From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 00:18:55 1995 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id AAA24204 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 00:18:55 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id AAA24187 ; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 00:18:49 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.9) id AAA03692; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 00:18:44 -0700 Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 00:18:44 -0700 Message-Id: <199510040718.AAA03692@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: jkh@freebsd.org CC: stable@freebsd.org Subject: shared libgcc in latest snap From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I just noticed this in the bin.?? distribution: -r--r--r-- bin/bin 26376 Sep 29 07:16 1995 usr/lib/libgcc.so.261.0 Didn't we stop producing this as a shared library? Even the one on my -stable system has a timestamp of June 10 (and I've done numerous make world since then). Satoshi From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 00:46:06 1995 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id AAA26762 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 00:46:06 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id AAA26755 ; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 00:46:01 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.9) id AAA03774; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 00:45:52 -0700 Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 00:45:52 -0700 Message-Id: <199510040745.AAA03774@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: jkh@freebsd.org CC: stable@freebsd.org, rich@freebsd.org Subject: XFree86-3.1.2 From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk The latest snap's XF86311 link is pointing to the same directory of 2.0.5R, which is, um, version 3.1.1. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 00:56:09 1995 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id AAA27677 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 00:56:09 -0700 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id AAA27671 ; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 00:56:06 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id AAA17038; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 00:56:00 -0700 To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) cc: jkh@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, rich@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFree86-3.1.2 In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Oct 1995 00:45:52 PDT." <199510040745.AAA03774@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Wed, 04 Oct 1995 00:55:59 -0700 Message-ID: <17036.812793359@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk That's correct. This wasn't fixed until just now. Jordan > The latest snap's XF86311 link is pointing to the same directory of > 2.0.5R, which is, um, version 3.1.1. > > Satoshi From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 01:26:09 1995 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id BAA00542 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 01:26:09 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA00537 ; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 01:26:05 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.9) id BAA04044; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 01:26:00 -0700 Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 01:26:00 -0700 Message-Id: <199510040826.BAA04044@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: davidg@freebsd.org CC: stable@freebsd.org Subject: -fno-strength-reduce not in sample /etc/make.conf From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Even though it is just a comment, this one should be pulled in to the - stable branch before the release.... Satoshi ------- revision 1.21 date: 1995/09/15 01:05:41; author: ache; state: Exp; lines: +2 -2 Add -fno-strength-reduce to -O2 optimization, all stuff commented out From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 04:20:50 1995 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id EAA10510 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 04:20:50 -0700 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA10496 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 04:20:45 -0700 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.50]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id EAA19490; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 04:19:19 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id EAA00495; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 04:20:39 -0700 Message-Id: <199510041120.EAA00495@corbin.Root.COM> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -fno-strength-reduce not in sample /etc/make.conf In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Oct 95 01:26:00 PDT." <199510040826.BAA04044@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Wed, 04 Oct 1995 04:20:30 -0700 Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >Even though it is just a comment, this one should be pulled in to the - >stable branch before the release.... > >Satoshi >------- >revision 1.21 >date: 1995/09/15 01:05:41; author: ache; state: Exp; lines: +2 -2 >Add -fno-strength-reduce to -O2 optimization, all stuff commented out It already has. -DG From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Oct 4 04:25:18 1995 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id EAA10655 for stable-outgoing; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 04:25:18 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA10646 for ; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 04:25:16 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.9) id EAA04994; Wed, 4 Oct 1995 04:25:08 -0700 Date: Wed, 4 Oct 1995 04:25:08 -0700 Message-Id: <199510041125.EAA04994@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: davidg@Root.COM CC: stable@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199510041120.EAA00495@corbin.Root.COM> (message from David Greenman on Wed, 04 Oct 1995 04:20:30 -0700) Subject: Re: -fno-strength-reduce not in sample /etc/make.conf From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk * >revision 1.21 * >date: 1995/09/15 01:05:41; author: ache; state: Exp; lines: +2 -2 * >Add -fno-strength-reduce to -O2 optimization, all stuff commented out * * It already has. Duh, I don't know what I was looking at. (Still having trouble with the "-stable" branch growing "up" into the middle in the cvs rlog output.) Sorry.... :< Satoshi From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Oct 5 10:59:09 1995 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id KAA15710 for stable-outgoing; Thu, 5 Oct 1995 10:59:09 -0700 Received: from relay-3.mail.demon.net (post.demon.co.uk [158.152.1.72]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA15698 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 1995 10:58:34 -0700 Received: from gnome.demon.co.uk by relay-3.mail.demon.net id aa10976; 5 Oct 95 10:05 +0100 Received: (from jacs@localhost) by hawk.gnome.co.uk (8.6.12/8.6.9) id KAA01584; Thu, 5 Oct 1995 10:02:47 +0100 Date: Thu, 5 Oct 1995 10:02:47 +0100 Subject: lpr bug still not fixed To: stable@freebsd.org From: Chris Stenton Message-Id: Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Hi, I sent this bug fix a number of weeks ago to bugs@freebsd.org but still not seen it in the release code. Currently lpr -r does not work. The following is a diff fix. *** lpr.c.old Sat Aug 26 14:48:00 1995 --- lpr.c Wed Oct 4 11:13:41 1995 *************** *** 600,609 **** if (cp == file) { fd = checkwriteperm(file,"/"); } else { ! strcpy(path,file); *cp = '\0'; fd = checkwriteperm(path,file); *cp = '/'; } if (fd == 0) return(1); --- 600,611 ---- if (cp == file) { fd = checkwriteperm(file,"/"); } else { ! path = malloc(strlen(file)+1 ); ! strcpy (path, file); *cp = '\0'; fd = checkwriteperm(path,file); *cp = '/'; + free(path); } if (fd == 0) return(1); ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr Chris Stenton chris@gnome.co.uk Gnome Computers Ltd Tel/Fax: 44 (0)1480 406164 25A Huntingdon St, St Neots, Cambridgeshire, PE19 1BG ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 11:29:47 1995 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id LAA13317 for stable-outgoing; Sat, 7 Oct 1995 11:29:47 -0700 Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id LAA13308 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 1995 11:29:45 -0700 Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <14862(2)>; Sat, 7 Oct 1995 11:29:07 PDT Received: by crevenia.parc.xerox.com id <177475>; Sat, 7 Oct 1995 11:28:56 -0700 From: Bill Fenner To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Confusing errors from mtree when building -stable Message-Id: <95Oct7.112856pdt.177475@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> Date: Sat, 7 Oct 1995 11:28:55 PDT Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I just sup'd -stable and started a "make world"; I got some interesting error messages from the mtree stage: mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p /usr/include missing: ./machine (not created: File exists) missing: ./net (not created: File exists) missing: ./netccitt (not created: File exists) missing: ./netinet (not created: File exists) missing: ./netiso (not created: File exists) missing: ./netns (not created: File exists) missing: ./nfs (not created: File exists) missing: ./sys (not created: File exists) missing: ./ufs (not created: File exists) missing: ./ufs/ffs (not created: File exists) missing: ./ufs/lfs (not created: File exists) missing: ./ufs/mfs (not created: File exists) missing: ./ufs/ufs (not created: File exists) missing: ./vm (not created: File exists) mtree thinks it's missing but doesn't create it because it exists? Pretty cool. Bill From owner-freebsd-stable Sat Oct 7 12:54:01 1995 Return-Path: owner-stable Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id MAA17462 for stable-outgoing; Sat, 7 Oct 1995 12:54:01 -0700 Received: from GndRsh.aac.dev.com (GndRsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA17449 for ; Sat, 7 Oct 1995 12:53:57 -0700 Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by GndRsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) id MAA08707; Sat, 7 Oct 1995 12:53:42 -0700 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199510071953.MAA08707@GndRsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: Confusing errors from mtree when building -stable To: fenner@parc.xerox.com (Bill Fenner) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 1995 12:53:41 -0700 (PDT) Cc: stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <95Oct7.112856pdt.177475@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> from "Bill Fenner" at Oct 7, 95 11:28:55 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1722 Sender: owner-stable@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > I just sup'd -stable and started a "make world"; I got some interesting > error messages from the mtree stage: > > mtree -deU -f /usr/src/etc/mtree/BSD.include.dist -p /usr/include > missing: ./machine (not created: File exists) > missing: ./net (not created: File exists) > missing: ./netccitt (not created: File exists) > missing: ./netinet (not created: File exists) > missing: ./netiso (not created: File exists) > missing: ./netns (not created: File exists) > missing: ./nfs (not created: File exists) > missing: ./sys (not created: File exists) > missing: ./ufs (not created: File exists) > missing: ./ufs/ffs (not created: File exists) > missing: ./ufs/lfs (not created: File exists) > missing: ./ufs/mfs (not created: File exists) > missing: ./ufs/ufs (not created: File exists) > missing: ./vm (not created: File exists) > > mtree thinks it's missing but doesn't create it because it exists? Pretty > cool. Mtree is currently confused by symbolic links and needs an -H option that says if the spec says this should be a directory and you find a link follow the link to see if it points to a directory, if it does then do the right things about setting permissions. Or something close to that.. carefull though needs to go into the implementation of a -H option for mtree as interesting things might happen if you had broken symbolic links are where not carefull with how you handled it (IMHO, that case should cause an error more like: missing: ./machine (not created: Broken symbolic link)) Anyone feel like tackling mtree and symbolic links.... -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD