From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Sep 8 18:01:07 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1C7DBC7E for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 18:01:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46RJxt3D7lz3Nt5 for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 18:01:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: ruby25 from ports will not compile Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 12:01:04 -0600 References: <20190907.101617.1659786179487129769.yasu@utahime.org> To: Mark Millard via freebsd-ports In-Reply-To: <20190907.101617.1659786179487129769.yasu@utahime.org> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46RJxt3D7lz3Nt5 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.60 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.976,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.23)[ip: (-0.82), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(-0.22), asn: 209(-0.04), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 18:01:07 -0000 On 6 Sep 2019, at 19:16, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > From: "@lbutlr" > Subject: ruby25 from ports will not compile > Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 12:44:29 -0600 >=20 >> Trying to update ruby on 11.2-RELEASE-p11 (I have also tried to = switch to ruby26 with basically the same results) >>=20 >> # cd /usr/ports/lang/ruby25=20 >> # make MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=3Dyes install =20 >> vm.c:(.text+0x1e0bb): undefined reference to = `__dtraceenabled_ruby___method__entry' >> vm.c:(.text+0x1e0ef): undefined reference to = `__dtraceenabled_ruby___method__return' >> vm.c:(.text+0x1e15d): undefined reference to = `__dtrace_ruby___method__entry' >> vm.c:(.text+0x1e274): undefined reference to = `__dtrace_ruby___method__return' >> vm.o: In function `hook_before_rewind': >> vm.c:(.text+0x1ed7b): undefined reference to = `__dtraceenabled_ruby___method__return' >> vm.c:(.text+0x1eefe): undefined reference to = `__dtrace_ruby___method__return' >> cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see = invocation) >> *** Error code 1 >>=20 >> Stop. >> make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/lang/ruby25/work/ruby-2.5.6 >> *** Error code 1 >=20 > What is your architecture? I made clean install of 11.2-RELEASE-p14 > amd64, checked out latest ports tree (r511379) and tried >=20 > # cd /usr/ports/lang/ruby25 > # make BATCH=3Dyes install > # cd /usr/ports/lang/ruby26 > # make BATCH=3Dyes install >=20 > Then everything completed successfully. FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p11 #0: Tue Jul 2 21:05:37 UTC 2019 = root@amd64-builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 I=E2=80=99ve just removed ruby for now, I couldn=E2=80=99t find anything = that was using it. --=20 You think you can catch Keyser Soze? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Sep 8 18:59:25 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BB1DD283 for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 18:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46RLF93vqWz3RGR for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 18:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 84478DD281; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 18:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840FDDD27E for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 18:59:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx1.dismail.de (mx1.dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx1.dismail.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46RLF82xBDz3RGQ for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 18:59:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 8a491164 for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 20:59:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (10.240.26.12 [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id dd984d70 for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 20:59:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 86ff123e for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 20:59:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id fd23249e (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 20:59:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 14:59:15 -0400 From: To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Perl 5.30 Message-ID: <20190908145915.1c491174@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46RLF82xBDz3RGQ X-Spamd-Bar: ------ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.89 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=201701]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.223.134]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[dismail.de.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; IP_SCORE(-2.79)[ip: (-9.91), ipnet: 78.46.0.0/15(-2.22), asn: 24940(-1.81), country: DE(-0.01)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[134.223.46.78.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 18:59:25 -0000 Hi! Default Perl version has been switched to Perl 5.30. In my case if I want to switch to default version and follow instructions I should have a problem with rvxt-unicode which I am using and some other apps to which ask or Perl 2.8 or 2.9. I didn't upgrade but how to handle this 'problem", please? Thank you.=20 --=20 =E2=80=9CHungry man, reach for the book: it is a weapon.=E2=80=9D=20 =E2=80=95 Bertolt Brecht From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Sep 8 20:25:00 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E928BE089B for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 20:25:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46RN7w0tq5z43F0 for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 20:24:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Rebuild between dot versions? Message-Id: <57919480-C156-46B4-BAB1-057B24D7EA4B@kreme.com> Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 14:24:58 -0600 To: ajtiM via freebsd-ports X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46RN7w0tq5z43F0 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.44 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.95)[-0.953,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.978,0]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.23)[ip: (-0.81), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(-0.22), asn: 209(-0.04), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 20:25:01 -0000 Is it necessary to rebuild ports when moving from dot versions (like = 11.2 tp 11.3)? Also, is there a way to use freebsd-update to see what the current patch = level is of a release? --=20 Why would I ever want to go outside the Beltway? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Sep 8 20:51:26 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD15E1A85 for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 20:51:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@nethead.se) Received: from ns1.nethead.se (ns1.nethead.se [5.150.237.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "ns1.nethead.se", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46RNkN74DMz45cW for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 20:51:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@nethead.se) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at Nethead AB DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nethead.se; s=NETHEADSE; t=1567975877; bh=v9b0hs8QDKtbos5K2XBZxdqzilGfDR04eOnHX7zW3Uo=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=LLiYSuIaYSJmKTo+uNI9JyvxRP0tExAC8mo3XfY+IszsEdQt+XVQgHXxqNATuqV8s pmGHym4IHH15X+Lz1xQJgOZng88rGAMXVSMV6E5z1+HrosvrZs4uIT9TNfXPV/sAic EfRhOOmPV4v931uR22B2piJPHPxMto+Wbdz/WiHo= Subject: Re: nextcloudclient host not found To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <43c1539e-87d7-ca12-433c-de6095617a0b@nethead.se> From: Per olof Ljungmark Message-ID: Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 22:51:15 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <43c1539e-87d7-ca12-433c-de6095617a0b@nethead.se> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46RNkN74DMz45cW X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=nethead.se header.s=NETHEADSE header.b=LLiYSuIa; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=nethead.se; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of peo@nethead.se designates 5.150.237.139 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=peo@nethead.se X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.78 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[nethead.se:s=NETHEADSE]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:5.150.237.139]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[nethead.se:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[nethead.se,none]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-2.78)[ip: (-9.91), ipnet: 5.150.192.0/18(-4.95), asn: 8473(0.99), country: SE(-0.03)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8473, ipnet:5.150.192.0/18, country:SE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 20:51:26 -0000 On 2019-09-06 16:54, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > FreeBSD12.0-STABLE and nextcloudclient-0.0.0.20190705_3 > > The client syncs fine for some time, then gives up with > > QNetworkReply::HostNotFoundError "Host mynextcloudhost not found" > QVariant(Invalid) > > and it is impossible to restart the sync. > > https://mynextcloudhost/status.php works well from a browser and the IP > is resovable with drill and host and nslookup from Windows. > Answering myself. The apparent reason was Qt5 version mismatch, but why the client worked for a while and the stopped with a "host not found" is beyond me. //per From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Sep 8 20:54:45 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2B5E1F01 for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 20:54:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mail-wr1-x42f.google.com (mail-wr1-x42f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46RNpD32m1z45vZ for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 20:54:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mail-wr1-x42f.google.com with SMTP id y19so11665799wrd.3 for ; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 13:54:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=CYouZZ/h20qW+hOdM3FqL9CBY8taVd0gB11Y3Sfn+0A=; b=N92qynl/Ejj+gQZUjzFTSsT76r/gLX4Gi0SUkVk/ZS8kYNgf0vBoP/PSDJyTxSVqv2 7F+v49cDzH0CBnH0vN5tVdotWV2z7TRPyHQJHKdc+hBBnGfxtI7zKPs5ity3gULIrPJO qAlJKCS60xIQ7JZDCe9q8BCMmFBTJ3ykaubtWce5lU9Y/ztcLNx6U/NGIbXRuKeV/lvB iyEshMZ4UP56jfn90leIqdB26TN0Puya6qSKFg+bnoCO1SAlC9RJbsDs+BylwwDLT2Ao mIl+q0kiWfXECIrY9D27blVae4c0LwD3Tb6lzQCHZjzEDf9wuQCqqPWxi6UnnIkFuSji I+eQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CYouZZ/h20qW+hOdM3FqL9CBY8taVd0gB11Y3Sfn+0A=; b=cEb+4LnNLxAAgvVqWl+xGhKji4HqQhEWcaUz/X0QRfBH87p0VwL6m58PyVQrFb2mMZ p0vrIC92WD31QO9KMILrbaAn7OrGNQTE52lKJtM1Islxn3PF2QJLsXE34F07IWaXsjhN dlGAoXksIt9ntaxbg3DAQr1B5dsjQ8n/N+8Ny3oXt5Cz0E4upo5O9rTMWbf5FCldt9fF kyWy8WyjayayjNWemtYlylBRFkbWp3XMJwLJ8n1uTtcmKEIl5Hj/5Pl/psK4+umo0NKH fsLlJoxTaCLTS6Gm6X+HOxyxibua7i0+3TTRoxsJfl81Bcor1zXRBFxFWhIYETPe/hvc Dgmg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW0crmlRMdIAlnAb+RaUZz+5wKWHZr7gB/YqDNnhcVA18ufOdZV dHOF4xnqfnxQSNjdPqBBjJnpEARhIWjwRsiggUT1y81HoZ0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxZXNx77W29OYfL/EeOi5S4cAb+ZIn0WVzUIsyQDN1tBPGXTwQlKAVXEvlqE1IFtUUTXb2G60RV3D7C0nEjNUc= X-Received: by 2002:adf:f404:: with SMTP id g4mr14976402wro.353.1567976081364; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 13:54:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <57919480-C156-46B4-BAB1-057B24D7EA4B@kreme.com> In-Reply-To: <57919480-C156-46B4-BAB1-057B24D7EA4B@kreme.com> From: Adam Weinberger Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 14:54:25 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Rebuild between dot versions? To: "@lbutlr" Cc: ajtiM via freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46RNpD32m1z45vZ X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=N92qynl/; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of adamw@adamw.org designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::42f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamw@adamw.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.41 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[adamw.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[f.2.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-2.91)[ip: (-9.28), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.97), asn: 15169(-2.27), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 20:54:45 -0000 On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 2:25 PM @lbutlr wrote: > > Is it necessary to rebuild ports when moving from dot versions (like 11.2 tp 11.3)? Sometimes. If a shared library major number changes, or if anything is statically linked, or if dependents expect things in certain places, then yes. Your safest bet is, yes, rebuild everything that depends on that port. > Also, is there a way to use freebsd-update to see what the current patch level is of a release? freebsd-version # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Sep 8 20:57:04 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DA50E2029 for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 20:57:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46RNrv4jFgz461C for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 20:57:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id q17so6924705wrx.10 for ; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 13:57:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=M1ltcXmYq4HO2JLOzUHT4OwydzALicCgLf38wtHWNYk=; b=qImNzoGcAeyUPgtd8Fvkhk62/ZAsuinOj57G6FUO80xNHtk7jSRLKzhz7P1zpj49X5 DOgyAXIQIuHOUqBylr6yHGWWIxQmVBoIEHtUY8pxEMgLhQOhKf+yYRcwSWDKkBrXEXIs 6gfwLFGscz3Rfvk332xVbTtNo/0CCC4Ymc5u+REnG+rF5XgunqwHnFMghp4xnWMZ17Sr V6GjqwLDGe+asdIthMILigV5+JvxcY/3/lbQHjZEc/x3LRCDsepPoOAeMTSF3f1iWGsA RiephitvNEMTyeEfYntPsGYqtFFwzShQGr+OMwOodPMIHg4V8yFSVHzSthn9TXYsERpp b5vQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=M1ltcXmYq4HO2JLOzUHT4OwydzALicCgLf38wtHWNYk=; b=KUMN6u30J9hMQyCXQ/GmRrYnkAY59vZDJ4Z70nfVlu8yFJBv4s0YcNdHiztuHDLGVO dymD3gMTtdPU5gdvG14BhyJC3ok3Y7/GUwdFxJvtI/IU1UhOjGt426kqhJuf/f6rp5eg 1bYIXtBEv1/dhSO6qvghe/dsQZ6TU6wvT3IDDNQuLdj7Mb10X1DiXJudvgwhMg3ngaBS hWns1r39ilvy3RNUb0wu808Nzb51nV/XqHKrNQ72u5rKa54q4MkZ/TyS9HPS9Fe5rqs/ Az7DhrsQz+nWTmLSh6I0PszLb7/qph/TuUtXA7UCO/jTmSbsd9CvxzQ7F9e5UgteqRSS mfbA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW9Rvkdylr1GzUPcYl7Qq87U+keE8YcNU4/bHE6jmMLqTrQepY5 H82xMg8+LjwVLvX14JJ0hOqzTJUhsa65WwaA9U4w5w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzqyLGLcokcsqVEY2EgDYk7gUzfMcyOZuiNf5t3adUewmXhY9KI6fO/0UJX4sfeazGVSxsvaLGLfoKuXY5vWM8= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:428c:: with SMTP id k12mr16239567wrq.196.1567976221957; Sun, 08 Sep 2019 13:57:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <57919480-C156-46B4-BAB1-057B24D7EA4B@kreme.com> In-Reply-To: From: Adam Weinberger Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 14:56:46 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Rebuild between dot versions? To: "@lbutlr" Cc: ajtiM via freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46RNrv4jFgz461C X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=qImNzoGc; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of adamw@adamw.org designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::42e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamw@adamw.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.37 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[adamw.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[e.2.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-2.87)[ip: (-9.06), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.97), asn: 15169(-2.27), country: US(-0.05)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 20:57:04 -0000 On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 2:54 PM Adam Weinberger wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 2:25 PM @lbutlr wrote: > > > > Is it necessary to rebuild ports when moving from dot versions (like 11.2 tp 11.3)? > > Sometimes. If a shared library major number changes, or if anything is > statically linked, or if dependents expect things in certain places, > then yes. Your safest bet is, yes, rebuild everything that depends on > that port. Oh, I think I completely misunderstood your question. You meant when updating FreeBSD to new minors. No, it's not strictly necessary, though you absolutely should rebuild anything that installs a KLD. Compiler improvements usually happen in minor releases, so you certainly won't get that benefit until you rebuild them all. For majors, you absolutely must rebuild everything. > > Also, is there a way to use freebsd-update to see what the current patch level is of a release? > > freebsd-version > > # Adam > > > -- > Adam Weinberger > adamw@adamw.org > https://www.adamw.org -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Sep 8 21:12:05 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CE1E3410 for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 21:12:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauamma@gundo.com) Received: from mail.gundo.com (gibson.gundo.com [75.145.166.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46RPBD70Wqz47qS for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 21:12:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pauamma@gundo.com) Received: from webmail.gundo.com (ibanez.gundo.com [75.145.166.66]) by mail.gundo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A6A524494 for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 16:12:03 -0500 (CDT) Received: from 176.142.0.50 (SquirrelMail authenticated user pauamma) by webmail.gundo.com with HTTP; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 21:12:03 -0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <57919480-C156-46B4-BAB1-057B24D7EA4B@kreme.com> References: <57919480-C156-46B4-BAB1-057B24D7EA4B@kreme.com> Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 21:12:03 -0000 Subject: Re: Rebuild between dot versions? From: "Pau Amma" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46RPBD70Wqz47qS X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of pauamma@gundo.com designates 75.145.166.65 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=pauamma@gundo.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.84 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.31)[-0.310,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.01)[-0.006,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gundo.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[65.166.145.75.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.9.2]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; IP_SCORE(0.55)[ipnet: 75.144.0.0/13(4.19), asn: 7922(-1.36), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7922, ipnet:75.144.0.0/13, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 21:12:05 -0000 On Sun, September 8, 2019 8:24 pm, @lbutlr wrote: > Also, is there a way to use freebsd-update to see what the current patch > level is of a release? Assuming you mean "the highest patch level available for that version", not "the one I'm currently running": I believe this was discussed recently in IRC and the conclusion was "no, but there should be". From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Sep 8 21:39:35 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A326AE3EF1 for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 21:39:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46RPny1BDQz48vB for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 21:39:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Subject: Re: Rebuild between dot versions? From: "@lbutlr" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 15:39:32 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <43CF4581-E228-4A57-8DD7-2B953FA5A0B9@kreme.com> References: <57919480-C156-46B4-BAB1-057B24D7EA4B@kreme.com> To: ajtiM via freebsd-ports X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46RPny1BDQz48vB X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.41 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.985,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.976,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.22)[ip: (-0.80), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(-0.22), asn: 209(-0.04), country: US(-0.05)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 21:39:35 -0000 On 8 Sep 2019, at 15:12, Pau Amma wrote: > On Sun, September 8, 2019 8:24 pm, @lbutlr wrote: >> Also, is there a way to use freebsd-update to see what the current = patch >> level is of a release? >=20 > Assuming you mean "the highest patch level available for that = version", > not "the one I'm currently running": I believe this was discussed = recently > in IRC and the conclusion was "no, but there should be=E2=80=9D. Definitely should be, yes. --=20 Everything that was magical was just a way of describing the world in words it couldn't ignore. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Sep 8 21:40:53 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5337BE3FFF for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 21:40:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46RPqS4L9hz497Y for ; Sun, 8 Sep 2019 21:40:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) From: "@lbutlr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Rebuild between dot versions? Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 15:40:51 -0600 References: <57919480-C156-46B4-BAB1-057B24D7EA4B@kreme.com> To: ajtiM via freebsd-ports In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <7DF944F7-CF99-4ED0-93B0-8FC8D155A45B@kreme.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46RPqS4L9hz497Y X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kremels@kreme.com designates 65.121.55.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kremels@kreme.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.42 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.985,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx:c]; MISSING_MIME_VERSION(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[kreme.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.97)[-0.974,0]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.22)[ip: (-0.80), ipnet: 65.112.0.0/12(-0.22), asn: 209(-0.04), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.112.0.0/12, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.55.121.65.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 21:40:53 -0000 On 8 Sep 2019, at 14:56, Adam Weinberger wrote: > You meant when > updating FreeBSD to new minors. No, it's not strictly necessary, > though you absolutely should rebuild anything that installs a KLD. > Compiler improvements usually happen in minor releases, so you > certainly won't get that benefit until you rebuild them all. Seems to be working so far. I will recommend[pi;e the main things = relatively soon. But all seems good so far. Thanks! --=20 Trying to engage you in any meaningful discussion is like trying to play chess with a pigeon. You shit all over the board and then strut around acting like you won. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Sep 9 06:23:20 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52C7EECCC for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 06:23:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46RdQJ5qkkz4XSX for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 06:23:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C64A9EECC9; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 06:23:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C506CEECC6 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 06:23:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46RdQJ4vm4z4XSQ for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 06:23:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83CEC95B2 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 06:23:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x896NKDS048969; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 06:23:20 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201909090623.x896NKDS048969@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 06:23:20 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 06:23:21 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ biology/phyml | 3.3.20190321 | v3.3.20190908 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Sep 9 23:38:41 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F9BE51AC for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 23:38:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from muon.bsdio.com (muon.bluestop.org [65.103.231.193]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46S4Nw5PlFz4nVN for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 23:38:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from muon.bsdio.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.bsdio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A4F108394 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:38:45 -0600 (MDT) Received: from muon.bsdio.com ([127.0.0.1]) by muon.bsdio.com (muon.bsdio.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id TkhGstna7l0n for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:38:44 -0600 (MDT) Received: from photon.int.bluestop.org (unknown [10.0.10.120]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.bsdio.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:38:44 -0600 (MDT) To: freebsd-ports From: Rebecca Cran Subject: [PATCH] Fix simple typos in Mk/bsd.port.mk Autocrypt: addr=rebecca@bsdio.com; keydata= mQINBFrUMZ4BEADI1yUEGeZeXeTCPay1ZpTBdDEpGPAw1dq2VCSTc1VhsnrEBa1iZxAfaeSv Uu5Ti7jlhQ/3sQMl0bJMKGB/RtmIW7k8h2w476oZmG8gChk8su5ZEx/pV1gdqInyFmmJKTYc gabJz8pL+m82w07qPv+oalepZ4dbj+HF++RAK/iEju+q9UHlsjj8e3mMNsvtrOz1K6bnpveO jZ+ms/2H3Hs5a4k8y6buwe2RvwhJQaXa13cR3LhzL+nwj4B9PHZZEa2WpEyYpw/bI0V9YSQN QgC1CYRzDyakZge6BCM6wHOgZSUzRPufGilrNKUwIVbRoIBR9/85+0wR+PlFUOUOfOc6ox7T dWcIx6PuPhek48rh4uwmmwsPtPiH4Z3T5p+GmWQ9NLFZKA1YnEdaSkWtYZsDxwVZZeYG2plt MfhXP0Hj4rf9Y3eoUenCaGioxAbUOBCtXdTGNAhNjz1g5NGDBVyhjKkzwJQvt9UrYTseERit 5dX2CMTy8hYLvSXd/Ivy+HylUS5IslfZxW5z9LgWX7Z97kILgkH3N0ewtLkygkG+Y+x7uaAV dFqp9ASOyzaiwKbJdeOI+WxRSh+AqeCR0S+bpkcLudLmbjrPmaFwjKycy1H85Z5R2J3YHyXY oT6OYjD8vLbUU2GWp6Onkcy1Pu8EMbRuzKil6HnpYg3BexbPFwARAQABtCNSZWJlY2NhIENy YW4gPHJlYmVjY2FAYmx1ZXN0b3Aub3JnPokCVwQTAQgAQQIbIwUJCWYBgAULCQgHAgYVCgkI CwIEFgIDAQIeAQIXgBYhBB+5fZtkTdO940Yr4g0CK1MRvhAgBQJa2B9zAhkBAAoJEA0CK1MR vhAgzJEQAJUqVmTRO9OqCSS2CVKjrqnEWJMvyo0K8B+WiXo0nSQg9+uyoVU7h2s/kkWVGy4u IWbGy2Qe8LiXzBJjHC3TadGvOvakfdMeKKXcgxgX6KlhA9hA2LW6tg22aHUk7Flr/8diHpgf qIwrXhqJXZmK72GR1QfhgoHsOsTJ9GWPswo1kUMc0cJowq0qP1RDdua6BwvDHHPJwu9OmC/i oQlMNm9gkBDq8H2B+m125ANwCnqBizXaiTTLQdewTMbCSuxbsni2icDqwBfFXzEgcJGaYYfB cQeFsfCmtXQK3JUd4Myx128Dxk9P3X64I93SB7QzB0nmWlyvmCFBNoCp0PCLA4qbwbw2sMRX Wx4BqYa8nI/jg+Nqo+Ut2BfltNZIlsHxK+XhxejfLqAjRCZeLnu1otvFnFuGLaAVYx9x1Y1q J8VizZxq6ujio62Qpultp6KNhlkJ+OKoGwA0k4NHh26SxvlsNxlfg/2v9b1LqWRzNujnwbcF 8g4902XjyBLxV+9YpXZEa8H6zzEHxpeDPWT3QfvrT8JuoHa1IyYnUKvG674UKW5zEGEwkQc9 cuQwR1RHd1ZrKtH1duXzaLr/caMp8ZDfGDDxFpenJTRxNRlg4+K7HSdhpac7sBVMUA8uVdE+ iuTThOmdf0c4DorL3BIh6Yv3FV4/NSqT1Wn3CG2fgG1guQINBFrUMZ4BEADkc4mvMcMcDF1t dNxNQuIBE1F243oZamG3LACCKfc1Yur3CPzHwIk5LXCUmbq23iE5bowxMWw3mlVT0p5xM0Wn UidIBwCKu4kRyy/fY4NyWWBuwy9srpTdmUcKRBRNB8zEZE8xIlidD1ijjgqLBfeM7n9ylawA xHLxwU96sdpdHFzb7Z0yKY2e/bzDaHiG0fUvcCmkgLf+uwKKZid1j8zR5PzKpgPqfy/PF01e KyGV3MNu8Y90xMoiEMWfCI2IB1m+hTuzZoboFvGV54SiMuvfWK/VMQjhsL6K2ddOqwVuy2nI MI4G3xDQW/v8KVyn43OSIAyW1eaklhzu0Ir2sO60PXRkvbTUrouvmSvpJfIQS49rU0M/X6FS DgXQLKrZ3my94+g8ptz9KoVml6s4OAwYVz+sb49nuSxipFKkU5FwhKOLmzbsBxCtytcUJoLm juJPJPDQue6YJiIXyc86GVY2pH3DjemKdbB4dSgqAJIp+lCzKSJzz7bgueh2Ox8vzx1tSxKj 7V8Nal+UTKKbkxPmMh+e20YZ4esAVifO3bS6IJP/aDnfagghB71vA7+aWGXPbjPlc2UHpCBi RSsl+IgoQXvdvZBsKRyfBx8neODa2C6JIE5vcaCjilSeKF8SzsFXvimnndhQNhAPU/DwQwSX dCl4gTsFVi5d8Oxq1sce+wARAQABiQI8BBgBCAAmFiEEH7l9m2RN073jRiviDQIrUxG+ECAF AlrUMZ4CGwwFCQlmAYAACgkQDQIrUxG+ECAWnRAAsmZX+KgNxW3v7R/76Tz4Wjmh4AGeE+Ji 3p5QsdTYny1B6vYBL9vCzPJ/AK8pgKMDRaweUP5eZQpfrdWC8Q7SNGgi4Q+97KEs+i2xZLQ+ WJb8a+WEEIc716u0y4ITiHfOgM5jWcFO4MXQATbJgv0drLLesa+LQCvZgPBqupt307EsCubQ s+Sxt+RVjf6rOUolp1GJXEQYwGsKklVd6yqLC8M1BSG53/WE5tSv5GzBZ8fp6EtmjT7leuid FtEvKYHQz4DqG9ELpHUF0X0UUCBK/MgXe3kCVLKE060UrJ4M6uPSx57rmVFA2MvwQR8M7GsW C5UsSM4PYwPWBhwxE7vcx0691YKAHT/5q8LxRVBdUyzPSprMhSQFttsBt+ygm6wRi3Pi3TuC EARNubPkQefyeC34yr40SAUCkOl3eWxSXPF4NfXFQb4AAzZSE5hv3qbDuwo3lrL0LqpIpEQP Az+JZ1QZ6mMFQ5/JD9Gukj54kZc0X8w3sQt0a8vyE/qrJg8vKgv2rCHrPc5MeDkEUEFiiJiC EDdkJtMyoRlU3S4NrnbyLOLEcHE8fGe3hStPX8hY62id2ecdQ5WZ7vLZW5SFeLarbUciuHIk VL6MHnUjbV7XlY50N7ebeFCIdlCWhdum2FJs/Ni+SSxbZC564vrokwlBBGSo6WTPQTa8IWx1 DtU= Message-ID: <841d6641-af12-0fb0-84df-a7b9274f1a99@bsdio.com> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 17:38:38 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46S4Nw5PlFz4nVN X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rebecca@bsdio.com has no SPF policy when checking 65.103.231.193) smtp.mailfrom=rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.96 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdio.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:209, ipnet:65.103.224.0/19, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.86)[ip: (-9.18), asn: 209(-0.05), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2019 23:38:41 -0000 I'm not a ports committer. So if anyone's interested, could someone else commit the following (change "Unkown" to "Unknown"), please? Index: Mk/bsd.port.mk =================================================================== --- Mk/bsd.port.mk      (revision 511716) +++ Mk/bsd.port.mk      (working copy) @@ -1462,7 +1462,7 @@  .endif  .endfor  .if !defined(_usefound) -ERROR+=        "Unkonwn USES=${f:C/\:.*//}" +ERROR+=        "Unknown USES=${f:C/\:.*//}"  .endif  .endfor   @@ -1984,7 +1984,7 @@  .endif  .endfor  .if !defined(_usefound) -ERROR+=        "Unkonwn USES=${f:C/\:.*//}" +ERROR+=        "Unknown USES=${f:C/\:.*//}"  .endif  .endfor   -- Rebecca Cran From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 10 00:32:24 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CABE635A for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 00:32:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from dnvrco-cmomta03.email.rr.com (dnvrco-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.73.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46S5Zv6tLtz4qLB for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 00:32:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6722@twc.com) Received: from localhost ([96.28.161.151]) by cmsmtp with ESMTP id 7U4xi0vFUWnTi7U50iYz2Z; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 00:32:22 +0000 Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 00:29:12 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: gcc(6)-aux falling behind? X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfMyPnPVetA4MxEOtku25cnnUASqA97kiGquqadK8xRQYKXgza9BoI0HdIqp99i945sOzPNJN4dkqFV4EQMnsIdF2hNM8VgiSq72KedMuxZV3KEAp2cf2 8wrlw/tcZmipp4YwznJENWgPsFKKZ+t/Ji4K7uT6vxy2sPZ6fb2u8vkj X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46S5Zv6tLtz4qLB X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mueller6722@twc.com designates 107.14.73.228 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mueller6722@twc.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.20 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[151.161.28.96.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:107.14.73.0/24]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[twc.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[twc.com]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; MISSING_MID(2.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-3.80), ipnet: 107.14.73.0/24(-2.63), asn: 7843(-2.10), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[228.73.14.107.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7843, ipnet:107.14.73.0/24, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[twc.com]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 00:32:24 -0000 I notice gcc advancing to 7.4, 8.3 and 9.2 while gcc-aux has not gone above v6. I believe this is the only Ada compiler for FreeBSD and NetBSD. Would it be possible to build a gcc that includes Ada using gcc6-aux on the source code for gcc 7.4 or 8.3? Fact that it hasn't been done suggests there might be a reason why. I had even thought about the possibility of using gcc6-aux or gcc5-aux to cross-compile a gcc for Linux. Tom From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 10 01:59:04 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28A3E9C77 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 01:59:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mail-wr1-x442.google.com (mail-wr1-x442.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::442]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46S7Vv5WDgz3ChX for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 01:59:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mail-wr1-x442.google.com with SMTP id d17so4032586wrq.13 for ; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 18:59:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=lbYv/6cUSy9dBoVsgemiXERjMK4FZwCM+qdrA19ciAs=; b=DIqeLk37w0LATi2bmWjEnBLTWxuxTahdikFAQQjj13wuFJQ9HDtoeuvgxHrnfm4ceJ 4Xm9dWyy98snIH6FMFNttqYDTrqwZ2N/X2wBvEb/19LTFZYJA0oS7M0+c9jFierFVqRi ihjOfiZgurMu2ZNrL2KFVfR8LbZ9dBOyYN3vwBv1AeHyJJeCuUgBNmmLO8jS831tVCw+ zGAxMG9liTU9NC2bg3GiICBWKWlQ42cIiUqeM0+VruLIRqCVNQqywFD9JiWderIGEM/r yUmgUlux/E2L688t092LeIqS2Z3A27lDl+tEH2OsTwEc3l34+NQTiBXUPBeGvK46SZON uVZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lbYv/6cUSy9dBoVsgemiXERjMK4FZwCM+qdrA19ciAs=; b=Acc0towKQ8dn4W33MAY6Mbv13Zha7R4S+oowa2V1+YXJxyK7ZcnwvRk5XdqcJ6+1tB zjKFesj7xi7RFdMYFoB1BxIdRrkC8DXlRQOFnlSgxQwtv/9DS4ApiTS9+KrZlO7lyItf r8fuw73m5+vVyWsMIPvyn0iPx09T6od3WUgm9yLh60zx2qVwEKP6HvYgHiSlDwoWsbMo pToMofHXHoL2LnMgAqNh+N31IvyBRVpjxciq9iYIK0WEOclkp30ghVzIkXQ7bIvKMDM6 TT6zOykuGklbBJCkeax5vt9lcOEZZzb23zHILb5qPypJl/UBk4I4Dz/k3fcNUY0oaxYi yULA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVSdZ6zfD49PHN0BFAnqi32ncKNcFa2I4P3pvYOs75IOcBg25L2 KBP4rFC6REJgnZxzCsfZ1xO+/gn8wshpLtDqSn4Z5dh7m6s= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzVF54VhiRG1iLE/H89ViIshiZwzc7WIF+hdSp4ah09V0rfHpRd7ddGaJC8tmPsfN0Bd/Hk4G14F/3YjnZfKmc= X-Received: by 2002:adf:fc4c:: with SMTP id e12mr23778387wrs.147.1568080741479; Mon, 09 Sep 2019 18:59:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <841d6641-af12-0fb0-84df-a7b9274f1a99@bsdio.com> In-Reply-To: <841d6641-af12-0fb0-84df-a7b9274f1a99@bsdio.com> From: Adam Weinberger Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 19:58:45 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix simple typos in Mk/bsd.port.mk To: Rebecca Cran Cc: freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46S7Vv5WDgz3ChX X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=DIqeLk37; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of adamw@adamw.org designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::442 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamw@adamw.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.02 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[adamw.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2.4.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-0.52)[ip: (2.70), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.97), asn: 15169(-2.26), country: US(-0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 01:59:04 -0000 On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 5:38 PM Rebecca Cran wrote: > > I'm not a ports committer. So if anyone's interested, could someone else > commit the following (change "Unkown" to "Unknown"), please? > > > Index: Mk/bsd.port.mk > =================================================================== > --- Mk/bsd.port.mk (revision 511716) > +++ Mk/bsd.port.mk (working copy) > @@ -1462,7 +1462,7 @@ > .endif > .endfor > .if !defined(_usefound) > -ERROR+= "Unkonwn USES=${f:C/\:.*//}" > +ERROR+= "Unknown USES=${f:C/\:.*//}" > .endif > .endfor > > @@ -1984,7 +1984,7 @@ > .endif > .endfor > .if !defined(_usefound) > -ERROR+= "Unkonwn USES=${f:C/\:.*//}" > +ERROR+= "Unknown USES=${f:C/\:.*//}" > .endif > .endfor Done. Thanks Rebecca! I'd love to fix as many of these as you can find. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 10 06:19:31 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD42F2A38 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46SFHR5gQRz3yW5 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C0EC7F2A35; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BB6F2A34 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46SFHR4mTKz3yW1 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88AFB21E1A for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8A6JVnG005270; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:19:31 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201909100619.x8A6JVnG005270@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:19:31 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:19:31 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ biology/phyml | 3.3.20190321 | v3.3.20190909 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/lua-luarocks | 3.0.1 | 3.2.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 10 10:41:05 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C64D2C73 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:41:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46SM5D54Ltz4JDP for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B49B421B8C for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:41:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:41:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= fm3; bh=BuMUSWlD5JMDUhsgI2Hk7RMmgIOmaYkz5hLbxt0SzCk=; b=iqL+PeZI UGc9JYfr0Dp/nHyaBjlMuHHGja3BFXmAGB81jKuMzYsGRSpzyY/XTyYIpcMmBkoF 8GndDNjaELoMU77dAIz4xcf3YM500ntAnDiA2YlvXLKsG6lt+3Ez3sak1fjKV7NE Yh7l7cs4G9nvp7e75/QrWDSMZUyH/yIAnixscCKDrkJh9M3zCygPLJIUtXYYyVMt mbhkoQrwnymmfW1ZoBRGy2g1MQ7a5vbU86MQ6UMLRNTSThgffoBDrH083Wgm9upK SwUEbGo/8CNuyMCgaWNa77/2kNKxfZLOkTQHqaaXPLXaL35SsVUbNEYESRnWXAQp 9BPoVZ7SO7CqJg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=BuMUSWlD5JMDUhsgI2Hk7RMmgIOma Ykz5hLbxt0SzCk=; b=XfxsOPVW+vVtBkp8uf7swUFpQBNIF+wB0lIkyU177Oucs bcHF9cQatvpIUURMNV2jPK6XCH6rk4g3TCFD6+ubqvbgUcseZ/NN7Dxk84IExQuX IuDBp4v3XqskA5rPHvzUfsO1bvoeX8YNz22kLW3Lf9W++6zR4JYcaqyyKn42pCoB KsfN6+QPX8XgTN4EV5ddHsEsxYmGIwUSnjm8VihcmS2EbbucPrsWWeYMT5gs47zc 8BI+KZebXX81Rjwr/16YpAd7fr+YxXjNkOKCrtTGJZDG17LEKfVgVQxDKE/BENOZ au44CAFyvVb/E4mwi1mu+SjUuoPErjACt6dXZD3Ow== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrtddtgddtkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfggtggufgesghdtreertd ervdenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseiihiig shhtrdhnvghtqeenucfkphepkedvrdejtddrledurdelleenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseiihiigshhtrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfu ihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 17B2ED6005A for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 06:41:03 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:41:00 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: pkg check failures Message-ID: <20190910104100.GD41568@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EP0wieDxd4TSJjHq" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46SM5D54Ltz4JDP X-Spamd-Bar: -------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=iqL+PeZI; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=XfxsOPVW; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 66.111.4.27 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-8.18 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.27]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[27.4.111.66.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-3.48)[ip: (-9.81), ipnet: 66.111.4.0/24(-4.84), asn: 11403(-2.68), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:41:05 -0000 --EP0wieDxd4TSJjHq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, context: poudriere-devel, 12-stable Some packages fail pkg check with the following errors: root@desktop:/root# pkg check -d caja Checking caja: 100% root@desktop:/root# pkg check -s caja Checking caja: 0% caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/XMLnamespaces caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/aliases caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/generic-icons caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/globs caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/globs2 caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/icons caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/magic caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/mime.cache caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/subclasses caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/treemagic caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/types Checking caja: 100% should I raise a bug? thanks, --=20 J. --EP0wieDxd4TSJjHq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl13fbQACgkQs8o7QhFz NAU64xAAlEqt1i5IcXbGYe7i4Lzv6n2oCfPsDza5lI1nfG2ThgOeEqkVOR9gVn9z 7am/V40oZFiHhM1G8lnrY84Wz7ZeiEBSAIg6Dqv7dMocYgix/0J92ZEeJWzcYoxF rC4dRif/aakyOqs8VAtYgJ+6H5K5q5+uyCG904xjaNGM4gyumPN1IxFkPt7DiwLr xOsQ6ReIlH6Gn3EgrGkr5Sc4eHP/e1myTMIrfBkPZyNpGOMF3r+y+z1twk78oom3 RyRFu2tBa/AtqI/LdTIlO2Z1EHLgLgq+8TCjiVTkBvoXSnZHlJ12JBVxZAb5JG/P DObFQx/TwbI/F9XFNa0PgTctxEqaf3jz9/YVXrJkJEkMd+xaVaZfu+7H2AN3ciui rlxFTJTuVbsWId/wONREpX3fYOlHH5mk7xsASkT1whcxcameKSAFVU9RM4rNCCL+ Lgw/DdxWw5vxhTSXrFpHF+szlEQG6D6h4qkc19tAGoMyXhrlJcoCVmarh5SfhvUG 0fYBk/TeqKhVgGVI+dVLu6KTwhuA129DyF3KYvUWqaEmmFFtj5FSV0dwLKGuzymA BBFJKNM0krGvkg21b2zmNDCBVB9aCGirB8IO7yF4iP9TqwsG1sUB2+cS2mruapiU K/vEDKnbkwvUVy7amsu+e9gyCrYcCXzn+AjIaCxm8XVe5foaMXQ= =FtkO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EP0wieDxd4TSJjHq-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 10 13:11:50 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C8FD62B8 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 13:11:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46SQR96Qq1z4QT5; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 13:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (etoilebsd.net [178.32.217.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A88DC13DEC; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 13:11:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by ivaldir.etoilebsd.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 99E0DB47F2; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:11:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:11:44 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: ericbsd@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: pkg check failures Message-ID: <20190910131144.zhyhuby455dmzeym@ivaldir.net> References: <20190910104100.GD41568@bastion.zyxst.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4aa7czfw27a6u64k" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190910104100.GD41568@bastion.zyxst.net> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 13:11:50 -0000 --4aa7czfw27a6u64k Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 11:41:00AM +0100, tech-lists wrote: > Hi, >=20 > context: poudriere-devel, 12-stable >=20 > Some packages fail pkg check with the following errors: >=20 > root@desktop:/root# pkg check -d caja > Checking caja: 100% > root@desktop:/root# pkg check -s caja > Checking caja: 0% > caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/XMLnamespaces > caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/aliases > caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/generic-icons > caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/globs > caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/globs2 > caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/icons > caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/magic > caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/mime.cache > caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/subclasses > caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/treemagic > caja-1.22.1_1: checksum mismatch for /usr/local/share/mime/types > Checking caja: 100% >=20 > should I raise a bug? The problem is the caja package is broken as it lists in its plist files th= at do not belong there as they are generated at install time. Maintainer in CC Best regards, Bapt --4aa7czfw27a6u64k Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEgOTj3suS2urGXVU3Y4mL3PG3PloFAl13oQsACgkQY4mL3PG3 PlqXQxAA0QLm3XZR02J4U8rowWEHP7Is1LII8ykDWl19DOLU33MBTW83rjQaEbex js3BkGI2yPDt3Xw4caliCOIfmo475f0i2mkril99DhMJvTNnTPfoU72j7rRZ8+GK lzGwGVXPvXA37pQDJkfkTp4yLTXK54tiOepkfjfJLhHl3VNIwHYZWQ6kJ0KtqC/R DYpR+O6PhbL5CpQ1tpWZrKaLk0F2RgbyDQvZLa2KUjU/79nwgzhM0JQh7U/9IsP0 R8JBirSjRbNgnMpBe9gu1SyjqfB4R/Wv9XzbA4jXBZEN7S0O9QPw/9ZiaSmibJWi Fuqa31cEaoqSfFk9gYFUvqHE4g2awpGmXDhHLLCxKe6int89qfBzGuffZEDRYxQE di7/uWCX8l3/Q8biVdgoRnB8v31WLqWp8s6xQwGchwokS4Q2ah5DUsbTrMVmsO6x m5UNFgWZkLuvzuCFH+9UcVMms63oAPsSteVpS8Ye9GK9cr7+fX+gpPMWGFd10qt0 5g6aSz0kG7Z+pnSxrXscA0dvPG+SNP7dkrp8bczHFE3BG2PMlNfgpzhr0lZv/9DJ yxGsS8/vaaDCk75czy+sdHUtEwRsSqjXAKDu78rkC1WAxd/lZuZMus7g1zpJbV9l CJcfQObwqdmLQDTY0PbuAWqtE8ggFzS9V1Zaq5T2i3eSM7qh42E= =2lUh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4aa7czfw27a6u64k-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 10 14:12:46 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D80D77E8 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:12:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46SRnT46HZz4Ts6 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:12:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB16721B24 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:12:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:12:44 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s= fm3; bh=GKtFx/AxhuflbDYna6eoWvRHzHOcy765uquGV9NaBOo=; b=QmGDMe3f FIVqK6YC71E6xOU19mw/WeF36+ObqGnFoqyeNoeaGd239hh7aP9a6AAFjeCZaKeo 1DfeHiinWri4JGznZ8+q1x7i2Lr8ybl214+L4tfAQkiHhXcV9m4dp9oztK5b7OdY QTxBE27vcJMKhLpf3LJ/zKNdhgnB5qKP4R1H3WKgFvmvBmEHL+llAOeQfo7q1WGK jtU0dsCtmGnEl2P912xso8dOdIy4stYbuCgcy9kr/LqjN2c1/GiGD2+UBQbqlrEq 8e0d1HjT2jQDih1nuS1rS0NWmohNc0taCaf+YPvCBco/3bMuV3uRAgneq4c9pp/L Py0W+WSEtjgoSQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=GKtFx/AxhuflbDYna6eoWvRHzHOcy 765uquGV9NaBOo=; b=T6P7O9BT8zy5j4K1JMSueLmE3TTfK577R8qoAQd/HyR+L EQ+JqxlM2q/CzNZqALrXQYDSuCTgePqXF8wsrEOiWmNdXmnaY6Q8snrFSNDS/LN+ xgPRBPqkRZBCaJfc0pjttlFH5/B2iEhXyOccjMxmLCJaNTqbi0CWYZhI0fTdMW53 8LL+61IK6CCEcWY4i6kz1iK7pDrv5N/cjxNrscJl/X0JLuDntByg7SGL2CvBFix+ zb7izJh6d8YALFerZN70+X3gbv+W36UkiuAGZZo7CuEJ0QJ1QaeAhX8+41eA1slU Mrm3ff5bCs1lfwLIBemV/o2AqqgmhUeg6P36bV0pg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrtddtgdehudcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfggtggufgesghdtreertd ervdenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseiihiig shhtrdhnvghtqeenucfkphepkedvrdejtddrledurdelleenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilh hfrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseiihiigshhtrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfu ihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 00A4D80060 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 10:12:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:12:41 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: databases/mysql-connector-odbc fails to build Message-ID: <20190910141241.GE41568@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="T6xhMxlHU34Bk0ad" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46SRnT46HZz4Ts6 X-Spamd-Bar: -------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=QmGDMe3f; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=T6P7O9BT; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 66.111.4.29 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-8.18 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.29]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[29.4.111.66.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-3.48)[ip: (-9.80), ipnet: 66.111.4.0/24(-4.84), asn: 11403(-2.68), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:12:47 -0000 --T6xhMxlHU34Bk0ad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, context: poudriere-devel on 12.0R-p10, using testport, portstree refreshed daily error is: [00:00:29] /ccache/libexec/ccache/c++ -DDBUG_OFF -DDISABLE_ALL_PSI -DHAVE_LIBDL -DHAVE_LPCWSTR -DTHREAD -DUSE_SQLCOLATTRIBUTE_SQLLEN_PTR -DUSE_SQLPARAMOPTIONS_SQLULEN_PTR -DUSE_UNIXODBC -D_UNIX_ -Dmyodbc5a_EXPORTS -I/usr/local/include/mysql -I/usr/local/include -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/databases/mysql-connector-odbc/work/mysql-connector-od= bc-5.3.13-src -I/wrkdirs/usr/ports/databases/mysql-connector-odbc/work/mysql-connector-od= bc-5.3.13-src/driver/../util -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -std=3Dc++0x -O2 -p= ipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -I/usr/local/include/mysql -isystem /usr/local/include -fno-strict-aliasing -isystem /usr/local/include -g -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -w -MD -MT driver/CMakeFiles/myodbc5a.dir/dll.cc.o -MF driver/CMakeFiles/myodbc5a.dir/dll.cc.o.d -o driver/CMakeFiles/myodbc5a.dir/dll.cc.o -c /wrkdirs/usr/ports/databases/mysql-connector-odbc/work/mysql-connector-odbc= -5.3.13-src/driver/dll.cc [00:00:29] /wrkdirs/usr/ports/databases/mysql-connector-odbc/work/mysql-connector-odbc= -5.3.13-src/driver/dll.cc:128:5: error: use of undeclared identifier 'my_thread_end_wait_time' [00:00:29] my_thread_end_wait_time=3D 0; [00:00:29] ^ [00:00:29] 1 error generated. [00:00:29] ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed. [00:00:29] *** Error code 1 thanks, --=20 J. --T6xhMxlHU34Bk0ad Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl13r08ACgkQs8o7QhFz NAX40g/9Hz+25uBVBO5CexlBJS6isEfrQcrlBdkFVspXy0HcA3NBfZXE97DC0T+Y jRqWeNEpMKn8exlNT5eL1j7MT4RCNYOt1hWqpi8Hf0eYh4vQ3l1OIQ8JWtcR4Qjh gchfFU4Lilsdqnhws2MK4h2YFmKfgu2BuThNPoOd4rJ+73MEAxKnFfIoOFW/PLbC xbEeXkZhHKQ0/V8mATYmkaUCcNuI0xi1MoRK4kiqenpIvZ5SKn4V2nl5FA5mGPCU bJe3XqChx+ydddtHZnqu0Ib87F4JN2rtl0eJo54ZMZ8fm0sNzt4o6yfeRAnj5i3f rVGB5sS6nkJqgWZCtFJi37F1hK4WjSBrajQC76D4ic+VX8V7DPM6CQQdokXBoxom ZOrZJQrHjKDPzIDGYm0LjyYw4fH8GVoVg/qZQJTh2O5MceQ8XE6Tg4Y7NAuTQucr P2mQqtAokSiwvrJNiQSfP7cSpe7QqA6mMt7bXljtyVVWAEEMjQWnCuatXQmWgM2t mugLoxUBZMP5as2WnsPhi+USUI2fK+Z6Q8FwrUE8ugm2R8/wRZ+xY2QDEBoZJkZV JSCuyZdUygfOxnq1in7S5TyXpAlr3VAeM5RPUKL9P+IKU4Ckh71r9IuI+nVJiY/4 TJP2hfXDeQk6o/zg7u8FTI6imHCNiRA869t+Wa4qCrQOj1UxJkE= =7/oK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --T6xhMxlHU34Bk0ad-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 10 14:42:20 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F58D8A96 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:42:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46SSRb5cxYz4WrM for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:42:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from paris-s.drei.host ([213.90.36.62]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i7hLU-0004FI-0T for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:42:16 +0200 Received: from 80-121-61-109.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([80.121.61.109] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by paris-s.drei.host with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1i7hLT-0006Sb-Sa for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:42:15 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20190910141241.GE41568@bastion.zyxst.net> Subject: Re: databases/mysql-connector-odbc fails to build From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <66f12fa7-b214-9ccb-880b-319ec980746b@utanet.at> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:42:27 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190910141241.GE41568@bastion.zyxst.net> Content-Language: en-US X-H3G-Authenticated-As: cf62768e218b4d81d95cc5390f1bd9dfc8b05683 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46SSRb5cxYz4WrM X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at designates 2001:938:1337:25::25:46 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.40 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[109.61.121.80.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:938:1337:25::/64]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[3]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utanet.at]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.56), ipnet: 2001:938::/32(-4.76), asn: 8437(-3.77), country: AT(-0.10)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[6.4.0.0.5.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.5.2.0.0.7.3.3.1.8.3.9.0.1.0.0.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8437, ipnet:2001:938::/32, country:AT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:42:20 -0000 I cannot reproduce, but I found this: https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org&q=subject:%22Re%5C%3A+%5C%5Bgentoo%5C-user%5C%5D+in+world+update+myodbc+5.3.10+will+not+emerge%22&o=newest&f=1 => It may be that to fix it, with an emphasis on the may be, they only need to make it a declaration and not just an assignment in dll.c (correct filename driver/dll.cc), that means add `static uint` before "my_thread_end_wait_time = 0;" at line 114. The correct line number is 128. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 10 15:32:48 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9464D9D10 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:32:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46STYq5rVlz4Z99 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:32:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559F221650 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:32:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:32:47 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=5wZvUzPc2K9efVvkHYlIiL4cnBz yzzcaSBSqgWUMeD0=; b=LOPVx94wm28nA8ioz7mi1H3yGBno0jgl7CeXk5IIJlJ bV68WcxVvnZTOOytjZOVEFMtJhXB6NU8U7I9OJIBhSkEQAK/3DcI10ZlvNCuLkD2 NHZeVmT9kr8dg4QY9OA66M99XHn5wwYCvZNd+omx6NPFGgzVH0lmpkvlnPHBT0gs tP9cod/3W9QEqKxUKZqtQWgEQpP5r/UFxcXPLwiYPlO3/8G9qEF+G6bFYU5myRbU C7tRMT9nCOQMLemjAPFXkhjKHp0Lii6Fcz/mO3LRvRMeT17QEu+qnrMY1TJo3fSS 0JhSYYbh2jYUCcr3z/hBtZC4ezmPAjzrtMu7NmrkQ6w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=5wZvUz Pc2K9efVvkHYlIiL4cnBzyzzcaSBSqgWUMeD0=; b=K/XRCtx+MPUnX6wHC+eLrI uwAPvKlU3aAe1WxqDNi7Li62PxvEN7SEkuZTTqU37xgdYpWBhTrGWHhztFNt3gYJ 6G5eu0WBruc4UeJ2uOfM+qRsrnZRHUEdTtIp0XYloSqiiDs+Om6M39wiLImb1zrF bQyjHK037Ch/aV0Or+/BJKRLG1ERDtgOxG+7By0sQ7pFe/4sdToS7qdnhm3VmtJI Bm+hIXkDU84gNF9ZBTrfNsAmGTayES4YiDyF8GmeVFu0H6vU9cydeCwUK8K6IokD pf3G7vwC0ydQuQZwmOAeVnKb2QsQkupLmAsMFe2yyXYBcLuAOJpAoI8U8ZYTIKiw == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrtddtgdeijecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesghdtre ertdervdenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseii hiigshhtrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinhepmhgrihhlqdgrrhgthhhivhgvrdgtohhmne cukfhppeekvddrjedtrdeluddrleelnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehtvggt hhdqlhhishhtshesiiihgihsthdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 726A18005B for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 11:32:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:32:44 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: databases/mysql-connector-odbc fails to build Message-ID: <20190910153244.GF41568@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20190910141241.GE41568@bastion.zyxst.net> <66f12fa7-b214-9ccb-880b-319ec980746b@utanet.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3yNHWXBV/QO9xKNm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <66f12fa7-b214-9ccb-880b-319ec980746b@utanet.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46STYq5rVlz4Z99 X-Spamd-Bar: -------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=LOPVx94w; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=K/XRCtx+; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 66.111.4.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-8.18 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:66.111.4.28]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[28.4.111.66.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-3.48)[ip: (-9.82), ipnet: 66.111.4.0/24(-4.84), asn: 11403(-2.68), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:32:48 -0000 --3yNHWXBV/QO9xKNm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 04:42:27PM +0200, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: >I cannot reproduce, but I found this: > >https://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=3Dgentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org&q=3Ds= ubject:%22Re%5C%3A+%5C%5Bgentoo%5C-user%5C%5D+in+world+update+myodbc+5.3.10= +will+not+emerge%22&o=3Dnewest&f=3D1 > >=3D> > >It may be that to fix it, with an emphasis on the may be, they only >need to make it a declaration and not just an assignment in dll.c (correct= filename driver/dll.cc), >that means add `static uint` before "my_thread_end_wait_time =3D 0;" at >line 114. > >The correct line number is 128. Hi Walter, seems when it's mysql56 it fails ie mysql-connector-odbc-unixodbc-mysql56-5.3.13_1. mysql-connector-odbc-unixodbc-mysql57-5.3.13_1 builds do you think I should raise a bugzilla ticket? thanks, --=20 J. --3yNHWXBV/QO9xKNm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl13whMACgkQs8o7QhFz NAVhARAAk/8WPspIrKblT3M3galQtb/jMUCZAp6i67g0+5nsGEOpEBeULa5uq3S4 PExCeOlGaoTHbnorQ257PUtx0PGksaxpMrqCbfSg18knc12dN92l4K/d3nkU55PY yDUFcqmGGY+ZROevGxna3qyTl6hRKU4P4OdF3+NxD8m/b2XioQWc+yaYvDexi4m0 d/5wiBpiqhaVsbkM33quLyGJ9Sr6APiIarkxH6q2H3XtTOcNDuFqmgJziiB6HnwE S9O9OyhbGB0n8X7cuLo4sRz2IWuVKIGm1oM+tNdvBLgyx1sa7jYzI3YwtfEsIrtt TGxBA4bXGNly/18POX5AVA2RHqUhXnAaMWcJpEdv/zs1neVMtZsnV9JXDqU3R0GN HgYxJpCnLgy2nNbeA831pg6yl6O9ws/dI0l60ZUNkJ7Fc9idtRSOVFQRh3Dh0SDZ li8XjSOEdScpgNS0hg8kWYl2GCU9Z53jq91x+X8+0qBXk79AcmGNbuIyTzVRtIA1 vNDT1DooYE7XogM6USwvizlx5Oi0/7Ya9iB+1ysU0AdMNysk3Z4yjm9pLCzOqhtH cyyGf4/mN9vKrLRJbetHsWrqEXSb6QXakQjbtSHBewovph60abQK2ZtNWueEgt5T YJZWxK9cHplqiianqi1Lwid+uqcqHNLtEIEpB+rZuqc0/xeogv0= =1L5i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3yNHWXBV/QO9xKNm-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 10 15:46:31 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE472DA27C for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:46:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46STsf6VTyz4b05 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from paris-s.drei.host ([213.90.36.62]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i7iLb-0007IF-AD for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 17:46:27 +0200 Received: from 80-121-61-109.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([80.121.61.109] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by paris-s.drei.host with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1i7iLb-0006qN-6X for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 17:46:27 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20190910153244.GF41568@bastion.zyxst.net> Subject: Re: databases/mysql-connector-odbc fails to build From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <930403d5-be6c-c6a8-f05d-f6779418bc68@utanet.at> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 17:46:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190910153244.GF41568@bastion.zyxst.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-H3G-Authenticated-As: cf62768e218b4d81d95cc5390f1bd9dfc8b05683 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46STsf6VTyz4b05 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at designates 2001:938:1337:25::25:46 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.40 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[109.61.121.80.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:938:1337:25::/64]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utanet.at]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.57), ipnet: 2001:938::/32(-4.77), asn: 8437(-3.77), country: AT(-0.10)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[6.4.0.0.5.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.5.2.0.0.7.3.3.1.8.3.9.0.1.0.0.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8437, ipnet:2001:938::/32, country:AT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:46:31 -0000 Yes. Mysql57 is now default-version. But mysql56 is still a valid version (it is not deprecated). Please file a PR. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 10 16:09:03 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDC3DAD8E for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:09:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46SVMf1gk5z4c3b for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:09:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from pam-s.drei.host ([213.90.36.66]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i7ihQ-0008O0-8w for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:09:00 +0200 Received: from 80-121-61-109.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([80.121.61.109] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by pam-s.drei.host with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1i7ihQ-00051B-51 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:09:00 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20190908145915.1c491174@dismail.de> Subject: Re: Perl 5.30 From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <0e5bf21c-2db5-7391-9a10-8cb9f0e7846b@utanet.at> Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:09:11 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190908145915.1c491174@dismail.de> Content-Language: en-US X-H3G-Authenticated-As: cf62768e218b4d81d95cc5390f1bd9dfc8b05683 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46SVMf1gk5z4c3b X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at designates 2001:938:1337:25::25:46 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.40 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[109.61.121.80.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:938:1337:25::/64:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[5]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utanet.at]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.53), ipnet: 2001:938::/32(-4.75), asn: 8437(-3.76), country: AT(-0.10)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8437, ipnet:2001:938::/32, country:AT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[6.4.0.0.5.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.5.2.0.0.7.3.3.1.8.3.9.0.1.0.0.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 16:09:03 -0000 The last version is from 2016. Maybe, you can get help from http://webchat.freenode.net/?randomnick=1&channels=rxvt-unicode&prompt=1 (or *irc.freenode.org*, channel #rxvt-unicode ) or the maintainer thierry@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 11 00:30:32 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ECF6E980B for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 00:30:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46SjVG5FkNz4FH1 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 00:30:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8CF5A4 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 20:30:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 20:30:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=HJSLwWb77eqsBiD/bPHxJutsL0r +d+4EK7Vn2IukS0w=; b=AwANiyoqYMPQ4MZC6IPXn4iR/JAQcSKhowNPndH1ya+ L2QcHBhuLzhLeQhQkdDjjfm/OeyVzpPx5OTddHWJsxvqHRHCZwItEMC5BUVdxkFJ pM89SwkNekcblP+gjfUdYqzd4+lBjfIe5QiFULEdYkRtJo7HMo8Um0DAwN6JYDXO PjmYWnKT/q7Fc6iMhxuuiuu/9tFfeU36M8M7fs7OPmuVxLtm21TO+HVeAJxRGUFD FMqPazcgsSP7iSPHO1wGC0XR+CVo0QPCYIajucwQrNxreCdb95fvAkKII+5eNEzL /myRSb4Zko6DpCmt3oZlNXLWbYa5Xu9W90IonqkQ2Xw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=HJSLwW b77eqsBiD/bPHxJutsL0r+d+4EK7Vn2IukS0w=; b=QjOnhQWsZ1ZS6UU7BEW+XV jdlpX8jBG33bD93OL7OFQiqbk8lKf7AyqhjvynlR+PXUm4b9CV/ErS7xUXHz7ZVW f9sUMUr21v2WKEhs2EUbeycj1VE5O7EnT022oQpDYsixTWf6QOJ0AZMFuG5N8zqq QzjHAibUhAdxyzmZ5vQYYoMik/mlIiiFYzVxSTEn8kvo66fh8hzrthCfGKjfzVQF qrU6yN6Z6Bdh0KUNGyYpURlJkuuaQ/R1ilJbDT2O+ZVTNzo2Mz3gXObpSI4PJJZX ESbo4UJl2uk8Q86AwZjlKnou9bYckeMFqn6beYEBN41cKfGde0iunxvx0QWxoGdA == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrtddugdefhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesghdtre ertdervdenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseii hiigshhtrdhnvghtqeenucffohhmrghinhepfhhrvggvsghsugdrohhrghenucfkphepke dvrdejtddrledurdelleenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhs thhsseiihiigshhtrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 566ABD6005B for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 20:30:26 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:30:24 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: databases/mysql-connector-odbc fails to build Message-ID: <20190911003024.GG41568@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20190910153244.GF41568@bastion.zyxst.net> <930403d5-be6c-c6a8-f05d-f6779418bc68@utanet.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XaUbO9McV5wPQijU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <930403d5-be6c-c6a8-f05d-f6779418bc68@utanet.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46SjVG5FkNz4FH1 X-Spamd-Bar: -------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=AwANiyoq; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=QjOnhQWs; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 64.147.123.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-8.18 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.123.24]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[24.123.147.64.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-3.48)[ip: (-9.78), ipnet: 64.147.123.0/24(-4.90), asn: 11403(-2.68), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 00:30:32 -0000 --XaUbO9McV5wPQijU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 05:46:38PM +0200, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: >Yes. Mysql57 is now default-version. But mysql56 is still a valid >version (it is not deprecated). > > >Please file a PR. Raised https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D240484 thanks, --=20 J. --XaUbO9McV5wPQijU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl14QBgACgkQs8o7QhFz NAWDnQ//bh+asU4Q7/gyvl0cGnuvahLsSlg2l67R/6GAWaJ+8xqnnrR9or5JUhlq qXgAw/2fTBR99Zll/k4QU4OqBdrFfpzNP49i5SiTeOgg+IgkD25IGpoOIO7qDw43 FTY8GSezEvHolzPlnXt8KX6nmJsMTXJuxl5yyNcxlIUcpXyDVrUIVv8drHqBBSWE s5QsRJ1eNr8s3PKLHMXRiymBK8ED5NTkt0Riet+dM7SfNG55O32uO7mDApwi0BR3 ybcFSaAVqEl88+/Diaj51Nj0XBxWKyA0a58qQ+dHtA1AYNkoC/WDDQgmnY8oB2L4 t+mdxGJOCqXaJqWJlkcXs7+GKdZdqahCF51LFVRyxRAD9Ci2pymgsqwrEWr7KB/s 1esUkgg54hp+fTHt9ErxCMAjoFyEyEkLIml+Y80vJXA1grWw3aIJukabDFIVo0h4 1pJJIrQP49zOFTk3FXbweQh/HX+Hih5Iggecqhltr/M1N/Uuk9F1VcH98/rJ/TXX KT0R0rBZtWdVo/GjOWDIndnNt/2tXbjoE3wsIo1V4ODsgSmTUsaevBsDixUgdyrq oajjowowynBCIky6SOud6HyN029NUPUPqHxTWEESj2WXRazogTp4mTAw4A8dNEYy FXveIqhHxijoDW3003VS67QEXYiBLygwx5RsqColmZ+oaDQ48hw= =XKFW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XaUbO9McV5wPQijU-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 11 01:00:24 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0190EEA276 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:00:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from taro.utanet.at (taro.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Sk8k47JZz4GMm for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:00:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from pam-s.drei.host ([213.90.36.66]) by taro.utanet.at with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i7qza-0002ho-Ey for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 03:00:18 +0200 Received: from 80-121-61-109.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([80.121.61.109] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by pam-s.drei.host with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1i7qza-0005Oy-BG for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 03:00:18 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20190911003024.GG41568@bastion.zyxst.net> Subject: Re: databases/mysql-connector-odbc fails to build From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <758e5976-9834-8fc3-33d9-05e27a89d6a8@utanet.at> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 03:00:30 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190911003024.GG41568@bastion.zyxst.net> Content-Language: en-US X-H3G-Authenticated-As: cf62768e218b4d81d95cc5390f1bd9dfc8b05683 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46Sk8k47JZz4GMm X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at designates 2001:938:1337:25::25:45 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.40 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[109.61.121.80.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:938:1337:25::/64:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utanet.at]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.49), ipnet: 2001:938::/32(-4.76), asn: 8437(-3.76), country: AT(-0.10)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8437, ipnet:2001:938::/32, country:AT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[5.4.0.0.5.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.5.2.0.0.7.3.3.1.8.3.9.0.1.0.0.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:00:24 -0000 Have you tested if /`static uint` before "my_thread_end_wait_time = 0;" helps? / From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 11 01:30:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43C65EAB7C for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:30:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Skqy1X10z4HTj for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3C0749 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 21:30:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 10 Sep 2019 21:30:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=/4Y9BeS2NOuYmzTAWugH9gacMZs P34g/UP+EQzLErOI=; b=q4vFHNCLSHWzrwOyQfJVNjV00RrJcrunTIvBwbIW8HU vo4GMlV7WyZvroOgoVfjO32SIhhculEHFv+vnZjVgXPMFvNuDoRIqUQpChQfaA2A ap1FLhtAvnj0HaZzEEYftrU2TmXw4QjAPFRhDFHZ+pX8qjG+OsGcrJDGA6c1LJzE mfrvDwHZPKHzQM0mL+N+EP7jyQJHJFYo3FxXdVL2pgNDUA/uLR1DqQk3iUecoogZ ilIWjtwW2TV0I+prUsfwp5nt9bDkQPDz7YcXAOD4hMFoEev9tFQSPBgRiei+kefK +sOlCCnnMRd3rfXfGfrc9eFAKQO7G4DV6tB0E1YadCg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=/4Y9Be S2NOuYmzTAWugH9gacMZsP34g/UP+EQzLErOI=; b=F/BmHVreIXgpcJVuWI1CKZ tTbWZzJvpBWyooXVdYlU7zDjN0m2fIU2W4/bnznPfgnGvli9w3L5f6/TD7j5QHT0 4R4Ec6xDE+9109yk5C2poxmr7pHsqbhY2ZJ0ay3CP3+qxTNUde7Ci4nPhW6z6nCW Hgys4VYu9qIosasoDKkONrLwXxEAcJi1p0EckMj4rn6IhiR75ncGDtxu3GiPzHte y9LsU4d/a9zqheNSXcI9V8okXeDtdrw6Kv8XhgwuAN7Ot20byXNXly1f0Mt9JldQ v0sYBApoxmXc4G5XOY4doRJyDEawHnfmBIeH13zTDkMIVLOe9G9W4eayCv6zzY5Q == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrtddugdegjecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjfgesghdtre ertdervdenucfhrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsuceothgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseii hiigshhtrdhnvghtqeenucfkphepkedvrdejtddrledurdelleenucfrrghrrghmpehmrg hilhhfrhhomhepthgvtghhqdhlihhsthhsseiihiigshhtrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgv rhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from bastion.zyxst.net (bastion.zyxst.net [82.70.91.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5B22E80059 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 21:30:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 02:30:49 +0100 From: tech-lists To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: databases/mysql-connector-odbc fails to build Message-ID: <20190911013049.GH41568@bastion.zyxst.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20190911003024.GG41568@bastion.zyxst.net> <758e5976-9834-8fc3-33d9-05e27a89d6a8@utanet.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="54u2kuW9sGWg/X+X" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <758e5976-9834-8fc3-33d9-05e27a89d6a8@utanet.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46Skqy1X10z4HTj X-Spamd-Bar: -------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=zyxst.net header.s=fm3 header.b=q4vFHNCL; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm3 header.b=F/BmHVre; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of tech-lists@zyxst.net designates 64.147.123.25 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tech-lists@zyxst.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-8.17 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[zyxst.net:s=fm3,messagingengine.com:s=fm3]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:64.147.123.25]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[zyxst.net]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[zyxst.net:+,messagingengine.com:+]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[25.123.147.64.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:64.147.123.0/24, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-3.47)[ip: (-9.72), ipnet: 64.147.123.0/24(-4.90), asn: 11403(-2.68), country: US(-0.05)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 01:30:55 -0000 --54u2kuW9sGWg/X+X Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:00:30AM +0200, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: >Have you tested if > >/`static uint` before "my_thread_end_wait_time =3D 0;" helps? / Hi, Yes, unfortunately it didn't help; same error thanks --=20 J. --54u2kuW9sGWg/X+X Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEE8n3tWhxW11Ccvv9/s8o7QhFzNAUFAl14TkAACgkQs8o7QhFz NAVzew/8DjkYClmgpxKGE/zqEM0aXnQCO/6nIsjJgUnwQVi528mqWP4/jllZcQi/ hL0R4pIcBJ9UrimgBq/yVlhy71f58IOWPBypnLx6W+Ez7ZeddeXRvyQcjEKxCSpo 6HzaFhGA5ip+7ccvQvGY2enXUo3whmlE6PbYE+ePu1tzxui1SA0gZMhV9pQ8Q8/Q 7tWRxZBVQAOm3jdF9mXi/+pJ8hTYAVhOEfvGTxrdW1oIeIsx7V2VySBOmXnxhElB o9AatpKDELwzDNcE2Tk+sDwsUBLftvqjX7OLetZ79qVLtOZDtndvzf19qAEpw/LH uqmyuQ/z6AcMuQEKa7zDIDi43rE/8jHLd4xe1o+wZOy5oDjNuTRDHSNsx0uyCgUr aRdkb9z4rJhwMYqhinkBIT91KO07BOsAixvekdJ8txt3mUtgzjlLvqwxU3TrlF2E mN4m70LIefiuQbS14RG56VxuPqFIg220PO9h284IIY14p59396uEW8QMHBmPoeqN 5T3ZrhmWtmb/vJHXCKkZya9Lvl0ZaDiuyEG6SIhV+du3i9kTmf7muYsM/8rsuzpq xMzFAwx8T4qXtW/JjuOBwDXpVu+emsHhEOGxFagt38Pf2M5Fj+6V7tp2Ed6Gpt3W TLU5bkE2i8hnq8LXMEuSeFO+XEcLXEsnHbYeEQrEWwpvwgCSLoU= =rohC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --54u2kuW9sGWg/X+X-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 11 08:26:45 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38481F324C for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 08:26:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from taro.utanet.at (taro.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:45]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Sw3m4RHHz4bNK for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 08:26:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from paris-s.drei.host ([213.90.36.62]) by taro.utanet.at with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i7xxa-0005PG-Lm for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:26:42 +0200 Received: from 80-121-61-109.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([80.121.61.109] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by paris-s.drei.host with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1i7xxa-0003fn-HZ for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:26:42 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Subject: option check Message-ID: <8ad03913-7462-3ab3-64d2-4c855270df05@utanet.at> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:26:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-H3G-Authenticated-As: cf62768e218b4d81d95cc5390f1bd9dfc8b05683 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46Sw3m4RHHz4bNK X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at designates 2001:938:1337:25::25:45 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.40 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[109.61.121.80.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:938:1337:25::/64:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utanet.at]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.51), ipnet: 2001:938::/32(-4.76), asn: 8437(-3.77), country: AT(-0.10)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8437, ipnet:2001:938::/32, country:AT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[5.4.0.0.5.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.5.2.0.0.7.3.3.1.8.3.9.0.1.0.0.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 08:26:45 -0000 I am trying to check from the Makefile if an other port has one OPTION on or off. Don't find a working syntax. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 11 08:53:47 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EAE8F438B for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 08:53:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Swfz0T22z4dMq; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 08:53:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id E3623B118; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 08:53:46 +0000 (UTC) From: Jan Beich To: Walter Schwarzenfeld Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: option check References: <8ad03913-7462-3ab3-64d2-4c855270df05@utanet.at> Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:53:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8ad03913-7462-3ab3-64d2-4c855270df05@utanet.at> (Walter Schwarzenfeld's message of "Wed, 11 Sep 2019 10:26:56 +0200") Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 08:53:47 -0000 Walter Schwarzenfeld writes: > I am trying to check from the Makefile if an other port has one OPTION > on or off. > > Don't find a working syntax. Unlike Gentoo requesting dependencies built with particular options set is not supported yet. The feature has been requested for years i.e., soon after OPTIONS were introduced. What ports *currently* can do is invent ad hoc check (see below), create slaves/flavors or adjust defaults. $ rg -g \*.mk -g Makefile\* pkg-config.\*exists graphics/gtk-update-icon-cache/Makefile 43: @if ! pkg-config --exists cairo-xlib; then \ www/webkit2-gtk3/Makefile 108: @if ! pkg-config --exists cairo-egl; then \ x11-toolkits/gtk20/Makefile 58: @if ! pkg-config --exists cairo-xlib; then \ x11-toolkits/gtk30/Makefile 96: @if ! pkg-config --exists cairo-xlib; then \ x11-toolkits/pango/Makefile 50: @if ! pkg-config --exists cairo-gobject; then \ Beware of flavors. Until variable dependencies are supported ports cannot depend on a particular flavor without introducing conflicts. For example, A depends on B@OPT1 while C and D depend on B; a user would have to give up on C and D to have A installed. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 11 19:07:49 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D27DD449 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 19:07:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46TBHS6c7Hz4Jw9 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 19:07:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from pam-s.drei.host ([213.90.36.66]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i87xy-0004bM-4S for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 21:07:46 +0200 Received: from 80-121-61-109.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([80.121.61.109] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by pam-s.drei.host with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1i87xy-0000TS-0J for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 21:07:46 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: Subject: Re: option check From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 21:08:00 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-H3G-Authenticated-As: cf62768e218b4d81d95cc5390f1bd9dfc8b05683 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46TBHS6c7Hz4Jw9 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at designates 2001:938:1337:25::25:46 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.40 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[109.61.121.80.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:938:1337:25::/64:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utanet.at]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.54), ipnet: 2001:938::/32(-4.75), asn: 8437(-3.76), country: AT(-0.10)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8437, ipnet:2001:938::/32, country:AT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[6.4.0.0.5.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.5.2.0.0.7.3.3.1.8.3.9.0.1.0.0.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 19:07:49 -0000 Thanks for answer. pkg-config does not work in this case. It was needed a change in configure.in. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Sep 12 05:24:02 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BED3EB627 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:24:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46TRyV1L8nz3Lhn for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:24:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2C071EB626; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:24:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AAE4EB625 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:24:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46TRyT6tmTz3Lhm; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:24:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (unknown [IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:d1bc:47cc:f1b9:5e8d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: meta/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF2432E1D4; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:24:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:23:58 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: dos2unix patch? Message-ID: <20190912052357.rywdc2ewf3nrpy36@icepick.vmeta.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE amd64 User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 05:24:02 -0000 Hi, is it possible to run dos2unix to patches fetched from PATCH_SITES? or how can I change order of patch and dos2unix. I would like to apply dos2unix-ed patches to dos2unix-ed source. Alternatively, applying patch first and then running dos2unix on patched-source is OK to me. Patches fetched from PATCH_SITES have .patch suffix so I added *.patch to DOS2UNIX_GLOB but it didn't work. USES= dos2unix DOS2UNIX_GLOB= *.c *.h -- meta From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Sep 12 09:50:59 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 299CAF1189 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46TYtV6L2pz43Lh for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:50:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D96BBF1188; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:50:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92E5F1187 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:50:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x432.google.com (mail-wr1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::432]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46TYtT2XVXz43Ld for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:50:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x432.google.com with SMTP id a11so17952071wrx.1 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 02:50:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:mime-version; bh=U9KN/AYKWImp/LPTprS/IWoL90cIymDNdSXqE5zyFmM=; b=u+7Vw9K2Ar1SYMhO5qN6OeJSYw6R668bClIihYFxfn1+JKlcC+LCYwagqWwqpHOLeh OHV9Da9ADG7f+cnlht9NtBCOrYCbsFGJGRrDy39ZKoXRS/UNNE5dFzbF66KS5ZHs1QVQ fAJqWC+FzA2nd/88Gi5bufF9cp1SfAStS0lM8DccsUPqOyYVUw9tQtW7KLoU3stDOHBc e5C1U19QR6BA+lm2pgBcbAUUc4c7SX/cVOBhgd0IN5eATKKpUpZ7uirLSQti7iSYnD3R U4/m70L4El3+zgwiMTi4UDu/Rnr4RqerZRIl0c8g0Z4AlXLDOQ+2bofJWG4DbJocBblS QQzw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :mime-version; bh=U9KN/AYKWImp/LPTprS/IWoL90cIymDNdSXqE5zyFmM=; b=MQCCbGk/hiyvvnXeZiyqNCQKXrhcjXPPF7en9rc+SYy3Rcka4rc/AzAo8snwvJtlXX 6TOPBuyjfV/DxeN9XBXeAl/K6NspuuM/0yK6LhSxcZIHhq9x+1tT7MIhP5i6g0csBMwg d+fDcQZu8JUF1LUHks/IVTft+wvo4XzzBGe5FhZ/z2NXFgejdbkJzOI0+N5WGfp/i5iA UKXEbQva618lMgDkNglMWlSEc3nfrVyf7NAh0RQTwRVlqTeNju2GiiPEX6qWoJGxlsnQ fmuJEcXifnZ1EYv38fBie5/6tmnaItBUqAlg4N55pEKLnrH0EhkFsk2u6S8PIYeUTb/G U+8g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW+1Ixhcd321B2TpKfT6rT2YycxAcwcabDGMj2VCHCOEsoIc5hm gJrfDrxjH0EtWPKNyyLmD+act+uj X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzAu7V7PrdkcwXEpWxT8exmFSLRcs/RvwSkBJgnRyLqlfrNmfXUGXCKTArW2TgCF0n/YJanRg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:61c4:: with SMTP id q4mr5036646wrv.327.1568281854898; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 02:50:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tardis.goksinakdeniz.net ([24.133.100.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d78sm6752844wmd.47.2019.09.12.02.50.53 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 02:50:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:50:48 +0300 From: =?ISO-8859-9?Q?G=F6k=FEin?= Akdeniz To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: x11-themes/fluxbox-tenr-styles-pack Message-Id: <20190912125048.23d9c7b2222066e785970179@gmail.com> Reply-To: goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA256"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__12_Sep_2019_12_50_48_+0300_oI4+=pLfzVbjC6rR" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46TYtT2XVXz43Ld X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=u+7Vw9K2; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of goksinakdeniz@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::432 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=goksinakdeniz@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.40 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[goksin.akdeniz@gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(0.00)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(0.00)[gmail.com,none]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_XBL(5.00)[254.100.133.24.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.4]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(0.00)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[254.100.133.24.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; FREEMAIL_REPLYTO(0.00)[gmail.com]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; BAD_REP_POLICIES(0.10)[]; REPLYTO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2.3.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.51), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.96), asn: 15169(-2.25), country: US(-0.05)]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 09:50:59 -0000 --Signature=_Thu__12_Sep_2019_12_50_48_+0300_oI4+=pLfzVbjC6rR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-9 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello everyone, The URL for x11-themes/fluxbox-tenr-styles-pack distfiles have changed. All themes old and new are listed below: http://tenr.de/styles/ http://tenr.de/styles/archives/tenr.de-styles-pkg.tar.bz2 http://tenr.de/styles/archives/fluxmod-styles-pkg.tar.bz2 I hope some one with commit privilages can change URL defined at ports file. --=20 G=F6k=FEin Akdeniz --Signature=_Thu__12_Sep_2019_12_50_48_+0300_oI4+=pLfzVbjC6rR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEAOcSWvHwvYi6tNXpRD1lKJ7+xlYFAl16FPgACgkQRD1lKJ7+ xlYd2g//eKkw3h4KRkhsyQTTOrj+Xf2aRMmtbzhRCZUFhXbh4UKwLVDYeKzoMpji WtWGrCGE2fu8dUbuBZf9hgiXpO4k/m2eECH2CsqdWOSu5oca+9r0JUfNelQzE4c1 UhGK8rf529oERj+ZGVbx1n8Ddw/bSqpZnHzgM90fp49hj+6qfVMO1vWFUmLpe46d 9rXDPorSA6pssvoMk15vM+Zdu57E/fegFwIv5Jtxx3lCIOYiAAiicazgdYvooUCK QgmnrMqJlSmhDkzznQDgmZikqlhSZKzsp1WNzHjmdATYMBKC2TsTy/jc8tqbOcro XtywaAZE0DTWPFSAIsvhJky/v87yV4hjHFCBPks8cOCkF7KV0QNFvWNlar74YXR2 5Rty6RCw1Q8eh7j59N0q/5osPesAyyhVpSteqCHQ+WBLAvr8zdL+7SJGEHj2gtMt LmczAjYgSif5d5PCF7f3hiGz+sDxs5/fgP7AQ9AbqmpHbyB2GHDSCfvqCaCeZAvv BHNbO4enz0yYFbUtMdKgbTsWSEFw5KwJDtIREzM6p5KxpmGsNzfkE+pQZO7jSkMt UVzCx6KZGslDB/F7DVpRqlpLDvTIZfC2PRHwFICldK06Xgo+XPnB+hYnMA1Qo04M EaR2Og219xYqy1/klXlvYNveNCe/s6VuIxMKkifspn2kBjlFI2I= =Ppv6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__12_Sep_2019_12_50_48_+0300_oI4+=pLfzVbjC6rR-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Sep 12 10:17:28 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8D2F1B46 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:17:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46TZT26bXVz44pL for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:17:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from pam-s.drei.host ([213.90.36.66]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i8MAF-00025K-Q1 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:17:23 +0200 Received: from 80-121-61-109.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([80.121.61.109] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by pam-s.drei.host with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1i8MAF-0007p7-MS for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:17:23 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20190912125048.23d9c7b2222066e785970179@gmail.com> Subject: Re: x11-themes/fluxbox-tenr-styles-pack From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:17:40 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190912125048.23d9c7b2222066e785970179@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-H3G-Authenticated-As: cf62768e218b4d81d95cc5390f1bd9dfc8b05683 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46TZT26bXVz44pL X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at designates 2001:938:1337:25::25:46 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.57 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:938:1337:25::/64:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HFILTER_URL_ONELINE(2.50)[plain:0:1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[109.61.121.80.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8437, ipnet:2001:938::/32, country:AT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[6.4.0.0.5.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.5.2.0.0.7.3.3.1.8.3.9.0.1.0.0.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utanet.at]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.50), ipnet: 2001:938::/32(-4.74), asn: 8437(-3.75), country: AT(-0.10)]; HFILTER_URL_ONLY(1.47)[0.66666666666667]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:17:28 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240529 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Sep 12 11:13:33 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 059F0F2C76 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 11:13:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Tbjl45XBz47gQ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 11:13:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from guardian.ventu (88-147-119-21.v4.ngi.it [88.147.119.21] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x8CBDOve094505 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:13:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host 88-147-119-21.v4.ngi.it [88.147.119.21] (may be forged) claimed to be guardian.ventu From: Andrea Venturoli Subject: Status of samba ports To: timur@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 13:13:23 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.83 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46Tbjl45XBz47gQ X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it has no SPF policy when checking 2.44.121.52) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.81 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.994,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netfence.it]; IP_SCORE(-1.72)[ip: (-5.57), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(-2.79), asn: 30722(-0.27), country: IT(0.03)]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 11:13:33 -0000 Hello. I'd like some information WRT to the status of samba ports, what is [not] working, what *should* be working and what is planned. I'm using samba48 at several sites and I'm obviously encountering the problem described in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239480 Today I tried a classicupgrade (with samba48) and it ended with a core dump of python2.7. I wasn't surprised at all, of course. Since this is (at least for now) a test, I decided to try 4.10: I was surprised to see a similar error! I know the problems with ACL/ZFS/etc... (in the past I had to apply patches and add extra argument to "samba-tool domain classicupgrade" or "samba-tool domain provision" to work around this). However, I wasn't expecting this to fail in a way similar to how 4.8 does, i.e. with the messages: > INFO 2019-09-12 13:06:52,919 pid:4760 /usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py #2286: Setting up share.ldb > Unable to find backend for '/var/db/samba4/private/share.ldb' - do you need to set LDB_MODULES_PATH? > ERROR(ldb): uncaught exception - None > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line 185, in _run > return self.run(*args, **kwargs) > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/samba/netcmd/domain.py", line 1690, in run > useeadb=eadb, dns_backend=dns_backend, use_ntvfs=use_ntvfs) > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/samba/upgrade.py", line 743, in upgrade_from_samba3 > use_ntvfs=use_ntvfs, skip_sysvolacl=True) > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/samba/provision/__init__.py", line 2287, in provision > share_ldb = Ldb(paths.shareconf, session_info=session_info, lp=lp) > File "/usr/local/lib/python3.6/site-packages/samba/__init__.py", line 115, in __init__ > self.connect(url, flags, options) If I understand correctly, the above problem with 4.8 is due to its dependency on Python 2.7; I thought 4.10, which is using Python 3.6, would not exhibit this behaviour... Any comment on this? I know I can try and build 4.8 with external dependencies; in fact I tried, but had no luck so far. Since Samba 4.8 will stop being supported in a very short time, I'd like to stop wasting my time with it and start moving to 4.10. Is it supposed to be production ready? What does and what does not work? Is there some page (wiki or whatever) that outlines the status of Samba on FreeBSD? Is there anything we can do to help? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Sep 12 16:08:27 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADF2D2B1F for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 16:08:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46TkG339LGz4RDB for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 16:08:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6AD59D2B1E; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 16:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A986D2B1D for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 16:08:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46TkG328q6z4RD9 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 16:08:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D3F21368; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:08:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from imap38 ([10.202.2.88]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:08:26 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=cHtljO pA9Wrp4UTC4IQ/MIef7i5K/m+PbFSGF8pocac=; b=vWjkS674QsJxRo+lQZOfJV h2V3CN7ysgP2ipyx5KWyeO1M7m9m5F6goC4a1y/LZgxHLaF8SXQAQPB60OVTWPQd Xs00HmjCtxSBxJq94YF7s386WzkxzWXJ3hyoTJFGrS6SPfbg+qiHJGg4StsHWG9W 3W+xO2BBt8X88nqusZkST9EfcUUkcnNs1M9Ntio9T9xcjzpvNNc4IhkfJJUZ/q/7 v4by8q+vXNNnJg8L10xD9VQ9YnlpBC2VbJ9kCy/jMFURt18/NreoVqSUXa+dTLqC PkmMVuZ44pB2+EtrqUyTbyyVXY2ILSg1alqilGZ4yIWVP3UUSfDGEOLQhAIx5GBQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrtdehgdeliecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsehttdertderredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfofgrrhhk ucfhvghluggvrhdfuceofhgvlhgusefhrhgvvgeuufffrdhorhhgqeenucfrrghrrghmpe hmrghilhhfrhhomhepfhgvlhgusefhrhgvvgeuufffrdhorhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfu ihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0E4664C000A4; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 12:08:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-237-gf35468d-fmstable-20190912v1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <70ca62ff-40f7-4f64-b911-69d90e2697c5@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 11:08:04 -0500 From: "Mark Felder" To: "Jon Otterholm" Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: unifi5-5.10.25 Content-Type: text/plain X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46TkG328q6z4RD9 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:66.111.4.0/24, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 16:08:27 -0000 On Thu, Sep 12, 2019, at 04:18, Jon Otterholm wrote: > > Hi. > > > Any plans for updating this port to the latest release? > > Hello, I've been traveling to conferences last few weeks which has kept me distracted, but I'm about to test the latest update. It will be in ports shortly. Thanks for the reminder! Mark -- Mark Felder ports-secteam & portmgr alumni feld@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 13 06:39:05 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2440E7B08 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:39:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46V5Zd4p52z4DdL for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:39:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A162DE7B05; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1217E7B00 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:39:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46V5Zd3m8Cz4Dd8 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:39:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (portscout.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CF32306A for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:39:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.nyi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x8D6d5kx084255; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:39:05 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201909130639.x8D6d5kx084255@portscout.nyi.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.nyi.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:39:05 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:39:05 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ science/psychopy | 1.90.3 | 3.2.3 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 13 06:56:05 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCD0E8195 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:56:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46V5yF1SRnz4Fc5 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:56:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 30095E8194; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:56:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E9E6E8192 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:56:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46V5yF05Qcz4Fc4; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:56:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (unknown [IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:9d6d:3b99:ed1:4e61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: meta/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3B399B73; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:56:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:55:59 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: dos2unix patch? Message-ID: <20190913065559.m6bjui2tvho6jbkq@icepick.vmeta.jp> References: <20190912052357.rywdc2ewf3nrpy36@icepick.vmeta.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190912052357.rywdc2ewf3nrpy36@icepick.vmeta.jp> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE amd64 User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 06:56:05 -0000 Finally I decided to manage all ports patches in my GitHub fork. I describe current status of the port: - Upstream source is CRLF - patches in FILESDIR are LF because CRLF patches in svn repo should be marked as binary - To apply these patches, convert to LF using USE=dos2unix I believe this is common technique and now a few numbers of ports do so. The problem is adding a backport patch from upstream. I pick a git commit from upstream and add to PATCHFILES. Patching is done after dos2unix. Applying upstream patch to dos2unix-ed source will fail. So I wanted to apply CRLF patch before dos2unix, apply LF patches after dos2unix but current ports framework cannot do such hack. Finally I quit mixing CRLF patchs and LF patches. I commit ports patches to my GitHub fork of upstream product and fetch from there. This does not cause line-ending mismatch. On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 02:23:58PM +0900, Koichiro Iwao wrote: > Hi, > > is it possible to run dos2unix to patches fetched from PATCH_SITES? > or how can I change order of patch and dos2unix. > > I would like to apply dos2unix-ed patches to dos2unix-ed source. > Alternatively, applying patch first and then running dos2unix on > patched-source is OK to me. > > Patches fetched from PATCH_SITES have .patch suffix so I added *.patch > to DOS2UNIX_GLOB but it didn't work. > > USES= dos2unix > DOS2UNIX_GLOB= *.c *.h > > -- > meta > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- meta From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 13 07:45:23 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64ACE93C8 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 07:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46V7374tfRz4JR6 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 07:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A6171E93C6; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 07:45:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CE9E93C5; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 07:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46V7373yzXz4JR4; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 07:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (unknown [IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:9d6d:3b99:ed1:4e61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: meta/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B743A159; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 07:45:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 16:45:19 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao To: ports@FreeBSD.org, ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: FLAVORS for Ruby Message-ID: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE amd64 User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 07:45:23 -0000 Hi, I would like to suggest introducing FLAVOR to Ruby ports. AFAIK multiple version of Ruby ports (lang/ruby??) can be installed at the same time. One of these ruby ports will be *default* installed as PREFIX/bin/ruby. In contrast of Ruby lang, rubygem ports cannot be installed for multiple Ruby version at the same time. I would say Ruby and rubygem ports needs FLAVORS like Python ports. In Python ports, the same origin py- ports can be installed for multiple versions such as py27, py35, py36. If the same thing can be done with Ruby ports, FreeBSD Ruby ports will be much improved. I would appreciate if you Ruby folks bounce some ideas off each other. Let me know if someone's already working on FLAVORS on Ruby. Is there something that I can help you with? Thanks, -- meta From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 13 08:00:33 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468B3EA154 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:00:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46V7Nc70NTz4K5Y for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:00:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id ECBD9EA151; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:00:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC751EA150; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:00:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qt1-f194.google.com (mail-qt1-f194.google.com [209.85.160.194]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46V7Nc5YkTz4K5V; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:00:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt1-f194.google.com with SMTP id r15so32814220qtn.12; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 01:00:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tPvWEvmyOSz08kxP+C1AQPBv/Bb6M+Qr17zoAF5iYh0=; b=ekqVlCOUKMUQSvXneZeHbkm18JrnHoFF1p8tAJSf+dO6TMHO+DNLMmVOUBv4KXwIr6 zadwC0xlUofKZmA6n9qvq/fw1tIXcoSaglJCnvfSka+KWRfuiyOJ5/8GMUiPwj035KJo 6hWqe6mltsFWs4qpqxUrMIcHpRSUc6azqyWwjHtD1LDsTFRWgquDASAlozEd3gQZh6f5 0TilchW3E4KDYHLA0GkEgeloK5728IOUZbsnoEqqK5bnSZXDPP3C/0bZ81lHS662Z7g/ w53q2+x3SLN1ZZkasrTqlUtB2V6jAIzMVsCf5herGbaICEJ0ETogEle4MaYX6LQaaYZR Pejg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWQW2BKrm5qUqhhrK+0JOQl+VO7bUtjKwj9EMacvHtKqZPzMgWl IdbpiI7VrQPcfjjF511MXqb+J286l228/ZAvz+sELQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzJZkGyYvV9uIs8X/se/ibqcv6cygZ64dl9ms/uDZwD2U6YzTxJ7RfPr9gyqE7aEVtx66Npzh0RDrwsVemeNj8= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:12cc:: with SMTP id b12mr1605590qtj.369.1568361631254; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 01:00:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp> In-Reply-To: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp> From: Antoine Brodin Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 10:00:19 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby To: Koichiro Iwao Cc: ports@freebsd.org, ruby@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46V7Nc5YkTz4K5V X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:00:33 -0000 On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:45 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to suggest introducing FLAVOR to Ruby ports. > > AFAIK multiple version of Ruby ports (lang/ruby??) can be installed at > the same time. One of these ruby ports will be *default* installed as > PREFIX/bin/ruby. In contrast of Ruby lang, rubygem ports cannot be > installed for multiple Ruby version at the same time. > > I would say Ruby and rubygem ports needs FLAVORS like Python ports. > In Python ports, the same origin py- ports can be installed for multiple > versions such as py27, py35, py36. If the same thing can be done with > Ruby ports, FreeBSD Ruby ports will be much improved. > > I would appreciate if you Ruby folks bounce some ideas off each other. > Let me know if someone's already working on FLAVORS on Ruby. Is there > something that I can help you with? Please no. I don't see valid reasons. Antoine From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 13 09:06:51 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C93EB955 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:06:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46V8s72XQFz4MhB for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:06:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 56C68EB952; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:06:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5681DEB951; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:06:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46V8s71dgwz4Mh9; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:06:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (unknown [IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:9d6d:3b99:ed1:4e61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: meta/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C68CBAAD7; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:06:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 18:06:45 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao To: Antoine Brodin Cc: ports@freebsd.org, ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby Message-ID: <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE amd64 User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:06:51 -0000 On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:00:19AM +0200, Antoine Brodin wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:45 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to suggest introducing FLAVOR to Ruby ports. > > > > AFAIK multiple version of Ruby ports (lang/ruby??) can be installed at > > the same time. One of these ruby ports will be *default* installed as > > PREFIX/bin/ruby. In contrast of Ruby lang, rubygem ports cannot be > > installed for multiple Ruby version at the same time. > > > > I would say Ruby and rubygem ports needs FLAVORS like Python ports. > > In Python ports, the same origin py- ports can be installed for multiple > > versions such as py27, py35, py36. If the same thing can be done with > > Ruby ports, FreeBSD Ruby ports will be much improved. > > > > I would appreciate if you Ruby folks bounce some ideas off each other. > > Let me know if someone's already working on FLAVORS on Ruby. Is there > > something that I can help you with? > > Please no. I don't see valid reasons. Why? I don't see invalid reasons. Had Ruby FLAVORS already denied in the past? What's the difference between Rython and Ruby? py- ports can be installed for py35 and py36 at the same time. Why not for Ruby? I'm just brainstorming Ruby FLAVORS. Both positive opinions and negative opinions are welcome. -- meta From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 13 09:20:13 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA430EBD18 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46V98Y613fz4NK1 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CE2FFEBD17; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF4FEBD16 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay103.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay103.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign RSA OV SSL CA 2018" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46V98Y2BZLz4NK0; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2DgCACkXntd/ygG91FmHAEBAQQBAQc?= =?us-ascii?q?EAQGBZ4IYWWYBIBIWFI0dhgUBgg41AYoqkDkJAQECAQEBAQE3AQGEPwKCXCY?= =?us-ascii?q?4EwIMAQEFAQEBAQEGBG2Ea0+FSwEFOhwjEAsOCgklD0gGE4Uxq2KFS4NngRC?= =?us-ascii?q?BNIwQgX+BEYMSPoonBJVflmiCK4wOiF0nmQqofiGBWE0wCIMnkQk+AzCQKAE?= =?us-ascii?q?B?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2DgCACkXntd/ygG91FmHAEBAQQBAQcEAQGBZ4IYWWYBI?= =?us-ascii?q?BIWFI0dhgUBgg41AYoqkDkJAQECAQEBAQE3AQGEPwKCXCY4EwIMAQEFAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEGBG2Ea0+FSwEFOhwjEAsOCgklD0gGE4Uxq2KFS4NngRCBNIwQgX+BEYMSP?= =?us-ascii?q?oonBJVflmiCK4wOiF0nmQqofiGBWE0wCIMnkQk+AzCQKAEB?= Received: from 40.6-247-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.247.6.40]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 13 Sep 2019 11:20:10 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x8D9K6HC079247; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 11:20:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 11:20:06 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?VMSzbA==?= Coosemans To: Koichiro Iwao Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: dos2unix patch? Message-ID: <20190913112006.49000962@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20190912052357.rywdc2ewf3nrpy36@icepick.vmeta.jp> References: <20190912052357.rywdc2ewf3nrpy36@icepick.vmeta.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46V98Y2BZLz4NK0 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:5432, ipnet:195.238.0.0/19, country:BE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:20:14 -0000 On Thu, 12 Sep 2019 14:23:58 +0900 Koichiro Iwao wrote: > is it possible to run dos2unix to patches fetched from PATCH_SITES? > or how can I change order of patch and dos2unix. > > I would like to apply dos2unix-ed patches to dos2unix-ed source. > Alternatively, applying patch first and then running dos2unix on > patched-source is OK to me. > > Patches fetched from PATCH_SITES have .patch suffix so I added *.patch > to DOS2UNIX_GLOB but it didn't work. > > USES= dos2unix > DOS2UNIX_GLOB= *.c *.h You could add the patches to DISTFILES instead of PATCHFILES and then maybe do-extract will just copy them to WRKDIR, but if not, you can set EXTRACT_ONLY to the original distfile and copy the patches to WRKDIR in post-extract. Then dos2unix should work and you can add the WRKDIR patches to EXTRA_PATCHES. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 13 09:25:51 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D1AEC026 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:25:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46V9H35JpMz4NrH for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:25:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B49B7EC025; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:25:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B45F2EC024 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:25:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46V9H3490Nz4NrG; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:25:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (unknown [IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:9d6d:3b99:ed1:4e61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: meta/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 72DB7AD2B; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:25:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 18:25:47 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao To: =?utf-8?Q?T=C4=B3l?= Coosemans Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: dos2unix patch? Message-ID: <20190913092547.nk76ri2uup66fpxr@icepick.vmeta.jp> References: <20190912052357.rywdc2ewf3nrpy36@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190913112006.49000962@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20190913112006.49000962@FreeBSD.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE amd64 User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:25:51 -0000 On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 11:20:06AM +0200, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > You could add the patches to DISTFILES instead of PATCHFILES and then > maybe do-extract will just copy them to WRKDIR, but if not, you can set > EXTRACT_ONLY to the original distfile and copy the patches to WRKDIR in > post-extract. Then dos2unix should work and you can add the WRKDIR > patches to EXTRA_PATCHES. Thanks, I give it a try! -- meta From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 13 15:34:02 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DC7F47A9 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:34:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46VKRt1r2tz3KWX for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:34:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3D37BF47A6; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D00AF47A5 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:34:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46VKRs26znz3KWQ for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id r17so2141162wme.0 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:34:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=X//MaEkoeRgf7Sc7SKJRlwSxoSPQSDd9LWuZGd6aBjU=; b=mwxYB94vQS/khbgwc+47mXr3zit8RNYQ5ekyRJVllZhJddqyWl3i3DtksXKY9f7ssR 4Dyjv1Q7+9hLu5gIZ1Qys9rN4dmVHv1eSD8Yy7FwlyScsTZwZxaa0ofBDphV2n+Lnw08 OiRGBJ2b+tFwQxYS8g463joiw2py9X9SljpaVwXB30xQExreFFpce672ujMSBk2pLEqU Lyc5dZ6/oHjQiV1ZMDSUnQ42OAaosYCeEwmfcFoniA+BqZusNhp7Ynbu3s9GYtDxI55y snlcaVE6t9JqDYa3T1lb62FEtH3/KYOGWokZiqXOLjWNU8H6MVukHM7j/MNAytRvkDS1 rJMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=X//MaEkoeRgf7Sc7SKJRlwSxoSPQSDd9LWuZGd6aBjU=; b=rfg+9l/jOoAF2L+kWKq4BYd3NMh7/m5SdIikhA+XVBW06tN7FcyfkjvJiIneicLe2p y7YS84OhE+HUHB38mp91y5s7m+BH6cQjtNSbMuh+xQANcNCAsySU5QKJv5jiYYX5zJt+ qM65EYtFFE7lqfyAqfi8D/2B28x+dCrsCbfpdMHEi2tKKvT9TpjGEV1WlRp3wurxE8Yx rYyGoXxAEMh46tBRubYk0/oODZQ6XWdYvxzSHNa2epNPox6L1ddYB3Iv2a4Eif1d2sFp z56vASTX3HBETjIX/gPMGlwl5kFjcjxq6K71JtvLXuXZzTHmxlWHC0EzGcdualRzErWO uiTA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUvim+cEfZHPg8J6K6glasmpvHlvALrGN3PErdPRBU6FeRAiDeZ kuwTPLQETNb/F8N/u/iFRQ1YcdDcPgc4LfsWCfVI0Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw6nWcZA9pA1NuJLf9slScQdhRDIHg2MvSFo1norgpOt4YqjQ/rd5cYU5WW2rITYjIuJW8I/wCjjqLdpXIsHpE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:21cf:: with SMTP id x15mr4125332wmj.145.1568388839362; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 08:33:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> In-Reply-To: <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> From: Adam Weinberger Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 09:33:43 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby To: Koichiro Iwao Cc: Antoine Brodin , FreeBSD Ports , ruby@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46VKRs26znz3KWQ X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=mwxYB94v; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of adamw@adamw.org designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::32d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamw@adamw.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.39 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[adamw.org]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[d.2.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-2.89)[ip: (-9.22), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.96), asn: 15169(-2.24), country: US(-0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 15:34:02 -0000 On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:06 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 10:00:19AM +0200, Antoine Brodin wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:45 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I would like to suggest introducing FLAVOR to Ruby ports. > > > > > > AFAIK multiple version of Ruby ports (lang/ruby??) can be installed at > > > the same time. One of these ruby ports will be *default* installed as > > > PREFIX/bin/ruby. In contrast of Ruby lang, rubygem ports cannot be > > > installed for multiple Ruby version at the same time. > > > > > > I would say Ruby and rubygem ports needs FLAVORS like Python ports. > > > In Python ports, the same origin py- ports can be installed for multiple > > > versions such as py27, py35, py36. If the same thing can be done with > > > Ruby ports, FreeBSD Ruby ports will be much improved. > > > > > > I would appreciate if you Ruby folks bounce some ideas off each other. > > > Let me know if someone's already working on FLAVORS on Ruby. Is there > > > something that I can help you with? > > > > Please no. I don't see valid reasons. > > Why? I don't see invalid reasons. Had Ruby FLAVORS already denied in the > past? What's the difference between Rython and Ruby? py- ports can be > installed for py35 and py36 at the same time. Why not for Ruby? > > I'm just brainstorming Ruby FLAVORS. Both positive opinions and negative > opinions are welcome. Systems MUST be able to support concurrent installations of python2.7 and actual python. What is your use case for concurrent ruby? # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Sep 14 04:27:46 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78A79DE39A for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 04:27:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46Vfcf2Rfcz4TmW for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 04:27:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 518BADE396; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 04:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5137CDE395; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 04:27:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Vfcf1Qrjz4TmV; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 04:27:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Received: from icepick.vmeta.jp (unknown [IPv6:2405:6586:2280:1200:fd42:5552:159f:ed8e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: meta/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BC663133BC; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 04:27:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from meta@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 13:27:38 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao To: Adam Weinberger Cc: FreeBSD Ports , ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby Message-ID: <20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp> References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 12.0-STABLE amd64 User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 04:27:46 -0000 On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:43AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > Systems MUST be able to support concurrent installations of python2.7 > and actual python. What is your use case for concurrent ruby? I know the importance of Python 2. Even if it is EoL-ed, it will be required over the next a few years because not a few applications don't migrate to Python 3. So that's true and reasonable. Excuse me that I'm answering your question with a question. What about PHP? Concurrent installation is a MUST? FreeBSD ports allows concurrent installations of multiple Ruby versions however doesn't allow concurrent installations of rubygems for multiple Ruby versions. This inconsistency is the issue for me. -- meta From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Sep 14 06:39:25 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C932E9DA8 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 06:39:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46VjXY10dQz4bPp for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 06:39:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 201A6E9DA7; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 06:39:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FAAAE9DA5; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 06:39:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk1-f194.google.com (mail-qk1-f194.google.com [209.85.222.194]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46VjXY004qz4bPm; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 06:39:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk1-f194.google.com with SMTP id u186so6849117qkc.5; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 23:39:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sKXbrFnVcOQBlUzVDhBKXyPIx5nCG6mUE+lJf87+CjY=; b=M86/uI9PkKh3BMo7L/LhWQPYHKyEEPYyHSMFrxsMURuqgAXTIvr1z4Lyw9urTE+9Cy 2DjMCS3XCrYQm85R9u3J/85m9lFAGMUPHwNdX99okyaYoSCmDr4/9uN+RcjnLThpLmr3 Q6fj5p67YX9WpwkhKIC8LpEYwOmwrlJpHdK1hU9kAyGL1dfN5Z1PmW+cHRxMIfbzmImD 1X8ZwGJMxEvMwnTOLJoOUCCmxGiS+jgBGCc4AKdLQvpkhLorH7sI8sA9BcmYC1iWMe65 DDSmyDYsHl4fja7GMDh7tjrv71HYhD1QfNDecWo7JPJ2BleID8jR8e7UwoZqE3PZp10i Jecw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWO6e/4uxkc3y68DJPgNy9srPybNX1kJysl76sPCXAN+JsJ5rSe JPolD4o3CtjV0yLABA24LE8klwdvifMnhKImDCSJuQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyilD9RmxlV3RazLXT7myZOLU1yF7dihMLcSD+U4IWf9smYSRYoTwU7TmMT94OVHzbJXt/bM3eYDUuJSD9c7Zc= X-Received: by 2002:a37:a48b:: with SMTP id n133mr44740475qke.398.1568443163546; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 23:39:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp> In-Reply-To: <20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp> From: Antoine Brodin Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 08:39:12 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby To: Koichiro Iwao Cc: Adam Weinberger , FreeBSD Ports , ruby@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46VjXY004qz4bPm X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.00 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 06:39:25 -0000 On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 6:27 AM Koichiro Iwao wrote: > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:43AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > Systems MUST be able to support concurrent installations of python2.7 > > and actual python. What is your use case for concurrent ruby? > > I know the importance of Python 2. Even if it is EoL-ed, it will be > required over the next a few years because not a few applications don't > migrate to Python 3. So that's true and reasonable. > > Excuse me that I'm answering your question with a question. What about > PHP? Concurrent installation is a MUST? > > FreeBSD ports allows concurrent installations of multiple Ruby versions > however doesn't allow concurrent installations of rubygems for multiple > Ruby versions. This inconsistency is the issue for me. This isn't a valid reason for me. Why do you need ruby version 2.4 or 2.5 concurrently installed with version 2.6? Is there a bug in version 2.6? Cheers, Antoine From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Sep 14 16:52:52 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB59F97AB for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 16:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46Vz8N1T4hz4Btg for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 16:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 326F9F97A9; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 16:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3234DF97A8 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 16:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46Vz8M0pr1z4Btd for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 16:52:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id f12so69453114iog.12 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 09:52:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+/UFiz1kBkERBBzb1BVIxCEQi8f2hjsbaZcL+HfuF6k=; b=Ntl1AV2OHJTyRVvTri//ZBVLuNmll3+W+SNvX83BT2qlr57WTfsci8hraiaZhY5dEf Yw3lfk8pi2BjFnUuUIvLnqV+UQPLsGpc+VdDwFbs58G2wpdJ+uOqiRyyp2V9+4+/Caq6 maeL2jq3iEBgONsBLQwMII2fjiwsOAfo9G/h4b36W8N9RrxCgGtmn1NlUHTK86c3ZSwV dVhie9S5ypnU6/xeUpa1DlXdrwjyndHBxAthu7b+0vl8d8ym1z/+sSnO+Gey5QhP3lds RuB7xiWImFkS0vJs2QAH9K/q+h/CFzSWYJDWKsNLUkukOlMSX9Nw+aBt/OdSTtJg7+f6 iqHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+/UFiz1kBkERBBzb1BVIxCEQi8f2hjsbaZcL+HfuF6k=; b=e1PhiBAuSIfI+LSVKqYEuDgSyJMX9v3BAqe5+evMLjmrThbXi3hMekd7fm9ivbDvFw tZhhRZN7n7OcxWp+xvnh8b/JYJgY8Xr9GYwNFNUEK8MB9tyYDNC4Dwps1sQTXwiUsL8R roMVteOqXRNI5fH4ttrLDNLYjvoI2Cme+yLH39Vp5BSSnMhKkpRvDQ/1bBXwpkrHvzeE lLq8jekpC1yOBKMpT1UPMsKyu+slxWytzL5MYNXWFeFYZnk2Q+BqbKQawz/lBZM1Oxly XOVMvFV5rYks9PjMzL0zIBBUprT30IydXbgZgZWuUxXD7v9+9HmkTydyS2HoPQqDD8rk Uvmw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUUjzhv4BleZaBVbNR2DLXCMfdHP3czrG/q1TG8tk8cAdLBEaFN WVNmMJU5+jVOiKnObsandVWE8dFBO+cEwA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwnkQnkdqrkCx4GGD0SpZUGBPi1DlEQ6cARJZGMsX45YQddBJsUub7QQg0YRREEd9gWK5LXyA== X-Received: by 2002:a02:8563:: with SMTP id g90mr5810622jai.63.1568479968017; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 09:52:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:8c3:8100:160f:39b8:a7ea:939a:e0e9? ([2601:8c3:8100:160f:39b8:a7ea:939a:e0e9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r138sm38352440iod.59.2019.09.14.09.52.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Sep 2019 09:52:46 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: FLAVORS for Ruby From: Adam Weinberger X-Mailer: iPad Mail (16G102) In-Reply-To: <20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 10:52:45 -0600 Cc: FreeBSD Ports , ruby@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <006FCB74-04EB-4A82-A800-6C7CA273E749@adamw.org> References: <20190913074519.xfu3avb4ihmfzm2o@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190913090645.buutinhgh2pygb4h@icepick.vmeta.jp> <20190914042738.r3hedyqtpxsxnd5e@icepick.vmeta.jp> To: Koichiro Iwao X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46Vz8M0pr1z4Btd X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=Ntl1AV2O; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of adamw@adamw.org designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=adamw@adamw.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.09 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36:c]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[adamw.org]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[adamw-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[5.3.d.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-2.09)[ip: (-5.47), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.70), asn: 15169(-2.24), country: US(-0.05)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 16:52:52 -0000 > On Sep 13, 2019, at 22:27, Koichiro Iwao wrote: >=20 >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 09:33:43AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: >> Systems MUST be able to support concurrent installations of python2.7 >> and actual python. What is your use case for concurrent ruby? >=20 > I know the importance of Python 2. Even if it is EoL-ed, it will be > required over the next a few years because not a few applications don't > migrate to Python 3. So that's true and reasonable. >=20 > Excuse me that I'm answering your question with a question. What about > PHP? Concurrent installation is a MUST? >=20 > FreeBSD ports allows concurrent installations of multiple Ruby versions > however doesn't allow concurrent installations of rubygems for multiple > Ruby versions. This inconsistency is the issue for me. The issue is that FLAVORS has added a substantial (and painful) complexity t= o python ports and python.mk. It means that a number of people have had to b= e hyper-vigilant and watch commits closely to catch errors introduced when p= eople utilize the paradigm incorrectly. It=E2=80=99s a bitter pill, but it=E2= =80=99s accepted because the use-case for multiple concurrent python version= s is essential. As Antoine said, inconsistency isn=E2=80=99t a strong enough use case. Which= brings us back to the original question: is there a specific use-case for c= oncurrent ruby that makes the substantial increase in cognitive load, comple= xity, and monitoring worth it? # Adam =E2=80=94 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Sep 14 18:29:48 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCC4FBABA for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46W1JD3r8Tz4HZR for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 80F12FBAB9; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80768FBAB8 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 18:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx2.dismail.de (mx2.dismail.de [159.69.191.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx2.dismail.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46W1JC0MRmz4HZ6 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 18:29:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from mx2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 993a2c07 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 20:29:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de ( [10.240.26.12]) by mx2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 56717946 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 20:29:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 0906edee for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 20:29:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 170fff36 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 20:29:41 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 14:29:37 -0400 From: To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: netsurf Message-ID: <20190914142937.69265737@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.4 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46W1JC0MRmz4HZ6 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.70 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=20190914]; IP_SCORE(-2.00)[ip: (-9.91), ipnet: 159.69.0.0/16(1.73), asn: 24940(-1.79), country: DE(-0.01)]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:159.69.191.136]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[dismail.de.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[136.191.69.159.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:159.69.0.0/16, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 18:29:48 -0000 I tried to install Netsurf but looks like it has still open bug from 2018: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D229164 Look like if I use subversion I cannot install Netsurf? Thank you. --=20 =E2=80=9CHungry man, reach for the book: it is a weapon.=E2=80=9D=20 =E2=80=95 Bertolt Brecht From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Sep 14 18:34:40 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04EFCFBDD0 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 18:34:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46W1Pp6slyz4J1s for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 18:34:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from pam-s.drei.host ([213.90.36.66]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1i9CsU-0004o5-Uh for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 20:34:34 +0200 Received: from 80-121-61-109.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([80.121.61.109] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by pam-s.drei.host with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1i9CsU-0006Gr-RH for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 20:34:34 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20190914142937.69265737@dismail.de> Subject: Re: netsurf From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <81a28e67-deeb-4cf1-3a74-467d252270b4@utanet.at> Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 20:34:31 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190914142937.69265737@dismail.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-H3G-Authenticated-As: cf62768e218b4d81d95cc5390f1bd9dfc8b05683 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46W1Pp6slyz4J1s X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at designates 2001:938:1337:25::25:46 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.57 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:938:1337:25::/64]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HFILTER_URL_ONELINE(2.50)[plain:0:1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[109.61.121.80.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.11]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[6.4.0.0.5.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.5.2.0.0.7.3.3.1.8.3.9.0.1.0.0.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8437, ipnet:2001:938::/32, country:AT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[utanet.at]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utanet.at]; IP_SCORE_FREEMAIL(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[ip: (-9.48), ipnet: 2001:938::/32(-4.74), asn: 8437(-3.75), country: AT(-0.10)]; HFILTER_URL_ONLY(1.47)[0.66666666666667]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 18:34:40 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232799 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Sep 14 23:34:45 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0B69D2782 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 23:34:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (mailman.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46W84556sJz4c8H for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 23:34:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AFB39D2781; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 23:34:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF731D2780 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 23:34:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46W84453LRz4c8G for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 23:34:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from yv.noip.me (c-67-180-169-236.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.169.236]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id x8ENYggd053892 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 16:34:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-67-180-169-236.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.169.236] claimed to be yv.noip.me To: "ports@freebsd.org" From: Yuri Subject: Please commit the patch in Bug 235275 - Multiply bundled GH_TUPLE repositories result in broken links - it holds up one new port Message-ID: Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 16:34:41 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46W84453LRz4c8G X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yuri@rawbw.com designates 198.144.192.42 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yuri@rawbw.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.77 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[236.169.180.67.khpj7ygk5idzvmvt5x4ziurxhy.zen.dq.spamhaus.net : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:198.144.192.32/27]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[ports@freebsd.org]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[rawbw.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[42.192.144.198.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.57)[ip: (-5.90), ipnet: 198.144.192.0/20(-3.18), asn: 7961(-3.71), country: US(-0.05)]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7961, ipnet:198.144.192.0/20, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 23:34:46 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235275 Thanks, Yuri