Date: Mon, 22 Jul 1996 19:20:24 +0300 (EET DST) From: Petri Helenius <pete@sms.fi> To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@plains.nodak.edu> Cc: freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Subject: freebsd-hackers ATM-FR virtual interface Message-ID: <199607221620.TAA11910@silver.sms.fi> In-Reply-To: <199606271448.JAA06969@plains.nodak.edu> References: <199606271448.JAA06969@plains.nodak.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Tinguely writes: > > list, I will not repost the digest file, but interested people can ftp > the file from: > > ftp://joy.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu/pub/hacker-atm-fr-mail > > I will leave the file on the above machine for a couple weeks. > To throw my opinion into the game since I consider that I've seen most what the boxes do today and how they are being used is that there is different scenarios where you want to either group (group == >=1 VC's) for a NBMA logical interface, have a point-to-point logical interface (with broadcast capability) on a single VC or have a point-to-point or NBMA interface with dynamically established connections. All these should have the possibility of having multiple VC's for a single destination with variance in QoS. Throwing LANE into the game you also have to support logical broadcast interface with ARP. Unclear enough? :-) Pete
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607221620.TAA11910>