Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 12 Mar 1995 01:46:20 +0100 (MET)
From:      J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
To:        mark@grondar.za
Cc:        freebsd-bugs@freefall.cdrom.com
Subject:   Re: bin/239: Multiply defined symbols in the libraries
Message-ID:  <199503120046.BAA03000@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <199503112230.OAA00704@freefall.cdrom.com> from "Mark Murray" at Mar 11, 95 02:30:01 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Mark Murray wrote:
> 
> 
> /usr/lib/libgnuregex.so.2.0: Definition of symbol `_regerror' (multiply defined)
> /usr/lib/libcompat.a(regerror.o): Definition of symbol `_regerror' (multiply defined)
> /usr/lib/libcompat.a(regex.o): Definition of symbol `_regerror' (multiply defined)
> /usr/lib/libc.so.2.0: Definition of symbol `_regerror' (multiply defined)

Shit.  Basically means that the theory that ``the appropriate regerror
is being taken automatically'' is wrong.

Just curious: what is the libcompat for when linking gdb?
-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199503120046.BAA03000>