panic String: page fault > Dump Parity: 4025560426 > Bounds: 0 > Dump Status: good >=20 > /dev/ada0p3 corresponds to my swap partition. My box has 2 solid state = > disks, which provide ada0p1 (efi), ada0p2 (ufs), ada0p3 (swap), ada0p4 = > (ufs) and ada1s1 (ufs). >=20 > I need help to determine exactly what is producing the crash - Is it=20 > some hardware problem or some issue with the FreeBSD code ? If anyone=20 > can help me get through to the right channel, I will be grateful indeed= =2E Hi, Manish, The best thing to do here is to open a PR with what details of the crash you can extract from the core dump. You have a full system core, so you should be able to follow the instructions here, and extract a backtrace from the kernel: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/ker= neldebug-gdb.html Or generating a textdump will automatically process your saved core and produce a textual report with lots of debugging information. This does require a modified kernel configuration though. See textdump(4) and http://www.etinc.com/122/Using-FreeBSD-Text-Dumps for details. If you can pin the problem down to a particular subsystem or device, then that should indicate which mailing list would be a good choice to discuss the problem. If it doesn't appear to be in any device or sub-system specific part of the kernel, then try asking on freebsd-stable@... Cheers, Matthew --XADQ01T3AEio9ioHNPk6asdSgwJhqSe5O-- --r3c0XEArsV6rfcJbPvPxWskE8cQ5G1EwH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYWsDJXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATUDAP/1NxuWEfrsEPE5vpYuwLe5+W v+TnlbqTbEecBSNKBGpzyne+sRg7XFAVacg9pp76/s1vxg47uuJimRY6KfWgZRkm pOuWRI8m/PdgA0xkj2m3Jz+FjR2ypjyHK+RhC2HcyoNGwPn1kdDEDx6k0umEH4S9 2T/AmgxGO43IxT5fZWopwxeojC/Z48VM/rsYKAcaxzszHdCeZWEOGnIKmUOhnDvk ysFRSsG2ueHwF7pfQIrqCSOC7nIbthR11cNzE8YODX8mOa9cnAKekRvNgWjuZyNV 1xZA3OK6lITbTjBpPMlrZ2kHLDto5gBvgmnrt4mgVzQ9HFfsjlb5QP/e+fgiEWLt +QyKRivFwwqGOQcl0rChsrznD7w4FWGRPHXFuhRQlyE3HGV0V/lK3zTssiJOsFGH FEHDxy75dxttqEmgWmWHtWqEiqM+ef9YzUPCJ86Sz5S3ILutHt6JuqzzM7nRkPc/ WQZ3yK/j8EvHVr8k4PeqIiBNYwmDo4g7nTemBVBCdxggSPdlLnc5J8eV+1/xXWxK FBfY9gKOxVVMCxO+I3r1H5ZLRT0578fsCGNSTkNlNUusQiEHNDfxPuVp5hHMN8Kg NVnHtHsQFJFLVazSAmrjQUomRgAjgs4Jk5qneX/tn/g/qQTctOEEnVV4JpkmZVZw wmdWaGbZMx0K8EpB8GE6 =NGiL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r3c0XEArsV6rfcJbPvPxWskE8cQ5G1EwH-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Dec 21 18:12:07 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49576C8A66A for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:12:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from cosmo.uchicago.edu (cosmo.uchicago.edu [128.135.20.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 087F21AC4 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:12:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: by cosmo.uchicago.edu (Postfix, from userid 48) id 51707CB8C9D; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:13:08 -0600 (CST) Received: from 128.135.52.6 (SquirrelMail authenticated user valeri) by cosmo.uchicago.edu with HTTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:13:08 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <23776.128.135.52.6.1482343988.squirrel@cosmo.uchicago.edu> In-Reply-To: <141a0360-2da5-4769-cadd-48c504edc996@FreeBSD.org> References: <141a0360-2da5-4769-cadd-48c504edc996@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 12:13:08 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Where can I get help for debugging system crash ? From: "Valeri Galtsev" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.8-5.el5.centos.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:12:07 -0000 On Wed, December 21, 2016 11:49 am, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 21/12/2016 14:00, Manish Jain wrote: >> I am running a FreeBSD 11 amd64 box. The box generally works well, but >> once every while (about once a month), the system produces a crash, with >> a large core file at /var/crash. I had a crash yesterday. The info.0 for >> the the last core reads as : >> >> Dump header from device: /dev/ada0p3 >> Architecture: amd64 >> Architecture Version: 2 >> Dump Length: 1012834304 >> Blocksize: 512 >> Dumptime: Tue Dec 20 19:05:28 2016 >> Hostname: bourne.1dent1ty >> Magic: FreeBSD Kernel Dump >> Version String: FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p1 #0 r306420: Thu Sep 29 >> 01:43:23 UTC 2016 >> root@releng2.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC >> Panic String: page fault >> Dump Parity: 4025560426 >> Bounds: 0 >> Dump Status: good >> >> /dev/ada0p3 corresponds to my swap partition. My box has 2 solid state >> disks, which provide ada0p1 (efi), ada0p2 (ufs), ada0p3 (swap), ada0p4 >> (ufs) and ada1s1 (ufs). >> >> I need help to determine exactly what is producing the crash - Is it >> some hardware problem or some issue with the FreeBSD code ? If anyone >> can help me get through to the right channel, I will be grateful indeed. > > Hi, Manish, > > The best thing to do here is to open a PR with what details of the crash > you can extract from the core dump. You have a full system core, so you > should be able to follow the instructions here, and extract a backtrace > from the kernel: > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-gdb.html > > Or generating a textdump will automatically process your saved core and > produce a textual report with lots of debugging information. This does > require a modified kernel configuration though. See > textdump(4) and http://www.etinc.com/122/Using-FreeBSD-Text-Dumps for > details. > > If you can pin the problem down to a particular subsystem or device, > then that should indicate which mailing list would be a good choice to > discuss the problem. If it doesn't appear to be in any device or > sub-system specific part of the kernel, then try asking on > freebsd-stable@... Thanks Matthew, this is very instructive. Manish, before opening PR though I would first make sure there is nothing fishy with _your_ hardware. Just go over same old routine first: re-seat all cards. Check all fans are spinning (especially CPU ones). Re-seat all memory modules (and CPUs). Check that all memory is from the same batch. I've seen memory with the same specs, but mixed different brands causing crash (very rarely, once a year for each given machine, but that was 32 node cluster, so one of machines of cluster crashed during given Month almost certainly). Try to run with single CPU (system always boot off CPU in the socket number 0 ), minimum memory, without any additional cards in expansions slots (unless you can pinpoint particular card via panic inside particular driver). The worst one can have is if system board (motherboard is jargon for over couple of decades) has micro crack. If you have another hardware with the same model of system board, try to move everything into that box and see if that box crashed as well under that system. Good luck! Valeri > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Dec 21 18:57:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BAF1C8B0D3 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:57:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexmiroslav@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua0-x22b.google.com (mail-ua0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03FAE1D44 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:57:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexmiroslav@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ua0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 88so58901078uaq.3 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:57:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=inuKzYC8Yx1dNqWnaObkmTCrmzRj8uY7MhyJjnH0cPQ=; b=ryDTwqO3YAHv1H0551hWOZZ5uXCKJNeEpjQRqgtnDGQiJQ+CC+1anNCzo7ACcbVwIh Gj4gx0Jv1Hh2BZ8/sSFtskE02JAL+4JxVWsfkXiX6OYfmtOB8dS8i/0Ub5C4k5Jeq4+5 jKKdgYQy9e1O8LD0cNDBIdvU8sFPgnOUOr10bowaWwGTU78UcBm+HDVcFN2G+AmlRISs o0ecyoJUal6Cq5MIH0RlVyacAH1lCiaYoiww+Dlf9KpNrIHwa+Obk29RHP+rjWd9l3PR 02pzHCIyFfvZfD9X/lO0PgrVH1BmbGXZ+ntRuVwNYKuU4Qm4/nSnNNNKgLPxbl2C+oMe xigA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=inuKzYC8Yx1dNqWnaObkmTCrmzRj8uY7MhyJjnH0cPQ=; b=OgttJyj7reok6Q6i3acca+jHbpoZLTSXk5eub2h8IdYVOnZaW95QUbCJahvHWTTHz1 Tw7G65CAwO5omO6Yh0JgzI4kjeU4Ubz3l3MxbkBMn34qklvqK/sb0GZqfQJjYiHlQma/ UF62rbxYz1gzAgS+LGjOIOxO5wKsm5YGhf/Rn58c4lkPKQJS7vZNpoVIp6HPgDoACy/d C6K65BKw7Qc2+UpSmeFO6Hw0gknz2kA0TEHbH+0JReyNtEkmi5kHupBu+B669X+7LDEh 8ODUcX9FURjqZl9IWZrqkiZ/DazE+14wgbsuRcYK9Txa7YIz8y7CXEO/ursd9/scv4NQ hHsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXID+bIm1/H5H3f51ZcAx7q/K66orD+pkspu/UgdfPt7CAFeYUF/X2d8Q9Mbpl6lK5zO4wE3Y6/reAKbEA== X-Received: by 10.176.7.71 with SMTP id h65mr277589uah.114.1482346636843; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:57:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.39.130 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:57:16 -0800 (PST) From: Aleksandr Miroslav Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:57:16 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: zfs (zxfer) replication -- "holes" in backups? (SOLVED) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:57:18 -0000 On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 8:13 PM, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote: > It turns out that when I sent my snapshots to my backup machine, I never turned off > this property, the backup machine also had zfstools installed, and so was taking > snapshots of my backupsnaphots. Indeed, this was the problem. The solution was to add the following to my zxfer command line: -o com.sun:auto-snapshot=false This turned off the property that zfstools uses to determine whether or not it should snapshot a filesystem. Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Dec 21 19:02:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9455BC8B2BA for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:02:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexmiroslav@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x230.google.com (mail-vk0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F52710CC for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:02:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexmiroslav@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x230.google.com with SMTP id 137so154435725vkl.0 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:02:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HBppi4uvGypKNNK61f1LCwKIp2pclkTU+OMbyR5rRLY=; b=nv4/yKImZkxs1Bl4K7lA0TGG4DM2j5jMJgfwDkMys/4s/WzZ0QWt14EXl5QWazUUl8 QU6eWgRP6SuhWpKo3M/H+xnfhDWiDe2a3hR/0laguRLsoNlMRydYqEw4EAyn1YoJ3+gb 3kE9INt3NtyfR7Fk3Edj35jFe3XJPFZf7oICvJ90eIXQp8nZaM+FiTV3wriCpd5OXyq9 JU9r743UWJ9uoyjJaaXzCVWva07T1/fa/97j+HHsPBLUinXgNZHhB0NQ4DgFhxJhHcof WewIHKU7OKZ/h1IQmLjOqqdCIR9EEo2RlGSZDmtN9ZFGjzN4ClpGmjtdIgqBgHpWcVhv 09qQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HBppi4uvGypKNNK61f1LCwKIp2pclkTU+OMbyR5rRLY=; b=frSPCRdGjgEInUsZTlYTVb58LSVCjb6zJZaqadJi9B2wV5XLXbzIM95AA9ycSdRRdx OyNHQ8iozfp2KB4eLhEV7HnyRUwlv/50O301UHFh7BLbh5/1JgsKxUuiCqKsBEWisZbf G193PiB/jtQzL66t3hYsq25TomJcBhMDwLgRHJ/B5/aabGY3YAs6ATtoJ/NQz/8Uf3QB fAX2vbnHuFnUsOGzdoN2cYPKVNHqnKocL0tTplXceie3pv5S24wX9Fj6IMSp3SFBcsun e0mfjrqLPAen2ckYl8gv1D9E9AvI/tpQMLnf0Vd+YoIV8Of+mRSd+HvNmoFXVYm26rez AYgw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKRNmPg2Qs232DLyDDAreP3BFWj0C4Zl9nR07dYfuknyRNAWSYn4OMecCa/9TJ6Af86WQ+0ZZpjQM02+A== X-Received: by 10.31.52.5 with SMTP id b5mr2542145vka.65.1482346962452; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:02:42 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.159.39.130 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:02:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <867f6u22vv.fsf@gmail.com> References: <867f6u22vv.fsf@gmail.com> From: Aleksandr Miroslav Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:02:42 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: zfs (zxfer) replication -- "holes" in backups? To: Malcolm Matalka Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:02:43 -0000 On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 4:36 AM, Malcolm Matalka wrote: > I ran into this problem where the snapshots the machine that was backing > up to named the snapshots the same thing so zxfer thought the transfer > didn't need to happen. I "solved" this by putting the hostname in the > snapshot name. zfstools determines whether or not to snap a filesystem by looking at a property. In my particular case, I didn't reset this property before zfs sending the snap to another machine running zfstools. Now that it is working properly, I'm happy with the setup. Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Dec 21 21:28:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5392C8B96E for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:28:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from faturamento@ilhadejaguarium.online) Received: from rdns7.ilhadejaguarium.online (rdns7.ilhadejaguarium.online [78.157.194.169]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9948919B7 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:28:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from faturamento@ilhadejaguarium.online) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=default; d=ilhadejaguarium.online; h=From:Subject:To:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id; i=abuse@ilhadejaguarium.online; bh=MSneFpQDkrb2d9fV2aTt5CS8EhY=; b=u4BEasW94aCj4mjwZH27SleMdRBAhzD/5F4bzEARpAYjM8JMtvxOKZ/Vy2J1zfvxtyQYrR429lCi oYTFi0diQGFoRdHpPBNZF7NVKvxglvTUKaBtkuMsxOJgqJ8ma/OkZCAfzLXsHdylb8fth6QCdRmt RB0yUGusEjtGx0JBhHY= From: "Setor Financeiro" Subject: Comprovante Bancario. To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:18:28 -0200 Message-Id: <20161221191827BC0B7BEF74$107148F2C1@WINPC> Status: N MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 21:28:37 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Dec 22 01:27:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B96CC8BB2E for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 01:27:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@tela.com) Received: from spider3.tela.com (smtp3.tela.com [208.90.22.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3A67E08 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 01:27:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@tela.com) Received: by spider3.tela.com (Postfix, from userid 103) id 8BAFA34AB23; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:23:10 -0600 (CST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 spider3.tela.com 8BAFA34AB23 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=tela.com; s=comtela1601; t=1482369790; bh=6ke6+QRLfJe6VVvXLRRiefsHLv1y2y3U4ba4CGNffVs=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; z=Date:=20Wed,=2021=20Dec=202016=2019:23:10=20-0600|From:=20Mike=20 Selner=20|To:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subje ct:=20ZFS=20crash=20on=20mountroot=20after=20removal=20of=20slog=2 0device; b=k/SM5C3JGJc80bOkY5LmekDKls2KK74wQ9UPLKhL2Qyi3uBwtATXRVnUUvYWzByv6 HocP83iI+3Krv2H7G5ojAf9J5iVQv+ftjy/Ojq6ee2xNLxpXYiPDxPsJp8D2r9r9d4 4REAalG5iHIEH1yGZ2n8eY/kPh5Q1oKlb8Uz7ALc= Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:23:10 -0600 From: Mike Selner To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ZFS crash on mountroot after removal of slog device Message-ID: <20161222012310.GA59045@spider3.tela.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 01:27:45 -0000 Hello, I have a FreeBSD 10.3 system with all filesystems on ZFS (except some tmp on SSD). I have L2ARC and SLOG on SSD. The SSD started reporting SMART errors so I removed the L2ARC device which worked fine. Then I removed the SLOG device using: zpool remove zroot gpt/ssdslog0 The system returned to the # prompt but a few minutes later the system panicked and and rebooted. After reboot it fails to mount root fs, giving the message: Trying to mount root from zfs:zroot/ROOT/default [ ]... panic: solaris assert: nvlist_lookup_uint64(configs[ i], ZPOOL_CONFIG_POOL_TXG, &txg) == 0, file: /usr/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/spa.c, line: 4039 cpuid = 4 Short version: I can import the pool using fixit on an install memstick, but can not get the system to mountroot when booting from this pool. Full details at https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/59006/. Please advise if I should also post full details here. Thank you -- Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Dec 22 03:13:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C591CC8BEB7 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 03:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A92E014D9 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 03:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A88B8C8BEB6; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 03:13:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82B2C8BEB5 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 03:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mailrelay10.qsc.de (mailrelay10.qsc.de [212.99.163.152]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.antispameurope.com", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2515614D6 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 03:13:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de ([213.148.129.14]) by mailrelay10.qsc.de; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 04:13:16 +0100 Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-28-64.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.28.64]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E0343CBF9; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 04:13:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id uBM3D1LL002192; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 04:13:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 04:13:01 +0100 From: Polytropon To: swjatoslaw gerus Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thank you for suggest& -Re: Where is readme -downloading via FTP (aktiv,passiv,proxy ) for last version freebsd Message-Id: <20161222041301.3a6446e5.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1482337312.81882.826068289.35F915A2@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1482200118.1106059.824327441.01A23424@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20161220040348.c8e60a69.freebsd@edvax.de> <1482239868.3440312.824757033.31142D42@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20161221022752.5bb9b9e6.freebsd@edvax.de> <1482323632.28622.825856145.13A98A71@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20161221152544.6830e7ec.freebsd@edvax.de> <1482337312.81882.826068289.35F915A2@webmail.messagingengine.com> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-cloud-security-sender: freebsd@edvax.de X-cloud-security-recipient: questions@freebsd.org X-cloud-security-Virusscan: CLEAN X-cloud-security-disclaimer: This E-Mail was scanned by E-Mailservice on mailrelay10.qsc.de with 51B5068343E X-cloud-security-connect: mx01.qsc.de[213.148.129.14], TLS=1, IP=213.148.129.14 X-cloud-security: scantime:.2986 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 03:13:14 -0000 On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:21:52 +0100, swjatoslaw gerus wrote: > Dear Sir=20 >=20 > Thank you for your suggest .Most important points ... >=20 > 1. Zeitgeist belong to Gnome=20 At least to Gnome 3. You can probably go with MATE or Cinnamon if you want to use a Gnome 2 environment. If "Zeitgeist" cannot be removed from Gnome 3, it would probably be a no-go for me, too. > 2. Gnome is deafault for Ubuntu and Solaris 11.3 ,not for Free BSD=20 Correct. > 3. Some split of Solaris develop KDE=20 That is possible. > 4. Compiz - deafault for Ubuntu and Solaris Correct. > 5. Author have no any demand for any DE (with ZG and without) That's fine. :-) > 6. Is it possible to run FreeBSD with window manager without > DE ? Definitely. I'm doing this for decades now. :-) Refer to the online documentation and examples I have provided in the previous message. Basically, all you need to do is install the window manager you want (and there is plenty of choice), adjust ~/.xinitrc (or ~/.xsession if you're using a display manager), and it's done. It is actually not hard. The documentation will guide you through the process, so anything you need to do is just to "read, think, act". No software will be forced upon you. You just want a window manager? Try fvwm2. You don't like it? Deinstall it, install WindowMaker. With the "pkg" tool, it's easy. No manual downloading from the web, no handholding, no rebooting. :-) You can probably find some more inspiration here: https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/36382/ > If yes ,author will try FreeBSD=20 It's definitely worth a try. On the other hand, you could also try TrueOS (ex PC-BSD), which is a desktop-oriented variation of FreeBSD; in fact, it's FreeBSD plus additional software preinstalled and preconfigured. http://web.pcbsd.org/ https://www.trueos.org/ https://www.trueos.org/downloads/ It comes with an easy to use installer and is GUI based. > In Hamburg Systemadministrator von Universit=E4t Studenten Caffe =20 > versuchte > installieren f=FCr Autor 64-bit Ubuntu=20 > -ohne Erfolg ( tty arbeitsf=E4hig) ,vielleicht er wird helfen A university sysadmin should be able to install Ubuntu without any problem. If there is a problem, he should be able to identify it (for example, hardware not supported). But I can imagine that troubleshooting with Ubuntu isn't as easy as with FreeBSD. Hmmm... "shortage on professionals"... ;-) > Oder versuchen ab Anfang reinforced Linux ? FreeBSD isn't as popular as Linux, but it's definitely not inferior, especially not because of the property of "usage share". --=20 Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Dec 22 04:01:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29218C8BD7D; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 04:01:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hhsheng@corp.netease.com) Received: from corp-front03-corp.i.nease.net (corp-front03-corp.i.nease.net [123.58.164.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CD9158B; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 04:01:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hhsheng@corp.netease.com) Received: from E13D (unknown [218.107.55.252]) by corp-front03-corp.i.nease.net (Coremail) with SMTP id sKR4CgD3PDIlTltY_uAAAA--.120S2; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:53:09 +0800 (HKT) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:53:08 +0800 From: =?GB2312?B?yqK727uq?= To: freebsd-questions , freebsd-bugs Subject: question about fopen fd limit X-Priority: 3 X-Has-Attach: no X-Mailer: Foxmail 7, 2, 5, 140[cn] Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <2016122211530807976976@corp.netease.com> X-CM-TRANSID: sKR4CgD3PDIlTltY_uAAAA--.120S2 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvJXoW7tryDCr18tw4kCw1UAr1rXrb_yoW8Zw1xpa 1ag392krWkJa4xWryvk3yI9F1Sq3y3K3yYqr1fJryqkr1Ygrs3Xrs3tFs09a4UG3ZI9ryj qa1DtFWDArs5ZaDanT9S1TB71UUUUUUqnTZGkaVYY2UrUUUUjbIjqfuFe4nvWSU5nxnvy2 9KBjDU0xBIdaVrnRJUUjbmb7IF0VCYb41lb7IF0VCYb415M7k042IE4IxYO2xFxVAqjxCE w4Av424lb7Iv0xC_Zr1lb4IE77IF4wAFc2x0x2IEx4CE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrJVCq3w A2ocxC64kIII0Yj41l84x0c7CEw4AK67xGY2AK021l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvE14v26w1j 6s0DM28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_Gc CE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2kK67ZEXf0FJ3sC6x9vy-n0Xa0_ Xr1Utr1kJwI_Jr4ln4vE4IxY62xKV4CY8xCE548m6r4UJryUGwAa7VA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI 8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq3VA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_tr0E3s0E7I0Y6sxI4wAa 7VA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVW0oVCq3VA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIE14v26rxl6s 0q6x02cVCv0xWlnx0E84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_GcCE3s0E7I0Y6sxI4wAa 7VCE64xvF2IEb7IF0Fy264xvF2IEb7IF0Fy264kE64k0F2IE7I0Y6sxI4wAS0I0E0xvYzx vE52x082IY62kv0487Mc804VCqF7xvr2I5Mc02F40En4AKxVAvwIkv4cxYr24l5I8CrVC2 j2CEjI02ccxYII8I67AEr4CY67k08wAv7VACjcxG62k0Y48FwI0_Cr0_Gr1UMcIj6x8Erc xFaVAv8VW8ZwAm72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IYc2Ij64vIr41lFcxC0VAYjxAx ZF0Ew4CEw7xC0wACY4xI67k04243AVC20s07Mx8GjcxK6IxK0xIIj40E5I8CrwCjxxvEa2 IrMxkFs20EY4vE77kJMxkFs20EY4vE44CYbxCE4x80FwCY02Avz4vE14v_Gr4lc2IjII80 xcxEwVAKI48JMxAIw28IcxkI7VAKI48JMxAIw28IcVCjz48v1sIEY20_GFyl4x8a64kIII 0Yj41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1l4IxY624lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2 0s026x8GjcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1Y6r17MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMI IF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r1j6r4UMIIF 0xvE42xK8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrZr1j6s0DMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4 A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Jr0_Gr1l6VACY4xI67k04243AbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxU q2-eUUUUU X-CM-SenderInfo: xkkvxv1qj6u0tuso0v5whd2voofrz/1tbiAgARBVUojrojgQADs+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="GB2312" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 04:01:47 -0000 aGkgYWxsLA0KDQogICBoaX4NCiAgIHdlIGFyZSBmcm9tIENoaW5lc2UgR2FtZSBEZXZlbG9wIENv cnAsIE5ldGVhc2UuDQogICBhbmQgT25lIG9mIG91ciBwcm9kdWN0IHVzaW5nIEZyZWVCc2QgYXMg aXRzIE9TIHBsYXRmb3JtLg0KICAgVGhpcyBHYW1lIGhhcyBNaWxsaW9ucyBvZiBwbGF5ZXJzIG9u bGluZSAsIGFuZCBFYWNoIFNlcnZlciBtYXkgaG9sZHMgMjUwMDArIHRjcCBjb25uZWN0aW9uIGF0 IHRoZSBzYW1lIHRpbWUuVGhhbmtzIHRvIEJTRCBhbmQga3F1ZXVlIDopDQoNCiAgIGZvciBleGFt cGxlLCBpdCdzIG9uZSBvZiBvdXIgc2VydmVyICwgbmV0c3RhdCBjbWQgdG8gbGlzdCBjb25uZWN0 aW9ucyBvdmVyYWxsLi4uDQogICBuZXRzdGF0IC1hbiB8IGdyZXAgMTMzOTYgKGl0J3Mgb3VyIGxp c3RlbmluZyBwb3J0KSB8IHdjIC1sIA0KICAgMjMyMjENCg0KICAgIHJlY2VudGx5IHdlIGRvIHNv bWUgcGVyZm9ybWFuY2Ugb3B0aW1pemUgYW5kIHByb21vdGUgdGhpcyBjb25uZWN0IGxpbWl0IHRv IDI4MDAwKyBvciAzMDAwMCsuDQogIEJ1dCB3ZSBmaW5kIEZyZWVic2QgaGFzIGEgbGltaXQgdGhh dCB0aGlzIGh1Z2Ugb25saW5lIG51bWJlciB3aWxsIHRha2UgMjgwMDArIGZkLCBhbmQgYnNkIEZJ TEUgKiBzdHJ1Y3QncyANCiAgZmQgb25seSBzdXBwb3J0IHRvIFNIT1JUIC4gc3VjaCBhcyAuLg0K DQpzdHJ1Y3QgX19zRklMRSB7DQogLi4uDQogc2hvcnQgX2ZpbGU7IC8qICgqKSBmaWxlbm8sIGlm IFVuaXggZGVzY3JpcHRvciwgZWxzZSAtMSAqLw0KIC4uLg0KDQogIHNvIGlmIG91ciBzZXJ2ZXIg d2FudCB0byBmb3BlbiBzb21lIGZpbGUgd2hlbiB3ZSBzdGlsbCBob2xkIHRoaXMgb25saW5lIG51 bWJlciwgdGhlIGZkIGFtb3VudCBtYXkgZWFzaWx5IGV4Y2VlZA0KMzI3NjcsIGFuZCBmb3BlbiBk ZWZpbml0ZWx5IHJldHVybiBhIGVyciBjb2RlLiB0aGVuIHRoZSBzZXJ2ZXIgd2lsbCBhcHBlYXIg c29tZSBmYXRhbHkgRVJST1IuIA0KDQogIHdlIGRvIGEgc2ltcGxlIHRlc3QgYW5kIGNvbmZpcm0g dGhpcyBzaXR1YXRpb24uDQoNCiAgdGhlbiBpbiBmb3BlbidzIGNvZGUgLCB3ZSBub3RpY2UgdGhh dCB3ZSBjYW4gdXNlIG9wZW4gdG8gcmV0dXJuIGEgZmQgaW5zdHJlYWQgb2YgZm9wZW4gdG8gYXZv aWQgdGhpcyBvdmVyZmxvdywgDQogICBhcyBiZWxvdw0KDQo2OCAvKiANCjEgKiBGaWxlIGRlc2Ny aXB0b3JzIGFyZSBhIGZ1bGwgaW50LCBidXQgX2ZpbGUgaXMgb25seSBhIHNob3J0LiANCjIgKiBJ ZiB3ZSBnZXQgYSB2YWxpZCBmaWxlIGRlc2NyaXB0b3IgdGhhdCBpcyBncmVhdGVyIHRoYW4gDQoz ICogU0hSVF9NQVgsIHRoZW4gdGhlIGZkIHdpbGwgZ2V0IHNpZ24tZXh0ZW5kZWQgaW50byBhbiAN CjQgKiBpbnZhbGlkIGZpbGUgZGVzY3JpcHRvci4gSGFuZGxlIHRoaXMgY2FzZSBieSBmYWlsaW5n IHRoZSANCjUgKiBvcGVuLiANCjYgKi8NCg0KDQogIEJVVCAuLi4gc28gbWFueSBjIGxpYiBGSUxF IHNlcmllcyBmdW5jdGlvbiBuZWVkcyBhIEZJTEUgKiBwb2ludGVyIGFzIGlucHV0IGFyZ3VtZW50 LCB3ZSBjYW4ndCBjb252ZXJ0IGFsbCBvZiB0aGVtIHRvIGZkLCANCm9yIGl0IHdpbGwgYmUgYSBy YXRoZXIgc3VmZmVyaW5nIHRoaW5ncyB0byB1cy4gDQoNCiAgYW5kIGV2ZW4gaW4gQlNEIDEwICwg aXQgc2VlbXMgdGhpcyBzaG9ydCBsaW1pdCBzdGlsbCB0aGVyZSAsIGJ1dCBvdGhlciBPUyBhcyBk ZWJpYW4gLCBGSUxFIHN0cnVjbnQncyBmaWxlbm8gaXMgYSBpbnQgLg0KICANCiAgd2UgZm91bmQg YW4gdW5vZmZpY2FsIHBhdGNoIGVhc2lseSBjaGFuZ2UgdGhpcyBmaWxlbm8gdG8gdW5zaWduZWQg LCBidXQgd2UgYXJlIGEgdmVyeSBzdHJlYWR5IHByb2plY3QsIHdlIGNhbid0IGFmZm9yZCB0aGUg cmlzaw0KdG8gdXNlIGFuIHVub2ZmaWNhbCBwYXRjaC4NCg0KICBzbywgZG8geW91IGhhdmUgYW55 IHBsYW4gdG8gY2hhbmdlIHRoaXMgZm9wZW4gZmQgbGltaXQgdG8gVU5TSUdORUQgU0hPUlQgb3Ig aW50IGluIHRoZSBmdXR1cmUgPyB1c2hvcnQgaXMgZW5vdWdoIGZvciB1cyAuIA0KICBpZiB5b3Ug ZG8gLCB3ZSBhcmUgcmVhbGx5IGdsYWQgYW5kIGV4Y2l0ZWR+fn5+fn5+aWYgeW91IGRvbid0ICxp dCBkb25lbid0IG1hdHRlciwgIHBseiBnaXZlIHVzIGEgcmVwbHkgc28gdGhhdCB3ZSBtYXkgbmVl ZCB0byANCiAgZmluZCBzb21lIG90aGVyIHBsYW4gdG8gcmVzb2x2ZWQgdGhpcyBzdWZmZXJpbmcg dGhpbmcuDQogIExvTCwgdGhhbmsgeW91ICEhISEhDQoNCnlvdXJzIHNpbmNlcmVseQ0KICAgICAg ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgd2luc29uIHNoZW5nDQoNCg0Kd2luc29u IHNoZW5nDQo= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Dec 22 05:53:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511E1C8CCD6 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 05:53:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@geeks.org) Received: from mail.geeks.org (mail.geeks.org [IPv6:2001:4980:3333:1::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38BDE11C8 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 05:53:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@geeks.org) Received: from mail.geeks.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by after-clamsmtpd.geeks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA8211022A for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 23:53:29 -0600 (CST) Received: by mail.geeks.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 960EC110229; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 23:53:29 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 23:53:29 -0600 From: Doug McIntyre To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: mandoc.db keeps changing in 11.0-RELEASE? Message-ID: <20161222055329.GA81847@geeks.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 05:53:31 -0000 I've seen this happen on several FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE systems I run. I have 'freebsd-update cron' running each night. And from time to time, I'll get a whole slew of notices about mandoc.db changing. Ie. this system is already at 11.0-RELEASE-p5.. $ freebsd-version 11.0-RELEASE-p5 And for a notice I get via email.. Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... none found. Fetching metadata signature for 11.0-RELEASE from update.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. The following files will be updated as part of updating to 11.0-RELEASE-p5: /usr/share/man/mandoc.db /usr/share/openssl/man/mandoc.db And of course, I could ignore it, and each night it'll bug me, or I can update it with 'freebsd-update install', and the notice goes away. So, what's up with the 11.0 build process that mandoc.db keeps getting touched or whatever it is? This happens on most of my 11.0-RELEASE machines from time to time. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Dec 22 10:01:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD1A7C8A047 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:01:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anna@bannersandbillboards.com) Received: from a2nlsmtp01-04.prod.iad2.secureserver.net (a2nlsmtp01-04.prod.iad2.secureserver.net [198.71.225.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D4B4D73 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:01:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anna@bannersandbillboards.com) Received: from a2plcpnl0740.prod.iad2.secureserver.net ([198.71.241.16]) by : HOSTING RELAY : with SMTP id K0Azc5Rdmp1O5K0AzcPZdo; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 03:00:41 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bannersandbillboards.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Subject:Reply-To:From:To:Date:Sender:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=NhqrPZRGhyBJ/YoS+3uFTzAVitouOa9Ar4igtoE7diw=; b=SKCfnh7GCOptdxqK+BXi5JNCj nxrFVQEOiTqr/vQl806fxRDV/ImTYNXiPjoWCUNHBUpynEHVhQnIuoUpOIV5XNFgn+IbhGmm4KNke JPCwh83RqCFIVSqnRAGUy4md7E9DQ08QD11GBbzE+XK2QaE2udlQHD6cRCrwigKuIY5yrh8Uuqz5J NibP6qFSYHjd3hVEREoIMDYILpknP+U6WbyE72Ucg5oXdSqyEc2P2VuvKLolU/+DzcPpv55kVlTg8 KD5jCeyel+rkgn9VAT63J3N682OeFoh8wEqSgnfeQE6qXs6M92XdPogQRimYodSiVn15aFiwftHYX wFh1PWYhQ==; Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port=47781 helo=bannersandbillboards.com) by a2plcpnl0740.prod.iad2.secureserver.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cK0Az-002DlN-Is for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 03:00:41 -0700 Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:00:36 +0000 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" From: "BannersAndBillboards.com" Reply-To: "BannersAndBillboards.com" Subject: Controlled keywords traffic for better drive Message-ID: <73c9706acaf754f02fd41201151ea449@bannersandbillboards.com> X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.2.13 (https://github.com/PHPMailer/PHPMailer) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - a2plcpnl0740.prod.iad2.secureserver.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - bannersandbillboards.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: a2plcpnl0740.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: authenticated_id: anna@bannersandbillboards.com X-Authenticated-Sender: a2plcpnl0740.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: anna@bannersandbillboards.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfMpa/JnVC8Ow+KoLzTJBFf+bWZtq5Shq4SDFJG9avJ0LufYfysBRyJZGV9XFHilFe81xYAJ+hjWiQKgRIN3wu8qwuleFCFMoQJdfawWdgLawOww0HlVd xtXM6bmJQ3N5Znjkxshw4jb124QlFlO8JJWf92xYFYq4/17Cj+1afrHv2zBC6BzduXoW/5lKWcp+crICRAev+lvb7QnHZ1b3JiQGTt5F/QBj/kNedgODhCrc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:01:43 -0000 Hi, If you think that Pay-per-click advertising is truly suited for a small, targeted audience and it isn't a tool meant to serve the masses and be profitable do so, we can help you by providing your website banner be on top. We can give lock top position for your banner on search engine results during whole year and only your banner will be shown above all competitors when people search keywords that you want to own. If you are interested in getting your website URL above your competitors, you can contact us by phone or fill online quote on our website and we will analyze your website and keywords, and give you minimum monthly traffic guarantee. Best Regards From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Dec 22 13:56:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2355C8A607 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:56:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from BLU004-OMC2S29.hotmail.com (blu004-omc2s29.hotmail.com [65.55.111.104]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ADC5213; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:56:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bourne.identity@hotmail.com) Received: from EUR02-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.111.72]) by BLU004-OMC2S29.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Thu, 22 Dec 2016 05:56:23 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=85N+z/UWLAeI3mUhbfp/48NzA4wCSLBfzvJoV2S/SIU=; b=q+MlSnEKM9plVl0iPptV4Py0e6QMyljLDvx1rlGTkHo2Na+HiAIB7ZXva/HsSAv6u/g3hshKzvR9j8YFNepNMa29ebB8jdlGsJ5Ph40u5dv7FD98IGcqRt9mmSYt4oVvf8gjQTofmjgY6LRIAK/Y3koo2eqdWSu8y6U0RheFJRWGLRS3c0wv4v5O57qi14JzBR5GYun6BilooktRAwmZyRwcycZ2lIidBSu/ZXK8scMqxyauu3J2B6wfUO5y+hGTUj+8KC0ni682zXxMT5T/7zusUI3VijUalN+y4mFrZg2HsJOTjcVTk+OWMp7ucDCh/cw2otkOdrWyVc0uKpGEVA== Received: from AM5EUR02FT045.eop-EUR02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.8.60) by AM5EUR02HT174.eop-EUR02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.9.119) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.761.6; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:56:05 +0000 Received: from VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.152.8.54) by AM5EUR02FT045.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.9.159) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.789.10 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:56:05 +0000 Received: from VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.162.28]) by VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.162.28]) with mapi id 15.01.0789.018; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:56:04 +0000 From: Manish Jain To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , "matthew@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 655, Issue 4 Thread-Topic: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 655, Issue 4 Thread-Index: AQHSXEr/LVIJp4cRbEW65oOtwAnUGaET/dUA Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:56:04 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: freebsd.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;freebsd.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=hotmail.com; x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:339F3741CA1E5190568F29421963457A2586E40F90A80E4B338935E9FEACC6D7; UpperCasedChecksum:A20E0B4CB5955C0B73F6605BE47B5260184EB9A21E2CB730D3357DFFCFF06BFC; SizeAsReceived:7317; Count:36 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-incomingheadercount: 36 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AM5EUR02HT174; 7:HONndOErBa5PeNEdsJeas5HcSPgncSWr6228jSDVYl+dudC+vsU4ZLKdVV1QWQh7oQkJuq9A1pNs8m/i0XlAS0mlxtlAa+jgTF+KLLiuTvlEmdSrbUKKxhlne5UmBcX+7xTQfTixy8wFTQuF7eqr7IgNO5I00Snr7hxvpbVx8YH9lMZponngA2IGkEO7ujHgIzyOOF68nI8/gzeS2sosTUbuZbLfxtuPgA0zlf+OI4aXTwGaFucivyMgT1UvVU9D8H+f/7kL/KKJ/Wzk9eBLobQD7zA1kV/pb+xB4wqycU/Ux0v0Md+31OlRUhQ+1A/GzqHF1s2ztFzc7xddp06Siey6AsjOPuAvcoPgM3gpUxavMy3w3fNgBNUwmbwAVrSXskkfQY69TMHi1fX/pa+b5FvGutYpOpiBVHxkL6QbWu8TYx/bnY0n+qOJdyEiXSuj0hAbjBHDRvpwxkNUXZeukw== x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AM5EUR02HT174; H:VI1PR02MB0974.eurprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 59a3fa88-6137-4256-bf5d-08d42a724479 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(1601124038)(1603103113)(1601125047); SRVR:AM5EUR02HT174; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444111334)(444112120)(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:AM5EUR02HT174; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:AM5EUR02HT174; x-forefront-prvs: 01644DCF4A spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-ID: <0FD13B59F07EB84D83A63E41DC65B2E9@eurprd02.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Dec 2016 13:56:04.8295 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5EUR02HT174 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Dec 2016 13:56:23.0717 (UTC) FILETIME=[2E62C550:01D25C5B] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:56:30 -0000 On 12/22/16 17:30, freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org wrote: > Hi, Manish, > > The best thing to do here is to open a PR with what details of the crash > you can extract from the core dump. You have a full system core, so you > should be able to follow the instructions here, and extract a backtrace > from the kernel: > > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/developers-handbook/ker= neldebug-gdb.html Hello Matthew, That URL says that first I have to 'locate the debug version of your=20 kernel (normally called kernel.debug)'. Now, I am running the standard generic kernel that was installed by the=20 FreeBSD 11 amd64 setup CD. The command 'locate kernel.debug' returns an=20 empty string. Does that mean I have to build a debug version of my kernel before I can=20 use kgdb ? The previous time I had a crash (in October), I filed a PR at FreeBSD=20 bugzilla, but nobody followed up. I suppose nobody can devote too many=20 resources to follow up on an isolated problem. Thanks for your help Manish Jain From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Dec 22 15:15:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92C3C8BCD4 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 15:15:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FCB21C3C for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 15:15:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id uBMF2Zl5018686; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 02:02:36 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 02:02:35 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: hhsheng@corp.netease.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question about fopen fd limit In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20161223015110.X26979@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 15:15:09 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 655, Issue 4, Message: 10 On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:53:08 +0800 ??? wrote: > hi all, > > hi~ > we are from Chinese Game Develop Corp, Netease. > and One of our product using FreeBsd as its OS platform. > This Game has Millions of players online , and Each Server may > holds 25000+ tcp connection at the same time.Thanks to BSD and kqueue > :) > > for example, it's one of our server , netstat cmd to list > connections overall... > netstat -an | grep 13396 (it's our listening port) | wc -l > 23221 > > recently we do some performance optimize and promote this connect > limit to 28000+ or 30000+. > But we find Freebsd has a limit that this huge online number will > take 28000+ fd, and bsd FILE * struct's fd only support to SHORT . > such as .. > > struct __sFILE { > ... > short _file; /* (*) fileno, if Unix descriptor, else -1 */ > ... > > so if our server want to fopen some file when we still hold this > online number, the fd amount may easily exceed 32767, and fopen > definitely return a err code. then the server will appear some fataly > ERROR. > > we do a simple test and confirm this situation. > > then in fopen's code , we notice that we can use open to return a > fd instread of fopen to avoid this overflow, as below > > 68 /* > 1 * File descriptors are a full int, but _file is only a short. > 2 * If we get a valid file descriptor that is greater than > 3 * SHRT_MAX, then the fd will get sign-extended into an > 4 * invalid file descriptor. Handle this case by failing the > 5 * open. > 6 */ > > > BUT ... so many c lib FILE series function needs a FILE * pointer > as input argument, we can't convert all of them to fd, or it will be > a rather suffering things to us. > > and even in BSD 10 , it seems this short limit still there , but > other OS as debian , FILE strucnt's fileno is a int . > > we found an unoffical patch easily change this fileno to unsigned , > but we are a very stready project, we can't afford the risk to use an > unoffical patch. > > so, do you have any plan to change this fopen fd limit to UNSIGNED > SHORT or int in the future ? ushort is enough for us . > if you do , we are really glad and excited~~~~~~~if you don't ,it > donen't matter, plz give us a reply so that we may need to > find some other plan to resolved this suffering thing. > LoL, thank you !!!!! > > yours sincerely > winson sheng If you do not get a useful response here, I recommend reposting this to freebsd-net@freebsd.org where it will much more likely catch the eye of people who work with network code. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Dec 22 15:45:30 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A108C8B672 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 15:45:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4ea:bd49:619b:6cb3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C34851146 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 15:45:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:1c1d:86a1:a200:b700]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3EC7DA18A; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 15:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/3EC7DA18A; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 655, Issue 4 To: Manish Jain , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <736117a3-6965-1843-d8bd-4a81b7131c36@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 15:45:19 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UD8QA62DruHqD50cXjbPgfJnfrhstR1Fo" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 15:45:30 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --UD8QA62DruHqD50cXjbPgfJnfrhstR1Fo Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="ITieePWfINHv1qqSitbmUUB7m8UXlqmIF"; protected-headers="v1" From: Matthew Seaman To: Manish Jain , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <736117a3-6965-1843-d8bd-4a81b7131c36@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 655, Issue 4 References: In-Reply-To: --ITieePWfINHv1qqSitbmUUB7m8UXlqmIF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 22/12/2016 13:56, Manish Jain wrote: > That URL says that first I have to 'locate the debug version of your=20 > kernel (normally called kernel.debug)'. >=20 > Now, I am running the standard generic kernel that was installed by the= =20 > FreeBSD 11 amd64 setup CD. The command 'locate kernel.debug' returns an= =20 > empty string. Good question. On a system built from source, you'ld want either: /usr/lib/debug/boot/kernel/kernel.debug or /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC/kernel.debug but you don't have either of those when using a -RELEASE kernel IIRC. Well, certainly not the last one. Failing that, I'm afraid that I do not know how you're meant to be able to get a decent backtrace out of a RELEASE kernel. Cheers, Matthew --ITieePWfINHv1qqSitbmUUB7m8UXlqmIF-- --UD8QA62DruHqD50cXjbPgfJnfrhstR1Fo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYW/UVXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATp3AP/1y7oqts0X94KxQtXkzytkzv B76CEO7UnGTPhfjYkym6iIC0wTQL11efjw2NYRqUc9LwL+GYsr0kiW+vC1l9z3ZO +Sl2UPhV/6STDkR9qUz6+RHlhuLTf1BaqMRVTYFKcUY1MI4oxEDpT5erGFCJS7PR dZaqFT5sLwyPnB06+SwDsfBxBPUyYUHhQHf/MYer8GS6xrI9oEqWbv7erPvkrD3u tAKKiVyUhs1h8egkLhCdLuwhqYtkeDDtvNbhOYdHqClGiH6eZkJZSawUPB73vHza xfxlq8V8EmLpcw0z3uQgoE6V6SpDLCATGUMd3ZAwBwHKjAEfKfyO5fyK4m9CguPl 6tTtV20udTOo6+X1nOsjyubO9azDAqoEEOOwUjBayw3zoe5ge4O/N5YqHeQZf312 tmzpFQiWKQdHenq9g1k14pIHu9BDds5qtdV+M7c1p5tucNBlN8bG2jua9YLhriiq v6pJrnY5eyn3HA9ZqPh3NUocJE/WQDCTPWe0DvwEiwQ3xhk0Z9uDXO+tIaMpcB2Y 6qiGqHEwViEKYiojgJfnVLBFsfD40VeobpXnF7p3UgxrCh+ypzAPKm58veohwtPx qKneXswtoDleV36m+VzpDE8uFzsFjgM44Dx4XheUJZ7iNHRqqs4uCdhVGZwOTmEV GRU7NQZS49UHgvQj2cmP =gYWN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UD8QA62DruHqD50cXjbPgfJnfrhstR1Fo-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Dec 22 16:10:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BD52C8C0CD for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce.notrasno.62FADB@cl1.fidelizador.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007BB750 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce.notrasno.62FADB@cl1.fidelizador.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EFB2AC8C0CB; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:10:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF1E4C8C0CA for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:10:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce.notrasno.62FADB@cl1.fidelizador.org) Received: from mail44.fidelizador.org (mail44.fidelizador.org [200.55.200.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 768FC6E1 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:10:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce.notrasno.62FADB@cl1.fidelizador.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fidelizador.org; s=default; t=1482420985; bh=x9KpERG5M5x2fa1aCzmXh/cRM2s=; h=MIME-Version:Subject:From:Reply-To:To:Sender:Date:Message-Id; b=wohspg08RjBWhg4SGxq/v4x4DuRIh3DeBNAGmTFxhuAv/vNG3sjRSHkYMpqywOOfz e0re3kwArkbGrCSSNSgnRN0zjpmPQ+k3sZsHO1EjNqY4ZHtD6jqshGKrehnn1WgHyr ZKBX+v6y9UfCMpP0GJ3la1ga9zTFggD3oa9Ff8VI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: =?utf-8?q?Lanzamiento_de_pol=C3=ADtica_de_sustentabilidad_ambienta?= =?utf-8?q?l_del_MOP?= From: Portal Ondac Reply-To: contacto2@notrasnoches.com To: questions@freebsd.org Sender: bounce.notrasno.62FADB@cl1.fidelizador.org X-Sent-via: unsubscribe.notrasno.62FADB.F4E452C97D2B@cl1.fidelizador.org Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:36:16 -0300 Bounce-To: bounce.notrasno.62FADB@cl1.fidelizador.org Errors-To: bounce.notrasno.62FADB@cl1.fidelizador.org Message-Id: X-List: notrasno,62FADB,F4E452C97D2B Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Fidelizador 3.0 [http://www.fidelizador.com] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:10:06 -0000 =C2=A0 Si no puede ver este email haga clic aqu=C3=AD. {FIDE.BROWSERVIEW} =C2=A0 =C2=A0 [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A09= F1KA9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A090FK= A9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] =C2=A0 =C2=A0 BOLET=C3=8DN T=C3=89CNICO DE LA CONSTRUCCI=C3=93N N=C2=B033 _Diciembre de 2016_ = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 PUBLIRREPORTAJE =C2=A0 WEDI NUEVA SOLUCI=C3=93N CONSTRUCTIVA IMPERMEABILIZANTE [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A09B6K= A9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] Esta innovaci=C3=B3n es absolutamente inmejorable donde se necesita rapidez, impermeabilidad y aislaci=C3=B3n t=C3=A9rmica... _ver m=C3=A1s_ [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A09B6K= A9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 AN=C3=81LISIS DE PRECIOS UNITARIOS =C2=A0 ALFEIZAR HORMIG=C3=93N PREFABRICADO [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A0967K= A9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] _FAMILIA: OTROS REVESTIMIENTOS(KG)_ = =C2=A0 RED EXTERIOR ELECTRICIDAD [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A09DBK= A9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] _FAMILIA: INSTALACIONES ELECTRICAS (PC1)_ = =C2=A0 SIP FULLPANEL [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D= 2BJA9B76A09C8KA9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] _FAMILIA: OTROS REVESTIMIENTOS(KG)_ = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 NOVEDADES DEL MINISTERIO DE OBRAS PUBLICAS =C2=A0 LANZAMIENTO DE POL=C3=8DTICA DE SUSTENTABILIDAD AMBIENTAL DEL MOP [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A097DK= A9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] El Ministro de Obras P=C3=BAblicas, Alberto Undurraga, junto al Ministro de Medio Ambiente, Pablo Badenier, encabez=C3=B3 la ceremonia de lanzamiento de la Pol=C3=ADtica de Sustentabilidad Ambiental del MOP, iniciativa que se complementa con los compromisos de la Agenda de Eficiencia, Modernizaci=C3=B3n y Transparencia de la cartera... _ver m=C3= =A1s_ [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A097DK= A9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 NORMATIVAS LEGALES Y REGLAMENTARIAS =C2=A0 POL=C3=8DTICA DE SUSTENTABILIDAD AMBIENTAL DEL MINISTERIO DE OBRAS P=C3=9ABLICAS [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D= 2BJA9B76A09EBKA9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] DICIEMBRE DE 2016, DIRECCI=C3=93N DE OBRAS P=C3=9ABLICAS. Para que las obras de infraestructura sean ambientalmente sustentables y se logre una gesti=C3=B3n eficiente del recurso h=C3=ADdrico, en el Ministerio se han definido lineamientos y estrategias que est=C3=A1n en coherencia con las pol=C3=ADticas ambientales del Estado de Chile, los acuerdos internacionales suscritos en materias relacionadas, la institucionalidad y la normativa ambiental del pa=C3=ADs. Lo anterior ha sido plasmado en la Pol=C3=ADtica de Sustentabilidad Ambiental del Ministerio de Obras P=C3=BAblicas (MOP), la cual utiliza fundamentos de la antigua pol=C3=ADtica ambiental creada el a=C3=B1o 2001 y adem=C3=A1s incor= pora los objetivos y lineamientos estrat=C3=A9gicos ministeriales... _ver m=C3= =A1s_ [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A09EBK= A9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] = =C2=A0 PROGRAMA DE PROTECCI=C3=93N DEL PATRIMONIO FAMILIAR. [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76ABC0EK= A9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] RESOLUCI=C3=93N 7859, D.O. 13 DE DICIEMBRE DE 2016, MINISTERIO DE VIVIENDA Y URBANIZACI=C3=93N. Se ha estimado necesario modificar la resoluci=C3=B3n exenta N=C2=BA 3.663 = (V. y U.), de 2016,que llama a postulaci=C3=B3n extraordinaria para el desarrollo de proyectos del Programa de Protecci=C3=B3n del Patrimonio Familiar, destinados a la atenci=C3=B3n de condominios de viviendas econ=C3=B3micas, para las regiones de Valpara=C3=ADso, Maule, Biob=C3=ADo y Metropolitana; fija condiciones para su aplicaci=C3=B3n, el monto de recursos disponibles y su forma de distribuci=C3=B3n para cada regi=C3=B3n,= a fin de modificar los plazos correspondientes al proceso de selecci=C3=B3n de proyectos..... _ver m=C3=A1s_ [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76ABC0EK= A9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 NORMATIVA TRIBUTARIA PARA LA CONSTRUCCI=C3=93N =C2=A0 =C2=A0 VENTA DE SITIOS ERIAZOS, DESPROVISTOS DE TODO TIPO DE EDIFICACIONES Y CONSTRUCCIONES, NO SE ENCUENTRA AFECTA A IVA. [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76ABCFFK= A9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] OFICIO 318, DE 18 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2016, SERVICIO DE IMPUESTOS INTERNOS. Se concluye que la venta de sitios eriazos, desprovistos de todo tipo de edificaciones y construcciones, incluyendo en este concepto a las urbanizaciones, no se encuentra afecta a IVA, por no configurarse a su respecto el hecho gravado b=C3=A1sico de =E2=80=9Cventa=E2=80=9D, contenido= en el Art. 2=C2=B0, N=C2=B0 1, del D.L. N=C2=B0 825, que excluye expresamente a los terrenos... _ver m=C3=A1s_ [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FA= DBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76ABCFFKA9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] =C2=A0 =C2=A0 NORMATIVA DE LA CONSTRUCCI=C3=93N =C2=A0 PLANIFICACI=C3=93N URBANA. TIPO DE USO DE SUELO. INFRAESTRUCTURA. [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76ABCDAK= A9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] CIRCULAR 495 (DDU 323), DE 30 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2016, JEFE DIVISI=C3=93N DE DESARROLLO URBANO. De conformidad a lo dispuesto en el art=C3=ADculo 4=C2=B0 de la Ley General= de Urbanismo y Construcciones (LGUC), se ha estimado necesario emitir la presente Circular con el prop=C3=B3sito de precisar si las edificaciones conocidas como "data center" corresponden o no al tipo de uso de suelo Infraestructura de conformidad a las disposiciones contenidas en el art=C3=ADculo 2.1.29. de la Ordenanza General de Urbanismo y Construcciones (OGUC) y a lo instruido en la Circular Ord. N=C2=B0 295 DDU 218 de fecha 29.04.2009... _ver m=C3=A1s_ [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76ABCDAK= A9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] = =C2=A0 ALTURA M=C3=81XIMA DE EDIFICACI=C3=93N. ELEMENTOS EXTERNOS UBICADOS EN LA PARTE SUPERIOR. [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C9= 7D2BJA9B76ABC7CKA9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] CIRCULAR 494 (DDU 322) DE 30 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2016, JEFE DIVISI=C3=93N DESARROLLO URBANO. Conforme a las facultades establecidas en el art=C3=ADculo 4=C2=B0 de la Ley General de Urbanismo y Construcciones (LGUC) se ha estimado necesario emitir la presente circular con el fin de impartir instrucciones respecto de si el emplazamiento de salas de m=C3=A1quinas y similares elementos exteriores de un proyecto acogido al art=C3=ADculo 6.1.8. de la OGUC, es factible cumpla con las condiciones impuestas por el inciso vig=C3=A9simo del art=C3=ADculo 2.6.3. de la Ordenanza General de Urbanismo= y Construcciones (OGUe) -referido a los "elementos exteriores ubicados en la parte superior de los ediflclos"-, vale decir, pueda sobrepasar la altura m=C3=A1xima permitida de 14 m... _ver m=C3=A1s_ [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76ABC7CK= A9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 JURISPRUDENCIA JUDICIAL =C2=A0 =C2=A0 RESPONDEN DE INDEMNIZACI=C3=93N POR ACCIDENTE A TRABAJADOR EMPRESA PRINCIPAL Y CONTRATISTA SI NO CUMPLIERON OBLIGACI=C3=93N DE HIGIENE Y SEGURIDAD [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA= 9B76ABCEAKA9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] ROL 1050-2016, DE 25 DE NOVIEMBRE DE 2016, CORTE DE APELACIONES DE VALPARA=C3=8DSO. = Si bien la acci=C3=B3n que ejercen los lesionados indirectos o v=C3=ADctimas por repercusi=C3=B3n es aut=C3=B3noma y no depende de la que la v=C3=ADctima directa pueda haber tenido en relaci=C3=B3n al agente del da=C3=B1o -de car=C3=A1cter contractual- lo cierto es que el hecho que causa el da=C3=B1o= a las primeras, est=C3=A1 dado, precisamente, por el da=C3=B1o ocasionado a la v=C3=ADctima directa -el cual se origina en el contexto de una determinada relaci=C3=B3n laboral- con quien aquellas ten=C3=ADan una especial relaci= =C3=B3n y, en consecuencia, les afecta de un modo personal. Es en virtud de lo anterior que a=C3=BAn cuando la pretensi=C3=B3n se ha deducido en sede civi= l, invoc=C3=A1ndose el r=C3=A9gimen de responsabilidad extracontractual genera= l, no puede desatenderse la circunstancia que sobre esta materia se ha introducido una modificaci=C3=B3n de car=C3=A1cter legal a partir de la vigencia de la Ley N=C2=B0 20.123... _ver m=C3=A1s_ [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76ABCEAK= A9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 NOTICIAS =C2=A0 CONAF COMIENZA CONSTRUCCI=C3=93N DEL PRIMER PARQUE URBANO NATURAL DE COCHRANE [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9= B76A2F01KA9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] M=C3=A1s de 120 personas se reunieron en la puesta en marcha de este proyecto, enmarcado en el programa de Gobierno +=C3=81rboles para Chile... _ver m=C3=A1s_ [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97= D2BJA9B76A2F01KA9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] = =C2=A0 CHILE LIDERA RANKING LATINOAMERICANO DE INVERSI=C3=93N EN ENERG=C3=8DAS RENOVABLES [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJ= A9B76A2FF0KA9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] Chile confirm=C3=B3 su liderazgo en materia de energ=C3=ADas sustentables en la =C3=BAltima versi=C3=B3n del New Energy Finance Climascope elaborado por Bloomberg New Energy Finance y el Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, alcanzando el primer lugar en inversi=C3=B3n de energ=C3=ADas renovables y = en la lucha contra en cambio clim=C3=A1tico, en la regi=C3=B3n de Am=C3=A9rica= Latina y el Caribe... _ver m=C3=A1s_ [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A2FF0K= A9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] = =C2=A0 C=C3=81MARA CHILENA DE LA CONSTRUCCI=C3=93N: VENTA DE VIVIENDAS CAER=C3=8DA= UN 40% EN 2017 [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B= 76A2FD5KA9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] La inversi=C3=B3n en construcci=C3=B3n cerrar=C3=ADa este a=C3=B1o con una = ca=C3=ADda de 0,2% y de 0,1 para 2017, seg=C3=BAn cifras de la C=C3=A1mara Chilena de la Construcci=C3=B3n... _ver m=C3=A1s_ [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A2FD5K= A9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] = =C2=A0 BID PRESTAR=C3=81 US$40 MILLONES PARA CONSTRUIR T=C3=9ANEL CHILE-ARGENTINA = EN LA CUARTA REGI=C3=93N [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4= E452C97D2BJA9B76A2F73KA9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] La cifra fue aprobada por el Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo (BID), luego de que accediera a realizar dos pr=C3=A9stamos, los que permitir=C3= =A1n poner en marcha la licitaci=C3=B3n coordinada del proyecto del t=C3=BAnel binacional Agua Negra, que conectar=C3=A1 la provincia de San Juan en Argentina con la de Coquimbo, en Chile... _ver m=C3=A1s_ [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A2F73K= A9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] = =C2=A0 PRESENTAN NUEVOS EST=C3=81NDARES PARA APOYAR LA CONSTRUCCI=C3=93N SUSTENTAB= LE EN CHILE [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9= B76A2FE5KA9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] Se presentaron en Chile los "Est=C3=A1ndares de Construcci=C3=B3n Sustentab= le para Viviendas" y el "Manual de Elementos Urbanos Sustentables", ambas impulsadas por el Minvu; y la metodolog=C3=ADa del Sistema Marco Proconstrucci=C3=B3n Sustentable, como un aporte al mejoramiento del =C3=A1= rea de la construcci=C3=B3n en el pa=C3=ADs.... _ver m=C3=A1s_ [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A2FE5K= A9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 CLIENTES PREMIUM DE NUESTRO PORTAL = =C2=A0 [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A2A= 00KA9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] =C2=A0 [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A2= AB9KA9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] =C2=A0 [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A2= AF1KA9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] =C2=A0 [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A2= A68KA9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=BFDESEA RECIBIR NUESTRO BOLET=C3=8DN T=C3=89CNICO DE LA CONSTRUCCI= =C3=93N MENSUALMENTE? INSCR=C3=8DBASE AQU=C3=8D [HTTPS://APP.GETRESPONSE.COM/SITE/CAPACITACION_CONSTRUCCION/WEBFORM.HTML?WI= D=3D1468903&U=3DSVVS&MG_PARAM3=3D4] =C2=A0 [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A2A= C7KA9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A2= A72KA9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] [http://tracker.cl1.fidelizador.com/LA9F05EG62FADBHF4E452C97D2BJA9B76A2= AE1KA9F05E566000F4FBCC937A54EF51] =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Desuscr=C3=ADbase {FIDE.REMOVESUBSCRIBER}=C2=A0|=C2=A0Reportar abuso {FIDE.ABUSE}=C2=A0|=C2=A0Privacidad {FIDE.PRIVACY}=C2=A0|=C2=A0Actualice su= s datos {FIDE.UPDATESUBSCRIBER} Este correo electr=C3=B3nico ha sido enviado a questions@freebsd.org a tr= av=C3=A9s de Fidelizador.com por Notrasnoches From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Dec 22 18:34:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC89C8CB0D for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 18:34:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plan.ventas@tuempresaactualizada.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27341982 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 18:34:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plan.ventas@tuempresaactualizada.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EEDBAC8CB0C; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 18:34:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE79BC8CB0B for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 18:34:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plan.ventas@tuempresaactualizada.com) Received: from mail3.tuempresaactualizada.com (mail4.tuempresaactualizada.com [107.150.32.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0FE1981 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 18:34:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plan.ventas@tuempresaactualizada.com) Received: from WIN-JL967LLBK95 (107.150.32.196) by mail3.tuempresaactualizada.com id hbge9o0our08 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:33:57 -0600 (envelope-from ) X-client: emp0019063 Message-ID: <9209a12d5e80da4b750936770010b850@tuempresaactualizada.com> From: "=?utf-8?Q?Compras_-_12_Conferencias_in=C3=A9ditas?=" To: Subject: Ventas - Tipo de Clientes, Nichos y Territorios Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 12:33:57 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 18:34:18 -0000 IA0KDQoxMiBjb25mZXJlbmNpYXMgcHJlZ3JhYmFkYXMgLyBEdXJhbnRlIDMgbWVzZXMgDQoNClDD s2xpemEgaW5kaXNwZW5zYWJsZSBwYXJhIA0KbG9zIHJlc3BvbnNhYmxlcyBkZSBWZW50YXMNCjEy IGNvbmZlcmVuY2lhcyBlbiBjYWRhIHDDs2xpemEsIHByZWdyYWJhZGFzLCBpbsOpZGl0YXMsIA0K cGFyYSBjYXBhY2l0YXIgYSB0b2RvIHN1IHBlcnNvbmFsICAgICAgIA0KIA0KQWwgYWRxdWlyaXIg bGEgUMOzbGl6YSBkZSBDYXBhY2l0YWNpw7NuLCB1c3RlZCBvYnRpZW5lIGFjY2VzbyBhIDEyIHRl bWFzIGVuZm9jYWRvcyBhbCDDoXJlYSBkZSBWZW50YXM7IHRlbWFzIGVzcGVjaWFsaXphZG9zIHF1 ZSBoYW4gc2lkbyBjdWlkYWRvc2FtZW50ZSBzZWxlY2Npb25hZG9zIHBvciBudWVzdHJvcyBleHBl cnRvcyBlbiBlbnRyZW5hbWllbnRvIGVqZWN1dGl2byBjb24gZWwgP24gZGUgYnJpbmRhciBhIGxh cyBlbXByZXNhcyBsYSBhY3R1YWxpemFjacOzbiBxdWUgbmVjZXNpdGFuIHBhcmEgbGxldmFyIHN1 IGNvbXBldGl0aXZpZGFkIGEgc3UgbcOheGltbyBwb3RlbmNpYWwuIFN1IHDDs2xpemEgbGUgYnJp bmRhIGFjY2VzbyBhIFRPREEgbGEgcHJvZ3JhbWFjacOzbiwgcGFyYSBhcHJvdmVjaGFybGEgY3Vh bmRvIHF1aWVyYSwgdG9kYXMgbGFzIHZlY2VzIHF1ZSBxdWllcmEgZHVyYW50ZSBzdXMgdHJlcyBt ZXNlcyBkZSBhY2Nlc28uICANCiJQcmVndW50ZSBwb3IgbnVlc3RyYSBQcm9tb2Npw7NuIE5hdmlk ZcOxYSBlbiBQw7NsaXphcyINCg0KVEVNQVJJTzoNCg0KMS4gVmVudGFzLCBNaSBQcm9mZXNpw7Nu IA0KDQoyLi0gUXXDqSBWZW5kbyBZIGVuIHF1w6kgQmVuZWZpY2lhIGFsIENsaWVudGUgDQoNCjMu LSDCv1kgRMOzbmRlIEVzdMOhbiBMb3MgUHJvc3BlY3Rvcz8gVGlwbyBkZSBDbGllbnRlcywgTmlj aG9zIHkgVGVycml0b3Jpb3MgDQoNCjQuLSBWZW50YXMgZGUgQ2FtYmFjZW8gDQoNCjUuLSBMb3Mg U2VjcmV0b3MgZGUgTGFzIFZlbnRhcyBUZWxlZsOzbmljYXMgDQoNCi0gWSBtdWNobyBtw6FzLg0K DQoNCiANCsK/UmVxdWllcmUgbGEgaW5mb3JtYWNpw7NuIGEgbGEgQnJldmVkYWQ/DQpyZXNwb25k YSBlc3RlIGVtYWlsIGNvbiBsYSBwYWxhYnJhOiANCkluZm8gLSBWZW50YXMuDQpjZW50cm8gdGVs ZWbDs25pY286IDAxODAwMjEyOTM5Mw0KDQoNCiANCsK/RGVtYXNpYWRvcyBtZW5zYWplcyBlbiBz dSBjdWVudGE/IFJlc3BvbmRhIGVzdGUgbWVuc2FqZSBpbmRpY2FuZG8gcXVlIHNvbG8gZGVzZWEg cmVjaWJpciBDQUxFTkRBUklPIHkgc8OzbG8gcmVjaWJpcsOhIHVuIGNvcnJlbyBhbCBtZXMuIFNp IGRlc2VhIGNhbmNlbGFyIGxhIHN1c2NyaXBjacOzbiwgc29saWNpdGUgc3UgQkFKQS4uDQogDQoN CiANCg0KIA0KDQo= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Dec 22 19:01:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 618F1C8D5EE for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 19:01:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x235.google.com (mail-wm0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E78F5100B for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 19:01:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x235.google.com with SMTP id g23so183574197wme.1 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:01:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ansU2EcGwgPjdGJRkX8JlsV/T3EoCn4zbvOUe0FklVA=; b=T2ZTMIFHz13YMhjYwfu/t6skdc5ahz1Yz3Gq/LwokAbKIG3XVjjzTkcbVwyYmmADM2 Ja40c3TtnF1DNaycUxJnyfA1vuCOkVSOA4aogmxc6zQ3EFxLvIOunWI9NVaNWlevv1p8 PcYqWoFcfQCFSW196ae8K6PeV1Yi9PypmkL+/HkcqwCBiCmI3NAbNEuFNgj+iBtaJdyK He4L1b3cRUOHpDoLy48m6EAtmsuLkgBX9XwgO7OXXx9UAXH+vHLq6ln3PRROFxD8mzQD 7aMWxT+XznIoWcPFdW7oFj6B54XVdktBEnZjeWCBvv2wkvqy8hgZfFABb/82aEBHEPWL 6FlQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ansU2EcGwgPjdGJRkX8JlsV/T3EoCn4zbvOUe0FklVA=; b=dUz7jZseT5YlS5UU/r1F6XvEE7FGF5ScINQJ+CTrx7xzj6yl3Phh0DF3o7oQ6VpYdc drKb+LWgwYIwDOX7nefQsfjkBy8vKHsIQLqOsKn4uhf3Yty/KxSaEpZRc/+mRV+SlLI3 sMQfTj9NzOcrpVL2y8yxXyl/gvtGoiLG0Lv6xU2XnUYj4TRHoBlIzyDrspSOnv/pQaqd +//iOgR12CDNPCAR0AsIBzSxUL/lBmJwipFlbCr5lMbojsKgpPezW8sOiScku4J/Qco3 xTvCxu7PyfySvEJQkZoYIWbXFVs7kYOrTDIzu/Mo5HC/Hwobw0Oxs8Cj2YyC0FrGgYT5 yIjw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXK5Dg/eUkGmR0JFTwI30IsNvgcDUhFWhFVKTjgrbCUKV60zMxiBKs+XrB5boRV/cUrU/5q2+7ZOifjvzg== X-Received: by 10.28.73.136 with SMTP id w130mr12458151wma.82.1482433298239; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:01:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.169.195 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 11:01:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20161217215104.39747954@archlinux.localdomain> References: <20161124123456.056654ff@archlinux.localdomain> <20161124171051.GA32472@becker.bs.l> <3E.0D.19237.9CB8A385@dnvrco-omsmta01> <20161127085920.3dc07007@moonstudio> <20161203175403.d51cba9f.freebsd@edvax.de> <20161217215104.39747954@archlinux.localdomain> From: Adam Vande More Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 13:01:37 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Replies to spam To: Ralf Mardorf Cc: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 19:01:40 -0000 On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 2:51 PM, Ralf Mardorf via freebsd-questions < freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> wrote: > >On 12/15/16, David I Noel wrote: > >> I'm currently in the process of creating a few hundred new email > >> addresses from which I will +1 this reply. > > That reminds me of > > https://gist.github.com/nocturnalgeek/1b8fa44283314544c487 > http://www.mogelmail.de/domains/M > > In response to this overall thread, it seems it's time for this again: https://craphound.com/spamsolutions.txt -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Dec 22 19:57:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556A8C8D7A0 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 19:57:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca", Issuer "CA HLL ISSUER 01" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2973F174B for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 19:57:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D68621CD for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:49:32 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at harte-lyne.ca Received: from inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iCuJWWW3wvD1 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:49:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from webmail.harte-lyne.ca (inet04.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 981146212C for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:49:28 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=harte-lyne.ca; s=dkim_hll; t=1482436168; bh=f2zKNhQUkbaHVQKJ4sMod82B0BGbRkaCnyS+p6UrH5c=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Reply-To; b=tMOpdIYYmYz8ST/QCnVfEmh9wFCr9feo+DMv5GGgm9N1Uj1jxmv7pVpq0/dPMfDom MIU1mYAkgEjGbeH2aBYwxmXB45+Xz12akwK1IFr6fQY/1VeKxHEGAbK11rg6w1hZ+G knoTcxsqVrQBtzEknUkecoWvBz7g/PuQUfIFuAJ2Ax/3TAe6IQbpuhWSCiEivswvAD ZXm7ypVO21oTRHocVphFgPznCNNKrkw32oXlVd+FmYweTakRqgmp9Oa0s0b8dBDSGq sAr2Nb9BDwt9jnH8Lqrhlhxre56nJiLzelghwgjaweMb8IqY9wj0mEgCgAXk2/TuXn n6Ls0bqbVZeeg== Received: from 216.185.71.44 (SquirrelMail authenticated user byrnejb_hll) by webmail.harte-lyne.ca with HTTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:49:28 -0500 Message-ID: <835b5b670caf869010764efd50341784.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:49:28 -0500 Subject: FBSD-11 Jails From: "James B. Byrne" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22-4.el6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 19:57:09 -0000 Now I am experimenting with jails. following the instructions found at https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails-ezjail.html I have employed ezjail to create a test. My rc.conf for the host system looks like this: # cat /etc/rc.conf ### Networks hostname=X ifconfig_vtnet0=Y defaultrouter=Z #gateway_enable="YES" # Enable as ipv4 LAN gateway #ipv6_gateway_enable="YES" # Enable as ipv6 LAN gateway ### Virtual IP aliases are defined in strict unbroken numerical order. ifconfig_vtnet0_alias0="inet 192.168.216.16 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_vtnet0_alias1="inet 192.168.216.23 netmask 255.255.255.0" ### Firewall pf_enable="YES" # Enable PF firewall on startup pflog_enable="YES" # Enable logging pflog_logfile="/var/log/pflog" # where pflogd should store the logfile pflog_flags="" # additional flags for pflogd startup ### Services local_unbound_enable="YES" # Enable caching only DNS ntpd_enable="YES" # Enable local network time server postfix_enable="YES" # Enable Postfix SMTP MTA sendmail_enable="NONE" # Disable Sendmail SMTP MTA sshd_enable="YES" # Enable ssh access ### Jailed Services #jail_enable="NO" # Disable starting of any jails jail_enable="YES" # Enable starting of any jails ezjail_enable="YES" # Use EZJail to manage cloned_interfaces="lo1" # For shared jail configuration jail_list="hlldrupal" # Space separated names of jails ### File system clear_tmp_enable="YES" # Clear /tmp on boot #dumpdev="NO" # Disable crash dumps dumpdev="AUTO" # Enable crash dumps zfs_enable="YES" # Enable zeta file-system I used ezjail-admin to create the instance: #ezjail-admin install #ezjail-admin create hlldrupal 'lo1|127.0.1.1,vtnet0|192.168.216.196' and used ezjail-admin console hlldrupal to configure the /etc files as outlined in the handbook. However, when I get to the section on updating jails and run the recommended commands then I see this: ezjail-admin update -u src component not installed, skipped Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 11.0-RELEASE from update5.freebsd.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. No updates needed to update system to 11.0-RELEASE-p6. No updates are available to install. Run '/usr/sbin/freebsd-update fetch' first. src component not installed, skipped Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 11.0-RELEASE from update5.freebsd.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. The following files will be added as part of updating to 11.0-RELEASE-p6: /usr/share/zoneinfo/Asia/Barnaul /usr/share/zoneinfo/Asia/Famagusta /usr/share/zoneinfo/Asia/Tomsk /usr/share/zoneinfo/Asia/Yangon /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Astrakhan /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Kirov /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Ulyanovsk Installing updates...mkdir: /usr/jails/newjail//boot: No such file or directory mtree: /usr/jails/newjail//boot/kernel: No such file or directorymtree: /usr/jails/newjail//boot/kernel.old: No such file or directory touch: /usr/jails/newjail//boot/kernel.old/.freebsd-update: No such file or directory Could not create kernel backup directory So, what is this telling me? Is there something that I have done or omitted doing that results in this error; or is there a problem with the documentation; or is there a problem with ezjail-admin? How is this supposed to work? -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Dec 22 21:25:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6975C8DFF2 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 21:25:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@mailbox.org) Received: from mx1.mailbox.org (mx1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.212]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.mailbox.org", Issuer "SwissSign Server Silver CA 2014 - G22" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99B67275 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 21:25:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@mailbox.org) Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56CA743B5A for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 22:25:13 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mailbox.org; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :subject:subject:from:from:message-id:date:date:received; s= mail20150812; t=1482441911; bh=/N9YLzkMmXVQXgny60c1qSAlsB+gPI2y/ +HkeAEPHRw=; b=RlSomFeUP0bFcbPBvV2vs1AihTOVzUeKVkC05UKuZC72Vy8Ov bK05tsOv0qA3ENO7xn9c3NehGFwSofVBbMusiogtusvw1VMSULjcUFPakUfP/Oiy 6hatB064jhQlc5ozuSvijkgm3rF0odjztpcpFmSxrSDnKNDxkS0qBmPRJP+uwJ+H YGc7wOne2G3AflSnbmNajj/1unAC3Mx4yxEPbLun8R2yXwk78Ab1K195lbZWy+Ng U+juRS3dyjGxJfAYzQ5a35CyCYwi/SNwwJsMPqLrjCinZMQzCxJPVfipRJT9UCS/ /JtC+xk1KR71oN9shW80U6JHGFE+twlwTIACg== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) (using TLS with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by spamfilter01.heinlein-hosting.de (spamfilter01.heinlein-hosting.de [80.241.56.115]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTPS id OzTD_cxx819V for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 22:25:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 22:25:09 +0100 Message-ID: <8637hfmzbe.wl-herbert@mailbox.org> From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FBSD-11 Jails In-Reply-To: <835b5b670caf869010764efd50341784.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> References: <835b5b670caf869010764efd50341784.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 21:25:21 -0000 James B Byrne via freebsd-questions skrev: > > Now I am experimenting with jails. following the instructions found > at > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails-ezjail.html > I have employed ezjail to create a test. My rc.conf for the host > system looks like this: > > # cat /etc/rc.conf > ### Networks > hostname=X > ifconfig_vtnet0=Y > defaultrouter=Z > #gateway_enable="YES" # Enable as ipv4 LAN gateway > #ipv6_gateway_enable="YES" # Enable as ipv6 LAN gateway > > ### Virtual IP aliases are defined in strict unbroken numerical order. > ifconfig_vtnet0_alias0="inet 192.168.216.16 netmask 255.255.255.0" > ifconfig_vtnet0_alias1="inet 192.168.216.23 netmask 255.255.255.0" > > ### Firewall > pf_enable="YES" # Enable PF firewall on startup > pflog_enable="YES" # Enable logging > pflog_logfile="/var/log/pflog" # where pflogd should store the logfile > pflog_flags="" # additional flags for pflogd startup > > ### Services > local_unbound_enable="YES" # Enable caching only DNS > ntpd_enable="YES" # Enable local network time server > postfix_enable="YES" # Enable Postfix SMTP MTA > sendmail_enable="NONE" # Disable Sendmail SMTP MTA > sshd_enable="YES" # Enable ssh access > > ### Jailed Services > #jail_enable="NO" # Disable starting of any jails > jail_enable="YES" # Enable starting of any jails > ezjail_enable="YES" # Use EZJail to manage > cloned_interfaces="lo1" # For shared jail configuration > jail_list="hlldrupal" # Space separated names of jails > > > ### File system > clear_tmp_enable="YES" # Clear /tmp on boot > #dumpdev="NO" # Disable crash dumps > dumpdev="AUTO" # Enable crash dumps > zfs_enable="YES" # Enable zeta file-system > > I used ezjail-admin to create the instance: > > #ezjail-admin install > #ezjail-admin create hlldrupal 'lo1|127.0.1.1,vtnet0|192.168.216.196' > > and used ezjail-admin console hlldrupal to configure the /etc files as > outlined in the handbook. > > However, when I get to the section on updating jails and run the > recommended commands then I see this: > > ezjail-admin update -u > src component not installed, skipped > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. > Fetching metadata signature for 11.0-RELEASE from > update5.freebsd.org... done. > Fetching metadata index... done. > Inspecting system... done. > Preparing to download files... done. > > No updates needed to update system to 11.0-RELEASE-p6. > No updates are available to install. > Run '/usr/sbin/freebsd-update fetch' first. > src component not installed, skipped > Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. > Fetching metadata signature for 11.0-RELEASE from > update5.freebsd.org... done. > Fetching metadata index... done. > Inspecting system... done. > Preparing to download files... done. > > The following files will be added as part of updating to 11.0-RELEASE-p6: > /usr/share/zoneinfo/Asia/Barnaul > /usr/share/zoneinfo/Asia/Famagusta > /usr/share/zoneinfo/Asia/Tomsk > /usr/share/zoneinfo/Asia/Yangon > /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Astrakhan > /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Kirov > /usr/share/zoneinfo/Europe/Ulyanovsk > Installing updates...mkdir: /usr/jails/newjail//boot: No such file or > directory > mtree: /usr/jails/newjail//boot/kernel: No such file or > directorymtree: /usr/jails/newjail//boot/kernel.old: No such file or > directory > > touch: /usr/jails/newjail//boot/kernel.old/.freebsd-update: No such > file or directory > Could not create kernel backup directory > > > So, what is this telling me? Is there something that I have done or > omitted doing that results in this error; or is there a problem with > the documentation; or is there a problem with ezjail-admin? How is > this supposed to work? I am not using ezjail. Maybe you have to modify /etc/freebsd-update.conf in the jail? --- etc/freebsd-update.conf.orig 2016-12-22 22:18:25.482993000 +0100 +++ etc/freebsd-update.conf 2016-12-22 22:18:37.722583000 +0100 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ ServerName update.FreeBSD.org # Components of the base system which should be kept updated. -Components src world kernel +Components world # Example for updating the userland and the kernel source code only: # Components src/base src/sys world -- Herbert From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Dec 22 21:56:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50E2C8D619 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 21:56:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca", Issuer "CA HLL ISSUER 01" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98CFE14F0 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 21:56:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8D3621CD for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:56:01 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at harte-lyne.ca Received: from inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1CQpZ3eAFQCk for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:56:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from webmail.harte-lyne.ca (inet04.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5AEB621C0 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:55:59 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=harte-lyne.ca; s=dkim_hll; t=1482443759; bh=U17Vlxv4YGQ7CpSC5SmQF1p9m7i+Ih576e/1CGtoaIs=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Reply-To; b=qgSn4pgCzPwjH/a9cv+kUkAALYoWWuh5LYGNxxr6ouDykcpBYwM6/Q+P9T4R7lY2r NSHfFDulOWbKDpKGLx3H/3gmp6hghy2nog9Czic5zDzukj9rT/5MDeZz48ngxQ/P4b o0T8dgwQxltVGGazsfzubP+UcuwVWQUt3BoN15SlYBoWLdf7PKyO8yZDy3H47HVTBV 8z51RJDsBDVun9nm2d1eWDin5nnRihtPuUDqTdY0iw22A8EalIezBMiV3ErUPu6xAZ ZyiZ/Gj9Wzb13I/qqNcmiJyDspLqq3PP33FEEUEKlLsj6GKF7bermqoti+TAGuOv/b 15Hx/mWZT/mnA== Received: from 216.185.71.44 (SquirrelMail authenticated user byrnejb_hll) by webmail.harte-lyne.ca with HTTP; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:55:59 -0500 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:55:59 -0500 Subject: IP address assignments to jails using ezjail From: "James B. Byrne" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22-4.el6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 21:56:03 -0000 When I created the new jail I used this invocation: ezjail-admin create -x hlldrupal 'lo1|127.0.1.1,vtnet0|192.168.216.196' Inside the host rc.conf I have this: # Cloned i/f and assigned ipv4 addr for jails cloned_interfaces="lo1" # For shared jail configuration And ifconfig on the host shows this: vtnet0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=80028 ether 00:a0:98:fa:aa:b6 inet 216.185.71.16 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 216.185.71.255 inet 192.168.216.16 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.216.255 inet 192.168.216.196 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.216.196 nd6 options=29 media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T status: active . . . lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=600003 inet 127.0.1.1 netmask 0xffffffff nd6 options=29 groups: lo Inside the jail ifconfig shows this: vtnet0: flags=8943 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=80028 ether 00:a0:98:fa:aa:b6 inet 192.168.216.196 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.216.196 media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T status: active lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=600003 groups: lo lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=600003 inet 127.0.1.1 netmask 0xffffffff groups: lo All this seems to be correct and yet I cannot seem to obtain an ssh connection to or from the jailed instance. ubound is running in the jail and seems to be working. At least host responds to queries. root@hlldrupal:~ # host sendmail.com sendmail.com has address 209.246.26.25 sendmail.com mail is handled by 10 mxa-00148501.gslb.pphosted.com. sendmail.com mail is handled by 20 mx2.proofpoint.com. sendmail.com mail is handled by 10 mxb-00148501.gslb.pphosted.com. pf is not running in the jail but sshd is: root@hlldrupal:~ # service sshd status sshd is running as pid 81502. root@hlldrupal:~ # service pf status Cannot 'status' pf. Set pf_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or use 'onestatus' instead of 'status'. root@hlldrupal:~ # service pf onestatus pf.ko is not loaded I note that the flag IFDISABLED is present on the host's lo1. Why? Is this the source of the connectivity problem with the jail? If so then why does the host commend work when executed within the jail? In any case I can ping the jail from without: [root@vhost04 ~ (master *%)]# ping 192.168.216.196 PING 192.168.216.196 (192.168.216.196) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 192.168.216.196: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.647 ms I just cannot connect to that address via ssh from without nor can I connect ssh to any address from within the jail. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Dec 23 03:25:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66F31C8C9C7 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 03:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x243.google.com (mail-pf0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ABB5195B for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 03:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf0-x243.google.com with SMTP id 127so3221919pfg.0 for ; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 19:25:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tl/9QwxiIVB6xYgcEw0Uo2L8h2pm2J+RmSfjCfTgqME=; b=EIQHmkfPzkckKGjJsmM6oC2qvA4pKS/z2IBwGpHAC+hVStCf4526zaTCE59XbkmqL+ re4bobHV4rasZnLa/veSjrfLtJrr+oqqOH7lZzfAx+1mix9kueMbIdHrGh4eyw8j4E6v t3rPynuL3hl6H2gWKYJhDITLwe2Y1nYUrnIppVMGQbrhM0kZmSCg0mcn/9o+8IsmI8Jz dQSqTweU9afEW+gZcyLaV4J8TfoxtyRNDbGTS7g6r+9txpSRVKlSTAd77y1FNrziS5Yv NJjAB34Wj9UMUbuKo8IacK6LZD3nXxvznHssPTPZoM9NxE/JiiW3yQKbKl2OVCmuVlLk Ow6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tl/9QwxiIVB6xYgcEw0Uo2L8h2pm2J+RmSfjCfTgqME=; b=BI4+nrv6IEY/l0+RH3lVqx1RyG+BhoBxd9tqTf7efkRQ55QstozT0fcRwLzFDJFWgv /kFw/ZDox4gjsH2amchLfNCqWPEQNeKgW6NM7liRgxnfuLHPVVmnETM4ggRRNmaphjZS +nR61lQLWB95j9DPxlrHFQbkO5KRYIafQRWl6hE6rmp7J226yWaLHFTt9ShNsM9PMApi HCUqXdpL/1NzIMcqQdvzWchkXfTXZ6dIP60RHKoPuht8CzY83tyNlafVCb/aNTQKMCk9 AJuoAUeCV5S9WX9fzux0rNrvDFPnLy3NwMy6WrEKnJpEbVcPKQEpQ8P6SgjvkmMRXS2k +c/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJVoes6D8/qsByj1XOfAo0usoejzekeYJQZ2wOsKQf23z21p82YXchc/yhswT5OJA== X-Received: by 10.84.171.1 with SMTP id k1mr25879624plb.169.1482463543672; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 19:25:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.103] ([120.29.76.197]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id y189sm57778680pfy.32.2016.12.22.19.25.41 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Dec 2016 19:25:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <585C993B.7040805@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:25:47 +0800 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IP address assignments to jails using ezjail References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 03:25:44 -0000 James B. Byrne via freebsd-questions wrote: > When I created the new jail I used this invocation: > > ezjail-admin create -x hlldrupal 'lo1|127.0.1.1,vtnet0|192.168.216.196' > > Inside the host rc.conf I have this: > > # Cloned i/f and assigned ipv4 addr for jails > cloned_interfaces="lo1" # For shared jail configuration > > And ifconfig on the host shows this: > > vtnet0: flags=8943 > metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=80028 > ether 00:a0:98:fa:aa:b6 > inet 216.185.71.16 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 216.185.71.255 > inet 192.168.216.16 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.216.255 > inet 192.168.216.196 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.216.196 > nd6 options=29 > media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T > status: active > . . . > lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > options=600003 > inet 127.0.1.1 netmask 0xffffffff > nd6 options=29 > groups: lo > > Inside the jail ifconfig shows this: > > vtnet0: flags=8943 > metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=80028 > ether 00:a0:98:fa:aa:b6 > inet 192.168.216.196 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.216.196 > media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T > status: active > lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > options=600003 > groups: lo > lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > options=600003 > inet 127.0.1.1 netmask 0xffffffff > groups: lo > > > All this seems to be correct and yet I cannot seem to obtain an ssh > connection to or from the jailed instance. ubound is running in the > jail and seems to be working. At least host responds to queries. > > root@hlldrupal:~ # host sendmail.com > sendmail.com has address 209.246.26.25 > sendmail.com mail is handled by 10 mxa-00148501.gslb.pphosted.com. > sendmail.com mail is handled by 20 mx2.proofpoint.com. > sendmail.com mail is handled by 10 mxb-00148501.gslb.pphosted.com. > > pf is not running in the jail but sshd is: > > root@hlldrupal:~ # service sshd status > sshd is running as pid 81502. > > root@hlldrupal:~ # service pf status > Cannot 'status' pf. Set pf_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or use > 'onestatus' instead of 'status'. > root@hlldrupal:~ # service pf onestatus > pf.ko is not loaded > > > I note that the flag IFDISABLED is present on the host's lo1. Why? Is > this the source of the connectivity problem with the jail? If so then > why does the host commend work when executed within the jail? In any > case I can ping the jail from without: > > [root@vhost04 ~ (master *%)]# ping 192.168.216.196 > PING 192.168.216.196 (192.168.216.196) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from 192.168.216.196: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.647 ms > > I just cannot connect to that address via ssh from without nor can I > connect ssh to any address from within the jail. > > 1. Loopback is only necessary in a jail if that jail has a service running that uses it. But you have to modify that services config file to use the loopback ip address you assigned to the jail before things work correctly. lo1 is not necessary, can assign any 127.x.x.x ip address to the jail as long as you don't assign the hosts default 127.0.0.1 ip address. 2. I use qjail which is a fork of ezjail. It automatically configures your network for you so you don't have to manually add statements into rc.conf for your jails. Since this is a learning test anyway, give it a try. 3. Take ubound out of the mix by not starting that jail. Then use only ip addresses in your host to jail ssh command. 4. What is output of issuing host ssh command to a jail? Does host answer? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Dec 23 17:01:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15CD2C8EADF for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 17:01:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [198.74.231.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E74365 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 17:01:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [198.74.231.63]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8582047ED2; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 12:01:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (doug@localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id uBNH1NGI079956; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 12:01:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id uBNH1MXx079952; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 12:01:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 12:01:22 -0500 (EST) From: doug Reply-To: doug@safeport.com To: byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IP address assignments to jails using ezjail In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 23 Dec 2016 12:01:23 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 17:01:25 -0000 On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, James B. Byrne via freebsd-questions wrote: > When I created the new jail I used this invocation: > > ezjail-admin create -x hlldrupal 'lo1|127.0.1.1,vtnet0|192.168.216.196' > > Inside the host rc.conf I have this: > > # Cloned i/f and assigned ipv4 addr for jails > cloned_interfaces="lo1" # For shared jail configuration > > And ifconfig on the host shows this: > > vtnet0: flags=8943 > metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=80028 > ether 00:a0:98:fa:aa:b6 > inet 216.185.71.16 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 216.185.71.255 > inet 192.168.216.16 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.216.255 > inet 192.168.216.196 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.216.196 > nd6 options=29 > media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T > status: active > . . . > lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > options=600003 > inet 127.0.1.1 netmask 0xffffffff > nd6 options=29 > groups: lo > > Inside the jail ifconfig shows this: > > vtnet0: flags=8943 > metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=80028 > ether 00:a0:98:fa:aa:b6 > inet 192.168.216.196 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.216.196 > media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T > status: active > lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > options=600003 > groups: lo > lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > options=600003 > inet 127.0.1.1 netmask 0xffffffff > groups: lo > > > All this seems to be correct and yet I cannot seem to obtain an ssh > connection to or from the jailed instance. ubound is running in the > jail and seems to be working. At least host responds to queries. > > root@hlldrupal:~ # host sendmail.com > sendmail.com has address 209.246.26.25 > sendmail.com mail is handled by 10 mxa-00148501.gslb.pphosted.com. > sendmail.com mail is handled by 20 mx2.proofpoint.com. > sendmail.com mail is handled by 10 mxb-00148501.gslb.pphosted.com. > > pf is not running in the jail but sshd is: > > root@hlldrupal:~ # service sshd status > sshd is running as pid 81502. > > root@hlldrupal:~ # service pf status > Cannot 'status' pf. Set pf_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or use > 'onestatus' instead of 'status'. > root@hlldrupal:~ # service pf onestatus > pf.ko is not loaded > > > I note that the flag IFDISABLED is present on the host's lo1. Why? Is > this the source of the connectivity problem with the jail? If so then > why does the host commend work when executed within the jail? In any > case I can ping the jail from without: > > [root@vhost04 ~ (master *%)]# ping 192.168.216.196 > PING 192.168.216.196 (192.168.216.196) 56(84) bytes of data. > 64 bytes from 192.168.216.196: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.647 ms > > I just cannot connect to that address via ssh from without nor can I > connect ssh to any address from within the jail. > > > -- > *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** > Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail > Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail The handbook suggests that getting loopback traffic is a good thing. That said none of our production systems do this and a number of the jails use sshguard via inetd. One of the original jail developers did not have a handy answer as to why, or if, this is a must. That said, it can't hurt. As to pinging, the answer provided by some very helpful people here, is ping -S. This assumes /etc/sysctl.conf has 'security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=1' and /usr/local/etc/ezjail/jail-name has: export jail_`jail-name`_parameters="allow.raw_sockets=1" If you read the thread [anyone know what 'ping: sendto: Can't assign requested" means'] it documents my rather painful acquisition of this knowledge :) From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Dec 23 19:17:47 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31AC1C8CABF for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 19:17:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) Received: from frv191.fwdcdn.com (frv191.fwdcdn.com [212.42.77.191]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8269328 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 19:17:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) Received: from [10.10.1.26] (helo=frv197.fwdcdn.com) by frv191.fwdcdn.com with esmtp ID 1cKV5I-000PKf-VF for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 21:00:52 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=ffe; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References: In-Reply-To:Message-Id:To:Subject:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=lcnnqj/RmWpSNkQWwP37x4K050wrn0a3NdZDZw178+I=; b=gtGf/nEdSnfpyQJuCu60Py2des FUGmqtmzcDAavFwSjAtGmcwzz73i0+HfpNIfSulILtlpMgj/QqABQAaourTOOYkXHNQY9OPEFYRnx BqKm6cBjA9wHgfDiwpAhyCpgG+SYTZ5bwbPmHlE8gIqoZ+BwTBTTLTsXcxmcx2wxUKY0=; Received: from [10.10.10.34] (helo=frv34.fwdcdn.com) by frv197.fwdcdn.com with smtp ID 1cKV5A-000O5b-DA for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 21:00:44 +0200 Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 21:00:44 +0200 From: Vladislav Prodan Subject: Re[2]: ZFS mount fails after upgrade to 11.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: mail.ukr.net 5.0 Message-Id: <1482519286.774978322.bvtkg7zq@frv34.fwdcdn.com> In-Reply-To: References: <1482008447.788498772.101qcjaz@frv34.fwdcdn.com> X-Reply-Action: reply Received: from universite@ukr.net by frv34.fwdcdn.com; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 21:00:44 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary Content-Disposition: inline X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 19:17:47 -0000 Sorry for the unhurried response. Please show output: zfs list gpart show camcontrol devlist diskinfo -v /dev/diskid/DISK-Z1E7725Jp2 diskinfo -v /dev/diskid/DISK-Z1E75J4Kp2 --- Original message --- From: "Erwan Legrand" Date: 17 December 2016, 23:51:46 > Hi Vladislav, > > On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Vladislav Prodan wrote: > > Compare the list of modules in the /boot/kernel and /boot/kernel.old > > Show output: zpool status > > I will compare the list of modules is at the end of this message. (The > lists are quite long.) I noticed that some GEOM modules have been > removed. (While the zfs and opensolaris modules exist in both > directories.) > > Here is the output of zpool status: > > """ > % zpool status > pool: tank > state: ONLINE > status: One or more devices are configured to use a non-native block size. > Expect reduced performance. > action: Replace affected devices with devices that support the > configured block size, or migrate data to a properly configured > pool. > scan: resilvered 103G in 0h45m with 0 errors on Fri Dec 16 22:47:06 2016 > config: > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > tank ONLINE 0 0 0 > mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > diskid/DISK-Z1E75J4Kp2 ONLINE 0 0 0 block > size: 512B configured, 4096B native > diskid/DISK-Z1E7725Jp2 ONLINE 0 0 0 block > size: 512B configured, 4096B native > > errors: No known data errors > """ > > The following modules are in /boot/kernel.old and not in /boot/kernel: > ahc_eisa.ko > aio.ko > dtnfsclient.ko > geom_bsd.ko > geom_fox.ko > geom_mbr.ko > geom_pc98.ko > geom_sunlabel.ko > geom_uncompress.ko > geom_vol_ffs.ko > if_ef.ko > if_faith.ko > if_ixgbe.ko > if_nve.ko > iw_cxgb.ko > iw_cxgbe.ko > krping.ko > lindev.ko > lockstat.ko > nfs_common.ko > nfsclient.ko > nfsserver.ko > ng_fec.ko > random.ko > reiserfs.ko > > While these modules are in /boot/kernel and not in /boot/kernel.old: > bcma.ko > bcma_bhndb.ko > bhnd.ko > bhnd_chipc.ko > bhnd_pci.ko > bhnd_pci_hostb.ko > bhnd_pcib.ko > bhndb.ko > bhndb_pci.ko > callout_test.ko > cc_dctcp.ko > cloudabi.ko > cloudabi64.ko > cuse.ko > cxgbei.ko > cyapa.ko > g_audio.ko > g_keyboard.ko > g_modem.ko > g_mouse.ko > gpiobus.ko > gpioiic.ko > gpioled.ko > gpiospi.ko > gsched_delay.ko > if_bwn_pci.ko > if_cs.ko > if_enc.ko > if_ep.ko > if_fe.ko > if_iwm.ko > if_otus.ko > if_rtwn.ko > if_ure.ko > if_xe.ko > ig4.ko > ioat.ko > isl.ko > iwm3160fw.ko > iwm7260fw.ko > iwm7265fw.ko > iwm8000Cfw.ko > iwn100fw.ko > iwn105fw.ko > iwn135fw.ko > iwn2000fw.ko > kern_testfrwk.ko > linuxkpi.ko > mdio.ko > nctgpio.ko > otusfw_init.ko > otusfw_main.ko > ow.ko > ow_temp.ko > owc.ko > padlock_rng.ko > proto.ko > random_OTHER.ko > random_fortuna.ko > random_yarrow.ko > rdrand_rng.ko > rtwn-rtl8192cfwU.ko > rtwn-rtl8192cfwU_B.ko > si.ko > siba.ko > siba_bhndb.ko > udl.ko > ugold.ko > videomode.ko > > Thanks, > > Erwan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Vladislav V. Prodan System & Network Administrator support.od.ua From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Dec 23 20:52:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD6EC8EB06 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 20:52:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca", Issuer "CA HLL ISSUER 01" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0F511EB3 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 20:52:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C64621CD; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 08:43:44 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at harte-lyne.ca Received: from inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6GXeKUMIqiw5; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 08:43:43 -0500 (EST) Received: from webmail.harte-lyne.ca (inet04.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A9296212C; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 08:43:42 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=harte-lyne.ca; s=dkim_hll; t=1482500623; bh=1DVnlwW5m+vtHePPx128ZvjgyearJkb5Q1ze7inck9A=; h=In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:Reply-To; b=ZON32XGlstjlpD+OXxcwq64lJjA0c9Jc0ZTiD35rCt37IGA8eEZRlYKMR6X0J9YHr +P0afoP2grrVenEDvts4HWMI2t5xzJo/IJ/Sp/h0ruuEfddnz88BjogQy9DPS/Y/It V69FUWB0Xs87gNu+vx7yNY2lF2ne1Qcra50bXYqr1YvUoXWcqkojF9CcMJwokT3r4u vqBWvGFnlXC3wdhcpKgAJhZx37bRt7RSxbQtbLACol3868umh2vxzyqzvplXRtna04 RI3bTRaaMy2fufxYo43sDE8pHxEkL69theiQMIAWJX3ZSQj3EhsL8RBT4IdikzORZv mUPYeLAiiST0A== Received: from 216.185.71.44 (SquirrelMail authenticated user byrnejb_hll) by webmail.harte-lyne.ca with HTTP; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 08:43:43 -0500 Message-ID: <2390554002144fa9a925e1f8bed14466.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> In-Reply-To: <585C993B.7040805@gmail.com> References: <585C993B.7040805@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 08:43:43 -0500 Subject: Re: IP address assignments to jails using ezjail From: "James B. Byrne" To: "Ernie Luzar" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Reply-To: byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22-4.el6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 20:52:10 -0000 On Thu, December 22, 2016 22:25, Ernie Luzar wrote: > > 3. Take ubound out of the mix by not starting that jail. Then use only > ip addresses in your host to jail ssh command. > > 4. What is output of issuing host ssh command to a jail? Does host > answer? > Inbound ssh to the jail works: $ ssh -vv 192.168.216.196 OpenSSH_5.3p1, OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013 debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug1: Applying options for * debug2: ssh_connect: needpriv 0 debug1: Connecting to 192.168.216.196 [192.168.216.196] port 22. debug1: Connection established. . . . Password for user1@hlldrupal: Outbound ssh from the jail does not: # ssh -vv 192.168.216.22 OpenSSH_7.2p2, OpenSSL 1.0.2j-freebsd 26 Sep 2016 debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config debug2: resolving "192.168.216.22" port 22 debug2: ssh_connect_direct: needpriv 0 debug1: Connecting to 192.168.216.22 [192.168.216.22] port 22. debug1: connect to address 192.168.216.22 port 22: Operation timed out ssh: connect to host 192.168.216.22 port 22: Operation timed out There is no firewall running on either the jail or the jail host. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Dec 23 21:16:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3787C8E093 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 21:16:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [198.74.231.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0EE1DA9 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 21:16:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [198.74.231.63]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4629E46FD3; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 16:16:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (doug@localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id uBNLG2Qw007717; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 16:16:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id uBNLG2Jv007714; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 16:16:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 16:16:02 -0500 (EST) From: doug@safeport.com X-X-Sender: doug@fledge.watson.org Reply-To: doug@fledge.watson.org To: byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca cc: Ernie Luzar , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IP address assignments to jails using ezjail In-Reply-To: <2390554002144fa9a925e1f8bed14466.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> Message-ID: References: <585C993B.7040805@gmail.com> <2390554002144fa9a925e1f8bed14466.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 23 Dec 2016 16:16:03 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 21:16:08 -0000 On Fri, 23 Dec 2016, James B. Byrne via freebsd-questions wrote: > > On Thu, December 22, 2016 22:25, Ernie Luzar wrote: > >> >> 3. Take ubound out of the mix by not starting that jail. Then use only >> ip addresses in your host to jail ssh command. >> >> 4. What is output of issuing host ssh command to a jail? Does host >> answer? >> > > Inbound ssh to the jail works: > > $ ssh -vv 192.168.216.196 > OpenSSH_5.3p1, OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013 > debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config > debug1: Applying options for * > debug2: ssh_connect: needpriv 0 > debug1: Connecting to 192.168.216.196 [192.168.216.196] port 22. > debug1: Connection established. > . . . > Password for user1@hlldrupal: > > > Outbound ssh from the jail does not: > > > # ssh -vv 192.168.216.22 > OpenSSH_7.2p2, OpenSSL 1.0.2j-freebsd 26 Sep 2016 > debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config > debug2: resolving "192.168.216.22" port 22 > debug2: ssh_connect_direct: needpriv 0 > debug1: Connecting to 192.168.216.22 [192.168.216.22] port 22. > debug1: connect to address 192.168.216.22 port 22: Operation timed out > ssh: connect to host 192.168.216.22 port 22: Operation timed out > > > There is no firewall running on either the jail or the jail host. Can you ssh from the host? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Dec 24 02:22:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6AB5C8DBA5 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 02:22:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x22f.google.com (mail-pf0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AA6CC9 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 02:22:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id c4so45942680pfb.1 for ; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 18:22:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qHh0xHB81LpaUs9gERKpXBJW7HcsQNK3L3N/YKE+urA=; b=aybh5+UTWfNe7599CR5OAQVZc85jC9A0xmGYgXveMZsNWHuy9WCBtNoTbhzX0m5dpw 4wsPFOvPB8CrOF4o9d0l85d+oMh5+Ti+ulsI/ZjDRvpEokl2r8gWp9TLOwWdIDfNO0ba dTzArZS+O9Rt3QzDoMl89fwjL2MZz79f10fTR8qExatJCa0P28SKIX3rf64K9eKjjH+6 9PUJvVFII8+r3GU7Cilpix1SsvkklFe4g5+EBpW76BgjUpYLwJIINmkR1Gk+jT98e+G+ GQPmFCtnfR5Gddo88ATHFOJhQaAwRlFWYpLhXiml05LTWvK1EVD7d5gP6WqdM3J+uddq /5jg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qHh0xHB81LpaUs9gERKpXBJW7HcsQNK3L3N/YKE+urA=; b=Iy0zxCMBdk2aX21f79VuXkHjccgP6minkYu0Q0sebuYbNwfYuvgjMmX1MTH5D1wqLu pDNupFNzyIWQV6z2W+tG7VUplOZOIrdXFgKr6ywgYPwqd9xM5yLPmvLCUgBuLt7xhkPx wZFjbt0zfDSBpdkPKPWJ6g0/G42I/GlwzCv1d0MLFgxiJEg3bifYO4fjuMcwOg9qPYNK pfAcERXbpFA99cof1JJw6JY7pfhPHJKNGO9gukZUJUD3fZF56NexW/XET5hH6jTCLr2p ma5+BjLoqBgAaAMgCQcq8ViJcZtkP7tbAZzxsjswgzjw6Iuz7nouRMnPSbNWHtNtNh8k x0Ew== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLadovLKxYp4kr6RVkcfd/SYHHX+afIOUT9FM3qxNnanWEhK5YiHGTcR+N0ZT4D6g== X-Received: by 10.84.206.37 with SMTP id f34mr35239524ple.35.1482546137853; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 18:22:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.103] ([120.29.76.197]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id y2sm64977867pff.82.2016.12.23.18.22.16 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 23 Dec 2016 18:22:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <585DDBD9.1070207@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 10:22:17 +0800 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IP address assignments to jails using ezjail References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 02:22:18 -0000 doug wrote: > On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, James B. Byrne via freebsd-questions wrote: > >> When I created the new jail I used this invocation: >> >> ezjail-admin create -x hlldrupal 'lo1|127.0.1.1,vtnet0|192.168.216.196' >> >> Inside the host rc.conf I have this: >> >> # Cloned i/f and assigned ipv4 addr for jails >> cloned_interfaces="lo1" # For shared jail configuration >> >> And ifconfig on the host shows this: >> >> vtnet0: flags=8943 >> metric 0 mtu 1500 >> options=80028 >> ether 00:a0:98:fa:aa:b6 >> inet 216.185.71.16 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 216.185.71.255 >> inet 192.168.216.16 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.216.255 >> inet 192.168.216.196 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.216.196 >> nd6 options=29 >> media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T >> status: active >> . . . >> lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 >> options=600003 >> inet 127.0.1.1 netmask 0xffffffff >> nd6 options=29 >> groups: lo >> >> Inside the jail ifconfig shows this: >> >> vtnet0: flags=8943 >> metric 0 mtu 1500 >> options=80028 >> ether 00:a0:98:fa:aa:b6 >> inet 192.168.216.196 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.216.196 >> media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T >> status: active >> lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 >> options=600003 >> groups: lo >> lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 >> options=600003 >> inet 127.0.1.1 netmask 0xffffffff >> groups: lo >> >> >> All this seems to be correct and yet I cannot seem to obtain an ssh >> connection to or from the jailed instance. ubound is running in the >> jail and seems to be working. At least host responds to queries. >> >> root@hlldrupal:~ # host sendmail.com >> sendmail.com has address 209.246.26.25 >> sendmail.com mail is handled by 10 mxa-00148501.gslb.pphosted.com. >> sendmail.com mail is handled by 20 mx2.proofpoint.com. >> sendmail.com mail is handled by 10 mxb-00148501.gslb.pphosted.com. >> >> pf is not running in the jail but sshd is: >> >> root@hlldrupal:~ # service sshd status >> sshd is running as pid 81502. >> >> root@hlldrupal:~ # service pf status >> Cannot 'status' pf. Set pf_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or use >> 'onestatus' instead of 'status'. >> root@hlldrupal:~ # service pf onestatus >> pf.ko is not loaded >> >> >> I note that the flag IFDISABLED is present on the host's lo1. Why? Is >> this the source of the connectivity problem with the jail? If so then >> why does the host commend work when executed within the jail? In any >> case I can ping the jail from without: >> >> [root@vhost04 ~ (master *%)]# ping 192.168.216.196 >> PING 192.168.216.196 (192.168.216.196) 56(84) bytes of data. >> 64 bytes from 192.168.216.196: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.647 ms >> >> I just cannot connect to that address via ssh from without nor can I >> connect ssh to any address from within the jail. >> >> > > The handbook suggests that getting loopback traffic is a good thing. > That said none of our production systems do this and a number of the > jails use sshguard via inetd. One of the original jail developers did > not have a handy answer as to why, or if, this is a must. That said, it > can't hurt. > > As to pinging, the answer provided by some very helpful people here, is > ping -S. This assumes /etc/sysctl.conf has > 'security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=1' and /usr/local/etc/ezjail/jail-name > has: > > export jail_`jail-name`_parameters="allow.raw_sockets=1" > > If you read the thread [anyone know what 'ping: sendto: Can't assign > requested" means'] it documents my rather painful acquisition of this > knowledge :) > In a jail by design default, ping is considered a security risk. jail(8) disables it by default unless the variable allow.raw_sockets is included in that jails definition statements. Using the sysctl method enables ping for all jails running on the host. This is ok for testing, but should be turned off for an production environment and should be mandatory disabled for any jail accessible from the public network. Read [man 8 jail] for details. I have not checked ezjail in the last 6 months which at that time it was still using the rc.conf method of jail definitions. At jail start you see a warning message to convert to jail.conf method. There has been talk that the rc.conf method will be removed in 11.1 release or very soon after. I would not assume that ezjail being in the handbook is am recommend way to go. Its just one of many jail command wrapper utilities. Like all ports things change and the updating of the handbook documentation is not the responsibility of the port maintainer so it becomes outdated and misleading. You are not the first person to fall into this hole. There has been talk about removing all port documentation from the handbook just for this reason. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Dec 24 03:36:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AE0C8CE3A for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 03:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce@ds.topemailsuper.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B85037F for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 03:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce@ds.topemailsuper.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9ABABC8CE39; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 03:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B48C8CE37 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 03:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce@ds.topemailsuper.com) Received: from mail.s062-207.ds.topemailsuper.com (mail.s062-207.ds.topemailsuper.com [217.61.81.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A80837E for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 03:36:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce@ds.topemailsuper.com) Received: from mail.s062-207.ds.topemailsuper.com (mail.s062-207.ds.topemailsuper.com [217.61.81.202]) by mail.s062-207.ds.topemailsuper.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D220D3C235C for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 03:35:31 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.s062-207.ds.topemailsuper.com D220D3C235C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=ds.topemailsuper.com; s=smtp; t=1482546931; bh=iNsvJJxJA8Lq7UeQoqKD39c3u/Wnyd39pzkDJC+IPbw=; h=Date:Subject:From:Reply-To:To:List-Unsubscribe; b=ySeHy684CXfkxF8UlH0R5efswAq/LEKfviBipBa4zWiAAXiKFQ2QJBELEgMM6ixVp 1yFuZD+1UEhXnT4KP6wubth4lY3m/+MZ2Ww3qP6Q8Iu3KLB/TOqg/JeYnEtBlDM0+C 4RnBavRO/lcu2BFEtL30zsoCy7rSgC5WnR1VI+nI= Message-ID: Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 03:35:31 +0100 Subject: =?UTF-8?B?VGkgYWNjb2dsaWFtbyBzdSBUb3BFbWFpbFN1cGVy?= From: TopEmailSuper Reply-To: news@ds.topemailsuper.com To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 03:36:09 -0000 973803 Buongiorno, siamo lieti di accoglierti all=E2=80=99interno di TopEmailSuper, la newslet= ter che fornisce a tutti gli iscritti l=E2=80=99opportunit=C3=A0 di acceder= e ogni giorno alle pi=C3=B9 valide offerte presenti online. Il nostro obiettivo quotidiano =C3=A8 aiutare coloro che si iscrivono sul n= ostro sito, comparando per loro le differenti offerte presenti sul web, cos= =C3=AC da consentirgli di accedere ai servizi e ai prodotti pi=C3=B9 conson= i per le loro specifiche necessit=C3=A0. Ti prospetteremo le nostre migliori offerte e quelle dei partner con cui co= llaboriamo, nel pieno riguardo delle norme inerenti la protezione dei tuoi = dati sensibili. Come Ringraziamentoper la sottoscrizione al nostro programma di consigli, v= i offriamo l'opportunit=C3=A0 di generare reddito aggiuntivo ogni mese....! Scopri come centinaia di migliaia di Italiani riescono a generare guadagni = extra rapidamente. Clicca qui!(http://ds.trackemail.it/trk.php?c=3DeyJpZENsaSI6IjI1ODUiLCJpZEN= hbXAiOjE2MjM2OTksImNvZCI6MTA0MTcwNTEyLCJjYXQiOiIiLCJjbnQiOiJJVEEiLCJlbWFpbC= I6InF1ZXN0aW9uc0BmcmVlYnNkLm9yZyIsImxpc3QiOiJsaXN0X05vbGVnZ2lvXzIifQ=3D=3D) Per consultare l=E2=80=99informativa inerente le norme di tutela della priv= acy, clicca QUI.(http://ds.trackemail.it/trk.php?c=3DeyJpZENsaSI6IjI1ODUiLC= JpZENhbXAiOjE2MjM2OTksImNvZCI6MTA0MTcwNTEzLCJjYXQiOiIiLCJjbnQiOiJJVEEiLCJsa= XN0IjoibGlzdF9Ob2xlZ2dpb18yIiwiZW1haWwiOiJxdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcifQ= =3D=3D) Qualora non desiderassi pi=C3=B9 ricevere in futuro la nostra newsletter, c= licca sul link presente al fondo di questa comunicazione. Ringraziandoti, ti porgiamo distinti saluti. Il team di TopEmailSuper Ricevi questa newsletter all'indirizzo questions@f= reebsd.org perch=C3=A9 hai dato il tuo consenso al trattamento dei dati per= sonali e a ricevere comunicazioni commerciali, avendo partecipato ad una in= iziativa organizzata o collegata a Top Email Super. Top Email Super garanti= sce la massima riservatezza sui tuoi dati personali ai sensi del Dlgs 196/0= 3 e si impegna a provvedere alla loro cancellazione o modifica qualora tu n= e faccia richiesta. Non rispondere direttamente al messaggio poiche' il tuo= messaggio non verra' letto. Se non vuoi pi=C3=B9 ricevere le newsletter co= mmerciali di Top Email Super clicca sul seguente link: http://ds.trackemai= l.it/fur.php?c=3D%7B%22idCli%22%3A%222585%22%2C%22idCamp%22%3A%221623699%22= %2C%22email%22%3A%22questions%40freebsd.org%22%2C%22seg%22%3A%22eqysi23knzz= wizrzhasfislboiydqrcomnkeu32vgv3hm6smiuzusma%3D%22%7D&url=3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fds= .trackemail.it%2Ftrk.php%3Fc%3DeyJpZENsaSI6IjI1ODUiLCJpZENhbXAiOiIxNjIzNjk5= IiwiY29kIjoxMTQ0MDkwOTgsImNhdCI6IiIsImVtYWlsIjoicXVlc3Rpb25zQGZyZWVic2Qub3J= nIiwiY250IjoiSVRBIiwibGlzdCI6Imxpc3RfTm9sZWdnaW9fMiJ9&at=3D1 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Dec 24 06:15:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0D7C8E30A for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 06:15:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [198.74.231.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA046A59 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 06:15:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [198.74.231.63]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3092F46F06; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 01:15:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (doug@localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id uBO6FZLI044625; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 01:15:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id uBO6FZA2044622; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 01:15:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: doug owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 01:15:35 -0500 (EST) From: doug@safeport.com X-X-Sender: doug@fledge.watson.org Reply-To: doug@fledge.watson.org To: Ernie Luzar cc: byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IP address assignments to jails using ezjail In-Reply-To: <585DDBD9.1070207@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <585DDBD9.1070207@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 24 Dec 2016 01:15:35 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 06:15:37 -0000 On Sat, 24 Dec 2016, Ernie Luzar wrote: > doug wrote: >> On Thu, 22 Dec 2016, James B. Byrne via freebsd-questions wrote: >> >>> When I created the new jail I used this invocation: >>> >>> ezjail-admin create -x hlldrupal 'lo1|127.0.1.1,vtnet0|192.168.216.196' >>> >>> Inside the host rc.conf I have this: >>> >>> # Cloned i/f and assigned ipv4 addr for jails >>> cloned_interfaces="lo1" # For shared jail configuration >>> >>> And ifconfig on the host shows this: >>> >>> vtnet0: flags=8943 >>> metric 0 mtu 1500 >>> options=80028 >>> ether 00:a0:98:fa:aa:b6 >>> inet 216.185.71.16 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 216.185.71.255 >>> inet 192.168.216.16 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.216.255 >>> inet 192.168.216.196 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.216.196 >>> nd6 options=29 >>> media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T >>> status: active >>> . . . >>> lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 >>> options=600003 >>> inet 127.0.1.1 netmask 0xffffffff >>> nd6 options=29 >>> groups: lo >>> >>> Inside the jail ifconfig shows this: >>> >>> vtnet0: flags=8943 >>> metric 0 mtu 1500 >>> options=80028 >>> ether 00:a0:98:fa:aa:b6 >>> inet 192.168.216.196 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.168.216.196 >>> media: Ethernet 10Gbase-T >>> status: active >>> lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 >>> options=600003 >>> groups: lo >>> lo1: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 >>> options=600003 >>> inet 127.0.1.1 netmask 0xffffffff >>> groups: lo >>> >>> >>> All this seems to be correct and yet I cannot seem to obtain an ssh >>> connection to or from the jailed instance. ubound is running in the >>> jail and seems to be working. At least host responds to queries. >>> >>> root@hlldrupal:~ # host sendmail.com >>> sendmail.com has address 209.246.26.25 >>> sendmail.com mail is handled by 10 mxa-00148501.gslb.pphosted.com. >>> sendmail.com mail is handled by 20 mx2.proofpoint.com. >>> sendmail.com mail is handled by 10 mxb-00148501.gslb.pphosted.com. >>> >>> pf is not running in the jail but sshd is: >>> >>> root@hlldrupal:~ # service sshd status >>> sshd is running as pid 81502. >>> >>> root@hlldrupal:~ # service pf status >>> Cannot 'status' pf. Set pf_enable to YES in /etc/rc.conf or use >>> 'onestatus' instead of 'status'. >>> root@hlldrupal:~ # service pf onestatus >>> pf.ko is not loaded >>> >>> >>> I note that the flag IFDISABLED is present on the host's lo1. Why? Is >>> this the source of the connectivity problem with the jail? If so then >>> why does the host commend work when executed within the jail? In any >>> case I can ping the jail from without: >>> >>> [root@vhost04 ~ (master *%)]# ping 192.168.216.196 >>> PING 192.168.216.196 (192.168.216.196) 56(84) bytes of data. >>> 64 bytes from 192.168.216.196: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.647 ms >>> >>> I just cannot connect to that address via ssh from without nor can I >>> connect ssh to any address from within the jail. >>> >>> >> >> The handbook suggests that getting loopback traffic is a good thing. That >> said none of our production systems do this and a number of the jails use >> sshguard via inetd. One of the original jail developers did not have a >> handy answer as to why, or if, this is a must. That said, it can't hurt. >> >> As to pinging, the answer provided by some very helpful people here, is >> ping -S. This assumes /etc/sysctl.conf has >> 'security.jail.allow_raw_sockets=1' and /usr/local/etc/ezjail/jail-name >> has: >> >> export jail_`jail-name`_parameters="allow.raw_sockets=1" >> >> If you read the thread [anyone know what 'ping: sendto: Can't assign >> requested" means'] it documents my rather painful acquisition of this >> knowledge :) >> > > > In a jail by design default, ping is considered a security risk. jail(8) > disables it by default unless the variable allow.raw_sockets is included in > that jails definition statements. Using the sysctl method enables ping for > all jails running on the host. This is ok for testing, but should be turned > off for an production environment and should be mandatory disabled for any > jail accessible from the public network. > Read [man 8 jail] for details. > > I have not checked ezjail in the last 6 months which at that time it was > still using the rc.conf method of jail definitions. At jail start you see a > warning message to convert to jail.conf method. There has been talk that the > rc.conf method will be removed in 11.1 release or very soon after. > > I would not assume that ezjail being in the handbook is am recommend way to > go. Its just one of many jail command wrapper utilities. Like all ports > things change and the updating of the handbook documentation is not the > responsibility of the port maintainer so it becomes outdated and misleading. > You are not the first person to fall into this hole. There has been talk > about removing all port documentation from the handbook just for this reason. I only gave the ezjail setup because what was what was being used in the question. It should be pretty clear that whatever shell script is being to to help with jail management will have no impact on the interactions of the jail userland with the host kernel. The question was (as I understood it), ping ain't working. The answer to that seems to be 'ping -S' at least for some versions of FreeBSD. That was new info to me. The ssh portion of the problem is very different. If the host can ssh and the jail can not, that yet another problem that is likewise not related to jail management scripts. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Dec 24 11:59:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AC38C8E401 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 11:59:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from armenz78@deane.co.uk) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5F2E71 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 11:59:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from armenz78@deane.co.uk) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EACD7C8E400; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 11:59:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA819C8E3FE for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 11:59:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from armenz78@deane.co.uk) Received: from mta15.deane.co.uk (mta15.deane.co.uk [81.144.222.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58FFE6D for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 11:59:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from armenz78@deane.co.uk) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=deane.co.uk; h=Message-ID:From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; i=armenz78@deane.co.uk; bh=Zu9wY6r43cJkhntHWrGBGcTuME8=; b=J7QHfSOE+KLmRaJza8ysCsc+ilzLqLMMzSb/fkAW7+zgewofo9rWhMuDfvXZza5hy8PPnLGnUV2z 8v6ojeB9OB6hOHseQeC7Al3oeCeFOinZ87SbGc3tt7SMuuDIM1EHeIAhMqfTHIao2lVV6VkC4s5t AlJYwCN4o45njgfOEHg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=deane.co.uk; b=gsY2xB4yVMbB6dS5jgFZQvhI/GDT/dU9mcLiHWom2YBYWPiuz6D4ZC4v8wOnh34tfAa9IwZcqTNB IvswgygjBxj6rsSZpk4yi2n+288KxjWSFF9I01WgaSpHE+uUYTGRWuGlEQ5C8fTBDxzK9u28zon+ LjKUe18Ev2ePHx+dfQI=; Received: by mta15.deane.co.uk id hbphhk0001g6 for ; Sat, 24 Dec 2016 11:59:16 +0000 (envelope-from ) Message-ID: From: "John" To: Subject: Tired of being alone? We're here to help you!tm Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 12:59:18 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-9"; Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 11:59:24 -0000 Howdy, naughty guy! I've only found your nmbr by accident & I would love = to meet ya. I am very bored today and I wanted 2 find some1 to have good = time with. I'm a magnificent rogue dat wants 2 txt you sum hot pictures o= f me. Just call this No or email me a message and I will show U everythin= g. Do you want 2 C my large jugs & pretty ass? I have lots of pix of my d= elicious body and I rly want ya to C them first. Don't w8 2 long ;) xxx h= ttp://shafigullin.com