From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Sep 3 02:03:53 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 360FDE11AC2; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 02:03:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmd@freebsd.org) Received: from www.poelloepaeae.de (v22017034403546374.happysrv.de [188.68.38.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 002AF7D079; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 02:03:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmd@freebsd.org) Received: from manray.ogolem.org (c-73-195-214-55.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [73.195.214.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.poelloepaeae.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1649818811B; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 04:03:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 22:02:57 -0400 From: Johannes M Dieterich To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: [RFC] future of drm1 in base Message-ID: <20170902220257.6667280e@manray.ogolem.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 02:03:53 -0000 Dear current/x11, please CC me on responses. I am writing you on behalf of the FreeBSDDesktop team concerning the future of drm1 in base. drm1 in base supports the following GPUs: * 3dfx Banshee/Voodoo3+ (tdfx) * ATI Rage 128 (r128) * ATI Rage Pro (mach64) * Matrox G200/G400 (mga) * Savage3D/MX/IX, Savage4, SuperSavage, Twister, ProSavage[DDR] (savage) * SIS 300/630/540 and XGI V3XE/V5/V8 (sis) * VIA Unichrome / Pro (via) Since their original introduction up to 2010 these drivers have mostly been maintained as part of larger cleanups. The newest hardware drm1 supports dates from 2004, if I am not mistaken, and most of the hardware is AGP-based. With the introduction of graphics/drm-next-kmod which brings its own drm.ko following the Linux notation, we are facing collisions between these old drivers' drm.ko and the newer one. We would like to hear if anybody still runs CURRENT on machines housing the above GPUs and relies on drm1. If there are still a significant number of people running CURRENT on this hardware in production, we would be willing to make a graphics/drm-legacy-kmod port. Thanks, the FreeBSDDesktop team From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Sep 3 05:31:29 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32B7E1BEFF; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 05:31:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@komquats.com) Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca (smtp-out-no.shaw.ca [64.59.134.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B540B8318B; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 05:31:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@komquats.com) Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([96.50.22.10]) by shaw.ca with SMTP id oNVEdmAbaM9gtoNVFdU9Mj; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 23:31:26 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=a+JAzQaF c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=jvE2nwUzI0ECrNeyr98KWA==:117 a=jvE2nwUzI0ECrNeyr98KWA==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=2JCJgTwv5E4A:10 a=aJEGARJCAAAA:8 a=YxBL1-UpAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=hD4YFKEdfaGV2w1d5Q4A:9 a=YCkxdLnJGCefvND9:21 a=bWC31ir8Lyx8WDP3:21 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=69xMm2rMUJ9FuF5TBKAH:22 a=Ia-lj3WSrqcvXOmTRaiG:22 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22BBA1194; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 22:31:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slippy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v835VNEt023765; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 22:31:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com) Message-Id: <201709030531.v835VNEt023765@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6 Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.cschubert.com/ To: Johannes M Dieterich cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] future of drm1 in base In-Reply-To: Message from Johannes M Dieterich of "Sat, 02 Sep 2017 22:02:57 -0400." <20170902220257.6667280e@manray.ogolem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 22:31:23 -0700 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfNELgRgbWAzitOM/ygoj3CitBQb9a+ePwQStIXRizhyU/Lhtrb95HCPTEWvT3DOERnwMUjjXaKWBHZ0Dd306/ov6yelqvCKReNOW2eachikjB6nvQqvs NrbsGJIMUjRGv2eqEuSilHmZE9stX8EHShfSuctNyJLTAptlhzKQsfjY21kXj7AgNfC9iMkJDArnjKm2m9uX+Z3KU921aOewj8M+RGOAe87dHFWXcb+H8tuY g87Aam3zyHMMEGeeIp4WWA== X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 05:31:29 -0000 In message <20170902220257.6667280e@manray.ogolem.org>, Johannes M Dieterich wr ites: > Dear current/x11, > > please CC me on responses. > > I am writing you on behalf of the FreeBSDDesktop team concerning the > future of drm1 in base. > > drm1 in base supports the following GPUs: > * 3dfx Banshee/Voodoo3+ (tdfx) > * ATI Rage 128 (r128) > * ATI Rage Pro (mach64) > * Matrox G200/G400 (mga) > * Savage3D/MX/IX, Savage4, SuperSavage, Twister, ProSavage[DDR] (savage) > * SIS 300/630/540 and XGI V3XE/V5/V8 (sis) > * VIA Unichrome / Pro (via) > > Since their original introduction up to 2010 these drivers have mostly > been maintained as part of larger cleanups. The newest hardware drm1 > supports dates from 2004, if I am not mistaken, and most of the > hardware is AGP-based. > > With the introduction of graphics/drm-next-kmod which brings its own > drm.ko following the Linux notation, we are facing collisions between > these old drivers' drm.ko and the newer one. > > We would like to hear if anybody still runs CURRENT on machines housing > the above GPUs and relies on drm1. > > If there are still a significant number of people running CURRENT on > this hardware in production, we would be willing to make a > graphics/drm-legacy-kmod port. Thanks for the heads up Johannes. I currently have three machines that each run ATI r128, mach64 and the last one an mga card. I normally use my i945 and i915 laptops (mostly the former) but on occasion I may fire up X on one of the other three. Having a drm-legacy port in the tree would benefit to me. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Sep 3 10:02:16 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CF8E033F5; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 10:02:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Received: from theravensnest.org (xvm-110-62.dc2.ghst.net [46.226.110.62]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "theravensnest.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DEC265C97; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 10:02:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.65] (host86-138-54-151.range86-138.btcentralplus.com [86.138.54.151]) (authenticated bits=0) by theravensnest.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v83A2A1Q057278 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 3 Sep 2017 10:02:11 GMT (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: d60e724c-75b0-4b63-9702-f4a9d2bf6793: Host host86-138-54-151.range86-138.btcentralplus.com [86.138.54.151] claimed to be [192.168.1.65] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: [RFC] future of drm1 in base From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: <201709030531.v835VNEt023765@slippy.cwsent.com> Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2017 11:02:07 +0100 Cc: Johannes M Dieterich , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <288500A4-AF22-465D-AAE7-794BEED3A5E5@FreeBSD.org> References: <201709030531.v835VNEt023765@slippy.cwsent.com> To: Cy Schubert X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 10:02:16 -0000 On 3 Sep 2017, at 06:31, Cy Schubert wrote: >=20 > Thanks for the heads up Johannes. I currently have three machines that = each=20 > run ATI r128, mach64 and the last one an mga card. I normally use my = i945=20 > and i915 laptops (mostly the former) but on occasion I may fire up X = on one=20 > of the other three. Having a drm-legacy port in the tree would benefit = to=20 > me. It=E2=80=99s been quite a while since I used any of these (though much = of the list is very familiar), but the last machine I ran with a mach64 = card was faster with the vesa driver than with the =E2=80=98accelerated=E2= =80=99 driver (as I recall, it was a 500MHz Pentium III). I suspect the = real question is not whether people have machines that use these cards, = but whether they do anything with them where they=E2=80=99d notice the = lack of acceleration. David From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Sep 3 10:28:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5330DE04299; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 10:28:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gurenchan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x22c.google.com (mail-vk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05948666B6; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 10:28:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gurenchan@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id q189so8970477vke.4; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 03:28:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6TStfYTNtyXqrabEpHMG4dOT88yHKwdvnlv1uIMu91M=; b=HYOCcnbIR/a2qHSSYHXHYUbkJr4HgYLHpyBiTJd8p/s1nMdKyRYnhri6/xH4Ujhkjw IVAcGfcR9CzKMnl6xM3rveeTudKKBHfl0REhxe9hl484HiCmqkbbchgbo7XwTquXMU9Q +DGKCAANdmTWqONdi+JHHR7vu6nRNvgcpoigimPnRVYON8FvbakhuXDTQIeZhopjggIF rVKDn/Fdh9v/sZK5ySaV4Znh+w7iB1sj+jnReKLEY2ArqN8dpYvtQdZI8YNrAxSkoeD+ Fs1rDTJImy9fOFNbSfi2Vu9e694WL/dUoiSwn6zyyzNrgUP/HDERgGVVdPDZwsEGuI3B wuZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6TStfYTNtyXqrabEpHMG4dOT88yHKwdvnlv1uIMu91M=; b=SKiV6vEcYaAp3Ux6NgNvq+j7BfoUyHR/7sabHv0esnegp3iKL5EkckNOH5UHdYStOg /CvqAUtdAQ81JCvPLZPJK29KsEkSf8+dMygzCMCpw7XB67jtSGvCrqpLE4NAS7Dt56BH JJzn3qjOEouz947se0aOOmCTbhTPvAFg3/jShaL9mD4jd02P1S28XaJWSHb1IcZwx//j sWqW2hjETE7zWSw9F0yecgWSvOSc4//HCUdxeH5Gg/uS/dj3WcLnYl5krLDQK21Slmqv elElxciJZ+RKaE1zdB9O1Q3SfdzQFGzJjCVjv1zguQh1gyGGVUmAYooKsd9G8FrR24xY bGhA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjl17KOYZ/2uJgRAEvjPhEsGgYgtk5hIfPbcMxySsmFsjvBvzro kTriCfAOZHvpJVbKb8s2sqzXbX3uLw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb4tREqurrdkwuOCEWnAC/Qm/KmyDcFKfoxZYhriy3NxhXoseqGGPT36Ho6ElBN4hBI+tcqNs8O9cuXJZx4hRho= X-Received: by 10.31.192.133 with SMTP id q127mr4456830vkf.20.1504434489721; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 03:28:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201709030531.v835VNEt023765@slippy.cwsent.com> <288500A4-AF22-465D-AAE7-794BEED3A5E5@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <288500A4-AF22-465D-AAE7-794BEED3A5E5@FreeBSD.org> From: blubee blubeeme Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 10:27:58 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC] future of drm1 in base To: David Chisnall , Cy Schubert Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, Johannes M Dieterich , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 10:28:11 -0000 I also have a current machine with one of those listed gpu. A friend got hacked on windows, I got them setup with a ryzen chip and no integrated GPU. Finding a supported gpu was a challenge but, those old drivers allow the machine to have display. Please try to maintain the older drivers, thanks. Best, Owen On Sun, Sep 3, 2017, 18:03 David Chisnall wrote: > On 3 Sep 2017, at 06:31, Cy Schubert wrote: > > > > Thanks for the heads up Johannes. I currently have three machines that > each > > run ATI r128, mach64 and the last one an mga card. I normally use my i9= 45 > > and i915 laptops (mostly the former) but on occasion I may fire up X on > one > > of the other three. Having a drm-legacy port in the tree would benefit = to > > me. > > It=E2=80=99s been quite a while since I used any of these (though much of= the list > is very familiar), but the last machine I ran with a mach64 card was fast= er > with the vesa driver than with the =E2=80=98accelerated=E2=80=99 driver (= as I recall, it > was a 500MHz Pentium III). I suspect the real question is not whether > people have machines that use these cards, but whether they do anything > with them where they=E2=80=99d notice the lack of acceleration. > > David > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Sep 3 14:49:03 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D14B3E0EE70; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 14:49:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 903286DEB1; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 14:49:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1doVj1-000Fzk-G0; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 17:18:11 +0300 Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2017 17:18:11 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Johannes M Dieterich Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] future of drm1 in base Message-ID: <20170903141811.GB9110@zxy.spb.ru> References: <20170902220257.6667280e@manray.ogolem.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170902220257.6667280e@manray.ogolem.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 14:49:03 -0000 On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 10:02:57PM -0400, Johannes M Dieterich wrote: > Dear current/x11, > > please CC me on responses. > > I am writing you on behalf of the FreeBSDDesktop team concerning the > future of drm1 in base. > > drm1 in base supports the following GPUs: > * 3dfx Banshee/Voodoo3+ (tdfx) > * ATI Rage 128 (r128) > * ATI Rage Pro (mach64) > * Matrox G200/G400 (mga) > * Savage3D/MX/IX, Savage4, SuperSavage, Twister, ProSavage[DDR] (savage) > * SIS 300/630/540 and XGI V3XE/V5/V8 (sis) > * VIA Unichrome / Pro (via) > > Since their original introduction up to 2010 these drivers have mostly > been maintained as part of larger cleanups. The newest hardware drm1 > supports dates from 2004, if I am not mistaken, and most of the > hardware is AGP-based. Some of this hardware is part of more modern servers platforms (ex: http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon/C600/X9DRT-F.cfm) > With the introduction of graphics/drm-next-kmod which brings its own > drm.ko following the Linux notation, we are facing collisions between > these old drivers' drm.ko and the newer one. > > We would like to hear if anybody still runs CURRENT on machines housing > the above GPUs and relies on drm1. > > If there are still a significant number of people running CURRENT on > this hardware in production, we would be willing to make a > graphics/drm-legacy-kmod port. > > Thanks, > > the FreeBSDDesktop team > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Sep 3 16:49:43 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD9FE1421B for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 16:49:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@nomadlogic.org) Received: from vps-mail.nomadlogic.org (unknown [IPv6:2607:f2f8:a098::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36B8F7175E for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 16:49:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@nomadlogic.org) Received: from [192.168.1.208] (cpe-23-242-94-236.socal.res.rr.com [23.242.94.236]) by vps-mail.nomadlogic.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c1fe7614 TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 09:49:42 -0700 (PDT) To: "freebsd-x11@freebsd.org" From: Pete Wright Subject: Synaptics Issues Message-ID: <393ee3b1-14c1-3a74-21c7-ef2557aa448c@nomadlogic.org> Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2017 09:49:40 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 16:49:43 -0000 Hi there, I have a laptop from System76 that has a synaptics touchpad.  I was wondering how synaptics has been working on other platforms. I'm running into issues with my touchpad which require me to either restart or disable the device altogether.  I'm running CURRENT/drm-next - but suspect this may happen on other releases as well. symptoms: - boot system without enabling synaptics via loader.conf.  moused detects psm device, xorg picks up device and treats it as a sysmouse.  not advanced features work (palm detection for example) - but mouse mostly works.  periodically the mouse will start jumping randomly on display and i'll have to disable the mouse device and/or restart computer to regain full control. - boot system enabling synaptics via loader.conf.  xorg detects mouse and loads the synaptics xorg driver.  advanced features mostly work - but after a short amount of time (several hours) mouse becomes much more erratic than scenario above.  a system restart is required to regain control of mouse. i've done a bunch of testing of passing synaptic Xorg params that I got from a working ubuntu install, but that has not helped.  i'm kind of at a loss at this point though, is the issue with Xorg or with FreeBSD's synaptics kernel implementation?  any pointers for debugging would be really appreciated! -pete -- Pete Wright pete@nomadlogic.org @nomadlogicLA From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Sep 3 16:51:13 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BFFE142F8; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 16:51:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@komquats.com) Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca (smtp-out-no.shaw.ca [64.59.134.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 564F17190A; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 16:51:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@komquats.com) Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([96.50.22.10]) by shaw.ca with SMTP id oY6ydnzrdM9gtoY6zdUysN; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 10:51:06 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=a+JAzQaF c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=jvE2nwUzI0ECrNeyr98KWA==:117 a=jvE2nwUzI0ECrNeyr98KWA==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=2JCJgTwv5E4A:10 a=YxBL1-UpAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=BWvPGDcYAAAA:8 a=NEHEcJ74qUXLnIKBCx0A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=Ia-lj3WSrqcvXOmTRaiG:22 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 a=pxhY87DP9d2VeQe4joPk:22 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FB5C1742; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 09:51:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slippy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v83Gp3He026291; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 09:51:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com) Message-Id: <201709031651.v83Gp3He026291@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6 Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.cschubert.com/ To: blubee blubeeme cc: David Chisnall , Cy Schubert , freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, Johannes M Dieterich , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] future of drm1 in base In-Reply-To: Message from blubee blubeeme of "Sun, 03 Sep 2017 10:27:58 -0000." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 09:51:03 -0700 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfGPeba3LhtkOZKCoFtWlnC2USMORDJoe/l1tlJpsW80qj3LI2hvHgHYQ6y4UqyekMwzXc46Yse2rSbu27KIN6z7grWjBSAgqRjSafYumSMr5vnI6+W8c ZimNEJne70Cl7K/1LgSG/IYhIIGMglr2WOtOCX9BFJr1PUDvVAsfmQhacZanYIWfv0lkTNHZUU9jPh5vxE2e+IZCkyD8c9Ux7Xs+rSWsafjL0lr20d+3RDpb HXVxIZSmzE2M3UJIiSDWpCwdMbs0WYzW7hdIyS5rnxSThvV9tpA8k6OVDnYCMG5hsYLYWJo2UZ8OqUxfJXCWvA== X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 16:51:13 -0000 (Replying inline) In message , blubee blubeeme writes: > I also have a current machine with one of those listed gpu. > > A friend got hacked on windows, I got them setup with a ryzen chip and no > integrated GPU. Finding a supported gpu was a challenge but, those old > drivers allow the machine to have display. > > Please try to maintain the older drivers, thanks. > > Best, > Owen I wouldn't mind taking care of and feeding the new port if it's created. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. > > On Sun, Sep 3, 2017, 18:03 David Chisnall wrote: > > > On 3 Sep 2017, at 06:31, Cy Schubert wrote: > > > > > > Thanks for the heads up Johannes. I currently have three machines that > > each > > > run ATI r128, mach64 and the last one an mga card. I normally use my i9= > 45 > > > and i915 laptops (mostly the former) but on occasion I may fire up X on > > one > > > of the other three. Having a drm-legacy port in the tree would benefit = > to > > > me. > > > > It=E2=80=99s been quite a while since I used any of these (though much of= > the list > > is very familiar), but the last machine I ran with a mach64 card was fast= > er > > with the vesa driver than with the =E2=80=98accelerated=E2=80=99 driver (= > as I recall, it > > was a 500MHz Pentium III). I suspect the real question is not whether > > people have machines that use these cards, but whether they do anything > > with them where they=E2=80=99d notice the lack of acceleration. > > > > David > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Sep 3 17:16:44 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D11E15621 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 17:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAED0723F1 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 17:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B7263E1561B; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 17:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AFDE15619 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 17:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96284723F0 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 17:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v83HGiYh046859 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 17:16:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 222031] x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati: No accelerated rendering Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 17:16:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Type: request X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 17:16:44 -0000 Alexander Klein has reassi= gned Bugzilla Automation 's request for maintainer-feedbac= k to x11@FreeBSD.org: Bug 222031: x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati: No accelerated rendering https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222031 --- Description --- I have a fresh install of 11.0/amd64 on a Fujitsu FUTRO S550-2, and for one reason or another, accelerated rendering does not work. The system is the following: % uname -a FreeBSD Fujitsu-TCL 11.0-RELEASE-p12 FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p12 #0: Wed Aug 9 10:03:39 UTC 2017=20=20=20=20 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 I load the drivers in loader.conf, but this does not seem to be related to = the problem, as removing the relevant lines does nothing to remedy the problem: % cat loader.conf=20 loader_logo=3D"beastie" if_urtwn_load=3D"YES" linux_load=3D"YES" radeonkmsfw_RS690_cp_load=3D"YES" radeonkms_load=3D"YES" Here are the relevant messages from /var/log/messages, note the "*ERROR* radeon: ring test failed"-message: Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: vgapci0: port 0x9000-0x90ff mem 0xf0000000-0xf7ffffff,0xf8200000-0xf820ffff,0xf8100000-0xf81fffff irq 18 a t device 5.0 on pci1 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: drmn0: on vgapci0 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] RADEON_IS_PCI Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] initializing kernel modeset= ting (RS690 0x1002:0x791F 0x1734:0x111D). Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] register mmio base: 0xF8200= 000 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] register mmio size: 65536 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon_atrm_get_bios: =3D= =3D=3D> Try ATRM... Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon_atrm_get_bios: IGP c= ard detected, skipping this method... Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon_acpi_vfct_bios: =3D= =3D=3D> Try VFCT... Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon_acpi_vfct_bios: Get "VFCT" ACPI table Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon_acpi_vfct_bios: Fail= ed to get "VFCT" table: AE_NOT_FOUND Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] igp_read_bios_from_vram: = =3D=3D=3D> Try IGP's VRAM... Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] igp_read_bios_from_vram: VR= AM base address: 0xf0000000 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] igp_read_bios_from_vram: Map address: 0xfffff800f0000000 (262144 bytes) Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] igp_read_bios_from_vram: Incorrect BIOS signature: 0x0000 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon_read_bios: =3D=3D=3D= > Try PCI Expansion ROM... Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon_read_bios: Map addre= ss: 0xfffff800000c0000 (131072 bytes) Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] ATOM BIOS: FSC Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: drmn0: info: VRAM: 128M 0x0000000038000= 000 - 0x000000003FFFFFFF (128M used) Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: drmn0: info: GTT: 512M 0x00000000400000= 00 - 0x000000005FFFFFFF Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 1 (10.10.2010). Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Driver supports precise vbl= ank timestamp query. Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] MSI enabled 1 message(s) Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: drmn0: info: radeon: using MSI. Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon: irq initialized. Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Detected VRAM RAM=3D128M, BAR=3D128M Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] RAM width 128bits DDR Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: [TTM] Zone kernel: Available graphics memory: 439956 kiB Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: [TTM] Initializing pool allocator Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon: 128M of VRAM memory ready Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon: 512M of GTT memory ready. Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] GART: num cpu pages 131072,= num gpu pages 131072 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon: 1 quad pipes, 1 z p= ipes initialized. Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] PCIE GART of 512M enabled (table at 0x000000000365B000). Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: drmn0: info: WB enabled Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: drmn0: info: fence driver on ring 0 use= gpu addr 0x0000000040000000 and cpu addr 0x0xfffff8000254b000 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Loading RS690/RS740 Microco= de Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon: ring at 0x0000000040001000 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: error: [drm:pid0:r100_ring_test] *ERROR* radeon: ring test failed (scratch(0x15E4)=3D0xCAFEDEAD) Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: error: [drm:pid0:r100_cp_init] *ERROR* radeon: cp isn't working (-22). Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: drmn0: error: failed initializing CP (-= 22). Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: drmn0: error: Disabling GPU acceleration Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: error: [drm:pid0:r100_cp_fini] *ERROR* = Wait for CP idle timeout, shutting down CP. Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: error: [drm:pid0:r100_cp_disable] *ERRO= R* Failed to wait GUI idle while programming pipes. Bad things might happen. Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon: cp finalized Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon_device_init: Taking = over the fictitious range 0xf0000000-0xf8000000 [...] Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Radeon Display Connectors Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Connector 0: Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] DVI-I-1 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] HPD2 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] DDC: 0x7e40 0x7e60 0x7e44 0x7e64 0x7e48 0x7e68 0x7e4c 0x7e6c Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Encoders: Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] CRT1: INTERNAL_KLDSCP_D= AC1 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] DFP2: INTERNAL_DDI Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Connector 1: Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] HDMI-A-1 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] DDC: 0x7e40 0x7e50 0x7e44 0x7e54 0x7e48 0x7e58 0x7e4c 0x7e5c Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Encoders: Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] DFP3: INTERNAL_LVTM1 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Connector DVI-I-1: get mode from tunables: Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] - kern.vt.fb.modes.DVI-I-1 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] - kern.vt.fb.default_mode Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Connector HDMI-A-1: get mode from tunables: Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] - kern.vt.fb.modes.HDMI-A= -1 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] - kern.vt.fb.default_mode Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] fb mappable at 0xF0040000 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] vram apper at 0xF0000000 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] size 5242880 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] fb depth is 24 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] pitch is 5120 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: fbd0 on drmn0 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: VT: Replacing driver "vga" with new "fb= ". Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Initialized radeon 2.29.0 20080528 for drmn0 on minor 0 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: vgapci0: Boot video device I found an old problem reported for SUSE with very similar symptoms, which = may or may not be related to this problem: https://forums.opensuse.org/showthread.php/450218-openSUSE-11-3-RS690-*ERRO= R*-r adeon-ring-test-failed From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Sep 3 17:16:44 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F003DE15623 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 17:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D44C1723F3 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 17:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D084FE15620; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 17:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0189E1561F for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 17:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEB95723F2 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 17:16:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v83HGiYj046859 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 17:16:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 222031] x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati: No accelerated rendering Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 17:16:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: alexander.klein@physiologie.med.uni-giessen.de X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter flagtypes.name Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 17:16:45 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222031 Bug ID: 222031 Summary: x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati: No accelerated rendering Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: amd64 OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: x11@FreeBSD.org Reporter: alexander.klein@physiologie.med.uni-giessen.de Flags: maintainer-feedback?(x11@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: x11@FreeBSD.org I have a fresh install of 11.0/amd64 on a Fujitsu FUTRO S550-2, and for one reason or another, accelerated rendering does not work. The system is the following: % uname -a FreeBSD Fujitsu-TCL 11.0-RELEASE-p12 FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE-p12 #0: Wed Aug 9 10:03:39 UTC 2017=20=20=20=20 root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 I load the drivers in loader.conf, but this does not seem to be related to = the problem, as removing the relevant lines does nothing to remedy the problem: % cat loader.conf=20 loader_logo=3D"beastie" if_urtwn_load=3D"YES" linux_load=3D"YES" radeonkmsfw_RS690_cp_load=3D"YES" radeonkms_load=3D"YES" Here are the relevant messages from /var/log/messages, note the "*ERROR* radeon: ring test failed"-message: Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: vgapci0: port 0x9000-0x90ff mem 0xf0000000-0xf7ffffff,0xf8200000-0xf820ffff,0xf8100000-0xf81fffff irq 18 a t device 5.0 on pci1 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: drmn0: on vgapci0 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] RADEON_IS_PCI Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] initializing kernel modeset= ting (RS690 0x1002:0x791F 0x1734:0x111D). Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] register mmio base: 0xF8200= 000 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] register mmio size: 65536 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon_atrm_get_bios: =3D= =3D=3D> Try ATRM... Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon_atrm_get_bios: IGP c= ard detected, skipping this method... Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon_acpi_vfct_bios: =3D= =3D=3D> Try VFCT... Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon_acpi_vfct_bios: Get "VFCT" ACPI table Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon_acpi_vfct_bios: Fail= ed to get "VFCT" table: AE_NOT_FOUND Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] igp_read_bios_from_vram: = =3D=3D=3D> Try IGP's VRAM... Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] igp_read_bios_from_vram: VR= AM base address: 0xf0000000 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] igp_read_bios_from_vram: Map address: 0xfffff800f0000000 (262144 bytes) Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] igp_read_bios_from_vram: Incorrect BIOS signature: 0x0000 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon_read_bios: =3D=3D=3D= > Try PCI Expansion ROM... Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon_read_bios: Map addre= ss: 0xfffff800000c0000 (131072 bytes) Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] ATOM BIOS: FSC Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: drmn0: info: VRAM: 128M 0x0000000038000= 000 - 0x000000003FFFFFFF (128M used) Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: drmn0: info: GTT: 512M 0x00000000400000= 00 - 0x000000005FFFFFFF Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Supports vblank timestamp caching Rev 1 (10.10.2010). Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Driver supports precise vbl= ank timestamp query. Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] MSI enabled 1 message(s) Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: drmn0: info: radeon: using MSI. Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon: irq initialized. Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Detected VRAM RAM=3D128M, BAR=3D128M Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] RAM width 128bits DDR Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: [TTM] Zone kernel: Available graphics memory: 439956 kiB Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: [TTM] Initializing pool allocator Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon: 128M of VRAM memory ready Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon: 512M of GTT memory ready. Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] GART: num cpu pages 131072,= num gpu pages 131072 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon: 1 quad pipes, 1 z p= ipes initialized. Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] PCIE GART of 512M enabled (table at 0x000000000365B000). Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: drmn0: info: WB enabled Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: drmn0: info: fence driver on ring 0 use= gpu addr 0x0000000040000000 and cpu addr 0x0xfffff8000254b000 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Loading RS690/RS740 Microco= de Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon: ring at 0x0000000040001000 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: error: [drm:pid0:r100_ring_test] *ERROR* radeon: ring test failed (scratch(0x15E4)=3D0xCAFEDEAD) Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: error: [drm:pid0:r100_cp_init] *ERROR* radeon: cp isn't working (-22). Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: drmn0: error: failed initializing CP (-= 22). Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: drmn0: error: Disabling GPU acceleration Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: error: [drm:pid0:r100_cp_fini] *ERROR* = Wait for CP idle timeout, shutting down CP. Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: error: [drm:pid0:r100_cp_disable] *ERRO= R* Failed to wait GUI idle while programming pipes. Bad things might happen. Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon: cp finalized Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] radeon_device_init: Taking = over the fictitious range 0xf0000000-0xf8000000 [...] Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Radeon Display Connectors Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Connector 0: Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] DVI-I-1 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] HPD2 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] DDC: 0x7e40 0x7e60 0x7e44 0x7e64 0x7e48 0x7e68 0x7e4c 0x7e6c Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Encoders: Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] CRT1: INTERNAL_KLDSCP_D= AC1 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] DFP2: INTERNAL_DDI Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Connector 1: Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] HDMI-A-1 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] DDC: 0x7e40 0x7e50 0x7e44 0x7e54 0x7e48 0x7e58 0x7e4c 0x7e5c Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Encoders: Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] DFP3: INTERNAL_LVTM1 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Connector DVI-I-1: get mode from tunables: Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] - kern.vt.fb.modes.DVI-I-1 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] - kern.vt.fb.default_mode Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Connector HDMI-A-1: get mode from tunables: Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] - kern.vt.fb.modes.HDMI-A= -1 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] - kern.vt.fb.default_mode Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] fb mappable at 0xF0040000 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] vram apper at 0xF0000000 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] size 5242880 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] fb depth is 24 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] pitch is 5120 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: fbd0 on drmn0 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: VT: Replacing driver "vga" with new "fb= ". Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: info: [drm] Initialized radeon 2.29.0 20080528 for drmn0 on minor 0 Sep 3 18:24:48 Fujitsu-TCL kernel: vgapci0: Boot video device I found an old problem reported for SUSE with very similar symptoms, which = may or may not be related to this problem: https://forums.opensuse.org/showthread.php/450218-openSUSE-11-3-RS690-*ERRO= R*-radeon-ring-test-failed --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Sep 3 17:38:29 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0224CE16389; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 17:38:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmd@freebsd.org) Received: from www.poelloepaeae.de (v22017034403546374.happysrv.de [188.68.38.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BECD672D8F; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 17:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmd@freebsd.org) Received: from manray.ogolem.org (c-73-195-214-55.hsd1.nj.comcast.net [73.195.214.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.poelloepaeae.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2172A18811B; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 19:00:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2017 13:00:17 -0400 From: Johannes M Dieterich To: Cy Schubert Cc: blubee blubeeme , David Chisnall , freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] future of drm1 in base Message-ID: <20170903130017.0a5fdc36@manray.ogolem.org> In-Reply-To: <201709031651.v83Gp3He026291@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <201709031651.v83Gp3He026291@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 17:38:29 -0000 On Sun, 03 Sep 2017 09:51:03 -0700 Cy Schubert wrote: > (Replying inline) > In message > om> > , blubee blubeeme writes: > > I also have a current machine with one of those listed gpu. > > > > A friend got hacked on windows, I got them setup with a ryzen chip > > and no integrated GPU. Finding a supported gpu was a challenge but, > > those old drivers allow the machine to have display. > > > > Please try to maintain the older drivers, thanks. Well, from now on you can recommend also AMD Tahiti up to Polaris alongside the binary Nvidia driver, assuming the system is amd64. :-) > > I wouldn't mind taking care of and feeding the new port if it's > created. Thank you! It does look to me that there is a need for continued support to exist. So we will create a port now and then I will propose removal of drm1 from base so that users of graphics/drm-next-kmod and graphics/drm-legacy-kmod can more easily co-exist in the future. I will probably issue a CFT after the port landed to make sure that everything still works and would much appreciate if people with the hardware could give it a spin. Thank you everybody for your responses! Johannes From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Sep 3 18:51:07 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE104E19646 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 18:51:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from mail.abinet.ru (mail.abinet.ru [84.52.119.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8321574B83 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 18:51:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from sphinx.abinet.ru (unknown [192.168.2.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.abinet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 848A1D289 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 18:44:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Synaptics Issues To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org References: <393ee3b1-14c1-3a74-21c7-ef2557aa448c@nomadlogic.org> From: abi Message-ID: <24216593-f788-5280-7801-12bf5b2a6c05@abinet.ru> Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2017 21:43:46 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <393ee3b1-14c1-3a74-21c7-ef2557aa448c@nomadlogic.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=abinet.ru; s=dkim; t=1504464247; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=dqzMkBYHVk0XIR12RKVcJUQ8u8WGypcMLCjP23I1uB0=; b=Uep5X7V8C4l8NCYrtT1Zx9XY8fBIFpWgxzxfnK1NswVael92tllnQV8MsKQqeCp1hcPBZi N3JD9zv0FTlbOZv3z9UZVlTmoASYA7/o79UrFTRExNR0uAxFIDA8WNBZ2FWd3EtCOucY2d dxejt4YAaC+trc5iZH2zgZy/mbWxX9s= X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 18:51:07 -0000 03.09.2017 19:49, Pete Wright пишет: > Hi there, > > I have a laptop from System76 that has a synaptics touchpad. I was > wondering how synaptics has been working on other platforms. I'm > running into issues with my touchpad which require me to either > restart or disable the device altogether. I'm running > CURRENT/drm-next - but suspect this may happen on other releases as well. > > symptoms: > > - boot system without enabling synaptics via loader.conf. moused > detects psm device, xorg picks up device and treats it as a sysmouse. > not advanced features work (palm detection for example) - but mouse > mostly works. periodically the mouse will start jumping randomly on > display and i'll have to disable the mouse device and/or restart > computer to regain full control. > > > - boot system enabling synaptics via loader.conf. xorg detects mouse > and loads the synaptics xorg driver. advanced features mostly work - > but after a short amount of time (several hours) mouse becomes much > more erratic than scenario above. a system restart is required to > regain control of mouse. > > > i've done a bunch of testing of passing synaptic Xorg params that I > got from a working ubuntu install, but that has not helped. i'm kind > of at a loss at this point though, is the issue with Xorg or with > FreeBSD's synaptics kernel implementation? any pointers for debugging > would be really appreciated! > > > -pete > Well, synaptics is not working for me at all (Dell XPS 13 Skylake). It loads, but produces a lot of spam in xorg log, mouse jumping randomly. It works as sysmouse. So, I think yes, Xorg or FreeBSD has something fishy with synaptics. Personally, I'm waiting for evdev or libinput support, so I disabled touchpad. From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Sep 3 19:19:24 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D35E1A62E; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 19:19:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x22f.google.com (mail-it0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0D7375519; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 19:19:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id c13so10489012itb.0; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 12:19:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=msNQYTKY4ujbE+jwWPbaNgw4jChew9FuUHAko8MnNBk=; b=RHgPdBGUszZm+xT3LzqSLDlV7aBHOTOa6XM85+pFj/r8cf9Diwsm48GkaLDeNU2OLq t/ZNU+xVbHLjysUcOXnfyiSS0AHJuCJDFCU4pvUbGcKtU052pTaVp9YpxD50cxY02FbI 22XrcjQkqQ1H742f1gY0tuUB6PHc6J5SG0aH/GB+l1asXjL6ihyc0RYva2LvJsV7Xx0e 6Ia8St2S7vz4sIEGay03Ml0Hx0ejeE9IwMV4xBHbwhqGOUEy2V0U5d9lr/LA4rccgps/ Nrp0yQ5ue6F9tC8nCrv2rOe5bu66vYTCWDybixp1e3S8WyGq+s3Q+lE9gwJe/BHqZtmK bAkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=msNQYTKY4ujbE+jwWPbaNgw4jChew9FuUHAko8MnNBk=; b=CCaYlt73ubS9uYg+KbnmROKNYf4cmxTQswORIz9OnX4VjPZMTvyzTt3ERUzZqImnu4 ExQ7JhVrS6hSdMe0R+K9J65cC5UwhrSd788LQwaeLaX6j64v65vfcvJCRWUwQiIupSwP 4fa+f3bibyRF984gmZMP01fJA0gySP1mD3wHYdvhx63sMdlj4cW3OdsOS5I7g2C2jLvv XUufN2+0VRISbuTtMdwHYgPqvnN+K7CPV99WsQ+UGNehijzVSDh1ANyplWz1+aEsvPVq ibXu1Snm0VDcBegM5GxtWUk8hET3MvWf5Dhx07su8N3I1QVcGpJoq+n763YdsdRqZ1p/ yUwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUizHVBsIuVC+TlkQPvgAaiiZQwYT471ep+S431KxjLGU5Z9R2FD Id4mQUH5CwpbAlxZ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb7uJ5LSBGrjzgdEZ/v6cFZnnpFAqyfhZdbWwDR/UdmtQFZYUdzfpKuePFjWk7aoik0+pS+ErQ== X-Received: by 10.36.144.195 with SMTP id x186mr5169309itd.5.1504466362750; Sun, 03 Sep 2017 12:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bish ([75.98.19.132]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b66sm2587447itb.0.2017.09.03.12.19.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 03 Sep 2017 12:19:21 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Mark Johnston Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2017 12:19:09 -0700 From: Mark Johnston To: Johannes M Dieterich Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] future of drm1 in base Message-ID: <20170903191908.GA1259@bish> References: <20170902220257.6667280e@manray.ogolem.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170902220257.6667280e@manray.ogolem.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 19:19:24 -0000 On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 10:02:57PM -0400, Johannes M Dieterich wrote: > Dear current/x11, > > please CC me on responses. > > I am writing you on behalf of the FreeBSDDesktop team concerning the > future of drm1 in base. > > drm1 in base supports the following GPUs: > * 3dfx Banshee/Voodoo3+ (tdfx) > * ATI Rage 128 (r128) > * ATI Rage Pro (mach64) > * Matrox G200/G400 (mga) > * Savage3D/MX/IX, Savage4, SuperSavage, Twister, ProSavage[DDR] (savage) > * SIS 300/630/540 and XGI V3XE/V5/V8 (sis) > * VIA Unichrome / Pro (via) > > Since their original introduction up to 2010 these drivers have mostly > been maintained as part of larger cleanups. The newest hardware drm1 > supports dates from 2004, if I am not mistaken, and most of the > hardware is AGP-based. > > With the introduction of graphics/drm-next-kmod which brings its own > drm.ko following the Linux notation, we are facing collisions between > these old drivers' drm.ko and the newer one. I don't think this is a real problem. The reason one currently needs to manually load the drm-next drm.ko (rather than just kldloading a driver and having it pick up the right drm.ko automatically) is that our drm.ko defines the same module ("drmn") as drm2.ko in the base system. So upon attempting to load a drm-next driver, the kernel uses the linker hints to load drm2.ko, which is incorrect. However, this can be addressed by simply bumping the drmn version in the port and modifying the drivers accordingly. I've submitted a 4-line PR which does exactly that. After that change, we can modify the pkg-message to omit drm.ko from the kld_list value. As a result, the name of our DRM module doesn't matter since users don't need to specify it, so the collision with drm1 isn't a problem. > We would like to hear if anybody still runs CURRENT on machines housing > the above GPUs and relies on drm1. > > If there are still a significant number of people running CURRENT on > this hardware in production, we would be willing to make a > graphics/drm-legacy-kmod port. With the PR I mentioned above, I think it's a non-issue to keep drm1 in the base system. Since there appear to be at least some users of those drivers, I really think it would be preferable to avoid removing them unless it's absolutely necessary. From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sun Sep 3 22:13:35 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870E2E21901 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 22:13:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [88.98.225.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3352B7E2E4 for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 22:13:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from crayon2.yoonka.com (crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v83LwFL4031455 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 3 Sep 2017 21:58:15 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Subject: Re: Synaptics Issues To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org References: <393ee3b1-14c1-3a74-21c7-ef2557aa448c@nomadlogic.org> <24216593-f788-5280-7801-12bf5b2a6c05@abinet.ru> From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: <35ef5b52-b87c-e3af-75b7-fdbc5d20c02f@gjunka.com> Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2017 21:58:15 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <24216593-f788-5280-7801-12bf5b2a6c05@abinet.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-GB-large X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 22:13:35 -0000 I am running standard FreeBSD 11 and a synaptic touchpad on my laptop works just fine. I didn't have to configure anything. It worked out of the box. So probably can't help you much with what would need to be configured but would be happy to run some debug commands if you know of any. GrzegorzJ On 03/09/2017 18:43, abi wrote: > > 03.09.2017 19:49, Pete Wright пишет: >> Hi there, >> >> I have a laptop from System76 that has a synaptics touchpad. I was >> wondering how synaptics has been working on other platforms. I'm >> running into issues with my touchpad which require me to either >> restart or disable the device altogether. I'm running >> CURRENT/drm-next - but suspect this may happen on other releases as >> well. >> >> symptoms: >> >> - boot system without enabling synaptics via loader.conf. moused >> detects psm device, xorg picks up device and treats it as a >> sysmouse. not advanced features work (palm detection for example) - >> but mouse mostly works. periodically the mouse will start jumping >> randomly on display and i'll have to disable the mouse device and/or >> restart computer to regain full control. >> >> >> - boot system enabling synaptics via loader.conf. xorg detects mouse >> and loads the synaptics xorg driver. advanced features mostly work - >> but after a short amount of time (several hours) mouse becomes much >> more erratic than scenario above. a system restart is required to >> regain control of mouse. >> >> >> i've done a bunch of testing of passing synaptic Xorg params that I >> got from a working ubuntu install, but that has not helped. i'm kind >> of at a loss at this point though, is the issue with Xorg or with >> FreeBSD's synaptics kernel implementation? any pointers for >> debugging would be really appreciated! >> >> >> -pete >> > > Well, synaptics is not working for me at all (Dell XPS 13 Skylake). It > loads, but produces a lot of spam in xorg log, mouse jumping randomly. > It works as sysmouse. So, I think yes, Xorg or FreeBSD has something > fishy with synaptics. Personally, I'm waiting for evdev or libinput > support, so I disabled touchpad. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Sep 4 19:58:44 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3421E1AB51; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 19:58:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmd@freebsd.org) Received: from www.poelloepaeae.de (v22017034403546374.happysrv.de [188.68.38.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC3A28367E; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 19:58:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmd@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman (www.poelloepaeae.de [192.168.1.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.poelloepaeae.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D893D18811D; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 21:33:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Johannes M Dieterich To: Mark Johnston Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] future of drm1 in base In-Reply-To: <20170903191908.GA1259@bish> Message-ID: <20170904193337.Horde.Wm3jEJaHwm_CuvGbAmSToz8@www.poelloepaeae.de> User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 19:33:37 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 19:58:45 -0000 Mark Johnston – Sun., 3. September 2017 15:19 > On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 10:02:57PM -0400, Johannes M Dieterich wrote: > > Dear current/x11, > > > > please CC me on responses. > > > > I am writing you on behalf of the FreeBSDDesktop team concerning the > > future of drm1 in base. > > > > drm1 in base supports the following GPUs: > > * 3dfx Banshee/Voodoo3+ (tdfx) > > * ATI Rage 128 (r128) > > * ATI Rage Pro (mach64) > > * Matrox G200/G400 (mga) > > * Savage3D/MX/IX, Savage4, SuperSavage, Twister, ProSavage[DDR] (savage) > > * SIS 300/630/540 and XGI V3XE/V5/V8 (sis) > > * VIA Unichrome / Pro (via) > > > > Since their original introduction up to 2010 these drivers have mostly > > been maintained as part of larger cleanups. The newest hardware drm1 > > supports dates from 2004, if I am not mistaken, and most of the > > hardware is AGP-based. > > > > With the introduction of graphics/drm-next-kmod which brings its own > > drm.ko following the Linux notation, we are facing collisions between > > these old drivers' drm.ko and the newer one. > > I don't think this is a real problem. The reason one currently needs to > manually load the drm-next drm.ko (rather than just kldloading a driver > and having it pick up the right drm.ko automatically) is that our drm.ko > defines the same module ("drmn") as drm2.ko in the base system. So upon > attempting to load a drm-next driver, the kernel uses the linker hints > to load drm2.ko, which is incorrect. However, this can be addressed by > simply bumping the drmn version in the port and modifying the drivers > accordingly. I've submitted a 4-line PR which does exactly that. After > that change, we can modify the pkg-message to omit drm.ko from the > kld_list value. As a result, the name of our DRM module doesn't matter > since users don't need to specify it, so the collision with drm1 isn't a > problem. > > > We would like to hear if anybody still runs CURRENT on machines housing > > the above GPUs and relies on drm1. > > > > If there are still a significant number of people running CURRENT on > > this hardware in production, we would be willing to make a > > graphics/drm-legacy-kmod port. > > With the PR I mentioned above, I think it's a non-issue to keep drm1 in > the base system. Since there appear to be at least some users of those > drivers, I really think it would be preferable to avoid removing them > unless it's absolutely necessary. Your proposed solution does work, thanks for providing it! Let's move this conversation to a later point in time then. Johannes From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Sep 4 20:28:40 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A1AE1C352 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 20:28:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.bowling@kev009.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFE16BD9 for ; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 20:28:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.bowling@kev009.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x235.google.com with SMTP id n18so11079032oig.2 for ; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 13:28:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kev009.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jgay9rPnO14HSQ/WcPJ0NQaldbigf9JJtO2gDZjZDRY=; b=pYWVNPXQUIE90HlnKWc4s3lqgM8Z62h07qo6zD8DKGXvQ3cOgHDSIURmBiXdcoMh6g tqkhsP5iebATdE0hzPBQPik8dlBMEnYUdoHBlVYtlJymo1APD84oS+VadM/HdnbKHH0g PO2qrsW7WKyB2tdq99mwXOvn74HdBnraqwyJE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Jgay9rPnO14HSQ/WcPJ0NQaldbigf9JJtO2gDZjZDRY=; b=emFhHPMqfhweqRUyHO5J/0SipRFxkDRF+dMENU9o01N/h2eLL0j9vMYr1QQBUnM4wI 9BgCfAZgdxfAZI3XwgLGMfaPO4xyb6tn5gxmiXC+0qquYefBI+OAlbuj5MXsRUrp7xHV v/l+yNpVoLfdAMfsL+HUljUrVnIBVUqKOypOZWfVG0WlZXg181NCohmd9LqDNUwTUgIK Tj43FyL41Vp547L4Ze2d9viz9d3fLSiZn3ncsfb2Kn3/pGAXXryqhFRDNDhpM6TK9FB8 Nb/KBAS0neNLSwSTtQ0xscPDq0PEw14yXo2v0u7O/rYJeVFbRSOgbxsnagDTWPBV4wad ES/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUhoogu+l220Mx5cMM/9k4bmTJutzedwK/KpNTY98QRGE6OfhUVm h9ywR62trrX23GboOyFBSzYkUpzS5wX3ArU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb73R9JyFWWdScV0BQTT6Kg9BEYiFz2K1kGcNSpXwUzv30RhHXVdvnQQoylY9z7rJYK3UJhe4sDWL9ZtyF80yHU= X-Received: by 10.202.85.19 with SMTP id j19mr1406865oib.197.1504556918925; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 13:28:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.57.165 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 13:28:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170904193337.Horde.Wm3jEJaHwm_CuvGbAmSToz8@www.poelloepaeae.de> References: <20170903191908.GA1259@bish> <20170904193337.Horde.Wm3jEJaHwm_CuvGbAmSToz8@www.poelloepaeae.de> From: Kevin Bowling Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 13:28:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC] future of drm1 in base To: Johannes M Dieterich Cc: Mark Johnston , freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 20:28:40 -0000 I wasn't subscribed to -x11 earlier but do want to add some commentary to this thread. The language describing these drivers in upstream is not at all ambiguous WRT to how bad these are and Linux distributions have dropped them: menuconfig DRM_LEGACY bool "Enable legacy drivers (DANGEROUS)" depends on DRM && MMU select DRM_VM help Enable legacy DRI1 drivers. Those drivers expose unsafe and dangerous APIs to user-space, which can be used to circumvent access restrictions and other security measures. For backwards compatibility those drivers are still available, but their use is highly inadvisable and might harm your system. You are recommended to use the safe modeset-only drivers instead, and perform 3D emulation in user-space. Unless you have strong reasons to go rogue, say "N". There seems to be some kind of misunderstanding that removing these drivers is taking something away from users. I disagree. It does _not_ deorbit HW support. We'd be giving users a supportable and secure experience by dropping them. For 2d desktop it is likely that a framebuffer is fast(er) as David states. On any reasonable CPU 3d (like the server models people pointed out) may even be faster using llvmpipe. Regards, On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Johannes M Dieterich wro= te: > > > > Mark Johnston =E2=80=93 Sun., 3. September 2017 15:19 >> On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 10:02:57PM -0400, Johannes M Dieterich wrote: >> > Dear current/x11, >> > >> > please CC me on responses. >> > >> > I am writing you on behalf of the FreeBSDDesktop team concerning the >> > future of drm1 in base. >> > >> > drm1 in base supports the following GPUs: >> > * 3dfx Banshee/Voodoo3+ (tdfx) >> > * ATI Rage 128 (r128) >> > * ATI Rage Pro (mach64) >> > * Matrox G200/G400 (mga) >> > * Savage3D/MX/IX, Savage4, SuperSavage, Twister, ProSavage[DDR] (savag= e) >> > * SIS 300/630/540 and XGI V3XE/V5/V8 (sis) >> > * VIA Unichrome / Pro (via) >> > >> > Since their original introduction up to 2010 these drivers have mostly >> > been maintained as part of larger cleanups. The newest hardware drm1 >> > supports dates from 2004, if I am not mistaken, and most of the >> > hardware is AGP-based. >> > >> > With the introduction of graphics/drm-next-kmod which brings its own >> > drm.ko following the Linux notation, we are facing collisions between >> > these old drivers' drm.ko and the newer one. >> >> I don't think this is a real problem. The reason one currently needs to >> manually load the drm-next drm.ko (rather than just kldloading a driver >> and having it pick up the right drm.ko automatically) is that our drm.ko >> defines the same module ("drmn") as drm2.ko in the base system. So upon >> attempting to load a drm-next driver, the kernel uses the linker hints >> to load drm2.ko, which is incorrect. However, this can be addressed by >> simply bumping the drmn version in the port and modifying the drivers >> accordingly. I've submitted a 4-line PR which does exactly that. After >> that change, we can modify the pkg-message to omit drm.ko from the >> kld_list value. As a result, the name of our DRM module doesn't matter >> since users don't need to specify it, so the collision with drm1 isn't a >> problem. >> >> > We would like to hear if anybody still runs CURRENT on machines housin= g >> > the above GPUs and relies on drm1. >> > >> > If there are still a significant number of people running CURRENT on >> > this hardware in production, we would be willing to make a >> > graphics/drm-legacy-kmod port. >> >> With the PR I mentioned above, I think it's a non-issue to keep drm1 in >> the base system. Since there appear to be at least some users of those >> drivers, I really think it would be preferable to avoid removing them >> unless it's absolutely necessary. > Your proposed solution does work, thanks for providing it! Let's move thi= s conversation to a later point in time then. > > Johannes > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Mon Sep 4 20:53:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6712E1DA9F; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 20:53:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x22f.google.com (mail-io0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98B0E1D0C; Mon, 4 Sep 2017 20:53:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markjdb@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id z67so5640028iof.3; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 13:53:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=x3FuVoRomfXfMTx0Kdj4d6KdRhMyZ4SennDXdq/2Lis=; b=B5OrUJE0yINFmh0cmIfbG+GkluLC8dAzKLx9M5+Y3yEiqPsdcDmh0ub4CGPlo3leoo 1kXPZhdRQfUSgG9RD7AGGeWvRxmsGReh7b2it/71ikzFD5RRmzWCzloz8gM6+vNdObju TTHbC432gDRMMI8PfcyMnKavNCCTCpXPT1z8Imw37SrZA4h6Txz3SdG5ZZ1bBVTJLpk9 KY4Ov1cGYLnM5wSU+eQQp8eJxAXWCYmMMYiyjnZyXG/97mvv3FhI43pbeRyWvln66Fhk bLEaQtgsODbTjAyTCuzhd+7sBrtLQkPr4ekPBgUvSD8jHNEBQxueKkSwhn2dcETiMB6R d4YQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=x3FuVoRomfXfMTx0Kdj4d6KdRhMyZ4SennDXdq/2Lis=; b=rnNdCrH3xZo41qWtQKV9Oq7XHE2+IqNN6bmWa1y2T1crOpUNAt8MNTfuosfAkZ1//X CCRhYrLSW31gPt3r6YfF+wLLmESIjUd5IOfM96TR9s1wzK8YAXewiqv5TIMvzGxrqhsz DrPPTBQjv4nXaXy3jJeASMR0dutdBFMWnNghB8di69f+zF1iKqn30KktPgjViS6jFZ73 Ti0x1iRQGnFG4hAHBTRawtQgJs9ivecWIPGhikTNYDSIYTXxHvlBONFZQ/6DxV8vpDRY 0FHVOTTHOu5sklNVfQnxF7abXvIIxeqV6Ke3sAwQ6J/AhdDEgoVXkOtMs+TeEC0LAIW4 +1hg== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjJiFAbjdlFAgdZUx58EMdCmVa76bpvceJrrTQlXFlUx1gzFAVy 8YPkYcvrAfJhqbpVBaA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb5Erx8Q/rFGMWontVGCu8gzGC0N8AEeFGwiT0vyNg1HZNHb7AJ6lZugG3LwuK0v6NOsf7/Rtg== X-Received: by 10.107.166.2 with SMTP id p2mr1891336ioe.63.1504558390865; Mon, 04 Sep 2017 13:53:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bish (toroon0560w-lp130-01-174-88-79-183.dsl.bell.ca. [174.88.79.183]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e17sm3887180iod.10.2017.09.04.13.53.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 04 Sep 2017 13:53:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Mark Johnston Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 16:53:08 -0400 From: Mark Johnston To: Kevin Bowling Cc: Johannes M Dieterich , freebsd-x11@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] future of drm1 in base Message-ID: <20170904205308.GB3048@bish> References: <20170903191908.GA1259@bish> <20170904193337.Horde.Wm3jEJaHwm_CuvGbAmSToz8@www.poelloepaeae.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Sep 2017 20:53:12 -0000 On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 01:28:38PM -0700, Kevin Bowling wrote: > I wasn't subscribed to -x11 earlier but do want to add some commentary > to this thread. > > The language describing these drivers in upstream is not at all > ambiguous WRT to how bad these are and Linux distributions have > dropped them: > > > menuconfig DRM_LEGACY > bool "Enable legacy drivers (DANGEROUS)" > depends on DRM && MMU > select DRM_VM > help > Enable legacy DRI1 drivers. Those drivers expose unsafe and dangerous > APIs to user-space, which can be used to circumvent access > restrictions and other security measures. For backwards compatibility > those drivers are still available, but their use is highly > inadvisable and might harm your system. > > You are recommended to use the safe modeset-only drivers instead, and > perform 3D emulation in user-space. > > Unless you have strong reasons to go rogue, say "N". > > > There seems to be some kind of misunderstanding that removing these > drivers is taking something away from users. I disagree. It does > _not_ deorbit HW support. We'd be giving users a supportable and > secure experience by dropping them. For 2d desktop it is likely that > a framebuffer is fast(er) as David states. On any reasonable CPU 3d > (like the server models people pointed out) may even be faster using > llvmpipe. I don't disagree in principle with removing the drivers, but if it's done it should be done for a good reason. I addressed the issue of the KLD name collision below, but security concerns are a more valid motivation for removing them. OTOH, the legacy drivers are not included in GENERIC kernels, so we're effectively doing the same thing as upstream Linux by making them opt-in by default, albeit without the scary warning. > > Regards, > > On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 12:33 PM, Johannes M Dieterich wrote: > > > > > > > > Mark Johnston – Sun., 3. September 2017 15:19 > >> On Sat, Sep 02, 2017 at 10:02:57PM -0400, Johannes M Dieterich wrote: > >> > Dear current/x11, > >> > > >> > please CC me on responses. > >> > > >> > I am writing you on behalf of the FreeBSDDesktop team concerning the > >> > future of drm1 in base. > >> > > >> > drm1 in base supports the following GPUs: > >> > * 3dfx Banshee/Voodoo3+ (tdfx) > >> > * ATI Rage 128 (r128) > >> > * ATI Rage Pro (mach64) > >> > * Matrox G200/G400 (mga) > >> > * Savage3D/MX/IX, Savage4, SuperSavage, Twister, ProSavage[DDR] (savage) > >> > * SIS 300/630/540 and XGI V3XE/V5/V8 (sis) > >> > * VIA Unichrome / Pro (via) > >> > > >> > Since their original introduction up to 2010 these drivers have mostly > >> > been maintained as part of larger cleanups. The newest hardware drm1 > >> > supports dates from 2004, if I am not mistaken, and most of the > >> > hardware is AGP-based. > >> > > >> > With the introduction of graphics/drm-next-kmod which brings its own > >> > drm.ko following the Linux notation, we are facing collisions between > >> > these old drivers' drm.ko and the newer one. > >> > >> I don't think this is a real problem. The reason one currently needs to > >> manually load the drm-next drm.ko (rather than just kldloading a driver > >> and having it pick up the right drm.ko automatically) is that our drm.ko > >> defines the same module ("drmn") as drm2.ko in the base system. So upon > >> attempting to load a drm-next driver, the kernel uses the linker hints > >> to load drm2.ko, which is incorrect. However, this can be addressed by > >> simply bumping the drmn version in the port and modifying the drivers > >> accordingly. I've submitted a 4-line PR which does exactly that. After > >> that change, we can modify the pkg-message to omit drm.ko from the > >> kld_list value. As a result, the name of our DRM module doesn't matter > >> since users don't need to specify it, so the collision with drm1 isn't a > >> problem. > >> > >> > We would like to hear if anybody still runs CURRENT on machines housing > >> > the above GPUs and relies on drm1. > >> > > >> > If there are still a significant number of people running CURRENT on > >> > this hardware in production, we would be willing to make a > >> > graphics/drm-legacy-kmod port. > >> > >> With the PR I mentioned above, I think it's a non-issue to keep drm1 in > >> the base system. Since there appear to be at least some users of those > >> drivers, I really think it would be preferable to avoid removing them > >> unless it's absolutely necessary. > > Your proposed solution does work, thanks for providing it! Let's move this conversation to a later point in time then. > > > > Johannes > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 00:11:16 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1A3E03A72 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 00:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from janm@transactionware.com) Received: from mail3.transactionware.com (mail.transactionware.com [203.14.245.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DA4C66FF7 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 00:11:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from janm@transactionware.com) Received: (qmail 33274 invoked by uid 907); 5 Sep 2017 00:04:31 -0000 Received: from eth222.nsw.adsl.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.101]) (150.101.196.221) (smtp-auth username janm, mechanism plain) by mail3.transactionware.com (qpsmtpd/0.84) with (ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPSA; Tue, 05 Sep 2017 10:04:31 +1000 From: Jan Mikkelsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Future graphics/drm-next-kmod support on 11-STABLE? Message-Id: <916E6128-4239-4050-987F-EB0816C53F13@transactionware.com> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 10:05:16 +1000 Cc: jmd@freebsd.org To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 00:11:16 -0000 Hi, Thanks for the graphics work, will try it out soon. Does this work depend on changes in 12-CURRENT that will not be = backported to 11-STABLE? Do you expect the port to work with 11-STABLE = in future? Thanks, Jan Mikkelsen From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 07:28:43 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4447E1EE49 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 07:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmd@freebsd.org) Received: from www.poelloepaeae.de (v22017034403546374.happysrv.de [188.68.38.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE97081DC9 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 07:28:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmd@freebsd.org) Received: from manray.ogolem.org (HSI-KBW-134-3-230-69.hsi14.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de [134.3.230.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by www.poelloepaeae.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6EE3518811B; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 08:49:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 02:48:56 -0400 From: Johannes M Dieterich To: Jan Mikkelsen Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Future graphics/drm-next-kmod support on 11-STABLE? Message-ID: <20170905024856.65b47eef@manray.ogolem.org> In-Reply-To: <916E6128-4239-4050-987F-EB0816C53F13@transactionware.com> References: <916E6128-4239-4050-987F-EB0816C53F13@transactionware.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 07:28:44 -0000 On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 10:05:16 +1000 Jan Mikkelsen wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the graphics work, will try it out soon. > > Does this work depend on changes in 12-CURRENT that will not be > backported to 11-STABLE? Do you expect the port to work with > 11-STABLE in future? The port does depend on rather extensive changes made to the linuxkpi in CURRENT, yes. We did discuss backporting and the current consensus seems to be that we let things stabilize in CURRENT before doing that. Hope this helps, Johannes From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 09:24:26 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11AE3E226A1 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 09:24:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBE766239 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 09:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id ED1FAE226A0; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 09:24:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECC96E2269F for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 09:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA4BA66238 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 09:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v859OPDI001771 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 09:24:25 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v859OP0x001770; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 09:24:25 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201709050924.v859OP0x001770@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 09:24:25 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: x11@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 09:24:26 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/x11@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ graphics/mesa-dri | 17.1.7 | 17.2.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 11:21:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C11D6E03AA0 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29237556C for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9EC5DE03A9F; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6EDE03A9E for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D40775569 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v85BLBuc013118 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:21:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: maintainer-approval requested: [Bug 220982] graphics/mesa-dri: update to 17.2.0 (currently release candidates) : [Attachment 186074] release Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:21:10 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Type: request X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:21:11 -0000 Jan Beich has asked x11@FreeBSD.org for maintainer-approval: Bug 220982: graphics/mesa-dri: update to 17.2.0 (currently release candidat= es) https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220982 Attachment 186074: release https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D186074&action=3Dedit --- Comment #10 from Jan Beich --- Created attachment 186074 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D186074&action= =3Dedit release From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 11:21:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC22AE03AA4 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF95C7556F for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CEE47E03AA2; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE845E03AA1 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B51637556D for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v85BLBue013118 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:21:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220982] graphics/mesa-dri: update to 17.2.0 (currently release candidates) Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:21:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete cc flagtypes.name attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:21:12 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220982 Jan Beich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #185642|0 |1 is obsolete| | CC| |x11@FreeBSD.org Attachment #186074| |maintainer-approval?(x11@Fr Flags| |eeBSD.org) --- Comment #10 from Jan Beich --- Created attachment 186074 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D186074&action= =3Dedit release --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 11:22:24 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1B4E03C5A for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:22:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AAAD759BB for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:22:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 59FE2E03C59; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:22:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599B3E03C51 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:22:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46D57759B8 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:22:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v85BMOaE017039 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:22:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220982] graphics/mesa-dri: update to 17.2.0 Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:22:24 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, patch-ready X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status keywords bug_file_loc short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:22:24 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220982 Jan Beich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |Open Keywords| |patch-ready URL| |https://www.mesa3d.org/reln | |otes/17.2.0.html Summary|graphics/mesa-dri: update |graphics/mesa-dri: update |to 17.2.0 (currently |to 17.2.0 |release candidates) | --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 11:26:27 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219ABE03F41 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:26:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079C1762C2 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:26:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 07089E03F3C; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:26:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06BB5E03F3B for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:26:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8AB4762C1 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:26:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v85BQQtO024368 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 11:26:26 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221540] graphics/mesa-dri: enable Vulkan drivers Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:26:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 11:26:27 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221540 Jan Beich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needs-qa --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 12:57:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E172EE07BE9 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 12:57:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ina.smith@getadditional-visitors.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7B8263873 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 12:57:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ina.smith@getadditional-visitors.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C7267E07BE8; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 12:57:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D31E07BE7 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 12:57:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ina.smith@getadditional-visitors.com) Received: from apr2.uthara.zzux.com (apr2.uthara.zzux.com [95.211.244.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77EE66386B for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 12:57:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ina.smith@getadditional-visitors.com) Received: from WS114 (unknown [223.190.56.72]) by apr2.uthara.zzux.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 67F0F436F0 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 12:57:01 +0000 (UTC) From: "Ina smith" To: Subject: Did Google send you a warning for your non-HTTPS website yet? Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 18:19:42 +0530 Message-ID: <07ad01d32646$7cd55bc0$76801340$@getadditional-visitors.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdMmQ3Zcnv5I4oY6RWedOkulDNx9eA== Content-Language: en-us Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 12:57:12 -0000 Hi, Are you still using a non-HTTPS website? If yes, you are very close to getting a warning from Google stating that Chrome will display a security warning on your site starting October 2017. If your website has text input fields on an HTTP page or it is opened in the incognito mode, Chrome will display a warning notification to the user. What's next? Your website might as well be deemed "not secure" in the near future. And what happens next to that is writ large. Fewer form submissions and lesser conversions. Secure your business and your website's SEO. Move to HTTPs today. Visit our blog for your FREE DIY guide to moving from HTTP to HTTPS or just drop a reply to this email to get this done by experts at ResultFirst. Thanks, Ina Smith Marketing Manager ResultFirst Inc. Head Office: San Jose, CA 95120 In case you are NOT INTERESTED, reply with "UNSUBSCRIBE" and you will be removed from our database within 2 business days, don't worry! From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 14:05:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB20E0B5F1 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:05:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE94A6FBCC for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:05:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CDDBCE0B5F0; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7D1E0B5EF for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:05:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B60EF6FBC8 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:05:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v85E5BuH005857 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:05:11 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221814] x11/pixman: fails to build on armv6 with clang 5 Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 14:05:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: commit-hook@freebsd.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 14:05:12 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221814 --- Comment #2 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: swills Date: Tue Sep 5 14:04:11 UTC 2017 New revision: 449285 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/449285 Log: x11/pixman: fix build on armv6 with clang 5 PR: 221814 Submitted by: mikael.urankar@gmail.com Changes: head/x11/pixman/Makefile --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 14:31:29 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCA9E0C703 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:31:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B6FA747CE for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:31:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6A8C8E0C702; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:31:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601E6E0C701 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:31:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46E66747CA for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:31:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v85EVSe4065794 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:31:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221814] x11/pixman: fails to build on armv6 with clang 5 Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 14:31:29 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: swills@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 14:31:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221814 Steve Wills changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|New |Closed --- Comment #3 from Steve Wills --- Committed, thanks! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 15:11:02 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95CA5E0DDC6 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 15:11:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nbe@renzel.net) Received: from nijmegen.renzel.net (mx1.renzel.net [195.243.213.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.renzel.net", Issuer "renzel.net Root CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 524037FF42 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 15:11:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nbe@renzel.net) X-Virus-Scanned: GDATA Antivirus at gdata-milter.renzel.de.isb X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.0 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from dublin.vkf.isb.de.renzel.net (unknown [10.0.0.80]) by nijmegen.renzel.net (smtpd) with ESMTP id F275D1414849 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 17:10:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from asbach.renzel.net (unknown [172.18.96.1]) by dublin.vkf.isb.de.renzel.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EA03A843DD for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 17:10:10 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: drm-next-kmod panic References: <69456e0e-8b97-51fd-8a65-023ecb093cfd@nomadlogic.org> To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org From: Nils Beyer Organization: VKF Renzel GmbH Message-ID: Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 17:10:10 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <69456e0e-8b97-51fd-8a65-023ecb093cfd@nomadlogic.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on nijmegen.renzel.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 15:11:02 -0000 On 08/31/2017 19:09, Pete Wright wrote: > if there is no core in /var/crash you can try adding this sysctl knob which may increase the probability of capturing a core for analysis: Same problem - but I have a crash dump; here's a partial text portion: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0x20 fault code = supervisor read data, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff8280ddba stack pointer = 0x28:0xfffffe0117fcf7e0 frame pointer = 0x28:0xfffffe0117fcf840 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 0 (linuxkpi_short_wq_2) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 0 time = 1504630325 KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0xffffffff80abecf7 at kdb_backtrace+0x67 #1 0xffffffff80a7b0bc at vpanic+0x19c #2 0xffffffff80a7af13 at panic+0x43 #3 0xffffffff80efc18d at trap_fatal+0x34d #4 0xffffffff80efc1e9 at trap_pfault+0x49 #5 0xffffffff80efba39 at trap+0x2a9 #6 0xffffffff80edf0d1 at calltrap+0x8 #7 0xffffffff8291cc44 at intel_fbdev_initial_config+0x14 #8 0xffffffff82870957 at async_run_entry_fn+0x27 #9 0xffffffff828641a0 at linux_work_fn+0xe0 #10 0xffffffff80ad0667 at taskqueue_run_locked+0x147 #11 0xffffffff80ad1848 at taskqueue_thread_loop+0xb8 #12 0xffffffff80a3e4b5 at fork_exit+0x85 #13 0xffffffff80edf6be at fork_trampoline+0xe Uptime: 6s Dumping 314 out of 3929 MB:..6%..11%..21%..31%..41%..51%..62%..72%..82%..92% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Shall I open a bug report? BR, Nils From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 16:43:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7085AE11C54 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:43:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@nomadlogic.org) Received: from vps-mail.nomadlogic.org (unknown [IPv6:2607:f2f8:a098::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDD0A6E617 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:43:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pete@nomadlogic.org) Received: from [10.44.139.243] (nat-192-187-90-114.nat.tribpub.com [192.187.90.114]) by vps-mail.nomadlogic.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 126c9fe3 TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 09:43:08 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: drm-next-kmod panic To: Nils Beyer , freebsd-x11@freebsd.org References: <69456e0e-8b97-51fd-8a65-023ecb093cfd@nomadlogic.org> From: Pete Wright Message-ID: <0d085613-cb55-c2e3-142f-93fc4fe388df@nomadlogic.org> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 09:43:07 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 16:43:11 -0000 On 09/05/2017 08:10, Nils Beyer wrote: > On 08/31/2017 19:09, Pete Wright wrote: >> if there is no core in /var/crash you can try adding this sysctl knob >> which may increase the probability of capturing a core for analysis: > > Same problem - but I have a crash dump; here's a partial text portion: > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 > fault virtual address   = 0x20 > fault code              = supervisor read data, page not present > instruction pointer     = 0x20:0xffffffff8280ddba > stack pointer           = 0x28:0xfffffe0117fcf7e0 > frame pointer           = 0x28:0xfffffe0117fcf840 > code segment            = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b >                         = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 > processor eflags        = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process         = 0 (linuxkpi_short_wq_2) > trap number             = 12 > panic: page fault > cpuid = 0 > time = 1504630325 > KDB: stack backtrace: > #0 0xffffffff80abecf7 at kdb_backtrace+0x67 > #1 0xffffffff80a7b0bc at vpanic+0x19c > #2 0xffffffff80a7af13 at panic+0x43 > #3 0xffffffff80efc18d at trap_fatal+0x34d > #4 0xffffffff80efc1e9 at trap_pfault+0x49 > #5 0xffffffff80efba39 at trap+0x2a9 > #6 0xffffffff80edf0d1 at calltrap+0x8 > #7 0xffffffff8291cc44 at intel_fbdev_initial_config+0x14 > #8 0xffffffff82870957 at async_run_entry_fn+0x27 > #9 0xffffffff828641a0 at linux_work_fn+0xe0 > #10 0xffffffff80ad0667 at taskqueue_run_locked+0x147 > #11 0xffffffff80ad1848 at taskqueue_thread_loop+0xb8 > #12 0xffffffff80a3e4b5 at fork_exit+0x85 > #13 0xffffffff80edf6be at fork_trampoline+0xe > Uptime: 6s > Dumping 314 out of 3929 > MB:..6%..11%..21%..31%..41%..51%..62%..72%..82%..92% > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Shall I open a bug report? > I've filed this ticket in the drm-next Github project (I am running into this issue as well): https://github.com/FreeBSDDesktop/freebsd-base-graphics/issues/173 what is confusing to me is that i have been running drm-next world+kernel for ages without issues, so i suspect something is happening with how the modules are created via ports/pkgs versus when i buildworld/installworld on my systems. -p -- Pete Wright pete@nomadlogic.org @nomadlogicLA From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 17:12:05 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99805E133E9 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 17:12:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nbe@renzel.net) Received: from nijmegen.renzel.net (mx1.renzel.net [195.243.213.130]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.renzel.net", Issuer "renzel.net Root CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 323B474D35 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 17:12:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nbe@renzel.net) X-Virus-Scanned: GDATA Antivirus at gdata-milter.renzel.de.isb X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=7.0 tests=BAYES_00,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 Received: from dublin.vkf.isb.de.renzel.net (unknown [10.0.0.80]) by nijmegen.renzel.net (smtpd) with ESMTP id 78A27141481B; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:12:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from navigator.renzel.net (unknown [10.0.0.254]) by dublin.vkf.isb.de.renzel.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E6C184DDF; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:12:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from navigator.renzel.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by navigator.renzel.net (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v85HC0la022947; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:12:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nbe@renzel.net) Received: (from www@localhost) by navigator.renzel.net (8.14.9/8.14.5/Submit) id v85HC0IU022946; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:12:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nbe@renzel.net) To: Pete Wright Subject: Re: drm-next-kmod panic X-PHP-Originating-Script: 80:rcube.php Received: from dRKSldPhBPWuiFuxkY+TwJJkiC7Ze4dsQJE2LLJ7ExzMUbXaVkJ2Qw== (7N68vagM6hUqWXQ5aep81ZMxjtNZI9zY) by webmail.renzel.net with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Tue, 05 Sep 2017 19:12:00 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 19:12:00 +0200 From: Nils Beyer Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Organization: VKF Renzel GmbH In-Reply-To: <0d085613-cb55-c2e3-142f-93fc4fe388df@nomadlogic.org> References: <69456e0e-8b97-51fd-8a65-023ecb093cfd@nomadlogic.org> <0d085613-cb55-c2e3-142f-93fc4fe388df@nomadlogic.org> Message-ID: X-Sender: nbe@renzel.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on nijmegen.renzel.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 17:12:05 -0000 On 2017-09-05 18:43 CEST, Pete Wright wrote: > I've filed this ticket in the drm-next Github project (I am running into this issue as well): > https://github.com/FreeBSDDesktop/freebsd-base-graphics/issues/173 thank you - I've added my finding as well; still not completely sure if that problem more likely belongs to FreeBSD's bugtracker... From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 20:01:10 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23D18E1C658 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:01:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11CF7E217 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:01:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AABA4E1C652; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6693E1C650 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:01:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: from asp.reflexion.net (outbound-mail-210-90.reflexion.net [208.70.210.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3246C7E20B for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:01:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: (qmail 30749 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2017 19:56:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-cs-01.app.dca.reflexion.local) (10.81.19.1) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with SMTP; 5 Sep 2017 19:56:22 -0000 Received: by mail-cs-01.app.dca.reflexion.local (Reflexion email security v8.40.2) with SMTP; Tue, 05 Sep 2017 15:54:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 8028 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2017 19:54:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO iron2.pdx.net) (69.64.224.71) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 5 Sep 2017 19:54:27 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.109] (c-67-170-167-181.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.170.167.181]) by iron2.pdx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EFF64EC94DA; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 12:54:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: x11/pixman vs. clang 5 arm assembler handling: "error: unknown directive" and the like Message-Id: <5CAB42C9-984A-4BC9-A4CC-4BDD74932084@dsl-only.net> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 12:54:26 -0700 Cc: FreeBSD Toolchain To: freebsd-arm , x11@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD Ports X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 20:01:10 -0000 In an experiment with building some arm ports via poudriere cross building on amd64 I got the following. It appears that clang does not handle all the assembler notation and a different assembler might need to be used for x11/pixman . (The x11/pixman usage is indirect from having specified x11/lumina and x11/xscreensaver ). --- pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo --- /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=3Dcompile /nxb-bin/usr/bin/cc = -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 -O2 -pipe = -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -MT pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo = -MD -MP -MF .deps/pixman-arm-simd-asm.Tpo -c -o pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo = pixman-arm-simd-asm.S libtool: compile: /nxb-bin/usr/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. = -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 -O2 -pipe -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 -g -fno-strict-aliasing = -MT pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/pixman-arm-simd-asm.Tpo -c = pixman-arm-simd-asm.S -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/pixman-arm-simd-asm.o :1:1: error: unknown directive . . . --- pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo --- .func fname ^ ./pixman-arm-simd-asm.h:599:5: note: while in macro instantiation pixman_asm_function fname ^ /tmp/pixman-arm-simd-asm-b59328.s:910:1: note: while in macro = instantiation generate_composite_function pixman_composite_src_8888_8888_asm_armv6, = 32, 0, 32, FLAG_DST_WRITEONLY | FLAG_COND_EXEC | = FLAG_SPILL_LINE_VARS_WIDE | FLAG_PROCESS_PRESERVES_SCRATCH, 4, = blit_init, nop_macro, nop_macro, blit_process_head, nop_macro, = blit_inner_loop ^ ./pixman-arm-simd-asm.h:614:6: error: expected absolute expression .if prefetch_distance =3D=3D 0 ^ /tmp/pixman-arm-simd-asm-b59328.s:910:1: note: while in macro = instantiation generate_composite_function pixman_composite_src_8888_8888_asm_armv6, = 32, 0, 32, FLAG_DST_WRITEONLY | FLAG_COND_EXEC | = FLAG_SPILL_LINE_VARS_WIDE | FLAG_PROCESS_PRESERVES_SCRATCH, 4, = blit_init, nop_macro, nop_macro, blit_process_head, nop_macro, = blit_inner_loop ^ ./pixman-arm-simd-asm.h:620:6: error: expected absolute expression .if src_bpp =3D=3D 32 ^ . . . (I've omitted much later material continuing to reject notation.) (A variant build without the -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 usage got the same.) The context for the above is from a poudriere/qemu-user-static/native_xtools based cross build from amd64: poudriere jail -c -j zrFBSDx64CjailArmV7 -a arm.armv6 -x -m null -M = /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-armv7-installworld-poud -S /usr/src -v = 12.0-CURRENT poudriere bulk -j zrFBSDx64CjailArmV7 -w -f /root/armv7-origins.txt The -x use was enabled for -m null via: /usr/local/share/poudriere/jail.sh having a "build_native_xtools" added: null) JAILFS=3Dnone FCT=3Dbuild_native_xtools ;; # uname -apKU FreeBSD FreeBSDx64OPC 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT r323147M amd64 = amd64 1200043 1200043 /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-armv7-installworld-poud is from an arm/armv6 build of the same sources using -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 , installed via installworld distrib-dirs distribution DB_FROM_SRC=3D1 DESTDIR=3D. . . : # more ~/src.configs/src.conf.armv7-clang-bootstrap.amd64-host=20 TO_TYPE=3Darmv6 # KERNCONF=3DGENERIC-NODBG TARGET=3Darm .if ${.MAKE.LEVEL} =3D=3D 0 TARGET_ARCH=3D${TO_TYPE} .export TARGET_ARCH .endif # WITH_CROSS_COMPILER=3D WITHOUT_SYSTEM_COMPILER=3D # #CPUTYPE=3Dsoft WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS=3D WITH_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP=3D WITH_ELFTOOLCHAIN_BOOTSTRAP=3D WITH_CLANG_BOOTSTRAP=3D WITH_CLANG=3D WITH_CLANG_IS_CC=3D WITH_CLANG_FULL=3D WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS=3D WITH_LLD=3D # # Linking lldb fails for armv6(/v7) WITHOUT_LLDB=3D # WITH_BOOT=3D WITHOUT_LIB32=3D WITHOUT_LIBSOFT=3D # WITHOUT_GCC_BOOTSTRAP=3D WITHOUT_GCC=3D WITHOUT_GCC_IS_CC=3D WITHOUT_GNUCXX=3D # NO_WERROR=3D #WERROR=3D MALLOC_PRODUCTION=3D # WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD=3D WITH_DEBUG_FILES=3D # XCFLAGS+=3D -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 XCXXFLAGS+=3D -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 # There is no XCPPFLAGS but XCPP gets XCFLAGS content. The source variations are almost all for powerpc family explorations: # svnlite status /usr/src/ | sort ? /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC-DBG ? /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC-NODBG ? /usr/src/sys/arm/conf/GENERIC-DBG ? /usr/src/sys/arm/conf/GENERIC-NODBG ? /usr/src/sys/arm64/conf/GENERIC-DBG ? /usr/src/sys/arm64/conf/GENERIC-NODBG ? /usr/src/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERIC64vtsc-DBG ? /usr/src/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERIC64vtsc-NODBG ? /usr/src/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERICvtsc-DBG ? /usr/src/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERICvtsc-NODBG M /usr/src/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCFrameLowering.cpp M /usr/src/contrib/llvm/tools/lld/ELF/Arch/PPC64.cpp M /usr/src/crypto/openssl/crypto/armcap.c M /usr/src/lib/Makefile M /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_powerpc.c M /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_private.c M /usr/src/sys/boot/ofw/Makefile.inc M /usr/src/sys/boot/powerpc/Makefile.inc M /usr/src/sys/boot/powerpc/boot1.chrp/Makefile M /usr/src/sys/boot/powerpc/kboot/Makefile M /usr/src/sys/boot/uboot/Makefile.inc M /usr/src/sys/conf/kmod.mk M /usr/src/sys/conf/ldscript.powerpc M /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_pcpu.c M /usr/src/sys/powerpc/aim/mmu_oea64.c M /usr/src/sys/powerpc/ofw/ofw_machdep.c M /usr/src/sys/powerpc/powerpc/interrupt.c M /usr/src/sys/powerpc/powerpc/mp_machdep.c M /usr/src/sys/powerpc/powerpc/trap.c # svnlite info /usr/ports/ | grep "Re[plv]" Relative URL: ^/head Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 Revision: 449165 Last Changed Rev: 449165 # svnlite status /usr/ports/ | sort M /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk M /usr/ports/base/gcc/Makefile M /usr/ports/base/gcc/distinfo M /usr/ports/base/gcc/pkg-plist M /usr/ports/devel/libunwind/Makefile M /usr/ports/sysutils/cdrdao/Makefile # more /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf WANT_QT_VERBOSE_CONFIGURE=3D1 # DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dperl5=3D5.24 gcc=3D7 # # =46rom a local /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk extension: ALLOW_OPTIMIZATIONS_FOR_WITH_DEBUG=3D # .if ${.CURDIR:M*/devel/llvm*} #WITH_DEBUG=3D .elif ${.CURDIR:M*/www/webkit-qt5*} #WITH_DEBUG=3D .else WITH_DEBUG=3D .endif MALLOC_PRODUCTION=3D # more /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/zrFBSDx64CjailArmV7-make.conf = = =20 CFLAGS+=3D -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 CXXFLAGS+=3D -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 CPPFLAGS+=3D -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 As for that "ALLOW_OPTIMIZATIONS_FOR_WITH_DEBUG" I have in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk : STRIP_CMD=3D ${TRUE} .endif DEBUG_FLAGS?=3D -g +.if defined(ALLOW_OPTIMIZATIONS_FOR_WITH_DEBUG) +CFLAGS:=3D ${CFLAGS} ${DEBUG_FLAGS} +.else CFLAGS:=3D ${CFLAGS:N-O*:N-fno-strict*} ${DEBUG_FLAGS} +.endif .if defined(INSTALL_TARGET) INSTALL_TARGET:=3D ${INSTALL_TARGET:S/^install-strip$/install/g} .endif I've also had trouble in some contexts with where bad.port.mk uses ${UNAME} (empty string results) and so have forced the expected content to match the context that this is in: # Get the architecture .if !defined(ARCH) -ARCH!=3D ${UNAME} -p +ARCH!=3D echo amd64 .endif _EXPORTED_VARS+=3D ARCH =20 # Get the operating system type .if !defined(OPSYS) -OPSYS!=3D ${UNAME} -s +OPSYS!=3D echo FreeBSD .endif _EXPORTED_VARS+=3D OPSYS =20 .if !defined(_OSRELEASE) -_OSRELEASE!=3D ${UNAME} -r +_OSRELEASE!=3D echo 12.0-CURRENT .endif _EXPORTED_VARS+=3D _OSRELEASE =20 =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 20:13:15 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3128E1CF16 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:13:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86C9D80DF8 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:13:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 35E61E1CF12; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:13:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 344D1E1CF11; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:13:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1C0C80DEC; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 8CFB41DF04; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:13:11 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Mark Millard Cc: freebsd-arm , x11@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD Ports , FreeBSD Toolchain Subject: Re: x11/pixman vs. clang 5 arm assembler handling: "error: unknown directive" and the like References: <5CAB42C9-984A-4BC9-A4CC-4BDD74932084__24380.8804465973$1504641758$gmane$org@dsl-only.net> Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 22:13:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: <5CAB42C9-984A-4BC9-A4CC-4BDD74932084__24380.8804465973$1504641758$gmane$org@dsl-only.net> (Mark Millard's message of "Tue, 5 Sep 2017 12:54:26 -0700") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 20:13:16 -0000 Mark Millard writes: > In an experiment with building some arm ports via poudriere > cross building on amd64 I got the following. It appears that > clang does not handle all the assembler notation and a > different assembler might need to be used for x11/pixman . > (The x11/pixman usage is indirect from having specified > x11/lumina and x11/xscreensaver ). > > --- pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo --- > /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile /nxb-bin/usr/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -mcpu=cortex-a7 -O2 -pipe -mcpu=cortex-a7 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -MT pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/pixman-arm-simd-asm.Tpo -c -o pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo pixman-arm-simd-asm.S > libtool: compile: /nxb-bin/usr/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -mcpu=cortex-a7 -O2 -pipe -mcpu=cortex-a7 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -MT pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/pixman-arm-simd-asm.Tpo -c pixman-arm-simd-asm.S -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/pixman-arm-simd-asm.o > :1:1: error: unknown directive > . . . > --- pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo --- > .func fname > ^ Does it still happen after https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/449285 ? From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 20:33:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388D0E1DDE6 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:33:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D11181B for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:33:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6D6E6E1DDD9; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:33:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61152E1DDD6 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:33:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: from asp.reflexion.net (outbound-mail-210-90.reflexion.net [208.70.210.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 650C11807 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:33:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: (qmail 15437 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2017 20:33:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rtc-sm-01.app.dca.reflexion.local) (10.81.150.1) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with SMTP; 5 Sep 2017 20:33:07 -0000 Received: by rtc-sm-01.app.dca.reflexion.local (Reflexion email security v8.40.2) with SMTP; Tue, 05 Sep 2017 16:33:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 1764 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2017 20:33:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO iron2.pdx.net) (69.64.224.71) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 5 Sep 2017 20:33:07 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.109] (c-67-170-167-181.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.170.167.181]) by iron2.pdx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 818F8EC807E; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 13:33:06 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: x11/pixman vs. clang 5 arm assembler handling: "error: unknown directive" and the like From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 13:33:05 -0700 Cc: freebsd-arm , x11@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD Ports , FreeBSD Toolchain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8A60350E-0D95-4D47-A7E8-6AF1A7727A93@dsl-only.net> References: <5CAB42C9-984A-4BC9-A4CC-4BDD74932084__24380.8804465973$1504641758$gmane$org@dsl-only.net> To: Jan Beich X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 20:33:11 -0000 On 2017-Sep-5, at 1:13 PM, Jan Beich wrote: > Mark Millard writes: >=20 >> In an experiment with building some arm ports via poudriere >> cross building on amd64 I got the following. It appears that >> clang does not handle all the assembler notation and a >> different assembler might need to be used for x11/pixman . >> (The x11/pixman usage is indirect from having specified >> x11/lumina and x11/xscreensaver ). >>=20 >> --- pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo --- >> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=3Dcompile /nxb-bin/usr/bin/cc = -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 -O2 -pipe = -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -MT pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo = -MD -MP -MF .deps/pixman-arm-simd-asm.Tpo -c -o pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo = pixman-arm-simd-asm.S >> libtool: compile: /nxb-bin/usr/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. = -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 -O2 -pipe -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 -g -fno-strict-aliasing = -MT pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/pixman-arm-simd-asm.Tpo -c = pixman-arm-simd-asm.S -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/pixman-arm-simd-asm.o >> :1:1: error: unknown directive >> . . . >> --- pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo --- >> .func fname >> ^ >=20 > Does it still happen after = https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/449285 ? I'll let you know. But it will be a while for the results: I just started another build experiment with: poudriere bulk -j zrFBSDx64CjailArmV7 -w -c -f ~/armv7-origins.txt This is based on /usr/ports having -r449313 . (I updated based on your question.) It will likely take 2-4 hours to get that far in the 338 packages it is attempting to build. (I'm more experimenting with building than using the results currently. Previously my port builds were all native and via portmaster .) =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 21:38:47 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707A1E20740 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 21:38:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA717005F for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 21:38:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C5D8DE20739; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 21:38:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56E8E20738 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 21:38:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: from asp.reflexion.net (outbound-mail-210-90.reflexion.net [208.70.210.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD4647004E for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 21:38:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: (qmail 32169 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2017 21:38:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-cs-01.app.dca.reflexion.local) (10.81.19.1) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with SMTP; 5 Sep 2017 21:38:43 -0000 Received: by mail-cs-01.app.dca.reflexion.local (Reflexion email security v8.40.2) with SMTP; Tue, 05 Sep 2017 17:38:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 1499 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2017 21:38:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO iron2.pdx.net) (69.64.224.71) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 5 Sep 2017 21:38:43 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.109] (c-67-170-167-181.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.170.167.181]) by iron2.pdx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A5C0EC807E; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:38:42 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: x11/pixman vs. clang 5 arm assembler handling: "error: unknown directive" and the like From: Mark Millard In-Reply-To: <8A60350E-0D95-4D47-A7E8-6AF1A7727A93@dsl-only.net> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 14:38:41 -0700 Cc: freebsd-arm , FreeBSD Toolchain , x11@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD Ports Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3354A557-4707-40C1-916F-6E0C066A7A80@dsl-only.net> References: <5CAB42C9-984A-4BC9-A4CC-4BDD74932084__24380.8804465973$1504641758$gmane$org@dsl-only.net> <8A60350E-0D95-4D47-A7E8-6AF1A7727A93@dsl-only.net> To: Jan Beich X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 21:38:47 -0000 On 2017-Sep-5, at 1:33 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2017-Sep-5, at 1:13 PM, Jan Beich wrote: >=20 >> Mark Millard writes: >>=20 >>> In an experiment with building some arm ports via poudriere >>> cross building on amd64 I got the following. It appears that >>> clang does not handle all the assembler notation and a >>> different assembler might need to be used for x11/pixman . >>> (The x11/pixman usage is indirect from having specified >>> x11/lumina and x11/xscreensaver ). >>>=20 >>> --- pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo --- >>> /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=3Dcompile /nxb-bin/usr/bin/cc = -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 -O2 -pipe = -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 -g -fno-strict-aliasing -MT pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo = -MD -MP -MF .deps/pixman-arm-simd-asm.Tpo -c -o pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo = pixman-arm-simd-asm.S >>> libtool: compile: /nxb-bin/usr/bin/cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. = -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 -O2 -pipe -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 -g -fno-strict-aliasing = -MT pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/pixman-arm-simd-asm.Tpo -c = pixman-arm-simd-asm.S -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/pixman-arm-simd-asm.o >>> :1:1: error: unknown directive >>> . . . >>> --- pixman-arm-simd-asm.lo --- >>> .func fname >>> ^ >>=20 >> Does it still happen after = https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/449285 ? >=20 > . . . > This is based on /usr/ports having -r449313 . (I updated based on > your question.) > . . . The rebuild of the ports rebuilt x11/pixman earlier in the sequence than I had guessed so it took less time to get to that point: [00:51:26] [03] [00:00:00] Building x11/pixman | pixman-0.34.0 . . . [00:54:15] [03] [00:02:49] Finished x11/pixman | pixman-0.34.0: Success So -r449285 has avoided using clang's internal assembler. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Tue Sep 5 23:38:38 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122E1E0242A for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 23:38:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4AA269998 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 23:38:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AFE08E02425; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 23:38:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F43E02423 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 23:38:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: from asp.reflexion.net (outbound-mail-210-90.reflexion.net [208.70.210.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F40A69992 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 23:38:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: (qmail 13646 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2017 23:38:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO rtc-sm-01.app.dca.reflexion.local) (10.81.150.1) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with SMTP; 5 Sep 2017 23:38:34 -0000 Received: by rtc-sm-01.app.dca.reflexion.local (Reflexion email security v8.40.2) with SMTP; Tue, 05 Sep 2017 19:38:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 799 invoked from network); 5 Sep 2017 23:38:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO iron2.pdx.net) (69.64.224.71) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 5 Sep 2017 23:38:34 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.109] (c-67-170-167-181.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.170.167.181]) by iron2.pdx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 896F3EC807E; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:38:33 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: x11-toolkits/qt5-gui vs. arm.armv6 build via poudriere cross build: fails (undefined references) and odd mix of "clang++" vs. "/nxb-bin/usr/bin/c++" Message-Id: <4142F136-53C5-40CF-8B0A-BE68BC9EBFC6@dsl-only.net> Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 16:38:32 -0700 Cc: FreeBSD Toolchain To: freebsd-arm , x11@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD Ports X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 23:38:38 -0000 This is a bit odd so I give it in stages. The context is based on: poudriere jail -c -j zrFBSDx64CjailArmV7 -a arm.armv6 -x -m null -M = /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-armv7-installworld-poud -S /usr/src -v = 12.0-CURRENT poudriere bulk -j zrFBSDx64CjailArmV7 -w -f /root/armv7-origins.txt (More details given later.) First there is some unexpected use of (for example) clang++ instead of /nxb-bin/usr/bin/c++ . Then later I show some undefined references that make the build fail. For the clang++ vs. /nxb-bin/usr/bin/c++ there was (for example): --CONFIGURE_ENV-- = QMAKESPEC=3D"/usr/local/lib/qt5/mkspecs/freebsd-$(ccver=3D"$(/nxb-bin/usr/= bin/c++ --version)"; case "$ccver" in *clang*) echo clang ;; *) echo g++ = ;; esac)" MAKE=3D"make" QT_SELECT=3Dqt5 PKG_CONFIG=3Dpkgconf = XDG_DATA_HOME=3D/wrkdirs/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt5-gui/work = XDG_CONFIG_HOME=3D/wrkdirs/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt5-gui/work = HOME=3D/wrkdirs/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt5-gui/work TMPDIR=3D"/tmp" = SHELL=3D/bin/sh CONFIG_SHELL=3D/bin/sh --End CONFIGURE_ENV-- Note the expected use of /nxb-bin/usr/bin/c++ . There is also the later: ---Begin make.nxb.conf--- CC=3D/nxb-bin/usr/bin/cc CPP=3D/nxb-bin/usr/bin/cpp CXX=3D/nxb-bin/usr/bin/c++ AS=3D/nxb-bin/usr/bin/as NM=3D/nxb-bin/usr/bin/nm LD=3D/nxb-bin/usr/bin/ld OBJCOPY=3D/nxb-bin/usr/bin/objcopy SIZE=3D/nxb-bin/usr/bin/size STRIPBIN=3D/nxb-bin/usr/bin/strip SED=3D/nxb-bin/usr/bin/sed READELF=3D/nxb-bin/usr/bin/readelf RANLIB=3D/nxb-bin/usr/bin/ranlib YACC=3D/nxb-bin/usr/bin/yacc MAKE=3D/nxb-bin/usr/bin/make STRINGS=3D/nxb-bin/usr/bin/strings AWK=3D/nxb-bin/usr/bin/awk FLEX=3D/nxb-bin/usr/bin/flex ---End make.nxb.conf--- Yet for some reason x11-toolkits/qt5-gui reports using clang++ commands in config activity instead. For example: Running configuration tests... Determining architecture... () clang++ -c -pipe -g -Wall -W -fPIC -I. -I/usr/local/include = -I/usr/local/lib/qt5/mkspecs/freebsd-clang -o arch.o arch.cpp clang++ -o arch arch.o -L/usr/local/lib Found architecture in binary CFG_ARCH=3D"arm" CFG_CPUFEATURES=3D"" System architecture: 'arm' Host architecture: 'arm' clang++ -c -fvisibility=3Dhidden fvisibility.c clang++: warning: treating 'c' input as 'c++' when in C++ mode, this = behavior is deprecated [-Wdeprecated] Symbol visibility control enabled. clang++ -o libtest.so -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions -fPIC = bsymbolic_functions.c clang++: warning: treating 'c' input as 'c++' when in C++ mode, this = behavior is deprecated [-Wdeprecated] bsymbolic_functions.c:2:2: error: "Symbolic function binding on this = architecture may be broken, disabling it (see QTBUG-36129)." #error "Symbolic function binding on this architecture may be broken, = disabling it (see QTBUG-36129)." ^ 1 error generated. Symbolic function binding disabled. (I omit a lot more such "clang++" lines in the config stages of output. I did not see any /nxb-bin/usr/bin/c++ in that area.) Still it later reports: Configure summary Build type: /usr/local/lib/qt5/mkspecs/freebsd-clang (arm, CPU = features: none detected) qmake vars .......... QMAKE_CC =3D /nxb-bin/usr/bin/cc QMAKE_CXX =3D = /nxb-bin/usr/bin/c++ . . . It later uses the /nxb-bin/usr/bin/c* commands in the actual build. As for the build failure itself. . . --- ../../lib/libQt5Gui.so.5.7.1 --- rm -f libQt5Gui.so.5.7.1 libQt5Gui.so libQt5Gui.so.5 libQt5Gui.so.5.7 /nxb-bin/usr/bin/c++ -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--no-undefined = -Wl,--version-script,QtGui.version -Wl,--enable-new-dtags -pthread = -Wl,-rpath,/usr/local/lib/qt5 -shared -Wl,-soname,libQt5Gui.so.5 -o = libQt5Gui.so.5.7.1 .obj/qaccessible.o . . . fails with: .obj/qimage.o: In function `_ZL10qt_memfillIjEvPT_S0_i': = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt5-gui/work/qtbase-opensource-src-5.7.1/s= rc/gui/../../include/QtGui/5.7.1/QtGui/private/../../../../../src/gui/pain= ting/qdrawhelper_p.h:803: undefined reference to `qt_memfill32(unsigned = int*, unsigned int, int)' = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt5-gui/work/qtbase-opensource-src-5.7.1/s= rc/gui/../../include/QtGui/5.7.1/QtGui/private/../../../../../src/gui/pain= ting/qdrawhelper_p.h:803: undefined reference to `qt_memfill32(unsigned = int*, unsigned int, int)' .obj/qimage_conversions.o:(.data+0x524): undefined reference to = `convert_RGB888_to_RGB32_neon(QImageData*, QImageData const*, = QFlags)' .obj/qimage_conversions.o:(.data+0x528): undefined reference to = `convert_RGB888_to_RGB32_neon(QImageData*, QImageData const*, = QFlags)' .obj/qimage_conversions.o:(.data+0x52c): undefined reference to = `convert_RGB888_to_RGB32_neon(QImageData*, QImageData const*, = QFlags)' .obj/qcompositionfunctions.o: In function `_ZL10qt_memfillIjEvPT_S0_i': = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt5-gui/work/qtbase-opensource-src-5.7.1/s= rc/gui/../../include/QtGui/5.7.1/QtGui/private/../../../../../src/gui/pain= ting/qdrawhelper_p.h:803: undefined reference to `qt_memfill32(unsigned = int*, unsigned int, int)' . . . (I've omitted a lot more such notices of undefined references.) The context for all the above is from a poudriere/qemu-user-static/native_xtools based cross build from amd64: poudriere jail -c -j zrFBSDx64CjailArmV7 -a arm.armv6 -x -m null -M = /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-armv7-installworld-poud -S /usr/src -v = 12.0-CURRENT poudriere bulk -j zrFBSDx64CjailArmV7 -w -f /root/armv7-origins.txt The -x use was enabled for -m null via: /usr/local/share/poudriere/jail.sh having a "build_native_xtools" added: null) JAILFS=3Dnone FCT=3Dbuild_native_xtools ;; # uname -apKU FreeBSD FreeBSDx64OPC 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT r323147M amd64 = amd64 1200043 1200043 /usr/obj/DESTDIRs/clang-armv7-installworld-poud is from an arm/armv6 build of the same sources using -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 , installed via installworld distrib-dirs distribution DB_FROM_SRC=3D1 DESTDIR=3D. . . : # more ~/src.configs/src.conf.armv7-clang-bootstrap.amd64-host=20 TO_TYPE=3Darmv6 # KERNCONF=3DGENERIC-NODBG TARGET=3Darm .if ${.MAKE.LEVEL} =3D=3D 0 TARGET_ARCH=3D${TO_TYPE} .export TARGET_ARCH .endif # WITH_CROSS_COMPILER=3D WITHOUT_SYSTEM_COMPILER=3D # #CPUTYPE=3Dsoft WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS=3D WITH_BINUTILS_BOOTSTRAP=3D WITH_ELFTOOLCHAIN_BOOTSTRAP=3D WITH_CLANG_BOOTSTRAP=3D WITH_CLANG=3D WITH_CLANG_IS_CC=3D WITH_CLANG_FULL=3D WITH_CLANG_EXTRAS=3D WITH_LLD=3D # # Linking lldb fails for armv6(/v7) WITHOUT_LLDB=3D # WITH_BOOT=3D WITHOUT_LIB32=3D WITHOUT_LIBSOFT=3D # WITHOUT_GCC_BOOTSTRAP=3D WITHOUT_GCC=3D WITHOUT_GCC_IS_CC=3D WITHOUT_GNUCXX=3D # NO_WERROR=3D #WERROR=3D MALLOC_PRODUCTION=3D # WITH_REPRODUCIBLE_BUILD=3D WITH_DEBUG_FILES=3D # XCFLAGS+=3D -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 XCXXFLAGS+=3D -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 # There is no XCPPFLAGS but XCPP gets XCFLAGS content. The source variations are almost all for powerpc family explorations: # svnlite status /usr/src/ | sort ? /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC-DBG ? /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/GENERIC-NODBG ? /usr/src/sys/arm/conf/GENERIC-DBG ? /usr/src/sys/arm/conf/GENERIC-NODBG ? /usr/src/sys/arm64/conf/GENERIC-DBG ? /usr/src/sys/arm64/conf/GENERIC-NODBG ? /usr/src/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERIC64vtsc-DBG ? /usr/src/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERIC64vtsc-NODBG ? /usr/src/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERICvtsc-DBG ? /usr/src/sys/powerpc/conf/GENERICvtsc-NODBG M /usr/src/contrib/llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCFrameLowering.cpp M /usr/src/contrib/llvm/tools/lld/ELF/Arch/PPC64.cpp M /usr/src/crypto/openssl/crypto/armcap.c M /usr/src/lib/Makefile M /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_powerpc.c M /usr/src/lib/libkvm/kvm_private.c M /usr/src/sys/boot/ofw/Makefile.inc M /usr/src/sys/boot/powerpc/Makefile.inc M /usr/src/sys/boot/powerpc/boot1.chrp/Makefile M /usr/src/sys/boot/powerpc/kboot/Makefile M /usr/src/sys/boot/uboot/Makefile.inc M /usr/src/sys/conf/kmod.mk M /usr/src/sys/conf/ldscript.powerpc M /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_pcpu.c M /usr/src/sys/powerpc/aim/mmu_oea64.c M /usr/src/sys/powerpc/ofw/ofw_machdep.c M /usr/src/sys/powerpc/powerpc/interrupt.c M /usr/src/sys/powerpc/powerpc/mp_machdep.c M /usr/src/sys/powerpc/powerpc/trap.c # svnlite info /usr/ports/ | grep "Re[plv]" Relative URL: ^/head Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports Repository UUID: 35697150-7ecd-e111-bb59-0022644237b5 Revision: 449313 Last Changed Rev: 449313 # svnlite status /usr/ports/ | sort M /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk M /usr/ports/base/gcc/Makefile M /usr/ports/base/gcc/distinfo M /usr/ports/base/gcc/pkg-plist M /usr/ports/devel/libunwind/Makefile M /usr/ports/sysutils/cdrdao/Makefile # more /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf WANT_QT_VERBOSE_CONFIGURE=3D1 # DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3Dperl5=3D5.24 gcc=3D7 # # =46rom a local /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk extension: ALLOW_OPTIMIZATIONS_FOR_WITH_DEBUG=3D # .if ${.CURDIR:M*/devel/llvm*} #WITH_DEBUG=3D .elif ${.CURDIR:M*/www/webkit-qt5*} #WITH_DEBUG=3D .else WITH_DEBUG=3D .endif MALLOC_PRODUCTION=3D # more /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/zrFBSDx64CjailArmV7-make.conf = =20 CFLAGS+=3D -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 CXXFLAGS+=3D -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 CPPFLAGS+=3D -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 As for that "ALLOW_OPTIMIZATIONS_FOR_WITH_DEBUG" I have in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk : STRIP_CMD=3D ${TRUE} .endif DEBUG_FLAGS?=3D -g +.if defined(ALLOW_OPTIMIZATIONS_FOR_WITH_DEBUG) +CFLAGS:=3D ${CFLAGS} ${DEBUG_FLAGS} +.else CFLAGS:=3D ${CFLAGS:N-O*:N-fno-strict*} ${DEBUG_FLAGS} +.endif .if defined(INSTALL_TARGET) INSTALL_TARGET:=3D ${INSTALL_TARGET:S/^install-strip$/install/g} .endif I've also had trouble in some contexts where bad.port.mk uses ${UNAME} (empty string results) and so have forced the expected content to match the context that this is in a couple of the places: # Get the operating system type .if !defined(OPSYS) -OPSYS!=3D ${UNAME} -s +OPSYS!=3D echo FreeBSD .endif _EXPORTED_VARS+=3D OPSYS .if !defined(_OSRELEASE) -_OSRELEASE!=3D ${UNAME} -r +_OSRELEASE!=3D echo 12.0-CURRENT .endif _EXPORTED_VARS+=3D _OSRELEASE =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Wed Sep 6 09:40:41 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AE2E1D82F for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:40:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 872366A67C for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7D20CE1D828; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:40:40 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799F5E1D827 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: from asp.reflexion.net (outbound-mail-210-90.reflexion.net [208.70.210.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFCBB6A66C for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:40:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: (qmail 27800 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2017 09:45:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-cs-01.app.dca.reflexion.local) (10.81.19.1) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with SMTP; 6 Sep 2017 09:45:58 -0000 Received: by mail-cs-01.app.dca.reflexion.local (Reflexion email security v8.40.2) with SMTP; Wed, 06 Sep 2017 05:40:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 14827 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2017 09:40:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO iron2.pdx.net) (69.64.224.71) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 6 Sep 2017 09:40:37 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.109] (c-67-170-167-181.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.170.167.181]) by iron2.pdx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF7E1EC926D; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 02:40:36 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Could someone see about possibly applying the patch(s) from bugzilla 216816 so arm qt5 builds can work? (includes patching bsd.qt.mk) Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2017 02:40:36 -0700 References: Cc: mmel@freebsd.org, mikael.urankar@gmail.com, tcberner@freebsd.org, mi@ALDAN.algebra.com To: FreeBSD Toolchain , freebsd-arm , x11@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD Ports Message-Id: <4886EB2D-3F85-4DC9-954A-99B874334ADB@dsl-only.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 09:40:41 -0000 The patches mentioned below have been in bugzilla 216816 since 2017-Feb-05 but no one has applied them. The author of the patches reports below having a poudriere build log showing a successful build for x11-toolkits/qt5-gui . (My older bugzilla report 206348 was about qt5-gui specifically.) Could someone see about applying some variation of the patches so arm builds of such things are no longer blocked? FYI: Part of the context here is use of -mcpu=3Dcortex-a7 and the like. > From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org > Subject: [Bug 216816] [PATCH] devel/qt5: In arch.test, use CXXFLAGS = from make environment > Date: September 6, 2017 at 1:31:47 AM PDT > To: >=20 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216816 >=20 > --- Comment #8 from Michal Meloun --- > This patch affects many (if not all) of qt5 ports, so you must rebuild = all of > them.=20 > In any case, I can build qt5-gui without problem: > = http://build.humusoft.cz/data/head12armv7-default/2017-03-11_19h10m04s/log= s/qt5-gui-5.7.1.log >=20 > --=20 > You are receiving this mail because: > You are on the CC list for the bug. Note: Bugzilla 206348 and 217278 are also reports of the problem(s), noted as duplicates of the bugzilla that has the patches at this point. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Wed Sep 6 10:51:28 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC86CE208C7 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7947F7E3D4 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 732CBE208C0; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BFAE208BF for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11A6E7E3CB for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v86ApRvn075225 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:51:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 222098] graphics/mesa-dri 17.1.8: fails to build Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 10:51:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rozhuk.im@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter flagtypes.name Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 10:51:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222098 Bug ID: 222098 Summary: graphics/mesa-dri 17.1.8: fails to build Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: x11@FreeBSD.org Reporter: rozhuk.im@gmail.com Flags: maintainer-feedback?(x11@FreeBSD.org) Assignee: x11@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD rimwks 11.1-STABLE FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE #0 r322996M: Wed Aug 30 00:0= 8:18 MSK 2017 root@rimwks:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RIMWKSx64 amd64 ... checking for RADEON... yes checking for RADEON... yes checking for RADEON... yes checking for AMDGPU... no configure: error: Package requirements (libdrm >=3D 2.4.79 libdrm_amdgpu >= =3D 2.4.79) were not met: Package 'libdrm_amdgpu', required by 'virtual:world', not found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables AMDGPU_CFLAGS and AMDGPU_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. =3D=3D=3D> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to x11@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach the "/tmp/ports/usr/ports/graphics/mesa-dri/work/mesa-17.1.8/config.log" includ= ing the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good id= ea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. a /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static info -g -Ea). *** Error code 1 Same issue as: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221881 looks like some one drops support FreeBSD 11.x --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Wed Sep 6 10:51:28 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DA5E208C6 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83B6D7E3D6 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4AD14E208BE; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6ADE208BD for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBF387E3C5 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:51:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v86ApRvj075225 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:51:27 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 222098] graphics/mesa-dri 17.1.8: fails to build Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 10:51:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Type: request X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 10:51:29 -0000 rozhuk.im@gmail.com has reassigned Bugzilla Automation 's request for maintainer-feedback to x11@FreeBSD.org: Bug 222098: graphics/mesa-dri 17.1.8: fails to build https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222098 --- Description --- FreeBSD rimwks 11.1-STABLE FreeBSD 11.1-STABLE #0 r322996M: Wed Aug 30 00:0= 8:18 MSK 2017 root@rimwks:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RIMWKSx64 amd64 ... checking for RADEON... yes checking for RADEON... yes checking for RADEON... yes checking for AMDGPU... no configure: error: Package requirements (libdrm >=3D 2.4.79 libdrm_amdgpu >= =3D 2.4.79) were not met: Package 'libdrm_amdgpu', required by 'virtual:world', not found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables AMDGPU_CFLAGS and AMDGPU_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. =3D=3D=3D> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to x11@FreeBSD.org [maintainer] and attach the "/tmp/ports/usr/ports/graphics/mesa-dri/work/mesa-17.1.8/config.log" includ= ing the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good id= ea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. a /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static info -g -Ea). *** Error code 1 Same issue as: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221881 looks like some one drops support FreeBSD 11.x From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Wed Sep 6 18:33:15 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9CE8E104DF for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:33:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C9382F20 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:33:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7B00CE104D6; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:33:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A968E104D5 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:33:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB4BB82F17 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:33:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v86IXEbL046969 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:33:14 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 222098] graphics/mesa-dri 17.1.8: fails to build Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 18:33:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: rozhuk.im@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_severity Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 18:33:16 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222098 rozhuk.im@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Many People --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Wed Sep 6 18:58:06 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658E6E112B3 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:58:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22D7B3D03 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:58:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 19407E112B1; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D5BE112B0 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:58:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E56963CFD for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:58:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v86Iw3h3001981 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 18:58:05 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221881] graphics/libdrm upfate to 2.4.83,1 failed ('uve_ib.h' file not found) Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 18:58:03 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: pi@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 18:58:06 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221881 Kurt Jaeger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pi@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #9 from Kurt Jaeger --- testbuild on 11.1a in poudriere was sucessful. Can you try to build in poudriere ? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Wed Sep 6 19:00:22 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70BF8E114A9 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06EDB638DE for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:00:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DAC46E114A8; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:00:21 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC52E114A7 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:00:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69BD3638D6 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:00:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v86J0KFn010824 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:00:21 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221881] graphics/libdrm upfate to 2.4.83,1 failed ('uve_ib.h' file not found) Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:00:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:00:22 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221881 --- Comment #10 from Jan Beich --- (In reply to Kurt Jaeger from comment #9) Try to add BUILD_DEPENDS +=3D cunit>0:devel/cunit in order to reproduce. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Wed Sep 6 19:13:08 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1C9E11F13 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:13:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF236685B for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:13:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 57328E11F12; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C24E11F11 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:13:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E12066857 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:13:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v86JD78R066334 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:13:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 222098] graphics/mesa-dri 17.1.8: fails to build Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:13:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:13:09 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222098 --- Comment #1 from Jan Beich --- Probably caused by attachment 185926 which disabled libdrm_amdgpu. Rather t= han a regression such a configuration is simply not supported yet. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Wed Sep 6 19:19:29 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32046E121B5 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:19:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AE667BBD for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:19:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8A600E121AD; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:19:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CFEE121AA for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:19:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C96A67BB0 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:19:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v86JJRZY075693 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:19:28 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221881] graphics/libdrm: 2.4.83, 1 fails to build if devel/cunit is installed Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:19:27 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: see_also rep_platform bug_severity keywords short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:19:29 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221881 Jan Beich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.freedesktop.or | |g/show_bug.cgi?id=3D102391 Hardware|amd64 |Any Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People Keywords| |regression Summary|graphics/libdrm upfate to |graphics/libdrm: 2.4.83,1 |2.4.83,1 failed ('uve_ib.h' |fails to build if |file not found) |devel/cunit is installed --- Comment #11 from Jan Beich --- Example poudriere log: http://sprunge.us/aIDR (10.3 i386) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Wed Sep 6 19:26:34 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEEEE1281C for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:26:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB3C569BA2 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:26:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A5D1EE1281B; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:26:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A53FFE1281A for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:26:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78DBF69B9B for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:26:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v86JQWSK093409 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:26:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221881] graphics/libdrm: 2.4.83, 1 fails to build if devel/cunit is installed Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:26:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: pi@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:26:34 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221881 --- Comment #12 from Kurt Jaeger --- Yes, adding a build-dep on devel/cunit causes the failure. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Wed Sep 6 19:30:46 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9283DE12C21 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:30:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C6B6AB24 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:30:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0559DE12C19; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F33E12C18 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:30:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45ED26AB17 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:30:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v86JUiPO000338 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:30:44 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221881] graphics/libdrm: 2.4.83, 1 fails to build if devel/cunit is installed Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:30:44 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:30:46 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221881 --- Comment #13 from Jan Beich --- There several ways to fix build: - Mark as CONFLICTS_BUILD =3D cunit - Force-disable cunit in configure - Add uve_ib.h to DISTFILES - Wait for libdrm-2.4.84 Some of those are covered by portmgr blanket but without coordinating with = the maintainer the fix can end up as cruft on the next update. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Wed Sep 6 19:41:15 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89911E13287 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:41:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F14E6CDE9 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:41:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E244CE13286; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CF5E13285 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:41:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67F336CDE2 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:41:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v86JfDkJ031273 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 19:41:13 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 222098] graphics/mesa-dri 17.1.8: fails to build Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:41:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: rozhuk.im@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:41:15 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222098 --- Comment #2 from rozhuk.im@gmail.com --- But I have no amdgpu on FreeBSD 11, it is not backported as I know. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Wed Sep 6 21:43:13 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDBA8E18CC3 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 21:43:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287FF6714C for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 21:43:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 19CB1E18CC2; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 21:43:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19591E18CC1 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 21:43:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D02B067148 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 21:43:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v86LhCPB007781 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 21:43:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220982] graphics/mesa-dri: update to 17.2.0 Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 21:43:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, patch-ready X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: greg@unrelenting.technology X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 21:43:14 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220982 Greg V changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |greg@unrelenting.technology --- Comment #11 from Greg V --- Starting Xorg with 17.2.0 (this "release" patch + Vulkan patch) on amdgpu (Radeon RX 480, 12-CURRENT built today (git rev b2f0b570ad4), drm-next-kmod port) results in glitch art instead of display output and the following text repeatedly spammed into console: .AMDGPU.config is empty! radeonsi: cannot read an ELF shader binary LLVM failed to compile shader Works fine on Intel Haswell though. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Wed Sep 6 21:52:05 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF31E19469 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 21:52:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C624C6958A for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 21:52:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B6BDDE19468; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 21:52:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5B41E19467 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 21:52:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67F1469581 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 21:52:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v86Lq4Yh031181 for ; Wed, 6 Sep 2017 21:52:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221540] graphics/mesa-dri: enable Vulkan drivers Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 21:52:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: greg@unrelenting.technology X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2017 21:52:05 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221540 Greg V changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |greg@unrelenting.technology --- Comment #1 from Greg V --- Yay! Got the demo cube spinning on my RX 480! (as I mentioned in 220982, OpenGL/Xorg doesn't work for me on 17.2.0, so I currently have 17.1.7 and O= NLY Vulkan and VDPAU from the 17.2.0 build) vulkaninfo output: https://gist.github.com/myfreeweb/eca206a059eb396ec23c47f211ddbe58 My WIP patch for the Vulkan ICD loader and stuff: https://github.com/myfreeweb/Vulkan-LoaderAndValidationLayers/tree/freebsd (validation layers don't compile yet) On Intel Haswell, it doesn't work, just says that the implementation is incomplete for Haswell. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Thu Sep 7 04:40:59 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED33E05AB8 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 04:40:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5808497B for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 04:40:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D5086E05AB7; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 04:40:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF05DE05AB6 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 04:40:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 714ED84973 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 04:40:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v874eve1004326 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 04:40:58 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220982] graphics/mesa-dri: update to 17.2.0 Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 04:40:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, patch-ready X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 04:40:59 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220982 --- Comment #12 from Jan Beich --- (In reply to Greg V from comment #11) > .AMDGPU.config is empty! > radeonsi: cannot read an ELF shader binary > LLVM failed to compile shader Not sure why mesa-dri-17.1.7 works fine for you despite https://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=3Dc968de198902 Can you try reverting that commit? Can you try reverting graphics/mesa-dri/files/patch-src_util_build__id.c ? Can you check if MESA_LLVM_VER=3D39 is affected as well? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Thu Sep 7 15:48:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7BBE00815 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:48:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33FDD6D782 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:48:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 215D4E00813; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20F4BE00812 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:48:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9D796D779 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:48:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v87FmAtN096906 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:48:10 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220982] graphics/mesa-dri: update to 17.2.0 Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 15:48:11 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, patch-ready X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: greg@unrelenting.technology X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 15:48:11 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220982 --- Comment #13 from Greg V --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #12) MESA_LLVM_VER=3D39, MESA_LLVM_VER=3D-devel =E2=80=94 same problem. Revertin= g that commit results in a black screen and then terminal instead of Xorg. Also just built 17.1.8 from ports=E2=80=A6 same problem! So it's not 17.2.0= related. Probably some weird incompatibility between downloaded pkgs and ports built= on my machine=E2=80=A6 I've had that kind of issue with Intel in the past. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Thu Sep 7 17:59:35 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6FACE05810 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FA2868579 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 99962E0580F; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99252E0580E for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:59:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02AA568572 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:59:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v87HxY64045898 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 17:59:34 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220982] graphics/mesa-dri: update to 17.2.0 Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 17:59:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, patch-ready X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: greg@unrelenting.technology X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 17:59:36 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220982 --- Comment #14 from Greg V --- (In reply to Greg V from comment #13) Okay, so there is some weird problem with builds on my desktop. 17.1.7 built here also glitches. Took 17.2.0+Vulkan packages built on my laptop and copied them to the deskt= op =E2=80=94 it works! --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Thu Sep 7 20:06:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E491BE0C9A1 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 20:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19124638F0 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 20:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 06255E0C99E; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 20:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031FCE0C99D for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 20:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F749638E0 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 20:06:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v87K6FGV047926 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 20:06:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221540] graphics/mesa-dri: enable Vulkan drivers Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 20:06:16 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: greg@unrelenting.technology X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 20:06:18 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221540 --- Comment #2 from Greg V --- With the properly built 17.2.0 packages, the Dolphin Emulator successfully plays The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker on Vulkan with the RADV driver! T= his is the year of FreeBSD on the desktop :D https://i.imgur.com/kJgyAX2.jpg --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Thu Sep 7 21:04:50 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A81E0FA63 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 21:04:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0058710D4 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 21:04:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9BE20E0FA61; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 21:04:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B77BE0FA60 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 21:04:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79FD1710CF for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 21:04:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v87L4nqb078295 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 21:04:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221160] x11/xdm: change install paths Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 21:04:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: melanhit@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback+ X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 21:04:50 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221160 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Romanenko --- xdm by default looks for /usr/local/etc/X11/xdm/xdm-config, this can be cha= nged by -config option. because previous xdm config path is deprecated - xdm section in the handbook and /usr/ports/UPDATING are still need updating --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Sep 8 06:56:12 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3BF8E07A43 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 06:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dch@skunkwerks.at) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4541E6F9B3 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 06:56:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dch@skunkwerks.at) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886F8211D7 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 02:56:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web6 ([10.202.2.216]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 08 Sep 2017 02:56:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=skunkwerks.at; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=eyjRtpOX82CmXlJctPtMqizw7E u1W1I1oV3UBT4gMHc=; b=O2AACZcnDjQ4h9ju45xOiR7TNSJTmSy+BST5fsVCp7 6GJWeVREym1d8PJmhTHN8FfLwrxXVRkiDD0kQLDlX0dX9kKMQzyjEk1N0/eDHLhg 4d87fdR4cZkr3G+D1hYbuF4m90sAwjSCnAlawuXbGJi236VAYizXXEB1FXq3yIAx 0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=eyjRtp OX82CmXlJctPtMqizw7Eu1W1I1oV3UBT4gMHc=; b=T9ALgyUVri3qMBWbR3HjKo UbBFRtu0NHxNMOCVDTTgvnmSfVfwGEqQfztZ8OjwlNBYF3bxN+unGH+o3Y6kVH2b SEEgokJhcIrlLetfOhTxH8nAJkTHwioGh1sKef4fjDLv/yLXLJUQA4YebAw3qzHB 0kBfW9uZ0rA6mCf2TQh/XI6rnJvcoEBUA3iXXcHk8Xl+0Yu8Dvmti8iJlidGBSvA /dUDOyz2JYnsghI0FbXxvt/cqkuEkZMNHPWb3QSVmH/qNDPpYxMH/d7N6hJ59K/u cbC2HjWLnetVCNUxwRf0ZgSRbrQEvnfKWc1gmrcC8KmPLkEZVNPnbkiA/3vnfoSQ == X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 5E7E648001; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 02:56:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1504853770.1095290.1099207528.6B708473@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Dave Cottlehuber To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-973d3087 In-Reply-To: <24216593-f788-5280-7801-12bf5b2a6c05@abinet.ru> Subject: Re: Synaptics Issues Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 08:56:10 +0200 References: <393ee3b1-14c1-3a74-21c7-ef2557aa448c@nomadlogic.org> <24216593-f788-5280-7801-12bf5b2a6c05@abinet.ru> X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 06:56:12 -0000 On Sun, 3 Sep 2017, at 20:43, abi wrote: > Well, synaptics is not working for me at all (Dell XPS 13 Skylake). It > loads, but produces a lot of spam in xorg log, mouse jumping randomly. > It works as sysmouse. So, I think yes, Xorg or FreeBSD has something > fishy with synaptics. Personally, I'm waiting for evdev or libinput > support, so I disabled touchpad. I've got an XPS13 Kaby Lake model touchpad works well enough for me using freebsddesktop/drm-next branch since months. I haven't tweaked the xorg setting much yet but its definitely usable. I tried it with moused_enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf and it is unusable. relevant settings below. # /boot/loader.conf hw.psm.synaptics_support=1 # /etc/rc.conf.d/moused actually not required moused_enable=NO # /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/touchpad.conf Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5 6 7" Option "LeftEdge" "100" Option "RightEdge" "1120" Option "TopEdge" "50" Option "BottomEdge" "310" Option "FingerLow" "25" Option "FingerHigh" "30" Option "MaxTapTime" "180" Option "MaxTapMove" "220" Option "MaxDoubleTapTime" "180" Option "VertScrollDelta" "20" Option "HorizScrollDelta" "50" Option "MinSpeed" "0.79" Option "MaxSpeed" "0.88" Option "AccelFactor" "0.0015" Option "SHMConfig" "on" EndSection I believe most of the above came out of https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/50170/ and https://www.tomek.cedro.info/freebsd-synaptics-trackpadtouchpad/ has some info on 2 finger scrolling but I'm largely a keyboard user so haven't progressed further. A+ Dave From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Fri Sep 8 09:09:49 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD694E0C575 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 09:09:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54BF56B4B2 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 09:09:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4A1FAE0C574; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 09:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44240E0C573 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 09:09:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8A256B4AC for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 09:09:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v8899mKR005486 for ; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 09:09:48 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v8899mOI005479; Fri, 8 Sep 2017 09:09:48 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201709080909.v8899mOI005479@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2017 09:09:48 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: x11@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Sep 2017 09:09:50 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/x11@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ x11/libinput | 1.6.0 | 1.8.2 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sat Sep 9 08:50:43 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDEEE09DC5 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 08:50:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480DECAB for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 08:50:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 477D1E09DC4; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 08:50:43 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472DCE09DC3 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 08:50:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38594CAA for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 08:50:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v898ohBQ085946 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 08:50:43 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v898ohui085945; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 08:50:43 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201709090850.v898ohui085945@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2017 08:50:43 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: x11@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 08:50:43 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/x11@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati | 7.9.0 | 7.10.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sat Sep 9 09:37:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BABD5E0BEBC for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1CCC24CE for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9E2C4E0BEBB; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:37:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB20E0BEBA for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88D2224CD for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:37:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v899bE79044103 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:37:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221881] graphics/libdrm: 2.4.83, 1 fails to build if devel/cunit is installed Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 09:37:14 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: rozhuk.im@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.isobsolete attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 09:37:17 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221881 rozhuk.im@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #185926|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #14 from rozhuk.im@gmail.com --- Created attachment 186191 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D186191&action= =3Dedit Force-disable cunit, rename amdgpu_Makefile.am -> patch-amdgpu_Makefile.am (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #13) > Force-disable cunit in configure I prefer this. With patch build and make package ok --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sat Sep 9 09:37:38 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D132CE0BF09 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:37:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B904A2516 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:37:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B8527E0BF08; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7EEAE0BF06 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:37:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A65D92515 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:37:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v899bbr3044696 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:37:38 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221881] graphics/libdrm: 2.4.83, 1 fails to build if devel/cunit is installed Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 09:37:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: rozhuk.im@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: blocked Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 09:37:38 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221881 rozhuk.im@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |222098 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222098 [Bug 222098] graphics/mesa-dri 17.1.8: fails to build --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sat Sep 9 09:37:37 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56C5E0BEFF for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1E5250D for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CC8CFE0BEFD; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:37:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2A8E0BEFC for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA91D250C for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v899bbqn044696 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:37:37 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 222098] graphics/mesa-dri 17.1.8: fails to build Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 09:37:38 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: rozhuk.im@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: dependson Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 09:37:38 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222098 rozhuk.im@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |221881 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221881 [Bug 221881] graphics/libdrm: 2.4.83,1 fails to build if devel/cunit is installed --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sat Sep 9 09:49:30 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10303E0C815 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:49:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB5622CE4 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:49:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E75B4E0C814; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F60E0C813 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:49:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D51BC2CE3 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:49:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v899nTA0070185 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 09:49:29 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 222098] graphics/mesa-dri 17.1.8: fails to build Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 09:49:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: rozhuk.im@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed X-Bugzilla-Resolution: Works As Intended X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_severity bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 09:49:30 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222098 rozhuk.im@gmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Affects Many People |Affects Only Me Status|New |Closed Resolution|--- |Works As Intended --- Comment #3 from rozhuk.im@gmail.com --- (In reply to Jan Beich from comment #1) Sorry, you was right. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sat Sep 9 11:36:25 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463E8E111F4 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:36:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE5C654F8 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:36:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2B5F3E111F3; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:36:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AFEFE111F1 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:36:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 196FE654F7 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:36:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v89BaOUe067026 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:36:24 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 222031] x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati: No accelerated rendering Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 11:36:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: alexander_klein_uni@web.de X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 11:36:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222031 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Klein --- Just to be absolutely sure that the problem is not related to the driver be= ing loaded too early, I removed the line from /boot/loader.conf, and instead lo= ad the driver in /etc/rc.conf via kld_list now, but nothing changed. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sat Sep 9 11:37:58 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD2EE112F9 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03EE565559 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 031CCE112F8; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:37:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B51E112F6 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4F7465558 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:37:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v89BbvU0069095 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:37:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 222031] x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati: No accelerated rendering Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 11:37:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: alexander_klein_uni@web.de X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 11:37:58 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222031 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Klein --- Created attachment 186194 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D186194&action= =3Dedit Output of devinfo --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sat Sep 9 11:38:31 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0AFEE11381 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B88655AC for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 87E5FE11380; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:38:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8790AE1137F for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 759DA655AB for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v89BcVPx069895 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 11:38:31 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 222031] x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati: No accelerated rendering Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 11:38:31 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: alexander_klein_uni@web.de X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 11:38:31 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D222031 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Klein --- Created attachment 186195 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D186195&action= =3Dedit Output of pciconf --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sat Sep 9 19:47:08 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23AABE05842 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 19:47:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AFC575F2F for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 19:47:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 07420E05840; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 19:47:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06C24E0583F for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 19:47:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9A3175F2E for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 19:47:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v89Jl7PK082172 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 19:47:07 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 221540] graphics/mesa-dri: enable Vulkan drivers Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 19:47:08 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa, patch X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: greg@unrelenting.technology X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 19:47:08 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D221540 --- Comment #3 from Greg V --- I made ports for the Vulkan loader and stuff: bug 222175 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sat Sep 9 20:25:12 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB7AE07FFA for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 20:25:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82DCD7C4AE for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 20:25:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7F12CE07FF9; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 20:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EBB9E07FF7 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 20:25:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CC177C4AD for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 20:25:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v89KPBL6096957 for ; Sat, 9 Sep 2017 20:25:12 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 220982] graphics/mesa-dri: update to 17.2.0 Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 20:25:12 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo CC X-Bugzilla-Type: dep_changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: patch, patch-ready X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jbeich@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: x11@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Sep 2017 20:25:12 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220982 Bug 220982 depends on bug 220981, which changed state. Bug 220981 Summary: graphics/wayland-protocols: update to 1.9 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D220981 What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|In Progress |Closed Resolution|--- |FIXED --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are on the CC list for the bug.=