From owner-freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Mon Mar 27 06:27:50 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892C6D1F53B for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 06:27:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (relay6-d.mail.gandi.net [IPv6:2001:4b98:c:538::198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52EE318CE for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 06:27:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from mfilter27-d.gandi.net (mfilter27-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.155]) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D233FB8A0; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 08:27:48 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter27-d.gandi.net Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.198]) by mfilter27-d.gandi.net (mfilter27-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pe0kDv1oVS5w; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 08:27:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Originating-IP: 210.164.9.12 Received: from [192.168.64.1] (unknown [210.164.9.12]) (Authenticated sender: gnn@neville-neil.com) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 792AAFB8B1; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 08:27:45 +0200 (CEST) From: "George Neville-Neil" To: "Miroslav Lachman" <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: "Slawa Olhovchenkov" , "freebsd-performance@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Network performance comparison of DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD and Linux Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 15:27:40 +0900 Message-ID: <7B8DED16-F794-495D-AAE4-61CC386A962E@neville-neil.com> In-Reply-To: <58BE799B.6080002@quip.cz> References: <58BE0984.4070208@quip.cz> <20170307071018.GP15630@zxy.spb.ru> <58BE799B.6080002@quip.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.6r5347) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 11:51:09 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 06:27:50 -0000 On 7 Mar 2017, at 18:12, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote on 2017/03/07 08:10: >> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 02:14:44AM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >> >>> There is some comparison of DragonflyBSD, FreeBSD and two versions >>> of >>> Linux in specific network benchmark - HTTP/1.1 short lived >>> connections. >>> FreeBSD is the worst in this test. >>> >>> https://www.dragonflydigest.com/2017/03/06/19425.html >>> >>> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/1K.png >>> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/8K.png >>> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perfcomp/16K.png >>> >>> https://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~sephe/perf_cmp.pdf >> >> Is this you test? > > No, it is not mine test. I just found it on the internet. > The work was presented at the latest AsiaBSDCon and several of us are working the sephe@, who is a FreeBSD committer on improving the benchmark's fidelity as well as addressing the issues that are highlighted. Look for P05C: 10 Years with DragonFlyBSD network stack https://2017.asiabsdcon.org/program.html.en# Best, George